alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc.
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 12, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Ronald C. LundyRonald C. LundyVice President of Finance and CFO
EXHIBIT  10.1

     On  October  18,  2005 the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
revised  the  employment  agreements ("Agreements") for Gregory S. Wilson, Chief
Financial  Officer,  and  Kirk  L.  Somers,  Vice President, Investor Relations,
General  Counsel  and  Secretary,  which  have  previously  been  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  Under the Agreements, if Mr. Wilson and Mr.
Somers  were  entitled  to  severance compensation, they would have received six
months  of  severance compensation.  Under the revised Agreements, if Mr. Wilson
and Mr. Somers are eligible for severance compensation, they will receive twelve
months  of  severance  compensation.  The  Compensation  Committee  amended  the
Agreements  to  provide  for  consistent severance rights of executive officers.
Isaac J. MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0388

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Carlton Parfitt, Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Energy Corporation Ltd. a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 of Avalon Energy Corporation;



2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14 and 15d - 14) for the registrant and we have:



a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within June 30, 2005 prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.      All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 12, 2006



/s/ Carlton Parfitt

--------------

Carlton Parfitt

Director and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-21292 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VALENTINE CHAVEZ-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-311-1

-------------------- Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

Valentine Chavez-Vasquez (“Chavez”) appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea for illegal re-entry into the United States following deportation. Chavez appeals the district court’s imposition of a $500 fine, arguing that the district court erred reversibly by imposing a fine based on his ability to earn money while in prison. Chavez argues that 28 C.F.R. § 345.35(a) prohibits deportable aliens from placement inNo. 02-21292 -2- Federal Prison Industries (“FPI”) jobs. Chavez also contends that U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional based on Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

Chavez did not raise below the issue of inability to work in prison, so we will review it for plain error only. Because Chavez does not argue and has not demonstrated that he is “currently under an order of deportation, exclusion, or removal,” he has not shown that he in ineligible for an FPI job assignment under 28 C.F.R. § 345.35(a). The district court’s determination that Chavez has the future ability to pay the fine through prison earnings is not clearly, much less plainly, erroneous.

Chavez’ contention that the enhancement provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional lacks merit because Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 24 (1998). See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). For the foregoing reasons, Chavez’ sentence is AFFIRMED.
---

|EXHIBIT 99.7                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION                                
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Blaiklock, Chief Financial Officer of Primero Mining
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F/A of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                   

| | By:    | /s/ David Blaiklock    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | David Blaiklock        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | November 7, 2012       

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2043

W. SHEROD WILLIAMS, Ph.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (1:05-cv-02216-WMN)

Submitted: July 9, 2007 Decided: December 7, 2007

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ari Taragin, Michael J. Snider, SNIDER & ASSOCIATES, LLC,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United

States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

W. Sherod Williams filed an employment discrimination

action against the Department of Veterans Affairs (“Defendant”),

asserting that he was subjected to a hostile work environment based

upon race and retaliation and that Defendant retaliated against

him. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,

for summary judgment. The district court granted Defendant’s

motion to dismiss and dismissed the action. “We review de novo a

district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).” Sec’y of State for

Def. v. Trimble Navigation Ltd., 484 F.3d 700, 705 (4th Cir. 2007).

“[W]hen ruling on a defendant’s motion to dismiss, a judge must

accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the

complaint.” Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007)

(citations omitted). To survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, “[f]actual

allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the

speculative level” and have “enough facts to state a claim to

relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly,

127 S. Ct. 1955, 1965, 1974 (2007). 

With these standards in mind, we have reviewed the record

on appeal and conclude that the district court erred in dismissing

Williams’ complaint for failure to state a claim. See Baqir v.

Principi, 434 F.3d 733, 745-47 (4th Cir.) (discussing elements of

hostile work environment and retaliation claims), cert. denied, 127
- 3 -

S. Ct. 659 (2006). Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s

order and remand for further proceedings. We express no view on

the ultimate disposition of Williams’ claims. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
STATE EX REL. Theoshamond NORMAN v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1649

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Norman v. State, 16-2040 (La.__/__/__).
****EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Pimi Agro CleanTech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Youval Saly, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
       April 12, 2011By:/s/ Youval Saly   Youval Saly   Chief Executive Officer     
 

 

42**
Second Amendment to the RARE Hospitality  Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 4.8 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 This Second Amendment to the RARE Hospitality International, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is
adopted by the Retirement Plan Committee (the “Committee”), to be effective as of January 1, 2006 (the “Effective Date”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, RARE Hospitality International, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the
Plan for the benefit of certain key management and highly compensated employees of the Company and its affiliates that participate in the Plan, and certain non-employee directors of the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan provides that the Committee, as the Plan administrator, may approve amendments to the Plan,
other than amendments affecting vesting or company contribution rates; and 
 WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend
the Plan, for plan years beginning on and after the Effective Date, to eliminate any percentage limitation on the maximum amount of deferral contributions that a participant is permitted to contribute to the Plan each year; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended, as of the Effective Date, to read as follows: 
 1. Section 3.2(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: 

(c) Application and Amount. A Participant may elect to have his Deferral Election apply to one of the following
categories of payments of Compensation: (1) Base Salary only; (2) Bonuses only; or (3) all payments of Compensation. A Participant may elect to defer his Base Salary, Bonuses or Compensation in 1% increments up to a maximum of 100%,
but in no event may Deferral Contributions made for any Plan Year on behalf of a Participant other than a Nonemployee Director exceed $50,000. The maximum dollar amount described in the preceding sentence may be changed by the Retirement Plan
Committee, in its discretion, from time-to-time. 
 2. Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2018

No. 04-18-00070-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.C., A CHILD,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA00971

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. The appellant’s brief is currently due to be filed on March 14, 2018. On March 9, 2018, 

appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief.

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the 

Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is 

required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is 

filed. Id. 

The motion is GRANTED, and appellant’s brief must be filed no later than April 3, 2018. 

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the use, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2011 of CTM Media Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), of our report dated October 27, 2011 on our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of July 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each year in the two-year period ended July 31, 2011, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ Zwick & Banyai, PLLCZwick & Banyai, PLLC Southfield, MichiganDecember 5, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

                            MAXUS REALTY TRUST, INC.

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Maxus  Realty  Trust,  Inc.  (the
"Trust") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John W.
Alvey,  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial and  Accounting  Officer of the Trust
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Trust as of March 31, 2004 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).


/s/ John W. Alvey
------------------------
John W. Alvey
Vice President
Chief Financial & Accounting Officer
May 11, 2004
Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. 10-K/A







Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXELY ACT OF 2002



I,
Walter Michalec, certify that:



| | 1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the report on Form 10-K of Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge,
    this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
    covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:
    October 8, 2020 | By: | /s/
    Walter Michalec                                                                                                      
|-------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |     | Walter Michalec                                                                                                              
|                           |     | Interim
        Chief Financial Officer
        (Duly Authorized
        Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41257

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO CARRACCIOLI-AGUILERA,

also known as Francisco Ortiz-Aguilera

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-98-CR-216-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 25, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco

Carraccioli-Aguilera has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Carraccioli has filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and

Carraccioli’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.