## CalPortland Cement Plant Units 1-4
**Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions Relative to Base Used in Visibility Modeling All Units**  **Technology Used**  **-Emissions**

**(TPY, annual) Technology** 

**Used** **-Emissions**

**(TPY, annual)** **-Emissions**

**(TPY, annual) $/year if using** 

**MAT $/year if using LNB**  Base Case **Base** 0 0 0

- $

-

$ LNB or MAT u.1-3 **Ctrl2-1** LNB or MAT 561 0 561 497,565 $ 1,317,024

$ SNCR u. 1-3 **Ctrl2-2** SNCR 936 0 936 725,007 $ 725,007

$ LNB or MAT u.4 **Ctrl2-3** 0LNB or MAT 568 568 234,701 $ 535,613

$ SNCR u.4 **Ctrl2-4** 0SNCR 947 947 604,583 $ 604,583

$

**Table 3a. NO x** 

**Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Units 1-3***(from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3a) **Table 3b. NO x**  **Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Unit 4**(from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3b) **MAT LNB**  **SNCR LNB and SNCR**  **MAT or LNC LNB**  **SNCR LNB and SNCR**  capital $676,001 $2,708,493 $383,535 $3,092,028 capital $1,188,275 $3,427,320 $1,336,373 $4,763,693 Annualized Capital $63,809.67 $255,663 $36,203 $291,866 Annualized Capital $112,165 $323,515 $126,144 $449,659 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $102,045 $183,345 $90,347 $198,686 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $122,536 $212,098 $128,460 $265,553 Reagent $115,120 $80,584 Reagent $349,978 $244,985 Total Cost,$/year $165,855 $439,008 $241,669 $571,136 Total Cost,$/year $234,701 $535,613 $604,583 $960,197 Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% tons reduced 187 187 312 318 tons reduced 568 568 947 966 $/ton reduced $887 $2,349 $776 $1,798 $/ton reduced $413 $943 $638 $994 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $608 $3,098 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $976 $1,824 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) ($1,584) $1,010 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $182 $1,067 lb/hr emission rate 111 111 79 77 lb/hr emission rate 336 336 240 235 * Values shown areper unit 

## CalPortland Cement Units 1-4

visibility method 6, annual average background Using dv from area with highest impact (12 areas)

**if using MAT if using LNB** **if using MAT if using LNB**  **if using MAT if using LNB** 
**Base Case Base**  

### 0 $0.0 $0.0 1.2 **LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1**  

### 561 $0.5 $1.3 $887 $2,348 1.0 0.12 $4.2 $11.1 0 **SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2**  

### 936 $0.7 $0.7 $775 $775 1.0 0.19 $3.8 $3.8 0 **LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3**  

### 568 $0.2 $0.5 $413 $943 1.0 0.13 $1.8 $4.1 0 **SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4**  

### 947 $0.6 $0.6 $638 $638 0.9 0.22 $2.8 $2.8 0 (same tons & costs as above) Using dv sum over all areas (12 areas)

**if using MAT if using LNB** **if using MAT if using LNB**  **if using MAT if using LNB**  **Base Case Base**  

### 0 $0.0 $0.0 4.2 **LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1**  

### 561 $0.5 $1.3 $887 $2,348 3.8 0.43 $1.2 $3.0 **SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2**  

### 936 $0.7 $0.7 $775 $775 3.5 0.70 $1.0 $1.0 **LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3**  

### 568 $0.2 $0.5 $413 $943 3.7 0.49 $0.5 $1.1 **SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4**  

### 947 $0.6 $0.6 $638 $638 3.4 0.81 $0.7 $0.7 Controls **Control**

**Option Units 1-3**  **Unit 4**

**Control Option** 



### cost, $/yr (millions) **$/ton reduction All Units** 



### cost, $/yr (millions) **$/ton reduction visibility**  **impact, dv visibility benefit,** 

**dv** # CIAs w/ improvement≥ 0.5 dv Controls **ton/yr reduction** 

**$/dv (millions)** Controls **Control**

**Option** 

### ton/yr

**reduction visibility**  **impact, dv visibility benefit,** 

**dv $/dv (millions)** 

## Chemical Lime Company Nelson Units 2 and 3 visibility method 6, annual average background **Table 1(a). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options**

Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 CIA Base Case LNB or MAT u.1-3SNCR u.

1-3 LNB or MAT u.4SNCR u.4 Base Case LNB or MAT u.1-3SNCR u. 1-

3 LNB or

MAT u.4 SNCR u.4 chirChiricahua NM 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.04 chrwChiricahua 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.05 galiGaliuro 0.87 0.79 0.74 0.78 0.72 0.00 0.08 0.13 0.09 0.15 gilaGila 0.94 0.85 0.79 0.83 0.76 0.00 0.09 0.15 0.11 0.18
mazaMazatzal 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 mobaMount Baldy 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 pefoPetrified Forest 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 pimoPine Mountain 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 saguSaguaro 1.15 1.03 0.96 1.02 0.93 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.22 sianSierra Ancha 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 supeSuperstition 0.28 0.24 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.05 

### sycaSycamore Canyon 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 **Total** 4.22 3.79 3.51 3.72 3.41 0.00 0.43 0.70 0.49 0.81 **Max** 1.15 1.03 0.96 1.02 0.93 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.22 **# CIAs w/****-dv ≥ 0.5**  

### 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 # CIAs with visibility improvement≥ 0.5 dv

**Ta ble 5(a). Control Opon Cost Effecveness (million $/dv)†**  Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-4 CIA MAT u.1-3LNB u.1-3SNCR u. 1-3 MAT u.4LNB u.4SNCR u.4 chirChiricahua NM 23 60 19 9 21 14 chrwChiricahua 17.8 47.0 16.9 7.6 17.3 11.9 galiGaliuro 6.4 16.9 5.5 2.6 6.0 4.1 gilaGila 5.6 14.8 4.8 2.1 4.8 3.4
mazaMazatzal 49.8 131.7 42.6 18.1 41.2 24.2 mobaMount Baldy 49.8 131.7 42.6 21.3 48.7 31.8 pefoPetrified Forest 45.2 119.7 42.6 21.3 48.7 33.6 pimoPine Mountain 55.3 146.3 45.3 21.3 48.7 31.8 saguSaguaro 4.2 11.1 3.8 1.8 4.1 2.8 sianSierra Ancha 49.8 131.7 40.3 15.6 35.7 25.2($/yr) / (sum of dv benefits over all areas) supeSuperstition 13.8 36.6 14.2 7.3 16.7 12.6($/yr) / (max dv benefit of any area) 

### sycaSycamore Canyon 49.8 131.7 48.3 18.1 41.2 30.2 **$/dv_sum** 1.2 3.0 1.0 0.5 1.1 0.7 **$/dv_max** 4.2 11.1 3.8 1.8 4.1 2.8

†

### $/dv = $ per year from Table 2 divided by visibility improvement from Table 1(a) for each control option, in millions

**Class I Area Change relative to base (dv)**  **98 th** **Percentile****-dv**

Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-3 **Class I Area Table 1(a). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) at Each Class I Area (CIA) Within CalPortland Cement Plant's Zone of Influence (300 km) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options (listed in Table 2)**  **CIA Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions Relative to Base Used in Visibility Modeling** 

**Base Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3**  **Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3**  **Ctrl2-4 Base**  **Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2**  **Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4**  **Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2**  **Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4** **Base Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3**  **Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3**  **Ctrl2-4 Base**  **Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2**  **Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4**  **Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2**  **Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4**  chir 0.204 0.180 0.164 0.176 0.157 0.024 0.040 0.028 0.047 0.209 0.185 0.168 0.182 0.163 0.024 0.041 0.027 0.046 0.199 0.177 0.162 0.176 0.161 0.022 0.037 0.023 0.038 0.204 0.182 0.165 0.178 0.161 0.022 0.039 0.026 0.043 chrw 0.207 0.183 0.168 0.178 0.159 0.024 0.039 0.029 0.048 0.290 0.251 0.225 0.254 0.228 0.039 0.065 0.036 0.062 0.215 0.186 0.167 0.188 0.171 0.029 0.048 0.027 0.044 0.223 0.195 0.180 0.192 0.172 0.028 0.043 0.031 0.051 Base 0 0 0 $0 $0 gali 0.843 0.748 0.684 0.744 0.667 0.095 0.159 0.099 0.176 1.085 0.968 0.889 0.940 0.842 0.117 0.196 0.145 0.243 0.797 0.704 0.641 0.695 0.627 0.093 0.156 0.102 0.170 0.871 0.793 0.740 0.782 0.724 0.078 0.131 0.089 0.147 Ctrl2-1 LNB or MAT 561 0 561$497,565$1,317,024 gila 0.873 0.775 0.709 0.771 0.696 0.098 0.164 0.102 0.177 1.129 1.008 0.930 0.979 0.877 0.121 0.199 0.150 0.252 0.826 0.730 0.665 0.721 0.650 0.096 0.161 0.105 0.176 0.937 0.848 0.787 0.825 0.757 0.089 0.150 0.112 0.180 Ctrl2-2 SNCR 936 0 936$725,007 $725,007

maza 0.127 0.112 0.102 0.107 0.093 0.015 0.025 0.020 0.034 0.129 0.115 0.108 0.113 0.103 0.014 0.021 0.016 0.026 0.083 0.074 0.069 0.073 0.066 0.009 0.014 0.010 0.017 0.110 0.100 0.093 0.097 0.085 0.010 0.017 0.013 0.025 Ctrl2-3 0LNB or MAT 568 568$234,701 $535,613 moba 0.083 0.075 0.069 0.072 0.065 0.008 0.014 0.011 0.018 0.080 0.071 0.066 0.068 0.060 0.009 0.014 0.012 0.020 0.059 0.053 0.049 0.050 0.044 0.006 0.010 0.009 0.015 0.079 0.069 0.062 0.068 0.060 0.010 0.017 0.011 0.019 Ctrl2-4 0SNCR 947 947$604,583 $604,583 pefo 0.095 0.081 0.072 0.082 0.074 0.014 0.023 0.013 0.021 0.081 0.072 0.065 0.071 0.063 0.009 0.016 0.010 0.018 0.072 0.064 0.059 0.061 0.053 0.008 0.013 0.011 0.019 0.083 0.072 0.066 0.072 0.065 0.011 0.017 0.011 0.018 pimo 0.101 0.089 0.080 0.086 0.076 0.012 0.021 0.015 0.025 0.111 0.099 0.091 0.093 0.081 0.012 0.020 0.018 0.030 0.050 0.045 0.042 0.043 0.039 0.005 0.008 0.007 0.011 0.094 0.085 0.078 0.083 0.075 0.009 0.016 0.011 0.019 **Table 3a. NO x** **Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Units 1-3***(from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3a) **Table 3b. NO x** **Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Unit 4**(from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3b)
sagu 1.142 0.989 0.895 1.022 0.934 0.153 0.247 0.120 0.208 1.216 1.099 1.012 1.102 1.043 0.117 0.204 0.114 0.173 0.953 0.858 0.794 0.882 0.834 0.095 0.159 0.071 0.119 1.152 1.033 0.962 1.022 0.934 0.119 0.190 0.130 0.218 **MAT LNB**  **SNCR LNB and SNCR**  **MAT or LNC LNB**  **SNCR LNB and SNCR**  sian 0.119 0.110 0.100 0.107 0.095 0.009 0.019 0.012 0.024 0.120 0.110 0.104 0.099 0.090 0.010 0.016 0.021 0.030 0.101 0.090 0.082 0.088 0.079 0.011 0.019 0.013 0.022 0.113 0.103 0.095 0.098 0.089 0.010 0.018 0.015 0.024 capital $676,001#########$383,535 $3,092,028 capital $1,188,275########################### supe 0.286 0.253 0.233 0.252 0.233 0.033 0.053 0.034 0.053 0.264 0.240 0.225 0.233 0.213 0.024 0.039 0.031 0.051 0.226 0.202 0.186 0.214 0.191 0.024 0.040 0.012 0.035 0.276 0.240 0.225 0.244 0.228 0.036 0.051 0.032 0.048 Annualized Capital $63,810$255,663 $36,203 $291,866 Annualized Capital $112,165$323,515$126,144$449,659 syca 0.081 0.071 0.064 0.068 0.060 0.010 0.017 0.013 0.021 0.078 0.071 0.068 0.067 0.060 0.007 0.010 0.011 0.018 0.052 0.046 0.041 0.045 0.040 0.006 0.011 0.007 0.012 0.075 0.065 0.060 0.062 0.055 0.010 0.015 0.013 0.020 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $102,045$183,345 $90,347 $198,686 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes)$122,536$212,098$128,460$265,553 Reagent $115,120 $80,584 Reagent $349,978$244,985 sjb, 2012-10-08: To correctly reflect modeled controls, Ctrl2-1 and Ctrl2-2 were exchanged with Ctrl2-3 and Ctrl2-4, respectively. Total Cost,$/year $165,855$439,008$241,669 $571,136 Total Cost,$/year $234,701$535,613$604,583$960,197 The columns now reflect EPA original names c21, c22, c23, c24, and POSTUTIL output ctrl3, ctrl4, ctrl1, and ctrl2, respectively. Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% tons reduced 187 187 312 318 tons reduced 568 568 947 966 $/ton reduced $887 $2,349 $776 $1,798 $/ton reduced $413 $943 $638 $994 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $608 $3,098 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $976 $1,824 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) ($1,584) $1,010 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $182 $1,067 lb/hr emission rate 111 111 79 77 lb/hr emission rate 336 336 240 235 * Values shown areper unit**Units 1-3** 

**- Emis**  **(TPY) 98th Percentile** **-dv Change relative to base (dv)**  **Change relative to base (dv) $/year if**  **using LNB All Units**  **98th Percentile****-dv**
**Control Unit 4**  

**- Emis (TPY)** 

**- Emis** 

**(TPY) $/year if** 

**using MAT Control Option**  **Control 2001**  **2003 98th Percentile** **-dv Change relative to base (dv)**  **98th Percentile****-dv Change relative to base (dv)**  **2002 2001-2003** 

## CalPortland Cement Units 1-4
**Table 2. Control Options (per EPA Region 9) and Corresponding Emission Reductions Relative to Base Used in Visibility Modeling All Units**  **Technology Used**  **-Emissions**

**(TPY, annual) Technology** 

**Used** **-Emissions**

**(TPY, annual)** **-Emissions**

**(TPY, annual) $/year if** 

**using MAT $/year if using LNB**  Base Case **Base** 0 0 0

- $

-

$ LNB or MAT u.1-3 **Ctrl2-1** LNB or MAT 561 0 561 497,565 $ 1,317,024

$ SNCR u. 1-3 **Ctrl2-2** SNCR 936 0 936 725,007 $ 725,007

$ LNB or MAT u.4 **Ctrl2-3** 0LNB or MAT 568 568 234,701 $ 535,613

$ SNCR u.4 **Ctrl2-4** 0SNCR 947 947 604,583 $ 604,583

$

**Table 3a. NO x** 

**Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Units 1-3***(from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3a) **Table 3b. NO x**  **Control Technologies for CalPortland Cement Unit 4**(from Andover Technology Partners Report Table 5-3b) **MAT LNB**  **SNCR LNB and SNCR**  **MAT or LNC LNB**  **SNCR LNB and SNCR**  capital $676,001 $2,708,493 $383,535 $3,092,028 capital $1,188,275 $3,427,320 $1,336,373 $4,763,693 Annualized Capital $63,810 $255,663 $36,203 $291,866 Annualized Capital $112,165 $323,515 $126,144 $449,659 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $102,045 $183,345 $90,347 $198,686 FOM (incl. admin, insur, taxes) $122,536 $212,098 $128,460 $265,553 Reagent $115,120 $80,584 Reagent $349,978 $244,985 Total Cost,$/year $165,855 $439,008 $241,669 $571,136 Total Cost,$/year $234,701 $535,613 $604,583 $960,197 Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% Percent Reduced 30% 30% 50% 51% tons reduced 187 187 312 318 tons reduced 568 568 947 966 $/ton reduced $887 $2,349 $776 $1,798 $/ton reduced $413 $943 $638 $994 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $608 $3,098 Incremental $/ton (compared to MAT) $976 $1,824 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) ($1,584) $1,010 Incremental $/ton (compared to LNB) $182 $1,067 lb/hr emission rate 111 111 79 77 lb/hr emission rate 336 336 240 235 * Values shown areper unit 

## CalPortland Cement Units 1-4

visibility method 8, 20% best background Using dv from area with highest impact (12 CIAs)

**if using MAT if using LNB** **if using MAT if using LNB**  **if using MAT if using LNB** 
**Base Case Base**  

### 0 $0.0 $0.0 1.3 **LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1**  

### 561 $0.5 $1.3 $887 $2,348 1.1 0.15 $3.4 $9.1 0 **SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2**  

### 936 $0.7 $0.7 $775 $775 1.0 0.22 $3.3 $3.3 0 **LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3**  

### 568 $0.2 $0.5 $413 $943 1.1 0.17 $1.4 $3.2 0 **SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4**  

### 947 $0.6 $0.6 $638 $638 4.0 0.26 $2.3 $2.3 0 (same tons & costs as above) Using dv sum over all areas (12 areas)

**if using MAT if using LNB** **if using MAT if using LNB**  **if using MAT if using LNB**  **Base Case Base**  

### 0 $0.0 $0.0 5.0 **LNB or MAT u.1-3 Ctrl2-1**  

### 561 $0.5 $1.3 $887 $2,348 4.4 0.54 $0.9 $2.4 **SNCR u. 1-3 Ctrl2-2**  

### 936 $0.7 $0.7 $775 $775 4.1 0.89 $0.8 $0.8 **LNB or MAT u.4 Ctrl2-3**  

### 568 $0.2 $0.5 $413 $943 4.3 0.62 $0.4 $0.9 **SNCR u.4 Ctrl2-4**  

### 947 $0.6 $0.6 $638 $638 0.1 1.01 $0.6 $0.6 **visibility benefit, dv**  **$/dv (millions) Control**  **Option Units 1-3** 



### $/dv (millions) **$/ton reduction visibility** 

**impact, dv visibility** 

**benefit, dv**

Controls **Control**

**Option** 

### ton/yr

**reduction cost, $/yr (millions)**  **$/ton reduction visibility**  **impact, dv** Controls **Control**

**Option** 

### ton/yr

**reduction cost, $/yr (millions)**  # CIAs w/ improvement ≥0.5 dv **Unit 4** 

### Controls **All Units**

# CalPortland Cement Units 1-4 visibility method 8, 20% best background Table 1(b). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options

Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4 Base Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4

Base Case LNB or

MAT u.1-3SNCR u.

1-3 LNB or MAT u.4SNCR u.4 Base CaseLNB or MAT u.1-3 SNCR u. 1-3LNB or MAT u.4 SNCR u.4 

## chirChiricahua NM 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.05 chrwChiricahua 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.05 galiGaliuro 1.02 0.91 0.84 0.90 0.83 0.00 0.11 0.18 0.13 0.19 gilaGila 1.23 1.11 1.02 1.07 0.97 0.00 0.12 0.21 0.17 0.26
mazaMazatzal 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 mobaMount Baldy 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 pefoPetrified Forest 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 pimoPine Mountain 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 saguSaguaro 1.26 1.12 1.04 1.12 1.02 0.00 0.15 0.22 0.14 0.24 sianSierra Ancha 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 supeSuperstition 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.27 0.24 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.06 sy caSy camore Canyon 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02

**Total** 4.97 4.43 4.08 4.35 3.96 0.54 0.89 0.62 1.01 **Max** 1.26 1.12 1.04 1.12 1.02 0.15 0.22 0.17 0.26 **# CIAs w/****-dv ≥ 0.5**  3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0

**Ta ble 5(b). Control Opon Cost Effecveness (million $/dv)†**  Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-4
CIA MAT u.1-3LNB u.1-3SNCR u. 1-3 MAT u.4LNB u.4SNCR u.4 

