# Revision to the Georgia State Implementation

Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rules for

Consumer and Commercial Products and for

Gasoline Marketing

, and for the Revision of the Georgia Rule for NO

x 

# Emissions from

Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Eng ines used to Generate Electricity

December 22 , 2014

Prepared by:



# Georgia Department of Natural Resources

Environmental Protection Division

Air Protection Branch

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rules for Consumer and Commercial Products and Gasoline Marketing

i 

### Executive Summary

This document contains Geo rgia’s request to revise the Georgia State Implementation Plan (SIP) to

remove Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa ), Consumer and Commercial Products ; and Georgia Rule

391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(bbb), Gasoline Marketing ; from the Georgia SIP ; and Georgia’s request to revi se the Georgia SIP to amend Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(mmm), NO

x Emissions f rom Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity

.

This request to revise the Georgia SIP is based on the requirement that it is consistent with sec tion 110 (l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rules for Consumer and Commercial Products and Gasoline Marketing

ii TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary

................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... i



### 1.0 Introduction and Background

................................ ................................ ..................... 1

1.1 The Atlanta Nonattainment Area

................................ ................................ ....................... 1

1.2 Clean Air Act Provisions

................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 4

1.3 Sect ion 110(l) Requirement

................................ ................................ ................................ 5

1.4 Removal Request

................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 6



### 2.0 Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(aaa), Consumer and Commercial Products

..................... 7

2.1 Calculations and Emissions

................................ ................................ ................................ 7

2.1.1 VOC Emission Differences

................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 7



### 3.0 Georg ia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(bbb), Gasoline Marketing

................................ ................. 9

3.1 Impact of Switching From Georgia Gas to Conventional Gasoline

.............................. 10

3.1.1 NO

x Em ission Analysis

– Ozone NAAQS

................................ ................................ .................... 10

3.1.2 VOC Emissions Analysis

– Ozone NAAQS

................................ ................................ ................. 13

3.1.3 NO

x Emission Analysis

- PM 2.5 NAAQS

................................ ................................ ...................... 15

3.2 Emissions Compared to Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets

................................ ............ 18

3.2.1 NO

x and VOC Emissions Analysis

– Ozone NAAQS

................................ ................................ .. 18

3.2.2 NO

x Emissions Analysis

- PM 2.5 NAAQS

................................ ................................ .................... 21

3.3 15

- County Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 23

3.3.1 15

- C ounty NO

x Emissions Analysis

................................ ................................ ............................. 23

3.3.1 15

- County VOC Emissions Analysis

................................ ................................ ............................ 25

3.4 Attainment Inventory Comparison

................................ ................................ ................. 26

3.4.1 Total NO

x Emissions and the 2008 Attainment Inventory

................................ ............................ 26

3.4.2 Total VOC Emissions and the 2008 Attainment Inventory

................................ ........................... 28

3.4.3 Total NO

x Emissions and the 2008 Attainment Inventory

................................ ............................ 30



### 4.0 Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(mmm), NO

x 

### Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines

and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity

................................ .......................... 33

4.1 Purpose of the Rule Revision

................................ ................................ ............................ 33

4.2 Rule Revision and Prevention of Incre ase in Emissions

– Ozone NAAQS

.................. 34

4.3 Rule Revision

– PM 2.5 NAAQS

................................ ................................ ......................... 34



### 5.0 NO

x 

### and VOC Sensitivity

................................ ................................ ........................... 36

5.1 Sensitivity of Ozone in Atlanta to NO

x and VOC Emissions

................................ ......... 36

5.1.1 Sensitivity Modeling NO

x and VOC Emissions

................................ ................................ ............ 36

5.1.2 Modeling Scenarios

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 36

5.1.3 Modeling Results

................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 37



### 6.0 Emission Offsets

................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 39

6.1 Emissions Increase

................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 39

6.2 Emissions Offset

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 40

6.2.1 Locomotive and Diesel Retrofit Con version Offsets

................................ ................................ .... 43

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rules for Consumer and Commercial Products and Gasoline Marketing

iii 6.3 Offset Equivalency Demonstration

................................ ................................ .................. 45



### 7.0 Contingency Measures

................................ ................................ .............................. 46

7.1.1 Contingency Provisions

- Stationary Source Offsets

................................ ................................ .... 46

7.1.2 Contingency Measure Triggers

................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 54

7.1.3 C ontingency Measures

- Implementation

................................ ................................ ...................... 55



### 8.0 Conclusion

................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 56

References

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 57

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rules for Consumer and Commercial Products and Gasoline Marketing

iv LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 3

- 1: Annual Trend of NO

x Emissions Increase From Switch Over to Conventional

Gasoline

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 11

Figure 3

- 2: Ann ual Trend VOC Emissions Increase From Switch Over to Conventional

Gasoline

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 13

Figure 3

- 3: Annual Trend of PM2.5 NO

x Emissions Increase From Switch Over To

Conventional Gasoline in the Atlanta PM 2.5 Nonattainment Area

................................ ....... 15

Figure 3

- 4: NO

x Emissions: Comparison of Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas to Baselines

and Budgets for the 1997 Ozone Maintenance Plan NAAQS

................................ ............... 19

Figure 3

- 5: VOC Emissions: Comparison of Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas to Baselines

and Budgets

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 20

Figure 3

- 6: NO

x Emissions: Comparison of Georg ia Gas and Conventional Gas to Baselines

and Budgets for the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS Maintenance Plan

................................ ................. 22

Figure 3

- 7: NO

x Emissions Increase Trends Associated With Switch to Conventional Gasoline

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 24

Figure 3

- 8: VOC Emissions Increase Trends Associated With Switch to Conventional Gasoline

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 25

Figure 3

- 9: Comparison of Total NO

x Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and

Conventional Gasoline vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

................................ ......................... 27

Figure 3

- 10: Comparison of Total VOC Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and

Conventional Gas oline vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

................................ ......................... 29

Figure 3

- 11: Comparison of Total NO

x Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and

Conventional Gasoline vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

................................ ......................... 31

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rules for Consumer and Commercial Products and Gasoline Marketing

v LIST OF TABLES

Table 2

- 1. VOC Emission Difference Due to Georgia Rule (aaa)

................................ ................... 8

Table 3

- 1. Comparison of On

- Road NO

x Emissions Between Georgia Gas and Conventional

Gas

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 12

Table 3

- 2. Comparison of On

- Road VOC Emissions Between Georgia Gas and Conventional

Gas

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 14

Table 3

- 3. Comparison of On

- Road NO

x Emissions Between Georgia Gas and Conventional

Gas

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 16

Table 3

- 4. Comparison of NO

x On

- Road Emissions With Co nventional Gas Versus 1997 Ozone

NAAQS Maintenance Plan MVEBs

................................ ................................ ........................ 20

Table 3

- 5. Comparison of VOC On

- Road Emissions With Conventional Gas Versus MVEBs 21

Table 3

- 6. Comparison of NO

x On

- Road Emissions With Conventional Gas Versus 1997 PM 2.5
NAAQS Maintenance Plan MVEBs

................................ ................................ ........................ 2 3

Table 3

- 7. Comparison of On

- Road NO

x Emissions B etween Georgia Gas and Conventional

Gas

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 24

Table 3

- 8. Comparison of On

- Road VOC Emissions Between Georgia Gas and Conventional

Gas

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 26

Table 3

- 9. 2008 Ozone NAA Inventory Comparison to Georgia Gas Margin and Conventional

Gas Margin

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 27

Table 3

- 10. Margin Allotted to Conventional Gasoline

................................ ................................ . 28

Table 3

- 11. Georgia Gas Margin and Conventional Gas Margin

................................ ................ 29

Table 3

- 12. Margin Allotted to Conventional Gasoline

................................ ................................ . 30

Table 3

- 13. 1997 PM 2.5 NAA Inventory Comparison to Georgia Gas Margin and Conventional

Gas Margin

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 32

Table 3

- 14. Margin Allotted to Conventional Gasoline

................................ ................................ . 32

Table 5

- 1. Normalized NO

x and VOC Sensitivity at 10 Atlanta Ozone Monitors

...................... 37

Table 5

- 2. Emissions Increases Due to Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb) and Effects on Ozone

Formation

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 38

Table 6

- 1. Interpolation of Emissions Increase Due to Georgia Rule (bbb)

............................... 39

T

able 6

- 2. Emissions Offsets Needed from Removal of Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb)

............ 40

Table 6

- 3. Locomotive Conversion Schedule

................................ ................................ ................. 43

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Georgia Rules for Consumer and Commercial Products and Gasoline Marketing

vi Table 6

- 5. Emissions Decrease Due to All Retrofits

................................ ................................ ....... 45

Table 6

- 6. Emissions Increases Compared to Available Emissions Offsets

................................ . 45

Table 7

- 1. Plant Yates Unit 3 Emissions Baseline For 2012

................................ .......................... 48

Table 7

- 2. Plant Yates Unit 3 Emissions Baseline For 2013

................................ .......................... 49

Table 7

- 3. Plant Yates Unit 3 Annual Average Emissions Baseline For 2012

- 2013

................... 49

Table 7

- 4. Plant Yates Units 2 and 3, Actual Emissions For 2012

................................ ................ 50

Table 7

- 5. Plant Yates Units 2 and 3, Actual Emissions For 2013

................................ ................ 50

Table 7

- 6. Comparison of Yates Unit 3 actual emission rate and heat input to Acid Rain

averaging p lan alternative NO

x and heat input limits 2012.

................................ ................. 51

Table 7

- 7. Comparison of Yates Unit 3 actual emission rate and heat input to Acid Rain

averaging plan alternative NO

x and heat input limits 2013.

................................ ................. 52

Table 7

- 8. Comparison of Yates Actual Emission Rates for CAIR Allocations 2012.

................. 52

Table 7

- 9. Comparison of Yates Act ual Emission Rates for CAIR Allocations 2013.

................. 53

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

vii LIST of APPENDICES

Appendix A Consumer Products Analysis , and Washer Fluid Emissions Spreadsheet

Appendix B Gasoline Marketing Analysis

Appendix C Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone to NO

x and VOC Emissions in the Atlanta Area , and Spreadsheet of Data f or Sensitivity Analysis

Appendix D SEMAP Sensitivity Study Final Report

Appendix E Diesel Retrofit Documentation

Appendix F Rulemaking Documents

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

viii L IST of A CRONYMS

Acron ym Meaning Acronym Meaning

CAA Clean Air Act MVEB Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget

CAAA Clean Air Act

Amendments NAA Nonattainment Area

CARB California Air Resources

Board NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard

CB

- IV Carbon Bond IV NOx Nitrogen Oxid es

CFFP Clean Fuel Fleet Program NTE Not

- To

- Exceed

CMAQ Community Multi

- scale Air Quality PPB Parts Per Billion

DNR Department of Natural

Resources PPT Parts Per Trillion

DV Design Value RACM Reasonably Achievable Control Measures

EPA Environmental Pr otection Agency RFP Reasonable Further Progress

EPD Environmental Protection

Division RVP Reid Vapor Pressure

ESC European Stationary Cycle SIP State Implementation Plan

FR Federal Register TPD Tons Per Day

FTP Federal Test Procedure VISTAS Visibility Improvement State and Tribal

Association of the Southeast

LEV Low Emission Vehicle

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

1 of 57 

## 1.0 Introduction and Background

This document contains the technical support for the Georgia Environmental Protection Division's (EPD’s) request to modify the Georgia S tat e Implementation Plan (S IP ) by removing the following Georgia rules: Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa), “Consumer and Commercial Products” Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(bbb ), “ Gasoline Marketing ”

This document also contains the analysis for Georgia EPD’s r equest to modify the Georgia SIP by amending Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(mmm), “NO

x Emissions f rom Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity ”.

These rules were included in the Georgia State Implementation Plan to reduce e missions contributing to the nonattainment of the ozone NAAQS in the Atlanta metropolitan area. This section will provide for the history of the Atlanta Ozone Nonattainment Area and the regulatory requirement for

the removal of these rules

.

The analysis contained in this document focus on the impact of the removal and revision of thes rules on ozone and fine particulate matter nonattainment and maintenance areas within the geographic area covered by the rules. These revisions will also not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), carbon monoxide (CO), or lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). There are no nonattainment or maintenance areas in Georgia for

SO 2 , NO 2 , CO, or Pb. All of the SO 2 , NO 2 , CO, and Pb monitors in the affected area are currently measuring levels well below the NAAQS and the these revisions will result in little or no increase in emissions of these pollutants or their precursors. Although U.S. EPA has not complet ed designations

for the 2010 SO 2 NAAQS, these revisions will not increase emissions of SO 2 or its precursors to the

extent that the SO 2 NAAQS will be violated.



### 1.1 The Atlanta Nonattainment Area

1990 1

- Hour Ozone Standard

Pursuant to the Clean Air Act Ame ndments of 1990 (CAAA), the Atlanta area was designated as

nonattainment for the 1

- hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard ( NAAQS ) by U.S. EPA

and was classified as a serious nonattainment area on November 6, 1991. The nonattainment area (NAA) was , at that time, geographically defined as the following 13 Georgia counties : Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Paulding, and

Rockdale.

Because Atlanta failed to attain the 1

- hour ozone NAAQS by N ovember 15, 1999, EPA issued a final rulemaking action in the September 26, 2003, Federal Register (68 FR 55469) determining that, by operation of law, the Atlanta area was being reclassified as a "severe" ozone nonattainment area effective January 1, 2004

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

2 of 57 In addition to having been required to submit state implementation plan (SIP) revisions meeting requirements for marginal, moderate, and serious ozone nonattainment areas, Georgia was required to submit plans meeting the additional requirements for are as classified as s evere. As a result of EPA's implementation of the original federal Clean Air Act of 1970, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Georgia EPD completed, and EPA approved (67 FR 30574), SIP revisions to address the 1

- hour ozone Atlanta NAA.

On February 1, 2005, EPD requested under the CAAA of 1990 that the Atlanta area be redesignated from nonattainment to attainment with respect to the 1

- hour ozone NAAQS. This request was based on three years, 2002 through 2004, of ambient monitoring data at all 11 ozone monitors in the Atlanta NAA showing no violation of the 1

- hour ozone NAAQS; the implementation of permanent and enforceable reductions in ozone precursor emissions; compliance with all applicable

req uirements; and the Atlanta Maintenance Plan with projections demonstrating that the 2002 emission levels in this area will not be exceeded through at least the year 2015. EPD also petitioned EPA to make a determination that the Atlanta area was eligible fo r application of EPA's Clean Data Policy, based on the Atlanta area's attainment of the 1

- hour ozone NAAQS. EPA approved the plan and redesignation request effective June 14, 2005 (70 FR 34660).

1997 and 2008 8

- Hour Ozone Standard s

Georgia EPD submitted its nonattainment area designation recommendations under the 8

- hour ozone standard to EPA on July 15, 2003. Georgia recommended the following 20

- counties be designated

nonattainment for the 8

- hour ozone standard: Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton , Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton. Georgia recommended that Pickens County be excluded from the nonattainment designation even though the county is part of the Atlanta MSA. Georgia based this exclusion, in part, on the fact that the county did not exceed any of the State's criteria for inclusion into a nonattainment area. Other parameters used in the analysis included the county's population and summer day NO

x a nd VOC emissions. EPA concurred with Georgia's recommendations in a letter dated December 3, 2003.

On April 30, 2004, EPA designated 20 metropolitan Atlanta counties as a "marginal" nonattainment

area under the 1997 8

- hour ozone standard. The eight

- hour o zone nonatt ainment area encompasses

the 13

- counties of the former 1

- hour ozone nonattainment area plus seven additional "ring" counties

. These 7

- counties included the counties of Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Hall, Newton, Spalding, and

Walton. With an attainm ent deadline of June15, 2007, marginal areas were required to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the 2006 ozone season. On October 16, 2007, the U.S. EPA published a rulemaking proposing its d etermination that the Atlanta Area did not attain

the 8

- hour ozone NAAQS by June 15, 2007, the applicable attainment date for marginal

nonattainment areas. The proposed finding was based on ambient air quality data from years 2004, 2005, and 2006. The U.S. EPA explained that, consistent with S ection 181(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), when EPA finalizes its determination that the Atlanta a rea failed to attain, and that requirement becomes effective, the Atlanta a rea would be reclassified by operation of law to the next highest classification or “moderate” nonattainment. The "moderate" area attainment date for the Atlanta, Georgia, area would then be "as expeditiously as practicable," but no later than June 15, 2010. The U.S. EPA finalized this finding on March 6, 2008 [73FR 12013

- 12017].

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

3 of 57 The State of Georgia prepared and submitted an ozone attainment demonstration plan for the metro

Atlanta 8

- hour Ozone Nonattainment Area to EPA Region 4 on October 21, 2009. The plan was based on a modeled attainment demonstration performed according to EPA gu idance. The modeling resulted in a single monitor in the Atlanta NAA exceeding the 8

- hour ozone NAAQS (design value of 86 ppb at the Confederate Avenue monitoring site). However, the weight of evidence analysis

demonstrated in Section 6.2 of the October 20 09 plan provides strong evidence that the Atlanta 8

- Hour Ozone NAA would demonstrate attainment of the ozone NAAQS by 2009. The attainment demonstration with the weight of evidence analysis was shown to be effective since the unmonitored area analysis show ed no modeling grid cell greater than 86 ppb.

On June 9, 2010, Georgia EPD submitted a request for a one

- year extension of the attainment date in accordance with 40 CFR 51.907. The Atlanta nonattainment area qualified for an extension because

it had met t he condition specified in 69 FR 23968 in which an area is eligible for the first of the 1

- year extensions if, for the attainment year, the area’s fourth highest daily 8

- hour average is 0.084ppm or less. On November 30, 2010, EPA published a final rule exte nding the attainment date for the Atlanta nonattainment area to June 15, 2011 [75FR 73969

- 73972].

On June 23, 2011, EPA promulgated its determination [76 FR 36873] that the metro Atlanta

nonattainment area had attained the 1997 8

- Hour Ozone NAAQS. This fi nal rule became effective on July 25, 2011. This determination was based upon quality

- assured and certified ambient air monitoring data for the 2008

- 2010 period, which showed design values ranging from 0.068 ppm to 0.080 ppm. With the clean data determina tion, EPA suspended the requirements for the nonattainment area to submit an attainment demonstration, a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, and contingency measures. Because of this, EPD’s attainment demonstration was subsequently withdrawn on April 4, 2012. These requirements are suspended as long as the area continues to attain the standard. On December 15, 2 011, EPA proposed its determination [76 FR 77950] that the metro

Atlanta nonattainment area attained the 1997 8

- hour ozone NAAQS by its applica ble attainment date of June 15, 2011.

Although the Atlanta area attained the 1997 8

- hour ozone standard on June 15, 2011 , in order to formally be redesignated attainment, Georgia EPD was required to submit a maintenance plan

. O n April 4, 2012 Georgia EPD submitted a maintenance plan under the CAAA of 1990 requesting that the Atlanta area be redesignated from nonattainment to attainment based on ambient monitoring data

from 2008

- 2010. It included provisions showing no violation of the 1997 8

- hour ozone NA AQS, the implementation of permanent and enforceable reductions in ozone precursor emissions, compliance with all applicable requirements; and the Atlanta Maintenance Plan with projections demonstrating

that 2008 emissions levels in this area will not be e xceeded through at least the year 2024. EPD also petitioned EPA to make a determination that the Atlanta area was eligible for application of EPA's Clean Data Policy, based on the Atlanta area's attainment of the 1997 8

- hour ozone NAAQS. EPA approved the p lan and redesignation request and promulgated a proposed rule on February 4, 2013 (78 FR 7705), that was published in the federal register as a final rule on December 2, 2013 (78 FR 72040).

On May 21, 2012, EPA published a final rule in the federal regist er designating a new 15

- county Atlanta area marginal nonattainment for the 2008 8

- hour O zone N ational Ambient Air Quality

Standard. The 15

- county area includes the counties of Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dekalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Ful ton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, and Rockdale.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

4 of 57 1997 PM 2.5 Standards

Georgia EPD submitted its nonattainment area designation recommendations under the annual PM 2.5 standard to EPA on February 13, 2004 , and modified those recommendations on June 29 , 2004

. Georgia recommended the following 20

- counties be designated nonattainment for the annual PM 2.5 ozone standard: Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Newton, Pauld ing, Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton. In addition, EPD recommended that a portion of Heard County be included as part of the

nonattainment area. EPA responded to Georgia's recommendations in a letter dated June 29, 2004, with a proposed nonattainment area that included EPD’s recommendation plus Heard and Putnam

Counties

.

On January 5, 2005 , EPA designated 20 metropolitan Atlanta counties plus portion s of Heard and

Putnam Counties as nonattainment area under the 1997 annual PM 2.5 standard.

The State of Ge orgia prepared and submitted a n attainment demonstration plan for the metro Atlanta

annual PM 2.5 Nonattainment Area to EPA Region 4 on July 6

, 20 10 . The plan was based on a modeled attainment demonstration performed according to EPA guidance. The modelin g resulted

attainment of the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS by 2012.

On December 8, 2011 , EPA promulgated its determination [76 FR 76620 ] that the metro Atlanta

nonattainment area had attained the 1997 annual PM 2.5 NAAQS . This determination was based upon quality

- ass ured and certified ambient air monitoring data for the 200 7

- 20 09 period. With the clean

data determination

, EPA suspended the requirements for the nonattainment area to submit an attainment demonstration, RACM, RFP plans, contingency measures and other pl anning SIPs related

to attainment of the 1997 annual PM 2.5 NAAQS . The attainment demonstration was subsequently withdrawn. These requirements are suspended as long as the area continues to attain the standard.

This final rule became effective on January 9 , 2012

.

On August 30 , 2012, EPD requested under CAAA of 1990 that the Atlanta area be redesignated from nonattainment to attainment with respect to the 1997 annual PM 2.5 NAAQS based on ambient monitoring data from 2008

- 2010. This includes provisions sho wing no violation of the 1997 annual

PM 2.5 NAAQS, the implementation of permanent and enforceable reductions in PM 2.5 emissions and

PM 2.5 precursor emissions, compliance with all applicable requirements; and the Atlanta Maintenance Plan with projections de monstrating that 2008 emissions levels in this area will not be exceeded through at least the year 2024. EPD also petitioned EPA to make a determination that the Atlanta area was eligible for application of EPA's Clean Data Policy, based on the Atlanta are a's

attainment of the 1997 annual PM 2.5 NAAQS.



### 1.2 Clean Air Act Provisions

EPA can only propose approval of a SIP revision seeking to discontinue an existing SIP

- approved program if the SIP revision is consistent with the provisions of 110(l) . This secti on , therefore,

consists of a detailed description of those requirements.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

5 of 57 

### 1.3 Section 110(l) Requirement

Section 110(l) of the CAA, governs EPA’s ability to approve all SIP revisions. Specifically, section 110(l) states:

Each revision to an implementatio n plan submitted by a State under this chapter shall be adopted by such State after reasonable notice and public hearing. The Administrator shall not approve a revision of a plan if the revision would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning

at tainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171 of this title), or any other applicable requirement of this chapter.

This SIP revision will demonstrate that the removal of the Georgi a Rules described in Section 1.4

will not interfere w ith attainment, reasonable further progress or any other requirement of the Clean

Air Act

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

6 of 57 

### 1.4 Removal Request

With the submission of this plan r evision, Georgia EPD is requesting the removal o f Georgia Rule

391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa ), “ Consumer and Commercial Pr oducts” and Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)( bbb ),

“Gasoline Marketing ” from Georgia’s SIP ; and the amendment of Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(mmm), “ NO

x Emissions f rom Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity” in Georgia’s SIP

. This document was prepared using the requirements of 110(l)

, which demonstrate this revision will not interfere with attainment and reasonable further

progress, as a basis for the removal of these rules.

In the 2008 8

- hour proposed ozone rule [78 FR 34 184] on June 6, 2013 , EPA stated for marginal areas that, “When Congress amended the CAA in 1990, it anticipated that nonattainment areas with ozone concentrations close to the level of the NAAQS would likely come into attainment within 3 years after desig nation without any additional local planning.” Therefore as a part of the sensitivity demonstration, Georgia EPD has conducted a sensitivity study conducted using part of the

S outh E astern M odeling, A nalysis, and P lanning (SEMAP) project and information fro m a G eorgia

Tech analysis of the sensitivity of ozone concentrations in the Eastern U.S. to reductions in

emissions of both NO

x and VOCs.

Also, since VOC is not a significant precursor for particulate matter 1 , there is no possibility that

removal of the G eorgia Rule ( aaa ) will impact the ambient air quality standard for the PM 2.5 NAAQS

in the Atlanta area or interfere with attainment of the standard.

Additional evidence that the removal of these rules will not interfere with the requirements of 110(l)

can be found in Section 6 of this document

. T he State of Georgia is a NO

x limited area and Section 6

describes the sensitivity of ozone formation in the Atlanta area to reduct ions of NO

x and VOC

emissions.

1 See 40 CFR 51.1002(c)(3)

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

7 of 57 

## 2.0 Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(aaa), Consumer and Commerci al Products

Windshield wiper fluid contains the volatile organic compound (VOC), methyl alcohol which evaporates easily at room temperature from windshield wiper fluid when refilling the fluid storage

tank and when used t o clean automobile windshields.

G eorgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa), “Co nsumer and Commercial Products” or Georgia Rule (aaa) limits the type of windshield washer fluid that can be sold in the original 1

- hour ozone 13

- county
Atlanta nonattainment area. The rule does not allow for the sale o f windshield washer fluid containing more than 8 percent VOCs by weight. Concentrated formulas and fluid designed to work in temperatures below 20 degrees Fahrenheit contain more than 8 percent VOC and retailers are prohibited from selling them. This rul e was implemented prior to the determination that Atlanta is a

NO

x limited area and was never expanded to the surrounding counties

.

Determining compliance with this rule is a time consuming and resource intensive process. It

involves an unannounced visi t of any retail establishment that could possibly sell windshield washer fluid, finding the fluid on the shelves, and noting the product name, manufacturer, and the VOC content of the product. Because the Atlanta area is NO

x limited with very little benef it from reducing VOC emissions, removal of Georgia Rule (aaa) will have negligible effect on air quality

. Therefore,

the cost of enforcing this regulation is significantly out of proportion to the benefit achieved.



### 2.1 Calculations and Emissions

On a nation al level EPA generally considers windshield washer fluid to have a 35 percent VOC

content

. In the Southeast, windshield washer fluid typically has a VOC content of between 8 and 10 percent during the summertime, and 30 percent during the winter months. How ever, Georgia Rule (aaa) limits the VOC content of windshield washer fluid to 8 percent year round. Additional information on assumptions concerning the VOC content of windshield washer fluid can be found in Appendix A.

2.1.1 VOC Emission Differences

By comp aring calculated VOC emissions that are based on a typical VOC content for windshield

washer fluid in the Southeast and VOC emissions for windshield washer fluid with the same VOC

content as required by Georgia Rule (aaa), the VOC difference in the Atlanta area can be used to

evaluate how the removal of the rule will impact ozone monitors in the area. Table 2

- 1 shows a

VOC difference of 0.17 tons/day . This value was calculated using 2010 census data and an EPA per

person usage factor to get the emissions difference for the area. For the purposes of these

calculations summertime is considered ozone season or 244 days during the months of March 1 through October 31

. More details and information on these calculations can be found in Appendix

A.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

8 of 57 

### Tabl e 2

- 1. VOC Emission Difference Due to Georgia Rule (aaa)

County Population

from 2010

Census Data Summer VOC

Emissions based on Typical Southeastern

VOC Content of

Windshield Washer

Fluid

(tons) Georgia

Summer

VOC

Emissions

with Rule In

Place

(tons) Sum mer VOC

Emissions

Difference Due to Georgia Rule (aaa)

(tons) Daily VOC

Emissions

Difference Due to Georgia Rule (aaa)

(tons per day)

Cherokee 214

, 346 10.01338774 8.010710189 2.002677547 0.008207695 Clayton 259

, 424 12.11925158 9.695401267 2.42385031 7 0.009933813

Cobb 688

, 078 32.14425185 25.71540148 6.42885037 0.026347747

Coweta 127

, 317 5.947740972 4.758192778 1.189548194 0.004875198

Dekalb 691

, 893 32.32247339 25.85797871 6.464494678 0.026493831 Douglas 132

, 403 6.185338548 4.948270838 1.23706771 0 .00506995 Fayette 106

, 567 4.978383972 3.982707178 0.995676794 0.004080643 Forsyth 175

, 511 8.199171876 6.559337501 1.639834375 0.006720633

Fulton 920

, 581 43.005862 34.4046896 8.601172399 0.035250707

Gwinnett 805

, 321 37.62137584 30.09710067 7.524275167 0 .030837193 Henry 203

, 922 9.526420152 7.621136122 1.90528403 0.007808541

P aulding 142

, 324 6.648807984 5.319046387 1.329761597 0.005449843

Rockdale 85

, 215 3.98090394 3.184723152 0.796180788 0.003263036

Total 13

- County Area 4,552,902 212.6933698 170.1547 42.53867397 0.17

Note: Please see Appendix A for m ore details on the population data and the VOC content of the washer fluid.

An emissions difference due to Georgia Rule (aaa ) of 0. 17 tons per day has extremely small non

measurable impact on ozone monito rs in the metro area. In order to impact a monitor by even 1 part per billion, the emission diffe rence must be equivalent to at least 15

- 25 tons per day of VOC emissions. Further information on the sensitivity study used in this evaluation and the emissi on offset for the removal of Rule (aaa) can be found in Section s 5 and 6 of this document.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

9 of 57 

## 3.0 Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(bbb ), Gasoline Marketing

Operating motor vehicles that burn gasoline releases sulfur dioxide, NO

x , and VOCs into the air. Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(bbb), “Gasoline Marketing” or Georgia Rule (bbb) was created to ensure the distribution of low sulfur and seasonal low Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) gasoline into the

metro Atlanta ozone nonattainment area and an area of influence outside of the At lanta NAA . This

cleaner

- burning gasoline h elps reduce emissions of ozone precursors, nitrogen oxides (NO

x ), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

, from motor vehicles. The Gasoline Marketing Program's fuel control area encompasses 45 counties (area of infl uence) in and around metro Atlanta. The 45

- county area of influence includes the following counties: Banks, Barrow, Bartow, Butts, Carroll, Chattooga, Cherokee, Clarke, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dawson, Dekalb, Douglas, Fayette, Floyd, Forsyth, Fulton, Gordo n, Gwinnett, Hall, Haralson, Heard, Henry, Jackson, Jasper, Jones, Lamar, Lumpkin, Madison, Meriwether, Monroe

, Morgan, Newton, Oconee, Paulding, Pickens, Pike, Polk, Putnam, Rockdale, Spalding, Troup, Walton, and Upson. The 45

- county area of influence c onsists

of the 20

- county 8

- hour ozone maintenance area for the 1997 ozone NAAQS plus an additional 25 surrounding counties that are attaining the standard

. The program requires a specially blended gasoline (Georgia Gas) to be sold in the area of influence year round with the most stringent requirements occurring during the summer

.

Over the years, the federal conventional gas requirements have changed to be close to or identical to Georgia Gas requirements. This has eliminated the need for a specially blended gasoline in the

Atlanta area . Conventional gasoline is equivalent to Georgia Gas in all ways except for the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) during summer months. Conventional gasoline is restrict ed to an RVP of 10 psi 2 from June 1 to September 15, incl uding a 1 .0 psi waiver for gasoline containing 10% ethanol

. Further details can be found in Appendix B. C onventional gasoline is also required to meet an annual average sulfur content of 30 ppm. EPA recently adopted Tier 3 gasoline standards that reduce

the annual sulfur content limit to 1 0 ppm starting in 2017

. F rom June 1 to September 15 of any year

, Georgia Gas R eid Vapor Pressure (RVP) is restricted to 8 .0 psi or less

. This RVP limit includes a 1.0 psi waiver for gasoline containing 10% ethanol. Ge orgia Gas limits the amount of sulfur to an annual average concentration of 30 parts per million by weight throughout the year , similar to conventional gasoline and less restrictive that Tier 3 gasoline

.

By estimating NO

x and VOC emissions

, first with Geo rgia Rule (bbb) in place and then estimating those same pollutants with the requirements of conventional gas in place, GA EPD can show the impact of eliminating the Georgia Rule (bbb) on NO

x and VOC emissions. This analysis is performed with the Federal S ummer RVP requirement (8.8 psi upper limit for gasoline containing 10% ethanol) retained for 1 3 counties in the original 1

- hr ozone nonattainment area . Emission impacts for both pollutants decrease over time with NO

x impacts eventually disappearing altoget her. Additional details of the modeling and analysis associated with these scenarios can be found in Appendix B.

Georgia Rule (bbb) was required in 45

- county “area of influence” as described above. Georgia EPD conducted several analyses to determine how the switch from Georgia gas to conventional gasoline

2 With removal of the Georgia gasoline requir ements, conventional gasoline will be restricted to an RVP of 7.8 psi (plus up to 1.0 psi ethanol waiver) in the original 13

- county 1

- hr ozone nonattainment area.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

10 of 57 in this 45

- county area will affect several maintenance and nonattainment areas.

To demonstrate that maintaining attainment of the 1997 Ozone NAAQS is not interfered with by switching from Georgia gas t o conventional gasoline, analysis is conducted to evaluate the impact of

this switch on the 20

- county ozone maintenance area for VOC and NO

x .

To demonstrate that attaining and maintaining the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS is not interfered with by switching from Geor gia gas to conventional gasoline, additional analysis is conducted to evaluate the impact of this switch on the 20

- county PM 2.5 maintenance area (plus a small portion of Putnam and Heard counties) for NO

x . No other precursors need investigation since direc t PM 2.5 emissions do not change with RVP and VOCs have been not been determined to be a significant contributor to the

PM 2.5 nonattainment problem (40 CFR Parts 93.119(f)(7) through (10)).

To demonstrate that attaining the 2008 Ozone NAAQS is not interfer ed with by switching from Georgia gas to conventional gasoline, analysis is conducted to evaluate the impact of this switch on

the 15

- county ozone nonattainment area for VOC and NO

x .



### 3.1 Impact of Switching From Georgia Gas to Conventional Gasoline

3.1.1 NO

x Emi ssion Analysis

– Ozone NAAQS

NO

x and VOC emissions were analyzed using MOVES 2010 b to show the change in on

- road

emissions from the switch from Georgia Gas to conventional gasoline. Emissions increases from switching to conventional gasoline are minimal, and continue to decrease into the future. Figure 3

- 1

shows the annual trend for NO

x emission increases.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

11 of 57 0 0.5

1 1.5

2 2.5

3 3.5

4

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040NOx Emissions Increase (tons/day)

Year 

### Annual Trend of NOx Emission Increase From Switch Over
to Conventional Gasoline

NOx 45cnty NOx 20 cnty NAA



### Figure 3

- 1 : Annual Trend of NO

x 

### Emissions Increase From Switch Over to

Conventional Gasoline

The imp act of switching f rom Georgia Ga s to conventional gas in the 20

- county 1997 8

- hour ozone

nonattainment area is that any NO

x emissions increase associated with the switch decrease s steadily

from 1. 32 tons/day in 2013 and then to zero by 2040. If we include the entire 45

- coun ty area subject to Georgia Gas requirements , the N O

x emissions increase is 2.12 tons /day in 2013, dropping to zero by 2040.

Catalytic emission control systems, used on passenger cars since 1975, are the primary method of controlling NO

x emissions from m otor vehicles. Sulfur in gasoline inhibits the emission control performance of catalyst technology. As a result, Georgia EPD established sulfur content limits for gasoline sold in the 45

- county area in Rule (bbb). However, EPA’s Tier 2 gasoline standar d

established requirements for all gasoline sold in the United States starting in 2004. The Tier 2 sulfur requirements are basically the same as Georgia Gasoline . Furthermore, EPA’s Tier 3 fuel standards will require the sale of gasoline with sulfur cont ent even lower than Rule (bbb) requirements starting

in 2017. However, the volatility of the gasoline does impact the combustion process in gasoline engines. T hus the higher RVP allowed in conventional gasoline, compared to Georgia gas, will

result in a very small increase in NO

x emissions in the 45

- county area

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

12 of 57 Table 3

- 1 shows the comparison of the NO

x emissions between Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas

in the different areas and over a variety of years. The year 2008 is used as the first year of the

a nalysis as it is the year of the MVEB for the 2008 RFP SIP and the baseline year in the Atlanta

Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8

- hr Ozone Standard . Addition al years include those used in Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) transportation conformity determinat ion reports (2010, 2016, 2024, 2030, and 2040) and the MVEB year (2024) in the 1997 Atlanta Ozone Maintenance Plan. Because Georgia Gasoline covers the entire 45

- county area

, all 45 counties were used in the analysis for determining the impact of removal o f the rule rather than just the current 15

- county nonattainment

area. Additional d etails can be found in Appendix B

.



### Table 3

- 1. Comparison of On

- Road NO

x Emissions Between Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas

Pollutant and Region Year Georgia Gas Conventio nal

Gas Emissions

Increase with

Conventional

Gas Emissions

Increase with

Conventional

Gas

NO

x tpd tpd tpd %

13

- county NAA 2008

2010

2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 280.50

229.41

174.49

135.45

74.29

70.52

74.76 28 1.85

23 0.47

17 5.20

13 5.90

74. 37

70. 56

74.76 1 .35

1.05

0.72

0.44

0.08

0.04

0.00 0.48

0.46

0.41

0 .33

0. 11

0. 06

0.00

7

- county area 2008

2010

2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 86.71

69.29

50.59

36.12

24.82

22.68

24.73 87. 65

70.05

51.1 9

36. 55

24. 90

22.71

24.73 0. 94

0. 76

0. 60

0. 42

0.0 8

0.03

0.00 1.09

1.09

1.1 9

1.18

0. 32

0.1 5

0.00

20

- county NAA 2008

2010

2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 367.21

298.70

225.08

171.57

99.11

93.19

99.49 3 69.50

30 0.51

22 6.39

17 2.44

99. 27

93. 27

99.49 2. 30

1. 81

1. 32

0. 87

0.1 6

0.0 8

0.00 0.63

0.61

0.58

0.51

0. 17

0. 08

0.00

25

- county area no t in NAA * 2008

2010

2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 11 8.62

95.75

6 9.74

4 9.57

3 4.00

3 1.11

3 4.46 1 19.90

9 6.77

70.54

50.13

3 4.10

3 1.14

3 4.46 1.2 8

1.0 2

0. 80

0.5 6

0.10

0.04

0.00 1.0 8

1.0 6

1.15

1.13

0.29

0.12

0.00

45

- county Marketing

Rule Area 2008

2010

2013

2016

20 24

2030

2040 48 5.82

39 4.45

294. 82

22 1.14

13 3.11

12 4.30

13 3.95 4 89.40

39 7.28

296. 94

22 2.57

13 3.37

12 4.41

13 3.95 3.5 8

2.8 3

2. 12

1.4 3

0.2 6

0.11

0.00 0.74

0.72

0.72

0.64

0. 20

0. 09

0.00

*Note: 45

- county area is the 20

- county nonattainment area with an additi onal 25

- counties that are not nonattainment included to complete the Georgia Marketing Rule geographic area . Th is refers to emissions from those additional counties

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

13 of 57 3.1.2 VOC Emissions Analysis

– Ozone NAAQS

VOC emissions were a lso a nalyzed using MOVES 2010 b to show the change in on

- road emissions from the switch to conventional gasoline. Figure 3

- 2 shows a trend similar to that of the NO

x emission s where emission increases from switching to conventional gasoline are minimal, and

continue to decrease into t he future. For VOCs, the impacts are greater than NO

x as can be seen in the Figure 3

- 2 and Table 3

- 2 because VOC emissions, unlike NO

x , are not only associated with combustion, but also evaporative emissions which are directly linked to RVP. Even in this c ase, the impacts would have been greater if emissions controls were not in place in on

- road motor vehicles to handle volatility

. As more aged vehicles are repla ced with newer cleaner vehicles that have improved evaporative controls, the difference in VOC emissions between Georgia gasoline and conventional gasoline decreases over time (see Figure 3

- 2 and Table 3

- 2 ). The basis for the years

illustrated in Table 3

- 2 are described in Section 3.1.1 as well as the reason for assessing the trends and magnitude of emission impact for the entire 45 county area.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040VOC Emissions Increase (tons/day)

Year 

### Annual Trend of VOC Emission Increase From Switch Over
to Conventional Gasoline

VOC 45 cnty VOC 20 cnty NAA



### Figure 3

- 2 : Annual Trend VOC Emissions Increase From Switch Over to Conventional

Gasoline

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

14 of 57 VOC emission increases associated with the switch from Georgia Ga s to conventional g as in the 20

- county nonattainment area dec rease from 3.3 5 tons/day in 2013 to approximately 1.16 ton/day in

2040. If we include the 45

- county area of influence, the VOC emission increase is still only 5.66 tons/day in 2013 decreasing to 1.94 tons/day in 2040. Table 3

- 2 shows the difference in emissions

between the use of Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas in the different areas.



### Table 3

- 2

. Comparison of On

- Road VOC Emissions Between Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas

Pollutant and Region Year Georgia Gas Conventional Gas Emissions

Increase with

Conventional

Gas Emissions

Increase with

Conventional

Gas

VOC tpd tpd tpd %

13

- county NAA 2008

2010

2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 132.57

109.58

83.76

66.48

47.54

46.05

50.37 13 4.84

11 1.60

8 5.34

6 7.58

4 8.20

4 6.60

5 0 .95 2.27

2.02

1.58

1.10

0.66

0.55

0.58 1.72

1.84

1.89

1.65

1.39

1.19

1.15

7

- county area 2008

2010

2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 38.74

32.44

26.63

21.45

13.96

13.30

15.03 41.07

34.52

28.40

22.74

14.61

13.82

15.61 2.34

2.08

1.77

1.30

0.65

0.53

0.58 6.04

6.41

6.64

6.05

4.65

3.95

3.85

20

- county NAA 2008

2010

2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 171.30

142.02

110.39

87.93

61.50

59.35

65.40 1 75.91

14 6.12

11 3.74

90.32

6 2.82

6 0.42

6 6.56 4.61

4.10

3.35

2.39

1.31

1.07

1. 16 2.69

2.89

3.03

2.72

2.13

1.80

1.77

25

- county area not in NAA 2008

2010

2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 50.54

4 1.71

33. 98

2 7.12

1 7.58

16. 89

1 9.26 5 3.67

4 4.45

3 6.29

2 8.81

1 8.42

1 7.59

20.04 3. 13

2. 73

2. 31

1.6 9

0. 84

0. 70

0.7 8 6. 19

6. 55

6. 80

6. 23

4. 78

4.15

4.06

45

- county Marketing

Rule Area 2008

2010

2013

2016

20 24

2030

2040 22 1.84

18 3.74

14 4.37

11 5.04

7 9.08

7 6.24

8 4.66 2 29.59

1 90.57

1 50.03

1 19.13

8 1.24

7 8.01

86.60 7.74

6.83

5. 66

4.08

2.15

1.77

1. 94 3.49

3.72

3.92

3.55

2.72

2.33

2.29

*Note: 45

- county area is the 20

- county nonattainment area with an additional 2 5

- counties that are not nonattainment included to complete the Georgia Marketing Rule geographic area . Th is refers to emissions from those additional counties

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

15 of 57 3.1.3 NO

x Emission Analysis

- PM 2.5 NAAQS

NO

x is regulated as a precursor to PM 2.5 and the Atlanta a rea is currently designated nonattainment

for the 1997 annual PM 2.5 NAAQS. Therefore, the increase in on

- road NO

x emissions in the current

Atlanta PM 2.5 nonattainment area that will result from the switch from Georgia Gas to conventional gasoline w as det ermined using MOVES 2010 b . Emissions increases from switching to conventional gasoline are minimal, and continue to decrease into the future. Figure 3

- 3 shows the annual trend for

NO

x emission increases. The impact seen here is even smaller than the case with ozone because

PM 2.5 NAAQS is an annual standard with annualized emissions where RVP between Georgia gasoline and conventional gasoline are identical for over 2/3 of the year (the annual, year

- round sulfur requirements for conventional gas and Georgia gasoline are the same). Direct PM 2.5 is not impacted at all by volatility with the impact of RVP change on PM 2.5 direct emissions being zero. This has been confirmed by MOVES modeling . For further details see Appendix B

.

0.0 0.5 1.0

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040NOx Emissions Increase (tons/day)

Year 

### Annual Trend of PM2.5 NOx Emission Increase From Switch
Over to Conventional Gasoline in the Atlanta PM 2.5 

### Nonattainment Area

20 cnty NAA*



### Figure 3

- 3: Annual Trend of PM2.5 NO

x 

### Emissions Increase From Switch Over To

Conventional Gasoline in the Atlanta PM 2.5 

### Nonattainment Area

Figure 3

- 3 also includes emissions form a portion of Putnam County that is part of the Atlanta PM 2.5 nonattainment a rea

. The portion of Heard C ounty that is part of the Atlanta PM 2.5 nonattainment area does not have regular public vehicular traffic

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

16 of 57 The impact of switching from Georgia Gas to conventional gas in the 1997 annual PM 2.5 nonattainment area is that any N O

x emissions increase associated with the switch decreases steadily

from only 0.28 tons/day in 2016 to zero by 2040. Table 3

- 3 shows the comparison of the NO

x emissions between Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas in the different areas. The years illustrated in Table 3.3 were chosen for similar reasons described in Section 3.1.1 except that 2008 is the baseline year in the submitted 1997 PM 2.5 Atlanta Maintenance Plan and 2024 is the MVEB year in the Plan.



### Table 3

- 3

. Comparison of On

- Road NO

x Emissions Be tween Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas

*Small portion of Putnam C ounty is considered in maintenance along with 20 full counties for the 1997 PM 2.5 annual NAAQS standard

Pollutant and Region Year Georgia Gas Conventional Gas Emissions Emissions

Increase with Increase with

Conventional

Gas Conventional Gas

NO
x tpd tpd tpd P ercent

2008 2 97.19 29 7.64 0.44 0.1 5

13

- county 2016 144.72 14 4.86 0.14 0.10

2024 79.14 79.17 0.03 0.03

2030 74.99 75.0 1 0.01 0.02

2040 79.27 79.27 0.00 0.00

2008 82.85 83. 13 0.28 0.33

7

- county 2016 36.80 36.9 4 0.13 0.36

2024 23.62 23.64 0.02 0. 10

203 0 21.28 21.29 0.01 0.04

2040 22.77 22.77 0.00 0.00

2008 0.41 0.41 0.002 0.41

2016 0.19 0.19 0.001 0.34

Putnam 2024 0.09 0.09 0.000 0.12

in NAA* 2030 0.07 0.07 0.000 0.05

2040 0.06 0.06 0.000 0.00

2008 380.45 381. 1 8 0.72 0.19

20

- county 2 016 181.71 18 1.9 9 0.28 0.15

NAA 2024 102.84 102. 89 0.05 0.0 5

and Putnam* 2030 96.34 96.37 0.02 0.02

2040 102.11 102.11 0.00 0.00

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

17 of 57 In the Final Redesignation of the Rome, Georgia

, Nonattainment Area for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter to Attainment on May 14, 2014 [79 FR 27493 through 27496], EPA agrees that repealing Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(bbb) entitled “ Gasol ine Marketing.'' is expected to result in a

minimal emission increase and unlikely to interfere the attainment of the PM 2.5 air quality standard.

“ Subsequent to publication of the proposed rule, GA EPD notified EPA that the Georgia

Board of Natural Resour ces

... had repealed Georgia Rule 391

– 3

– 1

– .02(2)(bbb) entitled

‘‘Gasoline Marketing. ”... ’ The Gasoline Marketing rule, enacted to improve ozone levels in the Atlanta Area, required that fuel sold in the Atlanta ozone nonattainment area and in areas

determined to have contributed to ozone levels in the nonattainment area contain reduced sulfur and have a reduced Reid Vapor Pressure. This rule applied to fuel sold in the Rome Area, and the projected mobile source emissions in GA EPD’s maintenance plan assumed

con tinued implementation of the rule through the maintenance period. GA EPD has subsequently provided calculations to EPA demonstrating that the repeal of the Gasoline Marketing rule increases the on

- road NO

x emissions projected for 2023 in the Rome Area by

a pproximately 3 tons per year (tpy) and does not change the projected emissions of SO2 or

direct PM 2.5 .”

“EPA has concluded that the changes to the aforementioned rules do not affect the Agency’s decision to approve the redesignation request and maintenan ce plan for the Rome Area. Any increase in emissions that may result from these modifications is expected to be minimal and well within the margin necessary to maintain attainment of the 1997 Annual PM 2.5 standard.”

EPA has also agreed with this assessment for the Final Redesignation of the Macon, Georgia

Nonattainment Area for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter to Attai nment also, dated May 13,

2014 [79 FR 27194 through 27196 ].

This document demonstrates that EPA’s conclusions that repeal of Georgia rule (bbb) is unlikely to

interfere with attainment and maintenance of the PM 2.5 air quality standard in the Rome and Macon

nonattainment areas also hold true for the Atlanta PM 2.5 nonattainment area.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

18 of 57 

### 3.2 Emissions Compared to Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets

It is import ant to evaluate on

- road NO

x and VOC emissions from both Georgia Gas and c onventional gasoline to show that the removal of the Georgia Rule (bbb) will not affect transportation conformity

. Motor vehicle emission budgets provide limitations of o n

- road mobile emissions, vital to assuring that future emissions from mobile sources will not interfere with the region’s ability to attain a NAAQS standard (PM2.5 and ozone most specifically in this case), demonstrate rate of progress, or maintain polluta nt levels below the standard. Here it is shown how removal of the Georgia Rule (bbb) does not require any changes to the motor vehicle emissions budgets nor interferes with transportation planning’s ability to continue to demonstrate conformity w ith the SI P budgets in place.

3.2.1 NO

x and VOC Emissions Analysis

– Ozone NAAQS

Figure 3

- 4 shows the NO

x emissions for both Georgia Gas and conventional gas and how the

emis sions relate to the 2008 and 2024 MVEBs in Georgia’s Redesignation Request and Maintenance

Plan for the Atlanta 1997 8

- hour Ozone Nonattainment Area [78 FR 72040]. T he difference in the two lines is nearly indistinguishable showing how Georgia Marketing Rule removal will not significantly affect these trends or the magnitude of emissions.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

19 of 57 50 100 150 200 250 300

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040NOx Emissions (tons/day)

Year NOx On

- Road Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and Conventional Gasoline Versus 2008 & 2024 Ozone
NAAQS MVEBs

NOx Inventory-Georgia Gas 20 cnty NAA

NOx Inventory-Conventional Gas 20 cnty NAA

2008 Atlanta RFP SIP NOx MVEB

2024 Maintenance Plan NOx MVEB



### Figure 3

- 4 : NO

x 

### Emissions : Comparison of Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas to Baselines and Budgets for the 1997 Ozone Maintenance Plan NAAQS

The green line describing the 2024 NO

x MVEB for the 1997 8

- hour Ozone Maintenance Plan ( 202 4

Maintenance Plan NOx MVEB for short on Figure 3

- 4 ) begins at 2024 because this budget only applies from 2024 onward in the m aintenance p lan

. The emissions from Georgia Gas and conventional gasoline are compared in this graph to the motor vehicle emission s budgets (MVEBs) to show that the removal of the Georgia Marketing Rule clearly does not impact Atlanta’s ability to keep NO

x emissions below requirements. The dashed line represents the 2008 Atlanta RFP budget

for NO

x in Georgia’s 15% Reasonable Furthe r Progress State Implementation Plan Revis ion for the

Atlanta 8

- hour Ozone Nonattainment A rea [ 7 8 FR 65877]

.

In both the Georgia Gas and conventional gas cases the NO

x and VOC emissions af ter 2012 are well

below the 2008 MVEB while emissions from 2024

- 2040 never exceed the 2024 MVEB

. Table 3

- 4

shows the NO

x emissions for both types of gasoline in comparison to the two MVEBs.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

20 of 57

Table 3

- 4

. Comparison of NO

x On

- Road Emissions With Conventional Gas Versus 1997 Ozone NAAQS Maintenance Plan MVEBs

Year 2008 RFP MVEB (tons/day) 2024 Maintenance Plan

SIP MVEB (tons/day) Conventional Gas

Emissions (tons/day)

2013 272.67 N/A 226.39

2016 272.67 N/A 172.44

2024 272.67 126 99.27

2030 272.67 126 93.27

2040 272.67 126 99.49

A similar compariso n can be ma de for VOC emissions. Figure 3

- 5 shows that comparison using both

G eorgia Gas and conventional g as and how the emissions relate to the 200 8 and 2024 MVEBs.



### 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040VOC Emissions (tons/day)



### Year VOC On

- Road Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and Conventional Gasoline Versus 2008 &
2024 Ozone NAAQS MVEBs

VOC Inventory-Georgia Gas 20 cnty NAA

VOC Inventory-Conventional Gas 20 cnty NAA

2008 Atlanta RFP SIP NOx MVEB

2024 Maintenance Plan VOC MVEB



### Figure 3

- 5 : VOC Emissions: Comparison of Georgia Gas and Convention al Gas to Baselines and Budgets

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

21 of 57 Similar to NO

x , the difference in the two lines for VOC is also extremely small showing how the removal of the Georgia Marketing Rule will not significantly affect these trends or the magnitude of

emissions.

The green li ne describing the 2024 MVEB for VOC begins at 2024 because this budget only applies

from 2024 onward as also shown in the Atlanta 1997 8

- hour Ozone Maintenance Plan [ 78 FR

72040 ] . The emissions from Georgia Gas and conventional gasoline are compared in th is graph to the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) to show that the removal of the Georgia Marketing Rule clearly does not impact Atlanta’s ability to keep VOC emissions below requirements. The dashed line represents the 2008 Atlanta RFP budget for VOC in Georgia’s 15% Reasonable Further Progress State Implementation Plan Revision for the Atlanta 8

- hour Ozone Nonattainment Area [ 78

FR 65877 ]

.

In both the Georgia Gas and conventional gas cases the NO

x and VOC emissions after 2012 are well

below the 2008 MVEB while emissions from 2024

- 2040 never exceed the 2024 ozone m aintenance plan MVEB. Table 3

- 5 shows the VOC emissions for conventional gasoline in comparison to the

two MVEBs.



### Table 3

- 5

. Comparison of VOC On

- Road Emissions With Conventional Ga s Versus MVEBs

Year 2008 RFP MVEB (tons/day) 2024 Maintenance Plan

SIP MVEB (tons/day) Conventional Gas

Emissions (tons/day)

2013 171.83 N/A 113.74

2016 171.83 N/A 90.32

2024 171.83 92 62.82

2030 171.83 92 60.42

2040 171.83 92 66.56

3.2.2 NO

x Emissions Analysis

- PM 2.5 NAAQS

Figure 3

- 6 shows the NO

x emissions for both Georgia Gas and conventional gas and how the

emissions relate to the 200 2 baseline and 2024 NO

x MVEB for the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS Maintenance

Plan . The difference in the two lines is nearly i ndistinguishable showing how Georgia Marketing Rule removal will not significantly affect these trends or the magnitude of emissions. The 2002 baseline year (applied to 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS) is used here since there is no MVEB before 2024

and this is the value that emissions are compared to when conducting transportation conformity determinations for model years before 2024 (once the PM2.5 Maintenance Plan is approved, until then every year is compared to 2002 through the “baseline year interim emissions test” established in the transportation conformity final rule (69 FR 40004) ).

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

22 of 57 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040NOx Emissions (tons/day)

Year NOx On

- Road Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and Conventional Gasoline Versus 2002 Baseline &

2024 PM 2.5 NAAQS MVEB

PM NOx Inventory-Georgia Gas

PM NOx Inventory-Conventional Gasoline

2002 PM NOx Baseline

2024 Maintenance Plan PM NOx MVEB



### Figure 3

- 6: NO

x 

### Emissions: Comparison of Georgia Gas and Conventional Gas to Baselines and Budgets for the 1997 PM 2.5 

### NAAQS Maintenance Plan

I n Georg ia’s Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the Atlanta 1997 Annual PM 2.5 Nonattainment Area

, submitted to EPA on August 30, 2012, the 2024 MVEB for NO

x also begins at 2024 because this budget only applies from 2024 onward

. NO

x is the only polluta nt listed because it is the only significant PM 2.5 precursor impacted by the removal of the Georgia Gas rule or volatility.

D irect PM 2.5 is not impacted by volatility

. This MVEB is represented in Figure 3

- 6 by a green line. The emissions from Georgia Gas and conventional gasoline are compared in this graph to the MVEBs to show that the removal of the Georgia Marketing Rule and waiver of the RVP rule clearly does not impact Atlanta’s ability to keep NO

x emissions below these requirements. The dashed line represents the 2002 emissions baseline.

In both the Georgia Gas and conventional gas cases the NO

x emissions are well below the 2002

baseline while emissions from 2024

- 2040 never exceed the 2024 PM 2.5 maintenance plan MVEB.

Table 3

- 6 shows the NO

x emi ssions for both types of gasoline in comparison to the two MVEBs.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

23 of 57 Table 3

- 6. Comparison of NO

x On

- Road Emissions With Conventional Gas Versus 1997

PM 2.5 NAAQS Maintenance Plan MVEBs

Year 2002 Baseline Emissions (tons/day) 2024 Maintenance Plan

S IP MVEB (tons/day) Conventional Gas

Emissions (tons/day)

2016 432.85 N/A 181.99

2024 432.85 121.72 102.89

2030 432.85 121.72 96.37

2040 432.85 121.72 102.11



### 3.3 15

- County Analysis

As presented above in greater detail in Section 1.0, t he Atlanta area wa s designated nonattainment in

1991 for 13

- counties for the 1990 1

- hour ozone standard : Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Paulding , and Rockdale. On Ap ril 30, 2004, EPA designated a 20

- county nonat tainment area under the 1997 8

- hour ozone standard. The eight

- hour ozone nonatt ainment area encompasses the 13

- counties of the former 1

- hour ozone nonattainment area plus seven additional "ring" counties . These 7

- counties included the counties of
Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Hall, Newton, Spalding, and Walton.

On May 21, 2012, EPA published a final rule in the federal register designating a new 15

- county Atlanta area marginal nonattainment for the 2008 8

- hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality

Standard. The 15

- county area includes the counties of Bartow, C herokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dekalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, and Rockdale.

Georgia Rule (bbb) covered the 20

- county nonattainment area plus an additional 25 counties to be

called the 45

- county area of influence.

In order to show that the new 15

- county marginal non

- attainment area will not be affected by the

removal of the Gasoline Marketing Rule, NO

x and VOC emissions were analyzed in the same

manner as in t he 20

- county and 45

- county areas to show the change in emissions from the switch to conventional gasoline. Emissions increases from switching to conventional gasoline are minimal,

and continue to decrease into the future.

3.3.1 15

- County NO

x Emissions Analys is

Figure 3

- 7 shows the annual trend for NO

x emission increases.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

24 of 57 0.0 0.5 1.0

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040NOx Emissions Increase (tons/day)

Year 

### Annual Trend of NOx Emission Increase From Switch Over to
Conventional Gasoline

NOx 15 cnty NAA



### Figure 3

- 7 : NO

x 

### Emissions Increase Trends Associated With Switch to Conventional

Gasoline

As shown in Table 3

- 7 , replacing Georgia Gasoline with Conventiona l Gasoline in the new 15

- county NAA results in only ~ 0.80 tons/day increase in NO

x emissions in 2013 decreasing to 0. 1 1 tons/day by 2024 and zero by 2040.

Table 3

- 7

. Comparison of On

- Road NO

x Emissions Between Georgia Gas and Conventional

Gas

Pollutan t and Region Year Georgia Gas Conventional Gas Emissions Increase

with Conventional Gas Emissions

Increase with

Conventional

Gas

NO

x tpd tpd tpd %

15

- county 2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 191.55

147.49

83.06

78.67

83.79 192.38

148.13

83.17

78.73

83.79 0.82

0.64

0.11

0.05

0.00 0.43

0.43

0.13

0.07

0.00

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

25 of 57 3.3.1 15

- County VOC Emissions Analysis

A similar comparison can be made for VOC emissions. The trend for VOC emission increases, associated with the switch from Georgia Gas to conventional gas in the 20

- county no nattainment area, also decreases as shown in Figure 3

- 8

.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040VOC Emissions Increase (tons/day)

Year 

### Annual Trend of VOC Emission Increase From Switch Over to
Conventional Gasoline

VOC 15 cnty NAA



### Figure 3

- 8 : VOC Emissions Increase Trends Associated With Switch to Conventional

Gasoline

Table 3

- 8 shows the VOC emissions, associated with the switch from Georgia Gas to conventional

gas in the new 15 county NAA results in 2.31 tons/day increase in VOC emissions in 2 013 decreasing to 0.86 ton s /day b y 2024, continuing through 2040 to 0.75 tons/day.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

26 of 57 Table 3

- 8

. Comparison of On

- Road VOC Emissions Between Georgi a Gas and

Conventional Gas

Pollutant and Region Year Georgia Gas Conventional Gas Emissions Increase

with Conventional Gas Emissions

Increase with

Conventional

Gas

VOC tpd tpd tpd %

15

- county 2013

2016

2024

2030

2040 91.80

72.89

51.79

50.12

54.99 94. 11

74.56

52.65

50.83

55.75 2.31

1.67

0.86

0.71

0.75 2.52

2.29

1.65

1.41

1.37



### 3.4 Attainment Inventory Comparison

In Georgia’s April 4, 2012 , submittal of the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the

1997 8

- hour Ozone Standard, Table 3

- 13 shows th e consolidated emissions projections of all metro

Atlanta sources from 2008 to 2024. The approved 1997 plan [78 FR 72040] demonstrated that that

future NO

x and VOC emissions through 2024, or the maintenance inventory, remained well below

the emission leve ls calculated in 2008, the attainment inventory year.

Also, in Georgia’s August 30, 2012, submittal of the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan

for the 1997 PM 2.5 Standard, Table 3

- 15 shows the consolidated emissions projections of all metro

Atlanta sources from 2008 to 2024. The plan demonstrated that future NO

x emissions through 2024, the maintenance inventory, remained well below the emission levels calculated in 2008, the attainment inventory year. Again direct PM is not impacted by RVP or sulfu r content.

A comparison of the attainment inventory with the emissions that result from the removal of the Gasoline Marketing Rule has been made and confirm s that conventional gas emissions remai n s below those in the a ttainment inventory just as in the c ase with Georgia gas. If current and future emissions of precursors to NAAQS pollutants are shown to be below the emission levels determined the year the Atlanta region attained the standard, then the Atlanta region will continue pollutant

concentration le vels below the 1997 ozone and PM 2.5 standards.

3.4.1 Total NO

x Emissions and the 2008 Attainment Inventory

Figure 3

- 9 shows that there is no discernable difference in the total NO

x emissions inventory between Georgia Gasoline and conventional gaso line; and co mpared to the 2008 attainment inventory, both stay well below

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

27 of 57 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030NOx Emissions (tons/day)

Year NOx Total Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and Conventional Gasoline Total Inventory vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

Total Inventory Georgia Gasoline

Total Inventory Conventional Gas

Total 2008 Attainment Inventory

Figure 3

- 9 : Comparison of Total NO

x Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and Conventional Gasoline vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

Table 3

- 9 shows the difference between the total NO

x emissions inventory for both Georgia Gas and for conventional gasoline. By calculating this diff erence, a margin of safety is demonstrated well below the attainment inventory . This margin is the difference between actual emissions and the level at which an increase in emissions could indicate a scenario where the area could fall into possible

nonattainment with the 1997 8

- hour ozone standard

. A large margin indicates that emissions are well below a level where there would be any con cern over maintaining criteria pollutant concentration levels below the NAAQS in a maintenance area.

