alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 62 (Thursday, April 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15008-15009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7418]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 52-012-COL and 52-013-COL; ASLBP No. 09-883-06-COL-BD01]


South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company; Establishment of 
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 
2.318, and 2.321,

[[Page 15009]]

notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
(Board) is being established to preside over the appeal from the NRC 
Staff's determination to deny requests for access to sensitive 
unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI) in the following 
proceeding:
    South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company
    (South Texas Project Units 3 and 4)
    This appeal arises from an ``Order Imposing Procedures for Access 
to [SUNSI] and Safeguards Information for Contention Preparation'' 
dated February 13, 2009, which was included as part of a Federal 
Register notice providing an opportunity to petition for leave to 
intervene in a hearing on the application for a combined license for 
the South Texas Project Units 3 and 4 in Matagorda County, Texas. See 
74 FR 7943 (Feb. 20, 2009). By e-mail submission dated March 2, 2009, 
several individuals requested access to SUNSI material. By letter dated 
March 12, 2009, the NRC Staff denied the requests. On March 17, 2009, 
the requesters appealed the Staff's determination.
    The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:

E. Roy Hawkens, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Anthony J. Baratta, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Charles N. Kelber, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in 
August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of March 2009.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-7418 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
David JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2459

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 2, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Johnny Deione WADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2044

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Betsy Henley-Cohn and John S.
Tomac, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, of
BIW Limited (the "issuer"), do each hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q
accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.


/s/ Betsy Henley-Cohn
--------------------------
Betsy Henley-Cohn
Chairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
BIW Limited

May 15, 2006


/s/ John S. Tomac
--------------------------
John S. Tomac
President and Treasurer
(chief financial officer)
BIW Limited

May 15, 2006
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1338 CA 11-00500 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

LUCIA C. WRONSKI, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,

V ORDER

JUDITH EINACH, DEFENDANT, NICHOLAS BORON, DEBORAH M. BORON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND ROSEMARY M. MILLER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (ACTION NO. 1.)

------------------------------------------------- THOMAS S. WRONSKI, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF VICTORIA WRONSKI, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF,

V

NICHOLAS BORON, DEBORAH M. BORON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND ROSEMARY M. MILLER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (ACTION NO. 2.) (APPEAL NO. 1.)

CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER & MONTE, P.C., BUFFALO (THOMAS P. KAWALEC OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (JAMES J. DUGGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), dated November 3, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of defendant Rosemary M. Miller for summary judgment dismissing the complaints against her.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance of appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on December 13, 2011,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated October 9, 2008, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 17, 2008, (73 FR 61909), Formulation Technologies LLC., 11400 Burnet Road, Suite 4010, Austin, Texas 78758, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Fentanyl (9801), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                

The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for analytical characterization, secondary packaging, and/or for distribution to clinical trial sites.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the registration of Formulation Technologies LLC. to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Formulation Technologies LLC. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

Dated: January 9, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

 [FR Doc. E9-720 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of THL Credit, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James K. Hunt, the Chief Executive Officer
of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/    JAMES K. HUNT              
|Name:   James K. Hunt             
|Title:     Chief Executive Officer
|Date:     March 7, 2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

Order 

February 1, 2017

155227-8 (60)

DORICE M. BOYD,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155227

COA: 333414

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE Wayne CC: 15-011731-CZ

INSURANCE CO.,

Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff- Appellee,

v

ORLANDO PEAY,

Third Party Defendant-Appellant,

v

STATE TREASURER,

Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

STATE TREASURER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155228

COA: 333415

ORLANDO PEAY, Wayne CC: 15-013864-CZ

Defendant-Appellant,

and

DORICE M. BOYD and AMERICAN EQUITY

INVESTMENT LIFE INSURANCE CO.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_____________________________________/
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 1, 2017

jam

2

Clerk

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is 

DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable 

for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of 

the Court the initial partial filing fee of $75.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the 

payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this 

order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this 

Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments 

shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the 

deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $300.00. 

This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil actions 

in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and return 

plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30392 Summary Calendar

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as manager of the FSLIC Resolution Fund, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

versus GERALD C. BARTON, WILLIAM W. VAUGHAN, BERNARD ILLE, JOE W. WALSER, JR., JOSEPH V. OLREE, Defendants-Appellees, GERALD G. ROTHMAN, PETER R. KIRWIN-TAYLOR, GILBERT I NEWMAN, JACK G. GOLSEN, NORMAN L. PECK, ALBERT REICHMANN, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-3294 K

- - - - - - - - - - August 25, 1997 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) appeals the district court’s order awarding costs to defendants Barton, Vaughan, and Walser pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). The FDIC argues that the defendants are not “prevailing parties” underNo. 96-30392 -2- Rule 54 because a claim is still pending in the district court. The cross-appellants argue that the district court abused its discretion in reducing the amount of the costs award by $22,500.46. The district court’s finding that defendants Barton, Vaughan, and Walser were “prevailing parties” was not an abuse of discretion. See Fogleman v. Aramco , 920 F.2d 278, 285 (5th Cir. 1991). The district court’s determination of which costs were necessary was not an abuse of discretion. See Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp. , 5 F.3d 877, 891-92 (5th Cir. 1993), reinstated in relevant part , 61 F.3d 1113, 1118 (5th Cir. 1995) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      of Chief Financial Officer**

**Under      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                 |                                            |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                 |                                            |
| Dated:              May 15, 2008 | By:                        | /s/              Gary              J. Novinskie |
|                             | Gary              J. Novinskie       |
|                             | Chief              Financial Officer |

----
David MCRAE, Appellant, v. James BAKER, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-682

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No 333-201016 and No.333-214291) of GeoPark Limited of our report dated
March 6, 2017 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F. We also consent to the reference to us under
the heading “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” in this Form 20-F.





/s/ Price
waterhouse & CO S.R.L



|By: | /s/ Ezequiel Luis Mirazón    (Partner) | 
|--- | -------------------------------------- | 
|    | Ezequiel Luis Mirazón                  | 



Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

April 11, 2017
EXHIBIT
4.10




ADDENDUM
TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT


DATED
AS OF MAY 12, 2010 (THE “ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT”)


BETWEEN
SOURCE REWORK PROGRAM, INC. AND EAGLEFORD ENERGY INC.




This
Addendum is made and entered into as of the 12th day of
May 2010.  Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in
this Addendum shall have the meaning given to them in the Asset Purchase
Agreement.




NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants contained herein and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as
follows:




1.           Section
1.5 is added to the Agreement to read as follows:




“1.5  Title
Opinion.  Seller shall use its best efforts to provide Buyer with a
title opinion on the Assets on or before June 30, 2010. If Seller is unable to
provide a title opinion to Buyer by June 30, 2010, Buyer may, at its option,
provide written notice thereof to Seller (the “Notice”), extending the date by
which Seller may provide a title opinion for up to an additional 30 days from
the date of the Notice. The June 30, 2010 date or such later date as set forth
in the Notice shall hereafter be referred to as the Title Date. If Seller is
unable to provide a title opinion on or before the Title Date, or if it provides
such an opinion and the opinion is unable to substantiate Seller’s Defensible
Title to the Assets, Buyer may, at its opinion, rescind this Agreement by
providing written notice thereof to Seller within five (5) business days of the
Title Date (the “Notice Date”). In such event, Buyer shall promptly return the
Purchase Price to Seller which will involve the return of $25,000 in cash and
the original Note, which shall be cancelled upon receipt. Upon any such Note
cancellation, Buyer shall have no obligation to Seller thereunder. To insure
prompt return or release of the Purchase Price, Seller agrees to have the cash
payment and Note delivered in escrow with Buyer’s counsel, Gottbetter &
Partners, LLP, at Closing, and for such cash and Note to remain in escrow until
the earlier of (i) the Notice Date; (ii) such time that the title opinion
establishing Seller’s Defensible Title is received; or (iii) such time that the
title opinion condition is waived by Buyer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Buyer
and Seller may mutually agree in writing to further extend the Title
Date.”




2.           All
of the other terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement continue with full force and
effect.




3.           This
Addendum may be executed by facsimile in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together shall
constitute one and the same agreement.


1




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum has been executed by the Parties on June 10,
2010:




EAGLEFORD
      ENERGY INC.By:
                /s/ Sandra HallName:
      Sandra HallTitle:  PresidentSOURCE
      REWORK PROGRAM, INC.By:
                /s/ Eric JohnsonName:  Eric
      JohnsonTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer


2
Michael GARAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-860

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1306506
<SECURITIES>                                   4120273
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2470117
<ALLOWANCES>                                    103000
<INVENTORY>                                     551904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8525258
<PP&E>                                         6470055
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4552136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                16299085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4817671
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        765321
<OTHER-SE>                                     7709780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  16299085
<SALES>                                        5043367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5043367
<CGS>                                           791979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4530696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                103000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 577577
<INCOME-TAX>                                     20000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             557577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    557577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the December 31, 2000 10-Q Balance Sheets,
Income Statements, and Cash Flow Statements, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
 </LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     Mar-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                          Dec-31-2000
<CASH>                                    5921000
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             1120000
<ALLOWANCES>                                15000
<INVENTORY>                               4657000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         13138000
<PP&E>                                   12577000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           25715000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      581000
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    14000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                               24515000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             25715000
<SALES>                                   5193000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          5193000
<CGS>                                     4986000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             6288000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (9892000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (339000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (553000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (553000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.04)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Entest BioMedical Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Koos, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David
R. Koos


David
R. Koos


Chief Executive Officer





Date: November 11, 2009