alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13216-13217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Gestational Diabetes Life-Course 
Study.
    Date: April 20, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To provide concept review of proposed concept review.

[[Page 13217]]

    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bac9d1dbd4dedbc9dbfad7dbd3d694d4d3d294ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6859d979892978597b69b979f9ad8989f9ed8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 20, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-6786 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
exhibit1013.htm


     

    
      

      

    

    
      Exhibit
        10.13

       

      YA
        GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, L.P.

      101
        Hudson Street, Suite 3700

      Jersey
        City, New Jersey 07092

      


      


                                                                                     
        December 11, 2007

      


      SmarTire
        Systems Inc.

      
        	
                Richmond
                  Corporate Centre

              
	
                Suite
                  150-13151 Vanier Place

              
	
                Richmond,
                  British Columbia

              
	
                Canada
                  V6V 2J1

              
	
                Attention: 
                  Jeff Finkelstein, Chief Financial
                  Officer

              


      

      


      Dear
        Mr.
        Finkelstein:

      


      It
        has come to our attention that there
        is a typographical error regarding the interest rate in the convertible
        debenture number SMTR-6-2 (the “Debenture”) issued November 30, 2007, by
        SmarTire Systems Inc. (“SmarTire”) to Xentenial Holdings Limited.  As
        you know the term sheet for the transaction reflected an interest rate of
        twelve
        percent (12%), but the Debenture contains an interest rate of ten percent
        (10%).

      


      Your
        signature below represents SmarTire’s consent to amend the Debenture to reflect
        substitute a 12% interest rate for the rate currently set forth in the
        Debenture, effective as of the date of the Debenture.  As modified
        herein, the Debenture remains in full force and effect.

      


      


      


      
        	
                SMARTIRE
                  SYSTEMS INC.

              
	 
	
                By:       /s/Jeff
                  Finkelstein                                                         

              
	
                Name:  Jeff
                  Finkelstein

              
	
                Title:    Chief
                  Financial Officer

              


      

      


      


      cc:  Ethan
        Minsky, Esq.
CHARLESTON.

#### Frank Silverthorn *v.*City of Chester

(No. 6342)

Submitted January 22, 1929.

Decided January 29, 1929.

*614*Ingram & Levy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ramsay & Wilkin,*for defendant in error.

Litz, Judge:

The plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment of $3200.00 for personal injuries, against the defendant, a municipal corporation of Brooke county.

.On June 22,-1927, while walking home at night along the right side of Third Street in said municipality, the plaintiff stepped to the right over a steep declivity to avoid contact with an automobile approaching on the same side of the street from the opposite direction; thereby sustaining serious and permanent bodily injury. The street was laid with a concrete surface nine feet wide, but was not provided ’ with a sidewalk for pedestrians in the vicinity of the accident. Pedestrians were therefore accustomed to use the concrete surface stepping to the right or left side thereof, as the occasion might demand, to avoid vehicles. An embankment which formerly furnished a space to the right of the concrete surface in the direction the plaintiff was going for the protection of pedestrians from passing vehicles, had washed away several months before' the injury, leaving a sheer drop of seven feet from the edge of the concrete at the place of the accident.

The trial court held that the defendant was guilty of negligence as a matter of law in failing to restore the embankment to its original condition, and submitted to the jury only the issue of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The defendant insists that the question of its negligence also was one for jury determination.

As the facts are undisputed (no evidence having been offered by the defendant) and are such as would reasonably support only the conclusion of negligence by the defendant, the ruling of the circuit court must be affirmed. “Whether *615or not a county road (or street) is out of repair, depending not upon conflicting testimony, but upon clear established or admitted facts which are of such a Character that reasonable minds should not differ concerning their effect, is a question of law for the court to decide.” *Whittington*v. *County Court,*79 W. Va. 1; 29 C. J., 718; 13 R. C. L., 515; *Richmond*v *Lambert, 111*Va. 174, 68 S. E. 276, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 380. The duty of a city or town to keep its streets and sidewalks safe for foot passengers and vehicles is not met by keeping simply the béd of the highway or the surface of the sidewalk in proper condition; such duty is violated if a dangerous obstruction or excavation is permitted so close to the margin of the sidewalk or highway as to make the use of it dangerous. *Biggs*v. *Huntington,*32 W. Va. 55, 9 S. E. 51.

*Affirmed.*
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6502** 

REGINALD T. DAVIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cv - 04651

- JMC )

Submitted : August 18, 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Reginald T. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: Reginald T. Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge i ssues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- E l v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial o f a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Carl L. HAYES, Appellant.

WD 81607

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 30, 2019

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Appellant Carl Hayes ("Hayes") appeals his convictions of four counts of robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, and four counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015, following a jury trial in Jackson County Circuit Court. Hayes contends that *166the circuit court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence upon which the jury could have believed a deadly weapon was used during the commissions of the robberies. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Earl BULLETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5722 2D15-5741

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GARRETT LEE AVANT, )

DOC #S01284, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-204

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 27, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto 

County; Don T. Hall, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Linda Katz, Assistant 

Attorney General, Miami; Allison C. 

Heim, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa (substituted as counsel of 

record); and Ryan Sydejko, Assistant 

Attorney General for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11692 and #11693]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Pennsylvania dated 03/12/2009. *Incident:*
                         Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         01/24/2009. *Effective Date:*
                         03/12/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         5/11/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/12/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Chester. *Contiguous Counties:* Delaware: New Castle. Maryland: Cecil. Pennsylvania: Berks, Delaware, Lancaster, and Montgomery. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentHomeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.375Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.687Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
7.750Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11692 5 and for economic injury is 11693 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are: Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: March 12, 2009. Darryl K. Hairston, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. E9-5974 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 592 

Censuring Representative George Santos. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2023 

Mr. TORRES of New York (for himself, Mr. ROBERT GARCIA of California, Mr. 

GOLDMAN of New York, and Mr. LIEU) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics 

RESOLUTION 

Censuring Representative George Santos. 

Whereas Representative George Santos repeatedly lied to voters in his district, donors, and the American public during his campaign to be elected to Congress; 

Whereas a number of Republicans in Congress have called on 

George Santos to resign due to his hurtful lies and 

mistruths that have broken the trust of his constituents; 

Whereas George Santos lied about being a member of the 

Jewish faith during his Congressional campaign and deliberately misrepresented that his grandparents survived 

the Holocaust; 

Whereas George Santos falsely claimed that his mother died 

during the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 592 IH 

Whereas George Santos deliberately misrepresented his educational background by falsely claiming he received a 

bachelor’s degree from Baruch College and a master’s degree from New York University; 

Whereas George Santos falsely claimed he obtained a 

volleyball scholarship to his college; 

Whereas George Santos deliberately misrepresented his employment background, inaccurately claiming he worked at 

Goldman Sachs and Citigroup; 

Whereas George Santos falsely claimed that he founded an 

animal rescue charity that saved more than 2,500 dogs 

and cats; 

Whereas George Santos deliberately misrepresented that 4 of 

his employees were killed in the Pulse nightclub shooting; 

Whereas George Santos falsely claimed that he helped 

produce the Broadway musical ‘‘Spider-Man: Turn Off 

The Dark’’; 

Whereas George Santos deliberately misrepresented that he 

had a family-owned real estate portfolio of 13 properties; 

Whereas George Santos admitted to committing crimes in 

Brazil by using a fake name and stolen checkbook to purchase items; and 

Whereas George Santos failed to file his congressional financial disclosure reports as required by law: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) Representative George Santos be censured; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 592 IH 

1 (2) Representative George Santos forthwith 

2 present himself in the well of the House of Rep3 resentatives for the pronouncement of censure; and 

4 (3) Representative George Santos be censured 

5 with the public reading of this resolution by the 

6 Speaker. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, David J. Gallagher, Chief Financial Officer of QSound Labs, Inc., do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 of QSound Labs, Inc. and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations on QSound Labs, Inc.







/s/ David J. Gallagher





David J. Gallagher

Chief Financial Officer



March 21, 2005
William Lawrence CROSBY v. STATE

CR-16-0019

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

November 17, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, James G. Petcoff, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Pointe Holdings Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Intentionally omitted.     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: November 9, 2006                 /s/ James G. Petcoff   James G. Petcoff          Chief Executive Officer
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3



November 15, 2007



PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL



Mr. Brad Fackler, Executive VP, Commercial Operations

4520 East West Highway, 3rd Floor

Bethesda, Maryland 20814



     Re:     Amendment to Employment Agreement


Dear Mr. Fackler:



     This letter will reflect the agreement between you and Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) upon certain amendments to the terms of the Employment Agreement between you and the
Company dated June 16, 2006.



     Effective as of the first payroll period in June 2007, your Base Salary has been increased to
the annual rate of $231,000. In addition, effective immediately, your Compensation Upon Severance
in the event the Company terminates (or elects not to renew) your Employment Agreement “without
cause,” or upon disability pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Agreement, or in the event you terminate
the Agreement for “good reason” has been altered to increase your lump-sum severance to a payment
equal to six (6) months of your then-current base salary. Your Compensation Upon Severance has
also been altered to extend the period for which you are entitled to receive reimbursement for the
cost of continued health insurance coverage to a maximum of six (6) months after termination.



     Consistent with the requirements for modification set forth in Section 6.3 of the Employment
Agreement, this letter will document the mutual agreement between you and the Company to amend (1)
Section 3.1(a) of your Employment Agreement to reflect the foregoing increase in Base Salary, (2)
Section 4.4(a)(iii) of that agreement to reflect the foregoing increase in your Compensation Upon
Severance, and (3) Section 4.1(a) of that agreement to alter the definition of “Benefit Period” to
mean “six (6) month period” rather than “two (2) month period.”



     The foregoing are the only changes to the terms of the Employment Agreement to be made at this
time. Please indicate your agreement to these modifications of the Employment Agreement by
countersigning the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning the same
to me for the Company’s files.



     Thank you for your cooperation.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/  RYUJI UENO
 	 
	 	Ryuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D 	 
	 	President 	 
	 



Acknowledged and accepted this 7th day of December, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/  BRAD FACKLER 	 	 
	Brad Fackler