alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Polaris  Income  Fund  I  (the
"Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  September  30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William R. Carpenter, President of Polaris Investment Management Corporation,
the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Partnership.


POLARIS AIRCRAFT INCOME FUND I
(Registrant)
By: Polaris Investment Management Corporation,
    General Partner


By: /s/ William R. Carpenter
    ------------------------
    William R. Carpenter
    President
    November 12, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC PENSION INVESTORS '84 SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          25,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  208,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,580
<PP&E>                                       4,953,952
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,691,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,262,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,257
<BONDS>                                      1,505,201
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,899,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,697,332
<SALES>                                        369,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               535,633
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               192,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,552
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             94,552
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
        

</TABLE>
Jose Osvaldo Vega ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5438

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
   PRIME GLOBAL CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated (the “Company”) amending the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liong Tat Teh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Liong Tat Teh

Liong Tat TehDate: February 1, 2012

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Franco-Nevada Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 40-F/A, for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sandip Rana, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August 2,   2019 |                    |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                   |                    |
|                                   | /s/ Sandip Rana         |
|                                   | Sandip Rana             |
|                                   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
___________81142-1 V2__________________________ 

Page 4 is not included in this copy. 

Pages _________through __________are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

___X__ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

__ ___ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

_____ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________ 



Redaction Code 13 Redaction Code 13

Redaction Code 13 Redaction Code 13 Redaction Code 13 Redaction Code 13 Redaction Code 13

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*


Redaction Code 13 Redaction Code 13

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

_____81442-1V1________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 13 through 14 are not included in this 

copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

___X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request.
Juan BEJERANO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D170-344

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 17, 2017 Rehearing Denied March 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
David G. KNOUSE, Appellant, v. Kevin O'BRIEN, Jody A. Seltzer, Hancock Bank, Climate Control Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc., Intercoastal Construction Company, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-3622

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 3, 2017 Rehearing Denied November 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
John SWEARINGEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-2687

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 844 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival of Diwali. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2023 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. 

PASCRELL, Mr. BEYER, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. PALLONE, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Mr. THANEDAR, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. COSTA, Ms. JAYAPAL, and 

Mr. BERA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the 

festival of Diwali. 

Whereas for millions of Indian-Americans, Diwali (or 

Deepavali) is a time for thanksgiving and prayer for 

health, knowledge, and peace; 

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to IndianAmericans, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, 

Jains, and others throughout the United States; 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants 

light small oil lamps, place them around the home, and 

pray for health, knowledge, and peace; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 844 IH 

Whereas celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of lamps 

symbolize the light within the individual that rids the 

soul of the darkness of ignorance; 

Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the 

lunar calendar and is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving 

and the beginning of the New Year for many Hindus; 

Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the belief that 

light triumphs over darkness, and good triumphs over 

evil; 

Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day on which the 

sixth founding Sikh guru, Guru Hargobind, was released 

from captivity by the Mughal Emperor Jehangir; 

Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of Nirvana by Lord Mahavira, the last of the 

Tirthankaras (founders of the Jain philosophy); and 

Whereas Diwali is a celebration of great importance in Indian-American communities throughout the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the historical and religious sig3 nificance of Diwali; 

4 (2) in observance of Diwali, the festival of 

5 lights, expresses its deepest respect for Indian-Amer6 icans and the Indian diaspora throughout the world 

7 on this significant occasion; 

8 (3) recognizes and appreciates the religious di9 versity in both India and the United States and 

10 throughout the world; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 844 IH 

1 (4) acknowledges and supports the relationship 

2 of collaboration and respect between the United 

3 States and India. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50306

Summary Calendar

 

ADOLPH R. VASQUEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CV-226

- - - - - - - - - -

January 12, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adolph R. Vasquez appeals the district court’s judgment for

the Commissioner in his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for

review of the decision denying him a period of disability,

disability insurance benefits, and Supplemental Security Income. 

Vasquez contends that the Commissioner erred in rejecting

his subjective complaints of disabling pain and by including a

sit/stand option in a finding that Vasquez could perform
No. 97-50306

-2-

sedentary work. The Commissioner’s assessment of Vasquez's

severe pain complaints was supported by substantial evidence. 

See Anthony v. Sullivan, 954 F.2d 289, 292 (5th Cir. 1992). The

record lacks clinical and laboratory findings that support

Vasquez’s assertions that his pain is in fact disabling. 

See Selders v. Sullivan, 914 F.2d 614, 618-19 (5th Cir. 1990).

Regarding the sit/stand option and sedentary work, the

Commissioner credited the testimony of the vocational expert and

gave it significant weight. Cf. Scott v. Shalala, 30 F.3d 34-35

(5th Cir. 1994) (Commissioner erred by applying the medicalvocational guidelines because the guidelines did not coincide

exactly with the record evidence of disability and Commissioner's

mere passing reference to the vocational expert's testimony was

insufficient).

AFFIRMED.
Mishak GIBSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1659

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 23



W.T. Uniack & Co. CPAs, P.C.

Certified Public Accountants





Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms Consent



We consent to the inclusion in the filing of Goldland Holdings Co. on Form 10K and our report dated April 11, 2014 with respect to our audits of the financial statements of Goldland Holdings Co. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, which report appears with those financial statements referred to above. We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the heading Experts in such Prospectus.





/s/W.T. Uniack & Co. CPAs, P.C.



Alpharetta, Georgia

April 11, 2014
| 1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date   |   | /s/ Gary A. Weber    |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Gary A. Weber             |   |
|   |   | Senior Vice President and |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|   |   | November 10, 2010         |   |
EX PARTE Khomeini Nikumus DATCHER

CR-15-1212

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 3, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 916 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 916

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 625) to regulate large 
                  capacity ammunition feeding devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2023

 Ms. DeGette submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 625) to regulate large 
                  capacity ammunition feeding devices.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the 
House shall proceed to the consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. 
625) to regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices. All points 
of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 
bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
the Judiciary or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of H.R. 625.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 26, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Caldwell County Bancshares, Inc., Hamilton, Missouri; to acquire 
Horizon State Bank, Cameron, Missouri.
    2. First State Holding Co., Lincoln, Nebraska; to acquire Wallco, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire The Nehawka Bank, both in Nehawka, 
Nebraska.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31725e5c5c545f45421f5041415d58525045585e5f4271435852591f5743531f5e4356"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbf8d4d6d6ded5cfc895dacbcbd7d2d8dacfd2d4d5c8fbc9d2d8d395ddc9d995d4c9dc">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Old Point Financial Corporation, Hampton, Virginia; to acquire 
Citizens National Bank, Windsor, Virginia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 27, 
2017.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-28292 Filed 12-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard G. Satin, Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of Operations
and General Counsel of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard G. Satin                                                         
|Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of
Operations and General Counsel

Date: August 7, 2006



- 26 -
Jarvis HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-715

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.