alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated October 6, 2008, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 14, 2008, (73 FR 60719), Hospira Inc., 1776 North Centennial Drive, McPherson, Kansas 67460-1247, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Remifentanil (9739), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                

The company plans to import Remifentanil for use in dosage form manufacturing.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the registration of Hospira, Inc. to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Hospira, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

Dated: January 9, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-732 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
----

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Corporation. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February                  1, 2007 |                                                                           |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                                                           |
|                              |                                                                           |
|                              | /s/                  Emory O. Berry                                            |   |
|                              | Emory                  O. Berry                                                |
|                              | Chief                  Financial Officer                                       |
|                              | (Principal                  Financial and Accounting                  Officer) |

----
From: "Cain, Randy D." <RCAIN2@alleghenyenergy.com> To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Cannon, William E." <WCA NNON@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P." <JLAPCEV@alleghenyene rgy.com> Date: 07/06/2010 11:28 AM Subject: Steam Electric Power Generating ICR - Harrison Power Station (07135) - Extension Request

July 6, 2010

Jezebele Alicea USEPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 4303TWashington, DC 20460 RE: Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines Allegheny Energy Harrison Power Station – Plant ID 07135

Dear Ms. Alicea: Allegheny Energy’s Harrison Power St ation received the EPA Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines on Friday, June 18, 2010. We have reviewed the ICR questionnaire (Version 1) and believe its breadth and depth of information require more time to complete. In accord with the instructions on the EPA cover letter, Allegheny Energy respectf ully requests an additional 30 days to provide responses. There are two reasons for this time extension request. First, Allegheny Energy initiated a merger with FirstEnergy of Akron, Ohio, on February 11, 2010. In order to support the merger and thoroughly explore the resulting synergies of the combined company numerous employees of Allegheny Energy were sent to Akron at the end of May for approximately a three month period. This has decreased an already lean staff to continue conducting business as usual in addition to responding to such inquiries as this ICR. Compounding the problem is potential attrition of Allegheny En ergy Corporate Services staff in anticipation of job loss associated with the combination of the two companies. Already, one key engineer that would have extensively worked on the ICR as left the company. In addition, the unprecedented issuance of a number of new regulatory proposals (e.g. CCRs, GHG MRR, GHG Ta iloring Rule), al ong with other ICRs (i.e. HAPs MACT and PCB) by EPA and state regulatory agencies has also added to the difficulty to provide thorough and meaningful responses by our limited staff. An additional 30 days would allow for Allegheny Energy and power station staffs to not only gather the necessary data required to support the ICR, but also would provide time to review the submittal for completeness and consistency. This additional 30 days in the response time will most likely lessen the need for further inquiry by EPA’s contractor (ERG) for purpose of explanation of the responses provided and possibly supplemental information requestto aide clarification. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Randy Cain

Randy Cain Environmental Affairs Manager Allegheny Energy 800 Cabin Hill Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 phone: 724-838-6004 fax: 724-830-7711 e-mail: rcain2@alleghenyenergy.com
IN RE: AGGRIEVED PRACTITIONER

NO. 2017-C-2085

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Charles L. Kelly, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              |  |               
|--------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|/s/ Charles L. Kelly, Jr.                    
|Charles L. Kelly, Jr. Chief Financial
Officer
|                                              | 
|Date:                                         |  | August 6, 2009
W.C., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1374

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14a AND 15d-14a
OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TRM Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 66




---



##### 



(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  November 14, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Jon S. PitcherJon S. PitcherPrincipal Accounting Officer 67
Anthony DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Teddy R. MAGEE

No. 2016-KP-2254

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Relator's remaining claims are repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A) ; *see also* *State v. Lee* , 14-2374, pp. 8-9 (La. 9/18/15), 181 So.3d 631, 638 (an "attempt to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it as a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing").

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
I CERTIFY THIS IS A CQPY OF A

DOCUMENT FILED ON



JUL 26 2000

FORM 19

(Section 348)

J. Powell

Certificate of

JOHN S. POWELL

Incorporation No. 604510

REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA





COMPANY ACT

SPECIAL RESOLUTION



The following Special Resolution was passed by the undermentioned company on the date stated:



Name of Company:

Copper Mountain Mines Ltd.

Date Resolution Passed:

July 20, 2000



Resolution:



"BE IT RESOLVED as a Special Resolution that:



Copper Mountain change its name from "Copper Mountain Mines Ltd." to "China Ventures Inc." or such other name as is acceptable to applicable regulatory authorities, such change in. name be effective concurrently with, or as soon. as possible after, the completion of the Arrangement described In the Information Circular."



A copy of the Altered Memorandum is attached hereto.



Certified a true copy this 25th day of July, 2000.



(Signed)_______________________

Signature







Solicitor_______________________

Relationship to Company
STATE of Louisiana v. Rubin ROBERTSON

NO. 2017-K-0969

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.
Rickie BUTTREE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                        471
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 6155
<ALLOWANCES>                  111
<INVENTORY>                   9799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              16899
<PP&E>                        7948
<DEPRECIATION>                4199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                23747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         7313
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      8
<OTHER-SE>                    12774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  23747
<SALES>                       22368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              22368
<CGS>                         17687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 21334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            288
<INCOME-PRETAX>               746
<INCOME-TAX>                  313
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           433
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .05
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 62 (Thursday, April 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14999-15000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1014, 1016, and 1017 (Review)]


Polyvinyl Alcohol From China, Japan, and Korea; Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on 
polyvinyl alcohol from China, Japan, and Korea would be likely to lead 
to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United

[[Page 15000]]

States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Vice Chairman Daniel R. Pearson dissenting with respect to 
Korea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on June 2, 2008 (73 FR 
31507) and determined on September 5, 2008 that it would conduct full 
reviews (73 FR 53443, September 16, 2008). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
September 22, 2008 (73 FR 54619). The hearing was held in Washington, 
DC, on January 27, 2009, and all persons who requested the opportunity 
were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on March 27, 2009. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4067 (March 2009), 
entitled Polyvinyl Alcohol from China, Japan, and Korea: Investigation 
Nos. 731-TA-1014, 1016, and 1017 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 27, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-7401 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE
IN the INTEREST OF F.W., a child.

T.W., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-732

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Discoveries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Judy M. Robinett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and principal financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/S/  JUDY M. ROBINETT
-------------------------------------
Judy M. Robinett
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004


                                       17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,870
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,374
<PP&E>                                          42,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,888
<CGS>                                           79,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,786
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47



</TABLE>
EX PARTE Richard HENLEY

1151223 (CR-15-1238)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.