alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Eria DOSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81454

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 16, 2019

Steven Willibey, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Eria Doss appeals a Jackson County Circuit Court judgment denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion following a hearing. He is currently serving an aggregate 79-year term of imprisonment. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7918** 

GREGORY S. HINES , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA; HAROLD W. CLARKE, VADOC, Director; EBP ISRAEL HAMILTON, Re

- Entry Institutional Program Manager; JEFFERY ARTRIP, Unit Manager D. Bldg; TORI RAIFORD, Counselor , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Jackson L. Kiser , Senior District Judge. ( 7:13

- cv - 00288

- JLK

- RSB )

Submitted : April 3, 2014 Decided: July 10, 2014

Before DUNCAN and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Gregory S. Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory S. Hines appeals the district court ’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) compla int. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Hines v. Mathena , No. 7:13

- cv - 00288

- JLK

- RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Conference Grants (R13's).                    

*Date:*                         March 31-April 1, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         David A Wilson, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7204, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0299,                         *wilsonda2@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 16, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-6207 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Charles A. Fust, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Russell R. Lee III,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles A. Fust
--------------------------------
Charles A. Fust
Chief Executive Officer
October 29, 2004


/s/ Russell R. Lee III
--------------------------------
Russell R. Lee III
Chief Financial Officer
October 29, 2004

                                       19
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, James A. Krantz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
 
 
 
 Date: July 28, 2009
/s/  James A. KrantzBy: James A. KrantzExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**FORM 10-QSB**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

# **Quarter ended September 30, 2005**

 

I, Thomas E. Fox, President anChief Financial Officer of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”)certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB of the Company for the third quarter ended September 30, 2005(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The information inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operation of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 14, 2005 |   |   |   |                     |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|                      |   |   |   |                     |
|                      |   |   |   | /s/ Thomas  E. Fox       |
|                      |   |   |   | Thomas E.  Fox           |
|                      |   |   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
A. W., Father of B. W., Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3006

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



JOINT CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL

FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(B)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protocall Technologies Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bruce Newman, Chief Executive Officer, and  Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



May 16, 2008





/s/      Bruce Newman

-----------------------------------------------

Bruce Newman

Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,539]


Lexis Nexis, San Francisco, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a State Workforce officer on behalf of all workers at 
Lexis Nexis, San Francisco, California.
    The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6544 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60085

ENRIQUE A. GARCIA, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A43-787-893

-------------------- March 7, 2002 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Enrique A. Garcia petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Garcia’s state conviction for felony driving while intoxicated was an aggravated felony warranting his removal from this country. The respondent has moved to dismiss the petition for review and to remand the case to the BIA for reconsideration in light of United States v. Chapa-Garza , 243 F.3d 921, 927 (5th Cir. 2001). Garcia has not replied to the respondent’s motion to remand.No. 01-60085 -2- Garcia’s petition for review is GRANTED. The order of the BIA is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the BIA for disposition consistent with Chapa-Garza , 243 F.3d at 927. All other outstanding motions are DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Fuer International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certifies, in accordance with 18





U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Yu HaifeiYu Haifei

Chief Financial Officer





Date: March 31, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fuer International, Inc. and will be retained by Fuer International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Lorenzo D. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81354

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 30, 2019

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Justin Moody, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Two: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Lorenzo D. Washington ("Washington") appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to provide Washington with sufficient information to knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter into a guilty plea. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service Board of Governors

# Times and Dates: 

6 p.m., Monday, March 30, 2009; 10 a.m., Tuesday, March 31, 2009; and 9:45 a.m., Wednesday, April 1, 2009.

# Place: 

Potomac, Maryland, at the Bolger Center for Leadership Development.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

## Monday, March 30 at 6 p.m. (Closed)

1. Financial Matters.

2. Strategic Issues.

3. Pricing.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

## Tuesday, March 31 at 10 a.m. (Closed)

Continuation of Monday's agenda.

## Wednesday, April 1 at 9:45 a.m. (Closed)

Continuation of Monday's agenda.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-6333 Filed 3-18-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Walter Reid Green, Jr., as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green, Jr.Walter Reid Green, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate:  May 23, 2011








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WAS HIN GTON , D
.C
. 20460 

### MAY 1 0 012

OFFICE OF POUCY
Dr. James Johnson , Chair National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Dear Dr. Johnson , On behalf ofAdministrator Lisa Jackson, I would like to thank you for your April 5, 2012, letter supporting EPA's adoption ofthe National Academy of Sciences' recommendations in its 

### Sustainability and the US. EPA report, that EPA more fully incorporate sustainability considerations into its decision-making processes and day-to-day operations. Your letter is thoughtful and articulate and will be useful to us as we consider whether and how to adopt the particular recommendations. As you know, EPA also hasjust concluded a broad stakeholder listening process to get further input on this topic. Incorporating sustainability into the work of EPA will be an ongoing process. We look forward to receiving additional advice from NACEPT on the topic of sustainability, as was described in your letter. We really appreciate the opportunity to wo rk with you on these issues. Sincerely,

Bernice I. Corman Deputy Associate Administrator

cc: Mark Joyce, NACEPT DFO

I nternet Address (U RL) · htt p /lwww epa gov Re cycl ed/ Recyc lable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION**


Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the
      Quarter ended May 31, 2006 (the “Report”) by PaperFree Medical Solutions, Inc.,
      the undersigned hereby certifies that:




1.
      The
      Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




By: /s/
      William L Sklar


Chief
      Financial Officer




Date:
                August 22, 2006
# FILED
August 21, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON JULY 1998 SESSION

DERRICK K. GARRIN, ) NO. 02C01-9707-CR-00272 ) Appellant, ) SHELBY COUNTY No. P-17200 ) VS. ) HON. JOSEPH B. DAILEY, ) JUDGE STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) AFFIRMED -

RULE 20 Appellee. )
ORDER
This is a post-convict ion matter. The petitioner w as originally con

victed by a jury of two (2) c

ounts of felony murder and two ( 2) counts of attempted second degree murder. He recei ved an effective sentence of life impr isonment plus twenty-one (21) y

ears. This court subsequently affirmed those convict ions. State v. Derrick K. Garrin , C.C.A. No. 02C01-9501-C R-00028, Shelby County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed May 24, 1996, at Jackson). The petitioner complains that he w as deprived of effective assi stance of counsel at both the trial and appellate levels. The petit ioner alleges counsel w as deficient for: (1) failing to effectively cross-ex

amine a state’s witness, (2) failing to call certain witnesses, and (3) failing to present mitigating evidence at his sentencing hearing. F urther, petitioner complai ns appellate counsel failed to properly challenge the “moral certainty” jury charge, and the post-conviction court committed plain error w hen it refused to provide hi m with a portion of the tri al transcript during the post-conviction hearing in order to contest a “dynamite” jury charge. With regard to the ineffective assistanc e of counsel claim, we find the petitioner fails to present ev en a colorable claim of deficient representation. The trial court found the petitioner received “outstanding

representation.” The evidence does not preponderate otherwise.2 Any alleged error r

egarding the “moral ce rtainty” jury c harge was waiv

ed by the fa ilure to p resent it on direct appeal. Furtherm ore, the “moral ce rtainty” jury charge was

proper. See Carter v. State , 958 S.W.2d 620, 62 6 (Tenn. 1997). Likewise, any all eged error regardin g a “dynamite” jury charge was wai

ved by the failure to present it on direct appeal. Further, this allegation is n ot set forth in the petition or amended petition; thu s, the post-conviction court properly refused to consider it. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-210(c). After thoroughly rev

iewing the record, the briefs, and the law gov erning the issues presented by the petitioner, we conclud e the evidence does not preponderate against the findings of the trial court that the pe titioner received effective assistance of counsel. Further, no error of law requiring a rev

ersal of judgment is apparent. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tenn essee Court of Criminal Appeals, we affirm the judgment of the trial court . Costs are taxed to the state as the appellant is i ndigent.

All of which is so ord ered.

_________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

_________________________ CURWOOD WITT, JUDGE

_________________________ ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, SPECIAL JUDG E