alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daleco Resources Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephan
V. Benediktson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                                  /s/  Stephan V. Benediktson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Stephan V. Benediktson
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                August 14, 2006
ESTATE OF Janice GOODBREAD, BY AND THROUGH Debra L. BAUGH, Personal Representative, Appellant, v. NORTHPORT HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, L.L.C. and NHS Management, L.L.C. (as to Crystal River Health and Rehabilitation Center), Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2804

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 6, 2018

Megan L. Gisclar and Joanna Greber Detloff, of Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Dale R. Sisco and Kristi Neher Davisson, of Sisco-Law, Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order compelling arbitration in all respects.1*See**Northport Health Servs. of Fla., L.L.C. v. Louis* , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D505, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 1122117 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 2, 2018).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., and EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

1

Appellees did not cross-appeal the trial court's determination that the arbitration agreement provision requiring the application of Alabama law on discovery was invalid.
S.M., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4260

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on OIF/OEF Veterans and Families will meet on April 15-16, 2009, at the St. Regis Hotel, 923 16th Street, NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the full spectrum of health care, benefits delivery and related family support issues that confront servicemembers during their transition from active duty to veteran status and during their post-service years. The Committee focuses on the concerns of all men and women with active military service in Operation Iraqi Freedom and/or Operation Enduring Freedom, but pays particular attention to severely disabled veterans and their families.

The agenda for April 15 and 16 will feature a review of information gathered by the Committee during the past two years. The Committee will also discuss the possibility of transferring records and sharing the results of its various fact-finding initiatives with other VA advisory committees which have complementary jurisdictions and similar areas of interest.

The public may submit written statements for the Committee's review to the Advisory Committee on OIF/OEF Veterans and Families (008), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Any member of the public seeking additional information should contact Laura O'Shea, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 461-5765.

Dated: March 31, 2009.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-7456 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF SILVERHILL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silverhill Management Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, the undersigned, Robert Steele, Chief Financial Officer of Silverhill Management Services, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Silverhill Management Services, Inc.  Date:  March 31, 2011/s/ Robert SteeleRobert SteeleChief Financial Officer (and principal accounting officer)
Jaime MCDONOUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106667

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: March 5, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Garrick F. Daplin, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Jaime McDonough ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. The findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
D.K.M. v. STATE

CR-15-0229

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016 Reh. denied December 2, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gregory Earl MURPHY, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Joseph M. SHELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         351,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  291,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    255,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               898,663
<PP&E>                                      18,916,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,814,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,578,135
<BONDS>                                      3,194,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,319,145
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,276,520)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,814,907
<SALES>                                      2,188,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,188,217
<CGS>                                        2,079,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,079,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               702,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             178,173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (771,531)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (771,531)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.20)


</TABLE>
Arturo ALEMAN-DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-810

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
David ZUCKER and Carrie Zucker, Appellants, v. Miguel R. GONZALEZ and GEICO General Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 3D16-1323

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 4.33







September 5, 2013



Ric Saalwachter

Managing Director

C&Co/PrinceRidge LLC

600 Travis Street, Suite 6950

Houston, TX 77002



RE: Engagement Agreement Dated June 1,
2012 (as amended November 14/12 and January 23/13)



Dear Mr. Saalwachter:



Pursuant to Section 4 of the above mentioned
agreement and amendments thereto, kindly accept this correspondence as Notice of Termination of the agreement. This is primarily
due to the long standing period of inactivity. Accordingly it is our understanding and belief that the termination will be effective
on or about September 10, 2013 being the expiration of the 5 may period following this written notice.



|We do appreciate the opportunity.            | 
|-------------------------------------------- | 
|                                             | 
|Let me know if you require anything further. | 
|                                             | 
|Thanking you,                                | 
|                                             | 
|Eagleford Energy Inc.                        | 
|                                             | 
|/s/ James Cassina                            | 
|                                             | 
|J.C. Cassina, President                      |
Tony HOPKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-281

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Terry WEAVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3371

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, James E. Hogue, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of
Wiltex A, Inc., (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. the accompanying Form 10QSB report for the period ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.


                                      By:  s/s JAMES E. HOGUE
                                      -----------------------
                                      James E. Hogue
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: November 13, 2002
Cederick JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2239

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 03/73-0239]

Notice is hereby given that Core Capital Partners II-S, L.P., 1717 K Street NW, Suite 920, Washington, DC 20006, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Core Capital Partners II-S, L.P. proposes to manage assets it sold to a third-party acquirer and held in a newly formed Special Purpose Vehicle (“SPV”) as the General Partner of SPV.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a) and (e) of the Regulations because SPV, an Associate of Core Capital Partners II-S, L.P., owns more than ten percent of the same assets held by Core Capital Partners II-S, LP, and therefore this transaction is considered a financing in which an Associate is used to manage Portfolio Concerns.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction, within fifteen days of the date of this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: December 13, 2017.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2017-28384 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
AlabamaDepartmentofEnvironmentalManagementadem.alabama.gov1400ColiseumBlvd.36110-2400PostOfficeBox301463December14,2010Montgomery,Alabama36130-1463(334)271-7700FAX(334)271-7950CERTIFIEDMAILNO.:9171082133393658178218Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes FlemingRegionalAdministratorEPARegion4AtlantaFederalCenter61ForsythStreet,S.W.Atlanta,GA30303-8960DearMs.Fleming:TheAlabamaDepartmentofEnvironmentalManagement formally submitsforyour approval.finalrevisionsto theDepartment'sregulations.Theseregulationswerethesubjectof apublichearingheld onOctober6,2010,andwereadoptedbytheEnvironmental ManagementCommissiononDecember10,2010.Theeffective dateoftheseregulationsisJanuary18.2011.ADEMadopted revisions toADEMAdmin. Coder.335-3-14-.04tobeconsistentwithEPA'sgreenhouse gas(GHG)tailoringrule.Thisrevision includes additionalthresholds of100.000tonsperyearofGHGsfor majorsource applicabilityand 75,000 tonsperyearofGtIGsa5asignificancethreshold,basedon carbon dioxide equivalentemissions.Chapter335-3-14isconsideredpartofthefederallyenforceable SIP.Revisions to this Chapterareproposedtobe incorporated intoAlabama's SIP.Weunderstand EPAisparallelprocessing federal approvaloftheserule revisionsand werequestthatEPAfinalizethisprocessassoonaspossible.If'youneedadditional information concerning thissubmittal,pleasecallChris Howardofni)staffat(334)27!-7878.Sincerely,~onkldW.Gore, ChiefAirDivisicncc:RichardA.SchuttCERTIFIEDMAIL NO.:917108 2133 393658178201DouglasNeeleyCERTIFIED MAILNO.:91 71082133 393658178195BirminghamBranch110VulcanRoadBeverlyBanisterCERTIFIEDMAILNO.:917108213339365817818File:P-8-14LrBranch.;-t-*kfwleBranchMoW~l2715SandlmRoad,SW*t2204PerimeterRoad4171CommandersDrweB~rmtngham,AL35209-4702DecaturAL35603 1333cMobtle,AL366151131Mobtle,AL366151421(205)942-6168(256)3531713%45r'x<"(251) 4503400(251)4326533(205)9411603(FAX)(256)340-9359(FAX)(251)4792593(FAX)(251) 432-6598(FAX)
```

[Federal Register: January 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 7)]
[Notices]               
[Page 1608]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12ja10-46]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to the 
provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, 5 
U.S.C. 552b.

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 1 p.m., January 14, 2010.

Place: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 
Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000).

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: Issuance of a proposed rule on energy 
position limits and hedge exemptions on regulated futures exchanges, 
derivatives transaction execution facilities and electronic trading 
facilities.

Contact Person for More Information: David A. Stawick, Secretary of the 
Commission, 202-418-5071.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-450 Filed 1-8-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 10, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22

- 1692 Lower Tribunal No. 21

- 6

________________


### James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith ,

Appellant s ,
vs. 

### Pedro J. Garcia, etc., et al. ,

Appellee s

. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr. , Judge. Mark A. Goldstein , for appellant s

. Geraldine Bonzon

- Keenan, Miami

- Dade County Attorney, and Ryan Carlin, Assistant County Attorney , for appell ee Pedro J. Garcia, as Property Appraiser of Miami

- Dade County.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOBREE , JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Jones v. Flowers , 547 U.S. 220, 226 (2006) (“Due2

process does not require that a property owner receive actual notice before the go vernment may take his property.”); Miles v. Parrish , 199 So. 3d 1046, 1049 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2016) (“There is no requirement that the property appraiser give the property owner actual notice of the tax lien . . .

. ” ) (quoting Genesis Ministries, Inc. v. Brown , 186 So. 3d 1074, 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)).
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40345

Summary Calendar

Esaw Lampkin, 

Petitioner—Appellant,

versus

Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 

Correctional Institutions Division, 

Respondent—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:16-CV-1028

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Esaw Lampkin, Texas prisoner # 1912325, filed a notice of appeal 

following the district court’s dismissal of his motion for injunctive relief, filed 

three years after the denial of his original 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 13, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-40345 Document: 00516052809 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/13/2021
No. 20-40345

2

He also urges this court to order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice 

to give him access to his trial record. 

In his opening and reply briefs, Lampkin asserts that he is entitled to 

federal habeas relief. He does not address the district court’s denial of his

motion for injunctive relief.

Lampkin’s failure to adequately brief any challenge to the district 

court’s denial of injunctive relief is the same as if he had not appealed the 

district court’s decision at all. Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 

813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (holding an appellant abandons a claim on 

appeal when he fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis).

Further, we would lack jurisdiction to consider a third, untimely appeal of the 

denial of habeas relief. Lampkin’s appeal is frivolous. 

AFFIRM; MOTION DENIED.

Case: 20-40345 Document: 00516052809 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/13/2021
1 

### Schaffner, Karen S.

From: Bogany, Carolyn [Carolyn.Bogany@tpcgrp.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 12:12 PM To: Schaffner, Karen S. Cc: Textor, Marise L.; Shedd.Steve@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Follow-up - TK-101



### Karen, this is in reference to the February 1 st 

### e-mail. Based on TPC’s facility drawings ,TK-101 is a highpressure condensate tank. Therefore, it is not subject to a MACT.



### Carolyn Coates Bogany Senior Environmental Engineer - HNO Carolyn.Bogany@tpcgrp.com TPC Group | www.tpcgrp.com Office: 713.475.7474 | Cell: 832.331.0572 | Fax: 713-475-7463 8600 Park Place Blvd | Houston, Texas 77017