alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 98-2331
                          PHYLLIS HANDY,

                      Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                v.

                         CHARLES SARKIS,
                        GARY PIONTKOWSKI,
                          LOU GIULIANO,
                         KEVIN CONSIDINE,
                 BACK BAY RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.,
                    THE WESTWOOD GROUP, INC.,
                      FOXBORO HARNESS, INC.,
                  MANAGEMENT ACQUISITION CORP.,

                      Defendants, Appellees.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

           [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                     Torruella, Chief Judge,
                Stahl and Lipez, Circuit Judges.
                                
                                
                                
     Phyllis Handy on brief pro se.
     Joseph E. Kelleher and Kraus & Hummel LLP on brief for
appellees Gary Piontkowski and Management Acquisition Corporation. 
     Frank E. Bonanni and Crowley, Considine & Dray on brief for
appellees Charles Sarkis, Back Bay Restaurant Group, Inc., The
Westwood Group, Inc., and Foxboro Harness, Inc.




December 23, 1999



            Per Curiam. Plaintiff-appellant Phyllis Handy appeals
  from the dismissal of a complaint alleging violations of the
  Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C.
  �� 1961-1968, as well as various state law claims.  In lieu of
  a brief, appellant relies on a June 15, 1998 district court
  filing opposing a motion to dismiss.  Having reviewed that
  filing, we see no basis to set aside the judgment.
            Affirmed.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Organa Gardens International Inc..(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Leslye Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                /s/ Leslye Grindle
                               -------------------------------------
                               Leslye Grindle, Vice President and
                               Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2003

                                       21
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ryan Perry HARKEY, Appellant.

No. ED 106166

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: February 26, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Jessica Hathaway, 120 S. Central Avenue, Suite 130, St. Louis, MO 63105.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Justin A. Moody Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

Benjamin F. Lewis, District Judge

Ryan P. Harkey appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction for first-degree assault following a jury trial. Because there was no offer of proof before the trial court, we have no statement for which to review admissibility, and we find no plain error in the exclusion of a purported *89statement identified during arguments on pretrial motions. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME ARTURO VALDEZ-REYES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-74128

Agency No. A201-288-309

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 25, 2015** 

Before: McKEOWN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Jaime Arturo Valdez-Reyes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

SEP 04 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d

1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Valdez-Reyes

did not establish that he would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. 

See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (petitioner’s “desire to

be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by

gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”); see also Parussimova v.

Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (the REAL ID Act “requires that a

protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s

persecution”). Thus, we deny Valdez-Reyes’ petition as to his asylum and

withholding of removal claims.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Valdez-Reyes failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See

Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008). Thus, we deny ValdezReyes’ petition as to his CAT claim. 

2 13-74128
Finally, we lack jurisdiction to consider Valdez-Reyes’ cancellation of

removal claim because he did not exhaust it before the BIA. See Barron v.

Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 13-74128
LUCAS L. JENKINS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5419

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 14, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Michael Jones , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jillian Hope Reding, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., LEWIS and RAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 412 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 412

                     In the matter of Adam Schiff.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2023

Mrs. Luna submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                          Committee on Ethics

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                     In the matter of Adam Schiff.

    Resolved, That, pursuant to article I, section 5, clause 2 of the 
Constitution of the United States, Representative Adam Schiff, be, and 
he hereby is, expelled from the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 5th

day of August, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

BRANDON BENARD BRIGHT, Appellant

NO. 12-15-00045-CR; Trial Court No. 007-0861-14

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, 

it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the 

appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, 

and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to 

the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 29th day of September, 2015.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
| 1.     | Such      quarterly report of Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2008, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such annual report of Form 10-K for the quarter      ending August 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Artistry Publications,      Inc. |

|                        | CHINA      GREEN, INC. |                                                                           |
|-----------------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                   |                                                                           |   |
| Date:      October 13, 2009 | By:                    | /s/ Tai      Chi Yip                        |   |
|                        |                   | Tai      Chi YipChief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer  |   |
H. Res. 311 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 25, 2023. 

Whereas May 14, 2023, marks the 75th anniversary of the 

establishment of the State of Israel; 

Whereas, on May 14, 1948, the United States officially recognized Israel as a State; 

Whereas Israel has been designated by the United States 

Government as a major non-NATO ally; 

Whereas, in 2014, Congress designated Israel as a ‘‘major 

strategic partner’’; 

Whereas the United States and Israel have a close and robust 

bilateral relationship marked by strong people-to-people 

ties and close cooperation on a wide range of issues including defense, diplomacy, energy, cybersecurity, agriculture, science, and space; 

Whereas the United States and Israel have signed three 10- 

year memoranda of understanding, in which the United 

States committed to provide $26,700,000,000 between 

fiscal year 1999 and fiscal year 2008, $30,000,000,000 

between fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2018, and 

$38,000,000,000 between fiscal year 2019 and fiscal year 

2028; 
2 

•HRES 311 EH 

Whereas Congress has appropriated amounts in accordance 

with such memoranda of understanding, reflecting the 

two countries’ shared priorities in the region; 

Whereas, in late 2020 and early 2021, Israel reached agreements, known collectively as the Abraham Accords, to improve or normalize its relations with the United Arab 

Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan; and 

Whereas these agreements build upon the decades-long leadership of the United States and other governments in 

supporting efforts to broker peace treaties between Israel 

and Egypt and Israel and Jordan: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) encourages the United States and Israel to continue to deepen and expand bilateral cooperation across 

the full spectrum of economic, security, and civilian 

issues; 

(2) encourages the expansion and strengthening of 

the Abraham Accords to urge other nations to normalize 

relations with Israel and ensure that existing agreements 

reap tangible security and economic benefits for the citizens of those countries and all peoples in the region; 

(3) expresses continued support for security assistance to Israel as outlined in the United States-Israel 

Memorandum of Understanding to ensure that Israel 

can defend itself by itself; and 

(4) supports Israel’s robust involvement as an active member of the community of nations to benefit 
3 

•HRES 311 EH 

Israel and the United States as partners who share common values and a commitment to democracy. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

p0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138845

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138845 COA: 279264 Cheboygan CC: 06-003455-FC KENNETH RICHARD HARRISON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 14, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Freedom Environmental Services, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,


Michael Borish, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By /s/ Michael Borish


Michael Borish


Chief Financial officer


May 7, 2010
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-10847

In the Matter of: Acis Capital Management, L.P.,

Debtor,

-----------------------------

Neutra Limited; 

Appellant,

versus

Robin E. Phelan, Chapter 11 Trustee, 

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:19-CV-291

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 17, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-10847 Document: 00515903826 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2021
No. 19-10847

2

Before Smith, Ho, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Having thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs and arguments, we 

conclude the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s 

order confirming the Chapter 11 plan must be AFFIRMED. We further 

conclude the appeal of the district court’s plan injunction is moot and must 

be DISMISSED. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 19-10847 Document: 00515903826 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2021
Javaris BLUNT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-3541

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 05, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Axcan Intermediate Holdings Inc. (the Company) for
the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Frank A.G.M. Verwiel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: December 22, 2008



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Dr. Frank A.G.M. Verwiel         
|Dr. Frank A.G.M. Verwiel             
|President and Chief Executive Officer
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on a ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures to safeguard security of electricity supply and infrastructure investment’

(COM(2003) 740 final — 2003/0301 (COD))

(2005/C 120/22)

On 23 January 2004 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

The Section for Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 5 October 2004. The rapporteur was Mrs Sirkeinen.

At its 412th plenary session of 27 and 28 October 2004 (meeting of 28 October 2004), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 134 votes to 7 with 14 abstentions.

1.   Background

2.   The Commission proposal

3.   General comments

4.   Detailed comments

Brussels, 28 October 2004.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

APPENDIX

to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee

The following Section opinion text was rejected in favour of amendments adopted by the assembly but obtained at least one-quarter of the votes cast:

Point 1.8, last phrase:

‘Frequently added new legislation and in particular legislation allowing public interference in the markets do not create the necessary stable regulatory framework but, on the contrary, increases the investor's risk, delays investment and thereby increases prices.’

Outcome:

78 votes for deleting the phrase, 67 against and 9 abstentions.

----
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHAIRMAN AND CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Charles A. Fust, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     May 17, 2005         /s/ Charles A. Fust        Charles A. Fust    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
18