alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 927 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 927

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 13, 2023.
Whereas, on October 7, 2023, the world witnessed Hamas terrorists perpetrate the 
        deadliest attack against the Jewish people since the Holocaust;
Whereas, in the months since, the Anti-Defamation League has recorded 2,031 
        antisemitic incidents, 400 of which occurred on college campuses, a more 
        than 330-percent increase from the year prior;
Whereas Jewish and Israeli students have faced physical violence, hate-filled 
        disruptions in the classroom, calls from students and faculty advocating 
        for the elimination and destruction of Israel, and other forms of 
        persistent harassment;
Whereas, according to a recent study from the Anti-Defamation League and Hillel 
        International, 73 percent of Jewish college students surveyed have 
        experienced or witnessed some form of antisemitism on campus since the 
        beginning of the school year, up from 32 percent the prior year;
Whereas many university administrations have failed to address the rise of 
        antisemitism;
Whereas to hold universities accountable, the House Committee on Education and 
        the Workforce held a hearing on December 5, 2023;
Whereas, when the Presidents of the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard 
        University, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology were asked if 
        calling for the genocide of Jews violates university policies on 
        bullying and harassment, Presidents Elizabeth Magill, Claudine Gay, and 
        Sally Kornbluth were evasive and dismissive, failing to simply condemn 
        such action;
Whereas President Magill stated, ``It is a context-dependent decision'';
Whereas President Gay insisted that it ``depends on the context'';
Whereas President Kornbluth responded it would only constitute harassment if it 
        were ``targeted at individuals'';
Whereas President Magill has resigned, and the other Presidents should follow 
        suit; and
Whereas acts of hate, intimidation, discrimination, and violence-based on 
        ethnicity or religion have no place in our country or in the global 
        community: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) strongly condemns the rise of antisemitism on university 
        campuses around the country; and
            (2) strongly condemns the testimony of University of Pennsylvania 
        President Elizabeth Magill, Harvard University President Claudine Gay, 
        and Massachusetts Institute of Technology President Sally Kornbluth and 
        their failure to clearly state that calls for the genocide of Jews 
        constitute harassment and violate their institutions' codes of conduct 
        in front of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce on 
        December 5, 2023.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Tarik MCMASTERS

NO. 2018-KK-0334

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 2018

Denied.
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0171**



### Contacts. **With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?**
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


CHINA VoIP & DIGITAL TELECOM INC.



DIRECTOR'

S CERTIFICATE







The undersigned hereby certifies that he is 

a

 duly elected, qualified and acting 

Director

 of China VoIP & Digital Telecom Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate in the name and on behalf of the Company and in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 

21,

 2007, by and among the Company and the investors listed on the Schedule of Buyers attached thereto (the "Securities Purchase Agreement"), and further certifies in his official capacity, in the name and on behalf of the Company, the items set forth below.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement.

1.

Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true, correct and complete copy of the resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting of the Board of Directors held on December 21, 2007.  Such resolutions have not in any way been amended, modified, revoked or rescinded, have been in full force and effect since their adoption to and including the date hereof and are now in full force and effect. 

2.

Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true, correct and complete copy of the Articles of Incorporation of the Company, together with any and all amendments thereto currently in effect, and no action has been taken to further amend, modify or repeal such Articles of Incorporation, the same being in full force and effect in the attached form as of the date hereof. 

3.

Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true, correct and complete copy of the Bylaws of the Company and any and all amendments thereto currently in effect, and no action has been taken to further amend, modify or repeal such Bylaws, the same being in full force and effect in the attached form as of the date hereof.








4.

Each person listed below has been duly elected or appointed to the position(s) indicated opposite his name and is duly authorized to sign the Securities Purchase Agreement and each of the Transaction Documents on behalf of the Company, and the signature appearing opposite such person’s name below is such person’s genuine signature.




			
	Name

	Position

	Signature




	

Li Kunwu



	Chief Executive Officer

	_________________________


	 
	 
	 









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand as of this 21st day of December 2007.












Wang Qinghua





Director









I, 

Li Kunwu, Chief Executive Officer

, hereby certify that 

Wang Qinghua

 is 

a

 duly elected, qualified and acting 

Director

 of the Company and that the signature set forth above is his true signature.









Li Kunwu





Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15964-15965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC09-50-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Filing

April 1, 2009.
    Take notice that on March 16, 2009, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG) submitted a request for approval of its accounting treatment for 
changes in deferred tax balances. These adjustments result from the 
formation of a master limited partnership, El Paso Pipeline Partners, 
L.P., and its acquisition of approximately a 2 percent

[[Page 15965]]

partnership interest in CIG during the formation process, along with a 
corresponding Internal Revenue Code Section 754 election. CIG states 
these adjustments reduce its deferred tax balances and increase its 
equity by approximately $3 million.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bdddec9d8d4f5f7f2f5fec8eeebebf4e9efdbfdfee9f8b5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a1c1f081915343633343f092f2a2a35282e1a3c3f2839743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 16, 2009.

Kimberly Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-7894 Filed 4-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the Company)
      for
      the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the Report), I, Bret H. Krevolin, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this periodic report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      issuer.




Date:
                  August 8, 2008
                  
                  
                  By:
                  /s/
                            Bret H. KrevolinBret
                            H. KrevolinChief
                            Financial
                            Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Amspec Services LLC, 12154 B River Road, St. Rose, LA 70087, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov*. Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories:                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                    

# DATES:

                        The accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on December 4, 2008. The next triennial                               ( print page 15505)                            inspection date will be scheduled for December 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randall Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: March 10, 2009.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E9-7627 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-06-P
Steven BEEBE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2114

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of prohibition is dismissed.
#### Mia WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-16822.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Mia White, San Ramon, CA, pro se.

*753Christopher Kee, Esq., Office of the City Attorney, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant Mia White appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Defendant in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the Oakland Police Department violated her equal protection rights on the basis of her race and .gender. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review summary judgment de novo, *Weiner v. San Diego County,*210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for Defendant because White did not present evidence to demonstrate that there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding a custom or policy of discrimination by the Oakland Police Department. *See Trevino v. Gates,*99 F.3d 911, 920 (9th Cir.1996) (because Plaintiff “failed to establish a ‘custom or policy,’ we need not analyze whether the alleged policy or custom was the cause in fact and the proximate cause of the constitutional deprivation,” and the city is entitled to judgment as a matter of law).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Lloyd WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4563

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

*Notice is hereby given*                     that I have delegated to the Director of the Office for Civil Rights, or his or her successor, the authorities vested in the Secretary concerning enforcement of and compliance with Section 1303(b)(4) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. 18023(b)(4). This delegation transfers, but only for the authorities pursuant to Section 1303(b)(4) and not for other authorities under Section 1303, the previous delegation to the Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or his or her successor, noticed at 76 FR 53903 (Aug. 30, 2011).                

Pursuant to this delegation, the OCR Director shall have the authority to:

(1) Accept and investigate complaints filed by individuals or entities alleging a failure to comply with Section 1303(b)(4);

(2) conduct Section 1303(b)(4) compliance reviews;

(3) provide technical assistance to departmental components and qualified health plans regarding Section 1303(b)(4) compliance;

(4) evaluate the effectiveness of subsection 1303(b)(4) complaint processing by OCR and provide reports to appropriate oversight organizations; and

(5) initiate such other actions as may be necessary to facilitate and ensure compliance with Section 1303(b)(4).

This authority may be redelegated. If the OCR Director chooses to redelegate this authority, the OCR Director will maintain primary responsibility and accountability for implementation of this section. This delegation is effective upon date of signature. I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Director of OCR or subordinates which involved the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective day of this delegation.

Dated: December 7, 2017.

Eric D. Hargan,

Acting Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.

[FR Doc. 2018-00818 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4153-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50566

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELDON RUSSELL HAYLOCK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-95-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Eldon Russell Haylock appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Haylock contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been

alleged in his indictment. Haylock maintains that he pleaded
No. 03-50566

-2-

guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for

that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Haylock acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 99.1


                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For DaimlerChrysler NA Holding
Securities, Series 2004-10 (the "Trust"), certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in respect
            of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports filed in
            respect of the Trust during the 2005 calendar year;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
            provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the trust
            agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge,
            except as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has
            fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

      5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
            Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar
            standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
            accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
            Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
            procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement, that is included
            in these reports.

Date: March 30, 2006

By:    /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
     -----------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President
Teresa M. GAFFNEY & Sarah K. Sussman, Individually and as Trustee of the Sussman Family Trust, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Phillip BAUMANN, Administrator ad litem of the Estate of John J. Gaffney, Deceased, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3849

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.