alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Petrobras Argentina
S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Carlos Alberto da Costa
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Carlos Alberto da Costa    
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Kyle GREEN, Appellant, v. Sarah GREEN, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Madison Management, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elaine M. Evans,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
      Elaine M. EvansElaine
      M. EvansPrincipal
      Financial OfficerMay
      5, 2009
Antoine WINSLETTE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11399-11400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5666]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fourth Plenary Meeting, NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task 
Force

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 12, 2009 starting at 9 a.m. to 12 
p.m. Arrive in FAA Lobby at 8:30 a.m. for visitor check in.

ADDRESSES: FAA Auditorium, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 850, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5

[[Page 11400]]

U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a NextGen Mid-Term 
Implementation Task Force meeting. The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions).
    <bullet> Work Group and Subgroup Status Reports and Planned 
Activities.
    <bullet> Discussion and Next Steps.
    <bullet> Closing Plenary (Other Business, Document Production, Date 
and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 10, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-5666 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
December 19, 2011

Mr. Charles Gaber Gulfstream Aerospace LP

P.O. Box 1036 Airport City, 70100

Israel

Dear Mr. Gaber:

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it.

We Have the Petition

W e’ve received your November 10, 2011, petition on behalf of Gulfstream Aerospace LP (GALP), for an exemption from § 21.213(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow GALPs limited partnership company the ability to obtain a Class II provision airworthiness certificate on its G280 that are not

manufactured in the United States.

We’ve added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2011-1271) and we are processing it. We will contact you if we need additional information.

How We’ll Process the Petition

A petition for an exem ption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. Although you requested that we not delay your petition by publishing it in the Federal Register , we find that the petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish the petition in the Federal Register so that the public may comment on it.2

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-4095.

Sincerely,

/s/

Frances Shaver Program Analyst Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
Exhibit 34.1 

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP 

One Towne Sq, Sre 600 

Southfield, MI 48076-3710 

Tel 248 372 7300 

Fax 248 368 8950 

Bakertilly.com 

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors of VW Credit, Inc. and 

CitiBank, N.A., Indenture Trustee: 

We haveexamined VW Credit, Inc’s (the Company) compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Company’s Volkswagen Auto Loan EnhancedTrust 2008-2 asset backed securitization transactions except for the servicing criteria set forth in Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(ii)-(iv), 229.1122(d)(2)(vi), 229.1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii), and 229.1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are notapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2011 and for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “ReportingPeriod”). Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, VW Credit, Inc. complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria for the reporting period ended December 31, 2011. 

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP 

/s/ BakerTilly Virchow Krause, LLP 

Southfield, Michigan 

March 27, 2012
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andrew Donald SHORES, Appellant

WD 81370

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: March 26, 2019

Garrick F D Aplin, for Respondent

Casey J. Symonds, Lee's Summit, for Appellant

James C. Egan, Co-counsel for Appellant

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge *634***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Shores appeals his convictions after bench trial in Bates County, Missouri for seven counts of statutory rape in the first degree and seven counts of endangering the welfare of a child. In his sole point on appeal, Shores claims the trial court erred in admitting evidence that he had raped another person. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 23.2

Bateman & Co., P.C.


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We  consent to the  inclusion  in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 1999,  which report will upon its filing be  incorporated  by
reference into GREKA Energy  Corporation's  registration  statements on Form S-3
(File Nos.  333-60621 and 333-78673) and form S-8 (File No.  333-30402),  of our
report  dated  April  14,  1998,  on our  audits of the  consolidated  financial
statements  of GREKA Energy  Corporation,  formerly  known as Petro Union,  Inc.
doing business as Horizontal Ventures Inc. the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                          /s/Bateman & Co., P.C.
                                                             -------------------
                                                             Bateman & Co., P.C.


  Houston, Texas
  May 1, 2000
J-A16001-16

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Cour t. NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

WILLIAM COATES, III,

Appellant :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 247 WDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence January 13, 20 15 in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-02-CR-0012614-2013

BEFORE: SHOGAN, OLSON, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.:

FILED: September 28, 2016

Because I conclude that the facts of this case do not result in Appellant

having waived his issues on appeal, I dissent. At sentencing, counsel for

Appellant moved to withdraw, and the trial court st ated that it would appoint

counsel, and entered an order to that effect two da ys later. That order was

not filed until five days after that, January 20, 2 015. 1 Thus, Appellant was

effectively not represented by counsel for at least 7 of the 10 days available

to him for filing timely a post-sentence motion. A ccordingly, I conclude that

this situation is sufficiently analogous to the sit uation in Commonwealth v.

1 Moreover, appointed counsel from the public defend er represents that her office did not receive notice of this appointment u ntil sometime in early February.J-A16001-16

- 2 -

Leatherby , 116 A.3d 73, 79 (Pa. Super. 2015); 2 and constitutes a

breakdown in the workings of the court. Thus, this Court is permitted to

consider the issues raised in Appellant’s late-file d post-sentence motion.

2 While certain aspects are distinguishable, the pri nciple in Leatehrby is applicable here. In that case, “the trial court di d not appoint new counsel for Leatherby in time to preserve his post-sentence rig hts,” and he “was effectively abandoned by counsel.” 116 A.3d at 79.
Order entered May 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00697-CR

ALLEN MAURICE LITTLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-0951721-Y

ORDER

The State’s motion to extend the time for filing a brief is GRANTED. The State’s brief, 

received on May 15, 2015, is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oreon Rental Corporation
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Alvaro Vollmers, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and results of
operations of the Company for the periods presented





Date: February
      16, 2010
              /s/ Alvaro
      VollmersAlvaro
      VollmersPresident,
      Secretary and
Treasurer
Robert C. KOSKI, Appellant, v. BEDSTONE HOLDINGS, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4051

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Charles Clarence CAMERON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4308

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

Removal from the register of Case C-384/03 (1)

(2005/C 182/59)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

By order of 28 April 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-384/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain.

----

(1)OJ C 264 of 01.11.2003.

----
James NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 106745

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: April 9, 2019

Amy E. Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Eric Schmitt, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*243***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

James Nichols appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>




                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Packaging Dynamics
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Phillip D. Harris, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Henry C. Newell, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


 /s/ PHILLIP D. HARRIS
------------------------------
Name: Phillip D. Harris
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 4, 2003

/s/ HENRY C. NEWELL
--------------------------------
Name: Henry C. Newell
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 4, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3839 — Access Industries/Basell)

(2005/C 172/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and ControlSpecial 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Potential Extramural Project (PEP) 2009-R-03

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-3 p.m., May 19, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of ``Establishing a Surveillance System 
for Chronic Kidney Disease, PEP 2009-R-03.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Linda Shelton, Public 
Health Analyst, Coordinating Center for Health and Information 
Service, Office of the Director, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E21, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 498-1194.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 16, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-6714 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Chauncy TAYLOR, Appellant.

ED 105796

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: June 18, 2019

Stephen P. Ranz, Kristina S. Olsen, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Eric Schmitt, Nathan J. Aquino, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

*179Chauncy Taylor appeals the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree statutory sodomy and first-degree child molestation. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0539 

FILED 

RAS JAHMIKES MATTA, NOV 0 2 2021 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee. 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of rviorttana 

OR[)ER 

Ras Jahmikes Matta moves this Court for appointment of counsel in his appeal. 

Matta provides that he was convicted of a crime. He states that he is indigent and that he 

cannot afford an attorney. Matta believes that he meets the eligibility requirements for the 

appointment of counsel. 

Matta appeals an October 14, 2021 Yellowstone County District Court's denial of 

his petition for postconviction relief. There is no right to the appointment of counsel in a 

postconviction proceeding for relief, although a court may order the assignment of counsel 

under the circumstances outlined in § 46-8-104, MCA. Matta represented himself in the 

District Court. Matta has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist to justify 

appointment of counsel, pursuant to § 46-8-104(3), MCA. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Matta's Motion for Court Appointed Counsel is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to Ras 

Jahrnikes Matta with a copy of this Court's Appellate Handbook. 

44 

DATED this day of November, 2021. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

11/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0539