alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                         111,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     66,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,586
<PP&E>                                         372,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                 187,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 434,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           561
<OTHER-SE>                                     385,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   434,263
<SALES>                                         87,029
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,029
<CGS>                                           41,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
Carl SCHULTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3578

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 99.15**

 
|  |   | SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.

1066 West Hastings St, 22nd Flr.

Vancouver, BC, Canada

V6E 3X2

 

T: +1.604.681.4196

F: +1.604.687.5532

vancouver@srk.com

www.srk.com |
|--|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**CONSENT OF CAM SCOTT**

 

In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 40-F (the “Form 40-F”) of Franco-Nevada Corporation with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, I consent to the references to my name, including under the heading “Experts,” and to the use of the technical report entitled “Technical Report for the Compañía Contractual Minera Candelaria and Compañía Contractual Minera Ojos del Salado Copper Projects, Atacama Province, Region III, Chile,” dated October 6, 2014 (the “Report”), and the information derived from the Report, included in the 2014 Annual Information Form of Franco-Nevada Corporation dated March 25, 2015 (the “AIF”), which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated by reference in, the Form 40-F.

 

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-190109), on Form S-8 (No. 333-176856) and on Form F-10 (No. 333-191835) of the references to my name in the AIF and the use of the Report and the information derived therefrom.

 

 
| DATED:   March 25, 2015     |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   |
| * *                         |   |
| *[Cameron   C. Scott]*           |   |
| Name:   Cameron C. Scott, P.Eng. |   |

 
|   | **Local Offices:**

Saskatoon

Sudbury

Toronto

Vancouver

Yellowknife

** ** | **Group Offices:**

Africa

Asia

Australia

Europe

North America

South America |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Joanne Cox ADAMS and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Respondents.

Case No. 2D16-4961

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EX PARTE Randall Timothy DOWNS

1160129 (CR-15-0471)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Jeffrey SHAPIRO, D.C. derivatively ON BEHALF OF CHIROPRACTIC SPINAL HEALTH, INC., Appellant, v. Dr. Garrett WEINSTEIN, D.C., Garrett R. Weinstein, D.C.P.A. and Chiropractic Spinal Health, Inc., Appellee.

No. 4D16-2482

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification ofChief Financial Officer ofAdvance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advance America, Cash AdvanceCenters, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John I.Hill, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|          | /s/  John I.  Hill        |   |
|----------|--------------------------------|--------|
|          | John I. Hill                   |
| * * | *Executive Vice President and* |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer*      |

 

March 1, 2007

----
August 6, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC, 20590

RE: Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of

2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 - Public Interest Addendum

Dear Madam, Sir,

This addendum to the 333 Exemption Request is to provide more details as to why granting this

exemption would benefit the public as a whole. The activities that BST proposes under this 333 are to

conduct data gathering for agricultural applications, aerial inspections, mapping, surveying, R&D and

product demonstrations.

Granting this exemption would benefit the public as a whole. The small unmanned aircraft systems

(sUAS) in this application offer a strong equivalent level of safety to manned aircraft, and a reduction in

environmental impacts compared with the manned aircraft that are currently used for aerial data collection.

Due to the size of the sUAS and the tightly controlled and limited airspace in which they will operate,

approval of this application presents no risk to the public. Furthermore, the public will be able to legally

acquire aerial data that can be used to increase agricultural yields, rapidly find problems with gas pipelines,

obtain survey and mapping data at a lower cost and higher frequency, along with many other benefits.

Sincerely,

Jack Elston

CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1999
<CASH>                                       4,112,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,124,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,323,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,583,000
<PP&E>                                     194,144,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              75,821,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             390,446,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,305,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       276,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 153,177,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               390,446,000
<SALES>                                    114,544,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           114,544,000
<CGS>                                       30,123,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,123,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            73,688,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               500,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,955,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,286,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,552,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,734,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,734,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
#### Afsar HOSSAIN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70789.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*771Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Reynold E. Finnegan, Esq., Finnegan & Diba, A Law Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Patricia A. Smith, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Afsar Hossain, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We review de novo all questions of law with regard to the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), but give substantial deference to the agency’s interpretation. *Melkonian v. Ashcroft,*320 F.3d 1061, 1065 (9th Cir.2003). We dismiss the petition for review.

This Court lacks jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that no “extraordinary circumstances” excused Petitioner’s untimely filing of his asylum application, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D), as this court is barred from reviewing any determination made by the IJ pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2). *See id.*§ 1158(a)(3); *Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.2002).

This court also lacks jurisdiction to review Petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s denial of withholding of removal and CAT relief because Petitioner did not raise these claims before the BIA or before this Court. *See Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 815 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001).

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), Petitioner’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the motion for stay of removal was granted, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, nunc pro tunc, to the filing of the motion for stay of removal and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 54
          - [WC Docket No. 17-310; FCC 17-164]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission (Commission) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 3, 2018 seeking comment on how to strengthen the Rural Health Care Program and improve access to telehealth in rural America. The document contained an incorrect reply comment date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Radhika Karmarkar, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-7400 or TTY: (202) 418-0484.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 3, 2018, in FR Doc. 2017-28298, on page 303, in the first column, correct the                         **DATES**                         caption to read:                    

# DATES:

Comments are due on or before February 2, 2018, and reply comments are due on or before March 5, 2018. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this document, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

Federal Communications Commission.

Katura Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-00451 Filed 1-16-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.G. Barry Corporation for the
Quarterly period ended April 2, 2011;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: May 11, 2011
    /s/ José G. IbarraPrinted Name:
    José G. IbarraTitle:
    Senior Vice President  Finance and 
Chief
Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Agreement



This Agreement is made as of the 13th day of March, 2003 between Shanghai Teachers Training Centre (the Shanghai) and Todays Teachers Technology and Culture Ltd. (the TTTC).



Whereas:



Both parties agree to jointly develop national grade A kindergarten curriculum and teachers manual. Details as follows:



1.

Shanghai is responsible for the development of the curriculum and the teachers manual, and the work should be completed within one year period. Detailed development requirements shall be confirmed by the final outline in due course;



2.

TTTC is responsible for the development cost including a RMB120,000 startup fund which should be paid to Shanghai in two installments;



3.

TTTC is responsible for the consulting fee and the conference cost of RMB60,000, authors remuneration fee of RMB100 per 1,000 characters, drawing fee of RMB50 per picture, and the fees for editing and processing;



4.

The copyrights of the curriculum and the teachers manual and the right to select publisher as well as the distribution right all belong to TTTC. TTTC shall pay Shanghai a royalty which is equivalent to 1% of annual retail revenue;



5.

TTTC is responsible for the training of the curriculum and the teachers manual. The Parties will sign separate agreement with regard to the training plan and cost;



6.

The contents of the curriculum and the teachers manual shall be Shanghais own original contents. If there is any piracy or other violations of copyright, Shanghai shall take all the responsibilities and hold harmless and indemnify TTTC from the damages.



This agreement has an eight years term effective from the date both parties have duly executed this Agreement, as of the 13th day of March,, 2003.





Shanghai:

Signature





TTTC:

Signature
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6877

STEVEN EDWARD SNIPES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-01-983-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2002 Decided: December 13, 2002

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Edward Snipes, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Edward Snipes seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Snipes has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right. See Snipes v. Beck, No.

CA-01-983-1 (M.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2002; entered May 14, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                     SURGE COMPONENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                                                -----------------------------------
                                                                                 February 28,        February 29,
                                                                                     2001                2000
                                                                                ---------------    ----------------
<S>                                                                             <C>                <C>
Basic earnings:
   Net (loss) income.........................................................   $   (2,093,265)    $       819,084

Shares:
   Weighted common shares outstanding........................................        6,644,336           4,888,535
                                                                                ---------------    ----------------

Basic earnings per common share..............................................   $         (.32)    $           .17
                                                                                ===============    ================

Diluted earnings:
   Net (loss) income.........................................................   $   (2,093,265)    $       819,084
   Add interest expense on convertible debt..................................               --             163,841
                                                                                ---------------    ----------------
Net (loss) income and assumed conversion.....................................       (2,093,265)            982,925
                                                                                ---------------    ----------------

Shares:
   Weighted common shares outstanding........................................        6,644,336           4,888,535
   Employees stock options...................................................               --           1,841,457
   Convertible notes.........................................................               --             988,879
                                                                                ---------------    ----------------

Total weighted shares outstanding............................................        6,644,336           7,718,871
                                                                                ---------------    ----------------

Diluted earnings per common share............................................   $         (.32)    $           .11
                                                                                ===============    ================
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




(i)
  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and




(ii)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      November 20, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Bruce NelsonBruce
      Nelson
                Chief
      Financial Officer