# OAR Box 1793 Prepped by Keeia Richards p. 1



### Document

Number: 

# 21 ) ll-F-6 3
Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/3/2008 11:31:54

AM Sheet 21 of 45P. 2

10/27/9 5 09:4 0 S20 2 208462 0 WAS O NR/A Q NP S 1^1001/00 3


## Unite d States Departmento f th e Interio r /I-96-3 7

I N Kt* u HCFE * TO : NATIONA L PAR KSERVIC E P.O . BO X 3712 7 WASHINGTON , o. c 20013-712 7



# • • JbJAU DAT E
NUMBE RO F PASE S T O FOLLOM i &• 

# TO

. pcuA" ^ S£**~**_? Wdjf2*e& t>L. h 

# - ^ <?

. 

# i

FR0H : KQJHL A Ai « tKI s /

SUBJECT : 

# vus R

HAV E ANYPROBLEM S UIT H THI S FA XO R PLEAS E CAL L TH E INDIVIDUA L FRO N HHON YOUAR E RECEIVIN

GTH E FAX . TROUBL E RECEIVIN

GA FAX«
BLACKMELL . LAUREN

202-208 - CONNINS . BIL L 202-208 - DENNIS , JOH N

202-208 - DiSALVO , CARO L 202-219 - EADY , COLLETT E 202-208 - JOMSTUN , 6AR Y202-208 - KLIUINSKI , SHARON

202-208 - NAUCIN , KARE N

202-219 - 491 2 NCCLELLAND . LINDSA Y 463 1 NILLER , ABB Y 519 3 OLHELL , PEG6 Y 893 6 PECK , OEBB Y 464 0 SHAFER , CRA1 6 588 6 UAUCER , BIL L 463 9 UATKINS . tflLMA 338 4 UILSON , RITA 202-208-495 8 202-208-465 0 202-219-893 3 202-208-462 4 202-219-893 4 202-219-338 6 202-208-491 3 202-208-388 4P. 3

j.u/27/a o Utf.-i U 'Oti*)i aiW O aatOZ U ItAS U INK/ A M W S ©002/00 3

KEYISSUE S AN

D STATU S A S OF 10/26/9 5 1 . D e minimu s o r significanc e level s for AQRVs EPA an d DO I have reache

d agreemen t o

n compromis e lan<miumj EP A t o ad d i n edit s discussed toda y 2 . Definition o f "advers e impact " EPA an d DO I have reache

d agreemen t o

ncompromis e languittM ; EP A t o ad d i n edit s discussed today , includin g deletin

g las t p^^anc e on p . 166 . On e additiona l clarifyin g sentenc e i s #^gge5tad regarding HAP s tha t ar e constituent s o f criteri a pollutants ; (inser t for p . 165) , EP

A OGC (Mark ) ha s approve d fro m lega l standpoint . 3 . Linkag e a t notic e stage EPA an d DO I have reache

d agreemen t oncompromis e langWMM ; EP A t o ad d i nedit s discussed toda y ("potential" ) 4 . Definition o f AQRVs EPA an d DO I have reache

d agreemen t o

n compromis e lang-pBjM (pp . 165 , 193 ; EP

A t o ad d in edit s discusse d toda y (mak e clfcfc p tha t advers e impac t fo r al l AQRVs no t new ) 5 . "Deference " t o FLM s (proposal s fro m OM B t o delet e thif? ) EPA an d DO I ar e stil l discussin g language . A

nadditiigna l compromis e version wa s FAXe d fo r EP A consideratio

nthi s afteje$pon . (see Molly' s proposed insert ) 6 . 5 0 k

m cutof f for considerin g Clas s I I are a impact s EPA an d DO I ar e stil l discussin g language . DO I pVfMse s (again ) t o delet e footnot e 6 8 referrin g t o th e cutoff , or , alternatively , t o clarif y tha t th

e cutof f i s onl y

relevan t t o Gaussia n model s (no t long-range transport ) an d onl y relevan t t o Clas s I I are a analysis . 7 . Limitationo f pollutant s considere d fo r advers e impac t t o criteri a pollutant s EPA an d DO I ar e stil l discussin g language . DO I (NPS ) pip($.p<5se d insert s wer e discussed inconcept vit hEP A OG C (Mark ) thi s evening , an d ar e approved fro m lega l standpoint . Insert s stil l nee d EPA policy approval .
4*
. 8 . Othe r wordin

g change s previousl y suggeste

d b y DO I fa y e&arit y o f legal , technica l an d polic y considerations . EPA an d DO I hav

e reache

d agreement o

n compromis e languag e (page s throughou t Clas s I sectio n o f preambl e an

d o n regulation wit hregard t o criteri a for rejectin g advers e impact) ; EP A t o ad d i n edit s discussed today . #*'• > 2 •.•3g8 & i

• ••*>••<•

W-
. -

y£0?'--M

WM

**-!

Si-V fP A

10/27/9 5 09:4 1 ©20 2 20 8 462 0 WAS O NR/A Q NP S B.003/00 3



### •&Z5B8E77

m

PROPOSE D NS R INSERT FO RPREAMBLE P . 6 0 (6/29/9 5 D "ADVERSEL

YIMPAC T AQRVS. " The potentia l advers e impac t t o AQRVs ma y b e du e oijgj l ] |f|or e Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s (HAPs ) tha t ar e constituent s o f WJftHiri a pollutants . For example , increase s inmercur y an d J>§Miliu

m shoul d b e considered . FLMs hav e expresse

d concern s abou t 1$BY# * an d othe r pollutants , an d shoul d be consulted b y permitting ^fc&ofritie s whe n decidin

g whethe r a particula r proposed applicability - exclusion migh t impac t AQRVs . '•* -A ft-'

rf* v' 

# I

St;*; , •..C l 

# m

PROPOSE D INS.ER

T FO R PAG E 61 , AFTER EN

D O F FIRS T PARA . (NOtE l EPA STAF F AGREE D T O CONSIDE R THI S BEFORE , BU T W E HAV E RECEIVE S N

O :jjf e DEFINITIV

E RESPONSE) : U O f course , a s i

n al l decision s pertainin g t o advers e impact s o n AQRVs , i t i s expected tha t th e permittin

g authority

woul d consul t wit hthe FL

M o f potentiall y

affecte

d Clas s I area*. - J5uc h consultation wil l hel p enabl e FLMs t o carr y out thei r afflVtyfttiv e responsibilit y

unde r th

e Ac t t o protec t AQRVs .
PROPOSE D INSERT FO

R P . 16 5 (DAN' S 10/2 5 VERSION) , AFTERFJJM f RED LINED PARAGRAP H ENDS : ?r , «
I n determinin

g whethe r emission s fro m a proposed eo^tf f .tfoul d presen t a

nadvers e impact , an y pollutant s tha t ar e const4fcu*n£ s o f criteri a pollutant s shoul d be considered . 

## W& [Mar k K . say s thi s i s consisten t w/EP A policy/lega l infcer£ « an d J^.v: ^ expressed i n a memo. ] ?&*': ?.?
•'•••-2 A;.

-

: • / •

-) , i •'•• hi



## A 

# •mm

•."• a S- 2

; « •I s

• - , t

a " J
'4

-