alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy (DOE).

# ACTION:

Notice of 229 Boundary for the Fort Saint Vrain (FSV) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI).

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that the U. S. Department of Energy, pursuant to Section 229 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 26, 1963 (28 FR 8400), prohibits the unauthorized entry, and the unauthorized introduction of weapons or dangerous materials into or upon the following described facilities of the Fort Saint Vrain Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation of the United States Department of Energy.                    

The FSV ISFSI is located on part of the original FSV Nuclear Generating Station site which is about three and one-half miles northwest of Platteville, Colorado. Platteville is located in Weld County and is about 35 miles north of Denver. The FSV ISFSI street address is 17122 19.5 Weld County Road, Platteville, Colorado. The ISFSI is located approximately 1500 feet northeast of the Public Service of Colorado fossil-fueled, power plant building. The facility occupies 10 acres more or less. The 229 Boundary of this facility is indicated by a combination of chain link fence and chain link gates which surround the facility.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott E. Ferrara, the Department of Energy—Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID), 1955 Fremont Ave., Idaho Falls, ID 83415. Telephone (208) 526-5531.

Issued in Idaho Falls, Idaho, on June 1, 2017.

Scott E. Ferrara,

DOE-ID Facility Director.

# Editorial Note:

 This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on December 21, 2017.

[FR Doc. 2017-27880 Filed 12-26-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
STATE EX REL. Tyrone K. DAVENPORT and Dale M. Elmore v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-0079

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Environmental Energy
Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify,
to the best of his knowledge, that:

     1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all material
respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/s/ __________________________________
A. Leon Blaser, Chief Executive Officer

Date: July 29, 2003



/s/ __________________________________
Greg Holsted, Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 29, 2003
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Banc of America Funding Corporation
214 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28255


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2009:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Trustee under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been
made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the reporting period.


March 1, 2010

/s/ Diane Courtney
Diane Courtney
Vice President


(page)


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Trust Agreement for Banc of America Funding 2009-R1 Trust Mortgage
Certificate-Backed Certificates, Series 2009-R1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Trustee.
Ernest Lee WALKER v. STATE

CR-15-0755

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Alexius Rhamon FOSTER v. STATE

CR-15-0435

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
LOGO

Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of SearchMedia Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-176634) and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-177025) of our report dated
October 29, 2010 with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2011. We resigned as auditors on April 22, 2011 and, accordingly, we have not performed any audit or review procedures with respect to any financial statements appearing in such Registration Statements for the periods
after the date of our resignation. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading Statement by Experts in the Registration Statement on Form F-3.

/s/ Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP

Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP

New York, New York

May 15, 2012









LOGO
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 2 June 2005

in Case C-83/03 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of projects on the environment - Construction of a marina at Fossacesia)

(2005/C 182/07)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-83/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: R. Amorosi and A. Aresu) v Italian Republic (Agent: I.M. Braguglia, assisted by M. Fiorilli, avocat) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 26 February 2003 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 2 June 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 112 of 10.05.2003

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC PENSION INVESTORS '84 SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,427,067
<PP&E>                                       4,803,698
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,332,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,562,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,468,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,562,674
<SALES>                                        351,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               496,182
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  307,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               182,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                251,472
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            251,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   251,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.27
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert Klein, Secretary, Treasurer, and the
Chief Financial Officer of Precise Life Sciences Ltd., a Nevada Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d));

and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 Dated: May 20, 2003

/s/ Robert Klein
------------------
   Robert Klein

Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000747952
<NAME> BIOMATRIX, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       7,654,201
<SECURITIES>                                 7,998,744
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,602,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (25,500)
<INVENTORY>                                    860,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,084,468
<PP&E>                                      13,546,785
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,707,796)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,086,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,734,465
<BONDS>                                      5,949,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    57,082,174
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,503,851)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,086,250
<SALES>                                      1,902,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,043,131
<CGS>                                          876,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,665,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,545,735
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,545,735
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,545,735
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3925 — Ups/LYNX)

(2005/C 212/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Bruce Newman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Protocall Technologies Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





|                      |     |                        
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|Date: August 20, 2007 | By: | /s/ Bruce Newman       
|                      |     | Bruce Newman           
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.19


 


Summary of Director Compensation


 


Cash fees paid to our non-employee directors consist of a $40,000
annual retainer fee, payable quarterly in advance.  We reimburse directors for certain fees and
expenses incurred in connection with continuing education seminars and travel
expenses related to Dollar General meeting attendance or requested appearances,
and we allow directors to travel on our airplane for those purposes.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daugherty Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the period ended September 30, 2003
(the "Reporting Period"), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), the undersigned, William S. Daugherty, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1. I have reviewed the Report and, based on my knowledge, the Report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which they are made, not misleading with respect to the Reporting Period.

      2. Based on my knowledge, the condensed consolidated financial statements
and other financial information included in the Report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the Company as of the date and for the periods reported therein.

      3. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-14 under the Exchange Act) for the Company, and we have (a) designed
those disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the Company is made known to us by other personnel employed by the
Company, particularly within the Reporting Period, (b) evaluated the
effectiveness of those disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of the Report (the "Effective Date") and (c)
presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of those
disclosure controls and procedures.

      4. Based on our most recent evaluation, the Company's other certifying
officer and I have disclosed to the Company's auditors and the audit committee
of the Company's board of directors (a) all significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of internal controls that could adversely affect the
Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data, (b)
any material weakness in the Company's internal controls and (c) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Company's internal controls.

      5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective action with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ William S. Daugherty

William S. Daugherty
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
November 10, 2003
Exhibit 10.25



 





Exhibit 10.25



Description of Measures for Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards No.
8, 9 and 11



The material terms of these awards are described below. For each award, fifty percent of the units
awarded is based on achievement of a target annual compounded increase in basic earnings per share
(EPS). For this 50% portion, an EPS performance of 80% of target results in an 80% payout, an EPS
performance of 100% of target results in a 100% payout and an EPS performance of 120% of target
results in a maximum 120% payout, and EPS performance levels between these levels will be subject
to mathematical interpolation. EPS performance below 80% of target results in no payout of this
portion.



The other 50% of the units awarded is based on the registrant’s percentile ranking for total annual
shareholder return performance (increase in the registrant’s common stock price plus dividends paid
over the specified period of time) in comparison to the group of companies that formerly comprised
the A. G. Edwards Large Natural Gas Distribution Index (“Peer Group”). For this 50% portion, a
ranking below the 25th percentile results in no payout, a ranking between the 25th and 39th
percentile results in an 80% payout, a ranking between the 40th and 49th percentile results in a
90% payout, a ranking between the 50th and 74th percentile results in a 100% payout, a ranking
between the 75th and 89th percentile results in a 110% payout, and a ranking at or above the 90th
percentile results in a maximum 120% payout.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Target annual compounded
	Long-Term Incentive	 	 	 	increase in basic earnings per
	Plan Award Number	 	Performance Period	 	share
	No. 8

	 	Three-year period
ended October 31,
2007
	 	 	5	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	No. 9

	 	Three-year period
ending October 31,
2008
	 	 	5	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	No. 11

	 	Three-year period
ending October 31,
2010
	 	 	4	%
Meeting to Discuss MACT Data and MACT Analysis 

Proposed Portland Cement NESHAP 

July 6, 2009

Meeting Date: July 6, 2009 

Participants: 

US EPA

Keith Barnett, SPPD 

RTI

Marvin Branscome 

Mike Laney 

Cement Industry

Hector Ybanez, Holcim 

William Mills, Mills Consulting 

Kyle Hilst, Mills Consulting 

(By Telephone) 

Curtis Lesslie, Ash Grove 

Nancy Garnett, TXI 

Greg Mayes, TXI 

Brett Lindsay, Phoenix Cement 

GaryMolchen, Essroc 

John Holmes, Consultant to PCA 

Bret Lindsey, Phoenix Cement 

This meeting continued discussions that were initiated at a June 10, 2009 meeting 

between EPA and the portland cement industry to address questions from the industry 

over the data and the methods of analysis used to develop the MACT floor emission 

limits proposed on June 6, 2009. 

For all of the PM emissions data EPA considered in the development of the MACT floor 

emission limits, the industry would like to be able to recreate the calculations starting 

with the raw test data, including identification of the test reports or other sources the raw 

data were taken from, as well as the factors used to convert test data into the format used 

for the proposed PM emission limits, i.e., lbs/ton of clinker. Industry requested that EPA 

supply spreadsheets that show these calculations as well as identify the sources of the 

data, either the docket identification number or a copy of the data. There was also 

discussion of the appropriateness of the OSW statistical method that EPA used to 

estimate variability and the upper prediction limit for the PM emissions data. 

The industry made a similar request for the mercury emissions data. Specifically, they 

would like to see the calculations used to convert industry reported daily mercury 

concentrations and annual raw material and fuel usage into daily mercury emissions. The 

industry was also seeking clarification of instances in which mercury emissions from 
minor raw materials (i.e., materials other than limestone, clay, shale, sand, fly ash, and 

iron ore) were combined into a single category of “other raw materials.” Industry 

discussed what statistical methods may be appropriate for the mercury data set. 

Industry’s concern with the THC data is that the amount of data used in EPA’s analysis 

resulted in two kilns being used in the development of MACT for existing sources. They 

also discussed the appropriateness of the OSW method for this type of data. 

 EPA provided clarifications about the statistical analysis for the MACT floor related to 

the use of the methodology developed by OSW for cement kilns burning hazardous 

waste, assumptions about the type of distribution and the use of a normal distribution, the 

effect of averaging over 30 days, and how well the mercury content of limestone 

correlates with emissions for the MACT floor facilities.