alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Essense Water, Inc.
(the
"Company") for the year ended August 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin Nichols, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date: December 13, 2013                By: /s/ Kevin Nichols
                                           -----------------
                                              Kevin Nichols
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
31.1





CELSION
CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION








I,
Michael H. Tardugno, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the quarterly report of
Celsion


Corporation; and





2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.








Date:
November 18,
2009                                                                  /s/ Michael H.
Tardugno


Michael H.
Tardugno


Chief Executive
Officer


Celsion
Corporation
1

MEMORANDUM

From: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions for New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Date: August 3, 2015

Subject: Incorporation by Reference of Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603 – Standards of 

Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Modified and Reconstructed Sources: 

Electric Utility Generating Units

This docket contains information that is relevant to Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 entitled, 

“Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions for New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility

Generating Units.” Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603 is incorporated by reference into Docket 

No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495.
Milton Jerome BATTLES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 3, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 410 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-105, 
CP2018-147.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-28367 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX PARTE Justin Deron COLEMAN

CR-15-1414

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 7, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
James OLIVER, DOC #226260, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       274
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                               6757
<ALLOWANCES>                                 123
<INVENTORY>                                15324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           22756
<PP&E>                                     11800
<DEPRECIATION>                              4029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             33671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      10574
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       8
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                 16106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               33671
<SALES>                                    14139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           14139
<CGS>                                      10926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              13285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              684
<INCOME-TAX>                                 270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          414
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .05
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1   Certification of CEO
      and CFOPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant
      toSection 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofORGANA GARDENS INTERNATIONAL INC.for the
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Christopher Scheive, as the
equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Company,  hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:  (1)   The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  /s/Christopher ScheiveName: Christopher ScheiveDate: November 16,
2009  This
certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350  Certification of Chief
Executive Officer



In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31,
2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl O’Connell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Carl O’Connell      | 
|----------------------- | 
|Carl O’Connell          | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|April 2, 2018           |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gift Card Digest Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Tammi Shnider, President, Director, Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Tammi Shnider
---------------------
Tammi Shnider, President, Director,
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

April 7, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6842]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices, Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E9-6407 published on page 
12362 of the issue for Tuesday, March 24, 2009.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City heading, the entry 
for David Rossiter, Hartington, Nebraska, is revised to read as 
follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offerbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Donald Rossiter, Hartington, Nebraska, individually and as 
trustee of the Mary E. Rossiter Trust; and Carol F. Rossiter, Macon, 
Georgia, individually and as trustee of the Mary E. Rossiter Trust, and 
the Margaret R. Rossiter Trust; Donald W. Rossiter; Carol F. Rossiter; 
Phyllis Schrempp; J. Scott Schrempp; Christine Rossiter; and Leon 
Schrempp, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Cedar 
Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Bank of 
Hartington, both in Hartington, Nebraska.
    Comments on this application must be received by April 6, 2009.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 24, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-6842 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Synthetech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Form 10-Q), I, M. Sreenivasan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ M. SreenivasanM. Sreenivasan
 President & C.E.O. February 14, 2005
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Larry SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0876

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
From: Joyce M Eden <comment@sonic.net>

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/22/2009 01:23 PM

Subject: Re: when & where testimony transcript will be posted

Hi Keith: Thanks for the info re the transcripts. I did not mention 

old mercury mines nearby. However, there are old mercury mines on the 

other side of San Francisco Bay from us, which further gives us 

concerns about the amount of mercury in the limestone at the Lehigh 

Plant. However, we do not in any want the amount of mercury in the 

limestone to be used to allow more mercury to be emitted based on 

that. We want the EPA to stand with the requirement in the proposed 

rule to not allow any more than 43 lbs of mercury to be emitted from 

any cement kiln. Otherwise, this rule, regarding the mercury reduction 

component, would be rendered meaningless, not only for the local 

communities, but also for the accumulating amounts of mercury in the 

environment.

Thanks, Joyce

On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov wrote:

> I will email you the transcripts, probably in the next few days.

>

> Also, a question - someone mentioned to me that there was a cement

> facility that had several old mercury mines nearby - was that you?

>

> Keith W. Barnett

> USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

> Mail Code D243-02

> Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

> 919-541-5605

> barnett.keith@epa.gov

>

>

>

> From: Joyce M Eden <comment@sonic.net>

>

> To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

>

> Date: 07/17/2009 04:44 PM

>

> Subject: when & where testimony transcript will be posted

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Hi Keith: I have not been able to find out when and where the

> transcript for the testimony regarding the following docket # will be

> posted on the web.

>

> Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051. 1200
>

> Nothing is yet posted at

>

> 

http://www.regulations.gov/search/search_results.jsp?sid=1228A6504D23&Ntt=EPA

-HQ-OAR-2002-0051%2c

> +1200&Ntk=All&Ntx=mode 

> +matchall&N=4294967141+8102+8099+8056&css=0&Ne=2+8

> +11+8053+8054+8098+8074+8066+8084+8055+11

>

> Is this the correct web address at which to find the transcript of the

> testimony given in the various cities? At this moment, I am especially

> interested in the testimony I gave on behalf of WVCAW as I would like

> to link to it, as I varied slightly from my prepared statement and,

> since there was time, I testified a second time with an unprepared

> statement.

>

> Thanks, Joyce M Eden, West Valley Citizens Air Watch

>

>

>
Willie ROGERS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1572

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 780 

Expressing support for the goals of ‘‘World Sight Day’’ by promoting the 

importance of accessible, affordable, and inclusive eye care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2023 

Mr. VEASEY (for himself, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. PAYNE, and Ms. SEWELL) 

submitted the following resolution 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of ‘‘World Sight Day’’ 

by promoting the importance of accessible, affordable, 

and inclusive eye care. 

Whereas people with vision problems are more likely than 

those with good vision to have diabetes, poor hearing, 

heart problems, high blood pressure, lower back pain, and 

strokes, as well as have increased risk for falls, injury, 

and depression; 

Whereas the majority of people with vision impairment and 

blindness are over the age of 50 years; 

Whereas the Lancet Global Health Commission estimates 

that the economic cost of blindness and moderate to severe vision loss was $411,000,000,000 in 2020 (equivaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:16 Nov 03, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR780.IH HR780

dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 780 IH 

lent to 0.3 percent of the world’s GDP in 2018), costing 

the most in east Asia ($90,000,000,000) and south Asia 

($70,000,000,000); 

Whereas the overall relative reduction in employment of people with sight loss of working age is 30 percent; 

Whereas correcting vision improves educational outcomes, increases personal earnings by 5 percent, increases productivity of the working poor by more than 20 percent, improves literacy rates, decreases rates of early retirement, 

and results in safer drivers and roads; 

Whereas a slight vision impairment can reduce productivity 

in the workplace by 20 percent and accuracy by 40 percent; 

Whereas 50 percent of blindness and low vision in children 

can be easily prevented or treated, most often with nothing more than a pair of glasses; 

Whereas globally, at least 450,000,000 children have a sight 

condition that needs treatment, with 90,000,000 children 

living with some form of sight loss; 

Whereas children with vision loss are 2 to 5 times less likely 

to be in formal education in low- and middle-income 

countries; 

Whereas glasses are one of the most effective health interventions for children, reducing the odds of failing a class by 

44 percent; and 

Whereas October 12 is recognized as ‘‘World Sight Day’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘World 

3 Sight Day’’; 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 780 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the importance of healthy vision; 

2 (3) encourages the people of the world to 

3 prioritize eye health; and 

4 (4) draws attention to the over 1,000,000,000 

5 people worldwide who have vision loss and do not 

6 have access to eye care services. 

Æ 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
#### W. Fred Kisner *v.*Commercial Credit Company

(No. 7798)

Submitted April 10, 1934.

Decided April 17, 1934.

*Deveney & JPwrbee*and *Harrison Conaway,*for plaintiff in error.

Lite, Judge:

This is an action for conversion of personal property. Defendant, Commercial Credit Company, complains of a judgment against it, on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff, W. Fred Eisner, for $300.00.

August 12, 1931, Cather Robinson Motor Company of Fairmont, West Virginia, delivered an automobile to Eisner under a conditional sales contract. He agreed to pay the deferred purchase price of $704.00, evidenced by note, in sixteen equal monthly installments. The contract provided that upon his default in the payment of any installment, the remaining purchase price would become due and payable, and *812tbe bolder of tbe note would be entitled to re-take tbe property without legal process or notice and retain or sell it in accordance with tbe conditional sales act. Immediately upon tbe sale by tbe motor company to plaintiff, it assigned tbe contract to tbe Commercial Credit Company. Tbe plaintiff baying failed to pay the installments regularly, tbe credit company, on May 20, 1932, because of default in tbe payment of tbe installment due May 12th, instituted an action of deti-nue before a justice of tbe peace to recover tbe car. It was immediately taken into possession by tbe officer serving tbe process and delivered to tbe company. Judgment was rendered by tbe justice in favor of tbe credit company and Eisner appealed. Tbe jury having found, upon trial of the appeal, that tbe company was entitled to tbe possession of tbe automobile and that its value was $450.00, tbe circuit court dismissed tbe action on tbe ground that tbe amount in controversy exceeded tbe jurisdiction of tbe justice. Meanwhile, tbe company had sold tbe car, in accordance with Code 1931, 40-3-19. This action was then brought upon tbe theory that tbe company was liable for conversion as a sequence to tbe dismissal of tbe detinue action. There is no appearance, in this court, on behalf of plaintiff.

As the company was entitled to the property without legal process, it certainly incurred no liability in obtaining possession by abortive process. “If one has the right to take possession of personal property without legal process, it is difficult to imagine upon what theory be could be deprived of that right, if be attempted to exercise it, by legal process which subsequently turned out to be void. In either case plaintiff’s position would be precisely the same.” *Mendelson*v. Irving, 155 App. Div. 114, 139 N. Y. S. 1065. “An action for taking and detaining personal property can only be maintained where plaintiff was the owner or entitled to the possession of the property at the time of the taking.” *Wilson*v. *Live Stock Co.,*153 U. S. 39, 38 L. Ed. 627.

Tbe judgment is reversed, tbe verdict set aside and a new trial awarded.

*Judgment reversed; verdict set aside; new trial aioarded.*
Michael J. NUZZO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1313

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 18, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Juan J. Román, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Triple-S ManagementCorporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period endedMarch 31, 2008(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 and; 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.        Date:  May 9, 2008  By: /s/ Juan J. Román        Juan J. Román       *Vice President of Finance*       *and Chief Financial Officer*  A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
Timmie Lee DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2899

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.