alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61757-61758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9036-8]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed 12/18/2017 Through 12/22/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20170244, Draft, USFS, OR, Trout Creek, Comment Period Ends: 
02/12/2018, Contact: Joan Schmidgall (541) 367-3809.
EIS No. 20170245, Draft, USFS, WI, Townsend Project, Comment Period 
Ends: 02/12/2018, Contact: Marilee Houtler (715) 276-6333.
EIS No. 20170246, Draft, BR, CA, Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat 
Restoration & Fish Passage, Comment Period Ends: 02/15/2018, Contact: 
Ben Nelson (916) 414-2424.
EIS No. 20170247, Final, FHWA, NC, Complete 540--Triangle Expressway 
Southeast Extension, Review Period Ends: 02/01/2018, Contact: Jennifer 
Harris (919) 707-2704.
EIS No. 20170248, Draft, DC, AK, Mertarvik Infrastructure Development 
Nelson Island, Alaska Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2018, Contact: Don 
Antrobus, (907) 271-3500.


[[Page 61758]]


    Dated: December 22, 2017.
Kelly Knight,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017-28116 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Ralph Carol RHODABACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4235

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Alicia Paula SANDOVAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certifications
      of Chief Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Neil
      Swartz, Chief Executive Officer of Action Products International, Inc. (the
      “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of my knowledge, that:





·  the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                NEIL SWARTZNeil
                SwartzChief
                Executive OfficerNovember
                14, 2008




The
      certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed
      to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any
      filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Slawek Kajko, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)         
 the annual report on Form 10-K of Technology Publishing, Inc. for the year
ended August 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Technology
Publishing, Inc.

Date: December 1, 2008

/s/ Slawek
KajkoSlawek Kajko
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Technology Publishing, Inc. and will be retained by Technology Publishing, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Resource Exchange of America Corp., a Florida corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Dana Pekas, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Resource Exchange of America Corp, and will be retained by Resource Exchange of America Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date: December 23, 2010  /s/Dana Pekas Dana Pekas Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
---

|EXHIBIT 99.7                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION                                
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wendy Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer of Primero Mining
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/
      Wendy Kaufman
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | Wendy Kaufman          
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 31, 2015         

---
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tiger Media, Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 19, 2013
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Peter Tan          
|                     |  | Peter Tan              
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
David Bernard LOFTON v. STATE

CR-15-0996

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christopher MARTONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 09-2190

_____________

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA

v.

DEBORAH A., 

PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF C.C., A MINOR,

 Appellant

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 08-cv-02924)

District Judge: Berle M. Schiller

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

on Monday, March 21, 2011

Before: FUENTES, SMITH, AND VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges.

(Opinion Filed: April 6, 2011)

_____________________________

OPINION OF THE COURT

_____________________________

FUENTES, Circuit Judge:

In this special education civil rights case, the parent Deborah A. filed suit against 

the School District of Philadelphia on behalf of her daughter Candiss C., alleging that the 

School District failed to offer Candiss C. a free appropriate education in compliance with 
2

the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 

1400 et seq. Following a series of administrative and state court proceedings, Deborah 

A.’s various cases were consolidated in the District Court. Thereafter, the District Court 

considered several cross motions, including a motion for remand to the Pennsylvania 

Special Education Administrative Process for consideration of Deborah A.’s

compensatory education claims existing prior to July 1, 2005. 

After hearing the parties on the motions, the District Court concluded that the 

claims regarding events that occurred before July 27, 2005 were barred by IDEA’s twoyear statute of limitations. On appeal, the parties agree that our recent decision in Steven 

I. v. Central Bucks Sch. Dist., 618 F.3d 411 (3d Cir. 2010), “decid[ed] the same legal 

issue presented here”—that is, the applicability to Deborah A.’s claims of the shortened 

statute of limitations established in the IDEA as amended in 2004—and required the 

denial of her motion. (App’t Br. 2) In light of this concession, we will affirm the 

decision of the District Court for substantially the reasons given in that decision.
Bryant CRAIG v. STATE

CR-15-0841

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 474 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 474

  Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to place a real 
 time display of the United States total outstanding national debt in 
                           the House Chamber.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2023

 Mr. Norman (for himself, Mr. Posey, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Ms. 
  Mace, Mr. Rose, Mr. Brecheen, Mr. Perry, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. 
Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Santos, Mr. 
   Burlison, Mrs. Luna, and Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to place a real 
 time display of the United States total outstanding national debt in 
                           the House Chamber.

Whereas, on May 31, 2023, the United States national debt is at $31.818 
        trillion;
Whereas the national debt has increased by $3.9 trillion since President Biden 
        took office;
Whereas the Federal budget deficit according to Congressional Budget Office 
        (CBO) projections for fiscal year 2023 is $1.4 trillion;
Whereas the budget deficit is projected to increase by an additional $17 
        trillion by 2033;
Whereas the national debt is now projected to increase from $24.3 trillion in 
        2022 to $46.4 trillion by 2033;
Whereas the debt per taxpayer is over $248,040 as of May 31, 2023;
Whereas the national debt to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio is 120 percent;
Whereas the CBO estimates the national debt to GDP ratio will surpass 200 
        percent by 2053; and
Whereas the national debt will continue to rise at an alarmingly fast pace 
        unless Congress acts to reduce reckless government spending: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK IN HOUSE CHAMBER.

    (a) Responsibilities of Clerk.--The Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall place a real time display of the United States 
total outstanding national debt, as calculated by the Secretary of the 
Treasury, in the House Chamber in clear view of the Members.
    (b) Regulations.--The Clerk shall carry out this resolution in 
accordance with regulations promulgated by the Committee on House 
Administration, in consultation with the Committee on the Budget.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 333-174706 (pertaining to both the Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Option Plan and the 2009 Restricted Stock Plan) and No. 333-183678 (pertaining to the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan) and on Form S-1 (No. 333-177360), of our report dated April 1 , 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of FriendFinder Networks Inc., included in this annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2012.
 
 
  
 New York, New York
 April 1, 2013
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF M.P.R., L.K.R., and

P.J.R., Minor Children. 

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00229-CV

Appeal from the

224th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2021-CI-12156 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

1 Finding that the clerk’s record has not been filed due to the 

fault of Appellant, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On September 6, 2023, after the Bexar County District Clerk notified this Court of 

Appellant’s failure to pay or to arrange to pay for preparation of the clerk’s record, the Clerk of 

this Court sent a letter to all parties giving notice of the Court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution unless any party, within 10 days of the date of the notice, provided grounds

for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (authorizing an appellate court to dismiss an 

1 This case was transferred from the Fourth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the 

Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. We follow the precedent of the Fourth Court of 

Appeals to the extent it might conflict with our own. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
2

appeal if no clerk’s record is prepared due to Appellant’s fault). That notice also requested 

immediate notice be given to this Court, if the Bexar County District Court received satisfactory 

payment for the clerk’s record; but if payment were not received by September 21, 2023, for the 

Bexar County District Clerk to provide notice of Appellant’s non-payment. To date, no notice of 

either event has been received from the Bexar County District Clerk. 

Nonetheless, more than 10 days have elapsed from this Court’s notice of intention to 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, yet Appellant has not evidenced to this Court any 

payment (or arrangement to pay) for the preparation of the clerk’s record, nor has Appellant shown 

she is excused from paying such costs. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

October 6, 2023

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Charles Camorata, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mainstream Entertainment, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 33-8238, and an extension of the compliance date in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8545 and Release No. 33-8618;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 30, 2012  By: /s/ Charles CamorataCharles CamorataChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Keith M. SHANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3207

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
| 1. | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,      2009 (the      Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March      31, 2010                                                            |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                           |   |   |   |
| /s/ Michael O.      Banks                                                      |   |   |   |
| Michael      O. BanksExecutive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |

----
Fredrick L. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0923

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.