## 21240 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 77 / Monday, April 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

Initial and Repetitive Inspections

(h) Except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD: At the applicable time specified in Table 2 of this AD, do the applicable initial inspections to detect cracks of all SSIs, in accordance with Revision E. Repeat the applicable inspections thereafter at the intervals specified in Section 3.0,

‘‘ Implementation ’’ of Revision E. 

### T ABLE 

### 2.

— C OMPLIANCE 

### T IME FOR 

### I NITIAL 

### I NSPECTIONS For airplanes with SSIs

—Compliance time(1) Affected by the cargo configuration. Before the accumulation of 46,000 total flight cycles, or within 4,000 flight cycles measured from 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.(2) Not affected by the cargo configuration. Before the accumulation of 66,000 total flight cycles, or within 4,000 flight cycles measured from 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.

(i) For any SSI that has been repaired or altered before the effective date of this AD such that the repair or design change affects your ability to accomplish the actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD: You must request FAA approval of an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with section 39.17 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.17), at the initial compliance time specified in paragraph (h) of the AD; or do the actions specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD, at the times specified in those paragraphs, as an approved means of compliance with the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.

(1) At the initial compliance time specified in paragraph (h) of the AD, identify each repair or design change to that SSI.

(2) Within 12 months after the identification of a repair or design change required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, assess the damage tolerance characteristics of each SSI affected by each repair or design change to determine the effectiveness of the applicable SSID inspection for that SSI and if not effective, incorporate a revision into the FAA-approved maintenance inspection program to include a damage-tolerance based alternative inspection program for each affected SSI. Thereafter, inspect the affected structure in accordance with the alternative inspection program. The inspection method and compliance times ( i.e. , threshold and repeat intervals) of the alternative inspection program must be approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Repair

(j) If any cracked structure is found during any inspection required by paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD, before further flight, repair the cracked structure using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Inspection Program for Transferred Airplanes

(k) Before any airplane that is subject to this AD and that has exceeded the applicable compliance times specified in paragraph (h) of this AD can be added to an air carrier ’ s operations specifications, a program for the accomplishment of the inspections required by this AD must be established in accordance with paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD, as applicable.

(1) For airplanes that have been inspected in accordance with this AD: The inspection of each SSI must be done by the new operator in accordance with the previous operator ’ s schedule and inspection method, or the new operator ’ s schedule and inspection method, at whichever time would result in the earlier accomplishment for that SSI inspection. The compliance time for accomplishment of this inspection must be measured from the last inspection accomplished by the previous operator. After each inspection has been done once, each subsequent inspection must be performed in accordance with the new operator ’ s schedule and inspection method.

(2) For airplanes that have not been inspected in accordance with this AD: The inspection of each SSI required by this AD must be done either before adding the airplane to the air carrier ’ s operations specification, or in accordance with a schedule and an inspection method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. After each inspection has been done once, each subsequent inspection must be done in accordance with the new operator ’ s schedule. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(l)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair approval must specifically refer to this AD. Material Incorporated by Reference

(m) You must use Boeing Document D6

– 37089, ‘‘ Supplemental Structural Inspection Document for Model 737

– 100/200/200C Airplanes, ’’ Revision E, dated May 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(1) The document contains the following
errors:

(i) Pages 2.0.3 and 2.0.4, Revision D, of Section 2.0 and pages F

– 14.5, Revision D, and F

– 14.6, Revision Blank, of Section 8.2 exist; but are not specified in the List of Effective Pages.

(ii) Pages 7.0.43 through 7.0.46 inclusive of Section 7.0 and pages W.34.1 and W.34.2 of Section 11.1, as specified in the List of Effective Pages, do not exist.

(iii) The List of Effective Pages specifies incorrect revision levels for certain pages; the revision levels specified on each page are correct.

(iv) None of the pages are dated. The issue date for each revision is specified in the Revision Highlights section.

(2) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124

– 2207.

(4) You may review copies of the service information incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202

– 741

– 6030, or go to: http:// www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_locations.html

. Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8, 2008. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8

– 8320 Filed 4

– 18

– 08; 8:45 am]
**BILLING CODE 4910**

**– 13** 

**– P** 



### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
**Federal Aviation Administration**
**14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA** 

**– 2006** 

**– 26726; Directorate**  **Identifier 2006**

**– NM** 

**– 205** 

**– AD; Amendment**  **39**

**– 15479; AD 2008** 

**– 08** 

**– 25]**  **RIN 2120**

**– AA64**  

### Airworthiness Directives; Boeing **Model 747**

**– 400F and** 

**– 400 Series**  **Airplanes**
**AGENCY** 

### : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. **ACTION** 

### : Final rule.


## 21241 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 77 / Monday, April 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

**SUMMARY** 

### : We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 747

– 400F and

– 400 series airplanes. This AD requires installing drains and drain tubes to eliminate water accumulation in the dripshield above the M826 Card File in the main equipment center. This AD results from a report that water from the dripshield entered the card file and damaged a circuit card, causing the AFT CARGO FIRE MSG message to be illuminated and resulting in an air turn back. We are issuing this AD to prevent water from entering the card file and damaging a circuit card. Failure of one or more of the 15 fuel system circuit cards in the card file could cause loss of fuel management, which could cause unavailability of fuel. Failure of one or more of the 35 fire detection circuit cards could cause a false message of a fire, or no message of a fire when there is a fire. **DATES** 

### : This AD is effective May 27, 2008.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 27, 2008. **ADDRESSES** 

### : For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124

– 2207. Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (telephone 800

– 647

– 5527) is the Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M

– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

– 140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

### : Marcia Smith, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM

– 150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057

– 3356; telephone (425) 917

– 6484; fax (425) 917

– 6590. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### : Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to certain Boeing Model 747

– 400F series airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 8, 2007 (72 FR 664). That NPRM proposed to require installing drains and drain tubes to eliminate water accumulation in the dripshield above the M826 Card File in the main equipment center. Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We considered the comment received from the one commenter. Request To Revise the Applicability Language and To Add New Service Information

Boeing requests that all occurrences of the phrase ‘‘ certain 747

– 400F series airplanes ’’ be changed to ‘‘ certain 747

– 400F and certain 747

– 400BCF series airplanes. ’’ Boeing states that this change will clarify the affected models for operators, and that the wording of the proposed applicability statement,

‘‘ 747

– 400F series, ’’ does not include the Model 747

– 400BCF (Boeing converted freighter) airplanes. Boeing states that it is revising the existing service bulletin referred to in the NPRM to include some early Model 747

– 400BCF airplanes.

We partially agree. We have determined that these airplanes are also subject to the identified unsafe condition addressed by this AD. Therefore, we agree to revise the applicability language of this AD to include these airplanes; however, we do not agree to use the language suggested by Boeing. Section XIII., ‘‘ 747

– 400SF Major Design Change, ’’ of the type certificate data sheet for Boeing Model 747 airplanes states that the Model 747

– 400SF (special freighter), optionally known as Model 747

– 400BCF, remains as Model 747

– 400 series airplanes for documentation purposes and with regard to the applicability of ADs. Therefore, we have revised the applicability language in the preamble of this final rule to specify ‘‘ certain Boeing Model 747

– 400F and 747

– 400 series airplanes. ’’ However, none of the airplanes added to the applicability statement of this AD are on the U.S. Register, therefore additional notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are unnecessary. We have also revised the applicability statement of this final rule to refer to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3526, dated November 13, 2007 (described below), for Model 747

– 400 series airplanes.

Since we issued the NPRM, Boeing has issued Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3526 to address the identified unsafe condition on certain Model 747

– 400 series airplanes. This service bulletin includes procedures that are essentially the same as those described in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3370, Revision 1, dated April 27, 2006 (referred to in the NPRM as the appropriate source of service information for doing the proposed actions for Model 747

– 400F airplanes), except that it also includes moving the P402 panel. As we stated previously, we have added Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3526 to this final rule. Conclusion

We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD. Change to Costs of Compliance Section of the NPRM

We have revised this final rule to update the number of airplanes (representing the 747

– 400 series airplanes) in the worldwide fleet. None of the airplanes added to the applicability statement of this AD are on the U.S. Register, so the figures in the estimated costs table remain unchanged. Costs of Compliance

There are about 130 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to comply with this AD. 

### E STIMATED 

### C OSTS

Action Work hours Average labor rate per hour Parts Cost per airplane Number of U.S.-registered airplanes Fleet cost

Installation ................................................ 8 $80 $822 $1,462 21 $30,702


## 21242 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 77 / Monday, April 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA ’ s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘ Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, ’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency ’ s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘ Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. ’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings

This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a ‘‘ significant regulatory action ’’ under Executive Order 12866,

(2) Is not a ‘‘ significant rule ’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and

(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment

■ 

### Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
**PART 39**

**— AIRWORTHINESS**  **DIRECTIVES**

■ 

### 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. **§ 39.13 [Amended]** 
■ 

### 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008

– 08

– 25 Boeing: Amendment 39

– 15479. Docket No. FAA

– 2006

– 26726; Directorate Identifier 2006

–NM

– 205

–AD. Effective Date

(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective May 27, 2008. Affected ADs

(b) None. Applicability

(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747

– 400F airplanes as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3370, Revision 1, dated April 27, 2006; and Model 747

– 400 series airplanes as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3526, dated November 13, 2007; certificated in any category. Unsafe Condition

(d) This AD results from a report that water from the dripshield entered the card file and damaged a circuit card, causing the AFT CARGO FIRE MSG message to be illuminated and resulting in an air turn back. We are issuing this AD to prevent water from entering the card file and damaging a circuit card. Failure of one or more of the 15 fuel system circuit cards in the card file could cause loss of fuel management, which could cause unavailability of fuel. Failure of one or more of the 35 fire detection circuit cards could cause a false message of a fire, or no message of a fire when there is a fire. Compliance

(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Installation

(f) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, install two drains and drain tubes in the dripshield above the M826 Card File over the nose wheel left side in the main equipment center at station 400, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3370, Revision 1, dated April 27, 2006 (for Model 747

– 400F series airplanes); or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3526, dated November 13, 2007 (for Model 747

– 400 series airplanes). Installation According to Previous Issue of Service Bulletin

(g) Installing the drains and drain tubes is also acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD if done before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3370, dated September 8, 2005. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding District Office. Material Incorporated by Reference

(i) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3370, Revision 1, dated April 27, 2006; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747

– 25A3526, dated November 13, 2007; as applicable; to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124

– 2207.

(3) You may review copies of the service information incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202

– 741

– 6030, or go to: http:// www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_locations.html

. Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 7, 2008. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8

– 8327 Filed 4

– 18

– 08; 8:45 am]
**BILLING CODE 4910**

**– 13** 

**– P** 



### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
**Federal Aviation Administration**
**14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA** 

**– 2007** 

**– 0049; Directorate**  **Identifier 2007**

**– NM** 

**– 168** 

**– AD; Amendment**  **39**

**– 15478; AD 2008** 

**– 08** 

**– 24]**  **RIN 2120**

**– AA64**  

### Airworthiness Directives; Boeing **Model 737**

**– 600,** 

**– 700,** 

**– 700C,** 

**– 800, and** 

**– 900 Series Airplanes** 
**AGENCY** 

### : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. **ACTION** 

### : Final rule.

**SUMMARY** 

### : We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 737

– 600,

– 700,

– 700C,

– 800, and

– 900 series airplanes. This AD requires replacing the drain tube assemblies and support clamps on the aft fairing of the engine struts. This AD results from reports of failure of the drain tube assembly and clamp on the aft fairings of an engine strut. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the