alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the annual report of Liberator, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Louis S. Friedman, Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of WES Consulting, Inc.*, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





Date:
      June 30, 2010
                /s/
      Louis S. FriedmanLouis
      S. FriedmanChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)of WES Consulting, Inc.
      *




* On
October 19, 2009, Liberator, Inc. merged with and into WES Consulting,
Inc.  As WES Consulting, Inc. is the surviving entity from such merger
and Liberator, Inc. has been merged out, this certification is signed by the
Principal Executive Officer of WES Consulting, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service <SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 3, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service [supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 407 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-102, 
CP2018-144.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-28364 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
From: ALDRIDGE Steve [steve.aldridge@us.knaufinsulation.com]

Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:27 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov; Reeves, David

Subject: FW: Residual Risk data response to EPA

Attachments: Shelbyville Aerial view with stk locations 5

- 25

- 11.jpg; Shasta Lake Aerial view

with stk locations 5

- 25

- 11.jpg; Lanett Aerial view with stk locations 5

- 25

- 11.jpg; Copy of Wool Fiberglass Modeling Sources by Co 5 26 11

- Knauf.xls

Ms. Hancy

,

Please find attached Knauf Insulation’s Modeling Sources spreadsheet and aerial photo with stack IDs added as requested by EPA through Angus Crane at NAIMA. We are working on the four additional questions submitted to Mr. Crane and should have that info to you by the end of next week.

If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call.

Stephen R. Aldridge Manager Corporate EH&S

KNAUF INSULATION

Tel: 866

- 445

- 2363, Ext. 8408 | Fax: 317

- 398

- 5501 | Mobile: 317

- 401

- 0564 

#  Before printing, please think about the environment!

DISCLAIMER of Knauf Insulation: This e

- mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e

- mail. If you have received this message in error please notify postmaster@us.kna ufinsulation.com and delete the message and any attachments accompanying it immediately. Although Knauf Insulation operates an active anti

- virus policy, the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e

- mail.

Pleas e note that any views expressed in this e

- mail may be those of the originator and do not necessarily
reflect those of the organization.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION 

File Name: 17a0289n.06 

No. 16-3824 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

MICHAEL HASAN, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

OHIO 

BEFORE: CLAY, GIBBONS, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. The issue presented by this case is whether Michael Hasan’s 

aggravated-robbery conviction pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 2911.01(A)(1) qualifies as a 

violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act’s (“ACCA”) use-of-force clause. On April 

3, 2017, we definitively answered that question. In United States v. Patterson, 853 F.3d 298 

(6th Cir. 2017), a unanimous panel of this court held that a conviction under § 2911.01(A)(1) is 

categorically a violent felony pursuant to the ACCA’s use-of-force clause because the Ohio 

statute requires proof of the use, attempted use, or threated use of physical force against another 

person. That resolves this matter. Accordingly, because his Ohio aggravated-robbery conviction 

qualifies as an ACCA predicate offense, we affirm the district court’s determination that Hasan 

is an armed career criminal.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6379]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 03/03-0247]


Solutions Capital I, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 
312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Solutions Capital I, L.P., 1100 Wilson 
Blvd., Suite 3000, Arlington, VA 22209, a Federal Licensee under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest, of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Solutions Capital I, L.P., proposes to provide equity/debt security 
financing to Total Sleep Holdings, Inc., 1425 Greenway Drive, Suite 
300, Irving, TX 75038. The financing is contemplated for the pay down 
of an existing senior lender and for working capital.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because MCG Capital Corporation, an Associate of 
Solutions Capital I, L.P., owns more than ten percent of Total Sleep 
Holdings, Inc.; therefore Total Sleep Holdings, Inc. is considered an 
Associate of Solutions Capital I, L.P., as defined in Sec. 105.50 of 
the regulations.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: March 15, 2009.
Harry E. Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. E9-6379 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Audley O. KERR and Suzette T. Kerr, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSN., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0668

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
Librada GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. BEACH WALK RESORT, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-3881

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DISMISSED.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Metro Psychological Services, P.C., as Assignee of Adams Kenneth, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Office of Melissa Betancourt, P.C. (Melissa Betancourt of counsel), for appellant.Abrams, Cohen &amp; Associates, P.C. (Frank Piccininni of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Steven Z. Mostofsky, J.), entered August 19, 2016. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment. </p><p>Plaintiff correctly contends that defendant's papers failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the denial of claim forms had been timely mailed (<a href="../2008/2008_04072.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123</a> [2008]). As a result, defendant did not demonstrate that it is not precluded from asserting its proffered defenses. Consequently, defendant is not entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. </p><p>However, contrary to plaintiff's further contention, plaintiff failed to establish that the claims at issue had not been timely denied (<a href="../2015/2015_04787.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Viviane Etienne Med. Care, P.C. v Country-Wide Ins. Co.</i>, 25 NY3d 498</a> [2015]), or that defendant had issued timely denials of claim that were conclusory, vague or without merit as a matter of law (<a href="../2010/2010_08933.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Westchester Med. Ctr. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.</i>, 78 AD3d 1168</a> [2010]; <a href="../2011/2011_51292.htm" target="_blank"><i>Ave T MPC Corp. v Auto One Ins. Co.</i>, 32 Misc 3d 128</a>[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 51292[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2011]). As a result, plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment was properly denied.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is modified by providing that defendant's motion for summary <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><br>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.<br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 10, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
EX PARTE Clyde ANDERSON, Jr.

CR-16-0014

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
[No. 21944-5-III.

Division Three.

April 27, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Scott Wood, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 02-1-02707-6, Salvatore F. Cozza, J., entered March 28, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Kato, C. J., and Schultheis, J.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 4, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 28, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 419 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-117, 
CP2018-159.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-28451 Filed 1-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX PARTE Robert W. CROSHON

CR-15-0631

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 17, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Beta Music Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

         3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: August 4, 2010

                                       By: /s/ Edwin Mendlinger
                                           --------------------
                                           Edwin Mendlinger
                                           Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Michael J. Fournier, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Willbros Group, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2018 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Michael J. Fournier              
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Michael J. Fournier                  
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München by order of that court of 17 April 2005 in Sachsenmilch AG v Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg

(Case C-196/05)

(2005/C 182/47)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht München (Finance Court, Munich) (Germany) of 17 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 4 May 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Sachsenmilch AG and Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg on the following questions:

----

(1)OJ 2003 L 281, p. 1.

(2)OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

----
Brian K. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3163

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 4, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 420 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-118, CP2018-160.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-28452 Filed 1-3-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Samuel A. MCMURRAY, Appellant.

WD 81442

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: April 30, 2019

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, for Appellant.

Before Division Three: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge *167***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Samuel McMurray appeals his convictions of first-degree child molestation and second-degree child molestation following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, arguing the trial court abused its discretion by limiting his cross-examination of a State's expert witness. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).
#### In the Matter of Harold Mayeri, Appellant, v Israella Mayeri, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 582]

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Bangs County (Turbow, J.), dated September 28, 1999, which denied his objection to an order of the same court (Spegele, H.E.), dated May 6, 1999, which, after a hearing, *inter alia,*directed the entry of a judgment against him for child support arrears in the sum of $5,070.98.

.Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Family Court Act § 439 (e) provides that an aggrieved party may submit to a Family Court Judge specific written objections to the final order of the Hearing Examiner within 35 days after the mailing of the order to such party. Since the father did not timely submit written objections to the Hearing Examiner’s final order of support, the Family Court properly refused to consider the objections on this ground.

*474Moreover, the Family Court also properly refused to consider the father’s objections on the ground that he failed to file proof of service of a copy of the objections on the mother *(see, Matter of Rinaldi v Rinaldi,*239 AD2d 506; *Matter of Fokine v Prisciantelli,*208 AD2d 534). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
## Docket Number FAA**- 2012**  **- 0144** 

**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  7/1/11 **Regional Airline Association Con**  **nie Arnold**  7/1/11

**Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  7/1/11 **ATA Joe White**  7/1/11
Thor Halvorssen-MENDOZA, Appellant, v. DERWICK ASSOCIATES CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D16-1816

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Donald DEARDORFF v. STATE

CR-12-1966

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32. 2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





BIOCANCELL THERAPEUTICS INC.





FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I am the Chief Financial Officer of BioCancell Therapeutics Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-K”).





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date: March 18, 2010/s/ IRA WEINSTEINIra WeinsteinChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Bruce J. KAVITSKY, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. SUN QUEST HOMES, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4856

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WALTER JOHN BROIS, DOC #539452, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-834

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed July 11, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Christopher C. 

Sabella, Judge.

Walter John Brois, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, 

Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CRENSHAW, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Terence WILSON

NO. 2017-KK-2136

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.