alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to                               ( print page 407)                            the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 3, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 405 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-100, CP2018-142.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-28362 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Manuel HERNANDEZ-MONTESINO, Appellant.

WD 80946

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: August 20, 2019

Heath A. Stuart, Leawood, KS for appellant.

Robert J. Barthjolomew, Jr., Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Gary D. Witt, Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam

Following a jury trial, Manuel Hernandez-Montesino appeals from his conviction on one count of second-degree domestic assault. He contends the circuit court erred in prohibiting defense counsel from making comments during closing arguments about the State's failure to present certain evidence at trial. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the *930parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Rule 30.25(b).
### SPA 28

Checklist 215 ] [Printed: 6/21/10 ] 

### July 28, 2006

- Page 1 of 2 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 215 Cathode Ray

Tubes Rule 71 FR 42928

- 42949 July 28, 2006 (RCRA Cluster XVII , HSWA) Name of State: Washington State Statutory Authority: Chapter 70.105 RCW Title of Regulations: Chapter 173

- 303 WAC Effective Date: November 5, 2007 Date Checklist Completed: May 10, 2010

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS: EQUIV

ALENT LESS

STRIN

GENT MORE

STRIN

GENT BROADER IN

SCOPE PART 260

—HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL SUBPART B DEFINITIONS † DEFINITIONS add “Cathode ray tube” 260.10 040 X

add “CRT collector” 260.10 040 The state’ s definition is mo re stringent because it requires all three categories of CRTs (intact, used and broken) to be managed under state standards that are equivalent to 261.39 standards for used and broken CRTs. X

add “CRT glass manufacturer” 260.10 040 X add “CRT processing” 260.10 040 X

PART 261

—IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SUBPART A GENERAL † EXCLUSIONS add paragraph : Used, intact CRTs as defined in §260.10 of this chapter are not solid wa stes within the United States unless they are disposed, or unless they are speculatively accumulated as defined in §261.1(c)(8) by CRT collectors or glass processors. 261.4(a)(22)(i)
No analog

Used, intact CRTs as defined in § 260.10 of this chapter are not solid wa stes when exported for recycling provided that they meet the requirements of § 261.40. 261.4(a)(22)(ii) No analog

### RCRA REVI SION CHECKLIS T 215: Cathode Ray Tubes Rule (cont’ d) SPA 28

Checklist 215 [Printed: 6/21/10 ] 

### July 28, 2006

- Page 2 of 2 FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS: EQUIV

ALENT LESS

STRIN

GENT MORE

STRIN

GENT BROADER IN

SCOPE Used, broken CRTs as defined in § 260.10 of this chapter are not solid wa stes provided that they meet the requirements of § 261.39. 261.4(a)(22)(iii) No analog
Glass removed from CRTs is not a solid waste provided that it meets the requirements of § 261.39(c). 261.4(a)(22)(iv) No analog † SUBPART E EXCLUSIONS/EXEMPTIONS Section 261.38 is moved from Subpart D to S ubpart E 261.38 No analog The state has not adopted the comparable/Syngas fuel exclusion. X

Conditional Exclusion for Used, Broken Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) and Processed CRT Glass Undergoing Recycling. 261.39 071(3)(oo) (i)

- (iv) The state rule is more stringent because we require all three categories of CRTs ( intact, used and broken) to be managed under state standards that are equivalent to 261.39 standards for used and broken CRTs. X

Conditional Exclusion for Used, Intact Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) Exported for Recycling. 261.40 No analog X Notification and Recordkeeping for Used, Intact Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) Exported for Reuse. 261.41 No analog X † Optional Provisions
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Kof Buka Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ritesh Chandra Singh, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Date: March 8, 2011
 
 RITESH CHANDRA SINGH
 Ritesh Chandra Singh
 Chief Executive Officer,
 President and Director
 
 
 
 
 -1-
Exhibit 13.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Dragon Jade International Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lai Yat Man, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





July 30, 2015/s/ Lai Yat ManName:
Lai Yat ManTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
----

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.3696 — E.ON/MOL)

(2005/C 174/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 July 2005, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference COMP/M.3696 — E.ON/MOL, to the following address:

----
Exhibit 13.1




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to


Title
18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, K.M.
Wong, Chief Executive Officer of Dragon Jade International Limited (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




The
annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)); and




The
information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  November
11, 2009





/s/ K.M.
Wong





K.M.
Wong, Chief Executive Officer
Luis ARDILA-CALDERON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1673

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 01, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of U. S. Natural Nutrients & Minerals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 30, 2010  /s/ James Harrison James Harrison Principal Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U. S. NATURAL NUTRIENTS & MINERALS, INC. and will be retained by U. S. NATURAL NUTRIENTS & MINERALS, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Phone (248) 203-0080
                                                              Fax (248) 281-0940
                                                30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175
                                                    Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586
                                                                  www.sucpas.com


March 15, 2010


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
Mayetok, Inc.
Portland, OR

To Whom It May Concern:

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual
Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed
by Mayetok, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2010, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Mayetok, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of
and for the periods ending November 30, 2009 and 2008.

Sincerely,


/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
----------------------------------
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Shotgun Energy Corporation (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended March 31, 2008  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.
Sean SPENCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cognos Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Robert G. Ashe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Tom Manley, Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |                                                                                                                                                      
|--------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|January 3, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert G. Ashe                                                                                                                                   
|Date            |  | Robert G. Ashe, President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                
|                | 
|January 3, 2007 |  | /s/ Tom Manley                                                                                                                                       
|Date            |  | Tom Manley Senior
Vice President, Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting     Officer)

This certification is being submitted solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor will the
certification be deemed incorporated by reference in to any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.



92
Gary LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1442

Supreme Court of Florida.

[February 2, 2018]

Robert S. Friedman, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Stacy R. Biggart, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Northern Region, Tallahassee, Florida; and Billy H. Nolas, Chief, Capital Habeas Unit, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Gary Lawrence's appeal of the circuit court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Lawrence's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida*, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Lawrence's appeal pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock*, Lawrence responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Lawrence's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Lawrence is not entitled to relief. Lawrence was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of nine to three.

*241*Lawrence v. State*, 698 So.2d 1219, 1221 (Fla. 1997). His sentence of death became final in 1998. *Lawrence v. Florida*, 522 U.S. 1080, 118 S.Ct. 863, 139 L.Ed.2d 761 (1998). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Lawrence's sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock*, 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Lawrence's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Lawrence, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State*, 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied*, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock*.
Jason Ray BENNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2514

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

 I, Robert Waters, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Precise Life Sciences Ltd., a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

 (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d));

 and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 Dated: May 20, 2003

/s/ Robert Waters
--------------
Robert Waters
President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                                 ADDENDUM NO. 1

                                     TO THE

                        QUOTA SHARE REINSURANCE AGREEMENT
                           DATED AS OF MARCH 27, 2003

              (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "ORIGINAL AGREEMENT")

                                     BETWEEN

                            PLATINUM RE (UK) LIMITED

                   (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "COMPANY")

                                       AND

                       PLATINUM UNDERWRITERS BERMUDA, LTD

                  (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "REINSURER")

WHEREAS, the Reinsurer and the Company are parties to the Original Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, effective April 1, 2003, the parties hereto hereby agree to amend
the Original Agreement as follows:

      Addendum A - The first and only paragraph shall be deleted in its entirety
      and replaced with the following:

      "1.   25% Quota Share of Business classified by the Retrocedant as
            International Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Business arising
            out of the Retrocedants participation in programmes from Cedant's
            domiciled in the United Kingdom and Eire.

      2.    Property Catastrophe Excess of loss treaty $40,000,000 excess of
            $50,000,000 any one occurrence between the Company and Platinum
            Underwriters Re, Inc."

All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement remain unchanged.

                                                                     Page 1 of 2

<PAGE>

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Addendum No.1 to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives.

                                            Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd.

                                            By: /s/ Francois Bertrand
                                                -----------------------------
                                            Name: Francois Bertrand
                                            Title: Senior Vice President

                                            Platinum Re (UK) Limited

                                            By: /s/ Robert S. Porter
                                                -----------------------------
                                            Name: Robert S. Porter
                                            Title: Managing Director

                                                                     Page 2 of 2
Joseph Leroy JONES-EL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et. al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1236

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Doris Rich CORYA, individually; Paul J. Rich Sanders, individually; Doris Corya and Paul J. Rich Sanders, as Co-Trustees of the Trust Under Will of Eleanor M. Rich dated June 10, 1964; and Doris Rich Corya, as Trustee of The Sanders Trust dated October 6, 1953, Revocable Trust of John P. Corya dated October 11, 1993 and Irrevocable Trust of John P. Corya dated October 11, 1993, Appellants, v. Roy SANDERS, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-414 4D16-441 4D16-1716

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 5, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128664 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128664 

 COA: 252193 

Wayne CC: 03-003588-01 

MICHAEL JONES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

l1128 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 5, 2005 

Clerk