1 DOCKET NO: A-98-49
Item: II-B3-125



## 2012 - Monitoring Inspection Report

INSPECTION No. EPA-WIPP-7.12-17b OF THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT July 17-19, 2012

U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Center for Waste Management and Federal Regulation 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

March 20132 

### Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. .... 4

2 Scope ......................................................................................................................... .............. 4

3 Inspection Team, Observers, and Participants ......................................................................... 5

4 Inspection Schedule ........................................................................................................... ...... 6

4.1 Monitoring of Geomechanical Parameters ....................................................................... 6

4.2 Monitoring of Hydrological Parameters ........................................................................ 11

4.3 Monitoring of Waste Activity Parameters ..................................................................... 17

4.4 Monitoring of Drilling Related Parameters .................................................................... 18

4.5 Monitoring of Subsidence Parameters ........................................................................... 21

Attachments ................................................................................................................... ............... 22

Attachment A: Inspection Plan ................................................................................................ 23

Attachment B: 2012 Monitoring Inspection Checklist ............................................................ 24

Attachment C: Documents Reviewed ...................................................................................... 313 

### Figures

Figure 1 Taking Extensometer Measurement at E140 S3480 ........................................................ 9

Figure 2 Tape Extensometer 51X-GE-00396 Used to Measure Convergence at E 140 S3480 ... 10

Figure 3 Remote Cable Rotary Roof Beam Extensometer Located at E140 S3493. ................... 11



### Tables

Table 1 Monitored Parameters ................................................................................................. ...... 5

Table 2 WIPP Inspection Team ................................................................................................. .... 5

Table 3 DOE Documents Reporting Monitored Geomechanical Parameters and Relevant
Procedures .................................................................................................................... ................... 7

Table 4 DOE Documents Reporting Monitore d Hydrological Parameters and Relevant
Procedures .................................................................................................................... ................. 13

Table 5 General Culebra Groundwater Chemistry Constituents Measured ................................. 15

Table 6 Estimated Culebra Travel Times, Tr avel Distance, and Aver age Groundwater Velocity

............................................................................................................................... ........................ 16

Table 7 Waste Activity Monitoring Parameters .......................................................................... 17

Table 8 Delaware Basin Documents Reviewed ........................................................................... 194 

### 1 Executive Summary

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducted an inspection of the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) from July 17 to July 19, 2012 as part of EPA’s continuing WIPP oversight program. The purpose of this inspection was to verify that DOE continues to adequately monitor ten parameters listed in the Compliance Certification Application (CCA), Volume 1, S ection 7.0, in particular Table 7- 7. Attachments A and B contain the inspection plan and the checklist used by the EPA inspectors, and Attachment C lists documents reviewed by the EPA.

The inspection examined the implementation of monitoring for geomec hanical, hydrological, waste activity, drilling-related, and subsidence pa rameters. The EPA inspectors toured locations where measurements are taken, reviewed parame ter databases, and reviewed documents and procedures directing thes e monitoring activities.

EPA found that DOE continues to effectively implement the monitoring programs at WIPP for
all areas reviewed. EPA did not have any findings or concerns. The inspectors also confirmed
that the results of DOE monitoring programs are reported annually.



### 2 Scope

The EPA WIPP Compliance Crit eria (40 CFR Part 194.42(a)) require DOE to “conduct an analysis of the effects of disposal system parame ters on the containment of waste in the disposal system.” The results of these analyses were included in the 1996 Compliance Certification Application (CCA), confirmed in the most recent Compliance Recertification Application (CRA), and were used to develop pre-clos ure and post-closure monitoring requirements.

Volume 1, Section 7.0, of the CCA documented DOE ’s analysis of monitoring parameters. Table 7-7 of the CCA lists the ten parameters that DOE determined may affect the disposal system. These parameters are grouped into major categor ies and listed in Table 1. EPA accepted these ten monitoring parameters in the 1998 Certific ation Decision and confirmed them in the 2010
Recertification Decision.5 Table 1 Monitored Parameters

Parameter Categories Parameter

Geomechanical Creep closure
Extent of deformation
Initiation of brittle deformation Displacement of deformation features

Hydrological Culebra groundwater composition Change in Culebra groundwater flow direction

Subsidence Subsidence measurements

Drilling Related Drilling rate Probability of encountering a Castile brine reservoir
Waste Activity Waste Activity

This inspection was performed under authority of 40 CFR 194.21, which authorizes EPA to verify the continued effectiveness of the para meter monitoring program at WIPP. Inspection
activities included an examination of monitori ng and sampling equipment both on and off site, and in the underground. EPA also reviewed numerous sampling procedures and measurement techniques and verified impleme ntation of an effective qual ity assurance program (see the
document list in Attachment B of this report).



### 3 Inspection Team, Observers, and Participants

The inspection team consisted of four EPA sta ff listed in Table 2. Observing the inspection was
Thomas Kesterson of the State of New Mexico Environment Department.

Table 2 WIPP Inspection Team

Inspection Team Member Position and Inspection Focus Affiliation

Tom Peake Inspection Leader EPA ORIA

Nick Stone Inspector EPA – Region 6

Jonathan Walsh Inspector EPA - ORIA

Kathleen Economy Inspector EPA - ORIA6 

### 4 Inspection Schedule

The inspection began on Tuesday, July 17, 2012, w ith an opening meeting where site staff presented changes to the monitoring programs th at occurred since the previous inspection. On July 18, the inspection continued w ith interviews and demonstrations of various aspects of each parameter monitoring area. The collection of ge omechanical measuremen ts in the underground was observed on July 18th. On July 19 th the EPA inspectors examined the database(s) used to store Delaware Basin parameters and the WIPP Waste Data System (WDS) which is the waste tracking computer database sy stem. The inspection closeout meeting was held on July 19, 2012 in Carlsbad, New Mexico. EPA in spectors reviewed three fundament al areas to verify continued implementation of the DOE parameter monitoring program during the pre-closure phase: 1) written plans and procedures, 2) quality assurance procedures and records, and 3) results of the monitoring program in the form of raw data, inte rmediate reports, and final annual reports, if appropriate. The inspection checklist in Attach ment A provides details of these inspection
activities.



### 4.1 Monitoring of Geomechanical Parameters

DOE committed to measuring four geomechanical pa rameters in the CCA: creep closure, extent of deformation, initiation of br ittle deformation, and displacement of deformation features. These parameters are monitored through convergence m onitoring, deformation monitoring, fracture mapping and stratigraphic and fr acture mapping, respectively. WIPP has four programs that supply information for these four parameters : the geomechanical m onitoring program, the geosciences program, the ground control progra m, and the rock mechanics program. These programs are described in WIPP Geotechnical Engineering Program Plan , WP07-1 Revision 6 (EPA Inspection ID KME-M2012 GT013); the program plan has not been modified since March 19, 2008. The monitored geomechanical paramete rs are reported annually in two volumes spanning a 12 month period. The 2010 – 2011 monitored parameters are documented in
Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – J une 2011 Vol 1, DOE/WIPP-12-3484, Vol. 1 ( EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012- GT01) and Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011 Vol 2 (( EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2021- GT02)

. Procedures used to measures these parameters are also given in the same table. As indicated in Table 3, onl y two procedures have been modified since the 2011 inspection. Changes to these procedures were reviewed by the EPA inspection and are deemed ade quate for their intended purpose.

Manual convergence measurements are taken following the guidance given in Manually Acquired Geomechanical Instrument Dat a (WP 07-EU1301 Rev 7). During the morning of July 18, 2012 EPA inspectors observed a convergence reading in the underground conducted at location E140-S3480, Chord A C (see Figure 1). The convergence data were measured using a GeoKon/Ealey Extensometer. Figure 1 is a phot ograph of a convergence measurement conducted
at that location. Measurements were taken fo llowing the protocol given for the GeoKon/Ealey Extensometer readout unit in procedure Manually Acquired Geomechanical Instrument Data,
Section 2.0.7 Table 3 DOE Documents Reporting Monitored Geomechanical Parameters and Relevant
Procedures

Geomechanical Monitored Parameter Annual Report, July 2010 – June 2011

Document Title DOE Document ID # EPA Inspection ID #

Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011, Vol 1 DOE/WIPP-12-3484, Vol. 1 KME-M2012-GT01

Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011, Vol 2 DOE/WIPP-12-3484, Vol. 2 KME-M2012-GT02

Procedures Used to Install Geomec hanical Monitoring Instruments and

Take Parameter Measurements

Document Title DOE Document ID # Last
Modification EPA Inspection ID #

Geologic and Fracture Mapping of Facility Horizon Drifts WP 07-EU1001 Rev 3 No Change KME-M2012 GT03

Geologic Core Logging WP 07-EU1002 Rev 0 No Change KME-M2012 GT04

Manually Acquired Geomechanical
Instrument Data WP 07-EU1301 Rev 7 5/24/2012 KME-M2012 GT05

Geomechanical Instrument Data Processing WP 07-EU1303 Rev 4 No Change KME-M2012 GT06

Installing Convergence Reference
Points WP 07-EU1304 Rev 6 11/3/2011 KME-M2012 GT07

Installing Multiposition Borehole
Rod Extensometers WP 07-EU1305 Rev 2 No Change KME-M2012 GT08

Installing Rock Bolt Load Rock
Cells WP 07-EU1306 Rev 4 No Change KME-M2012 GT098 Installing Wire Convergence Meters WP 07-EU1307 Rev 3 No Change KME-M2012-
GT010

Installing Wire Extension Meters WP 07-EU1308 Rev 2 No Change KME-M2012-
GT011

WIPP Core Storage, Handling, and
Distribution WP 07-EU3504 Rev 3 No Change KME-M2012-
GT012

WIPP Cumulative Convergence
Point for S3650-W0285 N/A N/A KME-M2012-
GT013

WIPP Convergence Rate –Point
S3650-W0285 N/A N/A KME-M2012-
GT014

Relevant QA for Software

Software Screening and Control WP 16-2 Rev 11 01/05/2012 KME-M2012-QA001

During the morning of July 17 EPA inspecto rs interviewed Robert Edward Lewis, a Geotechnical Engineer. Mr . Lewis wrote the software that pr ocesses both manually and remotely acquired geotechnical instrument da ta and converts it into graphi cal form. Mr. Lewis noted that all the upload and conversion soft ware is written under procedure Software Screening and
Control WP 16-1 Rev 11 (EPA Inspection ID: KME- 2012-QA001). EPA inspectors queried Mr. Lewis on how drift convergence/extensometer da ta is uploaded, processed and submitted in DOE’s geotechnical reports. Mr . Lewis indicated procedure Geomechanical Instrument Data Processing , WP 07-EU1303 Rev 4 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012 GT06) is followed when uploading and processing geotechnical data. If any data has been manually collected and uploaded, the CI needs to be assured that the data are collected following procedure Manually Acquired Geomechanical Instrument Data , WP 07-EU1301 Rev 7 (EPA Inspection ID: KMEM2012 GT05). Mr. Lewis demonstrated uploading a nd processing geotechnical data collected at S3650-W0285 convergent point (and reported graphically) while EP A inspectors spot reviewed the process against the two procedures. The re sults of this demonstration are submitted as
documents WIPP Cumulative Convergence Point for S3650-W0285 and WIPP Convergence
Rate –Point S3650-W0285 ( EPA Inspection IDs: KME-M2012-GT013 and KME-M2012- GT014). The final uploaded data was compared to convergence/extension data reported in
annual the Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011, (Volume I and II).9 Figure 1 Taking Extensometer Measurement at E140 S3480

The tape extensometer measurements are reported in Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011, Volume 2 . Convergence point data measured at location E140 S3480, Chord A-C is given in Table 5-3 of Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011, Volume 1 (DOE/WIPP-12-3484, Vol. 1) and Figure 4-120 of Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011, Volume 2 (DOE/WIPP-12-3484, Vol. 2, EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-GT02)

. Extensometer calibration and expiration dates ar e given on the face of the extensometer, shown in Figure 2 of this report, and indicate the in strument calibration was current. EPA inspectors
reviewed the DOE staff and cont ractors collecting room converge nce field data and convergence rates reported in the annual report and determin ed the geomechanical parameters are adequately
monitored.10 Figure 2 Tape Extensometer 51X-GE-00396 Used to Measure Convergence at E 140 S3480

Figure 3 is picture of a cable rotary extens ometer (DOE ID: 51X-GE-00396) used to measure
roof beam extension located at E140 S3493. The inst rument consists of a wi re cable that attaches
to an interior anchor bolt inside the bore hole (not visible). The cable records the ‘beam
extension’ via a transducer from the roof collar to the interior bolt. Measurements are transmitted to the data loggers located above ground. EPA reviewed convergence data for E140 S3493
recorded in Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011, Vol 2, Figure 4-14 (DOE/WIPP-12-3484, Vol. 2, EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-GT02). From the review of the annual report figures and tables it appears ex tensometer 51X-GE-00396 adequately records and monitors beam displacement.11 Figure 3 Remote Cable Rotary Roof Beam Extensometer Located at E140 S3493.

Inspection personnel interviewed WIPP geotechni cal engineering person nel to discuss any programmatic changes, observed manual convergence measurements and fracture mapping, examined data from stratigraphic mapping and remotely measured extensometers, compared staff practices to written pro cedures, and reviewed the annual WIPP Geotechnical Analysis Report (DOE/WIPP-12-348), Volumes 1 and 2 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-2012-GT01, KME2012-GT02, respectively).

In summary, EPA inspectors observed tape extensometer and convergence measurements, interviewed personnel responsible for data pr ocessing and spot-checked convergence data reported in Geotechnical Analysis Report for Ju ly 2010 – June 2011, (Volume I and II), and observed ground control by regular bolting and fencing. EPA inspectors reviewed procedure Software Screening and Control

, WP 16-1 Rev 11 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-2012-QA001) which describes the instructions for the developmen t, acquisition, maintenance, used to write the converting geotechnical data collected into gr aphical and textual formats. Based on these inspection observations and act ivities EPA concluded that th e DOE monitoring activities and procedures are adequate. EPA inspectors did not identify a ny concerns or findings for the geotechnical program.



### 4.2 Monitoring of Hydrological Parameters

DOE committed to measure two hydrological para meters in the CCA: 1) Culebra groundwater composition, and 2) changes in the Culebra gro undwater flow direction. Culebra groundwater chemistry monitored parameters are collected under the Water Quality Surveillance Program. Culebra flow direction is determined by usi ng annual measurements of Culebra fresh water heads as inputs to a calibrated potentiometric map. Programmatic function s and responsibilities
are outlined in the WIPP Groundwater Monitoring Program Plan

, WP 02-1 Revision 10 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2011-GW09). Results of this program are published in the annual WIPP12 Site Environmental Report for 2010, Issued September 2011, DOE/WIPP-11-2225 ( EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-CBFO02) denoted herein as the 2010 ASER. The 2010 ASER describes and presents environmental progra mmatic data which the groundwater monitoring program falls under. The groundwater chemistry m onitoring results and th e groundwater particle travel path length, travel time, and average gr oundwater velocity from the WIPP waste handling shaft to the WIPP land withdrawal boundary (L WB) are given in the Section 6.2 of the 2010
ASER.

During the July 17 th opening presentation Rick Salness, manager of the Environmental Monitoring and Hydrology department, presente d ongoing activities within the program (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-GW01). An update of well networks maintained through the Groundwater Monitoring Program was provided. A summary of these updates are given below:

Current Well Network as of June 30, 2012

 48 Culebra Monitoring Wells

 12 Magenta Monitoring Wells

 1 Dual Completion Culebra/Magenta Well

 1 Dewey Lake Well

 2 Bell Canyon Wells

 20 Shallow Santa Rosa/Dewey Lake Contact Wells

Basic water quality chemistry measurements c ontinue at the six ground water monitoring wells screened in the Culebra Dolomite, located up- and down-gradient from the repository, and one well screened in the Dewey Lake Redbeds. Basic water chemistry testing was also performed at three wells screened in the Magenta Dolom ite—H-2b1, H-4c, and H-9c—and one additional well
screened in the Culebra Dolomite—well H9bR.

Mr. Salness presented programmatic and procedur al changes and modifica tions. These are given
below.

 Field data collection and pr ocessing of pH, specific conductance, temperature, and specific gravity serial sampling are now m easured using a newly acquired single-step flow-through cell sampling instrument. This inst rument replaces the two-step field bench chemistry analysis process. Use of the single-st ep instrument to collect field data required procedure updates. The new procedure Field Parameter Measurements and Final Sample Collection, REV 0

- WP 02-EM1010 is used to operat e the flow-through instrument and replaces the two procedures Serial and Final Sample Collection and Anion and Cation Analysis (WP 02-EM1005 and WP 02-EM1006, resp ectively). Since the later two procedures are listed in the NMED Class 2 Monitoring Well Permit plan they will not be retired until the Class 2 permit has been updated with the NMED. The NMED has already approved the use of the single fl ow-through cell sampli ng and its attendant procedure.

 The indicator parameters for pH, specific gr avity, specific conductance, and temperature determine when the sampled water is repres entative of formation groundwater. What has13 been modified since the 2011 inspection is th e point at which, i.e., ‘when’, indicator measurement points are reached in the groundw ater sampling. Previously, final indicator measurement points were determined after al l sampled parameters had stabilized and three wellbore volumes were pumped. Now, it is determined that final indicator points are reached when specific threshold values ar e reached (within ± 5% of three consecutive measurements) or when three wellbore volumes are pumped, whichever occurs first.

 During the 2011 inspection it wa s unclear what organizati on, DOE or Sandia National Laboratories, was responsible for developi ng the annual Culebra and shallow subsurface groundwater potentiometric maps provi ded in the ASER. The procedure Data Review for the Annual Culebra Groundwater Report

, WP 02-EM1025, Rev. 4 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-GW08) was modified to clarify that SNL develops the final Culebra potentiometric map, as specified in Analysis Report for Preparation of 2011 Culebra Potentiometric Surface Contour Map, (ERMS 557633, EPA Inspection ID: KMEM2012-GW13). The procedure Data Review for the Annual Culebra Groundwater Report specifies that DOE personnel devel op the shallow subsurface map.

 The reporting frequency for th e potentiometric heads in the Culebra and the shallow subsurface groundwater (used to create poten tiometric maps) is now semi-annual (due by May 31 and November 30 of each year) rather than monthly.

 The Culebra Groundwater Report is now subm itted annually rather than semi-annually.

 Two groundwater constituents, to tal organic halogens and iro n, have been removed from the required groundwater indicator parameter list.

 Well drilling activity since the last inspecti on occurred at well-pad H-11. At this location monitoring well H-11b4 was plugged and aband oned. This well was replaced with the newly drilled and completed well H-11b4R . Well H-11b4R is only screened in the
Culebra.

Table 4 lists the current Groundwater Monitori ng Program procedures and indicates those
modified since the last inspection.

Table 4 DOE Documents Reporting Monito red Hydrological Parameters and Relevant
Procedures

Geomechanical Monitored Parameter Annual Report, July 2010 – June 2011

Document Title DOE Document ID # EPA Inspection ID #

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2010, Issued September 2011 DOE/WIPP-11-2225 KME-M2012-
CBFO0214 Procedures Used to Monitor Hydrological Parameters

Document Title DOE Document ID # Last
Modification EPA Inspection ID #

WIPP Groundwater Monitoring Program Plan WP 02-1, Rev. 11 2/28/2012 KME-M2012-
GW02

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Environmental Monitoring
Plan DOE/WIPP-99-2194 Mar-12 KME-M2012-
GW03

Field Parameter
Measurements and Final Sample Collection WP 02-EM1010 2/27/2012 KME-M2012-
GW04

Administrative Processes for Environmental Monitoring and Hydrology Programs WP 02-EM3001 Rev 16 2/28/2012 KME-M2012-
GW05

Pressure Density Survey WP 02-EM1021 Rev 8 6/6/2011 KME-M2012-
GW06

Groundwater Level
Measurement WP 02-EM1014 Rev 6 No Change KME-M2012-
GW07

Data Review for the Annual Culebra Groundwater Report WP 02-EM1025 Rev 4 2/27/2012 KME-M2012-
GW08

EM&H Field Work and Implementation of the Land Use Request WP 02-EM1024 Rev 5 No Change KME-M2012-
GW09

Water Level Data Handling and Reporting WP 02-EM1026 Rev 4 2/22/2012 KME-M2012-
GW10

Integrated Sample Control
Plan WP 02-EM.02 Rev 3 4/26/2012 KME-M2012-
GW11

Electric Submersible Pump Operation WP 02-EM1002 Rev 5 2/28/2012 KME-M2012-
GW12

Analysis Report for Preparation of 2011 Culebra
Potentiometric Surface ERMS 557633 5/17/2012 KME-M2012-
GW1315 Contour Map

EPA inspectors reviewed the Culebra groundwater chemistry results reported in the 2010 ASER (DOE/WIPP-11-225), Sections 6.2.4 and Appendices E and F. Culebra groundwater quality components are evaluated annually as part of the groundwater monitoring programs. Groundwater samples from seven monitoring wells are taken and analyzed against the baseline values reported in 2000. Constituents are compared against the 95 th upper tolerance levels for data considered nonparametric (i.e., having neit her a normal nor a lognormal distribution with 16–95 percent non-detects) or the 95 th percentile value as calculated for baseline values reported
in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant RCRA Backg round Groundwater Quality Baseline Update Report (IT Corporation, 2000). Table 5 lists the groundwater indicator parameter constituents monitored. All Culebra general chemistry indicator parameters were within the relevant accepted tolerance limits or perc entile values. None of the constitu ents of interest exceeded baseline
concentrations.

Table 5 General Culebra Groundwater Chemistry Constituents Measured

Common Cations (calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium) Common Anions (choride, sulfate)

Divalent cations Dissolved magnesium and potassium

Eh potential Specific Gravity pH (Acidity, Alkalinity) Temperature TDS

Total Organic Halogens 1 Total Iron 1

1 As of 2012 these constituents will no long er be considered indicator parameters.

Culebra potentiometric head measurements are performed by members of the WIPP environmental monitoring program. Changes in Cu lebra flow direction are modeled by using an ensemble average of distributed aquifer para meters and calibrating modeled heads to those annually measured in the field. The analysis pr oviding Culebra groundwater flow direction is performed by scientists at Sandia National Labo ratories. The EPA inspector examined Culebra potentiometric head data and resulting travel paths and times given in Sections 6.2.5 of the 2011 ASER report. These were compared to the same parameters provided in the 2009 ASER errata (DOE/WIPP-10-2225). Table 6 presents predicte d travel times given in the two reports.16 Table 6 Estimated Culebra Travel Ti mes, Travel Distance, and Average Groundwater Velocity

Particle Track Travel Time Originating Waste Handling Shaft to LW Boundary 2009 ASER 1 2010 ASER 2

Estimated Advective Travel Time (years) 5900 6283

Travel Distance (kM) 4.089 4.075

Average Groundwater Travel Velocity (m/yr) 0.69 0.65

1 WIPP Site Environmenta l Report for 2009 Errata, September 2010, DOE/WIPP-10-2225, p.
148

2 WIPP Site Environmental Report for 2010, September 2011, DOE/WIPP-11-2225, p.157

The slight differences between the estimated June 2009 and February 2010 travel time results are reasonable. EPA verified that the potentiometric map development process (specifically tasked to Sandia National Laboratories) is more clearly defined. The process developing the map has not changed since last year and continues to be adequate for this monitoring requirement.

In conclusion EPA inspectors found the gr oundwater monitoring parameters, groundwater chemistry constituents and potentiometric head s collected by DOE’s Groundwater Monitoring Program to be adequate. EPA inspectors did no t identify any concerns or findings for the groundwater monitoring program.17 

### 4.3 Monitoring of Waste Activity Parameters

In the CCA, DOE committed to monitor the tota l radioactivity of waste emplaced in WIPP. Waste activity is collected for each container sh ipped to WIPP and stored in the WIPP Waste Data System (WDS). The WDS is a web-based data base which tracks total radioactivity as well as other waste components emplaced in WIPP (e.g., ferrous and non-ferrous metals, organic materials and MgO as well as radionuclide activ ity). The overarching requirements for the WDS
are discussed in the WIPP Waste Data System Program and Data Management Plan , WP 08- NT.01 Revision 22 (EPA Inspection ID: KME- M2012-WACT01). Specific requirements and criteria for implementation of the program are described in Waste Stream Profile Form Review and Approval Program (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012- WACT10). DOE reports annual waste activity information received a nd emplaced in the repository in the Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Repor t – 2011 DOE/TRU-11-3425 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012- WACT02).

On the morning of July 19th inspectors met w ith WWDS personnel, who answered questions and generated a Nuclide Report, a Materials Emplacement Report, se veral query reports, and the MgO safety factor calculations . All electronic records were f ound to contain required waste stream, container, and emplacement informa tion. The Nuclide Report (WDS Nuclide Report through 2012-07-18, EPA Inspection ID: KME-2012-WA CT08) generated the current activity of repository emplaced waste as of July 18, 2012—the re port included the current total activities of the ten EPA-tracked radionuclides emplaced in the repository. This latest report was compared to a similar report generated dur ing last year’s inspection 2011 Nuclide Report (EPA Inspection ID: KME_M2011_WACT01). Comparing the two reports demonstrated consiste nt reported activities for closed panels and increased activity for Pa nel 6, which at the time of the inspection was actively receiving waste.

Documents viewed by the EPA inspectors are given in Table 7. The reports and documents provided to EPA and interviews with WDS staff members demonstrated the DOE is adequately monitoring total ra dionuclide activity emplaced in the WIPP repository.

Table 7 Waste Activity Monitoring Parameters

Document Title DOE Document ID # La st Modification EPA Inspection
ID#

WIPP Waste Data System Program and Data Management
Plan WP 08-NT.01
Revision 21 02/27/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT01

Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory DOE/TRU-11-3425 November 2011 EPA Inspection ID:
KME-M2012-18 Report – 2011 WACT02)

Savannah River -
SR120065 ( Inspection query) 07/19/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT03

Los Alamos National
Lab-LA120110 ( Inspection query) 07/19/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT004

Idaho National LabIN120181 ( Inspection query) 07/19/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT005

Argon National LabAER12013 ( Inspection query) 07/19/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT06

Argon National LabAER1204 ( Inspection query) 07/19/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT07

WDS Nuclide Report through 2012-07-18 N/A 07/18/2012 (KME M2012 WACT08)

Waste Stream Profile
Form Review and Approval Program WP 08-NT.03, Rev.
12 12/29/2010 (KME M2012 WACT10)

Waste Data System
User's Manual DOE/WIPP-09-3427,
Rev 7 03/29/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT11

Waste Data System
Software Verification
and Validation Plan WP 08-NT.05, Rev.11 03/12/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT12

Waste Data System Configuration Management and Software Quality Assurance Program WP 08-NT.04 REV 19 03/27/2012 KME-M2012-
WACT13



### 4.4 Monitoring of Drilling Related Parameters

DOE committed to measure two dr illing related parameters in the CCA: the drilling rate and the probability of encountering a Cast ile brine reservoir. The overarching protocol for measuring these parameters are documented the Delaware Basin Drilling Surveillance Plan , WP 02-PC.02 Rev 4 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012–DB02). Dr illing data is collected using procedure19 Delaware Basin Drilling Database Upgrade Process WP 02-EC3002, Rev. 5 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-DB01).

The surveillance program measures and records many parameters related to drilling activities
around the WIPP site. The survei llance results documented quart erly and combined drilling activity in the annual report Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual Report, September2011, DOE/WIPP-11-2308 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M 2012–DB10). The annual report provides drilling data within the basin occurring between Se ptember 1, 2010 and August 31, 2011.

An update and summary of Delaware Basin drill ing activities was presen ted during the July 17 th , 2012 opening briefing (EPA Inspection ID: KM E-M2012-DB12). EPA Inspectors reviewed the information provided in the Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual Report (DOE-WIPP-11-2308, EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-DB10) and Delaware Basin Monitoring Quarterly Report (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-DB08). On July 19 th EPA inspectors met with WIPP staff and
viewed how the database is week ly updated to track drilling activ ities in the basin. The procedure followed is given in Delaware Basin Drilling Database Upgrade Process WP 02-EC3002 Rev 5 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012–DB11). The pro cedure is used to update databases with
information from various commercial and state sources. Drilling results and brine encounters are presented in the annual and quarterly reports.

EPA reviewed the drilling surveillance database and examined change s in drilling rates, permitted wells, and active injection wells. EPA insp ectors did a spot check review of Texas and New Mexico drilling reports, well database listings and maps of wells drilled within the oil and gas wells within the Delaware basin and WIPP vi cinity with. Maps, the result of WIPP staff demonstrating how the Delaware Basin database maps are produced, of all the hydrocarbon wells
drilled in Delaware Basin for New Mexico and Texas were given to EPA (New Mexico Hydrocarbon 2012 xlsx, EPA Inspection ID : KME-M2012-DB04 and Texas Hydrocarbon 2012 xlsx, EPA ID: KME-M2012-DB05, respectively). As part of the demonstration WIPP staff created a map of hydrocarbon wells within the nine township surrounding WIPP. This map was compared to Figure 2 in the DOE June-2012 Quarterly Report (DBM-55-2012; EPA ID: KMEM2012-DB07 and EPA Inspection ID: KM E-M2012-DB08, respectively). Another demonstration map was created showing the status all wells located within the one mile buffer zone as of July 10, 2012 and given to EPA (W ell Status – One Mile Buffer 7-10-2012; EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012-DB09).

Based on EPA’s reviews of the database, the ma p creation process and staff interviews EPA inspectors concluded that DOE adequately tracks drilling rates and Castil e brine encounters near within the WIPP vicinity. EPA inspectors di d not identify any findings or concerns.

Table 8: Delaware Basin Documents Reviewed

Document Title DOE Document ID # Last
Modification EPA Inspection ID #20 Delaware Basin Drilling Database Upgrade Process WP 02-EC3002 Rev. 5 11/10/2011 KME-M2012
DB01

Delaware Basin Surveillance
Plan WP 02-PC.02 Rev 4 5/12/2012 KME-M2012-
DB02

New Well Drilled in Northern Portion of Delaware Basin.pdf ( Inspection query) 7/19/2012 KME-M2012-
DB03

New Mexico Hydrocarbon
2012.xlsx ( Inspection query) 7/19/2012 KME-M2012-
DB04

Texas Hydrocarbon 2012.xlsx ( Inspection query) 7/19/2012 KME-M2012-
DB05

Well Status - One Mile Buffer 7-10-2012.pdf ( Inspection query) 7/19/2012 KME-M2012-
DB06

DBM-55-2012. pdf ( Inspection query) 7/19/2012 KME-M2012-
DB07

Delaware Basin Quarterly Report (June-2012) Delaware Basin 2012 Qtrly Report 6/30/2012 KME-M2012-
DB08

Well Status - One Mile Buffer 7-10-2012.pdf ( Inspection query) 7/19/2012 KME-M2012-
DB09

Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual Report DOE/WIPP-11-2308 9/30/2011 KME-M2012-
DB10

Delaware Basin Drilling Database Upgrade Process WP 02-EC3002 Rev 5 11/10/2011 KME-M2012-
DB11

Delaware Basin EPA Presentation July 17, 2012 N/A 4/17/2012 KME-M2012-
DB1221 

### 4.5 Monitoring of Subsidence Parameters

In the CCA DOE committed to measure ground subs idence at the WIPP site. This parameter is measured using procedures documented as part of the WIPP Underground and Surface Surveying Program WP 09-ES.01, Rev. 5 (EPA Inspection ID:KME-M2012-SB01). DOE performs subsidence surveys at the site annua lly during pre-closure ope rations. The results of this program are reported annually. Th e 2011 survey results are provided in WIPP Subsidence Monument Leveling Survey 2011 , DOE/WIPP 12-2293, 12/27/2011 (EPA Inspection ID:KMEM2012-SB02). The most recent report, published in December 2011, shows that survey loop
vertical closures and accuracies meet the st andards set by the Nationa l Geodetic Survey for Second Order Class II surveys. The report fulfills the requirement that the subsidence parameter is measured and reported on a yearly basis.

On July 17, during the inspection of the WIPP site, subsidence st aff demonstrated the office procedure included in Section 2.0 of the technical procedure Subsidence Survey Data Acquisition Report , WP 09-ES4001, Rev. 2 (EPA ID : KME-M2012- SB02), which describes the steps taken to process raw field survey data and to calculate the final surface elevations published in the annual report. EPA inspectors did not identify any concerns or findings.

Table 8 WIPP Subsidence Procedures and Documents Reviewed

Document Title DOE Document ID # Last
Modificatio

n EPA Inspection ID
#

WIPP Underground and Surface Surveying Program WP 09-ES.01, Rev. 5 01/14/09 KME-M2012-SB01

Subsidence Survey Data Acquisition Report WP 09-ES4001, Rev 2 12/11/2011 KME-M2012-SB02

WIPP Panel Closure Survey Plan WP 09-ES.02, Rev 2 12/29/2010 KME-M2012-SB03

WIPP Subsidence Monument Leveling Survey
2011 DOE/WIPP 12-2293 12/27/2011 KME-M2012-SB0422 

### Attachments23 

### Attachment A: Inspection Plan

WIPP Monitoring Inspection Plan 40 CFR 194.42 for the year 2011

Purpose :

Verify that the Department of Energy (DOE) can demonstrate that the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is monitoring the parameter commitment s made in the documentation to support the EPA’s certification decision, in particular CCA , Volume 1, Section 7.2, Table 7.7 and Appendix MON. This inspection is conducted unde r the authority of 40 CFR 194, Section 21.

This inspection is part of EPA’s continued overs ight to ensure that WIPP can, in fact, monitor the performance of significant parame ters of the disposal system.

Scope:

Inspection activities will include an examinati on of monitoring and sampling equipment both on and off site, and in the underground. A review of sampling procedures and measurement techniques may be conducted. Qu ality assurance procedures and documentation for each of these
activities will also be reviewed.

Focal Areas of This Year’s Inspection:

- What has changed in the monito ring program this past year?

- What documentation and procedures have changes?

- Update the monitoring program a nd results for the past year.

- Have any monitoring parameters changed, a nd have any action limits been achieved?

Location : This inspection will be held at the WIPP facility location twenty-six miles south east of Carlsbad, New Mexico and the surrounding vicinity as needed.

Duration : The EPA expects to complete its inspection in two days. Each day will begin with an opening meeting at 8:00 a.m. and end befo re 5:00 p.m. with a closeout session.

Inspection Date : Week of July 16, 2012.

Documents For Review: The latest versions of any documen tation and/or procedures related to the DOE monitoring program.24 

### Attachment B: 2012 Monitoring Inspection Checklist

Checklist for Geotechnical Moni toring Commitments– July 2012

Monitoring Commitments Geotechnical Parameters
# Question Comment (Objective Evidence) Result
1 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented plans/programs/procedures

to measure - a) Creep Closure; b) Extent of Deformation; c) Initiation of Brittle Deformation and d) Displacement of Deformation
Features during the pre-closure phase of operations as specified in the CCA part of the geomechanical monitoring system? (CCA, Volume 1, Table 7-7; App MON, Table MON-1) 40 CFR 194.42 (c) and (e) WIPP Geotechnical Engineering Program Plan , (WP 07-01 Rev 6: EPA Inspection ID# KME-M2012- GT13), documents plans to measure, report, and the QA requirements
related to these activities. Section 3.0
of WP 07-01 documents the geomechanical monitoring program
and records the activities associated with this program. Section 4.0 of WP 07-01 documents the quality assurance requirements for these activities.

WIPP site staff discussed changes to the program during the past year (KME-M2012-GT13). Staff demonstrated the adequacy of the program and that the program produces satisfactory results. Geotechnical staff showed samples of remote measurements, sample plots, and staff preformed underground manual measurements of convergence. The inspector toured the underground and reviewed the computer system and databases used to collect and process
recorded data.

Results of this program are documented annually in the Geotechnical Analysis Report Volumes
1 and 2 for each reporting period (DOE/WIPP 12-3484, Vol 1; EPA Inspection ID#: KME-M2012-GT01 and DOE/WIPP 12-3484, Vol 2; EPA Inspection ID#: KME-M2012-GT02, respectively). The inspector verified that the SAT25 geomechanical parameters continued to be appropriately monitored by
DOE.
2 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented an effective quality assurance program for item 1 above?
40
CFR 194.22 During the 2012 inspection the EPA inspector evaluated the quality assurance program and found it to be adequate. SAT

3 Does DOE demonstrate that the results of the geotechnical investigations are reported annually? (CCA, App. MON, Page MON-10) WP 07-01 Rev 6, Section 3.2 (EPA Inspection ID#: KME-M2012-GT13) requires that analysis be performed annually and result s are published in the annual geotechnical analysis report (DOE/WIPP 12-3484, Vol 1; EPA Inspection ID#: KME-M2012-GT01 and DOE/WIPP 12-3484, Vol 2; EPA Inspection ID#: KME-M2012-GT02, respectively). SAT

Checklist for Hydrologic Moni toring Commitments – July 2012

Monitoring Commitments Hydrological Parameters
# Question Comment (Objective Evidence) Result 1 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented plans/programs/procedures to measure

– a) Culebra Groundwater Composition; (CCA, Volume 1, Table 7-7; App MON, Table MON-1) 40 CFR 194.42 (c) and (e) Objective evidence given reviewing the following procedures and reports:
Field Parameter Measurements and Final Sample Collection , (WP 02- EM1010 Rev 0; EPA Inspection ID#:
KME-M2012

‐ GW04) SAT

b) Change in Culebra Groundwater Flow Direction during the pre-closure phase of operations as specified in the CCA part of WIPP’s groundwater monitoring plan? (CCA, Volume 1, Table 7-7; App MON, Table MON-1) 40 CFR 194.42 (c) and (e) Objective evidence given reviewing the following procedures and reports –

WIPP Groundwater Monitoring Program Plan (WP 02-1, Rev. 11; EPA Inspection ID#: KME-M2012

‐ GW02)

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2010 (DOE/WIPP-11-2225; EPA Inspection
ID#: KME-M2012

‐ CBFO

‐ 02 )26 Analysis Report for Preparation of 2011 Culebra Potentiometric Surface Contour Map , ERMS 55763305/17/12; EPA Inspection ID#: KMEM2012-GW13).

Results are documented annually Section 6.2.5, Figure 6.12 of Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2010 (DOE/WIPP-11-2225; EPA Inspection
ID#: KME-M2012-CBFO-02 ) Figure
6.1 of

2 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented an effective quality assurance program for item 1 above? (CCA, App MON, Page MON-22) 40
CFR 194.22 During the 2012 inspection the EPA inspector evaluated the quality assurance program and found it to be adequate. SAT

3 Does DOE demonstrate that the results of the groundwater monitoring program are reported annually? (CCA, App. MON, Page MON-22) Objective evidence given in the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2010, DOE/WIPP-11-2225, (ASER). The document provides annual groundwater elevations for 47 wells completed in the Culebra and used this
well data to create the Culebra regional and local potentiometric maps
around the WIPP LWB. SAT

Checklist for Waste Activity Mo nitoring Commitments – July 2012

Monitoring Commitments Waste Activity Parameters
# Question Comment (Objective Evidence) Result 1 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented plans/programs/procedures to measure -

a) Waste Activity?

(CCA, Volume 1, Table 7-7; App MON, Table MON-1) 40 CFR 194.42 (c) and (e) WIPP Waste Data System Program and Data Management Plan , WP 08- NT.01 Revision 22 (EPA Inspection
ID: KME-M2012-WACT01describes the programmatic plan used to monitor and store waste activity information. The protocol sued to collect, process and store the waste activity is described in . Yearly reporting of waste activity is provided in Annual SAT27 Change Repor t 2009/2010, Table 3 (DOE/WTS November 15, 2010. EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012- WACT002).

2 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented an effective quality assurance program for item 1? (CCA, App WAP, page C-30) 40 CFR 194.22 During the 2012 inspection the EPA inspector evaluated the quality assurance program and found it to be adequate. SAT

3 Does DOE demonstrate that the results of the waste activity parameters are reported annually? (CCA Volume, Section 7.2.4 Reporting) Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Report -(EPA Inspection ID: KMEM2012-WACT02) verifies that these parameters are updated and reported annually. SAT

Checklist for Drilling Rate Moni toring Commitments – July 2012

Monitoring Commitments Drilling Related Parameters
# Question Comment (Objective Evidence) Result 1 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented plans/programs/procedures to measure -

a) Drilling Rate; and

b) Probability of Encountering a Castile
Brine Reservoir?

(CCA, Volume 1, Table 7-7; App MON, Table MON-1) 40 CFR 194.42 (c) and (e) The Delaware Basin Drilling
Surveillance Plan , WP 02-PC.02 Rev 4 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012– DB02), documents the program to measure, record, report, and the QA requirements for these activities. Quality assurance requirements are
documented in Section 7.0 of WP 02-
PC.02 Rev 4. The Delaware Basin Drilling Database Upgrade Process WP 02-EC3002 Rev 5 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012–DB01) documents the process used to update
databases with information from
various commercial and state sources. Drilling rate and Castile brine encounter data are reported annually in
the Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual Report DOE/WIPP 11-2308 (EPA Inspection ID: KME-M2012– DB10) in Sections 2.5 and 2.6.

WIPP staff discussed changes during the past year. DB staff reported on SAT28 brine encounters, drilling rate calculations, and provided maps ofdrilling activities near WIPP (KMEM2012-DB03, KME-M2012-DB06,KME-M2012-DB07, and KMEM2012-DB09). Staff also provided the latest listing of the New Mexico and Texas well databases (KME-M2012- DB04, KME-M2012-DB05). They demonstrated that DOE is adequately monitoring these parameters through the Delaware Basin monitoring

program. 2 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented an effective quality assurance program for item 1 above? (CCA, App DMP, page DMP-9) 40
CFR 194.22 During this inspection the EPA inspector evaluated the quality assurance program and found it to be adequate. SAT

3 Does DOE demonstrate that the results of the drilling related parameters are reported annually? (CCA Volume, Section 7.2.4 Reporting; App DMP, page DMP-9) Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual Report, December 2011, DOE/WIPP11-2308 Section 6.0 documents that results are reported annually.
DOE/WIPP-11-2308 verifies that these parameters are updated and reported annually. SAT29 Checklist for Subsidence Monitoring Commitments – July 2012

Monitoring Commitments Subsidence Measurements
# Question Comment (Objective Evidence) Result 1 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented plans/programs/procedures to measure -

a) Subsidence Measurement?

(CCA, Volume 1, Table 7-7; App MON, Table MON-1) 40 CFR 194.42 (c) and (e) Demonstration is provided via the implementation of the subsidence survey program as given in WIPP Underground and Surface Surveying Program WP 09-ES.01, Rev. 5 (EPA Inspection ID:KME-M2012-SB01 SAT

2 Does DOE demonstrate that they have implemented an effective quality assurance program for item 1 above? (CCA, App DMP, page DMP-9) 40
CFR 194.22 During this inspection the EPA inspector evaluated the quality assurance program and found it to be adequate. SAT

3 Does DOE demonstrate that the results
of the subsidence measurements are reported annually? (CCA Volume, Section 7.2.4 Reporting;) The results of this program are reported annually in the WIPP Subsidence Monument Leveling Survey – 2011 , DOE/WIPP 12-2293 SAT30 This Page Intentionally Blank31AttachmentC:DocumentsReviewedDocuments Received and Reviewed During Inspection194.42 MonitoringInspectionJuly 2012EPA Inspection ID#Documents TitleDOE ID#SourceHydrologic Documents - Groundwater MonitoringKME-M2012-GW01WIPP Insp July 17 2012 DOE Presentation(Environmental Monitoring and Hydrology)N/ADOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW02WIPP Groundwater Monitoring Program PlanWP 02-1, Rev. 11DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW03Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Environmental MonitoringPlanDOE/WIPP-99-2194DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW04Field Parameter Measurements and Final SampleCollectionWP 02-EM1010 Rev 0DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW05Administrative Processes for Environmental Monitoringand Hydrology ProgramsWP 02-EM3001 Rev16DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW06Pressure Density SurveyWP 02-EM1021 Rev 8DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW07Groundwater Level MeasurementWP 02-EM1014 Rev 6DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW08Data Review for the Annual Culebra GroundwaterReportWP 02-EM1025 Rev 4DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW09EM&H Field Work and Implementation of the Land UseRequestWP 02-EM1024 Rev 5DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW10Water Level Data Handling and ReportingWP 02-EM1026 Rev 4DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW11Integrated SampleControl PlanWP 02-EM.02 Rev 3DOE/WIPP32KME-M2012-GW12Electric Submersible Pump OperationWP 02-EM1002 Rev 5DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GW13Analysis Report for Preparation of 2011 CulebraPotentiometric Surface Contour MapERMS 557633SNL/WIPPMonitoring ofWaste ActivitiesKME-M2012-WACT01WIPP Waste Data System Program and DataManagement PlanWP 08-NT.01 Rev 21DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-WACT02Annual Transuranic WasteInventory Report – 2011DOE/TRU-11-3425DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-WACT03Savannah River ShipmentSummary -SR120065Inspection queryDOE/WIPPKME-M2012-WACT004Los Alamos National Lab Shipment SummaryLA120110Inspection queryDOE/WIPPKME-M2012-WACT005Idaho National Lab Shipment Summary-IN120181Inspection queryDOE/WIPPKME-M2012-WACT06Argon National Lab Shipment Summary -AER12013Inspection queryDOE/WIPPKME-M2012-WACT07Argon National Lab ShipmentSummary -AER1204Inspection queryDOE/WIPPKME M2012 WACT08WDS Nuclide Report through 2012-07-18Inspection queryDOE/WIPPKME M2012 WACT10Waste Stream Profile Form Review and ApprovalProgramWP 08-NT.03Rev 12DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-WACT11Waste Data System User's ManualDOE/WIPP-09-3427DOE/WIPP33Rev 7KME-M2012-WACT12Waste Data System Software Verification andValidation PlanWP 08-NT.05 Rev 11DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-WACT13Waste Data System Configuration Management andSoftware Quality Assurance ProgramWP 08-NT.04 Rev 19DOE/WIPPDelaware Basin DocumentsKME-M2012 DB01Delaware Basin DrillingDatabase Upgrade ProcessWP 02-EC3002 Rev.5DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB02Delaware Basin Surveillance PlanWP 02-PC.02 Rev 4DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB03New Well Drilled in Northern Portion of Delaware Basin(Inspection query)DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB04New Mexico Hydrocarbon 2012.xlsx(Inspection query)DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB05Texas Hydrocarbon 2012.xlsx(Inspection query)DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB06Well Status - One MileBuffer 7-10-2012.pdf(Inspection query)DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB07DBM-55-2012. pdf(Inspection query)DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB08Delaware Basin Quarterly Report (June-2012) .pdfDelaware Basin 2012Qtrly ReportDOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB09WEL Status - One Mile Buffer 7-10-2012.pdf(Inspection query)DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB10Delaware Basin Monitoring Annual ReportDOE/WIPP-11-2308DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB11Delaware Basin DrillingDatabase Upgrade ProcessWP 02-EC3002 Rev 5DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-DB12Delaware Basin EPA Presentation July 17, 2012N/ADOE/WIPP34Subsidence DocumentsKME-M2012-SB01WIPP Underground and Surface Surveying ProgramWP 09-ES.01, Rev. 5DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-SB02Subsidence Survey Data Acquisition ReportWP 09-ES4001, Rev2DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-SB03WIPP Panel Closure PlanWP 09-ES.02, Rev 2DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-SB04WIPP Subsidence MonumentLeveling Survey 2011DOE/WIPP 12-2293DOE/WIPPGeotechnicalKME-M2012-GT01Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011,Vol 1DOE/WIPP-12-3484,Vol. 1DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GT02Geotechnical Analysis Report for July 2010 – June 2011,Vol 2DOE/WIPP-12-3484,Vol. 2DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT03Geologic and Fracture Mapping of Facility Horizon DriftsWP 07-EU1001 Rev 3DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT04Geologic Core LoggingWP 07-EU1002 Rev 0DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT05Manually Acquired Geomechanical Instrument DataWP 07-EU1301 Rev 7DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT06Geomechanical InstrumentData ProcessingWP 07-EU1303 Rev 4DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT07Installing Convergence Reference PointsWP 07-EU1304 Rev 6DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT08Installing Multiposition Borehole Rod ExtensometersWP 07-EU1305 Rev 2DOE/WIPP35KME-M2012 GT09Installing Rock Bolt Load Rock CellsWP 07-EU1306 Rev 4DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT010Installing Wire Convergence MetersWP 07-EU1307 Rev 3DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT011Installing Wire Extension MetersWP 07-EU1308 Rev 2DOE/WIPPKME-M2012 GT012WIPP Core Storage, Handling, and DistributionWP 07-EU3504 Rev 3DOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GT013WIPP Cumulative Convergence Point for S3650-W0285N/ADOE/WIPPKME-M2012-GT014WIPP Convergence Rate –Point S3650-W0285N/ADOE/WIPPKME-M2012-QA001Software Screening and ControlWP 16-2 Rev 11DOE/WIPP