alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL09-42-000]


Dartmouth Power Associates, Limited Partnership, Complainant v. 
ISO New England Inc., Respondent; Notice of Complaint

March 20, 2009.
    Take notice that on March 20, 2009, pursuant to section 206 of the 
Rules and Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206, Dartmouth Power 
Associates Limited Partnership (Complainant) filed a formal complaint 
against ISO New England Inc. (Respondent) as an appeal of the 
Respondent's denial of Complainant's Requested Billing Adjustment on 
February 20, 2009, which relates to the Respondent's revocation of 
Complainant's June 2008 Installed Capacity Payments.
    The Complainant certifies that a copy of the complaint has been 
served on the Respondent.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#02444750414d6c6e6b6c67517772726d707642646770612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d5b584f5e5273717473784e686d6d726f695d7b786f7e337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 9, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-6868 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FIRENZE 10560 LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. AG RESOLUTIONS, LLC, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1489

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Marlon M. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2217

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 30, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
#### In the Matter of Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent, v Michelle Allen et al., Respondents, Salvation Army, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 601]

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the additional respondent Salvation Army appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.H.O.), dated February 4, 2000, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless the court’s conclusions could not be reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially in cases resting in large part on the credibility of witnesses *(see, Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Mucerino,*275 AD2d 464; *Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v McMahon,*251 AD2d 571, 572). *577Here, a review of the record supports the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the appellant’s vehicle was involved in the accident at issue. Since there was no dispute that the appellant’s vehicle was insured, the petition to stay arbitration was properly granted. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 3, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service ® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 411 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-106, CP2018-148.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-28368 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX PARTE David Lewis FIFER

CR-16-0079

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 14-1846

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Michael D. McBride lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin

____________ Submitted: September 3, 2014 Filed: September 23, 2014 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Michael McBride directly appeals afte r he pled guilty to a child-pornography charge under a Federal Rule of Crimin al Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreementcontaining an appeal waiver, and the district court 1 sentenced him in accordance with the plea agreement to the statutory minimum term of imprisonment. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging McBride’s sentence. In addition, counsel seeks leave to withdraw. After careful de novo review, we en force the appeal waiver. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (e n banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where it falls w ithin scope of waiver , plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result); see also United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of a ppeal waiver). First, we conclude that counsel’s challenge to McBride’s statutory minimum sentence falls within the scope of the appeal waiver. Second, based on M cBride’s statements under oath at the plea hearing, we are satisfied th at he entered into both the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily. SeeNguyen v. United States , 114 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 1997) (defendant’s statements made during plea hearing carry strong presumption of verity). Thir d, we conclude that no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See Andis , 333 F.3d at 891-92 (miscarriage-of-justice exception is narrow and generally applie s only to claims of illegal sentences, sentences based on constitutionally impermissi ble factors, and ineffective assistance of counsel). Finally, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw, subject to counsel informing appellant about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Beth Phillips, United Stat es District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 741 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 741

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 29, 2023.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5525) making continuing appropriations for 
fiscal year 2024, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. The amendments printed in the report of 
the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations or their respective designees; and (2) 
one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  Upon passage of H.R. 5525 the title of such bill is amended to read 
as follows: ``Reducing spending, securing the border, and for other purposes.''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 7/21/14

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 5, EPA

SUBJECT: 7/21/14, Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants 

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on July 21, 2014 

to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. Minnesota submitted 

questions that were addressed by OAP and OAQPS during the call. The Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Kristen Bremer

David Solomon

Debra Dalcher

Elineth Torres

Nathan Topham

Office of Atmospheric Programs

David Risley

Brian Fisher

Beth Conlin

Nikolaas Dietsch

Joe Bryson

Christopher Sherry

Matt Clouse

Ryan Sims

Jim Ketcham-Colwill

MN Department of Commerce

Bill Grant

MN Public Utilities Commission

Nancy Lange

Sean Stalpes

Hwikwon Ham
2

Beverly Jones Heydinger

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

David Thorton

Anne Jackson

Frank Kohlasch

Katherine/Kate Nessler 

Peter Ciborowski

R5

George Czerniak

Eileen Furey

Alexis Cain

Melissa Hulting 

Megan Gavin

Erin Newman
Jesse Cleveland HARRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3071

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 7, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 APRIL 28, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13876

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00058-CR-CDL-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MASTER MICHAEL RAMSEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________

(April 28, 2010)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Master Michael Ramsey appeals his convictions for felony murder, 18
U.S.C. § 1111, kidnapping, id. § 1201, murder with a firearm during a crime of

violence, id. §§ 924(c)(1), (j), robbery, id. § 2111, theft of a motor vehicle, id.

§ 2119, and conspiracy to commit robbery, id. §§ 2111, 371. Ramsey argues that

the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his

vehicle. We affirm.

Ramsey argues that the search of his vehicle was invalid under state law and

rendered the search unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, but this argument

fails. The failure of law enforcement officers to comply with the demands of state

law regarding the search and seizure of property does not affect the admissibility of

evidence in federal court. United States v. Gilbert, 942 F.2d 1537, 1541 (11th Cir.

1991). Evidence is admissible so long as it was not “obtained by state officers

during a search which, if conducted by federal officers, would have violated the

defendant’s immunity from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth

Amendment,” Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 223–24, 80 S. Ct. 1437, 1447

(1960), and Ramsey does not argue that the search or seizure otherwise violated the

Fourth Amendment. The district court did not err by admitting at trial the evidence

seized from Ramsey’s vehicle.

Ramsey’s convictions are AFFIRMED.

2
|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      January 11, 2011 | /s/ George Dory                                                                                                                                            |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | George      Dory, Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer,      principal financial officer and principal accounting    officer |

----
```

[Federal Register: July 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 142)]
[Notices]               
[Page 43518]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26jy10-47]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Saturday, August 21, 2010, 8 a.m.-4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Dancing Bear Lodge, 144 Apple Valley Way, Townsend, 
Tennessee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia J. Halsey, Federal 
Coordinator, Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 
2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-
2347 or e-mail: halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The board will review their Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 
work plans and develop work plans for FY 2011.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Patricia J. Halsey at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Patricia J. Halsey at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests must be received five days 
prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include 
the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer 
is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Patricia 
J. Halsey at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will 
also be available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC on July 19, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-18129 Filed 7-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-41175

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENNY BOBBITT, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:96-CR-31-2

 

June 26, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenny Bobbitt appeals his conviction for aiding and abetting

in removing a vehicle identification number in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 2 & 511. He argues that the evidence was insufficient

to support his conviction.

Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities

convinces us that no reversible error was committed. Because 
2

Bobbitt failed to move for a judgment of acquittal at any point

in the proceedings, this court’s review is limited to determining

whether there was any manifest miscarriage of justice. See U.S.

v. Johnson, 87 F.3d 133, 136 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117

S.Ct. 1482 (1997). “A manifest miscarriage of justice is present

if the record is devoid of evidence pointing to guilt.” Id.

(citations omitted). As with any jury verdict, this court

reviews the evidence and all reasonable inferences that may be

drawn from that evidence in the light most favorable to the

government. Id.

Here, Bobbitt admitted dismantling a stolen 1993 Peterbilt

truck traced to the property of Bobbitt’s co-defendant, Charles

Craven, over the course of two days. Regardless of whether he

actually removed the vehicle identification numbers himself, he

actively participated with Craven in dismantling and stripping

the stolen vehicle so that parts could be reused without

detection. “This court must affirm a conviction for aiding and

abetting when sufficient evidence is tendered that the defendant

affirmatively acted with the intent to make the transaction

succeed.” U.S. v. Jaramillo, 42 F.3d 920, 924 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 514 U.S. 1134 (1995). We find that the evidence on

record pointing to guilt is not so deficient as to constitute a

manifest miscarriage of justice. See Johnson, 87 F.3d at 136.

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE Jason L. FROST

CR-16-0026

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 13, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 14, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 14, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0217. DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN OF GEORGIA, LLC et al. v. WHITNEY 

FOSTER et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2018CV00344
October 14, 2013

Docket FAA-2013-0655 Docket Management Facility US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590

RE: Part 117 – Early Implementation/Transition Exemption Petition

Dear Sir or Madam:

On September 26, 2013, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) re quested certificate holders seeking to implement Part 117 before its effective date to submit individual petitions to
the above-referenced docket number. Per the F AA’s request, GoJet Airlines (G7) submits this exemption petition for both early implementation and transition of Part 117 to begin between December 29, 2013 and January 04, 2014.

.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.

Regards

,

Capt. Steven A. Briner Director of Flight Operations 11495 Navaid Road, Suite 340 Bridgeton, Miss ouri 63044 (314)222-4390 sbriner@gojetairlines.com
Tony Lavaughn PEPPERS v. STATE

CR-15-0565

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 6 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 6

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 9, 2023.
    Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of daily meeting of the 
House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative 
business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 
Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```