15444 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 64 / Monday, April 6, 2009 / Notices 

company listed above will be that 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, or the original LTFV 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 16.51 

percent, the all-others rate made 

effective by the LTFV investigation. See 

OJ Order, 71 FR at 12184. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

This administrative review and notice 

are published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.221. 

Dated: March 31, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–7691 Filed 4–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Application(s) for Duty–Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 

invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before April 27, 

2009. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m.at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 3720. 

Docket Number: 09–007. Applicant: 

University of Utah, Consortium for 

Astro–Particle Research, 215 South 

State Street, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, 

UT 84111. Instrument: Electron Light 

Source (ELS) accelerator. Manufacturer: 

University of Tokyo, Japan. Intended 

Use: The instrument will be used as a 

component of a large ground Telescope 

Array, which will allow the scientists to 

calibrate the telescopes by generating a 

particle beam that accurately simulates 

a cosmic ray shower. Justification for 

Duty–Free Entry: No instruments of the 

same general category as the foreign 

instrument begin manufactured in the 

United States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: March 10, 

2009. 

Dated: March 31, 2009. 

Christopher Cassel, 

Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement 

Office. 

[FR Doc. E9–7689 Filed 4–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–849] 

Commodity Matchbooks from India: 

Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing 

Duty Determination and Alignment of 

Final Countervailing Duty 

Determination with Final Antidumping 

Duty Determination 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) preliminarily 

determines that countervailable 

subsidies are being provided to 

producers and exporters of commodity 

matchbooks from India. For information 

on the estimated subsidy rates, see the 

‘‘Suspension of Liquidation’’ section of 

this notice. This notice also serves to 

align the final countervailing duty 

(CVD) determination in this 

investigation with the final 

determination in the companion 

antidumping duty investigation of 

commodity matchbooks from India. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Carey or Douglas Kirby, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3964 and (202) 

482–3782, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Case History 

The following events have occurred 

since the publication of the 

Department’s notice of initiation in the 

Federal Register. See Commodity 

Matchbooks from India: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigation, 73 FR 

70968 (November 24, 2008) (Initiation 

Notice). 

On December 10, 2008, the 

Department selected as mandatory 

respondent, Triveni Safety Matches Pvt., 

Ltd. (Triveni), the only producer/ 

exporter of commodity matchbooks 

from India identified in the Petition 

during the period 2005 through 2008. 

The Department found no information 

indicating that there were other Indian 

producers or exporters of commodity 

matchbooks. See Memorandum to 

Barbara E. Tillman, Director, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, ‘‘Countervailing 

Duty Investigation of Commodity 

Matchbooks from India: Respondent 

Identification.’’ A public version of this 

memorandum is on file in the 

Department’s Central Records Unit 

(CRU) in Room 1117 of the main 

Department building. On December 16, 

2008, we issued the CVD questionnaire 

to the Government of India (GOI), 

requesting that the GOI forward the 

company sections of the questionnaire 

to the mandatory respondent company. 

On December 19, 2008, the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

issued its affirmative preliminary 

determination that there is a reasonable 

indication that an industry in the 

United States is materially injured by 

reason of allegedly subsidized imports 

of commodity matchbooks from India. 

See Commodity Matchbooks from India; 

Determinations, 73 FR 77840 (December 

19, 2008); and Commodity Matchbooks 

from India (Preliminary), USITC Pub. 

4054, Inv. Nos. 701–TA–459 and 731– 

TA–1155 (December 2008). 

On January 7, 2009, we postponed the 

preliminary determination of this 

investigation until March 30, 2009. See 

Commodity Matchbooks from India: 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination in the Countervailing 

Duty Investigation, 74 FR 683 (January 

7, 2009). We received a response from 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES