alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

I Informácie

Komisia

----

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

18. augusta 2005

(2005/C 203/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

----

----

Nevznesenie námietky voči oznámenej koncentrácii

(Prípad COMP/M.3870 — Carlyle/Otor)

(2005/C 203/02)

(Text s významom pre EHP)

Dňa 9. augusta 2005 sa Komisia rozhodla neoponovať voči vyššie spomínanej oznámenej koncentrácii a vyhlásiť ju za kompatibilnú so spoločným trhom. Toto rozhodnutie je založené na článku 6 odsek 1 písmeno b) nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 139/2004. Úplný text rozhodnutia je dostupný iba vo francúzštine a bude dostupný verejnosti po tom, ako budú odstránené akékoľvek obchodné tajomstvá, ktoré by mohol obsahovať. Prístupný bude na:

----

----

Nevznesenie námietky voči oznámenej koncentrácii

(Prípad COMP/M.3822 — Stora Enso/Schneidersöhne Papier)

(2005/C 203/03)

(Text s významom pre EHP)

Dňa 25. júla 2005 sa Komisia rozhodla neoponovať voči vyššie spomínanej oznámenej koncentrácii a vyhlásiť ju za kompatibilnú so spoločným trhom. Toto rozhodnutie je založené na článku 6 odsek 1 písmeno b) nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 139/2004. Úplný text rozhodnutia je dostupný iba v angličtine a bude dostupný verejnosti po tom, ako budú odstránené akékoľvek obchodné tajomstvá, ktoré by mohol obsahovať. Prístupný bude na:

----

----

Nevznesenie námietky voči oznámenej koncentrácii

(Prípad COMP/M.3858 — Lehman Brothers/SCG/Starwood/Le Meridien)

(2005/C 203/04)

(Text s významom pre EHP)

Dňa 20. júla 2005 sa Komisia rozhodla neoponovať voči vyššie spomínanej oznámenej koncentrácii a vyhlásiť ju za kompatibilnú so spoločným trhom. Toto rozhodnutie je založené na článku 6 odsek 1 písmeno b) nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 139/2004. Úplný text rozhodnutia je dostupný iba v angličtine a bude dostupný verejnosti po tom, ako budú odstránené akékoľvek obchodné tajomstvá, ktoré by mohol obsahovať. Prístupný bude na:

----
David Scott GAFFORD v. STATE

CR-15-0999

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 21, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the quarterly report of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended July 3, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Lawrence J. Spanley, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Vice PresidentFinance,
Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
March 21, 2005
    
    /s/
    
    Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.Chief Financial Officer, Vice President -Finance, Treasurer and SecretaryBakers Footwear Group, Inc.
 A signed original of this written statement or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bakers Footwear
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
---

CONSENT

March 31, 2014

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Primero Mining Corp. (the
      "Company") | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                 | 
|    | Consent of Expert                          | 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys annual
report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 to be filed by the
Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any
amendments thereto (the "Annual Report"). The Annual Report incorporates
by reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2013 (the AIF).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in the Annual Report
with reference to my involvement in the review and approval of the scientific
and technical information contained in the following sections of the AIF:

- Mineral Activities  Black Fox Complex.

Sincerely,

|/s/ Howard Bird | 
|--------------- | 
|Howard Bird     | 

---
* This Order and Judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept

under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicat a, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order andjudgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of Tenth Ci r. R. 36.3. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/12/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

______ SHEILA STEIN, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. 95-6140 ) (D.C. No. CIV-94-1264-A) BROKEN ARROW POLICE; MIKE MARTIN, ) (W. Dist. ofOkla.) Seargent; PENNY KUMROW; STEVE ) KUMROW; LELA WALDEN; KEN WALDEN; ) JIMMY COGHILL; SHARON PEARSON, ) ) Defendants-Appellees. )

______ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

______ Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

______ After examining the briefs and the appellate record , this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is t herefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Sheila Stein, appearing pro se and informapauperis , appeals from the district court’s Order dismissing her complaint-2-

with prejudice to its refiling. Stein filed her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint on Augus t 9, 1994, alleging that the defendants violated her con stitutional rights under the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Ame ndments to the United States Constitution when, while plaintiff wa s visiting at the home of defendants Steve and Penny Kumrow in Ok lahoma City, Oklahoma, on or about February 6, 1994, those defen dants, together with the other defendants, forced the plai ntiff to enter a psychiatric hospital and/or an institution conduc ting drug/alcohol programs. Plaintiff alleged that the defendants acted knowingly, maliciously, and intentionally. S he prayed that the court award her compensatory and punitive damag es of $55,000,000 “and their life by firing squad after h aving spent one year and one day consecutively in prison.” On appeal, Stein contends that her right under the constitutional amendments pleaded were violated. Sh e asks for return of her money, property and children, allegin g that she was kidnaped. She wants the defendants “behind bars.” A finding that a complaint is frivolous is a decisi on entrusted to the discretion of the trial court, whi ch we review for an abuse of discretion. Green v. Seymour , 59 F.3d 1073, 1077 (10th Cir. 1995). An abuse of discretion has been defined as an “arbitrary, capricious, whimsical, or manifestly un reasonable judgment.” FDIC v. Oldenburg , 34 F.3d 1529, 1555 (10th Cir.1994).

Here, Stein has not even stated an arguable claim f or relief. There has been no abuse of discretion by t he district
court. We affirm for substantially the reasons set forth i n the district court’s Order of August 29,1994. The mand ate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court:

James E. Barrett, Senior United States Circuit Judge
Timothy EDWARDS, Appellant, v. Julie JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-970

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
Innocent O. CHINWEZE, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D17-378

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Amy Clemons PLUMMER v. James Jeffrey PLUMMER

2016-CT-00409-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: October 27, 2017 Closed: February 1, 2018

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
**Exhibit 99.9**

 

**CONSENT OF****DONALD J. BIRAK**

 

In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 40-F (the “Form 40-F”) of Franco-Nevada Corporation with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, I consent to the references to my name, including under the heading “Experts,” and to the use of the technical report entitled “Palmarejo Project SW Chihuahua State, Mexico YE 2012 — Technical Report,” dated January 1, 2013 (the “Report”), and the information derived from the Report, included in the 2013 Annual Information Form of Franco-Nevada Corporation dated March 19, 2014 (the “AIF”), which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated by reference in, the Form 40-F.

 

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-190109), on Form S-8 (No. 333-176856) and on Form F-10 (No. 333-191835) of the references to my name in the AIF and the use of the Report and the information derived therefrom.

 

 
| DATED:   March 19, 2014 |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| (signed)   Donald J. Birak   |   |
| Name:   Donald J. Birak      |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                      SURGE COMPONENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                    Nine Months Ended                    Three Months Ended
                                                                         August 31,                         August 31,
                                                                  1998              1997                1998              1997
                                                                 ------            ------              ------            ------

<S>                                                            <C>               <C>                 <C>             <C>         
Basic earnings:
    Net income (loss)                                          $(225,361)        $    32,060         $ (100,992)     $     30,721

Shares:
    Weighted common shares outstanding                         4,831,480           4,823,958          4,839,067         4,823,958
    Employee's stock options                                          --                  --                 --                --
                                                              ----------         -----------        -----------       -----------

Total weighted shares outstanding                              4,831,480           4,823,958          4,839,067         4,823,958
                                                              ----------         -----------        -----------       -----------

Basic earnings per common share                               $     (.05)        $       .01        $      (.02)      $       .01
                                                              ==========         ===========        ===========       ===========

Diluted earnings:

    Net income (loss)                                         $ (225,361)        $    32,060        $ (100,992)     $      30,721

Shares:
    Weighted common shares outstanding                         4,831,480           4,823,958          4,839,067         4,823,958
    Employee stock options                                            --             105,532                 --           105,532
                                                              ----------         -----------        -----------       -----------

Total weighted shares outstanding                              4,831,480           4,929,490          4,839,067         4,929,490
                                                              ----------         -----------        -----------       -----------

Diluted earnings per common share                             $     (.05)        $       .01        $      (.02)      $       .01
                                                              ==========         ===========        ===========       ===========

</TABLE>


                                       15
Irving BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-895

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 14, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 23.1



SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs
PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS
WWW.SEALEBEERS.COM




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use, in the  statement on Form 10K of Firefish,  Inc.,  of our
report  dated  October  5,  2010 on our  audit of the  financial  statements  of
Firefish,  Inc. as of March 31, 2010, and the related  statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended March 31, 2010, and
the reference to us under the caption "Experts."





/s/ Seale and Beers, CPAs

Seale and Beers, CPAs
Las Vegas, Nevada
December 3, 2010













             SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS
                 50 S. Jones Blvd. Suite 202 Las Vegas, NV 89107
                    Phone: (888) 727-8251 Fax: (888) 782-2351
Rodney BURCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2808

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 16, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Emmanuel Joseph DORELUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-294

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

      ( print page 2620)    
                    By Notice dated September 18, 2008, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 26, 2008, (73 FR 55869), Mallinckrodt Inc., 3600 North Second Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63147, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Oripavine (9330), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                

The company plans to use the above listed controlled substance as an intermediate in the manufacture of a non-controlled product.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Mallinckrodt Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Mallinckrodt Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

Dated: January 9, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9-730 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EX PARTE Rickey RANKIN

CR-16-0160

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Billy MULKEY and Rochelle Mulkey (Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, Shelly Mulkey), Skylar Mulkey and Justin Mulkey v. Burnell ALESSI, Sr., GEICO Casualty Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm General Insurance Company, Aaron Alessi, Jared Alessi, ABC Insurance Company and Def Insurance Company

No. 2017-CC-2161

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons:

*565I would deny this writ application on the showing made.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 1035)    
                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 2, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *Independent Bank Corporation, Grand Rapids, Michigan;*                     to merge with TCSB Bancorp, Inc., Traverse City, Michigan, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Traverse City State Bank, Traverse City, Michigan.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 3, 2018.

Ann E. Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-00147 Filed 1-8-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Marie G. VITAL and Gertrude B. Vital, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SUMMERTREE VILLAGE AT THE CALIFORNIA CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2694

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Remanded.
STATE EX REL. Corei K. GUIDRY a/k/a Corey Guidry v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-1777

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Denied.
Edward James GRAZIANO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Carol DYER, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1469

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of REMARK ACQUISITIONS I INC. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence Rothberg,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






/s/
Lawrence Rothberg





Lawrence
Rothberg


Lawrence
Rothberg, President and Director


(Principal
Executive and Financial Officer)


April 15,
2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.