alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Uradni list C 450I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 450I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6328. december 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 450I

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6328. december 2020

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2020/C 450 I/01 | Izjava: Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, kar zadeva izredne dodatne vire in ureditev izvrševanja v okviru cilja naložbe za rast in delovna mesta, da se zagotovi pomoč spodbujanju odprave posledic krize v okviru pandemije COVID-19 in pripravi zelenega, digitalnega in odpornega okrevanja gospodarstva (REACT-EU) – sprejetje zakonodajnega akta | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2020/C 450 I/01

Izjava: Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, kar zadeva izredne dodatne vire in ureditev izvrševanja v okviru cilja naložbe za rast in delovna mesta, da se zagotovi pomoč spodbujanju odprave posledic krize v okviru pandemije COVID-19 in pripravi zelenega, digitalnega in odpornega okrevanja gospodarstva (REACT-EU) – sprejetje zakonodajnega akta

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 28.12.2020 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CI 450/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2020

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CI 450/1

---

Izjava: Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, kar zadeva izredne dodatne vire in ureditev izvrševanja v okviru cilja „naložbe za rast in delovna mesta“, da se zagotovi pomoč spodbujanju odprave posledic krize v okviru pandemije COVID-19 in pripravi zelenega, digitalnega in odpornega okrevanja gospodarstva (REACT-EU) – sprejetje zakonodajnega akta

(2020/C 450 I/01)

IZJAVA KOMISIJE

Izjava glede uvodne izjave 6

Komisija obžaluje, da sta se Evropski parlament in Svet dogovorila, da bo ciljna vrednost v zvezi s porabo za podnebne ukrepe navedena v uvodni izjavi, namesto da bi bila zavezujoče določena v členu uredbe. Komisija meni, da ji to ne daje ustreznih pravnih sredstev za učinkovito zagotavljanje, da bo prispevek virov REACT-EU dosegel dogovorjeno raven za namene splošnega cilja prispevkov za podnebje, določenega za večletni finančni okvir in Next Generation EU skupaj, v skladu s točko 15 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.

---
Kevin Michael ROSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4285

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
DISMISS; Opinion Filed February 7, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 00268

- CV

ADETUNJI FASHINA , Appellant

V.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MO RTGAGE

, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 00180

- C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices FitzGerald, Fillmore and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans

By postcard dated October 15, 2012, the Court notifie d appellant the time for filing

appellant’s brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion

within ten days. We cautioned appellant that if the brief and extension motion were not filed

within ten days, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, an

extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b),(c).

/David W. Evans/

DAVID W. EVANS

JUSTICE

120268F.P05120268.op.docx 2 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ADETUNJI FASHINA, Appellant

No. 05

- 12

- 00268

- CV V.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 00180

- C. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans.

Justices FitzGerald and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE recover its costs of this appeal from appellant ADETUNJI FASHINA.

Judgment entered this 7 th day of February, 2013.

/David W. Evans/

DAVID W. EVANS

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

                 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the
"Corporation")  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation certifies that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Corporation.


May 5, 2005



                                     /s/ Greg Wilson
                                    ---------------------
                                    Greg Wilson
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Daniel Lynn THOMAS, Appellant, v. Joseph NASTASI, Appellee.

No. 4D17-540

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 25, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40845

Summary Calendar

 

JUAN MORENO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

ERNEST CHANDLER, Warden,

 RespondentsAppellees.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-273

__________________________________________

May 28, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Moreno, federal prisoner # 46292-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition because it sought to raise 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claims. Moreno states that

the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 applies to his case because the district court in the

Southern District cf Texas did not address the merits of his prior 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion and

because this court did not grant him authorization to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 

Moreno’s arguments are without merit. See Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 451-52 (5th

Cir. 2000). The dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED.
M.A., the Mother, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

NO.: 3D16-2827

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                       527
<INVENTORY>                                     36,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,924
<PP&E>                                          14,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,629
<BONDS>                                         28,256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              160
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,048
<SALES>                                         36,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,056
<CGS>                                           29,901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (340)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (373)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Michael J. WOLFE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. L. CICERO PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Certiorari is denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: L.B.

PETITION OF: J.H., FATHER

:

:

:

:

No. 37 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chemspec International Limited (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bing Zhu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 17, 2010



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Bing Zhu           
|Name:  |  | Bing Zhu               
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Robert Klein, President and Chief Executive Officer of Shotgun Energy Corporation,  a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 of Shotgun Energy Corporation;



2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14 and 15d - 14) for the registrant and we have:



a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within September 30, 2006 prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.      All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 16, 2007





/s/ Robert Klein

---------------

Robert Klein

President and Chief Executive Officer
Julius Keith KNOTT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-2009

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EX PARTE Courtney Lamar MORRIS

1160042 (CR-15-0935)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fredrick JOHNSON; Brian Johnson, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 03-60839.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

DECIDED: May 21, 2004.

*496Charles Wiley Spillers, Assistant US Attorney, Oxford, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Imhotep Alkebu-lan, Jackson, MS, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Fredrick and Brian Johnson appeal their convictions for aiding and abetting the retaliation against a witness. *See*18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1513(b)(2). They contend that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that they acted with an intent to retaliate, and Brian Johnson argues that his inculpatory oral statement should have been suppressed.

We hold that the evidence supports the jury’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the Johnsons acted with an intent to retaliate, particularly in light of Brian Johnson’s inculpatory oral statement to that effect. *See United States v. Maggitt,*784 F.2d 590, 593-594 (5th Cir.1986).

We reject Brian Johnson’s claim that his statement should have been suppressed based on his contention that it was unreliable. The issue of his oral statement’s reliability was ultimately a question for the jury, which was free to find the Government’s witnesses’ testimony on this issue credible. *See United States v. Bermea,*30 F.3d 1539, 1552 (5th Cir.1994).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Paul D. Meringolo, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
and President of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul D. Meringolo                                                         
|Paul D. Meringolo Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of
the Board and President
|Date: November 7, 2008                                                        



36
|                             | Winland Electronics,      Inc. |                                       |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                             |                           |                                       |   |
| Date:       August 13, 2010 | By:                            | /s/ Thomas      J. de Petra           |   |
|                             |                           | Thomas      J. de Petra                    |   |
|                             |                           | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                             |                           |                                       |   |
IN RE: W. Glenn SOILEAU

NO. 2018-B-0394

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension, or in the alternative, for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status, filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the correspondence from respondent replying thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that W. Glenn Soileau, Louisiana Bar Roll number 12249, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.2, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Office of Disciplinary Counsel may seek the appointment of a trustee(s) to protect the interests of respondent's clients pursuant to the provisions of Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 27, if appropriate.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this _____ day of ____________________, 2018.

FOR THE COURT:

*/s/*

JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
| (i)   | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (ii)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 10, 2011 | By:    | /s/ BRUCE NELSON        |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | Bruce Nelson            |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2462-2463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/ A0A501010.999900 253G]


Indian Gaming; Approval of an Amendment to a Tribal-State Class 
III Gaming Compact in the State of Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation negotiated the 
Fifth Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for Class III Gaming 
between the Puyallup Indian Tribe and the State of Washington governing 
Class III

[[Page 2463]]

gaming; this notice announces approval of the amended Compact.

DATES:  This compact takes effect on January 17, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act (IGRA) requires the Secretary of the Interior to publish in the 
Federal Register notice of approved Tribal-State compacts that are for 
the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. 
See Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. All Tribal-State Class 
III compacts, including amendments, are subject to review and approval 
by the Secretary under 25 CFR 293.4. The Fifth Amendment to the Tribal-
State Compact for Class III Gaming between the Puyallup Indian Tribe 
and the State of Washington amends the previous compact. The Amendment 
adds to and revises the definition section; modifies Appendix X2 to 
increase the Tribe's allocation of player terminals; changes the 
calculation of State regulatory costs; clarifies the timing for payment 
to Problem Gambling and Smoking Cessation and Prevention Programs; and 
prohibits the acceptance of Electronic Benefit Cards. The Fifth 
Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for Class III Gaming between the 
Puyallup Indian Tribe and the State of Washington is approved. See 25 
U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(A).

    Dated: December 22, 2017.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Exercising the 
Authority of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018-00637 Filed 1-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
Karl Arthur KUMMER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1344

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Mario Tico MARLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Parmjit Singh PARMAR, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Michael KEISTER, Appellee.

No. 3D17-661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.