## chirChiricahua NM 19.1 50.7 16.1 7.8 17.9 12.1 chrwChiricahua 19.1 50.7 16.5 7.3 16.7 11.2 galiGaliuro 4.7 12.3 4.0 1.9 4.3 3.1 gilaGila 4.1 10.8 3.4 1.4 3.2 2.3
mazaMazatzal 45.2 119.7 38.2 16.8 38.3 21.6 mobaMount Baldy 31.1 82.3 29.0 14.7 33.5 22.4 pefoPetrified Forest 35.5 94.1 31.5 15.6 35.7 24.2 pimoPine Mountain 45.2 119.7 40.3 18.1 41.2 26.3 saguSaguaro 3.4 9.1 3.3 1.6 3.7 2.5 sianSierra Ancha 38.3 101.3 34.5 13.0 29.8 21.6 supeSuperstition 13.4 35.6 12.3 7.8 17.9 10.4 sy caSy camore Canyon 49.8 131.7 42.6 16.8 38.3 26.3

**$/dv_sum** 0.9 2.4 0.8 0.4 0.9 0.6($/yr) / (sum of dv benefits over all areas) **$/dv_max** 3.4 9.1 3.3 1.4 3.2 2.3 ($/yr) / (max dv benefit of any area) **Class I Area**



## †$/dv = $ per y

ear from T

able 2 divided by

visibility improvement from T

able 1(b) for each control option, in millions # CIAs with visibility improvement≥0.5 dv **Class I Area** CIA 

## Change relative to Base (dv) **98 th** 

## Percentile**-dv**

Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-3

# Table 4(b). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) at Each Class I Area (CIA) Within CalPortland Cement Plant's Zone of Influence (300 km) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options (listed in Table 2)

**CIA Change relative to base (dv)** 

**Base Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3**  **Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2** chir 

# 0.231 0.198 0.177 0.203 0.186 0.033 0.054 chrw 

# 0.229 0.196 0.175 0.202 0.186 0.033 0.054 gali 

# 0.968 0.852 0.761 0.857 0.783 0.116 0.207 gila 

# 1.144 1.008 0.916 1.014 0.926 0.136 0.228
maza 

# 0.145 0.122 0.106 0.128 0.116 0.023 0.039 moba 

# 0.113 0.098 0.088 0.101 0.093 0.015 0.025 pefo 

# 0.119 0.103 0.092 0.102 0.091 0.016 0.027 pimo 

# 0.118 0.101 0.089 0.104 0.094 0.017 0.029 sagu 

# 1.253 1.119 1.022 1.080 0.962 0.134 0.231 sian 

# 0.137 0.122 0.109 0.123 0.115 0.015 0.028 supe 

# 0.319 0.274 0.255 0.282 0.259 0.045 0.064 syca 0.104 0.089 0.079 0.090 0.081 0.015 0.025

Changes made by EPA to this UNC spreadsheet sjb, 2012-10-08: To correctly reflect modeled controls, Ctrl2-1 and Ctrl2-2 were exchanged with Ctrl2-3 and Ctrl2-4, respectively. The columns now reflect EPA original names c21, c22, c23, c24, and POSTUTIL output ctrl3, ctrl4, ctrl1, and ctrl2, respectively. These changes are *NOT* reflected in the UNC Task 9 report tables for impacts, benefits, $/dv, etc. (its tables 31 - 34) sjb, 2013-12-23: Added table (at right) for 98th percentile as average of 2001, 2002, and 2003 values. sjb, 2014-01-14: Note that chir, chrw, gali, and gila results are all incorrect: chir used chrw's receptors, chrw used chir+chrw, gali used chir+chrw+gali, gila used chir+chrw+gali+gila

**98th Percentile****-dv 2001** 

# Table 4(b). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) at Each Class I Area (CIA) Within CalPortland Cement Plant's Zone of Influence (300 km) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options (listed in Table 2)
**Change relative to base (dv) 98th Percentile** **-dv**

**Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4** **Base Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3** **Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1**  0.028 0.045 0.233 0.205 0.186 0.201 0.181 0.028 0.027 0.043 0.326 0.290 0.261 0.282 0.252 0.036 0.111 0.185 1.145 1.053 0.993 1.017 0.934 0.092 0.130 0.218 1.379 1.270 1.198 1.211 1.100 0.109 0.017 0.029 0.151 0.135 0.125 0.131 0.120 0.016 0.012 0.020 0.110 0.097 0.089 0.093 0.082 0.013 0.017 0.028 0.101 0.089 0.081 0.088 0.080 0.012 0.014 0.024 0.131 0.116 0.107 0.110 0.095 0.015 0.173 0.291 1.335 1.198 1.105 1.187 1.110 0.137 0.014 0.022 0.139 0.127 0.117 0.114 0.102 0.012 0.037 0.060 0.290 0.263 0.245 0.255 0.232 0.027 0.014 0.023 0.101 0.088 0.078 0.083 0.073 0.013
sjb, 2012-10-08: To correctly reflect modeled controls, Ctrl2-1 and Ctrl2-2 were exchanged with Ctrl2-3 and Ctrl2-4, respectively. The columns now reflect EPA original names c21, c22, c23, c24, and POSTUTIL output ctrl3, ctrl4, ctrl1, and ctrl2, respectively. These changes are *NOT* reflected in the UNC Task 9 report tables for impacts, benefits, $/dv, etc. (its tables 31 - 34) sjb, 2013-12-23: Added table (at right) for 98th percentile as average of 2001, 2002, and 2003 values. sjb, 2014-01-14: Note that chir, chrw, gali, and gila results are all incorrect: chir used chrw's receptors, chrw used chir+chrw, gali used chir+chrw+gali, gila used chir+chrw+gali+gila **Change relative to base (dv) 2002** 

# Table 4(b). Visibility Impairment (98th Percentile) at Each Class I Area (CIA) Within CalPortland Cement Plant's Zone of Influence (300 km) for 2001-2003 Base Case Emissions and Control Options (listed in Table 2)

**Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3**  **Ctrl2-4 Base**  **Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2** **Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4**  0.047 0.032 0.052 0.234 0.208 0.191 0.205 0.185 0.065 0.044 0.074 0.246 0.218 0.200 0.207 0.187 0.152 0.128 0.211 0.917 0.808 0.735 0.798 0.718 0.181 0.168 0.279 1.086 0.958 0.872 0.946 0.852 0.026 0.020 0.031 0.096 0.086 0.078 0.083 0.075 0.021 0.017 0.028 0.081 0.071 0.066 0.068 0.060 0.020 0.013 0.021 0.094 0.083 0.077 0.079 0.069 0.024 0.021 0.036 0.058 0.052 0.048 0.050 0.045 0.230 0.148 0.225 1.022 0.915 0.843 0.941 0.887 0.022 0.025 0.037 0.114 0.101 0.093 0.100 0.088 0.045 0.035 0.058 0.249 0.221 0.203 0.235 0.212 0.023 0.018 0.028 0.063 0.055 0.050 0.054 0.048

sjb, 2014-01-14: Note that chir, chrw, gali, and gila results are all incorrect: chir used chrw's receptors, chrw used chir+chrw, gali used chir+chrw+gali, gila used chir+chrw+gali+gila **Change relative to base (dv) 98th Percentile** **-dv 2003** 

# Ctrl2-1 **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3** **Ctrl2-4 Base**  **Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2** **Ctrl2-3**

0.026 0.043 0.029 0.049 0.231 0.205 0.186 0.201 0.028 0.046 0.039 0.059 0.246 0.220 0.202 0.214 0.109 0.182 0.119 0.199 1.020 0.913 0.837 0.895 0.128 0.214 0.140 0.234 1.234 1.112 1.021 1.066 0.010 0.018 0.013 0.021 0.125 0.114 0.106 0.111 0.010 0.015 0.013 0.021 0.108 0.092 0.083 0.092 0.011 0.017 0.015 0.025 0.105 0.091 0.082 0.090 0.006 0.010 0.008 0.013 0.110 0.099 0.092 0.097 0.107 0.179 0.081 0.135 1.262 1.117 1.044 1.119 0.013 0.021 0.014 0.026 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.028 0.046 0.014 0.037 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.27 0.008 0.013 0.009 0.015 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08
2001-2003, using average of 2001, 2002, and 2003 values

