alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EF18-3-000]

Take notice that on December 1, 2017, Western Area Power Administration submitted tariff filing per: Formula Rates for the Loveland Area Projects—Rate Order No. WAPA-179 to be effective 1/1/2018.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 2, 2018.                

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-27903 Filed 12-26-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Nurys HERRERA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1146

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
| 1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Jinmimi Network, Inc. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        | Jinmimi Network Inc. |
|-------------|----------------------|
|        |                 |   |
| May 5, 2011 | By:                  | /s/ Jiangkun Shi |
|        |                 | Jiangkun Shi |
|        |                 | Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer |
|        |                 |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Beta Music Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

         3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: March 31, 2011
                                       By: /s/ Edwin Mendlinger
                                           --------------------
                                           Edwin Mendlinger
                                           Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 12.1

CareFusion Corporation

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



|                                         |  |                            |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |      |  |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  |  |   |     | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | --- | - | ---- | - | --- | ---- |  | - | ---- |  |  | ---- | --- | - | ---- | - | --- |  |  | - | --- | 
|                                         |  | Fiscal Year Ended June 30, |    
|(in millions)                            |  | 2011                       |     |   | 2010 |   |     | 2009 |  |   | 2008 |  |  | 2007 |     |   | 2006 |  
|Pretax Income from Continuing Operations |  | $                          | 415 |   |      | $ | 341 |      |  | $ | 337  |  |  | $    | 448 |   |      | $ | 179 |  |  | $ | 204 | 
|Fixed Charges (per below)                |  |                            | 109 |   |      |   | 135 |      |  |   | 96   |  |  |      | 102 |   |      |   | 84  |  |  |   | 76  | 
|Interest Capitalized                     |  |                            | (3  | ) |      |   | (2  | )    |  |   |     |  |  |      | (1  | ) |      |   |    |  |  |   |    | 
|                                         |  |                            |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |      |  |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  |  |   |     | 
|Earnings                                 |  | $                          | 521 |   |      | $ | 474 |      |  | $ | 433  |  |  | $    | 549 |   |      | $ | 263 |  |  | $ | 280 | 
|                                         |  |                            |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |      |  |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  |  |   |     | 
|Interest and Other Financial Charges     |  | $                          | 93  |   |      | $ | 118 |      |  | $ | 82   |  |  | $    | 90  |   |      | $ | 77  |  |  | $ | 70  | 
|Interest Portion of Rental Expense       |  |                            | 16  |   |      |   | 17  |      |  |   | 14   |  |  |      | 12  |   |      |   | 7   |  |  |   | 6   | 
|                                         |  |                            |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |      |  |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  |  |   |     | 
|Fixed Charges                            |  | $                          | 109 |   |      | $ | 135 |      |  | $ | 96   |  |  | $    | 102 |   |      | $ | 84  |  |  | $ | 76  | 
|                                         |  |                            |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |      |  |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  |  |   |     | 
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges       |  |                            | 4.8 |   |      |   | 3.5 |      |  |   | 4.5  |  |  |      | 5.4 |   |      |   | 3.1 |  |  |   | 3.7 | 
|                                         |  |                            |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |      |  |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  |  |   |     |
Luis E. REYES, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2485

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
Exhibit 32.2




CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.


Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)




In connection with the Annual Report of CTM Media Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for fiscal 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Leslie B. Rozner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: December 5, 2011


/s/ Leslie B. RoznerLeslie B. RoznerChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CTM Media Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by CTM Media Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Leonard David LANNI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4052

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Piero A. BUGONI, Appellant, v. Pam BONDI, Taylor O'Brien, Lindsay Turnbull, Sharon Bilu and John Megally, Appellees.

No. 4D16-4242

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 16, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6549

HOWARD FRANK NEAL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HELEN FAHEY, Virginia Parole Board - in her Individual and

Official Capacities; CAROL ANN SIEVERS, Vice Chairman - in her

Individual and Official Capacities; HERBERT V. COUTON, Board

Member - in his Individual and Official Capacities; DAVID N.

HARKER, Board Member - in his Individual and Official

Capacities; MICHAEL M. HAWES, Board Member - in his Individual

and Official Capacities; H. RANDOLPH POWELL, Warden, Brunswick

Correctional Center - in his Individual and Official Capacities,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00374-JRS)

Submitted: January 23, 2009 Decided: February 5, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Frank Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Howard Frank Neal seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Neal has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Leo TERMINELLO, DC# 480529, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case Nos. 2D17-747

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS QTR. SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
BALANCE SHEET  AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,250
<PP&E>                                         221,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,025
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14,271)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,583
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               237,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (237,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                (237,584)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (237,584)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)


</TABLE>
This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



As adopted pursuant to



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithtown Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 8, 2005, (the Report), I, Bradley E. Rock, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 5, 2005



/s/ Bradley E. RockBradley E. Rock, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Smithtown Bancorp
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         259,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,240,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,499,580
<PP&E>                                         170,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,603,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          713,765
<BONDS>                                        500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,663
<COMMON>                                        43,477
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,339,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,603,753
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               674,859
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  696,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,571
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Robert William HOUPT, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Primero
Mining Corp. (Primero) for the year ended December 31, 2017, and any
amendments thereto (the Form 20-F), I, Dave Laudrum, P.Geo., hereby consent to
the use of my name in connection with the references to and summaries of
scientific and technical information relating to Primeros mineral properties
(collectively, the Incorporated Information) and to the inclusion of the
Incorporated Information in the Annual Information Form filed as an exhibit to
the Form 20-F and incorporated by reference therein.

Yours very truly,/s/ Dave LaudrumDave Laudrum, P.Geo.Dated: April 20, 2018


---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1329 KA 13-00719**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAREEM HOWARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KAREN RUSSO-MCLAUGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered November 13, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal sale of a firearm in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and criminal sale of a firearm in the second degree (§ 265.12 [2]). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence. During the plea colloquy, Supreme Court advised him that he was waiving his right to appeal from the conviction only and failed to make any reference to the effect that the waiver would have on any challenge to the severity of his sentence ( see People v Maracle , 19 NY3d 925, 928; People v Peterson , 111 AD3d 1412, 1412). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

As the People correctly concede, the presentence report has not been redacted as the court ordered at sentencing, and therefore it must be redacted to correct the oversight ( see generally People v Abuhamra , 107 AD3d 1630, 1631-1632, lv denied 22 NY3d 1038).

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court