alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of N1 Liquidating Trust (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Frank V. Saracino, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 By:/s/ Frank V. SaracinoFrank V. SaracinoChief Financial OfficerDate:March 30, 2020
 
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TSG INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

ARCH INSURANCE 

COMPANY AND THE 

AUCHTER COMPANY,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1359

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 25, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Harvey L. Jay, Judge.

Leo H. Meirose, Jr. of Meirose & Associates, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Tammy N. Giroux and Duane A. Daiker of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, 

Tampa; Christopher J. Mueller and Rhonda B. Boggess, Jacksonville, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of TreeCon Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: July 22, 2004 |  | By: |  | /S/ Mike Boatman                                                                     
|                     |  |     |  | Mike Boatman                                                                         
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and principal financial officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Resource Exchange of America Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dana J. Pekas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Dana J. Pekas By: Dana J. Pekas Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  Dated: April 15, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Zenaida A. Reyes-Arguelles, M.D., as Assignee of Stephan Noel, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Omni Indemnity Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Freiberg, Peck &amp; Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang, Esq.), for appellant.The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered September 29, 2014. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court denying defendant's motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had not issued an insurance policy covering the subject loss and, thus, that plaintiff had sued the wrong insurer.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <a href="../2015/2015_51294.htm" target="_blank"><i>Tam Med. Supply Corp. v Omni Indem. Co.</i> (48 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51294[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 08, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 451 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 451

Recognizing the need for greater access to rural and agricultural media 
                              programming.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2023

 Mr. Posey (for himself, Ms. Pettersen, Mr. LaMalfa, and Ms. Caraveo) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                             on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the need for greater access to rural and agricultural media 
                              programming.

Whereas individuals living in rural areas in the United States need access to 
        media content that is relevant to their daily lives;
Whereas rural and agricultural programming includes agricultural weather, 
        agribusiness news, commodity market news, and western sports, and this 
        programming is important to the farmers and ranchers of the United 
        States for their way of life and making a living;
Whereas rural and agricultural programming covers matters that affect all 
        individuals in the United States;
Whereas all individuals in the United States need to be exposed to, and informed 
        about, what is occurring outside of the major cities and suburbs of the 
        United States;
Whereas all individuals in the United States feel the effects of inflation and 
        supply chain shortages, and rural and agricultural programming is in a 
        unique position to inform viewers of the roots of these issues;
Whereas the population of the world is projected to grow from 7,000,000,000 to 
        approximately 9,000,000,000 by 2050, and agricultural productivity will 
        need to increase to meet the growing demand for food and the projected 
        increase in consumption;
Whereas a decrease in investment in agricultural research and development would 
        result in a negative shock to agricultural productivity;
Whereas an informed public is key to supporting the proper level of investment 
        in agricultural research and development;
Whereas significant consolidation in the media market and prioritization of 
        consolidated media has had a negative impact on access to rural and 
        agricultural programming; and
Whereas multichannel video programming distributors and providers of digital and 
        streaming media should make delivery of rural and agricultural 
        programming, including agricultural news and western lifestyle content, 
        a priority: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the 
importance of rural and agricultural programming and the need for 
greater access to rural and agricultural media programming.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. § 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Franco-Nevada Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sandip Rana, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 25,   2015 |                      |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                                   |                      |
|                                   | /s/   Sandip Rana         |
|                                   | Sandip   Rana             |
|                                   | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the three month period ending March 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                            624,692
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    626,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                   (115,722,252)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      626,084
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  176,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              2,388,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (4,302,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (4,302,868)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (4,302,868)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (7,099.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (7,099.73)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP03-302-005; Docket No. CP04-345-003]

Take notice that on March 9, 2009, Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline Company, LLC (Cheyenne Plains) filed an updated cost and revenue study in response to the Commission's January 30, 2009 data request.

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to                           ( print page 13430)                        receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time Thursday, April 2, 2009.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-6875 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 674 

Expressing support for the designation of September 22 as ‘‘National Military 

and Veterans Suicide Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2023 

Mr. SELF submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 22 as 

‘‘National Military and Veterans Suicide Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas the members of the United States Armed Forces 

and veterans have selflessly served and sacrificed to defend the Nation’s freedom and security; 

Whereas the mental health and well-being of military personnel and veterans are vital components of their overall 

readiness and ability to lead fulfilling lives; 

Whereas the persistent challenges of post-traumatic stress, 

depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues contribute to an alarming rate of suicide within the military 

and veteran populations; 

Whereas it is our duty to raise awareness about the struggles 

faced by military members and veterans, combat the stigVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:57 Sep 09, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR674.IH HR674

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 674 IH 

ma surrounding mental health, and foster an environment that encourages seeking help; 

Whereas designating a specific day for national awareness 

can bring attention to the importance of providing adequate mental health support and resources to military 

personnel and veterans; 

Whereas September is recognized as Suicide Prevention 

Awareness Month, providing an opportune time to focus 

on the unique challenges faced by those who have served 

the Nation; and 

Whereas we recognize September 22 as National Military and 

Veterans Suicide Awareness Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of a ‘‘National Military and Veterans Sui3 cide Awareness Day’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Sylvia Hall AGARO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-585

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is made as of this 17th day of December, 2007, by and between R. William Petty, M.D. (“Executive”), and Exactech, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”). 
 Recitals 
 WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated December 20, 2002, (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to revise the term of the Employment Agreement to expressly provide for the continuation of such term pending renegotiation of a
new employment agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Section 2.1 of the Employment
Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 2.1 in its entirety and substituting therefor a new Section 2.1 to read as follows: 
 “2.1 Employment and Term. The Company shall employ the Executive and the Executive shall serve the Company, on the terms and conditions set forth herein, for the period commencing January 1, 2003 (the “Effective
Date”) and expiring February 28, 2008 (the “Term”), unless extended or sooner terminated as hereinafter set forth. ” 
 2. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement is and remains unmodified and in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 3. This Amendment shall be deemed a contract made under the laws of the State of Florida and for all purposes shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of such State applicable to contracts made
and to be performed entirely within such State. 
 4. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for
all purposes be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 
 [REMAINDER OF PAGE
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the
date first written above. 
  

							
	ADDRESS:	 		 	THE COMPANY:
			
	c/o Exactech, Inc.	 		 	EXACTECH
	2320 N.W. 66th Court	 		 		 	
	Gainesville, Florida 32653	 		 		 	
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ William B. Locander

		 		 	Name:	 	William B. Locander, Ph.D.
		 		 	Title:	 	Compensation Committee Chairman
			
	ADDRESS:	 		 	THE EXECUTIVE:
			
	c/o Exactech, Inc.	 		 	
	2320 N.W. 66th Court	 		 		 	 /s/ R. William Petty

	Gainesville, Florida 32653	 		 	Name:	 	R. William Petty, M.D.

  

 2
Rodney MCGEE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5100

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000747952
<NAME> BIOMATRIX, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,363,275
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,096,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,500
<INVENTORY>                                  3,550,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,897,449
<PP&E>                                      28,690,638
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,484,938)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,936,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,572,308
<BONDS>                                      5,773,711
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    61,350,198
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,561,053)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,936,058
<SALES>                                      4,565,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,498,408
<CGS>                                        1,514,495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,584,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,179,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                   375,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            804,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   804,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
Luis A. SORO, Appellant, v. The KEYES COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2547

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Clinton CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1428

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.