Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules 25555 

that the Martinsburg Area has attained 

the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and will 

continue to attain the standard. Final 

approval of this redesignation request 

would change the designation of the 

West Virginia portion of the 

Martinsburg Area from nonattainment to 

attainment for the 1997 PM2.5 annual 

NAAQS. EPA is also proposing to 

approve the associated maintenance 

plan for the Area submitted on August 

5, 2013, as a revision to the West 

Virginia SIP because it meets the 

requirements of section 175A of the 

CAA as described previously in this 

rulemaking notice. In addition, EPA is 

proposing to approve the 2007 base year 

emissions inventory as meeting the 

requirement of section 172(a)(3) of the 

CAA. Furthermore, EPA is proposing to 

approve the 2017 and 2025 PM2.5 and 

NOX MVEBs submitted by West Virginia 

for Berkeley County for transportation 

purposes. EPA is soliciting public 

comments on the issues discussed in 

this document. These comments will be 

considered before taking final action. 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely proposes to approve state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule proposing to 

approve West Virginia’s redesignation 

request, maintenance plan, 2007 base 

year emissions inventory, and MVEBs 

for transportation conformity purposes 

for the West Virginia portion of the 

Martinsburg Area for the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS, does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), because the SIP is not approved 

to apply in Indian country located in the 

state, and EPA notes that it will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, PM2.5, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides. 

40 CFR Part 81 

Air pollution control, National parks, 

Wilderness areas. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 16, 2014. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10212 Filed 5–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0802; FRL 9909–23– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AS15 

Technical Amendments to Inadvertent 

Errors in Air Quality Designations for 

Fine Particles, Ozone, Lead, Nitrogen 

Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This action proposes 

technical amendments to address 

several minor, inadvertent and 

nonsubstantive errors in the regulatory 

text establishing the air quality 

designations for certain areas in 

fourteen states for the 1997 Fine 

Particles (PM2.5) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS), the 2008 

Ozone NAAQS, the 2008 Lead NAAQS, 

the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 

NAAQS and the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide 

(SO2) NAAQS. The states are: Alabama, 

Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, 

Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, 

Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Washington 

and Wisconsin. This action does not 

propose to change the designation for 

any area. In the ‘‘Rules’’ section of this 

Federal Register, we are making the 

same technical amendments as a direct 

final rule without a prior proposed rule. 

If we receive no adverse comment, we 

will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 4, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2013–0802, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-Docket@

epamail.epa.gov, Attention Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0802. 

• Fax: (202) 566–1541, Attention 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013– 

0802. 

• Mail: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2013–0802, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Room: 

3334, Mail Code: 6102T, Washington, 

DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0802. Such 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
25556 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013– 

0802. The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA)’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov, 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov, 

your email address will be 

automatically captured and included as 

part of the comment that is placed in the 

public docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters, any 

form of encryption and be free of any 

defects or viruses. Send or deliver 

information identified as CBI only to the 

following address: Roberto Morales, 

OAQPS Document Control Officer 

(C404–02), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle 

Park, NC 27711, Attention Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0802. 

For additional information about the 

EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http://

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the index at http://

www.regulations.gov. Although listed in 

the index, some information is not 

publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading 

Room, William Jefferson Clinton West 

Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004. 

This Docket Center is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the Public 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the Air Docket 

is (202) 566–1742. 

Documents related to the affected 

designations are available in the 

following dockets: 

Designations for the 1997 PM2.5

NAAQS: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2003–0061; 

Designations for the 2008 Ozone 

NAAQS: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2008–0476; 

Designations for the 2008 Lead NAAQS: 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009– 

0443; 

Designations for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS: 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011– 

0572; and 

Designations for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS: 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012– 

0233. 

In addition, the EPA has established 

Web sites for the designation 

rulemakings at: http://www.epa.gov/

pmdesignations/, http://www.epa.gov/

ozonedesignations, http://www.epa.gov/ 

leaddesignations/, http://www.epa.gov/

no2designations/ and http://

www.epa.gov/so2designations. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carla Oldham, Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail 

Code C539–04, Research Triangle Park, 

NC 27711, phone number (919) 541– 

3347 or by email at: oldham.carla@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Why is the EPA issuing this proposed 

rule? 

Whenever the EPA establishes a new 

NAAQS, section 107(d) of the Clean Air 

Act requires the EPA to designate all 

areas of the country as meeting or not 

meeting the new NAAQS, or as 

unclassifiable where available 

information does not support a 

determination whether an area is 

meeting the NAAQS. The area 

designations and boundaries for each 

NAAQS are set forth in tables in the 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 40 

CFR part 81. This action proposes 

technical amendments to minor, 

inadvertent and nonsubstantive errors 

in the 40 CFR part 81 regulatory text 

concerning the air quality designations 

for certain areas in fourteen states for 

the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, the 2008 Ozone 

NAAQS, the 2008 Lead NAAQS, the 

2010 NO2 NAAQS and the 2010 SO2

NAAQS. These states are: Alabama, 

Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, 

Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, 

Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Washington 

and Wisconsin. This action does not 

propose to change the designation for 

any area. 

We are publishing a direct final rule 

in the ‘‘Rules’’ section of this Federal 

Register because we view this as a 

noncontroversial action and anticipate 

no adverse comment. We explain our 

reasons for this action in the preamble 

to the direct final rule. The regulatory 

text for the proposal is identical to that 

for the direct final rule published in 

‘‘Rules’’ section of this Federal Register. 

If we receive no adverse comment, we 

will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. If we receive adverse 

comment, we will publish a timely 

notice in the Federal Register to 

withdraw the direct final rule or 

portions thereof. The portions that are 

not withdrawn will become effective on 

the date identified in the direct final 

rule, notwithstanding adverse comment 

on any other portion. We would address 

all public comments in any subsequent 

final rule based on this proposed rule. 

We do not intend to provide a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. For further 

information, please see the information 

provided in the ADDRESSEES section of 

this document. 

B. Where can I get a copy of this 

document and other related 

information? 

In addition to being available in the 

docket, an electronic copy of this 

proposal will be available on the World 

Wide Web. Following signature by the 

EPA Administrator, a copy of this action 

will be posted on the EPA’s Web site 

www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/new.html. 

C. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

Submitting CBI: Do not submit this 

information to the EPA through 

www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly 

mark the part or all of the information 

that you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to the EPA, mark the outside 

of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules 25557 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver 

information identified as CBI only to the 

following address: Roberto Morales, 

OAQPS Document Control Officer 

(C404–02), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle 

Park, NC 27711, Attention Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0802. 

Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

• Follow directions—The agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

CFR part or section number. 

• Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

• Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

• Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

• Explain your views as clearly as 

possible. 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action proposes technical 

amendments to minor, inadvertent and 

nonsubstantive errors in prior area 

designations. This type of action is 

exempt from review under Executive 

Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 

1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 

21, 2011). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not propose an 

information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is 

defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This action 

proposes to correct minor, inadvertent 

and nonsubstantive errors in prior area 

designations and does not require any 

party to perform an information 

collection. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Small entities 

include small businesses, small 

organizations and small governmental 

jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing 

the impacts of today’s rule on small 

entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A 

small business as defined by the Small 

Business Administration’s regulations at 

13 CFR 121.201;’’ (2) a small 

governmental jurisdiction that is a 

government of a city, county, town, 

school district or special district with a 

population of less than 50,000; and (3) 

a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of today’s proposed rule on 

small entities, I certify that this action 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. This action proposes technical 

amendments to address several minor, 

inadvertent and nonsubstantive errors 

in the regulatory text concerning the air 

quality designations for certain areas in 

prior designation actions and does not 

impose any requirements on small 

entities. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA) 

This action contains no federal 

mandate under the provisions of Title II 

of the UMRA of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531– 

1538 for state, local or tribal 

governments or the private sector. The 

action does not propose an enforceable 

duty on any state, local or tribal 

governments or the private sector. 

Therefore, this action is not subject to 

the requirements of sections 202 and 

205 of the UMRA. 

This action is also not subject to the 

requirements of section 203 of UMRA 

because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. This 

action corrects minor, inadvertent and 

nonsubstantive errors in prior area 

designations 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the states, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This action 

proposes technical amendments to 

minor, inadvertent and nonsubstantive 

errors in prior area designations. Thus, 

Executive Order 13132 does not apply 

to this action. In spirit of Executive 

Order 13132, and consistent with the 

EPA policy to promote communications 

between the EPA and state and local 

governments, the EPA specifically 

solicits comment on this proposed 

action from state and local officials. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). This action only proposes 

technical amendments to minor, 

inadvertent and nonsubstantive errors 

in prior area designations. Thus, 

Executive Order 13175 does not apply 

to this action. 

The EPA specifically solicits 

additional comment on this proposed 

action from tribal officials. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying only to those regulatory 

actions that concern health or safety 

risks, such that the analysis required 

under section 5–501 of the Executive 

Order has the potential to influence the 

regulation. This action is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 because it does 

not establish an environmental standard 

intended to mitigate health or safety 

risks. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 

2001)), because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTAA) 

Section 12(d) of the NTTAA of 1995, 

Public Law No. 104–113, section 12(d) 

(15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs the EPA to 

use voluntary consensus standards 

(VCS) in its regulatory activities unless 

to do so would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise 

impracticable. VCS are technical 

standards (e.g., materials specifications, 

test methods, sampling procedures and 

business practices) that are developed or 

adopted by VCS bodies. The NTTAA 

directs the EPA to provide Congress, 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
25558 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

through the Office of Management and 

Budget, explanations when the agency 

decides not to use available and 

applicable VCS. This action does not 

involve technical standards. Therefore, 

the EPA did not consider the use of any 

VCS. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 

(Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the U.S. 

The EPA has determined that this 

proposed rule will not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment. This action proposes 

technical amendments to minor, 

inadvertent, nonsubstantive errors in 

the designations for certain areas. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, National parks, 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: April 15, 2014. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2014–09271 Filed 5–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 14–54; RM–11698; DA 14– 

460] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; 

Toquerville, Utah 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This document requests 

comments on a Petition for Rule Making 

filed by JER Licenses, LLC, winning 

bidder in Auction 93 for Channel 281C3 

at Peach Spring, Arizona. The petition 

proposes the substitution of Channel 

246C for vacant Channel 280C at 

Toquerville, Utah to accommodate the 

hybrid application requesting the 

downgrade of the new FM station, from 

Channel 281C3 to Chanel 280A at Peach 

Springs, Arizona. A staff engineering 

analysis indicates that Channel 246C 

can be allotted to Toquerville, Utah 

consistent with the minimum distance 

separation requirements of the 

Commission’s Rules with a site 

restriction located 46.7 kilometers (29 

miles) northeast of Toquerville. The 

reference coordinates are 37–34–28 NL 

and 112–56–33 WL. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before May 26, 2014, and reply 

comments on or before June 10, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. In 

addition to filing comments with the 

FCC, interested parties should serve the 

petitioner as follows: A. Wray Fitch III, 

Esq, Gammon & Grange, P.C., 8280 

Greensboro Drive, 7th Floor, McLean, 

Virginia 22102–3807. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

14–54, adopted April 3, 2014, and 

released April 4, 2014. The full text of 

this Commission decision is available 

for inspection and copying during 

normal business hours in the FCC’s 

Reference Information Center at Portals 

II, CY–A257, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. This document 

may also be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractors, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 

800–378–3160 or via email 

www.BCPIWEB.com. This document 

does not contain proposed information 

collection requirements subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

proposed information collection burden 

‘‘for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). 

Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. 

Members of the public should note 

that from the time a Notice of Proposed 

Rule Making is issued until the matter 

is no longer subject to Commission 

consideration or court review, all ex 

parte contacts are prohibited in 

Commission proceedings, such as this 

one, which involve channel allotments. 

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules 

governing permissible ex parte contacts. 

For information regarding proper 

filing procedures for comments, see 47 

CFR 1.415 and 1.420. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Nazifa Sawez, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR 

Part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336 and 

339. 

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

■ 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Utah, is amended by 

removing, Channel 280C at Toquerville; 

and by adding Channel 246C at 

Toquerville. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10124 Filed 5–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 679 

RIN 0648–BD98 

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic 

Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish of the 

Gulf of Alaska; Groundfish of the 

Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of availability of fishery 

management plan amendments; request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery 

Management Council (Council) 

submitted Amendment 100 to the 

Fishery Management Plan for 

Groundfish of the Bering Sea and 

Aleutian Islands Management Area 

(BSAI FMP) and Amendment 91 to the 

Fishery Management Plan for 

Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS