alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc.
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  November 13, 2008
    By:

/s/ Ronald C. LundyRonald C. LundyVice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT/COMMERCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellants, v. Oscar SANCHEZ, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5794

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1  [lake_logo.gif]  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the use, in the report on Form 10-K of mBeach Software, Inc. (A Development Stage Company), of our report dated May 13, 2010 on our audit of the financial statements of mBeach Software, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of April 30, 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity/(deficit) and cash flows from inception on April 24, 2009 through April 30, 2010, and the reference to us under the caption Experts.  /s/ Lake & Associates, CPAs LLC Lake & Associates, CPAs LLC Boca Raton, Florida May 13, 2010   1905 Wright Boulevard20283 State Road 7, Suite 300Schaumburg, IL 60193Boca Raton, Florida 33498Phone: 847.524.0800Phone:866.982.9874Fax: 847.524.1655Fax: 561.982.7985
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Justin Nathanial SHROYER, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from [identify
specific financial statement(s)] and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statement(s).
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                       166
<INVENTORY>                                     12,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,796
<PP&E>                                          13,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,313
<SALES>                                         18,808
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,808
<CGS>                                           13,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,644
<INCOME-TAX>                                       641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,003
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11



</TABLE>
From: ASRAC

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:10:33 AM (UTC

- 05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: 'Hatzikazakis, Pantelis'; ASRAC

Subject: RE: Commercial Certification Group meeting of 4/30/13

Mr. Hatzikazakis,

The primary goals of the April 30th meeting will be:

1. Learn more about the task of the working group (to negotiate rulemaking on certification and

enforcement for commercial heating, ventilation, and air- conditioning (HVAC), water heating

(WH), and refrigeration equipment).

2. Discuss to set a work plan to complete the task and meet required deadlines (i.e., during

February 27 meeting of the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Com mittee

decided that the working group will be asked for a status update by June 26, 2013 and the

deadline for final consensus to ASRAC is September 1, 2013).

Very Respectfully,

Jeremiah Freeman

New West Technologies, LLC

In support of:

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Office: 202

- 586

- 1867

Cell: 202

- 431

- 4243

Alternative mail: jfreeman@nwttech.com

From: Hatzikazakis, Pantelis [ mailto:Pantelis.Hatzikazakis@Lennoxind.com ]

Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 5:20 PM

To: ASRAC

Subject: Commercial Certification Group meeting of 4/30/13

Importance: High



### Attention of: John Cymbalsky

John!

I’m one of the Selected Members of the Commercial Certification Group.

I like to know if you have any other details for the goals of the 4/30 meeting.

Thank you!

Pantelis

972- 497

- 7762
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15519-15520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UTU 13113]


Opening of National Forest System Land; Utah

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Realty Action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public Land Order No. 7662 partially revoked Public Land Order 
No. 5047. This order opens the previously withdrawn land to mining.

DATES: Effective Date: May 6, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhonda Flynn, BLM Utah State Office, 
440 West 200 South, Suite 500, Salt

[[Page 15520]]

Lake City, Utah 84101-1345, 801-539-4132.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    1. Public Land Order No. 7662 (71 FR 26108 (2006)) partially 
revoked Public Land Order No. 5047. The United States Forest Service 
has decided that the previously withdrawn land, described below, can be 
opened to the United States mining laws:

Sawtooth National Forest

Salt Lake Meridian

T. 14 N., R. 13 W.,

    Sec. 8, E\1/2\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 9, S\1/2\S\1/2\ and S\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 200 acres in Box Elder County.

    2. At 10 a.m. on May 6, 2009, the land described in Paragraph 1 
above will be opened to location and entry under the United States 
mining laws, subject to valid existing rights, the provisions of 
existing withdrawals, other segregations of record, and the 
requirements of applicable law. Appropriation of any of the land 
described in this order under the general mining laws prior to the date 
and time of restoration is unauthorized. Any such attempted 
appropriation, including attempted adverse possession under 30 U.S.C. 
38 (2000), shall vest no rights against the United States. Acts 
required to establish a location and to initiate a right of possession 
are governed by State law where not in conflict with Federal law. The 
Bureau of Land Management will not intervene in disputes between rival 
locators over possessory rights since Congress has provided for such 
determinations in local courts.

(Authority: 43 CFR 2091.6)

    Dated: February 13, 2009.
Selma Sierra,
State Director.
 [FR Doc. E9-7687 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 06-1517

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

BELEN NIEVES-CASTAÑO,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on March 27, 2007 is amended

as follows:

On page 2, line 4: Insert the word "of" between "possession"

and "a."

On page 2, line 20: Replace the word "era" with the word

"rea."

On page 5, line 4: Replace the number "18" with the number

"26."

On page 5, line 19: Replace the number "18" with the number

"26."

On page 11, line 10: In place of the two spaces between "B."

and "Constitutionality," insert a line indent.
Demario Voncarloslenard RAYSOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5870

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Joseph F. Fisher, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge
and belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings,
Ltd.


Date: November 9, 2004      /s/ JOSEPH F. FISHER
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            By: Joseph F. Fisher
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6895

FRANKIE D. JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cv-00415-RGD-DEM)

Submitted: October 20, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frankie D. Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, and 

the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its final order denying § 2254 relief on December 4, 2019, 

and entered its order denying the motion for reconsideration on January 24, 2020. Jones 

filed the notice of appeal on June 7, 2020, well beyond the appeal period for both orders.

*

 

Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening 

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date Jones could have delivered the notice to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of Continan Communications, Inc. (“Continan”). Questions have been raised about the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, the current liabilities of the company. Continan securities are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and the Pink Sheets operated by Pink OTC Markets Inc. under the trading symbol CNTN.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of Continan is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 1, 2009, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 15, 2009.

By the Commission.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-7646 Filed 4-1-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2017

s1212 

# Order

Clerk January 5, 2017

154162

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154162

COA: 333042

Washtenaw CC: 05

- 002085

- FC

MAURICE OAKLEY CLAY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Exhibit 32





Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the “Act”) and Rule 15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), each of the undersigned, Mack Sanders, Chief Executive Officer of EVCARCO, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Nikolay Frolov, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 15 , 2011


By:
/s/ Mack SandersMack SandersChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)By:
/s/ Nikolay FrolovNikolay FrolovChief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         281,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,549,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,831,030
<PP&E>                                         220,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,065,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          854,948
<BONDS>                                        500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,543
<COMMON>                                        49,833
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,655,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,065,977
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,071,340
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,325,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,308,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,309,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,309,917
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>

      In connection with the Annual Report of EFT BioTech Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Jack Jie Qin, the Principal
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.



September 22, 2010                       By:  /s/ Jack Jie Qin
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Jack Jie Qin, Principal Executive and
                                          Financial Officer
August 22, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LINDA KELLY STROTHER, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00599-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.