alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Royalty Agreement



 Exhibit 10.224 
 VALENS OFFSHORE SPV II, CORP. 
 c/o Valens Capital Management, LLC 
 335 Madison Avenue 
 New York, New
York 10017 
 December 10, 2007 
 Biovest International, Inc. 
 377 Plantation Street Worcester, MA 01605 
 Attention: Chief Financial Officer 
 Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made to the Royalty Agreement dated as of December 10, 2007 (the “Royalty
Agreement”), by and between Biovest International, Inc. (the “Company”) and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp. (“Valens Offshore”). Capitalized terms used herein that are not defined shall have the meaning given
to them in the Royalty Agreement. 
 Valens Offshore and the Company desire to amend the royalty percentage set forth in the
Royalty Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth below. 
 In consideration of Valens Offshore’s agreement to
continue to provide financial accommodations to the Company and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree that: Section 4.1 of the Royalty Agreement
is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “two and twelve one hundredths (2.12%) percent” with the phrase “two and ninety-six one-hundredths percent (2.96%)” in the first sentence thereof. 
 Except as specifically amended herein, the Royalty Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and is hereby ratified and confirmed.
The execution, delivery and effectiveness of this letter agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of Valens Offshore, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Royalty Agreement. 
 This letter agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns
and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 
  
 [Remainder of the page intentionally blank.] 







 This letter agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Any signature delivered by a party by facsimile or electronic transmission shall be deemed to be an original signature
hereto. 
  

			
	 VALENS OFFSHORE SPV II, CORP.

		
	 By:
	 	 Valens Capital Management, LLC, its
investment manager

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Patrick Regan

		 	 Name: Patrick Regan
 Title: Authorized Signatory



  

			
	 CONSENTED AND AGREED TO:

	
	 BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Steven Arikian

		 	 Name: Steven Arikian, M.D.
 Title: Chairman & CEO
Marshall PERFECT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D15-4065

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyTreasurer and Principal Accounting OfficerDate:  November 22, 2004This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Banc of America Funding Corporation
  Mortgage Certificate-Backed Certificates,
  Series 2009-R1

  I, Scott Evans, a Senior Vice President of Banc of America Funding
  Corporation (the "Depositor"), certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Banc of America Funding 2009-R1 Trust (the "Exchange
    Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
    noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank
    National Association as Custodian for Banc of America Funding 2006-D Trust,
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator for
    Banc of America Funding 2006-D Trust and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 26, 2010


    /s/ Scott Evans
    Signature

    Senior Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Zemond LIGHTFOOT v. Tim KEITH, Warden Winn Correctional Center, Winnfield, Louisiana

No. 2016-KP-1389

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's guilty plea waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction. *State v. Crosby* , 338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976). Relator also fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a *564second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Leah Giannotti MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0712

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Anthony Previte, Chief Executive Officer of FriendFinder Networks Inc. (the "registrant"), certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012 of the registrant; and





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








FriendFinder Networks Inc.By:
/s/ Anthony PreviteName: Anthony PreviteTitle:  Chief Executive Officer





Date: April 30, 2013
Christopher COLBERT v. STATE

CR-15-1024

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 21, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9036-9]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 12/25/2017 Through 12/29/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice:

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search

EIS No. 20170249, Draft, OSM, MT, Western Energy Company's Rosebud Mine 
Area F, Comment Period Ends: 02/20/2018, Contact: Logan Sholar, OSMRE 
Project Coordinator (303) 293-5036.

    Dated: January 2, 2018.
Kelly Knight,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2018-00019 Filed 1-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., and Sedgwick Cms, Appellants, v. Judy MOCHANSKI, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0637

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Mark E. LAPOINTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Devonda BAILEY, Appellant, v. Anheuser BUSCH and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D17-1226

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00154-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. S-14605

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

$1,709.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Derek Phillips attempts to appeal the default judgment against his 

interest in $1,709.00 in U.S. Currency. The State of Texas filed a notice of seizure and 

intended forfeiture of the money on June 30, 2020. Phillips was served with the notice 

on July 14, 2020. On August 11, 2020, the trial court found that Phillips had failed to 

answer or appear and entered a default judgment ordering the forfeiture of the 

money. No postjudgment motions were filed to extend the appellate deadline, so 

Phillip’s notice of appeal was due September 10, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.

Phillips did not file his notice of appeal until May 5, 2023.

By letter dated May 9, 2023, we notified Phillips of our concern that we may not 

have jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See id.; 

see also In re D.A., No. 02-15-00346-CV, 2015 WL 9244637, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

Dec. 17, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional 

in this court, and absent a timely[ ]filed notice of appeal or extension request, we must 

dismiss the appeal.”). We warned him that this appeal could be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by 

May 19, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. We received no response.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 29, 2023
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory E. A. Morrison, President and Chief Executive Officer of Platinum
Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and
belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings,
Ltd.

Date: May 7, 2004                     /s/ Gregory E. A. Morrison
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      By: Gregory E. A. Morrison
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1705
SHERRIE F. BRINKLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DILLARD’S, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-00059-RGD) Submitted: August 23, 2006 Decided: September 27, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harris D. Butler, III, Tim Schulte, Rebecca H. Royals, BUTLER, WILLIAMS & SKILLING, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Rodney Allen Satterwhite, Jennifer Magoulas Campbell, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Sherrie F. Brinkley seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Dillard’s motion to compel arbitration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Brinkley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We note that our dismissal of the appeal as interlocutory operates as a dismissal without prejudice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 721 

Expressing support for the designation of September 2023 as ‘‘Peace Month’’ 

and calling on Congress to take action to promote peace. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 2023 

as ‘‘Peace Month’’ and calling on Congress to take action 

to promote peace. 

Whereas the United Nations designated September 21 

‘‘International Day of Peace’’—otherwise known as Peace 

Day; 

Whereas the United Nations General Assembly declared 

Peace Day as a day devoted to ‘‘commemorating and 

strengthening the ideals of peace, both within and among 

all nations and peoples’’; 

Whereas all United Nations member states, organizations, regional and nongovernmental organizations, and individuals are encouraged to celebrate and recognize global 

peace efforts on Peace Day; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 721 IH 

Whereas Peace Day represents shared hopes of an end to 

conflict in all forms; 

Whereas the United Nations calls for a 24-hour global cease 

fire on Peace Day; 

Whereas this year’s Peace Day theme is ‘‘Actions for Peace: 

Our Ambition for the #Global Goals’’; 

Whereas 2018 marked the 70th anniversary of the Universal 

Declaration of Human Rights, a milestone development 

in contemporary human history promoting peace and 

well-being worldwide; 

Whereas violent conflicts could cost upwards of $14.4 trillion 

per year globally; 

Whereas global peace promotion efforts improve the lives of 

Americans and all peoples; 

Whereas the United States has a long history of promoting 

peace and human rights at home and abroad; and 

Whereas September would be an appropriate month to designate as Peace Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Peace Month’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) calls on Congress to promote peace, both at 

5 home and abroad. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

# AGENCY:

Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled.

# ACTION:

Proposed Deletions from the Procurement List.

# SUMMARY:

The Committee is proposing to delete products from the Procurement List that were previously furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before February 4, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia, 22202-4149.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information or to submit comments contact: Amy B. Jensen, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email                         *CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.

## Deletions

The following products are proposed for deletion from the Procurement List:

### Products

*NSN—Product Name:*

3920-00-000-8908—Shelf Assembly, Top

*Mandatory Source of Supply:*                         Rauch, Inc., New Albany, IN                    

*Contracting Activity:*                         USPS, Topeka Purchasing Center                    

                        NSN(s)—Product Name(s):                              ( print page 673)    

8455-00-NSH-0001—Logo, BDU Coat and Shirt

8455-00-NSH-0002—Logo, BDU Coat and Shirt

*Mandatory Source of Supply:*                         Southeastern Kentucky Rehabilitation Industries, Inc., Corbin, KY                    

*Contracting Activity:*                         Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support                    

Amy B. Jensen,

Director, Business Operations.

[FR Doc. 2018-00010 Filed 1-4-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual Report on Form 10-K of Bakken Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Deffinbaugh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 17, 2013  /s/ David Deffinbaugh Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.