alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,792]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 31, 2008 in response to a petition filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers of Aetrium Corporation, Corporate Division, North St. Paul, Minnesota.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-7124 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
----

Amendment by France of public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Ajaccio, Bastia, Calvi and Figari, and Paris-Orly airport

(2005/C 149/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>      0000745895
<NAME>     BOETTCHER PENSION INVESTORS, LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                        817,860 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  41,004 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0       
<PP&E>                                      6,035,967      
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              6,894,831      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0    
<BONDS>                                     5,721,089  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                                    974,680       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                6,894,831         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              568,187          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              180,015       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            272,584       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               115,588       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  115,588 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        

</TABLE>
Petro Deran PUGH v. STATE

CR-15-1033

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

List of approved firms

Article 92(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 (sale of wine alcohol for use as bioethanol in the fuel sector within the European Community)

(2005/C 222/11)

----
EXHIBIT 32.1








Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Steel Partners Holdings L.P.(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren G. Lichtenstein, Chief Executive Officer of Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc., the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




Date:March 25, 2014/s/ Warren G. LichtensteinWarren G. LichtensteinExecutive Chairmanof Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc.





*  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Jekovan Vantrell LIGON v. STATE

CR-15-1102

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James P. LANIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2044

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 3, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Travis Lee KENDRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-559

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Daniel B. RESLIER, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and Holly Reslier, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-43

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
----

----

III Informações

Comissão

----

Publicação de uma vaga de

DIRECTOR

(Grau A*14)

(N.o 2 do artigo 29.o do Estatuto)

COM/2005/10003

(2005/C 218 A/01)

A Comissão pretende nomear um director para o Instituto de Saúde e Protecção do Consumidor, da Direcção‐Geral «Centro Comum de Investigação», em Ispra (Itália).

Para informações sobre a descrição de funções, critérios de selecção e candidatura, consultar:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

O candidato ao cargo de director será seleccionado e nomeado pela Comissão de acordo com os trâmites de selecção e de recrutamento em vigor. A remuneração e outras condições de emprego são as estabelecidas no Estatuto para os funcionários das Comunidades Europeias de grau A*14. A União Europeia aplica uma política de igualdade de oportunidades.

Condições exigidas: nacionalidade de um Estado‐Membro da União Europeia; diploma universitário que permita o acesso a estudos de doutoramento; experiência profissional mínima de 15 anos, adquirida após obtenção da licenciatura num nível veiculado pelo grau de habilitações acima referido, incluindo o mínimo de cinco anos num cargo superior de gestão; profundo conhecimento de uma língua oficial da União Europeia e bons conhecimentos de outra língua oficial.

Os candidatos interessados devem inscrever-se através da internet, no endereço seguinte:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html,

seguindo as instruções. Chama-se a atenção dos candidatos para a necessidade de disporem de um endereço electrónico que servirá para identificar a respectiva inscrição.

A data‐limite de inscrição é 6 de Outubro de 2005. As inscrições em linha serão encerradas às 12 horas, hora de Bruxelas.

----
Calvin Leon JONES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0467

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 10.10    $10,000.00 October 7, 2010  Promissory Note  As hereinafter agreed Grote Molen, Inc., jointly and severally, promises to pay to the order of John B. Hofman Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), and it is hereby agreed that the said amount ($10,000.00) shall be payable upon demand. Interest shall accrue at a rate of six percent (6%) per annum and will be charged on the unpaid balance until the whole amount of the principal and interest is paid. There shall be no penalty for early payment of this note.  Should default be made in the payment of the demand note then the whole unpaid amount shall become immediately due and payable; and in the event default is made and said note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or suit is brought on the same, then the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and attorney's fees that might be incurred. If there is a lawsuit, borrower agrees upon lender's request to submit to the jurisdiction of the county of Bannock County, the State of Idaho. This note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho.   UNDERSIGNED: Grote Molen, Inc.   By:/s/John B. Hofman John B. Hofman, President
Regulatory Evaluation Docket No. 

### FAA

# 20 I S""

- tUM- 

# o 2 

## Z - AJ) Directorate Identifier: -AD ((nm mak e clumKe s fo the ralues iiJ ilw tahle he/ow. you IIIIlS! <.?f/Slll't! 1/te totu/s update (l( ;cordingly . {I !h e y do 11 01. c li c k ror Tah J info multh e n ow 

### o f th e 

### clumP,ed (.;d/. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Repetitive 4.0 

### 174 

### Inspection ?

**1.\'i(~/ b-<X**  l = it '


# . '

l '

i >

" ' ' } <{

The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compi iance for U.S. fleet: $59 , 160 Costs covered under warranty (ifknmvu) $ On-Condition Costs: 

# 0 Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e . g., Inspection , (include access, (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing, and closeup)
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might nol be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

### Exec utive Order 12866 : Cou l d the AD be considered a "s ignifica nt regulatory



# act **"?~**

**,** YES* 

# D

**NO ~**  *Ex pl a nation: 

### DOT Regulatory Po li cies and Procedures: Is t he AD signifi cant? 

# G YES*0

**NO~** *Explanat ion: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Wi ll the AD hav e a s ign ificant economic impact o n a s u bstantial number of small e nti t ies? Ex plain for e ither a Y es or No an swer. - YESO

**NO~** Exp l anation: 

### Intra state Aviatio n in Alas ka : Thi s A D could affect intrastate aviation in Ala ska . Is it app ropriate to includ e s pecific r e quiremen ts for aircraft o perated in Ala s ka w her e aviation might be th e o nl y mode of t ran sportatio n?



# ~ YES*0

**NO~** *Ex pl a nati o n:
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daleco Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, I, Gary J. Novinskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 20, 2011
/s/ Gary J. NovinskieGary J. NovinskieChief Financial Officer
Christopher BAITY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-2747

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### PELTOLA v. WHITING.

No. 144.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 19, 1943.

*858Before L. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

David Muss, of New York City, for appellant.

Lorenz J. Brosnan and Robert J. Bell, both of New York City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This case presents only the question whether the judge was right in directing a verdict for the defendant. Feldman’s testimony was that if the abscess was merely peri-tonsillar, the defendant’s treatment was right; but that, if it had been preceded by “dental manipulation,” it was wrong. The only testimony in the case as to “dental manipulation” was that of the dentist, who said that the filling of the tooth had had nothing to do with the abscess. The jury was not indeed obliged to believe this, and there had undoubtedly been a previous history of “dental manipulation.” They might therefore have found from Feldman’s testimony that it was incautious or negligent for the defendant to proceed on the theory that the abscess was simply peri-tonsillar. But even if he was incautious or negligent, it would be immaterial if the abscess was in fact merely peri-tonsillar, because his treatment would then have been the proper treatment for the existing, though unknown, condition; although he would have been at fault, his fault would not have contributed to the result. The jury’s disbelief of the dentist that the “dental manipulation” did not cause the abscess, could not serve as a substitute for evidence that it did cause the abscess, and unless it did, the plaintiff had no cause of complaint. There was therefore a fatal hiatus in her proof.

But there is an even more fundamental reason why the judge was right. Even though the jury had been justified in assuming, not only that the treatment was careless, but that “dental manipulation” had in fact caused the abscess, and that the patient did not therefore get the treatment he should have had, there was no testimony whatever that the right treatment would have saved him. Feldman was extremely honest and guarded in what he said; the farthest he would go was that proper treatment “might” have stopped the spread of the infection, and that it might not. The infection may have been one of those malignant ones of which no treatment will stop. the spread. There was therefore, for both these reasons no testimony to support a verdict, and no verdict should have been taken.

Judgment affirmed.
Scott MEIDE, Nell Meide, Mike Meide III, and Jeff Meide, Petitioners, v. Belinda MITCHELL, Carol Hamner, Ramona Wilson, and Crystal Pool Service, LLC, Respondents.

CASE NO. 1D17-4419

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2017. Rehearing Denied December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 10 (dd)

Broadcast Agreement with CVMCommunications Group Limited.



[KARMA MEDIA]

Business with a Conscience"



Broadcast Agreement



This agreement is between CVMCommunications Group Limited (referred to as "broadcaster") located in Kingston, Jamaica, and Karma Media located in El Monte California,



Terms of Agreement:



Broadcaster agrees to air the 30-minute television program entitled Estelle's Paradise, owned and distributed by Karma Media.  Broadcasts will begin or before the week of December 6 2004 for a minimum of 26 consecutive weeks.  Either party may terminate this agreement for any reason with a 60-day advance written notice.  This agreement is automatically renewable unless either party desires to change all or part of the terms contained within this agreement.  Broadcaster agrees to air Estelle's Paradise a minimum of once per week between the hours of 6AM until midnight.  Providing the minimum requirement is fulfilled, the broadcaster is granted permission by Karma Media to air each episode on an unlimited basis.  The broadcaster will provide Karma Media with program grids in advance of broadcast dates



The broadcaster and Karma Media will split the commercial time 50/50 during each airing of Estelle's Paradise.  The commercial time is designated as 4 minutes to the broadcaster and 4 minutes for Karma Media.



Karma Media will deliver episodes of Estelle's Paradise in DVD format in a timely manner so that the broadcaster may have sufficient time to review each episode prior to the broadcast.  In the event an episode is determined to be unusable for broadcast, Karma Media will make every effort to provide a replacement or the broadcaster may elect to air a previous episode.



The broadcaster agrees to insert commercials per the direction of Karma Media and the broadcaster further agrees to provide Karma Media with affidavits or log sheets as validation that episodes and commercials have aired property.



The broadcaster acknowledges that it is strictly prohibited from re-selling, licensing or bartering Estelle's Paradise to any other broadcaster or individual not mentioned in this agreement.



By signing below both parties agree to the terms of this agreement and acknowledge that they are authorized to execute this agreement.



/s/ Wayne F. Smith

Date:

October 5, 204

Broadcaster



/s/ Dominique Einhorn

Date:

10/27/04

Karma Media



9660 Flair Drive, Suite 328 El Monte, CA 91731 · Tel. 310-397-1200 · Fax 310-398-2211
Kristi CASSADY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a Bank of New York, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00 384

- CR

Raymond ZAPATA

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR6345 Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Defendant pled guilty to aggravated robbery and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain. Defendant timely filed a general notice of appeal. The trial court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal states this “is a plea

- bargain case, and th e defendant has NO right of appeal.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain and a written waiver of appeal, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that defendant’s case is a plea bargain case and defendant does not have a right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not contain a written

motion ruled on before tr ial nor does it indicate the trial court granted defendant permission to appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d).

It is therefore ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal has been made part of the appellate record by August 14, 201 5

. See Daniels

v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification

issue.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
----

----

III Oznámení

Komise

----

Vyhlášení výběrového řízení na místo

VÝKONNÉHO ŘEDITELE

Evropského úřadu pro bezpečnost potravin (EÚBP)

(třída A*15)

(čl. 29 odst. 2 služebního řádu)

KOM/2005/10007

(2005/C 211 A/01)

Evropský úřad pro bezpečnost potravin hledá uchazeče o místo výkonného ředitele.

Uchazeči musí být občany některého ze členských států Evropské unie.

Výkonný ředitel bude jmenován správní radou úřadu ze seznamu kandidátů a navržen Evropskou komisí. Platové a pracovní podmínky odpovídají podmínkám stanoveným pro úředníky Evropských společenství třídy A*15 ve služebním řádu. Úřad a Komise uplatňují politiku rovných příležitostí.

Popis pracovní náplně, přihlášky a pokyny k podávání přihlášek je možné získat na těchto internetových adresách:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

nebo

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/efsa/index_en.htm.

Uzávěrka pro přijímání přihlášek je 5. října 2005 (podrobnosti najdete v pokynech k podávání přihlášek).

----