alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 25 May 2005

in Case T-67/04: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SPA-FINDERS - Earlier national word marks SPA and LES THERMES DE SPA - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 182/66)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-67/04: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV, established in Spa (Belgium), represented by L. de Brouwer, E. Cornu, E. De Gryse and D. Moreau, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: A. Folliard-Monguiral), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Spa-Finders Travel Arrangements Ltd, established in New York (United States) — action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 December 2003 (Case R 131/2003-1), relating to the opposition proceedings between Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV, and Spa-Finders Travel Arrangements Ltd — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; C. Kristensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 25 May 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2202

JOHN D. HORTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

Senior District Judge. (4:07-cv-00016-H)

Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 27, 2008

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John D. Horton, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John D. Horton appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his action alleging false imprisonment. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Horton v.

United States, No. 4:07-cv-00016-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Gregory R. Hahn,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Gregory R. HahnGregory
      R. HahnPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerNovember
      11, 2009
Kenneth FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3895

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F
of Primero Mining Corp. (Primero) for the year ended December 31, 2016, and
any amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), I, Rodney Webster, M.AIG, hereby
consent to the use of my name in connection with the references to and summaries
of scientific and technical information relating to Primeros mineral properties
(collectively, the Incorporated Information) and to the inclusion of the
Incorporated Information in the Annual Information Form filed as an exhibit to
the Form 40-F and incorporated by reference therein.

Yours very truly,

/s/ Rodney Webster________________________
Rodney Webster, M.AIG

Dated: March 31, 2017

---
EX PARTE Timothy J. RICHARDS

CR-16-0111

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 14, 2016 Reh. denied December 21, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K of Encore Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gareth West, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Alex McKean, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 12, 2010
/s/ Gareth WestGareth West

Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 12, 2010
/s/ Alex McKeanAlex McKean

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name*: Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting, #1170.                

*Date/Time*: April 22, 2009: 12 p.m. to 6 p.m., April 23, 2009: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.                

*Place*: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person*: Deborah Young, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 505, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                

*Purpose of Meeting*: To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering programs and activities.                

*Agenda:*

## Wednesday, April 22

    - Introductions and Directorate Updates.
    - Broadening Participation Update and Performance.
    - Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation Update.
    - Discussion—Methods for Evaluating Success.
    - Sustainable Systems Presentation.

## Thursday, April 23

    - Industry-University Partnerships.
    - Partnerships with Agencies.
    - Discussion with Director and Deputy Director, NSF.

Dated: March 26, 2009.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-7194 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32.2




CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.




Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)




In connection with the Annual Report of CTM Media Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for fiscal 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Leslie B. Rozner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 24, 2011


/s/ Leslie B. RoznerLeslie B. RoznerChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CTM Media Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by CTM Media Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Carey DORSEY v. PROTEMP STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.

WCA 2017-793

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

January 31, 2018

Stacy Christopher Auzenne, Auzenne Law Firm, 3600 Jackson Street, # 121, Post Office Box 11817, Alexandria, Louisiana 71315-1817, (318) 880-0087, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE: ProTemp Staffing Solutions, Inc.

Charles William Farr, Attorney at Law, 1966 North Highway 190, Suite B, Covington, Louisiana 70433, (985) 626-3812, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE: Boise Cascade Company

Carey Dwayne Dorsey, Post Office Box 562, Oberlin, Louisiana 70655, (337) 977-1244, APPELLANT: IN PROPER PERSON

Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, John E. Conery, and Van H. Kyzar, Judges.

KYZAR, Judge.

Defendants-Appellees, ProTemp Staffing Solutions, Inc. (ProTemp Staffing), and Boise Cascade Company (Boise Cascade), moved to dismiss this appeal. This court issued a limited remand of this appeal in order for the Office of Workers' Compensation (OWC) court to conduct a contradictory hearing and enter a ruling as to whether the Plaintiff timely fax-filed his motion for new trial. We now enter judgment denying the motions to dismiss the appeal.

This case involves a workers' compensation action which was filed by Plaintiff-Appellant, Carey Dorsey. On April 13, 2017, the OWC judge signed the judgment appealed, and notice of this judgment was mailed on the same day.

*1196The record originally filed in this court reflected that Plaintiff filed his motion for new trial on April 26, 2017, which would have been untimely. The delay for filing a timely motion for new trial in this case ended on April 25, 2017. Thus, the Defendants filed their respective motions to dismiss the appeal as untimely filed.

Plaintiff filed a response in this court to the motions to dismiss the appeal. In Plaintiff's response, he asserted that he had fax-filed his motion for new trial in the OWC court on April 24, 2017.

Since this court is a court of record and cannot take evidence, this court entered the above-referenced limited remand. The OWC court has now conducted its hearing, taken evidence, and entered judgment finding that the Plaintiff did timely fax-file his motion for new trial on April 24, 2017, and that he also timely filed the original document with an appropriate filing fee within the time required by La.R.S. 13:850. The record in this appeal has been supplemented with the transcript of this hearing and with the exhibits filed into the record during that hearing.

Having reviewed the transcript, the trial court's ruling, and the exhibits entered into the record during this hearing, we find that the motions to dismiss filed by the Defendants must be denied. The documents support the OWC judge's decision that the Plaintiff timely fax-filed his motion for new trial on April 24, 2017, and that he timely followed up the fax-filing with the necessary filing of the original documents and an appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, we now deny the motions to dismiss the appeal.

**MOTIONS TO DISMISS APPEAL DENIED.**
Exhibit
      10.46

     

    Shenzhen
      Ping An Bank

    Loan
      Certificate (1)

     

    Date:
      September 3, 2007

    
       

        
          	
                  Applicant

                	 	
                  
                    Shenzhen
                      BAK Battery Co., Ltd

                  

                	 	
                  
                    ID
                      card of the Applicant

                  

                	 	
                  
                    73109958-5

                  

                
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  Currency

                	 	
                  RMB

                	 	
                  Amount

                	 	
                  
                    25,000,000

                  

                
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  
                    Loan
                      Term

                  

                	 	
                  
                    From
                      Sep.3, 2007 to Sep.3, 2008

                  

                
	 	 	 
	
                  Usage

                	 	
                  Working
                    Capital 

                
	 	 	 
	
                  Annual
                    rate

                	 	6.318
                  %	 	Loan
                  type	 	Short-term
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  Reference
                    Contract

                	 	
                  Shen
                    shangyin (Shuibei) Shouxinzi (2007) A110020700007

                	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  Signature
                    of Applicant

                	 	
                  Stamp
                    of Applicant

                	 	
                  
                    Signature
                      of Shenzhen Ping An Bank

                  

                	 	
                  
                    Stamp
                      of Shenzhen Ping An Bank

                  

                
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/
                    Xiangqian Li

                	 	 	 	 	 	 


        

      

    

     

    The
      above
      loan has been approved to transfer to your account.

    Lending
      Bank: (Stamp)
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer**

**Under      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                             |                                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                                                                                                                  | /s/                  Stephan V. Benediktson  |
|   | Stephan                V. BenediktsonChairman                of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive                OfficerFebruary                14,                2007 |

----
Joseph Leroy JONES-EL, Appellant/Petitioner(s) v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0966

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
    
    August 5, 2009
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ramón M. Ruiz-ComasRamón M. Ruiz-ComasPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc.
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  November 13, 2008
    By:

/s/ Anthony C. MazzulloAnthony C. MazzulloPresident and Chief Executive Officer
1096 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 9, 2018 / Notices 

Public Comments Invited: You are 

asked to comment on any aspect of this 

information collection, including (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the 

Department’s performance; (b) the 

accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) 

ways for the Department to enhance the 

quality, utility and clarity of the 

information collection; and (d) ways 

that the burden could be minimized 

without reducing the quality of the 

collected information. The agency will 

summarize and/or include your 

comments in the request for OMB’s 

clearance of this information collection. 

Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended; 

and 49 CFR 1:48. 

Kevin Mahoney, 

Director, Office of Information Technology 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2018–00164 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

United States Mint 

Notification of Citizens Coinage 

Advisory Committee January 16, 2018, 

public meeting 

ACTION: Notification of Citizens Coinage 

Advisory Committee January 16, 2018, 

public meeting 

SUMMARY: The United States Mint 

announces the Citizens Coinage 

Advisory Committee (CCAC) public 

meeting scheduled for January 16, 2018. 

Date: January 16, 2018. 

Time: 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. EST. 

Location: This meeting will occur via 

teleconference. Interested members of 

the public may dial in to listen to the 

meeting at (866) 564–9287/Access Code: 

62956028. 

Subject: Review and discussion of 

candidate designs for the 2019 America 

the Beautiful Quarters® Coin honoring 

American Memorial Park 

(Commonwealth of the Northern 

Mariana Islands), consideration of 

themes for future medals program, and 

discussion of the 2017 Annual Report. 

Interested persons should call the 

CCAC HOTLINE at (202) 354–7502 for 

the latest update on meeting time and 

room location. 

In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 5135, 

the CCAC: 

D Advises the Secretary of the 

Treasury on any theme or design 

proposals relating to circulating coinage, 

bullion coinage, Congressional Gold 

Medals, and national and other medals. 

D Advises the Secretary of the 

Treasury with regard to the events, 

persons, or places to be commemorated 

by the issuance of commemorative coins 

in each of the five calendar years 

succeeding the year in which a 

commemorative coin designation is 

made. 

D Makes recommendations with 

respect to the mintage level for any 

commemorative coin recommended. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Betty Birdsong, Acting United States 

Mint Liaison to the CCAC; 801 9th 

Street NW, Washington, DC 20220; or 

call 202–354–7200. 

Any member of the public interested 

in submitting matters for the CCAC’s 

consideration is invited to submit them 

by fax to the following number: 202– 

756–6525. 

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5135(b)(8)(C). 

David Motl, 

Acting Deputy Director, United States Mint. 

[FR Doc. 2018–00180 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES