alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Laszlo HATSCHEK, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., The Inverrary Association, Inc., Isles of Inverrary Condominium Association, Inc., Cach, LLC, and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Appellees.

No. 4D16-3702

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 620 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 620

  A resolution seeking justice for the Japanese citizens abducted by 
                              North Korea.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2023

  Mr. Williams of New York (for himself and Ms. Tokuda) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  A resolution seeking justice for the Japanese citizens abducted by 
                              North Korea.

Whereas the United States Government recognizes that North Korea was abducting 
        Japanese citizens since the 1970s;
Whereas, in September 2002, North Korea admitted that it had abducted Japanese 
        citizens and promised to prevent further recurrences;
Whereas, in October of 2002, only 5 abductees were returned to Japan after being 
        held prisoner for 24 years, despite the explicit commitment of North 
        Korea to investigate what had happened to all abductees;
Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights upholds the basic principles 
        of liberty and freedom enshrined within the United States Constitution 
        and Bill of Rights;
Whereas human rights awareness is essential to the realization of fundamental 
        freedoms and contributes to promoting equality, preventing conflict and 
        human rights violations, and enhancing participation in democratic 
        processes;
Whereas these abductions of Japanese citizens by North Korea directly conflict 
        with the basic principle of liberty and freedom; and
Whereas there have been several attempts at dialogue between North Korea and 
        Japanese leaders in an effort to yield stable results: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) calls on North Korea to release any abducted foreign 
        nationals, including those from Japan;
            (2) urges North Korea to return the remains and provide 
        information on any deceased abductees;
            (3) urges North Korea to make such restitution as 
        appropriate regarding abductees; and
            (4) urges North Korea to apologize and permanently cease 
        such activities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Robert J. Mottern  Robert J. Mottern, Chief Financial Officer  Date:  November 20, 2008
#### E. B. Fox, *Committee, etc. v.*Josie Starbuck *et al.*

(No. 7790)

Submitted April 24, 1934.

Decided May 8, 1934.

*J. Raymond Gordon*and *W. C, Hwytbe,*for appellants.

*A. D. Daly,*for appellee First National Bank of Hinton.

*R. F. Dunlap, W. H. Sawyers*and *W. A. Brown,*for other appellees.

Litz, Judge:

This suit was instituted in August, 1932, by E. B. Fox, sheriff of Summers 'County, and, as such, committee of Peter Cales, a mental defective, to cancel a deed dated August 4, 1931, from Peter Cales and A. V. Cales, his wife, to defendant, Josie Starbuck, conveying valuable real and personal estate in consideration of the grantee agreeing to support the grantors during their natural., lives and to provide a decent burial for .them after death. The alleged mental incapacity of Peter Cales and fraud practiced upon him by the grantee at the time of the execution of the conveyance constitute .the basis for' relief.

Petér Cales was adjudged a mental defective November 17, 1931, The circuit court entered a consent decree, *40January 18, 1933, confirming the deed and dismissing the bill, upon the admission of plaintiff that Peter Cales was, at the time of making the deed mentally competent and had not been induced by deception or undue influence on the part of the grantee to execute the instrument. August 17, 1933, Peter Cales died, and, thirteen days later the suit was revived in the names of his heirs at law, as plaintiffs, in contemplation of an application by them for an appeal from the consent decree to this court.

The question presented is whether the committee of a mental defective as plaintiff in a suit may, by consent, waive or release the alleged rights of his charge. The answer must be in the negative. The. committee in such situation may no doubt have the suit dismissed, without prejudice, when he reaches an honest conclusion that it is not maintainable, but he cannot “waive or admit away any substantial rights of, or consent to anything which may be substantially prejudicial to, his ward.” 32 C. J. 777; *Clark*v. *Knight,*(Fla.) 94 So. 671; *Calloway*v. *Dinsmore,*83 Va. 309, 2 S. E. 517. Tested by this rule, the decree complained of is clearly erroneous. It will, therefore, be set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

*Reversed and remanded.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 61 (Wednesday, April 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7245]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 27, 2009.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, on or 
after the publication date of this notice. Copies of the submission(s) 
may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer 
listed. Comments regarding this information collection should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before May 1, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

Bureau of Public Debt (BPD)

    OMB Number: 1535-0036.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application by Voluntary Guardian of Incapacitated Owner of 
United States Savings Bonds/Notes.
    Forms: PDF-2513.
    Description: Used by voluntary guardian of incapacitated bond 
owner(s) to establish right to act on behalf of owner.
    Respondents: Individuals or Households.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 2,600 hours.

    OMB Number: 1535-0013.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Claim For Lost, Stolen or Destroyed U.S. Savings Bonds and 
Supplemental Statement For U.S. Securities.
    Forms: PD-F-1048, PD-F-2243.
    Description: Used by owner or others having knowledge to request 
substitute securities or payment of lost, stolen or destroyed 
securities.
    Respondents: Individuals or Households.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 26,400 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Brian Lallemont (304) 480-8150, Bureau of the 
Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed (202) 395-7873, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-7245 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
Joseph HUGGINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2286

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 163A/5 Ιο

| | ISSN 1725-2415 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 163A |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 48ό έτος5 Ιουλίου 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2415

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 163A

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

48ό έτος5 Ιουλίου 2005

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Πληροφορίες |
| | Επιτροπή |
| 2005/C 163A/1 | Προκήρυξη κενής θέσης Διευθυντή του Ευρωπαϊκού Οργανισμού για την Ασφάλεια και την Υγεία στην Εργασία (Βαθμός Α*14) COM/2005/10001 | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

III   Πληροφορίες

Επιτροπή

2005/C 163A/1

Προκήρυξη κενής θέσης Διευθυντή του Ευρωπαϊκού Οργανισμού για την Ασφάλεια και την Υγεία στην Εργασία (Βαθμός Α*14) COM/2005/10001

1

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

III Πληροφορίες

Επιτροπή

| 5.7.2005 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CA 163/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2005

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CA 163/1

---

Προκήρυξη κενής θέσης

ΔΙΕΥΘΥΝΤΉ

του Ευρωπαϊκού Οργανισμού για την Ασφάλεια και την Υγεία στην Εργασία

(Βαθμός Α*14)

COM/2005/10001

(2005/C 163 A/01)

Ο Ευρωπαϊκός Οργανισμός για την Ασφάλεια και την Υγεία στην Εργασία προτίθεται να προβεί στο διορισμό διευθυντή.

Οι υποψήφιοι πρέπει να είναι υπήκοοι ενός κράτους μέλους της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.

Ο διευθυντής θα διορισθεί από το διοικητικό συμβούλιο του Οργανισμού από κατάλογο υποψηφίων που επιλέγονται και προτείνονται από την Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή. Οι μισθοί και οι όροι απασχόλησης είναι εκείνοι που ορίζονται στον κανονισμό υπηρεσιακής κατάστασης για τους υπαλλήλους βαθμού A*14 των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων. Ο Οργανισμός και η Επιτροπή εφαρμόζουν πολιτική ίσων ευκαιριών.

Η περιγραφή των καθηκόντων, οι αιτήσεις υποψηφιότητας και οι οδηγίες για την αποστολή αιτήσεων μπορούν να τηλεφορτωθούν από τις ακόλουθες διευθύνσεις στο Διαδίκτυο:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_fr.htm

ή

http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/news/2005/jul/bilbao_vacancy_en.html

Η προθεσμία παραλαβής των αιτήσεων είναι η 10η Αυγούστου 2005 (ως ημερομηνία αποστολής θεωρείται η ημερομηνία της σφραγίδας του ταχυδρομείου).

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-4000

___________

In re: Michael Dey; Justin Victoria; * On Petition for Writ

Jeannemarie Durocher, * of Mandamus

*

Petitioners. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: January 4, 2007

Filed: January 17, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Dey, Justin Victoria, and Jeannemarie Durocher (collectively,

petitioners) filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the

district court to vacate its orders refusing to quash the trial subpoenas served to

petitioners. 

In the underlying matter, which is not related to the issues on appeal, a plaintiff

sued Wyeth, Inc. and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc (collectively, Wyeth). The plaintiff

subpoenaed the petitioners, who are employees of Wyeth and were served more than

100 miles from the place of the trial. The petitioners filed motions to quash the

subpoenas arguing the subpoenas were not properly served pursuant to Federal Rule
1

“Subject to [Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii)], a subpoena may be served at any place

within the district of the court by which it is issued, or at any place without the district

that is within 100 miles of the place of the deposition, hearing, trial, production, or

inspection specified in the subpoena or at any place within the state where a state

statute or rule of court permits service of a subpoena issued by a state court of general

jurisdiction sitting in the place of the deposition, hearing, trial, production, or

inspection specified in the subpoena.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(2)

-2-

of Civil Procedure 45(b)(2).1

 The district court denied petitioners’ motions to quash.

Petitioners filed a petition for writ of mandamus. 

The writ of mandamus “is a ‘drastic and extraordinary’ remedy ‘reserved for

really extraordinary causes.’” Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the D.C., 542 U.S. 367,

380 (2004) (quoting Ex Parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258, 259-60 (1947)). “To ensure that

mandamus remains an extraordinary remedy, petitioners must show that they lack

adequate alternative means to obtain the relief they seek and carry the burden of

showing that their right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable.” Mallard v.

U.S. Dist. Ct. for the S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989) (citations, quotation

marks, and alterations omitted). Here, assuming arguendo petitioners are entitled to

relief, petitioners have adequate alternative means to obtain relief because petitioners

can refuse to comply with the subpoenas, endure contempt sanctions, if any, and

immediately appeal those sanctions. Gialde v. Time, Inc., 480 F.2d 1295, 1300 (8th

Cir. 1973) (citing United States v. Ryan, 402 U.S. 530, 532-33 (1971)); see also U.S.

Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc., 487 U.S. 72, 76 (1988)

(“The order finding a nonparty witness in contempt is appealable notwithstanding the

absence of a final judgment in the underlying action.”). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. 

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)


National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Initial Review 
Group (NCIPC IRG)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), CDC announces the following meeting of 
the aforementioned review group:

    Times and Dates:
6 p.m.-6:30 p.m., April 13, 2009 (Open).
6:30 p.m.-8 p.m., April 13, 2009 (Closed).
8 a.m.-5 p.m., April 14, 2009 (Closed).
8 a.m.-5 p.m., April 15, 2009 (Closed).

    Place: Doubletree Atlanta Buckhead (Smoke Free), 3342 Peachtree 
Road, NE., Atlanta, GA 30326, Telephone: (404) 231-1234.
    Status: Portions of the meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), 
Title 5, U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management 
Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Section 10(d) of 
Public Law 92-463.
    Purpose: This group is charged with providing advice and 
guidance to the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, 
and the Director, CDC, concerning the scientific and technical merit 
of grant and cooperative agreement applications received from 
academic institutions and other public and private profit and 
nonprofit organizations, including State and local government 
agencies, to conduct specific injury research that focuses on 
prevention and control.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications submitted in response to 
Fiscal Year 2009 Requests for Applications related to the following 
individual research announcement: CE09-002, Adaptations of Evidence-
Based Parenting Programs to Engage Fathers in Child Maltreatment 
Prevention (U01).
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Lisa T. Garbarino, B.S., 
NCIPC, Division of Injury Response, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., 
Mail-Stop F62, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, Telephone: (404) 723-
1527.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 20, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E9-7014 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Alpine Alpha 3, Ltd. (the
“Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)           The
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
March 31, 2009





/s/ James
Hahn





James
Hahn


Chief
Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) &


Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FERNANDO CAZARES, a/k/a

“SNEAKY”,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 06-50677

D.C. No. CR-04-00415-PA-04

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GILBERT SALDANA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 06-50678

D.C. No. CR-04-00415-PA-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

No. 06-50679

D.C. No. CR-04-00415-PA-01

FILED

MAY 06 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Senior District Judge for the U.S. **

District Court for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

 v.

ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

PORFIRIO AVILA, a/k/a Dreamer,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-50037

D.C. No. CR-04-00415-PA-05

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 11, 2012

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, Senior

District Judge.** 

A jury convicted defendants Alejandro Martinez, Gilbert Saldaña, Porfirio

Avila, and Fernando Cazares of violating 18 U.S.C. § 241 by conspiring to “injure,
oppress, threaten, or intimidate” African Americans in the Highland Park

neighborhood of Los Angeles. The jury also convicted Saldaña, Avila, and

Cazares of killing Kenneth Wilson in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 245(b). 

The evidence at trial included statements that Saldaña gave to the police. 

Neither party disputes that Saldaña was not told his Miranda rights before, during,

or after his interview on May 6, 1999. The disputed issue is whether he was in

custody when he made his statements. 

The district court denied Saldaña’s motion to suppress his statements, but it

made no factual findings regarding whether Saldaña was in custody. “When

factual issues are involved in deciding a motion, the court must state its essential

findings on the record.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(d). We reverse the denial of

Saldaña’s motion to suppress and “remand with instructions to the district court to

make essential factual findings explaining the basis for its decision.” United States

v. Wright, 625 F.3d 583, 604 (9th Cir. 2010).

The denial of Saldaña’s motion to suppress is REVERSED and

REMANDED to the district court for fact finding on whether Saldaña was in

custody when he made his statements to the police. We defer submission of the

rest of the appeal pending the district court’s fact finding.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Surg II, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian D. Niebur,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Brian D. Niebur

Brian D. Niebur
Chief Financial Officer
November 7, 2002
August 8, 2016

Mr. Alan Schmidt
Alan A. Schmidt 1150 N Loop 1604 W
Suite #108

- 283
San Antonio

, TX 78258

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 3878

Dear Mr. Schmidt :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst