alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mirna HERNANDEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. MONTEMAR INVESTMENT LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0140

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/
Anthony W. ThompsonAnthony W. ThompsonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
City Hall 

501 Laurel Street 

Brainerd, Minnesota 56401 

BRAINERD 

www.ci.brainerd.mn.us 

Mayor 

(218) 828-2308 

Fax (218) 828-2316 

City Administrator 

(218) 828-2307 

Fax (218) 828-2316 

adinin@ci.brainerd.mn.us 

ClviiAUomey 

411 Front Street 

P.O. Box-367 

(218) 828-2775 

Fax(218)829-9768 

Criminal A«orney 

510 Norwood Street 

(218) 828-2311 

Fax(218)825-8922 

City Engineer 

(218) 828-2309 

Fax(218)828-2316 

englneer@ci.brainerd.mn.us 

Chief of Pollee 

225 East River Road 

(218) 829-2805 

Fax (218) 825-3489 

Fire Chief 

23 Laurel Street 

(218) 828-2312 

Fax(218)828-2331 

fire@ci.brainerd.mn.us 

City Planner 

(218) 828-2310 

Fax(218)828-2316 

planning@ci.brainerd.mn.us 

Director of Parka & Recreation 

1619 Washington Street N.E. 

(218) 828-2320 

Fax (218) 828-2791 

parks@cl.brainerd.mn.us 

Public Utilities 

P.O. Box 373 

(218) 829-8726 ~ • fax (218) 829-4703 

(218) 829-2193 ~ • fax (218) 829-2308 

email@bpu.org 

Equal Opportunity Employer 

ft \.l Printed on Recycled Paper 

·Paper and Printing. Produced LOq(JIIY 

August 13, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany and Mr. Brian Swanson 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Dear Gentlemen, 

l'' 

u~ ib 

Please acknowledge that I am in full support of having Sky West be the airline 

serving our Brainerd Lakes Regional Airport. Without a doubt, our Brainerd 

Lakes Area is truly in need of a full service plane that can accommodate not 

only passengers but also the need for cargo capacity to bring their luggage, 

golf and hockey gear for recreation in this area that we call "God's Country". 

This area is very dependent on the tourism trade and not being able to have 

complete air service to the many resorts, hotels and private lake homes in this 

area could create a financial hardship. 

Having lived in Brainerd all of my life, serving on the Brainerd City Council 

and now as Mayor of our wonderful city for the past 35 years, I have seen 

and realize just how extremely important reliable and good air service is 

needed to keep this area vibrant and healthy. 

My sincere and heartfelt thanks for your consideration to this request!! 

Sincerely, 

City of Brainerd 

~a:~· 

James E. Wallin 

Mayor 

cc: Interim Airport Manager Rick Adair 

City Council
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,305]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Samuel Steel Pickling Company, Twinsburg, Ohio.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7145 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 21, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 127654 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 127654 

 COA: 257494 

Delta CC: 03-006994-FH 

ROBERT JON JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 5, 2004 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Delta Circuit Court for a 

determination of whether defendant is indigent and, if so, for the appointment of 

appellate counsel, in light of Halbert v Michigan, 545 US ___; 125 S Ct 2582; 162 L Ed 

2d 552 (2005). Appointed counsel may file an application for leave to appeal with the 

Court of Appeals, and/or any appropriate post-conviction motions in the trial court, 

within 12 months of the date of the Circuit Court’s order appointing counsel, in accord 

with the deadlines in effect at the time defendant was denied counsel. See MCR 

7.205(F)(3), MCR 6.311, and MCR 6.429. Counsel may, but is not required to, include 

those issues defendant raised in his application for leave to appeal to this Court. In all 

other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

CORRIGAN, J., would deny leave to appeal. 

p0914 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 21, 2005
 

Clerk
<PAGE>
DAUGHERTY RESOURCES, INC.                                             EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(United States Dollars)
Unaudited

The table below presents information necessary for the computation of earnings
or loss per share of common stock, on both a primary and filly diluted basis,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998. The computations below reflect the 1 for 5
Reverse Stock Split effective June 30, 1999.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      For the nine months
                                                      -------------------
                                                      Ended September 30,                   For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                      -------------------                   --------------------------------

                                                      2001             2000             2000             1999              1998
                                                      ----             ----             ----             ----              ----

<S>                                             <C>              <C>                 <C>              <C>              <C>
Net income (loss) applicable to share
of Common Stock and Common
Stock Equivalents                               $   (190,742)    $   (184,489)       $   (251,572)    $ (7,220,920)    $ (1,568,348)


Average number of shares of
Common Stock Outstanding                           3,742,724        2,222,172           2,957,366        2,261,754        2,035,188


Common Stock equivalents*                          6,262,420        6,116,031           6,016,729        5,933,586        1,725,960
                                                ------------     ------------        ------------     ------------     ------------


Total shares of Common Stock and
Common Stock equivalents                          10,005,144        8,338,203           8,974,095        8,195,340        3,761,148
                                                ============     ============        ============     ============     ============

Primary income (loss) per share of
Common Stock                                    $      (0.05)    $      (0.08)       $      (0.09)    $      (3.19)    $      (0.77)
                                                ============     ============        ============     ============     ============


Fully diluted income (loss) per share
of Common Stock*                                $      (0.05)    $      (0.08)       $      (0.09)    $      (3.19)    $      (0.77)
                                                ============     ============        ============     ============     ============

</TABLE>


*Common Stock equivalents are considered anti-dilutive in loss years.
1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1281

___________ Daniel R. Baird, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 6, 2007 Filed: April 10, 2007

___________ Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Daniel R. Baird appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action for relocation bene fits from his employer. Having carefully reviewed the record and th e parties’ briefs, we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See K.C.1986 Ltd. P’ship v. Reade Mfg. , 472 F.3d 1009, 1019-20 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo review). Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Baird’s pending motions.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,007
<PP&E>                                       2,598,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,583,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,071,204
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       277,791
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,921,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,583,233
<SALES>                                        161,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,298
<CGS>                                          167,818
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,144,793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,261,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,261,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,261,293)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)
        

</TABLE>
Elizabeth SCHREY, Mother, Appellant, v. Christopher John THOMLEY, Father, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-790

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the annual report of Liberator, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Louis S. Friedman, Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of WES Consulting, Inc.*, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(2)     
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date:
      August 19, 2010
              /s/
      Louis S. FriedmanLouis
      S. FriedmanChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of WES Consulting, Inc.
      *




* On
October 19, 2009, Liberator, Inc. merged with and into WES Consulting,
Inc.  As WES Consulting, Inc. is the surviving entity from such merger
and Liberator, Inc. has been merged out, this certification is signed by the
Principal Executive Officer of WES Consulting, Inc.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

NATALIE MYERS AND JULIANA

ROBERSON

VERSUS

MARY CAUTHEN, LINDA PETIT, 

MONIQUE BATISTE, CHERYL

BOSSENMEYER AND THE AMERICAN

LEGION AUXILIARY DEPARTMENT

OF LOUISIANA DEC

NO. 2023 CW 0592

SEPTEMBER 7, 2023

In Re: Mary Cauthen, Linda Petit, Monique Batiste, Cheryl

Bossenmeyer, and The American Legion Auxiliary

Department of Louisiana DEC, applying for supervisory

writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East

Baton Rouge, No. 685530. 

BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

JEW

GH

EW
William SEEFELDT and Jose La Torre, Appellants, v. Brent ADRIAN, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D16-2769

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Andre BRADLEY

CR-16-0164

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Matthew Phillip ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D15-5186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Lester SWARTZ, Appellant, v. POINCIANA PLACE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D16-4224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 18, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Tony MIMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Stephen D. LEONARD, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D17-1383

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 22, 2017

Stephen D. Leonard, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

LAGOA, J.

*1069Petitioner, Stephen Leonard, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus for claims including ineffective assistance of counsel. We dismiss the petition as unauthorized.

"Habeas corpus is a collateral remedy, and is no substitute for a direct appeal." *Gilbert v. Singletary*, 632 So.2d 1104, 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Petitioner's direct appeal of his conviction and sentencing is currently pending before this Court in Case Numbers 3D16-2298 and 3D16-2203. Moreover, Petitioner is represented by the Office of the Public Defender in those appeals. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed as unauthorized. *See**Douglas v. State*, 146 So.3d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (unpublished table decision).
Rodric Dwayne FAGIOLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2966

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,192]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Emerson Network Power, Tempe, Arizona.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7108 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Norberto PIETRI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1281

Supreme Court of Florida.

[February 2, 2018]

Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, William M. Hennis, III, Litigation Director, and Marta Jaszczolt, Staff Attorney, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Leslie T. Campbell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Norberto Pietri's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Pietri's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Pietri's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Pietri's appeal pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Pietri responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Pietri's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Pietri is not entitled to relief. Pietri was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of eight to four. *Pietri v. State*, 644 So.2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 1994). Pietri's sentence of death became final in 1995. *Pietri v. Florida*, 515 U.S. 1147, 115 S.Ct. 2588, 132 L.Ed.2d 836 (1995). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Pietri's sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Pietri's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Pietri, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, *237--- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.
Michael BUTLIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2785

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.