alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-8786-6]


Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB) Meeting Dates, and 
Agenda

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Teleconference Meetings

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Laboratory 
Advisory Board (ELAB), as previously announced, will have 
teleconference meetings on April 15, 2009 at 1 p.m. ET; May 20, 2009 at 
1 p.m. ET; June 17, 2009 at 1 p.m. ET; and July 15, 2009 at 1 p.m. ET 
to discuss the ideas and views presented at the previous ELAB meetings, 
as well as new business. Items to be discussed by ELAB over these 
coming meetings include: (1) Expanding the number of laboratories 
seeking National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference 
(NELAC) accreditation; (2) proficiency testing; (3) ELAB support to the 
Agency's Forum on Environmental Measurements (FEM); (4) implementing 
the performance approach; and (5) follow-up on some of ELAB's past 
recommendations and issues. In addition to these teleconferences, ELAB 
will be hosting their next face-to-face meeting on August 10, 2009 at 
the Hyatt Regency San Antonio in San Antonio, TX at 9 a.m. (CT).
    Written comments on laboratory accreditation issues and/or 
environmental monitoring issues are encouraged and should be sent to 
Ms. Lara P. Autry, DFO, U.S. EPA (E243-05),109 T. W. Alexander Drive, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, faxed to (919) 541-4261, or e-mailed 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#27465253555e094b4655466742574609404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05647071777c2b69647764456075642b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>. Members of the public are invited to listen to 
the teleconference calls, and time permitting, will be allowed to 
comment on issues discussed during this and previous ELAB meetings. 
Those persons interested in attending should call Lara P. Autry at 
(919) 541-5544 to obtain teleconference information. For information on 
access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact 
Lara P. Autry at the number above. To request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact Lara P. Autry, preferably at least 10 days 
prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process 
your request.

    Dated: March 13, 2009.
Kevin Teichman,
EPA Acting Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. E9-6612 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Custom er Service Hotline: 1**  **- 800**  **- 438**  **- 2474**  **UNITED STA**

**TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A**  **GENCY**

**REGION III 1650 A**  **rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103**  **- 2029**  May 20, 2013 Honorable Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environ mental Control 89 Kings Highway Dover, Delaware 19901 Dear Secretary

O’Mara : On April 1 , 2013 , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Delaware State I mplementation Plan (SI P) from the Delaware Department of Natural Reso ur ces and Environmental Control. The SI P revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act section 110 infrastructure elemen ts for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards

. EPA ha s determined that the submittal is administratively and technically

complete, and is being reviewed to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR)

. If members of y our staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Rose Quinto, Office of Air Program P lanning at (215) 814

- 2182, or at quinto.rose@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely , /s/ Diana Esher , Director Air Protection Division

cc: Mr. Ali Mirzakhalili, DNREC Mr. Ron ald D. Amirikian, DNREC
EX PARTE Leonard E. DORSEY

CR-15-1424

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 26, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Ct. of Civ. App.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen J. Fanning, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Solta Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Solta Medical, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen J. Fanning
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                  |  | Stephen J. Fanning                   
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

I,
John F. Glenn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Solta Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Solta Medical, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 3, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John F. Glenn
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             |  | John F. Glenn          
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:            |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6536]



[[Page 12904]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,455]


Graphic Visual Solutions, Inc., Greensboro, NC; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 3, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Graphic 
Visual Solutions, Inc., Greensboro, North Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6536 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 674 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 674

 Expressing support for the designation of September 22 as ``National 
             Military and Veterans Suicide Awareness Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2023

Mr. Self submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for the designation of September 22 as ``National 
             Military and Veterans Suicide Awareness Day''.

Whereas the members of the United States Armed Forces and veterans have 
        selflessly served and sacrificed to defend the Nation's freedom and 
        security;
Whereas the mental health and well-being of military personnel and veterans are 
        vital components of their overall readiness and ability to lead 
        fulfilling lives;
Whereas the persistent challenges of post-traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, 
        and other mental health issues contribute to an alarming rate of suicide 
        within the military and veteran populations;
Whereas it is our duty to raise awareness about the struggles faced by military 
        members and veterans, combat the stigma surrounding mental health, and 
        foster an environment that encourages seeking help;
Whereas designating a specific day for national awareness can bring attention to 
        the importance of providing adequate mental health support and resources 
        to military personnel and veterans;
Whereas September is recognized as Suicide Prevention Awareness Month, providing 
        an opportune time to focus on the unique challenges faced by those who 
        have served the Nation; and
Whereas we recognize September 22 as National Military and Veterans Suicide 
        Awareness Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of a ``National Military and Veterans Suicide Awareness 
Day''.
                                 <all>
```
1

The Honorable Brian Stacy Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3461

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Samuel William Cocke, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 11, 2009

Filed: May 18, 2009

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BYE, Circuit Judge, and MILLER, District Judge.1

___________

PER CURIAM.

Samuel William Cocke appeals the eighteen-month sentence he received for

violating a condition of his supervised release. Despite the fact his sentence is three

months below the low end of the range recommended under U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (21-27 months based on the Grade B violation Cocke
2

The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

-2-

admitted to and his Criminal History Category of VI), Cocke argues the district court2

imposed an unreasonable sentence. 

We review the sentence imposed for an abuse of discretion. United States v.

Charles, 531 F.3d 637, 640 (8th Cir. 2008). The record indicates the district court was

aware of, and considered, the relevant sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

for determining an appropriate sentence for a violation of supervised release. The

record also indicates the district court considered Cocke's arguments for imposing a

lower sentence. We see nothing in the record to indicate the district court abused its

discretion in imposing a sentence that was already below the recommended

Guidelines, and therefore affirm.

______________________________
[No. 51680-9-I.

Division One.

May 24, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Marden L. Wolsey, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Whatcom County, No. 01-1-01175-1, Michael F. Moynihan, J., entered January 7, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Ellington, A.C.J., and Coleman, J.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James E. Hogue, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Wiltex A, Inc., (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1. the accompanying Form 10QSB report for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. By: /s/ JAMES E. HOGUEJames E. HogueChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 Date: August 16, 2004
2

sr: :"4:04-Sit

canine "sniff." The district court denied Roberts' claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress the evidence on this ground because it concluded that the drug dog's sniff did not constitute a search. We agree. Roberts' luggage was sniffed in a public place, which does not "constitute a 'search' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment" because the intrusion is minimal and does not violate a reasonable expectation of privacy. See United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696, 707 (1983); United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir. 1984); cf Florida v. Jardines, U.S. , 133 S. Ct. 1409, 1417 (2013) (distinguishing dogs' sniffs in public places from those within the curtilage of one's home). Because the Fourth Amendment was not implicated, see Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463, 468-69 (1985), police officers required no suspicion before allowing the dog to sniff his luggage. We conclude that the district court did not err by denying Roberts' claim, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Douglas Saitta
cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge Sally S. deSoto Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7454

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH NATHANIEL BROWN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CR-89-7, CA-96-456)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Nathaniel Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley

Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Nathaniel Brown, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown,

Nos. CR-89-7; CA-96-456 (E.D. Va. July 21, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Telecommunications and Information Administration


Renewal of the Digital Economy Board of Advisors Charter

AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration 
(NTIA), U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of the renewal of the Digital Economy Board of Advisors 
Charter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 20, 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce renewed 
the Charter for the Digital Economy Board of Advisors. It has been 
determined that the Committee is necessary and in the public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evelyn Remaley, Designated Federal 
Officer, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 
1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20230; Telephone (202) 482-
3821; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afcaddcac2cec3cad6efc1dbc6ce81cbc0cc81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e5b4c5b535f525b477e504a575f105a515d10595148">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Digital Economy Board of Advisors was 
established on December 22, 2015, as a federal advisory committee to 
provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Commerce, 
through the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and 
Information, on a broad range of issues concerning the digital economy 
and internet policy.

    Dated: December 27, 2017.
Kathy D. Smith,
Chief Counsel, National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-28294 Filed 12-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-16-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          27
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   19,528
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                19,555
<PP&E>                          1,175,009
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,509,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           10,323,924
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     50,000
<COMMON>                        1,533,293
<OTHER-SE>                      (3,581,018)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,509,200
<SALES>                         746,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                746,193
<CGS>                           592,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,426,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                (2,086,110)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              283,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (2,877,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,877,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,877,916)
<EPS-BASIC>                   0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.02




</TABLE>
p130346.eng INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0346 Focus Ready Draft 4/4/2013 ENGINEER: Hall \ EV PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: BASF Corporation USE: Emulsion stabilizer and solubilizing agent for fragrance used in fabric care and cleaning products (12. 5%), and emollient in cosmetics (87.5%, FDA use). The production volumes are for both types of uses. STN CA 158:196339, 158:44177 and numerous others describe the substance as a cosmetic/fragrance stabilizer. OTHER USES: STN CA 153:242385: dryer sheets containing emollient ingredient; STN CA 149:408958: pyrrolidone carboxylic acid for impregnating wet wipes; STN CA 156:131913: marine-bioactive agent for sunscreens.

Consumer Use: Yes SAT (concerns) (03/29/2013): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Page 1p130346.eng Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P1B3T1 . Health: 1-2 Not Required Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0346 PROC: Number of Sites/ Location: 1 unknown site(s) Days/yr: 250 Basis:

Page 2p130346.eng (per submission) ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Water Conservative: 8.0E-1 kg/site-day over 10 days/yr from 1 site

Landfill High End: 1.2E+0 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site or 3.0E+2 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL 3.1E+2 kg/yr - all sites

Page 3
exv10w4



 





Exhibit 10.4



November 16, 2007



PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL



Dr. Gayle R. Dolecek, Ph.D., Sr. VP, R&D

4520 East West Highway, 3rd Floor

Bethesda, Maryland 20814



     Re:     Amendment to Employment Agreement



Dear Dr. Dolecek:



     This letter will reflect the agreement between you and Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) upon certain amendments to the terms of the Employment Agreement between you and the
Company dated June 16, 2006.



     Effective as of the first payroll period in June 2007, your Base Salary has been increased to
the annual rate of $170,500. In addition, effective immediately, your Compensation Upon Severance
in the event the Company terminates (or elects not to renew) your Employment Agreement “without
cause,” or upon disability pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Agreement, or in the event you terminate
the Agreement for “good reason” has been altered to increase your lump-sum severance to a payment
equal to six (6) months of your then-current base salary. Your Compensation Upon Severance has also
been altered to extend the period for which you are entitled to receive reimbursement for the cost
of continued health insurance coverage to a maximum of six (6) months after termination.



     Consistent with the requirements for modification set forth in Section 6.3 of the Employment
Agreement, this letter will document the mutual agreement between you and the Company to amend (1)
Section 3.1(a) of your Employment Agreement to reflect the foregoing increase in Base Salary, (2)
Section 4.4(a)(iii) of that agreement to reflect the foregoing increase in your Compensation Upon
Severance, and (3) Section 4.1(a) of that agreement to alter the definition of “Benefit Period” to
mean “six (6) month period” rather than “two (2) month period.”



     The foregoing are the only changes to the terms of the Employment Agreement to be made at this
time. Please indicate your agreement to these modifications of the Employment Agreement by
countersigning the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning the same
to me for the Company’s files.



     Thank you for your cooperation.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ RYUJI UENO
 	 
	 	Ryuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D 	 
	 	President 	 
	 



Acknowledged and accepted this 6th day of December, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ GAYLE R. DOLECEK
 	 	 
	Gayle R. Dolecek
#### Chester Kennison, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. T. S. Neal Realty Company, Inc., a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 27, 1928;

Petition for Rehearing Denied May 30, 1928.

*Edward 8. Bridges,*for Plaintiff in Error;

No appearance for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs ^and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, con*850sidered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.