alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF TRM CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, I, Kenneth L. Tepper, Chief Executive Officer of TRM Corporation (the Company),
hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated:  May 16, 2005
    /s/ Kenneth L. TepperKenneth L. TepperChief Executive Officer 28
James Donte WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1348

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# AGENCY:

Pacific Air Forces, Department of the Air Force.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of a record of decision.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Air Force signed the Record of Decision for the F-35A Operational Beddown—Pacific, for the Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement on December 19, 2017. The Record of Decision reflects the Air Force decision to implement the three Proposed Action Alternatives: provide additional stormwater runoff control; develop equipment and material laydown areas; and provide additional heat, water, and power to the South Loop.

                        The decision was based on matters discussed in the F-35A Operational Beddown—Pacific, Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, contributions from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement was made available to the public on October 6, 2017 through a Notice of Availability published in the                         **Federal Register**                         (82 FR 46808) with a 30-day wait period that ended on November 6, 2017.                    

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:**                         Mr. Hamid Kamalpour, AFCEC/CZN, 2261 Hughes Ave, Ste 155, JBSA Lackland, TX 78236, ph: 210-925-2738.                    

*Authority:*                         This Notice of Availability is published pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321,                         *et seq.*) and the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (32 CFR parts 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).                    

Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-00458 Filed 1-11-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
# Europeiska unionens C 218A/6 se

| | ISSN 1725-2504 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 218A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 48 årgången6 september 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2504

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 218A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

48 årgången6 september 2005

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Upplysningar |
| | Kommissionen |
| 2005/C 218A/1 | Utlysning av en tjänst som direktör — (lönegrad A*14) (artikel 29.2 i tjänsteföreskrifterna) — KOM(2005) 10003 | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

III   Upplysningar

Kommissionen

2005/C 218A/1

Utlysning av en tjänst som direktör — (lönegrad A*14) (artikel 29.2 i tjänsteföreskrifterna) — KOM(2005) 10003

1

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

III Upplysningar

Kommissionen

| 6.9.2005 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 218/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2005

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 218/1

---

Utlysning av en tjänst som

DIREKTÖR

(lönegrad A*14)

(artikel 29.2 i tjänsteföreskrifterna)

KOM(2005) 10003

(2005/C 218 A/01)

Kommissionen söker en direktör till Institutet för konsumenthälsa och konsumentskydd vid Gemensamma forskningscentret i Ispra (Italien).

Utförlig befattningsbeskrivning, urvalskriterier och anvisningar för hur man söker tjänsten finns på

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Innehavaren av tjänsten kommer att väljas ut och tillsättas av kommissionen i enlighet med dess urvals- och rekryteringsförfaranden. Löne- och anställningsvillkor är de som enligt tjänsteföreskrifterna gäller för tjänstemän i lönegrad A*14 vid Europeiska gemenskaperna. Kommissionen för en personalpolitik för lika möjligheter.

Sökande till tjänsten måste vara medborgare i någon av Europeiska unionens medlemsstater, ha en universitets- eller högskoleexamen som ger tillträde till doktorandstudier, minst 15 års yrkeserfarenhet efter avslutad utbildning på en nivå till vilken ovannämnda kvalifikationer ger tillträde varav minst fem år i ledande ställning, djupgående kunskaper i ett av Europeiska unionens officiella språk samt tillräckliga kunskaper i ytterligare ett av dessa språk.

Sökande till tjänsten måste anmäla sig via Internet på webbplatsen

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html

och följa anvisningarna för de olika etapperna i förfarandet. Observera att sökande till tjänsten måste ha en e-postadress för att kunna anmäla sig.

Sista anmälningsdag är den 6 oktober 2005. Online-anmälningar skall göras senast klockan 12.00 (lokal tid i Bryssel).

---
Exhibit 23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 
 CompuCredit Holdings Corporation
 Atlanta, Georgia
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-4 (No. 333-159456), and Form S-8 (No. 333-150988-99, 333-117960-99, 333-117959-99 and 333-62012-99) of CompuCredit Holdings Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
 /s/ BDO USA, LLP
 Atlanta, Georgia
 March 3, 2011
Derek Lamar MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert E. Wildridge, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Derek Murray appeals his convictions for aggravated battery with great bodily harm and simple battery. We affirm the convictions without further discussion but reverse the order for reimbursement of investigation costs to the Osceola County Sheriff's Office because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order while this appeal was pending.

Section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2016), provides in pertinent part that in all criminal cases, the court shall include in every judgment rendered against the convicted person the investigative costs incurred by law enforcement agencies, if requested by such agencies. Here, Murray disputed the amount of the investigative costs that were being requested by the Osceola County Sheriff's Office. As a result, the trial court announced at the sentencing hearing that it assessed investigative costs against Murray, but was reserving jurisdiction to determine at a later hearing the specific amount of these costs. Shortly thereafter, Murray filed the instant appeal. Subsequently, the trial court held the aforementioned hearing and entered the now-challenged order imposing investigative costs against Murray.

While the trial court properly reserved jurisdiction at the sentencing hearing to impose these investigative costs, the court was thereafter without jurisdiction to enter an order determining the amount while *488this direct appeal was pending. *See**Gatlin v. State* , 618 So.2d 765, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (holding that although the trial court reserved jurisdiction at sentencing to consider imposing costs for police investigation, when the court actually ordered those costs it was without jurisdiction to do so because the defendant had already timely filed his notice of appeal). The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, the September 15, 2017 order for reimbursement of investigation costs entered by the trial court during this appeal is a nullity.

CONVICTIONS AND SENTENCES AFFIRMED. ORDER FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF INVESTIGATION COSTS REVERSED, without prejudice.1

COHEN, C.J., BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

1

The trial court may enter a separate order for reimbursement of investigation costs once jurisdiction is returned to it following the issuance of our mandate.
Exhibit 32.1








CELSION CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE § 1350








The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of Celsion Corporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November 10, 2009


/s/ Michael H. Tardugno


Michael H. Tardugno


Chief Executive Officer








November 10, 2009


/s/ Sean Moran


Sean Moran


Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National 8usiness Aircr;lft Association Eli Cotti 21812010

----

I{egionill AirlillC Association I Da~'c l.ot/Cl'cr 2/812010

I ---

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Associatio/l Robert Ha{~kJIlan 2/812010

I ~

,

AT':'\' !\1 LOI)CZ 2/812010 ~
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sealy Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 1, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lawrence J. Rogers, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and Jeffrey C. Ackerman, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



July 8,
2008

| |  |                                                                                    
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/LAWRENCE J. ROGERS                                                              
| |  | Lawrence J. Rogers                                                                 
| |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer                                                    
| |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                      
| |  |                                                                                    
| |  | /s/JEFFREY C. ACKERMAN                                                             
| |  | Jeffrey C. Ackerman                                                                
| |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

---



QuickLinks
James Leslie KELLY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5093

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 08, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,018,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  772,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                   153,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,744,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,040,338
<PP&E>                                       3,290,214
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,434,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,542,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,129,331
<BONDS>                                     97,447,810
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,500
<COMMON>                                       811,015
<OTHER-SE>                                (92,710,635)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,542,916
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,504,745
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,395,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               238,040
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,868,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,126,240)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,126,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,126,240)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 61 (Wednesday, April 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-863-000]


Smart Papers Holdings, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

March 25, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Smart Papers Holdings, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 14, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3959681909cbdbfbabdb680a6a3a3bca1a793b5b6a1b0fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="084e4d5a4b47666461666d5b7d7878677a7c486e6d7a6b266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>. 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-7239 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Armando de Armas CARABALLO, Appellant, v. JEROME INTERNATIONAL S.A., Marand RE S.A., Martin Antonio de Armas Silva, and Andres de Armas Silva, Appellees.

No. 3D17-659

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Green Paper — Defence procurement

(COM(2004) 608 final)

(2005/C 221/12)

On 23 September 2004 the Commission decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the Green paper — Defence procurement.

The European Economic and Social Committee instructed its Section for the Single Market, Production and Consumption to prepare its work on this subject.

In view of the urgent nature of the work, the EESC appointed Mr Wilkinson as rapporteur-general at its 414th plenary session (meeting of 9 February 2005). At this same meeting the EESC adopted the following opinion, by 96 votes with 9 abstentions:

1.   Introduction

2.   General comments

3.   Specific comments

3.2   Article 296

3.3   Publication of calls for tender

3.4   Dual use

3.5   European Defence Agency (EDA)

4.   Conclusions

Brussels, 9 February 2005.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)  OJEC C10/1 of 14.1.2004

(2)  EDA has four agreed functions; defence capabilities development, armaments cooperation, the European defence technological and industrial base and defence equipment market and research and technology.

(3)  As we commented in our opinion on COM(2003) 113 final, this combined EU spending is about 40 % that of the US, yet only produces about 10 % of the operational capabilities.

(4)  For example, the Committee notes the recent (September 2004) statement by the head of the EDA that EU forces are not well adapted to the modern world and its conflicts and threats; he spoke of the need to acquire more high technology equipment.

(5)  Such as OCCAR, Western European Armemnets group (WEAG) and Letter of Intent (LoI) countries.

(6)  OCCAR is a joint organisation for armaments cooperation to which 5 MS currently belong.

(7)  However, because of the specific nature of defence markets and because of the need to manage payments as part of national financial arrangements, MS will inevitably play a role in facilitating the development of defence equipment.

(8)  The decisions in the ‘Bremen case’ (1999/763/63(OJ L 301/8 of 24 November 1999) and the ‘Koninklijke Schelde Groep’ (OJ L 14/56 of 21 January 2003) are examples of the current lack of clarity.

(9)  We should note that even apparently simple equipment such as clothing can involve advanced technology.

(10)  See paragraph 5 of the opinion refered to at footnote 1.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 731 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 731

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 5, 2023.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF THE FRANK BEFORE A PRIMARY OR GENERAL 
              ELECTION.

    (a) In General.--Clause 8 of rule XXIV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by striking ``less than 90 days before the date of a 
primary or general election (whether regular, special, or runoff) in which such 
individual is a candidate for public office'' and inserting ``on a date during 
the period described in section 3210(a)(6)(A) of such title''.
    (b) House Communications Standards Commission Regulations and Guidance.--Not 
later than 30 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution--
            (1) the House Communications Standards Commission shall update any 
        relevant regulation or guidance to reflect the amendment made by 
        subsection (a); and
            (2) the Committee on House Administration shall make publicly 
        available on the website of the Committee any such regulation or 
        guidance updated under paragraph (1).

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO JURISDICTION OF COMMITTEE ON HOUSE 
              ADMINISTRATION.

    Clause 1(k)(7) of rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives is 
amended by striking ``Franking Commission'' and inserting ``House Communications 
Standards Commission''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```