This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

13395 

Vol. 74, No. 58 

Friday, March 27, 2009 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation 

Funding Opportunity Title: Commodity 

Partnerships for Small Agricultural 

Risk Management Education Sessions 

(Commodity Partnerships Small 

Sessions Program) 

Announcement Type: Announcement 

of availability of funds and request for 

application for competitive cooperative 

partnership agreements. 

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Number (CFDA): 10.459. 

DATES: Hard copy applications are due 

5 p.m. EST, May 11, 2009. Electronic 

applications submitted through 

Grants.gov are due at 11:59 p.m. EST, 

May 11, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance 

Corporation (FCIC), operating through 

the Risk Management Agency (RMA), 

announces the availability of 

approximately $900,000 (subject to 

availability of funds) for Commodity 

Partnerships for Small Agricultural Risk 

Management Education Sessions (the 

Commodity Partnerships Small Sessions 

Program). The purpose of this 

cooperative partnership agreement 

program is to deliver training and 

information in the management of 

production, marketing, and financial 

risk to U.S. agricultural producers. The 

program gives priority to educating 

producers of crops currently not insured 

under Federal crop insurance, specialty 

crops, and underserved commodities, 

including livestock and forage. A 

maximum of 90 cooperative partnership 

agreements will be funded, with no 

more than nine in each of the ten 

designated RMA Regions. The 

maximum award for any cooperative 

partnership agreement will be $10,000. 

Awardees must demonstrate nonfinancial benefits from a cooperative 

partnership agreement and must agree 

to the substantial involvement of RMA 

in the project. Funding availability for 

this program may be announced at 

approximately the same time as funding 

availability for similar but separate 

programs—CFDA No. 10.455 

(Community Outreach and Assistance 

Partnerships), and CFDA No. 10.458 

(Crop Insurance Education in Targeted 

States). Prospective applicants should 

carefully examine and compare the 

notices for each program. 

The collections of information in this 

announcement have been approved by 

OMB under control number 0563–0067, 

and is currently at OMB for renewal. 

This announcement consists of eight 

sections: 

Section I—Funding Opportunity Description 

A. Legislative Authority 

B. Background 

C. Definition of Priority Commodities 

D. Project Goal 

E. Purpose 

Section II—Award Information 

A. Type of Award 

B. Funding Availability 

C. Location and Target Audience 

D. Maximum Award 

E. Project Period 

F. Description of Agreement—Awardee 

Tasks 

G. RMA Activities 

H. Other Tasks 

Section III—Eligibility Information 

A. Eligible Applicants 

B. Cost Sharing or Matching 

C. Other—Non-Financial Benefits 

Section IV—Application and Submission 

Information 

A. Contact To Request Application Package 

B. Content and Form of Application 

Submission 

C. Funding Restrictions 

D. Limitation on Use of Project Funds for 

Salaries and Benefits 

E. Indirect Cost Rates 

F. Other Submission Requirements 

G. Electronic Submissions 

H. Acknowledgement of Applications 

Section V—Application Review Information 

A. Criteria 

B. Selection and Review Process 

Section VI—Award Administration 

Information 

A. Award Notices 

B. Administrative and National Policy 

Requirements 

1. Requirement To Use Program Logo 

2. Requirement To Provide Project 

Information to an RMA-selected 

Representative 

3. Private Crop Insurance Organizations 

and Potential Conflicts of Interest 

4. Access to Panel Review Information 

5. Confidential Aspects of Applications 

and Awards 

6. Audit Requirements 

7. Prohibitions and Requirements 

Regarding Lobbying 

8. Applicable OMB Circulars 

9. Requirement To Assure Compliance 

With Federal Civil Rights Laws 

10. Requirement To Participate in a Post 

Award Teleconference 

11. Requirement To Submit Educational 

Materials to the National AgRisk 

Education Library 

12. Requirement To Submit Proposed 

Results to the National AgRisk Education 

Library 

13. Requirement To Submit a Project Plan 

of Operation in the Event of a Human 

Pandemic Outbreak 

C. Reporting Requirements 

Section VII—Agency Contact 

Section VIII—Additional Information 

A. Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal 

Numbering System (DUNS) 

B. Required Registration with the Central 

Contract Registry (CCR) for Submission 

of Proposals 

C. Related Programs 

Full Text of Announcement 

I. Funding Opportunity Description 

A. Legislative Authority 

The Commodity Partnerships Small 

Sessions Program is authorized under 

section 522(d)(3)(F) of the Federal Crop 

Insurance Act (Act) (7 U.S.C. 

1522(d)(3)(F)). 

B. Background 

RMA promotes and regulates sound 

risk management solutions to improve 

the economic stability of American 

agriculture. On behalf of FCIC, RMA 

does this by offering Federal crop 

insurance products through a network 

of private-sector partners, overseeing the 

creation of new risk management 

products, seeking enhancements in 

existing products, ensuring the integrity 

of crop insurance programs, offering 

outreach programs aimed at equal 

access and participation of underserved 

communities, and providing risk 

management education and information. 

One of RMA’s strategic goals is to 

ensure that its customers are well 

informed as to the risk management 

solutions available. This educational 

goal is supported by section 522(d)(3)(F) 

of the Act, which authorizes FCIC 

funding for risk management training 

and informational efforts for agricultural 

producers through the formation of 

partnerships with public and private 

organizations. With respect to such 

partnerships, priority is to be given to 

reaching producers of Priority 

Commodities, as defined below. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

13396 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 

C. Definition of Priority Commodities 

For purposes of this program, Priority 

Commodities are defined as: 

• Agricultural Commodities Covered 

by (7 U.S.C. 7333). Commodities in this 

group are commercial crops that are not 

covered by catastrophic risk protection 

crop insurance, are used for food or 

fiber (except livestock), and specifically 

include, but are not limited to, 

floricultural, ornamental nursery, 

Christmas trees, turf grass sod, 

aquaculture (including ornamental fish), 

and industrial crops. 

• Specialty Crops. Commodities in 

this group may or may not be covered 

under a Federal crop insurance plan and 

include, but are not limited to, fruits, 

vegetables, tree nuts, syrups, honey, 

roots, herbs, and highly specialized 

varieties of traditional crops. 

• Underserved Commodities. This 

group includes: (a) Commodities, 

including livestock and forage, that are 

covered by a Federal crop insurance 

plan but for which participation in an 

area is below the national average; and 

(b) commodities, including livestock 

and forage, with inadequate crop 

insurance coverage. 

A project is considered as giving 

priority to Priority Commodities if 75 

percent of the educational activities of 

the project are directed to producers of 

any of the three classes of commodities 

listed above or any combination of the 

three classes. 

D. Project Goal 

The goal of this program is to ensure 

that ‘‘* * * producers will be better 

able to use financial management, crop 

insurance, marketing contracts, and 

other existing and emerging risk 

management tools.’’ 

E. Purpose 

The purpose of the Commodity 

Partnership Small Session Program is to 

provide U.S. farmers and ranchers with 

training and informational opportunities 

to be able to understand: 

• The kinds of risks addressed by 

existing and emerging risk management 

tools; 

• The features and appropriate use of 

existing and emerging risk management 

tools; and 

• How to make sound risk 

management decisions. 

In addition, for 2009, the FCIC Board 

of Directors and the FCIC Manager are 

seeking projects that also include the 

Special Emphasis Topics listed below 

which highlight the educational 

priorities with each of the ten RMA 

Regional Offices: 

• Billings, Montana Regional Office 

(MT, ND, SD, and WY)—Pasture, 

Rangeland, Forage, Livestock Gross 

Margin, Specialty Crops, and 

Underserved Commodities 

• Davis, CA Regional Office (AZ, CA, 

HI, NV, and UT)—Actual Revenue 

History program for cherries in 

California, Hawaii Tropical Tree and 

Fruit Pilot Insurance programs (coffee, 

papaya and banana), AGR–Lite in 

Hawaii, Drought mitigation and lack of 

irrigation water, other applicable pilot 

state/county crop insurance pilot 

programs, and commodities uninsured 

by the crop insurance program 

• Jackson, MS Regional Office (AR, 

KY, LA, MS, and TN)—Nursery 

insurance tools (all states), AGR–Lite 

Insurance tools (TN) and Nursery Price 

Endorsement Crop Insurance (all states) 

• Oklahoma City, OK Regional Office 

(NM, OK, and TX)—Native American 

issues and, Limited English Proficiency. 

• Raleigh, NC Regional Office (CT, 

DE, MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, PA, 

RI, VA, VT, and WV). 

• Connecticut—LGM Dairy Cattle, 

Northern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• Delaware—LGM Dairy Cattle, 

Southern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• Maine—LGM Dairy Cattle, Northern 

Potatoes, and Nursery Insurance Tools. 

• Maryland—LGM Dairy Cattle, 

Southern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• Massachusetts—LGM Dairy Cattle, 

Northern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• New Hampshire—LGM Dairy Cattle 

and Nursery Insurance Tools. 

• New Jersey—LGM Dairy Cattle, 

Southern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• New York—Apiculture Vegetation 

Index, LGM Dairy Cattle, Pasture 

Rangeland Forage Vegetation Index, 

Northern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• North Carolina—Apiculture 

Vegetation Index, Pasture Rangeland 

Forage Vegetation Index, LRP for Feeder 

Cattle, Fed Cattle, Lamb, and Swine, 

Southern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• Pennsylvania—Apiculture Rainfall 

Index and Vegetation Index, LGM Dairy 

Cattle, Pasture Rangeland Forage 

Rainfall Index and Vegetation Index, 

Northern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• Rhode Island—LGM Dairy Cattle, 

Northern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools. 

• Virginia—Apiculture Vegetation 

Index, Pasture Rangeland Forage 

Vegetation Index, LRP for Feeder Cattle, 

Fed Cattle, Lamb, and Swine, Southern 

Potatoes, and Nursery Insurance Tools. 

• Vermont—LGM Dairy Cattle, 

Northern Potatoes, and Nursery 

Insurance Tools 

• West Virginia—LGM Dairy Cattle, 

and Nursery Insurance Tools. 

• Spokane, WA Regional Office (AK, 

ID, OR, and WA)—Yield and revenue 

crop insurance products (Actual 

Production History for Cherries, Crop 

Revenue Coverage, Income Protection, 

and Revenue Assurance) for small 

grains producers in Idaho, Oregon, and 

Washington; Potato and Sugar Beet 

insurance tools in Pacific Northwest 

growers. 

• Springfield, IL Regional Office (IL, 

IN, MI, and OH)—Processing Pumpkin 

Pilot Program, AGR–Lite, and ARH 

Cherries Pilot Program. 

• St. Paul, MN Regional Office (IA, 

MN, and WI)—AGR–Lite, understanding 

how Revenue Policies function and 

their relationship to marketing 

decisions. 

• Topeka, KS Regional Office (CO, 

KS, MO, and NE)—Pasture, Rangeland 

and Forage in states and counties with 

the program. 

• Valdosta, GA Regional Office (AL, 

FL, GA, SC, and Puerto Rico)—Pasture, 

Rangeland, and Forage/Apiculture. 

II. Award Information 

A. Type of Award 

Cooperative Partnership Agreements, 

which require the substantial 

involvement of RMA. 

B. Funding Availability 

Approximately $900,000 (subject to 

availability of funds) is available in 

fiscal year 2009 to fund up to 90 

cooperative partnership agreements. 

The maximum award for any agreement 

will be $10,000. It is anticipated that a 

maximum of nine agreements will be 

funded in each of the ten designated 

RMA Regions. 

In the event that all funds available 

for this program are not obligated after 

the maximum number of agreements are 

awarded or if additional funds become 

available, these funds may, at the 

discretion of the Manager of FCIC, be 

used to award additional applications 

that score highly by the technical review 

panel or allocated pro-rata to awardees 

for use in broadening the size or scope 

of awarded projects, if agreed to by the 

awardee. In the event that the Manager 

of FCIC determines that available RMA 

resources cannot support the 

administrative and substantial 

involvement requirements of all 

agreements recommended for funding, 

the Manager may elect to fund fewer 

agreements than the available funding 

might otherwise allow. It is expected 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 13397 

that the awards will be made 

approximately 120 days after the 

application deadline. All awards will be 

made and agreements finalized no later 

than September 30, 2009. 

C. Location and Target Audience 

RMA Regional Offices and the States 

serviced within each Region are listed 

below. Staff from the respective RMA 

Regional Offices will provide 

substantial involvement for projects 

conducted within the Region. 

Billings, MT Regional Office: (MT, 

ND, SD, and WY). 

Davis, CA Regional Office: (AZ, CA, 

HI, NV, and UT). 

Jackson, MS Regional Office: (AR, KY, 

LA, MS, and TN). 

Oklahoma City, OK Regional Office: 

(NM, OK, and TX). 

Raleigh, NC Regional Office: (CT, DE, 

MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, 

VA, VT, and WV). 

Spokane, WA Regional Office: (AK, 

ID, OR, and WA). 

Springfield, IL Regional Office: (IL, IN, 

MI, and OH). 

St. Paul, MN Regional Office: (IA, 

MN, and WI). 

Topeka, KS Regional Office: (CO, KS, 

MO, and NE). 

Valdosta, GA Regional Office: (AL, 

FL, GA, SC, and Puerto Rico). 

Applicants must clearly designate the 

RMA Region where educational 

activities will be conducted in their 

application narrative in block 12 of the 

SF–424 form. Applications without this 

designation will be rejected. Priority 

will be given to producers of Priority 

Commodities. Applicants proposing to 

conduct educational activities in more 

than one RMA Region must submit a 

separate application for each RMA 

Region. Single applications proposing to 

conduct educational activities in more 

than one RMA Region will be rejected. 

D. Maximum Award 

Any application that requests Federal 

funding of more than $10,000 for a 

project will be rejected. RMA also 

reserves the right to fund successful 

applications at an amount less than 

requested if it is judged that the 

application can be implemented at a 

lower funding level. 

E. Project Period 

Projects will be funded for a period of 

up to one year from the project starting 

date. 

F. Description of Agreement Award 

Awardee Tasks 

In conducting activities to achieve the 

purpose and goal of this program in a 

designated RMA Region, the awardee 

will be responsible for performing the 

following tasks: 

• Develop and conduct a promotional 

program. This program will include 

activities using media, newsletters, 

publications, or other appropriate 

informational dissemination techniques 

that are designed to: (a) Raise awareness 

for risk management; (b) inform 

producers of the availability of risk 

management tools; and (c) inform 

producers and agribusiness leaders in 

the designated RMA Region of training 

and informational opportunities. 

• Deliver risk management training 

and informational opportunities to 

agricultural producers and agribusiness 

professionals in the designated RMA 

Region. This will include organizing 

and delivering educational activities 

using the instructional materials that 

have been assembled to meet the local 

needs of agricultural producers. 

Activities should be directed primarily 

to agricultural producers, but may 

include those agribusiness professionals 

that have frequent opportunities to 

advise producers on risk management 

tools and decisions. 

• Document all educational activities 

conducted under the cooperative 

partnership agreement and the results of 

such activities, including criteria and 

indicators used to evaluate the success 

of the program. The awardee will also 

be required to provide information to an 

RMA-selected contractor to evaluate all 

educational activities and advise RMA 

as to the effectiveness of activities. 

G. RMA Activities 

FCIC, working through RMA, will be 

substantially involved during the 

performance of the funded project 

through RMA’s ten Regional Offices. 

Potential types of substantial 

involvement may include, but are not 

limited to the following activities. 

• Collaborate with the awardee in 

assembling, reviewing, and approving 

risk management materials for 

producers in the designated RMA 

Region. 

• Collaborate with the awardee in 

reviewing and approving a promotional 

program for raising awareness for risk 

management and for informing 

producers of training and informational 

opportunities in the RMA Region. 

• Collaborate with the awardee on the 

delivery of education to producers and 

agribusiness leaders in the RMA Region. 

This will include: (a) Reviewing and 

approving in advance all producer and 

agribusiness leader educational 

activities; (b) advising the project leader 

on technical issues related to crop 

insurance education and information; 

and (c) assisting the project leader in 

informing crop insurance professionals 

about educational activity plans and 

scheduled meetings. 

• Conduct an evaluation of the 

performance of the awardee in meeting 

the deliverables of the project. 

• Assist in the selection of 

subcontractors and project staff. 

Applications that do not contain 

substantial involvement by RMA will be 

rejected. 

H. Other Tasks 

In addition to the specific, required 

tasks listed above, the applicant may 

propose additional tasks that would 

contribute directly to the purpose of this 

program. For any proposed additional 

task, the applicant must identify the 

objective of the task, the specific 

subtasks required to meet the objective, 

specific time lines for performing the 

subtasks, and the specific 

responsibilities of partners. The 

applicant must also identify specific 

ways in which RMA would have 

substantial involvement in the proposed 

project task. 

III. Eligibility Information 

A. Eligible Applicants 

Eligible applicants include State 

departments of agriculture, universities, 

non-profit agricultural organizations, 

and other public or private 

organizations with the capacity to lead 

a local program of risk management 

education for farmers and ranchers in an 

RMA Region. Individuals are not 

eligible applicants. Although an 

applicant may be eligible to compete for 

an award based on its status as an 

eligible entity, other factors may 

exclude an applicant from receiving 

Federal assistance under this program 

governed by Federal law and regulations 

(e.g. debarment and suspension; a 

determination of non-performance on a 

prior contract, cooperative agreement, 

grant or cooperative partnership; a 

determination of a violation of 

applicable ethical standards; a 

determination of being considered ‘‘high 

risk’’). Applications from ineligible or 

excluded persons will be rejected in 

their entirety. 

B. Cost Sharing or Matching 

Although RMA prefers cost sharing by 

the applicant, this program has neither 

a cost sharing nor a matching 

requirement. 

C. Other—Non-Financial Benefits 

To be eligible, applicants must also be 

able to demonstrate that they will 

receive a non-financial benefit as a 

result of a cooperative partnership 

agreement. Non-financial benefits must 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

13398 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 

accrue to the applicant and must 

include more than the ability to provide 

employment income to the applicant or 

for the applicant’s employees or the 

community. The applicant must 

demonstrate that performance under the 

cooperative partnership agreement will 

further the specific mission of the 

applicant (such as providing research or 

activities necessary for graduate or other 

students to complete their educational 

program). Applications that do not 

demonstrate a non-financial benefit will 

be rejected. 

IV. Application and Submission 

Information 

A. Contact To Request Application 

Package 

Program application materials for the 

Commodity Partnerships Program under 

this announcement may be downloaded 

from http://www.rma.usda.gov/ 

aboutrma/agreements. Applicants may 

also request application materials from: 

Lydia M. Astorga, USDA–RMA–RME, 

phone: (202) 260–4728, fax: (202) 690– 

3605, e-mail: 

RMA.Risk-Ed@rma.usda.gov. 

B. Content and Form of Application 

Submission 

A complete and valid application 

must be submitted in one package at the 

time of initial submission, which must 

include the following: 

1. An original and two copies of the 

completed and signed application. 

2. A completed and signed OMB 

Standard Form 424, ‘‘Application for 

Federal Assistance.’’ 

3. A completed and signed OMB 

Standard Form 424–A, ‘‘Budget 

Information—Non-construction 

Programs.’’ Federal funding requested 

(the total of direct and indirect costs) 

must not exceed $10,000.00. 

4. A completed and signed OMB 

Standard Form 424–B, ‘‘Assurances, 

Non-constructive Programs.’’ 

5. An electronic copy (Microsoft Word 

format preferred) on a compact disk 

(CD) of the completed: 

a. ‘‘Written Narrative’’—no more than 

5 single-sided pages which will provide 

reviewers with sufficient information to 

effectively evaluate the merits of the 

application according to the evaluation 

criteria listed in this notice. Although a 

Statement of Work, which is the third 

evaluation criterion, is to be completed 

in detail in RMA 2 Form, applicants 

may wish to highlight certain unique 

features of the Statement of Work for the 

benefit of the evaluation panel. If your 

narrative exceeds the page limit, only 

the first 5 pages will be reviewed. 

• No smaller than 12 point font size. 

• Use an easily readable font face 

(e.g., Arial, Geneva, Helvetica, Times 

Roman). 

• 8.5 by 11 inch paper. 

• One-inch margins on each page. 

• Printed on only one side of paper. 

• Held together only by rubber bands 

or metal clips; not bound or stapled in 

any other way. 

b. ‘‘Budget Narrative,’’ describing how 

the categorical costs listed on SF 424– 

A are derived. The budget narrative 

should provide enough detail for 

reviewers to easily understand how 

costs were determined and how they 

relate to the goals and objectives of the 

project. 

c. ‘‘Statement of Non-financial 

Benefits.’’ (Refer to Section III, 

Eligibility Information, C. Other—Nonfinancial Benefits, above). 

d.‘‘Statement of Work,’’ RME 2 Form, 

which identifies tasks and subtasks in 

detail, expected completion dates and 

deliverables, and RMA’s substantial 

involvement role for the proposed 

project. 

6. A completed and signed OMB 

Standard Form LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of 

Lobbying Activities.’’ 

7. A completed and signed AD–1047, 

‘‘Certification Regarding Debarment, 

Suspension and Other Responsibility 

Matters—Primary Covered 

Transactions.’’ 

8. A completed and signed AD–1049, 

‘‘Certification Regarding Drug-Free 

Workplace.’’ 

Applications that do not include 

items 1–8 above will be considered 

incomplete, will not receive further 

consideration, and will be rejected. 

C. Funding Restrictions 

Cooperative partnership agreement 

funds may not be used to: 

a. Plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or 

construct a building or facility including 

a processing facility; 

b. Purchase, rent, or install fixed 

equipment; 

c. Repair or maintain privately owned 

vehicles; 

d. Pay for the preparation of the 

cooperative partnership agreement 

application; 

e. Fund political activities; 

f. Purchase alcohol, food, beverage or 

entertainment; 

g. Lend money to support farming or 

agricultural business operation or 

expansion; 

h. Pay costs incurred prior to 

receiving a partnership agreement; or 

i. Fund any activities prohibited in 7 

CFR Parts 3015 and 3019, as applicable. 

D. Limitation on Use of Project Funds 

for Salaries and Benefits 

Total costs for salary and benefits 

allowed for projects under this 

announcement will be limited to not 

more than 70 percent reimbursement of 

the funds awarded under the 

cooperative partnership agreement as 

indicated in Section III. Eligibility 

Information, C. Other—Non-financial 

Benefits. One goal of the Commodity 

Partnerships Small Sessions Program is 

to maximize the use of the limited 

funding available for risk management 

education for producers of Priority 

Commodities. In order to accomplish 

this goal, RMA needs to ensure that the 

maximum amount of funds practicable 

is used for directly providing the 

educational opportunities. Limiting the 

amount of funding for salaries and 

benefits will allow the limited amount 

of funding to reach the maximum 

number of farmers and ranchers. 

E. Indirect Cost Rates 

a. Indirect costs allowed for projects 

submitted under this announcement 

will be limited to ten (10) percent of the 

total direct cost of the cooperative 

partnership agreement. Therefore, when 

preparing budgets, applicants should 

limit their requests for recovery of 

indirect costs to the lesser of their 

institution’s official negotiated indirect 

cost rate or 10 percent of the total direct 

costs. 

b. RMA reserves the right to negotiate 

final budgets with successful applicants. 

c. Applicants may be required to 

provide a copy of their indirect cost rate 

negotiated with their cognizant agency. 

F. Other Submission Requirements 

Mailed Submissions: Applications 

submitted through express, overnight 

mail or another delivery service will be 

considered as meeting the announced 

deadline if they are received in the 

mailroom at the address stated below for 

express, overnight mail or another 

delivery service on or before the 

deadline. Applicants are cautioned that 

express, overnight mail or other delivery 

services do not always deliver as agreed. 

Applicants should take this into account 

because failure of such delivery services 

will not extend the deadline. Mailed 

applications will be considered as 

meeting the announced deadline if they 

are received on or before the deadline in 

the mailroom at the address stated 

below for mailed applications. 

Applicants using the U.S. Postal Service 

(USPS) should allow for the extra time 

for delivery due to the additional 

security measures that mail delivered to 

government offices in the Washington, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 13399 

DC area requires. USPS mail sent to 

Washington, DC headquarters is 

sanitized offsite, which may result in 

delays, loss, and physical damage to 

enclosures. 

Address when using private delivery 

services or when hand delivering: 

Attention: Risk Management Education 

Program, USDA/RMA/RME, Room 6709, 

South Building, 1400 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250. 

Address when using U.S. Postal 

Services: Attention: Risk Management 

Education Program, USDA/RMA/RME/ 

Stop 0808, Room 6709, South Building, 

1400 Independence Ave, SW., 

Washington, DC 20250–0808. 

Applicants are responsible for 

ensuring that RMA receives a complete 

application package by the closing date 

and time. Regardless of the delivery 

method you choose, please do so 

sufficiently in advance of the due date 

to ensure your application package is 

received on or before the deadline. Emailed and faxed applications will not 

be accepted. Application packages 

received after the deadline will not 

receive further consideration and will 

be rejected. 

G. Electronic Submissions 

Applications transmitted 

electronically via Grants.gov will be 

accepted prior to the application date or 

time deadline. The application package 

can be accessed via Grants.gov, go to 

http://www.grants.gov, click on ‘‘Find 

Grant Opportunities,’’ click on ‘‘Search 

Grant Opportunities,’’ and enter the 

CFDA number (beginning of the RFA) to 

search by CFDA number. From the 

search results, select the item that 

correlates to the title of this RFA. If you 

do not have electronic access to the RFA 

or have trouble downloading material 

and you would like a hardcopy, you 

may contact Lydia M. Astorga, USDA– 

RMA–RME, phone: (202) 260–4728, fax: 

(202) 690–3605, e-mail: 

RMA.Risk-Ed@rma.usda.gov. 

If assistance is needed to access the 

application package via Grants.gov (e.g., 

downloading or navigating PureEdge 

forms, using PureEdge with a Macintosh 

computer using Adobe), refer to 

resources available on the Grants.gov 

Web site first (http://www.grants.gov/). 

Grants.gov assistance is also available as 

follows: 

• Grants.gov Customer Support 

Toll Free: 1–800–518–4726. 

Business Hours: M–F 7 a.m.–9 p.m. 

Eastern Standard Time. 

E-mail: support@grants.gov. 

Applicants who submit their 

applications via the Grants.gov Web site 

are not required to submit any hard 

copy documents to RMA. 

When using Grants.gov to apply, RMA 

strongly recommends that you submit 

the online application at least two 

weeks prior to the application due date 

in case there are problems with the 

Grants.gov Web site and you want to 

submit your application via a mail 

delivery service. 

Electronic applications submitted 

through Grants.gov are due at 11:59 p.m. 

ET on the application deadline date. 

H. Acknowledgement of Applications 

Receipt of timely applications will be 

acknowledged by e-mail, whenever 

possible. Therefore, applicants are 

encouraged to provide e-mail addresses 

in their applications. If an e-mail 

address is not indicated on an 

application, timely receipt will be 

acknowledged by letter. There will be 

no notification of incomplete, 

unqualified or unfunded applications 

until after the awards have been made. 

When received by RMA, applications 

will be assigned an identification 

number. This number will be 

communicated to applicants in the 

acknowledgement of receipt of 

applications. An application’s 

identification number should be 

referenced in all correspondence 

regarding the application. If the 

applicant does not receive an 

acknowledgement within 15 days of the 

submission deadline, the applicant 

should notify RMA’s point of contact 

indicated in Section VII, Agency 

Contact. 

V. Application Review Information 

A. Criteria 

Applications submitted under the 

Commodity Partnerships Small Sessions 

Program will be evaluated within each 

RMA Region according to the following 

criteria: 

Project Impacts—Maximum 20 Points 

The applicant must demonstrate that 

the project benefits to farmers and 

ranchers warrant the funding requested. 

Applicants will be scored according to 

the extent they can: (a) Identify the 

specific actions producers will likely be 

able to take as a result of the educational 

activities described in the Statement of 

Work; (b) identify the specific measures 

for evaluating results that will be 

employed in the project; (c) reasonably 

estimate the total number of producers 

reached through the various methods 

and educational activities described in 

the Statement of Work; and (d) justify 

such estimates with clear specifics. 

Reviewers’ scoring will be based on the 

scope and reasonableness of the 

applicant’s clear descriptions of specific 

expected actions producers will 

accomplish, and well-designed methods 

for measuring the project’s results and 

effectiveness. Applicants using direct 

contact methods with producers will be 

scored higher. 

Statement of Work—Maximum 20 

Points 

The applicant must produce a clear 

and specific Statement of Work for the 

project. For each of the tasks contained 

in the Description of Agreement Award 

(refer to Section II Award Information), 

the applicant must identify and describe 

specific subtasks, responsible entities, 

expected completion dates, RMA 

substantial involvement, and 

deliverables that will further the 

purpose of this program. Applicants 

will be scored higher to the extent that 

the Statement of Work is specific, 

measurable, reasonable, has specific 

deadlines for the completion of 

subtasks, relates directly to the required 

activities and the program purpose 

described in this announcement, which 

is to provide producers with training 

and informational opportunities so that 

the producers will be better able to use 

financial management, crop insurance, 

marketing contracts, and other existing 

and emerging risk management tools. 

Applicants are required to submit this 

Statement of Work on Form RME–2 

Form. All narratives should give 

estimates of how many producers will 

be reached through this project. 

Estimates for non-producers can also be 

made but they should be separate from 

the estimate of producers. 

Project Management—Maximum 15 

Points 

The applicant must demonstrate an 

ability to implement sound and effective 

project management practices. Higher 

scores will be awarded to applicants 

that can demonstrate organizational 

skills, leadership, and experience in 

delivering services or programs that 

assist agricultural producers in the 

respective RMA Region. The project 

manager must demonstrate that he/she 

has the capability to accomplish the 

project goal and purpose stated in this 

announcement by (a) having a previous 

working relationship with the farm 

community in the designated RMA 

Region of the application, including 

being able to recruit approximately the 

number of producers to be reached in 

the application and/or (b) having 

established the capacity to partner with 

and gain the support of grower 

organizations, agribusiness 

professionals, and agribusiness leaders 

locally to aid in carrying out a program 

of education and information, including 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

13400 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 

being able to recruit approximately the 

number of producers to be reached in 

this application. Applicants are 

encouraged to designate an alternate 

Project Leader in the event the Project 

Leader is unable to finish the project. 

Applicants that will employ, or have 

access to, personnel who have 

experience in directing local 

educational programs that benefit 

agricultural producers in the respective 

RMA Region will receive higher 

rankings. 

Budget Appropriateness and 

Efficiency—Maximum 15 Points 

Applicants must provide a detailed 

budget summary that clearly explains 

and justifies costs associated with the 

project. Applicants will receive higher 

scores to the extent that they can 

demonstrate a fair and reasonable use of 

funds appropriate for the project and a 

budget that contains the estimated cost 

of reaching each individual producer. 

The applicant must provide information 

factors such as: 

• The allowability and necessity for 

individual cost categories; 

• The reasonableness of amounts 

estimated for necessary costs; 

• The basis used for allocating 

indirect or overhead costs; 

• The appropriateness of allocating 

particular overhead costs to the 

proposed project as direct costs; and 

• The percent of time devoted to the 

project for all key project personnel 

identified in the application. Salaries of 

project personnel should be requested 

in proportion to the percent of time that 

they would devote to the project and 

cannot exceed 70 percent of the total 

project budget. Applicants must list all 

current public or private support to 

which personnel identified in the 

application have committed portions of 

their time, whether or not salary support 

for persons involved is included in the 

budget. An application that duplicates 

or overlaps substantially with an 

application already reviewed and 

funded (or to be funded) by another 

organization or agency will not be 

funded under this program. The projects 

proposed for funding should be 

included in the pending section. Only 

items or services that are necessary for 

the successful completion of the project 

will be funded as permitted under the 

Act. 

Priority Commodity—Maximum 10 

Points 

The applicant can submit projects that 

are not related to Priority Commodities. 

However, priority will be given to 

projects relating to Priority 

Commodities and the degree in which 

such projects relate to the Priority 

Commodities. Projects that relate solely 

to Priority Commodities will be eligible 

for the most points. 

Past Performance—Maximum 10 Points 

If the applicant has been an awardee 

of other Federal or other government 

grants, cooperative agreements, or 

contracts in the past three years, the 

applicant must provide information 

relating to their past performance in 

reporting on outputs and outcomes 

under past or current Federal assistance 

agreements or contracts. The applicant 

must also detail that they have 

consistently complied with financial 

and program reporting and auditing 

requirements. RMA will review past 

performance reports during the review 

panel process. RMA reserves the right to 

add up to 10 points or subtract up to 10 

points from applications due to past 

performance. RMA has established 10 

evaluation standards from which your 

past performance scores is based upon. 

The 10 evaluation standards are 

demonstrated by: (1) Submitting all 

required documents (educational and 

promotional) to the RO for review prior 

to dissemination, (2) developing a 

training plan or accurate set of 

instructional materials, (3) delivering 

the materials to his/her intended 

audience as specified in the statement of 

work, (4) being able to draw at least 50 

percent of the audience estimated in the 

application, (5) developing a 

promotional plan or accurate set of 

promotional materials and properly 

promoting the program to his/her 

intended audience, (6) using the RMA 

logo when deemed appropriate, (7) 

participating in quarterly conference 

calls when asked, (8) notifying RO 

employees of when crop insurance and 

risk management education workshops 

and seminars are being held in their 

region in timely manner, (9) submitting 

complete quarterly reports by 

established deadlines, and (10) 

achieving the goals and objectives stated 

upfront in the statement of work. 

Applicants with very good past 

performance will receive a score from 

6–10 points. Very good past 

performance is designated by an 

agreement holder that meets the 10 

standards stated above from 70 percent 

to 100 percent of the time. Applicants 

with acceptable past performance will 

receive a score from 1–5 points when 

the 10 standards are met 40 percent to 

69 percent of the time. Applicants with 

unacceptable past performance will 

receive a score of zero to minus 10 

points when an applicant meets the 10 

standards less than 39 percent of the 

time. Applicants without relevant past 

performance information will receive a 

neutral score of the mean number of 

points of all applicants with past 

performance. These past performance 

points will be applied only to 

applications that the review panel 

scored above the minimum score. 

Applications receiving less than the 

minimum score required to be eligible 

for potential funding will not receive 

past performance points. 

Projected Audience Description— 

Maximum 5 Points 

The applicant must clearly identify 

and describe the targeted audience for 

the project. Applicants will receive 

higher scores to the extent that they can 

reasonably and clearly describe their 

target audience and why the audience 

would choose to participate in the 

project. The applicant must describe 

why the proposed audience wants the 

information the project will deliver and 

how they will benefit from it. 

B. Review and Selection Process 

Applications will be evaluated using 

a two-part process. First, each 

application will be screened by RMA 

personnel to ensure that it meets the 

requirements in this announcement. 

Applications that do not meet the 

requirements of this announcement or 

that are incomplete will not receive 

further consideration during the next 

process. Applications that meet 

announcement requirements will be 

sorted into the RMA Region in which 

the applicant proposes to conduct the 

project and will be presented to a 

review panel for consideration. 

Second, the review panel will meet to 

consider and discuss the merits of each 

application. The panel will consist of 

not less than three independent 

reviewers. Reviewers will be drawn 

from USDA, other Federal agencies, and 

others representing public and private 

organizations, as needed. After 

considering the merits of all 

applications within an RMA Region, 

panel members will score each 

application according to the criteria and 

point values listed above. The panel 

will then rank each application against 

others within the RMA Region 

according to the scores received. A 

lottery will be used to resolve any 

instances of a tie score that might have 

a bearing on funding recommendations. 

If such a lottery is required, the names 

of all tied applicants will be entered 

into a drawing. The first tied applicant 

drawn will have priority over other tied 

applicants for funding consideration. 

The review panel will report the 

results of the evaluation to the Manager 

of FCIC. The panel’s report will include 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 13401 

the recommended applicants to receive 

cooperative partnership agreements for 

each RMA Region. Funding will not be 

provided for an application receiving a 

score less than 45. Funding will not be 

provided for an application that is 

highly similar to a higher-scoring 

application in the same RMA Region. 

Highly similar is one that proposes to 

reach the same producers likely to be 

reached by another applicant that 

scored higher by the panel and the same 

general educational material is proposed 

to be delivered. 

An organization, or group of 

organizations in partnership, may apply 

for funding under other FCIC or RMA 

programs, in addition to the program 

described in this announcement. 

However, if the Manager of FCIC 

determines that an application 

recommended for funding is sufficiently 

similar to a project that has been funded 

or has been recommended to be funded 

under another RMA or FCIC program, 

then the Manager may elect not to fund 

that application in whole or in part. The 

Manager of FCIC will make the final 

determination on those applications that 

will be awarded funding. 

VI. Award Administration Information 

A. Award Notices 

Following approval by the awarding 

official of RMA of the applications to be 

selected for funding, project leaders 

whose applications have been selected 

for funding will be notified. Within the 

limit of funds available for such a 

purpose, the awarding official of RMA 

shall enter into cooperative partnership 

agreements with those selected 

applicants. The agreements provide the 

amount of Federal funds for use in the 

project period, the terms, and 

conditions of the award, and the time 

period for the project. The effective date 

of the agreement shall be on the date the 

agreement is executed by both parties 

and it shall remain in effect for up to 

one year or through September 30, 2010, 

whichever is later. 

After a partnership agreement has 

been signed, RMA will extend to 

awardees, in writing, the authority to 

draw down funds for the purpose of 

conducting the activities listed in the 

agreement. All funds provided to the 

applicant by FCIC must be expended 

solely for the purpose for which the 

funds are obligated in accordance with 

the approved agreement and budget, the 

regulations, the terms and conditions of 

the award, and the applicability of 

Federal cost principles. No commitment 

of Federal assistance beyond the project 

period is made or implied for any award 

resulting from this notice. 

Notification of denial of funding will 

be sent to applicants after final funding 

decisions have been made and the 

awardees announced publicly. Reasons 

for denial of funding can include, but 

are not limited to, incomplete 

applications, applications with 

evaluation scores that are lower that 

other applications in an RMA Region, or 

applications that are highly similar to a 

higher-scoring application in the same 

RMA Region. Highly similar is an 

application that proposes to reach the 

same producers likely to be reached by 

another applicant that scored higher by 

the panel and the same general 

educational material is proposed to be 

delivered. 

B. Administrative and National Policy 

Requirements 

1. Requirement To Use Program Logo 

Applicants awarded cooperative 

partnership agreements will be required 

to use a program logo and design 

provided by RMA for all instructional 

and promotional materials, when 

deemed appropriate. 

2. Requirement To Provide Project 

Information to an RMA-Selected 

Representative 

Applicants awarded cooperative 

partnership agreements may be required 

to assist RMA in evaluating the 

effectiveness of its educational programs 

by providing documentation of 

educational activities and related 

information to any representative 

selected by RMA for program evaluation 

purposes. 

3. Private Crop Insurance Organizations 

and Potential Conflicts of Interest 

Private organizations that are 

involved in the sale of Federal crop 

insurance, or that have financial ties to 

such organizations, are eligible to apply 

for funding under this announcement. 

However, such entities will not be 

allowed to receive funding to conduct 

activities that would otherwise be 

required under a Standard Reinsurance 

Agreement or any other agreement in 

effect between FCIC and the entity. 

Also, such entities will not be allowed 

to receive funding to conduct activities 

that could be perceived by producers as 

promoting one company’s services or 

products over another’s. If applying for 

funding, such organizations are 

encouraged to be sensitive to potential 

conflicts of interest and to describe in 

their application the specific actions 

they will take to avoid actual and 

perceived conflicts of interest. 

4. Access to Panel Review Information 

Upon written request from the 

applicant, scores from the evaluation 

panel, not including the identity of 

reviewers, will be sent to the applicant 

after the review and awards process has 

been completed. 

5. Confidential Aspects of Applications 

and Awards 

The names of applicants, the names of 

individuals identified in the 

applications, the content of 

applications, and the panel evaluations 

of applications will all be kept 

confidential, except to those involved in 

the review process, to the extent 

permitted by law. In addition, the 

identities of review panel members will 

remain confidential throughout the 

entire review process and will not be 

released to applicants. At the end of the 

fiscal year, names of panel members 

will be made available. However, 

panelists will not be identified with the 

review of any particular application. 

When an application results in a 

partnership agreement, that agreement 

becomes a part of the official record of 

RMA transactions, available to the 

public upon specific request. 

Information that the Secretary of 

Agriculture determines to be of a 

confidential, privileged, or proprietary 

nature will be held in confidence to the 

extent permitted by law. Therefore, any 

information that the applicant wishes to 

be considered confidential, privileged, 

or proprietary should be clearly marked 

within an application, including the 

basis for such designation. The original 

copy of an application that does not 

result in an award will be retained by 

RMA for a period of one year. Other 

copies will be destroyed. Copies of 

applications not receiving awards will 

be released only with the express 

written consent of the applicant or to 

the extent required by law. An 

application may be withdrawn at any 

time prior to award. 

6. Audit Requirements 

Applicants awarded cooperative 

partnership agreements are subject to 

audit. 

7. Prohibitions and Requirements With 

Regard to Lobbying 

Section 1352 of Public Law 101–121, 

enacted on October 23, 1989, imposes 

prohibitions and requirements for 

disclosure and certification related to 

lobbying on awardees of Federal 

contracts, grants, cooperative 

agreements, and loans. It provides 

exemptions for Indian Tribes and Tribal 

organizations. Current and prospective 

awardees, and any subcontractors, are 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

13402 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 

prohibited from using Federal funds, 

other than profits from a Federal 

contract, for lobbying Congress or any 

Federal agency in connection with the 

award of a contract, grant, cooperative 

agreement, or loan. In addition, for each 

award action in excess of $100,000 

($150,000 for loans) the law requires 

awardees and any subcontractors: (1) To 

certify that they have neither used nor 

will use any appropriated funds for 

payment of lobbyists; (2) to disclose the 

name, address, payment details, and 

purpose of any agreements with 

lobbyists whom awardees of their 

subcontractors will pay with profits or 

other non-appropriated funds on or after 

December 22, 1989; and (3) to file 

quarterly up-dates about the use of 

lobbyists if material changes occur in 

their use. The law establishes civil 

penalties for non-compliance. A copy of 

the certification and disclosure forms 

must be submitted with the application, 

are available at the address, and 

telephone number listed in Section VII. 

Agency Contact. 

8. Applicable OMB Circulars 

All partnership agreements funded as 

a result of this notice will be subject to 

the requirements contained in all 

applicable OMB circulars. 

9. Requirement To Assure Compliance 

With Federal Civil Rights Laws 

Awardees of all cooperative 

partnership agreements funded as a 

result of this notice are required to 

know and abide by Federal civil rights 

laws and to assure USDA and RMA that 

the awardee is in compliance with and 

will continue to comply with Title VI of 

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 

2000d et seq.), 7 CFR part 15, and USDA 

regulations promulgated thereunder, 7 

CFR 1901.202. RMA requires awardees 

to submit an Assurance Agreement 

(Civil Rights), assuring RMA of this 

compliance prior to the beginning of the 

project period. 

10. Requirement To Participate in a Post 

Award Teleconference 

RMA requires that project leaders 

participate in a post award 

teleconference, if conducted to become 

fully aware of agreement requirements 

and for delineating the roles of RMA 

personnel and the procedures that will 

be followed in administering the 

agreement and will afford an 

opportunity for the orderly transition of 

agreement duties and obligations if 

different personnel are to assume postaward responsibility. 

11. Requirement To Submit Educational 

Materials to the National AgRisk 

Education Library 

RMA requires that project leaders 

upload digital copies of all risk 

management educational materials 

developed because of the project to the 

National AgRisk Education Library 

(http://www.agrisk.umn.edu/) for 

posting, if electronically reporting. RMA 

will be clearly identified as having 

provided funding for the materials. 

Projects leaders not reporting 

electronically will not be required to 

post educational materials onto the 

National AgRisk Education Library, but 

are highly encouraged to do so. 

12. Requirement To Submit Proposed 

Results to the National AgRisk 

Education Library 

RMA requires that project leaders 

submit results of the project to the 

National AgRisk Education Library 

(http://www.agrisk.umn.edu/) for 

posting if electronically reporting. 

Projects leaders not reporting 

electronically will not be required to 

post results onto the National AgRisk 

Education Library, but are highly 

encouraged to do so. 

13. Requirement To Submit a Project 

Plan of Operation in the Event of a 

Human Pandemic Outbreak 

RMA requires that project leaders 

submit a project plan of operation in 

case of a human pandemic event. The 

plan should address the concept of 

continuing operations as they relate to 

the project. This should include the 

roles, responsibilities, and contact 

information for the project team and 

individuals serving as back-ups in case 

of a pandemic outbreak. 

C. Reporting Requirements 

Awardees will be required to submit 

quarterly progress reports, quarterly 

financial reports (OMB Standard Form 

269), and quarterly Activity Logs (Form 

RMA–300) throughout the project 

period, as well as a final program and 

financial report not later than 90 days 

after the end of the project period. 

Awardees will be required to submit 

prior to the award: 

• A completed and signed Assurance 

Agreement (Civil Rights). 

• A completed and signed FaithBased Survey on EEO. 

VII. Agency Contact 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Applicants and other interested parties 

are encouraged to contact: Lydia M. 

Astorga, USDA–RMA–RME, phone: 

202–260–4728, fax: 202–690–3605, email: RMA.Risk-Ed@rma.usda.gov. You 

may also obtain information regarding 

this announcement from the RMA Web 

site at: http://www.rma.usda.gov/ 

aboutrma/agreements. 

VIII. Other Information 

A. Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal 

Numbering System (DUNS) 

A DUNS number is a unique ninedigit sequence recognized as the 

universal standard for identifying and 

keeping track of over 70 million 

businesses worldwide. The Office of 

Management and Budget published a 

notice of final policy issuance in the 

Federal Register June 27, 2003 (68 FR 

38402) that requires a DUNS number in 

every application (i.e., hard copy and 

electronic) for a grant or cooperative 

agreement on or after October 1, 2003. 

Therefore, potential applicants should 

verify that they have a DUNS number or 

take the steps needed to obtain one. For 

information about how to obtain a 

DUNS number, go to http:// 

www.grants.gov. Please note that the 

registration may take up to 14 business 

days to complete. 

B. Required Registration With the 

Central Contract Registry (CCR) for 

Submission of Proposals 

The Central Contract Registry (CCR) is 

a database that serves as the primary 

Government repository for contractor 

information required for the conduct of 

business with the Government. This 

database will also be used as a central 

location for maintaining organizational 

information for organizations seeking 

and receiving grants from the 

Government. Such organizations must 

register in the CCR prior to the 

submission of applications. A DUNS 

number is needed for CCR registration. 

