Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 1 of 32

Standard Operation Procedure for Trace Element Analysis of 

Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewaters Using ICP-MS 

Collision/Reaction Cell Procedure 

1.0 Introduction

1.1 This document describes procedures used to measure elements in Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD) wastewaters. One of the most widely used technologies for 

removing pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, from flue gas emissions produced by coalfired power plants, is a flue gas desulfurization that typically involves spraying a 

limestone slurry or other sorbent into the flue gas stream to convert gaseous sulfur 

dioxide to calcium sulfate (gypsum) or calcium sulfite. Many of the contaminants from 

the coal, limestone and make-up water are concentrated in the circulating water of the 

scrubbing system. So in order to maintain appropriate plant operating conditions, a 

purge stream of water containing these contaminants often has to be discharged from 

the scrubbers. This purge stream can contain high concentrations of gypsum, heavy 

metals, alkali earth metals, chlorides and dissolved organic compounds. 

1.2 The ICP-MS spectrometer with the Universal Cell can operate in reaction, collision 

and standard modes. The composition of Flue Gas Desulfurization wastewaters can 

include high levels of dissolved salts. The use of instrument configurations and/or 

accessories designed to accommodate samples with high dissolved solids levels is 

highly recommended. This method was developed on a Perkin Elmer NexION 300D 

ICP/MS using an Environmental Scientific SC-DX FAST Automated Sample 

Introduction System.

1.3 The procedure described in this document is applicable to the analysis of acid 

digested FGD wastewater, and has been evaluated for the analysis of 13 elements of 

interest. These are Al, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se, Ag, Tl, V and Zn; see 

Attachment 1. Additional elements may be included provided that the performance 

criteria presented in Sections 9 and 12 are met. 

1.4 Although this procedure is written to address the FGD wastewater matrix, it is also 

very capable of addressing less complex matrices such as drinking water, non-potable 

water, and solids. The use of Universal Cell Technology is also effective for the 

interferences that maybe found in these matrices. Appropriate sample preparation 

steps and quality assurance practices for these sample types may be different than 

described herein.

. 

2.0 Hardware Description

2.1 The NexION 300D with the Universal Cell TechnologyTM (UCT) allows the analyst to 

choose the most appropriate collision/reaction cell (CRC) conditions for each analyte in 

FGD wastewater samples, without any restrictions to the type of gases that can be used. 

The three modes of interference removal available in the NexION 300 are: 

Standard Mode: The cell is actively vented. This enables the instrument to be run in true 

standard mode, with the cell conditions optimized for maximum ion transition. For FGD 

 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 2 of 32

 wastewater samples, this mode is ideal for heavy metals like Pb and Tl, where there are 

very few polyatomic spectral interferences. 

Collision Mode: In this mode, the instrument offers conventional collision cell capability 

with kinetic energy discrimination (KED). By using a non-reactive gas, such as helium, 

the collision mode with KED removes many of the simple solvent- and argon-based 

polyatomic spectral interferences. This makes it ideal for elements such as Co, Ni, Cu and 

Zn which are prone to the larger cross-sectional polyatomic interferences to be concerned 

about. It is also effective for other analytes, such as As and Se. 

Reaction Mode: A technique that offers the best available detection capability. This 

mode, known as DRC (Dynamic Reaction CellTM) technology, removes the majority of 

interferences with little or no loss of analyte sensitivity by using pure reaction gases like 

ammonia while not allowing any reaction byproducts to leave the cell which could cause 

further interferences. DRC technology features a scanning quadrupole with a bandpass 

that removes by-product reactions created in the Universal Cell. Therefore any reaction 

gas can be used and in its pure form. And by optimizing the cell’s quadrupole conditions, 

only the element of interest is allowed to pass through to the analyzing quadrupole. It is 

well recognized that ion-molecule reaction chemistry offers the very best performance for 

the reduction of polyatomic interferences. This would be the mode of choice for the lowest 

possible detection limits for elements such as Cr, V and Mn. 

The NexION also features a unique triple cone interface (TCI), which includes an 

additional hyper skimmer cone to tightly define and focus the ion beam entering the 

quadrupole ion deflector. All three cones can be quickly and easily removed, cleaned or 

replaced, which is particularly relevant for the analysis of FGD wastewaters that contain 

high levels of matrix components.

The highly focused ion beam then emerges from the TCI and enters a quadrupole ion 

deflector (QID), which is designed around a proprietary, miniaturized quadrupole. This 

filtering technology bends the ion beam 90 degrees, focusing those of a specified mass 

into the universal cell and discarding all neutral species into the turbo pump. The path 

through the quadrupole ion deflector is aligned with the tightly defined beam leaving the 

triple cone interface, which ensures that ions and neutral species never impact or degrade 

component surfaces within the cell, virtually eliminating the need for cleaning. By 

removing the majority of particulates, neutrals and photons, this practical design 

significantly minimizes drift and delivers exceptional signal stability. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 3 of 32

Figure 1. NexION schematic 

2.3 The NexION 300 is capable of providing resolution, less than or equal to 0.9 amu at 10% 

peak height from 6-253 amu and 1.0 amu at 5% peak height from 6-253 amu with a data 

system that allows corrections for isobaric interferences and the application of the internal 

standard technique. The ICP-MS must be equipped with a collision/reaction cell for the 

removal of molecular interferences found in FGD wastewater samples. Any 

collision/reaction cell instrumentation that meets the specifications, and quality control 

requirements in this procedure may be used. 

2.4 A NexION 300D ICP-MS (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) coupled to an SC DX FAST (ESI, 

Omaha, NE) automated sample delivery system is used for this procedure. This delivery 

system is basically a rapid flow injection technique integrated into an autosampler, which 

significantly reduces the pre- and post-measurement times involved with delivering a new 

sample to and removing the previous sample from the ICP-MS. By optimizing these 

times, a significant improvement can be made in the sample throughput. The FAST 

portion of the delivery system uses a 6-port switching valve containing a Teflon sample 

loop. The sample loop is rapidly filled and evacuated with a vacuum pump and because 

the loop sits very close to the spray chamber, the time for the sample to be introduced is 

dramatically reduced. Equivalent autosamplers with rapid flow injection (aka switching 

valve) hardware is acceptable.

Figure 2. 6-Port valve schematic 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 4 of 32

Figure 3. SC DX FAST schematic 

2.5 Digestates are nebulized in a spray chamber where a stream of argon carries the sample 

aerosol through the quartz torch and injects it into an RF plasma. There the sample is 

desolvated and decomposed. An additional argon stream entering the spray chamber 

can by utilized for optional sample gas dilution instead of liquid dilution. The baffled, 

cyclonic spray chamber used in the SC DX FAST introduction system is Peltier-cooled to 

2o

C to ensure low oxides and greater stability of the instrument. The model PC3 Peltier 

chiller and spray chamber were used in this SOP but equivalent chilled spray chambers 

are acceptable. 

2.6 The ions produced are entrained in the plasma gas and by means of a water-cooled, 

differentially pumped interface, introduced into a high-vacuum chamber that houses a 

quadrupole ion deflector, a reaction/collision cell and a quadrupole mass spectrometer 

capable of providing a resolution better than or equal to 0.9 amu peak width at 10% of the 

peak height. The ions are separated according to their mass-to-charge ratio and 

measured with a detector, such as an electron multiplier. 

2.7 Universal Cell utilizing helium and/or reactive gases such as NH3 is used to remove 

molecular interferences. See Attachment 1 for recommended analyte masses and modes 

of operation. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 5 of 32

2.8 Interferences not eliminated by the collision/reaction cell must be assessed and valid 

corrections applied, or the data flagged to indicate problems. Interference correction 

must include compensation for interferences not removed by the collision/reaction cell. 

Recommended elemental equations are listed in Attachment 2. Use of the internal 

standard technique is required to compensate for suppression and enhancement caused 

by sample matrices. Recommended internal standards are listed in Attachment 3. 

3.0 Definitions

3.1 Batch – A group of samples which behave similarly with respect to the sampling or 

the testing procedures being employed and which are processed as a unit. For QC 

purposes, if the number of samples in a group is greater than 20, then each group of 

20 samples or less will all be handled as a separate batch. 

3.2 Dissolved Metals - Those elements which pass through a 0.45-m membrane filter 

(sample is acidified after filtration). 

3.3 Total Recoverable Metals - The concentration determined on an unfiltered sample 

following treatment with hot, diluted mineral acids, as described in this procedure. 

3.4 Instrument Detection Limit (IDL) - See Section 12.2. 

3.5 Sensitivity - The slope of the analytical curve (i.e., the functional relationship between 

raw instrument signal and the concentration). 

3.6 Tuning Solution - This is a multi-element solution containing analytes which are 

representative of the entire mass range capable of being scanned by the instrument. 

It is used to optimize the sensitivity of the instrument and to verify the mass resolution 

meets method criteria. 

3.7 Initial Calibration Verification / Quality Control Standard (ICV/QCS) - A multielement standard of known concentrations prepared to verify instrument calibration. 

This solution must be an independently prepared standard at a concentration level 

near the mid-point of the calibration curve. 

3.8 Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) - A multi-element standard of known 

concentrations prepared to monitor and verify the instrument daily continuing 

performance. 

3.9 Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Fortified Blank (LCS/LFB) - A multielement standard of known concentrations that is carried through the entire sample 

preparation and analysis procedure. This solution is used to verify method 

performance in an ideal sample matrix. 

3.10 Matrix Spike / Laboratory Fortified Sample (MS/LFS) – A sample to which known 

concentrations of the elements of interest are added. The fortified sample is taken 

through all preparation and analytical steps of the procedure. The results are used to 

determine the effect of the sample matrix on analyte recovery efficiency. 

3.11 Laboratory Reagent Blank / Method Blank (LRB/MB) – Reagent water containing 

the same acid matrix as the calibration standards that is carried through the entire 

digestion process. The method blank is used to determine the concentrations of trace 

metals in the reagents used to prepare and analyze the samples as well as the 

contribution of contamination from the digestion process. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 6 of 32

3.12 Calibration Blank – Reagent water acidified with the same acid concentrations 

present in the standards and samples. Also referred to as the Initial Calibration Blank 

(ICB) and Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB). 

3.13 Reporting Limit (RL) – The minimum concentration that can be reported with a 

specified degree of confidence. The RL can be no lower than the concentration of the 

lowest initial calibration standard. 

3.14 Method Detection Limit (MDL) – Refers to the instructions in Appendix B to 40 CFR 

Part 136. Also see Section 12.1 of this document. The MDL is determined from 

analysis of a sample in a given matrix containing the analyte. 

3.15 Individual FGD Interference Check Solutions – Single element solutions at 

concentrations similar to those found in flue gas desulfurization wastewaters. 

3.16 Synthetic FGD Wastewater – A mixed solution of elements at typical concentrations 

found in flue gas desulfurization wastewaters. 

4.0 Interferences

4.1 Isobaric Interferences 

4.1.1 Isobaric interferences in the ICP/MS are caused by isotopes of different 

elements forming ions with the same nominal mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). 

4.1.2 Except for small interferences from Sn on In (In used as internal standard) and 

from Kr on 78Se, which can be avoided by using argon free of Kr, the 

recommended ions used for the elements in this procedure do not have 

elemental isobaric interferences. 

4.2 Isobaric Molecular Interferences 

4.2.1 Isobaric molecular interferences are caused by ions consisting of more than 

one atom. These molecular interferences are minimized by use of the 

collision/reaction cell utilizing He, and/or NH3 gases. Common examples are 

potential interferences from 40Ar35Cl or 40Ca35Cl on 75As, or 35Cl16O on 51V, or 

40Ar12C on 52Cr. 

4.2.2 Collision cell interference removal works both by causing the interfering 

molecular ion to dissociate and by reducing the kinetic energy of the ion. The 

latter is termed Kinetic Energy Discrimination (KED), and is the primary 

mechanism for interference removal. Polyatomic ions are usually larger than 

elemental ions, and so collide with the helium atoms in the collision cell more 

frequently than the smaller elemental ions. Each collision reduces the energy 

of the ion, so the molecular ions lose energy more quickly. An energy barrier 

before the analyzing quadrupole prevents passage of the now low energy 

molecular ions. 

4.2.3 Reaction mode works on the principle that the interfering molecular ion reacts 

with reactive gas (e.g., NH3) to form new ions of differing mass than the 

analyte isotope or by effecting charge transfer from the interfering molecular 

ion to form a neutral molecule. 

4.3 Doubly Charged Ion Interferences 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 7 of 32

4.3.1 Doubly charged elemental ion interferences are possible in cases where the 

second ionization potential of the element is significantly below the first 

ionization potential for argon (15.7eV). If a doubly charged ion is formed, it will 

cause a response at half of its elemental mass, potentially causing 

interference. Fortunately, most elements have high enough second ionization 

potentials that formation of doubly charged ions is not an issue. Some double 

charged interferences may be removed in reaction mode by using NH3. 

4.3.2 For the target analytes in this procedure, a significant potential for interference 

is from 150Nd and 150Dy (potential interference on 75As) and from 156Gd 

(potential interference on 78Se). To check for these potential interferences, 

monitor the response for mass 150 and 156. If the cps for these masses is > 5 

times the cps for the quantitation limit for arsenic (in the case of mass 150) or 

selenium (in the case of mass 156), interference is possible. In this case, 

analyze a 100 ppb standard of Nd and Dy (if mass 150 is observed) or Gd (if 

mass 156 is observed), and measure the response at 150 and 75 (or 156 and 

78). This ratio can then be used to create an interference correction equation. 

4.3.3 For example, if the response for a 100 ppb Gd standard at mass 156 is 10,000 

cps, and the observed response for the same standard at mass 78 is 1,000 

counts, then the equation for 78Se would be: 

ܵ݁ ଻଼ ൌ ܵ݁ ଻଼ െ ܩ݀ ଵହ଺

10

4.4 Physical Interferences 

4.4.1 Physical interferences are associated with the transport and nebulization 

process. Internal standards are used to compensate for these types of 

interferences. 

4.4.2 Internal standards should be added at a level to give approximately 20,000 – 

1,500,000 counts of raw signal intensity. The mass of the internal standard 

should ideally be within 50 amu of the mass of the measured analyte, but this 

is not mandatory with current instrumentation. Consideration should also be 

given to matching internal standards to analytes with similar ionization 

potentials. 

4.4.3 Matrix effects are monitored by comparing the internal standard intensity in the 

sample to the internal standard intensity of the calibration blank. The internal 

standards must be between 60% and 125% of the intensity in the calibration 

blank. If they are outside this window the sample is diluted by a factor of 2 

(1:1) and is reanalyzed. 

4.4.4 Memory effects are dependent on the relative concentration differences 

between samples and/or standards which are analyzed sequentially. The rinse 

period between samples must be long enough to eliminate significant memory 

interference. See Section 10.3.6 

5.0 Safety

5.1 This procedure involves hazardous materials, operations and equipment. This 

procedure does not purport to address all of the safety problems associated with its 

use. It is the responsibility of the user of the method to follow appropriate safety, waste 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 8 of 32

disposal, and health practices under the assumption that all samples and reagents are 

potentially hazardous. Safety glasses, gloves, lab coats and closed-toe, nonabsorbent 

shoes are required.

5.2 Specific Safety Concerns or Requirements 

5.2.1 Eye protection that satisfies ANSI Z87.1, laboratory coat, and non-powdered 

nitrile gloves must be worn while handling samples, standards, solvents, and 

reagents. Disposable gloves that have been contaminated must be removed 

and discarded; non-disposable gloves must be cleaned immediately. 

5.3 Primary Materials Used 

The following is a list of the materials used in this method, which have a serious or 

significant hazard rating. Note: This list does not include all materials used in the 

method. The table contains a summary of the primary hazards listed in the MSDS for 

each of the materials listed in Table 1. 

Table 1. Primary Materials with a Serious or Significant Hazard Rating 

Material1 Hazards Exposure 

Limit2 Signs and Symptoms of Exposure 

Nitric Acid Corrosive 

Oxidizer 

Poison 

2 ppmTWA 

4 ppmSTEL 

Nitric acid is extremely hazardous; it is 

corrosive, reactive, an oxidizer, and a poison. 

Inhalation of vapors can cause breathing 

difficulties and lead to pneumonia and 

pulmonary edema, which may be fatal. Other 

symptoms may include coughing, choking, 

and irritation of the nose, throat, and 

respiratory tract. Can cause redness, pain, 

and severe skin burns. Concentrated solutions 

cause deep ulcers and stain skin a yellow or 

yellow-brown color. Vapors are irritating and 

may cause damage to the eyes. Contact may 

cause severe burns and permanent eye 

damage. 

Hydrochloric 

Acid 

Corrosive 

Poison 

5 ppmCeiling Inhalation of vapors can cause coughing, 

choking, inflammation of the nose, throat, and 

upper respiratory tract, and in severe cases, 

pulmonary edema, circulatory failure, and 

death. Can cause redness, pain, and severe 

skin burns. Vapors are irritating and may 

cause damage to the eyes. Contact may 

cause severe burns and permanent eye 

damage. 

1 – Always add acid to water to prevent violent reactions. 

2 – Exposure limit refers to the OSHA regulatory exposure limit. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 9 of 32

6.0 Equipment and Supplies

6.1 Equipment 

6.1.1 The discrete sample introduction system enables the use of only the exact 

amount of sample volume required for data acquisition. In this procedure, a 

1.5 ml was adequate to accommodate the necessary analysis time. The loop 

size can be modified to suit the analysis time as needed. 

6.1.2 The sample introduction system also includes a PFA ST concentric nebulizer, 

2.0 mm quartz injector, and baffled cyclonic spray chamber with gas addition 

port (ESI, Omaha, NE), The spray chamber fits into the PC3 chiller described 

in Section 2.4. Other equivalent accessories and configurations that are 

designed to accommodate samples with high levels of dissolved solids may be 

used. 

6.1.3 PVC peristaltic pump tubing, orange-white, is used to produce a sample flow 

rate of 270 uL/min. This flow rate may be adjusted as necessary to optimize 

method conditions. 

6.1.4 A mixing tee is used to blend in the internal standards after the peristaltic pump 

and before the nebulizer. The mixing tee can be used with or without the 

discreet sample introduction system. If used with the discreet sample intro 

system, the mixing tee is inserted after the 6-port valve. The peristaltic pump 

tubing used for the internal standard solution is orange-white and when used in 

combination with orange-white pump tubing for the carrier solution or sample, 

creates a minimum dilution of approximately 8.1%. 

6.1.5 Automated sample dilution, liquid or gas, simplifies the dilution process and 

results in less matrix being deposited on the cones during analysis and 

minimizes the rinse times normally needed for difficult matrices. However, 

manual sample dilution is just as effective, albeit more labor intensive. 

6.1.6 Autosampler with autosampler tubes. 

6.1.7 Block digester with tubes. 

6.2 Supplies 

6.2.1 Argon gas: High purity grade (99.996%). 

6.2.2 Helium gas: Ultra High purity grade (99.999%). 

6.2.3 Ammonia gas, anhydrous: Ultra high purity grade (99.999%). 

6.2.4 Calibrated automatic pipettes. 

7.0 Reagents and Standards

7.1 Storage and Shelf-Life 

7.1.1 Stock standards are purchased high purity grade solutions obtained from 

reputable commercial sources. Standard solutions must be traceable to 

national or international standards measurement, such as NIST. All standards 

must be stored in FEP fluorocarbon or previously unused polyethylene or 

polypropylene bottles at room temperature. Standards stored at 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 10 of 32

concentrations as received from the vendor and mid-level dilutions must be 

replaced prior to the expiration date assigned by the vendor. If no expiration 

date is provided, the stocks and mid-level standards may be stored for up to 

one year. They must be replaced sooner if verification from an independent 

source indicates a problem. See Section 10.3.5 for initial calibration 

verification acceptance criteria. 

7.1.2 Working standards, i.e., all standards at concentrations ready to analyze on 

the ICP-MS (all except tuning mixes, which are received at ready-to-use 

concentrations) are prepared fresh daily. 

7.2 Standards 

7.2.1 Tuning Solution, 1 ppb

7.2.1.1 The tuning solution may be purchased as a custom multi-element 

mix ready to use as is or prepared according to individual 

instrument manufacturer directions. The concentrations of the 

required elements for the NexION 300D ICP-MS are shown in 

Attachment 4 and the acceptance criteria are shown in Attachment 

5. 

7.2.2 Dual Detector Calibration Solution

7.2.2.1 The dual detector solution may be commercially purchased as a 

custom multi-element mix ready to use as is or prepared according 

to manufacturer’s recommendations. See Attachment 6. 

7.2.2.2 Alternative elements may be used that are more specific to the 

analytes being tested. Such solutions should contain elements at 

200 ug/L or other concentrations that accommodate the dual 

detector algorithm. 

7.2.3 Calibration Standards 

7.2.3.1 Stock calibration standards are purchased as custom multi-element 

mixes or as single element solutions. 

7.2.3.2 Each day of analysis, the standards are diluted to working levels 

using 2% nitric acid and 0.5% hydrochloric acid matrix, to match the 

acid strength of the digestates. Suggested concentrations are given 

in Attachment 7, but the laboratory may adjust calibration standard 

concentrations as appropriate for the instrument and samples. At a 

minimum, a 3-point curve must be used. 

7.2.4 Mixed Interference Check Solution (Synthetic FGD Wastewater) 

7.2.4.1 The concentrations of the interferents below are representative of 

typical FGD field samples. If the samples are being diluted (liquid 

or gas) on-line, these concentrations must be used. However, if 

samples are diluted prior to analysis, the concentrations of the 

mixed interferent check solution may be reduced by the smallest 

dilution factor used on the FGD field samples. For example, if the 

field samples are diluted 1:10, then the Ca concentration would be 

200 mg/L. 

7.2.4.2 The following solution is prepared in 1.6% HCl 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 11 of 32

7.2.4.3 Calcium, 2,000 mg/L 

7.2.4.4 Magnesium, 1,000 mg/L 

7.2.4.5 Sulfate, 2,000 mg/L 

7.2.4.6 Sodium, 1,000 mg/L 

7.2.4.7 1-Butanol, 2000 mg/L 

7.2.5 Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) Standard 

7.2.5.1 The ICV stock is from a source different than the source for the 

calibration standards. 

7.2.5.2 Each day of analysis, the ICV standard is prepared in 2% HNO3 and 

0.5% HCl acid to the concentrations shown in Attachment 7. 

7.2.6 Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Standard 

7.2.6.1 The CCV standards are prepared from the same source as the 

calibration standards. 

7.2.6.2 The CCV standards are prepared fresh each day of analysis in 2% 

HNO3 and 0.5% HCl. The concentrations are shown in Attachment 

7. 

7.2.7 Internal Standards 

7.2.7.1 Internal standards are required, and recommended isotopes are 

provided in Attachment 3. Inclusion of 10% methanol to the internal 

standard solution when added via the mixing tee improves the 

count rate for those elements with high ionization potentials such as 

arsenic and selenium. A 10% methanol content in the internal 

standard solution will ultimately blend down to approximately 1% in 

the sample introduced into the spray chamber. 

7.2.8 Spiking Stock Solution 

7.2.8.1 The spike stock solution is prepared from the same stocks as the 

calibration standards using the 2% HNO3 and 0.5% HCl acid matrix.

7.2.8.2 Spike concentrations are listed in Attachment 7. 

7.3 Reagents 

7.3.1 Reagent Water – ASTM Type I or equivalent for the elements of interest, free 

of the elements of interest at the levels of interest. 

7.3.2 Blank Matrix - 2% HNO3 and 0.5% HCl.

7.3.3 Methanol – Semiconductor grade.

8.0 Sample Collection, Preservation, Shipment and Storage

8.1 Table 2 lists the holding times and the references that include preservation 

requirements. 

8.2 Sample preservation is performed by the sampler immediately upon sample collection 

or shipped to the laboratory unpreserved for preservation at the laboratory. If 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 12 of 32

preserved at the laboratory, then the sample must be held for at least 16 hours prior to 

digestion. 

8.3 If dissolved elements are to be determined, the samples are immediately filtered 

through a 0.45-μm membrane filter on-site by the sampler before adding preservative. 

Table 2. Holding Times 

Matrix Sample 

Container 

Min. 

Sample 

Size 

Preservation Holding Time Reference 

FGD 

wastewater 

HDPE 50 mL HNO3, pH < 2 180 Days 40 CFR Part 136.3

9.0 Quality Control 

9.1 Quality control requirements are also summarized in Attachment 8. 

9.2 Ongoing data quality checks are compared with established performance criteria to 

determine if the results of analyses meet the performance characteristics of the 

method. Any QC result that fails to meet control criteria must be documented. 

9.3 Synthetic FGD Interference Check Solution 

9.3.1 The synthetic FGD matrix solution listed in Section 7.2.4 is analyzed prior to 

initiating sample analysis. The synthetic FGD matrix solution must be analyzed 

at least once per day (immediately after calibration) while FGD wastewaters 

are being analyzed, and after any major changes to instrument operating 

conditions. 

9.3.1.1 Internal standard recovery must meet method criteria (Section 9.7) 

and concentrations of target elements observed should be less than 

their reporting limits. 

9.3.1.2 In some cases it may not be possible to obtain interference check 

solutions that are completely free of contamination. In these cases, 

results up to 5X the reporting limit are acceptable if it is possible to 

demonstrate that the isotopic ratios correspond to natural 

abundances. For example, the natural abundances of zinc isotopes 

are 64Zn 48.6%; 66Zn 27.9%; 67Zn 4.1%; 68Zn 18.8%; 70Zn 0.6%. The 

measured ratios are not expected to be exact, especially for low 

abundance isotopes, and some isotopes may be masked by other 

elements in the solution, (for example 70Zn in the above example 

will be masked by 70Ge) but it must be possible to explain the 

observed ratios and clearly demonstrate that the observed 

contamination is not a result of polyatomic interferences. Because 

arsenic, manganese and aluminum are monoisotopic, this 

demonstration is not possible, and the level of interference 

observed must be less than the reporting limit. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 13 of 32

9.3.1.3 If the Synthetic FGD solution has to be diluted in order to analyze it 

effectively on the ICP-MS (i.e., meet all method criteria), then all 

samples and QC (including the MDL replicates) must be diluted by 

at least the same factor. Example FGD solution results are given in 

Attachment 9. 

9.3.2 Laboratory Fortified Synthetic FGD solution 

9.3.2.1 The synthetic FGD solution is spiked with 40 ug/L of each of the 

target elements (400 ug/L for zinc and 4000 ug/L for aluminum) and 

analyzed once per day, immediately after the synthetic FGD check 

in Section 9.3. All target elements must be recovered within 70-

130% of the spiked value. For other target elements that are 

routinely detected at concentrations significantly higher than 100 

ug/L, the spike concentrations may be elevated accordingly. 

Likewise, if zinc and aluminum are routinely detected at 

concentrations significantly lower than those above, the spike 

concentrations may be lowered accordingly. 

9.3.2.2 If the Laboratory Fortified Synthetic FGD solution has to be diluted 

in order to analyze it effectively on the ICP-MS (i.e., meet all 

method criteria), then all samples and QC (including the MDL 

replicates) must be diluted by at least the same factor. 

9.4 Method Blank (MB) 

9.4.1 The method blank consists of reagent water that has been processed in the 

same manner as the samples. One method blank must be processed with 

each preparation batch. 

9.4.1.1 Acceptance Criteria: Method blank results are acceptable if the 

concentration for each analyte of interest is less than the reporting 

limit. 

9.4.1.2 Corrective Action: If the method blank does not meet the 

acceptance criteria, the source of contamination should be 

investigated to determine if the problem can be minimized or 

eliminated. Samples associated with the contaminated blank shall 

be reprocessed for analysis, or under the following circumstances, 

may be reported as qualified (qualifier flags or narrative comments 

must be included on report): 

9.4.1.2.1 The same analyte was not detected in the associated 

samples; 

9.4.1.2.2 The method blank concentration is less than 1/10 of the 

measured concentration of any sample in the batch; 

9.4.1.2.3 The method blank concentration is less than 1/10 the 

specified regulatory limit; or 

9.4.1.2.4 The analyte is a common laboratory contaminant 

(copper, iron, lead, calcium, magnesium, potassium, 

sodium, or zinc) and is less than 2 times the reporting 

limit. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 14 of 32

9.4.1.2.5 If the above criteria are not met and reanalysis is not 

possible, then the sample data must be qualified. This 

contamination must be addressed in the project narrative 

and the client must be notified. 

9.5 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 

9.5.1 The LCS consists of reagent water that is spiked with the analytes of interest 

as summarized in Attachment 7. One LCS must be processed (digestion and 

analysis) for each preparation batch. 

9.5.1.1 Acceptance Criteria: LCS control limits should be based on three 

standard deviations of past laboratory results. These limits are not 

to exceed 85-115% recovery. The control limits are maintained in a 

LIMS or other appropriate system. 

9.5.1.2 Corrective Action: If the LCS % recovery falls outside of the 

control limits for any analyte, that analyte is judged to be out of 

control. All associated samples must be reprocessed for analysis of 

at least those affected analytes. One possible exception is a 

recovery for a given element above the upper control limit with no 

associated detection for the same element in the samples. 

9.6 Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD) 

9.6.1 The MS is prepared by taking a second aliquot of a selected sample and 

spiking it with the analytes of interest as summarized in Attachment 7. 

9.6.2 The MSD is prepared by taking a third aliquot of the selected sample and 

spiking it with the analytes of interest as summarized in Attachment 7. 

9.6.3 The MS and MSD are processed in the same manner as the samples. One 

MS/MSD pair must be processed every 10 samples. 

9.6.3.1 Acceptance Criteria: Control limits should be based on three 

standard deviations of past laboratory results. These limits are not 

to exceed 70-130% recovery, and 20% relative percent difference 

(RPD). The control limits should be maintained in the LIMS system. 

If the sample concentration for a specific analyte in the sample 

selected for spiking is greater than the concentration added by the 

spike, then recovery accuracy may be reduced and the combined 

concentration may well exceed the calibration range. In this case a 

dilution test may be performed. A 1:5 dilution should agree within 

20% of the original determination. If not, a physical or chemical 

interference is suspected, and must be discussed in the sample 

narrative. The RPD is calculated as follows: 

|ሻܦܵܯሺܥ െ ሻܵܯሺܥ| ൌ ܦܴܲ

1

ሻሿܦܵܯሺܥ ൅ ሻܵܯሺܥሾ 2

ൈ 100%

Where C(MS) is the concentration observed in the MS 

 C(MSD) is the concentration observed in the MSD 

9.6.3.2 Corrective Action: If MS/MSD results and any applicable dilution 

tests do not meet the acceptance criteria and all other quality 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 15 of 32

control criteria have been met, then a matrix interference is 

suspected. Failed matrix spikes are flagged, and are discussed in 

the final report case narrative. When the concentration of any 

element in the selected sample is more than 5X the concentration 

of the spike concentration, then the acceptance criterion does not 

apply and the spike results should be flagged accordingly. 

9.7 Internal Standards Evaluation for Samples 

9.7.1 The internal standards (IS) in samples and QC (including the synthetic FGD 

solution) must be between 60 and 125% of the intensity in the calibration 

blank. 

9.7.2 If the sample intensities fall outside this range, the calibration blank is 

reanalyzed to confirm the instrument has not drifted out of control. If the 

criteria is met, the sample is diluted by a factor of 2 (1:1) and reanalyzed. 

Dilution factors should increase as necessary until the IS recovery meets the 

acceptance criterion. 

9.7.3 IS limits and corrective actions for standards and blanks are described in 

Section 10. 

10.0 Procedure

10.1 Procedural variations are allowed only if deemed necessary in the professional 

judgment of the Laboratory Director to accommodate variation in sample matrix, 

radioactivity, chemistry, sample size, or other parameters. Any variation in procedure 

shall be thoroughly documented and noted in the laboratory narrative. Any deviations 

from this procedure must also be documented as a nonconformance, with a cause 

and corrective action described. 

10.2 Sample Preparation 

10.2.1 EPA Method 1638 was used as the reference for the digestion of the samples 

in which section 12.2 describes Aqueous Sample Preparation. 

10.2.2 Transfer a 50mL (± 0.5 mL) aliquot from a well-mixed, acid-preserved sample 

to a 50mL block digestion tube. 

10.2.3 Add 1.0mL of concentrated nitric acid and 0.25mL concentrated hydrochloric 

acid. (If samples are received unpreserved, add 1% nitric acid and store for at 

least 16 hours before preparation). 

10.2.4 Prepare sample aliquots and spike the LCS and MS/MSD samples per spiking 

protocols. 

10.2.5 Place a ribbed disposable watch glass over the digestion tube. 

10.2.6 Place the digestion tube into a block digester adjusted to achieve a 

temperature of approximately 85°C. 

10.2.7 Heat for 2 hours after 85°C is obtained. 

10.2.8 Remove the tubes from the block and allow to cool. 

10.2.9 Add deionized water to digestates to bring them back to 50.0 ml. 

10.3 Calibration 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 16 of 32

10.3.1 Instrument Start Up 

10.3.1.1 Setup the instrument according to manufacturer’s operating 

instructions. 

10.3.1.2 Allow the instrument to become thermally stable for at least 30 

minutes before tuning. 

10.3.2 Instrument Tuning / Mass Calibration 

10.3.2.1 Tune the instrument with a solution containing elements 

representing all of the mass regions of interest. The relative 

standard deviations must be less than 5% for a minimum of 5 

replicate integrations of the solution. 

10.3.2.2 Perform mass calibration and resolution check using the tuning 

solution at a minimum of every two weeks. 

10.3.2.2.1 Mass Calibration Check: The mass calibration results 

must be within 0.1 amu from the true value. 

10.3.2.2.2 Mass Resolution Check: The resolution must be 

verified to be less than 0.9 amu full width at 10% peak 

height. 

10.3.3 Dual Detector Calibration 

10.3.3.1 The dual detector calibration allows the quantification of results 

using both the pulse mode and analog mode of the detector. 

Analysis of a multi-element standard at a concentration sufficient 

(e.g., 200 ug/L) to allow the detector to function in both modes 

allows the software to determine conversion factors. These 

conversion factors are used to quantify elements detected in the 

analog mode by converting the observed counts to equivalent pulse 

mode counts. 

10.3.3.2 The dual detector calibration is only required for those isotopes that 

will trigger the analog mode of the detector (e.g., >2 million counts 

per second). Isotopes or elements that are known to always be 

present at count rates within pulse mode detection do not need to 

be included. Note that the dual detector calibration is specific to the 

isotopes and not necessarily the elements. 

10.3.3.3 The dual detector calibration must be performed at least every 

month. The correlation coefficient for each isotope must be >0.999. 

While there is no specific criterion for a minimum number of 

crossover points, it is recommended to have at least 10. The 

number of points can generally be increased by modifying the 

concentration of the affected element. Review of the count rate for 

the affected element will assist in determining if the element 

concentration should be increased or decreased from the default 

200 ug/L level. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 17 of 32

10.3.4 Initial Calibration 

10.3.4.1 The ICP-MS is calibrated each day of operation using a blank and 

at least 3 standards. See Section 7.2.3. Report the average of at 

least three replicate integrations. 

10.3.4.2 The linearity of the initial calibration is assessed using a linear 

regression algorithm, based on the intensity counts of both the 

target elements and the internal standards. Calculate the correlation 

coefficient (r2) from the initial calibration. The calibration is 

sufficiently linear if r2 ≥ 0.998. Elements not meeting this criterion 

are not valid and recalibration is required for at least those affected 

elements. 

10.3.4.3 The ongoing validity of the calibration is determined by the 

subsequent calibration verifications, which are performed at 

concentrations and frequencies as described in the next sections. 

10.3.5 Second-Source Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) 

10.3.5.1 An ICV standard (see Attachment 7) is analyzed immediately after 

the initial calibration. This is a standard obtained preferably from a 

different vendor than the standard used for calibration but at a 

minimum must be a different lot number from the same vendor. 

10.3.5.1.1 Acceptance Criteria: The ICV recovery must be within 

90-110%. Additionally, the internal standard recoveries 

must fall between 60-125% of true values. The ICV can 

be reanalyzed, but must be successful twice in 

succession or corrective action must be taken. 

10.3.5.1.2 Corrective Action: If the ICV results are outside of the 

acceptance limits, investigate the accuracy of the 

standards, correct as necessary, and recalibrate. 

10.3.6 Calibration Blank 

10.3.6.1 Checks for the memory effects described in Section 4.4 must be 

accomplished by analysis of an initial calibration blank (ICB) after 

the ICV. Continuing calibration blanks (CCBs) are analyzed 

immediately after each continuing calibration verification. 

10.3.6.1.1 Acceptance Criteria: Results for the calibration blanks 

must be less than the RL. 

10.3.6.1.2 Corrective Action: If the calibration blank exceeds 

acceptance limits, then the possibility of instrument 

contamination should be examined, particularly the 

possibility of carry-over from samples containing high 

solids. The blank can be reanalyzed, and if successful, 

analysis can continue. However, samples tested after 

high-level samples should be retested. If the reanalysis 

is not successful, then the analysis should be 

terminated. After the problem is corrected, recalibrate 

and reanalyze all samples tested since the last 

acceptable CCB. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 18 of 32

10.3.7 Reporting Limit (RL) Verification Standard 

10.3.7.1 A standard (such as the low level calibration standard) is analyzed 

after the ICB to monitor the lab’s ability to produce reliable results at 

the reporting limit concentrations. The RL verification standard is 

analyzed after the daily ICB. 

10.3.7.1.1 Acceptance Criteria: For project reporting limits at or 

above two times the MDL, the results should be within 

50% of the expected value. Some programs may 

require tighter control, in which case the RLs will need to 

be three or more times the MDL concentration. 

10.3.7.1.2 Corrective Action: If the RL verification fails to meet 

acceptance limits, data for the associated samples must 

be assessed. For example, if the results are high, 

consider blank contamination, and if the results are low, 

consider MDL verifications. At a minimum, sample 

results must be qualified in the final report. 

10.3.8 Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Standard 

10.3.8.1 A CCV standard (see Attachment 7) is analyzed after every set of 

ten samples and at the end of the analytical sequence. 

10.3.8.1.1 Acceptance Criteria: The CCV recovery must be within 

85-115%. In addition, the IS recovery must be within 60-

125%. If CCV results are not within these limits, the 

CCV can be reanalyzed, but it must be successful twice 

in succession or further corrective action must be taken. 

10.3.8.1.2 Corrective Action: If the CCV fails acceptance criteria, 

then the analysis should be terminated. Recalibrate and 

reanalyze all samples tested since the last acceptable 

CCV. 

10.4 Sample Analysis 

10.4.1 Report the average of at least three replicate integrations for all field and QC 

samples analyzed. 

10.4.2 Flush the system with a rinse solution between samples and standards during 

the analytical run. It is recommended that the rinse solution be the same as 

the matrix (i.e., 2% HNO3 and 0.5% HCl). If using a discreet analyzer or 

switching valve, the rinsing efficiency can be improved by rinsing the sample 

loop and valve as well as the sample line itself. Evaluate the effectiveness of 

this rinse and increase the flush time if needed. 

10.4.3 It may be valuable to monitor additional isotopes for elements that are 

potentially susceptible to interferences. In particular, monitoring additional 

isotopes for selenium may help data analysis. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 19 of 32

10.4.4 Where any target element is determined at a concentration exceeding the high 

calibration standard, those samples must be reanalyzed following dilution for at 

least those affected elements. The dilution factor must be sufficient to bring 

the target analyte to within the calibration range. 

10.4.5 The analytical run sequence should be performed as follows to meet all quality 

control criteria: 

Instrument initialization 

Warm-up 

Tune instrument 

Perform mass calibration, when indicated 

Perform resolution check, when indicated 

Validate tuning criteria 

Calibration blank 

Calibration standards 

ICV 

ICB 

RL verification standard 

Synthetic FGD matrix 

Spiked synthetic FGD matrix 

CCB (carryover check) 

CCV 

CCB 

10 Samples 

Ending CCV 

Ending CCB 

11.0 Calculations / Data Reduction

11.1 LCS Percent Recoveries are calculated according to the following equation: 

%ܴ ൌ ൬

݁ݑܸ݈ܽ ݊݀ݑ݋ܨ ܵܥܮ

100% ൈ ൰ ݁ݑܸ݈ܽ ݁ݑݎܶ ܵܥܮ

11.2 ICV Percent Recoveries are calculated according to the following equation: 

%ܴ ൌ ൬

݁ݑܸ݈ܽ ݊݀ݑ݋ܨ ܸܥܫ

100% ൈ ൰ ݁ݑܸ݈ܽ ݁ݑݎܶ ܸܥܫ

Repeat for all samples 

with 10% CCV/CCB 

frequency 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 20 of 32

11.3 CCV Percent Recoveries are calculated according to the following equation: 

%ܴ ൌ ൬

݁ݑܸ݈ܽ ݊݀ݑ݋ܨ ܸܥܥ

100% ൈ ൰ ݁ݑܸ݈ܽ ݁ݑݎܶ ܸܥܥ

11.4 Matrix Spike Recoveries are calculated according to the following equation: 

%ܴ ൌ ൬

ܴܵܵ െ ܴܵ

ܵܣ ൰ ൈ 100%

Where: 

SSR = Spike Sample Result

SR = Sample Result

SA = Spike Added 

NOTE: When the sample concentration is less than the detection limit, use SR 

= 0 for the purpose of calculating %R. 

11.5 The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) between sample duplicates is calculated 

according to the following equation: 

|ܷ2ܦ െ ܷ1ܦ| ൌ ܦܴܲ

1

ሻܷ2ܦ ൅ ܷ1ܦሺ 2

ൈ 100%

Where: 

DU1 = Sample result 

DU2 = Sample duplicate result 

11.6 The final concentration for an aqueous sample is calculated as follows: 

ൌ ݐ݈ݑݏܴ݁

ܥൈܸଵ ൈ ܦ

ܸଶ

Where: 

C = Concentration from instrument readout

D = Instrument dilution factor, where applicable

V1 = Final volume in milliliters after sample preparation

V2 = Initial volume of sample digested in milliliters

12.0 Method Performance 

12.1 Method Detection Limit Study (MDL) 

12.1.1 An initial method detection limit study must be performed on each instrument 

before samples can be analyzed. MDL studies are conducted annually per 

40CFR Part 136, Appendix B. A summary of this procedure is as follows: 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 21 of 32

12.1.1.1 Prepare seven replicate samples at three to five times the 

estimated MDL concentration. The MDL samples are prepared in 

the Synthetic FGD wastewater matrix. The Synthetic FGD matrix 

may be diluted if it has previously been determined that the field 

samples require dilution to meet method criteria; see Section 9.4. 

12.1.1.2 Prepare and analyze the MDL standards as described in 

Section 10, including the digestion procedure. 

12.1.1.3 Calculate the average concentration found in μg/L, and the 

standard deviation of the concentration(s) in μg/L, for each analyte. 

12.1.1.4 The MDL is calculated as Students t-value for the 99th percentile 

(3.143 for 7 replicates) times the standard deviation of the MDL 

replicate results, following the procedure at 40CFR Part 136, 

Appendix B. 

12.1.1.5 The calculated MDLs may not exceed the test concentrations used 

in the 7 samples nor may the test concentrations exceed the MDLs 

by more than a factor of 10. If either case is encountered, all 

elements affected must be prepared again at a more appropriate 

concentration. 

12.1.1.6 Some elements may not require spiking if it has previously been 

determined that the Synthetic FGD matrix is contaminated and 

meets the criteria in Section 9.4, and the concentrations of the 

contaminants are within the acceptable range described in Section 

12.1.1.5. 

12.1.2 Example MDLs are given in Attachment 10. 

12.1.2.1 NOTE 1: Perform the MDL study in the synthetic FGD wastewater 

matrix. Spiking this matrix provides detection limits that are better 

matched to the complex matrix typical of FGD wastewater. These 

limits can be significantly higher than those obtained in a reagent 

water matrix. In some cases (zinc in particular), the level of 

contamination in the synthetic FGD solution may be high enough to 

result in somewhat elevated MDLs. 

12.2 Instrument Detection Limit Study 

12.2.1 Instrument detection limit (IDL) studies are conducted quarterly for each 

instrument and each mass used for analysis. 

12.2.1.1 Prepare ten blanks. 

12.2.1.2 Analyze the IDL blanks on three non-consecutive days. 

12.2.1.3 The IDL is equal to three times the standard deviation of the blank 

results. 

12.3 Demonstration of Capabilities

12.3.1 All personnel are required to perform an initial demonstration of capability 

(IDOC) on the instrument they will be using for analysis prior to testing 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 22 of 32

samples. On-going proficiency must be demonstrated annually. IDOCs and 

on-going proficiency demonstrations are conducted as follows. 

12.3.2 Analyst Instrument Proficiency - Four aliquots of the ICV are analyzed using 

the same instrumental conditions and procedures used to analyze samples. 

The analyst must employ ICVs from four distinct analytical sequences. Using 

these four ICVs demonstrates the analyst’s ability to optimize and calibrate the 

instrument and to prepare analytical solutions. Calculate the average recovery 

and standard deviation of the recovery for each analyte of interest. 

12.3.2.1 If any analyte does not meet the acceptance criteria, (85-115% 

recovery, unless other criteria are established) the test must be 

repeated. Only those analytes that did not meet criteria in the first 

test need to be evaluated. 

12.3.2.2 Repeated failure for any analyte indicates the need for the 

laboratory to evaluate the analytical procedure and take corrective 

action. 

12.3.3 Analyst Preparation Proficiency 

12.3.3.1 Each analyst performing the method must complete a 

demonstration of capability (DOC) by successfully preparing and/or 

analyzing four consecutive LCSs, or a blind performance evaluation 

(PE) sample, or other acceptable QC samples. 

12.3.3.2 Analysts who continue to perform the method must successfully 

complete a demonstration of capability annually. 

13.0 Pollution Control 

13.1 For information about pollution prevention that may be applicable to laboratory 

operations, consult “Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste 

Reduction” available from the American Chemical Society’s Department of 

Government Relations and Science Policy, 1155 16th Street N.W., Washington, D.C., 

20036, or online at http://www.ups.edu/x7432.xml. 

14.0 Waste Management

14.1 All waste must be disposed of in accordance with Federal, State, and local 

regulations. 

15.0 References / Cross-References

15.1 EPA Method 200.8, “Determination of Trace Elements in Waters and Wastes by 

Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry”, Revision 5.4, EMMC Version. 

15.2 EPA Method 1638, “Determination of Trace Elements in Ambient Waters by 

Inductively Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometry, January 1996. 

15.3 This method was developed by PerkinElmer, Inc. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 23 of 32

16.0 Attachments

Attachment 1: Suggested Mass Choices 

Attachment 2: Recommended Elemental Equations 

Attachment 3: Internal Standards and Corresponding Elements 

Attachment 4: Tuning Solution 

Attachment 5: Suggested Tuning and Response Factor Criteria 

Attachment 6: Dual Detector Calibration Solution 

Attachment 7: Calibration, Calibration Verification, and Spike Concentrations 

Attachment 8: Summary of Quality Control Requirements 

Attachment 9: Typical results for synthetic FGD solutions 

Attachment 10: Typical Method Detection Limits 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 24 of 32

Attachment 1: Suggested Mass Choices and Analysis Mode 

The isotope in bold is recommended as the most appropriate mass for quantitation. Additional 

masses listed are recommended for use as confirmation and to monitor for interferences. 

STD – Standard mode 

He – Helium gas used in collision mode 

NH3 – Ammonia gas used in reaction mode 

Mass Element of 

Interest 

Analysis 

Mode 

27 Aluminum STD or He 

75 Arsenic He 

111, 114 Cadmium He 

52, 53 Chromium NH3 or He 

63, 65 Copper He 

208, 207, 206 Lead STD 

55 Manganese NH3 or STD 

60, 62 Nickel He 

78, 82 Selenium NH3 or He 

107 Silver STD or He 

205, 203 Thallium STD or He 

51 Vanadium NH3 or He 

66 Zinc He 

NOTE: It is strongly recommended that elements other than those of interest be 

monitored to indicate other potential molecular interferences which could 

affect the data quality. 

Na, Mg, K, Ca and Fe are included in the synthetic FGD wastewater but 

their analytical determination is optional 

Attachment 2: Recommended Elemental Equations 

Element 

Isobaric 

Correction Mathematical Equation 

Pb None ሺ1.0000ሻሺ208ܯሻ ൅ ሺ1.0000ሻሺ207ܯሻ

൅ ሺ1.0000ሻሺ206ܯሻ

6

Li Li (natural) ሺ1.0000ሻሺ6ܯሻ െ ሺ0.0813ሻሺ7ܯሻ

In Sn ሺ1.0000ሻሺ115ܯሻ െ ሺ0.0149ሻሺ118ܯሻ
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 25 of 32

The 6Li correction equation is only needed if 6Li is used as an internal standard for low mass 

elements. 

Attachment 3: Internal Standards and Corresponding Elements 

Internal Std. Associated elements1,2

Sc Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca 

Ge Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Cd 

In V, Cr, Mn, Ag 

In or Tb Tl, Pb 

Footnotes: 

(1) Na, Mg, K, Ca and Fe are included in the synthetic FGD wastewater but their analytical 

determination is optional – the interferences caused by these elements are more 

important than the determination of their exact concentration. 

(2) Other internal standards may be used. For example, 6

Li, Ga, Rh, Bi, Ho, and Ir may be 

considered for use as internal standards. 

 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 26 of 32

Attachment 4: Tuning Solution 

A tuning solution containing elements representing all of the mass regions of interest must be 

analyzed. Below is a suggested solution covering a typical mass range for the NexION 300D. 

Instrument manufacturer recommendations should be followed for tuning solutions. 

Attachment 5: Suggested Tuning and Response Factor Criteria 

No Gas Mode 

Mg24 >20,000cps 

In115 >50,000cps 

U238 >40,000cps 

Background220 <1cps 

CeO/Ce 156/140 <2.5% 

Ce++/Ce+ 70/140 <3% 

Element Concentration (g/L) 

Be 1 

Ce 1 

Fe 1 

In 1 

Li 1 

Mg 1 

Pb 1 

U 1 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 27 of 32

Attachment 6: Dual Detector Calibration Solution 

A dual detector calibration solution containing elements representing all of the mass regions of 

interest must be analyzed. Below is a suggested solution covering a typical mass calibration 

range. Other elements can be added as needed. The concentrations used in the solution may be 

varied as necessary to accommodate the dual detector algorithms and the instrument sensitivity. 

Instrument manufacturer recommendations should be followed for tuning solutions. 

 

Element Concentration (g/L) 

Ag 200 

Al 200 

As 200 

Ca 200 

Cd 200 

Cr 200 

Cu 200 

Ge 200 

In 200 

K 200 

Mg 200 

Mn 200 

Na 200 

Ni 200 

Pb 200 

Sc 200 

Se 200 

Tb 200 

Tl 200 

V 200 

Zn 200 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 28 of 32

Attachment 7: Calibration, Calibration Verification, and Spike Concentrations 

Element 

Initial Calibration 

(g/L) 

ICV 

(g/L) 

CCV 

(g/L) 

LCS 

(g/L) 

MS/MSD 

(g/L) 

Aluminum 100, 1,000, 10,000 4000 5000 4000 4000 

Arsenic 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Cadmium 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Chromium 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Copper 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Lead 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Manganese 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 * 

Nickel 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Selenium 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 * 

Silver 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Thallium 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Vanadium 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Zinc 1, 10, 100 40 50 40 40 

Additional elements may be included in the calibration solution at the above levels. 

* Levels may be adjusted to meet specific requirements – in particular, higher spiking levels for 

selenium and manganese may be needed to be able to reliably determine the spike above the 

sample concentration. 

NOTE: The concentrations of elements in this table are intended to be the approximate 

concentrations supplied to the plasma. When the internal standards are added on-line through 

the use of a mixing tee, these concentrations should not be affected significantly. However, if it is 

determined that sample dilution is necessary to meet method criteria and this dilution is to be 

effected through the use of on-line dilutions with a mixing tee, the concentrations of the calibration 

standards and QC samples must be adjusted accordingly. In such cases, Ag may become 

unstable at higher dilutions and lower concentrations may be necessary. 

 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 29 of 32

Attachment 8: Summary of Quality Control Requirements 

QC Parameter Frequency Acceptance Criteria Corrective Action 

ICV/QCS Beginning of every 

analytical run. 

90 - 110% recovery 

IS, 60-125% recovery 

Terminate analysis; correct 

the problem; recalibrate. 

ICB/CCB Immediately after 

each ICV. 

Result is < RL 

IS, 60-125% recovery 

Terminate analysis; correct 

the problem; recalibrate. 

Synthetic FGD 

interference 

check 

Prior to initiating 

analysis and at least 

quarterly. 

Result for target 

elements is < RL, 

unless actual presence 

of target element can be 

demonstrated, in which 

case result is 

< 5X RL. 

IS 60-125% recovery 

Correct the problem prior to 

sample analysis. 

Individual element 

interference 

checks 

Prior to initiating 

analysis and at least 

quarterly. 

Result for target 

elements is < RL, 

unless actual presence 

of target element can be 

demonstrated, in which 

case result is 

< 5X RL. 

IS 60-125% recovery 

Correct the problem prior to 

sample analysis. 

CCV Beginning and end 

of run and every 10 

samples OR every 2 

hours, whichever is 

more frequent. 

Beginning and end 

of each analytical 

sequence. 

85 - 115% recovery 

IS, 60-125% recovery 

If unacceptable, terminate 

analysis; correct the 

problem; recalibrate the 

instrument, re-verify 

calibration and rerun all 

samples since the last 

acceptable CCV. 

CCB Immediately 

following each CCV. 

The result must be 

< RL 

IS, 60-125% of intensity 

in calibration blank 

If unacceptable, terminate 

analysis; correct the 

problem, recalibrate the 

instrument, re-verify 

calibration and rerun all 

samples since the last 

acceptable CCB. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 30 of 32

Attachment 8: Summary of Quality Control Requirements (continued) 

QC Parameter Frequency Acceptance Criteria Corrective Action 

Method 

Blank/Laboratory 

Reagent Blank 

One per batch of 20 

field samples or 

fewer. 

The result must be less 

than the RL. 

Sample results greater 

than 10x the blank 

concentration or 

samples for which the 

contaminant is < RL, do 

not require re-digestion 

or reanalysis. 

Re-run once. If > than the 

RL, re-digest and reanalyze 

samples. 

Note exceptions under 

criteria section. 

See Section 9.4 for 

additional requirements. 

LCS/LFB One per preparation 

batch of 20 samples 

or fewer 

Not to exceed 85-115% 

recovery 

See Section 9.5 

Matrix 

Spike/Laboratory 

Fortified Matrix 

One every ten 

samples or fewer. 

Must be within 

laboratory control limits. 

See Section 9.6 for 

additional requirements. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

Page No.: 31 of 32

Attachment 9: Typical results for the synthetic FGD solution 

Analyte Synthetic FGD solution A 

(g/L)

Synthetic FGD 

solution B 

(g/L)

Synthetic FGD 

solution C 

(g/L)

Synthetic FGD 

solution D 

(g/L)

Synthetic FGD 

solution E 

(g/L)

Synthetic FGD 

solution F 

(g/L)

S

27 Al 23.2 36.4 23.5 5.33 7.16 24.4 

51 V 0.46 5.11 0.45 4.31 0.19 0.15 

52 Cr 106 2.97 1.76 0.76 1.38 2.02 

55 Mn 45.2 37.3 21.9 25.4 7.02 21.9 

60 Ni 2.83 4.36 4.66 7.44 1.42 4.62 

63 Cu 3.45 2.35 3.56 1.78 3.03 1.34 

66 Zn 7.24 5.84 40.4 27.6 9.26 36.6 75 As 4.90 1.11 1.82 2.88 1.09 1.69 

78 Se 10.6 3.10 4.00 4.21 3.04 6.48 

107 Ag 0.53 0.22 1.36 2.33 0.31 0.02 

111 Cd 1.00 3.25 2.85 3.92 0.11 1.93 

205 Tl 0.31 0.19 1.28 0.94 0.05 0.10 

208 Pb 2.05 1.36 5.30 9.23 5.37 4.17 

Note that these values are examples and not method requirements. Synthetic FGD solution F was spiked with 40 ug/L of all elements. 
 Office of Water (4303T) DRAFT 

 Washington, DC 20460 March 2013 

 

Page No.: 32 of 32

Attachment 10: Typical Method Detection Limits 

Mass/Element 

Int. Time 

(sec) Mode 

Internal 

Standard MDL (μg/L) 

27 Al 0.5 STD Sc 0.54 

51 V 0.5 NH3 In 0.02 

52 Cr 0.5 NH3 In 0.09 

55 Mn 0.5 NH3 In 0.27 

60 Ni 0.5 He Ge 0.28 

63 Cu 0.5 He Ge 0.30 

66 Zn 0.5 He Ge 1.20 

75 As 1.5 He Ge 0.30 

78 Se 1.5 He Ge 1.01 

107 Ag 0.5 STD In 0.03 

111 Cd 0.5 He Ge 0.03 

205 Tl 0.5 STD In 0.01 

208 Pb 0.5 STD In 0.04 

MDLs were determined in the synthetic FGD solution. Note that these values are examples, and 

not method requirements. 

It should be noted that contamination present in the synthetic FGD solution may have a 

significant impact on the determination of MDL values. It may be impractical to spike the 

synthetic FGD solution for those elements that are already present at concentrations exceeding 

the 3-5 times estimated MDL value. It may also be problematic to determine an acceptable MDL 

for any element present in the synthetic FGD at a concentration that exceeds 10 times the 

calculated MDL.