alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Discount Dental Materials, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Douglas Barton, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: February 27, 2010 /s/ R. Douglas Barton R. Douglas Barton  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>        Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>          Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                        164
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                1098
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                  1585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             3310
<PP&E>                       1666
<DEPRECIATION>               (761)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               5537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        1050
<BONDS>                       600
<COMMON>                        2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                   3496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 5537
<SALES>                      3081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             3081
<CGS>                        1584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                1584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             1267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             29
<INCOME-PRETAX>               283
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           283
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                  283
<EPS-PRIMARY>                0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                0.10
        

</TABLE>
----

Removal from the Register of Case T-228/04 (1)

(2005/C 143/83)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 11 April 2005, the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-228/04, Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities.

----

(1)OJ C 247 of 12.10.2002.

----
Darron HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-760

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Converted by EDGARwiz



 

January
26, 2007

TO
WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

RE:
CONCLUSION OF BLACKOUT PERIOD




The
trading blackout was imposed by the Company because of and specifically relating
to the Royalty Pharma negotiations.




When
these negotiations have reached a conclusion, and a news release is issued with
respect to same, announcing any final agreement to the public, and the material
facts that you are presently in possession of by reason of your special
relationship with the Company can be considered as having been absorbed by the
market, the blackout will be lifted and insider trading restrictions will not
longer apply.




No
time frame can be provided with respect to the length of time the negotiations
will take.




Once
the news release has been disseminated on the wires, the length of time that it
takes for the material facts to be generally disseminated and received by the
public is not hard and fast, but a reasonable time period must pass following
the dissemination of the news release. A good rule of thumb would be a 24 hour
hold following dissemination and filing on SEDAR.




IF
YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER, PLEASE CALL PATRICIA PURDY
AT 604 696-3604 (or email at plpurdy@vancouver-law.com) FOR
CLARIFICATION.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND III JUNE 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,788
<PP&E>                                      10,486,063
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,671,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,358,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,088,597
<BONDS>                                      3,046,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     278,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,358,649
<SALES>                                        376,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               376,250
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  256,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               307,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (218,327)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (218,327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (218,327)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.98)
        

</TABLE>
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT MARCH 21, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 06- 1520 4 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 06-00005 -CR- 4 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Plaintiff-Appellee,
ve rs us MARC ELINO RAMIREZ RABELO, D ef en dant- Appe llant.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ Appea l from

the United State s District Court fo r the S outhe rnD istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (M ar ch 21, 200 7) Before TJO FL AT , B LA CK and MARC US , C ircuit Judg es PE R CU RIA M: St ep he n M
. Mc Cu ske r, appoi nte d c ouns el f or Marc el ino Ram ir ez Ra

be lo i n thi s di re ct

c ri m ina l a

ppe al , ha s m ove d to w ith dr awf ro m f urthe r re pr es en ta tio n of the appe llant and f

ile d abr ie f pur suant t o A nde rs v. Ca lif or nia , 386 U
. S. 738 , 872

S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L .E d.2d 493 (196 7). Our independent reviewof the entire r ecord
rev eal s t ha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Beca use independ ent exam ination of the entire r ecord re veals no arguable issues of m er it, c ouns el ’ s m oti on t o w ith dr awis GRA NTE D , and R ab el o’ s c onvi ct ion and sentence are AF FIRMED
.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6586
ANTHONY BERNARD PAGE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LAWRENCE SAUNDERS, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-275-AM) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Bernard Page, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Page v. Saunders , No. CA-96-275-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gaylord M. Karren, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



DATE:  August 18, 2003







/s/ Gaylord M. Karren___________

Gaylord M. Karren

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc.
Pierre Louis MERONE and Clementine Merone, Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a the Bank of New York, as Trustee FOR the CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-OA3 MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OA3, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3736

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 799-800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-44-000]


Notice of Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund 
Effective Date; Southern California Edison Company

    On December 29, 2017, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL18-44-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the 
Proposed Formula Rates of Southern California Edison Company may be 
unjust and unreasonable. Southern California Edison Company, 161 FERC 
61,309 (2017).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-44-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-44-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE, Washington, DC

[[Page 800]]

20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 days of the date of 
issuance of the order.

    Dated: January 2, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00092 Filed 1-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 576 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 576

Recognizing that allowing illegal immigrants and noncitizens the right 
   to vote devalues the franchise and diminishes the voting power of 
                        United States citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2023

Ms. Malliotakis submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing that allowing illegal immigrants and noncitizens the right 
   to vote devalues the franchise and diminishes the voting power of 
                        United States citizens.

Whereas voting is fundamental to a functioning democracy;
Whereas the Constitution prohibits discrimination in voting based on race, sex, 
        poll taxes, and age;
Whereas it is of paramount importance that the United States maintains the 
        legitimacy of its elections and protects them from interference, 
        including interference from foreign threats and illegal voting;
Whereas New York City, New York, has enacted a law in violation of the 
        Constitution to allow certain noncitizens who reside in New York City 
        for only 30 days to be eligible to vote in local elections for mayor, 
        city council, and others;
Whereas mayors incentivize the mass migration of tens of thousands of 
        individuals taking advantage of the Biden administration's open borders 
        by offering free housing and other services; and
Whereas the Constitution and Federal law prohibit noncitizens from voting in 
        elections for Federal office: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes that 
allowing illegal immigrants and noncitizens the right to vote devalues 
the franchise and diminishes the voting power of United States 
citizens.
                                 <all>
```
September 21, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Incorporation by Reference of Rulemaking Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0462 

FROM: Butch Stackhouse

State and Local Programs Group, AQPD (C539-01) 

TO: Public Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0885 

The proposed rulemaking entitled, ”Rule to Implement a reconsidered 2010 8-Hour

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard ” relies in part on the information that is included

in Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0462 for ”Proposed Rule to Implement the 1997 8-Hour

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard: New Source Review Anti-Backsliding

Provisions for Former 1-Hour Ozone Standard.” Consequently, the contents of Docket No. EPAHQ-OAR-2008-0462 are incorporated by reference into this Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-

0885.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14162-14163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Site Visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at Yale University, also called Center 
for Research on Interface Structures and Phenomena, by NSF Division 
of Materials Research (DMR) <greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: Thursday, May 7, 2009; 7:45 a.m.-9 p.m.; Friday, 
May 8, 2009; 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: Yale University, New Haven, CT.
    Type of Meeting: Part-open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Rieker, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-8428.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at Yale University.
    Agenda:

Thursday, May 7, 2009

7:45 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive Session.
9 a.m.-4:15 p.m. Open--Review of the Yale MRSEC.
4:15 p.m.-6 p.m. Closed--Executive Session.
6 p.m.-9 p.m. Open--Poster Session and Dinner.

Friday, May 8, 2009

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive session.
9 a.m.-9:45 a.m. Open--Review of the Yale MRSEC.

[[Page 14163]]

9:45 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report.
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 24, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-6931 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7308

LEE WAYNE HUNT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA L. CHAVIS; ROGER THOMPSON; EMILIO

PAGAN; SAMUEL SMITH,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DANIEL L. STIENEKE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-98-942-5-F)

Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 28, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Wayne Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Lee Wayne Hunt appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hunt’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Hunt v. Chavis, No. CA-98-942-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 25,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.04

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                                          [DATE]

For value received, (hereinafter referred to as the "Borrower") promises to pay
to the order of Topaz Resources, Inc., a Florida Corporation (hereinafter
referred to as the "Lender") in the City of Denton, Texas or at such other place
as the holder hereof may, from time to time designate in writing, the sum of
______________ United States Dollars and _______ cents (U.S. $___________), in
legal and lawful money of the United States of America, with interest on the
principal outstanding from time to time from [Date] until paid, both before and
after maturity, at the rate of three and one quarter percent (3.25%) per annum.

The principal of this Note is due and payable on demand. The accrued interest is
due and payable annually in arrears on the anniversary date. The Borrower may
pay all or part of any of principal and/or interest before any due date. Any
prepayment may be made without notice, penalty or bonus and any subsequent
interest shall be calculated only on any remaining outstanding balance.

In the event this Note, or any part hereof, is collected through Bankruptcy or
other judicial proceedings by an attorney or is placed in the hands of an
attorney for collection after maturity, then the Borrower agrees and promises to
pay a reasonable attorney's fee for collection.

The Borrower expressly requires notice of all demands for payment, presentation
for payment, protest and notice of protest, as to this Note but the Lender,
payee or other holder of this Note may at any time, from time to time and upon
notice in writing to the Borrower, extend the terms of payment or date of
maturity hereof.

This Note may be assigned, pledged or hypothecated by the Lender or holder upon
notice to the Borrower and is made without recourse to any director, officer or
employee of the Borrower.

Any notice, demand or request relating to any matter set forth in this Note
shall be given in writing.

This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Texas.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Note to be duly executed on its
behalf by its officer duly authorized thereunto.

                                          Borrower


                                          Per:
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name & Title


                                          Per:
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name & Title
Mary-John Haire THORNTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s) v. In re: GUARDIANSHIP OF: Lorene L. CASTLEMAN, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4575

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 05, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michael BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3257

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Wilbur Tishan ALI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Oliver AGUERO, VI, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Appellee.

No. 3D17-0171

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 4, 2018

Oliver Aguero, VI, in proper person.

Matthew R. Daley, Assistant General Counsel (Tallahassee), for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant's initial brief, we find no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated. We, therefore, summarily affirm the order on appeal. See Fla. R. App. 9.315(a).
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2014

No. 04-14-00288-CR

Ricardo Roger MORALES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-1384-CR-A

William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Ms. Patricia Wagner is one of the reporters responsible for preparing, certifying, and 

filing the reporter’s record in this appeal. The reporter’s record was originally due from Ms. 

Wagner on August 4, 2014. On August 11, 2014, this court notified Ms. Wagner that the record 

was late. On that same date, Ms. Wagner filed a Notification of Late Record asking for a sixtyday extension of time in which to file the record, until October 11, 2014. 

The request is GRANTED and Ms. Wagner is hereby ORDERED to file her portion of 

the reporter’s record no later than October 13, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court