Table 3

- 9

. 2008 Ozone NAA Inventory Comparison to Georgia Gas Margin and Conventional Gas Margin

Year Total 2008

NO

x Attainment Inventory Total NO

x Emis sions Inventory with Georgia Gasoline Total NO

x Emissions Inventory with

Conventional Gasoline Georgia Gas Margin

(NO

x ) Conventional Gas Margin

(NO

x ) tpd tpd tpd t pd tpd

2010

2013

2014

2016

2017

2020

2024

2030 606.78

606.78

606.78

606.78

606.78

606.7 8

606.78

606.78 564.39

500.80

479.60

437.21

416.01

367.67

303.19

206.47 566.20

502.11

480.77

438.07

416.84

368.40

303.35

206.55 42.39

105.98

127.18

169.57

190.77

239.11

303.59

400.31 40.58

104.67

126.01

168.71

189.94

238.38

303.43

400.23

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

28 of 57 A comparison of t he attainment inventory with the emissions that result from the removal of the Gasoline Marketing Rule, confirm that conventional gas emissions remain below those in the attainment inventory. After calculating the margin for both Georgia Gas and conventi onal gas, it is important to evaluate the amount of the margin allotted to the removal of the Gasoline Marketing Rule and more specifically the switch to conventional gasoline. In Table 3

- 10 , the increase in emissions with Gasoline Marketing rul e removal is 0.16 tons/day or just 0.054 % of the margin in

2024

.

Table 3

- 10

. Margin Allotted to Conventional Gasoline

Year Georgia

Gas Margin (NO

x ) Conventional Gas Margin

(NO

x ) Amount of Margin

Allotted to Switch to

Conventional

Gasoline % of Margin

Allotted to Switch to

Conventional

Gasoline tpd tpd t pd %

2010

2013

2014

2016

2017

2020

2024

2030 42.39

105.98

127.18

169.57

190.77

239.11

303.59

400.31 40.58

104.81

126.18

168.93

190.16

238.57

303.46

400.24 1.81

1.32

1.17

0.87

0.83

0.73

0.16

0.08 4.27

1.24

0.92

0 .51

0.43

0.30

0.05

0.02

3.4.2 Total VOC Emissions and the 2008 Attainment Inventory

Figure 3

- 10 below shows a slight difference in the total VOC emissions inventory between Georgia Gasoline and conventional gasoline compared to the 2008 attainment inventory , however, just as in

the case of total VOC emissions inventory, both stay well below the 2008 attainment inventory.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

29 of 57 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030VOC Emissions (tons/day)

Year VOC Total Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and Conventional Gasoline Total Inventory vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

Total Inventory Georgia Gasoline

Total Inventory Conventional Gas

Total 2008 Attainment Inventory



### Figure 3

- 10 : Comparison of Total VOC Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and

Conventional Gasoline vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

Table 3

- 11 shows the difference between the total VOC emissions inventory for both Georgia Gas and for conventional gasoline and the calculation results used to determine the margin for both Georgia Gas and conventional gas. In both cases, the margins increase beginning in 2010 through to the year 2040.



### Table 3

- 11

. Georgia Gas Margin and Conventional Gas Margin

Year Total 2008

VOC

Attainment Inventory Total VOC Emissions Inventory with Georgia

Gasoline Total VOC Emissions

Inventor y with Conventional

Gasoline Georgia Gas Margin

(VOC) Conventional Gas Margin

(VOC) tpd tpd tpd tpd tpd

2010

2013

2014

2016

2017

2020

2024

2030 491.82

491.82

491.82

491.82

491.82

491.82

491.82

491.82 481.47

465.94

460.76

450.41

445.23

440.23

433.35

423.03 485.57

469.29

463.79

452.80

447.60

442.57

434.66

424.10 10.35

25.88

31.06

41.41

46.59

51.59

58.47

68.79 6.25

22.53

28.03

39.02

44.22

49.25

57.16

67.72

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

30 of 57 A comparison of the attainment inventory with the emissions that result from the removal of t he Gasoline Marketing Rule, confirm that conventional gas emissions remain below those in the attainment inventory. After calculating the margin for both Georgia Gas and conventional gas, the margin allotted to the switch to conventional gasoline is show n in Table 3

- 12

, at 1.31 tons/day or just

2.24 % of the margin in 2024

.



### Table 3

- 12

. Margin Allotted to Conventional Gasoline

Year Georgia Gas Margin (VOC) Conventional Gas Margin (VOC) Amount of Margin Allotted to

Switch to Conventional

Gasoline % of Ma rgin Allotted to

Switch to Conventional

Gasoline tpd tpd tpd %

2010

2013

2014

2016

2017

2020

2024

2030 10.35

25.88

31.06

41.41

46.59

51.59

58.47

68.79 6.25

22.53

28.03

39.02

44.25

49.25

57.16

67.72 4.10

3.35

3.03

2.39

2.37

2.34

1.31

1.07 39. 57

12.93

9.7 6

5.77

5.08

4.54

2.24

1.56

3.4.3 Total NO

x Emissions and the 2008 Attainment Inventory

Figure 3

- 11 shows that there is no discernable difference in the total NO

x emissions inventory between Georgia Gasoline and conventional gasoline; and compared to the 2008 attainment inventory, both stay well below.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

31 of 57 50 150 250 350 450 550 650 750 850

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040NOx Emissions (tons/day)

Year PM2.5 NOx On

- Road Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and Conventional Gasoline Total Inventory vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

Total Inventory Georgia Gasoline Total Inventory Conventional Gas

Total 2008 Attainment Inventory



### Figure 3

- 11: Comparison of Total NO

x 

### Emissions Inventory: Georgia Gasoline and Conventional Gasoline vs. 2008 Attainment Inventory

Table 3

- 13 shows the difference between the tota l NO

x emissions inventory for both Georgia Gas and for conventional gasoline and resulting safety margins . By demonstrating that the margin of safety is well below the attainment inventory for both scenarios, the removal of Georgia Rule (bbb) is shown

not to impact the ability of Atlanta to remain below the 1997 annual NAAQS standard for PM 2.5

. This safety margin is the difference between forecasted actual emissions and the level (attainment emission level or “overall attainment inventory”) at which an in crease in emissions could indicate a scenario where the area could fall into possible nonattainment with the 1997 annual PM 2.5 standard. The year 2008 is being used here for PM2.5 (in lieu of 2002) because it represents when Atlanta

attained the 1997 PM2. 5 standard based on ambient monitoring, and overall emissions levels (all sectors, not just on

- road where the baseline year of 2002 or MVEBs matter most) that year make up the “attainment inventory”.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

32 of 57 Table 3

- 13. 1997 PM 2.5 NAA Inventory Comparison to Georgia Gas Margin and Conventional Gas Margin

Year Total 2008

NO

x Attainment Inventory Total NO

x Emissions Inventory with Georgia Gasoline Total NO

x Emissions Inventory with

Conventional Gasoline Georgia Gas Margin Conventional Gas Margin

tpd tpd tpd tpd tpd

2014

2016

2017

2020

2024

2030 743.92

743.92

743.92

743.92

743.92

743.92 539.48

471.44

437.42

391.43

330.22

238.40 539.80

471.72

437.68

391.66

330.27

238.44 204.44

272.48

306.50

352.49

413.70

505.52 204.12

272.20

306.24

352.26

413.65

505.48

A comparison of the attainment inventory with the emissions that result from the removal of the Gasoline Marketing Rule, confirm that conventional gas emissions remain below those in the attainment inventory. After calculating the margin for both Georgia Gas and conventional gas, it is important to evaluate the amount of the margin allotted to the removal of the Gasoline Marketing Rule and more specifically the switch to conventional gasoline. In Table 3

- 14 , the increase in

emissions with Gasoline Marketi ng rule removal is 0.0 5 tons/day or just 0. 0 1% of the margin in

2024. As with Table 3

- 3 a small portion of Putnam C ounty is considered in this non

- attainment area along with 20 full counties for the 1997 PM2.5 annual NAAQS standard.



### Table 3

- 14. Margin Al lotted to Conventional Gasoline

Year Georgia

Gas Margin Conventional Gas Margin Amount of Margin

Allotted to Switch to

Conventional

Gasoline % of Margin

Allotted to Switch to

Conventional

Gasoline

tpd tpd tpd %

2014

2016

2017

2020

2024

2030 204.44

272. 48

306.50

352.49

413.70

505.52 204.12

272.20

306.24

352.26

413.65

505.48 0.32

0.28

0.26

0.23

0.05

0.04 0.15

0.10

0.08

0.07

0.01

0.01

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

33 of 57 

## 4.0 Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(mmm), NO

x 

## Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electr icity

A s stated in Section 1 .0 above, 110(l) of the CAA requires that a SIP revision not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment, and reasonable further progress (as defined in section

171 and 182 of the CAA ).



### 4.1 Purpose of the Rul e Revision

On March 25, 2014, the Georgia Board of Natural Resources (DNR Board) adopted revisions to Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(mmm), “NO

X Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity” that added subparagrap h 8 pertaining to stationary engines at

data centers.

Rule (mmm) was adopted by the DNR Board and submitted to EPA as part of Georgia’s October 28, 1999, serious attainment plan for the 1

- hour ozone NAAQS, and the revised plan dated July 17,

2001. Similar to the Gasoline Marketing Program described in section 3.0, Rule (mmm) is applicable to 45 counties (area of influence) in and around metro Atlanta. The 45

- county area of influence includes the following counties: Banks, Barrow, Bartow, Butts, Carroll, C hattooga, Cherokee, Clarke, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dawson, Dekalb, Douglas, Fayette, Floyd, Forsyth, Fulton, Gordon, Gwinnett, Hall, Haralson, Heard, Henry, Jackson, Jasper, Jones, Lamar, Lumpkin, Madison, Meriwether, Monroe, Morgan, Newton, Oconee, Pauldi ng, Pickens, Pike, Polk, Putnam, Rockdale, Spalding, Troup, Walton, and Upson. The 45

- county area of influence consists of the 20

- county 8

- hour ozone maintenance area for the 1997 ozone NAAQS plus an additional 25 surrounding counties that are attaining the standard.

Section 3.2.1.1.5.b. of the 2001 attainment plan explains the purpose of this new rule (mmm). The rule was developed and has been implemented to reduce emissions from stationary engines that tend to operate during high electricity demand days. These engines are referred to as “peaking engines”. Engines that are used solely for emergency power outages were not subject to the emission limits of

the rule. This emergency generator exemption is found in existing subparagraph 7 with the

defin ition of the type of engine and turbine that qualify in subparagraph 4.(i) as follows:

Emergency standby stationary gas turbines and stationary engines” means any stationary gas turbine or stationary engine that operates only when electric power from the l ocal utility is not available and which operates less than 200 hours per year.

Prior to the March 25, 2014, revision to rule (mmm), emergency generators at data centers were required to operate in accordance with the definition of emergency standby engines found in subparagraph 4.(i) However, these units at data centers have an operational need that differs slightly from that envisioned when rule (mmm) was originally adopted. Data centers are equipped with uninterruptable power supplies (UPSs). During a power outage, the data centers will receive power from the UPSs and not the generators, as envisioned by the definition of emergency standby engines. Instead the generators need to operate when the UPSs fail or become unreliable. Also, in

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

34 of 57 order to retai n reliability, emergency generators at data centers need to be operated for routine testing

and maintenance.



### 4.2 Rule Revision and Prevention of Increase in Emissions

– Ozone NAAQS

As a result of these difficulties , EPD added subparagraph 8 to specifically address the needs of data

centers. The limit on hours of operation for data centers is 500 hours per year, compared to 200 hours per year for emergency standby engines, in order to meet contractual, regulatory, and/or legal requirements. The new data cen ter provision also limits routine testing and maintenance to the hours of 10 p.m. and 4 a.m., a time of day in which ozone formation does not occur during the May through September ozone season. The new provision requires recordkeeping to ensure complianc e with the provisions of the rule. The new subparagraph 8. is shown below.

8. Stationary engines at data centers that meet all of the following criteria are not subject to the emission limitations in subparagraph 1:

(i) Operate only for routine testing and maintenance, when electric power from the local utility is not available, or during internal system failures;

(ii) Total annual operation for the engine is less than 500 hours per year;

(iii) Operation for routine testing and maintenance during the months of May through September occurs only between 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. Operation for routine testing and maintenance during the months of January through April and October through December may be done during any time of day; and

(iv) The facility maintain s records of all operation, including the reason for the operation.

As stated above, prior to the addition of the data center provision to Rule (mmm), generators at data centers were operated in accordance with the definition of emergency standby stationar y engines. Such engines are exempt from permitting in accordance with 391

- 3

- 1

- .03(6)(b)11(i). Since such engines are not required to be permitted, EPD does not have specific information on the number or capacity of generators at data centers. The genera tors at data centers remain exempt from permitting

in accordance with 391

- 3

- 1

- .03(b)(6)(b)11(iii) provided that the total horsepower of all engines at a facility remain below 1500 horsepower and no engine operates for more than 1000 hours per year.



### 4.3 Rule R evision

– PM 2.5 

### NAAQS

In the Final Redesignation of the Rome, Georgia Nonattainment Area for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter to Attainment on May 14, 2014 [79 FR 27493 through 27496], EPA agrees that amending Georgia Rule 391

– 3

– 1

– .02(2)(mmm) is an expected minimal increase and unlikely to

interfere the attainment of the PM 2.5 air quality standard.

“ Subsequent to publication of the proposed rule, GA EPD notified EPA that the Georgia Board of Natural Resources had modified Georgia Rule 391

– 3

– 1

– .02(2) (mmm) entitled

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

35 of 57 ‘‘NO

x Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity’’ to exempt certain engines at data cen ters from the rule’s NO

x limits...

GA EPD adopted Georgia Rule 391

– 3

– 1

– .02(2)(mmm) as a statewide ozone co ntrol

measure 3 , and the recent amendment exempts stationary engines at data centers from the

rule’s NO

x emission limits provided that the engines operate for less than 500 hours per year and only for routine testing and Maintenance (limited to May through September between 10 p.m. and 4 a.m.), when electric power from a utility is not available, or during internal system failures. These data centers are equipped with uninterruptable power supplies (UPSs) that supply electricity during a power outage, and th e exempted engines are designed to provide power only when the UPSs malfunction. Given the nature of the exempted engines and the conditions necessary to qualify for the exemption, any emissions increase is likely negligible ...EPA has concluded that the chan ges to the aforementioned rules do not affect the Agency’s decision to approve the redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Rome Area. Any increase in modifications is expected to be minimal and well within the margin necessary to maintain attain ment of the 1997 Annual PM 2.5 standard.”

EPA has agreed with this assessment for the Final Redesignation of the Macon, Georgia Nonattainment Area for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter to Attainment also, dated May 13, 2014 [79 FR 27194 through 27196 ]

. For the same reason that EPA concluded that the revision to Rule (mmm) did not affect their decision to approve the redesignation requests for Rome or Macon, this rule change will have no impact on the ability to attain or maintain ambient air quality standards

in the Atlanta area. This rule revision does not change or impose a new emission limit on stationary engines at data centers. Stationary engines that operate as emergency standby stationary engines, which applied t o data centers prior to the ch ange, were exempt from the NO

x emission limits of Rule (mmm). Under the revised rule, stationary engines at data centers are still exempt from the NO

x emission limits of Rule (mmm). Because the revision to the rule limits operation of data center
generat or engines to less than 500 hours per year and limits routine testing and maintenance operations to night

- time hours (10 p.m. to 4 a.m. ) , a period during which ozone and fine particulate matter atmospheric photochemical formation does not occur, this chang e will not result in an

emissions increase and thus has no impact on maintenance or attainment of the PM 2.5 and ozone NAAQS.

3 It should be noted that rule (mmm) is not a statewide ozone control measure. Rule (mmm) o nly applies to 20

counties that were designated nonattainment and 25 additional counties determined by EPD to contribute to nonattainment for the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Rome is located in Floyd County which is one of those 25

additional counties . Monroe Cou nty, a portion of which is located in the Macon nonattainment area, is also

one of the 25 additional counties.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

36 of 57 

## 5.0 NO

x 

## and VOC Sensitivity

A s stated in Section 1 .0 above, 110(l) of the CAA requires that a SIP revision not interfere with any

app licable requirement concerning attainment, and reasonable further progress (as defined in section

171 and 182 of the CAA ). This section will demonstrate that the emissions increases resulting from the removal of Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb) will insignif icant to no impact on ozone

concentrations in the Atlanta areas.



### 5.1 Sensitivity of Ozone in Atlanta to NO

x 

### and VOC Emissions

Control of NO

x and VOC are generally considered the most important component s of an ozone control strategy, and NO

x and VOC make up the largest controllable contribution to ambient ozone

formation . However, the metro Atlanta nonattainment area has shown a greater sensitivity of ground

level ozone to NO

x controls rather than VOC controls. This is due to the biogenic nature of VOC

emis sions in Georgia. Therefore, implemented control measures have focused on the control of NO

x emissions. The Atlanta nonattainment area is NO

x limited in such a way that changes in VOC

emissions have little effect on ozone formation.

5.1.1 Sensitivity Modeling NO

x and VOC Emissions

As part of the S outh E astern M odeling, A nalysis, and P lanning (SEMAP) project, Georgia Tech performed an analysis of the sensitivity of ozone concentrations in the Eastern U.S. to reductions in emissions of both nitrogen oxides (NO

x ) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This analysis was based off of the 2007 and 2018 SEMAP modeling which used CMAQ version 5.01 with updates to the vertical mixing coefficients and land

- water interface. May 1 st through September 30 th was modeled us ing a 12

- km modeling grid that covered the Eastern U.S. Details of the modeling platform set

- up can be found in Appendix D

.

5.1.2 Modeling Scenarios

Sensitivities were modeled relative to 2018 emissions to evaluate the impact of NO

x and VOC

reductions on dail y 8

- hour maximum ozone concentrations. Each emission sensitivity run reduced the 2018 anthropogenic NO

x or VOC emissions (point, area, mobile, NONROAD, marine/aircraft/rail) within a specific geographic region by 30%.

Georgia EPD performed a sensitivit y study with the information provided by the SEMAP modeling project and the Georgia Tech analysis to examine the normalized sensitivities of NO

x and VOC

emissions on 8

- hour daily maximum ozone concentrations (part per b illion ozone/ton per day, ppt/TPD) at 10 ozone monitors in Atlanta. EPD used a 75 parts per billion (ppb) threshold to address the 2008 ozone NAAQS. For further details on the approach used to calculate the

normalized sensitivities of NO

x and VOC, please see Appe n dix C

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

37 of 57 5.1.3 Modeling R esults



### Table 5

- 1. Normalized NO

x 

### and VOC Sensitivity at 10 Atlanta Ozone Monitors

AIRS ID Site Name NO

x (ppb /TPD) VOC (ppb/TPD)

13

- 067

- 0003 Kennesaw

- 0.0743

- 0.0045

13

- 077

- 0002 Newnan

- 0.0806

- 0.0018

13

- 085

- 0001 Dawsonville

- 0.0622

- 0.0007

13

- 089

- 00 02 South DeKalb

- 0.0771

- 0.0058

13

- 097

- 0004 Douglasville

- 0.0797

- 0.0042

13

- 121

- 0055 Confederate Ave.

- 0.0612

- 0.0077

13

- 135

- 0002 Gwinnett

- 0.0763

- 0.0026

13

- 151

- 0002 McDonough

- 0.0869

- 0.0034

13

- 223

- 0003 Dallas /Yorkville

- 0.0693

- 0.0011

13

- 247

- 0001 Conyers

- 0.0898

- 0.0031

AVERAGE (ppb/TPD)

- 0.0757

- 0.0035

The results in Table 5

- 1 above show that NO

x emission reductions are generally 1 5

- 2 5 times more effective than VOC emission reductions at reducing ozone concentrations . In order to look at the impact of removing NO

x or VOC controls on the 2008 ozone NAAQS, the site

- specific normalized sensitivities are multiplied by the increase in NO

x and/or VOC emissions

.

The site

- specific normalized NO

x and VOC sensitivities were applied to the expected emis sion increases due to the removal of the Consumer and Commercial Products Rule, Georgia Rule (aaa) and the Gasoline Marketing Rule, Georgia Rule (bbb). The emission increases are based on 2013 values and represent the largest impact as the emissions incre ase will decrease each successive year. The removal of the Georgia Rule (aaa) results in an increase of VOC emissions of 0. 17 tons per day in 2013. The removal of Georgia Rule (bbb) results in an increase of 5.03 tons per day of VOC in

2013 for the 45

- co unty area decreasing over time to 1.76 tons per day by 2040; while NO

x emissions increase to 3.20 tons per day in the 45

- county decreasing over time to zero by 2040. The corresponding ozone i ncrease s at each m onitor are found in Table 5

- 2 and demonstrate very insignificant increases in ozone concentrations. The calculated changes in ozone levels are below the level of precision of the ambient ozone monitors (1 ppb)

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

38 of 57 Table 5

- 2

. Emissions Increases Due to Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb) and Effects on Oz one Formation

Monitor Rule (aaa) Rule (bbb) Combined

2013

VOC

Emissions

Increase

with

Removal

of Georgia

Rule (aaa)

(tons/day) Corresponding

Ozone

Increase at

Monitor

(ppb) 2013 NO

x Emissions

Increase with

Conventional

Gas

(tons/day) Corres ponding

Ozone

Increase at

Monitor

(ppb) 2013 VOC

Emissions

Increase with

Conventional

Gas

(tons/day) Corresponding

Ozone

Increase at

Monitor

(ppb) Corresponding

Ozone

Increase at

Monitor

(ppb)

Kennesaw 0.17 0.0077 2.08 0.1545 5.03 0.0226 0.1848

Ne wnan 0.17 0.0003 2.08 0.1676 5.03 0.0091 0.1770

Dawsonville 0.17 0.0001 2.08 0.1294 5.03 0.0035 0.1330

South

DeKalb 0.17 0.0010 2.08 0.1604 5.03 0.0292 0.1906

Douglasville 0.17 0.0007 2.08 0.1658 5.03 0.0211 0.1876

Confederate

Ave. 0.17 0.0013 2.08 0.1 273 5.03 0.0387 0.1673

Gwinnett 0.17 0.0004 2.08 0.1587 5.03 0.0131 0.1722

McDonough 0.17 0.0006 2.08 0.1808 5.03 0.0171 0.1985

Dallas

/Yorkville 0.17 0.0002 2.08 0.1441 5.03 0.0055 0.1498

Conyers 0.17 0.0005 2.08 0.1868 5.03 0.0156 0.2029

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

39 of 57 

## 6.0 Emission O ffsets

In cases where VOC or NO

x emissions have increased due to the removal of a rule or a program in a nonattainment area, offset measures may be considered in a state’s 110 (l) demonstration. If an offset measure is used, it must be reproducible, enfor ceable, surplus, quantifiable, and a permanent measure. The emission reduction must also not otherwise be relied upon to meet air quality attainment requirements in other air quality programs related to the SIP.



### 6.1 Emissions Increase

As indicated in sec tion 2.1.1, t he removal of the Georgia Rule (aaa) results in an increase of VOC

emissions of 0. 17 tons per day in 2013 re sulting in an equivalent ozone season increase in emissions

of 4 2.54 tons.

T he removal of Georgia Rule (bbb) , is shown in sections 3.1 .1 and 3.1.2 and results in an increase of 5.66 tons per day of VOC in 2013 for the 45

- county area decreasing over time to 1.94 tons per day by 2040; while NO

x emissions increase to 2.12 tons per day in the 45

- county decreasing over time to zero by 2040. The removal of Georgia Rule (bbb) will not be approved by EPA until 2015, and the gasoline suppliers will continue to comply with the rule until that time. Therefore, for purposes of calculating offsets, Georgia EPD is interpolating between 2013 and 2016 for the 2015 emissions

increase as shown in Table 6

- 1

.



### Table 6

- 1. Interpolation of Emissions Increase Due to Georgia Rule (bbb)

2013 NO

x (tons/ day ) 2013 VOC (tons/ day ) 2015 NO

x (tons/ day ) 2015 VOC (tons/ day ) 2016 NO

x (tons/ day ) 2016 VOC (tons/ day )

2.12 5.66 1.66 4.61 1.43 4.08

The revision to rule (mmm) adds a provision that allows engines that were previously classified as “emergency generators” to be operated in accordance with a new provision for “data centers”. Since
emergency generators are not subject to the emission limits in rule (mmm), reclassifying these units as data center engines will not result in any increase in emissions.

Section 5 addresses the ozone formation in the Atlanta area and the sensitivity to reduct ions of NO

x and VOC emiss ions, and since the Atlanta area is a NO

x limited area, the control of NO

x emissions result in greater reductions of ozone at the monitor. The maximum VOC emissions increase resulting from the removal of Rules (aaa) 0.17 and (bbb) is 4.06 tons per day , re spectively . This increase in VOC emissions can be converted to an equivalent increase in NO

x emissions based on the

ratio of normalized ozone sensitivities found in section 5 as follows:

From Georgia Rule (aaa)

0.17 TPD VOC x (

- 0.0035 ppb/TPD VOC)/(

- 0.0 757 ppb/TPD NO

x ) = 0. 0079 TPD NO

x

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

40 of 57 Converted to Ozone Season Emissions:

0.0079 TPD x 244 days = 1.9 2 tons of NO

x

There are no NO

x emissions increases from Georgia Rule (aaa).

From Georgia Rule (bbb)

4.61 TPD VOC x (

- 0.0035 ppb/TPD VOC)/(

- 0.0757 ppb/TPD NO

x ) = 0. 2131 TPD NO

x

Converted to Number of Tons from the number of days the Rule is in effect* :

0. 2131 TPD x 10 7 days = 22.81 tons of NO

x

* Note: Georgia Rule (bbb) is in effect only from June 1 to September 15 of any calendar year, and

therefore in effect only 10 7 days per year

.

By adding the actual NO

x emissions increase to the equivalent NO

x emissions increase from VOC emissions using the sensitivity calculation, the resulting NO

x emissions increase leads to the needed

emissions offset.

1.66 TP D x 10 7 days = 177.62 tons of NO

x + 22.81 tons of sensitivity NO

x

200.43 = tons of NO

x offsets needed.

Table 6

- 2 summarizes the total offsets needed from both Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb).



### Table 6

- 2

. Emissions Offsets Needed from Removal of Georgia R ules (aaa) and (bbb)

Offsets Needed from Georgia Rule (aaa)

(tons) Offsets Need from Georgia Rule (bbb)

(tons) Total Offsets Needed

(tons)

1.9 2 200.43 202. 35



### 6.2 Emissions Offset

Because of the temporary increase in NO

x and VOC emissions in the nonattainment area due to the removal Rules (aaa) and (bbb), Georgia EPD is securing NO

x emissions offsets to ensure that both the original 13

- county 1990 1

- hour ozone maintenance area

, the 1997 20

- county ozone maintenance

area , and the 1997 22

- county 4 PM 2.5 maintenance area remain in attainment with their respective

4 20 entire counties plus 2 partial counties.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

41 of 57 NAAQS and that the rule removal will not interfere with attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the 15 county Atlanta nonattainment area. 

### Georgia proposes to demonstrate noninterference by

subs tituting the quantifiable, permanent, surplus, enforceable and contemporaneous

measures described herein to achieve equivalent or greater emission reductions to offset

these expected emission increases. The following is an analysis and calculations to

dete rmine the offsets needed to address the removal of the Rule (bbb) in 45 counties that encompass each of these maintenance and nonattainment area and the removal of Rule (aaa)

in the 13 counties of the 1

- hour ozone maintenance area, which is included within the 1997 and 2008 maintenance and nonattainment areas. As described more fully in this submission, a minimum of 202.35 tons of NOx emission reductions will be achieved through implementation of the Locomotive Conversion Program 5 

### and school bus early repl acements 6



### . As such, these measures will fully offset the expected emission increases associated with the removal of Rules (aaa) and (bbb). 7



### This SIP revision obligates the State to fully implement the Locomotive Conversion Program and is detailed in: 1) the attached Norfolk Southern Railway Company Scope of

5 The Locomotive Conversion Program will result in the:

• Conversion of 20 Norfolk Southern Railway locomotives in the Atlanta area from Tier 0 or lower locomotives with at least five years of expected remaining life, to ten mother/slug sets, where the “mother” locomotive will be ECO710 3,000 horsepower locomotives meeting EPA Tier 3 switch

- duty

emissio n standards or better (i.e., with lower emissions) to be completed by October 30, 201 5 ;

• Installation of locomotive technology to accommodate an electric layover system on the converted Norfolk Southern Railway locomotives and install plug

- in stations and a ssociated yard infrastructure to operate an electric layover heating system at the Norfolk Southern Atlanta Terminal in Atlanta, Georgia; and

• Conversion of six CSX Transportation locomotives in the Atlanta Area from Tier 0 or a lower rating
to 3,000 hors epower locomotives meeting EPA Tier 3 Line

- haul and Tier 2 Switch emission standards or better (i.e., with lower emissions) to be completed by October 15, 2016.

• Conversion of two Norfolk Southern Railway locomotives in the Rome area from Tier 0 or lower

lo comotives with at least five years of expected remaining life, to t wo mother/slug sets, where the “mother” locomotive will be ECO710 3,000 horsepower locomotives meeting EPA Tier 3 switch

- duty
emission standards or better (i.e., with lower emissions) to be completed by November 23, 2015.

6 School bus early replacements resulting in 5.08 tons per year of NO

x reductions in the 45

- county area were completed in 2014.

7 Georgia EPD notes that the Atlanta Area is NOx

- limited, so the impact on ozone formation of reducing NOx emissions is greater than it is for reducing emissions of VOCs. Accordingly, for purposes of calculating the emissions reductions necessary to offset the removal of Rules (aaa) and (bbb) from the SIP, Georgia is relying

on NOx emission reduct ions. As described in this SIP revision, Georgia performed a sensitivity analysis to calculate the NOx equivalent emissions reductions necessary to offset the expected emissions increase in NOx and VOCs associated with removal of Rules (aaa) and (bbb). Geo rgia EPD further notes that the impact of the

NOx and VOC emissions increase on ambient PM 2.5 concentrations is not expected to interfere with current progress toward attainment of the 1997 Annual PM 2.5 standard.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

42 of 57 

### Work for Atlanta, Paragraphs A through C; 2) the attached CSX Transportation, Inc., Scope of Work, Paragraphs A through C; and 3) the attached Norfolk Southern Railway Company Scope of Work for Rome , Paragraphs A through C. These attachments are included as part of this SIP revision. The Georgia Department of Natural Resources has entered into contracts with the Norfolk Southern Railway Company (contracts date April 29, 2014 and November 25, 2014) a nd CSX Transportation, Inc. (contract date August 19, 2014), to complete this work. In total, the Locomotive Conversion Program will result in at least

199.20 tons of NOx reduction s by no later than October 15, 2016

. More detail is provided

below.

In add ition, Georgia will make publically available the reports described in the attached Scope of Work documents, Paragraphs D through G. All future reports submitted to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources pursuant to these Scope of Work documents shal l be transmitted to EPA within 30 days of receipt by the Department.

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

43 of 57 6.2.1 Locomotive and Diesel Retrofit Conversion Offsets

Georgia EPD has both a locomotive retrofit program and a diesel school bus early replacement

program. These programs will provide ad equate emissions reductions to be used for offsets for the removal of Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb).

Locomotive Retrofit s :

Georgia EPD has been working with the railroad industry to retrofit existing diesel locomotive engines with lower emitting locomoti ve engines

.

The locomotive emission reduction program underway in Georgia is expected to reduce 199.20 tons

of NO

x per year for 10 years or more . These projects are funded through the US DOE Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) and esta blished though project awards from the GA DOT to the GA EPD and executed contracts between the GA EPD and Norfolk Southern Railway, Inc. and CSX. The Atlanta projects represent $24,000,000.00 in CMAQ funding and $10,290,000.00 in private match from the ra ilroads invested in implementing these low

- emission technologies. The Rome project represents $900,000.00 in CMAQ funding and $1,452,000.00 in private match.

Locomotives have very large engines (3000

– 3500 hp in these projects) and traditionally run on

‘locomotive

- grade’ non

- road diesel with resulting high emissions of PM, NO

x , and VOC. Under the CMAQ projects, 17 older traditional switcher locomotives, which operate 24

- hours per day year

round, are repowered with newly

- available low

- emission engines. In addition, 11 switchers will be converted to ‘slugs’, which are driven by electrical motors whose electricity is received from companion ‘mother’ locomotives . (This configuration is referred to as ‘mother

- slug’ locomotives.) The slugs will have no asso ciated diesel

- combustion emissions.

As shown in Table 6

- 3 , the emission reductions are phased in over 3 years starting in 2014, fitting into the March 2014 to September 2016 contemporaneous period.



### Table 6

- 3

. Locomotive Conversion Schedule

Conversio n Period Number of Locomotives

R e powered Number of Locomotives

Converted to Slugs

Nov

- Dec 2014 2 2

Feb

– Oct 2015 8 8

during or before Nov 2015 1 1

May

– Aug 2016 6 0

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

44 of 57 NO

x reductions from the locomotive reductions will yield 190.78 tons/year in Atl anta and 8.42 tons/year in Rome for a total of 199.20 tons/yr. Further details on the locomotive reductions can be found in Appendix E.

The converted low

- emission locomotives are required to remain in the assigned operating areas (in

and near the rail ya rds ) for at least 10 years after entering revenue service. Of note, other states that have supported locomotive emission reductions through the CMAQ program have had 2 to 5 year commitment periods. We are unaware of any other state that was able to secur e 10

- year periods of

commitment.

During this 10

- year period, 2008 Federal Locomotive Emission Standards are phasing in (EPA Fact

Sheet EPA

- 420

- /f

- 09

- 025 (Table 2). April 2009.). While locomotive fleets have a slow turnover (20 to 40 years for a Class 1 switcher locomotive), they are re

- manufactured every 15 to 20 years and must be brought up to standards at that time. According to the Regulatory Impact Analysis released with the 2008 Locomotive Standards, reductions from large railroad switch locomotiv es by the end of the 10 year period (2025) is estimated to be 11

, 886 tons of NO

x for the national fleet of 5206 switchers (page 3

- 79, section 3.3.2.2 and table 3

- 88, of the Regulatory Impact Analysis: Control of

Emissions of Air Pollution from Locomotive E ngines and Marine Compression Ignition Engines Less than 30 Liters Per Cylinder (RIA)). Scaling this to the approximately 30 switchers in Norfolk Southern’s Inman Yard and 10 switchers in CSX’s Tilford yard, the switcher fleet upgrades will reduce, on aver age, emissions of ~91 tons/year of NO

x . This does not account for the additional large emission reductions anticipated from the line

- haul traffic that moves through the Atlanta railyards. By 2025, the increased emissions from removing GA Rule 391

- 3

- .02(2 )(aaa) (consumer products) and 391

- 3

- .02(2)(bbb) is estimated to be only ~38 tons/year so the stricter standards in 2025 will more than offset the increase in emissions that would be expected with rules removal.

Further, Class I railroads assign the more advanced fleets to their large, urban, complex yards such as in Atlanta. These locomotives often have specialized equipment installed to aid in their control and operation. For example, the Norfolk Southern locomotives converted under the GA EPD CMAQ

pr ogram will have an Electric Layover Heating System installed so that they can be plugged into power systems installed in the yard to reduce the need for idling. It is highly unlikely that these

locomotives will be transferred even after the 10

- year commit ment period expires.

C onversion schedule s for this retrofit program can be found in Appendix E

.

School Bus Early Replacement :

Georgia EPD also has a strong school bus early replacement program. Recently completed 2014 projects funded by DERA and CMAQ grants, have resulted in NO

x emissions reductions of 5.08 tons

per year in the 45

- county area covered by Rule (bbb)

. Cal culations of NO

x emissions with in the contract time frame of the emission reduction can be found in Appendix E

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

45 of 57 

### 6.3 Offset Equivalency Demonstration

Based on the amount of offsets available from school bus early replacements and railroad locomotive engine retrofits, Georgia EPD has offsets in excess of the increase in emissions due to the removal of Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb). Tables 6

- 2 through 6

- 6 show in detail the emission increases and the available offsets for comparison.



### Table 6

- 5

. Emissions Decrease Due to All Retrofits

Source of Offset Locom otive Retrofits School Bus

R eplacements Total Decrease

NO

x Emissions

Dec reas e (tons/year) 199.20 5.08 20 4

. 28

The offsets available from both bus replacements and rail locomotive diesel retrofits totals 20 4

. 28 tons per year of NO

x .

As shown in Table 6

- 6, t he annual NO

x decrease from the school bus replacements and loco motive

retrofits are more than adequate to offset the maximum NO

x and VOC increase expected from the repeal of rules 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa) and (bbb). The increase in emissions from removal of these rules is at a maximum immediately following their repeal and gradually decreases over time.



### Table 6

- 6

. Emissions Increases Compared to Available Emissions Offsets

Emissions Increases Due to Georgia Rule (aaa)

(tons) Emissions

Increases Due to

Georgia Rule (bbb)

(tons) Total Emissions

Increase from

Rule Remo vals

(tons) Total Available

Offsets

(tons)

1.9 2 200.43 202.35 20 4

. 28

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

46 of 57 

## 7.0 Contingency Measures

All of the school bus early replacements that will be used as offsets have already occurred in a contemporaneous timeframe, and therefore meet the requ irement that offsets be reproducible, enforceable, surplus, quantifiable, a nd permanent . However, some of the locomotive retrofits (although cotemporaneous) will occur after this SIP revision is submitted to U.S. EPA. Therefore, Georgia EPD i s putting in to place a contingency measure for the likelihood that some of the locomotive retrofits are not completed. This contingency measure will ensure that sufficient

substitute emission reductions occur to replace any emission reductions that would not be reali zed by locomotive retrofits not be completed

.

7.1.1 Contingency Provisions

- Stationary Source Offsets

On December 30, 2013, Georgia Power Company submitted a construction application to Georgia

EPD for Yates Steam

– Electric Generating Plant in Newnan, Geor gia. Existing coal

- fired Units 6 and 7 are to be modified to operate at 100% natural gas, and upon completion of the project existing

coal

- fired Units 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 will be retired. The net decrease in NO

x emissions at the facility is 9,123.7 tons per year. The actual decrease in NO

x emissions from Units 1 through 5 will be 7435.0 tons per year. Georgia Power is not relying on the NO

x decrease from retiring Units 1 through 5 to net out of or avoid any applicable requirements (including nonattainment NSR). Furthermore, EPD has not relied on the retirement of Units 1 through 5 in any SIP revisions or any NAAQS attainment or maintenance requirements. Units 1 through 5 will be permanently retired by April 16, 2015.

The facility’s Title V permit modific ation was issued August 29, 2014

. Since the emissions reduction from the retirement of Units 1 through 5 is significantly larger than the emissions increase from the removal of Rules (aaa) and (bbb), EPD only needs to rely on the emissions decrease from

o ne of the units for offsetting emissions. EPD has elected to use the emission reductions from Plant Yates Unit 3 for offsetting emissions.

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS:

In order to determine the amount of emissions reductions resulting from the shu tdown of Plant Yates

Unit 3 available for use as offsets

, EPD used the prov isions of Appendix S to Part 51

- Emission

Offset In terpretative Rul ing to conduct an evaluation.

Section IV.C. of Appendix S defines the Baseline for determining credit for emissions and a ir quality

offsets in the following manner:

The baseline for determining credit for emission and air quality offsets will be the SIP emission limitations in effect at the time the application to construct or modify a source is filed. Thus, credit for emis sion offset purposes may be allowable for existing control that goes beyond that required by the SIP. Emission offsets generally should be made on a pounds per hour basis when all facilities involved in the emission offset calculations are operating at the ir maximum expected or allowed production rate. The reviewing agency should specify other averaging periods (e.g., tons per year) in addition to the pounds per hour basis if necessary to carry out the intent of this Ruling. When offsets

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

47 of 57 are calculated on a tons per year basis, the baseline emissions for existing sources providing the offsets should be calculated using the actual annual operating hours for the previous one or two year period (or other appropriate period if warranted by cyclical business cond itions). Where the SIP requires certain hardware controls in lieu of an emission limitation (e.g., floating roof tanks for petroleum storage), baseline allowable emissions should be based on actual operating conditions for the previous one or two year peri od (i.e., actual throughput and vapor pressures) in conjunction with the required hardware controls.

In Section IV.C. of Appendix S, offsets created through shutting down an existing source , must adhere to the following requirements :

3. Emission Reductio n Credits from Shutdowns and Curtailments.

(i) Emissions reductions achieved by shutting down an existing source or curtailing production or operating hours may be generally credited for offsets if they meet the requirements in paragraphs IV.C.3.i.1. through 2 of

this section.

(1) Such reductions are surplus, permanent, quantifiable, and federally enforceable.

(2) The shutdown or curtailment occurred after the last day of the base year for the SIP planning process. For purposes of this paragraph, a reviewing authori ty may choose to consider a prior shutdown or curtailment to have occurred after the last day of the base year if the projected emissions inventory used to develop the attainment demonstration explicitly includes the emissions from such previously

shutdown or curtailed emission units. However, in no event may credit be given for shutdowns that occurred before August 7, 1977.

(ii) Emissions reductions achieved by shutting down an existing source or curtailing production or operating hours and that do not meet th e requirements in paragraphs IV.C.3.i.1. through 2 of this section may be generally credited only if:

(1) The shutdown or curtailment occurred on or after the date the new source permit application is filed; or

(2) The applicant can establish that the propos ed new source is a replacement for the shutdown or curtailed source, and the emissions reductions achieved by the shutdown or curtailment met the requirements of paragraphs IV.C.3.i.1. through 2 of this section.

BASELINE EMISSIONS :

The provisions for det ermining baseline credit specified in Appendix S states that the SIP limits are in effect when a permit application is submitted. The requested SIP revision does not involve permitting activity, so this definition is not directly applicable. However, Geo rgia EPD is submitting

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

48 of 57 a SIP for the revision and the removal of several air quality rules. Thus, EPD will use the SIP limits in place at the time of submittal of the SIP revision. The emissions increase from the SIP revision

has been determined on a ton per year basis. However, some of the limitations are on a 30

- day rolling average basis. Thus, the analysis is carried out based on annual emission rates and, where a

30

- day rolling average applies, monthly emission rates. The baseline provision also st ates that baseline emissions should be calculated using actual annual operating hours for the previous one or two year period (or other appropriate period if warranted by cyclical business conditions). EPD has

used the two most

- recent available calendar y ear period (2012 and 2013) for calculating baseline

emissions. This data was obtained from EPA’s Clean Air Markets Program Data website. Baseline emissions for 2012 were 688 tons. Baseline emissions for 2013 were 632 tons. The average baseline

emission s for this 2

- year period are 660 tons/year.

Tables 7

- 1 through 7

- 3 show the baseline NO

x emissions of Plant Yates Unit 3 for 2012 at 687.70 tons per year and for 2013 at 631.34 tons per year with a resulting annual average emissions baseline

for 2012

- 2013 as 659.62 tons.



### Table 7

- 1

. Plant Yates Unit 3 Emissions Baseline For 2012

Facility

Name Facility

ID (ORISPL) Unit

ID Year Month Average

NO

x Rate (lb/MMBtu) NO

x (tons) Heat Input

Rate (MMBtu) Operating

Time

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 1 0.3439 62.274 358224. 7 703.5 0

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 2 0.3172 54.95 0 347173.9 671.5 0

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 3 0.3615 86.559 449601.7 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 4 0.3052 56.666 371056 .0 720 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 5 0.2746 54.091 392058.9 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 6 0.2782 14.37 7 103071.7 211.25

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 7 0.2532 48.787 382052.6 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 8 0.2599 50.466 386369.9 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 9 0.2552 51.948 406316 .0 720 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 10 0.2977 54.004 355901.8 646.75

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 11 0 .3833 82.964 424649.2 720 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 12 0.3301 70.616 426410.4 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 All 687.702

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

4 9 of 57 

### Table 7

- 2

. Plant Yates Unit 3 Emissions Baseline For 201 3

Facility

Name Facility

ID (ORISPL) Unit

ID Year Month Average

NO

x Rate (l b/MMBtu) NO

x (tons) Heat Input

Rate (MMBtu) Operating

Time

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 1 0.4881 109.57 444385.9 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 2 0.4173 86.65 415304.8 672 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 3 0.4508 105.17 465671.8 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 4 0.428 0 95.97 4 47970.6 720 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 5 0.26 00 58.73 450211.5 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 6 0.231 0 45.93 387750.5 720 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 7 0.2571 52.44 404768 .0 744 .00

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 8 0.343 0 77.06 430355.7 500.75

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 9

Yate s 728 Y3BR 2013 10

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 11

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 12

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 All 631.53



### Table 7

- 3

. Plant Yates Unit 3 Annual Average Emissions Baseline For 2012

- 2013

Facility Name Facility ID (ORISPL) Unit ID Year NO

x (t ons) Annual Average

Emissions Baseline

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012 687.70

Yates 728 Y3BR 2013 631.53

Yates 728 Y3BR 2012

- 2013 659 .62

SURPLUS :

Surplus is defined in 40 CFR 51.491 as “at a minimum, emissions reductions in excess of an established progra m baseline which are not required by SIP requirements or State regulations, relied upon in any applicable attainment plan or demonstration, or credited in any RFP or milestone demonstration, so as to prevent the double

- counting of emissions reductions.”

The shutdown of Yates Unit 3 has not been relied upon by any attainment plan or demonstration or credited in any RFP demonstration.

Yates Unit 3 is subject to the following SIP requirements and SIP

- approved state regulations:

• Georgia Air Quality Contro l Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(jjj), “NO

x Emissions from Electric Utility Generating Units” [Rule (jjj)]

,

• 40 CFR Part 76, the Acid Rain Nitrogen Oxides Emission Reduction Program , and

• The Clean Air Interstate Rule

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

50 of 57 For Georgia Rule (jjj)

, the surplus was determine d by first considering the sections o f rule that pertain to the facility. Plant Yates is located in Coweta County and is therefore subject to subparagraphs 3 and 5 of Rule (jjj). Both subparagraphs 3 and 5 state that each affected unit(s) shall

not excee d the alternative emission limit established in the Title V permit for the affected units(s). The current alternative limits are found in condition 3.4.8 of Title V permit 4911

- 077

- 001

- V

- 03

- 0 issued July 27, 2010. Condition 3.4.8 establishes a combined 3 0

- day rolling average emission limit

of 0.38 lb/MMBtu from the combined emissions from Yates Units 2 and 3.



