alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### February 3, 2012 Mr . Paul MacDonald Plant Manager Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc. 171 Route 85 P. O . Box 169 Newfields, NH03856 Re: Draft Permit for Sealing Systems Manufacturing Operations and Proposed VOC RACT Order Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc. 171 Route 85, Newfields, NewHampshire Facility Identification #3301500046, Application # I1-0156 Dear Mr . MacDonald: The New

Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division ("DES"), has prepared adraft permit and a proposed VOCRACT Order for the device(s) noted below . A public notice inviting comments on the draft permit and proposed VOC RACT Order will be published in the New Hampshire Union Leader and the Exeter News Letter. Close of Comment

Devices Application Dates Notice Date Period Sealing Systems Manufacturing Operations November 9, 2009 F b 3 2012 2012 M h 5 e ruary , arc , VOCRACT Order August 11, 2011 The application is for a revision to the VOCRACT Order to incorporate the modification to a production line and installation of a new

thermal oxidizer control device, and to comply with the changes to the NHCode ofAdministrative Rules Env-A 1200, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Reasonable Available Control Technology (RACT) adopted June 1, 2011 for the other process lines at the facility. Acopy ofthe draft permit, proposed VOCRACT Order and public notice are enclosed. In accordance with Env-A 621 .05, and Env-A 1205.04(a), we are forwarding a copy ofthe draft permit and proposed VOCRACT Order, and public notice to the United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for their review . We are also forwarding a copy of the draft permit and proposed VOCRACT Order to the Town ofNewfields for their review . Comments must be received by DES by the close of the comment period. Ifyou have any questions regarding this permit or VOC RACT Order, please contact me at (603) 271-0901 or via e-mail at Ratricia.northgdes.nh.~Lov . Sincerely, Patricia R

. North Air Resources Division By certifiedmail # 7002 31500004 7243 7610 Enclosures: Draft Permit, Application Review Summary, Proposed VOCRACT Orderand Public Notice cc: Donald Dahl, USEPA Region I (via e-mail) Johnny Ray Evens, Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc. Town ofNewfields
Gregory STIENS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

WD 81738

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: February 19, 2019

Gregory Stiens, Appellant Pro-se.

Daryl R. Taylor, Kansas City, for Respondent Missouri Department of Agriculture.

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge *78***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Stiens appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") affirming the Appeal Tribunal's determination that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits based on his discharge for misconduct connected with work. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Order filed December 31, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-01055-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.L., A CHILD, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-29993

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”). 

The reporter’s record was due December 13, 2018. Court reporter Delores Johnson 

sought an extension until December 28, 2018 to file the record. We granted the 

extension and noted no further extensions would be granted absent extraordinary 

circumstances. The reporter’s record has not been filed. 
Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed.

See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible 

for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).

The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence the 

preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, if 

necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1).

Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated 

appeal, we order Delores Johnson to file the reporter’s record in this appeal by

January 10, 2019. If the record is not timely filed, we will order the trial court to conduct 

a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Petition for exemption
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,977]


Circuit Check Inc., Maple Grove, MN; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 23, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Circuit 
Check Inc., Maple Grove, Minnesota.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March, 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6292 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Amendment No. 3 to Rights Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT 
 This
Amendment No. 3 to Rights Agreement (this “Amendment No. 3”) is entered into on March 5, 2010, by and between OSI Systems, Inc., a California corporation (“Company”) and StockTrans, Inc., a Pennsylvania
Corporation, as rights agent (the “Rights Agent”). This Amendment No. 3 amends the terms and conditions of that certain Rights Agreement, dated July 31, 2000, by and between the Company and U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation (the
“Original Agreement”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated December 21, 2004, by and between the Company and U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation (“Amendment No. 1”) and by Amendment No. 2 to
Rights Agreement, dated January 30, 2009, by and between the Company and the Rights Agent (“Amendment No. 2”). The Original Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and this Amendment No. 3 is
collectively referred to herein as the “Rights Agreement.” 
 Recitals 
 Whereas, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has approved the reincorporation of the Company from California to
Delaware (the “Reincorporation”); 
 Whereas, if approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Company would
effectuate the Reincorporation by merging the Company with and into a newly formed, Delaware corporation (“OSI Delaware”) and upon the effectiveness of such merger (the “Merger”) the Company would cease to exist and OSI Delaware
would continue the business of the Company under the name “OSI Systems, Inc.”; and 
 Whereas, the Company desires to
terminate the Rights Agreement upon the effective time and date of the Merger. 
 Agreement 
 Now Therefore, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Rights Agent hereby
agree as follows: 
 1. This Amendment No. 3 shall not come into force or effect until the Merger is declared effective
under the laws of the state of Delaware (the “Effective Time”). 
 2. The definition of “Final Expiration
Date” in the Rights Agreement, and any and all references to July 31, 2018, are amended and replaced by this Amendment No. 3 with the time and date of the Effective Time. 
 3. This Amendment No. 3 may be executed in counterparts, including by way of facsimile or other electronic signature. 
 [Signature page follows.] 







