# Draft Sampling Plan Duke Energy’s
Miami Fort Station North Bend, OH
Sampling Episode 6560

Prepared for:



## U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Engineering and Analysis Division
Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460

Prepared by:



### Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Parkway
Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151

June 1, 2010

EPA Contract No. 68-C-02-095 Work Assignment 7-29i TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. I NTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Objectives and Scope ........................................................................................... 1-1

1.3 Plant Selection ..................................................................................................... 1-2

2. F ACILITY O VERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 FGD Scrubber Systems ........................................................................................ 2-2

2.2 FGD Wastewater Trea tment System ................................................................... 2-3

3. S AMPLING P ROCEDURES ................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Sampling Point Selection ..................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Analyte Selection ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Sample Collection Procedures ............................................................................. 3-2

3.3.1 Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment System (SP-1) .................... 3-3

3.3.2 Effluent from the FGD Wastewater Treatment System (SP-2) ............... 3-8 3.4 Sample Preservation, Shi pping, and Analysis ................................................... 3-18 3.5 Field Measurements and Engineering Data Collection ..................................... 3-19 3.6 Sample Labeling ................................................................................................ 3-20 3.7 Traffic Reports ................................................................................................... 3-20 3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control .................................................................... 3-21 3.9 Sample Splitting ................................................................................................. 3-22

4. S AMPLING A CTIVITIES ...................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Sampling Team Organization .............................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Presampling Preparation ...................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Field Sampling Activities .................................................................................... 4-1 4.4 Logistics ............................................................................................................... 4 -2

4.4.1 Miami Fort Station Contacts .................................................................... 4-2

4.4.2 EPA Contacts ........................................................................................... 4-2 4.4.3 Analytical Laboratories ............................................................................ 4-3

4.4.4 ERG Contacts ........................................................................................... 4-3 4.4.5 Freight Forwarders ................................................................................... 4-3

5. S AMPLE S HIPMENT ........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Sample Set Preparation ........................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Sample Packing .................................................................................................... 5-1

6. S ITE -S PECIFIC H EALTH AND S AFETY P ROCEDURES .......................................................... 6-1 6.1 Emergency/Medical Procedures .......................................................................... 6-1

6.1.1 First Aid 6-1 6.1.2 Site Evacuation/Emergency Response Plan ............................................. 6-1 6.1.3 Emergency Showers and Eye Washes ..................................................... 6-1 6.1.4 Local Hospital .......................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 ERG Health and Safety Responsibilities and Authority ...................................... 6-1 6.2.1 Work Assignment Manager ..................................................................... 6-2TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

ii 6.2.2 Crew Chief ............................................................................................... 6-2 6.2.3 Sampling Team Members ........................................................................ 6-2 6.3 Briefings ............................................................................................................... 6 -2 6.3.1 Off-Site Briefings..................................................................................... 6-2 6.3.2 On-Site Briefings ..................................................................................... 6-3 6.4 Safety Procedures ................................................................................................. 6-3

6.4.1 PPE 6-3 6.4.2 Safety Practices ........................................................................................ 6-3

6.4.3 Safe Work Practices ................................................................................. 6-4 6.5 Sampling-Point-Specific Safety Procedures ........................................................ 6-4 6.5.1 Physical Hazards ...................................................................................... 6-4

6.5.2 Thermal Hazards ...................................................................................... 6-5

6.5.3 Chemical Hazards .................................................................................... 6-5 6.6 Temperature Extremes ......................................................................................... 6-5

6.6.1 Heat Stress ............................................................................................... 6-5 6.6.2 Heat Stress Monitoring ............................................................................ 6-6

6.7 First Aid ............................................................................................................... 6 -7 6.8 Sample Preservation and Safety Considerations .................................................. 6-8 6.9 Training and Medical Mon itoring Requirements ................................................ 6-8

6.10 Shift Work Protocol ............................................................................................. 6-9

7. R EFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 7-1iii LIST OF TABLES

Page

3-1 Sample Collection at Miami Fort Station ...................................................................... 3-23

3-2 Analytical Methods ........................................................................................................ 3-24

3-3 Summary of Sample Container and Planned Preservation ............................................ 3-25

3-4 Sampling Point Field Measurements ............................................................................. 3-26

6-1 Sample-Point-Specific PPE and Potential Hazards ....................................................... 6-10iv LIST OF FIGURES

Page

2-1 Chemical Precipitaiton FGD Wastewater Treatment System, Miami Fort Station ......... 2-5

3-1 Sample Preservation Log Sheet ..................................................................................... 3-27

3-2 Field Sampling Log Sheet .............................................................................................. 3-2 8

3-3 Engineering Data Collection Sheet (Page 1 of 3) .......................................................... 3-29

3-4 Engineering Data Collection Sheet (Page 2 of 3) .......................................................... 3-30

3-5 Engineering Data Collection Sheet (Page 3 of 3) .......................................................... 3-31

3-6 Example Traffic Report ................................................................................................. 3- 321-1 1. I NTRODUCTION

The Engineering and Analysis Division (E AD) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently conducting a sampli ng program at steam electric power plants. The sampling program will characterize raw wastewaters generated by coal-fired steam electric power plants, as well as evaluate treatment tec hnologies and best management practices used to reduce pollutant discharges. This sampling plan , developed for the Duke Energy’s Miami Fort Station (Miami Fort), located in North Bend, Oh io, provides plant-specific sampling procedures

and methods EPA and its contractors will follo w when conducting sampling activities. Sampling will be performed by EPA’s tec hnical contractor, Eastern Res earch Group, Inc. (ERG), under

Contract No. 68-C-02-095. This docum ent, in combination with the Generic Sampling and Analysis Plan for Coal-Fired Steam Electric Power Plants [1], is intended to serve as a guide to the ERG field sampling crew, a review mech anism for EPA personnel, and a source of procedural information for plant personnel.

1.1 Background

During its recently completed detailed st udy of the steam electric industry, EPA identified metals and certain other constituents pr esent in the wastewater discharges from steam electric power plants that are contributing the majority of the toxic loadings for the industry. Additionally, EPA determined that one of the wa ste streams contributing most of these toxic loadings are associated with wet flue gas desu lfurization (FGD) systems present at coal-fired power plants.

This sampling plan will focus on charact erizing wastewaters and treatment system discharges at Miami Fort. For a general desc ription of the steam electric process and the wastewaters generated during the operation of a coal-fired st eam electric power plant, see Chapters 3 and 4 of the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category: Final Detailed Study Report [2].

1.2 Objectives and Scope

EPA is preparing to collect and analyze samples to characterize wastewater streams generated at coal-fired steam el ectric power plants. This sampli ng plan describes the approach EPA will use to collect and analyze samples to characterize untreated FGD scrubber purge and treated FGD wastewater from a chemical prec ipitation FGD wastewater treatment system. A chemical precipitation system utilizes physical a nd chemical treatment to remove heavy metals using hydroxide or a combination of hydroxide and sulfide precipitation.

Generally, the analytical results collected during this sampling program will support EPA in answering the following key questions:

 What are the characteristics (i.e., pollutant s present, pollutant concentrations, flow rate/volume) of untreated F GD scrubber purge wastewater?

 What are the effluent concentrations for pollutants present in treated FGD

wastewater?1-2  What are the pollutant loadings associat ed with discharges of FGD wastewater following treatment?

EPA conducted a one-day presampling site visit at Miami Fort on March 1, 2010, and collected the following information:

 Information about the plant’s operations , including existing sampling data and results;

 Process-specific information;

 Information on pollution prevention a nd wastewater treatment operations;

 Plant-specific information to develop the sampling plans; and

 Information on potential sampling points.

The sampling program will consist of four-day sampling episodes at selected plants. The sampling will characterize the wastewater gene rated by wet FGD scrubbers and the treatment performance of the systems used to treat th e FGD scrubber purge wastewater. EPA will also collect field quality control (QC) samples cons isting of bottle blanks, field blanks, equipment blanks, and duplicate samples, a nd laboratory QC samples used for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate analyses.

EPA’s sampling program will provide data to perform an engineering assessment of the design, operation, and performance of treatment sy stems at steam electric power plants. In addition to sampling the wastewater, EPA will co llect information regarding system design and day-to-day operation.

1.3 Plant Selection

EPA expects to select up to seven coal-fir ed steam electric plants for FGD wastewater sampling, basing the plant selection on the proces s configurations and characteristics of the plants.

Miami Fort was selected by EPA for sampling based on the following site characteristics:

The plant is a coal-fired power plant that burns eastern b ituminous coal in each of its three generating units;

The plant operates limestone forced oxidation wet FGD systems on two of the three generating units;

The plant operates a segregated FGD wastew ater treatment system, which includes the following steps:

— Equalization and pH adjustment (lime addition),

— Organosulfide addition,

— Ferric chloride addition,

— Polymer addition,

— Clarification;1-3 The plant operates selectiv e catalytic reaction (SCR) systems on two of the three generating units (the same two that have associated FGD systems); and

The plant produces a commerc ial-grade gypsum by-product.2-1 2. F ACILITY O VERVIEW

Miami Fort operates three baseload steam el ectric generating units and each has a coalfired boiler. Unit 6, which began operation in 1960, has a generating capacity of 175 MW. Units 7 and 8, which began operation in 1975 and 1978, re spectively, each has a ge nerating capacity of 550 megawatts (MW). All three generating units burn eastern bituminous coal. The plant is located in North Bend, Ohio, approximately 20 mile s west of Cincinnati, and discharges to the

Ohio River.

Approximately three years ago, Miami Fort re trofitted Units 7 and 8 (but not Unit 6) with FGD scrubber systems to control the sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) releases from the plant. The removal efficiency of both FGD systems is approximately 96 percent. In addition to the FGD scrubber systems, Miami Fort installed an FGD wastewater treatment system to control the discharges of the wastewater generated during the operation of the FGD scrubbe rs. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 further discuss the FGD scrubber systems and the FGD wastewater treatment system, respectively.

Miami Fort retrofitted Units 7 and 8 w ith SCR systems in 2003 and 2001, respectively. The plant operates the SCR systems, which are used to control nitrogen oxide (NO X ) emissions from the plant, year round.

The electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) at Miam i Fort are particulate control devices that are designed to remove XX percent of the fly as h and other particulates from the flue gas. [QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: What percentage of the fly ash are the ESPs designed to remove from the flue gas?] U6 99.2%, U7 99.2% & U8 99.4% Miami Fort utilizes ESPs to remove the fly ash from all three units. The fl y ash and other particul ates are collected in hoppers. The fly ash from Unit 6 is wet sluiced to the plant’s ash pond. The fly ash from Units 7 and 8 is pneumatically conveyed to storage silos. Miami Fort sells most of the ash to Ready Mix. Any fly ash that the plant cannot sell is transferred to their la ndfill located approximately three miles away, which is owned by Duke Energy. [QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: Is the landfill operated by Duke Energy?] Yes?

Miami Fort previously had issues with blue plume from the stack, associated with sulfur trioxide emissions. The plant now injects lime into the flue gas between the air heater and the

ESP to control the sulfur trioxide emissions.

Miami Fort operates an ash pond with two adj acent cells operated in series. Fly ash from

Unit 6 and bottom ash from all three units are slui ced to the cell nearest the plant. Polymer is added to the ash pond near where the sluicing pi pes deposit the ash sluice to improve total suspended solids (TSS) removals. The plant operates the first cell using equipment to maintain channels for the sluice water to move through th e mass of ash solids coll ected in the pond (i.e., the rim ditch stacking method). The plant removes the solids that settle out in the channels of the ash pond and stacks them in piles along the perimete r of the ash channels to allow the solids to dewater, while the water drains back into th e pond. After the solids ha ve been dewatered, the plant hauls them to the landfill for disposal. In ad dition to fly ash and bottom ash transport water, the ash pond also receives treated FGD wastewater and mill rejects. The ash pond discharges to

the Ohio River via Outfall 002.2-2 Unit 6 at Miami Fort has the following configuration:

Boiler; Air heater; Lime injection; and No lime injection for U6

ESP.

Units 7 and 8 at Miami Fort ha ve the following configuration:

Boiler; SCR system; Air heater; Lime injection; ESP; and FGD scrubber system.

2.1 FGD Scrubber Systems

Miami Fort operates two identical wet FGD sc rubber systems that treat the flue gas from Units 7 and 8. The plant uses limesto ne slurry as the sorbent for SO 2 absorption. Limestone and service water are fed to on-site ball mills, whic h pulverize the limestone to create the slurry. From the ball mills, the slurry is transferred to hydrocyclones to collect limestone particles that are too large to use in the FGD scrubber sy stem. The underflow from the hydrocyclones is returned to the ball mills for additional proce ssing. The overflow from the hydrocyclones, which is between 20 and 30 percent solid s (by weight), is transferred to the limestone slurry feed tank and used as fresh limestone slurry in the absorber. In addition to the limestone to create slurry we also use the lime residual (City of Hamilt on water treatment plant - byproduct from the lime softening process)? About 10% of the slurry for both units comes from this process.

The fresh limestone slurry is fed to the r eaction tank of the FGD system and the recycle pumps transfer the slurry to the various levels of the FGD scrubber (typi cally two of the three spray levels are operating at one time). The slurry is pressurized and sprayed downward into the scrubber vessel through the spray nozzles. As th e slurry falls downward and the flue gas flows countercurrent to the slurry, the spray droplets of the limestone slurry contact the flue gas and

absorb the SO 2 , which reacts with the limestone particle s and produces calcium sulfite. The spray droplets flow downward until they se ttle on the first of two dual flow trays, forming a layer of slurry that the flue gas must pass through to exit the FGD system. The tray has small holes in it that allow the flue gas to bubble through the limestone slurry la yered on the tray, which provides additional contact between the limestone slurry a nd the flue gas. The spray droplets fall to the second dual flow tray and then continue to flow downward in the scrubb er until they reach the

reaction tank. Miami Fort bubbles air through the reaction tank to oxidize the calcium sulfite to calcium sulfate (i.e., gypsum).

Miami Fort operates the FGD systems at a pH of 5 S.U. and adjusts the limestone slurry feed rate to maintain this pH. We usually run in "Removal Mode" which adjusts slurry feed rate to maintain a set SO2 removal percentage (97%) and the pH follows. In addition, the plant operates the system to maintain a solids concentration in the scr ubber of 21 to 24 percent weight

solids. When the solids concentration exceeds 24 percent, the plant blows down some of the2-3 gypsum slurry from the scrubber. Miami Fort al so blows down some of the gypsum slurry to

control the chlorides concentrati on. The chlorides concentration in the scrubbers is maintained at approximately 5,000 to 10,000 parts per million (ppm), with a design maximum chlorides concentration of 12,000 ppm. Miam i Fort transfers the blowdown from the scrubbers to the gypsum dewatering operations.

Each FGD system has its own gypsum dewate ring equipment; therefore, the Unit 7 and 8 gypsum and wastewater are not commingled until the FGD wastewater treatment system. The gypsum slurry for each scrubber is pumped to its primary hydrocyclone, where the solid gypsum is separated from the water by centrifugal force. Th e solid gypsum is forced outward to the walls of the hydrocyclones and falls downward, while the water exits the top of the hydrocyclones. The gypsum from the primary hydrocyclones is tran sferred to the vacuum belt filters for final dewatering. The overflow from the primary hydr ocyclones is transferred to secondary hydrocyclones. The overflow from the second hydrocyclones is transferred to the FGD wastewater treatment system. Th e underflow from the secondary hydrocyclones is sent to the reclaim tank, which is shared be tween the two units, a nd is reused in the process as make-up

water. Not shared. Each unit has its own reclaim tank.

 As the gypsum is applied to the vacu um belt filters, Miami Fort washes the gypsum with service water to reduce th e chlorides in the gypsum to less than 100 ppm. The vacuum belt filters dry the gypsum to a moisture content of less than nine percent. The gypsum produced at the plant is then sold. [QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: To what industries is the gypsum sold?] Marketed to Lafarge (wallboard manufacturer) or agri cultural (either off-spec or if Lafarge refuses product)

2.2 FGD Wastewater Treatment System

The Miami Fort FGD wastewater treatment system is designed to receive intermittent transfers of wastewater (seconda ry hydrocyclone overflow) from the FGD system at a maximum design flow rate of 200 gallons per minute (gpm). The actual flow rate through the system averages 150 gpm over a 24-hour period. The F GD wastewater treatment system, designed by Infilco Degremont, is a chemical precipitation treatment system and contains the following treatment operations:

Equalization and pH adjustment (lime addition); Ferric chloride and organosulfide addition; Polymer addition; and

Clarification.

Figure 2-1, located at the end of this secti on, presents the process flow diagram of the FGD wastewater treatment syst em, as well as the planned sampling locations for EPA’s sampling episode.

The secondary hydrocyclone overflow from the scrubbers is transferred directly to the equalization tank at the beginning of the wastew ater treatment system. This wastewater is expected to contain 2.5 to 3.0 per cent solids and have a pH of approximately 5 S.U. Miami Fort2-4 adds lime to the equalization tank to raise the pH in the tank to between 8.4 and 8.6 S.U. to precipitate the soluble metals as insoluble hydroxides and oxy hydroxides. To desaturate the gypsum, some of the sludge from the downstream clar ifiers is recycled b ack to the equalization tank to provide seed crystals for gypsum nucleation. We do not recycle. The equalization tank also receives water from the wastewater treatment building sump, which primarily consists of filter press filtrate, and flush water from the flushing of the sludge lines.

From the equalization tank, the wastewater enters the coagulation tank, where ferric chloride and organosulfide are added. The ferri c chloride assists in coagulating the solids precipitated in the equali zation tank, as well as promoting iron coprecipitation of some residual metals in the wastewater. The organosulfide is ad ded to precipitate residual metals as sulfide complexes. At the time of the presampling site vis it, Miami Fort stated that they were testing the Nalco Nalmet® 1689 organosulfide in the FGD wast ewater treatment system in place of TMT 15®. Miami Fort is testing the effectiveness of the Nalmet® 1689 by adjusting the feed rate and addition amounts, in combination with other FGD wastewater treatment additives (i.e., polymer, ferric chloride). The plant stated that the Nalmet® 1689 looks promising and has effectively lowered mercury levels. Plant personnel stated that using Nalmet® 1689 has almost eliminated

the need to add ferric chloride to the wastewater treatment syst em. During the presampling site visit, EPA requested that the plant have the wastewater treatment system as optimized as possible and operating under stable conditions at the time of the sa mpling episode (i.e., the plant is not fluctuating the chemical feed rates to test the performance of the system).

Flow from the coagulation tank splits into two parallel stream s that flow to two DensaDeg® clarifiers. This type of clarifier ha s an initial reactor se ction, where polymer is added for coagulation and flocculation to improve solids removals. From the reactor section, the wastewater enters the clarification/thickening secti on of the clarifier, where the solids settle out of the wastewater. As discussed previously, so me of the sludge from the two clarifiers is recycled back to the equalization tank to provide seed crystals for gypsum nucleation. No recycle. The remainder of the sludge is transferred to the sludge holding tank and then processed through the filter presses. The filtrate from the f ilter presses is collect ed in the wastewater treatment building sump and recycled to the equa lization tank. The sludge fr om the filter presses is hauled off site for disposal at a landfill. [QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: Is the wastewater treatment sludge sent to th e same landfill as the ash?] No

The clarified wastewater from the two DensaD eg® clarifiers is combined in the effluent tank. The wastewater is pumped to the ash pond and discharged via Outf all 002. The transfers to the ash pond are based on level control within the effluent tank and are th erefore not continuous.2-5Figure 2-1.Chemical Precipitaiton FGD WastewaterTreatment System, Miami Fort Station3-1 3. S AMPLING P ROCEDURES

This section discusses th e planned sampling procedures to be followed during the sampling episode at Miami Fort. This section also provides the necessary information to plan for the logistics of this sampling episode. All tables and figures in this sect ion are presented at the

end of the section.

3.1 Sampling Point Selection

EPA selected the following five sampling point s, including treatment system influent and effluent sampling locations for the FGD wastewater treatment system as well as the related to Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) samples:

SP-1 Influent to the FGD Wa stewater Treatment System;

SP-2 Effluent from the FGD Wa stewater Treatment System;

SP-3 Duplicate of Effluent from the FGD Wastewater Treatment System (SP2);

SP-4 Influent to the FGD Wastewater Tr eatment System (SP-1) Field Blank;

and

SP-5 Effluent from the F GD Wastewater Treatment Sy stem (SP-2) Field Blank.

3.2 Analyte Selection

Analytes that will be included in EPA’s Miam i Fort sampling episode include those in the following classes of pollutants:

 Classicals:

— Biochemical oxygen demand, 5-day (BOD 5 ),

— Chemical oxygen demand (COD),

— Total suspended solids (TSS),

— Total dissolved solids (TDS),

— Sulfate,

— Chloride,

— Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN),

— Ammonia as nitrogen,

— Nitrate/nitrite as nitrogen,

— Total phosphorus,

— Total cyanide;

 Total metals:

— Aluminum, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, boron, cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper , iron, lead, magnesium, manganese,3-2 mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, silver, sodium, thallium, tin, titanium, vanadium, and zinc; and

 Dissolved metals:

— Same parameters as listed for total metals, plus hexavalent chromium.

The analytes selected for analysis reflect the current understanding of coal-fired power plant FGD wastewaters, including contributi ons from coal, scrubbe r sorbents, treatment chemicals, and other sources. Table 3-1 lists the potential analytes for each sampling point, Table 3-2 lists the analytical methods that will be us ed, and Table 3-3 lists the sample container and volume and planned on-site preservation for each parameter or parameter group.

3.3 Sample Collection Procedures

To characterize the influent to the FGD wa stewater treatment system (SP-1) and the

effluent from the FGD wastewat er treatment system (SP-2) at Miami Fort, the sampling team will use varying methods to collect the samples depending on the sampling point and pollutant parameters. This subsection describes in detail the sample collection techniques.

Samples are collected as a se ries of “fractions,” or bottl es designated for particular analyses requiring the same preservation. The co mprehensive sample set consists of sample fractions for all pollutant classes listed in Sect ion 3.2. Note that some sample fractions will be collected in the same sample bottl e, such as Group I analytes (T SS, TDS, sulfate, and chloride) and Group II analytes (ammonia as nitrogen, COD, nitrate/nitrit e as nitrogen, TKN, and total phosphorus).

In general, samplers will work in teams of two to ensure that proper sampling techniques are followed and adequate notes are taken at each sampling location. Samplers will wear disposable gloves, Tyvek® suits, masks (when sampling for mercury by EPA Method 1631E), steel-toed boots, hard hats, and safety eyew ear, and will observe precautions while collecting samples, remaining aware of their surroundings. The masks are used during sampling to prevent contamination of the mercury samples and ar e not required for re spiratory protection.

Sample containers and bottles will be pur chased precleaned and certified and will not require rinsing with sample. ERG will follow prot ocols described in EPA Method 1669 to collect metal sample fractions. All sampling equipment (e .g., tubing) and sample bottles will be cleaned according to the procedures described in EP A Method 1669. Samplers will use “clean hands / dirty hands” sample collection t echniques when collecting metal sa mple fractions, as described

in EPA Method 1669.

For this sampling episode, ERG will collect in dividual grab samples at the influent to the FGD wastewater treatment system sampling point for all analytes. At the effluent from the FGD wastewater treatment system, ERG will collect 24-hour composite samples for most analytes; however, cyanide will be collected as a single grab sample and mercury will be collected as four grab samples. ERG will collect one sample at each sampling point each day over four consecutive 24-hour periods (mercury will be coll ected as four grab samples each day for the

effluent from the FGD wa stewater treatment syst em sampling point).3-3 Samplers will take care not to touch the insides of bottles or lids/caps during sampling. Samples that require cooling to ≤ 6  C for preservation will be cooled immediately in an ice-water bath and then placed into coolers containing ba gged ice throughout sample storage, shipment, and receipt at the analytical laboratories.

3.3.1 Influent to the FGD Wastewat er Treatment System (SP-1)

The influent to the FGD wastewater tr eatment system (SP-1) has a sample tap located on the piping from the secondary hydroc yclone to the equalization tank. ERG will collect the sample prior to the wastewater entering the equalization tank because the plant adds lime directly to the equalization tank and, therefore, the sampling point upstream of the tank provides the best representation of th e FGD scrubber purge from the Miami Fort FGD system. Because the flow into the equaliza tion tank is not continuous, ERG will need to coordinate closely with Miami Fort personne l during the sampling episode to determine when grab samples can be collected (i.e., when wastewater is being transferred to the FGD wastewater treatment system). Miami Fort will install a 3/8 inch hose barb on this tap in order to collect samples. [QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: Please confirm that the plant

will be able to install a 3/8 in ch hose barb on the tap for EPA to attach the sample tubing.]

Dave Cooper from Synmat can take care of this. The ball valve on the top of the tank is a CPVC plastic valve (I think it is 1” female pipe thread) It would be good to have check the valve size and

then get a 1”

, 3⁄4”

, 1⁄2” and 3/8” barb connection. This sample location has solids that may plug up

a 3/8” so having larger spares on hand would be helpful. The CPVC fittings can be purchased at

Lowes in Florence or through our MRO supplier Pipe Products. I can work with Dave Cooper if he

has any questions. (From Joe Potts) ERG will follow protocols described in EPA Met hod 1669 to collect metal sample fractions from

SP-1.

The sample point for the influent to the F GD wastewater treatment system is located on the pipe between the secondary hydrocyclone an d equalization tank, and is only accessible from the top of the equalization tank. ER G plans to take samples directly from the tap on the top of the equalization tank. ERG will set up the sampli ng equipment on top of the equalization tank to collect the samples. ERG will place “no slip” mats on the top of the tank as a safety precaution. [QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: Are there any poten tial safety hazards associated with the vent located on the top of the equalization tank?] There is no hazard from the tank vent. The tank operates at atmospheric pressure and this is the atmospheric vent. The vapor is water, as long as the temp is above freezing there is no ha zard. The sample tubing is a good idea as a backup but may be subject to plugging. Also their backup plan to collect a duplicate sample if a split does not work is acceptable. (From Joe Potts) In case there is heavy rain during the sampling ep isode or other conditions that make collecting the sample from the top of the equalization tank unsafe, ERG will have sample tubing sets available to attach the tubing to the tap on the top of the equalization tank, but will have the tubing run to the ground level where the samples will be collected.

ERG plans to collect split samples with Miami Fort (or its representative), where possible; therefore, ERG plans to attach a piece of silicone tubing to the sample tap with a “Y” splitter at the other end of the tubing to allow ERG and Miam i Fort (or its representative) to collect samples simultaneously. If problems occu r during the collection of split samples (e.g., the3-4 splitters become clogged and the flow is split unevenly between the sampling crews), then EPA may stop the split sample collection and offer in stead to collect duplicate samples with Miami Fort or its representative. For all analyses (exc ept dissolved metals and hexavalent chromium), the samplers will collect samples through the tubi ng directly into the specified containers. For the dissolved metals (excluding mercury) and hexa valent chromium samples, the samplers will fill one 10-L container, allow the solids to sett le for one hour, and then pump the aqueous portion of the sample through a 0.45- μ m filter and then through a “Y” splitter into the specified containers; therefore, the dissolved metals and he xavalent chromium sample s will be collected as split samples.

The influent sample at Miami Fort is exp ected to contain approxi mately 2.5 to 3.0 percent suspended solids. If the TSS content of the sa mple is greater than one percent, then the laboratory will separate the aqueous and solid por tions of the sample and analyze both for the analyte of interest (i.e., biphasic samples). In this instance, Group I (chl oride and sulfate only), Group II (ammonia as nitrogen, nitrate/nitrite as nitrogen, and total phos phorus only), and total metals (including mercury, but not hexavalent chro mium because it is filtered in the field during sample collection) samples will be analyzed as biphasic samples. Group I (TSS, and TDS only), Group II (COD only), BOD 5 , hexavalent chromium, and dissolv ed metals (including mercury) samples will not be analyzed as biphasic samples. Scrubber purge samples with less than one percent TSS will not require biphasic separation and analysis.

The samples for the influent to the FGD wa stewater treatment system (SP-1) will be collected from a sample tap. The sampling equipment will consist of the following:

Colorless, electronic-gr ade, non-nitrile gloves; Silicone tubing with “Y” splitter; 10-L containers; Teflon® tubing; Silicone tubing;

0.45- μ m filter; Funnel; Peristaltic pump; Small table; Cleanbox; Tyvek® suits (for metals samples); Masks (for mercury samples); and Sample containers.

All metals sampling equipment will be speci ally cleaned according to the procedures

described in EPA Method 1669. ERG will follow protocols described in EPA Method 1669 to collect metal sample fractions. Two or more ER G samplers (“clean hands” and “dirty hands”) will follow the protocols described in the steps below to set up the sampling point, collect the3-5 field blank samples, and collect wastewater samp les. This section describes the set-up of the sample point and collection of the EPA samples 1

.

1. Samplers remove the bags containing the gloves and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic wrap from the coolers or storage containers in which they are packed. Samplers identify which cool ers or boxes contai n the double-bagged sample bottles, precleaned tubing, bla nk water, and cleanbox. Depending on the condition of the sample tap, samplers may n eed to wipe the tap with a clean paper towel to remove any buildup on the tap that could potentially fall in the sample bottles during sample collection.

2. Both samplers put on Tyvek® suits, ma sks, and gloves. “Dirty hands” covers work surfaces (ground or table) with HDPE plastic wrap and places the doublebagged sample bottles within easy access on the covered surface.

3. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the cleanbox and “clean hands” opens the inner bag. “Clean hands” places the cleanbox at the point of sample collection and secures it open with the c lips located inside the box.

4. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag cont aining a length of pr ecleaned silicone tubing. “Clean hands” opens the inner ba g inside of the cleanbox, removes the tubing, and places clean plastic bags ove r the ends of the silicone tubing.

5. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the funnel and “clean hands” opens the inner bag inside of the cleanbox and attaches the funnel to the tubing.

6. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bags of the mercury field blank water and total mercury field blank sample bottles. “Cl ean hands” opens the inner bag for the field blank water, unscrews the lid and places it in the inner bag. “Clean hands” passes the funnel end of the tubing with a plastic bag shrouding the funnel to another “clean hands” person to hold outside the cleanbox. “Clean hands” removes the inner bag for the total mercur y field blank sample bottle and places it

in the cleanbox. “Clean hands” holds the end of the silicone tubing outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with the plastic bag still cove ring the end of the tubing. “Dirty hands” pours field blank water through the funnel and tubing. After the tubing has been purged with sufficient vol ume, “clean hands” places the silicone tubing back in the cleanbox. Worki ng inside the cleanbox, “clean hands” unscrews the lid of the field blank samp le bottle, removes the tubing from the plastic bag, and prepares to fill the field blank sample bottle. “Dirty hands” pours

field blank water into the funnel and t ubing, and “clean hands” fills the total mercury field blank sample bottle. “Clean hands” places the e nd of the silicone tubing into the plastic bag, replaces the lid on the sample bottle, and closes the inner bag. “Clean hands” removes the bottle from the cleanbox and places it in the

1 For the sample collection, the samples will be split with th e plant (or the plant’s representative) and, therefore, the sample set-up describes equipment needed for split samples. However, EPA is not responsible for the collection of the split samples by the plant and, therefore, the collectio n of the plant’s samples is not described in this plan.3-6 outer bag. “Dirty hands” clos es the outer bag. The sample rs repeat this procedure for the total metals field blank samples 2

.

7. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag for a precleaned 10-L contai ner. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and loosens the li d. “Clean hands” holds the end of the silicone tubing at the mouth of the 10-L container and removes the lid. “Dirty hands” pours field blank water through th e funnel and tubing, and “clean hands” fills the 10-L container with enough fiel d blank water to collect the dissolved metals field blank samples. “Clean hands” places the lid back on the 10-L container, places the plastic bag over the end of the silicone tubing, and places the tubing in the cleanbox. “Clean hands” scre ws the lid on the 10-L container and closes the inner bag. “Dirty hands” closes the outer bag of the 10-L container.

8. After collecting the field blank samples, “clean hands” removes the funnel from the tubing. “Clean hands” and “dirty hands” wo rk to attach the e nd of the silicone tubing to the sample tap.

9. “Clean hands” holds the opposite end of the silicone tubing outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with the plas tic bag covering the end of the tubing. “Dirty hands” opens the valve to the sample tap to pur ge the piping for a minimum of 2 minutes. “Clean hands” places the end of the silicone tubing back in the cleanbox.

10. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag for a precleaned 10-L contai ner. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and loosens the li d. “Clean hands” holds the end of the silicone tubing at the mouth of the 10-L container and removes the lid. “Dirty hands” opens the sample valve to allow sample to flow into the 10-L container. “Clean hands” fills the 10-L container with sample to be analyzed for dissolved metals and hexavalent chromium, which is required to be filtered for these analyses. The samplers will allow the solid s to settle for one hour while collecting the remaining samples. “Clean hands” pl aces the lid back on the 10-L container, places the plastic bag over the end of the silicone tubing, and places the tubing

into the cleanbox. ”Clean hands” screws the lid on the 10-L container and closes the inner bag. “Dirty hands” closes the out er bag of the 10-Liter container. Both samplers change their gloves.

11. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag for the total mercury sample bottle. “Clean hands” removes the inner bag and bottle and places it in the cleanbox. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and bottle lid. “Clean hands” removes the plastic bag from the tubing and fills the sample bottl e. “Clean hands” places the tubing back in the plastic bag, replaces the lid on the sample bottle and closes the inner bag. “Clean hands” removes the sample bottl e from the cleanbox and places it in the

2 ERG will collect field blank samples at the influent to the FGD wastewater treatment system during only one day of the sampling episode. Additionally, ERG will collect the dissolved mercury sample using the same technique as the total mercury sample, but the dissolved sample will be filtered at the laboratory. A dissolved mercury field blank sample will be analyzed by the laboratory to assess any mercury contamination from the filtering performed at the laboratory. Therefore, ERG does not need to collect a dissolved mercury field bl ank sample in the field.3-7 outer bag. “Dirty hands” clos es the outer bag. The sample rs repeat this procedure for the dissolved mercury and total metals samples.

12. “Dirty hands” places an ERG label on the outer bags of the sample bottles.

13. Samplers fill a 1-L jar for the field meas urements. The samplers will give the jar to another sampling team member to measure the temperature and pH.

14. Both samplers collect the BOD 5 , Group I, Group II, and total cyanide samples from the sample location. The samplers need to test the total cyanide samples for sulfides and oxidants and preserve th e samples immediately after sample collection, according to the preservati on protocols outlined in Section 3.4.

Dissolved Metals Sample Collection

15. Samplers allow the 10-L sample container to continue to settle if one hour has not elapsed since the sample was collected.

16. “Dirty hands” covers the work surfaces (ground or table) with HDPE plastic wrap and places the double-bagged sample bottl es within easy access on the covered

surface.

17. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the clean box and “clean hands” opens the inner bag. “Clean hands” places the clea nbox at the point of sample collection. “Clean hands” secures the cleanbox open with the clips located inside the box.

18. “Dirty hands” opens the opening on the peri staltic pump head so the tubing can be placed in the pump head. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag containing a length of precleaned Teflon® tubing attached to a 5-foot length of pr ecleaned silicone tubing, a “Y” splitter, and two additional pieces of precleaned silicone tubing. “Clean hands” moves the tubing into the cleanbox, opens the inner bag, and removes the tubing. “Clean hands” places a cl ean plastic bag over the ends of the Teflon® and silicone tubing.

19. “Dirty hands” threads the silicone tu bing into the peristaltic pump head.

20. Both samplers change gloves.

21. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of a capsule filter. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and removes the capsule filter. “C lean hands” attaches the capsule filter to the silicone tubing just before the “Y” splitter.

22. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the 10-L container that wa s used to collect

the field blank water for the dissolved me tals fractions. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag of the 10-L container. “Clean hands” removes the Teflon® tubing from the cleanbox, opens the lid of the 10-L plastic container, removes the plastic bag from the Teflon® tubing, and places the Teflon® tubing into the 10-L container.3-8 “Dirty hands” opens the dissolved metals field blank sample bottle. “Clean hands”

removes the dissolved metals field bla nk sample bottle and places it in the

cleanbox. “Clean hands” holds the end of the silicone tubing outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with the plas tic bag still covering the e nd of the tubing and “dirty hands” operates the pump to pump about 750 mL of blank water from the field blank water bottle. “Clean hands” places the end of the silicone tubing in the cleanbox, opens the inner bag of the dissolv ed metals field blank sample bottle, and removes the lid. “Dirty hands” operat es the pump to collect the dissolved metals field blank sample and then stops the pump. The samplers repeat the procedure for the dissolved metals and he xavalent chromium field blank samples. If a new filter is needed, “clean hands” removes the used filter and samplers follow step 21 to replace the filter 3

.

23. Both samplers change gloves.

24. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of one of the 10-L containers. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag, removes the lid, a nd places the end of the Teflon® tubing

into the container. “Clean hands” holds th e end of the silicone tubing outside the cleanbox, with the plastic bag still coveri ng the end of the tubing. “Dirty hands” starts the pump and passes approximately 750 mL through the tubing and filter and then stops the pump.

25. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the dissolved metals sample bottle. “Clean hands” removes the inner bag and bottle and places it in the cleanbox. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and removes the lid. “Dirty hands ” operates the pump to collect the dissolved metals sample and then stops the pump. “Clean hands” closes the lid on the sample bottle and cl oses the inner bag. “Clean hands” places the inner bag and bottle in the outer bag and “dirty ha nds” closes the outer bag. The samplers repeat this procedure fo r the dissolved metals and hexavalent chromium samples.

26. “Dirty hands” places an ERG label on the outer bags of the sample bottles.

EPA plans to collect samples at the influent to the FGD wastewater treatment system (SP-1) on four consecutive days. The sample collection setup and sampling technique for each day of sampling will be the same.

3.3.2 Effluent from the FGD Wastewat er Treatment System (SP-2)

The effluent from the FGD wastewater treatm ent system (SP-2) will be collected from a tap located on the discharge side of the pump that transfers the wastewater from the effluent tank to the ash pond. The current fitting on the sample tap is too large for ER G’s tubing to fit on the tap. Miami Fort personnel stated that a smaller ho se barb could be placed on the sample tap that

3 ERG will collect field blank samples at the influent to the FGD wastewater treatment system during only one day of the sampling episode.3-9 would fit the ERG sample tubing configurati on. ERG will follow protocols described in EPA

Method 1669 to collect metal sa mple fractions from SP-2.

ERG will collect the effluent from the F GD wastewater treatment system composite samples using two automatic compositors that w ill be programmed to collect individual sample volumes into two large containers (e.g., two 20-lit er HPDE containers). To collect sufficient sample volume, ERG will calculate the total volum e required for ERG sample collection as well as plant split sample collection and also add additional volume for purging tubing and contingencies. The volume will then be programme d to be collected in one-hour intervals during the 24-hour composite period. Following the com posite period, ERG will pump off the specific sample volumes into the individual sample containers.

ERG will use one automatic compositor to coll ect sample volume for the metals analyses (excluding mercury) and another automatic compos itor to collect sample volume for all classical analytes (i.e., BOD 5 , Group I, and Group II). In addition to collecting automatic composite samples for the analytes listed above, ERG will co llect total and dissolved mercury grab samples every six hours during each compositing period. ERG will also collect one grab sample for cyanide during each compositing period.

1. As described previously, Miami Fo rt does not transfer wastewater continuously from the effluent tank to the as h pond; therefore, there could be issues ensuring that enough volume is collected ba sed on a time-weighted composite if there is no wastewater flowing through the sample collection lines during certain periods of the sample collection. To avoid th is issue, Miami Fort stated that they can adjust the speed of the pumps during th e sampling episode to ensure that there

is a continuous transfer from the efflue nt tank to the ash pond. [QUESTION FOR

MIAMI FORT: Please confirm there will be continuous flow from the effluent tank to the ash pond during the sampling episode.] Pg 22 has several questions on how to

get a steady flow for the effluent sample. Perhaps Steve Chipman can double check with

Synmat to see if they are OK with adjusting the pump speed to obtain a steady flow for 4

or 5 days. I will also check to see if there is a place where we could put a sample tap on
the tank or the suction line on one of the pumps. If that is easy to do it would be handy

for this test and for future use. (From Joe Potts) After talking to Steve Chipman and Chris Noonan (Synmat Supervisor) there is no way to get continuous flow from the pumps. Looking at using a small tap off the effluent tank (drain line) to a sump to get continuous flow for the sampling even t. Or they can pull a sample from the densadeg overflows which is continuous , gravity fed into the effluent tank.

ERG has two approaches for collecting the total and dissolved me rcury grab samples; however, the approach used will depend on how Miami Fort is able to configure the sample taps. The preferred approach for the mercury collection is to have a third tap available at the sampling point (i.e., one tap for the metals compositor, on e tap for the classicals compositor, and one tap for mercury grab samples). If Miami Fort can accommodate this configuration, then ERG will collect the total and dissolved mercury grab samples by shrouding the third sample tap and3-10 collecting the samples directly from the tap. If th is configuration is not possible, then ERG will collect the samples from the composite tubing line that discharges to the sump/drain, described in more detail in the steps below. For both of these collection approaches , ERG will not be able to collect split samples with Miami Fort (or its representative); therefore, duplicate samples will

be collected.

[QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: Would the plant be able to set up the sample tap to have a three-way splitter attached with each splitter having a 3/8 inch hose barb and having its own valve to control flow?] Synmat should be able to support this sample tap configuration. (See

Joe Potts previous comments about sample taps)

When pumping off the composite samples that have been collected, a “Y” splitter will be used with two pieces of silicone tubing attached to the “Y” splitter to allow ERG and Miami Fort (or its representative) to collect samples simu ltaneously. If problems o ccur during the collection of split samples (e.g., the splitters become clogged and the flow is split unevenly between the sampling crews), then EPA may stop the split sa mple collection and offer instead to collect duplicate samples with Miami Fort (or its representative).

For all analytes, ERG will collect QC samples at the effluent from the FGD wastewater treatment system (SP-2) during one day of the sampling episode. In addition, for all analytes, ERG will collect a duplicate sample of the efflue nt from the FGD wastewater treatment system (SP-3) during one day of the sampling episode.

The sample of the effluent from the FGD wastewater treatment system (SP-2) will be collected from a sample tap. The sampling equipment will consist of the following:

 Colorless, electronic-gr ade, non-nitrile gloves;

 Peristaltic pump (automatic compositor – battery powered);

 Large composite containers (e.g., 20-liter containers);

 Funnel;

 “Y” splitter;

 “T” splitter;

 Teflon® tubing;

 Silicone tubing;

 0.45- μ m filter;

 Cleanbox;

 Tyvek® suits (for metals samples);

 Masks (for mercury samples); and

 Sample containers.

All metals sampling equipment will be speci ally cleaned according to the procedures described in EPA Method 1669. The supplier of the cleaned bottles, tubing, and composite containers will prepare and analyze bottle blanks and equipment blanks to evaluate possible contamination. ERG will follow protocols desc ribed in EPA Method 1669 to collect metal sample fractions. Two or more ERG samplers (“ clean hands” and “dirty hands”) will follow the protocols described in the step s below to set up the sampling point, collect the field blank3-11 samples, and collect wastewater samples. This section describes the set- up of the sample point and collection of the EPA samples 4

.

1. Samplers remove the bags containing th e gloves and HDPE plastic wrap from the coolers or storage containers in which th ey are packed. Samplers identify which coolers or boxes contain the double-bagge d composite containers, precleaned tubing, blank water, and cleanbox.

Both samplers put on Tyvek® suits, masks, and gloves. “Dirty hands” covers work surfaces (ground or table) with HDPE plastic wrap and places the double-bagged composite containers within easy access on the covered surface.

“Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of th e cleanbox and “clean hands” opens the clear inner bag. “Clean hands” places the clea nbox at the point of sample collection. “Clean hands” opens the cleanbox and s ecures it open with the clips located

inside the box.

4. “Dirty hands” opens up the peristaltic pump portion of the automatic compositor so the tubing can be added. “Dirty hands ” opens the outer bag containing a length of precleaned silicone tubing, a “T” splitter, and two additional pieces of silicone tubing. “Clean hands” takes the inner bag containing the tubing and moves it into the cleanbox. “Clean hands” opens the i nner bag and removes the tubing. “Clean hands” places a clean plastic bag over each end of the silicone tubing. The tubing configuration will be set up such that one end will be connected to the sample tap,

one end will be threaded through the automatic compositor and connected to the large composite container, and one end w ill be placed next to a sump/drain near the sampling point. To collect the samples, the sample tap will be left open during the entire sample collection time period a nd will flow directly to the sump/drain; however, the automatic compositor will pull sample from the flowing stream as dictated by the sampling program. Additionally, the automatic compositor will be capable of purging the line back to th e flowing stream between each individual sample aliquot.

5. “Dirty hands” threads one portion of th e silicone tubing through the peristaltic pump portion of the au tomatic compositor.

6. Both samplers change gloves.

7. “Dirty hands” and “clean hands” then colle ct the total mercury field blank sample. The total mercury field blank sample collection will depend on the sampling configuration for mercury, so both configurations are de scribed in this plan.

4 For the sample collection, the samples will be split with th e plant (or the plant’s repres entative) and therefore, the sample set-up describes equipment needed for split samples. However, EPA is not responsible for the collection of the split samples by the plant and therefore, the co llection of the plant’s samples is not described.3-12 Collection from third sample tap : “Dirty hands” shrouds the sample tap with a clear plastic bag that covers the end of the sample tap and provides enough room for samplers to work in with their hands . “Dirty hands” then opens the outer bag of the mercury field blank water and the total mercury field blank sample bottle. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag for th e field blank water and the total mercury field blank sample bottle, unscrews the lid s, and places each in its inner bags. “Clean hands” pours the field blank wate r into the field blank sample bottle, closes the lids, and closes the inner ba gs. “Clean hands” places the total mercury field blank sample bottle in the outer bag and “dirty hands” closes the outer bag.

Collection from compositor tubi ng discharging to sump/drain : “Dirty hands” places the end of the silicone tubing in a plastic ring stand clamp to keep the tubing off the floor and shrouds the end of the silicone tubing with a clear plastic bag that covers the end of the tubing and provides enough room for samplers to work in with their hands. “Dirty hands” threads tubing after the “T” splitter through a peristaltic pump and then opens th e outer bag of the mercury field blank water and the total mercury field blank sample bottle. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag for the field blank water, unscre ws the lid, places it in the inner bag and places the end of the silicone tubing into blank water. “Dirty hands” operates the pump to pump blank water through the tu bing. After the tubing has been purged with sufficient volume, “clean hands” holds the total mercury field blank sample bottle under the shrouded tubing and opens the inner bag. “Dirty hands” operates the pump to collect the total mercury fiel d blank sample. “Clean hands” closes the lid on the sample bottle, closes the inne r bag, and places the bottle in the outer bag. “Dirty hands” closes the outer bag. “Dirty hands” removes the tubing from the peristaltic pump.

8. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of th e metals field blank water and the field blank composite container. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag for the field blank water, unscrews the lid, and places it in the inner bag. “Clean hands” then places one end of the silicone tubing into the bl ank water. “Clean hands” also opens the inner bag for the field blank composite container and loosen s the lid. “Clean hands” holds the silicone tubing with the plastic bag covering the end out of the cleanbox and over a bucket and “dirty hands ” operates the pump to pump blank water through the tubing. After the tu bing has been purged with sufficient volume, “clean hands” holds the silicone tubing at the mouth of the field blank composite container and fills the composite container with sufficient volume to

collect the total and dissolved metals fi eld blank samples at the pump-off location. “Dirty hands” stops the pump. During the purging of the tubing and collection of the field blank sample volume, “dirty ha nds” holds the end of the silicone tubing that will be placed by the sump/drain a bove the composite container to prevent this portion of the tubing configuration from filling with blank water during the pumping process. “Clean hands” places the plastic bag over the end of the silicone tubing, replaces the lid on the field blank composite container, places the silicone tubing back in the cleanbox, and closes th e inner bag of the fi eld blank composite3-13 container. “Dirty hands” closes the out er bag of the field blank composite

container 5

.

9. Both samplers work together to move the sampling tubing, automatic compositor, and composite containers into position for the sample collection. Samplers will ensure that the tubing will stay in pl ace during the 24-hour sample collection period.

10. “Dirty hands” changes gloves.

11. “Clean hands” holds the e nd of the silicone tubing outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with the plastic bag still coveri ng the end of the tubi ng. “Dirty hands” places the end of the silicone tubing near the sump/drain and opens the sample tap

valve to allow the wastewater to flow through the tubing. “Dirty hands” operates the pump to purge the pump portion of th e tubing for a mini mum of 2 minutes.

12. Samplers fill a 1-L jar for the field meas urements. The samplers will give the jar to another sampling team member to measure the temperature and pH.

13. “Dirty hands” programs the automatic co mpositor to collect the 20 liters of sample over a 24-hour time period in one- hour intervals (i.e., collect 833 mL of sample every hour). “Dirty hands” calib rates the compositor to ensure that approximately 833 mL is collected for each individual grab.

14. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the large composite container. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and connects the silicone tubing to the port on the composite container, securing the connec tion with a cable tie. “Clean hands” closes the inner bag around the composite bottle, and “dirty hands” closes the outer bag. The samplers put ice around the composite container to keep the samples cold during the compositing time period.

15. Samplers repeat steps 1-14 to set up th e automatic compositor for the classical analytes (skipping steps 7 and 8). Samplers will use another com posite container.

16. “Clean hands” and “dirty hands” work to collect a total mercury grab sample. The total mercury sample collection technique will depend on the sampling configuration at the sample tap, so both potential collec tion techniques are described in this plan.

Collection from third sample tap : “Dirty hands” positions a bucket under the sample tap, opens the valve, and purges the valve for at least one minute, and then closes the tap. Dirty hands” then opens th e outer bag of the total mercury sample

bottle. “Clean hands” takes the bottles a nd positions himself/herself at the tap

5 ERG will collect field blank samples at the effluent fr om the FGD wastewater treatment system during only one day of the sampling episode.3-14 with the bottle under the shrouding and opens the inner bag. “Dirty hands” opens the sample tap and adjusts the flow. “Cl ean hands” opens the lid of the total mercury sample bottle and places the bottle under the flowing stream to fill the

bottle. “Clean hands” then closes the lid on the bottle and cl oses the inner bag. “Dirty hands” closes the sample tap. “Cl ean hands” places the bottle in the outer bag and “dirty hands” closes the outer bag. The samplers repeat this procedure to collect the dissolved mercury sample.

Collection from compositor tubi ng discharging to sump/drain : “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the total mercury sample bottle. “Clean hands” positions himself/herself at the end of the sample tubing and holds the total mercury sample bottle under the shrouded tubing and opens the inner bag. “Clean hands” opens the lid of the sample bottle and places th e bottle under the flowing stream to fill

the bottle. “Clean hands” then closes the lid on the bottle, closes the inner bag, and places the bottle in the outer bag. “D irty hands” closes the outer bag. The samplers repeat this procedure to co llect the dissolved mercury sample.

The samplers will fill the bottle directly from the sample tap (or tubing); therefore, the total and dissolved mercur y samples will not be collected as split samples with Miami Fort (or its representa tive), but will be collected as duplicate samples. The total mercury duplicate sample for Miami Fort (or its representative) will be collected immediately after ERG collects the total mercury sample. ERG will not collect the dissolved mercury sample until after Miami Fort (or its representative) collects its total merc ury duplicate sample. Miami Fort (or its representative) will collect its dissolv ed mercury duplicate samples immediately after ERG collects its dissolved mercury sample.

17. The samplers will collect total and disso lved mercury grab samples every six hours during the compositing time period.

18. Samplers will collect a total cyanide grab sample out of the third sample tap, if available. If the third sample tap is not available, samplers will collect a total cyanide grab sample out of the tubing that is discharging into the sump/drain at the sample location. The samplers will fill the bottle directly from the tubing used for the classicals composite container; therefore, the cyanide sample will not be collected as a split sample with Miami Fort (or its re presentative). Immediately after collection, the samplers need to test for sulfides and oxidants and preserve the sample according to the preservation protocols outlined in Section 3.4.

19. The samplers will collect field measur ement samples every six hours during the compositing time period. The field measurement samples will be collected from the tubing that is discharging into th e sump/drain at the sample location.

20. At the end of the composite sampling period, “dirty hands” stops each of the automatic compositors and opens the outer bag of each composite container. For each container, “clean hands” opens the inner bag and detaches the used tubing from the composite container and covers the port with a closed lid or small plastic3-15 bag. The samplers transport each of the composite containers, including the field blank composite container, to the pump-o ff area to pump off the samples into the specified containers.

21. The samplers then repeat steps 1 through 20 to collect the composite samples for the next day of sample collection.

After collecting the composite samples, the sampling team then needs to transfer the sample into the individual sample containers at the pump-off area. For this sampling point, ERG will use a sample pump-off approach to transfer the composite samples to the individual sample bottles, because the samples are expected to have a low solids content. For this sample pump-off procedure, the dissolved metals samples will be collected before the total metals and classical samples to prevent cross-contamination with in the tubing, which could lead to greater

concentrations in the dissolved metals fractions.

Sample Pump-Off Procedures

22. Samplers remove the bags containing th e gloves and HDPE plastic wrap from the coolers or storage containers in which th ey are packed. Samplers identify which coolers or boxes contain the double-bagge d sample bottles, precleaned tubing, and

cleanbox.

23. Both samplers put on Tyvek® suits and gloves. “Dirty hands” covers work surfaces with HDPE plastic wrap and pl aces the double-bagged sample bottles and precleaned tubing within easy access on the covered surface.

24. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the cleanbox and “clean hands” opens the clear inner bag. “Clean hands” places the cleanbox at the point of sample collection. “Clean hands” opens the clea nbox and secures it ope n with the clips

located inside the box.

25. “Dirty hands” opens the peristaltic pump head so the tubing can be placed in the pump head. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag containing a length of precleaned Teflon® tubing connected to a length of precleaned silicone t ubing, a “Y” splitter, and two additional pieces of silicone tubi ng. “Clean hands” moves the tubing into the cleanbox and opens the inner bag and removes the tubing. “Clean hands” places a clean plastic bag over the end of the Teflon® and silicone tubing.

26. “Dirty hands” threads the silicone tu bing into the peristaltic pump head.

27. Both samplers change gloves.

28. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the field blank composite container and total metals field blank sample bottle. “Clean hands” removes the total metals field blank sample bottle and places it in the cleanbox. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag of the field blank composite containe r. “Clean hands” removes the lid from3-16 the field blank composite container and places the end of the Teflon® tubing in

the blank water. “Clean hands” holds the end of the silicone tubing outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with the plastic bag still cove ring the end of the tubing and “dirty hands” operates the pump to pump about 750 mL of blank water from the field blank composite container. “Clean hands” places the end of the silicone tubing in the cleanbox, opens the inner bag of the total metals field blank sample bottle, and removes the lid. “Dirty hands ” operates the pump to collect the total metals field blank sample and then stops the pump. “Clean hands” closes the lid on the sample bottle and closes the inne r bag. “Clean hands” places the inner bag and bottle in the outer bag and “dirty ha nds” closes the outer bag. The samplers repeat this procedure for the total mercury field blank samples.

29. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of a capsule filter. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and removes the capsule filter. “C lean hands” attaches the capsule filter to the silicone tubing just before the “Y” splitter.

30. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of th e dissolved metals field blank sample

bottle. “Clean hands” removes the dissolved metals field blank sample bottle and places it in the cleanbox. “Clean hands” holds the end of the silicone tubing outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with th e plastic bag still covering the end of the tubing and “dirty hands” operates th e pump to pump about 750 mL of blank water from the field blank composite cont ainer. “Clean hands” places the end of the silicone tubing in the cleanbox, opens the inner bag of the dissolved metals field blank sample bottle, and removes the lid. “Dirty hands” operates the pump to

collect the dissolved metals field blank sample and then stops the pump. “Clean hands” closes the lid on the sample bottle and closes the inner bag. “Clean hands” places the inner bag and bottle in the outer bag and “dirty hands” closes the outer bag. The samplers repeat this procedure for the hexavalent chromium field blank samples 6 . “Clean hands” closes the inner bag of the field blank composite container and “dirty hands” closes th e outer bag. Note: 750 mL of blank water does not need to be purged for each sample, just at the beginning of each new filter. If a new filter is needed, “clean hands” removes the used filter and samplers follow step 29 to replace the filter.

31. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the large composite container for the metals samples and “clean hands” opens the i nner bag. “Clean hands” transfers the Teflon® tubing from the field blank com posite container to the metals sample composite container. “Clean hands” holds the end of the silicone tubing outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with the plas tic bag still coveri ng the end of the tubing and “dirty hands” operates the pump to pump about one liter of sample through the tubing and filter and then stops the pump.

6 ERG will collect field blank samples at the effluent fr om the FGD wastewater treatment system during only one day of the sampling episode. ERG will collect the dissolve d mercury sample using the same technique as the total mercury sample, but the dissolved sample will be filtered at the laboratory. A dissolved mercury field blank will be performed by the laboratory to assess any mercury contam ination from the filtering performed at the laboratory. Therefore, ERG does not need to collect a dissolv ed mercury field blank sample in the field.3-17 32. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the dissolved metals sample bottle. “Clean hands” removes the inner bag and bottle and places it in the cleanbox. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and removes the lid. “Dirty hands ” operates the pump to collect the dissolved metals sample and then stops the pump. “Clean hands” closes the lid on the sample bottle and cl oses the inner bag. “Clean hands” places the inner bag and bottle in the outer bag and “dirty ha nds” closes the outer bag. The samplers repeat this procedure fo r the dissolved metals and hexavalent chromium samples. During one day of th e sampling episode, the samplers will collect additional sample volume for th e duplicate samples. The samplers will also collect additional sample volume for the laboratory QC analyses during one day of the sampling episode.

33. “Clean hands” removes the capsule filter from the sample tubing configuration and reconnects the two pieces of tubing.

34. “Clean hands” holds the silicone tubi ng outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with the plastic bag covering the end of th e tubing. “Dirty hands” pumps about one liter of sample through the tubing and th en stops the pump. “Clean hands” places

the end of the silicone tu bing back in the cleanbox.

35. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag of the total metals sample bottle. “Clean hands” removes the inner bag and bottle and pl aces it in the cleanbox. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and removes the lid. “Dirty hands” operates the pump to collect the total metals sample and then stops the pump. “Clean hands” closes the lid on the sample bottle and cl oses the inner bag. “Clean hands” places the inner bag and bottle in the outer bag and “dirty hands” closes the outer bag. During one day of the sampling episode, the samplers will collect additional sample volume for the duplicate samples and during anot her day of the sampling episode, the samplers will collect additional sample volume for the laboratory QC analyses.

36. “Dirty hands” places an ERG label on the outer bags of the sample bottles.

37. “Dirty hands” shakes the large composite containers for the classical analytes to mix the sample. “Dirty hands” opens the outer bag for the composite container. “Clean hands” opens the inner bag and transfers the Teflon® tubing from the metals composite container to the compos ite container for the classical analytes.

38. “Clean hands” holds the silicone tubi ng outside the cleanbox over a bucket, with the plastic bag covering the end of th e tubing. “Dirty hands” pumps about one liter of sample through the t ubing and then stops the pump.

39. Both samplers collect the BOD 5 , Group I, and Group II samples. During one day of the sampling episode, the samplers will collect additional sample volume for the duplicate samples. The samplers will also collect additional sample volume for the laboratory QC analyses during one day of the sampling episode.3-18 EPA plans to collect samples at the effluent from the FGD wastewater treatment system (SP-2) on four consecutive days. The sample collection setup and sampling technique for each day of sampling will be the same.

3.4 Sample Preservation, Shipping, and Analysis

All samples will be maintained on ice immediately upon collection (except metals samples that do not require cooling). Because the classical and hexavalent chromium samples are required to be cooled, all composite containers will be maintained on ice. After pumping off the composite samples into the individual sample c ontainers, the classical an d hexavalent chromium samples will be put in an ice-water bath; how ever, the other metals samples, which do not require cooling, will not be placed on ice. The classical and hexavalent chromium grab samples collected at the FGD influent sampling point will also be placed on ice immediately after

collection.

The dissolved metals (excluding mercury) and hexavalent chromium samples will be filtered in the field. The dissolved mercury samples will be filtered upon receipt at the laboratory. All metals samples, except hexavalent chromium, will be acid-preserved prior to extraction at the laboratory. Hexavalent chromi um samples will be preserved on site, according to the method-specified protocols. Samplers w ill filter samples within 15 minutes after the compositing period ends (or as soon thereafter as possible). The dissolved samples of the FGD influent will be filtered approximately one hour after they are collected to allow for solids settling because the samples’ high solids content would clog the filter.

The total cyanide grab samples will be preserved according to the method-specific protocols immediately following collection. Prior to sample collection, the samplers will test the wastewater at each sampling point fo r sulfide using lead acetate test strips. If sulfide is present, the samplers will use the proce dure identified in Section 3.5 to determine the minimal amount of dilution necessary to reduce sulfide to a nondete ctable concentration. Af ter determining this minimal dilution factor for the sampling point, the samplers will dilute all samples collected at this sampling point using blank water. After dilution, the sample rs will retest the sample for sulfides. If sulfides are still detected, the sample will be diluted further using the same technique

as identified in Section 3.5 to ensure that the sa mple is not over-diluted. The samplers will then test the diluted sample for the presence of oxida nts (i.e., chlorine) using potassium-iodide starch paper. If total chlorine is present, the samplers will add sodium arsenite in small increments until

the oxidants are at nondetectable concentrations in the sample. The samplers will then carefully adjust the pH to >10 S.U. using sodium hydroxide and place the sample on ice. The preservation, including the amount of dilution, will be reported to the labor atory on the traffic reports.

Table 3-3 lists the parameters, bottle type s, sample volume, and on-site preservation requirements for each type of analysis. The t ype and amount of pres ervation used will be recorded on sample preservation log sheets (Fig ure 3-1).With the exception of total cyanide samples, if 10 percent of the sample volume is added and the required pH is not achieved, ERG will stop diluting the samples by discontinuing pres ervation and noting it on the traffic report. The wastewater samples, except metals samples th at do not require cooling, will be packed in ice chests with a sufficient quantity of ice to maintain a temperature of ≤ 6  C. All samples will be prepared for overnight shipment vi a Federal Express to laboratories.3-19 3.5 Field Measurements and Engineering Data Collection

Temperature, pH, sulfide, and oxidants w ill be measured and recorded by the sampling crew at each sampling point (SP-1 and SP-2). The samplers will measure temperature and pH when the automatic composite samplers are initially set up and every six hours during the compositing period. The samplers will test the wast ewater for sulfide and oxidants at the time the total cyanide grab sample is collected. For temperature and pH, the samplers will fill a 1-liter glass jar with sample and test the wastewater i mmediately after co llecting the ali quot. For sulfide and oxidants, the samplers will fill the cyanide sa mple bottle directly and test for sulfide and oxidants using test strips immedi ately after sample collection.

During a presampling set-up day (i.e., the da y before the sampling episode begins), the samplers will test the wastewater at each sampli ng point for sulfide using le ad acetate test strips to determine if preservation is needed for cyanid e. If sulfide is present, the samplers will

determine the minimal amount of dilution necessar y to reduce the sulfide concentration to below detection by the lead ace tate test strips. To identify the mi nimal amount of dilution, the samplers will dilute the sample by a factor of two (1:1) and re test for sulfide. If sulfide is still detected, the samplers will dilute the original sample by a fact or of 3 (2:1). They will continue this process until sulfide is not detected in the sample. After th is minimal dilution factor is determined for the sampling point, the samplers will use this minimal dilution factor to dilute all samples collected at the sampling point. The samplers will also test both the original (i.e., nondiluted) and diluted sample for the presence of oxidants (e.g., chlo rine) during the presam pling set-up day using potassium-iodide starch paper.

1. Samplers will follow applicable test kit calibration procedures specified by

the manufacturer. Table 3-4 summarizes th e field measurements, the method to be used for the measurement, and the detection range of each field test instrument. In addition, EPA will collect flow rate data for each sampled waste stream. The flow

rate of the treated wastewater at the effl uent sampling point will be collected from the plant’s existing flow recorders. Miam i Fort does not have a flow meter that

measures the flow rate of the sec ondary hydrocyclone overflow entering the equalization tank; therefore, the flow ra te during the sample collection will be calculated using other data available from the plant. [QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: How can the secondary hydrocyclone overflow flow rate be calculated?

ERG would like to collect the informati on as a daily average, as well as the average during the actual time of the sample collection.] Pg 32 secondary HC flow

rate

– we will have to estimate the flow based on the instantaneous design flow rate (I

think it is 120 gpm for each cluster I’ll look it up) and then use the time duration from PI. (From Joe Potts)

Field sampling log sheets (Figure 3-2) will be completed at each sampling point. This sheet will record the sampling methodology, names of the samplers, sample collection time, field measurements, and any notes and observations.3-20 Samplers will also collect engineering inform ation with regard to design and operation of the plant. For example, they will collect info rmation such as coal usage, plant capacity, wastewater flow rates, sludge ge neration rates (if applic able), and retention times in wastewater treatment process stages. Engineering data collec tion sheets (Figures 3-3, 3-4, and 3-5) will be completed for the plant. This information will be used to determine if the specific design or operational criteria of the steam electric operations affect th e wastewater characteristics.

3.6 Sample Labeling

Each sample will be coded with a unique sample number and labeled at the time of collection. Typically, labels are pr inted prior to arrival in the fi eld, although they may also be completed by hand. Each self-adhesive label will be completed in indelible ink and contain the following information:

Sample number; Sampling episode number; Sampling point/description; Date of sample collection; Analysis to be performed; Sample bottle type; and Required preservation.

If any of the preprinted information is incorr ect, it will be revised using indelible ink. In particular, if a required preservation is not used, it will be marked out (additional preservation

details will be noted on the tra ffic report). Once applied to the sample container, labels are covered with clear tape to pr event tampering, abrasion, smearing, or loss during transit. For metal samples, the samplers will not label the sa mple bottles, but will label the outer plastic bag of the sample bottle.

3.7 Traffic Reports

To maintain a record of sample collection, transfer between personnel, shipment, and receipt by the laboratory, samplers will complete a traffic report for each sample set at each sampling location. These forms are used to documen t sample custody transfer from the field to the laboratory. Traffic report forms will be completed for all samples sent to all laboratories. Figure 3-6 includes an example of a traffic report. At the time of sample shipment, a copy of the traffic report will be sent to ERG, another copy will be kept by sampling personnel, and two copies will be transmitted with the samples to the analytical laboratory.

In addition to the transfer of custody, th e traffic report provides information to the analytical laboratory on the sample number, type of water sample (in- line process, untreated wastewater, treated effluent), sa mple description, whether the sa mple is preserved, pH of the sample after preservation, type of sample (grab, composite), sample collection date and time, and the analyses requested. Samplers will use the comment section to provi de special notes or instructions to the laboratory, such as whether samples have been filtered on site or how to composite separate samples prior to analysis. The sampling team will also comment if sample bottles are not completely filled (i.e., less than 75 percent full). In addition, the comments section3-21 will be used to note deviations from standard sa mpling protocols (for example, if a sample could not be acid-preserved because of excessive buffering).

3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control

The QA/QC program for sample collection at Miami Fort will include the following:

Documentation for samples thr ough laboratory traffic reports;

Collection of duplicate samples for all analytes;

Collection of bottle blank(s) for metals;

Collection of field blank(s) for metals;

Collection of equipment blank(s) for metals; and

Collection of laboratory QC samples for matr ix spike/matrix spike duplicate analyses.

Duplicate sample sets will be collected as part of the quality assurance program for sampling. During one day of the sampling episode, ERG will collect one duplicate sample (SP-3)

of the effluent from the FGD wa stewater treatment system (SP-2) . The duplicate sample will be collected as a separate aliquot in the field. Results of the duplic ate analyses will be used to evaluate precision, including vari ability in sample collection, ha ndling, preparation, and analysis.

Bottle blanks will be used to evaluate po ssible contamination from the sample bottles. The bottle blank will consist of an analyte- free matrix (Ultra Pure Blank Water DI+ TM ) poured into the appropriate sample bot tles (e.g., 250-mL plastic bottle for metals) and stored for several days prior to shipment to the laboratory. The supplier of the cleaned metals bottles will prepare and analyze the bottle blanks prior to shipping the equipm ent to the sampling episode.

Field blanks will be used to evaluate possible contamination caused by sampling equipment or by sampling equipment decontaminati on procedures. Field bla nks will be prepared in the field prior to sample collection and analy zed for all sampling equipment, other than sample bottles, that come into direct contact with samples (e.g., tubing or filters).

ERG will prepare field blanks for each of the total and dissolved metals analyses at each of the two sampling points during one day of the sampling episode 7 . ERG samplers will use “clean hands / dirty hands” sampling techniques to prepare the metals field blanks, as discussed

in more detail in Section 3.3. The total metals fiel d blanks (including mercur y) at the influent to the FGD wastewater treatment system will be prepared by gravity-feeding ASTM Type 1 water through the silicone tubing into the sample bottle s. The total metals field blanks (excluding mercury) at the effluent from the FGD wastew ater treatment system sampling point will be prepared by pumping ASTM Type 1 water thr ough the composite tubing set into a large

7 ERG is not planning to collect the field blanks for all sampling points on the same day during the sampling episode. Additionally, ERG will not collect a field blank for dissolved mercury because a filter blank will be prepared and analyzed by the laboratory.3-22 composite container where it will be held fo r the 24-hour compositing period, then pumping the ASTM Type 1 water from the large composite c ontainer through the Teflon® and silicone tubing and into the sample bottles. The total mercur y field blank at the e ffluent from the FGD

wastewater treatment system sa mpling point will be prepared by either gravity-feeding ASTM Type 1 water directly into the sample bottles , or pumping ASTM Type 1 water through the tubing that discharges to the sump/drain and into the sample bottles. The dissolved metals field

blank at the influent to the F GD wastewater treatment system sa mpling points will be prepared by gravity-feeding ASTM Type 1 water through th e silicone tubing set in to a large composite container where it will be held for approxi mately one hour, then pumping the ASTM Type 1 water from the large composite container through the Teflon ® and silicone tubing, through a

0.45- μ m filter, and into the sample bottles. The dissolved metals field blanks at the effluent from the FGD wastewater treatment sy stem sampling point will be pr epared by pumping ASTM Type 1 water through the composite tubing set into a large composite container where it will be held for the 24-hour compositing period, then pumpi ng the ASTM Type 1 water from the large composite container through the Teflon® and silicone tubing, through a 0.45- μ m filter, and into the sample bottles. The field blanks will determine if there is any contamination from the sampling equipment, atmospheric contamination, or other contamination from the surroundings.

EPA Method 1669 requires that equipment blanks also be prepared and analyzed for metals to evaluate possible contamination of metals caused by the sampling equipment. The supplier of the tubing and composite containers will prepare and analyze these equipment blanks and provide a report certifyi ng the equipment as clean.

As part of standard laborator y quality control, matrix eff ects on analytical performance are assessed through the analysis of matrix spikes and laboratory duplicates. Consequently, additional sample volume must be collected for these QC analyses. The sampling team will collect, label, and ship the necessary laborat ory QC volumes. Laboratory QC volumes (i.e., MS/MSD sample) will be collected for every 10 samples collected at a sampling event, excluding field blank samples. For classical anal yses, EPA will collect one QC sample volume at

the effluent from the FGD wastewater treatment system (SP-2) sample point at each episode. For all analytes requiring laboratory QC volumes, th e sampling team will collect QC sample volume

from the effluent from the F GD wastewater treatment system (SP-2) during one day of the sampling episode.

3.9 Sample Splitting

Miami Fort or its representative has elected to collect split samples at each of the sampling points. Miami Fort or its representati ve will supply all of th e personnel, equipment, glassware, and reagents required to collect the split samples and to coordinate the analysis of samples. For each of the sampling points, the samp ling crew will attempt to collect split samples with Miami Fort or its represen tative as described in this plan; however, if problems occur (e.g., the splitters become clogged and the flow is sp lit unevenly between the sampling crews), then EPA may stop the split sample collection and o ffer instead to collect duplicate samples with Miami Fort or its representative.3-23Table 3-1. Sample Collection at Miami Fort StationSamplingPointNumberSampling Point Name Total Metals (EPA Method 200.8 with collision cell) Total Metals (EPA Method 200.7) Dissolved Metals (EPA Method 200.8 with collision cell) Dissolved Metals (EPA Method 200.7) Total Mercury Dissolved Mercury Hexavalent Chromium BOD 5 Group I

a Group II b Total CyanideSP-1 Influent to the FGD WastewaterTreatment System4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4SP-2 Effluent from the FGD WastewaterTreatment System4+1QC 4+1QC 4+1QC 4+1QC 4+1QC4+1QC 4+1QC 4+1QC 4+1QC 4+1QC4+1QCSP-3 Duplicate of Effluent from the FGDWastewater Treatment System1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11SP-4 Influent to the FGD WastewaterTreatment System Field Blank1 1 1 1 4 1SP-5 Effluent from the FGD WastewaterTreatment System Field Blank1 1 1 1 4 1Total Number of Samples 11+1QC 11+1QC 11+1QC 11+1QC 17+1QC 9+1QC 11+1QC 9+1QC 9+1QC 9+1QC 9+1QCa – Group I includes total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), sulfate, and chloride.b – Group II includes ammonia as nitrogen, nitrate/nitrite as nitrogen, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total phosphorus.3-24 Table 3-2. Analytical Methods

Parameter Method Number

Classicals Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 ) SM 5210 B Chemical oxygen demand (COD) EPA 410.4 Total suspended solids (TSS) SM 2540 D Total dissolved solids (TDS) SM 2540 C

Sulfate EPA 300.0

Chloride EPA 300.0 Ammonia as nitrogen EPA 350.1

Nitrate/nitrate as nitrogen EPA 353.2 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) EPA 351.2 Total phosphorus EPA 365.1 Total cyanide SM 4500 CN E

Total and Dissolved Metals Mercury EPA 1631E Hexavalent chromium (dissolved only) EPA 218.6 Antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc EPA 200.8 with collision cell

Aluminum, barium, beryllium, boron, calcium, cobalt, iron, magnesium, molybdenum, sodium, tin, and titanium EPA 200.73-25 Table 3-3. Summary of Sample Co ntainer and Planned Preservation

Parameter Sample

Container and

Volume QC Sample

Container and

Volume On-Site Preservation

Classicals

BOD 5 One 1-L plastic

bottle One 1-L plastic

bottle ≤ 6  C

Group I a One 1-L plastic

bottles One 1-L plastic

bottles ≤ 6  C

Group II b Two 1-L plastic

bottles Two 1-L plastic

bottles H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, ≤ 6  C

Total cyanide One 1-L plastic

bottle One 1-L plastic

bottles NaOH to pH >10, dilution until sulfide is not present, NaAsO 2 until total chlorine is not present,

≤ 6  C

Metals

Total metals (EPA Method 200.8 with collision cell) One 500-mL plastic bottle No additional

volume needed None (acid preserve at laboratory)

Total metals (EPA Method 200.7) One 500-mL plastic bottle No additional

volume needed None (acid preserve at laboratory)

Dissolved metals (EPA Method 200.8 with collision cell) One 500-mL plastic bottle No additional

volume needed 0.45-μm filter (performed in field) (acid preserve at laboratory)

Dissolved metals (EPA Method 200.7) One 500-mL plastic bottle No additional

volume needed 0.45-μm filter (performed in field) (acid preserve at laboratory)

Total mercury: None (acid preserve at laboratory) Manual composite grab samples Four 125-mL glass bottle No additional

volume needed

Influent samples and field blank samples Two 250-mL glass bottle No additional

volume needed

Dissolved mercury: None (filter and acid preserve at laboratory) Manual composite grab samples Four 125-mL glass bottle No additional

volume needed

Influent samples One 250-mL glass bottle No additional

volume needed

Hexavalent chromium One 250-mL plastic bottle No additional

volume needed 0.45-μm filter (performed in field) Ammonium sulfate buffer to pH
9.3 – 9.7, ≤ 6  C

a – Group I includes TSS, TD S, sulfate, and chloride. b – Group II includes ammonia as nitrogen, COD, nitr ate/nitrite as nitrogen, TKN, and total phosphorus.3-26 Table 3-4. Sampling Point Field Measurements

Field Measurements Method Detection Range (or Gradation of Scale)

Temperature Thermometer -20 to 150 ± 1oC

pH (Standard Units) Four-color indicator strip pH meter 0 to 12 ± 1 pH S.U. -1.0 to 15.0 ± 0.1 pH S.U.

Sulfide Lead acetate test strip >50 mg/L sulfide (S 2- )

Oxidants (i.e., chlorine) Potassium-iodide starch paper >1 mg/L free chlorine (Cl 2 )3-27 Sampling Episode ____________

Preservation Chemicals – List Strength of Solution from Bottle and Lot Number

H 2 SO 4 _____________________ NH 4 SO 4 ________________________

NaOH _____________________

Sample

Number Analysis Date Time Name Chemical Initial pH Final pH Number of Drops

Figure 3-1. Sample Preservation Log Sheet3-28 Sampling Episode: __________________________________

Sampling Point: ____________________________________

Sample Numbers: __________________________________

Date:

Manual Composite 

## □ Grab 

## □

Automatic Composite 

## □

Time of Grab Sample Collection:

Start Time 

## □ AM 

## □ PM

End Time 

## □ AM 

## □ PM

Time of Automatic Sample Collection:

Start Time 

## □ AM 

## □ PM

End Time 

## □ AM 

## □ PM

Equipment Used: _________________________________________________

Samplers’ Names: ________________________________________________

Grab Sample Time Temp

°C pH (S.U.) meter / strips Waste Stream Flow Rate (MGD)

1

2

3

4

Notes: (include observations of odor and color of each aliquot, take pi ctures if necessary)

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________ Figure 3-2. Field Sampling Log Sheet3-293-29Plant Name: ________________________________________________________________________________Plant Contact: ______________________________________________________________________________Dates of Sample Collection: ___________________________________________________________________Data Collectedby: ___________________________________________________________________________Instructions: In the tables below, fill out information on the generating units and FGD systems operating at the plant based onall four days of the samplingepisode. Note any changes in operation that occur during the four-day period. Provide actual data if possible. If actual data are not available, provide estimatesfor the specific information. Some of the data requested may not be susceptible to estimation. Enter “URE” for “unable to reasonably estimate.” Otherwise,specify whether data provided are actual or estimated by writing in “ACT” or EST” wherever appropriate.Generating Unit Operating Characteristics During Sample CollectionUnitIDBoiler TypeCapacity(MW)ElectricityProduction(MW)(or PercentCapacity %)aSCR(No, On,Off)ParticulateControl System(HS/CS ESP, orBH)aThe electricity production should be measured on a daily basis from midnight of the 1stday of sample collection tomidnight of the last day of sample collection.FGD System Operating Characteristics During Sample CollectionUnitIDWet FGDSystem(Yes/No)Type ofScrubberForcedOxidation(Yes/No)SorbentAdditives(DBA, formicacid, etc.)FGD Makeup WaterSourceSO2RemovalPercentageType ofSolidsSeparationNote changes in operation over the past month (e.g., turned off SCRs on October 1 or burned 5percent petroleum coke previous week);Figure 3-3. Engineering Data Collection Sheet (Page 1 of 3)3-30 Plant Name: ________________________________________________________________________________ Plant Contact: ______________________________________________________________________________ Dates of Sample Collection: ___________________________________________________________________

Data Collected by: ___________________________________________________________________________

Instructions: In the tables below, provide information on the coal burned and FGD scrubber slurry at the plant for each day of the sampling episode. Provide actual data if po ssible. If actual data are not available, provide estimates for the specific information. Some of the data requested may not be susceptible to estimation. Enter “URE” for “unable to reasonably estimate.” Otherwise, specify whether data provided are actual or estimated by writing in “ACT” or EST” wherever appropriate.

Coal Information

Day of Sampling Unit ID Coal Type Amount of

Coal Used

During Day of Sampling Source of Coal (Coal

Region

and/or State) Percent

Sulfur in

Coal Chlorine

Content of

Coal

1

2

3

4

Note changes in operation over the past month (e.g., turned off SCRs on October 1 or burned 5% petroleum coke previous week) as well as conditions and changes during the sampling episode:

Scrubber Slurry Information

Day of Sampling FGD System ID Associated

Unit IDs Scrubber Slurry

Blowdown Flow Rate Scrubber Slurry

Percent

Solids Time of Dewatering

During Sampling Day Percent

Filtrate Recycled

Back to

Scrubber Flow Rate

(gpm) Duration

1

2

3

4

Figure 3-4. Engineering Data Co llection Sheet (Page 2 of 3)3-31Plant Name: ________________________________________________________________________________Plant Contact: ______________________________________________________________________________Dates of SampleCollection: ___________________________________________________________________Data Collectedby: ___________________________________________________________________________Instructions: In the table below, provideinformation on the FGD wastewater treatment system for each day of the sampling episode and the volumes of the FGDwastewater treatment system tanks and reactors. If possible, provide the name of the acid and polymer used during the samplingepisode. Provide actual data ifpossible. If actual data are not available, provide estimates for the specific information. Some of the data requested may notbe susceptible to estimation. Enter“URE” for “unable to reasonably estimate.”Otherwise, specify whether data providedare actual or estimated by writing in “ACT”or EST” whereverappropriate.FGD Wastewater Treatment System Operation InformationDay ofSamplingScrubber PurgeChemical Usage(specify units)Flow Rate(gpm)DurationLimeFerricChlorideOrgano-sulfide_________(specify product)Polymer:_________(specify product)Acid:_________(specify product)1234Volume of equalization tank: ________________Volume of coagulation tank: 1) ________________ 2) ________________ 3) ________________Volume of clarifiers (including rector portion): 1) ________________ 2) ________________Figure 3-5. Engineering Data Collection Sheet (Page 3 of 3)3-32 Figure 3-6. Example Traffic Report EPISODE NO:

RANGE OF SAMPLE NOS:

Return completed form to:

FOR LAB USE ONLY

NAME: SHIP TO: DATE REC'D:

CITY: ATTN: REC'D BY:

STATE: CARRIER: SAMPLE CONDITION ON RECEIPT:

INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY: AIRBILL:

DATE SHIPPED:

CONFIDENTIAL (Y/N): SAMPLING OFFICE/SAMPLER:

SAMPLE

NUMBERSOURCE WATER(city, river, well)IN LINE PROCESSUNREATED EFFLUENT(raw wastewater)TREATED EFFLUENTOTHER(specify) ADDITIONAL

SAMPLE

DESCRIPTIONPH LEVELPRESERVED (Y/N)G=GRAB / C=COMPOSITESAMPLE COLLECTIONTIME / DATE

Comments: United States


# EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460

TRAFFIC REPORT P.O. BOX 1407

USEPA ENGINEERING AND ANALYSIS DIVISION ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313

SAMPLE CONTROL CENTER (703) 519-1140

INDUSTRIAL FIRM SAMPLED SHIPPING & INFORMATION

SAMPLE POINT DESCRIPTION SAMPLE ANALYSES Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 201514-1 4. S AMPLING A CTIVITIES

This section discusses the sampling t eam organization, sampling preparation, and sampling activities.

4.1 Sampling Team Organization

The sampling crew will consist of a crew chief and four crew members from ERG and two EPA representatives. The crew chief will be responsible for all health and safety, sample collection, preservation, and shipping activitie s while at Miami Fort. Following the sampling episode, ERG will collate the analytical results from each laboratory and summarize and transmit this information in a trip report to EPA. After EPA review, the report will be forwarded to Miami

Fort for review.

4.2 Presampling Preparation

On March 1, 2010, ERG and EPA conducted a site visit at Miami Fort . The site visit and subsequent follow-up telephone calls to Miami Fo rt representatives provided ERG and EPA the necessary information to prepare for the sampli ng episode and to create this sampling plan.

As part of preparing the team for the sa mpling episode at Miami Fort, the ERG crew chief will distribute this sampling plan to each team member and ensure they are completely familiar with the sampling plan and the health and safety requirements specific to Miami Fort. The crew chief will also give copies of this sampling plan to Miami Fort personnel before sampling begins.

The ERG crew chief will also coordinate th e procurement and shipment of all necessary sampling and health and safety equipment.

4.3 Field Sampling Activities

Upon arrival at Miami Fort, the ERG cr ew chief, in conjunction with the EPA representatives, will meet with Miami Fort personnel to determine whether samples can be collected as planned at each of the planned sampling points. Upon confirming the methods to collect samples, the ERG crew chief will update the descrip tions of the proposed sampling points, if necessary, in consulta tion with EPA and Miami Fort pe rsonnel. If necessary, the crew chief will obtain additional equipment. The revised sampling description will include:

A sampling point description and collec tion procedure for each sampling point; A list of the sample fractions to be collected at each point; A list of potential physical h azards (e.g., pH, temperature, and potentially hazardous equipment); A list of potential chemical hazards asso ciated with each sampling point; and A list of proposed health and safety procedures.

Prior to sampling, the ERG crew chief will notify the ERG Health and Safety Coordinator (HSC) of any revi sed sampling activity descript ions along with recommended revisions to the proposed health and safety pr ocedures. Together, the crew chief and HSC will4-2review the proposed health and safety procedures. The crew chief will incorporate any plantspecific changes indicated by the HSC and receive approval for sampling from the HSC before proceeding with sampling activities.

All sample bottles will be labeled, co llected, and preserved, according to method protocols. Sample fractions requiring ≤ 6 o C preservation will be placed on ice. Sample fractions will then be sealed, and placed in coolers for shipment to the laboratory. The Traffic Report forms will be completed and placed in plastic sleeve s inside the coolers. The coolers will then be taken to the nearest Federal Expr ess office and shipped to the an alytical laboratories. At the conclusion of the sampling episode, the sampling equipment will be prepared for return shipping.

4.4 Logistics

This subsection summarizes Miami Fort co ntacts, analytical la boratory contacts and addresses, and sampling team personnel and support functions.

4.4.1 Miami Fort Station Contacts

Jim Stieritz Duke Energy Ohio

11021 Brower Road North Bend, OH 45052 (513) 287-2269

JR Wood Duke Energy Ohio

11021 Brower Road North Bend, OH 45052 (513) 467-4886

[QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: Who will be th e plant contact for the sampling episode, including the point of contact for shipping supplies to the plant?] Tara Thomas and JR Wood (Tara on vacation Thursday and Friday 7/15 & 7/16)

4.4.2 EPA Contacts

Ron Jordan Engineering and Analysis Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (4303T) Washington, D.C. 20460 (202) 566-10034-3 Jezebele Alicea Engineering and Analysis Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (4303T) Washington, D.C. 20460 (202) 566-1755

4.4.3 Analytical Laboratories

TBD

4.4.4 ERG Contacts

TJ Finseth (Crew Chief) Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1698

Deborah Bartram (Work Assignment Manager) Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1669

4.4.5 Freight Forwarders

Federal Express (FedEx) General Information (800) 463-3339

FedEx Express Ship Center (7 miles from plant)

2800 Earhart Court Hebron, KY 41048 Hours of Operation: Mon. – Fr i.: 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.

Last Express Drop-off: Mon. – Fri.: 9:00 p.m.

FedEx Office Print and Ship Ce nter (8 miles from plant) 5044 Glencrossing Way Cincinnati, OH 45238 Hours of Operation: Mon. – Fr i.: 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.

Last Express Drop-off: Mon. – Fri.: 7:00 p.m.5-1 5. S AMPLE S HIPMENT

All sample containers will be labeled with ERG's standard address labels. All samples will be tracked using Traffic Report forms. Cust ody will be maintained by the sampling crew chief from sample collection until samples are delivered to Federal Express.

All samples will be packaged and shi pped in accordance with Department of Transportation (DOT) or International Air Tr ansport Association (IA TA) regulations. The general IATA packaging requirements for air shipment are as follows:

“Inner packaging must be packed, secured or cushioned as to prevent their breakage or leakage and so as to control their move ment within the outer packaging during normal conditions of transport. Cushioni ng material must not react dangerously

with the contents of the inner packaging. Any leakage of the contents must not substantially impair the protective properties of the cushioning material. Unless otherwise provided in this paragraph or in the Packing Instructions, liquids in Classes, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 8 of Packing Groups I or II in glass or earthenware inner packaging, must be packaged using mate rial capable of ab sorbing the liquid.

Absorbent material must not react da ngerously with th e liquid. Absorbent material is not required...” (IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations, 5.0.16).

“When filling receptacles for liquids, sufficient ullage (outage) must be left to ensure that neither leakage nor permanent distortion of the receptacle will occur as a result of an expansion of the liquid caused by temperatures likely to prevail during transport. Liquids must not completely fill a receptacle at a temperature of 55°C (130°F).” (IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations, 5.0.12).

The packing and labeling procedures in the following subsections may be used for nonhazardous samples. Hazardous samples will be identified based on consultation with the hazardous shipments contact, and appropriate ha zardous shipping procedures will be followed. Based on process considerations, samples collected at Miami Fort will not be classified as IATA dangerous goods.

5.1 Sample Set Preparation

Samples are collected as a se ries of “fractions,” or bottl es designated for particular analyses requiring the same preservation. The comprehensive water sample set consists of sample fractions for all pollutants listed in Sectio n 3.2, collected as grab samples directly into the individual sample containers or composite samp les that are transferred to individual sample containers using a pump-off approach.

5.2 Sample Packing

All dilute samples from the plant will be packed according to the following guidelines (there is no limit on the amount of liqui d each sample container may contain):5-2 1. Label each sample bottle. If a required preservation is not used, cross it off with

indelible ink. Cover the label with clear tape to protect this information. Do not label metal sample bottles, but the outer plastic bag for each bottle instead.

2. Tighten the lid on each filled sample bottle, being careful not to overtighten the lid. If bottle threads are dirty to where th e lid is impeded from closing, clean the threads on the bottle being careful to not introduce contamination into the sample. Clean the sample bottle with a cloth rag or paper towel. Do not clean the bottle threads for the metals sample bottles.

3. Prior to packaging, place each sample bottle requiring ≤ 6°C preservation into an

ice chest with wet ice to cool.

4. Wrap each glass sample bottle with two layers of “bubble wrap” (or place bottle in two “bubble bags”). The bubble wrap mu st fit snugly and completely cover the sample bottle. Enclose each “bubble-wrappe d” container and plastic container in an individual sealable plastic freezer bag.

5. Place two garbage bags inside each other in the cooler.

6. Place sample bottles in garbage bags in the cooler with proper end up, close the interior garbage bag by tying or with a twist-tie. If the samples do not require

≤ 6°C preservation, close the outer ba g by tying or using a twist-tie.

7. For samples requiring ≤ 6°C preservation, add ice to c ooler to keep samples cold during shipment. Arrange blue ice or sealed plastic freezer bags filled with wet ice on top of the sample bottles (if samples require ≤ 6°C preservation). If using wet ice, place the ice inside two one-gallon s ealable freezer bags. Put at least 4 × 1⁄2 gallons of ice (4 × 2.5 pounds of ice) in each large cooler and 2 × 1⁄2 gallons of ice (2 × 2.5 pounds of ice) in each small cooler. Use more ice when ambient temperatures are very high. Place the ice inside the second garbage bag and close the second garbage bag by tying or with a twist-tie.

8. Fill in around the bottles and any free sp ace with additional cushioning material. Use sufficient packing material so that th e sample containers will not shift during shipment.

9. Seal the Traffic Report form in a plastic zip-lock bag and tape it securely to the

inside of the cooler lid.

10. Place a "Return to ..." label on th e inside of the cooler lid.

11. Close cooler.

12. Make several wraps with ta pe around the cooler perpendicular to the seal to

ensure that the lid will remain closed if the latch is accidentally released or damaged.5-3 13. Tape the cooler drain plug so it will not open.

14. Place a completed address label on the lid of the cooler including name, address, and telephone number of the receiving laboratory and the return address and telephone number of the shipper.6-1 6. S ITE -S PECIFIC H EALTH AND S AFETY P ROCEDURES

This section specifies the health and safety procedures and practices to be used by the sampling team during sampling at Miami Fort. This section provides genera l health and safety information for this sampling episode. The sampling team is obligated to follow all safety procedures specified in this section.

6.1 Emergency/Medical Procedures

The following procedures will be followed in the event of a medical or other emergency

situation.

6.1.1 First Aid

Miami Fort has first aid kits available th roughout the plant. In addition, ERG will also bring a first aid kit. After safety orientation at the plant, the sampling team will be equipped with all emergency numbers while on site. Miami Fort does have a first responder team at the plant

and ERG would have access to the t eam in the case of an emergency.

6.1.2 Site Evacuation/Emergency Response Plan

The sampling team will be informed of the Miami Fort evacuation procedures and routes by plant personnel.

6.1.3 Emergency Showers and Eye Washes

Emergency showers and eye wash stations are located throughout the plant. Before collecting samples at any point, sampling team me mbers will locate the nearest operating safety shower and eye wash station.

6.1.4 Local Hospital

The nearest hospital is Dearborn County Ho spital, located in Lawrenceburg, IN, and is approximately 6 miles from Miami Fort Steam Station. The hospital address is:

Dearborn County Hospital

600 Wilson Creek Road Lawrenceburg, IN 47025

The local emergency phone number in North Bend, OH is 911.

[QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: Is this the closest hospital listing for the area?] Yes

6.2 ERG Health and Safety Responsibilities and Authority

The ERG Work Assignment Manager (WAM), crew chief, and sampling team members have different responsibili ties to maintain a safe sampling environment. These responsibilities

are described below.6-2 6.2.1 Work Assignment Manager

The ERG WAM, Deborah Bartram, has the ove rall responsibility to ensure that these health and safety procedures are developed a nd implemented in accordance with regulations and corporate guidelines, that proper health and safety procedures ha ve been initiated, and that all

ERG activities are conducted in accordance with the health and safety plan. The ERG WAM will also ensure that proper resources are allocated so that the project is condu cted in a safe manner, and that the crew chief is competent in his ab ility to oversee health and safety during the sampling episode.

6.2.2 Crew Chief

The ERG crew chief, TJ Finseth, is res ponsible for ensuring that ERG sampling team members adhere to this plan. The ERG crew chie f and ERG night crew ch ief are responsible for overseeing all activities. The crew chiefs must re port any accident, near miss, or injury to any sampling team member to the ERG Chantilly O ffice Health and Safety Coordinator (HSC), Kevin Sikora, verbally within eight hours, or so oner. The HSC will investigate the incident to identify the cause of the accident, near miss, or injury. If sufficient cause exists, ERG’s general health and safety plan and in-house training prog ram will be modified to avoid similar accidents

in the future.

At the start of the sampling visit, the cr ew chiefs will inspect all sampling points and review sample collection procedures with the Mi ami Fort personnel to ensure that all potential

hazards have been identified.

The crew chiefs have the authority to en force ERG’s health and safety requirements contained in this plan, and any pl ant-specific requirements. Changes to this plan can be made if the crew chiefs, the Chantilly HSC, and EPA representative agree that the changes are appropriate.

6.2.3 Sampling Team Members

All field personnel are responsible for follo wing the requirements of this plan, adhering to plant-specific health and safety pro cedures, and donning required/recommended personal protective equipment (PPE). They are also respon sible for bringing health and safety issues to

the attention of the crew chiefs.

6.3 Briefings

ERG sampling team personnel will attend on- and off-site health and safety briefings.

6.3.1 Off-Site Briefings

Prior to arriving on site, all members of th e sampling team will receive a copy of this sampling plan and attend a presampling meeting to review the sampling plan and the proposed sample collection activities. All ERG employees w ill be required to sign a health and safety signoff sheet stating that they have read, understood, a nd agree with this health and safety plan prior to participating in field sampling activities.6-3 6.3.2 On-Site Briefings

ERG sampling team personnel must attend a 45-minute safety c ourse given by Miami Fort personnel prior to conducting sampling activiti es at Miami Fort. This safety course will review plant-specific health and safety procedures, including:

Locating on-site first aid/emergency medical procedures; Required PPE; High hazard areas and other specific areas or hazards of concern; Emergency alarms and evacuation procedures; and Other site safety requirements and pro cedures that ERG personnel must follow.

[QUESTION FOR MIAMI FORT: Please confirm this information is correct.] Yes

6.4 Safety Procedures

ERG personnel will follow general safety procedures, which include wearing PPE and engaging in safe work practices.

6.4.1 PPE

The PPE listed below will be worn by ERG personnel at all times while inside the premises of Miami Fort:

Steel-toed safety shoes; Long sleeves (when sampling) and pants; Hard hat, where required by Miami Fort; Hearing protection, where needed; Nitrile or noncolored, electronic grade gl oves, when collecting or preserving; and Safety glasses with side shields or ch emical splash goggles, when collecting or preserving samples, and when required by Miami Fort.

For all phases of sample collection, disposab le PPE will be used, so decontamination of the PPE may not be necessary. If gloves become to rn or degraded, they will be thrown away and replaced with a new pair. Disposable PPE, includ ing gloves, will be removed, bagged, and left at

the site in a c ontrolled manner.

6.4.2 Safety Practices

ERG personnel will conduct themselves at all times in a manner judged to be safe by site supervisors.

All sample collection will be scheduled so that no ERG employee collects samples alone.

Each worker will maintain visual contact with at least one othe r worker at all times. This buddy system will ensure against an employee becoming injured or contaminated with chemicals without a coworker being aware of his or he r condition. Workers should “watch out” for each other while working close to potential chemi cal and physical hazards. A Miami Fort or EPA6-4 employee may be used as a buddy by ERG personnel. This arrangement will be agreed to and acknowledged by the employee.

ERG employees will not enter any pe rmit-required confined space areas.

6.4.3 Safe Work Practices

ERG samplers will obey the following safety rules while working in the plant:

Wearing PPE, where required; Staying within designated areas; Not wearing loose clothing or jewelry; Keeping long hair in hard hat or tied back; Not eating in the sampling or staging areas; and Not smoking in the sampling or staging areas.

6.5 Sampling-Point-Specific Safety Procedures

All sampling team members will be advi sed of any sampling-point-specific safety protocols during the on-site he alth and safety briefing. Tabl e 6-1 summarizes all potential sampling-point-specific safety hazards as well as the PPE required at each sampling point. During the day shift, the sampling team health and safety officer (HSO) for this sampling episode is the crew chief, TJ Finseth (ERG). During the night shift, the HSO for this sampling episode is the ERG night crew chief (to be de termined at a later da te). The HSO and the sampling team will inspect each sampling point area to identify unique or additional hazards not already covered in this plan or during the formal health and safety briefing. If additional hazards are found, the sampling team will be informed of each hazard and required control measures prior to the start of work. Wh ere identified hazards may affect the plant’s personnel, the HSO will notify the appropriate Miami Fort personnel.

6.5.1 Physical Hazards

ERG personnel will be alert for all physic al hazards present wh ile on site. Physical hazards may arise from using catwalks, hitting low-hanging overhead piping, and working around moving equipment or vehicles. ERG personne l will be aware of the potential splash

hazards at SP-1 and SP-2 due to the location of the sample taps. To prevent splashing, ERG personnel will ensure that the sample tubing is connected securely to the sample tap and will open the sample valve slowly when collecting samples. Other potential hazards may include falling hazards during sample collection, tripping on metal grates, or oper ation of large trucks and machinery in the vicinity of the sample co llection area. See Table 6-1 for potential hazards that may be associated with specific sampling points.

For the FGD wastewater treatment system in fluent (SP-1) sample point, ERG will place “non-skid” mats on the top of the equalizati on tank to minimize the slipping hazard due to potentially wet conditions on the surface of the equalization tank. Samplers will also use caution when moving around on top of the eq ualization tank to make sure not to trip on the structural

beams that run from the center of th e tank to the outer lip of the tank.6-5 Noise may be a hazard in certain areas of the plant. The sampling team will use hearing protection where required by the plant, when th ey are having trouble h earing or being heard when standing three feet or less away from a nother person, or when deemed necessary by the Miami Fort personnel or ERG crew chief.

6.5.2 Thermal Hazards

Heat stress may be a concern during the sa mpling episode. Samplers may be suited in Tyvek® and temperatures could reach extremes. Of particular concern is SP-1, which is located outside. The sampling team members will consume plen ty of fluids prior to the start of sampling,

and will monitor each other for symptoms of heat stress.

Wastewater sampling points are not expected to be too hot fo r safe handling using typical PPE. Thicker nitrile gloves may be used during sampling if sample bottles are too hot to hold. Samplers will handle extremely hot sa mples with heat-resistant gloves.

6.5.3 Chemical Hazards

The only chemical hazards expected are ch emicals used to preserve samples. All sampling team members will be advised of any potential chemical hazards at each sampling point as well as any special PPE recommendations during the formal heal th and safety briefing. If the sample tap (i.e., the point from which the wastewater flows) is above waist height, a face shield or goggles must be worn during samp le collection. To avoid ingesting chemicals, sampling team members will be required to wash hands thoroughly before eating or drinking. ERG personnel will not be permitted to enter areas where the plant has determined that respiratory protection equipment is necessary to protect against inhalation hazards.

6.6 Temperature Extremes

Extremely hot temperatures can be a health and safety hazard for this sampling episode. ERG personnel will take precautions to avoi d injuries due to extreme temperatures.

6.6.1 Heat Stress

Heat stress is not only a concern in hot/hum id outdoor environments; it is a concern due to the thermal or radiant heat generated by equi pment and/or processes. Sampling team personnel will monitor each other for the following symptoms:

Heat rash that may result from continuous exposure to heat or humid air. Treatment: Wear cotton clothing under coveralls or Tyvek®.

Heat cramps that are caused by heavy sweati ng and inadequate elect rolyte replacement. Many times, cramps may not occur until after work or until the worker is sleeping. Signs and symptoms include muscle spasms and pain in the hands, feet,

and abdomen.

Treatment: Gently stretch and massage mu scles and replace fluids. Have worker

rest in a cool shaded area.6-6 Heat exhaustion that occurs from increas ed stress on various body organs including inadequate blood circulation due to card iovascular insufficiency or dehydration. Signs and symptoms include:

— Pale, cool, moist, clammy skin

— Heavy sweating

— Headache and dizziness

— Nausea

— Fainting or fatigue

— Elevated pulse rate (above 150)

Treatment: Replace fluids, pour cool water over face, neck, hands, arms, and legs.

Place worker in cool air and seek medical care.

Heat stroke is the most serious form of heat stress. Temperature regulation fails and the body temperature rises to critical levels. Immediate action must be taken to cool the body before serious injury and death occur. Competent medical help must be obtained. Signs and symptoms are:

— Red, hot, usually dry skin, body core temperature 108°F (oral)

— Lack of or reduced perspiration

— Nausea

— Headache, dizziness, and confusion

— Strong, rapid pulse

— Coma

Treatment: Remove worker to cool area, saturate clothe s with cold water, wrap worker in wet cold sheets (if possi ble), monitor ABC (airway, breathing, circulation), treat for shock, and call em ergency services for basic life support (BLS) or advanced life support (ALS).

6.6.2 Heat Stress Monitoring

A worker who exhibits any of the above symptoms will be immediately relieved of responsibilities and reques ted to consume electrolyte fluid or c ool water while resting in a shaded

area. The individual should not return to work until symptoms are no longer recognizable. If symptoms appear critical, persist, or get wo rse, the crew chief will seek immediate medical attention for the employee. If the individual does resume work, he/she will be monitored for any

increase in heart rate for the remainder of his/he r shift. In addition, the worker will be requested to consume electrolyte flui d or cool water every hour.6-7 The crew chief will visually monitor workers hourly when:

Symptoms of heat stress are reported or observed;

Ambient temperatures exceed 70°F and workers are dressed in impervious clothing; or

Ambient temperatures exceed 90°F and wo rkers are dressed in normal clothing.

For sampling on this project, work periods wi ll be considered to be approximately two hours in length.

At ambient temperatures of 87°F and above, workers will be monitored for heat stress conditions by measuring the heart rate (HR) by radial (wrist) pulse fo r 30 seconds after one

minute of rest. The HR after one minute of rest should not exceed 110 beats per minute. If the heart beat is higher, the next work period will be shortened by 33 percent, while the length of rest period remains the same. If the pulse rate is still higher than 110 b eats per minute after one minute of rest in the next rest period, the fo llowing work cycle will be shortened by another 33 percent. This shortening of the work period must continue until the work er's HR is no greater than 110 beats per minute.

6.7 First Aid

First aid procedures in response to chemi cal exposures will be conducted in accordance with the appropriate MSDS for the chemical invol ved. If an incident occurs and MSDSs are not available for a particular hazardous chemical (e.g., wastewater), the following general first aid procedures will be performed:

Skin Contact – Rinse the affected area thor oughly and copiously with clean water. Seek

medical attention if irritation is experienced after cleaning.

Eye Contact – Flush the eyes thoroughly at the nearest eyewash station for 15 minutes. Follow up with medical attention.

Ingestion – Notify the hospital and carry out any procedures recommended.

The first aid kit will be maintained on each site in the equipment staging area. The

contents of the first aid kit will include at a minimum:

Adhesive bandages; Antiseptic wipes; A compress; An eyewash solution; Gauze pads; A cold pack; and A triangular bandage.

The injuries most likely to be encountered at Miami Fort are cuts and bruises; the first aid kit will be maintained and stocked accordingly.6-8 6.8 Sample Preservation and Safety Considerations

Water samples to be analyzed for various c ontaminants may be preserved with sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ), hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium hydroxi de (NaOH), an ammonium sulfate buffer solution (NH 4 SO 4 ), and/or sodium arsenite (NaAsO 2 ) before shipment to the analytical laboratory. Nitrile gloves and splash goggles must be worn when handling these corrosive chemicals to prevent chemical burns. Sample preservation must be performed in a wellventilated area (preferably an operational la b hood) to avoid pote ntial accumulation and inhalation of any toxic vapors. When pouring samples, skin prot ection must also be worn (longsleeved cotton coveralls or uncoated Tyvek®, safety glasses with side sh ields or splash goggles, and nitrile gloves). Sodium arsenite is a known carcinogen and toxic so ex tra care should be taken when handling any solutions containing sodium arsenite.

In some instances, the use of these pres ervation chemicals could create a chemical reaction (i.e., generation of heat or release of toxic vapors). For in stance, if acids are added to a wastewater sample containing cyanide or sulfides, dangerous and toxic vapors will be emitted. If the sample reacts violently, notify the crew chie f and stop preserving the sample immediately.

In the case of a chemical spill, the following procedures must be followed:

Don protective clothing (nitr ile gloves as a minimum).

Ventilate area (open doors, window s, or turn on ventilation).

Use spill control pillows or prepared neutraliz ers to contain/clean up spill. Do not add

water to acid.

Place spilled material in a heavy plastic containe r, label the container, and contact site for disposal information.

Notify the crew chief of the sp ill and the procedures used.

At any time, if personnel do not feel comforta ble about cleaning up the spilled material or if a large quantity has been spilled, notify site personnel. The site may have an emergency response team who will respond to the chemical spill.

In the case of fire, notify the site contact. If the fire can be easily extinguished using a portable fire extinguisher, and personnel have received fire extinguisher training, extinguish the fire using the por table extinguisher.

6.9 Training and Medical Monitoring Requirements

All ERG sampling crew personnel have partic ipated in ERG's annual eight-hour health and safety training program as specified by ERG's Corporate Health and Safety Policy. This training includes:

Toxicology; Exposure limits;6-9 Chemical, biological, and physical hazards; Heat and cold stress; Confined spaces;
PPE; Decontamination; and Emergency plans and procedures.

All ERG personnel involved with sample collection and pres ervation are active participants in the Medical Monitoring Pr ogram. Field sampling personnel have received a

baseline medical information review.

6.10 Shift Work Protocol

This subsection provides guidance for field personnel project sche dules and field work, particularly overtime. It is important to reme mber extended work schedules will contribute to poor production and motivation. All field teams w ill rotate to ensure that sampling team members receive sufficient rest to avoid inju ries resulting from fati gue or inattention.

It is common practice to perform 12-hour wo rk days under project management direction. If this work schedule is exceeded, th e following guidelines will be recognized:

1. A maximum work day will be 15 hours, provided that it does not occur on consecutive days, or more than th ree times in ANY SEVEN-DAY PERIOD.

2. Each shift will be followed by nine hours off per 24-hour period, excluding driving time to and from the hotel.

3. No more than seven consecutive days of work will be allowed without a

minimum of 24 hours off.

4. Each work day will be reviewed as a 24- hour cycle to assure all field workers receive adequate time off.6-10 Table 6-1. Sample-Point-Specific PPE and Potential Hazards

Sampling

Point Number Sampling Point Description PPE Required a Potential Physical Hazards b

SP-1 Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment System Steel-toed boots, hard hats, gloves, safety glasses, and face/goggles shield while connecting and disconnecting tubing from the sample tap. Splash hazard: Potential for splashing from the sample tap. Sample tap will be below waist

level. Trip hazard: Potential for samplers to trip on the beams on the top of the equalization

tank. Slip hazard: The equalization

tank is at an incline and in wet

conditions the surface could be slippery. Samplers will put

“non-skid” mats in the sampling area. Fall hazard: The equalization

tank is located 28 feet above ground, but there is a railing surrounding the perimeter of

the tank.

SP-2/SP-3 Effluent from the FGD Wastewater Treatment System Steel-toed boots, hard hats, gloves, and safety glasses, and face/goggles shield while connecting and disconnecting tubing from the sample tap. Splash hazard: Potential for splashing from the sample tap. Sample tap will be below waist

level.

a – Splash protection (face shield) required if sampling port is waist high or above. Hearing protection (ear plugs)

will be worn if needed. b – Additional physical hazards, if any, will be identified during the formal on-site he alth and safety briefing. Updates to this table will be made as needed.7-1 7. R EFERENCES

1. Eastern Research Group, Inc. 2009. Generic Sampling and Analysis Plan for Coal-Fired

Steam Electric Power Plants . (February).

2. U.S. EPA. 2009. Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category: Final Detailed Study Report . EPA 821-R-09-008. Washington, DC. (October). Available online

at: http://www.epa.gov/guide/steam/finalreport.pdf. DCN SE00003

.