alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the September 30, 2000 10-Q Balance Sheets, Income Statements,
and Cash Flow Statements, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     Mar-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                          Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                    7182000
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              445000
<ALLOWANCES>                                15000
<INVENTORY>                               4356000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         13010000
<PP&E>                                   13006000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           26016000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      491000
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    14000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                               24901000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             26016000
<SALES>                                   3780000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3780000
<CGS>                                     3229000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             4134000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (252000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (96000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (156000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (156000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.01)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the
"Corporation")  for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2004, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Corporation
certifies  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the  Corporation.


February 4, 2005


                                     /s/ T. Gary Trimm
                                    ------------------------
                                    Name: T. Gary Trimm
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Paul D. Meringolo, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge
and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul D. Meringolo                                       
|Paul D. Meringolo                                           
|Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President
|                                                            
|Date: August 9, 2010
Kenneth BURTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Lee Arthur BURTON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1841

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michael J. CANNIVET and Catherine Cannivet, Appellants, v. CHRISTIANA TRUST, a division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB, as trustee FOR STANWICH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, Series 2012-13, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3578

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph Leroy JONES-EL, Appellant/Petitioner(s) v. COOSEMANS TAMPA, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the
“Corporation”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation
certifies that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.








Date: May
2, 2008








/s/
      Dan MondorDan
      MondorPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NIKITA RAY COLEMAN, a/k/a Heavy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:19-cr-00017-D-1; 4:21-cv-00142-D)

Submitted: November 18, 2022 Decided: November 30, 2022

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nikita Ray Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6683 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/30/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Nikita Ray Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000)). 

Here, the district court summarily adopted the reasoning in the Government’s 

memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss, offering no independent explanation for 

dismissing Coleman’s § 2255 motion. Although the district court should have enumerated 

the issues Coleman raised and explained its reasons for denying relief, see United States v. 

Marr, 856 F.2d 1471, 1472-73 (10th Cir. 1988), we are able to conclude through our 

independent review of the record that Coleman has not made the requisite showing for a 

certificate of appealability. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6683 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/30/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6683 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/30/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 60 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 60

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 26, 2023.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Hoyer, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, 
Ms. Lee of California, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Ruppersberger, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, 
Mr. Cuellar, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Cartwright, Ms. Meng, Mr. 
Pocan, Mr. Aguilar, Ms. Lois Frankel of Florida, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mrs. 
Torres of California, Mr. Case, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Harder of California, Ms. 
Wexton, Mr. Trone, Ms. Underwood, Mrs. Lee of Nevada, Mr. Morelle.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
----

|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/      Emory O. Berry                                                    |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Emory      O. Berry                                                        |   |
|   |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of    Operations |   |
|   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)                          |   |

----
SOUTH CAROLINA 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS 

REGULATION 61-62.5 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL STANDARDS 

STANDARD NO. 2 

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

 The following table constitutes the ambient air quality standards for the State of South Carolina. The 

analytical methods to be used will be those applicable Federal Reference Methods published in 40 CFR 50, 

Appendices A-N as revised July 18, 1997. In the case of fluorides either the double paper tape sampler 

methods (ASTM D-3266-79) or the sodium bicarbonate-coated glass tube and particulate filter method 

(ASTM D3268-78) may be used. 

 Pollutant Measuring Interval Micrograms Per Cubic Meter 

Unless Noted Otherwise (1) (2)

Sulfur Dioxide 3 hours 

 24 hours 

 annual 

 1300 (4)

 365 (4)

 80 

Total Suspended Particulates Annual Geometric Mean 75 

PM10 24 hours 

 annual 

 150 (3)

 50 (3)

PM 2.5 (Primary and Secondary 

Standards) 

 24 hours 

 annual 

 35 (3)

 15 (3)

Carbon Monoxide 1 hour 

 8 hour 

 40 mg per cubic meter 

 10 mg per cubic meter 

Ozone 8 hours 

 8 hours 

 0.08 ppm (3) (5)

 0.075 ppm (3)

Gaseous Fluorides (as HF) 12 hr. avg. 

 24 hr. avg. 

 1 wk. avg. 

 1 mo. avg. 

 3.7 

 2.9 

 1.6 

 0.8 

Nitrogen Dioxide annual 100 

Lead Rolling 3-month Average 0.15 

(1) Arithmetic Average except in case of total suspended particulate matter 

(2) At 250

 C and 760 mm Hg. 

October 23, 2009 62.5, St. 2 - Page 1
October 23, 2009 62.5, St. 2 - Page 2

(3) Attainment determinations will be made based on the criteria contained in 40 CFR 50 Appendices H, 

I, K and N. 

(4) Not to be exceeded more than once a year. 

(5) The 1997 standard – and the implementation rules for that standard – will remain in place for 

implementation purposes as EPA undertakes rulemaking to address transition from the 1997 ozone standard to 

the 2008 ozone standard. 

R. 61-62.5, Standard No. 2 History - South Carolina State Register: 

 Vol. 9, Issue No. 5, (Doc. No. 457), May 24, 1985; 

 Vol. 12, Issue No. 4, (Doc. No. 970), April 22, 1988; 

 Vol. 13, Issue No. 2, (Doc. No. 868), February 24, 1989; 

 Vol. 28, Issue No. 9, (Doc. No. 2912), September 24, 2004; 

 Vol. 32, Issue No. 10, (Doc. No. 3224), October 24, 2008; 

 Vol. 33, Issue No. 10, (Doc. No. 4082), October 23, 2009.
Patrick Jay BANKS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

/s/ A. Leon Blaser

A. Leon Blaser, Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 30, 2004
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 90 6 . J OHN I . PAULK, J R . v . CARROLL COUNTY, GEORGI A et a l

. Up o n co n s i d e r a t i o n o f Ap p el lan t ’ s m o t i o n t o t ran s fer ap p eal t o t he Su p rem e Co u rt , t h e m o t i o n i s h ereb y GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## April 25, 2019

04/25/2019
# Euroopan unionin C 450I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 450I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 63. vuosikerta28. joulukuuta 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 450I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

63. vuosikerta28. joulukuuta 2020

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tiedotteet |
| | EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET |
| | Euroopan komissio |
| 2020/C 450 I/01 | Lausuma: Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetus asetuksen (EU) N:o 1303/2013 muuttamisesta Investoinnit kasvuun ja työpaikkoihin -tavoitteen mukaisten poikkeuksellisten lisämäärärahojen ja toteutusjärjestelyjen osalta avustuksen antamiseksi covid-19-pandemian aiheuttaman kriisin vahinkojen korjaamisen tukemiseen sekä pohjan luomiseen talouden vihreälle, digitaaliselle ja palautumiskykyä tukevalle elpymiselle (REACT-EU) – Säädöksen hyväksyminen | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

IV   Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Euroopan komissio

2020/C 450 I/01

Lausuma: Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetus asetuksen (EU) N:o 1303/2013 muuttamisesta Investoinnit kasvuun ja työpaikkoihin -tavoitteen mukaisten poikkeuksellisten lisämäärärahojen ja toteutusjärjestelyjen osalta avustuksen antamiseksi covid-19-pandemian aiheuttaman kriisin vahinkojen korjaamisen tukemiseen sekä pohjan luomiseen talouden vihreälle, digitaaliselle ja palautumiskykyä tukevalle elpymiselle (REACT-EU) – Säädöksen hyväksyminen

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

IV Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Euroopan komissio

| 28.12.2020 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 450/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2020

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 450/1

---

Lausuma: Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetus asetuksen (EU) N:o 1303/2013 muuttamisesta Investoinnit kasvuun ja työpaikkoihin -tavoitteen mukaisten poikkeuksellisten lisämäärärahojen ja toteutusjärjestelyjen osalta avustuksen antamiseksi covid-19-pandemian aiheuttaman kriisin vahinkojen korjaamisen tukemiseen sekä pohjan luomiseen talouden vihreälle, digitaaliselle ja palautumiskykyä tukevalle elpymiselle (REACT-EU) – Säädöksen hyväksyminen

(2020/C 450 I/01)

KOMISSION LAUSUMA

Lausuma johdanto-osan 6 kappaleesta

Komissio pitää valitettavana, että Euroopan parlamentti ja neuvosto sopivat ilmastomenoja koskevan tavoitteen esittämisestä johdanto-osan kappaleessa sen sijaan, että olisi vahvistettu oikeudellisesti sitova tavoite artiklassa. Komissio katsoo, ettei tämä anna komissiolle tarkoituksenmukaisia oikeudellisia keinoja, joilla se voi varmistaa tehokkaasti, että REACT-EU-varojen osuus riittää saavuttamaan sovitun tason, jolla päästään monivuotiselle rahoituskehykselle ja Euroopan unionin elpymisvälineelle yhteisesti asetettuun ilmastorahoitusosuuden kokonaistavoitteeseen, toimielinten sopimuksen 15 kohdan mukaisesti.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6285

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARMEN BLANCO CRUZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-93-267, CA-98-714-9-8)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

W. Gaston Fairey, FAIREY, PARISE & MILLS, P.A., Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew R. Hubbell, Assistant United

States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carmen Cruz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We

have reviewed the record, the district court’s order, and the

transcript of the hearing at which the court stated its reasons for

denying Cruz’ motion and find no reversible error. We agree with

the district court that counsel’s alleged error was not a structural defect in Cruz’ trial and that Cruz failed to satisfy the

standard for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel as set

forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Leon Wayne ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jenez FOURNETT v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-0276

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.
Alfred MCDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5626

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document

EXHIBIT 10.23

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
AMGEN NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 16, 2013
The Amgen Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated Effective October 16, 2013 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2022, as follows:
1.Section 3.3 (“Delayed Commencement Election”) is amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
The opportunity to delay the effective date of deferral elections as described in this Section 3.3 applies to Plan Years beginning prior to January 1, 2022.  In no event may a Participant delay the effective date of his or her deferral elections for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2022.
2.Section 4.1 (“Short-Term Payout”) is amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
The ability to irrevocably elect a Short-Term Payout for Annual Deferral Amounts as described in this Article 4 applies to Plan Years beginning prior to January 1, 2022.  In no event may a Participant elect a Short-Term Payout for Annual Deferral Amounts for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2022.
To record this Third Amendment to the Plan as set forth herein, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute this document this 25th day of October, 2021.
AMGEN INC.
By:      /s/ Lori A. Johnston        
Name: Lori A. Johnston
Title: Executive Vice President, Human Resources
Exhibit 34.2
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
   
    
    Servicing criterion 1122(d)(1)(iii) is applicable only with respect to the Companys
continuing obligation to act as, or locate a, successor servicer under the circumstances
referred to in certain transaction agreements. It is managements interpretation that the
Company has no other active back-up servicing responsibilities in regards to 1122(d)(1)(iii)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. Furthermore, Managements Assertion of
Compliance indicates that there were no activities performed related to this criterion during
the year ended December 31, 2009 with respect to the Platform, because there were no
occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform such activities.
    
    Servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(iii) is applicable to the activities the Company performs
with respect to the Platform only as it relates to the Companys obligation to report
additions, removals or substitutions on reports to investors in accordance with the
transactions agreements.




---



##### 



2