alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0940 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NE-15-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modify power 

turbine (PT)

containment ring 

by installing 

reinforcement liner

8.0 $ 680.00 $6,782 $7,462.00 111 $828,282.00

(SP3478EN-E) $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $828,282

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): N/A

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61766-61767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28155]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; AIDS Research Review Committee 
(AIDSRRC) Independent SEP.
    Date: January 18, 2018.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 61767]]

    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Robert C. Unfer, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Room 3F40 MSC 9823, Rockville, MD 20892-9823, 240-669-5035, 
[email protected].

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PHS 2018-1 Topic 54 & 55: Adjuvant 
Discovery & Development for Autoimmune Diseases.
    Date: January 31, 2018.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dharmendar Rathore, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Room 3G30, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 
Fishers Lane, Drive, MSC 9823, Bethesda, MD 20892-9823, 240-669-
5058, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 22, 2017.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-28155 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
exv10w26



 






Exhibit 10.26



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	)	 	 
	PALOMAR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and	 	)	 	 
	THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION.	 	)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	)	 	 
	 
	 	Plaintiff,	 	)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	)	 	 
	 
	 	v.	 	)	 	C.A. No. 06-CV-11171
	 
	 	 	 	)	 	 
	ALMA LASERS, INC.	 	)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	)	 	 
	 
	 	Defendants.	 	)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	)	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 





STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 




          Plaintiff Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. and The General Hospital Corporation and
Defendant Alma Lasers, Inc. hereby stipulate and agree that in the above-captioned matter, all
claims shall be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, and
each party waives all rights of appeal.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Respectfully submitted,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	PALOMAR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES,

	 	ALMA LASERS, INC.	 	 
	INC. and THE GENERAL HOSPITAL
	 	 	 	 
	CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By their attorneys,

	 	By it’s attorneys,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Kate Saxton

	 	/s/ John J. Cotter	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Wayne L. Stoner (BBO # 548015)

	 	John J. Cotter (BBO # 554524)	 	 
	Vinita Ferrera (BBO # 631190)

	 	Thomas A. Turano (BBO # 552168)	 	 
	Kate Saxton (BBO # 655903)

	 	David A. Simons (BBO # 638740)	 	 
	Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

	 	Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham LLP	 	 
	60 State Street

	 	State Street Financial Center	 	 
	Boston, Massachusetts 02109

	 	One Lincoln Street	 	 
	(617) 526-6000

	 	Boston, Massachusetts 02111	 	 
	(617) 526-5000

	 	(617) 261-3100	 	 






 









 






SO ORDERED this                      day of                     , 2007,




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	United States District Judge
Denver Ivan WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Charles L. Kelly, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Charles L. Kelly, Jr.
|Chief Financial Officer  

Date: August 8, 2008



31
Sam T. SCHIFFMAN, Sr., Appellant, v. William SCHIFFMAN, Sr., Personal Representative, Estate of Morris E. Schiffman, Sr., Appellee.

No. 1D17-5366

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2018

Sam T. Schiffman, Sr., pro se, Appellant.

Jeffrey P. Whitton, Panama City, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying a motion to compel and take depositions. The order is not a final order or an appealable, non-final order. Accordingly, Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Wetherell, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices 

# Order

February 1, 2017

155227

- 8 (60)

DORICE M. BOYD,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155227

COA: 333414

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE Wayne CC: 15

- 011731

- CZ

INSURANCE CO.,

Defendant

- Third Party Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v

ORLANDO PEAY,

Third Party Defendant

- Appellant,

v

STATE TREASURER,

Third Party Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

STATE TREASURER,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155228

COA: 333415

ORLANDO PEAY, Wayne CC: 15

- 013864

- CZ

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

DORICE M. BOYD and AMERICAN EQUITY

INVESTMENT LIFE INSURANCE CO.,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_____________________________________/I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1, 2017

jam 2

Clerk On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is

DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable

for filing fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of

the Court the initial partial filing fee of $75.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the

payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returne d with this

order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this

Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments

shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the

deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $300.00.

This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil actions

in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and return

plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James E. Hogue, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Wiltex
A, Inc., (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1. the accompanying Form 10QSB report for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. By: /s/ JAMES E. HOGUEJames E. HoguePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
 Date: August 16, 2004
Vantwain LaShun STOKES v. STATE

CR-15-0887

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph DEGREGORIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3372

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,303]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Hospira, Inc., Morgan Hill, California.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of  Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-5914 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
James A. GREENE, DC# R60557, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5619

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7480]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is 
publishing a current list of countries which require or may require 
participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within 
the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).

Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
United Arab Emirates
Yemen, Republic of

    Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to 
future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury.

    Date: March 27, 2009.
John L. Harrington,
International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9-7480 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6991]



[[Page 14184]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Correction; Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic 
Management Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a notice of a meeting that was published 
on March 20, 2009 (72 FR 11987; FR Doc. E9-6176]. In that notice the 
FAA advised the public of a meeting of the RTCA Government/Industry Air 
Traffic Management Advisory Committee. Inadvertently the notice was 
published with an incorrect meeting date of March 16, 2009. The correct 
date of the RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee meeting is May 27, 2009.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 27, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at FAA Headquarters, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Bessie Coleman Conference Center (2nd Floor), 
Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org. METRO: L'Enfant Plaza Station 
(Use 7th & Maryland Exit).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Correction: In the Federal Register of March 
20, 2009 (FR Doc. E9-6176) in the third column in the DATES section 
change the date of the meeting from ``March 16, 2009'' to ``May 27, 
2009''. Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions);
    <bullet> Report from RTCA Task Force on NextGen Mid-Term 
Implementation (NextGen TF);
    <bullet> ATMAC Member Discussion and Recommendations;
    <bullet> Closing Plenary (Other Business, Member Discussion, 
Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20, 2009.
Meredith Gibbs,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
 [FR Doc. E9-6991 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Donna M. HIBBERT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. AB WEST LLC, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1112

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
| (1)   | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rider Exploration, Inc.. for the year ended 10/31/09 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 10/31/09, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rider Exploration, Inc. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                    |                                     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:                     | /s/ Steve Friberg                   |   |
|   |                    |                                     |   |
|   | Name:                   | Steve Friberg                            |   |
|   |                    |                                     |   |
|   | Title:        | Principal Executive Officer,             |   |
|   |                    | Principal Financial Officer and Director |   |
|   |                    |                                     |   |
|   | Date:    | April 13, 2010                           |   |

----
EXHIBIT 10.8  GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES INCOME
TRUST  Summary of Trustee
Compensation  The following is a summary of the currently
effective compensation of the trustees of Government Properties Income Trust
(the Company) for services as trustees, which is subject to modification at
any time by the Board of Trustees.  ·Each Independent Trustee receives an annual
fee of $25,000, plus a fee of $500 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $500 fees are payable if a board
meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the same date.  ·The chairpersons of the Audit Committee, the
Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, each of
whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $7,500,
$3,500 and $3,500, respectively.  ·Each trustee is entitled to receive a grant
of 1,250 of the Companys common shares of beneficial interest on the date of
the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for
trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the
first board meeting attended).  ·The Company generally reimburses all trustees
for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as trustees.
Monte Delvin KOON, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, National Association fka The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. as Successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., as Trustee for Ramp 2005-RS4, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-1268

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL 1 INC. TRUST 2006-NC5, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-NC5, Appellant, v. SFL PROPERTY HOLDING LLC, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D16-55

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 17, 2018

McGlinchey Stafford, and N. Mark New II, Karin L. Posser, and William L. Grimsley (Jacksonville), for appellant.

Wesoloski Carlson, P.A. and Erik D. Wesoloski, for appellee, SFL Property Holding, LLC.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and SALTER, JJ.

**ON CONFESSION OF ERROR**

PER CURIAM.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company ("Deutsche Bank"), the plaintiff below, appeals the trial court's order granting final summary judgment in favor of the defendant below, SFL Property Holding LLC ("SFL Property"), and dismissing the instant mortgage foreclosure action. The trial court found that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

Based upon the record before us and the defendant's confession of error, we reverse the trial court's order granting the motion for summary judgment and remand to the trial court for reinstatement of the complaint. *See**Bartram v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n*, 211 So.3d 1009 (Fla. 2016) ; *Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Ams. v. Beauvais* ("*Beauvais II*"), 188 So.3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (en banc);1*see also, e.g.*, *Bollettieri Resort Villas Condo. Ass'n v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon*, 228 So.3d 72 (Fla. 2017) ; *Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. BH-NV Invs. 1, LLC*, 230 So.3d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; *Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Spence*, 213 So.3d 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; *Arnoux v. Bank of N.Y.*, 193 So.3d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Reversed and remanded for reinstatement of the complaint.

1

We note that the trial court did not have the benefit of *Bartram* or this Court's en banc opinion, *Beauvais II*, when it entered final judgment in favor of SFL Property.