alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Offer Letter with Richard Scannell



 Exhibit 10.14 
 June 18, 2001 
 Richard Scannell 
 65 Pelham
Island Road 
 Sudbury, MA 01776 
 Dear Richard: 
 Glass House Technologies, Inc. (“Glass House”) is pleased to offer you a position as part of our start up venture planned for July 2001 launch. Your position
would be Vice President of Corporate Development. You will report directly to the CEO of GlassHouse Mark Shirman, and your focus would initially be the following: 
  

	 	•	 	 Develop “productization” of intellectual property 


  

	 	•	 	 Assist in all sales efforts 


  

	 	•	 	 Help craft go to market messages and strategy 


  

	 	•	 	 Assist in customer delivery engagements 


  

	 	•	 	 Additional tasks to that may be assigned by CEO 


 Your compensation will initially be $150,000 with an opportunity to earn an additional 25% bonus, based upon attainment of company business goals, and individual objectives. These objectives will be agreed upon between you and the CEO of
Glass House and be subject to the approval of the Board of Directors. Additionally you will be granted 2% of the common stock of Glass House as a founder and 1% from the Company option pool. These grants will be subject to vesting conditions
consistent with your peers within the organization and those laid out in the company Stockholder Agreement and 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. 
 This agreement
is subject to the following conditions: 
  

	 	•	 	 Successful closing of seed round of financing of at least $1,500,000 


  

	 	•	 	 Your execution of the following agreements: 


  

	 	•	 	 Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement 


  

	 	•	 	 Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreements 


  

	 	•	 	 Any additional terms and conditions that may be dictated to officers per investors in this seed round 


  

	
	Sincerely yours,
	
	 /s/ Mark Shirman

	Mark Shirman
	CEO
	Glass House Technologies, Inc.

 Please indicate your acceptance of the terms of this letter by countersigning below: 
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO: 
  

	
	 /s/ Richard Scannell

	Richard Scannell
RENEWABLE
      ENERGY ACQUISITION CORP.

    7078
      East Fish Lake Road, Suite 800

    Minneapolis,
      Minnesota 55311

    (952)
      541-1155

    


    


    September
      30, 2007

    


    


    SRC
      Funding, Inc.

    7078
      East
      Fish Lake Road, Suite 800

    Minneapolis,
      Minnesota 55311 

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm the agreement by and among Renewable Energy Acquisition
      Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and SRC Funding, Inc., a Minnesota
      corporation (“SRC”) that, commencing on the closing date (“Closing Date”) of the
      initial public offering (“IPO”) of the Company’s securities and continuing until
      the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of a “Business Combination,”
or (ii) the Company’s liquidation as described in the Company’s definitive
      prospectus relating to the IPO (hereinafter, the earlier of such dates is
      referred to as the “Termination Date”), SRC shall make available to the Company
      certain office space, administrative services and secretarial services as may
      be
      required by the Company from time to time, at SRC’s primary offices situated at
      7078 East Fish Lake Road, Suite 800, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55311, or at such
      successor facilities as shall be suitable to meet the Company’s needs and as SRC
      may elect to provide in lieu of the foregoing offices. In exchange therefore,
      the Company shall pay SRC a combined sum of $1,500 per month on the Closing
      Date
      and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. 

    


    
      	 	
              Very
                truly yours,

            
	 	 
	 	
              Renewable
                Energy Acquisition Corp.

            
	 	 
	 	
              /s/

            
	 	 
	 	
              Craig
                Laughlin, President

            


    

    


    Agreed
      and accepted by:

    


    SRC
      Funding, Inc.

    


    /s/

    


    Craig
      Laughlin, President
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of


Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Asia Global Holdings Cor., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Asia Global Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Asia Global Holdings Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




Date:
      April 23, 2009
                      /s/
      John LeperJohn
      Leper, Chief Executive
Officer
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  Amendment  No.1  to  the  Annual Report on  Form  10-K  of
Elevated Concepts, Inc. on Form 10-K/A(the"Company")for the year ended September
30,2008, as filed  with  the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to her knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  May 22, 2009

                                      /s/ Nadezda Bulicheva
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Nadezda Bulicheva
                                      Secretary, Treasurer, C.F.O. and Director
                                     (Principal Financial Officer and
                                      Principal Accounting Officer)
[No. 52615-4-I.

Division One.

June 1, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Matthew Anderson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-07412-6, Richard A. Jones, J., entered May 12, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation
(the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that, to his
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 6, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    PHILIP L.
HAWKINS             
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Philip L Hawkins                     
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Doyle D. EDWARDS, Appellant.

ED 106771

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, SOUTHERN DIVISION.

Filed: April 30, 2019

Michael L. Jackson, Law Offices of Michael L. Jackson, LC, 1028 N. Kingshighway, Suite 1, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, for appellant.

Justin A. Moody, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Doyle D. Edwards ("Defendant") appeals the trial court's judgment following a bench trial convicting him of one count of second-degree domestic assault pursuant to Section 565.073 RSMo (2016). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *761error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61768-61769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28191]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3391-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]


Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-3391-EM), dated September 18, 
2017, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued December 6, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective November 15, 2017.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

[[Page 61769]]

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-28191 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Steven C. RENDLEMAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 106661

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Signed April 16, 2019

Ellen H. Flottmann, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Robin Ransom, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Steven C. Rendleman appeals the motion court's judgment dismissing his motions filed under Rule 24.035 and Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

Mo. R. Crim. P. 2016.
Deron WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3025

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**     Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of North PointeHoldings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                         /s/  James G. Petcoff   James G. Petcoff   Chief Executive Officer   Dated: November 14, 2005
March 8, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KRISTIN MCKAMEY, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00321-CV V.

ANTHONY D. HICKS, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on March 9, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it 

meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

KRISTIN MCKAMEY.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00223

- CV
Stacey Renae Hammer

v. Lea C. Noelke, Judith E. Bryant, and Noelke, English, Maples, St. Leger, Blair, LLP

On a ppeal from the 250th District Court of Travis County , Texas Trial Cause No. D

- 1

- GN

- 14

- 00217 7

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgm ent of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged fifty percent against appellant and fifty percent against

a ppel l ee s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. November 29 , 2018
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7126
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WALTER LEE SADLER, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 96-7674
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WALTER LEE SADLER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-134-V) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 19972 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Lee Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Walter Lee Sadler appeals from the district court's orders denying his motions for (1) disclosure of grand jury materials or alternatively production of grand jury transcripts at Government expense for in camera consideration; (2) disqualification of the district court judge on the issue of production; (3) correction of his criminal docket sheet; and (4) bail pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sadler , No. CR-95-134-V (W.D.N.C. June 26, 1996; Oct. 17, 1996). We also deny Sadler's renewed motionfor bail pending appeal because Sadler has failed to meet his burden of proving that his appeal raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in reversal, a new trial, or a sentence of no or reduced imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (1994); United States v. Steinhorn , 927 F.2d 195 (4th Cir. 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Anthony RIEMENSCHNEIDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4534

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[No. 51376-1-I.

Division One.

June 1, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Edward Earl Grant, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-01585-5, Catherine D. Shaffer, J., entered October 11, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
I, William C. Kurtz, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MonarchCommunity Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have;
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 12, 2004 By:  /s/ William C. Kurtz       William C. KurtzSenior Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this Annual Report of Amerilithium Corp. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Matthew Worrall, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|  

 

 

 

Date: July 30, 2012

By: 

*/s/ Matthew Worrall*

 

 

 

Matthew Worrall

 

 

 

Principal Financial Officer

Amerilithium Corp.

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
George MILLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2099

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.