### Name: Title: Company: Sign Date: Name: Ned Shappley Title: QAM Company: METCO Environmental Sign Date: Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

## Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Page 1 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Facility Information: Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc. 4200 Bells Lane

Louisville KY 40211- Contact: Susan Clark Phone: (502) 772-5705 Fax: Email: susan.clark@lubrizol.com Testing Company: METCO Environmental 3226 Commander Dr

Carrollton TX 75006- Contact:Ned Shappley Phone: (972) 931-7127 Fax: Email: nshappley@metcoenv.com

Air Permit Number: 129-97-TV S-LTX-TK-SCR-1 KY Permitted Maximum Process Rate: Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: Target Process Test Rat

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: FRS #: 110000741500

SCC / Description 64631010 MACT Source Categories - Vinyl-based Resins - Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production - Dispersion Process - Process Vents: Dispersion Process

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing: Permitted Source ID/Name:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 11.25 24 48 2 24

FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 11.25 147 66 2 12

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Comments Location Total organic compounds

(TOC) as Propane Method 25A 3 240 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 192 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1



### Page 2 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates.

Chlorine Method 26A 3 192 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 2,3,7,8-TCDD Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 OCDD Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 2,3,7,8-TCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 OCDF Method 23 3 360 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4Carbon Dioxide Method 3A CO2 6 180 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 Oxygen Method 3A O2 6 180 FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4



### Page 3 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 25A Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM Run Finish Time 4:10:00 PM 4:25:00 PM 3:00:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567 Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1166.5 1171.2 1145 1,160.900 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 38.05 38.58 40.77 39.133 Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 26A Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM Run Finish Time 3:42:00 PM 3:57:00 PM 2:32:00 PM Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 112.17 113.42 110.13 111.907 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 38.72 39.38 38.02 38.707 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 39.15 38.74 38.36 38.750 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567 Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 167.77 167.00 167.00 167.257 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,156.4 1,159.3 1,127.6 1,147.767 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,273.3 2,293.1 2,183.0 2,249.800 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.8 97.6 97.4 97.267 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Page 4 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 23 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM Run Finish Time 5:10:00 PM 5:25:00 PM 4:00:00 PM Net Run Time, minutes 360 360 360 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 220.95 229.43 226.47 225.617 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 38.05 38.58 40.77 39.133 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 39.33 37.40 39.28 38.670 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567 Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 167.92 165.49 168.00 167.137 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,166.5 1,171.2 1,145.0 1,160.900 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,271.2 2,261.7 2,267.9 2,266.933 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 104.2 105.2 103.400 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 10:45:00 AM Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 5:10:00 PM 1:45:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 1.5171 2.0374 4.6305 2.728 Oxygen, % 0 0 0 0.000 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1166.5 1166.5 1171.2 1,168.067 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 38.05 38.05 38.58 38.227 Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Page 5 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 3 Average Run Number 4 5 6 Test Date 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 2:25:00 PM 9:30:00 AM 1:00:00 PM Run Finish Time 5:25:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 4:00:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 4.4967 4.401 4.2366 4.378 Oxygen, % 0 0 0 0.000 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1171.2 1145 1145 1,153.733 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 38.58 40.77 40.77 40.040 Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 10:45:00 AM Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 5:10:00 PM 1:45:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 0 0 0 0.000 Oxygen, % 18.4357 17.7245 13.3836 16.515 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0 0 0 0.000 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 0 0 0 0.000 Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Page 6 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 3 Average Run Number 4 5 6 Test Date 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 2:25:00 PM 9:30:00 AM 1:00:00 PM Run Finish Time 5:25:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 4:00:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 0 0 0 0.000 Oxygen, % 13.1724 23.4306 23.0122 19.872 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0 0 0 0.000 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 0 0 0 0.000 Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Page 7 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Emissions Summary

Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 25A Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) as Average Reg Limit Run 1 2 3 ppm 8.07E-02 4.88E-02 0.00E+00 4.32E-02 ppm@3%O2 5.16E-01 1.15E-01 0.00E+00 2.10E-01 

### Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 26A Compound: Chlorine Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 15.739 0.965 55.525 2.41E+01 ppm 1.68E+00 1.02E-01 6.04E+00 2.61E+00 ppm@3%O2 1.07E+01 2.40E-01 1.37E+01 8.21E+00 

### Compound: Hydrogen Chloride Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 4.775 1.169 8.928 4.96E+00 ppm 9.92E-01 2.40E-01 1.89E+00 1.04E+00 ppm@3%O2 6.34E+00 5.65E-01 4.28E+00 3.73E+00 

### Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 23 Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000734 0.00000000777 0.00000000768 7.60E-09 ng/dscm 1.17E-03 1.20E-03 1.20E-03 1.19E-03 ng/dscm@3%O2 7.48E-03 2.83E-03 2.72E-03 4.34E-03 

### Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0000000109 0.00000000931 0.0000000167 1.23E-08 ng/dscm 1.74E-03 1.43E-03 2.60E-03 1.92E-03 ng/dscm@3%O2 1.11E-02 3.37E-03 5.89E-03 6.79E-03 

### Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000222 0.00000000265 0.00000000196 2.28E-09 ng/dscm 3.55E-04 4.08E-04 3.06E-04 3.56E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 2.27E-03 9.61E-04 6.93E-04 1.31E-03 

### Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000183 0.0000000016 0.00000000188 1.77E-09 ng/dscm 2.93E-04 2.46E-04 2.93E-04 2.77E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 1.87E-03 5.79E-04 6.64E-04 1.04E-03



### Page 8 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000819 0.00000000732 0.00000000982 8.44E-09 ng/dscm 1.31E-03 1.13E-03 1.53E-03 1.32E-03 ng/dscm@3%O2 8.37E-03 2.66E-03 3.47E-03 4.83E-03 

### Compound: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000198 0.00000000178 0.00000000206 1.94E-09 ng/dscm 3.17E-04 2.74E-04 3.21E-04 3.04E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 2.03E-03 6.45E-04 7.27E-04 1.13E-03 

### Compound: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000465 0.00000000467 0.00000000845 5.92E-09 ng/dscm 7.43E-04 7.19E-04 1.32E-03 9.27E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 4.75E-03 1.69E-03 2.99E-03 3.14E-03 

### Compound: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000225 0.00000000263 0.00000000216 2.35E-09 ng/dscm 3.60E-04 4.05E-04 3.37E-04 3.67E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 2.30E-03 9.54E-04 7.64E-04 1.34E-03 

### Compound: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000136 0.00000000178 0.00000000191 1.68E-09 ng/dscm 2.17E-04 2.74E-04 2.98E-04 2.63E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 1.39E-03 6.45E-04 6.75E-04 9.03E-04 

### Compound: 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000192 0.00000000236 0.00000000234 2.21E-09 ng/dscm 3.07E-04 3.63E-04 3.65E-04 3.45E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 1.96E-03 8.55E-04 8.27E-04 1.21E-03 

### Compound: 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000918 0.0000000106 0.0000000129 1.09E-08 ng/dscm 1.47E-03 1.63E-03 2.01E-03 1.70E-03 ng/dscm@3%O2 9.40E-03 3.84E-03 4.55E-03 5.93E-03 

### Compound: 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000475 0.00000000565 0.00000000793 6.11E-09



### Page 9 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

ng/dscm 7.59E-04 8.70E-04 1.24E-03 9.56E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 4.85E-03 2.05E-03 2.81E-03 3.24E-03 

### Compound: 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.000000013 0.0000000139 0.0000000137 1.35E-08 ng/dscm 2.08E-03 2.14E-03 2.14E-03 2.12E-03 ng/dscm@3%O2 1.33E-02 5.04E-03 4.85E-03 7.73E-03 

### Compound: 2,3,7,8-TCDD Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00000000161 0.00000000159 0.00000000187 1.69E-09 ng/dscm 2.57E-04 2.45E-04 2.92E-04 2.65E-04 ng/dscm@3%O2 1.64E-03 5.77E-04 6.62E-04 9.60E-04 

### Compound: 2,3,7,8-TCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0000000177 0.0000000183 0.0000000193 1.84E-08 ng/dscm 2.83E-03 2.82E-03 3.01E-03 2.89E-03 ng/dscm@3%O2 1.81E-02 6.64E-03 6.82E-03 1.05E-02 

### Compound: OCDD Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0000000305 0.0000000301 0.0000000318 3.08E-08 ng/dscm 4.88E-03 4.63E-03 4.96E-03 4.82E-03 ng/dscm@3%O2 3.12E-02 1.09E-02 1.12E-02 1.78E-02 

### Compound: OCDF Average Reg Limit RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0000000101 0.00000000887 0.0000000136 1.09E-08 ng/dscm 1.61E-03 1.37E-03 2.12E-03 1.70E-03 ng/dscm@3%O2 1.03E-02 3.23E-03 4.80E-03 6.11E-03 

### Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 Compound: Carbon Dioxide Average Reg Limit Run 1 2 3 

### Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 3 Compound: Carbon Dioxide Average Reg Limit Run 4 5 6 

### Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 Compound: Oxygen Average Reg Limit Run 1 2 3 

### Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 3

Page 10 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Compound: Oxygen Average Reg Limit Run 4 5 6



### Page 11 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data Process: Work Produced Comment: SCC: 64631010

Run Value Comment

Unit of Measure Target Low Target High 1 1 Default

Tons/hr 0 0

APCD: WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY Comment: Run Value Comment

Unit of Measure Target Value 1 1 Default 0

Page 12 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 25A Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM Run Finish Time 4:10:00 PM 4:25:00 PM 3:00:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567 Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800 Fuel Factor 0 0 0 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1166.5 1171.2 1145 1,160.900 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 38.05 38.58 40.77 39.133 Analyzer Make Thermo Environmental Thermo

Environment

al Thermo Environmenta

l Analyzer Model 55I 55I 55I Analyzer Serial Number 20171660 20171660 20171660 20,171,660. 000 Operating Range 100 100 100 100.000 Operating Units ppm ppm ppm No. Readings/Avg. 240 240 240 240.000 Calibration Set 7 7 7 7.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.02 0.1 0 0.027 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift -0.17 -0.05 -0.15 -0.123 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID prop ALM067192 prop

ALM067192 prop

ALM067192 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 45.6 46.82 46.8 46.407 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 1.9 3.12 3.1 2.707 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.1 0 0 0.033 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.05 -0.15 -0.15 -0.117 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.12 0.1 0 0.073 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID prop ALM067192 prop

ALM067192 prop

ALM067192 Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 46.82 46.8 0 31.207 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 3.12 3.1 -43.7 -12.493 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 1.22 0.02 46.8 16.013 Cavg 0.05 0.03 0 0.027 Cavg Units ppmvw ppmvw ppmvw Cgas 0.0807 0.0488 0 0.043 Cgas Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw 0.05 0.03 0 0.027



### Page 13 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Cgasw Units ppmvw ppmvw ppmvw


### Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 26A Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM Run Finish Time 3:42:00 PM 3:57:00 PM 2:32:00 PM Net Traversing Points 48 48 48 Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.257 0.257 0.257 0.257 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.990 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.984 0.984 0.984 0.984 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.57 29.36 29.63 29.520 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.16 1.19 1.09 1.147 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 114.042 115.373 111.884 113.766 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 63.56 60.16 64.11 62.610 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 112.17 113.42 110.13 111.907 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 1506.3 1565.8 1435.6 1,502.567 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 70.88 73.68 67.55 70.703 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 38.72 39.38 38.02 38.707 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 39.15 38.74 38.36 38.750 Dry Mole Fraction 0.6128 0.6126 0.6198 0.615 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567 Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.1 82.1 82.7 81.633 Fuel Factor 1.56 1.65 1.84 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.01 29.27 29.21 29.163 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 24.75 25.02 24.95 24.907 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.5 -0.5 -0.3 -0.433 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.53 29.32 29.61 29.487 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 167.77 167.00 167.00 167.257 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.4900073727 7766 0.501206986

782949 0.4572928661

27374 0.483
Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 54.91 55.39 52.73 54.343 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 0.690 0.690 0.690 0.690 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,156.4 1,159.3 1,127.6 1,147.767 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,273.3 2,293.1 2,183.0 2,249.800 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.8 97.6 97.4 97.267 Percent Excess Air, % 594.1 158.8 147.2 300.033 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 11.25 11.25 11.25 Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Page 14 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 23 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM Run Finish Time 5:10:00 PM 5:25:00 PM 4:00:00 PM Net Traversing Points 72 72 72 Net Run Time, minutes 360 360 360 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.257 0.257 0.257 0.257 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.990 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.009 1.009 1.009 1.009 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.54 29.36 29.63 29.510 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.30 1.35 1.33 1.327 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 221.982 226.812 223.340 224.045 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 70.15 58.57 62.02 63.580 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 220.95 229.43 226.47 225.617 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 2884.4 3062.4 3312.5 3,086.433 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 135.73 144.11 155.87 145.237 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 38.05 38.58 40.77 39.133 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 39.33 37.40 39.28 38.670 Dry Mole Fraction 0.6195 0.626 0.6072 0.618 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567 Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.1 82.1 82.7 81.633 Fuel Factor 1.56 1.65 1.84 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.01 29.27 29.21 29.163 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 24.82 25.27 25.07 25.053 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.500 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.50 29.32 29.59 29.470 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 167.92 165.49 168.00 167.137 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.4900073727 7766 0.493551960

768793 0.4947774203

06099 0.493
Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 54.86 54.63 54.78 54.757 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 0.690 0.690 0.690 0.690 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,166.5 1,171.2 1,145.0 1,160.900 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,271.2 2,261.7 2,267.9 2,266.933 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 104.2 105.2 103.400 Percent Excess Air, % 594.1 158.8 147.2 300.033 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 11.25 11.25 11.25 Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000



### Page 15 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 10:45:00 AM Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 5:10:00 PM 1:45:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 1.5171 2.0374 4.6305 2.728 Oxygen, % 0 0 0 0.000 Fuel Factor 0 0 0 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1166.5 1166.5 1171.2 1,168.067 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 38.05 38.05 38.58 38.227 Analyzer Make Horiba Horiba Horiba Analyzer Model VA-3000 VA-3000 VA-3000 Analyzer Serial Number YGN781BP YGN781BP YGN781BP Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000 Operating Units % % % No. Readings/Avg. 720 720 720 720.000 Calibration Set 4 4 5 4.333 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.01 0.09 0.05 0.050 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0.3 0.7 0.35 0.450 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CO2 ALM 065652 CO2 ALM

065652 CO2 ALM

065652 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 10.99 11.06 11.02 11.023 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.8 -0.45 -0.35 -0.533 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.09 -0.01 0.09 0.057 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 0.7 0.2 0.55 0.483 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.367 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CO2 ALM 065652 CO2 ALM

065652 CO2 ALM

065652 Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.06 11.03 11.03 11.040 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias -0.45 -0.6 -0.3 -0.450 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.35 0.15 0.05 0.183 Cavg 1.55 2.06 4.64 2.750 Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd Cgas 1.5171 2.0374 4.6305 2.728 Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw Units



### Page 16 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 3 Average Run Number 4 5 6 Test Date 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 2:25:00 PM 9:30:00 AM 1:00:00 PM Run Finish Time 5:25:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 4:00:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 4.4967 4.401 4.2366 4.378 Oxygen, % 0 0 0 0.000 Fuel Factor 0 0 0 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1171.2 1145 1145 1,153.733 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 38.58 40.77 40.77 40.040 Analyzer Make Horiba Horiba Horiba Analyzer Model VA-3000 VA-3000 VA-3000 Analyzer Serial Number YGN781BP YGN781BP YGN781BP Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000 Operating Units % % % No. Readings/Avg. 720 720 720 720.000 Calibration Set 5 6 6 5.667 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.09 -0.08 -0.07 -0.020 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0.55 -0.25 -0.2 0.033 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CO2 ALM 065652 CO2 ALM

065652 CO2 ALM

065652 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.03 11.05 11.02 11.033 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.3 0.65 0.5 0.283 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.03 -0.07 -0.09 -0.063 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.05 -0.2 -0.3 -0.183 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.6 0.05 0.1 0.250 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CO2 ALM 065652 CO2 ALM

065652 CO2 ALM

065652 Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 10.95 11.02 11.09 11.020 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias -0.7 0.5 0.85 0.217 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.4 0.15 0.35 0.300 Cavg 4.47 4.33 4.17 4.323 Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd Cgas 4.4967 4.401 4.2366 4.378 Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw Units



### Page 17 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 11/4/2014 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 10:45:00 AM Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 5:10:00 PM 1:45:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 0 0 0 0.000 Oxygen, % 18.4357 17.7245 13.3836 16.515 Fuel Factor 0 0 0 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0 0 0 0.000 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 0 0 0 0.000 Analyzer Make Horiba Horiba Horiba Analyzer Model VA-3000 VA-3000 VA-3000 Analyzer Serial Number YGN781B YGN781B YGN781B Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000 Operating Units % % % No. Readings/Avg. 720 720 720 720.000 Calibration Set 1 1 2 1.333 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.09 0.19 0.23 0.170 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0.6 1.11 0.95 0.887 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID O2 ALM 065652 O2 ALM

065652 O2 ALM

065652 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.04 11.12 11.05 11.070 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.3 0.1 -0.25 -0.150 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.19 0.1 0.27 0.187 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 1.11 0.65 1.16 0.973 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.51 0.46 0.21 0.393 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID O2 ALM 065652 O2 ALM

065652 O2 ALM

065652 Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.12 11.07 11.08 11.090 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.1 -0.15 -0.1 -0.050 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.267 Cavg 18.31 17.63 13.29 16.410 Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd Cgas 18.4357 17.7245 13.3836 16.515 Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw Units



### Page 18 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 3 Average Run Number 4 5 6 Test Date 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 11/7/2014 Run Start Time 2:25:00 PM 9:30:00 AM 1:00:00 PM Run Finish Time 5:25:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 4:00:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 0 0 0 0.000 Oxygen, % 13.1724 23.4306 23.0122 19.872 Fuel Factor 0 0 0 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0 0 0 0.000 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000 Moisture, % 0 0 0 0.000 Analyzer Make Horiba Horiba Horiba Analyzer Model VA-3000 VA-3000 VA-3000 Analyzer Serial Number YGN781B YGN781B YGN781B Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000 Operating Units % % % No. Readings/Avg. 720 720 720 720.000 Calibration Set 2 3 3 2.667 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.27 0.2 0.19 0.220 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 1.16 1.06 1.01 1.077 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID O2 ALM 065652 O2 ALM

017907 O2 ALM

017907 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.08 10.96 11.13 11.057 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.1 -44.67 -43.82 -29.530 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 12668
Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.01 0.19 0.06 0.080 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.25 1.01 0.35 0.370 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 1.41 0.05 0.66 0.707 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID O2 ALM 065652 O2 ALM

017907 O2 ALM

017907 Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.14 11.13 11.18 11.150 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.2 -43.82 -43.57 -29.063 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.3 0.850000000 000001 0.25 0.467
Cavg 13.16 12.97 12.88 13.003 Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd Cgas 13.1724 23.4306 23.0122 19.872 Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd Fuel Type Fw 0 0 0 0.000 Fc 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw Units



### Page 19 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Included Attachments:

Completeness Questions: 

### Attachments EPA Method 1Location Supporting Documentation (Item 9) (optional) Method 1 Location.pdf



### Cyclonic Flow Absence Supporting Documentation (Item 10) Lubrizol_cycloniccheck.pdf DGMs Calibrations , DTI Calibrations, and Nozzle Calibrations Lubrizol_Calibration.pdf Sampling Locations Dimensions and Point Locations 14-295 Lubrizol Sampling Points.pdf Run Field Data Sheets/Moisture Recovery Lubrizol_Lousiville_RunSheets.pdf
Lab Data Method 18 - Direct Interface.pdf
Lab Data Method 316.pdf
Lab Data Method 26A.pdf
Lab Data Method 18 -EG.pdf


### Lab Data Method 18 - AA.pdf
Lab Data 0010.pdf
Lab Data D_Fs.pdf
Lab Data Method 0031.pdf 

### Chain-of-Custody Method 26A.pdf Documentation of competence as an AETB or QI for stationary source testing. METCO Cert - 2014-No FSMO.docx

Field Notes Lubrizol Log Book.xlsx
Reference Method Monitor Data ReferenceMEthodMOnitorData.pdf Calibration Gas Certificates (Item 16) Reference Method Monitor Certificates.pdf Results of audit sample analyses and Audit Provider evaluation reports FinalReport80077.pdf

Completeness Quality Assessment Questions

As described in ASTM D7036-12 Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies, does the testing firm meet the criteria as an AETB or is the person in charge of the field team a QI for the type of testing conducted? A certificate from an independent organization (e.g., Stack Testing Accreditation council (STAC), California Air Resources Board (CARB), National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) Yes

Page 20 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

or self declaration provides documentation of competence as an AETB. Is a description and drawing of test location provided? Yes 

### Has a description of deviations from published test methods been provided, or is there a statement that deviations were not required to obtain data representative of typical facility operation? No No Method Deviations

Is a full description of the process and the unit being tested (including installed controls) provided? No Separate Document

Has a detailed discussion of source operating conditions, air pollution control device operations and the representativeness of measurements made during the test been provided? Yes



### Were the operating parameters for the tested process unit and associated controls described and reported? Yes Separate Document

Is there an assessment of the validity, representativeness, achievement of DQO's and usability of the data? Yes

Have field notes addressing issues that may influence data quality been provided? Yes

Have the following been included in the report: Dry Gas Meter (DGM) calibrations, pitot tuve and nozzle inspections? No Combined Calibration Attachment for DGM and Nozzle Calibrations

Was the Method 1 sample point evaluation included in the report? Yes

Were the cyclonic flow checks included in the report? Yes Were the raw sampling data and test sheets included in the report? Yes



### Did the report include a description and flow diagram of the recovery procedures? Yes

Was the laboratory certied/accredited to perform these analyses? No The laboratories used for this testing have TNI accreditations, However Kentucky does not currently have a TNI requirement for "Air Laboratories"

Did the report include a complete laboratory report and flow diagram of sample analysis? Yes



### Were the chain-of-custody forms included in the report? Yes Did the report include a complete description of the intrumental method sampling system? Yes

Did the report include calibration gas certifications? Yes Did the report include interference tests? Yes

Page 21 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Regulatory Review Questions: Were the response time tests included in the report? Yes Were the calibration error tests included in the report? Yes Did the report include drift tests? Yes Did the report include system bias tests? Yes Were the converter efficiency tests included in the report? Yes

Did the report include statification checks? Yes 

### Did the report include the raw data for the instrumental method? Yes



### Regulatory Review Quality Assessment Questions

As described in ASTM D7036-12 Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies, does the testing firm meet the criteria as an AETB or is the person in charge of the field team a QI for the type of testing conducted? A certificate from an independent organization (e.g., STAC, CARB, NELAP) or self declaration provides documentation of competence as an AETB. Was a representative of the regulatory agency on site during the test? Is a description and drawing of test location provided? Is there documentation that the source or the test company sought and obtained approval for deviations from the published test method prior to conducting the test or that the tester's assertion that deviations were not required to obtain data representative of operations that are typical for the facility? Were all test method deviations acceptable? Is a full description of the process and the unit being tested (including installed controls) provided? Has a detailed discussion of source operating conditions, air pollution control device operations and the representativeness of measurements made during the test been provided? 

### Is there documentation that the required process monitors have been calibrated and that the calibration is acceptable? Was the process capacity documented? Was the process operating within an appropriate range for the test program objective? Were process data concurrent with testing?

Page 22 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Were data included in the report for all parameters for which limits will be set? Did the report discuss the representativeness of the facility operations, control device operation, and the measurements of the target pollutants, and were any changes from published test methods or process and control device monitoring protocols identified? Were all sampling issues handled such that data quality was not adversely affected? Was the DGM pre-test calibration within the criteria specified by the test method? Was the DGM post-test calibration within the criteria specified by the test method? Were thermocouple calibrations within method criteria? 

### Was the pitot tube inspection acceptable? Were nozzle inspections acceptable? Were flow meter calibrations acceptable? 

### Were the appropriate number and location of sampling points used? Did the cyclonic flow evaluation show the presence of an acceptable average gas flow angle? Were all data required by the method recorded? Were required leak checks performed and did the checks meet method requirements? Was the required minimum sample volume collected? Did probe, filter, and impinger exit temperatures meet method criteria (as applicable)? Did isokinetic sampling rates meet method criteria? 

### Was the sampling time at each point greater than 2 minutes and the same for each point? Was the recovery process consistent with the method? Were all required blanks collected in the field? Where performed, were blank corrections handled per method requirements? Were sample volumes clearly marked on the jar or measured and recorded? Was the laboratory cerified/accredited to perform these analyses? Did the laboratory note the sample volume upon receipt?

Page 23 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

If sample loss occurred, was the compensation method used, documented, and approved for the method? Were the physical characteristics of the samples (e.g., color, volume, integrity, pH, temperature) recorded and consistent with the method? Were sample hold times within method requirements? Does the laboratory report document the analytical procedures and techniques? Were all laboratory QA requirements documented? Were analytical standards required by the method documented? 

### Were required laboratory duplicates within acceptable limits? Were required spike recoveries within method requirements? Were method-specific analytical blanks analyzed? 

### If problems occurred during analysis, is there sufficient documentation to conclude that the problems did not adversely affect the sample results? Was the analytical detection limit specified in the test report? Is the reported detection limit adequate fort he purposes of the test program? Do the chain-of-custody forms indicate acceptable management of collected samples between collection and analysis? Was a complete description of the sampling system provided? Were calibration standards used prior to the end of the expiration date?

Did calibration standards meet method criteria? 

### Did interference checks meet method requirements? Was a response time test performed? Did calibration error tests meet method requirements? Were drift tests performed after each run and did they meet method requirements? Did system bias checks meet method requirements? Was the NOX converter test acceptable? Was a statification assessment performed? 

### Was the duration of each sample run within method criteria?

Page 24 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Was the appropriate traverse performed during sample collection, or was the probe placed at an appropriate center point (if allowed by the method)? Were sample times at each point uniform and did they meet method requirements? Were sample lines heated sufficiently to prevent potential adverse data quality issues? Was all data required by the method recorded?

Page 25 of 26

### Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Page 26 of 26