alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**61 CAF 10-00475**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF PAIGE K. AND NICHOLAS T.

-------------------------------------------- OSWEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;

JAY J.B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

DAVISON LAW OFFICE, PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

CARACCIOLI & NELSON, PLLC, MEXICO (ANNALISE M. DYKAS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

SUSAN B. MARRIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, MANLIUS, FOR PAIGE K. AND NICHOLAS T.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Kimberly M. Seager, J.), entered February 1, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudged that respondent had neglected and abused the subject children.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Family Court granted petitioner’s motion for summary judgment on the petition, which sought a determination that respondent abused his girlfriend’s son and derivatively neglected the son’s older sister. We note at the outset that respondent’s contentions concern only the alleged derivative neglect of the sister, and that he does not challenge the finding of abuse in connection with his girlfriend’s son. In addition, we note that respondent’s contentions in opposition to the motion for summary judgment are raised for the first time on appeal and are therefore not properly before us ( see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora , 202 AD2d 984, 985). In any event, contrary to respondent’s contention, petitioner established as a matter of law that respondent was a person legally responsible for the sister ( see § 1012 [g]; see generally Matter of Yolanda D. , 88 NY2d 790, 796) and that, when he abused his girlfriend’s son by murdering him, he thereby derivatively neglected the sister ( see Matter of Justice T. , 305 AD2d 1076, lv denied 100 NY2d 512; see generally Matter of Jovon J. , 51 AD3d 1395; Matter of Seth G ., 50 AD3d 1530). Contrary to the contention of respondent, he failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see generally**-2- 61 CAF 10-00475** 
Zuckerman v City of New York , 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 13.2
 
 Certification
 
 For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Yue Kou, the Chief Financial Officer of  Dragon Jade International Limited. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:
 
 (i)  the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  August 10, 2011
By: /s/ Yue KouChief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT SANDONATO,

Appellant,

v.

JOSE GUZMAN,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-3191

[ April 6, 2016 ]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael G. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

FMCE 98-005230.

Robert Sandonato, Miami, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate a 

permanent injunction allegedly entered in 1998. Appellant has not shown 

any reversible error in the court’s order, and appellant has attempted to 

raise matters for the first time on appeal that he did not present below. 

On appeal, appellant alleges that he was advised by the circuit court

clerk that the file for this 1998 case has been destroyed, yet he asserts 

that his prison classification officer has informed him that an injunction 

in this case impacts his eligibility for certain programs in prison. The 

circuit court’s online docket for this case reflects that a “temporary 

injunction” was entered in April 1998. Appellant’s motions to vacate or 

dissolve an injunction in the underlying case number may in fact be moot. 

Appellant should pursue administrative remedies within the 

Department of Corrections, and if necessary, obtain clarification from the 

circuit court as to whether any injunction order remains in force in this 

case. 

Affirmed.
2

CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 62 (Thursday, April 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-100-08-1310-DB]


Notice of Rescheduled Meeting of the Pinedale Anticline Working 
Group

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(1976) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (1972), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Pinedale 
Anticline Working Group (PAWG) will meet in Pinedale, Wyoming. This 
meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The May 28, 2009 meeting has been rescheduled to coincide with 
the public comment period for an environmental assessment. The PAWG 
will meet the following date beginning at 1 p.m.: May 7, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the BLM Pinedale Field Office, 
1625 West Pine Street, Pinedale, WY.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelley Gregory, PAWG Designated 
Federal Officer, Bureau of Land Management, Pinedale Field Office, 1625 
West Pine Street., PO Box 768, Pinedale WY 82941; 307-367-5328; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91e2f9f4fdfdf4e8cef6e3f4f6fee3e8d1f3fdfcbff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="becdd6dbd2d2dbc7e1d9ccdbd9d1ccc7fedcd2d390d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 25, 2008, the Secretary of the 
Interior renewed the Charter for the PAWG which advises the BLM on the 
development and implementation of monitoring plans and adaptive 
management decisions as development of the Pinedale Anticline Natural 
Gas Field proceeds.
    The agenda for this meeting will include discussions concerning 
task group recommendations and overall adaptive management 
implementation. Public comments will be heard at the commencement and 
prior to adjournment of each meeting.

    Dated: March 27, 2009.
Chuck Otto,
Field Office Manager.
 [FR Doc. E9-7387 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D19-609

________________ _____________
R EGINALD B ROWN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County. Angela M. Cox, Judge.

July 8, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W ETHERELL , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________2 Reginald Brown, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Genera l, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit
32





Certification
pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithtown Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), Bradley E. Rock, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and Christopher Becker, Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial
Officer of Smithtown Bancorp, Inc. each certify in their capacity as officers of
the Company that to the best of their knowledge:





the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations.





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.





August
      2, 2010
              By: /s/ Bradley E. RockChairman
      and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
      2, 2010
              By: /s/ Christopher
  BeckerExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jeffery C.
      Swank, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Jeffery C. Swank


Jeffery
      C. Swank


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


Date:
      May 14, 2007








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 518 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 518

  Pushing back against the labeling of attempts by parents to ensure 
  school curriculum and sports are age and sex appropriate as extreme.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2023

   Mrs. McClain (for herself, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Babin, Mrs. Miller of 
   Illinois, Mr. Self, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, and Mr. Webster of 
Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Pushing back against the labeling of attempts by parents to ensure 
  school curriculum and sports are age and sex appropriate as extreme.

Whereas all students should feel welcome in their classroom, but radical far-
        left ideas inappropriate for minors should not;
Whereas it is not extreme or hateful to believe children as young as 6 should 
        not be subject to discussion about sexual orientation or gender ideology 
        in the classroom;
Whereas it is not extreme or hateful to believe biological men should not 
        compete against biological women in sports;
Whereas, while issues dealing with the history of slavery and racism should be 
        taught in the classroom, courses centered around the false belief that 
        America is systemically, structurally, or institutionally racist should 
        not;
Whereas it is not extreme or hateful to believe that parents, not the 
        government, should have the final say in their children's education; and
Whereas attempts to express these views in a violent manner are inexcusable: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports parents having a say in their child's 
        education; and
            (2) opposes--
                    (A) allowing biological boys and men to compete in 
                biological girls and women's sports;
                    (B) the weakening of title IX protections; and
                    (C) labeling parents as extreme and hateful for 
                wanting to keep inappropriate material out of their 
                child's classroom.
                                 <all>
```
waivertml.htm


    Exhibit
10.46

    


    TRADEMARK LICENSE WAIVER
AGREEMENT

    


    


    This Waiver Agreement, dated as of
March 3, 2010, is by and between Hallmark Licensing, Inc. (“Hallmark Licensing”)
and Crown Media United States, LLC (“Crown Media”).

    


    WHEREAS, Crown Media and Hallmark
Licensing have previously entered into that certain (1) Amended and Restated
Trademark License Agreement between the parties dated as of March 27, 2001 as
extended on November 30, 2002, as of August 28, 2003, as of  August 1,
2004, as of August 1, 2005, as of April 10, 2006, as of August 1, 2007, as of
August 1, 2008 and August 15, 2009 (“HC TM License Agreement”) and (2) Movie
Channel Trademark License Agreement between the parties dated as of January 1,
2004, as extended as of August 1, 2004, as of August 1, 2005, as of April 10,
2006, as of August 1, 2007, as of August 1, 2008 and August 15, 2009 (“HMC TM
License Agreement”);

    


    WHEREAS, under Section 8(e) of each
of the HC TM License Agreement and HMC TM License Agreement, Crown Media would
be in default if its auditors determine that Crown Media is no longer a going
concern (the “Event of Default”);

    


    WHEREAS, Crown Media’s auditor has
advised that  it will issue an opinion on March 4, 2010 in connection
with its audit of Crown Media’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 which indicates that there doubts about Crown
Media’s ability to continue as a concern (“KPMG Opinion”);

    


    WHEREAS,
receiving such an opinion would trigger an Event of Default under each of the HC
TM License Agreement and HMC TM License Agreement; and

    


    WHEREAS, Crown Media has requested that
Hallmark Licensing waive this Event of Default and Hallmark Licensing is willing
to grant such waiver.

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, Crown Media and
Hallmark Licensing hereby agree as follows:

    


    
      1. Subject
to the terms and conditions set forth herein, Hallmark Licensing hereby agrees
to waive the Event of Default triggered by Crown Media’s receipt of the KPMG
Opinion.  This waiver shall only apply in connection with this KPMG
Opinion and shall not apply to any future instances or opinions in connection
with any future audits or financial statements.

    

    


    2. All other
terms and conditions of the HC TM License Agreement and HMC TM License Agreement
shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

    


     
 


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have executed this Trademark License Waiver Agreement as of the date set forth
above.

    


    


    HALLMARK
LICENSING, INC.

    


    


    


    By:
_/s/ C. Todd
Navrat__________________

          Name:
C. Todd Navrat

          Title:
Vice President

    


    


    


    CROWN
MEDIA UNITED STATES, LLC

    


    


    


    By:
__/s/ Charles
Stanford________________

          Name:
Charles Stanford

          Title:
Vice President
Order entered June 4, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00190-CV

JULIE STULL & JMJ PRODUCTION, Appellants

V.

GENERAL MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-00402-E

ORDER

We DENY appellants’ June 4, 2013 motion for continuance without prejudice to filing a 

motion waiving oral argument.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
Michael Loring HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1882

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
----

----

| ý |   | QUARTERLY      REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | SECURITIES      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934                                          |
|   |   |                                                                          |
|   |   | For      the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009                        |
|   |   | OR                                                                            |
|   |   |
| o      |   | TRANSITION      REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE                 |
|   |   | SECURITIES      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934                                          |
|   |   |                                                                          |
|   |   | For      the transition period from ________________ to      ________________ |

| Delaware                                      |   | 52-1256615               |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| (State      or other jurisdiction of          |   | (I.R.S.      Employer    |
| incorporation      or organization)           |   | Identification      No.) |
|                                          |   |                     |
| 10220-L      Old Columbia Road                |   |                     |
| Columbia,      Maryland                       |   | 21076                    |
| (Address      of principal executive offices) |   | (Zip      Code)          |
|                                          |   |                     |

----

Part II of our Quarterly Report is hereby amended solely to addthe following exhibits required to be filed in connection with this AmendmentNo. 1.

| 31.1   | Certification      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as      adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed      herewith) |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| 31.2   | Certification      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as      adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed      herewith) |

----
Troy C. JESTER a/k/a Troy Charles Jester, individually and as trustee of the 4189 Grandchamp Trust dated January 18, 2008; and Lawrence D. Jester, Appellants, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, d/b/a Christiana Trust, as trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisitions Trust, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 09 -0 01 29 -C R

______________________________ CA RL A N EV I LRA

NSO M, a/k/ a CARL A NEVI LRANSOM KECK, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appea l from the 354th J udicial District Court

Hunt County , Texas Trial Court No. 23374

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Carla Nevil Ransom, a

/k/a Carla Nevil Ransom K eck, has filed a notice of appe al from the adjudication of her g uilt of possession of a controlled substance (methamphe tamine, in an amount
o f l es s t h an o n e gr am ). On o u r r ev i ew o f t h e c l er k 's re co rd , we n o t edt h at t h e t ri al co u rt 's
certificat io n o f r ig h t o f a

p p e a l s tate d th a t th is w a s a p le a a g r e e me n t c a s e an d th a t Ra n s o m h a s no rig ht of appe al. Unless a c ertifica

tion, showing that a defenda nt has t he right of appea l, is in the re cord, w e
mus t di smi ss t

he a pp e a l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). We sent a letter to Ransom' s counsel, informing h i m o f t h e d efe ct in the re cord a nd reque sting c ounsel to show this Court how we had jurisdi ction over the appea l. Counsel has now verifie d that this was a plea ag ree ment case
. B e c a u s e t h e t r i a l c o u rt ' s c e rt i f i c a t i o n a f f i r m a t i v e l y s h o w s R an s o m h a s n o r i g h t of a pp e a l, beca use Ransom' s counsel has ve rified that this was a plea ba rg ain ca se, an d b ec au s e the re cord befor e us does not r efle ct that the ce rtification is incorr ect, see De ar s v . S tat e , 154 S.W .3d 610, 615 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 05 ), we mus t di smi ss t he a pp e a l.3

We dismi ss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction.

Ba iley C. Moseley J ustice
Date Submitted: J uly 14, 2009 Date D ecide d: J uly 15, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: August 20, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: August 20, 2014, Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on August 20, 

2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The majority of the 

discussion centered on how goals were established for the states in Region 7: Iowa, Kansas, 

Missouri, and Nebraska. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on 

June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7:

Mark A. Smith

Ward Burns

Toni Gargas

Amy Bhesania

Josh Tapp

Mike Jay

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Christine Paulson

Kansas Department of Health and 

Environment

Melissa Weide

Miles Stotts

Lynn Deahl

Tom Gross

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

Mark Leath

Emily Wilbur

Paul Meyers

Nebraska Department of Environmental 

Quality
Adam Yarina