Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules 14103 

exempts the system of records entitled 

‘‘PBGC–17, Office of Inspector General 

Investigative File System—PBGC’’ from 

the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), 

(d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and 

(H), and (f) for the same reasons as 

stated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, 

that is, because the system contains 

investigatory material compiled for law 

enforcement purposes other than 

material within the scope of subsection 

552a(j)(2). 

(2) Reasons for exemption. The 

reasons for asserting this exemption are 

because the disclosure and other 

requirements of the Privacy Act could 

substantially compromise the efficacy 

and integrity of the Office of Inspector 

General operations. Disclosure could 

invade the privacy of other individuals 

and disclose their identity when they 

were expressly promised 

confidentiality. Disclosure could 

interfere with the integrity of 

information which would otherwise be 

subject to privileges, see, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 

552(b)(5), and which could interfere 

with other important law enforcement 

concerns, see, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7). 

(c) Federal Civilian or Contract 

Employment—(1) Exemption. Under the 

authority granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), 

the PBGC hereby exempts the system of 

records entitled ‘‘PBGC–17, Office of 

Inspector General Investigative File 

System—PBGC’’ from the provisions of 

5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), 

(e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) because 

the system contains investigatory 

material compiled for the purpose of 

determining eligibility or qualifications 

for federal civilian or contract 

employment. 

(2) Reason for exemption. The reason 

for asserting this exemption is to protect 

from disclosure the identity of a 

confidential source when an express 

promise of confidentiality has been 

given to obtain information from 

sources who would otherwise be 

unwilling to provide necessary 

information. 

Issued in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of 

March, 2009. 

Vincent K. Snowbarger, 

Acting Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. E9–6973 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7709–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 09–650; MB Docket No. 08–101; RM– 

11438] 

Television Broadcasting Services; Ann 

Arbor, MI 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Dismissal. 

SUMMARY: The Commission dismisses 

the pending rulemaking petition filed by 

Paxson Communications License 

Company, LLC (‘‘Paxson’’), permittee of 

WPXD–DT, post-transition digital 

television channel 31, which proposes 

to substitute digital television channel 

19 for post-transition digital television 

channel 31 at Ann Arbor, Michigan. 

Paxson’s proposed channel substitution 

requires coordination and concurrence 

with the Canadian government because 

the proposed facility is located within 

the Canadian coordination zone. The 

Canadian government has indicated that 

Paxson’s proposed channel substitution 

is not acceptable. Therefore, the 

Commission cannot approve Paxson’s 

rulemaking petition. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adrienne Y. Denysyk, Media Bureau, 

(202) 418–1600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Order, 

MB Docket No. 08–101, adopted March 

18, 2009, and released March 20, 2009. 

The full text of this document is 

available for public inspection and 

copying during normal business hours 

in the FCC’s Reference Information 

Center at Portals II, CY–A257, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

This document will also be available via 

ECFS (http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). 

(Documents will be available 

electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/ 

or Adobe Acrobat.) This document may 

be purchased from the Commission’s 

duplicating contractor, Best Copy and 

Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, 

telephone 1–800–478–3160 or via e-mail 

http://www.BCPIWEB.com. To request 

this document in accessible formats 

(computer diskettes, large print, audio 

recording, and Braille), send an e-mail 

to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the 

Commission’s Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 

418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 

(TTY). This document does not contain 

information collection requirements 

subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

information collection burden ‘‘for 

small business concerns with fewer than 

25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small 

Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, 

Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. 

This document is not subject to the 

Congressional Review Act. (The 

Commission, is, therefore, not required 

to submit a copy of this Order to the 

Government Accountability Office, 

pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) since this 

proposed rule is dismissed, herein.) 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Clay C. Pendarvis, 

Associate Chief, Video Division, Media 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. E9–7032 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 09–638; MB Docket No. 09–33; RM– 

11521] 

Television Broadcasting Services; 

Derby, KS 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission requests 

comments on a channel substitution 

proposed by Entravision Holdings, LLC 

(‘‘Entravision’’), the permittee of KDCU– 

DT, DTV channel 46, Derby, Kansas. 

Entravision requests the substitution of 

DTV channel 31 for post-transition DTV 

channel 46 at Derby. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before April 14, 2009, and reply 

comments on or before April 24, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20554. In addition to filing comments 

with the FCC, interested parties should 

serve counsel for petitioner as follows: 

Barry A. Friedman, Esq., Thompson 

Hine LLP, 1920 N Street, NW., Suite 

800, Washington, DC 20036. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adrienne Y. Denysyk, 

adrienne.denysyk@fcc.gov, Media 

Bureau, (202) 418–1600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

09–33, adopted March 17, 2009, and 

released March 19, 2009. The full text 

of this document is available for public 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS