**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (**  **40 CFR Part 60, Subpart UU )**  **(Renewal) 1. Identification of the Information Collection**  **1(a) Title of the Information Collection** NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart UU) (Renewal), EPA I CR Number 0661.1 1 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0002

. **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture were proposed on November 18, 1980, promulgated on August 6, 1982 , and amended on October 17, 2000 . These regulations apply to each existing and new saturator and asphalt storage facilities at asphalt roofing pl ants, and to asphalt storage tanks and blowing stills at asphalt processing plants, petroleum refineries, and asphalt roofing plants. New facilities include those that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is be ing collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart UU. In general, all NSPS standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to mainta in records of the occurrence and duration of an y startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility , or any period during which the monitoring sy stem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determ ining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NSPS. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least two years following the date of such m easurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regio nal office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of four affected facilities at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an average of 14 4 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the se standard s , and 2 respondents per ye ar will undergo reconstruction and become new sources subject to the se same standard s
. The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) approved the currentl y active I CR without any

“Terms of Clearance.”2

The respondents are asphalt processing and roofing manufacture plants in the United States, all which are privately

- owned , for

- profit businesses. None of the facilities are owned either by state, or local, or tribal entities , or by the Federal government. The “burden ” to the “Affected Public” may

be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart UU) (Renewal). The Federal Government “burden ” is attributed entirely to work performed by either F ederal employees or government contractors and may be found below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart UU) (Renewal).
**2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended, to establish standards of performance for new stationary sources that reflect:

**. . .** application of the best technological sy stem of continuous emissions reduction which (taking into consideration the cost of achieving such emissions reduction, or an y non - air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrat or determines has been adequatel y demonstrated. Section 111(a)(l). The Agency

refers to this charge as selecting the best demonstrated technology (BDT). Section 111 also requires that the Administrator review and, if appropriate, revise such standards e very four years. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C) install, use, and maintain such moni toring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment, particulate matter emissions from asphalt processing and roofing manufacture cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NSPS were promulgated for this source3

category at 40 CFR part 60, subpart UU

. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the se standard s ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard s
. Continuous e mission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters und er which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notifications required in the se standard s are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject t o the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated , leaks are being detected and repaired , and the standard s are being met. The perfor

mance test may

also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations. **3. Non**
**- duplication, Consult**  **ations, and Other Collection Criteria** The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 60, subpart UU

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exist. **3(b) Pub lic Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register ( 78 FR 35023 ) on June 11, 2013

. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.4

**3(c) Consultations** The Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have been considered. The primary source of information as rep orted b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the collection, m aintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the se standard s as they were being developed and the se standard s have been reviewed previously to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. Indeveloping this ICR, we contacted : 1) the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA) , at (202) 207

- 0917 ; and 2) the Energy Information Administration (EIA) , at (202) 586

- 1134. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. In this case, no comments were received. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likel y. **3(e) General Guidelines**
T hese reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).5

**3(g) Sensitive Questions**
T he reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested**  **4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes** The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are asphalt processing and roofing manufacture facilities . The United States Standard Industrial Classification ( SI C ) code s for the respondents affect ed b y the standards and the correspond ing North American Industry Classification Sy stem (NAICS ) codes are listed in the table below:
**Standard ( 40 CFR**  **P art 60,**  **S ubpart UU**  **) SIC Codes**  **NAICS Codes** Petroleum Refineries 2911 324110 Asphalt Paving Mixtures and Block Manufacturing 2951 324121 Asphalt Felts and Coatings 2952 324122 **4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items** 
In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required b y the NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR P art 60, S ubpart UU)

. A source must make the following reports:

**Notification s**  **/Reports** Notification of construction/reconstruction 60.7(a)(1) Notification of actual startup date 60.7(a)(3) Notification of ph ys ical or operational change which may increase the emission rate 60.7(a)(4 ) Notification of demonstration of continuous monitoring s ys tem 60.7(a)(5) Notification of initial performance test 60.8(d) Report of initial performance test 6 0.8(c) A source must keep the following records:6 **Recordkeeping** Startup, shutdown, malfunctions, periods where the continuous monitoring sy stem is inoperative 60.7(b) Operating temperature measurements of pollution control devices as appropriate, and the initial performance test results including temperature measurements 60.7(d) Continuously

monitor and record the temperature of the gas at the inlet of the control device 60.473(a) Continuously

monitor and record the temperature in the combustion zone of the afterburner 60.472(b)(1) For control devices not mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, describing the operation of the control device and the process parameter(s) 60.473(c) Records are required to be retained for two ye ars 60.7(f) Electronic Reporting Some of the r espondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden as sociated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with th e respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely us ed. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respon dents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate temperature monitoring device

. Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 5A, 9, and 22 test s , and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above.7 **Respondent Activities** Submit the required repo rts developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way ( e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem ) . Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this ty pe of monitoring equipment has significantl y reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Method ology, and**  **Information Management 5(a) Agency Activities**  EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analy sis, storage, and distribution of the required information. **Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management**  Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are p roperl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a s ource ’ s initial capability to comp ly with the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem8

identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y loca l and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for two ye ars. **5 (c) Small Entity Flexibility**  A majority

of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the ty pes of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum require ments needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The sp ecific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart UU) (Renewal)

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection**  Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where ver appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Ag ency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these record

keeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 33, 912 hours ( Total Labor Hours from9

Table 1 below ). T hese hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NSPS program, the previously

approved IC R, and any

comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $ 123.04 ($5 8

. 59 + 110%) Technical $ 10 1

. 2 2 ($4 8

. 2 0 + 110%) Clerical $ 51

. 18 ($2 4

. 37 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2013 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are one

- time costs incurred when a facility

become s subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor(s) and other costs such as photocopying and postage. **(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**

**Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**  (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F) Tem perature Monitors $100,000 2 $200,000 $35,000 144 $5, 040 ,000 **T OTAL**  **$200,000 $5,040,000**  The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $ 200,000 . This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $ 5, 040 ,000

. This is10

the total of column G. The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 5, 240 ,000

. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program i ncludes such activities as the examination of records maint ained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 1 2 3 , 788

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 3 General Schedule , which excludes locality , rates of pay

. The rates have been increased b y 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in T able 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart UU) (Renewal). **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, approximately 14 4 existing respondents will be subject to the standard s on average over the next three years
. It is estimated that an additional two respondents per ye ar will become subject due to reconstruction of ex isting sources . The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below, is 14 4 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR :11 **Number of Respondents**

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 2 144 0 2 144
2 2 14 4 0 2 14 4
3 2 14 4 0 2 14 4 **Average 2**  **14 4**  **0 2**  **14 4**  1 New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities. In this standard existing respondents submit initial notifications. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 14 4

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:
**Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D Notification and application of construction/ reconstruction 2 1 N/A 2 Notification of actual startup 2 1 N/A 2 Notification of physical or operational change which may increase the emission rate 2 1 N/A 2
Notification of demonstration of continuous monitoring system. 2 1 N/A 2
Notification of initial performance test 2 1 N/A 2 Report of initial performance test 2 1 N/A 2 Semiannual reports 14 4 2 N/A 28 8

**TOTAL 300** 
The number of Total Annual Responses is 300

.12

The total annual labor costs are $3, 317 , 16 8

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 6 0, Subpart UU)

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 33, 912 at a cost of $3,317,168

. Details regarding these estimates may

be found below in Table 1 : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart UU)

. Furth ermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 113 hours per response

. The total , annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $5, 240 ,000

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

**(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 2,7 47 labor hours at a cost of $ 12 3 , 788 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart UU)

. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is no change in the labor hours in this I CR compared to the previous ICR. This is du e to two considerations. First, the regulations have not changed over the past three years and are not anticipated to change over the next three years. Second, the growth rate for the respondents is very

low, negative, or non

- existent. Therefore, the burden hours in the previous ICR reflect the current burden and are reiterated in this I CR. However, there is an adjustment decrease in the respondent cost and an adjustment increase in the Agency cost due to an update in labor rates. **6(g) Burden Statem ent**  The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 113 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating,13

and verifying information, process ing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data so urces; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for t his I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2013

- 0326

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are al so available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 1 752

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 20 13

- 0326 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0002 in any correspondence.
**Par t B of the Supporting Statement**  This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.14

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost** 

**– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60,**  **Subpart UU) (Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **Person**
  ** hours per** **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person**
  ** hours per** **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per**  **year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost ($) b** 

1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting requirements A. Read instructions 1 1 1 2 2 0.1 0.2 $224.98 B. Required activities Initial performance tests **c** 72 1 72 2 144 7.2 14.4 $16,198.56 Repeat of performance test **d** 72 1 72 0.2 14.4 0.72 1.44 $1,619.86 C. Create Information See 3B D. Gather existing information See 3B E. Write report Notification of construction/ reconstruction e 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $449.96 Notification and demonstration of CMS f 40 1 40 2 80 4 8 $8,999.20 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $449.96 Notification of initial performance test 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $449.96 Report of performance test See 3B Notification of physical or operational change g 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $467.55 Semiannual reports 24 2 48 144 6,912 345.6 691.2 $777,530.88 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements**  **8,24 3.66**  **$806,390.91** 4. Recordkeeping requirements A. Read instructions See 3A B. Plan activities See 3B C. Implement activities See 3B D. Develop record system N/A E. Time to enter information Records of daily production rate and hours of operation h 0.13 250 32.5 144 4,680 234 468 $526,453.20 Records of operating parameters of CMS i 0.25 250 62.5 144 9,000 450 900 $1,012,410.0015

**Burden item (A)**  **Person**
  ** hours per** **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person**
  ** hours per** **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per**  **year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost ($) b** 

Records of startup, shutdow n, and malfunctions j 60 1 60 144 8,640 432 864 $971,913.60 F. Train personnel N/A G. Audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements**  **25,668 $2,510,776.80**  **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded) 33,912**  **$3,317,16 8** 

**Assu mptions:** 
a. We have assumed that the average number of respondents that are subje ct to the regulation will be 14 4 with two source undergoing reconstruction per year over the three

- year period of this ICR. b. This ICR uses the following labor rates: $123.04 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $101.22 per ho ur for Technical labor, and $51.18 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bure au of Labor Statistics, March 2013, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total Compensation.” The rates have been increas ed by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those em ployed by private industry.
c We have assumed that it will take 72 hours of each respondent to perform initial performance test. d. We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will fail the performance test and will have to repeat it.
e. We have assumed that each respondent will take two hours to w rite notification of construction/reconstruction report. f. We have assumed that each respondent will take 40 hours to w rite notification and demonstration of CMS report. g. We have assumed that each respondent will take 2 hours to w rite notification of physical or operational change. h. We have assumed that each respondent will enter information of daily production rate and hours of operation 250 times per year. i. We h ave assumed that each respondent will take 15 minutes 250 times per year to record the operating parameters of CMS. j. We have assumed that each respondent will take 60 hours to record startup, shutdown, and malfunction information.16

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost** 

**– NSPS for Asphalt Processing and Roofing Manufacture (40 CFR Part 60,**  **Subpart UU) (Renewal)**

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person**
  ** hours per** **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person**  **** **hours per plant per**  **year (C=AxB)**  **(D)**

**Plants per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(H)**

**Cost ($) b** 

Initial performance tests New or modified facility **c** 24 1 24 2 48 2.4 4.8 $2,487.58 Repeat performance test New or modified facility **d** 24 0.2 4.8 2 9.6 0.48 0.96 $497.52 Report review New or modified facility Notification of construction/reconstruction e 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $207.30 Notification of physical/operational changes f 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $207.30 Notification of actual startup 0.5 1 0.5 2 1 0.05 0.1 $51.82 Notification of performance test 0.5 1 0.5 2 1 0.05 0.1 $51.82 Review of performance test results **g** 8 1 8 2 16 0.8 1.6 $829.19 Notification of demonstration of CMS 0.5 1 0.5 2 1 0.05 0.1 $51.82 Semiannual reports 8 2 16 144 2,304 115.2 230.4 $119,403.65 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  **2,747 $123,788** 
**Assu mptions**  :

a. We have assumed that the average n umber of respondents will be 14 4 with two source undergoing reconstruction per year over the three

- year period of this ICR b. The cost is based on the following labor rate which incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for governme nt overhead expenses. Managerial rates of $62.27, Technical rate of $ 46.21, and Clerical rate of $25.01. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2013 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay.
c. We have assumed that it will take 24 hours of each res pondent to perform initial performance test. d. We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will fail the performance test and will have to repeat it.
e. We have assumed that it will take each respondent two hours one

- time per year to review notification of construction/reconstruction report. f. We have assumed that it will take each respondent two hours one

- time per year to review notification of physic al/operation changes. g. We have assumed that it will take each respondent eight hours one

- time per year to review the performance test results report.17