alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.15



AMENDMENT TO 6% SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

PRINCIPAL AMOUNT $960,000

DATED AUGUST 31, 2010



WHEREAS,onAugust 31, 2010 Eagleford Energy, Inc., an Ontario corporation (the “Obligor”), issued a 6% Secured Promissory
Note (the “Note”) due December 31, 2011 (the “Original Maturity Date”) in the principal amount
of $960,000 in favor of Benchmark Enterprises LLC, a Nevis limited liability corporation (the “Payee”); and



WHEREAS,theObligor and the Payeewish to amend the terms of the Note, to extend the Original Maturity Date by six months and to
provide for the continued accrual of interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Note during such extension at the new
rate of 10% per annum such that interest is accrued at 6% during the period from August 31, 2010 through and including December
31, 2011 and at 10% during the period from January 1, 2012 through the New Maturity Date, as such term is defined below and as
such may be accelerated under the terms of the Note.



NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the Obligor and the Payeehereby agree that: (i) the unpaid
principal balance of the Note shall be due and payable on June 30, 2012 (the “New Maturity Date”), and (ii)
interest shall continue to accrue on the unpaid principal balance of the Note at an annual rate of 10%, from January 1, 2012 until
the New Maturity Date, and shall be paid in full, together with all previously accrued interest, on the New Maturity Date. All
other terms and conditions of the Note remain unchanged.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by the Obligor and acknowledged by the Payee as of the 31st day of December, 2011.



| | EAGLEFORD ENERGY, INC.   
| | -------------------------
| |                          
| | By:                      
| | Name:                    
| | Title:                   
| |                          
| | BENCHMARK ENTERPRISES LLC
| |                          
| | By:                      
| | Name:                    
| | Title:
Etzel MENDEZ, Appellant, v. Gregory DEVACK, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1549

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Darnell M. TILLMAN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kelvin D. HARRIS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1944

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Stricken pursuant to this Court's April 19, 2013 order prohibiting further pro se appeals by this defendant as to lower case number 90-9210.
Mikhail FOUNTAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2620

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 705 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 705

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 20, 2023.
    Resolved, That William McFarland of the State of Maryland, be, and is 
hereby, chosen Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 61 (Wednesday, April 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 16, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Martin C. Bicknell, Bucyrus, Kansas; to acquire control of 
University National Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
control of University National Bank, both in Pittsburg, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 27, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-7272 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

AMBER LANE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D17-120 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 25, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Vivian T. Corvo, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Judith Ellis, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Antonio Q. CONNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1763

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Herbert FRANKLIN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2190

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), or that he entered his guilty plea involuntarily.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

WEIMER, J., recused.
exv10w21



 





Exhibit 10.21




Summary of Fiscal 2008 Named Executive Officer Compensation




Set forth is a summary of fiscal 2008 compensation arrangements between Synovis Life Technologies,
Inc. (the “Company”) and certain of its executive officers who are expected to constitute the
Company’s “named executive officers” (defined in Regulation S-K Item 402(a)(3)) for the year. All
of the Company’s executive officers are at-will employees whose compensation and employment status
may be changed at any time in the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, subject only to
the terms of the Management Change in Control Agreements between the Company and these executive
officers (the forms of which have been filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits to the
Company’s annual report on Form 10-K).



Base Salary




Effective November 1, 2007, the named executive officers are scheduled to receive the following
annual base salaries in their current positions:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Current Position	 	Base Salary
	Richard W. Kramp

(President and Chief Executive Officer)

	 	$	348,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	David A. Buché

(Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
Synovis Surgical Innovations)

	 	$	209,066	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Brett A. Reynolds 

(Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer)

	 	$	200,220	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	B. Nicholas Oray, Ph.D.

(Vice President of Research and Development)

	 	$	185,316	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Mary L. Frick 

(Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Clinical Affairs and Quality)

	 	$	183,716	 






Annual Cash Incentive Compensation




For fiscal 2008, the Company’s named executive officers are eligible to receive annual cash
incentive compensation up to 5% of their base salary based upon a subjective evaluation by the
Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the individual executive officer’s
performance and achievement of specific individual objectives during the period. For fiscal 2008,
the Compensation Committee also established an incentive cash compensation program based upon
achievement of Company financial performance goals. Additional cash incentive compensation may be
awarded at the discretion of the Compensation Committee for performance or achievement above
individual goals.



Benefits




The Company provides medical, dental and life and disability insurance benefits as well as a 401(k)
retirement plan and a stock purchase plan to its executive officers. The same benefits are
available to all Company employees.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-192799)pertaining to the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Nimble Storage, Inc. of our report dated April 17, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NimbleStorage, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2014. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California 

April 17, 2014
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2645
In Re: JOHN PAUL TURNER, Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (MISC-98-46-R) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis because he did not comply with the terms of a prefiling injunction and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See In Re: Turner , No. MISC-98-46-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 22 & Oct. 30, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of CareFusion Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the Report), Kieran T. Gallahue, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and James F. Hinrichs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Kieran T. Gallahue 
|                      |  |  |  | Kieran T. Gallahue     
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 9, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ James F. Hinrichs  
|                      |  |  |  | James F. Hinrichs      
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
STATE EX REL. Dennis L. MAGEE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-1616

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Jive Software, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony Zingale, Chief Executive Officer, Director and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                               |  |                    
|---------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|By:                                            |  | /s/ Anthony Zingale
|Anthony Zingale                               
|Chief Executive Officer, Director and Chairman
|Jive Software, Inc.                           
|March 12, 2012
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Grote Molen, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, John B. Hofman, President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    March 31, 2011 /s/ John B. Hofman John B. Hofman President, Secretary and Treasurer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Grote Molen, Inc. and will be retained by Grote Molen, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14a AND 15d-14a
OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TRM Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 60




---



##### 



(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  August 12, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Jon S. PitcherJon S. PitcherPrincipal Accounting Officer 61
A.A., the father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3079

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
AFS-13-510-E

October 21, 2013

 Exemption No. 10876

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0744

Ms. Lora Batson

Parent of Oliver Batson

55 Poplar Street, Apt. 3B

Brookly, NY 11201

Dear Ms. Batson:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received September 5, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Oliver Batson for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Oliver to 

exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, 

manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard 

a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Oliver.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Oliver Batson an exemption from § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Oliver is

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary 

to allow him to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Oliver’s parents or 

a caregiver accompanying him. Oliver Batson may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind him. In addition, Oliver’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of 

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on October 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
Frankco NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1423

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





As
      adopted pursuant to





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithtown Bancorp (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on August 8, 2008, (the “Report”), I, Anita M. Florek,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                August 8, 2008
            /s/
                Anita M.FlorekAnita
                M. Florek, Executive Vice Presidentand
                Chief Financial Officer
Royal Prince Franklin Kingsland JOHNSON, III, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2730

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Christopher Allan ELKINS v. STATE

CR-15-0351

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 28, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.