POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS AND MERCURY

EMISSION SUMMARY REPORT

EAF No. 12 SCRUBBER

EAF No. 1 MAIN BAGHOUSE

ERAMET MARIETTA, INC.

MARIETTA, OHIO

Prepared for:

Eramet Marietta, Inc.

P.O. Box 299

State Route 7 South

Marietta, Ohio 45750-0299

Prepared by:

Environmental Quality Management, Inc.

1800 Carillon Boulevard

Cincinnati, Ohio 45240

(513) 825-7500

Fax (513) 825-7495

www.eqm.com

EQ PN: 050352.0031

November 2014
ii

CONTENTS

Section Page

1. Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1-1

2. Summary of Test Results................................................................................................. 2-1

2.1 EAF No. 12 Scrubber.............................................................................................. 2-1

2.1.1 Stack Gas Conditions and Pollutant Emissions.......................................... 2-1

2.1.1.1 Mercury........................................................................................ 2-1

2.1.1.2 PAHs............................................................................................ 2-2

2.2 Furnace 1 Main Baghouse ...................................................................................... 2-4

2.2.1 Stack Gas Conditions and Pollutant Emissions.......................................... 2-5

2.2.1.1 Mercury........................................................................................ 2-5

2.2.1.2 PAHs............................................................................................ 2-5

3. Sampling and Analytical Procedures............................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Location of Measurement Sites .............................................................................. 3-1

3.2 Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate............................................................................ 3-1

3.3 Stack Gas Dry Molecular Weight........................................................................... 3-1

3.4 Stack Gas Moisture Content ................................................................................... 3-2

3.5 Mercury................................................................................................................... 3-2

3.6 PAHs....................................................................................................................... 3-3

4. Process Operation/Sampling Locations........................................................................... 4-1

5. Quality Assurance and Quality Control........................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Calibration Procedures and Frequency................................................................... 5-1

5.2 Field Blanks............................................................................................................ 5-1
iii

APPENDICES

Appendix A Calculations

Appendix B Field Data

Appendix C Analytical Data

Appendix D Process Data

Appendix E Quality Assurance and Quality Control

FIGURES

No. Page

Figure 3-1. EPA Method 30B.................................................................................................... 3-3

Figure 3-2. CARB Method 429 Sampling Train ....................................................................... 3-4

Figure 4-1. Sampling Locations ................................................................................................ 4-1

TABLES

No. Page

Table 1-1. General Scope Of Work.......................................................................................... 1-1

Table 2-1. Summary of Furnace Exhaust Conditions Furnace 12 Scrubber – Mercury .......... 2-2

Table 2-2. Summary of Furnace Exhaust Conditions Furnace 12 Scrubber – PAH................ 2-3

Table 2-3. Summary of Furnace Exhaust Conditions Furnace 1 Main Baghouse – Mercury . 2-5

Table 2-4. Summary of Furnace Exhaust Conditions Furnace 1 Main Baghouse – PAHs...... 2-6

Table 4-1. Sampling Location Parameters............................................................................... 4-2

Table 4-2. Furnace No. 12 Process Operations........................................................................ 4-2

Table 4-3. Furnace No. 1 Process Operations.......................................................................... 4-2

Table 5-1. Field Equipment Calibration Summary .................................................................. 5-2

Table 5-2. Field Checks of Sampling Equipment .................................................................... 5-2
1-1

1. INTRODUCTION

Eramet Marietta Inc. (EMI) conducted an emission measurement program to characterize 

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and mercury emissions from electric arc furnace 1 

(main baghouse outlet) during the production of ferromanganese (FeMn) and furnace 12 

(scrubber outlet) during the production of silicomanganese (SiMn). Emission measurements 

were collected October 15 and 16, 2014 at the Marietta, Ohio facility. 

The overall goal of the tests was to supplement data from previous tests and thereby gain 

a better understanding of the range and variability of actual emissions during production, using 

test measurement method 30B for Hg as specified by USEPA and method 429 for PAHs as 

specified in California Air Resources Board (CARB). The methodology follows a prior 

Information Collection Request (ICR) by USEPA.

 Environmental Quality Management, Inc. (EQ) was contracted by EMI to obtain the 

emission measurement data and coordinate the analysis and reporting of the results. A summary 

of the general scope of work as indicated is provided in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1. General Scope Of Work

Source

Sampling 

Location Target Analyte

USEPA Reference 

Method

EAF No. 12

Scrubber

Outlet PAHs CARB Method 429

Outlet Flow, O2/CO2 1, 2, 3

Outlet Moisture 4

Outlet Hg 30B

EAF No. 1

Main 

Baghouse

Outlet PAHs CARB Method 429

Outlet Flow, O2/CO2 1, 2, 3

Outlet Moisture 4

Outlet Hg 30B
2-1

2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

2.1 EAF No. 12 Scrubber

On October 16, 2014, the EAF No. 12 scrubber exhaust was sampled to determine the 

emission profile for Hg and PAHs. Furnace 12 is a continuous furnace that was operating in a 

double tap scenario where tapping occurred approximately every 80 minutes. Each test run 

encompassed approximately 70 minutes. Since this is a continuous furnace, raw material is 

added to the mix throughout the melting process and is tapped at the appropriate time. Each run 

incorporated a tap as well as the same amount melting time and raw material addition.

Furnace No. 12 scrubber was sampled at the outlet stack for all pollutants, flow, and 

O2/CO2 concentrations during the production of SiMn. The outlet sampling location was located 

in a circular duct downstream of the scrubber. 

2.1.1 Stack Gas Conditions and Pollutant Emissions

2.1.1.1 Mercury

Table 2-1 details the furnace exhaust conditions measured under each mercury (Hg) test 

run. Results are summarized for stack gas velocity (feet per second), volumetric flow rate 

(actual and dry standard cubic feet per minute), stack temperature, moisture, and composition 

(carbon dioxide and oxygen percentages). Stack gas conditions were consistent for each 

condition on a run-by-run basis. Paired mercury sorbent tubes were run, and the second tube was 

spiked for each run for QA analysis. Results for the unspiked tube are provided. The mercury 

results are reported in the following units: μg/dscm, lb/hr, and lb/ton of metal produced. 

Recovery efficiency for all runs met method QA requirements.
2-2

Table 2-1. Summary of Furnace Exhaust Conditions

Furnace 12 Scrubber – Mercury

Date: October 16, 2014 Eramet – Marietta, Ohio

Run No.

FCE12-US-1 FCE12-US-2 FCE12-US-3 FCE12-US-4 Average

Date Oct. 16, 2014 Oct. 16, 2014 Oct. 16, 2014 Oct. 16, 2014

Time 1010-1120 1158-1308 1341-1451 1510-1620

Stack Gas Velocity, fpsa59 60 59 59 56

Volumetric Flow Rate, acfmb175,370 177,425 174,399 174,156 175,731

Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfmc142,579 144,279 143,841 142,969 143,566

Temperature, °F 127 128 127 130 128

Moisture, % 6.8 6.7 5.5 5.5 6.3

CO2, % 0 0 0 0 0

O2, % 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8

Mercury

μg/dscm

lbs/hr

lbs/ton Metal

10.11

5.78E-03

6.09E-04

10.27

5.94E-03

6.25E-04

9.05

5.15E-03

5.42E-04

9.58

5.42E-03

5.70E-04

9.75

5.57E-03

5.87E-04

a

Feet per second.

bActual cubic feet per minute.

cDry standard cubic feet per minute.

.

2.1.1.2 PAHs

Table 2-2 details the furnace exhaust conditions measured under each CARB 

Method 429 for PAHs. Results are summarized for stack gas velocity (feet per second), 

volumetric flow rate (actual and dry standard cubic feet per minute), stack temperature, moisture, 

and composition (carbon dioxide and oxygen percentages). Stack gas conditions were consistent 

for each condition on a run-by-run basis. Gas composition for O2 and CO2 were analyzed during 

each run via Method 3A. The results are reported in: ng/dscm, lb/hr and lb/ton of metal 

produced. 
2-3

Table 2-2. Summary of Furnace Exhaust Conditions

Furnace 12 Scrubber – PAHs

Date: October 16, 2016 Eramet – Marietta, Ohio

Site/Run No.

12-429-1 12-429-2 12-429-3 12-429-4 Average

Date Oct. 16, 2014 Oct. 16, 2014 Oct. 16, 2014 Oct. 16, 2014

Time 1010-1123 1157-1311 1332-1445 1509-1622

Stack Gas Velocity, fpsa58.9 59.7 58.6 58.7 58.97

Volumetric Flow Rate, acfmb175,354 177,474 174,420 174,697 175,486

Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfmc142,702 144,255 143,914 141,110 142,995

Temperature, °F 127 128 127 130 128

Moisture, % 6.7 6.7 5.5 7.0 6.49

CO2, % 0 0 0 0 0

O2, % 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5

Naphthalene

ng/dscmd 2.14E+04 1.69E+04 2.28E+-04 2.26E+-4 2.09E+04

1 – Methylnaphthalene 

ng/dscm 4.92E+-3 8.68E+03 6.82E+-3 6.03E+03 6.61E+03

2 – Methylnaphthalene 

ng/dscm 7.22E+03 1.16E+04 9.45E+-3 8.45+03 9.18E+03

Acenaphthylene

ng/dscm 7.58E+03 3.06E+03 7.75E+03 9.84E+03 7.06E+03

Acenaphthene

ng/dscm 9.11E+02 1.35E+03 1.20E+03 1.06E+03 1.13E+03

Fluorene

ng/dscm 1.40E+03 1.98E+03 1.81E+03 1.59E+03 1.69E+03

Phenanthrene

ng/dscm 1.86E+04 1.85E+04 3.82E+04 2.24E+04 2.44E+04

Anthracene

ng/dscm 4.41E+03 3.01E+03 6.82+03 5.41E+03 4.91E+03

Fluoranthene

ng/dscm 1.88E+04 9.85E+03 3.33E+04 1.57E+04 1.94E+04

Pyrene

ng/dscm 1.37E+04 6.63E+03 2.42E+04 1.19E+04 1.41E+04

Benzo (a) Anthracene

ng/dscm 1.81E+03 2.79E+03 1.81E+03 1.69E+03 2.03E+03

Chrysene

ng/dscm 7.07E+03 8.33E+03 5.47E+03 2.68+03 5.89E+03

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene

ng/dscm 2.65E+03 4.41E+03 2.61E+03 1.63E+03 2.83E+03

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene

ng/dscm 9.98E+02 2.19E+03 9.71E+02 6.44E+02 1.20E+03

Benzo (e) Pyrene 

ng/dscm 1.30E+03 2.31E+03 1.11E+03 8.55E+02 1.39E+03
2-4

Table 2-2. (continued)

Site/Run No. Average

12-429-1 12-429-2 12-429-3 12-429-4

Benzo (a) Pyrene 

ng/dscm 4.25E+02 3.81E+02 2.63E+02 3.51E+02 3.55E+02

Perylene

ng/dscm 5.48E+01 7.33E+01 3.12E+01 6.85E+01 5.69E+01

Indeno (1, 2, 3 – cd) Pyrene

ng/dscm 5.43E+02 9.76E+02 3.36E+02 5.05E+02 5.90E+02

Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene

ng/dscm 1.06E+02 2.70E+02 6.66E+01 1.05E+02 1.37E+02

Benzo (ghi) Perylene

ng/dscm 4.20E+02 6.27E+02 2.73E+02 4.16E+02 4.34E+02

Total PAHs

ng/dscm

lbs/hr

lbs/ton Metal

1.14E+05

6.11E-02

0.01

1.04E+05

5.61E-02

0.01

1.65E+05

8.90E-02

0.01

1.14E+05

6.01E-02

0.01

1.24E+05

6.66E-02

0.01

19-PAHd

ng/dscm

lbs/hr

lbs/ton Metal

1.09E+05

5.84E-02

0.01

9.52E+04

5.14E-02

0.01

1.59E+05

8.54E-02

0.01

1.08E+05

5.70E-02

0.01

1.18E+05

6.30E-02

0.01

a

Feet per second.

b Actual cubic feet per minute.

c Dry standard cubic feet per minute.

d

19-PAH Excludes 1-Methylnaphthalene

2.2 Furnace 1 Main Baghouse

On October 15, 2014, the Main Baghouse (MB1) controlling emissions from the No. 1 

EAF was sampled while producing FeMn to determine the emission profile for PAHs and Hg. 

Furnace 1 is a continuous furnace that was operating in a double tap scenario where tapping 

occurred approximately every 120 minutes. Each test run encompassed a 90 minute period. 

Since this is a continuous furnace, raw material is added to the mix throughout the melting 

process and is tapped at the appropriate time. Each run incorporated a tap as well as the same 

amount of time of melting and raw material addition.

The Furnace 1 MB was sampled at the outlet stack for all pollutants, flow, and O2/CO2 

concentrations. The outlet sampling location was located in a circular duct downstream of the 

baghouse. Data was not corrected for detected blank amounts. The blank detected quantity was 

well below the analytical result.
2-5

2.2.1 Stack Gas Conditions and Pollutant Emissions

2.2.1.1 Mercury

Table 2-3 details the furnace exhaust conditions measured under each mercury (Hg) test 

run. Results are summarized for stack gas velocity (feet per second), volumetric flow rate 

(actual and dry standard cubic feet per minute), stack temperature, moisture, and composition 

(carbon dioxide and oxygen percentages). Stack gas conditions were consistent for each 

condition on a run-by-run basis. Paired mercury sorbent tubes were run, and the second tube was 

spiked for each run for QA analysis. Results for the unspiked tube are provided. All runs met 

the recovery efficiency QA requirements.

Table 2-3. Summary of Furnace Exhaust Conditions

Furnace 1 Main Baghouse – Mercury

Date: October 15, 2014 Eramet – Marietta, Ohio

Run No.

MB-US-1 MB-US-2 MB-US-3 MB-US-4 Average

Date Oct.15, 2014 Oct.15, 2014 Oct.15, 2014 Oct.15, 2014

Time 0820-0950 1020-1150 1220-1350 1420-1550

Stack Gas Velocity, fpsa49.5 48.3 46.9 48.4 48.356

Volumetric Flow Rate, acfmb233,394 227,807 221,163 227,892 227,455

Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfmc185,008 172,103 166,240 177,086 174,450

Temperature, °F 170.8 200.5 206.6 184.8 191

Moisture, % 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.5

CO2, % 0 0 0 0 0

O2, % 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8

Mercury

μg/dscm

lbs/hr

lbs/ton Metal

92.75

6.58E-02

6.04E-03

135.41

8.95E-02

8.21E-03

105.70

6.72E-02

6.17E-03

69.38

4.70E-02

4.31.03

100.81

6.74E-02

6.18-03

a

Feet per second.

b Actual cubic feet per minute.

c Dry standard cubic feet per minute.

d Run 2 did not meet the method QA requirements and is not included in the average.

2.2.1.2 PAHs

Table 2-4 details the furnace exhaust conditions measured under each CARB Method 429 

for PAHs. Results are summarized for stack gas velocity (feet per second), volumetric flow rate 
2-6

(actual and dry standard cubic feet per minute), stack temperature, moisture, and composition 

(carbon dioxide and oxygen percentages). Stack gas conditions were consistent for each 

condition on a run-by-run basis. Gas composition for O2 and CO2 were analyzed during each run 

via Method 3A. The results are reported in the units specified in: ng/dscm, lb/hr and lb/ton of 

metal produced. All test runs met the minimum sample volume requirement of 1 m

3

.

Table 2-4. Summary of Furnace Exhaust Conditions

Furnace 1 Main Baghouse – PAHs

Date: October 15, 2014 Eramet – Marietta, Ohio

Site/Run No.

MB-429-1 MB-429-2 MB-429-3 MB-429-4 Average

Date Oct. 15, 2014 Oct. 15, 2014 Oct. 15, 2014 Oct. 15, 2014

Time 0820-0954 1020-1155 1220-1355 1420-1553

Stack Gas Velocity, fpsa48.8 47.6 46.2 47.6 47.5

Volumetric Flow Rate, acfmb229,839 224,327 217,779 224,270 224,054

Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfmc187,907 174,827 168,899 180,391 178,006

Temperature, °F 171 201 207 185 191

Moisture, % 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.4

CO2, % 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

O2, % 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5

Naphthalene

ng/dscmd 2.78E+05 3.00E+05 2.30E+05 2.29E+05 2.59E+05

1 – Methylnaphthalene 

ng/dscm 3.26E+04 4.89E+04 2.89E+04 3.29E+04 3.58E+04

2 – Methylnaphthalene 

ng/dscm 4.42E+04 6.74E+04 3.78E+04 4.69E+04 4.91E+04

Acenaphthylene

ng/dscm 9.04E+04 1.23E+05 5.28E+04 8.50E+04 8.78E+04

Acenaphthene

ng/dscm 1.89E+04 2.84E+04 1.37E+04 1.38E+04 1.87E+04

Fluorene

ng/dscm 4.15E+04 7.92E+04 2.92E+04 4.62+04 4.90E+04

Phenanthrene

ng/dscm 1.19E+06 1.04E+06 1.12E+06 9.03E+05 1.06E+06

Anthracene

ng/dscm 2.03E+05 1.33E+05 1.47E+05 1.10E+05 1.48E+05

Fluoranthene

ng/dscm 2.14E+06 3.13E+06 2.89E+06 1.36E+06 2.38E+06

Pyrene

ng/dscm 1.54E+06 2.32E+06 2.11E+06 9.42E+05 1.73E+06

Benzo (a) Anthracene

ng/dscm 1.58E+05 3.73E+05 4.98E+05 1.17E+05 2.86E+05

Chrysene

ng/dscm 2.79E+05 8.18E+05 1.04E+06 3.04E+05 6.11E+05

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene

ng/dscm 8.33E+04 2.74E+05 4.33E+05 1.17E+05 2.27E+05

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene

ng/dscm 2.43E+04 7.33E+04 1.46E+05 3.91E+04 7.06E+04
2-7

Site/Run No.

MB-429-1 MB-429-2 MB-429-3 MB-429-4 Average

Benzo (e) Pyrene 

ng/dscm 3.07E+04 9.75E+04 164E+05 4.94E+04 8.54E+04

Benzo (a) Pyrene 

ng/dscm 1.34E+04 3.95E+04 8.52E+04 1.98E+04 3.95E+04

Perylene

ng/dscm 2.41E+03 5.76E+03 145E+04 4.10E+03 6.69E+03

Indeno (1, 2, 3 – cd) Pyrene

ng/dscm 4.95E+03 1.50E+04 2.84E+04 7.38E+03 1.39E+04

Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene

ng/dscm 7.03E+02 2.70E+03 4.15E+03 1.30E+03 2.21E+03

Benzo (ghi) Perylene

ng/dscm 4.33E+03 1.16E+04 1.94E+04 5.54E+03 1.02E+04

Total PAHs

ng/dscm

lbs/hr

lbs/ton Metal

6.18E+06

4.35

0.40

8.99E+06

5.88

0.54

9.09E+06

5.74

0.53

4.44E+06

3.00

0.27

7.17E+06

4.74

0.44

19-PAHd

ng/dscm

lbs/hr

lbs/ton Metal

6.15E+06

4.32

0.40

8.94E+06

5.85

0.54

9.06E+06

5.73

0.53

4.40E+06

2.97

0.27

7.14E+06

4.72

0.43

a

Feet per second.

b Actual cubic feet per minute.

c Dry standard cubic feet per minute.

d

19-PAH Excludes 1-Methylnaphthalene
3-1

3. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

The sampling and analytical procedures used in this test program conformed to the prior

USEPA ICR, the test protocol and the EPA Reference Methods as published in the Federal 

Register. A brief description of each method follows.

3.1 Location of Measurement Sites

EPA Method 1, “Sample Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources,” was used to select 

representative measurement sites at each sampling location. The sampling locations are 

described in Section 4.

3.2 Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate

EPA Method 2, “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rates,” was 

used at each location to determine stack gas volumetric flow rates. Type “S” pitot tubes meeting 

the EPA specifications and an inclined manometer were used to measure velocity pressures. A 

calibrated Type “K” thermocouple attached directly to the pitot tube was used to measure stack 

gas temperature. The stack gas velocity was calculated from the average square root of the stack 

gas velocity pressure, average stack gas temperature, stack gas molecular weight, and absolute 

static pressure. The volumetric flow rate is the product of velocity and stack cross-sectional 

area.

3.3 Stack Gas Dry Molecular Weight

EPA Reference Method 3, “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide 

Concentrations in Emissions was used to determine oxygen and carbon dioxide content of the 

stack gas. Integrated tedlar bag samples were collected at each exhaust during each test run and 

analyzed with the Fyrite analyzer.
3-2

3.4 Stack Gas Moisture Content

EPA Reference Method 4, “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases,” was 

used to determine stack gas moisture content. This method was conducted in conjunction with 

each Carb 429 sampling run. The initial and final contents of all impingers were measured

gravimetrically.

3.5 Mercury

Mercury concentrations and emissions were sampled and analyzed for following Method 

30B, “Determination of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions From Coal-Fired Combustion 

Sources Using Carbon Sorbent Traps.” This method is designed to measure the mass 

concentration of total vapor phase Hg in flue gas, including elemental Hg (Hgo) and oxidized 

forms of Hg (Hg+2), in micrograms per dry standard cubic meter. The sampling system used 

two paired sorbent tubes; one tube was spiked (3,800 nanograms for FCE 1 and 1,000 ng for 

FCE 12) to determine recovery efficiencies. Each pair of tubes was sampled simultaneously, 

with a similar sample target flow rate, at approximately 1 liter per minute. Leak checks were 

performed before and after each sampling run. After each sampling run, the sorbent traps were 

properly labeled, sealed in plastic tubes, and prepared for shipment to the lab. Cold Vapor 

Atomic Absorption (CVAA) was used to perform sample analyses. Figure 3-1 is a schematic of 

the sampling system.
3-3

Figure 3-1. EPA Method 30B 

3.6 PAHs

California Air Resources Board (CARB) Method 429, “Determination of Polycyclic 

Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Emissions from Stationary Sources, was used to measure PAHs 

from the scrubber and baghouse exhausts. The particulate and gaseous phase PAH are extracted 

isokinetically from the stack and collected on the XAD-2 resin in impingers or in upstream 

sampling train components (filter, probe, nozzle). Only the total amounts of each PAH in the 

stack emissions can be determined with this method. The analytical method is isotope dilution 

mass spectrometry combined with high resolution gas chromatography (HRGC). Selected 

targets from selected samples have been reported from the analysis of diluted extracts that have 

been re-spiked with quantification standard. As a result, these data are not calculated by isotope 

dilution and are not inherently recovery-corrected. Reported extraction standard recoveries for 

these targets are not indicative of extraction efficiency as they have been spiked after extraction. 

This modification was submitted to USEPA in the test protocol and approved via email. Figure 

3-2 is a schematic of the sampling system.
3-4

Figure 3-2. CARB Method 429 Sampling Train
4-1

4. PROCESS OPERATION/SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Eramet Marietta, Inc., operates a facility in Marietta, Ohio. The No. 12 Furnace and No. 

1 Furnace were tested at the facility as part of this test program. The No. 12 Furnace, a 

submerged arc continuous furnace, is rated at 22 MW and utilizes two wet scrubbers to control 

primary and secondary emissions. The scrubbers operate simultaneously and exhaust through a 

single stack. The No. 1 Furnace, a continuous electric arc continuous furnace, is rated at 31 MW 

and a maximum production rate of 35 tons per hour. 

The Electrode consumption rate and Safety Data Sheet (SDS) are provided in Appendix 

D. The raw material feed to each furnace is also provided in Appendix D.

Table 4-1 presents a summary of the sampling site location. Figure 4-1 is a general 

schematic of the testing locations.

Table 4-2 presents Furnace No. 12 process operations, and Table 4-3 presents Furnace 

No. 1 process operations. 

B

A

C

Direction of

Flow

Figure 4-1. Sampling Locations
4-2

Table 4-1. Sampling Location Parameters

Stack Identification

Stack I.D.,

Inches

(C)

Distance from Nearest Disturbance

No. of Sampling 

Points Required,

Total

Upstream,

Inches

(A)

Downstream,

Inches

(B)

Furnace No. 12

Scrubber 95.35” >194.0 368.0 24

Furnace No. 1

Main Baghouse 120” 480.0” 480.0” 24

Table 4-2. Furnace No. 12 and Process Operations

Date: October 16, 2014 Plant: Eramet - Marietta, Ohio

Run No. Time

Process Throughput, tons/hr at 

furnace load (MW)

Pressure Drop, 

inches of water

12-1 1010-1123 9.5 at 19.55 MW 53.8 east 53.4 west

12-2 1157-1311 9.5 at 19.02 MW 53.8 east 53.4 west

12-3 1332-1445 9.5 at 18.82 MW 53.8 east 53.3 west

12-4 1509-1622 9.5 at 19.17 MW 53.7 east 53.2 west

Average 9.5 at 19.14 MW 53.8 east 53.3 west

Table 4-3. Furnace No. 1 Process Operations

Date: October 15, 2014 Plant: Eramet – Marietta, Ohio

Run No. Time

Process Throughput,

tons/hr at furnace 

load (MW)

Pressure Drop, inches of water

Compartments

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Furnace No. 1 Main Baghouse

MB-5-1 0820-0950 10.9 at 24.85 MW 10.58 6.42 6.58 6.27 8.17 6.44 6.43 9.12

MB-5-2 1020-1150 10.9 at 26.13 MW 10.27 6.85 6.42 6.38 8.17 6.58 6.61 8.99

MB-5-3 1220-1350 10.9 at 25.88 MW 10.59 6.38 6.75 6.29 8.54 6.54 6.86 9.04

MB-5-3 1420-1550 10.9 at 24.11MW 10.26 6.78 6.24 6.59 8.06 6.53 6.48 8.46

Average 10.9 at 25.24MW 10.43 6.61 6.50 6.38 8.26 6.53 6.60 8.90
5-1

5. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL

The field sampling quality assurance for this project included the use of calibrated source 

sampling equipment, reference test methods, and traceability protocols for recording and 

calculating data. The analytical quality assurance included use of validated analytical 

procedures, calibration of analytical instruments, and analysis of control samples and blanks. 

The calibration and quality control procedures used for this test program are described in the 

following subsection.

5.1 Calibration Procedures and Frequency

All manual stack gas sampling equipment was calibrated before the test program in 

accordance with the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution 

Measurement Systems, Volume 111, EPA-600/4-72-027B. Summarized in Table 5-1 are the 

stack gas sampling equipment calibrations that were performed in preparation for this project. 

The meter box was re-calibrated after the test.

Tables 5-2 and 5-3 list the additional calibration checks that were performed on the 

sampling equipment on site, just prior to the testing, to ensure that equipment was not damaged 

during transport. Analyzer checks are conducted directly to the instrument initially and then 

through the sampling system. 

5.2 Field Blanks

A field blank of the PAH sampling train was collected. After sample collection and 

recovery, the sampling train was assembled, leak checked, recovered, and submitted to the 

laboratory for analysis. The field blank results were subtracted from the sample analyte results 

where applicable. Reagent and media blanks were also submitted for analysis.
5-2

Table 5-1. Field Equipment Calibration Summary a

Equipment Calibrated Against Allowable Error

Method 5 meter box Reference test meter Y  0.02 Y

∆H @  0.15

post-test

Y  0.05

Orsat Certified cylinder gas  0.5%

Pitot tube Geometric specifications See EPA Method 2

Thermocouple ASTM-3F thermometer 1.5%

Impinger (or condenser 

thermometer)

ASTM-3F  2° F

Dry gas thermometer ASTM-3F  5° F

Probe nozzles Caliper  0.004 in.

Barometer NBS traceable barometer  0.1 in. Hg

a As recommended in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III. Stationary SourceSpecific Methods. EPA-600/4-77-027b, August 1997.

Table 5-2. Field Checks of Sampling Equipment

Equipment Checked Against Allowable Differences

Pitot tube Inspection No visible damage

Thermocouples ASTM 2F or 3F  1.5%

Probe Nozzles Caliper  0.004 in.
APPENDIX A

CALCULATIONS
NOMENCLATURE

1-Bws Dry Mole Fraction

A Cross-sectional area of stack, ft2

acfm Actual Cubic Feet Per Minute

An Cross-sectional area of sampling nozzle, ft2

As Cross-sectional area of stack, in2

Bws Moisture, % by volume

Bws(sat) Moisture (at saturation), % by volume

CO2 Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume

Cmetals Metals concentration, μg/dscm

Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient

Cpm Particulate matter concentration, grains/dscf

Cpmlb Particulate matter concentration, lb/dscf

dscf Dry standard cubic feet

dscfm Dry Standard Cubic Feet Per Minute

dscmm Dry standard cubic meter per minute

DH Avg Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H2O

Dn Nozzle Diameter, inches

Dp1/2 Average Square Root Dp, (in. H2O)1/2

Emetals Metals mass emission rate, lb/hr

Epm Particulate mass emission rate, lb/hr

I Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %

La Maximum acceptable leakage check rate; equal to 0.020 ft3/min 

or 4% of the average sampling rate, whichever is less

Mcatch Metal sample collected, μg

Md Molecular Weight (d.b.), lb/lb•mole

Ms Molecular Weight (w.b.), lb/lb•mole

N2 Nitrogen content, % by volume

O2 Oxygen content, % by volume

Pbar Barometric Pressure, inches Hg

Ps Absolute Stack Pressure, inches Hg

Pstatic Stack Static Pressure, inches H2O
PM Particulate matter collected during the test, mg

Q Sample Run Duration, minutes

Qa Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm

Qm Average Sampling Rate, dscfm

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm

Qsm Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm

Tm Average Meter Temperature, °F

Ts Average Stack Temperature, °F

Vlc

Volume of Condensate Collected in Impingers and Silica Gel, 

ml

Vm Sample Volume, ft3

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, ft3

Vs Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s

Vwstd Standard Water Vapor Volume, ft3

y Meter Box Correction Factor
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS

1. Volume of dry gas sampled corrected to standard conditions, ft3. 

 Note: Vm must be corrected for leakage if any leakage rates exceed La.

Vmstd xVmxY

Pbar

H

TM R



























17 647 136.

.

,



2. Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, ft3.

Vwstd = 0.04707 x Vlc

3. Moisture content in stack gas, dimensionless.

Bws

Vwstd

Vwstd Vmstd





4. Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole.

Md = 0.44 (% CO2) + 0.32 (% O2) + 0.28 (% N2 + % CO)

5. Molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole.

Ms = Md(1-Bws) + 18Bws

6. Stack velocity at stack conditions, f/s.

 

  

Vs = (85.49) (Cp) avg P

Ts R

Ps Ms



,

)



7. Stack gas volumetric flow rate at stack conditions, cfm.

Qs = 60 x Vs x As

8. Dry stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, cfm.

Qsstd = (17.647) (Qs) 

Ps

Ts

Bws 









 (1 )
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (CONTINUED)

9. Concentration in gr/dscf.

Cs  

Mn

Vmstd













0.01543 

10. Pollutant mass emission rate, lb/h.

pmr lb hr

Cs

, /  xQsstd x













7000

60

11. Pollutant mass emission rate, lb/MM Btu.

pmr lb MM Btu

pmr lb hr

MM Btu hr

, /

,















12. F-factor (Fd).

         

 

Fd

x H x C x S x N x

GCV Btu lb



10 364  153  057  014  0 46 6. % . % . % . % . %02

13. F-factor, pollutant mass emission rate, lb/MM Btu (O2-based).

 





lb dscf xFx

O

/ .

. %

20 9

20 9 2

14. Heat input, MM Btu/hr fuel.

   



GVC Btu / lb *FeedRate lb / hr

106

15. Heat input, MM Btu/hr, F-factor.

     

Qsstd

Fd

x 20.9 %O2 20.9 x60
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR GASEOUS POLLUTANTS 

MEASURED BY CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORS (CEMS)

1) Concentrations, parts per million, dry basis:

ppm dry ppm wet basis

BWS

, ,

,%

  











1 

100

2) Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, pounds per hour.

PMR, lb/hr = 

 x dscfm x 60

385.3ft /mol

ppm,dry x CompoundMolecular Weight

3

Molecular Weights of Target Compounds

TGO = Total Gaseous Organics 16.01 (Methane); 44.01 (Propane)

SO2 = Sulfur Dioxide 64.05

NO2 = Nitrogen Oxides 46.00

CO = Carbon Monoxide 28.01

HCL = Hydrogen Chloride 36.47

HF = Hydrogen Fluoride 20.01

BWS = Proportion by Volume of Water Vapor in the Gas Stream

PMR = Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, pounds per hour

DSCFM = Dry standard cubic feet per minute

SCF/mol = 385.3
RUN NUMBER 12-429-1 12-429-2 12-429-3 12-429-4

RUN DATE 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 Average

RUN TIME 1010-1123 1157-1311 1332-1445 1509-1622

MEASURED DATA

g Meter Box Correction Factor 0.941 0.941 0.941 0.941 0.941

H Avg Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H2O 3.09 1.17 3.12 3.07 2.613

Pbar Barometric Pressure, inches Hg 29.07 29.07 29.07 29.07 29.07

Vm Sample Volume, ft376.102 47.094 76.503 76.467 69.042

Tm Average Meter Temperature, °F 7 7 7 8 8 4 8 2 8 0

Pstatic Stack Static Pressure, inches H2O -0.35 -0.37 -0.35 -0.38 -0.36

Ts Average Stack Temperature, °F 127 128 127 130 128

Vl c Condensate Collected, ml 106.0 65.0 84.0 110.0 91.3

C O2 Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

O2 Oxygen content, % by volume 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5

N2 Nitrogen content, % by volume 79.5 79.5 79.5 79.5 79.5

Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

p

1/2 Average Square Root Dp, (in. H2O)1/2 0.9675 0.9786 0.9648 0.9612 0.9680

Circular Stack? 1=Y,0=N: 1 1 1 1 1.00

As Diameter or Dimensions, inches: 95.35 95.35 95.35 95.35 95.35

Q Sample Run Duration, minutes 7 2 7 2 7 2 7 2 7 2

Dn Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.250 0.195 0.250 0.250 0.236

CALCULATED DATA

An Nozzle Area, ft20.00034 0.00021 0.00034 0.00034 0.00031

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, dscf 68.971 42.327 68.374 68.553 62.056

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, dscm 1.953 1.199 1.936 1.941 1.757

Ps Stack Pressure, inches Hg 29.04 29.04 29.04 29.04 29.04

Bws Moisture, % by volume 6.7 6.7 5.5 7.0 6.49

Bws(sat) Moisture (at saturation), % by volume 14.4 14.6 14.3 15.4 14.67

Vwstd Standard Water Vapor Volume, ft34.989 3.060 3.954 5.178 4.30

1-Bws Dry Mole Fraction 0.933 0.933 0.945 0.930 0.94

Md Molecular Weight (d.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.82 28.82 28.82 28.82 28.82

Ms Molecular Weight (w.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.09 28.09 28.23 28.06 28.12

Vs Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s 58.9 59.7 58.6 58.7 58.98

A Stack Area, ft2 49.59 49.59 49.59 49.59 49.59

Qa Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm 175,354 177,474 174,420 174,697 175486

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm 142,702 144,255 143,914 141,110 142995

Qs(cmm) Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm 4,040.9 4,084.9 4,075.2 3,995.8 4049.2

I Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, % 97.7 97.5 96.0 98.2 97.3

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #12 Scrubber

Page 1 of 6
RUN NUMBER 12-429-1 12-429-2 12-429-3 12-429-4

RUN DATE 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 Average

RUN TIME 1010-1123 1157-1311 1332-1445 1509-1622

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH:

Naphthalene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 41700.0 20200.0 44100.0 43900.0 37475.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 2.14E+04 1.69E+04 2.28E+04 2.26E+04 2.09E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 5.18E+06 4.13E+06 5.57E+06 5.42E+06 5.07E+06

1 - Methylnaphthalene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 9600.0 10400.0 13200.0 11700.0 11225.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 4.92E+03 8.68E+03 6.82E+03 6.03E+03 6.61E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.19E+06 2.13E+06 1.67E+06 1.44E+06 1.61E+06

2 - Methylnaphthalene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 14100.0 13900.0 18300.0 16400.0 15675.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 7.22E+03 1.16E+04 9.45E+03 8.45E+03 9.18E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.75E+06 2.84E+06 2.31E+06 2.03E+06 2.23E+06

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #12 Scrubber

Page 2 of 6
RUN NUMBER 12-429-1 12-429-2 12-429-3 12-429-4

RUN DATE 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 Average

RUN TIME 1010-1123 1157-1311 1332-1445 1509-1622

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH's:

Acenaphthylene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 14800.0 3670.0 15000.0 19100.0 13142.50

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 7.58E+03 3.06E+03 7.75E+03 9.84E+03 7.06E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.84E+06 7.50E+05 1.89E+06 2.36E+06 1.71E+06

Acenaphthene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 1780.0 1620.0 2330.0 2050.0 1945.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 9.11E+02 1.35E+03 1.20E+03 1.06E+03 1.13E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 2.21E+05 3.31E+05 2.94E+05 2.53E+05 2.75E+05

Fluorene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 2740.0 2370.0 3500.0 3080.0 2922.50

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.40E+03 1.98E+03 1.81E+03 1.59E+03 1.69E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 3.40E+05 4.85E+05 4.42E+05 3.80E+05 4.12E+05

Phenanthrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 36400.0 22200.0 74000.0 43500.0 44025.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.86E+04 1.85E+04 3.82E+04 2.24E+04 2.44E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 4.52E+06 4.54E+06 9.35E+06 5.37E+06 5.94E+06

Anthracene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 8620.0 3610.0 13200.0 10500.0 8982.50

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 4.41E+03 3.01E+03 6.82E+03 5.41E+03 4.91E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.07E+06 7.38E+05 1.67E+06 1.30E+06 1.19E+06

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #12 Scrubber

Page 3 of 6
RUN NUMBER 12-429-1 12-429-2 12-429-3 12-429-4

RUN DATE 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 Average

RUN TIME 1010-1123 1157-1311 1332-1445 1509-1622

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH's:

Fluoranthene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 36800.0 11800.0 64500.0 30400.0 35875.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.88E+04 9.85E+03 3.33E+04 1.57E+04 1.94E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 4.57E+06 2.41E+06 8.15E+06 3.75E+06 4.72E+06

Pyrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 26800.0 7950.0 46900.0 23100.0 26187.50

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.37E+04 6.63E+03 2.42E+04 1.19E+04 1.41E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 3.33E+06 1.63E+06 5.92E+06 2.85E+06 3.43E+06

Benzo (a) Anthracene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 3530.0 3350.0 3510.0 3290.0 3420.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.81E+03 2.79E+03 1.81E+03 1.69E+03 2.03E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 4.38E+05 6.85E+05 4.43E+05 4.06E+05 4.93E+05

Chrysene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 13800.0 9990.0 10600.0 5200.0 9897.50

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 7.07E+03 8.33E+03 5.47E+03 2.68E+03 5.89E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.71E+06 2.04E+06 1.34E+06 6.42E+05 1.43E+06

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 5170.0 5290.0 5060.0 3160.0 4670.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 2.65E+03 4.41E+03 2.61E+03 1.63E+03 2.83E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 6.42E+05 1.08E+06 6.39E+05 3.90E+05 6.88E+05

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #12 Scrubber

Page 4 of 6
RUN NUMBER 12-429-1 12-429-2 12-429-3 12-429-4

RUN DATE 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 Average

RUN TIME 1010-1123 1157-1311 1332-1445 1509-1622

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH's:

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 1950.0 2630.0 1880.0 1250.0 1927.50

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 9.98E+02 2.19E+03 9.71E+02 6.44E+02 1.20E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 2.42E+05 5.38E+05 2.37E+05 1.54E+05 2.93E+05

Benzo (e) Pyrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 2540.0 2770.0 2150.0 1660.0 2280.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.30E+03 2.31E+03 1.11E+03 8.55E+02 1.39E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 3.15E+05 5.66E+05 2.72E+05 2.05E+05 3.40E+05

Benzo (a) Pyrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 831.0 457.0 510.0 681.0 619.75

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 4.25E+02 3.81E+02 2.63E+02 3.51E+02 3.55E+02

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.03E+05 9.35E+04 6.44E+04 8.41E+04 8.63E+04

Perylene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 107.0 87.8 60.4 133.0 97.05

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 5.48E+01 7.33E+01 3.12E+01 6.85E+01 5.69E+01

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.33E+04 1.80E+04 7.63E+03 1.64E+04 1.38E+04

Indeno (1, 2, 3 - cd) Pyrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 1060.0 1170.0 651.0 980.0 965.25

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 5.43E+02 9.76E+02 3.36E+02 5.05E+02 5.90E+02

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.32E+05 2.39E+05 8.22E+04 1.21E+05 1.44E+05

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #12 Scrubber

Page 5 of 6
RUN NUMBER 12-429-1 12-429-2 12-429-3 12-429-4

RUN DATE 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 Average

RUN TIME 1010-1123 1157-1311 1332-1445 1509-1622

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH's:

Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 207.0 324.0 129.0 204.0 216.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.06E+02 2.70E+02 6.66E+01 1.05E+02 1.37E+02

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 2.57E+04 6.63E+04 1.63E+04 2.52E+04 3.34E+04

Benzo (ghi) Perylene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 821.0 751.0 528.0 807.0 726.75

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 4.20E+02 6.27E+02 2.73E+02 4.16E+02 4.34E+02

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.02E+05 1.54E+05 6.67E+04 9.97E+04 1.05E+05

Total PAH ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 223356.0 124539.8 320108.4 221095.0 222274.80

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.14E+05 1.04E+05 1.65E+05 1.14E+05 1.24E+05

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 2.77E+07 2.55E+07 4.04E+07 2.73E+07 3.02E+07

Total PAH lbs/hr 6.11E-02 5.61E-02 8.90E-02 6.01E-02 6.66E-02

Production rate, tph 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.50

Emission rate, lbs/ton 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Furnace #12 Scrubber

Page 6 of 6

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH 19-PAH

(ng) Catch, ng 213756.00 114139.80 306908.40 209395.00 211049.80

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.09E+05 9.52E+04 1.59E+05 1.08E+05 1.18E+05

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 2.65E+07 2.33E+07 3.88E+07 2.59E+07 2.86E+07

Total 19-PAH lbs/hr 5.84E-02 5.14E-02 8.54E-02 5.70E-02 6.30E-02

Production rate, tph 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.50

Emission rate, lbs/ton 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

050352.0031

Eramet - Marietta, OH

EPA Method 30B-Mercury - Spiked

Furnace #12 Scrubber

Page 1 of 2

RUN NUMBER FC12-S-1 FC12-S-2 FC12-S-3 FC12-S-4

RUN DATE 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 Average

RUN TIME 1456-1704 1158-1308 1341-1451 1510-1620

MEASURED DATA

Pstatic Stack Static Pressure, inches H2O -0.47 -0.37 -0.35 -0.38 -0.39

y Meter Box Correction Factor 0.9966 0.9966 0.9966 0.9966 1.00

Pbar Barometric Pressure, inches Hg 29.065 29.065 29.065 29.065 29.065

Vm Sample Volume, L363.740 75.276 70.634 63.781 68.36

Dp1/2 Average Square Root Dp, (in. H2O)1/2 0.9675 0.9786 0.9648 0.9612 0.97

Tm Average Meter Temperature, °F 75.13 81.13 84.25 86.00 81.63

Ts Average Stack Temperature, °F 127.04 127.70 126.92 129.63 127.82

CO2 Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00

O2 Oxygen content, % by volume 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.80

N2 Nitrogen content, % by volume 79.2 79.2 79.2 79.2 79.20

Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Circular Stack? 1=Y,0=N: 1 1 1 1 1.00

As Diameter or Dimensions, inches: 95.35 95.35 95.35 95.35 95.35

Q Sample Run Duration, minutes 70 70 70 70 70.00

CALCULATED DATA

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume,L360.886 71.108 66.340 59.712 64.511

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume,ft32.150 2.511 2.343 2.108 2.334

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, m30.061 0.071 0.066 0.060 0.066

Qm Average Sampling Rate, dscfm 0.870 1.016 0.948 0.853 0.944

Ps Stack Pressure, inches Hg 29.03 29.04 29.04 29.04 29.036

Bw s Moisture, % by volume 6.8 6.7 5.5 5.5 6.333

1-Bw s Dry Mole Fraction 0.932 0.933 0.945 0.945 0.937

Md Molecular Weight (d.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.832

Ms Molecular Weight (w.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.10 28.11 28.24 28.24 28.146

Vs Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s 58.9 59.6 58.6 58.5 59.065

A Stack Area, ft2 49.6 49.6 49.6 49.6 49.587

Qa Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm 175,370 177,425 174,399 174,156 175731.368

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm 142,579 144,279 143,841 142,969 143566.188

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm 4,037 4,086 4,073 4,048 4065.342

Analyte Mercury Mercury Mercury Mercury

spike amount, ug 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

Analysis, u g/sample with spike 1.688 1.782 1.629 1.676 1.693

ug/sample without spike 0.688 0.782 0.629 0.676 0.693

Molecular Weight, MW 200.6 200.6 200.6 200.6 200.6

Concentration, lb/dscf 7.04E-10 6.85E-10 5.91E-10 7.05E-10 0.0

ppmdv Parts Per Million, Wet Basis 1.35E-03 1.32E-03 1.13E-03 1.35E-03 1.29E-03

Parts Per Million, Dry Basis 1.45E-03 1.41E-03 1.20E-03 1.43E-03 1.37E-03

Emission Rate, lb/hr 6.46E-03 6.35E-03 5.39E-03 6.40E-03 6.15E-03

Concentration, ug/dscm 11.29 10.99 9.48 11.32 10.771

Production Rate, tph 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50

Emission rate, lbs/ton 6.80E-04 6.69E-04 5.68E-04 6.74E-04 6.48E-04
Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

050352.0031

Eramet - Marietta, OH

EPA Method 30B-Mercury - Unspiked

Furnace #12 Scrubber

Page 1 of 2

RUN NUMBER FC12-US-1 FC12-US-2 FC12-US-3 FC12-US-4

RUN DATE 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 10/16/2014 Average

RUN TIME 1456-1704 1158-1308 1341-1451 1510-1620

MEASURED DATA

Pstatic Stack Static Pressure, inches H2O -0.47 -0.37 -0.35 -0.38 -0.39

y Meter Box Correction Factor 1.0048 1.0048 1.0048 1.0048 1.005

Pbar Barometric Pressure, inches Hg 29.065 29.065 29.065 29.065 29.07

Vm Sample Volume, L357.477 63.346 60.541 53.948 58.828

Dp1/2 Average Square Root Dp, (in. H2O)1/2 0.9675 0.9786 0.9648 0.9612 0.9680

Tm Average Meter Temperature, °F 77.50 83.00 85.50 87.88 83

Ts Average Stack Temperature, °F 127.04 127.70 126.92 129.63 128

CO2 Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

O2 Oxygen content, % by volume 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8

N2 Nitrogen content, % by volume 79.2 79.2 79.2 79.2 79.2

Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Circular Stack? 1=Y,0=N: 1 1 1 1 1.0000

As Diameter or Dimensions, inches: 95.35 95.35 95.35 95.35 95.35

Q Sample Run Duration, minutes 70 70 70 70 70

CALCULATED DATA

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume,L355.111 60.123 57.197 50.747 55.795

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume,ft31.946 2.123 2.020 1.792 2.030

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, m30.055 0.060 0.057 0.051 0.057

Qm Average Sampling Rate, dscfm 0.787 0.859 0.817 0.725 0.821

Ps Stack Pressure, inches Hg 29.03 29.04 29.04 29.04 29.04

Bw s Moisture, % by volume 6.8 6.7 5.5 5.5 6.3

1-Bw s Dry Mole Fraction 0.932 0.933 0.945 0.945 0.937

Md Molecular Weight (d.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83

Ms Molecular Weight (w.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.10 28.11 28.24 28.24 28.15

Vs Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s 58.9 59.6 58.6 58.5 59.1

A Stack Area, ft2 49.6 49.6 49.6 49.6 49.59

Qa Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm 175,370 177,425 174,399 174,156 175,731

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm 142,579 144,279 143,841 142,969 143,566

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm 4,037 4,086 4,073 4,048 4,065

Analyte Mercury Mercury Mercury Mercury

Analysis, u g/sample 0.557 0.617 0.517 0.486

Molecular Weight, MW 200.6 200.6 200.6 200.6 200.6

Concentration, lb/dscf 6.30E-10 6.40E-10 5.64E-10 5.97E-10 0.0

ppmdv Parts Per Million, Wet Basis 1.21E-03 1.23E-03 1.08E-03 1.15E-03 1.17E-03

Parts Per Million, Dry Basis 1.30E-03 1.32E-03 1.15E-03 1.21E-03 1.24E-03

Emission Rate, lb/hr 5.78E-03 5.94E-03 5.15E-03 5.42E-03 5.57E-03

Concentration, ug/dscm 10.11 10.27 9.05 9.58 9.753

Production Rate, tph 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50

Emission rate, lbs/ton 6.09E-04 6.25E-04 5.42E-04 5.70E-04 5.87E-04
Run No. Ms Vs, L Mu Vu, L Mv S 

Relative 

Deviation, 

%

a

ug/dscm 

absolute 

differenceb

FURNACE 12

12-1 1681.68 70 60.89 557.83 70 55.11 17.50 1000.0 106.54 -5.51

12-2 1781.64 70 71.11 618.05 70 60.12 14.78 1000.0 105.07 -3.4

12-3 1628.76 70 66.34 517.61 70 57.20 15.50 1000.0 102.84 -2.33

12-4 1684.68 70 59.71 486.28 70 50.75 18.63 1000.0 111.25 -8.30

Average 1694.19 70 64.51 544.94 70 55.8 16.60 1000.0 106.42 -4.89

FURNACE 1 MAIN BAGHOUSE

MB-1 12646.41 90 88.46 6762 90 72.91 50.22 3800.0 116.90 -3.74

MB-2 14294.63 90 83.76 9702 90 71.65 35.25 3800.0 77.70 3.91

MB-3 12995.15 90 82.50 7467.60 90 70.64 51.80 3800.0 112.46 -2.64

MB-4 10642.8 90 94.16 5487.22 90 79.07 43.64 3800.0 108.12 -2.32

Average 12644.75 90 87.22 7354.71 90 73.57 45.23 3800.0 103.79 -1.20

Example Calculation: Mv = (Ms/Vs)-(Mu/Vu)

Recovery Efficiency, %: RE, % = (Mv * Vs)/ S Must be between 85% and 115%

Relative Deviation, % RD, % = |Ca-Cb|/(Ca+Cb) * 100

Where:

Mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound measured.

Ms = Total mass of compound measured on spiked tubes (ug).

Vs = Volume of stack gas sampled with spiked tubes (liters).

Mu = Total mass of compound measured on unspiked tubes ( ug).

Vu = Volume of stack gas sampled with unspiked tubes (liters).

S = Theoretical mass of compound spiked on tubes for spiked train (ug).

Ca = Hg concentration ug/dscm in trap a, unspiked

Cb = Hg concentration ug/dscm in trab b, spiked

a

 RD <= 10% for concentrations >=1 ug/dscm

b

 <=20% RD or <=0.2 ug/dscm absolute difference for Hg concentrations less than 1 ug/dscm

EPA Method 30B Mercury Sampling

Recover

y 

Efficienc

y, %

Sample 

Time, min

Sample 

Time, min

QA/QC Summary of Mercury Test Results

050352.0031

ERAMET MARIETTA, INC.
FURNACE 1 MAIN BAGHOUSE CALCULATIONS
RUN NUMBER MB-429-1 MB-429-2 MB-429-3 MB-429-4

RUN DATE 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 Average

RUN TIME 0820-0954 1020-1155 1220-1355 1420-1553

MEASURED DATA

g Meter Box Correction Factor 0.941 0.941 0.941 0.941 0.941

H Avg Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H2O 1.38 1.21 1.13 1.27 1.248

Pbar Barometric Pressure, inches Hg 30.03 30.03 30.03 30.03 30.03

Vm

Sample Volume, ft3

64.463 59.051 55.184 58.361 59.265

Tm Average Meter Temperature, °F 79 87 90 85 85

Pstatic Stack Static Pressure, inches H2O -0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47

Ts Average Stack Temperature, °F 171 201 207 185 191

Vl c Condensate Collected, ml 33.0 32.0 25.0 23.0 28.3

CO2 Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0

O2 Oxygen content, % by volume 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5

N2 Nitrogen content, % by volume 79.5 79.5 79.5 79.5 79.5

Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

p

1/2 Average Square Root Dp, (in. H2O )1/2 0.7913 0.7545 0.7297 0.7645 0.7600

Circular Stack? 1=Y,0=N: 1 1 1 1 1.00

As Diameter or Dimensions, inches: 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00

Q Sample Run Duration, minutes 90 90 90 90 90

Dn Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.223 0.223 0.223 0.223 0.223

CALCULATED DATA

An Nozzle Area, ft20.00027 0.00027 0.00027 0.00027 0.00027

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, dscf 59.767 53.976 50.134 53.586 54.366

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, dscm 1.692 1.528 1.420 1.517 1.539

Ps Stack Pressure, inches Hg 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00

Bws Moisture, % by volume 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.4

Bws(sat) Moisture (at saturation), % by volume 41.3 79.0 89.5 56.5 66.6

Vwstd Standard Water Vapor Volume, ft31.553 1.506 1.177 1.083 1.330

1-Bws Dry Mole Fraction 0.975 0.973 0.977 0.980 0.976

Md Molecular Weight (d.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.82 28.82 28.82 28.82 28.82

Ms Molecular Weight (w.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.55 28.53 28.57 28.61 28.56

Vs Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s 48.8 47.6 46.2 47.6 47.5

A Stack Area, ft2 78.54 78.54 78.54 78.54 78.54

Qa Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm 229,839 224,327 217,779 224,270 224,054

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm 187,907 174,827 168,899 180,391 178,006

Qs(cmm) Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm 5,320.9 4,950.6 4,782.7 5,108.1 5040.6

I Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, % 102.4 99.4 95.5 95.6 98.2

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #1 Main Baghouse

Page 1 of 6
RUN NUMBER MB-429-1 MB-429-2 MB-429-3 MB-429-4

RUN DATE 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 Average

RUN TIME 0820-0954 1020-1155 1220-1355 1420-1553

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH:

Naphthalene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 471000.0 458000.0 326000.0 347000.0 400500.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 2.78E+05 3.00E+05 2.30E+05 2.29E+05 2.59E+05

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 8.88E+07 8.90E+07 6.59E+07 7.01E+07 7.85E+07

1 - Methylnaphthalene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 55200.0 74800.0 41000.0 49900.0 55225.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 3.26E+04 4.89E+04 2.89E+04 3.29E+04 3.58E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.04E+07 1.45E+07 8.29E+06 1.01E+07 1.08E+07

2 - Methylnaphthalene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 74800.0 103000.0 53700.0 71100.0 75650.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 4.42E+04 6.74E+04 3.78E+04 4.69E+04 4.91E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.41E+07 2.00E+07 1.09E+07 1.44E+07 1.48E+07

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #1 Main Baghouse

Page 2 of 6
RUN NUMBER MB-429-1 MB-429-2 MB-429-3 MB-429-4

RUN DATE 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 Average

RUN TIME 0820-0954 1020-1155 1220-1355 1420-1553

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH's:

Acenaphthylene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 153000.0 188000.0 75000.0 129000.0 136250.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 9.04E+04 1.23E+05 5.28E+04 8.50E+04 8.78E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 2.89E+07 3.65E+07 1.52E+07 2.61E+07 2.67E+07

Acenaphthene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 32000.0 43400.0 19400.0 20900.0 28925.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.89E+04 2.84E+04 1.37E+04 1.38E+04 1.87E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 6.04E+06 8.43E+06 3.92E+06 4.22E+06 5.65E+06

Fluorene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 70200.0 121000.0 41500.0 70100.0 75700.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 4.15E+04 7.92E+04 2.92E+04 4.62E+04 4.90E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.32E+07 2.35E+07 8.39E+06 1.42E+07 1.48E+07

Phenanthrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 2020000.0 1590000.0 1590000.0 1370000.0 1642500.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.19E+06 1.04E+06 1.12E+06 9.03E+05 1.06E+06

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 3.81E+08 3.09E+08 3.21E+08 2.77E+08 3.22E+08

Anthracene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 343000.0 203000.0 208000.0 167000.0 230250.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 2.03E+05 1.33E+05 1.47E+05 1.10E+05 1.48E+05

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 6.47E+07 3.95E+07 4.20E+07 3.37E+07 4.50E+07

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #1 Main Baghouse

Page 3 of 6
RUN NUMBER MB-429-1 MB-429-2 MB-429-3 MB-429-4

RUN DATE 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 Average

RUN TIME 0820-0954 1020-1155 1220-1355 1420-1553

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH's:

Fluoranthene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 3620000.0 4790000.0 4100000.0 2070000.0 3645000.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 2.14E+06 3.13E+06 2.89E+06 1.36E+06 2.38E+06

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 6.83E+08 9.31E+08 8.29E+08 4.18E+08 7.15E+08

Pyrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 2600000.0 3550000.0 2990000.0 1430000.0 2642500.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.54E+06 2.32E+06 2.11E+06 9.42E+05 1.73E+06

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 4.90E+08 6.90E+08 6.04E+08 2.89E+08 5.18E+08

Benzo (a) Anthracene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 268000.0 570000.0 707000.0 177000.0 430500.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.58E+05 3.73E+05 4.98E+05 1.17E+05 2.86E+05

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 5.06E+07 1.11E+08 1.43E+08 3.58E+07 8.50E+07

Chrysene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 473000.0 1250000.0 1480000.0 461000.0 916000.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 2.79E+05 8.18E+05 1.04E+06 3.04E+05 6.11E+05

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 8.92E+07 2.43E+08 2.99E+08 9.31E+07 1.81E+08

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 141000.0 419000.0 614000.0 178000.0 338000.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 8.33E+04 2.74E+05 4.33E+05 1.17E+05 2.27E+05

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 2.66E+07 8.14E+07 1.24E+08 3.60E+07 6.70E+07

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

Furnace #1 Main Baghouse

Page 4 of 6
RUN NUMBER MB-429-1 MB-429-2 MB-429-3 MB-429-4

RUN DATE 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 Average

RUN TIME 0820-0954 1020-1155 1220-1355 1420-1553

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH's:

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 41100.0 112000.0 207000.0 59300.0 104850.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 2.43E+04 7.33E+04 1.46E+05 3.91E+04 7.06E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 7.75E+06 2.18E+07 4.18E+07 1.20E+07 2.08E+07

Benzo (e) Pyrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 51900.0 149000.0 233000.0 75000.0 127225.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 3.07E+04 9.75E+04 1.64E+05 4.94E+04 8.54E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 9.79E+06 2.90E+07 4.71E+07 1.51E+07 2.52E+07

Benzo (a) Pyrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 22600.0 60300.0 121000.0 30000.0 58475.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 1.34E+04 3.95E+04 8.52E+04 1.98E+04 3.95E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 4.26E+06 1.17E+07 2.45E+07 6.06E+06 1.16E+07

Perylene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 4080.0 8800.0 20600.0 6220.0 9925.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 2.41E+03 5.76E+03 1.45E+04 4.10E+03 6.69E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 7.70E+05 1.71E+06 4.16E+06 1.26E+06 1.98E+06

Indeno (1, 2, 3 - cd) Pyrene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 8370.0 22900.0 40300.0 11200.0 20692.50

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 4.95E+03 1.50E+04 2.84E+04 7.38E+03 1.39E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.58E+06 4.45E+06 8.15E+06 2.26E+06 4.11E+06

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #1 Main Baghouse

Page 5 of 6
RUN NUMBER MB-429-1 MB-429-2 MB-429-3 MB-429-4

RUN DATE 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 Average

RUN TIME 0820-0954 1020-1155 1220-1355 1420-1553

EMISSIONS DATA

PAH's:

Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 1190.0 4120.0 5890.0 1980.0 3295.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 7.03E+02 2.70E+03 4.15E+03 1.30E+03 2.21E+03

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 2.24E+05 8.01E+05 1.19E+06 4.00E+05 6.54E+05

Benzo (ghi) Perylene ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 7330.0 17700.0 27600.0 8400.0 15257.50

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 4.33E+03 1.16E+04 1.94E+04 5.54E+03 1.02E+04

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.38E+06 3.44E+06 5.58E+06 1.70E+06 3.02E+06

Total PAH ADL ADL ADL ADL ADL

(ng) Catch, ng 10457770.0 13735020.0 12900990.0 6733100.0 10956720.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 6.18E+06 8.99E+06 9.09E+06 4.44E+06 7.17E+06

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.97E+09 2.67E+09 2.61E+09 1.36E+09 2.15E+09

Total PAH lbs/hr 4.35E+00 5.88E+00 5.74E+00 3.00E+00 4.74E+00

Production rate, tph 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 1.09E+01

Emission rate, lbs/ton 0.40 0.54 0.53 0.27 4.35E-01

( ) Not Detected. Value shown is the detection limit for that sample. 

{ } Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. 

Page 6 of 6

Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

Eramet- Marietta, Ohio

US EPA Test Method 429 - PAH

Furnace #1 Main Baghouse 19-PAH

(ng) Catch, ng 10402570.00 13660220.00 12859990.00 6683200.00 10901495.00

(ng/dscm) Concentration, ng/dscm, as measured 6.15E+06 8.94E+06 9.06E+06 4.40E+06 7136794.19

(μg/hr) Emission Rate, μg/hr 1.96E+09 2.65E+09 2.60E+09 1.35E+09 2.14E+09

Total 19-PAH lbs/hr 4.32E+00 5.85E+00 5.73E+00 2.97E+00 4.72E+00

Production rate, tph 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.90

Emission rate, lbs/ton 0.40 0.54 0.53 0.27 0.43
Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

050352.0031

Eramet - Marietta, OH

EPA Method 30B-Mercury - Spiked

Furnace #1 Main Baghouse

Page 1 of 2

RUN NUMBER MB-S-1 MB-S-2 MB-S-3 MB-S-4

RUN DATE 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 Average

RUN TIME 820-950 1020-1150 1220-1350 1420-1550

MEASURED DATA

Pstatic Stack Static Pressure, inches H2O -0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47

y Meter Box Correction Factor 0.9966 0.9966 0.9966 0.9966 0.997

Pbar Barometric Pressure, inches Hg 29.107 29.107 29.107 29.107 29.11

Vm Sample Volume, L392.983 91.748 91.432 101.255 94.355

Dp1/2 Average Square Root Dp, (in. H2O)1/2 0.7913 0.7545 0.7297 0.7645 0.7600

Tm Average Meter Temperature, °F 78.10 100.70 107.30 90.50 94

Ts Average Stack Temperature, °F 170.79 200.50 206.58 184.79 191

CO2 Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

O2 Oxygen content, % by volume 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8

N2 Nitrogen content, % by volume 79.2 79.2 79.2 79.2 79.2

Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Circular Stack? 1=Y,0=N: 1 1 1 1 1.0000

As Diameter or Dimensions, inches: 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00

Q Sample Run Duration, minutes 90 90 90 90 90

CALCULATED DATA

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume,L388.457 83.764 82.504 94.156 87.220

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume,ft33.123 2.958 2.913 3.325 2.998

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, m30.088 0.084 0.083 0.094 0.085

Qm Average Sampling Rate, dscfm 0.983 0.931 0.917 1.046 0.943

Ps Stack Pressure, inches Hg 29.07 29.07 29.07 29.07 29.07

Bw s Moisture, % by volume 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.5

1-Bw s Dry Mole Fraction 0.975 0.973 0.977 0.977 0.975

Md Molecular Weight (d.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83

Ms Molecular Weight (w.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.56 28.54 28.58 28.58 28.56

Vs Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s 49.5 48.3 46.9 48.4 48.3

A Stack Area, ft2 78.5 78.5 78.5 78.5 78.54

Qa Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm 233,394 227,807 221,163 227,892 227,455

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm 185,008 172,103 166,240 177,086 174,450

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm 5,239 4,873 4,707 5,015 4,940

Analyte Mercury Mercury Mercury Mercury

spike amount, ug 3.800 3.800 3.800 3.800

Analysis, u g/sample with spike 12.642 14.288 12.995 10.643 12.642

ug/sample without spike 8.842 10.488 9.195 6.843 8.842

Molecular Weight, MW 200.6 200.6 200.6 200.6 200.6

Concentration, lb/dscf 6.23E-09 7.80E-09 6.94E-09 4.53E-09 0.0

ppmdv Parts Per Million, Wet Basis 1.20E-02 1.50E-02 1.33E-02 8.70E-03 1.22E-02

Parts Per Million, Dry Basis 1.23E-02 1.54E-02 1.37E-02 8.90E-03 1.26E-02

Emission Rate, lb/hr 7.09E-02 8.28E-02 7.09E-02 4.92E-02 6.85E-02

Concentration, ug/dscm 99.96 125.21 111.45 72.68 102.324

Production Rate, tph 17.02 17.02 17.02 17.02 17.02

Emission rate, lbs/ton 4.17E-03 4.86E-03 4.17E-03 2.89E-03 4.02E-03
Summary of Stack Gas Parameters and Test Results

050352.0031

Eramet - Marietta, OH

EPA Method 30B-Mercury - Unspiked

Furnace #1 Main Baghouse

Page 1 of 2

RUN NUMBER MB-US-1 MB-US-2 MB-US-3 MB-US-4

RUN DATE 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 10/15/2014 Average

RUN TIME 820-950 1020-1150 1220-1350 1420-1550

MEASURED DATA

Pstatic Stack Static Pressure, inches H2O -0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47

y Meter Box Correction Factor 1.0048 1.0048 1.0048 1.0048 1.005

Pbar Barometric Pressure, inches Hg 29.107 29.107 29.107 29.107 29.11

Vm Sample Volume, L376.337 78.035 77.455 84.351 79.045

Dp1/2 Average Square Root Dp, (in. H2O)1/2 0.7913 0.7545 0.7297 0.7645 0.7600

Tm Average Meter Temperature, °F 80.40 102.10 105.90 90.60 95

Ts Average Stack Temperature, °F 170.79 200.50 206.58 184.79 191

CO2 Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

O2 Oxygen content, % by volume 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8

N2 Nitrogen content, % by volume 79.2 79.2 79.2 79.2 79.2

Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Circular Stack? 1=Y,0=N: 1 1 1 1 1.0000

As Diameter or Dimensions, inches: 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00

Q Sample Run Duration, minutes 90 90 90 90 90

CALCULATED DATA

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume,L372.907 71.651 70.641 79.068 73.567

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume,ft32.574 2.530 2.494 2.792 2.533

Vm(std) Standard Meter Volume, m30.073 0.072 0.071 0.079 0.072

Qm Average Sampling Rate, dscfm 0.810 0.796 0.785 0.879 0.797

Ps Stack Pressure, inches Hg 29.07 29.07 29.07 29.07 29.07

Bw s Moisture, % by volume 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.5

1-Bw s Dry Mole Fraction 0.975 0.973 0.977 0.977 0.975

Md Molecular Weight (d.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83

Ms Molecular Weight (w.b.), lb/lb•mole 28.56 28.54 28.58 28.58 28.56

Vs Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s 49.5 48.3 46.9 48.4 48.3

A Stack Area, ft2 78.5 78.5 78.5 78.5 78.54

Qa Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm 233,394 227,807 221,163 227,892 227,455

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm 185,008 172,103 166,240 177,086 174,450

Qs Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscmm 5,239 4,873 4,707 5,015 4,940

Analyte Mercury Mercury Mercury Mercury

Analysis, u g/sample 6.762 9.702 7.467 5.486

Molecular Weight, MW 200.6 200.6 200.6 200.6 200.6

Concentration, lb/dscf 5.78E-09 8.44E-09 6.59E-09 4.32E-09 0.0

ppmdv Parts Per Million, Wet Basis 1.11E-02 1.62E-02 1.26E-02 8.30E-03 1.21E-02

Parts Per Million, Dry Basis 1.14E-02 1.67E-02 1.29E-02 8.50E-03 1.24E-02

Emission Rate, lb/hr 6.58E-02 8.95E-02 6.72E-02 4.70E-02 6.74E-02

Concentration, ug/dscm 92.75 135.41 105.70 69.38 100.810

Production Rate, tph 10.90 10.90 10.90 10.90 10.90

Emission rate, lbs/ton 6.04E-03 8.21E-03 6.17E-03 4.31E-03 6.18E-03
Run No. Ms Vs, L Mu Vu, L Mv S 

Relative 

Deviation, 

%

a

ug/dscm 

absolute 

differenceb

FURNACE 12

12-1 1681.68 70 60.89 557.83 70 55.11 17.50 1000.0 106.54 -5.51

12-2 1781.64 70 71.11 618.05 70 60.12 14.78 1000.0 105.07 -3.4

12-3 1628.76 70 66.34 517.61 70 57.20 15.50 1000.0 102.84 -2.33

12-4 1684.68 70 59.71 486.28 70 50.75 18.63 1000.0 111.25 -8.30

Average 1694.19 70 64.51 544.94 70 55.8 16.60 1000.0 106.42 -4.89

FURNACE 1 MAIN BAGHOUSE

MB-1 12646.41 90 88.46 6762 90 72.91 50.22 3800.0 116.90 -3.74

MB-2 14294.63 90 83.76 9702 90 71.65 35.25 3800.0 77.70 3.91

MB-3 12995.15 90 82.50 7467.60 90 70.64 51.80 3800.0 112.46 -2.64

MB-4 10642.8 90 94.16 5487.22 90 79.07 43.64 3800.0 108.12 -2.32

Average 12644.75 90 87.22 7354.71 90 73.57 45.23 3800.0 103.79 -1.20

Example Calculation: Mv = (Ms/Vs)-(Mu/Vu)

Recovery Efficiency, %: RE, % = (Mv * Vs)/ S Must be between 85% and 115%

Relative Deviation, % RD, % = |Ca-Cb|/(Ca+Cb) * 100

Where:

Mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound measured.

Ms = Total mass of compound measured on spiked tubes (ug).

Vs = Volume of stack gas sampled with spiked tubes (liters).

Mu = Total mass of compound measured on unspiked tubes ( ug).

Vu = Volume of stack gas sampled with unspiked tubes (liters).

S = Theoretical mass of compound spiked on tubes for spiked train (ug).

Ca = Hg concentration ug/dscm in trap a, unspiked

Cb = Hg concentration ug/dscm in trab b, spiked

a

 RD <= 10% for concentrations >=1 ug/dscm

b

 <=20% RD or <=0.2 ug/dscm absolute difference for Hg concentrations less than 1 ug/dscm

EPA Method 30B Mercury Sampling

Recover

y 

Efficienc

y, %

Sample 

Time, min

Sample 

Time, min

QA/QC Summary of Mercury Test Results

050352.0031

ERAMET MARIETTA, INC.
APPENDIX B

FIELD DATA
FURNACE 12

PAH
Traverse Point Locations

Project No.: 50352.0031 Up Down Points Points PointsPlant: Eramet Stream Stream Circle Rect VelocityLocation: Marietta, OH 2-4.99 .5-1.24 24 25 16Date: 10/15/14 5-5.99 1.25-1.49 20 20 16Source: Furnace 12 6-6.99 1.5-1.74 16 16 12Stack Diameter(inch): 1 95.35 7-7.99 1.75-1.99 12 12 12Stack Length >=8 >=2 8 or 12 9 or 12 8 or 9 or 12Stack Width Use smaller number when <24" diameterNipple Length: 1.3 0.4Nearest Upstream Disturbance (C): 120 Diameters DiametersNearest Downstream Disturbance (D): 34

Equivalent Diameter #DIV/0! Check minimum number of points 

for up and down stream then use largest

Traverse Points in Circular Stacks

% of stack point w/port % of stack point w/port % of stack point w/port % of stack point w/port % of stack point w/port

1 6.7 6.4 4.4 4.2 3.2 3.1 2.6 2.5 2.1 2.02 25 23.8 14.6 13.9 10.5 10.0 8.2 7.8 6.7 6.43 75 71.5 29.6 28.2 19.4 18.5 14.6 13.9 11.8 11.34 93.3 89.0 70.4 67.1 32.3 30.8 22.6 21.5 17.7 16.95 85.4 81.4 67.7 64.6 34.2 32.6 25 23.86 95.6 91.2 80.6 76.9 65.8 62.7 35.6 33.97 89.5 85.3 77.4 73.8 64.4 61.48 96.8 92.3 85.4 81.4 75 71.59 91.8 87.5 82.3 78.5

10 97.4 92.9 88.2 84.111 93.3 89.012 97.9 93.3

4 6 12 8 10
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA

, ,

Plant Eramet Ambient Temperature 66Date 10/15/14 Barometric Pressure 29.07Location Marietta, OH Assumed Moisture % 5 Meter 0.001 @ 15 "HGOperator TG/JC Probe Length, in. 60 Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H2OSource Furnace 12 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.25Run No. 1 Stack Diameter, in. 95.35Sample Box Probe Heater Setting naMeter Box 609198 Oven Heat Setting na Post-Test Leak CheckMeter dH @ 1.837 Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Meter 0.001 @ 15 "HG Y = 0.941 Filter No. Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H20Time Start 10:10 Imp #Time End 11:23 Static Pressure -0.35 O 2 20.5 CO2 0

Point Time T s T m dP Square dH Vm. Probe Oven Outlet Vacuum K ISO AFPM

No. (min) Root ft. Stream Factor Calc

1 0.0 125 60 1.00 1 3.4 378.789 253 257 52 5 3.39 98.5 3606.62 3.0 127 62 0.98 0.9899 3.3 382.020 254 248 49 6 3.39 95.4 3551.03 6.0 127 65 0.95 0.9747 3.2 385.100 252 254 48 6 3.41 100.5 3588.24 9.0 127 67 0.97 0.9849 3.3 388.400 248 251 48 7 3.43 87.6 3606.65 12.0 127 70 0.98 0.9899 3.4 391.300 252 251 50 7 3.45 106.6 3554.06 15.0 128 73 0.95 0.9747 3.3 394.800 253 251 52 7 3.46 102.9 3459.27 18.0 128 74 0.90 0.9487 3.1 398.100 249 253 53 7 3.47 88.6 3401.18 21.0 128 76 0.87 0.9327 3.0 400.900 253 250 54 8 3.48 98.8 3361.89 24.0 128 77 0.85 0.922 3.0 404.000 253 259 55 8 3.49 90.1 3322.0

10 27.0 128 77 0.83 0.911 2.9 406.800 249 255 55 8 3.49 101.8 3361.811 30.0 128 78 0.85 0.922 3.0 410.000 250 246 56 8 3.49 97.4 3398.212 33.0 127 79 0.87 0.9327 3.0 413.100 248 253 57 8 3.51 84.6 3646.413 36.0 128 77 1.00 1 3.5 416.000 251 245 58 9 3.49 89.7 3821.114 39.0 127 80 1.10 1.0488 3.9 419.200 250 251 59 9 3.51 102.2 3643.315 42.0 127 81 1.00 1 3.5 422.700 250 255 62 9 3.52 100.5 3591.316 45.0 128 81 0.97 0.9849 3.4 426.100 252 251 63 9 3.51 100.1 3609.717 48.0 128 81 0.98 0.9899 3.4 429.500 252 248 61 9 3.51 91.4 3603.618 51.0 126 81 0.98 0.9899 3.5 432.600 249 251 59 10 3.52 102.0 3529.319 54.0 126 82 0.94 0.9695 3.3 436.000 249 255 56 10 3.53 91.9 3566.620 57.0 126 83 0.96 0.9798 3.4 439.100 249 243 56 10 3.54 93.7 3491.521 60.0 126 83 0.92 0.9592 3.3 442.200 253 249 55 10 3.54 101.4 3434.122 63.0 126 83 0.89 0.9434 3.1 445.500 248 250 54 10 3.54 95.7 3414.823 66.0 126 83 0.88 0.9381 3.1 448.600 248 253 54 10 3.54 96.2 3398.224 69.0 127 83 0.87 0.9327 3.1 451.700 245 250 55 9 3.53 #VALUE! #VALUE!25 72.0 454.891 #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Avg. 127.04 76.50 0.94 0.9675 3.3 76.102 #REF! 3524.9

Pre-Test Leak Check
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA 7

K = 846.72 x Dn^4 x H@ x Cp^2 x Md^2 x (MWd/MWs) x (Tm/Ts) x (Ps/Pm)

Plant Eramet Ambient Temperature 55Date 10/15/14 Barometric Pressure 29.07Location Marietta, OH Assumed Moisture % 5 Meter 0.003 @ 17 "HGOperator TG/JC Probe Length, in. 60 Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H2OSource Furnace 12 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.195Run No. 2 Stack Diameter, in. 95.35Sample Box Probe Heater Setting naMeter Box 609198 Oven Heat Setting na Post-Test Leak CheckMeter dH @ 1.837 Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Meter 0.003 @ 17 "HG Y = 0.941 Filter No. Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H20Time Start 10:20 Imp # 1Time End 11:55 Static Pressure -0.37 O 2 20.5 CO2 0

Point Time T s T m dP Square dH Vm. Probe Oven Outlet Vacuum K ISO AFPM

No. (min) Root ft. Stream Factor Calc

1 "0" 128 66 1.10 1.0488 1.4 455.335 251 257 52 4 1.26 105.8 3827.72 3.0 129 73 1.10 1.0488 1.4 457.600 254 257 51 4 1.28 96.8 3649.63 6 129 75 1.00 1 1.3 459.600 248 256 51 4 1.28 101.3 3649.64 9 129 76 1.00 1 1.3 461.700 248 252 50 5 1.29 87.2 3827.75 12 129 77 1.10 1.0488 1.4 463.600 254 258 48 5 1.29 98.6 3557.26 15 129 78 0.95 0.9747 1.2 465.600 247 253 48 5 1.29 101.1 3462.37 18 129 78 0.90 0.9487 1.2 467.600 252 253 48 5 1.29 97.2 3420.78 21 128 78 0.88 0.9381 1.1 469.500 251 258 48 5 1.29 93.5 3361.99 24 128 79 0.85 0.922 1.1 471.300 248 249 49 5 1.30 98.6 3359.0

10 27 127 79 0.85 0.922 1.1 473.200 252 251 49 5 1.30 98.4 3359.011 30 127 79 0.85 0.922 1.1 475.100 250 258 49 5 1.30 91.7 3414.912 33 126 80 0.88 0.9381 1.1 476.900 253 249 50 5 1.30 86.3 3817.913 36 126 77 1.10 1.0488 1.4 478.800 253 256 52 5 1.29 96.1 3814.714 39 125 79 1.10 1.0488 1.4 480.900 248 245 50 5 1.30 95.6 3814.715 42 125 80 1.10 1.0488 1.4 483.000 251 255 49 5 1.30 100.0 3640.316 45 126 80 1.00 1 1.3 485.100 252 256 48 5 1.30 95.2 3646.517 48 128 80 1.00 1 1.3 487.100 251 258 48 5 1.30 102.3 3572.818 51 128 81 0.96 0.9798 1.2 489.200 251 252 49 5 1.30 102.1 3572.819 54 128 81 0.96 0.9798 1.2 491.300 245 253 49 5 1.30 84.5 3494.620 57 127 81 0.92 0.9592 1.2 493.000 252 253 50 5 1.30 110.3 3459.321 60 128 81 0.90 0.9487 1.2 495.200 248 253 51 5 1.30 86.3 3420.722 63 128 81 0.88 0.9381 1.1 496.900 251 253 50 5 1.30 103.3 3361.923 66 128 81 0.85 0.922 1.1 498.900 242 250 49 5 1.30 89.9 3284.624 69 129 81 0.81 0.9 1.1 500.600 250 256 49 5 1.30 #VALUE! #VALUE!25 72 502.429 #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Avg. 127.67 78.4 0.96 0.9786 1.2 47.094 #DIV/0! 14129.4

Pre-Test Leak Check
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA

K = 846.72 x Dn^4 x H@ x Cp^2 x Md^2 x (MWd/MWs) x (Tm/Ts) x (Ps/Pm)

Plant Eramet Ambient Temperature 55Date 10/15/14 Barometric Pressure 29.07Location Marietta, OH Assumed Moisture % 5 Meter 0.001 @ 15 "HGOperator TG/JC Probe Length, in. 60 Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H2OSource Furnace 12 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.25Run No. 3 Stack Diameter, in. 95.35Sample Box Probe Heater Setting 248Meter Box 609198 Oven Heat Setting 248 Post-Test Leak CheckMeter dH @ 1.837 Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Meter 0.001 @ 15 "HG Y = 0.941 Filter No. Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H20Time Start 13:32 Imp # 1Time End 14:45 Static Pressure -0.35 O 2 20.5 CO2 0

Point Time T s T m dP Square dH Vm. Probe Oven Outlet Vacuum K ISO AFPM

No. (min) Root ft. Stream Factor Calc

1 "0" 124 69 1.10 1.0488 3.8 502.835 252 258 57 8 3.46 95.1 3824.32 3.0 128 73 1.10 1.0488 3.8 506.2 242 248 58 8 3.46 94.8 3643.33 6 127 76 1.00 1 3.5 509.4 254 247 58 8 3.49 86.3 3600.54 9 125 78 0.98 0.9899 3.4 512.3 249 255 58 8 3.51 83.6 3563.65 12 125 81 0.96 0.9798 3.4 515.1 247 257 56 8 3.53 98.9 3529.36 15 126 83 0.94 0.9695 3.3 518.4 248 251 58 8 3.54 86.6 3411.97 18 125 84 0.88 0.9381 3.1 521.2 251 252 54 9 3.55 87.7 3356.18 21 126 84 0.85 0.922 3.0 524.0 251 248 52 9 3.54 87.9 3353.29 24 125 84 0.85 0.922 3.0 526.8 249 250 51 9 3.55 53.3 3353.2

10 27 125 85 0.85 0.922 3.0 528.5 253 252 53 9 3.56 90.2 3372.911 30 125 85 0.86 0.9274 3.1 531.4 247 258 55 8 3.56 91.2 3336.312 33 126 86 0.84 0.9165 3.0 534.3 249 252 56 8 3.56 88.6 3603.613 36 126 85 0.98 0.9899 3.5 537.3 249 254 60 9 3.55 75.8 3821.114 39 127 86 1.10 1.0488 3.9 540.1 248 255 56 9 3.55 107.5 3817.815 42 126 86 1.10 1.0488 3.9 544.0 249 251 55 10 3.56 108.3 3591.316 45 128 87 0.97 0.9849 3.4 547.7 247 251 53 9 3.55 105.3 3494.517 48 127 87 0.92 0.9592 3.3 551.2 251 258 52 9 3.56 81.8 3462.218 51 129 87 0.90 0.9487 3.2 553.9 246 256 51 9 3.55 93.2 3500.419 54 129 88 0.92 0.9592 3.3 557.0 250 261 51 9 3.55 98.2 3423.520 57 129 89 0.88 0.9381 3.1 560.2 253 252 51 9 3.56 95.9 3387.221 60 130 88 0.86 0.9274 3.0 563.3 249 252 51 9 3.55 159.3 3367.522 63 130 89 0.85 0.922 3.0 568.4 252 251 51 9 3.55 164.4 3384.423 66 129 89 0.86 0.9274 3.1 573.7 249 257 51 9 3.56 78.3 3344.824 69 129 89 0.84 0.9165 3.0 576.2 252 254 51 9 3.56 #VALUE! #VALUE!25 72 579.338 #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE!38 _

Avg. 126.92 84.08 0.93 0.9648 3.3 76.503 -587.1 13742.0

Pre-Test Leak Check
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA

K = 846.72 x Dn^4 x H@ x Cp^2 x Md^2 x (MWd/MWs) x (Tm/Ts) x (Ps/Pm)

Plant Eramet Ambient Temperature 55Date 10/15/14 Barometric Pressure 29.07Location Marietta, OH Assumed Moisture % 5 Meter 0.001 @ 15 "HGOperator TG/JC Probe Length, in. 60 Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H2OSource Furnace 12 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.25Run No. 4 Stack Diameter, in. 95.35Sample Box Probe Heater Setting 248Meter Box 609198 Oven Heat Setting 248 Post-Test Leak CheckMeter dH @ 1.837 Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Meter 0.001 @ 15 "HG Y = 0.941 Filter No. Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H20Time Start 15:09 Imp # 1Time End 16:22 Static Pressure -0.38 O 2 20.5 CO2 0

Point Time T s T m dP Square dH Vm. Probe Oven Outlet Vacuum K ISO AFPM

No. (min) Root ft. Stream Factor Calc

1 "0" 129 71 1.10 1.0488 3.8 576.427 248 247 58 8 3.44 95.6 3831.02 3.0 130 72 1.10 1.0488 3.8 579.8 248 261 58 8 3.44 101.0 3652.73 6 130 75 1.00 1 3.5 583.2 254 250 55 10 3.46 101.9 3597.54 9 130 77 0.97 0.9849 3.4 586.6 251 256 52 10 3.47 93.1 3578.95 12 130 80 0.96 0.9798 3.4 589.7 248 258 48 10 3.49 100.4 3616.06 15 130 81 0.98 0.9899 3.4 593.1 253 260 47 10 3.50 102.3 3649.67 18 129 81 1.00 1 3.5 596.6 252 257 47 10 3.51 100.1 3404.18 21 129 82 0.87 0.9327 3.1 599.8 252 258 47 10 3.51 88.4 3364.89 24 129 83 0.85 0.922 3.0 602.6 247 252 47 10 3.52 108.1 3333.4

10 27 132 83 0.83 0.911 2.9 606.0 246 253 47 10 3.50 88.3 3376.211 30 133 84 0.85 0.922 3.0 608.8 247 250 47 10 3.50 96.0 3327.812 33 130 85 0.83 0.911 2.9 611.8 253 258 47 10 3.53 85.6 3827.713 36 129 85 1.10 1.0488 3.9 614.9 250 253 47 12 3.53 91.2 3827.714 39 129 85 1.10 1.0488 3.9 618.2 250 250 47 12 3.53 118.8 3652.715 42 130 84 1.00 1 3.5 622.3 251 249 48 12 3.52 83.4 3560.216 45 130 84 0.95 0.9747 3.3 625.1 251 258 49 11 3.52 98.8 3541.417 48 130 85 0.94 0.9695 3.3 628.4 255 251 49 11 3.53 115.4 3484.518 51 130 86 0.91 0.9539 3.2 632.2 250 261 50 11 3.53 90.5 3384.519 54 129 86 0.86 0.9274 3.0 635.1 247 256 50 11 3.54 88.8 3324.920 57 129 86 0.83 0.911 2.9 637.9 245 261 50 11 3.54 119.4 3264.321 60 129 86 0.80 0.8944 2.8 641.6 249 256 51 11 3.54 77.4 3264.322 63 129 85 0.80 0.8944 2.8 644.0 246 249 51 11 3.53 102.9 3281.923 66 128 85 0.81 0.9 2.9 647.2 251 255 52 11 3.54 93.7 3261.5

24 69 128 85 0.80 0.8944 2.8 650.1 254 258 53 11 3.54 #VALUE! #VALUE!25 72 652.894 #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE!38 _

Avg. 129.63 82.33 0.93 0.9612 3.3 76.467 -592.2 13721.9

Pre-Test Leak Check




MERCURY




FURNACE 1

PAH
Traverse Point Locations

Project No.: 50352.0031 Up Down Points Points PointsPlant: Eramet Stream Stream Circle Rect VelocityLocation: Marietta, OH 2-4.99 .5-1.24 24 25 16Date: 10/15/14 5-5.99 1.25-1.49 20 20 16Source: Furnace 1 6-6.99 1.5-1.74 16 16 12Stack Diameter(inch): 1 120 7-7.99 1.75-1.99 12 12 12Stack Length >=8 >=2 8 or 12 9 or 12 8 or 9 or 12Stack Width Use smaller number when <24" diameterNipple Length: 1.0 0.3Nearest Upstream Disturbance (C): 120 Diameters DiametersNearest Downstream Disturbance (D): 34Equivalent Diameter #DIV/0! Check minimum number of points 

for up and down stream then use largest

Traverse Points in Circular Stacks

% of stack point w/port % of stack point w/port % of stack point w/port % of stack point w/port % of stack point w/port

1 6.7 8.0 4.4 5.3 3.2 3.8 2.6 3.1 2.1 2.52 25 30.0 14.6 17.5 10.5 12.6 8.2 9.8 6.7 8.03 75 90.0 29.6 35.5 19.4 23.3 14.6 17.5 11.8 14.24 93.3 112.0 70.4 84.5 32.3 38.8 22.6 27.1 17.7 21.25 85.4 102.5 67.7 81.2 34.2 41.0 25 30.06 95.6 114.7 80.6 96.7 65.8 79.0 35.6 42.77 89.5 107.4 77.4 92.9 64.4 77.38 96.8 116.2 85.4 102.5 75 90.09 91.8 110.2 82.3 98.8

10 97.4 116.9 88.2 105.811 93.3 112.012 97.9 117.5

4 6 12 8 10
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA

, ,

Plant Eramet Ambient Temperature 61Date 10/15/14 Barometric Pressure 30.03Location Marietta, OH Assumed Moisture % 3.7 Meter 0.001 @ 10 "HGOperator JC Probe Length, in. 60 Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H2OSource Furnace 1 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.223Run No. 1 Stack Diameter, in. 120Sample Box Probe Heater Setting naMeter Box 609198 Oven Heat Setting na Post-Test Leak CheckMeter dH @ 1.837 Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Meter 0.001 @ 10 "HG Y = 0.941 Filter No. Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H20Time Start 8:20 Imp #Time End 9:54 Static Pressure -0.47 O 2 20.5 CO2 0

Point Time T s T m dP Square dH Vm. Probe Oven Outlet Vacuum K ISO AFPM

No. (min) Root ft. Stream Factor Calc

1 0.0 170 61 0.66 0.8124 1.4 140.469 253 259 55 3 2.12 106.0 3072.32 3.8 168 63 0.69 0.8307 1.5 143.260 253 256 53 3 2.13 105.2 3096.93 7.5 169 67 0.70 0.8367 1.5 146.070 246 258 49 4 2.14 103.8 3109.14 11.3 165 71 0.71 0.8426 1.5 148.870 253 258 46 4 2.17 110.5 2992.85 15.0 163 74 0.66 0.8124 1.4 151.780 252 258 44 4 2.19 115.5 2779.06 18.8 162 76 0.57 0.755 1.3 154.630 250 252 43 4 2.21 93.3 3094.57 22.5 168 78 0.70 0.8367 1.5 157.210 253 256 44 4 2.19 108.5 2876.38 26.3 173 80 0.60 0.7746 1.3 159.980 251 260 44 4 2.18 107.2 2733.09 30.0 175 81 0.54 0.7348 1.2 162.570 253 257 44 4 2.18 95.4 3014.3

10 33.8 172 82 0.66 0.8124 1.4 165.110 247 258 44 4 2.19 107.1 3047.511 37.8 167 83 0.68 0.8246 1.5 168.010 252 251 45 4 2.22 99.8 2679.712 41.3 162 83 0.53 0.728 1.2 170.410 253 259 45 4 2.23 88.0 2995.913 45.0 155 74 0.67 0.8185 1.5 172.796 250 252 44 5 2.22 104.7 2891.414 48.8 159 80 0.62 0.7874 1.4 175.520 246 255 44 5 2.23 102.8 2980.815 52.5 158 82 0.66 0.8124 1.5 178.290 253 259 45 5 2.24 104.0 3015.416 56.3 163 84 0.67 0.8185 1.5 181.140 248 258 45 5 2.23 104.9 2940.417 60.0 170 85 0.63 0.7937 1.4 183.930 246 259 45 4 2.21 106.4 2904.818 63.8 175 85 0.61 0.781 1.3 186.700 253 252 45 4 2.20 115.1 2686.219 67.5 177 86 0.52 0.7211 1.1 189.450 248 251 46 4 2.19 97.3 3007.920 71.3 179 86 0.65 0.8062 1.4 192.050 252 254 46 5 2.19 105.6 2898.921 75.0 183 86 0.60 0.7746 1.3 194.760 253 253 47 4 2.17 106.0 2754.522 78.8 185 86 0.54 0.7348 1.2 197.330 252 256 48 4 2.17 99.4 2888.123 82.5 189 87 0.59 0.7681 1.3 199.850 248 259 48 4 2.16 98.8 2919.224 86.3 192 87 0.60 0.7746 1.3 202.370 253 253 48 4 2.15 #VALUE! #VALUE!25 90.0 204.932 #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Avg. 170.79 79.46 0.63 0.7913 1.4 64.463 #REF! 2933.3

Pre-Test Leak Check
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA 7

K = 846.72 x Dn^4 x H@ x Cp^2 x Md^2 x (MWd/MWs) x (Tm/Ts) x (Ps/Pm)

Plant Eramet Ambient Temperature 55Date 10/15/14 Barometric Pressure 30.03Location Marietta, OH Assumed Moisture % 3.7 Meter 0.002 @ 13 "HGOperator JC Probe Length, in. 60 Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H2OSource Furnace 1 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.223Run No. 2 Stack Diameter, in. 120Sample Box Probe Heater Setting naMeter Box 609198 Oven Heat Setting na Post-Test Leak CheckMeter dH @ 1.837 Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Meter 0.002 @ 4 "HG Y = 0.941 Filter No. Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H20Time Start 10:20 Imp # 1Time End 11:55 Static Pressure -0.47 O 2 20.5 CO2 0

Point Time T s T m dP Square dH Vm. Probe Oven Outlet Vacuum K ISO AFPM

No. (min) Root ft. Stream Factor Calc

1 "0" 183 72 0.58 0.7616 1.2 205.236 253 251 57 3 2.12 107.8 2687.22 3.8 190 74 0.51 0.7141 1.1 207.720 252 261 55 3 2.10 96.0 2923.63 7.5 194 78 0.60 0.7746 1.3 210.110 247 256 54 3 2.11 103.5 2730.14 11.25 198 81 0.52 0.7211 1.1 212.520 252 258 53 3 2.10 103.8 2758.35 15 199 83 0.53 0.728 1.1 214.960 254 257 52 3 2.11 97.9 2916.96 18.75 202 84 0.59 0.7681 1.2 217.400 246 251 51 4 2.10 96.5 3018.77 22.5 204 85 0.63 0.7937 1.3 219.880 252 252 50 4 2.10 106.2 2846.08 26.25 204 86 0.56 0.7483 1.2 222.450 249 262 50 4 2.10 98.8 3005.09 30 198 87 0.63 0.7937 1.3 224.980 249 253 50 4 2.13 100.6 2965.1

10 33.75 191 88 0.62 0.7874 1.3 227.550 249 258 50 4 2.15 108.6 2765.111 37.8 190 91 0.54 0.7348 1.2 230.170 249 261 53 4 2.17 101.1 2813.712 41.25 189 92 0.56 0.7483 1.2 232.670 249 253 53 4 2.18 97.9 2867.913 45 191 83 0.58 0.7616 1.2 235.145 250 255 62 4 2.13 98.7 2901.414 48.75 195 87 0.59 0.7681 1.3 237.620 246 252 57 4 2.14 103.1 2812.015 52.5 200 90 0.55 0.7416 1.2 240.130 252 258 57 4 2.13 97.0 2959.216 56.25 199 90 0.61 0.781 1.3 242.610 250 263 56 4 2.14 96.5 2983.317 60 199 90 0.62 0.7874 1.3 245.100 248 265 57 4 2.14 101.7 2841.718 63.75 202 91 0.56 0.7483 1.2 247.600 249 260 56 4 2.13 96.9 2977.119 67.5 207 92 0.61 0.781 1.3 250.090 247 252 57 4 2.12 98.6 2886.420 71.25 211 92 0.57 0.755 1.2 252.530 253 254 58 4 2.11 105.3 2684.221 75 215 92 0.49 0.7 1.0 254.940 249 259 61 4 2.09 96.2 2916.022 78.75 213 93 0.58 0.7616 1.2 257.320 248 263 62 4 2.10 102.5 2773.323 82.5 219 93 0.52 0.7211 1.1 259.740 253 257 62 4 2.08 96.9 2797.824 86.25 218 93 0.53 0.728 1.1 262.030 251 257 65 4 2.09 #VALUE! #VALUE!25 90 264.287 #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Avg. 200.46 87.0 0.57 0.7545 1.2 59.051 #DIV/0! 13179.5

Pre-Test Leak Check
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA

K = 846.72 x Dn^4 x H@ x Cp^2 x Md^2 x (MWd/MWs) x (Tm/Ts) x (Ps/Pm)

Plant Eramet Ambient Temperature 55Date 10/15/14 Barometric Pressure 30.03Location Marietta, OH Assumed Moisture % 3.7 Meter 0.001 @ 10 "HGOperator JC Probe Length, in. 60 Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H2OSource Furnace 1 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.223Run No. 3 Stack Diameter, in. 120Sample Box Probe Heater Setting 248Meter Box 609198 Oven Heat Setting 248 Post-Test Leak CheckMeter dH @ 1.837 Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Meter 0.001 @ 10 "HG Y = 0.941 Filter No. Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H20Time Start 12:20 Imp # 1

Time End 13:55 Static Pressure -0.47 O 2 20.5 CO2 0

Point Time T s T m dP Square dH Vm. Probe Oven Outlet Vacuum K ISO AFPM

No. (min) Root ft. Stream Factor Calc

1 "0" 195 79 0.60 0.7746 1.3 264.554 271 255 61 3 2.11 97.6 2974.22 3.8 195 82 0.62 0.7874 1.3 267.0 264 253 59 3 2.12 98.1 2854.03 7.5 196 87 0.57 0.755 1.2 269.4 252 258 55 3 2.13 92.9 3000.44 11.25 196 89 0.63 0.7937 1.3 271.8 251 258 52 3 2.14 93.2 2983.35 15 199 91 0.62 0.7874 1.3 274.3 250 255 50 4 2.14 102.1 2792.66 18.75 203 92 0.54 0.7348 1.2 276.7 252 257 49 4 2.13 96.2 2902.97 22.5 207 93 0.58 0.7616 1.2 279.1 247 247 48 4 2.12 98.4 2707.48 26.25 213 94 0.50 0.7071 1.1 281.4 245 256 48 4 2.11 94.3 2843.89 30 215 94 0.55 0.7416 1.2 283.7 250 254 47 4 2.10 105.0 2596.8

10 33.75 213 94 0.46 0.6782 1.0 286.0 252 259 48 4 2.11 102.9 2492.011 37.8 203 94 0.43 0.6557 0.9 288.2 250 251 48 4 2.14 93.1 2801.312 41.25 195 94 0.55 0.7416 1.2 290.5 249 255 47 4 2.16 77.5 2923.613 45 194 85 0.60 0.7746 1.3 292.5 250 251 53 4 2.13 109.8 2597.514 48.75 199 89 0.47 0.6856 1.0 294.9 248 250 49 3 2.13 89.9 2843.915 52.5 203 90 0.56 0.7483 1.2 297.1 250 267 50 4 2.12 108.9 2530.316 56.25 208 91 0.44 0.6633 0.9 299.5 246 259 50 3 2.11 94.6 2644.817 60 209 90 0.48 0.6928 1.0 301.7 247 265 50 3 2.10 89.9 2882.118 63.75 209 91 0.57 0.755 1.2 303.9 252 258 50 4 2.11 102.0 2732.319 67.5 212 92 0.51 0.7141 1.1 306.2 248 258 50 4 2.10 91.8 2916.020 71.25 213 91 0.58 0.7616 1.2 308.5 248 255 50 4 2.10 100.0 2793.621 75 216 91 0.53 0.728 1.1 310.9 249 258 50 4 2.09 100.0 2744.522 78.75 218 91 0.51 0.7141 1.1 313.2 251 258 51 4 2.08 90.5 2556.723 82.5 222 91 0.44 0.6633 0.9 315.2 252 251 51 3 2.07 106.6 2676.224 86.25 225 90 0.48 0.6928 1.0 317.6 252 257 51 3 2.06 #VALUE! #VALUE!25 90 319.738 #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE!38 _

Avg. 206.58 90.21 0.53 0.7297 1.1 55.184 -485.2 13291.0

Pre-Test Leak Check
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA

K = 846.72 x Dn^4 x H@ x Cp^2 x Md^2 x (MWd/MWs) x (Tm/Ts) x (Ps/Pm)

Plant Eramet Ambient Temperature 55Date 10/15/14 Barometric Pressure 30.03Location Marietta, OH Assumed Moisture % 3.7 Meter 0.001 @ 10 "HGOperator JC Probe Length, in. 60 Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H2OSource Furnace 1 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.223Run No. 4 Stack Diameter, in. 120Sample Box Probe Heater Setting 248Meter Box 609198 Oven Heat Setting 248 Post-Test Leak CheckMeter dH @ 1.837 Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Meter 0.001 @ 10 "HG Y = 0.941 Filter No. Pitot 0.0 @ 3 "H20Time Start 14:20 Imp # 1Time End 15:53 Static Pressure -0.47 O 2 20.5 CO2 0

Point Time T s T m dP Square dH Vm. Probe Oven Outlet Vacuum K ISO AFPM

No. (min) Root ft. Stream Factor Calc

1 "0" 186 75 0.56 0.7483 1.2 320.014 244 253 61 3 2.12 91.2 2970.52 3.8 183 76 0.63 0.7937 1.3 322.3 253 258 56 3 2.13 96.8 2918.53 7.5 181 79 0.61 0.781 1.3 324.8 249 258 54 3 2.15 106.3 2623.84 11.25 185 81 0.49 0.7 1.1 327.2 247 244 53 3 2.15 85.9 2998.75 15 185 81 0.64 0.8 1.4 329.5 245 252 54 5 2.15 100.8 2843.16 18.75 191 82 0.57 0.755 1.2 331.9 244 251 54 4 2.13 96.9 2894.77 22.5 192 83 0.59 0.7681 1.3 334.4 246 256 54 4 2.13 95.6 2908.08 26.25 187 83 0.60 0.7746 1.3 336.8 244 250 55 4 2.15 91.7 3035.79 30 181 84 0.66 0.8124 1.4 339.2 245 255 55 5 2.17 96.6 3049.1

10 33.75 177 85 0.67 0.8185 1.5 341.8 252 250 56 5 2.19 99.3 2966.011 37.8 171 86 0.64 0.8 1.4 344.4 245 249 57 5 2.21 100.2 2893.312 41.25 170 87 0.61 0.781 1.4 347.0 251 253 58 5 2.22 94.6 3000.013 45 166 81 0.66 0.8124 1.5 349.5 245 257 60 5 2.21 99.1 2916.914 48.75 170 84 0.62 0.7874 1.4 352.1 251 262 60 5 2.21 96.6 2949.715 52.5 174 86 0.63 0.7937 1.4 354.7 245 261 61 5 2.20 95.2 2977.716 56.25 176 87 0.64 0.8 1.4 357.2 244 252 63 5 2.20 96.1 2965.917 60 181 88 0.63 0.7937 1.4 359.7 252 258 64 5 2.19 106.4 2685.118 63.75 189 89 0.51 0.7141 1.1 362.3 244 260 60 4 2.17 90.3 2941.119 67.5 191 88 0.61 0.781 1.3 364.6 249 256 56 5 2.15 103.8 2728.020 71.25 197 89 0.52 0.7211 1.1 367.1 246 262 53 4 2.14 105.2 2567.721 75 198 89 0.46 0.6782 1.0 369.4 246 256 52 4 2.14 89.2 2809.922 78.75 199 89 0.55 0.7416 1.2 371.6 244 252 51 4 2.13 104.8 2573.623 82.5 201 89 0.46 0.6782 1.0 373.9 251 250 49 4 2.13 94.5 2716.024 86.25 204 89 0.51 0.7141 1.1 376.1 249 260 49 4 2.12 #VALUE! #VALUE!25 90 378.375 #DIV/0! #VALUE! #VALUE!38 _

Avg. 184.79 84.58 0.59 0.7645 1.3 58.361 -486.8 13696.0

Pre-Test Leak Check




MERCURY




APPENDIX C

ANALYTICAL DATA
PAHs
 5420 Mainway Drive, Unit 5, Burlington ON, L7L 6A4

 Phone: 905-331-3111, FAX: 905-331-4567

ALS Project Contact: Ron McLeod Client Name: Environmental Quality Management Inc

ALS Project ID: EQM100 Client Address: 1800 Carillon Boulevard

ALS WO#: L1535265 Cincinnati, OH 45240

Date of Report: 18-Nov-14

Date of Sample Receipt: 20-Oct-14 Client Contact: Tom Gerstle

Client Project ID: 050352.0031 Eramet

COMMENTS: PAH via modified CARB 429

The method blank was lost during laboratory processing and has not been reported. The field blank serves as an indication that the sample data

are not impacted by significant laboratory background.

