alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION

280 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor East

New York, NY 10017




March 2, 2010




Allied Capital Corporation


1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW


Washington, D.C. 20006


Attention: John M. Scheurer



RE: Consent to Special Dividend



Dear Mr. Scheurer:



Pursuant to Section 5.2(b) of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2009 (the
“Agreement”), among Ares Capital Corporation (“Ares Capital”), ARCC Odyssey Corp.
and Allied Capital Corporation (“Allied Capital”), Ares Capital hereby consents to the
following proposed actions of Allied Capital:




	 	(1)	 	declaration of a dividend, to be paid in cash in an amount equal to $0.20 per share,
to stockholders of record of Allied Capital as of the date of the special meeting of
stockholders at which the Merger shall have been approved by the requisite affirmative
vote of the stockholders entitled to vote thereon, such dividend to be paid after the
Closing of the Merger as set forth in (3) below (the “Special Dividend”);






	 	(2)	 	establishment of the date of the special meeting of stockholders at which the Merger
shall have been approved by the requisite affirmative vote of the stockholders entitled to
vote thereon as the record date for the Special Dividend (the “Record Date”); and






	 	(3)	 	payment by Allied Capital of the aggregate amount of the Special Dividend to American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, in its capacity as dividend paying agent (the “Paying
Agent”), on the Closing Date, with instructions that the Paying Agent shall disburse
such amounts to Allied Capital stockholders as of the Record Date as promptly as
practicable after the Effective Time.





Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Agreement.



ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION



By: /s/ Joshua M. Bloomstein

Name: Joshua M. Bloomstein

Title: Authorized Signatory
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 69 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the dedication 

and devotion of law enforcement personnel should be recognized and 

that calls to ‘‘defund’’, ‘‘disband’’, ‘‘dismantle’’, or ‘‘abolish’’ the police 

should be condemned. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2023 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS (for herself, Mrs. MCCLAIN, Mr. FEENSTRA, Ms. SALAZAR, 

Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. CLYDE, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

CARL, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. 

GUEST, Mr. ISSA, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. KEAN of 

New Jersey, Mr. GIMENEZ, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, 

Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. CISCOMANI, Mrs. 

HARSHBARGER, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

OWENS, Mr. BOST, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER, Mr. 

LALOTA, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. STAUBER, Ms. VAN DUYNE, Mr. WILLIAMS

of New York, and Mr. CALVERT) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the dedication and devotion of law enforcement personnel 

should be recognized and that calls to ‘‘defund’’, ‘‘disband’’, ‘‘dismantle’’, or ‘‘abolish’’ the police should be 

condemned. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the House— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 69 IH 

1 (1) recognizes and appreciates the dedication 

2 and devotion demonstrated by the men and women 

3 of law enforcement who keep our communities and 

4 our Nation safe; and 

5 (2) condemns calls to ‘‘defund’’, ‘‘disband’’, 

6 ‘‘dismantle’’, or ‘‘abolish’’ the police. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 50-387 AND 50-388; NRC-2008-0246] 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Andrew Stuyvenberg, Projects  Branch 2, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop O-11F1, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Mr. Stuyvenberg may be contacted by telephone at 1-800-368-5642, extension 4006 or via e-mail at                         *andrew.stuyvenberg@nrc.gov.*

      ( print page 11979)    
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of March, 2009.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

David L. Pelton, 

Chief, Projects Branch 1,  Division of License Renewal,  Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

 [FR Doc. E9-6110 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

MAY 1 0 012 

OFFICE OF 

POUCY 

Dr. James Johnson, Chair 

National Advisory Council for 

Environmental Policy and Technology 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Dr. Johnson, 

On behalf of Administrator Lisa Jackson, I would like to thank you for your April 5, 2012, letter 

supporting EPA's adoption of the National Academy of Sciences' recommendations in its 

Sustainability and the US. EPA report, that EPA more fully incorporate sustainability 

considerations into its decision-making processes and day-to-day operations. 

Your letter is thoughtful and articulate and will be useful to us as we consider whether and how 

to adopt the particular recommendations. As you know, EPA also has just concluded a broad 

stakeholder listening process to get further input on this topic. 

Incorporating sustainability into the work of EPA will be an ongoing process. We look forward 

to receiving additional advice from NACEPT on the topic of sustainability, as was described in 

your letter. We really appreciate the opportunity to work with you on these issues. 

Sincerely, 

Bernice I. Corman 

Deputy Associate Administrator 

cc: Mark Joyce, NACEPT DFO 

Internet Address (URL) · http /lwww epa gov 


Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper
Fw: EPA response to OMB SO 2 NAAQS RIA recommendations

Lydia Wegman to: Tricia Crabtree 06/02/2010 06:50 PM

----- Original Message -----

From: Lydia Wegman

Sent: 05/28/2010 11:12 AM EDT

To: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Ron Evans; "Dominic Mancini" <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>

Subject: Re: EPA response to OMB SO2 NAAQS RIA recommendations

Jim,

I'm a bit confused. I sent you our responses, which I think you received. I 

wasn't sure if you needed more, like citations to where in the RIA we 

addressed the component issue, or if you wanted to talk to your management 

about our response. I'm going to need to turn my BB off now, as I'm on an 

airplane, but please let both me and Ron know, as Ron is in the office today. 

Thanks. 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Laity, James A." [James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: 05/28/2010 10:56 AM AST

To: Lydia Wegman

Cc: Ron Evans

Subject: RE: EPA response to OMB SO2 NAAQS RIA recommendations

Ron, We still haven't got your written response on the RIA comments,

just the unreadable code below. Can you resend? THx. -- jim

-----Original Message-----

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:30 PM

To: Laity, James A.

Subject: EPA response to OMB SO2 NAAQS RIA recommendations

--1inrT.4Xvf+SwfP.Eh1mj.E+ErgsH--
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00237-CV

MARY ALICE EMANUEL, 

ERVIN MITCHEL EMANUEL, 

SHIRLEY ANN RIVERS, 

JAMES EDWARD EMANUEL,

ROY LEONARD EMANUEL,

CLAUDIA FAY HASHEMI, AND

EVELYN M. DUPLESSIS

Appellant

v.

DARRELL EARL EMANUEL AND

CEDRIC ROYDELL EMANEUL,

Appellee

From the 87th District Court

Leon County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0-10-465

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E
IT IS ORDERED that Helen C. Wooten appear before this Court in the 

courtroom of the Tenth Court of Appeals, 501 Washington Avenue, Room 404, Waco, 

McLennan County, Texas, at 10:00 a.m., on Monday, April 13, 2015, to show cause and 

explain her delay in filing the reporter’s record in the above cause.

SIGNED March 19, 2015.

CHIEF JUSTICE PRESIDING
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00429-CV

ANTON HALEY, GORDON HALEY, AND ALL OCCUPANTS

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF THE 

RESIDENTIAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES TRUST V-D

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021CCV-61254-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. No costs are assessed, as appellants filed

an affidavit of inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 11, 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,386]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 25, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at ANP Dimensional Lumber, Ogema, Wisconsin.

The petitioners have requested that petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7146 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-41444

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL PEREZ-DE CRUZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Laredo

USDC No. 5:05-CR-778-ALL

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 11, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
----

----

| 1.     | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   | Conforce      International, Inc. |                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|   |                              |                                |   |
|   | By:                               | /s/ Mario      Verrilli        |   |
|   |                              | Mario      Verrillli                |   |
|   |                              | Acting      Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
Exhibit 31.3

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, James D. McGraw, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this 10-K/A of IronClad Encryption Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: April 30, 2018

|    |                                                                              | 
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|By: | /s/JAMES D. MCGRAW
James D. McGraw
President and
Principal Executive Officer | 





---
Exhibit 32.2













CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Entest BioMedical, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tammy L. Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:  November 12, 2010                  /s/ Tammy L. Reynolds


Tammy L. Reynolds


Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40444

Conference Calendar

 

LESLIE WAYNE JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHAWN TOLLEY, Officer; MITCH WOODS, 

Sheriff; DAVID MOORE, Major,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:01-CV-76

--------------------

April 10, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 Leslie Wayne Johnson (TDCJ # 108329) appeals the dismissal

as frivolous of his civil rights complaint wherein he alleged

that his constitutional rights were violated in connection with

his arrest and the subsequent revocation of his probation. We

DENY Johnson’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief.

 A prisoner’s in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights complaint

shall be dismissed if the district court determines that the

action is frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief
No. 01-40444

-2-

may be granted. Black v. Warren, 134 F.3d 732, 733 (5th Cir.

1998); see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We review the dismissal of a

complaint as frivolous for an abuse of discretion. See Berry v.

Brady, 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir. 1999). 

 "[I]n order to recover damages for [an] allegedly

unconstitutional conviction or imprisonment ... a § 1983

plaintiff must prove that the conviction or sentence has been

reversed on direct appeal ... or called into question by a

federal court’s issuance of a writ of habeas corpus[.]" Heck v.

Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Heck also applies to

proceedings that call into question the fact or duration of

probation. Jackson v. Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir. 1995). 

 Johnson does not allege that the probation-revocation

proceeding has been reversed or otherwise called into question,

and a judgment in his favor would necessarily imply the

invalidity of the proceedings. His appeal is without arguable

merit and is therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

 The district court’s dismissal of Johnson’s action as

frivolous counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th

Cir. 1996). The dismissal of the instant appeal also counts as a

strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Johnson is WARNED that if he

accumulates three strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he may

not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is
No. 01-40444

-3-

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See id. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; STRIKE WARNING ISSUED.
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Timothy A. DUNCAN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. ED 106669

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: July 9, 2019

Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Plaintiff/Respondent.

Casey A. Taylor, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Defendant/Appellant.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Robin Ransom, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

*906Timothy A. Duncan appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory sodomy in the first degree and child molestation in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne          
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Curtis W. Mewbourne        
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer   
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
Jimmy Lee GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4963

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kevin WASHINGTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. PINPOINT REALTY GROUP LLC, and Yiping Wu and Jin Zhang, husband and wife, Respondents.

Case No. 2D16-4666

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Buyrite Club Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Judith Adelstein, President, Director, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  By: /s/ Judith Adelstein Judith Adelstein, President, Director, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  March 14, 2012
| (1)   | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Dongsheng Pharmaceutical International Co., Ltd.. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: September 22, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Xiaodong Zhu       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Xiaodong Zhu                |   |
|                     |   | Principal Executive Officer |   |
[No. 30443-1-II.

Division Two.

May 25, 2004.]

#### Gerry Baum, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Social and Health Services, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 02-2-01102-8, Paula Casey, J., entered June 5, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., concurred in by Armstrong, J., and Seinfeld, J. Pro Tern.