alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10250]


Notice of Renewal of the Charter of the Department of State's 
Advisory Committee on Private International Law

    The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Advisory 
Committee on Private International Law. Through the Committee, the 
Department of State obtains the views of the public with respect to 
significant private international law issues that arise in 
international organizations of which the United States is a Member 
State, in international bodies in whose work the United States has an 
interest, or in the foreign relations of the United States.
    The Committee is comprised of representatives from other government 
agencies, representatives of national organizations, and experts and 
professionals active in the field of international law.
    Comments should be sent to the Office of the Assistant Legal 
Adviser for Private International Law at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92c2dbded2e1e6f3e6f7bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d4d54515d6e697c6978337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>. Copies of the 
draft Charter may be obtained by contacting Tricia Smeltzer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9be8f6fef7efe1fee9eff0dbe8effaeffeb5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="691a040c051d130c1b1d02291a1d081d0c470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>.

Michael S. Coffee,
Attorney- Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of the 
Legal Adviser, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2017-28461 Filed 1-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR 15D-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
  OF 1934 AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daugherty Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the
undersigned, Michael P. Windisch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the date and for the periods reported therein.

/s/ Michael P. Windisch

Michael P. Windisch
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Jacob
Schub  the Chief Accounting  Officer,
Secretary  and Director of Global Dynamics Corp , certifies, under the
standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      March 16, 2010
            GLOBAL
      DYNAMICS CORP.By:
            /s/ Jacob SchubName: Jacob
      Schub
              Title:    Chief Accounting
       Officer,
  Secretary  and  Director




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 99.9

 

CONSENT OF PHIL WILSON

 

In connection with Franco-Nevada Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments thereto, and any documents incorporated by reference therein, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Annual Report”), I hereby consent to the use of and references to my name, and the inclusion and incorporation by reference in the Annual Report of the information approved by me that is of a scientific or technical nature and all other references to such information included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and the registration statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-210295), on Form S-8 (No. 333-176856) and on Form F-10 (No. 333-210878).

 

|                    |           |   |
|-------------------------|----------------|--------|
| DATED:                  | March 22, 2017 |   |
|                    |           |
| /s/ Phil Wilson         |           |
| Name: Phil Wilson, CEng |           |

 

			 		

----
### Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 8463 Dir iD: 2014

- NM

- 226

- AD

. C ontacts. W i th w h o m o u t si de t he F A A h a s th i s prop os al been d i s c u s s ed?

O rgan i z at i on P er s on C ont a c ted D ate R e s pon s e

N at i o n a l B u s ine s s Aircr af t A ss o ci at i on E li C ott i 9 / 24 / 14

Re g i o n a l Airline A ss o ci at i o n 9 / 24 / 14

Aircr af t O w ners & P il ot s A s s o ci at i o n R o bert Ha ck m a n 9 / 24 / 14

Airlines fo r A m erica R o bert I rel a nd 9 / 24 / 14
Janero James PRATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4685

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
----

Action brought on 15 June 2005 by Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-253/05)

(2005/C 229/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against the Kingdom of the Netherlands was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 15 June 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Minas Konstantinidis and Pieter Van Nuffel, acting as Agents.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas and main arguments:

The Netherlands legislation contains a clear restriction on intra-Community trade in beer, cold drinks and water in single-purpose plastic or glass packaging already marketed in another Member States. The Commission is of the view that this trade restriction is in breach of Article 18 of Directive 94/62 under which Member States may not impede the placing on the market of their territory of packaging which satisfies the provisions of this Directive.

Packaging marketed in another Member State is deemed to satisfy the essential requirements of the directive; dealing in them on the internal market cannot therefore be impeded.

----

(1)OJ 1994 L 365, p. 10.

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3984

___________

Kelvin Moore, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

David Inman, * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Appellee. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: October 4, 2006 

Filed: October 17, 2006

___________

Before RILEY, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Kelvin Moore (Moore) appeals the district court’s preservice

dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Moore alleged David Inman, an

officer with the Caruthersville Police Department, searched his vehicle in violation of

the Fourth Amendment.

We grant Moore leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Following de novo review,

see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude

preservice dismissal was inappropriate. It is not apparent on this record that success

on Moore’s claim would necessarily imply the invalidity of any state court conviction.

See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487 n.7 (1994) (because of doctrines like
-2-

independent source, inevitable discovery, and harmless error, a damages suit for an

unreasonable search may lie even if the challenged search produced evidence that was

introduced at a state criminal trial resulting in § 1983 plaintiff’s still-outstanding

conviction), Moore, 200 F.3d at 1171-72 (noting footnote 7 and concluding a § 1983

unlawful-seizure claim was not barred by Heck). Further, there are no ongoing state

proceedings that would justify the district court’s abstention. See Younger v. Harris,

401 U.S. 37, 43-54 (1971) (holding, with some exceptions, federal courts cannot grant

injunctive relief that would interfere with ongoing state criminal prosecutions); Fuller

v. Ulland, 76 F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir. 1996) (under certain circumstances, Younger

directs federal courts to abstain from hearing cases when there is an ongoing state

judicial proceeding).

Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings in

accordance with this opinion.

______________________________
Michael L. JACKSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1847

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Lisa E. CARLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81652

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: May 28, 2019

Katharine P. Curry, for Appellant.

Mary H. Moore, for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Carlock appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Pettis County denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                      30,957,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,139,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,031,438
<PP&E>                                       8,945,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,242,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,440,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,081
<OTHER-SE>                                  77,468,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,242,582
<SALES>                                     54,450,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,450,787
<CGS>                                       36,859,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,627,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (257,772)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             243,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,836,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,031,472
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,805,366
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,805,366
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28457]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express and Priority Mail 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 4, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 28, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 61 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2018-119, CP2018-162.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-28457 Filed 1-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Lawrence ZEWIEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5344

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 13, 2018

Lawrence Zewiey, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Mike GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1037

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and EMAS and LUCK, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, C.J.

*1149Mike Gonzalez ("the defendant") appeals the trial court's denial of his postconviction motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his postconviction motion, the defendant contested his sentence on two grounds: (1) his convictions for attempted home invasion robbery and burglary of a dwelling with a battery constituted double jeopardy; and (2) the 90-month sentence reflected on the judgment for trespass, a second degree misdemeanor, and carrying a concealed weapon, a first degree misdemeanor, did not conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement and was in excess of the statutory maximums. However, the only argument raised on appeal is the trial court's failure to correct the sentence as to the second ground raised below. Because the claim on appeal is well-taken, we reverse the trial court's order denying relief and remand for correction of the judgment and sentences to reflect the trial court's oral pronouncement-that the defendant was sentenced to "credit for time-served" for trespass and carrying a concealed weapon-and to reflect a sentence no greater than what the law provides for these two misdemeanor offenses. Thus, the judgment and sentences shall be corrected on remand to read that the defendant was sentenced to: (1) sixty days, with credit for the sixty days the defendant served as to Count IV, trespass to a structure or conveyance; and (2) 364 days, with credit for the 364 days the defendant served as to Count VI, carrying a concealed weapon.

Reversed and remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence.
STAT E OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION NASHVI L LE , TENNESSEE 37243-0435 ROBERT J

. MARTIN E AU , JR. BILL HASLA M COMM I SS I ONER GOVERNOR
June 5, 2012

Ms. Gwendo l yn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 4 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta , Georgia 30303-3104 Subject: 

### NPL State Concurrence C linch River Corporation 728 Emory Drive, Harriman, Roane County, Tennessee. TDOR: 73-505/EPA ID: TND987768587
Dear Ms. F l emi ng:
The United States Environmenta l Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Request for Concurrence on May 16, 2012 concerning the State of Tennessee's support for the addition of the Clinch River Corporation Site to the National Priority List (NPL). We would like to take this opportunity to confirm that the State of Tennessee supports the l isting of the Clinch River Corporation site to the NPL. In add i tion to the State supporting listing, the Harriman City Council also passed resolution RO 11 2-0 I in January 20 1 2 supporting the listing ofthe Site to the NPL.
We wo ul d a lso like to recognize the EPA Region 4 Superfund Division Emergency Response and Remova l Branch (ERRB) for their tire less assistance over the past year. We appreciate the good work that ERRB has performed at t he site and understand that much remains to be done before the C i ty of Harriman can put this property back into productive use as a waterfront park. Please contact Andy Binford, Director of the Division of Remediation, at (6 1 5) 532-0911 if you have any questions.

# ~

Robert J. Martineau , Jr. Commissioner
Cc: Andy B inford , TDEC Frankl in E. Hi ll , EPA
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Bloggerwave, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KT/A for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ulrik Svane Thomsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Ulrik Svane Thomsen By: Ulrik Svane Thomsen Chief Executive Officer  Dated: November 16, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 10964 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Cassidy Roy Denham Lush,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:23
- CR
- 11 - 1

**______________ ________________**  Before **Wiener, Stewart,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cassidy Roy Denham Lush has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Denham Lush has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t he relevant portions of the record

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 29, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10964 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024No. 23
- 10964

2 reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2 . Case: 23-10964 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/29/2024
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 25, 2020

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D 20

- 1356 Lower Tribunal No. 16

- 7234 A

________________


### Dawn Kirkconnell , Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces , Judge. Dawn Kirkconnell , in proper person. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON, and LOBREE , JJ. HENDON, J.2 Dawn Kirkcon nell appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to reduce or modify her sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). Rule 3.800(c) provides that , where no direct appeal has been filed, “[a] court may reduce or modify to includ e any of the provisions of chapter 948, Florida Statutes, a legal sentence imposed by it, sua sponte, or upon motion filed, within [sixty] days after the imposition.” Ms. Kirkconnell’s sentence was entered on February 12, 2020,
and by the time Ms. Kirkconn ell filed her rule 3.800(c) motion on June 16, 202 0, the sixty

- day time period in which to file had expired. The trial court accordingly denied
her 3.800(c) motion to mitigate because it was untimely filed more than sixty days after imposition of sentence. “[T]he sixty

- day requirement of Rule 3.800(c) is jurisdictional,” and “[t]he trial court properly denie[s] [a defendant ’ s] motion as untimely [where] it was filed more than sixty days from the date his sentence was imposed.” Hernandez v. State , 109 So. 3d 865, 865 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ; Berki v. State , 298 So. 3d 1169 (Fla. 3d
DCA 2020) (dismissing the appeal, a s the lower tribunal's order denying , on the merits , a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion to mitigate sentence is not an appeala ble order ) (citations omitted). However, a circuit court order dismissing a rule 3.800(c) motion as untimely may be reviewed by petition for writ of certiorari in the district court. Kwapil v. State , 44 So. 3d 229, 230 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ; Velazquez v. Stat e , 917 So. 2d 306, 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) . Because the3 trial court did not deny Kirkconnell’s petition on the merits, we treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari, and deny the same. See Montesino v. State , 231 So. 3d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017); Hernandez v. State , 109 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Petition denied.