alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Georgette LUNDQUIST, Appellant, v. LEE COUNTY and RH Venture II, LLC; RH Venture III; and Greenpointe Communities, LLC, Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D17-22

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 625 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 625

Recognizing the critical role of congressional staff and support staff 
       working on Capitol Hill and in State or district offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

 Mr. Connolly (for himself, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Mr. Morelle, and 
 Mr. Steil) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the critical role of congressional staff and support staff 
       working on Capitol Hill and in State or district offices.

Whereas there are nearly 15,000 congressional staff and thousands of support 
        staff working on Capitol Hill and in State or district offices;
Whereas congressional staff and support staff serve a critical role within the 
        United States system of government by supporting the legislative branch;
Whereas support staff serve as an essential resource and provide administrative, 
        technical, and operational services to the congressional community of 
        House of Representatives Members, officers, and staff;
Whereas congressional staff work with constituents from their home States and 
        districts to ensure that their constituents' voices are heard and that 
        their needs are represented;
Whereas congressional staff help constituents navigate Federal agencies to 
        resolve issues, such as the issuance and renewal of passports, 
        adjudication of immigration cases, and applications for Social Security 
        and veterans' benefits;
Whereas congressional staff help strengthen the bond between constituents and 
        Members of Congress;
Whereas congressional staff provide constituent services and help Congress solve 
        the Nation's most intractable challenges;
Whereas congressional staff give back to the national capital region, as well as 
        communities in their States and districts;
Whereas congressional staff are faithful public servants who serve the public 
        with the utmost respect and dignity;
Whereas congressional staff deserve to work in a safe and healthy environment, 
        as they do the people's work; and
Whereas congressional staff and support staff should be accepted, supported, and 
        treated with respect and dignity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the critical role of congressional staff and 
        support staff working on Capitol Hill and in State or district 
        offices; and
            (2) thanks congressional staff and support staff for the 
        commitment and essential services that they provide.
                                 <all>
```
A.J. Muldoon Office ofAviation Analysis 

### Bill Goertzen P.O. Box 211049 Auke Bay, AK 99821 August 10, 2012

U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAve. SE Room W86-489 Washington, DC 20590 Re: Docket DOT-OST-1997-3134 Dear Mr. Muldoon, I supportWard Air's proposal to continue to provide air service to Chatham, Alaska for the two year period beginning October 1, 1012. I own property in Chatham, Alaska and am a part-time resident there. I have flown with Ward Air for many years to and from Chatham. I have found their service very reliable and safe. They have also been very accommodating in adjusting their schedule to meet the needs ofthe residents and visitors to Chatham. This is very important since there is only once a month essential air service to Chatham. In addition, Ward Air's ability and willingness to utilize a Beaverwhen weather orthe customers' needs warrant use ofan aircraft largerthan a Cessna 206 is important to the service needs ofthe community. Accordingly, I recommend that you once again select Ward Air as the Essential Air Service provider for Chatham, Alaska. Thank you for your consideration of my comments.

# ~-;;il/1~1- 

# tcwQ**~ ~~**  Bill Goertzen

### 321-2?2~ 

### }?;/(

# '7 c:J Cjc 1Jlf!_

# -t
Miguel A. CUELLAR, Appellant, v. Natalie A. ORTIZ, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2913

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|   | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rider Exploration, Inc. for the year ended 10/31/10 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 10/31/10, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Rider Exploration Inc . |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |        |                                     |   |
|--------|-------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:         | /s/ Steve Friberg                        |   |
|   |        |                                     |   |
|   | Name   | Steve Friberg                            |   |
|   |        |                                     |   |
|   | Title  | Principal Executive Officer,             |   |
|   |        | Principal Financial Officer and Director |   |
|   |        |                                     |   |
|   | Date        | January 20, 2011                         |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             129,760
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      457,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   617,451
<PP&E>                                           3,507,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,532,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,535,374
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           166,014
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,808,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,532,936
<SALES>                                          4,029,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,041,199
<CGS>                                            4,567,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,567,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,077,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 728,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,331,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,331,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (387,921)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,719,871)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.49)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        60,253
<OTHER-SE>                      (60,253)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.00)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5628 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5628

 To provide for an initial period of admission of 36 months for aliens 
                       employed as dairy workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2006

  Mr. Pearce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for an initial period of admission of 36 months for aliens 
                       employed as dairy workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERIOD OF ADMISSION FOR ALIENS EMPLOYED AS DAIRY WORKERS.

    An alien admitted under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)) for 
employment as a dairy worker may be admitted for an initial period of 
36 months.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE Devon M. EASLEY

CR-15-1477

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Shelby Cir. Ct.
---

March 29, 2012

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Re:
    Primero Mining Corp. (the
      "Registrant")Annual Report on Form
      40-FConsent of Expert


This letter is provided in connection with the Companys annual
report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the "Annual Report").
The Annual Report incorporates by reference the Annual Information Form of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the AIF).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in the Annual Report
with reference to statements in the AIF regarding certain scientific and
technical information stated as being prepared by or under the supervision of
Rodney Webster, MAIG, Mr. Herbert A. Smith, P. Eng. and Mr. J. Morton Shannon,
P. Geo., all of AMC Consultants.

Sincerely,



|/s/ J. Morton
      Shannon | 
|--------------------------- | 
|J. Morton Shannon, P. Geo.  | 

---
Alexey BURYA and Le Jardin Residences Manager, LLC, Appellants, v. Maria KUZMINA and Nadezda Danilochkina, Appellees.

No. 3D16-2525

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EAG AMERICAS, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Juergen HEBERLEIN, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Eugene G. WALTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2704

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June

20 , 2024.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00330

- CR

IN RE CHAD STEVEN JOHNSON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 178th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1649527



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Monday, May 6, 2024 , relator Chad Steven Johnson filed a petition for
writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable Kelli
Johnson
, presiding judge of the 178th District Court of Harris County
, to rule o n
two nunc pro tunc motions

. Relator has not demonstrated he is entitled to mandamus relief. We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher, Justices Zimmerer
, and Wilson. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 28204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11506]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 16, 2013.

PLACE: CFTC Headquarters Conference Center, Three Lafayette Centre, 
1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS:  Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission has scheduled this meeting to 
consider various rulemaking matters, including the issuance of 
interpretive guidance and policy statement and the approval of final 
rules. The agenda for this meeting is available to the public and 
posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov. In the 
event that the time, date, or place of the meeting changes, an 
announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, or place of 
the meeting, will be posted on the Commission's Web site.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, Secretary of 
the Commission, 202-418-5516.

Melissa D. Jurgens,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-11506 Filed 5-10-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Lewis W. WHITAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Kyle ALEXANDER

No. 2016-KP-2096

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ASSUMPTION**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated at least four applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly report of Stock Market Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard Smitten, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Richard Smitten
------------------------
     Richard Smitten
     President, CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
     Accounting Officer

January 6, 2006
Jesus FERNANDEZ, et al., Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL FINANCE BANK, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-192

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1604

In re: FRANCISCO SALINAS-CASTILLO,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:10-cr-00188-REP)

Submitted: October 24, 2017 Decided: November 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francisco Salinas-Castillo, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Francisco Salinas-Castillo petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district 

court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to compel. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. We have determined that the district court denied

Salinas-Castillo’s motion on April 12, 2017. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED
EX PARTE Martiniz CURRY

CR-16-0107

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
June 10, 2015 

Mr. Robert Mays 

UAV Aeronautics Investigation & Logistics 

50 Lake Voyageur Drive 

The Woodlands, TX 77389 

Dear Mr. Mays: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1739), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000524 31-MAY-2018 08:22 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           106137
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     47018
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                      168305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 332114
<PP&E>                                           333396
<DEPRECIATION>                                   323257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   349831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             150331
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                        4472042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                      400000
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     349831
<SALES>                                          502503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 502503
<CGS>                                            294063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    294063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   36134
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               36134
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      36134
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.00


</TABLE>
IN RE: Joseph Aiavolasiti KOTT

NO. 2018-OB-0338

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status, IT IS ORDERED that Joseph Aiavolasiti Kott, Louisiana Bar Roll number 32073, be and he hereby is transferred to disability inactive status. All disciplinary proceedings against respondent shall be deferred until such time as he resumes active status.

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order shall be effective immediately.

Guidry, J., recused.