T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. F E RN A N D O C A Z A R E S , a/k/a “ S N E A K Y ”, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 06- 50677 D . C . N o. C R - 04- 00415- P A - 04 ME MOR AN DU M *

UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. GI L B E R T S AL DA NA , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 06- 50678 D . C . N o. C R -04-00 41 5-P A -2

UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , N o. 06- 50679 D . C . N o. C R - 04- 00415- P A - 01



# FI LED MA Y06 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

Th e H o n o r ab l e La w r e n c e L. Pi e r s o l , Se n i o rD i s tr i c tJu d g e f o rth e U . S. ** D i s tr i c tC ourtf

orthe D i s tr i c tof

S outh D a kot a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. v. ALEJ AN DRO M ARTINEZ, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. P O R F IR IO A V IL A , a/k/ a D re am er , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 07- 50037 D . C . N o. C R - 04- 00415- P A - 05 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia P e r c yA nde r s on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r11, 2012

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B e f or e : P R E G E R S O N a nd W . F L E T C H E R , C i r c ui tJudge s , a nd P I E R S O L , S e ni or D i stri ctJudg e. ** A ju ryc o n v ic te dd e f

e n d a n ts A le

jan d r o M artin e z , G ilb e rt S a ld añ a , P o r f ir io A vi l a, and F ernand o C az ar es of vi ol at i ng 18 U . S . C . § 2 41 by conspi ri ng t o “ i nj ure,op pres s, threa t en, or i nt i m i dat e” A fr i can A m er i cans i n the H i gh l and P ark

ne i ghborhood of

L os A nge l e s . T he j urya l s o c onvi c t e d S a l daña , A vi l a , a nd C a z a r e s o f

k illin g K e n n e th W ils o n in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 2 4 5 ( b ) . T h e e v id e n c e a t tr ia l in c lu d e ds ta te m e n ts th a t S a ld añ ag a v e to th e p o lic e . N e i the rpa rtydi s put e s tha tS a l da ñaw a s nott ol d hi s M i r andar i ght s be f or e , dur i ng, o ra f te rh is in te rv ie w o n M a y6 , 1 9 9 9 . T h e d is p u te dis s u e is w h e th e rh e w a s in c u s to d yw h e n h e m a d e h is s ta te m e n ts . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d e n ie dS a ld añ a ’s m o tio n to s up p r e s s h is s ta te m e n ts , b u t it m ade no factual fi nd i ng s r egar di ng w hether S al daña w as i n cust od y. “ W hen fa ctual i ss ues are i nv ol ved i n d ec i di ng a m ot i on , the courtm ustst at e i t s e ss ent i al f i ndi ngs on the r e c or d. ” F e d. R . C r i m . P . 12( d) . W e r e ve r s e the de ni a l of S a ld a ñ a ’s m o tio n to s up p r e s s a n d“r e m an dw ith in s tru c tio n s to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt to m ake e ss ent i alfa ctual fi nd i ng s e xp l ai ni ng the basi s f or i t s dec i si on . ” U

ni ted States v . W r i ght , 62 5 F . 3d 58 3, 60 4 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). T h e d en i al o f S al d añ a’ s m o t i o n t o sup p ress i s RE V E RS E D and RE MAND E D to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f o rf a c t f in d in g o n w h e th e rS a ld añ aw a s in c us t odyw he n he m a de hi s s t a t e m e nt s t o the pol i c e . W e de f e rs ubm i s s i on of

the r e s t o f th e ap p e a l p e n d in g th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s f a c t f in d in g .