Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 61 / Wednesday, April 1, 2009 / Notices 14819 

Indian Meridian, Oklahoma, accepted March 

11, 2009. 

Potter County, Texas (TX) 

The plat representing a metes and bounds 

survey in Section 34, Block P MC, EL & RR 

Railway Co. Survey, Potter County, Texas, 

accepted February 5, 2009 for Group 9 TX. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

These plats will be available for 

inspection in the New Mexico State 

Office, Bureau of Land Management, 

P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 

87502–0115. Copies may be obtained 

from this office upon payment of $1.10 

per sheet. Contact Marcella Montoya at 

505–438–7537, or 

Marcella_Montoya@nm.blm.gov, for 

assistance. 

Robert A. Casias, 

Chief, Cadastral Surveyor. 

[FR Doc. E9–7275 Filed 3–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Meetings; Alaska Region’s 

Subsistence Resource Commission 

(SRC) Program 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of public meetings for 

the National Park Service Alaska 

Region’s Subsistence Resource 

Commission (SRC) program. 

SUMMARY: The Gates of the Arctic 

National Park Subsistence Resource 

Commission (GAAR SRC) and Denali 

National Park Subsistence Resource 

Commission (DENA SRC) will meet to 

develop and continue work on National 

Park Service (NPS) subsistence hunting 

program recommendations and other 

related subsistence management issues. 

These meetings are open to the public 

and will have time allocated for public 

testimony. The public is welcomed to 

present written or oral comments to the 

SRC. This meeting will be recorded and 

meeting minutes will be available upon 

request from the park superintendent for 

public inspection approximately six 

weeks after each meeting. The NPS SRC 

program is authorized under Title VIII, 

Section 808 of the Alaska National 

Interest Lands Conservation Act, Public 

Law 96–487, to operate in accordance 

with the provisions of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE GAAR

SRC MEETING CONTACT: Dave Krupa, 

Subsistence Manager, Tel. (907) 455– 

0631, Address: Gates of the Arctic 

National Park and Preserve, 4175 Geist 

Road, Fairbanks, AK 99709 or Clarence 

Summers, Subsistence Manager, Tel. 

(907) 644–3603. 

GAAR SRC Meeting Dates and 

Location: The GAAR SRC meeting will 

be held on Wednesday, April 15, and 

Thursday, April 16, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 

5 p.m. at the Anaktuvuk Pass 

Community Hall, Anaktuvuk Pass, AK. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE DENA

SRC MEETING CONTACT: Amy Craver, 

Subsistence Manager, Tel. (907) 683– 

9544, Address: Denali National Park and 

Preserve, P.O. Box 9, Denali Park, AK 

99755 or Clarence Summers, 

Subsistence Manager, Tel. (907) 644– 

3603. 

DENA SRC Meeting Date and 

Location: The DENA SRC meeting will 

be held on Thursday, April 30, 2009, 

from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the Denali Dome 

Home B & B in Healy, AK. 

The proposed meeting agenda for 

each meeting includes the following: 

1. Call to order 

2. SRC Roll Call and Confirmation of 

Quorum 

3. SRC Chair and Superintendent’s 

Welcome and Introductions 

4. Approval of Minutes from Last SRC 

Meeting 

5. Review and Approve Agenda 

6. Status of SRC Membership and 

Charter 

7. SRC Member Reports 

8. Park Subsistence Manager Report 

9. National Park Service Staff Reports 

a. Resource Management Report 

b. Ranger Division Update. 

c. Wildlife Biologist Report—Status of 

Wildlife Surveys 

d. Subsistence Uses of Horns, Antlers, 

Bones and Plants EA Update 

10. Federal Subsistence Board Update 

11. Alaska Board of Game Update 

12. Old Business 

13. New Business 

14. Public and other Agency Comments. 

15. SRC Work/Training Session 

16. Set Time and Place for next SRC 

Meeting 

17. Adjournment 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SRC 

meeting location and date may need to 

be changed based on weather or local 

circumstances. If the meeting date and 

location are changed, a notice will be 

published in local newspapers and 

announced on local radio stations prior 

to the meeting date. The meeting may 

end early if all business is completed. 

