Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 13431 

Allottees must be able to obtain 

delivery of their allocations. A letter of 

commitment from each allottee’s serving 

utility or transmission provider 

confirming that the allottee will receive 

the benefit of Western’s Proposed Power 

Allocation must be received by May 11, 

2009. If a copy of the letter is not 

received by the date above, Western 

may redistribute the allottee’s portion of 

the resource pool to those allottees that 

remain. Western may extend this 

deadline for receiving a letter of 

commitment if a written request to do 

so is received by Western by the 

deadline. 

The proposed allocations shown in 

the table above are based on the LAP 

marketable resource currently available. 

If the LAP marketable resource is 

adjusted in the future, all allocations 

may be adjusted accordingly. 

III. Review Under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520, Western received approval from 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) to collect the Applicant Profile 

Data under control number 1910–5136, 

which was used to develop this 

Proposed Power Allocation. 

IV. Review Under the National 

Environmental Policy Act 

Western completed an environmental 

impact statement on the Program, 

pursuant to the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The Record 

of Decision was published in the 

Federal Register, 60 FR 53181, October 

12, 1995. Western will comply with any 

additional NEPA requirements for this 

resource pool. 

Dated: March 20, 2009. 

Timothy J. Meeks, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. E9–6882 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8591–8] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)© of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7167. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in FR 

dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR 19833). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20080528, ERP No. D–USN– 

L10006–00, Northwest Training Range 

Complex (NWTRC), To Support and 

Conduct Current, Emerging, and 

Future Training and Research, 

Development, Test and Evaluation 

(RDT&E) Activities, WA, OR and CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about impacts 

to marine resources. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20080533, ERP No. D–AFS– 

K65351–CA, Plumas National Forest 

Public Motorized Travel Management, 

Implementation, Plumas National 

Forest, Plumas County, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the scope 

of the travel management planning 

process, and potential impacts from the 

designation of the Sly Creek open area 

and associated routes to soil and water 

resources. The Final EIS should address 

seasonal closures, monitoring, and 

enforcement commitments. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090028, ERP No. D–NPS– 

F65073–IN, Indiana Dunes National 

Lakeshore, Draft White-Tailed Deer 

Management Plan, Implementation, 

Lake, Porter, LaPorte Counties, IN. 

Summary: The preferred alternative 

provides a balanced combination of 

methods to manage deer and natural 

resources. EPA does not object to this 

project. Rating LO. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20080347, ERP No. F–COE– 

D30005–MD, Atlantic Coast of 

Maryland Shoreline Protection 

Project, Proposed Dredging of Several 

New Offshore Shoals to Provide Sand 

for Borrow Sources from 2010 to 

2044, Ocean City, Worcester County, 

MD. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed action. 

EIS No. 20080378, ERP No. F–COE– 

D39028–00, Mid-Chesapeake Bay 

Island Ecosystem Restoration 

Integrated Feasibility Study, Using 

Uncontaminated Dredged Material 

from the Upper Chesapeake Bay 

Approach Channels to the Port of 

Baltimore to Restore and Protect 

Island Habitat in the Middle Portion 

of Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester 

County, MD. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. 

EIS No. 20080509, ERP No. F–IBR– 

J39037–ND, Northwest Area Water 

Supply Project, To Construct a Biota 

Water Treatment Plant, Lake 

Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin to 

Hudson Bay Basin, Divide, Williams, 

Burke, Renville, Bottineau, Pierce, 

McHenry, Ward, Mountrail and 

McLean Counties, ND. 

Summary: EPA noted that the 

preferred alternative incorporates earlier 

EPA recommendations regarding UV 

treatment technology and the need for a 

template for the adaptive management 

plan. EPA made additional comments 

regarding the water quality analysis. 

EIS No. 20090036, ERP No. F–AFS– 

F65069–MN, Glacier Project, To 

Maintain and Promote Native 

Vegetation, Communities that are 

Diverse, Productive, Healthy, 

Implementation, Superior National 

Forest, Kawishiwi Ranger District, St. 

Louis and Lake Counties, MN. 

Summary: The Final EIS addressed 

EPA’s earlier question regarding the 

projected amount of suitable habitat for 

the Northern goshawk; therefore, EPA 

does not object to the proposed project. 

Dated: March 24, 2009. 

Ken Mittelholtz, 

Environmental Protection Specialist, NEPA 

Compliance Division, Office of Federal 

Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–6886 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8591–7] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–1399 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of 

Environmental Impact Statements filed 

03/16/2009 through 03/20/2009 

pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

EIS No. 20090079, Revised Draft EIS, 

AFS, MT, Cabin Gulch Vegetation 

Treatment Project, Restore FireAdapted Ecosystems, Existing and 

Desired Conditions, Townsend Ranger 

District, Helena National Forest, 

Broadwater County, MT, Comment 

Period Ends: 05/11/2009, Contact: 

David Carroll 406–495–3716. 

EIS No. 20090080, Final EIS, AFS, CO, 

Long Draw Reservoir Project, Re-Issue 

a Special-Use-Authorization to Water 

Supply and Storage to Allow the 

Continued Use of Long Draw 

Reservoir and Dam, Arapaho and 

Roosevelt National Forests and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES