alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 16 June 2005

in Joined Cases C-462/03 and C-463/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt Strabag AG, Kostmann GmbH v Österreichische Bundesbahnen (1)

(Public procurement contracts - Directive 93/38/EEC - Water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors - Concepts of ‘operation’ and ‘provision’ of networks providing a service to the public in the field of transport by railway - Railway infrastructure works)

(2005/C 193/08)

Language of the case: German

In Joined Cases C-462/03 and C-463/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria), made by decision of 27 October 2003, received at the Court on 4 November 2003, in the proceedings pending before that court between Strabag AG (C-462/03), Kostmann GmbH (C-463/03) and Österreichische Bundesbahnen — the Court (Second Chamber) composed of C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen, G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Where a contracting entity exercising one of the activities particularly mentioned in Article 2(2) of Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors contemplates, in the exercise of that activity, the award of a supply, works or service contract or the organisation of a design contest, that contract or contest is governed by the provisions of this directive.

----

(1)OJ C 21 of 24.1.2004.

----
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 18-1412 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

JOHN SILVIA, JR., 

a/k/a JOHN SILVIA, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion of this Court issued on March 20, 2020 is amended 

as follows: 

On page 7, line 14, replace "Loc. R. 27(c)" with "Loc. R. 

27.0(c)"
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
PIER ACQUISITION II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip J. Huml, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Philip J. HumlPhilip
      J. HumlPrincipal
      Financial OfficerNovember
      13, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Charles Camorata, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Mainstream Entertainment, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Mainstream Entertainment, Inc.  Date: January 30, 2012  By:/s/ Charles Camorata Charles Camorata Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  1
#### John CHLIPALA and Helen Chlipala, His Wife, v. A. A. MORRISON & COMPANY, Inc., appellant.

No. 8120.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Dec. 23, 1942.

Decided Dec. 30, 1942.

Frank M. Walsh, of Scranton, Pa., for appellant.

Joseph T. McDonald, of Scranton, Pa. (Carl J. Burke, of Pittston, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before BIGGS, MARIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Watson, 44 F.Supp. 894.
Sherry COY, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

WD 82159

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 30, 2019

Sherry Coy, St. Joseph, MO, Appellant Acting Pro Se.

Larry Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

*329Sherry Coy appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her application for unemployment compensation benefits based on a finding that she had been discharged for misconduct connected to her work. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
**CERTIFICATIONS**
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, David G. Mazzella, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc. 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: May 13, 2005 By:  /s/ David G. Mazzella          David G. Mazzella    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
23
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SATUSA CORPORATION (the
"Company") for the year ended August 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin Nichols, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date: December 20, 2017                By: /s/ Kevin Nichols
                                           -----------------
                                              Kevin Nichols
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES WILLIAM LYNCH, III,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 675 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
1 Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Ora V. Marek-Martinez <oramm@navajo-nsn.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:03 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation for McElmo Creek Unit Flare

Hello,

Thank you for the notification. I apologize for not responding sooner, however, I was out of the office. Incidentally, I

have an all

‐ day meeting today, would you have time to discuss this project on Friday around 10am?

Best,

Ora

Ora Marek

‐ Martinez, PhD

Navajo Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

Historic Preservation Department

PO Box 4950

Window Rock, AZ 86515

Ph: (928) 871

‐ 7198

Fx: (928) 871

‐ 7886

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:33 PM

To: Tamara Billie; Ora V. Marek

‐ Martinez; Timothy Begay

Cc: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: NHPA Consultation for McElmo Creek Unit Flare

Good Afternoon,

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 is processing a federal Clean Air Act air

quality permit for the McElmo Creek Unit (MCU) Flare. The undertaking triggering consultation under the

National Historic Preservation (NHPA) is the issuance of this Clean Air Act permit. The EPA is the lead federal

agency, and only agency, involved in this undertaking.

Other than the potential installation of a variable speed fan on the Flare, EPA’s undertaking does not authorize

any new construction or modification of existing equipment at the MCU Facility. The undertaking results in no

new surface disturbance or change in operations and therefore will have no effect on eligible historic

properties located within 2 km area of potential effects for the Flare.

I would appreciate talking to you this week or early next week about this action before sending you official

documentation to initiate the NHPA consultation. Please let me know if you are available at the following

times to discuss this action:2 10:00 am MST, Thurs, 9/3

10:00 am MST, Fri, 9/4

10:00 am MST, Mon, 9/7

10:00 am MST, Tues, 9/8

I look forward to your response.

Thank you.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR

‐ 3)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415

‐ 947

‐ 4156

Fax: 415

‐ 947

‐ 3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,947]


Philip Morris USA, Cabarrus Manufacturing Plant, a Subsidiary of 
Altria Group, Inc.; Concord, NC; Notice of Affirmative Determination 
Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated February 19, 2009, the petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on 
February 6, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the 
Federal Register on March 3, 2009 (74 FR 9283).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of cigarettes did not contribute 
importantly to worker separations at the subject firm. The 
investigation revealed that the subject firm shifted production of 
cigarettes to foreign countries during the period under investigation. 
However, these products were not likely to be imported back to the 
United States.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information regarding a shift in production of cigarettes to 
Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, and Mexico.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7104 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned officers of Tiga Energy Services, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to their knowledge:





1. the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Tiga Energy Services, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tiga Energy Services, Inc.





Date: April 19, 2011
By:

/s/ Michael HathawayName:

Michael HathawayTitle:

Chief Executive Officer Principal Executive Officer





Date: April 19, 2011
By:

/s/ Michael NoonanName:

Michael NoonanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
John Charles LEWIS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 28, 2018

John Charles Lewis, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED. *See**Banks v. State* , 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) ; *Baldwin v. Crosby* , 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (concluding "proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking [removal of lien and restoration of funds collected], secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any final order in the proceedings below").

Wetherell, Rowe, and Jay, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63)]
[Notices]               
[Page 16894]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02ap10-134]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6910]

 
Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy; Notice of 
Open Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy (ACIEP) 
will meet from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. on Thursday, April 15, 2010, at the 
U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Room 1107, Washington, 
DC. The meeting will be hosted by the Assistant Secretary of State for 
Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs Jose W. Fernandez and Committee 
Chair Ted Kassinger. The ACIEP serves the U.S. Government in a solely 
advisory capacity, and provides advice concerning issues and challenges 
in international economic policy. The meeting will focus on key 
economic and commercial priorities for the Department. Subcommittee 
reports and discussions will be led by the Economic Empowerment in 
Strategic Regions Subcommittee, the Economic Sanctions Subcommittee, 
and the Investment Subcommittee.
    This meeting is open to public participation, though seating is 
limited. Entry to the building is controlled; to obtain pre-clearance 
for entry, members of the public planning to attend should provide, by 
Monday, April 12, their name, professional affiliation, valid 
government-issued ID number (i.e., U.S. Government ID [agency], U.S. 
military ID [branch], passport [country], or drivers license [state]), 
date of birth, and citizenship to Sherry Booth by fax (202) 647-5936, 
e-mail (Boothsl@state.gov), or telephone (202) 647-0847. One of the 
following forms of valid photo identification will be required for 
admission to the State Department building: U.S. driver's license, U. 
S. Government identification card, or any valid passport. Enter the 
Department of State from the C Street lobby. In view of escorting 
requirements, non-Government attendees should plan to arrive 15 minutes 
before the meeting begins. Requests for reasonable accommodation should 
be made to Sherry Booth prior to Thursday, April 8th. Requests made 
after that date will be considered, but might not be possible to 
fulfill.
    For additional information, contact Senior Coordinator Nancy Smith-
Nissley, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy, 
Bureau of Economic, Energy and Business Affairs, at (202) 647-1682 or 
Smith-NissleyN@state.gov.

    Dated: March 29, 2010.
Sandra E. Clark,
Office Director, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public 
Diplomacy, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-7477 Filed 4-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
```
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Edward J. Peplinski, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ehouse Global, Inc., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ehouse Global, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  a) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  b) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I, as the certifying officer have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date: April 12, 2013  By: /s/ Edward J. Peplinski Edward J. Peplinski Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer