alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.5






SALE AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT




This Sale Agreement Assignment (“Assignment”) is made as of December 21, 2007 by and between Triple
Net Properties, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (“Assignor”), and G&E Apartment REIT The
Myrtles at Old Towne, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), and is made with
respect to the Sale Agreement by and between Assignor and The Myrtles at Olde Towne, L.L.C., a
Delaware limited liability company (“Seller”) dated December 10, 2007 (“PSA”). For good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereby agree as follows:



Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the PSA,
the escrow created pursuant to the PSA, any Deposits (as defined in the PSA) in such escrow or held
by Seller, and all other rights and assets appurtenant to any of the foregoing (“Assets”).



Assignee hereby accepts the Assets and assumes all of Assignor’s obligations under the PSA, whether
arising before or after the date of this Assignment. Assignor acknowledges that it is not released
from any PSA obligations, whether arising before or after the date of this Assignment, as a result
of such assignment.



Upon deliver hereto to Seller, Buyer’s address per PSA Section 12 is hereby unchanged.



In witness whereof, the undersigned have executed this Assignment as of the above date.




	 	 	 	Assignor: Triple Net Properties, L.L.C. a Virginia limited liability company






By:/s/ Francene LaPoint

Title: CFO





	 	 	 	Assignee: G&E Apartment REIT The Myrtles at Olde Towne, LLC, a Delaware limited
	 
	 	 	 	liability company






By: /s/ Shannon K S Johnson



Shannon K S Johnson,

Authorized Signatory
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 6, 2018.

                    A.                     *Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *Emmetsburg Bank Shares Inc., Emmetsburg, Iowa;*                     to acquire 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Panora State Bank, Panora, Iowa.                

      ( print page 1363)    
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 8, 2018.

Ann E. Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-00341 Filed 1-10-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Amendment No. 1 to Subcontracted Services Agreement




 Exhibit 10.33 
 

 
 Amendment Number 1 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE 
 SUBCONTRACTED SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN 
 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES WORLD SERVICES INC. 
 AND 
 ANDA NETWORKS, INC. 
 This Amendment is made by and between Lucent Technologies World Services Inc., (“Lucent”), a Delaware corporation with offices at 500 Mountain Avenue Murray
Hill, NJ 07084, and ANDA Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation with offices at 1274 Geneva Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 (“Customer”), and shall become effective on the data last executed below by authorized representatives of both Lucent
and Customer. 
 WHEREAS the Subcontracted Services Agreement Number ENT06000090A1 which became effective March 16, 2006 (“Agreement”),
between Lucent and Customer requires an amendment to the Agreement addressing rights in jointly developed inventions and works as set forth in Section 8.A., INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; and, 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to revise the Agreement as follows: 
 1.
Replace the last sentence in Section 8.A., INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, referencing rights in jointly developed inventions and works with the following: 
 “Any intellectual property created jointly by the parties in the course of performance under this Agreement shall be jointly owned by the parties. Subject to the other party’s rights under its pre-existing
and separate intellectual property, each party shall be free to use, exploit and grant non-exclusive licenses under any such jointly created intellectual property without permission of or duty to account to the other. In the event of a joint
invention, each party will cooperate with the other in obtaining protection under US patent laws. A “joint inventions” shall mean an invention made jointly by one or more Lucent employees and one or more Customer employees first conceived
or first actually reduced to practice in the course of performance under this Agreement.” 
 2. All other terms and conditions set forth in the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their authorized representatives, have executed and made
effective this Amendment. 
  

									
	ANDA NETWORKS, INC.	 		 	LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES WORLD SERVICES INC.
					
	By:	 	 


	 		 	By:	 	 



	Name:	 	Lewis Nichols	 		 	Name:	 	ERIC W. NEGLEY
	Title:	 	VP Operations	 		 	Title:	 	CONTRACT MANAGER
	Date:	 	5-19-06	 		 	Date:	 	07 June 2006

  


					
		  	LUCENT PROPRIETARY	  	1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 937 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 937

           Raising awareness for the sarcoma cancer chordoma.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2023

 Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Williams of 
Georgia, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Schiff, and Mr. Davis of 
North Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Raising awareness for the sarcoma cancer chordoma.

Whereas chordoma is a slow growing, yet aggressive bone cancer of the skull and 
        spine;
Whereas it strikes people of all ages and affects more than 25,000 individuals 
        worldwide;
Whereas each year, thousands of people are diagnosed with chordoma including 
        about 300 people annually in the United States;
Whereas chordomas are among the most complicated tumors to treat due to 
        involvement of critical structures such as the brain stem, spinal cord, 
        and important nerves and arteries;
Whereas surgery or radiation performed by a skilled treatment team can be 
        curative for some patients, but even with the best care possible, the 
        recurrence rate remains high; and
Whereas no drugs are known to cure or effectively control the disease, meaning 
        that patients whose disease progresses after exhausting surgical and 
        radiation options have little hope for a full recovery: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
chordoma patients and families need increased funding and support for--
            (1) accurate and early diagnosis;
            (2) the development of new treatments, diagnostics, and 
        cures;
            (3) fewer hurdles between research and new treatments; and
            (4) patient-centric approaches to drug discovery and 
        development.
                                 <all>
```
Priscilla Marie GALINDO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joel GALINDO, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Harvey Daniel VAUGHAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-610

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 35.1
 Servicer Compliance Statement
     /s/ john f. remondiJohn F. RemondiVice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Sallie Mae, Inc.




---



##### 



Appendix A
 Trust Name:
    
    Date of Issuance:SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-1
    
    January 26, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-2
    
    February 23, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-3
    
    March 9, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-4
    
    April 20, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-5
    
    June 21, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-6
    
    July 20, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-7
    
    August 10, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-8
    
    September 14, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-9
    
    October 12, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-10
    
    November 30, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-A
    
    April 6, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-B
    
    June 8, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-C
    
    September 28, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-1
    
    January 25, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-2
    
    February 22, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-3
    
    March 15, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-4
    
    April 5, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-5
    
    July 19, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-6
    
    October 23, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-7
    
    November 8, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-8
    
    December 6, 2007SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2007-A
    
    March 29, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-1
    
    January 17, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-2
    
    February 7, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-3
    
    February 28, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-4
    
    April 17, 2008Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-3
    
    April 24, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-5
    
    April 30, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-6
    
    June 12, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-7
    
    July 2, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-8
    
    August 5, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-9
    
    August 28, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2009-1
    
    April 9, 2009SLM Student Loan Trust 2009-2
    
    April 21, 2009
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of
Primero Mining Corp. (Primero) for the year ended December 31, 2015, and any
amendments thereto (the Form 40-F), I, Gabriel Voicu, P.Geo., hereby consent
to the use of my name in connection with the references to and summaries of
scientific and technical information relating to Primeros mineral properties
(collectively, the Incorporated Information) and to the inclusion of the
Incorporated Information in the Annual Information Form filed as an exhibit to
the Form 40-F and incorporated by reference therein.



Yours very truly,

/s/ Gabriel Voicu______________________ Gabriel
Voicu, P.Geo.

Dated: March 31, 2017

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, NINDS Conference Grant Review Panel.                    

*Date:*                         April 9, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, 3201, Rockville, MD 20852. (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alan L. Willard, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20852-9529. (301) 496-5390.                         *willarda@ninds.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 14807)    
Dated: March 26, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-7309 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Cleveland WEAVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5341

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 27, 2017.

Cleveland Weaver, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This Court issued an order on October 10, 2017, directing Appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against him in light of his having instituted repetitive, meritless proceedings in this Court. *See**State v. Spencer*, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

We have reviewed Appellant's response and determined that it does not provide a legal basis to justify withholding imposition of sanctions.

Appellant is hereby prohibited from filing any pro se filings in this Court challenging his convictions and sentences imposed in Gadsden County case number 88-CF-564. The clerk of this court is directed to not accept any filing in this case unless it is signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar. Appellant is warned that any filings that violate the terms of *356this order may result in a referral to the appropriate correctional institution for disciplinary proceedings.

AFFIRMED.

RAY and OSTERHAUS, JJ., and PATTERSON, CHRISTOPHER N., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,808,176
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          29,948
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 41,125,061
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      16,194,721
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        57,035,617
<LOANS>                                     96,921,344
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,679,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             177,758,895
<DEPOSITS>                                 157,632,460
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          6,737,056
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,239,775
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,010,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             177,758,895
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,043,785
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,314,373
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   332
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,358,490
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,666,565
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,741,577
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,616,913
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  370,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,307,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,578,587
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,010,143
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,010,143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.27
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,431,833
<LOANS-PAST>                                    25,690
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,525,294
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  137,338
<RECOVERIES>                                    17,211
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,679,767
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,679,767
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        692,237
        

</TABLE>
Glenn A. WHIGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4041

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CALVIN JOPPY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1546

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 8, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

Calvin Joppy, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Artoris N. WATERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2631

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>        Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>          Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                        167
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                 709
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                  1469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             2534
<PP&E>                       2191
<DEPRECIATION>              (1122)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               4080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         363
<BONDS>                       600
<COMMON>                        1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                   3116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 4080
<SALES>                      4633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             4633
<CGS>                        3027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                3027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             1295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>          41824
<INCOME-PRETAX>            295021
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>        295021
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>               295021
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .20
        

</TABLE>
Michael B. GILMORE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 9, 2018

Michael B. Gilmore, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In  connection  with  the Quarterly report of Broadleaf Capital Partners,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2004,
as filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Melissa  R.  Blue,  acting in the capacity as the Interim Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Melissa R. Welch
----------------------------
     Melissa R. Welch
     Chief Financial Officer
     December 15, 2004