alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41517 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDWARD NEILSEN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-14-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Edward Neilsen has filed a motion and brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Neilsen has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Lemuel L. COLE, Appellant, v. Monica STINSON AAG, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3709

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Trolis KIRBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-571

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
D.M.M., the child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1494

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Bryan Lee DANIEL

1151282 (CR-15-0877)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11

             BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE COMPUTATION



                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                         MARCH 31, 2000       MARCH 31, 2000
                                       -------------------  ------------------
                                          BASIC/DILUTED       BASIC/DILUTED
                                       -------------------  ------------------
<S>                                    <C>                  <C>
Average outstanding shares                         53,503              51,335
Dilutive options outstanding, net                       -                   -
                                       -------------------  ------------------
Equivalent Shares                                  53,503              51,335
                                       ===================  ==================

Net income (loss) available to common
  stockholders                                    ($2,215)           ($21,387)
                                       ===================  ==================
Earnings (loss) per share              $            (0.04)  $           (0.42)
                                       ===================  ==================
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                    MARCH 31, 1999      MARCH 31, 1999
                                   -----------------  -----------------
                                    BASIC   DILUTED    BASIC   DILUTED
                                   -------  --------  -------  --------
<S>                                <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
Average outstanding shares          48,043    48,043   47,855    47,855
Dilutive options outstanding, net        -     2,938        -     1,331
                                   -------  --------  -------  --------
Equivalent Shares                   48,043    50,981   47,855    49,186
                                   =======  ========  =======  ========

Net income                         $   294  $    294  $   783  $    783
                                   =======  ========  =======  ========
Earnings per share                 $  0.01  $   0.01  $  0.02  $   0.02
                                   =======  ========  =======  ========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.4
​
IBM
Executive Sign-on Payment Repayment Agreement
This form must be completed in order to receive your Sign-On Payment.
​
	​
​


	​
​



	Employee Name
​


	Phone
​



	Gary Cohn
	(XXX)XXX-XXXX
E-Mail Address

	​


	XXXX@XXXXXXX.com



	Resident Location
​
New York, NY
	Work Location
​
U.S.



​
Prior to receiving any payment, I understand and agree to the following terms:
​
	●	I am eligible to receive a sign-on payment in the total amount of $2,000,000.00. The payment will be made in installments as identified in the schedule below.

	●	Each installment payment is earned on the earned date identified in the schedule below.

	●	Except as otherwise provided below, if my employment with IBM ends within one year after my date of hire, I will repay to IBM the first installment payment. Except as otherwise provided below, if my employment with IBM ends before the second anniversary of my date of hire, I will repay to IBM the second installment payment.

		●	However, in the event that my employment with IBM terminates on account of my death or disability, or is terminated by IBM for any reason or no reason, other than as on account of a for “Cause” termination (as defined in Attachment A to my offer letter signed as of the even date herewith), the repayment requirements mentioned above will not apply.

	●	If I take a leave of absence from working for IBM on an active basis before the payment earned date or during the repayment period, the payment earned date and my obligation to repay the relevant installment payment will be extended for the period of the leave of absence.

​
To the extent permitted by law, I also authorize IBM to deduct any unearned sign-on payment balance, less any tax withholdings, owed to IBM from any funds IBM may owe me at the time of my departure, such as wages, commissions, vacation, or bonus payments. If, after IBM has deducted the amount from funds owed to me at the time of my departure, a balance owed to IBM remains, I shall repay the balance to IBM.
​
This Sign-on Payment Repayment Agreement does not constitute a contract of employment or create or grant any right to continued employment with IBM for any period of time. My employment remains “at will” and may be ended at any time by IBM or me, for any reason or no reason, with or without notice.
​
	Payment Amount
	Payment Date
	Payment Earned Date

	$1,000,000.00
	In 2020, no later than December 31, 2020.
	First anniversary of date of hire

	$1,000,000.00


	In 2021 after the 1 year anniversary of employment, but no later than December 31, 2021


	Second anniversary of date of hire





​
	Employee Signature
/s/Gary Cohn
​


	Date
12/24/20





​
​
	*IBM Confidential When Completed
	December 2020



​
Matthew ARCHER, Appellant, v. SANDALWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and Florida Housing Finance Corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D17-347

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10 - Q/A

                               AMENDMENT TO REPORT
                    Filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         MEDICAL ACTION INDUSTRIES INC.
               -------------------------------------------------
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned Registrant hereby amends the following exhibit of its June
30, 2003 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as set forth in the pages attached
hereto:

     Part II - Other Information

     Item 6
     ------

     (a)  Exhibits

          99.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as Adopted Pursuant
               to Section 302(a)

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                              MEDICAL ACTION INDUSTRIES INC.
                                              ------------------------------
                                                       (Registrant)


Date: August 11, 2003                     By: /s/ Richard G. Satin
      ---------------                         ------------------------------
                                              Richard G. Satin
                                              (Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

IN THE INTEREST OF: ADOPTION OF: 

S.R.M. 

PETITION OF: R.M.B., FATHER 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 194 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Discoveries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Judy M. Robinett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
principal financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 /S/  JUDY M. ROBINETT
-------------------------------------
Judy M. Robinett
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003



                                       13
Edward ROSEMAN, an individual, Appellant, v. GANDY HARBOR I, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Gandy Harbor II, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Gandy Harbor III, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Seahorse of Treasure Island, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; and Ronald L. Roseman, an individual, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-1502

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Simon Lee FRANK v. STATE

CR-15-0771

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John A. Riley, III, President and
Chief Executive Officer and Michael Duke, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cullman Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the annual report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and that to the best of their knowledge:



|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                  
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|March 18, 2011 |  | /s/ John A. Riley, III                           
|Date           |  | John A. Riley, III                               
|               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|               | 
|March 18, 2011 |  | /s/ Michael Duke                                 
|Date           |  | Michael Duke                                     
|               |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cullman Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Cullman Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



96
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14a AND 15d-14a
OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Daniel E. OBrien, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TRM
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date:  November 12, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Daniel E. O'BrienDaniel E. O'BrienChief Financial Officer 38
Edward P LUECK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2074

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Monroe Adam MEYERS, III

NO. 2018-KH-0171

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Writ not considered. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1012 

To authorize Offices of Inspectors General to continue operations during 

a lapse in appropriations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize Offices of Inspectors General to continue operations during a lapse in appropriations, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep the Watchdogs 

5 Running Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1012 IS

1 SEC. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OVERSIGHT DURING LAPSE 

2 IN APPROPRIATIONS. 

3 Section 6(g) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 

4 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(4)(A) In this paragraph, the term ‘covered lapse 

7 in appropriations’ has the meaning given the term in sec8 tion 1341(c) of title 31, United States Code. 

9 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and 

10 in addition to any other authority, during a covered lapse 

11 in appropriations, an Inspector General may incur obliga12 tions in advance of appropriations for such amounts as 

13 may be necessary, at a rate for operations as provided in 

14 the most recently enacted appropriations Acts and under 

15 the authority and conditions provided in such Acts, to per16 form the duties of the Office with respect to programs and 

17 operations of the establishment that continue during the 

18 covered lapse in appropriations.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Adrian BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1850

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document

Exhibit 10.14


ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION
INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY


Summary of Compensation and Benefits for
Non-Employee Directors
Effective January 1, 2022


Effective January 1, 2022, the aggregate compensation for non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Alliant Energy Corporation, Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company will be as follows:
Non-employee members of the Board will be entitled to receive the following annual retainers as applicable:
•$260,000 for each non-employee director;
•$30,000 for the Lead Independent Director of the Board;
•$20,000 for the Chairperson of each the Audit Committee and the Compensation and Personnel Committee of the Board;
•$5,000 for each member of the Audit Committee of the Board other than the Chairperson;
•$15,000 for the Chairperson of each the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Operations Committee of the Board.


Payments of all retainers shall be in cash and shall be paid quarterly in advance.


Each director may, and is encouraged to, voluntarily elect an amount of any of the cash compensation retainers to purchase common stock of Alliant Energy Corporation under the Shareowner Direct Plan or to have an amount be deferred in the Alliant Energy Deferred Compensation Plan Stock Account.


Alliant Energy Corporation maintains a Director’s Charitable Award Program for directors who were elected or appointed to the Board on or prior to January 1, 2005.  Under the Program, when a director dies, Alliant Energy Corporation will donate a total of $500,000 to one qualified charitable organization or divide that amount among a maximum of five qualified charitable organizations selected by the individual director.  All deductions for charitable contributions are taken by Alliant Energy Corporation, and the donations are funded by Alliant Energy Corporation through life insurance policies on the directors.


Directors are eligible to participate in the Alliant Energy matching gift programs, which are generally available to all eligible employees and/or retirees.  Under these programs, Alliant Energy or the Alliant Energy Foundation provides matching funds to eligible charities based on contributions from the Directors.


Directors are reimbursed for travel and other necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their responsibilities as members of the Board of Directors.
Dennis HUTTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2536

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ALPS SOUTH, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Tyrone PASTURES, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-5104

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1-CERTIFICATION


                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                          and Chief Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I,  the undersigned
Chief  Financial Officer of  Sealife Corporation.  (the "Company"),  hereby
certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB
of the Company  for  the  quarter ended  November 30,  2003  (the "Report")
fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results
of operations of the Company.



By:   /s/ Robert McCaslin
          ---------------
          Robert McCaslin
          Chief Financial Officer

Date:    February 12, 2004
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03701

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 03701\03701_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03701\03701_Completeness_Checklist.XLS EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03701\03701_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03701\03701_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03701\03701_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03701\Certification Statement Plant ID_03701.PDF Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Cedrick L. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 9, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Terri SKILES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Wesley Skiles, deceased, Appellant, v. LAMARTEK, INC., d/b/a Dive Rite, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.