alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 19 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-178/05)

(2005/C 155/15)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 19 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Dimitrios Triantafillou, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments of the Commission

The Commission submits that the relevant criterion for imposition of duty on the transfer of the registered office or effective centre of management is whether or not the company is classified as a capital company in the State of origin, with the result that duty is not imposed when the Member State of origin does not consider a company to be a capital company. The Commission therefore objects to the fact that the Greek legislation ascribes importance only to whether or not capital duty is imposed in the State of origin, exempting from duty only the transfer to Greece of a registered office or effective centre of management from a Member State which imposes capital duty. The Commission's view is based on a both literal and systemic interpretation of the directive, which is related to the nature as capital companies of the companies liable for duty and is reinforced by the amendment brought about by Directive 85/303/EEC which moves towards abolition of capital duty.

As regards the exemption of agricultural cooperatives and shipping companies, categories covering entire branches of the economy are involved; the Greek authorities have not explained why those categories do not comprise capital companies and their total exemption is not covered by the power under the directive to exempt certain transactions. Furthermore, where the directive intended to exempt whole branches it did so expressly (for example, public undertakings and organisations).

----

(1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1969 (II), p. 412.

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30461 Conference Calendar

BEN ALAN SNIPES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES COOK, Sheriff Ouachita Parish; TURNER, Captain, Warden Ouachita Parish Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-642

-------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Ben Alan Snipes (#532325), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), appeals the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Snipes’ request for consolidation of the instant appeal with No. 98-30737 is DENIED

as moot. Although a pretrial detainee may not be subjected to conditions of confinement that constitute punishment, Hamilton v.No. 99-30461 -2- Lyons , 74 F.3d 99, 103 (5th Cir. 1996)(citing Bell v. Wolfish , 441 U.S. 520, 535 (1979), negligent inaction does not trigger the protections of the Due Process Clause. See Davidson v. Cannon , 474 U.S. 344, 348 (1986). Snipes did not allege or produce evidence that the appellees acted with punitive intent. Snipes’ allegations do not state a constitutional violation. See Davidson , 474 U.S. at 348. Snipes’ allegations that the appellees threatened him do not state a constitutional violation. See Bender v. Brumley , 1 F.3d 271, 274 n.4 (5th Cir. 1993) (pretrial detainee)(allegations of verbal abuse and threats by prison officials do not state a claim under § 1983). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment on alternate grounds. See Bickford v. Int’l Speedway , 654 F.2d 1028, 131 (5th Cir. 1981). Snipes now has five strikes. See Snipes v. Cook , No. 98- 30737 (5th Cir. Sept. 3, 1999); Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996)(affirmance of district court’s dismissal as frivolous counts as a single strike). Except for cases involving an imminent danger of serious physical injury, Snipes is BARRED under § 1915(g) from proceeding further under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. AFFIRMED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR ORDERED; MOTION TO

CONSOLIDATE APPEALS DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28293]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 17, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Brendan S. Murrin, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Alexandra Bosshard, Washington, DC; to both retain and acquire 
additional shares of Bosshard Banco, Ltd., La Crosse, Wisconsin, and 
thereby indirectly retain and acquire additional shares of First 
National Bank of Bangor, Bangor, Wisconsin, and Intercity State Bank, 
Schofield, Wisconsin, as a member of the Bosshard Family Group that 
controls Bosshard Banco, Ltd.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior 
Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Roy Thomas Pitcock, Jr., Graham, Texas; Medora Jacqueline 
Pitcock Eubank, Fort Worth, Texas; the Melissa Pitcock Trust, Graham, 
Texas; and Angela Allison Pitcock Adams, Aledo, Texas (together, the 
Pitcock Family Group); as a group acting in concert to both retain and 
acquire additional shares of Graham Savings Financial Corp., and 
thereby indirectly retain and acquire additional shares of Graham 
Savings and Loan SSB, both in Graham, Texas.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Michael D. Werner, as trustee of the Michael D. Werner Revocable 
Trust, Key West, Florida; and Judith Werner, Waupun, Wisconsin; as a 
group acting in concert to retain voting shares of National Bancshares, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of NBW Bank, both in 
Waupun, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 27, 
2017.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-28293 Filed 12-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2009-0053.                

*Date Filed:*                     February 27, 2009.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     March 20, 2009.                

*Description:*                     Application of Linea Aerea Puertorriquena, Inc. requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing interstate charter                           ( print page 12924)                        air transportation of persons, property and mail.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

 [FR Doc. E9-6604 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-172502on Form S-8 and No. 333-167841,
333-170230 on Form F-3 of our reports dated May 4,  2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of China Gerui Advanced Materials Group Limited (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2011.





/s/ UHY
Vocation HK CPA Limited 
UHY VOCATION HK CPA LIMITED

Certified Public Accountants

Hong Kong, the People’s Republic
of China,

May 4, 2012
----

----

I Communications

Commission

----

RELEVÉ DES DÉCISIONS COMMUNAUTAIRES EN MATIÈRE D'AUTORISATIONS DE MISE SUR LE MARCHÉ DES MÉDICAMENTS DU15.3.2005AU15.4.2005

Décision(s) prise(s) en vertu de l'article 34 de la Directive 2001/83/CE (1) ou de l'article 38 de la Directive 2001/82/CE (2)

(2005/C 118/01)

—   Délivrance, maintien ou modification d'une autorisation nationale de mise sur le marché

----

(1)JO L 311 du 28.11.2001, p. 67.

(2)JO L 311 du 28.11.2001, p. 1.

----

ANNEXE I

LISTE REPRENANT LES NOMS DE FANTAISIE, LES FORMES PHARMACEUTIQUES, LES DOSAGES DES MÉDICAMENTS, LA VOIE D'ADMINISTRATION ET LES TITULAIRES DE L'AUTORISATION DE MISE SUR LE MARCHÉ DANS LES ÉTATS MEMBRES

----

ANNEXE II

LISTE REPRENANT LES NOMS, LES FORMES PHARMACEUTIQUES, LES DOSAGES, LA VOIE D'ADMINISTRATION, LES ESPÈCES ANIMALES ET LES TITULAIRES DE L'AUTORISATION DE MISE SUR LE MARCHÉ DANS LES ÉTATS MEMBRES CONCERNÉS, L'ISLANDE ET LA NORVÈGE

----

ANNEXE III

LISTE REPRENANT LES NOMS, LES FORMES PHARMACEUTIQUES, LES DOSAGES, LES VOIES D'ADMINISTRATION, LE DEMANDEUR, LE TITULAIRE DE L'AUTORISATION DE MISE SUR LE MARCHÉ DES MÉDICAMENTS DANS LES ÉTATS MEMBRES CONCERNÉS

----
EX PARTE Patrick G. WILSON

CR-15-0728

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 7, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Bakken Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), Dan Anderson, Chief Financial Officer and principal executive officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 31, 2016
    By:
    /s/ Dan AndersonChief Financial Officer and principal executive officer


This certification accompanies
each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Claude Edward HOLMES, Jr. and Holmes Funeral Directors, Inc., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Eric DONALDSON, Robert Donaldson and Shanice Donaldson, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5604

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JOSEPH C. PAYNE, 

Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent

______________________

2023-2204

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. PH-3443-21-0363-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee 

required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1) and to file the

required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is 

Case: 23-2204 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 09/18/2023
2 PAYNE V. MSPB

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the 

same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

September 18, 2023

Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 18, 2023

Case: 23-2204 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 09/18/2023
Alphonso JAMES, Sr., Appellant, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1221

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017. Rehearing Denied January 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
James WATKINS v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-15-1286

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly report of Stock Market Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard Smitten, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard Smitten
------------------------
     Richard Smitten
     President, CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
     Accounting Officer

November 7, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Date and Time: 

Thursday, March 19, 2009, 10 a.m. Eastern Time. 

# Place: 

Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 131 “M” Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507. 

# Status: 

The meeting will be closed to the public. 

## Matters To Be Considered 

*Closed Session:*                     Litigation Recommendation: Amicus Curiae Participation.                 

# Note:

                        Any matter not discussed or concluded may be carried over to a later meeting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                     

Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for information. 

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070. 

Dated: March 18, 2009. 

Stephen Llewellyn, 

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

 [FR Doc. E9-6370 Filed 3-19-09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
Paul NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1012

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clayton Ervin, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 547]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J., at hearing; Ronald Zweibel, J., at plea and sentence), rendered November 1, 2002, convicting defendant of burglary in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of eight years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony and statements. In both the photo array and the lineup, all the participants matched the description *317provided by the victim, and there was no readily apparent difference between defendant’s appearance and that of the other persons that would cause him to be singled out for identification (see *People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 833 [1990]). There was nothing unduly suggestive about having the victim view defendant in a lineup after she had already selected his photograph from an array *(People v Cobb,*294 AD2d 199 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 695 [2002]). Finally, there was no evidence that defendant was under the influence of drugs to such a degree that it impaired the voluntariness of his statement *(see People v Williams,*62 NY2d 285 [1984]; *People v Schompert,*19 NY2d 300 [1967], *cert denied*389 US 874 [1967]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 256 

Observing the 29th anniversary of the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in 

Rwanda. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2023 

Mr. KELLY of Mississippi submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Observing the 29th anniversary of the 1994 genocide against 

the Tutsi in Rwanda. 

Whereas the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda has 

been internationally recognized as the massacre of nearly 

1,000,000 Tutsi within a four-month period by the nation’s Hutu-led Government and Hutu neighbors as part 

of a systematic program of genocide; 

Whereas moderate Hutu who were opposed to the Hutu-led 

Government’s genocidal plan were also murdered during 

this time; 

Whereas this atrocity constituted a grave violation of human 

rights and the rule of law, causing untold pain and suffering; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 256 IH 

Whereas the genocide against the Tutsi has left a solemn reminder that the United States and countries around the 

world must work together to protect the vulnerable, uphold human rights, and prevent genocide; 

Whereas on April 7 of each year since 1994 the world has 

commemorated the genocide against the Tutsi to honor 

the memory of the men, women, and children who died 

and to express solidarity with the survivors; and 

Whereas this commemoration not only remembers the victims 

of the genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda but also 

helps to build bridges of understanding between different 

people and fortify the commitment to human rights, protection against persecution and violence, individual liberty, and a free society for all people: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) observes the 29th anniversary of the 1994 

3 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda and remem4 bers the victims and survivors of this tragedy; 

5 (2) recognizes the ongoing efforts of the people 

6 and Government of Rwanda to promote peace, rec7 onciliation, and development, and pledges to con8 tinue its support for these efforts; and 

9 (3) reaffirms its commitment to preventing 

10 genocide and other mass atrocities, and to pro11 moting human rights and democratic values around 

12 the world. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS