alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7838

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHONG CHAO CHEN, a/k/a #21,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR94-156-S, CA-98-3362-S)

Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chong Chao Chen, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

October 8, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on October 13, 1998. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that

we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision.

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Chong Chao Chen seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Chen, Nos. CR-94-156-S;

CA-98-3362-S (D. Md. Oct. 13,* 1999). We deny Chen’s motion for

judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented, and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |                                                                                                                             |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: December 14, 2010 |                                                                                                                             |
|                    | /s/ Leif Andersen                                                                                                                |
|                    | Leif Andersen                                                                                                                    |
|                    | Chief Executive      Officer and acting Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer |
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                                                                   |

----
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    EXHIBIT 11
                          OLD KENT FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                      PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION

                                      Three Months Ended Sept 30     Nine Months Ended Sept 30
                                          1997           1996            1997           1996
<S>                                  <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
P R I M A R Y
Income for primary EPS calculation
  (net income)......................  $43,475,000    $40,297,000    $137,290,000   $117,092,000

Avg common shares outstanding.......   47,420,000     48,298,802      47,703,113     49,266,251
Common stock equivalents............      380,000        342,622         369,530        363,735
Shares for primary EPS calculation..   47,800,000     48,641,424      48,072,643     49,629,986

PRIMARY E.P.S.......................  $      0.91    $      0.83    $       2.86   $       2.36
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-13-00184-CV

Reidie James Jackson

v.

David Ellis, et al

(No. 101260-C IN 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Indigent

Filing

$50.00

$25.00

$100.00

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

Reidie Jackson

Reidie Jackson

Reidie Jackson

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $175.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on August 24, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Techwell, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Mark Voll, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 6, 2009 | /s/ Mark Voll                                                             |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Mark Voll                                                                 |
|                         | Vice President  of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
P.R.M. v. STATE

CR-15-1211

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Sherrard SIMMONS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0804

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
[No. 29957-7-II.

Division Two.

May 4, 2004.]

#### Fred A. Ross, et al., *Appellants,*v. Liberty Custom Homes, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 02-2-00444-2, George L. Wood, J., entered Feburary 7, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, A.C.J., concurred in by Armstrong, J., and Seinfeld, J. Pro Tern.
Alvin T. PARKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-812

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District 

FEBRUARY 18, 2014  THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).   1. Case No.  SD32649   Re: STEPHEN THOMASSON   Appellant,   vs.   STATE OF MISSOURI,   Respondent.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN GILBERT,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00359-CR

Appeal from

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1002470D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN GILBERT,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00359-CR

Appeal from

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1002470D)

RECORD RETENTION STATEMENT:

Pursuant to the Supreme Court order regarding disposition of court documents in this 

case, it is determined that this record should be:

 x NOT PERMANENTLY PRESERVED

(NO HISTORICAL VALUE)

 PERMANENTLY PRESERVED

(PERMANENTLY RETAIN--HAS HISTORICAL VALUE)

 PERMANENTLY RETAINED CRIMINAL CASE

(sentence over 20 years)

_______________________________________________ ____3/28/13____________

Judge=s Signature Date

Date Destroyed: ______________________________ per Order dated _____________
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN GILBERT,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00359-CR

Appeal from

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1002470D)

O R D E R

On this the 28th day of March, 2013, came on to be heard Kimberly Campbell’s motion 

to withdraw. Having determined that counsel has met the requirements of Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 

L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) and TEX.R.APP.P. 6.5, we grant the motion to withdraw on the following 

terms and conditions: 

Counsel is directed to (1) forward to Appellant this order and the Court’=s opinion and 

judgment issued this same day in this cause; (2) notify Appellant of the availability of 

discretionary review; and (3) notify Appellant of the appellate deadlines applicable to 

discretionary review.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013.

________________________________________________

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Shane LARMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-907

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Trimidus MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2728

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Alcoa Wenatchee Works - Summary of Particulate Matter Emission Test Data for BART-Eligible Emission Units

Zach Hedgpeth, PE August 12, 2013

BART EU APCD Potline 5 GTC #5

Anode Bake Furnace A446 Anode Bake Scrubber

Green Mill Dry Coke Scrubber Green Mill Dust Collector 2 Ingot Furnace 1 None Ingot Furnace 2 None Ingot Furnace 11 None OH-18/Alumina Handling 21MFF OH-21/Alumina Handling 19CFF OH-2/Alumina Handling 43E FF

BART EU APCD Ingot Furnace 1 None Ingot Furnace 2 None Ingot Furnace 11 NoneAlcoa Wenatchee Works - Summary of Particulate Matter Emission Test Data for BART-Eligible Emission Units

APCD Details Limit (gr/dscf) Test Date Test Method Alstom ABB (9 Compartments 1 Stack) 0.005 2011 - 3rd Qtr ? 2011 - 4th Qtr ? 2012- 1st Qtr ? 2012 - 2nd Qtr ? 2012 - 3rd Qtr ? 2012 - 4th Qtr ? 2013- 1st Qtr ? 2013 - MarchRM 29 Wheelabrator Size 4315C Model 108 (4 Units) 0.1 2011 - 2nd Test ? 2011 - 3rd Test ? 2012 - 1st Test ? 2012 - 2nd TestRM 315 2012 - 3rd TestRM 315 2013 - 1st TestRM 315 Procedair 1015-795-2227 Trap 10 0.005 2013 - April RM 29 Alcoa Model 4220 (5 Compartments) 0.1 ? ? NA 0.1 NA 0.1 NA 0.1 Flex Kleen NO. 84 LP 25 No unit-specific limit. Flex Kleen NO. 84 BV 9 No unit-specific limit. Alcoa Model #4220 (5 Compartments) 0.1

APCD Details Limit (lb/ton Al) Test Date Test Method NA 0.4 NA 0.4October 16-18, 2012 ? NA 0.4 Operation of Unit 1 is currently Curtailed
Operation of Unit 11 is currently Curtailed Operation of Unit 1 is currently Curtailed
Operation of Unit 11 is currently CurtailedEmissions (gr/dscf)# of runs Reference 0.0035 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2012 0.0008 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2012 0.0006 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2012 0.0013 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2012 0.0008 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2013 0.0008 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2013 0.0013 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2013 0.0018 3 Air Monitoring Report - April 2013 0.000221 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2012 0.000057 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2012 0.000542 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2012 0.000238 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2013 0.002238 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2013 0.002529 ? Air Monitoring Report - April 2013 0.0002 3 Air Monitoring Report - April 2013 0.0054 ? Air Monitoring Report - November 2012

Emissions (lb/ton Al)# of runs Reference

0,358 3 Semi-Annual MACT Report, 2/28/13 Operation of Unit 1 is currently Curtailed
Operation of Unit 11 is currently Curtailed Operation of Unit 1 is currently Curtailed
Operation of Unit 11 is currently Curtailed
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SinoFresh Healthcare, Inc.
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned President and
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      August 14, 2008
            /s/  Charles
      A. Fust
              Charles A. Fust
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              and
      acting Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
exv10w13



 





			
	

	 	Exhibit 10.13











November 17, 2006




Marcel Bernand

12 Jeremy Drive

Unionville, Ontario L3R 3K6 CN




Dear Marcel Bernand:




     Activant Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Activant”), is pleased to inform you that you
are eligible to receive a retention bonus of $21,492.10 (the “Bonus”), payable in three equal
annual installments, as provided below, as a reward for your continued service as a director,
consultant or employee of Activant or its holding company:



	 	 	 
	Date of Bonus Payment	 	Amount of Bonus
	September 30, 2007
	 	33-1/3%
	September 30, 2008
	 	33-1/3%
	September 30, 2009
	 	33-1/3%





Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of the consummation of a Change in Control (as defined
in the Amended and Restated Activant Group Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan) of Activant, all annual
installments set forth above not previously paid shall become immediately due and payable upon
such consummation, subject to the following paragraph of this letter.




     You must be serving as a director, consultant or employee of Activant or its holding company
at the time each installment is payable in order to earn and receive such installment, but there
are no other conditions to the Bonus. In the event that your service relationship with Activant
or its holding company terminates prior to the time any annual installment is payable, you will
forfeit that and all subsequent installments. Activant may withhold from the Bonus any such
Federal, state, local or other taxes, including applicable taxes of any jurisdiction outside the
United States, as shall be required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable law or regulation.



     You understand that the Bonus made available to you hereunder does not constitute a guarantee
of continued service as a director, consultant or employee of Activant or its holding company, and
that your service relationship with Activant or its holding company is at will. As such, you or
the shareholders of Activant or its holding company may terminate your service as a director at
any time and for any reason or no reason and you or Activant or its holding company may terminate
your service as a consultant or employee at any time and for any reason or nor reason, in either
case, with or without cause or advance notice. In addition, Activant and its subsidiaries retain
the right to modify your compensation and benefits, other than this Bonus, within their sole
discretion, upon notice to you, to the fullest extent allowed by law.





 









 





     Unless otherwise determined by Activant’s Board of Directors, any payments made hereunder
will not be taken into account in computing your compensation for the purposes of determining any
benefits or compensation under (i) any retirement, life insurance or other benefit plan of
Activant or (ii) any agreement between Activant and you.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Greg Petersen
 	 
	 	Greg Petersen, 	 
	 	Executive Vice President
Jose BECERRA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0595

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
----

----

III Informaciones

Comité de las Regiones

----

ANUNCIO DE CONTRATACIÓN NoCDR/A/23/05

DIRECTOR/A

DE LA DIRECCIÓN DE SECRETARÍA, SERVICIO JURÍDICO Y ASISTENCIA A LOS MIEMBROS

(Categoría A*, grado A*14-15)

(2005/C 192 A/01)

1.   PUESTO VACANTE

El Comité de las Regiones ha decidido iniciar el procedimiento para la provisión de un puesto de Director/a (categoría A*, grado A*14-15), según lo dispuesto en el artículo 29, apartado 2, del Estatuto de los funcionarios.

Se trata del puesto de Director de la Dirección de Secretaría, Servicio Jurídico y Asistencia a los Miembros.

De acuerdo con lo dispuesto en el artículo 63 del Reglamento Interno del Comité de las Regiones, la Autoridad Facultada para Proceder a los Nombramientos correspondiente a este puesto es la Mesa del Comité de las Regiones, a propuesta del Secretario General.

2.   NATURALEZA DE LAS FUNCIONES

Bajo la autoridad del Secretario General, el Director dirige la Dirección de Secretaría, Servicio Jurídico y Asistencia a los Miembros. Está encargado, en particular, de:

3.   REQUISITOS

A.   Condiciones generales

El candidato deberá:

B.   Condiciones particulares

Los candidatos serán seleccionados sin distinción de raza, creencias políticas, filosóficas o religiosas, sexo, orientación sexual, estado civil o situación familiar. El Comité de las Regiones garantiza el respeto de la igualdad de oportunidades en su política de personal.

4.    CONDICIONES DE EMPLEO

La remuneración y las condiciones de empleo son las aplicadas a los funcionarios que desempeñan una función correspondiente al puesto de Director de las Comunidades Europeas. En caso de contratación externa (2) se aplicará el grado A*14.

5.   PRESENTACIÓN DE CANDIDATURAS

El Presidente

Peter STRAUB

----

(1)  Alemán, checo, danés, eslovaco, esloveno, español, estonio, finés, francés, griego, húngaro, inglés, italiano, letón, lituano, maltés, neerlandés, polaco, portugués y sueco.

(2)  A efectos de clasificación, la contratación de un funcionario de las Comunidades Europeas que todavía no ha alcanzado el grado A*14 se considerará como una contratación externa.

----
M.M., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2869

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 18, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

/s/ Greg Holsted

Greg Holsted, Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 5, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James E. Hogue, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Wiltex
A, Inc., (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1. the accompanying Form 10-QSB report for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. By:
    /s/ JAMES E. HOGUEJames E. HoguePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer Date: September 8, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,002]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 27, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Gerald Keller Logging, Eureka, Montana.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7105 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
4 ACES OF TAMPA, INC. and Carolyn Carrido, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. George GORDON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0646

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 09, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.