alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 4. 1975 The Honorable Everett L. Anschutz Executive Secretary Opinion No. H- 682 Employees Retirement System ofTexas Box 12337, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Dear Mr. Anschutz: Re: Whether the Employees Retirement System can grant credit for service as a county attorney.
You have asked whether the provision ofarticle 6228a. section 4H, V. T.C.S., authorizing the Employees Retirement System (hereafter ERS) to grant credit for service as a county attorney so long as such service is not “simultaneously credited byany other retirement system or program” is valid in light ofthe recently enacted article 16, section 67 ofthe Texas Constitution. . Attorney General Opinion M-941 (1971) was decided under the constitutional provisions existing at that time and upheld the constitutionality of similar statutes authorizing credit for service as a county attorney. Article 16. section 67(a)(4) provides that general laws establishing retirement systems shall remain in effect subject tothe general powers ofthe legislature. Thus, article 6228a, section 4H, remains effective unless it clearly violates aprovision ofthe Constitution. Inour view the only pertinent provision of’article 16, section 67, is subsection (a)(2) which provides inpart that:

aperson may not receive benefits from more than one system for the same service . . . However, article 6228a, section 4H does notauthorize such adual receipt ofbenefits, for service may not be credited bythe ERS ifitis simultaneously credited by another system. Furthermore, service credited bythe ERS “may notthereafter be simultaneously credited by any other system. ” Art. 6228a. sec. 4H. Thus, aperson could not receive benefits from more than one system for the same service. Since we are aware of noother constitutional provision which might prohibit the crediting of service as acounty attorney, in our opinion the ERS~may do SO.
p. 2969L

. -
The Honorable Everett L. Anschutz. page 2 (H-682)

SUMMARY The Employees Retirement System may grant credit for service as a county attorney to aqualified member ofthe System. Very truly yours,
Attorney General of Texas APPROVED:

Opinion Committee

p. 2970
Raymond PLATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Gerber, C.J.

The defendant appeals from his convictions and sentences for one count of grand theft and one count of uttering a forged instrument. On all of the arguments which the defendant raises in appeal of his convictions, we affirm his convictions without further discussion.

However, on the defendant's argument that the trial court erred by failing to renew the offer of counsel or conducting another *Faretta*1 hearing before sentencing, *400we agree. As we recently stated in *Birlkey v. State* , 220 So.3d 431 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) :

> As sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding ... a trial court must renew the offer of counsel even if the defendant has previously waived counsel. Prior to sentencing, even if a defendant does not request appointment of counsel, this omission is not considered a knowing waiver of the right to counsel.

> ....

> Sentencing is a critical and often complicated part of the criminal process involving subtleties that may be beyond the appreciation of the average layperson. A defendant who is unfamiliar with the post-conviction process may inadvertently waive a meritorious argument that he or she might otherwise have raised on appeal. Given these intricacies, it is particularly important that a sentencing court be certain that a defendant understands the perilous path he or she traverses by proceeding to sentencing without the benefit of counsel.

*Id.* at 435-36 (internal citations and punctuation omitted).

Based on the foregoing, we vacate the defendant's sentences on both counts and remand for a new sentencing hearing, at which the trial court shall renew the offer of counsel or conduct another *Faretta* hearing if the defendant again seeks to represent himself during sentencing. Our holding moots the defendant's other arguments attacking his sentence, though the defendant may raise those arguments to the trial court should those arguments become relevant during the sentencing hearing.

*Convictions affirmed; sentences reversed; remanded for resentencing.*

Taylor and Conner, JJ., concur.

1

*Faretta v. California* , 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).
John V. KOLES a/k/a John Koles, Appellant, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; Unknown Spouse of John V. Koles a/k/a John Koles, n/k/a Carol Koles; La Tremiti Homeowner's Association, Inc. ; Palmira Golf and Country Club Master Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4522

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Consolidated  Balance Sheet  at  September 30, 1998 and Consolidated
Statement  of  Operations for the three months ended September 30, 1998, and is
qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        5424 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                16051 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   472 
<INVENTORY>                                   6207 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             28993 
<PP&E>                                       34260 
<DEPRECIATION>                               21250 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               43122 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        15066 
<BONDS>                                        310 
<COMMON>                                       477 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                   25527 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 43122 
<SALES>                                       6728 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             16874 
<CGS>                                         3014 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 8125 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (426)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concurrent Computer Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation certifies that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date: November 2, 2010





By:
/s/Dan MondorDan MondorPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc.
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 12, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Anthony C. MazzulloAnthony C. MazzulloPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Paul D. Meringolo, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|/s/ Paul D. Meringolo                                                         
|Paul D. Meringolo Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and President

Date: November 3, 2010
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 63 (Friday, April 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7474]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on March 23, 2009, a proposed consent 
decree in United States, et al., v. Petroleum Reclaiming Service, Inc., 
No. 09-cv-05157, was lodged with the United States District Court for 
the Western District of Washington.
    In this action, the United States, State of Washington, Puyallup 
Tribe of Indians and Muckleshoot Indian Tribe sought natural resource 
damages for releases of hazardous substances into Commencement Bay, 
Washington. Under the consent decree, defendant will pay $638,391.06 in 
natural resource damages and reimburse $111,608.94 in damage assessment 
costs.
    For thirty (30) days after the date of this publication, the 
Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to 
[email protected] or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In either case, the 
comments should refer to United States v. Petroleum Reclaiming Service, 
Inc., No. 09-cv-05157, D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-2-1049/14.
    During the comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined on 
the following Department of Justice Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, or by faxing or e-
mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood ([email protected]), fax 
no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In 
requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a 
check in the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) 
payable to the United States Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward 
a check in that amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated 
address.

Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
 [FR Doc. E9-7474 Filed 4-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
```
[No. 30491-1-II.

Division Two.

May 11, 2004.]

#### The State *of*Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lonnie Dean House, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 03-1-00407-1, James J. Stonier, J., entered June 6, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., concurred in by Houghton and Bridgewater, JJ.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 1, 2011 |   | /s/ George Dory                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | George Dory, Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, principal financialofficer and principal accounting officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                10552840
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           819629
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            411450
<INVENTORY>                                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                             0
<PP&E>                                                                10160969
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         8219719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        12922384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                        0
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             9931959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          12922384
<SALES>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       1105633
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         97289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        1008344
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    1008344
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           1008344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                             5.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2






HOME TOUCH HOLDING COMPANY




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Home Touch Holding Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stella Wai Yau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Stella Wai YauStella Wai YauDate: June 29, 2010

Chief Financial Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 919 

Recognizing the 83rd anniversary of the groundbreaking of Fort Leonard 

Wood, Missouri. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2023 

Mr. ALFORD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 83rd anniversary of the groundbreaking of 

Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. 

Whereas, on December 3, 1940, the Army broke ground near 

Rolla, Missouri; 

Whereas the post was named for Major General Leonard 

Wood, who was not only a military hero awarded the 

Medal of Honor, but also a surgeon; 

Whereas, in March of 1941, the first elements of an Engineer 

Replacement Training Center arrived at Fort Leonard 

Wood, Missouri; 

Whereas, during World War II, more than 300,000 soldiers 

passed through Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, on the 

way to perform military service; 

2 

•HRES 919 IH 

Whereas, currently, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, trains 

80,000 members of the Armed Forces and civilians each 

year; and 

Whereas Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, is a prestigious military installation that trains nearly every branch of the 

Armed Forces: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 83rd anniversary of the groundbreaking of Fort 

3 Leonard Wood, Missouri. 

Æ
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION a/k/a USAA, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Melanie Manzo-Pianelli and Alana Proctor, Appellees.

No. 4D16-3124

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 7, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cordell WADE v. STATE

CR-15-1041

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016 Reh. denied October 28, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Pamela L. SHELTON a/k/a Pamela Shelton, Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK; United States of America; Florida Housing Finance Corporation; Unknown Spouse of Pamela L. Shelton, a/k/a Pamela Shelton ; Unknown Spouse of Sharon K. Ruby; Unknown Spouse of Audrey Ruby a/k/a Audrey M. Ruby; Unknown Tenant # 1; Unknown Tenant # 2; and ALl Unknown Parties Claiming an Interest By, Through, Under or Against Any Defendant, or Claiming Any Right, Title, and Interest in the Subject Property, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-2187

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.