alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.1.4


CELSION CORPORATION





CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION








Celsion Corporation (the “Corporation”), a corporation duly organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), does hereby certify that:





1.           The name of the Corporation is Celsion Corporation.





2.           Pursuant to Section 242 of the DGCL, on March 18, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted by written consent, a resolution setting forth the proposed amendment, as set forth below, of the Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation, as amended (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), declared the amendment advisable and directed that such proposed amendment be submitted for consideration and action thereon by the stockholders of the Corporation at the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders called pursuant to notice given in accordance with Section 222 of the DGCL:





The first sentence of the first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation shall be deleted in its entirety and the following shall be substituted in lieu thereof:





The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 75,100,000 shares, consisting of (i) 75,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), and (ii) 100,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Preferred Stock”).





3.           Pursuant to Section 242 of the DGCL, the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote on the matter, voted in favor of, approved and adopted the foregoing
proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation at the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders duly convened and held on May 15, 2009.





4.           The foregoing amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





-Signatures appear on following page-














The Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed and executed in its corporate name by its President and attested to by its Secretary, who declare, affirm, acknowledge and certify, under the penalties of perjury, that this is their free act and deed and that the facts
stated herein are true as of the 21st day of May, 2009.








ATTEST:                                                                     CELSION
CORPORATION,


a
Delaware corporation











/s/ Sean Moran         By:   /s/ Micheal H. Tardugno


Sean Moran                                                                            
Michael H. Tardugno


Secretary                                                                                  President
& CEO
Exhibit 13.1



Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Mission NewEnergy Limited (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2013 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: October 31, 2013  | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Nathan Mahalingam   | 
|Nathan Mahalingam       | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|Date: October 31, 2013  | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Guy Burnett         | 
|Guy Burnett             | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00544-CV

Style: Terry Neff and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v.

v. Nicholas F. Brady, David J. Butters, William E. Macaulay, Robert B. Millard,

Robert K. Moses, Jr., Robert A. Rayne, Bernard J. Duroc-Danner, and Bruce M. Martin

Date motions filed*: October 5, 2015

Type of motions: Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Peter A. Wald and 

Unopposed Motion in Support of Peter A. Wald’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro 

Hac Vice

Party filing motions: Weatherford International Ltd. and Peter A. Wald, and

Rebecca N. Brandt, Counsel for Weatherford International Ltd.

Document to be filed:

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed 

 Other: _____________________________________ 

. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: October 15, 2015
Anthony Victor LEROSE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3669

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-10509

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KELVIN DEVINE FAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:99-CR-64-2-C

--------------------

December 13, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Kelvin Devine Fay seeks to appeal his conviction for

possession of a firearm by a felon and his sentence of 87 months’

imprisonment. He argues that the felon in possession statute, 18

U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), is unconstitutional. He acknowledges that

this court has previously rejected this argument in United States

v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240 (5th Cir. 1996) and United States v. Kuban,

94 F.3d 971 (5th Cir. 1996). Fay asks this Court, however, to

revisit the matter based on the Supreme Court’s recent decisions

in United States v. Morrison, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S. Ct. 1740
No. 00-10509

-2-

(2000) and Jones v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S. Ct. 1904

(2000).

The Government argues that Fay has waived his right to raise

this issue on appeal. Fay has not filed a reply brief addressing

the waiver-of-appeal issue.

A defendant may, as part of a valid plea agreement, waive

his statutory right to appeal his sentence. United States v.

Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). To be valid, the

waiver must be an informed one. Id. When the record clearly

shows that the defendant read and understood the plea agreement

and that he raised no question regarding the waiver-of-appeal

provision, the plea agreement is upheld. United States v.

Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994).

The district court asked Fay if he had read and if he

understood the plea agreement and in particular the waiver-ofappeal provision. Fay swore in the affirmative. There is

nothing in the record to indicate that Fay did not understand or

was confused by the waiver-of-appeal provision. See Portillo, 18

F.3d at 292-93. Fay’s and his counsel’s attestations indicate

that he reviewed and understood “every part” of the plea

agreement. Fay makes no argument to the contrary. The record

shows that Fay knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to

appeal his conviction, including the constitutionality of the

statute to which he pleaded guilty, in his plea agreement. 

Portillo, 18 F.3d at 292-93.

Assuming that Fay did not waive his right to appeal the

alleged incorrect application of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 under exception
No. 00-10509

-3-

(b) to the waiver-of-appeal provision, Fay specifically

acknowledges that he is raising this point of error for future

appellate purposes only. He concedes that this Court determined

in United States v. Jackson, 220 F.3d 635, 639 (5th Cir. 2000)

that the Texas felony offense of Unauthorized Use of a Motor

Vehicle is a “crime of violence” as that term is defined in

U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,141] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 5, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Seagate Technology, Bloomington, Minnesota. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

      ( print page 15765)    
Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of March 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7747 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Spencer HARPER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2604

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of SeaLife  Corporation (the Company),  does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that:


The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for three month period ended  September 30,
2005  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in all  material  respects,  with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


November 21, 2005

                                      By:  /S/ ROBERT A. MCCASLIN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert A. McCaslin,
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
K.H., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-820

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Martye S. GATTIE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2383

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Certiorari is denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            DURAKON INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       (In thousands, except per
                                                                              share amounts)

                                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                      ----------------------------
                                                                         1997              1996
                                                                       ---------       -----------       
<S>                                                                        <C>           <C>
Net earnings available to common stockholders                             $  257          $2,138
                                                                          ======          ======
PRIMARY

    Average number of shares oustanding                                    6,308           6,520

    Add:  Dilutive effect of stock options based
              upon treasury stock method                                      60             147
                                                                          ------          ------
          Total                                                            6,368           6,667
                                                                          ======          ======
          Per share amount                                                $ 0.04          $ 0.32
                                                                          ======          ======

FULLY DILUTED

    Average number of shares outstanding                                   6,308           6,520

    Add:  Dilutive effect of stock options based
              upon treasury stock method                                      60             147
                                                                          ------          ------        
          Total                                                            6,368           6,667
                                                                          ======          ======

          Per share amount                                                $ 0.04          $ 0.32
                                                                          ======          ======
</TABLE>





 Note:  This calculation is required by Regulation S-K, Item 601, and is filed
        as an exhibit under item 6(b) of Form 10-Q.
EXHIBIT
3.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Novicius Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2017
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Cassina, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) | The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                         |                             | 
|------------------------ | --------------------------- | 
|/s/
    Michael Johnston |                            
|Name:                    | Michael Johnston            | 
|Title:                   | Chief Financial
    Officer | 
|                         |                             | 



Date:
January 15, 2019
LIBERTY INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITERS, Appellant, v. FRISKY LADY VENTURES, LLC and Dempsey Marine Electronics and Electrical, A Foreign Corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3839

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2018]

Jerry D. Hamilton, Michael J. Dono and Karina M. Cerda Collazo of Hamilton, Miller & Birthisel, LLP, Miami, for appellant.

Stuart Sobel and John I. Criste, Jr. of Siegfried, Rivera, Hyman, Lerner, De La Torre, Mars & Sobel, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellee, Frisky Lady Ventures, LLC.

Per Curiam.

Liberty International Underwriters appeals a non-final order denying a motion to compel arbitration. Appellee, Frisky Lady Ventures, LLC, concedes error.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying the motion to compel arbitration and remand for the trial court to submit the action against Liberty International Underwriters to arbitration.

*Reversed and remanded* .

Gross, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Paul D. Meringolo, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge
and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul D. Meringolo                                       
|Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President



Date: February 1, 2006
A.W., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2384

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
J.P., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Ileana ROS-LEHTINEN, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2933

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Ian L. TUTTLE, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0907

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017. Rehearing Denied January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Irma RABUN, Individually and on behalf of others similary situated v. ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

NO. 2018-CC-0120

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Critical Digital Data, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K, for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, I, Dina Moskowitz, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   Date:  December
29, 2009
 /s/
      DINA MOSKOWITZName: Dina
      Moskowitz
                    Its: Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive & Financial
      Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDICAL
DISCOVERIES, INC. MARCH 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,033
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,511
<PP&E>                                          72,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,467,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,557,317
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,937,193)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,803
<SALES>                                          2,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,999
<CGS>                                            1,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (199,167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (199,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (199,167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>