T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J ULI O LEONEL M AZARI EGOS DI AZ; DO NI DA NI LO M AZARI EGOS DI AZ, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70181 A ge nc yN os . A 070- 541- 361

A 098- 814- 268 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M a y15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jul i o L eonel M az ar i egos D i az and D on i D ani l o M az ar i egos D i az , nat i ves a nd c i t i z e ns of

G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i on pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A p p ea ls’ (“B IA ”) o rd erd ism issin g th eir ap p ea l fro m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s 

# FI LED MA Y22 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70181 2 deci si on denyi ng thei r app l i ca t i on for a sy l um , w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and rel i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s tan tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s , Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1184- 85 ( 9th C i r . 2006) , a nd w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. S u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e B I A ’s f in d in g th a t p e titio n e r s f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te th e ys u f

f e r e dh a rm r is in g to th e le v e l o f p a s t p e r s e c u tio n . See N ah rv an iv. G on zales , 399 F . 3d 1148, 1153 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( no pa s tpe r s e c ut i on w he r e the pe t i t i one rw a s notphy s i c a l l yha rm e d orde t a i ne d, a nd onl ys uf f e r e d de m i ni m us prop erty dam age and anon ym ou s, vagu e threa t s) . S ub st ant i alevi dence al so supp ort s the B IA ’ s f i nd i ng thatpet i t i on er s f ai l ed t o est abl i sh a w el l -f ou nd ed f e a ro f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n w h e r e th e yo n lya s s e rt ag e n e r a l f e a ro f c r im e in G u a te m a la . Se e G o rm le yv . A s h c r o

ft , 364 F . 3d 1172, 1180 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( f e a rof di s c r i m i na t i on a nd r a ndom c r i m i na l a c t s di d note s t abl i s h aw e l l - f ounde d f e a rof f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n ) ; Mo l i n a - Es tra da v . I NS , 29 3 F . 3d 10 89 , 10 95 -96 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( agencyprop er l y r el i ed on a S t at e D epartm entre po rtt o d et erm i ne w hether the pe t i t i one rha d aw e l l - f ounde d f utur e f e a r ) . A c c or di ngl y , pe t i t i one r s ’ a s y l um cl ai m fai l s.10- 70181 3 B e c au s e p e titio n e r s f

a ile dto m e e t th e lo w e rb u r d e n o f p r o o f f o ra s y lu m , it f o llo w s th a t th e yh a v e n o t m e t th e h ig h e rs tan d a r df o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See Zehat ye , 453 F . 3d a t1190. F i nal l y, subst ant i alevi dence al so supp ort s the B IA ’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef be c aus e pe t i t i one r s f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n notthe yw i l l be to rtu r e db yo rw ith th e a c q u ie s c e n c e o f th e g o v e rn m e n t o f

G u a te m a la . See Si laya v. Mukasey , 5 2 4 F .3 d1 0 6 6 , 1 0 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.