alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Johnny S. PEREZ, Appellant, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent.

WD 81474

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: January 15, 2019 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 26, 2019 Application for Transfer Denied April 30, 2019

Daniel J. Cohen, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Craig M. Leff and Brian M. Bartlett, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, Presiding Judge, and Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Johnny S. Perez appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, entered following a jury verdict in favor of BNSF Railway Company on Mr. Perez's Federal Employees Liability Act claim for work-related personal injuries. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending May 31, 2010 of ALARMING DEVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira
 Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira
 
 President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
 Principal Financial Officer
 
 
 Dated:  June 23, 2010
***For the SIP Call proposal, we could add this biomass CFI text on p. 51,

under "Definition and Calculation of Amount of GHGs."

We note that in this rulemaking, we are not addressing the issue of

accounting for emissions of GHGs from bioenergy and other

biogenic sources (which are generated during the combustion or

decomposition of biologically based material such as forest or

agriculture products). When we finalized the Tailoring Rule, we

noted that EPA planned to seek comment on how to address emissions of

biogenic CO2 under the PSD and title V programs through future action, such as a separate

Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) (75 FR at 31591). Accordingly, we recently

issued a Call for Information (CFI) to solicit public comment and data

on technical issues that might be used to consider biomass fuels and the emissions resulting

from their combustion differently with regard to applicability under PSD and with regard to

the BACT review process under PSD. See “Call for

Information: Information on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with

Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources,” 75 FR 41173 (July 15, 2010).

Additional information on this CFI is available at

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/biogenic_emissions.html

. In the CFI we stated:

"In response to this Call for Information,

interested parties are invited to assist EPA in the following way:

(1) Surveying and assessing the science by submitting research

studies or other relevant information, and

(2) evaluating different accounting approaches and options by providing policy

analyses,proposed or published methodologies, or other relevant information.

Interested parties are also invited to submit data or other relevant

information about the current and projected scope of GHG emissions

from bioenergy and other biogenic sources." 75 FR 41174

Without prejudging the outcome of the CFI process, EPA anticipates that the comments we

receive in response to the CFI, with regard to applicability under PSD and with regard to

the BACT review process under PSD, will inform any subsequent actions, as appropriate, to

address applicability of emissions of GHGs from bioenergy and other biogenic sources under

the PSD program.

NOTE: EPA proposes to use the same language in both the SIP call and FIP proposals
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and result of operations. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |                                                   |               |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                       | LINK SCAFFOLD PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.(REGISTRANT) |
|                       |                                                   |               |
| Date: October 7, 2010 | By:                                                    | /s/ Eli Elbaz |
|                       | Eli ElbazActing Chief Financial Officer                |
**EXHIBIT
      32**




Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
      and
      (b) of


Section
      1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Asia Global Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
      2006
      (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Asia Global Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Asia Global Holdings Corp.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Date:November
                19, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Michael MakMichael
                Mak, President and
              Chief
                Executive Officer




By:
            /s/ Michael MakMichael
                Mak, Chief Financial Officer
[Nos. 48662-4-I; 50830-0-I; 50135-6-I.

Division One.

June 14, 2004.]

#### *In the Matter of*Paul Trummel. Paul Trummel, *Appellant,*v. Stephen Mitchell, et al., *Respondents.*Stephen Mitchell, et al., *Appellants,*v. Paul Trummel, *Respondent.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-2-04698-5, James A. Doerty, J., entered April 19 and October 23, 2001, and June 21, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Appelwick and Schindler, JJ.
EXHIBIT 35.1
 VW Credit, Inc. Servicer Compliance Statement Under Item 1123 of Regulation AB
   1.
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from December 29, 2008
through December 31, 2008, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
was conducted under my supervision.2.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout
such period.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the
Servicer this thirtieth day of March, 2009.
 /s/Andrew StuartAndrew StuartExecutive Vice President & CFO
SB-2











Exhibit 10.9  



		
		
		
	Copy No. - ________________________	Provided to - __________________ 







SECOND AMENDMENT TO
CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM 






FutureIT Inc. 



Up to 70 Units, each Unit consisting of

100,000 shares of Common Stock and

Warrants to purchase 46,200 shares of Common Stock

at $30,000 per Unit 







The Confidential  Private  Placement  Memorandum  dated May 10, 2007 pf FutureIT,  Inc. will be amended as
set out below.




This Second Amendment to Confidential
Private Placement Memorandum is made such that: the First Closing (as defined in the
Private Placement Memorandum) date shall be extended to October 15, 2007 (or to October
30, 2007 according to the Company’s sole discretion). 



The following terms will be amended
as follows: 



	 	1. 	The
paragraph entitled “The Offering” under the chapter                “SUMMARY” will
read as follows: “We are offering to eligible investors up to 70 Units in
the Company at $30,000 per                Unit. Each Unit consists of 100,000
shares of our Common Stock and                warrants to purchase 46,200 shares of our
Common Stock at $0.50 per                share (the “Warrants”). The
Warrants will be exercisable until the earlier of (i) 30 months from the SB-2
registration becoming effective,                or (ii) the Closing of a Qualified
IPO or merger or acquisition that                results in a change of control. The
Offering is being made by J. H.                Darbie & Co, Inc., our
exclusive Placement Agent (see “SUMMARY OF                PROPOSED TERMS”).
Any closing (the “First Closing”) of                the Offering is subject to
our receipt, on or before October 15,                2007 (which may be
extended to October 30, 2007 in the Company’s sole discretion) of duly
completed subscriptions for a minimum of 25 Units for                aggregate gross proceeds
of $750,000 (the “Minimum Offering”).                If the maximum number of
Units offered is sold (i.e., 70 Units), the                gross proceeds to the
Company would be $2,100,000 (the “Maximum                Offering”). 






	 	
If
less than 70 Units are sold at the First Closing, we plan to continue the Offering and
hold  one or more additional closings until the earlier of (i) the receipt of
sufficient  subscriptions for the Maximum Offering, or (ii) October 30,
2007.” All other terms of said paragraph remain unchanged. 










The date of this Second Amendment to Confidential Private Placement Memorandum is September
18, 2007.
REOISCOV f R 

# CAYC E ane w kin dofci ^ 

### CIT Y O FCAYC E M.uo/ i ELIS E ?.\K1\ \ MAyo/ i Pao-rn i JAME S E . [ESKIN S COLWa i M£M3£fiS KENNET H D . )L.\IFE R RICHAR D N . MYER S STEV E ISO M Or.M^.\'.)i:£f i Assjsr.\.\ T On'M-WAC'E N TAMMY RBERKLEY Septembe r

17,201 0 Ms . Aloh aLe y Actin g Associat e Director , X-5 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E W86-31 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Subject : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Gran t Applicatio n Docke t OST-2010-012 4 Columbi aMetropolita n Airpor t - Columbia , S C i^- * T T L O c r '_'jL"-;f l '

-~~'•\Z:'~'— '

Dea r Ms . Ley : Th e City o f

Cayc e Counci l strongl y support s th e abov e reference dgran t applicatio n tha t

wil l suppor t ne w an dimprove dai r

servic e fromth e Columbi aMetropolita n Airport . Th e succes s o f ne w servic e fromth e Columbi aMetropolita n Airpor t i s criticall y importan t

t o th e health an d growt ho f ou r city' s economy an dth e overal l Columbi abusines s community . Effectiv e thi s date , th e Cit y o f Cayc e Counci l ha s authorize dacommitmen t o f $2,000.0 0 for

th e purpos e o f

assistin g th e Columbi aMetropolita n Airpor t i n obtainin g additiona l schedule dcommercia l ai r service . Th e viabilit y o f ai r servic e improvement s wil l provid e a significan t

boos t t o economi c developmen t i n ou r communit y throug h improve dacces s for visitors , an dmos t

importantly , t o support

are abusinesses . W e ar e please dt o hav e th e opportunit y t o support thi s gran t

application . Sincerely ,

Elis e Partiri , Mayo r EP/tb cc : City o f

Cayc e Counci l Member s Mr . Steve n Brown , Interi mCit y Manage r

iSO O T^\LLH

M SiKLE T ' Pcs T Oftk T Bo \200 4 • C'.vci: . SoLT H CAKOUV \2917I-200- I TtL . \S03 ) 796-902 0 • f' w ^^803 > r90''-}Or 2 • \(. u Wtsi-ir E .\DIIK{.S> : vA\\'..^:iJ)CFCA'\t:E-^i:.-r.c \
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0648

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

WILLIAM JEROME CARNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until March 25, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 17 2022

02/17/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0648
P.1 

OAR Box 1840 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

20) IV-H-38 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/14/2008 1:02:57 PM Sheet 20 of 23 
P.2 

Bill Wehrum 

10/04/2002 09:08 AM 

To: Arthur G._Fraas@omb.eop.gov, lee.otisi 

cc: Jeff Holmstead/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: Netting Guidance 

A-90-37 

IV-H-38 

As discussed Wednesday night, attached is a 1990 EPA NSR guidance manual that describes in some 

detail how the Agency thinks that netting should be done. The netting discussion begins in earnest on p. 

A.34. 

wkshpman.pdf 

bee. i -V-c, 

-jr. - /\- »3 »o 

A-90-3 7 <locKc + 

-Cor a WokcUnr»cn"T 

v 

• ' ' 

• I 

DEW 2 2 2002 

EPA AIR DOCKET
#### Richard Schneidman et al., Respondents, v Stanley Tollman et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[718 NYS2d 827]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered May 18, 2000, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly held that plaintiffs have standing to interpose their amended complaint, since their individual claims are separate and independent from a claim on behalf of the partnership *(see, MK W. St. Co. v Meridien Hotels,*184 AD2d 312, 313). The motion court also properly found that plaintiffs’ amended pleadings were not time-barred, since they relate back to the original complaint, merely adding “additional factual detail” *(see, State of New York v St. James Nursing Home,*128 AD2d 694, 695). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Tom . and Friedman, *JJ.*
Exhibit 32.1 - Certifications








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Terry G. Bowering, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form 10-K of Cyber Informatix, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in this report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the  financial  condition  and results of operations of  Cyber Informatix, Inc.








Date:  September 24, 2010:





/s/ Terry G. Bowering


Terry G. Bowering, Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer,


Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Director
[No. 53265-1-I.

Division One.

May 10, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Daniel Bazzi Kaveh, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-8-03078-5, Julia Garratt, J. Pro Tern., entered October 16,2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Spring
        Creek Acquisition Corp.

      10F,
        Room#1005, Fortune Int’l Building

      No.17,
        North DaLiuShu Road

      Hai
        Dian
        District, Beijing 100081

      People’s
        Republic of China

       

      


       

      _________________,
        2007

      


      Live
        ABC
        Interactive Co., Ltd. Beijing

      [Address]

      [Address]

       

      Gentlemen:

       

      This
        letter will confirm our agreement that commencing on the effective date (the
        “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”)
        relating to the initial public offering of the securities of Spring Creek
        Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the consummation by the
        Company of a business combination or the distribution of the trust account
        to
        the Company’s then public shareholders (as described in the Registration
        Statement), Live ABC Interactive Co., Ltd. Beijing (the “Firm”) shall make
        available to the Company certain general and administrative services, including
        the use of office space, utilities and secretarial support, as may be required
        by the Company from time to time, at [10F, Room#1005, Fortune Int’l Building,
        No.17, North DaLiuShu Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic
        of China] (or any successor location). In exchange therefor, the Company
        shall
        pay the Firm at the rate of $7,500 per month. 

       

      Very
        truly yours,

      
        	 	 	 
	 	SPRING
                CREEK
                ACQUISITION CORP. 
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
                

                Name:
                  

                Title:
                  

              


      

       

       

      
        	
                Agreed
                  to and Accepted by:

                 

                LIVE
                  ABC INTERACTIVE CO., LTD. BEIJING   

              	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                By:  
                  

              	 	 	 	 
	 	
                

                Name:
                  

                Title:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                                                                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 14, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Circus and
Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
----

Action brought on 6 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-159/05)

(2005/C 132/35)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 6 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by D. Maidani, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period allowed for transposition of the Directive into national law expired on 27 December 2003.

----

(1)OJ L 168, 27.06.2002, p. 43.

----
Luis A. VILLEGAS-ROSA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81088

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: November 20, 2018

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge *28**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Appellant Luis Villegas-Rosa ("Villegas-Rosa") is appealing the denial of his Amended Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Villegas-Rosa sought to vacate his guilty plea and sentence to a class A felony of second degree murder pursuant to section 565.021. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40928

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSHUA DAVID COWAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:10-CR-4-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Joshua David Cowan has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Cowan has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cowan’s response. We concur

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 27, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40928 Document: 00511837982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/27/2012
No. 10-40928

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Cowan’s motion for the

appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

2

Case: 10-40928 Document: 00511837982 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/27/2012
exv10w4







	 	 	 	 	 



Ex. 10.4




EXTENSION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     This Extension of Employment Agreement is entered into effective as of this 1st day of
January, 2010 by and between David T. O’Connor (“Employee”) and Silverleaf Resorts, Inc., a Texas
corporation (“Silverleaf”). All terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) between Employee and Silverleaf
which was effective as of January 1, 2007 (the “Effective Date”).



RECITALS




     A. The Agreement was entered into effective as of January 1, 2007 and will expire under its
terms on the third anniversary of the Effective Date, which will be January 1, 2010.



     B. Employee and Silverleaf desire to extend the Term of the Agreement for an additional
two-year period.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and terms hereinafter set forth, the parties
agree as follows:



AGREEMENT




     1. The Term of the Agreement shall be extended for a further two-year period and shall now
expire on December 31, 2011.



     2. No other terms or provisions of the Agreement are affected hereby and the parties hereby
confirm and ratify all other terms and conditions of the Agreement, including Employee’s current
commissions based on the rates set forth in Exhibit “A.”



	 	 	 	 	 
	Dates of Execution: 	“SILVERLEAF”



SILVERLEAF RESORTS, INC.

 	 
	March 3, 2010 	By:  	/S/ ROBERT E. MEAD
 	 
	 	 	Robert E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	“EMPLOYEE”

 	 
	March 3, 2010 	By:  	/S/ DAVID T. O’CONNOR
 	 
	 	 	David T. O’Connor