alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not pre cedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30575

CARL BERNOFSKY, Dr. Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
TULANE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL., Defendants,

ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-358-C) January 8, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Dr. Carl Bernofsky appeals a n adverse summary judgment in his action against Tulane University Medical Center, et al. , and Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, in which he asserts race and age discrimination and state law claims. Having considered the record, briefs, and oral arguments of counsel, and2

substantially for the reasons assigned and authorities cited by the district court in
its comprehensive Order and Reasons signed and f iled April 15, 1997, we

AFFIRM.
----

----

First Sentry Bancshares 10K

| 1.   | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 25, 2011  |   | /s/ Geoffrey S. Sheils             |
|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Geoffrey S. Sheils                           |
|                             |   | President and Chief Executive Officer             |
|                             |   |                                              |
|                             |   |                                              |
| Date:  March 25, 2011  |   | /s/ Richard D. Hardy                         |
|                             |   | Richard D. Hardy                                  |
|                             |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Fred M. STOTT, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s) v. Paul Richard SHULL, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5633

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 03, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES BAILEY, a single man, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. CHELAN COUNTY, a Municipal Corp.; et al., Defendants - Appellees. No. 12-35990 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-00461-RHW
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Robert H. Whaley, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 4, 2013 Seattle, Washington Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Plaintiff James Bailey appeals the district court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of Defendants Mike La mon and Lee Risdon (“Defendants”), two Chelan County Sheriff deputies. We affirm. 

# FILED
DEC 06 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.1. Bailey argues that the district court erred by failing to give his Proposed Jury Instruction No. 3. The proposed instruction elaborated on the definition of “actively resisting” as that term is used in the excessive force instruction given by the district court. We disagree. There was no error in the district court’s jury instruction on the elements of Bailey’s Fourth Amendment excessive force claim. See Graham v. Connor , 490 U.S. 386, 396 (1989); Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instruction No. 9.22. The district court’s instruction allowed Bailey’s counsel to argue her theory of the case. See Brewer v. City of Napa , 210 F.3d 1093, 1097 (9th Cir. 2000)
. The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion in declining to give Bailey’ s proposed instruction defining “actively resisting.” 2. Bailey also argues that the district court erred in excluding the testimony of two of his treating physicians, Drs. Wall and Travers. Even assuming that the district court erred or abused its discretion in excluding the doctors’ testimony, the error was harmless. See Matter of Yagman , 796 F.2d 1165, 1176 (9th Cir. 1986) opinion amended on denial of reh’g sub nom. In re Yagman , 803 F.2d 1085 (9th Cir. 1986). First, there was no dispute that the officers used force to arrest Bailey, and second, the ju ry’s special verdict found that the officers did not use excessive force. 2AFFIRMED
.

3
Tony PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3145

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vladyslav Zaychenko, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Mayetok, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Mayetok, Inc.


Date: March 12, 2010                   By: /s/ Vladyslav Zaychenko
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Vladyslav Zaychenko
                                           President and Director
                                           (Principal Executive and Principal
                                           Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mayetok, Inc. and will be retained by Mayetok, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Synthetech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Form 10-Q), I, Gary Weber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    
          The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.    
          The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/
GARY A. WEBERGary A. WeberVice President, Finance,Chief Financial OfficerAugust
3, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 903 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 903

  Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2023, as the 
                    ``National Day of 3D Printing''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2023

  Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Takano, Ms. Ross, Ms. Stevens, and Mr. 
 Tonko) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2023, as the 
                    ``National Day of 3D Printing''.

Whereas additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is a process by which 
        digital 3D design data is used to build up a component in layers by 
        depositing material;
Whereas 3D printing creates an object layer by layer, greatly reducing waste and 
        increasing efficiency compared to traditional manufacturing techniques;
Whereas 3D printing has grown exponentially over the last several years;
Whereas the United States is a world leader in advanced manufacturing, and has a 
        history of design innovation;
Whereas public-private partnerships that promote advanced manufacturing, such as 
        America Makes, Manufacturing x Digital, and other Manufacturing USA 
        institutes, will develop enhanced digital capabilities to design and 
        test new products and reduce costs in manufacturing processes across a 
        variety of industries;
Whereas 3D printing has widespread applications in home construction, home goods 
        production, biotechnology, the automotive sector, aerospace, medicine, 
        consumer electronics, and defense;
Whereas 3D printing has the potential to reshape manufacturing in the United 
        States, by decreasing the cost of producing goods for small businesses 
        and local manufacturers;
Whereas innovation will be increased, as 3D printing reduces the time required 
        for product development and market launch; and
Whereas December 3, 2023, would be an appropriate date to designate as the 
        ``National Day of 3D Printing'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of the ``National Day of 3D 
        Printing'';
            (2) recognizes the economic impact of 3D printing and the 
        positive implications of 3D printing for the United States 
        advanced manufacturing sector; and
            (3) encourages the promotion and celebration of 3D printing 
        technology.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
35.1
 VW Credit, Inc. Annual Servicer Compliance Statement
Pursuant to Section 7.11 of the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement
And Item 1123 of Regulation AB
 
  
  1.
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from May 12, 2009
through December 31, 2009, and of its performance under the Transaction SUBI Servicing
Supplement was conducted under my supervision.2.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has, fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Transaction SUBI Servicing Supplement in all material respects
throughout such period.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the
Servicer this twenty-sixth day of March, 2010.
 /s/ Andrew StuartName:
    Andrew StuartTitle:
    Executive Vice President & CFO
Jean Rony BIEN-AIME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
JAMES BERNS
                                767 THIRD AVENUE
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017

                                                               December 4, 2007

Gold Run Inc.
330 Bay Street
Suite 820
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S8
CANADA


Gentlemen:

         I hereby assign and transfer 666,667 shares to the Treasury.

                                                               Sincerely,

                                                               /S/ JAMES BERNS
                                                               ---------------
                                                               James Berns
<PAGE>

                                  MICHAEL BERNS
                                767 THIRD AVENUE
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017

                                                               December 4, 2007

Gold Run Inc.
330 Bay Street
Suite 820
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S8
CANADA


Gentlemen:

         I hereby assign and transfer 1,333,333 shares to the Treasury.

                                                               Sincerely,

                                                               /S/ MICHAEL BERNS
                                                               -----------------
                                                               Michael Berns
Exhibit
      32.2





MAXUS
      REALTY TRUST, INC.





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Maxus Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Trust”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John W. Alvey,
      Vice President, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Trust, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of March
      31,
      2006 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).








/s/
      John W. Alvey


John
      W.
      Alvey


Vice
      President


Chief
      Financial & Accounting Officer


Date:
      May 12, 2006
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF**

**CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF TRMCORPORATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

              Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, I, Kenneth L. Tepper, Chief Executive Officer of TRM Corporation(the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 16, 2004 | /s/ KENNETH L. TEPPER     |
|------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                         | Kenneth L. Tepper         |
|                         | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

 

----
M.D.M. v. STATE

CR-15-0790

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016 Reh. denied October 28, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S
KENNET H NEAL

WAL KER VS. CAUSE NUMBE R PD-1429-14 THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### ORDER The a bove styled and number ed ca use is befor e this Court in Cause No. 241-0592-12 from the 241 District Court of Smit h County
.

ST The Court is of the opinion the following exhibi t should be inspected: 1. State’s Exhi bit: 25 (a CD)

Pursuant to Tex. R . App. 34.6(g )(2) , the District Clerk of Smith County is ordere d to file these exhibi ts with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 23 day of Mar ch, 2016. rd I T I S SO ORDERED THI S THE 10 DAY OF MARCH, 2016 t h

PER C URI AM EN B ANC DO NOT PUBL I SH
EXHIBIT 32.1




PRIME GLOBAL CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Global Capital Group Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Weng Kung Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) This Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.








/s/ Weng Kung Wong

Weng Kung WongDate: April 27, 2012

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT, AS AMENDED,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Fred Boehler, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Americold Realty Trust;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b) [omitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-15(a)];


(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: March 29, 2018





/s/  Fred BoehlerFred BoehlerChief Executive Officer, President and Trustee
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Natcore Technology, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles R.
Provini, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                       
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

The
foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the
provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended
to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

| |        |                                       
| | ------ | --------------------------------------
| | Date:  | May 16, 2017                          
| | By:    | (SIGNATURE)                           
| |        |                                       
| |        |                                       
| | Name:  | Charles R.
 Provini                   
| | Title: | President
 and Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit
      32.2





MAXUS
      REALTY TRUST, INC.





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Maxus Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Trust”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John W. Alvey,
      Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of March
      31,
      2007 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).








/s/
      John W. Alvey


John
      W.
      Alvey


Treasurer
      and


Principal
      Financial Officer





Date: March
      14, 2007