alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      of Chief Financial Officer**

**Under      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                February 19, 2008 | /s/                Gary J. Novinskie     |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Gary                  J. Novinskie       |
|                                    | Chief                  Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION


1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of GeoPark Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”), I, Andrés Ocampo, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  April 30, 2014





/s/ Andrés Ocampo


Andrés Ocampo


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Ravinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-74071, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*142Submitted April 2, 2004.*

Decided May 12, 2004.

Anju Multani, Downey, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri J. Scadron, Leslie McKay, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Ravinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s decision, on the basis of an adverse credibility finding, that he was not eligible for asylum. Singh also claims that he is entitled to withholding of removal. The petition must be denied because substantial evidence supports the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) determination that Singh’s testimony lacked credibility and that he failed to establish eligibility for asylum based on past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on any protected ground.

There were serious inconsistencies between Singh’s testimony and supporting documentation that were noted by the IJ. To overturn the decision, we would have to conclude that the evidence presented compelled a contrary result. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Given the serious inconsistencies in this record, that standard has not been met. Because Singh did not meet the eligibility requirements for asylum, he is not entitled to withholding of removal either.

THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Dean Daniel ANDREE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1st Response Submittal to the EPA Enclosure 4

Error # Error Description Correction Originator Responsibility Status

Date of 

Completion

1 EPA Comment 1-23-13 Missing Reference. 

Appendix SOTERM, Figure SOTERM-7 caption cites 

Altmaier (2011) but this reference is missing from the 

reference list. Please provide this reference.

This is a typographical error in Appendix 

SOTERM. The text will be corrected to read 

“Altmaier et al., 2008” which is already 

included as a reference in Appendix 

SOTERM, given below. The requested 

reference is included in Enclosure 2. Figure 

SOTERM-7 is based on Figure 5 in this 

reference and shows the highest three CaCl2 

concentrations shown in the published 

Figure.

This typographical error has been added to 

Enclosure 4, CRA-2014 Errata Tracking.

Reference:

Altmaier M., Neck, V., Fanghänel, T., 

“Solubility of Zr(IV), Th(IV) and Pu(IV) 

hydrous oxides in CaCl2 solutions and the 

formation of ternary Ca-M-OH complexes,” 

Radiochimica Acta 96, (2008).

EPA LANL-D. Reed Included in first 

response submittal to 

EPA

Submitted to EPA 

in first response, 

TBD

2 EPA Comment1-G-1 Reference Appendix QAPD-2014 

Not Provided. 

CRA-2014 Section 23, Models and Computer Codes, 

Section 23.5.7 states, "The DOE's quality assurance 

program, as applied to the CRA-2014, is contained in 

Appendix QAPD-2014." The appendix has not been 

provided. Please provide this document.

There was not an Appendix QAPD-2014 in 

the CRA-2014; therefore, the statement 

above is a typographical error in CRA-2014 

Section 23.5.7. The reference to Quality 

Assurance Program Document (QAPD) will 

be added to Section 23 References and the 

text will be corrected to read, “The DOE's 

quality assurance program, as applied to the 

CRA-2014, is contained in the Quality 

Assurance Program Document (U.S. DOE 

2010)." The QAPD is already included as a 

reference in the CRA-2014; however, a copy 

of the QAPD is included in Enclosure 2.

This typographical error has been added to 

Enclosure 4, CRA-2014 Errata Tracking.

EPA SNL-G. Safley Included in first 

response submittal to 

EPA

Submitted to EPA 

in first response, 

TBD

CRA-2014 Errata Tracking

End of CRA-2014 Errata Tracking

1
Back to Contents

| **Exhibit 21.1** |
|------------------|

**(1) LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF FELDMAN MALL PROPERTIES, INC.**

| **COMPANY**                                |   | **JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION** |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                            |   |                                  |
|                                       |   |                             |
| Feldman Holdings Business Trust I          |   | Maryland                         |
| Feldman Holdings Business Trust II         |   | Maryland                         |
| Feldman Equities General Partner Inc.      |   | Pennsylvania                     |
| Feldman Harrisburg General Partner Inc.    |   | Pennsylvania                     |
| Feldman Equities Operating Partnership, LP |   | Delaware                         |
| Feldman Equities Management, Inc.          |   | Delaware                         |
| Feldman Equities of Arizona, LLC           |   | Arizona                          |
| Feldman Mall Investors, LLC                |   | Arizona                          |
| Feldman Foothills Pads, LP                 |   | Arizona                          |
| Feldman Foothills Mall, LP                 |   | Arizona                          |
| Foothills Mall, LLC                        |   | Arizona                          |
| Feldman Pads Partner, Inc.                 |   | Arizona                          |
| Feldman Mall Partner, Inc.                 |   | Arizona                          |
| Feldman Equities Management, LLC           |   | Arizona                          |
| FMP Colonie Center LLC                     |   | Delaware                         |
| FMP Stratford LLC                          |   | Delaware                         |

88

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9029-9030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03296]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8630]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Richard Wilson and the Transformation of European 
Landscape Painting'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Richard Wilson and the Transformation of 
European Landscape Painting'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, 
CT, from on or about March 6, 2014, until on or about June 1, 2014, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

[[Page 9030]]

    Dated: February 7, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-03296 Filed 2-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Terrence W. Olson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of THL Credit, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                         
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2011 |  | By: |  | /S/    TERRENCE W.
OLSON
|                     |  |     |  | Terrence W. Olson       
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
January 25, 2012 

Petition for extension of exemption 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington DC 20590 

1 iiereby petition for an extension of exemption No 9851 from 14 CFR Pari 91.109 (a) 

docket number FAA-2009-0223, 

The circumstances for the original request are still valid so I hereby request renewal of 

said exemption. 

Respectfully, 

Adrian Bonilla 

ATP 2704111 

2704111CFI 

1902 Mission Creek Circle 

Houston, TX 77084 

832-496-0115
# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 262 ) ll-K - (I ) -7 5 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57

AM Sheet 262 of 325 P. 1P. 2 

# /A \Pl ^ 

# - (0 II-K-(I)-7 5

ANALYSI S O F NATURA L GA S CONSUME R REGULATOR Y REFOR M LEGISLATIO N Departmen t o f Energ y(author ) Forwarde d b

yT . Hogan , EE At o R . Short , EPArEA B Marc h 17 , 198 3 THI S INFORMATIO NCA

NB E FOUN D I NDOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE M H_K-(I)-7 5
Exhibit 4.36
DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON SHARES
REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
General
The following is a description of the principal terms of Abbott Laboratories’ common shares.  The following description is not meant to be complete and is qualified by reference to Abbott’s Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws, each of which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the Illinois Business Corporation Act.  You are urged to read Abbott’s Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws in their entirety.
Authorized
Abbott has 2,400,000,000 authorized common shares, without par value, and 1,000,000 authorized preferred shares, $1.00 par value per share.  The board of directors determines the terms and the manner in which the preferred shares may be issued.  No preferred shares are currently outstanding.
Listing
The principal market for Abbott’s common shares is the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ABT.”  Shares are also listed on the Chicago Stock Exchange and traded on various regional and electronic exchanges.  Outside of the United States, Abbott’s shares are listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange.
Dividends
The board of directors may authorize, and Abbott may make, distributions to its common shareholders, subject to any restriction in Abbott’s Restated Articles of Incorporation, including the rights of holders of outstanding preferred shares, if any, and to those limitations prescribed by law.
Fully Paid
All of Abbott’s outstanding common shares are fully paid and non-assessable.
Voting Rights
Each of Abbott’s outstanding common shares is entitled to one vote in each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of shareholders. In addition, in all elections for directors, every shareholder has the right to vote the number of shares owned by it for as many persons as there are directors to be elected, or to cumulate its votes and give one candidate as many votes as shall equal the number of directors multiplied by the number of shares or to distribute its cumulative votes in any proportion among any number of candidates.
Shareholder Action by Written Consent; Meetings
Under Illinois corporate law, any action required to be taken by Abbott’s shareholders may be taken without a meeting and without a vote if a consent in writing is signed by holders of shares having at least the number of votes necessary at a shareholder meeting.
Abbott’s By-Laws provide that special meetings of the shareholders of the corporation may be called only by:
		·
	the board of directors;


​



		·
	the chairman of the board;


		·
	the chief executive officer;


		·
	any president;


		·
	the holders of not less than one-fifth of all outstanding shares entitled to vote on the matter for which the meeting is called.


Transfer Agent and Registrar
Computershare Trust Co. NA is Abbott’s transfer agent and registrar. Computershare Trust Co. NA is located in Providence, Rhode Island.
EX PARTE Amy Bishop ANDERSON

1151283 (CR-15-0362)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of SeaOspa, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my best knowledge and belief:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:  April
16, 2010





/s/ Bruce GoldsteinBruce
      GoldsteinPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Kayle Barrington BATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Kayle Barrington Bates, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent.

No. SC17-850 No. SC17-1224

Supreme Court of Florida.

[January 22, 2018]

Sarah S. Butters of Ausley McMullen, Tallahassee, Florida, and Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Scott Gavin, and Rachel Day, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent

PER CURIAM.

Kayle Barrington Bates appeals the circuit court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const.

Bates seeks relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Bates' appeal and consideration of his habeas petition pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Bates responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in both cases.

After reviewing Bates' response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Bates is not entitled to relief. Bates was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of nine to *99three. *Bates v. State*, 750 So.2d 6, 9 (Fla. 1999). Bates' sentence of death became final in 2000. *Bates v. Florida*, 531 U.S. 835, 121 S.Ct. 93, 148 L.Ed.2d 53 (2000). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Bates' sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Bates' motion and deny his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Bates, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.