alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

EXHIBIT 10.28

THIRD AMENDMENT
TO THE
CATERPILLAR INC.
DEFERRED EMPLOYEES’ INVESTMENT PLAN
Caterpillar Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors the Caterpillar Inc. Deferred Employees’ Investment Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan was most recently amended and restated effective May 15, 2017 by a document dated May 9, 2017.  Pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan, in whole or in part, at any time. By this instrument, the Company amends the Plan to reflect overpayment recovery changes.
    1.    This Third Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2022.
    2.    Article X of the Plan is amended to add a new Section 10.13 to read as follows:
“10.13       Overpayments.  If it is determined that the benefits under the Plan should not have been paid or should have been paid in a lesser amount, the Plan has the right at any time to, as elected by the Plan Administrator: (i) recover the overpayment from the recipient to whom it was made; (ii) offset the amount of that overpayment from a future payment to the recipient; or (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii).  The Plan Administrator or the Company may also take all actions permissible under law and applicable guidance to recover for the Plan the amount of the overpayment.”
    3.    This Third Amendment amends only the provisions of the Plan as noted herein, and those provisions not expressly amended shall be considered in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Third Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions and the intent of this Third Amendment.
			
	








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Third Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of December 15, 2021.


												
	CATERPILLAR INC.
	
	  /s/ Cheryl H. Johnson
	
	Cheryl H. Johnson
	Chief Human Resources Officer




			
	

2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00757-CV

FEDEX CORPORATION and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Michelle CONTRERAS, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Christopher 

Talamantez, II, Deceased; Krystal Saldana as Next Friend of C.M.T., II and J.T., Minors; 

Victoria Campos as Next Friend of D.C., a Minor; Christopher Talamantez, Sr.; Aurelio 

Fernando Perez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Christian Adam Vasquez, 

Deceased; and Alexis Sanchez, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Christian 

Vasquez, Deceased and as Next Friend of C.V., Jr., a Minor,

Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CI-22752

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order denying the 

special appearances of appellants FedEx Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. is 

REVERSED. We RENDER judgment dismissing the claims raised by appellees Michelle 

Contreras, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Christopher Talamantez, II, 

Deceased; Krystal Saldana as Next Friend of C.M.T., II and J.T., Minors; Victoria Campos as Next 

Friend of D.C., a Minor; Christopher Talamantez, Sr.; Aurelio Fernando Perez, Individually and 

as Representative of the Estate of Christian Adam Vasquez, Deceased; and Alexis Sanchez, 

Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Christian Vasquez, Deceased and as Next Friend 

of C.V., Jr., a Minor against FedEx Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. for lack of 

personal jurisdiction. We ORDER appellees to pay the costs of this appeal.

SIGNED August 19, 2020.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Companys
consolidated  balance  sheet  at  March  31,  1998 and Consolidated Statement of
Operations  for  the  nine  months ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its
entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        4877 
<SECURITIES>                                     0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                22076 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   545 
<INVENTORY>                                   6475 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             35054 
<PP&E>                                       35196 
<DEPRECIATION>                               22607 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               48993 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        23311 
<BONDS>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                       474 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0 
<PREFERRED>                                      0 
<OTHER-SE>                                   23692 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 48993 
<SALES>                                      28169 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             62015 
<CGS>                                        13916 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                31768 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             609 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               4660 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   932 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           3728 
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0 
<CHANGES>                                        0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  3728 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .02 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02 
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1 / 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Eagleford Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Cassina, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



|/s/ James Cassina |                                      
|----------------- | -------------------------------------
|Name:             | James Cassina                        
|Title:            | Chief Executive and Financial Officer
|Date:             | December 24, 2013
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 933 

Expressing opposition to New York’s Clean Slate Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. D’ESPOSITO (for himself, Ms. STEFANIK, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. LAWLER, Ms. 

MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. LALOTA, Mr. GARBARINO, Mr. WILLIAMS of New 

York, Mr. LANGWORTHY, and Mr. MOLINARO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing opposition to New York’s Clean Slate Act. 

Whereas the Clean Slate Act was signed into law November 

16, 2023, by New York Governor Kathy Hochul; 

Whereas this legislation will automatically seal from public 

view the criminal records of eligible misdemeanors after 

3 years and certain felonies after 8 years following the 

individual’s release from incarceration or the imposition 

of sentence as long as they do not have additional subsequent charges; 

Whereas the Clean Slate Act will prohibit many New Yorkers 

from conducting a comprehensive background check on 

someone they want to hire to work in their home or at 

their business; 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 933 IH 

Whereas the Clean Slate Act will only empower criminals at 

the expense of New York State law abiding citizens; 

Whereas, in 2022, New York City experienced a 22-percent 

increase in overall major crime compared with 2021; 

Whereas one of the government’s most important responsibilities is keeping its citizens safe and upholding justice; 

Whereas New York has a history of soft-on-crime laws such 

as cashless bail, eliminating the dangerousness standard, 

and other harmful policies; 

Whereas all employers should be able to access information 

necessary to make informed hiring decisions for their 

businesses; 

Whereas the New York Police Department already faces 

budget cuts and hiring freezes, making it even more difficult to combat crime in New York City; and 

Whereas New York State should be doing everything in its 

power to tackle crime and prioritize the public safety of 

all residents: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) disapproves of the Clean Slate Act; and 

3 (2) urges New York State to prioritize policies 

4 that prevent crime, support law enforcement officers, 

5 and keep all New Yorkers safe. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,256]


Pine Hosiery Mills, Incorporated, Star, NC; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 17, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Pine 
Hosiery Mills, Incorporated, Star, North Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7754 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,146-01

EX P ARTE JAMES WADE ELROD, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 11,834-A IN THE 46TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM WILBARG ER COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of the offense of burg lary of a ha bitation and sentenc ed to imprisonment for eig ht y ear s. On J uly 3, 2019, an order desig nating issues was signe d by the trial court. The habea s rec ord has been proper ly forwa

rded to this Court by the district cler k pursuant to T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the rec ord has been forwa rded without the trial co u rt h av i n g resolved the desig nated issue(s) in this case . We remand this applica tion to the 46 District Court of Wil barg er County to t h allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y investiga tion and en t er fi n dings of fac t andconclusions of law

.

This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s o f t h i s o rd er. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.

Filed: Aug ust 21, 2019 Do not publish
Wayne A. GREENE, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1980

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3984

___________ Kelvin Moore, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the David Inman, * Eastern District of Missouri. * Appellee. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: October 4, 2006 Filed: October 17, 2006

___________ Before RILEY, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Kelvin Moore (Moore) appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 comp laint. Moore alle ged David Inman, an officer with the Caruthersville Police Depart ment, searched his vehicle in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We grant Moore leave to appeal in fo rma pauperis. Follo wing de novo review, see Moore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude preservice dismissal was inappropriate. It is not apparent on this record that success on Moore’s claim would necessarily imply th e invalidity of any state court conviction. See Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 487 n.7 (1994) (because of doctrines like-2- independent source, inevitable discovery, and harmless error, a damages suit for an unreasonable search may lie ev en if the challenged searchproduced evidence that was introduced at a state criminal trial resulting in § 1983 plaintiff’s still-outstanding conviction), Moore , 200 F.3d at 1171-72 (noting foot note 7 and concluding a § 1983 unlawful-seizure claim was not barred by Heck ). Further, there are no ongoing state proceedings that would justify the district court’s abstention. See Younger v. Harris , 401 U.S. 37, 43-54 (1971) (holding, with some exceptions, federal courts cannot grant injunctive relief that would interfere with ongoing state criminal prosecutions); Fuller v. Ulland , 76 F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir. 1996) ( under certain circumstances, Younger directs federal courts to abstain from h earing cases when there is an ongoing state judicial proceeding). Accordingly, we reverse the dismissa l and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1083658
<SECURITIES>                                   4002200
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2000276
<ALLOWANCES>                                     99000
<INVENTORY>                                     707116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7796083
<PP&E>                                         5811675
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4428687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13866483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4440975
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        759725
<OTHER-SE>                                     6610454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13866483
<SALES>                                        4693706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4693706
<CGS>                                           784957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4449939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 99000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 303171
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             303171
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    303171
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                       774
<INVENTORY>                                     19,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,273
<PP&E>                                          48,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,247
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,257
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,311
<SALES>                                         86,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,814
<CGS>                                           71,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    63
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    997
<INCOME-TAX>                                       350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                647
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         125,114
<SECURITIES>                                     2,406
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,522
<PP&E>                                       3,943,835
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,517,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,594,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,579,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,594,996
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,926
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                171,346
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            171,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   171,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.28
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      10.47

     

    Shenzhen
      Ping An Bank

    Loan
      Certificate (2)

     

    Date:
      September 6, 2007

     

    
      	
              Applicant

            	 	
              Shenzhen
                BAK Battery Co., Ltd

            	 	
              ID
                card of the Applicant

            	 	
              73109958-5

            
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
              Currency

            	 	
              RMB

            	 	
              Amount

            	 	
              20,000,000

            
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
              Loan
                Term

            	 	
              From
                September 6, 2007 to September 6, 2008

            
	 	 	 
	
              Usage

            	 	
              Working
                Capital

            
	 	 	 
	
              Annual
                rate

            	 	
              6.318
                %

            	 	
              Loan
                type

            	 	
              Short-term

            
	 	 	 
	
              Reference
                Contract

            	 	
              Shen
                shangyin (Shuibei) Shouxinzi (2007) A110020700007

            
	 	 	 
	
              Signature
                of Applicant

            	 	
              Stamp
                of Applicant

            	 	
              Signature
                of Shenzhen Ping An Bank

            	 	
              Stamp
                of Shenzhen Ping An Bank

            
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
              /s/
                Xiangqian Li

            	 	 	 	 	 	 


    

    


    The
      above
      loan has been approved to transfer to your account.

    Lending
      Bank: (Stamp)
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3826 — Trimoteur/Nibcapital/Fortis/Sandd)

(2005/C 166/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 June 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----