alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   The undersigned, Ratree Yabamrung, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. the annual report on Form 10-K of SOEFL Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SOEFL Inc.  Date: April 6, 2011.  By: /s/ RATREE YABAMRUNG Ratree Yabamrung President, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SOEFL Inc. and will be retained by SOEFL Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 99.9**

 
|  |   | SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.

1300, 151 Yonge Street

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

M5C 2W7

 

T: +1.416.601.1445

F: +1.416.601.9046

 

toronto@srk.com

www.srk.com |
|--|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**CONSENT OF GLEN COLE**

 

In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 40-F (the “Form 40-F”) of Franco-Nevada Corporation with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, I consent to the references to my name, including under the heading “Experts,” and to the use of the technical report entitled “Technical Report for the Compañía Contractual Minera Candelaria and Compañía Contractual Contractual Minera Ojos del Salado Copper Projects, Atacama Province, Region III, Chile,” dated October 6, 2014 (the “Report”), and the information derived from the Report, included in the 2014 Annual Information Form of Franco-Nevada Corporation dated March 25, 2015 (the “AIF”), which is filed as an exhibit to, and incorporated by reference in, the Form 40-F.

 

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-190109), on Form S-8 (No. 333-176856) and on Form F-10 (No. 333-191835) of the references to my name in the AIF and the use of the Report and the information derived therefrom.

 

 
| DATED:   March 25, 2015 |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| *[Glen   Cole]*              |   |
| Name:   Glen Cole, PGeo      |   |

 
|   | **Local Offices:**

Saskatoon

Sudbury

Toronto

Vancouver

Yellowknife

** ** | **Group Offices:**

Africa

Asia

Australia

Europe

North America

South America |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Ronald C. Lundy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: November 10, 2006 By: /s/ Ronald C. Lundy     Ronald C. Lundy    Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer  
26
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,124]


Stanley Works; New Britain, CT; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 4, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by the Connecticut Rapid Response Coordinator on behalf 
of workers at Stanley Works, New Britain, Connecticut.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7137 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF AMENDED PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert Klein, Secretary, Treasurer, and the Chief Financial Officer of Avalon
Gold Corporation, a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, that:

(1) the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 19, 2004

/s/ Robert Klein
------------------
Robert Klein

Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Linda WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER06-615-038; ER08-1113-000]

On March 18, 2009, Modesto Irrigation District, Transmission Agency of Northern California, City of Redding, California, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, and the Turlock Irrigation District (Affected IBAA Entities) filed an Emergency Motion for Clarification and Requested for Shortened Response Time in the above-referenced proceeding. In their filing, the Affected IBAA Entities request a shortening of the date for filing a response to the motion, given the urgency of the clarification request. By this notice, the date for filing answers to the Affected IBAA Entities' motion for clarification shall be March 24, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-6873 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE
Jerel Denee KENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3530

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Robert Earl HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5219

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 384-385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Findings of Research Misconduct; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.

ACTION: Correction of notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error that appeared in the notice 
published in the November 27, 2017, Federal Register entitled 
``Findings of Research Misconduct.''

DATES: 
    Effective Date: January 3, 2018.
    Applicability Date: The correction notice is applicable for the 
Findings of

[[Page 385]]

Research Misconduct notice published on November 27, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen Gorirossi at 240-453-8800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In FR Doc. 2017-25549 of November 27, 2017 (82 FR 56042-56043), 
there was a referencing error involving incorrect citation of a paper 
in the notice. The error is identified and corrected in the Correction 
of Errors section below.

II. Correction of Errors

    In FR Doc. 2017-25549 of November 27, 2017 (82 FR 56042-56043), 
make the following corrections:
    1. On page 56042, third column, in FR Doc. 2017-25549, last 
paragraph, lines 16-26, and page 56043, first paragraph, lines 1-5, 
delete ``Respondent engaged in research misconduct at ESOM and 
falsified RT-PCR data on Excel spreadsheets in the research record and 
in a figure generated from the false data included in a manuscript 
submitted to and withdrawn from Scientific Reports (``Immipramine Blue 
Sensitively and Selectively Targets FLT3-ITD Positive Acute Myeloid 
Leukemia Cells.'' Scientific Reports 7(1):4447, 2017 June 30; 
doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04796-1. PMID: 28667329. Submitted to Scientific 
Reports [withdrawn]; hereafter referred to as the ``Scientific Reports 
manuscript'')'' and replace with the following text: ``Respondent 
engaged in research misconduct at ESOM and falsified RT-PCR data on 
Excel spreadsheets in the research record and in a figure generated 
from the false data included in an unpublished manuscript submitted to 
and withdrawn from Scientific Reports [withdrawn]; hereafter referred 
to as the ``Scientific Reports manuscript.'' ''
    2. On page 56043, first column, in FR Doc. 2017-25549, fourth 
paragraph (second bullet), lines 6-7, insert ``unpublished'' before 
``Scientific Reports'' so that the text reads: ``included false data in 
the unpublished Scientific Reports manuscript.''

    Dated: December 20, 2017.
Wanda K. Jones,
Interim Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2017-28409 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4150-31-P
Devin J. WHITFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1339

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
Elmer Edison BANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D15-4440

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ikaika KAIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2578

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14171-14172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0245; RI 20-120]


Proposed Information Collection; Request for Comments on an 
Existing Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of an existing 
information collection. This information collection, ``Request for 
Change to Unreduced Annuity'' (OMB Control No. 3206-0245; Form RI 20-
120), is designed to collect required information so that OPM may 
comply with the wishes of the retired Federal employee whose marriage 
has ended. This form will provide an organized way for the retiree to 
give us everything at one time.
    Comments are particularly invited on: Whether this information is 
necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Office of 
Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical utility; 
whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of 
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and 
methodology; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, through

[[Page 14172]]

the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.
    There are approximately 5,000 requests annually. This form takes an 
average of 30 minutes per response to complete. The annual burden is 
estimated to be 2,500 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-
4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#13506a6166603d51767d607c7d537c637e3d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95d6ece7e0e6bbd7f0fbe6fafbd5fae5f8bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
include a mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to: James K. Freiert, Deputy 
Assistant Director, Retirement Services Program, Center for Retirement 
and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E 
Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, 
Publications Team, RIS Support Services/Support Group, (202) 606-0623.

Kathie Ann Whipple,
Acting Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
 [FR Doc. E9-6928 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Ricky R. MCCULLOUGH, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 10, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40330 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**John Fontenot,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 728

- 11

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The attorney appointed to represent Defendant

- Appellant John
Fontenot moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). We have reviewed counsel’s b rief and the relevant

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
March 15, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40330 Document: 00516240178 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2022No. 21

- 40330

2 portions of the record reflected therein

. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal present s no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
**DISMISSED**

. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 21-40330 Document: 00516240178 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/15/2022
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10200 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GERALD STONE, Individually, Also Known as Ranscott Construction, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:07-CV-1632

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * According to his notice ofappeal, Gerald Stone appeals “from the order of the District Court, dated February 19, 2008, wherein the Court, in granting the United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-10200

2 Government’s motion toquash certain writsofgarnishment, stated that theother writs ofgarnishment, which were the subject ofAppellant’s motion to quash, would continue in force and effect.” This court sent both parties a notice directing them to brief the issue “[w]hether the order granting the motion to quash writs ofgarnishment entered on February 20, 2008, from which appeal is taken, is appealable at this stage of the litigation pursuant to R. 54(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., or the collateral order doctrine, or whether there exists some other basis ofappellate jurisdiction. See generally 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(a), (b).” Stone did not address this issue in his opening brief. In its brief, the government presented approximately five pages ofexplication as towhy we have no jurisdiction at this time. Stone did not file a reply brief. As the appellant, Stone has the obligation toshowjurisdiction. Moreover, the government is correct that, for the reasons it gives, the order designated in the noticeofappeal is not a final, appealable order. As the government explains, “Stone appears to have filed the appeal based on a misunderstanding ofthe difference between the effectiveness ofa writ [ofgarnishment] and the final disposition order in a garnishment action
. . . . Because all issues in the garnishment action have not been resolved, the order on appeal is not a final order, and there is no appellate jurisdiction under section 1291.” Stone is not put in jeopardy by the dismissal ofthe appeal. As the government helpfully pointsout, “Theorder appealed wasentered asa procedural matter to dismiss those garnishees that did not hold any funds
. . . . Stone may appeal this order, ifhe chooses, after a final disposition order is entered in the district court.” The appeal is DISMISSED for want of appellate jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         460,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               655,323
<PP&E>                                      13,010,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,666,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,673,125
<BONDS>                                      1,789,944
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    646,500
<COMMON>                                    23,146,694
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,590,148)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,666,115
<SALES>                                      1,521,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,521,717
<CGS>                                          972,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  972,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               877,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   392,730
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 b)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:      August 4, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Juan J. RománJuan J. RománVice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer  50