alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6651]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1824-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Oregon; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Oregon (FEMA-1824-DR), dated March 2, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: March 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Oregon is hereby amended to include the following area 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
March 2, 2009.

    Tillamook County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters);97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E9-6651 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Coronus Solar Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Jefferson Thachuk, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 10th day of December, 2010.








JEFFERSON THACHUKJefferson ThachukChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 10.6**

[exhibit141briofficelease_001.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_002.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_003.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_004.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_005.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_006.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_007.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_008.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_009.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_010.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_011.jpg]



---

[exhibit141briofficelease_012.jpg]
[No. 29251-3-II.

Division Two.

April 27, 2004.]

#### Neil Q. Good, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Retirement Systems, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 01-2-01602-1, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered August 26, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        49,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (155,349)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (45,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Supreme Court of Texas

═══════════════════════

Misc. Docket No. 21-9109 

═══════════════════════

__________________________________________________ 

Denial of Request to Retransfer Case from 

the Sixth Court of Appeals 

___________________________________________________ 

The Supreme Court denies the request to retransfer the following case from 

the Sixth Court of Appeals District, Texarkana, Texas: 

Case No. 06-20-00102-CV 

In the Interest of S.B., a Child 

ORDERED in Chambers, 

With the Seal thereof affixed at the City of 

Austin, this 9th day of September, 2021. 

_______________________________________ 

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK 

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,436]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 2, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Continental Automotive Systems U.S., Inc., Elkhart, Indiana.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7112 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 405-406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 3, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27,

[[Page 406]]

2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to 
Add Priority Mail Express Contract 58 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-91, CP2018-
133.

Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2017-28353 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Leonidas SOKOLOVSKI, et al., Appellants, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D15-1566.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 23, 2016.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Aaron Micquian WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3159

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SCOTT LEONARD HORN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2062

[ January 17, 201 9 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312016CF000132A

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jessica A. De Vera, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T.

Acuna, Assistant Att orney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STEPHEN ALAN WINGO, DOC #H51221, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4609

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 22, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands 

County; Anthony Ritenour, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Antonius R. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0836

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

This wfll a0 
Haa* Yor Xunsohlk, Q~sml~or, mgo I! 

F6J-l uoaoe T&U. artlol8r, 8, upcwa6a, Mod, La part, 

8e 141lal41 

“Art, 61694 

X0 fomlo shall b6 8aploysd ln any laundry 

r0r isorb than fifty-four hour8 in ana aalonder 

week8 tha houm ot au&i enployment to bo l o Wranged al to per&&the anploymaat of suoh roml* '0: rrnf tlrps a0 that sb* ohalL n& work 

mr6Wmnammxlmum of ele?en hour@ &win& the 

"Art. lab34 

a rOi&hh 6h6u b4 OJfiPw6al 

**a+4 

*%4 In aay lawdry or ol68aing and proubg 

~~abliahmant ior IIIWO tbaa flf'ty-four (54) 

hours irr-oar (1) MlonQr woks %~LO bourn of 

work to be w ~-4 a8 to psnnib t&e UnproymfmtarmmhiomUatanytirmnothddM 

&allworknare thanaamxlaum 

hourr alaring t&o ~twalty-anlr 

Qr al4 (1) day* 

a **ecu 

332 

FIRST ASSISTANT 

ATTORNEY GENERAL
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, James G. Petcoff, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Pointe Holdings Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Intentionally omitted.     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 14, 2005                                                   /s/ James G. Petcoff   James G. Petcoff   Chief Executive Officer
Lisa Louise SANDS, Appellant, v. Robert JAQUITH, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-559

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Statement of
Net Assets in Liquidation of Damson Birtcher Realty Income Fund-I and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         456,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               723,000
<PP&E>                                      34,327,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,050,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,984,000
<BONDS>                                      2,566,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,500,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,050,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Statement of Operations is not presented in liquidation basis of accounting.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Henry Alfred THOMAS, DC# 740998, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4763

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Vince COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2904

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6763

BRANDON ROBERTS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THOMAS SIRES, Captain; FRANK BISHOP, Warden; JEFFREY NINES, 

Assistant Warden; WILLIAM BOHER, Chief of Security; JACK JOHNS, Shift 

Commander; ANTHONY BRENT, H.O.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Ellen Lipton Hollander, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-02791-ELH)

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: May 1, 2023

Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6763 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in part without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The order Roberts seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6763 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Janiiaiy20, 2011 

Mr. Kevin Schlemnier 

United States Department of Transpoitation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemnier: 

At its regularnieeting held on January 11, 2011 (he Williamson County Airport Authority voted 

unanimously to recommend Cape Air and its EAS proposal providing for six (6) daily flights over a four 

(4) year contract term at Williamson County Regional Airport. 

Over the past year we have seen enplanement numbers increase steadily as a result of Cape Air's service. 

Affordable airfare, increased frequency of flights, reliable and efficient opernlions, substantial advertising 

and marketing efforts, and the codeshare with American Airlines are all reasons for this positive trend. 

The Airport has invested a great deal of resources in assisting Cape Air with these efforts. We look 

forward to continuing this partnership and fully support their request for a four (4) year contract in order 

to plan and direct our efforts over a longer term and maximize the return on our investments. We also 

support their proposed six (6) daily roundtrip flights, as we have noted in discussions that the reduced 

weekend schedule consistently has difficulty in meeting passenger demand, 

It should also be noted that Cape Air's proposal includes the establishment of a local City Ticket Office 

and a much needed ground shuttle for Cape Air passengers at St. Louis Lambeil International Airport. 

The ticket office concept is an outstanding community outreach initiative that will provide Cape Air even 

greater visibility in our region, and is further testament to their active participation at the local level. The 

ground shuttle addresses the need to efficiently move Cape Air passengera who have already been 

through security to another concourse or terminal at STL without having to exit and re-enter rlie sterile 

area. We request that if approved, Cape Aii *s new contract and subsidy request be put into effect 

immediately in order to implement these initiatives sooner rather than later. 

We are confident that Cape Air's proposal represents the best use of EAS funding while providing our 

region with qualit)' sei-vice and affordable access to the national air transportation system. If we can 

provide fuilher information please let me know. 

Sincerely, 

Douglas Kimme 

Airport Director 

WILLIAMSON COUNTY RFtilONAl. AlflPOHT • 10.-»00 TERMINAL OHIVIT, SUITS 200 - MARION, ILLINOIS 629;>9 

(Ota)<)g3-3y;)3»rAX (()l(J)'jyV-*)129*('mnil-. iiirportl'Omidwciit.nel 

www.wilcoairpOft.com