alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1151 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1151

     To terminate authorizations for the use of military force and 
declarations of war no later than 10 years after the enactment of such 
                    authorizations or declarations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2023

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Ossoff, and Mr. Welch) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To terminate authorizations for the use of military force and 
declarations of war no later than 10 years after the enactment of such 
                    authorizations or declarations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountability for Endless Wars Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR THE USE OF MILITARY FORCE AND 
              DECLARATIONS OF WAR.

    (a) Future Authorizations for the Use of Military Force and 
Declarations of War.--Any authorization for the use of military force 
or declaration of war enacted into law after the date of the enactment 
of this Act shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date 
of the enactment of such authorization or declaration.
    (b) Existing Authorizations for the Use of Military Force and 
Declarations of War.--Any authorization for the use of military force 
or declaration of war enacted before the date of the enactment of this 
Act shall terminate on the date that is 6 months after the date of such 
enactment.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 950 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 9, 2024. 

Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of 

daily meeting of the House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon 

on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 

Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1026 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety 

or gun violence prevention. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. KAINE, 

Ms. SMITH, Mr. CASEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. WELCH, Mr. 

CARPER, Mr. MERKLEY, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. REED, Ms. WARREN, Ms. 

CANTWELL, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. HEINRICH, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. BALDWIN, and 

Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun violence prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Violence Preven5 tion Research Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1026 IS

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH BY CDC ON FIREARMS 

2 SAFETY OR GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION. 

3 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Centers 

4 for Disease Control and Prevention $50,000,000 for each 

5 of fiscal years 2024 through 2029 for the purpose of con6 ducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun 

7 violence prevention under the Public Health Service Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). The amount authorized to be ap9 propriated by the preceding sentence is in addition to any 

10 other amounts authorized to be appropriated for such pur11 pose. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Herbert HITSON v. Betty CASON, Judge of Probate, et al.

1151086

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXCALIBUR
International Marine Corp.
 Tel:(02)
8T51-057? -Fax:(02) 8751.1772   Tel: (04) 2656.1281 • Fax:(04)
2656-3670


September
23, 2008
    Dear Ms.
Shannon Chiang:


With
respect to the proposal regarding the USD 2 Million short term loan discussed in
our board meeting dated September 17, 2008, we are unable to locate the
prospect lender due to unfavorable terms asked by the lender. As such, on behalf
of the Excalibur International Marine Corporation, I would like to make a
request that the EFT Biotech Holdings Inc., to consider the following terms for
the short term loan of USD 2 Million. Our offer for such loan is an interest
rate of 3.75% per month and the term of the loan will be no more than 60 days.
The loan can be paid off in advance without penalty. The loan will be
mainly for the purpose of tax payment for our new-arrival vessel and short
term capital needs of the company. Please kindly respond to our offer above at
your earliest convenience.


Excalibur
International Marine Corporation


Chiao,
      Jen Ho
                          Chairman


Steve
      Hsiao
                          General
      Manager
Opinion issued July 1 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 21 - 00017 - CV

——————————— IN RE THE TASA GROUP, INC. , Relat or Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPINION Relator, The TASA Group, Inc., has filed an unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of this original proceeding for writ of mandamus, averring that the parties have settled all claims and controversies in the underlying proceeding
. 1 We grant the motion a nd dismiss this original proceeding
.

1 The underlying case is The TASA Group, Inc. v. Garcia and Martinez, LLP , cause number 2019

- 68269 , pending in the 113th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Rabeea Sultan Collier presiding.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Countiss
.
Exhibit 13.1



Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Mission NewEnergy Limited (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: October 30, 2012  | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Nathan Mahalingam   | 
|Nathan Mahalingam       | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|Date: October 30, 2012  | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Guy Burnett         | 
|Guy Burnett             | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.2**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**          In connection with the quarterly report of Landmark Land Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joe V. Olree, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.     November 13, 2006 /s/ JOE V. OLREE         Joe V. Olree    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Landmark Land Company, Inc.
Kelly WHITED, Vicki Whited and Darrin Lavine, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to Lasalle Bank, NA as Trustee on Behalf of the Holders of the Wamu Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2007-HY1, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1163

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### In re Melvin M.L. MCELWEE, Sr., Petitioner. Great American Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McElwee Brothers, Inc. & Tri-State Design Construction Co, Inc. (a joint venture), McElwee Brothers, Inc., Tri-State Design Construction Co., Inc., Sylvia Hurst, Ronald Davis, and Beverly Davis, Defendants, and Melvin M.L. McElwee, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. MISC. 764, 04-1228.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 27, 2004.

*ORDER*

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.*

Melvin M.L. McElwee, Sr. petitions for a writ of mandamus to prohibit the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana from issuing contempt sanctions.

In addition to the mandamus petition, McElwee appealed an order of the district court that denied certain motions, appeal 04-1228. McElwee recently moved for reconsideration of our order dismissing that appeal for failure to pay the filing fee. It appears that there are one or more appeals pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit related to the district court case.

This court is a court of limited jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1292(c), 1295. Review *319of this case, by mandamus or appeal, is not within our jurisdiction.

Accordingly,

(1) The mandamus petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

(2) McElwee’s motion for reconsideration of our order dismissing his appeal is denied because we have no jurisdiction over his appeal.

*

 Because McElwee requests immediate relief, this matter is being considered by a single judge.
Carlton W. MCGEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2318

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Steven SERRANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2499

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      13, 2009 | /s/ Joe V. Olree                                       |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Joe      V. Olree                                      |
|                                    | Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                    | Landmark      Land Company, Inc.                       |
Gerald F. MOSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4768

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (141)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,089
<PP&E>                                         106,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,014)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,224
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,798
<COMMON>                                        19,032
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,730
<SALES>                                         56,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,577
<CGS>                                           30,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,276)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,519)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN RE: John Arthur BRITTAIN

NO. 2018-B-0188

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel commenced an investigation into numerous complaints of serious professional misconduct against respondent, including his conversion of client funds. Following the filing of two sets of formal charges against respondent, the parties submitted a joint *496petition for consent discipline seeking respondent's disbarment. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that John Arthur Brittain, Louisiana Bar Roll number 24035, be and he hereby is disbarred, retroactive to March 29, 2017, the date of his interim suspension. His name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall make restitution to his clients as set forth in the petition for consent discipline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
Exhibit 99.1


                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For DaimlerChrysler NA Holding
Securities, Series 2004-10 (the "Trust"), certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect
                  of the Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the
                  Trustee in respect of the Trust and all distribution or
                  servicing reports filed in respect of the Trust during the
                  2007 calendar year;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports,
                  taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
                  the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required
                  to be provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee
                  under the trust agreement for inclusion in these reports is
                  included in these reports;

         4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my
                  knowledge, except as disclosed in this annual report, the
                  Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
                  and

         5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating
                  to the Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or
                  similar standards based upon the report provided by an
                  independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
                  compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
                  Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
                  trust agreement, that is included in these reports.

Date: March 28, 2008

By: /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
    -------------------------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President
Document

Exhibit 10.114

AMENDMENT NUMBER 24 TO SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 1


This Amendment Number 24 (“Amendment 24”), dated as of 17 December, 2021 (“Amendment 24 Effective Date”), by and between DXC Technology Services LLC, successor in interest to HP Enterprise Services, LLC (“Provider”) and Sabre GLBL Inc. (“Customer”) amends that certain Service Agreement No. 1, by and between Provider and Customer, dated as of 1 August 2020 (“Service Agreement No. 1”), made pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement by and between Provider and Customer, also dated as of 1 August 2020 (the “Master Agreement”). The Master Agreement and Service Agreement No. 1 are collectively known as the “Agreement”.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, Customer and Provider desire to amend certain terms and conditions of Service Agreement No. 1, as further described herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, Customer and Provider hereby agree as follows:


1.Amendments to Attachments and Appendices to Service Agreement No. 1. In order to reflect the amendments agreed to by the Parties, the following documents are hereby replaced in their entirety in the form attached to this Amendment 24 as the applicable Attachment number referred to in the below table for such document:


									
	Service Agreement No. 1 Document Reference
	Document Name	Amendment 24 Attachment Number

	Attachment C-1	RU Definitions	Attachment 1
	Attachment C-3	Pricing and Baselines	Attachment 2
	Attachment F-1	Mainframe ITTP	Attachment 3
	Appendix 1 to Attachment F-1
	Initial Project Schedule	Attachment 4
	Appendix 2 to Attachment F-1
	Pointer to FMO	Attachment 5




2.Counterparts. This Amendment 24 may be executed in several counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute a single agreement between the Parties.


3.Defined terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, the capitalized terms used in this Amendment 24 shall have the same meaning assigned to such capitalized terms in the Agreement.


4.Ratifications. The terms and provisions set forth in this Amendment 24 shall modify and supersede all inconsistent terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement (and all prior agreements, letters, proposals, discussions and other documents) regarding the matters addressed in this Amendment 24. Except as otherwise expressly modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are ratified and confirmed as if set forth herein verbatim.







Exhibit 10.114



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Provider and Customer have each caused this Amendment to be executed as below:




						
	SABRE GLBL INC.	
		
	Signature:	/s/ Chris Hamro
		
	Name:	Chris Hamro
		
	Title:	Sr. Director, Global Procurement
		
	Date:	December 20, 2021
		




						
	DXC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LLC
		
	Signature:	/s/ Joe Sequeira



		
	Name:	Joe Sequeira
		
	Title:	DXC Account General Manager - Sabre
		
	Date:	December 20, 2021
# Официален вестник C 38I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 038I |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 643 февруари 2021 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 038I

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 643 февруари 2021 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Становища |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Съвет |
| 2021/C 38 I/01 | Известие за оттегляне на обявление | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

V   Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Съвет

2021/C 38 I/01

Известие за оттегляне на обявление

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

V Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Съвет

| 3.2.2021 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CI 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2021

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CI 38/1

---

ИЗВЕСТИЕ ЗА ОТТЕГЛЯНЕ НА ОБЯВЛЕНИЕ

(2021/C 38 I/01)

Публикуването в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз (1) на обявление за свободна длъжност CONS/AD/167/21 се отменя.

---

(1)  OВ C 29 A, 26.1.2021 г., стр. 1.

---
FLEETWING CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. David RICKETTS, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-1124

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 17, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00308

- CV

RYAN HANSON

, Appellant

v.

ERVING JENSEN, KENNE TH DEAN AND

CHERYL LAWSON

, Appellee s

From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. COT

- 10

- 39673

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appell ant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellee s ha ve not filed a

response. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal d ismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 27, 2010

[CV06]
| Date:  | November                10, 2005 |   |                                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                             |   | /s/                David L. Johnson                     |
|   |                             |   | David                L. Johnson                         |
|   |                             |   | Chairman                of the Board,                   |
|   |                             |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer of |
|   |                             |   | Maxus                Realty Trust, Inc.                 |