alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

((vvu make ~:hanxes to the \'alues ill the table helOII'. you 111/ISI ensure the totals update accordingly. ll 

they do no/, dick (or Tub) into und then out qfthe changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection 22.0 $0 (I 129 - ' t' .Ill \ (1 {Jit (I ttll 

(I( /J IJ(l ,. nnll 

llnr ' 11 ()I I ' ( 1 tllo 

tt ()II ~· 

' () Ill l ..., I) I Ill 

I~ f I( I .. 0.1111 ' II (II I 

II(• (I I)IJ (I fill 

0 Ill ' ill/0 II PI! 

filii {Hill '. t)l 

(l(j( " Ill I [)(II 

II rllo I II ' ll (Ill 

0.0!1 I • I ltl our 

IIIH !I IIIJ nflt 

I) {J( (I 1111 ll Oft 

II t! fll1]1 I I II 

11. •If tl IHI ,iii 

l·')t 0 (jl) n Iii) 

f)ltf (I 1)11 I I (II) 

" till o I llo ~ {1 (Ill 

'It; I flt1 'I ri!J 

The known number o f products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fl eet: $241.230 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: • . 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(include access, (@$85/hour) (e.g., Inspection, testing, and closerep lacernent) up) 

Replacement of a 126.0 I II l(o $83,060 ' I I I 

Frame Station 

Contact Boeing for 

repair if less than 

.125 inches-cannot 

II ( 

g ive cost for this --;, I (1•' ' II (II 

7 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty cost:;): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory acti ?~ 

YES* D NO rgj 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NO rgj 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.-· 

YES D NO rgj 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* D NO rgj 

*Explanation: 

8
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of Hyperera, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 18, 2011
By:
/s/ Simon BaiSimon BaiChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hyperera, Inc. and will be retained by Hyperera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,John R. Oliver, Chief Financial Officer of Action Products International, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

• the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

• the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2 

Certification of CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of THL Credit, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terrence W. Olson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| /s/     TERRENCEW. OLSON           |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:   Terrence W. Olson                    |
| Title:     Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:     March 6, 2018       |
K.A., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1078

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a)**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Gary A. Weber, certify that:

 

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.          The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.          The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

 

31
Homer WALKER, Appellant, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and the Florida Commission on Offender Review, Appellees.

No. 1D17-2199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 28, 2018

Homer Walker, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida Department of Corrections. No appearance for Appellee Florida Commission on Offender Review.

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, which was rendered March 6, 2017. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i). The clerk of the lower tribunal stamped Appellant's notice of appeal as filed April 12, 2017. This date appeared to be the presumptive filing date of the appeal. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.420(a)(2).

Because the presumptive filing date was beyond the 30-day period for seeking review, we directed Appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In response, Appellant demonstrates that the presumptive filing date of the notice of appeal is April 7, 2017, the date he placed it in the hands of an institution official for mailing. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.420(b)(2)(A). This presumptive filing date is also beyond the 30-day period for seeking review. However, in reliance on Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.070, Appellant concludes that the notice of appeal was timely filed.

Appellant's reliance on the rule is misplaced because it does not apply to the time period for filing a notice of appeal. *See**Joseph v. State* , 157 So.3d 546, 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). Because no additional time is added to the 30-day period to bring an appeal, Appellant's notice of appeal filed outside this time period is untimely and failed to invoke the Court's jurisdiction.

DISMISSED .

Wetherell, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   June 8, 2009
    
    /s/ Peter A. Edison

Peter A. Edison
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President
Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer)
 30
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Myrexis, Inc.; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |                                                                |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: July 26, 2013 | /s/    Jonathan M. Couchman                     |
|                 | Jonathan M. Couchman                                                |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer(principal accounting and financial officer) |
Exhibit 34.1



[ex3412009attestation002.gif]





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Management Committee

BMW Financial Services NA, LLC



We have examined BMW Financial Services NA, LLCs (the Company) compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for Asset-Backed Notes, BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2009- 1 (except for the servicing criteria described in the following paragraph), which the Company has determined as being applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2009 and for the period from June 9, 2009 to December 31, 2009. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria based on our examination.

The Company has determined that the servicing criteria in Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x) (A)-(C), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2009 and for the period from June 9, 2009 to December 31, 2009.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph of this report and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph.

In our opinion, BMW Financial Services NA, LLC complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of December 31, 2009 and for the period from June 9, 2009 to December 31, 2009.



/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP



Roseland, New Jersey

March 26, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 10.2(c)
 TRM AWARD AGREEMENT
 EFFECTIVE DATE:BETWEEN:
    
    TRM Corporation an Oregon corporation
    
    the CompanyAND:
    
    
    
    the Grantee
    Definitions
     41




---



##### 



Grant
   Vesting Date
    
    Percent Vested
    [ ALTERNATIVE PROVISION: Any
 42




---



##### 



cash dividends payable with respect to
the Stock subject to this Award shall be invested and reinvested in additional full or fractional shares of the Companys Common Stock and shall be
deemed to be additional Stock subject to the same restrictions and the same provisions for vesting
and forfeiture as are applicable under the terms of this Award Agreement and the Plan to the Stock
with respect to which such dividends were issued. Any dividends that are in the nature of
extraordinary dividends or that are in the form of a distribution of securities, shall be held in
escrow and shall be subject to the same restrictions and the same provisions for vesting as are
applicable to the Stock to which such dividends relate.]
 Legends
 Delivery of Shares
 Status of Stock
 43




---



##### 



Employment
 Binding Effect
 The Plan
 TRM Corporation
 ByKenneth L. TepperPresident & CEO
    
    Address:Social Security No.:
 44
p. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# ^J9$ll-E-15 8

Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:10 AM

Sheet 199 of 264P. 2 

## Jun . 12 . 1998 * 9:45A

M ^LAMINATE D PRODUCT S PE S RT P N C lo . 131 4 P

. I/IS002/00 2

From : Date : Contact : Contac tRepor t

Rober tJemison , Pacifi c Envi

f onmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Jun e 11,199 8 Mr . Scot tBarthuly , Safet

y Directo r Company : Laminate d Products , Inc . Telephon e Number : (414)658-411 4 Fa x Number : (414 ) 658415 2 Contac tSummary : Mr . Scot tBarthul y was contacte

d o n behalf

o f th e U.S . EP

A t o updat

e infonnatio n provide d i n th e 199 3 EP

A Reinforce

d Plastic Composite

s Screening Surveysubmitte d b y LarnlnatedPh>ducts , Inc . fo r mei r facilit

y locate d i n Kenosha , Wisconsin . I n respons e t o m y question s Mr . Barthul y indicate d th e following : Th e facilit

y use s polymer castin g an d atomize d spra y lay-u p (ge l coat

s only ) t o produc

e culture d marbl e product

s suc h a s bathroo

m vanit y tops . The facilit y use s atomized spra

y lay-up t o appl y severa l pigmente d ge l coat s and on e clear ge l coa ti n th e fabrication o f th e product

s liste d above . The facilit y doe s notus e toolin g ge l coat s t o manufactur

e mold s (al l mold s ar

e purchase d fro m a n outsid e supplier) . Th e pigmente d ge l coat s use d b y th e facilit

y contain betwee

n 20.0 % t o 40.0 % HA P b y weigh t(20.0 % t o 40.0 % styren e an d 0.0 % methy l methacrylate) . Th e dear ge l coa

tuse d b y th e facilit

y contain s 44.0 % HA P b y weigh t (42.0 % styrene an

d 2.0 % methy

l methacrylate) . N o additiona l HAP i s adde

d t o th e ge l coat

s durin g o r prio r to th e fabricatio

n proces s wit

h the exceptio n o f

smal l amount s o f HA Ptha tma y (o r ma y not ) b e presen ti n initiators , promoter s and/o r catalyst s adde d to th e ge l coats . Th e facilit y use s a castin

g machine t o conduc

tth e mixin g an

d polyme r castin g operation s necessar y t o produc

e th e product

s liste d above . Th

e resin , filler, pigments , an d catalys tar

e mixe d i n a mixin g tub e tha

ti s locate d insid e th e castin g machine . The castin g machine i s completel y close d durin

g the mixin g operation

. Afte r the mixin g proces s i s complete d th e resultin g mixtur e i s ejecte d fro

m th e casting machin

e int o a n empt y mold (o r molds) . The to p o f th e mold s use d b y th e facilit y ar c completel y open . Th e polyeste r resi n use d by th e facilit y fo r it s polyme r castin g operations contain s 40.0 % HAPb y weigh ta s supplie d (40.0 % styrene) an

d does notcontain a vapor suppressan tN o additiona

l HA P i a adde

d to the polyeste r resi

n durin g o r prio r t o th e polymer castin g proces s wit h th e exceptio n o f smal l amount

s o f HA Ptha tma y (o rma y not ) b a presen tir \ initiators , promoter

s and/o r catalyst

s added t o th e resin . INFORMATIO N I S ACCURAT E
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with this amended Annual Report of WLMG Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eugene Whitmire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.Such amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in such amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of WLMG Holdings, Inc.
 
 Date: April 7, 2010
  /s/ Eugene Whitmire
 Eugene Whitmire
 Principal Financial Officer,
 Director, Chief Financial Officer,
 Secretary and Treasurer
|   | 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      September 13, 2010 | /s/ Guy Brusciano                                  |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Guy      Brusciano, President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer |
|                           | and      Director                                  |
|                           | (Principal      Financial Officer)                 |

----
Jorge L. PEREZ-DIAZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1846

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Ronald S. Kaplan, Chief Executive Officer of Action ProductsInternational, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

•     the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the nine month period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

•     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.