alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This
      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
      63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
      of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
      by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange
      Act,
      except as otherwise stated in such filing.





Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





As
      adopted pursuant to





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithtown Bancorp (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2008, (the “Report”), I, Bradley E. Rock,
      Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in
      my
      capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                November 7, 2008
            /s/
                Bradley E. RockBradley
                E. Rock, Chairman, Presidentand
                Chief Executive Officer
EX PARTE Weldon BERRY, Jr.

CR-15-1157

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 24, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898











CHINA VoIP & DIGITAL TELECOM INC.

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of China VoIP & Digital Telecom Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to Section 7(viii) of the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2007, by and among the Company and the investors identified on the Schedule of Buyers attached thereto (the "Securities Purchase Agreement"), hereby represents, warrants and certifies to the Buyers as follows (capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement):




1.

The representations and warranties made by the Company as set forth in Section 3 of the Securities Purchase Agreement are true and correct as of the date hereof (except for representations and warranties that speak as of a specific date which shall be true and correct as of such specified date).




2.

The Company has, in all respects, performed, satisfied or complied with all covenants, agreements and conditions required to be performed, satisfied or complied with by it at or prior to the date hereof under the Transaction Documents.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificate this 21st day of December 2007.










___________________________

Name:

Title:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard G. Satin, Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of
Operations and General Counsel of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard G. Satin                                                        
|Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of Operationsand General Counsel
|                                                                            
|Date: October 31, 2006
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*Parsons.

Decided November 17, 1900.

*CoNxempt*— Punishable, *When.*

The presentation of a respectful, but illegal, petition to a circuit court in a respectful manner by an attorney at law, though improper, does not amount to a punishable contempt. *State v. Hansford,*28 S. E. 791, (43 W. Va. 773). (p. 275).

Error to .Circuit Court, Tucker County.

A. B. Parsons was found guilty of contempt, and brings error.

*Reversed.*

*J.*P. Soott and A. B. Pahsons, for plaintiff in error.

EdgaR P. Ruoicer, Attorney General, and L. C. Anderson, for defendant in eror.

DeNt, Judge:

Tbis case is a sequel to the case of the *State*v. Hansford, 43 W. Va. 773. The facts are fully set forth in that case, except the additional fact that the petition which was prepared by Hansford and signed by numerous citizens of Tucker County asking for a new trial in the case of the county court against Earl Degler, was handed by the defendant, A. B. .Parsons, a practicing attorney, to the circuit judge at his room in vacation. The following morning the judge called the matter up and fined the defendant twenty-five dollars for supposed contempt in presenting him such .petition. While the petition' was improper and could have no bearing on the motion for a new trial, 3ret it could not be possibly construed into a contempt of the court. It was respectful on its face, and simply evinces an overzealous interest on the part of citizens who believed that Degler had been unjustly found guilty of bastardy and a desire to sec that justice might prevail. It was a mistake of law on their part, yet it shows.no lack of confidence in the judge, but merely appeals to his sense of justice. Of course ho was hound to disregard it. This he could do in the same kindly spirit in which *276it was presented, althougli bis legal sense of honor might be wounded.

For the reasons given in the case of the *State*v. *Hansford*above refered to, the judgment must be reversed and the proceeding for contempt dismissed.

*Reversed.*
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 99




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action
Industries Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned, Paul D. Meringolo, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of
the Board and President and Richard G. Satin, Principal Financial Officer, Vice
President of Operations and General Counsel of the Company, certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                          <C>
/s/ Paul D. Meringolo                                        /s/ Richard G. Satin
--------------------------------------------                 ----------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the                     Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of
Board and President                                          Operations and General Counsel


Date:  August 5, 2003                                        Date:  August 5, 2003
     ---------------------------------------                      -----------------------------------------
</TABLE>



<PAGE>





                                        MEDICAL ACTION INDUSTRIES INC.




Dated:  August 5, 2003                  By:  /s/ Richard G. Satin
        ---------------------------          --------------------
                                             Richard G. Satin
                                             Principal Financial Officer
                                             Vice President of Operations and
                                             General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            3499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3513
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              125
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        3387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3513
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   130
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (103)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (103)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statements of Income filed as part of the report
on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such report on
Form 10-QSB / A.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Nov-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     Aug-31-2000
<CASH>                                             3,089,604
<SECURITIES>                                       2,261,380
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5,047,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                          22,634
<INVENTORY>                                        2,380,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  17,909,538
<PP&E>                                               664,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                       235,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    18,759,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             10,877,524
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               4,986
<OTHER-SE>                                         7,877,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      18,759,647
<SALES>                                           28,116,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  28,548,714
<CGS>                                             20,071,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      5,397,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   510,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2,569,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1,057,675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                1,511,374
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,511,374
<EPS-BASIC>                                              .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .25



</TABLE>
John VASQUEZ, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5326

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 23, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-21292

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VALENTINE CHAVEZ-VASQUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CR-311-1 

--------------------

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Valentine Chavez-Vasquez (“Chavez”) appeals the

sentence imposed following his guilty plea for illegal re-entry

into the United States following deportation. Chavez appeals the

district court’s imposition of a $500 fine, arguing that the

district court erred reversibly by imposing a fine based on his

ability to earn money while in prison. Chavez argues that 28

C.F.R. § 345.35(a) prohibits deportable aliens from placement in
No. 02-21292

-2-

Federal Prison Industries (“FPI”) jobs. Chavez also contends

that U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional based on Apprendi

v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

Chavez did not raise below the issue of inability to

work in prison, so we will review it for plain error only. 

Because Chavez does not argue and has not demonstrated that he is

“currently under an order of deportation, exclusion, or removal,”

he has not shown that he in ineligible for an FPI job assignment

under 28 C.F.R. § 345.35(a). The district court’s determination

that Chavez has the future ability to pay the fine through prison

earnings is not clearly, much less plainly, erroneous.

Chavez’ contention that the enhancement provisions in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional lacks merit because

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 24 (1998). See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90; United

States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). 

For the foregoing reasons, Chavez’ sentence is AFFIRMED.
Denis M. FIELD, Appellant, v. BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware Limited Liability Partnership; BDO Seidman, LLP, a New York Limited Liability Partnership; and BDO USA, LLP, a New York Limited Liability Partnership, Appellees.

No. 4D17-346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 14, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 11**

 

**CELSIONCORPORATION**

**COMPUTATIONOF EARNINGS PER SHARE**

 
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | **Three Months Ended** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | **March 31,**               | ** ** |
| ** **                                                          | ** ** | **2008**                         | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** |
|                                                                |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Net loss from  continuing operatons - basic and diluted             |       | $                                | (4,081,842 | ) | $ | (3,232,465 | ) |
| Net income from  discontinued operations - basic and diluted        |       | $                                | —     |   | $ | 874,795 |   |
| Net loss - basic  and diluted                                       |       | $                                | (4,081,842 | ) | $ | (2,357,670 | ) |
| Weighted average  shares outstanding - basic                        |       | 10,143,442                       |       | 10,746,869 |   |
| Dilutive  securities - options and warrants                         |       | —                           |       | 4,000 |   |
| Adjusted  weighted average shares outstanding - dilutive            |       | 10,143,442                       |       | 10,750,869 |   |
| Net loss from  continuing operations per common share - basic       |       | $                                | (0.40      | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) |
| Net loss from  continuing operations per common share - diluted     |       | $                                | (0.40      | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) |
| Net income from  discontinued operations per common share - basic   |       | $                                | —     |   | $ | 0.08 |   |
| Net income from  discontinued operations per common share - diluted |       | $                                | —     |   | $ | 0.08 |   |
| Net loss per  common share - basic                                  |       | $                                | (0.40      | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) |
| Net loss per  common share - diluted                                |       | $                                | (0.40      | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) |

 

·                  For the threemonth period ended March 31, 2008 outstanding warrants and options thatcan be converted into Common Stock are not included as their effect wasanti-dilutive.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1 -
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Clear Channel Capital I, LLC (the “Company”). The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 2, 2013


By:

/s/ Robert W. PittmanName:

Robert W. PittmanTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
Ronny G. AVERY, Respondent, v. George WHITE, Jr., and In Season Enterprise, LLC, Appellants.

No. ED 106230

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: October 16, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 19, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Richard J. Magee, 200 South Hanley Road, Ste.500, Clayton, MO 63105.

FOR RESPONDENT: Connie L. McFarland-Butler, 923 N. Hwy 67, Florissant, MO 63031.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

George White, Jr. and In Season Enterprise, LLC (collectively "Defendants") appeal the judgment, entered after a bench trial, awarding Ronny G. Avery ("Plaintiff") $21,235.89 on Plaintiff's claim for fraudulent transfer of marital property. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).1

1

We deny Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants' appeal, which was taken with the case.
EXHIBIT 32.1








Certification of the Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Steel Partners Holdings L.P.(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren G. Lichtenstein,  Executive Chairman of Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc., the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date:March 20, 2015/s/ Warren G. LichtensteinWarren G. LichtensteinExecutive Chairmanof Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc.





*  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ramon M. Ruiz-Comas, President and Chief Executive Officer of Triple-S
Management Corporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period ended
      June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and;

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.

Date: August 12, 2005                       By: /s/ Ramon M. Ruiz-Comas
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Ramon M. Ruiz-Comas, CPA
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer