alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Martin Ervind WELCH v. STATE

CR-15-0818

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>



<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>            SEP-30-2000

<CASH>                             418,268
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                       56,350
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   474,618
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     474,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           74,597,435
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                    (113,665,255)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       474,618
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   395,480
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   128,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               2,964,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  3,053,048
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              3,053,048
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     3,053,048
<EPS-BASIC>                        2,878
<EPS-DILUTED>                        2,878



</TABLE>
----

SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2006

(2005/C 194/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

The abovementioned dates also apply to Luxembourg, except that Friday 21 July is replaced by Friday 23 June, Luxembourg National Holiday.

Work will resume as normal on Wednesday 3 January 2007.

Without prejudice to the schedule of public holidays for 2007, Tuesday 2 January 2007 will be a holiday.

The Commission reserves the right to modify the decisions, should the needs of service so require.

----
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Richard Smitten, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Stock Market
Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ RICHARD SMITTEN
---------------------------
Richard Smitten
CEO and CFO

November 19, 2004
T.G. v. STATE

CR-15-0876

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016 Reh. denied November 10, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2010 - 0546 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM215AD

AMM MM - 120/1459, R25 --- 9/28/09 AMM MM - 120/1459, R26 --- 3/29/10 AMM 28 -41 - 04 --- 9/28/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Winnifred JAMES, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY and Buenaventura Lakes Community Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-818

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jorge Roberto PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2170

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Arie Carnett BIZZLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1976

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. 

# DATES:

October 1-2, 2009. 

# Time:

 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The Langham Hotel, 250 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820. 

      ( print page 14158)    
Dated: March 24, 2009. 

John K. Rabiej, 

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. E9-6975 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
Dino HYLTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O Leslie BURTS, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0177

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
December 21, 2010

Luis Alberto Valencia Quality Director

Avianca

Avenida El dorado #106-74 Hangar 2 Piso 2 Bogotá

Colombia

Dear Mr. Valencia:

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it.

We Have the Petition

We’ve received your November 23, 2010, petition on behalf of Aerovias del Continente Americano, Avianca Airlines (Avianca) for an exemption to part 121, Appendix M (item 18) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow Avianca to operate its Airbus A320-214 aircra ft (MSN 4567) without meeting the flight control parameter rates required by the regulation.

We’ve added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2010-1195) and we are processing it. We will contact you if we need additional information.

How We’ll Process the Petition

A petition for an exem ption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 14 CFR 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it.2

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-4059.

Sincerely,

/s/

Frances Shaver Program Analyst Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
REOISCOV f R 

CAYCE 

a new kind ofci ^ 

CITY OF CAYCE 

M.uo/i 

ELISE ?.\K1\\ 

MAyo/i Pao-rni 

JAMES E. [ESKINS 

COLWai M£M3£fiS 

KENNETH D. )L.\IFER 

RICHARD N. MYERS 

STEVE ISOM 

Or.M^.\'.)i:£fi Assjsr.\.\T On'M-WAC'EN 

TAMMY R BERKLEY 

September 17,2010 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Acting Associate Director, X-50 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Small Community Air Service Development Grant Application 

Docket OST-2010-0124 

Columbia Metropolitan Airport - Columbia, SC 

i^-* 

TT 

LO 

c r 

'_'jL"-;fl ' 

-~~'•\Z:'~'—' 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

The City of Cayce Council strongly supports the above referenced grant application that will 

support new and improved air service from the Columbia Metropolitan Airport. The success of 

new service from the Columbia Metropolitan Airport is critically important to the health and 

growth of our city's economy and the overall Columbia business community. 

Effective this date, the City of Cayce Council has authorized a commitment of 

$2,000.00 for the purpose of assisting the Columbia Metropolitan Airport in obtaining additional 

scheduled commercial air service. The viability of air service improvements will provide a 

significant boost to economic development in our community through improved access for 

visitors, and most importantly, to support area businesses. 

We are pleased to have the opportunity to support this grant application. 

Sincerely, 

Elise Partiri, Mayor 

EP/tb 

cc: City of Cayce Council Members 

Mr. Steven Brown, Interim City Manager 

iSOO T^\LLHM SiKLET ' PcsT OftkT Bo\ 2004 • C'.vci:. SoLTH CAKOUV\ 2917I-200-I 

TtL. \S03) 796-9020 • f'w ^^803> r90''-}Or2 • \(.u Wtsi-irE .\DIIK{.S>: vA\\'..^:iJ)CFCA'\t:E-^i:.-r.c\
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: May 26, 2015

TO: Phil Mulrine, EPA OAQPS/SPPD

FROM: Bradley Nelson, EC/R

SUBJECT: Summary of the May 26, 2015 Meeting with Representatives from Eramet 

Marietta, Felman Production and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the main issues from Eramet Marietta and Felman 

Production on the supplemental proposal. This meeting summary will be available in the docket 

for this rulemaking (Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0895). The supplemental proposal 

was published in the Federal Register on October 6, 2014 (79 FR 60238). 

II. ATTENDEES

The following is a list of participants in the meeting.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Chuck French

Phil Mulrine

Eramet Marietta 

John Rego, Jones Day

John Willoughby, Eramet Marietta

Felman Production

Robert Powell

Policy Navigation Group

Troy Hillier

Jonathan Glendhill

EC/R, Incorporated

Bradley Nelson
III. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the main issues submitted by the Eramet Marietta 

industry in their comments on the supplemental proposal (79 FR 60238). 

• The industry believes that the final rule should include reduced opacity monitoring 

frequency for meeting the opacity limit in the final rule. They stated that if the EPA 

intends to include reduced opacity monitoring that it should be included in the rule text 

and not the preamble.

• Eramet Marietta believes that the PAH test data that it submitted for ferromanganese 

(FeMn) production is lognormally distributed and that the lognormal UPL equations 

should be used to calculate the maximum achievable control technology (MACT) Floor.

• Eramet Marietta also believes that the 7/2012 test data should not be excluded from the 

PAH data set for FeMn production. 

• The EPA representatives stated that they have had discussions with the Office of 

Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) regarding Eramet Marietta’s need for a 

3-year compliance period.
Albert DELON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0550

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 10, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
I R T PARTNERS, LP, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PANDA EXPRESS, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0375

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                          249,754 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    16,461 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                266,215 
<PP&E>                             0    
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  266,215 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        21,487,764 
<BONDS>                      43,236,631 
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                 (126,488,649)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    266,215 
<SALES>                            0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                354,943 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                243,918 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            2,437,093 
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (2,326,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           1,924,609 
<DISCONTINUED>                     0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                  1,924,609 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     1,809 
<EPS-DILUTED>                     1,809 

        

</TABLE>
George Michael HODGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1586

Supreme Court of Florida.

[February 2, 2018]

Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and C. Suzanne Bechard, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

*242We have for review George Michael Hodges's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Hodges's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Hodges's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Hodges's appeal pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Hodges responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Hodges's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Hodges is not entitled to relief. Hodges was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of ten to two. *See**Hodges v. State*, 619 So.2d 272 (Fla. 1993) ; *Hodges v. State*, 595 So.2d 929, 931 (Fla. 1992).1 Hodges's sentence of death became final in 1993. *Hodges v. Florida*, 510 U.S. 996, 114 S.Ct. 560, 126 L.Ed.2d 460 (1993). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Hodges's sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Hodges's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Hodges, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.

1

While the jury's vote recommending a sentence of death is not reflected in this Court's opinion on direct appeal, this Court stated in its opinion affirming the circuit court's denial of Hodges's postconviction motion and denying Hodges's petition for a writ of habeas corpus that the jury recommended a sentence of death by a vote of ten to two. *Hodges v. State*, 885 So.2d 338, 357 (Fla. 2004).
GULF COAST BANK & TRUST COMPANY, INC. v. Gilles J. CASSE, GMD International, Inc. and Damon Baldone

NO. 2017-C-2109

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
Cardell BROWN, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

WD 82291

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: June 28, 2019

Cardell Brown, Appellant Pro-se.

Timothy A. Blackwell, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Cardell Brown appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits. He claims in three points on appeal that the Commission erred because he was not discharged for misconduct and that the Deputy failed to make an intelligent review. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Willie WATTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3627

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Xzavirea FLEMMING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3961

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Jemario FREEMAN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2213

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ;

*561*State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
# Publicatieblad C 211A/30 a

| | ISSN 1725-2474 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 211A |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 48e jaargang30 augustus 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2474

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 211A

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

48e jaargang30 augustus 2005

---

| Nummer | Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Bekendmakingen |
| | Commissie |
| 2005/C 211A/1 | Publicatie van een vacature voor uitvoerend directeur van de Europese Autoriteit voor voedselveiligheid — (Rang A*15) (Artikel 29, lid 2, van het Statuut) — COM/2005/10007 | 1 |

Nummer

Inhoud

Bladzijde

III   Bekendmakingen

Commissie

2005/C 211A/1

Publicatie van een vacature voor uitvoerend directeur van de Europese Autoriteit voor voedselveiligheid — (Rang A*15) (Artikel 29, lid 2, van het Statuut) — COM/2005/10007

1

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

III Bekendmakingen

Commissie

| 30.8.2005 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CA 211/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2005

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CA 211/1

---

Publicatie van een vacature voor

UITVOEREND DIRECTEUR

van de Europese Autoriteit voor voedselveiligheid

(Rang A*15)

(Artikel 29, lid 2, van het Statuut)

COM/2005/10007

(2005/C 211 A/01)

De Europese Autoriteit voor voedselveiligheid heeft een vacature voor de functie van uitvoerend directeur.

Sollicitanten dienen in het bezit te zijn van de nationaliteit van een van de lidstaten van de Europese Unie.

De uitvoerend directeur wordt benoemd door de raad van bestuur van de Autoriteit. Benoeming vindt plaats aan de hand van een door de Europese Commissie opgestelde lijst van geselecteerde kandidaten. Het salaris en de arbeidsvoorwaarden komen overeen met de voor Europese ambtenaren in rang A*15 geldende bepalingen in het Statuut. De Autoriteit en de Commissie voeren een beleid voor gelijke kansen.

De functiebeschrijving, sollicitatieformulieren en instructies voor sollicitanten kunnen worden gedownload van:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

of

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/efsa/index_en.htm

De termijn voor de ontvangst van de sollicitaties is 5 oktober 2005 (zie de instructies voor sollicitanten).

---