alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FIANANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND III MARCH 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         101,767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,137
<PP&E>                                      10,464,554
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,534,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,315,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          436,531
<BONDS>                                      3,410,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     356,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,315,837
<SALES>                                        141,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,806
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               152,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             147,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (139,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (139,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (139,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.83)
        

</TABLE>
Carlos D. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2257

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      12, 2010 | /s/ Michael J. Dolan         |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                    | Michael      J. Dolan        |
|                                    | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
### DEPARTMEN TO F :RANSPORTAT!O N U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N - 'i^JKI^ f QPFRATIOM

S OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . 1^}\ 1 AP H ! b A iQ

: 2 U

I N THE MATTEROF : RIANC . SEEMAN . Respondent . FA A Docke t No . FAA-2012-019 8 Judg e J.E . Sulliva n FA A CAS E NO . 2011SO37010 3 MOTIO N FO RCONTINUANC E Th e Complainant , b y an dthroug h th e undersigne dattorney , pursuan t to Sectio n 13.21 8 o f th e Rule s o f

Practic e i

n FA A Civi l Penalt

y Action s th e Complainan t request s tha

t th e Amdministrativ e La

w Judg e continu e th e Rul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conferenc e se t fo r Jun e 5 , 2012 . I

n support o f thi s Motion , Complainan t state s th e following : I . O n Apri l 9 , 2012 , th e Administrativ e La w Judg e issue dth e Orde r Settin g Rul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conference , an dDirectin g Rul e 26( 0 Plannin g andSubmissio n i n th e abov e matter . Th e Orde r

state s tha

t th e Rul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conferenc e i s schedule dfo r Tuesday , Jun e 5 , 201 2 a

t 11:00a mEastern Time . 2 . Prio r t o th e Complainant' s receip t o f th e above-reference dOrde r i n thi s matter , th e undersigne dattorne y schedule dapre-paid^fo r avacatio n th e week

o f Jun e 4-8 , 2012 . A s aresult , th e Agency' s attorne y i s unavailabl e fo r th e Litigatio n Schedulin g Conferenc e o n Jun e 5,2012 . WHEREFORE , b

y reaso n o f

th e above-identifie dconflic t Complainan t

respectfull y request s tha t th e Administrativ e La

w Judg e ente r

a n orde r continuin g th e Rul e 1 6 Litigatio n Schedulin g Conferenc e i

n thi s matte r

currentl y se t

fo r Jun e 5 , 2012 , t o b e reschedule da t alater date . Respectfull y submitte dthi s 13" ^ da y o f Apri l 2012 . RA^iHAW

N RIC H CtORG E Attorne y Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse lCERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y tha t acop y o f th e foregoin g Motio n fo

r Continuanc e wa s maile db y facsimil e and Federa l Expres s to : Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan DOT , Administrativ e La

w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloo r RoomEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 (FAX ) (202 ) 366-753 6 an dcertifie dan

dregula r mai l to : Ria n C . Seema

n 1243 3 Pineneedl e Driv e Indianapolis , I

N 46236-316 0 an dthe original andon e cop y vi aFederal Expres s to : Hearin g Docke t U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n Docke t Operations , M-3 0 Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloo r Roo mW12-14 0 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0

t5^*^^ . MCDOWEL

L Lega l Assistant 

### AP R 

### 1 3 201 2 Date d
#### Bobby STEVENS; et al Plaintiffs, Bobby Stevens; Josephine Stevens Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY; et al Defendants, Ford Motor Co; John Does, whose names are unknown to plaintiffs at this time, but will be substituted by amendment when ascertained; Bill Ethridge Lincoln-Mercury Inc Defendant—Appellees, Gwendolyn HILL Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ford Motor Company; et al Defendants, Ford Motor Company; Bill Ethridge Lincoln-Mercury Inc; John Does Defendant—Appellees.

No. 03-60951.

(Summary Calendar)

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

DECIDED: May 21, 2004.

Edward Morgan Blackmon, Jr., Blackmon & Blackmon, Canton, MS, Mark I. Burton, Burton & Burton, Kosciusko, MS, Robert George Clark, III, Lexington, MS, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

*497Gene Dickerson Berry, Walker W. Jones, III, Frederick Natale Salvo, III, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, Jackson, MS, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiffs Bobby and Josephine Stevens and Gwendolyn Hill bring this appeal from the district court’s denial of their Motion to Remand to state court their personal injury and property damage suit against defendants Ford Motor Company, Bill Ethridge Lincoln-Mercury and unknown John Does.

“An order denying remand of a case removed to federal court is not a final order within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and, standing by itself cannot be appealed unless certified by the district court according to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).” *Poirrier v. Nicklos Drilling Co.,*648 F.2d 1063, 1064-65 (5th Cir.1981); *Aaron v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,*876 F.2d 1157, 1160 (5th Cir.1989); *see*Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice & Procedure 2d § 3914.11. When the refusal to remand is coupled with a final judgment, the appellate court has jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion to remand. *Aaron,*846 F.2d at 1160.

The district court did not issue a final judgment in this case, nor did it certify its ruling for interlocutory appeal. This appeal is thus DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
---

CONSENT

March 31, 2014

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Primero Mining Corp. (the
      "Registrant") | 
|--- | --------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                    | 
|    | Consent of Expert                             | 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the "Annual Report").
The Annual Report incorporates by reference the Annual Information Form of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the AIF).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in the Annual Report
with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical
report (the "Technical Report") referred to in the AIF:

- Technical Report entitled San Dimas Property, San Dimas District, Durango
  and Sinaloa States, Mexico, Technical Report for Primero Mining Corp. dated
  April 16, 2012 prepared by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Sincerely,

|/s/ Rodney Webster   | 
|-------------------- | 
|Rodney Webster, MAIG | 

---
AFS-11-269-E June 01, 2011

Exemption No. 10279 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2005-20708

Capt. William Yeager Vice President Flight Operations World Airways, Inc.

101 World Drive Peachtree City, GA 30269

Dear Capt. Yeager:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8547, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 5, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of World Airways, Inc. (WA), for an extension of Exemption No. 8547, as amended. That exemption from §§ 121.665 and 121.697(a)(1), (b), and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows WA to substitute a computer application signature for the signed load manifest required by these sections. That exemption, however, expired on April 30, 2011; therefore, we will treat your request as a new petition.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to WA.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 8547 (copy enclosed), the FAA2

found that the automatic weight-and-balance system enhanced both the efficiency and the accuracy of loading the petitioner’s aircraft without it adversely affecting air safety and is, therefore, in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 8547;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 8547 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8547 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

This exem ption terminates on June 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

David Gillion Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
Christopher Lawrence SCHLOUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |            |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY X FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/    | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |            |   | Name:  | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |            |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |            |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/    | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |            |   | Name:  | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |            |   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |            |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |

----
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 7 

Recognizing the importance of access to comprehensive, high-quality, lifeaffirming medical care for women of all ages. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of access to comprehensive, highquality, life-affirming medical care for women of all ages. 

Whereas women of all ages should have access to comprehensive, convenient, compassionate, life-affirming, high-quality medical services; 

Whereas all women should feel empowered and equipped with 

the knowledge to listen to their body and advocate for 

their health; 

Whereas health care for women should emphasize the whole 

woman, including her physical, mental, and spiritual 

wellness; 

Whereas health care for women should also address the needs 

of men, families, and communities as they relate to women’s health care; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 7 IH 

Whereas health care centers should include access to social 

services that empower women to care for their health; 

Whereas Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers is a consortium of 

centers that serves as an example of the high-quality, 

comprehensive, life-affirming care that women deserve; 

Whereas every Pro Women’s Healthcare Center certified clinic has a licensed medical professional; 

Whereas every Pro Women’s Healthcare Center offers comprehensive health services, including well-woman exams, 

sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, 

breast exams, pregnancy testing, prenatal and pregnancy 

care, miscarriage support, fertility awareness instruction, 

infertility consultation, and onsite or nearby, direct referrals for material, emotional, practical, and spiritual resources; and 

Whereas Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers has certified 

health care centers nationwide that meet its standards 

for high-quality, life-affirming care and continue to do so: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its support for women nationwide 

3 to have access to comprehensive, convenient, com4 passionate, life-affirming, high-quality health care; 

5 and 

6 (2) recognizes the high standards established by 

7 Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers consortium as 

8 standards worth implementing nationwide. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**President Certification**

 

Inconnection with General Maritime Corporation’s (the “Company”) annual report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 22, 2010 | /s/ John P. Tavlarios |
|---------------------------|-----------------------|
|                      | Name:                 | John P. Tavlarios |
|                      | Title:                | President |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

----
David L. MC INTYRE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2428

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
BE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0199

IN THE MATTER OF:

S.G.-H.M., JR.,

A Former Youth under the Age of 18.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including February 16, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

James Jeremiah Shea

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 10 2020

12/10/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0199
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 995 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 995

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 13, 2024.
    Resolved, That Mr. Green of Tennessee, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Higgins of 
Lousiana, Mr. Cline, Mr. Guest, Mr. Garbarino, Ms. Greene of Georgia, Mr. 
Pfluger, Ms. Hageman, and Ms. Lee of Florida, are appointed managers to conduct 
the impeachment trial against Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland 
Security, that a message be sent to the Senate to inform the Senate of these 
appointments, and that the managers so appointed may, in connection with the 
preparation and the conduct of the trial, exhibit the articles of impeachment to 
the Senate and take all other actions necessary, which may include the 
following:
            (1) Employing legal, clerical, and other necessary assistants and 
        incurring such other expenses as may be necessary, to be paid from 
        amounts available to the Committee on Homeland Security under applicable 
        expense resolutions or from the applicable accounts of the House of 
        Representatives.
            (2) Sending for persons and papers, and filing with the Secretary of 
        the Senate, on the part of the House of Representatives, any pleadings, 
        in conjunction with or subsequent to, the exhibition of the articles of 
        impeachment that the managers consider necessary.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard G. Satin, Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of Operations and General Counsel of the Company, certifies, to
the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard G. Satin                                                         
|Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of Operations and General Counsel



Date: February 1, 2006
**Exhibit 99.17**

 

**CONSENT OF****KLAUS TRIEBEL**

 

In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 40-F of Franco-Nevada Corporation, I consent to references to my name and to the use of the technical report entitled “Palmarejo Project SW Chihuahua State, Mexico YE 2012 - Technical Report” and dated January 1, 2013 (the “Report”) in the 2012 Annual Information Form of Franco-Nevada Corporation dated March 19, 2013 (the “AIF”), which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated in, the Form 40-F.

 

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-176856) and on Form F-10 (No. 333-176722) of the references to my name and the use of the Report. I also consent to reference to me under the heading “Experts” in the AIF which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report on Form 40-F which is incorporated by reference in such Registration Statements.

 

 
| DATED:   March  19, 2013 |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| (signed)   Klaus Triebel      |   |
| Name:   Klaus Triebel         |   |

 

----