Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 61 / Wednesday, April 1, 2009 / Notices 14771 

1Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 

on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day 

when the Department is closed. 

2 If the review request involves a non-market 

economy country and the parties subject to the 

review request do not qualify for separate rates, all 

other exporters of subject merchandise from the 

non-market economy country who do not have a 

separate rate will be covered by the review as part 

of the single entity of which the named firms are 

a part. 

the review will continue. Thereafter, 

any interested party wishing to 

participate in the Sunset Review must 

provide substantive comments in 

response to the notice of initiation no 

later than 30 days after the date of 

initiation. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: March 19, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–7294 Filed 3–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4697. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspension of 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may 

request, in accordance with section 

351.213 (2007) of the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) regulations, 

that the Department conduct an 

administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative review 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, the 

Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. 

imports during the period of review. We 

intend to release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

to all parties having an APO within five 

days of publication of the initiation 

notice and made our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 20 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Therefore, we 

encourage all parties interested in 

commenting on respondent selection to 

submit their APO applications on the 

date of publication of the initiation 

notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. 

The Department invites comments 

regarding the CBP data and respondent 

selection within 10 calendar days of 

publication of the Federal Register 

initiation notice. 

Opportunity to Request a Review: 

Not later than the last day of April 

20091, interested parties may request 

administrative review of the following 

orders, findings, or suspended 

investigations, with anniversary dates in 

April for the following periods: 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings Period 

FRANCE: Sorbitol.

A–427–001 ............................................................................................................................................. 4/1/08 - 3/31/09 

NORWAY: Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon.

A–403–801 ............................................................................................................................................. 4/1/08 - 3/31/09 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Activated Carbon.

A–570–904 ............................................................................................................................................. 4/1/08 - 3/31/09 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Magnesium Metal.

A–570–896 ............................................................................................................................................. 4/1/08 - 3/31/09 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Non–Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings.

A–570–875 ............................................................................................................................................. 4/1/08 - 3/31/09 

RUSSIA: Magnesium Metal.

A–821–819 ............................................................................................................................................. 4/1/08 - 3/31/09 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings.

NORWAY: Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon.

C–403–802 ............................................................................................................................................ 1/1/08 - 12/31/08 

Suspension Agreements.

None..

In accordance with section 351.213(b) 

of the regulations, an interested party as 

defined by section 771(9) of the Act may 

request in writing that the Secretary 

conduct an administrative review. For 

both antidumping and countervailing 

duty reviews, the interested party must 

specify the individual producers or 

exporters covered by an antidumping 

finding or an antidumping or 

countervailing duty order or suspension 

agreement for which it is requesting a 

review, and the requesting party must 

state why it desires the Secretary to 

review those particular producers or 

exporters.2 If the interested party 

intends for the Secretary to review sales 

of merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which were produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order–by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Please note that, for any party the 

Department was unable to locate in 

prior segments, the Department will not 

accept a request for an administrative 

review of that party absent new 

information as to the party’s location. 

Moreover, if the interested party who 

files a request for review is unable to 

locate the producer or exporter for 

14772 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 61 / Wednesday, April 1, 2009 / Notices 

1See Notice of Amendment of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Preserved 

Mushrooms From the People’s Republic of China, 

64 FR 8308 (February 19, 1999). 

2Based on the name by which Zhangzhou 

Gangchang identified itself in its request for new 

shipper review, the Department initiated the review 

for this company under the name Zhangzhou 

Gangchang Canned Foods Co., Ltd. See Certain 

Preserved Mushrooms from the People’s Republic of 

China: Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Reviews, 73 FR 57333 (October 2, 

2008). However, Zhangzhou Gangchang 

subsequently stated that its name is actually 

Zhangzhou Gangchang Canned Foods Co., Ltd., 

Fujian. See Zhangzhou Gangchang’s January 16, 

2009, submission at 8. Record evidence supports 

Zhangzhou Gangchang’s contention. See 

Zhangzhou Gangchang’s November 6, 2008, 

submission at Exhibit A-4. Therefore in this and 

subsequent notices we refer to Zhangzhou 

Gangchang by its correct name. 

which it requested the review, the 

interested party must provide an 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to section 

351.303(f)(3)(ii) of the regulations. 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department 

has clarified its practice with respect to 

the collection of final antidumping 

duties on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders. See also the Import 

Administration web site at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov. 

Six copies of the request should be 

submitted to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street & 

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 

DC 20230. The Department also asks 

parties to serve a copy of their requests 

to the Office of Antidumping/ 

Countervailing Operations, Attention: 

Sheila Forbes, in room 3065 of the main 

Commerce Building. Further, in 

accordance with section 351.303(f)(l)(i) 

of the regulations, a copy of each 

request must be served on every party 

on the Department’s service list. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of April 2009. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of April 2009, a request for review 

of entries covered by an order, finding, 

or suspended investigation listed in this 

notice and for the period identified 

above, the Department will instruct the 

CBP to assess antidumping or 

countervailing duties on those entries at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or 

bond for) estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: March 19, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–7292 Filed 3–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–851] 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is currently 

conducting new shipper reviews (NSRs) 

of the antidumping duty order on 

certain preserved mushrooms from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC)1

covering the period of review February 

1, 2008, through July 31, 2008. We 

preliminarily determine that the sales 

made by Zhangzhou Gangchang Canned 

Foods Co., Ltd., Fujian (Zhangzhou 

Gangchang)2 and by Zhejiang Iceman 

Group Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Iceman), were 

not made below normal value (NV). If 

these preliminary results are adopted in 

our final results of this review, we will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping 

duties on entries of subject merchandise 

during the period of review (POR) for 

any importer–specific assessment rates 

that are above de minimis. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2924 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 21, 2008, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Tariff Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.214(c), the Department 

received a NSR request from Zhejiang 

Iceman. On August 22, 2008, we 

received a NSR request from Zhangzhou 

Gangchang, also pursuant to 

751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act the 19 

CFR 351.214(c). The Department 

determined that both of these requests 

had not been properly filed, and 

therefore returned them on August 26, 

2008. On August 29, 2008, both 

companies resubmitted their requests. 

They both certified that they are the 

producers and exporters of the subject 

merchandise upon which the requests 

were based. 

On October 2, 2008, the Department 

initiated antidumping duty NSRs on 

certain preserved mushrooms from the 

PRC covering the two companies. See 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Reviews, 73 FR 57333 (October 

2, 2008) (Initiation Notice). 

On October 8, 2008, the Department 

issued its standard antidumping 

questionnaire to both Zhejiang Iceman 

and Zhangzhou Gangchang. Between 

November 2008 and February 2009, 

Zhejiang Iceman and Zhangzhou 

Gangchang submitted responses to the 

original sections A, C, and D 

questionnaires and supplemental 

sections A, C, and D questionnaires. 

On November 3, 2008, the Department 

sent interested parties a letter requesting 

comments on surrogate country 

selection and information pertaining to 

valuing factors of production (FOP). On 

February 17, 2009, Zhejiang Iceman and 

Zhangzhou Gangchang submitted 

surrogate value data. No other party 

submitted surrogate country or surrogate 

value data. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are certain preserved mushrooms, 

whether imported whole, sliced, diced, 

or as stems and pieces. The certain 

preserved mushrooms covered under 

this order are the species Agaricus 

bisporus and Agaricus bitorquis. 

‘‘Certain Preserved Mushrooms’’ refers 

to mushrooms that have been prepared 

or preserved by cleaning, blanching, and 

sometimes slicing or cutting. These