area **Base Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3**  chir 

# 0.233 0.204 0.185 0.203 chrw 

# 0.267 0.235 0.212 0.230 gali 

# 1.010 0.904 0.830 0.891 gila 

# 1.203 1.079 0.995 1.057
maza 

# 0.131 0.114 0.103 0.114 moba 

# 0.101 0.089 0.081 0.087 pefo 

# 0.105 0.092 0.083 0.090 pimo 

# 0.102 0.090 0.081 0.088 sagu 

# 1.203 1.077 0.990 1.069 sian 

# 0.130 0.117 0.106 0.112 supe 

# 0.286 0.253 0.234 0.257 syca 0.089 0.077 0.069 0.076 **Change relative to base (dv)**

**98th Percentile****-dv 98th Percentile** **-dv**

# Ctrl2-4**Ctrl2-1 Ctrl2-2** **Ctrl2-3 Ctrl2-4** 

0.181 0.026 0.045 0.030 0.050 0.192 0.026 0.044 0.032 0.054 0.826 0.107 0.183 0.125 0.194 0.974 0.122 0.213 0.168 0.260 0.097 0.011 0.019 0.014 0.028 0.081 0.016 0.025 0.016 0.027 0.080 0.014 0.023 0.015 0.025 0.087 0.011 0.018 0.013 0.023 1.022 0.145 0.218 0.143 0.240 0.10 0.013 0.021 0.018 0.028 0.24 0.037 0.059 0.030 0.058 0.07 0.010 0.017 0.014 0.023
2001-2003, using average of 2001, 2002, and 2003 values

**Ctrl2-4 Ctrl2-1**  **Ctrl2-2 Ctrl2-3**  **Ctrl2-4** 0.184 0.029 0.048 0.030 0.049 0.208 0.032 0.055 0.037 0.059 0.812 0.106 0.180 0.119 0.198 0.959 0.124 0.208 0.146 0.244 0.104 0.016 0.028 0.017 0.027 0.078 0.013 0.020 0.014 0.023 0.080 0.013 0.021 0.015 0.025 0.078 0.013 0.021 0.014 0.024 0.986 0.126 0.213 0.134 0.217 0.102 0.013 0.024 0.018 0.028 0.234 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.052 0.067 0.012 0.020 0.014 0.022 LNB u123SNCR u123LNB u4 SNCR u4 **Change relative to base (dv) 2001-2003**  **Change relative to base (dv)**

# lookup tables includes areas for: TEP Sundt, Catalyst Paper/Snowflake, Chemical Lime Nelson, AEPCO Apache, APS Cholla, SRP Coronado

CalPortland Cement Control scenarios Class I areas scenarios units 1-3 unit 4 short abbrClass I area Class I area, medium Class I area, long state

Base None None Base Case bandBandelier Bandelier NM Bandelier NM NM Ctrl2-1 LNB or MAT None LNB or MAT u.1-3 brcaBryce Canyon Bryce Canyon NP Bryce Canyon NP UT Ctrl2-2 SNCR None SNCR u. 1-3 careCapitol Reef Capitol Reef NP Capitol Reef NP UT Ctrl2-3 None LNB or MAT LNB or MAT u.4 chir Chiricahua NM Chiricahua NM Chiricahua NM AZ Ctrl2-4 None SNCR SNCR u.4 chrwChiricahua Chiricahua Wild. Chiricahua Wilderness AZ gali Galiuro Galiuro Wild. Galiuro Wilderness AZ gila Gila Gila Wild. Gila Wilderness NM grcaGrand Canyon Grand Canyon NP Grand Canyon NP AZ jotr Joshua Tree Joshua Tree NP Joshua Tree NP CA
mazaMazatzal Mazatzal Wild. Mazatzal Wilderness AZ
meveMesa Verde Mesa Verde NP Mesa Verde NP CO mobaMount Baldy Mount Baldy Wild. Mount Baldy Wilderness AZ pefoPetrified Forest Petrified Forest NP Petrified Forest NP AZ pimoPine Mountain Pine Mountain Wild. Pine Mountain Wilderness AZ saguSaguaro Saguaro NP Saguaro NP AZ sapeSan Pedro ParksSan Pedro Parks Wild.San Pedro Parks Wilderness NM sianSierra Ancha Sierra Ancha Wild. Sierra Ancha Wilderness AZ supeSuperstition Superstition Wild. Superstition Wilderness AZ sycaSycamore CanyonSycamore Canyon Wild.Sycamore Canyon Wilderness AZ zionZion Zion NP Zion NP UT