alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10a.htm


    Exhibit
      10(a)

     

     

     

     

    WALGREEN
      CO. SECTION 162(m) DEFERRED
      COMPENSATION PLAN

    


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 2

    (Effective
      as of January 1,
      2008)

    


    


    1.           Section
      4.3 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

    


    
      	
               

            	
              4.3

            	
              Length
                of
                Deferral.  Compensation deferred under the terms of the
                Plan shall be deferred until the payment date described in Section
                4.4(b)
                below.

            


    

    


    


    2.           Section
      4.4(b) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

    


    
      	
               

            	
              (b)

            	
              Timing
                of
                Payment.  Payment of the Participant’s deferred
                Compensation amounts shall commence (or, in the case of lump-sum
                payments,
                shall be made) on or as soon as practicable after the Default Commencement
                Date.  The Default Commencement Date shall be January 15 of the
                fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the Participant has
                a
                termination of employment within the meaning of Code Section 409A,
                but in
                no event earlier than the date which is six months after such termination
                of employment.  A Participant may elect (on such form or forms
                provided by the Committee for such purpose) to defer commencement
                of
                payment to on or about January 15 of any future year, provided that
                payment must commence no later than the later
                of:

            


    

     

    
      
        	
                 

              	
                (i)

              	
                On
                  or about the five-year anniversary of the "Default Commencement
                  Date",
                  or

              


      

       

    

    
      	
               

            	
              (ii)

            	
              On
                or about the January 15th
                following
                the Participant’s 65th
                birthday.

            


    

    
 

    Any
      such
      deferral election must be made prior to the beginning of the Year or Years
      in
      which the deferred compensation subject to the election would otherwise be
      earned.
exv10w11



 





Exhibit 10.11




10. CONSENT TO SERVE:





I hereby consent to being named as a Director in a registration statement filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



* * *





I agree to notify the Company immediately on becoming aware of any changes in the foregoing
information and will endeavor to do so prior to my, any of my immediate family members or any
of my affiliates under my control directly or indirectly entering into any Relationship or
transaction that would require an affirmative response to any of the foregoing questions in
the future.



	 	 	 
	Dated October 27, 2007

	 	/s/ Carmine Falcone
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Signature of Director or Officer
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

February 14, 2005 Session

GARY FLANARY, et al. V. CARL GREGORY DODGE OF JOHNSON

CITY, LLC

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County

No. 34497 Hon. G. Richard Johnson, Chancellor

No. E2004-00620-COA-R3-CV - FILED MAY 31, 2005

OPINION, CONCURRING IN PART, AND DISSENTING IN PART

I concur with the majority opinion on all issues raised except the final issue of

enforceability of the contract, having only been signed by Flanary.

If Flanary were seeking to enforce the terms of the contract against the dealership

would the majority hold the contract unenforceable? I think not. The majority argues that prior to

the filing of this action there was no conduct on the part of the dealership to assent to the terms of

the agreement. Obviously, the dealership was aware of the agreement and took no actions to

repudiate the agreement. Clearly, silence can amount to assent. The majority further argues that the

dealership’s verbal assent does not count because the expression was not made until suit was filed.

There was simply no reason to make verbal assent until the lawsuit triggered the required

enforcement of this contract. 

Corpus Juris Secundum, Vol. 17, Contracts, §75, sets forth various circumstances

when a contact signed by only one party is enforceable, and provides:

In the absence of a statute or arbitrary rule to the contrary, an agreement need

not be signed to be binding, provided it is either accepted and acted on, delivered and

acted on, or delivered and acquiesced in. So a written contract, although unsigned

by a party, is binding if the party accepts or performs under it or accepts the benefits

thereunder. Where a contract is enforced on the basis of a single signature, it must

generally be signed by the party to be charged under the contract and delivered to

nonsigned partywho indicates acceptance by performing. Moreover, the parties may

agree to be bound by their written contract even though it is not signed by either of

them or when it is signed by only one of them.
-2-

There is simply no evidence here to contradict the premise that both parties accepted this contract,

and when the circumstance arose triggering the application of this contract, the dealership acted upon

the contract.

I would affirm the Trial Court in all respects.

______________________________

HERSCHEL PICKENS FRANKS, P.J.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 552 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 552

   Requiring Members of the House of Representatives whose Members' 
    Representational Allowance is used to pay expenses incurred for 
  official travel to provide the Chief Administrative Officer of the 
 House of Representatives with detailed information on the travel, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2023

     Ms. Porter (for herself and Mr. Crow) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Requiring Members of the House of Representatives whose Members' 
    Representational Allowance is used to pay expenses incurred for 
  official travel to provide the Chief Administrative Officer of the 
 House of Representatives with detailed information on the travel, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Taxpayer-Funded 
Travel Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING MEMBERS WHOSE MEMBERS' REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCE IS 
              USED FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES TO PROVIDE DETAILED TRAVEL 
              INFORMATION TO CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER.

    (a) Information Required.--If the Members' Representational 
Allowance for the office of a Member of the House of Representatives is 
used to pay expenses incurred for official travel, the Member shall 
provide the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of 
Representatives with the following information with respect to the 
travel:
            (1) The identification of the individual who incurred the 
        expenses.
            (2) The date on which the expenses were incurred.
            (3) The location at which the expenses were incurred.
            (4) The identification of each recipient of a payment for 
        the expenses.
            (5) The nature of the official and representational duties 
        which were carried out while the individual engaged in the 
        travel.
    (b) Inclusion in Quarterly Disbursement Reports.--The Chief 
Administrative Officer shall include the information provided under 
subsection (a) in the quarterly statement of disbursements of the 
House.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
expenses incurred on or after the date of the adoption of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Ervain Lavet REYNOLDS v. CITY OF DOTHAN

CR-15-0908

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 61252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27883]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-105-2017]


Approval of Subzone Status; R.W. Smith & Co/TriMark USA, LLC; 
Lewisville, Texas

    On July 11, 2017, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Metroplex 
International Trade Development Corporation, grantee of FTZ 168, 
requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of 
FTZ 168, on behalf of R.W. Smith & Co/TriMark USA, LLC, in Lewisville, 
Texas.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (82 FR 32530, July 14, 2017). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed 
the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. 
Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board's Executive 
Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 
168C was approved on August 25, 2017, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to 
FTZ 168's 1,909-acre activation limit.

    Dated: December 20, 2017.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-27883 Filed 12-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Norman E. CAISON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0572

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is granted.
Active 

Time 

(Hours)

Avg Power 

(Watts)

Energy 

(kWh)

Active 

Time 

(Hours)

Avg Power 

(Watts)

Energy 

(kWh)

Active 

Time 

(Hours)

Television A

52" LED Backlit

5.53 18.38 0.102 3.58 18.58 0.066 3.87

Television I

32" CCFL

5.88 14.26 0.084 1.79 13.61 0.024 6.05

The Television Download Acquisition Mode Data includes data indicating the energy consumption 

associated with DAM mode. DOE conducted this testing on two TVs by configuring the internal 

electronic program guide (not enabled by default) and connecting to a subscription cable service 

by (1) coaxial cable only, (2) Ethernet only, and (3) cable and Ethernet together. Results over a 24 

hour period were recorded and charted for each connection configuration. 

The proceeding graphs display the power consumption over the 24 hour period.

Television Download Acquisition Mode

Ethernet Only Cable Only Cable and Ethernet
Avg Power 

(Watts)

Energy 

(kWh)

18.52 0.072

14.16 0.086

Cable and Ethernet
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ William B. SheproWilliam B. SheproChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 *
    
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[No. 52387-2-I.

Division One.

April 26, 2004.]

#### Lynn Shively, et al., *Appellants,*v. Gregory D. Arms, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-2-21442-0, Mary Yu, J., entered May 7 and 16, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Baker and Becker, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-694]



[[Page 1872]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Housing Service

7 CFR Part 1980

[FR Doc. E8-25849]
RIN 0575-AC73


Income Limit Modification

AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Direct final rule; change in effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service is delaying the effective date of a 
direct final rule, which was published on November 4, 2008 to amend its 
existing income limit structure for the Single Family Housing 
Guaranteed Loan Program.

DATES: The effective date of the direct final rule, published on 
November 4, 2008 [73 FR 65503-05], is delayed from January 20, 2009, to 
March 20, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joaqu[iacute]n Tremols, Acting 
Director, Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Division, USDA, Rural 
Development, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 2250, Stop 0784, 
Washington, DC 20250, telephone (202) 720-1465, E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e08a8f819195898ece9492858d8f8c93a0978483ce95938481ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="147e7b7565617d7a3a606671797b7867546370773a616770753a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: After further consultations with Congress 
and to afford the new administration adequate time for review, RHS is 
changing the effective date of the direct final rule to March 20, 2009.

    Dated: January 8, 2009.
Peter D. Morgan,
Associate Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
 [FR Doc. E9-694 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Scott W. BARNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3168

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 14, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
John Mitchell TOMLINSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-3790

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2017 Rehearing Denied November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
MONTANA RH BART APPLICABILITY PROCESS
 

Not B.E.
 

END
 

No 

Identify 

BARTeligible 

source 

DATE TEST: PTE TEST: CATEGORY TEST: Emitting units in 

Plantwide PTE Do emitting units existence 8-7-77 and >/= 250 belong in one or tpy for 

ANY pollutant? began operation after Yes more of 26 source 

Yes 8-7-62? categories? 

Yes 

Continue
 

Next Page
 

1
 
Exempt 

END 

No 

Do EUs meeting date 

and category tests, 

added together, have 

PTE </= 40 tpy for S02 

or NOxor </= 15 tpy for 

PM-10? 

Not 8.E. 

END 

No 

Does plant emit
 

SOs, NOx, PM-10,
 

NH3, or VOCs ?
 

Yes 

Yes 

Continue
 

Next Page
 

2
 
Not sUbject 

to BART 

Determine if 

ACTUAL VI 

pollutants Run model using all 

cause or VI pollutants contribute to 

visibility 

impairment 

No 

mandatory class I federal 

Does modeling indicate a 

0.5 deciview change at a 

area? 

Yes 

Subject to 

BART 

END 

applicability 

process ­

Continue with 

BART 

determination 

nrnr.pc:;c:; 

3
 
MONTANA RH BART RECONSTRUCTION DECISION
 

No 

Identify 

BARTeligible 

source, i.e., 

existing 

stationary 

facility 

Plantwide 

PTE >/= 250 

tpyany 

pollutant? Yes 

In existence 8-7-77 

and 

began operation 

after 8-7-62? Yes 

No 

Changes to EUs 

from 1962-1977? 

Does facility belong 

in one or more of 

26 source 

categories? 

.- See 

flowchart A 

Yes 

Did the cost of the 

changes exceed 50% 

of the cost of Yes replacement of the 

EU? 

No 

Yes
EX PARTE Arthur L. SIMON

CR-15-1137

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 24, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Herbert W. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1804

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit
32





Certification
pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithtown Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), Bradley E. Rock, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and Christopher Becker, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Smithtown Bancorp, Inc. each certify in their capacity as officers of the
Company that to the best of their knowledge:





the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations.





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.





May
      7, 2010
                  By: /s/ Bradley E. RockChairman
      and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      7, 2010
                  By: /s/ Christopher
  BeckerExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial
Officer
Alan M. ASPINWALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kyle Lynn BRADLEY, Appellant, v. ULTIMATE IMAGE AUTO, INC., Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4077

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Janiiaiy20 , 201 1

Mr . Kevi n Schlemnie r Unite dState s Department

o f Transpoitatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Av e S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Mr . Schlemnier : A t it s regularnieetin g hel don Januar y 11 , 201 1 (h

e Williamso n Count

y Airpor t Authorit y vote d unanimousl y t

o recommen dCap e Ai

r an d it s EA S proposa

l providin g fo

r si x (6 ) dail y flight s ove r

afou r (4 ) yea r contrac t ter ma t Williamso n Count

y Regiona l Airport . Ove r th e pas t year w e hav e see n enplanemen t number s increas e steadil y a s aresul t o f Cap e Air' s service . Affordabl e airfare , increase d frequenc y o f flights, reliabl e an

d efficien t opernlions , substantial advertisin g and marketin g efforts , an

d th e codeshar e wit

h America

n Airline s ar

e all reason s fo

r thi s positiv e trend . Th e Airpor

t ha s investe dagrea

t dea l o f resource s i

n assistin g Cap e Ai r

wit h thes e efforts . W

e loo k forwar dt o continuin g thi s partnershi p and full y suppor t thei r reques t fo r afou r (4 ) year contrac t i n orde r t o pla n an ddirec t our effort s over

alonger ter mand maximiz e th e retur

n o n our investments . W

e als o suppor t thei r propose dsix (6 ) dail y roundtri p flights , a s we hav e note d i n discussion s tha

t th e reduce d weeken d schedul e consistentl y ha s difficult y i n meetin g passenge r

demand , I t shoul dals o b e note d tha

t Cap e Air' s proposa

l include s th e establishmen t o f aloca l Cit y Ticke t Offic e andamuch neede dgroun dshuttl e fo r Cap e Ai r passenger s a

t St . Loui s Lambei l International Airport . Th e ticke t offic e concep t

i s a n outstandin g communit

y outreac h initiativ e tha

t will provid e Cap e Ai r

eve n greate r visibilit y i n ou r region , and i s furthe

r testamen t

t o thei r activ e participatio n a

t th e loca l level . Th e groun dshuttl e addresse s th e need t o efficiently mov e Cap e Ai r passenger awh o hav e already bee n throug h securit

y t o another

concours e or

termina l a t ST L withou t havin g t o exi t and re-ente r

rli e steril e area . W e reques t tha t i f approved , Cap e Ai

i * s new contrac t

and subsidy reques t

b e put int o effec t immediatel y i

n order t o implement

thes e initiative s sooner

rather tha n later . W e are confident

tha t Cap e Air' s proposa

l represent s th e bes t

us e o f EA S funding whil e providin g ou r regio n wit h qualit) ' sei-vice andaffordabl e acces s t o th e national ai r

transportatio n system . I

f w e ca n provid e fuilhe

r informatio n pleas e le

t m e know . Sincerely , Dougla s Kimm

e Airpor t Directo r WILLIAMSO N COUNT Y RFtilONAl . AlflPOH T • 10.-»00 TERMINA L OHIVIT , SUIT S 20 0 - MARION , ILLINOI S 629;> 9 (Ota)<)g3-3y;)3»rA X (()l(J)'jyV-*)129*('mnil- . iiirportl'Omidwciit.ne l www.wilcoairpOft.co m
Robert Lee STEWART, DC# 480642, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1361

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.