alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ielement8k122807ex2.htm


    Release
      of Employment
      Agreement

    


    Pursuant
      to the certain Stock Purchase
      Agreement by and between IElement Corporation (“Seller”) and Ivan Zweig
      (“Buyer”) and for
      limited purposes IElement Inc. dated as of December 12,
      2007, the parties have agreed to release each other from any and all liability
      under that certain Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2007 as disclosed
      in
      the Seller’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on April 20,
      2007 (the “Employment
      Agreement”).  The terms of the release are set forth
      herein.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the
      covenants and agreements contained in the said letter:

    


    1.  The
      parties hereby
      release and forever discharge each other of and from all manner of action and
      actions, cause and causes of action, suits, rights, debts, dues, sums of money,
      accounts, bonds, bills, covenants, contracts, controversies, omissions,
      agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages, liabilities, judgments,
      executions, claims and demands whatsoever (collectively, "Claims"), in law or in equity,
      which either party ever had, now has or which it hereafter can, shall or may
      have, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, matured or unmatured,
      fixed or contingent, for, upon or by reason of any matter or cause arising
      at
      any time on or prior to the date of this Release solely in connection with
      the
      Employment Agreement.

    


    2.  The
      Employment Agreement
      is hereby terminated, void and unenforceable.

    


    3.  Effective
      with this
      Release, Buyer hereby resigns from any and all positions he held with Seller,
      including but not limited to his positions as Chief Executive Officer and as
      a
      member of the Board of Directors.

    


    4.  This
      Release shall be
      governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas
      applicable to contracts made and to be performed wholly therein.

    


    The
      Parties have executed this Agreement on the day first above
      written.

    


    


    IElement
      Corporation:

    


    


    By:                                           
      

    Name:                                                      
      

    Title:                                                      
      

    


    


    


    Ivan
      Zweig
Quentin Alexander STEELE v. STATE

CR-15-1297

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAVINDER SINGH

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, 

 Respondent.

No. 09-73690

Agency. No. A074-791-346

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2014

Pasadena, California

 

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

FILED

APRIL 24 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Before: PAEZ and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior District Judge.** 

Ravinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen 

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the 

BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Najmabadi v. Holder, 

597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied Singh’s motion as 

untimely. Singh filed his motion more than ninety days after the BIA’s final 

administrative order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Unable to demonstrate 

changed circumstances in India, he also failed to qualify for the regulatory 

exception to the time limit. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii) (providing an exception 

to the ninety-day deadline for applications based on changed circumstances arising 

in the country of nationality if petitioner’s new evidence is material and was 

unavailable at the previous hearing); see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987–90 

(explaining that new evidence must be “qualitatively different” from evidence 

presented at the petitioner’s original hearing). Although Singh presented evidence 

depicting both human rights abuses in India and the targeted harassment of his 

 

 ** The Honorable J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge for the U.S. 

District Court for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.
3

family members, this evidence—while disturbing—reflects the continuation of 

patterns that have existed for much of the past two decades. Because similar 

evidence was available to Singh at the time of his original proceeding in 2000, 

Singh failed to establish changed country conditions in 2009. 

Moreover, contrary to Singh’s contention, the BIA adequately considered 

the evidence presented with his motion. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990 

(reiterating that the BIA need not “write an exegesis on every contention” raised by 

a petitioner, so long as it “consider[s] the issues raised and announce[s] its decision 

in terms sufficient [for] a reviewing court to perceive that it has heard and thought 

and not merely reacted”) (citations, quotations, and alterations omitted). For this 

reason, we reject Singh’s assertion that the BIA deprived him of due process when 

it denied his motion to reopen. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 

2000) (requiring error for a petitioner to sustain a due process claim in a removal 

proceeding). The BIA’s decision was therefore appropriate.

PETITION DENIED.
David Lee BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2800

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
McKenzie Demon ONEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                     131
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                             1231
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                               1358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          3276
<PP&E>                                    1822
<DEPRECIATION>                            (851)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            5508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      691
<BONDS>                                    684
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                3600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              5508
<SALES>                                   3042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3042
<CGS>                                     1476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            163
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        163
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                               163
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.06


</TABLE>
----

----

I Comunicações

Comissão

----

CATÁLOGO COMUM DE VARIEDADES DE ESPÉCIES AGRÍCOLAS

Quarto suplemento à vigésima terceira edição integral

(2005/C 145 A/01)

SUMARIO

Legenda

Lista das espécies de plantas agrícolas

LEGENDA

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

16A.× FESTULOLIUM

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

24.POA NEMORALIS L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

III

55.BRASSICA RAPA L. VAR. SILVESTRIS (LAM.) BRIGGS

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

73.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH

74.SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

75.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH × SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----

(1)JO C 46 A de 22.2.2005, p. 1. Catálogo com a última redacção que lhe foi dada pelo terceiro suplemento (JO C 111 A de 11.5.2005, p. 1).

(2)JO L 193 de 20.7.2002, p. 1. Directiva com a última redacção que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) n.o 1829/2003 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho (JO L 268 de 18.10.2003, p. 1).

----
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Juan J. Román, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Triple-S ManagementCorporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2005 (theReport) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and;
2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.     Date: May 12, 205 By: /s/ Juan J. Román       Juan J. Román
|   | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green Hygienics Holdings Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2018 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Green Hygienics Holdings Inc. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Ron Loudoun                                                                                  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Ron Loudoun                                                                                      |
|   | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary and Treasurer and Director |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer)       |
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2644-2645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6483]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Wine, Worship and Sacrifice: The Golden Graves of 
Ancient Vani''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 11, 2007, notice was published on page 57987 of the 
Federal Register (volume 72, number 196) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``Wine, Worship and 
Sacrifice: The Golden Graves of Ancient Vani.'' On December 27, 2007, 
the referenced notice was corrected on page 73415 of the Federal 
Register (volume 72, number 247) as to two additional objects to be 
included in the exhibition. The referenced notice is again corrected 
here as to two additional objects to be included in the exhibition. 
Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the 
authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 
U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign 
Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 
22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of 
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, 
as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 
FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Wine, Worship and Sacrifice: The Golden Graves of Ancient 
Vani,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United 
States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant 
to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also

[[Page 2645]]

determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the 
Getty Villa, Malibu, CA, from on or about July 16, 2009, until on or 
about February 8, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-655 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Butte Highland Mining Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A Hatfield, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 30, 2011

| |                                                                                                                                                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:   /s/ Paul A. Hatfield
_____________________________
Paul A. Hatfield
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
Principal Executive and Financial Officer







The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Hyperera, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated: April 14, 2014
By:
/s/ Simon BaiSimon BaiChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hyperera, Inc. and will be retained by Hyperera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Amarok Resources, Inc.


30021 Tomas Street Suite 335


Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688





February 24, 2010





Trio Gold Corp


Suite #145


251 Midpark Blvd SE


Calgary, AB T2X 1S3





RE: Share Issue Pursuant to January 28, 2010 Exploration Agreement





Gentlemen, per the above noted agreement and as a result of the Assignment agreement between Carlin Gold Resources and Amarok Resources, Inc. dated February 22, 2010, this letter confirms the share issuance to Trio Gold Corp. per clause 9.4 of the January 28, 2010 Exploration Agreement.





Amarok Resources Inc. hereby confirms the following issuance of restricted common shares to Trio Gold Corp. as follows:





1.
On or before May 28, 2010 Amarok shall issue to Trio 144,240 restricted shares of Amarok Resources, Inc.


2.
Upon expenditure by Amarok on the Rodeo Creek property of $2 million, Amarok will issue an additional 72,120 restricted shares of Amarok Resources, Inc.


3.
Upon expenditure by Amarok on the Rodeo Creek property of $4 million, Amarok will issue a further 72,120 restricted shares of Amarok Resources, Inc.


4.
Upon expenditure by Amarok on the Rodeo Creek property of a final $1.5 million, Amarok will issue final 72,120 restricted shares of Amarok Resources, Inc.





Trio, by executing this agreement acknowledges that these shares totaling 360,600 common shares of Amarok Resources, Inc. satisfies all the share obligations now and in the future owing to Trio pursuant to clause 9.4 of the January 28, 2010 Exploration Agreement between Trio Gold Corp. and Carlin Gold Resources.  Trio further acknowledges and agrees that no further shares are due it even if Amarok may have additional shares outstanding at the time of issue of these shares.





If you are in agreement with the above, please sign in the space below and return to our office.





Thank you


/s/Ron Ruskowsky


Ron Ruskowsky


President





Agreed and accepted;





/s/Harry Ruskowsky


Harry Ruskowsky


Trio Gold Corp.


President
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
John R. Oliver, Chief Financial Officer of Action Products International, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ John R. OliverJohn R. OliverChief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2006
Marquise Deontae HEARN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-49

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mobieyes Software, Inc. a Florida corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Dana Pekas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mobieyes Software, Inc., and will be retained by Mobieyes Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date: November 18, 2010  /s/Dana Pekas Dana Pekas Chief Executive Officer
Travis OVERTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0054

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.