alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 8 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Portuguese Republic

(Case C-163/05)

(2005/C 132/37)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An action against the Portuguese Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 8 April 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Ramón Vidal Puig, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing the directive into national law expired on 9 March 2004.

----

(1)OJ 2002 L 67, p. 47.

----
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Wayne LEWIS, Appellant.

WD 81151

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: April 30, 2019

Irene C. Karns, Columbia for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Gary D. Witt, Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam

Michael Lewis appeals from his conviction by jury on one count of second-degree burglary. He brings three points on appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, the circuit court's denial of his request for a mistrial based on prosecutorial comments during closing argument, and the court's limitation on *voir dire* questions. For reasons fully explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of BonusAmerica Worldwide Corp
on Form 10-QSB for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Mak, acting in
the capacity of Chief Financial Officer of BonusAmerica Worldwide Corp, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


November 22, 2004                           By: /s/ Michael Mak
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Michael Mak
                                            Chief Financial Officer
---




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Advanced Medical Isotope Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, James C. Katzaroff, Chief Executive Officer and L. Bruce Jolliff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





December 2, 2011





ADVANCED MEDICAL ISOTOPE CORPORATION








By:           /s/ James C. Katzaroff


Name:  James C. Katzaroff


Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Chairman











By:           /s/ L. Bruce Jolliff


Name:  L. Bruce Jolliff


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Alvin D. HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7639

RONALD ANTHONY MANNO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Maryland Attorney General; ROBERT KOPPEL,

Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv00526-AMD)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 27, 2008

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Anthony Manno, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen C. Brockmeyer,

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Anthony Manno seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Manno

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal, and deny

Manno’s motions for appointment of counsel and for summary judgment

of his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

April 8, 2015

Hon. John T. Hubert

District Attorney

700 E. Kleberg, 2nd Floor

P. O. Box 1471

Kingsville, TX 78363

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Jack Pulcher

105th District Court (Kleberg Co.)

P.O. Box 312

Kingsville, TX 78364

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Vincent Gonzalez

Asst. District Attorney

P. O. Box 1471

Kingsville, TX 78364

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Jaime E. Carrillo

Attorney at Law

721 East King Avenue

Kingsville, TX 78363

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Jennifer Whittington

Kleberg County District Clerk

P. O. Box 312

Kingsville, TX 78364

- 0312

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 14

- 00237

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 12

- CRF

- 0137

Style: The State of Texas v. Isaac Sastaita

Enclosed please find copy of an order issued by this Court o n this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Goldland Holdings, Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:



1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2011 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Pierre Quilliam



Pierre Quilliam,

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)



Date:  May 2, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 296 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 296

     Expressing support for the designation of April 13, 2023, as 
                        ``Remanufacturing Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2023

 Ms. Stevens submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing support for the designation of April 13, 2023, as 
                        ``Remanufacturing Day''.

Whereas remanufacturing is a comprehensive and rigorous industrial process by 
        which a previously sold, leased, used, worn, remanufactured, or 
        nonfunctional product or part is returned to a like-new, same-as-when-
        new, or better-than-when-new condition, from both a quality and 
        performance perspective, through a controlled, reproducible, and 
        sustainable process;
Whereas a 2012 United States International Trade Commission (ITC) report found 
        that remanufacturers support at least 180,000 full-time jobs in the 
        United States, and the ITC report states that production of 
        remanufactured goods in the United States increased by 15 percent from 
        2009 to 2011 and exports totaled $11.2 billion annually;
Whereas remanufacturing has been recognized by leading universities, research 
        institutions, and manufacturers in the United States as good for the 
        environment for its ability to divert end-of-life products from 
        landfills;
Whereas, by encouraging businesses, State agencies, nonprofit organizations, 
        schools, and individuals to celebrate ``Remanufacturing Day'' on April 
        13, 2023, we can further promote remanufacturing as environmentally 
        friendly and economically smart; and
Whereas, to focus the attention of the United States on the benefits of 
        remanufacturing, businesses, educational institutions, and nonprofit 
        organizations have joined together to celebrate ``Remanufacturing Day'' 
        and are encouraging their colleagues, friends and families, and their 
        communities to learn more about the benefits of remanufactured products: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``Remanufacturing Day''.
                                 <all>
```
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 10
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 10
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 10
Amendment to stock option agreements



 Exhibit 10.1 
 BEA SYSTEMS, INC. 
 AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS 
 This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the stock options described below (the “Options”), by and between BEA Systems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and Mark Carges (the “Optionee”) is effective as of December 12, 2007. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the plan
document or option agreement related to each Option. 
 WHEREAS, Optionee has been granted the following Options: 
  

	 	•	 	 Award ID Number 000628, dated March 27, 1997, granted under the Company’s 1995 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan, to purchase 48,000 shares for $1.50000 per
share. 


  

	 	•	 	 Award ID Number 001031, dated October 15, 1997, granted under the Company’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, to purchase 32,000 shares for $3.93750 per share;



 WHEREAS, the option agreements pursuant to which the Options were granted do not permit the exercise of the
Options by having a number of shares with an aggregate fair market value equal to the aggregate option exercise price and any statutorily required tax withheld; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Company believes it is in the best interest of the Company to permit the exercise of options by having a number of shares with an aggregate fair market value equal to
aggregate option exercise price and any statutorily required tax withheld; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the parties hereto
hereby agree to amend the stock option agreement for each of the Options to provide that the following sentence will be added to the end of the Method of Payment section: 
 “In addition, the Exercise Price and any statutorily required tax withholding may be paid by withholding a number of otherwise deliverable shares
subject to the Option to be exercised with an aggregate fair market value equal to the aggregate Exercise Price of the Option to be exercised and any statutorily required tax withholding.” 
  

					
	OPTIONEE	 		 	BEA SYSTEMS, INC.
			
	/s/ Mark Carges	 		 	/s/ Robert F. Donohue
	Mark Carges	 		 	Signature
			
		 		 	Robert F. Donohue
		 		 	Print Name
			
		 		 	Vice President
		 		 	Title
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*Brookover *et al.*

Submitted June 9, 1893.

Decided November 4, 1893.

1. Execution'.

An execution issued upon a judgment alter two years from its rendition without an order of court allowing its issuance is properly quashed.

2. Balance of syllabus same as in *State,*v. *Minen, xupra*p. (18 S.

E. Rep. 470).

Okey Johnson for the State filed the same brief as in the preceding case.

Ewing, Melvin ¿Riley, and Jas. *W.*Swing, and John *142Bassell, for defendants in error, filed the same brief as' in the preceding case.

Brannon, J udge:

The Circuit Court of Ohio county quashed an execution in favor of'the state against Brookover and others, and the state obtained .this writ of error. The judgment dates of 22nd of January, 1878, and no execution issued until the one quashed, which dates 23d November, 1891, and it was issued without any order of court allowing it, though more than thirteen years from the date of judgment had passed without execution. Section 10, c 139, Code, required notice and order of court to issue the execution, and for this reason it was rightly quashed. In other respects the same legal principles which control the decision this day made in the case of *State*v. *Mines, supra*p. 124 (18 S. E. Rep. 470) control this case, and lead us to an affirmance of the judgment.
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Ecopetrol S.A. (the “Company”) on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Adriana M. Echeverri, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(i)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/ Adriana M. EcheverriName:  Adriana
      M. EcheverriTitle:  Chief
      Financial Officer


Dated: July
14, 2010




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

________________________ No. ACM 39453

________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Adriel R

. ANDINO D IAZ Senior Airman (E

- 4 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 25 March 2019

________________________ Military Judge: Jefferson B. Brown. Approved sentence: Dishonorable d ischarge , confinement for 24 mo nths , forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to E

- 1 , and a reprimand

. Sentence adjudged 12 February 2018 by GCM convened at Minot Air Force Base, No rth Dakota

. For Appellant: Major Todd M. Swensen , USAF

. For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Captain Peter F. Kellett, USAF; Mary Ellen Payne , Esquire

. Before HUYGEN, MINK , and POSCH , Appellate Military Judges

.

________________________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule o f Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________ PER CURIAM :The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’ s substantial rights occurred. ArticlesUnited States v. Andino Diaz , No. ACM 39453

2 59(a) and 66(c), U niform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866( c) (2016)

. Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 31.2 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

  I, J. Roe Buckley certify that: 

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.       The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting tobe designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:                August 16, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.4


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Leslye Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Leslye Grindle
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Leslye Grindle, Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer


May 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Stuart B. Brown    
|                        |  |  |  | Stuart B. Brown        
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer