14808 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 61 / Wednesday, April 1, 2009 / Notices 

1Estimates based on 444,000 calls annually. 

2 100 (80%) of the networked crisis centers 

currently collect this data electronically (automated 

crisis centers or ACCs). An IT worker would need 

to extract, reformat, and upload those records 

monthly. 3 25 (20%) of the networked crisis centers do not 

currently collect this data (non-automated crisis 

centers or NCCs) and counselors would therefore 

need to ask Callers questions from the Call Log. A 

30% response rate is anticipated. 444,000 total 

annual calls × (20% of the centers) = 88,800 annual 

calls answered by NCCs × (30% response rate) = 

26,640 Call Logs completed by NCCs. 

4Estimate based on crisis centers’ average staffing 

level of 30 counselors, 50% (15) of whom are 

volunteer. 25 non-automated centers × 15 volunteer 

counselors = 375 volunteer counselors. 

5Estimate assumes that incoming calls will be 

equally divided among volunteer and paid 

counselors. 26,640 calls ÷ 750 total counselors = 36 

calls per counselor. 

Prevention Lifeline Network, consisting 

of a system of toll-free telephone 

numbers that route calls from anywhere 

in the United States to a network of 

local crisis centers. In turn, the local 

centers link callers to local emergency, 

mental health, and social service 

resources. 

Through its grantee which is 

administering the National Suicide 

Prevention Lifeline Network, SAMHSA 

developed a Call Log in an effort to 

monitor basic trends in calls received. 

Data from this instrument will inform 

the Lifeline’s ability to enhance network 

services, provide training to crisis 

counselors, and more effectively target 

its promotional efforts, thus increasing 

the network’s accessibility to people at 

risk for suicidal behavior and 

optimizing public health efforts to 

prevent suicide and suicidal behavior. 

All 125 networked crisis centers will 

be invited to complete the Call Logs, 

which will be available in both Webbased and hardcopy formats. For the 

estimated 80% of centers that already 

collect compatible data, an IT worker 

will be able to conduct monthly 

downloads from their own software 

systems. For the remaining centers, 

trained crisis counselors will be able to 

complete the majority of Call Log items 

during the course of the call, without 

asking the caller specific questions. 

They will use their judgment as to 

whether to complete the remainder of 

the Call Log at the conclusion of 

individual calls. Completing the form 

entails asking callers several basic 

questions (e.g., age, race, ethnicity, 

veteran status, how they heard about the 

Lifeline service). No identifiable 

information will be collected. 

The estimated annual response 

burden 1 to collect this information is as 

follows: 

Type of respondent Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

responses 

Hours per 

response 

Total hour 

burden per 

respondent 

Total hour 

burden, all 

respondents 

IT Worker (extract, reformat, upload; 

ACCs) ............................................... 2 111,100 12 1,200 .5 6 600 

Caller (question response; NCCs) ....... 3 26,640 1 26,640 .05 .05 1,332 

Volunteer Crisis Counselor (form completion; NCCs) .................................. 4 375 5 36 13,500 .08 2 .9 1,088 

Paid Staff Crisis Counselor (form completion; NCCs) .................................. 375 36 13,500 .08 2 .9 1,088 

Total .............................................. 27,490 ........................ 54,840 .......................... .......................... 4,108 

Written comments and 

recommendations concerning the 

proposed information collection should 

be sent by May 1, 2009 to: SAMHSA 

Desk Officer, Human Resources and 

Housing Branch, Office of Management 

and Budget, New Executive Office 

Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 

20503; due to potential delays in OMB’s 

receipt and processing of mail sent 

through the U.S. Postal Service, 

respondents are encouraged to submit 

comments by fax to: 202–395–6974. 

Dated: March 25, 2009. 

Elaine Parry, 

Director, Office of Program Services. 

[FR Doc. E9–7274 Filed 3–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

Intent To Request Renewal From OMB 

of One Current Public Collection of 

Information: TSA Claims Management 

Program 

AGENCY: Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA), DHS. 

ACTION: 60 day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA) invites public 

comment on one currently approved 

Information Collection Request (ICR), 

OMB control number 1652–0039, 

abstracted below that we will submit to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for renewal in compliance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act. The ICR 

describes the nature of the information 

collection and its expected burden. The 

collection involves the submission of 

information from claimants in order to 

thoroughly examine and resolve tort 

claims against the agency. 

DATES: Send your comments by June 1, 

2009. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed 

or delivered to Ginger LeMay, PRA 

Officer, Office of Information 

Technology, TSA–11, Transportation 

Security Administration, 601 South 

12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598–6011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ginger LeMay at the above address, or 

by telephone (571) 227–3616 or e-mail 

ginger.lemay@dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The ICR documentation is 

available at http://www.reginfo.gov. 

Therefore, in preparation for OMB 

review and approval of the following 

information collection, TSA is soliciting 

comments to— 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 

the proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 61 / Wednesday, April 1, 2009 / Notices 14809 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including using 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Information Collection Requirement 

OMB Control Number 1652–0039; 

TSA Claims Management Program 

allows the agency to collect information 

from claimants in order to thoroughly 

examine and resolve tort claims against 

the agency. TSA receives approximately 

1,900 tort claims per month arising from 

airport screening activities and other 

circumstances, including motor vehicle 

accidents and employee loss. The 

Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 

1346(b), 1402(b), 2401(b), 2671–2680) is 

the authority under which the TSA 

Claims Management Branch adjudicates 

tort claims. 

The data is collected whenever an 

individual believes s/he has 

experienced property loss or damage, a 

personal injury, or other damages due to 

the negligence or wrongful act or 

omission of a TSA employee, and 

decides to file a Federal tort claim 

against TSA. Submission of a claim is 

entirely voluntary and initiated by 

individuals. The claimants (or 

respondents) to this collection are 

typically the traveling public. Currently, 

claimants file a claim by submitting to 

TSA a Standard Form 95 (SF–95), which 

has been approved under OMB control 

number 1105–0008. Because TSA 

requires further clarifying information, 

claimants are asked to complete a 

Supplemental Information page added 

to the SF–95. If TSA determines 

payment is warranted, TSA will send 

the claimant a form requesting banking 

information (routing and accounting 

numbers) in order to direct payment to 

the claimant. This form has been 

approved under OMB control number 

1652–0039. 

Claim instructions and forms are 

available through the TSA Web site at 

http://www.tsa.gov. Claimants must 

download these forms and mail or fax 

them to TSA. On the Supplemental 

Information page, claimants are asked to 

provide additional claim information 

including: (1) E–Mail address, (2) 

location of incident within the airport, 

(3) airport, (4) complete travel itinerary, 

(5) whether baggage was delayed by 

airline, (6) why they believe TSA was 

negligent, (7) whether they used a thirdparty baggage service, (8) whether they 

were traveling under military orders, 

and (9) whether they submitted claims 

with the airlines or insurance. 

If TSA determines payment is 

warranted, TSA sends the claimant a 

form requesting: (1) Claimant signature, 

(2) banking information, and (3) Social 

Security number (required by the U.S. 

Treasury for all Government payments 

to the public pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 

3325). 

Under the current system of claims 

submitted by mail or fax, TSA estimates 

there will be approximately 22,800 

respondents on an annual basis, for a 

total annual hour burden of 11,400 

hours. 

TSA will use all data collected from 

claimants to examine and analyze tort 

claims against the agency to determine 

alleged TSA liability and to reimburse 

claimants when claims are approved. In 

some cases, TSA may use the 

information to identify victims of theft 

or to aid any criminal investigations 

into property theft. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on March 26, 

2009. 

Ginger LeMay, 

Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office of 

Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. E9–7256 Filed 3–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Customs and Border Protection 

[Docket No. USCBP–2008–0112] 

Enhanced Bonding Requirement for 

Certain Shrimp Importers 

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, Department of Homeland 

Security. 

ACTION: General notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice ends the 

designation of shrimp subject to 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

orders as a special category or covered 

case subject to an enhanced bonding 

requirement (EBR). A recent World 

Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate 

Body Report held that the application of 

this requirement to shrimp from 

Thailand and India was inconsistent 

with U.S. WTO obligations. In response 

to this report, Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) is ending the 

designation of shrimp subject to 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

orders as a special category or covered 

case subject to the EBR. The shrimp 

importers affected by this requirement 

may request termination of any existing 

continuous bonds pursuant to 19 CFR 

113.27(a) and submit a new bond 

application pursuant to 19 CFR 

113.12(b). 

DATES: Effective Date: The notice is 

effective on April 1, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Genovese, AD/CVD & Revenue 

Policy & Programs Division, Trade 

Policy and Programs, Office of 

International Trade, 

David.Genovese@dhs.gov, (202) 863– 

6092. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

A key U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) mission is to collect all 

import duties determined to be due to 

the United States. Under CBP statutes 

and regulations, release of merchandise 

prior to the determination of all duties 

that may be owed is ordinarily 

permitted, provided the importer posts 

a bond or other security to insure 

payment of duties and compliance with 

other applicable laws and regulations. 

The final assessment of duties occurs at 

liquidation of the entry. 

The United States maintains a 

retrospective antidumping and 

countervailing duty system. The 

retrospective system means that in the 

case of goods subject to antidumping or 

countervailing (AD/CV) duties, the 

actual rates of AD/CV duties owed are 

calculated after the entry is made, in an 

assessment review conducted by the 

Department of Commerce (DOC). There 

is a delay between entry and final duty 

collection, and the United States 

requires that a security be provided. 

When an importer requests an 

assessment review of an AD/CV duty 

order, the amount of the duty that is 

ultimately assessed, based on the final 

AD/CV duty rate, sometimes does not 

correspond to the amount of security 

posted. 

CBP follows instructions from the 

DOC. The DOC determines the actual 

AD/CV duty rates owed on merchandise 

subject to an AD/CV duty order. CBP 

assesses the duties owed on specific 

entries upon liquidation, pursuant to 

DOC instructions as to the final rates. 

However, CBP has found that many 

importers subject to AD/CV duties fail 

to pay the additional duties determined 

to be due at liquidation. As a result, 

because defaults on AD/CV duty 

supplemental bills have increased 

significantly, CBP conducted an internal 

policy review of revenue protection 

strategies.