alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SealyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 25,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), David J. McIlquham, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,and Jeffrey C. Ackerman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof the Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Corporation.

April 4,2007

|        |   | /s/    DAVID J.  MCILQUHAM                                                                  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | **David  J. McIlquham  Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)**                   |
|   |   | /s/    JEFFREY C. ACKERMAN                                                                  |
|   |   | **Jeffrey  C. Ackerman  Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Accounting Officer)** |

 

----
exv10w15



 





			
	
	 	Exhibit 10.15






November 17, 2006




Bill Wilson

3143 Holyrood Drive

Oakland, CA 94611




Dear Mr. Wilson:




     Activant Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Activant”), is pleased to inform you that
you are eligible to receive a retention bonus of $131,250.00 (the “Bonus”), payable in five
equal annual installments, as provided below, as a reward for your continued employment with
Activant or one of its subsidiaries:



	 	 	 
	Date of Bonus Payment	 	Amount of Bonus
	September 30, 2007
	 	20%
	September 30, 2008
	 	20%
	September 30, 2009
	 	20%
	September 30, 2010
	 	20%
	September 30, 2011
	 	20%





Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of the consummation of a Change in Control (as
defined in the Amended and Restated Activant Group Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan) of
Activant, all annual installments set forth above not previously paid shall become
immediately due and payable upon such consummation, subject to the following paragraph of
this letter.




     You must be employed by Activant or one of its subsidiaries, whether as an employee,
consultant or advisor, at the time each installment is payable in order to earn and receive
such installment, but there are no other conditions to the Bonus. In the event that your
service relationship with Activant or one of its subsidiaries terminates prior to the time
any annual installment is payable, you will forfeit that and all subsequent installments.
Activant may withhold from the Bonus any such Federal, state, local or other taxes, including
applicable taxes of any jurisdiction outside the United States, as shall be required to be
withheld pursuant to any applicable law or regulation.



     You understand that the Bonus made available to you hereunder does not constitute a
guarantee of continued employment with Activant or one of its subsidiaries, and that your
service relationship with Activant or its subsidiaries is at will. As such, you or Activant or
its subsidiaries may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason or no reason,
either with or without cause or advance notice. In addition, Activant and its subsidiaries
retain the right to modify your compensation and benefits, other than this Bonus, within their
sole discretion, upon notice to you, to the fullest extent allowed by law.



 









 





     Unless otherwise determined by Activant’s Board of Directors, any payments made hereunder
will not be taken into account in computing your salary or compensation for the purposes of
determining any benefits or compensation under (i) any retirement, life insurance or other benefit
plan of Activant or (ii) any agreement between Activant and you.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Greg Petersen
 	 
	 	Greg Petersen, 	 
	 	Executive Vice President
H. Res. 70 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 30, 2023. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Issa, Mr. Buck, 

Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. Biggs, Mr. 

McClintock, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Massie, Mr. Roy, Mr. Bishop 

of North Carolina, Mrs. Spartz, Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Bentz, 

Mr. Cline, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Nehls, 

Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Kiley, Ms. Hageman, Mr. Moran, 

Ms. Lee of Florida, Mr. Hunt, Mr. Fry. 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY: Mr. 

Jordan, Mr. Turner, Mr. Gosar, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Grothman, 

Mr. Palmer, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 

Biggs, Ms. Mace, Mr. LaTurner, Mr. Fallon, Mr. Donalds, 

Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Perry, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Burchett, Mrs. 
2 

•HRES 70 EH 

Greene of Georgia, Mrs. McClain, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Fry, 

Mrs. Luna, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Langworthy, Mr. Burlison. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

        JOINT CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
           FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(B)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protocall Technologies Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Mark
Benedikt, Chief Executive Officer, and Donald J. Hoffmann, Vice President,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 15, 2005


/s/      Mark Benedikt
-----------------------------------------------
Mark Benedikt
Chief Executive Officer


/s/      Donald J. Hoffmann
-----------------------------------------------
Donald J. Hoffmann
Vice President, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
Janeane R. CORRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106441

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: December 26, 2018

FOR APPELLANTS: Edwards S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENTS: Shaun J. Mackelprang, Joshua Hawley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*402***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

Janeane Correll appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of her Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief. Correll claims that the motion court clearly erred because her conviction of the felony of stealing and sentence of six years' imprisonment were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in *State v. Bazell* , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo.banc 2016). We affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

All rules references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2017).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60947 Summary Calendar

TYREE W. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

No. 3:05-CV-00241-WHB-AGN

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tyree W. Brown appeals the decision of the District Court granting summary judgment on his claims and dismissing them with prejudice. Brown has filed numerous claims stemming from the death of his brother twenty-five years ago, alleging on various theories that he or other family members were exposed to chemicals produced by Dow. The present claim before us asserts that the plaintiff was exposed to the chemical pentachlorophenol by Dow Chemical andNo. 05-40696 -2- suffers cancer and post-traumatic stress syndrome as a result. Brown’s claims are based on the same facts as a 2001 lawsuit involving the same parties which was dismissed on the grounds that Brown had not offered evidence attributing his injuries to Dow Chemical. The District Court properly held that the present lawsuit is foreclosed by the doctrine of res judicata. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States , 365 F.3d 385, 395-96 (5th Cir. 2004). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC PENSION INVESTORS '84 SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          37,860
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  206,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,193
<PP&E>                                       4,005,882
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,859,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,090,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,767
<BONDS>                                      1,354,190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,586,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,090,406
<SALES>                                        439,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               558,557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                299,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            299,390
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   299,390
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.85


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
DAUGHERTY RESOURCES, INC.                                            EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(United States Dollars)
Unaudited

The table below presents information necessary for the computation of earnings
or loss per share of common stock, on both a primary and fully diluted basis,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998. The computations below reflect the 1 for 5
Reverse Stock Split effective June 30, 1999.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              For the nine months
                                               Ended September 30,                 For the Years Ended December 31,
                                               -------------------                 --------------------------------

                                              2001             2000             2000              1999              1998
                                              ----             ----             ----              ----              ----

<S>                                        <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>
Net income (loss) applicable to share
of Common Stock and Common
Stock Equivalents                          $    53,258      $   135,761      $    48,639      $(7,220,920)      $(1,568,348)


Average number of shares of
Common Stock Outstanding                     3,742,724        2,695,723        2,957,366        2,261,754         2,035,188


Common Stock equivalents*                    6,015,650        5,978,492        6,016,729        5,933,586         1,725,960
                                           -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------       -----------


Total shares of Common Stock and
Common Stock equivalents                     9,758,374        8,674,215        8,974,095        8,195,340         3,761,148
                                           ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========       ===========

Primary income (loss) per share of
Common Stock                               $      0.01      $      0.05      $      0.02      $     (3.19)      $     (0.77)
                                           ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========       ===========


Fully diluted income (loss) per share
of Common Stock*                           $      0.01      $      0.02      $      0.01      $     (3.19)      $     (0.77)
                                           ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========       ===========
</TABLE>



*Common Stock equivalents are considered anti-dilutive in loss years.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 





Exhibit 10.3


DESCRIPTION OF THE MATERIAL TERMS OF

THE MIVA 2008 BONUS PROGRAM


The MIVA 2008 Bonus
Program (the “Bonus Program”) provides for the payment of cash
bonuses to employees of MIVA, Inc. (the “Company”) and its
subsidiaries, including the Company’s currently employed named executive
officers (the “NEOs,” as named in the Company’s 2007 proxy
statement). Bonus payouts to the NEOs under the Bonus Program are based on
achievement of adjusted EBITDA objectives for the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (earnings
before interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization) plus
non-cash compensation expense plus or minus certain identified revenues or
expenses that are not expected to recur or be representative of future ongoing
operation of the business.


The following table
sets forth the target bonus amounts for which an NEO is eligible under the Bonus Program:



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Target Bonus
	Executive Officer	 	Position	 	(as a % of 2008 base salary)
	Peter Corrao
	 	Chief Executive Officer	 	80%
	Sebastian Bishop
	 	President and Chief Marketing Officer	 	55%*	
	Lowell W. Robinson
	 	Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer	 	60%
	John Pisaris
	 	General Counsel
	 	50%





* If exchange rates vary to
the extent that the U.S. dollar strengthens significantly against Sterling,
then this percentage may vary and for this individual only.


Any bonus payouts to
NEOs will be made on an annual basis. Participants in the Bonus Program,
including the NEOs, are eligible to over-achieve their target bonus based on
over-achievement of adjusted EBITDA to a maximum total payout per participant
of 200% of such participant’s target bonus. In the event of a change of
control, the adjusted EBITDA objectives will be deemed to be met for the NEOs,
and each NEO’s target bonus for the full year will be paid upon
consummation of the change of control, and in any event, no later than
March 15, 2009.


Except for certain
executives, or as provided in a contract to the contrary, a participant’s
right to any bonus under the Bonus Program will cease upon termination of
employment for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary. For NEOs with
employment contracts containing provisions for termination for “good
reason” or termination by the Company “without cause,” upon
separation of employment for either of those reasons, the executive will
receive an amount equal to their target bonus, pro-rated for the amount of time
employed by the Company in fiscal 2008, increased or decreased pursuant to
actual performance versus targeted performance in the Bonus Program measured as
of the end of the calendar month preceding the termination date. Any such
pro-rata bonus will be paid as soon as administratively possible following
termination, and in any event, no later than March 15, 2009.


The Company reserves
the right to amend or cancel the Bonus Program for any reason in its sole
discretion.





8
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8568

QUINTON LEE COOK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BROWN CREEK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; OFFICER

BYRD; OFFICER ROBERTS; OFFICER DOSS; OFFICER

WHITE; JEFFREY BINNS, Sergeant; SERGEANT

GADDY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-95-464-3-MU)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quinton Lee Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Cook v. Brown Creek Correctional Inst., No. CA-95-464-3-MU

(W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
March 8, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KRISTIN MCKAMEY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00321

- CV V.

ANTHONY D. HICKS , Appellee

____________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on March 9, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by rea son of this appeal be paid by
KRISTIN MCKAMEY

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 7, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00166

- CR

Richard DEBENEDETTO

, Appellant

v.

The State of

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A1482

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State ’s Motion for Extension of Time to Fi le the Brief has been GRANTED. Time is

extended to November 13, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Steven A. Wadsworth

Assistant District Attorney

- 216th Judicial District

200 Earl Garrett St., Suite 202

Kerrville, TX 78028 Patrick Edwin O'Fiel

The Law Office of Patrick O'Fiel, P.C.

The Schreiner Building

200 Earl Ga rrett, Suite 206

Kerrville, TX 78028
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Classic Rules Judo Championship, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)   The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 4, 2017





/s/ Lorenzo DeLucaLorenzo DeLucaChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**E** **XHIBIT** **32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of TXP Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Bruce, Chief
      Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TXP Corporation and will be retained by TXP Corporation and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





February
      8,
      2007


/s/ *Robert
                  Bruce**Robert Bruce*
                  *Chief
                            Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial
                            Officer)*
S.K., Father of A. K., a Minor Child, Appellant, v. Mark R. MILLER, Intermediary, on Behalf of Prospective Adoptive Parents, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2749

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Osario Shamel-Dudley RYAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 16, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|  Name of Subsidiary  |   | Jurisdiction inWhichIncorporated |   | % of VotingSecurities Owned |
|--------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| US Natural Gas Corp KY         |   |                             | FL     |                        |   | 100% |
| US Natural Gas Corp WV         |   |                             | FL     |                        |   | 100% |
| E 3 Petroleum Corp             |   |                             | FL     |                        |   | 100% |
| E 2 Investments, LLC           |   |                             | FL     |                        |   | 100% |
| B.T.U. Pipeline, Inc. (1)      |   |                             | TN     |                        |   | 100% |
| SLMI Options, LLC              |   |                             | NV     |                        |   | 100% |