alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7702

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARRYLE EDWARD ROBERTSON, a/k/a Tiger,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:01-cr-00304-JFM-3)

Submitted: January 8, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013

Before KING, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryle Edward Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis 

Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen 

Schenning, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darryle Edward Robertson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying Robertson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion 

for relief from the judgment in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) proceeding. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on October 14, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed eleven 

months later. Because Robertson failed to file a timely notice 

of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Victor JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1802

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Chas Adam PAPPAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1025

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph Leroy JONES-EL, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC & Federal National Mortgage Association, Appellee/respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2518

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,030]


Circuit Science, Inc., Plymouth, MN; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 29, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of 
Circuit Science, Plymouth, Minnesota.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-7738 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL 14, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 14, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   March 28, 2011





/s/ Paritosh K. ChoksiParitosh K. ChoksiDirector, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer andChief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 14, LLC(Managing Member)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PUTNAM CENTRE ASSOCIATES, LLC., Appellant, v. PUTNAM COMMUNITY BINGO, INC., d/b/a Charity Bingo, Sherri L. Scroggins and Kent A. Scroggins, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-4163, 5D17-472

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Dale R. PATE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3506

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
## P.o.Box13so Wrangeu, AK 99929 907-87lf-2B29 

### wrangen@wrangeJI.com www.wransen.com

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division Office ofAviation Analysis US Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 December 2, 2014**~**.....**~;**.>··
.'., .! :.-··:·.

Re: Continuation ofAlaska Airlines EAS Service to Alaska communities of

## Wrangel('':-~etersburg, Yakutat, Cordova and Gustavus, Docket OST-1998-4899
Dear Mr. Schlemmer:
This letter is to express strong support for Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air service to our community and throughout the Southeast Alaska region. Thejet service Alaska Airlines currently provides is critical forthe continued access and economic well being ofWrangell and southeast Alaska. Wrangell has undertaken enormous infrastructure improvements in the last several years to grow and develop a diversified economy which includes tourism, marine industries, timber harvesting and commercial fishing industry. Reliable jet service to and from our community is a key component in the growth and long term stability ofWrangell. Tourism is a growing industry and local investments by businesses and the Borough ofWrangell to market and develop product would be lost ifthe essential air contract with Alaska Airlines is not renewed.



## ________ __**bJ~~§~__s:~rf~IJ!.J?~!!~III.91 s,~!:'!'l9~=-Y.§l1J.9J~t§\Ir~r~ft** _ 

# =**!Il~§!!.9!.1JCial n.?(;l<:i.!!!JI1~1** 

### 'NQ!JIQ.Q.(;l_

## dlfficJJltif not impossible, to meet with any other type of service or aircraft type:

• Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major communities of interest, with single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route system and benefit from its far-reaching marketing relationships. • Alaska's service provides essential cargo capacity necessary to meet many of our community's dally necessities. Alaska has demonstrated its commitment to meet the airfreight needs ofthe communities in the state by investing in navigation performance (RNP) flight technology allows access to airports in Southeast Alaska during periods of inclement weather, which enhances the reliability ofthe airline's service to our community.
Sincerely,

# ~~ Corree Delabrue Chair, Wrangell Convention and Visitor Bureau
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-214476, 333-206802, 333-181204, 333-133601-99, 333-107451-99, 033-62394-99, 333-107450-99, 333-80511-99, 033-46724-99, 333-25857-99, 333-179329, 333-133599-99, 333-17407-99, and 033-57675-99) of Noble Corporation plc of our report  dated February 24, 2017 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10‐K.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Houston, Texas


March 13, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      371
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   591
<PP&E>                                          19,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,987)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,549
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,300
<COMMON>                                         6,816
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,541
<SALES>                                            275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   275
<CGS>                                              336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
----

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Emory O. Berry                                                 |  |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|   |   | Emory O. Berry                                                     |  |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Operations |  |
|   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                       |  |

----
EX PARTE Heather Marie Coomey SHIRAH

1151230 (CR-15-0135)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSE RUIZ, DOC #H35961, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4191

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 22, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Glenn T. Shelby, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Tim Bower Rodriguez, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
      and
      (b) of


Section
      1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Asia Global Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
      Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form
      10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Asia Global Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Asia Global Holdings Corp.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                November 18, 2008
            /s/
                John LeperJohn
                Leper, Chief Financial Officer
Jorge Antonio HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1685

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Yolanda GUZMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jyoti SOOKNANAN-SINGH, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-3733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit
10.2 


 


TERM
SHEET


CONVERTIBLE
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	Issuer:	 	RAINMAKER
    WORLDWIDE INC. (the “Company”).
	 	 	 
	Investor:	 	_____________________ (the
    “Investor’’).
	 	 	 
	Instrument:
    	 	$55,000.00
    Convertible Promissory Note due twelve (12) months after issuance (the “Note”) with additional tranches of financing
    during the term of the Note in the aggregate amount of up to $700,000.00 subject to agreement by and between the Company and the
    Investor.
	 	 	 
	Interest:	 	10%
    per annum which shall not be due until maturity.
	 	 	 
	Conversion:	 	One
    hundred eighty (180) days following the date of funding and thereafter, the Note shall be convertible into shares of common stock
    of the Company (“Common Stock”).
	 	 	 
	 	 	The
    conversion price shall be subject to a discount of 35%. The conversion price shall be determined on the basis of the lowest closing
    bid price for the Common Stock during the prior ten (10) trading day period.
	 	 	 
	 	 	The
    Investor will be limited to convert no more than 4.99% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock at time of conversion at any one
    time.
	 	 	 
	Prepayment:	 	At
    any time during the periods indicated below, the Company may prepay the Note by paying an amount equal to the then outstanding amount
    multiplied by the corresponding percentage as indicated in the chart below.


 


	 	 	Period covered	 	Prepayment %	 
	Prepayment period #1	 	Days: 1-60	 	 	115	%
	Prepayment period #2	 	Days: 61-120	 	 	120	%
	Prepayment period #3	 	Days: 121-180	 	 	125	%





 


	Trading
    Activities:	 	Neither
    the Investor nor its affiliates have an open short position in the common stock of the Company and the Investor agrees that it shall
    not, and that it will cause its affiliates not to, engage in any short sales of or hedging transactions with respect to the common
    stock of the Company during the term of the Note.


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


	Documentation:	 	The
    definitive documentation shall contain such additional provisions, including without limitation representations, warranties, covenants,
    agreements and remedies, as the Investor may reasonably request.
	 	 	 
	Payables
    out of Proceeds:	 	Immediately
    priorto the closing of the funding, the following amounts shall be paid by the Company: (i) $3,000.00 to Investor’s counsel
    for the preparation of documents fee; and (ii)$750.00 due diligence fee for the Investor. If the transaction does not fund (close).
    no fees will be owed.
	 	 	 
	Governing
    Law and Jurisdiction:	 	Virginia,
    Courts located in Alexandria, Virginia.
	 	 	 
	Expiration
    Date:	 	This
    term sheet expires at 5 PM EST; February 10, 2022.


 


This
proposed preliminary term sheet constitutes an indication of interest for discussion purposes and preparation of definitive agreements
only and is not binding until and unless definitive agreements are executed by the parties.


 


Accepted
and Agreed


 


RAINMAKER
WORLDWIDE INC.


 


M.O’Connor,
CEO
Rogelio SANTOS and Rachel Santos a/k/a Rachel M. Santos, Appellants, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Joseph Nemchik, as trustee on behalf of and under the provisions of a trust agreement known as The Santos Land Trust, Bank of America, N.A., et al., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-602

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 2, 2018 Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

      ( print page 14993)    
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the following meeting:

*Name:*                         National Advisory Council on the National Health Service Corps (NHSC).                    

*Dates and Times:*                         May 7, 2009, 1 p.m.-4:45 p.m.; May 8, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m.; and May 9, 2009, 8:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Philadelphia Downtown, 1201 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19107.                         *Phone*: 215-625-2900.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be open to the public.                    

*Agenda:*                         The Council will be convening in Philadelphia, PA to hear updates from the Agency, discuss recruitment strategies for the NHSC and address current workforce issues. The Council will also participate in a regional town hall meeting sponsored by the NHSC.                    

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Jeanean Willis-Marsh, Bureau of Clinician Recruitment and Service, Health Resources and Services Administration, Parklawn Building, Room 8A-46, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; e-mail:                         *JWillis@hrsa.gov*; telephone: 301-449-4494.                    

Dated: March 26, 2009.

Alexandra Huttinger, 

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.

[FR Doc. E9-7424 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **2 -**  **7702**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DARRYLE EDWARD ROBERTSON, a/k/a Tiger , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:01

- cr - 00304

- JFM

- 3)

Submitted : January 8, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013

Before KING , SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Darryle Edward Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Schenning, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Darryle Edward Robertson seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying Robertson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the judgment in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (Wes t Supp. 2012) proceeding. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a not ice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court ’ s order was entered on the docket

on October 14, 2011 . The notice of appeal was filed eleven months later
. Because Robertson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Tardrick HOLIDAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2604

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Melissa P. PARKER

1151255 (2150353)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.