alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC PENSION INVESTORS '84 MARCH 31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,320
<PP&E>                                       5,001,977
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,794,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,626,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,111
<BONDS>                                      1,463,824
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,967,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,626,766
<SALES>                                        143,659
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,747
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,123
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,123
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

VOESTALPINE STAHL GMBH,

Appellant

v.

ARCELORMITTAL,

Appellee

______________________ 

2016-1407

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,214, 

95/001,350, 95/001,353.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MAXWELL JAMES PETERSEN, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard 

& Smith, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant.

 DAVID JAMES CUSHING, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

RICHARD CLAY TURNER; MARK JAMES DEBOY, Edell 

Shapiro and Finnan, Gaithersburg, MD.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
----

Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between Tarbes (Lourdes-Pyrénées) and Paris (Orly)

(2005/C 149/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
#### Robert Elson et al., Respondents, v Kenneth M. Defren et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Howard Goldfracht et al., Respondents, v Kenneth M. Defren et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

*362[719 NYS2d 246]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about June 25, 1999, which, in consolidated actions for personal injuries sustained in a two-car collision in Idaho by the two injured plaintiffs while passengers in the car driven by the individual defendant and leased by the latter’s employer and codefendant, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the actions on the ground of forum non conveniens, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about October 29, 1999, which granted the cross motion of Action No. 1 plaintiffs for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants fail to explain why the testimony of the Idaho police officers who responded to the accident is necessary or cannot be obtained by deposition, why they are concerned about not being able to implead the Idaho Department of Transportation, or otherwise show why this matter should be tried in Idaho, not New York. Favoring retention in New York is the fact that the injured plaintiffs, their wives, who assert derivative claims, and the individual defendant are all New York residents, as well as the convenience of the numerous New York medical witnesses who treated the injured plaintiffs over an extensive time period. As for the granting of partial summary judgment, the motion court properly concluded that defendants failed to controvert the moving plaintiffs’ prima facie showing that defendant driver’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident, as demonstrated by documentary evidence that, in connection with the accident, the driver pleaded guilty to Idaho traffic violations for “inattentive/ careless” driving and “unlawful drive on highways laned for traffic.” In this regard, we note that under Idaho law any evidence of icy road conditions at the accident site, about which defendants only speculate, would be insufficient, as a matter of law, to excuse the statutory violations to which the driver admitted (see, *Teply v Lincoln,*125 Idaho 773, 776, 874 P2d 584). Moreover, as the IAS Court pointed out, the opposing papers do not include an affidavit explaining the collision from the perspective of the driver, defendant Defren. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TREVARIOUS J. PRIDE , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 023

- 2403

[ April 25, 2024 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Lawrence M. Mirman

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 5620 04 CF 001648A

.
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District

, West Palm Beach, for appella nt.

Trevarious J. Pride

, Bowling Green

, appellant.

No appearance f or appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ROSS , M AY and A RTAU , JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
exv10w16



 





			
	
	 	Exhibit 10.16






November 17, 2006




Steve McLaughlin

1220 Bridgetown Pike

Langhorne, PA 19053




Dear Mr. McLaughlin:




     Activant Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Activant”), is pleased to inform you
that you are eligible to receive a retention bonus of $113,750.00 (the “Bonus”), payable
in five equal annual installments, as provided below, as a reward for your continued
employment with Activant or one of its subsidiaries:



	 	 	 
	Date of Bonus Payment	 	Amount of Bonus
	September 30, 2007
	 	20%
	September 30, 2008
	 	20%
	September 30, 2009
	 	20%
	September 30, 2010
	 	20%
	September 30, 2011
	 	20%





Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of the consummation of a Change in Control (as
defined in the Amended and Restated Activant Group Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan) of
Activant, all annual installments set forth above not previously paid shall become
immediately due and payable upon such consummation, subject to the following paragraph of
this letter.




     You must be employed by Activant or one of its subsidiaries, whether as an employee,
consultant or advisor, at the time each installment is payable in order to earn and receive
such installment, but there are no other conditions to the Bonus. In the event that your
service relationship with Activant or one of its subsidiaries terminates prior to the time
any annual installment is payable, you will forfeit that and all subsequent installments.
Activant may withhold from the Bonus any such Federal, state, local or other taxes,
including applicable taxes of any jurisdiction outside the United States, as shall be
required to be withheld pursuant to any applicable law or regulation.



     You understand that the Bonus made available to you hereunder does not constitute a
guarantee of continued employment with Activant or one of its subsidiaries, and that your
service relationship with Activant or its subsidiaries is at will. As such, you or
Activant or its subsidiaries may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason
or no reason, either with or without cause or advance notice. In addition, Activant and
its subsidiaries retain the right to modify your compensation and benefits, other than
this Bonus, within their sole discretion, upon notice to you, to the fullest extent
allowed by law.



 









 






     Unless otherwise determined by Activant’s Board of Directors, any payments made hereunder will
not be taken into account in computing your salary or compensation for the purposes of determining
any benefits or compensation under (i) any retirement, life insurance or other benefit plan of
Activant or (ii) any agreement between Activant and you.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Sincerely,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Greg Petersen	 	 
	 

	 	 

Greg Petersen,
	 	 
	 

	 	Executive Vice President
Exhibit 20.01

                    UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF DIRECTORS
                     TO CORPORATE ACTION WITHOUT MEETING
                                BY ASDAR Group.
                             A Nevada corporation


         The undersigned, Robert Waters, Robert Klein and Jack Sha are the
only members of, and therefore, constitute, the Board of Directors of ASDAR
Group, a Nevada corporation, and hereby consent, by this writing, to take the
following action, to adopt the following resolutions, and to transact the
following business of this corporation:

         WHEREAS, the company has accepted the resignation of Jack Sha as
Secretary Treasurer and Director of the Corporation, effective immediately.

         RESOLVED, that Jack Sha shall be removed as signing authority on all
bank accounts related to ASDAR Group and any of its subsidiaries, effective
immediately.

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that Robert Klein, Robert Waters and Joseph
Beyrouti. Any two of the above will have authorization to sign on such
accounts.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this consent as of
the 28th day of March, 2001.



DATED:  March 28, 2001                   /s/ Robert Waters
                                             ----------------------
                                             Robert Waters
                                             President and Director


DATED:  March 28, 2001                   /s/ Robert Klein
                                             ----------------------
                                             Robert Klein
                                             Director


DATED:  March 28, 2001                   /s/ Jack Sha
                                             ----------------------
                                             Jack Sha
                                             Secretary and Director
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Dynasty Capital, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Jay Lutsky,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Jay LutskyJay Lutsky, Chief Financial Officer December 21, 2009
Clint Steven BROWN, Appellant, v. Angela Sue BROWN, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-939

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Performance Goals for the Chief Executive Officer 2010 Fiscal Year Bonus



 Exhibit 10.36 
 2010 PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR 
 CEO SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE
BONUS 
  

						
	 Performance Criteria
	  	 Goals and Minimum and Maximum Thresholds
	  	Allocation of
Target Amount ($) (1)
	San Jose Water Company ROE for 2010 Fiscal Year	  	 Target Goal: 10.13%
  
 Minimum Threshold: 8.63%
  
 Maximum Goal: 11.13%
	  	$	104,170
			
	Compliance (Environmental)	  	Maximum Goal: Zero water quality or other environmental violations (Goal and Minimum Threshold are not applicable).	  	$	26,040
			
	 San Jose Water Company
 Operational Goals (2)
	  	 Target Goal: Achieve 80% of identified key water industry objectives measured primarily in terms of service, reliability and
efficiency.
  
 Minimum Threshold: Achieve 70% of identified water
industry objectives.
  
 Maximum Goal: Achieve 90% of identified key
water industry objectives.
	  	$	26,040

  

	1)	The target 2010 annual cash bonus amount is equal to $156,250, which is 25 percent of Mr. Roth’s base salary per his employment agreement. The actual bonus
may range from 0% to 150% of the target amount based on the Committee determination of the achievement of the performance goals: 

  

	 	•	 	 If the goal is attained, 100 percent of the allocated amount will be paid. 


  

	 	•	 	 If only the minimum threshold is attained, then 50 percent of the allocated amount will be paid. 


  

	 	•	 	 If the maximum goal is attained, then 150 percent of the allocated amount will be paid. 


  

	 	•	 	 Should the actual level of attainment of any such performance goal be between two of the designated levels, then the bonus potential will be
interpolated on a straight-line basis. 


  

	2)	The key water industry objectives will be established by March 30, 2010.
CHARLESTON.

#### Damron *v.*Ferguson.

*(Green, Judge, absent.)

Submitted January 10, 1889.

Decided January 29, 1889.

1. WRIT OF ERROR.

An order overruling a motion to set aside a verdict of a jury and refusing to grant a new trial-is not such an order or judgment as will authorize a writ of error to this Court.

2. Writ of Error — Final Judgment.

In order to authorize a writ of error there must be a final judg. ment on the verdict.

*Z. T. Vinson*for plaintiff in error.

*H. K. Shumate*for defendant in error.

*

On account of illness.

English, Judge :

This was a writ of error allowed from an order of the Cir*34cuit Court of Wayne county entered oil the 6th day of June, 1885, overruling a motion then made by the plaintiff to set aside the verdict of the jury therein renden d and award him a new trial. An examination of the record discloses the fact, that no judgment was ever rendered by said Circuit Court upon said verdict, and, there being no final judgment in the cause and no order, from which a writ of error would lie to this Court, the writ of error awarded to the plaintiff must be dismissed as having been prematurely allowed, with costs against the plaintiff in error.

Dismissed.
Melodi MCLAIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Elias Lou ABUSAID, Jr., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1736

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied. Denied as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000746631
<NAME> ASDAR INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   738
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,894
<OTHER-SE>                                    (30,922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       738
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,632)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,632)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

Certification of CFO under Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*I certify that this periodic report containing the issuer’sfinancial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andthat information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theissuer.*
|   | * * | * *                   | *By:*                                                                           | */s/ John F. Coger* | * * |
|--------|----------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------|
|   |     |                       |                                                                            |                |
|   |     |                       |                                                                            |                |
|   |     |                       | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Chief  Operating Officer |
|   |     |                       |                                                                            |                |
|   |     |                       |                                                                            |                |
|   | Date:    | November 7, 2007 |                                                                            |                |     |
|        |          |                            |                                                                                 |                     |          |  |

 

----
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the annual report of Liberator, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Louis S. Friedman, Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of WES Consulting, Inc.*, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





Date:
      May 7, 2010
            /s/
      Louis S. FriedmanLouis
      S. FriedmanChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of WES Consulting, Inc.
      *




* On
October 19, 2009, Liberator, Inc. merged with and into WES Consulting,
Inc.  As WES Consulting, Inc. is the surviving entity from such merger
and Liberator, Inc. has been merged out, this certification is signed by the
Principal Executive Officer of WES Consulting, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC.





FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I am the Chief Executive Officer of BioCancell Therapeutics Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-K”).





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date: March 18, 2010/s/ URI DANONUri DanonChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of CEO
      and CFOPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant
      toSection 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofORGANA GARDENS INTERNATIONAL INC.for the
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jaclyn Cruz, as the
equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:  (1)   The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  /s/Jaclyn CruzName: Jaclyn CruzDate: May 17, 2010  This
certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.