alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 3, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 409 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-104, CP2018-146.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-28366 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1

MEMORANDUM

Date: July 30, 2012

Subject: EPA

– EMI

– Felman Corporation Teleconference Summary ( July 6 , 2012)

From: Beth Friedman, EC/R Incorporated

To: Conrad Chin, OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243

- 02)

I. Introduction:

A conference call was held on July 6 , 201 2 to discuss the comments and analysis submitted

by Eramet Marietta (EMI) to EPA on July 2, 2012

. The submittal consisted of a cover letter ;

a report and supporting appendices, “Technical Comments to Alternative Approach to

NESHAP Subpart XXX Compliance

- -- November 23, 2011 Proposed Rule,” prepared by

QSEM Solutions, Inc. and a copy of a September 2010 test report. They also submitted a CD

containing modeling files that were prepared to assess the impacts of the proposed changes to

baseline and controlled emissions. The plants also submitted a summary presentation

. Th e

purpose of the call was to ensure that EPA clearly understands the proposal so that the

upcoming July 16, 2012 meeting between the industry and EPA is as productive as possible

.

II. Participant s:

Eramet Marietta : Jeff McKinney

Felman Production, Inc. : John Konrady, Shawn McCutchan

Environ: Russell Kemp

Beveridge & Diamond : Amy Lincoln

Jones Day : John Rego

Policy Navigation Group : Troy Hillier

EPA/ OAQPS : Conrad Chin, C huck French, Stef Johnson, Darcie Smith

EC/R Incorporated (Contractor for EPA) : Beth Friedman

Attachments:

Letter and attachments to Conrad Chin and Chuck French, EPA from John Rego, Jones Day.

July 2, 2012. Evaluation of a Fugitive Emissions Control Strategy and Proposal to Add ress Data

Deficiencies.

Presentation to EPA. July 6, 2012. Overview of Eramet Marietta Inc. NESHAP Re

- Analysis

Submittal.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 61281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-472-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization; States Edge 
Wind I Holding LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
States Edge Wind I Holding LLC`s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is January 9, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#682e2d3a2b27060401060d3b1d1818071a1c280e0d1a0b460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f191a0d1c10313336313a0c2a2f2f302d2b1f393a2d3c71383029">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 20, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-27907 Filed 12-26-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 12 May 2005

in Case C-287/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

(Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom to provide services - Customer loyalty programmes - Burden of proof)

(2005/C 205/03)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-287/03, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Patakia and N.B. Rasmussen) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agents: E. Dominkovits, assisted by E. Balate, avocat) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 3 July 2003 — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 12 May 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 200 of 23.08.2003.

----
Michael RENDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5125

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 27, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Steven BEEBE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D16-292 2D16-486 2D16-491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Demetrice JOHNSON

No. 2016-KP-2232

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted. The ruling of the court of appeal ordering an evidentiary hearing to address defendant's entitlement to an out-of-time appeal is reversed, and the district court's ruling denying the application for post-conviction relief is reinstated. Defendant pled guilty pursuant to a negotiated agreement, was sentenced in conformity therewith, and was informed at the time of his plea that he was waiving his right to appeal. Therefore, he has not shown that he is entitled to an out-of-time appeal. *See**State v. Counterman* , 475 So.2d 336 (La. 1985).

WEIMER, J., dissenting

I would request an opposition from the defendant prior to issuing a ruling.

Hughes, J., would request an opposition from the defendant prior to issuing a ruling.
The model code and executables, as well as the AERSCREEN User’s Guide and test cases, for the latest

version of AERSCREEN and MAKEMET ( both version 15181 ) are available at the following URL:

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/11thmodconf.htm #aerscreen
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 13367 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:07

- cr
- 00015

- LJA

- CHW

- 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus

EDDIE MAE CLEMONS,
Defendant

- Appellant.

____ ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________ ( February 23, 2017 )
Before MARCUS , MARTIN and FAY , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-13367 Date Filed: 02/23/2017 Page: 1 of 22 John Philip Fox, appointed counsel for Eddie Clemons , has moved to

w ithdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel ’ s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel ’ s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and
Clemons’s revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 16-13367 Date Filed: 02/23/2017 Page: 2 of 2
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 21 July 2005

in Case C-515/03: (Reference for a preliminary ruling, Finanzgericht Hamburg) in Eichsfelder Schlachtbetrieb GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (1)

(Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Export refunds - Conditions for granting them - Import of the product into the non-member country of destination - Meaning - Customs formalities for release for consumption in the non-member country - Substantial processing or working - Reimportation into the Community - Abuse of law)

(2005/C 217/28)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-515/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany), made by decision of 12 November 2003, received at the Court on 9 December 2003, in the proceedings between Eichsfelder Schlachtbetrieb GmbH and Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), S. von Bahr, J. Malenovský and U. Lõhmus, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 21 July 2005, in which it ruled:

The condition for obtaining a differentiated export refund laid down in Article 17(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1384/95 of 19 June 1995, as regards in particular the adjustments necessary for the implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, namely clearance through customs for release of the product concerned for consumption in the non-member country of destination, is fulfilled where that product, on which import duties were paid in that country, undergoes substantial processing or working there within the meaning of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, even if the product deriving from such processing or working is then re-exported to the Community, with reimbursement of the duties levied in that country and payment of customs import duties in the Community.

In those circumstances, reimbursement of the export refund may nevertheless be required if the national court considers that evidence of an abusive practice on the part of the exporter has been produced, in accordance with the rules of national law.

----

(1)OJ C 59 of 06.03.2004.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
December 31, 1999 10-Q Balance Sheets, Income Statements, and Cash Flow
Statements, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
 </LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                   77570000
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              827000
<ALLOWANCES>                                15000
<INVENTORY>                               3896000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         13102000
<PP&E>                                   13012000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           26118000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      849000
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    14000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                               24618000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             26118000
<SALES>                                   9509000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          9509000
<CGS>                                     6002000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             7260000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           2513000
<INCOME-TAX>                               955000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1558000
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              1558000
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .11


</TABLE>
Vicente CORDOBA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
M. Lynn POPE f/k/a M. Lynn Bikowitz, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Paul W. BIKOWITZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0858

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.

Denied.
Florentino LABANINO-CAMEJO, and F & J Transport Corp., Appellants, v. Isabel GONZALEZ, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1136

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Schlotterbeck, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of CareFusion Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                          |  |  |  |                            |  | 
|------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: September 15, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ David L. Schlotterbeck |  | 
|                          |  |  |  | David L. Schlotterbeck     |  | 
|                          |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer    |  |
Alfred HOLMES-ROLLE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O Megan BROOKS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2741

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 09-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the
accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:  Curtis W. MewbourneDate:    March 31, 2011
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection with the Quarterly report of Broadleaf  Capital
Partners, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September  30,  2002,  as  filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We, Robert A. Braner,
acting  in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer, and  Donald
E.  Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the
best  of  our  knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert A. Braner
---------------------------
     Robert A. Braner
     Chief Executive Officer
     November 19, 2002


/s/ Donald E. Johnson
---------------------------
     Donald E. Johnson
     Chief Financial Officer
     November 19, 2002