alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 664 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 664

Recognizing the 25th Army Corps of the Union Army and thanking them for 
   their role in capturing Galveston, Texas, on June 5th, 1865, and 
                liberating thousands of enslaved people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 25, 2023

   Mr. Green of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the 25th Army Corps of the Union Army and thanking them for 
   their role in capturing Galveston, Texas, on June 5th, 1865, and 
                liberating thousands of enslaved people.

Whereas this resolution may be cited as the ``Original Resolution Honoring the 
        25th Army Corps'';
Whereas the 25th Army Corps was the largest unit of African Americans in the 
        Union Army during the Civil War, comprised of more than 1,000 soldiers;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps captured Galveston, Texas, on June 5, 1865, a week 
        before General Gordon Granger's arrival on June 19, 1865;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps chased the rebel government and soldiers of Texas 
        into Mexico and spread the word about freedom, liberating thousands of 
        enslaved people in Texas before the arrival of General Granger;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps were the first unit to occupy the former capital of 
        the Confederacy, Richmond, Virginia, on April 3, 1864;
Whereas the members of the 25th Army Corps, who were previously held in the 
        bondage of slavery, not only emancipated enslaved persons in Galveston, 
        they also released Union soldiers and enslaved persons taken captive by 
        the Confederate Army;
Whereas the soldiers of the 25th Army Corps, through their actions and 
        sacrifices, brought a crucial victory for the Union and played an 
        indispensable role in the struggle for human rights, contributing to the 
        abolition of slavery;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps not only waged war against the Confederacy but also 
        waged a significant battle against racial prejudice and discrimination 
        across the Nation; and
Whereas the legacy of the 25th Army Corps continues to inspire subsequent 
        generations, instilling the values of courage, freedom, and justice and 
        reminding us of our shared humanity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and thanks 
the 25th Army Corps of the Union Army for their role in capturing 
Galveston, Texas, on June 5, 1865, and liberating thousands of enslaved 
people days prior to the arrival of General Gordon Granger on June 19, 
1865.
                                 <all>
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              [BLANK]
<PERIOD-START>                                 [BLANK]
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         614,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,099,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                   156,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,822,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,854,542
<PP&E>                                       3,279,928
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,251,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,691,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,770,804
<BONDS>                                     81,970,561
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,500
<COMMON>                                       811,015
<OTHER-SE>                                (77,262,888)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,691,323
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,239,026
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,947,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,496,752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               288,731
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,496,752
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,205,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,708,302)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,205,054)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32
----------




                           CERTIFICATIONS OF
          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
       PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       ---------------------------------------------------------



     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of JMB/245 PARK
AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LTD.





By: /s/  Patrick J. Meara         By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
    ----------------------            ----------------------------
    Patrick J. Meara                  Gailen J. Hull
    Chief Executive Officer           Chief Financial Officer and
                                      Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sealy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 27, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David J. McIlquham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James B. Hirshorn, Senior Executive Vice President,
Finance, Operations, Research and Development of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

October 11,
2006

| |  | /s/DAVID J. MCILQUHAMDavid J. McIlquham
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                                       
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/JAMES B. HIRSHORNJames B. Hirshorn
Senior Executive Vice President, Finance, Operations,
Research & Development
(Principal Accounting Officer)

---



QuickLinks
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keyon RAY, Appellant.

No. ED 106373

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: March 19, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Christian Lehmberg, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.

FOR RESPONDENT: Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

Keyon Ray ("Ray") appeals judgment entered upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, resisting arrest, and tampering with a motor vehicle following a jury trial in St. Louis County. Ray raises only one point on appeal. Ray argues the trial court erred or plainly erred when, during the State's cross-examination of him, it overruled the defense's continuing objection to speculation. Ray's objection was to a persistent line of questioning into the veracity and motive to lie of all witnesses, generally and individually (Ray included), based upon the inconsistency of his account with those of the State's witnesses. Ray argues the only purpose served by this line of questioning was to prejudice him.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not plainly err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for use of the parties setting forth the reasons for the decision.

Finding no clear error, we are constrained to affirm the judgment of the trial court on the record before us, under Rule 30.25(b).
Dominique Louise BRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
STATE of Louisiana v. Cornelius WILSON

NO. 2017-KO-0392

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

Denied; moot. See State v. Wilson, 17-0392 (La. 11/13/17), 229 So.3d 924.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY ITS REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000746967
<NAME> DALECO RESOURCES CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         212,457
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,021,197
<PP&E>                                       7,305,720
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,225,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,165,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,729,269
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,855,225
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,165,033
<SALES>                                        602,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               775,017
<CGS>                                          573,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  573,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               551,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (368,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (368,540)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (368,540)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Emanuel JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Emanuel Johnson, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1401 No. SC17-1402

Supreme Court of Florida.

[February 2, 2018]

James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Mark S. Gruber and Julie A. Morley, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Timothy A. Freeland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Emanuel Johnson's appeals of the circuit court's order denying his motions filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Johnson's motions sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Johnson's appeals pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Johnson responded to this Court's orders to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in his cases.

After reviewing Johnson's responses to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Johnson is not entitled to relief. Johnson was sentenced to death for the murder of Iris White following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of eight to four. *Johnson v. State*, 660 So.2d 637, 641 (Fla. 1995). Johnson was also sentenced to death for the murder of Jackie McCahon following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of ten to two. *Johnson v. State*, 660 So.2d 648, 652 (Fla. 1995). Both of Johnson's sentences of death became final in 1996.

*234*Johnson v. Florida*, 517 U.S. 1159, 116 S.Ct. 1550, 1550, 134 L.Ed.2d 653 (1996) ; *Johnson v. Florida*, 517 U.S. 1159, 116 S.Ct. 1550, 1551, 134 L.Ed.2d 653 (1996). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Johnson's sentences of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Johnson's motions.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Johnson, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

QUINCE, J., recused.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Pratik Shah, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 23, 2015



/s/    Pratik
ShahPratik Shah, Ph.D.President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Thomas J. PRESLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81568

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: July 30, 2019

Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Christian Lehmberg, for Appellant.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

*865Thomas Presley appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cass County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 19, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 19, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0062. BELLA - JANE SCHANDORFF - COLES f/k/a JANE E. COLES v. CLEO P. COLES III.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 21A01907
Deanna Kathryn LARA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

No. 10-17-00326-CR

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Order issued and filed July 25, 2018

Julie L. Renken, Charles Karakashian Jr., Waco, for Appellee.

Christopher M. Dillon, for Appellant.

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM

In Trial Court Case No.15,026, appellant Deanna Kathryn Lara was convicted of three counts of Sexual Assault of a Child (Counts I, V, and VII) and five counts of Improper Relationship between Educator and Student (Counts II, III, IV, VI, and VIII). The jury assessed Lara's punishment at 10 years in prison for each count. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Eight judgments were signed, one for each count.

*432Lara filed one notice of appeal, showing her desire to appeal from "the judgment of conviction and sentence" rendered against her in Trial Court Case No. "15,026-Counts 1-8." The appeal therefore bears one case number, Court of Appeals No. 10-17-00326-CR.

Lara's appointed appellate counsel filed a brief challenging only the judgment and sentence for Count IV. Because Lara did not challenge the judgment for Counts I through III and V through VIII, a brief bringing any alleged error or an *Anders* -type motion to withdraw and a supporting brief as to Counts I through III and V through VIII must be filed in this proceeding within 30 days from the date of this order. *See* *Anders v. California* , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). If counsel files a motion to withdraw, counsel should also file a motion to sever as to any or all counts as to which the motion applies. *See* *Kirven v. State* , No. 10-14-00122-CR (Tex. App.-Waco Oct. 22, 2015, order) (not designated for publication). *See also* *Loredo v. State* , No. 10-15-00322-CR (Tex. App-Waco Apr. 21, 2016, order) (not designated for publication); *Keene v. State* , No. 10-15-00389-CR (Tex. App.-Waco Feb. 15, 2017, order) (not designated for publication).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 818 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 818

    Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2023, as 
            ``Honoring the Nation's First Responders Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2023

     Ms. DeLauro (for herself, Mrs. Cammack, Mr. Courtney, and Mr. 
Fitzpatrick) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2023, as 
            ``Honoring the Nation's First Responders Day''.

Whereas first responders include professional and volunteer fire, police, 
        emergency medical technician, and paramedic workers in the United 
        States;
Whereas, according to a 2017 compilation of data on the Emergency Services 
        Sector in the United States by the Department of Homeland Security, 
        ``The first responder community comprises an estimated 4.6 million 
        career and volunteer professionals within five primary disciplines: Law 
        Enforcement, Fire and Rescue Services, Emergency Medical Services, 
        Emergency Management, and Public Works.'';
Whereas first responders deserve to be recognized for their commitment to 
        safety, defense, and honor; and
Whereas October 28, 2023, would be an appropriate day to establish as ``Honoring 
        the Nation's First Responders Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Honoring the Nation's 
        First Responders Day'';
            (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of first 
        responders; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        Honoring the Nation's First Responders Day with appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities that promote awareness of the 
        contributions of first responders in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Timothy L. WALDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0822

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Jason MIZELL v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2169

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WASHINGTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We attach hereto and make a part hereof the district court's written reasons denying relief.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a *548second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Attachment
Ray SCHREINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1174

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.