alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* P ursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-20010 Summary Calendar

_____________________
ANTHONY EUGENE GILL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-3109)

_________________________________________________________________ September 16, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Anthony Eugene Gill, Texas prisoner # 647051, is BARRED from

proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) unde r the Prison Litigation

Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because, on at least three

prior occasions while incarcerated, Gill has brought an action or

a ppeal in a court of the United States that was dismi ssed as

frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief could

be granted. S ee Gill v. Thornton

, No. 96-11478 (5th Cir. June 17,

1997) (unpublished; appeal dismissed as frivolous in case dismissed- 2 -

by district court as frivolous); Gill v. Texas Dep’t of Criminal

Justice

, No. 95-20723 (5th Cir. Jan. 23, 1996) (unpublished;

affirming district court’s dismissal of § 1983 ac tion as

frivolous); see also Adepegba v. Hammons
, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th

Cir. 1996) (dismissal of appeal as frivolous in case dismissed by

district court as frivolous counts as two str ikes ; affirmance of

district court’s dismissal as frivolous counts as one strike).

Accordingly, Gill’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED
, and he may not

proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is in

prison u nless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED

.

Gill has 30 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full

appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court,

should he wish to reinstate his appeal.

IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 14, 2015

Order 

July 14, 2015

151369 & (38)

SUSAN H. FARR, CAROLYN D. SCHUTTLER,

and BYRON PRANGE,

Plaintiffs,

and

TRACY LEE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

ST. JOHNS PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

ST. JOHNS BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Defendant.

SC: 151369

COA: 319236

Clinton CC: 12-011074-CD

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to any 

party.
H. Streamlining the State Process for SIP Developme nt and

Submittal As stated earlier in this preamble, we recognize th at the deadline we are giving states to submit their SIP r evisions is expeditious. EPA understands that each state must determine whether its own regulatory development process allo ws for streamlining, and we defer to the states on the ext ent to which they may choose to streamline the process. Given t he exigencies, we believe a streamlining approach coul d be beneficial to a state in meeting its deadline. We are prepared to work with the states to develop methods to strea mline the state administrative process, although we recognize that the states remain fully in charge of their own state pr ocesses. We solicit recommendations during the comment period f or ways to streamline the state process for adopting and submi tting these SIPs, and to streamline or simplify what is require d for the SIP submittal. For example, we may streamline the process as it concerns public hearing requirements. Many states require that the underlying state regulation that the state inte nds to develop into the SIP submittal undergo a public hea ring. In addition, the CAA requires that the state provide a public hearing on the proposed SIP submittal, under CAA 11 0(a)(2). EPA will accept the hearing that the state holds on the underlyingregulation as meeting the requirement for the heari ng on the SIP

submittal . We believe that this approach is fully consisten t with the Clean Air Act, which requires only that , as lo ng as the state provide s adequate public notice of the hearing, and does and EPA will not require two a separate state-level SIP hearing s . We solicit comment on this streamlining approach, i ts acceptability under the Clean Air Act, and on any o ther recommendations that may be useful to the states fo r streamlining their SIP development and submittal pr ocesses.

Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00599-CV

Alfredo Losoya

v.

Mission Housing Authority, Self-Insured

On Appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-7293-13-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 8, 2016
Antonio BADILLO, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT, O/B/O Carmen Antonia GUTIERREZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0812

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
H. Res. 681 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 14, 2023. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1435) to 

amend the Clean Air Act to prevent the elimination of the 

sale of internal combustion engines. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 

the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 721 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 721

  Expressing support for the designation of September 2023 as ``Peace 
    Month'' and calling on Congress to take action to promote peace.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2023

 Ms. Norton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the designation of September 2023 as ``Peace 
    Month'' and calling on Congress to take action to promote peace.

Whereas the United Nations designated September 21 ``International Day of 
        Peace''--otherwise known as Peace Day;
Whereas the United Nations General Assembly declared Peace Day as a day devoted 
        to ``commemorating and strengthening the ideals of peace, both within 
        and among all nations and peoples'';
Whereas all United Nations member states, organizations, regional and 
        nongovernmental organizations, and individuals are encouraged to 
        celebrate and recognize global peace efforts on Peace Day;
Whereas Peace Day represents shared hopes of an end to conflict in all forms;
Whereas the United Nations calls for a 24-hour global cease fire on Peace Day;
Whereas this year's Peace Day theme is ``Actions for Peace: Our Ambition for the 
        #Global Goals'';
Whereas 2018 marked the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human 
        Rights, a milestone development in contemporary human history promoting 
        peace and well-being worldwide;
Whereas violent conflicts could cost upwards of $14.4 trillion per year 
        globally;
Whereas global peace promotion efforts improve the lives of Americans and all 
        peoples;
Whereas the United States has a long history of promoting peace and human rights 
        at home and abroad; and
Whereas September would be an appropriate month to designate as Peace Month: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Peace Month''; and
            (2) calls on Congress to promote peace, both at home and 
        abroad.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael P. Windisch
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sealy Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
August 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lawrence J. Rogers, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and Jeffrey
C. Ackerman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



September 29,
2009

/s/ LAWRENCE J. ROGERS Lawrence J. Rogers President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ JEFFREY C. ACKERMAN Jeffrey C. Ackerman Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Juan Oscar DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4943

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Z.J.M., Appellant, v. C.E.M., Respondent.

