alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 19, 2011

d1012 

# Order

October 19, 2011

142519(79)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142519 COA: 283056 Wayne CC: 07-013349-FC NATHAN EMMANUEL JACOBS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 22, 2011 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated June 22, 2011. On reconsideration, the application for leav e to appeal the Decembe r 7, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pu rsuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in light of the parties’ stipulation that the defendant is entitled to a new trial, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMA ND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for
a new trial.
JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General 

oooatmdwwsulmnz 

Lubmdl.lx.7mol 

oow4?-oza 

The Attorney Geqeral of Texas 

September 5, 1978 

Honorable George N. Rodriguez, Jr. 

County Attorney 

Rl Paso County 

Room 201 City-County Building 

Rl Paso, Texas 79901 

Opinion No. H- 12 37 

Re: Whether a county may pay 

claims for supplies and services 

rendered to the-Sheriff’s Department without a purchase order 

when the commissioners court 

has issued e written order that 

.‘theclaimbepaid. 

Dear Mr. Rodriguez: 

You have requested our opinion on a question involving payment of a 

claim for supplies and services rendered to the county. 

You state that a number of vendors provided supplies and services to 

the sheriff’s department, but failed to comply with article 1580, Y.T.C.S., as 

amended, Acts l975,64th Deg., ch. 294, S 1, et 748, applicable to all counties 

with a population in excess of 74,000. Article 1580 establishes the county 

purt?hasing agent, an officer not under the supervision of the commissioners 

court, as the proper party to contract for all county supplies and services 

except those required to be let on competitive bid. The statute prohibits any 

other perkon from entering into such contracts and directs the county auditor 

not to drew warrants “for any purchases except by such agent and those made 

by competitive bid.” In the situation you pose, the commissioners court has 

by written order directed payment of the claims, but the auditor has refused 

to comply. 

We considered an almost identical question in Attorney General Opinion 

I-I-482 (19741, and concluded that, where a contract fails to comply with 

article 1580 because the county purchasing agent is not a party thereto, the 

county auditor is prohibited from drawing a warrant for the contract. The 

authority of the commissioners court to regulate county fiscal matters has 

been circumscribed by article 1580, and since the court was powerless to 

make the contract initially, it was equally powerless to ratify it. 

In our opinion, the same result is applicable here. The commissioners 

court is not authorized to order payment of a claim under a contract made in 

P. 4934 
Honorable George N. Rodriguez, Jr. - Page 2 (H-1237) 

violation of article 1580, and the auditor is prohibited from paying such a claim. 

But see Wyatt Metal & Boiler Works v. Pennin Count& 111 S.W.2d 787, 790 (Tex. 

Civ. App. - Texarkana 1937, writ dism’d); Attorney General Opinion H-482 (1974). 

SUMMARY 

The commissioners court is not authorized to direct payment 

of e claim under a contract which contravenes article 1580, 

and the county auditor is prohibited from paying such a 

claim. 

APPROVED: 

Attorney General of Texas 

Gpiion Committee 

m 

p. 4935
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice
136321 & (82)(85)(86) Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Justices Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 136321 COA: 269999 Wayne CC: 05-003753 ANTHONY LEE BAISDEN, Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for bond pending appeal is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant remain pending.

p0729 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 1, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gaylord
M. Karren, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company. 
 DATE: May
16, 2005
 
 
 /s/
Gaylord M. Karren
 Gaylord
M. Karren
 Chief
Executive Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer
 Electric
Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc.
June 25, 2015

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0111

Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mailcode: 2822T

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

To the members of the EPA working on the Renewable Fuels Standard, thank you for your time. 

My name is Kim Bertz, and I live in rural Lafayette County, Missouri. I am a farm-wife, a mother 

of 3 daughters dedicated to the agricultural industry, and I have worked for Novozymes for the 

past 8 years. I appreciate the work you do -- a responsibility for research, analysis, foresight to 

do what is right for our nation and its future generations.

A healthy America is strong, sustainable, and independently able to nurture and defend 

itself. America, and the EPA, has the opportunity to create even greater strength – for its 

people, its purpose, its pride and generations to come. That opportunity is the RFS.

Fuel is the lifeblood of this widespread, resource-rich nation, enabling development and 

production of goods, services, people and industry to move throughout and across its borders.

However, as America grows we need to increase our own inner strength and sustainability, 

becoming less dependent on foreign countries. I fully support a strong federal RFS because 

increasing domestic renewable fuel leads to greater national security, more American 

jobs, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and lower gas prices. The RFS is that strong 

foundation, our inner strength, enabling home-grown sustainable fuels that gives our nation the 

ability to thrive.

Living on a Western Missouri production agriculture corn and soybean farm, I see and feel the 

widespread benefits of the RFS ... not only do our crops produce American fuel, and livestock 

to feed American families, but I personally work in the BioEnergy sector. I see and feel every 

day the incredible impact that the RFS has from city to farm, national, state and rural community 

development. I don’t know of any program or idea put into place that has a greater opportunity 

to affect more Americans and strengthen our country than the RFS. 
The developers of the RFS were brilliant. The EPA, however, has submitted a proposal that 

would severely weaken America, and directly contradicts the EPA’s other efforts - such as 

reducing greenhouse gas emissions. That proposal could increase greenhouse gas emissions 

equal to putting 2.1 million more cars back on the road. Renewable biofuels are the cleanest 

and most sustainable liquid fuel in the world and is the last industry you should ever pull 

back from. In the final rule, the EPA should require obligated party compliance with the laws by 

blending increasing volumes of renewable fuels. Please -- support American jobs, a cleaner 

environment and greater national security. Please support a stable RFS. The RFS works

for America.

Sincerely,

 Kim M. Bertz

Kim M. Bertz

12113 Prairie Valley Road

Mayview, MO 64071
Joseph L. STRICKLAND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 08, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHARLES H. WILLIAMS, II,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3786

[May 2, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 08-002929-CF-10A.

Charles H. Williams, II, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, David M. Lobach, Jr., certify that:





1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Embassy Bancorp, Inc.;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of  the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal  control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c)  I evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:





(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







By:
/s/ David M. Lobach, Jr.DAVID M. LOBACH, JR.Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDATED:  March 31, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

/s/ A. Leon Blaser

A. Leon Blaser, Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 13, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Gold Standard Mining Corp, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



(i)

The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  July13, 2011 | By:        /s/ Pantelis Zachos
Name:        Pantelis Zachos
Title:           Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Donald M. MONTANEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 23.1
   Ronald R. Chadwick, P.C.
 Certified Public Accountant
 2851 South Parker Road
 Suite 720
 Aurora, Colorado  80014
 Phone (303)306-1967
 Fax (303)306-1944
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    The undersigned, Ronald R. Chadwick, P.C., hereby consents to the use of our name and the use of our opinion dated April 29, 2010 on the financial statements of Equinox International, Inc. (the “Company”) included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K being filed by the Company, for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010.
  /s/ Ronald R. Chadwick, P.C.Ronald r. Chadwick, P.C.Aurora, ColoradoMay 10, 2010
Jorge A. GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2921

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,436]


Continental Automotive Systems U.S., Inc.; Elkhart, IN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 2, 2009, in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at 
Continental Automotive Systems U.S., Inc., Elkhart, Indiana.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7112 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Bruce
Goldstein, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2009, of SeaOspa Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)          Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)          Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)          Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)          All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)          Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Dated:  April
9, 2010




/s/ Bruce GoldsteinBruce
      GoldsteinPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 637 

Commending the Southeastern Wildlife Exposition for its 40 years of 

celebrating the great outdoors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2023 

Ms. MACE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Southeastern Wildlife Exposition for its 

40 years of celebrating the great outdoors. 

Whereas the Southeastern Wildlife Exposition (SEWE) held 

its first festival in Charleston, South Carolina, in February 1983, hosting 100 artists and exhibitors and 5,000 

attendees; 

Whereas SEWE has now grown to become an important and 

highly anticipated annual event in Charleston during 

Presidents Day weekend, welcoming approximately 500 

artists, exhibitors, and wildlife experts, and 40,000 

attendees each year; 

Whereas SEWE generates an estimated $50,000,000 in economic impact for Charleston every year and has become 

synonymous with the kickoff of the city’s tourism season; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 637 IH 

Whereas, over the past 40 years, SEWE has established itself 

as the Nation’s premier celebration of wildlife art and the 

great outdoors; 

Whereas SEWE remains committed to making positive contributions to wildlife art, conservation, education, and 

local and regional economies through entertainment; and 

Whereas the legacy built by SEWE over the past four decades has impacted both the Charleston community and 

the conservation world: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the Southeastern Wildlife Ex3 position (SEWE) on the occasion of its 40th anni4 versary for its successful festivals promoting wildlife 

5 conservation, education, and the arts; and 

6 (2) commends SEWE for enriching the Charles7 ton community and our Nation with its annual cele8 bration of natural wonders, and we encourage it to 

9 continue bringing Charleston’s culture to the world 

10 for another 40 years. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Magaly Santos MARRERO, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and S.W. Fla. Enterprises Inc., Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D17-1150

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1

SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs
PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS
--------------------------------
www.sealebeers.com

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
           --------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Nevada Processing
Solutions, of our report dated November 6, 2009 on our audit of the financial
statements of Nevada Processing Solutions as of September 30, 2009 and 2008,
and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows
for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and since inception on
May 30, 2009 through September 30, 2009, and the reference to us under the
caption "Experts."

/s/ Seale and Beers, CPAs
-------------------------
    Seale and Beers, CPAs
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    November 12, 2009

               50 South Jones Blvd., Suite 202 Las Vegas, NV 89107
                        888-727-8251 Fax: 888-782-2351


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sealy Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ending August 29, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lawrence J. Rogers, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, and Jeffrey C. Ackerman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



September 30, 2010/s/ LAWRENCE J. ROGERS Lawrence J. Rogers President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ JEFFREY C. ACKERMAN Jeffrey C. Ackerman Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks