[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15533-15536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59652; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2009-027)


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed 
Rule Change To Extend the Pilot Program for NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds 
and To Reduce the Monthly Cap on Fees

March 30, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on March 25, 2009, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons, and is approving the 
proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ is proposing to extend for three months the pilot that 
created the NASDAQ Last Sale (``NLS'') market data products. NLS allows 
data distributors to have access to real-time market data for a capped 
fee, enabling those distributors to provide free access to the data to 
millions of individual investors via the internet and television. 
Specifically, NASDAQ offers the ``NASDAQ Last Sale for NASDAQ'' and 
``NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex'' data feeds containing last sale 
activity in US equities within the NASDAQ Market Center and reported to 
the jointly-operated FINRA/NASDAQ Trade Reporting Facility (``FINRA/
NASDAQ TRF''). The purpose of this proposal is to extend the existing 
pilot program for three months and to reduce the cap on applicable fees 
as set forth below.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Nasdaq will file a proposed rule change within thirty days 
seeking permanenet [sic] approval oft [sic] the Nasdaq Last Sale 
pilot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This pilot program supports the aspiration of Regulation NMS to 
increase the availability of proprietary data by allowing market forces 
to determine the amount of proprietary market data information that is 
made available to the public and at what price. During the current 
pilot period, the program has vastly increased the availability of 
NASDAQ proprietary market data to individual investors. Based upon data 
from NLS distributors, NASDAQ believes that since its launch in July 
2008, the NLS data has been viewed by over 50,000,000 investors on 
websites operated by Google, Interactive Data, and Dow Jones, among 
others. The text of the proposed rule change is available at NASDAQ, 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://nasdaq.complinet.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item III below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Prior to the launch of NLS, public investors that wished to view 
market data to monitor their portfolios generally had two choices: (1) 
Pay for real-time market data or (2) use free data that is 15 to 20 
minutes delayed. To increase consumer choice, NASDAQ proposed a four-
month pilot to offer access to real-time market data to data 
distributors for a capped fee, enabling those distributors to 
disseminate the data via the internet and television at no cost to 
millions of internet users and television viewers.
    NASDAQ now proposes a three-month extension of that pilot program 
and to reduce the capped fee to $50,000 per month from $150,000 per 
month.
    The NLS pilot created two separate ``Level 1'' products containing 
last sale activity within the NASDAQ market and reported to the 
jointly-operated FINRA/NASDAQ TRF. First, the ``NASDAQ Last Sale for 
NASDAQ Data Product,'' a real-time data feed that provides real-time 
last sale information including execution price, volume, and time for 
executions occurring within the NASDAQ system as well as those reported 
to the FINRA/NASDAQ TRF. Second, the NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex 
data product that provides real-time last sale information including 
execution price, volume, and time for NYSE- and Amex-securities 
executions occurring within the NASDAQ system as well as those reported 
to the FINRA/NASDAQ TRF.
    NASDAQ established two different pricing models, one for clients 
that are able to maintain username/password entitlement systems and/or 
quote counting mechanisms to account for usage, and a second for those 
that are not. Firms with the ability to maintain username/password 
entitlement systems

[[Page 15534]]

and/or quote counting mechanisms will be eligible for a specified fee 
schedule for the NASDAQ Last Sale for NASDAQ Product and a separate fee 
schedule for the NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex Product: Firms that 
were unable to maintain username/password entitlement systems and/or 
quote counting mechanisms will also have multiple options for 
purchasing the NASDAQ Last Sale data. These firms chose between a 
``Unique Visitor'' model for internet delivery or a ``Household'' model 
for television delivery. Unique Visitor and Household populations must 
be reported monthly and must be validated by a third-party vendor or 
ratings agency approved by NASDAQ at NASDAQ's sole discretion. In 
addition, to reflect the growing confluence between these media 
outlets, NASDAQ offered a reduction in fees when a single distributor 
distributes NASDAQ Last Sale Data Products via multiple distribution 
mechanisms.
    Second, NASDAQ established cap of $100,000 per month for NASDAQ 
Last Sale for NASDAQ and $50,000 per month for NASDAQ Last Sale for 
NYSE/Amex, for a total of up to $150,000 per month. The purpose of this 
proposal is to reduce the cap to $50,000 per month total for the NASDAQ 
Last Sale for NASDAQ and for NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex. This 
reduces the fee cap by $100,000 per month for vendors that purchased 
both data feeds in quantities sufficient to hit the fee cap. This fee 
reduction is necessary for Nasdaq to compete effectively against other 
exchanges that also offer last sale data for purchase or at no charge.
    Finally, as with the distribution of other NASDAQ proprietary 
products, all distributors of the NASDAQ Last Sale for NASDAQ and/or 
NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex products would pay a single $1500/month 
NASDAQ Last Sale Distributor Fee in addition to any applicable usage 
fees. The $1,500 monthly fee will apply to all distributors and will 
not vary based on whether the distributor distributes the data 
internally or externally or distributes the data via both the Internet 
and television.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\4\ in general and with Section 
6(b)(4) of the Act,\5\ as stated above, in that it provides an 
equitable allocation of reasonable fees among users and recipients of 
NASDAQ data. In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted self-
regulatory organizations and broker-dealers increased authority and 
flexibility to offer new and unique market data to the public. It was 
believed that this authority would expand the amount of data available 
to consumers, and also spur innovation and competition for the 
provision of market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f-3(b)(4) [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NASDAQ Last Sale market data products proposed here appear to 
be precisely the sort of market data product that the Commission 
envisioned when it adopted Regulation NMS. The Commission concluded 
that Regulation NMS--by deregulating the market in proprietary data--
would itself further the Act's goals of facilitating efficiency and 
competition:

