alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amend. No. 2 to Amend. and Restated Declaration of Trust of  the Co-Registrant



 Exhibit 4.2.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

 DECLARATION OF TRUST AND TRUST AGREEMENT 
 OF 
 DB G10 CURRENCY HARVEST MASTER FUND 
 This Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment No. 2”) to the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement
dated as of September 12, 2006 (the “Declaration of Trust”) of DB G10 Currency Harvest Master Fund (the “Master Fund”) by and among DB Commodity Services LLC (the “Managing Owner”), Wilmington
Trust Company and PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund. 
 WHEREAS, the Managing Owner has obtained the written
approval of PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund (the “Limited Owner”) to amend the Declaration of Trust to memorialize changes to certain fee provisions disclosed in the Declaration of Trust; and 
 WHEREAS, the Managing Owner wishes to amend the Declaration of Trust pursuant to Section 11.1(a) thereof to give effect to the
foregoing. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of all of which are hereby acknowledged, the Declaration of Trust is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Effective as of January 4, 2010, Section 4.9 shall be amended and replaced in its entirety as follows: 

 “SECTION 4.9. Compensation to the Managing Owner. The Managing Owner shall be entitled to compensation for its
services as managing owner of the Trust as set forth in the Prospectus.” 
  

	 	2.	This Amendment No. 2 to the Declaration of Trust shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware.


 Remainder of page left blank intentionally. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 has been executed
for and on behalf of the undersigned effective as of the 4th day of January, 2010. 
  

					
	 DB COMMODITY SERVICES LLC,
 as Managing Owner

		
	By:	 	/s/ Martin Kremenstein
		 	Name: 	 	Martin Kremenstein
		 	Title:	 	 Director and
 Chief
Operating Officer

		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael Gilligan
		 	Name: 	 	Michael Gilligan
		 	Title:	 	Principal Financial Officer


 Acknowledged:

 WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its 
 individual capacity but solely as Trustee 
 of the Master Fund 
  

					
		
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph B. Feil
		 	Name:	 	Joseph B. Feil
		 	Title:	 	Vice President
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of SeaOspa, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my best knowledge and belief:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:  April
16, 2010





/s/ Barry HallBarry
      HallChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
  Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 19, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, May 19, 2009, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

March 17, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-6366 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Jason LE BLANC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1239

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
In the MATTER OF the Care and Treatment of Roy VEACH a/k/a Roy L. Veach, a/k/a Roy Lane Veach, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80825

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: June 25, 2019

Amy E. Lowe, for Appellant

Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, for Respondent

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Roy Veach appeals from the circuit court's judgment committing him to the Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator. Veach argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his commitment trial because counsel failed to (1) investigate her theory of defense and (2) object to the testimony of a psychologist about the results of two tests. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
\ 

### /

SERVED: December 17,2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTEROF NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0620
AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER Ourprevious Procedural Order is amended as follows. WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. Unless otherwise amended the original Procedural Order remains ineffect. 2. On orbefore March 7, 2014, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limitedto, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersignedfor resolution in a timely manner; 3. The parties shall be preparedto present this case at a hearing onorafter March 7, 2014 1, subject to the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 1. All documents are to be submittedto the undersigned as follows: HON. Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation

1 14 C.P.R.§ 13.221 states: "The administrative lawjudge shall give each party at least 60 days notice of the date, time and location ofthe hearing." 1(
1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Attn: Patricia Matthews Administrative matters should be directed to PatriciaMatthews, StaffAssistant (202) 366-5121 at (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov). The Judge's email is (Richard.Goodwin@dot.govi. All other matters should be addressed in writing/email to Judge Goodwin.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

2 Mr. Leibowitz retired September 30, 2013. 2(

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel GreatLakes Region Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East DevonAvenue, AGL-7 Des Plaines, IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAX: 847-294-7498 ONE COPY

Martin A. Blumenthal,Respondent's Counsel Attorney One Northfield Plaza, Suite 300 Northfield, IL 60093 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0620 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 3
Paddy Field Lease Contract





The Leaser (hereinafter referred to as party A): Heilongjiang Chahar Farm


The Leasee (hereinafter referred to as party B): Qiqihar Fuer Agronomy Inc.


Signed at: Chahaer Farm





1: The ownership and area of paddy field hereunder: Party A holds use certificate for the field to be leased herein. The estimated area of the paddy field is 10500Mus (7 square kilometers). The actual area of the paddy field shall be subject to actual measurement by both parties.





2: Lease Term: The lease term shall be 12 years, starting on January 1, 2011 and ending on December 31, 2022.





3: Price and Amount:The lease price of the paddy field herein shall be 0.35 Yuan per square meter per year, totaling 29.4 million Yuan for 12 years.





4: Payment:Party B have paid to Party A the total amount of 29.4 million Yuan before December 30, 2010. If there is some difference of actual area measured by the two parties, the excess payment shall be refunded and deficiency shall be repaid.





5: Party A’s obligation: After Party B receive use certificate for the paddy field, Party A shall make sure that the field will not be leased to another party, there is no disputes over the field.





6: Liabilities for breach of contract: If Party A breaches the Contract, Party A shall return all of the lease fees paid by party B and make a one-time compensation to Party B based on Party B’s actual loss. If Party B breaches the Contract, Party B shall make a one –time compensation to Party A based on Party A’s actual loss.





7: Disputes settlement:All disputes arising from the performance of this contract should be settled through negotiations. Should no settlement be reached through negotiations, both parties may bring an action in the People’s Court at the place where Party B resides.





This Contract is executed in two counterparts, each party holding one counterpart with same effects.





This Contract shall come into effect upon sighed by both parties.








Representative of Party A: Li Dapeng


Representative of Party B: Zhang Li


December 15, 2010
Exhibit 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











In connection with this Annual Report of Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andreas Michalopoulos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date:  March 19, 2012







/s/ Christina AnagnostaraChristina AnagnostaraChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 4.8
 DeGolyer and MacNaughton




---



##### 



Methodology and Procedures
      2




---



##### 



Definition of Reserves
  Proved oil and gas reserves
     3




---



##### 



Developed oil and gas reserves
    4




---



##### 



Undeveloped reserves 
  
 Primary Economic Assumptions
  Oil and Condensate Prices
   5




---



##### 



Natural Gas Prices
  Operating Expenses and Capital Costs
    Net Proved Reservesas ofDecember 31, 2009NaturalOil and NGL
    
    
    Gas
    
    
    Oil Equivalent(MMbbl)
    
    
    (MMcf)
    
    
    (MMboe)South AmericaProved Developed
    
    
    52,765
    
    
    
    420,110
    
    
    
    122,783Proved Undeveloped
    
    
    11,672
    
    
    
    412,488
    
    
    
    80,420Total Proved
    
    
    64,437
    
    
    
    832,598
    
    
    
    203,203
 Notes:1.
    
    Gas is converted to oil equivalent using a factor of 6,000 cubic feet of gas per
1 barrel of oil equivalent.  6




---



##### 



Extractive Industries  Oil and Gas (Topic 932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation
and Disclosures
   7




---



##### 



Thomas C. Pence, P.E.Vice President
DeGolyer and MacNaughton  8




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATION
  1.
    
    That I am a Vice President with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, which company did prepare
the report addressed to PESA dated January 15, 2010 and that I, as Vice President, was
responsible for the preparation of this letter.
 2.
    
    That I attended Texas A&M University, and that I graduated with a degree in Petroleum
Engineering in the year 1982; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of
Texas; that I am a member of the International Society of Petroleum Engineers; and that I
have in excess of 28 years of experience in the oil and gas reservoir studies and reserves
evaluations.
  Thomas C. Pence, P.E.Vice President
DeGolyer and MacNaughton  9
Dennis McGlynn 

659 Dorothy Way 

Auburn, CA 95603 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn. Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

800 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Wilber Wright Building, Suite 2W 1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk 

July 101

h 2013 

My name is Dennis McGlynn. My case number is 2012WP270033. I am requesting a 

hearing in this matter of proposed civil penalty. 

::-h! .· · .. /m'·· · ~ JdJ.r--.--~~ jV .JC.y--.-/ I I 

Dennis McGlynn 

RECEIVED 

JUL 1 5 2013 

HEARING DOCKET 
Dennis McGlynn 

659 Dorothy Way 

Auburn, CA 95603 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn. Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

800 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Wilber Wright Building, Suite 2W 1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk 

July lOth 2013 

My name is Dennis McGlynn. My case number is 2012WP270033. I am requesting a 

hearing in this matter of proposed civil penalty. 

RECEIVED 

JUL 1 5 2013 

HEARING DOCKET
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Cory James SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. SD 35378

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

Filed: August 1, 2019

Attorney for Appellant: Carol D. Jansen of Columbia, MO.

Attorney for Respondent: Eric S. Schmitt, Atty. Gen., and Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Jefferson City, MO.

JEFFREY W. BATES, C.J.

*907Cory Smith (Defendant) appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of the class B felony of child molestation in the first degree. *See* § 566.067.1 The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior offender to serve ten years in prison on each count. The court orally pronounced that the ten-year sentences were "to run *concurrently* with each other and with the sentence imposed that he's currently being incarcerated for." (Emphasis added.) The written judgment, however, incorrectly stated that the ten-year terms were to run *consecutively.* In Defendant's single point, he contends his case should be remanded with directions for the trial court to correct the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. We agree.

The State concedes this case should be remanded. At the sentencing hearing, the State recommended "ten- to twelve-year sentences on each [count], to run concurrent." The trial court followed the State's recommendation during the oral pronouncement of Defendant's sentences, and the court's pronouncement is unambiguous. *See****Johnson v. State*** , 446 S.W.3d 274, 276 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014) ("formal oral pronouncement controls if it is unambiguous"). The failure of the written judgment to accurately record Defendant's sentences as running concurrently was a clerical error correctable via *nunc pro tunc* order. ***Id*** . at 277 ; *see****State v. Liker*** , 537 S.W.3d 405, 413 (Mo. App. S.D. 2018) ; ***State v. Woods*** , 357 S.W.3d 249, 256 (Mo. App. W.D. 2012) ; *see also* Rule 29.12(c) (permitting a trial court to correct such clerical errors in the judgment that obviously are a result of oversight or omission). "Remand is appropriate." ***Liker*** , 537 S.W.3d at 413 ; ***State v. Sanders*** , 481 S.W.3d 907, 912 (Mo. App. .E.D. 2016). Defendant's point is granted.

We, therefore, remand to the trial court for the sole purpose of entering a *nunc pro tunc* order to correct the written judgment to reflect that Defendant's sentences are to run concurrently with each other and with the other sentence Defendant was serving at the time of sentencing.

DANIEL E. SCOTT, P.J. - CONCUR

MARY W. SHEFFIELD, J. - CONCUR

1

All statutory references are to RSMo Cum. Supp. (2013). All rule references are to Missouri Court Rules (2019).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 1997 and the consolidated statement of
income for the six months ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,302
<SECURITIES>                                    49,120
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                        62
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,637
<PP&E>                                         110,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,799
<BONDS>                                         79,705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        148
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,229
<SALES>                                          6,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,657
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    18
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                       841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,309
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5645 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5645

 To direct the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
convey an easement to St. Louis County, Missouri, for the construction, 
        operation, and maintenance of a road in Lemay, Missouri.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2006

 Mr. Carnahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
convey an easement to St. Louis County, Missouri, for the construction, 
        operation, and maintenance of a road in Lemay, Missouri.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENT.

    (a) Conveyance.--Not later than September 1, 2006, the Director of 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall convey to St. Louis 
County, Missouri, without consideration, an irrevocable and perpetual 
easement over the property described in subsection (b) for use in the 
construction, operation, and maintenance of a road in Lemay, Missouri.
    (b) Property Description.--The easement to be conveyed under 
subsection (a) shall apply with respect to approximately 0.45 acres and 
520 linear feet and is the route identified as the ``FEMA'' route in 
the document entitled ``Lemay Connector Road for Long-Term Recovery, 
Recreational Enhancements, & Community, & Economic Development'', dated 
June 1, 2006, on file with the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```