Selected targets from selected samples have been reported from the analysis of diluted extracts that have been re-spiked with quantification

standard. As a result, these data are not calculated by isotope dilution and are not inherently recovery-corrected. Reported extraction standard

recoveries for these targets are not indicative of extraction efficiency as they have been spiked after extraction.

S.Kennedy 18-Nov-14

Certified by:

Whitney Davis

Account Manager 

Results in this certificate relate only to the samples as submitted to the laboratory.

This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of ALS Canada Ltd.

Certificate of Analysis

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 1 of 16
Sample Name BLANK ACETONE/

HEXANE/METH.

BLANK

FIELD BLANK MAIN BAGHOUSE

RUN#1

MAIN BAGHOUSE

RUN#2

ALS Sample ID L1535265-11 L1535265-4 L1535265-3 L1535265-1 L1535265-2

Sample Size 11111

Sample units sample train train train train

Moisture Content n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Matrix XAD Trap Stack Stack Stack Stack

Sampling Date 22-Oct-14 14-Oct-14 14-Oct-14 15-Oct-14 15-Oct-14

Extraction Date 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14

Target Analytes ng ng ng ng ng

Naphthalene 103 2260 9270 471000 458000

2-Me-Naphthalene 12.3 4860 17900 74800 103000

1-Me-Naphthalene 10.2 3910 13600 55200 74800

Acenaphthylene 1.55 157 395 153000 188000

Acenaphthene 1.42 450 1180 32000 43400

Fluorene 6.27 648 1620 70200 121000

Phenanthrene 13.5 3380 12200 2020000 1590000

Anthracene 3.04 140 556 343000 203000

Fluoranthene 1.92 118 554 3620000 4790000

Pyrene 2.97 69.2 522 2600000 3550000

Benz[a]anthracene 4.46 7.33 96.8 268000 570000

Chrysene/Triphenylene 3.33 29.9 225 473000 1250000

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 4.90 614 187 141000 419000

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 2.88 524 51.7 41100 112000

Benzo[e]pyrene 1.74 4.47 109 51900 149000

Benzo[a]pyrene 2.59 <1.8 45.3 22600 60300

Perylene 1.55 <1.3 5.05 4080 8800

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7.92 4.63 30.0 8370 22900

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 7.65 1.66 12.4 1190 4120

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 6.20 3.17 57.1 7330 17700

Field Spike Standards % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec

Fluorene-d10 76 n/s 96 111 145

p-Terphenyl-d14 48 n/s 106 73 65

Extraction Standards % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 72 83 80 100 83

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 63 84 78 99 67

Acenaphthylene-d8 49 85 81 113 60

Phenanthrene-d10 38 83 85 73 94

Anthracene-d10 40 71 71 78 95

Fluoranthene-d10 45 90 87 81 95

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 20 101 122 66 78

Chrysene-d12 22 75 93 71 79

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 36 103 98 70 94

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 34 77 71 74 99

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 36 74 66 71 90

Perylene-d12 36 75 69 74 92

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 27 88 97 66 92

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 25 89 100 64 91

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 30 86 89 73 101

ALS Environmental

Sample Analysis Summary Report

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 2 of 16
Sample Name MAIN BAGHOUSE

RUN#3

MAIN BAGHOUSE

RUN#4

FURNACE 12

RUN#1

FURNACE 12

RUN#2

FURNACE 12

RUN#3

FURNACE 12

RUN#4

ALS Sample ID L1535265-5 L1535265-6 L1535265-7 L1535265-8 L1535265-9 L1535265-10

Sample Size 111111

Sample units train train train train train train

Moisture Content n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Matrix Stack Stack Stack Stack Stack Stack

Sampling Date 15-Oct-14 15-Oct-14 16-Oct-14 16-Oct-14 16-Oct-14 16-Oct-14

Extraction Date 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14 28-Oct-14

Target Analytes ng ng ng ng ng ng

Naphthalene 326000 347000 41700 20200 44100 43900

2-Me-Naphthalene 53700 71100 14100 13900 18300 16400

1-Me-Naphthalene 41000 49900 9600 10400 13200 11700

Acenaphthylene 75000 129000 14800 3670 15000 19100

Acenaphthene 19400 20900 1780 1620 2330 2050

Fluorene 41500 70100 2740 2370 3500 3080

Phenanthrene 1590000 1370000 36400 22200 74000 43500

Anthracene 208000 167000 8620 3610 13200 10500

Fluoranthene 4100000 2070000 36800 11800 64500 30400

Pyrene 2990000 1430000 26800 7950 46900 23100

Benz[a]anthracene 707000 177000 3530 3350 3510 3290

Chrysene/Triphenylene 1480000 461000 13800 9990 10600 5200

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 614000 178000 5170 5290 5060 3160

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207000 59300 1950 2630 1880 1250

Benzo[e]pyrene 233000 75000 2540 2770 2150 1660

Benzo[a]pyrene 121000 30000 831 457 510 681

Perylene 20600 6220 107 87.8 60.4 133

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 40300 11200 1060 1170 651 980

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 5890 1980 207 324 129 204

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 27600 8400 821 751 528 807

Field Spike Standards % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec

Fluorene-d10 104 125 118 109 114 104

p-Terphenyl-d14 87 85 115 85 113 85

Extraction Standards % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 97 103 68 90 105 95

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 116 90 71 91 70 71

Acenaphthylene-d8 104 92 75 88 72 68

Phenanthrene-d10 81 81 108 81 105 77

Anthracene-d10 84 86 103 99 109 81

Fluoranthene-d10 84 87 120 103 102 87

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 71 73 108 64 103 44

Chrysene-d12 73 78 71 48 74 35

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 79 80 96 87 95 67

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 86 81 72 57 94 54

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 82 78 73 78 72 56

Perylene-d12 81 80 76 81 74 57

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 70 76 92 90 97 58

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 72 73 95 91 101 56

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 80 85 92 91 95 55

ALS Environmental

Sample Analysis Summary Report

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 3 of 16
Sample Name Laboratory Control

Sample

ALS Sample ID WG1980014-2

Sample Size 1

Sample units n/a

Moisture Content n/a

Matrix QC

Sampling Date n/a

Extraction Date 28-Oct-14

Target Analytes % Rec

Naphthalene 123

2-Me-Naphthalene

1-Me-Naphthalene

Acenaphthylene 98

Acenaphthene 103

Fluorene 105

Phenanthrene 99

Anthracene 101

Fluoranthene 102

Pyrene 92

Benz[a]anthracene 103

Chrysene/Triphenylene 97

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 109

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 103

Benzo[e]pyrene

Benzo[a]pyrene 89

Perylene

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 111

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 104

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 104

Field Spike Standards % Rec

Fluorene-d10 n/s

p-Terphenyl-d14 n/s

Extraction Standards % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 85

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 81

Acenaphthylene-d8 84

Phenanthrene-d10 80

Anthracene-d10 74

Fluoranthene-d10 91

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 56

Chrysene-d12 50

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 85

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 79

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 75

Perylene-d12 79

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 79

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 80

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 81

ALS Environmental

Sample Analysis Summary Report

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 4 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-11 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1

Filename 4-141115A15

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1

Analysis Units ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng

Naphthalene 7:33 103 1.3 M

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:44 12.3 0.25 M J

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:54 10.2 0.26 M J

Acenaphthylene 10:10 1.55 0.072 M J

Acenaphthene 10:27 1.42 0.22 J

Fluorene 11:18 6.27 0.48 M J

Phenanthrene 12:51 13.5 0.40 M J

Anthracene 12:56 3.04 0.52 M J

Fluoranthene 14:47 1.92 0.38 M J

Pyrene 15:09 2.97 0.36 M J

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 4.46 0.22 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:37 3.33 0.22 M J

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 4.90 0.64 M J

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 2.88 0.69 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:14 1.74 0.75 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 2.59 0.78 M J

Perylene 20:30 1.55 0.60 M J

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:22 7.92 1.4 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:26 7.65 1.3 M J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:46 6.20 0.74 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits

Fluorene-d10 11:15 76 50-150

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 48 50-150

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits

Naphthalene-d8 7:31 72 20-150

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 63 20-150

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:08 49 20-150

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 38 30-150

Anthracene-d10 12:53 40 30-150

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 45 30-150

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 20 30-150

Chrysene-d12 17:33 22 30-150

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 36 30-150

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 34 30-150

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:17 36 30-150

Perylene-d12 20:27 36 30-150

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:20 27 30-150

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:23 25 30-150

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:44 30 30-150

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

XAD Trap 10

BLANK

CARB 429 Modified sample

n/a

1

Sample Analysis Report

15-Nov-14 20:44

ALS Environmental

22-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

17-Nov-2014

Flags

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 5 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-4 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1

Filename 4-141115A16

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1

Analysis Units ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng

Naphthalene 7:33 2260 16 M

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:42 4860 7.2

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:52 3910 7.6

Acenaphthylene 10:09 157 1.4 M

Acenaphthene 10:26 450 3.4 M

Fluorene 11:17 648 1.6 M

Phenanthrene 12:50 3380 2.2 M

Anthracene 12:55 140 2.6 M

Fluoranthene 14:46 118 0.92 M

Pyrene 15:09 69.2 0.86 M J

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 7.33 0.40 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:35 29.9 0.43 M J

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:45 614 1.3 M

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 524 1.6 M

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:15 4.47 1.7 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene NotFnd <1.8 1.8 M U

Perylene NotFnd <1.3 1.3 M U

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:22 4.63 0.90 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:26 1.66 0.45 M J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:46 3.17 0.55 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits

Fluorene-d10 11:14 n/s 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 n/s 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits

Naphthalene-d8 7:31 83 20-150

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:39 84 20-150

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:08 85 20-150

Phenanthrene-d10 12:47 83 30-150

Anthracene-d10 12:52 71 30-150

Fluoranthene-d10 14:44 90 30-150

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 101 30-150

Chrysene-d12 17:32 75 30-150

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:40 103 30-150

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 77 30-150

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:17 74 30-150

Perylene-d12 20:27 75 30-150

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:19 88 30-150

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:22 89 30-150

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:44 86 30-150

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

U Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

n/s Indicates that this standard has not been spiked.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Flags

10

ACETONE/HEXANE/METH. BLANK

15-Nov-14 21:18

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

1

ALS Environmental

14-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Sample Analysis Report

Stack 17-Nov-2014

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 6 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-3 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1

Filename 4-141115A17

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1

Analysis Units ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng

Naphthalene 7:35 9270 39 M

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:43 17900 2.5

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:53 13600 2.6

Acenaphthylene 10:10 395 1.4 M

Acenaphthene 10:27 1180 6.5 M

Fluorene 11:17 1620 2.9 M

Phenanthrene 12:50 12200 8.3 M

Anthracene 12:55 556 10 M

Fluoranthene 14:47 554 1.8 M

Pyrene 15:09 522 1.7 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 96.8 1.2 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:36 225 1.3 M

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:43 187 0.61 M

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:46 51.7 0.70 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:14 109 0.85 M

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:20 45.3 0.89 M J

Perylene 20:30 5.05 0.61 M J

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:22 30.0 2.1 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:26 12.4 0.98 M J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:47 57.1 1.4 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits

Fluorene-d10 11:14 96 50-150

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 106 50-150

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits

Naphthalene-d8 7:33 80 20-150

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 78 20-150

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:08 81 20-150

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 85 30-150

Anthracene-d10 12:53 71 30-150

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 87 30-150

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 122 30-150

Chrysene-d12 17:32 93 30-150

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:40 98 30-150

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 71 30-150

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:17 66 30-150

Perylene-d12 20:27 69 30-150

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:19 97 30-150

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:22 100 30-150

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:43 89 30-150

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Stack 10

FIELD BLANK

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

1

Sample Analysis Report

15-Nov-14 21:52

ALS Environmental

14-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

17-Nov-2014

Flags

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 7 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-1 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Filename 4-141115B17 4-141115B04 4-141115A19

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL 1000 uL 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1 10 100

Analysis Units ng ng ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng Time. ng ng Time. ng ng

Naphthalene 7:33 471000 390 7:34 604000 1400 7:34 686000 5800 M

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:43 74800 58 M 8:43 117000 170 8:43 141000 4100 J

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:52 55200 60 M 8:52 94800 180 8:52 126000 4300 J

Acenaphthylene 10:10 153000 19 M 10:10 255000 360 M 10:09 238000 1800 M J

Acenaphthene 10:27 32000 130 M 10:27 53700 530 M 10:27 44400 2500 M J

Fluorene 11:18 70200 110 M 11:19 102000 450 M 11:18 104000 2400 M J

Phenanthrene 12:50 1130000 93 M E 12:50 2020000 130 M 12:50 1970000 2600 M

Anthracene 12:55 129000 96 M 12:55 343000 150 M 12:55 385000 3300 M J

Fluoranthene 14:47 2000000 260 M E 14:47 3620000 1600 M 14:46 3810000 3600 M

Pyrene 15:10 1670000 250 M E 15:09 2600000 1500 M 15:09 2780000 3300 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:33 153000 99 M 17:32 268000 1200 M 17:32 220000 3700 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:36 314000 100 M 17:36 473000 1100 M 17:36 470000 3200 M J

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 79700 90 M 19:44 141000 340 M 19:44 116000 1100 M J

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 36200 92 M 19:46 41100 380 M J 19:46 51100 1100 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:15 10800 26 M 20:14 51900 390 M 20:14 53600 1200 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 5150 28 M 20:21 22600 410 M J 20:21 23300 1200 M J

Perylene 20:31 2500 48 M J 20:30 4080 300 M J 20:31 6630 710 M J

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene NotFnd <34000 34000 M U 22:22 8370 380 M J 22:22 8760 3000 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:27 885 220 M J 22:26 1190 250 M J 22:28 3790 2300 M J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:48 4620 120 M J 22:46 7330 190 M J 22:47 7050 1500 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits % Rec % Rec

Fluorene-d10 11:15 111 50-150 11:15 141 11:15 222 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 73 50-150 15:34 158 15:34 59 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits % Rec % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 7:32 100 20-150 7:32 77 7:32 80 

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 99 20-150 8:40 70 8:40 68 

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:08 113 20-150 10:08 75 10:08 80 

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 119 30-150 12:48 73 12:48 64 

Anthracene-d10 12:53 128 30-150 12:53 78 12:53 63 

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 131 30-150 14:45 81 14:45 67 

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:30 66 30-150 17:29 66 17:29 52 

Chrysene-d12 17:33 57 30-150 17:32 71 17:33 73 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 121 30-150 19:41 70 19:40 67 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 100 30-150 19:44 74 19:44 67 

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:18 316 30-150 20:17 71 20:18 73 

Perylene-d12 20:28 147 30-150 20:27 74 20:27 70 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:15 76 30-150 22:20 66 22:20 65 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:25 37 M 30-150 22:23 64 22:24 61 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:45 105 30-150 22:44 73 22:44 83 

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

U Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

E Indicates that this compound was detected above the calibrated range.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Flags Flags

16-Nov-14 03:35 15-Nov-14 23:01

500

MAIN BAGHOUSE RUN#1

16-Nov-14 11:01

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

1

ALS Environmental

15-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Flags

Sample Analysis Report

Stack 17-Nov-2014

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 8 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-2 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Filename 4-141115B18 4-141115B05 4-141115A20

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL 1000 uL 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1 10 100

Analysis Units ng ng ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng Time. ng ng Time. ng ng

Naphthalene 7:34 458000 240 M 7:34 437000 700 7:35 570000 4400 M

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:43 103000 36 8:43 79900 180 8:44 107000 2800 J

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:52 74800 38 8:53 65500 190 8:53 83800 2900 J

Acenaphthylene 10:10 188000 110 M 10:10 156000 500 M 10:09 147000 830 M J

Acenaphthene 10:27 43400 52 M 10:27 32900 120 J 10:28 32700 1100 M J

Fluorene 11:19 121000 140 M 11:19 57300 120 M 11:18 71300 1900 M J

Phenanthrene 12:50 2480000 220 M E 12:50 1590000 790 M 12:51 1600000 2300 M

Anthracene 12:55 205000 250 M 12:55 203000 970 M 12:55 261000 3300 M J

Fluoranthene 14:47 5300000 450 M E 14:47 4790000 1900 M 14:47 4050000 570 M

Pyrene 15:10 4720000 420 M E 15:10 3550000 1700 M 15:09 3210000 530 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 1120000 670 M E 17:32 570000 370 M 17:32 466000 2500 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:36 2400000 600 M E 17:36 1250000 350 M 17:32 536000 2800 M

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 776000 180 M E 19:44 419000 440 M 19:44 400000 3700 M J

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 152000 120 M 19:47 112000 480 M 19:47 126000 4300 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:15 88000 41 M 20:14 149000 540 M 20:15 142000 4000 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 38700 43 M 20:20 60300 560 M 20:21 71400 4200 M J

Perylene 20:31 16200 95 M 20:30 8800 440 M J 20:30 5550 3100 M J

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:23 46800 150 M 22:22 22900 620 M J 22:22 26600 3600 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:27 8480 210 M 22:27 4120 200 M J 22:27 5290 2200 M J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:48 29100 140 M 22:46 17700 320 M J 22:46 18000 1600 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits % Rec % Rec

Fluorene-d10 11:15 175 50-150 11:15 145 11:16 60 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:35 173 50-150 15:35 65 15:36 186 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits % Rec % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 7:32 83 20-150 7:32 94 7:32 97 

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 67 20-150 8:40 98 8:40 87 

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:08 60 20-150 10:08 88 10:08 93 

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 54 30-150 12:48 94 12:48 78 

Anthracene-d10 12:53 52 30-150 12:53 95 12:53 84 

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 52 30-150 14:45 95 14:45 102 

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 27 30-150 17:29 78 17:30 80 

Chrysene-d12 17:33 28 30-150 17:32 79 17:30 48 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 47 M 30-150 19:40 94 19:41 79 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 68 M 30-150 19:44 99 19:44 85 

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:18 136 M 30-150 20:17 90 20:18 86 

Perylene-d12 20:28 50 M 30-150 20:27 92 20:27 88 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:21 33 M 30-150 22:19 92 22:20 87 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:25 33 M 30-150 22:23 91 22:23 81 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:45 39 M 30-150 22:44 101 22:44 111 

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

E Indicates that this compound was detected above the calibrated range.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Stack 500

MAIN BAGHOUSE RUN#2

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

1

Sample Analysis Report

16-Nov-14 11:36

ALS Environmental

15-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

17-Nov-2014

Flags Flags Flags

16-Nov-14 04:10 15-Nov-14 23:35

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 9 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-5 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Filename 4-141115B19 4-141115B06 4-141115A21

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL 1000 uL 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1 10 100

Analysis Units ng ng ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng Time. ng ng Time. ng ng

Naphthalene 7:34 326000 97 7:33 445000 860 7:34 530000 11000

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:44 53700 19 8:43 88100 440 8:44 106000 2900 J

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:53 41000 20 8:52 65400 460 8:53 93800 3100 J

Acenaphthylene 10:11 75000 59 10:09 125000 270 M 10:10 120000 1900 M J

Acenaphthene 10:27 19400 19 M 10:26 26600 340 M J 10:27 25900 2000 M J

Fluorene 11:18 41500 65 M 11:18 58100 310 M 11:19 60300 2200 M J

Phenanthrene 12:50 1090000 97 M E 12:49 1590000 130 M 12:51 1570000 7600 M

Anthracene 12:55 95500 110 M 12:54 208000 160 M 12:55 358000 12000 M J

Fluoranthene 14:47 2300000 140 M E 14:46 4100000 620 M 14:47 3340000 7500 M

Pyrene 15:10 1940000 130 M E 15:09 2990000 580 M 15:10 2600000 7000 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 584000 51 M 17:31 707000 200 M 17:33 640000 2000 M

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:37 1290000 47 M E 17:35 1480000 190 M 17:36 1640000 1800 M

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 481000 89 M E 19:44 614000 320 M 19:44 634000 4400 M

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 164000 86 M 19:45 207000 320 M 19:47 206000 5000 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:15 72900 35 M 20:14 233000 380 M 20:15 245000 5600 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 38500 36 M 20:20 121000 390 M 20:21 126000 5800 M J

Perylene 20:31 16800 82 20:30 20600 290 M J 20:31 23900 3900 M J

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:23 27200 310 M 22:21 40300 490 M J 22:23 30300 4500 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:27 5510 200 M 22:26 5890 260 M J 22:28 7220 3400 M J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:48 16000 200 M 22:46 27600 250 M J 22:47 25500 2000 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits % Rec % Rec

Fluorene-d10 11:15 104 50-150 11:14 131 11:15 142 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:35 87 50-150 15:34 176 15:37 67 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits % Rec % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 7:32 97 20-150 7:31 85 7:32 94 

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 116 20-150 8:40 86 8:40 78 

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:09 104 20-150 10:08 81 10:09 84 

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 119 30-150 12:47 81 12:48 75 

Anthracene-d10 12:53 105 30-150 12:53 84 12:54 69 

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 109 30-150 14:44 84 14:45 93 

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 80 30-150 17:28 71 17:30 69 

Chrysene-d12 17:33 71 30-150 17:32 73 17:33 81 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 105 M 30-150 19:40 79 19:41 73 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 99 M 30-150 19:44 86 19:45 80 

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:17 233 M 30-150 20:17 82 20:18 80 

Perylene-d12 20:23 90 M 30-150 20:27 81 20:28 83 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:21 87 30-150 22:19 70 22:20 76 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:25 70 30-150 22:22 72 22:24 70 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:45 121 30-150 22:43 80 22:44 85 

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

E Indicates that this compound was detected above the calibrated range.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Flags Flags

16-Nov-14 04:44 16-Nov-14 00:09

500

MAIN BAGHOUSE RUN#3

16-Nov-14 12:10

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

1

ALS Environmental

15-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Flags

Sample Analysis Report

Stack 17-Nov-2014

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 10 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-6 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1 Run 2

Filename 4-141115B20 4-141115B07

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1 10

Analysis Units ng ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng Time. ng ng

Naphthalene 7:33 347000 200 7:34 487000 820

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:43 71100 31 8:44 88700 190

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:52 49900 33 8:52 67900 190

Acenaphthylene 10:09 129000 28 M 10:09 188000 360 M

Acenaphthene 10:27 20900 120 M 10:27 29500 170 M J

Fluorene 11:18 70100 39 M 11:19 83400 230 M

Phenanthrene 12:50 1320000 100 M E 12:51 1370000 260 M

Anthracene 12:54 104000 120 M 12:55 167000 330 M

Fluoranthene 14:47 1820000 74 M E 14:47 2070000 810 M

Pyrene 15:09 1460000 69 M E 15:09 1430000 750 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 176000 92 M 17:32 177000 230 M

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:36 394000 79 M 17:36 461000 220 M

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 158000 440 M 19:44 178000 240 M

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:46 59100 510 M 19:46 59300 250 M

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:14 35200 240 M 20:15 75000 270 M

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 14500 240 M 20:21 30000 280 M J

Perylene 20:30 3510 340 M J 20:30 6220 220 M J

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:23 12800 120 M 22:22 11200 280 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:28 1900 97 M J 22:26 1980 240 J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:48 9830 68 M 22:47 8400 140 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Fluorene-d10 11:15 125 50-150 11:16 159 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 85 50-150 15:34 34 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 7:31 103 20-150 7:32 86 

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 90 20-150 8:40 84 

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:08 92 20-150 10:08 81 

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 92 30-150 12:48 81 

Anthracene-d10 12:53 92 30-150 12:53 86 

Fluoranthene-d10 14:44 95 30-150 14:45 87 

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 52 30-150 17:29 73 

Chrysene-d12 17:32 53 30-150 17:33 78 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 81 M 30-150 19:41 80 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 74 M 30-150 19:44 81 

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:20 142 M 30-150 20:17 78 

Perylene-d12 20:27 104 M 30-150 20:27 80 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:21 52 30-150 22:19 76 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:24 51 30-150 22:23 73 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:45 57 30-150 22:44 85 

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

E Indicates that this compound was detected above the calibrated range.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Stack 500

MAIN BAGHOUSE RUN#4

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

1

Sample Analysis Report

16-Nov-14 12:44

ALS Environmental

15-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

17-Nov-2014

Flags Flags

16-Nov-14 05:18

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 11 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-7 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1 Run 2

Filename 4-141115B12 4-141115B08

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1 50

Analysis Units ng ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng Time. ng ng

Naphthalene 7:34 41700 41 M 7:33 37700 61 M

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:43 14100 17 8:43 14500 11

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:53 9600 18 8:52 12700 11

Acenaphthylene 10:10 14800 2.9 M 10:10 12100 26 M

Acenaphthene 10:27 1780 1.5 M 10:27 1950 34 M J

Fluorene 11:18 2740 15 M 11:19 2540 49 M J

Phenanthrene 12:50 30000 6.6 M E 12:51 36400 15 M

Anthracene 12:55 4750 7.3 M 12:56 8620 21 M

Fluoranthene 14:47 38100 7.9 M E 14:47 36800 26 M

Pyrene 15:10 31400 7.4 M E 15:09 26800 24 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 3530 3.7 M 17:33 2190 53 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:36 13800 4.0 M 17:33 2520 61 M J

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 5170 1.4 M 19:45 4060 18 M J

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 1950 1.5 M 19:47 2940 24 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:15 2540 1.8 M 20:15 842 5.5 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 831 1.8 M 20:22 108 5.7 M J

Perylene 20:31 107 1.4 M 20:30 85.2 12 M J

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:22 1060 0.62 M 22:25 1040 26 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:26 207 0.83 M 22:27 216 28 M J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:47 821 0.36 M 22:48 579 14 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Fluorene-d10 11:15 118 50-150 11:15 94 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 115 50-150 15:35 78 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 7:32 68 20-150 7:31 119 

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:41 71 20-150 8:40 100 

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:09 75 20-150 10:08 108 

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 79 30-150 12:48 108 

Anthracene-d10 12:53 69 30-150 12:53 103 

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 82 30-150 14:45 120 

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 108 30-150 17:30 67 

Chrysene-d12 17:33 71 30-150 17:30 41 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 96 30-150 19:42 103 M 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 72 30-150 19:46 74 M 

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:17 73 30-150 20:17 354 M 

Perylene-d12 20:27 76 30-150 20:28 101 M 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:20 92 30-150 22:21 67 M 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:23 95 30-150 22:24 26 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:44 92 30-150 22:45 113 

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

E Indicates that this compound was detected above the calibrated range.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Flags

16-Nov-14 05:52

10

FURNACE 12 RUN#1

16-Nov-14 08:10

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

1

ALS Environmental

16-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Flags

Sample Analysis Report

Stack 17-Nov-2014

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 12 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-8 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1 Run 2

Filename 4-141115B13 4-141115B09

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1 50

Analysis Units ng ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng Time. ng ng

Naphthalene 7:34 26400 63 E 7:33 20200 200

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:44 13900 3.4 8:43 13200 18

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:53 10400 3.5 8:52 12600 19

Acenaphthylene 10:10 3670 3.2 M 10:09 3480 18 M J

Acenaphthene 10:28 1620 1.9 10:26 1630 16 M J

Fluorene 11:18 2370 5.3 M 11:17 2860 34 M J

Phenanthrene 12:51 22700 7.8 M E 12:51 22200 63 M

Anthracene 12:55 1820 9.8 M 12:54 3610 76 M J

Fluoranthene 14:47 11800 4.1 M 14:47 10700 4.5

Pyrene 15:10 7950 3.8 M 15:10 8380 4.2 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 3350 4.7 M 17:34 3330 11 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:37 9990 5.0 M 17:37 9600 8.7 M

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 5460 3.2 M E 19:44 5290 34 M

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 1600 3.6 M 19:48 2630 39 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:15 2770 4.9 M 20:14 1560 8.0 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 457 5.1 M 20:21 132 8.3 M J

Perylene 20:31 87.8 3.6 M J 20:30 163 17 M J

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:23 1170 3.8 M 22:24 816 52 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:26 324 1.3 M 22:26 95.0 54 J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:48 751 2.2 M 22:48 856 37 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Fluorene-d10 11:15 109 50-150 11:14 117 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 85 50-150 15:34 93 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 7:32 84 20-150 7:31 90 

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:41 91 20-150 8:40 83 

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:09 88 20-150 10:08 91 

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 91 30-150 12:48 81 

Anthracene-d10 12:53 76 30-150 12:53 99 

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 103 30-150 14:45 100 

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 64 30-150 17:30 40 

Chrysene-d12 17:33 48 30-150 17:33 56 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 104 30-150 19:42 87 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 93 30-150 19:42 57 

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:18 78 30-150 20:18 158 M 

Perylene-d12 20:27 81 30-150 20:27 46 M 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:20 90 30-150 22:21 53 M 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:23 91 30-150 22:27 49 M 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:44 91 30-150 22:45 60 M 

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

E Indicates that this compound was detected above the calibrated range.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Stack 10

FURNACE 12 RUN#2

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

1

Sample Analysis Report

16-Nov-14 08:44

ALS Environmental

16-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

17-Nov-2014

Flags Flags

16-Nov-14 06:27

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 13 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-9 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1 Run 2

Filename 4-141115B15 4-141115B14

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1 50

Analysis Units ng ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng Time. ng ng

Naphthalene 7:35 42000 51 E 7:33 44100 190 M

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:43 18300 2.9 8:43 16000 19

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:53 13200 3.0 8:52 13700 19

Acenaphthylene 10:10 15000 3.8 M 10:09 12700 10 M

Acenaphthene 10:27 2330 1.4 M 10:27 2570 31 M J

Fluorene 11:18 3500 8.0 M 11:18 4220 32 M J

Phenanthrene 12:50 36200 4.3 M E 12:50 74000 25 M

Anthracene 12:55 5970 4.6 M 12:56 13200 31 M

Fluoranthene 14:47 43800 12 M E 14:47 64500 58 M

Pyrene 15:10 37700 11 M E 15:09 46900 54 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:33 3510 1.3 M 17:33 2180 20 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:36 10600 1.5 M 17:36 9520 18 M

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 5080 1.2 M E 19:45 5060 60 M

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 1310 1.3 M 19:47 1880 50 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:15 2150 1.5 M 20:14 959 59 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 510 1.5 M 20:22 189 62 M J

Perylene 20:31 60.4 1.1 M J 20:31 <220 220 M U

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:22 651 0.74 M 22:23 597 44 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:26 129 1.2 M 22:28 198 57 M J

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:47 528 0.45 M 22:48 505 22 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Fluorene-d10 11:15 114 50-150 11:15 135 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 113 50-150 15:34 103 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 7:32 65 20-150 7:31 105 

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 70 20-150 8:40 110 

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:09 72 20-150 10:08 104 

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 77 30-150 12:48 105 

Anthracene-d10 12:54 69 30-150 12:53 109 

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 80 30-150 14:45 102 

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 103 30-150 17:29 72 

Chrysene-d12 17:33 74 30-150 17:33 81 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 85 30-150 19:41 95 M 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:45 69 30-150 19:45 94 M 

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:18 72 30-150 20:16 268 M 

Perylene-d12 20:27 74 30-150 20:27 115 M 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:20 97 30-150 22:21 91 M 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:23 101 30-150 22:25 56 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:44 95 30-150 22:44 116 M 

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

U Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

E Indicates that this compound was detected above the calibrated range.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Flags

16-Nov-14 09:18

10

FURNACE 12 RUN#3

16-Nov-14 09:53

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

1

ALS Environmental

16-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Flags

Sample Analysis Report

Stack 17-Nov-2014

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 14 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID L1535265-10 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type Sample Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1 Run 2

Filename 4-141115B16 4-141115B11

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1 50

Analysis Units ng ng

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926 HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret. Conc. EDL Ret. Conc. EDL

Target Analytes Time ng ng Time. ng ng

Naphthalene 7:34 43100 43 E 7:33 43900 93 M

2-Me-Naphthalene 8:44 16400 3.9 M 8:42 15100 38 M

1-Me-Naphthalene 8:54 11700 4.0 M 8:52 13500 40 M

Acenaphthylene 10:10 19100 2.9 M 10:09 14900 28 M

Acenaphthene 10:27 2050 5.8 M 10:27 2350 30 M J

Fluorene 11:18 3080 2.0 M 11:17 3650 15 M J

Phenanthrene 12:50 34100 11 M E 12:50 43500 56 M

Anthracene 12:55 6300 11 M 12:55 10500 71 M

Fluoranthene 14:47 38400 14 M E 14:46 30400 78 M

Pyrene 15:10 25600 13 M E 15:09 23100 72 M

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 3290 1.1 M 17:35 4350 86 M J

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:36 5200 1.1 M 17:35 5000 99 M

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:44 3160 2.8 M 19:45 3470 160 M J

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 1250 3.2 M 19:47 1470 170 M J

Benzo[e]pyrene 20:15 1660 3.7 M 20:14 1140 42 M J

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:21 681 3.8 M 20:23 160 43 M J

Perylene 20:31 133 2.9 M 20:31 <40 40 M U

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:22 980 1.7 M 22:24 707 81 M J

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:27 204 2.7 M 22:29 <140 140 M U

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:47 807 1.0 M 22:48 868 48 M J

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Fluorene-d10 11:15 104 50-150 11:14 113 

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 85 50-150 15:34 85 

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits % Rec

Naphthalene-d8 7:32 69 20-150 7:31 95 

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 71 20-150 8:40 87 

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:09 68 20-150 10:08 87 

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 66 30-150 12:48 77 

Anthracene-d10 12:54 59 30-150 12:53 81 

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 69 30-150 14:44 87 

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 44 30-150 17:30 36 

Chrysene-d12 17:33 35 30-150 17:30 22 

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:41 67 30-150 19:41 56 

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:45 54 30-150 19:45 43 

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:18 56 30-150 20:21 111 

Perylene-d12 20:28 57 30-150 20:27 151 

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:20 58 30-150 22:22 37 M 

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:23 56 30-150 22:27 25 M 

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:44 55 30-150 22:45 42 M 

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample.

M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

U Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

E Indicates that this compound was detected above the calibrated range.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL.

Stack 10

FURNACE 12 RUN#4

CARB 429 Modified train

n/a

1

Sample Analysis Report

16-Nov-14 10:27

ALS Environmental

16-Oct-14

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

17-Nov-2014

Flags Flags

16-Nov-14 07:35

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 15 of 16
Sample Name Sampling Date

ALS Sample ID WG1980014-2 Extraction Date

Analysis Method Sample Size

Analysis Type LCS Moisture Content

Sample Matrix Split Ratio

Run Information Run 1

Filename 4-141115A10

Run Date

Final Volume 1000 uL

Dilution Factor 1

Analysis Units %

Instrument - Column HRMS-4 Rxi5Sil1117926

Ret.

Target Analytes Time % Rec Limits

Naphthalene 7:34 123 50-150

2-Me-Naphthalene

1-Me-Naphthalene

Acenaphthylene 10:10 98 50-150

Acenaphthene 10:27 103 50-150

Fluorene 11:18 105 50-150

Phenanthrene 12:50 99 50-150

Anthracene 12:55 101 50-150

Fluoranthene 14:47 102 50-150

Pyrene 15:10 92 50-150

Benz[a]anthracene 17:32 103 50-150

Chrysene/Triphenylene 17:36 97 50-150

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19:43 109 50-150

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19:47 103 50-150

Benzo[e]pyrene

Benzo[a]pyrene 20:20 89 50-150

Perylene

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 22:21 111 50-150

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 22:26 104 50-150

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22:46 104 50-150

Field Spike Standards % Rec Limits

Fluorene-d10 11:15 n/s

p-Terphenyl-d14 15:34 n/s

Extraction Standards % Rec Limits

Naphthalene-d8 7:32 85 20-150

2-Me-Naphthalene-d10 8:40 81 20-150

Acenaphthylene-d8 10:08 84 20-150

Phenanthrene-d10 12:48 80 30-150

Anthracene-d10 12:53 74 30-150

Fluoranthene-d10 14:45 91 30-150

Benz[a]anthracene-d12 17:29 56 30-150

Chrysene-d12 17:33 50 30-150

Benzo[b]fluoranthene-d12 19:40 85 30-150

Benzo[k]fluoranthene-d12 19:44 79 30-150

Benzo[a]pyrene-d12 20:17 75 30-150

Perylene-d12 20:27 79 30-150

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene-d12 22:19 79 30-150

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene-d14 22:22 80 30-150

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d12 22:44 81 30-150

n/s Indicates that this standard has not been spiked.

Flags

1

Laboratory Control Sample

15-Nov-14 17:53

Ella Gdyczynski

--e-signature--

1

ALS Environmental

n/a

28-Oct-14 Approved:

Laboratory Control Sample Analysis Report

QC 17-Nov-2014

CARB 429 Modified

n/a

ALS Canada Ltd L1535265 141118 Page 16 of 16












MERCURY
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

Project Number 2003010

Client Name Environmental Quality Management, Inc. Date

Contact Name Phone

Trap I.D. Site/Source Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Mass ng 

Sect. 3

Spike 

Level 

% Spike 

Recovery Comments

230566 Eramet MB r1 s 10/28/2014 John Perko 12642.00 4.41 3800

230565 Eramet MB r2 s 10/28/2014 John Perko 14288.40 6.23 3800

230625 Eramet MB r3 s 10/28/2014 John Perko 12994.80 0.35 3800

230533 Eramet MB r4 s 10/28/2014 John Perko 10642.80 0.00 3800

227106 Eramet MB r1 10/28/2014 John Perko 6762.00 0.00

230861 Eramet MB r2 10/28/2014 John Perko 9702.00 0.00

230793 Eramet MB r3 10/28/2014 John Perko 7467.60 0.00

230760 Eramet MB r4 10/28/2014 John Perko 5486.04 1.18

228616 Eramet 12 r1 s 10/28/2014 John Perko 1681.68 0.00 1000

228649 Eramet 12 r2 s 10/28/2014 John Perko 1781.64 0.00 1000 12-30B-4

228608 Eramet 12 r3 s 10/28/2014 John Perko 1628.76 5.88 1000

228695 Eramet 12 r4 s 10/28/2014 John Perko 1675.80 0.00 1000

227216 Eramet 12 r1 10/28/2014 John Perko 557.42 0.41

227247 Eramet 12 r2 10/28/2014 John Perko 617.40 0.65

227048 Eramet 12 r3 10/28/2014 John Perko 517.44 0.17

227204 Eramet 12 r4 10/28/2014 John Perko 486.28 0.00

230538 Eramet NU 10/28/2014 John Perko 4010.16 4.70 3800

227242 Eramet NU 10/28/2014 John Perko 0.00 0.58

227218 Eramet NU 10/28/2014 John Perko 6.29 0.64

Variability +- 10% Analysis Method: EPA 7473

Standard

Same Day Rush

Turn - Around Time

Calibration Report Available

Less than .220 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less than the lowest detection 

limit.

10/28/2014

Karl Mast
APPENDIX D

PROCESS DATA
Furnace 1

Eramet Marietta, Inc.

Furnace 1 Stack Test

October 15, 2014

Run 1: 8:20 - 9:50

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 24.85

F01BH Mod 1 DP in. W.C. 10.58

F01BH Mod 2 DP in. W.C. 6.42

F01BH Mod 3 DP in. W.C. 6.58

F01BH Mod 4 DP in. W.C. 6.27

F01BH Mod 5 DP in. W.C. 8.17

F01BH Mod 6 DP in. W.C. 6.44

F01BH Mod 7 DP in. W.C. 6.43

F01BH Mod 8 DP in. W.C. 9.12

October 15, 2014

Run 2: 10:20 - 11:50

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 26.13

F01BH Mod 1 DP in. W.C. 10.27

F01BH Mod 2 DP in. W.C. 6.85

F01BH Mod 3 DP in. W.C. 6.42

F01BH Mod 4 DP in. W.C. 6.38

F01BH Mod 5 DP in. W.C. 8.17

F01BH Mod 6 DP in. W.C. 6.58

F01BH Mod 7 DP in. W.C. 6.61

F01BH Mod 8 DP in. W.C. 8.99
October 15, 2014

Run 3: 12:20 - 13:50

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 25.88

F01BH Mod 1 DP in. W.C. 10.59

F01BH Mod 2 DP in. W.C. 6.38

F01BH Mod 3 DP in. W.C. 6.75

F01BH Mod 4 DP in. W.C. 6.29

F01BH Mod 5 DP in. W.C. 8.54

F01BH Mod 6 DP in. W.C. 6.54

F01BH Mod 7 DP in. W.C. 6.86

F01BH Mod 8 DP in. W.C. 9.04

October 15, 2014

Run 4: 14:20 - 15:50

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 24.11

F01BH Mod 1 DP in. W.C. 10.26

F01BH Mod 2 DP in. W.C. 6.78

F01BH Mod 3 DP in. W.C. 6.24

F01BH Mod 4 DP in. W.C. 6.59

F01BH Mod 5 DP in. W.C. 8.06

F01BH Mod 6 DP in. W.C. 6.53

F01BH Mod 7 DP in. W.C. 6.48

F01BH Mod 8 DP in. W.C. 8.46
Eramet Marietta, Inc.

Furnace 1 Stack Test

15-Oct-14

Total Material Weight For Day: 

15-Oct-14

Pile Name Nat. Weight

Anthracite 115050

BW Coke 100890

Comilog MMA 778800

Comilog Sinter 177000

Dolomite 54870

Goof Chute 38940

HCFeMn Remelts 70800

Millscale 31860

UMK 214170

Wood Chips 10620

Total 1593000 lbs/day

796.5 tons/day
Eramet Marietta, Inc.

Furnace 1 Stack Test

15-Oct-14

Tap Time Opened Time Closed Metal Weight

167 0:23 0:38 44850

168 2:22 2:37 40800

169 4:24 4:39 46100

170 6:29 6:43 40500

171 8:24 8:36 27400

172 10:26 10:39 36200

173 12:20 12:36 35400

174 14:18 14:40 37150

175 16:14 16:26 43550

176 18:12 18:25 39500

177 20:09 20:25 45800

178 22:21 22:35 51850

68.08 Tons

10.86 Tph

Note 6 hrs and 16 minutes

33 NT/HR @ 25.24 MW
Furnace 12

Eramet Marietta, Inc.

Furnace 12 Stack Test

October 16, 2014

RUN 1: 10:10 - 11:23

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 19.55

East Motor, Amps 246.1

West Motor, Amps 233.7

East Pressure Drop, InWg 53.8

West Pressure Drop, InWg 53.4

October 16, 2014

RUN 2: 11:57 - 13:11

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 19.02

East Motor, Amps 246.9

West Motor, Amps 234.2

East Pressure Drop, InWg 53.8

West Pressure Drop, InWg 53.4
October 16, 2014

RUN 3: 13:32 - 14:45

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 18.82

East Motor, Amps 244.6

West Motor, Amps 232.1

East Pressure Drop, InWg 53.8

West Pressure Drop, InWg 53.3

October 16, 2014

RUN 4: 15:09 - 16:22

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 19.17

East Motor, Amps 241.1

West Motor, Amps 228.5

East Pressure Drop, InWg 53.7

West Pressure Drop, InWg 53.2

OVERALL AVERAGE

Item Average

Furnace Load, MW 19.14

East Motor, Amps 244.7

West Motor, Amps 232.1

East Pressure Drop, InWg 53.8

West Pressure Drop, InWg 53.3
Eramet Marietta, Inc.

Furnace 12 Stack Test

October 16, 2014

Tap # Time Open Time Closed Lbs Metal

527 3:22 03:40 42350

528 5:48 06:10 22200

529 7:00 07:27 N/A

530 8:18 08:48 50500

531 9:34 10:01 N/A

532 10:59 11:18 27300

533 12:14 12:43 N/A

534 13:36 14:00 39400

535 15:11 15:32 N/A

536 16:22 16:37 40750

537 17:43 17:58 N/A

538 19:02 19:25 no metal

539 20:20 20:55 N/A

540 21:41 21:56 68000

541 23:00 23:14 N/A

53.73 Tons Avg

9.54 Tph 16.13 NT/HR @ 19.14 MW
Eramet Marietta, Inc.

Furnace 12 Stack Test

October 16, 2014

Total Material Weight For the Period (1 day)

Material lbs

Anthracite 26390

BW Coke 39070

Comilog Sinter 91000

Dolomite 9100

F1 Baghouse Dust 40950

FeSi Dross 45500

HC Slag Fce 12 203840

Millscale 20930

Si Dross 65520

Si Dross Fines 22750

SiMn Remelts 35490

UMK 164710

Wood Chips 9100

Total 774350 lbs/day

32264.6 lbs/hr

16.13 NT/hr

14.63 MT/hr
Hi Tom,

We calculated the rate that each furnace consumed electrode in lbs/hr, specifically, how many 

pounds of electrode were consumed during each stack test run in October. We don’t track 

individual electrodes, just the rate at which continuous electrode is consumed, which depends on 

various factors during a specific test. For percent composition, please see the attached SDS.

Fce 1, 10/15

Run Time (min) Run Time (hrs) Electrode Consumed 

(lbs)

Rate (lbs/hr)

94 1.567 1789 1142

95 1.583 1953 1234

95 1.583 1463 924.2

93 1.550 1270 819.4

Fce 12, 10/16

Run Time (min) Run Time (hrs) Electrode Consumed 

(lbs)

Rate (lbs/hr)

73 1.22 106 86.9

74 1.23 348 283

73 1.21 622 514

73 1.21 655 541
Electrode Paste Safety Data Sheet
APPENDIX E

QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND RESULTS

All of the equipment used is calibrated in accordance with the procedures outlined in the 

Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III (EPA-600/4-

77-027b). The following pages describe these procedures and include the data sheets.
STACK THERMOCOUPLES

Each thermocouple is calibrated by comparing it with an ASTM-3F thermometer at 

approximately 32°F, ambient temperature, 212°F, and 500°F. The thermocouple reads within 

1.5 percent of the reference thermometer throughout the entire range when expressed in degrees 

Rankine. The thermocouples may be checked at ambient temperature at the test site to verify the 

calibration. Calibration data are included in the following Thermocouple Calibration Data 

Sheet(s).



TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA FORM

FOR SAMPLE HEADS

12/23/2013

Reference

point

number

Sourcea

(Specify)

Reference

Thermometer

Temperature,oF

Thermocouple

Potentiometer

Temperature,oF

Temperature

Difference,b

o

F

Sample Head No. 1

1 Ambient Air 72 70 2

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 34 0

Sample Head No. 2

1 Ambient Air 71 70 1

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 34 0

Sample Head No. 3

1 Ambient Air 71 70 1

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 34 0

Sample Head No. 4

1 Ambient Air 72 70 2

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 34 0

Sample Head No. 5

1 Ambient Air 71 70 1

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 33 1

Sample Head No. 6

1 Ambient Air 72 70 2

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 34 0

Sample Head No. 7

1 Ambient Air 71 70 1

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 33 1

Sample Head No. 8

1 Ambient Air 71 69 2

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 33 1

Sample Head No. 9

1 Ambient Air 71 69 2

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 35 1

Sample Head No. 10

1 Ambient Air 72 72 0

ACCEPT 2 Cold Bath 34 33 1

Sample Head No. 11

1

ACCEPT

2

a

Type of calibration used. Calibrated By: BF

b

Allowable tolerance +2

o

F
Environmental Quality Management, Inc.

Dry Gas Meter and Orifice Meter.doc

DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE METER

Dry gas meters and orifices are calibrated in accordance with Section 3.3.2 of the QA 

Handbook. This procedure involves direct comparison of the dry gas meter to a reference dry 

test meter. The reference dry test meter is routinely calibrated using a liquid displacement 

technique. Before its initial use in the field, the metering system is calibrated over the entire 

range of operation. After each field use, the metering system is calibrated at a single 

intermediate setting based on the previous field test. Acceptable tolerances for the initial and 

final gas meter factors and orifice calibration factors are 0.02 and 0.20 from average, 

respectively.
Environmental Quality Management, Inc.

PitotTubeCalibration.doc
Environmental Quality Management, Inc.

PITOTS 2014.doc

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT

PITOT TUBE CALIBRATIONS
Environmental Quality Management, Inc.

PITOTS 2014.doc

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT

PITOT TUBE CALIBRATIONS
Environmental Quality Management, Inc.

Trip Balance.doc

TRIP BALANCE

The trip balance is calibrated by comparing it with Class-S standard weights, and it 

agreed within 0.5g. Calibration data are shown in the following Trip Balance Calibration Data 

Sheet(s).
Environmental Quality Management, Inc.

Barometer.doc

BAROMETER

The field barometer is calibrated to within 0.1 in. Hg of an NBS-traceable mercury-inglass barometer before the test series. It is checked against the reference barometer after each 

test series to determine if it reads within 0.2 in. Hg. The barometer reads within the allowable 

limits each time. Calibration data are included in the following Barometer Calibration Log(s).
Quality Assurance Checks

Furnace 1

Run No. 1 2 3 4

Date 10/15/14 10/15/14 10/15/14 10/15/14

Start Time 8:20 10:20 12:20 14:20

Stop Time 9:54 11:55 13:55 15:53 AVG

Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.223 0.223 0.223 0.223 0.223

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 30.03 30.03 30.03 30.03 30.03

Net Sampling Time, minutes 90.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 90.00

Volume Metered, cf 64.463 59.051 55.184 58.361 59.26

Avg. DGM Temp, F 79.46 86.96 90.21 84.58 85.30

AVG Delta H, in of H2O 1.37 1.21 1.13 1.27 1.25

AVG Delta H, in of Hg 0.1010 0.0889 0.0830 0.0933 0.09

DGM Calibration Factor 0.9410 0.9410 0.9410 0.9410 0.94

Volume of Gas Collected, dscf 59.790 53.997 50.154 53.607 54.39

Total Water Collected, mL 33.0 32.0 25.0 23.0 28.25

Volume of Water Vapor, scf 1.556 1.509 1.179 1.084 1.33

Moisture, % 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.38

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M 0.9746 0.9728 0.9770 0.9802 0.98

CO2 at Stack, % dry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

O2 at Stack, % dry 20.50 20.50 20.50 20.50 20.50

CO + N2, % dry 79.50 79.50 79.50 79.50 79.50

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb mole 28.82 28.82 28.82 28.82 28.82

Wet Molecular Weight, lb/lb mole 28.55 28.53 28.57 28.61 28.56

Stack Diameter or Equivelent, in. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.00

Stack Area, sq. in. 11304.0 11304.0 11304.0 11304.0 11304.00

Static Pressure, in. of H2O -0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47

Stack Pressure, in. of Hg 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00

Avg. Stack Temp., F 170.8 200.5 206.6 184.8 190.66

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P 0.7913 0.7545 0.7297 0.7645 0.76

SDE Average 19.875 19.391 18.839 19.413 19.38

Pitot Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Stack Gas Velocity, afpm 2926.9 2856.6 2773.1 2855.9 2853.11

Stack Flowrate, wet acfm 229,758 224,242 217,689 224,189 223969.49

Stack Flowrate, dry scfm 187,913 174,836 168,896 180,395 178009.88

Isokinetics, % 102.3 99.3 95.5 95.6 98.18
Furnace 12

Run No. 1 2 3

Date 10/15/14 10/15/14 10/15/14

Start Time 10:10 10:20 13:32

Stop Time 11:23 11:55 14:45 AVG

Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.250 0.195 0.250 0.232

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.07 29.07 29.07 29.07

Net Sampling Time, minutes 72.0 72.0 72.0 72.0

Volume Metered, cf 76.102 47.094 76.503 66.566

Avg. DGM Temp, F 76.50 78.38 84.08 79.65

AVG Delta H, in of H2O 3.27 1.24 3.30 2.60

AVG Delta H, in of Hg 0.2403 0.0913 0.2426 0.1914

DGM Calibration Factor 0.9410 0.9410 0.9410 0.9410

Volume of Gas Collected, dscf 69.030 42.352 68.431 59.938

Total Water Collected, mL 106.0 65.0 84.0 85.0

Volume of Water Vapor, scf 4.998 3.065 3.961 4.008

Moisture, % 6.8 6.7 5.5 6.3

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M 0.9325 0.9325 0.9453 0.9368

CO2 at Stack, % dry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

O2 at Stack, % dry 20.50 20.50 20.50 20.50

CO + N2, % dry 79.50 79.50 79.50 79.50

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb mole 28.82 28.82 28.82 28.82

Wet Molecular Weight, lb/lb mole 28.09 28.09 28.23 28.14

Stack Diameter or Equivelent, in. 95.4 95.4 95.4

Stack Area, sq. in. 7136.9 7136.9 7136.9 7136.9237

Static Pressure, in. of H2O -0.35 -0.37 -0.35 -0.36

Stack Pressure, in. of Hg 29.04 29.04 29.04 29.04

Avg. Stack Temp., F 127.0 127.7 126.9 127.2

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P 0.9675 0.9786 0.9648 0.9703

SDE Average 23.441 23.722 23.374 23.512

Pitot Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Stack Gas Velocity, afpm 3536.8 3579.3 3518.0 3544.7

Stack Flowrate, wet acfm 175,290 177,397 174,358 175,682

Stack Flowrate, dry scfm 142,689 144,248 143,909 143,615

Isokinetics, % 97.7 97.5 96.0 97.1
Run No. 4

Date 10/15/14

Start Time 15:09

Stop Time 16:22

Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.250

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.07

Net Sampling Time, minutes 72.0

Volume Metered, cf 76.467

Avg. DGM Temp, F 82.33

AVG Delta H, in of H2O 3.25

AVG Delta H, in of Hg 0.2391

DGM Calibration Factor 0.9410

Volume of Gas Collected, dscf 68.612

Total Water Collected, mL 110.0

Volume of Water Vapor, scf 5.187

Moisture, % 7.0

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M 0.9297

CO2 at Stack, % dry 0.00

O2 at Stack, % dry 20.50

CO + N2, % dry 79.50

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb mole 28.82

Wet Molecular Weight, lb/lb mole 28.06

Stack Diameter or Equivelent, in. 95.4

Stack Area, sq. in. 7136.9

Static Pressure, in. of H2O -0.38

Stack Pressure, in. of Hg 29.04

Avg. Stack Temp., F 129.6

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P 0.9612

SDE Average 23.340

Pitot Coefficient 0.84

Stack Gas Velocity, afpm 3523.5

Stack Flowrate, wet acfm 174,632

Stack Flowrate, dry scfm 141,099

Isokinetics, % 98.2
APPENDIX F

TEST PROTOCOL
SUMMARY OF ERAMET VOLUNTARY PAH AND MERCURY EMISSIONS TEST PLAN TO 

SUPPORT FERROMANGANESE AND SILICOMANGANESE NESHAP RULEMAKING

SEPTEMBER 23, 2014; REVISION 0 Page 1 of 3

Eramet Marietta Inc. (EMI) is planning to conduct a voluntary test program during the week of 

October 13, 2014 to characterize polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and mercury 

emissions from electric arc furnaces 1 (main baghouse outlet) and 12 (scrubber outlet) during 

production of silicomanganese and ferromanganese alloys at its facility in Marietta, Ohio. 

The overall goal of the tests is to supplement very limited data from previous tests and thereby 

gain a better understanding of the range and variability of actual emissions during production, 

using test measurement methods specified by EPA in the proposed NESHAP. 

Environmental Quality Management, Inc. (EQ) will perform the measurements, with laboratory 

analysis support from ALS in Burlington, Ontario (Canada). This summary outlines key aspects 

of the tests.

1. The objectives of the tests are:

1.1. To obtain at least three valid PAH and mercury emissions measurements at each 

exhaust;

1.2. To determine and document measurement data quality, and achieve 

measurement data quality acceptable for rulemaking purposes;

1.3. To document emissions from Furnace 12 scrubber during silicomanganese 

production;

1.4. To document emissions from Furnace 1 main baghouse during ferromanganese 

production;

1.5. To document furnace feeds and operating conditions during the tests.

2. Following is a summary of planned PAH sampling and analysis activities:

2.1. EQ will conduct four test runs (sampling and analysis) at each location in order to 

assure at least three valid test runs.

2.2. The tests will be conducted under the direction of a Qualified Source Test 

Individual (QSTI).

2.3. Each PAH sampling run will attempt to encompass one entire furnace heat cycle 

(tap to tap). It is anticipated that each sample run time will be approximately 70-

90 minutes. The sampling duration and sample gas volume will be less than in 

the 2012 tests. Based on the PAH amount (~1-160 milligrams) encountered in 

those tests, shorter runs are expected to provide sufficient PAH for analysis.

2.4. EQ will follow the procedures specified in California Air Resources Board (CARB) 

Method 429 to collect and analyze the samples. The method will be used as 

published, except the analytical procedure will be adjusted to accommodate 

potentially higher PAH concentrations based on the results of earlier tests.
SUMMARY OF ERAMET VOLUNTARY PAH AND MERCURY EMISSIONS TEST PLAN TO 

SUPPORT FERROMANGANESE AND SILICOMANGANESE NESHAP RULEMAKING

SEPTEMBER 23, 2014; REVISION 0 Page 2 of 3

2.4.1. High resolution gas chromatography and high resolution mass 

spectroscopy will be used for sample analysis.

2.4.2. Laboratory analysis will be expedited to the extent possible for fastest 

available turnaround consistent with data quality objectives. For high 

resolution analyses, a three-week turnaround is the shortest period 

provided by ALS.

2.4.3. Instrument Calibration range will be 0.002 to 2 ug/mL. The upper range 

will be expanded by dilutions and by increasing the labeled spiking levels 

(i.e. the Split Factor).

2.4.4. XAD-2 resin cartridges will be spiked based on the historic sampling 

results. A spike of 1000 ng per target compound will be used based on a 

split design of 10 and 100 ng per split.

2.4.5. The initial labeled internal standard spiking levels were selected to 

provide measurable quantities anticipating that the sample may need to 

be diluted prior to analysis. The spiking levels are designed to provide 

measurable spike recoveries at over an analytical dilution factor range of 

1 to 50 ng total PAH. At this dilution range and the planned spiking levels, 

the minimum quantifiable total PAH will range from 2.5 to 4000 ng. For a 

sample volume of approximately 1 dscm, the in-stack equivalent of the 

minimum analytical quantification limit corresponds to a total PAH 

concentration of 2.5 to 4000 ng/dscm.

2.4.6. If higher dilutions are required beyond the level at which the labeled 

internal standards can be measured, the dilute will be fortified with the 

labeled internal standards. While this represents a compromise over 

selecting higher initial spiking levels by increasing measurement 

uncertainty, it provides a means of correcting the samples for spike 

recoveries at higher PAH concentrations characteristic of the single 

7/2012 test while also providing reasonably low quantification minimums 

in the event PAH levels are lower, based on the 10/2012 tests.

3. Following is a summary of mercury sampling and analysis activities:

3.1. EQ will conduct four test runs (sampling and analysis) at each location in order to 

assure at least three valid test runs.

3.2. The tests will be conducted under the direction of a Qualified Source Test 

Individual (QSTI).

3.3. Each mercury sampling run will attempt to encompass an entire furnace heat 

cycle. It is anticipated that the sample run time will be approximately 70-90 

minutes.

3.4. Mercury test runs will be conducted during the PAH sampling runs.
SUMMARY OF ERAMET VOLUNTARY PAH AND MERCURY EMISSIONS TEST PLAN TO 

SUPPORT FERROMANGANESE AND SILICOMANGANESE NESHAP RULEMAKING

SEPTEMBER 23, 2014; REVISION 0 Page 3 of 3

3.5. Measurements will be made following USEPA Method 30B (sorbent tube 

approach). 

3.5.1. The method will be performed as published.

3.5.2. Paired sampling tubes operated in parallel will be used during each test 

run. 1 tube will be spiked with a known quantity of mercury for quality 

assurance purposes, as specified in the test method, and the second will 

be unspiked.

4. With expedited lab turnaround it is anticipated that a final report will be available for EPA 

review by November 24, 2014.
.

1280 Arrowhead Ct., Suite 2, . Crown Point, Indiana 46308 . (219) 661-9900/ FAX (219) 661-9902