alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION

                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                    DECEMBER 31, 1998  DECEMBER 31, 1998
                                    -----------------  -----------------
                                      BASIC   DILUTED    BASIC   DILUTED
                                     -------  --------  -------  --------
<S>                                  <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
Average outstanding shares: . . . .   47,852    47,852   47,763    47,763
Diluted options outstanding . . . .        -     1,362        -     1,457
                                     -------  --------  -------  --------
Equivalent Shares . . . . . . . . .   47,852    49,214   47,763    49,220
                                     =======  ========  =======  ========

Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $   915  $    915  $   489  $    489
Preferred stock dividends
  and accretion of preferred shares        -         -        -         -
                                     -------  --------  -------  --------
Net income available to common
  stockholders. . . . . . . . . . .  $   915  $    915  $   489  $    489
                                     =======  ========  =======  ========
Earnings per share. . . . . . . . .  $  0.02  $   0.02  $  0.01  $   0.01
                                     =======  ========  =======  ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

Notice is hereby given that, on March 19, 2009, pursuant to the authority contained in section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) replaced the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as conservator for IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB, Pasadena, California (Association) with the FDIC as Receiver for the Association and OTS duly appointed the FDIC as sole receiver for the Association (OTS Order No. 2009-17).

Dated: March 27, 2009.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-7369 Filed 4-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Paul D. Meringolo, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of
the Board and President of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul D. Meringolo                                       
|Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President
|                                                            
|Date: February 8, 2008                                      



- 36 -
Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA- HQ - OAR- 2011 - 0083

February 23 , 2011 The contents of the following dockets are hereby incorporated by reference into and are considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA - H Q - OAR- 201 1 - 0083 ( Deferral for CO 2 emissions from Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Programs: Proposed Rule ): 1) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0560 (Information on GHG Emissions Associated with Bioene rgy and Other Biogenic Sources) 2) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0841 ( PSD and Title V Permitting Guidance for Greenhouse Gases) 3) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0517 (Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule) 4) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2008 - 0508 (Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program) Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy

at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW , Washington, DC 20004. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566 - 1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 5 66 - 1742.
#### Erik Manfredo De Leon MAZARIEGO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-73778.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Erik Manfredo De Leon Mazariegos, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Counsel, Esq., Of*190fice of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Andrew M. Eschen, Esq., TJ.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Erik Manfredo De Leon Mazariego, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000), and reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary result, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ properly concluded that Mazariego failed to establish past persecution because he testified that he was only threatened by Guatemalan guerillas. *See Lim v. INS,*224 F.3d 929, 936-37 (9th Cir.2000).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s individualized determination that changed country conditions in Guatemala undermined Mazariego’s fear of future persecution. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 1000-01 (9th Cir.2003).

Because Mazariego did not establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that he failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003).

Mazariego’s contention that the BIA’s decision without opinion violates due process is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 851 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Richard W. KUHN, DC# H48705, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kortne Jayoun STURGIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4200

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 33.3
 MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
  Platform i e
 Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Period
 Managements interpretation of Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Third parties classified as vendors




---



##### 



DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Gary R. VaughnName:
    Gary R. VaughanIts: Managing DirectorBy:
    /s/ David CoName:
    David CoIts: DirectorBy:
    /s/ Matt BowenName:
    Matt BowenIts: DirectorBy:
    /s/ Kevin FischerName:
    Kevin FischerIts: DirectorBy:
    /s/ Robert FrierName:
    Robert FrierIts: DirectorDEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICASBy:
    /s/ Kevin C. WeeksName:
    Kevin C WeeksIts: Managing DirectorBy:
    /s/ Jenna KaufmanName:
    Jenna KaufmanIts: Director
aaww-ex1041_829.htm



Exhibit 10.4.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC.

2018 INCENTIVE PLAN

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the stockholders of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) have previously adopted the Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. 2018 Incentive Plan, as may be amended from time to time (the “Plan”); 

 

WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan, subject to approval by the stockholders, to increase the number of authorized shares under the Plan by 1,037,250 shares of common stock of the Company;

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”), as the Plan Administrator, may at any time and from time to time amend or terminate the Plan or any outstanding Award thereunder as may be permitted by law, provided that except as otherwise expressly permitted in the Plan, the Administrator may not, without the Participant’s consent, alter the terms of an Award so as to affect materially and adversely the Participant’s rights under such Award; and

 

WHEREAS, the Committee and the Board have determined to amend the Plan in the manner set forth below, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to approval by the stockholders: 

 


	
1.
	
The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 




“Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 7(b), the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan is 2,422,901 shares of Stock plus unused Prior Plan shares of Stock.” 

 


	
2.
	
This Amendment and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof. 




 


	
3.
	
Except as amended above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




 

This First Amendment to the Plan is adopted by the Board effective as of the date of approval by shareholders at the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting.
From: <Hambrick.Amy@epamail.epa.gov>

To: Amber Allen <Amber.Allen@erg.com> Date: 12/20/2012 10:05 AM Subject: 4 of 4- FOR THE CISWI RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

MEMO TO CISWI RECONSIDERATION DOCKET:

This attachment documents a meeting between EPA and ACC, AFPA, API, and WM held on 6/19/2012.

Amy Hambrick Fuels and Incineration Group US EPA / OAQPS / Sector Policies and Programs Divis ion Phone: 919-541-0964

(See attached file:061912_Attendees.pdf)
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 20, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Ronald C. Schmeiser              |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Ronald                C. Schmeiser                  |
|                                |   | President,                Chief Executive           |
|                                |   | Officer,                and Chief Financial Officer |

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7285

JAQUAN ALEXANDER LANE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
BRENT SOUCIER , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:19

- ct

- 03200

- FL )

Submitted : Ju ly 25 , 2023 Decided: July 27, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jaquan Alexander Lane, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7285 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Jaquan Alexander L ane appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Lane’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and denying Lane’s

cross - motion for summary judgment . We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingl y, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Lane v. Soucier , No. 5:19

- ct

- 03200

- FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2022) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7285 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Cory A. TATE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D17-3562

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018

Cory A. Tate, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the October 16, 2015 judgments and sentences in Case No. 2014-CF-003479-A-O, in the Circuit *1173Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

BERGER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
June 10, 2015

Mr. Robert Mays UAV Aeronautics Investigation & Logistics 50 Lake Voyageur Drive The Woodlands, TX 77389

Dear Mr. Mays:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1739), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 774 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 774

    Recognizing the influx of known or suspected terrorists through 
      America's northern border as a threat to national security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2023

  Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Zinke) submitted the 
                          following resolution

                            October 25, 2023

             Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the influx of known or suspected terrorists through 
      America's northern border as a threat to national security.

Whereas, in fiscal year 2023, the number of known or suspected terrorists 
        encountered along our northern border within U.S. Customs and Border 
        Protection's Terrorist Screening Data Set Encounters program totaled 
        432;
Whereas, in fiscal year 2023, the number of known or suspected terrorists 
        encountered along our northern border has increased by 38 percent from 
        fiscal year 2022, and 685 percent from fiscal year 2021;
Whereas, since President Biden took office in January 2021, the number of 
        encounters along our northern border has risen from 997 monthly 
        encounters to 19,835 encounters in August 2023, a 1,889-percent 
        increase;
Whereas, since President Biden took office in January 2021, the number of 
        encounters along our northern border between ports of entry has risen 
        from 44 monthly encounters to 1,054 encounters in August 2023, a 2,295 
        percent increase;
Whereas America's northern border, the longest international border in the 
        world, measuring 5,525 miles, has only 140 ports of entry with no 
        performance measures to assess security between ports;
Whereas U.S. Border Patrol staffing on our northern border has remained stagnant 
        since fiscal year 2009; and
Whereas the Department of Homeland Security, under President Biden's and 
        Secretary Mayorkas' leadership, has failed to adequately respond to the 
        crisis at the northern border: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the border crisis along our northern border;
            (2) recognizes the influx of terrorism through our northern 
        border as a threat to national security; and
            (3) demands Secretary Mayorkas implement a plan to better 
        secure our northern border.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 3.3**

**CORRECTED**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO**

**CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

Goldcorp Holdings Co., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby files this Corrected Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation pursuant to Section 103(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, and does hereby certify:

This is a corrected Certificate of Amendment that is being filed pursuant to Section 103(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, to correct a Certificate of Amendment that was originally filed on September 27, 2010. The original Certificate of Amendment was inaccurate because it failed to include an amendment approved by directors and shareholders to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, and because it failed to include a provision for a delayed effective date.  The entire instrument in corrected form is set forth above in Paragraphs One through Fourth hereof.

**FIRST:**  The name of the corporation is Goldcorp Holdings Co.

**SECOND:**  The Board of Directors of Goldcorp Holdings Co. approved and adopted by written consent resolutions to amend the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation. The resolutions setting forth the proposed amendments are as follows:

1)  That Article First of the Certificate of Incorporation be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:  “The name of the Corporation is Goldland Holdings, Co.”

2)  That the first paragraph of Article Fourth of the Certificate of Incorporation be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 

“The total number of shares of all classes of stock, which the Corporation shall have authority to issue, is 405,000,000 shares, consisting of (i) 400,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share ("Common Stock"), and (ii) 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value per share ("Preferred Stock").”

**THIRD:** The foregoing amendments were consented to and authorized by the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote at an annual meeting of stockholders held on September 16, 2010.

**FOURTH:  **The foregoing amendments shall be effective on October 20, 2010.

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** said Goldcorp Holdings Co. has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by Pierre Quilliam, the corporation’s chief executive officer, this 5th day of October 2010.

*/s/ Pierre Quilliam*

__________________________________

Pierre Quilliam, Chief Executive Officer
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Primero
Mining Corp. (Primero) for the year ended December 31, 2017, and any
amendments thereto (the Form 20-F), I, John Morton Shannon, P.Geo., hereby
consent to the use of my name in connection with the references to and summaries
of scientific and technical information relating to Primeros mineral properties
(collectively, the Incorporated Information) and to the inclusion of the
Incorporated Information in the Annual Information Form filed as an exhibit to
the Form 20-F and incorporated by reference therein.

Yours very truly,/s/ John Morton ShannonJohn Morton Shannon, P.Geo.Dated: April 20, 2018


---
Kenneth Jerome KIRKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-347

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.