Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
 AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection project: “Assessing Organizational Responses to AHRQ's Health Literacy Pharmacy Tools.” In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed information collection. This proposed information collection was previously published in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         on January 29th, 2009 and allowed 60 days for public comment. No comments were received. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.
 DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by May 1, 2009.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ's OMB Desk Officer by fax at (202) 395-6974 (
                        *attention:*
                         AHRQ's desk officer) or by e-mail at 
                        *OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov*
                         (
                        *attention:*
                         AHRQ's desk officer). Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by e-mail at 
                        *doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov*.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: *Proposed Project:*
                     Assessing Organizational Responses to AHRQ's Health Literacy Pharmacy Tools. According to the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy, only 12 percent of adults have proficient health literacy—the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions. Limited health literacy often leads to medication errors. For example, one study found that a majority of adults with low health literacy did not understand instructions to “take medication on an empty stomach.” Overall, it is estimated that low health literacy costs the U.S. health care system $50 billion to $73 billion per year. Pharmacies can serve as an important source of medication information for people with limited health literacy, but relatively few pharmacies have implemented health literacy practices (Praska 
                    *et al.*, 2005). Recognizing that pharmacies may need outside knowledge and assistance to improve their health literacy practices, AHRQ, through a previous task order, supported the creation of the following four health literacy tools for pharmacy settings, which have been validated in institutional pharmacy settings. 1. Is Our Pharmacy Meeting Patients' Needs? A Pharmacy Health Literacy Assessment Tool User's Guide (Jacobson 
                    *et al.*, 2007). 2. Strategies to improve Communication between Staff and Patients: Training Program for Pharmacy Staff (Kripalini & Jacobson, 2007). 3. How to Create a Pill Card (Jacobson 
                    *et al.*, 2008). 4. Telephone Reminders: A Tool to Help Refill Medications on Time (Jacobson 
                    *et al.*, 2008). AHRQ now proposes to distribute these tools to a more diverse set of pharmacies and to conduct in-depth case studies to enhance our understanding about the conditions that may facilitate or impede the adoption of the tools in these settings. AHRQ would use insights gained to develop materials (promotional implementation guides) that could assist interested pharmacies in putting the tools into practice and anticipating and overcoming obstacles to doing so. The pharmacy health literacy tools will be disseminated through an AHRQ Web site, which will also provide technical assistance to pharmacies that wish to implement the tools. A description of the tools and site will be distributed to pharmacists through national pharmacy organizations' trade publications and a direct mailing to chain pharmacy headquarters. We anticipate that we would be able to reach as many as 60,000 individual pharmacists across the country through these channels. This project is being conducted pursuant to AHRQ's statutory authority to conduct and support research on health care and on systems for the delivery of such care, including activities with respect to: The quality, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness and value of health care services; quality measurement and improvement; and health care costs, productivity, organization, and market forces. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1), (2), and (6). Method of Collection Case Studies Through its contractor, AHRQ proposes to conduct 7 in-depth case studies to assess pharmacies' experiences with implementation of one or more of these four health literacy tools, using interviews, site visits, review of documents and a survey of pharmacy staff from case study pharmacies. In addition, AHRQ will conduct 2 more limited studies of pharmacies that were aware of the tools but chose not to implement them. A 1-day site visit will be conducted with each of the 7 sites that implement at least one of the tools. Each site visit will include a walk-through of the pharmacy site to see the physical layout, an interview with the key informant or contact person, and individual interviews with up to four additional pharmacy employees, who may include the pharmacy manager, staff pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and pharmacy clerks. Therefore, up to 35 interviews will be completed across the 7 sites that implement one or more of the tools. In addition, up to 12 pharmacy staff at each of the 7 implementation sites will complete the tool's Pharmacy Staff Survey contained in the Pharmacy Health Literacy Assessment Tool. For each of the two pharmacies which do not implement the tools, interviews will be conducted with up to 2 informants per site. The content of this interview will be similar, but not identical, to the interviews with staff at the implementing sites. Web Site Visitors' Survey For pharmacists and other visitors to the AHRQ Web site, we will conduct a voluntary survey regarding health literacy in general, and feedback regarding AHRQ's health literacy tools. The Web site visitors' survey will be available on-line. Estimated Annual Respondent Burden Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the respondents' time to participate in the case studies. The staff interview at the implementing sites will be completed with up to 5 total pharmacy staff members from each of the 7 pharmacies that implement at least one of the health literacy tools. Staff interviews at the two 
                    ( print page 14804)
                    non-implementation sites will be completed with up to 2 individuals per pharmacy. The interviews are estimated to last 1 hour for each of the 5 staff interviews at the 7 implementing sites and 30 minutes for each of the 2 staff interviews at the 2 non-implementing sites. The pharmacy staff survey will be completed by up to 12 staff from the 7 implementation pharmacies and is estimated to take approximately 20 minutes. Lastly, we estimate that the Web site visitor's survey will be completed by about 150 respondents and is estimated to take up to 12 minutes to complete. The total burden hours for all data collections is estimated to be 95 hours. Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annualized cost burden for the respondents' time to provide the requested data. The estimated total cost burden is $2,882. Exhibit 1—Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
Form name
Number of sites/
                             respondents
Number of responses per sites/
                             respondents
Hours per
                             response
Total burden hoursStaff interview—implementing sites
7
5
1
35Staff interview—non-implementing sites
2
2
30/60
2Pharmacy staff survey
7
12
20/60
28Web site visitors survey
150
1
12/60
30Total
166


95
 Exhibit 2—Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
Form name
Number of sites/
                             respondents
Total burden hours
Average
                             hourly wage rate*
Total cost
                             burdenStaff interview—implementing sites
7
35
$30.33
$1,062Staff interview—non-implementing sites
2
2
30.33
61Pharmacy staff survey
7
28
30.33
849Web site visitors survey
150
30
30.33
910Total
166
95

2,882*The average hourly wage rate of $30.33 was calculated based on the following mean hourly wage rates: Pharmacists—$47.58; pharmacy manager [medical & health services manager category]—$50.34; pharmacy technicians—$13.25; and pharmacy aides—$10.15. The mean hourly wage rates for these occupations were obtained from the Bureau of Labor & Statistics on “Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2007,” found at: 
                        *http://www.bls.gov/​OES/​current/​oes291051.htm.*
 Estimated Annual Costs to the Government The total cost of this contract to the government is $400,000. The project extends over three fiscal years. Exhibit 3 shows a breakdown of the total cost as well as the annualized cost. Exhibit 3—Estimated Cost
Cost component
Total cost
Annualized costProject Development
$54,822
$18,274Data Collection Activities
111,509
37,170Data Processing and Analysis
129,089
43,030Publication of Results
63,736
21,245Project Management
40,845
13,615Total
400,000
133,333
 Request for Comments In accordance with the above cited legislation, comments on the AHRQ information collection proposal are requested with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of AHRQ, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity on the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval of the proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of public record. Dated: March 20, 2009. Carolyn M. Clancy, Director.


[FR Doc. E9-6957 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-90-M