alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[719 NYS2d 95]

#### In the Matter of J. Kevin Meneilly (Admitted as James Kevin Meneilly), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

December 26, 2000

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Grace D.*Moran, Syosset *(Nancy A. Bolger*of counsel), for Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District.

*224
      *Joseph W. Ryan, Jr., P. C.,*Uniondale, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On September 6, 2000, the respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York of the Federal crimes of conspiracy to impede the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of 18 USC § 371, aiding tax fraud, in violation of 26 USC § 7206 (2), and false statements on income tax returns, in violation of 26 USC § 7206 (1). He was sentenced to 57 months imprisonment on the tax conspiracy counts and 36 months imprisonment on the charges involving tax fraud and false statements, with the terms to run concurrent. In addition, the court directed the respondent to make restitution in the amount of $40,000.

The Federal crime of aiding tax fraud, in violation of 26 USC § 7206 (2), is essentially similar to the New York felony of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree *(see, Matter of Papandon,*172 AD2d 109).

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony. Accordingly, he is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, J. Kevin Meneilly, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys *(see,*22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, J. Kevin Meneilly is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law. *[Recalled and vacated,*282 AD2d —, Apr. 23, 2001.]
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer**

**Under      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                       |                                            |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                       |                                            |
| Dated:              May 15, 2008 | By:                                              | /s/              Gary              J. Novinskie |
|                             | Gary              J. Novinskie                             |
|                             | Interim              Chief Executive Officer and President |

----
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 725 

Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 2023, as ‘‘Rare 

Cancer Day’’ to highlight the challenges patients with rare cancers face 

and to raise awareness and support efforts to improve early diagnosis 

and treatment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. KILMER, Mr. FITZPATRICK, and 

Mr. HIGGINS of New York) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 

2023, as ‘‘Rare Cancer Day’’ to highlight the challenges 

patients with rare cancers face and to raise awareness 

and support efforts to improve early diagnosis and treatment. 

Whereas approximately 1 in 5 people living with cancer in the 

United States is diagnosed with a rare cancer; 

Whereas all pediatric cancers are rare; 

Whereas a quarter of all cancer deaths each year are due to 

rare cancers; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 725 IH 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate is lower for patients with a 

rare cancer than for those diagnosed with a more common cancer; 

Whereas the early detection and treatment of rare cancers is 

challenging for patients, providers, and scientists; 

Whereas early detection of rare cancers currently is challenging for patients because they are not aware of rare 

cancer symptoms; 

Whereas the length of time that it takes for providers to diagnose a rare cancer is longer than for more common 

cancers because symptoms may be unusual and less recognizable; 

Whereas efforts to increase awareness of rare cancer symptoms among patients and clinicians would lead to earlier 

detection and improvements in survival rates; 

Whereas scientific understanding of and the development of 

effective treatments for many rare cancers are less established than with more common cancers; and 

Whereas treatment options for many rare cancers currently 

are more limited than with more common cancers: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports designating a ‘‘Rare Cancer Day’’; 

3 (2) recognizes the challenges of detecting rare 

4 cancer; 

5 (3) understands that rare cancer is prevalent 

6 among cancer patients; 

7 (4) acknowledges the devastating impact that 

8 rare cancer has on individuals; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 725 IH 

1 (5) recognizes the low survival rate of individ2 uals with rare cancer compared to more common 

3 cancers; 

4 (6) supports increasing awareness of rare can5 cer symptoms to increase early detection and im6 prove survival rates; 

7 (7) encourages partnerships with the medical 

8 and scientific fields to improve the early diagnosis of 

9 rare cancers and to develop effective treatments to 

10 eradicate them; and 

11 (8) supports the dedication of funding to ex12 plore cures and treatments for rare cancers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No . 04

- 19

- 00757

- CV

FEDEX CORPORATION and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.

, Appellant s

v.

Michelle CONTRERAS , Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Christopher Talamantez, II, Deceased; Krystal Saldana as Next Friend of C.M.T.

, II and J.T., Minors; Victoria Campos a s Next Friend of D.C., a Minor; Christopher Talamantez, Sr.; Aurelio Fernando Perez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Christian Adam Vasquez, Deceased; and Alexis Sanchez, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Christian Vasque z, Deceased and as Next Friend of C.V., Jr., a Minor, Appellee s

From the 22 5th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 22752

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MAR ION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order denying the special appearances of appellants FedEx Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. is REVERSED. We RENDER judgment dismissing the claims raised by appellees Michelle Contreras, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Christopher Talamantez, II, Deceased; Krystal Saldana as Next Friend of C.M.T.

, II and J.T., Minors; Victoria Campos a s Next Friend of D.C., a Minor; Christopher Talamante z, Sr.; Aurelio Fernando Perez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Christian Adam Vasquez, Deceased; and Alexis Sanchez, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Christian Vasquez, Deceased and as Next Friend of C.V., Jr., a Minor against FedEx Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. for lack of personal jurisdiction

. We ORDER appellees to pay the costs of this appeal.

SIGNED August 19, 2020.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
Christopher B. MILLER, Appellant, v. Mandy J. MILLER, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Letter Agreement Dated October 1, 2007



 Exhibit 10.12 
 

 
 October 1, 2007 
 Fred Kleisner 
 Morgan’s Hotel Group 
 475 Tenth
Avenue 
 New York, New York 10019 
 RE: Amendment to Employment
Agreement 
 Dear Fred: 
 I have reviewed your
correspondence dated September 25, 2007 which sets forth your proposed amendment to my employment agreement. I believe the first four paragraphs of your proposal accurately define the terms of our amendment and I have taken the liberty of
reiterating those terms herein. 
 I am writing this letter (referred to as this “Amendment”) to amend the employment agreement
between me and Morgans Hotel Group Management LLC, dated as of September 21, 2006 (referred to as the “Amendment”). All capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning attributed to them in
the Agreement. 
 My base salary, as defined in the fifth line on the first paragraph of the Agreement, shall increase to $625,000 per year
($26,041.66 semi-monthly), effective retroactively on August 15, 2007. 
 In addition to the equity granted to me in the Agreement, the
Company will grant me an addition 15,000 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and 15,000 LTIP Units (as defined in the Morgan Hotel Group Co. Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)). I will be required to sign an RSU agreement and an LTIP agreement,
and the terms of the grant of RSUs and LTIP Units will be governed by the Plan and the terms of those agreements. 
 The Company is
contemplating creating an incentive equity plan for the Hard Rock, which will require approval of the Board of Directors prior to implementation. If such a plan is implemented, under the Company’s current formulation of the plan, I will be
entitled to receive Hard Rock incentive equity in an amount equal to about 30% of the proposed 5% pool designated for such Hard Rock incentive equity. Of course, the amount of and specific terms of such equity grant shall be governed by the terms of
the Hard Rock incentive equity plan as 

  

 4455 Paradise Road, Las Vegas, NV 89109     702-693-5000     FAX
(702) 693-5010     (800) 693-ROCK 








 Fred Kleisner 
 Morgan’s
Hotel Group 
 October 1, 2007 
 Page Two 
  
 actually implemented. If no such Hard Rock incentive equity plan is implemented, the Company
will review my equity awards and grant me additional equity to compensate me commensurate with the equity participation currently contemplated for me under the Hard Rock incentive equity plan proposal. The parties hereby acknowledge that without the
Hard Rock incentive equity plan, I would have received an additional 15,000 RSUs and an additional 15,000 LTIP Units as part of this Amendment. 
 Please indicate your acceptance of this Amendment to the Agreement by signing below and returning the original of this Amendment to me. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/ Randy Kwasniewski

	Randy Kwasniewski


  

	
	Agreed and Accepted:
	
	 /s/ Fred Kleisner

	Fred Kleisner
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dewayne A. CORNELIUS, Appellant.

WD 81003

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: MAY 28, 2019

Mary Highland Moore, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Susan Lynn Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Before Division Three: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Dewayne Cornelius appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of second degree murder and one count of armed criminal action. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25 (b).
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| July 27, 2017 |                    |
|---------------|-------------------------|
|          |                    |   |
|          | /s/ Fung Kwok Wing      |   |
| Name:         | Fung Kwok Wing          |   |
| Title:        | Chief Financial Officer |   |
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00155

- CR

DANNY RAY GRAY, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 18

- 0252X

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER Our review of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case indicates that they contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 9.10(a)(3). Sensitive data also includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identificatio n number or similar government

- issued personal identification number.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record contains a social security number. Volume three of the reporter’s record contains the name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A co urt may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record and volume three of the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we order the cle rk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and volume three of the reporter’s record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: December 6, 2019
Amendment Number One to RARE Hospitality Deferred Compensation



 Exhibit 4.7 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE 
 RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 This First Amendment to the RARE Hospitality International, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is
adopted by the Retirement Plan Committee (the “Committee”), to be effective as of January 1, 2004 (the “Effective Date”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, RARE Hospitality International, Inc. (the “Company”)
maintains the Plan for the benefit of certain key management and highly compensated employees of the Company and its affiliates that participate in the Plan, and certain non-employee directors of the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan provides that the Committee, as the Plan administrator, may approve amendments to the Plan,
other than amendments affecting vesting or company contribution rates; and 
 WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend
the Plan, for plan years beginning on and after the Effective Date, to increase the maximum dollar amount of deferral contributions that a participant is permitted to contribute to the Plan each year from $20,000 to $50,000; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended, as of the Effective Date, to read as follows: 
 1. Section 3.2(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: 

(c) Application and Amount. A Participant may elect to have his Deferral Election apply to one of the following
categories of payments of Compensation: (1) Base Salary only; (2) Bonuses only; or (3) all payments of Compensation. A Participant may elect to defer his Base Salary, Bonuses or Compensation in l% increments up to a maximum of 100%,
but in no event may Deferral Contributions made for any Plan Year on behalf of a Participant other than a Nonemployee Director exceed the lesser of (i) 20% of the Participant’s Compensation (determined at the end of the Plan Year), or
(ii) $50,000. The maximum percentage and/or amount described in the preceding sentence may be changed by the Retirement Plan Committee, in its discretion, from time-to-time. 
 2. Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
# CHARTE RTOWNSHI PO FMERIDIA N

[irei l Dreyfu s [:liziibolli An

nL.cGofl " Lyn nOcliber g Joh nV'eenslr

a Truste e

Tmsic e Truste e Truste e SusanMcGilliciidd y Superviso r Miii" y M.G
. Helmbrech l Cler k Juli e Brixi e Treasure r Geral dJ
. Richard s Manage r Februar y 2 , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t

Facilit y U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportation , 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e SE. , Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mW12-140 , Washington
. D C 20590
. Ref: Su nCountr y Slo t Exemptio n- Docke t

Numbe r FAA-2012-008 9 " Ladie s an dGentlemen : Si mCountr y Airline s ha s requeste da nexemptio nfro mth e slo t limi t for Ronal dReaga n Washingto nNationa l Airpor t (DCA ) se t

forthi n§ 93.123(a) , t o permi t th e FA A t o creat e ai r carrie r slot s durin g certai nlimite dhour s for Su nCountry' s use . Th e propose dai r carrie r slot s woul dreplac e tw o slo t exemption s unde r

DO T Orde r

2010-12-1 6 awarde dt o Su nCountry
. O nJanuar y 6 , 2012 , th e Unite dState s Cour t o f Appeal s fo r

th e Distric t

o f Columbi aCircui t

vacate dth e DO T Order , an dSu nCountr y wil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee nDC A an dLansing' s Capita l Regio nInternationa l Airport
. Specifically , Su n Countr y desire s on e dail y slo t durin g eac ho f

th e 100 0 an d110 0 hours
. Th e propose d exemptio nwoul dpermi t Su nCountr y t o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi da ninequitabl e resul t o f th e Court' s order
.

Th e Su nCountr y DC A servic e i s essentia l t o th e economi c growt ho f th e Greate r

Lansin g Region
. Th e dail y servic e i s th e onl y larg e aircraf t (737-800 ) servic e t o Washingto n Reaga nAirport , i nth e stat e o f Michiga noutsid e o f

Detroit
. Prio r

t o Su nCountry , th e regiona l communit y ha drequeste dth e introductio no f thi s servic e fro mnumerou s othe r airlin e operator s withou t success . Accordingly , i t i s critica l tha t

th e FA A tak e th e necessar y step s t o ensur e th e continuatio no f th e Su nCountr y slot s a t th e establishe d flight time s i nsuppor t

o f Greate r Lansing' s busines s an deconomi c growth
. You r immediat e approva l o f thi s exemption , s o tha t Su nCountr y ca nbegi nt o ente r flight s schedule s for

sal e fo r th e balanc e o f

2012 , wil l b e greatl y appreciated
. Sincerely , ' /

.

515 1 MARS H ROAD , 0KEM0S,MICHIC;A N48864-119 8 (517 ) 853-400 0 FA X (517 ) 853-409 6 http:/Av\vw.t\vp.meridian.mi.u s A n Equa l Oppurtiinit yEmploye r \ t fiiilf J ni l n-iyilfi l ftiipi- r
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jeffery C. Swank, as
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Jeffery C. Swank


Jeffery
      C. Swank


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


Date:  August
      14, 2007








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Sidney BAKER v. STATE

CR-15-1022

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.