1240 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 10, 2018 / Notices 

1See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 42285 

(September 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Petitioners’ Case Brief, ‘‘Re: Certain Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from Turkey: Case Brief,’’ 

dated October 10, 2017 (the petitioners’ case brief); 

and Toscelik’s Rebuttal Brief, ‘‘Re: Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from Turkey; Toscelik rebuttal 

brief,’’ submitted on October 16, 2017 (Toscelik’s 

rebuttal brief). Note that Toscelik’s rebuttal brief 

was timely filed but dated incorrectly with an 

August 9, 2016, date. 

not qualify for a separate rate, we will 

instruct CBP to assess dumping duties 

on the companies’ entries of subject 

merchandise at the rate of 92.84 percent. 

For Zhejiang Jingli, because 

Commerce rescinded the NSR, we will 

instruct CBP to assess dumping duties 

on the company’s entries of subject 

merchandise at the rate China-wide rate 

of 92.84 percent. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review (except, 

if the rate is de minimis, then a cash 

deposit rate of zero will be established 

for that company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed China and nonChina exporters not listed above that 

currently have a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where the exporter received 

that separate rate; (3) for all China 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate for the China-wide entity, 

92.84 percent; and (4) for all non-China 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the China exporter 

that supplied that non-China exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notifications to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notifications to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of review in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: January 2, 2018. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Zhaofeng’s Unreported U.S. 

Sales 

Comment 2: Other Issues for Zhaofeng 

Comment 3: Rejection of Yantai CMC’s 

Separate Rates Application 

Comment 4: Legal Authority To Assign a 

China-Wide Rate 

Comment 5: Whether the China-Wide Rate 

is Under Review 

5. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2018–00242 Filed 1–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–816] 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

From Turkey: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 7, 2017, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of antidumping 

duty order on certain oil country tubular 

goods (OCTG) from Turkey. Based on 

our analysis of the comments received, 

we find that subject merchandise has 

been sold at less than normal value. 

DATES: Applicable January 10, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3477 or (202) 482–1690, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 7, 2017, we published 

the Preliminary Results of the 

administrative review.1 The period of 

review (POR) for the administrative 

review is September 1, 2015, through 

August 31, 2016. We invited interested 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results and received case and rebuttal 

briefs from interested parties.2

Commerce conducted this review with 

section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

(OCTG). The merchandise subject to the 

order is currently classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) under item 

numbers: 7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20, 

7304.29.10.30, 7304.29.10.40, 

7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60, 

7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10, 

7304.29.20.20, 7304.29.20.30, 

7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50, 

7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80, 

7304.29.31.10, 7304.29.31.20, 

7304.29.31.30, 7304.29.31.40, 

7304.29.31.50, 7304.29.31.60, 

7304.29.31.80, 7304.29.41.10, 

7304.29.41.20, 7304.29.41.30, 

7304.29.41.40, 7304.29.41.50, 

7304.29.41.60, 7304.29.41.80, 

7304.29.50.15, 7304.29.50.30, 

7304.29.50.45, 7304.29.50.60, 

7304.29.50.75, 7304.29.61.15, 

7304.29.61.30, 7304.29.61.45, 

7304.29.61.60, 7304.29.61.75, 

7305.20.20.00, 7305.20.40.00, 

7305.20.60.00, 7305.20.80.00, 

7306.29.10.30, 7306.29.10.90, 

7306.29.20.00, 7306.29.31.00, 

7306.29.41.00, 7306.29.60.10, 

7306.29.60.50, 7306.29.81.10, and 

7306.29.81.50. 

The merchandise subject to the order 

may also enter under the following 

HTSUS item numbers: 7304.39.00.24, 

7304.39.00.28, 7304.39.00.32, 

7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 10, 2018 / Notices 1241 

3A full description of the scope of the order is 

contained in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Certain Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from Turkey,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

4See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

5 Id. at Comment: Duty Drawback. 

6 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

7See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the 

Republic of Turkey: Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final 

Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 79 

FR 41971 (July 18, 2014). 

7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 

7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 

7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 

7304.39.00.72, 7304.39.00.76, 

7304.39.00.80, 7304.59.60.00, 

7304.59.80.15, 7304.59.80.20, 

7304.59.80.25, 7304.59.80.30, 

7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 

7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 

7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 

7304.59.80.65, 7304.59.80.70, 

7304.59.80.80, 7305.31.40.00, 

7305.31.60.90, 7306.30.50.55, 

7306.30.50.90, 7306.50.50.50, and 

7306.50.50.70. 

While the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description is 

dispositive.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties in this review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is made available to the public via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room B8024 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Enforcement and 

Compliance website at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

Appendix to this notice. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on comments received from 

interested parties and further review of 

the record, Commerce capped the dutydrawback adjustment added to U.S. 

price.5 This revision changed the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

results for Tosc ̧elik Profil ve Sac 

Endu ̈ strisi A.S ̧. (Toscelik), the sole 

company subject to this review. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

For the final results of the 

administrative review, we determine 

that the following percentage weightedaverage dumping margin exists for the 

period September 1, 2015, through 

August 31, 2016: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi 

A.S .......................................... 9.13 

Assessment 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. For Toscelik, 

we calculated importer-specific 

assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for each importer’s 

examined sales and the total entered 

value of the sales in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1).6

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Toscelik 

for which it did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate un-reviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. We intend to issue 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of the administrative review for all 

shipments of OCTG from Turkey 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for Toscelik will be 9.13 

percent, the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this 

administrative review but covered in a 

prior completed segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this administrative review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

complete segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 35.86 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the original less-than-fairvalue investigation.7 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

Dated: January 4, 2018. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Duty Drawback 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
1242 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 10, 2018 / Notices 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–00263 Filed 1–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

United States Patent and Trademark 

Office 

National Summer Teacher Institute 

ACTION: Revision of a currently 

approved collection. 

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO), as required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, invites comments on a proposed 

extension of an existing information 

collection. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before March 12, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Email: InformationCollection@

uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0077 

comment’’ in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. 

• Mail: Marcie Lovett, Records and 

Information Governance Division 

Director, Office of the Chief Technology 

Officer, United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, 

Alexandria, VA 22313–1450. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information 

should be directed to Joyce Ward, Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual 

Property, United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, 

Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by 

telephone at 571–272–8424; or by email 

to Joyce.Ward@uspto.gov with ‘‘0651– 

0077 comment’’ in the subject line. 

Additional information about this 

collection is also available at http://

www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information 

Collection Review.’’ 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

Since 2014, the USPTO has sponsored 

a program entitled ‘‘National Summer 

Teacher Institute’’. This program 

accepts applicants for a summer 

teaching workshop. Interested 

individuals are required to submit an 

application requesting to participate in 

the program. In the application, 

applicants are required to certify that 

they are educators with at least 3 years’ 

experience; identify STEM-related fields 

they have taught in the last year; 

identify STEM related fields they plan 

to teach in the upcoming year; and 

acknowledge their commitment to 

incorporate the learnings from the 

Summer Teacher Institute into their 

curriculum, where applicable, and 

cooperate with sharing lessons and 

outcomes with teachers and PTO. 

The USPTO seeks committed 

educators in science fields who will 

learn about innovative strategies to help 

increase student learning and 

achievement in these fields together 

with elements of invention and IP. 

Outside scientists and inventors will 

among the presenters and workshop 

leads. Educators will also participate in 

field trips (i.e. to NASA) and have 

opportunities for networking with other 

educators and invited experts. The 

USPTO may various host webinars in 

conjunction with the Summer Institute. 

USPTO plans to conduct surveys of both 

the Institute and the webinars in order 

to gain useful feedback from program 

participants. 

II. Method of Collection 

Applications and corresponding 

surveys will be submitted electronically 

through the www.uspto.gov/education 

website. 

III. Data 

OMB Number: 0651–0077. 

Form Numbers: NSTI 1–3. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

Previously Existing Information 

Collection. 

Affected Public: Businesses or other 

for-profits; not-for-profit institutions. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

900 responses per year. 

Estimated Time per Response: The 

USPTO estimates that it will take the 

public approximately 5 (0.08 hours) to 

30 minutes (0.5 hours) to submit the 

information in this collection, including 

the time to gather the necessary 

information, prepare the appropriate 

form or document, and submit the 

completed request to the USPTO. 

Estimated Total Annual Respondent 

Burden Hours: 291.67 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Respondent 

(Hourly) Cost Burden: $8,613.02. The 

USPTO expects that secondary school 

teachers will complete the applications 

and surveys. The professional hourly 

rate for secondary school teachers is 

$29.53, based upon the May 2016 

Occupational Labor Statistics Report for 

secondary school teachers (25–2031). 

Using this hourly rate, the USPTO 

estimates that the total respondent cost 

burden for this collection is $8,613.02 

per year. 

Item number 

Estimated time 

for 

response 

(hours) 

Estimated 

annual 

responses 

Estimated annual 

burden hours 

Rate 

($/hr) Total cost 

(a) (b) (a) × (b)/60 = (c) (d) (c) × (d) = (e) 

1. Summer Teacher Institute Application (NSTI 

1) .................................................................... 0.50 500 250 $29.53 $7,382.50 

2. Summer Teacher Institute Participant Survey 

(NSTI 2) .......................................................... 0.17 100 16.67 29.53 492.27 

3. Summer Teacher Institute Webinar Survey 

(NSTI 3) .......................................................... 0.08 300 25 29.53 738.25 

Total ............................................................ ........................ 900 291.67 ........................ $8,613.02 

Estimated Total Annual (Non-hour) 

Respondent Cost Burden: $0. There are 

no capital start-up, maintenance, 

postage, or recordkeeping costs. All 

applications and surveys will be 

received electronically. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Comments are invited on: 

(a) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES