alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Raul Jesus MARI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

Richard C. Klugh, P.A., and Richard C. Klugh, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After conducting an evidentiary hearing on Appellant Raul Jesus Mari's motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial court entered a thorough and detailed order specifically identifying how each of Mari's claims were refuted either by the record or by the testimony provided at the evidentiary hearing. Because the trial court correctly applied the *Strickland*1 standard, and because each of the trial court's factual findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, we affirm. *See**Rojas v. State*, 922 So.2d 350, 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. The trial court's factual findings and credibility determinations are afforded deference and if supported by competent, substantial evidence, will not be disturbed on appeal.").

Affirmed.

1

*Strickland v. Washington*, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Document

Exhibit 10.12


AMENDMENT ONE TO THE
ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Energy Transfer Partners Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), is adopted by Energy Transfer Partners GP, L.P. (the “Company”) as of the date set forth below.


WHEREAS, the Company previously established the Plan;


WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it no longer desires to permit a Participant to choose between electing a flat dollar deferral versus a percentage deferral amount; and


WHEREAS, Section 8.01 of the Plan permits the Company to amend the Plan at any time.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan's terms as follows:


1.Section 4.02(b) of the Plan is hereby amended (strikethrough showing deletions; underline showing additions), effective as of January l, 2017, to be and read as follows:


“(b) A Deferral Agreement must specify (i) the Base Salary Deferrals elected for the Plan Year. provided that the Base Salary Deferrals may not exceed 50% of the Participant's Base Salary, (ii) the Incentive Compensation Deferrals elected for the Plan Year, provided that the Incentive Compensation Deferrals may not exceed 50% of the Participant's Incentive Compensation; (iii) the Unit Distributions Deferrals elected for the Plan Year, provided that the Unit Distributions Deferrals may not exceed 50% of the Participant's Unit Distributions; (iv) the Benefit Commencement Date; and (iv) the Form of Payment. Items (i), (ii), and (iii) above shall be expressed as a fixed whole percentage. If no Benefit Commencement Date is specified, the Deferral Agreement shall be deemed to specify a Benefit Commencement Date that is the date upon which the Participant Separates from Service. If no Form of Payment is specified, the Deferral Agreement shall be deemed to specify a Form of Payment that is a single lump sum.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused the Plan to be amended by this Amendment this 16th day of July, 2016.




			
	ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS GP, L.P.
	By: Energy Transfer Partners, L.L.C, its general partner

	By: /s/ Christopher Curia

	Its: EVP Human Resources
|   | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Nathan Mahalingam   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Nathan Mahalingam       |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| Date: December 28, 2011 |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Guy Burnett         |   |
| Guy Burnett             |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Idalecio ANDRADE

NO. 2016-KP-1427

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 2018

Not considered. See La.S.Ct. Rule IX, § 6.
#### Nancy GARDNER-COOK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-5001.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 11, 2004.

Daniel H. Shertzer, Sr., Principal Attorney, Lancaster, PA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Michael P. Milmoe, Principal Attorney, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before LOURIE, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*333
      *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,720,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,334,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                   476,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,772,039
<PP&E>                                       3,063,365
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,716,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,589,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,640,161
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,115,400
<COMMON>                                        35,627
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,912,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,589,255
<SALES>                                     30,872,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,872,095
<CGS>                                       21,137,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,013,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             776,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,262,966
<INCOME-TAX>                                   511,558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            751,408
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   751,408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### DATALECT COMPUTER SERVICES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-5125.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 11, 2004.

Robert B. Breisblatt, Principal Attorney, Philip D. Segrest, Jr., of Counsel, Welsh & Katz, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Brian S. Smith, Principal Attorney, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BRYSON, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R.36
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO. 09-18-00045-CV



### ____________________
IN THE GUARDIANSHIP AND ESTATE OF VIRGINIA BELL PORTER

___________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 12-29591-P

___________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION The appellant, Holly Silk, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is voluntarily made by the appellant pr ior to any decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No othe r party filed a notice of app eal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

_______ _________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice2 Submitted on May 23, 2018 Opinion Delivered May 24, 2018 Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14518-14519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-931]


Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the 
People's Republic of China: Correction to Countervailing Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: March 31, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Copyak, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Room 4014, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2209.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    On March 19, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
published a notice of countervailing duty order on circular welded 
austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the People's Republic of China 
(``PRC''). See Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from 
the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 11712 
(March 19, 2009) (``CVD Order''). Subsequent to the publication of the 
CVD Order in the Federal Register, we identified an inadvertent error.
    The notice states that on March 11, 2009, the United States 
International Trade Commission (ITC) notified the Department of its 
final affirmative determination of material injury. This is a 
typographical error. The Department received the ITC's notification of 
its final affirmative determination of material injury on March 12, 
2009.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 777(i) and 
706(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.


