alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 858 

Acknowledging the courage and sacrifice of veterans of the Korean War 

and Korean Defense Veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2023 

Ms. LOIS FRANKEL of Florida (for herself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. CONNOLLY, 

Mr. WALTZ, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. WILLIAMS of 

Georgia, Ms. LEE of Nevada, Mr. GRIJALVA, and Mr. WITTMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Acknowledging the courage and sacrifice of veterans of the 

Korean War and Korean Defense Veterans. 

Whereas, on June 25, 1950, North Korea invaded the Republic of Korea with approximately 135,000 troops to initiate 

the Korean War; 

Whereas nearly 1,800,000 members of the United States 

Armed Forces served along with the forces of the Republic of Korea and 20 other allied nations under the United 

Nations Command to defend freedom and democracy in 

the Korean Peninsula; 

Whereas the United States suffered 36,574 dead and 

103,284 wounded during the Korean War in some of the 

most horrific conditions in the history of warfare; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 858 IH 

Whereas 70 years have passed since the signing of the ceasefire agreement at Panmunjom on July 27, 1953, and the 

Korean Peninsula still technically remains in a state of 

war; 

Whereas, known as ‘‘Korean Defense Veterans’’, nearly 

25,000 United States soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines remain stationed in South Korea to continue protecting democracy, and hundreds of these brave 

servicemembers have tragically perished in their efforts to 

preserve the armistice; 

Whereas the Korean War has become a ‘‘Forgotten War’’ for 

many Americans; 

Whereas many members of the Armed Forces who fought in 

the Korean War returned home without the fanfare that 

greeted the heroes of World Wars I and II; 

Whereas veterans of the Korean War and Korean Defense 

Veterans deserve to be recognized by all Americans for 

their honorable service during and after the Korean War 

in defense of democracy and freedom; and 

Whereas the people of the United States and the Republic of 

Korea are eternally grateful to the veterans of the Korean War and Korean Defense Veterans: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the importance of the contributions and sacrifices 

3 made by the veterans of the Korean War and Korean De4 fense Veterans. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1329 

KA 13-00719 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAREEM HOWARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KAREN RUSSO-MCLAUGHLIN

OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M.

William Boller, A.J.), rendered November 13, 2012. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession

of a weapon in the second degree and criminal sale of a firearm in the

second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him,

upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the

second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal sale of a firearm

in the second degree (§ 265.12 [2]). We agree with defendant that the

waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the

severity of the sentence. During the plea colloquy, Supreme Court

advised him that he was waiving his right to appeal from the

conviction only and failed to make any reference to the effect that

the waiver would have on any challenge to the severity of his sentence

(see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928; People v Peterson, 111 AD3d

1412, 1412). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not

unduly harsh or severe.

As the People correctly concede, the presentence report has not

been redacted as the court ordered at sentencing, and therefore it

must be redacted to correct the oversight (see generally People v

Abuhamra, 107 AD3d 1630, 1631-1632, lv denied 22 NY3d 1038).

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         951,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,020,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                   501,035
<INVENTORY>                                 29,211,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,429,173
<PP&E>                                      12,189,811
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,172,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,157,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,256,669
<BONDS>                                     27,303,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       131,220
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,263,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,157,075
<SALES>                                     37,497,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,497,298
<CGS>                                       29,919,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,919,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,622,590
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,573,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,481,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                   526,637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            759,793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   759,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
Docket No: FAA-2015-8463 Dir iD: 2014-NM-226-AD

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 9/24/14

Regional Airline Association 9/24/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 9/24/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 9/24/14
u.s. DEPARTMENT oF TRANSPORTATimR E C E I\/ ED 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASIDNGTON,D.C. JUL 1 4 2015 

In The Matter Of: 

PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT TRANSPORT, INC. 

Respondent. · 

HEARING DOCKET 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0638 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

FAA Case No. 2014S0190149 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hereby designates the undersigned as its 

representative in this matter, replacing the previously identified counsel, who is no longer an 

employee of the FAA: 

Christopher Stevenson 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southern Region 

P.O. Box 20636 

. Atlanta, GA 30320. 

telephone: ( 404) 305-5208 

facsimile: ( 404) 305-5223 

e-mail: chris.stevenson@faa.gov 

All future correspondence and communication in this matter should be addressed to the 

undersigned. 

'} .... 1'1 

itted this _&_day of July, 2015. 

CHRISTOPHER K STEVENSON 

Attorney · '·' 

Office of the Regional Cot\nsel 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice of Appearance was sent: 

original and one copy via certified mail to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

one copy via certified mail and facsimile to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

Mark B. Goldstein, Esq. 

2700 N. Military Trail, Suite 130 

Boca Raton, FL 33431 

Facsimile: (561) 989-9966 

Wo~~lA~-\ Legal Assistant 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Dated
**CERTIFICATIONS****Exhibit 31.1**I, David G. Mazzella, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 11, 2006 By: /s/David G. Mazzella         David G. Mazzella
[No. 50925-0-I.

Division One.

April 12, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Susan Gay Lemery, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Sno-homish County, No. 01-1-01174-4, Ellen J. Fair, J., entered July 26, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Ellington, A.C.J., and Appelwick, J.
Exhibit 34.2



[exhibit342002.gif]

KPMG LLP

303 East Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60601-5212

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Citibank, N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(0, 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP





Chicago, Illinois

February 26, 2010



KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.

member firm of KMPG International, a Swiss cooperative.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Report of Synthetech., Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, M. Sreenivasan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ M. Sreenivasan
-------------------
M. Sreenivasan
President & C.E.O.
August 12, 2002
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

(as of March 31, 2010)



|                                                       |  |                              
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Entity                                         |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                                       | 
|Stanley Space Limited                                  |  | British Virgin Islands       
|                                                       | 
|Wisecon Limited                                        |  | Hong Kong                    
|                                                       | 
|Shanghai ChemSpec Corporation                          |  | PRC                          
|                                                       | 
|Taixing ChemSpec Specialty Chemicals Co., Ltd          |  | PRC                          
|                                                       | 
|Shanghai Qi Yue Trading Co., Ltd                       |  | PRC                          
|                                                       | 
|Shanghai Wan Su Chemicals Co., Ltd                     |  | PRC                          
|                                                       | 
|Zhejiang Huajing Flurochemical and Technology Co., Ltd |  | PRC                          
|                                                       | 
|Quzhou Kangpeng Chemicals Co., Ltd                     |  | PRC                          
|                                                       | 
|Jiangsu Wei Er Chemicals Co., Ltd                      |  | PRC                          
|                                                       | 
|Binhai Kangjie Chemicals Co., Ltd                      |  | PRC                          
|                                                       | 
|Jiangsu Kangpeng Nong Hua Co., Limited                 |  | PRC
EXHIBIT 99.2

                 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the
"Corporation")  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
of  the  Corporation  certifies  that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Corporation.



  /s/ Steven R. Norton
-----------------------------------------
Steven R. Norton
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
May 15, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Concurrent Computer Corporation and will be retained by Concurrent
Computer Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140774

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140774 COA: 287844 Kent CC: 08-001544-FH DAVID MICHAEL LEHMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Charles Joseph TARBUNAS, III, Appellant, v. Amy Lorraine TARBUNAS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4889

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

## AGENDA

# TIME AND DATE:

9:00 a.m., Tuesday, January 23, 2018.

# PLACE:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS:

The one item is open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

5292  Aircraft Accident Report—Uncontained Engine Failure and Subsequent Fire, American Airlines Flight 383, Boeing 767-323, N345AN, Chicago, Illinois, October 28, 2016.

# NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100. The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour prior to the meeting for set up and seating.

                        Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314-6305 or by email at                         *Rochelle.McCallister@ntsb.gov*                         by Wednesday, January 17, 2018.                    

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

                        Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also available at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Candi Bing at (202) 314-6403 or by email at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MEDIA INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Peter Knudson at (202) 314-6100 or by email at                         *peter.knudson@ntsb.gov.*

Dated: December 29, 2017.

LaSean McCray,

Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2017-28508 Filed 12-29-17; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
Timothy D. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3681

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jessica FRIEDEBORN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D17-3814

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018

Jessica Friedeborn, Ocala, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the June 15, 2017, judgments and sentences in Case No. 17-CF-1152 in the Circuit Court in and for Marion County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.