alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel Loan Repayment Program.                    

*Date:*                         April 28, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Laurie Friedman Donze, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Complementary, and Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1030,                         *donzel@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: March 31, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-7713 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 99.2
                            MAXUS REALTY TRUST, INC.

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Maxus  Realty  Trust,  Inc.  (the
"Trust") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John W.
Alvey,  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  &  Accounting  Officer of the Trust,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Trust as of March 31, 2003 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).



/s/ John W. Alvey
---------------------
John W. Alvey
Vice President
Chief Financial & Officer
May 6, 2003
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1151 

To terminate authorizations for the use of military force and declarations 

of war no later than 10 years after the enactment of such authorizations 

or declarations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. OSSOFF, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To terminate authorizations for the use of military force 

and declarations of war no later than 10 years after 

the enactment of such authorizations or declarations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accountability for 

5 Endless Wars Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1151 IS

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR THE USE 

2 OF MILITARY FORCE AND DECLARATIONS OF 

3 WAR. 

4 (a) FUTURE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR THE USE OF

5 MILITARY FORCE AND DECLARATIONS OF WAR.—Any au6 thorization for the use of military force or declaration of 

7 war enacted into law after the date of the enactment of 

8 this Act shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after 

9 the date of the enactment of such authorization or declara10 tion. 

11 (b) EXISTING AUTHORIZATIONS FOR THE USE OF

12 MILITARY FORCE AND DECLARATIONS OF WAR.—Any au13 thorization for the use of military force or declaration of 

14 war enacted before the date of the enactment of this Act 

15 shall terminate on the date that is 6 months after the date 

16 of such enactment. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth THURMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-10346.

D.C. No. CR-02-00172-KJD/PAL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 2004.

Decided May 7, 2004.

Karyn Kenny, John M. Gillies, Thomas S. Dougherty, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rene L. Valladares, AFPD, Anne R. Traum, Federal Public Defender’s Office (Las Vegas), Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

*736Before WALLACE, KOZINSKI, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Thurman appeals from his conviction and sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for possessing a controlled substance with intent to distribute. We have jurisdiction over Thurman’s timely filed appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Giving due deference to the district court’s factual findings, *see United States v. Morning,*64 F.3d 531, 532 (9th Cir.1995) (“[W]e review the trial court’s factual findings for clear error”), we conclude that the district court properly denied Thurman’s motion to suppress statements from his custodial interrogation. *See United States v. Male Juvenile,*280 F.3d 1008, 1022 (9th Cir.2002) (“We review de novo the voluntariness of appellant’s confession”). Thurman faults the arresting officers for brandishing firearms and blindfolding him during his initial stop, but these tactics at his arrest did not necessarily foster a coercive atmosphere at the scene of his subsequent custodial interrogation. Because Thurman has not shown that any of the district court’s factual findings were clearly erroneous, we conclude that “the totality of the circumstances” refute his assertion that the police obtained his confession “by physical or psychological coercion or by improper inducement so that [his] will was overborne.” *Male Juvenile,*280 F.3d at 1022, *quoting Derrick v. Peterson,*924 F.2d 813, 817 (9th Cir.1990).

We likewise affirm the denial of Thurman’s motion to suppress evidence from the search of his residence. Viewing the factual record “in the light most favorable to the verdict,” *United States v. Kim,*25 F.3d 1426, 1432 (9th Cir.1994), we discern no clear error in the district court’s determination that Thurman voluntarily consented to the search of his home. *See United States v. Todhunter,*297 F.3d 886, 891 (9th Cir.2002) (“We review for clear error a district court’s determination of the voluntariness of a defendant’s consent to a search”).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,049] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 30, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of Entegris Inc., Chaska, Minnesota. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of March 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7739 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
SUCCESSION OF Rosalie Romano RESTIVO

NO. 2018-CC-0223

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 17-PDB-065

NO. 2017-OB-2129

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

Leave to appeal denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
ACT RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report (report) on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Restaurant
Properties II;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andAny fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 11, 2006
    /s/ Ronald PowellRonald PowellChief Executive Officer
Jana RITTER v. Victor LORASO, III

NO. 2018-C-0149

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.
Randy Allen CHESSER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5678

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,438]


Gulliver's Travels, Inc., Sarasota, FL; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 6, 2009, in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of workers of Gulliver's Travels, Inc., Sarasota, 
Florida.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-7762 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Barry PUGH, Plaintiff—Appellant, James Copeland, Plaintiff, v. L.A. DARLING COMPANY, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 03-2724.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 14, 2004.

Decided May 11, 2004.

Luther Oneal Sutter, Harrill & Sutter, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard Andrew Lusby, Womack & Landis, Jonesboro, AR, Devlin Joseph Schoop, Thomas S. Bradley, Laner & Mu-chin, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After his employment was terminated for excess absenteeism, Barry Pugh filed suit against his former employer, the L.A. Darling Company, under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). *See*29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2000). The District Court1 granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant and dismissed the case. Pugh appeals the grant of summary judgment and urges that the District Court erred when it determined that he failed to establish a FMLA claim and when it determined that he failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. *See Gen. Trading Int'l. Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,*320 F.3d 831, 835 (8th Cir. 2003). We agree that the record at summary judgment does not support Pugh’s contention that certain of his absences were covered by his prior FMLA requests, that he was penalized for these covered absences, and that he provided the company with sufficient notice of his anxiety disorder so as to invoke the FMLA. We also agree that Pugh has failed to make out a prima facie case of retaliation insofar as he cannot establish a causal connection between his previous invocation of the FMLA and his eventual termination. Accordingly, we affirm based on the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chad Stone, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Renewable Energy Group, Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                   
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Chad Stone                    
|Dated: May 2, 2011 |  |  |  | Chad Stone Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

         I, Mark Nicholas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Kids Germ Defense Corp. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Kids Germ Defense Corp.


February 16, 2010                 By: /s/  Mark Nicholas
                                      ------------------
                                      Mark Nicholas, Sole Officer and Director
                                      and Principal Executive, Financial
                                      and Accounting Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kids Germ Defense Corp. and will be retained by Kids Germ Defense
Corp. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
Lonnie Charles YOUNG, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4433

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 3:04:40 PM

To: Raymond, Michael; AS_Waiver_Requests; Armstrong, Ashley; Llenza, Charles

Subject: RE: Petition for Waiver a nd Application for Interim Waiver

- Hussmann Bulk Produce Cases

Auto forwarded by a Rule

Mr. Raymond

We agree that a test temperature of 49 ± 2 Degrees Fahrenheit would be sufficient. This was added to

the attached waiver.

Thank you,

Ron Shebik

Re gulatory Compliance Manager

Hussmann Corporation

12999 St. Charles Rock Road

Bridgeton, MO 63044

314.298.6483

ron_shebik@hussmann.com

From: Raymond, Michael [mailto:Michael.Raymond@ ee.doe.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 7:38 AM

To: Shebik, Ronald; AS_Waiver_Requests; Armstrong, Ashley; Llenza, Charles

Subject: RE: Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver

- Hussmann Bulk Produce Cases



### Mr. Shebik,

Please mod ify your petition for waiver and application for interim waiver to include test

temperatures for each basic model. T he equipment should be tested at the closest

integrated average temperature to the rating temperature which it can achieve in a

repeatable manner. This could correspond to the lowest thermostat setting or lowest

temperature at which the equipment is to be operated in the field.

Michael G. Raymond, PhD

Building Technologies Program

Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

U.S. Department of Energy

Room 6053, 950 L'Enfant Plaza

Washington DC 20585

tel: 202

- 586

- 9611

michael.raymond@ee.doe.gov

From: Shebik, Ronald [mailto:ron_shebik@irco.com]

Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 6:14 PM

To: Raymond, Michael; AS_Waiver_Requests; Armstrong, Ashley; Llenza, Charles

Subject: Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver

- Hussmann Bulk Produce Cases

Mr. Raymo nd, Ms. Armstrong, Mr. LlenzaI have attached the Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver documents. Please let me

know if you have any questions or any further action is needed.

Thank you,

Ron Shebik

Regulatory Compliance Manager

Hus smann Corporation

12999 St. Charles Rock Road

Bridgeton, MO 63044

314.298.6483

ron_shebik@hussmann.com

The information contained in this message is privileged and intended only for the recipients named. If the reader is not a re presentative of the

intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or the information it contains is prohibited. If you have rec eived this

message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete the original message and attachments.

The information contained in this message is privileged and intended only for the recipients named. If the read er is not a representative of the

intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or the information it contains is prohibited. If you have received this

message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete the origin al message and attachments.
Victor Salastier DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.