alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P.J. 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

80) IV-E-74 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200811:58:00 AM Sheet 80 of 117 
P.2 

->' DOCKET 

A-90-37 

IV-E-74 

May 26,1998 

Meeting on New Source Review between EPA OAQPS 

and Industry Representatives with Bill Pederson 

Attendees: 

Name 

Dennis Crumpler 

Dan deRoeck 

Maine Dewbury 

Michele Dubow 

Lynn Hutchinson 

Rob Kaufman 

Amy Lilly 

Bill Pederson 

Ellen Siegler 

David Solomon 

Lydia Wegman 

Organization 

EPA, OAQPS 

EPA, OAQPS 

Proctor & Gamble 

EPA, OAQPS 

EPA, OAQPS 

American Forest & Paper Assoc. 

AAM 

Shaw, Pittman 

American Petroleum Institute 

EPA, OAQPS 

EPA, OAQPS 

Phone 

919-541-0871 

919-541-5593 

513-6344027 

919-541-3803 

919-541-5795 

202-463-2588 

703-505-7788 

202-663-8852 

202-682-8271 

919-541-5375 

919-541-5504 

Fax 

-5509 

-5509 

-5481 

-5509 

-5509 

-2423 

-8817 

-8007 

-8033 

-5509 

-2464 

Bill Pederson started the meeting. He provided a handout of talking points whichnis attached. 

Discussion: 

• Raised concern over recent policy memorandum and letters regarding BACT on 

debottlenecked units at Westvaco Plants as being inconsistent with historic EPA policy. 

[Discussion on this issue was agreed to be outside the Reform rulemaking, thus was 

deferred to another occaision]. EPA indicated it would investigate the implecations on 

the pollution control project exclusion that was proposed 

• Karen asked for specific examples of FLM unbridled discretion. 

• Discussed de minimum levels for Class 1 AQRV adverse impact. 

• We mentioned DOI is developing AQRVs in Flag. 

• Re-endorsed Allowable to Allowable - noting old unused capacity should not be allowed 

as basis for netting. 

• Description of Clean Unit test. 

Speaks to technology as a basis: (1) Generic Control Technology 

(2) Net out units should get the CU exclusion. 

No problem with normalizing for activity with exception of voluntary reductions. 

We noted the problem of PTE limits - make voluntary reductions. 

Lydia Wegman recapped the schedule. 

Timing on PCPs due to May 99 promulgation may be problematic - spoke to notion of getting 

States to submit SIP revisions even though.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of EcoLiveGreen, Corp., (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alfred
H. Tracy III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2010                   /s/ Alfred H. Tracy III
                                       -----------------------
                                       Alfred H. Tracy III
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                       515
<INVENTORY>                                     35,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,540
<PP&E>                                          14,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,624
<BONDS>                                         26,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,765
<SALES>                                        116,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,789
<CGS>                                           96,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (368)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (368)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Indian Health Service


Reimbursement Rates for Calendar Year 2018

AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is given that the Acting Director of the Indian Health 
Service (IHS), under the authority of sections 321(a) and 322(b) of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 248 and 249(b)), Public Law 83-568 
(42 U.S.C. 2001(a)), and the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (25 
U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), has approved the following rates for inpatient 
and outpatient medical care provided by IHS facilities for Calendar 
Year 2018 for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, beneficiaries of 
other Federal programs, and for recoveries under the Federal Medical 
Care Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 2651-2653). The inpatient rates for 
Medicare Part A are excluded from the table below, as they are paid 
based on the prospective payment system. Since the inpatient per diem 
rates set forth below do not include all physician services and 
practitioner services, additional payment shall be available to the 
extent that those services are provided.

Inpatient Hospital Per Diem Rate (Excludes Physician/Practitioner 
Services)

Calendar Year 2018

Lower 48 States $3,229
Alaska $3,277

Outpatient Per Visit Rate (Excluding Medicare)

Calendar Year 2018

Lower 48 States $427
Alaska $653

Outpatient Per Visit Rate (Medicare)

Calendar Year 2018

Lower 48 States $383
Alaska $595

Medicare Part B Inpatient Ancillary Per Diem Rate

Calendar Year 2018

    Lower 48 States $740
    Alaska $1,061

Outpatient Surgery Rate (Medicare)

    Established Medicare rates for freestanding Ambulatory Surgery 
Centers.

Effective Date for Calendar Year 2018 Rates

    Consistent with previous annual rate revisions, the Calendar Year 
2018 rates will be effective for services provided on/or after January 
1, 2018, to the extent consistent with payment authorities, including 
the applicable Medicaid State plan.

    Dated: December 29, 2017.
Michael D. Weahkee,
 RADM, Assistant Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service, Acting 
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-00047 Filed 1-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4165-16-P
Randy HEIMLER, Appellant, v. Leonard KRENEK and Delayne Krenek, Appellees.

No. 4D16-2184

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 19, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         375,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  557,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    363,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,296,687
<PP&E>                                      19,029,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,325,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,061,297
<BONDS>                                      3,187,377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       21,209,821
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,132,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,325,882
<SALES>                                      4,408,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,408,820
<CGS>                                        4,119,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,119,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             283,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,195,972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,195,972)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FIANCIAL  OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the First  Amended  Quarterly  Report  of Daleco  Resources
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Gary J. Novinskie,  President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Gary J. Novinskie
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Gary J. Novinskie
                            President and Chief Financial Officer
                            August 15, 2006

                                      -52-
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





As
      adopted pursuant to





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithtown Bancorp (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on August 8, 2008, (the “Report”), I, Bradley E. Rock,
      Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify in
      my
      capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                August 8, 2008
            /s/
                Bradley E. RockBradley
                E. Rock, Chairman, Presidentand
                Chief Executive Officer








This
      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
      63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
      of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
      by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange
      Act,
      except as otherwise stated in such filing.
Christopher Lee DOZIER v. STATE

CR-15-0492

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 21, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with this quarterly filing of Heroes, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Amber
Mardam-Bey, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350),
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

**/s/ *Amer A. Mardam-Bey***
Amer A. Mardam-Bey
Chief Financial Officer and CEO
November 19, 2002
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                       485
<INVENTORY>                                     34,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,400
<PP&E>                                          14,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,755
<BONDS>                                         27,423
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,285
<SALES>                                         77,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,235
<CGS>                                           64,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (591)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.04)
        

</TABLE>
Deandes Laweye YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Brian M. CASEY, Appellant, v. Julie JONES, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 16, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
----

COUNCIL OPINION

of 17 February 2005

on the updated convergence programme of Poland, 2004-2007

(2005/C 136/09)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (1), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Commission,

After consulting the Economic and Financial Committee,

HAS DELIVERED THIS OPINION:

In view of the above assessment and in light of the recommendations made by the Council under Article 104(7), the Council is of the opinion that Poland should:

Comparison of key macroeconomic and budgetary projections

----

(1)OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1.

(2)  General government balance and primary balance do not include the revenue-decreasing and hence, ceteris paribus, deficit increasing effect of the funded pension pillar (estimated at about 1.5 % of GDP p. a.)

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,843]


TDK Components USA, Inc.; Peachtree City, GA; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 9, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of TDK 
Components USA, Inc., Peachtree City, Georgia.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March, 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7128 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Cedric Antonio BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3428

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CELSION CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE § 1350

 

The undersigned hereby certifiesthat the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2008 of Celsion Corporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 14,  2008 | * * | * /s/ Paul B. Susie*         |
|-----------------------|----------|-----------------------------------|
|                  |     |  Paul B. Susie               |
|                  |     |  Chief Accounting Officer    |
|                  |     |  Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of CRH Medical Corporation
(the “Registrant”) filed under cover of Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Edward Wright, as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
and Richard Bear, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Edward Wright |                        
|----------------- | -----------------------
|Name:             | Edward Wright          
|Title:            | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:             | Date: March 30, 2017   
|                  |                        
|/s/ Richard Bear  |                        
|Name:             | Richard Bear           
|Title:            | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:             | Date: March 30, 2017   



This certification accompanies the Report
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
STATE EX REL. Deadra Ann JAMES v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2050

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in her sentence, and therefore, her filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and she fails to carry her burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated at least two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless she can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted her right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.