alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Ping-Shun Lai, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, of Asia Global Holdings Corp.:





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: May 18, 2011
/s/ Ping-Shun LaiPing-Shun Lai, Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REGINALD ANTHONY FALICE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1)

Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 26, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Anthony Falice, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Felice appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to 

review his federal criminal sentence and his motion for a hearing. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Falice, 

No. 3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1   Certification of CEO
      and CFOPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant
      toSection 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofORGANA GARDENS INTERNATIONAL INC.for the
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Christopher Scheive, as the
equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Company,  hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:  (1)   The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  /s/Christopher ScheiveName: Christopher ScheiveDate: August 19,
2009  This
certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
1 Cite as: 579 U. S. ____ (2016)

B REYER , J., dissenting 

## SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

JOHN WAYNE CONNER v. ERIC SELLERS, WARDEN

ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 16–5230 (16A59) Decided July 14, 2016
The application for stay of ex ecution of sentence of death presented to J USTICE T HOMAS and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
J USTICE B REYER , dissenting from denial of certiorari and application for stay of execution. I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and application for stay of execut ion for the reasons stated in Conner v . Sellers , ante, p. ___ (Breyer, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari and applic ation for stay of execution).
EXHIBIT 99.5




Section 906
Certification


Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350




As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Ballard Power
Systems Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Canada (the “Company”),
for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 19, 2010
            /s/ John
      W. Sheridan
              John
      W. Sheridan
              President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Dated: March 19, 2010
            /s/ Bruce
      Cousins
              Bruce Cousins
              Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
      officer)
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sedrick Anthony Daughtery

, * From the 350 th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 14172

- D

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 347

- CR * June 6 , 202 4

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Jason Eric THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-433

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATINO EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND III SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,108
<PP&E>                                      10,125,812
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,284,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,221,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          576,466
<BONDS>                                      3,410,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     387,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,221,219
<SALES>                                        523,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               523,377
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  388,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               412,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (62,245)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (62,245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.70)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


          

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000748103
<NAME>    ABC DISPENSING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-26-1996
<CASH>                                         472,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  489,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   152,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,156,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,998,000
<PP&E>                                       1,507,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 821,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,053,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,756,000
<BONDS>                                        431,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,225,000
<COMMON>                                       171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (397,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,053,000
<SALES>                                      1,812,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,138,000
<CGS>                                        1,343,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,763,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,709,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,384,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,384,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,384,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)

        

</TABLE>
#### Martha Ellen Croker *et al. v.*John F. Brown, *Judge, etc., et al.*

(No. 7569)

Submitted February 16, 1933.

Decided February 21, 1933.

*E. L. Maxwell,*for petitioners.

*Joseph J. Madden,*for respondents.

Hatcher, Judge:

Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to prevent respondents from enforcing a judgment of the circuit court for $85.38 in favor of Warren PI. Davis against them.

Davis secured a judgment of $72.36 against one James Campbell before a justice, and upon an execution issued thereon, an automobile in the possession of Campbell was seized and advertised for sale. Thereupon, petitioners, Martha E., Croker and C. L. Croker, trustee, filed a bill in the circuit court alleging that she was the beneficiary and he was the trustee under a trust deed in which Campbell conveyed to him the above automobile, and that the deed was recorded prior to the rendition of the judgment against Campbell; and praying that the sale of the car be enjoined, and the ear placed *381in the custody of the trustee. The court decreed accordingly, upon the giving of bond for $300.00, conditioned according to law. The bond was executed by the Crokers, with petitioner E. L. Maxwell as security thereon. Subsequently, the bill was dismissed on demurrer. The court then included in the judgment against petitioners for costs and statutory damages, the full amount of the judgment- in favor of Davis against Campbell.

The ruling of the circuit court is based apparently on the provision of Code 1931, 53-5-12, as follows: “When an injunction to stay proceedings on a judgment * * * is dissolved, * * * the court or judge * * * shall ascertain and enter in the decree of dissolution the amount of principal, interest, damages and costs, including officer’s fees and commissions due on the judgment * * * at the date of the dissolution of the injunction.” So far the statute would seem to sustain the lower court, but it proceeds: “and shall award execution therefor against the defendant in the judgment * * * proceedings on which were enjoined.” Campbell was the defendant in the judgment, proceedings on which were enjoined. Consequently, it is obvious that the above provisions would apply if Campbell, the judgment debtor, had secured the injunction, but not when strangers to the judgment, like .the Crokers, have obtained it.

Counsel point to the requirement in Code, 53-5-9, that an injunction bond be conditioned to pay the judgment which is enjoined. This suit, however, is not a suit on the bond, and upon the mere dissolution of an injunction, a decree is entered under Code, 53-5-12, and not on the bond.

Therefore, the writ will issue, prohibiting the enforcement of so much of the judgment against petitioners as represents the judgment against Campbell.

*Writ issued.*
EXHIBIT
31
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
Phillip Jennings, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of Avalon Holding Group, Inc. (the
“Registrant”);
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I
have:
 
 a)
            designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
            evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and
 
 c)
            presented
      in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
      controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;
 
 5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):
 
 a)
            all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and
 
 b)
            any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
      controls; and
 
 6. I have
indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
 
 Date:  May
6, 2010
 
 
 By: 
/s/ Phillip
Jennings
 Phillip
Jennings
 Chief
Executive Officer, principal executive officer, principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: August 20, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: Region 7 , EPA SUBJECT: August 20 , 2014 , Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on August 2 0 , 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The majority of the discussion centered on how goals were e stablished for the states in Region 7 : Io wa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska

. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014
. **ATTENDEES** EPA Region 7: Mark A. Smith Ward Burns Toni Gargas Amy Bhesania Josh Tapp Mike Jay Io wa Department of Natural Resources Christine Paulson Kansas Department of Health and Environment Melissa Weide Miles Stotts Lynn Deahl Tom Gross Missouri Department of Natural Resources Mark Leath Emily Wilbur Paul Meyers Nebraska Department of Environmental QualityA dam Yarina
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 62 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 62

      Supporting the goals and ideals of a Juan Pablo Duarte Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2023

Mr. Espaillat submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Supporting the goals and ideals of a Juan Pablo Duarte Day.

Whereas the people of the Dominican Republic acquired autonomy and sovereignty 
        on the 27th day of February 1844;
Whereas the island of Quisqueya, the indigenous name for what later became the 
        island of Hispaniola, was the cradle of thinking and achievement in the 
        Western Hemisphere, establishing the first university and cathedral of 
        the New World;
Whereas, on the 26th day of January 1813, Juan Pablo Duarte, the founding father 
        of the Dominican Republic, was born;
Whereas, during the month of January 2023, Dominican Americans and citizens of 
        the Dominican Republic will celebrate the 210th anniversary of the birth 
        of Juan Pablo Duarte;
Whereas Juan Pablo Duarte, along with Francisco Del Rosario Sanchez and Ramon 
        Matias Melia, formed La Trinitaria, a secret organization that initiated 
        the movement for the independence of the Dominican Republic; and
Whereas, during the month of February 2023, Dominican Americans and citizens of 
        the Dominican Republic will celebrate the independence of the Dominican 
        Republic: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of the Juan Pablo Duarte 
        Day of the Dominican Republic;
            (2) supports the establishment of a national day of 
        recognition for Juan Pablo Duarte in the United States to honor 
        the founding father of the Dominican Republic; and
            (3) urges the people of the United States to observe a 
        national day of recognition for Dominican Americans with 
        appropriate ceremonies, programs, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,356] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 24, 2009 in response to a petition filed by the United Steel Workers, Local 1016-00, on behalf of workers of Wheatland Tube Company, Sharon, Pennsylvania. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9-6304 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P