Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 9, 2018 / Notices 1015 

1See Honey from the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Rescission of the New Shipper Review 

and Preliminary Results of the Administrative 

Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 31557 (July 7, 2017) 

(Preliminary Rescission and Preliminary Results). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of the 2015–2016 Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Review and Final Results of the 2015– 

2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ 

dated October 30, 2017. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2015– 

2016 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review and 

Final Results of the 2015–2016 Administrative 

Review: Honey from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated concurrently with these results and 

hereby adopted by this notice. (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Dated: January 4, 2018. 

David Mussatt, 

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2018–00170 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–01–2018] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 41— 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Notification of 

Proposed Production Activity, Quad/ 

Graphics, Inc.—Chemical 

Research\Technology, (Offset and 

Gravure Publication Printing Ink), 

Hartford and Sussex, Wisconsin 

The Port of Milwaukee, grantee of 

FTZ 41, submitted a notification of 

proposed production activity to the FTZ 

Board on behalf of Quad/Graphics, 

Inc.—Chemical Research\Technology 

(Quad/Graphics—C\RT), located in 

Hartford and Sussex, Wisconsin. The 

notification conforming to the 

requirements of the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was 

received on December 5, 2017. 

The applicant indicates that it has 

submitted a separate application for 

FTZ designation at the Quad/Graphics— 

C\RT facility under FTZ 41. The facility 

is used for the production of offset and 

gravure publication printing ink. 

Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ 

activity would be limited to the specific 

foreign-status materials and components 

and specific finished product described 

in the submitted notification (as 

described below) and subsequently 

authorized by the FTZ Board. 

Production under FTZ procedures 

could exempt Quad/Graphics—C\RT 

from customs duty payments on the 

foreign-status materials used in export 

production. On its domestic sales, for 

the foreign-status materials noted below, 

Quad/Graphics—C\RT would be able to 

choose the duty rate during customs 

entry procedures that applies to offset 

and gravure publication printing ink 

(duty rate—1.8%). Quad/Graphics— 

C\RT would be able to avoid duty on 

foreign-status materials which become 

scrap/waste. Customs duties also could 

possibly be deferred or reduced on 

foreign-status production equipment. 

The materials sourced from abroad 

include: offset pigments (Yellow 174, 

Red 57:1 and Blue 15:3); gravure 

pigments (Yellow 14, Yellow 12, Red 

57:1 and Blue 15:4); and, flush pigment 

preparations for offset heat-set 

publication printing (Yellow 12, Red 

57:1 and Blue 15:3) (duty rate—6.5%). 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the Board’s Executive 

Secretary at the address below. The 

closing period for their receipt is 

February 20, 2018. 

A copy of the notification will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 

21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s 

website, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. 

For further information, contact Diane 

Finver at Diane.Finver@trade.gov or 

(202) 482–1367. 

Dated: January 3, 2018. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2018–00188 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–863] 

Honey From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Rescission of the New 

Shipper Review and Final Results of 

the Administrative Review; 2015–2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

SUMMARY: On July 7, 2017, The 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the Preliminary Rescission 

and Preliminary Results of the aligned 

2015–2016 new shipper review and 

2015–2016 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

the People’s Republic of China (China), 

covering the period December 1, 2015, 

through November 30, 2016. We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Rescission 

and Preliminary Results. After analyzing 

interested parties’ comments, we made 

no changes for the final results of these 

reviews. The final antidumping duty 

margins for these reviews are listed in 

the ‘‘Final Results of Reviews’’ section 

below. 

DATES: Applicable January 9, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carrie Bethea, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1491. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 7, 2017, Commerce published 

its Preliminary Rescission and 

Preliminary Results,1 and gave parties 

an opportunity to comment. For events 

subsequent to the Preliminary 

Rescission and Preliminary Results, see 

the accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. On October 30, 2017,2 in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act), 

Commerce extended the deadline for 

issuing the final results by 60 days until 

January 3, 2017. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the order is 

honey. For a complete description of the 

scope of this order, see the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this 

administrative review and new shipper 

review are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.4 In the 

Appendix to this notice, we have 

provided a list of the issues raised by 

parties. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in 

Commerce’s Central Records Unit, room 

B8024 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 

Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

the electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
1016 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 9, 2018 / Notices 

5See Preliminary Rescission, and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 10–11. 

6See Sunbeauty New Factual Submission at 2–4. 

7See accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Rescission and 

Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that Shanghai Sunbeauty 

Trading Co., Ltd. (Sunbeauty) did not 

meet the criteria for separate rate 

status.5 After the Preliminary Results, 

Sunbeauty provided a submission of 

new factual information, which 

included U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) entry documentation.6

However, Commerce has determined 

that Sunbeauty still failed to 

demonstrate its eligibility for a separate 

rate.7 Accordingly, Sunbeauty continues 

to be considered as part of the Chinawide entity. 

New Shipper Review 

In the Preliminary Rescission and 

Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that Jiangsu Runchen 

Agricultural/Sideline Foodstuff Co., Ltd. 

(Jiangsu Runchen) failed to provide 

documents needed to determine 

whether its sales during the POR were 

bona fide sales; accordingly, Commerce 

preliminarily rescinded the NSR. As 

explained in the Preliminary Rescission 

and Preliminary Results, section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act requires that 

any weighted average dumping margin 

determined in a NSR must be based on 

bona fide sales. Jiangsu Runchen did not 

provide a timely response to 

Commerce’s C/D questionnaire for 

Commerce to examine if it had bona fide 

sales during the POR and requested an 

untimely extension to submit its C/D 

questionnaire response. However, we 

denied the request as it failed to meet 

the ‘‘extraordinary circumstances’’ 

standard. Having found that it could not 

conduct the required bona fide analysis 

and, thus, could not rely on Jiangsu 

Runchen’s sales to calculate a dumping 

margin, Commerce preliminarily 

rescinded the NSR. Jiangsu Runchen did 

not comment on the Preliminary 

Rescission and Preliminary Results. 

With no new information on the 

record, Commerce continues to find that 

it cannot conduct the required bona fide 

analysis and, therefore, cannot rely on 

Jiangsu Runchen’s sales to calculate a 

dumping margin. Accordingly, 

Commerce is rescinding the new 

shipper with respect to Jiangsu 

Runchen. 

Final Results of New Shipper Review 

and Administrative Review 

In making our findings, because 

Sunbeauty was unable to provide 

evidence of a suspended entry of subject 

merchandise into the United States 

during the POR and is thus ineligible to 

receive a separate rate, we are treating 

Sunbeauty as part of the China-wide 

entity, the rate for which is $2.63 per 

kilogram. Furthermore, because 

Commerce rescinded the review with 

respect to Jiangsu Runchen, the 

company remains a part of the Chinawide entity. For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our final 

conclusions, see the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Duty Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), 

Commerce will determine, and the U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

15 days after the publication of the final 

results of this new shipper review and 

administrative review. We will instruct 

CBP to liquidate entries of subject 

merchandise from the China-wide entity 

at the China-wide rate. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of the final 

results of this administrative review and 

new shipper review for all shipments of 

the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject 

merchandise exported by Jiangsu 

Runchen and Sunbeauty, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

China-wide rate (i.e., $2.63 per 

kilogram); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed China and nonChina exporters not listed above that 

have separate rates, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the exporter-specific 

rate published for the most recently 

completed period; (3) for all China 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the China-wide rate of $2.63 per 

kilogram; and, (4) for all non-China 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the China exporter(s) that 

supplied that non-China exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) in 

this administrative review of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and 

777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.214 

and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: January 3, 2018. 

P. Lee Smith, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. List of Comments 

3. Background 

4. Scope of the Order 

5. Discussion of the Issues 

a. Correction of Draft Liquidation 

Instructions for U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) in the NSR 

b. Commerce’s Representation of 

Sunbeauty’s Request Regarding the 

Treatment of its Entries 

c. Commerce’s Practice of Partially 

Granting Sunbeauty’s Extension 

Requests 

d. Treatment of Sunbeauty as Part of the 

China-wide Entity 

6. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–00186 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES