alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
DAUGHERTY RESOURCES, INC.                                             EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(United States Dollars)
Unaudited



         The table below presents information necessary for the computation of
earnings or loss per share of common stock, on both a primary and fully diluted
basis, for the six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, and the years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997. The computations below reflect the 1 for 5
Reverse Stock Split effective June 30, 1998.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Six months
                                                    Ended June 30,                Years Ended December 31,
                                               -----------------------     -----------------------------------------

                                                  2000          1999           1999          1998           1997
                                               ----------    ----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                            <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
Net loss applicable to share of
Common Stock and Common
Stock Equivalents                              $  528,491    $  177,509    $(7,220,920)   $(1,568,348)   $(1,708,418)

Average number of shares of
Common Stock Outstanding                        2,545,540     2,272,182      2,261,754      2,035,188      1,831,926

Common Stock equivalents*                       5,984,697     5,933,586            -0-            -0-            -0-
                                               ----------    ----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
Total shares of Common Stock and
Common Stock equivalents                        8,525,325     8,205,768      2,261,754      2,035,188      1,831,926
                                               ==========    ==========    ===========    ===========    ===========
Primary loss per share of
Common Stock                                   $     0.21    $     0.08    $     (3.19)   $     (0.77)   $     (0.93)
                                               ==========    ==========    ===========    ===========    ===========
Fully diluted loss per share of
Common Stock*                                  $     0.06    $     0.02    $     (3.19)   $     (0.77)   $     (0.93)
                                               ==========    ==========    ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE>

*Common Stock equivalents are considered anti-dilutive in periods when the
 Company experiences losses.



                                       v
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard G. Satin, Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of
Operations and General Counsel of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard G. Satin                                                         
|Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of Operations and General Counsel
|                                                                             
|Date: February 8, 2008                                                       



- 37 -
Exhibit 32





Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the “Act”) and Rule 15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), each of the undersigned, Mack Sanders, Chief Executive Officer of EVCARCO, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Nikolay Frolov, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A 2 for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 6 , 2011


By:
/s/ Mack SandersMack SandersChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)By:
/s/ Nikolay FrolovNikolay FrolovChief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the three month period ending March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                    51,318
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           276,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                          (129,539,646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             276,318
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               0
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         175,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,212,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (3,545,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (3,545,389)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (3,545,389)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (5,849.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (5,849.89)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE





In connection with the report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Allen D. Goodman, Principal Financial Officer of Price Asset Management, Inc., the managing member of RICI® Linked – PAM Advisors Fund, LLC (the Fund), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.











/s/ Allen D. Goodman


Allen D. Goodman


Chief Financial Officer


Price Asset Management, Inc.


Managing Member


RICI® Linked – PAM Advisors Fund, LLC


March 30, 2011
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 14, 2013

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

EVERETT HOUCK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD BALL; JUDGE DAN

OWENS; PRISCILLA PRESLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-6301

(D.C. No. 12-CV-01218-HE)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, HOLMES, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.**

Everett Houck filed a pro se complaint against Harold Ball, Judge Dan

Owens, and Priscilla Presley, the Oklahoma County Court Clerk, seeking relief

under 18 U.S.C. § 242, a criminal provision concerning the deprivation of

constitutional rights under color of law. R. 3–5. The district court dismissed the

action for failure to state a claim on the ground that § 242 does not provide a

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
private right of action. R. 10–11. On appeal, Mr, Houck argues that the case was

dismissed prematurely. The district court was correct as there is no private right

of action under § 242. See Robinson v. Overseas Military Sales Corp., 21 F.3d

502, 511 (2d Cir. 1994) (no private right of action under § 242); see also

Newcomb v. Ingle, 827 F.2d 675, 676 n.1 (10th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (no

private right of action under § 241).

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge

- 2 -
Otha K. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 28, 2018

Otha K. Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(1). Any request for belated appeal must be filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

Wetherell, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Michael W. CORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3079

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 28, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*484Upon consideration of Appellant's response to the Court's order of December 18, 2017, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not a final, appealable order. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2) ; *Young v. State* , 66 So.3d 1076 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Wetherell, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of _Rider Exploration, Inc.. for the year ended _10/31/11_ fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended ___10/31/11_, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of _ Rider Exploration, Inc . |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/   Hakim               |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                     |   |
|   | Name:  | Hakim                                    |   |
|   |   |                                     |   |
|   | Title: | Principal Executive Officer,             |   |
|   |   | Principal Financial Officer and Director |   |
|   |   |                                     |   |
|   | Date:  | 2/14/12                                  |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,531,191
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         152,499
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            12,400,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 60,193,792
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      14,559,149
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        75,138,477
<LOANS>                                     98,494,076
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,709,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             203,491,413
<DEPOSITS>                                 172,169,547
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         15,133,284
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,239,775
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,140,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             203,491,413
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,447,188
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,287,757
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                11,313
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,746,258
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             961,085
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,081,864
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,664,394
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  210,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,675,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,422,770
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     880,924
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   880,924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.24
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,040,422
<LOANS-PAST>                                    65,137
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,449,253
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                    50,273
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,709,526
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,709,526
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        453,600
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Myrexis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                                             
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 13, 2010 |  | /s/    ADRIAN N.
HOBDEN                     
|                          |  | Adrian N. Hobden, Ph.D.                     
|                          |  | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                          |  | (principal executive officer)               
|                          | 
|Dated: September 13, 2010 |  | /s/    ROBERT J.
LOLLINI                    
|                          |  | Robert J. Lollini                           
|                          |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                          |  | (principal accounting and financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Timothy Finell WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2024

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 18, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Alecia Eckardt GRAY, a/k/a Alicia Gray and Shane Higgins as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donald D. Gray, Appellants, v. Thomas G. DIGGES, Jr., as Trustee of the Denise Z. Digges Family Trust, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3820 4D17-125

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41465

Summary Calendar

 

THADDEUS EVANS BURNS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-96-CV-736

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Thaddeus Evans Burns, Texas prisoner # 562561, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas

corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that the trial

court’s erroneous inclusion of the mental state of recklessness

in its jury instruction regarding aggravated assault, the crime

of conviction, deprived him of a fair trial.

We have reviewed the federal and state records and the

briefs submitted by the parties and conclude that the jury 
No. 97-41465

-2-

instruction was harmless error. See Harris v. Warden, Louisiana

state Penitentiary, 152 F.3d 430, 434-36 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Accordingly, the state appellate court’s adjudication of the

issue was not contrary to and did not result in an unreasonable

application of federal law.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
No. 97-41465

-3-

H:\BURNS.OP
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 20 15-CE-039-AD 

Add the work hours. parts cost, and number ol US. registured product:s to the rahlu he/ow. Whun you arc 

.fiuished. dick on The ··Update Field:s ., huttnn To aWollwtiwl/y .fi/1 in The totals. 

Update Fields I 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do not include on- (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

"n ·w~t11m. rt:pair. 

t'h.:. 

A one-time inspection 

in accordance with .5 work-hours 0 35 

Piper SB 1213A 

This installs the Piper 

MOD kit in accordance 2 work-hours $20.95 380 

with Piper SB 1188 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $78,426.00 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ \\ :1r···m·~ 

On-Condition Costs: @ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection 

If the inspection reveals 

a misrouted cable 

Reroute the cable in 2 $21.00 

accordance with Piper 

SBI2 13A 

8 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 0 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 0 

YES* 0 NO ~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. G 

YES 0 NO IZI 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? G 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

9