alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Ronald C. Lundy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 11, 2006 By: /s/Ronald C. Lundy         Ronald C. Lundy
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIEL E. KOWALLEK,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT 

COMPANY and CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-735

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; William L. Roby and Robert E. Belanger, Judges; L.T. Case 

No. 562014CA001633(ON).

Daniel E. Kowallek, Port St. Lucie, pro se.

Garrison M. Dundas of Hayskar, Walker, Schwerer, Et Al., Fort Pierce, 

for Appellee City of Port St. Lucie.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Ahmad Doroudian, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Neurokine
      Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2010 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Neurokine Pharmaceuticals Inc.                                                              

Dated: May 28, 2010

| | /s/
      Dr. Ahmad Doroudian                            
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | Dr. Ahmad Doroudian                                      
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial
| | Officer and Director                                     
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Accounting 
| | Officer and Principal Financial Officer)                 
| | Neurokine Pharmaceuticals Inc.                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Neurokine
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Neurokine Pharmaceuticals Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
ANDROS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Orlando BENITIZ, Jr., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0675

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F
of Primero Mining Corp. (Primero) for the year ended December 31, 2014, and
any amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), I, John Skeet, F.AusIMM, hereby
consent to the use of my name in connection with the references to and summaries
of scientific and technical information relating to Primeros mineral properties
(collectively, the Incorporated Information) and to the inclusion of the
Incorporated Information in the Annual Information Form filed as an exhibit to
the Form 40-F and incorporated by reference therein.



Yours very truly,

/s/ John SkeetJohn Skeet, F.AusIMM

Dated: March 31, 2015

---
Edmond Kennies BURKE v. STATE

CR-15-1469

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-30053 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RICHARD RANDALE JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:04-CR-50134-3

Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * R i c hard Randale Jackson, federal prisoner # 1 2 2 5 9

- 0 3 5 , a p p e a l s th e d e n i a l of his 18 U.S.C. § 3 582(c)(2) motion for sentence modification p u r s u ant to the Fair S e ntencing Act a nd A mendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Jackson challenges the d rug quantity determination t h at was made a t his original sentencing. H e a l s o c ontends that the district court found a t his original sentencing hearing that he w as r esponsible f or 1.5 kil o g r ams of crack cocaine and that this quantity results in a reduction u nder the a mended Guidelines. He U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 26, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-30053 Document: 00512288644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2013No. 13-30053

relies upon U

nited States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 2 20 (2005), and Kimbrough v. United S tates , 552 U.S. 85 (2007), and contends that resentencing is warranted in his case due to the disparity in sentencing among offenses involving cocaine and crack cocaine. Section 3 582(c)(2) permits the d iscretionary modification o f a defendant’s sentence “ in t he case of a defendant w ho ha s been sentenced t o a term of imprisonment based on a s entencing range that h as subsequently been lowered by t he Sentencing Commission.” § 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 1 B 1

. 1 0(a)(1) (2012). The district court’s d ecision whether t o reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Evans , 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009). Jackson’s reliance on Booker and Kimbrough is misplaced, as § 3582(c)(2) only applies to amendments that result i n l o w e ring a defendant’s guidelines range. See Dillon v. U nit e d States , 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2691-94 (2010); § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B). Moreover, the district court at sentencing determined that Jackson was responsible for more t han 40 kilograms o f c o c a i ne base. Accordin g l y , Jackson’s base offense level of 38 i s not m odified by Amendment 7 5 0 , because t he amendment results in a base offense level of 38 for o f f e n s e s involving “8.4 KG or more of Co c a ine Base.” § 2D1.1(c)(1) ( 2012). Jackson’s remaining arguments are s imply an attempt t o relitigate drug q uantity. Issues that relate to original sentencin g determinations m ay not be r elitigated in a § 3582(c)(2) proceeding. Evans , 587 F.3d at 674. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-30053 Document: 00512288644 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2013
Exhibit 99.8

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Auditor

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Franco-Nevada Corporation of our report dated March 22, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 

(No. 333-210295) on Form S-8 (No. 333-176856) and on Form F-10 (No. 333-210878) of Franco-Nevada Corporation of our report dated March 22, 2017 referred to above. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts”, which appears in the Annual Information Form which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F, which is incorporated by reference in such Registration Statements.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

 

Toronto, Ontario

March 22, 2017

 

----
Exhibit 10.5


 


> In accordance with
Paragraph 3.5 of that certain Asset Purchase Agreement “(APA”) entered into on December     ,
2007, the undersigned agree that he (she) will not publicly or privately sell,
assign, transfer, convey pledge or hypothicate any shares of the common stock
of Hanover Gold Company, Inc for a period of three months from the closing date
of the APA. Thereafter such sales shall be limited to 5 percent, 10 percent and
20 percent respectively of the undersigned’s holdings for each of the following
three month periods, respectively. Following such periods, there shall be no
further restrictions on such sales. 


	
  > 

  
	
  > Dated

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  > 

  
	
  > 

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  > Print name

  
	
  > 

  
	
  > 

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  > Signature

  
	
  > 

  
	
  > 

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  > Number of shares
  owned

  
	
  > 

  
	
  >
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting DocumentationDateStaffContactInformation(Name, email,phone #)Name of Organization(Attach list of allattendees names andemails if possible)Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability,reporting requirements, etc.)WrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit to Docket?Date sent toEPA- CCD7/29/10EmailCorrespondenceToby Mandel,ICF International,tmandel@icfi.com202-862-1566on behalf of EPAunder ContractEP-W-07-068,Task Order 68Robert RussellRJR Consultingrjrussell1280@msn.com(614) 322-9450Question:Approximately what percentage of closed-cell foamimporters are also the manufacturers of that foam?Response:•As we have described to EPA before there is notgoing to be much closed cell foam imported.Most if not all products are available in the U.S.•Expensive to pay freight on high-cube, lowweight products like foam•What small amount is being imported is likelybeing done by manufacturers to handle specificproduct outages or to augment a product linewith a product that is specifically not made inthe US. Another reason would be to "testmarket" whether a certain product would besuccessful in the U.S. market beforecommitments to add thatSKU on a U.S. plant.My estimate would be that 80% would bebrought in by manufacturers and 20% bydistributors or OEMs. Insulated closed-cellfoams used in refrigerators would be the oneexception to this split. Not sure of finishedrefrigerators are within the scope of yourquestion, but there it is all being imported bythe appliance manufacturers in fully finishedunits.Question:If the importers are not manufacturers, how readilyN/AN/Acan they obtain data on the type and amount ofblowing agent used for that foam?Response:•The importer would need to know who themanufacturer is. Sometimes the BA type can begleened from the MSDS (Material safety DataSheet). Some manufacturers would not disclosethis to a customer calling-in. So it is possible toget, but would likely require various amounts ofeffort based on: What the product is? Who'sasking? The amount of business done betweenthem and the relationship. If it becomes an EPArequirement, the purchaser can always make it aneeded piece of information for being able tobuy product in the U.S.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

SEC RELEASE NO. 33-8124

I, A. Leon Blaser, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Environmental Energy Services, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Dated: May 14, 2004 | /s/ A. Leon Blaser                                  
|------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                    | A. Leon Blaser, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, David G. Mazzella, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: November 13, 2007 By: /s/ David G. Mazzella           David G. Mazzella    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
23
Victor BOCCHECIAMP-OLIVO, Appellant, v. SEMINOLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS and Florida School Board Insurance Trust, Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D17-0309

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

|EXHIBIT 99.7                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION                                
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Blaiklock, Chief Financial Officer of Primero Mining
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/
      David Blaiklock
| | ------ | -------------------------
| | Name:  | David Blaiklock          
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer  
| |        |                          
| | Date:  | March 31, 2014           

---
EGU MACT: Costs Higgins, Cortney to: RobertJ Wayland 03/08/2011 04:57 PM Cc: Bill Maxwell

Hi Bob,

The IPM cost information breakdown provided on Friday did not include the monitoring costs – can you provide those by pollutant?

Also, can we have a breakdown of the revised number of control devices that are expected to be installed?

Finally, any sense of when the IPM run data will be sent to us?

Thanks, Cortney