alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Vanessa Marie Van

- Ness v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 3

- 0 060 7

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 1CR152 3

Trial court: 405th District Court of Galveston County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court on A ugust 21 , 2014. In the
abatement order, we directed the trial court to determine whether appellant wished to pursue the appeal, and if so, whether or not appellant ’s counsel

, James M. Bennett

, intended to abandon the appeal . The trial court held a hearing on our abatement order on September 4 , 201 4 . The court reporter has filed a reporter’s record of the hearing . T he district clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing t he trial court’s findings

and recommendations , stating that a ppellant wishes to p rosecute the appeal

, and appellant ’s counsel has not abandon ed the appeal , has been paid for the appeal, and will file appellant’s brief by October 4, 2014

. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the

Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than October 4, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of appella nt’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp
 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 22, 2014
[No. 52024-5-I.

Division One.

June 1, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ronald D. Stuivenga, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 94-1-00679-1, Linda C. Krese, J., entered March 11, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 31.2 

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, John Kurz, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Pilot Financial, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and 

 

(b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation. 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 17, 2004 

 

/s/ John Kurz 

John Kurz 

Executive Vice-President 

Chief Financial Officer
----

Action brought on 26 May 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-232/05)

(2005/C 171/20)

Language of the case: French

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 26 May 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Christophe Giolito, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The French authorities have not done what is necessary to ensure the correct, immediate and effective execution of the decision in accordance with national procedures, contrary to Article 14(1) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (1) which provides that the Member State is to take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary. The decision of the national court runs counter to its obligation to give practical effect to Community law, and under French law it is not possible to take interim measures to offset the automatic effect of the stay of proceedings.

The position of the French authorities appears to be contrary to the duty to cooperate in good faith as defined in Article 10 EC. France did not reply to the Commission's letter of 21 November 2003 despite three reminders and a meeting held between the Commission's DG Competition and the French authorities to go over the French cases of recovery of State aid. In particular, in spite of the fact that the Commission asked France several times for a copy of the order staying the proceedings, it never obtained one. The Commission therefore remains uncertain with regard to the exact progress of the recovery proceedings. That doubt is moreover increased by the fact that information obtained from unofficial sources in July 2004 by the Commission shows that the order staying the proceedings was never made, contrary to the assertions of the French authorities. In those circumstances, the Commission is unable to deal with the recovery in a spirit of cooperation in good faith as defined by the case-law of the Court.

----

(1)OJ L 83 of 27.03.1999, p. 1.

----
Bryan W. PLUMMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2531

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0445

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DUSTIN WADE SORLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 4, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2024

01/25/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0445
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

JULIE TRYBOSKI, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE 

UNIVERSITY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 137 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Local Rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that

have no pre cedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.”

Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-20023

Summary Calendar

CHARLES A. ATCHISON

Plaintiff-Appellant

VERSUS

HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, INC;

HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INC; JIMMY SLEDGE

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

June 13, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Appellant, a thirty-year employee of Appellee Houston

Lighting, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of Houston Lighting dismissing Plaintiff’s action against it

under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964 and the Texas law

concerning intentional infliction of emotional distress. We agree2

with the district court that Plaintiff has failed to create an

issue of material fact as to either his federal or state claims and

we affirm.

Appellant’s claim of race discrimination fails because, as the

district court correctly found, Appellant failed to present any

summary judgment evidence demonstrating that he has suffered an

adverse employment action. Alternatively, we agree with the

district court that Appellant has failed to create an issue of fact

that any adverse employment action he may have suffered was

m otivated by racial bias. Likewise, his racial harassment claim

fails because his evidence raisesf no issue of material fact that

the conduct of which he complains is either severe or perverse, or

creates a work environment that a reasonable person would find

either hostil e or abusive. His retaliation claim likewise fails

because he has created no issue of fact that he has suffered an

adverse employment action.

Plaintiff’s state law claim of intentional inflic t ion of

emotional distr e ss suffers a similar fate because Appellant’s

evidence does not raise issues of sever e emotional distress nor

that Defendants’ conduct was extreme or outrageous or that

Appellant’s reaction to that conduct was severe.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated by the district court, the

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 387-388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Mechanisms of Aging.
    Date: February 7, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

[[Page 388]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Nijaguna Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-496-9667, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b0502010a0c1e050a451b190a180a0f2b050203450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9df3f4f7fcfae8f3fcb3edeffceefcf9ddf3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 28, 2017.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-28416 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Darryl CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2998

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”), of FriendFinder Networks Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof I, Anthony Previte, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






FriendFinder Networks Inc.By:
/s/ Anthony PreviteName: Anthony PreviteChief Executive Officer




Date: August 7, 2013
ex10-4.htm


    Exhibit 10.4

     

    ASSIGNMENT
      OF MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS

     

    


     

    This
      Assignment of Membership Interests
      (this “Assignment”), dated this 8th day of
      November, 2007, is by and between Entek USA Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (“Assignor”), and Velocity Oil & Gas Inc., a
      Nevada corporation (“Assignee”).  Assignor
      and Assignee are collectively referred to herein as the
“Parties”, and are sometimes referred to individually
      as a “Party.”

     

    RECITALS

    


    WHEREAS,
      this
      Assignment is delivered pursuant to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement,
      dated as of November 8, 2007, between Assignor and Assignee (as the same may
      be
      amended, modified, supplemented or restated, the “Purchase and Sale
      Agreement”), wherein Assignor agreed to sell, and Assignee agreed
      to purchase, all of the outstanding membership interests in South Marsh LLC,
      a
      Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”) in
      accordance with the terms of such Purchase and Sale Agreement.

    


    ASSIGNMENT

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable
      consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
      the
      Parties hereby agree as follows:

    


    1.           Assignor
      hereby GRANTS, BARGAINS, SELLS and ASSIGNS all of the outstanding Membership
      Interests in the Company (the “Membership Interests”)
      to Assignee, and Assignor binds itself and its successors and assigns to warrant
      and forever defend, all and singular, the Membership Interests unto Assignee
      and
      its successors and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming
      or
      to claim the same or any part thereof by, through or under Assignor, but not
      otherwise.

     

    2.           Assignee
      hereby assumes all duties, obligations and liabilities of every kind and
      character with respect to the Membership Interests, whether arising before
      or
      after the date of this Assignment.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the Parties have executed this Assignment this 8th day of November
      2007.

     

    ASSIGNOR

     

    Entek
      USA
      Inc.

     

    By: /s/
      Russell
      Brimage                                                                    

     

    Russell
      Brimage, Director

     

    ASSIGNEE

    


    Velocity
      Oil & Gas Inc.

     

    By: /s/
      Frank A.Jacobs

     

    Frank
      A. Jacobs

     

    President
&
CEO
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ****


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of TXP Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Shores, Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TXP Corporation and will be retained by TXP Corporation and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





August
      7,
      2006


*/s/ Michael
                  Shores*Michael Shores
                  Chief
                          Executive*Officer (Principal Executive
                          Officer)*
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas, President and Chief Executive Officer of Triple-S ManagementCorporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2007 (theReport) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and;2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.        Date:      August 14, 2007 By:  /s/ Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas    Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas    *President and Chief Executive Officer*  
38
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2251

_____________________________

WILLIAM H. BELL,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

August 24, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

William H. Bell, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6467]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 147 Sixty Ninth Plenary: Minimum 
Operational Performance Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision 
Avoidance Systems Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 147 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 147: Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems Airborne 
Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 21, 2009 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, Suite 
805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 147 meeting and Working Group 
75. The agenda will include:
<bullet> Opening Plenary Session
    <bullet> WG-75 Chairman's opening remarks
    <bullet> SC-147 Co-Chairmen's opening remarks
    <bullet> Introductions
    <bullet> Approval of Agenda
    <bullet> Approval of Minutes from 68th meeting of SC147
<bullet> Final review and discussion of FRAC comments and 
consideration/final approval of Change 1 to DO-300 (Hybrid Surveillance 
MOPS)
<bullet> Final review and discussion of FRAC comments and 
consideration/final approval of Change 1 to DO-185B (TCAS II MOPS)
    <bullet> EUROCAE WG-75: Status of current activities
    <bullet> TCAS Program Office: TCAS Monitoring efforts
    <bullet> SC-218 Current status and planned deliverables
    <bullet> AVS status on TSO-C119c publication
    <bullet> Certification Authorities (USA and European) plans for 
Change 7.1 equipage
    <bullet> Closing Session (Other/new business.)
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 18, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-6467 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
----

NOTICE

On 29 April 2005, in Official Journal of the European Union C 104 A, the ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species — Second supplement to the 23rd complete edition’ was published.

On 11 May 2005, in Official Journal of the European Union C 111 A, the ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species — Third supplement to the 23rd complete edition’ was published.

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of these Official Journals as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order these Official Journals against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex.

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the annual report of Idle Media, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marcus Frasier, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Marcus Frasier


Marcus Frasier


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


January 12, 2011