alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

      ( print page 12143)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change for the meeting of the Services Subcommittee of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC), March 26, 2009, 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Time at the Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Conference Room 335G2, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, 20201which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 9, 2009, 74FR10060.                 

                    The Webinar Link for Registration and Access Information that was listed in the notice has been changed. The correct Webinar link is                     *https://www1.gotomeeting.com/​register/​892570174.*                     To access the conference call the Dial-in number is 888-455-2920 and the Access code is 3857872. The time remains the same.                 

Dated: March 16, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-6202 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Julio QUINTANA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 27, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Torrey Dewayne WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Radiant Logistics, Inc.
      (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
      with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





DATE:
      November 14, 2006





BY: /s/
      Bohn
      H. Crain


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer




This
      certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It
      is
      not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Radiant Logistics, Inc and will be retained by Radiant Logistics, Inc and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,206]


Millinocket Fabrication and Machine Inc., Millinocket, ME; Notice 
of Termination of Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in 
response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers 
of Millinocket Fabrication and Machine Inc., Millinocket, Maine.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6297 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit  32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Mason Hill Holdings, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for the year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Geoffrey  Eiten,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Mason
Hill  Holdings,  Inc.,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)      the  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April  7,  2004

                                      /s/Geoffrey  Eiten
                                      Chief  Executive  Officer

                                      Geoffrey  Eiten
                                      Chief  Financial  Officer
SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs


PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS


www.sealebeers.com

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-K of Ya Zhu Silk, Inc. (A Development Stage Company), of our report dated November 24, 2010 on our audit of the financial statements of Ya Zhu Silk, Inc. as of August 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from inception on July 22, 2008 through August 31, 2010, and the reference to us under the caption “Experts.”




















/s/Seale and Beers, CPAs





Seale and Beers, CPAs


Las Vegas, Nevada


November 29, 2010































Seale and Beers, CPAs PCAOB & CPAB Registered Auditors






50 S. Jones Blvd Suite 202 Las Vegas, NV 89107 Phone: (888)727-8251 Fax: (888)782-2351
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ANTONIO D. WASHINGTON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-30255 

D.C. No. 3:15-cr-00104-SLG-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Antonio D. Washington appeals pro se from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Washington contends that the district court abused its discretion by ignoring 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-30255 

the severity of his medical issues and the conditions at his prison, as well as by

concluding that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors weighed against relief. 

The district court concluded that, despite Washington’s commendable efforts at 

rehabilitation, relief was unwarranted in light of the § 3553(a) factors, including 

Washington’s extensive and violent criminal history and the fact that Washington 

had served less than half of his sentence. This was not an abuse of discretion. See 

United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of

review); United States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district 

court abuses its discretion only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or not 

supported by the record). Accordingly, we do not reach Washington’s argument 

that the district court erred in its analysis of whether he had shown extraordinary 

and compelling reasons for relief. See Keller, 2 F.4th at 1284 (a district court may 

deny compassionate release based on the § 3553(a) factors alone). 

To the extent Washington seeks to introduce new evidence regarding his 

medical conditions, we do not consider that evidence because it was not presented 

to the district court. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**JULIE TRYBOSKI,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 137 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
Exhibit
      31.1





CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHAIRMAN AND CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT




**CERTIFICATIONS**




I,
      Charles A. Fust, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SinoFresh HealthCare,
      Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      Omitted in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8760;




c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
      quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information;




b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




November
      19, 2007




/s/
                Charles A. FustCharles
                A. FustChairman
                of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and
                Chief Financial
                Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,539]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a State Workforce officer on behalf of all workers at Lexis Nexis, San Francisco, California.

The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6544 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

KEVIN DARNELL MILES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30004

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00008-WFN-28

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Wm. Fremming Nielsen, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 5, 2016** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and GOULD, Circuit Judges and BURNS,*** District

Judge.

 

Kevin Miles challenges the 144-month sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea convictions for conspiring to distribute oxycodone-based pills in

FILED

FEB 12 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Larry A. Burns, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Miles’ appeal is barred by the waiver of appeal provision in his plea

agreement. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623–24 (9th Cir. 2007). The

illegal sentence exception does not apply because Miles’ due process contention

lacks merit. His argument that the district court violated his rights under Apprendi

v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151

(2013), fails because the district court’s drug quantity findings didn’t affect the

statutory maximum sentence nor subject him to a mandatory minimum sentence. 

See United States v. Vallejos, 742 F.3d 902, 906–07 (9th Cir. 2014).

DISMISSED.
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of TierOne Corporation
(Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               September 30, 2007 (Report) fully complies with the
requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |                             
|----------------------- | ----------------------------
|Date:  November 5, 2007 | By:  /s/ Eugene B. Witkowicz
|                        | Eugene B. Witkowicz         
|                        | Executive Vice President    
|                        | and Chief Financial Officer
Dennis L. VARGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80894

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: October 30, 2018

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Vargas appeals the denial, after evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He complains on appeal that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object and request a mistrial during voir dire when a venireperson made remarks about Vargas being in jail before. He also claims his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to point out errors in his sentencing assessment report. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy (DoN) announces the availability of the inventions listed below, assigned to the United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, for domestic and foreign licensing by the Department of the Navy.

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed to Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, Email                         *Christopher.Monsey@navy.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following patents are available for licensing: Patent No. 9,826,793 (Navy Case No. 101446): MASK COUPLING APPARATUS.

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: December 21, 2017.

E.K. Baldini,

Federal Register Liaison Officer, Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy.

[FR Doc. 2017-28305 Filed 12-29-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Alonzo MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### Peter Frank, Appellant, v Beck Wainwright Holding Corp., Respondent.

[720 NYS2d 163]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered October 6, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgement dismissing the complaint, (2), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated January 10, 2000, as, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination, and (3) from an order of the same court, dated January 25, 2000, which, *sua sponte,*resettled the order dated January 10, 2000.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from the order dated January 25, 2000, is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted *(see,*CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated October 6, 1999, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated January 10, 2000, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 10, 2000, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated January 25, 2000; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated January 25, 2000, is affirmed; and it is further,

*607Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. It was unforeseeable that the plaintiff, while at the defendant’s premises to conduct business as the defendant’s accountant, would take it upon himself to climb a ladder from which he would then fall and sustain an injury *(see, Basso v Miller,*40 NY2d 233; *Johnson v Summa,*230 AD2d 633). Moreover, the plaintiff failed to satisfy the required elements of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur *(see, Finocchio v Crest Hollow Club,*184 AD2d 491; *DeSimone v Inserra Supermarkets,*207 AD2d 615). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish the existence of a triable issue of fact (see, *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.