alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Susan B. SNYDER, Former Wife, Appellant, v. Jess H. SNYDER, Former Husband, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5554

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
A.G., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-823

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael A. GOSHAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 28, 2018

Michael A. Goshay, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

In light of this Court's denial of Petitioner's previous petition for belated appeal in *Goshay v. State* , 156 So.3d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), the petition for belated appeal filed October 30, 2017, is dismissed as successive. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(C).

Wetherell, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 15, 2011 | /s/ Michael J. Dolan    |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                             | Michael J. Dolan        |   |
|                             | Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        By virtue of the authority vested in the President by Section 2(a) of Pub. B. 87-603 (76 Stat. 593; 42 U.S.C. 2652), and delegated to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget by the President through Executive Order No. 11541 of July 1, 1970, the rates referenced below are hereby established. These rates are for use in connection with the recovery from tortiously liable third persons for the cost of inpatient medical services furnished by military treatment facilities through the Department of Defense (DoD). The rates have been established in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-25, requiring reimbursement of the full cost of all services provided. The inpatient medical service rates referenced are effective upon publication of this notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         and will remain in effect until further notice. The outpatient medical, dental, and cosmetic surgery rates published on November 25, 2008 remain in effect until further notice. Pharmacy rates are updated periodically. A full disclosure of the rates is posted at the DoD's Uniform Business Office Web Site:                         *http://www.tricare.mil/​ocfo/​_docs/​FY09%20Direct%20Care%20Inpatient%20Billing%20Rates%20Memo.pdf*.                     

Jim Nussle, 

Director.

[FR Doc. E9-718 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
LAW OFFICES 

GAROFALO GOERLICH HAINBACH PC 

1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE NW SUITE 590 

WASHINGTON DC 20036-6802 

 

AARON A. GOERLICH TELEPHONE 202 776-3970

DIRECT DIAL 202 776-3974 FACSIMILE 202 776-3975

AGOERLICH@GGH-AIRLAW.COM WWW.GGH-AIRLAW.COM

February 24, 2015

Lauralyn Remo, Chief

Air Carrier Fitness Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Joint Application of Southern Air Inc. and Florida West International

Airways, Inc. for Pendente Lite Exemption

Docket DOT-OST-2015-0034

Dear Ms. Remo:

We have completed polling of the air carrier representatives served with the referenced 

application filed February 19, 2015. There were no objections to the application. 

Sincerely,

Aaron A. Goerlich

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

Counsel for Southern Air Inc.

cc: Docket DOT-OST-2015-0034

Damon Walker, DOT

Marshall S. Sinick, Counsel for FWIA
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 6, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51226

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS ANDRES GARCIA-VALERIO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:06-CR-88-ALL

--------------------

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Andres

Garcia-Valerio raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
#### James E. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy A. CASTRO, Warden; et al., Defendants, and Imam Mohamed, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-15732.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 20, 2004.

James E. Smith, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

Allen Robert Crown, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, Constance Picciano, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants.

Tami M. Warwick, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner James E. Smith appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Wyatt v. Terhune,*315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because defendant presented evidence demonstrating that Smith failed to complete the grievance process through the final level of review. *See*42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); *Wyatt,*315 F.3d at 1119.

To the extent that Smith argues that his Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated, we decline to consider these contentions because they were raised for the first time on appeal. *See Jiminez v. Rice,*276 F.3d 478, 481 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7174

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. HERMAN BILLUPS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers , District Judge. ( 3:00

- cr
- 00059

- 1 )

Submitted : January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Herman Lewis Billups, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Vir ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Herman Lewis Billups appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

cou rt. United States v. Billups , No. 3:00

- cr
- 00059

- 1 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
proc ess.
AFFIRMED
Scott ROHLEDER, a Florida resident, Appellant, v. James P. WIBERG, a Florida resident; and Charles Posternack, a Florida resident, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-364

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Date: November 10, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Greg A. Tunney
    *Greg A. TunneyTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  Date: November 10, 2010
    By:
    /s/ José G. Ibarra
    *José G. IbarraTitle:
    Senior Vice President  Finance and

Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 *
    
    These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. These
certifications shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that R.G. Barry
Corporation specifically incorporates these certifications by reference.
Penni L. CONROY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Regis Conroy, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4119

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Windell GUSTAMA, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3759

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1053 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the use of taxpayer funded 

union time for employees of the Internal Revenue Service, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the use 

of taxpayer funded union time for employees of the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IRS Customer Service 

5 Improvement Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1053 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON TAXPAYER FUNDED UNION OFFI2 CIAL TIME FOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERV3 ICE EMPLOYEES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7131 of title 5, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(e) The authority provided under subsection (d) 

8 shall not apply with respect to the Internal Revenue Serv9 ice, or an employee of the Internal Revenue Service, dur10 ing the periods each year— 

11 ‘‘(1) beginning on February 12 and ending on 

12 May 5; and 

13 ‘‘(2) beginning on September 1 and ending on 

14 November 1.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 7131(d) of 

16 title 5, United States Code, is amended, in the matter pre17 ceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘preceding’’ and insert18 ing ‘‘other’’. 

19 (c) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub20 sections (a) and (b) shall supersede the terms of any col21 lective bargaining agreement (including a collective bar22 gaining agreement that is in effect, as of the date of enact23 ment of this Act) that are inconsistent with those amend24 ments. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 976 

Recognizing the roles and the contributions of Americas Certified Registered 

Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their critical role in providing quality 

health care for the public and the Nations Armed Forces for more 

than 150 years, through multiple public health emergencies, and beyond. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2024 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY (for herself, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. BACON, 

Ms. SCANLON, Mr. TONKO, and Ms. BONAMICI) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the roles and the contributions of Americas Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their 

critical role in providing quality health care for the public 

and the Nations Armed Forces for more than 150 years, 

through multiple public health emergencies, and beyond. 

Whereas Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) 

are essential to America’s health care system, providing 

high-quality, cost-effective anesthesia and pain management care; 

Whereas CRNAs safely administer more than 50,000,000 anesthetics to patients each year; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 976 IH 

Whereas CRNAs are the primary providers of anesthesia care 

in rural America, enabling health care facilities in these 

medically underserved areas to offer obstetrical, surgical, 

trauma stabilization, and pain management services for 

millions of underserved and at-risk people; 

Whereas CRNAs practice in every setting in which anesthesia 

is delivered, including traditional hospital surgical suites 

and obstetrical delivery rooms, the offices of dentists, podiatrists, ophthalmologists, and plastic surgeons, ambulatory surgical centers, and United States Military and 

Public Health Services and Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities; and 

Whereas the purpose of National CRNA Week, held January 

21, 2024, through January 27, 2024, is to raise public 

awareness of and celebrate the Nation’s 61,000 Certified 

Registered Nurse Anesthetists and student registered 

nurse anesthetists: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives thanks 

2 and promotes the profession of Certified Registered Nurse 

3 Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their incredible, selfless, and 

4 dedicated service for over 150 years, by encouraging pa5 tients, hospital administrators, health care professionals, 

6 policymakers, and others to utilize CRNAs to their full 

7 potential and to recognize the work of CRNAs by partici8 pating in National CRNA Week. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee (LTFAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting on May 5, 2009 at the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 128 
Market Street, Stateline, NV 89449. This Committee, established by the 
Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is 
chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms 
of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and 
other matters raised by the Secretary.

DATES: The meetings will be held May 5, 2009, beginning at 12 p.m. and 
ending at 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Tahoe Regional Planning 
Agency, 128 Market Street, Stateline, NV 89449.
    For Further Information or to Request an Accommodation (one week 
prior to meeting date) Contact: Aria Hains, Lake Tahoe Basin Management 
Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, 
(530) 543-2773.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to be covered on the agenda: (1) 
Discuss policy associated with the Federal share environmental 
improvement program for capital projects located on private land; (2) 
review and discuss public comments and congressional input on LTFAC's 
preliminary recommendation of Lake Tahoe Southern Nevada Public Land 
Management Act (SNPLMA) Round 10 capital projects and science themes, 
and (3) develop a final LTFAC recommendation for the Lake Tahoe SNPLMA 
Round 10 capital projects and science themes.
    All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee meetings are open 
to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend at the 
above address. Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee 
during the open public comment period at the meeting or by filing 
written statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after 
the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

    Dated: March 26, 2009.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-7419 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 5-8-2008 

# U SA v . D o e P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 04-1482

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" U SA v . D oe " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1255. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/1255U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT M a y 7 , 2 0 0 8 N o. 04- 1482 & 04- 1483 UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v . J OHN DO E A p p e l l a n t ( E as t ern D i s t r i ctof

Penns yl vani a D . C . 01- cr - 00565- 2)
P res ent : SL O V I T E R , JO R D A N and A L A R C O N , C i rcui t Judges
M ot i on by A ppel l antt o Seal , R e- D ocket& R ei s s ue thi s M at t eras a “J ohn D oe” Case and a R eq u est for the P o sti n g o f an O rde r R eg ard ing the R em o v al of the M att er.

R es ponse due 5/ 5/ 08. / s/ S t eph anie W el l s C as e M anage r( 267) 299- 4947 O R D E R The f or e go i ng m o tio n is g ra n ted . T h e p re v io u sly -file d n o t p re c e d e n tial o p in io n a n d th e ju d g m e n t is re c a lled a n d w ill b e re m o v e d fro m th e C o u rt’s w e b site . T h e n o t p re c e d e n tial o p in io n a n d ju d g m e n t w ill be r ei s s ued. T hes e cons ol i dat ed appe al s ar e dee m ed s eal ed.

B y th e C o u rt, / s /D ol ores K . Sl ovi t er C i rcui t Judge D at e d: 

### May 8, 2008 smw/c c: Mar

y E. Cr awl ey, Esq. Rober t A. Zauzme r, Esq. Sondra R. Rodrigue s, Esq.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1999
<CASH>                                         177,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               327,046
<PP&E>                                         436,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                 242,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 528,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,530
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           588
<OTHER-SE>                                     471,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   528,004
<SALES>                                        101,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,147
<CGS>                                          136,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,035
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,163
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,872
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Danilo MONTOYA, a/k/a Daniel Montoya, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-7707.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 14, 2004.

Decided: May 26, 2004.

Danilo Montoya, Appellant pro se.

Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, Office of the United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Danilo Montoya previously appealed the district court’s final order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal. *See United States v. Montoya,*69 Cal.App.4th 607, 81 Cal. Rptr.2d 708 (4th Cir.2004) (unpublished). Montoya again appeals from the district court’s denial of his § 2255 motion. Because we have previously determined that Montoya has failed to provide grounds meriting a certificate of appealability, it is the law of the case. *Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp.,*486 U.S. 800, 815-16, 108 S.Ct. 2166, 100 L.Ed.2d 811 (1988); *United States v. Bell,*5 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir.1993).

Thus, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*