alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1992
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1992
<CASH>                                             127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   127
<PP&E>                                           6,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,225
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        49,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (147,737)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,437
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               303,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (303,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (303,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (303,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-15-0276 SAT Date: 2/20/2015 Print Date: 7/7/2015

Related cases : Yes Health related cases: Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG; ONCO; IMMUNOTOX; MUTA (UNCERT)
Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-15-0276 FATE:
S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 °C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 °C (E) BP > 400 °C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong PBT Potential: P3B1SAT Chair: Fate assessor: Ecotox assessor: Health assessor:
Terry JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James McAnthony BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3588

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,411]


Marmon Keystone Corporation; Butler, PA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 26, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by United Steelworkers Union, Local 8042 on 
behalf of workers of Marmon Keystone Corporation, Butler, Pennsylvania.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7147 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Alternative Energy Partners, Inc.  (the Company)
hereby certifies that the Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period
ended July 31, 2009, accompanying this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      November 12, 2009
            
            /s/
      Jack L. StapletonJack
      L. StapletonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Title 18, United
States Code, and is not being filed as part of the report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Laq Lamar SWANIGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2793

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Charles SEMKO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-769

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 10, 2017 Rehearing Denied November 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Dave GAPHOOR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2505

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         646,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  670,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,317,333
<PP&E>                                      17,077,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,395,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,143,936
<BONDS>                                      2,468,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,352,915
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,570,066)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,395,294
<SALES>                                        973,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               973,149
<CGS>                                          741,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  741,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               882,243
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             168,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,267,712)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,267,712)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)


</TABLE>
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Bulk Storage Software, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedure to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and
  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 s/ Geoffrey Gibbs,
William JACKSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1858

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-51091

Summary Calendar

_____________________

LAWRENCE T. DALY, Individually and as

Next Friend of Lawrence T. Daly, Jr.;

LISA DALY, Individually and as Next Friend

of Lawrence T. Daly, Jr.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,

Defendants,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-97-CV-184)

_________________________________________________________________

November 12, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this medical malpractice action under the Federal Tort

Claims Act, Appellants contest the summary judgment granted the

United States and the denial of their motion for reconsideration.

The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge.
- 2 -

Appellants state that Lawrence T. Daly died in December 1997,

but they have not moved to substitute his representative. Because

we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate, there is no need

to delay a decision for the formality of substitution of the

deceased’s representative. See FED. R. APP. P. 43(a).

Appellants contend that the United States was negligent in

failing to diagnose Lawrence T. Daly’s cancer before it

metastasized and became inoperable. Based upon our required de

novo review of the record, we AFFIRM essentially for the reasons

stated by the magistrate judge. See Daly v. United States, No. SA97-CV-184 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 1997 & Dec. 9, 1997). In sum,

Appellants offered no expert evidence raising a genuine issue of

material fact with respect to causation of Mr. Daly’s injuries.

See Rodriguez v. Pacificare of Texas, Inc., 980 F.2d 1014, 1020

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 956 (1993); Tilotta v. Goodall,

752 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App. 1988, writ denied).

It is quite arguable that Appellants have failed to properly

brief the issue concerning the motion to reconsider. See FED. R.

APP. P. 28(a)(6). In any event, although the magistrate judge

applied an overly stringent standard in considering Appellants’

motion for reconsideration (filed within 10 days of entry of

judgment; therefore, FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) applied), see Lavespere

v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, Inc., 910 F.2d 167, 174 (5th Cir.

1990) (applying abuse of discretion standard of review to motion

for reconsideration under Rule 59(e)), the ruling—even if the
- 3 -

motion had been granted, the potential additional evidence would

not have affected the judgment—was not an abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sealy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 26, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David J. McIlquham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James B. Hirshorn, Senior Executive Vice President,
Finance, Operations, Research and Development of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



May 17,
2006

| | /s/DAVID J. MCILQUHAMDavid J. McIlquham
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                                      
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/JAMES B. HIRSHORNJames B. Hirshorn
Senior Executive Vice President, Finance, Operations, Research & Development
(Principal Financial Officer)

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
USC. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Willing Holding, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the twelve months ended  December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Thomas L. DiStefano III, Co-Chairman and CEO of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe
Company.


April
      15, 2010
              
              /S/
      THOMAS L. DISTEFANO IIIThomas
      L. DiStefano III
                Co-Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32





Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the “Act”) and Rule 15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), each of the undersigned, Dale Long, President and Principal Executive Officer of EVCARCO, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Nikolay Frolov, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 17, 2010




By:
/s/ Dale LongDale LongPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)By:
/s/ Nikolay FrolovNikolay FrolovChief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit
      31.1**




**Certification**




Pursuant
      to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
      Bohn
      H. Crain, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Radiant Logistics,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant
      and
      have:





(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
      and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant's board of directors:





(a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.





DATE:
      February 14, 2007


BY: /s/
      Bohn H. Crain


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 30, 2023

NO. 03-23-00461-CV

W. B., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on July 14, 2023. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.