alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN GILBERT,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00359

- CR

Appeal from

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1002470D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN GILBERT,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00359

- CR

Appeal from

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1002470D)

RECORD RETENTION STATEMENT:

Pursuant to the Supreme Court order regarding disposition of court documents in this

case, it is determined that this record should be:

x NOT PERMANENTLY PRESERVED

(NO HISTORICAL VALUE)

PERMANENTLY PRESERVED

(PERMANENTLY RETAIN

-- HAS HISTORICAL VALUE)

PERMANENTLY RETAINED CRIMINAL CASE

(sentence over 20 years)

_______________________________________________ ____ 3/28/13

____________ Judge = s Signature Date

Date Destroyed: ______________________________ per Order dated _____________COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN GILBERT,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00359

- CR

Appeal from

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1002470D)

O R D E R

On this the 28th day of March, 2013, came on to be heard Kimberly Campbell’s motion

to withdraw. Having determined that counsel has met the requirements of Anders v. California

,

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18

L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) and T EX .R.A PP .P. 6.5, we grant the motion to withdraw on the following

terms and conditions:

Counsel is directed to (1) forward to Appellant this order and the Court’ = s opinion and

judgment issu ed this same day in this cause; (2) notify Appellant of the availability of

discretionary review; and (3) notify Appellant of the appellate deadlines applicable to

discretionary review.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013.

_________________ _______________________________ ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
STATE of Louisiana v. Dexter VASSAR

NO. 2018-KH-0169

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

*1191Writ not considered. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review.
1

Nonresponse Survey Preview and Cover Letters.pdf

Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Created: 10/19/2011

Purpose: This file includes the cover letter for the priority mail nonresponse questionnaire (p. 2) 

and the preview letter for the telephone questionnaire (p. 3).
2
3
CAS • 2540 Olentangy River Road • P.O. Box 3343 • Columbus, OH 43210-0334 • USA

A division of the American Chemical Society	 Phone: 800-631-1884, 614-447-3870

Fax: 614-447-3747

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

June 4, 2015

XF Technologies 

ATTN: Mr. Kyle M. Ellis 

524 McKnight Ave. NW 

Albuquerque, NM 87102

Dear Mr. Ellis:

Thank you for your Inventory Expert Service (IES) order of June 03, 2015. 

The processing results are attached. 

To ensure efficient processing of your substance(s), it is important that these results are 

included with your PMN report for when reporting to the EPA. 

The cost of the technical processing for your order will be applied to your Visa. 

Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service. If you have any questions, please do not 

hesitate to contact me. 

Sincerely,

Jennifer Moore

CAS Client Services

Enclosure(s)
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

A	division	of	the	American	Chemical	Society	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540 Olentangy River Road					•					P.O. Box 3343					•					Columbus, OH		43210-0334					•					USA

,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU

&$,QGH[1DPH

)XUDQFDUER[DOGHK\GHFKORURPHWK\O
Harry DUBOSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-642

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 4, 2017 Rehearing Denied February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ricoh Christian JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1426

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kenneth R. WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105598

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: April 10, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Kenneth R. Wilson appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
1 ... T h i s pro ceedi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 91- CR
- 1948- A, s t y l ed St at e v . Co r nel l D r um m er , i n the 1 4 4 th Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas, t he H o no rable Ca t heri ne T o rr es- Stahl presi d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION
No
. 04 -0 9- 00 22 9- CR IN RE Cor

ne ll DRUM MER Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Phy lis S peedlin, Just ice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: May 20, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DI SMI SSED FOR WANT OF JURI SDI CTI ON On April 20, 2009, re lator Cornell Drummer filed a petition for writ of m andamus, see king t o co m p el t h e tr i al co urt t o ru l e on v ar i o u s p o s t -c o n v i ct i o n m o t i o n s i n a fi n al fe l o n y p r o ce ed i n g. Relator conte nds the trial cour t has deprive d him “of a spe edier resolutio n o f h i s challeng e to the leg alities of his co n fi nement.” I n 1992, rela tor was c onvicted of murde r and w as sentenc ed to 99 y ear s’ conf

inement. On May

26, 1993, this court aff

irmed the c onviction. On ly the Te xas C ourt

of Cr imi na l App e a ls h a s juri sd icti on ov er ma tte rs re la te d to po stconviction re lief fr om an otherw ise final fe lony conviction. Se e At e r v . E igh th C ou rt o f A pp e als , 80204
- 09
- 00 22 9- CR

- 2- S.W. 2d 24 1, 24 3 ( Te x. 19 91 ); see also T EX . C ODE C R IM . P R OC . ANN . art. 1 1
. 0 7 (Ve rnon Supp. 20 08 ); Bo ar

d o f P ar do ns & Pa ro le

s e xre l. K e e ne v . Cour t of Ap

pe als for Ei gh th D ist
. , 910 S.W .2d 48 1, 48 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 95 ) (hol di ng th at “Ar tic le 11 .0 7 p ro vid e s th e e xclu siv e me a ns to
c ha lle ng e a

fi na l fe lony c on vic tio n. ” ). B e c a us e the re lie f sou g ht in r e la tor ’s pe tit ion re la te s to po stconviction re lief fr om an otherw ise final felony conviction, we are without jurisdiction t o consider his petition for writ of mandamus. Acc ording ly , rela tor’s petition is dism issed for lac k of jurisdiction. P E R C U R I A M DO NO T PU B L I SH
Cheri Rose GRANGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3406

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cheri Rose Granger, timely appeals her convictions by jury verdict for DUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide, driving while license suspended and DUI with property damage. We reverse her conviction for vehicular homicide, and otherwise affirm.

Appellant argues that convictions for both DUI manslaughter and vehicular homicide based upon a single death cannot stand because they violate her constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy, citing *Houser v. State* , 474 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1985), and *State v. Chapman* , 625 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1993). The State concedes error, and based upon our supreme court's precedent, we agree. Accordingly, we order the trial court to vacate Appellant's conviction for vehicular homicide. *See**Aguirre v. State* , 159 So.3d 1033, 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ; *Ivey v. State* , 47 So.3d 908, 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). We affirm Appellant's conviction and sentence for DUI manslaughter, as well as her other convictions and sentences for driving while license suspended and DUI with property damage.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PALMER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
June 10, 2015

Mr. Roger Mason

Lockheed Martin MST 103 Chesapeake Park Plaza Baltimore, MD 21220

Dear Mr. Mason:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 19, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1795), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,114]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 4, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at SPS Technology, Waterford, Michigan.

The petitioners requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7136 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Michael D. HUTCHISON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2235

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ A. Leon Blaser  A. Leon Blaser, Chief Executive Officer  Date:  July 24, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-725]



[[Page 2609]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Immune Regulation of Inflammatory 
Pulmonary Disease.
    Date: February 4, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
3258, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Eric Lorenzo, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 3258, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2640, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a1615081f1400151f3a14131b131e54141312541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee82819c8b8094818bae80878f878ac0808786c0898198">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Lymphocyte Abnormalities.
    Date: February 4, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Wendy F. Davidson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-8399, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d494c5b44495e42435a6d404c444103434445034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea8e8b9c838e9985849daa878b8386c4848382c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 8, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-725 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 61 (Wednesday, April 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7228]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April 
2, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
April 2, 2009 will be:
    Institution of an injunctive action; institution and settlement of 
administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; adjudicatory 
matters; and other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: March 26, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-7228 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE
Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. 10-Q




EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph C. Passalaqua, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: February 16, 2010

/s/ Joseph C. PassalaquaName: Joseph C. Passalaqua
Title: President. Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,581]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 12, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Form Tech Industries, LLC, Minerva, Ohio.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7095 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Jarrod Nicolas ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3309

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Everette DRAUGHN v. Eugene "Tat-2" "the Bounty Hunter" THACKER, et al.

NO. 2017-CC-1841

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

Reconsideration granted. Writ denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant the writ.
Sean SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[No. 28629-7-II.

Division Two.

April 27, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Shahn Aaron Divorne, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 01-1-00067-7, Frederick B. Hayes, J., entered April 1, 2002. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Morgan, A.C.J., and Bridgewater, J.