alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION




The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and as the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of CompuCredit Holdings Corporation, certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CompuCredit Holdings Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.




This 3rd day of March 2011.





/s/ DAVID G. HANNADavid G. HannaChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board/s/ J.PAUL WHITEHEAD, IIIJ.Paul Whitehead, IIIChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CompuCredit Holdings Corporation and will be retained by CompuCredit Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Bavarian Higher Administrative Court) by order of that court of 19 April 2005 in Bund Naturschutz in Bayern e.V. v Freistaat Bayern

(Case C-244/05)

(2005/C 205/16)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Bavarian Higher Administrative Court) of 19 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 19 April 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Bund Naturschutz in Bayern e.V. and Freistaat Bayern on the following question:

----

(1)OJ. 1992 L 206, p . 7

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,424]


Vintage Verandah International Kalispell, MT; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 27, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Vintage Verandah International, Kalispell, Montana.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6533 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
## COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON K. PULLIAM

JUSTICES FOURTH COURT OF APPE ALS DISTRICT

CADENA

- REEVES JUSTICE CENTE R

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8205

- 3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4TH COA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335

- 2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335

- 2762

January 22, 2015

Jorge Vela

Druker Law Firm

1618 Chihuahua

Laredo, Texas 78043

Uriel Druker

Druker Law Firm

1618 Chihuahua

Laredo, Texas 78043 John F. Davis

Law Office of John F. Davis

6655 First Park Ten Blvd., Suite 250

San Antonio, Texas 78213

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04

- 14

- 00016

- CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2010CVT001822D3

Style: John F. Davis v . Farias Enterprises LTD.

Dear Counsel,

Please be advised the panel in this case has changed. The original panel was Chief

Justice Stone, Justice Angelini, and Justice Martinez. Your updated panel consists of Justice

Angelini, Justice Martinez, and Justice Pulliam. Your submission date remains the same.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to

contact me.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

_____________________________ Margaret E. Adams

Legal Assistant, Fourth Court of Appeals

210.335.3854
M.D.F., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2965

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 9, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of 5BARz International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Bland, as principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Daniel Bland


Daniel Bland


Chief Executive Officer


March 31, 2011








/s/ Daniel Bland


Daniel Bland


Chief Financial Officer


March 31, 2011





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 5BARz International, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John Luft, certify that:

 

1.                    Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Carroll ShelbyInternational Inc.;

 

2.                    Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.                    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.                    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)                        designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)                       evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)                        presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.                    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)                        all significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

b)                       any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.                    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date: November 15, 2004 |   | /s/  JOHN LUFT           |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | President, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
James Willis MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1915

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Chester DOMINGUE v. LOUISIANA GUEST HOUSE, LLC, d/b/a Camelot of Broussard

NO. 2018-C-0014

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

Denied.
Xaviar Deshant WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-823

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 127787 & (90) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 127787 COA: 245895 Macomb CC: 01-001624-FC DAVID STADLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 18, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be revie wed by this Court. The
miscellaneous motion is GRANTED.

p0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
The LATHAN COMPANY, INC. v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Recovery School District & John White in his official capacity as the State of Louisiana Superintendent of Education

Guarantee Company of North America v. State of Louisiana, Department of Education, Recovery School District

NO. 2018-C-0026

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
Janice Loden SULLIVAN v. James Wayne SULLIVAN

2015-CT-01513-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: November 20, 2017 Closed: February 1, 2018

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
---

CONSENT

March 31, 2014

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Primero Mining Corp. (the
      "Registrant") | 
|--- | --------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                    | 
|    | Consent of Expert                             | 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the "Annual Report").
The Annual Report incorporates by reference the Annual Information Form of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the AIF).

Tetra Tech WEI Inc. (Tetra Tech) hereby consents to
the use of its name in the Annual Report with reference to its involvement in
the preparation of the following technical report (the "Technical
Report") referred to in the AIF:

- Technical Report entitled Brigus Gold Corp. - Black Fox Project, National
  Instrument 43-101 Technical Report dated effective January 6, 2011 prepared
  by Wardrop Engineering Inc.

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Sincerely,

|Per:                 | /s/
      Philip Bridson | 
|-------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|Tetra Tech WEI Inc.  |                         
|Authorized Signatory |                         
|Name:                | Philip Bridson, P.Eng.   | 
|Title:               | Sr. Mining Engineer      | 

---
Rolando DELLANO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-958

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 6, 2008, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 14, 2008, (73 FR 60719), Hospira Inc., 1776 North 
Centennial Drive, McPherson, Kansas 67460-1247, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as an importer of Remifentanil (9739), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import Remifentanil for use in dosage form 
manufacturing.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of Hospira, Inc. to import the basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United 
States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated 
Hospira, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent 
with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and 
testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the 
company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the 
company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 
952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above 
named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class 
of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: January 9, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-732 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Amy Denise GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1669

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 1, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to February 5, 2019)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-18-012 Mumin v. Banks

A-18-223 State v. Pugmire

A-18-560 In re Interest of Ivanna E.

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Silver Falcon Mining, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:



1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2011 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Pierre Quilliam



Pierre Quilliam,

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)



Date:  May 2, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her capacity as an officer of ChineseInvestors.COM (the "Company"), that, to his or her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated: August 29, 2011





/s/  Warren Wang





President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)








Dated: August 29, 2011





/s/ Brett Roper





Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)
Richard GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4365

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Peter Joseph ROSATO, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1087

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Derrick A. COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1128

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the XXXIIIrd Report on Competition Policy — 2003

(SEC(2004) 658 final)

(2005/C 221/01)

On 4 June 2004, the European Commission decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the XXXIIIrd Report on Competition Policy — 2003

The Section for the Single Market, Production and Consumption, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 11 January 2005. The rapporteur was Mr Chiriaco.

At its 414th plenary session, held on 9 and 10 February 2005 (meeting of 9 February), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion with 75 votes in favour and one abstention:

1.   Introduction

2.   Application of antitrust rules — Treaty Articles 81 and 82

3.   Competition policy developments at sectoral level

4.   Reform of the merger control system

5.   International cooperation

6.   State aid

7.   General assessment

7.2   Relationship between competition policy and economic growth policy

7.3   State aid and services of general interest

7.4   Liberal professions

7.5   Plurality of information and competition law

Brussels, 9 February 2005.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)OJ C 80 of 30.3.2004

(2)OJ C 117 of 30.4.2004

(3)  Council Regulation 139/2004, of 20.1.2004

(4)OJ C 157 of 28.6.2005.

(5)OJ C 302 of 7.12.2004

(6)  COM(2004) 83 final of 9.2.2004

----
Questions from Maine for call on September 8, 2014

 In the TSD list of generating assets we see where industrial co-generation facilities are 

exempted. Could you point us to where that exemption is in the proposed regulation? --

Christian

 RGGI considers biomass renewable, does the EPA proposal? Is a >250 MMbtu/hr biomass facility 

that burns <10% fossil fuel exempt from 111d? – Christian

 EPA has determined a 25 % renewable energy goal for the State of Maine and is using a 3,611,728 

MWhr for our existing and future amount of renewable energy production. The problem with this 

baseline is that we do not know how much of this electricity is being sent out of state to meet 

renewable energy contracts in other states and would Maine be unable to be given credit for this 

generation of electricity. Thus for Maine to be able to understand whether our renewable 

energy baseline is correct and appropriate for this rule EPA would need to explain how renewable 

energy generation is to be credited to a State’s goal, in the baseline as well as in the future. Can 

EPA explain to Maine how this dilemma will be reconciled? -- OAP

 I do not know what amount of electricity generated in state is under contract to other states and I 

have just read where we get 18% of our electricity from Canada. How is a state to track what 

electricity is should be accounted for under the 111(d) plan? With that said how can we 

accurately comment on the baseline and goal requirements?