alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

d0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144542

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144542 COA: 308103 Oakland CC: 2001-180525-FH WILLIAM SIM SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00663]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 18 January 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, 
parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our website: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#187b7e796b6c797e7e587b7e79367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="147772756760757272547772753a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, on January 10, 2018.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00663 Filed 1-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6330-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Gary CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3452

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document

Exhibit 10.04
AMENDMENT NO. 1 
TO THE 
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION 
2020 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


WHEREAS, Valero Energy Corporation (“Valero”) has adopted and maintains the Valero Energy Corporation 2020 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “2020 OSIP”) which provides eligible employees and members of the board of directors (the “Board”) of Valero with additional incentives through the grant of awards;


WHEREAS, Section 10.1 of the 2020 OSIP permits the compensation committee of Valero’s Board (the “Compensation Committee”), subject to certain conditions set forth in the 2020 OSIP, to approve certain alterations, amendments and revisions the 2020 OSIP and any outstanding awards granted thereunder (“2020 OSIP Awards”) without the consent of 2020 OSIP participants; 


WHEREAS, Valero desires to amend the 2020 OSIP effective as of October 1, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), which amendment would also apply effective as of the Amendment Effective Date to any then outstanding 2020 OSIP Awards, in order to revise the definition of “Fair Market Value” for certain administrative, record keeping and other purposes; 


WHEREAS, this Amendment No. 1 to the 2020 OSIP (this “Amendment No. 1”), and its application to any 2020 OSIP Awards outstanding as of the Amendment Effective Date, has been approved by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the terms of the 2020 OSIP;


NOW, THEREFORE, the 2020 OSIP is hereby amended, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, in the following respects, which shall also apply, and be incorporated into the terms of, any 2020 OSIP Awards outstanding as of the Amendment Effective Date:


1.Fair Market Value. The definition of “Fair Market Value” set forth in Section 2.16 of the 2020 OSIP is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“2.16  “Fair Market Value” of a share of Common Stock is the mean of the highest and lowest prices per share on the New York Stock Exchange on the pertinent date, or in the absence of reported sales on such day, then on the immediately preceding day for which sales were reported.”


2.Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 1, each of the capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning given to such term in the 2020 OSIP.


3.Further Amendments. Except as expressly amended hereby, the 2020 OSIP and any outstanding 2020 OSIP Awards, shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms.


[Signature page follows.]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment No. 1 effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.


Valero Energy Corporation




By:    /s/ Joseph W. Gorder            
Officer: Joseph W. Gorder
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Signature Page – Amendment No. 1 to 2020 OSIP
Issac L. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 2, 2008, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 8, 2008, (73 FR 58979), Clinical Supplies 
Management, Inc., 342 42nd. Street, South Fargo, North Dakota 58103, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as an importer of Sufentanil (9740), a basic 
class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for 
clinical trials, research, and analytical purposes.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of Clinical Supplies Management, Inc. to import the basic 
class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, 
and with United States obligations under international treaties, 
conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA 
has investigated Clinical Supplies Management, Inc. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted 
registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance 
listed.

    Dated: January 9, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E9-733 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,140,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      48,364,985
<DEPRECIATION>                            (24,502,737)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,770,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     22,948,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,770,921
<SALES>                                      1,940,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,953,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,452,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             518,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,793)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7630
GEORGE HENSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAM JONES; KEITH WALDROP, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1272-AM) Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Henson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Henson v. Jones , No. CA-98-1272-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS IN the MATTER OF Walter C. DUMAS and Walter C. Dumas & Associates, Inc.

NO. 2018-C-0132

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant and docket.
CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11

             BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE COMPUTATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                          MARCH 31, 2001       MARCH 31, 2001
                                          BASIC   DILUTED    BASIC     DILUTED
                                         -------  --------  --------  ---------
<S>                                      <C>      <C>       <C>       <C>
Average outstanding shares                55,021    55,021   54,558     54,558
Dilutive effect of options and warrants        -     2,104        -          -
                                         -------  --------  --------  ---------
Equivalent shares                         55,021    57,125   54,558     54,558
                                         =======  ========  ========  =========

Net income (loss) available to common
  Stockholders                           $   802  $    802  $(4,688)  $ (4,688)
                                         =======  ========  ========  =========
Earnings (loss) per share                $  0.01  $   0.01  $ (0.09)  $  (0.09)
                                         =======  ========  ========  =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED    NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                           MARCH 31, 2000        MARCH 31, 2000
                                          BASIC     DILUTED     BASIC     DILUTED
                                         --------  ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                      <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>
Average outstanding shares                53,503     53,503     51,335     51,335
Dilutive effect of options and warrants        -          -          -          -
                                         --------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Equivalent shares                         53,503     53,503     51,335     51,335
                                         ========  =========  =========  =========

Net income (loss) available to common
  stockholders                           $(2,215)  $ (2,215)  $(21,387)  $(21,387)
                                         ========  =========  =========  =========
Earnings (loss) per share                $ (0.04)  $  (0.04)  $  (0.42)  $  (0.42)
                                         ========  =========  =========  =========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 844 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 844

 Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival 
                               of Diwali.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2023

   Mr. Krishnamoorthi (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Khanna, Mr. 
Pascrell, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Pallone, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. 
 Thanedar, Mr. Veasey, Mr. Costa, Ms. Jayapal, and Mr. Bera) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival 
                               of Diwali.

Whereas for millions of Indian-Americans, Diwali (or Deepavali) is a time for 
        thanksgiving and prayer for health, knowledge, and peace;
Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian-Americans, is 
        celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and others throughout the 
        United States;
Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants light small oil 
        lamps, place them around the home, and pray for health, knowledge, and 
        peace;
Whereas celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of lamps symbolize the light 
        within the individual that rids the soul of the darkness of ignorance;
Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the lunar calendar and 
        is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving and the beginning of the New Year 
        for many Hindus;
Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the belief that light triumphs 
        over darkness, and good triumphs over evil;
Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day on which the sixth founding Sikh 
        guru, Guru Hargobind, was released from captivity by the Mughal Emperor 
        Jehangir;
Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of Nirvana by 
        Lord Mahavira, the last of the Tirthankaras (founders of the Jain 
        philosophy); and
Whereas Diwali is a celebration of great importance in Indian-American 
        communities throughout the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the historical and religious significance of 
        Diwali;
            (2) in observance of Diwali, the festival of lights, 
        expresses its deepest respect for Indian-Americans and the 
        Indian diaspora throughout the world on this significant 
        occasion;
            (3) recognizes and appreciates the religious diversity in 
        both India and the United States and throughout the world; and
            (4) acknowledges and supports the relationship of 
        collaboration and respect between the United States and India.
                                 <all>
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1085 

To provide authorization for nonpecuniary damages in an action resulting 

from a cruise ship voyage occurring on the high seas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To provide authorization for nonpecuniary damages in an 

action resulting from a cruise ship voyage occurring on 

the high seas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hammers’ Law’’. 

5 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS IN CERTAIN CASES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30307 of title 46, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1085 IS

1 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘Com2 mercial aviation accidents’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘Limitations in certain cases’’; 

4 (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 ‘‘(1) CRUISE SHIP.—The term ‘cruise ship’ 

8 means a passenger vessel, other than a vessel of the 

9 United States operated by the Federal Government 

10 or a vessel owned and operated by a State, that— 

11 ‘‘(A) is authorized to carry at least 250 

12 passengers; 

13 ‘‘(B) has onboard sleeping facilities for 

14 each passenger; 

15 ‘‘(C) is on a voyage that embarks or dis16 embarks passengers in the United States; and 

17 ‘‘(D) is not engaged on a coastwise voyage. 

18 ‘‘(2) NONPECUNIARY DAMAGES.—The term 

19 ‘nonpecuniary damages’ means damages for loss of 

20 care, comfort, and companionship.’’; 

21 (3) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘or cruise 

22 ship voyage’’ after ‘‘commercial aviation’’; and 

23 (4) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘or cruise 

24 ship voyage’’ after ‘‘commercial aviation’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 1085 IS

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for chapter 303 of title 46, United States Code, is amend3 ed by striking the item relating to section 30307 and in4 serting the following: 

‘‘30307. Limitations in certain cases.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
D.K.W., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-882

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Home | Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) | US EPA

http://www.epa.gov/cgi-bin/iursrch3_2002.cgi [12/7/2011 2:59:13 PM] EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us http://www.epa.gov/cgi-bin/iursrch3_2002.cgi Print As-Is Last updated on Wednesday, December 07, 2011 You are here: EPA Home Inventory Update Reporting Data Search Results 

# Inventory Update Reporting (IUR)

Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA This Area

Search by casno for 131-18-0

CAS No. 1986 Range 1990 Range 1994 Range 1998 Range 2002 Range Chemical Name No Match IUR Home Basic Information IUR Data About Submissions Confidentiality Resources Petitions for Partial

Exemption Share
Sean Tavaris CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael J. Smith, President and Secretary of
Blue Earth Refineries Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Blue Earth Refineries
      Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Blue Earth Refineries Inc.                                                             

Dated: November 21, 2007

/s/ Michael J.
SmithMichael J. Smith President and Secretary(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Blue Earth
Refineries Inc. and will be retained by Blue Earth Refineries Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Kari CHIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.
Brittany Simone SWIFT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.