For information about how to register in 

the CCR, visit ‘‘Get Started’’ at the Web 

site, http://www.grants.gov. Allow a 

minimum of 5 business days to 

complete the CCR registration. 

C. Related Programs 

Funding availability for this program 

may be announced at approximately the 

same time as funding availability for 

similar but separate programs—CFDA 

No. 10.455 (Community Outreach and 

Assistance Partnerships), and CFDA No. 

10.458 (Crop Insurance Education in 

Targeted States). These programs have 

some similarities, but also key 

differences. The differences stem from 

important features of each program’s 

authorizing legislation and different 

RMA objectives. Prospective applicants 

should carefully examine and compare 

the notices for each program. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices 13403 

Signed in Washington, DC on March 23, 

2009. 

William J. Murphy, 

Acting Manager, Federal Crop Insurance 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. E9–6822 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation 

Funding Opportunity Title: Crop 

Insurance Education in Targeted 

States (Targeted States Program) 

Announcement Type: Announcement 

of availability of funds and request for 

application for competitive cooperative 

agreements. 

Catalog of Federal Domestic 

Assistance Number (CFDA): 10.458. 

DATES: Hard copy applications are due 

5 p.m. EST, May 11, 2009. Electronic 

applications submitted through 

Grants.gov are due 11:59 p.m. EST, May 

11, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance 

Corporation (FCIC), operating through 

the Risk Management Agency (RMA), 

announces the availability of 

approximately $4.5 million (subject to 

availability of funds) to fund 

cooperative agreements under the Crop 

Insurance Education in Targeted States 

program (the Targeted States Program). 

The purpose of this cooperative 

agreement program is to deliver crop 

insurance education and information to 

U.S. agricultural producers in certain 

States that have been designated as 

historically underserved with respect to 

crop insurance. The states, collectively 

referred to as Targeted States, are 

Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, 

Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New 

Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, 

Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, 

Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming. 

A maximum of 16 cooperative 

agreements will be funded, one in each 

of the 16 Targeted States. Awardees 

must agree to the substantial 

involvement of RMA in the project. 

Funding availability for this program 

may be announced at approximately the 

same time as funding availability for 

similar but separate programs—CFDA 

No. 10.455 (Community Outreach and 

Assistance Partnerships), CFDA No. 

10.457 (Commodity Partnerships for 

Risk Management Education), and 

CFDA No. 10.459 (Commodity 

Partnerships for Small Agricultural Risk 

Management Education Sessions). 

Prospective applicants should carefully 

examine and compare the notices for 

each program. 

The collections of information in this 

announcement have been approved by 

OMB under control number 0563–0067, 

and is currently at OMB for renewal. 

This Announcement Consists of Eight 

Sections: 

Section I—Funding Opportunity Description 

A. Legislative Authority 

B. Background 

C. Project Goal 

D. Purpose 

Section II—Award Information 

A. Type of Award 

B. Funding Availability 

C. Location and Target Audience 

D. Maximum Award 

E. Project Period 

F. Description of Agreement Award— 

Awardee Tasks 

G. RMA Activities 

H. Other Tasks 

Section III—Eligibility Information 

A. Eligible Applicants 

B. Cost Sharing or Matching 

Section IV—Application and Submission 

Information 

A. Contact To Request Application Package 

B. Content and Form of Application 

Submission 

C. Funding Restrictions 

D. Limitation on Use of Project Funds for 

Salaries and Benefits 

E. Indirect Cost Rates 

F. Other Submission Requirements 

G. Electronic Submissions 

H. Acknowledgement of Applications 

Section V—Application Review Process 

A. Criteria 

B. Selection and Review Process 

Section VI—Award Administration 

Information 

A. Award Notices 

B. Administrative and National Policy 

Requirements 

1. Requirement To Use Program Logo 

2. Requirement To Provide Project 

Information to an RMA-selected 

Representative 

3. Private Crop Insurance Organizations 

and Potential Conflict of Interest 

4. Access to Panel Review Information 

5. Confidential Aspects of Applications 

and Awards 

6. Audit Requirements 

7. Prohibitions and Requirements 

Regarding Lobbying 

8. Applicable OMB Circulars 

9. Requirement To Assure Compliance 

with Federal Civil Rights Laws 

10. Requirement To Participate in a Post 

Award Conference 

11. Requirement To Submit Educational 

Materials to the National AgRisk 

Education Library 

12. Requirement To Submit Proposed 

Results to the National AgRisk Education 

Library 

13. Requirement To Submit a Project Plan 

of Operation in the Event of a Human 

Pandemic Outbreak 

C. Reporting Requirements 

Section VII—Agency Contact 

Section VIII—Additional Information 

A. Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal 

Numbering System (DUNS) 

B. Required Registration With the Central 

Contract Registry (CCR) for Submission 

of Proposals 

C. Related Programs 

Full Text of Announcement 

I. Funding Opportunity Description 

A. Legislative Authority 

The Targeted States Program is 

authorized under section 524(a)(2) of 

the Federal Crop Insurance Act (Act). 

B. Background 

RMA promotes and regulates sound 

risk management solutions to improve 

the economic stability of American 

agriculture. On behalf of FCIC, RMA 

does this by offering Federal crop 

insurance products through a network 

of private-sector partners, overseeing the 

creation of new risk management 

products, seeking enhancements in 

existing products, ensuring the integrity 

of crop insurance programs, offering 

outreach programs aimed at equal 

access and participation of underserved 

communities, and providing risk 

management education and information. 

One of RMA’s strategic goals is to 

ensure that its customers are well 

informed of risk management solutions 

available. This educational goal is 

supported by section 524(a)(2) of the 

Act. This section authorizes funding for 

the establishment of crop insurance 

education and information programs in 

States that have historically been 

underserved by the Federal crop 

insurance program. In accordance with 

the Act, the sixteen States designated as 

‘‘underserved’’ are Connecticut, 

Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, 

Massachusetts, Nevada, New 

Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, 

Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, 

Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming 

(collectively referred to as ‘‘Targeted 

States’’). Hawaii was added this fiscal 

year when Congress authorized the 2008 

Farm Bill. 

C. Project Goal 

The goal of the Targeted States 

Program is to ensure that farmers and 

ranchers in the Targeted States are 

sufficiently informed so as to take full 

advantage of existing and emerging crop 

insurance products. In carrying out the 

programs established under the Food, 

Conservation, And Energy Act of 2008, 

the Secretary of Agriculture has placed 

special emphasis on risk management 

strategies, education, and outreach 

specifically targeted at— 

(A) Beginning farmers or ranchers; 

(B) legal immigrant farmers or 

ranchers who are attempting to become 

established producers in the United 

States; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES