alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from [identify
specific financial statements(s)] and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statement(s).
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                               117
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       8665
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         136
<INVENTORY>                                                        13943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   23144
<PP&E>                                                             12807
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      4416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     40477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               6704
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                               9
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                         18812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       40477
<SALES>                                                            17913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   17913
<CGS>                                                              14435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      17565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     1114
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  680
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         680
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        .08



</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.5.2


 


 


 


	
    Additional Agreement No. 2

    to the LOAN AGREEMENT No. 3 

    dated 23 February 2021 

     

    30 November 2021

     

	Arras Minerals Corp., company established in
                                                                                                                       accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, entity No. BC1287773, located at: Suite 1610, 777 Dunsmuir
                                                                                                                       Street, Vancouver, Canada, V7Y 1K4, represented by CFO Mr. Christopher Richards, acting on basis of the Articles, hereinafter
                                                                                                                       referred to as the “Creditor”, on one part, and

                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                       Ekidos
                                            Minerals LLP, a limited liability partnership established in accordance with the laws
                                            of the Republic of Kazakhstan, BIN 191040035309, located at: Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty,
                                            050000, Almaly district, Panfilov Street 158, Office 1, represented by Confidant, Mrs. Vlada
                                            Nam, acting on the basis of the Power of Attorney, hereinafter referred to as the “Debtor”,
                                            on the other part, hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties” and
                                            individually as “Party”, have concluded this Additional Agreement No.
                                            2 to the Loan Agreement No. 3 dated 23 February 2021 (hereinafter – the “Agreement”)
                                            as follows:

                                                                                 

	
    1. Clause 3.1 of Section 3 of the Agreement to revised
    as follows:

    “The repayment of the amount of the Loan specified
    in this Agreement shall be made by the Debtor on or before 30 June 2022”.

     

	
    2. In all other matters that are not regulated by
    the terms of this Additional Agreement No. 2, the Parties are guided by the provisions of the Agreement.

     

	3. This Additional Agreement No. 2 enters into force on the
                                                                                                                         date of its signing.

                                                                                 

	
    SIGNATURES AND REQUISITES OF THE PARTIES:

     

	
    On behalf of the Creditor

    Arras Minerals Corp.

     

     

    /s/ Christopher Richards  

    Christopher Richards

    CFO

     

	
    On behalf of the Debtor

    Ekidos Minerals LLP

     

     /s/ Vlada Nam  

    Vlada Nam

    Confidant
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 27, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”) Petroleum Environmental and Research Forum (“PERF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Pall Corporation, East Hills, NY has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PERF intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 10, 1986, PERF filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 26, 2008. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 31, 2008 (73 FR 80431).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-7383 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Joshua PETTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5664

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Robert L. Burrows, Chief Financial Officer of Action Products
International, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Robert L. BurrowsRobert L. Burrows Chief Financial Officer April 22, 2004




Page 16 of 16
Ronald BOST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Matthew BUSH, Appellant, v. Bonita M. RIGGENS, Esq., Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5207

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Offer Letter, dated February 21, 2007 - Charles R. Kenmore




 Exhibit 10.10 
 ANDA NETWORKS, INC. 
 February 21, 2007 
 Charles R. Kenmore 
 ANDA Networks, Inc. 
 Dear Charles: 
 We are pleased to inform you that on February 21, 2007, the Board of Directors of ANDA
Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the following changes to your cash compensation. Effective as of April 1, 2006, your annual base salary rate will be increased from $199,750.00 to $250,000.00 and your annual bonus
opportunity will be reduced to $161,250.00 from $211,500.00, with the total annual base salary and bonus opportunity remaining at $411,250.00. 
 At the February 15, 2007 payroll date, you will be paid an additional amount of $23,031.25, which reflects the increase in base salary rate from April 1, 2006 through January 31, 2007, less the bonus amounts paid to
you for Q2 2006 through Q4 2006 that was at the higher bonus rate. Commencing with the February 15, 2007 payroll date, your base salary will be paid at the annual rate of $250,000.00 and the Ql 2007 bonus will be paid at the annual rate of
$161,250.00, provided that you meet the performance objectives set forth by the Company and as determined by the Company, in its sole discretion. You acknowledge and agree that with the payment of $23,031.25 and the base salary payment at the annual
rate of $250,000.00, the Company has paid you all amounts due and payable to you through February 15, 2007. 
 Employment with the
Company is still for no specific period of time. Your employment with the Company will be “at will,” meaning that either you or the Company may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason, with or without cause or notice. Any
contrary representations that may have been made to you are superseded by this letter agreement. This is the full and complete agreement between you and the Company on this term. The “at will” nature of your employment may only be changed
in an express written agreement signed by you and a duly authorized member of the Company’s Board of Directors (other than you). 








 Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and
returning it to the Company. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	ANDA NETWORKS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 



	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	 Board member, Compensation Committee



  

	
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
	
	 



	Charles R. Kenmore
	
	 2/21/07

	Date

  

 Page 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 23, 2012 

d0416 

Order 

 

April 23, 2012 

144542 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144542 

 COA: 308103 

Oakland CC: 2001-180525-FH 

WILLIAM SIM SPENCER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the 

Court of Appeals.
Exhibit 10.16


 


CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF


 MARKETING AGREEMENT


 


The
undersigned and Commodity Specialists Company, a Delaware corporation (“CSC”),
are parties to that certain Distiller’s Grain Marketing Agreement dated as of June 4,
2007 (the “Marketing Agreement”).


 


On
August 8, 2007, CSC and CHS Inc., a Minnesota cooperative corporation
(“CHS”), entered into an  Assignment and
Assumption Agreement (the “Assignment and Assumption Agreement”), under which
CSC assigned to CHS all of its rights, title and interest in and to the
Marketing Agreement, subject to receiving consent to such assignment from the
undersigned.


 


For
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged:


 


1.             The undersigned hereby consents and
agrees to:


 


(a)           the assignment by
CSC to CHS of all of CSC’s right, title and interest in and to the Marketing
Agreement, as described in the Assignment and Assumption Agreement;


 


(b)           the assumption by
CHS of the duties, obligations and liabilities of CSC under the Marketing
Agreement which arise on or after the date hereof, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Assignment and Assumption Agreement; and


 


(c)           deliver all notices
required to be delivered to CHS under the Marketing Agreement on or following
the date hereof, to the following address:


 


CHS
Inc.


P.O. Box
64089


St.
Paul, Minnesota 55164-0089


Attn:
Dave Christofore


Facsimile:651-355-6857


 


2.             In conjunction with this consent,
the undersigned hereby acknowledges:


 


(a)           the Marketing
Agreement is in full force and effect and has not been modified or amended,
except as stated herein; and


 


(b)           each party to the
Marketing Agreement has performed all obligations required under it as of the
date hereof and there is no default under the Marketing Agreement or facts or
circumstances which with the passing of time or giving of notice would
constitute a default thereunder.


 


 


	
  Date:

  	
  8/17/07

  	
   

  	
  Akron
  Riverview Corn Processors, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Stephen G. Roe

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  It:

  	
   

  	
  President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7384

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALONZO MATIN WILSON, JR., a/k/a June,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CR-97-117)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alonzo Matin Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo M. Wilson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that Wilson has not made a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States

v. Wilson, No. CR-97-117 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2002). Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-207-CV

MO KAEINI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS APPELLANT

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND

ASSIGNEE OF JALAL SAJADIAN, K&G

PARTNERSHIP AND KAEINI FAMILY

FIRST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

V.

FT. WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC. APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion To Dismiss Appeal And

Expedite The Issuance Of Mandate.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion

should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal and the mandate is ordered

issued this date. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c), 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 3, 2009

2
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TE NNESSEE AT KNOX VILLE Fe br ua ry 14, 200 5 S es sio n GAR Y F LAN AR Y, et al. V. CA RL GRE GOR Y D ODG E OF JOHNS ON CITY , L LC Appeal f romthe Chancer y Court for Washin gton County No. 34497 Hon. G. Richard Johnson , Chancellor

No. E2004-00620-COA- R3-CV - F ILED MAY 31, 2005

OP INION, CONCURR ING IN P ART, AND D ISS ENTING IN PART

I con cu r wi t h t he majority opinion on all issues raised except the fina l issue of
e n f o r c e ab i l i t y o f

th e c o n t r a c t , h a v i n g o n l y b e e n s i g n e d b y F l a n ar y.
I f F la na ry we re se ekin g to e nf

or c e the te rm s o f the c on tr a c t a g a ins t th e de a le rs hip wo uldthe ma

jority ho ld the c on tr a c t un e nf

or c e able ? I thi nk no t. Th e ma jority arg ue s that prior

to the filing of this action there was no c onduct on the part of the dea lership to assent to the terms of the a g re e me nt. Ob vio us ly , th e de a le rs hip wa s a wa re of the a g re e me nt a nd

too k n o actio ns to repudia te the agr eeme nt. Clearly , silence can amount to assent. The majority further arg ues that the deale rship’s ver

bal assent does not c ount be cause the expression w as not ma de until suit was filed. There was simply

no rea son to make ver bal assent until the lawsuit trig g ere d the req u ired enfor ceme nt of this contrac t.

Corpus J uris Secundum, Vol

. 1 7 , Contracts, §75, sets forth various circ umstances wh e n a c on ta c t si g ne d b y

on ly on e pa rt y is e nf or c e able , a ndpr ov ide s:
I n the abse nce of

a statute or a

rbitrary rule to the c ontrary , an ag ree ment need not be signe d to be binding, pr ovided it is either ac cepte d and ac ted on, deliver ed and acte d on, or deliver ed and a cquiesced in. So a written contr act, a lthough unsig ned by a pa rt y , is bin din g if the pa

rt y a c c e pts or pe rf

or ms un de r it or a c c e pts the be ne fi ts the re un de r. Whe re a

c on tr a c t is e nf

or c e d o n th e ba sis of

a sin g le sig na tur e , it

mus t g e ne ra lly be sig ne d b y

the pa rt y to b e c ha rg e d u nd er the c on tr a c t a ndde liv e re d to nonsigne d party who i ndicates acc eptanc e byperf orming . Moreove r, the pa rties may ag ree to be bound by

their written c ontrac t even thoug h it is not signe d by either of the m or wh e n it is s ig ne d b y

on ly on e of the m.-2-

Th e re is s imp ly

no e vid e nc e he re to c on tr a dic t th e pr e mis e that bo th p art ie s a c c e pte d th is c on tr a c t, and whe n the circ umstance a rose trig g ering the application of this contract, the de aler ship acted upon the c on tr a c t.
I

wo ulda ff

ir m th e Tria l Co urt in a ll r e sp e c ts.

______________________________ H ER SCH EL P I CKE N S F RAN KS , P

. J.
Barbara CALLADO, Pablo Lopez and Bravem Enterprises, LLC, Appellants, v. Stuart H. GITLITZ, as Court Appointed Inventory Attorney for James David Keegan, Appellee.

No. 3D17-302

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.3

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of THL Credit, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terrence W. Olson, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|/s/ TERRENCE W. OLSON                                                     
|Name: Terrence W. Olson
Title: Chief Financial Officer Date:
March 9, 2017