T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T G EO FFREY J A CO BS, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. S T A T E O F A R IZ O N A , a gov ernm ent al e n t i ty ; AR I Z ON A D E P AR T ME NT OF P U B L IC S A F E T Y , D P S , a pol i t i ca l subd i vi si on of the S t at e of A ri zona; R O B E R T H A L L I D A Y , i ndi vi dua l l ya nd i n h i s o f f i c i a l c ap a c i tya s D i r e c t o ro f D PS; B R E N D A H A L L ID A Y ; P E N N IE G I L L E T T E - S T R O U D , i n he rof f i c i a l a nd i n d i v i du a l c ap a c i ty ; L AU R I E GR I F F I T H, i n h er o ffi ci al an di n d i v i du al cap aci ty; AMI HA L L I DA Y; GR E GO R Y S T R OU D; T I MOT HY GR I F F I T H, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16078 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 0 -cv -0 1 4 9 3 -R JB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona R obe rtJ . B ry an, S e ni orD i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d and S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r5, 2012 S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia 

# FI LED NO V 28 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , K L E IN F E L D , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G e o f f r e yJ a c o b s ap p e a l s th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt ’ s d i s mi s s a l o f h i s 4 2 U . S. C. § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n c la im in g v io la tio n o f h is c iv il r ig h ts a r is in g o u t o f a n a lle g e d ly un l aw ful se ar ch and sei zure of hi s c om pu t er . H e c on t ends thatthe se ar ch c o n s titu te da n in v a s io n o f r ig h ts th a t le dto in f

o rm a tio n le a d in g in tu rn to h is te rm in a tio n f

r o m th e A r iz o n aD e p artm e n t o f P ub lic S a f

e ty . H e u n s u c c e s s f

u lly c ha l l e nge d tha tt e rm i na t i on i n A r i z onaa dm i ni s tr a t i ve pr oc e e di ngs , c l a i m i ng v io la tio n o f

h is c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts , b u t a d m ittin g to th e u n d e r ly in g m is c o n du c t. H e d idn o t ap p e a l to th e s ta te tr ia l c o u rt. T h e d i s tr i c tc o u rtd i s m i s s e dth i s a c t i o n , ru l i n g th a tu n d e rAr i z o n as t a t e l a w, J a c obs ’ s c ons t i tut i ona l c l a i m s w e r e ba rr e d byr e s j udi c a t a . I tr e l i e d on O l son v. Mo rr is , 188 F . 3d 1083 ( 9th C i r . 1999) , w hi c h he l d tha tapl a i nt i f f’ s s e c t i on 1983 c la im s in f

e d e r a l c o u rt w e r e b arr e db yr e s ju d ic a taw h e n th e p la in tif f f a ile dto ap p e a l an a d m in is tr a tiv e d e c is io n to a n A r iz o n as ta te c o u rt w ith ju r is d ic tio n to a d j u d i c a t e th e c o n s t i tu t i o n a l c l a i ms . J a c o b s c o n t e n d s th a th i s f e d e r a l c l a i ms in v o lv e c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts th a t c o u ldn o t h a v e b e e n a d m in is tr a tiv e lya d ju d ic a te d . U nd er O l

s on , h o w e v e r , if

th e yc o u ldh a v e b e e n a d ju d ic a te din a n ap p e a l to th e s ta te court , they are barr ed by re s j ud i cat a. 18 8 F . 3d at10 84 –8 7. L i ke O l s on , J a c o b s is3

att em pt i ng t o chal l enge the basi s f or hi s t erm i nat i on by bri ng i ng a c on st i tut i on al c la im in f

e d e r a l c o u rt a f

te rth e s ta te p r o c e e d in g s b e c a m e f in a l. In thi s i nst ance , nei ther party has ci t ed A ri zona prece dentgo i ng ei ther w ay on w he the ra n A r i z onac ourt , on r e vi e w of the a dm i ni s tr a t i ve t e rm i na t i on p r o c e e d in g , w o u ldh a v e r e a c h e dth e c o n s titu tio n a l is s u e s J a c o b s s e e k s to ad j u d i cat e, as th ey m ay n o tb e p ert i n en tt o th e p ro p ri ety o f h i s t erm i n at i o n as a m a tt e rof s t a t e l aw . B utc ar e f

ul r e vi e w of

the c om pl a i ntr e f

l e c t s tha tJ a c obs i s not s e e k in g r e d r e s s f

o ra n yin ju r ie s o th e rth an th o s e a r is in g o u t o f h is te rm in a tio n . H is f e de r a l c om pl a i nts oughtba c k pay , r e t i r e m e ntbe ne f i t s , a nd othe rc om pe ns a t i on re l at ed t o h i s e m pl oym entand t erm i nat i on . T he re l i ef he se eks, i nclud i ng the pl ea f ore m ot i ona l di s tr e s s , a l l a r i s e f r om hi s t e rm i na t i on. A s the t e rm i na t i on d et erm i n at i o n i t sel f i s res j u d i cat a, Jaco b s can n o tseekan y rel i ef o n th e p rem i se th a t th e te rm in a tio n w a s w r o n g f u l. Se e O l

s on , 188 F . 3d a t1086 ( “ I n A r i z ona , the fa i l ure t o see k j ud i ci alre vi ew of an adm i ni strat i ve order prec l ud es col l at er alatt ac k o f th e o r d e rin as e p ar a te c o m p la in t.” ) . A FFI R M ED .