alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 14 June 2005 by Commission of the European Communities against Ireland

(Case C-248/05)

(2005/C 205/17)

Language of the case: English

An action against Ireland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 14 June 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Ms Sara Pardo Quintillán and Ms Donatella Recchia, acting as Agents, assisted by F. Louis of the Brussels bar and C. O'Daly, Solicitor of the Law Society of Ireland, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

On the basis of complaints submitted to it, the Commission has become aware of widespread breaches of Council Directive 80/68/EEC in Ireland.

First, since 1989 Ireland has permitted a municipal landfill to operate at Ballymurtagh, Co. Wicklow without formal authorization being granted as required under Article 4(2) of Directive 80/68. As a consequence of not complying with Article 4(2), Article 9 of the same directive was also breached. In addition, the waste licence covering the landfill site, granted by Ireland's Environmental Protection Agency only in 2001, infringes Articles 4, 5, 7 and 10 of Directive 80/68/EEC.

Second, the Commission has uncovered evidence demonstrating that Ireland has failed to comply with Directive 80/68/EEC in relation to indirect discharges into groundwater from septic tanks. In this regard, the Commission has investigated circumstances relating to a hotel premises at Creacon Lodge, Co. Wexford, Ireland's longstanding interpretation of Article 5(1) of Directive 80/68/EEC and wider breaches of the same Directive throughout the Irish countryside. Reports on eutrophication of the Lakes of Killarney, Co. Kerry, Irish official water pollution reports, and breaches of Directive 80/778/EEC (2) on the quality of water intended for human consumption demonstrate Ireland's failure to comply with relevant provisions of Directive 80/68/EEC.

The Commission therefore considers that Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13 of Council Directive 80/68/EEC on the protection of groundwater against pollution caused by certain dangerous substances.

----

(1)  Council Directive 80/68/EEC of 17 December 1979 on the protection of groundwater against pollution caused by certain dangerous substances, OJ L 20, 26.01.1980, p. 43.

(2)  Council Directive 80/778/EEC of 15 July 1980 relating to the quality of water intended for human consumption, OJ L 229, 30.08.1980, p. 11.

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134876 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134876 COA: 276211 Wayne CC: 02-013849-01 TERRY DEJUAN HOLLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e July 26, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2007

Clerk
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 14 July 2005

in Case C-107/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo in Comité Andaluz de Agricultura Ecológica v Administración General del Estado, Comité Aragonés de Agricultura Ecológica (1)

(Community rules on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs - National legislation authorising the use of the term ‘bio’ in respect of products which have not been organically produced)

(2005/C 217/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-107/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain), made by decision of 1 December 2003, received at the Court on 1 March 2004, in the proceedings between Comité Andaluz de Agricultura Ecológica and Administración General del Estado, Comité Aragonés de Agricultura Ecológica — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, M. Ilešič and E. Levits, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 July 2005, in which it ruled:

----

(1)OJ C 94 of 17.04.2004.

----
## NO. 12

- 14

- 00070

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

PRESTON ROBERT MOODY

, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 217T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEX AS

MEMORANDU

M OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant

and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion

to dismiss is granted , and the appeal is dismisse d

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered April 17 , 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 17, 2014

NO. 12

- 14

- 00070

- CR

PRESTON ROBERT MOODY

,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 217th District Court

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2013

- 0506)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of t he Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle , J

.
Freddie SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1972

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
----

Action brought on 26 May 2005 by Jean-Luc Delplancke and Matteo Governatori against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-213/05)

(2005/C 193/63)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 26 May 2005 by Jean-Luc Delplancke, residing in Braine-le-Comte (Belgium), and Matteo Governatori, residing in Saint-Josse-ten-Node (Belgium), represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Xavier Martin, Albert Coolen, Jean Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those relied on in Cases T-130/05, T-160/05, T-162/05, T-170/05, T-183/05 and similar to those relied on in Cases T-58/05, T-164/05, T-192/05 and T-201/05.

----
Kevin FITSER, Appellant, v. Marlene MENELLY, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1319

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Scott McNabb, National Center for Public Health Informatics, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., (E-78), Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone (404) 498-6427, Fax (404) 498-6235.

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: March 23, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-7166 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 761 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to limit the eligibility 

for nomination to serve as Speaker of the House of Representatives 

to Members and Members-elect of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 6, 2023 

Mr. BOYLE of Pennsylvania (for himself, Ms. PORTER, Mr. MFUME, Mr. 

CARSON, Mr. GOMEZ, and Mr. CORREA) submitted the following resolution 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

limit the eligibility for nomination to serve as Speaker 

of the House of Representatives to Members and Members-elect of the House. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Mandating that 

4 being an Elected Member Be an Essential Requirement 

5 for Speakership Resolution’’ or the ‘‘MEMBERS Resolu6 tion’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 761 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LIMITING ELIGIBILITY FOR NOMINATION TO 

2 SPEAKER TO MEMBERS AND MEMBERS3 ELECT. 

4 Rule I of the Rules of the House of Representatives 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following new clause: 

6 ‘‘Eligibility for nomination to serve as Speaker 

7 ‘‘13. An individual is not eligible to be nominated to 

8 serve as Speaker unless the individual is a Member, Dele9 gate, or Resident Commissioner (or, in the case of a nomi10 nation made prior to the beginning of the Congress in 

11 which the individual would serve as Speaker, is a Member12 elect, Delegate-elect, or Resident Commissioner-elect).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Danny MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5481

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 19, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Asia Global Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Asia Global Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Asia Global Holdings Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: May 18, 2011
/s/ Ping-Shun LaiPing-Shun Lai, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. William F. CRENSHAW, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2464

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
November 18 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ASIF AEJAZ , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00088

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______ _________________________ This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to dismiss the appeal. Having considered the motion , the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order t he mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael P. WindischMichael P. WindischChief Financial Officer
Gregory BLUE v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES

CR-15-1054

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 7, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**921.2 CAE 15-01445**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF FRANK VESCERA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

JORDAN KARP AND ROSE GRIMALDI, COMMISSIONERS OF ONEIDA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, AND ROSE ANN CONVERTINO, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

RICHARD E. KAPLAN, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

DAVID G. GOLDBAS, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT ROSE ANN CONVERTINO.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Patrick F. MacRae, J.), entered August 24, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to the Election Law. The order dismissed the petition with prejudice.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in Matter of Vescera v Karp ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Sept. 8, 2015]).

Entered: September 8, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
William F. MANN v. STATE

CR-15-0105

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 474 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to place a real time 

display of the United States total outstanding national debt in the 

House Chamber. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2023 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself, Mr. POSEY, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Ms. 

MACE, Mr. ROSE, Mr. BRECHEEN, Mr. PERRY, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. OGLES, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. 

SANTOS, Mr. BURLISON, Mrs. LUNA, and Mrs. KIGGANS of Virginia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to place 

a real time display of the United States total outstanding 

national debt in the House Chamber. 

Whereas, on May 31, 2023, the United States national debt 

is at $31.818 trillion; 

Whereas the national debt has increased by $3.9 trillion since 

President Biden took office; 

Whereas the Federal budget deficit according to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections for fiscal year 

2023 is $1.4 trillion; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 474 IH 

Whereas the budget deficit is projected to increase by an additional $17 trillion by 2033; 

Whereas the national debt is now projected to increase from 

$24.3 trillion in 2022 to $46.4 trillion by 2033; 

Whereas the debt per taxpayer is over $248,040 as of May 

31, 2023; 

Whereas the national debt to gross domestic product (GDP) 

ratio is 120 percent; 

Whereas the CBO estimates the national debt to GDP ratio 

will surpass 200 percent by 2053; and 

Whereas the national debt will continue to rise at an alarmingly fast pace unless Congress acts to reduce reckless 

government spending: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK IN 

3 HOUSE CHAMBER. 

4 (a) RESPONSIBILITIES OF CLERK.—The Clerk of the 

5 House of Representatives shall place a real time display 

6 of the United States total outstanding national debt, as 

7 calculated by the Secretary of the Treasury, in the House 

8 Chamber in clear view of the Members. 

9 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Clerk shall carry out this 

10 resolution in accordance with regulations promulgated by 

11 the Committee on House Administration, in consultation 

12 with the Committee on the Budget. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32
----------




                       CERTIFICATIONS OF
      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   ---------------------------------------------------------



     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of JMB/245 PARK AVENUE
ASSOCIATES, LTD.





By:    /s/  Patrick J. Meara     By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
       ----------------------        ----------------------------
       Patrick J. Meara              Gailen J. Hull
       Chief Executive Officer       Chief Financial Officer and
                                     Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31 

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Smitten, CEO and CFO,certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Stock Market Solutions,          Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make          the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements          were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly          report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and          procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the          registrant and we have: 

    a)                 designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others          within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly          report is being prepared; 

    b)                 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this report based on such evaluation; and 

    c)                 disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to          materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial          reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over          financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee          of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent          function): 

    a)                 all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

    b)                 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting.