alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Chief Financial Officer Certification
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Mark Szporka

Mark Szporka, Chief Financial Officer
STATE EX REL. Shawanda Marie NEVERS-HAWKINS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-0042

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Schmid, Chief Financial Officer of Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon my knowledge:



|(1) | this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2014 |  | /s/ John Schmid        
|                     |  | John Schmid            
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the
"Corporation")  for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2005, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Corporation
certifies  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the  Corporation.


Date: February 6, 2006


                                       /s/ T. Gary Trimm
                                      ------------------------
                                      T. Gary Trimm
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 17

- 00859

- CV

Maria VALDEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE MC CLENAHAN LAW FIRM and The J. Guerra Law Firm,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 01421

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 28, 2018

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee s

, who have not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appe al are taxed against appellant. See id. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Scientific Committee (SC); 
Announcement of Plenary Session

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The OCS Scientific Committee will meet at the Sheraton 
Anchorage Hotel in Anchorage, AK.

DATES: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Thursday, 
April 30, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; and Friday, May 1, 2009, 8 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Sheraton Anchorage Hotel, 401 E. 6th Avenue, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99501, telephone (907) 276-8700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the agenda may be requested 
from MMS by calling Ms. Carolyn Beamer at (703) 787-1211. Other 
inquiries concerning the OCS SC meeting should be addressed to Dr. 
James Kendall, Executive Secretary to the OCS SC, Minerals Management 
Service, 381 Elden Street, Mail Stop 4043, Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817 
or by calling (703) 787-1656.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OCS SC will provide advice on the 
feasibility, appropriateness, and scientific value of the OCS 
Environmental Studies Program to the Secretary of the Interior through 
the Director of the MMS. The SC will review the relevance of the 
research and data being produced to meet MMS scientific information 
needs for decision making and may recommend changes in scope, 
direction, and emphasis.
    The Committee will meet in plenary session on Wednesday, April 29. 
The Deputy Associate Director will address the Committee on the general 
status of the MMS and its activities. There will be an update on OCS 
activities in the Alaska OCS Region and Regional Supervisors for 
Environment and Leasing from each region will present an overview of 
the Environmental Studies Program and current issues.
    On Thursday, April 30, the Committee will meet in discipline 
breakout groups (i.e., biology/ecology, physical sciences, and social 
sciences) to review the specific research plans of the MMS regional 
offices for Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011.
    On Friday, May 1, the Committee will meet in plenary session for 
reports of the individual discipline breakout sessions of the previous 
day and to continue with Committee business.
    The meetings are open to the public. Approximately 30 visitors can 
be accommodated on a first-come-first-served basis at the plenary 
session.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 5 
U.S.C., Appendix I, and the Office of Management and Budget's 
Circular A-63, Revised.

    Date: March 24, 2009.
Chris C. Oynes,
Associate Director for Offshore Energy and Minerals Management.
 [FR Doc. E9-7060 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 101 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 101

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a reduced excise 
     tax rate for portable, electronically-aerated bait containers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2023

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a reduced excise 
     tax rate for portable, electronically-aerated bait containers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fishing Equipment Tax Relief Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. THREE PERCENT RATE FOR PORTABLE, ELECTRONICALLY-AERATED BAIT 
              CONTAINERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4161(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5) and by 
inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) 3 percent rate for portable, electronically-aerated 
        bait containers.--In the case of portable, electronically-
        aerated bait containers, paragraph (1) shall be applied by 
        substituting `3 percent' for `10 percent'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer after 
December 31, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
Timothy D. MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4145

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

```

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Walter Thomas Price III                                                                                                                   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Walter Thomas Price IIIPrincipal Executive OfficerPrice Asset Management, Inc.Managing MemberRICI® Linked – PAM Advisors Fund, LLC |   |
|   |  August 30, 2011                                                                                                                         |   |

```

```

----
Bert P. ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3795

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
November 10,2015 Memorandum Subject: November 5, 2015 Meeting Between the Anadarko and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) From: 

### ('~~.~7~~~

**Christop~r""'St~eman,** Policy Advisor Outreach and Information Division, Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) To: Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0606 This memorandum to docketprovides a briefsummary ofthe main discussion points made at the subject meeting for the proposed rulemaking: "ReviewofNew Sources and Modifications in Indian Country: Federal Implementation Plan for Managing Air Emissions from True Minor Sources Engaged in Oil and Natural Gas Production in Indian Country," (80 Federal Register 56554, September 18, 2015). Meeting details: When: November 5, 2015; 1:30-3:30p.m. ET Where: EPA Offices, RTP, NC EPAparticipants:

Name EPA Office Bruce Moore Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards LisaThompson Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards Cheryl Vetter Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards Amy Hambrick Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards MatthewWitosky Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards David Cozzie Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards Lourdes Morales Office ofAjr Quality Planning and Standards Christopher Stoneman Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards Greg Nizich Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards Suzie Waltzer Office ofAtmospheric Programs Jameel Alsalam Office ofAtmospheric Programs Claudia Smith Region 8 Carl Daly Region 8 Anadarko:

Name Company Chad Shlichtemeir Anadarko Angela Zivkovich Anadarko Julia Jones AnadarkoOther: 

# IName Company EC/R The EPA met with Anadarko at the energy organization's request. During the meeting, several topics were discussed related to the proposed rulemaking. The topics were:

• Transition for areas ofIndian country under the proposed Federal Implementation Plan from attainmentto nonattainment; • Issues associated withpre-construction registration; and • Processes and requirements related to the Endangered Species Act and the National Historic PreservationAct. The EPA answered basic questions clarifying its thinking onthe proposed rule and offered to be available for further discussions and/or exchanges oftechnical information. This memorandum will be filed inthe docket for the above actions and will be available for public review.

2
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Veramark Technologies, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David G.
Mazzella, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

/s/ David G. Mazzella
David G. Mazzella
President, Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003

19
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1057 

To require responsiveness testing of Defense Logistics Agency pharmaceutical 

contracts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Ms. WARREN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require responsiveness testing of Defense Logistics 

Agency pharmaceutical contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Further Strengthening 

5 Supply Chains for Servicemembers and Security Act of 

6 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1057 IS

1 SEC. 2. RESPONSIVENESS TESTING OF DEFENSE LOGISTICS 

2 AGENCY PHARMACEUTICAL CONTRACTS. 

3 The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall 

4 modify Defense Logistics Agency Instructions 5025.03 

5 and 3110.01— 

6 (1) to require Defense Logistics Agency Troop 

7 Support to coordinate annually with customers in 

8 the military departments to conduct responsiveness 

9 testing of the Defense Logistics Agency’s contin10 gency contracts for pharmaceuticals; and 

11 (2) to include the results of that testing, as re12 ported by customers in the military departments, in 

13 the annual reports of the Warstopper Program. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL 14, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean L. Cash, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Associates 14, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   March 28, 2011





/s/ Dean L. CashDean L. CashChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer of ATEL Associates 14, LLC,(Managing Member)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**ofRegulation AB**

I, Victor A. De Jesus, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofWorld Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2009 (the“Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2009-A, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows: 

(i)        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2009 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision. 

(ii)       To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as of March 18, 2010.
Frandric MICHEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2728

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Lester FAWKES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R.A. CASTRO, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-55657.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Lester Fawkes, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

Gerson Simon, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Analee J. Brodie, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: BROWNING, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ** AND ORDER

Petitioner Lester Fawkes appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

1. We deny the motion to expand the certificate of appealability. The issue of expert testimony was not raised in the habeas petition or in district court. The issue concerning contrived self-defense does not raise a substantial showing of the *782denial of a constitutional right, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

2. Sufficient evidence supported Petitioner’s conviction for first-degree murder. The jury’s failure to reach a verdict on the robbery charge did not negate the finding of “malice” necessary to convict for premeditated murder, and there was evidence of premeditation through planning, motive, and the manner of killing. *People v. Anderson,*70 Cal.2d 15, 73 Cal.Rptr. 550, 447 P.2d 942, 949 (1968). The jury rationally could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Petitioner deliberately decided to kill Kevin Hall for failing to pay a drug debt in full; he traveled from out of state, went to find Hall while armed, trapped Hall in a car, and shot him several times at close range. The jury’s inability to agree on whether Petitioner also was trying to take money from Hall at the time does not diminish any of this evidence. The evidence was sufficient and the verdict consistent. Although Petitioner testified that he acted in self-defense, Laura Heath’s testimony contradicted his and the jury was not required to believe him.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Jamie SNYDER, Appellant/Petitioner(s) v. Thom BROWN, Jr., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2072

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
David Wayne SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3620 4D16-3626 4D16-3627 4D16-3628

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 11, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN RE COMMITMENT OF Frank HALL.

Frank Hall, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1125

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kurt MARIN, Maurice Symonette and Michael Albertine, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Indenture Trustee FOR IMPAC REAL ESTATE ASSET TRUST SERIES 2006-SDI, Erron Reid, Josie Belorme a/k/a Josia S. Belorme, Etchika M. Pierre a/k/a Etchika Pierre, State of Florida, Department of Revenue, and KeyBank N.A., Appellees.

No. 4D17-0277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.