alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Screening Targeted Populations To Interrupt On-
going Chains of Transmission With Enhanced Partner Notification--The 
STOP Study, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number PA 09-004 and 
Demonstration Project of Elective Adult Male Circumcision Conducted in 
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinics in the United States, FOA 
Number PA 09-005

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., April 27, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Sheraton Gateway Hotel, Atlanta Airport, 1900 Sullivan 
Road, Atlanta, GA 30337, Telephone (770) 997-1100.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
``Screening Targeted Populations to Interrupt On-going Chains of 
Transmission with Enhanced Partner Notification--The STOP Study, FOA 
Number PA 09-004;'' and ``Demonstration Project of Elective Adult 
Male Circumcision Conducted in Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) 
Clinics in the United States, FOA Number PA 09-005.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.P.H., 
M.S., Scientific Review Administrator, Strategic Science and Program 
Unit, Office of the Director, Coordinating Center for Infectious 
Diseases, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E-60, Atlanta, GA 30333, 
Telephone: (404) 498-2275.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 20, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-6859 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Techwell, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Fumihiro Kozato, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 6,  2009 | /s/ Fumihiro  Kozato                   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                       | Fumihiro Kozato**                      |
|                       | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
burden of establishing that relief is warranted. 

### Pan v. Eighth Judicial

Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Petitioners argue that the district court was compelled to grant their motion for dismissal on the ground of real party in interest's noncompliance with the mandatory early case conference meeting and report under NRCP 16.1. Petitioners further argue that the district court abused its discretion in failing to consider the factors set out in 

### Arnold ix Kip, 123 Nev. 410,168 P.3d 1050 (2007), in ruling on their motion.

Here, the district court explicitly found that extraordinary circumstances existed to compel the extension of the NRCP 16.1 deadlines. 

### See NRCP 16.1(b) (providing that dismissal is not appropriate where extraordinary circumstances warrant extending the applicable deadline). In finding that extraordinary circumstances warranted extending the deadlines for conducting and reporting on an early case conference, we conclude that the district court satisfied 

### Arnold's requirement of considering factors related to the purpose of the rule. 

### See Arnold, 123 Nev. at 415-16, 168 P.3d at 1053 (providing a nonexhaustive list of factors); 

### Dornbach v. Tenth Judicial Dist. Ct., 130 Nev. , 324 P.3d 369, 373 (2014) (recognizing that a district court can properly exercise its discretion in ruling on an NRCP 16.1(e) motion even if it does not expressly enumerate the 

### Arnold factors). Further, the district court noted the basic policy of deciding cases on their merits, which this court recognizes as a guide to the proper exercise of discretion. 

### Dornbach, 130 Nev. at , 324 P.3d at 373.

As the district court entered findings in support of its order denying petitioners' motion to dismiss and ruled in accordance with the purpose of the rule and the general policy favoring adjudication on the

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

### merits, we conclude that the district court did not exercise its discretion

arbitrarily or capriciously and that petitioners have not demonstrated that extraordinary relief is warranted. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Dornbach, 130 Nev. at , 324 P.3d at 374; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly,

we ORDER the petition DENIED.



## / Hardesty

Cherry

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Mandelbaum, Ellerton & McBride E. Brent Bryson Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 

### 3
(0) 1947A ea
Daniel STENNIS v. STATE

CR-15-1111

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00439-CV

EDEN COOPER, LP APPELLANT

V.

CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS; 

JAMES HOLGERSSON; EDWARD 

DRYDEN; SHERI CAPEHART; MEL 

LEBLANC; AND KATHRYN

WILEMON

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have previously issued an opinion and judgment in this appeal. See Eden 

Cooper, LP v. City of Arlington, No. 02-11-00439-CV, 2012 WL 2428481 (Tex. 

App.—Fort Worth June 28, 2012, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). Appellant Eden Cooper, 

LP filed a motion for rehearing, and we requested a response to the motion. 

Appellant has now filed an unopposed motion to withdraw its motion for rehearing 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

and to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). In the motion, appellant 

represents that “all parties to this appeal have settled and compromised all claims 

between and among them.” Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion to withdraw 

the motion for rehearing, withdraw our June 28, 2012 judgment, and dismiss this 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let 

execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GARDNER and GABRIEL, JJ. 

DELIVERED: November 21, 2012

 

2Appellant has not requested that we withdraw our prior opinion in this appeal, 

and we decline to do so. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(c).
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-0435 

ROBERT J. MARTINEAU, JR. BILL HASLAM 

COMMISSIONER GOVERNOR 

June 5, 2012 

Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 

Subject: 	 NPL State Concurrence 

Clinch River Corporation 

728 Emory Drive, Harriman, Roane County, Tennessee. 

TDOR: 73-505/EPA ID: TND987768587 

Dear Ms. Fleming: 

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Request for Concurrence on 

May 16, 2012 concerning the State of Tennessee's support for the addition of the Clinch River 

Corporation Site to the National Priority List (NPL). We would like to take this opportunity to 

confirm that the State of Tennessee supports the listing of the Clinch River Corporation site to the 

NPL. In addition to the State supporting listing, the Harriman City Council also passed resolution 

RO 11 2-0 I in January 2012 supporting the listing ofthe Site to the NPL. 

We would a lso like to recognize the EPA Region 4 Superfund Division Emergency Response and 

Removal Branch (ERRB) for their tireless assistance over the past year. We appreciate the good 

work that ERRB has performed at the site and understand that much remains to be done before the 

City of Harriman can put this property back into productive use as a waterfront park. Please 

contact Andy Binford, Director of the Division of Remediation, at (615) 532-0911 if you have any 

questions. 

~ 

Robert J. Martineau, Jr. 

Commissioner 

Cc: 	 Andy Binford, TDEC 

Frankl in E. Hill, EPA
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ William S. DaughertyWilliam S. DaughertyChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 99.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Leon Nowalsky, state and attest that:

     (1)  I am the President of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the "issuer").

     (2)  Accompanying this certification is the Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, a periodic report (the
"periodic report") filed by the issuer with the Securities Exchange
Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which contains financial statements.

     (3)  I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
based on my knowledge:

     *    the periodic report containing the financial statements fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Exchange Act, and

     *    the information contained in the periodic report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented
          therein.


/s/ Leon Nowalsky
------------------------
Leon Nowalsky
Date:  November 14, 2002
SHAREHOLDER LOAN AGREEMENT


Shareholder Loan Agreement

1.

This shareholder loan agreement (“Agreement”) documents a loan arrangement between Kunekt Corporation (“Kunekt”) and Mark Bruk (“Bruk”), the sole shareholder of Kunekt, effective as of October 1, 2007.

2.

Bruk agrees to loan Kunekt funds, as required, to operate Kunekt’s business.

3.

The term of the loan is indefinite, and the loan can be repaid at any time, in part or in full. It is expected that the loan will be repaid on or prior to December 31, 2008, but this is not required.

4.

There are no interest payments during the life of the loan; the repayment amount will include all interest that accrues while the loan is outstanding.

5.

The interest rate on this loan is 7.50%, the current prime rate, as reported by the Wall Street Journal for October 31, 2007.  Interest will accrue annually.

6.

For purposes of calculating interest owing on the outstanding loan amount, the outstanding loan amount will be recalculated at the end of each month, until the loan is fully repaid, taking into account any (i) new funds loaned to Kunekt by Bruk, and (ii) payments to Bruk by Kunekt, which payments will be applied on a LIFO basis.

7.

The formula below is an example of how accrued interest will be calculated. Assume that there is a loan or loans made during November 2007, in an aggregate amount of $10,000 and it is repaid on December 31, 2008.

$10,000 *0.075 * (397 / 365.25) = $815.20 / 13 = $62.71

where:

$10,000 = the loan principal as of November 30, 2007

0.075 = the interest rate, 7.50% in decimal form

397 = the number of days from December 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008

365.25 = the average number of days in a year

$815.20 = the total interest amount in this example

$62.71 = the monthly interest amount in this example

8.

For financial accounting and tax purposes, Kunekt will recognize interest expense for this loan each month. Since interest accrues annually, the monthly interest will be the same each month within a given calendar year.

9.

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Province of British Columbia applicable to agreements negotiated, executed and performed wholly within British Columbia.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate originals by their duly authorized officers or representatives.

		
	BRUK










              /s/ MARK BRUK

Signed:                                         

Name: Mark Bruk                              

Date: November 3, 2007                       

	KUNEKT










              /s/ MARK BRUK

Signed:                                       

Name: Mark Bruk                            

Title: President                               

Date: November 3, 2007
EXHIBIT NO. 32

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of Pepper  Rock  Resources  Corp.  (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-K for the year  ended  July 31,  2010 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  the  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer,  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Sec.  1350 as adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

     (1)  the  Report  of the  Company  filed  today  fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: November 12, 2010   BY: /s/ Phil Kueber
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Phil Kueber, President, Chief Executive Officer,
                              Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer,
                              Principal Accounting Officer, and sole member of
                              the Board of Directors.
John Christopher HENDERSON v. STATE

CR-15-0575

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 14, 2016 Reh. denied December 2, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6667

CHRISTOPHER G. DARBY, a/k/a Chris Darby,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN CARTLEDGE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(2:12-cv-00021-TLW)

Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 27, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher G. Darby, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher G. Darby seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition as an 

unauthorized, successive petition. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Darby has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

further deny Darby’s motions for the appointment of counsel and 

for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Invitel Holdings A/S (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Martin Lea, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Martin LeaMartin Lea President and Chief Executive
Officer May 14, 2009


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Invitel
Holdings A/S and will be retained by Invitel Holdings A/S and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
|    |                                   |
|----|-----------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A; |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   |   |   | /s/ William Collier |
|   | Name: |   | William Collier |
|   | Title: |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-58-2017]

      ( print page 499)    
On August 28, 2017, the Erie County Industrial Development Agency, grantee of FTZ 23, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Cummins, Inc., within Subzone 23D, in Lakewood and Jamestown, New York.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (82 FR 44557-44558, September 25, 2017). On December 26, 2017, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: December 28, 2017.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2017-28478 Filed 1-3-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P