### Table 7

- 4

. Plant Yates Units 2 and 3

, Actual Emissions For 2012

Month Avg. NO

x Rate (lb/MMBtu)

Unit 2 NO

x (tons)

Unit 2 Heat Input (MMBtu)

Unit 2 Avg. NO

x Rate (lb/MMBtu)

Unit 3 NO

x (tons)

Unit 3 Heat Input (MMBtu)

Unit 3 N O

x (tons)

Units

2&3 Heat Input (MMBtu)

Units 2&3 Avg. N O

x Rate (lb/MMBu)

Units 2&3 Rule (jjj)

limit (lb/MM

Btu)

1 0.384 37.41 190618.7 0.344 62.27 358224.7 99.69 548843.4 0.363

2 0.317 58.79 368492 .0 0.317 54.95 347173.9 113.74 715665.9 0.318

3 0.362 85.95 445547.9 0.362 86.56 449601.7 172 .51 895149.6 0.385

4 0.305 57.71 379976 .0 0.305 56.67 371056 .0 114.38 751032 .0 0.305

5 0.275 54.6 7 397491.6 0.275 54.09 392058.9 108.7 6 789550.5 0.275 0.38

6 0.284 49.88 350706.8 0.278 14.38 103071.7 64.26 453778.4 0.283 0.38

7 0.253 49.96 387965.9 0.253 48.79 382052.6 98.75 770018.5 0.256 0.38

8 0.260 48.73 375171.8 0.260 50.47 386369.9 99.20 761541.7 0.261 0.38

9 0.255 44.33 347220 .1 0.255 51.95 406316 .0 96.28 753536.1 0.256 0.38

10 0.264 18.55 140419.9 0.298 54.00 355901.8 72.56 496321.7 0.292

11 0.383 82.96 424649.2 82.96 424649.2 0.391

12 0.330 70.62 426410.4 70.62 426410.4 0.331



### Table 7

- 5

. Plant Yates Units 2 and 3, Actual Emissions For 2013

A comparison of actual emissions from Yates Units 2 and 3 for the basel ine period is c ompared to

this limit in Table s 7

- 4 and 7

- 5 . Actual emissions were obtained from EPA’s Air Markets Program Data website. Actual emissions were lower than the Rule (jjj) alternative limits for each of the months in which the rule was applic able.

When considering the Acid Rain Nitrogen Oxides Emission Red uction Program (40 CFR Part 76), Yates Unit 3 is subject to a multi

- state NO

x averaging plan in accordance with 40 CFR 76.11. Condition 7.9.7 of Title V permit 4911

- 077

- 001

- V

- 03

- 0 issued July 27, 2010, established an annual Month Avg. NO

x Rate (lb/MMBtu)

Unit 2 NO

x (tons)

Unit 2 Heat Input (MMBtu)

Unit 2 Avg. NO

x Rate (lb/MMBtu)

Unit 3 NO

x (tons)

Unit 3 Heat Input (MMBtu)

Unit 3 N O

x (tons)

Units

2&3 Heat Input (MMBtu)

Units

2&3 Avg. N O

x Rate (lb/M MBu)

Units 2&3 Rule (jjj)

limit (lb/MM Btu)

1 0.488 109.57 444385.9 109.57 444385.9 0.493

2 0.417 86.66 415304.8 86.66 415304.8 0.417

3 0.451 105.17 465671.8 105.17 465671.8 0.452

4 0.428 95.97 447970.6 95.97 447970.6 0.428

5 0.26 0 5 8.73 450211.5 58.73 450211.5 0.261 0.38

6 0.288 12.34 76983.7 0.231 45.93 387750.5 58.26 464734.2 0.251 0.38

7 0.257 52.44 404768 .0 52.44 404768 .0 0.259 0.38

8 0.300 29.84 193346.5 0.343 77.06 430355.7 106.9 623702.2 0.343 0.38

9 0.259 65.57 501190

. 0 65.57 501190 .0 0.262 0.38

10 0.485 99.20 409047.9 99.20 409047.9 0.485

11 0.539 106.96 397407.5 106.96 397407.5 0.538

12 0.561 87.83 312954.9 87.83 312954.9 0.561

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

51 of 57 average alternative contemporaneous emission limitation of 0.48 lb/mmBtu for unit 3. This condition also establishes an annual heat input limit of 4,830,444 mmBtu.

Tables 7

- 6 and 7

- 7 compare actual NO

x emissions an d heat input for unit 3 to the alternative emission and heat input limits. This comparison uses data from Tables 7

- 1 and 7

- 2 . Both the actual emission rate and heat input were below the limits during the baseline period.



### Table 7

- 6

. Comparison of Yates Unit 3 actual emission rate and heat input to Acid Rain averaging plan alternative NO

x 

### and heat input limits 2012.

Year Month NO

x (tons) Heat Input (MMBtu) N O

x (lb/MMBtu)

2012 1 62.27 358,224.7

2012 2 54.95 347,173.9

2012 3 86.56 449,601.7

2012 4 56.67 371,056.0

2012 5 54.09 392,058.9

2012 6 14.37 103,071.7

2012 7 48.79 382,052.6

2012 8 50.47 386,369.9

2012 9 51.95 406,316.0

2012 10 54.00 355,901.8

2012 11 82.96 424,649.2

2012 12 70.62 426,410.4

2012 entire year 687.70 4,402,887 .6 0.31

Acid Rain Averaging Plan

Alternative Limits 4,830,444 .0 0.48

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

52 of 57 

### Table 7

- 7

. Comparison of Yates Unit 3 actual emission rate and heat input to Acid Rain averaging plan alternativ e NO

x 

### and heat input limits 2013

.

Year Month NO

x (tons) Heat In put (MMBtu) N O

x (lb/MMBtu)

2013 1 109.57 444,385.9

2013 2 86.66 415,304.8

2013 3 105.17 465,671.8

2013 4 95.97 447,970.6

2013 5 58.73 450,211.5

2013 6 45.93 387,750.5

2013 7 52.44 404,768.0

2013 8 77.06 430,355.7

2013 9

2013 10

201 3 11

2013 12

2013 entire year 631 .53 3,446,419 .8 0.3 7

Acid Rain Averaging Plan

Alternative Limits 4,830,444 .0 0.48

For EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) annual NO

x program , the State of Georgia is not subject

to the CAIR ozone season N O

x program. CAIR is a market

- based trading program and does not establish facility

- level or unit

- level emission limits. Instead, allocations are issued to each effective facility and compliance is demonstrated through an inter

- state trading program admin istered by EPA.

The 2012 and 2013 NO

x allocations for Plant Yates were 5045 and 5122 tons, respectively. These figures do not include unused new

- unit set aside allowances allocated to Plant Yates. Actual

emissions from Plant Yat es, as obtained from EPA’ s Air Markets Program Data website, a re shown

in Tables 7

- 8 and 7

- 9

.



### Table 7

- 8

. Comparison of Yates Actual Emission Rates for CAIR Allocations 2012.

State Facility

Name Facility

ID (ORISPL) Year

Month Y1BR

NO

x (tons) Y2BR

NO

x (tons) Y3BR

NO

x (tons ) Y4BR

NO

x (tons) Y5BR

NO

x (tons) Y6BR

NO

x (tons) Y7BR

NO

x (tons) Total

NO

x (tons)

GA Yates 728 2012 1 41.88 37.41 62.27 107.41 13.65 215.98 478.60

GA Yates 728 2012 2 58.79 54.95 215.40 329.14

GA Yates 728 2012 3 85.95 86.56 21.33 86.00 171.07 4 50.92

GA Yates 728 2012 4 57.71 56.67 33.98 97.77 28.06 274.19

GA Yates 728 2012 5 54.6 7 54.09 156.2 0 264.96

GA Yates 728 2012 6 49.88 14.38 149.73 213.99

GA Yates 728 2012 7 49.96 48.79 159.80 44.87 303.43

GA Yates 728 2012 8 48.73 50.4 7 1 9.23 163.53 281.96

GA Yates 728 2012 9 44.33 51.95 155.81 252.09

GA Yates 728 2012 10 18.55 54.00 210.86 283.41

GA Yates 728 2012 11 82.96 210.41 30.11 323.49

GA Yates 728 2012 12 70.62 237.77 308.38

2012 Entire Year 376 4.5 5

2012 CAIR Allocation 5045 .00

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

53 of 57 

### Table 7

- 9

. Comparison of Yates Actual Emission Rates for CAIR Allocations 2013

.

State Facility

Name Facility

ID (ORISPL) Year

Month Y1BR

NO

x (tons) Y2BR

NO

x (tons) Y3BR

NO

x (tons) Y4BR

NO

x (tons) Y5BR

NO

x (tons) Y6BR

NO

x (tons) Y7BR

NO

x (tons) Total

NO

x (tons)

GA Yates 728 2013 1 109.57 235.97 345.54

GA Yates 728 2013 2 86.66 225.50 312.16

GA Yates 728 2013 3 105.17 29.092 134.27

GA Yates 728 2013 4 95.97 95.97

GA Yates 728 2013 5 58.73 58.73

GA Yates 728 2013 6 9.31 12.34 45.93 107.38 57.7 0 232.65

GA Yates 728 2013 7 52.44 78.27 41.30 172.00

GA Yates 728 2013 8 29.84 77.06 234.98 219.75 561.63

GA Yates 728 2013 9 65.57 203.5 2 205.57 474.66

GA Yates 728 2013 10 99.20 11.26 110.46

GA Yates 728 2013 11 106.96 38.19 145.16

GA Yates 728 2013 12 87.83 87.83

2013 Entire Year 2731.05

2013 CAIR Allocation 5122 .00

As shown in the tables, a ctual NO

x emissions from Plant Yates we re below the facility’s CAIR

allocations for both 2012 and 2013.

Condition 3.2.6 of Title V permit amendment 4911

- 077

- 0001

- V

- 03

- 5, issued August 29, 2014, requires Georgia Power to shut down Yates Unit 3 (as well as Units 1, 2, 4, and 5) once both

repower ed Yates Units 6 and 7 commence operation following conversion to natural gas. Yates Units 6 and 7 must be converted to natural gas by April 16, 2015. Therefore, Yates Unit 3 must be shut down by April 16, 2015. On and after that date, actual emissions from Yates Unit 3 will be zero. Since the baseline actual emissions from Unit 3 are all below the applicable current SIP requirements, the emission reduction associated with shutting down Unit 3 (660 tons/year) is surplus.

PERMANENT:

Since Yates Unit 3 will be permanently shut down on or before April 16, 2015, the emissions reduction from the shutdown of Unit 3 is permanent.

QUANTIFIABLE:

The baseline emissions for Yates Unit 3 were obtained from EPA’s Clean Air Markets Program Data

website. Emissions d ata contained in this website were obtained using continuous emissions monitors required by 40 CFR Part 75. Emissions following a shutdown are

, by definition

, zero. Therefore, the emission reductions are quantifiable.

ENFORCEABLE:

Enforceability of t he emission reductions from Yates Unit 3 are addresse d separately in Section 7.1 .3

of this document.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

54 of 57 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:

Other Requirements of Appendix S, Section IV.C.3 , specifically, P aragraph (i)(2) of Section IV.C.3.

states that emission reduct ions from shutting down an existing source is creditable only if the shutdown or curtailment occurred after the last day of the base year for the SIP planning process. EPA’s June 6, 2013, proposed rule for implementing the 2008 Ozone standard, “Implementat ion of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements; Proposed Rule”, states that states should use the calendar year for most recently available triennial emissions reporting inventory (2011) as the base year. The emission reductions from Unit 3 will occur at the time that the unit is shut down, which will be on or before April 16, 2015. Therefore, emission reductions from the shutdown of Yates Unit 3 are creditable.

SUMMARY :

This analysis shows that the emission reductions resulting from the shutdown of Yates Unit 3 meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51 Appendix S and are therefore creditable as offsets. The amount of

available offsets is the average of the 2012

- 2013 baseline period

, 660 tons per year.

In Section 6.1, EPD has determined that 202.35 tons [200.43 from Rule (bbb) and 1.92 from Georgia Rule (aaa)] of NO

x reductions are necessary to offset the maximum NO

x and VOC emissions increase that will result from the repeal of Georgia Rules 391

- 3

- 1

- . 02(2)(aaa) and (bbb).

The annual NO

x decrease from the retirement of Plant Yates Unit 3 is m ore than adequate to offset

the maximum NO

x and VOC increase expected from the repeal of rules 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa) and (bbb).

7.1.2 Contingency Measure Triggers

Bec ause some of the locomotive retrofits discussed in Section 6.2 have not yet been completed, Georgia EPD is aware that events could occur that could prevent the completion of the locomotive retrofit projects on which Georgia EPD relies for offsets. In orde r to ensure that there are sufficient offsets available for the emissions increase attributed to the removal of Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb), Georgia EPD is committing in this SIP revision to obtain any remaining necessary offsets from the contingency mea sure described in Section 7.1.1, above.

Upon the determination that sufficient offsets will not be achieved by the railroad retrofit projects within one year from the date of EPA’s final action to remove the Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb) from the SIP, Geor gia EPD will take action to ensure that equivalent offsets necessary to satisfy the entire emission reduction commitment of the State are achieved from the contingency measure described in Section 7.1.1 no later than one year from the date of EPA’s final a ction to remove Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb) from the SIP. Implementation of the contingency measu re is

discussed in Section 7.1.3

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

55 of 57 7.1.3 Contingency Measures

- Implementation

As stated in the introduction to this section, if an offset measure is used, it must be contemporaneous, reproducible, enforceable, surplus, quantifiable, and a permanent measure. The implementation component of this section of the SIP specifically addresses enforceability.

If it is necessary to implement the contingency measure describ ed in Section 7.1.1, Georgia EPD will revise Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(12)(f), Clean Air Interstate Rule NOx Annual Trading Program, for the purposes of retiring or reducing the appropriate New Source Set Asides and submit that rule

revision as a SIP revisi on. This SIP revision will also include the permit condition requ iring Yates

Unit 3 to shut down

.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

56 of 57 

## 8.0 Conclusion

In this SIP revision, Georgia EPD demonstrates that the removal of Georgia Rules 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa), Consumer and Commercial Products and Geor gia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(bbb), Gasoline Marketing ; from the Georgia SIP does not interfere with the requirements of 110(l)

.

Georgia Rules 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(aaa), Consumer and Commercial Products decreases VOC emissions in the nonattainment area only 0. 17 tons per day . Therefore, removal of this rule will have a very minimal impact on ozone monitors in the metro area.

The benefit of Georgia Rule 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(bbb), Gasoline Marketing that requires Georgia Gas in

the nonattainment area is also now minimal. Analysis shows that for both Georgia Gas and conventional gasoline, the NO

x and VOC emissions after 2012 are well below the 2006 MVEB or 2008 ozone maintenance plan levels while emissions from 2024

- 2040 never exceed the 2024 ozone maintenance plan MVEB.

Georgia Rules 391

- 3

- 1

- .02(2)(mmm), NO

X Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate Electricity is being amended so that the nonattainment area will not be impact ed at all. Therefore, revision of this rule will have no i mpact on ozone monitors in the metro

area.

Furthermore, the State of Georgia is a NO

x limited area and the sensitivity of ozone formation in the

Atlanta area to reductions of NO

x is greater than the sensitivity to reductions in VOC emissions

. Therefore the conclusions in this plan are consistent with EPA’s “ Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor Control Programs from State Implementation Plans and Assessing Comparable

Measures ” which states that the removal of a VOC control c ould result in an area

- wide VOC emissions increase, and yet may still be consistent with the conditions of Section 110(l) “in areas where ozone formation is limited by the availability of NO

x emissions .”

Off s etting emissions are available from early replacement of school buse s and locomotive retrofit s that more than cover the increase in NO

x and VOC emissions from the removal of Georgia Rules (aaa) and (bbb ) . This SIP contains a commitment from Georgia EPD that it will replace any offset not achieved through the diesel retrof its with stationary source contingency measure offsets that are
contemporaneous, reproducible, enforceable, surplus, quantifiable, and a permanent measure as required by 40 CFR 51 Appendix S

.

For these reasons, the removal of these rules meet the requirem ents of 110(l) ; specifically that their removal will not interfere with attainment, reasonable further progress or any other requirement of

the Clean Air Act.

### Revision to the Georgia State Implementation Plan for the Removal of Miscellaneous Georgia Rules

57 of 57 

## References

State of Georgia, Rules for Air Quality Cont r ol, Chapter 391

- 3

- 1, Effective Septemb er 5, 2013

.

EPA Consumer and Commercial Solvent Use Final Report: August 1996.

USEPA, National Emissions Inventory: Inventory years 2008, and 2010.

USEPA “Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementati on Plan Requirements”, 78 FR 34178 through 78 FR 34239, Proposed Rule, June 6, 2013. 1997

Atlanta 8

- Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan, March 21, 2012, submitted to EPA on April 4, 2012.