alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Richard Smitten, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Stock Market
Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

<PAGE>

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ RICHARD SMITTEN
-------------------
Richard Smitten
CEO and CFO

August 16, 2005
### SPA 14 

# • RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 110: COke-By-Products Listings (cont'd) RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 110 Coke By-Products Listings 57 FR 37284-37306

August 18, 1992 (RCRA Cluster III, HWSA provisions)

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS:

.. WAC 173-303· EQUIV- LESS MORE BROADER ALENT STRIN- STRIN- IN SCOPE· GENT GENT PART 261 - IDENTIFICATIONAND LISTING OF HAZARDOUSWASTE SUBPARTA - GENERAL 

# t EXCLUSIONS 

# • replace "No. K087" 261.4(a)(10) 071(3)(cc) X with "Nos. K060, K087, K141, K142, K143, K144, K145, K147 and K148"; replace "Section" with "section"; insert comma after "of this part"; replace "tar or are" with "tar, or"; replace "refining process" with "recovery or refining processes, or mixed with coal tar" SUBPART D - L1STS·OFHAZARDOUS WASTES HAZARDOUSWASTES FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES add K141-K145, K147 and K148 in alphanumeric order to the subgroup "Coking" as specified at 57 FR 37305 261.32 9904 

### X


# •

CL110.14- Revised: 7/28193 Printed: 7/24/98 August 18, 1992 - Page 1 of 2: SPA 14

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 110: COke-By-Products Listings (cont'd)
APPENDIXVII TO PART 261 

# o

BASIS FOR LISTING HAZARDOUSWASTE add K141-K145, K147 and K148 in alphanumeric order as specified at 57 FR 37305 261, Appendix VII 082(4) X

..



# o

CL110.14 - Revised: 7/28/93 Printed: 7/24/98 August 18, 1992 - Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,343]

Air Products and Chemicals Inc., Electronics Division, Easton, 
PA; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 23, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Air 
Products and Chemicals Inc., Electronics division, Easton, 
Pennsylvania.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-7109 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
Hillary FENNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WILLIAMSBURG HOMEOWNERS ASSOC., INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Derrell M. WADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81059

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: February 26, 2019

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges *86**Order**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Derrell Wade appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[No. 51742-2-I.

Division One.

May 10, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Larry Donell Warren, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-04252-6, Steven C. Gonzalez, J., entered January 13, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**Exhibit 33.1**

 

MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

 

Protective Life Insurance Company (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria specified in item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB, except for the criteria in Appendix A, which we have concluded are not applicable to the servicing of our Protective Life Secured Trust Notes (the “Platform”) or are not serviced by the Asserting Party (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Platform serviced by the Asserting Party listed in Appendix B.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

Protective Life Insurance Company

 
| By:                       | /s/ LANCE BLACK                     |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:                     | Lance Black                         |   |
| Title:                    | Senior Vice President and Treasurer |   |
|                      |                                |
| Date: March 25, 2014 |                                |

 

----

 

APPENDIX A SERVICING CRITERIA NOT APPLICABLE TO ASSERTING PARTY

 

The following servicing criteria of 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable to the platform and included in The Bank of New York Mellon’s assertion (see Exhibit 33.2 to the 10-K), but excluded from the Asserting Party’s assertion:

 

229.1122(d)(1)(i)-(ii)

229.1122(d)(2)(i) — (vii)

229.1122(d)(3)(ii) — (iv)

229.1122(d)(4)(i) — (v)

229.1122(d)(4)(vii)

229.1122(d)(4)(xv)

 

The following servicing criteria of 1122(d) of Regulation AB are not provided for in the underlying documentation of the platform and, therefore, not applicable to the platform:

 

229.1122(d)(1)(iii) — (iv)

229.1122(d)(4)(vi)

229.1122(d)(4)(viii)

229.1122(d)(4)(x) — (xiv)

 

2

----

 

APPENDIX B INDIVIDUAL TRUSTS RELATED TO PROGRAM

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the following trusts:

 

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-6

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-3

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-4

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-5

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-6

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-7

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-8

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-9

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-10

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-11

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-12

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-13

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-20

 

3

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): CDC Grants for Public Health Research Dissertation, Panel D, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) PAR07-231 

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting. 

*Time and Date:*                         9 p.m.-5 a.m., May 14, 2009 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “CDC Grants for Public Health Research Dissertation, Panel D, FOA PAR07-231.”                     

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Susan B. Stanton, D.D.S., Scientific Review Officer, Office of the Director, Office of the Chief Science Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-4640.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: March 23, 2009. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. E9-7010 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
----

----

I Informacija

Komisija

----

BENDRASIS ŽEMĖS ŪKIO AUGALŲ RŪŠIŲ VEISLIŲ KATALOGAS

23-ojo pilno leidimo 4-asis papildymas

(2005/C 145 A/01)

TURINYS

Paaiškinimai

Žemės ūkio augalų rūšių sąrašas

LEGENDA

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

16A.× FESTULOLIUM

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

24.POA NEMORALIS L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

III

55.BRASSICA RAPA L. VAR. SILVESTRIS (LAM.) BRIGGS

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

73.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH

74.SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

75.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH × SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----

(1)OL C 46 A, 2005 2 22, p. 1. Paskutiniai katalogo pakeitimai buvo atlikti 3-iame papildyme (OL C 111 A, 2005 5 11, p. 1).

(2)OL L 193, 2002 7 20, p. 1. Direktyva su paskutiniais pakeitimais, padarytais Europos Parlemento ir Tarybos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 1829/2003 (OL L 268, 2003 10 18, p. 1).

----
Andre Legay WALLACE v. STATE

CR-15-1324

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 374-375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:


[[Page 375]]


    Docket Numbers: ER18-547-000.
    Applicants: Decatur Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: MBR Tariff Revisions and 
Triennial Update to be effective 12/28/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/27/17.
    Accession Number: 20171227-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-548-000.
    Applicants: CP Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: MBR Tariff Revisions and 
Triennial Update to be effective 12/28/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/27/17.
    Accession Number: 20171227-5064.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-549-000.
    Applicants: CPI USA North Carolina LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: MBR Tariff Revisions and 
Triennial Update to be effective 12/28/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/27/17.
    Accession Number: 20171227-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-550-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: CLGIA and DSA for the Casa 
Diablo 4 Project, SA Nos. 986-987 to be effective 12/28/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/27/17.
    Accession Number: 20171227-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 27, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-28344 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 9, 2005
Before Hon. Richard D. Cudahy,Circuit Judge Hon. Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge Hon. Terence T. Evans, Circuit Judge

IFC CREDIT CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Appeal from the United States District ) Court for the Eastern District of ) Wisconsin No. 04-2096 v. ) ) No. 02 C 1015 ) Aaron E. Goodstein, Magistrate Judge BULK PETROLEUM CORPORATION ) and DARSHAN S. DHALIWAL ) ) Defendants-Appellants. )
ORDER On consideration of the petition for rehearing of plaintiff-appellant filed on April 29, 2005, in the above-captioned case, all of the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing. Therefore, the petition is DENIED. The opinion is hereby amended as follows: On page 8, lines 10-12, first full paragraph, should read: “Here, by contrast, there was no misrepresentation or proactive deception; Bulk merely sent the check to the wrong party.”
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-4000

___________ In re: Michael Dey; Justin Victoria; * On Petition for Writ Jeannemarie Durocher, * of Mandamus * Petitioners. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: January 4, 2007 Filed: January 17, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Dey, Justin Victoria, and Jeannemarie Durocher (collectively, petitioners) filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to vacate its orders refu sing to quash the trial subpoenas served to petitioners.
In the underlying matter, which is not related to the issues on appeal, a plaintiff sued Wyeth, Inc. and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc (collectiv ely, Wyeth). The plaintiff subpoenaed the petitioners, who are employees of Wyeth and were served more than 100 miles from the place of the trial. The petitioners filed motions to quash the subpoenas arguing the subpoenas were not properly served pursuant to Federal Rule1 “Subject to [Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii)], a subpoena may be served at any place within the district of the court by which it is issued, or at any place without the district that is within 100 miles of the place of the deposition, hearing, trial, production, or inspection specified in the subpoena or atany place within the state where a state statute or rule of court permits service of a subpoena issued by a st ate court of general jurisdiction sitting in the place of the de position, hearing, trial, production, or inspection specified in the subpoena.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(2) -2- of Civil Procedure 45(b)(2). 1 The district court deniedpetitioners’ motions to quash. Petitioners filed a petition for writ of mandamus.

The writ of mandamus “is a ‘drastic a nd extraordinary’ remedy ‘reserved for really extraordinary causes.’” Ch eney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the D.C. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) (quoting Ex Parte Fahey , 332 U.S. 258, 259-60 (1947)). “To ensure that mandamus remains an extraordinary remedy, petitioners must show that they lack adequate alternative means to obtain the relief they seek and carry the burden of showing that their right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable.” Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the S. Dist. of Iowa , 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989) (citations, quotation marks, and alterations omitted). Here, assuming arguendo petitioners are entitled to relief, petitioners have ade quate alternative means to obtain relief because petitioners can refuse to comply with the subpoenas, endure contempt sanctions, if any, and immediately appeal those sanc tions. Gialde v. Time, Inc. , 480 F.2d 1295, 1300 (8th Cir. 1973) (citing United States v. Ryan , 402 U.S. 530, 532-33 (1971)); see also U.S. Catholic Conference v. Aborti on Rights Mobilization, Inc. , 487 U.S. 72, 76 (1988) (“The order finding a nonparty witness in cont empt is appealable notwithstanding the absence of a final judgment in the underlying action.”).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

______________________________
August 8, 2016

Mr. Alan Schmidt

Alan A. Schmidt

1150 N Loop 1604 W

Suite #108-283

San Antonio, TX 78258

Re: FAA–2016–3878

Dear Mr. Schmidt:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst