alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

NOTICE

On 15 June 2005, in Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A, the ‘Common catalogue of agricultural plant species — Fourth supplement to the 23rd complete edition’ will be published.

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/......). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex.

----
Exhibit 4.1

Liability Limitation Agreement

NKSJ Holdings, Inc (NKSJ Holdings) and its Outside Director (the Outside Director) (see *Note below) agree as
follows in accord with Paragraph 1 of Article 427 of the Companies Act and NKSJ Holdings articles of incorporation.

Section 1.
Limitation of Liability

If the Outside Director acts in good faith and is not grossly negligent in performing his/her duties,
the Company and the Outside Director agree that the Outside Directors liability under Paragraph 1 of Article 423 of the Companies Act (the Liability) is limited to the minimum liability amount specified in Paragraph 1 of Article
425 of the Companies Act.

Section 2. Procedure for Limitation of Liability

If any Liability arises from the Outside Directors performance his/her duties, the Company shall determine whether to limit the
Liability under the preceding Section 1 and promptly notify the Outside Director of the decision.

Section 3. Limitation of Benefits

If the Company decides to limit the Liability, it will not thereafter give to the Outside Director any property benefits
provided in Paragraph 4 of Article 425 of the Companies Act without obtaining the approval of the Companys shareholders at a shareholders meeting.

Section 4. Termination of Agreement

This agreement terminates if:



| | (1) | the Outside Director retires from office due to non-reappointment;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the Outside Director takes a position as executive director, officer, or manager or other employee of the Company or its subsidiaries; or
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | the Company and the Outside Director enter into a separate liability limitation agreement with each other.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 5. Consultation

Matters not provided for in this Agreement shall be determined through consultation between the Company and the Outside Director.

The parties are signing and sealing this Agreement in duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each of the parties.

April 1, 2010

NKSJ Holdings,
Inc.

26-1 Nishi-Shinjuku 1-chome, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo

By: /s/ Masatoshi Sato

Name: Masatoshi
Sato

Title: Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

*Note: The Company has entered into Liability Limitation Agreements with the Outside Directors listed below.

By: /s/ Akira Gemma, Tsunehisa Katsumata, Seiichi Asaka, Sumitaka Fujita, Yoshiharu Kawabata, George Olcott

Name: Akira Gemma, Tsunehisa Katsumata, Seiichi Asaka, Sumitaka Fujita, Yoshiharu Kawabata, George Olcott
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the Registration Statement on Form S-1 and the related Prospectus of EVCARCO, Inc. for the registration of 61,225,000 of the Company’s common shares and to the inclusion therein of our report dated April 15, 2011, with respect to the financial statements of EVCARCO, Inc. as of December 31, 2010, for the year ended December 31, 2010, and for the period from inception (October 14, 2008) to December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





/s/ Whitley Penn LLP





Dallas, Texas


April 15, 2011
James Patrick WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4222

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
James APPLETON and Katuy Tenorio, Appellants, v. RESIDENCES AT THE FALLS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D16-1245

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|   | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Bruce Goldstein                                                              |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  Bruce Goldstein                                                      |
| Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
Tavaris COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 18, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<PAGE>
           EXHIBIT 12 -  RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
OLD KENT FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<CAPTION>
                                        Nine Months Ended 
                                           September 30                       Years Ended December 31
                                                               (dollar amounts in thousands)
                                          1998      1997          1997       1996       1995       1994       1993
<S>                                    <C>       <C>           <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Earnings:
  Income before income taxes            $222,357  $208,192      $273,885   $238,722   $214,613   $205,702   $198,298
  Fixed charges                           94,610    70,196        99,490     70,477     70,682     38,646     22,137

                                        $316,967  $278,388      $373,375   $309,199   $285,295   $244,348   $220,435

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense
    (other than interest on deposits)   $ 94,580  $ 70,166      $ 99,449   $ 70,436   $ 70,641   $ 38,605   $ 22,096
  Interest factor in rent expense            --        --            --         --         --         --         --
  Other                                       30        30            41         41         41         41         41

                                        $ 94,610  $ 70,196      $ 99,490   $ 70,477   $ 70,682   $ 38,646   $ 22,137


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
  excluding interest on deposits            3.35      3.97          3.75       4.39       4.04       6.32       9.96


Including Interest On Deposits


Earnings:
  Income before income taxes            $222,357  $208,192      $273,885   $238,722   $214,613   $205,702   $198,298
  Fixed charges                          379,291   366,248       495,383    453,060    433,167    303,592    264,605

                                        $601,648  $574,440      $769,268   $691,782   $647,780   $509,294   $462,903

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                      $379,261  $366,218      $495,342   $453,019   $433,126   $303,551   $264,564
  Interest factor in rent expense            --        --            --         --         --         --         --
  Other                                       30        30            41         41         41         41         41

                                        $379,291  $366,248      $495,383   $453,060   $433,167   $303,592   $264,605
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
  including interest on deposits            1.59      1.57          1.55       1.53       1.50       1.68       1.75
</TABLE>

<PAGE>
The Corporation had no preferred stock outstanding during any period
presented.  Accordingly, its ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends is the same as its ratio of earnings to fixed
charges.
Mark Eugene PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1249

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 18, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ALL ELEMENTS INSURANCE RESTORATION a/a/o Michael and Tammy McFarlane, Appellant, v. FIRST PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a Frontline Homeowners Insurance, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2294

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 4, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| ·   | our      auditors' report dated March 9, 2010 on the consolidated balance sheets of      Ballard Power Systems Inc. (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2009 and      2008, and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive      income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years      in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009,  and |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | our      Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 9,      2010 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as      of December 31, 2009, |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
MOSS & ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellant, v. TAUB ENTITIES-ST. PETE, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5293

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 13.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to


Title
18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, Yue
Kou, Chief Financial Officer of Dragon Jade International Limited (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




The
annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)); and




The
information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  January
7, 2010










Yue Kou,
Chief Financial Officer
In the INTEREST OF: K.K.F.,

No. ED 106927

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: July 30, 2019

FOR APPELLANT, Christopher M. Braeske, 8008 Carondelet Ave., Clayton, MO 63105.

For Juvenile Officer, Respondent, Siobhan K. Akers, 105 South Central Ave., Clayton, MO 63105, Richard J. Childress, 111 North 7th Street, Suite 329, St. Louis, MO 63101.

Attorney for Natural Mother, Laura E. Sidel, 4542 West Pine Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63108.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

F.J.F. ("Father") appeals from the judgment of the family court terminating his parental rights to his minor child, K.K.F. ("Child"), born in December of 2012. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Sergio CAMPANIONI and Yamilet Campanioni, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2241

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 406-407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to

[[Page 407]]

the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification 
Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 3, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 405 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-100, 
CP2018-142.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-28362 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with this Annual Report of  Kensington Leasing, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Angelique de Maison, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 15, 2010

/s/ Angelique de MaisonChief Executive Officer and Director
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 27, 2016

No. 04-16-00679-CV

John M. DONOHUE,

Appellant

v.

SAN ANTONIO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014ci12457

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant, who is pro se on appeal, has filed a motion asking the court to appoint counsel 

for purposes of appeal. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution grants an 

indigent criminal defendant the right to counsel, but does this right does not generally apply in

civil cases. Mustapha v. HSBC Bank USA Nat’l Ass’n, No. 14-11-00112-CV, 2012 WL 273897, 

at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 31, 2012, pet. denied) (citing Turner v. Rogers, 564 

U.S. 431, 441–42 (2011)). With rare exceptions, a party is not entitled to court-appointed 

counsel in a civil case. Id. (citing Gibson v. Tolbert, 102 S.W.3d 710, 712 (Tex. 2003)). Texas 

has statutorily provided for appointed counsel in juvenile delinquency cases, in parental 

termination cases, and in cases in which application for court-ordered mental health services has 

been made. Id. (citing TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 51.10; id. §107.013; TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY 

CODE ANN. § 574.003). A trial court has discretion to appoint counsel to an indigent civil 

litigant, “in some exceptional cases” in which “the public and private interests at stake are such 

that the administration of justice may best be served by appointing a lawyer to represent an 

indigent civil litigant.” Id. (quoting Travelers Indem. Co. v. Mayfield, 923 S.W.2d 590, 594 

(Tex.1996)). We conclude that this case does not present exceptional circumstances warranting 

appointment of counsel, and therefore DENY appellants’ motion.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of October, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I, David W. Gryska, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Myrexis, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 29, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ DAVID W. GRYSKA                                                                                   
|                        |  |  |  | David W. Gryska                                                                                       
|                        |  |  |  | Acting President and Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Operating Officer (principal executive officer)
FERRELLGAS, L.P., LLP, Appellant, v. Joseph Anthony SIEBERT, Ferrellgas, Inc. and Robert Wayne Doby, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-640

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Carlton Parfitt, Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Energy Corporation, a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 14,2006



/s/ Carlton Parfitt

-------------------

Carlton Parfitt



Director and Chief Financial Officer
SI 0-10031 1-003 

Illinois Manufacturers' Association wwv^^.ima-lHM.<)rg 

IJ l I Uosl JJnd Slr"vl • kiile h20 • (>ak Broi.k, Illinois hO',2 i • 6M)- SdHoniO • hixr d ».l-J 1 H.7467 

220 \.\-{ Adams Slrofi • Simnj^ii'ld, Illinois ()2;oi • 21 7-",J2-l_>-tt) • P<ix; J l7-')22-J.!67 

Linnil: im.ic'inici-nt't.org 

March 4, 2010 

Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Docket DOT-OST 2010-0034 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of the Illinois Manufacturers' Association and our thousands of member companies located 

across the state, I would like to express our strong support of the application for antitrust immunity 

and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed 

alliance between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld Alliance to compete effectively with the Star 

and Sky Team Alliances. Increasing competition will enhance the benefits of the Department of 

Transportation's Open Sl<ies policy - first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies and then by serving as a 

foundation for further liberalization across Asia, 

Illinois is home to a number of global companies like Caterpillar, Deere & Company, and Archer Daniels 

Midland that rely on an open and competitive marketplace. The oneworld Alliance will have a positive 

impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options, and other 

benefits created by strong competition among three competitive air alliances. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this AA/JAL 

application as it would enable these oneworld Alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly 

competitive air transportation services. The U.S. DOT can help ensure that airlines have every 

opportunity to stay competitive in both a challenging economy and increasingly global market by 

approving this application. 

Thank you for your hard work in achieving the U.S.-Japan Open Skies agreement and I look forward to 

your quick approval of this pending application. 

Sincerely, 

Gregory VV, Baise 

President & CEO 

5cn'/fi|,' Illinois iminut.n turers aince IH').i
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. PEQUANOC RUBBER CO., Respondent. SOFT RUBBER WORKERS, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

Nos. 8182, 8190.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 5, 1943.

Decided Jan. 11, 1943.

Robert H. Kleeb, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David Findling, and Thomas B. Sweeney, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the Board.

King & Vogt, of Morristown, N. J., for Pequanoc Rubber Co.

John F. Dumont, of Little Falls, N. J., for Soft Rubber Workers.

Before BIGGS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Labor Board will be enforced. The petition of Soft Rubber Workers, Inc., may be withdrawn in accordance with the stipulation dated December 21, 1942.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of EcoLiveGreen, Corp., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Len Bryan, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 22, 2012  /s/ Len Bryan Len Bryan President, Principal Executive Officer