**FORM A -1** 

**PA RENT COMPA**  **NY INFORMA TION** 
**I. Parent Company / Legal Corporate Owner Information**
1. Legal Parent Company/ Legal Corporate Name Johns Manville 2. Address 717 17th Street 3. City Denver 4. State Colorado 5. Zip Code 80202 6. County Denver
7. Size of Company (approximate number of employ ees including all subsidiaries, branches, and related establishments owned): 6,491 (end of 2009)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM A -2** 

**FA CILITY INFORMA** 

**TION**
**II. Facility Information**
Facility Name Johns Manville Richmond Plant Facility Address Street 814 Richmond Ave. City Richmond State Indiana Zip Code 47374 County Wa yn e Facility Coordinates Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 39.834342 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.91624 Specific location represented (e.g., front door of main building, centroid of property , etc.) Office Door-Main Building
Number of employees attached to the wool fiberglass manufacturing facility : See CBI Subm ittal
Design capacity

of the plant (tons/y r) See CBI Subm ittal
Ty pe(s) of process(es) (rotary spin, flame attenuation) at this plant Rotary Spin
Operation schedule hrs/day 24 days/y r 365
Identify what state and local air pollution rules and regulations, including permit requirements, your plant is subject to. (Please provide copies of permit(s) and permit IDs) Indiana Department of Environmental Management Part 70 Air Operating Permit. (177-22598-00006) See attachment A

**III. Technical Contact**

Name Dan Stevens Technical Contact Title HSE Manager Telephone 765-973-5243 Facsimile (Fax) 765-973-5371 Email 

### Dan.Stevens@jm.com

EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**IV. Other**

Is the facility

a major source of HAP? No
If No, did the facility take a limit of its potential HAP emissions to avoid classification as a major source: No, true minor
Does the facility

manufacture other products in addition to wool fiberglass? No
If Yes, list the other products manufactured at the facility

. NA
Are there any

HAP em issions associated with any co-located facilities? List unit operations, e.g., boiler, and pollutant/emissions. No



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarilyshutdown. (Do not include lines permanentlyshutdown). 2
For each process line: Process Line 1 Process Line 2 Process Line 3

Process line identification names or numbers Process Line 2- 7602 Process Line 3 - 7603
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotaryspin, flame attenuation) Rotary Spin Rotary Spin Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) See CBI Submittal See CBI Submittal

Age of process equipment (y rs) Installed in 1961, modified in 2000 & 2006 Installed in 1961, modified in 2000 & 2006
Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product See CBI Submittal See CBI Submittal
Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. See Attachment B See Attachment B



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM B-2**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**II. Process - Raw materials Handling and Storage**
Molten glass preparation Raw m aterials and proportions by wt (%) 

### % by Wt

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

Method(s) of convey ing each raw material to furnace/pots Gravity feed to weigh/mix hopper, bucket elevator to conveyor belt. From conveyor belt into day bin to furnace Binder and Additives List each raw material, including premixed materials, in the binder formulation and its proportion by wt (%) NA List steps in preparing binder, including storage temperature ( ° F) and holding tim e (hrs) No binder used Total yearly

consumption of binder (gal/y r) 0 Cost of binder ($/gal) for most recent year (specify year) NA
Are binder storage and mixing tanks vented to outside/inside? NA



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsMethod of treating vent air from storage and mix tanks NA

Emission control during liquid raw material transfer from vehicles to storage tanks. NA Describe future source reduction plans and schedules to reformulate binders; List each constituent, proportions wt (%), cost ($/gal) for reformulation NA



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM B-3**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**III. Process - Glass Melting Furnace**
For each Glass Melting Furnace: Furnace 1 Furnace 2 Furnace 3 Process unit identification name/number Electric Melter Process line(s) served (identification name/number) 7602 and 7603 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 39.835002 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.945713 Stack or vent height (units) 50.8 feet Stack or vent diameter (units) 2 feet Manufacturer and model Sorg Date of original installation 2006

Estimate of remaining lifetime (y rs) Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance) Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. Frequency

of a major rebuild N/A Cost of ty pical major rebuild N/A Date of last major rebuild N/A Purpose of last major rebuild N/A Increase or decrease in emissions N/A Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil Electric Fuel consumption rate (KW /ton of glass or Btu/ton of glass) See CBI Subm ittal
List HAPs that are in refractory material Chromium Compounds Design production rate (tons/day ) See CBI Subm ittal Actual glass pull rate (tons/day ) See CBI Subm ittal Vent gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 8476 Temperature ( ° F) of molten glass in furnace and forehearth (if applicable) See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures See CBI Subm ittal

Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Installation of electric
me lter (replaced natural gas melters)
Describe future source reduction plans and schedules No current plans



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 
For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Forming Operation 1 Forming Operation 2 Forming Operation 3

Process unit identification name/number Line 2 Forming and Collection Module Line 3 Forming and Collection Module Process line(s) served (identification name/number) 7602 7603 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 39.835025 39.834934 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.915447 -84.915456 Stack or vent height (units) 196.8 feet 180.8 feet Stack or vent diameter (units) 9 feet 8 feet Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Air Air Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Yes Yes Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the

term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. Frequency

of a major rebuild N/A N/A Cost of ty pical major rebuild N/A N/A Date of last major rebuild N/A N/A Purpose of last major rebuild N/A N/A Increase or decrease in emissions N/A N/A If modular, number of modules and plenums Not modular Not modular Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Binder applied and application rate (gpm) None None Other material applied and application rate (gpm) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) No binder No binder Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) No binder No binder Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Formed mat thickness (in.) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F) 131000 112000 Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted 100% exhausted 100% exhausted Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsDescribe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce

em issions None None Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM B-5**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**V. Process - Curing No curing ovens** 

For each Curing Oven: Curing Oven 1 Curing Oven 2 Curing Oven 3 Process unit identification name/number
Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Method of curing Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Major rebuilds: W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil Fuel consumption rate (KW /hr or BTU/hr) Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat: inlet outlet Air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) from curing Exhaust air temperature ( ° F) Residence time of product (mins) Binder content of cured product (LOI) Nature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM B-6**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**VI. Process - Cooling** 

### No Cooling

For each Cooling Operation: Cooling Operation 1 Cooling Operation 2 Cooling Operation 3 Process unit identification name/number
Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Cooling air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) Percentage of cooling air recirculated (if any ) Cooling air temperature (°F) Nature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions
Describe future source reduction plans and schedules



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM B-7**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**VII. Process - Use of Solvents**

Use of Solvents

Volatile solvents used at y our facility (where and how used) By agreement this question was limited to HAP containing solvents. W e interpret this question to applyto wool fiberglass lines, from melting through collection. None List each solvent used and quantity(gal/y r) NA Emission control device(s) used to control emissions from solvent usage/storage? NA



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM B-8**

**PROCESS OPERA TIONS** 

VIII. Pollution Prevention

Please describe any

work practices, pollution prevention techniques, and control strategies evaluated and/or implemented at each process unit at your facility

(e.g., binder reformulation, alternative fuels usage, etc.) to reduce emissions of PM and HAPs y ou identified in Form E. You m ust specify

the year in which the facility im plem ented the practice/technique and identifythe emission reductions (if measured) from these practices/techniques. JM objects to this question in that it is unbounded in time. We interpret this question, like similar questions in the ICR, to seek data since 1999. W ith that interpretation, JM responds as follows: optimize process water flow rate in forming and collection chambers on both process lines.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-1**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 
**I. Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)** No ESP

For each ESP: ESP 1 ESP 2 ESP 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Number of collection plates and configuration Gas flow rate to ESP (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Pressure drop across ESP (in. H 2 O gauge) Plate area (ft 2 ) Vendor guarantee on ESP efficency (attach copy ) Method of plate cleaning and frequency Flow rate of plate washwater to ESP (gpm), if applicable Temperature of plate washwater to ESP ( ° F), if applicable Source of plate washwater used for cleaning, if applicable Concentration (mg/l) of dissolved and suspended solids in plate washwater, if applicable Conditioning agents used and amounts (in gpm or lbs/hr), if applicable Amount of wastewater generated (gpd), if applicable Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd), if applicable Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd), if applicable Method of wastewater disposal, if applicalbe Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantitiy

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsMethod of solid waste disposal

Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor ESP performance, including parameters monitored Describe any

plans to replace or upgrade ESP



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-2**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**II. Scrubber** 

### Water spray used (not a scrubber)

For each Scrubber: Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 Scrubber 3
Process line(s) (identification name/number) Line 2 Forming and Collection Module Line 3 Forming and Collection Module Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) 7602 7603 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 39.835025 39.834934 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.915447 -84.915456 Stack or vent height (units) 196.8 feet 180.8 feet Stack or vent diameter (units) 9 feet 8 feet Manufacturer and model JM Proprietary JM Proprietary Date of original installation Unknown Unknown Ty pe (e.g., venturi, orifice) Wa ter spray Wa ter spray Gas flow rate to scrubber (acfm @ ° F) 131000 112000 Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 200 200 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 110 162 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Unknown Unknown Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0292 0.0171 Average stack opacity (%) 5% 5% W ater flow rate to scrubber (gpm) 450 450 Percent of scrubber water from recycled wastewater 95% 95%
Source of scrubbing water and ty pe of pretreatment. Substance(s) added as part of pretreatment and amount used (gpm or lbs/hr) City water- N/A City water- N/A HAP composition of wastewater (mg/L) 0 0

Concentration (mg/L) of dissolved and suspended solids in scrubbing water Dissolved Solids 10,221 ppm

. Suspended Solids 256 ppm

. Dissolved Solids 10,221 ppm

. Suspended Solids 256 ppm

. Scrubbing water temperature ( ° F) 80 80 Liquid/gas ratio (gal/10 3 acfm) 3.44 4.02



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsPressure drop across scrubber (in. H 2 O gauge) NA NA

Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) 0 0 Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) 0 0 Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) 0 0 Method of wastewater disposal 0 0 Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) 854131.32 1518455.68 Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) 0 0 Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) 854131.32 1518455.68 Method of solid waste disposal Landfill Landfill Vendor guarantee on scrubber efficiency (attach copy ) NA NA Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures As needed As needed Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problem s solved? No No Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor scrubber performance, including parameters monitored Wa ter flow Wa ter flow Plans to replace or upgrade scrubber No No



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-3**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**III. Mechanical Collector** 

### No mechanical collector

For each Mechanical Collector: Mechanical Collector 1 Mechanical Collector 2 Mechanical Collector 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe of mechanical collector Gas flow rate to collector (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Overall pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) Vendor guarantee on mechanical collector efficiency (attach copy ) Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal
Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance, including parameters monitored



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsPlans to replace or upgrade mechanical collector



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-4**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**IV. Fabric Filter**

For each Fabric Filter: Fabric Filter 1 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Electric Melter Baghouse
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Electric melter, S166 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 39.835002 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.945713 Stack or vent height (units) 50.8 feet Stack or vent diameter (units) 2.0 feet Manufacturer and model Luhr Filter Date of original installation 6/1/2007 Number of compartments 4 Number of bags per compartment 96 Filter material and coatings applied Fabric Fabric weight (oz/yd 2 ) 10.32 Filter surface area (ft 2 ) 3186 Gas flow rate to filter (acfm @ ° F) 5513 Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 185.3 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 185.3 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Unknown Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.00612 Average stack opacity (%) 1.52 Overall pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) 2-4" Method and frequency of bag cleaning Jet Pulse/Continuous Vendor guarantee on fabric filter efficiency (attach copy ) No Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) 182,500 Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) 182,500 Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) 0 Method of solid waste disposal 0



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsNature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Sem i-annual inlet feed pipe inspection and cleaning. Bag replacment 4 to 5 years. Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved? None Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance, including parameters monitored Delta P Plans to replace or upgrade fabric filter See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-5**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**V. Thermal Incinerator** 

### No thermal incinerator

For each Thermal Incinerator: Thermal Incinerator 1 Thermal Incinerator 2 Thermal Incinerator 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number)
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Fuel ty pe: gas or oil Fuel consumption rate (BTU/hr) Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Combustion chamber gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Excess air (%) Residence time (sec) at temperature ( ° F) Percent heat recovery Vendor guarantee on incinerator efficiency (attach copy ) Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved?



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsContinuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor

incinerator performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade thermal incinerator



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-6**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VI. High Velocity A ir Filter (HVA**  **F)** 

### No HVAF

For each HVAF: HVAF 1 HVAF 2 HVAF 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number)
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) W ater spray

pressure (sdig), if applicable W ater spray

rate (gpm), if applicable Filter face velocity

(acfm/ft 2 )

Maximum pressure drop across mat (in. H 2 O gauge)
Vendor guarantee on HVAF efficiency (attach copy ) Method and frequency of filter mad advancement Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) Method of wastewater disposal Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsQuantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved?
Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor HVAF performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade HVAF



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-7**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VII. Mist Eliminator**

For each Mist Eliminator: Mist Eliminator 1 Mist Eliminator 2 Mist Eliminator 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 7602 Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 plot plan) Line 2 Forming & Collection Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 39.835025 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.915447 Stack or vent height (units) 196.8 feet Stack or vent diameter (units) 9 feet Manufacturer and model JM Proprietary Date of original installation 2009 Ty pe of mist eliminator Chevron Gas flow rate to mist eliminator (acfm @ ° F) 131000 Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 200 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 110 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Unknown Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.039 Average stack opacity (%) 5% Velocity

in m ist elim inator (ft/sec) Unknown Pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) 2-4 For chevron blade mist eliminators: Spacing between blades (in.) 4 W ashing frequency of blades 60 days For mesh pad mist eliminators: NA Number of pads or elements NA Thickness of pad (in.) or element dimensions NA Density

of pad, (lb/ft 3 ) NA W ashing frequency of pad NA
Vendor guarantee on mist eliminator efficiency (attach copy ) None Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) NA



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsAmount of wastewater recycled (gpd) NA

Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) NA Method of wastewater disposal NA Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) NA Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) NA Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) NA Method of solid waste disposal NA
Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures As needed Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? No Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor mist eliminator performance, including parameters monitored NA Plans to replace or upgrade mist eliminator See CBI submittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-8**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 
**VIII. Ventilation System**
For each Ventilation System: Ventilation System 1 Ventilation System 2 Ventilation System 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) For general or building ventilation: Ventilation system used Airflow control system used Number of air changes per hour For unit or local ventilation: Enclosure or hood design used Volume of enclosure or hood Capture velocity (ft/sec) Distance between hood and emission source (ft)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM C-9**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**IX. Other**

For each Other Air Pollution Control Device (APCD): Other APCD 1 Other APCD 2 Other APCD 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Description



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM D**

**PROCESS LINE STA RTUP A**  **ND SHUTDOWN**
1. For each startup and shutdown (SS) that occurred during the last five years, please provide the following information requested in A. through J.

A. Using the definitions provided above, indicate whether the event was a startup or shutdown; Startup in 2007 B. A description of the event, including identification of the
em issions source or sources associated with the startup or shutdown; Startup of the new electric melter and process lines 2 & 3 C. W hether any

permit condition was exceeded and, if so, what permit condition was exceeded; NA

D. W hether the event was covered by any contingency

plan for controlling emissions during startup and shutdown events and, if so, whether the plan was followed; if the plan was not followed, why not; NA E. The duration of the event; NA F. The actions taken to minimize emissions during the event, including the use of any backup control systems; NA G. Estimates or measurements, if any , of emissions during the event; if you did not have the ability to quantify

emissions during the event, please explain why ; NA H. W hether the emission profile of each unit was different during startup and shutdown than during normal operating conditions and, if so, how emissions were different and why ; please provide any supporting information; NA I. All performance test data collected during each period of SS; the test method used for each event; when the testing was conducted and why ; the test conditions at the time of testing; and whether the tests were associated with a routine startup or shutdown; and NA J. All monitoring data, including control system parameter
mo nitoring, collected during each period of SS. NA Startup: the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. Shutdown: the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsIf this information is contained in periodic and immediate SS reports

(either stand-alone or contained within the periodic excess emissions report) submitted to your permitting authority , you may submit copies of those reports instead.
2. Are there any

ty pes of startup or shutdown events that you have been able to elim inate? If so, please describe the ty pe of event and explain how these events were elim inated. NA 3. Please submit a copy of your SS plan if you are required to develop one. NA 4. Please provide all performance test data collected during periods of SS over the last 5 years. Indicate the test method used for each event. NA 5. Please provide all m onitoring data, including control system parameter monitoring, collected during periods of SS over the last 5 ye ars. NA 6. Optional: Do you wish to recommend a standard that would apply during startup or shutdown? If so, please describe the event to which the standard would apply ; the recommended standard (this could be an emission limitation, work practice, or operational standard) that would apply during the period; the basis for the recommended standard; why and how the standard would m inim ize
em issions during the event; and how would compliance be determined and/or monitored.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM E**

**PRESENCE OF AIR POLLUTANTS IN EMISSION POINTS a** 
Please provide any existing emissions information and data covering hazardous air pollutants (HAP) and particulate matter (PM) for each listed process. Identify the appropriate box for w hich you are providing specific process information and/or pollutant emissions data.

**Melting Forming**  **Curing Cooling** 

Particulate Matter (PM, PM 2.5, PM Condensable) NA NA NA NA Chromium Compounds and Hexavalent Chromium (including any Cr speciation data) NA NA NA NA Other metal HAP (As, Be, Cd, Co, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se) NA NA NA NA Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) NA NA NA NA The existing data requested here has been provided to EPA by the industry’s trade association, the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (“NAIMA”). The existing data provided by NAIMA w as set forth in NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA. The representative existing emissions data provided from fiber glass companies included test results for the follow ing pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury, and hexavalent chromium. The representative existing emissions data provided from mineral w ool companies included test results for the follow ing pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbonyl sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury, and hexavalent chromium. The scope of the existing data provided w as the result of consensus reached by EPA, NAIMA, and industry representatives. In addition to the existing data submitted to EPA, extensive new

emissions data is being collected from virtually all companies through the “BTEC, Inc. Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Mineral W ool and W ool Fiberglass Emissions Test Program.” This Test Program w ill collect and submit to EPA, through EPA’s Electronic Reporting Tool, representative emissions data for the follow ing pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbonyl sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury, and hexavalent chromium.

Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) NA NA NA NA Formaldehyde NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA Methanol NA NA NA NA Other organic HAP NA NA NA NA

EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**FORM F-1**

**COST**
**I. Process Unit (e.g., cupola, curing oven, etc.):**

For each Process Unit: Process Unit 1 Process Unit ID All Units Process Line ID
**II. Capital Costs**

Base year JM objects to this request in its entirety

because it seeks information that is not relevant to the EPA Adm inistrator’s review obligations pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2). Total capital cost, including costs for individual pieces, if available. See Above **III. A nnual Operating Costs**  Base year (most recent fiscal year) See Above Total annual operating costs See Above
Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item ) See Above Raw m aterials costs See Above Labor ($/y r) for each labor class See Above (hr/hr) for each labor class See Above Utilities (breakdown for each utility ) See Above W aste treatment and/or disposal See Above Costs associated with any work practices and pollution prevention techniques that are employed at your facility See Above Savings associated with heat recovery and wastewater and/or solid waste returned to process from APCD (or sold to another user) See Above Indirect costs See Above Other (specify ) See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsPlease provide the annual report to shareholders or equivalent for the most

recent fiscal year. If reports are not available, provide annual sales and profits (or profit margin) for the most recent fiscal year. If company is publicly owned, please provide a web link to this information. See Above

Identify the market range (regional, national, international) of your products. N/A Can your product(s) be substituted by another product(s)? If so, please list yo ur product(s) and substituted product(s).

Identify the market range (regional, national, international) of your products. National

Can your product(s) be substituted by another product(s)? If so, please list yo ur product(s) and substituted product(s). Wo ol fiberglass is used as insulation, as are cellulose (scrap newspaper) treated to resist fires, spray

foam, foam boards, cotton treated to resist fires, and sheep wool treated to resist fires. W ool fiberglass insulation is preferred over these alternative insulation
ma terials because it is easily , economically , and safety installed in various building settings, has superior fire performance capabilities, and a 70- ye ar history

of proven performance and durability

.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls**COST**

**I. A ir Pollution Control Device (A**  **PCD)** See form F-1

For each APCD: APCD 1 APCD ID Process Unit ID

**II. Capital Costs**

Base year JM objects to this request in its entirety because it seeks information that is not relevant to the EPA Adm inistrator’s review obligations pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2). APCD equipm ent purchase cost and what was included See Above List the cost for each piece of auxiliary equipm ent for each APCD not included above See Above Installation cost See Above Land purchase cost See Above Total capital cost See Above Method of financining APCD See Above Retrofit installation See Above Field erected or modular See Above

**III. A nnual Operating Costs**  Base year (most recent fiscal year) See Above Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item ) See Above Raw m aterials costs See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xlsLabor

($/y r) for each labor class See Above (hr/hr) for each labor class See Above Utilites (breackdown for each utility ) See Above W aste treatment and/or disposal See Above Indirect costs See Above Other (specify ) See Above Total annual operating cost (most recent fiscal year) See Above

Attach annual report to shareholders or equivalent for the most recent fiscal year. Alternatively , if company is publicly

owned, you can provide your company's web link to this information. See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0007.xls