alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certifications of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Terra Tech Corp. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:





|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                              





|                    |     |                                       | 
|------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------- | 
|Date: June 27, 2017 | By: | /s/ Derek Peterson                    | 
|                    |     | Derek Peterson                        | 
|                    |     | President and Chief Executive Officer | 



The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Terra Tech Corp. and will be retained by Terra Tech Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. F. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ J. F. Robertson J. F. Robertson Chief Executive Officer  Dated:  November 14, 2008
|     |  |                                                                                             |  |                        |  |                                          
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |                                                                                             |  |                        |  |                                          
|     |  | KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants PO Box 10426 777
Dunsmuir Street Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3
Canada |  | Telephone Fax
Internet |  | (604) 691-3000
(604) 691-3031
www.kpmg.ca

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no. 333-169311) on Form F-10 of Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation of our report dated March 30, 2011, except for notes 14 (b) and (c), which are as of June 3, 2011
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 20-F of Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

June 3, 2011
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Barbara Ann Dominey, Individually, and

as Trustee of the Dominey Exempt Bypass

Trust, the Dominey Non

- Exempt Bypass

Trust, the Dominey 2012 Irrevocable Trust

f/b/o Elena Marquarita Dominey Langston,

Teresa Eddinger, and Allison Allen, co

trustees of the Dominey Insurance Trust of

1993, and Estate of Samuel Dominey Jr.,

Appellants,

v.

Elena Marquarita Dominey Langston,

Florence Olivia Dominey Campbell, and

Matthew David Dominey, Beneficiaries of

the Dominey 2012 Irrevocable Trust, the

Dominey Exempt Bypass Trust, the

Dominey Non

- Exempt Bypass Trust, and

the Dominey Insurance Trusts of 1993,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00187

- CV

Appeal from the

278 th District Court

of Walker County, Texas

(TC# 2130121)

O R D E R

The parties have filed a second joint motion to abate this appeal based on settlement. The

Court finds good cause to grant this abatement. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal to be abated

until October 23 , 2022. The appellate timetable will be suspended during the abatement. The

parties are directed to notify the Court whether the dispute has been resolved and to file the motion

necessary to dispose of the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1), (2). If the parties are2

unsuccessful in resolving the appeal by agreement, the appeal will be reinstated and the

Appellants’ brief will be due 20 days from the date of the reinstatement order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9 th day of September

, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
CHARLESTON.

#### Fox *v.*City of Hinton.

Submitted March 1, 1911.

Decided April 16, 1912.

Appeal and *Error*— Dismissal—QrounAs.

A final judgment of a circuit court dismissing a declaration on demurrer over the express exception of plaintiff, brought here for review on writ of error, can not by affidavits be shown to be a judgment by consent so as to effect a dismissal of the writ of error.

Error to Circuit Court, Summers County.

Action by J. A. Pox against the City of Hinton. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

*Reversed and Remanded.*

*R. F. Dunlap,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. N. Read,*for defendant in error.

Robinson, Judge:

The writ of error relates to a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the declaration in an action for damages to plaintiff’s property by a change of street grade made by defendant city.

Concededly, the declaration is good. The question of its sufficiency is not contested. But, on a motion to dismiss the writ of error, defendant undertakes to show by affidavits that the judgment was entered by consent. It is claimed that a compromise of the litigation was agreed to by the attorneys, and the order dismissing the declaration on demurrer was entered for that reason. It seems that the city did not ratify the act of its attorney in regard to the proposed settlement, and that plaintiff, therefore, proposes to go on with his action by reversing the erroneous judgment entered on demurrer to the declaration.

Subsequent to the award of the writ of error the attorneys for the city moved the circuit court to set aside the order appealed from, and the circuit court entered an order purporting to set aside that order and to re-inst-ate the case in that court. Of course at that time the order undertaken to be set aside had *655become final by the expiration of tbe terra at which it was entered. The court had no power to change it.

We must overrule the motion to dismiss the writ of error. The record on which that writ was awarded sustains the writ. We can not change the record of the judgment by reading the affidavits. The judgment is a verity. It can not be shown by affidavit to be other than what it purports to be. It shows itself to be a final judgment on demurrer, entered over the express exception of the plaintiff. It is anything but a judgment by consent. The judgment can not be impeached and its character changed by affidavit. If it was a consent order the circuit court should not have given it another character when that court entered it. The court speaks by its record, not by affidavits in the country.

Since the declaration is sufficient, the judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action must be reversed, the demurrer overruled, and the case remanded to be further pro-ceded in.

*Reversed and Remanded.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# AGENCY:

United States Agency for International Development.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA).

*Date:*                     Thursday, January 18, 2018.                

*Time:*                     2:00-4:00 p.m.                          ( print page 61743)    

*Location:*                     Horizon Ballroom, The Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC 20004.                

## Purpose

The Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA) brings together USAID and private voluntary organization officials, representatives from universities, international nongovernment organizations, U.S. businesses, and government, multilateral, and private organizations to foster understanding, communication, and cooperation in the area of foreign aid.

## Agenda

                    USAID leadership will make opening remarks, followed by a presentation and discussion on the principles, benchmarks, and programs that the Agency is considering to support countries along their development journey to self-reliance and long-term prosperity. The full meeting agenda will be forthcoming on the ACVFA website at                     *http://www.usaid.gov/​who-we-are/​organization/​advisory-committee.*

## Stakeholders

                    The meeting is free and open to the public. Persons wishing to attend should register online at                     *http://www.usaid.gov/​who-we-are/​organization/​advisory-committee.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jessica Klein,                         *acvfa@usaid.gov*                         or 202-712-5856.                    

Dated: December 18, 2017.

Jessica Klein,

Acting Executive Director, U.S. Agency for International Development.

[FR Doc. 2017-28152 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carroll ShelbyInternational Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the periodending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Luft, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 16, 2004 | /s/    | JOHN LUFT                                                   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | John Luft,  President, Chief Financial Officer and Director |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 19, 2011 

d1012 

Order 

 

October 19, 2011 

142519(79) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142519 

 COA: 283056 

Wayne CC: 07-013349-FC 

NATHAN EMMANUEL JACOBS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 22, 2011 

order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated June 22, 2011. 

On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2010 judgment of 

the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in light of the 

parties’ stipulation that the defendant is entitled to a new trial, we VACATE the 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for 

a new trial.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of PSP Industries, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Min-Chul Shin, CEO and President and Young-Kyung Lee, CFO of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:October 13, 2011By:/s/ Min-Chul ShinMin-Chul ShinCEO, President and DirectorDate:October 13, 2011By:/s/ Young-Kyung LeeYoung-Kyung LeeCFO and Director
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63

of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Peter G. Leemputte, Chief Financial Officer of Mead Johnson Nutrition Company, certify that (i) Mead Johnson Nutrition
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in Mead Johnson
Nutrition Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mead Johnson Nutrition Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 27, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Peter G. Leemputte                                           
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Peter G. Leemputte Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 421 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Chinese Communist Party should be held accountable for present day efforts of 

knowingly and intentionally manipulating their currency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2023 

Mr. SANTOS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the Chinese Communist Party should be held accountable 

for present day efforts of knowingly and intentionally 

manipulating their currency. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the Chinese Communist Party for 

3 knowingly and intentionally manipulating its cur4 rency; 

5 (2) supports the actions by Former Secretary 

6 Mnuchin under the Trump administration to engage 

7 with the International Monetary Fund to eliminate 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 421 IH 

1 the unfair competitive advantage created by China 

2 in 2019; and 

3 (3) calls on the Biden administration to take 

4 similar action to hold the Chinese Communist Party 

5 accountable for their present day efforts to manipu6 late their currency. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NO. 12-14-00070-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

PRESTON ROBERT MOODY, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 217TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant 

and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion 

to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered April 17, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 17, 2014

NO. 12-14-00070-CR

PRESTON ROBERT MOODY,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 217th District Court 

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2013-0506)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 8943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3554]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7798]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Rembrandt's Self-Portrait''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Rembrandt's Self-Portrait,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY from on or about April 5, 2012 until on or 
about May 28, 2012; and, as part of an exhibition called 
``Gainsborough, Rembrandt, Van Dyck: The Treasures of Kenwood House, 
London,'' the further display of the object at the Museum of Fine Arts, 
Houston from on or about June 3, 2012 until on or about September 4, 
2012; the Milwaukee Art Museum from on or about October 4, 2012 until 
on or about January 6, 2013; the Seattle Art Museum from on or about 
February 14, 2013 until on or about May 19, 2013; and the Arkansas Art 
Center from on or about June 6, 2013 until on or about September 9, 
2013; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined; is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 9, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-3554 Filed 2-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```