    [E]fficiency is promoted when broker-dealers who do not need the 
data beyond the prices, sizes, market center identifications of the 
NBBO and consolidated last sale information are not required to 
receive (and pay for) such data. The Commission also believes that 
efficiency is promoted when broker-dealers may choose to receive 
(and pay for) additional market data based on their own internal 
analysis of the need for such data.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 
FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).

By removing ``unnecessary regulatory restrictions'' on the ability of 
exchanges to sell their own data, Regulation NMS advanced the goals of 
the Act and the principles reflected in its legislative history. If the 
free market should determine whether, proprietary data is sold to 
broker-dealers at all, it follows that the price at which such data is 
sold should be set by the market as well.
    NASDAQ's ability to price its Last Sale Data Products is 
constrained by (1) competition between exchanges and other trading 
platforms that compete with each other in a variety of dimensions; (2) 
the existence of inexpensive real-time consolidated data and free 
delayed consolidated data, and (3) the inherent contestability of the 
market for proprietary last sale data.
    The market for proprietary last sale data products is currently 
competitive and inherently contestable because there is fierce 
competition for the inputs necessary to the creation of proprietary 
data and strict pricing discipline for the proprietary products 
themselves. Numerous exchanges compete with each other for listings, 
trades, and market data itself, providing virtually limitless 
opportunities for entrepreneurs who wish to produce and distribute 
their own market data. This proprietary data is produced by each 
individual exchange, as well as other entities, in a vigorously 
competitive market.
    Broker-dealers currently have numerous alternative venues for their 
order flow, including eleven self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') 
markets, as well as broker-dealers (``BDs'') and aggregators such as 
the DirectEdge electronic communications network (``ECN''). Each SRO 
market competes to produce transaction reports via trade executions, 
and an ever-increasing number of FINRA-regulated Trade Reporting 
Facilities (``TRFs'') compete to attract internalized transaction 
reports. It is common for BDs to further and exploit this competition 
by sending their order flow and transaction reports to multiple 
markets, rather than providing them all to a single market. Competitive 
markets for order flow, executions, and transaction reports provide 
pricing discipline for the inputs of proprietary data products.
    The large number of SROs, TRFs, and ECNs that currently produce 
proprietary data or are currently capable of producing it provides 
further pricing discipline for proprietary data products. Each SRO, 
TRF, ECN and BD is currently permitted to produce proprietary data 
products, and many currently do or have announced plans to do so, 
including NASDAQ, NYSE, Amex, NYSEArca, and BATS.
    Any ECN or BD can combine with any other ECN, broker-dealer, or 
multiple ECNs or BDs to produce jointly proprietary data products. 
Additionally, non-broker-dealers such as order routers like LAVA, as 
well as market data vendors can facilitate single or multiple broker-
dealers' production of proprietary data products. The potential sources 
of proprietary products are virtually limitless.
    The fact that proprietary data from ECNs, BDs, and vendors can by-
pass SROs is significant in two respects. First, non-SROs can compete 
directly with SROs for the production and sale of proprietary data 
products, as BATS and Arca did before registering as exchanges by 
publishing proprietary book data on the Internet. Second, because a 
single order or transaction report can appear in an SRO proprietary 
product, a non-SRO proprietary product, or both, the data available in 
proprietary products is exponentially greater than the actual number of 
orders and transaction reports that exist in the marketplace writ 
large.
    Consolidated data provides two additional measures of pricing 
discipline for proprietary data products that are a subset of the 
consolidated data stream. First, the consolidated data is

[[Page 15535]]

widely available in real-time at $1 per month for non-professional 
users. Second, consolidated data is also available at no cost with a 
15- or 20- minute delay. Because consolidated data contains marketwide 
information, it effectively places a cap on the fees assessed for 
proprietary data (such as last sale data) that is simply a subset of 
the consolidated data. The mere availability of low-cost or free 
consolidated data provides a powerful form of pricing discipline for 
proprietary data products that contain data elements that are a subset 
of the consolidated data, by highlighting the optional nature of 
proprietary products.
    Market data vendors provide another form of price discipline for 
proprietary data products because they control the primary means of 
access to end users. Vendors impose price restraints based upon their 
business models. For example, vendors such as Bloomberg and Reuters 
that assess a surcharge on data they sell may refuse to offer 
proprietary products that end users will not purchase in sufficient 
numbers. Internet portals, such as Google, impose a discipline by 
providing only that data which will enable them to attract ``eyeballs'' 
that contribute to their advertising revenue. Retail broker-dealers, 
such as Schwab and Fidelity, offer their customers proprietary data 
only if it promotes trading and generates sufficient commission 
revenue. Although the business models may differ, these vendors' 
pricing discipline is the same: They can simply refuse to purchase any 
proprietary data product that fails to provide sufficient value. NASDAQ 
and other producers of proprietary data products must understand and 
respond to these varying business models and pricing disciplines in 
order to successfully market proprietary data products.
    In addition to the competition and price discipline described 
above, the market for proprietary data products is also highly 
contestable because market entry is rapid, inexpensive, and profitable. 
The history of electronic trading is replete with examples of entrants 
that swiftly grew into some of the largest electronic trading platforms 
and proprietary data producers: Archipelago, Bloomberg Tradebook, 
Island, RediBook, Attain, TracECN, and BATS Trading. Today, BATS 
publishes its data at no charge on its Web site in order to attract 
order flow, and it uses market data revenue rebates from the resulting 
executions to maintain low execution charges for its users. Several 
ECNs have existed profitably for many years with a minimal share of 
trading, including Bloomberg Tradebook and NexTrade.
    Regulation NMS, by deregulating the market for proprietary data, 
has increased the contestability of that market. While broker-dealers 
have previously published their proprietary data individually, 
Regulation NMS encourages market data vendors and broker-dealers to 
produce proprietary products cooperatively in a manner never before 
possible. Multiple market data vendors already have the capability to 
aggregate data and disseminate it on a profitable scale, including 
Bloomberg, Reuters and Thomson. New entrants are already on the 
horizon, including ``Project BOAT,'' a consortium of financial 
institutions that is assembling a cooperative trade collection facility 
in Europe. These institutions are active in the United States and could 
rapidly and profitably export the Project Boat technology to exploit 
the opportunities offered by Regulation NMS.
    In establishing the price for the NASDAQ Last Sale Products, NASDAQ 
considered the competitiveness of the market for last sale data and all 
of the implications of that competition. NASDAQ believes that it has 
considered all relevant factors and has not considered irrelevant 
factors in order to establish a fair, reasonable, and not unreasonably 
discriminatory fee and an equitable allocation of fees among all users.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASDAQ does not believe that the proposed rule change will result 
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. To the contrary, 
the NASDAQ Last Sale Products respond to and enhance competition that 
already exists in the market.
    On May 28, 2008, the internet portal Yahoo! announced that it would 
offer its Web site viewers real-time last sale data provided by BATS 
Trading. NASDAQ's last sale data products would compete directly with 
the BATS product disseminated via Yahoo!. Since that time, BATS has 
attracted additional purchasers of its last sale product that is free 
of charge or, at least, has not been the subject of a proposed rule 
change. [sic]
    In addition, as set forth above, the market for last sale data is 
already competitive, with both real-time and delayed consolidated data 
as well as the ability for innumerable entities begin rapidly and 
inexpensively to offer competitive last sale data products. Moreover, 
the New York Stock Exchange distributes competing last sale data 
products and has reduced the price of its product. Under the 
deregulatory regime of Regulation NMS, there is no limit to the number 
of competing products that can be developed quickly and at low cost. 
The Commission should not stand in the way of enhanced competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Three comment letters were filed regarding the proposed rule change 
as originally published for comment. NASDAQ responded to these comments 
in a letter dated December 13, 2007. Both the comment letters and 
NASDAQ's response are available on the SEC Web site at http://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2006-060/nasdaq2006060.shtml.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
    <bullet> Send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a585f464f07494547474f445e596a594f49044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ae8eff6ffb7f9f5f7f7fff4eee9dae9fff9b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include 
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-027 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-027. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. 
To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the

[[Page 15536]]

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official business 
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also 
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of 
the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the 
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NASDAQ-2009-027 and should be submitted on or before April 27, 2009.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a 
Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change, to extend the 
pilot program for three months, is consistent with the requirements of 
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a 
national securities exchange.\7\ In particular, it is consistent with 
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ which requires that the rules of a 
national securities exchange provide for the equitable allocation of 
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers 
and other parties using its facilities, and Section 6(b)(5) of the 
Act,\9\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a 
national securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism 
of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, 
to protect investors and the public interest, and not be designed to 
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or 
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has 
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, 
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also finds that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the provisions of Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\10\ which 
requires that the rules of an exchange not impose any burden on 
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes 
of the Act. Finally, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change 
is consistent with Rule 603(a) of Regulation NMS,\11\ adopted under 
Section 11A(c)(1) of the Act, which requires an exclusive processor 
that distributes information with respect to quotations for or 
transactions in an NMS stock to do so on terms that are fair and 
reasonable and that are not unreasonably discriminatory.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \11\ 17 CFR 242.603(a).
    \12\ NASDAQ is an exclusive processor of its last sale data 
under Section 3(a)(22)(B) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(22)(B), which 
defines an exclusive processor as, among other things, an exchange 
that distributes data on an exclusive basis on its own behalf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission approved the fee for the NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds 
for a pilot period which runs until March 31, 2009.\13\ The Commission 
notes that the Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program for three 
months. The Commission did not receive any comments on the previous 
extensions of the pilot program.\14\ In addition, the Exchange proposes 
to reduce the fee cap applicable to the NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds 
from $100,000 per month for NASDAQ Last Sale for NASDAQ and $50,000 per 
month for NASDAQ Last Sale for NYSE/Amex to $50,000 per month total for 
both feeds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 57965 (June 16, 
2008), 73 FR 35178 (June 20, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2006-060); 58894 
(October 31, 2008), 73 FR 66953 (November 12, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-
086); and 59186 (December 30, 2008), 74 FR 743 (January 7, 2009) 
(SR-NASDAQ-2008-103).
    \14\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 2, 2008, the Commission issued an approval order 
(``Order'') that sets forth a market-based approach for analyzing 
proposals by self-regulatory organizations to impose fees for ``non-
core'' market data products, such as the NASDAQ Last Sale Data 
Feeds.\15\ The Commission believes that Nasdaq's proposal to 
temporarily extend the pilot program is consistent with the Act for the 
reasons noted in the Order.\16\ The Commission believes that approving 
NASDAQ's proposal to temporarily extend the pilot program that imposes 
a fee for the NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds for an additional three 
months and to reduce the cap applicable to the NASDAQ Last Sale Data 
Feeds will be beneficial to investors and in the public interest, in 
that it is intended to allow continued broad public dissemination of 
increased real-time pricing information. The Commission notes that 
price competition provided by other market data products were 
considered by the Exchange in determining to reduce the fee cap for the 
NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds. In addition, extending the pilot program 
for an additional three months will allow NASDAQ, consistent with its 
representation,\17\ to file within 30 days, the public to comment on, 
and the Commission to analyze consistent with the Order and in light of 
Section 19(b) of the Act, a proposal to permanently approve the fee for 
NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770 (December 9, 2008) (Order Setting Aside Action by 
Delegated Authority and Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to 
NYSE Arca Data).
    \16\ See supra note 13.
    \17\ See supra note 3.
    \18\ The Exchange has represented that it will file a proposed 
rule change within thirty days of filing of this proposal seeking 
permanent approval of the NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds pilot program. 
See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule 
change before the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice 
of filing thereof in the Federal Register. Accelerating approval of 
this proposal is expected to benefit investors by continuing to 
facilitate their access to widespread, free, real-time pricing 
information contained in the NASDAQ Last Sale Data Feeds. In addition, 
the Commission notes that the proposal should benefit vendors that make 
real-time pricing information available by potentially reducing their 
monthly fees. Therefore, the Commission finds good cause, consistent 
with Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\19\ to approve the proposed rule 
change on an accelerated basis to extend the operation of the pilot 
until June 30, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2009-027) is hereby approved 
on an accelerated basis until June 30, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-7586 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>