alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Kevin CHANDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. ED 106572/ED 106573

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: June 11, 2019

Alexandria A. Shah, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Eric Schmitt, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Robin Ransom, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Chandler appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his two Mo. R. Crim. P. 24.035 motions after an evidentiary hearing on both motions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).
Jamanus BECK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Matthew J. WELLS, Esq., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4549

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 27, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Code of Ethics for Executive Officers
The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Community Banking Officer, and Chief Information Officer have an obligation to the public, the Bank, and themselves to maintain the highest standards of ethical conduct.

The Code of Ethics provides fundamental principles to which the Executive Officers are expected to adhere and advocate. These principles are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Bank files with, or submits to, the Securities Exchange Commission (the SEC) and in other public communications made by the Bank;Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;The prompt internal reporting to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Ethical Code of violations of the Ethical Code; andAccountability for adherence to the Ethical Code.
This Ethical Code supplements the Banks Standards of Conduct and reflects our Corporate Values of Ethics, Respect, Teamwork, Innovation, and Excellence. The Executive Officers are expected to abide by the Ethical Code as well as the Standards of Conduct and all other applicable Vineyard Bank policies and guidelines.

Executive Officers will seek to promote fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Bank files with or submits to the SEC. The Bank seeks to provide disclosure to the investment community that is not only in conformity with applicable rules of the SEC, but that also fairly presents to investors the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank. Executive Officers shall seek to promote ethical behavior by other Bank officers and employees involved in financial reporting.

Any violation of this Ethical Code may result in disciplinary action including, but not limited to, suspension or termination of employment; pursuit of any and all remedies available for any damages or harm resulting from a violation, including injunctive relief; and referral of matters to appropriate legal or regulatory authorities for investigation and prosecution.

Any employee of the Bank who becomes aware of actual or potential infractions of this Code of Ethics or who has concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters involving the Bank or an Executive Officer should submit a report to the Audit Committee. This service is confidential and anonymous.

Waivers of this Code of Ethics may only be granted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee will not grant waivers except under extraordinary circumstances.

Annually each Executive Officer shall certify in writing his or her compliance with this Ethical Code and the Banks Standards of Conduct.

Signature

DatePrint Name

Title
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCarroll Shelby International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/Afor the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carroll Shelby,Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 16, 2004 | /s/    | CARROLL  SHELBY                                       |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | Carroll  Shelby, Chief Executive Officer and Director |

 

----
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00155-CR

DANNY RAY GRAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-0252X

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O RDER

Our review of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case indicates that they 

contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and 

the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 

9.10(a)(3). Sensitive data also includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social 

security number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification 

number.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record contains a social security number. 

Volume three of the reporter’s record contains the name of a person who was a minor at the time 

the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or 

paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive 

data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

clerk’s record and volume three of the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk 

of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed 

clerk’s record and volume three of the reporter’s record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: December 6, 2019
Angel Lynn BARROWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2636

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00452

- CR

Dimetric Dashon GONZALEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR9594

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED September 30, 2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Claudia Arellano v. Isaac Menendez

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00409

- CV

Trial court case number: 2015

- 52596

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

Appellant Claudia Arellano filed a Motion for Substitution of Counsel on December 21, 2022

. The motion does not compl y with Texas Rule of Appellate P r oc edure 6.5 (b). That is, the moti on does not state it was “ delivered to the p arty i n per son or mailed

– b o th by certified and by first

- class mail

– to the party a t the party ’ s last known address. ” In addition, the motion does not contain the certificate of conference required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5)

. Acc ord in gly, the motion is denied w i thout prejudice to refil ing

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5 ( b )

, 10.1(a)(5)

. It is so ORDERED.

J udge’s signature: /s/ Ver onica Rivas

- Molloy

Acting individually

Date: J anuary 5 , 2023
[No. 29854-6-II.

Division Two.

May 18, 2004.]

#### Thomas Taylor, *as Personal Representative, Appellant,*v. Thurston County, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 01-2-01916-1, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered January 14, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ.
Amendment No. 5 to the Employee Savings Plan, amended as of July 29, 2005



 Exhibit 10.9.5 
 AMENDMENT NO. 5 
 TO THE 
 UNIFIED WESTERN GROCERS, INC. 
 EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN 
 Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby amends the above-named plan (the “Plan”), effective as of March 28, 2005,
as follows: 
 1. Article VI of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 6.13 to read as follows: 
 “Section 6.13: Automatic Rollover. In the event of a mandatory distribution greater than $1,000 in accordance with the
provisions of Article VI, if the Participant does not elect to have such distribution paid directly to an Eligible Retirement Plan specified by the Participant in a direct rollover or to receive the distribution directly in accordance with Article
VI, then the Committee shall pay the distribution in a direct rollover to an individual retirement plan designated by the Committee.” 
 * * * * * 
 The Company has caused this Amendment No. 5 to be signed on the date indicated below, to be effective as indicated
above. 
  

									
		 		 	“Company”
			
		 		 	UNIFIED WESTERN GROCERS, INC.
				
	Dated: July 29, 2005	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Don Gilpin
		 		 		 		 	Don Gilpin
		 		 		 	Its: 	 	Vice President, Human Resources
Cite as: 579 U. S. ____ (2016) 1 

BREYER, J., dissenting 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

JOHN WAYNE CONNER v. ERIC SELLERS, WARDEN 

ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
 

APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
 

No. 16–5230 (16A59) Decided July 14, 2016 

The application for stay of execution of sentence of death 

presented to JUSTICE THOMAS and by him referred to the 

Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is 

denied. 

JUSTICE BREYER, dissenting from denial of certiorari

and application for stay of execution. 

I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and

application for stay of execution for the reasons stated in 

Conner v. Sellers, ante, p. ___ (Breyer, J., dissenting from

denial of certiorari and application for stay of execution).
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report") that:



|Date: May 10, 2005 |  | /s/JAMES R. MULVIHILLJames R. Mulvihill Chief Financial
Officer
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Omar D. CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1459

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 659 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 659

Recognizing the 25th Army Corps of the Union Army and thanking them for 
   their role in capturing Galveston, Texas, on June 5th, 1865, and 
                liberating thousands of enslaved people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 22, 2023

   Mr. Green of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the 25th Army Corps of the Union Army and thanking them for 
   their role in capturing Galveston, Texas, on June 5th, 1865, and 
                liberating thousands of enslaved people.

Whereas the 25th Army Corps was the largest unit of African Americans in the 
        Union Army during the Civil War, comprised of more than 1,000 soldiers;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps captured Galveston, Texas, on June 5, 1865, a week 
        before General Gordon Granger's arrival on June 19, 1865;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps chased the rebel government and soldiers of Texas 
        into Mexico and spread the word about freedom, liberating thousands of 
        enslaved people in Texas;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps were the first unit to occupy the former capital of 
        the Confederacy, Richmond, Virginia, on April 3, 1864;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps, who were previously held in the bondage of slavery, 
        not only emancipated enslaved persons in Galveston, they also released 
        Union soldiers and enslaved persons taken captive by the Confederate 
        Army;
Whereas the soldiers of the 25th Army Corps, through their actions and 
        sacrifices, brought a crucial victory for the Union and played an 
        indispensable role in the struggle for human rights, contributing to the 
        abolition of slavery;
Whereas the 25th Army Corps not only waged war against the Confederacy but also 
        waged a significant battle against racial prejudice and discrimination 
        across the Nation; and
Whereas the legacy of the 25th Army Corps continues to inspire subsequent 
        generations, instilling the values of courage, freedom, and justice and 
        reminding us of our shared humanity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and thanks 
the 25th Army Corps of the Union Army for their role in capturing 
Galveston, Texas, on June 5, 1865, and liberating thousands of enslaved 
people days prior to the arrival of General Gordon Granger on June 19, 
1865.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132155 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132155 

 COA: 270965 

Oakland CC: 2003-192851-FC 

PAUL GEORGE PAQUETTE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



           I, Joseph A. Orlando, as President and Principal Executive Officer of
Leucadia National Corporation - Arizona (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31,
2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  May 3, 2004

                                   By:/s/ Joseph A Orlando
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Joseph A. Orlando
                                      President and Principal Executive Officer
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT NATALIE MYERS AND JULIANA ROBERSON VERSUS MARY CAUTHEN, LINDA PETIT, MONIQUE BATISTE, CHERYL BOSSENMEYERAND THE AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY DEPARTMENT OF LOUISIANA DEC NO. 2023 CW 0592


### SEPTEMBER 7, 2023
In Re: Mary Cauthen, Linda Petit, Monique Batiste, Cheryl

Bossenmeyer, and The American Legion Auxiliary Department of Louisiana DEC, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 685530. BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT JEW GH EW
Jeremy James MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3187

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Section 302 CFO CertificationEX-31.2 6 dex312.htm SECTION 302 CFO CERTIFICATION
 Exhibit 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Ronald R. Shenkin, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Pilot Financial, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
 statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
 the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
 were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
 report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
 information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
 respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
 registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
 establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
 Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
 controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
 material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
 subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
 during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and
 
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
 procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
 effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
 period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation.
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
 most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the
 registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
 directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
 operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
 summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
 employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
 financial reporting.
 
 June 30, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Ronald R. Shenkin
 Ronald R. Shenkin
 President
 Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 529 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 27
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 529

                          [Report No. 118-117]

 Relating to the resolution (H. Res. 503) impeaching Joseph R. Biden, 
 Jr., President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2023

     Mr. Roy, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the resolution (H. Res. 503) impeaching Joseph R. Biden, 
 Jr., President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

    Resolved, That House Resolution 503 is hereby re-referred to the 
Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the 
Judiciary.
                                                  House Calendar No. 27

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 529

                          [Report No. 118-117]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Relating to the resolution (H. Res. 503) impeaching Joseph R. Biden, 
 Jr., President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 21, 2023

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```