1238 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 10, 2018 / Notices 

6See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 351.309(d)(2). 

9See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

10See 19 CFR 351.310. 

11See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

1See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results and 

Preliminary Rescission of New Shipper Review; 

2015–2016, 82 FR 31301 (July 6, 2017) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tapered Roller Bearings 

and Parts Thereof, Finished or Unfinished, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline 

for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative, and New Shipper Review,’’ dated 

October 16, 2017. 

3See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; Tapered 

Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished or 

Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China, 

52 FR 22667 (June 15, 1987) (Order). 

4For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Rescission of New 

Shipper Review: Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from the 

People’s Republic of China; 2015–2016,’’ dated 

publication of these preliminary 

results.6 Interested parties may submit 

written comments (case briefs) within 

30 days of publication of the 

preliminary results and rebuttal 

comments (rebuttal briefs) within five 

days after the time limit for filing case 

briefs.7 Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be 

limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs. Parties who submit arguments are 

requested to submit with the argument: 

(1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.8 All briefs must be 

filed electronically using ACCESS. 

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must do so within 30 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

by submitting a written request to the 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance using Enforcement and 

Compliance’s ACCESS system.9

Requests should contain the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number, 

the number of participants, and a list of 

the issues to be discussed. If a request 

for a hearing is made, we will inform 

parties of the scheduled date for the 

hearing which will be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, at a time and location to be 

determined.10 Issues addressed at the 

hearing will be limited to those raised 

in the briefs.11

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of our analysis of 

the issues raised by the parties in their 

comments, within 120 days after 

issuance of these preliminary results. 

This administrative review and notice 

are in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: January 2, 2018. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Subsidies Valuation Information 

A. Allocation Period 

B. Attribution of Subsidies 

C. Benchmark Interest Rates 

V. Analysis of Programs Preliminarily 

Determined To Be Countervailable 

A. Deduction From Taxable Income for 

Export Revenue 

B. Short-Term Pre-Shipment Rediscount 

Program 

C. Provision of Hot-Rolled Steel for Less 

Than Adequate Remuneration 

D. Inward Processing Certificate Exemption 

E. Investment Encouragement Program: 

Customs Duty and Value Added Tax 

Exemptions 

VI. Programs Preliminarily Determined to 

Not Be Used 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–00262 Filed 1–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, and Rescission 

of New Shipper Review; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 29, 2017, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the preliminary results of the 

29th administrative and new shipper 

reviews of the antidumping duty order 

on tapered roller bearings and parts 

thereof, finished and unfinished (TRBs), 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China). The period of review (POR) is 

June 1, 2015, through May 31, 2016. 

After analyzing the comments received, 

we have made changes to the final 

results of the administrative review. We 

are also rescinding the new shipper 

review (NSR). The final weightedaverage dumping margins for the 

reviewed firms in the administrative 

review are listed below in the section 

entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ 

DATES: Applicable January 10, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Medley or Whitley Herndon, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4987 or 

(202) 482–6274, respectively. 

Background 

These final results of administrative 

review cover three exporters of the 

subject merchandise, GSP Automotive 

Group Wenzhou Co. Ltd. (GSP), 

Hangzhou Yonggu Auto-Parts Co., Ltd. 

(Hangzhou Yonggu), and Zhejiang CTL 

Auto Parts Manufacturing Incorporated 

Co., Ltd. (CTL), as well as three 

additional companies, Zhejiang 

Zhaofeng Mechanical & Electronic Co., 

Ltd. (Zhaofeng), Yantai CMC Bearing 

Company Limited (Yantai CMC), and 

Zhejiang Zhengda Bearing Co., Ltd. 

(Zhengda), which do not qualify for 

separate rates. With respect to these 

later companies, we are treating them as 

part of the China-wide entity. The NSR 

covers Zhejiang Jingli Bearing 

Technology Co. Ltd. (Zhejiang Jingli). 

On July 6, 2017, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results.1 In the 

Preliminary Results, we found that 

Zhejiang Jingli’s sale to the United 

States was not bona fide, as required by 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Therefore, we indicated that we 

intended to rescind the NSR. 

In August 2017, we received case 

briefs from the petitioner, Zhaofeng, and 

Yantai CMC, and in September 2017, we 

received rebuttal briefs from the 

petitioner and Zhaofeng. In October 

2017, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the final results by 60 days to 

January 2, 2018.2 Commerce conducted 

this review in accordance with section 

751 of the Act. 

Scope of the Order 3

The merchandise covered by the order 

includes tapered roller bearings and 

parts thereof. The subject merchandise 

is currently classifiable under 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

8482.20.00, 8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 

8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 

8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 

8483.90.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 

8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 

8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180. The 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes 

only; the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive.4


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 10, 2018 / Notices 1239 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

5See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 31302–03 and 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 10–11. 

6See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2015–2016, 81 FR 62717 (September 12, 

2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum at 10–11, unchanged in Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 

11431 (February 23, 2017). 

7See, Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, and Rescission of New 

Shipper Review; 2014–2015, 82 FR 4844 (January 

17, 2017). 

8See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 31302. 

9See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity (NME) in NME Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 

2013). 

10See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

11 Id., 77 FR at 8102. 

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that evidence provided by CTL, GSP, 

Hangzhou Yonggu, and Zhaofeng 

supported finding an absence of both de 

jure and de facto government control, 

and, therefore, we preliminarily granted 

a separate rate to each of these 

companies.5 We received no 

information since the issuance of the 

Preliminary Results that provides a basis 

for reconsidering these determinations 

with respect to CTL, GSP, and 

Hangzhou Yonggu. Therefore, for the 

final results, we continue to find that 

CTL, GSP, and Hangzhou Yonggu are 

eligible for separate rates. 

With respect to Zhaofeng, however, 

based upon information obtained from 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP), 

we have determined that Zhaofeng’s 

submitted information is unreliable in 

its entirety. Thus, we find that this 

information cannot serve as a basis for 

reaching a determination in this review. 

As a result, we find that Zhaofeng was 

unable to support its separate rates 

claim, and we find Zhaofeng to be a part 

of the China-wide entity. For further 

discussion, see Comment 1 of the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Further, with respect to Yantai CMC 

and Zhengda, we determined in the 

Preliminary Results that these 

companies failed to demonstrate an 

absence of de facto government control, 

and, thus, Commerce did not grant 

Yantai CMC and Zhengda a separate 

rate. For these final results, we continue 

to find, based on record evidence, that 

Yantai CMC and Zhengda failed to 

demonstrate an absence of de facto 

government control. Accordingly, we 

are not granting Yantai CMC and 

Zhengda a separate rate. For further 

discussion of this issue with respect to 

Yantai CMC, see Comments 3 through 5 

of the accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for 

the Non-Examined, Separate-Rate 

Companies 

For these final results, we have not 

calculated any individual rates or 

assigned a rate based on facts available. 

Therefore, consistent with our recent 

practice,6 we determine to assign to the 

non-individually examined separate rate 

companies the rate assigned to the 

separate rate companies in the most 

recently-completed administrative 

review of the order, which is zero.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this 

administrative review are addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

A list of the issues which parties raised 

and to which we respond in the Issues 

and Decision Memo is attached to this 

notice as an Appendix. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov, and it is available to 

all parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room B8024 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://trade.gov/enforcement. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have 

determined that Zhaofeng is not eligible 

for a separate rate. 

Rescission of New Shipper Review 

No party commented on the new 

shipper review for these final results. As 

explained in the Preliminary Results, 

Commerce finds that Zhejiang Jingli’s 

sale is non-bona fide.8 Because the nonbona fide sale was the only reported sale 

of subject merchandise during the POR, 

and, thus, there are no reviewable 

transactions, Commerce is rescinding 

the NSR. 

Period of Review 

The POR is June 1, 2015, through May 

31, 2016. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

Because Yantai CMC, Zhaofeng, and 

Zhengda did not demonstrate that they 

are entitled to a separate rate, Commerce 

finds Yantai CMC, Zhaofeng, and 

Zhengda to be part of the China-wide 

entity. No party requested a review of 

the China-wide entity. Therefore, we 

did not conduct a review of the Chinawide entity and the entity’s rate is not 

subject to change.9 The rate previously 

established for the China-wide entity is 

92.84 percent. 

Additionally, we are assigning the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins to the firms listed below for the 

period June 1, 2015, through May 31, 

2016: 

Exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

GSP Automotive Group 

Wenzhou Co. Ltd * .................. 0.00 

Hangzhou Yonggu Auto-Parts 

Co., Ltd * ................................. 0.00 

Zhejiang CTL Auto Parts Manufacturing Incorporated Co., 

Ltd * ......................................... 0.00 

* This company demonstrated eligibility for a 

separate rate in this administrative review. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise, where applicable, in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of review. 

Pursuant to the Final Modification for 

Reviews,10 because the above-listed 

respondents’ weighted-average dumping 

margins are zero, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.11

For Yantai CMC, Zhaofeng, and 

Zhengda, because Commerce 

determined that these companies did 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
1240 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 10, 2018 / Notices 

1See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 42285 

(September 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Petitioners’ Case Brief, ‘‘Re: Certain Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from Turkey: Case Brief,’’ 

dated October 10, 2017 (the petitioners’ case brief); 

and Toscelik’s Rebuttal Brief, ‘‘Re: Oil Country 

Tubular Goods from Turkey; Toscelik rebuttal 

brief,’’ submitted on October 16, 2017 (Toscelik’s 

rebuttal brief). Note that Toscelik’s rebuttal brief 

was timely filed but dated incorrectly with an 

August 9, 2016, date. 

not qualify for a separate rate, we will 

instruct CBP to assess dumping duties 

on the companies’ entries of subject 

merchandise at the rate of 92.84 percent. 

For Zhejiang Jingli, because 

Commerce rescinded the NSR, we will 

instruct CBP to assess dumping duties 

on the company’s entries of subject 

merchandise at the rate China-wide rate 

of 92.84 percent. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review (except, 

if the rate is de minimis, then a cash 

deposit rate of zero will be established 

for that company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed China and nonChina exporters not listed above that 

currently have a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where the exporter received 

that separate rate; (3) for all China 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate for the China-wide entity, 

92.84 percent; and (4) for all non-China 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the China exporter 

that supplied that non-China exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notifications to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notifications to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of review in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: January 2, 2018. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Zhaofeng’s Unreported U.S. 

Sales 

Comment 2: Other Issues for Zhaofeng 

Comment 3: Rejection of Yantai CMC’s 

Separate Rates Application 

Comment 4: Legal Authority To Assign a 

China-Wide Rate 

Comment 5: Whether the China-Wide Rate 

is Under Review 

5. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2018–00242 Filed 1–9–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–816] 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

From Turkey: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 7, 2017, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of antidumping 

duty order on certain oil country tubular 

goods (OCTG) from Turkey. Based on 

our analysis of the comments received, 

we find that subject merchandise has 

been sold at less than normal value. 

DATES: Applicable January 10, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3477 or (202) 482–1690, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 7, 2017, we published 

the Preliminary Results of the 

administrative review.1 The period of 

review (POR) for the administrative 

review is September 1, 2015, through 

August 31, 2016. We invited interested 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results and received case and rebuttal 

briefs from interested parties.2

Commerce conducted this review with 

section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

(OCTG). The merchandise subject to the 

order is currently classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) under item 

numbers: 7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20, 

7304.29.10.30, 7304.29.10.40, 

7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60, 

7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10, 

7304.29.20.20, 7304.29.20.30, 

7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50, 

7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80, 

7304.29.31.10, 7304.29.31.20, 

7304.29.31.30, 7304.29.31.40, 

7304.29.31.50, 7304.29.31.60, 

7304.29.31.80, 7304.29.41.10, 

7304.29.41.20, 7304.29.41.30, 

7304.29.41.40, 7304.29.41.50, 

7304.29.41.60, 7304.29.41.80, 

7304.29.50.15, 7304.29.50.30, 

7304.29.50.45, 7304.29.50.60, 

7304.29.50.75, 7304.29.61.15, 

7304.29.61.30, 7304.29.61.45, 

7304.29.61.60, 7304.29.61.75, 

7305.20.20.00, 7305.20.40.00, 

7305.20.60.00, 7305.20.80.00, 

7306.29.10.30, 7306.29.10.90, 

7306.29.20.00, 7306.29.31.00, 

7306.29.41.00, 7306.29.60.10, 

7306.29.60.50, 7306.29.81.10, and 

7306.29.81.50. 

The merchandise subject to the order 

may also enter under the following 

HTSUS item numbers: 7304.39.00.24, 

7304.39.00.28, 7304.39.00.32, 

7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES