alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   |  (1) |   |  the 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                          |
|--------|-----------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (2)       |   | the information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                      |                          |   |   |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                      |                          |   |
| Date: March 30, 2011 | /s/ Carl Kukkonen             |   |
|                      | Carl Kukkonen            |   |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|                      |
|                      |                          |   |
| Date: March 30, 2011 | /s/ Stephen J. Muzi           |   |
|                      | Stephen J. Muzi          |   |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer  |   |
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the Company)
      for
      the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the Report), I, Bret H. Krevolin, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this periodic report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      issuer.





Date:November 9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Bret H. KrevolinBret
                H. Krevolin
              Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to QNB Corp. and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Santino Aguirre, Brenda Echavarria, * From the County Court and Leroy Aguirre, at Law of Tom Green County,

Trial Court No. 11C458

- L

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00253

- CV * May 30, 2014

Scott S. Aguirre and Irma S. Aguirre, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error

in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance wit h this court ’ s opinion, the

judgment of the trial court is reversed

, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for

further proceedings consistent with the opinion . The costs incurred by reason of this

appe al are taxed against Scott S. Aguirre and Irma S. Aguirre.
Joseph GALLARDO, Appellant, v. SUGARLAND PLAZA, INC., and Royal United Properties, Inc., d/b/a Royal Companies, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4006

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Thomas KWIATKOWSKI, Appellant, v. WALGREENS CO., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1245

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.6
 AMENDMENT NO. 6
TO
CREDIT AGREEMENT
     Certain Definitions
 Borrowing Base.
   Borrowing Base Certificate Exhibit A.
 Eligible Accounts.




---



##### 



Maturity Date.
 Miscellaneous
  M&I
    
    Marshall & Ilsley Bank
    
    Winland
    
    Electronics, Inc.By
    
    /s/ Doug Pudvah
    
    By
    
    /s/ Jennifer A. ThompsonDoug Pudvah
    
    
    
    Jennifer A. ThompsonIts Vice President
    
    
    
    Its Chief Financial OfficerBy
    
    /s/ John W. Howard, Jr.John W. HowardIts Senior Vice President
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Borrowing Base Certificate
 TotalAccounts Receivable Balance (As of_______)
    
    
    $___Less: Over 90 days past invoice dateCross-Age (> 10% past due, contra, 15% concentration, 40%
Concentration on Select Comfort)Other ineligibleTotal Ineligible A/R
    
    
    $___Eligible Accounts Receivable
    
    
    $___Available A/R at 80%
    
    
    $___Inventory Value (As of )
    
    
    $___Less: WIP InventoryOther ineligibleTotal Ineligible Inventory
    
    
    $___Eligible Inventory
    
    
    $___Available Inventory at 50% (capped at $1,500,000)
    
    
    $___Borrowing Base Availability (before Cap)
Capped at $2,500,000
    
    
    $___Borrowing Base Availability (after Cap)
    
    
    $___Less: Letters of CreditLess: Outstanding AdvancesNet Availability
    
    
    $___
 - 3 -
Gregory Javoris WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2034

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1056 

To give Federal courts additional discretion to determine whether pretrial 

detention is appropriate for defendants charged with nonviolent drug 

offenses in Federal criminal cases. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. LEE, Mr. COONS, and Mr. WICKER) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To give Federal courts additional discretion to determine 

whether pretrial detention is appropriate for defendants 

charged with nonviolent drug offenses in Federal criminal cases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Smarter Pretrial De5 tention for Drug Charges Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1056 IS

1 SEC. 2. RELEASE CONDITIONS AND DETENTION IN FED2 ERAL CRIMINAL CASES. 

3 Section 3142 of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(42 U.S.C. 14135a)’’ each 

6 place it appears and inserting ‘‘(34 U.S.C. 40702)’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) in subsection (e)(3)— 

9 (A) by striking subparagraph (A); and 

10 (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), 

11 (C), (D), and (E) as subparagraphs (A), (B), 

12 (C), and (D), respectively. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:03 AM

To: 'derricknevot@yahoo.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Inform ation - Aerial Experts LLC

Dear Mr. Nevot:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 2264). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter than air) for the proposed

UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be

located in the aircraft manual(s).

• Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed set filming

from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/27/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
Jarred Lamont WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5493

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         986,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  995,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                   485,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,406,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,052,610
<PP&E>                                       3,170,781
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,667,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,622,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,288,834
<BONDS>                                     37,113,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,500
<COMMON>                                       810,975
<OTHER-SE>                                (33,291,005)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,622,335
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,593,412
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,833,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,769,154
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,433
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,754,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,009,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,009,309)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,009,309)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)
        

</TABLE>
Payman TABIB, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Trustee as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, National Association as Trustee for WAMU Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-HY7 Trust, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3287

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Adrian Lorenzo THOMAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1792

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 61282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27918]



[[Page 61282]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14826-001]


Merchant Hydro Developers, LLC; Notice of Surrender of 
Preliminary Permit

    Take notice that Merchant Hydro Developers, LLC, permittee for the 
proposed Hudson Hill Pumped Storage Hydro Project, has requested that 
its preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was issued on 
September 5, 2017, and would have expired on August 31, 2020.\1\ The 
project would have been located near Jackson Township in Lycoming 
County, Pennsylvania.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 160 FERC 62,203 (2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The preliminary permit for Project No. 14826 will remain in effect 
until the close of business, January 19, 2018. But, if the Commission 
is closed on this day, then the permit remains in effect until the 
close of business on the next day in which the Commission is open.\2\ 
New applications for this site may not be submitted until after the 
permit surrender is effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2017).

    Dated: December 20, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-27918 Filed 12-26-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONI, Greg A. Tunney, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R. G. Barry Corporation for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2006; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [Reserved]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  November 9, 2006 /s/ Greg A. Tunney   Name:  Greg A. Tunney   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Erik J. HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-931

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report of Clovis Oncology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), Erle T. Mast, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 14, 2012
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADDED BY
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas J.
Bisko, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this periodic report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.
 Date:
      August 14, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Thomas J. BiskoThomas
      J. BiskoPresident
      and CEO
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 1611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00458]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Record of Decision for the F-35A Operational Beddown--Pacific, 
Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska

AGENCY: Pacific Air Forces, Department of the Air Force.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a record of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Air Force signed the Record of Decision for 
the F-35A Operational Beddown--Pacific, for the Eielson Air Force Base, 
Alaska Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement on December 
19, 2017. The Record of Decision reflects the Air Force decision to 
implement the three Proposed Action Alternatives: provide additional 
stormwater runoff control; develop equipment and material laydown 
areas; and provide additional heat, water, and power to the South Loop.
    The decision was based on matters discussed in the F-35A 
Operational Beddown--Pacific, Final Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement, contributions from the public and regulatory agencies, and 
other relevant factors. The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement was made available to the public on October 6, 2017 through a 
Notice of Availability published in the Federal Register (82 FR 46808) 
with a 30-day wait period that ended on November 6, 2017.
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Hamid Kamalpour, AFCEC/CZN, 
2261 Hughes Ave, Ste 155, JBSA Lackland, TX 78236, ph: 210-925-2738.
    Authority: This Notice of Availability is published pursuant to the 
regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) and 
the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (32 CFR parts 
989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).

Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-00458 Filed 1-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
James Allen BREMMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2030

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.3 - Trust Agreement with Woodburn Holdings Ltd.





Exhibit 10.3

 

WOODBURN HOLDINGS LTD.

885 Pyrford Road

West Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V7S 2A2

 

May 31, 2007

 

International Gold Corp. 

789 West Pender Street, Suite 1010

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V6C 1H2

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

RE:    Declaration of Trust

     Woodburn Holdings Ltd. holds in trust for International Gold Corp., a 100% undivided interest in the following claim:


	  	Date of  	Date of  
	Claim No.  	Recording  	Expiration  
	516362  	December 10, 2004  	December 25, 2008  




     Woodburn Holdings Ltd. will deliver full title on demand to International Gold Corp. for as long as the claims are in good standing with the Province of British Columbia.



Yours truly,



ROBERT M. BAKER

Robert M. Baker

President of Woodburn Holdings Ltd.
M.G., etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. F.G., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0373

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 02, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 3, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 404 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-99, CP2018-141.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-28361 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
CYRIACKS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and DB Ecological Services, Inc., Appellees.

No. 1D17-707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.