[[Page 14519]]


    Dated: March 24, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
 [FR Doc. E9-7230 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN the INTEREST OF I.S., S.S., H.S., D.S., and J.H., children.

S.S., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

Patrick R. Cunningham, Bradenton, for Appellant.

Stephanie C. Zimmerman of Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.

Laura J. Lee, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

*896The "Final Judgment for Termination and Permanent Commitment and Disposition (As to the children H.S., D.S., and J.S. ONLY)" is affirmed. The appeal from the "Order Granting the Petition to Terminate Mother's Parental Rights (as to the children I.S. and S.S. ONLY)" is dismissed as an appeal from a nonappealable, nonfinal order.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Vantage Drilling International (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Cimino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 1, 2017



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS J. CIMINO                    
|Thomas J. Cimino Chief Financial
Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
[LEGEND]
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Companys
Consolidated  Balance  Sheet  at December 31, 1999 and Consolidated Statement of
Operations  for  the six months ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in its
entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
[/LEGEND]
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        7952
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                15031
<ALLOWANCES>                                   262
<INVENTORY>                                   4383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             27810
<PP&E>                                       37964
<DEPRECIATION>                               26490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               55651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        11863
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       532
<OTHER-SE>                                   41429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 55651
<SALES>                                      17057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             32606
<CGS>                                         8779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                17213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (19026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (19326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (19326)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.38)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: May 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 98)]
[Notices]               
[Page 28672]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21my10-149]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7020]

 
Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation; 
Determination Under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Department of 
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Acts

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A decision has been made to remove the restrictions imposed on 
the Tula Instrument Design Bureau (KBP) and rescind Federal Register 
Notice 3039, from April 29, 1999.

DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Bachman, Office of Conventional 
Arms Threat Reduction, Bureau of International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-647-3937).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A decision was made on May 12, 2010, that it 
is in the foreign policy or national security interests of the United 
States to remove the restrictions imposed on the Tula Instrument Design 
Bureau (KBP) on April 29, 1999 under Federal Register notice 3039.

    Dated: May 17, 2010.
C.S. Eliot Kang,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-12322 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
Diego Jorge JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1345

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medidata Solutions, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tarek A. Sherif, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 16, 2011



By:

/s/    TAREK A.
SHERIFTarek A. SherifChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Medidata Solutions, Inc.




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Medidata Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Medidata Solutions, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.10

​
FORM OF AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
​
THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made [Date], among OHI Asset Management LLC (the “Company”), Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (the “Parent”), and [Name] (the “Executive”). 
​
INTRODUCTION
​
The Company, the Parent and the Executive are parties to an employment agreement (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”) generally effective as of [Date]. The parties now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement to, among other things, update the annual base salary payable to the Executive, and extend the term of the Employment Agreement by one year to [Date] (subject to earlier termination as provided in the Employment Agreement).   
​
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Employment Agreement is amended, effective as of the date first set forth above (except as otherwise provided below), as follows:
​
1.By substituting the following for the first sentence of Section 2(a):
​
“The Company shall pay the Executive a base salary of  $[   ] per annum, effective [Date of Amendment Effectiveness], which base salary will be subject to review effective as of [Anniversary of Amendment Effectiveness], and at least annually thereafter by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Parent (the “Compensation Committee”) for possible increases.”  
​
2.By substituting in Section 3(a), the year “[    ]” for the year “[   ]” wherever it appears. 
​
In all remaining respects, the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment.
​
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, the Parent and the Executive have each executed and delivered this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first shown above.
​
THE COMPANY:
​
OHI ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
​
​
By:____________________________________
​
​
​
THE PARENT 

OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.


By:​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​




THE EXECUTIVE:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Restaurant Properties II
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
    
    May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. MoriartyDirector, Chairman andChief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. TerranoExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer
# Uradni list C 38I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 038I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 643. februar 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 038I

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 643. februar 2021

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Objave |
| | UPRAVNI POSTOPKI |
| | Svet |
| 2021/C 38 I/01 | Obvestilo o preklicu | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

V   Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Svet

2021/C 38 I/01

Obvestilo o preklicu

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

V Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Svet

| 3.2.2021 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CI 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2021

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CI 38/1

---

OBVESTILO O PREKLICU

(2021/C 38 I/01)

Objava prostega delovnega mesta CONS/AD/167/21 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (1) se razveljavi.

---

(1)  UL C 29 A, 26.1.2021, str. 1.

---
Emerson HERRERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1697

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00229

- CR

Marcus Terrill Shed

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1206987D )

June 20, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has cons idered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ C hie f Justice Terrie Livingston