alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.17.4


 


Additional Agreement No. 1


 


To Agency Agreement between OAO
Rostelecom and OJSC Dalsvyaz


No. 33-06-23 dated June 09,
2006


 


	
  Moscow

  	
   

  	
  Dated
  June 9, 2007

  



 


Rostelecom, Open Joint-Stock Company for Long-Distance and
International Telecommunications,
hereinafter, “Rostelecom”, represented by OAO Rostelecom General Director Dmitry Yevgenievich Yerokhin, authorized to act by the
Charter, on the one part, and “Far East Telecommunications Company”, Open
Joint-Stock Company, hereinafter referred to as the “Operator”, represented by
General Director Anton Alekseyevich Alekseyev,
authorized to act by the Charter, on the other part hereinafter collectively
referred to as the “Parties”, and severally, as “Party”, have entered into this
Additional Agreement (hereinafter, “the Additional Agreement”) on the
incorporation of the below-listed amendments in the Agency Agreement
(hereinafter, “the Agreement”), as follows:


 


1.               To add to the Agreement clause 12.4 that
states:


 


The Parties hereby establish that terms and conditions
of the Agreement entered into thereby shall apply to their relations arisen
since January 01, 2006.


 


2.               All terms used in this Additional Agreement have a meaning, fixed for
them in the Agreement.


 


3.               All the rest, not indicated in this Additional Agreement, is subject to
the provisions of the Agreement.


 


4.               The Additional Agreement is issued in the Russian language in two
original counterparts, one for  each
Party.


 


5.               The Additional Agreement shall enter into legal force on the Agreement
Date and expire with the expiry of Agency Agreement No. 33-06-23
on June 09, 2006.


 


6.               Details and Signatures of the Parties


 


	
  For OAO Rostelecom:

  

  Legal address:

  15, Dostoyevsky  st.,

  191002 Saint Petersburg

  

  General Director

  

  

                              
  D.Ye. Yerokhin

                                    
  2007

  Seal here

  	
   

  	
  For OJSC  Dalsvyaz

  

  Legal  address:

  57, Svetlanskaya st.,

  690950, Vladivostok

  

  General Director

  

  

                                  
  A.A. Alekseyev

                                    
  2007

  Seal here

  



 


1
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com>

Date: 7/20/2010 3:26 PM

Subject: Re: RRI Energy Niles Power Plant Request

Attachments: pic32488.gif; US EPA Niles Request.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the RRI Energy's Niles facility. The

deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed

questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic32488.gif)

 

 From: "Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Whelan, Kerry M." 

<KWhelan@rrienergy.com>, "Frank,

 Stephen" <SFrank@rrienergy.com>, <DIANE.R.MARTINI@Sargentlundy.com>, "Macey, Francis 

E"

 <fmacey@rrienergy.com>, "Cunningham, Allison" <ACunningham@rrienergy.com>, "Greek, 

Matt E."

 <MGreek@rrienergy.com>, "Brown, Steven W." <SwBrown@rrienergy.com>, "Senedak, 

Thomas C."

 <TCSenedak@rrienergy.com> 

 

 Date: 06/30/2010 08:41 AM 

 Subject: RRI Energy Niles Power Plant Request 

Dear Ms. Alicea,

Please see the attached request for a due date extension on the Steam

Electric Questionnaire from the RRI Energy Niles power station. If you

have any questions please feel free to contact me.
Thank you,

Rocky Tondo

RRI Energy

General Manager

Niles Power Plant

1047 Belmont Ave

Niles, OH 44446

Office 330-505-4327

Cell 330-301-2788

 (See attached file: US EPA Niles Request.pdf)
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended Dec. 31, 2009 of PB Properties & Investments, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Carlos EspinosaCarlos EspinosaChief Executive Officer/s/ Carlos EspinosaCarlos EspinosaChief Financial OfficerDated: April 5, 2010   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to PB Properties & Investments, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Beta Music Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date:  April 5, 2013By:/s/Edwin MendlingerEdwin MendlingerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2011 of Numbeer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Michael Allan English, President, Secretary/ Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  September 14, 2011/s/ Michael Allan EnglishName:  Michael Allan EnglishTitle: President, Secretary/ Treasurer, Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
AFS

- 13

- 510

- E October 21, 2013

Exemption No. 10876

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 0 744

Ms

. Lora Batson

Parent of Oliver Batson

55 Poplar Street, Apt. 3B

Brookly, NY 11201

Dear Ms. Batson :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

The Basis fo r Our Decision

By letter received September 5 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administrat ion

(FAA) on behalf of Oliver Batson for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14,

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. That exemp tion , if gr anted, would allow Oliver to

exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system (CAReS,

manufactured by AmSafe Corporation ) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard

a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has deter mined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exem ption would not set a precedent and any

delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to Oliver

.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that numerous p eople with physical challenges had previously completed flights using

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition , if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the

situation you present ; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I hereby grant O liver Batson an exemption from § 121.311(b). In

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Oliver is

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary

to allow him to use an F AA

- approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft

.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted w ith at least one of Oliver ’s parents or a caregiver accompanying h im

. Oliver Batson may only occupy a passenger seat with no

passenger se ated behind h im

. In a ddition, Oliver ’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on October 31 , 201 8 , unless sooner superse ded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
1/2 

## EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

AD No.: 2007 – 0136

Date: 14 May 2007

No person may operate an aircraft to which an Airworthine ss Directive applies, except in accordance with the requirements of that Airworthiness Dir ective unless otherwise agreed with the Authority of the St ate of Registry. 

### Type Approval Holder’s Name: ROLLS-ROYCE PLC Type/Model designation(s): RB211 Trent 700 series engines

TCDS Number: EASA:- E042

Foreign AD: Not applicable.

Supersedure: None.



### ATA 72 Engine – IP Compressor Shaft - Inspection

Manufacturer: Rolls-Royce PLC
Applicability: Models RB211 Trent 768- 60, 772-60, 772B-60 and 772C-60 engines. These engines are known to be insta lled on, but not limited to, Airbus A330 series aeroplanes.
Reason: This Airworthiness Directive requi res inspections for cracks in the stage 2- 3 interstage spacer of the IP Compressor Rotor during shop visit.
This action is necessary following the discovery of IP Compressor Rotor stage 2-3 interstage spacer cracking on an in-service Trent 700 engine. Stress analysis of the damaged rotor has shown a possible threat to the rotor integrity, the cracking t herefore presents a potential unsafe condition. The cause of the cracki ng is currently under investigation.
Effective Date: 29 May 2007
Compliance: 1) Inspection- In-shop
Inspect the IP compressor drum stage 2-3 interstage spacer for cracking at every shop visit as follows:
a) If the IP Compressor rotor is not removed from the IP Compressor Casing, inspect the IP compressor drum stage 2-3 interstage spacer by borescope in accordance with Rolls-Royce RB211 Propulsion System Alert Non Modification Service Bulletin RB211-72-AE753 revision 1 (or later approved issue) section 3 Accomplishment Instructions (paragraphs F and G are applicable2/2 in revision 1).
b) If the IP Compressor rotor is removed from the IP Compressor Casing inspect the IP compressor drum stage 2-3 interstage spacer by Eddy Current Inspec tion in accordance with RollsRoyce RB211 Propulsion System Alert Non Modification Service Bulletin RB211-72-AF197 initial issue (or later approved issue) section 3 Accomplishment Instructions.
IP Compressor drums on which cracki ng is identified by the above means must be rejected from service.
Ref. Publications: Rolls-Royce RB211 Propulsi on System Alert Non Modification Service Bulletin RB211-72-AF197 initial issue and Alert Non Modification Service Bulletin RB211-72-AE753 revision 1.
Remarks: 1. If requested and appropriately substantiated the responsible EASA manager for the related product has t he authority to accept Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) for this AD.
2. This AD was published as PAD 07-059 on 16 April 2007 for consultation until 10 May 2007. No comments were received during this period.
3. Enquiries regarding this Airworthiness Directive should be referred to Mr. M. Capaccio, Airworthiness Dire ctive Focal Point - Certification Directorate, EASA. E-mail: ADs@easa.europa.eu
4. For any questions concerning the te chnical content of the requirements in this AD, please contact Rolls-Royce plc. PO Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom. Phone: +44 (0) 1332 242424, Fax: +44 (0) 1332 249936.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 27, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 27, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0088. CITY OF ATLANTA v. TOLL SOUTHEAST LP COMPANY, INC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2020CV343208
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6344]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Meeting Schedule for 2010

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
CommitteeAct (Pub. L. No. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules Of 
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) will meet on the 
following dates in Room 7C13 of the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) Building (441 G Street, NW.,) unless otherwise noted:

--Wednesday and Thursday, February 24 and 25, 2010.
--Wednesday and Thursday, April 28 and 29, 2010.
--Wednesday and Thursday, June 23 and 24, 2010.
--Wednesday and Thursday, August 25 and 26, 2010.
--Wednesday and Thursday, October 27 and 28, 2010.
--Thursday and Friday, December 16 and 17, 2010.

    The purposes of the meetings are to discuss issues related to:

--FASAB's conceptual framework,
--Stewardship Reporting,
--Social Insurance,
--Natural Resources,
--Deferred Maintenance/Asset Impairment,
--Technical Agenda, and
--Any other topics as needed.

    A more detailed agenda can be obtained from the FASAB Web site 
(www.fasab.gov) one week prior to each meeting.
    Any interested person may attend the meetings as an observer. Board 
discussion and reviews are open to the public. GAO Building security 
requires advance notice of your attendance. Please notify FASAB of your 
planned attendance by calling 202-512-7350 at least one day prior to 
the respective meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, 
441 G St., NW., Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 
512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law No. 92-
463.

    Dated: March 18, 2009.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-6344 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
The H onorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for th e 1 Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3555

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Donald E. Wiggins, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 7, 1998 Filed: May 12, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In1993 , Donald E. Wiggins was sentenced to 48 months’ imprisonment an d three years’ supervi sed release after he pleaded guilty to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). After Wiggins violated several conditions of his supervise d release, the district court revoked it and sentenced him to 12 months’ and one day 1-2-

imprisonment

and 24 months’ supervised release. Wiggins appeals, arguing that hi s revocation sentence was imposed in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. That argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. St. John , 92 F.3d 761,765-67 (8th Cir. 1996) (holding application of 1994 statute expressly providing for supervised release following revocation of supervised release that was imposed prior to 1994 did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause; prior to new law, this circuit interpreted law to allow imposition of both impr isonment and supervised release upon revocation, and thus “m aximum period of time that a defendant & s freedom can be restrained . .
. under the new law is either the same as, or possibly less than, under the prior law”). The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
173-201A-410 << 173-201A-420 >> 173-201A-430

(1) The criteria established in WAC 173-201A-200 through 173-201A-260 and 173- 201A-600 through 173-201A-612 may be modified for individual facilities, or stretches of waters, through the use of a variance. Variances may be approved by the department when: (a) The modification is consistent with t he requirements of federal law (currently 40 C.F.R. 131.10(g) and 131.10(h)); (b) The water body is a ssigned variances for specif ic criteria and all other applicable criteria must be met; and (c) Reasonable progress is being made toward meeting the original criteria. (2) The decision to approve a variance is subject to a public and intergovernmental involvement process. (3) The department may issu e a variance for up to five years, and may renew the variance after providing fo r another opportunityfor public and intergovernmental involvement and review. (4) Variances are not in ef fect until they have been inco rporated into this chapter and approved bythe USEPA.

[Statutory Authority: RCW 90.48.035 . WSR 11-09-090 (Order 10-10), § 173-201A-420, filed 4/20/11, effective 5/21/11. Statutory Authority: Chapters 90.48 and 90.54 RCW. WSR 03-14- 129 (Order 02-14), § 173-201A-420, filed 7/1/03, effective 8/1/03.] Agency filings affecting this section 

### WAC 173-201A-420

Variance. Page 1 of 1 WAC 17 3 -201 A -420: Variance.

8 /26 /201 5 http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WA C/default.aspx?cite=17 3 -201 A -420
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3803 — EADS/Nokia)

(2005/C 166/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.3803 — EADS/Nokia, to the following address:

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of eCrypt Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Brad Lever, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  July 13, 2010 /s/Brad Lever, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Inventions; Available 
for Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN) announces the availability of 
the inventions listed below, assigned to the United States Government, 
as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, for domestic and foreign 
licensing by the Department of the Navy.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed 
to Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 
Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 
47522-5001, Email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#44072c362d37302b342c21366a092b2a37213d042a25323d6a292d28"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="63200b110a10170c130b06114d2e0c0d10061a230d02151a4d0e0a0f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following patents are available for 
licensing: Patent No. 9,826,793 (Navy Case No. 101446): MASK COUPLING 
APPARATUS.

    Authority:  35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: December 21, 2017.
E.K. Baldini,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate 
General's Corps, U.S. Navy.
[FR Doc. 2017-28305 Filed 12-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>