alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Donna MYRICK v. STATE

CR-15-1140

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6920

MATTHEW DETZLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KIM COX, Treatment Program Supervisor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:10-cv-00552-GBL-TCB)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Detzler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Detzler appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Detzler v. Cox, No. 

1:10-cv-00552-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. June 11, 2010). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 16 June 2005

in Case C-349/04: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2002/77/EC - Markets for electronic communications networks and services - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 193/12)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-349/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: E. Gippini Fournier and K. Mojzesowicz) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 13 August 2004 — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and J. Malenovský (Rapporteur), Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 June 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 239 of 25.9.2004.

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |        |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David B. Snow, Jr.              
|                       |  | Name:  |  | David B. Snow, Jr.                  
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert Klein, Secretary, Treasurer, and the
Chief Financial Officer of Precise Life Sciences Ltd., a Nevada Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d));

and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 Dated: May 20, 2003

/s/ Robert Klein
------------------
   Robert Klein

Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
STEVEN A. THOMPSON

Executive Director

October 24,2011

..-=....RECEIVED - 6PDL ~IR PLANNING SEC..

~""~'EN} OF ~NV"~N",ST" ~U,,"-:t 1OCT 27 PH 2:

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

MARY FALLIN

Governor

Mr. Guy Donaldson

Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200

Dallas, TX 75202-2733

Re: State Implementation Plan (SIP) Infrastrnctnre Requirements under Section 110(a)(I) and

(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA)

Dear Mr. Donaldson:

Per discussions with Carrie Paige and Terry Johnson of your staff, the Oklahoma Department of

Environmental Quality (DEQ) understands that EPA is working to approve Oklahoma's SIP as

meeting the requirements of Section 110(a)(I) and (2) of the CAA with regards to the 1997

ozone and 1997 and 2006 particulate matter standards. This letter serves to clarify Oklahoma's

prior letters of certification for the ozone and particulate matter standards, dated December 5,

2007, June 24, 2010, and April 5, 2011, in light of EPA's June 3, 2010 publication of the

"Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Tailoring

Rule" (75 FR 31514) and December 30, 2010 publication of "Limitation of Approval of

Prevention of Significant Deterioration Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas EmittingSources in State Implementation Plans" (75 FR 82536).

Effective July I, 2011, DEQ modified its rules for the PSD and Title V programs to implement

the GHG thresholds included in EPA's Tailoring Rule. We intend to submit the revised State

rules as a SIP revision in the near future.

Therefore, in processing the infrastructure SIP revision, DEQ requests that EPA remove from

consideration that portion of Oklahoma's SIP from which EPA, in the PSD SIP Narrowing Rule

(75 FR 82536), rescinded their previous approval of the PSD program (relating to GHG-emitting

sources below the Tailoring Rule thresholds).

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Cheryl Bradley or Leon Ashford at 405-

702-4100.

Eddie Terrill

Director, Air Quality Division

cc: Terry Johnson, Air Plarming Section, EPA Region VI (6PD-L)

Carrie Paige, Air Plarming Section, EPA Region VI (6PD-L)

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA CITY, OKlAHOMA 73101-1677

printed on recycled paper with soy ink

o
Todd AIDMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Tamela MADONIA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2499

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Tory K. EAST, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3997

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Lissette DOPICO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1860

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel. Vaccine Design PO1.                    

*Date:*                         April 16, 2009.                              ( print page 12369)    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kenneth E. Santora, PhD., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, Room 3146, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2605.                         *ks216i@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 18, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-6469 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 34 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 34

  Recognizing the roles and contributions of the men and women in the 
     public safety community who operate unmanned aircraft systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2023

 Mr. Norman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the roles and contributions of the men and women in the 
     public safety community who operate unmanned aircraft systems.

Whereas the operation of unmanned aircraft systems in the national airspace 
        system is rapidly increasing, which raises opportunities for public 
        safety and government officials;
Whereas professional operators of such systems that are operating in the public 
        safety arena must be highly trained and skilled to provide the necessary 
        level of care to support their communities;
Whereas becoming such an operator requires completing the Federal Aviation 
        Administration part 107, or acquiring a Federal Aviation Administration 
        certificate of authorization; and
Whereas the purposes of ``National Unmanned Aircraft System Operator Public 
        Safety Day'', celebrated on January 13, 2023, are--

    (1) to raise public awareness of the unquantifiable contributions of 
the operators of unmanned aircraft systems acting in the best interest of 
public safety in their communities; and

    (2) to promote greater respect and understanding for the proficiency 
and commitment of operators of unmanned aircraft systems required to assist 
law enforcement with successful support: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) thanks operators of unmanned aircraft systems working 
        in the area of public safety in the United States; and
            (2) promotes the profession by encouraging the public 
        safety community and public officials to recognize ``National 
        Unmanned Aircraft System Operator Public Safety Day''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04272]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 19 March 2015, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: February 24, 2015, in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04272 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the report on Form 10-K of Aurum, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Joseph Isaac
Gutnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:





(1)           The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  January
28, 2010




/s/
      Joseph GutnickJoseph
      Isaac GutnickChairman
      of the Board, President andChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)




30
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

March 13, 2016 

Petitioner: 

Unmanned Aerial Solutions 

2 North Street, Suite 2A 

Waldwick, NJ 07463 

201-259-2343 

RE: Amendment to Exemption Exemption No. 11445 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0143 

This is a request for an amendment to Exemption No. 11445 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-

0143, granted to Unmanned Aerial Solution. This amendment will provide for the addition of the 

following sUAS aircraft to the inventory of approved aircraft for use during operations currently 

covered under exemption 11445. 

-DJI Phantom 3 

-DJI Phantom 4 

-DJI Matrice M100 

-3d Robotics Solo 

-DJIInspire 1 

These airframes are commercially available to the general public, as are all components used to 

complete them. In addition, all configurations of these components follow standard, well 

established practices. No aspect ofthese aircraft is proprietary to Unmanned Aerial Solution in 

design or manufacture. Unmanned Aerial Solutions requests that the FAA accept the Unmanned 

Aerial Solutions Inspire sUAS and issue an amendment to Exemption 11445 allowing operation as 

set forth therein. 
Sincerely, 

lk ~~ 

President 

Unmanned Aerial Solutions
Comments on the PGP for EPA 

Mapp, Dale 

to: 

Jack Faulk 

01/25/2010 04:30 PM 

Cc: 

"Dean, Glenda", "Clark, Darby", "Smith, Katie R", "Leach, Jennifer M", "Stearns, Brad", "Warren, Lee"

Show Details 

Good afternoon Jack.

Attached please find comments on EPA's PGP from the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.

Should you have any questions about our comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks for all of you help during the conference last week in Dallas.

Dale P. Mapp, Chief

Construction Stormwater/General Permit Section

NPDES Permit Branch

Water Division

ADEM

(334) 394-4399

dpm@adem.state.al.us

Mission: Assure for all citizens of the State a safe, healthful and productive environment

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web0841.htm 5/13/2010
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sealy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending May 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David J. McIlquham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James B. Hirshorn, Senior Executive Vice President, Finance, Operations, Research and
Development of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

October 11,
2006

| |  | /s/DAVID J. MCILQUHAMDavid J. McIlquham
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                                      
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/JAMES B. HIRSHORNJames B. Hirshorn
Senior Executive Vice President, Finance,
Operations, Research & Development
(Principal Financial Officer)

---



QuickLinks
STATE EX REL. Ronald MARSHALL v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-1835

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030.

Relator has fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-30024

In the Matter of: Sharon Sylvester,

Debtor,

Sharon Sylvester, 

Appellant,

versus

Barbara Rivera-Fulton, 

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:21-CV-1083

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Sharon Sylvester went bankrupt. At the end of her Chapter 7 

proceeding, the bankruptcy court ordered her to pay certain fees to the

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 30, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 22-30024

2

trustee and a law firm that assisted the trustee. The present appeal involves 

the bankruptcy court’s award of fees to the trustee.

In affirming the award of fees to the trustee, the district court 

principally relied on its prior opinion awarding fees to the law firm. In re 

Sylvester, No. 20-CV-2469, 2021 WL 807248 (E.D. La. Mar. 2, 2021). The 

next month, however, we vacated and remanded the award of attorney’sfees, 

concluding that the bankruptcy court applied the wrong legal standard. See 

Matter of Sylvester, 23 F.4th 543 (5th Cir. 2022). Because the questions 

regarding fees in both matters are intertwined, we VACATE and 

REMAND for further proceedings consistent our recent decision.
Raymonde FONTIL, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee for GSMPS Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-RP3, Dupervil Pierre a/k/a Duperville Pierre, Rainier Realty Group, Inc., Salvatore J. Davide, as Successor Trustee, City of Miramar, Florida, and United States of America on behalf of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Appellees.

No. 4D16-4003

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 30, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*