alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Victoria Cooke HVITVED, Appellant, v. PENNYMAC CORP., Morten Hvitved, and American Express Bank, FSB., Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D17-0608

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NPC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James K. Schwartz, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of NPC International, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 11, 2007



/s/ James K. SchwartzJames K. SchwartzPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChief Operating Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or

otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required

by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and

Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Roseanne TERRANOVA, Appellant, v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3697

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT

OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON,

DC Request
of Silk Way West Airlines to amend issued exemption authority and pending application
for a foreign air carrier permit, and motion
to expedite processing (Baku-Hong Kong-Chicago-New YorkLuxembourg-Baku)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ______________________________)

Docket DOT-OST-2014-0111 MOTION TO WITHDRAW ANSWER AND SURREPLIES

OF KALITTA AIR, LLC Communications
with respect
to this document should be addressed

to: May 5, 2015

Mark W. Atwood Cozen O'Connor The Army
& Navy Club Bldg. 1627

I Street, NW Suite 1100 Washington,
DC 20006 (202) 463-2513 matwood@cozen

. com Counsel for Kalitta Air, LLCBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT

OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON,
DC. Request
of Silk Way West Airlines to amend issued exemption authority and pending application
for a foreign air carrier permit, and motion
to expedite processing (Baku-Hong Kong-Chicago-New YorkLuxembourg-Baku)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket DOT-OST-2014-0111 ________ __ ______________ ____ __
) MOTION TO WITHDRAW ANSWER AND SURREPLIES

OF KALITTA AIR, LLC Pursuant

to 14 C

. F

. R. § 302.6(c), Kalitta Air

, LLC ("Kalitta") hereby files this motion
to withdraw
its answer filed on October 29, 2014, and its surreplies filed on November
12, 2014 and December 22, 2014, objecting

to Silk Way West Airlines' request
to amend its exemption authority and pending application
for a foreign air carrier permit. Kalitta no longer opposes Silk Way West's application and requests that the Department withdraw
its answer and surreplies filed in the above referenced docket. Dated: May
5 , 2015 Respectfully submitted

, **~t_~L** 2 Mark W

. Atwood Cozen O'Connor The Army
& Navy Club Bldg

. 1627

I Street, NW Suite 1100 Washington,
DC 20006 (202) 463-2513 matwood@cozen.com Counsel for Kalitta Air, LLCCERTIFICATEOFSERVICEIherebycertifythatIhavethis5thdayofMay2015,causedthisMotionofKalittaAir,LLCtobeserveduponeachpersonlistedbelowviae-mail:sascha.vanderbellen@delta.comsametta.c.barnett@delta.comchris.walker@delta.comdshort@fedex.comsllunsford@fedex.comnssparks@fedex.comgbleopard@fedex.comsandysinick@gmail.comenisson@nac.aeromwiegele@nac.aerokevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.competer.beckett@polaraircargo.compdoell@naca.ccrobert.wirick@aa.comfrancis.heil@aa.comhoward.kass@aa.comrsilverberg@sgbdc.comjjohnson@sgbdc.comjcanny@amerijet.comdan.weiss@united.comjrichardson@johnlrichardson.commriordan@johnlrichardson.comjohn@mietuslaw.comrpommer@atlasair.comnwallace@wallaceair.comagoerlich@ggh-airlaw.comdhainbach@ggh-airlaw.comjudy@lac.lvnden.comrzerkel@lac.lvnden.comgwhite@lac.lynden.comjdavis@lac.Lynden.cominfo@airlineinfo.comanita.mosner@hklaw.comjennifer.nowak@hklaw.comdsmalls@ups.comslachter@cozen.comEngleTS@state.govgpwicks@wicks-group.comekagrimes@wicks-group.compmurphy@lopmurphy.com1iwrJic·1kuKennethC.Hines
Local Government Advisory Committee (LGAC)

Air, Climate & Energy Workgroup

Conference Call

Monday, February 2, 2015

11:00am – 12:00pm EST

Call in 866-299-3188 code 2025645340#

I. Welcome and Introductions

Commissioner Carolyn Peterson, Chair

II. Update on the Clean Power Plan

Kevin Culligan, Associate Division Director

Sector Policies & Programs Division, O!ce of Air Quality Planning & 

Standards (OAQPS)

III. Methane Strategy

Paul Gunning, Director 

Climate Change Division, O!ce of Atmospheric Programs

IV. Discussion on Ozone NAAQs Proposal

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/12/17/2014-28674/

national-ambient-air-quality-standards-for-ozone

Tom Powers, Senior Policy Advisor

O!ce of Air and Radiation (OAR)

V. Wrap-up and Next Steps

Commissioner Carolyn Peterson, Chair

Supervisor Salud Carbajal, Vice-Chair
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                        332
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              332
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         505,666
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      17,310
<OTHER-SE>                    (522,644)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  0
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              36,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (36,017)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (36,017)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (36,017)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.021)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey Stroburg, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Renewable Energy Group, Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffrey Stroburg                    
|Dated: July 15, 2011 |  |  |  | Jeffrey Stroburg Chief
Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

DAWAN DEONTE JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21-30090 

D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00023-SPW-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. 

Dawan Deonte Jones appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking 

supervised release and imposing a 6-month custodial sentence and 51-month term 

of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

Jones’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-30090 

with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Jones has filed a pro se 

supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

Jones’s pro se request to terminate his supervised release is denied without 

prejudice to renewal in the district court at the appropriate time. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3583(e)(1). 

Within 7 days of this disposition, appellee must serve the disposition on 

appellant individually and provide the court with proof of service, including 

appellant’s mailing address.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00777]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


National Petroleum Council; Notice of Renewal

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act and in 
accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 
102.3.65, and following consultation with the Committee Management 
Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given 
that the National Petroleum Council has been renewed for a two-year 
period.
    The Council will continue to provide advice, information, and 
recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on matters relating to oil 
and natural gas, and the oil and natural gas industries. The Secretary 
of Energy has determined that renewal of the National Petroleum Council 
is essential to the conduct of the Department's business and in the 
public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed by 
law upon the Department of Energy. The Council will continue to operate 
in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), the General Services Administration Final Rule on 
Federal Advisory Committee Management, and other directives and 
instructions issued in implementation of those Acts.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nancy Johnson at (202) 586-6458

    Issued at Washington, DC on January 8, 2018.
Wayne D. Smith,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-00777 Filed 1-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Garry Phillip WATSON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. J.W. FAIRMAN, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 03-55579.

D.C. No. CV-99-08686-CBM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Garry Phillip Watson, lone, CA, pro se.

Wayne R. Young, Santa Monica, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Chung L. Mar, Kerry Keach Winters, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before BROWNING, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Gary Phillip Watson appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We issued a certificate of appealability on one issue, whether Watson’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was violated when he admitted prior felony convictions at sentencing. This case is governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), and we conclude that the California Court of Appeal’s decision was neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law as determined by the United States Supreme Court.

Even if clearly established federal law did require advice of the consequences of admitting priors, *cf. United States v. Timmreck,*441 U.S. 780, 782-84, 99 S.Ct. 2085, 60 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979), the California Court of Appeal reasonably found that there was no likelihood that Watson’s sentence would have been any different. The prosecution was ready to prove the priors, and Watson has never disputed their validity. *See Lowell v. Prunty,*91 F.3d 1358, 1359 (9th Cir.1996) (per curiam).

We decline to consider Watson’s remaining claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, lack of due process and impeded access to the courts as they are beyond the scope of the certified issue. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Juan MESA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3072

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 19, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 999 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 999

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 6, 2024.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on Ways and Means: Mr. Gomez.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MISTY DAVIS AND DONOVAN D. DAVIS ,

Appellant s ,
v. Cas e No. 5D 21 -2602 LT Case No. 2014

- CA -008596-O
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE TO MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGEINVESTORS TRUST MORTGAGE LOAN ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-HEI,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed December 2, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Donald A. Myers, Jr., Judge. James Sweeting, II I , of James Sweeting , III, LLC, Baltimore, MD , for Appellants. Hallie S. Evans, of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Atlanta, GA , for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. LAMBERT, C.J., SASSO and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Andrew ISAACS, Appellant, v. Marcia ISAACS, individually, Peter M. Raimondi, Esq., individually, Robert J. Moraitis, P.A., and Florida Dept. of Revenue, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2681

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Todd MISAMORE, Appellant, v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION and Gallagher Bassett Services, Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D17-0761

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Sterling Drilling Fund Third Quarter 1996 10-Q and its qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,149
<PP&E>                                       5,626,850
<DEPRECIATION>                              (5,439,870)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,216<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,129
<SALES>                                         77,643<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,643
<CGS>                                           67,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other - se includes total partners' equity.
<F2>Sales includes $261 of interest income.
<F3>The limited partnership net income
was divided by the total number of limited partnership units
of 6,448.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Jerry L. THOMAS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Ronald C. Lundy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 12, 2005 By:         /s/ Ronald C. Lundy    Ronald C. Lundy    Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer  
27
Privacy 

or manually request a return, the sUAS will return to the starting 

point. 

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner's prior 

consent and knowledge. Filming will be of people who have also consented to being filmed or 

otherwise have agreed to be in the area where filming will take place. 

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012--size, weight, 

speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas and operation within 

visual line of sight and national security- provides more than adequate justification for the 

grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant's sUAS in the 

commercial video production industry pursuant to the Manual appended hereto. 

Sincerely 

"' 

~~~

Veteran Enterprises Ltd 

Garth Carlson 

11
HO% Y'alter C. Koodward, Pnge 14 

no law hereinafter enaoted shall apply to then U&S 

they be esgecinlly deoignzted therein. Yhe nap. *Smtar 

nal benefit ooolM.yn fs not contained in Koust? Bill 373. 

The tenz Vaacns or Ye.'seonlog~ does not apj-xar in IIouae 

I3111 3?3. 

it ia the 

questions 

X%hcrorore, you arc reoapeottully advised that 

ol:inion of thin .dc;uirtmnt +,k.t your three 

should eaoh be anewered in the negative, 

ATTORNEY GENERfiOJ' TEXAS