alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 5/27/21 P. v. Sandoval CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SEBASTIAN ESTEBAN SA NDOVAL,

Defendant and Appellant. H048640

(Santa Clara County

Super. Ct. No. C2009969)

In July 2020, d efendant Sebastian Esteban Sandoval was charged by felony

complaint with two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code, § 29800,

subd. (a)(1)) and one count of misdemeanor resi sting an officer ( Pen. Code, § 148,

subd. (a)(1)). The record contains no indication of the facts of his offenses because he

waived preliminary examination, and the probation report was a waive d referral.

Defendant entered no contest pleas to all three counts in response to an indicated

sentence of 16 months to resolve both this case and his pending probation violation case

.

The court imposed a 16

- month term for one of the firearm counts, a co ncurrent term for

the other firearm count, and a concurrent 90

- day term (which was deemed served) for the

resisting count. The court ordered that a $300 restitution fund fine be “ impose [d]” and

“ stay [ed]” “until it’s demonstrated you have the ability to pay

. ” I t ordered that a

$300 parole revocation fine be “impose[d] and suspend[ed].” The court “waive[d] all of

the remaining fines and fees.” T he abstract of judgment did not note the stay o f the

restitu tion fund fine. Defendant timely filed a notice of appeal from the judgment.2

Appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief that states the case and the

facts but raises no issues. Defendant was notified of his right to submit written argument

o n his own behalf but has failed to avail himself of the opportunity. Pursuant to People v.

Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that

there are no arguable issues on appeal. However, we note the clerical error in the abstract

and direct the trial court to correct it.

DIS POSITION

The judgment is affirmed and the trial court is directed to correct the abstract of

judgment so that it notes the stay of the $300 restitution fund fine

._______________________________

ELIA, ACTING P. J.

WE CONCUR:

_____________________________

BAMATTRE

- MANOUKIAN , J.

_____________________________

DANNER , J.

People v

. Sandoval

H0 48640
#### William C. SHERMAN, Katherine M. Sherman, and Wellmore B. Turner, Executors of the Estate of John Q. Sherman, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 47.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 29, 1942.

Allen & Allen and Marston Allen, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Cooper, Kerr & Dun-ham, of New York City (Marston Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, Thomas J. Byrne, of New York City, and Jos. W. Hatfield, of Dayton, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

James W. Schmied, of New York City (Russell C. Terry, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment, 38 F.Supp. 360, affirmed on opinion below.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-20010

Summary Calendar

_____________________

ANTHONY EUGENE GILL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-3109)

_________________________________________________________________

September 16, 1998 

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Eugene Gill, Texas prisoner # 647051, is BARRED from

proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation

Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because, on at least three

prior occasions while incarcerated, Gill has brought an action or

appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed as

frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief could

be granted. See Gill v. Thornton, No. 96-11478 (5th Cir. June 17,

1997) (unpublished; appeal dismissed as frivolous in case dismissed
- 2 -

by district court as frivolous); Gill v. Texas Dep’t of Criminal

Justice, No. 95-20723 (5th Cir. Jan. 23, 1996) (unpublished;

affirming district court’s dismissal of § 1983 action as

frivolous); see also Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th

Cir. 1996) (dismissal of appeal as frivolous in case dismissed by

district court as frivolous counts as two strikes; affirmance of

district court’s dismissal as frivolous counts as one strike).

Accordingly, Gill’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he may not

proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is in

prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED.

Gill has 30 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full

appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court,

should he wish to reinstate his appeal.

IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED
EX PARTE David KYLE

CR-15-1483

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Etowah Cir. Ct.
Amendment 2007-1 to the Wachovia Corporation Savings Restoration Plan



 Exhibit 10(b) 
 AMENDMENT 2007-1 
 TO THE WACHOVIA CORPORATION SAVINGS RESTORATION PLAN 
 (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED ON JANUARY 1, 2002) 
 WHEREAS, Wachovia Corporation (the “Corporation”) maintains the Wachovia Corporation Savings Restoration Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, Section 10.3 of the Plan reserves the right of the Management Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. 
 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a new Section 11 be added to the Plan,
effective December 31, 2007 to read as follows: 
 Section 11 Freezing the Plan 
  

	 	11.1	Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, effective December 31, 2007, no Employee may first become a Participant in the Plan after December 31,
2007. 

  

	 	11.2	Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, effective December 31, 2007, no Participant may elect to defer Compensation to the Plan and no deferred amounts
will be credited to a Participant’s Deferral Account under Section 4.1(a) of the Plan for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. 

  


	 	11.3	Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, effective December 31, 2007, the Company will not credit a Participant’s Deferral Account with
contributions (including Company Matching Contributions) for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2008; provided that, each Participant’s Deferral Sub-Accounts will continue to be credited or debited to reflect any gains or losses
as if the Deferral Sub-Accounts had been invested in the Investment Indexes pursuant to the allocation elections made by the Participant, as provided in Section 5. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized to make such further amendments to
the Plan to meet the requirements of this Amendment 2007-1 as set forth herein and to facilitate Plan administration in light of this Amendment 2007-1.  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WACHOVIA CORPORATION has caused this Plan Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly-authorized officer on this 19th day of December, 2007. 
  

			
	 WACHOVIA CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Shannon W. McFayden

	 Its:
	 	Senior Executive Vice President and Director of Human Resources and Corporate Relations
Back to the homepage of Jonathan Oppenheim

Sunday Times Retraction 

 Original article 

 Lewis Complaint 

 Copy of Retraction 

Text of Retraction 

The article "UN climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim" (News, Jan 31) stated that the 2007 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report had included an "unsubstantiated claim" that 

up to 40% of the Amazon rainforest could be sensitive to future changes in rainfall. The IPCC had 

referenced the claim to a report prepared for the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) by Andrew Rowell and 

Peter Moore, whom the article described as "green campaigners" with "little scientific expertise." The 

article also stated that the authors’ research had been based on a scientific paper that dealt with the 

impact of human activity rather than climate change. 

In fact, the IPCC’s Amazon statement is supported by peer-reviewed scientific evidence. In the case of 

the WWF report, the figure had, in error, not been referenced, but was based on research by the 

respected Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM) which did relate to the impact of climate 

change. We also understand and accept that Mr Rowell is an experienced environmental journalist and 

that Dr Moore is an expert in forest management, and apologise for any suggestion to the contrary. 

The article also quoted criticism of the IPCC’s use of the WWF report by Dr Simon Lewis, a Royal 

Society research fellow at the University of Leeds and leading specialist in tropical forest ecology. We 

accept that, in his quoted remarks, Dr Lewis was making the general point that both the IPCC and WWF 

should have cited the appropriate peer-reviewed scientific research literature. As he made clear to us at 

the time, including by sending us some of the research literature, Dr Lewis does not dispute the 

scientific basis for both the IPCC and the WWF reports’ statements on the potential vulnerability of the 

Amazon rainforest to droughts caused by climate change. 

In addition, the article stated that Dr Lewis’ concern at the IPCC’s use of reports by environmental 

campaign groups related to the prospect of those reports being biased in their conclusions. We accept 

that Dr Lewis holds no such view – rather, he was concerned that the use of non-peer-reviewed sources 

risks creating the perception of bias and unnecessary controversy, which is unhelpful in advancing the 

public’s understanding of the science of climate change. A version of our article that had been checked 

with Dr Lewis underwent significant late editing and so did not give a fair or accurate account of his 

views on these points. We apologise for this. 

Sunday Times Retraction Page 1 of 1

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/jono/pub/cc/pcc-st/ 7/23/2010
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ A. Leon Blaser A. Leon Blaser, Chief Executive Officer  Date: June 20, 2006    {A0032848.DOC}
SB-2










Exhibit 10.5  



Loan Agreement 



Signed in Lod on
December, 31st 2006  



	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Between: 	Future IT Ltd. - Private Company 51-3556027 	  
	  	(Hereinafter: the Company) 
	  	  	of the one part 
	  
	and 	DataSafe Group Ltd. - Private Company 513865279 
	  	(Hereinafter: the Lender) 
	  	  	of the other part 






	As  	the
Company asked for a loan with the conditions specified in this agreement;






	And as  	
      the Lender is prepared to lend to the Company the loan amount hereinafter with the
             conditions specified in this agreement;






Therefore, the parties
agreed as follows:  



	1.  	The
above introduction constitutes an integral part of the agreement.






	2.  	The
Lender undertakes to give the Company a loan in the amount of $650,000 (six hundred fifty
       thousand US dollars) (hereinafter: the Loan). The loan will be given on December
31st 2006, or        upon signing the agreement.






	3.  	Loan
payback period: not later than 54 months from the date of signing the loan agreement.






	4, 	The
loan payback will be paid to the Lender US Dollar-linked according to the Bank of Israel
representative rate (hereinafter: US Dollar) on the due date of each repayment of the
loan. 






	5.  	During
the 18 months starting on January, 31st 2007, the Company will pay interest payments in
       LIBOR rate + 1.75% per annum.






	6.  	Starting
from July, 31st 2008 (the 19th month) and during 36 months, the Company will pay each
       month capital repayments in the same amount of 18,055 dollar each payment. In
addition to the        capital payment, there will be interest on the non-cleared
collectible balance.

















	7.  	The
loan will have interest that is identical to the interest paid by the Company for a loan
       received from Israel Discount Bank Ltd. (hereinafter: the Bank) for the amount of
$500,000,        according to the loan agreement dated December, 20th 2006 and the loan
agreement instructions        between the Company and the Bank regarding the binding
interest and the loan payment will apply        on the Company and will be paid by it to
the Lender on the date of the loan payment.






	8.  	Any
change in the conditions of this agreement will only bind the parties if it is drawn in
       writing and signed by both parties.






	9.  	Any
notification delivered to the parties according to the addresses above, will be regarded
as        if it has been delivered in reply within 3 days from its delivery date by
registered post.        Email or fax messages will be binding subject to receiving
acknowledgement for delivering the        notification to the addressee.








In witness whereof the
parties hereunto set their hands: 



		
		
		
	FutureIT Inc 	DataSafe Group Ltd. 
	The Company	The Lender
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11371-11372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM01-5-000]


Electronic Tariff Filings; Notice of Technical Conference 
Regarding Electronic Tariff Filing

March 10, 2009.
    Take notice that on April 28, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon, a 
technical conference will be held to discuss the implementation of 
electronic tariff filing. In Order No. 714,\1\ the Commission adopted 
regulations requiring that, as of April 1, 2010, tariff and tariff 
related filings must be made electronically. The first technical 
conference was held on December 3, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Electronic Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, 73 FR 57,515 (Oct. 
3, 2008), 124 FERC ] 61,270, FERC Stats. & Regs [Regulations 
Preambles] ] 31,276 (2008) (Sept. 19, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This conference will cover: the data fields and formatting to be 
included in the Table of Contents on the Commission's public viewer; 
issues that have arisen with respect to the testing site, including the 
need for dates or versioning in the comma separated value files and the 
error codes and descriptions; and a discussion of the means by which 
companies may, if they choose, include pending compliance tariff 
provisions in their baseline filings. Time permitting, participants 
also will be free to ask questions about other issues related to 
electronic tariff filing.
    Background material on the standards and requirements can be found 
on the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov; click on eTariff 
under the Documents and Filings Heading).
    The technical conference is open to the public. The conference will 
be held at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426. In addition, the conference will be 
accessible via telephone. Staff anticipates posting any documents that 
may be referenced during the conference on the eTariff Web site so that 
they will be accessible to those using the telephone.
    The telephone number for the conference will be posted on http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/etariff.asp and an RSS alert of the posting 
will be

[[Page 11372]]

issued. No preregistration is needed to access the conference by 
telephone.
    For more information, contact Keith Pierce, Office of Energy Market 
Regulation at (202) 502-8525 or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6f3e2d7c4dfd0d0f6d0d3c4d598d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0b5a49182999696b096958293de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5683 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 387 

Expressing support for the designation of June 10, 2023, as ‘‘Veterans 

Get Outside Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2023 

Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana (for himself and Mr. MOULTON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of June 10, 2023, 

as ‘‘Veterans Get Outside Day’’. 

Whereas, between 2000 and 2022, the Department of Defense found that more than 460,000 members of the 

Armed Forces were diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries; 

Whereas studies have found that, after decades of combat in 

Afghanistan and Iraq, 20 percent of veterans of the 

Armed Forces are suffering from post-traumatic stress 

and depression; 

Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs found that veterans suffer a disproportionately higher rate of suicide 

compared to nonveterans, and post-traumatic stress, 

traumatic brain injury, depression, and anxiety are root 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 387 IH 

causes of the suicide epidemic in the veteran community, 

with an estimated 16.8 suicides per day in 2020; 

Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs has been successful in reducing the number of veterans’ suicides, but 

there are still gaps in mental health care for veterans, 

and the United States needs to use every treatment available to support the veteran community; 

Whereas studies have shown that exposure to nature and the 

outdoors have a positive therapeutic impact on mental 

health, including by resulting in lower risks of depression 

and improved focus and attention, and even a single day 

outside can improve an individual’s overall mood and 

lessen feelings of isolation; 

Whereas studies have found that individuals with increased 

access to green space have a lower suicide risk; 

Whereas the Forest Service sponsors a National Get Outdoors Day to promote the health benefits of outdoor recreational activities; 

Whereas the United States has recognized the need to connect veterans with nature by providing free admission to 

national parks and forests; and 

Whereas a targeted outreach effort, such as Veterans Get 

Outside Day, to veterans living with post-traumatic 

stress, traumatic brain injury, depression, and anxiety 

may lead to further participation in outside events and 

improved mental health outcomes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses support for the designation of 

3 ‘‘Veterans Get Outside Day’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 387 IH 

1 (2) encourages the Department of Veterans Af2 fairs, the Forest Service, and the Department of the 

3 Interior to coordinate and cooperate in promoting 

4 ‘‘Veterans Get Outside Day’’ along with National 

5 Get Outdoors Day. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of Hybrid
Coating Technologies Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2015, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph Kristul, Chief Executive Officer, and principal financial officer of
Hybrid Coating Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)   such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the information contained in such Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hybrid
Coating Technologies Inc.

April 14, 2016

/s/ Joseph Kristul-------------------------------Joseph Kristul President and
Chief Executive Officer,(Principal executive officer principal financial and
accounting officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

- 1 -

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 14, 2015 

# Order

July 14, 2015

151369 & ( 38 )

SUSAN H. FARR, CAROLYN D. SCHUTTLER,

and BYRON PRANGE,

Plaintiffs,

and

TRACY LEE,

Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

ST. JOHNS PUBLIC SCHOOLS

, Defendant

- Appellant,

and

ST. JOHNS BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Defendant. SC: 151369

COA: 319236

Clinton CC: 12

- 011074

- CD

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to any

party.
MELVIN B. THOMPSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5417

_____ ________________________/

Opinion filed February 12, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Terry P. Lewis , Judge

.

Melvin B. Thompson, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren L. Brudnicki, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.