alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12
 PRIMUS GUARANTY, LTD
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DISTRIBUTIONS OF SUBSIDIARY
 Six Months Ended
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,June 30, 2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings (loss):Net income (loss) available to common shares
    
    $
    703,736
    
    
    $
    (1,716,146
    )
    
    $
    (563,541
    )
    
    $
    94,891
    
    
    $
    4,083
    
    
    $
    23,685Provision (benefit) for taxes
    
    
    147
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    52
    
    
    
    42
    
    
    
    46
    
    
    
    46Distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    2,014
    
    
    
    6,642
    
    
    
    7,568
    
    
    
    5,683
    
    
    
    3,865
    
    
    
    2,138Income (loss) from continuing operations before
taxes (a)
    
    
    705,897
    
    
    
    (1,709,443
    )
    
    
    (555,921
    )
    
    
    100,616
    
    
    
    7,994
    
    
    
    25,869Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    7,082
    
    
    
    23,674
    
    
    
    28,297
    
    
    
    16,532
    
    
    
    6,525
    
    
    
    3,019Subtract:Distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    (2,014
    )
    
    
    (6,642
    )
    
    
    (7,568
    )
    
    
    (5,683
    )
    
    
    (3,865
    )
    
    
    (2,138
    )Adjusted earnings (loss)
    
    $
    710,965
    
    
    $
    (1,692,411
    )
    
    $
    (535,192
    )
    
    $
    111,465
    
    
    $
    10,654
    
    
    $
    26,750Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    5,068
    
    
    
    17,032
    
    
    
    20,729
    
    
    
    10,849
    
    
    
    2,660
    
    
    
    881Distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    2,014
    
    
    
    6,642
    
    
    
    7,568
    
    
    
    5,683
    
    
    
    3,865
    
    
    
    2,138Total fixed charges and preferred distributions
    
    $
    7,082
    
    
    $
    23,674
    
    
    $
    28,297
    
    
    $
    16,532
    
    
    $
    6,525
    
    
    $
    3,019Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
distributions on preferred securities of
subsidiary (b)
    
    
    100.39
    
    
    
    (71.49
    )
    
    
    (18.91
    )
    
    
    6.74
    
    
    
    1.63
    
    
    
    8.86
 (a)
    
    Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes represents income (loss) before income taxes plus adding back distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary.(b)
    
    Due to the losses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. Additional earnings of approximately $1.7 billion and $563.5 million for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, would be needed to achieve the coverage ratio of 1:1.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1276

MOUSSA KOUROUMA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A97-938-199)

Submitted: November 3, 2006 Decided: November 14, 2006

Before WILLIAMS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kell Enow, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW & PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland,

for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen

F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Moussa Kourouma, a native and citizen of Guinea,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s

denial of his motion to reopen. 

A denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of

discretion. INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). A denial

of a motion to reopen must be reviewed with extreme deference,

since immigration statutes do not contemplate reopening and the

applicable regulations disfavor motions to reopen. MA v. INSA, 899

F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc).

The Board ruled that Kourouma did not establish that

exceptional circumstances prevented him from appearing before the

immigration judge for a scheduled proceeding. We have reviewed the

evidence of record and conclude that Kourouma fails to show that

the Board abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition

for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 25, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |        |  |                                   
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: November 2, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/ JoAnn A. Reed                 
|                       |  | Name:  |  | JoAnn A. Reed                     
|                       |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and
|                       |  |        |  | Chief Financial Officer           



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

August 30, 2024 CR-2023-0850 Eric Ray Gaylord v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court: CC-22- 2994) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on August 30, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
Exhibit 21.1

Essent Group Ltd.

List of Subsidiaries

Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation/FormationEssent Reinsurance Ltd.

BermudaEssent US Holdings, Inc.

DelawareEssent Guaranty of PA, Inc.(1)

PennsylvaniaCUW Solutions, LLC(2)

DelawareEssent Guaranty, Inc.(3)

PennsylvaniaEssent Solutions, LLC(4)

Delaware


(1)100%
of common shares held by Essent US Holdings Inc.(2)100%
of common shares held by Essent US Holdings Inc.(3)100%
of common shares held by Essent US Holdings Inc.(4)100%
of common shares held by Essent Guaranty, Inc.


---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241, AS ADOPTED 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

I, Michael A. Gerlich, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the “Registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 12, 2006
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Michael D. Price, President and Chief Executive Officer of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
 
 
 
 Date: July 28, 2009
/s/  Michael D. PriceBy: Michael D. PricePresident and Chief Executive Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 207 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members, 

officers, and employees of the House from serving on the board of 

directors of any entity which receives funding from, or is affiliated 

with or owned or controlled by, the United Front Work Department 

of the Chinese Communist Party, any other element of the Chinese 

Communist Party, or any foreign adversary, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Mr. LUTTRELL (for himself, Mr. HERN, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mrs. 

MILLER of Illinois, Mrs. BOEBERT, Mr. GOODEN of Texas, and Mr. 

ELLZEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit Members, officers, and employees of the House 

from serving on the board of directors of any entity 

which receives funding from, or is affiliated with or 

owned or controlled by, the United Front Work Department of the Chinese Communist Party, any other element of the Chinese Communist Party, or any foreign 

adversary, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 207 IH 

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING SERVICE ON BOARDS AFFILI2 ATED WITH CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY OR 

3 FOREIGN ADVERSARIES. 

4 Clause 2 of rule XXV of the Rules of the House of 

5 Representatives is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

7 (d); 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of para9 graph (e) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(f) serve— 

13 ‘‘(1) on the board of directors of any entity 

14 which receives funding from, or is affiliated 

15 with or owned or controlled by, the United 

16 Front Work Department of the Chinese Com17 munist Party, any other element of the Chinese 

18 Communist Party, or any government or person 

19 determined by the Secretary of State to be a 

20 foreign adversary under section 7.4 of title 15, 

21 Code of Federal Regulations as of March 1, 

22 2023; or 

23 ‘‘(2) on any board of directors whose mem24 bers include any member or agent of the United 

25 Front Work Department of the Chinese Com26 munist Party, any other element of the Chinese 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 207 IH 

1 Communist Party, or any government or person 

2 determined by the Secretary of State to be a 

3 foreign adversary under section 7.4 of title 15, 

4 Code of Federal Regulations as of March 1, 

5 2023.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

POP TOP CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RAKUTEN KOBO INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2021-2174

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 4:20-cv-04482-DMR, 

Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MATTHEW MICHAEL WAWRZYN, Wawrzyn LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

 JOSHUA LEE RASKIN, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New 

York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented 

by JUSTIN ALBANO MACLEAN. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 21-2174 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 05/04/2022
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and 

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

May 4, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2174 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 05/04/2022
Antron TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106923

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: March 12, 2019

Ryan Fanning, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr. J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Antron Taylor ("Taylor") appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking post-conviction relief. Taylor pleaded guilty to a Class C felony of stealing in violation of Section 570.030. Taylor argues appeal that, pursuant to *State v. Bazell*, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), his sentence should have been based on a class A misdemeanor, not a class C felony. Because *Bazell* does not apply retroactively to Taylor's plea and sentencing, we affirm the motion court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
o 

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Admlnlstfotion 

OCT i 1 201) 

, L. I 1 I W I 

iJTATin 

L:r 

-"1 

Air Traffic Organization 

Technical Operation Services 

Aviation System Standards 

Peter W Gretsch 

Director of Operations 

PO Box 25082 

Oklahoma City, OK 73125 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, IVI-30 

West Building groud tloor, 

Room WI2-I40 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Request for Extension of Exemption No. 5118, Regulatory Docket # FAA-2001-9128. 

Dear Sirs: 

FAA Aviation System Standards, Operating Certificate # RU3A796LJ, requests that it be 

granted an extension of exemption No. 5118, as amended. Exemption from 91.119 (b) and (c), 

91.159. 91.175 (a) and (b), 91.179, 91.515 (a)(1) and (a) (2) of title 14 CFR that permits FAA 

Flight Inspection aircraft to deviate from specific flight rules required by subpart B of part 91 

while conducting flight checks of air navigation facilities and instrument approach procedures. 

There have been no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety 

that were the basis for granting the original exemption. We believe continued operation under 

the provisions of the exemption would be in the public interest. 

Additionally, we request that the exemption period be granted for a period of at least three 

years, or longer if permitted. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Peter W. Gretsch 

Director of Operations 

Aviation System Standards 

Email: Petcr.W.Gretsch@faa.gov
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRIC T 

## C OURT O F 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_ ____________________________ Case N o. 5 D 23- 0 162 LT Case N o. 16

- 2019

- CF

- 009351

_ _ ______________________ _____ A MANDA B ETH B UTLER , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________
On a ppeal from the Circuit Court f or Duval County

. London M

. K ite, J udge

. Je ssica J. Y eary , P ublic D efender, a nd Ross S. Haine , II , Special Assistant P ublic D e fender, Tallahassee , f or A ppe llant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G e neral, an d Kristie Regan , Assistant Attorney G eneral, Tallahassee , f or Appe llee. April 9, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED
. W ALLIS , L AMBERT , and E ISNAUGLE , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Sherry RADACK

ChiefJustice

Terry Jennings

Evelyn Keyes

Laura Carter Higley

Jane Bland

Michael Massengai.e

Harvey Brown

Rebeca Huddle

Russell Lloyd

Justices

Freddie Lee Walker

TDCJ M00457485

Ellis Unit

1697 FM 1980

Huntsville.TX 77343

Court of Appeals

First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

June 9, 2015

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-15-00361-CV

Trial Court Case Number: D-1 -GN-14-001926

Christopher A. Prine

Clerk ofthe Court

Janet Williams

Chief Staff Attorney

Phone: 713-274-2700

Fax: 713-755-8131

WWW.lslcoa.conrls.slalc.lv.us

FILED IN

1ST COURT OF APPEALS

HOFJSTON, TEXAS

JUNr« 2015

CHRISTOPHER a\pRINE

CLERK.

F'LED IN

'SrCOURTOFAPPe^c; H0^TOW. TEXAS

JUN 17 2Qt5

Style: Freddie Lee Walker v. Rissie Owens et al.

We arc forwarding the following via Lone Star Overnight (air bill tracking §

9362955756):

3. 2 Civil Docketing Statements

4. September 2, 2014 Reporter's Record (Hearing on Motion for Protective Order)

Please sign the attached copy and return to show receipt.

Sincerely,

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk ofthe Court

By Cheryl Roberts, Deputy Clerk

RETURN RECEIPT

Received by^jmAAib Jt&g. nxlalRsA Date Received JjpjTVl. II, Qo\5
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 184 (Thursday, September 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58853-58854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24512]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7608]

In the Matter of the Designation of Muhammad Hisham Muhammad 
Isma'il Abu Ghazala, Also Known as Muhammad Hisham Isma'il Abu-
Ghazalah, Also Known as Muhammad Hisham Muhammad Abu-Ghazalah, Also 
Known as Abu Ghazala, Also Known as Abu Ghazaleh, Also Known as Mansur 
Abu Layth, Also Known as Abu Layth al-Filistini, Also Known as 'Ali 
'Abd Al-Rahman Isma'il, Also Known as 'Ali 'Abd Al-Rahman Abu Suwaywin, 
as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Muhammad Hisham 
Muhammad Isma'il Abu Ghazala, also known as Muhammad Hisham Isma'il 
Abu-Ghazalah, also known as Muhammad Hisham Muhammad Abu-Ghazalah, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render

[[Page 58854]]

ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 16, 2011.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-24512 Filed 9-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```