alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Richard A. ALEXANDER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-3866

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14161-14162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6998]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Data Users Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting and Agenda

    The first meeting of the Data Users Advisory Committee will be held 
Thursday, April 23, 2009. The meeting will be held in the Postal Square 
Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Washington, DC.
    The Data Users Advisory Committee is a technical committee composed 
of data users from various sectors of the U.S. economy, including 
labor, business, research, academic and government communities. 
Committee members are called upon to provide advice on technical 
matters related to the collection, tabulation, and analysis of the 
Bureau's statistics, on its published reports, and on the broader

[[Page 14162]]

aspects of its overall mission and function.
    The meeting will be held in Meeting Room 1 of the Postal Square 
Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are 
as follows:

8:30 Registration
9:00 Opening Remarks and introductions
10:15 Discussion of future priorities
11:15 BLS Web site redesign
1:15 BLS product initiatives
2:45 Debunking myths about BLS data series
4:45 Conclusion

    The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the 
meeting should be directed to Tracy A. Jack, Data Users Advisory 
Committee, on 202-691-5869. Individuals with disabilities, who need 
special accommodations, should contact Ms. Jack at least two days prior 
to the meeting date.


    Signed at Washington, DC, the 25th day of March 2009.
Philip L. Rones,
Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
 [FR Doc. E9-6998 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6251

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY PRESTON MCCLUNG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (5:97-cr-30031-jhm-1; 7:06-cv-00031-jct)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: September 29, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Preston McClung, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Preston McClung seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that McClung has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny McClung’s motion

for production of records and transcripts, construed as a petition

for writ of mandamus, deny a certificate of appealability, and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 529 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 529

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 22, 2023.
    Resolved, That House Resolution 503 is hereby re-referred to the Committee 
on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Marcia PINTO, Appellant, v. Robin KARAS and Kara Karas, Appellees.

No. 4D16-2802

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
David MANSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-4232

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3733 — DOW/DDE)

(2005/C 139/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Exhibit 13.2


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934





In connection with the Annual Report of China Gerui Advanced Materials Group Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward Meng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Edward MengName:
Edward MengTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
July11, 2011




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B)
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Golden Green Enterprises Limited (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Mingwang Lu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and results of
operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
 /s/ Mingwang LuName:
                Mingwang
      LuTitle:
                Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
                October
      20, 2009
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of this Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
|   | A) | In the event that Koos voluntarily resigns as either President or CEO of ENTB prior to a date that is six months from issuance (“Vesting Date”) the Stock shall be returned to the Corporation. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | B) | Koos will not offer to sell, sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the Bonus Shares prior to the Vesting Date  |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ENTB                    | KOOS                   |
|-------------------------|------------------------|
|                    |                   |
| By: /s/David R. Koos    |  /s/David R. Koos |
|                    |                   |
| Name: David R. Koos     |                   |
| Its: Chairman & CEO |                   |
|                    |                   |
|                    |                   |
| Date: August 8, 2009    | Date: August 8, 2009   |
Christine D. SNYDER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Brian K. SNYDER, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1613

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 03, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Ping-Shun Lai, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, of Asia Global Holdings Corp.:





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: February 21, 2010
/s/ Ping-Shun LaiPing-Shun Lai, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2007 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ A. Leon Blaser  A. Leon Blaser, Chief Executive Officer  Date:  August 1, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 628 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 628

   Eliminating the Office of Diversity and Inclusion of the House of 
                Representatives, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2023

Mr. Mooney (for himself, Mr. Nehls, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Good of 
Virginia, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Babin, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Roy, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. 
Bergman, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Biggs, and Mr. Norman) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules, 
and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Eliminating the Office of Diversity and Inclusion of the House of 
                Representatives, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATING OFFICE OF DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION.

    (a) In General.--The Office of Diversity and Inclusion of the House 
of Representatives is hereby terminated.
    (b) Conforming Amendments to Rules of the House.--
            (1) Conforming amendment relating to establishment of 
        office of diversity and inclusion.--Rule II of the Rules of the 
        House of Representatives is amended--
                    (A) by striking clause 9; and
                    (B) by redesignating clause 10 as clause 9.
            (2) Conforming amendment relating to oversight.--Clause 
        4(d)(1)(A) of rule X of the Rules of the House of 
        Representatives is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``the Office of Diversity and 
                Inclusion,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Office of Diversity and 
                Inclusion,''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daleco Resources Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2003 and as amended
February 27, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Gary J. Novinskie, President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of
                operations of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Gary J. Novinskie
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Gary J. Novinskie
                                         President and Chief Financial Officer
                                         November 18, 2004
Barry Van WHITTON v. STATE

CR-15-0333

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Sherman Johnson *v.*Calvary Lunsford

(No. 7308)

Submitted January 17, 1933.

Decided January 24, 1933.

*Daugherty & Daugherty,*for appellant.

*A. F. Morris,*for appellee.

Hatcher, Judge:

Plaintiff is the owner of land, which is cut off from the public road by land of the defendant. Both tracts were originally owned by a remote common grantor and the defendant concedes that plaintiff is entitled to a way of necessity to the public road. This suit involves the right of plaintiff to use a certain route thereto.

For some thirty years the former owner of plaintiff’s land used without interruption a way across defendant’s land described by the plaintiff as “down the lane to the creek and right up the creek, and up into the road right at Mr. Luns-ford’s house.” The plaintiff testified: “I was pulling up there one day, up the creek road, and Calvary Lunsford said, 'Go down across by the house and by the barn,’ that he had *271made a road down by the barn”; that this conversation occurred some twenty years ago and since then he (plaintiff) had used the way by the barn when he had heavy loads, and had used a short-cut (to the public road) up the creek bank below the barn, when he had an empty wagon or was on horseback. Recently, defendant obstructed the way by the barn, but has never interfered with the way up the creek. The circuit court enjoined defendant from obstructing or interfering with plaintiff’s free use of the way by the barn.

The initial use by the former owner of plaintiff’s land of the creek route for thirty years without objection, was a practical location of his way of necessity. That way having become fixed, the dominant owner could not thereafter change the location as a matter of right. 10 A. & Ency. Law 429, 430. Plaintiff’s use of the disputed route, according to his own testimony, was entirely permissive, so he obtained no right thereto by prescription. 22 A. & E. Ency. Law 1196. His brief contends that the way by the barn “was granted to him by defendant in consideration of a surrender and abandonment of the former way.” Unfortunately for the contention, there is no evidence to support it. Plaintiff parted with nothing of value for the use of the later way, and the defendant profited nothing thereby. Defendant’s permission Avas voluntarily given, and no reason appears why it could not be voluntarily withdrawn.

The juclgment of the circuit court is accordinglj'- reversed, and. the plaintiff’s bill dismissed.

*Reversed; till dismissed.*
**EXHIBIT 10.3****SWING LINE NOTE**$3,000,000 June 30, 2006     On the Revolving Credit Maturity Date, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, North Pointe Holdings Corporation,a Michigan, corporation (“Company”), promises to pay to the order of Comerica Bank (“Swing LineBank”) at Detroit, Michigan, in lawful money of the United States of America, so much of the sum ofThree Million Dollars ($3,000,000), as may from time to time have been advanced by Swing Line Bankto Company and then be outstanding hereunder pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated CreditAgreement dated as of June 30, 2006 made by and among Company and certain banks signatory thereto,including the Swing Line Bank, in its individual capacity and as Agent for such banks, as the samemay be amended or otherwise modified from time to time (the “Credit Agreement”), together withinterest thereon as hereinafter set forth.     Each of the Advances made hereunder shall bear interest at the Applicable Interest Rate fromtime to time applicable thereto under the Credit Agreement or as otherwise determined thereunder,and interest shall be computed, assessed and payable as set forth in the Credit Agreement.     This Note is a Swing Line Note under which Advances of the Swing Line (including refundingsand conversions), repayments and readvances may be made from time to time by Swing Line Bank, butonly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement. This Note evidencesborrowings under, is subject to, is secured in accordance with, and may be accelerated or prepaidunder, the terms of the Credit Agreement, to which reference is hereby made. Capitalized terms usedherein, except as defined to the contrary, shall have the meanings given them in the CreditAgreement.     This Note shall be interpreted and the rights of the parties shall be determined under thelaws of, and enforceable in, the State of Michigan.     Company hereby waives presentment for payment, demand, protest and notice of dishonor andnonpayment of this Note and agrees that no obligation hereunder shall be discharged by reason ofany extension, indulgence, release, or forbearance granted by any holder of this Note to any partynow or hereafter liable hereon or any present or subsequent owner of any property, real orpersonal, which is now or hereafter security for this Note.
i

 
     Nothing herein shall limit any right granted Swing Line Bank by any other instrument or bylaw.       **NORTH POINTE HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation**       By:             Its:      
ii
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 537 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 537

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to clarify that the 
  payment of a bail bond constitutes a gift for purposes of the Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2023

Mr. Cohen submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to clarify that the 
  payment of a bail bond constitutes a gift for purposes of the Rules.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF PAYMENT OF BAIL BOND AS GIFT.

    Clause 5(a)(2)(A) of rule XXV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by striking the period at the end of the 
first sentence and inserting the following: ``, including making a 
payment for or otherwise guaranteeing the bail bond of another 
person.''.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TREVARIOUS J. PRIDE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2403

[April 25, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562004CF001648A.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Trevarious J. Pride, Bowling Green, appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.