alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0168; Form RI 20-80]


Submission for OMB Review; Request for Extension, Without Change, 
of a Currently Approved Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) a request for extension, without change, of a 
currently approved information collection. This information collection, 
``Alternative Annuity Election'' (OMB Control No. 3206-0168; Form RI 
20-80), is used for individuals who are eligible to elect whether to 
receive a reduced annuity and a lump-sum payment equal to their 
retirement contributions (alternative form of annuity) or an unreduced 
annuity and no lump sum.
    There are approximately 200 Alternative Annuity Elections per year. 
Each form takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. The annual 
estimated burden is 67 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson by telephone 
at (202) 606-4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b6852595e5805694e455844456b445b46054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbf8c2c9cec895f9ded5c8d4d5fbd4cbd695dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include a mailing address with your 
request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to:

Ronald W. Melton, Deputy Assistant Director, Retirement Services 
Program, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 
20415-3500; and

Alexander Hunt, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

    For information regarding administrative coordination contact:
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415. (202) 606-0623.

Kathie Ann Whipple,
Acting Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
 [FR Doc. E9-6922 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Carl R. LEE and Patricia Lee, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1807

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
PIERRE'S RESORT, Elias Partners, LLC, and Dr. Adil R. Elias, Appellants, v. HARI OM INC. ID I, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3038

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 7, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Josue MELENDEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WEST COAST CAR & TRUCK SALES, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5391

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Darnell MCLEOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2648

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 30, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Teresa Kay NORTHCUTT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Beta Music Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

         3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: March 31, 2011
                                       By: /s/ Edwin Mendlinger
                                           --------------------
                                           Edwin Mendlinger
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Nicholas Antowne WALKER v. STATE

CR-15-0708

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 21, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Scott M. Klein certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     May 13, 2005             Scott M. Klein    Chief Financial Officer    
19
| 1. | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,      2009 (the      Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March      31, 2010                                              |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                             |   |   |   |
| /s/ Douglas A.      Gaudet                                       |   |   |   |
| Douglas      A. GaudetPresident      and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 566 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 566

Remembering kindness in the United States and affirming our commitment 
 to fostering community and building resiliency through every day acts 
                              of kindness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2023

 Mr. Correa submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Remembering kindness in the United States and affirming our commitment 
 to fostering community and building resiliency through every day acts 
                              of kindness.

