alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
___________

No. 95-3533

___________

Teamsters National Freight *

Industry Negotiating Committee, *

on behalf of Teamster Local *

Union Nos. 116, 120, 123, 346, *

and 544, and on behalf of all *

Teamster represented employees *

of Midwest Motor Express, Inc., *

 *

Plaintiff-Appellee, * Order Remanding For

 * Statement of Reasons

v. * Supporting Denial of 

 * Rule 11 Sanctions.

MME, Inc.; Midwest Motor Express,*

Inc.; Midnite Express, Inc.; John*

T. Roswick; Richard N. Roswick; *

W. J. Greenstein; Raymond J. *

Patton; James F. Greenstein; *

Lambert L. Glatt; Jodi L. Kary; *

Daniel Zeller; E. J. Roswick; *

Nels Roswick; John H. Roswick; *

Marlin Kling, *

 *

Defendants-Appellants. *

___________

 Submitted: October 22, 1996

 Filed: November 8, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, HEANEY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Midwest Motor Express and the other defendants appeal the district

court's refusal to grant their motion for Rule 11 sanctions against the

plaintiff. In this case, the plaintiff alleged claims of RICO violations,

fraud, and embezzlement against the defendants. The district court granted

the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of a factual basis

to support the
-2-

allegations made, and for a failure to allege the essential elements of a

RICO case based on mail and wire fraud in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P.

9(b). The district court, however, denied the defendants' motion for Rule

11 sanctions without stating fully its reasons for the denial. The

plaintiff has not appealed from the dismissal. 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dictates that the

imposition of sanctions upon a determination that Rule 11 has been violated

is discretionary with the district court. We review all aspects of a

district court's Rule 11 determination for an abuse of discretion. Cooter

& Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 405 (1990). We cannot meaningfully

review the district court's exercise of discretion, however, absent the

benefit of a full statement of reasons explaining why the district court

denied the motion for sanctions. 

Accordingly, we retain jurisdiction of this case but remand it to the

district court for the limited purpose of requesting the district court to

articulate the reasons supporting its exercise of discretion to deny the

defendants' motion for Rule 11 sanctions. The district court's statement

of reasons shall be certified to this court within 45 days. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         106,429
<SECURITIES>                                     1,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,441
<PP&E>                                       3,943,835
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,472,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,616,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,609,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,616,479
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,487
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                115,032
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            115,032
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.22
        

</TABLE>
Waadew AYSISAYH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-739

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Bart A. HOUSTON, Appellant, v. Elizabeth A. HOUSTON, Appellee.

No. 4D17-185

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 14, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          70,274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,963
<PP&E>                                         274,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,125
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           534
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,863
<SALES>                                        288,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,354
<CGS>                                          157,056
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  234,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
        

</TABLE>
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60704

Summary Calendar

__________________

BRYAN WASHINGTON; JAMES

M. LYLE, IV,

 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

JOE PRICE, Sheriff; RICK GASTON,

Capt.; JIMMY JOHNSON, Captain; 

CRAIN, Dr.; JACKIE NEELY, Nurse;

DIANE ELLINGTON,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:95CV26RR

- - - - - - - - - -

July 24, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James M. Lyle, IV, Mississippi state prisoner #84998,

appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to

the defendants in Lyle's civil rights suit. Lyle's notice of

appeal was purportedly filed on behalf of both Lyle and Bryan

Washington. Because Washington did not sign the notice of

appeal, however, the notice is not effective as to Washington. 
No. 95-60704

-2-

See Carter v. Stalder, 60 F.3d 238, 239 (5th Cir. 1995). The

appeal is therefore DISMISSED as to Washington for lack of

appellate jurisdiction.

Lyle argues that the district court erred by granting the

defendants' motion for summary judgment without first conducting

an evidentiary hearing, that the district court failed to

consider Lyle's brief in opposition to the motion for summary

judgment, and that the district court erred by adopting verbatim

the defendants' brief in support of their motion for summary

judgment as its own memorandum order. The district court was not

required to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the defendants'

summary-judgment motion. See Daniels v. Morris, 746 F.2d 271,

274-75 (5th Cir. 1984). Further, Lyle has failed to demonstrate

that the affidavits filed by him in response to the motion for

summary judgment were not received and considered by the district

court. Finally, Lyle has offered this court no support for his

assertion that the district court is prohibited from adopting the

legal analysis and reasoning set forth in a brief submitted in

support of a summary-judgment motion as its own memorandum order. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Jonathan Joseph TURNBULL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3405

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1








LAKE & ASSOCIATES, CPA’s LLC





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the use, in the report on Form 10-K of Darshan Equity Investment, Inc. (A Development Stage Company), of our report dated March 23, 2011 on our audit of the financial statements of Darshan Equity Investment, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010, and the related statement of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows from inception on May 26, 2009 through December 31, 2009, the year ended December 31, 2010 and cumulative from  inception on May 26, 2009 through December 31, 2010 and the reference to us under the caption “Experts.”







/s/Lake & Associates, CPA’s LLC


Lake & Associates, CPA’s LLC


Schaumburg, Illinois


March 25, 2011
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

36 37 38 39 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
GMAC Mortgage

March 10, 2005

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
ATTN: TRUST ADMINISTRATION-NC040A
1761 EAST ST. ANDREW PLACE
SANTA ANA, CA 92705-4934

Re: Annual Officers Statement of Compliance
      Year Ending 2004
      GMACM Investor Agreement # 41122/New Century Home Equity Loan
      Trust Series 2004-A Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates

I, Michael Kacergis, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed Manager of
GMAC Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer"), and further certify as follows:

1. This certification is being made in pursuant to the terms of the Pooling
and Servicing, dated as of July 1, 2004, the ("Agreement"), among New Century
Mortgage Securities, Inc., as depositor, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
and GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as servicers, Federal National Mortgage
Association as guarantor with respect to the Group I Class A Certificates
and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.
2. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the preceding year
and the Servicer's performance under the Agreement and to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review: the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement throughout the year.
3. If applicable, GMACM has filed the information returns with respect to
the receipt of mortgage interest pursuant to Sections 6050H, 6050J, 6050P of
the Code, received in a trade or business, reports of foreclosures and
abandonment's of any Mortgaged Property and the information returns relating
to cancellation of indebtedness income with respect to any Mortgage Property.
4. All hazard, flood FHA mortgage insurance and primary mortgage insurance
premiums, taxes, ground rents, assessments and other lienable items have been
paid in connection with the mortgaged properties.
5. All property inspections have been completed as required.
6. Compliance relative to Adjustable Rate Mortgages has been met.
7. Fidelity Bond and Errors and Omissions Insurance coverage is current, in
full force and effect.

Servicer: GMAC Mortgage Corporation

By: /s/: Michael Kacergis

Name: Michael Kacergis

Title: Manager, Contract Administration
       National Loan Administration Risk and Compliance

GMAC Mortgage Corporation
500 Enterprise Road
Horsham, PA 19044
# Iris Oifigiúil C 34I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 034I |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 641 Feabhra 2021 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 034I

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

641 Feabhra 2021

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Fógairtí |
| | NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN |
| | An Banc Eorpach Infheistíochta |
| 2021/C 34 I/01 | CNS 2021 - Glao ar thograí — Smaointe lena n-athraítear an saol mór: Comórtas Nuálaíochta Sóisialta Institiúid an BEI, 2021 | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

V   Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

An Banc Eorpach Infheistíochta

2021/C 34 I/01

CNS 2021 - Glao ar thograí — Smaointe lena n-athraítear an saol mór: Comórtas Nuálaíochta Sóisialta Institiúid an BEI, 2021

1

---

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

V Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

An Banc Eorpach Infheistíochta

| 1.2.2021 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | CI 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

CI 34/1

---

CNS 2021 - Glao ar thograí

Smaointe lena n-athraítear an saol mór: Comórtas Nuálaíochta Sóisialta Institiúid an BEI, 2021

(2021/C 34 I/01)

An deichiú Comórtas Nuálaíochta Sóisialta eagraithe ag Institiúid an BEI

Cuireann an Comórtas Nuálaíochta Sóisialta (CNS) smaointe nuálacha chun cinn agus tugann luach a saothair do thionscnaimh a mbeidh tionchar sóisialta agus comhshaoil acu. Baineann na tionscadail le neart réimsí éagsúla – idir oideachas, chúram sláinte agus chruthú post, mar aon le teicneolaíochtaí, córais agus próisis nua. Beidh gach tionscadal san iomaíocht do dhá dhuais sa Chatagóir Ghinearálta, agus beidh na tionscadail siúd a dhéanann plé le hábhar na bliana, is é sin maireachtáil inbhuanaithe, san iomaíocht freisin do dhá dhuais sa Chatagóir Speisialta. Lena cheiliúradh go bhfuil CNS ar an bhfód 10 mbliana anois, beidh duais EUR 75 000 le bronnadh ar an tionscadal sa chéad áit agus EUR 30 000 ar an tionscadal sa dara háit. Beidh duais EUR 10 000 le bronnadh ar Rogha an Phobail, leis.

Lean ar Facebook muid: www.facebook.com/EibInstitute

Le tuilleadh eolais a fháil faoin gcomórtas seo agus cén chaoi togra nuálach a chur isteach, téigh chuig: http://institute.eib.org/programmes/social/social-innovation-tournament/

---
Pedro RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1185

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-122664)    pertaining to the 2001 and 2005 Equity Incentive Plans and 2005    Employee Stock Purchase Plan of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc. of    our reports dated February 23, 2007 with respect to the    consolidated financial statements of optionsXpress Holdings,    Inc., optionsXpress Holdings, Inc. management’s assessment    of the effectiveness of internal control over financial    reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over    financial reporting of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc., included in    this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2006; and our report    included in the following paragraph with respect to the    financial statement schedule of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc.     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of    optionsXpress Holdings, Inc. listed in Item 15(a). This    schedule is the responsibility of optionsXpress Holdings,    Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an    opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, as to which the date    is February 23, 2007, the financial statement schedule    referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic    financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all    material respects the information set forth therein. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP     Chicago, Illinois    March 1, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15505-15506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, 
as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Inspectorate America Corporation, 4717 Santa Elena, Corpus 
Christi, TX 78405, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test 
petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils 
for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 
151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to 
conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and 
receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or 
approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries 
regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited 
or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aac9c8da84c6cbc8c2dbeacec2d984cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="244746540a4845464c5564404c570a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories: 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on 
May 07, 2008. The

[[Page 15506]]

next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Breaux, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: March 10, 2009.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E9-7616 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Euroopa Liidu C 32I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 032I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 64. aastakäik29. jaanuar 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 032I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

64. aastakäik29. jaanuar 2021

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2021/C 32 I/01 | Ravimite müügilubasid käsitlevate Euroopa Liidu otsuste kokkuvõte 29. jaanuaril 2021(Avaldatud vastavalt Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 726/2004 artiklile 13 või 38) | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2021/C 32 I/01

Ravimite müügilubasid käsitlevate Euroopa Liidu otsuste kokkuvõte 29. jaanuaril 2021(Avaldatud vastavalt Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 726/2004 artiklile 13 või 38)

(Avaldatud vastavalt Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 726/2004 artiklile 13 või 38)

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 29.1.2021 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 32/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2021

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 32/1

---

Ravimite müügilubasid käsitlevate Euroopa Liidu otsuste kokkuvõte 29. jaanuaril 2021

(Avaldatud vastavalt Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 726/2004 artiklile 13 või 38 (1))

(2021/C 32 I/01)

| — | Müügiloa väljaandmine (Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 726/2004 artikkel 13): Heaks kiidetud













  Otsuse tegemise kuupäev | Ravimi nimetus | Rahvusvaheline mittekaubanduslik nimetus (INN) | Müügiloa omanik | Kande number ühenduse registris | Ravimivorm | ATC-kood (anatoomilis-terapeutiline keemiline kood) | Teatamise kuupäev |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 29.1.2021 | COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca | COVID-19 vaktsiin (ChAdOx1-S [rekombinantne]) | AstraZeneca AB |
| 151 85 Södertälje, Sverige |

—

Müügiloa väljaandmine (Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 726/2004 artikkel 13): Heaks kiidetud

Otsuse tegemise kuupäev

Ravimi nimetus

Rahvusvaheline mittekaubanduslik nimetus (INN)

Müügiloa omanik

Kande number ühenduse registris

Ravimivorm

ATC-kood (anatoomilis-terapeutiline keemiline kood)

Teatamise kuupäev

29.1.2021

COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca

COVID-19 vaktsiin (ChAdOx1-S [rekombinantne])

AstraZeneca AB

151 85 Södertälje, Sverige

EU/1/21/1529

Süstesuspensioon

J07BX03

29.1.2021

Kõnealuseid ravimeid käsitleva avaliku hindamisaruandega ja vastavate otsustega tutvuda soovijatel palutakse pöörduda:

| European Medicines Agency |
| --- |
| Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 |
| 1083 HS Amsterdam |
| NETHERLANDS |

European Medicines Agency

Domenico Scarlattilaan 6

1083 HS Amsterdam

NETHERLANDS

---

(1)  ELT L 136, 30.4.2004, lk 1.

---
Lee E. DAVIS, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Hilton Worldwide Inc., Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D16-5319

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1 

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of THL Credit, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Flynn, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

|  /s/     CHRISTOPHER J. FLYNN |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:   Christopher J. Flynn                 |
| Title:     Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:     March 6, 2018       |