alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION




I, Barry
Hall, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2009, of SeaOspa Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)          Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision,to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)          Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)          Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)          All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)          Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Dated:  April
9, 2010




/s/ Barry HallBarry
      HallChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
  Officer)
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 18

- 00167

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 1093378

Style: Wayne Myers

v Pennymac Corp.

Date motion filed * : December 6, 2018

Type of motion: Motion for extension to file a motion for rehearing

Party filing motion:

Document to be filed: Motion for Rehearing

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: 11/7/18

Number of previous extensions granted: 1

Date Requested: Jan. 7 , 2019

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will n ot grant additional motions to extend time.

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s / Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

December 13, 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8521

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDDIE JEFFERSON, a/k/a Ice,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief

District Judge. (CR-92-314-A)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Eric Urofsky, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

Appellant's motion for evidentiary hearing on the evidence, merits

and testimony of defendant's substantial assistance. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Jefferson, No. CR-92-314-A (E.D.

Va. Nov. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
J.T., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-147

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT SEM EN AB R

AM IAN, AKA Se m e n Ara s e sovic h Abra

m y an a nd ELEONAR

A AB R AM IAN, AKA Ele onora

Abram y an, Pe titione rs, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-74033 Age n c y Nos. A070-947-920

A070-947-921 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2015 * * B e fore : SILVERM AN, B YB EE, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Se m e n Abra

m i an a nd Ele ona

ra Abram ia n, c i tiz e ns of Ge orgia , pe tition for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing the ir a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s orde r de ny ing the ir m otion to re ope n 

# FIL ED OCT 20 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).de porta

tion proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a b use of disc re tion thede nia l of a m otion to re ope n. Mohamme d v . Gonzale s , 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th C ir. 2005). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing pe titione rs’ m otion to re ope n a s untim e ly , whe re the y

file d the m otion fifte e n y e ars a fte r the i r fina l de porta tion orde r and a fte r Se pte m be r 30, 1996, se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.23(b)(1), a nd fa ile d to e sta

blish thedue dilige nc e re quire d for e q uita ble tolling of the filing de a dline , se e Iturribarria v . IN S, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th C ir. 2003) (e q uita ble tolling is a

va ila ble “ whe n a

pe titione r is pre ve nte d from filing be c a use of de c e ption, fra

ud, or e rror, a s long a s the pe titione r a c ts with due dilige nc e in disc ove ring the de c e ption, fra ud, or e rror” ). In light of this disposition, we do not a d dre ss pe titione rs’ re m a ining c onte ntions re g arding due proc e ss a nd c om plia nc e with the proc e dura l re quire m e nts se t forth in Matte r of Lozada , 19 I. & N. De c . 637 (B IA 1988). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 4 0 3 3 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12843-12844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2655-000]


Eagle & Phenix Hydro Company, Inc; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

March 18, 2009.
    On February 26, 2009, Eagle & Phenix Hydro Company, Inc., licensee 
for the Eagle and Phenix Hydroelectric Project, filed a Notice of 
Intent to file an Application for Surrender of License for the Project. 
The Eagle & Phenix Hydroelectric Project is located on the 
Chattahoochee River in Muscogee County, Georgia and Russell County, 
Alabama.
    The license for Project No. 2655 was issued for a period ending 
February 28, 2009. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2655 is issued to 
Eagle & Phenix Hydro Company, Inc for a period effective March 1, 2009 
through February 28,

[[Page 12844]]

2010, or until the issuance of a new license for the project or other 
disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new 
license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before 
February 28, 2010, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise. If the project is 
not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is hereby given that the 
Eagle & Phenix Hydro Company, Inc is authorized to continue operation 
of the Eagle & Phenix Hydroelectric Project, until such time as the 
Commission takes final action on any application for Surrender of 
License that may be filed.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-6497 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.51    
    


Summary of Compensation Arrangement between Agilent and the Non-Employee Directors 



        Effective
as of November 1, 2007, each of Paul N. Clark, Robert J. Herbold, Robert L. Joss, Koh Boon Hwee, Heidi Kunz, David M. Lawrence, M.D. and A. Barry Rand, the
non-employee directors of Agilent, receive annually (a) $75,000 in cash which is paid quarterly; (b) $75,000 in value of a stock option; and (c) $75,000 in value of
deferred shares of Agilent common stock. Any newly appointed director receives $130,000 in value of deferred shares of Agilent common stock, pursuant to the 1999 Non-Employee Director
Stock Plan. The stock options and the deferred shares vest quarterly over one year. 


        In
addition, non-employee directors who serve as the chairperson of a Board committee are entitled to a "committee chair premium." Specifically, the chairperson of the
Compensation Committee, provided that such person is not the Non-Executive Chairman, shall, on an annual basis, receive an additional ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) in cash. The
chairperson of the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board, provided that such person is not the Non-Executive Chairman, shall, on an annual basis, receive an additional twenty thousand
dollars ($20,000.00) in cash. The chairperson of any other Board committee, provided that such person is not the Non-Executive Chairman, shall, on an annual basis, receive an additional
five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) in cash. 


        Each
member of the Audit and Finance Committee shall, on an annual basis, receive an additional ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) in cash which shall be made in a lump sum payment as
soon as practicable following the Initial Payment Date with respect to the Plan Year. 



        The
Non-Executive Chairman, James G. Cullen, receives an Annual Retainer that consists of (i) an option to purchase shares of common stock in an amount equivalent to
$75,000, (ii) $260,000 in cash, and (iii) $75,000 in value of deferred shares of Agilent common stock. The Non-Executive Chairman is not eligible to receive any committee
chair premiums. The stock options and the deferred shares vest quarterly over one year. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.51
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the amended annual Report of Global Karaoke
Network, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2011 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jason Sakowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and



2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.



|By:    | /s/ Jason Sakowski                                                   
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Jason Sakowski                                                       
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
and Director
|Date:  | October 4,  2011                                                     



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
January 13, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RUBY YARBROUGH AND W ILBURN E. YARBROUGH , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 13

- 00932

- CV V.
HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION III , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Household Finance Corporation III, signed September 20, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected th e record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the

cause with instruction to dismiss the cause

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Househo ld Finance Corporation III.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     43206
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              38881
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                               192830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          282490
<PP&E>                                    333396
<DEPRECIATION>                            312272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            314895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     136057
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                 4472042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                               400000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              314895
<SALES>                                   363921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          363921
<CGS>                                     278746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             278746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (53906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (53906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (53906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHAIRMAN/CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., a Florida
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
      Charles A. Fust, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company and Scott M. Klein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Charles A. FustCharles
                A. FustChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay
                14, 2007/s/
                Scott M. KleinScott
                M. KleinChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                14, 2007







The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Form 10-QSB
      or
      as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement
      required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. and will be retained by SinoFresh
      HealthCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
James HINES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4472

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

COUNCIL CONCLUSIONS

on developing the agenda for the Community's external aviation policy

(2005/C 173/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Communication from the Commission on ‘Developing the agenda for the Community's external aviation policy’ (COM(2005) 79 final),

On matters of general policy

With regard to bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries

General principles regarding agreements/negotiations between the Community and third countries

Regarding existing mandates for comprehensive agreements/negotiations between the Community and third countries

Regarding the future development of policy on Community-level negotiations with third countries

----
Airworthiness 

Concern Sheet 

Date: 

Reason for Airworthiness Concern: 

 

Attachments: 

 Service Difficulty Report 

 Accident/Incident Data System 

 Service Letter / Bulletin 

 Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin 

 Federal Aviation Administration or 

 National Transportation Safety Board 

 Safety Recommendation 

 Airworthiness Directive 

 Alternate Means of Compliance 

 Risk Analysis 

Transmittal: 

 Federal Aviation Administration 

 Airplane Owners and Pilots Association 

 Experimental Aircraft Association 

 Type Club 

 Type Certificate Holder 

 Other: 

Response Requested By: 

 

 Emergency 

 (10 days) 

 Alert 

 (30 days) 

 Information 

 (90 days) 

This Airworthiness Concern Sheet (ACS) is intended as a means for FAA Aviation Safety Engineers to coordinate airworthiness concerns 

with aircraft owners/operators through associations and type clubs. At this time, the FAA has not made a determination on what type of 

corrective action (if any) should be taken. The resolution of this airworthiness concern could involve Airworthiness Directive (AD) 

action or a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB), or the FAA could determine that no action is needed at this time. The 

FAA’s final determination will depend in part on the information received in response to this ACS. 

The FAA endorses dissemination of this technical information to all manufacturers and requests association and type club comments. 

Make: 

Model / Series: 

Serial Numbers: 

Reply to: 

Name: 

Title: 

Office: 

Department: 

Street Address: 

City, State, ZIP: 

Telephone: 

Electronic Mail: 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Description of Airworthiness Concern 

 

Request for Information (For example: Proposed alternate inspection or repair procedures, cost impact, etc. Your comments or 

replies to the FAA need to be as specific as possible. Please provide specific examples to illustrate your comments or concerns.) 

 

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration
EXHIBIT 32.1








Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Steel Partners Holdings L.P.(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren G. Lichtenstein, Chief Executive Officer of Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc., the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




Date:April 4, 2013/s/ Warren G. LichtensteinWarren G. LichtensteinExecutive Chairmanof Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc.





*  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.