alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the six month period ending June 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000748524
<NAME>         TWELVE AMH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>   1
<CURRENCY>     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                       212,679
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               219,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                               (88,484,244)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 219,904
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             352,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,975,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (6,429,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (6,429,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (6,429,207)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (10,608.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (10,608.19)
        


</TABLE>
Janet W. STEVENS, DOC #H47888, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-831

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kristen TURNER, Appellant, v. POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-952

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
B.H., the Mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Guardian Ad Litem, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3516

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 25, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 8 (Thursday, January 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 1338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XF942


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Groundfish Committee to consider 
actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone 
(EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be brought to the full 
Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate.

DATES: This meeting will be held on Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 9 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the DoubleTree by Hilton, 50 
Ferncroft Road, Danvers, MA 01950; phone: (978) 777-2500.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

    The committee will provide recommendations to the Council on FY2018 
recreational measures for Gulf of Maine cod and haddock, and possibly 
Georges Bank cod. The committee will also consider providing a 
recommendation to the Council for a new control date for the party/
charter fishery. They will also receive an overview of the Council's 
priorities for 2018. The committee plans discuss the progress on 
Amendment 23/Groundfish Monitoring. Other business will be discussed as 
necessary.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during these meetings. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date. This meeting will be 
recorded. Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the recording is 
available upon request.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 8, 2018.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-00379 Filed 1-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Order filed February 4, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00469-CV

____________

AZHAR M. CHAUDHARY, Appellant

V.

WENSHAN ZHANG, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-CCV-064611

ORDER

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 31, 2019. Appellant filed a 

notice of appeal on June 12, 2019. Appellant filed a Statement of Inability to 

Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial court. “A party who files a Statement of 

Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay costs except 

by order of the court as provided by this rule.” See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(a). 

The clerks’ record filed January 2, 2020 reflects that appellant has not been 

ordered to pay costs pursuant to Rule 145. Accordingly, the official court reporter 

for the 234th District Court is directed to file the reporter’s record within 30 days

of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
Christopher SANTIAGO, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D17-2044

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

Christopher Santiago, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On March 4, 2015, after petitioner Christopher Santiago's probation was revoked, the trial court sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. Santiago filed a petition with this court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), seeking a belated appeal of this sentence.

In his petition, Santiago contends that he requested his trial counsel to file an *344appeal of the sentence, and that, despite agreeing to the request, trial counsel failed to do so. We ordered the state to respond to the petition, and in its response, the state wrote that it spoke with trial counsel, who gave his version of the post-sentence conversation with Santiago. When an appeal of the probation sentence came up, trial counsel said, Santiago was told that he could appeal but trial counsel (who was privately retained) would not handle it and Santiago would have to find another attorney.

The state's response raises a good faith basis to dispute Santiago's assertion that he requested his trial counsel to file an appeal on his behalf, and his trial counsel agreed to do it. *See**Brownlee v. State*, 223 So.3d 1064, 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (finding the state "had raised a good faith basis to dispute" the defendant's belated appeal petition where the state's response "informed this Court that it contacted Brownlee's defense counsel who recalled that he advised Brownlee about his appellate rights in light of his plea bargain"); *Parrish v. State*, 201 So.3d 145, 145-46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (finding the state "raised a good faith basis to dispute" the defendant's belated appeal petition where the state "appended an e-mail to its Response ... in which trial counsel disputes Parrish's assertion that counsel was requested to file a notice of appeal"). We, therefore, appoint the judge presiding in criminal division ten of the Miami-Dade circuit court as a commissioner to hold an evidentiary hearing and determine the limited, disputed issues of fact upon which Santiago's petition turns: whether Santiago instructed his trial counsel to file a notice of appeal and trial counsel agreed to file one. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.140 cmt. n. (1996 amend.) ("In the rare case where entitlement to belated appeal depends on a determination of disputed facts, the appellate courts may appoint a commissioner to make a report and recommendation."). In order to allow the division judge the opportunity to conduct an evidentiary hearing, make the required determination, and transmit the report of such determination to this court, the proceedings on Santiago's petition shall be held in abeyance for sixty days from the date of this order.

Commissioner appointed; petition held in abeyance.
EX PARTE Anthony WOOLEY

CR-15-1405

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Chilton Cir. Ct.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel NIAID Peer Review Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         February 9, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Paul A. Amstad, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 240-669-5067,                         *pamstad@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 9, 2018.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-00441 Filed 1-11-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Restaurant Properties II (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. Date:
    
    May 13, 2005
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. MoriartyDirector, Chairman andChief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    May 13, 2005
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. TerranoExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer
Alanzo Lamart EDISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2161

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
H. Res. 931 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 13, 2023. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY: 

Mr. Amo (to rank immediately after Ms. McClellan). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Under
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Daleco Resources Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, I, Gary J.
Novinskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:  May
      19,
    2009
            
            
            /s/ Gary J.
      NovinskieGary
      J. NovinskieChief
      Financial Officer
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Vantage Drilling International (the “*Company*”) for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “*Report*”), I, Thomas J. Cimino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes**-**Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

April 30, 2019 

 

/s/ THOMAS J. CIMINO

Thomas J. Cimino

*Chief FinancialOfficer*
**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

DENNIS P. KISSANE, RITA MARTIN, 

SUZANNE DEVORE, ANDREA TIGLIO, 

ANDREW TIGLIO, HOWARD I. ROE, 

DAVID C. SCARES, PAT BAUER, TRACY 

PALMIERI, SHAWN CORRELLO, JOYCE 

WAHLAH, ANGELA BIDLACK, BARBARA 

B. GORDON, ROBERT B. GORDON, 

LANCE CROW, DAVID EISENREICH, 

AND KENNETH SPEAR, 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF 

MCCANDLESS, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS 

TRUST, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 178 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6936

XAVIER MILTON EARQUHART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES MARSHALS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH 

CAROLINA; PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00620-LO-IDD)

Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Xavier Milton Earquhart, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Xavier Milton Earquhart, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his 

convictions by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to § 2255(e), a 

prisoner may challenge his convictions in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 

§ 2241 if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his 

detention. 

[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a 

conviction when: (1) at the time of conviction, settled law of this circuit or 

the Supreme Court established the legality of the conviction; (2) subsequent 

to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the substantive law 

changed such that the conduct of which the prisoner was convicted is deemed 

not to be criminal; and (3) the prisoner cannot satisfy the gatekeeping 

provisions of § 2255 because the new rule is not one of constitutional law.

In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Earquhart v. United States Marshals for the E.

Dist. of N.C., No. 1:20-cv-00620-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. June 11, 2020). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Corey Adam RAIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1430

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
James LEVELL, III, Appellant, v. William D. SNYDER, Sheriff of Martin County, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2736

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 14, 2018]

James Levell, III, Stuart, pro se.

Brittany Brooks of Martin County Sheriff's Office, Stuart, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed without prejudice to Appellant filing a timely Rule 1.540 Motion for Relief from Judgment.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6741

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

STEVEN GREGORY RICHARDSON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:05-cr-00298-F-1) 

Submitted: September 4, 2009 Decided: October 1, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Steven Gregory Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret 

Hayes, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Steven Gregory Richardson appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of 

sentence. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal on the 

ground that Richardson’s notice of appeal was untimely filed. 

Although the document Richardson captioned as a “motion of 

Appeal” was untimely, he earlier filed a “request for 

certificate of appealability” within the ten-day appeal period. 

Because we construe Richardson’s “request” to be a timely notice 

of appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 3, we deny the Government’s 

motion to dismiss. Nevertheless, we have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Richardson, No. 5:05-cr-00298-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1993
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              200
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        49,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (50,149)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      (200)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (125)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.00)
        

</TABLE>