alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENT OF
NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION OF DAMSON BIRTCHER REALTY INCOME FUND I AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         486,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  258,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               943,000
<PP&E>                                      35,798,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,741,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,695,000
<BONDS>                                      2,782,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,264,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,741,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>STATEMENT OF OPERATION IS NOT PRESENTED IN LIQUIDATION BASIS OF ACCOUNTING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Cognos Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Robert G. Ashe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Tom Manley, Senior Vice President, Finance & Administration and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|July 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Robert G. Ashe                                   
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|              |  |                                                      
|Date          |  | Robert G. Ashe,
President and Chief Executive Officer

|July 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Tom Manley                                                                                                                                               
|------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|              |  |                                                                                                                                                              
|Date          |  | Tom Manley
Senior Vice President, Finance &
    Administration and Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
    Officer)

This certification is being submitted
solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section, nor will the certification be deemed incorporated by reference in to any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to
the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

86
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6333
MIKE DAVID HICKMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LLOYD WATERS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Mary land, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1189-H) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Mike David Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hickman v. Waters , No. CA-97-1189-H (D. Md. Feb. 17, 1998). We decline to consider Appellant's claim that his arrest warrant was invalid because this claim was not presented to the district court and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. See Spencer v. Murray , 5 F.3d 758, 761-62 (4th Cir. 1993).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Shannon D. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, and Florida Department of Corrections, Respondents.

CASE NO. 1D17-3936

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
Amendment to Executive Severance Agreement btw the Company and Edward C. Albini



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE BENEFIT AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE BENEFITS AGREEMENT
(this “Amendment”) is entered into this 17 day of December, 2007 (the “Effective Date”), between EDWARD C. ALBINI (“Executive”) and NOVACEA,
INC. (the “Company”) and amends, to the extent provided herein, that certain Executive Severance Benefits Agreement entered into between Executive and the Company as of April 13, 2006 (the
“Agreement”). This Amendment to the Agreement, together with the Agreement, constitutes the entire Agreement as amended through the Effective Date. 
 1. Change of Control Severance Benefits. Effective as of the Effective Date, Section 3.2(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “(a) Base Salary. The Company shall pay to Executive an amount equal to twelve (12) months’ Base Salary. Subject to Section 3.3
hereof, the severance benefit contemplated by this Section 3.2(a) shall be paid in cash in a lump sum within thirty (30) days following the Covered Termination and shall be subject to all required tax and other applicable
withholding.” 
 2. No Other Changes. Except as provided in this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer and Executive has executed this
Amendment as of the Effective Date. 
  

									
	NOVACEA, INC.	 		 	EDWARD C. ALBINI
					
	By:	 	/s/ John P. Walker	 		 		 	/s/ Edward C. Albini
					
	Name:	 	John P. Walker	 		 		 	
					
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 11895 on behalf of Turin Aviation Group

(Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1031) 

Dear Sir or Madam,

This is a request for an amendment to the existing Section 333 Exemption No. 11895 

to add additional aircraft to the exemption-holder’s authorized commercial operations. On 

June 25, 2015, the FAA granted this Petition for Exemption to operate small unmanned 

aircraft systems for the purpose of power and pipeline patrol, precision agriculture, mining 

survey, railroad survey, education, research and development. Turin Aviation Group now 

seeks an amendment to its exemption authorizing the operation of additional aircraft as 

described in the confidential and proprietary operations manuals submitted in support of 

this amendment request. 

The additional aircraft have been previously approved for operations in other 333 

exemptions; the Enduro (Exemption No. 12098 to Agribotix LLC,) the Phantom3 and the 

Inspire1 (Exemption No. 11250A to Videe This!).

We are prepared to modify or amend any part of this request to satisfy the requirements 

of the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, or any government 

referent. We look forward to working with your office. Please contact us at any time if you 

require additional information or clarification.

Very Respectfully,

Matthew C. Ippolito 

Chief Pilot

Zephyrhills Municipal Airport 

39450 South Ave

Hangar 200

Zephyrhills, FL 33542

Tampa Executive Airport

6530 Tampa Executive Airport Road 

Suite 223

Tampa FL 33610
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Damien Baker SHAW, Appellant.

WD 80321

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: January 30, 2018

Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Christian Lehmberg, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

*90Damien Shaw ("Shaw") appeals his conviction for armed criminal action, section 571.015, in conjunction with his conviction for attempted robbery in the first-degree, section 569.020. His sole point on appeal alleges that armed criminal action cannot be predicated on an attempt offense. We affirm. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 23.2








Consent of Independent Auditors





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-222637) pertaining to the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan of Americold Realty Trust of our reports dated March 10, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of China Merchants Americold Holdings Company Limited and China Merchants Americold Logistics Company Limited, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Americold Real Trust for the year ended December 31, 2017.











/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming LLP





Shenzhen, the People’s Republic of China


March 29, 2018
Fw: Ready to go to OMB when necessary RobertJ Wayland to: Cortney_Higgins 11/15/2012 04:38 PM Cc: Bill Maxwell

Cortney -

Attached is the revised floor memo. We'll send the preamble over shortly redlined against what originally came to you, so it will be obvious where the PM CPMS language was adjusted. Since this language spills over into the regulatory text, it's not a simple edit to pull it all out. Bill's going to work on that request and get you something later; however, at least this way you can see all the other changes asap.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt ********************************************************* ----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/15/2012 04:37 PM

-----

From: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/15/2012 04:03 PM Subject: Ready to go to OMB when necessary

DRAFT_Reconsider_EGU_MACT_Floor_Memo_redline_110612 vs 111512.pdf

DRAFT_Reconsider_EGU_MACT_Floor_Memo_111512.pdfDeliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
Henry MCGALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-905

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3841 — Valoriza Gestion/Aguas de las Palmas)

(2005/C 187/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Patricia L. HODGSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David R. HODGSON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1965

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Mary A. Bracero, Petitioner, v H. Carl McCall, as Comptroller of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 338]

Crew III, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s application for ordinary disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a secretary for the Port Authority of the State of New York and New Jersey, developed bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome and subsequently underwent surgery therefor. Claiming that the surgery was unsuccessful, petitioner there*756after filed applications for ordinary disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law articles 14 and 15. Although petitioner’s application for article 14 benefits was granted, her application for article 15 benefits was denied following a hearing. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the latter determination.

There is no merit to petitioner’s claim that by granting her application for Retirement and Social Security Law article 14 benefits, respondent Comptroller was collaterally estopped from denying her article 15 application. Petitioner was entitled to article 14 benefits when it was determined that she was “eligible for primary social security disability benefits” (Retirement and Social Security Law § 506 [a]), while her entitlement to article 15 benefits was dependent upon the Comptoller’s finding that petitioner was “physically or mentally incapacitated for the performance of gainful employment” (Retirement and Social Security Law § 605 [c]). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that, in the context of her article 14 application, respondent State and Local Employees Retirement System had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the identical issue that was raised by her article 15 application. Therefore, the doctrine of collateral estoppel is inapplicable *(see generally, Matter of Tischmann [ITT Sheraton Corp.*— Commissioner *of Labor],*256 AD2d 949, 951).

Although petitioner claims that a Port Authority physician examined her, found her disabled and precluded her from returning to work, petitioner offered neither the physician’s testimony nor the letter she claims he wrote. The testimony of the orthopedic and neurological experts for the Retirement System who, upon examining petitioner, found no objective evidence that would lead them to conclude that she was disabled from performing her duties, provided substantial evidence to support the Comptroller’s determination, despite the conflicting testimony from petitioner’s treating physician *(see, Matter of Pietricone v McCall,*243 AD2d 929, *lv denied*91 NY2d 804). The determination must, therefore, be confirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

As of
December 31, 2009



|                                                        |  |             
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Company Name                                            |  | Jurisdiction
|Gulf of Mexico Personnel Services, S. de R. L. de C. V. |  | Mexico      
|Mexico Drilling Limited LLC                             |  | Delaware    
|Mexico Offshore Management, S. de R. L. de C. V.        |  | Mexico      
|Central America Drilling LLC                            |  | Delaware    
|Peninsula Drilling LLC                                  |  | Delaware    
|Seahawk Drilling de Mexico LLC                          |  | Delaware    
|Seahawk Mexico Holdings LLC                             |  | Delaware    
|Redfish Holdings, S. de R. L. de C. V.                  |  | Mexico      
|Seahawk Drilling Management LLC                         |  | Delaware    
|Seahawk Offshore Management LLC                         |  | Delaware    
|Energy Supply International LLC                         |  | Delaware    
|Seahawk Drilling LLC                                    |  | Delaware    
|Seahawk Global Holdings LLC                             |  | Delaware
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6555]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 52-033-COL; ASLBP No. 09-880-05-COL-BD01]


Detroit Edison Company; Establishment of Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 
2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the 
following proceeding:

Detroit Edison Company

(Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3)
    This proceeding concerns a Petition to Intervene and Request for 
Hearing dated March 9, 2009 from Beyond Nuclear, et al., that was 
submitted in response to a January 8, 2009 Notice of Hearing and 
Opportunity to Petition for Leave to Intervene on a Combined License 
for the Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3 (74 FR 836). The petitioners 
challenge the application filed by Detroit Edison Company pursuant to 
Subpart C of 10 CFR Part 52 for a combined license for Fermi Nuclear 
Power Plant, Unit 3, which would be located in Monroe County, Michigan.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

    Ronald M. Spritzer, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    Michael F. Kennedy, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    Randall J. Charbeneau, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in 
August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of March 2009.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge,Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-6555 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Frank J. STALLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 82099 C/w WD 82100

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 30, 2019

James C. Egan, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Frank J. Stallo appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion which claimed that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate bank transactions that could have been exculpatory. Because trial counsel's performance was not deficient and no prejudice was established in any event, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
# United States Court **of Appeals** 
**f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 30024

**In the Matter of: Sharon Sylvester,**

Debtor **,**
**Sharon Sylvester,**

Appellant **,**

versus

**Barbara Rivera**

**- Fulton,** 

Appellee

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:2 1

- CV

- 1083

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Sharon Sylvester went bankrupt. At the end of her Chapter 7 proceeding, the bankruptcy court ordered her to pay certain fees to the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 30, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 22

- 30024

2 trustee and a law firm that assisted the trustee. The p resent appeal involves the bankruptcy court’s award of fees to the trustee.

In affirming the award of fees to the trustee , the district court principally relied on its prior opinion awarding fees to the law firm. In re Sylvester , No. 20

- CV

- 2469, 2021 WL 807248 (E.D. La. Mar. 2, 2021). The next month, however, we vacated and remanded the award of attorney’s fees, concluding that the bankruptcy court applied the wrong legal standard

. See Matter of Sylvester , 23 F.4th 543 (5th Cir. 2022) . Because the questions regarding fees in both matters are intertwined , we **VACATE** and

**REMAND** for further proceedings consistent our recent decision.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

/s/ Greg Holsted

Greg Holsted, Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 13, 2003