Whereas kindness means doing something for someone else with no expectation of 
        anything in return;
Whereas kindness can change a family, a neighborhood, a school, a city, a 
        nation, and ultimately, our world;
Whereas residents within the United States have a long history of demonstrating 
        kindness daily in their homes, schools, places of faith, businesses, 
        community organizations, and throughout their neighborhoods;
Whereas kindness has the power to connect people and to build community and is 
        the mortar that connects and builds the social infrastructure of the 
        United States;
Whereas the culture of kindness and compassion can heal our country from within 
        and promote a healthier society;
Whereas studies have shown that kindness can improve several aspects of health, 
        mindfulness, self-compassion, compassion toward others, and 
        interpersonal conflict; and
Whereas kindness can foster strong bonds that will bring individuals together 
        despite their differences in order to tackle the challenges that face 
        the United States in a nonpartisan manner: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United States shall recognize kind actions in our country, 
encourage kindness, spread love, and foster a culture of being kind to 
one another.
                                 <all>
```
Moses Jerome CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-408

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[No. 52351-1-I.

Division One.

June 14, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Zachary E. Tinker, *Appellant.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-8-00605-1, Patricia H. Clark, J., entered April 10 and June 4, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tinque Quarmine RHODES v. STATE

CR-15-0647

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 21, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Amendments.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes approval of amendments to 13 Class III Tribal-State Gaming Compacts (Amendments). The 13 Class III Gaming Compacts are between the State of Arizona and each of the following Indian tribes, respectively: Ak-Chin Indian Community, Colorado River Indian Tribes, Cocopah Indian Tribe, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, Havasupai Indian Tribe, Hualapai Indian Tribe, Kaibab-Paiute Indian Tribe, Navajo Nation, Tohono O'odham Nation, White Mountain Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Tribe, and Zuni Tribe.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 25, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Paula L. Hart, Acting Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240.                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The approved Amendments are substantially identical. Generally, the Amendments consist of clarifications and minor changes to various sections of each tribe's current compact (which are also substantially identical). The Amendments change the destination and frequency of the tribes' payments from quarterly to yearly, based upon the individual gaming facility's fiscal year.                

Dated: March 6, 2009.

George T. Skibine,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Economic Development.

[FR Doc. E9-6585 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 11


                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

         The table below presents information necessary for the computation of
loss per share of the common stock, on both a primary and fully diluted basis,
for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the years ended December
31, 1997, 1996 and 1995. The computations below reflect the 1 for 5 Reverse
Stock Split effective June 30, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                    JUNE 30                               YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                                    -------                               ----------------------

                                             1998              1997              1997             1996              1995
                                             ----              ----              ----             ----              ----

<S>                                      <C>               <C>             <C>                <C>             <C>          
Net loss applicable to share of
Common Stock and Common
Stock equivalents                        $ (538,690)       $ (545,692)     $ (1,708,418)      $ (733,973)     $ (1,440,003)

Average number of shares of
Common Stock Outstanding                   1,968,891         1,907,054         1,964,351        1,700,991         1,548,542
Common Stock equivalents                   1,425,404           283,293         1,425,404          283,293           190,333
Total shares of Common Stock
and Common Stock equivalents               3,394,295         2,190,347         3,389,755        1,984,284         1,738,875

Primary loss per share of
Common Stock                                 $ (.27)           $ (.29)           $ (.87)          $ (.43)           $ (.93)

Fully diluted loss per share of
Common Stock                                 $ (.16)           $ (.25)           $ (.50)          $ (.37)           $ (.83)

--------------

<FN>
         Common Stock equivalents are considered anti-dilutive because of the
net losses incurred by the Company.


</TABLE>
~ South Coast 

Air Quality Management District 

 • 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 9 1 765-4 1 78 

(909) 396-2000 - www.aqmd.gov 

June 19, 2013 

Mr. Alex Krichevsky 

Air Resources Engineer 

Stationary Source Division 

Air Resources Board 

1001 I Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Re: SIP Submittal: Rule 1114 — Re inery Coking Operations 

Dear Mr. Krichevsky: 

Attached you will find information pertaining to Rule 1114 which was adopted by the South 

Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Governing Board on May 3, 2013. 

We are requesting that upon your review and concurrence the attached Rule 1114 information be 

provided to EPA for its review and inclusion in the SIP. 

If you have any questions on this submittal, please contact Mr. Naveen Berry, Planning & Rules 

Manager, VOC Rules, at (909) 396-2363. 

Sincerely, 

~ 

Elaine Chang, DrPH 

Deputy Executive Officer 

Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources 

EC:LT:NB:DO:ET 

Attachments: 

SIP Completeness Checklist 

APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form 

Clean Copy of Rule 

Referenced Documents 

Proof of Publication 

Signed Board Resolution/Minutes 

Staff Report (Includes Public Comment & Response) 

cc Andrew Steckel/EPA Region IX (w/o attachments) 

Elaine Chang/SCAQMD (w/o attachments) 

Laki Tisopulos/SCAQMD (w/o attachments 

Rule 1114 File (w/o attachments) 

SIP File (w/attachments) 

C'ieanrng the air that we breathe...,"
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Diversified Global Holdings Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Lloyd, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard LloydRichard Lloyd, President and Chief Executive Officer


April 14, 2011
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Under
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Daleco Resources Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, I, Gary J.
Novinskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August
      5, 2010
            /s/ Gary J. NovinskieGary
      J. NovinskieChief
      Financial Officer
Sheila CLAYTON v. MARCELLO DISTRIBUTORS, LLC and Federated Mutual Insurance Company

NO. 2017-CC-2086

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Denied.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Advanced Orthopedics, PLLC, as Assignee of Isaiah L. Dawson, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>GEICO, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Office of Goldstein &amp; Flecker (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant.Law Office of Jonathan B. Seplowe, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Cheree A. Buggs, J.), entered January 27, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $8,080.63.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>At a nonjury trial of this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the sole issue was the medical necessity of the services in question. The Civil Court precluded the testimony of defendant's expert witness and granted plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict. Defendant appeals from the judgment that was subsequently entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $8,080.63.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Miguel A. Vizcaino v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-1054 K C], decided herewith), the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 23, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Deverett Lavon MACK v. STATE

CR-15-0752

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 21, 2016 Reh. denied November 10, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.