No. ED 106690

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: July 23, 2019

Jesse A. Granneman, 20 Manor Drive, Troy, MO 63379, for appellant.

Michelle M. Funkenbusch, 2901 Dougherty Ferry Rd, Ste. 100, St. Louis, MO 63122, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

*859Z.J.M. appeals the judgment of the trial court determining paternity, child custody, and child support for a minor child. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EX PARTE James Charley MOON

CR-15-1421

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 7, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
H. Res. 194 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 7, 2023. 

Resolved, 

SECTION 1. ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO JOINT COMMITTEE OF 

CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY AND JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING. 

(a) JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY.—The following Members are hereby elected to the 

Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, to serve with 

the chair of the Committee on House Administration and the 

chair of the Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch of the 

Committee on Appropriations: 

(1) Mr. Carey. 

(2) Mr. Morelle. 

(3) Ms. Sewell. 

(b) JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING.—The following 

Members are hereby elected to the Joint Committee on Printing, to serve with the chair of the Committee on House Administration: 

(1) Mr. Griffith. 
2 

•HRES 194 EH 

(2) Mr. Murphy. 

(3) Mr. Morelle. 

(4) Mr. Kilmer. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00109-CR 

 

CASEY OWENS, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 364th District Court 

 Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2018-414,051, Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding 

May 25, 2022 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Appellant Casey Owens was convicted of 

murder1 and sentenced to forty years’ confinement. The trial court’s certification of 

appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea bargain case from which appellant 

has no right of appeal and that appellant has waived the right of appeal. The certification 

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(B)(1).
2

comports with the record before the Court. Notwithstanding the certification, appellant

filed a notice of appeal, pro se, challenging his conviction.

We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of 

the record.” By letter of April 21, 2022, we notified appellant of the consequences of the 

trial court’s certification and directed him to file a response demonstrating grounds for 

continuing the appeal by May 2. To date, appellant has not filed a response or had any 

further communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal based on the trial court’s certification. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
EX PARTE Ronald Harrison NEWELL

CR-15-1515

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Jefferson Cir. Ct.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Robert Klein, President and Chief Executive Officer of Avalon Energy

Corporation Ltd., a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 14, 2006



/s/ Robert Klein

----------------

Robert Klein

President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-30245 Conference Calendar

__________________ LIONELL J. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus RICHARD L. STALDER, Warden; C. MARTIN LENSING, Warden; R. NORTH; L. THOMPSON; J. ST. ROMAIN; R. WEBRE; UNKNOWN MARCHAND; UNKNOWN JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1819A-2
- - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lionell J. Davis (#118554) appeals the district court’s sua sponte order granting summary judgment for the defendants. Davis contends that his pleadings raise a valid excessive-force claim. For reasons expressed by the district court, we hold that this appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Hudson v. McMillian , 503 U.S. 1, 6-7 (1992). Because it is frivolous, theNo. 96-30245 -2- appeal is DISMISSED. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Davis is warned that any future frivolous filing will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Davis should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
James W. LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106623

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: June 18, 2019

Jedd C. Scheider, 1000 W. Nifong Blvd., Bldg. 7 Ste. 1000, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

James W. Lewis ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that the motion court did not clearly err, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Rx Technologies Corp., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No.1) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shepard Doniger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: July 18, 2012  /s/ Shepard Doniger Shepard Doniger Chief Financial Officer
David A. TEJERA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1187

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 4, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 28, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 416 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-111, 
CP2018-153.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-28448 Filed 1-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Darrell JOHNSON v. STATE

CR-15-0819

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with this Yearly Report of Bellmore Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
Gruberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. Such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending July  31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bellmore Corporation.
  Date: September 30, 2009
  /s/ Mark Gruberg
 Mark Gruberg
 President, Chief Executive Officer,  Chairman of the Board of Directors
|   | 1. | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K Amendment No. 2 for the year ending March 31,      2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K Amendment No. 2      for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      October 19, 2009 |                                             |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                         | /s/      Sharon Tang                             |   |
|                         | Sharon      Tang                                 |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer                     |
|                         | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |

----