Dated: February 13, 2009. 

Victor Knox, 

Deputy Regional Director. 

[FR Doc. E9–7282 Filed 3–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–HK–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Sequoia and Kings Canyon National 

Parks; Receipt of Application for 

Telecommunication Site 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Sequoia 

and Kings Canyon National Parks, 

Interior 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: (Authorities: 47 U.S.C. 332 

note (Telecommunications Act of 1996, 

Section 704(c)); 16 U.S.C. 5; other 

applicable authorities and National Park 

Service (NPS) Director’s Order 53) 

Sequoia and Kings Canyon National 

Parks has received an application from 

Verizon Wireless to construct an eighty 

foot tall, cellular tower with associated 

support structures and equipment. The 

location of the proposed 

telecommunication site is Park Ridge, 

near Grant Grove within Kings Canyon 

National Park. Park Ridge is an 

established telecommunications site for 

Sequoia and Kings Canyon National 

Parks. Current structures on Park Ridge 

include: two concrete block structures 

containing NPS and U.S. Forest Service 

(USFS) communications equipment 

with power generators; a twenty foot fire 

lookout tower; two forty foot lattice 

towers with NPS and USFS 

telecommunications equipment; and a 

thirty foot tower on the NPS 

communications building supporting a 

passive reflector used for landline 

service operated by Verizon California. 

The proposed Verizon 

telecommunication site may include a 

tower approximately 80 feet tall, an 

equipment building and necessary 

utilities. The staff at Sequoia and Kings 

Canyon National Parks is currently 

evaluating the proposal and conducting 

a review and analysis pursuant to the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA), the National Historic 

Preservation Act, The 

Telecommunications Act of 1996, and 

National Park Service requirements, 

policy and regulations. Once completed 

the NEPA analysis including the effects, 

if any, on cultural resources will be 

available for public review. 

DATES: Review and analysis pursuant to 

NEPA and the National Historic 

Preservation Act, initiated in December 

of 2008 is currently being conducted by 

Sequoia and Kings Canyon National 

Parks and will be completed after May 

1, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposal 

may be mailed to the park, Sequoia and 

Kings Canyon National Park, Planning 

and Compliance Office, 47050 Generals 

14820 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 61 / Wednesday, April 1, 2009 / Notices 

Highway, Three Rivers, CA 93271 or emailed to seki_planning@nps.gov. 

Copies of the completed NEPA 

analysis will be available at the Office 

of the Superintendent Sequoia and 

Kings Canyon National Parks, online at 

the Web site http:// 

parkplanning.gov.nps/seki, or can be 

requested by writing to Sequoia and 

Kings Canyon National Parks, Planning 

and Compliance Office, 47050 Generals 

Highway, Three Rivers, CA 93271, or by 

e-mail addressed to 

seki_planning@nps.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christine Smith, 559–565–3105 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments 

Before including an address, phone 

number, e-mail address or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment including your 

personal identifying information may be 

made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. Anonymous comments will not 

be accepted. 

Dated: February 9, 2009. 

Daniel E. Blackwell, 

Acting Superintendent, Sequoia and Kings 

Canyon National Parks. 

[FR Doc. E9–7058 Filed 3–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–X2–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–605] 

In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor 

Chips With Minimized Chip Package 

Size and Products Containing Same; 

Notice of Commission Decision To 

Request Additional Briefing on 

Remedy and To Extend the Target Date 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to request 

additional briefing on remedy and to 

extend the target date to May 20, 2009, 

in the above captioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on May 21, 2007, based on a complaint 

filed by Tessera, Inc. of San Jose, 

California against Spansion, Inc. and 

Spansion, LLC, both of Sunnyvale, 

California; QUALCOMM, Inc. of San 

Diego, California; AT1 Technologies of 

Thornhill, Ontario, Canada; Motorola, 

Inc. of Schaumburg, Illinois 

(‘‘Motorola’’); STMicroelectronics N.V. 

of Geneva, Switzerland; and Freescale 

Semiconductor, Inc. of Austin, Texas. 

72 FR 28522 (May 21, 2007). The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain semiconductor 

chips with minimized chip package size 

or products containing same by reason 

of infringement of one or more claims of 

U.S. Patent Nos. 5,852,326, and 

6,433,419. 

On December 1, 2008, the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued 

his final ID finding no violation of 

section 337 by Respondents. The ID 

included the ALJ’s recommended 

determination on remedy and bonding. 

In his ID, the ALJ found that 

Respondents’ accused products do not 

infringe the asserted claims the ‘326 

patent or the asserted claims of the ‘419 

patent. The ALJ additionally found that 

the asserted claims of the ‘326 and ‘419 

patents are not invalid for failing to 

satisfy the enablement requirement or 

the written description requirement of 

35 U.S.C. 112 ¶ 1. The ALJ further found 

that the asserted claims of the ‘326 and 

‘419 patents are not invalid as indefinite 

of 35 U.S.C. 112 ¶ 2. The ALJ also found 

that the asserted claims of the ‘326 and 

‘419 patents are not invalid under 35 

U.S.C. 102 for anticipation or under 35 

U.S.C. 103 for obviousness. Finally, the 

ALJ found that an industry in the 

United States exists with respect to the 

‘326 and ‘419 patents as required by 19 

U.S.C. 1337(a)(2) and (3). In his 

recommended determination, the ALJ 

recommended that, should the 

Commission determine that a violation 

exists, a limited exclusion order 

(‘‘LEO’’) would be properly directed to 

Respondents’ accused chip packages 

and to the downstream products of 

Motorola, a named respondent. 

On January 30, 2009, the Commission 

determined to review the final ID in part 

and requested briefing on the issues it 

determined to review, remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. 74 FR 

6175–6 (Feb. 5, 2009). The Commission 

determined to review: (1) The ALJ’s 

finding that Respondents’ accused 

devices do not infringe the asserted 

claims the ‘326 and ‘419 patents; (2) the 

ALJ’s finding that Tessera has waived 

any argument that the accused products 

indirectly infringe the ‘419 patent; (3) 

the ALJ’s finding that Motorola*s 

invention of the 1989 68HC11 OMPAC 

chip (‘‘OMPAC’’) does not anticipate the 

asserted patents under 35 U.S.C. 102(b); 

and (4) the ALJ’s finding that the 

Motorola’s OMPAC invention does not 

anticipate the asserted patents under 35 

U.S.C. 102(g). Id. The Commission 

determined not to review the remaining 

issues decided in the ID. 

On February 23, 2009, the parties 

filed initial written submissions 

regarding the issues on review, remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding. On 

March 5, the parties filed response 

submissions. Several respondents in copending investigation Certain 

Semiconductor Chips with Minimized 

Chip Package Size and Products 

Containing Same, Inv. No. 337–TA–649, 

also filed reply briefs on remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. In its 

initial submission on remedy, Tessera 

requested that the Commission issue a 

‘‘tailored’’ general exclusion order 

(‘‘GEO’’) should the Commission 

determine that there is a violation of 

Section 337. See Complainant Tessera, 

Inc.’s Brief on the Issues of Remedy, the 

Public Interest and Bonding (Public 

Version) (March 5, 2009) (‘‘Tessera 

Remedy Br.’’) (available on EDIS). 

Tessera also requested that, should the 

Commission determine that the current 

record is not adequate to support 

issuance of a GEO, the Commission 

should issue immediately the LEO 

recommended by the ALJ and then 

conduct further proceedings regarding 

the availability of a tailored GEO. See 

Tessera Remedy Br. at 5–6. The 

Commission investigative attorney 

(‘‘IA’’) concurred. See Response of 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations to 

Complainant’s and Respondents’ Briefs 

on Issues Under Review and on