alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# #26A

Refrigerator

/Freezers : Standard Efficiency Improvement Level 

# J Energy Star I lDiscount rate 

# I 7% I Discount to year 2003 NES (quads) NPV (billion $) Product lifetime ( nearest full year) 19 

### Refrigerator/Freezers: Standard Energy Star IDiscount rate I Product lifetime (nearest full year) 

# #26A NES (quads) NPV (billion $)

# #26A

$0.52' 

# #26A I 2.891 

# I $0.521
# Den Europæiske Unions C 15I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 015I |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 64. årgang14. januar 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 015I

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

64. årgang14. januar 2021

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | Berigtigelser |
| | Berigtigelse til fælles erklæring fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet for Den Europæiske Union og Europa-Kommissionen — EU’s lovgivningsmæssige prioriteter for 2021 ( EUT C 451 I af 29.12.2020 ) | 1 |
| | Berigtigelse til fælles konklusioner fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet for Den Europæiske Union og Europa-Kommissionen — Politiske mål og prioriteter for 2020-2024 ( EUT C 451 I af 29.12.2020 ) | 2 |

Indhold

Side

Berigtigelser

Berigtigelse til fælles erklæring fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet for Den Europæiske Union og Europa-Kommissionen — EU’s lovgivningsmæssige prioriteter for 2021 ( EUT C 451 I af 29.12.2020 )

( EUT C 451 I af 29.12.2020 )

1

Berigtigelse til fælles konklusioner fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet for Den Europæiske Union og Europa-Kommissionen — Politiske mål og prioriteter for 2020-2024 ( EUT C 451 I af 29.12.2020 )

( EUT C 451 I af 29.12.2020 )

2

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

Berigtigelser

| 14.1.2021 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CI 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2021

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CI 15/1

---

Berigtigelse til fælles erklæring fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet for Den Europæiske Union og Europa-Kommissionen — EU’s lovgivningsmæssige prioriteter for 2021

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 451 I af 29. december 2020
  )

(2021/C 15 I/01)

Offentliggørelsen af fælles erklæring (2021/C 451 I/01) på side 1 skal anses for ugyldig.

---

| 14.1.2021 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CI 15/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2021

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CI 15/2

---

Berigtigelse til fælles konklusioner fra Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet for Den Europæiske Union og Europa-Kommissionen — Politiske mål og prioriteter for 2020-2024

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 451 I af 29. december 2020
  )

(2021/C 15 I/02)

Offentliggørelsen af 2021/C 451 I/02 på side 4 skal anses for ugyldig.

---
#26A

Refrigerator/Freezers : Standard

Efficiency Improvement Level J Energy Star

I lDiscount rate I 7%

I Discount to year 2003

NES (quads)

NPV (billion $)

Product lifetime ( nearest full year) 19

EE-PS-04-001 COMMENT 26A

Refrigerator/Freezers: Standard 

Energy Star 

IDiscount rate 

I Product lifetime (nearest full year) 

#26A 

NES (quads) 

NPV (billion $) 
#26A

$0.52'

EE-PS-04-001 COMMENT 26A

#26A 

I 2.891 

I $0.521
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Medical Discoveries, Inc. (the “Company”)
      hereby certifies that, to her knowledge:




(i)  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and




(ii)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                  December 19, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                JUDY
                ROBINETTJudy
                  Robinett
                Chief
                  Executive Officer and interim
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1089 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1089

 To maintain the National Coal Council in the Department of Energy to 
   provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on 
matters relating to coal and the coal industry, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2023

  Mr. Hoeven (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Daines, Mr. Lankford, and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To maintain the National Coal Council in the Department of Energy to 
   provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on 
matters relating to coal and the coal industry, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coal Council Certainty Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL COAL COUNCIL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Energy shall maintain the 
National Coal Council, in accordance with the charter for the National 
Coal Council (as filed with Congress on November 19, 2021).
    (b) Applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Federal 
        Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall apply to the 
        National Coal Council.
            (2) Termination.--Section 14 of the Federal Advisory 
        Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the National 
        Coal Council.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                                 WILTEX A, INC.
                            1191 Woodstock, Suite #5
                           Estes Park, Colorado 80517

May 15, 2002

Patricia Anne Dickerson
Energy Direct Communications, LLC
800 N. Highway 77, Suite 160, PMB #194
Waxahachie, Texas 75165

Re: Lock-Up Agreement with Wiltex A, Inc.

Ms. Dickerson:

In consideration of the sale to the holder by Wiltex A, Inc., (the "Company") of
its common stock ($.001 par value), the undersigned holder warrants, covenants
and agrees for the benefit of the Company not to sell, offer to sell, solicit an
offer to buy, contract to sell, make any short sale, pledge, grant, grant any
option to purchase, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, any shares of common
stock, or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
common stock, owned directly or beneficially by the undersigned or with respect
to which the undersigned has the power of disposition, except in connection with
or following a completed merger or acquisition by the Company and the Company is
no longer classified as a blank check company pursuant to Section 7 (b) (3) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

An attempt to sell, transfer or any type of disposition of the shares shall be a
violation of this Agreement and shall be ineffective and null and void.

In furtherance of the foregoing, the holder agrees to: (1) deliver its shares to
the Company for safe keeping; (2) allow the Company to advise its Transfer Agent
not to transfer said securities and (3) authorize the Company to deliver a copy
of this Agreement to the Transfer Agent with instructions to decline to make any
transfer of securities if such transfer would constitute a violation or breach
of this Agreement.

This Agreement shall be binding upon the holder, its agents, heirs, successors,
assignees and beneficiaries.

A waiver of the terms and conditions of this agreement must be in writing and
executed by the proper officer of the Company and the holder.


<PAGE>
If there is a breach or threatened breach of this Agreement, the holder agrees
that there is no adequate remedy at law and said breach will cause irreparable
damage. Accordingly, the holder agrees that the Company is entitled to the
issuance of an immediate injunction without notice to restrain the breach or
threatened breach. This remedy is not exclusive and the holder agrees that the
Company and third party beneficiaries shall be entitled to seek other remedies
including a claim for other remedies, including money damages.

THE HOLDER

/s/ Patricia Anne Dickerson            Constituting 10,000 shares (certificates)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 558


New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal Feeds

CFR Correction

    In title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 558, revised 
as of April 1, 2008, on page 410, in Sec.  558.58 (e)(1)(iii), the 
entry for Bambermycins 1 to 3, in the column under ``Limitations'' 
remove ``057926'' and in its place add ``016592''; in the column under 
``Sponsors'', add ``016592''.

[FR Doc. E9-6810 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Order entered July 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01636-CV

CAROL SOLOMAN, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 76,070

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s July 8, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellee shall file its brief on or before July 17, 2013. We caution appellee that no further 

extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Nicholas J. ANGELASTRO, Appellant/Petitioner(s) v. SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL BOARD, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3500

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT
RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report (report) on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Restaurant
Properties II;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2007
    

/s/ Steven L. BrakeSteven L. BrakeTreasurer
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00473]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 205

[Docket ID: DOD-2017-OS-0004]
RIN 0790-AJ05


End Use Certificates (EUCs)

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule removes DoD's regulation concerning the 
signing of EUCs required by foreign governments for foreign defense 
items purchased by the United States. DoD has determined that this part 
does not place a burden on the public as it deals with matters internal 
to DoD. DoD signs end use certificates (following internal coordination 
and approval) at the behest of a foreign country, when DoD is buying 
products from that country. Therefore, this part is unnecessary and can 
be removed from the CFR.

DATES: This rule is effective on January 12, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Kay at 703-693-0909.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It has been determined that publication of 
this CFR part removal for public comment is impracticable, unnecessary, 
and contrary to public interest since it is based on removing DoD 
internal policies and procedures that are publically available on the 
Department's issuance website. Once signed, a copy of DoD's internal 
guidance contained in DoD Directive 2040.03 will be made available at 
http://www.esd.whs.mil/Directives/issuances/dodd/.
    This rule is being removed from the CFR because it does not place a 
burden on the public as it deals with matters internal to DoD. As a 
direct result of there being no burden on the public, there was never 
was a cost to the public to execute this rule, therefore, removing it 
does not provide a cost savings to the public.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 205

    Government procurement.

PART 205--[REMOVED]

0
Accordingly, under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 205 is 
removed.

    Dated: January 9, 2018.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018-00473 Filed 1-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Richard HUGHES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Helen E. LESESNE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-2131

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.

Denied.
-Ar.~ --------

~...-

-~ 

-:::;;;: .-: NEWTON A VIA TION 

EAS Task Force decision comments 

."_\,,; A q: 45 

As an owner of a FBO in Lewistown, I am somewhat dismayed with the decision to change airline service to 

Gulfstream from Great Lakes Airlines. I have contacted other vendors including Richland Aviation in Sidney, 

Prairie Aviation in Glasgow, Brad at the Miles City FBO and Havre Flying Service and have found that they feel 

the same way. In a press release from Miles City new paper it appears that their Airport Board was not happy. 

Other airport boards are yet to be contacted to see what their thoughts are. 

The basic arguments are that the airport and community businesses in some communities were left out of the 

process. The "airport businesses" I have talked to are happy with their relationships with Great Lakes and all are 

especially happy that "they pay their bills on time". It does not appear that the task force weighed the economic 

impact of changing airlines and did not ask for opinions from affected airport businesses. Under Gulfstream most 

of the new business will go to Billings. 

The news papers reported a 6-1 vote in favor of Gulfstream by the EAS Taskforce. I think Great Lakes Airlines 

got a bad deal. In the real world I do not think it is as "one sided" as it appeared in the newspaper. Does the 

general public realize the difficulties of delivering scheduled service to small communities in Montana? I think 

not, and this is where many of the complaints come from. Weather, runway maintenance, connecting flights and all 

sorts of difficulties associated with airline service in rural areas are not always considered. Those of us who work 

with Great Lakes daily see their service continuing to improve and I think they would continue to improve over 

time. 

The routes proposed by Gulfstream, at least for Lewistown, have proven unsuccessful. The news paper reported 

that the people of Montana want to go to Billings. As I understand it, some of Great Lakes routes do go to 

Billings. My understanding is that subsidized service is to connect rural areas to larger hubs and not for personal 

convemence. 

Those of us who work the closest with Great Lakes Airlines are happy with them and feel we were not considered 

in this process. I hope you will reconsider the taskforce recommendations. At least four out of seven businesses at 

affected airports and some of the airport boards do not agree with this decision by the EAS Taskforce. I feel that 

Great Lakes should be retained for EAS Montana. 

Donald H Newton - Owner 

Lewistown Airport 

410 Skyline Drive 

Lewistown, MT 59457 

406-538-8150 -Office 

406-538-8166 -Fax 

406-366-7892 -Cell 

newton@lewistownairport.com 

Exxon Fuel 

100, Jet A 

Aircraft Maintenance 

Aerial Crop Spraying 

EJkonMobil ~ ".,
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7122]



[[Page 14588]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,326]


Archway Cookies, LLC; Ashland, OH; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on October 27, 2008 in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers and former workers of Ashland 
Cookies, LLC, Ashland, Ohio.
    The petitioning workers have requested that the petition be 
withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-7122 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Joshua A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Heather E. WILLIAMS, Respondent, and Gary Urso, Esq., as Guardian ad Litem.

Case No. 2D16-4670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0171

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,615,711<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,317,965<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   294,000<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,121,623<F1>
<PP&E>                                       7,961,711<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,643,000<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,729,314<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,069,677<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F1>
<COMMON>                                        13,577<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,821,570<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,729,314<F1>
<SALES>                                              0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,969,395<F1>
<CGS>                                       33,027,209<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,108,361<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (156,005)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,648,319<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                368,720<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                   270,599<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,121<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Fiscal year 1995 has been restated for the effects of the pooling-of-interest
and to comply with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128,
Earnings per Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Josue LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1513

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.