alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RE: Docket FAA-2015-1207 , Exemption No. 12499 Petition for Amendment to Exe mption

Request Skanska USA Civil requested an FAA Exemption No. 1249 9 (Docket FAA-2015-1207) on April 27, 2015 under section 333 of the FAA Modernization and R eform Act of 2012 to operate an unmanned aircraft system (“UAS”), the Inspire 1, for various commercial purposes. In this present petition for an amendment to Docket FAA-2015-1207, Skanska USA Civil seeks to operate DJI ‘Inspire 1’ for the same purposes. The Inspire 1, weighing 6.47 pounds (Maximum Takeoff Weight), contains a rich array of advanced integrated sensors and GPS.

• The Inspire 1 UAS is designed to hover in place via GPS sensors and operate in less than 10m/s knots wind.

• Built in safety systems include sonar and visual sens ors to maintain safe flying indoors with minimal GPS signal or the system malfun ctions. The inspire 1 will slowly descend to its takeoff origin until the oper ator commands are received or the GPS signal is regained.

• The built in CPU chip 

### takes in feedback and outputs data in real-time, an d is intelligent enough to distinguish between objects a nd ground patterns. All of this data is given to your Inspire 1’s flight contr oller, which in turn communicates with the entire aircraft to maintain s afe operating perameters Inspire 1 offers different flight modes to suit eve ry project: Waypoints mode you can record a flight path, and then tell your Phantom 3 or Inspire 1 to fly along the same path repeatedly while you control the camera and orientation. Course lo ck mode allows you to easily fly along a set path by putting your platform into Course Lock, which sets all flight controls to directions relative to its current heading. The Inspire 1 is particularly safe. It is a small, li ghtweight UAS made of Skanska USA Civil will comply with all of the conditi ons and limitations imposed in Exemption 12499 (Docket FAA-2015-1207) except that condition/limitation number 1 will need to be revised to include the DJI Inspire 1 UAS. The lis t of “operating documents” will also need to be revised to include DJI’s (operating manual and safety assessment) for the DJI Inspire 1 UAS, which will be provided separately to the FAA if need ed. Other than these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons relative t o public safety that were the basis for the initial grant of exemption request. Because the requested amendment would not set any pr ecedent or otherwise raise any novel issue, and because Skanska USA Civil seeks to begin th ese operations without delay, SkanskaUSA Civil respectfully requests the FAA to determin e that good cause exists to dispense with

publication of the summary of this petition in the F ederal Register and grant the requested amendment expeditiously by summary means. Thank you for your consideration of this petition. Sincerely, Andrew Deveney, GPS Systems Manager
Teresa CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ON BEHALF OF the REGISTERED HOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I LLC, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-AC1, et al., Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-1618

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 28, 2017 Rehearing/Rehearing En Banc Denied January 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kenneth Leon MORROW v. STATE

CR-15-1207

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.                    

*Date:*                         May 17-18, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         7 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alan P. Koretsky, PhD, Scientific Director, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke, NIH, 35 Convent Drive, Room 6a 908, Bethesda, Md 20892, 301-435-2232,                         *koretskya@ninds.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 26, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-7310 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 453 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2403) to amend chapter 44 

of title 18, United States Code, to strengthen the background check 

procedures to be followed before a Federal firearms licensee may transfer 

a firearm to a person who is not such a licensee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2023 

Mr. CLYBURN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2403) to amend 

chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to strengthen 

the background check procedures to be followed before 

a Federal firearms licensee may transfer a firearm to 

a person who is not such a licensee. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution, the House shall proceed to the consideration in 

3 the House of the bill (H.R. 2403) to amend chapter 44 

4 of title 18, United States Code, to strengthen the back5 ground check procedures to be followed before a Federal 

6 firearms licensee may transfer a firearm to a person who 

7 is not such a licensee. All points of order against considerVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:33 May 26, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR453.IH HR453

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 453 IH 

1 ation of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered 

2 as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 

3 are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

4 ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

5 passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

6 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

7 ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judici8 ary or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to 

9 recommit. 

10 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

11 the consideration of H.R. 2403. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive


Officer of Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:





1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of


Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.





Dated: September 15, 2011





/s/ J. Michael King


J. Michael King,


Interim President/CFO








The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor


shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or


otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section


906, has been provided to Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. and will be retained by Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. and furnished to the


Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX PARTE Willie Leon BANKS

CR-15-1368

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 3, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Fred HARRIS Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1662

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Robert Klein, President and Chief Executive Officer of Shotgun Energy Corporation, a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:November 16, 2007



/s/ Robert Klein

----------------

Robert Klein

President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Petrobras Argentina
S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Luis Miguel Sas    
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Luis Miguel Sas        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael SUTTLES, Appellant.

No. ED 106859

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: June 11, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Michael Suttles appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for statutory sodomy, sexual misconduct with a child and furnishing pornographic material to a minor. There was no error in the admission of expert testimony regarding the general characteristics of children disclosing allegations of sexual abuse. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triple-S Management Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.        Date: May 14, 2007 By:  /s/    Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas    *President and*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRY LAMAR BRICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-92-328, CA-95-701)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Lamar Brice, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for reconsideration in this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Brice v. United States, No. CR-92-328; CA95-701 (D.S.C. July 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Veramark Technologies, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald C.
Lundy, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Ronald C. Lundy
-------------------
Ronald C. Lundy
Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer
November 13, 2003
Mr. Robert Rogers 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

APR l 9 2016 

Manager, Pollution Control Section 

Memphis-Shelby County Health Department 

814 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 437 

Memphis, Tennessee 38105 

Dear Mr. Rogers: 

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency's FY 2015 Air Pollution Control grant 

authorized by §105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency's various grant commitments 

and their status. Since there were no issues and no adjustments necessary, your report is now finalized. 

Thjs letter documents the conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations 35.115 and identified as a commitment in your FY 2015 Air Planning Agreement under 

Cross Cutting Issues. 

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2015 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to 

protect and improve air quality. If you have any questions regarding your grant, please contact Stuart 

Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Gwendolyn Grafat (404) 562-9289. 

Enclosure 

suz:-ea~ Carol L. Kemker 

Acting Director 

Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
Jackson SLOAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady C. JUDD, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14157-14158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6975]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Bankruptcy Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES: October 1-2, 2009.

Time:  8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Langham Hotel, 250 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.


[[Page 14158]]


    Dated: March 24, 2009.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. E9-6975 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
Larry M. BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 20, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Orlando Samuel MCKEITHEN v. STATE

CR-15-1218

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Alfonso RAZZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2400

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 7, 2018

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

***ON MOTION FOR REHEARING***

Per Curiam.

We deny appellant's motion for rehearing and amended motion for rehearing, but withdraw our previously issued per curiam decision and substitute the following in its place.

*Affirmed.* *Taylor v. State* , 114 So.3d 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ; *contra* *463*Lewars v. State* , 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1098, --- So.3d ---- (Fla. 2d DCA May 12, 2017), *review granted* , No. SC17-1002, 2017 WL 4022360 (Fla. Sept. 13, 2017).

Gerber, C.J., May and Levine, JJ., concur.