13270 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices 

What approaches to expanding available 

resources are most promising? What 

objectives could be met and in what 

time frame if additional resources were 

available? 

B. Experiences of Persons Within the 

United States With Respect To 

Accessing Foreign Works or Sharing 

Accessible Copies of U.S. Works With 

Foreign Persons 

Please comment on the experiences of 

the blind or persons with other 

disabilities with respect to accessing 

foreign works within the United States, 

or sharing accessible copies of U.S. 

works with similarly-situated persons 

outside the United States. What kinds of 

specific policies, practices and projects 

exist or are emerging in the education, 

library and business sectors? How do 

existing laws create incentives or 

constrain efforts? Please describe the 

ways in which technology has 

influenced or could assist in providing 

access to foreign works or the sharing of 

accessible copies. What are the legal or 

practical impediments to transnational 

access and how are they interrelated? 

C. Other Comments on Facilitating and 

Enhancing Access to Copyrighted Works 

Please comment on the likely success 

of measures identified above under the 

subsection entitled ‘‘Possible Actions’’ 

under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 

How might the measures best be 

leveraged, alone or in combination, to 

enhance access for the blind or other 

persons with disabilities? Are there 

additional governmental or private 

sector actions that might serve the 

objective of enhancing access to 

copyrighted works for the blind or 

persons with other disabilities? 

Dated: March 20, 2009. 

Maria Pallante, 

Associate Register for Policy & International 

Affairs, U.S. Copyright Office. 

[FR Doc. E9–6637 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–30–P 

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH 

REVIEW COMMISSION 

Meeting; Sunshine Act 

March 20, 2009. 

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, 

March 26, 2009. 

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing 

Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

STATUS: Open. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The 

Commission will consider and act upon 

the following in open session: Peter J. 

Phillips v. A&S Construction Co., 

Docket No. WEST 2008–1057–DM. 

(Issues include whether, under section 

105(c)(2) of the Mine Act, an order of 

temporary reinstatement remains in 

effect after the Secretary of Labor has 

determined, following her investigation, 

that no unlawful discrimination has 

occurred.) 

Any person attending this meeting 

who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as 

sign language interpreters, must inform 

the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) 

and § 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean 

Ellen (202) 434–9950/(202) 708–9300 

for TDD Relay/1–800–877–8339 for toll 

free. 

[FR Doc. E9–6843 Filed 3–24–09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection, 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The National Science 

Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans 

to request clearance for this collection. 

In accordance with the requirement of 

Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing 

opportunity for public comment on this 

action. After obtaining and considering 

public comment, NSF will prepare the 

submission requesting OMB clearance 

of this collection for no longer than 

three years. 

Comments are invited on (a) whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the Agency, 

including whether the information shall 

have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of 

the Agency’s estimate of the burden of 

the proposed collection of information; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information on 

respondents, including through the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology; 

and (d) ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on 

respondents, including through the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received by May 26, 2009, to be assured 

of consideration. Comments received 

after that date will be considered to the 

extent practicable. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments 

regarding the information collection and 

requests for copies of the proposed 

information collection request should be 

addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports 

Clearance Officer, National Science 

Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 

Room 295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by 

e-mail to splimpton@nsf.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292–7556 or 

send e-mail to splimpton@nsf.gov. 

Individuals who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, 

Monday through Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title of Collection: DUE Project Data 

Form. 

OMB Control No.: 3145–0201. 

Expiration Date of Approval: August 

31, 2009. 

Abstract: The Division of 

Undergraduate Education (DUE) Project 

Data Form is a component of all grant 

proposals submitted to NSF’s Division 

of Undergraduate Education. This form 

collects information needed to direct 

proposals to appropriate reviewers and 

to report the estimated collective impact 

of proposed projects on institutions, 

students, and faculty members. 

Requested information includes the 

discipline of the proposed project, 

collaborating organizations involved in 

the project, the academic level on which 

the project focuses (e.g., lower-level 

undergraduate courses, upper-level 

undergraduate courses), characteristics 

of the organization submitting the 

proposal, special audiences (if any) that 

the project would target (e.g., women, 

minorities, persons with disabilities), 

strategic foci (if any) of the project (e.g., 

research on teaching and learning, 

international activities, integration of 

research and education), and the 

number of students and faculty at 

different educational levels who would 

benefit from the project. 

Respondents: Investigators who 

submit proposals to NSF’s Division of 

Undergraduate Education. 

Estimated Number of Annual 

Respondents: 2,500. 

Burden on the Public: 20 minutes (per 

response) for an annual total of 833 

hours. 

Dated: March 23, 2009. 

Suzanne H. Plimpton, 

Reports Clearance Officer, National Science 

Foundation. 

[FR Doc. E9–6746 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P