alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ANTHONY v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 31, 1942.

*621Guy Anthony, of Los Angeles, Cal., in propria persona.

No other appearances were entered.

Before DENMAN; MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks our order permitting him to file and prosecute in forma pauperis a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, which petitioner alleges “deprives him of re-employment and back wages due.” The National Labor Relations Act gives this court no jurisdiction of such a controversy. To invoke our jurisdiction under § 10 of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160, the petitioner must be a “person aggrieved” by the order. A workman has no personal claim for back pay or reinstatement in employment en-forcible in this court. Hence he is not a “person aggrieved” within the meaning of that Act. National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 309 U.S. 350, 363, 60 S.Ct. 569, 84 L.Ed. 799; National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash *&*Chemical Corp., 9 Cir., 113 F.2d 232, 235, 129 A.L.R. 874; National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co., 9 Cir., 125 F.2d 757, 761.

The petition is denied.
Harlan BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2529

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jon J. UHLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1125

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Patricia Ann BARNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-1814

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7415

RAY DERWOOD SIZEMORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NICHOLAS J. HUN, West Virginia Division of

Corrections; WILLIAM C. DUNCIL, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center; J. N. LILLER,

Warden, Pruntytown Correctional Center; ROY

WHITE, Medical Director, Huttonsville Correctional Center; GENE HARLOW, M.D., Pruntytown

Correctional Center; EARNEST HART, M.D., Huttonsville Correctional Center; MOOSA KISMET,

M.D., Huttonsville Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-6-2)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ray Derwood Sizemore, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie K. Kiser, WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark

Sheridan Brennan, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Sizemore v. Hun, No. CA-97-6-2 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 4,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 8, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00918

- CR

Gary A. CAMPBELL

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3125

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Strike is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
The final version of the proposed plan, technical support document and all supporting

material can be found on the www.regulations.gov web site.

EPA will be accepting comments on the proposed plan until July 2, 2012. Please identify

your comments with the following docket ID : EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2012

- 0345

Federal Rulemaking Portal:

http://www.regulations.gov

follow the online instructions for submitting comments

E

- mail writt en comments to:

nudd.gregory@epa.gov

Do not submit information that you consider to be Confidential Business Information or

otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or e

- mail.

Mail or hand

- deliver written comments to 1 :

Gregory Nudd (AIR

- 2 )

U.S. EPA, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

- 3901

Submit oral and/ or written comments and data at EPA’s Public Hearing:

May 31, 2012.

6:30

- 8:30 p.m.

The University of Hawaii, Maui College

Pilina Multipurpose Room

310 W. Kaahumanu Ave.

Kahului, Hawaii 96732

1 Hand and courier deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m.

- 4:30 p.m.,

excluding Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed

information. 

## HOW	DO	I	COMMENT	ON THE	PROPOSAL?

STATE	OF	HAWAII

REGIONAL	HAZE

PROPOSED FEDERAL	IMPLEMENTATI ON	PLAN
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant v. Christy Hanley SHIRCLIFF, Respondent

2018-SC-000607-KB

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

ENTERED June 13, 2019

***ORDER***

On February 14, 2019, this Court suspended Christy Hanley Shircliff from the practice of law under SCR 3.380(2) for her failure to respond to a disciplinary charge. On April 18, 2019, we amended specific portions of our February 14, 2019 Order but left in place Shircliff's indefinite suspension. On April 18, 2019, we also ordered Shircliff to "show this Court all legally satisfactory reasons she has why she should not be held in contempt of this Court for her failure to comply with the suspension order entered February 14, 2019."

Shircliff has now filed a response to the Show Cause Order, and she has further moved to terminate her indefinite suspension.

Although Shircliff has offered an account for her failure to respond to the original disciplinary charge, her motion to terminate indefinite suspension before this Court is premature because the underlying disciplinary proceeding and an additional bar complaint are pending at the Kentucky Bar Association.

Accordingly, we ORDER that

> (1) Shircliff's Motion to Terminate Indefinite Suspension is DENIED; and

> (2) Consideration of her response to the April 18, 2019 Show Cause Order is PASSED pending resolution of any pending disciplinary proceedings.

/s/ *John D. Minton, Jr.*

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN D. MINTON, JR.

All sitting. All concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 3, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service ® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 413 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-108, CP2018-150.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-28370 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Law 92-463) and Public Law 110-343, enacted on October 3, 2008, reauthorizing and amending the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Black Hills National Forest Custer County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Tuesday, April 7, 2009 in Custer, South Dakota. The meeting is open to the public. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting on April 7, 2009 will begin at 5:30 p.m. at the Black Hills National Forest Supervisor's Office at 25041 North Highway 16, Custer, South Dakota. Agenda topics will be Project review and selection and other general business. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lynn Kolund, Hell Canyon District Ranger and Designated Fed Official, at 605-673-4853. 

Lynn Kolund, 

District Ranger. 

[FR Doc. E9-7163 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE
Byron Jerome MCCLENDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5834

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017 Rehearing Denied November 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
From: "Allen, Chris" <Chris.Allen@alcoa.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/13/2011 12:59 PM

Subject: Alcoa Warrick Operations

Rochelle,

Attached you will find the KMZ file for Warrick along with the release

point spreadsheet with its corrections. I hope this is what you needed/

wanted. Please let me know if there is anything else from our location.

Thanks,

<<Alcoa Inc Warrick NEI32661.kmz>> <<ReleasePoint_NEI32661c.xls>> 

Chris Allen

Alcoa Warrick Operations

812-853-4639 (phone)

812-470-1749 (cell)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

/s/ A. Leon Blaser

A. Leon Blaser, Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 9, 2005
# 1 

# A ppendix E. Data Requirement Tables Table E-1. Ecological Effects Data Requ irements for DMDS

Guideline # Data Requirement Are Additional Data Needed for Risk Assessment? MRID #’s Study Classification

71-1(a) Avian Acute Oral N 470528-13 Acceptable

------ Avian Acute Inhala tion N 469170-13 Acceptable 71-2(a) Avian Dietary–quail N ------------ ------------ 71-2(b) Avian Dietary–mallard N ------------ -------------

--------- Avian Subchronic/Chronic Inhalation N ------------- ------------- 72-1(a) Fish Acute Toxicity–bluegill Zebrafish N 470528-15 Acceptable

72-1(b) Fish Acute Toxicity–r ainbow trout N 470528-14 Acceptable 72-2(a) Aquatic Invertebrate Acute Toxicity– freshwater N 470528-16 Acceptable

72-3(a) Marine/Estuarine Acute Toxicity–Fish N 473075-04 Acceptable 72-3(b) Marine/Estuarine Acute Toxicity– Mollusk (shell deposition) N ------------ -------------
72-3(c) Marine/Estuarine Acute Toxicity– Shrimp N 473075-05 Acceptable

72-4(a) Fish Early Life Stage–freshwater Y ------------- ------------- 72-4(a) Fish Early Life Stage– marine/estuarine Y ------------ ------------- 72-4(b) Aquatic Invertebrate Life Cycle– freshwater Y ----------- ------------
123-1(a) Seedling Germination/Seedling Emergence–Tier II N ------------- ------------
123-1(b) Vegetative Vigor–Tier II Y 474712-02 Supplemental

123-2 Aquatic Plant Growth – Tier II N 474712-04, 474712-05, 474712-06 474712-07 470528-17 Acceptable

141-1 Honeybee Acute Contact N 474712-03 Acceptable



## Table E-2. Environmenta l Fate Data Requirements for DMDS

# 2 Guideline # Data Requirement Are Additional Data Needed

for Risk Assessment? MRID #’s Study Classification

835.2120 Hydrolysis No 46903532 S 835.2240 Photodegradation in water Yes 42900201 S 835.2410 Photodegradation in soil No ----- W 835.4100 Aerobic soil metabolism No 47052819 S 835.4200 Anaerobic soil metabolism No 47052820 S 835.4300 Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism Yes

----- NA
835.4400 Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism Yes

----- NA
835.1230 835.1240 Leaching and adsorption/ desorption No 46917014 46917015 S
835.8100 Field Volatility Yes 47052821 47052822 47052823 47052824 47820001 A A A A A 835.6100 Terrestrial Field Dissipation No ----- W 850.1710 850.1730 850.1850 Aquatic organisms – bioavailability, biomagnification, toxicity No

----- W Special Environmental Chemistry Methods and Independent

Laboratory Validations Yes

---- NA Special Ambient Air Qualit y Data On Reserve ----- NA A=Acceptable; S=Supplemental; U=Unnaceptable; W=Waived; N/A= Not Applicable; NA=Not Availabl e; Inv.=Invalid; R=Potentially Repairable
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF AMENDED PERIODIC REPORT I, Robert Waters, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Avalon Gold Corporation, a Nevada Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the amended
quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 28, 2003

/s/ Robert Waters
Robert Waters
President and Chief Executive Officer
Steven WINTERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81441

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: April 30, 2019

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Steven Winters appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
Damanta Jamar MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-2115

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

Forseth, Mark (FAA)

From: Kevin Jones <Kevin.Jones@livetv.net>

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 11:39 AM

To: Forseth, Mark (FAA)

Cc: Won, Ian Y (FAA)

Subject: RE: Time-limit extension for exemption no. 10760

Dear Mr. Forseth,

                LiveTV would like to withdraw our request for time‐limit extension for exemption number 10706.  

April 23, 2014 LiveTV received the Supplemental Type Certificate which shows compliance to 14 CFR 25.571(e)(1)

without limitation to said regulation.  

Thank you and regards,

Kevin Jones

Certification Engineer

LiveTV

8900 Hangar Blvd.

Orlando, FL 32827

T: 407‐812‐2521

F: 407‐812‐2621

C: 321‐474‐2309

E: kevin.jones@livetv.net

From: Mark.Forseth@faa.gov [mailto:Mark.Forseth@faa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 1:55 PM 

To: Kevin Jones 

Cc: Ian.Y.Won@faa.gov

Subject: Time-limit extension for exemption no. 10760 

Dear Mr. Jones:

By letter dated March 7, 2014, the FAA requested more information regarding your petition for an extension to the time

limit for the subject exemption. Our letter to LiveTV is attached.

Please indicate whether you intend to respond, or if you intend to withdraw your request. You may send your reply

directly via e‐mail and we can upload it to the Federal Docket (docket no. FAA‐2013‐0373), or you may upload it directly

to the docket at regulations.gov.  

We hope to avoid a last‐minute emergency project in the event you need an extension to the exemption.

Best regards,  

Mark Forseth 

Regulatory Technical Writer-Editor, ANM-113 

Standardization Branch 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

ph: 425-227-2796
----

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2005/C 177/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption: 

Member State: Germany

Aid No: N 3/04

Title: R&D Programme ‘WING’

Objective: To support R&D projects in the field of new materials

Legal basis: 

Haushaltsgesetz, Einzelplan 30, Kapitel 3006

Budget: EUR 85 million per year

Intensity or amount: 

Duration: until 31.12.2008

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption: 

Member State: Germany

Aid No: N 32/04

Title: Aid Programme ‘Aid for the use of renewable energies’

Objective: More efficient generation and use of energy as well as energy saving, climate protection

Legal basis: 

Richtlinie des BMU zur Förderung von Maßnahmen zur Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien i.V.m. Haushaltsgesetz des Bundes

Budget: Max. EUR 40 million per year for enterprises

Intensity or amount: Up to 40 % of eligible costs

Duration: until 31.12.2006

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption: 

Member State: The Netherlands

Case No: N 101/2004

Title: EOS Energy Research

Objective: To support national and international Research and Development projects in the field of energy research.

Legal basis: 

Kaderwet EZ subsidies (Staatsblad 1997, 638)

Budget: EUR 106 million

Intensity or amount: 50 % to 100 %

Duration: 10 years

Other information: Annual report

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption: 

Member State: Germany (Berlin)

Aid No: N 574/03

Title: R&D Programme ‘ProFit’

Objective: To support R&D projects carried out in Berlin and consequently support structural change in its economy

Legal basis: 

§§ 23 und 44 Landeshaushaltsordnung Berlin i.V.m. Programmrichtlinien

Budget: EUR 10 million per year

Intensity or amount: 

Duration: until 31.12.2006

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption: 

Member State: Germany

Aid No: N 602/03

Title: R&D Programme ‘Microsystems’

Objective: To support R&D projects in the field of Microsystems

Legal basis: 

Haushaltsgesetz, Einzelplan 30, Kapitel 3006

Budget: EUR 53 to 60 million per year

Intensity or amount: 

Duration: until 31.12.2009

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

----
Rafael TOIRAC-AGUILERA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Executive Committee, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR Part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, March 31, 2009 at 11:30 a.m.

# Subject Matter:

To make award actions.

# Status:

Closed.

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (                        *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Clifford Gabriel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7571.                    

Ann Ferrante,

Writer-Editor.

[FR Doc. E9-6834 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Justin Watson PARR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.