alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX PARTE Robert Carl BANNON

CR-16-0028

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to DeKalb Cir. Ct.
Cassandra Claudia BONETA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Nicholas Richard PRIMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Thomas Andrew HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3460

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 6, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
 
 I, Jeff Baisley, Chief Financial Officer of Graham Capital Management L.P. and I, Paul Sedlack, Chief Executive Officer of Graham Capital Management L.P., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 1.
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Graham Alternative Investment Fund I LLC (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: March 30, 2011
 
 /s/ Jeff Baisley
 Jeff Baisley
 Chief Financial Officer
 Graham Capital Management L.P.
 
 /s/ Paul Sedlack
 Paul Sedlack
 Chief Executive Officer
 Graham Capital Management L.P.
STATE of Louisiana v. Shawn BECNEL

NO. 2017-KO-1023

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.
Bruce UNDERHILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-433

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar S. CONTRERAS, Defendant— Appellant.

No. 03-30337.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Gregory M. Shogren, Esq., Jill K. Bolton, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Diane E. Hehir, Esq., Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar S. Contreras appeals his 121-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

Contreras contends that the government breached the plea agreement by arguing *762that Contreras’ leadership role precluded application of the “safety valve” provision pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 5C1.2. The record shows that the government upheld all of its obligations under the plea agreement, opposed a two-level increase for being the leader/organizer of the conspiracy, and recommended a sentence at the low end of the applicable guideline range. The plea agreement contained no language about the “safety valve” provision or its applicability to Contreras. Accordingly, the government did not breach the plea agreement by opposing Contreras’ request for “safety valve” relief. *See United States v. Maldonado,*215 F.3d 1046, 1051-52 (9th Cir.2000).

Contreras next contends that the district court erred in applying a two-level increase based on his leadership role in the offense pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3B1.1. Because the presentence report contains sufficient uncontested facts to support this enhancement, we find no error. *See id.*at 1050-51.

Finally, because the district court properly determined that Contreras was a leader or organizer pursuant to section 3B1.1, he is ineligible for safety valve relief. *See*U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(4) (providing that safety valve is not available to defendants who are the leader, organizer, manager or supervisor of others in the offense).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EX PARTE King Aron WILLIAMS

1151285 (CR-15-0102)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Eugenio GUIDA-BERNIA and Roquelina Ferreira, Appellant(s)/petitioner(s), v. Stephen FOSTER, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-1184

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# Euroopan unionin C 15I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 015I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 64. vuosikerta14. tammikuu 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 015I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

64. vuosikerta14. tammikuu 2021

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | Oikaisuja |
| | Oikaisu Euroopan parlamentin, Euroopan unionin neuvoston ja Euroopan komission yhteiseen julistukseen EU:n lainsäädännön painopisteet vuonna 2021 ( EUVL C 451 I, 29.12.2020 ) | 1 |
| | Oikaisu Euroopan parlamentin, Euroopan unionin neuvoston ja Euroopan komission yhteisiin päätelmiin aiheesta Toimintapoliittiset tavoitteet ja prioriteetit 2020–2024 ( EUVL C 451 I, 29.12.2020 ) | 2 |

Sisältö

Sivu

Oikaisuja

Oikaisu Euroopan parlamentin, Euroopan unionin neuvoston ja Euroopan komission yhteiseen julistukseen EU:n lainsäädännön painopisteet vuonna 2021 ( EUVL C 451 I, 29.12.2020 )

( EUVL C 451 I, 29.12.2020 )

1

Oikaisu Euroopan parlamentin, Euroopan unionin neuvoston ja Euroopan komission yhteisiin päätelmiin aiheesta Toimintapoliittiset tavoitteet ja prioriteetit 2020–2024 ( EUVL C 451 I, 29.12.2020 )

( EUVL C 451 I, 29.12.2020 )

2

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Oikaisuja

| 14.1.2021 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2021

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 15/1

---

Oikaisu Euroopan parlamentin, Euroopan unionin neuvoston ja Euroopan komission yhteiseen julistukseen EU:n lainsäädännön painopisteet vuonna 2021

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 451 I, 29. joulukuuta 2020
  )

(2021/C 15 I/01)

Julistuksen (2021/C 451 I/01), sivulla 1, julkaisemisen oikeusvaikutukset peruutetaan.

---

| 14.1.2021 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 15/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2021

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 15/2

---

Oikaisu Euroopan parlamentin, Euroopan unionin neuvoston ja Euroopan komission yhteisiin päätelmiin aiheesta Toimintapoliittiset tavoitteet ja prioriteetit 2020–2024

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 451 I, 29. joulukuuta 2020
  )

(2021/C 15 I/02)

Julkaisun (2021/C 451 I/02), sivulla 4, julkaisemisen oikeusvaikutukset peruutetaan.

---
Exhibit 35.1







SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



For the period of June 9, 2009 to December 31, 2009, the servicing of consumer finance receivables owned by BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2009-1 has been conducted by BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, in its capacity as servicer, in compliance with the servicing standards in all material respects, set forth in Article II of the Servicing Supplement dated June 9, 2009.  To the best of the undersigneds knowledge, based on such review, the servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.



By:

BMW Financial Services NA, LLC



By:  /s/ Martin Stremplat



Martin Stremplat

Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Manuel Antonio RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1268

Supreme Court of Florida.

[January 31, 2018]

Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Marta Jaszczolt, Staff Attorney, and Marie-Louise Samuels Parmer, Special Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Melissa J. Roca, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Manuel Antonio Rodriguez's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Rodriguez's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Rodriguez's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *919*Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Rodriguez's appeal pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Rodriguez responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Rodriguez's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Rodriguez is not entitled to relief. A jury convicted Rodriguez of three counts of first-degree murder, and the trial court sentenced Rodriguez to death on each count after the jury unanimously recommended a sentence of death for each count. *Rodriguez v. State*, 753 So.2d 29, 35 (Fla. 2000). Rodriguez's sentences of death became final in 2000. *Rodriguez v. Florida*, 531 U.S. 859, 121 S.Ct. 145, 148 L.Ed.2d 96 (2000). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Rodriguez's sentences of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Rodriguez's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Rodriguez, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.
**Exhibit32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the KMG America Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of KMG America Corporation.

 
| /s/ Scott H. DeLong III                              | Date: March 31,  2005 |
|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Scott H. DeLong III                                  |                       |
| Senior Vice President & Chief Financial  Officer |                       |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                        |                       |
|                                                      |                            |  |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to KMG America Corporation and will be retained by KMG AmericaCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCIAL SERVICESOF TRM CORPORATIONAS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Daniel E. O’Brien,Senior Vice President, Financial Services of TRM Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report of the Company onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 14, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Daniel  E. O’Brien                |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Daniel E.  O’Brien                    |
|                          |   | Senior Vice  President, Financial Services |

 

----
Document

Exhibit 10.16

TEXTRON INC.
COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS SUMMARY
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
 (EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2022)
 
						
	COMPENSATION

	 

	Cash Retainer	Non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer of $125,000 which is paid in quarterly installments at the end of each full calendar quarter. Payments are prorated for partial calendar quarters served. 


Committee chairpersons are paid an additional annual retainer, as follows: Audit, $15,000; Nominating and Corporate Governance, $20,000; and Organization and Compensation, $20,000. The Lead Director is paid an additional $35,000 annual retainer. Audit Committee members (including the Audit Committee chairperson) are paid an additional $15,000 annual retainer.  The additional retainers are paid in cash in quarterly installments at the end of each full quarter, and payments are prorated for partial calendar quarters served.

		
	Equity Program	As of the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, for each year beginning on or after January 1, 2020, each non-employee director elected at such meeting shall be granted Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) valued at $145,000. The RSUs will be issued under, and subject to the terms of, the Textron Inc. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan Equity Program for Non-Employee Directors, The RSUs will vest one year from the date of grant unless the director elects to defer settlement of the RSUs until his or her separation from Board service. Upon vesting, the RSUs will be settled in shares of Common Stock.

	 	
	 	 
	Meeting Fees	There are no fees payable for attendance at any Board or committee meetings.
	 	 
		
	 	 
	DEFERRED INCOME PLAN

	 	 
	 	Any percentage of the cash portion of the annual Board retainer ($125,000) or any percentage of the additional retainers may be deferred into either the stock unit account or an interest-bearing account under the Deferred Income Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
	 	 
	OTHER	 
	 	 
	Expenses	Reasonable travel, lodging and incidental expenses in connection with meetings are reimbursed.
	 	 
	Matching 
Gift Program
	The Textron Charitable Trust will match Director contributions from a minimum gift of $25 to an aggregate maximum of $7,500 annually to any mix of cultural, educational, environmental or hospital institutions on a $1 for $1 basis.
	 	 
	Directors’ Charitable	 [Closed to New Participants as of January 1, 2004]

	Award Program
May 1, 1997

Labroc II Limited Partnership ("Seller")
c/o The Balcor Company
Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
2355 Waukegan Road
Suite A-200
Bannockburn, Illinois  60015
Attention:  Ilona Adams

Near North National Title Corporation ("Escrow Agent")
222 North LaSalle Street
First Floor
Chicago, Illinois  60601
Attention:  Lou Cohen

     Re:  Purchase Agreement dated March 18, 1997, as amended (the "Purchase 
          Agreement") between Seller and Crosstown Asset Corp. I ("Purchaser") 
          for Ross Plaza, Federal Way, Washington

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Purchaser hereby terminates the Purchase Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1
thereof.  Attached is the required Due Diligence Termination Notice.  Escrow
Agent is hereby directed to return the earnest money together with all interest
accrued thereon to Purchaser in accordance with the attached wiring
instructions.

                         Sincerely,

                         CROSSTOWN ASSET CORP. I, a Delaware corporation

                         By:   /s/ Thomas Heller
                              -------------------------------
                         Name:     Thomas Heller
                              -------------------------------
                         Its:      Vice President
                              -------------------------------

cc:  The Balcor Company
     Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
     2355 Waukegan Road
     Suite A-200
     Bannockburn, Illinois  60015
     Attention:  James Mendelson

     Katten Muchin & Zavis
     525 West Monroe Street
     Suite 1600
     Chicago, Illinois  60661-3693
     Attention:  Daniel J. Perlman, Esq.
<PAGE>
                       DUE DILIGENCE TERMINATION NOTICE

                              May 1, 1997

     Crosstown Asset Corp. I, a Delaware corporation, as Purchaser under that
certain Agreement of Sale dated March 18, 1997, as amended, providing for the
sale of property located in Federal Way, Washington and known as Ross Plaza has
terminated the Agreement of Sale pursuant to Paragraph 7.1 thereof.

     The undersigned demands return of all earnest money deposited under the
Agreement of Sale pursuant to its right therein.


                              CROSSTOWN ASSET CORP. I, a Delaware corporation

                              By:   /s/ Thomas Haller
                                   --------------------------------
                              Name:     Thomas Haller
                                   --------------------------------
                              Its:      Vice President
                                   --------------------------------
<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7678]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Alaska Individual Fishing Quota Cost Recovery Program 
Requirements.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0398.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 5,984.
    Number of Respondents: 2,500.
    Average Hours per Response: 2 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act requires that the Secretary of Commerce maintain a Cost 
Recovery Program to cover the management and enforcement costs of the 
Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQ) for Pacific Halibut and Sablefish in 
the Alaska Fisheries Program. This Cost Recovery Program requires 
Registered Buyers to submit information about the volume and value of 
IFQ species landings and for the IFQ permit holders to calculate and 
submit fees.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
[email protected]).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
[email protected].

    Dated: April 1, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-7678 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
SUNTRUST BANK, Appellant, v. Karen BOLGER, as personal representative of the estate of Peter S. Bolger, deceased, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-1155

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joe Nathan TUBBS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-0229

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

The application is transferred to the district court with instructions to the district judge to act on relator's motion for definitive ruling on claim requesting a nunc pro tunc determination of competency to proceed as relator shows by Inmate's Request for Legal/Indigent Mail receipt that the application was submitted on or about November 20, 2017. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment. A copy of the application is attached.