alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             701,365
<SECURITIES>                                       150,355
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,480,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                       554,653
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,259,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         7,047,943
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,049,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,259,316
<SALES>                                          2,476,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,476,960
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   930,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   123,045
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,046,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    377,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                        86,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                290,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       290,689
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .18
<FN>
<F1>
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, I, Paul Parliament, Chief Executive Officer of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated.

Date: April 13, 2016.

/s/ Paul Parliament

Paul Parliament, President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before April 27, 2009 to be assured of consideration. 

## Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 

*OMB Number:*                     1545-2119.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Notice 2008-79, Tax-exempt Housing Bonds and 2008 Housing Legislation.                 

*Description:*                     This information is being requested from issuers of tax-exempt bonds who issue bonds subject to the new volume cap or utilize proceeds of mortgage revenue bonds to refinance certain qualified subprime mortgage loans, as provided in the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008, enacted July 30, 2008 (“2008 Housing Act”). We are asking issuers to report bonds issued pursuant to the new volume cap on existing form 8038 that is already required to be filed in connection with bond issues, and issuers of mortgage revenue bonds to attach a schedule to the 8038 providing a reasonable estimate of the total expected principal amount that will be utilized to refinance qualified subprime mortgage loans. We are asking issuers to file a second copy of an existing IRS Form 8328 in order to make the election to carry forward additional volume cap provided under the 2008 Housing Act that remains unused at the end of calendar year 2008.                 

*Respondents:*                     State Local, and Tribal Governments.                 

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     300 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     R. Joseph Durbala, (202) 622-3634, Internal Revenue Service,  Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Shagufta Ahmed, (202) 395-7873, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Celina Elphage, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

 [FR Doc. E9-6692 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EX PARTE Blake COFIELD

CR-15-1123

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 24, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
HOA PROBLEM SOLUTIONS 5, INC., as Trustee, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4434

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 625 

Recognizing the critical role of congressional staff and support staff working 

on Capitol Hill and in State or district offices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself, Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana, Mr. MORELLE, and 

Mr. STEIL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the critical role of congressional staff and support staff working on Capitol Hill and in State or district 

offices. 

Whereas there are nearly 15,000 congressional staff and 

thousands of support staff working on Capitol Hill and 

in State or district offices; 

Whereas congressional staff and support staff serve a critical 

role within the United States system of government by 

supporting the legislative branch; 

Whereas support staff serve as an essential resource and provide administrative, technical, and operational services to 

the congressional community of House of Representatives 

Members, officers, and staff; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 625 IH 

Whereas congressional staff work with constituents from 

their home States and districts to ensure that their constituents’ voices are heard and that their needs are represented; 

Whereas congressional staff help constituents navigate Federal agencies to resolve issues, such as the issuance and 

renewal of passports, adjudication of immigration cases, 

and applications for Social Security and veterans’ benefits; 

Whereas congressional staff help strengthen the bond between constituents and Members of Congress; 

Whereas congressional staff provide constituent services and 

help Congress solve the Nation’s most intractable challenges; 

Whereas congressional staff give back to the national capital 

region, as well as communities in their States and districts; 

Whereas congressional staff are faithful public servants who 

serve the public with the utmost respect and dignity; 

Whereas congressional staff deserve to work in a safe and 

healthy environment, as they do the people’s work; and 

Whereas congressional staff and support staff should be accepted, supported, and treated with respect and dignity: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the critical role of congressional 

3 staff and support staff working on Capitol Hill and 

4 in State or district offices; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 625 IH 

1 (2) thanks congressional staff and support staff 

2 for the commitment and essential services that they 

3 provide. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2010-0546

Directorate Identifier: 2009NM215AD

AMM MM-120/1459, R25 --- 9/28/09

AMM MM-120/1459, R26 --- 3/29/10

AMM 28-41-04 --- 9/28/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 22nd day of 

October, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Joe Ernest Lugo, Individually and 

Loving Touch Adult Daycare, Inc.,

Appellant,

v.

Irene Garza Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-15-00168-CV (Tr.Ct.No. CL-14-3875-F)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 22, 2015.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal 

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 1st day of December, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
Joseph Jair COLLINS v. STATE

CR-15-0427

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016 Reh. denied November 10, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ADAN USCANGA-GONZALEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-50034

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-03690-DMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2015**

Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Adan Uscanga-Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 30 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-50034

Uscanga-Gonzalez contends that the district court procedurally erred by

failing to explain adequately the upward variance and failing to consider or address

his sentencing arguments. We review for plain error, see United States v. 

Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The 

record reflects that the district court considered Uscanga-Gonzalez’s arguments 

and sufficiently explained the reasons for imposing the above-Guidelines sentence. 

See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Contrary 

to Uscanga-Gonzalez’s contention, the court did not err by using his previous 

sentence for the same offense as a benchmark. See United States v. 

Higuera-Llamos, 574 F.3d 1206, 1211-12 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Uscanga-Gonzalez next contends that the sentence is substantively 

unreasonable in light of the mitigating factors and the alleged procedural errors, 

and because the district court relied upon disputed facts underlying a previous state 

conviction. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing 

Uscanga-Gonzalez’s sentence. See Gall United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). 

The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including 

Uscanga-Gonzalez’s immigration history. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; see also 
3 14-50034

United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The 

weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the 

district court.”). Moreover, the court’s reliance on the disputed facts does not 

render the sentence unreasonable because Uscanga-Gonzalez has not shown that 

the disputed facts were false or unreliable. See United States v. Vanderwerfhorst, 

576 F.3d 929, 935-36 (9th Cir. 2009). 

AFFIRMED.
Maria PIKUTA-WILKINSON, Appellant, v. Jan KISZKA, by and through Derek Byerly, Guardian of Jan Kiszka Appellee.

No. 4D17-660

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| |                                        |          
| | -------------------------------------- | ---------
| | **KPMG
      LLP**                     | Telephone
| | **Chartered
      Accountants**        | Fax      
| | PO Box 10426 777
      Dunsmuir Street | Internet 
| | Vancouver BC V7Y
      1K3             |          
| | Canada                                 |          





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors ofBallard
Power Systems Inc.

We consent to the inclusion in this annual
report on Form 40-F of:

- our Report of Independent Registered Public
  Accounting Firm dated February 22, 2012 on the consolidated statements of
  financial position of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (the Company) as at
  December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, and the consolidated
  statements of comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows for each of
  the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011;
- our Report of Independent Registered Public
  Accounting Firm dated February 22, 2012on the Companys internal control over
  financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,

each ofwhich is contained in this annual report on
Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

We also consent to incorporation by
reference of the above mentioned audit reports in the Companys Registration
Statements (No. 333-156553 and 333-161807) on Form S-8.

KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited
      liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMGnetwork of
      independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International
      Cooperative(KPMG International), a Swiss entity.KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG
  LLP.


---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40066 

Conference Calendar

GERALD DEWEY HENDERSON, I,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHNNY MASON, Dentist; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; UTMB; SHERA L. AVANT,

Mailroom; POLUNSKY UNIT MAILROOM STAFF; MRS. HASTINGS, Polunsky

Parole Worker; MRS. PRIMROSE; MR. MCKEE, Law Library Worker; MRS.

PUTMAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:05-CV-104

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerald Dewey Henderson, I, Texas inmate # 1105393, appeals

the dismissal of his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also

moves for the appointment of counsel. Because Henderson’s appeal

presents no “exceptional circumstances,” his motion for

appointment of counsel is denied. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691

F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). 
No. 06-40066

-2-

Henderson’s complaint named several defendants, including

the mailroom staff at his prison unit. The district court

dismissed the action without prejudice because Henderson failed

to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to file an amended

pleading containing a short and plain statement setting forth his

claims. 

Henderson asserts that he prepared an amended pleading and

presented it for mailing. He contends that the mailroom staff

destroyed the pleading in retaliation for being named as

defendants. Henderson argues that his amended pleading should be

considered filed under the prison mailbox rule. See Spotville v.

Cain, 149 F.3d 374, 377-78 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Henderson has not shown that the district court abused its

discretion in dismissing his action without prejudice. See

McNeal v. Papasan, 842 F.2d 787, 789-90 (5th Cir. 1988). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended(49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2009-0059.                

*Date Filed:*                     March 4, 2009.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     TC12 North Atlantic—Africa (except between USA and Reunion), TC12 Mid Atlantic—Middle East, TC12 South Atlantic—Middle East, Resolutions and Specified Fares Tables (Memo 0276),                

*Minutes:*                     TC12 North, Mid, South Atlantic—Middle East, TC12 North, Mid, South Atlantic—Africa (Memo 0295/0278),                

*Intended effective date:*                     1 May 2009.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2009-0060.                

*Date Filed:*                     March 4, 2009.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     TC12 North Atlantic—Africa between USA and Reunion, Resolutions and Specified Fares Tables (Memo 0277),                

*Minutes:*                     TC12 North, Mid, South Atlantic—Middle East, TC12 North, Mid, South Atlantic—Africa (Memo 0295/0278),                

*Intended effective date:*                     1 May 2009.                

 Renee V. Wright,

 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-6600 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of TXP Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael C. Shores,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TXP Corporation and will be retained by TXP Corporation and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





August
      19, 2008





*/s/ Michael
                C. Shores*Michael
                C. Shores
              Chief
                Executive**Officer*(Principal Executive
                Officer)*