Onyx Environmental Services 

Sauget, Illinois 

Evaluation of Metals, Particulate 

Matter, Hydrogen 

Chloride/Chlorine Gas and 

PCDD/PCDF Emissions for 

Incinerators 2,3 and 4 

November 2002 Test Program 

ENS R Corporatio n 

Januar y 200 3 

Documen t Numbe r 10002-005-40 0 
m i 

CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 

1.1 Program Summary 1-1 

1.2 Field Program Schedule 1-1 

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2-1 

2.1 Introduction • 2-1 

2.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDF s 2-1 

2.3 Stack Emission Results for Target Metals 2-1 

2.4 Stack Emission Results for Particulate matter, HCI, and Cl 2 2-2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 3-1 

3.1 Sampling Procedures 3-1 

3.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Ga s Determinations 3-1 

3.1.2 PCDD/PCD F Sampling 3-1 

3.1.3 Metals Sampling 3-1 

3.1.4 PM/HCI/CI 2 Sampling Procedure 3-1 

3.2 Analytical Procedures 3-2 

3.2.1 PCDD/PCD F Analyses 3-2 

3.2.2 Metals Analyses 3-2 

3.2.3 PM/HCI /CI 2 Analysis 3-2 

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 4-1 

4.1 Introduction 4-1 

4.2 Stack Sampling QA/Q C 4-1 

4.3 Chain-of-Custody 4-2 

4.4 Analytical QA/Q C 4-2 

4.4.1 Analysis for Metals 4-2 

4.4.2 Analysis for PCDDs/PCDF s 4-3 

J:\Air_Tox\Projed Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report j January, 2003 

Nov02.doc 
INTERNA TIONAL 

CONTENTS - CONTINUED 

4.4.3 Analysis for Particulate Matter 4-3 

4.4.4 Analysis for HCI/CI 2 4-3 

APPENDICES 

A - FIELD DATA SHEETS 

B - PROCESS FEED AND OPERATING CONDITIONS 

C - FIELD EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION FORMS 

D - ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

ii January, 2003 
EIBR . 

INTERNATIONAL 

LIST OF TABLES 

TABLE 2-1 ONYX FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 2 PCDD/PCD F EMISSION RESULTS - TE Q BASIS .. 2-3 

TABLE 2-2 ONYX FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 2 PCDD/PCD F EMISSION RESULTS - CONGENER 

CLASS TOTALS 2-4 

TABLE 2-3 ONYX FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 3 PCDD/PCD F EMISSION RESULTS - TE Q BASIS .. 2-5 

TABLE 2-4 ONYX FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 3 PCDD/PCD F EMISSION RESULTS - CONGENER 

CLASS TOTALS 2-6 

TABLE 2-5 ONYX ROTARY KILN UNIT 4 PCDD/PCD F EMISSION RESULTS - TE Q BASIS 2-7 

TABLE 2-6 ROTARY KILN UNIT 4 PCDD/PCD F EMISSION RESULTS - CONGENER CLASS TOTALS 2-8 

TABLE 2-7 SUMMARY O F HW C MAC T METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 2 2-9 

Table 2-8 Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 2 2-10 

Table 2-9 Summary of HW C MAC T Metals Emissions for Unit 3 2-13 

TABLE 2-10 SUMMARY O F INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 3 2-14 

Table 2-11 SUMMARY OF HW C MAC T METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 4 2-17 

TABLE 2-12 SUMMARY O F INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 4... 2-18 

Table 2-13 PM/HCI/CI 2 EMISSION RESULTS FOR UNIT 2 2-21 

Table 2-14 PM / HCI / Cl 2 EMISSION RESULTS FOR UNIT 3 2-22 

Table 2-15 PM / HCI / Cl 2 EMISSION RESULTS FOR UNIT 4 2-23 

J:\Aif_Tox\Froject Fi!es\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report jjj January, 2003 

Nov02.doc 
EMIR . 

/NTERf/ATIONAL 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

1.1 Program Summary 

ENS R International wa s retained by Ony x Environmental Services , Sauget, Illinois to conduct 

stack ga s emission sampling during the week of November 18, 200 2 on three incinerators at the 

facility. Unit 2, Unit 3 and Unit 4 were tested for dioxins and furans in accordance with EP A 

Method 0023, twelve (12) metals 1 in accordance with EP A Method 2 9 and particulate matter (PM), 

hydrogen chloride (HCI), and chlorine (Cl 2 ) in accordance to EP A Method 26A. Stack flows were 

determined by pitot tube/water manometer as part of the actual sampling process. Stack moisture 

w a s determined by measuring the volume gained in the sampling train during sampling. Oxyge n 

and carbon dioxide were determined by collecting a Tediar® ba g sample followed by ORSA T 

analysis. 

Method 0023 samples were labeled, packaged and shipped following accepted protocols to Alta 

Analytical Inc., El Dorado Hills, C A for dioxin and furan analysis. Method 29 samples were 

labeled, package d and shipped following accepted protocols to PS C Analytical Services Inc., 

Burlington, Ontario (Canada). Th e front-half fractions from the Method 0050 sampling train (fronthalf rinse an d particulate filter) were labeled, packaged an d shipped following accepted protocols 

to ENSR' s Air Toxics Laboratory in Harvard M A where they were subjected to gravimetric 

analysis. Back-half fractions from this sampling train were also sent to PS C Analytical Services 

Inc., Burlington, Ontario for HCI an d Cl 2 determination. Th e HCI an d Cl 2 analyses were performed 

in accordanc e with EP A Method 9057 (ion chromatography). In addition to program samples , 

ENS R prepared two field blanks for analysis, one for each incinerator stack. 

1.2 Field Program Schedule 

T h e test wa s completed over a five-day time frame as follows: 

Novembe r 18 - Travel to the site an d set up on stack of Unit 3; 

November 19 - Completed Ru n 1 and 2 on Unit 3; move and set-up equipment on Unit 2; 

November 20 - Completed Ru n 1 and 2 on Unit 2, move an d set-up equipment on Unit 4; 

November 21 - Completed Run 1 and 2, on Unit 3; 

November 22 - Completed run 3 o n Unit 4, prepared sample s for shipment, departed site. 

1

 These metals included: antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, 

silver and thallium. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Backup of 

Report Nov02.wbk 

1-1 January, 2003 
ENS R 

INTEKNA TIONAL 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

1.1 Program Summary 

ENS R International wa s retained by Ony x Environmental Services , Sauget, Illinois to conduct 

stac k gas emission sampling during the week of November 18, 2002 on three incinerators at the 

facility. Unit 2, Unit 3 and Unit 4 were tested for dioxins and furans in accordance with EP A 

Method 0023, twelve (12) metals 1 in accordance with EP A Method 29 and particulate matter (PM), 

hydrogen chloride (HCI), and chlorine (Cl 2 ) in accordance to EP A Method 26A. Stack flows were 

determined by pitot tube/water manometer a s part of the actual sampling process. Stac k moisture 

w a s determined by measuring the volume gained in the sampling train during sampling. Oxygen 

and carbon dioxide were determined by collecting a Tediar® bag sample followed by ORSA T 

analysis. 

Method 0023A samples were labeled, packaged and shipped following accepted protocols to Alta 

Analytical Inc., El Dorado Hills, C A for dioxin and furan analysis. Method 29 sample s were 

labeled, packaged and shipped following accepted protocols to PS C Analytical Services Inc., 

Burlington, Ontario (Canada). Th e front-half fractions from the Method 26A sampling train (fronthalf rinse and particulate filter) were labeled, packaged and shipped following accepted protocols 

to ENSR' s Air Toxics Laboratory in Harvard M A where they were subjected to gravimetric 

analysis. Back-half fractions from this sampling train were also sent to PS C Analytical Services 

Inc., Burlington, Ontario for HCI and Cl 2 determination. Th e HCI and Cl 2 analyses were performed 

in accordance with EP A Method 9057 (ion chromatography). In addition to program samples , 

ENS R prepared two field blanks for analysis, one for eac h incinerator stack. 

1.2 Field Program Schedule 

T h e test was completed over a five-day time frame a s follows: 

November 18 - Travel to the site and set up on stack of Unit 3; 

Novembe r 19 - Completed Ru n 1 and 2 on Unit 3; move and set-up equipment on Unit 2; 

Novembe r 20 - Completed Ru n 1 and 2 on Unit 2, move and set-up equipment on Unit 4 ; 

November 21 - Completed Ru n 1 and 2, on Unit 4; 

1

 These metals included: antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, 

silver and thallium. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

1-1 January, 2003 
INTERNA TIONAL 

Novembe r 22 - Completed run 3 on Unit 4, prepared sample s for shipment, departed site. 

J:\Air_Tca\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Novernber 2002\Repoit\Report 

Nov02.doc 

1-2 January, 2003 
ewer . 

INTERNA T/ONAL 

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

2.1 Introduction 

This section summarizes the test program results. Emissions data are summarized in this section and 

feed and process operating data are included in Appendix B. 

2.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDFs 

A summary of the PCDD/PCD F emission results on a TE Q basis for Unit 2, Unit 3 and Unit 4 are 

included in Tables 2-1, 2-3, and 2-5 respectively. It should be noted that it was necessary to perform a 

post test calibration on the meter box that was used for the M23A sampling train (Box # 80754). The 

resultant calibration factor and Delta H were utilized for emissions calculations in accordance with the 

specified method criteria in section 4. For further discussion regarding the Method 5 post-test 

calibration procedure, please refer to section 4.2. These results indicate that: 

. The PCDD/PCD F emissions for Unit 2 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 0.07 ng/m3 @ 7% 

0 2 ) are below the HW C MAC T emission standard of 0.4 ng/m3 @ 7% 0 2 ; 

. The PCDD/PCD F emissions for Unit 3 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 0.04 ng/m3 @ 7% 

0 2 ) are below the HW C MAC T emission standard of 0.4 ng/m3 @ 7% 0 2 ; 

. The PCDD/PCD F emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for runs 1, 2, and 3 were 0.06 ng/m 3 @ 

7% 0 2 ) are below the HW C MAC T emission standard of 0.2 ng/m3 @ 7% 0 2 ; 

2.3 Stack Emission Results for Target Metals 

A summary of the metals emissions for all incinerators is included in tables 2-7 through 2-12. Tables 

2-8,2-10 and 2-12 provide a detailed summary ofthe individual metals emissions for all twelve metals. 

A summary of metals emissions categorized by Low Volatile Metals (LVM), Semi-volatile Metals (SVM) 

and mercury is provided in Tables 2-7, 2-8 and 2-11. The target metals results indicate that: 

. The LV M and SV M metals emissions for Unit 2 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were < 34.21 

pg/m3 @ 7% 0 2 for LVM s and 8.44 pg/m 3 @ 7% 0 2 for SVMs ) were lower than the new HW C 

MAC T emission standards of 97 pg/m3 and 240 pg/m3 (corrected to 7% 0 2 ) for LVM s and SVM s 

respectively; 

The mercury emissions for Unit 2 (average for runs 1 and 2 were 155.42 pg/m 3 @ 7% 0 2 ) were 

above the new HW C MAC T emission standard of 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 0 2 ; 

The LV M and SV M metals emissions for Unit 3 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were < 12.23 

pg/m3 @ 7% 0 2 for LVM s and 4.71 pg/m3 @ 7% 0 2 for SVMs ) were lower than the new HW C 

MAC T emission standards of 97 pg/m3 and 240 pg/m3 (corrected to 7% 0 2 ) for LVM s and SVM s 

respectively; 

J:\Air_Tox\Prpject Rles\OnyxM0nyx 2002 wofX\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-1 January, 2003 
/AITERflA r/ONAL 

The mercury emissions for Unit 3 (average for runs 1 and 2 were 101.35 ug/m3 @ 7% 0 2 ) were 

lower than the new HW C MAC T emission standard of 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 0 2 . 

The LV M and SV M metals emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for three (3) runs were < 10.26 

ug/m3 @ 7% 0 2 for LVM s and 8.80 pg/m 3 @ 7% 0 2 for SVMs ) were lower than the new HW C 

MAC T emission standards of 97 pg/m3 and 240 pg/m3 (corrected to 7% 0 2 ) for LVM s and SVM s 

respectively; 

The mercury emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for three (3) runs were 459.17 pg/m3 @ 7% 

0 2 ) were above the new HW C MAC T emission standard of 130 pg/m 3@ 7% 0 2 . 

2.4 Stack Emission Results for Particulate matter, HCI, and Cl 2 

A summary ofthe PM/HCI/CI 2 emissions for both incinerators is provided in Tables 2-13 through 2-15. 

The data set shows emissions of P M to be below the MAC T limit of 34 mg/dscm (0.015 gr/dscf). 

Emission levels for HCI and Cl 2 were also well below the MAC T limit of 77 ppm. The results for Units 

2, 3 and 4 were as follows: 

. The particulate matter emissions for Unit 2 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 5.3 mg/dscm 

@ 7% 0 2 ). 

. The particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 3.0 mg/ dscm 

@ 7% 0 2 ). 

. The particulate matter emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for three (3) runs were 4.3 mg/ 

dscm @ 7% 0 2 ). 

• The HCl/CI 2 emissions for Unit 2 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 10.72 ppm, @7 % 0 2 ). 

. The HCI/CI 2 emissions for Unit 3 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 8.31 ppm, @7 % 0 2 ). 

. The HCI/CI 2 emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for three (3) runs was 11.35 ppm, @7 % 0 2 ). 

J:\Air_Tox\ProJect Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

No\02.doc 

2-2 January, 2003 
MrERNAriONAL 

TABLE 2-1 ONYX FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 2 PCDD/PCDF EMISSION RESULTS - TEQ BASIS 

Run No. 

Date 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

Units 

1 

20-Nov-02 

08:15 

11:31 

20-NOV-02 

12:15 

15:18 

Sample Volume dscf 141.218 121.479 

Sample Volume m

J 4.00 3.44 

Moisture Content % v/v 38.8 38.1 

0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 11.00 11.00 

C 0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 4.70 4.10 

Isokinetics % 107 106 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 6,126 5,341 

PCDD/PCD F 

Parameters TEF (a) 

pg/ 

sample 

ng/m3 

T EQ 

pg/ 

sample 

ng/m3 

T EQ 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 

1.2.3.6.7.8- HxCDD, 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDD 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

OCDD 

1.00 

0.50 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.01 

0.00 

3 

21 

24 

72 

52 

576 

511 

8.5E-04 

2.6E-03 

6.0E-04 

1.8E-03 

1.3E-03 

1.4E-03 

1.3E-04 

9 

41 

40 

119 

88 

839 

802 

2.5E-03 

5.9E-03 

1.2E-03 

3.5E-03 

2.6E-03 

2.4E-03 

2.3E-04 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 

2.3.4.6.7.8- HxCDF 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDF 

1.2.3.4.6.7.8- HpCDF 

1.2.3.4.7.8.9- HpCDF 

OCDF 

0.10 

0.05 

0.50 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.01 

0.01 

0.00 

38 

54 

93 

101 

67 

96 

25 

273 

19 

65 

9.5E-04 

6.8E-04 

1.2E-02 

2.5E-03 

1.7E-03 

2.4E-03 

6.3E-04 

6.8 E-04 

4.9E-05 

1.6 E-05 

79 

103 

195 

179 

125 

194 

51 

421 

34 

95 

2.3E-03 

1.5E-03 

2.8E-02 

5.2E-03 

3.6E-03 

5.6E-03 

1.5E-03 

1.2E-03 

9.9E-05 

2.8E-05 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TCDD 

PeCDD 

HxCDD 

HpCDD 

TCDF 

PeCDF 

HxCDF 

HpCDF 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

1,560 

2,050 

5,040 

1,290 

1,200 

974 

762 

335 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

O.OE+00 

3,730 

4,370 

8,740 

1,940 

2,710 

2,080 

1,470 

609 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+O0 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

TOTA L TEQs (ng/m3) 0.03 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 % Q1) 0.04 

TOTA L TEQs (g/s) 8.6E-11 

0.07 

0.09 

1.7E-10 

(a) U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

= MDL value for a ND 

J:\Air_Tox\Project FIIes\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Field\Unit 2\[M29 U2.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-3 January, 2003 
ENSR . 

/NTERNAT/ONAL 

TABLE 2-2 ONYX FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 2 PCDD/PCDF EMISSION RESULTSCONGENER CLASS TOTALS 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 

Start Time 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 

1 In ite 

11:31 15:18 

Sample Volume dscf 141.218 121.479 

Sample Volume m

3 3.999 3.44 

Moisture Contei % v/v 38.8 38.1 

0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 11.0 11.0 

C O z Cone. % v/v (dry) 4.7 4.1 

Isokinetics % 107 106 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 6,126 5,341 

PCDD/PCD F pg/ pg/ 

Parameters sample ng/m3 sample ng/m3 

TOTAL TCDD 1,560 3.9E-01 3,730 1.1E+00 

TOTAL PeCDD 2,050 5.1 E-01 4,370 1.3E+00 

TOTAL HxCDD 5,040 1.3E+00 8,740 2.5E+00 

TOTAL HpCDD 1,290 3.2E-01 1,940 5.6 E-01 

OCDD 511 1.3E-01 802 2.3E-01 

TOTAL TCDF 1,200 3.0E-01 2,710 7.9E-01 

TOTAL PeCDF 974 2.4E-01 2,080 6.0E-01 

TOTAL HxCDF 762 1.9E-01 1,470 4.3E-01 

TOTAL HpCDF 335 8.4E-02 609 1.8E-01 

OCDF 65 1.6E-02 95 2.8E-02 

•:•:• TOTA L tetra-octa (ng/m3) = 3.4 7.7 

:•:• TOTA L tetra-octa (ng/m1 @ 7 % 02 ) = 4.8 10.8 

:: : TOTA L tetra-octa (g/s) = 1.0E-08 1.9E-08 

J:\Air_Tox\FToject Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Field\Unit 2\[M29 U2.xls]DATA 

J:\Wr_Tox\Projecl Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 wortANovember 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-4 January, 2003 
Elftt t 

INTERNATIONAL 

TABLE 2-3 ONYX FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 3 PCDD/PCDF EMISSION RESULTS - TEQ 

BASIS 

Run No. 

Date 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

Units 

1 

19-NOV-02 

09:45 

12:56 

19-NOV-02 

13:35 

16:37 

Sample Volume dscf 122.347 121.291 

Sample Volume n r 3.46 3.43 

Moisture Content % v/v 37.3 37.1 

0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 13.10 13.60 

C 0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 4.30 3.40 

Isokinetics % 108 100 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,150 5,472 

PCDD/PCD F 

Parameters TEF (a) 

pg/ 

sample 

ng/m3 

T EQ 

pg/ 

sample 

ng/m3 

TEQ 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 

1.2.3.6.7.8- HxCDD 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDD 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

OCDD 

1.00 

0.50 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.01 

0.00 

: 4 

10 

13 

31 

22 

217 

369 

1.1 E-03 

1.5E-03 

3.8E-04 

9.0E-04 

6.2E-04 

6.3E-04 

1.1 E-04 

25 

22 

57 

35 

455 

707 

2.2E-03 

3.6E-03 

6.5E-04 

1.6E-03 

1.OE-03 

1.3E-03 

2.1 E-04 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 

2.3.4.6.7.8- HxCDF 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDF 

1.2.3.4.6.7.8- HpCDF 

1.2.3.4.7.8.9- HpCDF 

OCDF 

0.10 

0.05 

0.50 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.01 

0.01 

0.00 

25 

27 

42 

42 

32 

39 

11 

193 

8 

101 

7.1 E-04 

3.9E-04 

6.1 E-03 

1.2E-03 

9.2E-04 

1.1 E-03 

3.1 E-04 

5.6E-04 

2.2E-05 

2.9E-05 

37 

43 

70 

60 

47 

65 

18 

206 

11 

92 

1.1 E-03 

6.2E-04 

1.0E-02 

1.7E-03 

1.4E-03 

1.9E-03 

5.1 E-04 

6.0E-04 

3.2E-05 

2.7E-05 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TOTAL 

TCDD 

PeCDD 

HxCDD 

HpCDD 

TCDF 

PeCDF 

HxCDF 

HpCDF 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

496 

574 

1,180 

489 

808 

520 

341 

217 

0.0E+00 

O.OE+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

O.OE+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

1,310 

1,350 

3,020 

1,030 

1,120 

842 

532 

242 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

TOTA L TEQs (ng/m3) 0.02 

TOTA L TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 % Q2) 0.03 

TOTA L TEQs (g/s) 4.0E-11 

0.03 

0.05 

7.4E-11 

(a) U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

| | = MDL value for a ND 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worirtNovember 2002\FieW\Unit 3\[M29 U3.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Proiect Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 2-5 

Nov02.doc 

January, 2003 
INTERNATIONAL 

TABLE 2-4 ONYX FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 3 PCDD/PCDF EMISSION RESULTS -

CONGENER CLASS TOTALS 

Run No. 

Date 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

1 

19-Nov-02 

09:45 

12:56 

2 

19-Nov-02 

13:35 

16:37 

Sample Volume 

Units 

dscf 122.347 121.291 

Sample Volume m

3 3.465 3.43 

Moisture Contei % v/v 37.3 37.1 

0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 13.1 13.6 

C O z Cone. % v/v (dry) 4.3 3.4 

Isokinetics % 108 100 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,150 5,472 

PCDD/PCD F pg/ pg/ 

Parameters sample ng/m3 sample ng/m3 

TOTAL TCDD 496 1.4E-01 1,310 3.8 E-01 

TOTAL PeCDD 574 1.7E-01 1,350 3.9E-01 

TOTAL HxCDD 1,180 3.4E-01 3,020 8.8E-01 

TOTAL HpCDD 489 1.4E-01 1,030 3.0E-01 

OCD D 369 1.1 E-01 707 2.1 E-01 

TOTAL TCDF 808 2.3E-01 1,120 3.3E-01 

TOTAL PeCDF 520 1.5E-01 842 2.5E-01 

TOTAL HxCDF 341 9.8E-02 532 1.5E-01 

TOTAL HpCDF 217 6.3E-02 242 7.0E-02 

OCDF 101 2.9E-02 92 2.7E-02 

TOTA L tetra-octa (ng/m3) = 1.5 3.0 

•:•:• TOTA L tetra-octa (ng/m3 @ 7 % 02 ) = 2.6 5.6 

:•:•: TOTA L tetra-octa (g/s) = 3.6E-09 7.7E-09 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worttNovember 2002\Fie!d\Unit 3\IM29 U3.xls]DATA 

J:VAiO"ox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-6 January, 2003 
ENSR . 

INTERNA TIONAL 

TABLE 2-5 ONYX ROTARY KILN UNIT 4 PCDD/PCDF EMISSION RESULTS - TEQ BASIS 

R u n No . Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Dat e 21-Nov-0 2 21-Nov-0 2 22-NOV-0 2 

Start Tim e 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Sto p Tim e 

1 1 nifc 

12:50 17:01 11:20 

Sample Volume 

u mis 

dscf 150.596 150.067 152.010 

Sample Volume m

3 4.26 4.25 4.30 

Moisture Content % v/v 33.1 34.0 35.0 

0 2 Cone. % v/ v (dry) 13.50 13.60 13.40 

C 0 2 Cone. % v/ v (dry) 3.90 3.80 4.50 

Isokinetics % 102 101 103 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 19,054 19,141 18,986 

PCDD / PCD F 

Parameters TEF (a) 

pg/ 

sample 

ng/m3 

TEQ 

pg/ 

sam pie 

ng/m3 

TEQ 

pg/ 

sample 

ng/m3 

TEQ 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 

1.2.3.6.7.8- HxCDD 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDD 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

OCDD 

1.00 

0.50 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.01 

0.00 

10 

53 

66 

127 

71 

568 

290 

2.3E-03 

6.3E-03 

1.6E-03 

3.0E-03 

1.7E-03 

1.3E-03 

6.8E-05 

8 

46 

63 

125 

70 

576 

283 

1.9E-03 

5.4E-03 

1.5E-03 

2.9E-03 

1.6E-03 

1.4E-03 

6.7E-05 

15 

88 

117 

238 

128 

1,040 

483 

3.6E-03 

1.0E-02 

2.7E-03 

5.5E-03 

3.0E-03 

2.4E-03 

1.1 E-04 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 

2.3.4.6.7.8- HxCDF 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDF 

1.2.3.4.6.7.8- HpCDF 

1.2.3.4.7.8.9- HpCDF 

OCDF 

0.10 

0.05 

0.50 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.10 

0.01 

0.01 

0.00 

21 

27 

57 

38 

36 

77 

13 

100 

9 

28 

4.8E-04 

3.2E-04 

6.6E-03 

8.8E-04 

8.5E-04 

1.8E-03 

3.0E-04 

2.3E-04 

2.2E-05 

6.6E-06 

19 

31 

56 

36 

36 

74 

15 

106 

12 

32 

4.5E-04 

3.6E-04 

6.6E-03 

8.4E-04 

8.4E-04 

1.7E-03 

3.6E-04 

2.5E-04 

2.9E-05 

7.5E-06 

35 

45 

95 

61 

63 

120 

20 

158 

19 

39 

8.1E-04 

5.3E-04 

1.1E-02 

1.4E-03 

1.5E-03 

2.8E-03 

4.7E-04 

3.7E-04 

4.3E-05 

9.1 E-06 

TOTAL TCDD 

TOTAL PeCDD 

TOTAL HxCDD 

TOTAL HpCDD 

TOTAL TCDF 

TOTAL PeCDF 

TOTAL HxCDF 

TOTAL HpCDF 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m 

TOTAL TEQs (g/s) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

3

) 

? @ 7 % 02 ) 

2,310 

2,770 

3,040 

1,220 

4,400 

1,240 

552 

143 

O.OE+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

O.OE+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.03 

0.05 

2.5E-10 

2,170 

2,650 

3,040 

1,220 

4,490 

1,250 

565 

159 

0.0E+00 

O.OE+00 

O.OE+00 

O.OE+00 

O.OE+00 

0.0E+00 

O.OE+00 

O.OE+00 

0.03 

0.05 

2.4E-10 

4,180 

5,110 

5,400 

2,100 

7,690 

2,230 

986 

239 

0.0E+00 

O.OE+00 

O.OE+00 

0.0E+OO 

0.0E+0O 

O.OE+00 

0.0E+00 

0.0E+00 

0.05 

0.09 

4.2E-10 

(a) U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

J:\Air_Tox\Projecl Files\OnyxVDnyx 2002 work\November 2002\Field\Unit 4\[M23 U4.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-7 January, 2003 
ENSR . 

INTERNA TIONAL 

TABLE 2-6 ROTARY KILN UNIT 4 PCDD/PCDF EMISSION RESULTS - CONGENER CLASS TOTALS 

Run No. 

Date 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

Run 1 

21-Nov-02 

09:45 

12:50 

Run 2 

21-Nov-02 

13:52 

17:01 

Run 3 

22-Nov-02 

08:15 

11:20 

Sample Volume 

units 

dscf 150.596 150.067 152.010 

Sample Volume m

3 4.264 4.25 4.30 

Moisture Conter % v/v 33.1 34.0 35.0 

0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 13.5 13.6 13.4 

C 0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 3.9 3.8 4.5 

Isokinetics % 102 101 103 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 19,054 19,141 18,986 

PCDD/PCD F pg/ pg/ pg/ 

Parameters sample ng/m3 sample ng/m3 sample ng/m3 

TOTAL TCDD 2,310 5.4E-01 2,170 5.1 E-01 4,180 9.7E-01 

TOTAL PeCDD 2,770 6.5E-01 2,650 6.2E-01 5,110 1.2E+00 

TOTAL HxCDD 3,040 7.1 E-01 3,040 7.2E-01 5,400 1.3E+00 

TOTAL HpCDD 1,220 2.9E-01 1,220 2.9E-01 2,100 4.9E-01 

OCDD 290 6.8E-02 283 6.7E-02 483 1.1 E-01 

TOTAL TCDF 4,400 1.0E+00 4,490 1.1E+00 7,690 1.8E+00 

TOTAL PeCDF 1,240 2.9E-01 1,250 2.9E-01 2,230 5.2E-01 

TOTAL HxCDF 552 1.3E-01 565 1.3E-01 986 2.3E-01 

TOTAL HpCDF 143 3.4E-02 159 3.7E-02 239 5.6E-02 

OCDF 28 6.6E-03 32 7.5E-03 39 9.1 E-03 

TOTA L tetra-octa (ng/m3) = 3.8 3.7 6.6 

TOTA L tetra-octa (ng/m3 @ 7 % 02 ) = 7.0 7.1 12.2 

TOTA L tetra-octa (g/s) = 3.4E-08 3.4E-08 5.9E-08 

J:\Air_Tox\Projeci Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Fiel<AUnit 4\|M23 U4Jtls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\OnyxU3nyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\ReporftReport 

Nov02.doc 

2-8 January, 2003 
ENSR . 

INTERNA TIONAL 

TABLE 2-7 SUMMARY OF HWC MACT METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 2 

Low Volatile Metals Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

Metals Runl Run2 Average 

As 16.02 6.71 11.37 

Be < 0.06 < 0.06 < 0.06 

Cr 34.95 10.62 22.78 . 

Total LVM < 51.03 < 17.39 < 34.21 

LVM Regulatory Standard = 97 micrograms/m3

 @ 7% O z 

Semi-Volatile Metal Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O 2 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Average 

Pb 7.09 8.21 7.65 

C d 1.04 0.55 0.79 

Total SV M 8.13 8.76 8.44 

S VM Regulatory Standard = 240 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

Mercury Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O 2 

Run 1 Run 2 Average 

127.33 183.51 155.42 

Mercury Regulatory Standard = 130 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\0nyx\0nyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Fie!d\Unit 2\JM29 U2j(ls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worWNovember 2002\ReportNReport 

Nov02.doc 

2-9 January, 2003 
ENfeR . 

INTERNA TIONAL 

Table 2-8 Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 2 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 10:19 14:17 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Volume Metered dcf 82.013 81.870 81.942 

Sample Volume dscf 83.308 80.994 82.151 

Moisture % v/v 40.7 39.4 40.0 

0 2 at Stack % dry 11.00 11.00 11.00 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 343 361 352 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,430 5,306 5,368 

Isokinetics % 105 104 104 

Arsenic CAs) -- LVM 

Quantity Collected pg 27.00 11.00 19.00 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 16.02 6.71 11.37 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.33E-04 9.53E-05 1.64E-04 

g/sec 2.93E-05 1.20E-05 2.07E-05 

Bervllium (Be) — LVM 

Quantity Collected ng < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 < 0.06 < 0.06 < 0.06 

Stack Emission Rate lb/hr < 8.62E-07 < 8.67E-07 < 8.64E-07 

g/sec < 1.09E-07 < 1.09E-07 < 1.09E-07 

Total Chromium (Cr) - LVM 

Quantity Collected pg 58.89 17.39 38.14 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 34.95 10.62 22.78 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 5.08E-04 1.51 E-04 3.29E-04 

g/sec 6.40E-05 1.90E-05 4.15E-05 

Cadmium (Cd) — S V M 

Quantity Collected pg 1.75 0.90 1.33 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 1.04 0.55 0.79 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.51 E-05 7.80E-06 1.14E-05 

g/sec 1.90E-06 9.83E-07 1.44E-06 

Lead (Pb) - S V M 

Quantity Collected Mg 11.95 13.45 12.70 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 7.09 8.21 7.65 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.03E-04 1.17E-04 1.10E-04 

g/sec 1.30E-05 1.47E-05 1.38E-05 

LVM Total = pg/m3 51.03 17.39 34.21 

SVM Total = pg/m3 8.13 8.76 8.44 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\0nyx\0nyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Field\Unit 2\[M29 U2.xls]DATA Pg 1 of 3 

J:\Alr_T6x\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 2-10 

Nov02.doc 

January, 2003 
EtK R 

INTEflH/iriOIVAL 

TABLE 2- 8 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 2 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-NOV-02 20-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 10:19 14:17 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Volume Metered dcf 82.013 81.870 81.942 

Sample Volume dscf 83.308 80.994 82.151 

Moisture % v/v 40.7 39.4 40.0 

0 2 at Stack %dry 11.00 11.00 11.00 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 343 361 352 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,430 5,306 5,368 

Isokinetics % 105 104 104 

Mercury (He) — V M 

Quantity Collected ug 214.6 300.6 257.6 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 127.3 183.5 155.4 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.85E-03 2.60E-03 2.23E-03 

g/sec 2.33E-04 3.28E-04 2.81 E-04 

Antimony (Sb) — 

Quantity Collected ug 0.45 0.15 0.3 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 0.27 0.09 0.2 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.88E-06 1.30E-06 2.59E-06 

g/sec 4.89E-07 1.64E-07 3.26E-07 

Barium (Ba) — 

Quantity Collected ug 31.89 43.39 37.6 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 18.93 26.49 22.7 

Stack Emission Rate lb/hr 2.75E-04 3.76E-04 3.25E-04 

g/sec 3.46E-05 4.74E-05 4.10E-05 

Silver (Ae) -

Quantity Collected pg 6.39 7.39 6.9 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 3.79 4.51 4.2 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 5.51 E-05 6.40E-05 5.96E-05 

g/sec 6.94E-06 8.07E-06 7.51 E-06 

Thallium (Ti) -

Quantity Collected pg < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.5 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 < 0.30 < 0.31 < 0.3 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 4.31 E-06 < 4.33E-06 < 4.32E-06 

g/sec < 5.43E-07 < 5.46E-07 < 5.45E-07 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workANovember 2002\Field\Unit 2\[M29 U2 jcls]DATA Pg 2 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Projeci FiJes\Onyx\Onyx 2002 wo/x\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.dcx: 

2-11 January, 2003 
EMIR . 

mrefifi/ATioNAL 

TABLE 2- 8 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 2 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 10:19 14:17 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Volume Metered dcf 82.013 81.870 81.942 

Sample Volume dscf 83.308 80.994 82.151 

Moisture % v/v 40.7 39.4 40.0 

0 2 at Stack %dry 11.00 11.00 11.00 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 343 361 352 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,430 5,306 5,368 

Isokinetics % 105 104 104 

Nickel (Nil -

Quantity Collected ug 35.4 37.39 36.4 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 21.0 22.82 21.9 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.05E-04 3.24E-04 3.15E-04 

g/sec 3.84E-05 4.08E-05 3.96E-05 

Selenium (Se) — 

Quantity Collected pg 3.60 2.10 2.9 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 2.14 1.28 1.7 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.10E-05 1.82E-05 2.46E-05 

g/sec 3.91 E-06 2.29E-06 3.10E-06 

• 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\0nyx\0nyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Field\Unil 2\[M29 U2J<1S]DATA Pg 3 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 2-12 

Nov02.doc 

January, 2003 
INTERNATIONAL 

Table 2-9 Summary of HWC MACT Metals Emissions for Unit 3 

Low Volatile Metals Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O; ! 

Metals Runl Run2 Average 

As 1.32 2.54 1.93 

Be < 0.07 < 0.08 < 0.07 

Cr 9.48 10.98 10.23 

Total LVM < 10.86 < 13.61 < 12.23 

LVM Regulatory Standard = 97 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

Semi-Volatile Metal Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O 2 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Average 

Pb 3.06 3.08 3.07 

Cd 1.98 1.31 1.64 

Total SV M 5.04 4.39 4.71 

S VM Regulatory Standard = 240 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

Mercury Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O, 2 

Run 1 Run 2 Average 

85.86 116.85 101.35 

Mercury Regulatory Standard = 130 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Field\Unit 3U.M29 U3 jdsJDATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project files\0nyx\0nyx 2002 worWNovember 2002\Repcrt\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-13 January, 2003 
ENS ? 

INTERNA TIONAL 

TABLE 2-10 SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 3 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 19-Nov-02 19-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:35 

Stop Time 11:52 15:45 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.75 29.75 

Volume Metered dcf 94.897 82.468 88.683 

Sample Volume dscf 95.017 81.448 88.233 

Moisture % v/v 37.3 37.5 37.4 

0 2 at Stack % dry 13.10 13.60 13.35 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 328 355 342 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 6,027 5,602 5,814 

Isokinetics % 106 99 103 

Arsenic (As) — LVM 

Quantity Collected M9 2.00 3.10 2.55 

Stack Cone. @ 7% O z pg/m3 1.32 2.54 1.93 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.68E-05 2.82E-05 2.25E-05 

g/sec 2.11 E-06 3.55E-06 2.83E-06 

Beryllium (Be) — L VM 

Quantity Collected ug < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 < 0.07 < 0.08 < 0.07 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 8.39E-07 < 9.10E-07 < 8.74E-07 

g/sec < 1.06E-07 < 1.15E-07 < 1.10E-07 

Total Chromium (Cr) - L VM 

Quantity Collected pg 14.39 13.39 13.89 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 9.48 10.98 10.23 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.21 E-04 1.22E-04 1.21 E-04 

g/sec 1.52E-05 1.53E-05 1.53E-05 

Cadmium (Cd) -- S V M 

Quantity Collected Mg 3.00 1.60 2.30 

Stack Cone. @ 7% O z Mg/m3 1.98 1.31 1.64 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.52E-05 1.46E-05 1.99E-05 

g/sec 3.17E-06 1.83E-06 2.50E-06 

Lead (Pb) - S V M 

Quantity Collected pg 4.65 3.75 4.20 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 3.06 3.08 3.07 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.90E-05 3.41 E-05 3.66E-05 

g/sec 4.92E-06 4.30E-06 4.61 E-06 

LVM Total = Mg/m3 10.86 13.61 12.23 

SVM Total = Mg/m3 5.04 4.39 4.71 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Noverriber 2Q02\Field\Unlt 3\[M29 U3.xls]DATA Pg 1 of 3 

J:\Air_TcortProject Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-14 January, 2003 
INTERNA TIONAL 

TABLE 2-10 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 3 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 19-NOV-02 19-NOV-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:35 

Stop Time 11:52 15:45 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.75 29.75 

Volume Metered dcf 94.897 82.468 88.683 

Sample Volume dscf 95.017 81.448 88.233 

Moisture % v/v 37.3 37.5 37.4 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.10 13.60 13.35 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 328 355 342 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 6,027 5,602 5,814 

Isokinetics % 106 99 103 

Mercury (He) — V M 

Quantity Collected P9 130.4 142.5 136.4 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 85,9 116.8 101.4 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.09E-03 1.30E-03 1.19E-03 

g/sec 1.38E-04 1.63E-04 1.51 E-04 

Antimony (Sb) — 

Quantity Collected M9 0.18 6.91 3.5 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 0.12 5.67 2.9 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.51 E-06 6.29E-05 3.22E-05 

g/sec 1.90E-07 7.92E-06 4.06E-06 

Barium (Ba) — 

Quantity Collected M9 48.39 45.39 46.9 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 31.87 37.23 34.6 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 4.06E-04 4.13E-04 4.09E-04 

g/sec 5.12E-05 5.20E-05 5.16E-05 

Silver (Ae) -

Quantity Collected pg 148.39 49.39 98.9 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 97.73 40.51 69.1 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.25E-03 4.49E-04 8.47E-04 

g/sec 1.57E-04 5.66E-05 1.07E-04 

Thallium (Tl) -

Quantity Collected pg < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.5 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 < 0.33 < 0.41 < 0.4 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 4.20E-06 < 4.55E-06 < 4.37E-06 

g/sec < 5.29E-07 < 5.73E-07 < 5.51E-07 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worWNovember 2002\Field\Unit 3\(M29 U3.xls]DATA Pg 2 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\ReporRReport 

Nov02.doc 

2-15 January, 2003 
Etftt t 

IN TER fl A TIONAL 

TABLE 2-10 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 3 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 19-Nov-02 19-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:35 

Stop Time 11:52 15:45 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.75 29.75 

Volume Metered dcf 94.897 82.468 88.683 

Sample Volume dscf 95.017 81.448 88.233 

Moisture %v/v 37.3 37.5 37.4 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.10 13.60 13.35 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 328 355 342 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 6,027 5,602 5,814 

Isokinetics % 106 99 103 

Nickel (Ni) -

Quantity Collected ug 42.39 42.39 42.4 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 27.9 34.77 31.3 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.56E-04 3.86E-04 3.71 E-04 

g/sec 4.48E-05 4.86E-05 4.67E-05 

Selenium (Se) — 

Quantity Collected pg 1.10 1.00 1.1 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 0.72 0.82 0.8 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 9.23E-06 9.10E-06 9.16E-06 

g/sec 1.16E-06 1.15E-06 1.15E-06 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workANovember 2002\Fidd\Unit 3\[M29 U3jdslDATA Pg 3 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worirtNovember 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-16 January, 2003 
INTERNA TIONAL 

Table 2-11 SUMMARY OF HWC MACT METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 4 

Low Volatile Metals Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

Metals Runl Run2 Runs 3 Average 

As 1.71 1.33 1.29 1.44 

Be < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.07 

Cr 7-77 8.00 10.47 8.75 

Total LV M < 9.55 < 9.40 < 11.83 < 10.26 

LVM Regulatory Standard = 97 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

Semi-Volatile Metal Emissions 

micrograms/m3 (6 } 7% 0 2 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Runs 3 Average 

Pb 8.50 10.14 6.29 8.31 

Cd 0.75 0.41 0.31 0.49 

Total SV M 9.25 10.55 6.60 8.80 

S V M Regulatory Standard = 240 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 0 2 

Mercury Emissions 

micrograms/m } 7% 0 2 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

27.50 332.19 587.69 459.17 

Mercury Regulatory Standard = 130 micrograms/m3 @ 7% Q 2 

J:\Air_Tox\Projecl Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Field\Unit 4\[M29 U4.xls]EMISSpg2 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\ReporriReport 

Nov02.doc 

2-17 January, 2003 
ENS * 

INTERNA T/ONAL 

TABLE 2-12 SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 21-Nov-02 21-Nov-02 22-NOV-0 2 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Stop Time 11:40 15:59 10:22 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters --

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.70 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 95.992 93.707 93.878 94.526 

Sample Volume dscf 96.570 95.177 95.637 95.795 

Moisture % v/v 33.2 34.8 35.4 34.5 

0 2 at Stack % dry 13.50 13.60 13.40 13.50 

Avg. Stack Temp. "F 386 384 391 387 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 18,904 18,781 18,618 18,768 

Isokinetics % 98 97 99 98 

Arsenic tAs) — LVM 

Quantity Collected M9 2.50 1.90 1.90 2.10 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 1.71 1.33 1.29 1.44 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 6.47E-05 4.96E-05 4.89E-05 5.44E-05 

g/sec 8.16E-06 6.25E-06 6.16E-06 6.86E-06 

Beryllium (Be) -- LVM 

Quantity Collected M9 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.07 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 2.59E-06 < 2.61 E-06 < 2.58E-06 < 2.59E-06 

g/sec < 3.26E-07 < 3.29E-07 < 3.24E-07 < 3.27E-07 

Total Chromium fCr) - LVM 

Quantity Collected pg 11.39 11.39 15.39 12.72 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 7.77 8.00 10.47 8.75 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.95E-04 2.97E-04 3.96E-04 3.30E-04 

g/sec 3.72E-05 3.75E-05 4.99E-05 4.15E-05 

Cadmium (Cd) — S V M 

Quantity Collected pg 1.10 0.58 0.45 0.71 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 0.75 0.41 0.31 0.49 

Stack Emission Rate lb/hr 2.85E-05 1.51 E-05 1.16E-05 1.84E-05 

g/sec 3.59E-06 1.91 E-06 1.46E-06 2.32E-06 

Lead(Pb) - S V M 

Quantity Collected pg 12.45 14.45 9.25 12.05 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 8.50 10.14 6.29 8.31 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.22E-04 3.77E-04 2.38E-04 3.13E-04 

g/sec 4.06E-05 4.75E-05 3.00E-05 3.94E-05 

LVM Total = pg/m3 9.55 9.40 11.83 10.26 

SVM Total = pg/m3 9.25 10.55 6.60 8.80 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Field\Unlt 4\[M29 U4.xls]Summary (continued) Pg 1 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Rsport\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-18 January, 2003 
ENSR . 

/HTERNAriO/ML 

TABLE 2-12 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 21-Nov-02 21-Nov-02 22-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Stop Time 11:40 15:59 10:22 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.70 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 95.992 93.707 93.878 94.526 

Sample Volume dscf 96.570 95.177 95.637 95.795 

Moisture % v/v 33.2 34.8 35.4 34.5 

O z at Stack %dry 13.50 13.60 13.40 13.50 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386 384 391 387 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 18,904 18,781 18,618 18,768 

Isokinetics % 98 97 99 98 

Mercury (Hg) — V M 

Quantity Collected ug 40.3 473.2 864.0 459.2 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 27.5 332.2 587.7 315.8 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.04E-03 1.24E-02 2.22E-02 1.19E-02 

g/sec 1.31 E-04 1.56E-03 2.80E-03 1.50E-03 

Antimony (Sb) — 

Quantity Collected pg 0.08 < 0.53 < 0.52 < 0.38 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 0.05 < 0.37 < 0.35 < 0.26 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.07E-06 < 1.38E-05 < 1.34E-05 < 9.77E-06 

g/sec 2.61 E-07 < 1.74E-06 < 1.69E-06 < 1.23E-06 

Barium (Ba) — 

Quantity Collected pg 38.39 39.39 40.39 39.39 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 26.21 27.65 27.47 27.11 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 9.94E-04 1.03E-03 1.04E-03 1.02E-03 

g/sec 1.25E-04 1.30E-04 1.31 E-04 1.29E-04 

Silver (Ag) -

Quantity Collected pg 62.39 17.39 0.39 26.72 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 42.59 12.21 0.27 18.35 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.62E-03 4.54E-04 1.00E-05 6.93E-04 

g/sec 2.04E-04 5.72E-05 1.27E-06 8.73E-05 

Thallium (Tl) -

Quantity Collected pg < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 

Stack Cone. @ 7% O z pg/m3 < 0.34 < 0.35 < 0.34 < 0.34 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 1.29E-05 < 1.31 E-05 < 1.29E-05 < 1.30E-05 

g/sec < 1.63E-06 < 1.64E-06 < 1.62E-06 < 1.63E-06 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Field\Unit 4\(M29 U4.xls]EMISSpg2 (continued) Pg 2 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Novembef 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.dcx: 

2-19 January, 2003 
Efft R 

INTERNA TIONAL 

TABLE 2-12 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL METALS EMISSIONS FOR UNIT 4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 21-Nov-02 21-Nov-02 22-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Stop Time 11:40 15:59 10:22 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.70 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 95.992 93.707 93.878 94.526 

Sample Volume dscf 96.570 95.177 95.637 95.795 

Moisture % v/v 33.2 34.8 35.4 34.5 

O z at Stack %dry 13.50 13.60 13.40 13.50 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386 384 391 387 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 18,904 18,781 18,618 18,768 

Isokinetics % 98 97 99 98 

Nickel (Ni) -

Quantity Collected P9 29.4 31.39 30.39 30.4 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 20.1 22.03 20.67 20.9 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 7.61 E-04 8.19E-04 7.83E-04 7.88E-04 

g/sec 9.59E-05 1.03E-04 9.86E-05 9.92E-05 

Selenium (Se) — 

Quantity Collected pg < 1.00 < 1.00 < 1.00 < 1.00 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 < 0.68 < 0.70 < 0.68 < 0.69 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 2.59E-05 < 2.61 E-05 < 2.58E-05 < 2.59E-05 

g/sec < 3.26E-06 < 3.29E-06 < 3.24E-06 < 3.27E-06 

............ . • . ; .; 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worttNovember 2002\Field\Unit 4\(M29 U4.xls]Surnrnary Pg 3 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Reporf\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-20 January, 2003 
ENSR . 

INTERNA TIONAL 

Table 2-13 PM/HCI/CI 2 EMISSION RESULTS FOR UNIT 2 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 10:19 14:17 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Volume Metered dcf 79.501 81.652 80.577 

Volume of Gas Collected dscf 78.382 79.074 78.728 

Moisture % v/v 42.0 37.2 39.6 

0 2 at Stack %dry 11.00 11.00 11.00 

C 0 2 a t Stack % dry 4.70 4.10 4.40 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 350 373 361 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,942 5,311 5,126 

Isokinetics % 107 100 103 

Particulate Emission Results — 

Front Half Rinse mg 2.6 10.8 6.7 

Particulate Filter mg 1.5 2.0 1.8 

Total Particulate mg 4.1 12.8 8.5 

P M Loading @ 7% 0 2 mg/dscm 2.6 8.0 5.3 

Grain Loading gr/dscf 0.0008 0.0025 0.0016 

Grain Loading @ 7% 0 2 gr/dscf 0.0011 0.0035 0.0023 

Grain Loading @ 12% C0 2 gr/dscf 0.0021 0.0073 0.0047 

Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.03 0.11 0.1 

HCI Emission Results — 

Total HCI Detected 17,500 34,000 25750 

Total HCI Concentration ppm 5.18 9.98 7.58 

Cone. @ 7% 0 2 ppm 7.26 13.98 10.62 

HCI Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.146 0.302 0.224 

CI, Emission Results — 

Total Cl 2 Detected pg 470 485 478 

Total Cl 2 Concentration ppm 0.07 0.07 0.07 

Cone. @ 7% 0 2 ppm 0.10 0.10 0.10 

C l 2 Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.004 0.004 0.004 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workXNovember 2002\Field\Unit 2\[M29 U2jds]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Projea Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Repx3rt\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-21 January, 2003 
EPK R 

INTERNA TIONAL 

Table 2-14 PM/ HCI / Cl 2 EMISSION RESULTS FOR UNIT 3 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 19-NOV-02 19-NOV-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:35 

Stop Time 11:52 15:45 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.75 29.75 

Volume Metered dcf 86.753 79.200 82.977 

Volume of Gas Collected dscf 84.762 76.861 80.812 

Moisture % v/v 38.4 38.5 38.5 

0 2 at Stack %dr y 13.10 13.60 13.35 

C O z at Stack %dr y 4.30 3.40 3.85 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 331 361 346 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,314 5,210 5,262 

Isokinetics % 107 99 103 

Particulate Emission Results — 

Front Half Rinse mg 3.0 3.8 3.4 

Particulate Filter mg 0.1 0.5 0.3 

Total Particulate mg 3.1 4.3 3.7 

P M Loading @ 7% 0 2 mg/dscm 2.3 3.7 3.0 

Grain Loading gr/dscf 0.0006 0.0009 0.0007 

Grain Loading @ 7% 0 2 gr/dscf 0.0010 0.0016 0.0013 

Grain Loading @ 12% C0 2 gr/dscf 0.0016 0.0030 0.0023 

Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.03 0.04 0.0 

HCI Emission Results — 

Total HCI Detected M9 1,300 27,500 14400 

Total HCI Concentration ppm 0.36 8.31 4.33 

Cone. @ 7% O z ppm 0.63 15.72 8.17 

HCI Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.011 0.247 0.129 

CI, Emission Results — 

Total Cl 2 Detected Mg 500 515 508 

Total Cl 2 Concentration ppm 0.07 0.08 0.08 

Cone. @ 7% 0 2 ppm 0.13 0.15 0.14 

C l 2 Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.004 0.005 0.004 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worttNovember 2002\Field\Unit 3\(M29 U3.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Projed F]les\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-22 January, 2003 
EPKR . 

INTERNATIONAL 

Table 2-15 PM/ HCI / Cl 2 EMISSION RESULTS FOR UNIT 4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 21-Nov-02 21-Nov-02 22-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Stop Time 11:40 15:59 10:22 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.70 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 90.254 88.551 91.219 90.008 

Volume of Gas Collected dscf 88.647 88.065 91.329 89.347 

Moisture % v/v 35.0 35.5 36.1 35.5 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.50 13.60 13.40 13.50 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 3.90 3.80 4.50 4.07 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 389 385 392 389 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 17,330 17,386 17,597 17,438 

Isokinetics % 98 97 100 99 

Particulate Emission Results — 

Front Half Rinse mg 4.1 3.9 6.5 4.8 

Particulate Filter mg 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 

Total Particulate mg 5.2 4.8 7.5 5.8 

P M Loading @ 7% 0 2 mg/dscm 3.9 3.6 5.3 4.3 

Grain Loading gr/dscf 0.0009 0.0008 0.0013 0.0010 

Grain Loading @ 7% 0 2 gr/dscf 0.0017 0.0016 0.0023 0.0019 

Grain Loading @ 12% C0 2 gr/dscf 0.0028 0.0027 0.0034 0.0029 

Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.15 

HCI Emission Results — 

Total HCI Detected ug 24,000 20,500 25,000 23,167 

Total HCI Concentration ppm 6.29 5.41 6.36 6.02 

Cone. @ 7% 0 2 ppm 11.73 10.23 11.71 11.22 

HCI Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.621 0.535 0.637 0.598 

CI, Emission Results — 

Total Cl 2 Detected ug 435 500 510 482 

Total Cl 2 Concentration ppm 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 

Cone. @ 7% 0 2 ppm 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.12 

C l 2 Emission Rate Ib/hr 0.011 0.013 0.013 0.012 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Fi1es\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Field\Unit 4\fM26 U4.xls]EMISSIONS 

J:\Air_Tox\Projed Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

2-23 January, 2003 
Et« t 

WTEKNAriOHJIL 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

3.1 Sampling Procedures 

Several different sampling and monitoring techniques were used to provide the required data to meet 

the goals of this test program. Two (2) runs were conducted on Unit 2 and Unit 3 at one operating 

condition established by Onyx. Three (3) runs were conducted on Unit 4. The sampling activities 

described below were conducted during all runs. All field activities were documented in accordance 

with EP A accepted procedures and copies of all field notes and data sheets are included in Appendix 

A ofthis report. 

3.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 

G a s stream velocity and temperature were determined in conjunction with each manual sampling 

method. A type "S" pitot tube connected to an inclined water manometer was used to determine 

velocity head of the flue gas at each duct traverse point as specified in EP A Reference Method 2. The 

temperature profile of the flue gas at each duct traverse point was obtained by taking readings with a 

thermocouple and pyrometer concurrent with the velocity head measurements. Moisture content was 

determined as specified in EP A Method 4. Velocity and temperature measurement profiles were 

established prior to testing to aid in sample train set-up. Samples for the determination of the fixed gas 

composition were collected using the integrated bag technique detailed in EP A Reference Method 3. 

3.1.2 PCDD/PCDF Sampling 

Sampling for dioxins and furans was completed in accordance with EP A Method 23A (40 CF R 60, 

Appendix A). On all Units, each sampling run was 3 hours in duration covering 12 sampling points at 

15 minutes per point. 

3.1.3 Metals Sampling 

The EP A Multiple Metals Train (EPA Method 29, 40 CF R 60 Appendix A) was utilized during the 

testing program for the collection of the following metals: antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, 

cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver and thallium. Each run was 2-hr in 

duration covering 12 sampling points at 10 minutes per point. 

3.1.4 PM/HCI/CI2 Sampling Procedure 

Sampling for particulate matter (PM), hydrogen chloride (HCI), Chlorine (Cl 2 ) was performed in 

accordance with EP A Method 26A. This procedure allows for the collection of HCI in 0.1 N H 2 S 0 4 

impinger solutions (1s t three impingers) and Cl 2 in the final two impingers containing 0.1 N NaOH . 

Each run was 2-hr in duration covering 12 sampling points at 10 minutes per point. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worit\November 20O2\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

3-1 January, 2003 
ENSR . 

INTE/tNATIOf/AL 

3.2 Analytical Procedures 

3.2.1 PCDD/PCDF Analyses 

Method 0023A samples were analyzed by EP A Method 8290 (high resolution Gas Chromatograph 

(GC)/Mass Spectropotometer (MS)). The train fractions recovered for analysis of PCDDs/PCDF s 

include the front half rinses, the particulate filter and the XA D resin trap. The analytical results for each 

sample fraction were combined into a single analytical result for each run. PCDD/PCD F analyses 

were performed by Alta Analytical Laboratory, Inc. in El Dorado Hills, CA . 

3.2.2 Metals Analyses 

Metals analyses for the waste feed samples were completed using two separate procedures. First, 

samples were prepared and analyzed for antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, 

lead, nickel, selenium, silver and thallium as specified in EP A Method 6020 (ICP-MS), SW846 , 3 r d 

Edition. Mercury was analyzed via method 7471A and Selenium was analyzed by Graphite 

Fumace/Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Metals analyses were performed by PS C Analytical 

Inc. of Burlington, Ontario (Canada). 

3.2.3 PM/HCI/CI2 Analysis 

Sample analysis for (PM), (HCI), and (Cl 2 ) were conducted in accordance with EP A Method 26A, with 

gravimetric analysis for particulate as per EP A Method 5 (40 CF R 60, Appendix A). Analysis for HCI 

and Cl 2 followed EP A Method 9057. Analysis was also performed by PS C Analytical Services Inc. of 

Burlington, Ontario (Canada). 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

3-2 January, 2003 
ENSR . 

INTERNA TIONAL 

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 

4.1 Introduction 

This section presents the results of all QA/Q C measures implemented during the field sampling 

program and all phases of subsequent analysis. Data generated for the program are judged to be 

valid as overall accuracy and precision results are consistent with general objectives. Analytical 

QA/Q C data are presented to support all sample results used for determining compliance with 

performance criteria or emission standards. 

4.2 Stack Sampling QA/QC 

The stack sampling program incorporated a variety of measures to ensure that sound data would be 

obtained. All samples were collected at the stack sampling locations as planned and in accordance 

with applicable method procedures. One field blank for the entire sampling event was submitted for 

analysis along with program samples. 

Sampling QA/Q C measure for this program included calibration of all applicable sampling equipment 

used as described below. Field equipment were calibrated according to EP A procedures specified in 

EPA-60074-77-027b (August 1977) and 40 CF R 60, Methods 1-5, as well as manufacturer's 

specifications. 

1) Drv Gas Meters and Orifice Meters (EPA Method 5 Type) The dry gas meters for all sampling 

trains were calibrated against a wet test meter which had been calibrated against a spirometer. 

The orifice meters were calibrated against the wet test meter and checked against the dry gas 

meter to which they were attached. Meter boxes are calibrated annually and then verified by use 

of the Alternative Method 5 post-test calibration procedure. This procedure is based on the 

principles of the optional pretest orifice meter coefficient check outlined in 40 CFR , Appendix A, 

Method 5, Section 4.4.1. The average Y-value obtained by this method must be within 5% of the 

initial Y-value. The calculations provided with the data sheets in Appendix A show that this 

criterion was met for all isokinetic sampling trains used on the program except Box # 80754. 

Consequently, a post calibration was performed on Box # 80754. The resultant DG M calibration 

factor and Delta H was entered in the isokinetic spreadsheet. Since the sample volume was less 

using the re-calibration data, this value was utilized for emission calculations in accordance with 

the method criteria. 

2) 2) Sampling Nozzles. Each glass nozzle's internal diameter is measured to 0.001 inches 

along three (3) points of the circumference with a Dial Caliper. The three (3) measurements are 

then averaged and the nozzles are identified with unique identification numbers. 

3) Balance. The analytical balance used in the field to determine initial and final silica gel weights is 

calibrated against Clas s M weights provided by the Mettler Corporation. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 wortrtNovember 2002\Report\Report 

Nov02.doc 

4-1 January, 2003 
ENSR. 

INTERNA TIONAL 

4) Thermocouples. Type K thermocouples in each meter control box, heated sample box, impinger 

umbilical connector and sample probes are calibrated against AST M mercury-in-glass 

thermometers at three points: an ice bath, ambient temperature and a boiling water bath. 

Calibration data are provided in Appendix C . 

5) Pitot Tube. Each S-type stainless steel pitot tube used is designed to meet geometric 

configurations as defined in EP A Method 2. Calibration sheets are provided in Appendix C . 

4.3 Chain-of-Custody * 

Chain-of-custody procedures were followed for all samples as follows: 

• Each isokinetic train was set-up and recovered in a clean area adjacent to the incinerators. 

• Samples were collected, sealed and labeled appropriately. 

• All samples were packed in bubble wrap or other absorbent material and placed in either 

sample coolers or appropriate DO T shipping packages (dangerous goods items). 

• All samples were subsequently shipped via Priority Overnight FedEx service to the designated 

laboratory. 

4.4 Analytical QA/QC 

Data Quality Indicators (DQI's) were utilized throughout the program to assess the validity of analytical 

data. This section provides a review of these indicators and the subsequent impact on the analytical 

data. 

4.4.1 Analysis for Metals 

Evaluation of the validity of metals data resulting from the analysis of the Method 0060 sampling train 

samples was based on the following two sets of DQI's: 

• Recoveries of internal, pre-spike and alternate recovery standards added to the samples prior 

to sampling. Recoveries of these standards are included with other Philip Analytical Services 

data in Appendix D. 

• Results of analyses of field and method blank samples for metals. These results are included 

in Appendix D. 

On the basis of these Q C results, no sample analyses were rejected and all the data were determined 

to be valid. Completeness was therefore determined to be 100% for all metals results from all 

samples. 

J:\Air_Tox\Projec) Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worttNovember 2002\Reporf\Report 

Nov02.doc 

4-2 January, 2003 
EHS R 

mrEKMATIONAL 

4.4.2 Analysis for PCDDs/PCDFs 

Evaluation of the validity of the PCDD/PCD F data resultant from the analysis of the Method 23A 

sampling train samples was based on four sets of DQIs. These were: 

• Recoveries of intemal, pre-spike surrogates and alternate recovery standards added to the 

samples prior to sampling; 

• Results of analysis of Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) for the 17 PCDD/PCD F isomers listed in 

E P A Method 23; 

• Results of analyses of field and method blank samples for PCDD/PCDFs . 

These results are included with the Alta Analytical Data Report included in Appendix D. On the basis 

of these Q C results, no sample analyses were rejected and all the data were determined to be valid. 

4.4.3 Analysis for Particulate Matter 

Evaluation of results of gravimetric analysis of Method 26A samples was based on routine laboratory 

practices and processing of lab blank and field blank samples. Minimal particulate contamination was 

observed in both the lab acetone blank and the field acetone blank sample, and thus blank correction 

up to the maximum allowed by the method (0.01 mg/g) was performed. The blank filter weight was 

within acceptable tolerances and required no blank correction. Additional Q C measures followed by 

the gravimetric lab, such as maintenance of proper ambient conditions and use of standard weights, 

ensured valid data. 

4.4.4 Analysis for HCI/CI2 

Evaluation of the validity of analysis of Method 26A train samples was based on three sets of 

objectives. These were: 

• Result s of analysis of blank spikes and matrix spike samples . 

• Result s from the duplicate analysis of all samples . 

• Result s of analysis of field blank samples . 

An accuracy goal of +10% is generally established for chlorides in stack sample analyses conducted 

for this type of program. Recoveries for all blank spikes met these criteria. Also, field and method 

blank samples were free of contamination as shown in the table. No sample analyses were rejected, 

and all results were determined to be valid. Completeness was therefore determined to be 100% for 

all results from the Method 26A trains for chloride analysis. 

J:\Air_Tox\Prpject Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002\Reporf\Report 

Nov02.doc 

4-3 January, 2003 
APPENDI X A 

FIELD DAT A SHEET S 
) 
Method 23A Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #2 [wl Meter Box 80754 re-callibration) 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 11:31 15:18 AVG S 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.426 0.426 0.426 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Net Sampling Time min. 180.0 180.0 180.0 

Volume Metered dcf 139.220 122.861 131.041 

Avg. DG M Temp. °F 58.6 71.4 65.0 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 1.89 1.41 1.65 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1391 0.1036 0.1213 

- -*-DG M e^libratiortPactor-*-**^ -«wkQQ24—-- 1.0024 1.0024 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 141.218 121.479 131.348 

Total Water Collected mL 1899.5 1587.0 1743.3 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 89.561 74.827 82.194 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 38.8 38.1 38.5 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.0 101.0 101.0 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.6119 0.6188 0.6154 

C O z at Stack %dry 4.70 4.10 4.40 

0 2 at Stack %dry 11.00 11.00 11.00 

C O + N 2 %dry 84.30 84.90 84.60 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.19 29.10 29.14 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.85 24.87 24.86 

Excess Air at Stack % 97.7 96.4 97.1 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H z O 0.29 0.33 0.31 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.62 29.62 29.62 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 344.1 370.8 357.4 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.4121 0.3613 0.3867 

S D E Average — 11.687 10.412 11.049 

Pitot Coefficient „ 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Ga s Velocity afpm 1,856 1,653 1,755 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 15,399 13,714 14,556 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 10,011 8,630 9,320 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 6,126 5,341 5,733 

Isokinetics % 107 106 107 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 

Delta H @ in. Hg 1.9050 1.9050 — 

J:\Airjrox\Prqe<^Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 vrorttNovember 2002\Field\UnK 2V.M29 U2jds]DATA 
Method 23A Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #2 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-NOV-02 20-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 11:31 15:18 AVG S 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.426 0.426 0.426 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Net Sampling Time min. 180.0 180.0 180.0 

Volume Metered dcf 139.220 122.861 131.041 

Avg. DG M Temp. op 58.6 71.4 65.0 

Avg Delta H in H z O 1.89 1.41 1.65 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1391 0.1036 0.1213 

D G M Calibration Factor — 1.0107 1.0107 1.0107 

Gas Sample Volume dsc f 142.387 122.485 132.436 

Total Water Collected mL 1899.5 1587.0 1743.3 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 89.561 74.827 82.194 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 38.6 37.9 38.3 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.0 101.0 101.0 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.6139 0.6208 0.6173 

C O z at Stack %dr y 4.70 4.10 4.40 

0 2 at Stack %dr y 11.00 11.00 11.00 

C O + N 2 %dr y 84.30 84.90 84.60 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.19 29.10 29.14 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.87 24.89 24.88 

Excess Air at Stack % 97.7 96.4 97.1 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H z O 0.29 0.33 0.31 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.62 29.62 29.62 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 344.1 370.8 357.4 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.4121 0.3613 0.3867 

S D E Average — 11.687 10.412 11.049 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Ga s Velocity afpm 1,855 1,652 1,754 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 15,392 13,708 14,550 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 10,006 8,626 9,316 

Stack Flowrate dscf m 6,143 5,355 5,749 

isokinetics % 108 107 107 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 — 

Delta H @ in. Hg 1.9234 1.9234 — 

Field Q A Yqc — 0.953 0.946 0.949 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 5.7% 6.4% 6.1% 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Field\Unit 2\(M23 U2J(1SJDATA 
Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #2 

PT 

RUN 1 AVGS - PCDDs/PCDFs RUN 2 AVGS - PCDDs/PCDFs 

PT DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.18 0.4243 48 42 1.90 340 0.12 0.3464 63 63 1.30 359 

a2 0.18 0.4243 55 44 2.00 340 0.14 0.3742 64 63 1.50 363 

a3 0.17 0.4123 60 48 1.90 342 0.15 0.3873 65 58 1.60 368 

a4 0.17 0.4123 64 51 1.90 344 0.15 0.3873 69 60 1.60 370 

a5 0.16 0.4000 64 53 1.80 345 0.15 0.3873 73 63 1.60 372 

a6 0.17 0.4123 62 53 1.90 345 0.12 0.3464 74 65 1.30 377 

a7 0.17 0.4123 55 53 1.90 340 0.13 0.3606 72 68 1.40 368 

a8 0.17 0.4123 63 54 1.90 345 0.13 0.3606 76 70 1.40 372 

a9 0.19 0.4359 66 55 2.10 346 0.12 0.3464 86 75 1.30 374 

a10 0.17 0.4123 69 57 1.90 346 0.12 0.3464 84 77 1.30 376 

a11 0.16 0.4000 76 65 1.80 348 0.13 0.3606 86 79 1.40 375 

a12 0.15 0.3873 80 70 1.70 348 0.11 0.3317 84 77 1.20 375 

A V G 0.17 0.4121 58.6 1.89 344 0.13 0.3613 71.4 1.41 371 
SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLI irf g FIELD DAT A SHEE T 

j r 

ORSAT DATA 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION 

RUN NUMBER; 

Stack Diameter • Inches: 

OPERATOR: ~T jV,,, ^ , 

START TIME: Y'iS 3 Ujlff 

STOP TIME: <A'4S -^H^^TS T 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

~ STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

~ Pitot Coefficient: 

_ Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

_Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

"Delta H@; 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

• 0. 
ENSR 

INTERNA TIONAL 

SAMPLING TRAIN: fS\ )^7> ArPLANT: OfJ^H 

DATE: \)0\J \ Q 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - Inches 
INTERNA TIONAL. 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: AH 2-3 Recovered by: foUrt^S 

RunNo.V^-rZ'l Date: // fcf RunNo.V2--fl?-~ Date: jl faf) 

XAD Module No.: XAD Module No. : 

Filter No. : * Filter No.: ~~~ 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

. (mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

N?*C fyr*- ^ t£ 

1 #7 

1 0 

2 /(TO 2 1 CTD 

3 I (SO 3 /(TO 

4 O 33.5" 4 0 or 

5 5 0 0 

6 6 

7 7 

DIFF: DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

1 1 1 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) 

•lilt ; 

DIFF: W&B : 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) 

iplllifi l 

DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 7 ^ 7 -1 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

NeTH 2 0 

Gain, mL 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 

m m m m m 
1 

IwJ l 

ORSAT ANALYSIS (EPA METHOD 3) 

I PLANT: OMV^ ~ S**%Jr 

i DATE: hi I?/<>->- ~ ., - -

| LOCATION: 'Uy,, r i SW-K. /u n ^ 3 - W -

| SAMPLE TYPE : ^ufe-fW ,n^y<*«P"few 

I OPERATOR: vT>i MD&fJ 

PRE-LEAK CHECK: 

POST-LEAK CHECK: 

JLNOTE: Valid Leak Check: Liquid level must not fall 

below bottom of capillary tubing in 4 minutes 

and meniscus must not change by more than 

2 mL in 4 minutes. 

DATA CRITERIA -

| CO2: When greater than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

I When less than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

I O21 When greater than or equal to 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

1 When less than 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

L 

I Run # 1 Reading A Reading B i Read ing C Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

| GAS Actual | Net Actual 

i i 

Net Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

CO2 

! ! 

V. 3 - j ^ if ¥ • 3 

O2 * 

t 

(3-0 /3. I 

! Run #2 Reading A I Reading B Read ing C Avg. 

Net 

Volume I 

| GAS 

i 

Actual j Net Actual Net Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume I 

CO2 

••

 { \ i > 3 - 3 

O2 * I3-7 

17.0 0 - 7 

i Run #6! 

1 

Reading A i Reading B Read ing C Avg. 

Net 

Volume• 

G AS Actual Net ! Actual Net Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume• 

CO2 

t - 7 

i 

O2 * 

I 

i i 

) W | \l,0 j i<-^ ii.o j l * 

Net O2 is actual O2 minus actual CO2 reading. 

C:\TEMPLATE\DATASHTS\ORSAT.VVK4 
ORSAT ANALYSIS (EPA METHOD 3) 

PLANT : £Wf X -S**#k 

DATE : (Amy - a- t H j-mA s 

LOCATION: ff/po -

I SAMPLE TYPE /vgJLh t*h,jfJtA fri. NOTE: 

| OPERATOR:. AP/6QJ ^ 

PRE-LEAK CHECK : g'A ^ € f / 

POST-LEAK CHECK: &yA ffi fo. 

Valid Leak Check : Liquid level must not fall 

below bottom of capillary tubing in 4 minutes 

and meniscus must not change by more than 

2 mL in 4 minutes. 

CQ2 

Qzi 

DATA CRITERIA -

When greater than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

When less than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

When greater than or equal to 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

When less than 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

! Run##-

Reading A 

! 

Reading B Read ing C Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

J! 

G A S Actual Net Actual

 : Net 1 I 

Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

CO2 >);•>- V 

j °2 * 6 ' ° I ll * 

i 

)$• * II- 0 

n ° 

Run*!} Reac ing A Reading B Reading C Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

G A S Actual Net Actual ! Net 

j 

Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

CO2 i

; <• V | 3 ^ 

j O2 * 17 3 a- < />£ » 

! Run #3- Read ing A Reading B Read ing C Avg. 

Net 

Volume = 

j

 GA S Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume = 

CO2 3 . r 

_ . _ 

O2 * \3 ^ I 7 . f 13 ^ 

Net O2 is actual O2 minus actual CO2 reading. 

C:\TEMPLATBDATASHTS\0RSAT.WK4 
Method 29 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #2 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 10:19 14:17 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.431 0.431 0.431 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 82.013 81.870 81.942 

Avg. DGM Temp.. °F 60.3 74.1 67.2 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 1.60 1.53 1.56 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1176 0.1121 0.1149 

DGM Calibration Factor — 1.0077 1.0077 1.0077 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 83.308 80.994 82.151 

Total Water Collected mL 1211.9 1117.0 1164.5 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 57.141 52.667 54.904 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 40.7 39.4 40.0 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.0 101.0 101.0 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M 

-

0.5932 0.6060 0.5996 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 4.70 4.10 4.40 

0 2 at Stack %dry 11.00 11.00 11.00 

CO + N 2 %dry 84.30 84.90 84.60 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.19 29.10 29.14 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.64 24.72 24.68 

Excess Air at Stack % 97.7 96.4 97.1 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H 2 0 0.32 0.33 0.33 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.62 29.62 29.62 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 342.6 361.3 352.0 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.3749 0.3634 0.3692 

SDE Average — 10.621 10.414 10.518 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,694 1,658 1,676 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 14,054 13,756 13,905 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,154 8,756 8,955 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,430 5,306 5,368 

Isokinetics % 105 104 104 

Meter Box No. — 80582 80582 -

Delta H @ in H 2 0 1.9233 1.9233 -

Field QA Yqc — 0.9940 0.9867 0.9904 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 1.36% 2.08% 1.72% 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\0nyx\0nyx 2CJ2 wortrtNovember 2002\FIet(MJnit 2\(M29 U2.xls]DATA 
SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLlTTIrTOC - FIELD DAT A SHEE T 

TEST LOCATION 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - inches: 37 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: CfuS ion 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): ' 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pltot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H@: 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

0,84 

INITIAL VAC. _ 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC." 

LEAK CHECKS; 

in. 

in. 

in. 

CFM_ 

CFM" 

'iMpjIjlGER VO.LS t 

f:JNlT.':*rfi»SA'SFT

. 

CFM (Q.t.'O'c -

FILTER DATA 

O. M3 / 

Lt-3 

ORSAT Initial 

ORSAT Final: 

^WPL"E$ 

. - .11 I I P 

^WPL TEMPERATURE READINGS "F "E$ 

. - .11 I I P * h * -< 

-S- v rt * 

G«S METER' '* 

In Ho">, 

^WPL"E$ 

. - .11 I I P 'OLT * In Ho">, 

^WPL"E$ 

. - .11 

I S" 

Z- & 0,15 " 11- 2.co.o / 

*> 76 t.r- ld0.h / 5 » <n / o 

«-/ o.tr -

/> -<uq .0 3 3 f t y ? Ut / U S I /&> 

$ 0.£ " / . 7 22i.G * r / C\~ / o 

55 L<* WSj zs^ 

Ob Lt* "zs~ r •TO 3 S / o 

Z 1.5 5*t r<i 

1 £>. f5~ AT- Z<© V 6 1- 7 

H < ^ LG> 7t>u \ H (b-z 9 

ia& ca/g" t > Q r ) 63 "T 

Cv ut> o . K I.TL J , G 

* 

• 

m fijil.* ^ 

I'CO 

Final Vol 

Rinse 

Volumes 

ORSAT DATA 

c o 2 ; 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: ml. 

WrERA/A rfOJVAL 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: p°vA"\ Recovered by: xT\A * l/IA* 

RunNo. U3- ~ ^ 1 Date: 1 1 \> ° Run No. <^Date : \\\7^> 

XAD Module No.: ~ XAD Module No.: 

Filter No. : R^^ l Filter No.: ^ ^ 1 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

?J£~ 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 

O 

1 

0 

2 fiSV 

•A r 

2 f<sD lt3 

i 

3 3 f*V 1 Sr^ / ( A 

4 0 ~5Z \o£> 4 Q f /(TO 

5 

i / L/ 

5 /'(JO 

6 i<n> 6 /OTP 

7 7 

DIFF: DIFF: 

Totals . Totals 

tilli l 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

•lii i ffiiii 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) tilli l 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

ffiiii 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

W W 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL A'.' , 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 
Method 26A Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Fixed Hearl h Incinerator #2 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 20-Nov-02 20-NOV-02 

Start Time Units 08:15 12:15 

Stop Time 10:19 14:17 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.434 0.434 0.434 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 79.501 81.652 80.577 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 73.0 82.8 77.9 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 1.53 1.63 1.58 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1127 0.1195 0.1161 

DGM Calibration Factor 

-

1.0022 1.0022 1.0022 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 78.382 79.074 78.728 

Total Water Collected mL 1204.3 994.5 1099.4 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 56.783 46.891 51.837 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 42.0 37.2 39.6 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.0 101.0 101.0 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.5799 0.6277 0.6038 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 4.70 4.10 4.40 

0 2 at Stack %dry 11.00 11.00 11.00 

CO + N 2 %dry 84.30 84.90 84.60 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.19 29.10 29.14 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.49 24.97 24.73 

Excess Air at Stack la 97.7 96.4 97.1 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area _ sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H 2 0 0.26 0.25 0.26 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.62 29.62 29.62 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 349.8 373.1 361.4 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.3495 0.3554 0.3525 

S D E Average — 9.946 10.257 10.102 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,591 1.625 1,608 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 13,202 13,484 13,343 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 8,522 8,460 8,491 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,942 5,311 5,126 

Isokinetics % 107 100 103 

Meter Box No. — 80581 80581 — 

Delta H @ in H 2 0 2.0387 2.0387 -

Field QAYq c — 0.9870 0.9998 0.9934 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 1.52% 0.24% 0.88% 

J:\AirJox\Project Rles\0nyx\0ny> 2002 wortrtNovember 2002\Reld\Untt 2\[M29 UZxIsJDATA 
Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #2 

PT 

R U N 1 AVG S - P M / HCI / CI 2 R U N 2 AVG S - P M / HCI / Cl 2 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT , 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.11 0.3317 53 52 1.40 338 0.13 0.3606 67 . 66 1.60 357 

a2 0.12 0.3464 69 56 1.50 347 0.13 0.3606 71 67 1.70 368 

a3 0.12 0.3464 75 59 1.50 348 0.13 0.3606 79 69 1.70 371 

a4 0.13 0.3606 79 63 1.60 350 0.12 0.3464 83 71 1.50 374 

a5 0.13 0.3606 82 66 1.60 352 0.13 0.3606 87 74 1.70 377 

a6 0.10 0.3162 84 68 1.30 351 0.10 0.3162 90 77 1.30 377 

a7 0.10 0.3162 79 71 1.30 348 0.12 0.3464 88 78 1.50 373 

a8 0.13 0.3606 83 72 1.60 354 0.15 0.3873 94 81 1.90 373 

a9 0.13 0.3606 86 73 1.60 354 0.15 0.3873 98 82 1.90 376 

a10 0.13 0.3606 85 73 1.60 353 0.13 0.3606 100 85 1.70 378 

a11 0.14 0.3742 87 74 1.80 351 0.12 0.3464 102 86 1.60 377 

a12 0.13 0.3606 88 75 1.60 351 0.11 0.3317 103 88 1.40 376 

AVG 0.12 0.3495 73.0 1.53 350 0.13 0.3554 82.8 1.63 373 

NOTE: DO NOT DELETE ROWS 6 OR 31 IF ADJUSTING FILE FOR ACTUAL NUMBER OF POINTS!!! 
SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPu W G - FIELD DATA SHEET 

LEAK CHECKS: 

in. CFM 

CFM" 

.;MRJ^pRVqC|S& Rinse 

FINAIK Volumes 

o 

/oo 

ORSAT DATA 
E P A ISOK 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

-OHM'S. 

NETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DAT A SHEE T 

LEAK CHECKS: 

TEST LOCATION: Jt 

RUN NUMBER: Zli* £ 

Stack Diameter - Inches: 

0.84 I 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

UrstJ 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: ^fj.QO 

[STATIC PRESSURE (+1/1: ' ""' 

_ Probe/Pitot Number: 

_ Pltot Coefficient: 

[Filter Box No.: HS'/fi 

Meter Box Number: T?tX&A 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): S.xSCAS. 

[Delta H@: £.Ol?7 

[ Nozzle Size: <^~V39' 

_XAD Thermocouple ID: j*t/A\ 

Impinger Outlet ID: t~2~/4> 

INITIAL VAC. 

[ MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

INIT. PITOT 

[ FINAL PITOT 

[ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

In. CFM C>. CX!><r~ 

In. CFM 

In. CFM 

+ 

FILTER DATA 

I—2 •NUMBER' 

r?Ah p -

1

 C T 1 1E 

VELOCTV 

MMpWp 

t p 

a./ 3 

„ ORFTEjSj i 

L h n AC 1 

G«~ VETER 

ft i 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, "F • 

VACUUM 

r?Ah p -

1

 C T 1 1E 

VELOCTV 

MMpWp 

t p 

a./ 3 

„ ORFTEjSj i 

L h n AC 1 

G«~ VETER 

ft i lisp!®! '.FILTER EOX LIIVPINGCR"1 GA& METER-. J ,"i> 

• 

VACUUM 

r?Ah p -

1

 C T 1 1E 

VELOCTV 

MMpWp 

t p 

a./ 3 

„ ORFTEjSj i 

L h n AC 1 

G«~ VETER 

ft i lisp!®! '.FILTER EOX LIIVPINGCR"1 

/ < IN' 

/,7 1 

oirr i 

• 

VACUUM 

/ o 

VELOCTV 

MMpWp 

t p 

a./ 3 

„ ORFTEjSj i 

L h n AC 1 

G«~ VETER 

ft i 

3<T7 3 * 9 /<,(„ 

/ < IN' 

/,7 1 

oirr i 

2 /£> a. f.l /. 7 <t,y SL, '} 7 i f„7 

0./3 . J.7 m,6> All fx* su. 79 <<r.o 

f 3D O, 12. I.S' 3?<S SCO jiss- SI 93 11 

C/2? ci.U 1.7 WI2. 1 3 7 7 7Y 

6 JZ> /.J vr?./ . 377 2SZ, s~*, & 77 X , o 

— . — _ 

. 

I f a. ix i. <r 9YY, T/% TPS Sd cv 7» 

?£> </J7. y VJ . r o 

f %£> J7 X o 

?<S> cs, / 7 1.7 J2SZ> JV X. d> 

s a. iv. 37? ms S7 ZO-2-

& /ie> o.tt 376? Zl&o /G ? . r> o 

. — 

J t 

i 

t 

i 

t 

§ 

§ 

I 

i • 

i 

1 

I " • • 

1 

1 

• 

i 

1 

1 1 . 

J ; 1 mmm 

Rinse 

Volumes 

/•&•& 

<*> 

soo 

1 1 ===!==== 

Final Vol 

'.i/SILICA/ISEL-'. 

9 

ORSAT DATA 

'co 2 ; M I S 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: ml 
PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: pAQ-drV Recovered by: "CT\^ ^t&Z-l-f 

Run No. \)^-~^-\ Date: \\\h> Run No. Date: H |>-© 

XAD Module No.: XAD Module No.: " 

Filter No. : T " F/7/er M>.: "T ~ 

Impinger 

No. 

- - •- - -

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

... (Ey _ 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 1 | 

2 / 0r> 2 //O 

3 I ir o / 3 {0t> 

4 o 3 ^ 2 

4 

o 

(a 

5 j o o /OC? 

I 

5 ( o-o 

6 Joo 6 / O o 

7 7 

DIFF : DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

r.'l.-V>;-;.T Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) 

r.'l.-V>;-;.T Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF : 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

S K ? 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL SflS^. 1

- ^ ! Gain, mL 
Method 23A Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 (w/ Meter Box 80754 re-callibration) 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 19-Nov-02 19-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:35 

Stop Time 12:56 16:37 AVG S 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.432 0.432 0.432 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.75 29.75 

Net Sampling Time min. 180.0 180.0 180.0 

Volume Metered dcf 123.508 122.517 123.013 

Avg. DG M Temp. op 73.2 73.4 73.3 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 1.46 1.40 1.43 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1072 0.1029 0.1051 

D G M Calibration Factor -- 1.0024 1.0024 1.0024 

G a s Sample Volume dsc f 122.347 121.291 121.819 

Total Water Collected mL 1541.3 1517.3 1529.3 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 72.672 71.541 72.106 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 37.3 37.1 37.2 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 100.6 100.6 100.6 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.6274 0.6290 0.6282 

C O z at Stack %dry 4.30 3.40 3.85 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.10 13.60 13.35 

C O + N 2 %dry 82.60 83.00 82.80 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.21 29.09 29.15 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 25.03 24.97 25.00 

Excess Air at Stack % 150.5 163.6 157.0 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H z O -0.16 -0.20 -0.18 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.74 29.74 29.74 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 333.8 344.2 339.0 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.3364 0.3584 0.3474 

S D E Average — 9.476 10.162 9.819 

Pitot Coefficient „ 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Ga s Velocity afpm 1,497 1,607 1,552 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 12,416 13,331 12,873 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 8,209 8,699 8,454 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,150 5,472 5,311 

Isokinetics % 108 100 104 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 — 

Delta H @ in. Hg 1.9050 1.9050 — 

J:\Air_Tox\Prqect Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Field\Unit 3\[M29 U3jds]DATA 
Method 23A Sampling Parameters — 

Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 19-Nov-02 19-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:35 

Stop Time 12:56 16:37 AVG S 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.432 0.432 0.432 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.75 29.75 

Net Sampling Time min. 180.0 180.0 180.0 

Volume Metered dcf 123.508 122.517 123.013 

Avg. DG M Temp. °F 73.2 73.4 73.3 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 1.46 1.40 1.43 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1072 0.1029 0.1051 

D G M Calibration Factor — 1.0107 1.0107 1.0107 

G a s Sample Volume dscf 123.361 122.296 122.828 

Total Water Collected mL 1541.3 1517.3 1529.3 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 72.672 71.541 72.106 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 37.1 36.9 37.0 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 100.6 100.6 100.6 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.6293 0.6309 0.6301 

C O z at Stack % dry 4.30 3.40 3.85 

O z at Stack %dry 13.10 13.60 13.35 

C O + N 2 % dry 82.60 83.00 82.80 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.21 29.09 29.15 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 25.06 25.00 25.03 

Excess Air at Stack % 150.5 163.6 157.0 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H 2 0 -0.16 -0.20 -0.18 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.74 29.74 29.74 

Avg. Stack Temp. op 333.8 344.2 339.0 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P - 0.3364 0.3584 0.3474 

S D E Average — 9.476 10.162 9.819 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Ga s Velocity afpm 1,496 1,606 1,551 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 12,410 13,325 12,868 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 8,205 8,695 8,450 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,163 5,486 5,325 

Isokinetics % 108 101 105 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 -

Delta H @ in. Hg 1.9234 1.9234 --

Field Q A Yqc 0.954 0.945 0.950 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 5.6% 6.5% 6.0% 

J:\Air_Tox\Projed Files\0nyx\0nyx2002 worMNovember2002\Field\Unit 3\[M23 U3.xls)DATA 
f 

i 

Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

PT 

RUN 1 AVGS - PCDDs/PCDFs i RUN 2 AVGS - PCDDs/PCDFs 

PT DP SORT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

al 0.12 0.3464 71 60 1.50 330 0.16 0.4000 63 62 1.70 334 

a2 0.13 0.3606 69 59 1.70 325 0.16 0.4000 76 68 1.70 338 

a3 0.11 0.3317 76 62 1.40 330 0.15 0.3873 80 70 1.70 330 

a4 0.10 0.3162 78 66 1.30 332 0.12 , 0.3464 82 73 1.30 331 

a5 0.09 0.3000 81 69 1.10 334 0.11 ( 0.3317 83 72 1.20 331 

a6 0.07 0.2646 89 75 0.90 340 0.10 s 0.3162 84 73 1.10 333 

a7 0.14 0.3742 85 72 1.80 337 0.12 j 0.3464 76 69 1.30 333 

aB 0.14 0.3742 78 68 1.80 335 0.12 ! 0.3464 79 69 1.30 359 

a9 0.14 0.3742 81 68 1.80 336 0.15 i 0.3873 80 69 1.60 361 

a10 0.12 0.3464 80 68 1.50 336 0.11 : 0.3317 78 68 1.20 362 

all 0.11 0.3317 85 68 1.40 335 0.12 I 0.3464 75 •64 1.30 357 

a12 0.10 0.3162 79 69 1.30 335 0.13 ! 0.3606 80 69 1.40 361 

AVG 0.11 0.3364 73.2 1.46 334 0.13 I 0.3584 73.4 1.40 344 

f 
ENSR, 

t/VTEHNA TiONAL 

SAMPLING TRAIN: (V\ V ^ A 

PLANT: O/V/y " 

DATE: fJ'-" 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: ] 

Stack Diameter - Inches: 

ikJ L 

" 3 ^ 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

(I 

V VELOCITY 

P n 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

_STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): ] 

_ Probe/Pitot Number: 

.Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

_Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

[Delta H@: 

Nozzle Size: 

_XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMK 

IS 

1 FIELD DATA SHEET 

-O \<o 

o.84 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

LEAK CHECKS: 

' O In. CFM o.aOXI. Q\ u~> 

INIT. PITOT 

' FINAL PITOT 

I.

 C\ 1 3 4 

ORSAT Final: 

— in. CFM " — 

In. CFM 0 . 0 O 3 

+ . , 

FILTER DATA 

"NUfill ! TARE 

•• y 

— 

IMPJNG6.R. VOL'S ' 

INIT'."*' 

7 7 ° 

3-3 C> 

SILICA GEL * 

Final Vol 

Rinse 

Volumes 

1 3 2 

Or\ JAT DATA 

c;o2 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: ml. 

m i 

SAMPLE'1 

POINT, 

rCLOCK 

"TIMS'" $ET6&Va|» 

GAS METER 

met 

TEMPERATURE READINGS. *F 

3 f t 

'""PlNGE R -

S 7 

lifftff 

7 1 

_CL l 

F 

VACUUM! 

PUMP 

4 l 4 S 4 ^ . 

T 4 l 

4t 

I T 

T3c T 

1 2 ^ 

7 ? 

I M A 

H i 

2 X 

Ei Ve t 

3 E 

4^4 

§ 1 

3 3 

M 

IT 

2L. 

T H T 

o 

Z 
ens* * 

SAMPLING n i

l A TRAIN 

PLANT: Q A / 

DATE: 

E PA ISOKINETIC SAMPLI 

ORSAT DATA 

TEST LOCATION 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - inches: 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: j SO S 

CO. 
PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train : A l 7~ ? Recovered by: vj~/ fhOiZ/tif 

Run No. Date: i\\ l l RunNo\) 3-/2-> Date: ^ 

XAD Module No. : XAD Module No.: QcJick STSS ~] 

Filter No.: ^ M " Filter No.: " 

Impinger 

No. 

i 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

• J-; 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 0 7 7 0 

1 

0 ^@ *] ^ 

2 f CTD 3&o r 

2 

3 . 3 fen? 

4 

C> 

4 

o a-d-i 

5 5 

6 6 

7 7 

DIFF : DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

-Weight 

(9) 

liiiiili^ Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

-Weight 

(9) DIFF: 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL /SV/. 3 

tSSii f Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL ^^^^ ^ 
110 1 

ORSAT ANALYSIS (EPA METHOD 3) 

0 M f 3 

I PLANT: OMV ^ - j: L PRE-LEAK CHECK: g ^ 

j! DATE: U\11 /cr>. ' 1 POST-LEAK CHECK: ga, 

1 LOCATION : Uy,, ^ Cyt^k /u„. hT f PK-IL. 

j SAMPLE TYPE : t^o^-f^'HT- (^h?ry^4> fe<g_ NOTE: Valid Leak Check: Liquid level must not fall 

OPERATOR: Mfi&iJ below bottom of capillary tubing in 4 minutes 

and meniscus must not change by more than 

2 mL in 4 minutes. 

DATA CRITERIA -

j CO2 : When greater than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less, 

ji When less than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

O 2 ; When greater than or equal to 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

When less than 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

I Run # 1 Reading A Reading B ! Read ing C Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

| GAS Actual j Net Actual ! Net 

! i 

I ! 

Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

CO2 tf. lh 

i 

¥•3 ! 

O2 * Mr > 

i 

n>- (3-0 

! Run # 2 

i 

Reading A I Reading B Read ing C Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

G AS Actual | Net ; Actual 

i j 

Net Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

CO2 

1 ! 

3 3 3 -} 

O2 * /3.5 l (id- on 

17. 0 n.i 

Run#£ i Reading A i Reading B Read ing C Avg. 

Net 

Volume •• 

G AS Actual Net ! Actual Net Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume •• 

CO2 

I 

fa 

1 • 

ft i l 

O2 * ,1.0 

Net O2 is actual O2 minus actual CO2 reading. 

C:\TEMPLATBDATASHTS\ORSAT.WK4 
Method 2 9 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

Onyx , Fixed Heart h Incinerator #3 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 19-Nov-02 19-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:35 

Stop Time 11:52 15:45 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.434 0.431 0.433 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.75 29.75 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 94.897 82.468 88.683 

Avg. DGM Temp. op 71.1 77.8 74.4 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 2.11 1.58 1.84 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1550 0.1158 0.1354 

DGM Calibration Factor — 1.0077 1.0077 1.0077 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 95.017 81.448 88.233 

Total Water Collected mL 1201.0 1036.7 1118.9 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 56.627 48.880 52.754 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 37.3 37.5 37.4 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 100.6 100.6 100.6 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M 

-

0.6266 0.6249 0.6258 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 4.30 3.40 3.85 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.10 13.60 13.35 

CO + N 2 %dry 82.60 83.00 82.80 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.21 29.09 29.15 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 25.03 24.93 24.98 

Excess Air at Stack *" % 150.5 163.6 157.0 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H2 0 -0.10 -0.06 -0.08 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.74 29.75 29.74 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 328.2 355.3 341.7 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P - 0.3926 0.3714 0.3820 

SDE Average 

-

11.023 10.605 10.814 

Pitot Coefficient 

-

0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,741 1,678 1,710 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 14,444 13,921 14,183 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,619 8,964 9,291 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 6,027 5,602 5,814 

Isokinetics % 106 99 103 

Meter Box No. — 80582 80582 -

Delta H @ in H 2 0 1.9233 1.9233 

-

Field QA Yqc -

0.9929 0.9964 0.9947 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 1.47% 1.12% 1.29% 

J:\Air_Tox\Project R!es\0nyx\0nyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Reld\Unit 3\(M29 U3.xls)DATA 
Risk Burn Phase 2 - Test Condition B 

PT 

R U N 1 AVGS-METAL S R U N 2 AVG S -- METAL S 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

31 0.14 0.3742 56 55 1.80 312 0.12 0.3464 70 70 1.30 350 

a2 0.18 0.4243 65 57 2.40 318 0.14 0.3742 76 71 1.60 353 

a3 0.17 0.4123 71 60 2.30 325 0.16 0.4000 79 72 1.80 357 

a4 0.16 0.4000 75 63 2.20 328 0.14 0.3742 82 74 1.60 359 

a5 0.16 0.4000 77 65 2.20 329 0.13 0.3606 82 74 1.50 357 

ae 0.17 0.4123 80 68 2.30 330 0.16 0.4000 83 75 1.80 355 

a7 0.15 0.3873 79 70 2.20 329 0.11 0.3317 79 75 1.30 331 

a8 0.17 0.4123 78 70 2.30 333 0.13 0.3606 81 76 1.50 348 

a9 0.17 0.4123 80 70 2.30 335 0.15 0.3873 83 76 1.70 360 

a10 0.16 0.4000 82 72 2.20 337 0.14 0.3742 85 77 • 1.60 364 

a11 0.13 0.3606 84 73 1.80 338 0.15 0.3873 85 77 1.70 365 

a12 0.10 0.3162 83 74 1.30 324 0.13 0.3606 86 78 1.50 364 

AVG 0.16 0.3926 71.1 2.11 328 0.14 0.3714 77.8 1.58 355 
SAMPLING TRAIN: '/ lgTAt,S 

PLANT: OQY ^ 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION: -fr?, 

RUN NUMBER: [ 

Stack Diameter - Inches: 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

[STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

_ Meter Box Number: 

"orifice Coefficient (Y): 

"Delta H@: 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

LEAK CHECKS: 

7

a

l.'rO INITIAL VAC. j "5 In. CFM Q.O\Q 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. j<-

— in. CFM 

in. CFM 

0.84 

INIT. PITOT 

' FINAL PITOT 

ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

'•NUMBER.' ''"•.TARE-''. 

INIT 

/CO 

F|NAL~| 

1ST 

JE 

2L 

'.••» 'SILICA GEL»-

Final Vol > ' Q 

Volumes 

T 5 F 

ORSAT DATA 

CO. 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: ml. 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, *F ' PIJMP. 

In HT 

52=. -S3-

'•COMMENT-; 

2 . 

C o /5-

?3" 

V<0 £52 

6 5Z> Z-3 5-Z.3 33D s o 

Lo 2.Z, 257 _<£<2_ 2 3 . 

7 0 

•50 

ICO 

IIP c9,fo 

t.-L 

LfS_ 

i-J 

t&:t 

ZMS 

257 

S 3 

J2£ _ / 3 

fa 

/V 
SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: • <Ok>HY 

DATE: 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLI i FIELD! DATA SHEET 

lewis 

TEST LOCATION: OO f »" 5 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter • Inches: 

OPERATOR: SJhrff 

START TIME: rsfll^ 

STOP TIME: 'HS*" (ftrT 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

_ Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

_ Meter Box Number: 

"Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

"Delta H @: 

_ Nozzle Size: 

_XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

- C I 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

' FINAL VAC. 

LEAK CHECKS: 

[5 In. 

•— In. 

In. 

CFM Q.t&S 

CFM — 

CFM £?.<r^^— ' 

:'jMp|N9ERi5iOL'S-.;fi 

INIT5S7.;FINAliS Volumes 

0.84 

INIT. PITOT 

ORSAT Final: 

IT- 5 

-NUMBER. • TAPE 

'• MA -

• 

'•SO 

r"lK> 

.-?-siucA..eEui?; 

Final Vol, 

ORSAT DATA 

CCV • 1 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: ml. 

- M~ ' " J. If! 'Sf CON f'ENTS

 1 
IHJm . 

MreR/v/irfONAL. 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: Recovered by: \f)/ * /M 0 \ $ 

Run No. U3-£ t Date: H / t 1 Run No. U 3 — & 2" Date: j | |/ 7 

XAD Module No.: XAD Module No. 

Filter No. . . /pue^fo Lf^'S'fosri Filter No.: 

Impinger 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

0 1 

I o o S6o |CJD d m 

/

0

 ° "5 

s 

/<5rt> O /<rd 

j o o 

/ c r o 

| o o /cn ) 

DIFF: DIFF 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

•(g) DIFF: 

mm 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF : 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

m . 3 

" ' "ffl 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

V6/.2 . 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL •V. u a 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 
Method 26A Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Run No. 1 2 

Date 19-NOV-02 19-NOV-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:35 

Stop Time 11:52 15:45 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.434 0.434 0.434 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.75 29.75 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 86.753 79.200 82.977 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 81.0 84.2 82.6 

Avg Delta H in HzO 1.87 1.53 1.70 

Avg Delta H 0.1373 0.T121 0.1247 

DGM Calibration Factor — 1.0022 1.0022 1.0022 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 84.762 76.861 80.812 

Total Water Collected mL 1121.8 1021.1 1071.5 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 52.893 48.145 50.519 

Moisture (measured) %v/v 38.4 38.5 38.5 

Moisture (@ saturation) %v/v 100.6 100.6 100.6 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M -- 0.6158 0.6149 0.6153 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 4.30 3.40 3.85 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.10 13.60 13.35 

CO + N 2 %dry 82.60 83.00 82.80 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.21 29.09 29.15 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.90 24.82 24.86 

Excess Air at Stack % 150.5 163.6 157.0 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H 2 0 0.06 -0.10 -0.02 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.75 29.74 29.75 

Avg. Stack Temp. "F 330.9 360.7 345.8 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.3520 0.3515 0.3517 

SDE Average — 9.899 10.068 9.983 

Pitot Coefficient - 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,567 1.597 1,582 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 12,999 13,248 13,124 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 8,630 8,473 8,551 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,314 5,210 5,262 

Isokinetics % 107 99 103 

Meter Box No. — 80581 80581 — 

Delta H @ in H 2 0 2.0387 2.0387 -

Field QA Yqc — 1.0021 0.9976 0.9999 

[Deviation] Pre-Y 0.01% 0.45% 0.23% 

J:\Air_Tox\Prcjecl Fi!es\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 20O2\Fiel(MJnit 3\(M29 U3.xls]DATA 
Onyx, Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

PT 

R U N 1 AVGS --PM/H C :i / ci 2 R U N 2 AVG S — P M / HCI / CI, 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

out 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.14 0.3742 65 63 1.90 316 0.09 0.3000 75 75 1.10 342 

32 0.15 0.3873 74 66 2.10 323 0.09 0.3000 79 75 1.10 353 

a3 0.15 0.3873 81 69 2.10 328 0.13 0.3606 84 77 1.60 357 

a4 0.13 0.3606 86 72 2.00 330 0.13 0.3606 88 79 1.60 362 

a5 0.11 0.3317 90 76 1,70 332 0.13 0.3606 90 81 1.60 363 

a6 0.07 0.2646 88 77 1.10 316 0.14 0.3742 90 82 1.70 361 

a7 0.12 0.3464 83 72 1.80 . 331 0.13 0.3606 85 83 1.60 361 

aS 0.15 0.3873 89 81 2.30 337 0.14 0.3742 90 84 1.70 363 

a9 0.13 0.3606 92 83 2.00 338 0.13 0.3606 91 84 1.60 364 

310 0.13 0.3606 94 84 2.00 340 0.14 . 0.3742 91 84 1.70 367 

a11 0.11 0.3317 94 85 1.70 340 0.13 0.3606 92 84 1.60 368 

a12 0.11 0.3317 94 86 1.70 340 0.11 0.3317 93 85 1.40 367 

A V G 0.13 0.3520 81.0 1.87 331 0.12 0.3515 84.2 1.53 361 

NOTE: DO NOT DELETE ROWS 6 OR 31 IF ADJUSTING FILE FOR ACTUAL NUMBER OF POINTS!!! 
ENSR 

SAMPLING TRAIN: J4A(*A 

PLANT: Qpu 

DATE: JJ, 

E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPL1 

TEST LOCA 

RUN NUMBER 

Stack Diameter - inches: 

R u n I 

0,84 

M L 

OPERATOR: /£ € 

START TIME: O^ T A « 

STOP TIME: ft.tl 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 2^. 7,f 

|STATIC PRESSURE (+«: Q,Q(a 

_ Probe/Pitot Number: 

_ Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: NB-/1 

_Meter Box Number: fSCS&f 

[orifice Coefficient (Y): / GOjLfi. 

"Delta H( 

Nozzle Size: Q.*y 

_XAD Thermocouple ID: -"^/ / 

INITIAL VAC. 

\ MID VAC. " 

FINAL VAC.' 

FIELD DAT A SHEE T 

LEAK CHECKS: 

?<<* 

in. 

[in. 

"in. 

CFM Q, OOl f 

CFM 

CFM gt QQ( 

FILTER DATA 

ORSAT lnitial:_ 

ORSAT Final: 

•MBpHj i 

DRiFre >r 

MFTEP OL 

QUIETER 

i ' 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, 'F 

VACUUM1 

n Hi) 

•MBpHj i 

DRiFre >r 

MFTEP OL 

QUIETER 

i ' „PROBE ; riL _-ie6x 

1 

, 50,0- c«s METER'^t" VACUUM1 

n Hi) 

•MBpHj i 

DRiFre >r 

MFTEP OL 

QUIETER 

i ' „PROBE ; riL _-ie6x 

1 

, 50,0-

7 

VACUUM1 

n Hi) 

o o./ V JICO 1 

, 50,0-

/£> a i r O.l fa(f> i 7V M« 

3 Si® rsJS pi m. 6 ft- pur 21 /«9 

<y 3* a , A ! 2 la ^<r r A(c7 SJ *&> 7 J 2 

s y o d.l I Ll .'85?. o J3(t>(n S? 9 d 

$ 

* • Ji 

o.&y l-f &z %3 7 7 

ft- .QtO 

6(5 o.ti 1% 

jOO, c? 7 O 

331 0,0 93 7-2 

2 13 .rz> 5T9 L. S~ 

3 r>.l3 2/C? -?7<0 

i o,i3 Z.o 3 HO t<n ^ 8 ^ 

s /oo o.n 1.7 ^Jo . T 

/JC> 

,,, \ 

an i. 7 y ? 

/c/X? aw yyo 

\ / 

s s s 

\/QO 

/ g o 

3 Tf 

/A'3 

6>o 

ORSAT DATA 

CO, 

• SILICA-SEL-. 

\37Y. VI ,7?°>-tFOR MOISTURE CALC: 
J 

SAMPLING TRAIN: MJb/{ 

PLANT: Qnua 

DATE: Ujif/oSr 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - inches: 

E P A ISOKINETIC SAMP u 1^ FIELD DAT A SHEE T 

LEAK CHECKS: 

Kurt 3-

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: /<f2£ 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE; 

[STATIC PRESSURE (+/•): ' 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pltot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

_Meter Box Number: 

[ Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

"Delta H@: 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

INITIAL VAC. 

\ MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

In. 

In. 

In. 

0.84 

H3~/t 

INIT. PITOT 

CFM Q,D°fi 

CFM 

CFM 0 , 0<\j 

FILTER DATA 

Ii JNI T 

A ± . 

SAMPLE IpLQCI 

S'iriME 

cf 

I VELOCITY - c i 

In 

t 

FINAL PITOT NUMBER TAPE 

T /ry v a>.:ft*S7 

o .VJ V ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: . 

TEMPERATURE READINGS,

 - F 

ZGd 9-S 

FINAL" 

••SiaCAiffELS 

Final Vol 

ORSAT DATA 

..Q<?2 : 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: ml. 

3S_ 

jLQ- 2o_ 

9-5 

<=>, \% 1C£> 

J2L Q,15 263."7 2.^8 

2 2 _ P.1 3 ^70 J ^ 2 . 

?5B 6V 

36/ to 8 C 

fob 

/eSg> 

? 

UT 

±3-

(•(=, 

loll3U- £ £ 1 

53 

5^ 

8 7 

"97" 

g-3 

try 

av 

17 
...rf** 

ENSR. 

//vterma r/o/vAe. 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: A- Recovered by: CSl/^ M 0 f^Z\S 

Run No. V2>~H\ Date: | | )|7 jim JVA U 3 ~ tf 3- H 11? 

X4Z> Mo-iu/e Ab. : XAD Module No. : —~ , 

Filter No.: *T \5H\° ,2, ^ Filter No.: " T 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)_ 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 1 

/ 

2 /CTD ^ ? 2 

3 / (TD 3 /(To 

4 7 4 O l3o 

5 /(TD 5 / CTD / o o 

\ y 

6 (OV //J D 6 /UV S V 

7 7 

DIFF : DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 373-? -

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Kit * 

Net H2 0 

Gain, mL H I Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 

^ja^^^jsSs^^:: 
Metho d 0023A Samplin g Parameter s 

Onyx, Rotary Kiln Incinerator #4 {wl Meter Box 80754 re-callibration) 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 21-Nov-02 21-Nov-02 22-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Stop Time 12:50 17:01 11:20 AVG S 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.315 0.315 0.315 0.315 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.70 29.53 

Net Sampling Time min. 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 

Volume Metered dcf 149.462 148.557 151.660 149.893 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 59.7 58.4 67.0 61.7 

Avg Delta H in H z O 2.08 2.10 2.18 2.12 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1526 0.1544 0.1605 0.1558 

D G M Calibration Factor — 1.0024 1.0024 1.0024 1.0024 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 150.596 150.067 152.010 150.891 

-.. Total Water Collected — - mL —1581.8 — —1642.1 1735.6 1653.2 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 74.582 77.425 81.834 77.947 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 33.1 34.0 35.0 34.1 

Moisture (@ saturation) %v/ v 101.7 101.7 100.8 101.4 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.6688 0.6597 0.6500 0.6595 

C 0 2 at Stack %dr y 3.90 3.80 4.50 4.07 

O z at Stack %dr y 13.50 13.60 13.40 13.50 

C O + N 2 %dr y 82.60 82.60 82.10 82.43 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.16 29.15 29.26 29.19 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 25.47 25.36 25.32 25.38 

Excess Air at Stack % 162.5 165.7 161.9 163.4 

Stack Diameter inches 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 

Static Pressure in H z O -0.38 -0.36 -0.40 -0.38 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.42 29.42 29.67 29.51 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 381.8 381.8 389.4 384.3 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.8047 0.8179 0.8228 0.8151 

S D E Average — 23.348 23.730 23.981 23.686 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 3,676 3,744 3,770 3,730 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 46,188 47,045 47,381 46,871 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 28,490 29,017 29,207 28,904 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 19,054 19,141 18,986 19,060 

Isokinetics % 102 101 103 102 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 80754 -

Delta H @ in. Hg 1.9050 1.9050 1.9050 

-

J:\Air_Tox\Prqject FilesVOnyxMDnyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Field\Unit 4\(M23 U4(recal)jds]DATA 
Method 0023A Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Rotary Kiln Incinerator #4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 21-Nov-02 21-Nov-02 22-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Stop Time 12:50 17:01 11:20 AVG S 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.315 0.315 0.315 0.315 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.70 29.53 

Net Sampling Time min. 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 

Volume Metered dcf 149.462 148.557 151.660 149.893 

Avg. DG M Temp. °F 59.7 58.4 67.0 61.7 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 2.08 2.10 2.18 2.12 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1526 0.1544 0.1605 0.1558 

D G M Calibration Factor — 1.0107 1.0107 1.0107 1.0107 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 151.843 151.309 153.268 152.140 

Total Water Collected mL 1581.8 1642.1 1735.6 1653.2 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 74.582 77.425 81.834 77.947 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 32.9 33.8 34.8 33.9 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.7 101.7 100.8 101.4 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.6706 0.6615 0.6519 0.6613 

C O z at Stack %dry 3.90 3.80 4.50 4.07 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.50 13.60 13.40 13.50 

C O + N 2 %dry 82.60 82.60 82.10 82.43 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.16 29.15 29.26 29.19 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 25.49 25.38 25.34 25.40 

Excess Air at Stack % 162.5 165.7 161.9 163.4 

Stack Diameter inches 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 

Static Pressure in H z O -0.38 -0.36 -0.40 -0.38 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.42 29.42 29.67 29.51 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 381.8 381.8 389.4 384.3 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.8047 0.8179 0.8228 0.8151 

S D E Average — 23.348 23.730 23.981 23.686 

Pitot Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Ga s Velocity afpm 3,674 3,742 3,769 3.728 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 46,169 47,025 47,361 46,852 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 28,479 29,005 29,194 28,893 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 19,098 19,187 19,033 19,106 

Isokinetics % 103 102 104 103 

Meter Box No. -- 80754 80754 80754 

Delta H @ in. Hg 1.9234 1.9234 1.9234 — 

Field QAYq c — 0.933 0.944 0.945 0.941 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 7.6% 6.6% 6.5% 6.9% 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worMNovember 2002\Field\UniI 4\(M23 U4.xls]DATA 
RCRA Trial Burn 

PT 

RUN 1AVGS-- PCDDs/1 PCDFs RUN 2 AVGS - PCDDs/PCDFs RUN 3 AVGS -- PCDDs/PCDFs PT DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SORT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.63 0.7937 49 48 2.00 396 0.65 0.8062 49 49 2.00 380 0.71 0.8426 49 47 2.20 387 

a2 0.71 0.8426 63 50 2.30 380 0.67. 0.8185 58 50 2.10 381 0.71 0.8426 65 50 2.20 387 

a3 0.65 0.8062 68 53 2.00 380 0.67 0.8185 61 50" 2.10 381 0.66 0.8124 69 54 2.10 388 

a4 0.58 0.7616 70 57 1.90 381 0.65 0.8062 61 52 2.00 381 0.66 0.8124 71 55 2.10 390 

35 0.65 0.8062 69 55 2.00 381 0.70 0.8367 63 52 2.20 381 0.66 0.8124 74 58 2.10 389 

36 0.71 0.8426 69 55 2.30 381 0.65 0.8062 65 53 2.00 383 0.66 0.8124 76 61 2.10 391 

a7 0.64 0.8000 60 54 2.00 381 0.74 0.8602 58 53 2.40 382 0.74 0.8602 76 64 2.40 389 

aB 0.68 0.8246 68 55 2.20 381 0.67 0.8185 64 54 2.10 382 0.70 0.8367 79 65 2.30 387 

a9 0.71 0.B426 71 56 2.30 380 0.66 0.8124 64 54 2.10 384 0.65 0.8062 79 66 2.10 393 

310 0.61 0.7810 68 57 2.00 381 0.63 0.7937 71 55 2.00 382 0.68 0.8246 81 70 2.20 391 

a11 0.62 0.7874 65 54 2.00 380 0.67 0.8185 73 58 2.10 382 0.70 0.8367 82 70 2.30 391 

a12 0.59 0.7681 65 54 1.90 379 0.67 0.8185 75 60 2.10 383 0.60 0.7746 79 68 2.10 390 

AVG 0.65 0.8047 59.7 2.08 382 0.67 0.8179 58.4 2.10 382 0.68 0.8228 67.0 2.18 389 

i 
/f/re/tivA r/o/vAi. 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: M ^""3 Recovered by: v^T/A v ffya/?<ttf 

Run No. Date: / / / P~/ RunNoi) Date :

 h I h 

XAD Module No.: XAD Module No.: 

Filter No.: ~~ " Filter No. : ' ~ 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 

0 W7 1 0 

2 /cn ? 2 

/(fD / 0 9-

3 /(TV go 3 /<n> 

4 0 % 4 o 

93 \ 

S3 

5 0 % > 

5 ir*-

6 6 

7 7 

DIFF : DIFF : 

Totals Totals 

f '5 

H i Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF: 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 

!^^^^ ' 
flVrEXNA r/ONAL 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: f^'Hb Recovered by: -3 7 A , (kottZlS 

Run No. Ul^r O Date: l l Run No. Date: 

XAD Module No. : XAD Module No.: 

Filter No. : ~~~~ Filter No.: 

Impinger 

No. 

*r«*f=^;f •'3*5 w 

. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

is* J.SM^'Vi^^si 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

• 

Initial 

Volume 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

__ 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 

0 s * 1 

2 (trO 2 

3 /OO 3 

4 0 4 ... 

5 0 ? ^ 5 

6 6 

7 7 

DIFF : DIFF : 

Totals Totals 

i l l Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

'* (g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight i l l (g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

'* (g) DIFF : 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Soi-dSilica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 

j0_Mi_ 

&

l

>5ft*i.«*v.*J;s": 
SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: Ql_f o 

E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPL

• 

I ,lrf_ FIELD} DAT A SHEE T 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION; 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter • inches: 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

i 

-18 

Il_ VZO£~ 

/_„ > If/?-

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE^ 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): _ 

Probe/Pitot Number: _ 

Pltot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: _ 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H'@: 

11-

1*5- H-s* C-

• 0.84 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

'FINAL VAC." 

LEAK CHECKSf 

— In. 

MJ. In. 

HO-"I 

INIT. PITOT 

' FINAL PITOT" 

C F M

 _______ 

CFM 

CFM' 

j FILTER DATA 

"NUMBER TAPE 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

_ORSAT lnltlal:_ 

ORSAT Final: 

S-VPLE CLOCK 

,1E." 

o 

LL. 

vELOCirc-J 

DataP^niwc'1 

.-. 'pRiFice.*" 

OfeilaHlfiv, 

2 . Q 

yctUM&T 

/cc 

.fSLUCA GEL;: 

Final Vol 

TEMPERATURE READINGS F 

STACK: 

__SL__ 

FILTER BOv 

___ i _ L 

VACUUM 

ORSAT DATA 

TO;, O j 

ljW<}~ FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: ml. 

WW M i ! COMMENTS 

_Tr T 

so 

___: _%_ 

3&. _45 _5Z. 

6-3 il 

__ 

<*_ 

5 3 II 

___ 

_T7 -

_ _ . 1-0 ___ T _____ "7 go 

"g7 ~ 

_____ 

fe__ 

5 3 ^ 

__ 

-NO 

7 / 

iio 

___ 

__-

_ _ 1 

->.{-^ 

______ 

_____ 

______ 

A 51 

_____ 

|7.._. 

12.0 

______ 

i__Z -

____ _ 

_____ 

______ 

____ 

_____ 

_____ 

_3. 

L___?__ 

_____ 2J±3L 

_____ 

i__ _ 

J__ . 

____ 

_d__ 

_____ 

^9 

v<_ 

_r 

~W 

_ _ _ 

___ 

6_> 

_ r 

_ _ _ 

£ _. 

i>_ 

5__ 

_ _ _ 

_____ 

_ _ 

_ _ 

__. 

iZL . 

i z . 

i___ 
E P A ISOKINETIC SAMP. 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: " 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION: _ 

RUN NUMBER: ~ 

Stack Diameter - inches: 

fc3 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: }_y Kl 5 .Ut, 

STOP TIME: /g^T? jttflO 77 ^ 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pltot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H @: 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

1 % ^ INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

'FINAL VAC.' 

G - FIELD DAT A SHEE T 

LEAK CHECKS: 

\?) in. CFM 6.00*5 

In. 

in. 

CFM 

C F M

 _______ 

0.84 

I-H--7 

-VP-TT 

FINAL PITOT y y NUMBEP '-TARE ? 

ORSAT Initial: _ 

ORSAT Final: V " 

^IMPJNGEK'VOLSJ!! ; Rinse 

;"?INIT_'!-,FINALi Volumes 

ICO 

o 

o 

.'•-SIL-ICA GEfaVOK_AT DATA 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: 
SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPL 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - inches: 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): ~ 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H@: 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

-O.Ho 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

- FIELD DATA SHEET 

LEAK CHECKS: 

ia in. 

'. '"• 

' In. 

CFM O.CdJ 

CFM 

CFMCSJQL^ 

0.84 

HB-ff 

INIT. PITOT 

' FINAL PITOT" • fNUMBER 

FILTER DATA 

X___ _ 

i-iORSAT lnltial:_ 

ORSAT Final: 

_ 

' -TAPE 

1

 'iweitsi<fi_fi?yfl.!sa.- Rinse 

«a 

Volumes 

/-._> 

/• _v;> 

t> 

o 

"j_.U0A.GEl#s :l 

ORSAT DATA 

CC. • OJ .. 

Final Vol 

SO/L^FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

JNE T GAIN: ml. 

s|i| 8 

___ 

HJBJBJ : 

PRIFCE ^ 

'fFTcRVO f 

Do H In . 

TEMPERATURE READINGS "F PUMP 

s|i| 8 

___ 

HJBJBJ : 

PRIFCE ^ 

'fFTcRVO f 

Do H In . 

- "^TACK ' FILTER EOX1-' IMPINGER1 

y GAS METER.V J « 

PUMP 

s|i| 8 

___ 

HJBJBJ : 

PRIFCE ^ 

'fFTcRVO f 

Do H In . 

- "^TACK ' FILTER EOX1-' IMPINGER1 

rtrr 

PUMP 

s|i| 8 

___ 

o,_ / - 77£i5 8 

' FILTER EOX1-' 

<V/ V - 7 t*t 

1 C / T o.y* 7-._ _ 2 V 9 zsz> 5 ^ */ 5 _ <<- 1 

3 '*0 _fS ? Zsto 5 7 Pi iH 

O-G<0 _ . / _f.fr. •%io -?k 0 _ 2 L > r »¥ 

z _ £/» Z.l Z v _ _3<=f j 3 " ^ SS "t 

3 _>._.•«_ Zt ?- 3=? / -5" > ?_ &~ 

O . 7- H ZH &5S.\ 33°! s?- ? „ i f . 

7 .__ Z . 3 -307- 5 _ W 6 _ r 16, 

5 -z. f STfiA 3 7 3 42? 7 9 £_ (A 

n? _.._> 8 - z . _ m?.o i E D f s Y ^ > 

7 2 . _ yrt ?_Z_ , 5 7 «_ 

7 — ' IL 

-> 2 . 1 ""Tig _ v / 23-9 _ s 

/£& 

I 

i 

ii___-L_ _ 
E mm* 

ORSAT ANALYSIS (EPA METHOD 3) 

I PLANT: QtiYt -J^ f \ PRE-LEAKCHECK: (? 

I I

 DATE: cAH.f 3- M STU M jj POST-LEA K CHECK : Qy* P 

LOCATION : ilho-i>/> 

SAMPL E TYP E : /vjjbh t*nJt i^yj^ &L NOTE: 

OPERATOR : J,/ ^ ho/OCiJ y ~ 1 

Valid Leak Check: Liquid level must not fall 

below bottom of capillary tubing in 4 minutes 

and meniscus must not change by more than 

2 mL in 4 minutes. 

DATA CRITERIA -

CO2 : When greater than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

When less than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

O2: When greater than or equal to 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

When less than 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

Run #3-! 

G AS 

COz 

Reading A 

Actual 

O2 

Run#t ; 

G A S 

CO2 

O2 

Net 

Reading B 

Actual ' Net 

Reading C 

Actual 

l/.0 | 

Reading A 

Actual Net 

if(0 

s 

Run #ju 

G A S 

CO2 

O2 

Reading A 

Actual 

f7.«r 

Net 

b -

Reading B 

Actual Net 

U 3 ^ 

f7. 3 r /3 < 

Reading B 

Actual Net 

3 * ! 3 ^ 

Net 

Read 

Actual 

3 . ? 

ing C 

Net 

3 ^ 

Reading C 

Actual 

3 * 

1M 

Net 

3 ^ 

1 3 . t 

Net O2 is actual O2 minus actual CO2 reading. 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

ffAvg. 

Net 

Volume 

3,? 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

3 ? 

C:\TEMPLATE\DATASKTS\0RSAT.WK4 
E_NRR 

ORSA T ANALYSI S (EP A METHO D 3) 

PLANT ; 

DATE : 

OPERATOR : ,J 7 / H Mo/titfs 

PRE-LEA K CHECK : 

POST-LEA K CHECK : 

LOCATIO N : U^j-'Y JTW r 

| SAMPL E TYP E -.fH^Lfl -f-r i nhvAfdbJ NOTE: Valid Leak Check: Liquid level must not fall 

below bottom of capillary tubing in 4 minutes 

and meniscus must not change by more than 

2 mL in 4 minutes. 

DAT A CRITERI A -

[ CO2 : When greater than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

I When less than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

I Qu When greater than or equal to 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

When less than 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

R u n #3 Reading A Reading B 

G A S Actual 

CO2 

02 * j|7,<4 

Net 

4 4 

Actual Net 

R un #2 

G A S 

CO2 

O2 

Reading A 

Actual Net 

Reading B 

Actual Net 

Run #3 

G A S 

CO2 

O2 * 

Reading A 

Actual Net 

Reading B 

Actual Net 

Reading C 

Actual 

MS 

\l.<\ 

Net 

4 4 

i m 

Reading C 

Actual Net 

Reading C 

Actual Net 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

M.- 5 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

Avg. 

Net 

Volume 

Net O2 is actual O2 minus actual CO2 reading. 

C:\TEMPLATBDATASHTS\0RSAT.WK4 
Method 29 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Rotary Kiln Incinerator #4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 21-Nov-02 21-Nov-02 22-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Stop Time 11:40 15:59 10:22 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.70 29.53 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 95.992 93.707 93.878 94.526 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 63.3 58.3 61.2 60.9 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 2.09 2.08 2.13 2.10 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1538 0.1526 0.1563 0.1542 

DGM Calibration Factor — 1.0077 1.0077 1.0077 1.0077 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 96.570 95.177 95.637 95.795 

Total Water Collected mL 1019.2 1075.2 1111.1 1068.5 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 48.055" 50.696 52.388 50.380 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 33.2 34.8 35.4 34.5 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.7 101.7 100.8 101.4 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M 

-

0.6677 0.6525 0.6461 0.6554 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 3.90 3.80 4.50 4.07 

O z at Stack %dry 13.50 13.60 13.40 13.50 

CO + N2 %dry 82.60 82.60 82.10 82.43 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.16 29.15 29.26 29.19 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 25.45 25.28 25.27 25.33 

Excess Air at Stack % 162.5 165.7 161.9 163.4 

Stack Diameter inches 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 

Static Pressure in H 2 0 -0.38 -0.36 -0.40 -0.38 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.42 29.42 29.67 29.51 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 385.8 384.3 390.8 387.0 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P -

0.8014 0.8112 0.8118 0.8082 

SDE Average — 23.308 23.573 23.680 23.520 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 3,670 3,725 3,726 3,707 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 46,120 46,807 46,827 46,585 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 28,311 28,785 28,817 28,638 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 18,904 18,781 18,618 18,768 

Isokinetics % 98 97 99 98 

Meter Box No. — 80582 80582 80582 -

Delta H @ in H 2 0 1.9233 1.9233 1.9233 -

Field QA Yqc — 0.9762 0.9915 0.9982 0.9886 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 3.13% 1.61% 0.94% 1.89% 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Rles\Onyx\Onyx 2002 mrttNovembO' 2002\Reld\Unit 4\[M29 U4 jclsJDATA 
Risk Burn Phase 2 - Test Condition B 

PT 

• RU N 1 AVG S --MET . MS R U N 2 AVG S - METAL S R U N 3 AVG S - METAL S 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

OGM 

OUT 

Delta H 

i 

STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.64 0.8000 53 52 2.10 385 0.64 0.8000 51 51 1.90 I 381 0.69 0.8307 52 48 2.10 387 

a2 0.68 0.8246 65 55 2.20 387 0.61 0.7810 56 51 1.80 383 0.67 0.8185 58 49 2.10 390 

a3 0.62 0.7874 68 57 2.00 386 0.67 0.81 &5 59 52 2.00 383 0.67 0.8185 62 51 2.10 391 

a4 0.64 0.8000 68 59 2.10 386 0.62 0.7874 59 53 2.00 383 0.68 0.8246 60 52 2.10 391 

a5 0.64 0.8000 72 61 2.10 386 0.66 0.8124 62 54 2.10 385 0.67 0.8185 66 55 2.10 391 

a6 0.62 0.7874 71 61 2.00 386 0.69 0.8307 63 55 2.30 385 0.65 0.8062 67 56 2.10 388 

a7 0.62 0.7874 65 60 2.00 386 0.68 0.8246 63 56 2.20 385 0.63 0.7937 69 58 2.10 389 

a8 0.68 0.8246 68 60 2.20 385 0.66 0.8124 64 55 2.10 385 0.66 0.8124 70 59 2.20 395 

a9 0.67 0.8185 70 61 2.20 385 0.66 0.8124 66 57 2.10 386 0.66 0.8124 71 61 2.20 395 

a10 0.60 0.7746 70 61 2.00 386 0.66 0.8124 66 57 2.10 385 0.66 0.8124 69 61 2.20 389 

a11 0.65 0.8062 69 61 2.10 385 0.69 0.8307 66 58 2.20 385 0.64 0.8000 73 63 2.10 389 

a12 0.65 0.8062 71 61 2.10 385 0.66 0.8124 67 58 2.10 386 0.63 0.7937 74 64 2.10 395 

AVG 0.64 0.8014 63.3 2.09 386 0.66 0.81112 58.3 2.08 384 0.66 0.8118 61.2 2.13 391 
J 

E P A ISOKINETI C SAMPu l FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

\ 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: j 

Stack Diameter - inches: 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): ~ 

' I'/Z/ IC7 Probe/Pitot Number: 

UUvT Pltot Coefficient: 

\ Filter Box No.: 

H8> Meter Box Number: 

J — Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

J ^H&A Delta H @: ~ 

ICfiHg rOi& ioSt. //__TNozzle Size: " 

\\fXf^ !&*€> flZZ. XAD Thermocouple ID: 

-ass 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC.' 

LEAK CHECKS: 

S In. 

— _ln . 

In. 

CFM £>.£' / 

;|-,;iMejN9gR.yoLisi: 

CFM -— 

(0 

0.B4 

j__?12_L 

INIT. PITOT 

[FINAL PITOT " 

[ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

CFMQ GQ% 

/cZ> 

FILTER DATA 

ci-r 

NUMBER 

3 * , -E 

%,®^., 

{ '"K v-ELOcrrv, 

HLTER vc " 

D. '0.' In.«= 

G^S METER TEMPERATURE READINGS F 3 * , -E 

%,®^., 

{ '"K v-ELOcrrv, 

HLTER vc " 

D. '0.' In.«= .....

PR0o c FILTER cox mm, IMIMMMM i 

3 * , -E 

%,®^., 

{ '"K v-ELOcrrv, 

HLTER vc " 

D. '0.' In.«= .....

PR0o c FILTER cox mm, . __ . 

^ / 

FILTER cox 

uo 

? ! O t< « ' •z.z. •ye ^; 

lo O.bZ. Z.C S i * / 

'?o t f^r?. / / /c5 

? Z.f -let? V? / O 

U3 

CO i \ 3S£> 7fZ W3 \ lO 

? Z.Z Ht5:3 zs& zsz> \ icb 

"5 0 67 Z.Z. <-its

.t Zs<f vs \ G>t ' O 

•frafiti 70s •Z.C, Q3I.7 <f1 l o O / 

t le& Zl 2M°t 5 © / Gt 

1(6,. o t r Z.( W (ef to 

\>o 

\ 

i 

> 

s 

1 

emmssm 

Iff 76 

Rinse 

Volumes 

ORSAT DATA 

OR MOISTURE CALC: 

ET GAIN: ml. 
SAMPLING TRAIN 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME 

STOP TIME: 

E P A ISOKINETI C SAMPL f - FIELD DATA SHEET 

LEAK CHECKS: 

\& In. CFM 8.6r>\ 

ORSAT DATA 

1

 COj" • • 

r 
SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAM. 

TEST LOCATION: OhSir *? 

RUN NUMBER: J2, 

Stack Diameter - Inches: h6 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/•): ~ 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pltot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

"Delta H @: 

Nozzle Size: 

XADiThermocouple ID: 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

' FINAL VAC. 

FIELD DATA SHEET 

LEAK CHECKS: 

l(o in. CFM COO*? 

CFM 

13 

in. 

' in. 

0.84 

• INIT. PITOT 

FINAL PITOT" 

CFM (p oo3 

FILTER DATA 

'NUMBER 

ORSAT Initial 

ORSAT Final 

fetARE>I 

^'IMPINGER VOLSr: Rinse ORSAT DATA 

, r INIT.. . ..IFINACJ Volumes COs 

o 

ICO 

ICO 

o 

ICO 

ICQ 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

llK'iiaiSSBilig ! r CMFICE. 

IKRmnlM B 1 

— 

WBmSSSal 

TEMPERATURE READ ^ G F UMP' ! 

CUUM 

n Ho 

r CMFICE. 

IKRmnlM B 1 

— 

WBmSSSal STACK PPHl l 

C A ME T E R 

UMP' ! 

CUUM 

n Ho 

£> 

r CMFICE. 

IKRmnlM B 1 

— 

WBmSSSal STACK PPHl l $|pfl$^l3w$|P II ' OUT 

UMP' ! 

CUUM 

n Ho 

~AT~\ £> Z.A ^ ."MO 

STACK 

t 

7 10 O.bl Zl $&>..r 3 7~ •; 5 B lo 

3 Te> O. foT- z,.\ •y^t ZW 3 8 (S >0 

3d O.M ? Zl bKS 3*> / C o /6 

? <*0 Z.i in- 3 ? / tO 

3 &> ZA z<rz / 6f- it 

Oo 0.6 3 •z.l mo 20o ss to 

2 CM* ZJZ. i,ct;.g -Z.5-8 "2 t o /Q 

3 0-GQ> Cs'5~0 Zft5~ ^ / 2<*"5 37-

I ?/ cf II 

Id 2rz Ut7,<S ?*? \ - If 

i 7.x £•?£>.& ZL/t . Z £ / \ (( 

3 no 

,\ U 

I 

i MMHMMi 
fAS TERM A r/ONAi. 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: fh/T) Recovered by: xfv ^ W 0 KJ Q S 

Run No. \JH " ^ 3 Date: ^ | >2— - Run No. Date : 

XAD Module No.: XAD Module No. : 

Filter No. : 

impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

: " 

Fin 

Volui 

(mL 

al 

ne 

-) 

m 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 0 

1 

2 j o o 

f l / 

2 

3 fm 3 

4 0 4 

5 5 

6 /(St> 6 

7 7 

DIFF: DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

T i l Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

T i l Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

. NetH 2 0 

Gain, mL 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL ^S8 S 
Method 26A Sampling Parameters 

Onyx, Rotary Kiln Incinerator #4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 21-Nov-02 21-Nov-02 22-Nov-02 

Start Time Units 09:45 13:52 08:15 

Stop Time 11:40 15:59 10:22 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.316 0.316 0.316 0.316 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29:45 29.45 29.70 29.53 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 90.254 88.551 91.219 90.008 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 72.9 66.3 67.3 68.8 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 1.95 1.93 2.04 1.98 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1434 0.1422 0.1501 0.1452 

DGM Calibration Factor — 1.0022 1.0022 1.0022 1.0022 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 88.647 88.065 91.329 89.347 

Total Water Collected mL 1010.5 1028.1 1094.0 1044.2 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 47.645 48.475 51.582 49.234 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 35.0 35.5 36.1 35.5 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.7 101.7 100.8 101.4 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M -

0.6504 0.6450 0.6391 0.6448 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 3.90 3.80 4.50 4.07 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.50 13.60 13.40 13.50 

CO + N 2 %dry 82.60 82.60 82.10 82.43 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.16 29.15 29.26 29.19 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 25.26 25.19 25.19 25.22 

Excess Air at Stack % 162.5 165.7 161.9 163.4 

Stack Diameter inches 48.0 48.0 48.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 

Static Pressure in HzO -0.38 -0.36 -0.40 -0.38 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.42 29.42 29.67 29.51 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 389.2 384.7 391.7 388.5 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.7529 0.7586 0.7749 0.7621 

SDE Average -

21.938 22.048 22.613 22.200 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 3,468 3,490 3,564 3,507 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 43,576 43,852 44,788 44,072 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 26,644 26,957 27,536 27,045 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 17,330 17,386 57,597 17,438 

Isokinetics % 98 97 100 99 

Meter Box No. 

— 80581 80581 80581 -

Delta H @ inH 2 0 2.0387 2.0387 2.0387 

-

Field QA Yqc — 0.9827 0.9914 0.9839 0.9860 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 1.94% 1.08% 1.83% 1.62% 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\November 2002VField\Unit 4\(M26 U4.xls]DATA 
f/VrE/WA T/O/VAC 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train, Recovered by: 

torn No. 0H-# ) Date: H 

XAD Module No. : \XAD Module No., 

Filter No. Filter No. i 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

23Q 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

0 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Sb 

/OZ? A y © 

7 o to. 

/(fD 

/Ojo 

rOt) ( 2 ° / o O /(SV /S~L 

0 /C/O 

/(n> 

/00 jdO j CTP ?1 /(r o 

DIFF: DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

•(g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net HzO 

Gain, mL 

Net H z O 

Gain, mL Ml 
v 

Onyx, Rotary Kiln Incinerator #4 

PT 

a1 

RUN 1 AVGS--PM/HC l/Clj RUN 2 AVGS — PM / HCI / CU RUN 3 AVGS - PM / HCI / CL PT 

a1 

Delta P 

0.63 

SQRT 

Delia P 

0.7937 

DGM 

IN 

54 

DGM 

OUT 

54 

Delta H 

2.20 

STACK 

TEMP 

390 

Delta P 

0.57 

SQRT 

Delta P 

0.7550 

DGM 

IN 

55 

DGM 

OUT 

55 

Delta H 

1.80 

STACK 

TEMP 

381 

Delta P 

0.59 

SQRT 

Delia P 

0.7681 

DGM 

IN 

50 

DGM 

OUT 

47 

Delta H 

1.90 

STACK 

TEMP 

387 

a2 

a3 

0.60 

0.51 

0.7746 

0.7141 

70 

77 

59 

62 

2.00 

1.70 

390 

390 

0.60 

0.61 

0.7746 

0.7810 

59 

65 

53 

55 

2.00 

2.00 

384 

383 

0.59 

0.57 

0.7681 

0.7550 

59 

67 

48 

52 

1.90 

1.80 

389 

390 

a4 0.59 0.7681 65 63 1.90 388 0.56 0.7483 66 56 1.80 383 0.62 0.7874 64 55 2.20 389 

aS 0.63 0.7937 72 66 2.10 388 0.59 0.7681 71 56 2.00 385 0.66 0.8124 68 59 2.30 391 

a6 0.58 0.7616 77 . 68 1.90 389 0.63 0.7937 74 60 2.20 385 0.59 0.7681 69 62 1.90 391 

a7 0.51 0.7141 78 69 1.70 389 0.56 0.7483 71 62 1.80 385 0.63 0.7937 72 64 2.20 391 

aa 0.53 0.7280 87 72 1.90 390 0.55 0.7416 77 63 1.80 386 0.61 0.7810 78 68 2.10 394 

a9 0.55 0.7416 89 73 2.00 389 0.58 0.7616 79 65 2.00 386 0.54 0.7348 80 70 1.90 395 

a10 0.53 0.7280 88 75 1.90 390 0.52 0.7211 77 67 1.80 386 0.57 0.7550 82 73 2.00 394 

a11 0.57 0.7550 89 75 2.10 388 0.57 0.7550 83 68 2.00 386 0.61 0.7810 87 75 2.10 394 

a12 0.58 0.7616 91 76 2.00 389 0.57 0.7550 84 69 2.00 386 0.63 0.7937 89 77 2.20 395 

A V G 0.57 0.7529 72.9 1.95 389 0.58 0.7586 66.3 1.93 385 0.60 0.7749 67.3 2.04 392 

NOTE: DO NOT DELET E ROW S 6 O R 31 IF ADJUSTING FILE FO R ACTUA L NUMBE R O F POINTS!!! 
EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLIJ 

ri-?-H» -

SAMPLING TRAIN: yW ||fc| | Cll--- BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

PLANT: TP hi V Y - JAU S<T STATIC PRESSURE (+/•): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pltot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H @: 

Ollf' tOiZ '6SZ. jygr'Nozzle Size: " 

i Qfff /jtff mpt UHO XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION 

RUN NUMBER: g 

Stack Diameter - inches: 

INITIAL VAC. • 

[ MID VAC. " 

FINAL VAC." 

FIELD DATA SHEET 

LEAK CHECKS: 

In. CFM O.ea'o 

In. CFM ' ' 

Cr, In. CFM^}, & z. 

0.84 

4 *" 

Ms-'I 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

INIT. PITOT 

FINAL PITOT" 

»-0 3S7 

_ ORSAT lnitlal:_ 

ORSAT Final:" 

FILTER DATA 

ABE 

\JQLLVE: i 

»*OHlFIGG{f>] 

C<1 of 1 Inn 

A^'P'ROBE" ;•'>!! 

£ 2 -

TEMPERATURE READINGS ' 

WINGER1

FIUTERBOX '" I ^ QAS METER . 

0 

,i|MRJN'9ER;VQLiS.;!.| Rinse 

ORSAT DATA 

..'.lNIT:-.-;:.-;:F.IN#lt;; j Volumes HHS H 

1 

/<n> 

/ o 

o 

/ Oc. 

/ 0 0 

1 

Final Vol. 

FOR MOISTURE CALC: 

NET GAIN: ml. 

--CQVIVENTS' 

10 

as 

Q.57-

a3_ 

z . o 

•z.1 

3?Q 

ZS3 

•V/ 

22_ 

e g 

? 3 
m m : 

3 

Sampling Train 

Run Number 

Client 

Facility Location 

Source 

Date 

Operator 

Stack Dia.-la 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

\77frlr\a/cL 

E P A ISOKINETI C SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

Barometric Pressure 

Static Pressure (+/-) —<S. 

Probe/Pitot Number fr< if-*•/-/? 

Pltot Coefficient d-gy 

Filter Box No. \-fQ - // 

Meter Boi No. 

LEAK CHECKS In 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC, 

CSln'TIg 

FINAL VAC 5~ 

+ 

jn. 

In. 

CFM 

CFM . 

CFM <doa/ 

•£^53/ INIT. PITOT —- FINAL PITOT 

Orlfice Coeradent (Y) /•<S°ZZ FILTER DATA 

Delta H@ NUMBER TARF 

Nozzle Size/No. 

XAS Thermocouple ID: — 

IMPINCEIl VOL'S. 

INIT. 

- T O 

/as 

FINAL 

SILICA GEL 

RINSE 

Orsat 

C02 02 

Final Purge Rate 

SAMPLE 

POINT TIMF 

VELOCITY 

IIF.AI) 

DeltaP, In uc 

ORIFILB 

WIPRVOI. 

neluriLiniK 

GASMETFH TEMPERATUR E READINGS, °F V PI MP 

\'t IHAf 

In. 1TB 

COMMrvTS 

SAMPLE 

POINT TIMF 

VELOCITY 

IIF.AI) 

DeltaP, In uc 

ORIFILB 

WIPRVOI. 

neluriLiniK 

VOLUME 

ft1 VI 41 K PRflRF OVEN 

oi«;/.:«c 

MODULE 

GAS METER 

PI MP 

\'t IHAf 

In. 1TB 

COMMrvTS 

SAMPLE 

POINT TIMF 

VELOCITY 

IIF.AI) 

DeltaP, In uc 

ORIFILB 

WIPRVOI. 

neluriLiniK 

VOLUME 

ft1 VI 41 K PRflRF OVEN 

oi«;/.:«c 

MODULE WTI'UW IN orrf 

PI MP 

\'t IHAf 

In. 1TB 

COMMrvTS 

Ci a /.e zsv -VT- 5Y 

z ID 3S</ « Z / Hi o9 

Zo OGI 3235 ss 5" 

O- 51* /.© m& 3&3 Z S t ~Z5Z Ho 

7 J « T \ Hi }( j r 

5Z> z.z _ C/f.</ 3g£T ZfO on ~?<* Lo 3' 

k? Gift* l-S s & r Z*Q \ </r ?/ 5T 

s>. ST A 8 <o70. 1 \ V4 ? 3 <*'S J-

%n 0.5 B •7 a 0>1/k6, «f8 *r 65" 5-

9* 0.-5Z. /. a 1 6 7 

ICO 7 . 0 1 83 <o8 JrHo ZTt J 8f 

rzo 666.325 " / 

1 1 

\ j V 

t 

1 

i 

| 

« 

! 

•' - _ 
lno»J%. . EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sampling Train ^Ypj fuel /cL 

Run Number 

Client 

Facility Location S&Grrrrr: TLSource f?AJiT ^ 

operator Stfsz s 

Stack Dia.-InBarometric Pressure 

Static Pressure (+/-) —O.HO 

Probe/Pitot Number 

Pitot Coemdent 

FUter Bo* No. 

Meter Box No. 

e>.Q 

Hi3 

LEAK CHECKS In^Hs 

INITIAL VAC O 

MID VAC 

FINAL VAC. "5" 

la 

In. 

"in. 

CFM i.«37 " Z>.< 

CFM -—* 

CFM O-^tVtINIT. PITOT • FINAL PITOT _ 

Orifice Coemdent (Y) JGZZZ FILTER DATA 

StartTune aS^Cfe*? - O^KTZ. 

Slop Time b^f f d^,7 /P? ? 

Delta H@ •Z..0267- *«NtlfflER TARF 

Nozzle Size/No. 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

IMPIM.ER VOL'i 

INIT, 

f<JO 

FINAL 

SILICA GEL Final Purge Rate 

Final PH 

RINSE 

Orsat 

mmm Ifioii 

', f.>: > 

hAMVl£ 

POINT 

CUKTC 

TiMr 

VELOCITY 

HEAD 

Hell il', in wi 

ORJUCK 

MKTKK VOL 

iteltall. .xi 

GAS METER | 

VOLUME f 

TEMPERATUR E READINGS , ° F PUMP 

VACUL'M 

. in-Hg . 

COMMENTS ! 

hAMVl£ 

POINT 

CUKTC 

TiMr 

VELOCITY 

HEAD 

Hell il', in wi 

ORJUCK 

MKTKK VOL 

iteltall. .xi 

GAS METER | 

VOLUME f 

PRDBr OVEN 

(IRUA-Mf 

MOW11.F. 

C;ASMI IIK 

PUMP 

VACUL'M 

. in-Hg . 

COMMENTS ! 

hAMVl£ 

POINT 

CUKTC 

TiMr 

VELOCITY 

HEAD 

Hell il', in wi 

ORJUCK 

MKTKK VOL 

iteltall. .xi n» | .:i*rK PRDBr OVEN 

(IRUA-Mf 

MOW11.F. iMi'iNr;i'u IN Dl'l 

PUMP 

VACUL'M 

. in-Hg . 

COMMENTS ! 

K 7 1.9 zsr 

•7 to 0. ~Pi '•9 Wo <fS •3-

zo o.s-h /•S 3 f o zs? / 5~Z s~ 

l.Z- sett 7SH l i t / S3- 3T 

r Q6 x , 3 V i l ta V 

try S~ 

$T>- 0 iS*? /.9 Vk 257 \ y e GZ tr 

smP/Pi 1.-Z- f i i ZS-7- S~ 

TV Z.A ZS& ZSZ- ) % s~ 

'•1 ZSZ. / V / i g o 'fo y 

%> O. Z.'o / 1 s~ 

r /CO -7.V -TM1M / 8 7 ? r T 

3 (/£> 0.6. 3 Z>Z 3 ^ / i 7 7 rfenin /7d / 

> 

1 

1 

f 

i 

1 

1 

1 

• - • 'MW l.'lVll"'11! liSi'in'I'Wi: ,!^NI'VUlSlMllililfoWlf'l.V /!' vHV ''i li1 ('^!Yff:"i''1 WviVi1?;;1':'!1!'''' 
PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: iHoJj ^ Recovered by: \T\^% lM_a KfA-T 

Run No. tf^V^f Date: |{ /- M Run No. > Date: I j | XI 

XAD Module No.: XAD Module No. : 

Filter No. : ~T~ Filter No.: T 

Impinger 

No. 

» 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

. — -

Rir 

Volt 

(nr 

ise 

ime 

L) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

mmmm 

1 1 

7 b r 

2 loo 2 

3 /** 

/ 

3 /OV I I/O / 

4 O 4 0 Y F 

5 1 0 0 /oo L 5 /OD X 

6 (00 / o o 6 /OO foo 

7 7 

DIFF: DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) . 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) . 

Final 

Weight 

(g) ~.FF . 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Cfli( 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 

Net H z O 

Gain, mL 
WrERA/A r/O/VAL. 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: WV-itft Recovered by: ^f\f^ pAj> fc&lS 

Run No. ff - /t 3 Date: 1! \>+ Run No. Date: 

XAD Module No.: XAD Module No.: 

Filter No.: T " Filter No. : 

Impinger 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

- . 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume-

(mL) 

Final 

-Volume 

(mL) 

n 

Rinse 

Volume — 

(mL) 

1 - 1 

2 

j CTD 

2 

3 /iT D \ n 

V 

3 

4 0 3 4 

5 /(SO 

I I 5 

6 / (TD \ l p 6 

7 7 

DIFF : DIFF : 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger m \ 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL ^^^ ^ 
IHSR . Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

Corrects 

FH+B H 

Element 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value (a) 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Mg 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

UR 

Default 

Value 

ug 

5% of ; 

Sample 

ug 

Corrected 

Back Half 

ug 

Corrects 

FH+B H 

Antimony (Sb) 1.04 0.59 • 11.61 0.05 0.45 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.4S 

Arsenic (As) 27.00 (0.40) 11.61 1.35 27.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 27.00 

Barium (Ba) 43.50 67.00 11.61 * 2.18 31.89 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

• 0.00 31.89 

Beryllium (Be) (0.10) (0.10) 11.61 — (0.10) 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

; 0.00 (0.10) 

Cadmium (Cd) 1.75 (0.10) 11.61 0.09 1.75 0.00 0.00 . 1.00 

-

0.00 1.75 

Chromium (Cr) 70.50 25.00 11.61 » 3.53 58.89 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 58.89 

Lead (Pb) 12.50 0.55 * 11.61 0.63 11.95 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 11.95 

Nickel (Ni) 47.00 62.00 11.61 * 2.35 35.39 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

i 0.00 35.39 

Selenium (Se) 3.60 (1.00) 11.61 0.18 3.60 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 3.60 

Silver (Ag) 18.00 200.00 11.61 * 0.90 6.39 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 6.39 

Thallium (Tl) (0.50) (0.50) 11.61 — (0.50) 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 (0.50) 

If FHB is between 0 to 11.61 ng use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 11.61 ng then use the greater of 11.61 ng or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

' - value used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.25 - in. filter size 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 ng then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 ng use the greater of either 1 ng ° r 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

MERCURYi 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Kg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg 

FRONT HALF 0.21 0.05 » j 6.00 0.01 0.16 

BACK HALF 214.45 0.05 * : 6.00 10.72 214.40 

mmm ii mwrnmrn m ii iiiiiiiiiiiiii i 'mm TOTAL Hg 214.56 

CLIENT: 

PROGRAM 

RUN NO. 

Onyx, Sauget, IL 

Nov 2002 

Unit 2 Run 1 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ng then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use the greater of either 6 ng or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction J:\AlO\u\Prujei4 Ftia*0ny*\Ony)i 3001 winlrtNovembci 2003\Fiold\Uiiil a^METCORfi-Niirtia.i; 
mm. Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

TOTA L 

Element 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value (a) 

Hg 

5% of ! 

Sample 

ug I 

Corrected 

Front Half 

ug 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

Hg 1 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Back Half 

Hg 

COrteCtetJ 

FB+B H 

US 

Antimony (Sb) 0.74 0.6 * 11.61 0.04 j ;

 0.15 0.00 o.oo ! I 1.00 0.00 0.1S 

Arsenic (As) 11.00 (0.40) 11.61 0.55 ; 11.00 0.00 0.00 i j i 1.00 -

0.00 11.00 

Barium (Ba) 55.00 67.00 11.61 * 2.75 43.39 0.00 

0.00 1 I 1.00 _ 0.00 43.39 

Beryllium (Be) (0.10) (0.10) 11.61 

-

(0.10) 0.00 0.00 • j 1.00 -

0.00 (0.10) 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.90 (0.10) 11.61 0.05 j 0.90 0.00 0.00 • 1.00 

-

0.00 0.90 

Chromium (Cr) 29.00 25.00 11.61 * 1.45 i 17.39 0.00 0.00 1 1.00 -0.00 17.39 

Lead (Pb) 14.00 0.55 * 11.61 0.70 13.45 0.00 0.00 i l.oo 

-

0.00 13.45 

Nickel (Ni) 49.00 62.00 11.61 * 2.45 37.39 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 

-

0.00 37.39 

Selenium (Se) 2.10 (1.00) 11.61 0.11 2.10 0.00 0.00 ! 1.00 — 0.00 2.10 

Silver (Ag) 19.00 200.00 11.61 * 0.95 7.39 0.00 0.00 ; l.oo 

-

0.00 7.39 

Thallium (TI) (0.50) (0.50) 11.61 

-

(0.50) 0.00 0.00 ; l.oo 

-

0.00 (0.50) 

If FHB is between 0 to 11.61 ng use blank value to correct 

IfFHB> 11.61 ng then use the greater of 11.61 ngorthe lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 ng then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 ug use the greater of either 1 ng or 5% of BH 

* - value used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.25 • in. filter size ( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

MERCURY: 

Default 5% of Corrected 

Mercury Sample Fid Blk Value Sample Amount Hg 

Fraction Hg Hg* Hg Hg i Hg CLIENT: Onyx, Sauget, IL 

FRONT HALF 0.10 0.05 * 6.00 0.01 0.05 PROGRAM : Nov 2002 

BACK HALF 300.63 0.05 » 6.00 15.03 300.58 RUN NO. Unit 2 Run 2 

II TOTAL Hg 300.63 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ng then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use the greater of either 6 ng or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 

JMir_T(w\Pnij«! FllertOnyjiVJnJX 2002 wwkWnvcmber 2002\FtaW\Unil HlMErCOftR-NotfH.i: 
ENS R Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONTHALF BACK HALF 

TOTAL 

Element 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value (a) 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Hg 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk | 

Hg 

j Default 

; Value 

Hg 

5% of j 

Sample 

Hg : 

Corrected 

Back Half 

: Hg 

COIT«««ct 

FH + BH 

H8 

Antimony (Sb) 0.77 0.59 * 11.61 0.04 0.18 0.00 0.00 [ ; 1.00 _. 0.00 0.18 

Arsenic (As) 2.00 (0.40) 11.61 0.10 2.00 0.00 0.00 j 1.00 

-

0.00 2.00 

Barium (Ba) 60.00 67.00 11.61 * 3.00 48.39 0.00 0.00 ; 1.00 

-

; 0.00 48.39 

Beryllium (Be) (0.10) (0.10) 11.61 — (0.10) 0.00 0.00 • : 1.00 

-

; 0.00 (0.10) 

Cadmium (Cd) 3.00 (0.10) 11.61 0.15 3.00 0.00 0.00 i ; 1.00 

-

i 0.00 3.00 

Chromium (Cr) 26.00 25.00 11.61 * 1.30 14.39 0.00 o.oo ; ; 1.00 -

j 0.00 14.39 

Lead (Pb) 5.20 0.55 » 11.61 0.26 4.65 0.00 0.00 : 1.00 -

0.00 4.6S 

Nickel (Ni) 54.00 62.00 11.61 » 2.70 42.39 0.00 0.00 ; 1.00 _ : o.oo 42.39 

Selenium (Se) 1.10 (1.00) 11.61 0.06 1.10 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 -

i o.oo 1.10 

Silver (Ag) 160.00 200.00 11.61 * 8.00 148.39 0.00 0.00 ; 1.00 

-

j • 0.00 148.39 

Thallium (Tl) (0.50) (0.50) 11.61 

-

(0.50) 0.00 0.00 ; 1.00 

-

: 0.00 (0.50) 

If FHB is between 0 to 11.61 ng use blank value to corr 

If FHB > 11.61 ng then use the greater of 11.61 ugort 

5Ct 

ie lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 (ig then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 ug use the greater of either 1 ng or 5% of BH 

* - value used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.25 - in. filter size ( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

MERCURY: 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg CLIENT: Onyx, Sauget, IL 

FRONT HALF 0.07 0.05 * 6.00 0.00 0.02 PROGRA M : Nov 2002 

BACK HALF 130.39 0.05 * 6.00 6.52 130.34 R U N NO . Unit 3 Run 1 

I TOTAL Hg 130.36 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ng then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use the greater of either 6 ng or 5% of Frt 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction J.-WrJTtuVProjrel FikrtOnyxVDnyn 2002 wmkVNownibof 2O02\Fwtd\Unit 3\IMETCORR-Nort2.L 
Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

TOTA L 

Default 5% of Corrected Default 5% of Corrected Corrected 

Sample Fid Blk Value (a) Sample Front Half Sample Fid Blk Value Sample Back Half PH +BH 

Element ug Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg Hg iiiiiiiiiiiiiiigiiiiiiiiii 

Antimony (Sb) 7.50 0.6 * 11.61 0.38 j 6.91 0.00 0.00 1 : 1.00 __ 0.00 6.91 

Arsenic (As) 3.10 (0.40) 11.61 0.16 3.10 0.00 0.00 ; l.oo 

-

0.00 3.10 

Barium (Ba) 57.00 67.00 11.61 « 2.85 ! 45.39 0.00 0.00 ! 1.00 

-

0.00 45.39 

Beryllium (Be) (0.10) (0.10) 11.61 — | (0.10) 0.00 0.00 i 1 1.00 

-

0.00 (0.10) 

Cadmium (Cd) 1.60 (0.10) 11.61 0.08 i 1.60 0.00 0.00 = ! 1.00 

-

0.00 1.60 

Chromium (Cr) 25.00 25.00 11.61 * 1.25 1 13.39 0.00 0.00 : i 1.00 -- 0.00 13.39 

Lead (Pb) 4.30 0.55 * 11.61 0.22 3.75 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 

-

0.00 3.75 

Nickel (Ni) 54.00 62.00 11.61 * 2.70 42.39 0.00 0.00 ; i 1.00 

-

0.00 42.39 

Selenium (Se) 1.00 (1.00) 11.61 0.05 1.00 0.00 0.00 i i 1.00 

-

0.00 1.00 

Silver (Ag) 61.00 200.00 11.61 * 3.05 ! 49.39 0.00 0.00 ! ! 1.00 

-

0.00 49.39 

Thallium (Tl) (0.50) (0.50) 11.61 

-

(0.50) 0.00 0.00 i ! 1.00 

-

0.00 (0.50) 

If FHB is between 0 to 11.61 ng use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 11.61 ug then use the greater of 11.61 ng or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction 

MERCURY: 

(a) - based on a 3.25 - in. filter size 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 ng then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 ng use the greater pf either 1 ng or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

i Hg 

FRONT HALF 0.07 0.05 * 6.00 0.00 0.02 

BACK HALF 142.49 0.05 * 6.00 7.12 142.44 

iiiiiiiiiiiii TOTAL Hg 142.45 

CLIENT : 

PROGRAM : 

RUN NO. 

Onyx, Sauget, IL 

Nov 2002 

Unit 3 Run 2 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ng then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ug use the greater of either 6 ng or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 

JMir..Ttw\Projcct Fita\Onyi«)iiy* 2002 wmttNovcmbn 2O02*kld\Un!l SAtMETCORR.N.Mfln.i: 
mat, Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

Element 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value (a) 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Hg 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

! Back Half 

i Hg 

Corrected 

FH + BH 

fig 

Antimony (Sb) 0.67 0.59 * 11.61 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.08 

Arsenic (As) 2.50 (0.40) 11.61 0.13 2.50 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 2.S0 

Barium (Ba) 50.00 67.00 11.61 * 2.50 38.39 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 38.39 

Beryllium (Be) (0.10) (0.10) 11.61 — (0.10) 0.00 0.00 1.00 -

0.00 (0.10) 

Cadmium (Cd) 1.10 (0.10) 11.61 0.06 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 1.10 

Chromium (Cr) 23.00 25.00 11.61 * 1.15 11.39 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 11.39 

Lead (Pb) 13.00 0.55 * 11.61 0.65 12.45 0.00 0.00 1.00 ... i 0.00 12.45 

Nickel (Ni) 41.00 62.00 11.61 * 2.05 29.39 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 29.39 

Selenium (Se) (1.00) (1.00) 11.61 — (1.00) 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 (1.00) 

Silver (Ag) 74.00 200.00 11.61 * 3.70 62.39 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

i o.oo 62.39 

Thallium (Tl) (0.50) (0.50) 11.61 

-

(0.50) 0.00 0.00 1.00 

-

0.00 (0.50) 

If FHB is between 0 to 11.61 ng use blank value to correct If BHB is>0 but<=l ng then use the BHB value to correct 

If FHB > 11.61 ng then use the greater of 11.61 ng or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . If BHB is >1 ng use the greater of either 1 ng or 5% of BH 

* - value used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.25 - in. filter size ( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

MERCURY; 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg CLIENT : Onyx, Sauget, IL 

FRONT HALF 1.40 0.05 * 6.00 0.07 1.35 PROGRAM : Nov 2002 

BACK HALF 38.98 0.05 » 6.00 1.95 38.93 R U N NO . Unit 4 Run 1 

mmm TOTAL Hg 40.28 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ng then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use the greater of either 6 ng or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction JMir_TPii\Projwt PiWOnyxtffciy* 2002 wittNowmber 2O02\FieU\Unit 3^ETCORR-NoV02,l. 
I 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

TOTA L 

Default 5% of ; Corrected . Default 5% of Corrected Corrected 

Sample Fid Blk Value (a) Sample Front Half Sample Fid Blk Value Sample Back Half FB+BH 

Element ug MS ug ug j ug ' ug ug ; \ ug Hg ug . .. M*. 

Antimony (Sb) 0.53 0.6 11.61 0.03 i (0.53) 0.00 0.00 \ i l.oo 0.00 (0.53) 

Arsenic (As) 1.90 (0.40) 11.61 0.10 1.90 0.00 0.00 ; l.oo ~ 0.00 1.90 

Barium (Ba) 51.00 67.00 11.61 * 2.55 ; 39.39 0.00 0.00 •: 1.00 0.00 39.39 

Beryllium (Be) (0.10) (0.10) 11.61 

-

j (0.10) 0.00 0.00 j 1.00 

-

0.00 (0.10) 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.58 (0.10) 11.61 0.03 0.58 0.00 0.00 ! 1.00 — 0.00 0.58 

Chromium (Cr) 23.00 25.00 11.61 * 1.15 ! 11.39 0.00 0.00 I 1.00 

-

0.00 11.39 

Lead (Pb) 15.00 0.55 * 11.61 0.75 14.45 0.00 0.00 i l.oo 

-

0.00 14.45 

Nickel (Ni) 43.00 62.00 11.61 * 2.15 31.39 0.00 0.00 i l.oo 0.00 31.39 

Selenium (Se) (1.00) (1.00) 11.61 

-

(1.00) 0.00 0.00 ; 1.00 

-

0.00 (1.00) 

Silver (Ag) 29.00 200.00 11.61 * 1.45 17.39 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 

-

0.00 17.39 

Thallium (Tl) (0.50) (0.50) 11.61 — i (0.50) 0.00 0.00 . • 1.00 

-

0.00 (0.50) 

If FHB is between 0 to 11.61 ng use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 11.61 ng then use the greater of 11.61 ng or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

If BHB is >6 but <=1 ng then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >} ng use the greater of either 1 ng or 5% of BH 

* - value used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.25 - in. filter size ( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

MERCURY: 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk jjj 

ug Iii 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of j 

Sample 

Hg ! 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg 

FRONT HALF 1.10 0.05 * |i| 6.00 0.06 1.05 

BACK HALF 472.23 0.05 * ||| 6.00 23.61 472.18 

mmmrnmmmmmmmmmmmmimm TOTAL Hg 473.23 

CLIENT : 

PROG : 

T i 

RUN'NO . 

Onyx, Sauget, I L 

Nov 2002 

Unit 4 Run 2 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ng then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use the greater of either 6 ng or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 

J:\AiT_Tu\Pmjea Fikrtftiyilttnyx 1002 workWovsmbcr 2002\FieW\Unil WMETCORK-NmTO.l. 
! 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HALF BACK HALF 

TOTAL 

Corrected. 

FH + BH 

U Elemen S t J ! 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk jjj 

Hg li; 

Default 

Value (a) 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

HS 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Ug 

Sample 

HS 

Fid Blk 

HS 

; Default 

I Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg i 

Corrected 

Back Half 

Hg 

TOTAL 

Corrected. 

FH + BH 

U S 

Antimony Kb) 0.52 0.6 U 11.61 0.03 (0.52) 0.00 3 0.00 i 1.00 0.00 (0.52) 

Arsenic (tk) 1.90 (0.40) tjj 11.61 0.10 1.90 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 -

0.00 1.90 

Barium (A) 52.00 67.00 Iii 11.61 • 2.60 40.39 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 -

0.00 40.39 

Beryllium fee) (0.10) (0.10) i; 11.61 

-

(0.10) 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 -

0.00 (0.10) 

Cadmium (Ed) 0.45 (0.10) 11.61 0.02 0.45 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 -

0.00 0.45 

ChromiumlCr) 27.00 25.00 11.61 » 1.35 15.39 0.00 0.00 i l.oo -

0.00 15.39 

Lead (P* 9.80 0.55 * !:!; 11.61 0.49 9.25 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 -

0.00 9.25 

Nickel (I§) 42.00 62.00 tii 11.61 * 2.10 30.39 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 i 0.00 30.39 

Selenium fie) (1.00) (1.00) ii 11.61 — (1.00) 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 — 0.00 (1.00) 

Silver (Al) 12.00 200.00 tii 11.61 * 0.60 0.39 0.00 0.00 i 1.00 -

0.00 0.39 

Thallium Sti) (0.50) (0.50) ii 11.61 

-

(0.50) 0.00 0.00 | 1.00 

-

0.00 (0.50) 

JK 

If FHB is betwejn 0 to 11.61 ng use blank value to correct 

tf FHB > 11.61 | g then use the greater of 11.61 ng or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 ng *en use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 ng use the greater of either 1 ng or 5% of BH 

• value used fofblank correction (a) - based on a 3.25 - in. filter size ( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

IfFBis>0 but<| 

MERCURY: 

Mercury 1 

Fraction | 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg CLIENT : Onyx, Sauget, IL 

FRONT HAL] 42.00 0.05 * 6.00 2.10 41.95 PROGRAM: Nov 2002 

BACK HALrj 822.10 0.05 * 6.00 41.11 822.05 RUN NO. Unit 4 Run 3 

TOTAL Hg 864.00 

6 ng then use the FB value to correct ( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit JftAir_To<yST>j^Fil^i^^y»3miwfk\NDTOifcr31ffl3^»WUnil<\)METCOBR.Nin'n2.U4 Rl,3^.ililRon3 

I < 
Onyx Environmental Services - November 2002 

Particulate Filter and Acetone Rinse Results 

ACETONE FRONT HALF RINSE RESULTS 

Sample 

ID# 

Lab Acetone Blank 

Sample 

Volume 

(mL) 

50 

Tare 

Weight 

(9) 

104.0419 

Gross 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

104.0416 

Net 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

-0.0003 

Blank-Corrected 

Sample Net Sample Weight 

ID# 

Lab Acetone Blank 

Sample 

Volume 

(mL) 

50 

Tare 

Weight 

(9) 

104.0419 

Gross 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

104.0416 

Net 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

-0.0003 

(g) (mg) 

M50-FHR-RB 

U2-M26A-FHR-R1 

180 

59 

102.1898 

102.3549 

102.1883 

102.3575 

-0.0015 

0.0026 0.0026 2.6 

U2-M26A-FHR-R2 53 105.3358 105.3466 0.0108 0.0108 10.8 

U3-M26A-FHR-R1 62 103.7213 103.7243 0.0030 0.0030 3.0 

U3-M26A-FHR-R2 73 116.4343 116.4381 0.0038 0.0038 3.8 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0 

g/mL 

mg/g g/mL 

P M cone, in acetone (LB # 1) = 0.000 0.00E+00 

P M cone, in acetone (FB# 1) = 0.000 0.00E+00 

Max. Acetone Blank Correction = 0.010 7.91 E-06 

PARTICULATE FILTER RESULTS 

Run 

# 

Tare 

Weight 

(g) 

Gross 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

Net Sample Weight 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

Run 

# 

Tare 

Weight 

(g) 

Gross 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) (g) (mg) NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

Lab Filter Blank 0.3901 0.3902 0.0001 0.1 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

M26A-PF-FB 0.3929 0.3931 0.0002 0.2 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

U2-M26A-FHR-R1 0.3802 0.3817 0.0015 1.5 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

U2-M26A-FHR-R2 0.4024 0.4044 0.0020 2.0 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

U3-M26A-FHR-R1 0.3878 0.3879 0.0001 0.1 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

U3-M26A-FHR-R2 0.3807 0.3812 0.0005 0.5 whichever is greater. 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

0.0000 0.0 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

0.0000 0.0 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within ± 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

j:\air_tox\project files\onyx\onyx 2002 work\november 2002\field\[m5corr6 - u2&3.xls]a 
Onyx Environmental Services - November 200 2 

Particulate Filter and Acetone Rinse Results 

Sample 

ID# 

t a h A f»rtn o Dlant f 

Sample 

Volume 

(mL) 

*i0 

Tare 

Weight 

(g) 

104 0419 

Gross 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

104 0416 

Net 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

-0 0003 

Blank-Corrected 

Sample Net Sample Weight 

ID# 

t a h A f»rtn o Dlant f 

Sample 

Volume 

(mL) 

*i0 

Tare 

Weight 

(g) 

104 0419 

Gross 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

104 0416 

Net 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

-0 0003 

(g) (mg) 

L d U nOClUU c DldllK . 

M50-FHR-RB 180 102.1898 

1 \J—f*\J*T 1 \J 

102.1883 -0.0015 

U4-M26A-FHR-R1 84 103.4120 103.4161 0.0041 0.0041 4.1 

U4-M26A-FHR-R2 78 103.2815 103.2854 0.0039 0.0039 3.9 

U4-M26A-FHR-R3 73 103.1772 103.1837 0.0065 0.0065 6.5 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0 

0.0000 0.0000**"*" 0.0"""~'~ —

" 

utMis>iiy ui Muetunt: - u./auo g/mL 

mg/g g/mL 

P M cone, in acetone (LB # 1) = 0.000 O.OOE+00 

P M cone, in acetone (FB # 1) = 0.000 0.O0E+O0 

Max. Acetone Blank Correction = 0.010 7.91 E-06 

PARTICULATE FILTER RESULTS 

Run 

# 

Tare 

Weight 

(g) 

Gross 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) 

Net Sample Weight 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

Run 

# 

Tare 

Weight 

(g) 

Gross 

Sample 

Weight 

(g) (9). (mg) NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

Lab Filter Blank 0.3901 0.3902 0.0001 0.1 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

M26A-PF-FB 0.3929 0.3931 0.0002 0.2 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

U4-M26A-FHR-R1 0.4065 0.4076 0.0011 1.1 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

U4-M26A-FHR-R2 0.4029 0.4038 0.0009 0.9 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

U4-M26A-FHR-R3 0.3839 0.3849 0.0010 1.0 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

0.0000 0.0 whichever is greater. 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

0.0000 0.0 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

0.0000 0.0 

NOTE : 

No blank filter correction 

is necessary if blank 

filter is within + 5 mg 

of initial tare weight 

or 2 % of sample weight, 

whichever is greater. 

j:\air_tox\project files\onyx\onyx 2002 work\november 2002\field\[m5corr6 - u4.xls]a 
') 

) 

i 
INTERNA TtONAL 

APPENDI X B 

PROCES S FEE D AN D OPERATIN G CONDITIONS 
UNIT 2/3 TEST CONDITIONS 

Week of November 18, 2002 

Chlorine - Ibs/hr 200 - 250 

Drum Solids - Ibs/hr 

High Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Low Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Lead in drum solids - Ibs/hr 

Chromium in low Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Mercury in drum solids - Ibs/hr 

SDA Outlet Temperature -

0

 F 

Unit 2 Run 1 

Unit 2 Run 2 

Unit 3 Run 1 

Unit 3 Run 2 

Lower Chamber Temperature -

0

 F 

Upper Chamber Temperature -

0

 F 

750 (25lbs/charqe) 

700 

1000 

30 

15 

no mercury 

390 

425 

390 

425 

1750 

1900 

Two Conditions, One Runs per Condition per Incinerator 
UNIT 4 TEST CONDITIONS 

Week of November 18, 2002 

Chlorine - Ibs/hr 

Drum Solids - Ibs/hr 

Bulk Solids - Ibs/hr 

High Btu Liquids in SCC - Ibs/hr 

High BTU Liquids in Kiln - Ibs/hr 

Low Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Lead in drum solids - Ibs/hr 

Chromium in low Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Mercury in Drum Solids - Ibs/hr 

Powdered Activated Carbon 

Run 1 - Ibs/hr 

Run 2 - Ibs/hr 

Run 3 - Ibs/hr 

SDA Inlet Temperature -

0

 F 

SDA Outlet Temperature -° F 

Kiln Temperature -

0

 F 

S CC Temperature -° F 

250 (all in liquids) 

1500 (25 lbs/charge) 

5000 

800 

400 

750 

30 

15 

0.1 (Runs 2 and 3 only) 

6 ( no mercury spiking) 

15 

10 

750 

425 

1850 

1950 
APPENDIX C 

FIELD EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION FORMS 
APPENDIX D 

ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS 
ALT A 

December 11,2002 

Alta Project I.D.: 23141 

Mr. Craig Doolittle 

ENSR Consulting and Engineering 

2 Technology Park Drive 

Westford, MA 01886 

Dear Mr. Doolittle, 

Enclosed are the results for the eight XAD samples received at Alta Analytical Laboratory on 

November 25, 2002. These samples were extracted and analyzed using EPA Method 23 for 

tetra-through-octa chlorinated dioxins and furans. A standard turnaround time was provided for this 

work. 

The following report consists of a Sample Inventory (Section I), Analytical Results (Section II) and 

the Appendix, which contains the chain-of-custody, a list of data qualifiers and abbreviations, Alta's 

current certifications, and copies of the raw data (if requested). 

Alta Analytical Laboratory is cornmitted to serving you effectively. If you require additional 

information, please contact me at 916-933-1640 or by email at mmaier@altalab.com. Thank you for 

choosing Alta as part of your analytical support team. 

Sincerely, 

Martha M. Maier 

Director of HRMS Services 

Alta Analytical laboraion- certifies that the report herein meets all the requirements setforth hy NELAC for those 

applicable test methods.This report should not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of ALTA. 

Project 23141 

Alta Analytical Laboratory Inc. 

1104 Windfield Way 

El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 

FAX (916) 673-0106 

Page 1 of 620