 In Witness Whereof, the parties have signed this Amendment No. 3 as of the date first
written above. 
  

									
	OSI SYSTEMS, INC.	 		 	STOCKTRANS, INC.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Victor Sze
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert J. Winterle

	Name:	 	Victor Sze	 		 	Name:	 	Robert J. Winterle
	Its:	 	Executive Vice President & General Counsel	 		 	Its:	 	Vice President
Order filed December 31, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 01055

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF J .J.L., A CHILD , Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTEC TIVE SERVICES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 29993



### ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issu e (“parental termination case”). The reporter’s record was due December 13, 2018. Court reporter Delores Johnson sought an extension until December 28, 2018 to file the record. We granted the
extension and noted no further extensions would be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. The reporter’s record has not been filed.Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is fil ed.
See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).
The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence the

prepa ration of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, if

necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated appeal, we order Delores Johnson to file the reporter’s r ecord in this appeal by January 10, 2019

. If the record is not timely filed, we will order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Nakesha ALFRED, Appellant, v. Anthony J. LATO, Respondent.

No. ED 105211

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: September 12, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 23, 2017

Anthony G. Laramore, 10024 Office Center Drive, Suite 202, Saint Louis, MO. 63128, for appellant.

Donald J. Ohl, Jessica A. Bushur, Co-Counsel, 6100 Center Grove Rd., P.O. Box 446, Edwardsville, Il 62025, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

*8Nakesha Alfred ("Ms. Alfred") appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Anthony J. Lato ("Mr. Lato") on her common law claim of co-employee negligence arising from a workplace injury she suffered in 2013 while operating a metal press owned by her employer. Ms. Alfred raises two points on appeal. In Point I, Ms. Alfred argues the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Mr. Lato because the facts demonstrated Mr. Lato committed affirmative acts of negligence and breached a personal duty of care owed to Ms. Alfred. In Point II, Ms. Alfred argues the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Mr. Lato because he failed to properly allege sufficient uncontroverted material facts to demonstrate he was entitled to summary judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 408 

Expressing support for designation of May 16, 2023, as the ‘‘National Day 

of Light’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2023 

Mr. MORELLE (for himself and Mr. MAST) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of May 16, 2023, as 

the ‘‘National Day of Light’’. 

Whereas the National Day of Light is aimed at raising 

awareness of the vital role of light in our daily lives and 

its importance to 21st-century technology and innovation; 

Whereas for centuries, light-based technologies have provided 

solutions to worldwide challenges in energy, agriculture, 

manufacturing, telecommunications, national security, 

and health; 

Whereas optics and photonics is the study of the fundamental 

properties of light and harnessing them for practical applications; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 408 IH 

Whereas light has revolutionized medicine through technologies such as x-ray imaging, laser surgery, and cancer 

treatments; 

Whereas light has transformed communication via the internet, a tool we cannot imagine living without today; 

Whereas light has helped us improve transportation safety 

with sensors in vehicles and advanced infrastructure 

monitoring; 

Whereas light has greatly enhanced the ability of the United 

States to gather intelligence, defend the Nation, and protect its troops in the field; 

Whereas most of what we have observed in the universe is 

known only through light-based technologies, first from 

the visible wavelengths observed by Galileo into x-ray, infrared, and radio waves, and even gravitational waves detected by lasers; 

Whereas advanced manufacturing is possible due to lightbased technologies that can provide custom, precise, and 

high-added value through means such as additive manufacturing; 

Whereas quantum computing, sensing, and communication 

systems are largely enabled by light-based technologies; 

Whereas through the National Quantum Initiative Act (Public Law 115–368), the United States is accelerating our 

investment in quantum information science and the development of commercially available quantum-based technologies, thereby facilitating growth in the economy of 

the United States and protecting our national security; 

and 

Whereas May 16 is already recognized internationally as the 

Day of Light: Now, therefore, be it 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 408 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

3 Day of Light’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the continuing importance of the 

5 United States as the world leader in light-based 

6 science and technologies; 

7 (3) recognizes the importance of inspiring the 

8 next generation of scientists, researchers, innovators, 

9 technicians, and entrepreneurs; and 

10 (4) encourages schools, community colleges, and 

11 universities to observe the day with appropriate ac12 tivities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2




Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of Keating Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ranjit P. Mankekar, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











/s/ Ranjit P. MankekarName:
Ranjit P. MankekarDate:
March 30, 2010
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5516 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Received 

NOVEMBER 13, 2006 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To allow for the renegotiation of the payment schedule of 

contracts between the Secretary of the Interior and the 

Redwood Valley County Water District, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HR 5516 RFS

1 SECTION 1. RENEGOTIATION OF PAYMENT SCHEDULE. 

2 Section 15 of Public Law 100–516 (102 Stat. 2573) 

3 is amended as follows: 

4 (1) By amending paragraph (2) of subsection 

5 (a) to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(2) If, as of January 1, 2006, the Secretary 

7 of the Interior and the Redwood Valley County 

8 Water District have not renegotiated the schedule of 

9 payment, the District may enter into such additional 

10 non-Federal obligations as are necessary to finance 

11 procurement of dedicated water rights and improve12 ments necessary to store and convey those rights to 

13 provide for the District’s water needs. The renegoti14 ated schedule of payments shall commence when 

15 such additional obligations have been financially sat16 isfied by the District. The date of the initial pay17 ment owed by the District to the United States shall 

18 be regarded as the start of the District’s repayment 

19 period and the time upon which any interest shall 

20 first be computed and assessed under section 5 of 

21 the Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956 (43 

22 U.S.C. 422a et seq.).’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

HR 5516 RFS

1 (2) By striking subsection (c). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
----

----

I Informacja

Komisja

----

PODSUMOWANIE DECYZJI WSPÓLNOTOWYCH W SPRAWIE POZWOLEŃ NA DOPUSZCZENIE DO OBROTU PRODUKTÓW LECZNICZYCH W OKRESIE OD DN. 15.3.2005. DO DN. 15.4.2005

(Decyzje przyjęte na mocy Artykułu 34 dyrektywy 2001/83/WE (1) lub Artykułu 38 dyrektywy 2001/82/WE (2))

(2005/C 118/01)

—   Wydawanie, przedłużanie oraz zmiany krajowych pozwoleń na dopuszczenie do obrotu

----

(1)Dz.U. L 311 z 28.11.2001, str. 67

(2)Dz.U. L 311 z 28.11.2001, str. 1

----

ANEKS I

WYKAZ NAZW, POSTACI FARMACEUTYCZNYCH, DAWEK PRODUKTU LECZNICZEGO, DROGI PODANIA, WYTWÓRCÓW ODPOWIEDZIALNYCH ZA ZWOLNIENIE SERII W PAŃSTWACH CZŁONKOWSKICH

----

ANEKS II

LISTA NAZW, POSTACI FARMACEUTYCZNYCH, MOCY, SPOSOBÓW I DRÓG PODAWANIA, GATUNKÓW ZWIERZĄT, POSIADACZY LICENCJI HANDLOWYCH W PAŃSTWACH CZŁONKOWSKICH, ISLANDII I NORWEGII

----

ANEKS III

WYKAZ NAZW, POSTAĆ FARMACEUTYCZNA, MOC PRODUKTÓW LECZNICZYCH, DROGA PODANIA, WNIOSKODAWCA, POSIADACZ LICENCJI HANDLOWEJ W PAŃSTWACH CZŁONKOWSKICH

----
exh10-12.htm


     

    
      

      

    

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    EXHIBIT
      10.12

     

    CONVERTIBLE
      PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED TO LEE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP

    DATED
      JANUARY 1, 2004


    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    CONVERTIBLE
      PROMISSORY NOTE

    


    $17,775.89                                                                                                                Denver,
      Colorado

                January
      1,
      2004

    


     

                  
      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, PARK-PREMIER MINING COMPANY, a Utah corporation (the
“Maker”), herby promises to pay to the order of Lee Family (the “Holder”), the
      principal sum of Seventeen Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-five and 89/100 US
      Dollars ($17,775.89), together with interest on the unpaid balance at the rate
      of Twelve Percent (12%) per annum, on or before January 1, 2007, subject to
      conversion as described below.  Accrued interest will be added to the
      principal of the note on each annual anniversary date if not paid.

     

                  
      This Note may be converted into shares of Maker’s common stock at the conversion
      price of $.10 per share or such other conversion price as the board of directors
      may deem appropriate, not in excess of $.10 per share, until the due date
      hereof, at the Holder’s option.

    


    This
      Note is subject to prepayment, in
      whole or in part, at the option of the Maker without penalty.  Such
      prepayments shall be applied first to interest accrued and then to the principal
      due hereunder.

    


    In
      case the Note shall not be paid in
      full whenever it shall become due, the Maker agrees to pay all costs and
      expenses of collection including reasonable attorney’s fees, not to exceed 15%
      of the unpaid balance.

     

    All
      rights and obligations hereunder
      shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado.  If any part
      of the assets or capital stock of maker is sold or transferred without Holder’s
      prior written consent, except sales and transfers in the ordinary course of
      business and except transfers by devise, descent or by operation of law upon
      the
      death of a joint tenant:  (1) Holder may, at Holder’s option, declare
      all the sums due under this Note to be immediately due and payable, and (2)
      if
      the sale or transfer involves substantially all of the assets of Maker, the
      transferee shall be deemed to have assumed all of the obligations of Maker
      under
      this Note.

    


    This
      Note is unsecured.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has
      signed his Note effective as of the date first above written.

    


    PARK-PREMIER
      MINING
      COMPANY

    


    By:     /s/
      Robert W. Dunlap

    Its:     President

    Description:  Unreimbursed
      expenses
##### 



EXHIBIT 4.5
 STOCK PLEDGE AGREEMENT
(Capital City)
  RECITALS
     Creation of Security Interest
  Collateral




---



##### 



Companys Obligations
 Payment of Secured Indebtedness
      2




---



##### 



Protection of Security Interest
        3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



Default
  Consequence of Default
  5




---



##### 



Secured Partys Rights and Remedies
  Right to Assign
 Right to Discharge Companys Obligations
 Remedies and Enforcement
    6




---



##### 



Right of Sale
      Miscellaneous
 7




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties of Company
          8




---



##### 



WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL THE BANKS, THE AGENT AND THE COMPANY AFTER CONSULTING OR
HAVING HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH COUNSEL, KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVE
ANY RIGHT ANY OF THEM MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LITIGATION BASED UPON OR ARISING OUT OF
THIS STOCK PLEDGE OR ANY RELATED INSTRUMENT OR AGREEMENT OR ANY OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY
THIS STOCK PLEDGE OR ANY COURSE OF CONDUCT, DEALING, STATEMENTS (WHETHER ORAL OR WRITTEN) OR ACTION
OF ANY OF THEM. NEITHER THE BANKS, THE AGENT, NOR COMPANY SHALL SEEK TO CONSOLIDATE, BY
COUNTERCLAIM OR OTHERWISE, ANY SUCH ACTION IN WHICH A JURY TRIAL HAS BEEN WAIVED WITH ANY OTHER
ACTION IN WHICH A JURY TRIAL CANNOT BE OR HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED. THESE PROVISIONS SHALL NOT BE DEEMED
TO HAVE BEEN MODIFIED IN ANY RESPECT OR RELINQUISHED BY THE BANKS AND THE AGENT OR COMPANY EXCEPT
BY A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY ALL OF THEM.
 9




---



##### 



COMPANY:CAPITAL CITY ACQUISITION CORP., a
Michigan corporationBy:James G. PetcoffIts: PresidentACCEPTED BY SECURED PARTY:COMERICA BANK, as Agent for the BanksBy:Mark A. RafdalIts: Vice President




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A