CalPortland Cement Plant Units 1-4

Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions Relative to Base Used in Visibility Modeling 

All Units

Technology 

Used

-Emissions 

(TPY, annual)

Technology 

Used

-Emissions 

(TPY, annual)

-Emissions 

(TPY, annual)

$/year if using 

MAT

$/year if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 0 0 $ - $ -

LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1 LNB or MAT 561 0 561 $ 497,565 $ 1,317,024

SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2 SNCR 936 0 936 $ 725,007 $ 725,007

LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3 0 LNB or MAT 568 568 $ 234,701 $ 535,613

SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4 0 SNCR 947 947 $ 604,583 $ 604,583

Table 3a. NOx Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Units 1-3* (from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3a) Table 3b. NOx Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Unit 4 (from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3b) 

MAT LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR MAT or LNC LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR

capital $676,001 $2,708,493 $383,535 $3,092,028 capital $1,188,275 $3,427,320 $1,336,373 $4,763,693

Annualized Capital $63,809.67 $255,663 $36,203 $291,866 Annualized Capital $112,165 $323,515 $126,144 $449,659

FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $102,045 $183,345 $90,347 $198,686 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $122,536 $212,098 $128,460 $265,553

Reagent $115,120 $80,584 Reagent $349,978 $244,985

Total Cost, $/year $165,855 $439,008 $241,669 $571,136 Total Cost, $/year $234,701 $535,613 $604,583 $960,197

Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51%

tons reduced 187 187 312 318 tons reduced 568 568 947 966

$/ton reduced $887 $2,349 $776 $1,798 $/ton reduced $413 $943 $638 $994

Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $608 $3,098 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $976 $1,824

Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) ($1,584) $1,010 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $182 $1,067

lb/hr emission rate 111 111 79 77 lb/hr emission rate 336 336 240 235

* Values shown are per unit 

CalPortland Cement Units 1-4

visibility method 6, annual average background

Using dv from area with highest impact (12 areas)

if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $0.0 $0.0 1.2

LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1 561 $0.5 $1.3 $887 $2,348 1.0 0.12 $4.2 $11.1 0

SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2 936 $0.7 $0.7 $775 $775 1.0 0.19 $3.8 $3.8 0

LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3 568 $0.2 $0.5 $413 $943 1.0 0.13 $1.8 $4.1 0

SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4 947 $0.6 $0.6 $638 $638 0.9 0.22 $2.8 $2.8 0

(same tons & costs as above) Using dv sum over all areas (12 areas)

if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $0.0 $0.0 4.2

LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1 561 $0.5 $1.3 $887 $2,348 3.8 0.43 $1.2 $3.0

SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2 936 $0.7 $0.7 $775 $775 3.5 0.70 $1.0 $1.0

LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3 568 $0.2 $0.5 $413 $943 3.7 0.49 $0.5 $1.1

SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4 947 $0.6 $0.6 $638 $638 3.4 0.81 $0.7 $0.7

Controls Control 

Option

Units 1-3 Unit 4

Control 

Option

cost, $/yr (millions) $/ton reduction

All Units

cost, $/yr (millions) $/ton reduction visibility 

impact, dv 

visibility benefit, 

dv

# CIAs w/ 

improvement ≥ 

0.5 dv

Controls ton/yr 

reduction

$/dv (millions)

Controls Control 

Option

ton/yr 

reduction

visibility 

impact, dv 

visibility benefit, 

dv

$/dv (millions)
Chemical Lime Company Nelson Units 2 and 3

visibility method 6, annual average background

Table 1(a). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options

Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4

CIA Base Case

LNB or 

MAT u.1-3

SNCR u. 

1-3

LNB or 

MAT u.4 SNCR u.4 Base Case

LNB or 

MAT u.1-3

SNCR u. 1-

3

LNB or 

MAT u.4 SNCR u.4

chir Chiricahua NM 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.04

chrw Chiricahua 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.05

gali Galiuro 0.87 0.79 0.74 0.78 0.72 0.00 0.08 0.13 0.09 0.15

gila Gila 0.94 0.85 0.79 0.83 0.76 0.00 0.09 0.15 0.11 0.18

maza Mazatzal 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03

moba Mount Baldy 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02

pefo Petrified Forest 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02

pimo Pine Mountain 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02

sagu Saguaro 1.15 1.03 0.96 1.02 0.93 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.22

sian Sierra Ancha 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02

supe Superstition 0.28 0.24 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.05

syca Sycamore Canyon 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02

Total 4.22 3.79 3.51 3.72 3.41 0.00 0.43 0.70 0.49 0.81

Max 1.15 1.03 0.96 1.02 0.93 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.22

# CIAs w/ -dv ≥ 0.5 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0

# CIAs with visibility improvement ≥ 0.5 dv

Table 5(a). Control Opon Cost Effecveness (million $/dv)†

Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-4

CIA MAT u.1-3 LNB u.1-3

SNCR u. 

1-3 MAT u.4 LNB u.4 SNCR u.4

chir Chiricahua NM 23 60 19 9 21 14

chrw Chiricahua 17.8 47.0 16.9 7.6 17.3 11.9

gali Galiuro 6.4 16.9 5.5 2.6 6.0 4.1

gila Gila 5.6 14.8 4.8 2.1 4.8 3.4

maza Mazatzal 49.8 131.7 42.6 18.1 41.2 24.2

moba Mount Baldy 49.8 131.7 42.6 21.3 48.7 31.8

pefo Petrified Forest 45.2 119.7 42.6 21.3 48.7 33.6

pimo Pine Mountain 55.3 146.3 45.3 21.3 48.7 31.8

sagu Saguaro 4.2 11.1 3.8 1.8 4.1 2.8

sian Sierra Ancha 49.8 131.7 40.3 15.6 35.7 25.2 ($/yr) / (sum of dv benefits over all areas)

supe Superstition 13.8 36.6 14.2 7.3 16.7 12.6 ($/yr) / (max dv benefit of any area)

syca Sycamore Canyon 49.8 131.7 48.3 18.1 41.2 30.2

$/dv_sum 1.2 3.0 1.0 0.5 1.1 0.7

$/dv_max 4.2 11.1 3.8 1.8 4.1 2.8

†$/dv = $ per year from Table 2 divided by visibility improvement from Table 1(a) for each control option, in millions

Class I Area

98 Change relative to base (dv) th Percentile -dv

Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-3

Class I Area
Table 1(a). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) at Each Class I Area (CIA) Within CalPortland Cement Plant's Zone of Influence (300 km) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options (listed in Table 2)

CIA Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions Relative to Base Used in Visibility Modeling 

Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4

chir 0.204 0.180 0.164 0.176 0.157 0.024 0.040 0.028 0.047 0.209 0.185 0.168 0.182 0.163 0.024 0.041 0.027 0.046 0.199 0.177 0.162 0.176 0.161 0.022 0.037 0.023 0.038 0.204 0.182 0.165 0.178 0.161 0.022 0.039 0.026 0.043

chrw 0.207 0.183 0.168 0.178 0.159 0.024 0.039 0.029 0.048 0.290 0.251 0.225 0.254 0.228 0.039 0.065 0.036 0.062 0.215 0.186 0.167 0.188 0.171 0.029 0.048 0.027 0.044 0.223 0.195 0.180 0.192 0.172 0.028 0.043 0.031 0.051 Base 0 0 0 $0 $0

gali 0.843 0.748 0.684 0.744 0.667 0.095 0.159 0.099 0.176 1.085 0.968 0.889 0.940 0.842 0.117 0.196 0.145 0.243 0.797 0.704 0.641 0.695 0.627 0.093 0.156 0.102 0.170 0.871 0.793 0.740 0.782 0.724 0.078 0.131 0.089 0.147 Ctrl2-1 LNB or MAT 561 0 561 $497,565 $1,317,024

gila 0.873 0.775 0.709 0.771 0.696 0.098 0.164 0.102 0.177 1.129 1.008 0.930 0.979 0.877 0.121 0.199 0.150 0.252 0.826 0.730 0.665 0.721 0.650 0.096 0.161 0.105 0.176 0.937 0.848 0.787 0.825 0.757 0.089 0.150 0.112 0.180 Ctrl2-2 SNCR 936 0 936 $725,007 $725,007

maza 0.127 0.112 0.102 0.107 0.093 0.015 0.025 0.020 0.034 0.129 0.115 0.108 0.113 0.103 0.014 0.021 0.016 0.026 0.083 0.074 0.069 0.073 0.066 0.009 0.014 0.010 0.017 0.110 0.100 0.093 0.097 0.085 0.010 0.017 0.013 0.025 Ctrl2-3 0 LNB or MAT 568 568 $234,701 $535,613

moba 0.083 0.075 0.069 0.072 0.065 0.008 0.014 0.011 0.018 0.080 0.071 0.066 0.068 0.060 0.009 0.014 0.012 0.020 0.059 0.053 0.049 0.050 0.044 0.006 0.010 0.009 0.015 0.079 0.069 0.062 0.068 0.060 0.010 0.017 0.011 0.019 Ctrl2-4 0 SNCR 947 947 $604,583 $604,583

pefo 0.095 0.081 0.072 0.082 0.074 0.014 0.023 0.013 0.021 0.081 0.072 0.065 0.071 0.063 0.009 0.016 0.010 0.018 0.072 0.064 0.059 0.061 0.053 0.008 0.013 0.011 0.019 0.083 0.072 0.066 0.072 0.065 0.011 0.017 0.011 0.018

pimo 0.101 0.089 0.080 0.086 0.076 0.012 0.021 0.015 0.025 0.111 0.099 0.091 0.093 0.081 0.012 0.020 0.018 0.030 0.050 0.045 0.042 0.043 0.039 0.005 0.008 0.007 0.011 0.094 0.085 0.078 0.083 0.075 0.009 0.016 0.011 0.019 Table 3a. NOx Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Units 1-3* (from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3a) Table 3b. NOx Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Unit 4 (from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3b) 

sagu 1.142 0.989 0.895 1.022 0.934 0.153 0.247 0.120 0.208 1.216 1.099 1.012 1.102 1.043 0.117 0.204 0.114 0.173 0.953 0.858 0.794 0.882 0.834 0.095 0.159 0.071 0.119 1.152 1.033 0.962 1.022 0.934 0.119 0.190 0.130 0.218 MAT LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR MAT or LNC LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR

sian 0.119 0.110 0.100 0.107 0.095 0.009 0.019 0.012 0.024 0.120 0.110 0.104 0.099 0.090 0.010 0.016 0.021 0.030 0.101 0.090 0.082 0.088 0.079 0.011 0.019 0.013 0.022 0.113 0.103 0.095 0.098 0.089 0.010 0.018 0.015 0.024 capital $676,001 ######### $383,535 $3,092,028 capital $1,188,275 ######### ######### #########

supe 0.286 0.253 0.233 0.252 0.233 0.033 0.053 0.034 0.053 0.264 0.240 0.225 0.233 0.213 0.024 0.039 0.031 0.051 0.226 0.202 0.186 0.214 0.191 0.024 0.040 0.012 0.035 0.276 0.240 0.225 0.244 0.228 0.036 0.051 0.032 0.048 Annualized Capital $63,810 $255,663 $36,203 $291,866 Annualized Capital $112,165 $323,515 $126,144 $449,659

syca 0.081 0.071 0.064 0.068 0.060 0.010 0.017 0.013 0.021 0.078 0.071 0.068 0.067 0.060 0.007 0.010 0.011 0.018 0.052 0.046 0.041 0.045 0.040 0.006 0.011 0.007 0.012 0.075 0.065 0.060 0.062 0.055 0.010 0.015 0.013 0.020 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $102,045 $183,345 $90,347 $198,686 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $122,536 $212,098 $128,460 $265,553

Reagent $115,120 $80,584 Reagent $349,978 $244,985

sjb, 2012-10-08: To correctly reflect modeled controls, Ctrl2-1 and Ctrl2-2 were exchanged with Ctrl2-3 and Ctrl2-4, respectively. Total Cost, $/year $165,855 $439,008 $241,669 $571,136 Total Cost, $/year $234,701 $535,613 $604,583 $960,197

The columns now reflect EPA original names c21, c22, c23, c24, and POSTUTIL output ctrl3, ctrl4, ctrl1, and ctrl2, respectively. Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51%

tons reduced 187 187 312 318 tons reduced 568 568 947 966

$/ton reduced $887 $2,349 $776 $1,798 $/ton reduced $413 $943 $638 $994

Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $608 $3,098 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $976 $1,824

Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) ($1,584) $1,010 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $182 $1,067

lb/hr emission rate 111 111 79 77 lb/hr emission rate 336 336 240 235

* Values shown are per unit 

Units 1-3

-Emis 

(TPY)

98th Percentile -dv Change relative to base (dv) Change relative to base (dv)

$/year if 

using LNB

98th Percentile  All Units -dv 

Control

Unit 4

-Emis (TPY) -Emis 

(TPY)

$/year if 

using MAT

Control Option

Control

2001 2003

98th Percentile -dv Change relative to base (dv) 98th Percentile -dv Change relative to base (dv)

2002 2001-2003
CalPortland Cement Units 1-4

Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions Relative to Base Used in Visibility Modeling 

All Units

Technology 

Used

-Emissions 

(TPY, annual)

Technology 

Used

-Emissions 

(TPY, annual)

-Emissions 

(TPY, annual)

$/year if 

using MAT

$/year if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 0 0 $ - $ -

LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1 LNB or MAT 561 0 561 $ 497,565 $ 1,317,024

SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2 SNCR 936 0 936 $ 725,007 $ 725,007

LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3 0 LNB or MAT 568 568 $ 234,701 $ 535,613

SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4 0 SNCR 947 947 $ 604,583 $ 604,583

Table 3a. NOx Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Units 1-3* (from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3a) Table 3b. NOx Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Unit 4 (from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3b) 

MAT LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR MAT or LNC LNB SNCR LNB and SNCR

capital $676,001 $2,708,493 $383,535 $3,092,028 capital $1,188,275 $3,427,320 $1,336,373 $4,763,693

Annualized Capital $63,810 $255,663 $36,203 $291,866 Annualized Capital $112,165 $323,515 $126,144 $449,659

FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes)$102,045 $183,345 $90,347 $198,686 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $122,536 $212,098 $128,460 $265,553

Reagent $115,120 $80,584 Reagent $349,978 $244,985

Total Cost, $/year $165,855 $439,008 $241,669 $571,136 Total Cost, $/year $234,701 $535,613 $604,583 $960,197

Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51%

tons reduced 187 187 312 318 tons reduced 568 568 947 966

$/ton reduced $887 $2,349 $776 $1,798 $/ton reduced $413 $943 $638 $994

Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $608 $3,098 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $976 $1,824

Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) ($1,584) $1,010 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $182 $1,067

lb/hr emission rate 111 111 79 77 lb/hr emission rate 336 336 240 235

* Values shown are per unit 

CalPortland Cement Units 1-4

visibility method 8, 20% best background

Using dv from area with highest impact (12 CIAs)

if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $0.0 $0.0 1.3

LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1 561 $0.5 $1.3 $887 $2,348 1.1 0.15 $3.4 $9.1 0

SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2 936 $0.7 $0.7 $775 $775 1.0 0.22 $3.3 $3.3 0

LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3 568 $0.2 $0.5 $413 $943 1.1 0.17 $1.4 $3.2 0

SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4 947 $0.6 $0.6 $638 $638 4.0 0.26 $2.3 $2.3 0

(same tons & costs as above) Using dv sum over all areas (12 areas)

if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB if using MAT if using LNB

Base Case Base 0 $0.0 $0.0 5.0

LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1 561 $0.5 $1.3 $887 $2,348 4.4 0.54 $0.9 $2.4

SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2 936 $0.7 $0.7 $775 $775 4.1 0.89 $0.8 $0.8

LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3 568 $0.2 $0.5 $413 $943 4.3 0.62 $0.4 $0.9

SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4 947 $0.6 $0.6 $638 $638 0.1 1.01 $0.6 $0.6

visibility 

benefit, dv

$/dv (millions)

Control 

Option

Units 1-3

$/ton reduction $/dv (millions) visibility 

impact, dv 

visibility 

benefit, dv

Controls Control 

Option

ton/yr 

reduction

cost, $/yr (millions) $/ton reduction visibility 

impact, dv 

Controls Control 

Option

ton/yr 

reduction

cost, $/yr (millions) # CIAs w/ 

improvement 

≥ 0.5 dv

Unit 4

Controls

All Units
CalPortland Cement Units 1-4

visibility method 8, 20% best background

Table 1(b). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options

Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4

Base Case

LNB or 

MAT u.1-3

SNCR u. 

1-3

LNB or 

MAT u.4 SNCR u.4 Base Case

LNB or MAT 

u.1-3 SNCR u. 1-3

LNB or MAT 

u.4 SNCR u.4

chir Chiricahua NM 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05

chrw Chiricahua 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.05

gali Galiuro 1.02 0.91 0.84 0.90 0.83 0.00 0.11 0.18 0.13 0.19

gila Gila 1.23 1.11 1.02 1.07 0.97 0.00 0.12 0.21 0.17 0.26

maza Mazatzal 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03

moba Mount Baldy 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03

pefo Petrified Forest 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03

pimo Pine Mountain 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02

sagu Saguaro 1.26 1.12 1.04 1.12 1.02 0.00 0.15 0.22 0.14 0.24

sian Sierra Ancha 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03

supe Superstition 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.27 0.24 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.06

syca Sycamore Canyon 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02

Total 4.97 4.43 4.08 4.35 3.96 0.54 0.89 0.62 1.01

Max 1.26 1.12 1.04 1.12 1.02 0.15 0.22 0.17 0.26

# CIAs w/ -dv ≥ 0.5 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0

Table 5(b). Control Opon Cost Effecveness (million $/dv)†

Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-4

CIA MAT u.1-3 LNB u.1-3

SNCR u. 

1-3 MAT u.4 LNB u.4 SNCR u.4

chir Chiricahua NM 19.1 50.7 16.1 7.8 17.9 12.1

chrw Chiricahua 19.1 50.7 16.5 7.3 16.7 11.2

gali Galiuro 4.7 12.3 4.0 1.9 4.3 3.1

gila Gila 4.1 10.8 3.4 1.4 3.2 2.3

maza Mazatzal 45.2 119.7 38.2 16.8 38.3 21.6

moba Mount Baldy 31.1 82.3 29.0 14.7 33.5 22.4

pefo Petrified Forest 35.5 94.1 31.5 15.6 35.7 24.2

pimo Pine Mountain 45.2 119.7 40.3 18.1 41.2 26.3

sagu Saguaro 3.4 9.1 3.3 1.6 3.7 2.5

sian Sierra Ancha 38.3 101.3 34.5 13.0 29.8 21.6

supe Superstition 13.4 35.6 12.3 7.8 17.9 10.4

syca Sycamore Canyon 49.8 131.7 42.6 16.8 38.3 26.3

$/dv_sum 0.9 2.4 0.8 0.4 0.9 0.6 ($/yr) / (sum of dv benefits over all areas)

$/dv_max 3.4 9.1 3.3 1.4 3.2 2.3 ($/yr) / (max dv benefit of any area)

Class I Area

†$/dv = $ per year from Table 2 divided by visibility improvement from Table 1(b) for each control option, in millions

# CIAs with visibility improvement ≥ 0.5 dv

CIA Class I Area

98 Change relative to Base (dv) th Percentile -dv

Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-3
Table 4(b). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) at Each Class I Area (CIA) Within CalPortland Cement P

CIA

 Change relative to base (dv)

Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2

chir 0.231 0.198 0.177 0.203 0.186 0.033 0.054

chrw 0.229 0.196 0.175 0.202 0.186 0.033 0.054

gali 0.968 0.852 0.761 0.857 0.783 0.116 0.207

gila 1.144 1.008 0.916 1.014 0.926 0.136 0.228

maza 0.145 0.122 0.106 0.128 0.116 0.023 0.039

moba 0.113 0.098 0.088 0.101 0.093 0.015 0.025

pefo 0.119 0.103 0.092 0.102 0.091 0.016 0.027

pimo 0.118 0.101 0.089 0.104 0.094 0.017 0.029

sagu 1.253 1.119 1.022 1.080 0.962 0.134 0.231

sian 0.137 0.122 0.109 0.123 0.115 0.015 0.028

supe 0.319 0.274 0.255 0.282 0.259 0.045 0.064

syca 0.104 0.089 0.079 0.090 0.081 0.015 0.025

Changes made by EPA to this UNC spreadsheet

sjb, 2012-10-08: To correctly reflect modeled controls, Ctrl2-1 and Ctrl2-2 were exchanged with Ctrl2-3 

The columns now reflect EPA original names c21, c22, c23, c24, and POSTUTIL output ctrl3, ctrl4, ctrl1, 

These changes are *NOT* reflected in the UNC Task 9 report tables for impacts, benefits, $/dv, etc. (its 

sjb, 2013-12-23: Added table (at right) for 98th percentile as average of 2001, 2002, and 2003 values.

sjb, 2014-01-14: Note that chir, chrw, gali, and gila results are all incorrect: chir used chrw's receptors

98th Percentile -dv 

2001
) Within CalPortland Cement Plant's Zone of Influence (300 km) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Option

lative to base (dv) 98th Percentile -dv 

Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1

0.028 0.045 0.233 0.205 0.186 0.201 0.181 0.028

0.027 0.043 0.326 0.290 0.261 0.282 0.252 0.036

0.111 0.185 1.145 1.053 0.993 1.017 0.934 0.092

0.130 0.218 1.379 1.270 1.198 1.211 1.100 0.109

0.017 0.029 0.151 0.135 0.125 0.131 0.120 0.016

0.012 0.020 0.110 0.097 0.089 0.093 0.082 0.013

0.017 0.028 0.101 0.089 0.081 0.088 0.080 0.012

0.014 0.024 0.131 0.116 0.107 0.110 0.095 0.015

0.173 0.291 1.335 1.198 1.105 1.187 1.110 0.137

0.014 0.022 0.139 0.127 0.117 0.114 0.102 0.012

0.037 0.060 0.290 0.263 0.245 0.255 0.232 0.027

0.014 0.023 0.101 0.088 0.078 0.083 0.073 0.013

rl2-2 were exchanged with Ctrl2-3 and Ctrl2-4, respectively.

OSTUTIL output ctrl3, ctrl4, ctrl1, and ctrl2, respectively.

or impacts, benefits, $/dv, etc. (its tables 31 - 34)

of 2001, 2002, and 2003 values.

orrect: chir used chrw's receptors, chrw used chir+chrw, gali used chir+chrw+gali, gila used chir+chrw+gali+gila

 Change relative to base 

2002
se Emissions and Control Options (listed in Table 2)

Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4

0.047 0.032 0.052 0.234 0.208 0.191 0.205 0.185

0.065 0.044 0.074 0.246 0.218 0.200 0.207 0.187

0.152 0.128 0.211 0.917 0.808 0.735 0.798 0.718

0.181 0.168 0.279 1.086 0.958 0.872 0.946 0.852

0.026 0.020 0.031 0.096 0.086 0.078 0.083 0.075

0.021 0.017 0.028 0.081 0.071 0.066 0.068 0.060

0.020 0.013 0.021 0.094 0.083 0.077 0.079 0.069

0.024 0.021 0.036 0.058 0.052 0.048 0.050 0.045

0.230 0.148 0.225 1.022 0.915 0.843 0.941 0.887

0.022 0.025 0.037 0.114 0.101 0.093 0.100 0.088

0.045 0.035 0.058 0.249 0.221 0.203 0.235 0.212

0.023 0.018 0.028 0.063 0.055 0.050 0.054 0.048

ir+chrw+gali+gila

 Change relative to base (dv) 98th Percentile -dv 

2003
Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3

0.026 0.043 0.029 0.049 0.231 0.205 0.186 0.201

0.028 0.046 0.039 0.059 0.246 0.220 0.202 0.214

0.109 0.182 0.119 0.199 1.020 0.913 0.837 0.895

0.128 0.214 0.140 0.234 1.234 1.112 1.021 1.066

0.010 0.018 0.013 0.021 0.125 0.114 0.106 0.111

0.010 0.015 0.013 0.021 0.108 0.092 0.083 0.092

0.011 0.017 0.015 0.025 0.105 0.091 0.082 0.090

0.006 0.010 0.008 0.013 0.110 0.099 0.092 0.097

0.107 0.179 0.081 0.135 1.262 1.117 1.044 1.119

0.013 0.021 0.014 0.026 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11

0.028 0.046 0.014 0.037 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.27

0.008 0.013 0.009 0.015 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08

2001-2003, using average of 2001, 2002, and 2003 values

area Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3

chir 0.233 0.204 0.185 0.203

chrw 0.267 0.235 0.212 0.230

gali 1.010 0.904 0.830 0.891

gila 1.203 1.079 0.995 1.057

maza 0.131 0.114 0.103 0.114

moba 0.101 0.089 0.081 0.087

pefo 0.105 0.092 0.083 0.090

pimo 0.102 0.090 0.081 0.088

sagu 1.203 1.077 0.990 1.069

sian 0.130 0.117 0.106 0.112

supe 0.286 0.253 0.234 0.257

syca 0.089 0.077 0.069 0.076

 Change relative to base (dv)

98th Percentile -dv 

98th Percentile -dv 
Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4

0.181 0.026 0.045 0.030 0.050

0.192 0.026 0.044 0.032 0.054

0.826 0.107 0.183 0.125 0.194

0.974 0.122 0.213 0.168 0.260

0.097 0.011 0.019 0.014 0.028

0.081 0.016 0.025 0.016 0.027

0.080 0.014 0.023 0.015 0.025

0.087 0.011 0.018 0.013 0.023

1.022 0.145 0.218 0.143 0.240

0.10 0.013 0.021 0.018 0.028

0.24 0.037 0.059 0.030 0.058

0.07 0.010 0.017 0.014 0.023

 2002, and 2003 values

Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4

0.184 0.029 0.048 0.030 0.049

0.208 0.032 0.055 0.037 0.059

0.812 0.106 0.180 0.119 0.198

0.959 0.124 0.208 0.146 0.244

0.104 0.016 0.028 0.017 0.027

0.078 0.013 0.020 0.014 0.023

0.080 0.013 0.021 0.015 0.025

0.078 0.013 0.021 0.014 0.024

0.986 0.126 0.213 0.134 0.217

0.102 0.013 0.024 0.018 0.028

0.234 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.052

0.067 0.012 0.020 0.014 0.022

LNB u123 SNCR u123 LNB u4 SNCR u4

 Change relative to base (dv)

2001-2003

 Change relative to base (dv)
lookup tables includes areas for: TEP Sundt, Catalyst Paper/Snowflake, Chemical Lime Nelson, AEPCO Apache, APS Cholla, SRP Coronado

CalPortland Cement Control scenarios Class I areas

scenarios units 1-3 unit 4 short abbr Class I area Class I area, medium Class I area, long state

Base None None Base Case band Bandelier Bandelier NM Bandelier NM NM

Ctrl2-1 LNB or MAT None LNB or MAT u.1-3 brca Bryce Canyon Bryce Canyon NP Bryce Canyon NP UT

Ctrl2-2 SNCR None SNCR u. 1-3 care Capitol Reef Capitol Reef NP Capitol Reef NP UT

Ctrl2-3 None LNB or MAT LNB or MAT u.4 chir Chiricahua NM Chiricahua NM Chiricahua NM AZ

Ctrl2-4 None SNCR SNCR u.4 chrw Chiricahua Chiricahua Wild. Chiricahua Wilderness AZ

gali Galiuro Galiuro Wild. Galiuro Wilderness AZ

gila Gila Gila Wild. Gila Wilderness NM

grca Grand Canyon Grand Canyon NP Grand Canyon NP AZ

jotr Joshua Tree Joshua Tree NP Joshua Tree NP CA

maza Mazatzal Mazatzal Wild. Mazatzal Wilderness AZ

meve Mesa Verde Mesa Verde NP Mesa Verde NP CO

moba Mount Baldy Mount Baldy Wild. Mount Baldy Wilderness AZ

pefo Petrified Forest Petrified Forest NP Petrified Forest NP AZ

pimo Pine Mountain Pine Mountain Wild. Pine Mountain Wilderness AZ

sagu Saguaro Saguaro NP Saguaro NP AZ

sape San Pedro Parks San Pedro Parks Wild. San Pedro Parks Wilderness NM

sian Sierra Ancha Sierra Ancha Wild. Sierra Ancha Wilderness AZ

supe Superstition Superstition Wild. Superstition Wilderness AZ

syca Sycamore Canyon Sycamore Canyon Wild. Sycamore Canyon Wilderness AZ

zion Zion Zion NP Zion NP UT