alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX PARTE Carlton GAITERS

CR-15-1017

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 24, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 573 

Expressing support for the designation of July 14th as ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation Day’’ and recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving the technological 

achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2023 

Mr. POSEY (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of July 14th as ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation Day’’ and recognizing that the 

collection and restoration of historic and classic cars 

is an important part of preserving the technological 

achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic 

automobiles as a pastime and do so with great passion 

and as a means of individual expression; 

Whereas ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation Day’’ events and commemorations create opportunities for collector car owners 

to educate young people about the importance of preserving the cultural heritage of the United States, includVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:44 Jul 01, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR573.IH HR573

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 573 IH 

ing through the collection and restoration of collector 

cars; 

Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses 

have been instrumental in preserving a historic part of 

the heritage of the United States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage works of art; 

Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, highskilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, 

photography, cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits 

that have become part of the popular culture of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Collector Car 

3 Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the effect that the more than 

5 100-year history of the automobile has had on the 

6 economic progress of the United States and supports 

7 wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restora8 tion and exhibition of classic automobiles; 

9 (3) recognizes that the collection and restora10 tion of historic and classic cars is an important part 

11 of preserving the technological achievements and cul12 tural heritage of the United States; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 573 IH 

1 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to engage in events and commemorations of ‘‘Col3 lector Car Appreciation Day’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Chald-Son SANON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1414

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Detron Lamonte CUSHION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2165

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                       JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                                12263353
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           411450
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            411450
<INVENTORY>                                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                             0
<PP&E>                                                                  960000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           52500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        13175730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                        0
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            11145469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          13175730
<SALES>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       2482826
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        260972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        2221854
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    2221854
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           2221854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            12.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-160304) pertaining to the Myrexis, Inc.
2009 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, and the Myrexis, Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our reports dated September 13, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Myrexis, Inc., and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of Myrexis, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2010.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                     
|Salt Lake City, Utah 
|September 13, 2010
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Pier Acquisition I, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip J. Huml,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.





Date:  December
      15, 2010/s/ Philip
      J. HumlPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
                    Pier
      Acquisition I, Inc.




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7336** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 7:92

- cr - 00135

- JPJ

- RSB

- 1 ; 7:14

- cv - 00353 ; 7:14

- cv - 80760

- JPJ

- RSB )

Submitted : January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jimmy Lawrence Nance , Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jimmy Lawrence Nance seeks to appeal the district court’s orders treating his “Petition and Motion for a Writ of Coram Nobis and/or Audita Querela” as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis, and deny ing Nance’s motion for reconsideration. The district court’s orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2012); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certif icate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that rea sonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently revi ewed the record and conclude that Nance has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we3 deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-24-00145-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 43rd District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR22-0831

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

LARRY RAY CAPKO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Larry Ray Capko attempts to appeal his conviction, but he waived 

his right of appeal when he entered into a plea bargain with the State.

“In a plea bargain case[,] . . . a defendant may appeal only . . . (A) those matters 

that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the

trial court’s permission to appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly 

authorized by statute.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 

44.02. The trial court must file a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal, 

clarifying whether the case involved a plea bargain and whether the defendant waived 

his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

Capko’s judgment of conviction reflects the terms of his plea bargain, and the 

trial court’s certification confirms that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal”

and that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See 

id. The certification here was signed not only by the trial court but also by Capko and

by his trial counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Because criminal appeals “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record,” see id., we 

informed Capko that we could dismiss his appeal unless, within 10 days, he showed

grounds for continuing it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. More than 20 days have passed 

but we have not received a response.

Accordingly, we dismiss Capko’s appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
3

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: May 30, 2024
# United Stat es Court of Appeals For the First C ircuit No. 02-1645 FELIX MATEO,

a/k/a Manuel Lluberes, Johnny Rodriguez,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, Appellee.

ERRATA The opinion of this Court, issued on November 7, 2002, should be amended as follows: On page 4 , 3rd line of 2nd full paragraph, insert "rule o f constitutional" between "new" and "law". On page 5, 7th line down, replace "7 th " with "7th".
Ralph Carol RHODABACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4237

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
MS DOCKSIDE MARIANA, LLC, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-841

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ritchy BIENAIME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3643

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

Ritchy Bienaime, Orlando, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca R. McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We affirm the postconviction court's dismissal of Appellant's rule 3.850 motion. We do so without prejudice for Appellant to file a motion for postconviction relief, if appropriate, upon issuance of the mandate in his previously filed direct appeal, case number 5D17-3164.

EVANDER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rider Exploration, Inc. for the year ended 10/31/10 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 10/31/10, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Rider Exploration Inc . |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |        |                                     |   |
|--------|-------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:         | /s/ Steve Friberg                        |   |
|   |        |                                     |   |
|   | Name   | Steve Friberg                            |   |
|   |        |                                     |   |
|   | Title  | Principal Executive Officer,             |   |
|   |        | Principal Financial Officer and Director |   |
|   |        |                                     |   |
|   | Date        | April 1, 2011                            |   |

----
Christopher Alan FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Shawn E. MYERS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2685

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 4, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 60 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-114, CP2018-156.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-28456 Filed 1-3-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Order entered June 11, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01604-CR

AUSTIN BILL HIXSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-81668-2014

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s June 9, 2015 motion for extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file the brief within FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from the date of 

this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

| 1. | The                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Daniel T.                Fagan                                            Daniel                T. Fagan Chairman                & Chief Executive Officer February                1, 2007   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SALVATORE M. DECANIO, JR., a/k/a SALVATORE F. DECANIO,

Appellant,

v.

CAROL A. DECANIO,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-348

[April 26, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; David E. French, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2006DR014854XXXXSB.

Ronald L. Bornstein of Ronald L. Bornstein, P.A., Greenacres, for 

appellant.

Mark A. Skipper of Law Office of Mark A. Skipper, P.A., Orlando, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1519

COWIN & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, versus JAMES CABE, Deceased; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-561-BLA, 97-1806-BLA, 95-1328-BLA, 92-2176-BLA) Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William H. Howe, Mary Lou Smith, HOWE, ANDERSON & STEYER, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Henry L. Solano, Solicitor ofLabor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor for Black Lung Benefits, Patricia M. Nece, Rita A. Roppolo, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Cowin & Company, Incorporated seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidenceand is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the Board. See Cowin & Co., Inc. v. Cabe , Nos. 99-561-BLA; 97-1806-BLA; 95-1328-BLA; 92-2176-BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED