3334 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

Show, Detroit River, Detroit, MI. This 

security zone is intended to restrict 

vessels from a portion of the Detroit 

River in order to ensure the safety and 

security of participants, visitors, and 

public officials at the North American 

International Auto Show (NAIAS), 

which is being held at Cobo Hall in 

downtown Detroit, MI. Vessels in close 

proximity to the security zone will be 

subject to increased monitoring and 

boarding during the enforcement of the 

security zone. No person or vessel may 

enter the security zone while it is being 

enforced without permission of the 

Captain of the Port Detroit. 

DATES: The security zone regulation 

described in 33 CFR 165.915(a)(3) is 

effective without actual notice from 

January 21, 2016 through 11:59 p.m. on 

January 24, 2016. For purposes of 

enforcement, actual notice will be used 

from 8 a.m. on January 11, 2016 through 

January 21, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this document, 

call or email LCDR Nicholas Seniuk, 

Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard Sector 

Detroit, 110 Mount Elliot Ave., Detroit, 

MI 48207; telephone (313) 568–9508; 

email Nicholas.C.Seniuk@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce the North American 

International Auto Show, Detroit River, 

Detroit, MI security zone listed in 33 

CFR 165.915(a)(3). This security zone 

includes all waters of the Detroit River 

encompassed by a line beginning at a 

point of origin on land adjacent to the 

west end of Joe Louis Arena at 42°19.44′ 

N., 083°03.11′ W.; then extending 

offshore approximately 150 yards to 

42°19.39′ N., 083°03.07′ W.; then 

proceeding upriver approximately 2000 

yards to a point at 42°19.72′ N., 

083°01.88′ W.; then proceeding onshore 

to a point on land adjacent the 

Tricentennial State Park at 42°19.79′ N., 

083°01.90′ W.; then proceeding 

downriver along the shoreline to 

connect back to the point of origin. All 

coordinates are North American Datum 

1983. 

All persons and vessels shall comply 

with the instructions of the Captain of 

the Port Detroit or his designated onscene representative, who may be 

contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

Under the provisions of 33 CFR 

165.33, no person or vessel may enter or 

remain in this security zone without the 

permission of the Captain of the Port 

Detroit. Each person and vessel in this 

security zone shall obey any direction or 

order of the Captain of the Port Detroit. 

The Captain of the Port Detroit may take 

possession and control of any vessel in 

this security zone. The Captain of the 

Port Detroit may remove any person, 

vessel, article, or thing from this 

security zone. No person may board, or 

take or place any article or thing on 

board any vessel in this security zone 

without the permission of the Captain of 

Port Detroit. No person may take or 

place any article or thing upon any 

waterfront facility in this security zone 

without the permission of the Captain of 

the Port Detroit. 

Vessels that wish to transit through 

this security zone shall request 

permission from the Captain of the Port 

Detroit or his designated representative. 

Requests must be made in advance and 

approved by the Captain of Port before 

transits will be authorized. Approvals 

may be granted on a case by case basis. 

The Captain of the Port may be 

contacted via U.S. Coast Guard Sector 

Detroit on channel 16, VHF–FM. The 

Coast Guard will give notice to the 

public via Local Notice to Mariners and 

VHF radio broadcasts that the regulation 

is in effect. 

This document is issued under 

authority of 33 CFR 165.915 and 5 

U.S.C. 552(a). If the Captain of the Port 

determines that this security zone need 

not be enforced for the full duration 

stated in this document; he may 

suspend such enforcement and notify 

the public of the suspension via a 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

Dated: January 8, 2016. 

Raymond Negron, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting 

Captain of the Port Detroit. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01190 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0464; FRL–9939–78– 

Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; 

Wisconsin State Board Requirements 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is finalizing approval of 

state implementation plan (SIP) 

submissions from Wisconsin regarding 

the state board requirements under 

section 128 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

EPA is also approving elements of SIP 

submissions from Wisconsin regarding 

the infrastructure requirements of 

section 110, relating to state boards for 

the 1997 ozone, 1997 fine particulate 

(PM2.5), 2006 PM2.5, 2008 lead (Pb), 2008 

ozone, 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and 

2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The proposed rulemaking 

associated with this final action was 

published on September 11, 2015, and 

EPA received no comments during the 

comment period, which ended on 

October 13, 2015. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

February 22, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0464. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Eric 

Svingen, Environmental Engineer, at 

(312) 353–4489 before visiting the 

Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

Svingen, Environmental Engineer, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–4489, 

svingen.eric@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background of these SIP 

submissions? 

II. What guidance is EPA using to evaluate 

these SIP submissions? 

III. What is the result of EPA’s review of 

these SIP submissions? 

IV. What action is EPA taking? 

V. Incorporation by Reference 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background of these SIP 

submissions? 

This rulemaking addresses 

submissions from the Wisconsin 

Department of Natural Resources 

(WDNR) dated July 2, 2015. These 


jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 3335 

1PM2.5 refers to particles with an aerodynamic 

diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers, 

oftentimes referred to as ‘‘fine’’ particles. 

submissions are intended to address 

CAA requirements relating to the state 

board requirements under section 128, 

as well as infrastructure requirements of 

section 110, relating to state boards for 

the 1997 ozone, 1997 PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, 

2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 

2010 SO2 NAAQS. 

The requirement for states to make 

infrastructure SIP submissions arises 

out of CAA section 110(a)(1). Pursuant 

to section 110(a)(1), states must make 

SIP submissions ‘‘within 3 years (or 

such shorter period as the Administrator 

may prescribe) after the promulgation of 

a national primary ambient air quality 

standard (or any revision thereof),’’ and 

these SIP submissions are to provide for 

the ‘‘implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement’’ of such NAAQS. The 

statute directly imposes on states the 

duty to make these SIP submissions, 

and the requirement to make the 

submissions is not conditioned upon 

EPA’s taking any action other than 

promulgating a new or revised NAAQS. 

Section 110(a)(2) includes a list of 

specific elements that ‘‘[e]ach such 

plan’’ submission must address. 

EPA has historically referred to these 

SIP submissions made for the purpose 

of satisfying the requirements of CAA 

section 110(a)(1) and (2) as 

‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ submissions. 

Although the term ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ 

does not appear in the CAA, EPA uses 

the term to distinguish this particular 

type of SIP submission from 

submissions that are intended to satisfy 

other SIP requirements under the CAA. 

This specific rulemaking is only taking 

action on the CAA 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) 

element of these infrastructure SIP 

requirements, which is the only 

infrastructure SIP element addressed in 

WDNR’s submittal dated July 2, 2015. 

II. What guidance is EPA using to 

evaluate these SIP submissions? 

EPA’s guidance for these submissions 

is highlighted in an October 2, 2007, 

guidance document entitled ‘‘Guidance 

on SIP Elements Required Under 

Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 1997 

8-hour Ozone and PM2.5 1 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards’’ (2007 

Guidance). Further guidance is provided 

in a September 13, 2013, document 

entitled ‘‘Guidance on Infrastructure 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

Elements under CAA Sections 110(a)(1) 

and (2)’’ (2013 Guidance). 

III. What is the result of EPA’s review 

of these SIP submissions? 

Pursuant to section 110(a), states must 

provide reasonable notice and 

opportunity for public hearing for all 

infrastructure SIP submissions. WDNR 

provided notice of a public comment 

period on May 9, 2015, held a public 

hearing at WDNR State Headquarters on 

June 9, 2015, and closed the public 

comment period on June 11, 2015. No 

comments were received. 

Wisconsin provided a detailed 

synopsis of how various components of 

its SIP meet each of the applicable 

requirements in section 128 and 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the 1997 ozone, 1997 

PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, 2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 

2010 NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS, as 

applicable. 

On September 11, 2015 (80 FR 54744), 

EPA published a proposed rule that 

would approve these submissions into 

Wisconsin’s SIP. This proposed rule 

contained a detailed evaluation of how 

Wisconsin’s submissions satisfy certain 

requirements under CAA sections 110 

and 128. No comments were received. 

Therefore, EPA is finalizing this rule as 

proposed. 

IV. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is taking final action to 

incorporate Wis. Stats. 15.05, 19.45(2), 

and 19.46 into Wisconsin’s SIP. EPA is 

further approving these submissions as 

meeting CAA obligations under section 

128, as well as 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the 

1997 ozone, 1997 PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, 

2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 

2010 SO2 NAAQS. 

V. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation 

by reference of the Wisconsin 

Regulations described in the 

amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 

below. EPA has made, and will continue 

to make, these documents generally 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 

for more information). 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 


jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
3336 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by March 21, 2016. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides. 

Dated: November 23, 2015. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.2570 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(134) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2570 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(134) On July 2, 2015, the Wisconsin 

Department of Natural Resources 

submitted a request to revise the State 

Implementation Plan to satisfy the state 

board requirements under section 128 of 

the Clean Air Act. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) Wisconsin Statutes, section 15.05 

Secretaries, as revised by 2013 

Wisconsin Act 20, enacted on June 30, 

2013. (A copy of 2013 Wisconsin Act 20 

is attached to section 15.05 to verify the 

enactment date.) 

(B) Wisconsin Statutes, section 

19.45(2), as revised by 1989 Wisconsin 

Act 338, enacted on April 27, 1990. (A 

copy of 1989 Wisconsin Act 338 is 

attached to section 19.45(2) to verify the 

enactment date.) 

(C) Wisconsin Statutes, section 19.46 

Conflict of interest prohibited; 

exception, as revised by 2007 Wisconsin 

Act 1, enacted on February 2, 2007. (A 

copy of 2007 Wisconsin Act 1 is 

attached to section 19.46 to verify the 

enactment date.) 

■ 3. Section 52.2591 is amended by 

adding paragraph (j) to read as follows: 

§ 52.2591 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure 

requirements. 

* * * * * 

(j) Approval—In a July 2, 2015, 

submission, Wisconsin certified that the 

state has satisfied the infrastructure SIP 

requirements of section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) 

for the 1997 ozone, 1997 PM2.5, 2006 

PM2.5, 2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, 

and 2010 SO2 NAAQS. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01015 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

46 CFR Part 15 

[Docket No. USCG–2015–0758] 

RIN 1625–AC25 

Offshore Supply Vessels, Towing 

Vessel, and Barge Engine Rating 

Watches 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: On October 26, 2015, the 

Coast Guard published a direct final 

rule, which notified the public of our 

intent to amend merchant mariner 

manning regulations to align them with 

statutory changes made by the Howard 

Coble Coast Guard and Maritime 

Transportation Act of 2014. The Act 

allows oilers serving on certain offshore 

support vessels, towing vessels, and 

barges to be divided into at least two 

watches. The change would increase the 

sea service credit affected mariners are 

permitted to earn for each 12-hour 

period of work from one day to one and 

a half days. The rule will go into effect 

as scheduled. 

DATES: The effective date of the direct 

final rule published at 80 FR 65165 on 

October 26, 2015 is confirmed as 

January 25, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Davis Breyer, Marine Personnel 

Qualifications Division (CG–OES–1), 

Coast Guard; email Davis.J.Breyer@

uscg.mil, telephone (202) 372–1445. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We 

received two comments in response to 

the direct final rule (DFR). The two 

comments we received were either not 

adverse or separable from and not 

within the scope of the rulemaking. 

One commenter supported the rule 

and thanked the Coast Guard for its 

prompt action. Another commenter 

titled its comment as ‘‘adverse’’ and 

requested that the Coast Guard 

withdraw the DFR. The commenter 

agreed that ‘‘the Coast Guard is obliged 

to align Coast Guard regulations with 

the statutes’’ and did not oppose the 

changes to the regulation. The 

commenter argued, rather, that the Coast 

Guard should delay the rulemaking 

indefinitely and seek new legislation 

from Congress that limits every 

merchant mariner to serving a uniform 

maximum of 12 hours in a 24 hour 

period, except in an emergency. 

The DFR conforms Coast Guard 

regulations to existing law, under which 

affected mariners may earn one and a 

half days sea service credit for each 12- 

hour period of work. The commenter 

did not oppose granting such mariners 

such credit for time worked. Instead, the 

commenter took issue with the absence 

of statutory restrictions on the length of 

time certain mariners may be required 

to work. The commenter advocated that 

the Coast Guard delay updating the 

regulations and request that Congress 

amend the statute further. 

The DFR stated that ‘‘we may adopt, 

as final, those parts of this rule on 

which no adverse comment was 

received.’’ 80 FR 65166. The 

commenter’s requests are separable from 

the rule and raises issues well outside 

the scope of the rule. The rule will 

therefore go into effect as scheduled. 

Dated: January 14, 2016. 

J.G. Lantz, 

Director, Commercial Regulations and 

Standards, U.S. Coast Guard. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01101 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 


jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES