alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Essense Water, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin Nichols, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date: November 3, 2011                 By: /s/ Kevin Nichols
                                           -----------------
                                              Kevin Nichols
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-161727) of Changyou.com Limited of our report dated February 28, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting which appears in this Form 20-F.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs Limited Company
|                                                          
|PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs Limited Company    
|Beijing, Peoples Republic of China                       
|February 28, 2011                                         



1
EXHIBIT 10.6Addendum NO. 1to theEXCESS OF LOSS RETROCESSION AGREEMENTBY AND BETWEENPLATINUM UNDERWRITERS BERMUDA, LTD.(RETROCEDANT)andPLATINUM RE (UK) LIMITED(RETROCESSIONAIRE)DATED AS OF July 1st 2006IT IS HEREBY AGREED that with effect from 1st July 2006 the TERRITORY, REINSTATEMENT andthe PREMIUM PROVISION shall be amended to read as follows:**ARTICLE 4 - TERRITORY**Coverage applies within the territorial limits of North America, South America, Japan and theCarribbean. Coverage in Japan only applies for the peril of earthquake.**ARTICLE 7 - REINSTATEMENT**Each loss hereon reduces the amount of indemnity provided under this Agreement by the amount paid.Any amount so exhausted shall be automatically reinstated from the time of the occurrence of lossand for each amount so reinstated, the Retrocedant agrees to pay an additional premium calculatedat pro rata of $5,200,000 as respects the fraction of indemnity exhausted and 100% of $5,200,000regardless of the unexpired term of this Agreement. Nevertheless, the Retrocessionaire’s liabilityshall not exceed $70,000,000 with respect to all Loss Occurrences during the term of the Agreement.**ARTICLE 8 - PREMIUM**The premium for this Agreement shall be a flat premium of $4,800,000 payable in installments of$2,200,000 January 1st 2006 and $2,600,000 July 1st 2006.
page 1 of 2

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their dulyauthorized representatives as of the date first above written.           Platinum Re (UK) Limited             By: /s/ Michael J. Coldman             Name: Michael J. Coldman      Title: Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director      Date: July 21, 2006             Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd.             By: /s/ Les Waters             Name: Les Waters      Title: Vice President      Date: July 21, 2006  
page 2 of 2
Derrick JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of mandamus is denied.
PROGRESSIVE EMPLOYER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC./TERRIE LOBB CATERING, INC. and AmTrust North America of Florida, Appellants, v. Christine GRIFFIN, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0687

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      12, 2010 | /s/ Richard B. Stern         |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                    | Richard      B. Stern        |
|                                    | Chief      Executive Officer |

----
Amendment No. 2 to 1998 Stock Option Plan


 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO THE 
 PREIT-RUBIN, INC. 
 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. (“PRI”) sponsors the PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended on one occasion; 
 WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Plan provides that, subject to certain inapplicable limitations, the Board of Directors of PRI (the “Board”) may amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to prohibit (without shareholder approval) the repricing of options; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 2008: 
 1. A new subsection (n) is added to the end of Section 6 (“Terms and Conditions of Options”) of the Plan to read as follows: 
 (n) No Repricing. Repricing of Options shall not be permitted without the approval of the shareholders of PREIT. For this purpose, a
“repricing” means any of the following (or any other action that has the same effect as any of the following): (i) changing the terms of an Option to lower its exercise price (other than on account of capital adjustments resulting
from share splits, etc., as described in Section 8); (ii) any other action that is treated as a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles; and (iii) repurchasing for cash or canceling an Option in exchange
for another award at a time when its exercise price is greater than the fair market value of the underlying Shares, unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with an event set forth in Section 9 (involving certain corporate
transactions). Such cancellation and exchange will be considered a “repricing” regardless of whether it would be treated as a “repricing” under generally accepted accounting principles and regardless of whether it is voluntary on
the part of the Optionee. 
 2. The first sentence of Section 10 (“Amendment or Termination of the Plan”) is hereby amended to
read as follows: 
 The Board, pursuant to a written resolution, may from time to time suspend or terminate the Plan or amend it and, except
as provided in Sections 2(b) and 6(n), the Committee may amend any outstanding Options in any respect whatsoever. 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PRI has caused these presents to be duly executed this 28th day of December,
2007. 
  

			
	 PREIT-RUBIN, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Bruce Goldman

	 Executive Vice President
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is
made December 21, 2007 by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and Alan F. Schultz (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective as of March 18, 1992, as amended on December 22, 1994, January 3, 1995, December 19, 1995 and
September 15, 1998, December 16, 1999 March 14, 2001, June 26, 2002, January 9, 2004 and December 21, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect an increase in the Executive’s Annual Base
Salary. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the parties hereto agree as set forth below. 
 1. The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 
 “The Executive’s Annual Base Salary (“Annual Base Salary”), payable on a biweekly basis, shall be at the annual rate
of not less than $860,000 effective January 1, 2008.” 
 2. All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect. 
 3. This instrument, together with the Employment Agreement, contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the
day and year first above written. 
  

			
	VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Barry P. Hoffman
	Name:	 	Barry P. Hoffman, Esq.
	Title:	 	Secretary
	
	/s/ Alan F. Schultz
	Alan F. Schultz
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,209,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,117,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                   183,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,937,330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,450,312
<PP&E>                                       3,221,788
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,961,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,474,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,330,804
<BONDS>                                     61,009,108
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,500
<COMMON>                                       810,975
<OTHER-SE>                                 (56,347,773)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,474,477
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,974,089
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,940,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,210,819
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               234,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,210,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (17,177,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (17,177,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (17,177,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.85)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Minerco Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10K for the year ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, V. Scott Vanis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 15th day of November, 2010.








V. SCOTT VANISV. Scott VanisChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        49,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (140,349)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (30,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-4700 CORWIN TYRELL WOODSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-94-79) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELGary R. Hershner, MORRISSEY, HERSHNER & JACOBS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, M. Hannah Lauck, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Corwin Tyrell Woodson was convicted of drug, money laundering, and firearm offenses, including using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 924(c) (1994). He was sentenced to a term of 240 months imprisonment. On appeal, we vacated W oodson's § 924(c) conviction under Bailey v. United States , ___ U.S. #6D6D 6D#, 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec. 6, 1995) (Nos. 94-7448/7492), and remanded for resentencing. See United States v. Sedgwick , Nos. 95-5417/5418/5428/5461 (4th Cir. May 29, 1996) (unpublished), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 3265 (U.S. Oct. 6, 1997) (No. 96-5768). The district court then resentenced Woodson on the remaining counts, adding an enhancement for possession of a firearm during a drug offense. United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual , § 2D1.1(b)(1) (Nov. 1995). The district court overruled Woodson's objection to the enhancement and sentenced him to a term of 240 months imprisonment. Woodson appeals, alleging that the enhancement violated his rights under the Double Jeopardy and Due Process Clauses. Finding no error, we affirm. We recently decided the issue raised here in United States v. Hillary , 106 F.3d 1170, 1171-73 (4th Cir. 1997), holding that the district court has jurisdiction to resentence a defendant on a survivingdrug conviction after he has been granted relief from a § 924(c) conviction in light of Bailey . See also United States v. Hawthorne , 94F.3d 118, 122 (4th Cir. 1996) (when a § 924(c) conviction is overturned under Bailey , the district court may consider § 2D1.1 enhancement on remand, so long as the government agrees to forego reprosecution of the § 924(c) count). B ecause this case is governed by Hillaryand Hawthorne , Woodson's contentions are without merit.
2We therefore affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CELSION CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE § 1350

 

The undersigned herebycertifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2008 of Celsion Corporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| May 12, 2009  |                                                      |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|               | */s/  Michael H. Tardugno*                                |
|               | Michael  H. Tardugno                                      |
|               | Chief  Executive Officer                                  |
|               |                                                      |
|               |                                                      |
| May 12,  2009 |                                                      |
|               | */s/ Sean  Moran*                                         |
|               | Sean  Moran                                               |
|               | Senior  Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Derrick PETTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2992

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 30, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
NOT RECOMMENDED F OR PUBL I CATI ON File Na me: 12a0186n.06 Nos. 08-4139, 09-3587 UNI TED STATES COURT OF A PPEAL S FOR THE SI XTH CI RCUI T
MUSA ABD UL

I KHARO, Petitioner,
v. ERI C H. HOL DER, J R., Attorney Gene ral, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON PETI TI ON FOR REVI EW FROM THE BO ARD OF I MMI GRATI ON APPEAL S OPI NI ON

Before: G ILMAN and WHIT E, Circuit Judges; and T HAP AR, Distr ict Judge. * RONALD L E E GI L MA N, Circuit Judge. This court’s judgme nt enter ed on Aug ust 2, 2010 was vaca

ted by the Supreme Court on J anuar y 10, 2012 and t h e ca s e rema nded for further consideration in light of Ju d ulang v. Holder , 132 S. Ct. 476 (2011). The Court in Judulang deter mined that the policy of the Boa rd of I mmigration Appea ls (B I A) in its application of § 212(c) of the I mmigration and Nationality Act to deportation case s was “ar bitrary and capr icious” under the Administrative Procedur e Ac t, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). I n the ca se bef

ore us, the B I A denied Musa Abdul I kharo a

ny consideration of relief under § 212(c) from the immigra tion judge ’s o rd er of deportation. That was due at least in part to the BIA’s now-discr edited policy of applying the “compa rable -g rounds approa ch” as fully discussed in Judulang
. The Supreme Court has called on the BIA “to devise another , equally economica l policy

T h e H o n o r a b l e A m u l R
. T h a p a r , U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t J u d g e f o r t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f K e n t u c k y , s i t t i n g b y * d e s i g n a t i o n .re s p ec t i ng elig ibilit y for § 212(c) relief , so long as it comports with ever y thing held in both t h i s decision and St. Cyr .” Judulang , 132 S. Ct. at 490. We there fore rema nd I kharo’ s case to the BIA for r econside ration in light of Judulang
.

-2-
Victor RODRIGUEZ, Appellant/Respondent, v. MARK YACHT CLUB ON BRICKELL BAY, INC., Appellee/Petitioner,

CASE NO.: 3D16-2721, 3D17-1945

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.

Dismissed as moot.

Granted. Remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 825 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 825

              Condemning antisemitism on college campuses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2023

Mr. Kiley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              Condemning antisemitism on college campuses.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) calls on campus administrators to condemn all forms of 
        antisemitism on college campuses;
            (2) calls on campus administrators to ensure Jewish 
        faculty, students, and guests can exercise the same free speech 
        rights as guaranteed to all other faculty, students, and guests 
        can exercise the same free speech rights as are guaranteed to 
        all other faculty, students, and guests without intimidation;
            (3) calls on campus administrators to ensure that no 
        speaker is prevented from speaking on campus because of their 
        Jewish heritage;
            (4) calls on campus administrators to ensure Jewish 
        students have the same opportunities as all other students on 
        campus;
            (5) calls for campus administrators to ensure the security 
        and safety of their Jewish students; and
            (6) supports the right of Americans to freely exercise 
        their religious and cultural beliefs while pursuing higher 
        education.
                                 <all>
```