alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



As adopted pursuant to



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithtown Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 7, 2004, (the Report), I, Anita M. Florek, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 7, 2004



/s/ Anita M.FlorekAnita M. Florek, Executive Vice Presidentand Treasurer
P.1 

OAR Box 1859 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

76) FR 6-12-1986 

Docket Number: 

A-84-33 

Printed 11/24/2008 11:02:14 AM Sheet 76 of 79 
P.3 

21390 Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 113 / Thursday, June 12, 1986 / Proposed Rules 

In consideration of the foregoing, it is 

proposed to amend 36 CFR, Chapter I as 

follows: 

PART 7-SPECIAL REGULATIONS, 

AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK 

SYSTEM 

1. The authority citation for Part 7 

continues to read a s follows: 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k). 

2. By revising § 7.75(b) to read a s 

follows: 

§7.75 .Padre Island National Seashore. 

**** * 

(b) Hunting. (1) Hunting is prohibited, 

except that during the open season 

prescribed by State and Federal 

agencies, the hunting of waterfowl is 

allowed upon the waters of Laguna 

Madre wherever a floating vessel of any 

type is capable of being operated, at 

whatever tide level may exist. Provided, 

however, that the waters immediately 

adjacent to North and South Bird 

Islands and other designated rookery 

islands are closed to all hunting as 

posted. Hunting, where authorized, is 

allowed in accordance with all 

applicable Federal, State and local laws 

for the protection of wildlife. 

(2) The erecting of structures for use 

as hunting blinds is prohibited except 

that temporary blinds may be used 

when removed at the end of each 

hunting day. 

**** * 

Dated: May 23,1986. 

Susan Recce, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and 

Wildlife and Parks. 

[FR Doc. 86-13201 Filed 6-11-86; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-M 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 51 and 52 

fFRL-3009-3] 

Requirements for Implementation 

Plans; Surface Coal Mines and Fugitive 

Emissions; Extension of Comment 

Period 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Extension of public comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: On October 26,1984, EPA 

proposed that fugitive emissions be 

included in threshold applicability 

determinations of whether surface coal 

mines would be required to obtain air 

quality new source review permits (49 

FR 43211). On February 28,1986, EPA 

reopened this public comment period for 

60 days until April 29,1986 (51 FR 7090). 

The comment period was subsequently 

extended until May 29,1986 (51 FR 

15803, April 28,1986). 

Interested parties have requested that 

EPA extend this public comment period 

to permit preparation of comments. In 

response to those requests, I am hereby 

extending the public comment period by 

30 days. 

DATES: The close of public comment 

period is extended from May 29,1986, to 

June 30,1986. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be 

submitted (preferably in triplicate) to 

Central Docket Section (LE-132A), U.S. 

EPA, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, 

DC 20460, Attention: Docket No. A-84-

33. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mr. Kirt Cox, U.S. EPA (MD-15), 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 

telephone: 919-541-5591, FTS 629-5591. 

Dated: June 6,1986. 

J. Craig Potter, 

Assistant Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 86-13262 Filed 6-11-86; 8:45 am) 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M 

1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11

             BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE COMPUTATION


                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                           DECEMBER 31, 2001    DECEMBER 31, 2001
                                          -------------------  -------------------
                                           BASIC     DILUTED    BASIC     DILUTED
                                          --------  ---------  --------  ---------
<S>                                       <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>
Average outstanding shares                 61,031     61,031    60,297     60,297
Dilutive effect of options and warrants         -      3,730         -          -
                                          --------  ---------  --------  ---------
Equivalent Shares                          61,031     64,761    60,297     60,297
                                          ========  =========  ========  =========

Net income (loss)                         $    56   $     56   $(2,954)  $ (2,954)
                                          ========  =========  ========  =========
Earnings (loss) per share                 $  0.00   $   0.00   $ (0.05)  $  (0.05)
                                          ========  =========  ========  =========

                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                           DECEMBER 31, 2000    DECEMBER 31, 2000
                                          -------------------  -------------------
                                           BASIC     DILUTED    BASIC     DILUTED
                                          --------  ---------  --------  ---------

Average outstanding shares                 54,675     54,675    54,332     54,332
Dilutive effect of options and warrants         -          -         -          -
                                          --------  ---------  --------  ---------
Equivalent Shares                          54,675     54,675    54,332     54,332
                                          ========  =========  ========  =========

Net income (loss)                         $(4,158)  $ (4,158)  $(5,952)  $ (5,952)
                                          ========  =========  ========  =========
Earnings (loss) per share                 $ (0.08)  $  (0.08)  $ (0.11)  $  (0.11)
                                          ========  =========  ========  =========
</TABLE>


                                      -22-
<PAGE>
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |                    |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
| Dated: May 13, 2011 | /s/ Kendra Berger       |
|                | Kendra Berger           |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |
|                | NTN Buzztime, Inc.      |

----
p. 1 of 2 

From: Palazzolo, Michael A. [mailto:Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com] 

Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 9:25 AM To: Putney, David Cc: Bilskis, Patricia A. Subject: PMACT Data for Intalco Wet Scrubbers David, The table below provides a summary of POM emission tests performed on scrubbers at Intalco. Note that for wet scrubbers, a test "run" conssimultaneously samples collected on three different wet roof scrubber9 scrubber samples to make a complete 3-run compliance test. We completed 4 test runs (12 samples) in 2011 and 2012. These were s(stationary probe samples). We completed 6 test runs (18 samples) for the ICR in 2013. These wersamples. We do not believe these are representative due to an unidensystematic or analytical error that biased these data high. We collected two sets of paired simultaneous traversing and single po2013 that were invalidated due to high isokinetics.We collected two more sets of paired simultaneous traversing and singin 2014 that are considered valid tests. These results show similar traversed vs. single point samples. These paired tests do not make a because all of the sampling was performed at a single wet roof scrubb
p. 2 of 2 

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Mike Michael Palazzolo Alcoa Inc. 201 Isabella Street Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5858 Ph: 412-553-4832 

Date Number of Runs* Potline Pound POM/ short ton Al Comments November,2011 1 0.86 Stationary sampling. 20 hour sampling. 400-500 dscf sampled. March, 2012 3 0.443 Stationary sampling. 20 hour sampling. 500-600 dscf sampled. June, 2013 6 9.3 Traversed sampling. 3-4 hour sampling. 130-200 dscf sampled. 9/18/13 0.33 0.038 Stationary sampling. 12 hour sampling. 245 dscf sampled. Did 

9/19/13 0.33 1.34 Stationary sampling. 12 hour sampling. 256 dscf sampled. Did n

9/18/13 0.33 0.021 Traversed sampling. 12 hour sampling. 291 dscf sampled. Did not 

9/19/13 0.33 2.35 Traversed sampling. 12 hour sampling. 272 dscf sampled. Did not 

1/8/14 0.33 1.04 Stationary sampling. 8 hour sampling. 203 dscf sampled. 1/9/14 0.33 3.11 Stationary sampling. 8 hour sampling. 215 dscf sampled. 1/8/14 0.33 0.81 Traversed sampling. 8 hour sampling. 203 dscf sampled. 1/9/14 0.33 1.99 Traversed sampling. 8 hour sampling. 215 dscf sampled. * One run consists of sampling three scrubbers in a potline building simultaneously.
Tel: 905 946 1066
              Fax: 905 946 9524
              www.bdo.ca
            BDO Canada LLP
              60 Columbia Way, Suite 300
              Markham ON L3R 0C9 Canada











EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM








To the Board of Directors


Conforce International, Inc.





Gentlemen:





We consent to the inclusion of our Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 24, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Conforce International, Inc. and its
subsidiaries as of and for the year ended March 31, 2009, in the filing of the
Annual Report of Form 10-K/A for Conforce International,
Inc.








Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public
Accountants





Markham, Ontario


February 24, 2010














BDO Canada LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership,
is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and
forms part of the international BDO network of independent member
firms.
Charles L. REICHARD, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2055

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of GeoPark Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
(the “Report”), I, James F. Park, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 11, 2017



|/s/ James F. Park            
|-----------------------------
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
Darryl J. LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2530

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 10, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1184-1185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00201]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0666; Airspace Docket No. 17-ANM-15]


Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Pueblo, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final rule published in the Federal 
Register of November 27, 2017, that amends Class D and Class E airspace 
at Pueblo Memorial Airport, Pueblo, CO. The airspace description for 
the airport in Class E airspace designated as an extension to a Class D 
surface area contained a wording error.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, February 1, 2018. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual 
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Clark, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601 
Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057; telephone (425) 203-4511.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register (82 FR 
55943, November 27, 2017) Docket No. FAA-2017-0666 amending Class D and 
Class E airspace at Pueblo Memorial Airport, Pueblo, CO. Subsequent to 
publication, the FAA identified a clerical error in the legal 
description of the Class E airspace designated as an extension to a 
Class D or Class E surface area at Pueblo Memorial Airport. This 
correction changes the words ``. . . from 700 feet above the surface . 
. .'' to read ``. . . from the surface. . . .''

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, in the 
Federal Register of November 27, 2017 (82 FR 55943) FR Doc. 2017-25310, 
Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Pueblo, CO, is corrected as 
follows:


Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

ANM CO E4 Pueblo, CO [Corrected]

0
On page 55945, column 1, lines 14 and 15, the words ``That airspace 
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface'' are corrected to 
read ``That

[[Page 1185]]

airspace extending upward from the surface''.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on January 2, 2018.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-00201 Filed 1-9-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
(,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 1*186$ 

$3, &$//

72 86(

KWWSDSLHLDJRYVHULHV"DSLBNH\ <285B$3,B.(<B+(5(	VHULHVBLG 1*186$

6(5,(6

1$0(

86 1DWXUDO *DV ,PSRUWV $QQXDO

6(5,(6

,'

1*186$

6KRZ PH KRZ WR HPEHG D FKDUW RI WKLV VHULHV

2SHQ 'DWD

$3, 4XHU\ %URZVHU

(,$ 'DWD 6HWV ! 1DWXUDO *DV ! 6XPPDU\ ! 1DWXUDO *DV 6XPPDU\ ! E\ $UHD ! 86

&KDUW 'DWD

6HULHV 1DPH 3HULRG )UHTXHQF\ 9DOXH 8QLWV

86 1DWXUDO *DV  $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV ,PSRUWV $QQXDO

6HULHV ,' 1*186$

       









6RXUFH (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ
 (,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 1*186$ 

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW
 (,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 1*186$ 

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW

86 1DWXUDO *DV

,PSRUWV $QQXDO

 $  0LOOLRQ &XELF )HHW
CHIEF JUSTICE

 CAROLYN WRIGHT

JUSTICES

 DAVID L. BRIDGES

 MOLLY FRANCIS

 DOUGLAS S. LANG

 ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

 ROBERT M. FILLMORE

 LANA MYERS

 DAVID EVANS

 DAVID LEWIS

 ADA BROWN

 CRAIG STODDART

 BILL WHITEHILL

 DAVID J. SCHENCK

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75202

(214) 712-3400

LISA MATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712-3450

lisa.matz@5th.txcourts.gov

GAYLE HUMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

(214) 712-3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov

FACSIMILE

(214) 745-1083

INTERNET

HTTP://5TH.TXCOURTS.GOV

October 2, 2015

Honorable Dominique Collins

Presiding Judge

Criminal District Court No. 4

Frank Crowley Courts Building

133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-41

Dallas, TX 75207

Re: STATUS INQUIRY

05-15-00143-CR, Torrey Goodson v. The State of Texas

Dear Judge Collins:

On August 28, 2015, this Court ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. To date, we have not received the findings or appellant’s brief. 

Therefore, please notify us of the status of the findings within TEN DAYS of the date of this letter. 

We appreciate your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk

cc: Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk

Jeff Buchwald

Lori Ordiway

ltr:mrh
Andreau MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1810

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
In re Donna Unkel GRODNER.

No. 2015-B-1093.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 2015.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that she made affirmative misrepresentations to a federal court while serving as counsel in a civil action, in violation of Rules 3.3, 3.4, 4.1, and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Donna Unkel Grodner, Louisiana Bar Roll number 20840, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of sixty days, subject to the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
### 1491G-13·PI

SUl\!MARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the produclS Ii above. This AD results from mandatory contintng airworthiness infmmation (MCAI originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsaf.



# • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • • • • Dual-boll fractures could lead to-inability 

### formount assembly 

# tosustain loads which may lead to an engine 

### mount failure and eonsequently to engine separation from the aeroplane ddring flight, which would conslitule an unsafe condition. I condition on an.aviation prodUCLThe 

### MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: ACfION: Final rule. During accomplishment of

### Darnage 

### Tolerant - AitwortIDness Limitation 

### Item task 7121.064)1-'0.1 from A330 A.I..SPart 2, an A330 operator found a Fluprescent Penetrant Inspection (EPI) indication in the head ofthe shank filet radius inone ofllie Pratt 

### &Whitne~ (P\V) forward (FWD) engine mount pylon bolts . Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Modei A330-223, -321. ·)22, and -323 Airplanes I AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration 'AA), Department of Transportation 

### (DOn· RIN 21ZG-AA64 Federal Aviation AdmiDistratioD DEPARTMEI'<'T OF TRANSPORTATION 

# -- lit : "'T! 

### 14CFR Part 39 , 

# noq'ZOIO : -m••••.••

....,.._ (Docket' No. FAA~ZOl0-0278; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-ZS5-AD; Amendm . t 

### -#'6-(6 

# 1C?3tlQ J..O 

# 10-17-0, , - 39-.••. ***·; AD ·,. ••..••..••.



## ·*..•. 1

FAA Form 1360-14.1 {6-39} C)fflcw. ALE

### copy
John L. SANDERS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1952

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.