alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 19, 2021

No. 04-20-00596-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.K. AND C.A.K., CHILDREN

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI01008

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed on January 7, 2021. The reporter’s record was originally due 

to be filed in this appeal on January 12, 2021. On January 25, 2021, this court notified the court 

reporter responsible for preparing the record, Ms. Judy Busbee-Mata, that the reporter’s record 

was late. Ms. Busbee-Mata was directed to file a notification of late record if she had not 

received payment no later than February 4, 2021. Otherwise, the reporter’s record was due 

February 24, 2021. Neither a notification of late record nor the reporter’s record were filed by 

the extended deadline.

Accordingly, on March 1, 2021, this court ordered Ms. Busbee-Mata to file the reporter’s 

record in this court no later than March 31, 2021. On March 2, 2021 and again on March 16, 

2021, Ms. Busbee-Mata filed a letter with this court stating she would immediately file a 

notification of late record. No notification has been filed. However, in her letters, she states no 

attorney has requested a reporter’s record from her or made arrangements to pay for the 

record.

Accordingly, if appellant desires a reporter’s record, he is hereby ORDERED to (1) 

request in writing, no later than March 29, 2021, that a reporter’s record be prepared and (2) 

designate in writing, no later than March 29, 2021, the exhibits and those portions of the record 

to be included in the reporter’s record. Id. The appellant is hereby ORDERED to file a copy of 

the request with both the trial court clerk, id. at 34.6(b)(2), and this court no later than March 

29, 2021.

It is further ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court no later than 

March 29, 2021 that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made 

to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty 

(30) days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points 

raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 37.3(c).
_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of March, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
----

Action brought on 21 April 2005 by Renate AMM and 14 others against European Parliament

(Case T-170/05)

(2005/C 171/49)

Language of the case: French

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 21 April 2005 by Renate AMM, residing in Brussels, and 14 other officials, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward are the same as those in Cases T-130/05, T-160/05 and T-162/05 and similar to those in Cases T-58/05 and T-164/05.

----
1

The Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the

District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3979

___________

Timothy Carmine Muccilli, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Joel Bos; Norman J. Loren; Mark *

Mansavage; John K. Carlson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 31, 2006

Filed: November 2, 2006

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Muccilli appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. Having conducted de novo review, we

conclude that summary judgment was proper. See Lee v. Spellings, 447 F.3d 1087,

1088-89 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant of summary judgment may be affirmed on any basis
-2-

supported by record); Lommen v. City of East Grand Forks, 97 F.3d 272, 274 (8th Cir.

1996) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
Steven KELLER, Appellant, v. Olin RAMSEYER o/b/o A.R. and B.R., Minors, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-635, 5D17-639

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 28, 2018

Patrick M. Megaro, Robert L. Hughes and Joseph G. Easton, of Halscott Megaro, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

David A. Baker and Mark A. Cavins, of The Law Office of David A. Baker, P.A., Rockledge, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Appellant (the stepfather of the alleged minor victims) challenges final judgments of injunction for protection against sexual violence filed by Appellee (the father of the alleged minor victims). Although the children denied the allegations during the videotaped interview with the Child Protection Team and there were no eyewitnesses to the alleged abuse, the trial judge granted the injunction primarily based on Appellee's testimony about what his children allegedly told him. Appellant's threshold claim of error relates to the admissibility of this testimony under section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes (2017). We need not address this evidentiary issue here because we conclude that Appellant's other claim of error based on section 784.046(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), is dispositive. In this case, there were no eyewitnesses, affidavits from eyewitnesses, or direct physical evidence of the alleged abuse to support the allegations.

*469Accordingly, there was a lack of substantial, competent evidence to support the injunction. *See**T.B. v. R.B. (In re A.B.)* , 186 So.3d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (holding that mother failed to meet requirements of section 784.046(4)(a) for obtaining injunction against father where she was not eyewitness to alleged acts and failed to introduce physical evidence or affidavit from eyewitness to alleged acts). The final judgments are reversed.

REVERSED.

TORPY, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Sylvester MCCLENDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3950

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2 

Certification of CAO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer M. Wilson, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  

  

|                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/     JENNIFER M. WILSON          |
| Name:   Jennifer M. Wilson                    |
| Title:     Chief Accounting Officer |
| Date:     March 3, 2022        |
Tequan Sabre GRAHAM v. STATE

CR-15-1326

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Erik Patrick JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5868

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 809 

Recognizing Rett Reef off the coast of San Leon, Texas, in Galveston Bay, 

and all those associated with bringing the project to fruition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 24, 2023 

Mr. WEBER of Texas submitted the following resolution 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Rett Reef off the coast of San Leon, Texas, 

in Galveston Bay, and all those associated with bringing 

the project to fruition. 

Whereas the completion of Rett Reef off the coast of San 

Leon, Texas, in Galveston Bay, will mark the first oyster 

restoration reef in Texas established by a private oyster 

industry member; 

Whereas Lisa Halili, the founder of the San Leon Oyster 

Fest (SLOF), first conceived of the idea for Rett Reef to 

raise awareness of Rett syndrome, a rare 

neurodevelopmental disorder that primarily impacts girls 

and women and is characterized by slowing development, 

loss of mobility, and other life-changing symptoms; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 809 IH 

Whereas the Rett Reef project is being made possible through 

a partnership involving SLOF, Pier 6 Seafood & Oyster 

House, Prestige Oysters, The Nature Conservancy, and 

Texas Sea Grant at Texas A&M University; 

Whereas, for the creation of Rett Reef, Pier 6 Seafood & 

Oyster House is donating all the shells necessary to help 

restore a historical sport fishing reef that was destroyed 

by Hurricane Ike; 

Whereas, upon its completion, Rett Reef will be a nonharvestable oyster reef spanning 10 acres and will play an instrumental role in improving water quality, attracting 

fauna, protecting the area from storm surges, and educating the public about the many benefits provided by 

oyster reefs; 

Whereas, in addition, Rett Reef will serve as a habitat for 

fish and invertebrate species, and anglers will be able to 

use it as a recreational fishing location; and 

Whereas, with its natural beauty and abundant wildlife, the 

Galveston Bay area is one of the treasures of the Lone 

Star State, and Rett Reef will be a valuable addition to 

this vibrant and unique ecosystem: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the contribution of Rett Reef in 

3 Galveston Bay, off the coast of San Leon, Texas, for 

4 its value to the Texas Gulf Coast; and 

5 (2) extends sincere appreciation to all those as6 sociated with Rett Reef for their efforts to bring the 

7 project to fruition. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Michael J. LEGER, II v. Danielle Gotreaux LEGER

NO. 2018-CJ-0039

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.
Angel MOLINA, a/k/a Angel M. Molina, a/k/a Angel Miguel Molina, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1935

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      December 10, 2010 | /s/ Neil J. Pestell                                                                                                                                              |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Neil      J. Pestell, Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary,      Treasurer,principal      financial officer and principal accounting  officer |

----
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant



| |  |  | Changyou.com (HK) Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing AmazGame Age Internet Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the PRC.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing Changyou Gamespace Software Technology Co., Ltd., incorporated in the PRC.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | ICE Entertainment (HK) Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | ICE Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, incorporated in the PRC.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Beijing Yang Fan Jing He Information Consulting Co., Ltd, incorporated in the PRC.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Changyou.com (US), Inc., incorporated in the United States.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Changyou.com (UK) Co., Ltd., incorporated in the United Kingdom.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Changyou My Sdn. Bhd, incorporated in Malaysia.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Changyou.com Korea Limited, incorporated in South Korea.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------
Marlon Quantez KELLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1783

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Forest Service published a Notice of Availability Record of Decision in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 24, 2009. The document contained an incorrect Internet address.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Glen Parker, Realty Specialist, Lands, 202-205-1196 or Ron Pugh, Planning Specialist, Ecosystem Management Coordination, 202-205-0992. USDA Forest Service, L; (Glen Parker); 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Mailstop Code: 1124; Washington, DC 20050-1124.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 24, 2009, (73 FR 12306), on page 12307, in the                         **ADDRESSES**                         section, correct the Internet address to read:                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The ROD is available on the Internet at                         *http://www.corridoreis.anl.gov*. Printed copies will be available at one of the involved National Forest supervisor or district ranger offices in the 10 Western States.                    

                        Dated:                         *March 26, 2009.*

Gloria Manning,

Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.

[FR Doc. E9-7376 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Exhibit
12.2




CERTIFICATION
BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Michel
G. Cayouette, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Telesat Canada;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
[reserved];
 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Date:  March
3, 2010
 
 
  ____________________________________________________________________________
 ­­­­­­Name:         Michel
G. Cayouette
 Title:           Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Vantage Drilling International (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ihab Toma, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 1, 2017



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ IHAB TOMA                    
|Ihab Toma Chief Executive
Officer
Robert WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D17-3513 4D17-3514

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2018]

Robert Washington, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Robert Washington appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion, as well as the trial court's order prohibiting him from filing future pro se pleadings unless signed by a member of the Florida Bar. We sua sponte consolidate the cases for review and affirm both orders. The trial court properly treated Washington's habeas petition as a successive and untimely rule 3.850 motion. Further, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it issued the sanction order barring further pro se filings from Washington. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(n).

*Affirmed* .

Gerber, C.J., May and Levine, JJ., concur.
Claudio NARANJO, Appellant, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-384

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
F. Renee KIRK and Raymond L. Kirk, Appellants, v. Brenda GRAFTON and William Grafton, Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D16-5255

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Shuron HESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 11, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.