alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 3, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2017, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 73 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-96, CP2018-138.                

Elizabeth A. Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2017-28358 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the report on Form 10-K of Aurum, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Peter James Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)           The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  January 26, 2011














/s/ Peter Lee


Peter Lee


Secretary and


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Accounting Officer)











1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHAIRMAN AND CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Charles A. Fust, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     May 13, 2005             Charles A. Fust    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
18
#### ROUBAY v. WARDEN, United States Penitentiary McNeil Island.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 17, 1942.

Paul B. Roubay, in pro. per., for appellant.

No other appearances were entered.

Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner seeks from this court a writ of habeas corpus addressed to the Warden, United States Penitentiary McNeil Island, Washington. The circuit court of appeals has no power to issue writs other than in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. Jud.Code, § 262, 28 U.S.C.A. § 377. In no way can the writ sought by petitioner aid that jurisdiction.

Petition denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136321 & (82)(85)(86) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Justices Cross-Appellee, 

v SC: 136321 

 COA: 269999 
 Wayne CC: 05-003753

ANTHONY LEE BAISDEN,

Defendant-Appellee/ 

Cross-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The motion for bond pending appeal is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal and 

the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant remain pending. 

p0729 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 1, 2008 

 Clerk
Management Bonus Program Summary



 Exhibit 10.26 
 TransMedics, Inc. 
 Summary of 2007 Management Bonus Program 
 The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of TransMedics, Inc. (the “Company”) may approve the payment of discretionary bonuses to
the Company’s executive officers for performance during fiscal 2007. Each executive officer has a target annual performance bonus for fiscal 2007 equal to a percentage of his or her base salary. The amount of the actual bonus to be paid, which
may be from zero to 100% of the target amount, depends on (1) the achievement of corporate milestones established by the Board of Directors and (2) the individual’s contribution to the achievement of functional area milestones. An
executive will receive up to 70% of his or her target bonus amount based on the achievement of the corporate milestones and up to 30% of his or her target bonus amount based on his or her contribution toward the achievement of functional area
milestones. 
 The corporate milestones relate to achieving initial commercial success in Europe and other areas outside the United States as
evidenced by revenue from sales of the Organ Care System (50%), obtaining conditional approval from the FDA of the Company’s IDE to commence the pivotal phase of its PROCEED trial (25%) and development of a prototype of the Organ Care
System for use in human lung transplantation studies (25%). The functional area milestones relate to the following functional units within the Company: European operations, clinical development/affairs, finance, marketing, operations, engineering,
and regulatory and reimbursement. The Compensation Committee will determine the amount of each executive officer’s bonus based on an evaluation of the Company’s performance and such executive officer’s contribution. 
 The target bonus amount for each of the Company’s named executive officers (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K) who were serving as
executive officers of the Company as of October 2007, as well as executive officers of the Company who are expected to be named executive officers for fiscal 2008, is set forth in the table below. 
  

							
	 	  	Fiscal 2007 Target Bonus	 
	 	  	% of Base
Salary	 	Amount	 
	 Waleed H. Hassanein, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	41%	 	$	131,200	 
	 James V. Rao
Chief Financial Officer
	  	33%	 	$	79,200	 
	 Tamer I. Khayal, M.D.
Vice President Clinical Development
	  	28%	 	$	65,800	 
	 Christoph Elser
Vice President Europe
	  	25%	 	€	50,000	*
	 Thomas H. Bishop
Vice President Engineering
	  	25%	 	$	52,500	 
	 John P. Mazzola
Vice President Operations
	  	20%	 	$	45,000	 



	*	Calculated in Euros, which is the currency in which Mr. Elser is paid his base salary.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Environmental Energy Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Greg Holsted  Greg Holsted, Chief Financial Officer  Date:  May 29, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 61 (Wednesday, April 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14823-14824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[IA-08-023; ASLBP No. 09-882-02-EA-BD01]


In the Matter of Himat Soni; Establishment of Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.202, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 
2.311, 2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety 
and Licensing Board is being established to preside over the following 
proceeding:

In the Matter of Himat Soni; (Enforcement Action)

    This proceeding concerns a request for a hearing submitted on March 
13, 2009 by the law firm of Akerman Senterfitt on behalf of Mr. Himat 
Soni in response to a February 10, 2009 ``NRC Staff Order Prohibiting 
Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities,'' 74 FR 7932 (Feb. 20, 2009). 
Under the terms of that Order, the Staff concluded that Mr. Himat Soni, 
the President and Radiation Safety Officer of Eastern Testing and 
Inspection, Inc. (ETI), violated 10 CFR 30.10, which states, in part, 
that any Licensee or employee of a Licensee may not engage in 
deliberate misconduct that causes a Licensee to be in violation of any 
rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission. The Order 
therefore prohibits Mr. Himat Soni from any involvement in NRC-licensed 
activities for a period of one year from the effective date of the 
Order.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Ann Marshall Young, Chair, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Paul B. Abramson, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001.
Bruce R. Matthews, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001.

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in

[[Page 14824]]

accordance with the NRC E-filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in 
August 2007. See 72 FR 49139 (Aug. 28, 2007).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of March 2009.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-7284 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0196 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. DUSTIN LEE LEGARE,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 21 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 12 2020

08/12/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0196
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-28-2000
<CASH>                                          38,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,578
<INVENTORY>                                     47,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,413
<PP&E>                                         203,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 803,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189,136
<BONDS>                                        691,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           315
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   803,180
<SALES>                                        520,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               520,694
<CGS>                                          286,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  286,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,222
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,734
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,125
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,125
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16





</TABLE>
In connection with the First Amendment to Quarterly Report of Daleco Resources
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005
(the "Report") dated December 15, 2005, I, Stephan V. Benediktson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Stephan V. Benediktson
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Stephan V. Benediktson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        December 16 , 2005
----

Removal from the register of Case C-54/04 (1)

(2005/C 182/62)

(Language of the case: German)

By order of 4 April 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-54/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria.

----

(1)OJ C 71 of 20.03.2004.

----
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 235 

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2023, as ‘‘National 

Agriculture Day’’ and celebrating the importance of agriculture as one 

of the most impactful industries in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2023 

Mr. ALFORD (for himself, Mr. COSTA, Ms. BUDZINSKI, Mr. MANN, Mr. 

FINSTAD, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER, Mr. VAN ORDEN, 

Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. FEENSTRA, Ms. CRAIG, 

Mr. BOST, Mr. DUARTE, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. 

WESTERMAN, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mrs. CAMMACK, Mr. LAMALFA, 

Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, Ms. DAVIDS of 

Kansas, Mr. SORENSEN, Ms. CARAVEO, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. NUNN of 

Iowa, Mr. BACON, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Ms. TOKUDA, Ms. PEREZ, and Mr. JACKSON of Illinois) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2023, 

as ‘‘National Agriculture Day’’ and celebrating the importance of agriculture as one of the most impactful 

industries in the United States. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses support for the designation of 

3 ‘‘National Agriculture Day’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 235 IH 

1 (2) celebrates the importance of agriculture as 

2 one of the most impactful industries in the United 

3 States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 14835-001]

                    Take notice that Merchant Hydro Developers, LLC, permittee for the proposed Susan Russ Memorial Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Project, has requested that its preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was issued on June 6, 2017, and would have expired on May 31, 2020.[1]                                          The project would have been located near the town of Manhattan in Tioga County, Pennsylvania.                

                    The preliminary permit for Project No. 14835 will remain in effect until the close of business, January 26, 2018. But, if the Commission is closed on this day, then the permit remains in effect until the close of business on the next day in which the Commission is open.[2]                                          New applications for this site may not be submitted until after the permit surrender is effective.                

Dated: December 27, 2017.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             159 FERC 62,245 (2017).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2017).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2017-28346 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 11, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 95

- 01209

- CV

CONNIE A. FLETCHER AND FRANK J. BREWER , Appellants V. DEBORAH C. BRETT, NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS THE GUARDIAN

OF JAMES E. BREWER , Appellee
On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 95

- 622

- P2(A)

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III We reinstate this appeal. In 1996 , we abated this case due to Connie A.

Fletcher’s bankruptcy. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 8.2. The Court conducted an independent
review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system

which shows the bankr uptcy case associated with this appeal was terminated on May
28, 2004 , effectively dissolving the automatic stay.
We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status
of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would– 2

–

result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id . 42.3(b),(c). To
date, neither party has responded.
Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecut ion and no one responded, we dismiss this
appeal. See id . 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co ., 2002 WL 31312990, at *1
(Tex. App.

— Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for
publication).

951209f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III/ / BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CONNIE A. FLETCHER AND FRANK J. BREWER, Appellants

No. 05

- 95

- 01209

- CV V.
DEBORAH C. BRETT, NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS THE GUARDIAN OF JAMES E. BREWER, Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 95

- 622

- P2(A). Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III. Justices Osborne and Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 11 th day of June , 2021

.