alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Entest BioMedical, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Koos, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:  December 21, 2010                 /s/ David R. Koos


David R. Koos


Chief Executive Officer
[No. 51921-2-I.

Division One.

May 3, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stig August Swanson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-05890-2, Ronald Kessler, J., entered January 29 and April 15, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose ALMODOVAR, DC #Y57100, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-3003

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officers of Radiant Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




DATE: May 16, 2011




BY:
/s/ Bohn H. CrainChief Executive Officer
 BY:
/s/ Todd E. MacomberChief Financial Officer


This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiant Logistics, Inc. and will be retained by Radiant Logistics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Nicolas David WRIGHT, Appellee.

Case Nos. 5D16-3709 5D16-3710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Texas Mineral Resources Corp. 10-K



Exhibit
32.2



Exhibit
32.2. Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Texas Mineral Resources Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended
August 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wm Chris
Mathers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/
    Wm Chris Mathers                      | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|Wm
    Chris Mathers, Chief Financial Officer
|December
    14, 2018                        



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Horace ASH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4217

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6843]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Meeting; Sunshine Act

March 20, 2009.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, March 26, 2009.

Place: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Peter J. Phillips v. A&S Construction Co., 
Docket No. WEST 2008-1057-DM. (Issues include whether, under section 
105(c)(2) of the Mine Act, an order of temporary reinstatement remains 
in effect after the Secretary of Labor has determined, following her 
investigation, that no unlawful discrimination has occurred.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and Sec.  2706.160(d).

Contact Person for More Info: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 
for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 [FR Doc. E9-6843 Filed 3-24-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the
period ended September 30, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 and;2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 Date:      October 30, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Ramón M. Ruiz-ComasRamón M. Ruiz-ComasPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1 

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, JOHN F. KURZ, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of R J Lending, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedure as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: September 14, 2003
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyTreasurer and Principal Accounting OfficerDate:  August 16, 2004This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Renall T. Becker, Respondent, v Carmelita J. Mix, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 498]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from an order *774and judgment of the Supreme Court (Relihan, Jr., J.), entered April 26, 2000 in Tompkins County, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

In April 1994, plaintiff purchased a specially designed diamond ring together with matching wedding bands and gave the diamond ring to defendant during a dinner date. At the time plaintiff gave the ring to defendant she admits the parties became engaged to each other and “[tjhere was contemplation of marriage.” During the ensuing three years the ring was passed back and forth between the parties because of disagreements and soon thereafter the parties’ relationship ended. When defendant refused plaintiffs request to return the ring, plaintiff commenced this action seeking its return or its fair market value. Defendant answered claiming, *inter alia,*that ownership of the ring had been settled by settlement agreements on December 6, 1996 and April 7, 1997. Plaintiff thereafter moved for summary judgment and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment. Finding that the ring was given in contemplation of marriage, Supreme Court granted plaintiffs motion and denied defendant’s cross motion. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.

Plaintiffs proof submitted in support of his motion demonstrated that he gave the engagement ring to defendant in contemplation of their marriage and was entitled to its return or its value upon the termination of their engagement (see, Civil Rights Law § 80-b; *Gaden v Gaden,*29 NY2d 80; *Leshowitz v Conklin,*245 AD2d 343). Defendant’s conclusory assertion that she accepted the diamond ring out of friendship and never intended to marry plaintiff is patently insufficient to overcome plaintiffs proof.

Nor does the record reflect any proof of the December 6, 1996 or April 7, 1997 settlement agreements which were pleaded as affirmative defenses to plaintiffs action.

Cardona, P. J., Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Timothy C. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106426

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: February 26, 2019

FOR APPELLANTS: William J. Swift, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.

FOR RESPONDENTS: Daniel N. McPhearson, Eric Schmitt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Timothy Wright appeals the denial following an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on a single allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. He contends the motion court clearly erred by denying his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call his wife, Tiffany Pulliam, as a trial witness, to testify that he was at their apartment between 4:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. on February 15, 2014. We disagree and affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.1


 


Form of 3M 2010 Performance Share Award


 


SUBJECT: MESSAGE FROM
GEORGE BUCKLEY: YOUR 3M 2010 PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD


 


FIRST & LAST
NAME        EMPLOYEE #


 


This is the second of two
letters you will receive concerning your 3M 2010 Performance Share award.  The purpose of this letter is to provide you
with the number of contingent shares actually assigned to you as your 2010
award. The number of contingent shares was calculated by dividing the target
value of your performance share award by the Grant Date Fair Value of 3M stock
on March 1, 2010 ($74.47).


 


The Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors has approved the following 3M Performance
Share award to be issued under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
effective March 1, 2010:


 


AWARD YEAR: 2010


AWARD DESCRIPTION: ANNUAL
AWARD


TARGET VALUE: $xxx,xxx


NUMBER OF CONTINGENT
SHARES: x,xxx


 


Performance Shares issued
under the LTIP are a significant part of your total compensation as a 3M
executive.  Performance Shares reward
your leadership and commitment in managing 3M’s business for sustainability and
improved results over time.


 


The 2010 award will
compensate you for the results we achieve against corporate financial goals
over the three-year period 2010, 2011 and 2012.


 


The maximum payout will
be 2 times the number of contingent shares assigned to you at the time of the
award. Your 2010 award will be governed by the provisions of the LTIP plan
document, and will be paid out in March 2013 unless you elected to defer
the payout under the 3M Performance Awards Deferred Compensation Plan.


 


The three performance
measures for the 2010 award are Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) versus
target, 3M Organic Sales Growth versus the Worldwide Industrial Production
Index (IPI) and New Product Vitality Index versus target.  For more information about the metrics and
how Performance Shares issued under the LTIP Plan will work, please review the
brochure entitled “Understanding Your 2010 3M Performance Share Grant Issued
under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan - Effective March 1, 2010”, which
was sent to you via an earlier email.


 


 

















 


Please note that at their
Annual Meeting in May, 3M’s stockholders will be asked to approve the use of
the New Product Vitality Index as a performance measure for performance share
awards under the LTIP.  If 3M’s
stockholders do not approve the use of the New Product Vitality Index, the
Compensation Committee would need to decide how to adjust your 2010 Performance
Share award.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                Lester C Knight
                              1414 Edgehill Drive
                             Chula Vista, CA 91913


December 16, 2007

VIA FACSIMILE

Mr. Peter Kuhn
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Bullion River Gold Corp.
3500 Lakeside Court, Suite 200
Reno NV, 89509

Dear Peter,

This letter will serve as notice that I am resigning my position on the Board of
Directors of Bullion River Gold Corp., effectively immediately. I have recently
taken on additional responsibilities within my company that does not afford me
adequate time to serve Bullion River Gold Corp. in a manner that I believe would
be expected and necessary for the position. I would like to thank you for the
opportunity to work with you and Susan during the last two years and wish you
much success in the future.

Best Regards,

/s/ Lester C. Knight
--------------------
Lester C. Knight
Luisa GUILLEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0785

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0196

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DUSTIN LEE LEGARE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 21, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 12 2020

08/12/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0196
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
(collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                  
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 15, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephanie D. Lepori                                                                                          
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Stephanie D. Lepori, Chief Financial Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,061]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 2, 2009 in response to a petition filed by the Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Union, Local 364, on behalf of workers at Gemeinhardt Company, LLC, Elkhart, Indiana.

The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6522 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE
[No. 52314-7-I.

Division One.

May 10, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Crystal M. Tampico, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-8-03084-1, Dale B. Ramerman and Suzanne M. Barnett, JJ., entered May 8, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                            
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  |    
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano                                                                                         
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Gary L. Carano Chief Executive Officer of Circus and
Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
Mirsad HAMIDOVIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81173

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: January 29, 2019

S. Kate Webber, for Appellant.

Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Mirsad Hamidovic pleaded guilty to one count of murder in the second degree in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Hamidovic later filed a timely Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief arguing that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary because it failed to establish factually specific conduct for each element *269of the charged crime. The Circuit Court denied Hamidovic's motion following an evidentiary hearing. Hamidovic appeals from that judgment. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).