Report on Reductions Achieved from Incentive-Based

Emission Reduction Measures in the San Joaquin Valley 

APPENDIX E: Prop 1B Goods Movement – 2010 Program

Guidelines for Implementation

Release Date: September 22, 2014

Hearing Date: October 23, 2014

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Air Resources Board
PROPOSITION 1B: 

GOODS MOVEMENT EMISSION REDUCTION PROGRAM

FINAL 2010 

GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION 
[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

i March 2010 

DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies of this document and related materials can be found at: 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/gmbond. Alternatively, paper copies may be obtained from the 

Air Resources Board’s (ARB) Public Information Office, 1001 I Street, 1st Floor, Visitors 

and Environmental Services Center, Sacramento, California, 95814, (916) 322-2990. 

If you need this document in an alternative format (i.e., Braille, large print) or another 

language, please contact Melissa Niederreiter at (916) 323-6576 or 

mniederr@arb.ca.gov. TTY/TDD/Speech to Speech users may dial 711 for the 

California Relay Service. 

CONTACTS

Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program 

Planning and Technical Support Division 

Air Resources Board 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 

Program Information Line: (916) 44-GOODS (444-6637) 

Program Email: gmbond@arb.ca.gov

Program Website: http://www.arb.ca.gov/gmbond

ONGOING CLARIFICATION OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

ARB staff clarifications regarding specific issues that may arise after publication of the 

final Guidelines will be made available on the Program website to assist agencies with 

implementation. 

DISCLAIMER

This report has been reviewed by ARB staff and approved for publication. Approval 

does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of ARB the, 

nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or 

recommendation for use. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

ii March 2010 

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

iii March 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

I. Overview ................................................................................................................. 1

A. Introduction........................................................................................................... 1

B. Authority ............................................................................................................... 2

1. Proposition 1B................................................................................................. 3

2. Senate Bill 88 and Assembly Bill 201.............................................................. 3

3. New legislation.............................................................................................. 11 

4. Governor Schwarzenegger’s directives......................................................... 11

C. Definitions........................................................................................................... 12 

II. ARB Program Administration ............................................................................. 19

A. Program Guidelines............................................................................................ 19

1. ARB staff clarification of Program requirements............................................ 20

2. Provisions that do not apply to projects receiving FY2007-08 funds............. 20

B. Program Funding Targets and Priorities............................................................. 21

1. Trade corridor funding targets....................................................................... 21

2. Category funding targets............................................................................... 22

3. Priorities for FY2007-08 funds....................................................................... 22

4. Priorities for FY2008-09 and FY2009-10 funds............................................. 23

C. Project Specifications and Emissions................................................................. 23

1. Project specifications for each funding cycle................................................. 23

2. Quantifying project benefits........................................................................... 25

a) Pollutants..................................................................................................... 25

b) Project benefits calculators.......................................................................... 26

D. Provision for Truck Loan or Loan Guarantee Programs ..................................... 26

E. ARB Process to Award Funds to Local and State Agencies............................... 28

1. Notice of funding availability.......................................................................... 28

2. Qualification of applicants ............................................................................. 28

3. Review of local and State agency applications ............................................. 29

a) Completeness ............................................................................................. 29

b) Consistency with legal and equipment project specifications ...................... 29

c) Consistency with air quality plans for goods movement .............................. 30

d) Availability of full funding ............................................................................. 30

e) Project schedule and milestones................................................................. 30

f) Data to determine air quality benefits and cost-effectiveness...................... 30

g) Project implementation demonstration ........................................................ 30

4. ARB evaluation of local or State agency capability to implement the 

 project scope................................................................................................. 30

5. Match funding................................................................................................ 31

6. Competitive ranking of local or State agency projects................................... 31

a) Emission reduction score ............................................................................ 32

b) Cost-effectiveness and match score ........................................................... 32

c) Competitive ranking..................................................................................... 34

7. Public workshops on eligible local and State agency projects....................... 34
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

iv March 2010

8. Recommendations for funding local and State agency projects.................... 34

a) Consideration of available funds and funding priorities ............................... 34

b) Funding level for project proposals.............................................................. 35

9. Public hearing and Board action ................................................................... 35

10. Local agency grant agreement...................................................................... 35

a) Standard grant agreement provisions ......................................................... 36

b) General Program provisions........................................................................ 36

c) Funding category-specific elements ............................................................ 37

11. State agency loan and loan guarantee program interagency agreement...... 38

a) Standard interagency agreement provisions ............................................... 39

b) Scope of work provisions............................................................................. 40

F. ARB Program Oversight ..................................................................................... 40

1. ARB obligations to local or State agencies.................................................... 40

2. ARB expenditures ......................................................................................... 41

a) Administration funds.................................................................................... 41

b) Equipment project costs .............................................................................. 43

3. Funding recapture - ARB............................................................................... 44

4. Ongoing evaluations ..................................................................................... 45

a) Ongoing evaluations of local agency projects ............................................. 45

b) Ongoing evaluations of equipment projects................................................. 46

5. Auditing ......................................................................................................... 47

a) ARB audits of local agency projects ............................................................ 48

b) ARB audits of equipment projects ............................................................... 50

6. ARB reporting................................................................................................ 50

a) Public website ............................................................................................. 51

b) Annual community meetings ....................................................................... 51

c) Updates to the Department of Finance........................................................ 51

d) ARB annual report....................................................................................... 51

7. Local agency non-performance..................................................................... 52

a) Non-performance finding............................................................................. 52

b) Local agency appeal process...................................................................... 52

c) Remedies for non-performance................................................................... 53

8. State agency non-performance..................................................................... 55 

III. Local Agency Project Proposal .......................................................................... 56

A. Local Agency Registration.................................................................................. 56

1. Existing or returning local agencies............................................................... 56

2. New local agency registration ....................................................................... 56

3. New State agency registration ...................................................................... 57

B. Legal and Program Restrictions ......................................................................... 57

1. Legal restrictions........................................................................................... 57

a) Environmental mitigation ............................................................................. 58

b) Railroad agreements ................................................................................... 58

c) Existing ARB regulations............................................................................. 58

d) Upcoming ARB regulations ......................................................................... 59

2. Program restrictions ...................................................................................... 60
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

v March 2010

C. Project Alternatives for Local Agencies .............................................................. 61

1. Technology alternatives ................................................................................ 61

2. Project implementation approaches and use of contractors.......................... 62

3. Procedure/process alternatives..................................................................... 63

4. Geographic operations.................................................................................. 63

D. Local Agency Pre-Application Community Meeting............................................ 64

E. Local Agency Project Application ....................................................................... 65

1. General information....................................................................................... 65

2. Project proposal ............................................................................................ 66

3. Provisions to customize proposal.................................................................. 66

4. Funding demonstration ................................................................................. 67

a) Program funds requested............................................................................ 67

b) Match funding requirements ........................................................................ 67

5. Air quality benefits......................................................................................... 68

6. Staff resources.............................................................................................. 68

7. Project schedule............................................................................................ 69

8. Certification to comply with Program requirements....................................... 69

9. Local agency board/commission resolutions................................................. 70 

IV. Local Agency Project Implementation ............................................................... 72

A. Project Implementation Requirements................................................................ 72

1. Community and public participation .............................................................. 72

a) Public participation ...................................................................................... 72

b) Public website ............................................................................................. 72

2. Equipment project marketing tools................................................................ 72

a) Marketing tools ............................................................................................ 73

b) Outreach to independent truck owner/operators ......................................... 73

c) Information on truck efficiency upgrades..................................................... 73

d) Outreach to small businesses for infrastructure construction ...................... 74

3. Local agency solicitation of equipment projects ............................................ 74

4. Requirements for equipment projects where the local agency is also the 

equipment owner........................................................................................... 76

5. Evaluation and Database entry of equipment project applications................ 76

a) Review of equipment project applications ................................................... 76

b) Database entry of equipment project applications....................................... 77

6. Match funding for equipment projects ........................................................... 77

a) Carl Moyer program .................................................................................... 77

b) Motor vehicle registration fees (AB 2766).................................................... 77

c) Match funding from greenhouse gas reduction incentives, including 

 AB 118......................................................................................................... 77

7. Competitive ranking and selection of equipment projects ............................. 78

a) Emission reduction score ............................................................................ 78

b) Cost-effectiveness score ............................................................................. 79

c) Competitive ranking..................................................................................... 79

d) Ranked list approval process ...................................................................... 80

e) Selection of projects for funding .................................................................. 80
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

vi March 2010

8. Compliance check......................................................................................... 81

9. Notifications to equipment owners ................................................................ 82

10. Equipment project pre-inspections................................................................ 82

11. Equipment project contracts.......................................................................... 83

a) Standard contract provisions....................................................................... 84

b) General Program provisions........................................................................ 84

c) Source category-specific elements.............................................................. 85

12. Tax reporting................................................................................................. 86

13. Provisions for lease-to-own programs........................................................... 86

a) General requirements.................................................................................. 87 

b) Legal structure provisions............................................................................ 87

c) Lease agreement provisions ....................................................................... 88

14. Equipment project scrap requirements.......................................................... 88

15. Reuse of trucks/limited alternative to scrappage for trucks ........................... 90

16. Equipment project post-inspections .............................................................. 90

17. Local agency requests to ARB for grant funds.............................................. 91

18. Local agency non-performance provisions.................................................... 91

B. Obligations, Expenditures, and Earned Interest ................................................. 91

1. Local agency obligation of funds to equipment owners................................. 91

2. Local agency expenditures on equipment projects ....................................... 92

a) Expenditure deadlines for equipment projects............................................. 92

b) Equipment project purchase restrictions...................................................... 92

c) Invoice payments (reimbursements) ........................................................... 92

d) Direct payment to vendor ............................................................................ 94

3. Earned interest.............................................................................................. 94

a) Calculation of earned interest...................................................................... 94

b) Reporting requirement for earned interest................................................... 95

c) Earned interest expenditure provisions ....................................................... 95

C. Funding Recapture - Local Agency .................................................................... 95

1. Process for recapturing funds ....................................................................... 95

2. Expending recaptured funds ......................................................................... 86

D. Ongoing Local Agency Evaluation of Equipment Projects.................................. 96

E. Local Agency Reporting Requirements .............................................................. 96

1. Quarterly data updates.................................................................................. 97

2. Semi-annual report........................................................................................ 97

3. Local agency project completion report......................................................... 98 

V. State Agency Project Implementation................................................................ 99

A. Implementation Requirements............................................................................ 99

B. Transfer, Obligation, and Expenditure of Funds ................................................. 99

C. Ongoing Evaluation of Loan and Loan Guarantee Programs ........................... 100

D. State Agency Reporting Requirements ............................................................ 100

1. Semi-annual report...................................................................................... 100

2. Project completion report ............................................................................ 100 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

vii March 2010

VI. General Equipment Project Requirements ...................................................... 102

A. Ownership Requirements ................................................................................. 102

B. Third Party Applications.................................................................................... 102

C. Equipment Project Specifications ..................................................................... 102

D. Equipment Project Application Requirements .................................................. 103

1. Equipment project information..................................................................... 103

2. Equipment project schedule........................................................................ 103

3. Case-by-case equipment projects............................................................... 103

4. Certifications and disclosures...................................................................... 103

5. Equipment project funding demonstration................................................... 104

E. Equipment Project Operation............................................................................ 105

F. Equipment Accidentally Rendered Inoperable or Stolen .................................. 105

G. Equipment Transfer/Sales Requirements......................................................... 106

H. Optional Equipment Project Contract Buy-out .................................................. 107 

I. Equipment Project Non-performance ............................................................... 107 

APPENDICES 

Project Specifications for FY2008-09 and Later Funds by Source Category

APPENDIX A Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks..................................................... A-1 

A. Equipment Project Specifications........................................................... A-1 

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion.................................................. A-9 

C. Application Information......................................................................... A-9 

1. General information...................................................................... A-10

2. Current equipment and activity information........................................ A-10 

3. Proposed equipment project information............................................ A-12

D. Scrap Requirements.......................................................................... A-14 

E. Post-Inspection................................................................................. A-17 

F. Recordkeeping Requirements.............................................................. A-19 

G. Annual Reporting Requirements........................................................... A-19 

APPENDIX B Locomotives and Rail Yards.................................................. B-1 

A. Equipment Project Specifications........................................................... B-1 

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion.................................................. B-6 

C. Application Information.........................................................................B-6 

1. General information........................................................................ B-6 

2. Current equipment and activity information.......................................... B-6 

3. Proposed equipment project information.............................................. B-8 

D. Scrap Requirements.......................................................................... B-10 

E. Alternative to Scrapping...................................................................... B-10 

F. Post-Inspection................................................................................. B-11 

G. Recordkeeping Requirements.............................................................. B-11 

H. Annual Reporting Requirements........................................................... B-12 

1. Annual reporting for switcher and line-haul locomotives........................ B-12 

2. Annual reporting for locomotive emissions capture and control system.... B-12 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

viii March 2010

APPENDIX C Ships at Berth.......................................................................... C-1 

A. Equipment Project Specifications........................................................... C-1 

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion................................................. C-5 

C. Application Information........................................................................ C-5 

1. General information........................................................................ C-5 

2. Current equipment and activity information.......................................... C-5 

3. Proposed equipment project information............................................. C-5 

D. Post-Inspection.................................................................................. C-8 

E. Recordkeeping Requirements............................................................... C-8 

F. Reporting Requirements...................................................................... C-8 

1. Annual reporting for shore power (grid- and non-grid-based power)........... C-8 

2. Annual reporting for ship emissions capture and control system............... C-9 

APPENDIX D Commercial Harbor Craft........................................................ D-1 

A. Equipment Project Specifications........................................................... D-1 

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion.................................................. D-3 

C. Application Information........................................................................ D-3 

1. General information........................................................................ D-4 

2. Current equipment and activity information.......................................... D-4 

3. Proposed equipment project information............................................. D-5 

D. Scrap Requirements............................................................................ D-6 

E. Post-Inspection.................................................................................. D-8 

F. Recordkeeping Requirements............................................................... D-8 

G. Reporting Requirements...................................................................... D-9 

APPENDIX E Cargo Handling Equipment.................................................... E-1 

A. Equipment Project Specifications........................................................... E-1 

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion................................................. E-3 

C. Application Information......................................................................... E-3 

1. General information........................................................................ E-3 

2. Current equipment and activity information.......................................... E-3 

3. Proposed equipment project information............................................. E-4 

D. Scrappage........................................................................................ E-5 

E. Post-Inspection.................................................................................. E-7 

F. Recordkeeping Requirements............................................................... E-7 

G. Reporting Requirements...................................................................... E-7 

APPENDIX F Equipment Project Specifications for FY2007-08 Funds 

A. Trucks Serving Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards........................................ F-1 

B. Other Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks............................................................. F-4 

C. Locomotives..................................................................................... F-10 

D. Shore Power.................................................................................... F-12 

E. Commercial Harbor Craft..................................................................... F-14 

F. Cargo Handling Equipment.................................................................. F-16 

G. Truck Stop/Distribution Center Electrification........................................... F-17 

APPENDIX G Trade Corridor Maps............................................................... G-1 

APPENDIX H Early Grants from FY2007-08 Funds........................................ H-1
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 1 March 2010

I. Overview 

A. Introduction

Emissions from the diesel engines in trucks, locomotives, ships, harbor craft, and cargo 

handling equipment contribute to local, regional, and global air pollution. The diesel 

pollution from goods movement operations greatly impacts the health of community 

residents near ports, rail yards, distribution centers, and roads with high truck traffic. 

Diesel emissions are also a major cause of the high regional ozone and fine particle 

levels that harm millions of Californians today. 

Goods movement sources contribute to California’s air pollution challenges. The Los 

Angeles/Inland Empire region has the largest concentration of goods movement 

facilities (e.g., ports and rail yards), with high near-source health risks and high levels of 

regional ozone and fine particulate (PM2.5) pollution. In the Central Valley, the facilities 

are less concentrated, but there is relatively more through truck and rail traffic that 

contribute to the region’s harmful ozone and PM2.5 levels. In the Bay Area, regional 

ozone and PM2.5 levels are much lower, but truck, port, and rail yard activity adjacent 

to neighborhoods contributes to high localized health risks. In the San Diego/Border 

region, trucks and operations at the port contribute to regional ozone and PM2.5 

pollution above the State of California (State) standards. 

Proposition 1B authorized the Legislature to appropriate $1 billion in bond funding to the 

Air Resources Board (ARB or Board) to quickly reduce air pollution emissions and 

health risks from freight movement along California’s priority trade corridors. The State 

Fiscal Year (FY) 2007-08 budget included implementing legislation, via Senate Bill 88 

(SB 88) (Chapter 181, Statutes of 2007), that created the Goods Movement Emission 

Reduction Program (Program). Assembly Bill 201 (AB 201) (Chapter 187, Statutes 

of 2007) included a minor clarification. These bills are codified in the Health and 

Safety Code, section 39625 et seq. SB 88 required ARB to adopt Guidelines to ensure 

the Program achieves the statutory objectives. 

The implementing statutes directed ARB to maximize the emission reduction benefits 

and achieve the earliest possible health risk reduction in communities heavily impacted 

by goods movement. This Program supplements regulatory actions and other 

incentives to cut diesel emissions. By statute, the Program can only fund emission 

reductions “not otherwise required by law or regulation.” Key pollutants targeted by the 

Program include diesel particulate matter (diesel PM), an air toxic, and nitrogen oxides 

(NOx) that contribute to the formation of both PM2.5 and ozone. The projects funded 

under the Program also provide co-benefits by reducing greenhouse gases and black 

carbon emissions that contribute to climate change.

The FY2007-08, FY2008-09, and FY2009-10 State budgets each appropriated 

installments of $250 million for the Program. While the State budget appropriates 

funding for the Program, ARB must receive cash from the sale of bonds or a loan from 

the Pooled Money Investment Board to implement grants or loan programs. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 2 March 2010

ARB awards grants to fund projects proposed by local agencies that are involved in 

freight movement or air quality improvements associated with goods movement 

activities. Examples of local agencies include air pollution control and air quality 

management districts (air districts), ports, and regional transportation agencies in the 

trade corridors. The local agencies are responsible for providing financial incentives to 

owners of equipment used in freight movement to upgrade to cleaner technologies, 

consistent with the Guidelines adopted by ARB. Bond funds flow via grant agreements 

from ARB to local agencies, then to equipment owners via contracts or other binding 

agreements with those local agencies. At both steps, there is competition based on the 

projected emission reductions and reductions per State dollar invested to ensure the 

most beneficial projects are funded. ARB may also award funds to any State agency 

(including ARB itself) for the purpose of administering a loan or loan guarantee program 

via an interagency agreement.

ARB staff developed these Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction 

Program Guidelines for Implementation (Guidelines) in consultation with stakeholders, 

including: air districts, metropolitan planning organizations, port authorities, shipping 

lines, railroad companies, trucking companies, harbor craft owners, freight distributors, 

terminal operators, local port community advisory groups, community interest groups, 

and airports. These Guidelines are designed to fund qualifying projects that reduce 

emissions and health risks, incorporate simplicity and efficiency, ensure costeffectiveness, leverage other funding sources, and provide transparency and 

accountability. 

When the Board adopted the initial Guidelines on February 28, 2008, the Board directed 

ARB to reassess those Guidelines and bring appropriate updates to the Board following 

each appropriation of funding. This is the first update. This proposed update 

incorporates interim changes made via Board Resolution, Executive Orders, and staff 

clarifications for projects receiving FY2007-08 funds. It also revises the project 

specifications for FY2008-09 and later year funds. The updated 2010 Guidelines will 

supersede the February 28, 2008 Guidelines, except for the limited provisions identified 

for FY2007-08 funds (see Chapter II.A.2.). 

B. Authority

The legal authority for the Program is found in the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, 

Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, also known as Proposition 1B, pursuant 

to the implementing statutes discussed below. Governor Schwarzenegger provided 

additional direction to ARB in his Executive Order S-02-07 on bond accountability and 

his signing statement on the 2007-08 budget bill – Senate Bill 77 (Chapter 171, 

Statutes of 2007) (SB 77). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 3 March 2010

1. Proposition 1B 

In November 2006, California voters approved Proposition 1B, which among other 

things, authorized $1 billion dollars to reduce emissions from goods movement in 

California’s trade corridors. 

“One billion dollars ($1,000,000,000) shall be made available, upon appropriation 

by the Legislature and subject to such conditions and criteria contained in a 

statute enacted by the Legislature, to the State Air Resources Board for emission 

reductions, not otherwise required by law or regulation, from activities related to 

the movement of freight along California's trade corridors. Funds made available 

by this paragraph are intended to supplement existing funds used to finance 

strategies and public benefit projects that reduce emissions and improve air 

quality in trade corridors commencing at the state's airports, seaports, and land 

ports of entry.” (Government Code, Title 2, Division 1, Section 1, Chapter 12.49, 

Article 2, Section 8879.23(c)(2)). 

2. Senate Bill 88 and Assembly Bill 201 

In August 2007, the California Legislature passed and Governor Schwarzenegger 

signed SB 88 and AB 201, which set forth the implementing legislation for the Program 

in Health and Safety (H&S) Code, section (§) 39625 et seq. SB 88 broadly requires 

ARB to adopt Guidelines, establish funding criteria and procedures, and provide 

periodic reports. 

Under SB 88, ARB must adopt Guidelines that include, at a minimum, all of the 

following: 

• An application process for the funds, and any limits on administrative costs. 

• Requirements that local agencies identify the useful life of the project and project 

delivery milestones as part of the application process. 

• Criteria for selection of local agency projects and equipment projects. 

• Requirements for match funding. 

• The method by which ARB will consider an air basin’s status in achieving State and 

federal air quality standards. 

• Requirements that grant agreements between ARB and local agencies identify 

project milestones and remedies for failure to meet project milestones. 

• Accountability and auditing requirements, including provisions for audits of project 

expenditures and outcomes. 

SB 88 and AB 201 detail more than 15 factors that ARB is directed to consider when 

allocating funds and selecting local agency projects. Some of these criteria are most 

effectively applied by targeting levels of funding to trade corridors and emission source 

categories, while others lend themselves to selecting among competing local agency 

projects or equipment projects. The steps ARB takes to allocate funds include: 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 4 March 2010

• Identifying funding targets for the overall Program, plus setting funding priorities and 

defining the equipment project options for each appropriation. 

• Competitively ranking and selecting local agency projects for funding in each 

appropriation cycle. 

• Establishing the procedures that local agencies will use to competitively rank and 

select equipment projects for funding. 

Tables I.1 - I.3 detail these steps and link each related provision of these Guidelines to 

the statutory requirements in the Health and Safety Code related to funding projects. 

SB 88 also establishes basic reporting requirements for ARB and local agencies (all 

references are to the Health and Safety Code): 

• ARB shall submit an annual report to the Legislature summarizing its activities 

related to the administration of this Program on January 10 [§39627.5]. 

• The local agency shall complete semi-annual reports on progress made toward 

implementation of the project [§39625.02(f)(1)]. 

• The local agency shall submit a final report on project completion within 6 months of 

the project becoming operable [§39625.02(f)(2)].
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementa

Chapter I. Overview 5 

Table I.1 ARB Funding Priorities/Project Options and Statutory Funding Requirements 

ARB Action Guidelines reference Provisions Statutory Requirements [references to Health and Safety Code]

Population relative to other trade corridors Percent of emissions from goods movement relative to other trade corridors 

The combination of population and goods movement emissions: conrisk associated with goods movement-related emissions and air toxic

the public health benefits of the emission reduction from funded proje

allocates funds in a manner that gives priority to funding for emission achieve the earliest possible reduction of health risk in communities risks from goods movement facilities [§39625.5(b)(1)]; and reflects wh

funded projects are likely to occur in locations with elevated emission[§39625.5(b)(2)(K)].

1. Recommend 

trade corridor funding targets (corridors in §39625.1(e))

Chapter II.B.1.

State Implementation Plan (SIP) needs relative to other trade corridors 

Considers an air basin’s status in maintaining and achieving State anquality standards [§39626(a)(1)(D)], and SIP requirements [§39625.5(b

level of funding should be administered by local agencies in each tra

Emissions from each category 

Considers the severity and magnitude of the source category’s contrmovement emissions [§39625.5(b)(2)(D)], including greenhouse gas e

[§39625.5(b)(2)(F)]. 

Health impact of category 

Allocates funds in a manner that gives priority to emission reduction earliest possible reduction of health risk in communities with the highgoods movement facilities [§39625.5(b)(1)]. 

2. Recommend 

category funding targets (categories in §39625.1(c))

Chapter II.B.2.

Funding category Requires competition for funding between local agency projects in fo

represent a single source category or combination of categories (i.e.combined with electrification of truck stops/etc. and shore power is cequipment). Expends funds in a manner that reduces the health risk movement along California’s trade corridors [§39625(d)], maximizes t

benefits [§39625(e)], and provides incentives to control emission sour

increased health risk in the future [§39625(e)]. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementa

Chapter I. Overview 6 

Table I.1 ARB Funding Priorities/Project Options and Statutory Funding Requirements (cont.) 

ARB Action 

Guidelines reference Provisions Statutory Requirements [references to Health and Safety Code]

3. Recommend 

funding priorities for each appropriation 

Chapters II.B.3. and II.B.4. 

Projects that can be quickly implemented FY2007-08: Truck retrofits with diesel PM filters and Los Angeles/Inland Empire port truck replacements FY2008-09 and FY2009-10: Truck, locomotive, and ships at berth projects 

Allocates funds in a manner that gives priority to projects that achievreduction of health risk in communities with the highest health risks ffacilities [§39625.5(b)(1)]. Retrofitting trucks with diesel PM filters is th

health risk because those retrofits can be accomplished quickly. ComPorts of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and along the drayage truck ryards or distribution centers, have elevated emissions and exposure operations [§39625.5(b)(2)(K)]. 

Truck upgrade projects quickly reduce the health risk in communities freeways, warehouse/distribution centers, ports, and rail yards [§3962

projects cut the elevated, excess cancer risks in neighborhoods near in ARB’s health risk assessments [§39625.5(b)(1)]. Ships at berth pro

diesel pollution in port communities, and cut greenhouse gas emissio

Equipment and/or emission level 

Begins with list of projects eligible for funding [§39625.5(a)(2)]. List of 

considers: the ability to reduce criteria and toxic emissions [§39625.5

of the emission reduction [§39625.5(b)(2)(A)], public health benefits of 

[§39625.5(b)(2)(B)], existing (and pending) regulatory requirements [§3

advanced emission reduction technologies [§39625.5(b)(2)(G)] where 

available, and reduction in greenhouse gas emissions [§39625.5(b)(2)

specifications for equipment upgrades. For locomotives, establishes Class I railroads that have signed agreements with public agencies tthat the emission reductions from any locomotive projects for these rnecessary to satisfy any mandated reduction requirement under any 

[§39625.5(a)(2)(B)]. Specifically prohibits funding for idle reduction de

2005 Memorandum of Understanding. 

4. List eligible 

equipment project options and project specifications for each appropriation (project types identified in §39625.5(a)(2))

Chapter II.C.1. and Appendices A-F.

Funding caps/match funding 

Requires a specified contribution of funds leveraged from other sourccontributions to the project [§39626(a)(1)(B)], considers the cost-effec

[§39625.5(b)(2)(C)] and helps leverage other funds [§39625.5(b)(2)(H)] v

funds that can be requested for each equipment project option. Statamount to roughly 1/3 to 1/2 of total project cost, with the remainder public matching funds. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementa

Chapter I. Overview 7 

Table I.1 ARB Funding Priorities/Project Options and Statutory Funding Requirements (cont.) 

ARB Action 

Guidelines reference Provisions Statutory Requirements [references to Health and Safety Code]

Project life Considers sustainability of the emission reductions via minimum proj

years of operation or activity levels for upgraded equipment [§39625.5

element of reductions over project lifetime per State dollar invested [

Project completion prior to regulatory requirement(s) or emission reductions beyond regulatory requirements 

Considers the degree of surplus reductions [§39625.5(b)(2)(E)] and en

achieve reductions not otherwise required by law or regulation [§3962

requirements that equipment upgrades be operational a specified timany regulatory requirement for such upgrade, or that upgrades achiegreater than required by regulation. 

4. (cont.) 

Conditions on future operations 

Considers whether reductions are likely to occur in areas with elevatexposure [§39625.5(b)(2)(K)] via requirements for at least 90 percent C

home port, plus visitation frequency for trucks serving ports and inter

Table I.2 Selection Process for Local Agency Projects and Statutory Funding Requirements 

ARB Action Guidelines reference Based On Statutory Requirements [references to Health and Safety Code]1. Issue notice of 

funding availability 

Chapter II.E.1. 

Registration, application submittal and schedule, and requirement for community meeting 

Starts local agency application process [§39626(b)]. Requires local a

concepts for local agency projects, and solicit and consider communfor Program funding – this helps ensure that local agency project proearliest possible reduction of health risk in communities with the highmovement [§39625.5(b)(1)].

2. Review local 

agency eligibility 

Chapters II.E.2. and II.E.3. 

Basic qualification Meets statutory definition of an applicant as a local public entity invol

or air quality improvements associated with goods movement [§3962

requirements of these Guidelines. 

Completeness Ensures presence of complete application and signed board/commis

evaluate statutory requirements described below. 

3. Review local 

agency project eligibility 

Chapter II.E.3. 

Consistent with legal and project specifications 

Ensures local agency project achieves emission reductions not otherregulation [§39625.5(a)(1)] and complies with all eligible equipment pr

equipment project specifications that encompass multiple statutory re
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementa

Chapter I. Overview 8 

Table I.2 Selection Process for Local Agency Projects and Statutory Funding Requirements (

ARB Action Guidelines reference Based On Statutory Requirements [references to Health and Safety Code]

Sponsored by an applicant and consistent with air quality plans 

Local agency project is sponsored by an applicant as evidenced by p

[§39626.5(a)(1)] and project is consistent with any comprehensive loca

strategies to reduce emissions from goods movement [§39626.5(a)(2)

Availability of full funding 

Requires project funding element to demonstrate that the funds are ereasonably available and sufficient to complete the project [§39625.02

Project schedule/milestones 

Requires project applications to have project delivery milestones [§39

3. (cont.) 

Data for competitive ranking process 

Requires project applications to reflect the useful life of the project sp[§39625.02(e)(2)], as well as provide data on the emission reductions, 

Program and match funds (other State, local, federal, and private) to ranking in Action 7 below. 

4. Post eligible 

projects on website 

Chapter II.E.3.

Public access Makes available preliminary list of projects being considered for fund

comment [§39626(c)(1)]. 

5. Evaluate local 

agency capability to implement project scope 

Chapter II.E.4. 

Resources to implement project scope within allowed time 

Considers local agency’s ability to implement equipment projects and achieve the earliest possible health risk reduction [§39625(e)] and [§3

6. Require match 

funding 

Chapter II.E.5. and Appendices A-F. 

Identify sources of match funding 

Ensures that State bond funds are supplemented and matched with fand private sources to the maximum extent feasible [§39625.5(c) and 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementa

Chapter I. Overview 9 

Table I.2 Selection Process for Local Agency Projects and Statutory Funding Requirements (

ARB Action Guidelines reference Based On Statutory Requirements [references to Health and Safety Code]

Emission reductions score 

Requires local agency projects to compete within a funding category emission reductions [§39625.5(a)(1)] and magnitude of the emission r

[§39625.5(b)(2)(A)]. Considers public health benefits of the reductions PM (i.e., diesel PM) by a factor of 20 relative to criteria pollutant NOx health impact of each ton of PM emissions [§39625.5(b)(2)(B)], sustain

via project life [§39625.5(b)(2)(C)], and ability to reduce criteria and tox

considering NOx and diesel PM [§39625.5(b)(2)(I)]. 

Cost-effectiveness score 

Considers cost-effectiveness of the emission reductions [§39625.5(b)

leverage funds from other sources [§39625.5(b)(2)(H)] by assessing to

reductions over project lifetime per State dollar invested [§39625.5(b)

7. Competitively 

rank local or State agency projects 

Chapter II.E.6. 

Competitive ranking Equally weights the above scores. 

8. Hold workshops Chapter II.E.7. 

Public input Requires ARB staff to hold public workshops in northern, central, and 

discuss the preliminary list of local agency projects being considered 

Local agency competitive ranking 

Allocates funds on a competitive basis for projects that achieve the greductions from each source category [§39625.5(a)(1)]. 

9. Recommend 

project funding 

Chapter II.E.8. Available funds and 

funding priorities 

Limits selection or “programming” of local agency projects to funds aLegislature [§39626(d)]. 

10. Hold hearing to 

adopt project list 

Chapter II.E.9. 

Public hearing and Board adoption of funding awards to local or State agency projects 

Requires consideration of projects at a regularly scheduled public he

Requires adoption of a final list of projects for funding [§39626(c)(3)]. 

11. Execute local 

agency or interagency agreements 

Chapters II.E.10. and II.E.11. 

ARB and local or State agency to sign 

Implements grant funding via legal agreements between ARB and reagencies [§39625.3]. Ensures statutory and Guideline requirements 

projects are met. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementa

Chapter I. Overview 10 

Table I.3 Selection Process for Equipment Projects and Statutory Funding Requirements 

Local Agency Action Guidelines reference Based On Statutory Requirements [references to Health and Safety Co1. Solicit equipment 

project applications 

Chapters IV.A.2., IV.A.3., and IV.A.4. 

Marketing/outreach and application elements including data for competitive ranking process 

Requires project applications to reflect the useful life of the pro

well as provide data on the equipment activity to estimate emiand Program and match funds (other State, local, federal, and competitive ranking in Action 3 below. Also requires local ageefficiency upgrades to reduce greenhouse gases [§39625.5(b)(

infrastructure projects, requires local agencies to encourage thbusinesses in the construction of the State’s infrastructure [Go

14838.1]. 

2. Require match 

funding 

Chapter IV.A.6. and Appendices A-F.

Identify sources of match funding 

Ensures that State bond funds are supplemented and matchefederal, local, and private sources to the maximum extent feas

§39625.5(b)(2)(H)]. 

Emission reductions score 

Requires equipment projects to compete within a source categbased on greatest emission reductions [§39625.5(a)(1)] and ma

reductions [§39625.5(b)(2)(A)]. Also considers: public health b

by weighting combustion PM (i.e., diesel PM) by a factor of 20 pollutant NOx to reflect the greater health impact of each ton o[§39625.5(b)(2)(B)], sustainability of the reductions via project li

and ability to reduce criteria and toxic pollutants by considerin[§39625.5(b)(2)(I)]. 

Cost-effectiveness score Considers cost-effectiveness of the emission reductions [§396

to leverage funds from other sources [§39625.5(b)(2)(H)] by ass

emission reductions over project lifetime per State dollar inves

3. Competitively rank 

equipment projects (each vehicle or piece of equipment competes separately) 

Chapter IV.A.7. 

Competitive ranking Equally weighting the above scores. 

4. Post ranked 

projects 

Chapters IV.A.1. and IV.A.7. 

Public access Provides public access to competitively ranked projects propo

signature of contracts with equipment owners [consistent with 

ARB to do the same in §39626(c)(1)]. 

5. Execute equipment 

project contracts 

Chapter IV.A.11. 

Local agency and equipment owner (and any lessee) to sign 

Ensures statutory and Guideline requirements for equipment p
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 11 March 2010

3. New legislation 

Assembly Bill 892 (Furutani, Statutes of 2009) authorizes local agencies to award 

unspent or returned funds from previously obligated contracts to new equipment 

projects. Local agencies may either award these funds to new equipment projects 

selected from the same competitively ranked list as was used in the original award or 

return the funds to ARB for reallocation as described in the Guidelines. Local agencies 

must disburse any unspent or returned funds on a new contract within 4 years of the 

date of the award of the original contract or the funds revert to the California Ports 

Infrastructure, Security, and Air Quality Improvement Account Highway Safety, Traffic 

Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Fund of 2006. 

Assembly Bill 672 (Bass, Statutes of 2009) allows local agencies implementing 

approved Proposition 1B projects to apply to the administering State agency for a “letter 

of no prejudice” to authorize future reimbursement for funds to be advanced by the local 

agency at its own risk. Although the legislation is primarily directed at transportation 

projects funded by Proposition 1B, it also applies to air quality projects. Projects 

covered by a letter of no prejudice would not gain an advantage or higher priority for 

funding. The ARB Executive Officer or his or her designee has the authority to specify 

the submittal process and ARB staff approval procedures for letters of no prejudice. 

4. Governor Schwarzenegger’s directives 

In January 2007, Governor Schwarzenegger issued Executive Order S-02-07 

highlighting the importance of transparency and accountability in administering the over 

$40 billion in bond funding approved by California voters in 2006. The Executive Order 

directs all State government entities responsible for expending bond proceeds to 

establish and document a three-part accountability structure that includes: 

• Front-end accountability, which defines the criteria for expending bond funds as well 

as the outcomes that the funds are intended to achieve. 

• In-progress accountability, which documents actions to ensure projects are staying 

within scope and cost, and requires semi-annual reports to the Department of 

Finance (DOF). 

• Follow-up accountability, which requires audits to ensure expenditures achieved the 

intended outcomes and were consistent with legal requirements. 

ARB submitted and DOF approved the three-part structure for this Program (based on 

the initial Guidelines) in February 2008. The approved structure is available on the 

Program website. 

The Governor’s signing message on the FY2007-08 budget via SB 77 also: 

• Called on ARB to move quickly—without sacrificing accountability—to provide relief 

for the individuals who reside along California’s busy trade corridors. 

• Directed ARB to ensure funding is allocated consistent with the accountability 

safeguards in the Executive Order. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 12 March 2010

• Charged ARB to develop Guidelines that make sense, reduce bureaucratic red tape, 

simplify and expedite project application and award procedures, and ensure projects 

are completed in record time. 

• Called on local agencies to work closely with ARB to be prepared to submit 

applications for funding as soon as possible. 

C. Definitions

The following definitions apply for the purposes of these Guidelines. 

Table I.4 Definitions 

Term Definition 

Administrative 

Agency 

“Administrative agency” (henceforth ARB or Board) is defined by SB 88 to be the 

Air Resources Board as the State agency responsible for programming Program 

funds. 

Administration 

Funds 

“Administration funds” are defined as the monies up to the limits defined in these 

Guidelines to cover expenses incurred for implementation of the Program by 

ARB or a local agency that is party to an executed grant agreement. 

Allocation “Allocation” is defined as the Board action to award grant funds to local agencies 

as documented in a Board resolution. 

Applicant “Applicant” is defined by SB 88 to mean a “local public entity involved in the 

movement of freight through trade corridors of the state or involved in air quality 

improvements associated with goods movement. For the purpose of 

administering a loan or loan guarantee program only, an applicant may be any 

State agency, including ARB.” These Guidelines clarify how ARB will assess a 

local public entity’s eligibility as a Program applicant. 

Appropriation “Appropriation” means an authorization by the Legislature in the annual Budget 

Act to make funds available from the California Ports Infrastructure, Security, 

and Air Quality Improvement Account Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air 

Quality and Port Security Fund of 2006 to ARB for the purpose of implementing 

this Program.

ARB or Board “ARB” or “Board” means the California Air Resources Board. The term “Board” 

is specifically used to refer to the governing board of the agency and is typically 

associated with formal actions to adopt Guidelines or projects for funding. 

Authorized 

Local Agency 

Representative 

“Authorized local agency representative” means the individual(s) from the local 

agency authorized to sign or act on behalf of the local agency. 

Contract “Contract” means the legally binding agreement between a local agency and 

equipment owner. (Also referred to as an Equipment Project Contract) 

Contract Term “Contract Term” means the combined time period for: 

1) Equipment project completion; and 

2) The equipment project life. 

(Also referred to as an Equipment Project Contract Term) 

CostEffectiveness “Cost-Effectiveness” means the total pollutant-weighted emission reductions 

over the project life, per dollar of State funding invested, except for State funds 

specifically excluded from this calculation by the Guidelines. 

Days “Days” means calendar days, unless otherwise noted. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 13 March 2010

Table I.4 Definitions (cont.) 

Term Definition 

Diesel 

Particulate 

Matter 

(diesel PM) 

“Diesel Particulate Matter (Diesel PM)" means the particles found in the exhaust 

of diesel engines, which may agglomerate and adsorb other species to form 

structures of complex physical and chemical properties. Diesel PM is a subset 

of fine particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter (PM2.5). 

Earned Interest “Earned interest” means accrued interest from Program funds being held by the 

local agency in interest-bearing accounts. 

Elapsed 

Equipment 

Project Life 

“Elapsed equipment project life” means the time elapsed since post-inspection of 

the completed project by the local agency. 

Equipment 

Owner 

“Equipment owner” means the current legal owner of Program-eligible equipment 

and program funded equipment, except that for grid-based shore power, the 

term “equipment owner” shall encompass any party with the authority to co-fund, 

implement, and operate improvements resulting in provision of grid-based shore 

power, which may include, but not be limited to the port, a marine terminal 

operator, and shipping companies. 

Equipment 

Project 

“Equipment project” means an upgrade of existing diesel equipment via retrofit, 

repower, replacement, installation of electrical infrastructure or an emissions 

capture and control system, according to Program requirements. Each individual 

truck, locomotive, rail yard, piece of cargo equipment, harbor craft, ship berth, 

truck stop or distribution center proposed for upgrade is considered a separate 

equipment project. 

Equipment 

Project 

Alternative 

“Equipment project alternative” means one or more choices that the local agency 

may propose to customize the local agency project proposal in its application. 

Equipment 

Project 

Completion 

“Equipment project completion” means the date the local agency determines that 

all equipment project requirements are completed with the exception of ongoing 

maintenance, operation, and annual reporting requirements for the new or 

upgraded equipment. For each equipment project, this includes the liquidation of 

Program funds and successful post-inspection (including scrappage, if required). 

Equipment 

Project Cost 

“Equipment project cost” means the total cost of the equipment project, including 

State and non-State funding, but excluding administration funds. 

Equipment 

Project Life 

“Equipment project life” for each project option in these Guidelines means the 

length of time an equipment owner is obligated (under an equipment project 

contract) to maintain and operate the bond-funded equipment according to the 

requirements of the Program.

Equipment 

Project Option

“Equipment project option” means the specific mechanism to retrofit, repower, or 

replace a diesel engine, or provide an alternative power source to reduce 

emissions of diesel PM and/or NOx. A source category may include multiple 

equipment project options (e.g., truck retrofit, repower, and replacement are 

each distinct project options as defined in these Guidelines). 

Expenditure “Expenditure” means payment of Program funds. “ARB expenditure” means 

ARB’s payment of Program funds to a local agency, another State agency, or a 

contractor; or use of those funds for internal administration. “Local agency 

expenditure” means a local agency’s payment of Program funds to an equipment 

owner or a contractor; or use of those funds for internal administration. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 14 March 2010

Table I.4 Definitions (cont.) 

Term Definition 

Fleet size “Fleet size” means the number of diesel-fuel vehicles traveling in California that 

are registered to be driven on public highways and have a manufacturer’s gross 

vehicle weight rating of 14,001 pounds or greater that are under common 

ownership or control [as defined in CCR section 2025 in title 13, article 4.5, 

chapter 1] by a person, business, or government agency.

Freshly 

Manufactured 

Locomotive 

Engine 

“Freshly Manufactured Locomotive Engine” means, pursuant to Code of Federal 

Regulations Title 40, Part 92.2, a new locomotive engine which has not been 

remanufactured. 

Funding 

Category 

“Funding category” means the source category or combination of source 

categories for purposes of establishing funding targets and competition between 

equipment projects. For example, the shore power and cargo equipment source 

categories are combined into a single funding category with a recommended 

funding target. 

Goods “Goods” are defined as having the same meaning in Commercial Code section 

2105, which essentially requires that: 

1) The goods must be movable. 

2) The goods being moved must be part of a transaction that involves a 

contract for the sale of the goods. 

Guidelines “Guidelines” means the Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction 

Program – Guidelines for Implementation and accompanying Final Staff Report 

adopted February 28, 2008, and any subsequent amendments to those 

Guidelines adopted by the Board or enacted via ARB Executive Order. 

Grant “Grant” (also referred to as “grant funds” and “grant award”) means the Program 

funding allocated by ARB to a local agency under a grant agreement (or 

alternate mechanism for State agencies). 

Grant 

Agreement 

“Grant agreement” means the legally binding agreement between ARB and a 

local agency. 

Grant 

Agreement 

Term 

“Grant Agreement Term” means the time period identified in a local agency 

project grant agreement within which a local agency is legally bound to fully 

implement the local agency project. 

Grant 

Expenditure 

Request 

“Grant Expenditure Request” means the form used by the local agency to 

request Program funds from ARB. 

Independent 

Owner Operator 

“Independent Owner Operator” means a person who both owns a single heavyduty diesel truck and personally operates that truck to haul goods. 

Interagency 

Agreement 

“Interagency Agreement” means the legally binding agreement between ARB 

and a State agency. 

Liquidation “Liquidation” means the full expenditure of all Program funds in an executed 

grant agreement or equipment project contract. “ARB liquidation” means the full 

expenditure of all Program funds identified in an executed grant agreement. 

“Local agency liquidation” means the full expenditure of all Program funds 

identified in an executed equipment project contract. 

Loan or Loan 

Guarantee 

Program - 

State agency 

“Loan or Loan Guarantee Program” means a program established by a State 

agency to assist equipment owners to obtain financing to retrofit or replace 

heavy-duty trucks. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 15 March 2010

Table I.4 Definitions (cont.) 

Term Definition 

Local Agency “Local agency” means an eligible applicant or recipient of Program funds from 

ARB. For the purpose of administering a loan or loan guarantee program, a 

State agency may be considered a local agency. A local agency that is 

administering Program funds under an executed grant agreement is also 

referred to as a recipient agency in SB 88. 

Local Agency 

Board/ 

Commission 

“Local agency board/commission” means the popularly elected or appointed 

governing body of a local public entity. 

Local Agency 

Project 

“Local agency project” means the funding category-specific incentive program 

that the local agency proposes to implement with Program funding. 

Local Agency 

Project 

Implementation 

Approach 

“Local agency project implementation approach” means the mechanism(s) a 

local agency may propose to implement one or more equipment project options. 

For example, as part of a single local agency project, a port may propose to 

employ three contractors to run truck replacement programs – one focused on a 

lease-to-own program for diesel trucks, one on leasing natural gas trucks, and 

one on offering grants to truck owners for purchase of new trucks. Each of these 

mechanisms are implementation approaches. 

Local Public 

Entity 

A “local public entity” means a county, city, district, public authority created by 

statute, public agency, and any other political subdivision in the State. Local 

public entities do not include states or the federal government. 

Locomotive 

Remanufacture 

“Locomotive remanufacture” means one or more of the following, pursuant to 

Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 92.2(1):

(i) To replace, or inspect and qualify, each and every power assembly of a 

locomotive or locomotive engine, whether during a single maintenance event or 

cumulatively within a five-year period; 

(ii) To upgrade a locomotive or locomotive engine;

(iii) To convert a locomotive or locomotive engine to enable it to operate using a 

fuel other than it was originally manufactured to use; 

(iv) To install a remanufactured engine or a freshly manufactured engine into a 

previously used locomotive. 

Locomotive 

Repower 

“Locomotive repower” means, pursuant to Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, 

Part 92.2, replacement of the engine in a previously used locomotive with a 

freshly manufactured locomotive engine. 

Match Funding “Match funding” means the non-Program funds used in conjunction with Program 

funds to fully fund proposed local agency and equipment projects. These may 

include monies from private, local, other State, and federal sources, except as 

otherwise provided under these Guidelines or local, State, and federal law. 

Middle-Aged 

Truck 

For the purposes of a three-way truck transaction, a “middle aged truck” means 

a truck with a MY1998-2006 engine. 

Model Year 

(MY) 2007 

Emissions 

“MY2007 emissions” for trucks are defined as emissions of 1.20 grams per brake 

horsepower-hour (g/bhp-hr) or less of NOx (FEL and CERT values), and 0.01 

g/bhp-hr or less of PM (CERT value), as certified by the most recent ARB 

Executive Order for on-road use with an intended service of Heavy-Heavy Duty 

Diesel for diesel engines or Heavy Duty Otto for applicable alternative fuel 

vehicles. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 16 March 2010

Table I.4 Definitions (cont.) 

Term Definition 

Model Year 

(MY) 2010 

Emissions 

“MY2010 emissions” for trucks are defined as CERT and FEL emissions of 

0.20 g/bhp-hr or less of NOx (FEL and CERT values), and 0.01 g/bhp-hr or less 

of PM (CERT value), certified by the most recent ARB Executive Order for onroad use with an intended service of Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel for diesel engines 

or Heavy Duty Otto for applicable alternative fuel vehicles. 

Nonperformance “Non-performance” means the act of not completing one or more components of 

an executed local agency project grant agreement or equipment project contract. 

Not Otherwise 

Required by 

Law or 

Regulation 

"Not otherwise required by law or regulation" means the emission reductions are 

not required pursuant to any local, State, or federal law, rule, or regulation; any 

requirements imposed by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); or 

any requirements imposed by a legal instrument such as a legal settlement or 

consent decree (collectively referred to as "law or regulation"). 

For purposes of this Program only, "not otherwise required by law or regulation" 

does not apply to any tariff, ordinance, or other requirement imposed by a local 

agency based on that local agency's authority as a market participant or 

municipal proprietor or the local agency's authority to enter into contracts with 

equipment owners and operators. 

Notice of 

Funding 

Availability 

“Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)” is defined by statute as ARB’s public 

announcement to begin solicitation of local agency project applications. 

Obligation “ARB obligation” means the initial award of Program funds by the Board to 

specific local or State agency projects, followed by execution of a grant 

agreement between ARB and a local agency or an interagency agreement 

between ARB and another State agency. “Local agency obligation” means the 

execution of an equipment project contract between a local agency and 

equipment owner. “State agency obligation” means the commitment of specific 

Program funds for truck loan and guarantee programs. 

Board adoption of a resolution awarding funds via specific, named grant or 

interagency agreements to local or State agencies shall satisfy State 

requirements to encumber funds within one year of the date of appropriation. 

(Obligation is also commonly referred to as “encumbrance”). 

Old Truck “Old truck” means a truck with a MY1993 or older engine for the purpose of the 

three-way truck transaction. 

Program “Program” means the Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program, except 

as otherwise noted. 

Program Funds “Program funds” means the combination of both project and administrative 

funds. 

Project Benefits 

Calculator 

“Project Benefits Calculator” or “Calculator” means an analytical method and 

inputs provided by ARB to estimate the emission reductions and costeffectiveness of proposed projects. 

Project Funds “Project funds” means the funds used directly to upgrade equipment – it does 

not include funds used by ARB, local agencies, or other State agencies for 

administration of the Program. 

Recaptured 

Funds 

“Recaptured funds” means Program funds newly eligible for distribution or 

redistribution prior to any statutory reversion requirements. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 17 March 2010

Table I.4 Definitions (cont.) 

Term Definition 

Recipient 

Agency 

“Recipient agency” means the local agency or State agency that receives 

Program funds under an executed grant agreement, interagency agreement, or 

other mechanism (for ARB). 

Replacement “Replacement” means the act of replacing higher-emitting diesel vehicle(s), a 

piece of diesel equipment, or diesel harbor craft with a lower-emitting vehicle, 

piece of equipment, or craft (e.g., replacement of one or two old trucks with a 

new one). 

Repower “Repower” means the act of replacing a higher-emitting diesel engine with a new 

or remanufactured, lower-emitting engine in the same vehicle, piece of 

equipment, or harbor craft. 

Retrofit “Retrofit” means the act of adding emission control technology or modifying an 

engine on an existing diesel vehicle, piece of diesel equipment, or diesel harbor 

craft. The project specifications may require that this technology be an ARB 

Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategy. 

State 

Implementation 

Plan 

“State Implementation Plan” or SIP means the air quality plan adopted by ARB 

and local air districts (as applicable) that demonstrates how each region will 

attain or maintain national ambient air quality standards, as required by the 

federal Clean Air Act section 110. 

Source 

Category 

“Source Category” means a discrete category of emission sources specific to 

this Program. A source category may contain multiple equipment project 

options. Under this Program, source categories include: heavy duty diesel 

trucks, locomotives, ships at berth, cargo handling equipment, and commercial 

harbor craft. To establish funding targets and promote appropriate competition 

between projects, ARB may combine multiple source categories within a 

“funding category.” 

Three-way 

Truck 

Transaction 

“Three-way truck transaction” means the act of replacing a middle-aged truck 

with a new truck; installing a retrofit on the middle-aged truck and using it to 

replace an old truck; and scrapping the old truck. 

Trade Corridor “Trade corridor” means any one of the four following regions in California: 

Bay Area, consisting of: 

San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (CCR Title 17 §60101) 

Central Valley, consisting of: 

 San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (CCR Title 17 §60107)

 Sacramento Metropolitan Federal Ozone Nonattainment Area 

 (40 CFR Part 81 §81.305, p.23886-23887, Apr 30, 2004) 

Los Angeles/Inland Empire, consisting of: 

 South Coast Air Basin (CCR Title 17 §60104) 

 Port Hueneme in Ventura County 

San Diego/Border Region, consisting of: 

 San Diego County (Government Code §23137) 

 Imperial County (Government Code §23113)
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter I. Overview 18 March 2010

Table I.4 Definitions (cont.) 

Term Definition 

Verified Diesel 

Emission 

Control 

Strategy 

“Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategy (VDECS)” means an emission control 

strategy, designed primarily for the reduction of diesel PM emissions, which has 

been verified pursuant to the “Verification Procedure for In-Use Strategies to 

Control Emissions from Diesel Engines” in title 13, California Code of 

Regulations, commencing with section 2700. 

(Note: ARB has separate procedures to verify control devices for stationary 

sources.) 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 19 March 2010 

 Administration

II. ARB Program Administration 

This chapter identifies the proposed requirements for ARB to administer the Program. 

State law requires that the Board hold public hearings, adopt Guidelines, and adopt a 

final list of local and State agency projects that will receive funding from each 

appropriation. ARB staff shall implement the Board’s direction as defined in Board 

resolutions, the Guidelines, and the list of local agency projects to be funded. 

ARB staff’s duties to administer the Program shall include, but are not limited to: 

developing and updating Guidelines and project specifications; issuing the Notice of 

Funding Availability (NOFA); soliciting, reviewing, and recommending local and State 

agency projects for funding; executing and implementing grant agreements with local 

agencies and interagency agreements with other State agencies; auditing local and 

State agency projects; tracking and reporting on progress in expending funds and 

achieving performance milestones; developing and maintaining a public website on the 

Program; and conducting workshops and other forms of outreach to seek public input 

on Program design and implementation. 

A. Program Guidelines 

As required by State law, ARB developed and adopted the initial Guidelines and 2008 

Staff Report in a public process at the February 28, 2008 Board meeting. The 

Guidelines shall include, at a minimum, all of the following: 

• An application process for the funds, and any limits on administrative costs. 

• Requirements that local agencies identify the useful life of the project and project 

delivery milestones as part of the application process. 

• Criteria for selection of local and State agency projects and equipment projects. 

• Requirements for match funding. 

• The method by which ARB will consider the air basin’s status in achieving State and 

federal air quality standards. 

• Requirements that grant agreements between ARB and local agencies, and 

interagency agreements with other State agencies, identify project milestones, and 

remedies for failure to meet project milestones. 

• Accountability and auditing requirements, including provisions for audit of project 

expenditures and outcomes. 

Following each appropriation of Program funds to ARB, staff shall develop, and the 

Board will consider adoption of, any appropriate updates to these Guidelines prior to 

issuing the NOFA for that funding cycle. ARB staff shall evaluate the progress of the 

Program and any changes needed to improve its effectiveness, plus advances in 

technology and updated equipment costs that create a need to revise the list of 

equipment project options. ARB staff shall provide adequate opportunity for public 

input, including release of any proposed updates to these Guidelines for public review 

prior to Board consideration at a noticed public hearing.
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 20 March 2010 

 Administration

These Guidelines are designed and intended to effectuate the provisions of SB 88, 

AB 201, and AB 892. However, in the event a provision of these Guidelines conflicts 

with these bills, or any other statute enacted to implement Proposition 1B, the relevant 

statutory provisions shall control. 

1. ARB staff clarification of Program requirements 

During Program implementation, specific issues may arise that require ARB staff to 

interpret or clarify these Guidelines. ARB staff clarifications will be made available at 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/gmbond to assist local agencies with Program implementation. 

2. Provisions that do not apply to projects receiving FY2007-08 

funds 

ARB staff evaluated the 2008 Guidelines, including project specifications, and 

developed updates. The changes in the updated 2010 Guidelines apply to projects 

receiving FY2007-08 funds, with the exception of the provisions listed in Table II.1. 

Table II.1 Provisions that Do Not Apply to Projects Receiving FY2007-08 Funds 

Provision Description 

Equipment Project 

Specifications 

(Appendices A-F)

Appendix F shows applicable equipment project specifications for 

FY2007-08 funded projects. The equipment project specifications 

shown in Appendices A-E apply only to projects receiving 

FY2008-09 and later funds. 

New Compliance Check 

Option 

(Chap. IV.A.8.)

A local agency may not allow applicants in a solicitation for 

FY2007-08 funds to correct pollution citations that were 

outstanding at the time of application to avoid disqualification. 

Project Alternatives for 

Local Agencies 

(Chap. III.C.) 

Local agencies administering FY2007-08 funds shall implement 

the approved project alternatives described in their grant 

agreements, despite any changes to those alternatives in these 

Guidelines. 

Equipment Project 

Contract Requirements 

(Chap. IV.A.11.) 

Local agencies administering FY2007-08 funds are not required 

to amend equipment project contracts to include any additional 

provisions required in these Guidelines. 

Local Agency Timelines 

for Obligation and 

Expenditure of Funds 

(Chap. II.F. and IV.B.) 

FY2007-08 funds must be obligated and expended by local 

agencies according to the timelines defined in the applicable grant 

agreement, including any amendment(s). FY2008-09 and later 

funds shall be obligated and expended according to the 

schedules in these Guidelines. 

Local Agency 

Administration Funds 

(Chap. II.F.2.a) 

Local agency administration funds for projects receiving FY2007-

08 funds are set on the schedule and at the level defined in the 

grant agreement, and may not be accelerated or increased to 

higher levels based on these Guidelines. 

State Agency Loan or 

Loan Guarantee 

Program 

(Chap. II.D.) 

FY2007-08 funds may not be used for loan or loan guarantee 

programs. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 21 March 2010 

 Administration

B. Program Funding Targets and Priorities 

The Board approved funding targets for each trade corridor and each source category 

or groups of categories (referred to as a funding category). These targets provide 

overall direction for the Program, and guide each trade corridor in the development of 

viable project proposals. Such targets can help ensure that all of the statutory criteria 

are effectively implemented in a straightforward and transparent manner. These targets 

do not commit the Board to specific allocations in future years and are not considered a 

programming of funds to specific local agency projects. Funding for local agency 

projects in each individual funding cycle is responsive to priorities established by the 

Board and may not be directly proportional to the targets. ARB staff shall recommend 

funding levels for local (and State) agency projects that are designed to reach the 

targets over the course of the entire $1 billion Program. 

1. Trade corridor funding targets 

While SB 88 does not explicitly require an allocation by trade corridor, it does direct 

ARB to identify a means to consider an air basin’s attainment status for State and 

federal air quality standards and its health risk from goods movement. ARB staff 

believes this is most efficiently and effectively done by targeting funding to each trade 

corridor based on population, goods movement emissions, and federal attainment 

needs. These targets also ensure that California residents in each defined trade 

corridor see benefits from the Program. Finally, such targets facilitate a transparent and 

open discussion of the optimum funding splits to reduce the contribution of goods 

movement sources to each region’s toughest air pollution challenges. The 2008 Staff 

Report describes the basis for the targets. 

The funding targets for each trade corridor, including all State and local Program 

administration funds, are: 

Dollars Trade Corridor

• $550 million: Los Angeles/Inland Empire trade corridor 

• $250 million: Central Valley trade corridor 

• $140 million: Bay Area trade corridor 

• $ 60 million: San Diego/Border trade corridor 

Since this Program looks at the trade corridors as part of a single goods movement 

system for California, local agencies administering bond monies shall be required to 

fund projects based on the total emission reductions expected in the State (not just their 

local area). The majority of the travel or operation must be in one or more of the trade 

corridors. Regions like the San Joaquin Valley with high through-truck and rail traffic 

will benefit from projects administered by local agencies in other trade corridors. 

The funding for trucks serving ports and intermodal rail yards (allocated to the corridors 

where those facilities are located) will be available for all California trucks focused on 

that service, regardless of their home base. Thus, cleanup funds allocated to the 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 22 March 2010 

 Administration

Bay Area for the Port of Oakland may go to trucks carrying agricultural products to and 

from the Central Valley. Likewise, funds for the ports in the Los Angeles area may go to 

trucks based in the San Diego/Border region. 

2. Category funding targets 

SB 88 recognizes the need for projects to compete against others in the same funding 

category, not against projects in other funding categories. To implement this approach, 

set portions of the funding are targeted to each funding category, which may include 

one or more source categories. Category funding targets support the reduction in local 

and regional health risk from goods movement as a primary consideration. The 2008 

Staff Report describes the basis for the original targets, and the 2010 Staff Report 

describes the basis for the revisions. 

The targets for each funding category, including all State and local Program 

administration funds, are: 

Dollars Funding Category

$700 million: Heavy duty diesel trucks that haul goods, plus any truck stop or 

distribution center electrification. 

$100 million: Diesel freight locomotives. 

$160 million: Cargo ships at berth, plus cargo handling equipment used at a port 

or intermodal rail yard. 

$ 40 million: Commercial harbor craft. 

The Board directed ARB staff to manage the funds to reserve up to $100 million of the 

combined truck monies to assist existing drayage truck owners to complete the second 

phase of upgrades to reduce NOx in advance of the 2014 requirement. These priority 

funds for drayage trucks are in addition to the $125 million of FY2007-08 funds 

expended for this purpose. 

3. Priorities for FY2007-08 funds 

The Board adopted these priorities for FY2007-08 funds: 

• Eligible projects that can quickly begin implementation and deliver air quality results. 

This is consistent with statutory direction to give priority to projects that achieve the 

earliest possible reduction of health risk in heavily impacted communities. These 

could be communities with high risks due to nearby goods movement facilities or 

communities impacted by high regional pollution levels from goods movement 

emissions. 

• Truck retrofit projects to add diesel particulate filters for immediate, broad scale, 

cost-effective risk reduction in many communities. Based on the implementation 

schedules in related truck regulations, we expect that these projects would only be 

eligible for FY2007-08 funding. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 23 March 2010 

 Administration

• Port truck replacement projects in the Los Angeles/Inland Empire corridor to 

continue supporting the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach clean truck 

tariff programs. These ports are requiring that all drayage trucks serving the ports 

be replaced (with models meeting 2007 emission standards) between late 2008 and 

the end of 2011. This schedule means any financial assistance from the Program 

needs to come in the early years. 

4. Priorities for FY2008-09 and FY2009-10 funds 

ARB staff proposes that the Board adopt these priorities for FY2008-09 and FY2009-10 

funds: 

• Truck upgrade projects to quickly reduce the health risk in communities near high 

truck-traffic freeways, warehouse/distribution centers, ports, and rail yards. These 

projects also provide significant reductions to help meet federal air quality standards 

for regional air pollutants, including PM2.5 and ozone. This is consistent with 

statutory direction to give priority to projects that achieve the earliest possible 

reduction of health risk in heavily impacted communities. To support cost-effective 

early compliance with ARB’s truck rules, the truck funds need to be front-loaded. 

• Locomotive projects to cut the elevated, excess cancer risks in neighborhoods near 

rail yards, as identified in ARB’s health risk assessments. The California State 

Implementation Plan relies on incentives and other mechanisms to accelerate the 

introduction of cleaner locomotives and/or engines to attain federal PM2.5 and 

ozone standards in the South Coast and San Joaquin Valley. 

• Ships at berth projects to further reduce diesel pollution in port-side communities 

and greenhouse gas emissions. To comply with the January 2014 requirements of 

ARB’s rule, these multi-year projects to install electric infrastructure to provide shorebased power to ships at berth must begin soon. With incentives, some of these 

installations may be able to begin operation early and to achieve extra reductions 

each year through greater use. 

C. Project Specifications and Emissions 

1. Project specifications for each funding cycle 

Appendices A-E detail the equipment project options, including upgrade specifications, 

funding caps, minimum project life, and key operating conditions. For reference 

purposes, Appendix F provides the equipment project specifications that apply only to 

projects receiving FY2007-08 funds. Local agencies can choose to propose projects for 

any or all of the funding categories to best address the air pollution problem in that trade 

corridor. For future appropriations and updates to these Guidelines, ARB staff shall 

also consider the funding demand for eligible project options, technology advances and 

costs, regulatory actions, the need for equipment eligibility and project requirements, 

and other new information. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 24 March 2010 

 Administration

SB 88 identifies projects eligible for funding to include: 

• The replacement, repower, or retrofit of heavy-duty diesel trucks. 

- The equipment project options for Program funds include all of these 

approaches. 

• The replacement, repower, or retrofit of diesel locomotive engines, with priority given 

to switcher locomotive engines. 

- The equipment project options for FY2007-08 funds include replacement and 

repower approaches. The new options include replacement, rebuild, repower, 

and retrofit approaches, as well as an emerging locomotive emissions capture 

and control system. 

• The provision of on-shore electrical power for ocean freight carriers calling at the 

State’s seaports to reduce the use of auxiliary and main engine ship power at berth. 

- The equipment project options for Program funds include this type of technology. 

• Mobile or portable shoreside distributed power generation projects that eliminate the 

need to use the electricity grid. 

- The equipment project options for Program funds include this type of technology, 

as well as an emerging ship emissions capture and control system. 

• The replacement, repower, or retrofit of harbor craft that operate at the State’s 

seaports. 

- The equipment project options for Program funds include replacement and 

repower approaches. The new options also include replacement and retrofit with 

hybrid technology.

- The replacement, repower, or retrofit of cargo handling equipment that operates 

at the State’s seaports and rail yards. 

- ARB’s adopted regulation for diesel cargo handling equipment operating at ports 

and intermodal rail yards requires this equipment to be upgraded to emission 

levels achievable through replacement or (possibly) repower. To ensure that the 

eligible projects in this category meet the statutory requirement to reduce 

emissions not otherwise required by law or regulation, and are cost-effective, the 

equipment project options for FY2007-08 funds include only retrofit of energy 

storage systems for rubber-tired gantry cranes that already comply with the ARB 

rule. The new options include the repower of rubber-tired gantry cranes with an 

electric or zero-emission power system, and replacement of certain yard trucks 

with electric or zero-emission yard models that will reduce emissions beyond the 

requirements of the regulation. 

• Electrification infrastructure to reduce engine idling and use of internal combustion 

auxiliary power systems at truck stops, intermodal facilities, distribution centers, and 

other places where trucks congregate. 

- The equipment project options for Program funds include this technology. 

Following each appropriation of Program funds to ARB, ARB staff shall evaluate and 

recommend for Board adoption specifications for equipment project options eligible to 

compete for funding in that cycle. These options must be able to cost-effectively reduce 

emissions and health risk with a high degree of certainty. ARB staff shall assess the list 

of emission reduction projects identified in SB 88 for technical feasibility, emission 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 25 March 2010 

 Administration

reduction potential, and cost. ARB staff shall also consider other effective technology 

that is verified, available, and can be widely deployed to reduce emissions quickly. 

Certain types of projects or activities shall not be eligible for funding under the Program. 

Such ineligible projects or activities include, but are not limited to: 

• Projects to design, acquire rights-of-way, perform environmental review, build, 

improve, or operate transportation infrastructure (like roads, bridges, or 

interchanges; rail yards, tracks or sidings; rail or highway tunnel widening; railroad 

crossing grade separations; ship channel dredging; etc.). 

• Projects to design, acquire rights-of-way, perform environmental review, build, 

improve, or operate intermodal transfer or distribution centers (also called inland 

ports), except for electrification infrastructure to reduce engine idling and use of 

internal combustion auxiliary power systems at truck stops, intermodal facilities, 

distribution centers, and other places where trucks congregate. 

• Scientific or technical research and development activities, including programs to 

perform emissions testing on new technology. 

• Business plan development or implementation. 

• Equipment, vehicles, or ship berths owned or leased by the federal government, 

including the military. 

• Fuel or electricity purchases. 

• Operation and maintenance costs. 

• Legal costs. 

• Permit fees or taxes. 

• Any other projects that cannot meet all of the requirements of these Guidelines. 

The timing and resource demands to get Program funds obligated effectively preclude 

case-by-case consideration of projects. If a local agency supports demonstration of a 

cost-effective technology or approach that is consistent with the statute, ARB staff shall 

evaluate that technology for possible inclusion in the defined equipment project options 

in the next update to these Guidelines. 

2. Quantifying project benefits 

a) Pollutants 

SB 88 identifies specific pollutants that are targeted for emission reductions under the 

Program: 

• Diesel particulate matter (diesel PM), which ARB identified as a toxic air 

contaminant. 

• Nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur oxides (SOx) that contribute to fine particles 

(PM2.5) formed in the atmosphere. 

• NOx and reactive organic gases (ROG) that form ozone in the atmosphere. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 26 March 2010 

 Administration

SB 88 also adds reductions in greenhouse gases as a criterion to consider in evaluating 

which projects to fund. 

As part of simplifying the Program, the Guidelines require quantification of diesel PM 

and NOx emissions and the resulting reductions from bond-funded projects. These are 

the two most consistently important pollutants to reduce the health impacts from goods 

movement in all four trade corridors, and the most likely to differ between competing 

proposals within the same source category. 

Of the targeted source categories, only ships are still significant sources of SOx 

emissions. Shore power projects to reduce ship emissions at berth will effectively cut 

this pollutant. It is not necessary to quantify the SOx emission reductions from each 

competing shore power project. Comparing the reductions in diesel PM and NOx 

emissions is an adequate basis to assess shore power project proposals relative to 

others in the same source category. Diesel engines emit ROG, but emission levels are 

typically less than 1/10 of the NOx emissions, therefore should also not be a 

determining factor in project selection. 

ARB staff considered greenhouse gas emissions in recommending the source category 

funding targets, specifically the amount allotted for shore power and cargo equipment 

projects that reduce fuel consumption. Since projects are competing within funding 

categories, there is no need to quantify greenhouse gas reductions from individual 

projects to support the competitive process. 

b) Project benefits calculators 

ARB staff shall develop and make available on the Program website at: 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/gmbond a Project Benefits Calculator (Calculator) for each 

source category eligible for funding under these Guidelines. These Calculators shall 

provide the basis for local agencies to quantify the emission reductions and costeffectiveness of proposed local agency projects. If a local agency identifies an eligible 

local agency project that cannot be quantified with the Calculator for that source 

category, the local agency should contact ARB staff for guidance. The Calculators shall 

also provide the basis for local agencies and equipment owners to quantify the emission 

reductions and cost-effectiveness of proposed equipment projects. Over time, ARB 

staff shall build the emission reductions and cost-effectiveness calculator functions into 

the Goods Movement Online Database. 

D. Provision for Truck Loan or Loan Guarantee Programs 

ARB may make funding available for loan or loan guarantee programs. For the purpose 

of administering a loan or loan guarantee program (loan project) only, an applicant may 

be any State agency, including ARB [H&S §39625.1(a)]. 

Funds for a loan project may be provided from bond proceeds or through recaptured 

funds. For any loan project, ARB or other State agency may administer the program 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 27 March 2010 

 Administration

directly or may use contractors, such as established non-profit organizations, 

commercial lenders, truck financing companies, community development banks, and 

small business assistance entities, to administer the program. Any use of an external 

contractor requires the State agency to comply with applicable State contracting 

requirements. 

The intent of offering Program funds for loan projects is to provide financial assistance 

and expand financing opportunities for owners of smaller truck fleets who are 

experiencing difficulty in obtaining financing to upgrade or replace their vehicles with 

cleaner technology. 

Loan programs may include: 

• Direct loans (Program funds are used to make a loan directly to the equipment 

owner). 

• Loan guarantees (Program funds are used to create a loan loss reserve to 

guarantee a loan made by a lender). 

• Loan or interest rate subsidies (Program funds are used to buy down the interest 

rate). 

• Lease-to-own (Program funds are used to subsidize a leasing program where the 

lessee takes ownership of the vehicle at the end of the lease). 

The California Pollution Control Financing Authority’s (CPCFA) California Capital 

Access Program (CalCAP), a form of loan portfolio insurance, is an example of a loan 

guarantee program. ARB’s Providing Loan Assistance for California Equipment 

(PLACE) is an example of a program that provides both loan and loan guarantee 

programs utilizing partnerships with a State agency and contractors. 

State agencies may apply for Program funds for loan projects that may include one of 

the above-described options or a similar program for equipment owners to retrofit or 

replace trucks. 

Because there are many options and ways to implement a loan project, ARB requires 

that any proposed loan project meet the following conditions: 

• Use funds to upgrade or replace eligible diesel trucks according to the project 

specifications in Appendix A. 

• Adhere to any financial terms and conditions established by ARB staff in the grant or 

interagency agreement, which may include interest rate, loan term, and minimum 

credit requirements. 

• Funds used for direct loans or lease-to-own projects must be used to implement a 

sustainable project (repayments will be used to provide additional loans or leases). 

• Funds used for loan guarantees must provide a minimum leverage established by 

ARB. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 28 March 2010 

 Administration

The Executive Officer has the authority to approve the structure and conditions of any 

proposed loan project to provide increased assistance to independent owner-operators 

and smaller trucking fleets. 

See Chapter V.A. for State agency project implementation requirements. 

E. ARB Process to Award Funds to Local and State Agencies

1. Notice of funding availability 

ARB staff shall issue a notice of funding availability (NOFA) no later than November 30th

of each fiscal year in which funds are appropriated or reappropriated by the Legislature, 

unless staff determines that the Guidelines should be updated for those funds. For 

FY2007-08 funding, ARB shall issue the NOFA within two weeks of Board adoption of 

the Guidelines. For FY2008-09 and FY2009-10 funding, ARB shall issue the NOFA 

following Board adoption of the update to the Guidelines, consistent with state fiscal 

policy. 

The NOFA shall include: 

• Registration instructions for local public entities seeking Program funds, including 

concurrent submittal of a demonstration that the local public entity qualifies as an 

applicant for Program funds. 

• Submittal instructions and schedule for local agency project applications. 

• The requirement that each applicant hold at least one community meeting prior to 

the submittal of the local agency project application to ARB (see Chapter III.D.). 

2. Qualification of applicants 

The statute requires an applicant for Program funds to be both a local public entity and 

one that is involved in the movement of freight through trade corridors or involved in air 

quality improvements associated with goods movement. For the purpose of 

administering a loan or loan guarantee program only, an applicant may include any 

State of California agency. Local public entities do not include states or the federal 

government. A “local public entity” is defined to include a county, city, district, public 

authority created by statute, public agency, and any other political subdivision in the 

State. 

The first step in the application process is for a local public entity to register with ARB 

through the process described in the NOFA. ARB staff shall verify the status of the 

local public entity and provide access to the electronic application form for each verified 

local public entity. 

Concurrent with the registration, the local public entity will also provide its qualifications 

for eligibility as a Program applicant so that ARB staff can begin the initial review of this 

demonstration. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 29 March 2010 

 Administration

ARB staff shall assess each local public entity’s qualifications to determine if that entity 

meets the requirements of the statute and the Guidelines for applicants. ARB staff may 

request that the local public entity provide additional documentation to support this 

assessment. 

A local public entity that qualifies as a Program applicant may also be referred to as an 

applicant or a local agency. 

3. Review of local and State agency applications 

ARB staff shall complete an initial review of each local and State agency project 

application to verify that the proposed project is consistent with these Guidelines and is 

eligible to compete for funding. 

ARB staff shall notify any local and State agency that does not meet all of the 

requirements of paragraphs (a)-(g) of this section within 20 business days of ARB 

receipt of the completed application package. Notification may occur via letter or email 

to the designated local or State agency contact, at ARB staff’s discretion. 

ARB staff shall evaluate any deficiencies and determine, at staff’s discretion, whether to 

disqualify the application or pursue resolution of any deficiencies with the local or State 

agency. 

ARB staff shall post a list of eligible local and State agency project applications on the 

Program website for public review no later than 30 days after local and State agency 

project applications are due to ARB.

a) Completeness 

ARB staff shall review a local or State agency project application to determine whether 

all required information is included in the application. At a minimum, ARB staff shall 

verify that the application is complete and includes a copy of the local agency 

board/commission resolution. 

b) Consistency with legal and equipment project specifications 

ARB staff shall review the local or State agency project application and assess the 

agency’s certification that the proposed project achieves emission reductions “not 

otherwise required by law or regulation.” ARB staff shall also evaluate whether the 

proposed project conforms to the specifications for the desired funding category. 

Proposals that combine multiple funding categories or that would allow emissions, 

equipment, technology, or Program funding levels that are inconsistent with one or more 

equipment project options defined in these Guidelines are subject to disqualification. 

In addition, for any local agency project to retrofit, repower, or replace locomotives 

operated by the Class I railroads, ARB shall evaluate whether the emission reductions 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 30 March 2010 

 Administration

that would be achieved by the locomotive equipment project are or are not necessary to 

satisfy any mandated emission reduction requirement under an agreement between a 

railroad company and a State or federal agency, or a local air district. ARB must find 

that the emission reductions are not necessary to determine that the local agency 

project is eligible to compete for funding [H&S §39625.5(a)(2)(B)]. 

c) Consistency with air quality plans for goods movement 

ARB staff shall assess the local or State agency project application to determine if it 

meets the requirement for consistency with local and regional plans (or regional 

elements of statewide plans) to reduce emissions from goods movement. 

d) Availability of full funding 

ARB staff shall assess the local or State agency project application to determine if it 

clearly identifies the source(s) of any State and non-State matching funds, and 

demonstrates that these funds are reasonably available within the timeframes of the 

project schedule. 

e) Project schedule and milestones 

ARB staff shall assess the local or State agency project application to determine if it 

identifies the required project milestones and includes a demonstration of the agency’s 

ability to meet the timelines of these Guidelines for fund obligation and expenditure. 

f) Data to determine air quality benefits and cost-effectiveness 

ARB staff shall evaluate the local or State agency project application to verify that it 

includes sufficient data to support calculation of the emission reduction factor and costeffectiveness factor for the proposed project.

g) Project implementation demonstration 

ARB staff shall evaluate the local or State agency project application to determine if it 

effectively demonstrates that the agency is prepared to administer the proposed project 

consistent with the detailed provisions of Chapter IV. or Chapter V., respectively. 

4. ARB evaluation of local or State agency capability to 

implement the project scope 

ARB staff shall assess the local or State agency project application to determine if it 

affirmatively demonstrates that the local or State agency has or will have the necessary 

expertise and resources in place to meet the demands of the proposed project scope, 

within the timelines established by these Guidelines. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 31 March 2010 

 Administration

ARB staff shall examine the local or State agency’s documented statistics or other basis 

for establishing the relationship between the number of pieces of equipment that can be 

upgraded in a given timeframe and the number of program staff needed to accomplish 

those upgrade projects. ARB staff shall rely on the documentation provided by the local 

or State agency and ARB’s experience with this Program, the Carl Moyer Program, and 

other incentive programs to assess the adequacy of the proposed staff resources. If 

ARB staff determines that the local or State agency has demonstrated the ability to 

handle the project type, but only at a lesser scope or scale than proposed, staff may 

identify an alternative scope. 

For example, a local agency may propose to replace 5,000 trucks, but only 

demonstrate the resources and ability to process 2,000 trucks within the 

timelines established in these Guidelines. ARB staff may disqualify the 

application or recommend that the project go forward to the competitive process 

with a scope of 2,000 truck replacements (at a pro-rated funding level). 

If ARB staff determines that only a lesser scope is feasible based on the local agency’s 

demonstration, ARB staff shall notify the designated local agency representative in 

writing and move the project forward to the competitive process based on the benefits of 

the pro-rated proposal for the funding category. ARB staff shall assume local agency 

support for a pro-rated proposal based on the acknowledgement required on the 

application. 

5. Match funding 

SB 88 distinguishes between State funds and monies from all other non-State sources. 

It also directs ARB to maximize the amount of match funds used to supplement 

Program funds. The match required to cover the difference between the Program 

funding cap and the total project cost can come from the private sector, local agencies, 

other State monies, or the federal government. Private match funding can be provided 

by the equipment owner, an industry sponsored program, or other sources. 

See Chapter IV.A.6. for information on match funding for equipment projects. 

6. Competitive ranking of local or State agency projects 

ARB staff shall use a quantitative approach to develop a prioritized list of eligible local 

and State agency projects. This process will be applied to competing local agency 

projects within each trade corridor and funding category. ARB staff shall publish the list 

of competitively ranked local agency projects on the Program website, as well as the list 

of eligible State agency projects for truck loans. 

The competitive ranking shall be quantitatively based on multiple factors – emission 

reductions and a measure of cost-effectiveness that considers match funding. The 

calculation of emission reductions uses the Carl Moyer Program protocol of weighting 

combustion PM emissions (essentially diesel PM) by a factor of 20 relative to other 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 32 March 2010 

 Administration

pollutants to account for the greater health impacts of PM per ton of emissions. This 

protocol helps target Program funding to the local agency projects that will achieve the 

greatest reduction in health risk. 

a) Emission reduction score 

Weighted emission reductions = Reduction in NOx + (combustion PM x 20) 

emissions in California over the average project life in pounds 

ARB staff shall list local agency projects in descending order of emission reductions, 

with the greatest emission reductions on top and the lowest emission reductions on the 

bottom. ARB staff shall number or score each project starting at the bottom with a 

score of 1 and continuing consecutively to the top project. For example, if there are 

8 project proposals, the one with the greatest emission reductions would receive a 

score of 8. See Figure II.1 for an example. 

Emission Reductions Score = number from above evaluation 

b) Cost-effectiveness and match score 

For each proposed project in a funding category, ARB staff shall review the local 

agency’s estimate of the total pollutant-weighted emission reductions, divided by the 

total State funding proposed for the project, based on the Calculator for that source 

category. Total State funding includes requested Program funds (project and 

administration funds), plus any other applicable State dollars (see Chapter IV.A.6.). 

Cost-effectiveness = weighted emission reductions (lbs)/total applicable State $ 

ARB staff shall list local agency projects in descending order of emission reductions per 

State dollar, with the highest number on top and the lowest number on the bottom. ARB 

staff shall number or score each project starting at the bottom with a score of 1 and 

continuing consecutively to the top project. For example, with 8 project proposals, the 

one with the greatest emission reductions per State dollar would receive a score of 8. 

See Figure II.1 for an example. 

Cost-Effectiveness Score = number from above evaluation 

This calculation of cost-effectiveness indirectly accounts for the level of match funding. 

A project will always have a combination of Program funding and match funding (from 

State or non-State sources) to cover the total cost of the project. The cost-effectiveness 

equation uses the full weighted emission reductions achieved by the total project 

funding, not just a subset of the reductions in proportion to the State funding 

component. By counting the total weighted emission reductions, the Program 

recognizes the benefits of non-State match funds and offers a competitive advantage to 

local agency projects with greater match. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 33 March 2010 

 Administration

For example, assume the Program offers funding for up to 50 percent of the cost of new 

equipment, with the other 50 percent covered by non-State match funds (resulting in a 

1:1 match). Most project proponents seek the maximum Program funds, but 

proponent X only requests Program funding for 25 percent of the total cost, with the 

other 75 percent covered by non-State match funds (effectively providing a 3:1 match). 

The emission reductions for all the projects would likely be similar, but the total 

reductions per State dollar are much greater for proponent X because this project relies 

on less State funds and more match funds. 

Figure II.1 Local agencies A,B,C submit 

competing truck projects (hypothetical)

C-5,299 tons Score: 1

B-6,056 tons Score: 2

A-7,570 tons Score: 3

Emission

Reduction Score

C-0.4 lbs/$ Score: 2

B-0.5 lbs/$ Score: 3

A-0.3 lbs/$ Score: 1

Cost-Effectiveness 

Score

Project C: 1+2 3 points

Project A: 3+1 4 points

Project B: 2+3 5 points

Competitive Ranking

C/ Replace 

700 trucks

B/ Replace 

800 trucks

A/ Replace 

1,000 trucks

Agency/ 

Project

State 

Dollars

Weighted 

Emission 

Reductions 

(tons)

Reductions over 

8-Year Project Life

5,299

6,056

7,570

NOx tons PM tons

2,219

2,536

3,170

154

176

220

$28M at 

$40k/truck

$24M at 

$30k/truck

$50M at 

$50k/truck

Results from Project Benefits Calculator:
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 34 March 2010 

 Administration

c) Competitive ranking 

ARB staff shall add the Emission Reductions Score to the Cost-Effectiveness Score to 

determine the final points for each local agency project. ARB staff shall rank local 

agency projects within each trade corridor and funding category from highest points to 

lowest points. See Figure II.1 for an example. 

ARB staff shall assess the costs and benefits of any State agency proposals for truck 

loan projects, and rank those projects against each other, if appropriate. 

7. Public workshops on eligible local and State agency projects 

ARB staff shall hold no less than three public workshops statewide to discuss the 

competitively ranked list of eligible local and State agency projects and any preliminary 

ARB staff recommendations for funding projects. At least one workshop each will be 

held in northern California, the Central Valley, and southern California. At ARB staff’s 

discretion, these workshops may be conducted between release of the competitive 

ranking and development of funding recommendations or after development of ARB 

staff funding recommendations. For FY2007-08 funds, these workshops were not 

required by statute [H&S §39626(c)(2)]. 

8. Recommendations for funding local and State agency projects 

Based on the competitively ranked list of eligible local agency projects and public input, 

ARB staff shall use a qualitative approach to develop recommendations on the level of 

funding for the top project(s) in each trade corridor and funding category. This 

approach shall consider the availability of Program funds, the trade corridor and 

category funding targets, and priorities established by the Board for each funding cycle. 

ARB staff shall also consider project proposals from any State agency for truck loan or 

loan guarantee programs. 

ARB staff shall make these funding recommendations for local and State agency 

projects available to the public via the Program website prior to the public hearing 

conducted by the Board. 

ARB staff shall follow this process: 

a) Consideration of available funds and funding priorities 

Starting with the project with the highest competitive ranking, ARB staff shall compare 

the requested Program dollars with the available funds, the Program funding targets for 

the trade corridor and funding category, and any priorities identified by the Board for 

those funds. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 35 March 2010 

 Administration

b) Funding level for project proposals 

ARB staff shall recommend whether the most competitive local agency project in each 

trade corridor and funding category should be funded in whole, in part, or not at all in 

that funding cycle. ARB staff may recommend pro-rating the requested Program 

funding and the estimated performance measures (pieces of equipment, emission 

reductions, etc.) based on the available dollars and funding priorities. 

Once the recommended funding is determined for the top project, ARB staff shall 

evaluate the project with the second highest competitive ranking in consideration of 

available funds and funding priorities. ARB staff shall continue until the appropriate 

level of funding for that trade corridor and category – in that funding cycle – is reached.

Based on the process described above for evaluating and ranking eligible local agency 

projects, as well as assessing the funding level, ARB staff shall issue its written 

recommendations to the Board for local agency project funding with the available grant 

funds, as well as any funding to State agencies for truck loan and loan guarantee 

programs. 

9. Public hearing and Board action 

The Board will hold a noticed public hearing to consider public testimony, written 

comments, and ARB staff recommendations for funding local agency projects and loan 

and loan guarantee programs with the available Program monies. At that hearing, the 

Board may adopt a resolution approving a final list of primary local agency projects, loan 

projects, and corresponding funding amounts for each project. This project list may 

identify ARB as an administering State agency for a loan project and the funds allocated 

for that purpose. This Board resolution initially obligates the funds, and provides ARB 

staff with the authority to enter into grant agreements or interagency agreements with 

the selected agencies, when bond funds are available [H&S §39626(c)(3)]. The ARB 

Executive Officer may delegate in writing the ability to sign agreements to another 

individual or individuals on ARB’s executive management team. 

The project list approved by the Board may also identify “backup” proposals (additional 

local or State agency projects or increases in funding levels for the approved projects). 

These backup proposals may be awarded funding if agreements cannot be executed for 

one or more of the primary projects within the timeframe specified by the Board in the 

resolution, a local or State agency is unable to expend all of the Program funds or fulfill 

its obligations, or a local or State agency requests to terminate or transfer its grant. 

10. Local agency grant agreement 

The Board’s funding decisions shall become legally enforceable through executed grant 

agreements between ARB and the selected local agencies. Each local agency project 

requires a separate local agency grant agreement. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 36 March 2010 

 Administration

ARB staff shall prepare and submit for review and signature two copies of the local 

agency grant agreement to each local agency approved for bond funding. The copies 

may be signed by ARB and then sent to the local agency for signature by an authorized 

representative from the local agency that will retain one fully executed copy for its files, 

and return one fully executed copy to ARB staff. Or ARB may send two copies to the 

local agency for signature by an authorized representative who will return both copies to 

ARB. ARB staff shall sign and return to the local agency one fully executed copy of the 

grant agreement for its files. 

Each grant agreement with a local agency shall include, but is not limited to, the 

following elements. 

a) Standard grant agreement provisions 

• Grant agreement number—unique tracking number provided by ARB. 

• Effective date. 

• Term of grant agreement. 

• Local agency contact information. 

• Indemnification—local agency agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the State for 

any liability arising out of the performance by the local agency. 

• Severability—remaining provisions of an agreement continue in effect even if a court 

holds a specific provision invalid. 

• Force majeure—ARB and local agency are not liable for any delay or failure in 

performance resulting from war, natural disasters, and other acts beyond their 

control. 

• Grant agreement amendments—amendments shall only occur by mutual agreement 

in writing and signed by all parties. 

• Environmental justice—local agency agrees to conduct its programs in a manner 

that ensures the fair treatment of all people in the State. 

• ARB’s obligations to pay any funds are contingent upon the availability of funds. In 

the event funds are not available, the State shall have no liability to pay any funds to 

the local agency or to furnish any other considerations. 

b) General Program provisions 

• Application—incorporate by reference the original local agency application and 

board/commission resolution. 

• Guidelines—local agency agrees to implement project in conformance with all 

applicable requirements of these Guidelines. 

• Reporting requirements—local agency is responsible for submitting to ARB quarterly 

data updates, semi-annual reports, and local agency project completion reports, 

when requested by ARB staff. 

• Ongoing evaluations and audits—local agency agrees to allow ongoing evaluations 

and audits by ARB, other State agencies, or their designated representative(s). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 37 March 2010 

 Administration

• Records access requirements—local agency agrees to allow ARB or its designated 

representative(s) access to evaluate or audit Program records. 

• Recordkeeping requirements—local agency agrees to retain Program records, e.g., 

invoices, contracts, and correspondence, for 35 years after the bond issuance date 

providing the funds for the grant or to send all records to ARB by the end date of the 

grant agreement in an electronic format to be determined by ARB. 

• Enforcement—provisions authorizing ARB or its designee to inspect equipment 

projects. 

• Non-performance includes, but is not limited to: 

- Failure to comply with these Guidelines or statutes. 

- Failure to obligate or expend Program funds within established timelines, or to 

show timely interim progress to meet these timelines. 

- Insufficient performance or widespread deficiencies with Program oversight, 

enforcement, record keeping, contracting provisions, inspections, audit 

procedures or any other Program element as determined by ARB. 

- Misuse of Program funds. 

- Funding of ineligible equipment projects or other items. 

- Exceeding administrative fund allotment. 

- Insufficient, incomplete, or faulty project documentation. 

- Failure to provide required documentation or reports requested from ARB, DOF, 

or other agencies in a timely manner. 

- Poor performance as determined by an audit conducted by ARB, DOF, or other 

designee. 

• Remedies for non-performance include: 

- Probation. 

- Recovery of funds. 

- Constraints on opportunity to compete for future Program funds. 

• Direct payments to vendor—requirement for local agency to offer payments directly 

to vehicle or equipment dealers or manufacturers if requested by equipment owner. 

• Tax implications—local agency agrees to notify equipment owners of possible tax 

implications from receipt of Program funds and encourage participants to consult a 

tax professional. 

• Program acknowledgment—local agency agrees to acknowledge the Program as a 

funding source in any related media events or other publicity material. 

• Earned interest—local agency agrees to maintain records and report on interest 

earned on Program funds in local agency accounts, and to expend earned interest 

according to the provisions in these Guidelines. 

• Recapture—ability of ARB to recapture Program funds. 

c) Funding category-specific elements 

• Local agency project description. 

• Estimated total cost for project. 

• Eligible costs—costs directly tied to the purchase and installation of upgraded 

equipment or other eligible equipment project costs as defined in the Guidelines or 

accompanying Staff Report. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 38 March 2010 

 Administration

• Ineligible costs—any cost specifically identified as ineligible in the Guidelines or 

accompanying Staff Report cannot be paid for or reimbursed with Program funds. 

• Funding caps for each equipment project. 

• Total grant amount. 

• Total amount of non-State match funds and source of funds. 

• Project performance benchmarks—expected number of vehicles, pieces of 

equipment, berths, etc., to be upgraded and expected emission reductions. 

• Project schedule—timeframe for completing the local agency project including major 

milestones and any milestones specific to each equipment project option. 

• Expenditure schedule—estimated schedule for ARB to expend funds to the local 

agency. 

• Request for payment—steps for a local agency to request expenditure of Program 

funds. 

• Equipment project inspections—local agency agrees to complete equipment project 

pre-inspections prior to execution of an equipment project contract (or following 

contract execution but prior to placement of purchase order at the local agency’s 

option) and post-inspections prior to reimbursement (except in the case of direct 

payment to vendor). 

• Equipment project contracts—local agency agrees to include all equipment project 

requirements and conditions (e.g., restrictions on operating location, provisions for 

electronic monitoring devices, etc.) in contracts with equipment owners. 

• Proper disposal of old equipment—local agency agrees to establish agreements with 

qualified salvage yards and verify scrappage/disposal of old vehicle, vessel, 

equipment, or engine, and to comply with any ARB direction to make trucks 

available for reuse. 

• Small businesses—outreach to small businesses for infrastructure construction. 

11. State agency loan and loan guarantee program interagency 

agreement 

The Board’s funding decisions shall become legally enforceable through executed 

interagency agreements between ARB staff and the selected State agencies, unless 

ARB is the selected State agency. Each State agency project requires a separate 

interagency agreement. 

ARB, if required, will enter into an interagency agreement with a State agency to 

implement a loan or loan guarantee program (loan project). ARB staff shall obtain all 

authorized State signatures and return to the other State agency one fully executed 

copy of the interagency agreement for its files. An interagency agreement is not 

required if ARB is the applicant and recipient of the Program funds. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 39 March 2010 

 Administration

The interagency agreement includes, but is not limited to, the following elements: 

a) Standard interagency agreement provisions 

• Interagency agreement number—unique tracking number provided by ARB. 

• Effective date. 

• Term of agreement. 

• State agency contact information. 

• Agreement amendments—amendments shall only occur by mutual agreement in 

writing and signed by all parties. 

• Enforcement—provisions authorizing ARB or its designee to inspect equipment 

projects. 

• Program acknowledgment—State agency agrees to acknowledge the Program as a 

funding source in any related media events or other publicity material. 

• Non-performance includes, but is not limited to: 

- Failure to comply with these Guidelines or statutes. 

- Failure to obligate or expend Program funds within established timelines, or to 

show timely interim progress to meet these timelines. 

- Insufficient performance or widespread deficiencies with Program oversight, 

enforcement, record keeping, contracting provisions, inspections, audit 

procedures or any other Program element as determined by ARB. 

- Misuse of Program funds. 

- Funding of ineligible projects or other items. 

- Exceeding administrative fund allotment. 

- Insufficient, incomplete, or faulty project documentation. 

- Failure to provide required documentation or reports requested from ARB, DOF, 

or other agencies in a timely manner. 

- Poor performance as determined by an audit conducted by ARB, DOF, or other 

designee. 

• Remedies for non-performance include: 

- Recovery of funds. 

- Constraints on opportunity to compete for future Program funds. 

• Earned Interest—State agency agrees to maintain records and report on interest 

earned on Program funds and to expend earned interest according to the provisions 

in these Guidelines. 

• Reporting requirements—State agency is responsible for submitting semi-annual 

reports and project completion reports. 

• Ongoing evaluations and audits—State agency agrees to allow ongoing evaluations 

and audits by ARB, other State agencies, or their designated representative(s). 

• Records access requirements—State agency agrees to allow ARB or its designated 

representative(s) access to evaluate or audit records. 

• Recordkeeping requirements—State agency agrees to retain Program records for 

35 years after the bond issuance date for funds provided for the loan or loan 

guarantee program(s) or send all records to ARB within two years of the last loan 

being paid off in an electronic format to be determined by ARB. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 40 March 2010 

 Administration

• ARB’s obligations to pay any funds are contingent upon the availability of funds. In 

the event funds are not available, the State shall have no liability to pay any funds to 

the State agency or to furnish any other considerations. 

b) Scope of work provisions 

• State agency project description. 

• Project performance benchmarks—expected number of vehicles to be upgraded and 

expected emission reductions. 

• Project schedule—timeframe for completing the State agency project including major 

milestones. 

• Request for payment—steps for a State agency to request expenditure of Program 

funds. 

• The amount of Program funds awarded to the loan project. 

• Requirements for transferring funds between ARB and another State agency. 

If ARB is the administering agency for a loan project and ARB contracts with either 

another State agency or other entity, ARB will require an interagency agreement or 

contract that includes the above provisions. 

F. ARB Program Oversight 

ARB is the administering agency for this Program, and is responsible for ensuring that 

Program funds are spent on equipment projects that meet the provisions of State Law 

and these Guidelines. 

To maintain sound fiscal practices and ensure that projects can reach completion once 

begun, ARB staff shall provide a Start Letter (or multiple letters) for each grant. The 

Start Letter shall authorize the local agency (or State agency for loan projects) to 

proceed with project implementation based on a specified level of available funds. For 

a high dollar value grant, ARB staff may identify partial funding that conforms to the 

bond cash on deposit. The Start Letter shall itemize both the level of project funds and 

administration funds that are available at the request of the local agency, consistent with 

the performance benchmarks in the Guidelines and agreement. ARB may issue 

multiple Start Letters that authorize the local agency (or State agency for loan projects) 

to request additional funds, consistent with the grant or interagency agreement. 

1. ARB obligations to local or State agencies 

ARB shall obligate Program funds for each fiscal year’s appropriation according to the 

obligation deadlines set forth in State law, but consistent with the State’s fiscal policies 

for bond-funded programs. This is a two-step process, beginning with the Board’s 

allocation of funds via resolution to specific local or State agency projects and ending 

with fully executed grant agreements or interagency agreements. 

If needed, ARB staff may propose updates to the Guidelines for Board consideration 

prior to obligating funds from new appropriations. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 41 March 2010 

 Administration

2. ARB expenditures 

ARB shall liquidate Program funds for each fiscal year’s appropriation according to the 

liquidation deadlines set forth in State law but consistent with the State’s fiscal policies 

for bond-funded programs. 

• Once Program funds are obligated, with the exception of recaptured funds, any 

funds unspent by a local or State agency within the statutory timeframes revert back 

to the California Ports Infrastructure, Security, and Air Quality Improvement Account, 

and must be re-appropriated by the Legislature. It is therefore the policy of ARB to 

retain grant funds until necessary for the purchase of equipment, for the purpose of 

advancing the completion of an equipment project, for the purpose of funding a truck 

loan or loan guarantee program, or for the purpose of meeting liquidation deadlines 

set forth in State law. 

• ARB shall only expend Program funds upon receipt of a valid Grant Expenditure 

Request submitted to ARB by an authorized local or State agency representative 

acting under a fully executed agreement. 

a) Administration funds 

Administration funds expended by ARB for this Program may be used by a local agency 

for the administration of a local agency project covered by a fully executed grant 

agreement. If a local agency has more than one fully executed grant agreement with 

ARB, administration funds identified under one grant agreement may be used to assist 

in the implementation of another grant agreement. The local agency shall not use 

administration funds in excess of the total administration funds allowed under all grant 

agreements (i.e., the sum of all administration funds for one local agency shall not 

exceed 5 percent of the total project funds awarded to that local agency). 

Local agency requests for administration funds are subject to the following restrictions: 

• Local agencies with the ability to generate new funding from goods movement 

sources to cover administration funds (e.g., seaports) shall be prohibited from 

requesting administrative Program funds. 

• In all other cases, requests for administration funds are capped as follows: 

- 3% of the grant amount for locomotives, cargo equipment, and ships at berth. 

- 4% of the grant amount for harbor craft. 

- 5% of the grant amount for trucks and truck stop/distribution center electrification. 

Administration funds expended by ARB for this Program may be used by a State 

agency for the administration of a State agency truck loan project covered by a fully 

executed interagency agreement, if applicable. State agency requests for 

administration funds are capped at 5 percent of the project funding awarded to the State 

agency for truck loans and loan guarantees. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 42 March 2010 

 Administration

Administration funds shall be used for tasks associated with Program 

outreach/marketing, implementation, and audit and oversight, including: staff time; 

consultant fees; printing, mailing, and travel costs; project monitoring and compliance 

expenses; and indirect Program costs, such as general administrative services, office 

space, and telephone services. 

(1) Initial expenditure 

Consistent with the Start Letter, the local agency may request and ARB may initially 

expend administration funds for local agencies, according to the provisions for each 

source category listed in Table II.2 below, except for loan projects administered by a 

State agency. A State agency may request and ARB may approve administration funds 

up to 100 percent, consistent with the terms of the executed interagency agreement. 

The interagency agreement will include specific terms and conditions that the State 

agency must meet to request funds. 

Table II.2 Initial Expenditures for Local Agency Administration Funds 

Source Category % of Funds Requirements 

Heavy duty diesel 

trucks 

up to 90% 

Locomotives and 

rail yards 

up to 50% 

Ships at berth up to 25% 

Cargo handling 

equipment 

up to 50% 

Harbor craft up to 50% 

1. ARB and local agency have fully executed the 

grant agreement. 

2. A Start Letter authorizes the expenditure based on 

available bond cash. 

(2) Additional expenditures 

Consistent with the initial Start Letter or a subsequent Start Letter, the local agency may 

request and ARB may expend the remaining administrative funds according to the 

provisions for each source category listed in Table II.3 below. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 43 March 2010 

 Administration

Table II.3 Additional Expenditures for Local Agency Administration Funds 

Source Category % of Funds Requirements 

Heavy duty diesel 

trucks 

remaining 1. A Start Letter authorizes the expenditure based on 

available bond cash. 

2. The local agency liquidates at least 50% of the 

total project funds and ARB staff verifies that this 

condition has been satisfied. 

Locomotives and 

rail yards 

remaining 

Ships at berth remaining 

Cargo handling 

equipment 

remaining 

1. A Start Letter authorizes the expenditure based on 

available bond cash. 

2. The local agency liquidates at least 100% of the

total project funds and ARB staff verifies that this 

condition has been satisfied. 

Harbor craft remaining 1. A Start Letter authorizes the expenditure based on 

available bond cash. 

2. The local agency liquidates at least 50% of the 

total project funds and ARB staff verifies that this 

condition has been satisfied. 

b) Equipment project costs 

(1) Initial expenditure 

Consistent with the Start Letter, the local agency may request and ARB may initially 

expend Program funds for equipment projects according to the provisions for each 

source category listed in Table II.4 below, except for loan projects administered by a 

State agency. Consistent with the Start Letter, a State agency may request and ARB 

may expend Program funds for loan projects up to 100 percent once the interagency 

agreement has been executed, if applicable. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 44 March 2010 

 Administration

Table II.4 Initial Expenditures for Local Agency Equipment Project Funding

Source Category % of Funds Requirements 

Heavy duty diesel 

trucks 

up to 100% 

Locomotives and 

rail yards 

up to 10% 

Ships at berth up to 10% 

Cargo handling 

equipment 

up to 100% 

Harbor craft up to 10% 

1. A Start Letter authorizes the expenditure based on 

available bond cash. 

2. The local agency has provided data on eligible 

equipment projects to ARB. ARB staff has approved 

the competitively ranked list of projects. The local 

agency has posted the approved list on its public 

website. 

3. The approved list demonstrates a demand for the 

requested project funding. 

4. ARB staff has determined that the local agency’s

equipment project contract template, and any leaseto-own programs for trucks, meet the requirements 

of the Guidelines. 

(2) Additional expenditures 

Consistent with the initial Start Letter or a subsequent Start Letter, the local agency may 

request and ARB may expend the remaining Program funds for equipment projects 

according to the provisions for each source category listed in Table II.5 below. 

Table II.5 Additional Expenditures for Local Agency Equipment Project 

Funding 

Source Category % of Funds Requirements 

Heavy duty diesel 

trucks remaining 

Cargo handling 

equipment remaining 

1. A Start Letter authorizes the expenditure based on 

available bond cash. 

2. The approved ranked list demonstrates a demand 

for the requested project funding. 

Locomotives and 

rail yards remaining 

Ships at berth remaining 

Harbor craft remaining 

1. A Start Letter authorizes the expenditure based on 

available bond cash. 

2. The local agency has fully executed contracts for 

the equipment projects. 

3. The equipment projects are within 6 months of the 

anticipated post-inspection date. 

3. Funding recapture – ARB 

It is ARB’s policy that Program funds be obligated and expended in a timely manner. 

The ARB Executive Officer or his or her designee has the authority to recapture funds 

for reallocation and expenditure prior to reversion deadlines, and may amend or modify 

an executed grant or interagency agreement, or establish a new grant or interagency 

agreement, to implement this policy. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 45 March 2010 

 Administration

ARB may recapture and reallocate funds including, but not limited to, the following: 

• Funds allocated or paid to a local agency (or State agency administering a loan 

project) that the local (or State) agency notifies ARB are unlikely to be spent within 

the Program or statutory deadlines. 

• Funds allocated or paid to a local agency (or State agency administering a loan 

project) that ARB staff determines are unlikely to be spent within the Program or 

statutory deadlines, based on the local (or State) agency’s progress in implementing 

the grant agreement. The ARB Executive Officer shall notify the local (or State) 

agency in writing of any such determination before taking action to recapture and 

reallocate the funds. This action may include termination of a grant or interagency 

agreement, or notification that the local or State agency must return unexpended 

funds to ARB. 

• Funds returned to ARB by a local agency (or State agency administering a loan 

project). 

• Earned interest held by ARB or a local (or State) agency, as permitted by State law 

and fiscal policies. 

• Funds paid to an equipment owner but returned to the local (or State) agency after 

the funds have been liquidated. 

• Other funds that may come into the Program from other sources in the future. 

ARB staff shall follow the hierarchy below for allocating recaptured funds to Boardapproved primary or backup projects: 

• Within the same funding category and trade corridor. 

• Within the same trade corridor. 

• To another trade corridor (with Board approval). 

4. Ongoing evaluations 

ARB staff shall evaluate local agency and equipment projects on an ongoing basis. 

Evaluations are designed to meet the accountability requirements of State law and the 

Executive Order S-02-07. Any Program funds expended on equipment projects that 

ARB finds are not eligible for funding shall be documented as an adverse finding in the 

local agency’s audit. The ARB Executive Officer may require that the local agency 

reimburse ARB the Program funds identified in an adverse finding, or may seek other 

remedies from the local agency as the Executive Officer deems appropriate. 

a) Ongoing evaluations of local agency projects 

Ongoing evaluation of local agency projects includes reviewing local agency project 

records to ensure consistency with Guidelines and emission reduction goals. 

Evaluations may occur as ARB staff deems necessary and feasible with available 

resources. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 46 March 2010 

 Administration

Local agencies shall permit ARB, the DOF, the Bureau of State Audits (BSA), or any 

authorized designee, access, during normal business hours, to conduct Program and 

fiscal audits. 

b) Ongoing evaluations of equipment projects 

Ongoing evaluation of equipment projects includes reviewing equipment project records 

to ensure consistency with Guidelines and emission reduction goals, and site visits to 

inspect engines, vehicles, or other equipment funded under the Program. Evaluations 

of equipment projects may occur unannounced as ARB staff deem necessary and 

feasible with available resources. 

Equipment owners shall permit the local agency, ARB, DOF, BSA, or any authorized 

designee, access, during normal business hours, to conduct ongoing evaluations for the 

purpose of monitoring the Program. 

In addition to local agency review to ensure the appropriate registration and operation of 

bond funded equipment, ARB may periodically monitor, through federal, State, and local 

equipment registration databases, as applicable, ongoing equipment project compliance 

with California registration and operational requirements. Equipment registration 

databases may include, but are not limited to: 

• California Air Resources Board databases. 

• California Department of Motor Vehicle databases. 

- California International Registration Plan (CA IRP). 

• California Department of Fish and Wildlife databases. 

• California Department of Transportation databases.

• Local agency databases, as available, such as air district permit records or port 

access databases. 

When ARB field inspectors check trucks, locomotives, rail yards, harbor craft, cargo 

handling equipment, and ship berths for compliance with ARB regulations or 

enforceable agreements, they shall also assess compliance with Program requirements 

for any bond-funded equipment. The inspectors, via an equipment database, shall 

determine if the equipment received bond funding and evaluate bond-funded equipment 

to ensure that all pollution controls are functioning and the equipment is meeting the 

Program operating conditions. 

Nothing in these Guidelines is to be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting in any 

way ARB’s enforcement authority for ensuring that equipment subject to the Program 

complies with all Program requirements, as well as all applicable regulations or 

enforceable agreements. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 47 March 2010 

 Administration

(1) Electronic monitoring devices 

With the exception of contracts for locomotive projects and grid-based shore power 

projects, all equipment project contracts shall require that the equipment owner agree to 

the installation and use of an electronic monitoring device at any time during the 

equipment project contract term. Equipment project contracts for locomotives shall 

require equipment owners to install and use global positioning systems (GPS), and 

report data. 

ARB staff requires the use of electronic monitoring devices on bond-funded equipment 

for the locomotive and harbor craft projects that allow for 90 percent California 

operation. 

ARB staff recognizes the privacy concerns that equipment owners may have about any 

type of electronic monitoring device. ARB staff shall work with the local agencies to 

develop specifications for the minimum information needed to verify the 90 percent 

California operation. This information will be posted on ARB’s website. 

For each equipment project, all data collected from any electronic monitoring device 

required under this Program shall be provided to the local agency administering that 

equipment project and to ARB staff or its contractors for their use and analyses. Such 

data may include, but not be limited to, vehicle identification number (VIN); date, time, 

and distance traveled for each trip; GPS locational information; emissions or fuel usage 

rates; and other information collected from gauges, sensors, and other sources. 

Data collected from these monitoring devices shall be disclosed only to the local agency 

and ARB staff or its contractors, except as otherwise provided by law. Such data shall 

be provided upon request in the form and format agreed to by the parties or as 

otherwise specified in these Guidelines. Each equipment project contract shall require 

all signatories to acknowledge their understanding and agreement to allowing the local 

agency and ARB staff and its contractors such access to the collected data. Nothing in 

this provision or these Guidelines shall be construed in any way as limiting ARB's ability 

to publish or release the collected data or the results of analyses using these collected 

data in summary form without individual personal identifiers. For purposes of this 

Program, "personal identifiers" include only the name of the vehicle driver or equipment 

operator and the driver's or operator's home address in alpha-numeric format 

(e.g., 1000 Apple Way), if collected. 

5. Auditing 

Audits are designed to ensure that all local agency and equipment projects funded 

under the Program meet the requirements of these Guidelines. ARB or its designees 

shall audit a sufficient number of local agency projects and equipment projects each 

year to ensure effective Program implementation and accountability, subject to available 

resources. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 48 March 2010 

 Administration

a) ARB audits of local agency projects 

Pursuant to H&S §39625.02(e)(1), ARB staff or its designees shall conduct Program 

and fiscal audits of the local agencies. 

To ensure objectivity and the efficient use of resources, ARB shall use a risk-based 

approach to select specific local agency projects for audit during a given year. 

Consistent with this approach, local agencies demonstrating good performance when 

audited will likely be audited less frequently in the future than similarly-funded local 

agencies with poorer audit results. 

Any Program funds that local agencies expend on projects not eligible for Program 

funds shall be documented as an adverse finding in the local agency’s audit. The ARB 

Executive Officer may require that the local agency reimburse ARB the Program funds 

identified in an adverse finding, or may seek other remedies from the local agency as 

the Executive Officer deems appropriate. 

The responsibilities of ARB or its designees during an audit include, but are not limited 

to, the following: 

• Audits shall be conducted in a manner that reflects the public responsibility and 

accountability entrusted to ARB. 

• ARB shall maintain open channels of communication with the local agency under 

audit; for example, fully explaining the audit’s scope and procedure at the beginning 

of the process, informing the affected parties of potential issues as they unfold, 

affording numerous opportunities for input throughout the audit, thoroughly 

discussing any findings and recommendations during the exit interview, and allowing 

the local agency an opportunity to formally respond to the audit report. 

• To ensure objectivity and predictability, ARB shall base its findings and 

recommendations on materials such as State law, these Guidelines, Generally 

Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), e-mail communications between ARB staff 

and the local agency or equipment owner, the local agency project application, and 

any local agency’s own requirements. 

• All final audit reports, local agency or equipment owner responses, and related 

documents shall be readily available to the public.

• ARB shall conduct sufficient follow-up activities, including conducting follow-up 

reviews, to ensure that any identified deficiencies are promptly and effectively 

addressed. 

The responsibilities of a local agency during an audit shall include, but are not limited to, 

the following: 

• Ensure that Program files and other requested information are readily available to 

audit staff. 

• At a minimum, participate in the entrance and exit interviews and ensure that local 

agency or equipment owner staff is cooperative with audit staff. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 49 March 2010 

 Administration

• Communicate fully with audit staff throughout the course of an audit. 

• Make every effort, including requesting assistance from ARB if necessary, to ensure 

that identified deficiencies are promptly and effectively rectified. 

To assist ARB with the audit process, local agencies shall provide to ARB staff, upon 

request, access to documentation pertaining to the Program which includes, but is not 

limited to, the following: 

• General: 

- Organization charts. 

- Contact information for the Program and designated accounting liaisons. 

- Copies of grant agreements and any amendments between ARB and the local 

agency. 

- Copies of contracts and any amendments between the local agency and the 

equipment owner. 

- Copies of any contracts and any amendments between the local agency and 

subcontractors and consultants. 

- Reports filed with ARB, if applicable. 

• Accounting records: 

- General ledger chart of accounts. 

- Copies of the policies and procedures for: 

o Receipt and deposit of project funds. 

o Review, approval, and payment of project invoices.

o Calculation and allocation of Program administration costs. 

o Tracking and allocating interest earned on the Program. 

- Reports from the general ledger showing receipts, expenditures, interest 

earnings, and annual balances for projects and local administration during the 

audit period. 

- Copies of audit reports covering financial statements, operations, and internal 

controls during the audit period. 

- Access during fieldwork to the following accounting records: 

o Invoices/claims from the local agency to ARB for Program payments, and 

invoices from equipment owners to the local agency.

o Receipts/deposit slips showing payments received from ARB. 

o Invoices from subcontractors/consultants to the local agency or equipment 

owner. 

o Canceled checks or other expenditure documents supporting payment to the 

subcontractors/consultants. 

o Bank statements and reconciliations throughout the audit period. 

• Program records: 

- Reports that list all projects associated with the programs showing: 

o Equipment project number. 

o Subcontractor and consultant contact information. 

o Dates, check numbers, amounts, and funding sources for each equipment 

project expenditure. 

o Fiscal year of the funding appropriation for the applicable grant agreement. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 50 March 2010 

 Administration

- Copies of any and all records prepared by the local agency, the equipment 

owner, and any third parties involved in the application, review, inspection, 

scrappage, or payment steps. 

- Copies of the local agency procedures for review, approval, and submittal of 

subcontractor invoices for payment. 

- Access during fieldwork to the following Program project records: 

o Contracts between the local agency or equipment owner and the 

subcontractors/consultants. 

o Invoices from subcontractors/consultants to the local agency or equipment 

owner. 

o Requests to local agency’s accounting for payment of project invoices. 

The local agency shall retain all records subject to the recordkeeping requirements for 

local agency projects, including records to meet State and federal bond requirements. 

Retained records shall include, but are not limited to: local agency file reviews of 

annual equipment project reports, annual reports provided by equipment owners, any 

relevant project updates provided by equipment owners, documentation of equipment 

inspections, accounting records and reports for the fund accounts from which the 

proceeds were disbursed, and other relevant information. 

The local agency agrees to maintain such records as specified in the grant agreement 

to support a possible audit for 35 years after the bond issuance date and to send all 

records to ARB by the End Date of the grant agreement in an electronic format to be 

determined by ARB. 

Local agencies shall provide access to all required records and personnel with 

knowledge of such records to ARB, DOF, BSA, or any authorized designee during 

normal business hours, to conduct Program and fiscal audits. 

b) ARB audits of equipment projects 

In conjunction with local agency audits, ARB staff or an authorized designee shall also 

use a risk-based approach to select specific equipment projects. If ARB staff discovers 

non-performance issues with specific equipment projects, the local agency shall be 

notified to take appropriate action. If ARB staff discovers that the equipment project is 

not in compliance with ARB regulations, the ARB Enforcement Division shall be notified 

to take appropriate enforcement action. 

6. ARB reporting 

ARB staff shall provide regular updates and reports on the implementation status of the 

Program. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 51 March 2010 

 Administration

a) Public website 

ARB is committed to providing the public with information regarding the status of bondfunded programs. In accordance with ARB policy and Executive Order S-02-07, ARB 

shall provide periodic data updates on ARB’s Program website: 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/gmbond. At a minimum, ARB shall post: 

• ARB semi-annual reports to DOF (compiled from local agency reports). 

• Local agency project completion reports. 

• ARB annual reports. 

ARB shall also develop and maintain the Goods Movement Online Database showing 

information and progress on local agency projects, as well as individual equipment 

projects. This searchable Database will allow the public to find out about projects 

funded in a specific trade corridor, and the implementation status for each project. 

b) Annual community meetings 

In each trade corridor, ARB staff shall co-host along with the local agencies 

administering local agency projects in that corridor, at least one annual community 

meeting to provide an update on and opportunity to discuss implementation of the 

Program. 

c) Updates to the Department of Finance 

ARB shall provide semi-annual and project completion reports to the Department of 

Finance (DOF), based on the reports submitted by local agencies 

[H&S §39625.02(f)(1)-(2)]. 

d) ARB annual report 

ARB staff shall prepare an annual report on progress made to implement the Program 

[H&S §39627.5]. This report shall be submitted to the Legislature and shall include the 

following minimum elements: 

• Description of local agency projects funded by the Program, including the following 

information for each project: 

- Amount of Program funds allocated. 

- Location. 

- Implementation status. 

- The number of vehicles, pieces of equipment, ship berths, etc., expected to be 

updated. 

- Estimate of the emission reductions achieved or expected. 

- Any changes to the scope or award amounts of grant agreements. 

• Total funds allocated, obligated, and expended under the Program to date. 

• Actions undertaken to ensure local agency-funded projects are being implemented 

in a timely fashion and within the budget for Program funds. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 52 March 2010 

 Administration

7. Local agency non-performance 

Prior to implementing any of the non-performance provisions, ARB staff shall make a 

reasonable effort to work with local agency staff to address and resolve any issues 

relating to Program implementation. 

ARB staff may request a local agency to provide sufficient information to demonstrate 

what actions the agency will take to obligate and/or liquidate Program funds within the 

Program or statutory deadlines, if it appears the local agency may be unlikely to meet 

those deadlines. 

a) Non-performance finding 

If ARB staff identifies instances of local agency non-performance, ARB staff shall issue 

a written non-performance finding to that local agency. 

Local agency non-performance includes, but is not limited to, issues with any one or 

more of the following areas: 

• Misuse of Program funds. 

• Funding of ineligible equipment projects or other items. 

• Failure to comply with these Guidelines or statutes. 

• Failure to meet schedule milestones identified in the grant agreement. 

• Failure to obligate or expend Program funds within established timelines. 

• Insufficient performance or widespread deficiencies with Program oversight, 

enforcement, record keeping, contracting provisions, inspections, audit procedures, 

or any other Program element as determined by ARB staff. 

• Exceeding administrative fund allotment. 

• Insufficient, incomplete, or faulty project documentation. 

• Failure to provide required documentation or reports requested by ARB, DOF, or 

other agencies in a timely manner. 

• Poor performance as determined by an audit conducted by ARB, DOF or other 

designated agency or contractor. 

b) Local agency appeal process 

Upon notification of a non-performance finding, local agency staff or management may 

request a meeting with ARB management to dispute or discuss the validity of the nonperformance finding. If the disagreement over the validity of the non-performance 

finding cannot be resolved at the management level, local agency management may 

appeal to the ARB Executive Officer, or his or her designated representative, whose 

decision shall be final and binding. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 53 March 2010 

 Administration

c) Remedies for non-performance 

(1) Local agency probation 

ARB staff shall consider a local agency on probation at the time a non-performance 

finding is sent to the local agency. 

The local agency on probation shall develop a corrective action plan that must be 

submitted to ARB within 30 days of receipt of the written non-performance finding from 

ARB. 

ARB shall approve or disapprove with recommendations the corrective action plan 

within 30 working days of receipt from the local agency. To be considered for approval, 

the corrective action plan must include adequate, expeditious, and enforceable 

commitments to address the specific non-performance problems, including timeframes 

to complete each commitment. 

If the corrective action plan is approved, ARB staff shall evaluate the local agency’s 

performance under the approved corrective action plan, including timelines, to 

determine whether the local agency met its commitments and fully addressed the issues 

for which it was placed on probation. ARB may also impose additional requirements, 

depending upon the scope or severity of the local agency’s non-compliance with 

Program requirements. 

No later than one year from the date the local agency is originally placed on probation, 

ARB shall do one of the following, whichever ARB, in its sole discretion, deems 

appropriate: 

• Remove the local agency from probation designation. 

• Re-designate the local agency on probation for a period of up to one additional year. 

• Re-designate the local agency on probation for a period of up to one additional year, 

and require that all, or a portion of, the remaining unspent Program funds available 

for expenditure by ARB and/or the local agency plus any unspent earned interest are 

either: 

- Recaptured by ARB, or 

- Revert back to the California Ports Infrastructure, Security, and Air Quality 

Improvement Account. 

ARB may also require local agencies on probation to comply with additional 

requirements or stipulations prior to future ARB expenditures under existing grant 

agreement(s), or prior to ARB consideration of future applications from the local agency 

for Program funds. 

If the corrective action plan is disapproved by ARB with recommendations, the local 

agency shall have 30 days to revise the plan according to the recommendations, and 

resubmit it to ARB. ARB shall approve the corrective action plan as re-submitted within 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 54 March 2010 

 Administration

30 days, or develop a recommendation to require that all, or a portion of, the remaining 

Program funds available for expenditure by ARB and/or the local agency plus any 

unspent earned interest are either: 

• Recaptured by ARB, or 

• Revert back to the California Ports Infrastructure, Security, and Air Quality 

Improvement Account. 

ARB shall make information pertaining to a local agency’s probationary status available 

to the public. 

(2) Fund reversion 

Program funds automatically revert back to the California Ports Infrastructure, Security, 

and Air Quality Improvement Account under the following conditions: 

• Funds held by ARB revert if ARB does not obligate funds or liquidate funds within the 

deadlines set forth in State law. 

• Funds held by a local agency revert if the local agency does not obligate funds within 

two years of executing a grant agreement with ARB, or expend funds within four 

years of obligation. A local agency may return unused funds ahead of the reversion 

deadline if the local agency concludes it cannot spend the funds for any reason. 

• Funds held by a local agency are recaptured when the local agency withdraws from 

the Program or its grant agreement is terminated, consistent with State law, 

irrespective of whether the funds have been obligated but not yet expended. 

All Program funds that revert back to the California Ports Infrastructure, Security, and 

Air Quality Improvement Account are subject to re-appropriation by the Legislature. 

ARB and local agencies are released from funding commitments in grant agreements or 

contracts, as applicable, for any and all funds that are reverted back to the California 

Ports Infrastructure, Security, and Air Quality Improvement Account. This release does 

not apply to any contractual obligations the local agency may have with the equipment 

owner or operators. 

(3) Future grant opportunities 

A local agency’s track record in administering Program funds shall be a factor in ARB’s 

consideration of subsequent applications from that local agency for future funds. 

ARB may require local agencies with a current or prior probation designation to comply 

with additional requirements or stipulations, prior to ARB consideration of future fiscal 

year Program funds. This may include: 

• Exclusion of a local agency from participation in the Program due to past nonperformance issues. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter II. ARB Program 55 March 2010 

 Administration

• Based on the specific types and seriousness of a local agency’s past nonperformance issues, limitation(s) on future grant funding opportunities, levels, 

volume(s), or other limitation(s), as determined by ARB on a case-by-case basis. 

• The track record of the local agency may also be considered by ARB in conducting 

its audits of the local agency. 

8. State agency non-performance 

Prior to implementing any of the non-performance provisions, ARB staff shall make a 

reasonable effort to work with State agency staff to address and resolve any issues 

relating to Program implementation. 

ARB shall issue a written non-performance finding if ARB staff identifies instances of 

non-performance. 

State agency non-performance includes, but is not limited to, issues with any one or 

more of the following areas: 

• Failure to comply with these Guidelines or statutes. 

• Failure to obligate or expend Program funds within established timelines, or to show 

timely interim progress to meet these timelines. 

• Insufficient performance or widespread deficiencies with Program oversight, 

enforcement, record keeping, contracting provisions, inspections, audit procedures 

or any other Program element as determined by ARB. 

• Misuse of Program funds. 

• Funding of ineligible projects or other items. 

• Exceeding administrative fund allotment. 

• Insufficient, incomplete, or faulty project documentation. 

• Failure to provide required documentation or reports requested from ARB, DOF, or 

other agencies in a timely manner. 

• Poor performance as determined by an audit conducted by ARB, DOF, or other 

designee. 

Remedies for non-performance include: 

• Recovery of funds 

• Constraints on opportunity to compete for future Program funds. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 56 March 2010 

 Proposal

III. Local Agency Project Proposal 

Local public entities shall successfully register with ARB according to instructions 

described in the notice of funding availability (NOFA) before submitting an application 

for Program funds. 

Note: Since the applications will require a substantial investment of time by the local 

public entity, ARB staff encourages each entity to consult early with ARB staff regarding 

its ability to meet the requirements of the statute and the Guidelines to qualify as an 

applicant.

A. Local Agency Registration 

Interested local public entities shall submit registration information as required by the 

NOFA sufficient for ARB staff to assess the entity’s qualification as a local public entity, 

by the deadline identified in the NOFA. 

1. Existing or returning local agencies 

Local public entities that have successfully registered as local agencies in the Program 

for past funding cycles do not need to resubmit registration information. These 

agencies shall submit the following information: 

• Letter of intent to ARB to compete for Program funds for the funding cycle(s) 

announced in the NOFA. 

• Any appropriate updates to the agency contact information. 

• Any additional documentation requested by ARB staff. 

2. New local agency registration 

Local public entities that have not previously registered as local agencies in the 

Program shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate to ARB that they are eligible 

to apply as a local public entity. Registration information shall include, at a minimum, 

the following: 

• Type of local agency (air district, seaport, transportation agency, etc.). 

• Jurisdiction, including geographic boundaries and trade corridor. 

• Mission statement or purpose. 

• General information on the entity (total budget, overall work plan or program, etc.). 

• Legal citations and text which establishes that the local public entity has the legal 

authority to implement a regional scale incentive program for freight movement 

sources that includes: project solicitation, competition for funding, funding awards, 

execution of contracts, and equipment inspections across the entire trade corridor 

where the local public entity is based. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 57 March 2010 

 Proposal

• A description of how the local public entity is involved in freight movement or air 

quality improvements associated with goods movement, as required by the statute. 

This description shall include the entity’s specific roles, authorities, responsibilities, 

and annual budget for goods movement air quality projects. 

• A statement as to whether the local public entity fulfills the additional requirements of 

these Guidelines and further qualifies as an applicant because it: 

- Is directly responsible for operating a freight movement facility (e.g., seaport or 

airport); or 

- Has statutory authority for designing and implementing strategies and/or plans to 

reduce emissions or health risk from air pollution sources (e.g., local air pollution 

control district and air quality management district); or 

- Has statutory authority for planning and funding regional goods movement 

infrastructure projects (e.g., regional transportation planning agency). 

• Local public entity contact information. 

Local public entities shall provide any additional documentation not described above 

upon request by ARB. 

Local public entities shall successfully register with ARB staff prior to submittal of a 

project application. 

3. New State agency registration 

For the purpose of administering a loan or loan guarantee program only, any State 

agency, including ARB, is eligible to apply for Program funding. All State agencies shall 

provide the information in the NOFA to register. 

B. Legal and Program Restrictions 

In the application for funding, local agencies shall certify that the proposed local agency 

project would meet the requirements of the statute and the Guidelines. This section 

discusses the legal and Program restrictions on eligible projects. 

1. Legal restrictions 

Local agencies shall certify that the local agency project would achieve emission 

reductions not otherwise required by law or regulation [H&S §39625.5(a)(1)]. "Not 

otherwise required by law or regulation" means the emission reductions are not required 

pursuant to any local, State, or federal law, rule, or regulation; any requirements 

imposed by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); or any requirements 

imposed by a legal instrument such as a legal settlement or consent decree (collectively 

referred to as "law or regulation"). For purposes of this Program only, "not otherwise 

required by law or regulation" does not apply to any tariff, ordinance, or other 

requirement imposed by a local agency based on that local agency's authority as a 

market participant or municipal proprietor or the local agency's authority to enter into 

contracts with equipment owners and operators. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 58 March 2010 

 Proposal

The following are examples of laws or regulations that may prohibit equipment projects 

that would otherwise be eligible for funding under this Program. Sub-section (d) below 

discusses Program funding for equipment projects that may be subject to future ARB 

regulations. 

a) Environmental mitigation 

Local agencies shall not request or expend Program funds for equipment projects that 

are required as a specific California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) mitigation measure in a certified CEQA or NEPA 

document. 

b) Railroad agreements 

For locomotives, the statute specifically requires ARB to determine that the emission 

reductions that would be achieved by the locomotive equipment project are not 

necessary to satisfy any mandated emission reduction requirement under an agreement 

between a railroad company and a state or federal agency, or a local air district 

[H&S §39625.5(a)(2)(B)]. 

ARB has signed two Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with the Class I railroads – 

Union Pacific (UP) and Burlington Northern-Santa Fe (BNSF) – to reduce the emissions 

and health risks from locomotive operations. Program funding shall not be used for idle 

reduction technology on locomotives (required by the 2005 MOU) or for cleaner 

locomotives credited towards the railroads’ compliance with the 2010 fleet average 

emission standard for the South Coast Air Basin (required by the 1998 MOU). 

Locomotive repowers or replacements that go beyond the itemized requirements of 

these agreements shall be eligible for bond funding. 

c) Existing ARB regulations 

Local agencies shall not request or expend Program funds for equipment projects that 

are used to directly comply with existing regulations. The Program can co-fund eligible 

equipment subject to existing or future regulations, but only if the equipment upgrades 

are early (completed a set time prior to the compliance date) or extra (the upgrade must 

go beyond the regulatory requirements, as provided in these Guidelines). 

Existing ARB regulations that are currently in place for the following source categories 

applicable to this Program include, but are not limited to: 

• New heavy-duty diesel vehicles – Exhaust Emissions Standards and Test 

Procedures -1985 and Subsequent Model Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles (Code 

of Regulations (CCR), title 13, division 3, chapter 1 §1956.8). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 59 March 2010 

 Proposal

• In-use on-road heavy-duty trucks and buses – Regulation to Reduce Emissions of 

Diesel Particulate Matter, Oxides of Nitrogen and Other Criteria Pollutants from

In-use Heavy Duty Diesel-fueled Vehicles (CCR, title 13, chapter 1, article 4.5, 

§2025). 

• Trucks serving ports and intermodal rail yards – In-Use On-Road Diesel-Fueled 

Heavy-Duty Drayage Trucks (CCR, title 13, division 3, chapter 1, article 3 §2027). 

• Heavy-duty truck idling – Requirements to Reduce Idling Emissions from New and 

In-Use Trucks, Beginning in 2008 (CCR, title 13, division 3, §1956.8, §2404, §2424,

§2425, and §2485). 

• Truck smoke and emission control inspections – Heavy-Duty Diesel Smoke 

Emission Testing, and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Emission Control System Inspections

(CCR, title 13, division 3, chapter 3.5, §§2180-2189) and Periodic Smoke 

Inspections of Heavy-Duty Diesel Powered Vehicles (CCR, title 13, division 3, 

chapter 3.6, §§2190-2194). 

• Cargo handling equipment – Regulation for Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment at 

Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards (CCR, title 13, division 3, chapter 1 §2479). 

• Ships at berth (shore power) – Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Auxiliary Diesel

Engines Operated on Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth in a California Port (CCR, 

title 13, chapter 5.1, §2299.3 and title 17, chapter 1, subchapter 7.5, §93118.3). 

• Commercial harbor craft engines – Emission Limits and Requirements for Diesel 

Engines on Commercial Harbor Craft Operated Within California Waters and 24 

Nautical Miles of the California Baseline (CCR, title 13, chapter 5.1, §2299.5 and 

title 7, chapter 1, subchapter 7.5, §93118.5). 

Information regarding existing ARB regulations for specific source categories can be 

found on the following ARB website: http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/mobile.htm, or in the 

California Code of Regulations through the Office of Administrative Law: 

http://www.oal.ca.gov/ccr.htm. 

d) Upcoming ARB regulations 

Local agencies may request and expend Program funds for equipment upgrades that 

may be required by a future ARB regulation up until the date of Board action to adopt 

the regulation. 

As of the date of Board action, only equipment projects with executed contracts 

between the equipment owner and local agency shall be exempt from project 

completion timing requirements (e.g., specified months or years prior to the adopted 

regulatory compliance date for that equipment upgrade). 

Once the Board has taken action to approve a regulation, subsequent equipment 

projects shall be subject to the project completion timing requirements identified in the 

equipment project specifications or include emission reductions that go beyond the 

regulatory requirements. 

Information regarding upcoming ARB regulations for specific source categories can be 

found on the following ARB website: http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/mobile.htm. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 60 March 2010 

 Proposal

2. Program restrictions

The local agency shall solicit, accept applications, and fund equipment projects from all 

equipment owners who meet the eligibility requirements defined in these Guidelines, 

subject to the local agency project described in the grant agreement as well as the 

project evaluation and competitive ranking process. Notwithstanding the above, a local 

agency may exclude from funding eligibility any equipment owner who has a 

demonstrated inability to meet contractual obligations with the local agency. 

A local agency shall not propose or implement any requirements that are inconsistent 

with these Guidelines, including, but not limited to: 

• A local agency applying for Program funds cannot limit the request for funds to only 

certain project options within source and funding categories. A local agency must 

administer projects for the entire funding category in the trade corridor. 

• A local agency shall not restrict funding eligibility to a preferred individual, company, 

business entity, or other defined group of equipment owners. 

• Other than the exceptions specifically described in Chapter III.C.4., a local agency 

shall not restrict funding eligibility to equipment that operates solely or primarily 

within its jurisdictional boundaries. 

• A local agency shall not restrict equipment projects to replacement or retrofit 

equipment manufactured or sold by a specified company or companies. The local 

agency shall allow all eligible equipment projects that meet the emissions 

performance level detailed in the project specifications of these Guidelines to 

compete for Program funding. 

• A local agency shall not restrict equipment projects to equipment sold by a truck 

dealer or retrofit vender with a contract or MOU to do pre-inspections. 

• The local agency shall not propose or allow equipment projects to be completed less 

time in advance of a regulatory requirement than provided for in the project 

specification. 

• A local agency shall not impose travel restrictions on Program-funded equipment 

beyond the operating limitations defined in these Guidelines and any approved 

alternatives described in Chapter III.C.4. For example, a local agency cannot restrict 

the travel (or a portion of the travel) of trucks or line-haul locomotives to within a 

single city, county, air district, air basin, trade corridor, or similar geographic area 

that is smaller than the four trade corridors or the State of California. 

• A local agency shall not fund equipment projects failing to meet the minimum 

equipment project requirements listed in Appendices A-F. In conjunction with the 

minimum equipment project requirements, a local agency shall not fund higher 

emitting equipment, pay more per piece of equipment, modify the project life options, 

remove the project eligibility and other requirements, or relax the operating 

conditions as compared to the specifications in these Guidelines for each equipment 

project option. 

• A local agency shall not impose non-air quality requirements (like fees or employee 

drivers) on Program-funded equipment projects. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 61 March 2010 

 Proposal

C. Project Alternatives for Local Agencies

Under this Program, a “local agency project” is defined as the funding category-specific 

incentive program that the local agency proposes to implement with Program funding. 

These Guidelines limit eligibility for Program funds to equipment with recent operation in 

one or more trade corridors. Except as provided in Chapters III.B.1. and III.B.2., local 

agencies may customize their proposal(s) for each funding category, by incorporating 

any of the Program alternatives listed below, if clearly stated in the application and 

approved by ARB staff. 

ARB staff may, at its discretion, expand the following list of alternatives to include 

additional items that do not fundamentally alter the equipment project eligibility criteria, 

the equipment project requirements and operating conditions, or the effectiveness of 

those provisions in reducing emissions. 

1. Technology alternatives

The local agency must solicit, evaluate, and fund applications for all project options 

within a funding category. The local agency may propose to customize its proposal by 

incorporating any of the following approved technology alternatives: 

• A local agency may propose to offer non-Program funding for equipment that meets 

an emissions performance standard that requires lower emissions than the 

specifications in these Guidelines, provided the technology to meet that standard is 

demonstrated, verified by ARB (if applicable) and commercially available. This 

alternative is subject to the following restrictions: 

- The local agency shall not propose to offer Program funding at a level for each 

equipment project that exceeds the funding caps in these Guidelines. 

- The local agency shall not require equipment meeting lower emission standards 

than the emissions levels for the equipment project options in these Guidelines. 

- The local agency shall not propose to restrict eligibility for Program funding to 

equipment projects that utilize the additional funding to meet the lower emission 

standards (i.e., any equipment project that meets the minimum specifications 

established in these Guidelines must be eligible to compete for Program funding 

administered by the local agency for that funding category). 

For example, a local agency could propose a truck program that does not require but 

offers additional funds for replacement with natural gas; with the Program paying up 

to the maximum $60,000 per truck and the local agency providing funding from 

another, non-State source for the incremental cost of natural gas. Following ARB 

approval of the local agency project, the local agency shall solicit equipment 

applications for both the lower emission natural gas replacement approach as well 

as the truck replacement approach listed in the Guidelines. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 62 March 2010 

 Proposal

• A local agency may propose to offer non-Program funding for equipment monitoring 

or tracking devices (like global positioning systems (GPS) or radio-frequency 

identification (RFID) devices). In this case, the local agency shall commit to monitor 

the equipment for the project life. The local agency shall also make provisions 

acceptable to ARB staff for access to the data collected on individual vehicles, 

vessels or equipment and periodic data reports. 

• A local agency may propose to offer non-Program funding for efficiency upgrades, 

like aerodynamic devices on trucks. 

2. Project implementation approaches and use of contractors 

A local agency project implementation approach is defined as the mechanism(s) a local 

agency may propose to implement a local agency project. For example, as part of a 

single local agency project, a local agency may propose to directly administer grants to 

truck owners for replacement projects and to hire a contractor or other third party to run 

a truck retrofit program. Each of these is an implementation approach. 

The local agency may propose to customize its proposal by incorporating any of the 

following approved implementation approaches and use of contractors, if clearly stated 

in the application and approved by ARB staff: 

• A local agency may propose a combination of implementation approaches to target 

recruitment of eligible projects and administration of funds for selected projects. 

• The local agency may apply for Program funds to be administered in full or in part by 

a third party contractor or contractors, but shall retain full responsibility for the 

Program requirements and deadlines specified in these Guidelines and executed 

grant agreements with ARB. Any third party overhead and administration costs shall 

count against the cap established in these Guidelines for local agency administration 

funds. 

Program requirements for implementation approaches:

• Regardless of the local agency’s use of multiple implementation approaches or 

third party contractors, the competitive ranking process must take place across the 

entire funding category to ensure fair and equitable competition between eligible 

equipment projects. 

• The local agency shall not commit or obligate Program funds to specific project 

implementation approaches or third party contractors prior to the completion of the 

competitive ranking process. 

For example, as part of a single local agency project, a port may propose to employ 

three contractors to run truck replacement programs – one focused on a lease-to-own 

program for diesel trucks, one on leasing natural gas trucks, and one on offering grants 

to truck owners for the purchase of new trucks. These contractors can each market 

their project implementation approach and solicit applications for eligible truck projects, 

consistent with these Guidelines and the project grant agreement. The port must then 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 63 March 2010 

 Proposal

competitively rank the applications from all three contractors together to determine 

which specific equipment projects will be funded. The contractors can then administer 

the funding for the equipment projects selected from the competitive process. 

3. Procedure/process alternatives 

The local agency may propose to customize its proposal by incorporating any of the 

following procedure/process alternatives, if clearly stated in the application and 

approved by ARB staff: 

• A local agency can shorten the time allowed from execution of the equipment project 

contract to the project becoming operational, consistent with typical and customary 

schedules to complete such projects. 

• A local agency can expand the list of information required on an equipment project 

application or the reporting requirements for equipment options. 

• A local agency can expand the equipment inspection or scrappage requirements. 

4. Geographic operations

For clarity, this section describes both the geographic requirements that a local agency 

must implement and the specific situations where the local agency may propose to 

customize its proposal by incorporating geographic alternatives. The local agency 

application shall clearly describe, if applicable, any proposed geographic alternatives. 

ARB staff expects that local agencies will propose to administer local agency projects 

for equipment that operates in the trade corridors, including the corridor where the local 

agency has jurisdiction. 

These Guidelines limit eligibility for Program funds to equipment with recent operation in 

one or more trade corridors. Except as provided below, a local agency may not 

propose or implement a local agency project that restricts access to Program funding to 

equipment operating at a single facility or within a single city, county, air district, air 

basin, trade corridor, or similar geographic area that is smaller than the four trade 

corridors or the State of California. 

• Trucks. A local agency that applies for truck funds shall recruit eligible trucks that 

travel within the trade corridor and eligible truck stop/distribution centers within the 

trade corridor where the local agency has jurisdiction. The local agency shall accept 

applications and fund all eligible trucks that travel within the four trade corridors, 

regardless of where those trucks are based, subject to review of equipment project 

applications and the competitive ranking process. A local agency may propose to 

add an eligibility requirement that the old truck must have traveled at least 10 

percent of its annual miles within the trade corridor where the local agency has 

jurisdiction. This requirement would be added to the base Program requirements 

that the old truck traveled at least 75 percent of its annual miles within California and 

the new truck travel at least 50 percent of its annual miles within the four trade 

corridors as well as 90 percent or 100 percent of its miles in California, as 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 64 March 2010 

 Proposal

applicable. A local agency may require that truck stops and distribution centers 

eligible for funding be located within the trade corridor where the local agency has 

jurisdiction. 

• Locomotives. A local agency that applies for locomotive funds may require that both 

the old and new switcher locomotive operate full-time within the trade corridor where 

the local agency has jurisdiction, except for periodic maintenance in another region 

or neighboring state. A local agency may propose to offer an option for 90 percent 

operation in California at a reduced funding amount with the requirement for the 

installation of a global positioning system (GPS). The local agency may also require 

that both the old and new line-haul locomotive operate at least 10 percent of the time 

in the corridor where the local agency has jurisdiction, and full-time within California, 

except for periodic maintenance in a neighboring state. The local agency shall 

recruit all eligible line-haul locomotives operating in the trade corridor, regardless of 

where in California the locomotives are based. The local agency shall similarly fund 

all eligible line-haul locomotives serving that trade corridor and others, subject to 

review of equipment project applications and the competitive ranking process. A 

local agency may require that rail yards eligible for funding install a locomotive 

emissions capture and control system located in the trade corridor where the local 

agency has jurisdiction. 

• Harbor craft. A local agency that applies for harbor craft funds may propose to 

restrict eligibility to vessels that are home-ported in the trade corridor where the local 

agency has jurisdiction. A local agency may propose to offer an option for 90 

percent operation in California at a reduced funding amount with the requirement for 

the installation of a global positioning system (GPS). 

• Ships at berth. A local agency that applies for ships at berth funds may restrict 

eligibility to seaports within the trade corridor where the local agency has jurisdiction. 

• Cargo handling equipment. A local agency that applies for cargo equipment funds 

may restrict eligibility to equipment operating at ports and rail yards within the trade 

corridor where the local agency has jurisdiction. 

Note: Because seaports can apply directly to ARB, but railroads cannot, a seaport 

applying to administer projects within the combined ships at berth and cargo 

handling equipment funding category must solicit, evaluate, and fund equipment 

projects at any seaport or rail yard within the trade corridor where the local agency 

has jurisdiction. 

D. Local Agency Pre-Application Community Meeting

The local agency shall hold at least one community meeting prior to the submittal of the 

local agency project application to solicit public input on the funding categories to be 

addressed in the local agency project proposal. The local agency shall consider public 

input as it develops the local agency project application. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 65 March 2010 

 Proposal

At a minimum, the local agency project application shall identify when and where the 

community meeting(s) was held, and what methods were used to advertise the 

meeting(s). The application shall also include documentation of the attendance and the 

comments received. 

E. Local Agency Project Application

Local public entities that have successfully registered shall submit two complete local 

agency applications with an original signature by an authorized local agency 

representative for each funding category. Applications shall be submitted to ARB by 

the NOFA deadline and according to the instructions contained in the NOFA. The 

completed application shall include the following: 

• Completed application, including a written acknowledgement that ARB staff may prorate the proposed local agency project at a lower level of funding and proportionally 

lower performance measures (vehicles, equipment, harbor craft or berths to be 

updated; and the resulting emission reductions). 

• Local agency board/commission resolution (see Chapter III.E.9.). 

All application information shall be provided or the application shall be considered 

incomplete. Updates to any application information after the submittal deadline shall 

only be allowed on a case-by-case basis, at the discretion of ARB staff. 

The local agency project application shall include, at minimum, the following 

information. 

1. General information

The local agency shall include general information about the local agency consisting of, 

at minimum, the following: 

• A description of the local agency’s experience administering other incentive 

programs. If the local agency has implemented more than one type of incentive 

program, describe the program that is most similar to the project proposal first; then 

any other incentive programs. At minimum, the description of prior experience shall 

include: 

- Purpose of the incentive program (equipment upgrades, new technologies, etc.). 

- How long the local agency has administered the program. 

- Annual funding amounts. 

- General description and quantification of the equipment purchased through the 

program. 

- Successful outreach strategies used to solicit participation. 

- Overview of the monitoring and reporting under the program. 

• Staff contact information. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 66 March 2010 

 Proposal

The State agency shall include general information about the State agency consisting 

of, at minimum, the following: 

• Type of State agency (environmental, finance, business, transportation, etc.). 

• Mission statement or purpose. 

• General information on the entity (type of programs and budget). 

• A description of how the State agency is involved in providing financial assistance, 

such as grants or loan or loan guarantee programs. This description shall include 

the agency’s specific roles, authorities, responsibilities, and annual budget for these 

programs. 

• State agency contact information. 

2. Project proposal 

The local or State agency shall provide the following information about the agency’s 

proposed project. The local or State agency shall at a minimum: 

• Identify the trade corridor(s) targeted. 

• Identify the funding category(s). 

• Identify any proposed project implementation approaches. 

• Identify and detail any proposals to allow lease-to-own programs. 

• Identify any proposed project alternatives consistent with Chapter III.C. 

• Describe the air quality problems and key contributing pollutants in the trade 

corridor. 

• Describe how the project is consistent with local and regional plans to reduce 

emissions from goods movement activities, or consistent with the regional strategies 

in ARB’s 2006 Emission Reduction Plan for Ports and Goods Movement in California

or the State Implementation Plan. At minimum, this description shall include the 

strategies or measures identified in these goods movement plans that are addressed 

by the local agency project proposal. 

• Other related information requested by ARB staff. 

3. Provisions to customize proposal 

The agency application shall clearly indicate, for each funding category, if the agency is 

proposing to customize its proposal by incorporating any of the approved Program 

options described in Chapter III.C.: 

• Technology alternatives. 

• Project implementation approaches and use of contractors. 

• Procedure/process alternatives. 

• Geographic operations. 

The application shall describe the reasons for each alternative proposed. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 67 March 2010 

 Proposal

4. Funding demonstration

The local or State agency shall include a funding demonstration for each project. 

Elements of funding demonstration. This funding demonstration shall include, but is not 

limited to: 

• Documentation of the local or State agency’s fiscal ability to implement the proposed 

local agency project. 

• A copy of the local agency’s most recent final fiscal audit. 

a) Program funds requested

• The total cost of the project, including the estimated per unit cost for new equipment. 

For grid-based shore power projects and harbor craft projects, the local agency may 

estimate the total cost of the project in the anticipated completion year. 

• The amount of Program funds requested from ARB, including the breakdown of 

equipment project funds and administration funds, subject to the limits in these 

Guidelines. 

b) Match funding requirements

The local or State agency shall identify all non-Program match funding and provide the 

following minimum documentation: 

• The specific sources of the matching funds, including private, federal, local, 

applicable other State, and non-applicable other State (see Chapter IV.A.6. 

regarding which types of other State funding are applicable for purposes of 

calculating the cost-effectiveness under this Program). If a local air district proposes 

to co-fund projects with the monies derived from the $2 surcharge on vehicle 

registration fees authorized by AB 923 (Chapter 707, Statutes of 2004), these 

monies must be identified as applicable other State funds in this demonstration. 

• For each source of match funding: 

- Name of the program. 

- The amount. 

- Any conditions or restrictions associated with its use. 

- Any timeframe requirements associated with its expenditure. 

• A demonstration that all non-Program match funds are reasonably available within 

the timeframes of the project schedule. 

If a local agency wishes ARB to consider the availability of non-private match funds as a 

supporting factor in its allocation and award of Program grants, the local agency must 

submit the following additional documentation: 

• For each entity identified as a source of matching funds, attach the entity’s approved 

governing board or commission resolution (if a public agency) or a letter signed by 

an authorized representative (if a federal agency), stating: 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 68 March 2010 

 Proposal

- A commitment from the entity to provide such funds for the stated purpose, 

including the amount, any conditions and restrictions associated with their use, 

and any timeframe requirements associated with their expenditure. 

ARB staff may, on a case-by-case basis, allow the written commitment to be submitted 

up to 20 calendar days after the application deadline. 

5. Air quality benefits

The local agency shall use the Goods Movement Online Database to quantify the 

emission reductions and cost-effectiveness of a proposed local agency project. The 

local agency shall enter the required funding and project information into the Database. 

Based on that information, the Database will calculate the estimated air quality benefits 

and cost-effectiveness for the local agency project. 

If a local agency identifies an eligible project that cannot be quantified with the 

Database for that funding category, the local agency should contact ARB staff for 

guidance. Any State agency applying for funds to administer a loan or loan guarantee 

program should contact ARB staff for assistance to determine the benefits and costeffectiveness. 

6. Staff resources

The local agency application shall identify and describe the staff resources necessary to 

effectively implement the local agency project proposal. This includes documentation of 

existing and planned staffing, with an indication of when planned staff will be hired. 

The local agency shall affirmatively demonstrate that the agency has or will have the 

necessary resources in place to meet the demands of the project(s) type and scope. 

The staff demonstration shall be based, if applicable, on the local agency’s prior 

experience implementing incentive programs that are similar to the funding category in 

the proposal. A local agency without prior experience implementing incentive programs 

for the proposed funding category should contact ARB or a local agency in the region to 

obtain assistance with assessing the staff resources the agency will need to meet the 

demands of the project(s). 

The local agency shall provide documentation regarding the relationship between the 

number of pieces of equipment that can be upgraded in a given timeframe and the 

number of Program staff needed to accomplish those upgrades. The information shall 

include, but is not limited to, the following (based on experience): 

• Purpose of the prior incentive program(s). 

• Time administering the prior program(s). 

• Total incentive funds administered by the local agency under the prior program(s) in 

the last 2 years. 

• Total pieces of equipment contracted under the prior program(s) in the last 2 years. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 69 March 2010 

 Proposal

• Total staff positions (in equivalent PYs) assigned to implement incentive funds under 

the prior program(s) in the last 2 years. 

• Plans to hire or contract additional staff to implement funding requested. 

• List of staff classifications, in equivalent PYs, that are available or will be available to 

implement the project, including: 

- Program staff (marketing/outreach, grants, contracts, inspections, audits, etc.). 

- Managerial staff. 

- Administrative support staff. 

- Fiscal and accounting staff. 

7. Project schedule 

At a minimum, the local agency project schedule shall provide the approximate number 

of weeks necessary to accomplish each of the milestones identified below (following the 

execution of grant agreements and the receipt of the project Start Letter from ARB). 

• Equipment project solicitation period, including marketing/outreach. 

• Equipment project application review period. 

• Competitive ranking and selection of equipment projects and webposting. 

• Equipment owner notification period. 

• Equipment pre-inspection period. 

• Contract signature period. 

• Equipment post-inspection period. 

• Liquidation period. 

The State agency project schedule shall identify the key milestones and the 

approximate number of weeks necessary to accomplish each of the milestones, 

following the execution of an interagency agreement (where applicable) and notification 

from ARB that there is bond funding available to begin the project. 

8. Certification to comply with Program requirements

The local agency shall include a certification that it has the ability and intent to fully and 

effectively satisfy each of the local agency project implementation requirements detailed 

in these Guidelines including, but not limited to, those listed below. Local agencies 

currently administering incentive programs similar to this Program may use existing 

policies and procedures that are modified to reflect the unique requirements of this 

Program. 

• Support public participation. 

• Conduct marketing and solicit equipment project applications (including targeted 

outreach and assistance to independent truck owner-operators). 

• Review and competitively rank project applications (including web posting). 

• Select equipment projects for funding, including any local board/commission 

approval process. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 70 March 2010 

 Proposal

• Conduct equipment pre-inspections and compliance checks. 

• Notify equipment owners of the status of their application. 

• Execute equipment project contracts. 

• Ensure equipment scrappage where required. 

• Conduct post-inspections of new or upgraded equipment. 

• Request expenditures from ARB. 

• Process invoices and requests from equipment owners for payment (including direct 

payments to vendors and reimbursements). 

• Calculate and report earned interest. 

• Evaluate equipment projects and assess on-going compliance with contract 

conditions. 

• Provide required reports to ARB (including the ability to submit equipment project 

data electronically when requested). 

• Participate in Program and fiscal audits. 

A State agency shall include a certification that will comply with all requirements that are 

applicable to loan or loan guarantee projects. State agencies shall also include a 

description of proposed actions to evaluate loan and loan guarantee projects on an 

ongoing basis to meet the accountability requirements of SB 88 and the Governor’s 

Executive Order S-02-07. 

9. Local agency board/commission resolutions

The local agency shall provide ARB with a resolution of the local agency governing 

board or commission that authorizes the local agency to enter into a grant agreement 

with ARB, accept funds, and provide any matching funds under the fiduciary control of 

the local agency that are identified in the local agency project funding demonstration. 

The local agency resolution shall also clearly identify the local agency’s 

board/commission role or board/commission delegations to local agency staff for the 

following: 

• The local agency representative authorized to sign and submit the local agency 

project application. 

• The local agency representative authorized to sign/execute a grant agreement 

between ARB and the local agency. 

• The approval of a competitively ranked equipment project list indicated the 

equipment projects selected for funding and a backup list of eligible equipment 

projects. 

• The local agency representative authorized to sign/execute an equipment project 

contract between the local agency and equipment owner. 

• The local agency representative authorized to sign Grant Expenditure Requests and 

delegate signature authorization to others. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter III. Local Agency Project 71 March 2010 

 Proposal

The local agency resolution shall also identify all sources and amounts of non-private 

matching funds committed to Program projects, and shall state any conditions and time 

constraints associated with those funds. 

ARB staff may, on a case-by-case basis, allow a local agency to submit its approved 

resolution up to 20 calendar days after the application deadline. 

For loan projects, if required by the State agency that is accepting the funds, the State 

agency will provide ARB with a resolution or similar document that authorizes the State 

agency to enter into an interagency agreement with ARB and accept funds. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 72 March 2010 

 Implementation

IV. Local Agency Project Implementation

A. Project Implementation Requirements 

1. Community and public participation 

a) Public participation 

The local agency shall identify and implement mechanisms for the public to provide 

input to the local agency on the equipment project solicitations, the competitively ranked 

list of equipment projects, the periodic progress reports, and the equipment project 

status updates on the ARB website (and the local agency website, if applicable). 

The local agency shall also commit to co-hosting with ARB staff at least one community 

meeting in the trade corridor each year to provide updates on the implementation of the 

local agency project. 

b) Public website 

The local agency shall maintain a Program website available to the public. Prior to the 

first solicitation for projects, the local agency shall include an easily identifiable Program 

hyperlink visible and active directly from the agency’s main webpage (or the main page 

for incentive programs). The website shall contain, at a minimum, the following 

information: 

• Local agency contact information. 

• A link to ARB’s Program website (http://www.arb.ca.gov/gmbond). 

• Information pertaining to equipment project solicitations. 

• The competitively ranked equipment project list(s), when available. 

To enhance outreach efforts and Program transparency, the local agency shall submit a 

website link to ARB containing specific local agency program information, including 

information on community meetings or public workshop announcements which will then 

be posted on ARB’s Program website. 

2. Equipment project marketing tools 

The local agency shall use marketing strategies that specifically target the owners of 

Program-eligible equipment covered by the local agency project, and operating in the 

trade corridor, regardless of where that equipment is based. 

Local agencies shall provide technical and administrative assistance to equipment 

project applicants to help them understand and apply for equipment projects. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 73 March 2010 

 Implementation

a) Marketing tools

Local agencies shall advertise the Program to a broad and diverse audience. The local 

agency’s strategies should include some of the marketing tools below: 

• Develop and maintain list of interested parties. 

• Use web-based marketing. 

• Advertise and post announcements in local newspaper(s) and trade journals, 

including non-English publications. 

• Use radio advertisements. 

• Issue public notices. 

• Distribute brochures/fact sheets/community newsletters. 

• Partner with trade associations, dealerships, truck stops, ports, and railroads. 

• Hold outreach events at locations where targeted audience(s) typically congregate. 

• Use direct mail campaign(s). 

b) Outreach to independent truck owner/operators

For truck programs, the local agency shall design and implement a targeted outreach 

program for independent owner/operators to inform them about Program funding 

opportunities and to assist them in completing equipment project applications. The local 

agency should hold some outreach events outside of normal working hours to allow 

more independent owner operators to attend. 

The outreach information shall include, at a minimum, the Program funding available, 

equipment and operating requirements, and application deadlines. Marketing tools to 

reach this audience may include, but are not limited to: 

• Education and application assistance via a kiosk set up near a location where 

independent truck drivers congregate. 

• A toll free number for equipment project applicants to check the status of applications 

or get phone assistance in completing an application, including access in languages 

other than English. 

• A notice in local papers or other written material of funding availability (including 

papers published in languages other than English). 

c) Information on truck efficiency upgrades 

For truck programs, the local agency shall make information available to equipment 

owners regarding upgrades to improve fuel efficiency, especially for long-haul trucks. 

Technologies that improve fuel efficiency for trucks may include devices that reduce 

aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance. Aerodynamic drag may be reduced using 

devices such as cab roof fairings, cab side gap fairings, cab side skirts, and on the 

trailer side, trailer side skirts, gap fairings, and trailer tail. Rolling resistance may be 

reduced using single wide tires or low-rolling resistance tires and automatic tire inflation 

systems on both the tractor and the trailer. These upgrades offer the potential to cut 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 74 March 2010 

 Implementation

emissions of greenhouse gases and criteria pollutants, with a two to three year payback 

period through lower fuel costs. The benefits are variable based on the type of truck 

operations. 

On December 11, 2008, ARB adopted a Regulation To Reduce Greenhouse Gas 

Emissions From Heavy-Duty Vehicles (CCR, title 17, section 95300). The regulation 

applies primarily to owners of 53-foot or longer box-type trailers requiring their trucks 

and trailers to become more fuel efficient. Truck owners may be responsible for 

replacing or retrofitting their affected vehicles with efficiency upgrades that fit their 

operating profile. While this Program does not provide funding for the efficiency 

upgrades, other incentive programs may help offset the purchase cost or help finance 

the purchase of the upgrades, including ARB’s Providing Loan Assistance for California 

Equipment (PLACE) Program (http://www.arb.ca.gov/ba/loan/on-road/on-road.htm). 

d) Outreach to small businesses for infrastructure construction

AB 761 (Chapter 611, Statutes of 2007) imposes requirements on State agencies 

awarding bond-funded contracts to encourage the participation of small businesses in 

the construction of the State’s infrastructure. Government Code Section 14838.1. 

Under SB 88, ARB cannot directly award contracts to build infrastructure under the 

Program and is therefore not subject to the requirements of AB 761. However, ARB 

can impose requirements to meet the spirit of the law when it provides funds via grant 

agreements to local agencies to build the electric infrastructure to support both gridbased shore power for ships at berth and electric truck pedestals at truck stops or 

distribution centers. 

For grid-based shore power and truck stop/distribution center electrification projects, the 

local agency shall design and implement a targeted outreach program to encourage 

small businesses to participate in the construction, alteration, demolition, repair, or 

improvement of the project infrastructure funded by the bond Program. Outreach shall 

include advertising opportunities to bid for projects (as applicable), providing the bidding 

procedures, and providing California small businesses with information on available 

training and technical assistance for understanding and bidding on contracts. 

A local agency that receives funding for these equipment project types shall keep 

statistics on small business and microbusiness participation in any contracts for this 

equipment installation. The local agency shall include these statistics in project data 

updates and reports to ARB. 

3. Local agency solicitation of equipment projects 

A local agency must solicit applications for equipment, evaluate, and fund eligible 

applications for all project options within the funding category, and base project 

selection on the competitive ranking process. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 75 March 2010 

 Implementation

A local agency may conduct more than one solicitation for each Program grant. If 

multiple solicitations are conducted, the subsequent solicitation shall not occur before 

the prior one is closed, unless the demand for funds is less than the amount available 

and the local agency obtains approval from ARB staff. 

• Prior to opening a solicitation period, the local agency must submit the proposed 

equipment application form(s), program announcement(s), and information packet(s) 

to ARB staff for review and approval. ARB staff shall have a maximum of 8 business 

days to identify any necessary revisions, or the solicitation package shall be 

considered approved. 

The documentation on the solicitation process shall include, but is not limited to, the 

following: 

• Start and end dates for the equipment project application period. 

• A list of materials in the information packet (see below). 

• A solicitation schedule with milestones. 

As part of the program announcement, the local agency shall make an information 

packet available to equipment owners who may be interested in applying for funding. 

This packet shall include the equipment project application, plus materials that describe 

all of the following: 

• Application submittal information (how, where, by when, to whom). 

• The Program and purpose for the solicitation. 

• The equipment eligible for Program funding, including equipment project 

requirements and conditions (e.g., equipment inspections and any associated 

requirement for the equipment owner to bring equipment to a designated location, 

California operation, scrappage of old equipment, legally binding contract and 

contract terms, etc.). 

• Information on what owners must do to maintain eligibility throughout the funding 

process. 

• The application forms (all required information specified in the appropriate 

Appendix). 

• Limits on available funding per piece of equipment. 

• Equipment application disclosure language, and a clear statement that new 

equipment funded by this Program can only be purchased or ordered once the 

existing equipment has been pre-inspected and the contract is signed between the 

equipment owner and local agency. Locomotives may be pre-ordered prior to the 

execution of a contract. 

• The equipment project evaluation and competitive ranking process. The local 

agency must inform equipment owners that they may request a reduced funding 

amount to improve the cost-effectiveness and competitiveness. 

• The payment process, including invoice payments and direct payments to vendors 

(as applicable). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 76 March 2010 

 Implementation

• Remedies for contract non-performance. 

• The reporting requirements. 

• The ongoing equipment evaluation and auditing process. 

4. Requirements for equipment projects where the local agency 

is also the equipment owner 

For certain types of equipment projects, the local agency administering the grant from 

ARB may also be the owner of the equipment that is competing for funding to upgrade. 

For example, a port may be acting as a local agency under this Program and seeking 

funding as the equipment owner to install a grid-based shore power project. Any local 

agencies awarded grants from ARB that also want to be the equipment owner recipient 

of the funding shall comply with the additional requirements listed below, and any 

supplemental requirements identified by ARB staff, to reduce the inherent conflict of 

interest: 

• Prior to opening a solicitation period, the local agency must submit to ARB staff (for 

review and approval) the proposed equipment application form(s), the 

solicitation/program announcement(s) and information packet(s) for applicants. 

• Solicitation must require that the applications be sent in a sealed envelope. 

• Sealed applications must be opened with ARB staff and the local agency present. 

• Ranked list must be developed and approved in conjunction with ARB staff. 

• The local agency must sign a contract with ARB to receive authorization to use 

those funds (this contract is in addition to the grant agreement that covers the local 

agency’s grant administration responsibilities). 

5. Evaluation and Database entry of equipment project 

applications 

The local agency shall review equipment project applications for eligibility and content, 

including whether an application is submitted in good faith, credible, and in compliance 

with these Guidelines. 

a) Review of equipment project applications 

At a minimum, the local agency review of equipment project applications shall include: 

• Verification that the equipment and owner are eligible to participate in the Program. 

• Verification that the proposed equipment project is consistent with these Guidelines. 

• Determination that all data and information necessary to calculate benefits and costs 

consistent with approved ARB methods are included. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 77 March 2010 

 Implementation

b) Database entry of equipment project applications

After the initial review of the equipment project applications, the local agency shall enter 

eligible equipment project applications into the Goods Movement Online Database. The 

Database shall aid the local agency and ARB in reviewing, ranking, and tracking 

equipment projects. 

6. Match funding for equipment projects 

a) Carl Moyer program

Local air districts cannot combine funding from this Program and direct funding from the 

Carl Moyer program on the same equipment project (i.e., funds directly authorized 

under H&S §44091.1(a) and Public Resources Code §42889). 

In response to air district requests, ARB staff has evaluated whether some “passthrough” vehicle registration fees that can be used in the Carl Moyer program may also 

be used for match funding under this Program. Under AB 923 (Chapter 707, 

Statutes of 2004), the $2 surcharge on the vehicle registration fee can be used for 

match funding of Proposition 1B projects, consistent with state law. 

Program funds and the $2 surcharge may be combined on the same equipment project 

if all of the following conditions are met: (a) the equipment project meets both bond 

Program eligibility requirements and Carl Moyer program funding criteria; (b) the 

equipment project does not exceed the Carl Moyer program cost-effectiveness limit, 

with the project cost including both Program and AB 923 funds; and (c) the $2 

surcharge funds are not counted as part of an air district’s Carl Moyer program match 

requirement. 

For the purpose of competitively ranking local agency and equipment projects under this 

Program, the calculation of reductions per State dollar invested must treat both bond 

Program monies and the $2 surcharge monies as applicable State funds since the 

surcharge monies would otherwise be used in the Carl Moyer program. 

b) Motor vehicle registration fees (AB 2766)

Assembly Bill 2766 (AB 2766) (Motor vehicle registration fees; Chapter 1705, Statutes 

of 1990) provides for the collection of an additional $4 in motor vehicle registration fees 

to fund various air pollution efforts. For the purpose of this Program, AB 2766 funds can 

be used for match funding of Program projects and are not considered State funds. 

c) Match funding from greenhouse gas reduction incentives, 

including AB 118

SB 88 directs ARB to consider projects that cut greenhouse gas emissions to support 

the State’s greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. To encourage greater State 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 78 March 2010 

 Implementation

funding for projects with significant greenhouse gas reductions, local agencies and 

equipment owners can supplement Program funds with monies from other State 

sources intended to reduce greenhouse gases, including (but not limited to) the AB 118 

Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program administered by the 

California Energy Commission. Provided that toxic and criteria pollutant emission 

reductions are only credited to the Proposition 1B Program (not the other State funding 

source), such monies shall be excluded from the total applicable State funds used to 

determine the cost-effectiveness of a proposed project under this Program. Since 

reductions in greenhouse gases are not quantified as part of the benefit side of the costeffectiveness calculation, State incentives to cut greenhouse gases can similarly be 

excluded from the cost side of this calculation. 

7. Competitive ranking and selection of equipment projects 

Local agencies shall enter equipment project application information into the Goods 

Movement Online Database to create a competitively ranked list of eligible equipment 

projects. This process will be applied to competing equipment projects under each 

solicitation and grant agreement. Should the Database not be available, the local 

agency shall create a competitively ranked list on an Excel spreadsheet using a 

template provided by ARB staff. 

The following procedures for local agencies to rank and select equipment projects are 

based on the quantitative process ARB will use to competitively rank and select local 

agency projects. Chapter II.E.6. provides additional explanation of the elements of this 

process and Figure II.1 illustrates how the competitive process works. 

The competitive ranking shall be quantitative based on multiple factors – emission 

reductions and a measure of cost-effectiveness that considers match funding. The 

calculation of emission reductions uses the Carl Moyer program protocol of weighting 

combustion PM emissions (essentially diesel PM) by a factor of 20 relative to other 

pollutants to account for the greater health impacts of PM per ton of emissions. This 

protocol helps target Program funding to the projects that will achieve the greatest 

reduction in health risk. 

The local agency shall publish the ARB-approved list of competitively ranked projects 

on the agency’s website and provide a link to ARB’s Program website. 

a) Emission reduction score 

For each equipment project within a funding category, the local agency shall use the 

Goods Movement Online Database, or alternate means provided by ARB, to calculate 

the total pollutant-weighted emission reductions in California, over the project life. 

Emission reductions = Reduction in NOx + (combustion PM x 20) emissions in 

California over the project life in pounds 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 79 March 2010 

 Implementation

The local agency shall list all equipment projects within the same funding category and 

eligible under the same local agency project grant agreement, in descending order of 

emission reductions, with the greatest emission reductions on top and the lowest 

emission reductions on the bottom. The agency shall number or score each project 

starting at the bottom with a score of 1 and continuing consecutively to the top project. 

For example, if there are 8 project proposals, the one with the greatest emission 

reductions would receive a score of 8. 

Emission Reduction Score = number from above evaluation 

b) Cost-effectiveness score 

For each equipment project within a funding category, the local agency staff shall use 

the Database, or alternate means provided by ARB, to calculate total pollutant-weighted 

emission reductions in pounds (as determined above), divided by the total applicable 

State funding proposed for the project. Total applicable State funding includes 

requested Program funds specific to that equipment project, plus any other State 

dollars, as applicable (see Chapter IV.A.6.). 

Cost-effectiveness = weighted emission reductions (lbs)/total State $ 

The local agency shall list all equipment projects within the same funding category and 

eligible under the same local agency project grant agreement, in descending order of 

emission reductions per State dollar, with the highest number on top and the lowest 

number on the bottom. The local agency shall number or score each project starting at 

the bottom with a score of 1 and continuing consecutively to the top project. For 

example, with 8 equipment project proposals, the one with the greatest emission 

reductions per State dollar would receive a score of 8. 

Cost-Effectiveness Score = number in above evaluation 

c) Competitive ranking 

The local agency shall add the Emission Reduction Score to the Cost-Effectiveness and 

Match Score to determine the final points for each equipment project. The agency shall 

rank equipment projects within the funding category covered by the grant agreement 

from highest points to lowest points to create the competitive ranking list. 

Note: eligible projects to upgrade switcher locomotives shall automatically be ranked 

above other types of competing locomotive equipment project options, consistent with 

the statutory direction to give funding priority to switchers. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 80 March 2010 

 Implementation

d) Ranked list approval process 

The local agency must submit ranked lists to ARB staff for approval prior to selecting 

projects for funding or requesting project funds from ARB. The process for generating 

an approval of a ranked list is described below and may be revised by ARB staff as 

needed and posted on the Program website. 

• A local agency enters equipment project application information into the Database to 

create a preliminary competitively ranked list of eligible equipment projects. The 

local agency may also submit the information via an Excel spreadsheet which will be 

imported into the Database. 

• The local agency must submit to ARB for approval its internal verification process. 

• After the local agency has completed its internal review of the submitted data and 

the preliminary ranked list, the agency notifies ARB staff (by e-mail) that the ranked 

list is ready for approval. ARB staff reviews the ranked list and if needed, requests 

additional clarification, corrections, and/or documentation to ensure information in 

the Database is credible. ARB staff identifies any issues with the ranked list via 

email to the local agency. 

• ARB staff notifies the local agency when the ranked list has been approved and is 

available to be posted on the local agency’s website. 

e) Selection of projects for funding

The local agency shall use the ARB approved ranked list to select projects for funding. 

The local agency shall apply the available grant dollars (minus allowed administration 

funding) to the list of competitively ranked equipment projects within the funding 

category. The local agency shall award grant funds to the top project and continue 

down the competitive ranking list until the grant funds are exhausted. Projects with an 

increase in emissions or negative cost-effectiveness are not eligible for funding. ARB 

staff may identify a minimum cost-effectiveness to ensure that Program monies achieve 

the intended benefits. Any minimum cost-effectiveness requirement not currently 

included in the Guidelines will be posted on the Program website. 

The local agency shall maintain an equipment project backup list comprised of the 

projects on the competitive ranking list that did not receive funding. Equipment projects 

on this backup list are available for Program funding, in the order established on the 

competitive ranking list, if additional funds become available. Funds may become 

available when an equipment project selected for funding does not pass the preinspection, when an equipment owner voluntarily withdraws from the Program prior to 

execution of an equipment project contract, or for other reasons. 

As funding becomes available, local agency staff shall make a reasonable effort to 

contact the equipment owner with the top unfunded equipment project on the 

competitive ranking list to: (a) determine if the owner is still interested in participating in 

the Program; and (b) obtain an updated signed equipment project application disclosure 

statement to verify that the equipment owner has not applied for Program funds 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 81 March 2010 

 Implementation

elsewhere. If the local agency is unable to proceed with the top equipment project after 

a reasonable effort, the local agency may proceed with the next equipment project on 

the competitively ranked list. 

8. Compliance check 

The local agency shall conduct a compliance check on the old vehicle and the 

equipment owner for all truck replacement, repower, or retrofit projects proposed for 

funding prior to executing an equipment project contract to ensure both the equipment 

and owner do not have any outstanding air pollution-related equipment violations. To 

submit the compliance check, the local agency shall enter the following required 

information for each truck into the Goods Movement Online Database: 

• Registered equipment owner name. 

• Vehicle identification number (VIN). 

• Vehicle license plate number. 

The local agency may also enter the following optional information into the Database: 

• California Highway Patrol number (CA Number). 

• U.S. Department of Transportation number. 

• Interstate Commerce Commission number. 

Due to the large number of vehicles that could require compliance checks, local 

agencies are encouraged to submit these data as soon as possible after receipt of the 

application. 

ARB Program staff shall work with ARB’s Enforcement Division staff to obtain the 

information and display the results of the compliance check in the Database. ARB staff 

will endeavor to provide the results to the local agency within 10 working days. The 

turnaround time may increase depending upon work volume and available ARB staff 

resources. 

For FY2007-08 Program funds, if the compliance check indicates there is an 

outstanding violation prior to the application date, the equipment project application 

shall be disqualified unless the violation is for an engine label. The local agency shall 

inform the equipment owner in writing that the equipment project application has been 

disqualified for funding, and that the owner must correct the violation and pay any 

applicable fines. 

For other Program funds, if the compliance check indicates there is an outstanding 

violation on any vehicle within an owner’s fleet, the local agency may offer all affected 

equipment owners the opportunity to retain grant eligibility by correcting the violation 

and paying any fines prior to execution of the contract(s) between the local agency and 

equipment owner. If the local agency has notified the equipment owner of the violation, 

and the equipment owner does not correct the violation and pay applicable fines in a 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 82 March 2010 

 Implementation

timely manner, the local agency shall inform the equipment owner in writing that the 

equipment project application has been disqualified for funding. 

9. Notifications to equipment owners 

The local agency shall notify equipment project applicants of the status of their 

applications. Notifications shall be in writing, and occur within a reasonable time after 

the end of the solicitation period. 

At a minimum, written notifications shall include the following: 

• A clear statement whether or not the equipment project is eligible for Program funds. 

• If the equipment project is eligible, the notification shall include a clear statement 

indicating whether the equipment project was selected for funding or placed on the 

backup list. 

• If the equipment project is selected for funding, the notification shall include: 

- Total Program funding amount for equipment project. 

- Information and deadlines for scheduling a pre-inspection. 

- Language indicating Program funding is contingent on passing the equipment 

pre-inspection. 

- Information regarding what the equipment owner must do to maintain eligibility. 

- Information and deadlines for executing equipment project contracts, applying for 

direct payments to vendors (if applicable), post-inspection requirements, 

deadlines to complete the project, and the process for obtaining Program funds 

through invoice payments. 

• If the equipment project is placed on the backup list, the notification shall include 

information pertaining to the potential for future funding of the equipment project. 

• If the equipment project is not being considered for Program funding, the notification 

shall include information about the equipment owner’s ability to apply for other 

incentive funding opportunities, and the ability to participate in Program funding in 

future years. 

10. Equipment project pre-inspections 

• The local agency shall conduct and document equipment project pre-inspections 

after the local agency has identified equipment projects for funding under this 

Program. Pre-inspections at the local agency’s option may occur prior to or after the 

execution of an equipment project contract and must be conducted by local agency 

equipment inspectors or their designated contractors which may include truck 

dealerships. The local agency shall initiate and maintain a contract or MOU with any 

truck dealership pre-inspecting equipment to ensure Program pre-inspection 

requirements are met. A local agency shall not restrict equipment projects to 

equipment sold by a truck dealer or retrofit vender with a contractor MOU to do preinspections. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 83 March 2010 

 Implementation

Pre-inspection information and results shall be entered into the Goods Movement 

Online Database. 

The pre-inspection for each source category shall, at a minimum, include: 

• Collection of the owner’s name, address, and telephone number. 

• Identification of the location of the engine (business, ship berth, or truck facility). 

• Collection of the serial number of the baseline engine and any additional information 

necessary to assist in the verification of the baseline engine application information. 

For engines without a visible and legible serial number, the local agency inspector 

must stamp or tag the engine block with the Program equipment project number. 

• Collection of baseline information on ship activity at the berth, or truck activity at the 

truck stop or distribution center. 

• Photographic, digital documentation for the project file of each piece of equipment 

being pre-inspected. The photographic documentation shall include: 

- The serial number of the engine (if legible) or Program equipment project 

number. 

- License plates or other distinguishing identification that is visible on the 

equipment. 

- A photograph that captures a full view of the equipment being inspected (e.g., the 

entire truck, vessel, locomotive, etc.). 

• Description of the local agency’s method for cataloging, referencing, storing, and 

easily retrieving project-specific photos. 

• Verification by meter reading of the equipment usage (hours or miles), and that the 

usage reported in the equipment project application is reasonable given the usage 

meter reading. 

• Verification that the engine is operational (with a start-up) and is working as 

described in the equipment project application (document function and use). 

• Verification that engines subject to the software upgrades for diesel truck retrofit 

projects (i.e., chip reflash) have completed the upgrade. 

11. Equipment project contracts 

The local agency shall obligate funds for each equipment project as described in these 

Guidelines. These funding commitments shall become legally enforceable only through 

executed contracts between the local agency and equipment owner. 

For FY2007-08 funds, all equipment project contracts shall be executed within 

24 months of the execution of the grant agreement between ARB and the local agency, 

extended to account for any time that the local agency was prohibited by ARB from 

implementing the grant. 

For FY2008-09 and later funds, local agencies shall obligate Program funds no later 

than 18 months from the date of the executed grant agreement between ARB and the 

local agency, or no later than 18 months from the date ARB issues a Start Letter to the 

local agency, whichever comes later. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 84 March 2010 

 Implementation

Local agency staff shall prepare and submit for review and signature two copies of the 

contract for Program funding to be signed by the equipment owner. After an equipment 

owner and the local agency sign two copies of the contract agreement, the local agency 

shall retain one fully executed copy for its files, and return one fully executed copy to the 

equipment owner. Following execution of an equipment project contract, local agency 

staff shall enter the equipment project contract information into the Goods Movement 

Online Database. 

At a minimum, an equipment project contract shall contain the following provisions: 

a) Standard contract provisions 

• Contract number—unique tracking number provided by local agency for each 

contract. 

• Effective date. 

• Term of contract (project completion time plus equipment project life). 

• Equipment owner contact information. 

• Indemnification—equipment owner agrees to indemnify and hold harmless ARB and 

the local agency for any liability arising out of the performance by the equipment 

owner. 

• Severability—remaining provisions of a contract continue in effect even if a court 

holds a specific provision invalid. 

• Force majeure—ARB, local agency, and equipment owner are not liable for delay or 

failure in performance resulting from acts beyond their control. 

• Contract amendments—amendments shall only occur by mutual agreement in 

writing and signed by all parties. 

b) General Program provisions 

• Application—incorporate by reference the original equipment owner application. 

• Reporting requirements—equipment owner is responsible for submitting annual 

reports to the local agency, unless otherwise noted in these Guidelines. The local 

agency contract with equipment owner must specify reporting requirements listed in 

the applicable Appendix. 

• Ongoing evaluations and audits—equipment owner agrees to allow ongoing 

evaluations and audits of equipment and documentation by the local agency, ARB, 

or their designated representative(s). 

• Records access requirements—equipment owner agrees to allow the local agency, 

ARB, or their designated representative(s) access to evaluate or audit Program 

records. 

• Recordkeeping requirements—equipment owner agrees to retain all records 

pertaining to the Program e.g., invoices, contracts, and correspondence, for at least 

two years after equipment project life ends or three years after final payment, 

whichever is later. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 85 March 2010 

 Implementation

• Enforcement—provisions authorizing the local agency to inspect equipment projects 

to enforce contract terms. 

• Equipment project contract non-performance provisions (see Chapter VI.I.) includes, 

but is not limited to: 

- Failure to meet the terms and conditions of an executed equipment project 

contract. 

- Equipment/engine is non-operational, malfunctioning, or damaged. 

- Failure to operate or maintain equipment in accordance with manufacturer’s 

recommendations. 

- Intentional destruction of equipment. 

- Failure to meet established deadlines for equipment project completion. 

- Failure to allow for an electronic monitoring device, if required, or tampering with 

an installed device or data. 

- Misuse of direct payments to vendors provisions. 

- Insufficient, incomplete, or faulty equipment project documentation. 

- Failure to provide required documentation or reports in a timely manner. 

• Remedies for non-performance include, but are not limited to: 

- Recovery of all or a portion of Program funds. 

- Other fiscal penalties on equipment owners based on the severity of the nonperformance. 

- Cancellation of the contract. 

- A ban on the equipment owner’s ability to participate in future State incentive 

programs. 

- Prohibiting a specific piece of equipment from participating in another State 

incentive program. 

• Contract transfer and buy-out provisions (see Chapters VI.F. through VI.H.). 

• Direct payments to dealers or manufacturers—allowance for local agency payments 

to go directly to vehicle or equipment dealers or manufacturers in the case of direct 

payments to vendors. Checks may be made payable to both parties: equipment 

owner and dealer or manufacturer, if applicable. 

• Independent contractor—equipment owner is an independent contractor and none of 

equipment owner’s agents shall be construed as agents or employees of ARB or the 

local agency. 

• Equipment maintenance—equipment owner is responsible for maintaining Programfunded engines or equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations, and as described in these Guidelines. 

• Time is of the essence—time is of the essence in the performance of all contracts. 

• Program acknowledgment—equipment owner agrees to acknowledge the Program 

as a funding source in any related media events or other publicity material. 

c) Source category-specific elements 

• Equipment project description. 

• Total cost for the equipment project. 

• Project cost breakdown (including technology/equipment purchase, labor for 

retrofit/installation, etc.). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 86 March 2010 

 Implementation

• Eligible costs—costs directly tied to the purchase of ARB-approved equipment 

projects. 

• Total Program funds for the project. 

• Non-State match funds and source(s) of those funds—includes cash, in-kind, or 

other sources. 

• Ineligible costs—costs not directly tied to the purchase of ARB-approved equipment 

projects, if applicable. 

• Project performance benchmarks—the expected activity (e.g., estimated annual 

mileage or engine hours from application) and emission reductions (estimated NOx 

and PM reductions over the life of the project from the posted ranked list) from the 

new equipment. 

• Project inspections—equipment owner agrees to pre-inspection by the local agency 

of old equipment prior to or after the execution of a contract, and post-inspection of 

the new/upgraded equipment prior to final payment. If the contract is signed before 

pre-inspection, the equipment owner cannot order the new equipment until the 

existing equipment has passed pre-inspection. 

• Project schedule—timeframe required to complete equipment project including major 

milestones. 

• Schedule to expend funds—estimated schedule for local agency to expend Program 

funds to the equipment owner. 

• Request for payment—steps required for equipment owners to request expenditure 

of Program funds, including direct payments to vendors (if applicable). 

• Equipment warranty/insurance—equipment owner is responsible for securing 

warranty and maintaining insurance on the new equipment sufficient to repay the 

State’s investment in case of major damage. 

• Electronic monitoring devices—provisions requiring equipment owners to agree to 

the installation and use of an electronic monitoring device at any time during the 

contract term. For locomotives and harbor craft utilizing the 90 percent Californiaonly operation option, the equipment owner is responsible for purchasing, installing, 

and maintaining a device that can produce the electronic reports required by ARB, 

as documented on the Program website. 

12. Tax reporting 

The local agency shall comply with all State and federal tax reporting requirements 

associated with the payment of Program funds to equipment owners. This may include 

requiring the submittal of tax information using federal tax Form W-9, and issuing a 

federal Form 1099 to the equipment owner receiving grant funds. The local agency 

shall also report the applicable tax information to the California Franchise Tax Board 

and federal Internal Revenue Service. 

13. Provisions for lease-to-own programs

The local agency projects may use a lease-to-own program(s) for truck replacement 

projects. ARB staff may revise the specific requirements of this section 13 as needed 

and post on the Program website. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 87 March 2010 

 Implementation

a) General requirements 

Lease-to-own programs shall comply with the following minimum requirements: 

• The equipment project application must be signed and submitted by the owner of the 

old truck (applicant), and must include information on the old truck to be replaced, 

the new replacement truck, and the proposed lessee.

• The applicant must be the legal owner of the old truck at the time of application and 

must participate in the lease-to-own program as either the lessor or lessee. 

• Equipment project applications may be amended to change the applicant’s 

participation in a lease-to-own program, or change the lessor if approved by the local 

agency. All amendments must be completed prior to contract execution. 

• Grant funds shall only be used to offset the capital cost of the truck and shall reduce 

the principal owed by the lessee to purchase the truck. The lessor shall not impose 

a charge on the lessee for any portion of the Program funds as a component of the 

lease payments. The lessor may set a lease payment schedule that recoups his or 

her out-of-pocket investment to purchase the new truck and a reasonable rate of 

interest over the term of the lease. Equipment project funds shall not be applied 

toward administration costs. 

• As a remedy for the non-performance of a lessee under the equipment project 

contract, the lessor, with local agency approval, may transfer the truck to a new 

lessee, so long as the new lessee agrees to sign an equipment project contract 

under the same provisions, for the remaining contract term. 

• A truck project participating in a lease-to-own program shall be subject to the same 

Program requirements as any other truck competing for funding under that local 

agency project – they must compete against all other truck projects within that 

funding category and trade corridor. 

• Prior to executing contracts for the lease-to-own program(s), the local agency must 

submit program information and sample contracts to ARB staff for review and 

approval. Deliverables for approval include: 

- Sample equipment project contract(s) the local agency will execute with the 

lessor, lessee, and/or administrative entities participating in the Program. 

- Sample lease rider (see (c) below) that will be executed by lessor and lessee. 

• Other information specified by ARB staff and posted on the Program website. 

b) Legal structure provisions 

• Equipment project contracts shall hold both the lessor and lessee legally liable (i.e., 

jointly and severally) for complying with the contract and Program requirements. 

There are multiple ways for the local agency to implement a lease-to-own program 

that ensures that the lessor and lessee are jointly and severally liable. Examples are 

shown below: 

- A local agency or an approved administrator executes a joint contract with the 

lessor and each lessee which includes all Program requirements. The 

equipment project contract may allow certain provisions to apply solely to the 

lessor (e.g., financial requirements) or lessee (e.g., operational requirements), so 

long as the local agency maintains the ability to enforce all remedies for non-
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 88 March 2010 

 Implementation

performance under the contract(s), including the recovery of funds or 

repossession of the truck, if necessary. 

- A local agency or an approved administrator may also establish separate legally 

binding agreements with the lessor and the lessee, or they may execute a 

contract with all Program requirements with a lessor and the lessor executes a 

lease agreement with each lessee. Program requirements can be distributed 

between the lessor and lessee. Both agreements must specify the ability of the 

local agency and lessor to enforce all remedies for any lessee’s non-performance 

under an equipment project contract. 

• See Chapter VI.I. for equipment project non-performance provisions. 

c) Lease agreement provisions 

• Lessor must disclose the following information in writing to the lessee prior to 

executing a lease agreement: 

- Cost of the vehicle (total cost lessor paid for the vehicle less the amount of the 

grant). 

- Amount due at lease signing with an itemization of the charges. 

- Interest rate, monthly payment, and number of payments. 

- A schedule of potential late fees, penalties, mileage charges, or other items that 

can be charged to the lessee. 

- Residual or buyout amount the lessee will be required to pay at the end of the 

lease term in order to take ownership of the truck.

- Total cost to lessee to take ownership at the end of the lease (total of fees, 

charges, monthly payments, and residual or buyout amount). 

• If the local agency does not execute a contract with the lessee, the local agency 

shall require the lessor to incorporate the following requirements in a lease rider. 

- Statement that if any provision of the lease agreement conflicts with the terms of 

the lease rider, the provisions of the lease rider shall govern. 

- Contract terms that provide for the lessee to assume ownership of the Programfunded truck at the end of the lease period. 

- Other operational requirements of the Program, as identified by ARB staff and 

posted on the Program website. 

14. Equipment project scrap requirements 

The local agency shall ensure that old equipment is scrapped (permanently removed 

from service) and associated materials disposed of in an environmentally acceptable 

manner, in accordance with these Guidelines and any applicable federal, State, or local 

laws, regulations, or requirements. 

Scrapping operations and material disposal applies to the following: 

• Truck engine repowers and truck replacement projects. 

• Harbor craft engine repowers and vessel replacement projects. 

• Locomotive engine repowers and new replacement projects. 

• Cargo equipment repower and replacement projects. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 89 March 2010 

 Implementation

Local agencies shall be responsible for implementing procedures for collecting all 

necessary information prior to scrap/disposal activities (e.g., during the pre-inspection). 

All information collected and recorded must be readily accessible to verify that scrap 

and disposal procedures were conducted for the appropriate engine, vehicle, vessel, or 

locomotive. Documentation shall be available to ARB or its designee to support 

ongoing Program evaluations or audits as necessary.

The following procedures must be implemented for all repower and replacement 

projects: 

• Prior to destruction, old equipment must be in operable working condition and legal 

for use in California, as documented in the equipment pre-inspection provisions of 

these Guidelines. 

• The old equipment engine block (for repower projects) or vehicle/vessel/locomotive, 

including the frame and engine (for replacement projects) shall be physically 

destroyed in such a manner to eliminate the possibility of future operation. Engine 

blocks shall be punctured and the vehicle, vessel, or locomotive frame structure 

shall be dismantled, cut through, and/or demolished to render the equipment useless 

and to prevent future use. 

• Licensed dismantlers are required to enter into an agreement with the local agency 

to qualify for participation. Dismantlers are required to be licensed by the 

Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) (for auto-dismantlers), and also have a valid 

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) Hazardous Materials 

Generators Permit. In addition, the dismantler must ensure compliance with any 

federal, State, and local material disposal requirements, regulations, permits or 

requirements. 

• Funding is not available for any salvage or material disposal costs, including 

hazardous waste abatement fees, labor costs, fines, permits, or other charges 

resulting from destruction or disposal. 

• All equipment to be scrapped must have a complete, visible, and legible serial 

number or a stamp of the Program equipment project number applied at the time of 

pre-inspection by the local agency or its designee. 

• The local agency or its designee must obtain digital documentation to ensure the 

engine identified in the equipment contract and the pre-inspection is the one that is 

to be scrapped. This documentation includes specific photos to be taken before the 

engine is destroyed, as well as photos after the engine is destroyed as per the 

scrappage tables in Appendices A, B, D, and E. 

The destruction of any engine without a verifiable serial number or Program equipment 

project number stamped on the equipment at the time of the equipment pre-inspection 

does not fulfill the scrappage requirement under this Program. 

The local agency must ensure the additional requirements for each piece of equipment 

are undertaken as per the scrappage tables in Appendices A, B, D, and E. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 90 March 2010 

 Implementation

15. Reuse of trucks/limited alternative to scrappage for trucks 

ARB may require or allow the local agency to make existing trucks being replaced under 

this Program available for limited reuse under specific programs approved by ARB. The 

ARB Executive Officer may approve truck reuse proposals that meet all of these criteria: 

• Deliver an equivalent or greater air quality benefit in California (compared to 

scrappage of the middle-aged truck). 

• Require any truck reused in California to be retrofit with a PM filter to ensure a 

localized health benefit. 

• Require any truck reused outside of California to be prevented from re-entering the 

State. 

• Are consistent with the principles and goals of this Program. 

• Do not increase Program cost and do not substantially increase the Program 

administration workload. 

ARB staff shall notify local agencies implementing truck projects of any new 

requirements to implement this provision, including reporting on the number of trucks 

made available for reuse as part of the semi-annual report. 

16. Equipment project post-inspections 

The local agency shall conduct and document equipment project post-inspections on all 

Program-funded equipment projects. Post-inspection information and results shall be 

entered into the Goods Movement Online Database. 

The post-inspection shall occur before final grant funding payments are made by the 

local agency to the equipment owner, and after the local agency has a valid invoice 

provided by the equipment owner. 

Post-inspections for all equipment projects shall include, but are not limited to, the 

following requirements: 

• Collection of the equipment owner’s name, mailing address, and telephone number. 

• Verification of equipment application information with new equipment to ensure the 

new equipment is consistent with the equipment described in the equipment 

application. 

• Documentation of new equipment identifiers and specifications (e.g., VIN number for 

new trucks, serial numbers for new engines, etc.). 

• Digital photographic documentation of the equipment that is being post-inspected for 

the project file. This documentation shall include: 

- A photograph of the serial number of the engine. 

- A photograph of the license plate or other distinguishing identification that is 

visible on the equipment. 

- A photograph that captures the full piece of equipment (i.e., the entire truck, 

vessel, locomotive, etc.) that is being inspected. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 91 March 2010 

 Implementation

• Methods for cataloging, referencing, storing, and easily retrieving specific equipment 

project documentation and photographs. 

• Visual witness and verification that the vehicle/engine/equipment is operational as 

stated in the contract. The inspector must visually witness and verify all engine start 

ups and mobile equipment projects operating properly. 

• Verification of the destruction of the old/replaced equipment (engine, vehicle, vessel, 

or locomotive), where applicable. The inspector must be present to personally verify 

engine removal or must be provided documentation and photographic evidence of 

the equipment before and after the engine destruction for these engines. 

In addition to the general post-inspection requirements above, Appendices A-E provide 

additional post-inspection requirements for each source category and equipment project 

option as applicable. 

17. Local agency requests to ARB for grant funds 

The local agency may request grant funds from ARB by submitting a valid Grant 

Expenditure Request signed by an authorized local agency representative acting under 

a fully executed grant agreement. See Chapter II.F.2. for ARB’s expenditure 

requirements and provisions. 

18. Local agency non-performance provisions 

The local agency shall be held responsible for the implementation of the local agency 

project. See Chapter II.F.7. for local agency non-performance provisions and 

requirements. 

B. Obligations, Expenditures, and Earned Interest 

H&S §39626.5(b) requires the local agency to award the funds via contracts with 

equipment owners within 2 years of ARB allocating funds to the agency pursuant to a 

grant agreement. The statute also requires the local agency to liquidate funds within 

4 years of the date of the award of the contract between the agency and the equipment 

owner. The funds revert to the California Ports Infrastructure, Security, and Air Quality 

Improvement Account if the statutory time frames are not met. ARB staff may provide 

direction to local agencies regarding how this statute shall be applied in situations 

where the local agencies are expressly prohibited from implementing their grant 

agreements for a period of time due to suspension of the State’s bond programs. 

1. Local agency obligation of funds to equipment owners 

For FY2007-08 funds only, local agencies shall obligate Program funds via executed 

equipment project contracts no later than 24 months from the date of the executed grant 

agreement between ARB and the local agency, excluding the period of time that the 

local agency was prohibited from implementing the grant. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 92 March 2010 

 Implementation

For FY2008-09 and later funds, local agencies shall obligate Program funds no later 

than 18 months from the date of the executed grant agreement between ARB and the 

local agency, or no later than 18 months from the date ARB issues a Start Letter to the 

local agency, whichever comes later. 

2. Local agency expenditures on equipment projects 

a) Expenditure deadlines for equipment projects 

Local agencies shall comply with the following deadlines to liquidate Program funds. 

These expenditure deadlines represent the maximum time allowed from the equipment 

project contract execution date to the expenditure of Program funds to complete and 

close out an equipment project: 

• 18 months to verify project completion/close out payment for truck retrofit, repower, 

replacement, and three-way transaction projects, and cargo handling equipment 

projects. 

• 2 years to verify project completion/close out payment for locomotive projects, nongrid-based shore power projects, and projects to install a locomotive or ship 

emissions capture and control system. 

• 3 years to verify project completion, obtain at least one year of data on actual use, 

and close out payment for truck stop or distribution center electrification projects. 

• 4 years to verify project completion/close out payment for harbor craft projects and 

grid-based shore power projects. 

b) Equipment project purchase restrictions 

Except in the case of locomotives, local agencies shall not reimburse equipment project 

applicants for orders or any payments on a new engine, piece of equipment, or vehicle 

that take place prior to local agency approval of the project through contract execution. 

Dealers ordering engines, equipment, or vehicles prior to contract execution assume all 

financial risk, and are in no way assured grant funds. 

An equipment owner may not receive engines, equipment, or vehicles, nor may work 

begin on a repower or retrofit project or a project to install electrical infrastructure, until 

the project contract is fully executed. 

c) Invoice payments (reimbursements) 

With the exception of approved direct payments to vendors as described in 

Chapter IV.A.11., local agencies shall only expend Program funds through invoice 

payments. Invoice payments provide Program funding to equipment owners on a 

reimbursement basis. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 93 March 2010 

 Implementation

After receiving a satisfactory post-inspection from the local agency on a completed 

equipment project, the equipment owner shall complete and submit an itemized invoice 

for the fully operational new engine, vehicle, or piece of equipment to the local agency 

for reimbursement. However, for truck replacement projects, the local agency may 

reimburse the equipment owner upon submission of a valid invoice once the following 

requirements are met: 

• Equipment owner or dealer must deliver the old truck(s) to a licensed dismantler 

within 30 calendar days of receiving the new fully operational equipment. 

• Local agency must verify with the dismantler that the old equipment has been 

delivered and is in custody of the dismantler. 

An invoice shall be itemized to include enough detail to ensure that the local agency 

provides reimbursement only for eligible project costs, yet be clear and concise enough 

to be understandable. The local agency shall review the itemized invoice and only pay 

for eligible expenses up to the funding caps established by these Guidelines and the 

grant agreement. 

Equipment owners shall not request or receive payments for engines, vehicles, 

equipment, or electric infrastructure that are non-operational, taxes, consulting services, 

license, permit fees, registration, insurance, or any other costs not eligible for Program 

funds. 

Charges for equipment and parts on engine repower projects are only eligible for 

funding if they are required to ensure the effective installation and functioning of the new 

engine and achieve the expected emissions performance, but are not part of typical 

vehicle or equipment maintenance or repair. Examples of ineligible repower costs 

include, but are not limited to: tires, axles, paint, brakes, and mufflers. 

Most labor expenses are not eligible for payment with Program funds; the exceptions 

are: labor to install a diesel PM filter on a truck, labor to make necessary vessel 

modifications and install the new engine in a harbor craft, and labor to install the 

electrical infrastructure to supply a ship berth or truck pedestal. Whether reimbursable 

with Program funds or not, labor expenses shall be included in the itemized invoice with 

the detailed number of hours charged and the hourly wage.

Equipment owners may submit a single, itemized invoice for multiple, completed 

equipment projects under this Program.

Invoice payments may be made directly to the equipment or engine dealer or distributor 

only if such payment arrangements are specified in the equipment project contract. 

The local agency shall maintain copies of all invoices and documentation of payment in 

the equipment project file. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 94 March 2010 

 Implementation

d) Direct payment to vendor 

Local agencies shall expend Program funds through invoice payments (described 

above) or according to the direct payment to vendor option described in this section. 

The direct payment to vendor option is only available to truck retrofit and replacement 

equipment projects, and harbor craft repower and replacement equipment projects. 

Local agencies shall approve all direct payment to vendor requests as part of their 

contract process. Direct payment terms shall be incorporated in the legally binding 

equipment project contract between the local agency and equipment owner. The 

equipment project contract shall include terms specifying arrangements for the local 

agency payments to go directly (or jointly) to the engine, truck, or retrofit dealer or 

manufacturer. 

The local agency may issue a check made payable to two parties, the equipment owner 

and the dealer or manufacturer, once the following requirements are met: 

• The local agency has entered into an agreement with a verified representative of the 

dealer or manufacturer. 

• The verified representative of the dealer or manufacturer has physical custody of the 

old equipment and has agreed to ensure that the old equipment is delivered to a 

contracted dismantler within 30 calendar days of the issuance of the check. 

3. Earned interest 

The local agency shall track the amount of interest earned on Program funds held in 

local agency accounts beginning immediately after receipt of Program funds from ARB. 

a) Calculation of earned interest 

The local agency shall maintain accounting records (e.g., general ledger) that track 

interest earned and expenditures on Program funds. 

• If the local agency maintains its Program funds in a non-segregated account, the 

local agency shall maintain accounting records that first separates Program funds 

from other funds administered by the local agency, and then further separates 

earned interest and the related expenditures. 

• The calculation of interest shall be based on an average daily balance or some other 

reasonable and demonstrable method of reallocating the proceeds from the fund 

back into the Program. 

• Earned interest shall be tracked such that it is separately identifiable from other 

Program funds. 

• Each local agency’s methodology for calculating the amount of interest earned on 

Program funds shall be consistent with how it calculates earned interest for its other 

fiscal programs. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 95 March 2010 

 Implementation

b) Reporting requirement for earned interest 

The local agency shall indicate the amount of interest earned and expended on all 

Program funds in the semi-annual report. 

• Documentation of earned interest generation and expenditure shall be retained for a 

minimum of 35 years from the grant agreement date to comply with federal and state 

bond requirements. 

c) Earned interest expenditure provisions 

The local agency shall expend interest earned from Program funds on eligible 

equipment projects (see Chapter IV.C.). 

If the local agency is authorized to use a portion of the grant for administration funds, 

the local agency may use a portion of the earned interest for administrative costs up to 

the maximum allowed by these Guidelines for that source category to implement 

additional projects. 

If a local agency is unable to expend all or a portion of the earned interest as specified 

in Chapter IV.C., the remaining earned interest shall be returned to ARB for reallocation.

C. Funding Recapture – Local Agency 

1. Process for recapturing funds 

A local agency shall obligate and expend Program funds in a timely manner. A local 

agency may choose to return unused funds to ARB for reallocation ahead of a reversion 

deadline if the local agency cannot spend the funds prior to the reversion deadline. The 

ARB Executive Officer or his or her designee has the authority to recapture funds for 

reallocation and expenditure prior to reversion deadlines, and may amend or modify an 

impacted grant agreement, or establish a new grant agreement, to implement this 

policy. The local agency shall agree to comply with the recapture process. 

Recaptured funds may become available to a local agency in several ways including, 

but not limited to, the following: 

• Allocated to a local agency by ARB. 

• Funds obligated through contract with equipment owners that are returned or not 

spent prior to the statutory deadline. 

• Earned interest. 

• Funds paid to the local agency by equipment owners through voluntary buyout, 

involuntary buyout (equipment rendered inoperable), or penalties. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 96 March 2010 

 Implementation

2. Expending recaptured funds 

The local agency shall obligate and expend recaptured funds according to the following 

hierarchy: 

• Eligible equipment projects on the ARB-approved ranked list for the funding category 

covered by the grant that generated the funds. 

• Eligible equipment projects from a new solicitation for the funding category covered 

by the grant that generated the funds. 

• Upon ARB staff approval, eligible equipment projects for another funding category 

covered by an existing grant agreement between the local agency and ARB. 

The local agency shall return recaptured funds to ARB for re-allocation if it cannot 

expend them according to these priorities. 

• With the exception of funds acquired through buyouts and penalties, the local 

agency shall track fund activity by year of appropriation. A local agency shall also 

track all fund activity by fiscal year. 

• The local agency shall report semi-annually all Program funding activity using the 

Goods Movement Online Database. 

D. Ongoing Local Agency Evaluation of Equipment Projects 

Local agencies shall evaluate equipment projects on an ongoing basis. The ongoing 

evaluation process is designed to meet the accountability requirements of SB 88 and 

the Governor’s Executive Order S-02-07. 

Local agency evaluation efforts shall include, but are not limited to: ongoing desk 

reviews of reports and equipment project updates provided by equipment owners, 

review of electronic monitoring unit data (as applicable), site inspections, equipment 

inspections, review of equipment maintenance and activity logs, and other measures 

deemed appropriate by ARB or the local agency. 

Equipment owners shall permit the local agency, ARB, the Department of Finance, the 

Bureau of State Audits, or any authorized designee, access, during normal business 

hours, to conduct ongoing evaluations for the purpose of monitoring the Program. 

E. Local Agency Reporting Requirements 

Local agencies shall obtain, verify, and submit to ARB all local agency and equipment 

project reporting information as outlined in these Guidelines. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 97 March 2010 

 Implementation

1. Quarterly data updates 

Local agencies shall submit to ARB quarterly data updates on all local agency projects 

and the equipment projects associated with each. The local agency shall submit these 

updates using the Goods Movement Online Database when available. 

Local agency quarterly data updates shall begin, at a minimum, one quarter after the 

beginning of the first solicitation period, and continue until the local agency provides 

ARB with the local agency project completion report (see below). These quarterly data 

updates shall be cumulative, reflecting the most current local agency project 

information. ARB staff may temporarily eliminate this requirement for grants that are 

suspended, or have recently been suspended, due to lack of bond funding. 

Quarterly data updates to ARB shall include the following information, if applicable: 

• Start and end dates of most recent equipment project solicitation. 

• Updates to each equipment project application received by the local agency through 

the solicitation process, including: 

- Equipment project application information. 

- Equipment pre-inspection information. 

- Funding status (selected for funding, not funded).

- Equipment project contract information. 

- Equipment post-inspection information. 

- Equipment project status (active/withdrawn/ineligible). 

• Total Program funds obligated. 

• Total Program funds expended/remaining (breakdown by project funds and 

administration funds). 

2. Semi-annual report 

Local agencies shall submit to ARB semi-annual reports through the Goods Movement 

Online Database or another method established by ARB. 

Local agency semi-annual reports shall begin the year following initial ARB payment of 

project funds to the local agency, and continue for the term of the grant agreement. 

ARB staff may standardize the submittal dates for these reports and notify local 

agencies. Local agencies shall submit semi-annual reports on the schedule established 

by ARB [H&S §39625.02(f)(1) and Executive Order S-02-07]. The purpose of the report 

is to ensure that each local agency project is being executed in a timely fashion, within 

the scope and budget identified when ARB awarded funding. 

At a minimum, the semi-annual report shall include the following information: 

• All data required in the quarterly report. 

• Amount of interest earned from Program funds. 

• Recaptured fund activity (see Chapter IV.C.). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter IV. Local Agency Project 98 March 2010 

 Implementation

• The anticipated costs of the local agency project compared to the total estimated 

cost in the grant agreement. 

• Actions undertaken to ensure funded local agency project is being implemented 

according to budget allocations or a plan for achieving the benefits of the project by 

either down-scoping the project or by identifying alternative funding sources to meet 

any identified cost increases and remain within budget. 

• The anticipated duration of the local agency project compared to the original 

schedule at the time the grant agreement was executed. 

• Status of equipment project tracking efforts to ensure compliance with operating 

conditions (including the results of the annual reports submitted by the equipment 

owners, once available). 

• Status of equipment owner reporting compliance. 

• A document signed by the local agency’s Chief Administrative Officer, Chief 

Financial Officer, or Program Grant Administrator verifying that the equipment 

project and financial data submitted in the report is complete, accurate, and that 

there are no known instances of fraud. 

• Any other information requested by ARB staff. 

3. Local agency project completion report 

Local agencies shall submit to ARB a local agency project completion report no later 

than six months following the full local agency liquidation of Program funds under the 

grant agreement [H&S §39625.02(f)(2)]. This report shall provide information regarding 

the specific local agency expenditure of Program funds on administration and 

equipment project costs. 

At a minimum, the local agency project completion report shall include the following, as 

applicable, based on specific guidance from ARB staff: 

• The final costs of the local agency project compared to the total estimated cost in the 

grant agreement. 

• The duration of the local agency project compared to the original schedule at the 

time the grant agreement was executed. 

• The performance outcomes of the project (number of pieces of cleaner equipment 

and reductions in PM and NOx emissions) compared to the performance 

benchmarks identified in the grant agreement. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter V. State Agency Project 99 March 2010 

 Implementation

V. State Agency Project Implementation

ARB will enter into interagency agreements with other State agencies that are awarded 

funds for a truck loan or loan guarantee program (loan project). If ARB is the State 

agency, no interagency agreement is required. The interagency agreement shall 

specify the requirements that the State agency and/or its contractor(s) must meet. 

These include implementation and funding requirements. 

A. Implementation Requirements 

A State agency implementing a loan project (either directly or through contractors) must 

meet the following conditions: 

• Use funds to upgrade or replace eligible diesel trucks according to the project 

specifications in Appendix A. 

• Adhere to any financial terms and conditions established by ARB staff, which may 

include interest rate, loan term, and minimum credit requirements. 

• Maintain a public website. 

• Use marketing strategies in partnership with ARB and local agencies to target 

independent owner-operators and smaller fleets that need financial assistance. 

For loan project applicants who are not receiving a Program grant, the State agency or 

its contractor(s) shall also: 

• Determine that the applicants meet the Program eligibility requirements. 

• Conduct a compliance check on the old vehicle and the equipment owner. 

• Perform pre-inspections of old equipment. 

• Perform post-inspections of new equipment. 

• Ensure old equipment is scrapped. 

B. Transfer, Obligation, and Expenditure of Funds 

Funds will be considered obligated when available to ARB for expenditure and upon 

execution of the interagency agreement. ARB will transfer the funds to the State 

agency according to the terms of the interagency agreement. 

If no interagency agreement is required because ARB is the recipient, funds are 

considered obligated when they are awarded by the Board and available to ARB for 

expenditure. Funds are considered expended (liquidated) when the State agency or its 

contractor(s) has completed the transaction which may include: executing loan 

documents, transferring funds into an account for loan guarantees, or transferring funds 

for interest rate subsidies. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter V. State Agency Project 100 March 2010 

 Implementation

C. Ongoing Evaluation of Loan and Loan Guarantee Programs 

State agencies and any contractor(s) shall evaluate loan and loan guarantee projects on 

an ongoing basis to meet the accountability requirements of SB 88 and the Governor’s 

Executive Order S-02-07. The State agency shall include information in its application 

to ARB for funding that describes the proposed actions evaluate these projects. ARB 

shall include appropriate provisions for ongoing evaluations in the interagency 

agreement. 

Equipment owners shall permit the State agency, ARB, the Department of Finance, the 

Bureau of State Audits, or any authorized designee, access, during normal business 

hours, to conduct ongoing evaluations for the purpose of monitoring the Program. 

D. State Agency Reporting Requirements 

1. Semi-annual report 

State agencies shall obtain, verify, and submit to ARB all equipment project reporting 

information as described below. 

• Total number of truck projects funded, including the number of retrofits and 

replacements by loan type. 

• Total Program funds obligated and liquidated. 

• Amount of interest earned from Program funds. 

• A cumulative list of all loan and loan guarantee projects funded under the 

interagency agreement. 

• A document signed by an authorized individual of the State agency verifying that the 

equipment project and financial data submitted in the report is complete, accurate, 

and that there are no known instances of fraud. 

• Any other information requested by ARB staff. 

2. Project completion report 

State agencies shall submit to ARB a local agency project completion report no later 

than six months following the full local agency liquidation of Program funds under the 

interagency agreement [H&S §39625.02(f)(2)]. 

This report shall provide information regarding the expenditure of Program funds on 

administration and equipment project costs. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter V. State Agency Project 101 March 2010 

 Implementation

The State agency project completion report shall include the following, as applicable 

based on specific guidance from ARB staff: 

• The final costs of the project compared to the total estimated cost in the interagency 

agreement. 

• The duration of the project compared to the original schedule at the time the 

interagency agreement was executed. 

• The performance outcomes of the project (number of cleaner trucks funded 

compared to the performance benchmarks identified in the interagency agreement). 

• A list of the completed loan and loan guarantee projects. 

• Amount of interest accrued on Program funds. 

• List and description of equipment projects funded with earned interest. 

• A document signed by an authorized individual of the State agency verifying that the 

equipment project and financial data submitted in the report is complete, accurate, 

and that there are no known instances of fraud.
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter VI. General Equipment 102 March 2010 

 Project Requirements

VI. General Equipment Project Requirements 

A. Ownership Requirements 

Equipment project applications shall be signed and submitted by the current owner of 

the existing equipment that will be upgraded or replaced. Equipment project 

applications for ships at berth and locomotive emissions capture and control systems 

shall be signed and submitted by the future owner of the new equipment because there 

is no existing equipment. Non-owner applications are not eligible for funding. 

Individuals or companies that operate the existing equipment under a lease agreement 

with the equipment owner are prohibited from applying for bond funding. 

Individuals or companies that currently own the equipment but will operate the 

replacement equipment under a lease-to-own agreement may participate if a lease-toown program is offered by the local agency according to the provisions outlined in 

Chapter IV.A.13. 

The owner of existing equipment applying for truck replacement under a lease-to-own 

program may apply jointly with the proposed lessor or lessee. 

B. Third Party Applications 

Third party applications are not allowed. The owner of the existing equipment must sign 

and agree to the submittal of the equipment project application. 

A third party may, however, complete an application (in whole or in part) on the owner’s 

behalf. Equipment project applications shall include a signature section for third parties. 

The third party signature section shall include signature and date lines, and blanks for 

the third party to list how much they are being paid, if anything, to complete the 

application and what source of funds are being used to pay them. 

C. Equipment Project Specifications 

Equipment owners may refer to Appendices A-F for descriptions and specifications for 

the equipment projects eligible for Program funds. Equipment projects shall comply 

with all requirements and restrictions in the Guidelines, except for those allowable 

alternatives that the local agency is approved to implement, consistent with 

Chapter III.C. 

Equipment owners are advised to carefully review the information packets provided by 

local agencies during the equipment project solicitation period. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter VI. General Equipment 103 March 2010 

 Project Requirements

D. Equipment Project Application Requirements 

1. Equipment project information 

Equipment owners are required to provide project application information for the 

applicable equipment project option identified in Appendices A-F. This typically includes 

information on: the equipment owner, the existing equipment, the proposed equipment 

project (with funding level and project life), costs, schedules, and operational/activity 

data to quantify the benefits of the equipment project. 

2. Equipment project schedule 

As part of the application, equipment owners shall commit to meeting project schedule 

requirements listed in the equipment project application for the major milestones listed 

by source category in Appendices A-F. The equipment project schedule shall also be 

included as part of the equipment project contract signed between the local agency and 

equipment owner. Adjustments to the schedule prior to contract execution may only 

occur with local agency consent. 

3. Case-by-case equipment projects 

Only equipment project options specifically identified in these Guidelines shall be 

eligible for Program funds. Equipment project options beyond those identified in these 

Guidelines may be recommended to ARB staff for inclusion in future Guideline updates. 

4. Certifications and disclosures 

Equipment project applications shall include certifications and disclosures that the 

equipment owner shall sign, that include, at a minimum: 

• Certification that once the equipment owner submits the equipment project 

application, the owner shall not submit other applications to local agencies in any 

trade corridor for funding for the same truck, locomotive, equipment, vessel, berth, or 

facility under this Program or the Carl Moyer program. This prohibition does not 

include applications for loans or loan guarantees. 

• Disclosure of any other source(s) of funding that the equipment owner has applied 

for that would be used for the same equipment project. The disclosure shall identify 

the source of funds, how much is being applied for, and what the funding would be 

used for. 

• Disclosure of the value of any existing financial incentive that directly reduces the 

project cost, including tax credits or deductions, grants, or other public financial 

assistance, for the same equipment project. 

• Certification that the equipment owner has reviewed the application and that the 

application information is correct. 

• Certification that neither the owner nor equipment identified in the equipment project 

application has any outstanding violations of ARB regulations. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter VI. General Equipment 104 March 2010 

 Project Requirements

• Certification that equipment project match funding is reasonably available to 

complete the equipment project according to the proposed timeframe. 

• Certification that Program funds were not used to previously upgrade the equipment 

identified in the equipment project application, except for funds received to retrofit a 

truck with a diesel PM filter. 

• Certification that the equipment owner has all the information needed to understand 

what must be done to maintain eligibility for Program funds. This includes 

maintaining registration; keeping equipment in legal operating condition; correcting 

any air pollution citations; and reporting, repairing, or replacing equipment that has 

been damaged, destroyed, or stolen. ARB staff shall develop, and make available 

on the Program website, a fact sheet for all local agencies for incorporation or 

attachment to the application.

The equipment owner may be allowed to re-apply for equipment project funding if a 

previous application for the same project has been rejected and is no longer being 

considered by a local agency for funding. 

An equipment owner who is found to have submitted multiple applications for the same 

equipment project and not disclosed any other requested, or received financial incentive 

may be disqualified from funding for that engine or piece of equipment under this 

Program. The equipment owner may also be prohibited from submitting future 

applications to any and all ARB incentive programs, or local agency incentive programs. 

5. Equipment project funding demonstration 

Equipment project applications shall list the source(s) funds to complete the proposed 

equipment project, including the proposed Program funds, and matching funds from 

other State, local, federal, or private sources. The equipment owner may be required to 

demonstrate fund availability or provide proof of approved financing at any time during 

the application and review process. 

Equipment project applications may identify any loan or lease-to-own programs the 

equipment owner intends to utilize to fully fund the equipment project. 

The total project cost shall include the purchase price of the equipment, including 

shipping charges, and the cost of installation or construction (as applicable). Installation 

costs shall only include installation of the components necessary to operate the 

equipment. 

• Program funds may only be used for eligible expenses. 

• Optional items (such as cigar lighters or custom mud flaps on trucks) shall be paid at 

the owner’s expense. 

• Taxes, fees, insurance, and other charges may not be included as part of the total 

project cost. 

• Electricity and fuel costs may not be included in the project cost. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter VI. General Equipment 105 March 2010 

 Project Requirements

• Costs for equipment and parts on engine repower projects are only eligible for 

funding if they are required to ensure the effective installation and functioning of the 

new engine, and achieve the expected emissions performance, but are not part of 

typical vehicle or equipment maintenance or repair. Examples of ineligible repower 

costs include, but are not limited to: tires, axles, paint, brakes, and mufflers. 

The equipment owner may estimate the total project cost in the first year of operation. 

E. Equipment Project Operation 

Equipment owners with executed equipment project contracts shall be responsible for 

the operation of equipment funded under this Program, in compliance with the 

conditions of the contract. Except for approved truck lease-to-own programs, 

equipment owners may not assign, sell, transfer, license, or subcontract any rights or 

obligations to a third party without the express prior written consent of the local agency. 

F. Equipment Accidentally Rendered Inoperable or Stolen 

If the equipment owner’s insurance company or the local agency determines that 

Program-funded equipment has been accidentally rendered inoperable, the equipment 

owner may replace the inoperable equipment with equipment certified to equal or lower 

emission levels, and continue with the terms of the original contract or request to closeout the terms of the contract with the local agency. The equipment owner shall notify 

the local agency if that owner chooses to use his/her own funds to replace the 

inoperable equipment with equipment certified to equal or lower emission levels, and 

continue with the terms of the original contract. The equipment owner shall be 

responsible for providing the local agency with updated information for the new 

equipment. 

If the equipment owner reports to the local agency that the Program-funded equipment 

has been stolen, and this is confirmed by a police report and an insurance company 

determination of loss due to theft, the equipment owner may replace the stolen 

equipment with equipment certified to equal or lower emission levels at his/her own 

cost, and continue with the terms of the original contract or request to close-out the 

terms of the contract with the local agency. 

The equipment owner shall notify the local agency if he or she chooses to close-out the 

contract due to accident or theft. The equipment owner shall provide supporting 

documentation (e.g., salvage title, policy report, insurance company determination, copy 

of insurance company reimbursement quote/check, and/or other) to the local agency 

exhibiting that the equipment was accidentally rendered inoperable or stolen and remit 

the following amount to the local agency: 

Insurance reimbursement amount (minus any lien amounts), or 

















= − ×

Equipment Project Life

Contract Value Contract Recapture Amount Contract Value Elapsed Equipment Project Life
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter VI. General Equipment 106 March 2010 

 Project Requirements

Example: An equipment owner receives $50,000 in Program funding for a truck 

replacement project. The owner signs an equipment project contract for five years 

(60 months). Three years and six months (42 months) after the project has been postinspected and placed into operation, the equipment is rendered inoperable according to 

the above description. The equipment owner may request to close-out the terms of the 

contract and pay $15,000 to the local agency. 

Contract Recapture Amount: $15,000 = $50,000 – (42 months x ($50,000/60 months)) 

G. Equipment Transfer/Sales Requirements

Equipment owners with executed equipment project contracts with a local agency shall 

be fully and legally responsible for the operation of equipment funded under this 

Program in compliance with the conditions of the contract. Equipment owners may not 

assign, sell, transfer, license, or subcontract any rights or obligations to a third party 

without the express prior written consent of the local agency. 

If the original owner of Program-funded equipment chooses to sell the equipment for 

any reason, or is required to replace the equipment with cleaner equipment prior to the 

end of the equipment project life, the original owner shall notify the local agency and 

receive prior written consent for the transaction from the local agency. 

Prior to completing the transaction, the original owner shall inform the party purchasing 

the equipment of the equipment project contract provisions, and disclose the remaining 

contract term. The original owner shall be responsible for establishing contact between 

the new owner and local agency to facilitate the transfer of the contract provisions and 

terms. The original owner shall be responsible for providing the local agency with the 

purchase price of all sold Program-funded equipment. 

The original owner shall provide the prospective new owner with valid contact 

information for the local agency so the new owner can assume legal responsibility under 

the original contract or enter into a new equipment project contract with the local 

agency, for the remainder of the contract term. The original equipment owner who 

received Program funding shall not be relieved of his or her legal obligation to fulfill the 

conditions of the contract unless the new owner has assumed responsibility through an 

executed contract with the local agency. 

If the equipment is sold, and the original equipment owner failed to fulfill the 

responsibilities described in this section, remedies for equipment project nonperformance shall be imposed (see section I below).
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter VI. General Equipment 107 March 2010 

 Project Requirements

H. Optional Equipment Project Contract Buy-out 

If the owner of Program-funded equipment cannot meet the obligations of the 

equipment project contract for any reason and does not use the options in sections F 

and G above, the owner may request to buy-out the remaining time on the contract prior 

to the end of the contract term. The owner shall notify the local agency and receive 

prior written consent for the transaction from the local agency. The equipment owner 

shall remit the contract buy-out amount to the local agency, based on the remainder of 

the contract value and an administrative fee. Any monies received by the local agency 

under this buy-out provision shall be treated as recaptured funds subject to the 

requirements of Chapter IV.C. The contract buy-out amount shall be determined 

according to the formula shown below. 

Equipment Project Contract Buy-out Formula: 

Admin Fee

Equipment Project Life

Elapsed Equipment Project Life Contract Value Contract Buy Out Amount Contract Value +













 ×

− = −

The Administrative Fee shall be: 

• $5,000 for truck projects. 

• $10,000 for locomotive, commercial harbor craft, and cargo equipment projects. 

• $250,000 for ships at berth projects. 

Example: An equipment owner receives $50,000 in Program funding for a truck 

replacement project. The owner signs an equipment project contract for five years 

(60 months). Three years and six months (42 months) after the project has been postinspected and placed into operation, the equipment owner requests to close-out the 

outstanding contract. The equipment owner may request to close-out the terms of the 

contract and pay $20,000 to the local agency. 

Contract Buy-out Amount: $20,000 = ($50,000 - (42 months x ($50,000/60 months))) + $5,000 

I. Equipment Project Non-performance 

All equipment project contracts signed by the equipment owner shall include nonperformance provisions enforceable by the local agency. Non-performance includes, 

but is not limited to:

• Failure to meet the terms and conditions of an executed equipment project contract, 

including, but not limited to, equipment operating conditions and geographic 

restrictions. 

• Equipment/engine is non-operational, malfunctioning, or damaged. 

• Failure to operate or maintain equipment in accordance with manufacturer’s 

recommendations. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Chapter VI. General Equipment 108 March 2010 

 Project Requirements

• Failure to meet established deadlines for equipment project completion. 

• Failure to allow for an electronic monitoring device, or tampering with an installed 

device or data. 

• Misuse of direct payments to vendors provisions. 

• Insufficient, incomplete, or faulty equipment project documentation. 

• Failure to provide required documentation or reports in a timely manner. 

Remedies for equipment project non-performance may include, but are not limited to: 

• Recovery of all or a portion of Program funds. 

• Other fiscal penalties on equipment owners based on the severity of the nonperformance. 

• Cancellation of the contract. 

• A ban on the equipment owner’s ability to participate in future State incentive 

programs. 

• Prohibiting a specific piece of equipment from participating in another State incentive 

program. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

March 2010 

APPENDICES 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

March 2010 

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

March 2010 

APPENDICES A-E 

Project Specifications 

for FY2008-09 and Later Funds 

by Source Category 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

March 2010 

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-1 March 2010

APPENDIX A Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks 

(Combines Port/Rail Yard and Other Trucks) 

A. Equipment Project Specifications 

Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Heavy-duty diesel trucks used to move goods (a majority of the time) with a declared 

Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) or declared Combined Gross Vehicle Weight (CGW) of 

60,001 lbs or greater on current Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) registration (DMV 

weight code “K” or higher) and a manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 

31,000 lbs or greater listed on the application and verified at pre-inspection. 

Equipment owner must demonstrate: 

• At least 75% operation within California for the past 2 years. 

• Registration: 

o Continuous registration (California base-plated or International Registration 

Plan (IRP)) in California for the past 2 years, or 

o Current California registration and minimum 8 months available California 

DMV registration history supplemented by alternate documentation showing 

California operation for the past 2 years. 

• New engines for repower or replacement projects meet the applicable Program 

requirements: 

o MY2010 emissions means 0.20 g/bhp-hr or less NOx (FEL and CERT 

values) and 0.01 g/bhp-hr or less PM (CERT value) as certified by an ARB 

Executive Order for on-road use with an intended service of Heavy-Heavy 

Duty Diesel (HHDD) for diesel engines or Heavy Duty Otto (HDO) for 

applicable alternative fuel vehicles. 

o MY2007 emissions means 1.20 g/bhp-hr or less NOx (FEL and CERT 

values) and 0.01 g/bhp-hr or less PM (CERT value) as certified by an ARB 

Executive Order for on-road use with an intended service of HHDD for diesel 

engines or HDO for applicable alternative fuel vehicles. 

• New or used trucks purchased for a truck replacement project have a manufacturer’s 

GVWR of 33,001 lbs or greater (Class 8). 

Drayage truck owners are eligible to apply for priority drayage truck funding that may be 

available for truck replacement or PM + NOx retrofit projects if the owner demonstrates 

all of the following for the existing truck to be upgraded: 

• Meets all of the other requirements of this section. 

• Made at least 12 visits to California ports and rail yards (combined) over the last 

12 months. 

• For truck replacement projects (Option 1), has a MY1994-2003 engine, and was 

registered in the California Drayage Truck Registry and was retrofitted with an ARBverified Level 3 diesel particulate filter by June 30, 2010. 

• For PM + NOx retrofit projects (Option 2), has a MY2004-2006 engine, was 

registered in the California Drayage Truck Registry by June 30, 2010, and would be 

upgraded with a PM + NOx retrofit no later than December 31, 2010. 

Ineligible 

Equipment 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s public and utility fleet rule. 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s solid waste collection vehicle rule. 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s diesel cargo handling equipment rule. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-2 March 2010

Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (cont.)

General 

Requirements 

(applicable to 

all project 

options) 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to the project life specified with the applicable equipment project option. 

• Adhere to all Program Requirements during the project life. 

• Commit to 100% California-only operation (or 90% California-only operation for a 

replacement project, if that option is offered by the local agency and has been 

selected by the equipment owner) and California base-plated registration or 

California IRP. Dual plates and out-of-state registrations are prohibited. 

• Commit to at least 50% of travel within the four trade corridors for the duration of the 

project life. 

• Maintain current DMV registration with a declared GVW or CGW of 60,001 lbs or 

greater (DMV weight code “K” or higher) at all times during the project life. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the project 

life. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain truck in good operating condition and according to manufacturer’s 

recommendations. 

• Maintain collision/comprehensive insurance on the truck for replacements. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty on the program-funded equipment. 

• Correct outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the owner’s entire 

fleet of vehicles. 

ARB will post and update information on the Program website describing the installation 

and operational deadlines and when the program-funded vehicle will become eligible to 

be included in the equipment owner’s Statewide Truck and Bus Rule fleet compliance 

strategy for the applicable project option. 

Modifying an 

Application 

Equipment owners may change the project option, funding option or lease-to-own 

program participation after the local agency solicitation period has closed if permitted by 

the local agency and subject to the following requirements: 

• The change must result in a funding amount equal to or less than the amount that 

was requested in the original application. 

• The change must result in a calculated project cost-effectiveness equal to or greater 

than the project listed in the original application. 

Equipment owners cannot substitute a different vehicle or change the ownership of the 

existing vehicle identified on the application after the local agency solicitation period has 

closed. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-3 March 2010

Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (cont.)

Option (1) 

PM Retrofit 

Partial funding (see options below) to retrofit an eligible MY1994-2006 heavy duty diesel 

engine with an ARB verified Level 3 Plus diesel particulate filter that reduces PM by 85% 

or more. Trucks serving ports and intermodal rail yards (as indicated by the Drayage 

Truck Registry) are not eligible. 

Funding 

Options 

1. $5,000/truck with a project life of 2 years. 

Program-funded diesel particulate filter shall be installed and operational (post 

inspection completed) at least 6 months prior to a regulatory requirement for that 

technology or level of emissions control under the best available control technology 

provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

2. $10,000/truck with project life of 4 years. 

Program-funded diesel particulate filter shall be installed and operational (post 

inspection completed) at least 12 months prior to a regulatory requirement for that 

technology or level of emissions control under the best available control technology 

provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

Requirements In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 100% California-only operation. 

• Demonstrate that any mid-1990s engine subject to the software upgrades for diesel 

trucks (i.e., chip reflash) has completed the upgrade. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-4 March 2010

Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (cont.)

Option (2) 

PM + NOx 

Retrofit

Partial funding of up to $20,000/truck to retrofit an eligible MY2004-2006 heavy duty 

diesel truck engine with an ARB-verified diesel emission control strategy (VDECS) that 

reduces NOx exhaust emissions by an amount that meets the 2007 or 2010 Model Year 

NOx Emissions Equivalent and reduces diesel PM by 85% or more. 

Requirements Program-funded VDECS and diesel particulate filter shall be installed and operational 

(post inspection completed) at least 3 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that 

technology or level of emissions control under the best available control technology 

provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. For fleets of 3 or fewer trucks subject to 

the Statewide Truck and Bus Rule, the equipment project shall be installed and 

operational at least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that technology or level 

of emissions control under the best available control technology provisions of any 

adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

The 2007 Model Year NOx Emissions Equivalent is defined by the California Code of 

Regulations, Section 2025 as a 2004-2006 model year heavy-duty diesel engine 

equipped with a VDECS that reduces NOx exhaust emissions by at least 40% (ARB 

Mark 2 rating). 

The 2010 Model Year NOx Emissions Equivalent is defined by the California Code of 

Regulations, Section 2025 as a 2004-2006 model year heavy-duty diesel engine 

equipped with a VDECS that reduces NOx exhaust emissions by at least 85% (ARB 

Mark 5 rating). 

In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to a project life of 5 years or 500,000 miles, whichever comes first. 

• Commit to 100% California-only operation. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-5 March 2010

Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (cont.)

Option (3) 

Repower 

Partial funding of up to $30,000/truck to repower a truck with an eligible MY1994-2006 

heavy duty diesel engine with a new engine that meets MY2010 emissions. 

Requirements Program-funded engine shall be installed and operational (post inspection completed, 

except scrappage) at least 3 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that technology 

or level of emissions control under the best available control technology provisions of any 

adopted rule for in-use trucks. For fleets of 3 or fewer trucks subject to the Statewide 

Truck and Bus Rule and all eligible 1999 or older trucks, the equipment project shall be 

installed and operational at least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that 

technology or level of emissions control under the best available control technology 

provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to a project life of 5 years or 500,000 miles, whichever comes first. 

• Commit to 100% California-only operation. 

• Scrap the old engine. 

• Purchase a minimum of a 1-year or 100,000-mile major component engine warranty 

for the replacement engine that covers parts and labor. 

• Provide a copy of ARB Executive Order documenting that the new engine meets 

MY2010 emissions. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-6 March 2010

Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (cont.)

Option (4) 

Replacement 

Partial funding (see options below) to replace 1 or 2 truck(s) equipped with eligible 

MY2003 or older heavy duty diesel engine(s) with a diesel or alternative fuel truck. 

Funding 

Options 

(drayage trucks)

Owners of eligible drayage trucks with a MY1994-2003 engine that commit to 90% or 

100% California-only operation may have the option to compete for prioritized funding as 

follows: 

1. $50,000/truck for a replacement truck with an engine that meets MY2010 emissions. 

2. $30,000/truck for a replacement truck with an engine that meets MY2007 emissions. 

To be eligible, the replacement truck must have less than 500,000 miles with 

odometer verification at the post inspection. 

Note: If priority drayage truck funding is exhausted before all eligible drayage trucks are 

funded, any remaining, unfunded drayage trucks will compete with other trucks. 

Funding 

Options 

(other trucks) 

Owners of all eligible non-drayage trucks that commit to 90% or 100% California-only 

operation can compete for funding as follows: 

1. $60,000/truck for a replacement truck with an engine that meets MY2010 emissions. 

2. $40,000/truck for a replacement truck with an engine that meets MY2007 emissions. 

To be eligible, the used replacement truck must have less than 500,000 miles with 

odometer verification at the post inspection. 

Requirements Program-funded replacement projects shall be purchased and operational (postinspection completed, except scrappage) at least 3 years prior to a regulatory 

requirement for that technology or level of emissions control under the best available 

control technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. For fleets of 3 or 

fewer trucks subject to the Statewide Truck and Bus Rule and all eligible 1999 or older 

trucks, the equipment project shall be installed and operational at least 2 years prior to a 

regulatory requirement for that technology or level of emissions control under the best 

available control technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to a project life of at least 5 years or 500,000 miles, whichever comes first. 

• Commit to 100% California-only operation (or 90% if that option has been selected). 

• Scrap the old truck(s). 

• Purchase a minimum of a 1-year or 100,000-mile major component engine warranty 

for the replacement vehicle that covers parts and labor. 

• Provide a copy of ARB Executive Order documenting that the new truck engine 

meets the applicable MY2007 or MY2010 emissions. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-7 March 2010

Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (cont.)

Option (5) 

Three-Way 

Truck 

Transactions 

1. $60,000/truck to replace an eligible truck that has a MY1998-2006 engine (Truck A) 

with a diesel or alternative fuel truck (Truck C) meeting MY2010 emissions. 

2. Optional $5,000/truck to equip Truck A with an ARB-verified Level 3 Plus diesel 

particulate filter that reduces diesel PM by 85% or more; and 

3. Scrap a MY1993 or older diesel truck (Truck B) and replace with Truck A. 

Truck A: Heavy duty diesel truck with MY1998-2006 engine. 

Truck B: Heavy duty diesel truck with MY1993 or older engine. 

Truck C: Heavy duty truck (diesel or alternative) that meets MY2010 emissions. 

Requirements Truck C shall be purchased and operational (post inspection completed, except 

scrappage) at least 3 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that technology or level 

of emissions control under the best available control technology provisions of any 

adopted rule for in-use trucks. For fleets of 3 or fewer trucks subject to the Statewide 

Truck and Bus Rule and all eligible 1999 or older trucks, the equipment project shall be 

installed and operational at least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that 

technology or level of emissions control under the best available control technology 

provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

Truck A shall be equipped with an operational diesel particulate filter at least 6 months 

prior to a regulatory requirement for that technology or level of emissions control under 

the best available control technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks if 

optional retrofit funding is received for Truck A. 

In addition to the applicable General Requirements listed previously, the original owner 

of Truck A and new owner of new Truck C shall: 

• Equip Truck A with an ARB verified Level 3 Plus diesel particulate filter and transfer 

ownership (if applicable) to the owner of old Truck B. 

• Commit to a project life of 5 years or 500,000 miles, whichever comes first, on 

Truck C. 

• Commit to 90% or 100% California-only operation. 

• Purchase a minimum of a 1-year or 100,000-mile major component engine warranty 

for Truck C that covers parts and labor. 

• Provide a copy of ARB Executive Order documenting that the new truck engine in 

Truck C meets MY2010 emissions. 

• Demonstrate that any mid-1990s engine subject to the software upgrades for diesel 

trucks (i.e., chip reflash) has completed the upgrade on Truck A. 

In addition to the applicable General Requirements listed previously, the original owner 

of old Truck B and new owner of retrofit Truck A shall: 

• Scrap Truck B. 

• Commit to a project life of 2 years and all applicable Program requirements on 

Truck A. 

• Commit to 100% California-only operation. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-8 March 2010

Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (cont.)

Eligible 

Equipment 

Truck stops, intermodal facilities, distribution centers, and other places where Class 8 

heavy diesel trucks (over 33,000 lbs) congregate in a trade corridor. 

Option (6) 

Electrification 

Infrastructure 

for Truck Stop 

or Distribution 

Center 

Landside electrification infrastructure to reduce diesel engine idling and use of dieselfueled internal combustion auxiliary power systems may be funded at the lower of 50% of 

eligible project costs or a level commensurate with a cost-effectiveness of 0.20 pounds of 

weighted emissions reduced per State dollar invested. Truck stop/distribution center 

electrification infrastructure projects shall be eligible to compete for funding only if the 

cost-effectiveness is equal or greater than 0.20 pounds of weighted emissions reduced 

per State dollar invested. 

Eligible costs include purchase and installation of electrical infrastructure to: enable 

heating, cooling, and the use of cab power for parked trucks at truck stops; and enable 

the use of power for transport refrigeration units and auxiliary power systems at 

distribution centers, intermodal facilities, and other places where trucks congregate. 

Reimbursement for the eligible costs shall be based on demonstrated use over the first 

year of operation. 

Ineligible costs include on-board auxiliary power units and other equipment installed on 

trucks, transport refrigeration units, electricity costs and operation and maintenance 

costs. 

Requirements In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 10 years of operation. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty. 

• Comply with all local permitting requirements. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Option (1): Average cost of a diesel particulate filter is ~$15,000. 

• Option (2): Total cost of a NOx+PM retrofit is expected to be $40,000. 

• Option (3): Total cost of a repower project is expected to be $60,000. 

• Option (4,5): Total cost of a new MY2010 compliant truck is ~$120,000 (diesel) to 

~$180,000 (natural gas). Total cost of a used MY2007 truck (in 2011-2012) is 

expected to be $60,000-$80,000 (diesel). 

• Option (6): Total cost for distribution centers is $1,500-$7,000/plug at dock; 

$2,500-$9,000/plug in parking areas; $500-$2,000/adapter for trailers and TRUs. 

Total cost for truck stops is $6,000-$18,000/parking space; $3,000/truck modification.
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-9 March 2010

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion 

a) Heavy duty diesel trucks 

• Equipment order. 

• Equipment acquisition/installation. 

• Submittal of invoice to local agency for payment. 

• Scrappage of old truck or engine. 

b) Truck stop/distribution center electrification 

The equipment project schedule shall include, but is not limited to, the following 

milestones: 

• Completion and certification of any required CEQA documents. 

• Bid solicitation, evaluation and award, and construction contract. 

• Acquisition of any local permits, or other requirements. 

• Electrification system design, unit acquisition, and delivery. 

• Project completion. 

• Post-inspection by the local agency. 

• Reporting to local agency of actual electrical use by trucks during first year of 

operation. 

• Submittal of invoice to local agency for reimbursement. 

C. Application Information 

Equipment owners shall provide the following information and documentation in addition 

to the requirements described in Chapter VI., and other information ARB or local 

agencies may request on the equipment project applications. The local agency shall 

enter the equipment application information into the Goods Movement Online Database. 

All equipment project applications must include the information specified below in: 

• Section 1 – General information. 

• Section 2 – Current equipment and activity information. 

• Section 3 – Proposed equipment project information. (Include information, as 

applicable, for each equipment project option). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-10 March 2010 

1. General information 

This section applies to all equipment project options. 

• Name or applicant (current owner of existing truck, including for potential lease-toown institutions). 

• Business name. 

• Mailing address. 

• Primary contact name and phone number. 

• Person with equipment contract signing authority (owner). 

• Proof of identity of current equipment owner (and lessor for lease-to-own). 

• Business information: 

o Fleet size (if applicable). 

o Number of employees. 

o Number of truck spaces (truck stops). 

o Number of docks (distribution centers). 

• A statement signed and dated by the current equipment owner acknowledging all 

application items are true/correct and there are no outstanding ARB violations on 

any equipment within the owner’s entire fleet. 

2. Current equipment and activity information 

a) Heavy duty diesel trucks 

• Truck data. 

o Truck make, model, and model year. 

o Vehicle Identification Number. 

o Declared GVW or CGW as shown on current DMV registration. 

o Gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR). 

o Vehicle license plate number. 

o Engine make, model, engine year, and serial number. 

o Engine horsepower and fuel type. 

o Current odometer reading (estimate total engine mileage if odometer is 

missing or broken). 

o Date a diesel particulate filter was previously installed on truck and verified 

control level of that filter (if applicable). 

• Truck documentation. 

o Current California registration including registered owner. 

o Registration showing California operation for the past 2 years or 8 months of 

available California DMV registration history supplemented by alternate 

documentation showing California operation for the past 2 years. 

o Documentation of current ownership (copy of title of truck) for any truck that 

will be scrapped or reused. This requirement does not apply to retrofit or 

repower projects. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-11 March 2010 

• Vocation and activity data for the past 2 years (unless noted otherwise). 

o Vocation(s) – the types of goods typically transported. 

o Drayage Truck Registry (DTR) status as of June 30, 2010. 

o Number of California port and rail yard visits (combined) in the past 12 

months. 

o Annual vehicle miles of travel (VMT) in California. 

o Estimated percentage of annual VMT in: 

 Bay Area trade corridor. 

 Central Valley trade corridor. 

 Los Angeles/Inland Empire trade corridor. 

 San Diego/Border trade corridor. 

o Documentation to verify reported VMT may be required. Examples of 

documentation include logbooks, fuel records, maintenance records, or tax 

records. 

o For concrete mixer trucks, dump trucks, and other truck types specifically 

identified by ARB staff, the owner may provide the Power Take Off (PTO) 

hours in conjunction with VMT: 

 Documentation from the hour meter unit is required. 

 PTO hours will be converted to miles based on factors supplied by 

ARB and combined with VMT in the calculation of emission reductions 

and cost-effectiveness. 

Additional documentation may be requested by the local agency. 

b) Truck stop/distribution center electrification 

• Location and description of facility where electrification infrastructure is proposed for 

installation. 

• Quantification of current annual truck operations and TRU operations at the facility. 

• Baseline emissions (without the project) for first 10 years of operation of proposed 

electrical infrastructure (developed with the concurrence of the local air district) – this 

emission estimate shall fully reflect the benefits of all adopted regulations including 

ARB rules for trucks, idling, auxiliary power systems, TRUs, and TRUs with 

generators sets. 

Additional documentation may be requested by the local agency. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-12 March 2010 

3. Proposed equipment project information

a) Heavy duty diesel trucks

(i) Option (1): PM retrofit 

• Retrofit device data. 

o ARB-verified retrofit device company and name of device. 

o ARB Executive Order number for retrofit device. 

o ARB-verified NOx reduction and PM reduction (percentages). 

• Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Total project cost. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Request for a direct payment to vendor (if applicable). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

(ii) Option (2): PM + NOx retrofit 

• Retrofit device data. 

o ARB-verified retrofit device company and name of device. 

o ARB Executive Order number for retrofit device. 

o ARB-verified NOx reduction and PM reduction (percentages). 

• Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Request for a direct payment to vendor (if applicable). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

(iii) Option (3): Repower 

• Engine repower data. 

o Engine make, engine model, and engine year. 

o Engine horsepower and fuel type. 

• Repower documentation. 

o Documentation of all engine/truck modifications planned as part of the 

repower project. Include description of upgrades to such things as exhaust 

systems, electronics, etc. 

• Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-13 March 2010 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Total project cost. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

(iv) Option (4): Replacement 

• New truck data. 

o Truck make, model, and model year. 

o Manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR).

o GVW or CGW that will be declared on the new DMV registration. 

o Engine make, engine model, and engine year. 

o Engine horsepower and fuel type. 

• Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Total project cost. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Request for a direct payment to vendor (if applicable). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

o Interest in lease-to-own option. 

(v) Option (5): Three-way truck transaction 

• Truck A (retrofitted truck) data. 

o ARB-verified retrofit device company and name of device. 

o ARB Executive Order number for retrofit device. 

o ARB-verified NOx reduction and PM reduction (percentages) 

o Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Total project cost. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Request for a direct payment to vendor (if applicable). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

• Truck C (new truck) Data 

o Truck make, model, and model year. 

o Manufacturer’s gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR).

o GVW or CGW that will be declared on the new DMV registration. 

o Engine make, engine model, and engine year. 

o Engine horsepower and fuel type. 

• Truck C itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-14 March 2010 

• Equipment project funding demonstration (combined Truck A and Truck C) 

o Total project cost. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Request for a direct payment to vendor (if applicable). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

b) Option (6): Truck stop/distribution center electrification 

• Electrification infrastructure information. 

o Project description and design, including number and location of electrification 

units to be installed, with individual and total power requirements. 

o Equipment vendor(s). 

o Itemized cost information by phase (e.g., design, environmental, 

construction). 

• Predicted activity data with new equipment. 

o Estimated annual truck connections to electric power and average connection 

time. 

o Estimated annual TRU connections to electrical power and average 

connection time. 

o Expected power usage for trucks and TRUs (separately), each year for the 

first 10 years of operation. 

• Projected emissions and benefits of the project. 

o Emissions with the project over a 10-year period. 

o Emission reductions attributable to the project (beyond those required by law 

or regulation) for a 10-year period beginning in the 1st year of operation. 

o Demonstration that the weighted emission reductions per State dollar 

invested is equal or better than 0.20 pounds per State dollar. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Funding sources and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, 

federal). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

D. Scrap Requirements 

In addition to the general scrappage requirements listed in Chapter IV.A.14., specific 

requirements for repower, replacement, and three-way truck transaction projects are 

shown in Table A.1 below. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-15 March 2010 

Table A.1 Truck Equipment Project Scrap Requirements 

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Heavy Duty 

Diesel Trucks 

Option (3) 

Repower 

• The local agency shall ensure the impound and transport 

of the old engine to the licensed dismantler within

30 calendar days of the new engine being placed into 

operation. 

• The licensed dismantler must dismantle and destroy the 

old engine within 60 calendar days of receipt. The

engine destruction must be done in accordance with 

these Guidelines. 

• The engine block shall be punctured and destroyed in 

such a manner to eliminate the possibility of future 

operation. 

• The licensed dismantler shall provide proof of scrappage 

to the local agency within 10 calendar days of the 

destruction of the engine. 

• The local agency or its designee must provide digital 

photographs, described below, showing the destruction 

of the old engine. The local agency must receive these 

photos within 10 calendar days of the engine being 

scrapped. 

• The following digital photos must be taken and labeled 

for the project file: 

1. Engine tag with serial number, engine family number, 

and engine model year. 

2. Destroyed engine block. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-16 March 2010 

Table A.1 Truck Equipment Project Scrap Requirements (cont.)

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Option (4) 

Replacement 

In addition to the requirements listed above for engine 

repower projects, replacement projects require: 

• The local agency shall ensure the impound and transport 

of the old truck to the dismantler within 30 calendar days 

of the replacement vehicle being placed into operation. 

• The licensed dismantler must dismantle and destroy the 

old truck within 60 calendar days of receipt. The 

destruction must be done in accordance with these 

Guidelines. 

• Sever the old vehicle frame rails to ensure that the 

vehicle is rendered useless and to prevent repeated use. 

• The following digital photos must be taken and labeled 

for the project file: 

1. Engine tag with serial number, engine family number, 

and engine model year. 

2. Destroyed engine block either inside or outside truck 

body. 

3. Vehicle Identification Number printed by 

manufacturer inside cab. 

4. Truck view from front angle capturing entire truck 

with readable license plate. 

• The equipment owner or licensed dismantler must file a 

VIN hold with DMV, and submit either REG 488C “NonRepairable Vehicle Certificate” or REG 42 “Notice to 

Dismantler,” to DMV, and submit a copy to the local

agency at the time of the post-inspection. Any additional 

substitute documentation must be verified by ARB to

ensure that the scrapped equipment is permanently 

removed from service. 

• The licensed dismantler shall provide proof of scrappage 

to the local agency within 10 calendar days of the 

destruction of the vehicle. 

Heavy Duty 

Diesel Trucks 

Option (5) 

Three-way 

Truck 

Transaction 

• Truck B (old truck) must be scrapped in accordance with 

the equipment project scrap requirements listed in 

Option 4. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-17 March 2010 

E. Post-Inspection 

• For truck replacement equipment projects, the post-inspection shall occur within 

60 calendar days of the old truck being delivered to a certified dismantler. 

• For truck retrofit equipment projects, the post-inspection shall occur within 

30 calendar days of installation of the fully operational equipment. 

• For truck stop/distribution equipment projects, the post-inspection shall occur within 

60 calendar days of owner receipt of fully operational equipment. 

Table A.2 Truck Post-Inspection Requirements 

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

PM Retrofit or 

PM + NOx 

Retrofit 

• Name, address, and telephone number of company(s) 

that installed the retrofit. 

• Name of the retrofit manufacturer(s). 

• Retrofit model and serial number(s). 

• Year that the retrofit was manufactured (if not listed on 

device label, information may be obtained from the 

retrofit manufacturer by reference to serial number). 

• Date the retrofit was installed. 

• If not in the application file, copy of ARB Executive 

Order documenting the retrofit meets the specifications. 

Heavy Duty 

Diesel Trucks 

Repower • Name, address, and telephone number of company(s) 

that installed the new engine. 

• Engine make, model, model year. 

• Engine family name and number. 

• Engine serial number. 

• Date the new engine was installed. 

• If not in the application file, copy of ARB Executive 

Order documenting that the new engine meets 

MY2010 emissions. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-18 March 2010 

Table A.2 Truck Post-Inspection Requirements (cont.)

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Replacement • Vehicle type. 

• Vehicle identification number (VIN). 

• Vehicle make, model, model year. 

• Combined Gross Vehicle Weight (CGW). 

• Fuel type. 

• Vehicle license plate number (for a new vehicle, owner 

shall provide license plate number upon receipt from the 

DMV). 

• CA Highway Patrol number. 

• Engine make, model year, engine year. 

• Engine family name and number. 

• If not in the application file, copy of ARB Executive 

Order documenting that the replacement truck engine

meets MY2010 emissions or MY2007 emissions, as 

applicable. 

Three-way 

Truck 

Transaction 

* See individual post inspection requirements for retrofit 

and replacement.

Heavy Duty 

Diesel Trucks 

Truck Stop/ 

Distribution 

Center 

• Name of power system manufacturer. 

• Serial number and date of manufacture. 

• Rated amperage, voltage. 

• Verification that each project’s pedestal and/or external 

air conditioning/power system is operational. 

• Inspection shall include verification of operation by 

connecting heavy duty truck cab and/or transport 

refrigeration unit (as appropriate) to a random number 

of pedestals or external air conditioning/power system. 

• Inspections: 

o An initial inspection shall be completed within 

60 calendar days of owner receipt of fully 

operational equipment. 

 The initial inspection shall include a review of 

equipment owner’s procedures to collect use 

data for first year of operation. 

o A second inspection (which corresponds to the 

proper post-inspection) shall be completed within 

60 calendar days of owner completion of first year of 

operation. 

 Reimbursement of equipment costs can only be 

requested after obtaining a satisfactory second 

inspection.
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-19 March 2010 

F. Recordkeeping Requirements 

Equipment owners shall retain, at a minimum, all documents, invoices, and 

correspondence associated with the application award, contract, purchase, installation, 

equipment operation (and if applicable, registration, insurance, and warranty), and 

reporting for at least 2 years after the end of the equipment project contact term or 

3 years after final payment, whichever is later. Records shall be readily available and 

accessible to the local agency, ARB, or ARB designee upon request for the purposes of 

ongoing evaluations or audits. 

G. Annual Reporting Requirements 

a) Heavy duty diesel trucks

Equipment owners shall be responsible for annual reporting to the local agency except 

for owners with PM retrofits with a 2-year contract who only need to report at the end of 

the 2 year project life. The equipment owner shall submit annual reports for the 

equipment project life. The equipment owner’s annual report shall include, but is not 

limited to: 

• Contact information (owner name, address, phone, etc.). 

• Proof of California registration. 

• Proof of insurance. 

• Current odometer reading (estimate total vehicle mileage if odometer is missing or 

broken). 

• Annual VMT since last report. 

• Certification of the required 90 percent or 100 percent California-only operation. 

Certification of at least 50 percent of travel in the four trade corridors as well as 

provide the percentage of annual vehicle miles of travel in: 

o Bay Area trade corridor. 

o Central Valley trade corridor. 

o Los Angeles/Inland Empire trade corridor. 

o San Diego/Border trade corridor. 

• Summary of maintenance performed and inspections conducted. 

• Certification that the bond-funded project was operated in accordance with the 

signed contract, and that all information submitted is true and accurate. 

• Other information as requested by the local agency. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix A. Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks A-20 March 2010 

b) Truck stop/distribution center electrification 

Equipment owners shall be responsible for annual reporting to the local agency for the 

project life. The equipment owner annual report shall include, but is not limited to: 

• Contact information (owner name, company, address, phone). 

• Facility location.

• Project completion date.

• Monthly truck and TRU connections to electrical power and electricity usage for each 

month in the reporting year. 

• Summary of maintenance and inspections conducted. 

• Signed certification statement that the bond-funded project was installed and is 

operating as it was approved in the post-inspection and that all information 

submitted to the local agency is true and accurate.

• Other information as requested by the local agency.
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-1 March 2010 

APPENDIX B Locomotives and Rail Yards 

A. Equipment Project Specifications 

Locomotives and Rail Yards 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Locomotive projects:

Diesel-powered freight locomotives with no or minimal emissions control technology 

(i.e., uncontrolled, or meeting Tier 0 or Tier 1 standards). 

Equipment owner must demonstrate: 

• Operation or equivalent locomotive horsepower operation in California for the past 

2 years. 

• At least 50% operation or equivalent locomotive horsepower operation within trade 

corridor(s) for the past 2 years. 

• Estimated diesel fuel usage of 20,000 gallons per year or greater. 

Equipment owners participating in a 90% California operation option may compete at a 

funding level that is 20% less than the applicable funding option shown below, and must 

do the following at their own expense: (1) install an approved, active GPS system in the 

funded locomotive; (2) pay for monthly electronic service for the project life; and (3) 

provide electronic monitoring and activity reports when requested by the local agency or 

ARB, in the format defined by ARB staff. 

Rail yard projects:

Existing freight rail yards in a trade corridor. 

General 

Requirements 

(applicable to 

all project 

options) 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to the project life specified with the applicable equipment project option. 

• Adhere to all Program Requirements during the project life. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and insurance on upgraded equipment. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB violations associated with the equipment or 

owner. 

• Exclude any program-funded equipment from the compliance calculations for the 

1998 agreement for Locomotives in the South Coast Air Basin for the duration of the 

project life (applicable to UP and BNSF only). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-2 March 2010 

Locomotives and Rail Yards (cont.)

Option (1): 

Switcher 

Locomotive 

(1,006 hp -

2,300 hp) 

Partial funding (see options below) to replace, repower, or rebuild an uncontrolled, Tier 

0, or Tier 1 switcher locomotive with a new generator-set, hybrid or alternative 

technology. 

Funding 

Options 

1. The lower of 50% of the eligible cost or $750,000/locomotive to meet emission limits 

of 3.5 g/bhp-hr or less for NOx, and 0.10 g/bhp-hr or less for PM. 

2. $1,000,000/locomotive to meet U.S. EPA Tier 4 or lower emission standards for 

NOx only or PM only. 

3. $1,200,000/locomotive to meet U.S. EPA Tier 4 or lower emission standards for 

both NOx and PM. 

Eligible costs include a new chassis, freshly manufactured engine(s), diesel PM filter, 

selective catalytic reduction device for NOx control, and mechanical/electrical systems 

components necessary for safe operation. 

Ineligible costs include auto start/stop devices required by regulation or agreements, 

GPS units and associated monitoring and reporting costs, design, engineering, 

consulting, license, registration, taxes, insurance, operation, maintenance, and repair. 

Requirements The new equipment must meet the required emission levels or standards as evidenced 

by an ARB verified U.S. EPA engine certification test results (funding Option 1 only) or a 

U.S. EPA Certificate of Conformity (funding Options 1, 2, or 3) under the switcher dutycycle. 

In addition to the General Requirements, equipment owner shall: 

• Be permitted to have equipment temporarily travel out-of-state for periodic 

maintenance if outlined in the contract between the local agency and equipment 

owner. 

• Commit to a project life of 15 years. 

• Commit to 90% or 100% operation within the four California trade corridors for the 

duration of the project life. 

• Scrap or ban old engine/locomotive from California operation. 

• Install an active GPS unit on both old (if not scrapped) and new equipment, fund 

data collection, and report location data. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-3 March 2010 

Locomotives and Rail Yards (cont.)

Option (2): 

(Medium 

Horsepower) 

Line-haul 

Locomotive 

(2,301 hp -

4,000 hp) 

Partial funding (see options below) to replace, repower, or rebuild an uncontrolled, Tier 

0, or Tier 1 line-haul locomotive with a new engine or alternative technology. 

Funding 

Options 

1. The lower of 50% of the eligible cost or $750,000/locomotive to meet emission limits 

of 4.0 g/bhp-hr or less for NOx, and 0.10 g/bhp-hr or less for PM. 

2. $1,000,000/locomotive to meet U.S. EPA Tier 4 or lower emission standards for 

NOx only or PM only. 

3. $1,500,000/locomotive to meet U.S. EPA Tier 4 or lower emission standards for both 

NOx and PM. 

Eligible costs include a new chassis, freshly manufactured or rebuilt engine(s), diesel PM 

filter, selective catalytic reduction device for NOx control, other emission control 

equipment, and new or upgraded mechanical/electrical/control system components 

necessary for safe operation. 

Ineligible costs include auto start/stop devices required by regulation or agreements, 

GPS units and associated monitoring and reporting costs, design, engineering, 

consulting, license, registration, taxes, insurance, operation, maintenance, and repair. 

Requirements The new equipment must meet the required emission levels or standards as evidenced 

by an ARB verified U.S. EPA engine certification test results (funding Option 1 only) or a 

U.S. EPA Certificate of Conformity (funding Options 1, 2 or 3) under the line-haul dutycycle. 

In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Be permitted to have equipment temporarily travel out-of-state for periodic 

maintenance if outlined in the contract between the local agency and equipment 

owner. 

• Commit to a project life of 15 years. 

• Commit to 90% or 100% California-only operation for the duration of the project life. 

The funded intrastate line-haul locomotive shall use California ARB diesel fuel. 

• Commit to at least 50% of operation within the four California trade corridors for 

duration of the project life. 

• Scrap or ban old engine/locomotive from California operation. 

• Install an active GPS unit on both old (if not scrapped) and new equipment, fund 

data collection, and report location data. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-4 March 2010 

Locomotives and Rail Yards (cont.)

Option (3): 

Line-Haul 

Locomotive 

(4,001 hp or 

higher) 

Partial funding (see options below) to replace, repower, or rebuild an uncontrolled, Tier 

0, or Tier 1 line-haul locomotive with a new engine or alternative technology. 

Funding 

Options 

1. The lower of 50% of the eligible cost or $1,200,000/locomotive to meet U.S. EPA 

Tier 3 or lower emission standards for both NOx and PM through use of a Tier 3 

engine or Tier 2 engine with certified “Tier 2 Plus” kit. 

2. $1,500,000/locomotive to meet U.S. EPA Tier 4 or lower emission standards for 

NOx only or PM only. 

3. $2,000,000/locomotive to meet U.S. EPA Tier 4 or lower emission standards for both 

NOx and PM. 

Eligible costs include a new chassis, freshly manufactured or rebuilt engine(s), new 

Tier 2 engine(s), a U.S. EPA Certified “Tier 2 Plus” retrofit kit, new generator set(s), 

diesel PM filter, selective catalytic reduction device for NOx control, other emission 

control equipment, and new or upgraded mechanical/electrical/control system 

components necessary for safe operation. 

Ineligible costs include auto start/stop devices required by regulation or agreements, 

GPS units and associated monitoring and reporting costs, design, engineering, 

consulting, license, registration, taxes, insurance, operation, maintenance, and repair. 

Requirements The new equipment must meet the required emission standards as evidenced by a 

U.S. EPA Certificate of Conformity under the line-haul duty-cycle. Any equipment project 

which utilizes a “Tier 2 Plus” retrofit kit must have the post-inspection completed (except 

scrappage) by December 31, 2012. 

In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Be permitted to have equipment temporarily travel out-of-state for periodic 

maintenance if outlined in the contract between the local agency and equipment 

owner. 

• Commit to a project life of 15 years. 

• Commit to 90% or 100% California-only operation for the duration of the project life. 

The funded intrastate line-haul locomotive shall use California ARB diesel fuel. 

• Commit to at least 50% of operation within the four California trade corridors for the 

duration of the project life. 

• Scrap or ban old engine/locomotive from California operation. 

• Install an active GPS unit on both old (if not scrapped) and new equipment, fund 

data collection, and report location data. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Estimated total cost of new switcher generator-set is ~$1.5-$2 million. 

• Estimated cost for a line-haul repower is ~$1-$2 million. 

• Estimated total cost of a new line-haul locomotive is ~$2-$3 million. 

• Estimated cost of a “Tier 2 Plus” retrofit device kit is ~$250,000. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-5 March 2010 

Locomotives and Rail Yards (cont.)

Option (4): 

Locomotive 

Emissions 

Capture and 

Control 

System 

Partial funding for the lower of 50% of eligible costs or a level commensurate with a costeffectiveness of at least 0.15 lbs/State dollar for the purchase and installation of an ARBapproved locomotive emission capture and control system (a.k.a. hood or bonnet) to 

reduce diesel PM and NOx emissions from freight locomotives. 

Eligible costs include purchase and installation of the emission treatment system and 

ducting, and hoods or bonnets necessary to connect to locomotives. 

Ineligible costs include those associated with increasing the capacity of electrical power 

to the facility, locomotive modifications to accept capture and control system, locomotive 

or other acquisition and modification for a portable system, design, engineering, 

consulting, environmental review, legal fees, permits, licenses and associated fees, 

taxes, utility construction or metered costs, insurance, operation, maintenance, and 

repair. 

Requirements In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to a project life of 10 years. 

• Commit to 90% or 100% operation within the four California trade corridors for the 

duration of the project life. 

• Document the system is commercially available and achieves an overall capture and 

control efficiency rate of at least 85% for the removal of NOx and PM. 

• Demonstrate system performance and efficiency with source testing prior to funding 

and annually thereafter by capturing emissions from an operating locomotive 

undergoing diagnostic procedures. Performance measures include: (i) no visible 

emissions after bonnet is connected to the locomotive (opacity <20%); and (ii) 

establish overall system efficiency rate is at least 85% using ARB approved methods 

for flow rate (Methods 1 to 4), NOx (ARB Method 100) and PM (ARB Method 5). Any 

alternative test methods must be approved by ARB. 

• Obtain a 10-year manufacturer’s warranty (including labor and materials) to repair 

and/or replace system component(s) as needed to correct any mechanical, electrical 

or control system equipment or installation problems which may cause significant 

loss of capture, treatment efficiency or usability. The manufacturer’s warranty may 

exclude minor items that are subject to normal wear and tear if approved by ARB. 

• Comply with all local permitting requirements. 

Excluded 

Funding 

Components 

• Electricity costs required to operate the hood control system. 

• Other operation and maintenance costs. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Estimated total cost of new switcher generator-set is ~$1.5-$2 million. 

• Estimated cost for a line-haul repower is ~$1-$2 million. 

• Estimated total cost of a new line-haul locomotive is ~$2-$3 million. 

• Estimated cost of a “Tier 2 Plus” retrofit device kit is ~$250,000. 

• Estimated capital cost for the locomotive emissions capture and control system of 

one 12,500 scfm unit with 12 bonnets is ~$9 million. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-6 March 2010 

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion 

• Equipment order. 

• Equipment acquisition/installation. 

• Submittal of invoice to local agency for reimbursement. 

C. Application Information 

• Equipment owners shall provide the following information and documentation in 

addition to the requirements described in Chapter VI., and other information ARB or 

local agencies may request on the equipment project applications. 

• UP and BNSF must certify that any locomotive that would operate in the South Coast 

Air Basin will be excluded from the railroads fleet average emissions calculations 

under the 1998 agreement.

1. General information 

This section applies to all equipment project options. 

• Organization/agency/company name. 

• Railroad Class (1, 2, or 3). 

• Mailing address. 

• Primary contact name and phone number. 

• Person with equipment contract signing authority (owner). 

• Proof of identity of equipment owner. 

• Business information. 

o Number of locomotives. 

o Number of employees. 

2. Current equipment and activity information 

a) Switcher and line-haul equipment project options

• Existing locomotive information. 

o Locomotive type (diesel/electric, alternative technology). 

o Build number, build date. 

o Builder. 

o Locomotive make, model, serial number. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-7 March 2010 

o Engine data (per engine). 

 Modifications (roots blown, turbo-charged, other).

 Emission control level (uncontrolled, Tier 0, or Tier 1). 

 Engine family, make and type, model, engine year. 

 Serial number. 

 Horsepower. 

 Number of cylinders. 

 Fuel type. 

o Electronic monitoring unit device type and model (if equipped). 

• Ownership. 

o Documentation of current ownership. 

• Activity data for the past 2 years (for existing unit or units of comparable horsepower 

and function). 

o Annual fuel consumption (gallons of fuel). 

o Annual megawatt hours of operation. 

• Activity documentation for past 2 years (for existing unit or units of comparable 

horsepower and function). 

o Documentation of at least 50 percent of operation in trade corridors. 

o Identify the trade corridors in which the equipment is routinely operated. 

o Documentation of fuel consumption. 

o Documentation of megawatt hours of operation. 

o ARB staff shall post on the Program website additional instructions for 

applicants demonstrating eligibility based on units of comparable horsepower 

and function. 

b) Locomotive emissions and capture control system for rail 

yards

• Facility location. 

o Address of rail yard where technology will be installed. 

o Description and area map of rail yard facility where system is proposed for 

installation. 

• Rail yard activity. 

o Quantification of current annual locomotive maintenance and diagnostic 

operations at the area within facility where infrastructure is proposed. 

o Number and type of units being serviced. 

 For each type of unit being serviced, provide average time spent in 

idling and on each notch level while being serviced or in diagnostics. 

• Baseline emissions (without the project in place) for the 10 years of operation of the 

system. This baseline should reflect the benefits of all adopted regulations, MOU 

agreements, and any other enforceable agreements. 

Additional documentation may be requested by the local agency. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-8 March 2010 

3. Proposed equipment project information 

a) Switcher locomotive 

• New switcher data. 

o Locomotive type (diesel-electric, gen-set, alternative technology). 

o Builder name. 

o Locomotive make. 

o Locomotive family name. 

o U.S. EPA engine certification test results for switcher duty cycle with ARB 

verification (PM and NOx in g/bhp-hr). 

o Engine data (per engine). 

 Modifications (roots blown, turbo-charged, other).

 Engine family, make and engine year. 

 Horsepower. 

 Number of cylinders. 

 For new switcher gen-sets, provide the number of engines, and each 

engine horsepower and kilowatts-hour. 

 Fuel type. 

o Electronic monitoring device unit type and a description or sample of the 

type/format of reportable data. 

• Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

o Locomotive, engine, or generator set (as applicable). 

o Other equipment/materials. 

• Predicted activity data with new equipment. 

o Estimated annual fuel consumption (gallons of fuel). 

o Estimated annual megawatt hours of operation. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Funding sources and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, 

federal). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

b) Line-haul locomotive 

• New locomotive or engine data. 

o Locomotive type (diesel-electric, gen-set, alternative technology). 

o Builder name. 

o Locomotive make. 

o Emission rates certified by U.S. EPA and verified by ARB for line-haul duty 

cycle (PM and NOx in g/bhp-hr). 

o Engine data (per engine). 

 Modifications (roots blown, turbo-charged, other).

 Engine family, make and engine year. 

 Horsepower. 

 Number of cylinders. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail Yards B-9 March 2010 

 For new gen-sets, provide the number of engines and each engine 

horsepower and kilowatts-hour. 

 Fuel type. 

o Electronic monitoring device unit type and a description or sample of the 

type/format of reportable data. 

• Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

o Locomotive or engine (as applicable). 

o Other equipment/materials. 

• Predicted activity data with new equipment. 

o Estimated annual fuel consumption (gallons of fuel). 

o Estimated annual megawatt hours of operation. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Funding sources and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, 

federal). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

c) Locomotive emissions capture and control system 

• Project description and design, including: 

o Number of emissions capture systems (bonnets) per unit. 

o Number of emissions treatment systems. 

o Support structure. 

o Emissions overhead manifold. 

• Emission control equipment data. 

o Equipment vendor(s). 

o Documentation of percent PM and NOx emission reductions. 

• Itemized cost for each eligible expense. 

• Predicted locomotive activity data with new system over project life. 

o Number and type of locomotive units using the hood. 

o Average time locomotives will spend under the hood idling and in notches 1-8 

for each unit type identified above. 

o Power usage to run the system and source of power (grid- vs. non-gridbased). 

o Natural gas usage (if any) for heating SCR duct burner. 

• Projected emissions and benefits with the project.

o Emissions with the project over 10 years of operation. 

o Emission reductions attributable to the project (beyond those required by any 

law, regulation, or enforceable agreements) for 10 years. 

o Demonstration that the weighted emission reductions are equal to or higher 

than 0.15 pounds per State dollar invested. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Total project cost. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Funding sources and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, 

federal). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail YardsB-10 March 2010 

D. Scrap Requirements 

In addition to the general scrappage requirements listed in Chapter IV.A.14., specific 

requirements for locomotive repower and replacement projects are shown in Table B.1 

below. 

Table B.1 Locomotive Equipment Project Scrap Requirements 

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Locomotives Project Options 

(1), (2) or (3) 

Repower or 

Replacement 

• The local agency shall ensure the impound and transport of 

the old engine(s) to the licensed dismantler within

30 calendar days of the new engine(s) being placed into 

operation. 

• The licensed dismantler must dismantle and destroy the old 

engine(s) within 60 calendar days of receipt. The engine 

destruction must be done in accordance with these 

Guidelines. 

• The engine block shall be punctured and destroyed in such a 

manner to eliminate the possibility of future operation. 

• The licensed dismantler shall provide proof of scrappage to 

the local agency within 10 calendar days of the destruction of 

the engine. 

• The local agency or its designee must provide digital 

photographs, described below, showing the destruction of the 

old engine. The local agency must receive these photos 

within 10 calendar days of the engine being scrapped. 

• The following digital photos must be taken and labeled for the 

project file: 

1. Engine serial number either stamped on the block or on 

the tag. 

2. Destroyed engine block. 

E. Alternative to Scrapping 

If the equipment owner has elected to ban the old locomotive or locomotive engine from 

future operations in California, the equipment owner shall demonstrate to the local 

agency’s satisfaction that the following requirements are met for the duration of the 

contract: 

• An active GPS device has been installed in the old equipment. 

• The GPS devise is fully operational and can be easily tracked. 

• Provide local agency the GPS manufacturer’s name, date of manufacture, and serial 

number of device. 

• If old engine or old locomotive is remanufactured, equipment owner must provide 

remanufacturing date, remanufacturer’s name, and sufficient information to identify 

remanufactured engine and, if applicable, remanufactured locomotive, including 

changes to emissions levels. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail YardsB-11 March 2010 

• If old equipment is sold, new owner must assume GPS tracking and reporting 

responsibilities. 

• Data collection is fully funded by equipment owner. 

• Report old unit future locations to local agency in the manner indicated in contract. 

The old equipment, equipped with the GPS, shall be removed from California within 

60 calendar days of receiving the fully operational upgraded equipment. 

F. Post-Inspection 

In addition to the general post-inspection requirements in Chapter IV.A.16., specific 

requirements for locomotive post-inspections are shown in Table B.2 below. 

• For locomotive projects, the post-inspection shall occur within 60 days of owner 

receipt of fully operational equipment. 

Table B.2 Locomotive Post-Inspection Requirements

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project 

Option 

Additional Requirements 

Option (1), 

(2), and (3) 

Switcher and 

Line-Haul 

Locomotives 

• Locomotive engine must be operated under its own 

power under loaded conditions. 

• Engine make, model, engine year, and serial number

for repower and replacement projects. 

• Start and end dates of when locomotive was 

repowered. 

• Name and address of company that repowered the 

locomotive engine. 

Locomotives 

Option (4) 

Locomotive 

Emissions 

Capture and 

Control 

System 

• Verify that source testing demonstrates the required 

capture and control efficiency. 

• The fully operational system must be connected to an 

operating locomotive and complying with performance

measures stated in the specification. 

G. Recordkeeping Requirements 

Equipment owners shall retain, at a minimum, all documents, invoices, and 

correspondence associated with the application, award, contract, purchase, installation, 

equipment operation (and if applicable, registration, insurance, and warranty), and 

reporting for at least 2 years after the end of the equipment project contact term or 

3 years after final payment, whichever is later. Records shall be readily available and 

accessible to the local agency, ARB, or ARB designee upon request for the purposes of 

ongoing evaluations or audits. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix B. Locomotives and Rail YardsB-12 March 2010 

H. Annual Reporting Requirements 

Equipment owners shall be responsible for annual reporting to the local agency that 

includes, but is not limited to: 

 

1. Annual reporting for switcher and line-haul locomotives 

• Contact information (owner name, company, address, phone). 

• Build number, date, builder, builder model. 

• Date of equipment installation. 

• Locomotive type and name of home rail yard. 

• Annual megawatt-hours of operation, and fuel consumed since last report. 

• Representative profile data to determine engine duty cycle. 

• Certification of California-only operation. 

• Summary of maintenance performed (including location) and inspections conducted. 

• GPS data in a usable format. 

• Certification and documentation of 90 percent or 100 percent of travel in trade 

corridors for switcher locomotives, and 50 percent operation in trade corridors for 

line-haul locomotives. 

• The percentage of annual travel in each trade corridor: 

o Bay Area trade corridor. 

o Central Valley trade corridor. 

o Los Angeles/Inland Empire trade corridor. 

o San Diego trade corridor. 

• Certification that the bond-funded project was used in accordance with the signed 

contract and that all information submitted is true and accurate. 

• Other information as requested by ARB or the local agency. 

2. Annual reporting for locomotive emissions capture and 

control system 

• Contact information (owner name, company, address, phone). 

• Description of locomotive emissions capture and control system. 

• Rail yard name/identifier. 

• Date and location of equipment installation. 

• Total hours the equipment operated while connected to an operating locomotive 

over the reporting period. 

• Total number of locomotives connected to the system over the reporting period. 

• Estimated average locomotive engine size (in horsepower) connected to the system. 

• Power usage to run the hood and source of power (grid or generator). 

• Natural gas usage (if any) for heating SCR duct burner. 

• Summary of maintenance, source testing and inspections conducted. 

• Signed certification statement that the bond-funded project was operated in 

accordance with signed contract and that all information submitted is true and 

accurate. 

• Other information as requested by the local agency or ARB. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-1 March 2010 

APPENDIX C Ships at Berth 

A. Equipment Project Specifications

Ships at Berth 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Existing cargo ship berth or existing cargo ship terminal at a seaport located in a trade 

corridor. 

General 

Requirements 

(applicable to 

all project 

options) 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to the project life specified with the applicable equipment project option. 

• Adhere to all Program Requirements during the project life. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency and the port (if not the same entity) 

including project milestone and completion deadlines. 

• If the equipment owner is also the local agency administering the grant, the local 

agency must sign a legally binding contract with ARB including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain all equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and insurance on new equipment. 

• Comply with local permitting requirements. 

Option (1) 

Grid-Based 

Power 

Partial funding up to the lower of 50% of eligible shore-side costs to install permanent, gridbased electrical power at a cargo ship berth or: 

(1) $3,500,000/berth for completed projects that begin operation by January 2012. 

(2) $3,000,000/berth for completed projects that begin operation by January 2013. 

(3) $2,500,000/berth for completed projects that begin operation by January 2014. 

Eligible costs include design, engineering, equipment necessary to purchase and install 

infrastructure to supply electrical power, utility construction, and costs associated with 

increasing the capacity of electrical power to the port. 

Ineligible costs include shipside modifications to accept shore-based electrical power, 

consulting, environmental review, legal fees, permits, licenses and associated fees, taxes, 

metered costs, insurance, operation, maintenance, and repair. 

Requirements In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to a project life of 10 years for the use of grid-based shore power at the berth 

at the following levels or greater: 

o 50% of the ship visits in 2012-2013 (if applicable). 

o 60% of the ship visits in 2014-2016. 

o 80% of the ship visits in 2017-2019. 

o 90% of the ship visits in 2020 and beyond. 

• Demonstrate operability with a cargo ship fully powered by shore-based electrical 

power supplied by the grid-based equipment. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-2 March 2010 

Ships at Berth (cont.)

Option (2) 

Non-GridBased Power 

Partial funding of up to $200,000 per megawatt of the eligible costs of an electricity 

generating unit that provides power at a cargo ship berth or multiple berths. This unit can 

be portable or fixed on the terminal. Only zero emission units (e.g., fuel cell, solar), or 

natural gas engines equipped with selective catalytic reduction to control NOx emissions 

are eligible. 

Eligible costs include equipment necessary to generate electrical power and connect the 

equipment to cargo ships at berth. 

Ineligible costs include construction and protection of infrastructure (e.g., natural gas lines) 

used to supply fuel for non-grid-based electrical generation, shipside modifications to 

accept electrical power, barge or other acquisition and modification for a portable system, 

design, engineering, consulting, environmental review, legal fees, permits, licenses and 

associated fees, taxes, utility construction or metered costs, insurance, operation, 

maintenance, and repair. 

Requirements In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to a project life of 5 years of 100% California operation at the following levels or 

greater: 

o Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach: 

 2,000 hours per year in 2012-2013. 

 3,000 hours per year in 2014 and beyond. 

o All other ports in the four trade corridors: 

 1,000 hours per year in 2012-2013. 

 1,500 hours per year in 2014 and beyond. 

• Demonstrate operability with a cargo ship fully powered by shore-based electrical power 

supplied by the electricity generating unit. 

• Obtain a 5 year manufacturer’s warranty which includes labor and materials to repair 

and/or replace system component(s) as needed to correct any mechanical, electrical or 

control system equipment or installation problems resulting in significant loss of 

usability. The manufacturer’s warranty may exclude minor items that are subject to 

normal wear and tear if approved by ARB. 

• Perform source testing to measure emissions from the unit every 1,000 hours of 

operation, according to the source test requirements contained in ARB’s Ships at Berth 

Rule. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-3 March 2010 

Ships at Berth (cont.)

Option (3) 

Ship 

Emissions 

Capture and 

Control 

System 

Partial funding of up to the lower of 50% of the eligible costs or a level commensurate with 

a cost-effectiveness of at least 1.0 lbs/State dollar for the purchase and installation of a 

ship emissions capture and control system (a.k.a. hood or bonnet) to reduce diesel PM and 

NOx emissions at 85% from ships at berth. Only units that have ARB-approved capture 

and treatment efficiency rates for PM and NOx consistent with ARB’s Ships At-Berth Rule 

are eligible for funding. 

Requirements Eligible costs include purchase and installation of the emission treatment system and 

ducting, and hoods or bonnets necessary to connect to cargo ships at berth. 

Ineligible costs include shipside modifications to accept capture and control system, barge 

or other acquisition and modification for a portable system, design, engineering, consulting, 

environmental review, legal fees, permits, licenses and associated fees, taxes, utility 

construction or metered costs, insurance, operation, maintenance, and repair. 

In addition to the General Requirements listed previously, equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to a project life of 10 years of 100% California operation at the following levels 

or greater: 

o Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach: 

 2,000 hours per year in 2012-2013. 

 3,000 hours per year in 2014-2016. 

 4,000 hours per year in 2017-2019. 

 4,500 hours per year in 2020 and beyond. 

o All other ports in the four trade corridors: 

 1,000 hours per year in 2012–2013. 

 1,500 hours per year in 2014-2016. 

 2,000 hours per year in 2017-2019. 

 2,500 hours per year in 2020 and beyond. 

• Commit to 100% operation within the four California trade corridors for the duration of 

the project life. 

• Document the system is commercially available and achieves an overall efficiency rate 

of at least 85% for the capture and removal of NOx and PM. 

• Demonstrate system performance and efficiency with source testing prior to funding 

and annually thereafter by capturing emissions from a cargo ship at port. Performance 

measures include: (i) no visible emissions after bonnet is connected to the locomotive 

(opacity <20%); and (ii) establish overall system efficiency rate is at least 85% using 

ARB approved methods for flow rate (Methods 1 to 4), NOx (ARB Method 100) and PM 

(ARB Method 5). Any alternative test methods must be approved by ARB. 

• Obtain a 10 year manufacturer’s warranty (including labor and materials) to repair 

and/or replace system component(s) as needed to correct any mechanical, electrical or 

control system equipment or installation problems which may cause significant loss of 

capture, treatment efficiency or usability. The manufacturer’s warranty may exclude 

minor items that are subject to normal wear and tear if approved by ARB. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-4 March 2010 

Ships at Berth (cont.)

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Option (1): Total shore-side cost of equipping a berth with permanent grid-based 

electrical power is ~$3-$5 million/berth; some ports may incur higher costs to bring 

new/additional power capacity to the port that may increase the total cost to 

$5-$7 million/berth. 

• Option (2): Total cost of distributed generation power is anticipated to be 

$4 million/2 MW unit. 

• Options (1,2): Shipside modifications will cost ~$500,000-$1 million/ship. 

• Option (3): Ship emissions capture and control system estimated capital cost is 

approximately $6 million for the current standard design of one 12,500 scfm unit with 

single bonnet. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-5 March 2010 

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion

• Preliminary design. 

• Environmental clearance (if applicable). 

• Final design. 

• Equipment acquisition (if applicable). 

• Construction bid award. 

• Construction completion/equipment installation. 

• Submittal of invoice to local agency for reimbursement. 

C. Application Information

Equipment owners shall provide the following information and documentation in addition 

to the requirements described in Chapter VI., and other information ARB or local 

agencies may request on the equipment project applications. 

1. General information 

This section applies to all equipment project options. 

• Organization/agency/company name. 

• Mailing address. 

• Primary contact name and phone number. 

• Person(s) with equipment contract signing authority (owner). 

• Proof of identity of equipment owner. 

2. Current equipment and activity information

Not applicable

3. Proposed equipment project information 

a) Grid-based shore power 

• Project Information. 

o Port where the berth is located. 

o Berth name/identifier and location within port. 

o Owner and operator of berth. 

o Project description, design, maximum power demand (kWh-hr). 

o Itemized cost information by phase (e.g., design, environmental, 

construction). 

• Berth activity data for the past 2 years. 

o Number of ship visits to the berth. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-6 March 2010 

• Ship information (per ship). 

o Number of visits per year. 

o Average hotelling time per visit (hours/visit). 

o Ship type, size (e.g., twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) capacity), description 

(e.g., number of engines, fuel type), power demand (total auxiliary power 

(kW), net hotelling load (kW)). 

• Predicted berth activity data with new equipment. 

o Estimated annual ship visits using electrical power. 

o Estimated ship types, description, power demands. 

o Estimated monthly hours of operation. 

o Estimated monthly MW usage. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Funding sources and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, 

federal). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

b) Non-grid-based shore power 

• Project Information. 

o Port where the berths are located. 

o Berth(s) name/identifier and location within port.

o Owner and operator of berth. 

o Project description, design, maximum power demand (megawatts). 

o Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

• Berth activity data for the past 2 years (per berth). 

o Number of ship visits to the berth. 

• Ship information (per ship). 

• Number of visits per year. 

o Average hotelling time per visit (hours/visit). 

o Ship type, size (e.g., TEU capacity), description (e.g., number of engines, fuel 

type), power demand (total auxiliary power (kW)), net hotelling load (kW)). 

• Predicted activity data with new equipment. 

o Estimated annual ship visits using electrical power. 

o Estimated ship types, description, power demands. 

o Estimated monthly hours of operation. 

o Estimated monthly MW usage. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Funding sources and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, 

federal). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-7 March 2010 

c) Ship emissions capture and control system 

• Project description and design, including: 

o Number of emissions capture subsystems (bonnets) per unit. 

o Number of emissions treatment subsystems. 

o Support structure. 

o Any other components (ducts, etc.). 

• Emission control equipment data. 

o Equipment vendor(s). 

o Documentation of percent PM and NOx emission reductions. 

• Itemized cost for each eligible expense. 

• Predicted ship activity data with new system over project life (per ship type). 

o Number and type of ships under the hood. 

o Average time ships will spend under the hood. 

o Power usage (kWh) to run the system and source of power (grid- vs. 

non-grid-based). 

o Natural gas usage (if any) for heating SCR duct burner. 

• Projected emissions and benefits with the project.

o Emissions with and without the project over 10 years of operation. 

o Emission reductions attributable to the project (beyond those required by any 

law or regulation) for 10 years. 

o Demonstration that the weighted emission reductions are equal to or higher 

than 1.0 pounds per State dollar invested. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Total project cost. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Funding sources and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, 

federal). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-8 March 2010 

D. Post Inspection 

Table D.1 Ships at Berth Post-Inspection Requirements 

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project 

Option 

Additional Requirements 

Option (1) 

Grid-Based 

Shore Power 

• A ship must be plugged into shore power at the 

designated berth, with the engines turned off, and 

drawing power to demonstrate to the inspector that it is 

in proper working order. 

• Verification that this project serves the intended berth(s). 

Option (2) 

Non-GridBased Shore 

Power 

• Ship must be plugged into shore power at the 

designated berth, with the engines turned off, and 

drawing power to demonstrate to the inspector that it is 

in proper working order. 

• Verification that this project serves the intended berth(s). 

Ships at Berth 

Option (3) 

Ship 

Emissions 

Capture and 

Control 

System 

• The fully operational system must be connected to a 

ship and complying with performance measures stated

in the specification. 

• Verification that this project serves the intended berth(s). 

E. Recordkeeping Requirements 

Equipment owners shall retain, at a minimum, all documents, invoices, and 

correspondence associated with the application, award, contract, purchase, installation, 

equipment operation (and if applicable, registration, insurance, and warranty), and 

reporting for at least 2 years after the end of the equipment project contact term or 

3 years after final payment, whichever is later. Records shall be readily available and 

accessible to the local agency, ARB, or ARB designee upon request for the purposes of 

ongoing evaluations or audits. 

F. Reporting Requirements 

Equipment owners shall be responsible for annual reporting to the local agency for the 

equipment project life. The equipment owner annual report shall include, but is not 

limited to: 

1. Annual reporting for shore power (grid- and non-grid-based 

power) 

• Contact information (owner name, company, address, phone). 

• Equipment description and type providing electrical power. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-9 March 2010 

• Port and berth name(s)/identifier(s). 

• Date of installation of equipment. 

• Vessel type, name, and Lloyd’s number of vessels utilizing berth. 

• Total ship visits utilizing berth. 

• Documentation of electricity usage at berth (for grid-based power). 

• Power, in megawatts, supplied to the vessels (for non-grid-based power). 

• Episodes of electrical service interruption by local utility company (for grid-based 

power). 

• Date and description of any equipment failure that prevented a ship from using the 

shore-based power (for non-grid-based power). 

• Summary of maintenance and inspections conducted. 

• Signed certification statement that the bond-funded project was operated in 

accordance with the signed contract and that all information submitted is true and 

accurate. 

• Project records must be retained for at least 2 years after contract expiration or 

3 years after final project payment, whichever is later. 

• Other information as requested by the local agency. 

• Summary of source testing (for non-grid-based power). 

2. Annual reporting for ship emissions capture and control 

system 

• Contact information (owner name, company, address, phone). 

• Description of ship emissions capture and control system. 

• Port and berth name(s)/identifier(s). 

• Date and location of equipment installation. 

• Vessel type, name, and Lloyd’s number of vessels utilizing the system. 

• Total ship visits utilizing the system by berth. 

• Power usage (kW-hr) to run the hood and source of power (grid- vs. 

 non-grid-based). 

• Natural gas usage (if any) for heating SCR duct burner. 

• Date and description of any equipment failure that prevented a ship from using the 

system to reduce emissions. 

• Summary of maintenance, source testing and inspections conducted. 

• Signed certification statement that the bond-funded project was operated in 

accordance with signed contract and that all information submitted is true and 

accurate. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix C. Ships at Berth C-10 March 2010 

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-1 March 2010 

APPENDIX D Commercial Harbor Craft 

A. Equipment Project Specifications 

Commercial Harbor Craft

Eligible 

Equipment 

Existing commercial diesel harbor craft vessels involved in goods movement with: a home 

port located in a trade corridor, 2 years of operation in California waters, Tier 0 or Tier 1 

diesel propulsion engine(s) for repower or replacement projects and Tier 2 or Tier 3 diesel 

propulsion engines for hybrid projects. Eligible vessel types include: 

• Tugboats and towboats. 

• Crew and supply vessels. 

• Work boats. 

• Pilot vessels. 

• Commercial fishing boats with at least 700 operational hours per year. 

These vessel types are defined in section 93118.5, title 17, chapter 1, subchapter 7.5, 

California Code of Regulations (d) Definitions. 

Equipment owners participating in a 90% California operation option may compete at a 

funding level that is 20% less than the applicable funding option shown below, and must do 

the following at their own expense: (1) install an approved, active GPS system in the 

funded vessel; (2) pay for monthly electronic service for the project life; and (3) provide 

electronic monitoring and activity reports when requested by the local agency or ARB, in 

the format defined by ARB staff. 

General 

Requirements 

(applicable to 

all project 

options) 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 8 years of California home port operation in the trade corridors. 

• Scrap old engine or vessel (as applicable). 

• Agree to accept an electronic monitoring unit at any time during the project life. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Demonstrate proof of insurance on upgraded or replaced equipment. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB violations associated with the equipment or 

the owner. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-2 March 2010 

Commercial Harbor Craft (cont.)

Option (1) 

Repower/ 

Replacement 

of Tugboats/ 

Towboats, 

Crew and 

Supply 

Vessels 

Partial funding of up to the lower of 50% of the eligible cost or $140/horsepower of the old 

engine to repower or replace an eligible tugboat, towboat, crew and supply vessel* equipped 

with a Tier 0 or Tier 1 propulsion engine with a Tier 2 or Tier 3 engine as described in the 

project options. 

Available project options: 

1. Repower an existing Tier 0 propulsion engine with a new engine meeting the latest 

emission standards (Tier 2 or Tier 3) and make necessary vessel modifications to 

accommodate the new engine. 

2. Replace a vessel with an existing Tier 0 propulsion engine(s) with a new vessel 

powered by an engine meeting the latest emission standards (Tier 2 or Tier 3). 

3. Repower an existing Tier 1 propulsion engine with a new engine meeting the Tier 3 

emission standard and make necessary vessel modifications to accommodate the new 

engine. 

4. Replace a vessel with an existing Tier 1 propulsion engine(s) with a new vessel 

powered by an engine(s) meeting the Tier 3 emission standard. 

5. In addition to any one of these options, also retrofit the upgraded vessel with a hybrid 

system (see Option 3). 

Eligible costs include purchase of replacement vessel (diesel or hybrid) or purchase and 

installation of a new engine or hybrid system including vessel modifications directly related to 

the new engine or system. 

Ineligible costs include out of service time (dry dock) costs, fuel, design, engineering, 

consulting, legal fees, license, registration, taxes, insurance, operation, maintenance, and 

repair. 

*Note: If the Board does not adopt Rule amendments that require upgrades on existing crew 

and supply vessels, these vessels would be eligible for funding under Option 2. 

Additional 

Requirements

Program-funded engine repower and vessel replacement projects shall be operational (post 

inspection completed, except scrappage) at least 2 years prior to any regulatory requirement 

for that technology or level of emissions control. 

Option (2) 

Repower/ 

Replacement 

of Other 

Vessels

Partial funding of up to the lower of 80% of the eligible cost or $190/horsepower of the old 

engine to repower or replace an eligible other vessel equipped with a Tier 0 or Tier 1 

propulsion engine with a Tier 2 or Tier 3 engine as described in the project options. Other 

vessel types may include work boats or pilot vessels involved in goods movement and high 

use commercial fishing vessels. 

Available project options: 

1. Repower an existing Tier 0 or Tier 1 propulsion engine with a new engine meeting the 

latest emission standards (Tier 2 or Tier 3) and make necessary vessel modifications to 

accommodate the new engine. 

2. Replace a vessel with an existing Tier 0 or Tier 1 propulsion engine(s) with a new vessel 

powered by an engine(s) meeting the latest emission standards (Tier 2 or Tier 3). 

Eligible costs include purchase of replacement vessel (diesel or hybrid) or purchase and 

installation of a new engine or hybrid system including vessel modifications directly related to 

the new engine or system. 

Ineligible costs include out of service time (dry dock) costs, fuel, design, engineering, 

consulting, legal fees, license, registration, taxes, insurance, operation, maintenance, and 

repair. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-3 March 2010 

Commercial Harbor Craft (cont.)

Option (3) 

Retrofit/ 

Replacement 

with Hybrid 

Power System

Partial funding of up to the lower of 80% of the eligible cost or $100/horsepower of the old 

engine for a hybrid power system that reduces PM and NOx emissions by 30% through 

retrofit or replacement of an eligible tugboat, towboat, or crew and supply vessel. 

An equipment owner may receive a grant to repower/replace a vessel (under Option 1) and 

to add a hybrid power system on the same upgraded vessel 

Available project options: 

1. Retrofit an existing vessel with Tier 2 or Tier 3 propulsion engine(s) with a hybrid power 

system, and make necessary vessel modifications to accommodate the new hybrid 

system. 

2. Replace an existing vessel with a new vessel powered by a hybrid system that includes 

Tier 2 or Tier 3 propulsion engine(s). 

Eligible costs include purchase of replacement vessel (diesel or hybrid) or purchase and 

installation of a new engine or hybrid system including vessel modifications directly related to 

the new engine or system. 

Ineligible costs include out of service time (dry dock) costs, fuel, design, engineering, 

consulting, legal fees, license, registration, taxes, insurance, operation, maintenance, and 

repair. 

Additional 

Requirements

• The hybrid power system must include a manufacturer’s warranty for a minimum period 

of 8 years. 

• Project eligibility is subject to an ARB staff determination that a hybrid power system 

installed on a vessel with Tier 2 propulsion engines reduces PM and NOx emissions by 

at least 30% each, compared to a similar vessel with Tier 2 propulsion engines, the same 

operating hours, and a similar duty cycle, but without the hybrid system. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Total cost of a Tier 2 engine is estimated at $230/hp. 

• Total cost of a Tier 3 engine is estimated at $290-$350/hp. 

• Total cost to repower a vessel with a hybrid power system is estimated at $300-$350/hp. 

The incremental cost is of hybrid power system is estimated at $60-$120/hp. 

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion 

• Equipment order. 

• Dry dock scheduled. 

• Equipment acquisition. 

• Dry dock start date. 

• Equipment installation complete. 

• Submittal of invoice to local agency for reimbursement. 

C. Application Information 

Equipment owners shall provide the following information and documentation in addition 

to the requirements described in Chapter VI., and other information ARB or local 

agencies may request on the equipment project applications. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-4 March 2010 

1. General information 

• Organization/agency/company name. 

• Mailing address. 

• Primary contact name and phone number. 

• Person with equipment contract signing authority (owner). 

• Proof of identity of equipment owner. 

• Business information. 

o Number of harbor craft. 

o Number of employees. 

2. Current equipment and activity information

• Harbor craft data. 

o Harbor craft name, home port. 

o Harbor craft type (tug, tow, commercial fishing, etc.). 

o Vessel model year. 

o Engine data. 

 Number of propulsion engines. 

 Make, model, engine year, number of cylinders, and serial numbers for 

each. 

 Engine family. 

 Rated brake horsepower/total engine displacement. 

 Fuel type. 

• Documentation of harbor craft ownership. 

• Harbor craft documentation. 

o U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) documentation number, if applicable. 

o CA Department of Fish and Game (DFG) license number, if applicable. 

o IMO number, if applicable. 

• Activity data for the past 2 years. 

o Vocation(s). 

o Percent operation within 24 nautical miles of the California coast. 

o Identification of the trade corridors in which the harbor craft routinely 

operated, specifically: 

 Bay Area trade corridor. 

 Central Valley trade corridor. 

 Los Angeles/Inland Empire trade corridor. 

 San Diego trade corridor. 

o Estimated average number of propulsion engine operating hours within 

24 nautical miles of the California coast. 

o Annual hours of operation. 

• Vocation and activity documentation for the past 2 years. 

o Documentation of percent operation within 24 nautical miles of the California 

coast may be required. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-5 March 2010 

3. Proposed equipment project information 

a) Options (1) and (2): Repowers and replacements 

• Vessel type. 

• Propulsion engine data. 

o Number of new engines and U.S. EPA “Tier 1” level.

o Make, model year, number of cylinders by engine. 

o Engine horsepower and fuel type by engine. 

• Documentation of all engine modifications planned as part of the repower project, 

including description of upgrades to exhaust systems, electronics, etc. (repower 

only). 

• Itemized cost for each eligible expense (verifiable quote). 

• Predicted vocation and activity data with new equipment. 

o Vocation. 

o Estimated percent operation within 24 nautical miles of the California coast. 

o Estimated average number of propulsion engine operating hours within 

24 nautical miles of the California coast. 

o Annual hours of operation. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Request for a direct payment to vendor (if applicable). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability.

b) Option (3): Hybrid power system 

• Vessel type. 

• Hybrid power system information. 

o Hybrid system make/model. 

o Horsepower of battery pack. 

o Fuel type and horsepower of hybrid system generators. 

o Propulsion engine data. 

 Number of engines. 

 Make, model year, number of cylinders by engine. 

 Engine horsepower and fuel type by engine. 

• Documentation of all engine-related modifications planned as part of the repower 

project, including description of upgrades to such things as exhaust systems, 

electronics, etc. 

• Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

• Predicted vocation and activity data with new equipment. 

o Vocation. 

o Estimated percent operation within 24 nautical miles of the California coast. 

o Estimated average of propulsion engine operating hours within 24 nautical 

miles of the California coast. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-6 March 2010 

o Estimated percent of annual operation in each one of the four trade corridors. 

o Estimated annual average number of hybrid system operating hours. 

o Estimated annual hours of vessel operation. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Request for a direct payment to vendor (if applicable). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

D. Scrap Requirements 

In addition to the general scrappage requirements listed in Chapter IV.A.14., specific 

requirements for repower and replacement projects are shown in Table D.1 below: 

Table D.1 Harbor Craft Equipment Project Scrap Requirements

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Harbor Craft Options 

(1), (2), & (3) 

(specific to 

repower) 

• The local agency shall ensure the impound and transport of 

the old engine to the licensed dismantler within 30 calendar 

days of the new engine being placed into operation.

• The licensed dismantler must dismantle and destroy the old 

engine within 60 calendar days of receipt. The engine 

destruction must be done in accordance with these 

Guidelines. 

• The licensed dismantler shall provide proof of scrappage to 

the local agency within 10 calendar days of the destruction of 

the engine. 

• The engine block shall be punctured and destroyed in such a 

manner to eliminate the possibility of future operation. 

• The local agency or its designee must provide digital 

photographs, described below, showing the destruction of the 

old engine. The local agency must receive these photos 

within 10 calendar days of the engine being scrapped. 

• The following digital photos must be taken and labeled for 

the project file: 

1. View of the vessel with the identification tags visible. 

2. Serial number printed either on the tag inside the marine 

vessel showing the ID and USCG registration (if 

applicable). 

3. Engine serial number either stamped on the block or on 

the tag. 

4. Destroyed engine block. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-7 March 2010 

Table D.1 Harbor Craft Equipment Project Scrap Requirements (cont.)

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Harbor Craft Options 

(1), (2), & (3) 

(additional 

requirements 

for 

replacements) 

In addition to the scrap requirements listed above for engine 

repower projects: 

• The local agency shall ensure the impound and transport of 

the old vessel to the dismantler within 30 calendar days of the 

new vessel being placed into operation. 

• The licensed dismantler must dismantle and destroy the old 

vessel within 60 calendar days of receipt of the old vessel. 

The destruction must be done in accordance with these 

Guidelines. 

• The vessel shall be physically destroyed in such a manner to 

eliminate the possibility of future operation. 

• Include at least one additional digital photo which documents 

the destruction of the vessel along with the photos listed 

above. 

• The licensed dismantler shall provide proof of scrappage to 

the local agency within 10 calendar days of the destruction of 

the old vessel. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-8 March 2010 

E. Post-Inspection 

• For harbor craft repower equipment projects, the post-inspection shall occur within 

60 calendar days of the owner receiving the fully operational equipment. 

• For harbor craft replacement equipment projects, the post-inspection shall occur 

within 90 calendar days of owner receiving the fully operational equipment. 

Table D.2 Harbor Craft Post-Inspection Requirements

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Options 

(1), (2), & (3) 

Repower 

• Inspection shall occur within 90 calendar days of equipment 

owner receiving the fully operational equipment. 

• For all repowered main engines, document the family name, 

make, model year, serial number listed, U.S. EPA marine 

Tier level, and the fuel type of the new engine(s).

• Start and end dates of dry dock time. 

• Name and contact information of company that performed the 

engine repower. 

Commercial 

Harbor Craft 

Options 

(1), (2), & (3) 

Replacement 

• Inspection shall occur within 90 calendar days of equipment 

owner receiving the fully operational replacement equipment. 

• For all vessel replacements, document the Family name, 

make, model year, serial number listed, U.S. EPA marine tier 

level, and the fuel type of the engine(s) in the new vessel. 

• Name and contact information of company that replaced the 

vessel. 

F. Recordkeeping Requirements 

Equipment owners shall retain, at a minimum, all documents, invoices, and 

correspondence associated with the application, award, contract, purchase, installation, 

equipment operation (and if applicable, registration, insurance, and warranty), and 

reporting for at least 2 years after the end of the equipment project contact term or 

3 years after final payment, whichever is later. Records shall be readily available and 

accessible to the local agency, ARB, or ARB designee upon request for the purposes of 

ongoing evaluations or audits. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-9 March 2010 

G. Reporting Requirements 

Equipment owners shall be responsible for annual reporting to the local agency for the 

project life. The equipment owner annual report shall include, but is not limited to: 

• Contact information (owner name, company, address, phone). 

• Home port. 

• Vessel type. 

• Vessel identifier, such as USCG, DFG Call Sign, Maritime Mobile Service Identity, or 

other relevant vessel identifier. 

• Engine make, model, year, serial number, and engine horsepower. 

• Annual engine hours of operation within 24 nautical miles. 

• For hybrid options, annual hybrid power system hours of operation. 

• Percent of operation within 24 nautical miles. 

• Percentage of annual travel in each trade corridor: 

o Bay Area trade corridor. 

o Central Valley trade corridor. 

o Los Angeles/Inland Empire trade corridor. 

o San Diego trade corridor. 

• Other information as requested by the local agency. 

• Summary of maintenance and inspections conducted. 

• Signed certification statement that the bond-funded equipment was installed on or 

replaced the vessel for which it was approved and that all information submitted to 

the local agency is true and accurate. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix D. Commercial Harbor Craft D-10 March 2010

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix E. Cargo Handling Equipment E-1 March 2010

APPENDIX E Cargo Handling Equipment 

A. Equipment Project Specifications 

Cargo Handling Equipment 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Existing diesel-powered rubber-tired gantry (RTG) crane, or diesel-powered yard truck 

with MY2004-2006 off-road diesel engine, operating at a seaport or intermodal rail yard 

in a trade corridor. 

General 

Requirements 

(applicable to 

all project 

options) 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the project 

life. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty for the project life and insurance on 

upgraded equipment. 

Option (1) 

Repower RTG 

Crane w/ 

Electric or 

Zero-Emission 

Power System 

Partial funding of up to the lower of 50% of the eligible cost or $100,000/crane to repower 

the diesel engine with an electric or zero-emission power system. 

Eligible costs include purchase and installation of a new electric engine and necessary 

parts for an existing RTG crane including directly related vehicle modifications. 

Ineligible costs include design, engineering, consulting, legal fees, license, registration, 

taxes, insurance, operation, maintenance, and repair. 

Requirements Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 15 years of 100% California operation in port or intermodal rail yard 

service in trade corridors. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the project 

life. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty for the project life and insurance on 

upgraded equipment. 

• Comply with all local permitting requirements. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB violations associated with the equipment or 

the owner. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix E. Cargo Handling Equipment E-2 March 2010

Cargo Handling Equipment (cont.)

Option (2) 

Electric or 

Zero-Emission 

Yard Truck 

Partial funding of up to the lower of 50% of the eligible cost or $50,000/truck to replace a 

yard truck equipped with MY2004-2006 off-road diesel engine with a new electric or 

zero-emission yard truck. 

Eligible costs include purchase of a new electric or zero-emission yard truck. 

Ineligible costs include license, registration, taxes (other than federal excise and sales 

tax), insurance, operation, maintenance, and repair. 

Requirements Project needs to achieve 2 years of early reductions. For fleets of 1-3 trucks, this means 

the project needs to be operational 2 years before the applicable compliance date. For 

larger fleets, this means the Program-funded truck is not eligible to be counted as a 

compliant truck in the fleet percentage calculations for a 2-year period. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 5 years of 100% California operation in port or intermodal rail yard service 

in trade corridors. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the project 

life. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty for the project life and insurance on 

upgraded equipment. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB violations associated with the equipment or 

the owner. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Total estimated cost of repowering an existing RTG crane with an electric power 

system is between $330,000-$590,000/crane. 

• Total estimated cost of an electric yard truck is ~$190,000, with an incremental cost 

(above a complying diesel engine) of ~$100,000. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix E. Cargo Handling Equipment E-3 March 2010

B. Major Milestones for Project Completion 

• Equipment order. 

• Equipment acquisition/installation. 

• Submittal of invoice to local agency for reimbursement. 

C. Application Information 

Equipment owners shall provide the following information and documentation in addition 

to the requirements described in Chapter VI., and other information ARB or local 

agencies may request on the equipment project applications. 

The following sections apply to all equipment project options. 

1. General information 

• Organization/agency/company name. 

• Mailing address. 

• Primary contact name and phone number. 

• Person with equipment contract signing authority (owner). 

• Proof of identity of equipment owner. 

• Number of pieces of diesel cargo handling equipment. 

• Business information. 

o Fleet size. 

o Number of employees. 

2. Current equipment and activity information

a) Electric or zero-emission power system for rubber-tired 

gantry crane 

• Rubber-tired gantry crane (RTG) data. 

o Port or rail yard where RTG crane operates. 

o Specific location. 

o Equipment make, model, model year. 

o RTG crane identification number or VIN. 

o Engine data (per engine). 

 Engine make, model, engine year. 

 Serial number. 

 Horsepower and fuel type. 

• Activity data for the past 2 years. 

o Annual hours of operation. 

Additional documentation may be requested by the local agency to verify information 

reported on the application. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix E. Cargo Handling Equipment E-4 March 2010

b) Electric or zero-emissions yard truck 

• Yard truck data. 

o Port or rail yard where yard truck operates. 

o Truck make, model, model year. 

o Yard truck identification number or VIN. 

o Diesel engine data (per engine). 

 Engine make, model, engine year. 

 Serial number. 

 Horsepower and fuel type. 

• Activity data for the past 2 years. 

o Annual hours of operation. 

o Identify the trade corridors in which the equipment is routinely operated. 

3. Proposed equipment project information 

a) Electric or zero-emission power system 

• Electric power system data. 

o Equipment make, model, model year. 

o Equipment power rating. 

• Itemized cost information for eligible expenses (verifiable quote). 

• Predicted activity data with new equipment. 

o Estimated annual hours of operation. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Funding sources and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, 

federal). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 

b) Electric or zero-emission yard truck 

• Electric yard truck data. 

o Truck make, model, model year. 

o Equipment power rating. 

• Itemized cost for each eligible expense (verifiable quote). 

• Predicted activity data with new equipment. 

o Estimated annual hours of operation. 

• Equipment project funding demonstration. 

o Total project cost. 

o Program dollars requested. 

o Source and amounts of other funding (private, local, other State, federal). 

o Request for a direct payment to vendor (if applicable). 

o Total project cost (Program dollars requested plus other match funding). 

o Documentation of match funding availability. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix E. Cargo Handling Equipment E-5 March 2010

D. Scrappage 

Table E.1 Cargo Handling Equipment Project Scrap Requirements 

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Cargo 

Handling 

Equipment 

Option (1) 

Repower RTG 

Crane 

• The local agency shall ensure the impound and transport 

of the old engine to the licensed dismantler within

30 calendar days of the new power system being placed 

into operation. 

• The licensed dismantler must dismantle and destroy the 

old engine within 60 calendar days of receipt. The

engine destruction must be done in accordance with 

these Guidelines. 

• The engine block shall be punctured and destroyed in 

such a manner to eliminate the possibility of future 

operation. 

• The licensed dismantler shall provide proof of scrappage 

to the local agency within 10 calendar days of the 

destruction of the old engine. 

• The local agency or its designee must provide digital 

photographs, described below, showing the destruction 

of the old engine. The local agency must receive these 

photos within 10 calendar days of the engine being 

scrapped. 

• The following digital photos must be taken and labeled 

for the project file: 

1. Existing RTG crane or yard truck (as applicable) view 

from front angle. 

2. Engine serial number either stamped on the block or 

on the tag. 

3. Destroyed engine block. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix E. Cargo Handling Equipment E-6 March 2010

Table E.1 Cargo Handling Equipment Project Scrap Requirements (cont.)

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Cargo 

Handling 

Equipment 

Option (2) 

Replace Yard 

Truck 

In addition to the requirements listed above for RTG crane 

repower projects: 

• The local agency shall ensure the impound and transport 

of the old yard truck to the dismantler within 30 calendar 

days of the new vehicle being placed into operation. 

• The licensed dismantler must dismantle and destroy the 

old yard truck within 60 calendar days of receipt. The 

destruction must be done in accordance with these 

Guidelines. 

• Sever the old vehicle frame rails to ensure that the 

vehicle is rendered useless and to prevent repeated use. 

• Include at least one additional digital photo which 

documents the destruction of the vehicle along with the 

photos listed above. 

• The licensed dismantler shall provide proof of scrappage 

to the local agency within 10 calendar days of the 

destruction of the vehicle. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix E. Cargo Handling Equipment E-7 March 2010

E. Post-Inspection 

For cargo handling equipment projects, the post-inspection shall occur within 60 days 

of owner receipt of fully operational equipment. 

Table E.2 Cargo Handling Equipment Post-Inspection Requirements 

Source 

Category 

Equipment 

Project Option 

Additional Requirements 

Option (1) 

Repower RTG 

Crane 

• Name of power system manufacturer. 

• Serial number and month/year of power system 

manufacture. 

• Inspection shall occur within 60 days of owner receipt of 

fully operational equipment. 

Cargo 

Handing 

Equipment 

Option (2) 

Electric Yard 

Truck 

• Vehicle type. 

• Vehicle identification number (VIN). 

• Vehicle make, model, model year. 

• Gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR). 

• Fuel type. 

F. Recordkeeping Requirements 

Equipment owners shall retain, at a minimum, all documents, invoices, and 

correspondence associated with the application, award, contract, purchase, installation, 

equipment operation (and if applicable, registration, insurance, and warranty), and 

reporting for at least 2 years after the end of the equipment project contact term or 

3 years after final payment, whichever is later. Records shall be readily available and 

accessible to the local agency, ARB, or ARB designee upon request for the purposes of 

ongoing evaluations or audits. 

G. Reporting Requirements 

Equipment owners shall be responsible for annual reporting to the local agency for the 

project life. The equipment owner annual report shall include, but is not limited to: 

• Contact information (owner name, company, address, phone). 

• Date and location of installation of equipment.

• Equipment type and name of home port or rail yard.

• Electric power system or yard truck make, model, year, serial number, and power 

rating. 

• Annual hours of operation. 

• Summary of maintenance and inspections conducted. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix E. Cargo Handling Equipment E-8 March 2010

• Signed certification statement that the bond-funded technology was installed on the 

equipment for which it was approved, and that all information submitted to the local 

agency is true and accurate. 

• Other information as requested by the local agency. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

March 2010 

APPENDIX F 

Equipment Project Specifications 

for FY2007-08 Funds 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

March 2010 

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-1 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

A. Trucks Serving Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards 

Equipment Project Specifications 

Trucks Serving Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Class 8 (>33,000 lbs gross vehicle weight rating) heavy-duty diesel trucks used to move 

goods. 

Equipment owner must demonstrate: 

• Continuous registration (California base-plated or International Registration Plan 

(IRP)) in California for the past 2 years, or 

• Partial year registration - a pattern of monthly or seasonal registration or other 

approved documentation that establishes California operation over the past 2 years. 

A minimum of 10,000 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per year during each of the past 

2 years is required to be eligible for this option.

• At least 50% operation within trade corridor(s) for the past 2 years. 

Ineligible 

Equipment 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s public and utility fleet rule. 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s solid waste collection vehicle rule. 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s diesel cargo handling equipment rule. 

Option (1) 

Retrofit 

Requirements 

Partial funding of up to $5,000/truck to retrofit an eligible MY2006 or older heavy duty 

diesel truck with an ARB verified Level 3 diesel particulate filter that reduces diesel PM 

by 85% or more. 

• Program-funded diesel particulate filter shall be installed and operational at least 

6 months prior to a regulatory requirement for that technology or level of emissions 

control. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to at least 2 years of 100% California-only operation and California baseplated registration. Dual plates, IRP, and any other out-of-state registrations are 

prohibited. 

• Commit to at least 2 years of frequent port or inter-modal rail yard service 

(150+ visits/year). 

• Commit to at least 50% of travel in trade corridors for duration of contract term. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the 

contract term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain filter in good operating condition and according to manufacturer’s 

recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty on filter.

• Demonstrate that any mid-1990s engine subject to the software upgrades for diesel 

trucks (i.e., chip reflash) has completed the upgrade.

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-2 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Trucks Serving Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards (continued) 

Option (2) 

Repower 

Requirements 

The lower of 50% or $20,000 to repower an eligible MY2003 or older heavy duty diesel 

truck with a new engine that meets MY2007 emission levels or lower and ARB’s 

requirements for engine manufacturer diagnostics. 

• Program-funded truck repower project shall be completed and operational at least 

3 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that technology or level of emissions 

control. For independent owner operators, the equipment project shall be 

completed and operational at least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that 

technology or level of emissions control. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to at least 5 years or 350,000 miles of 100% California-only operation and 

California base-plated registration. Dual plates, IRP, and any other out-of-state 

registrations are prohibited. 

• Commit to at least 4 years of frequent port or intermodal rail yard service 

(150+ visits/year). 

• Commit to at least 50% of travel in trade corridors for duration of contract term. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the 

contract term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Scrap the old engine. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain new engine, emission controls, and diagnostics in good operating 

condition and according to manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and comprehensive insurance on 

upgraded equipment. 

• Provide a copy of ARB Executive Order documenting that the new truck engine 

meets 2007 emission levels. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-3 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Trucks Serving Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards (continued) 

Option (3) 

Replacement 

Requirements 

Partial funding of up to $50,000/truck to replace an eligible MY2003 or older heavy duty 

diesel truck with a diesel or alternative fuel truck meeting MY2007 emission levels or lower. 

• Program-funded truck replacement project shall be completed and operational at least 3 

years prior to a regulatory requirement for a truck meeting MY2007 emission standards. 

For independent owner operators, the new truck must be operational at least 2 years 

prior to a regulatory requirement for a truck meeting MY2007 emission standards. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to at least 5 years or 350,000 miles of 100% California-only operation and 

California base-plated registration. Dual plates, IRP, and any other out-of-state 

registrations are prohibited. 

• Commit to at least 4 years of frequent port or intermodal rail yard service 

(150+ visits/year). 

• Commit to at least 50% of travel in trade corridors for duration of contract term. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the contract 

term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Scrap the old truck. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. Under a lease program, the owner and lessee must sign the 

contract. 

• Properly maintain new truck in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and comprehensive insurance on new truck. 

• Provide copy of ARB Executive Order documenting that the new truck engine meets 

2007 emission levels. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Option (1): Total cost of a diesel particulate filter is ~$10,000. 

• Option (2): Total average cost of a repower is ~$40,000. 

• Options (3) & (4): Total cost of a new MY2007 truck is ~$100,000 (diesel) to 

~$180,000 (natural gas). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-4 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

B. Other Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks 

Equipment Project Specifications 

Other Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Class 8 (>33,000 lbs gross vehicle weight rating) heavy-duty diesel trucks used to move 

goods. 

Equipment owner must demonstrate: 

• Continuous registration (California base-plated or IRP) in California for the past 

2 years, or 

• Partial year registration - a pattern of monthly or seasonal registration or other 

approved documentation that establishes California operation over the past 2 years. 

A minimum of 10,000 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per year during each of the past 

2 years is required to be eligible for this option.

• At least 50% operation within trade corridor(s) for the past 2 years. 

Ineligible 

Equipment 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s public and utility fleet rule. 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s solid waste collection vehicle rule. 

• Trucks subject to ARB’s diesel cargo handling equipment rule. 

• A truck funded via a contract executed after adoption of the Regulation to Reduce 

Emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter, Oxides of Nitrogen and Other Criteria 

Pollutants, and Greenhouse Gases from In-Use Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Vehicles

must comply with the additional restrictions on fleet averaging included in these 

Guidelines. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-5 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Other Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (continued) 

Option (1) 

Retrofit 

Requirements 

Partial funding of up to $5,000/truck to retrofit an eligible MY2006 or older heavy duty 

diesel truck with an ARB verified Level 3 diesel particulate filter that reduces diesel PM by 

85% or more. 

• Program-funded diesel particulate filter shall be installed and operational at least 

6 months prior to a regulatory requirement for that level of emissions control under the 

best available control technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. In 

this 6 month time period, a truck funded under this Program is not eligible to be 

included in any fleet averaging. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to at least 2 years of 100% California-only operation and California baseplated registration. Dual plates, IRP, and any other out-of-state registrations are 

prohibited. 

• Commit to at least 50% of travel in trade corridors for duration of contract term. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the contract 

term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain filter in good operating condition and according to manufacturer’s 

recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty on filter.

• Demonstrate that any mid-1990s engine subject to the software upgrades for diesel 

trucks (i.e., chip reflash) has completed the upgrade.

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application.
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-6 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Other Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (continued) 

Option (2) 

Repower 

Requirements 

The lower of 50% or $20,000 to repower an eligible MY2003 or older heavy duty diesel 

truck with a new engine that meets MY2007 emission levels or lower and ARB’s 

requirements for engine manufacturer diagnostics. 

• Program-funded truck repower projects shall be completed and operational at least 3 

years prior to a regulatory requirement for that level of emissions control under the 

best available control technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. In 

this 3 year period, a truck funded under this Program is not eligible to be included in 

any fleet averaging. For independent owner operators and owners of all eligible 

MY1997 or older trucks, the equipment project shall be completed and operational at 

least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that level of emissions control under 

the best available control technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to at least 5 years or 500,000 miles of 100% California-only operation and 

California base-plated registration. Dual plates, IRP, and any other out-of-state 

registrations are prohibited. 

• Commit to at least 50% of travel in trade corridors for duration of contract term. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the contract 

term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Scrap the old engine. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain new engine, emission controls, and diagnostics in good operating 

condition and according to manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and comprehensive insurance on upgraded 

equipment. 

• Provide copy of ARB Executive Order documenting that the new truck engine meets 

2007 emission levels. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-7 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Other Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (continued) 

Option (3) 

Replacement 

Requirements 

Partial funding of up to $50,000/truck to replace an eligible MY2003 or older heavy duty 

diesel truck with a diesel or alternative fuel truck meeting MY2007 emission levels or 

lower. 

• Program-funded truck replacement projects shall be completed and operational at 

least 3 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that level of emissions control 

under the best available control technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use 

trucks. In this 3 year period, a truck funded under this Program is not eligible to be 

included in any fleet averaging. For independent owner operators and owners of all 

eligible MY1997 or older trucks, the equipment project shall be completed and 

operational at least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that level of 

emissions control under the best available control technology provisions of any 

adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to at least 5 years or 500,000 miles of 100% California-only operation and 

California base-plated registration. Dual plates, IRP, and any other out-of-state 

registrations are prohibited. 

• Commit to at least 50% of travel in trade corridors for duration of contract term. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the 

contract term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Scrap the old truck. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. Under a lease program, the owner and lessee must sign the 

contract. 

• Properly maintain new truck in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and comprehensive insurance on new 

truck. 

• Provide copy of ARB Executive Order documenting that the new truck engine meets 

2007 emission levels. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-8 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Other Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (continued) 

Additional 

Requirements for 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Truck A: MY2003-2006 heavy duty diesel truck. 

Truck B: MY1990 or older heavy duty diesel truck. 

Option (4) 

Three-Way Truck 

Transactions 

Requirements

Partial funding of up to $50,000/transaction to: 

1. Replace an eligible MY2003-2006 truck (Truck A) with a diesel or 

alternative fuel truck (Truck C) meeting MY2007 emissions levels or lower; 

and 

2. Equip Truck A with an ARB-verified Level 3 diesel particulate filter that 

reduces diesel PM by 85% or more; and 

3. Scrap a MY1990 or older diesel truck (Truck B) and replace with Truck A. 

• Program-funded three-way truck transaction shall be completed and the 

new truck operational at least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for a 

truck meeting MY2007 emission standards under the best available control 

technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. In this 2 year 

period, a truck funded under this Program is not eligible to be included in 

any fleet averaging. If the original owner of Truck A and new owner of 

Truck C is an independent owner operator, Truck C must be operational at 

least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for a truck meeting MY2007 

emission standards. 

• Truck A shall be equipped with a diesel particulate filter at least six months 

prior to a regulatory requirement for a Level 3 PM device under the best 

available control technology provisions of any adopted rule for in-use trucks. 

Original owner of Truck A and new owner of new Truck C shall: 

• Equip Truck A with a Level 3 diesel particulate filter and transfer ownership 

(if applicable) to the owner of old Truck B. 

• On Truck C, commit to at least 5 years or 500,000 miles of 100% Californiaonly operation and California base-plated registration. Dual plates, IRP, 

and any other out-of-state registrations are prohibited. 

• On Truck C, commit to at least 50% of travel in trade corridors for duration 

of contract term. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during 

the contract term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project 

milestone and completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain new truck in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and comprehensive insurance on 

new truck. 

• Provide copy of ARB Executive Order documenting that Truck C engine 

meets 2007 emission levels, and the Truck A is certified for sale in 

California. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated 

with any of the trucks involved in the equipment project. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-9 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Other Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks (continued)

Option (4) 

Three-Way Truck 

Transactions 

Requirements 

(continued) 

Original owner of old Truck B and new owner of retrofit Truck A shall: 

• Scrap Truck B. 

• On Truck A, commit to at least 4 years of 100% California-only operation 

and California base-plated registration. Dual plates, IRP, and any other outof-state registrations are prohibited. 

• On Truck A, commit to at least 50% of travel in trade corridors for duration 

of contract term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project 

milestone and completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain filter in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty on filter.

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated 

with any of the trucks involved in the equipment project. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Option (1): Total cost of a diesel particulate filter is ~$10,000. 

• Option (2): Total average cost of a repower project is ~$40,000. 

• Option (3) & (4): Total cost of a new MY2007 truck is ~$100,000 (diesel) to 

~$180,000 (natural gas). 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-10 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

C. Locomotives 

Equipment Project Specifications 

Locomotives and Rail Yards 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Diesel-powered freight locomotives with no or minimal emissions control technology 

(i.e., uncontrolled, or meeting Tier 0 or Tier 1 standards). 

Equipment owner must demonstrate: 

• Operation of locomotive or equivalent locomotive horsepower in California for the past 

2 years. 

• At least 50% operation of locomotive or equivalent locomotive horsepower within 

trade corridor(s) for the past 2 years. 

• Estimated diesel fuel usage greater than 20,000 gallons per year. 

Option (1): 

Switcher 

Locomotive 

Requirements 

Partial funding for the lower of 50% or $750,000 per locomotive to replace, rebuild, or 

repower an uncontrolled, Tier 0 or Tier 1 switcher locomotive with a new generator-set that 

achieves emissions of 3.5g/bhp-hr or less for NOx, and 0.14 g/bhp-hr or less for PM, or an 

alterative technology with equivalent emission levels using U.S. EPA engine certification 

test results with ARB verification. Eligible locomotive costs include a new chassis, a new 

or rebuilt engine, and mechanical/electrical systems components necessary for safe 

operation. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 15 years of 100% operation within the trade corridors; periodic out-of-state 

maintenance may be permitted if outlined in the contract between the local agency 

and equipment owner. 

• Scrap or ban old engine/locomotive from California operation. 

• Install an active GPS unit on both old (if not scrapped) and new equipment, fund data 

collection, and report location data. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and comprehensive insurance on upgraded 

equipment. 

• (For UP and BNSF) Demonstrate how the railroad intends to comply with the 

1998 agreement for the South Coast Air Basin by submitting a compliance plan to 

ARB prior to application for bond funding in the Los Angeles/Inland Empire corridor. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-11 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Locomotives and Rail Yards (continued) 

Option (2): 

Line-Haul 

Locomotive 

Requirements 

Partial funding for the lower of 50% or $1 million/locomotive to replace or rebuild an 

uncontrolled, Tier 0 or Tier 1 line-haul locomotive with a new Tier 2 or lower-emission

engine. Eligible locomotive costs include a new chassis, a new or rebuilt engine, and 

mechanical/electrical systems components necessary for safe operation. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 15 years of 100% California-only operation. This new intrastate line-haul 

locomotive shall use California ARB diesel fuel. Periodic out-of-state maintenance 

may be permitted if outlined in the contract between the local agency and equipment 

owner. 

• Commit to at least 50% of operation in trade corridors for duration of contract term. 

• Scrap or ban old engine/locomotive from California operation. 

• Install an active GPS unit on both old (if not scrapped) and new equipment, fund data 

collection, and report location data. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and comprehensive insurance on upgraded 

equipment. 

• (For UP and BNSF) Demonstrate how the railroad intends to comply with the 1998 

agreement for the South Coast Air Basin by submitting a compliance plan to ARB 

prior to application for bond funding in the Los Angeles/Inland Empire corridor. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Estimated total cost of new switcher generator-set is ~$1.5 million. 

• Estimated total cost of an eligible Tier 2 locomotive is ~$2.0-$2.5 million. 

Excluded 

Funding 

Components 

• Auto start/stop devices required by regulation or agreements. 

• GPS units and monitoring and reporting costs. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-12 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

D. Shore Power 

Equipment Project Specifications 

Shore Power

Eligible 

Equipment 

Existing cargo ship berth or existing cargo ship terminal at a seaport located in a trade 

corridor. 

Option (1) 

Grid-Based 

Power 

Requirements 

The lower of $2.5 million/berth or 50% of the covered shore-side costs of installing 

permanent, grid-based electrical power at a cargo ship berth. 

• Program-funded grid-based shore power shall be installed and in operation at least 2 

years prior to a regulatory requirement for that technology or level of emissions 

control. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to at least 20 years of the use of grid-based shore power at the berth at the 

following levels or greater: 

o 25% of ship visits in 2011-2013. 

o 60% of the ship visits in 2014-2016. 

o 70% of the ship visits in 2017-2019. 

o 90% of the ship visits in 2020 and beyond. 

• Agree to equipment inspections that include demonstrated operability with a cargo 

ship fully powered by shore-based electrical power.

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Comply with all permitting requirements. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-13 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Shore Power (continued) 

Option (2) 

Non-GridBased Power 

Requirements 

Pro-rated 

Alternative 

Partial funding of up to $200,000 per megawatt of the covered costs of an electricity 

generating unit that provides power at a cargo ship berth or multiple berths. This unit can 

be portable or fixed on the terminal. Only zero emission units (e.g., fuel cell, solar), or 

natural gas engines equipped with selective catalytic reduction to control NOx emissions 

are eligible. 

• Program-funded non-grid-based shore power shall be installed and in operation by 

January 1, 2010. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 7 years of 100% California operation at the following levels or greater: 

o 1,000 hours per year in 2010-2011. 

o 2,000 hours per year in 2012-2013. 

o 3,000 hours per year in 2014 and beyond. 

• Agree to equipment inspections that include demonstrated operability with a cargo 

ship fully powered by shore-based electrical power supplied by the electricity 

generating unit. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty. 

• Comply with all local permitting requirements. 

• Perform source testing to measure emissions from the unit every 1,000 hours of 

operation, according to the source test requirements contained in ARB’s shore power 

regulation. 

Equipment owners may opt for a pro-rated alternative consisting of duplicate requirements, 

except that the Program will pay up to $140,000 per megawatt for a 5 year commitment to 

use non-grid-based shore power in 100% California operation. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Total shoreside cost of equipping a berth with permanent grid-based electrical power 

is ~$5.0 million/berth; some ports may incur additional costs to bring new/additional 

power capacity to the port. 

• Total cost of distributed generation power is anticipated to be $4.0 million/2 MW unit. 

• Shipside modifications will cost ~$1 million/ship.

Excluded 

Funding 

Components 

• Providing additional electrical power to the port.

• Construction and protection of infrastructure (e.g., natural gas lines) used to supply 

fuel for non-grid-based electrical generation. 

• Shipside modifications to accept shore-based electrical power. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-14 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

E. Commercial Harbor Craft 

Equipment Project Specifications 

Commercial Harbor Craft

Eligible 

Equipment 

Existing commercial diesel harbor craft vessels involved in freight movement operations 

with: a home port located in a trade corridor, 2 years of operation in California waters, and 

uncontrolled (Tier 0) diesel propulsion engine(s). Eligible vessel types include: 

• Tugboats and towboats. 

• Work, pilot, crew, and supply boats. 

• Commercial fishing boats with at least 700 operational hours per year. 

Option (1) 

Replacement/ 

Repower of 

Tugs/Tows 

Requirements 

Pro-rated 

Alternative 

For repowers on tugs and tows, the lower of 50% of total cost or $135/horsepower of the 

old engine to replace a Tier 0 propulsion engine with a new model engine meeting latest 

emission standards (Tier 2 or lower emissions) and make necessary vessel modifications 

to accommodate the new engine. For replacements of tugs and tows, the lower of 50% of 

total cost or $135/horsepower of the engine in the old vessel to replace a vessel with a 

Tier 0 propulsion engine with a new vessel powered by an engine meeting latest emission 

standards (Tier 2 or lower emissions). 

• Program-funded engine repowers and replacements for tugboats and towboats shall 

be in operation at least 2 years prior to a regulatory requirement for that technology or 

level of emissions control. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 15 years of California home port operation in the trade corridors. 

• Scrap old engine or vessel (as applicable). 

• Agree to accept an electronic monitoring unit at any time during the contract term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Demonstrate proof of comprehensive insurance on upgraded equipment. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application. 

Equipment owner may opt for a pro-rated alternative consisting of duplicate requirements, 

except that the Program will pay up to half of the Program funding level described above 

for a 7 year commitment of California home port operation in the trade corridors. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-15 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

Commercial Harbor Craft (continued) 

Option (2) 

Replacement/ 

Repower of 

Other Vessels 

Requirements 

Pro-rated 

Alternative 

Other vessel types may include: work, pilot, crew, or supply boats involved in freight 

movement operations; and high use commercial fishing vessels. For repowers of other 

vessels, the lower of 80% or $215/horsepower of the old engine to replace a Tier 0 

propulsion engine with a new model meeting latest emission standards (Tier 2 or better) and 

make necessary vessel modifications to accommodate the new engine. For replacements of 

other vessels, the lower of 80% or $215/horsepower of the engine in the old vessel to 

replace a vessel with a Tier 0 propulsion engine with a new vessel powered by an engine 

meeting latest emission standards (Tier 2 or lower emissions). 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 10 years of 100% California home port operation in trade corridors. 

• Scrap old engine or vessel (as applicable). 

• Agree to accept an electronic monitoring unit at any time during the contract term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Demonstrate proof of comprehensive insurance on upgraded equipment. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application. 

Equipment owner may opt for a pro-rated alternative consisting of duplicate requirements, 

except that the Program will pay up to half of the Program funding level described above for 

a 5 year commitment of California home port operation in the trade corridors. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Total cost of a Tier 2 engine is estimated at $270/horsepower. 

Excluded 

Funding 

Components 

• Out of service time (dry dock) costs. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-16 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

F. Cargo Handling Equipment 

Equipment Project Specifications 

Cargo Handling Equipment 

Eligible 

Equipment 

Existing diesel-powered rubber-tired gantry crane with a Tier 4 engine or Level 3 verified 

diesel emission control device operating at a seaport or intermodal rail yard in a trade 

corridor. To meet this eligibility requirement, equipment owners may propose to upgrade 

existing cranes concurrent with the installation of a Program-funded energy storage 

system. No Program funds shall be used to upgrade existing cranes to meet the 

eligibility requirements under this Program. 

Option (1) 

Energy 

Storage 

System 

Requirements 

Pro-rated 

Alternative 

The lower of 50% of the total project cost or $160,000 per crane for purchase and retrofit 

of an energy storage system that ARB has verified to Level 1 (25% PM control) or higher.

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 15 years of 100% California operation in port or intermodal rail yard 

service in trade corridors. 

• Agree to accept an on-board electronic monitoring unit at any time during the 

contract term. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project milestone and 

completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and according to 

manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty and comprehensive insurance on 

upgraded equipment. 

• Comply with all local permitting requirements. 

• Not use the energy storage system to comply with ARB’s rule for diesel cargo 

handling equipment. 

• Certify that there are no outstanding ARB equipment violations associated with the 

equipment project application. 

• Demonstrate proof that the existing crane was upgraded to meet Program eligibility 

requirements if the improvements were done concurrent with the installation of a 

Program-funded energy storage system. 

Equipment owners may opt for a pro-rated alternative consisting of duplicate 

requirements, except that the Program will pay the lower of 25% or $80,000 for a 10 year 

commitment of 100% California-only operation in port or intermodal rail yard service in 

trade corridors. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Total cost of energy storage unit is ~$160,000-$320,000 per crane. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-17 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

G. Truck Stop/Distribution Center Electrification 

Equipment Project Specifications 

Truck Stop/Distribution Center Electrification 

Eligible Equipment Truck stops, intermodal facilities, distribution centers, and other places where 

Class 8 heavy diesel trucks (over 33,000 lbs) congregate in a trade corridor. 

Option (1) 

Electrification 

Infrastructure 

Requirements 

Landside electrification infrastructure to reduce diesel engine idling and use of 

diesel-fueled internal combustion auxiliary power systems may be funded at the 

lower of 50% of eligible costs or a level commensurate with the weighted 

reductions per State dollar invested for truck replacement projects. Eligible costs 

include purchase and installation of electrical infrastructure to: enable heating, 

cooling, and the use of cab power for parked trucks at truck stops; and enable 

the use of power for transport refrigeration units and auxiliary power systems at 

distribution centers, intermodal facilities, and other places where trucks 

congregate. Reimbursement for the eligible costs shall be based on 

demonstrated use over the first year of operation. 

Equipment owner shall: 

• Commit to 10 years of operation. 

• Agree to equipment inspections. 

• Comply with record-keeping, reporting, and audit requirements. 

• Sign a legally binding contract with the local agency including project 

milestone and completion deadlines. 

• Properly maintain upgraded equipment in good operating condition and 

according to manufacturer’s recommendations. 

• Demonstrate proof of equipment warranty. 

• Comply with all local permitting requirements. 

Project Cost 

Assumptions 

• Total cost for distribution centers is $1,500-$7,000/plug at dock; $2,500-

$9,000/plug in parking areas; $500-$2,000/adapter for trailers and TRUs. 

• Total cost for truck stops is $6,000-$18,000/parking space; $3,000/truck 

modification. 

Excluded Funding 

Components 

• On-board auxiliary power units and other equipment installed on trucks are 

not eligible for funding. Transport refrigeration units are not eligible for 

funding. Electricity costs are not reimbursable. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix F. Project Specifications F-18 March 2010 

 for FY2007-08 Funds 

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

March 2010 

APPENDIX G 

Trade Corridor Maps 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

March 2010 

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix G. Trade Corridor Maps G-1 March 2010 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix G. Trade Corridor Maps G-2 March 2010 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix G. Trade Corridor Maps G-3 March 2010 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix G. Trade Corridor Maps G-4 March 2010 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix G. Trade Corridor Maps G-5 March 2010 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix G. Trade Corridor Maps G-6 March 2010 

[this page intentionally blank] 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix H. Early Grants H-1 March 2010 

APPENDIX H Early Grants from FY2007-08 Funds 

SB 88 made available no more than $25 million of the FY2007-08 appropriation 

available for the purpose of executing grant agreements directly with ports, railroads, or 

local air districts for eligible projects to achieve the earliest possible heath risk reduction. 

SB 88 required that ARB allocate funds under this “early grant” provision consistent with 

these Guidelines, and that ARB provide sufficient opportunity for the public to review 

and comment on any projects proposed for funding. 

In order to bring early grant proposals to the Board as quickly as possible, ARB staff 

directly contacted local air districts within the trade corridors to request proposals for 

local agency projects that could be under contract with equipment owners and mostly 

complete by July 31, 2008. ARB staff focused on local air districts due to their 

demonstrated experience and expertise implementing incentive programs through the 

Carl Moyer incentive program. 

To ensure that the early grant project proposals would be consistent with the eligibility 

and equipment project requirements included in the Guidelines, ARB staff advised the 

local air districts to use the Staff Draft Concepts for Implementation document, released 

September 19, 2007, as the primary basis for equipment project requirements under the 

early grant provision. In early November 2007, ARB staff also provided the local air 

districts with ARB Staff Expectations for Early Grant Proposals (attached) to further 

specify the content of the early grant proposals as well as other critical information (e.g., 

per equipment funding levels) pertinent to the air district’s development of an early grant 

proposal. 

On November 20, 2007, ARB staff held a conference call with air districts interested in 

submitting an early grant proposal to clarify questions. In response to comments from 

the air districts regarding the potential for harbor craft projects that could be quickly 

implemented, ARB staff expanded the early grant eligibility requirements to allow harbor 

craft projects at $135 per horsepower. 

ARB requested that the proposals include only the information necessary for ARB staff 

to subsequently calculate the proposal benefits using methods, calculations, and 

emission factors consistent with those included in the Guidelines. 

ARB staff received five early grant proposals, posted on the Program website at: 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/gmbond. 

ARB staff recommendations for early grant funding include truck projects and one gridbased shore power proposal. Most of the truck proposals submitted by the air districts 

are based on actual equipment project applications that the air districts received through 

other incentive programs (like the Carl Moyer program) or direct solicitations based on 

air district staff assumptions about what this Program would require, as described in the 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix H. Early Grants H-2 March 2010 

air district early grant applications. Due to the expedited nature and intent of the early 

grant proposals, these applications may be considered for funding under this Program. 

In order to maintain consistency between the early grants and the other provisions of 

these Guidelines, the following sections of these Guidelines are applicable to the early 

grant equipment projects: 

• Chapter II, Section E.10 

• Chapter III 

- Section B.1 

- Section E.9 

• Chapter IV 

- Sections A.1, 3, 5-8, 10-14, and 16-18 

- Sections B, D, and E 

• Chapter VI 

• Appendix F 

These sections apply to the early grant projects to ensure that the equipment projects 

considered for funding by each air district are consistent with these Guidelines. In 

particular, although the projects may have been initially identified through a solicitation 

process or identified from an existing incentive program, the air district must still verify 

the equipment projects’ eligibility for Program funds and competitively rank them against 

each other to ensure that the projects with the greatest benefits are funded first. 

In addition, since the air districts did not have the benefit of the detailed provisions in the 

draft Guidelines while identifying equipment projects for their early grant applications, 

the equipment project provisions in Appendices A-G apply except where ARB staff 

provided equipment specifications that differ in the ARB Staff Expectations for Early 

Grant Proposals. In these cases, the air district may choose which equipment 

specifications work best for their early grant projects. 

For example, for grid-based shore power projects under the early grants, ARB staff set 

the Program funding limit at the lower of $2.5 million or 70 percent. In response, the 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) proposed a grid-based shore 

power project in Oakland that is requesting $1.4 million per berth for two berths 

($2.8 million total Program funds) for a project with a total cost of $4 million. Although 

these Guidelines currently propose a per berth funding cap in these Guidelines of 

$2.5 million, or 50 percent, whichever is lower, ARB’s early grant recommendation for 

BAAQMD’s grid-based shore power project maintains the funding caps originally 

offered. 

In another example, for trucks, ARB Staff Expectations for Early Grant Proposals set the 

operational commitment at 5 years for truck retrofits and 10 years for truck 

replacements. Since the current Guidelines are less restrictive, air districts may allow 

equipment projects to sign equipment contracts with commitments set according to 

these Guidelines instead of the original concepts. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix H. Early Grants H-3 March 2010 

Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program 

FY2007/2008 

ARB Staff Expectations for Early Grant Proposals 

This document includes ARB staff’s expectations for FY2007-08 Early Grant Proposals 

submitted by local air district applicants. We have also included specific information 

that supplements and/or modifies the eligibility and operational requirements described 

in the September 19, 2007 concept paper for the early grant proposals. 

In general, ARB staff expects the early grant proposals to follow the staff draft concept 

paper. We have listed several key expectations for emphasis and clarification. 

• The early grant proposals represent a commitment by the applicant to sign a grant 

agreement with ARB if the Board approves the full or partial proposal, as submitted. 

We understand that the applicant may reserve the right to withdrawal the proposal 

should the Board change the conditions or eligibility requirements of the early grants. 

To provide the Board maximum flexibility in allocating the full $25 million in early 

grant dollars, we request that you design the proposals to allow pro-rated funding 

and acknowledge your willingness to accept a lower funding amount. 

• Local agency and equipment eligibility requirements remain as stated in the 

September 19, 2007 staff draft concept paper, with the exception of the 

modifications included in this document. 

• Equipment operational requirements remain as stated in the September 19, 2007 

staff draft concept paper, with the exception of the modifications included in this 

document. 

• Pre/post equipment inspections will be conducted to ensure both the old (as 

applicable) and new equipment are eligible and operational. 

• Legally binding contracts will be signed between the implementing local agency and 

equipment owners to ensure program accountability. 

• Implementing local agencies and equipment owners agree to the reporting and 

record keeping requirements of the bond program. 

• Implementing local agencies will monitor bond-funded equipment for compliance 

with contract provisions. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix H. Early Grants H-4 March 2010 

The following outline provides the content requirements for the early grant proposals. 

As indicated, we request that the submittals be no more than 10 pages in length, and 

preferably shorter. We intend to append these proposals to our proposed Guidelines for 

public review and comment prior to Board consideration. 

• Summary of proposal (1-2 pages). 

- Briefly state the air quality and health concerns addressed. 

- Summarize project types, corridor(s), and costs. 

- Identify the implementation schedule (with major milestones). 

o What/how much can you accomplish by June 30, 2008?

o Why these accomplishments are achievable. 

• Detailed proposal (5-10 pages). 

- Geographic coverage 

o Identify the targeted trade corridor(s). 

o Does the proposal target equipment upgrades in specific highly impacted 

communities? If so, which ones? 

o Describe marketing/outreach (must include entire corridor). 

- Old equipment 

o Certify that old equipment eligibility is based on the equipment project 

information tables in the staff draft concept paper, as modified by this 

document. 

o Identify the number of pieces of equipment targeted, by sector. 

 Describe the basis for proposing this number of equipment for expedited 

implementation under the early grants. 

 For trucks, identify the number of retrofits and the number of replacements 

being proposed. 

o Operating assumptions for old equipment. 

 Trucks (list retrofits and replacements separately). 

Average age (model year). 

Average annual vehicle miles traveled. 

 Locomotives (only switchers). 

Average age (years). 

Control level (uncontrolled, Tier 0, Tier 1). 

Average annual fuel use. 

Average annual operating hours. 

 Shore power. 

Identify type(s) of cargo vessel (container, bulk, reefer). 

- New equipment 

o Certify that old equipment eligibility is based on the equipment project 

information tables in the staff draft concept paper, as modified by this 

document. 
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementation 

Appendix H. Early Grants H-5 March 2010 

o Operating assumptions for new equipment. 

 Trucks. 

Must be model year 2007 or 2008 truck. 

Average annual vehicle miles traveled (if different from old equipment). 

Identify fuel type. 

 Locomotives (switchers only). 

Identify fuel type. 

ARB staff shall use annual operating hours reported for old equipment 

to calculate emission benefits. 

 Shore power. 

Ship visits per year using shore power (per berth). 

(ARB staff shall use operating assumptions to do the calculations consistent with 

factors/ formulas/methodologies that will be included in the draft Guidelines.) 

- Staff resources. 

o Describe staff resources available to implement proposal. 

- Funding proposals. (Note: Please separate by sector. ARB will consider each 

sector as a separate proposal.) 

o Total cost. 

 Identify truck costs for retrofits and replacements. 

o Bond funds requested. 

o Matching funds. 

 Detail funding source. 

Demonstrate that these funds are available. 

DMV $4 and $2 fees may be used as non-state match (since clarified 

to be $4 fees only). 

o Administration funds requested. 

 Must comply with staff concept limits. 

- Early grant milestone requirements. 

o 100 percent of contracts signed with equipment owners by June 30, 2008. 

o Trucks. 

 Majority of proposed truck upgrades completed and operational by 

June 30, 2008. 

 All of proposed truck upgrades completed and operational by 

December 31, 2008. 

o Locomotives. 

 All of new locomotives ordered by June 30, 2008. 

 All of new locomotives operational by December 31, 2009. 

o Shore power. 

 All completed and operational by December 31, 2010.

- Provide a project schedule that includes interim milestones. 

o Outline specific accomplishments by June 30, 2008.

- Implementation. 

o Describe how you will secure equipment projects. 

o Describe how you will select projects for funding.
Proposition 1B: Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Final 2010 Guidelines for Implementa

Appendix H. Early Grants H-6 Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program Early Grant Proposals – Updated Requirements (Updates to project options identified in staff concept pa

Category Eligibility Amounts Cont

Leng

Truck retrofits 

- at least 50% of operation of old 

equipment must take place within the four trade corridors 

$5,000 per retrofit 5 yea

Truck replacement 

- at least 50% of operation of old 

equipment must take place within the four trade corridors 

- old truck must have annual VMT of 

10,000 miles or greater 

$50,000 per truck 10 ye

Shore power - grid-based power only 

$2.5M/berth (grid-based), or 70% of the shoreside cost to bring power to berth, whichever is less 

20 ye

Locomotives 

- switchers only - at least 50% of operation of old 

equipment must take place within the four trade corridors 

- uncontrolled locomotives eligible 

with 35,000 gal/yr minimum 

$500,000/switcher (no DPF required) 20 ye

Harbor craft Not eligible for early grants Note: Early grants must maintain requirement for 100 percent California operation for new equipment (e

locomotive maintenance).