alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,256] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 17, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Pine Hosiery Mills, Incorporated, Star, North Carolina. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9-7754 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.2**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the quarterly report of Landmark Land Company, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joe V.Olree, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.   November 14, 2005 /s/ JOE V. OLREE     Joe V. Olree  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Landmark Land Company, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Touchstone Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the "Report"), I, Jason K.
Raza, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jason K. Raza
--------------------------
Jason K. Raza
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

PRIME GLOBAL CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Amendment to Annual Report of Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
year ended October 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Weng Kung Wong, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                            
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ Weng Kung Wong
        Weng Kung Wong                  
|Date: March 31, 2020 |  | Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BANDELE M. JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,

Chief District Judge. (CR-95-51, CA-02-1)

Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bandele M. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bandele M. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying

relief in his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.

See United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-95-51; CA-02-1 (S.D.W. Va.

Feb. 6, 2002). Additionally, we deny Jones’ motions to proceed in

forma pauperis, to amend the record, and for oral argument, which

we dispense with because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Westbridge Research Group (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Christine Koenemann, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.







Date:
      July 13, 2010
            By:
      /s/ Christine
      Koenemann
              Christine
      Koenemann
              Principal
      Executive Officer
              Principal
      Financial Officer
|   | (1)                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Winland. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         | Winland      Electronics, Inc. |                                       |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                         |                           |                                       |   |
| Date:       May 2, 2008 | By:                            | /s/ Thomas      J. de Petra           |   |
|                         |                           | Thomas      J. de Petra                    |   |
|                         |                           | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                         |                           |                                       |   |
Mitchell JACKSON, DC# 900880, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3662

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 8 (Thursday, January 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1449-1450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15416 and #15417; CONNECTICUT Disaster Number 
CT-00041]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of 
Connecticut

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the state of Connecticut dated 01/02/2018.
    Incident: Stonewood Condominiums Fire.
    Incident Period: 12/11/2017.

DATES: Issued on 01/02/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/05/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/02/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

[[Page 1450]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.E. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be 
adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Fairfield
Contiguous Counties:
    Connecticut: Litchfield, New Haven
    New York: Dutchess, Putnam, Westchester

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      3.500
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.750
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.770
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      3.385
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      3.385
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15416 5 
and for economic injury is 15417 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Connecticut, 
New York.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

    Dated: January 2, 2018.
Linda E. McMahon,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-00382 Filed 1-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0816 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-CE-022-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: G. Keith Noles Date

Branch Manager Date
**U**

**. S** 

**. Department**  **o f**  **Transportation**

**Docket M**  **anagement System**  **1 200**  **New Jersey**  **Ave., S**  **E W**  **a shington,**  **DC 20590** 

**Au g**  **. 0**  **3 ,**  **2015**

**Re: A**  **mendment to**  **Exem ption**  **11594 issued**  **pursuant to**  **Section 333**  **of the**  **FAA Refonn**  **Act and**  **Part 11**  **of the**  **Federal Aviation**  **Regulations in**  **Regulatory Docket**  **No. F AA-2015-0480.** 

**Dear Sir**  **or Madam;** 
**P ictorvision**  **Inc. was**  **issued an**  **Exemp t**  **ion numbe**  **r ed**  **11 5**  **94 (hereinafter**  **the Exemption)**  **for the**  **purpose of**  **conducting scri**  **p t**  **ed. closed-set filming**  **for th**  **e m**  **ot ion**  **picture and**  **television indust**  **ry. RD**  **X Aeri**  **al Media, LLC. herby**  **requests an**  **am en**  **dment to**  **the Exemption**  **to allow**  **2 a**  **d d**  **iti o** **nal models of**  **un manned aircraft**  **system (UAS) that**  **fully complies**  **with the**  **condit ions**  **of the**  **E xemption,**  **and to**  **also allow**  **the use**  **of all**  **their UAS**  **systems for**  **A er**  **ial Da**  **ta Collection.** 
**R D** **X Aerial**  **Me d**  **ia, LLC. wishes**  **to operate**  **three additional**  **va riations**  **of the**  **sUAS (models**  **number** 

### DJI **Inspire 1**  **, and**  **DJ I**  **Phantom** 

### 3) **under the**  **same te**  **nns and**  **conditions contained**  **in the**  **Exem ption.**  **At t**  **ach ed**  **her e**  **to, and**  **s u**  **bm itted**  **as a c**  **onfid en**  **ti al**  **document, is**  **the Flight**  **O per**  **atio n**  **s and**  **Procedure s**  **Manual (FOPM) fo**  **r the**  **additional UAS.**  **All operations**  **of the**  **additional UAS**  

### will **be in**  **full c**  **o m**  **plian c**  **e w**  **i th**  **the terms**  **of the Exempti**  **o n.**  **A s**  **t hi**  **s is**  **an am**  **en d**  **m e**  **n t**  **to an**  **existing exemption**  **asking fo**  **r the**  **ad di**  **t ion**  **of** 

## 2 **sim ilar**  **mode l**  **s of**  **un manned**  **aerial vehicle and**  **to a**  **llow Aerial Dat**  **a Coll**  **e ction**  **a n**  **d Closed set operations, RD X** **Aerial r** **espectfully submits**  **that g**  **o o**  **d ca**  **use exists s**  **o that**  **no t**  **ice does**  **no t**  **n eed**  **to be**  **published in**  **t he**  **Federal Register**  **for th**  **e req**  **uested amendme**  **nt**
**. P**  **l ease**  **c ontact**  **t he**  **undersigned sho**  **uld y**  **ou have**  **any q**  **uest ion**  **concerning t**  **his request**  **for an**  **am e**  **nd men**  **t to**  **t he**  **E x**  **e m**  **p t**  **ion**

**. S**  **incerely yours,**

**Patrick Morehead Co-Owner**  **RD X**  **Aerial Media, LLC.**

**. 42**  **4-258-4014**

**10920 P**  **alms Blvd** 

**. U**  **nit 20 7**  **, Lo**  **s A**  **n g**  **eles, Ca lifornia**  **9003 4**  **P: 4**  **2 4-**  **258 -40**  **15 www.**  **RDXAer i**  **al .com**
EX PARTE Lorenzo PEARSON and Clarissa A. Pearson

1151236 (2150285)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 10, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
**Exhibit24.1**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESEPRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors of Comstock HomebuildingCompanies, Inc. (the “Company”), which is about to file with the Securities andExchange Commission, (i) its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2004, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and (ii) a Registration Statement on Form S-8, under theprovisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, hereby constitutes andappoints Bruce Labovitz or Jubal Thompson his true and lawful attorneys-in-factand agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him and inhis name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign each of theAnnual Report on Form 10-K, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 and any andall amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same and any andall exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and otherdocuments in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agent, and substitute or substitutes,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to allintents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying andconfirming all things that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them orhis or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do and seek to be done byvirtue hereof.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each ofthe undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed as of the dateindicated next to his signature.

 

 
| Date:  | March 30, 2005 | /s/ Clayton Perfall   |
|--------|----------------|-----------------------|
|   |           | A. Clayton Perfall    |
|   |           |                  |
|   |           |                  |
|   |           |                  |
| Date:  | March 30, 2005 | /s/ David Guernsey    |
|   |           | David Guernsey        |
|   |           |                  |
|   |           |                  |
|   |           |                  |
| Date:  | March 30, 2005 | /s/ James MacCutcheon |
|   |           | James MacCutcheon     |
|   |           |                  |
|   |           |                  |
|   |           |                  |
| Date:  | March 30, 2005 | /s/ Gary Martin       |
|   |           | Gary Martin           |

 

 

----
The STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, etc., Appellant, v. Farouto AUGUSTIN, Appellee.

No. 3D16-622

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 3, 2018

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Carrie R. McNair, Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellant.

Farouto Augustin, in proper person.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

The Florida Department of Revenue appeals a trial court order granting Farouto Augustin's petition to disestablish paternity and terminate child support obligation as to the minor child. Because the trial court failed to make the requisite findings under section 742.18(2), Florida Statutes (2015), we reverse.

In 2013, the trial court determined Augustin's paternity to the child, Farouto Augustin, Jr., (born 11/15/2006) as a matter of law under section 742.10, Florida Statutes. In August 2015, Augustin filed a petition to disestablish paternity under section 742.18. The petition alleged that a 2009 DNA test was newly discovered evidence relating to the paternity of the child. It further alleged that "there is a 99.1% probability of paternity, indicating that the petitioner cannot be the father of the child for whom support is required." A copy of the results were not attached to the petition and the trial court never received the results in evidence.

Following a hearing, the trial court granted Augustin's petition to disestablish paternity. In its written order the trial court found that Augustin "testified that he had been aware that [the child] ... was not his child since 2009. [Augustin] testified that the Obligee agrees that he is not the father. [Augustin] testified that [the child] lives with his real mother and father." This appeal followed.

Section 742.18, Florida Statutes"establishes circumstances under which a male may disestablish paternity or terminate a child support obligation" when he receives "newly discovered evidence" demonstrating that he is not the biological father of the child. § 742.18(1). To grant relief under section 742.18(2), a trial court must find that seven factors enumerated in the statute are met. § 742.18(2)(a)-(g). Among *1125these factors, a trial court must determine that "newly discovered evidence relating to the paternity of the child has come to the petitioner's knowledge since the initial paternity determination," and that a scientific test to show a probability of paternity "was properly conducted." § 742.18(2)(a)-(b).

Here the trial court failed to make the requisite findings on these points and the record indicates these factors were not established. Thus, Augustin did not meet his statutory burden of proving the factors set forth in section 742.18(2)(a)-(g). Accordingly, we reverse.