alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 774 

Recognizing the influx of known or suspected terrorists through America’s 

northern border as a threat to national security. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2023 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. ZINKE) submitted the 

following resolution 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the influx of known or suspected terrorists 

through America’s northern border as a threat to national security. 

Whereas, in fiscal year 2023, the number of known or suspected terrorists encountered along our northern border 

within U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Terrorist 

Screening Data Set Encounters program totaled 432; 

Whereas, in fiscal year 2023, the number of known or suspected terrorists encountered along our northern border 

has increased by 38 percent from fiscal year 2022, and 

685 percent from fiscal year 2021; 

Whereas, since President Biden took office in January 2021, 

the number of encounters along our northern border has 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 774 IH 

risen from 997 monthly encounters to 19,835 encounters 

in August 2023, a 1,889-percent increase; 

Whereas, since President Biden took office in January 2021, 

the number of encounters along our northern border between ports of entry has risen from 44 monthly encounters to 1,054 encounters in August 2023, a 2,295 percent 

increase; 

Whereas America’s northern border, the longest international 

border in the world, measuring 5,525 miles, has only 140 

ports of entry with no performance measures to assess 

security between ports; 

Whereas U.S. Border Patrol staffing on our northern border 

has remained stagnant since fiscal year 2009; and 

Whereas the Department of Homeland Security, under President Biden’s and Secretary Mayorkas’ leadership, has 

failed to adequately respond to the crisis at the northern 

border: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the border crisis along our north3 ern border; 

4 (2) recognizes the influx of terrorism through 

5 our northern border as a threat to national security; 

6 and 

7 (3) demands Secretary Mayorkas implement a 

8 plan to better secure our northern border. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
STATE EX REL. Joshua D. BROOKS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0054

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in state collateral proceedings in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant the writ and assigns reasons.

In 2013, Defendant was convicted of second degree murder as a result of an offense he committed in 2009, when he was 16 years old. Defendant was subsequently sentenced to 60 years imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole. In my view, defendant's 60-year sentence without parole is effectively a life sentence. In light of the Supreme Court's holding in *Montgomery v. Louisiana* , 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed. 2d 599 (2016) that *Miller v. Alabama* , 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed. 2d 407 (2012) announced a substantive rule of constitutional law that applies retroactively, I would grant defendant's writ, vacate his sentence, and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the *1182views expressed in *State v. Montgomery* , 13-1163 (La. 6/28/16), 194 So.3d 606, and for re-sentencing pursuant to La. C.Cr. P. Art. 878.1.

Hughes, J., would grant for an evidentiary hearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         727,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,409,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                   595,477
<INVENTORY>                                 33,142,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,022,762
<PP&E>                                      13,733,966
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,053,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,138,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,422,090
<BONDS>                                     28,383,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,250
<COMMON>                                       148,825
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,281,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                81,138,067
<SALES>                                    107,993,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           107,993,318
<CGS>                                       88,049,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               88,049,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,990,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,451,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                604,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            604,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (616,239)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,569)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        

</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 630 

Recognizing August 1, National Night Out, the national coming together 

of Americans all over the Nation to unite and promote public safety. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mrs. TORRES of California (for herself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing August 1, National Night Out, the national coming together of Americans all over the Nation to unite 

and promote public safety. 

Whereas, on the first Tuesday of August, the Nation will observe National Night Out, a day to cultivate a better relationship between residents of a community and their 

local law enforcement, and to promote public safety; 

Whereas the participation in National Night Out by over 

38,000,000 neighbors in over 16,000 communities across 

the United States for over 39 years is inspiring; 

Whereas the relationship between local law enforcement and 

the residents which they are sworn to protect is important in creating a true sense of community; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 630 IH 

Whereas general awareness of public safety has improved, because of the continued efforts of communities to meet 

their law enforcement officers and participate in National 

Night Out activities; and 

Whereas National Night Out not only includes Americans on 

the mainland, but includes those in United States territories and military bases to ensure all are included in the 

effort of community building and public safety awareness: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) encourages law enforcement departments to 

3 use National Night Out to improve relationships 

4 with the communities they serve; 

5 (2) encourages public safety departments to in6 form communities— 

7 (A) how to most effectively contact their 

8 911 responders and emergency service pro9 viders; and 

10 (B) how they carry out their duties; and 

11 (3) recognizes the impact that has been made 

12 for over 39 years in communities all over the United 

13 States of America by National Night Out in creating 

14 a more united country by fostering relationships be15 tween residents, neighbors, and local law enforce16 ment, and promoting public safety awareness. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         646,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  670,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,317,333
<PP&E>                                      17,077,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,395,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,143,936
<BONDS>                                      2,468,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,352,915
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,570,066)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,395,294
<SALES>                                        973,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               973,149
<CGS>                                          741,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  741,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               882,243
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             168,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 682,368
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (65,077)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Leon T. REID, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3900

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
H. Res. 583 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 13, 2023. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for further consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2670) to authorize appropriations for fiscal 

year 2024 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, and for defense activities 

of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel 

strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 

SEC. 2. (a) No further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution and 

amendments en bloc described in section 3 of this resolution. 

(b) Each further amendment printed in the report of the 

Committee on Rules shall be considered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 
2 

•HRES 583 EH 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. 

(c) All points of order against the further amendments 

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules or amendments en bloc described in section 3 of this resolution are 

waived. 

SEC. 3. It shall be in order at any time for the chair of 

the Committee on Armed Services or his designee to offer 

amendments en bloc consisting of amendments printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution not earlier disposed of. Amendments en bloc offered pursuant to this section shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Armed Services or their respective designees, shall not be 

subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand 

for division of the question in the House or in the Committee 

of the Whole. 

SEC. 4. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill, as 

amended, to the House with such further amendments as 

may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any fur-
3 

•HRES 583 EH 

ther amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 

motion except one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 99.15**

 
|                                                           | **Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Suite 501, 55 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5J 2H7 |
| **T** (416) 947-0907 **F** (416) 947-0395                 |
| **www.rpacan.com**                                        |
|                                                      |

 

**CONSENT OF****WAYNE W. VALLIANT**

 

In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 40-F of Franco-Nevada Corporation, I consent to references to my name and to the use of the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Goldstrike Mine, Eureka and Elko Counties, State of Nevada, USA” and dated March 16, 2012 (the “Report”) in the 2011 Annual Information Form of Franco-Nevada Corporation dated March 26, 2012 (the “AIF”), which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated in, the Form 40-F.

 

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-176856) and on Form F-10 (No. 333-176722) of the references to my name and the use of the Report. I also consent to reference to me under the heading “Experts” in the AIF which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report on Form 40-F which is incorporated by reference in such Registration Statements.

 

 
| DATED:   March 29, 2012 |                            |   |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                         |                            |   |
| /s/   Wayne W. Valliant      |                            |   |
|                         |                            |   |
| Name:                        | Wayne   W. Valliant, P.Geo.     |   |   |
|                         | Principal   Geologist           |   |   |
|                         | Roscoe   Postle Associates Inc. |   |   |

 

----
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 26, 2015

No. 04-14-00882-CR

Darius DUKES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-12-040

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On March 12, 2015, appellant’s court-appointed attorney, Mr. Patrick Maguire, filed a 

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no 

meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his 

own brief and obtain a copy of the record. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, 

no pet.). On March 20, 2015, the State filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief 

unless the appellant files a pro se brief. 

Despite requests from the clerk of this court that he do so, Mr. Maguire did not provide 

appellant with a copy of the record or provide him with a form motion requesting access to the 

record from this court as required by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 

313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).1 Therefore, appellant may obtain a copy of the appellate record by 

filing a pro se motion for access to the appellate record, not later than April 14, 2015, with the 

clerk of this court, addressed to Clerk, Fourth Court of Appeals, 300 Dolorosa St., Suite 3200, 

San Antonio, Texas 78205. If appellant files a written request for the record with this court, the 

clerk of this court is ORDERED to immediately send a copy of the record to appellant.

If the appellant does not request access to the record, but still desires to file a pro se brief, 

he must do so no later than April 27, 2015. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If appellant 

requests access to the record, this briefing deadline will be reset.

1 Mr. Maguire is cautioned that in the future he either provide his client with a copy of the record or a form motion 

for his client to file with this court accompanied by instructions to sign and where to file such motion. 

 
If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than 

thirty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED 

that the motion to withdraw, filed by Mr. Maguire, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further 

order of the court.

We further ORDER the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, Mr. 

Maguire, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of March, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEE ROBERT SCOTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-613

[July 19, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Edward Harold 

Merrigan, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 91-7545-CF-10A.

Lee Robert Scott, Mayo, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 61 (Wednesday, April 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Neurological 
Disorders and Stroke. The meeting will be closed to the public as 
indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 
552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and 
evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by 
the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
    Date: May 17-18, 2009.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Alan P. Koretsky, PhD, Scientific Director, 
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Neurological 
Disorders & Stroke, NIH, 35 Convent Drive, Room 6a 908, Bethesda, Md 
20892, 301-435-2232, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#117a7e637465627a6870517f787f75623f7f78793f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1dadec3d4c5c2dac8d0f1dfd8dfd5c29fdfd8d99fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 26, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-7310 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>