alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Paul PINKSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3341

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,226]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 11, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of the workers at Formtek, Inc., Clinton, Maine.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7143 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5307-N-01]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Through this notice, HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the allocation formula, allocation amounts, list of grantees, statutory and regulatory program requirements, submission deadlines, and other requirements for the Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) authorized by Title XII of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-05, approved February 17, 2009). HPRP funding is focused on providing short- and medium-term rental assistance to individuals and families who are currently in housing, but at risk of becoming homeless, and individuals and families who are homeless. Approximately $1.489 billion will be allocated for these purposes to states, metropolitan cities, urban counties and territories. State sub-grantees and non-profit sub-grantees are also eligible to receive HPRP funds from grantees. The notice establishing the program and application requirements for these funds, allocation information, and eligibility criteria is available on the HUD Web site at:                         *http://www.hud.gov/​recovery/​homeless-prevention.cfm*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ann Marie Oliva, Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs, Office of Special Needs Assistance, Office of Community Planning and Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington DC 20410-3000; telephone 1-800-998-9999. Hearing- or speech-impaired individuals may access the voice telephone number listed above by calling the toll-free                               ( print page 14576)                            Federal Information Relay Service during working hours at 800-877-8339.                    

Dated: March 25, 2009.

Nelson R. Bregón,

General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development.

 [FR Doc. E9-7182 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
TS-CKHI01

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d 

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter 
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0680

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

REX WILLIAM ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 26, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2024

01/18/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0680
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 61338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28115]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; National Science Board

    The National Science Board's Committee on National Science and 
Engineering Policy (SEP), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 
614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-
5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby 
gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction 
of National Science Board business, as follows:

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 4:30-5:30 p.m. EST.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. An 
audio link will be available for the public. Members of the public must 
contact the Board Office to request the public audio link by sending an 
email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f59b94819c9a9b949986969c909b9690978791b59b8693db929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f896998c91979699948b9b919d969b9d9a8a9cb8968b9ed69f978e">[email protected]</span></a> at least 24 hours prior to the 
teleconference.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Discussion of Policy Companion Statement to 
Science and Engineering Indicators 2018.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Mateo Munoz (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5b8b8a0bbbaaf95bba6b3fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a77776f7475605a74697c347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Meeting information and updates (time, place, subject matter or 
status of meeting) may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices/.jsp#sunshine. Please refer to the National Science Board 
website www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional information.

Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2017-28115 Filed 12-22-17; 5:10 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Ah Lain Saing KAYLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2485

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

November 13, 2014

Hon. Michael R. Cowen

The Cowen Law Group

62 E. Price Road

Brownsville, TX 78521 Hon. Elsa Giron Nava

Tort Litigation Division

P.O. Box 12548, Mail box 030

Austin, TX 78711

- 2548

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00590

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. C

- 3223

- 12

- C

Style: Texas Department of Public Safety v. Raquel Guzman

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.

cc: 139th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. Laura Hinojosa , Hidalgo County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr. , Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND III JUNE 30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,044
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (360,902)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,044
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,494)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,494)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,494)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,107]


Hol-Mac Corporation; Bay Springs, MS; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 4, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by workers of Hol-Mac Corporation, Bay Springs, 
Mississippi.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 16th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7135 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Christopher Daniel WINCHCOMBE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5552

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
MELVIN B. THOMPSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5417

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 12, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

Melvin B. Thompson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren L. Brudnicki, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Patrick J. MCCARTHY and D. Michael Tully, Appellants, v. Timothy WILSON, Respondent.

No. ED 106270

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: October 16, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 19, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 29, 2019

FOR APPELLANTS: Eric Kendall Banks, 308 N. 21st Street, Ste. 401, St. Louis, MO 63103.

FOR RESPONDENT: David P. Bub, 800 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Patrick J. McCarthy and D. Michael Tully (collectively "Plaintiffs") appeal the trial court's judgment, (1) granting defendant Timothy Wilson's ("Defendant") motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims for abuse of process and malicious prosecution; and (2) denying Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment as to Defendant's liability for the aforementioned claims.

*202No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court's judgment is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MISTY DAVIS AND DONOVAN D. DAVIS,

Appellants,

v.

Case No. 5D21-2602 

LT Case No. 2014-CA-008596-O 

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 

AS TRUSTEE TO MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE 

INVESTORS TRUST MORTGAGE LOAN ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-HEI, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed December 2, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County, 

Donald A. Myers, Jr., Judge. 

James Sweeting, III , of James Sweeting, 

III, LLC, Baltimore, MD, for Appellants. 

Hallie S. Evans, of Troutman Pepper 

Hamilton Sanders LLP, Atlanta, GA, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LAMBERT, C.J., SASSO and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carroll Shelby International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carroll Shelby, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: August 18, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ CARROLL SHELBYCarroll Shelby, Director
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Javier Reynaldo WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3405

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daleco Resources Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the "Report")
dated August 15, 2005, I, Gary J. Novinskie, President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                          /s/ Gary J. Novinskie
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Gary J. Novinskie
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
                                          August 15, 2005
Keon WILLIAMS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1398

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Anthony B. MCCULLOUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1719

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 10, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<page>                       EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		August 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF AMENDED PERIODIC REPORT I, Robert Waters, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Avalon Gold Corporation, a Nevada Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 19, 2004

/s/ Robert Waters
---------------
Robert Waters
President and Chief Executive Officer
Darious Lashun BRIGGS v. STATE

CR-15-0714

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### VAN AMERINGEN-HAEBLER, Inc., v. HELVERING.

No. 31.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1942.

*856Before L. HAND, SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

John F. Condon, Jr., and Rogers & Con-don, all of New York City (Jack M. Evans, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.

Muriel S. Paul, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Helen R. Carloss, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Commissioner asks that the case be remanded to the Tax Court in order that it may be reconsidered in the light of the § 501(a) of the Revenue Act of 1942, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, which amended § 14(a) (2) and § 26(c) of the Revenue Act of 1936, and added subdivisions (f) and (g) to § 26 of that Act; § 501 (b) of the Act of 1942 having made these changes retroactive. Since the whole case was tried upon the assumption that the taxpayer’s liability depended upon the law as-it stood before 1942, it is obviously appropriate, if not necessary, that it should! be heard anew. Indeed, it might be argued that this course was logically inevitable if we sit to correct errors, for the Tax Court’s order was right when it was made. Be that as it may, every consideration of equity demands that it should' be heard at a time when the controlling" law is known to the parties.

It is nevertheless appropriate for us to consider the correctness of the order as of the time of its entry; and as to that we have no doubt. The provision in the-mortgage did not “expressly” or otherwise forbid the payment of dividends upon the-preferred shares, and § 26(c) (1) for that-reason was not an excuse. It is true that, because it was bound to make the amortization payments the company could not pay any dividend on the preferred shares without exposing itself to the risk of foreclosure. It was indeed a great hardship-to tax it on the theory that it withheld a distribution which practically it could not make; but it was no greater a hardship-than that imposed upon the taxpayer in Helvering v. Northwest Steel Mills, 311 U.S. 46, 61 S.Ct. 109, 85 L.Ed. 29. The truth is that the excuses allowed did not go-far enough to confine the statute to its real purpose, as to some extent Congress has now belatedly recognized in the Act of 1942. We do not suggest that that recognition will relieve the taxpayer here; we-leave that question entirely open; but we-do say that it has nothing else upon which to rely. We need say no more as to §, 26(c) (2) than to refer to our discussion of that section in Helvering v. Magnus Beck Brewing Company, 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 379.

The order will be reversed and the cause-remanded to the Tax Court for reconsideration in accordance with the foregoing.

Order reversed.
Ricky VARNER v. STATE

CR-15-1120

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.