alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:             November 9,      2008                                      |   | By:  /s/ Guy W.      Harris                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |   | Guy      W. Harris                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
Exhibit 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 of EFL OVERSEAS, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Gabriel Jones,            Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:                          1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                          2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.                          Date: October 19, 2009              /s/ Gabriel Jones            Gabriel Jones            President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,             Principal Financial Officer and Director
In the INTEREST OF: N.J.S;

Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. K.S. (Father), Appellant,

S.S. (Mother), Appellant.

WD 81640 Consolidated with WD 81654

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: April 23, 2019

Steven A. Fritz, for Respondent.

K.S., Appellant Pro-se.

Kaitlyn A. Roach, Warrensburg, for Appellant S.S.

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

S.S. (Mother) and K.S. (Father) appeal from the circuit court's judgment assuming jurisdiction over their minor child, N.J.S., concluding that the child was in need of care and treatment under section 211.031.1(1)(a) and (b), RSMo 2016, and placing him in the custody of the Children's Division. Mother asserts six points on appeal, and Father asserts five. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Terry L. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1404

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Royal Style Design, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ivan Sorokoumov, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.




/s/ Ivan
      SorokoumovIvan
      Sorokoumov, Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      19, 2009
EX PARTE Alejandros CASTANEDA

CR-15-0937

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 24, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of TK Star Design, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas P. Kinney, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: April 14, 2011By: /s/ Thomas P. KinneyChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Michael RAMOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 7, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### GALBAN LOBO CO., S. A., Complainant, v. Leon HENDERSON, Price Administrator, Respondent.

No. 6.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided Oct. 16, 1942.

Donald Marks, of New York City, for complainant.

David Ginsburg, Gen. Counsel, Nathaniel Nathanson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Ben W. Heineman, Chief, Court Review Branch, all of Washington, D. C., for the respondent.

Before VINSON, Chief Judge, and MARIS and MAGRUDER, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on respondent’s motion to dismiss the complaint herein to which motion no objections have been interposed.

The motion to dismiss is granted upon the authority of Galban Lobo Company, S. A., v. Leon Henderson, Price Administrator, Em.App., 132 F.2d 153, decided September 30, 1942.

Complaint dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 264 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 264

  Expressing support for the goals of Workplace Eye Wellness Month by 
 promoting the importance of protecting the eyes from increased screen 
                                 time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Payne submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the goals of Workplace Eye Wellness Month by 
 promoting the importance of protecting the eyes from increased screen 
                                 time.

Whereas the rise of computer usage during the COVID-19 pandemic has increased 
        cases of digital eye strain.
Whereas symptoms of digital eye strain, also referred to as computer vision 
        syndrome, include tired, burning, or itching eyes, dry eyes, blurred 
        vision and/or headache.
Whereas the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires 
        that employers take appropriate measures to ensure that their employees 
        are protected against potential workplace eye injuries.
Whereas, to help prevent workplace eye injuries, it is important for individuals 
        to keep the following tips in mind:

    (1) When working at a computer, take breaks every 15 minutes to relax 
the eyes.

    (2) Sit about 30 inches away from the screen.

    (3) Review your work space for potential hazards before starting work.

    (4) Wear protective eyewear in areas that pose the risk of injury.

    (5) Always use appropriate protective eyewear that fits, such as 
goggles, safety glasses, welding helmets, full-face respirators, or face 
shields.

    (6) Stay up-to-date on first aid procedures for common workplace 
injuries and make sure that the first aid kit is well stocked.

    (7) Encourage coworkers and new hires to follow all safety procedures 
to prevent workplace eye injuries.

Whereas March is recognized as Workplace Eye Wellness Month.
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Workplace Eye Wellness 
        Month;
            (2) recognizes the importance of healthy vision; and
            (3) encourages employees to take precautions to avoid 
        workplace eye injuries.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Smitten, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Stock Market
Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

/s/ RICHARD SMITTEN
    ---------------------
Richard Smitten
CEO and CFO

January 6, 2005
A.T., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7046

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TONY MARICHAL SHARP, a/k/a TJ , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III, District Judge. ( 5:13

- cr - 00237

- D

- 2 )

Submitted : December 16, 2021 Decided: December 20, 2021

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges , and KEENAN , Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

. Tony Marichal Sharp , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit

.2 PER CURIAM: Tony Marichal Sharp appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Sta t. 5194. Regarding the denial of relief under § 2255, the district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue abse nt “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s a ssessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck
v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatab le and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sh arp has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss th is portion of the appeal. Turning to the denial of Sharp’s compassionate release motion, we review the district court’s order for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021), cert. denied , No. 21

- 5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021). “A district court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily or irrationally, fails to consider3 judicially recognized factors constraining its exercise of discretion, relies on erroneous factual or legal premises, or commits an error of law.” United S tates v. Dillard , 891 F.3d 151, 158 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors did not warrant release. Therefore, we affirm this por tion of the district court’s order. We deny the motion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRM ED IN PART , DISMISSED IN PART
Presented to:

By:

Date:

Federal Aviation ECi Cylinder Administration

Airworthiness 

Directive

Going Forward

NTSB

Fran Cox, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate

June 9, 2015
Federal Aviation

Administration

Next Steps

• FAA’s plan is a docket upload with 

supporting documents and meeting results.

• Therefore, let’s review the meeting results.

– By providing new information, we hope to have 

influenced the NTSB’s recommendation.

– Following pages repeat the NTSB’s reasoning and 

the FAA’s comments... what do we conclude?

• Also, the docket upload will be publically

noticed.

– Comment period reopens for 30 days.

– It is another opportunity for the NTSB to comment.

NTSB Meeting

June 9, 2015

For Official Use Only 2
Federal Aviation

Administration

ECi NPRM, history (cont.)

NTSB recommendations.

NTSB Meeting

June 9, 2015

For Official Use Only 3

S/N Range NTSB Reason FAA Comment

1 – 1043 Not investigated, no concerns 

raised.

FAA disagrees:

1) Insufficient head assembly 

interference fit.

2) 2004 AD campaigned limited s/n’s 

having insufficient heat treat.

3) s/n 7708 failed & separated. 

1044 - 7708 Already covered by FAA AD.

7709 – 33696 1) Already covered by ECi

MSB 06-2 50 hr repetitive 

compression & bubble checks for 

cylinders >500 hrs TIS.

2) SAIB already exists.

3) Do repetitive inspections and 

remove at TBO.

FAA disagrees:

1) This population experiences dome 

radius failures <500 hrs TIS.

2) MSB 06-2 applies to only rev D 

castings... none later.

3) SAIB focuses on thin wall exhaust 

valve seat cracks which don’t lead to 

head separations... not mandated.
Federal Aviation

Administration

ECi NPRM, history (cont.)

NTSB recommendations.

NTSB Meeting

June 9, 2015

For Official Use Only 4

S/N Range NTSB Reason FAA Comment

33697 – 36209 Repetitive Inspections and 

remove at TBO.

FAA disagrees:

1) Probability of crack detection and/or 

crack propagation rate reduces 

effectiveness of repetitive inspections.

2) Insufficient head assembly 

interference fit.

36210 – 61176 Apply NTSB safety rec 

(repetitive inspections and 

removal at TBO) from 33697 to 

36209 to the 165 specific serial 

numbers identified by ECi

within this s/n range.

FAA disagrees:

1) Failures are occurring, and are not 

limited to the 165.

2) ECi has yet to make sufficient design 

or manufacturing improvements.

>61176 No airworthiness action 

needed.

FAA agrees.
Federal Aviation

Administration

Next Steps

• Last point, the FAA is exploring having a 

meeting with the GA community to discuss 

the FAA risk analysis, AD, and AMOC 

processes.

– Working with AOPA... timing TBD.

– Also, considering a separate meeting to discuss ECi

cylinders.

NTSB Meeting

June 9, 2015

For Official Use Only 5

Again, thank you for this opportunity to meet.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Juan J. Román, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Triple-S ManagementCorporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2007(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and;2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.        Date:      November 14, 2007 By:  /s/ Juan J. Román    Juan J. Román    *Vice President of Financeand Chief Financial Officer*   
40
----

----

I Comunicaciones

Comisión

----

CATÁLOGO COMÚN DE VARIEDADES DE ESPECIES DE PLANTAS AGRÍCOLAS

Cuarto suplemento a la vigesimotercera edición integral

(2005/C 145 A/01)

SUMARIO

Notas explicativas

Lista de especies de plantas agrícolas

NOTAS EXPLICATIVAS

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

16A.× FESTULOLIUM

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

24.POA NEMORALIS L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

III

55.BRASSICA RAPA L. VAR. SILVESTRIS (LAM.) BRIGGS

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

73.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH

74.SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

75.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH × SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----

(1)DO C 46 A de 22.2.2005, p. 1. Catálogo cuya última modificación la constituye el tercer suplemento (DO C 111 A de 11.5.2005, p. 1).

(2)DO L 193 de 20.7.2002, p. 1. Directiva cuya última modificación la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 1829/2003 del Parlamento Europeo y el Consejo (DO L 268 de 18.10.2003, p. 1).

----
----

Statement on Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 of 2 June 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 as regards the reciprocity mechanism (1)

(2005/C 172/01)

The Council and the Commission stress that the mechanism which is the subject of this Regulation, accompanied where necessary by provisional introduction of the visa requirement for a third country which imposes a visa requirement for nationals from one or more Member States, in no way prevents the application of other provisional measures to such a third country in one or more other fields (particularly political, economic or commercial fields) in accordance with the relevant legal basis or bases in the Treaties if such measures would be deemed an advisable part of the strategy to be implemented to induce the third country to restore visa-free travel for nationals from the Member State or States concerned.

The Council and the Commission consider that, when one or other of the notifications provided for in Articles 1 and 2 of this Regulation occurs, due consideration should be given in the appropriate fora to the advisability of such other measures.

----

(1)OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 3.

----