80 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

participation rate since the time period 

was extended in 2015, and the Board’s 

desire to quickly open up opportunities 

for handlers, the Board preferred to 

expand the opportunity for diversion 

credits for these projects. Therefore, the 

alternatives were rejected. 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), the Order’s information 

collection requirements have been 

previously approved and assigned OMB 

No. 0581–0177, Tart Cherries Grown in 

the States of Michigan, New York, 

Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, 

Washington, and Wisconsin. No 

changes in those requirements are 

necessary as a result of this action. 

Should any changes become necessary, 

they would be submitted to OMB for 

approval. 

This proposed rule would not impose 

any additional reporting or 

recordkeeping requirements on either 

small or large tart cherry handlers. As 

with all Federal marketing order 

programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce 

information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. 

AMS is committed to complying with 

the E-Government Act, to promote the 

use of the internet and other 

information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

In addition, USDA has not identified 

any relevant Federal rules that 

duplicate, overlap or conflict with this 

rule. 

The Board’s meeting was widely 

publicized throughout the tart cherry 

industry, and all interested persons 

were invited to attend the meeting and 

participate in Board deliberations. Like 

all Board meetings, the May 3, 2017, 

meeting was a public meeting, and all 

entities, both large and small, were able 

to express their views on this issue. 

Finally, interested persons are invited 

to submit comments on this proposed 

rule, including the regulatory and 

informational impacts of this action on 

small businesses. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ 

rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. 

Any questions about the compliance 

guide should be sent to Richard Lower 

at the previously mentioned address in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section. 

A 30-day comment period is provided 

to allow interested persons to respond 

to this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930 

Marketing agreements, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Tart 

cherries. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 930 is proposed to 

be amended as follows: 

PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN 

IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW 

YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON, 

UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND 

WISCONSIN 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 930 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A] 

■ 2. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Order 

Regulating Handling’’ as ‘‘Subpart A— 

Order Regulating Handling’’. 

[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B 

and Amended] 

■ 3. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Rules and 

Regulations’’ as subpart B and revise the 

heading to read as follows: 

Subpart B—Administrative 

Requirements 

[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C] 

■ 4. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Assessment 

Rate’’ as ‘‘Subpart C—Assessment Rate’’. 

■ 5. In § 930.162: 

■ a. Revising the sentences at the end of 

(b)(1) and (b)(2); 

■ b. Add new paragraph (c)(3); 

■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(3),(4) 

and (5) as (c)(4),(5) and (6); and 

■ d. Add new paragraph (h). 

The revisions to read as follows: 

§ 930.162 Exemptions. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(1) * * * In addition, the maximum 

duration of any credit activity is five 

years from the date of the first shipment. 

(2) * * * In addition, shipments of 

tart cherries or tart cherry products in 

new market development and market 

expansion outlets are eligible for 

handler diversion credit for a period of 

five years from the handler’s date of the 

first shipment into such outlets. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(3) When applying to the Board for an 

exemption for the use of domestic tart 

cherry products in markets not currently 

served by the domestic industry, 

handlers may provide a verifiable 

statement from the buyer of its intent to 

use domestic tart cherry products to the 

Board staff for review in lieu of review 

by the subcommittee as detailed in (d) 

of this section. A verifiable statement is 

defined as a written statement from the 

buyer that it will use domestic tart 

cherries in products or markets not 

currently supplied by domestic sources, 

which will be reviewed and 

documented by Board staff. 

* * * * * 

(h) Extensions and Transfers If no 

shipments are made within the first year 

of any approved exemption project from 

the date of approval, new applications 

for a similar project (same market or 

product) are eligible for approval; 

provided that, handlers with an 

approved exemption project have the 

opportunity to apply to the 

subcommittee for a six month extension 

of this time period. 

For projects granted extensions, if no 

shipment is made prior to the end of the 

extension period, new applications for 

the same market or project are eligible 

for approval. 

* * * * * 

Dated: December 26, 2017. 

Bruce Summers, 

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2017–28167 Filed 12–29–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2017–1176; Product 

Identifier 2017–NM–123–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 747–8 

series airplanes. This proposed AD was 

prompted by a report of restricted 

movement of the right brake pedals after 

landing rollout. This proposed AD 

would require revising the airplane 

flight manual (AFM) by adding an 

autobrake system limitation. This 

proposed AD would also require 

modifying intercostal webs near a main 

entry door, which would terminate the 

AFM limitation. We are proposing this 

AD to address the unsafe condition on 

these products. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by February 16, 2018. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules 81 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 

Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster 

Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 

90740–5600; telephone 562–797–1717; 

internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this service information at the FAA, 

Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

It is also available on the internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching 

for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017– 

1176. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2017– 

1176; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this NPRM, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Office (phone: 800–647– 

5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. 

Comments will be available in the AD 

docket shortly after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kelly McGuckin, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Section, Seattle 

ACO Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW, Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 

425–917–6490; fax: 425–917–6590; 

email: Kelly.McGuckin@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposal. Send your comments to 

an address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 

2017–1176; Product Identifier 2017– 

NM–123–AD’’ at the beginning of your 

comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this NPRM. We will consider 

all comments received by the closing 

date and may amend this NPRM 

because of those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this NPRM. 

Discussion 

We have received a report of 

restricted movement of the right brake 

pedals after landing rollout after the 

flight crew disengaged the autobrakes 

using manual brake inputs. An 

investigation determined that the inservice event had occurred because ice 

had formed during the flight on the right 

brake control cable pulleys near door 3R 

due to inadequate routing and drainage 

of water. The left brake control system 

is also vulnerable to ice accumulation 

because the door 3L and door 3R 

designs are similar. We are proposing 

this AD to prevent restricted motion of 

the brake pedals, which could affect 

stopping performance and directional 

control of the airplane. This restricted 

motion could lead to high speed runway 

excursion or lateral runway excursion. 

Related Service Information Under 1 

CFR Part 51 

We reviewed Boeing Alert 

Requirements Bulletin 747–32A2525 

RB, dated September 6, 2017. This 

service information describes 

procedures for modifying intercostal 

webs near main entry door 3 by drilling 

two drain holes in the station-18 

intercostal web at door stop 8 and 

applying sealant at the fore-aft drain 

path of the upper main sill web at 

station 16 near door 3R and door 3L. 

This service information is reasonably 

available because the interested parties 

have access to it through their normal 

course of business or by the means 

identified in the ADDRESSES section. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

This proposed AD would require 

revising the AFM to incorporate an 

autobrake system limitation. This 

proposed AD would also require 

accomplishment of the actions 

identified in the Boeing Alert 

Requirements Bulletin 747–32A2525 

RB, dated September 6, 2017, except as 

discussed under Differences Between 

this Proposed AD and the Service 

Information,’’ and except for any 

differences identified as exceptions in 

the regulatory text of this proposed AD. 

Accomplishing the actions specified 

in the service information described 

previously would be terminating action 

for the AFM autobrake system 

limitation. For information on the 

procedures and compliance times for 

Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 

747–32A2525 RB, dated September 6, 

2017, see this service information at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching 

for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017– 

1176. 

Difference Between This Proposed AD 

and the Service Information 

Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 

747–32A2525 RB, dated September 6, 

2017, is applicable to ‘‘Model 747–8 

series airplanes having line numbers 

1434 through 1539 inclusive.’’ However, 

this proposed AD would exclude 

airplanes having line numbers 1443, 

1451, 1453, 1456, 1470, 1472, 1475, 

1477, 1480, 1492, 1494, 1497, 1498, 

1500, 1503, 1511, 1512, 1513, and 1514, 

because those airplanes were previously 

modified to address the identified 

unsafe condition. 

Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 

747–32A2525 RB, dated September 6, 

2017, does not specify the type of 

sealant that must be used. However, this 

AD specifies using BMS 5–142, TYPE 2; 

BMS 5–95; PR–1826; or PR–1828 

sealant. 

We have coordinated these 

differences with Boeing. 

Explanation of ‘‘RB’’ (Requirements 

Bulletin) 

The FAA worked in conjunction with 

industry, under the Airworthiness 

Directive Implementation Aviation 

Rulemaking Committee (AD ARC), to 

enhance the AD system. One 

enhancement is a process for annotating 

which steps in the service information 

are ‘‘required for compliance’’ (RC) with 

an AD. Boeing has implemented this RC 

concept into Boeing service bulletins. 

In an effort to further improve the 

quality of ADs and AD-related Boeing 

service information, a joint process 

improvement initiative was worked 

between the FAA and Boeing. The 

initiative resulted in the development of 

a new process in which the service 

information more clearly identifies the 

actions needed to address the unsafe 

condition in the ‘‘Accomplishment 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
82 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

Instructions.’’ The new process results 

in a Boeing Requirements Bulletin, 

which contains only the actions needed 

to address the unsafe condition (i.e., 

only the RC actions). 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 2 airplanes of U.S. registry. We 

estimate the following costs to comply 

with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

AFM revision ................................................... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ................. $0 $85 $170 

Modification ..................................................... 10 work-hours × $85 per hour = $850 ........... (1) 850 1,700 

1We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide parts cost estimates for the modification specified in this proposed AD. 

According to the manufacturer, some 

of the costs of this proposed AD may be 

covered under warranty, thereby 

reducing the cost impact on affected 

individuals. We do not control warranty 

coverage for affected individuals. As a 

result, we have included all available 

costs in our cost estimate. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

This proposed AD is issued in 

accordance with authority delegated by 

the Executive Director, Aircraft 

Certification Service, as authorized by 

FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance 

with that order, issuance of ADs is 

normally a function of the Compliance 

and Airworthiness Division, but during 

this transition period, the Executive 

Director has delegated the authority to 

issue ADs applicable to transport 

category airplanes to the Director of the 

System Oversight Division. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2017–1176; Product Identifier 2017– 

NM–123–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by February 

16, 2018. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 747–8 series airplanes, certificated in 

any category, as identified in Boeing Alert 

Requirements Bulletin 747–32A2525 RB, 

dated September 6, 2017, except for airplanes 

having line numbers 1443, 1451, 1453, 1456, 

1470, 1472, 1475, 1477, 1480, 1492, 1494, 

1497, 1498, 1500, 1503, 1511, 1512, 1513, 

and 1514. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 32, Landing gear. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report of 

restricted movement of the brake pedals after 

landing rollout. We are issuing this AD to 

prevent restricted motion of the brake pedals, 

which can affect stopping performance and 

directional control of the airplane. This 

restricted motion can lead to high speed 

runway excursion or lateral runway 

excursion. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Required Actions 

Within 120 days after the effective date of 

this AD: Revise the airplane flight manual 

(AFM) by incorporating the limitation 

specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this 

AD. 

FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (g) OF THIS

AD—AUTOBRAKE LIMITATION

Autobrakes (Required by AD ***-**-**) 

Takeoff is prohibited without an operative 

autobrake system. 

The autobrake system must be used for 

landing, unless EICAS messages 

AUTOBRAKES or ANTISKID are displayed. 

The autobrake system may be disengaged 

after slowing to a safe taxi speed or to a 

full stop, and only by use of the brake 

pedals. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules 83 

(h) Terminating Action for AFM Limitation 

Within 60 months after the effective date 

of this AD, do all applicable actions 

identified in, and in accordance with, the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 

Requirements Bulletin 747–32A2525 RB, 

dated September 6, 2017, except where the 

requirements bulletin specifies applying 

sealant, the following type of sealant must be 

used: BMS 5–142, TYPE 2; BMS 5–95; PR– 

1826; or PR–1828. Doing the actions 

specified in this paragraph terminates the 

AFM limitation required by paragraph (g) of 

this AD. The AFM limitation required by 

paragraph (g) of this AD may be removed 

from the AFM after accomplishing the 

actions specified in this paragraph. 

Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD: 

Guidance for accomplishing the actions 

required by paragraph (h) of this AD can be 

found in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747– 

32A2525, dated September 6, 2017, which is 

referred to in Boeing Alert Requirements 

Bulletin 747–32A2525 RB, dated September 

6, 2017. 

(i) Special Flight Permit 

Special flight permits, as described in 

Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 

and 21.199), are not allowed, except as 

provided by paragraph (j) of this AD. 

(j) Ferry Flight Limitations 

Operators who are prohibited from further 

flight due to the autobrake system being 

inoperative may perform a one-time nonrevenue ferry flight to fly the airplane to a 

maintenance facility to either fix the 

autobrake system or incorporate the 

terminating action specified in paragraph (h) 

of this AD. This ferry flight must be 

performed without passengers, and with 

interior modifications to allow heated cabin 

air to warm the brake control cables and 

pulleys in the vicinity of door 3L and door 

3R. These interior modifications must 

include, at a minimum, temporarily 

removing the side panels and insulation 

immediately aft of door 3L and door 3R. 

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 

14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 

principal inspector or local Flight Standards 

District Office, as appropriate. If sending 

information directly to the manager of the 

certification office, send it to the attention of 

the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of 

this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9- 

ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair, 

modification, or alteration required by this 

AD if it is approved by the Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO 

Branch, to make those findings. To be 

approved, the repair method, modification 

deviation, or alteration deviation must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(l) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Kelly McGuckin, Aerospace 

Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, 

Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW, Renton, WA 98057 3356; phone: 425– 

917–6490; fax: 425–917–6590; email: 

Kelly.McGuckin@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 

Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., 

MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; 

telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, Transport 

Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

December 14, 2017. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2017–28151 Filed 12–29–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2017–1175; Product 

Identifier 2017–NM–087–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc., Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all 

Bombardier, Inc., Model CL–600–2C10 

(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) 

airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 

(Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, 

Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet 

Series 900) airplanes, and Model CL– 

600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) 

airplanes. This proposed AD was 

prompted by a report that Belleville 

washers installed on the shimmy 

damper of the main landing gear may 

fail due to fatigue. This proposed AD 

would require revising the maintenance 

or inspection program, as applicable, to 

incorporate a repetitive task specified in 

the maintenance review board report. 

We are proposing this AD to address the 

unsafe condition on these products. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by February 16, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this NPRM, contact Bombardier, Inc., 

400 Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval, 

Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody 

Customer Response Center North 

America toll-free telephone 1–866–538– 

1247 or direct-dial telephone 1–514– 

855–2999; fax 514–855–7401; email 

ac.yul@aero.bombardier.com; internet 

http://www.bombardier.com. You may 

view this service information at the 

FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2017– 

1175; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this NPRM, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Operations office (telephone 

800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES

section. Comments will be available in 

the AD docket shortly after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe and Mechanical Systems 

Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 

1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, 

Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516– 

228–7318; fax 516–794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposal. Send your comments to 

an address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS