alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Lee, Arthur

To: Heggs, Angela

Subject: FW: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Date: Monday, February 09, 2015 10:26:43 AM

-----Original Message-----

From: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG [mailto:steve.nash.1.ctr@us.af.mil]

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 2:57 PM

To: Lee, Arthur

Subject: RE: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Mr. Lee,

Actually have another question I didn't consider earlier. If, after all the responses came back and the

proposal passes, would extension cords in the field be grandfathered?

Shane Nash

Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Burgos Group, LLC.

Air Force Safety Center

Kirtland AFB, NM

DSN 246-0827/COMM 505-846-0827

-----Original Message-----

From: Lee, Arthur [mailto:ALee@cpsc.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:33 PM

To: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG

Subject: RE: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Mr. Nash

The proposed rule requires extension cords within the scope of the rule to meet all applicable safety

characteristics outlined in the proposed rule. The absence of any one of the characteristics would make

the product a substantial product hazard. See 80 FR 5701.

I hope this answers your question. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Arthur Lee

US Consumer Product Safety Commission

Directorate for Engineering Sciences

Division of Electrical Engineering

5 Research Place

Rockville, MD 20850

301 987-2008

alee@cpsc.gov

-----Original Message-----

From: NASH, STEVE D CTR USAF HAF AFSEC/SEG [mailto:steve.nash.1.ctr@us.af.mil]

Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:30 PM

To: Lee, Arthur

Subject: Docket No. CPSC-2015-0003 Extension Cords

Good morning, sir!
I am seeking clarification to the proposed rule. Is the proposal for extension cords to have ALL 4 of the

readily observable characteristics or at least 1 characteristic? Your help in clearing this up is greatly

appreciated.

Thank you!

Shane Nash

Occupational Safety and Health Specialist Burgos Group, LLC.

Air Force Safety Center

Kirtland AFB, NM

DSN 246-0827/COMM 505-846-0827

*****!!!

Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions expressed in this

e-mail (and any attachments) are solely those of the author and do

not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

Copies of product recall and product safety information can be sent

to you automatically via Internet e-mail, as they are released by

CPSC. To subscribe or unsubscribe to this service go to the following

web page: http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Newsroom/Subscribe

*****!!!
WHEELING.

#### Witz *et al.*v. Lockridge *et al.*

Submitted January 20, 1894.

Decided June 11, 1894.

(Holt, Judge, Absent.)

Syllabus same as in *Guggenheimer*v. *Lockridge*(decided this day) 19 S. E. Rep. 874.

H. S. Rucker, for appellants.

L. M. McClintic, for appellee Lockridge.

W. M. & J. T. McAllister, for appellee First National Bank, of Buena Vista.

*464BRANNON, PRESIDENT :

This was a chaucery suit in Pocahontas Circuit Court by "Witz, Beidler & Co. against Ii. M. Lockridge and others, to collect a debt due plaintiffs upon joint notes made by H. M. Lockridge and J. B. Lockridge, and to avoid fraudulent conveyances of land and subject the land thereto. The facts stated in the original and amended bills are the same, *mutntis*mutandis, as in the case of *Guggenheimer*v. Lockridge, *[supra*p. 457). The amended bill in this case exhibits a deed from Moore lo Lockridge bearing date after the commencement of this suit, whereas it is dated before the commencement of the suit of G-uggenheimer & Co.; but the bill states distinctly that such conveyance had been made ; and the date of a deed is only *prima facie*the time of its execution.

For reasons given in the case of Guggeuludmer we affirm the decree of the Circuit Court dismissing the case without prejudice to auothef suit.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of EcoLiveGreen, Corp., (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Len
Bryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2010                   /s/ Len Bryan
                                       -------------
                                       Len Bryan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
EX PARTE Ronnie L. COLVIN

CR-15-1007

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 24, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# 1*^3-/¥

COA # 07-12-00416-CR Preston Gerard Walker v. The 

### STYLE: State of Texas COA DISPOSITION: 

### Modified/Affirmed 

### OFFENSE: 3 

### COUNTY: Potter TRIAL COURT: 320th District Court DATE: 08/15/2014 Publish: No TC CASE #: 63,870-D



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Preston Gerard Walker v. The State STYLE: ofTexas 

## PftO SE FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### DATE: JUDGE: Petition CCA#: 

# I*fe3-/V CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
```

Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the amended Quarterly report of Stock Market Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard Smitten, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
       Company.

/s/ Richard Smitten
    Richard Smitten
    President, CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
    Accounting Officer

    November 7, 2003
```
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 7, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Ronald C. Schmeiser                  |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Ronald      C. Schmeiser                 |
|                   |   | President,      Chief Executive          |
|                   |   | Officer      and Chief Financial Officer |
|                   |   |                                     |

----
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 and;2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 Date:
August 6, 2008
    
    By:
    /s/ Juan J. RománJuan J. RománVice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A128
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ramon M. Ruiz-Comas, President and Chief Executive Officer of Triple-S
Management Corporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period ended
     March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and;

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Corporation.

Date: May 12, 2006                   By:  /s/ Ramon M. Ruiz-Comas
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Ramon M. Ruiz-Comas
                                          President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Carlton Parfitt, Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Avalon Energy Corporation, a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 14,2006



/s/ Carlton Parfitt

-------------------

Carlton Parfitt



Director and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
13.2
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B)
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report ofGolden Green Enterprises
Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Edward Meng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and results of
operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
 /s/ Edward MengName:
                Edward
      MengTitle:
                Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal
                  Financial
      Officer)Date:
                October
      20, 2009
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of this Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00368-CR 

ALBERTO RUIZ, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 69th District Court 

Moore County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 4976, Honorable Ron Enns, Presiding 

 

March 4, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Before the court is a motion for voluntary dismissal, filed by counsel for appellant 

Alberto Ruiz. In its certification of appellant’s right of appeal pursuant to appellate rule 

25.2(a)(2), the trial court stated that appellant’s case was a plea-bargain case and 

appellant had no right of appeal. By letter of February 26, 2015, we notified counsel 

that unless an amended certificate indicating appellant had the right of appeal was filed 

by March 17, the appeal would be dismissed. 
2

The motion for voluntary dismissal is signed only by appellant’s counsel. The 

motion states appellant was deported, remains outside the United States and thus is 

unable to sign the motion for voluntary dismissal, as required by appellate rule 42.2(a). 

In the motion, counsel acknowledges that appellant is unable to obtain a certification he 

has a right of appeal.

The motion continues by stating that since involuntary dismissal is imminent 

under rule 25.2(d), counsel requests for purposes of expediency that we invoke 

appellate rule 2, suspend rule 42.2(a)’s requirement that appellant sign the motion, and 

dismiss the appeal. 

The requirement that the appellant in a criminal case sign a motion for voluntary 

dismissal of the appeal is expressly stated in the rules that govern our practice, and we 

do not lightly suspend it. We decline to do so in this case. The motion before us gives 

no indication appellant is aware of its filing or authorizes dismissal of his appeal. We 

therefore deny the motion for voluntary dismissal.

However, because appellant has not obtained an amended certificate indicating 

a right of appeal, and has acknowledged his inability to do so, we will dismiss the 

appeal under appellate rule 25.2(d). See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) (“The appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not 

been made part of the record under these rules”); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 

680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain 

whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), 

must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the 
3

appeal”); TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f) (a court of appeals may render judgment dismissing the 

appeal). For that reason, the appeal is dismissed.

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
Paul E. REHDER and Patricia Lucille Rehder, Appellants, v. NAPLES ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Oregon limited partnership, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4124

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13419-13420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology


Manufacturing Extension Partnership Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app., 
notice is hereby given that the Manufacturing Extension Partnership 
(MEP) Advisory Board, National Institute of Standards and Technology 
(NIST), will meet Sunday, April 19, 2009, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. This 
meeting is being held in conjunction with MEP's National Conference in 
Orlando, Florida. The MEP Advisory Board is composed of ten members 
appointed by the Director of NIST who were selected for their expertise 
in the area of industrial extension and their work on behalf of smaller 
manufacturers. The Board was

[[Page 13420]]

established to fill a need for advice and assessment on MEP's plans, 
strategies and performance. MEP is a unique program consisting of 
centers across the United States and Puerto Rico, with partnerships at 
the State, Federal, and local levels. The Board provides input and 
advice on MEP's programs, plans, and policies. At this meeting, the 
Board will address MEP's sustainability initiatives and efforts to 
deploy services into the U.S. manufacturing economy. The Board's agenda 
may include other Board business.

DATES: The meeting will convene April 19, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. and will 
adjourn at 4 p.m. on April 19, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Orlando World Center Marriott 
Resort & Convention Center, 8701 World Center Drive, Orlando, Florida 
32821. Any interested person wishing to attend this meeting should 
submit his or her name, e-mail address and phone number to Susan Hayduk 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#364543455758185e574f52435d76585f454218515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95e6e0e6f4fbbbfdf4ecf1e0fed5fbfce6e1bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>, (301) 975-5614) no later than c.o.b. April 9, 
2009. Those who are unable to attend in person are invited to submit 
written statements to the MEP Advisory Board. Please send your 
statements to Karen Lellock at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8de6ecffe8e3a3e1e8e1e1e2eee6cde3e4fef9a3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c777d6e79723270797070737f775c72756f68327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Lellock, Manufacturing Extension 
Partnership, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-4800, telephone number (301) 975-4269.

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
Richard Kayser,
Chief Scientist.
 [FR Doc. E9-6906 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of eCrypt Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Brad Lever, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  July 1, 2011 /s/Brad Lever, Chief Executive Officer
“(i) Special Allocations. Any deduction or loss attributable to amounts paid by, orobligations or expenses incurred by, the Partnership that are described in clauses (a) or (b) ofthe definition of IDR Available Cash, shall be allocated to the Partners in proportion to theirrelative IDR Percentage Interests.”     Section 2. Prior Conduct. The parties hereto hereby agree on behalf of thePartnership and the Partners that all amounts withheld or reserved by the Partnership fromdistribution to, and all amounts distributed to, the Partners prior to the date hereof are herebyapproved, ratified and confirmed in all respects.     Section 3. General Authority. The appropriate officers of the General Partner arehereby authorized to make such further clarifying and conforming changes to the PartnershipAgreement as they deem necessary or appropriate, and to interpret the Partnership Agreement, togive effect to the intent and purpose of this Amendment No. 2.
 

 
     Section 4. Ratification of Partnership Agreement. Except as expressly modified andamended herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Partnership Agreement shall remain in fullforce and effect.     Section 5. Governing Law. This Amendment No. 2 will be governed by and construed inaccordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
 

 
     **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the General Partner and the Limited Partners have executed this AmendmentNo. 2 as the date first written above.      **GENERAL PARTNER:**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4339-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4339-DR), dated September 20, 2017, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued December 6, 2017.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective November 15, 2017.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2017-28192 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Eliot Ivan BERNSTEIN, Individually, as Trustee f/b/o D.B., Ja. B and Jo. B under the Simon L. Bernstein Trust Dtd 9/13/12, and on behalf of his minor children D.B., Ja. B and Jo. B, Appellant, v. Ted BERNSTEIN, as Trustee of the Shirley Bernstein Trust Agreement dated May 20, 2008, as amended, Alexandra Bernstein, Eric Bernstein, Michael Bernstein, Molly Simon, Pamela B. Simon, Individually and as Trustee f/b/o Molly Simon under the Simon L. Bernstein Trust Dtd 9/13/12, Jill Iantoni, Individually, as Trustee f/b/o J.I. under the Simon L. Bernstein Trust Dated 9/13/12 and on behalf of her minor child J.I., Max Friedstein, Lisa Friedstein, Individually, as Trustee f/b/o Max Friedstein and C.F., under the Simon L. Bernstein Trust Dtd 9/13/12, and on behalf of her minor child C.F., Appellees.

No. 4D16-3314

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 21, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.