alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1010 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1010

   To authorize the honorary promotion of Master Sergeant Harold B. 
        Pharis, United States Army (retired), to Sergeant Major.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2023

   Mr. Braun introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the honorary promotion of Master Sergeant Harold B. 
        Pharis, United States Army (retired), to Sergeant Major.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR HONORARY PROMOTION OF MASTER SERGEANT 
              HAROLD B. PHARIS, UNITED STATES ARMY (RETIRED), TO 
              SERGEANT MAJOR.

    (a) Honorary Promotion.--The honorary promotion of Master Sergeant 
Harold B. Pharis, United States Army (retired), to the grade of 
Sergeant Major is hereby authorized.
    (b) Additional Benefits Not To Accrue.--The honorary promotion of 
Harold B. Pharis pursuant to subsection (a) shall not affect the 
retired pay or other benefits from the United States to which Harold B. 
Pharis is entitled based upon his military service or affect any 
benefits to which any other person may become entitled based on his 
military service.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ MEDIDEA, L.L.C., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC., DBA DEPUY SYNTHES JOINT RECONSTRUCTION,

Defendants

- Appellees

______________________

2020

- 1334

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 1:17

- cv

- 11172

- LTS, Judge Leo T. Sorokin.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

F REDERICK M ICHAUD , Capshaw DeRieux LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by D AVID L ESHT , M ARTIN A MARO , J OSEPH M. V ANEK , Sperl ing & Slater, P.C., Chicago, IL ; T ODD R AY W ALTERS , Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Alexandria, VA.

C ALVIN G RIFFITH , Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, argued Case: 20-1334 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 01/07/2021for defendants

- appellees. Also represented by T HOMAS K OGLMAN , K ENNETH L UCHESI , P ATRICK N ORTON ; C HRISTOPHER M. M ORRISON , Boston, MA; G REGORY A. C ASTANIAS , Washington, DC.

____________ __________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge

, W ALLACH and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 7, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 20-1334 Document: 64 Page: 2 Filed: 01/07/2021
Marvin L. ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-2760

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 9, 2018

Marvin L. Roberts, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Ray, and Makar, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14a AND 15d-14a
OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TRM Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 64




---



##### 



(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  November 14, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Daniel E. OBrienDaniel E. OBrienChief Financial Officer 65
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 898 

Recognizing November 2023 as ‘‘National Family Caregivers Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2023 

Mr. EVANS (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing November 2023 as ‘‘National Family Caregivers 

Month’’. 

Whereas in 2020, 53,000,000 family caregivers in the United 

States provide essential care to millions of people each 

year, providing unpaid care worth an estimated 

$600,000,000,000 annually; 

Whereas family caregivers play a vital role in the healthcare 

system of the United States, supporting loved ones who 

have chronic illnesses, disabilities, and are aging; 

Whereas family caregivers, who are disproportionately women 

of color, often face significant challenges including financial strain, physical and emotional exhaustion, and social 

isolation; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 898 IH 

Whereas ‘‘National Family Caregivers Month’’ is an opportunity to recognize and appreciate the contributions of 

family caregivers and to advocate for policies that support family caregivers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes ‘‘National Family Caregivers 

3 Month’’; 

4 (2) commends the 53,000,000 family caregivers 

5 in the United States who provide essential care to 

6 their loved ones and chosen family each day; 

7 (3) encourages Federal agencies, States, and 

8 the private sector to swiftly implement the steps de9 scribed in the 2022 National Strategy to Support 

10 Family Caregivers; 

11 (4) urges investment in policies that support 

12 family caregivers, including— 

13 (A) economic tax credits; 

14 (B) paid family and medical leave; 

15 (C) respite care; 

16 (D) home and community-based services; 

17 and 

18 (E) access to quality healthcare; and 

19 (5) encourages all people of the United States 

20 to learn more about family caregiving and to support 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 898 IH 

1 their loved ones and neighbors who are providing 

2 care. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
H. Res. 6 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 9, 2023. 

Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of 

daily meeting of the House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon 

on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 

Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ronald L.
OKelley, President and Chief Executive Officer of US Shipping General Partner
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

| |                                         | 
| | --------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Ronald
  L. OKelley                | 
| |                                         | 
| | Ronald L.
  OKelley                    | 
| | President
  and Chief Executive Officer | 
| | June 22,
  2009                         | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping
Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
Melissa P. PARKER v. David P. BROOME

1150967

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 11

NPC International, Inc.
Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings


                               For the Thirteen           For the Thirty-Nine 
                                  Weeks Ended                 Weeks Ended
                              Dec. 26,    Dec. 27,       Dec. 26,     Dec. 27,
                               1995        1994           1995         1994
PRIMARY

Shares outstanding
   at beginning of period    24,512,324  24,863,892     24,505,324  25,013,373

Weighted average of shares
issued and (reacquired)
   during period                  3,342    (327,973)         5,030    (187,539)

Assuming exercise of 
options and warrants 
reduced by the number
of shares which could 
have been purchased with 
the proceeds from exercise      188,269      10,069        119,806      21,774

Shares outstanding 
for computation of
per share earnings           24,703,935  24,545,988     24,630,160  24,847,608

Net income                   $3,912,000  $2,158,000    $11,674,000  $8,868,000

Earnings per share           $     0.16  $     0.09    $      0.47  $     0.36



FULLY DILUTED

Shares outstanding at
beginning of period          24,512,324   24,863,892     24,505,324 25,013,373

Weighted average of 
shares issued and 
(reacquired) during period        3,342     (327,973)         5,030   (187,539)

Assuming exercise of 
options and warrants 
reduced by the number
of shares which could 
have been purchased with
the proceeds from exercise      192,817       10,069        133,291     23,195

Shares outstanding for
computation of per share
earnings                     24,708,483   24,545,988     24,643,645 24,849,029

Net income                   $3,912,000   $2,158,000    $11,674,000 $8,868,000

Earnings per share           $    0.16    $    0.09     $      0.47       0.36
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-20750

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Omar Ledezma Rubio, also known as Jose GonzalezGonzalez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-69-1

Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Omar Ledezma Rubio has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 18, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-20750 Document: 00515679597 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2020
No. 19-20750

2

Cir. 2011). Ledezma Rubio has filed a response and an incorporated motion 

to appoint new counsel, which is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 

F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). The record is not sufficiently developed to 

allow us to make a fair evaluation of Ledezma Rubio’s claims of ineffective 

assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without 

prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 

(5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Ledezma Rubio’s response. We concur

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 19-20750 Document: 00515679597 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2020
Exhibit
12.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Guy
Burnett, certify that:





1.
 I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 20-F of Mission NewEnergy
Limited;





2.
 Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;





3.
 Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





4.
 The company’s
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
have:





a.
 Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;





b.
 Designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;





c.
 Evaluated the
effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and





a.
 Disclosed in this
report any change in the company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the company’s internal control over
financial reporting; and





5.
 The company’s
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the
company’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





a.
 All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and





b.
 Any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the company’s internal control
over financial reporting.





Date:
October 31, 2017





/s/ Guy
Burnett


Guy
Burnett


Chief Financial
Officer
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Thomas C. MONROE; Alvaro Restrepo ; Thomas D. Faircloth; Sean Staffore; the Estate of Adam C. Riber, deceased; and Suzanne G. Faircloth, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4729

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## NO. 12

- 19

- 00359

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

PHILIP J. EMERSON, J R., APPELLANT

V.

JERRY E. PARKER,
APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 402N D

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure and a court order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay

-- at the time an item is presented for filing

-- whatever fees are required by statute or Texas Supreme

Court order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. An appellate court may enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just.

Id

. A fter giving ten days ’ notice , an appellate court may dismiss when the appellant fail s to comply

with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a

response or other action wit hin a specified time. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

On November 14, 2019, Appellant, Philip J. Emerson, Jr. filed a statement of inability to

afford costs, to which the Wood County District Clerk filed a contest. On March 12, 2020, the

Honorable Lauren Parish , Senior Judge of the 115th District Court in Upshur County, signed an

order concluding that Emerson has the ability to afford payment of court costs. Emerson filed a

motion with this Court, in which he challenged Judge Parish’s order.

On April 8, this Court issued an order denying Emerson’s request to proceed without costs

and we ordered that Emerson pay the filing fee on or before April 15. The order warned that failure

to remit the filing fee on or before April 15 would result in the Court taking ap propriate action,2 including dismissal of the appeal without further notice. The April 15 deadline expired

, and

Emerson has not paid the required filing fee.

Because Emerson failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5 and an order of this Court , the

appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered April 22, 2020. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 2 2 , 2020

NO. 12

- 19

- 00359

- CV

PHILIP J. EMERSON, J R., Appellant
V. JERRY E. PARKER, Appellee

Appeal from the 402nd District Court

of Wood County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2019

- 327)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this

appeal be, and the same is, hereby di smissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court below

for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Paul NAPOLEONI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2605

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 16, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.