alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Plainfield Enterprises LLC (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Alan Ginsberg, the
Operating Manager of the Company and performing certain services for the Company
commonly performed by the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 13,
      2009
            
            /s/
      Alan GinsbergAlan
      GinsbergOperating
      Manager
              (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-63495; LLORC00000: L14300000 EU0000; HAG-09-0074]


Notice of Realty Action: Receipt of Application for the 
Conveyance of Federally-Owned Mineral Interests; Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action informs the public of the receipt of an 
application from the surface estate owner for the acquisition of the 
Federally-owned mineral estate.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Rodriguez, Realty Specialist, 
Coos Bay District, 1300 Airport Lane, North Bend, Oregon 97459, at 
(541) 751-4462.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
209 of the Act of October 21, 1976 (90 Stat. 2757), William H. Hitner 
Jr. and Pamela J. Hitner has filed an application to purchase the 
Federally-owned mineral estate in the land described below:

Willamette Meridian

T. 28 S., R. 12 W.,
    Sec. 29, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 36.01 acres, more or less, in Coos 
County, Oregon.

    On March 25, 2009, the mineral interest described above will be 
segregated to the extent that it will not be open to appropriation 
under the public land laws including the mining laws. The segregative 
effect of the application shall terminate either upon issuance of a 
patent or other document of conveyance of such mineral interests, or 
upon rejection of the application, or two years from the date of filing 
of the application, February 9, 2006, whichever comes first. Due to a 
delay in processing the application as a result of mutual interest in 
coalbed methane exploration, the two year segregative effect will begin 
on March 25, 2009, as agreed to by the applicant and the Bureau of Land 
Management.

(Authority: 43 CFR 2720.1-1(2)(b))

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
Roberta B. Estes,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. E9-6571 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
----

Commission inquiry in the retail banking and business insurance sector

(2005/C 144/08)

On 13 June 2005 the Commission decided to open inquiries under Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (cases COMP/39190 and COMP/39191) into the following sectors of the economy: retail banking and business insurance. The Advisory Committee gave its favourable opinion. For information purposes the text of the decision is made available on the official website of Directorate General for Competition.

----
Exhibit 31.2

                                  Certification

I, Mark Stickney, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cosi, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
    prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
    the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
    fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2004

By: /s/ Mark Stickney
   --------------------
Mark Stickney
Chief Financial Officer
## Presentation to the Advisory Committee for Aviation



## Consumer Protection

Presenter: Andrew Weinstein

Executive Director Open Allies for Airfare Transparency

December 16, 2013

1

## About Open Allies

400+ Member Companies and Organizations Representing Tens of Millions of Travelers

2

## Principles for Future of Air Travel Distribution

• Transparency

• Choice



### • Competition

• Innovation

• Privacy

3

## Privacy Principle “Travelers should be able to shop anonymously in a setting in which all applicable privacy laws and regulations are respected. Customization should be at the request of the traveler, not at the demand of the supplier, and travel suppliers should allow travelers to decide which additional services they would like to receive, if any, whether traveling on business or for leisure with their family.”

4

## Personalization vs. Customization

Personalization = You tell me what you think I want Customization = I tell you what I 

### actually want

5

## Customized Home Shopping

6

## Personalized Home Shopping

• No listed prices



### • No central databases of available homes

• Each real estate company only shows its own properties



### • S ize and neighborhood predicted based on recent visits to other homes

• P rice "personalized" for each potential 

### buyer, depending on how much you paid for your last house

7

## Hansel and Gretel Cartoon

8

## A Consumer
- Focused Framework for Personalization

• Transparent
- Ancillaries should fully disclosed and transparent through all channels

• Consumer - driven

– Customization should respond to travelers’ requests, not airline predictions

• Anonymous
- Consumers should get broad range of customizable offers without providing personal information and have privacy rights protected

• Competitive
- Consumers should be able to compare equivalent fares and ancillary fees across airlines on multiple websites, not limited to apples

- to
- horses comparisons on different airline sites.

9

## Thank you!

10
Adam NAEGER, Appellant, v. ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

ED 107178

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: June 28, 2019 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 29, 2019

Brian Fellows, Fellows & Blake, LLC, 13421 Manchester Road, Suite 105, St. Louis, MO 63131, for appellant.

Michael D. Cerulo, Erica L. Briscoe, Baty, Holm, Nurmich & Otto, P.C., 7711 Bonhomme Ave., Suite 901, St. Louis, MO 63105, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

*854Adam Naeger ("Naeger") appeals the trial court's judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company ("Esurance"). We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32

                     BETA MUSIC GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Beta Music Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Michelle Tucker, President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Michelle Tucker
    -------------------
    Michelle Tucker
    President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
    March 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6404

JIMMY LEE HANEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-150)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 16, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lee Haney, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Lee Haney seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) on the grounds that it was filed beyond the one-year limit

for such actions. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Haney has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
##### 



SINOFRESH HEALTHCARE, INC.
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
FOR
CYNTHIA DUNN
 Agreement
 Grant of Option 10,000
 Exercise Schedule
 Method of Exercise
 Method of Payment




---



##### 



Termination of Option.
 th
  2




---



##### 



Stock Dividend or Reorganization.
      3




---



##### 



Transferability
 No Rights of Stockholders
 No Right to Employment
 Law Governing
 Notices
 Tax Consequences
 Exercise of Option.
 4




---



##### 



Disposition of Stock.
  COMPANY:SinoFresh Healthcare, Inc., a Florida corporationBy:Name:
    
    Charles FustTitle:
    
    Chairman and CEO
  OPTIONEE:Name:
    
    [Cynthia Dunn]
 5
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 1 7 , 2021
NO. 03 - 21 - 00032 - CV Appellants, John Roberts Austin I LP d/b/a Lexus of Austin and d/b/a Lexus of Lakeway, Vicki Roberts, Abby Elizabeth Argo, Randy Phillip Hoff, S teven Derrick Walker, Michael Lee Cobb, and Edward Cooke// Cross - Appellant, Vijay Netaji , Appellant s v. Appellee, Vijay Netaji//Cross - Appellees, John Roberts Austin I LP d/b/a Lexus of Austin

and d/b/a Lexus of Lakeway, Vicki Roberts, Abby Elizabeth Argo , Randy Phillip Hoff, Steven Derrick Walker, Michael Lee Cobb, and Edward Cooke , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH DISMISSED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE T RIANA
This is an appeal from the dist rict court ’ s December 21, 2020 final summary
- judgment order
. H aving reviewed the r ecord, the Court agree s that this appeal should be consolidated into cause number 03
- 21
- 00540
- CV and that this cause sh ould be dismissed. Therefore , the Court consolidates this ca use, transfers all the records and filings in this cause number to cause num ber 03
- 21
- 00540
- CV and dismisses cause number 03
- 21
- 00032
- CV. T he costs will be assessed on the dispo sition of cau se number 03
- 21
- 00540
- CV.
Exhibit 13.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Ecopetrol S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  April 19, 2018 |     |                          
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------
|                       | By: | /s/ Felipe Bayón Pardo   
|                       |     | Name:                    
|                       |     | Title:                   
|Dated:  April 19, 2018 |     |                          
|                       | By: | /s/ María Fernanda Suárez
|                       |     | Name:                    
|                       |     | Title:
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3781 — Crédit Agricole/Caisses d'Epargne/JV)

(2005/C 116/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
CHARLESTON.

#### Burgunder *et al. v.*Zeigler.

Submitted January 20, 1898 —

Decided March 26, 1898.

Attaci-im *iont*— Affidavits.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cabell County.

Suit in equity by Burgunder Bros, and others against Jacob Zeigler. Bill dismissed, and plaintiffs appeal.

*Reversed.*

Simms, Enslow and Hartman, for appellants.

Campbell, Holt & Campbell, Brown, Jaceson & Knight, and R. G-. Quarrier, for appellee.

*414BrANNON, PRESIDENT;

This was a suit in equity with attachment, resulting- in the quashing of affidavits and attachments, and dismissal of the bill, and appeal. It involves only the sufficiency of the affidavits and facts therein to warrant the attachment, and that upon questions disposed of in the case of *Miller*v. Zeigler, (this term) 29 S. E. 981, and the case requires no further opinion. Decrees quashing attachments and affidavits and dismissing the bill reversed, motions to quash attachment and affidavit overruled, and demurrer overruled, and case remand ed for further proceedings.

*Reversed.*
Nedal ALAZZAM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
Jonathan Jared LERSCHEA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4116

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the annual report of Liberator, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ronald P. Scott, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as
of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.




Date:
      February 12, 2010
                /s/
      Ronald P. ScottRonald
      P. ScottChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
                  Accounting
      Officer)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER AND N OTICE OF I NTENT TO D ISMISS FOR W ANT OF P ROSECUTION

Appellate case name: Cecilia Clinkscale v. Corporate Auto Services, Inc., et al.

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00 938

- CV

Trial court case number: 1 059855

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

On December 23, 2015, appellant, Cecilia Clinkscale, proceeding pro se , filed a notice of appeal in the trial court from the order denying her verified motion to reinstate case on docket, signed on September 23, 2015, in this contract action. Because appellant filed an affidavit of indigence for appellate costs in th is Cour t, the Clerk of this Court

forwarded it to the trial clerk on December 29, 2015, and requested that an indigent

clerk’s record be filed within 30 days . On January 6 , 201 6 , the indigent clerk’s record

w as filed in this Court attaching the trial court’s ord er, signed on January 5, 2016, sustaining the trial clerk’s contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 20.1(e)(1), (i)(4).

A party claiming indigence for appellate costs may seek review of a trial court’s order sustaining a contest to her affidavit of indigence by filing a motion challenging the order, within 10 days of that order, in the appellate court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 20.1(j)(1), (2). Here, because appellant failed to timely file such a motion, the Clerk of this Court is directed to mark appellant not indigent for purposes of appellate costs. See id. 20.1(j)(2).

Accordingly, b ecause appellant ha s not established indig ence, it is ORDERED

that s he pay the $ 205 .00 filing fee to the Clerk of this Court and file evidence with the Clerk of this Court of payment or arrangements to pay the trial clerk for the $234.00

clerk’s record fee within 30 days of the date of this order, or this appeal may be

dismissed without further notice

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

It is so ORDERED

. Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually

Date: February 2, 2016
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000973

17-JUN-2019

08:55 AM
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, James E. Hogue, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of
Wiltex A, Inc., (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       the accompanying Form 10QSB report for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
company.


                                      By:  /s/ JAMES E. HOGUE
                                      -----------------------
                                      James E. Hogue
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

Date:  August 13, 2003

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                 WILTEX A, INC.
                                  (Registrant)



Date:  August 13,  2003                        /s/ James E. Hogue
       ----------------------------            ---------------------------------
                                               James E. Hogue
                                               Chief Executive Officer