alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOHAMMED AL

- QAHTANI , Petitioner , v. JO SEPH R. BIDEN, J r . , et al. , Respondents
. Case No. 05

- CV

- 1971 (PLF)

ORDER Upon consideration of the Petitioner ’ s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Petitioner’s Motion to Compel Examination by a Mixed Medical Commission, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED . Petitioner shall file hi s response by no later than February 19, 202 1
.
SO ORDERED. Dated:

__ January 22, 2021
______ ________ /s/
___________________ HON. PAUL L. FRIEDMAN Senior United States District Judge
Andre AUDIGE and Claudette Audige, Appellants, v. Kevin MOORE, Jacqueline Moore, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Inc., and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Appellees.

No. 4D17-1670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 7, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
X.W., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 454 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 715) to require a background 

check for every firearm sale. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2023 

Mr. THOMPSON of California submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 715) to require 

a background check for every firearm sale. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution, the House shall proceed to the consideration in 

3 the House of the bill (H.R. 715) to require a background 

4 check for every firearm sale. All points of order against 

5 consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be con6 sidered as read. All points of order against provisions in 

7 the bill are waived. The previous question shall be consid8 ered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto 

9 to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 

10 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 454 IH 

1 and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

2 Judiciary or their respective designees; and (2) one motion 

3 to recommit. 

4 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

5 the consideration of H.R. 715. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EX-35.2
(logo) Bank of America


Annual Statement as to Compliance
BOAALT 2006-9

I, H. Randall Chestnut, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 3.18 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated December 28, 2006 (the "Servicing" Agreement), between
Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., as depositor (together with its
permitted successors and assigns, the "Depositor"), Bank of America, N.A. as
servicer (together, with its permitted successors and assigns, the "Servicer"),
and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. as trustee (together with its permitted successors and
assigns, the "Trustee") that: (i) A review has been made under my supervision
for Bank of America, N.A. activities under this Agreement during the 2008
calendar year and, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Bank
of America, N.A. has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement
throughout calendar year 2008.

March 01, 2009


BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as Servicer

By: /s/ H. Randall Chestnut
Name: H. Randall Chestnut
Title: Senior Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0144]


Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the Navy Pier Southeast Safety 
Zone in Chicago Harbor in April 2009. This action is necessary to 
protect vessels and people from the hazards associated with fireworks 
displays. This safety zone will restrict vessel traffic from a portion 
of the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan Zone.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.931 will be enforced from 7:30 
p.m. through 8:30 p.m. on April 4, 2009, and from 7:30 p.m. through 
8:30 p.m. on April 11, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Bannan, Prevention Department, 
Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI, at (414) 747-7154.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the Safety 
Zone, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago Harbor, Chicago, IL, 33 CFR 165.931, 
for the following events:
    (1) Navy Pier Private Party; on April 4, 2009, from 7:30 p.m. 
through 8:30 p.m.
    (2) Navy Pier Private Party; on April 11, 2009, from 7:30 p.m. 
through 8:30 p.m.
    All vessels must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port or 
designated representative to enter, move within, or exit the safety 
zone. Vessels and persons granted permission to enter the safety zone 
shall obey all lawful orders or directions of the Captain of the Port 
or designated representative. While within the safety zone, all vessels 
shall operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.931, Safety 
Zone, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago Harbor, Chicago, IL (72 FR 32520, 
Jun. 13, 2007), and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the 
Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community 
with advance notification of these enforcement periods via broadcast 
Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners.
    The Captain of the Port will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
notifying the public when enforcement of the safety zone established by 
this section is suspended. The Captain of the Port may be contacted via 
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan on channel 16, VHF-FM.

    Dated: March 9, 2009.
Bruce C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. E9-6809 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Keith D. Hall., Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2010

/s/    KEITH D.
HALLKeith D. Hall Chief Executive Officer and Director
Michael C. MOSES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81374

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: May 14, 2019

Annette M. Wallace, Kansas City for appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

In May 2015, Michael Moses pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court of Platte County to the class C felony of stealing, for taking merchandise from a Wal-Mart store that had a value of more than $ 500. The circuit court suspended the imposition of sentence, placed Moses on probation, and ordered that he pay restitution in an amount to be determined by the Department of Probation and Parole. In June 2016, Moses admitted to three probation violations. The circuit court revoked his probation, and sentenced him to three years' incarceration, with an obligation to pay the outstanding balance of the restitution award. Moses filed a motion seeking post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 24.035. The circuit court denied the motion following an evidentiary hearing. Moses appeals. He argues that he was erroneously convicted of, and sentenced for, *felony* stealing, since his offense was only a misdemeanor under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in *State v. Bazell* , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. 2016). Moses also argues that the circuit court lacked an evidentiary basis for ordering him to pay restitution. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Adrian SHAW, Appellant.

No. ED 106019

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: March 5, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Kevin B. Gau, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

Adrian Darcy Shaw ("Defendant") was convicted by jury of statutory sodomy in the first degree. The trial court conducted a hearing, prior to trial, outside the presence of the jury to determine the admissibility of out-of-court statements by a child declarant regarding the alleged sexual offenses. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant alleges the trial court erred in allowing four witnesses to testify at trial to out-of-court statements by the alleged child victim because the time, content and circumstances of the statements did not provide sufficient indicia of reliability as required by statute. We find no error and affirm.

*824An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) Mo.R.Crim. P. (2019).
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of U. S. Natural Nutrients & Minerals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 30, 2011





/s/ Dennis Cullison


Dennis Cullison


Principal Accounting Officer
Henry L. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2569

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Miriam BLANDINO and Fausto Mercedes, Individually and on Behalf of their Minor Children, Jared Mercedes and Yeriannis Mercedes v. Kendra PIERRE, John Doe, Geico Indemnity Company, USAgencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.- Liability and USAgencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.-UM

NO. 2017-C-2093

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
APPLICANT EUGENE DALE ENDERLIN, JR. APPLICATION NO. WR-82,683-01 

### APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ACTION TAKEN REMAND FOREVIDENTIARY HEARING. JUDGE DATE
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Jerome T. Fadden, President and Chief Executive Officer of Platinum
Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and
belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings,
Ltd.


<TABLE>
<S>                                  <C>
Date: May 13, 2003                   By: /s/ JEROME T. FADDEN
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     By: Jerome T. Fadden
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
</TABLE>


                                      -23-
AD SPECS OF FLORIDA, LLC and Michele C. Adams d/b/a Proforma Global Sourcing, Appellants, v. Dena Van WINKLE, Schuyler Van Winkle and Corporate Marketing and Branding, Inc. and Corporate Marketing Solutions, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D16-3411

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

﻿

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

﻿

﻿

We hereby certify that the foregoing Form 10-K/A of Embassy Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2018 complies in all respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

﻿

﻿

﻿

| ﻿ |                                            |   |   |   |   |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| ﻿ |                                            |   |   |   |   |
| ﻿ | /s/ David M. Lobach, Jr.                        |   |
| ﻿ | David M. Lobach, Jr.                            |   |
| ﻿ | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| ﻿ |                                            |   |
| ﻿ |                                            |   |   |   |   |
| ﻿ |                                            |   |   |   |   |
| ﻿ | /s/ Judith A. Hunsicker                         |   |
| ﻿ | Judith A. Hunsicker                             |   |
| ﻿ | First Executive Officer, Chief Operating        |   |
| ﻿ | Officer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer  |   |
| ﻿ |                                            |   |
| ﻿ | DATED: May 6, 2019                              |   |
| ﻿ |                                            |   |   |   |   |

﻿

﻿

----
BF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. OP 20
- 0 5 69 AARON MICHAEL GRAFFT ,

Petitioner, v. STATE OF MONTANA ,

Respondent. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Respondent ’s motion for a 3 0
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted an extension of time to and including February 6 , 2021 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 31 2020

12/31/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0569
# C_2005174EN.01002101.xml

| 14.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/21

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licences pursuant to Article 13(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)

1

(2005/C 174/07)

NORWAY

Operating licenses granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Airwing AS | Postboks 47 |
| NO-2034 Holter |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Decision effective since

Airwing AS

Postboks 47

NO-2034 Holter

9.11.2004

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Notice of Informational Filing

    For informational purposes only, the Federal Railroad 
Administration (FRA) is providing notice that it has received an 
informational filing from BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) to continue 
testing Version II of the railroad's Electronic Train Management System 
(ETMS) submitted pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Sec.  
236.913. The informational filing is described below, including the 
submitting party and the requisite docket number where the 
informational filing and any related information may be found. The 
document is available for public inspection; however, FRA is not 
accepting public comment on the document.

BNSF Railway Company (Docket Number FRA-2006-23687)

    The BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) has submitted an informational 
filing to FRA to extend operational testing of ETMS Version II on to 
its Wichita Falls Subdivision. This continued testing will allow BNSF 
to obtain the necessary information required to amend its currently 
approved Product Safety Plan for ETMS Version I for a future submittal 
to FRA. The informational filing has been placed under Docket Number 
FRA-2006-23687 and is available for public inspection.
    Interested parties are invited to review the informational filing 
and associated documents at the DOT Docket Management facility during 
regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. All documents in the public docket 
are also available for inspection and copying on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written 
communications received into any of our dockets by name of the 
individual submitting the document (or signing the document, if 
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). 
You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal 
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 
19477-78).

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 12, 2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
 [FR Doc. E9-5842 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Harry James ROBINSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3663

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Fabrice M. LEWIS, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents.

WD 81655

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: December 4, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 29, 2019 Application for Transfer Denied June 4, 2019

Fabrice Lewis, Bowling Green, appellate pro se.

Andrew J. Crane, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr. and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam

Fabrice Lewis appeals the judgment on the pleadings in favor of the Missouri Department of Corrections ("DOC"), which denied his request for additional jail-time credit. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying declaratory relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
#### James D. Featherstonhaugh et al., Respondents, v James W. Roemer, Jr., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[719 NYS2d 612]

Crew III, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered June 14, 2000 in Albany County, which denied defendant James W. Roemer, Jr.’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action of the complaint.

When this matter was last before us, the parties were cross-appealing Supreme Court’s denial of cross motions for summary judgment, in which defendant James W. Roemer, Jr. (hereinafter defendant) sought to dismiss the entire complaint and plaintiffs sought judgment on the first and third causes of action (274 AD2d 646, 648). With regard to plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action, we found that there existed genuine issues of fact as to whether, *inter alia,*defendant obtained outside employment and properly reduced the compensation due him in accordance with his employment contract *(id.,*at 648). The matter now comes before us upon Supreme Court’s denial of defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment as to the first cause of action of plaintiffs’ complaint.

Our review of the record and defendant’s additional submissions to Supreme Court does not alter our prior view that material issues of fact exist precluding summary judgment. Specifically, as to defendant’s assertion that plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law and should not be permitted to resort to the equitable remedy of unjust enrichment or constructive trust, we need note only that plaintiffs’ complaint seeks monetary damages for breach of contract and fiduciary misconduct and requests no equitable relief. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be equally without merit.

*784Cardona, P. J., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.