alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Ernest Cheung, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Longbow Mining, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarter-
ly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  May 21, 2004


/s/ Ernest Cheung
-----------------------
Ernest Cheung,
Secretary/Treasurer and a
member of the Board of Directors
(who also performs the function of
principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02625**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 02625\02625_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02625\02625_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 02625\02625_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02625\02625_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02625\02625_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02625\02625_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02625\02625_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02625\Certification Statement Plant ID 02625.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 02625\Supporting Documentation\02625_Part A Attachment-Aerial view.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02625\Supporting Documentation\Part A Attachment-Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18
U.S.C. Section 1350)





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Radiant Logistics, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





DATE:
February 13, 2009





BY:
                /s/
      Bohn H. CrainChief Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Radiant Logistics, Inc and will be retained by Radiant Logistics,
Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
JEEA, LLC and Jacob Eyal, Appellants, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D17-287

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 14, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stock Market Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Smitten, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                                /s/ Richard Smitten
                                                ---------------------
                                                    Richard Smitten;
                                                    President and Principal Financial Officer

August 19, 2003
```
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:      November 3, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Juan J. RománJuan J. RománVice President of Finance
and
Chief Financial Officer  51
Glen S. EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106590

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: April 30, 2019 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 4, 2019 Application for Transfer Denied September 3, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Paul L. Schmitz, Uthoff, Graeber, Bobinette & Blanke, 906 Olive Street, Suite 300, St. Louis Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Julie E. Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

Glen Scott Evans ("Movant") appeals the motion court's denial of his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2015) amended motion for postconviction relief. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred by waiving claims not specifically raised in the amended motion and by denying the four claims properly raised in the amended motion, specifically: failure to prepare for testimony of a State's witness, Movant's ex-wife ("Nikki Evans"); failure to call Co-Defendant as a favorable witness; failure to prepare Movant for trial; and failure to object during cross-examination at trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.

We affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b)(2) (2018).
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James E. Hogue, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wiltex A, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport.
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in the quarterly report fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:
     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”), and
     c. Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
     a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.     By: /s/ JAMES E. HOGUE    James E. Hogue  Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)   Date: February 10, 2004
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Ehouse Global, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward J. Peplinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 12, 2013  By: /s/ Edward J. Peplinski Edward J. Peplinski Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2010of Alarming Devices, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.











Date: October 20, 2010











/s/ Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira


Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira


President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer and Director
Exhibit 3.3




ROSS MILLER

Secretary of State

204 North Carson Street, Suite 1

Carson City, Nevada 89701-4520

(775) 684 5708

Website: www.nvsos.gov





Certificate of Amendment(PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390)





USE BLACK INK ONLY - DO NOT HIGHLIGHT
ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY





Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation


For Nevada Profit Corporations


(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)





1. Name of corporation:


Sumotext Incorporated





2. The articles have been amended as follows: (provide article numbers, if available)


Article 1. Name of the corporation: Sebring Software, Inc.





3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise a least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation* have voted in favor of the amendment is:


69,376,450








4. Effective date of filing: (optional)
10/29/10(must not be later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)





5. Signature: (required)





X /s/ Leif Andersen





Signature of Officer





*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless to limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.





IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit with the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.


This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.


Nevada Secretary of State Amend Profit-AfterRevised: 3-6-09
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 2 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 2

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                          January 7 (legislative day, January 6), 2023.
    Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of the House of 
Representatives has assembled; that Kevin McCarthy, a Representative from the 
State of California, has been elected Speaker; and that Cheryl L. Johnson, a 
citizen of the State of Louisiana, has been elected Clerk of the House of 
Representatives of the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHAIRMAN/CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., a Florida
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
      Charles A. Fust, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
      knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Charles A. FustCharles
                A. FustChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 19,
                2007/s/
                Charles A. FustCharles
                A. FustChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                19, 2007







The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Form 10-QSB
      or
      as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating,
      acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
      within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
      906,
      has been provided to SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. and will be retained by
      SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Craig Pomranz, Respondent, v Joshua Tauber et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[720 NYS2d 39]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about December 14, 1999, which, in an action by a tenant against his landlords alleging fraud and seeking rescission of an agreement under which the tenant surrendered the subject apartment, restoration of the apartment to plaintiffs possession, compensatory damages, and treble damages and attorneys’ fees under New York State Rent and Eviction Regulations (9 NYCRR) § 2106.1 (d), denied the landlords’ motion to dismiss the complaint, and granted plaintiffs cross motion to amend the complaint so as to indicate that treble damages and attorneys’ fees were being sought under New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Law (Administrative Code of City of NY) § 26-413 (d) (1), and so as to add as an additional defendant the present tenant of the apartment, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the tenant’s cross motion insofar as it sought to amend the complaint to assert a cause of action under Administrative Code § 26-413 (d) (1), and to dismiss so much as the complaint as seeks relief under 9 NYCRR 2106.1, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The tenant alleges that the written agreement under which he surrendered the apartment in consideration of a sum of money was fraudulently induced by a prior notice of termination falsely stating that the landlords wanted the apartment for the immediate use of a family member and false contemporaneous oral representations to the same effect. Such specific allegations of a false present intent not to act as represented are sufficient to state a cause of action for fraud *(cf., New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co.,*87 NY2d 308, 318). However, the complaint fails to state a cause of action under Administrative Code § 26-413, which conditions relief of treble damages and attorneys’ fees for a landlord’s failure to make immediate and personal use of an apartment upon the issuance of a certificate of eviction by the Division of Housing and Community Re*412newal, never obtained by the landlords here. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFF RUSSELL TRAXTLE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

SHERRI HOLMAN, Library Coordinator,

Oregon Department of Corrections; DON

MILLS, Superintendent, DOC, Two

Rivers Correctional Institution,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-35063

D.C. No. 6:11-cv-06142-TC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Ann L. Aiken, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Oregon state prisoner Jeff Russell Traxtle appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing as time-barred his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a

FILED

JAN 03 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
violation of his constitutional right of access to the courts. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103,

1106 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Traxtle’s action as time-barred because

his access-to-courts claim accrued more than two years before he filed his

complaint. See Or. Rev. Stat. § 12.110(1) (two-year statute of limitations for

personal injury claims); Douglas, 567 F.3d at 1109 (for § 1983 claims, courts

apply the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury claims); Morales v.

City of Los Angeles, 214 F.3d 1151, 1154 (9th Cir. 2000) (an access-to-courts

claim accrues when the lower court issues its judgment in the underlying action,

not when the appeals of that judgment have been exhausted). 

Traxtle’s reliance on Christopher v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403 (2002), is

misplaced. 

AFFIRMED.

2 12-35063
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Omar T. MUHAMMAD, Appellant.

WD 80938

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 2, 2019

Ellen Flottman, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

*881Appellant Omar Muhammad was found guilty of murder in the second degree, armed criminal action, and receiving stolen property, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Muhammad appeals, claiming that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing two hearsay statements into evidence and erred when it denied his oral motion to sever the charges of second degree murder and armed criminal action from charges for burglary and possession of stolen goods. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).