alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                                                                                |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                                                |   |
| Date: October 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/  Ira Levy                                                                  |   |
|                   |   | Ira Levy                                                                            |   |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer) |   |
|                   |   |                                                                                |   |
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 719 

Supporting the designation of the week beginning September 24, 2023, as 

‘‘National Source Water Protection Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS (for herself, Mr. SARBANES, Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER, 

Mr. LAWLER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. MOLINARO, Mr. COSTA, Ms. LEE of 

Nevada, Mr. SANTOS, Mr. CURTIS, Ms. TITUS, Mr. TRONE, Mr. CROW, 

Ms. TOKUDA, and Mr. NADLER) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of the week beginning September 

24, 2023, as ‘‘National Source Water Protection Week’’. 

Whereas a resilient supply of safe drinking water is critical 

to the health and success of the Nation; 

Whereas source water protection is a proactive approach to 

safeguarding, maintaining, and improving the quality and 

quantity of drinking water sources and the land that surrounds them; 

Whereas protecting drinking water sources is critical to public health, the environment, the economy, and national security; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 719 IH 

Whereas safe, reliable water is essential for food preparation, 

daily sanitation, and the everyday conveniences on which 

the people of the United States rely, and is increasingly 

vital to protect as the population continues to grow; and 

Whereas the recognition of National Source Water Protection 

Week— 

(1) celebrates stewardship of water and watersheds; 

(2) reaffirms commitment of the United States to 

protecting and sustaining drinking water supply sources 

for current and future generations; and 

(3) encourages the people of the United States to 

protect, conserve, and restore drinking water sources: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National 

3 Source Water Protection Week’’; 

4 (2) supports the protection of source water for 

5 public health and economic prosperity; 

6 (3) recognizes the central role of water in sus7 taining life and supports innovative ways to con8 serve, protect, and restore the Nation’s drinking 

9 water sources; 

10 (4) supports collaboration at the local, State, 

11 and Federal levels to achieve greater awareness, edu12 cation, and engagement to protect and enhance 

13 drinking water supplies; and 

14 (5) supports investments for more resilient and 

15 reliable drinking water sources, both ground and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 719 IH 

1 surface water, to better withstand the impacts of ex2 treme floods and droughts. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 21

RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP, INC. SUBSIDIARIES



|                                         |  |         
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------
|REG Biofuels, Inc.                       |  | Delaware
|REG Marketing & Logistics Group, LLC     |  | Iowa    
|REG Services Group, LLC                  |  | Iowa    
|REG Construction & Technology Group, LLC |  | Iowa    
|REG Ventures, LLC                        |  | Iowa    
|REG Ralston, LLC                         |  | Iowa    
|REG Houston, LLC                         |  | Texas   
|REG Danville, LLC                        |  | Delaware
|REG Newton, LLC                          |  | Iowa    
|REG Seneca, LLC                          |  | Iowa    
|REG New Orleans, LLC                     |  | Iowa    
|REG Emporia, LLC                         |  | Iowa    
|REG Clovis, LLC                          |  | Iowa    
|REG Processing Systems, LLC              |  | Iowa    
|416 S. Bell, LLC 50% owned               |  | Iowa
Almus J. FORET v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Juan A. Munoz-Gutierrez

NO. 2017-CC-2157

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
James D. FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James D. Ford, Petitioner, v. Julie L. Jones, etc., Respondent.

No. SC17-859 No. SC16-706

Supreme Court of Florida.

[January 23, 2018]

Martin J. McClain of McClain & McDermott, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Christina Z. Pacheco, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent

PER CURIAM.

*905James D. Ford appeals the circuit court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const.

Ford seeks relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Ford's appeal and consideration of his habeas petition pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Ford responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in both cases.

After reviewing Ford's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Ford is not entitled to relief. Ford's jury found him guilty of two counts of first-degree murder and recommended a sentence of death for both murders by a vote of eleven to one. *Ford v. State*, 802 So.2d 1121, 1126 (Fla. 2001). Following the jury's recommendations, the trial court sentenced Ford to death on both counts. *Id.* Ford's sentences of death became final on May 28, 2002. *Ford v. Florida*, 535 U.S. 1103, 122 S.Ct. 2308, 152 L.Ed.2d 1063 (2002). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Ford's sentences of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Ford's motion and deny his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Ford, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.
Robert John HUNT, individually and and as co-trustee of the Hunt Family Revocable Living Trust, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; Michelle Dawn Boudreau, a/k/a Michelle D. Boudreau, individually and as co-trustee of the Hunt Family Revocable Living Trust; and Rita Tison, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1674

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Jurnalul Oficial C 15I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 015I |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 6414 ianuarie 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 015I

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 6414 ianuarie 2021

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificări |
| | Rectificare la declarația comună a Parlamentului European, a Consiliului Uniunii Europene și a Comisiei Europene – Prioritățile legislative ale UE pentru 2021 ( JO C 451 I, 29.12.2020 ) | 1 |
| | Rectificare la concluziile comune ale Parlamentului European, ale Consiliului Uniunii Europene și ale Comisiei Europene – Obiective și priorități de politică pentru perioada 2020-2024 ( JO C 451 I, 29.12.2020 ) | 2 |

Cuprins

Pagina

Rectificări

Rectificare la declarația comună a Parlamentului European, a Consiliului Uniunii Europene și a Comisiei Europene – Prioritățile legislative ale UE pentru 2021 ( JO C 451 I, 29.12.2020 )

( JO C 451 I, 29.12.2020 )

1

Rectificare la concluziile comune ale Parlamentului European, ale Consiliului Uniunii Europene și ale Comisiei Europene – Obiective și priorități de politică pentru perioada 2020-2024 ( JO C 451 I, 29.12.2020 )

( JO C 451 I, 29.12.2020 )

2

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

Rectificări

| 14.1.2021 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CI 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2021

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CI 15/1

---

Rectificare la declarația comună a Parlamentului European, a Consiliului Uniunii Europene și a Comisiei Europene – Prioritățile legislative ale UE pentru 2021

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 451 I din 29 decembrie 2020
  )

(2021/C 15 I/01)

Publicarea (2020/C 451 I/01) de la pagina 1 se consideră nulă și neavenită.

---

| 14.1.2021 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CI 15/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2021

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CI 15/2

---

Rectificare la concluziile comune ale Parlamentului European, ale Consiliului Uniunii Europene și ale Comisiei Europene – Obiective și priorități de politică pentru perioada 2020-2024

(
  Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 451 I din 29 decembrie 2020
  )

(2021/C 15 I/02)

Publicarea (2021/C 451 I/02) de la pagina 4 se consideră nulă și neavenită.

---
Christopher Richard STRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1042

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GARY GROOVER,

Appellant,

v.

SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-0018

[February 15, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Hon. Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502015CA012271.

Isidro M. Garcia of Garcia Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, for 

appellant.

Sean Fahey, Office of General Counsel, School Board of Palm Beach 

County, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Section 906 CFO Certifications EX-32 7 dex32.htm SECTION 906 CFO
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 Washington, DC
 
 The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Pilot Financial, Inc., Inc.
 do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
 Quarterly Report of Pilot Financial, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
 quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section
 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
 contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pilot Financial,
 Inc.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
 provided to Pilot Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Pilot
 Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
 Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/ William Baumgardner
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 Date: September 30, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1

### CFR Correction

In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1 (§§ 1.301 to 1.400), revised as of April 1, 2008, on page 306, in § 1.367(a)-6T, in paragraph (e)(5)(ii)(B), reinstate the remainder of the first sentence, following the word “some”, to read as follows: “. . . portion of which was recaptured on the disposition, of the recaptured portions of those overall foreign losses after multiplication by the following fraction:”.

[FR Doc. E9-7203 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### T H E SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION WAS H1 N G TO N , D.C. 20 5 90

Jun e 1 1 , 2 0 13

T h e Ho n o rab l e M ax B au cus Un i ted Stat e s Senat e Wa s hi ngto n D C 20510 D ear S e nato r B auc us: T han k y ou f

or y our s upp o rt o f the Ess e n tial A i r Se rv i c e (EA S ) pr o gr am . We underst and an d 

### appr e ci ate the 

### import anc e o f ai r 

### se rv i ce t o s m al l an d rural 

### communi ties a cr oss th e country , in c ludin g those i n 

### Montan a. A s you kno w, we rec e ntly i ss u e d an o r de r t e rmin ati ng th e e ligibili ty o f Lew isto w n and Mi le s City. Thiswas cons is tent wi th the r e quirement of 4 9 U.S. c . Section 417 3 1 (a)( 1 ) ( C) that t o r e mai n e ligibl e t o partici p ate in th e E AS p r og r am , co mmu n itie s mus t h ave had an ave r ag e sub s idy per pa sse n ge r of le ss th an $ ] , 000 during th e mo s t r e cent fisc al y ear. Your o ffi c e ha s r ai sed th e qu es ti o n o f whe th e r th ese tw o c o mmuni tie s c an appl y fo r re ins t atem e nt in th e EA S pro g ram . A s a p r o c e dur al m att e r , the c o mmun iti es c an f i le a P eti tio n fo r Reconsideration und e r 1 4 C.F . R. P art 3 02.14 or a moti o n under 1 4 C .F .R. Part 302 . 11 s eeking w h ate ve r re li e f th ey dee m ap p ro pri ate. T h e D e p artm e n t wo uld c o n s i de r any 

### arg um e nt s th at ar e m ad e in s up port o f s u c h a p e titi on or motio n . O f course . an y d ec i sion re a ch ed 

### by th e D e partment would need t o b e c o n s i s t e nt with th e p rov is i on s o f the 

### st atut e.

. . , S i ncere l y yo ur s , {

, t c i l l : j ~~ .

. $ ; " ' ~ 

# , ~

\

r /'

~ . 

# "
. . c \ t . l
Roger W. STUMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2408

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 23, 2018.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

In this appeal pursuant to *Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Roger W. Stump appeals the order that revokes his sexual offender probation after an evidentiary hearing and the resulting concurrent sentences for twenty-six counts of possession of child pornography. We affirm in all respects except as to count one.

Stump was placed on two years of sexual offender community control on count one in 2011. When the affidavit of violation of probation was filed in 2016, he had completed his community control on count one and was serving sexual offender probation on other counts. Because he had already completed his sentence on count one, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to impose a new sentence on that count. *See* *Deal v. State*, 162 So.3d 282, 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (stating that "the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose new sentences on the counts for which Mr. Deal had completed his probationary sentences"). Therefore, we reverse the sentence on count one and direct the trial court to enter an order vacating the sentence and to modify the revocation order to reflect this change. *See* *id.* In all other respects we affirm.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NPC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2011 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Troy D. Cook, Executive Vice-PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of NPC International, Inc., certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 28, 2011



/s/  Troy D. CookTroy D. Cook
Executive Vice PresidentFinance,
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer
June 3, 2015

Mr. Michael Anderson

506 2 nd Avenue South Great Falls, MT 59405

Dear Mr. Anderson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 5, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1436), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-194944, 333-189830 and 333-175469) and
on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-172891, 333-187563, 333-191248 and 333-212510) of our report dated April 2, 2018 relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                 | /s/ EKS&H LLLP
|---------------- | --------------
|                 |               
|April 2, 2018    |               
|Denver, Colorado |
Exhibit 4.7.2


 


 


 


 


	
    Additional Agreement No. 2

    to the LOAN AGREEMENT No. 2 

    dated 19 May 2021 

     

    30 November 2021

     

	
    Arras Minerals Corp., company established in
    accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, entity No. BC1287773, located at: Suite 1610, 777 Dunsmuir Street,
    Vancouver, Canada, V7Y 1K4, represented by CFO Mr. Christopher Richards, acting on basis of the Articles, hereinafter referred to as the
    “Creditor”, on one part, and

     

	Ekidos Minerals LLP, a limited liability partnership established in accordance
                                                        with the laws of the Republic of Kazakhstan, BIN 191040035309, located at: Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, 050000, Almaly district,
                                                        Panfilov Street 158, Office 1, represented by Confidant, Mrs. Vlada Nam, acting on the basis of the Power of Attorney dated
                                                        26.11.2021, hereinafter referred to as the “Debtor”, on the other part, hereinafter
                                                        collectively referred to as the “Parties” and individually as “Party”, have concluded this Additional
                                                        Agreement No. 2 to the Loan Agreement No. 2 dated 19 May 2021 (hereinafter – the “Agreement”) as
                                                        follows:

                                                         

	
    1. Clause 3.1 of Section 3 of the Agreement to revised
    as follows:

    “The Debtor shall repay the Loan in full on
    or before 30 June 2022 to the bank account of the Creditor as specified in this Agreement”.

     

	
    2. In all other matters that are not regulated by
    the terms of this Additional Agreement No. 2, the Parties are guided by the provisions of the Agreement.

     

	3. This Additional Agreement No. 2 enters into force on the
                                                                                                                         date of its signing.

                                                                                 

	SIGNATURES AND REQUISITES OF THE PARTIES:

                                                                                 

	
    On behalf of the Creditor

    Arras Minerals Corp.

     

    /s/ Christopher Richards  

    Christopher Richards

    CFO

     

	
    On behalf of the Debtor

    Ekidos Minerals LLP

     

     

    /s/ Vlada Nam  

    Vlada Nam

    Confidant