alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 646 

Recognizing the launch of the Redmond Space District in partnership with 

the City of Redmond and OneRedmond, showcasing the growth of 

Redmond’s Space Cluster. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 4, 2023 

Ms. DELBENE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the launch of the Redmond Space District in 

partnership with the City of Redmond and OneRedmond, 

showcasing the growth of Redmond’s Space Cluster. 

Whereas Washington State is a global leader in the space industry; 

Whereas Redmond, Washington, has a rich history of contributions to the space industry starting in 1967, when 

the first space company broke ground on their site in 

Redmond; 

Whereas Redmond is home to a major developer and manufacturer of chemical and electrical propulsion systems 

that has contributed to numerous NASA missions; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 646 IH 

Whereas vital suppliers for the space industry are located in 

Redmond, as well as data management and analysis suppliers; 

Whereas Redmond leverages its strength in information technology, manufacturing, and aerospace to provide an environment for small businesses in this industry to grow; 

Whereas, in the last decade, multiple companies have chosen 

to locate and expand their satellite manufacturing facilities in Redmond; 

Whereas Redmond, as a result, is a global satellite manufacturing hub, manufacturing more satellites than any other 

city in the world; 

Whereas, in March 2023, the City of Redmond issued a proclamation designating the Redmond Space District; and 

Whereas the Redmond Space District creates an ecosystem of 

innovation, technology, knowledge, and human capital for 

the space industry: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the growing space industry in the Redmond Space 

3 District. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Mr. David K. Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Dear Mr. Paylor:

On January 23, 2012, the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental

Quality (VADEQ) provided a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officially

withdrawing portions of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by VADEQ on

April 4, 2008. The submittal pertained to the 1997 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2,5)National

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) attainment plan for the Virginia portion ofthe

Washington DC- MD-VA nonattainment area. VADEQ requested withdrawal ofthe attainment

plan, including analysis ofreasonably available control measures, attainment demonstration,

contingency plans for failure to attain, and mobile source budgets. To address the requirements

of Clean Air Act section 172(c)(3), VADEQ is not requesting withdrawal ofthe portion ofthe

submittal comprised of the 2002 base year emissions inventory.

As requested, EPA is returning the April 4, 2008 submittal, with the exception ofthe

following portions ofthe submittal related to the 2002 base year inventory:

1. Chapter 3 ofthe Attainment Plan (2002 Base Year Inventory)

2. Appendix B (Base Year 2002 Emissions Inventory and Documentation), and

3. The public notice and hearing documents.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call Marilyn Powers, ofmy staff, at (215)

814-2308.

Sincerely,

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division

Enclosure

C) Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumerfiber andprocess chlorinefree.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 194 

Electing Members to the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library and 

the Joint Committee on Printing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2023 

Mr. STEIL (for himself and Mr. MORELLE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Electing Members to the Joint Committee of Congress on 

the Library and the Joint Committee on Printing. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO JOINT COMMITTEE 

3 OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY AND JOINT 

4 COMMITTEE ON PRINTING. 

5 (a) JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LI6 BRARY.—The following Members are hereby elected to the 

7 Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, to serve with 

8 the chair of the Committee on House Administration and 

9 the chair of the Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch 

10 of the Committee on Appropriations: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 194 IH 

1 (1) Mr. Carey. 

2 (2) Mr. Morelle. 

3 (3) Ms. Sewell. 

4 (b) JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING.—The following 

5 Members are hereby elected to the Joint Committee on 

6 Printing, to serve with the chair of the Committee on 

7 House Administration: 

8 (1) Mr. Griffith. 

9 (2) Mr. Murphy. 

10 (3) Mr. Morelle. 

11 (4) Mr. Kilmer. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
STATE of Louisiana v. Jubbard PRICE

State of Louisiana v. Jubbard Price

NO. 2017-K-0520

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 2, 2018

Granted. See Order Attached.

Attachment

**SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA**

**No. 2017-K-0520**

**STATE OF LOUISIANA**

**VERSUS**

**JUBBARD PRICE**

**CONSOLIDATED WITH**

**STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JUBBARD PRICE**

On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review

Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, No. 511-557, Division A;

Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2015-KA-0364 C/W 2015-K-0082.

*1257And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit-"It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

Witness the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on this 2nd day of February, in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand-Seventeen.

John Tarlton Olivier

Clerk of Court

*/s/*

Deputy Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0680 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. REX WILLIAM ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 26 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2024

01/18/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0680
Robert EVANS, Appellant, v. LYKES PASCO, INC., and Sedgwick CMS Tampa, Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D16-5329

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 13, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
NUMBER 13-14-00599-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

AGUA SPECIAL UTILITY

DISTRICT, Appellant,

v.

LEOPOLDO RAMIREZ AND

SYLVIA ANN RAMIREZ, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 

8 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CCD-0104-H. Appellant has filed an 

amended motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds it no longer wishes to pursue the 

appeal. The certificate of conference reflects that appellant was unable to confer with 
2

appellees because appellant does not have a valid phone number or electronic mail 

address or facsimile number for appellees.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. There being no agreement in the motion regarding costs, pursuant to Rule 

42.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all costs are taxed against appellant. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs 

against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion 

for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

19th day of February, 2015.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 11
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 11
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 11
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 11
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 11
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 11
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 11
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 11
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group; Neuroscience of Aging Review Committee; NIA--N.
    Date: February 1-2, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Greg Bissonette, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-402-1622, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#07656e74746869627373626065476a666e6b29696e6f29606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37555e44445859524343525055775a565e5b19595e5f19505841">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 28, 2017.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-28415 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 10, 2022

NO. 03-21-00597-CV

Public Utility Commission of Texas; Peter Lake, Chairman; Will McAdams, 

Commissioner; Lori Cobos, Commissioner; and Jimmy Glotfelty, Commissioner;

each in his or her Official Capacity at the Public Utility Commission of Texas, Appellants

v.

AMA Communications, LLC d/b/a AMA TechTel Communications, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order granting a temporary injunction signed by the trial 

court on November 17, 2021 and from the interlocutory order denying appellants’ plea to the 

jurisdiction and signed by the trial court on November 18, 2021. Having reviewed the record 

and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s

orders. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s interlocutory order granting a temporary 

injunction and interlocutory order denying appellants’ plea to the jurisdiction. Appellants shall 

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENT OF
NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION OF DAMSON BIRTCHER REALTY INCOME FUND - I AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         162,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               388,000
<PP&E>                                      34,082,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,470,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,926,000
<BONDS>                                      2,622,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,922,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,470,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS IS NOT PRESENTED IN LIQUIDATION BASIS OF ACCOUNTING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40915 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JESUS MARTINEZ, also known as Jose Martinez

- Lemus , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18

- CR

- 881

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 19, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40915 Document: 00514878440 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/19/2019No. 18

- 40915

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40915 Document: 00514878440 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/19/2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 558

### CFR Correction

In title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 558, revised as of April 1, 2008, on page 410, in § 558.58 (e)(1)(iii), the entry for Bambermycins 1 to 3, in the column under “Limitations” remove “057926” and in its place add “016592”; in the column under “Sponsors”, add “016592”.

[FR Doc. E9-6810 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Garrett E. MILLER and Kathryn L. Miller, Appellants, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee FOR The CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWMBS, INC., CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2005-30, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-30, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-98

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER







PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Annual Report of Kensington Leasing, Ltd.,  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Angelique de Maison, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  March 25, 2009











Dated:  April 14, 2010



/s/  Angelique de Maison

Angelique de Maison

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          388333
<SECURITIES>                                    256941
<RECEIVABLES>                                 34802011
<ALLOWANCES>                                    212033
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          229503
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (68395)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                38846927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7073805
<OTHER-SE>                                     2049047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  38846927
<SALES>                                        3549926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3598483
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1388848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 13000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1387434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 809201
<INCOME-TAX>                                    280000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             529201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    529201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
## NUMBER 13
- 10 - 00 387 - CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ALE ANDRE, LLC, FERNANDO SOLLOA, RICARDO BACKAL, PABLO KURI FERNANDEZ AND OSCAR ESQUIVEL GARZA , A ppellants ,

v. SAN ANTONIO NATIONAL BANK , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellants, Ale Andre, LLC, Fernando Solloa, Ricardo Backal, Pablo Kuri Fernandez, and Oscar Esquivel Garza , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by
the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number2

CL

- 09

- 3668

- D(1)

. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that t he parties have reached a settlement of the claims and causes of action
between them. Appellants request tha t this Court dismiss the appeal with prejudice to the refiling of same. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the unopposed moti on to dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellant s

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIA M
Delivered and filed the 2nd day of February , 201 2

.
Ava Electris CANNIE aka Eva Helene Cannie, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4419

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 17-PDB-061

NO. 2017-OB-2066

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Leave to appeal denied.
James Calvin FRAZIER v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-15-1145

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 12, 2016 Reh. denied December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reversed and remanded.