alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
James Leonard BUTLER Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-2994

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 4.23









|Ref.: 3391               |                  
|------------------------ | -----------------
|                         |                  
|                         | December 31, 2012
|                         |                  
|Eagleford Energy Inc.    |                  
|1505, 1 King Street West |                  
|Toronto, ON  M5H 1A1     |                  



| | Re: | Eagleford Energy Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------

| |  | Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Year Ended August 31, 2012
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



Dear Sirs:



We refer to our reports entitled “Evaluation
of the P&NG Reserves of Eagleford Energy Inc. (as of August 31, 2012)” dated October 11, 2012, “Evaluation of the
P&NG Reserves of Eagleford Energy Inc. (as of August 31, 2011)” dated October 7, 2011, and “Evaluation of the P&NG
Reserves of Eagleford Energy Inc. (as of August 31, 2010)” dated November 30, 2010 (collectively referred to as “the
Reports”).



We confirm that we have read Eagleford
Energy Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2012 (the “Form 20-F”) and have no reason
to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained in the Form 20-F that are derived from the Report
or that are within our knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with our Report.



We hereby consent to the use of our name
and references to excerpts from the Reports both in the Form 20-F and through incorporation by reference in the Form 20-F.



| | Sincerely,                      
| | --------------------------------
| |                                 
| | SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED      
| |                                 
| | /s/  Attila A. Szabo, P.Eng.    
| |                                 
| | Attila A. Szabo, P.Eng.         
| | Manager, Engineering and Partner



AAS:smr

W:\3391\Consent\AAS 12 31 2012.doc
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40314

Summary Calendar

 

MARIO MORENO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

DALE H. BROWN, Warden, FCI, Beaumont (Low),

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CV-499

- - - - - - - - - -

May 14, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mario Moreno, federal prisoner # 60630-079, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a

writ of habeas corpus. Moreno’s motion to take judicial notice

and to supplement the record is DENIED. 

Moreno argues that he was entitled to credit on his federal

sentence for time served in state jail prior to his delivery to

federal authorities and that he should have received an

evidentiary hearing in the district court. Because Moreno

received credit for the relevant jail time on a Texas state 
No. 98-40314

-2-

sentence, he is not entitled to credit on his federal sentence. 

See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (West 1998); see United States v.

Dovalina, 711 F.2d 737, 740 (5th Cir. 1983). Moreno has not

demonstrated that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his

claims.

DENY MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE

RECORD DENIED; AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hugo COLLAZOS-MUNOZ, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hugo Collazos-Munoz, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hugo Collazos-Munoz, Defendant—Appellant.

Nos. 03-30437, 03-30438, 03-30439.

D.C. No. CR-00-00054-1-RHW, CR-00-00058-1-RHW, CR-00-00105-1-RHW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 12, 2004.

*137Earl Allan Hicks, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Hugo Collazos-Munoz, Petersburg, VA, pro se.

Before CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Hugo Collazos-Munoz appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his “Motion for Retention of Trial Documents from Defense Counsel” from his three underlying convictions for conspiracy to receive and pass counterfeit currency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 472 and 473, conspiracy to import over five kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963, importation of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not err in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over Collazos-Munoz’s motion, because there was no case pending before the court at the time Collazos-Munoz filed his motion. The district court correctly stated that it would not have jurisdiction to rule on CollazosMunoz’s discovery request unless and until Collazos-Munoz filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *See Calderon v. United States Dist. Court for the Northern Dist. of Cal,*98 F.3d 1102, 1106-07 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court clearly erred in granting discovery request before inmate had filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
US QUALITY HOMES, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3532

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 09, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sherry SMITH, Personal Representative of the Estate of Julius B. Smith, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2018

Charles R.A. Morse, of Jones Day, New York, NY, Jason T. Burnette, of Jones Day, Atlanta, GA, Troy A. Fuhrman, and Marie Attaway Borland, of Hill Ward Henderson, Tampa, and Donald B. Ayer, of Jones Day, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

David J. Sales, and Daniel R. Hoffman, of David J. Sales, PA, Jupiter, and William J. Wichmann, of William J. Wichmann, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See**Schoeff v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.* , 232 So.3d 294 (Fla. 2017) ; *R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta* , 214 So.3d 590 (Fla. 2017) ; *R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ciccone* , 190 So.3d 1028 (Fla. 2016) ; *Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas* , 110 So.3d 419 (Fla. 2013) ; *Wald v. Grainger* , 64 So.3d 1201 (Fla. 2011).

EVANDER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          69,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     48,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,286
<PP&E>                                         213,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,443
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           529
<OTHER-SE>                                     234,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,425
<SALES>                                        233,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               233,274
<CGS>                                          117,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.3

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of THL Credit, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terrence W. Olson, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/     TERRENCE W. OLSON         
|Name:   Terrence W. Olson         
|Title:     Chief Financial Officer
|Date:     March 10, 2016
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                        CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION
                                  EXHIBIT 12
               BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION


                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED    SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                     DECEMBER 31, 1997   DECEMBER 31, 1997
                                     -----------------  -------------------
                                               FULLY                FULLY
                                      BASIC   DILUTED    BASIC     DILUTED
                                     -------  --------  --------  ---------
<S>                                  <C>      <C>       <C>       <C>
Average outstanding shares: . . . .   47,021    47,021   46,599     46,599 
Primary options outstanding . . . .        -         -        -          - 
Fully diluted options outstanding .        -     1,079        -        765 
                                     -------  --------  --------  ---------
Equivalent Shares . . . . . . . . .   47,021    48,100   46,599     47,364 
                                     =======  ========  ========  =========

Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $ 1,423  $  1,423  $ 2,723   $  2,723 
Preferred stock dividends
  and accretion of preferred shares        -         -      (18)       (18)
                                     -------  --------  --------  ---------
Net income available to common
  stockholders. . . . . . . . . . .  $ 1,423  $  1,423  $ 2,705   $  2,705 
                                     =======  ========  ========  =========
Earnings per share. . . . . . . . .  $  0.03  $   0.03  $  0.06   $   0.06 
                                     =======  ========  ========  =========

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13432-13433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8787-1]


Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122 (h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement concerning the Great Lakes Chemical 
Corporation Emergency Response Superfund Site, El Dorado, Arkansas.
    The settlement requires the one (1) settling party to pay a total 
of $45,000.00 as payment of response costs to the Hazardous Substances 
Superfund. The total response costs incurred by EPA, as of January 31, 
2008, were $63,870.49. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue 
pursuant to Section 107 of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9607.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this 
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 27, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background 
information relating to the settlement are available for public 
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained from Courtney Kudla, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Ste. 1200 (SF-TE), Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 
665-8008. Comments should reference the Great Lakes Chemical 
Corporation Emergency Response Superfund Site, El Dorado, Arkansas, and 
EPA Docket Number 06-02-09, and should be addressed to Courtney Kudla 
at the address listed above.

[[Page 13433]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Foster, 1445 Ross Avenue, Ste. 
1200 (RC-S) Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-2169.

    Dated: March 13, 2009.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E9-6881 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6069

CHRISTOPHER GANN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN J. ANDREWS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00204-TSE-TCB)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 23, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Gann, Appellant Pro Se. Meghan Elizabeth Loftus, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Gann, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting 

Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Gann’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Gann v. Andrews, No. 1:20-cv-00204-TSE-TCB (E.D. 

Va. Nov. 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles A. WOODS, Appellant.

No. 03-2886.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 10, 2004.

Decided May 5, 2004.

David M. Ketehmark, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Charles A. Woods, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Lance M. Haley, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kansas City, Missouri, police officers arrested Charles Woods after discovering ammunition on Woods’ person and a loaded firearm between the seats of the truck he was driving. Following a bench trial, the district court1 found Woods guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition and also convicted him of possessing a firearm with an obliterated *684serial number. Woods appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence2 on the ground that the traffic stop and ensuing vehicle search were illegal. We review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and consider its legal determinations de novo. *See United States v. Stephens,*350 F.3d 778, 779 (8th Cir.2003). Having reviewed the record, including Woods’ supplemental *pro se*filings, we affirm.

The district court was entitled to believe the officers’ account of the events leading to Woods’ arrest over the account proffered by Woods, *see United States v. Syslo,*303 F.3d 860, 866 (8th Cir.2002) (deference to credibility determinations), and the court’s factual findings are a permissible view of the hearing testimony. The missing front license plate on Woods’ vehicle constituted a traffic violation that provided probable cause to stop Woods, *see United States v. Bloomfield,*40 F.3d 910, 915 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), and Woods subsequently consented to a search. Even if, as Woods contends, he neither mentioned that he had a firearm nor consented to a search, the search was still permissible. Woods fit the description of a suspect in a series of burglaries in the area, and his suspicious behavior upon exiting the truck- — -initially failing to comply with the officer’s requests, pacing around, placing his hands in and out of his pockets — coupled with the bullets that one of the officers felt in his pocket, provided sufficient justification to search the truck’s passenger compartment for weapons. *See Michigan v. Long,*463 U.S. 1032, 1049, 103 S.Ct. 3469, 77 L.Ed.2d 1201 (1983); *United States v. Patterson,*140 F.3d 767, 771, 773 (8th Cir.1998); *United States v. Cummins,*920 F.2d 498, 502 (8th Cir.1990).

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

2

. Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Sarah W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
# Официален вестник C 34I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 034I |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 641 февруари 2021 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 034I

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 641 февруари 2021 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Становища |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Европейска инвестиционна банка |
| 2021/C 34 I/01 | ТСИ 2021 — Покана за предложения — Идеи за промяна на света: Турнирът на ЕИБ за социални иновации за 2021 г. | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

V   Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейска инвестиционна банка

2021/C 34 I/01

ТСИ 2021 — Покана за предложения — Идеи за промяна на света: Турнирът на ЕИБ за социални иновации за 2021 г.

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

V Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейска инвестиционна банка

| 1.2.2021 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CI 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CI 34/1

---

ТСИ 2021 — Покана за предложения

Идеи за промяна на света: Турнирът на ЕИБ за социални иновации за 2021 г.

(2021/C 34 I/01)

Институтът на ЕИБ провежда десетото издание на Турнира за социални иновации

ТСИ насърчава разработването на новаторски идеи и отличава инициативи за социално и екологично въздействие в широк кръг от области – от образование, здравеопазване и създаване на работни места, до нови технологии, системи и процеси. Всички проекти се състезават за две награди в общата категория, а проектите по тазгодишната тема — устойчив начин на живот, ще се състезават и за две награди в специалната категория. За отбелязване на десетата годишнина от създаването на ТСИ, отличените проекти и в двете категории ще получат първа или втора награда, съответно в размер от 75 000 или 30 000 евро, а наградата за избор на публиката ще бъде 10 000 евро.

Следвайте ни на Facebook: www.facebook.com/EibInstitute

За допълнителна информация за турнира и за начина на подаване на иновативно предложение вижте: http://institute.eib.org/programmes/social/social-innovation-tournament/

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Encore Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gareth West, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Alex McKean, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 13, 2011
/s/ Gareth WestGareth West

Chief Executive OfficerDate: January 13, 2011
/s/ Alex McKeanAlex McKean

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Thomas R. JAMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1169

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

Thomas R. James, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* *State v. Harris*, 129 So.3d 1166, 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ("Harris first argued in his 3.800(a) motion that the sentence for count 5 was illegal because the trial court did not orally pronounce the sentence.... [T]he record reflects that Harris completed these sentences. This issue is thus moot."); *see also* *Miller v. State*, 996 So.2d 954, 954 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) ("Christopher Miller seeks review of a trial court order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Appellant's sentence for grand theft has expired, his case is hereby dismissed as moot.").