alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-8591-6]


Absaloka Coal Mine Expansion, Notice of Availability of the 
Record of Decision (ROD), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 
System (NPDES) permit

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision to issue an 
NPDES permit for the South Extension of the Absaloka Coal Mine.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Absaloka surface coal mine is located in southeastern 
Montana, and will be expanding onto the Crow Indian Reservation. The 
NPDES permit will be for surface water discharges associated with the 
operation of the South Extension of the Absaloka Coal Mine. To support 
its NPDES decision, EPA has adopted the Environmental Impact Statement 
No. 20080406, BIA, MT, ``Absaloka Mine Crow Reservation South Extension 
Coal Lease Approval, Proposed Mine Development Plan, and Related 
Federal and State Permitting Actions, Crow Indian Reservation.'' The 
ROD and adopted FEIS are available for review at http://www.epa.gov/region8/water/npdes. The appeal period for the NPDES permit decision 
ends April 27, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Greg Davis; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#187c796e716b367f6a7d7f776a61587d6879367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ffbfee9f6ecb1f8edfaf8f0ede6dffaeffeb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>; 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, (8P-W-WW); 1595 Wynkoop 
St.; Denver, Colorado, 80202-1129; or 303-312-6314.

    Dated: March 24, 2009.
Susan E. Bromm,
Director, Office of Federal Activities.
 [FR Doc. E9-6889 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Terrance L. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2685

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-09-011]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: April 8, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1148 (Final)(Frontseating Service Valves from 
China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on or before April 20, 2009.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 23, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E9-6777 Filed 3-23-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
~htt£ of efu Werse1;l 

CHRIS CHRISTIE 

Governor 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

BOB MARTIN 

Commissioner 

KlM GUADAGNO 

Lt. Governor 

Judith Enck, Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region II 

290 Broadway 

New York, NY 10007-1866 

Re: Nomination for National Priorities List of Superfund Sites 

E.C. Electroplating site (Garfield Chromium Groundwater Contamination) 

City of Garfield,Bergen County 

Dear Ms. Enck: 

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) nominates the E.C. 

Electroplating site (Garfield Chromium Groundwater Contamination) located at 125 

Clark Street in the City of Garfield, Bergen County for inclusion on the National 

Priorities List (NPL) of Superfund sites. 

In September 2002, DEP issued a Notice of Violation to E.C. Electroplating for failing to 

comply with remedial investigation requirements and to initiate necessary cleanup 

actions. The company cited financial difficulty regarding continued cooperation to 

complete the required remedial actions. Therefore, in October 2002, DEP requested that 

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region II's Emergency and Remedial 

Response Division evaluate the site for removal action consideration. EPA Region II's 

Removal Action Branch has been assessing contaminated areas of the site and conducting 

interim remedial actions since that time. 

In September 20 I 0, acting on new EPA data about chromium contamination at the site, 

Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and 

administrator ofA TSDR, advised EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson in a formal letter to 

list the site on the NPL and provided a final health advisory for the site. Due to these new 

findings and the lack of a viable responsible party and scope of remedial work anticipated 

to investigate and clean up the chromium contamination to proteCt residents' health, it is 

appropriate that the site be proposed for the NPL. DEP recommends EPA Region II's 

Emergency and Remedial Response Division act on this request during Federal Fiscal 

Year 2011. 

New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer I Printed on Recycled Paper and Recyclable 
DEP appreciates the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process to 

nominate this site for NPL status and is looking forward to future cooperation with EPA 

during remedial work at the site. 

If you have any questions, please call me at 609-292-2885. 

Commissioner 

C' 	 George Pavlou, Deputy Administrator, EPA Region II 

Walter Mngdan, Director, EPA Emergency and Remedial Response Division 

Ircnc Kropp, Deputy Commissioner, DEI' 

Dave Sweeney, Assistant Commissioner, DEP Site Remediation Program
# Journal officiel C 163A/5 ju

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 163A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 48e année5 juillet 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 163A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

48e année5 juillet 2005

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informations |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 163A/1 | Publication d'un avis de vacance pour un poste de directeur de l'Agence européenne pour la sécurité et la santé au travail (grade A*14) COM/2005/10001 | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

III   Informations

Commission

2005/C 163A/1

Publication d'un avis de vacance pour un poste de directeur de l'Agence européenne pour la sécurité et la santé au travail (grade A*14) COM/2005/10001

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

III Informations

Commission

| 5.7.2005 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 163/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2005

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 163/1

---

Publication d'un avis de vacance pour un poste de

DIRECTEUR

de l'Agence européenne pour la sécurité et la santé au travail

(grade A*14)

COM/2005/10001

(2005/C 163 A/01)

L'Agence européenne pour la sécurité et la santé au travail a l'intention de nommer son directeur.

Les candidats doivent être ressortissants d'un des États membres de l'Union européenne.

Le directeur sera nommé par le conseil d'administration de l'Agence, sur la base d'une liste de candidats sélectionnés et proposés par la Commission européenne. Les rémunérations et les conditions d'emploi sont celles qui sont prévues pour les fonctionnaires des Communautés européennes de grade A*14. L'Agence et la Commission appliquent une politique d'égalité des chances.

La description du poste, l'acte de candidature et les instructions relatives à l'envoi de l'acte de candidature peuvent être téléchargés aux adresses suivantes:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_fr.htm

ou

http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/news/2005/jul/bilbao_vacancy_fr.html

La date limite d'envoi des candidatures est fixée au 10 août 2005 (le cachet de la poste faisant foi).

---
REPRESENTATI VE RANDOM POLYMER STRUCTURE:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Walter Reid Green,
Jr., as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green,
  Jr.Walter
      Reid Green, Jr.Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:  May 15,
      2009








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Darryl E. MORGAN, DC# 577694, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2219

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 18, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

HIRAM DEAN BIRD,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 21

- 30001

D.C. No. 4:14

- cr

- 00051

- BMM

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19, 2021 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Hiram Dean Bird appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking

supervised release and imposing a 6

- month custodial sentence and 33

- month term

of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Bird ’s c ounsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 30001

with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Bird the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has be en filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

However, w e remand the case to the district court with instructions to correct

the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence. At the

revocation hearing, the district court indicated that it was reimposing the special

conditions from the previous judgment. The special conditions in the instant

judgment differ fr om those contained in the previous judgment in two material

respects. Because the oral pronouncement of the sentence controls, we remand

solely for the district court to strike “ place of employment ” from Special Condition

7 and to strike Special Condition 13

. See United States v. Hernandez , 795 F.3d

1159, 1169 (9th Cir. 2015) (remanding for the district court to make the written

judgment consistent with the unambiguous oral p ronouncement of sentence).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw i s GRANTED.

AFFIRMED ; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                           6,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,175
<INVENTORY>                                     50,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,012
<PP&E>                                         174,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 750,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,613
<BONDS>                                        705,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           303
<OTHER-SE>                                   (124,537)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   750,703
<SALES>                                        209,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,259
<CGS>                                          121,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   663
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (747)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,765)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 14,455
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,220)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
----

Action brought on 26 May 2005 by the Italian Republic against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-211/05)

(2005/C 182/80)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 26 May 2005 by the Italian Republic, represented by Paolo Gentili, Avvocato dello Stato.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The action concerns Commission decision C (2005) 591 final which declared incompatible with the common market, as State aid contrary to Article 87 EC, two Italian tax measures granted to companies obtaining listing on regulated markets in the period stated in the measures themselves. Those measures reduce the rate of income tax for three years and exclude from taxable income the costs of the listing borne by the company.

According to the Commission, the measures in question are selective since they favour only those companies obtaining listing in the period stated in the Italian rules, excluding those already listed and those which might be listed in different periods; the measures cannot therefore be regarded as compatible since they do not come within any of the cases laid down in Article 87(2) and (3) EC.

The Italian Government criticises the decision, first, from the procedural point of view, since the Commission initiated the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC without discussing the measures with the Member State concerned beforehand.

Secondly, the applicant notes that the Commission did not submit any comments regarding a previous measure adopted by Italy in 1997, which was essentially the same.

Thirdly, the applicant denies that the measures are selective. In fact they are directed at a potentially indefinite number of recipients. On the other hand, the measures are consistent with the tax system as a whole, since they take account of the fact that, in order to be listed, a newly quoted company must bear very heavy charges which place it in a situation of reduced earning capacity compared both with unquoted companies and those which have been quoted for some time and have been able to write off those costs. The limited time period is the result of budgetary constraints and the experimental nature of the measure. That factor cannot, in itself, render selective a measure which is inherently not so.

Fourthly, the applicant denies that the Commission has demonstrated that the measure is likely to distort competition and affect trade between Member States.

Fifthly and finally, the applicant argues that if the measure is defined as aid, it is compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c). It is aid for investments rather than for operations, and is consistent with the specific economic objective of promoting the listing of companies on the stock exchange which is beneficial for efficiency, transparency and the competitiveness of the system.

----
***Exhibit
        32***
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of US Energy Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30th, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Claude
        Eldridge, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
        November 17th, 2006
 
 By: /s/
        Claude Eldridge
 Claude
        Eldridge , Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 61787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4339-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4339-DR), dated September 20, 
2017, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued December 6, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective November 15, 2017.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-28192 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
CORNERSTONE INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant, v. ADVANCE AC, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1139

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 7, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
BERT SMITH EURO COLLECTION, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION O/B/O Dyer O. KASAKOFF, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0170

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Rolando RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1625

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 27, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.