alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,130]


Leggett and Platt, Inc.; Simpsonville, KY; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on February 5, 2009 in response 
to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Leggett and Platt, Inc., Simpsonville, Kentucky.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7138 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BOBBY L. MAGWOOD, ) DOC #023111, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1879 ) JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, ) DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 21, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Donald G. Jacobsen, Judge. Bobby L. Magwood, pro se. Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
EX PARTE Arthur L. SIMON

CR-16-0013

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Tajhon Boderick WILSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1593

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT GIACOMO CAMPIONE, ) ) Appellant, ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2437 ) LARRY S. SAZANT, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 11, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court Charlotte County; Lisa Porter, Judge. Joseph C. Lotempio of The Dellutri Law Group, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant. Patrick Patrissi and Bruce J. Smoler, of Smoler & Associates, P.A. Hollywood, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and, BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
STATE EX REL. Preston NELSON v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-1725

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel of under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction *544procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 11

                              CRYSTAL OIL COMPANY

           COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER COMMON SHARE (In Thousands Except
                          Share and Per Share Amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended
                                                     March 31
                                           ----------------------------
                                               1998             1997
                                           -----------      -----------
<S>                                        <C>              <C>        
Earnings per common share
  Net income                               $       595      $       814
                                           ===========      ===========

  Weighted average of common
    shares outstanding                       2,668,122        2,665,622
                                           ===========      ===========

  Earnings per common share                $       .22      $       .31
                                           ===========      ===========


Earnings per common share -
  Assuming dilution
  Income from operations                   $       595      $       814
  Adjustments to income
    (net of income tax)                              -                -
                                           -----------      -----------
  Adjusted net income                      $       595      $       814
                                           ===========      ===========

  Weighted average of common 
    and common equivalent shares:
      Outstanding                            2,668,122        2,665,622
      Assuming conversion or exercise of:
        Stock options, net of
          treasury shares                       40,408           30,585
        Senior preferred stock                  33,274           33,274
                                           -----------      -----------
                                             2,741,804        2,729,481
                                           ===========      ===========

  Earnings per common share -
    Assuming dilution                      $       .22      $       .30
                                           ===========      ===========

</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00451-CR

Edward Salcedo

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-CR-2335-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 19, 2015
SERVED NOVEMBER 23, 201Q,ep;^r^y|^£j,|j QF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIQKrf OPERATIONS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ,^..r^ ,,ny 23 p 2- U2 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FLIGHTSTAR AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNO. FAA-2010-1076 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2008-GL-05-0042) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, 

and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ttotaiie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law/ 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10GL0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel | 

The Aviation Law Firm I 

One Research Court, Suite 450 | 

Rockville, MD 20850 i 

TEL: 301-294-8550 | 

FAX: 301-294-2525 j 

i 

Glerm L. Brown, Complainant's Counsel | 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Feder^ Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines, IL60018 

TEL: 847-294-7063 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Stephan JEAN-FELIX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-0070

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Khalid Hyat CHAUDHRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-0680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 13, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Amos SNOWDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Marcus Perry RICHMOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
L.H., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 18, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Title : (^fC^'lVb l ^ ' ' W/ ( \ l \/\['^J^ i

Wit hrespec t t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e recrement s o f sectio n 6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee nmet i naccordanc e wit

hth e followin g [initial appropriat e line] :

Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio nan d Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio ni s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review ; Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t for th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O ( § 801 ) hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

Thi s documen t

i s no t afinal rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . Th e documen t

ha s bee nsubmitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio nt o Congres s an dGAO .

Nam e / , Title/Offic e ( '
Ronald MAXIE, Jr. v. CITY OF MOBILE

CR-15-0770

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alan J. Houston, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 880]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), rendered December 15, 1999, convicting him of arson in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
----

----

III Informazioni

Agenzia europea per i medicinali

----

ASSUNZIONI PER L'AGENZIA EUROPEA PER I MEDICINALI (LONDRA)

(2005/C 227 A/01)

L'Agenzia ha la responsabilità di coordinare la valutazione e la vigilanza dei medicinali per uso umano e veterinario in tutto il territorio dell'Unione europea [cfr. regolamento (CE) n. 726/2004 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio (GU L 136 del 30.4.2004, pag. 1)]. L'EMEA è stata istituita nel gennaio 1995 e lavora a stretto contatto con la Commissione europea, i 25 Stati membri dell'Unione europea, i paesi SEE-EFTA e molti altri gruppi del settore pubblico e privato.

Ulteriori informazioni sull'EMEA e le sue attività sono disponibili direttamente su Internet, al seguente indirizzo web: http://www.emea.eu.int

L'Agenzia europea per i medicinali indice una serie di procedure di selezione al fine di costituire elenchi di idonei per i seguenti posti:

I candidati prescelti saranno iscritti in un elenco di idonei e, a seconda delle disponibilità di bilancio, potranno ricevere un'offerta di contratto quinquennale rinnovabile alle condizioni di impiego degli altri agenti delle Comunità europee (Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europeeL 56 del 4 marzo 1968).

La sede di lavoro è Londra.

I candidati devono essere cittadini di uno degli Stati membri delle Comunità europee oppure dell'Islanda, della Norvegia o del Liechtenstein, e godere dei diritti politici.

L'elenco completo delle condizioni, la descrizione dei posti e l'atto di candidatura da utilizzare vanno scaricati dal sito web dell'EMEA all'indirizzo http://www.emea.eu.int. L'atto di candidatura deve essere debitamente firmato e datato e, unitamente ai documenti giustificativi, deve essere inviato entro e non oltre il 28 ottobre 2005 (fa fede il timbro postale) al seguente indirizzo:EMEA — Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, UK-London E14 4HB [Tel. (44-207) 18 84 00; fax (44-207) 18 84 16].

In futuro la Gazzetta ufficiale non sarà più inviata automaticamente con la mailing list. Chi desidera essere informato delle pubblicazioni è pregato di iscriversi on line all'indirizzo http://www.emea.eu.int alla voce «Online Mailing Service».

----

Rettifiche

----

Rettifica dei seguenti bandi di concorso:

(Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea C 178 A del 20 luglio 2005)

(2005/C 227 A/02)

Alle pagine 19 e 35, al titolo D, comma 6, viene aggiunto quanto segue:

«L'articolo 29, paragrafo 1, lettera b), dello statuto dei funzionari delle Comunità europee contempla la possibilità per i funzionari di presentare domanda di trasferimento in un'altra istituzione o agenzia in qualsiasi momento della carriera. Si richiama tuttavia l'attenzione dei candidati sul fatto che, in considerazione dell'interesse del servizio, il trasferimento di funzionari neoassunti, prima del decorso del periodo di tre anni dall'entrata in servizio, è possibile solo in casi eccezionali e per motivi debitamente giustificati, previo accordo dell'istituzione o agenzia di origine e dell'istituzione o agenzia di accoglienza.»

----
Atravion Jaquon VIRGIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2622

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 813 

Supporting the designation of October 23, 2023, as ‘‘AADC Deficiency 

Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself and Mr. LYNCH) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of October 23, 2023, as ‘‘AADC 

Deficiency Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas a rare disease is a disease or disorder that affects 

a small number of patients, currently defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 people in the United 

States at any given time; 

Whereas there are more than 7,000 rare diseases that altogether affect an estimated 25,000,000 to 30,000,000 

Americans; 

Whereas children make up more than half of the estimated 

25,000,000 to 30,000,000 Americans living with a rare 

disease; 

Whereas Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC) Deficiency is a genetic neurologic rare disease that severely 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 813 IH 

debilitates a patient’s development, motor skills, growth, 

and cognitive and language skills and limits a patient’s 

life; 

Whereas AADC Deficiency results from an inherited genetic 

disease where patients lack the AADC enzyme required 

to create dopamine and, without dopamine, patients will 

never achieve motor milestones, such as holding their 

heads up, sitting, and standing, or develop the ability to 

communicate or perform basic life functions; 

Whereas patients are diagnosed with AADC Deficiency 

through genetic and other biochemical tests; 

Whereas patients suffering from AADC Deficiency often have 

unexplained low muscle tone and experience other symptoms like developmental delays and involuntary eye movements; 

Whereas there have been approximately 200 cases of AADC 

Deficiency reported worldwide; 

Whereas AADC Deficiency is often mistaken for other diseases like cerebral palsy, epilepsy, or even autism; 

Whereas Congress can raise awareness of AADC Deficiency 

in the public and medical community in the United 

States; 

Whereas awareness of AADC Deficiency will help patients 

who may be experiencing the symptoms of AADC Deficiency recognize their disease and pursue appropriate 

treatment; and 

Whereas improved awareness and education around AADC 

Deficiency will increase medical representation for individuals suffering from AADC Deficiency: Now, therefore, 

be it 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 813 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘AADC Defi3 ciency Awareness Day’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of, with respect 

5 to Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC) 

6 Deficiency, improving awareness and education 

7 around AADC Deficiency. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Justin Devon DIGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-697

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Es 

. 

kr 

L OFFiCE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL 

AUSTIN 

:Lw 

, II"0 

,. I-mlsI 1uNa Honorable Foster Davis 

January 13, 

County Attorney 

Foerd County 

Crowell, Texas 

Dear Xr. Davis: 

Re: 

Tax to Rur 

This will acknow 

aation of January 11, 19 

Whether or not a 

to a rebate of Fe 

ror opeimf0n or, 

t is entitled 

gasoline wed 

or sald.school 

et 

v 

your httention is 

te Bevenue Aot’ot the 

of 934, as the same 1s 

86, U.S.C.A. thrdugh 437, 

ug Title 26, Chapter 1481, 

he above described item, 

volume above refersea to, 

lion is imposed on gasoline 

rter thereof, except in ree Commissioner with the aptax shall n& apply in the 

gasoline. 

ot fin% that there is wlthln the Aot 

ther than where the gasoline is sold to 

However, you are advised that any opinion by 

the Attorney General of' Texas regarding this law would 

be beyond the scope of the authority ~of the Attorney 

Caneral of Texcis, as to auny oifiaer or the Fe%eral GOYernment being boubd, an% you are respectfully requested 

. to consult the proper tax authorities of the Federal 

government relating to the interpretation of thSs Act 
Ron. Foster Davis, January 13, 1939, Page 2 

of Congress and application of the law. 

Fe regret very much that we are unable to 

advise you, other than is herein above set out, and 

we hope that we have been of some service to you in 

this respect by the pointing out of the law. 

Your8 very truly
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Greg Holsted  Greg Holsted, Chief Financial Officer  Date:  July 24, 2008
Billy C. BOWEN v. STATE

CR-15-1304

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
The Attorney General of Texas 

January 28, 1980 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General 

Honorable Albert Brown, Chairman 

Committee on Constitutional 

Amendments 

House of Representatives 

Austin, Texas 

Opinion No. NW-132 

Re: Whether the competitive 

bidding requirements of article 

23684 V.T.C.S., apply to housing 

authorities. 

Dear Representative Brown: 

You ask whether article 2368a, V.T.C.S., applies to housing authorities. 

Article 2368a, V.T.C.S., requires cities and counties to let certain contracts 

on competitive bids and sets out notice requirements. A housing authority is 

created in each city by article 1269k, V.T.C.S. It may not exercise its 

powers unless the governing body of the city declares a need for it to 

function. Article 1269k, V.T.C.S., does not include sny requirement of 

competitive bidding. 

Texas courts have stated that a housing authority is a division of the 

city within which it exists. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Glidden 

a, 283 S.W.2d 440 (Tex.x 

rounds 291 S.W.2d 315 (Tex. 1956); 

if--- 

M&s v. Housimz Autho&y 

.W.2d 487 (Tex. Civ. App. - Daii~~ . 

266 S.W.2d 842 (Tex. 1954). Miers v.‘Hx 

involved the condemnation of land by 

that article 3268, V.T.C.S., exempting m<nicipal corporations from 

depositing twice the condemnation award snd making bond, applied to the 

housing authority. 

Neither court discussed the following provision of article l269k, 

V.T.C.S.: 

. . . No provisions of law with respect to the 

acquisition, operation, or disposition of property by 

other public bodies shall be applicable to sn authority 

unless the Legislature shall specifically so state. 

Sec. 8th). This provision was noted in Attorney General Opinion C-760 

(1966), which held that the surplus property of a county housing authority 

P. 423 
Honorable Albert Brown - Page Two (NW-132) 

must be sold in accordance with the requirements of article 1577, V.T.C.S. The opinion 

stated ss follows: 

Just as the Housing Authorities may receive the benefit of statutes 

applying to cities and counties, so they must comply with the 

statutes applying to cities and counties where such statutes do not 

conflict with the powers granted to them in Article 1269k. 

Based on this opinion and the opinions of the Texas courts, we conclude that article 2368a, 

V.T.C.S., applies to housing authorities as divisions of cities. See also Acts 1979, 66th 

Leg., ch 770, at 1901 (to be codified as V.T.C.S. art. 2368a.3jBnal competitive 

bidding requirements for housing authorities). 

SUMMARY 

Housing authorities are subject to the competitive bidding requirements of article 2368a, V.T.C.S. 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

TED L. HARTLEY 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Susan Garrison 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

Jim Allison 

David B. Brooks 

Walter Davis 

Bob Gammage 

Susan Garrison 

Rick Gilpin 

Bruce Youngblood 

P. 424