alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 946 

Recognizing Gold Shield Families and affirming that their sacrifices and 

difficulties should not be forgotten. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2024 

Mr. MEUSER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Gold Shield Families and affirming that their 

sacrifices and difficulties should not be forgotten. 

Whereas the United States owes an immeasurable debt of 

gratitude to the brave men and women who serve as first 

responders, courageously risking their lives to protect our 

communities; 

Whereas the families of these valiant first responders exhibit 

unparalleled strength, resilience, and sacrifice, supporting 

their loved ones in their noble service to our Nation; 

Whereas the loss of a first responder in the line of duty is 

a profound tragedy that leaves an enduring impact on 

their families, necessitating unwavering support, and recognition from the Nation they served; 

2 

•HRES 946 IH 

Whereas Gold Shield Families are defined as the families of 

fallen police officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), correction officers, emergency dispatch 

officers, and emergency service providers who have tragically lost their lives in the line of duty protecting and 

serving their communities; 

Whereas it is essential to acknowledge and honor the dedication and sacrifices made by the families of fallen first responders, whose unwavering courage and resilience serve 

as an inspiration to us all; and 

Whereas the sacrifices and difficulties faced by Gold Shield 

Families in the aftermath of the loss of a loved one in 

the line of duty should not be forgotten, as they continue 

to endure hardships and challenges while upholding the 

legacy of their fallen heroes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, by the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) that Gold Shield Families, consisting of the 

3 families of fallen police officers, firefighters, emer4 gency medical technicians (EMTs), correction offi5 cers, emergency dispatch officers, and emergency 

6 service providers, are hereby recognized and honored 

7 for their immeasurable sacrifices and steadfast sup8 port of their loved ones in service to our Nation; 

9 (2) that this recognition stands as a testament 

10 to the enduring gratitude and appreciation of the 

11 United States for the tremendous contributions and 

12 sacrifices made by Gold Shield Families; and 

3 

•HRES 946 IH 

1 (3) that a copy of this resolution be transmitted 

2 to the President of the United States and made pub3 licly available to honor and recognize Gold Shield 

4 Families for their sacrifices and unwavering support 

5 of our Nation’s first responders and emergency serv6 ice providers, affirming that their sacrifices and dif7 ficulties should not be forgotten. 

Æ
Peter MAYA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-344

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Kenneth S. TRAYWICK

1151250 (2150531)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40691 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LUIS GOMEZ

- PEREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 9

- 1

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Gomez

- Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez

- Perez h a s not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 17, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40691 Document: 00512666530 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014No. 13

- 40691

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40691 Document: 00512666530 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1181
MONA MOHAMMED ABDU, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-899-263) Submitted: September 13, 2006 Decided: October 11, 2006 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Israel Gobena, GOBENA & ASSOCIATES, St. Paul, Minnesota, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Michelle Gorden Latour, Assistant Director, Shahira M. Tadross, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mona Mohammed Abdu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Abdu’s motion. See8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2006). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We deny Abdu’s motion to remand and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a)**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, M. Sreenivasan, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Synthetech, Inc.; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.          The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.          The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

| Date: August 3, 2005 | By: /s/ M. Sreenivasan

Title: President & Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order entered June 19, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00163 - CV No. 05 - 18 - 00164 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF M .A.A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial Dis trict Court

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 1 - 09 - 843 and 01 - 15 - 76



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee Susan Z. Wright’s June 14, 2019 unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER Wright to file her

res ponsive brief no later than July 22, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Executive Order 13820

#  Termination of Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1**                        . Executive Order 13799 of May 11, 2017 (Establishment of Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity), is hereby revoked, and the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity is accordingly terminated.                    

**Sec. 2**                        .                         *General Provisions.*                         (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                    

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party (other than by the United States) against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2018-00240

Billing code 3295-F8-P
Christopher Lee HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1902

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Palmdale Hybrid Power Project (SE 09

- 01)

August 2011 What Other Air Quality

- Related Laws and Regulations Apply to this Proposed Permit?

In addition to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration regulations under the Clean Air Act, t he Palmdale Hybrid Power Project (Project) is required to comply with other environmental requirements governing its air emissions . To this end, t he City of Palmdale has also submitted applications for state and local construction approvals of the Project , respectively referred to as an Application for Certification (AFC) submitted to the California Energy Commission (CEC) and an application for a Determinatio n of Compliance (DOC) submitted to the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AQMD)

. The AQMD issued a final DOC for the Project on May 13, 2010

. The applicant must also apply for and obtain an Acid Rain permit and a t itle V operating permit

. Th e applicant will apply for the t itle V operating permit, which will incorporate the acid rain permit

, after the facility is constructed as these permits are not required prior to construction. The AQMD has jurisdiction to issue the Acid Rain permit and th e title V operating permit for the facility.

What is the Contact Information for the Other Agencies Involved in this Project?

California Energy Commission (CEC) Contact Information Refer to Project: City of Palmdale Hybrid Power Plant Project Licensing Case (08

- AFC

- 09 ) http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/palmdale/index.html

CEC CONTACT PHONE NUMBER ROLE

Ken Celli
KCelli @energy.state.ca.us (916) 651

- 8893 Hearing Officer

Felicia Miller
FMiller @energy.state.ca.us (916) 654

- 4640 Project Manager

Public Adviser publicadviser@energy.state.ca.us 1

- 800

- 822

- 6228 Public Participation

News Media mediaoffice@energy.state.ca.us (916) 654

- 4989 Media & Public Communications

Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Contact Information Refer to Project: Palmdale Hybrid Power Project

AQMD CONTACT PHONE NUMBER ROLE

Bret Banks bbanks@avaqmd.ca.gov (661) 723

- 8070 Operations Manager

Alan De Salvio
A desalvi o @mdaqmd.ca.gov (760) 245

- 1661 Supervising Air Quality Engineer

Chris Anderson canderson@avaqmd.ca.gov (661) 723

- 8070 Air Quality Engineer

*Note: This information is provided as a courtesy, based on public information . EPA has not independently verified the accuracy of all the information provided herein. STATE/LOCAL AGENCY CONTACTS

PALMDALE HYBRID POWE R PROJECT
PROPOSED CLEAN AIR A CT PSD

PERMIT
Andrew P. TOWEY and Susan Towey, Appellants, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4791

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
31.2





CELSION
CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION








I, Sean
Moran, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the quarterly report of Celsion Corporation;
and





2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.








Date:
November 18,
2009                                                                 /s/ Sean
Moran


Sean Moran


Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


Celsion
Corporation
|                 |   | State or Other Jurisdiction of |   |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Subsidiary           |   | Incorporation or Organization            |   |
|                 |   |                                               |   |
| Telesat Satellite LP |   | Delaware                                           |   |
|                 |   |                                               |   |

|                 |   | State or Other Jurisdiction of |   |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Subsidiary           |   | Incorporation or Organization            |   |
|                 |   |                                               |   |
| Telesat Interco Inc. |   | Canada                                             |   |
|                 |   |                                               |   |
| Telesat Canada       |   | Canada                                             |   |
|                 |   |                                               |   |

----
EXHIBIT  32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the
"Corporation")  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of  the  Corporation  certifies  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the  Corporation.


November 14, 2003



                                      /s/ Steven R. Norton
                                    -------------------------
                                    Steven R. Norton
                                    Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                    Officer and Secretary


<PAGE>
Raymond Witter MAYHEW v. STATE

CR-15-0866

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016 Reh. denied November 10, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### REED et al. v. HOUSTON OIL CO. OF TEXAS et al.

No. 10199.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1943.

Arthur H. Bartelt, of Austin, Tex,, for appellants.

William Hamlet Blades and Tarlton Morrow, both of Houston, Tex., and Ben F. Vaughan, Jr., of Corpus Christi, Tex., for appellees.

Before HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges, and STRUM, District Judge.

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit to cancel an oil and gas contract, for an accounting, for a reconveyance of an undivided one-half interest in the leases acquired by the Houston Oil Company, and for cancellation of certain corporate stock. Jurisdiction' of the court below was based solely upon diversity of citizenship and the requisite amount in controversy. Some of the defendants below were not served with process, and the suit was dismissed as to them. As to the other parties, a jury was waived and the cause proceeded to trial before the court. From a judgment that plaintiffs take nothing by their suit and pay the costs, this appeal was prosecuted.

It is claimed by appellants that the contract and leases were secured by fraud, part of which consisted in bribing a corporate officer. Many issues were presented and many defenses raised in the court below, but appellees’ real defense was that there was no fraud. No good could result either from restating the pleadings or reviewing the evidence in this case. The findings and conclusions of the district court are free from error, and the judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.
George CAMACHO, M.D., and Ace Medical, LLC, Petitioners, v. NORTH FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, PLLC f/k/a Florida Medical Associates, Inc., a Florida Professional Limited Liability Company, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-2024

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DISMISSED.
----

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 13, 2010 | /s/ KENDRA BERGER                                               |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Kendra Berger                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                   | NTN Buzztime, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

----
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Synthetech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Form 10-Q), I, Gary Weber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Gary A. WeberGary A. Weber
 Vice President, Finance,Chief Financial Officer February 14, 2005
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2 

Certification of CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of THL Credit, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terrence W. Olson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| /s/     TERRENCEW. OLSON           |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:   Terrence W. Olson                    |
| Title:     Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:     March 5, 2020       |