alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11694 and  #11695]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of North Dakota (FEMA-1829-DR), dated 03/24/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe storms and flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         03/13/2009 and continuing. *Effective Date:*
                         03/24/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/26/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/24/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/24/2009, private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Adams, Barnes, Benson, Billings, Burleigh, Cass, Cavalier, Dickey, Dunn, Emmons, Foster, Grand Forks, Grant, Hettinger, Kidder, Lamoure, Logan, Mcintosh, Mckenzie, Mclean, Mercer, Morton, Nelson, Oliver, Pembina, Ramsey, Ransom, Richland, Sargent, Sioux, Stark, Stutsman, Walsh, Williams, and the Standing Rock and Spirit Lake Indian Reservations. The Interest Rates are: Percent*Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.500*Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 116946 and for economic injury is 116956. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Jane M. Pease, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-7462 Filed 4-2-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-4700

CORWIN TYRELL WOODSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-94-79)

Submitted: September 11, 1997

Decided: September 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON,

Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Gary R. Hershner, MORRISSEY, HERSHNER & JACOBS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, M. Hannah Lauck, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Corwin Tyrell Woodson was convicted of drug, money laundering,

and firearm offenses, including using or carrying a firearm during and

in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(c) (1994). He was sentenced to a term of 240 months imprisonment. On appeal, we vacated Woodson's § 924(c) conviction under

Bailey v. United States, ___ U.S. #6D6D 6D#, 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec.

6, 1995) (Nos. 94-7448/7492), and remanded for resentencing. See

United States v. Sedgwick, Nos. 95-5417/5418/5428/5461 (4th Cir.

May 29, 1996) (unpublished), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 65

U.S.L.W. 3265 (U.S. Oct. 6, 1997) (No. 96-5768).

The district court then resentenced Woodson on the remaining

counts, adding an enhancement for possession of a firearm during a

drug offense. United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines

Manual, § 2D1.1(b)(1) (Nov. 1995). The district court overruled

Woodson's objection to the enhancement and sentenced him to a term

of 240 months imprisonment. Woodson appeals, alleging that the

enhancement violated his rights under the Double Jeopardy and Due

Process Clauses. Finding no error, we affirm.

We recently decided the issue raised here in United States v.

Hillary, 106 F.3d 1170, 1171-73 (4th Cir. 1997), holding that the district court has jurisdiction to resentence a defendant on a surviving

drug conviction after he has been granted relief from a § 924(c) conviction in light of Bailey. See also United States v. Hawthorne, 94

F.3d 118, 122 (4th Cir. 1996) (when a § 924(c) conviction is overturned under Bailey, the district court may consider § 2D1.1 enhancement on remand, so long as the government agrees to forego

reprosecution of the § 924(c) count). Because this case is governed by

Hillary and Hawthorne, Woodson's contentions are without merit.

 2
We therefore affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

 3
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61767-61768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PHS 2018-1 Topic 55: Adjuvant 
Development for Viral Diseases Vaccines.
    Date: January 26, 2018.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dharmendar Rathore, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Room 3G30, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 
Fishers Lane, Drive, MSC 9823, Bethesda, MD 20892-9823, 240-669-
5058, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d6f7c6975726f78795d707c747133737475337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9eecffeaf6f1ecfbfadef3fff7f2b0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


[[Page 61768]]


    Dated: December 22, 2017.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-28156 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Synthetech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Form 10-Q), I, M. Sreenivasan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ M. SREENIVASANM. SreenivasanPresident & C.E.O.August 3, 2004
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
ERNIE MORRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. CONTRAX FURNISHINGS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, d/b/a Meteor Education, and Greg S. Cave, an Individual, Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D17-0297

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 3.1





Amendment to the


Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement


of RICI® Linked - PAM Advisors Fund, LLC




This Amendment, dated as of December 14, 2009 (the “Amendment”), amends Section 12 of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated as of October 31, 2007 (the “Agreement”) of RICI® Linked - PAM Advisors Fund, LLC (the “Company”).




Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.




WHEREAS, Section 14 of the Agreement provides that Price Asset Management, Inc., the managing member of the Company (the “Managing Member”), may amend the Agreement without the consent of the Members under certain circumstances, including, by way of example and not limitation, to add to the representations, duties or obligations of the Managing Member or surrender any right or power of the Managing Member for the benefit of the Members.




NOW THEREFORE, the Managing Member hereby amends the Agreement as follows:




1. The fourth paragraph of Section 12 of the Agreement, beginning with the words “The Members of a Series shall have no right,” is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




“The Managing Member may be removed as managing member of a Series upon an affirmative vote of Members owning Units of such Series with an aggregate Net Asset Value exceeding 50% of the aggregate Net Asset Value of all Units of such Series then held by Members.  The Managing Member may be removed as managing member of the Company upon an affirmative vote of Members owning Units of each Series with an aggregate Net Asset Value exceeding 50% of the aggregate Net Asset Value of all Units of each such Series then held by Members. For purposes of the preceding two sentences, Units owned by the Managing Member, its affiliates and their respective officers and employees shall be disregarded. Following a vote to remove the Managing Member as managing member of a Series, the Members of such Series may elect a replacement managing member by the affirmative vote of Members owning Units of such Series with an aggregate Net Asset Value exceeding 50% of the aggregate Net Asset Value of all Units of such Series then held by Members.  Following a vote to remove the Managing Member as managing member of the Company, the Members may elect a replacement managing member as provided in Section 4(b). If removed pursuant hereto, the Managing Member shall be entitled to receive its Management Fee accrued through the date of such removal (pro-rated for partial periods).”




2. Other than as amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect as of its date.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.







MANAGING MEMBER:




PRICE ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.




By:      /s/Walter Thomas Price III


Name: Walter Thomas Price III


Title:    President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYRONE ARMSTRONG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 457 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Exhibit 10.11(d)
 AMENDED AND RESTATED  REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
 Agreement Original Agreement Company Buyer
 RECITALS
 Original Loan Agreement Original Warrants Loan Agreement New Warrants Warrants Warrant
Shares
   Definitions.
 Commission
 Demand Registration
 Exchange Act
 Other Holder
 Other Securities




---



##### 



Person
 Piggyback Registration
 Registrable Shares
 Registration Expenses
 Securities Act
 Shelf Registration Statement
 Demand Registration.
 Requests for Registration




---



##### 



Demand Registration
  Priority on Demand Registrations Other Securities Other Holder pro rata
 Restrictions on Registrations
 Piggyback Registrations.
 Right to Piggyback Piggyback Registration
 Priority on Primary Registrations




---



##### 



first second pro rata
 Priority on Secondary Registrations
 Registration Procedures




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



Registration Expenses
 Registration Expenses
   Indemnification




---



##### 








---



##### 



Compliance with Rule 144




---



##### 



Form S-3 Registrations
  provided however
  Participation in Underwritten Registrations
 Amendments and Waivers




---



##### 



Successors and Assigns
 Final Agreement
 Limit on Future Registration Rights
  Severability
 Descriptive Heading
 Notices




---



##### 



17. GOVERNING LAW. THE VALIDITY, MEANING AND EFFECT OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS MADE AND TO BE PERFORMED
IN THAT STATE.
 Counterparts
 Injunctive Relief
   TRM CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Richard B. SternName:
    Richard B. SternTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer & PresidentLC CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD.By:
    /s Richard F. ConwayName:
    Richard F. ConwayTitle:
    Director
CONTACT REPORT 

Person Calling: Keith Barnett 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OAQPS/ESD/OCG 

919-541-5605 

Person Called: Hector Ybanez 

Holcim Cement 

913-319-6065 

Date of Contact: July 20, 2010 

Contact Summary: Discussion of variability calculations. Hector stated that the autocorrelation 

correction doesn’t change the number (UPL) a lot. It does make a big difference of you take the 

average of the variance. A pooled variance gives similar answers to proportional variance. 

 

______________________________________________________________________________
----

| Date:  | November                9, 2006 |   |                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |                            | By:    | /s/                John W. Alvey                  |
|   |                            |   | John                W. Alvey                      |
|   |                            |   | Vice                President and Chief Financial |
|   |                            |   | and                Accounting Officer of          |
|   |                            |   | Maxus                Realty Trust, Inc.           |
Docket No: FAA- 2014 - 1049 Dir ID: 2013 - NM - 110 -AD

. **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response TCCA Gordanko Jeremic 6/6/2013 TCCA contact, assisted with Bombardier information Bom bardier Chester Liburski 6/13/13 Answered questions regarding Cost and Man Hours
Kari L. ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-802

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton 

ROCHELLE SUSAN BEARDSLEE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 3025-95-2 PER CURIAM 

 JULY 15, 1997 

WILLIAM CLARY, ET AL. 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF 

THE CITY OF RICHMOND 

Melvin R. Hughes, Jr., Judge 

 (Rochelle Susan Beardslee, pro se, on 

brief). 

 No brief for appellees. 

 Rochelle Susan Beardslee appeals the decision of the circuit 

court denying her motion to vacate the order of November 15, 

1993. Beardslee contends that the 1993 order was void. Upon 

reviewing the record and opening brief, we conclude that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the 

decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. 

 Beardslee contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction 

to issue the temporary removal order of November 15, 1993 because 

she had not been given notice. The record demonstrates that the 

parties, with counsel, were present in court. The child's father 

presented the testimony of the Henrico Child Protective Services 

to support the allegations of sexual abuse by Beardslee. The 

agency had conducted a preliminary investigation which resulted 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

in a finding of "reason to suspect" sexual abuse. 

 Under Code § 16.1-252, the court may issue a preliminary 

removal order "after a hearing wherein the court finds that 

reasonable efforts have been made to prevent removal of the child 

from his home." Twenty-four hour notice of the hearing is 

required, unless notice "cannot be given despite diligent efforts 

to do so." Code § 16.1-252(B). If notice is not given, "the 

parents . . . shall be afforded a later hearing on their motion 

regarding a continuation of the summary removal order." 

 The record demonstrates that the parties and their 

respective counsel were present in court. The matter was ongoing 

in the circuit court and the parties were properly before it. 

Therefore, Beardslee has failed to demonstrate that the court did 

not have jurisdiction or that its order was void. 

 It is not clear from the record whether the necessary notice 

was given prior to the hearing. However, the statute provides 

for an additional hearing in instances where notice was 

insufficient. See Code § 16.1-252(B). Here, Beardslee elected 

not to exercise her rights under the statute. She did not 

challenge the circuit court's factual findings or appeal its 

order, which became final twenty-one days after entry. See Rule 

1:1. Instead, she absconded with the child. 

 Beardslee has failed to demonstrate error on the part of the 

circuit court in denying her motion to vacate the November 15, 

1993 order. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is 
 3 

summarily affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 912 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 912

                Censuring Representative Jamaal Bowman.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2023

Mrs. McClain (for herself, Mr. Gimenez, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Finstad, Ms. 
  Greene of Georgia, Mr. Walberg, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. 
   Bergman, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, and Mr. Collins) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                Censuring Representative Jamaal Bowman.

Whereas, on September 30, 2023, as the House of Representatives was considering 
        legislation to avoid a lapse of appropriations for Federal agencies and 
        departments which would result in a shutdown of those agencies and 
        departments, Jamaal Bowman, the Representative from the 16th 
        Congressional District of New York, pulled a fire alarm;
Whereas section 22-1319 of the District of Columbia Criminal Code makes 
        knowingly causing a false alarm of fire a misdemeanor punishable by fine 
        or imprisonment up to six months, or both;
Whereas section 22-1319 of the District of Columbia Criminal Code states ``It 
        shall be unlawful for any person or persons to willfully or knowingly 
        give a false alarm of fire within the District of Columbia, and any 
        person or persons violating the provisions of this subsection shall, 
        upon conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and be punished by a 
        fine not more than the amount set forth in section 22-3571.01 [of this 
        Code] or by imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or by both such 
        fine and imprisonment'';
Whereas, on October 26, 2023, Representative Bowman pled guilty to violating 
        section 22-1319 of the District of Columbia Criminal Code and was 
        required to pay a $1,000 fine and write an apology letter to the United 
        States Capitol Police and was placed on probation; and
Whereas the actions of Representative Bowman forced the evacuation of the Cannon 
        House Office Building and disrupted the work of the Congress as a vote 
        was underway on the floor of the House: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the House of Representatives censures Jamaal Bowman, 
        Representative from the 16th Congressional District of New 
        York;
            (2) Representative Jamaal Bowman will forthwith present 
        himself in the well of the House of Representatives for the 
        pronouncement of censure; and
            (3) Representative Jamaal Bowman will be censured with the 
        public reading of this resolution by the Speaker.
                                 <all>
```