Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Notices 14109 

of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508), and 

Air Force policy and procedures (32 

CFR Part 989), the National Guard 

Bureau is issuing this notice to advise 

the public of its intent to prepare an EIS 

to evaluate the potential environmental 

impacts that could result from the 

proposed realignment of a portion of 

National Guard Avenue, and 

construction of a new main gate at the 

158th Fighter Wing (158 FW) 

installation at Burlington International 

Airport. 

A recent evaluation of infrastructure 

security at the installation identified 

several vulnerabilities revealing a 

potential threat to mission-critical 

resources. Realignment of a segment of 

National Guard Avenue would remedy 

some of these vulnerabilities, and 

protect mission-critical resources. Work 

conducted would be in compliance with 

anti-terrorism/force protection (AT/FP) 

standoff criteria. Preliminary studies 

indicate that potential significant 

adverse effects to wetlands and to 

sensitive Native American sites may 

result from realignment of the roadway. 

In addition to the road segment 

realignment, the 158 FW would also 

construct a new main gate along a 

portion of the realigned roadway, 

construct a new Security Forces facility, 

which would be collocated with the 

new main gate, and construct an 

internal roadway loop that would 

improve vehicular safety and circulation 

to a portion of the installation. 

In addition to the proposed action, 

another action alternative will evaluate 

the potential impacts of an alternative 

roadway alignment for National Guard 

Avenue, and redesigning the main gate 

in its current location to meet AT/FP 

criteria. The Security Forces and 

internal roadway loop would remain as 

described under the Proposed Action. 

The no-action alternative will also be 

analyzed in the EIS. 

The National Guard Bureau will 

conduct a scoping meeting to solicit 

public input concerning the proposal. 

The scoping process will help identify 

issues to be addressed in the 

environmental analysis. Comments will 

be accepted at any time during the 

environmental impact analysis process. 

However, to ensure the Air Force has 

sufficient time to consider public input 

in the preparation of the Draft EIS, 

comments should be submitted to the 

address below by 16 April 2009. 

Notices will be posted and published 

in the Burlington Free Press. The 

scoping meetings will be held at the 

South Burlington High School, Cafeteria 

#2, 550 Dorset Street, South Burlington, 

VT 05403, on 16 April 2009, from 6–9 

p.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Please direct any written comments or 

requests for information to Robert 

Dogan, NGB/A7AM, at Conaway Hall, 

3500 Fetchet Avenue, Andrews Air 

Force Base, Maryland 20762–5157; (301) 

836–8859; or fax (301) 836–7428. 

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–7054 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Navy 

Notice of Availability of Department of 

the Navy Report to the Council on 

Environmental Quality on the Use of 

Alternative Arrangements 

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy 

(Navy) announces the availability of its 

report to the Council on Environmental 

Quality (CEQ) on the value and 

effectiveness of the Alternative 

Arrangements for the U.S. Navy’s 

Composite Training Unit Exercises 

(COMPTUEXs) and Joint Task Force 

Exercises (JTFEXs) that occurred 

between January 15, 2008 and January 

23, 2009, in the Southern California 

(SOCAL) Operating Area. The full text 

of the Navy’s report to the CEQ is 

available for public viewing on the Web 

site established for the SOCAL Range 

Complex Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) at http:// 

www.socalrangecomplexeis.com. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 15, 2008, the Navy accepted 

alternative arrangements approved by 

the CEQ, for implementing the 

procedural provisions of the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 

U.S.C. 4321 et seq. for five COMPTUEXs 

and four JTFEXs that occurred between 

January 15, 2008 and January 23, 2009 

in the SOCAL Operating Area. These 

alternative arrangements specifically 

addressed the use of mid-frequency 

active (MFA) sonar and its effects on 

marine mammals during Navy exercises 

in the SOCAL Operating Area. 

The Secretary of the Navy’s decision 

memorandum documenting the Navy’s 

acceptance of these alternative 

arrangements was published in the 

Federal Register on January 24, 2008. 

The decision memorandum provided 

that, after the conclusion of the 

alternative arrangements, and no later 

than March 23, 2009, the Navy would 

provide a report to the CEQ that 

reviewed the value and effectiveness of 

the approved alternative arrangements. 

This notice announces the public 

availability of the Navy’s report to the 

CEQ. The full text of the report is 

available for public viewing on the Web 

site established for the SOCAL Range 

Complex EIS at http:// 

www.socalrangecomplexeis.com. 

Dated: March 25, 2009. 

A. M. Vallandingham, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate 

General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 

Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–7049 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Intent To Repay to the Northwest 

Indian College Funds Recovered as a 

Result of a Final Audit Determination 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to award 

grantback funds. 

Education (Secretary) intends to repay 

to the Northwest Indian College (NWIC) 

an amount that represents 

approximately 57 percent of the amount 

of funds recovered by the Department of 

Education (Department) as a result of 

final audit determinations for audit 

findings covering fiscal years 1999– 

2001. The Department’s recovery of 

funds followed resolution of the audit 

disallowances identified in a September 

30, 2004 Program Determination Letter 

(PDL) issued by the Office of Vocational 

and Adult Education (OVAE) for the 

period of July 1, 1999 through 

November 26, 2001. The PDL sought 

recovery of $316,096. On December 1, 

2004, NWIC appealed the monetary 

findings in the September 30, 2004 PDL 

to the Department’s Office of the 

Administrative Law Judges (OALJ). 

Following discussions and exchanges of 

information between the parties, on 

March 27, 2006, the parties entered into 

a Repayment Agreement (Agreement) 

that fully resolved the issues in the 

proceeding and under which NWIC 

agreed to repay the Department 

$316,096. The NWIC has repaid the full 

amount in accordance with the 

Agreement. 

This notice describes NWIC’s plan for 

the use of a portion of the repaid funds 

and the terms and conditions under 

which the Secretary intends to make 

grantback funds available to NWIC. 

This notice invites comments on the 

proposed grantback. 

DATES: We must receive your comments 

on or before April 29, 2009. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
14110 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Notices 

ADDRESS: All written comments 

concerning the proposed grantback 

should be addressed to Gwen 

Washington, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., 

room 11076, Potomac Center Plaza 

(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–7241. If 

you prefer to send your comments 

through the internet, use the following 

address: gwen.washington@ed.gov. You 

must include the term ‘‘Northwest 

Indian College Grantback’’ in the subject 

line of your electronic message. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gwen Washington. Telephone: (202) 

245–7790. Fax: (202) 245–7170 or by email: gwen.washington@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD), call the 

Federal Relay Service (FRS) toll free, at 

1–800–877–8339. 

Individuals with disabilities can 

obtain a copy of this notice in an 

accessible format (e.g., Braille, large 

print, audiotape, or computer diskette) 

by contacting the person listed in this 

section. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Invitation 

to Comment: We invite you to submit 

comments regarding this notice. To 

ensure that your comments have 

maximum effect on the Secretary’s 

decision regarding awarding this 

grantback, we urge you to identify 

clearly the specific proposal that each 

comment addresses. 

During and after the comment period, 

you may inspect all public comments 

about this notice in room 11076, 550 

12th Street, SW., Washington, DC, 

between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 

p.m., Washington, DC time, Monday 

through Friday of each week except 

Federal holidays. 

Assistance to Individuals with 

Disabilities in Reviewing the 

Rulemaking Record: On request, we will 

provide an appropriate accommodation 

or auxiliary aid to an individual with a 

disability who needs assistance to 

review the comments or other 

documents in the public rulemaking 

record for this notice. If you want to 

schedule an appointment for this type of 

accommodation or auxiliary aid, please 

contact the person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

A. Background 

Under the terms of a March 27, 2006 

Repayment Agreement between the 

Department and NWIC, the Department 

recovered a total of $316,096 from 

NWIC following resolution of audit 

findings contained in an audit report 

issued by the Department’s Office of 

Inspector General (OIG) covering audit 

periods July 1, 1999 through June 30, 

2001 and October 1, 1999 through 

November 26, 2001 (Audit Control 

Number ED–OIG/A09–C0026). Prior to 

entering into the Agreement, the 

Department and NWIC engaged in the 

cooperative audit resolution of the 

findings contained in the audit report in 

an effort to address the root causes of 

the problems and to avoid recurrence of 

these findings in the future. The OIG 

audit report and this grantback request 

involve two Department grants awarded 

under the Indian Vocational Education 

Program (IVEP) (CFDA 84.101A): a 

Document Imaging Specialist Certificate 

(DISC) grant and a Promising Practices 

grant. 

The IVEP was authorized under 

section 103 of the Carl D. Perkins 

Vocational and Applied Technology 

Education Act of 1990 (Perkins II). The 

IVEP was succeeded by the Native 

American Vocational and Technical 

Education Program (NAVTEP), 

authorized under section 116 of the Carl 

D. Perkins Vocational and Technical 

Education Act of 1998 (Perkins III). The 

NAVTEP was replaced by the Native 

American Career and Technical 

Education Program (NACTEP), 

authorized under section 116 of the Carl 

D. Perkins Career and Technical 

Education Act of 2006 (Perkins IV). 

1. IVEP—DISC Grant 

Under the terms of the DISC grant, 

NWIC was to provide vocational 

education and training in electronic 

document management and document 

conversion services to unemployed and 

low-income members of its tribal service 

population. One finding resulting in 

NWIC’s repayment of funds related to 

NWIC’s improper awards of stipends to 

certain DISC students who were either 

ineligible to receive stipends or received 

more than they were eligible to receive. 

Moreover, section 103(b)(1)(D) of 

Perkins II and the regulations in effect 

when the DISC Project grant award was 

made to NWIC (34 CFR 401 (1999)) 

established the conditions under which 

an IVEP grantee was authorized to 

provide stipends to students. The 

Department determined that NWIC had 

used its IVEP grant to pay stipends in 

a manner inconsistent with Perkins II 

and its implementing regulations. The 

stipend finding resulted in the 

Department’s claim for recovery of 

$150,670. 

2. IVEP—Promising Practices Grant 

Under the Promising Practices grant, 

NWIC was required to survey, assemble, 

and distribute best practices in the use 

of technology on projects funded by the 

IVEP. Required deliverables included: 

• A survey instrument developed in 

consultation with OVAE personnel; 

• Identification of eight promising 

practices sites; 

• Manuals summarizing practices for 

all IVEP projects; 

• A list of contacts at each IVEP 

project who were responsible for 

technology; and 

• A presentation at an annual project 

directors’ meeting for IVEP grantees. 

NWIC failed to complete most of the 

activities it had committed to 

completing under the grant and failed to 

provide required products and 

deliverables. The products and 

deliverables and the draft documents 

that NWIC provided to the Department 

contained no comprehensive discussion 

of survey findings, and the case studies 

on the selected sites were not prepared. 

In addition, the quality of products and 

deliverables that NWIC did prepare 

under the Promising Practices project 

had been severely compromised because 

NWIC had not used a panel of experts 

to select the sites of Promising Practices 

and because NWIC had not identified 

the criteria or standards it had used to 

select Promising Practices sites. 

Moreover, although required to do so 

under the terms of the Promising 

Practices grant, NWIC did not produce 

any Promising Practices manuals. 

Because NWIC did not deliver the 

agreed-upon products and manuals 

proposed in its approved grant, neither 

the Department nor its NAVTEP 

grantees benefited from the information 

on best practices in the use of 

technology, and the Department was 

denied a resource for providing 

technical assistance to future NAVTEP 

grantees. Based on NWIC’s failure to 

deliver products and deliverables under 

the Promising Practices grant, the 

Department sought repayment of 

$57,800. 

3. DISC and Promising Practices Grants 

Unsupported Costs 

The Department also sought recovery 

of $107,626 due to NWIC’s charging of 

unreasonable and unallowable charges 

to both the DISC and the Promising 

Practices grants and because NWIC 

lacked the required supporting 

documentation for certain transactions 

under both grants. 

Under the terms of the Agreement 

between the Department and NWIC, 

NWIC has repaid to the Department the 

full $316,096 and established the 

necessary managerial and financial 

systems needed to provide oversight of 

institutional and grant resources. NWIC 

is requesting approval of a grantback in 

the amount of $179,855, which is 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Notices 14111 

approximately 57 percent of the amount 

it repaid to the Department. 

B. Authority for Awarding a Grantback 

Section 459(a) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 

1234h(a), provides that, whenever the 

Secretary has recovered funds under an 

applicable program because the 

recipient made an expenditure of funds 

that was not allowable, the Secretary 

may consider those funds to be 

additional funds available for the 

program and may arrange to repay to the 

grantee affected by that determination 

an amount not to exceed 75 percent of 

the recovered funds. The Secretary may 

enter into this grantback requested by 

NWIC if the Secretary determines that— 

(a) The NWIC practices and 

procedures that resulted in the audit 

findings in question have been 

corrected, and NWIC is in compliance 

with the requirements of the applicable 

programs; 

(b) NWIC has submitted to the 

Secretary a plan for the use of the funds 

to be awarded under the grantback 

arrangement that meets the 

requirements of the program and, to the 

extent possible, benefits the population 

that was affected by the failure to 

comply or by misexpenditures that 

resulted in the recovery; and 

(c) The use of funds to be awarded 

under the grantback arrangement in 

accordance with NWIC’s plan would 

serve to achieve the purposes of the 

program under which the funds were 

originally granted. 

C. NWIC’s Plan for Use of Funds 

Awarded Under a Grantback 

Arrangement 

Pursuant to section 459(a)(2) of GEPA, 

NWIC has applied for a grantback 

totaling $179,855, which is 

approximately 57 percent of the 

principal amount of the recovered funds 

and has submitted a plan outlining the 

activities that NWIC would support 

with the grantback funds. Specifically, 

NWIC plans to utilize the grantback of 

funds recovered under the IVEP to pay 

costs associated with a proposed Digital 

Media and Web Technology program. 

As proposed, students would take the 

entire Digital Media and Web 

Technology program in a 20-week block, 

consisting of 10 weeks of intensive 

classroom instruction at the main NWIC 

Lummi campus followed immediately 

by 10 weeks of an internship and an 

integrated capstone project. The 

intensive classes would consist of 24 

contact hours a week (six hours per day, 

Monday through Thursday). The 

program would provide participants 

who successfully complete the course 

training, an internship, and a capstone 

course with a certificate of completion. 

Program completers would receive the 

skills and knowledge necessary to: (1) 

Pass Adobe’s Certified Associate exams 

in: Web Communication—using Adobe 

‘‘Dreamweaver,’’ Rich Media 

Communication—using Adobe ‘‘Flash,’’ 

and Visual Communication—using 

Adobe ‘‘Photoshop;’’ (2) obtain Adobe 

Certified Associate certifications in one 

or more of those Adobe applications; 

and (3) subsequently obtain high-quality 

employment in the field of digital 

media. It is important to note that the 

proposed new certification program 

does not supplant non-Federal funds 

already available to NWIC. 

The proposed project would focus 

strongly on career and technical 

education (CTE) skill development in 

digital media and web technology and 

provide course content that is 

experiential and individually directed, 

and concludes with an internship and a 

capstone project. The capstone project 

has been specifically designed to 

integrate and assess the skills developed 

in the courses taught during the first 10 

weeks of the Digital Media and Web 

Technology program. Students would be 

expected to demonstrate mastery of the 

Adobe Certified Associate skills through 

a capstone project presentation that 

reflects both their classroom and 

internship work. Together, the 

classroom work, internship, and 

capstone segments constitute a single 

coherent and integrated curriculum— 

the goal of which is to prepare students 

to master the Adobe Certified Associate 

skills, receive an Award of Completion, 

pass the Certified Adobe Associate 

exam, and gain successful employment. 

Funding for the program would 

support: (1) limited pre-award costs for 

recruiting students who are 

academically prepared to benefit from 

the intensive Digital Media and Web 

Technology program, and (2) 

implementation costs, including salaries 

for the project director and classroom 

instructors, costs of supervising and 

advising students, and employment 

placement costs, through September 30, 

2009. In its grantback request, NWIC has 

stated that a total of 32 students, equally 

divided between two cycles, would 

participate in the program with an 

expected job placement rate of 85 

percent within six months of program 

completion. The proposed Digital Media 

and Web Technology program is a CTE 

program using Adobe software and 

incorporating all of the learning 

objectives identified by Adobe for the 

Adobe Certified Associate programs: 

Web Communication Using Adobe 

‘‘Dreamweaver,’’ Rich Media 

Communication Using Adobe ‘‘Flash,’’ 

and Visual Communication using Adobe 

‘‘Photoshop.’’ The Digital Media and 

Web Technology program will prepare 

students to enter their chosen 

disciplines upon completion of the 

program. As part of the program, NWIC 

plans to provide opportunities for 

students to practice taking the Adobe 

Certified Associate exams and expects 

to administer the exams after the 

completion of each of the two training 

cycles. NWIC proposes that exam 

preparation and testing would be fully 

integrated into the Digital Media and 

Web Technology program. In addition, 

NWIC will identify and recruit potential 

students in an effort to be fully prepared 

to start training the first cohort of 

students by late April or early May 

2009, if a grantback is awarded. 

NWIC has designed this program to be 

sustainable after completion of the two 

cycles, allowing NWIC to continue to 

deliver a Digital Media and Web 

Technology program on an ongoing 

basis once Federal grantback funds are 

no longer available. NWIC notes in its 

grantback request that the proposed 

Digital Media and Web Technology 

program broadens its technical offerings 

into areas that are in demand both 

within tribal communities and 

throughout the Pacific Northwest. NWIC 

is hopeful that the Digital Media and 

Web Technology program will provide 

attractive long-term employment 

opportunities, because it will emphasize 

marketing, recruiting, internship, and 

placement activities to a greater extent 

than does NWIC’s current computer 

technology programming. It is NWIC’s 

intention that these activities and their 

benefits would continue beyond the 

proposed project time frame and would 

increase the reach and sustainability of 

NWIC’s computer and technology 

educational programming. Additionally, 

preparing NWIC students to pass the 

Adobe Certified Associate exams would 

prepare those students for nationally 

recognized certifications thereby further 

broadening their employment options. 

D. The Secretary’s Determinations 

The Secretary has carefully reviewed 

the plan submitted by NWIC. Based 

upon that review, the Secretary has 

determined that the conditions under 

section 459(a) of GEPA have been met. 

This determination is based upon the 

best information available to the 

Secretary at the present time. If this 

information is not accurate or complete, 

the Secretary is not precluded from 

taking appropriate administrative 

action. In finding that the conditions of 

section 459(a) of GEPA have been met, 

the Secretary makes no determination 

concerning any pending audit 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
14112 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Notices 

recommendations or final audit 

determinations. 

The Secretary also has concluded 

that, to the extent possible, this 

grantback award would support the 

provision of services to the population 

of intended beneficiaries of the program 

under which the DISC and Promising 

Practices grants were originally made. 

The population of intended 

beneficiaries under IVEP and NAVTEP 

may not have received the full benefit 

of the services intended by the Perkins 

IVEP grant awards, currently NACTEP, 

due to the problems that gave rise to the 

audit recovery described in Section A of 

this notice. The Secretary has 

determined that if awarded, this 

grantback would advance and support 

the same policy goals and purposes of 

the statutory Perkins II provisions that 

authorized the initial DISC and 

Promising Practices grants and would be 

used in compliance with all current 

statutory and regulatory program 

requirements. 

E. Notice of the Secretary’s Intent to 

Enter into a Grantback Arrangement 

with NWIC 

Section 459(d) of GEPA requires that, 

at least 30 days before entering into an 

arrangement to award funds under a 

grantback, the Secretary publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of intent to do 

so, and the terms and conditions under 

which the payment would be made. In 

accordance with section 459(d) of 

GEPA, notice is hereby given that the 

Secretary intends to make funds 

available to NWIC under a grantback 

arrangement. The grantback award 

would be in the amount of $179,855, 

which is approximately 57 percent of 

the principal amount recovered as a 

result of the Agreement. 

F. Terms and Conditions Under Which 

Payments Under a Grantback 

Arrangement with NWIC Would Be 

Made 

NWIC agrees to comply with the 

following terms and conditions under 

which payments under a grantback 

arrangement would be made: 

(a) The funds awarded under the 

grantback must be spent in accordance 

with— 

(1) All applicable statutory and 

regulatory requirements; 

(2) The plan that NWIC submitted and 

any amendments to the plan that are 

approved in advance by the Secretary; 

and 

(3) The budget that NWIC submitted 

with the approved plan and any 

amendments to the budget that are 

approved in advance by the Secretary. 

(b) All funds received under the 

grantback arrangement must be 

obligated by NWIC by September 30, 

2009, in accordance with section 459(c) 

of GEPA and NWIC’s approved plan. 

(c) NWIC must, no later than 

December 31, 2009, submit a report to 

the Secretary that— 

(1) Indicates that the funds awarded 

under the grantback have been spent in 

accordance with the proposed plan and 

any amendments that have been 

approved in advance by the Secretary; 

and 

(2) Describes the results and 

effectiveness of the project for which the 

funds were spent, including the number 

of students who enrolled in the training 

sessions, the number of students who 

received an Award of Completion, the 

number of students who took the Adobe 

exams, and the number of students who 

passed the exams and obtained Adobe 

certifications. 

(d) NWIC must maintain separate 

accounting records documenting the 

expenditures of funds awarded under 

the grantback arrangement. 

Electronic Access to This Document 

You can view this document, as well 

as all other documents of this 

Department published in the Federal 

Register, in text or Adobe Portable 

Document Format (PDF) on the Internet 

at the following site: www.ed.gov/news/ 

fedregister. 

To use PDF you must have Adobe 

Acrobat Reader, which is available free 

at this site. If you have questions about 

using PDF, call the U.S. Government 

Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– 

888–293–6498; or in the Washington, 

DC, area at (202) 512–1530. 

Note: The official version of this document 

is the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the Code 

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO 

Access at: www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ 

index.html. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Numbers: 84.101A, Native American Career 

and Technical Education Program.) 

Dated: March 25, 2009. 

Dennis Berry, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Vocational and 

Adult Education. 

[FR Doc. E9–7036 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings 

March 23, 2009. 

Take notice that the Commission has 

received the following Natural Gas 

Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings: 

Docket Numbers: RP96–320–103. 

Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline 

Company, LP. 

Description: Gulf South Pipeline 

Company, LP submits Negotiated Rate 

Capacity Release Agreement. 

Filed Date: 03/18/2009. 

Accession Number: 20090319–0219. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Monday, March 30, 2009. 

Docket Numbers: RP96–389–091. 

Applicants: Columbia Gulf 

Transmission Company. 

Description: Columbia Gulf 

Transmission Company submits FTS–1 

Service Agreement No 68436-Revision 

No 4 between Columbia Gulf 

Transmission Company and JP Morgan 

Ventures Energy Corporation. 

Filed Date: 03/18/2009. 

Accession Number: 20090319–0218. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Monday, March 30, 2009. 

Docket Numbers: RP02–534–014. 

Applicants: Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C. 

Description: Guardian Pipeline, LLC 

submits Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 6 et 

al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 

No. 1, to effective 4/1/09. 

Filed Date: 03/02/2009. 

Accession Number: 20090304–0130. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Friday, March 27, 2009. 

Docket Numbers: RP09–385–002. 

Applicants: Caledonia Energy 

Partners, L.L.C. 

Description: Caledonia Energy 

Partners, LLC submits First Revised 

Sheet No 43 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, 

Original Volume No 1. 

Filed Date: 03/19/2009. 

Accession Number: 20090320–0095. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 31, 2009. 

Docket Numbers: RP09–233–001. 

Applicants: Northern Natural Gas 

Company. 

Description: Northern Natural Gas 

Company submits Substitute Sixth 

Revised Sheet 285 to FERC Gas Tariff, 

Fifth Revised Volume 1, to be effective 

2/21/09. 

Filed Date: 03/20/2009. 

Accession Number: 20090323–0033. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Wednesday, April 01, 2009. 

Docket Numbers: RP09–394–001. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES