alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.2





DeGolyer
and MacNaughton

5001 Spring
Valley Road



Suite
800 East



Dallas,
Texas 75244









April 11,
2017



GeoPark Limited



Nuestra Señora de los
Ángeles 179



Las Condes, Santiago, Chile





Ladies and Gentlemen:



As
an independent petroleum consulting firm, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference to our year-end 2016 third-party
letter report dated April 11, 2017, and to our audit letter to Price-Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L. dated March 4, 2017,
to be used under certain headings contained in the Annual Report of Geopark Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2016, and specified in our consent letter dated April 11, 2017, to GeoPark Limited, which is referenced in the previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-201016 and 33-214291) under “PART II,” “Item 3. Incorporation
of Documents by Reference.”







| |  |  |  | Very truly yours,                       | 
| |  |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
| |  |  |  | /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton            | 
| |  |  |  | DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON                | 
| |  |  |  | Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716 | 























DeGolyer
and MacNaughton

5001 Spring
Valley Road



Suite
800 East



Dallas,
Texas 75244







April 11, 2017



GeoPark Limited

Nuestra Señora de los Ángeles
179

Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

Ladies and Gentlemen:



We
hereby consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton and to the inclusion of and information derived from the DeGolyer
and MacNaughton 2016 year-end third-party letter report (our “Report”) dated April 11, 2017, regarding our independent
estimates of the net proved oil and condensate, gas, and oil equivalent reserves, as of December 31, 2016, of certain selected
properties in which GeoPark Limited has represented that it owns an interest in Chile, Colombia, Brazil, and Peru, as set forth
under the headings “Presentation of Financial and Other Information–Oil and gas reserves and prodution information,”
“Item 3. Key Information–D. Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company,” “Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects–A. Operating Results,” and “Item 19–Exhibits,” and
as Exhibit no. 99.1 in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of GeoPark Limited (the “Annual Report”).



We
confirm that we have read the Annual Report and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information
contained therein that are derived from our Report or that are within our knowledge as a result of the services performed by us
in connection with the preparation of our Report.







| |  |  |  | Very truly yours,                       | 
| |  |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
| |  |  |  | /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton            | 
| |  |  |  | DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON                | 
| |  |  |  | Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716 |
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Scott Lindberg v. Scott Callahan

Appellate case number: 01-19-00559-CV

Trial court case number: 19-DCV-262220

Trial court: 458th District Court of Fort Bend County

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order, signed July 19, 2019, sealing 

certain trial court documents. Appellee filed in this Court a motion to seal the appellate record and 

briefs. Observing that no authority permits an appellate court to seal trial court documents, this 

Court issued an order in October abating the appeal and remanding for the trial court to consider 

whether to seal any additional trial court documents. If the trial court issued an order sealing 

additional documents, the court was directed to see that a supplemental clerk’s record was filed in 

this Court containing the sealing order. 

At appellant’s request, this Courtsubsequently issued an order, clarifying that the trial court 

was not directed to reconsider its previous sealing order, but was ordered to consider additional 

documents that appellee argued should be sealed. In this order, the reporter’s record, appellee’s 

motion to seal, and appellant’s brief were also ordered sealed because they contained or discussed 

the content of an order already sealed by the trial court. The Court further ordered that appellee’s 

brief, when filed, would also be filed under seal.

Although a supplemental clerk’s record was filed in January 2020, it contained no trial 

court order sealing any additional trial court documents. At appellant’s urging, this Court extended

until February 25, 2020 the deadline for the trial court to consider sealing additional documents. 

On February 27, 2020, appellant filed a motion to reinstate, and appellee has not filed a response 

to that motion. To this Court’s knowledge, the trial court has not issued any additional orders 

sealing documents, and because the trial court has had more than four months to rule, the failure 

to rule indicates that no ruling will occur.

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion to reinstate and reinstates this appeal on 

the active docket. Appellee’s brief, to be filed under seal, is due within 30 days of the date of this 

order. 

It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: ___Justice Richard Hightower________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __March 17, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7546]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 04/04-0298]


C3 Capital Partners II, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under 
Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that C3 Capital Partners II, L.P., 4520 Main 
Street, Suite 1600, Kansas City, MO 64111, a Federal Licensee under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest, of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). C3 
Capital Partners II, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security 
financing to Findett, LLC, 8 Governor Drive, St. Charles, MO 63301. The 
financing is contemplated for the acquisition of a supplier and growth 
capital.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because C3 Capital Partners, L.P. an Associate of C3 
Capital Partners II, L.P., owns more than ten percent of Findett, LLC; 
therefore Findett, LLC is considered an Associate of C3 Capital 
Partners II, L.P., as defined in Sec. 105.50 of the regulations.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
Harry E. Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. E9-7546 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.2
**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the quarterly report of Landmark Land Company, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Joe V. Olree, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   August 11, 2004 /s/ JOE V. OLREEJoe V. OlreeVice President and Chief Financial OfficerLandmark Land Company, Inc.
Jerry Lamar GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1643

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 06, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 06, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A0460. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. 

DANIEL LACOSTE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1062 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to restore and standardize 

work requirements for able-bodied adults enrolled in the supplemental 

nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to restore 

and standardize work requirements for able-bodied adults 

enrolled in the supplemental nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs and Opportunities 

5 for SNAP Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1062 IS

1 SEC. 2. RESTORING THE WORK REQUIREMENT FOR ABLE2 BODIED ADULTS WITHOUT DEPENDENTS IN 

3 THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSIST4 ANCE PROGRAM. 

5 Section 2301 of the Families First Coronavirus Re6 sponse Act (7 U.S.C. 2011 note; Public Law 116–127) 

7 is repealed. 

8 SEC. 3. STANDARDIZING WORK REQUIREMENTS FOR ABLE9 BODIED ADULTS IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL NU10 TRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(o) of the Food and Nu12 trition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2015(o)) is amended— 

13 (1) in paragraph (3)— 

14 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘50’’ 

15 and inserting ‘‘65’’; and 

16 (B) in subparagraph (C), by inserting 

17 ‘‘under 7 years of age’’ after ‘‘child’’; 

18 (2) by striking paragraph (4); 

19 (3) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through 

20 (7) as paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; and 

21 (4) in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated)— 

22 (A) in subparagraph (A)(ii)— 

23 (i) by striking subclause (II); 

24 (ii) by redesignating subclauses (III) 

25 through (V) as subclauses (II) through 

26 (IV), respectively; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 1062 IS

1 (iii) in subclause (IV) (as so redesig2 nated), by striking ‘‘(5)’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘(4)’’; 

4 (B) in subparagraph (E)— 

5 (i) by striking ‘‘12’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘3’’; and 

7 (ii) by striking ‘‘caseload and’’ and all 

8 that follows through the period at the end 

9 and inserting ‘‘caseload.’’; and 

10 (C) in subparagraph (G), by inserting 

11 ‘‘that begins before the date of enactment of 

12 the Jobs and Opportunities for SNAP Act of 

13 2023’’ after ‘‘subsequent fiscal year’’. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 

15 16(h)(1)(E)(ii) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 

16 U.S.C. 2025(h)(1)(E)(ii)) is amended— 

17 (1) in subclause (II), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the 

18 end; 

19 (2) by striking subclause (III); 

20 (3) by redesignating subclause (IV) as sub21 clause (III); and 

22 (4) in subclause (III) (as so redesignated), by 

23 striking ‘‘6(o)(6)’’ and inserting ‘‘6(o)(5)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Servicer Compliance Statement
     /s/ JOHN F. REMONDIJohn F. RemondiVice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

Sallie Mae, Inc.




---



##### 



Appendix A
 Trust Name:
    
    Date of Issuance:SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-1
    
    January 26, 2006SLM
Student Loan Trust 2006-2
    
    February 23, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-3
    
    March 9, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-4
    
    April 20, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-5
    
    June 21, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-6
    
    July 20, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-7
    
    August 10, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-8
    
    September 14, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-9
    
    October 12, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-10
    
    November 30, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-A
    
    April 6, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-B
    
    June 8, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-C
    
    September 28, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-1
    
    January 25, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-2
    
    February 22, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-3
    
    March 15, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-4
    
    April 5, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-5
    
    July 19, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-6
    
    October 23, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-7
    
    November 8, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-8
    
    December 6, 2007SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2007-A
    
    March 29, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-1
    
    January 17, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-2
    
    February 7, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-3
    
    February 28, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-4
    
    April 17, 2008Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-3
    
    April 24, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-5
    
    April 30, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-6
    
    June 12, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-7
    
    July 2, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-8
    
    August 5, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-9
    
    August 28, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2009-1
    
    April 9, 2009SLM Student Loan Trust 2009-2
    
    April 21, 2009
Harold ALTIDOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2345

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1063 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to implement a minimum 

work requirement for able-bodied adults enrolled in State Medicaid programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to implement 

a minimum work requirement for able-bodied adults enrolled in State Medicaid programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs and Opportunities 

5 for Medicaid Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WORK REQUIREMENTS FOR ABLE-BODIED ADULTS. 

7 Section 1902 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1396a) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1063 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para2 graph (86); 

3 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

4 paragraph (87) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (C) by inserting after paragraph (87) the 

6 following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(88) beginning January 1, 2024, not provide 

8 medical assistance with respect to a month to an 

9 able-bodied adult (as defined in subsection (uu)(2)) 

10 that has not met the work requirement described in 

11 subsection (uu)(1) for such month.’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub13 section: 

14 ‘‘(uu) WORK REQUIREMENT FOR ABLE-BODIED

15 ADULTS.— 

16 ‘‘(1) WORK REQUIREMENT DESCRIBED.—For 

17 purposes of subsection (a)(88), the work require18 ment described in this subsection with respect to an 

19 able-bodied adult and a month is that such adult 

20 satisfies at least one of the following with respect to 

21 such month: 

22 ‘‘(A) The adult works 20 hours or more 

23 per week, based on a monthly average. 

24 ‘‘(B) The adult volunteers for 20 hours or 

25 more per week, based on a monthly average. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 1063 IS

1 ‘‘(2) ABLE-BODIED ADULT DEFINED.—In this 

2 subsection the term ‘able-bodied adult’ means any 

3 individual who is not— 

4 ‘‘(A) under 18 years of age or over 65 

5 years of age; 

6 ‘‘(B) medically certified as physically or 

7 mentally unfit for employment; 

8 ‘‘(C) pregnant; 

9 ‘‘(D) the primary parent or caretaker of a 

10 dependent child under 6 years of age; 

11 ‘‘(E) the primary parent or caretaker of a 

12 dependent child with a serious medical condi13 tion or disability, as determined by the State 

14 agency established or designated to administer 

15 or supervise the administration of the State 

16 plan; 

17 ‘‘(F) receiving unemployment compensa18 tion under State or Federal law and, as applica19 ble, complying with work requirements under 

20 such State or Federal law; or 

21 ‘‘(G) participating in a drug or alcohol 

22 treatment and rehabilitation program (as de23 fined in section 3(h) of the Food and Nutrition 

24 Act of 2008).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EX PARTE Robert LEVERT

1151338 (CR-15-0676)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 10, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF U.S. SHIPPING PARTNERS L.P.

|Name of Subsidiary             |  | State of Organization
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|U.S. Shipping Operating LLC    |  | Delaware             
|ITB Baltimore LLC              |  | Delaware             
|ITB Groton LLC                 |  | Delaware             
|ITB Jacksonville LLC           |  | Delaware             
|ITB Mobile LLC                 |  | Delaware             
|ITB New York LLC               |  | Delaware             
|ITB Philadelphia LLC           |  | Delaware             
|USCS ATB LLC                   |  | Delaware             
|USCS Chemical Pioneer Inc      |  | Delaware             
|USCS Chemical Chartering LLC   |  | Delaware             
|USCS Charleston Chartering LLC |  | Delaware             
|USCS Charleston LLC            |  | Delaware             
|USCS Sea Venture LLC           |  | Delaware             
|USS ATB 1 LLC                  |  | Delaware             
|USS ATB 2 LLC                  |  | Delaware             
|USS Chartering LLC             |  | Delaware             
|USS JV Manager, Inc.           |  | Delaware             
|USS M/V Houston LLC            |  | Delaware             
|USS PC Holding Corp.           |  | Delaware             
|USS Product Carriers LLC       |  | Delaware             
|USS Products Investor LLC      |  | Delaware             
|USS Product Manager LLC        |  | Delaware             
|U.S. Shipping Finance Corp.    |  | Delaware             

---



QuickLinks
#### Gloria Veraly Gonzalez De MORALES, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-74420.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 26, 2004.

*101Gloria Veraly Gonzalez De Morales, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri J. Scadron, Esq., Don G. Scroggin, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gloria Veraly Gonzalez de Morales (“Morales”), a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration’s (“BIA”) per curiam order adopting and affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (“U”) denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review a determination that an applicant has not established eligibility for asylum for substantial evidence, and where, as here, “the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision while adding its own reasons, we review both decisions.” *Kataria v. INS,*232 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir.2000).

Because the IJ did not make an explicit adverse credibility determination, we assume that Morales’ testimony was credible. *See Kataria,*232 F.3d at 1113-14. However, Morales’ testimony that Guatemalan guerrillas mistreated her in order to obtain food, money, and to recruit her to their ranks, does not compel a finding that she is eligible for asylum. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (stating that a petitioner must provide *“some*evidence” of her persecutors’ motives that would compel a reasonable fact-finder to find that she was persecuted *“because of...*political opinion”).

By failing to qualify for asylum, Morales necessarily fails to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003).

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*No. 03-70477, petitioner’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the motion for stay of removal was granted, or continued based on the government’s filing of a notice of non-opposition, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, *nunc pro**102*tunc,*to the filing of the motion for stay of removal, and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

Petitioner’s Motion to Remand, filed on April 7, 2004, is DENIED.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Restaurant Properties II
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                      |  |                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Kevin K. Moriarty                                              
|                      |  |                                                                    
|                      |  | Kevin K. Moriarty
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer   
|                      |  |                                                                    
|Date: August 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Robert J. Terrano                                              
|                      |  |                                                                    
|                      |  | Robert J. Terrano
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer