alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 33.2
 MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
 Company
  Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed
securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which
the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the Platform)
 Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to
the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed
by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following
criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii),
1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which
management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria).
 Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2010 (the Period).
  
    
    The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
    
    The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
    
    Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
  CITIBANK, N.A.By:
    /s/ Karen MontbachKaren MontbachIts:
    Managing Director
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(2005/C 188/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Aid No: XT 87/02

Member State: Germany

Region: Bavaria

Recipient: Sozialer Hilfsdienst Weiße Feder gemeinnützige GmbH, Munich

Legal basis: Bayerische Haushaltsordnung (BayHO)

Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999

EPPD zu Ziel 3

Ergänzendes Programmplanungsdokument Ziel 3

Total amount of aid granted to the recipient: Total eligible costs: EUR 295 794

ESF: EUR 54 786

Maximum aid intensity: 80 %

Date of implementation: October/November 2002

Payment of individual aid: Last payment expected to be in June 2004

Project duration: 1.1.2002 to 31.12.2003

Objective: This is a general training measure for unemployed mentally ill and mentally handicapped persons with a view to placement on the general labour market. The aim is to provide skills in maintenance work and housekeeping. The measure will help to provide transferable skills which will significantly improve the placement potential of the participants. The measure is based on the framework plan for general vocational skill acquisition measures for the handicapped and mentally ill in Bavarian integration firms/self-help firms of 18.7.2001.

Economic sector(s) concerned: Other services

Name and address of the granting authority: 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION.1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cosi, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the three month period ended April 2, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Merritt,Interim Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of the Company and I,William Koziel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Date: May 10, 2007 /s/ ROBERT MERRITT   Robert Merritt   Interim Chief ExecutiveOfficer, President andDirector      Date: May 10, 2007 /s/ WILLIAM KOZIEL   William Koziel   Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Cosi, Inc. and will be retained by Cosi, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before orafter the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.
#### SLOSBERG v. MANSFIELD. In re TRIMOUNT DREDGING CORPORATION.

No. 3793.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Dec. 3, 1942.

Harry Bergson, of Boston, Mass., and Josiah Greenstein, of Norwich, Conn., for appellant.

Thomas H. Walsh, of Boston, Mass., for appellee.

Before MAGRUDER, MAHONEY, and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court denying the appellant’s petition for leave to foreclose a mortgage which he holds on a parcel of real property owned by the Trimount Dredging Corporation of which the appellee is a trustee in proceedings for reorganization of the corporation.

It is set out in the verified petition, and .apparently not challenged by appellee at the hearing below, that the mortgage is in default, that taxes on the mortgaged property are in arrears, and that an impartial appraisal of the property by competent persons discloses that it is worth only slightly more than the present aggregate amount of the liens upon it. From this it is argued that the denial of the petition was arbitrary and unreasonable, and an abuse of discretion. If appellant wished to contend that upon the entire record of the reorganization proceedings pending before the District Court the decree in question was an abuse of discretion, appellant should have brought such record before us. All that the present record contains relative to the proceedings below are the petition and the decree thereon. We cannot say as a matter of law that regardless of what the other facts might be, the District Court committed an abuse of discretion in not permitting the mortgagee to foreclose.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed, with costs to the appellee.
APPENDIX I - PRODUCT L IS T

EPA Registration Number: Product Name 10807 - 74 MI STY DEL ETE 3% MUL TIPURPOSE SPRAY 10807 - 101 REPCO - TOX SPACE SPRAY I NSECTI CI DE 10807 - 107 FOG KI LL OI L BASE I NSECTI CIDE 10807 - 110 AQUA - KI LL IN SECTI CI DE
----

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/23-24/05 to constitute a reserve of administrators (A*5 — junior auditors) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovenian and Slovak citizenship

(Official Journal of the European Union C 135 A of 2 June 2005)

(2005/C 152 A/02)

On page 32, under Heading B:

for:

This test will be marked out of 100 (pass mark: 60).’

read:

This test will be marked out of 100 (pass mark: 60).’

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John Luft, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Carroll ShelbyInternational Inc.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)       designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)       evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)       presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)       all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)       any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: August  16, 2004 | /s/  JOHN  LUFT                        |   |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | President,  Chief Financial Officer and Director |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes approval of amendments to 13 Class III 
Tribal-State Gaming Compacts (Amendments). The 13 Class III Gaming 
Compacts are between the State of Arizona and each of the following 
Indian tribes, respectively: Ak-Chin Indian Community, Colorado River 
Indian Tribes, Cocopah Indian Tribe, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Fort 
Mojave Indian Tribe, Havasupai Indian Tribe, Hualapai Indian Tribe, 
Kaibab-Paiute Indian Tribe, Navajo Nation, Tohono O'odham Nation, White 
Mountain Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Tribe, and Zuni Tribe.

DATES: Effective Date: March 25, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula L. Hart, Acting Director, Office 
of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240. Telephone: (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. The approved Amendments are 
substantially identical. Generally, the Amendments consist of 
clarifications and minor changes to various sections of each tribe's 
current compact (which are also substantially identical). The 
Amendments change the destination and frequency of the tribes' payments 
from quarterly to yearly, based upon the individual gaming facility's 
fiscal year.

    Dated: March 6, 2009.
George T. Skibine,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Economic Development.
[FR Doc. E9-6585 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
----

Call(s) for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

Thematic priority area: ‘Aeronautics and Space’, ‘Sustainable Energy Systems’ and ‘Sustainable Surface Transport’

Call identifier: FP6-2005-TREN-4-Aero/FP6-2005-TREN-4

(2005/C 168/16)

----

(1)OJ L 232, 29.8.2002, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 24, 29.10.2002, p. 1

(3)  Commission Decision C(2002)4789, as modified by C(2003)577, C(2003)955, C(2003)1952, C(2003)343, C(2003)3555, C(2003)4609, C(2003)5183, C(2004)433, C(2004)2002, C(2004)2727, C(2004)324, C(2004)4178, C(2004)5286, C(2005)27, C(2005)961, and C(2005)2076, all decisions unpublished.

(4)OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 23.

(5)OJ L 248, of 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(6)OJ L 357, of 31.12.2002, p. 1.

(7)  C(2003)883 of 27.3.2003, as last modified by C(2004)1855 of 18.5.2004.

(8)  The EPSS is a tool to assist proposers to develop and submit their proposals electronically.

----

ANNEX

1.   Specific Programme: Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area

2.   Activities: 

3.   Call title: Periodic call in the area of ‘Aeronautics and Space’, ‘Sustainable energy systems’ and ‘Sustainable surface transport’.

4.   Call identifier: FP6-2005-TREN-4-Aero (for ‘Aeronautics and Space’)/FP6-2005-TREN-4 (for ‘Sustainable energy systems’ and ‘Sustainable surface transport’).

5.   Date of publication: 8 July 2005.

6.   Closure date(s): 4 November 2005 at 17.00 (Brussels local time) (for ‘Aeronautics and Space’) and 22 December 2005 at 17.00 (Brussels local time) (for ‘Sustainable energy systems’ and ‘Sustainable surface transport’).

7.   Total indicative budget: EUR 214 million, broken down as follows

‘Aeronautics and space’: EUR 53 million

‘Sustainable energy systems’: EUR 125 million

‘Sustainable surface transport’: EUR 36 million

8.   Areas called and Instruments: 

9.   Minimum number of participants (2): 

10.   Restriction on participation: None.

11.   Consortia agreements: 

12.   Evaluation procedure: 

13.   Evaluation criteria: See Annex B of the work programme for the applicable criteria (including their individual weights and thresholds and the overall threshold) per instrument.

14.   Indicative evaluation and contractual timetable: 

15.   Additional terms: 

----

(1)  IP = Integrated project; STREP = Specific targeted research project; CA = Coordination action; SSA = Specific support action.

(2)  MS = Member States of the EU; AS (incl. ACC) = Associated States; ACC = Associated candidate countries.

Any legal entity established in a Member State or Associated State and which is made up of the requested number of participant may be the sole participant in an indirect action.

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Jeffery C. Swank, as President of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Jeffery C. Swank                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jeffery C. Swank                                                                                                     |
| President (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                              |
| Date:  November 18, 2005                                                                                        |

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12840-12841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XO15


Taking and Exporting Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals 
Incidental to the Knik Arm Crossing

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Knik Arm Bridge Toll Authority 
(KABATA), 550 West 7th Ave, Suite 1850, Anchorage, Alaska, 99501, has 
withdrawn its application for regulations and subsequent Letters of 
Authorization (LOAs) regarding the harassment of marine mammals 
incidental to construction of the Knik Arm Crossing.

ADDRESSES: The documents related to this action are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301) 713-2289; fax (301) 427-2521; and
    Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668; phone 
(907) 586-7221; fax (907) 586-7249.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaclyn Daly, (301) 713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 23, 2006, a notice was published 
in the Federal Register (71 FR 49433) that an application for 
regulations governing the incidental take of marine mammals had been 
filed by KABATA. The Knik Arm Crossing is a proposed bridge across Knik 
Arm, linking Anchorage and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Construction 
of the bridge would result in the harassment of marine mammals, 
including, but not limited to, the endangered Cook Inlet beluga whale 
(Dephinapterus leucas). On March 12,

[[Page 12841]]

2009, KABATA submitted a letter to NMFS announcing the withdrawal of 
their request for regulations and subsequent LOAs. Consequently, NMFS 
has terminated the processing of KABATA's application.

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-6635 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Ricci Land WELCH, as Personal Representative and ON BEHALF OF the ESTATE OF Marcel JADOTTE, Deceased, Appellant, v. Marie GEORGE, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1773

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1


                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State
         Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
         2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
         hereof (the "Report'), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
         U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
         Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and
                           Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company



                                        Date: November 14, 2006

                                        /s/ STEVEN A. ROSSO
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven A. Rosso
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       33
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00042-CV

$5,612.00 U.S. CURRENCY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. S-13423-16

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On January 3, 2018, Appellant Damon Gonzalez filed a notice of his intent 

to appeal the default judgment entered against him on February 28, 2017. By 

letter dated February 1, 2018, we notified Appellant of our concern that we may 

not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. As no postjudgment motions were filed to extend the 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

appellate deadline, the notice of appeal was due March 30, 2017. See id. We 

cautioned Appellant that his appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction 

unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal within 

10 days. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

Appellant filed a response but did not provide us with any basis of 

jurisdiction over his appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); see also In re D.A., No. 02-15-00346-

CV, 2015 WL 9244637, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 17, 2015, no pet.) 

(mem. op.) (“The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court,

and absent a timely-filed notice of appeal or extension request, we must dismiss 

the appeal.”).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 8, 2018