alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, A. Leon Blaser, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the “report”) of Environmental Energy Services, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [omitted]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Paul Lachu GIBSON v. STATE

CR-15-1345

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Robert D. MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-873

Supreme Court of Florida.

[January 26, 2018]

James Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Ann Marie Mirialakis, and Ali Andrew Shakoor, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Scott A. Browne, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Robert D. Morris's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Morris's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Morris's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Morris's appeal pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Morris responded to this Court's order to show *325cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Morris's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Morris is not entitled to relief. Morris was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of eight to four, and his sentence of death became final in May 2002. *Morris v. State*, 811 So.2d 661, 664 (Fla. 2002). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Morris's sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Morris's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Morris, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.
----

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2005/C 209/02)

2.   Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

----

(1)OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

(2)  Telefax : (32-2) 295 65 05.

----
Keisha ANDRE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Virginia Torres MORENO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
David ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-2336

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

January 4, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Justin Flowers Exemption Request Under Section 333 

of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Justin Flowers, an operator of Small Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography and videography, 

seeks exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow 

commercial operation of the previously approved Yuneec Typhoon, Yuneec Tornado, 

3DR Solo, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 3, Aeronavics Skyjib X4 XL, Leptron RDASS 

Q1000, Leptron Avenger, and the HSE-UAV Alliance within the National Airspace System 

(NAS) for controlled, low-risk, aerial video and photography, aerial terrain mapping and 

survey, precision agriculture survey and analysis, cinematography, construction data 

collection, maritime inspection / data collection, search & rescue, utility inspection, 

railroad inspection, and crop and livestock data collection over certain areas of the United 

States, conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein, or as may be 

established by the FAA, as required by Section 333 requirements. 

Justin Flowers in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements of 

14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

Justin Flowers has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition 

because it would not set any precedent and because the relief requested is identical to 

numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, Justin Flowers will be utilizing the proven technologies the FAA has already 

accepted and approved in numerous other approved exemptions. Combined, the
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

comprehensive Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to 

these chosen products and the technology, should provide the support necessary to the 

FAA for a Summary Grant of Justin Flowers’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the

process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 08/12/2010 04:11 PM Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Interagency Discussion about the c larific ation of more info in RIA pertaining to NESHAP: Mercury Emissions from Mercury Cell Chlor

- Alkali Plants 2060

- AN99

Hi Sharon,

The interagency reviewers have raised questions about the methodology used to transform electricity consumption reductions into a ir emissions reductions, and in turn, into monetized health benefits.

Those questions are as follows:
1. In Table 5

- 2 (and Appendix B

- 2), the estimated reduction in electr icity consumption is assumed to result in an equal amount of reduced electricity pro duction. Can EPA please explain that basis of that assumption? Furthermore, no price effect was estimated for the consumption reduction and demand reduction. Can EPA explain why the analysis did not consider price effects of this reduced demand?

2. The analysis assumes that the reduction in production will occur at the nearest power plant to the
chlor

- alkali facility. Can EPA explain that assumption? Alternatively, wa s the use of regional emissions factors (emissions/kWh) considered? Finally, is EPA assuming that the energy portfolio mix for these providers from 2010 will remain the same in 2013?

3. The emissions factors used are pulled from 2 sources

-- eGrid (NOx, SO2, CO2, and Hg) and COBRA (PM2.5, NH3, VOC). As EPA stated in their response, the emission in formation for eGRID is based on 2005 data and the emissions inventory for CAIR was developed in 2005, and projected to 2010 and 2015. Were any adjustments made to account for the fact that emissi ons factors may be different in
2013 than in the baseline or projection years? That is, are these emission factors accurate for 2013? If not, what are the uncertainties in these emissions factors? Did EPA consider regulations or other factors that would change those emissions factors by 2013?

4. The link provided to the benefits per ton estimates ( http://www.epa.gov/air/benmap/bpt.html ) shows a series of tables for different analysis years (2015, 2020, 2025). Can EPA explain what dollar year
thos e numbers are in (e.g. the analysis year), and what VSL was used?

5. Has EPA considered that for units subject to trading under the Aci d Rain program or other trading programs, the estimated emission reductions may not occur bec ause the reductions would o ccur elsewhere because of trading?

And more generally:
1. This co

- benefit analysis presumes there is a single preexisting market failure

-- direct PM and PM precursor emissions from electricity. Did EPA consider other market failures for their analysis: imperfect

compe tition, other pollutants, labor income taxes, etc.

Regards, Cortney
----

Removal from the Register of Case T-145/97 (1)

(2005/C 217/135)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 16 June 2005, the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-145/97, J.P.W. Vrencken v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities.

----

(1)OJ C 142 of 10.5.1997.

----
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0336 -----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:33PM ----- To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov From: Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US Date: 02/12/2010 11:58AM cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Glenn Sheriff/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Nagelhout/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nathalie Simon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: Revised RIA for final CI RICE NESHAP

Cortney, attached are redline/strikeout and clean versions of the RIA as of this date. I think Melanie didn't attach these RIA versions to her last email, but here they are. Thanks.

(See attached file: CI RICE NESHAP RIA_for OMB2-12-10redlinestrikeout.doc) (See attached file: CI RICE NESHAP RIA_for OMB2-12-10clean.doc)

Larry Sorrels Economist US EPA/OAQPS/HEID/ABCG C439-02 RTP, NC 27711 (919) 541-5041 fax: (919) 541-0839

Page 1
Leo TERMINELLO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1187

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Ronel OSCAR, Appellant, v. John LONG, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-193

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Rafael LEYVA, Appellant, v. Fathima LEYVA, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1686

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Norma LEON-ARISTIDE, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Fanny LOPEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0216

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Alvon HICKMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David Gee, SHERIFF, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 08, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Rafael Padilla SOTO, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2464

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-1417

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM159AD

A300-53-6123, R05 --- 8/1/11

A300-53-6123, R04 --- 4/25/08

A300-53-6123, R03 --- 8/20/04

A300-53-6123, R01 --- 12/18/01

A300-53-0350, R02 --- 11/12/02

A300-53-0350, R01 --- 12/18/01

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Polaris  Income  Fund  I  (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
R.  Carpenter,  President  of Polaris  Investment  Management  Corporation,  the
General Partner of the Partnership,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Partnership.


POLARIS AIRCRAFT INCOME FUND I
(Registrant)
By: Polaris Investment Management Corporation
    General Partner


By: /s/ William R. Carpenter
    -------------------------
    William R. Carpenter
    President
    August 19, 2002
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Changyou.com Limited (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alex Ho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.



/s/ Alex HoName:

Alex HoTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

February 26, 2010
EX PARTE Doyle Maxwell THOMASON

CR-15-1481

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 7, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE SALE AND
SERVICING AGREEMENT AND
ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB
  (i)
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended
March 31, 2009, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my
supervision.(ii)
    
    To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period
in all material respects.
 rd
 /s/ Paul C. HondaPaul C. HondaAssistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary, and
Compliance Officer

(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
Josh NEGRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4432

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,137]


New Page Corporation, a Subsidiary of Cerberus Capital 
Management, LP; Rumford, ME; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 5, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official, the International Brotherhood of 
United Electrical Workers, Local 2144, and the United Steel Workers, 
Local 900, on behalf of workers of New Page Corporation, a subsidiary 
of Cerberus Capital Management, LP, Rumford, Maine.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7140 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
January 13, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RUBY YARBROUGH AND WILBURN E. YARBROUGH, Appellants

NO. 14-13-00932-CV V.

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION III, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Household 

Finance Corporation III, signed September 20, 2013, was heard on the transcript of 

the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We 

therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the 

cause with instruction to dismiss the cause.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Household Finance Corporation III.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.

</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                            6,178 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                      0    
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  6,178 
<PP&E>                             0    
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    6,178 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        18,189,519 
<BONDS>                      43,236,631 
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                 (141,752,940)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      6,178 
<SALES>                            0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   0    
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                316,288 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            2,273,347 
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (2,589,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (6,680,338)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                 (6,680,338)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (6,280)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (6,280)

        

</TABLE>