UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K



[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010



[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period from __________ to __________



Commission File No.  333-140236



ZENTRIC, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)





Nevada(State or other jurisdiction of  Incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)




Unit C2, 802 Southdown Road,

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5J 2Y4

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)



(416) 245-8000

(Issuers telephone number)



1310 Contour Drive

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5H 1B2

(Former name, address and fiscal year, if changed since last report)





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act [  ] Yes [x ] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act [  ] Yes [x ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [  ] No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]



1



---





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", and "smaller reporting company" in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [  ] Accelerated filer [  ]

Non-accelerated filer [  ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [x]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [  ] Yes [X] No

As of April 14, 2011 60,973,219 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.





2



---





TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I



Item 1.

Business

4

Item 1A

Risk Factors

4

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 2.

Properties

4

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

4

Item 4.

Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders

4



PART II



Item 5.

Market For Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

5

Item 6

Selected Financial Data

Item 7.

Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

6

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

12

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9A (T)

Control and Procedures

28

Item 9B.

Other Information



PART III



Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

29

Item 11

Executive Compensation

31

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

31

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

32

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees And Services

32

Item 15

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

33



SIGNATURES

33









3



---





ITEM 1.    Description of Business.



General

Zentric, Inc. (the "Company"), was incorporated on July 21, 2008, under the laws of the State of Nevada as Constant Environment, Inc. and changed its name to Zentric, Inc. on December 16, 2009. The company is an advanced battery technology company based on a new and revolutionary technology that incorporates high voltages dual electrolytes to produce higher voltages and power.

On October 15, 2010, Zentric, Inc. entered into a joint venture agreement with Hengxin Group and Jet Glory Asia Group Limited to develop and operate a battery manufacturing plant in Jilin, China.  As of December 31, 2010 there have been no assets, liabilities and operations within the joint venture. Per the agreement, the new joint venture company ownership will be: ZENTRIC (or any affiliated company designated by Zentric):  70%;  HENGXIN (and/or its Associates): 20%; and Jet Glory (or its Associates): 10%.



Business Division



The business of Constant Environment remains as a division of Zentric. The division is a separate business that provides microclimate systems to specialty markets, who have a need to protect and preserve rare and/or valuable items.



Employees, Officers and Directors

Employees



We have no employees as of the date of this prospectus other than our sole executive officer and directors who devote only part of their time to our business.





Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.



Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not Applicable



Item 2.  Properties.

Our mailing address is Unit C2, 802 Southdown Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5J 2Y4, for which we pay $2,298.63 Cdn per month for a one year term.

Effective January 1, 2010, we agreed to lease the approximately 1,420 square feet of space (Leased Space) for a 5 years term. The Leased Space to be suitable for, and utilized by us for our administration, management and development.

We do not intend to renovate, improve, or develop properties. We are not subject to competitive conditions for property and currently have no property in insure. We have no policy with respect to investments in real estate or interests in real estate and no policy with respect to investments in real estate mortgages. Further, we have no policy with respect to investments in securities of or interests in persons primarily engaged in real estate activities.





4



---





Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.



There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company.



Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

During the period ending December 31, 2010, there has not been any matter which was submitted to a vote of the Companys shareholders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.



PART II



Item 5.  Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.



Market Information



There is no trading market for our Common Stock at present and there has been no trading market to date. There is no assurance that a trading market will ever develop or, if such a market does develop, that it will continue.



The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a penny stock, for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (i) that a broker or dealer approve a persons account for transactions in penny stocks and (ii) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased. In order to approve a persons account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must (i) obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person; and (ii) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks. The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, (i) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination and (ii) that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.



Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading, and about commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.



Holders

As of April 14, 2011there were 60,973,219 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, 25,000,000 of which are controlled by Jeff Mak, the Company's officer and director.



As of April 14, 2011 there were 43 holders of record of shares of our common stock.  Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights.



Therefore, holders of a majority of the shares of common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors. Holders of our common stock representing a majority of the voting power of our capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, are necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting of our stockholders. A vote by the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain fundamental
corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation.





5



---









Although there are no provisions in our charter or by-laws that may delay, defer or prevent a change in control, we are authorized, without shareholder approval, to issue shares of preferred stock that may contain rights or restrictions that could have this effect.



Holders of common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. Holders of our common stock have no pre-emptive rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions applicable to our common stock.



The issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock were issued in accordance with the exemptions from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.



Dividends



Since inception we have not paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future.



Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.



Item 6. Selected Financial Data

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.



Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.



Safe Harbor Statement under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995



Certain statements contained in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-K constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, regulatory and economic factors, seasonality, competition, litigation, the nature of supplier or customer arrangements that become available to the Company in the future, adverse weather conditions, possible technological obsolescence of existing products and services, possible reduction in the carrying value of long-lived assets, estimates of the useful life of its assets, potential environmental liability, customer concentration, the ability to obtain financing, and other risks detailed in this report and in the Company's other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "may", "plan", "should" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.



Critical Accounting Policies



The Company's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. Several of the Company's accounting policies involve significant judgments, uncertainties and estimations. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. To the extent that actual results differ from management's judgments and estimates, there could be a material adverse effect on the Company. On a continuous basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including, but not limited to, those estimates related to its allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets relating to its net operating loss carry forwards ("NOL's") and commitments and contingencies. With respect to accounts receivable, the Company estimates the necessary allowance for doubtful accounts based on both historical and anticipated trends of payment history and the ability of the customer to fulfill its obligations. For inventory, the Company evaluates both current and anticipated sales prices of its products to determine if a write down of inventory to net realizable value is necessary. In determining the Company's valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets, the Company assesses its ability to generate taxable income in the future. The Company utilizes both internal and external sources to evaluate potential current and future liabilities for various commitments and contingencies. In the event that the assumptions or conditions change in the future, the estimates could differ from the original estimates.



6



---









The accounting policies of the company are in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles.  Outlined below are those policies considered particularly significant:



Organization and Start Up Costs



Costs of start up activities, including organization costs are expensed as incurred.



Cash and Cash Equivalents



Cash and cash equivalents consist of commercial accounts and interest-bearing bank deposits and are carried at cost, which approximates current value. Items are considered to be cash equivalents if the original maturity is three months or less.



Income Taxes



Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial statements and tax basis of the assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.  Income tax expense is recorded for the amount of income tax payable or refundable for the period increased or decreased by the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period.  As of December 31, 2010, a deferred tax asset (which arises solely as a result of net operating losses), has been entirely offset by a valuation reserve due to the uncertainty that this asset will be realized in the future.



Fair Value of Financial Instruments



The carrying value of the Company's accounts payable approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.



Earnings or Loss Per Share



Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus common stock equivalents (if dilutive) related to stock options and warrants for each year.



There were no dilutive financial instruments for the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009.



Deferred Offering Costs



The Company defers as other assets the direct incremental costs of raising capital until such time as the offering is completed.  At the time of the completion of the offering, the costs are charged against the capital raised.  Should the offering be terminated, deferred offering costs are charged to operations during the period in which the offering is terminated.







7



---







Revenue Recognition



Revenue is recognized when it is realized or realizable and earned. Zentric, Inc. considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been provided, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue that is billed in advance such as recurring weekly or monthly services are initially deferred and recognized as revenue over the period the services are provided.



The Company currently has one revenue stream which is providing information technology consulting services.  These revenues are recognized on completion of the services rendered.  The customers are billed on completion and are due on receipt.





Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18 regarding improving comparability by eliminating diversity in practice about the treatment of modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30  Receivable  Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (Subtopic 310-30). Furthermore, the amendments clarify guidance about maintaining the integrity of a pool as the unit of accounting for acquired loans with credit deterioration.  Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40, ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in this Update are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.



In March 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-11 (ASU 2010-11), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The amendments in this Update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entitys first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this Update. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-11 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash

flows of the Company.



In February 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10), Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds. The amendments in this Update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entitys first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within that first reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Companys adoption of provisions of ASU 2010-10 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (ASU No. 2010-09). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption did not have an impact on the Companys financial position and results of operations.



In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and
non-recurring fair value measurements and employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.





8



---









In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 505, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a

significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.



In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.



In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.



In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.



In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides additional guidance on how companies should measure liabilities at fair value under ASC 820. The ASU clarifies that the quoted price for an identical liability should be used. However, if such information is not available, an entity may use the quoted price of an identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities traded as assets, or another valuation technique (such as the market or income approach). The ASU also indicates that the fair value of a liability is not adjusted to reflect the impact of contractual restrictions that prevent its transfer and indicates circumstances in which quoted prices for an identical liability or quoted price for an identical liability traded as an asset may be considered level 1 fair value measurements. This ASU is effective October 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the results of operations or financial condition.



In June 2009 the FASB established the Accounting Standards Codification ("Codification'" or "ASC") as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of GAAP for SEC registrants. Existing GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the Codification, and accordingly the change did not impact our financial statements. The ASC does change the way the guidance is organized and presented.



9



---







In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which is included in ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events. ASC Topic 855 established principles and requirements for evaluating and reporting subsequent events and distinguishes which subsequent events should be recognized in the financial statements versus which subsequent events should be disclosed in the financial statements. ASC Topic 855 also requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events are evaluated by management. ASC Topic 855 was effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009 and applies prospectively. Because ASC Topic 855 impacts the disclosure requirements, and not the accounting treatment for subsequent events, the adoption of ASC Topic 855 did not impact our results of operations or financial condition. See Note 9 for disclosures regarding our subsequent events.



Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") ASU No. 2009-05 (ASC Topic 820), which amends Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures - Overall, ASU No. 2009-13 (ASC Topic 605), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue arrangements, ASU No. 2009-14 (ASC Topic 985), Certain Revenue Arrangements that include Software Elements, and various other ASU's No. 2009-2 through ASU No. 2009-15 which contain technical corrections to existing guidance or affect guidance to specialized industries or entities were recently issued. These updates have no current applicability to the Company or their effect on the financial statements would not have been significant.



The Company does not expect that adoption of these or other recently issued accounting pronouncements will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



Overview

Zentric, Inc. (the "Company"), was incorporated on July 21, 2008, under the laws of the State of Nevada as Constant Environment, Inc. and changed its name to Zentric, Inc. on December 16, 2009. The company is an advanced battery technology company based on a new and revolutionary technology that incorporates high voltages dual electrolytes to produce higher voltages and power.

The address of our principal executive office is Unit C2, 802 Southdown Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5J 2Y4. Our phone number at that location is 416-245-8000. Our website is www.zbatt.com.



License Agreement with Versitech Limited



Effective December 14, 2009, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with Versitech Limited to design, manufacture and market the battery technology under United State Patent Grant No. 7,344,801. Terms of the license are royalties of 3% on net sales on the licensed products by the licensee and affiliates of licensed products and 25% of all sublicense income received by the licensee or any of its affiliates.



The invention is directed to electrochemical device such as batteries and fuel cells having two electrolytes between the anode and the cathode. The devices of this invention can have 50% higher operating voltage and power compared to devices with a single electrolyte. The electrochemical device according to the present invention is preferably arranged with an alkaline electrolyte in contact with the anode and an acidic electrolyte in contact with the cathode. The electrolytes are separated by a bipolar membrane that preferably also provides ionic conductivity between the two electrolytes and also generates a supply of protons and hydroxide anions.



Business division



The business of Constant Environment remains as a division of Zentric. The division is a product and services company that provides microclimate systems to specialty markets, who have a need to protect and preserve rare and/or valuable items.



The division will earn revenue for services including; (i) the sale of microclimate solutions (ii) the installation of microclimate systems (iii) consulting services, including assessments and project management. The division will offer services in the microclimate industry; design, manage, install, repair, service and provide maintenance for our customers with the same processes, personnel and management.



10



---







In addition to the services the division will provide, the division plans to produce microclimate systems that are involved in our project installations. The division plans to assemble the products in house with the technical assistance of Micro Climate Technology for small quantity orders. For larger quantity orders, the division plans to outsource the manufacturing to OEM manufacturers.

A microclimate is the environment immediately surrounding an artifact. A microclimate can be created and controlled in a sealed showcase, storage cabinet or archive room.



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



The Company did not generate any revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.



Professional fees include legal and accounting fees and filing fees. Professional fees for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $3,232 and $39,484 respectively.



Consulting and contracting expenses for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $658,096 and $69,000.



Office and general expenses for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $43,442 and $9,209.



Loss on stock issued for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $73,321 and $0.



Services contributed by shareholder for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $300,000 and $0.



Net loss for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $801,073 and $125,173 respectively.  The loss was primarily due to the consultant and subcontracting fees.



Loss per share was $0.02 and $0.00 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.





LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES



As of December 31, 2010, we had a working capital deficiency of $194,271, which represented a working capital decrease of $71,963 as compared to the working capital deficiency position of $122,308 as of December 31, 2009. The decrease is mainly due to the increase of our accounts payable and short-term related party note payable. We did not raise any cash from issuance of common stock.



Cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was ($95,084). Cash flows provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $98,451, which was due to stockholder contributions and borrowings on debt.



On March 25, 2010 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Lucilla Ho wherein she agreed to loan the Company $20,000 at an annual interest rate of 15% and she will receive 50,000 shares of the Companys common stock. Such shares shall be restricted in accordance with Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933.  The shares are valued at the fair market value at the date of the agreement and treated as a discount, net of total loan received.  The discount is amortized over the term of the note using straight line.  A copy of the Loan Agreement is attached as exhibit 10.3.



On April 20, 2010 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Zmt Limited wherein agreed to loan the Company $8,000 with an annual interest rate of 15%.  The loan is not convertible with a maturity of one year.



On July 27, 2010 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Zmt Limited wherein agreed to loan the Company $2,018 with an annual interest rate of 15%. The loan is not convertible with a maturity of one year.



11



---







On November 3, 2010 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Zmt Limited wherein agreed to loan the Company $5,000 with an annual interest rate of 15%. The loan is not convertible with a maturity of one year.



We anticipate that our operational, general and administrative expenses for the next 12 months will total $440,920.00. The estimated breakdown is as follows:



|                                  |  |   |            | 
|--------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- | 
|                                 
|Web Development                   |  | $ | 10,000.00  | 
|Legal/Accounting                  |  | $ | 15,000.00  | 
|Upgraded Computer systems         |  | $ | 12,500.00  | 
|Telecommunications/DSL            |  | $ | 900.00     | 
|Employee recruitment and training |  | $ | 30,000.00  | 
|General Administrative            |  |   |            | 
|Advertising                       |  | $ | 50,000.00  | 
|Automotive                        |  | $ | 10,000.00  | 
|Deprecation expense               |  | $ | 1,270.00   | 
|Employee benefits                 |  | $ | 1,500.00   | 
|Entertainment                     |  | $ | 9,000.00   | 
|Insurance                         |  | $ | 8,000.00   | 
|Office salaries                   |  | $ | 180,000.00 | 
|Office supplies                   |  | $ | 7,000.00   | 
|Professional expense              |  | $ | 8,000.00   | 
|Rent                              |  | $ | 30,000.00  | 
|Repairs & Maintenance             |  | $ | 1,500.00   | 
|Taxes                             |  | $ | 6,250.00   | 
|Telephone                         |  | $ | 6,000.00   | 
|Travel                            |  | $ | 50,000.00  | 
|Utilities                         |  | $ | 4,000.00   | 
|Total General Administrative      |  | $ | 372,520.00 | 
|                                  |  |   |            | 
|Total Expenses                    |  | $ | 440,920.00 | 



We will not generate any revenues in the next twelve months and we will be required to raise additional capital by issuing equity or debt securities in exchange for cash in order to continue as a going concern. We can not assure you that any financing can be obtained or, if obtained, that it will be on reasonable terms. Without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for us to continue as a going concern.





Going Concern Consideration



Our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their report on the financial statements included herein regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



We have no off-balance sheet arrangements

12



---







Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.



13



---









Item 8. Financial Statements.



ZENTRIC, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 and 2009

AND THE PERIOD FROM JULY 21, 2008 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2010





14



---









REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors

Zentric, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)



We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Zentric, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the period from July 21, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.



We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Zentric, Inc., as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods described above in conformity with U.S. generally accepted principles.



The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company suffered a net loss from operations and has a net deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.



/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC



www.mkacpas.com

Houston, Texas

April 11, 2011











15



---







ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS



|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------- | --------- | - | ----------------- | - | --------- | 
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  | December, 31 2010 |           |   | December, 31 2009 |  
|ASSETS                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                   |           |   |                   |  
|Current Assets                                                                                                                                                           |  |                   |           |   |                   |  
|Cash                                                                                                                                                                     |  | $                 | 3,367     |   |                   | $ | -         | 
|Prepaid Expenses                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   | 100       |   |                   |   | 4,767     | 
|Total Current Assets                                                                                                                                                     |  |                   | 3,467     |   |                   |   | 4,767     | 
|Total Assets                                                                                                                                                             |  | $                 | 3,467     |   |                   | $ | 4,767     | 
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT                                                                                                                                    |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|Current Liabilities                                                                                                                                                      |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                                                                                                                                 |  | $                 | 52,678    |   |                   | $ | 6,560     | 
|Advances from related party                                                                                                                                              |  |                   | 55,018    |   |                   |   | 31,565    | 
|Note payable, net discount                                                                                                                                               |  |                   | 90,042    |   |                   |   | 88,950    | 
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|Total Liabilities                                                                                                                                                        |  |                   | 197,738   |   |                   |   | 127,075   | 
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|Stockholders' Deficit                                                                                                                                                    |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|Common stock,  $0.001 par value,  100,000,000 shares authorized;
60,937,3219 and 49,128,000 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively |  |                   | 60,973    |   |                   |   | 49,128    | 
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                                               |  |                   | 696,002   |   |                   |   | (21,263)  | 
|Deficit accumulated during the development stage                                                                                                                         |  |                   | (951,246  | ) |                   |   | (150,173) | 
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|Total Stockholders' Deficit                                                                                                                                              |  |                   | (194,271) |   |                   |   | (122,308) | 
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                   |           |   |                   |   |           | 
|Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit                                                                                                                              |  | $                 | 3,467     |   |                   | $ | 4,767     | 







The accompanying notes are an integral part to these financial statements.



16



---









ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS





|                                                                   |  |                                |           |                                |                    |                                                                     |   |           | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------ | --------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | --------- | 
|                                                                   |  | Year Ended  December 31,  2010 |           | Year Ended  December 31,  2009 |                    | For The Period From Inception (July 21, 2008) to  December, 31 2010 |  
|REVENUE                                                            |  | $                              | -         |                                | $                - |                                                                     | $ | -         | 
|OPERATING EXPENSES                                                 |  |                                |           |                                |                    |                                                                     |   |           | 
|Consulting and sub-contracting                                     |  |                                | 658,096   |                                | 69,000             |                                                                     |   | 742,096   | 
|Office and General                                                 |  |                                | 43,442    |                                | 9,209              |                                                                     |   | 52,651    | 
|Professional fees                                                  |  |                                | 3,232     |                                | 39,484             |                                                                     |   | 52,216    | 
|Loss on stock issued                                               |  |                                | 73,321    |                                | -                  |                                                                     |   | 73,321    | 
|Bank charges                                                       |  |                                | 350       |                                | -                  |                                                                     |   | 430       | 
|LOSS BEFORE OTHER EXPENSE                                          |  |                                | 778,441   |                                | 117,693            |                                                                     |   | 920,714   | 
|Other Expense                                                      |  |                                |           |                                |                    |                                                                     |   |           | 
|Interest expense                                                   |  |                                | 22,632    |                                | 7,480              |                                                                     |   | 30,532    | 
|NET LOSS                                                           |  | $                              | (801,073) |                                | (125,173)          |                                                                     | $ | (951,246) | 
|                                                                   |  |                                |           |                                |                    |                                                                     |   |           | 
|LOSS PER WEIGHTED NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED |  | $                              | (0.02)    |                                | (0.00)             |                                                                     |   |           | 
|                                                                   |  |                                |           |                                |                    |                                                                     |   |           | 
|WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED  |  | 50,083,632                     |           | 49,128,000                     |                    |                                                                     |   |          





The accompanying notes are an integral part to these financial statements.







17



---







ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   
|----------------------------------------------------- | - | --------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------
|                                                      |   |                       |                    | July 21, 2008     
|                                                      |   |                       |                    | (Inception)       
|                                                      |   | Year Ended            | Year Ended         | Through           
|                                                      |   | December 31, 2010     | December 31, 2009  | December 31, 2010 
|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   
|Cash Flows from Operating Activities                  |   |                       |                    |                   
|Net loss                                              | $ | (801,073)             | $        (125,173) | $        (951,246)
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by |   |                       |                    |                   
|Operating activities:                                 |   |                       |                    |                   
|Common stock issued for services                      |   | 569,365               | 2,500              | 586,865           
|Loss on Conversion of Debt                            |   | 73,321                | -                  | 73,321            
|Imputed interest on advance from shareholder          |   | 3,620                 | 1,550              | 5,590             
|Amortization on note discount                         |   | 1,575                 | 550                | 2,125             
|Changes in assets and liabilities                     |   |                       |                    |                   
|Prepaid Expenses                                      |   | 4,667                 | (4,767)            | (100)             
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities              |   | 35,984                | 1,712              | 60,001            
|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   
|Cash flows used in operating activities               |   | (95,084)              | (118,780)          | (223,444)         
|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   
|Cash Flows from Financing Activities                  |   |                       |                    |                   
|Proceeds from issuance of common stock                |   | -                     | -                  | 6,795             
|Advances from related party                           |   | 58,433                | 25,565             | 89,998            
|Borrowings on debt  related party                    |   | 40,018                | 90,000             | 130,018           
|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   
|Cash flows provided by financing  activities          |   | 98,451                | 115,565            | 226,811           
|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   
|Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash                       |   | 3,367                 | (3,215)            | (3,367            
|Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year          |   | -                     | 3,215              | -                 
|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   
|Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year                |   | $          
    3,367 | $             -    | $            3,367
|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   
|Supplemental Disclosures                              |   |                       |                    |                   
|Interest Paid                                         |   | -                     | -                  | -                 
|Income tax Paid                                       |   | -                     | -                  | -                 
|Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities           |   |                       |                    |                   
|Forgiveness of related party debt                     |   | 35,000                | -                  | 35,000            
|Stock issued as incentive on loan                     |   | 500                   | 1,600              | 2,100             
|                                                      |   |                       |                    |                   







The accompanying notes are an integral part to these financial statements.





18



---





ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Deficit)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM July 21, 2008 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010



|                                             |  |              |            |                    |   |                                |  |                   |          |                                |   |           |  |   |           | 
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ---------- | ------------------ | - | ------------------------------ |  | ----------------- | -------- | ------------------------------ | - | --------- |  | - | --------- | 
|                                             |  | Common Stock |            | Additional
Paid-In |   | Deficit Accumulated
During the |  |                   |         
|                                             |  | Shares       |            | Amount             |   | Capital                        |  | Development Stage |          | Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) |  
|Common shares issued at inception            |  |              | 40,000,000 |                    | $ | 40,000                         |  | $                 | (40,000  | )                              | $ | -         |  | $ | -         | 
|Common shares issued for cash                |  |              | 2,718,000  |                    |   | 2,718                          |  |                   | 4,077    |                                |   | -         |  |   | 6,795     | 
|Common shares issued for services            |  |              | 6,000,000  |                    |   | 6,000                          |  |                   | 9,000    |                                |   |           |  |   | 15,000    | 
|Imputed interest on shareholder advance      |  |              | -          |                    |   | -                              |  |                   | 420      |                                |   |           |  |   | 420       | 
|Net loss                                     |  |              | -          |                    |   | -                              |  |                   | -        |                                |   | (25,000)  |  |   | (25,000)  | 
|Balance, 31 December 2008                    |  |              | 48,718,000 |                    |   | 48,718                         |  |                   | (25,503  |                                |   | (25,000)  |  |   | (2,785)   | 
|Common shares issued for services            |  |              | 250,000    |                    |   | 250                            |  |                   | 2,250    |                                |   | -         |  |   | 2,500     | 
|Shares issued as loan incentives             |  |              | 160,000    |                    |   | 160                            |  |                   | 1,440    |                                |   | -         |  |   | 1,600     | 
|Imputed interest on shareholder advance      |  |              | -          |                    |   | -                              |  |                   | 1,550    |                                |   | -         |  |   | 1,550     | 
|Net loss                                     |  |              | -          |                    |   | -                              |  |                   | -        |                                |   | (125,173) |  |   | (125,173) | 
|Balance, 31 December 2009                    |  |              | 49,128,000 |                    |   | 49,128                         |  |                   | (21,263) |                                |   | (150,173) |  |   | (122,308) | 
|Common shares issued for services            |  |              | 9,430,000  |                    |   | 9,430                          |  |                   | 559,935  |                                |   | -         |  |   | 569,365   | 
|Common shares issued for debt conversion     |  |              | 2,365,219  |                    |   | 2,365                          |  |                   | 118,260  |                                |   | -         |  |   | 118,260   | 
|Shares issued as loan incentives             |  |              | 50,000     |                    |   | 50                             |  |                   | 450      |                                |   |           |  |   | 500       | 
|Imputed interest on advance from shareholder |  |              | -          |                    |   | -                              |  |                   | 3,620    |                                |   | -         |  |   | 1,945     | 
|Forgiveness of debt  related party          |  |              | -          |                    |   | -                              |  |                   | 35,000   |                                |   | -         |  |   | 1,945     | 
|Net loss                                     |  |              | -          |                    |   | -                              |  |                   | -        |                                |   | (801,073) |  |   | (801,073) | 
|Balance, 31 December 2010                    |  |              | 60,973,219 |                    | $ | 60,973                         |  | $                 | 696,002  |                                | $ | (951,246) |  | $ | (194,271) | 

























The accompanying notes are an integral part to these financial statements.









19



---





ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2010



1.

ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION



Constant Environment, Inc. (the "Company"), was incorporated on July 21, 2008, under the laws of the State of Nevada as an early stage product and services company that provides microclimate systems to specialty markets, who have a need to protect and preserve rare and/or valuable items.



On December 16, 2009 the Board of Directors of Constant Environment, Inc. (the Company) filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada changing the Companys name to Zentric, Inc



On October 15, 2010, Zentric, Inc. entered into a joint venture agreement with Hengxin Group and Jet Glory Asia Group Limited to develop and operate a battery manufacturing plant in Jilin, China.



2.

GOING CONCERN



The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America with the assumption that the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.  The Company suffered a net loss from operations and has a net deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.



The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon its ability to complete public equity financing and generate profitable operations in the future.  Management's plan in this regard is to secure additional funds through equity financing and through loans made by the Company's stockholders.



3.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a)    Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Companys fiscal year-end is December 31.



b)   
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Companys estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.



c)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had no cash equivalents.



20



---





ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2010







d)

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.



e)

Income Taxes

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740, Income Taxes, as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.



f)

Comprehensive Loss

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at December 31, 2010, the Company has no items that represent comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.



g)

Financial Instruments

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and ASC 825, Financial Instruments,requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. It establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. It prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Companys financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable, and amounts due to related parties. The fair value of our cash is determined based on Level 1 inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.





21



---





ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2010



h)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18 regarding improving comparability by eliminating diversity in practice about the treatment of modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30  Receivable  Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (Subtopic 310-30). Furthermore, the amendments clarify guidance about maintaining the integrity of a pool as the unit of accounting for acquired loans with credit deterioration.  Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40, ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in this Update are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.



In March 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-11 (ASU 2010-11), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The amendments in this Update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entitys first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this Update. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-11 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.



In February 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10), Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds. The amendments in this Update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entitys first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within that first reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Companys adoption of provisions of ASU 2010-10 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (ASU No. 2010-09). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption did not have an impact on the Companys financial position and results of operations.



In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements and employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.



In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 505, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.



In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures and improvement in the disclosure about fair value measurements. This ASU requires additional disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of fair value measurements, including a description of the reasons for the transfers.  Further, this ASU requires additional disclosures for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements,
requiring presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of this
ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.





22



---









In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.



In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.



On September 30, 2009, the Company adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to the authoritative hierarchy of GAAP. These changes establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will not be authoritative in their own right as they will only serve to update the Codification. These changes and the Codification itself do not change GAAP. Other than the manner in which new accounting guidance is referenced, the adoption of these changes had no impact on the Companys financial statements.



In August 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This standard is effective for the Company on October 1, 2009. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.



In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.



In May 2009, FASB issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events, which establishes general standards of for the evaluation, recognition and disclosure of events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. Although there is new terminology, the standard is based on the same principles as those that currently exist in the auditing standards. The standard, which includes a new required disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events, is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855-10 did not have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.





23



---









The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operation



4.

STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY



Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held. There are no restrictions that limit the Companys ability to pay dividends on its common stock. The Company has not declared any dividends since incorporation.

On July 23, 2008, we issued a total of 40,000,000 shares (adjusted retroactively for 4:1 split) worth $10,000 to Jeff Mak for services rendered as our founder with respect to the incorporation and set-up of Constant Environment. Such shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Mr. Mak is deemed our founder and promoter.

On August 20, 2008, we issued 2,000,000 shares (adjusted retroactively for 4:1 split) to Ka Leung Mak for business development services in China. Such shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 25, 2008, we issued 2,000,000 shares (adjusted retroactively for 4:1 split) to Kwok Kwong Chan for services as a director/secretary. Such shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 25, 2008, we issued 2,000,000 shares (adjusted retroactively for 4:1 split) to Domenic Macchione for sales and marketing services. Such shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

For the period ended December 31, 2008, we issued 2,718,000 shares (adjusted retroactively for 4:1 split) of common stock to 40 investors in a private placement.  The consideration paid for such shares was $0.01 per share, amounting in the aggregate to $6,795.

A 4 for 1 forward split of our common stock was deemed effective on August 5, 2009.  The Company had 12,179,500 shares outstanding prior to the split, and will have 48,878,000 shares outstanding following the split.

On July 27, 2009 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Lucilla Ho wherein she agreed to loan the Company $20,000 and she will receive 5,000 shares of the Companys common stock. Such shares shall be restricted in accordance with Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933.  The shares were value at the last sell price of common stock for cash at $0.01 and treated as a discount on the note.  A copy of the Loan Agreement is attached as exhibit 10.3.

On August 7, 2009 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with 1456146 Ontario Limited of which Fred Lai is the principal.  The 1456146 Ontario Limited agreed to loan the Company $50,000 and 1456146 Ontario Limited will receive 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock. Such shares shall be restricted in accordance with Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933.  The shares were value at the last sell price of common stock for cash at $0.01 and treated as a discount on the note.  A copy of the Loan Agreement is attached as exhibit 10.4.

On August 15, 2009 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Ricky Wu wherein he agreed to loan the Company $20,000 and he will receive 40,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Such shares shall be restricted in accordance with Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933. The shares were value at the last sell price of common stock for cash at $0.01 and treated as a discount on the note.  A copy of the Loan Agreement is attached as exhibit 10.5.



24



---





ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2010



On March 25, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement with a shareholder wherein they agreed to loan us $25,000 and received 50,000 shares of our common stock as an incentive for providing the loan.  The shares were value at the last sell price of common stock for cash at $0.01 and treated as a discount on the note.



On October 1, 2010, holders of the Companys notes elected to convert loans into 2,365,219 shares of our common stock for $47,130 of principal and interest.  Shares were valued based on fair market value of conversion and as a result the company recorded a loss of $73,321on conversion of debt.



On October 1, 2010, the Company issued 9,200,000 shares of our common stock for $460,000 consulting services.  Shares were valued based on fair market value on the date of authorization.



On December 1 2010, the Companys board of directors declared to issue 230,000 shares of our common stock for $23,000 consulting services.  Shares were valued based on fair market value on the date of authorization.



5.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS



Related party transactions are in the normal course of operations and are recorded at amounts established and agreed between the related parties. Related party transactions not disclosed elsewhere in these consolidated financial statements are as follows:



The Company has received cash advances of $23,453 and $25,565 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively from a director and shareholder.



The Company received a short-term advance from a related party of $35,000 during the year to pay for expenses, the loan was forgiven and written off to additional paid-in capital.



Interest has been imputed at 10% resulting in interest expense of $3,620 and $1,550 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.



As seen in Note 6 below, the company received loan from shareholders of $40,018 during the year ended December 31, 2010.



6.

NOTE PAYABLE



During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued the following notes:



On March 25, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement with a shareholder wherein they agreed to loan us $25,000 bearing 15% interest rate and due in one year.  As an incentive to providing the loan to the company, 50,000 shares of common stock was issued at a value of $.01 per share resulting in a discount of $500 which is being amortized using straight-line during the term of the loan.



On April 20, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement for $8,000 bearing 15% interest rate.



On July 27, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement for $2,018 bearing 15% interest rate.



On October 1, 2010, $47,130 of principal and accrued interest was converted into 2,365,219 shares of our common stock Shares were valued based on fair market value of conversion and as a result the company recorded a loss of $73,321on conversion of debt.





25



---





ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2010



On November 3, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement for $5,000 bearing 15% interest rate.



On December, 6, 2010, the Company received a short-term advance from a related party of $25,000 to pay for expenses, the loan was forgiven and written off to additional paid-in capital.



On December, 6, 2010, the Company received a short-term advance from a related party of $10,000 to pay for expenses, the loan was forgiven and written off to additional paid-in capital.



Interest accrual for all loans outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 is $14,981 and $5,380, respectively.



7.

PATENT



On December 14, 2009, Zentric , Inc. (Company) entered into a License Agreement with Versitech Limited, whereby the company agrees to purchase patent rights from Versitech to design, manufacture and market the battery technology under United State Patent Grant No. 7,344,801.  Various payments at different milestone are due at different dates totalling $150,000 in addition to reimbursing Versitech of any expenses in connection with filing, prosecuting and maintaining patent rights. All payments rendered are non-refundable.  If the agreement is terminated, the Company will no longer be liable for future Milestone payments.  Milestone payments are due as stated below:



First Milestone

-

$10,000 30 days from the effective date

-

$20,000 60 days from the effective date

-

$20,000 90 days from the effective date

Second Milestone

-

$10,000 due on or before December 19, 2010 (1st anniversary)

Third Milestone

-

$20,000 due on or before December 19, 2011 (2nd anniversary)

Fourth Milestone

-

$30,000 due on or before December 19, 2012 (3rd anniversary)

Fifth Milestone (Final Payment)

-

$40,000 due on or before December 19, 2013 (4th anniversary)

As December 31, 2010, the Company has paid a total of $72,000 whereby $67,000 is applicable to Milestone payments and $5,000 toward accrued reimbursement payable of $28,731 incurred.  As of year end, the Company has an outstanding balance of $23,731 due to Versitech that is included in Account Payable.



The company evaluated the Patent for impairment and concluded that due to lack of current investing and financing activities the possibility of meeting reimbursement and Milestone payments can be deterred.  As such the Company is expensing payments and reimbursement as incurred and come due.



8.

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION



No interest or taxes were paid by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and from inception to December 31, 2009.



26



---





ZENTRIC, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010





9.

INCOME TAXES



The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10, which requires use of the liability method. FASB ASC 740-10-25 provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences.



As of December 31, 2010, there were no differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company will have tax losses available to be applied against future years income as result of the losses incurred. However, due to the losses incurred in the period and expected future operating results, management determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset resulting from the tax losses available for carryforward will not be realized through the reduction of future income tax payments. Accordingly a 100% valuation allowance has been recorded for deferred income tax assets. The net loss carryforward was $951,244 and $150,173 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 respectively.



The deferred tax asset for December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows:



|                                                                  |               |              
|----------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------
|                                                                  |               |              
|                                                                  | 2010          | 2009         
|Deferred Tax Asset arising from Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards | $ 133,658     | $ 52,560     
|Valuation allowance                                               | (133,658)     | (52,560)     
|                                                                  |               |              
|Net deferred tax asset                                            | $           - | $           -



Based on the available objective evidence, including the Companys history of its loss, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.



A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:



|                                                    |       |      
|--------------------------------------------------- | ----- | -----
|                                                    |       |      
|                                                    | 2010  | 2009 
|Federal and state statutory rate                    | 35%   | 35%  
|Chang in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | (35%) | (35%)



In accordance with FASB ASC 740, the Company has evaluated its tax positions and determined there are no uncertain tax positions.



10.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS



There were no subsequent events through April 14, 2010 that would warrant further disclosures.









27



---





Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure



None



Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures.



Disclosure Controls and Procedures



We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.





We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2010. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, and in light of the material weaknesses found in our internal controls over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.



Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 using the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").



A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|1)
We do not have an Audit Committee While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee, it is the managements view that such a committee, including a financial expert member, is an utmost important entity level control over the Companys financial statement. Currently the Board of Directors acts in the capacity of the Audit Committee, and does not include a member that is considered to be independent of management to provide the necessary oversight over managements activities.
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|2)
We did not maintain appropriate cash controls As of December 31, 2010, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling and accounting functions, and did not require dual signature on the Companys bank accounts.  Alternatively, the effects of poor cash controls were mitigated by the fact that the Company had limited transactions in their bank accounts.                                 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|3)
We did not implement appropriate information technology controls As at December 31, 2010, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Companys data or off-site storage of the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.                                                                                                                                       







28



---







Management is evaluating plans on a cost benefit basis to remedy the above weaknesses and we continue the process to complete a thorough review of our internal controls as part of our preparation for compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 requires our management to report on, and our external auditors to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. As a non-accelerated filer under Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, our first report under Section 404 as a smaller reporting company will be contained in our

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.



This annual report does not include an attestation report of the companys independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by the companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only managements report.



Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting



There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation
we conducted of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Companys registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Managements report was not subject to attestation by the Companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only managements report in this annual report.





Item 9B.   Other Information

None.





PART II

OTHER INFORMATION



Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons



Directors and Executive Officers



Set forth below are the names, ages and present principal occupations or employment, and material occupations, positions, offices or employments for the past five years of our current directors and executive officers.



|                  |     |                                                                                                         
|----------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |     |                                                                                                         
|Name              | Age | Positions and Offices Held                                                                              
|                  |     |                                                                                                         
|Domenic Macchione | 53  | Director/Secretary                                                                                      
|Jeff Mak          | 54  | President/CEO/CFO/Secretary/Director/Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer





29



---





BUSINESS EXPERIENCE



Set forth below is the name of our director and officer, all positions and offices held with us , the period during which he has served as such, and the business experience during at least the last five years:



JEFF MAK was appointed as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial officer and a member of the Board of Directors as of July 23, 2008. Mr. Mak brings several years of experience in the design and technology industry. He was a founder and director of Logicsys Technologies, Inc a once publicly traded company on the TSX. He was also, president and founder of Eastgate Innovations, Inc. a product design and research and development company which owns several original patents and has licensed to several other companies. Mr. Mak was previously co-founder and director of Peceptek Inc. for 6 years since January 2002 to February 2008.



KWOK KWON CHAN was appointed as a member of the Board of Directors on August 25, 2008. Mr. Chan has over 35 years of experience with electronics industry at varies positions, including product design and top level manufacturing management up to 400 employees. Mr. Chan was officially trained by National Taiwan University with Bachelor degree of electrical engineering which is certified as North America equivalent. Mr. Chan also was trained and successfully completed Diploma in Business Management which is certified as North America equivalent also. Mr. Chans experiences not only supported him on product design but also on full scale business management too.



For the past 7 years, Mr. Chan has worked for NOVX Systems Inc., a high technologies company with new invention of optical signal switching. Mr. Chan worked as a Senior technologies and was responsible for electronics lab management for 3 years. Previously, Mr. Chan worked for Nytric Ltd.  as a Senior Design Engineer. Mr. Chan was responsible of new product design and development, feasibility study of new inventions.



Neither our sole executive officer nor any of our directors is a director in any other U.S. reporting companies. Our director/officer has not been affiliated with any company that has filed for bankruptcy within the last five years. The Company is not aware of any proceedings to which the Companys officer/directors, or any associate of any such officer/directors, is a party adverse to the Company or any of the Companys subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to it.



Each director of the Company serves for a term of one year or until the successor is elected at the Company's annual shareholders' meeting and is qualified, subject to removal by the Company's shareholders. Each officer serves, at the pleasure of the board of directors, for a term of one year and until the successor is elected at the annual meeting of the board of directors and is qualified.



Audit Committee and Expert



We do not have an audit committee or an audit committee financial expert. Our corporate financial affairs are simple at this stage of development and each financial transaction can be viewed by any officer or director at will. The policy of having no committee will change if the constitution of one such becomes necessary as a result of growth of the company or as mandated by public policy.



Auditors; Code of Ethics; Financial Expert



We do not currently have a Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers. We do not have a financial expert on the board or an audit committee or nominating committee.



Potential Conflicts of Interest

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our directors.  Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation and audit issues that may affect management decisions.  We are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executives or directors.





30



---





Director Independence



We are not subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or national securities association and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our board comprised of a majority of independent directors. We do not believe that any of our directors currently meet the definition of independent as promulgated by the rules and regulations of the American Stock Exchange.



Item 11. Executive Compensation



Summary Compensation



Since our incorporation on July 21, 2008, we have not paid any compensation to our directors or officers in consideration for their services rendered to our Company in their capacity as such, other than the issuance of 500,000 shares of the Companys common stock to Kwok Kwong Chan on August 6, 2008.  We have no employment agreements with any of our directors or executive officers.  We have no pension, health, annuity, bonus, insurance, stock options, profit sharing or similar benefit plans.



Since our incorporation on July 21, 2008, no stock options or stock appreciation rights were granted to any of our directors or executive officers.  We have no equity incentive plans.



Outstanding Equity Awards

Our directors and officers do not have unexercised options, stock that has not vested, or equity incentive plan awards.

Compensation of Directors

Since our incorporation on July 21, 2003, we have issued 500,000 shares of common stock to Kwok Kwong Chanin consideration for his services rendered in his capacity as director, valued in the amount of $5,000.



Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management



The following table lists, as of April 14, 2011, the number of shares of common stock of our Company that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using beneficial ownership concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.



The percentages below are calculated based on 60,973,219 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of April 14, 2011.  We do not have any outstanding options, warrants or other securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of our common stock.  Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is c/o Zentric, Inc., Unit C2, 802 Southdown Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5J Canada.





|                                             |                |                                           |                 
|-------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ----------------
|Name of Beneficial Owner                     | Title Of Class | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class
|                                             |                |                                           |                 
|Mr. Jeff Mak                                 | Common         | 25,000,000                                | 41.1%           
|Domenic Macchione                            | Common         | 1,000,000                                 | 1.6%            
|                                             |                |                                           |                 
|Directors and Officers as a Group (2 person) | Common         | 26,000,000                                | 42.7%           









31



---



Changes in Control



There are no arrangements which may result in a change in control of the Company.



Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions



Other than the transactions discussed below, we have not entered into any transaction nor are there any proposed transactions in which our Director, executive officer, stockholder or any member of the immediate family of the foregoing had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.



Since Mr. Jeff Mak became our sole officer and a director, he has advanced funds for professional fees and general expenses in the amount of $23,453 and $25,565 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.



Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services.



Audit Fees



The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the Companys principal accountant for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $7,500 and $6,500 respectively.



Audit-Related Fees

The Company incurred no fees during the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the Companys principal accountant that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the registrants financial statements and are not reported under Item 9(e)(1) of Schedule A.



Tax Fees

The Company incurred no fees during the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the Companys principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.



All Other Fees

The Company incurred fees during the last two fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $7,500 and $0 for services rendered by the Companys principal accountants relating to the review of quarterly financial statements for inclusion in the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10Q.



PART IV



Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules





a)

Exhibits



(3.1)

(i)  Articles of Incorporation

(3.2)

(ii)  Bylaws.                
(1)

(31.1)

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

(i)  Certification of Jeff Mak

(32.1)

Certification  Pursuant To The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As
Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

(i)  Certification of Jeff Mak



(1) Incorporated by reference to previous filing

(2)These items have been previously filed



b)

Reports on Form 8-K

Form 8-K Filed on December 14, 2009 reporting a license agreement.

Form 8-K Filed on January 15, 2010 reporting a name change.







32



---



SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this annual report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





ZENTRIC, INC.



Date: April 14, 2011





By:  
/s/ Jeff Mak

Name: 
Jeff Mak

Title:      President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Financial and Accounting Officer)































33



---