alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
William MAY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-0554

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
ex109descriptionofcompen






  DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS  FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS  For the period between each annual meeting of shareholders (the “Board Year”), non-employee directors  receive the following compensation:  • an annual equity award of $195,000 granted in shares of State Street common stock; and  • an annual retainer of $90,000, plus the following additional annual retainers:  • Lead Director: $125,000;  • Examining and Audit Committee Chair and Risk Committee Chair: $30,000;  • Human Resources Committee Chair: $25,000;  • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair  and Technology and Operations  Committee Chair: $20,000; and  • Each member of the Examining and Audit Committee and each member of the Risk Committee,  other than the Lead Director and the Committee Chairs: $20,000.    Each retainer is payable at the director’s election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash. All  awards of shares of State Street common stock are calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on  the NYSE on the date of election (or the date of joining the Board, if later), rounded up to the nearest whole  share. Annual retainers and annual equity awards are prorated for any director joining the Board after the  beginning of the Board Year.  Beginning with the eleventh Board meeting attended during the Board Year, each non-employee director is  entitled to meeting fees of $1,500 per Board meeting attended, payable in cash.  Pursuant to State Street’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, directors may elect to defer the receipt  of 0% or 100% of their (1) retainers, (2) annual equity award and/or (3) meeting fees. Non-employee directors also  may elect to receive their retainers in cash or shares of State Street common stock. Non-employee directors who  elect to defer the cash payment of their retainers or meeting fees may choose from four notional investment  fund returns for such deferred cash. Deferrals of common stock are adjusted to reflect the hypothetical  reinvestment in additional shares of common stock for any dividends or distributions on State Street common  stock. Deferred amounts will be paid (a) as elected by the non-employee director, on either the date of their  termination of service on the Board or on the earlier of such termination and a future date specified, and (b) in the  form elected by the non-employee director as either a lump sum or in installments over a two- to five-year period.  Non-employee directors are also entitled to reimbursement of expenses incurred in attending Board and  committee meetings.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 63 (Friday, April 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15318-15319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7467]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11696]


Montana Disaster <greek-i>MT-00042 Declaration of Economic Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

[[Page 15319]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Montana, dated 03/26/2009.
    Incident: Bozeman Explosion.
    Incident Period: 03/05/2009.
    Effective Date: 03/26/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/28/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Gallatin.
Contiguous Counties:
    Montana:
    Broadwater, Jefferson, Madison, Meagher, Park.
    Idaho: Fremont.
    Wyoming: Park, Teton.

    The Interest Rate is: 4.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 116960.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are: 
Montana, Idaho, Wyoming.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: March 26, 2009.
Darryl K. Hairston,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-7467 Filed 4-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Michael HARDY, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Elizabeth DUNCAN, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1914

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the
"Corporation")  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2006,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Corporation
certifies  that:

     (1)  The Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Corporation.


Date: May 5, 2006


                                          /s/ T. Gary Trimm
                                        -------------------------
                                        T. Gary Trimm
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)
May 15, 2018

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FELIX RAMIREZ, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-18-00325-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Samuel CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3476

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
F"AA- 2010-0546

Contacts, With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization

National Businc.''is Aircrafl Association

R~iollal Airline Assodalion

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association

ATA

Person Contacted

E:liCotti

Dave Lottcrcr

Robert Hackman

Craig Fabian

Date Response

--

--

-
STATE EX REL. Theoshamond NORMAN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2040

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST FELICIANA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails *546to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Timothy TIMMEL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Frederick Timmel, Jr., Appellant, v. Anita May TIMMEL and Robert Frederick Timmel, Jr., Appellees.

No. 1D17-5138

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 20, 2018

Michael D. Tidwell, Douglas D. Tidwell, and Benjamin L. Alexander, Pensacola, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

*1296Upon consideration of Appellant's response to the Court's order of March 9, 2018, the appeal is dismissed. *See**Bennett's Leasing, Inc. v. First Street Mortgage Corp.* , 870 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). The dismissal is without prejudice to Appellant's right to seek appellate review upon entry of a final order.

Wolf, Roberts, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. David A. BLUM, M.D., P.A., a/a/o Vanessa Moreno, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2018]

Douglas H. Stein of Association Law Group, P.L., Miami, for appellant.

Marlene S. Reiss, Miami, and Thomas J. Wenzel of Cindy A. Goldstein, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellee.

Kuntz, J.

*853We are presented with the following question, certified by the county court to be of great public importance:

> PURSUANT TO FLA. STAT. § 627.739, IS AN INSURER REQUIRED TO APPLY THE DEDUCTIBLE TO 100% OF AN INSURED'S EXPENSES AND LOSSES PRIOR TO APPLYING ANY PERMISSIVE FEE SCHEDULE PAYMENT LIMITATION FOUND IN § 627.736(5)(A)(1), FLA. STAT. (2013)?

We rephrase the certified question as follows:

> PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 627.736 AND 627.739, FLORIDA STATUTES (2013), IS AN INSURER REQUIRED TO APPLY A POLICY DEDUCTIBLE TO THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF A PROVIDER'S INVOICES TO AN INSURED PRIOR TO APPLYING ANY FEE SCHEDULE FOUND IN § 627.736, FLA. STAT.?

For the reasons explained in our opinion in *State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Care Wellness Center, LLC a/a/o Bardon-Diaz* , No. 4D16-2254, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 1315026 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 14, 2018), also issued today, we answer the rephrased certified question in the negative, reverse the county court's summary judgment, and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in case number 4D16-2254. We also certify conflict with *Progressive Select Insurance Co. v. Florida Hospital Medical Center a/a/o Jonathan Parent* , 236 So.3d 1183, 2018 WL 792012 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 9, 2018).

*Reversed and remanded; conflict certified.*

Forst, J., concurs.

Gross, J., dissents with opinion.

Gross, J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissent to the Court's opinion in *USAA Gen. Indem. Co. v. Gogan a/a/o Tara Ricks* , No. 4D16-3313, 238 So.3d 937, 2018 WL 1315053 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 14, 2018).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.                     

*Date:*                         April 30-May 1, 2009.                     

*Time:*                         7 p.m. to 3 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Admiral Fell Inn, 888 South Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21231.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Camilla E. Day, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, CIDR, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4075, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8837,                         *camilla.day@nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 31, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-7716 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10097

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PRISCILLA DeVITA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

(5:02-CR-91-2)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court affirmed Priscilla DeVita’s conviction and

sentence, following a jury trial, for conspiracy and aiding and

abetting to take a motor vehicle resulting in serious bodily

injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 2119, and 2119(2).

United States v. Devita, 03-10097, 86 Fed. Appx. 738 (5th Cir. 10

Feb. 2004) (unpublished). The Supreme Court granted Devita’s

petition for writ of certiorari and for leave to proceed in forma
2

pauperis; vacated our previous judgment; and remanded the case for

further consideration in the light of United States v. Booker, 543

U.S. ___, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). DeVita v. United States, 125 S.

Ct. 1032 (2005). 

We requested supplemental briefs from the parties addressing

the impact of Booker. DeVita filed a supplemental brief, claiming

reversible plain error; citing new authority, discussed below, the

Government moved to reinstate the prior affirmance of DeVita’s

conviction and sentence, or, in the alternative, for an extension

of time to file its supplemental brief. Other than advising the

Government that she opposes its motion, DeVita did not respond. 

DeVita did not raise Booker-error until her petition for writ

of certiorari. Absent extraordinary circumstances, we will not

consider a defendant’s Booker-related claims presented for the

first time in a petition for writ of certiorari. United States v.

Taylor, 409 F.3d 675, 676 (5th Cir. 2005). DeVita has not

demonstrated the requisite extraordinary circumstances. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s motion to reinstate prior

affirmance of Appellant’s conviction and sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative request for

an extension of time of 14 days from the court’s denial of the

motion to reinstate prior affirmance of Appellant’s conviction and

sentence to file its supplemental brief is DENIED AS MOOT.
Hewitt Rigdon WEEKS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1449

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John R. MARTIN, etc., Appellant, v. COBO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2724

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christopher EMBREE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3010

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 18, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, February 12, 2018 and Tuesday, February 13, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be held Monday, February 12, 2018, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time and Tuesday, February 13, 2018, from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time at the IRS Office, Jacksonville, Florida. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to                           ( print page 2726)                        limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Otis Simpson. For more information please contact Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: January 10, 2018.

Antoinette Ross,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2018-00733 Filed 1-17-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Thomas Eugene BERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3745

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 8 (Thursday, January 11, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1302-1303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00288]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0266; FRL-9972-90-Region 1]


Air Plan Approval; NH; Approval of Recordkeeping and Reporting 
Requirements and Single Source Order; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of adverse comments, the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the November 14, 2017 direct 
final rule approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions 
submitted by the State of New Hampshire. New Hampshire's SIP revisions 
modified existing recordkeeping and reporting requirements for sources 
of air pollution, and modified an existing order for Sturm Ruger & 
Company. This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air 
Act.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 82 FR 52664 on November 14, 
2017 is withdrawn effective January 11, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob McConnell, Air Quality Planning 
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New England Regional 
Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 
02109--3912, telephone (617) 918-1046, facsimile (617) 918-0146, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#38555b5b5756565d5454164a575a5d4a4c785d4859165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6cbc5c5c9c8c8c3caca88d4c9c4c3d4d2e6c3d6c788c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if 
adverse comments were submitted by December 14, 2017, the rule would be 
withdrawn and not take effect. EPA received adverse comments prior to 
the close of the comment period and,

[[Page 1303]]

therefore, is withdrawing the direct final rule. EPA will address the 
comments in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed rule also 
published on November 14, 2017 (82 FR 52683). EPA will not institute a 
second comment period on this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Regional haze, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: December 22, 2017.
Kenneth Moraff,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.

0
Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 52.1520 published on November 14, 
2017 (82 FR 52664) are withdrawn effective January 11, 2018.

[FR Doc. 2018-00288 Filed 1-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>