13190 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices 

parties within the 30–day period 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 

The Department received no substantive 

responses from any respondent 

interested parties. As a result, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department is 

conducting expedited (120–day) sunset 

reviews of the antidumping duty 

finding/orders on PC strand from Brazil, 

India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and 

Thailand. 

Scope of the Finding/Orders 

The product covered in the sunset 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

on PC strand from Brazil, India, Korea, 

Mexico, and Thailand is steel strand 

produced from wire of non–stainless, 

non–galvanized steel, which is suitable 

for use in prestressed concrete (both 

pre–tensioned and post–tensioned) 

applications. The product definition 

encompasses covered and uncovered 

strand and all types, grades, and 

diameters of PC strand. 

The product covered in the sunset 

review of the antidumping duty finding 

on PC strand from Japan is steel wire 

strand, other than alloy steel, not 

galvanized, which is stress–relieved and 

suitable for use in prestressed concrete. 

The merchandise subject to the 

finding/orders is currently classifiable 

under subheadings 7312.10.3010 and 

7312.10.3012 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise under the finding/orders is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in these reviews are 

addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset 

Reviews of the Antidumping Duty 

Finding/Orders on Prestressed Concrete 

Steel Wire Strand from Brazil, India, 

Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, 

and Thailand’’ from Acting Deputy 

Assistant Secretary John M. Andersen to 

Acting Assistant Secretary Ronald K. 

Lorentzen dated March 19, 2009 

(Decision Memo), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. The issues 

discussed in the Decision Memo include 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail if the finding/orders were 

revoked. Parties can find a complete 

discussion of all issues raised in these 

reviews and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum which is on file in the 

Central Records Unit, room 1117 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. 

The paper copy and electronic version 

of the Decision Memo are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Reviews 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty finding/orders on PC 

strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Mexico, 

Korea, and Thailand would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the following weighted– 

average percentage margins: 

Country Company Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

Brazil ............................................................................................ Belgo Bekaert Arames S.A. 118.75 

...................................................................................................... All Others 118.75 

India ............................................................................................. Tata Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. 102.07 

...................................................................................................... All Others 83.65 

Japan ........................................................................................... Shinko Wire Co., Ltd. 13.30 

...................................................................................................... Suzuki Metal Industry Co., Ltd. 6.90 

...................................................................................................... Tokyo Rope Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 4.50 

...................................................................................................... All Others 9.76 

Korea ........................................................................................... Dong–Il Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 54.19 

...................................................................................................... Kiswire Ltd. 54.19 

...................................................................................................... All Others 35.64 

Mexico .......................................................................................... Aceros Camesa S.A. de C.V. 62.78 

...................................................................................................... Cablesa S.A. de C.V. 77.20 

...................................................................................................... All Others 62.78 

Thailand ....................................................................................... Siam Industrial Wire Co., Ltd. 12.91 

...................................................................................................... All Others 12.91 

Notification Regarding APO 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 19, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–6797 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–427–801, A–428–801, A–475–801, A–588– 

804, A–412–801 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the 

United Kingdom: Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 1, 2008, in response 

to requests from interested parties, the 

Department of Commerce published a 

notice of initiation of the administrative 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices 13191 

on ball bearings and parts thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the 

United Kingdom. The period of review 

is May 1, 2007, through April 30, 2008. 

The Department of Commerce is 

rescinding these reviews in part. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 26, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Yang Jin 

Chun or Richard Rimlinger, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5760 and (202) 

482–4477, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2008, in response to 

requests from interested parties, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published a notice of 

initiation of the administrative reviews 

of the antidumping duty orders on ball 

bearings and parts thereof from France, 

Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 73 FR 37409 (July 1, 2008). 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d), the Department will rescind 

an administrative review in part ‘‘if a 

party that requested a review withdraws 

the request within 90 days of the date 

of the publication of notice of initiation 

of the requested review.’’ In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department may extend the 90–day time 

limit if the Department ‘‘decides that it 

is reasonable to do so.’’ On October 3, 

2008, for all interested parties which 

requested the administrative reviews of 

the antidumping duty orders on ball 

bearings and parts thereof from Japan 

and the United Kingdom, we extended 

the due date for withdrawing the 

requests for reviews to October 10, 2008, 

because all respondents that we selected 

for individual examination in these two 

reviews had withdrawn their requests 

for reviews in a timely manner and 

because we had to identify additional 

respondents for individual examination. 

On October 14, 2008, for Canon, Inc., we 

extended the due date for withdrawing 

the request for review to October 15, 

2008, based on the circumstances stated 

in Canon, Inc.’s October 14, 2008, letter 

requesting an extension of the due date. 

Subsequent to the initiation of these 

reviews, we received timely 

withdrawals of the requests we had 

received for the reviews as follows: 

Country Company 

France .............................................................................................................................. ADR S.A.1

Germany .......................................................................................................................... Dolmar GmbH1

.......................................................................................................................................... SNR Walzlager GmbH1

Italy .................................................................................................................................. Edwards, Ltd., and Edwards High Vacuum Int’l Ltd.1

Japan ............................................................................................................................... Aisin Seiki Company Ltd.1

.......................................................................................................................................... Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd.1

.......................................................................................................................................... Canon, Inc.2

.......................................................................................................................................... JTEKT Corporation1

.......................................................................................................................................... Keihin Corporation3

.......................................................................................................................................... Makino Milling Machine Company Ltd.3

.......................................................................................................................................... Makita Corporation3

.......................................................................................................................................... Mazda Motor Corporation3

.......................................................................................................................................... Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.1

.......................................................................................................................................... Nachi–Fujikoshi Corporation1

.......................................................................................................................................... Nippon Pillow Block Company Limited1

.......................................................................................................................................... Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.3

.......................................................................................................................................... NSK, Ltd.1

.......................................................................................................................................... NTN Corporation1

.......................................................................................................................................... Univance Inc.3

.......................................................................................................................................... Yamazaki Mazak Trading Corporation1

United Kingdom ............................................................................................................... Edwards, Ltd., and Edwards High Vacuum Int’l Ltd.1

.......................................................................................................................................... NSK Bearings Europe Ltd.1

.......................................................................................................................................... Rolls–Royce PLC1

1We received timely withdrawals of the requests for reviews of these companies on or before September 29, 2008, which was the last day of 

the regulatory 90-day period in which interested parties could withdraw a request for review. 2We received a timely withdrawal of the request for review of Canon, Inc., on October 15, 2008. 

3We received timely withdrawals of the requests for reviews of these companies between October 8, 2008, and October 10, 2008. 

Because there are no other requests 

for review of the above–named firms, 

we are rescinding the reviews with 

respect to these companies in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d). We 

also received a timely withdrawal of the 

request we received for Sapporo 

Precision, Inc. (Sapporo), with respect 

to the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on ball bearings 

and parts thereof from Japan. A review 

of Sapporo was also requested by 

another interested party which has not 

withdrawn its request. Consequently, 

we continue to conduct the 

administrative review of Sapporo. 

Rescission of Reviews 

The Department received the timely 

submitted letters withdrawing the 

requests for the reviews of the 

companies listed above within the 90– 

day period or within the specific 

extended due dates. The Department 

received no other requests for the 

reviews of these companies. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is 

rescinding the reviews in part with 

respect to ball bearings and parts thereof 

produced and/or exported by the 

companies as stated above. The 

Department intends to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection 15 days after 

publication of this notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s assumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and subsequent assessment of 

double antidumping duties. 

13192 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices 

Notification Regarding APO 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

rescissions in part in accordance with 

section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: March 19, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–6800 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

University of Colorado, et al.; Notice of 

Consolidated Decision on Applications 

for Duty–Free Entry of Electron 

Microscopes 

This is a decision consolidated 

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 

Related records can be viewed between 

8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 3705, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington, 

D.C. 

Docket Number: 08–041. Applicant: 

University of Colorado, Denver, CO 

80217. Instrument: Vitrification Robot. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, The 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

74 FR 7394, February 17, 2009. 

Docket Number: 08–052. Applicant: 

University of Washington, Seattle, WA 

98105–6698. Instrument: CTD Chain III. 

Manufacturer: ADM Electronik, 

Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 74 

FR 7395, February 17, 2009. 

Docket Number: 08–056. Applicant: 

Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, 

IL 60439. Instrument: Isobar Separator 

System. Manufacturer: Bruker Biospin 

S.A., France. Intended Use: See notice at 

74 FR 7395, February 17, 2009. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. No instrument of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instrument, for such purposes as these 

instruments are intended to be used, 

was being manufactured in the United 

States at the time the instruments were 

ordered. Reasons: Each foreign 

instrument is an electron microscope 

and is intended for research or scientific 

educational uses requiring an electron 

microscope. We know of no electron 

microscope, or any other instrument 

suited to these purposes, which was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order of each instrument. 

Dated: March 19, 2009. 

Chris Cassel, 

Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement 

Office, Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–6799 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

University of Colorado, et al.; Notice of 

Consolidated Decision on Applications 

for Duty-Free Entry of Electron 

Microscopes 

This is a decision consolidated 

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 

Related records can be viewed between 

8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 3705, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC. 

Docket Number: 08–050. Applicant: 

University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 

80309–0427. Instrument: Dual Beam FIB 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, Czech Republic. Intended 

Use: See notice at 74 FR 7588, February 

18, 2009. 

Docket Number: 08–051. Applicant: 

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, The 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

74 FR 7588, February 18, 2009. 

Docket Number: 08–062. Applicant: 

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 

PA 15213. Instrument: Scanning 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, The Netherlands. Intended 

Use: See notice at 74 FR 7588, February 

18, 2009. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. No instrument of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instrument, for such purposes as these 

instruments are intended to be used, 

was being manufactured in the United 

States at the time the instruments were 

ordered. Reasons: Each foreign 

instrument is an electron microscope 

and is intended for research or scientific 

educational uses requiring an electron 

microscope. We know of no electron 

microscope, or any other instrument 

suited to these purposes, which was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order of each instrument. 

Dated: March 19, 2009. 

Chris Cassel, 

Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement 

Office, Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–6798 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XO24 

Endangered and Threatened Species; 

Take of Anadromous Fish 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of receipt of a permit 

application; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

NMFS has received an application for a 

permit (permit 14579) to conduct 

steelhead rescue activities for 

population enhancement purposes from 

the Protected Resource Division of 

NMFS office in Long Beach (PRDLB), 

California. The requested permit would 

affect the Southern California Coast 

Distinct Population Segment of 

endangered steelhead trout 

(Oncorhynchus mykiss). The public is 

hereby notified of the availability of the 

permit application for review and 

comment before NMFS either approves 

or disapproves the application. 

DATES: Written comments on the permit 

application must be received at the 

appropriate address or fax number (see 

ADDRESSES) on or before April 27, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the 

permit application should be sent to 

Matt McGoogan, Protected Resources 

Division, NMFS, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., 

Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802. 

Comments may also be sent using email 

(FRNpermits.lb@noaa.gov) or fax (562) 

980–4027. The permit application is 

available for review, by appointment, at 

the foregoing address and is also 

available for review online at the 

Authorizations and Permits for