alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Henry Perry SIRECI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1143

Supreme Court of Florida.

[January 31, 2018]

James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Julissa R. Fontán, Maria E. DeLiberato and Chelsea Shirley, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Scott A. Browne, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Henry Perry Sireci's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Sireci's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Sireci's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Sireci's appeal pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Sireci responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Sireci's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Sireci is not entitled to relief. Sireci was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of eleven to one. *Sireci v. State*, 587 So.2d 450, 451-52 (Fla. 1991). Sireci's sentence of death became final in 1992. *Sireci v. Florida*, 503 U.S. 946, 112 S.Ct. 1500, 117 L.Ed.2d 639 (1992). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Sireci's sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Sireci's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Sireci, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

*918I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jason Kates, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of rVue Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of rVue Holdings, Inc.





/s/ Jason KatesJason KatesChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the BoardDate: March 1, 2011




I, David Loppert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of rVue Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of rVue Holdings, Inc.




/s/ David  LoppertDavid LoppertChief Financial OfficerDate: March 1, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to rVue Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by rVue Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Larry Wayne CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0703

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### FAA-l.o;O-05SQ 

# P"1;hOn <-r'5 iAJ.



## +1,A."'<.A.v~i

To: Cc: Bee: Subjecf: Fw:EWISleAExemptionforHZ-HMl To: SteveSlotle/ANM/FAA@FAA, Franco Pieri/AENFAA@ITAA From: "Creager, Mark" <Mark.Creager@jetaviationeng.com> Date: 08/31/2010 02:16PM 

# I cc: Douglas Wagner/AEAJFAA@FAA, EzraSasson/AEAJFM@FAA, "Svoboda, Julie" <Julie.Svoboda@jetaviationeng.com>, Daniel Kutz/ANM/FAA@FAA, Larry Kujawski <kujawski@wcc.net> Subject: RE: EWIS leA Exemption forHZ-HMl Steve, Since the program schedule has shifted, we have been able to complete an EWIS reA, document 87478383-150-02 revision IR. This is attached. The zonal evaluation for the 

### reA, document DOR-486-10.035, revision IR, exceeds the allowable attachment size for email. We have uploaded this document to the FAA project SharePoint site and are also sending a CD with the data directly to yourself. At this I believe it would be appropriate to withdrawal the exemption petition. Best regards, Mark Creager

Jet Aviation Engineering Services Mark Creager Manager, Certification 116 Kestrel Dr. Spring Branch, TX 78070 United States Tel. +1 830 438 7486 x7108 Fax +1 830 438 7811 Mark.Creager@jetaviationeng.com
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - MegaWest Energy Corp. - Exhibit 10.35






AMENDMENT TO WARRANT ISSUANCE AGREEMENT

This AMENDMENT TO WARRANT ISSUANCE AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”), dated as of September 18, 2007 is entered into by and
between MegaWest Energy Corp. (the “Company”) and 1187016 Alberta Ltd.
(“Holder”) and amends the Warrant Issuance Agreement dated December 20,
2006 between the Company and Holder (the “Warrant Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not defined herein shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Warrant Agreement.

WHEREAS, the parties to the Warrant Agreement desire to amend
the Warrant Agreement to extend the expiration date of the Warrants.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and
the representations, warranties and agreements contained herein and for other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as
follows:

	 	1. 	
      Expiration Date. Section 3.8 of the Warrant
      Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

	 	 	 
	 		
      “The Warrants shall expire on the close of business on
      January 2, 2009 (the “Expiration Date”) and shall be void
      thereafter.”

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      Miscellaneous. This Amendment shall be governed in
      all respects by the laws of the Province of British Columbia. This
      Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts which together shall
      constitute a single agreement. Except as amended hereby, the Warrant
      Agreement shall remain in full force and effect; provided, in the event of
      any inconsistency between this Amendment and the Warrant Agreement, the
      provisions of this Amendment shall prevail.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company
and Holder have signed this Amendment or caused this Amendment to be signed by
their respective officers thereunto duly authorized all as of the date first
written above.

MEGAWEST ENERGY CORP.

	Per: 	/s/ George Stapleton, II 	 
	  	Authorized Signatory 	 


1187016 ALBERTA LTD.

	Per: 	/s/ signed 	 
	  	Authorized Signatory
Johnny Lee KING v. STATE

CR-15-0464

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Aaron C. PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1261

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Uradni list C 211A/30.

| | ISSN 1725-5244 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 211A |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 4830. avgust 2005 |

ISSN 1725-5244

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 211A

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 4830. avgust 2005

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Objave |
| | Komisija |
| 2005/C 211A/1 | Objava prostega delovnega mesta izvršnega direktorja Evropske agencije za varno hrano — (Razred A*15) (člen 29(2) Kadrovskih predpisov) — COM/2005/10007 | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

III   Objave

Komisija

2005/C 211A/1

Objava prostega delovnega mesta izvršnega direktorja Evropske agencije za varno hrano — (Razred A*15) (člen 29(2) Kadrovskih predpisov) — COM/2005/10007

1

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

III Objave

Komisija

| 30.8.2005 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 211/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2005

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 211/1

---

Objava prostega delovnega mesta

IZVRŠNEGA DIREKTORJA

Evropske agencije za varno hrano

(Razred A*15)

(člen 29(2) Kadrovskih predpisov)

COM/2005/10007

(2005/C 211 A/01)

Evropska agencija za varno hrano zaposli izvršnega direktorja.

Kandidati morajo biti državljani ene od držav članic Evropske unije.

Izvršnega direktorja imenuje upravni odbor Agencije s seznama kandidatov, ki jih izbere in predlaga Evropska komisija. Plača in pogoji so določeni s Kadrovskimi predpisi za uradnike razreda A*15 Evropskih skupnosti. Agencija in Komisija izvajata politiko enakih možnosti.

Opis delovnega mesta, obrazce za prijavo in navodila za oddajo vloge lahko prenesete z internetnega naslova:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

ali

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/efsa/index_en.htm.

Rok za sprejemanje prijav je 5. oktober 2005 (podrobnosti so v navodilih za oddajo vloge).

---
William Craig COTHRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-945

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kathleen SHORT, Appellant, v. Catherine LENHART and GEICO General Insurance Company, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-2265

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         947,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,449,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,145,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,789,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,682,141
<PP&E>                                       2,624,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                 980,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,035,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,510,606
<BONDS>                                     27,546,883
<COMMON>                                       810,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,500
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,639,132)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,035,207
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,492,089
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,941,788
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               325,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,055,296
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             325,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,775,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,775,291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,775,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
Michael D. GRIDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-838

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION

    I, Alfonso Knoll, certify that:

    1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Daleco Resources
Corporation for the period ending March 31, 2005.

    2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

    4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

    5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

                                      -42-

<PAGE>

    6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date May 13, 2005                                /s/ Alfonso Knoll
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Alfonso Knoll
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                      -43-
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In  connection  with  the Quarterly report of Broadleaf Capital Partners,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-QSB  for  the period ending  June 30, 2004, as
filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Robert A. Braner, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify  to  the  best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert A. Braner
- ---------------------------
     Robert A. Braner
     Chief Executive Officer
     September 20, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-720]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 9, 2008, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 17, 2008, (73 FR 61909), Formulation Technologies 
LLC., 11400 Burnet Road, Suite 4010, Austin, Texas 78758, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as an importer of Fentanyl (9801), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for 
analytical characterization, secondary packaging, and/or for 
distribution to clinical trial sites.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of Formulation Technologies LLC. to import the basic class 
of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and 
with United States obligations under international treaties, 
conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA 
has investigated Formulation Technologies LLC. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted 
registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance 
listed.

    Dated: January 9, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E9-720 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mobieyes Software, Inc. a Florida corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Finkelstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mobieyes Software, Inc., and will be retained by Mobieyes Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: November 18, 2010  /s/David Finkelstein David Finkelstein Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive


Officer of Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:





1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.





Dated: September 14, 2011





/s/ J. Michael King


J. Michael King,


Interim President/CFO








The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act


of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor


shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or


otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section


906, has been provided to Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. and will be retained by Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. and furnished to the


Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32
----------




                           CERTIFICATIONS OF
          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
       PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       ---------------------------------------------------------



     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of JMB/245 PARK
AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LTD.





By: /s/ Patrick J. Meara          By: /s/ Gailen J. Hull
    ----------------------            ----------------------------
    Patrick J. Meara                  Gailen J. Hull
    Chief Executive Officer           Chief Financial Officer and
                                      Principal Accounting Officer