alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Jinmimi Network, Inc. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        | Jinmimi Network Inc. |
|-------------|----------------------|
|        |                 |   |
| May 5, 2011 | By:                  | /s/ Deng Zhang |
|        |                 | Deng Zhang |
|        |                 | President, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|        |                 |   |
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of their knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ A. Leon Blaser A. Leon Blaser, Chief Executive Officer  Date: February 9, 2007   /s/ Greg Holsted Greg Holsted, Chief Financial Officer  Date: February 9, 2007   {A0036984.DOC}
Mr. Robert Rogers UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEN C Y REG I O N 4 A

T LANTA FEDERAL CE NT E R

61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANT A , GEORGIA 30303

- 8960 

# APR l 9 2016

Manager, Pollution Control Section Memphis-Shelby County Health Department 814 Jefferson Avenue , Suite 437 Memphis , Tennessee 38105
Dear Mr. Rogers:
Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency's FY 2015 Air Pollution Control grant authorized by §105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency ' s various grant commitments and their status. Since there were no issues and no adjustments necessary , your report is now finalized. Thj s letter documents th e conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.115 and identified as a commitment 

### in your FY 2015 Air Planning Agree me nt under 

### Cross Cutting Iss ues.
We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2015 and look forward to continuing ourjoint efforts to prote ct and improve air quality. If you have any questions regarding your grant , please contact Stuart Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Gwendolyn Grafat (404) 562-9289.

Enclosure

# su**z: -ea~**  Carol L. Kemker Acting Director Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division

I n te rn et Ad d ress ( URL) • http ://www

. e p a.gov Recyc l ed/Recyc l ab l e • Printed with Vegetable Oil Base d Inks on R ecycl ed P ape r (Mini mu m 30% Pos tconsume r )
Exhibit 31

**CERTIFICATIONS**

A. Leon Blaser, the chief executive officer of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., and Greg Holsted, the interim chief financial officer of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., each hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “report”) of Environmental Energy Services, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Xavier Devon'Tae WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 22, 2011 |   | /s/ George Dory                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | George Dory, Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, principal financialofficer and principal accounting officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>   0000747159
<NAME>  JMB/245 PARK AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LTD.

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                          205,382 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    58,882 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                264,264 
<PP&E>                             0    
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  264,264 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        19,982,846 
<BONDS>                      43,236,631 
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                 (127,856,511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    264,264 
<SALES>                            0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                131,471 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                157,019 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              797,552 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (823,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             556,747 
<DISCONTINUED>                     0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                    556,747 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    523.00 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    523.00 

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Ronald S. Kaplan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Action Products International, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ RONALD S. KAPLANRonald S. KaplanChief Executive OfficerChief Financial OfficerAugust 14 , 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC PENSION INVESTORS '84 JUNE 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          46,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,704,875
<PP&E>                                       4,808,710
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,463,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,924,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,049
<BONDS>                                      1,601,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,204,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,924,375
<SALES>                                        233,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               330,305
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,763
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (159,765)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (159,765)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (159,765)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.07)
        

</TABLE>
Charles Q. SKYM, Individually and as Next Friend for Angela K. Skym, a Female Minor Child, Appellant, v. Kelly P. TINSLEY, Respondent.

WD 82212

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: July 23, 2019

Sarah J. Washburn, Troy, for Appellant.

Kelly P. Tinsley, Respondent Pro-se.

Before Division One: Cynthia A. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Charles Skym appeals the judgment of the Adair County Circuit Court denying *328his motion to prevent relocation. He complains in five points on appeal that the judgment is not in the best interest of the child, that the judgment deprives him of meaningful contact with the child, that the imposition of supervised visitation is unjust, that the trial court failed to include required statutory language, and that the trial judge should have recused himself.

Rule 84.14 affords us the discretion to "give such judgment as the court ought to give." Pursuant to that rule, the judgment is modified to include the following required language set forth in section 452.377.11, RSMo 2016:

> Absent exigent circumstances as determined by a court with jurisdiction, you, as a party to this action, are ordered to notify, in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and at least sixty days prior to the proposed relocation, each party to this action of any proposed relocation of the principal residence of the child, including the following information:

> (1) The intended new residence, including the specific address and mailing address, if known, and if not known, the city;

> (2) The home telephone number of the new residence, if known;

> (3) The date of the intended move or proposed relocation;

> (4) A brief statement of the specific reasons for the proposed relocation of the child; and

> (5) A proposal for a revised schedule of custody or visitation with the child. Your obligation to provide this information to each party continues as long as you or any other party by virtue of this order is entitled to custody of a child covered by this order. Your failure to obey the order of this court regarding the proposed relocation may result in further litigation to enforce such order, including contempt of court. In addition, your failure to notify a party of a relocation of the child may be considered in a proceeding to modify custody or visitation with the child. Reasonable costs and attorney fees may be assessed against you if you fail to give the required notice.

In all other aspects, the judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum discussing the Skym's points on appeal has been provided to the parties. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Annette BRYANT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2405, 3D17-0534

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.

Dismissed.
Edmund KERANEN, Fay Keranen, Richard Backos, Craig Cotton, Feank Farfalla, Carol Farfalla, Joseph Ioime, Joseph King, Joyce King, Daniel Klingbeil, Rick Minter, et al., Appellants, v. VENTURE ASSOCIATES CORPORATION, Venture Cable Corporation, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-3454

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Floyd William DAMREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1080

Supreme Court of Florida.

[February 2, 2018]

Robert S. Friedman, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Karin L. Moore and Stacy R. Biggart, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Northern Region, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Floyd William Damren's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Damren's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Damren's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Damren's appeal pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Damren responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Damren's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Damren is not entitled to relief. Damren was sentenced to death following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death. *Damren v. State*, 696 So.2d 709, 710 (Fla. 1997). Damren's sentence of death became final in 1998.

*231*Damren v. Florida*, 522 U.S. 1054, 118 S.Ct. 706, 139 L.Ed.2d 648 (1998). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Damren's sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Damren's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Damren, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATIONS




I, John
Leper, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, of Asia Global
Holdings Corp.:




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date:
      April 23, 2009
                          /s/
      John LeperJohn
      Leper, Chief Financial
Officer
STATE EX REL. Edward James MCKINNEY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1672

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Reconsideration denied.