alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Link Media Publishing Ltd. (the "Company") on
  10Q SB for the period ending August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Earl Hope,
  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
  to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|1 | . | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
|- | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  |   |                                                                                                                                                                    
|2 | . | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        result of operations of the Company.



Date: October 14, 2003.



/s/ Earl Hope   Chief Executive Officer 
    (Title)


---
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing humane trapping standards for certain animal species’

(COM(2004) 532 final — 2004/0183(COD))

(2005/C 157/11)

On 14 September 2004, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 175 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

The Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 16 November 2004. The rapporteur was Mr Donnelly.

At its 413th plenary session of 15 and 16 December 2004 (meeting of 16 December), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 60 votes to one, with 6 abstentions.

I.   Introduction

1.   The leg-hold trap regulation

2.   The Agreement

3.   Gist of the Commission Proposal

II.   Comments

4.   The use of the term ‘humane trapping standards’

5.   Traps

6.   Testing

7.   Derogations

8.   Trappers

9.   Certification

10.   Sanctions

11.   Conclusions

Brussels, 16 December 2004.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)  Council Regulation 3254/91, OJ L 308, 9/11/1991

(2)  Opinion on the proposal for a Council Regulation on the importation of certain furs, OJ C 168 of 10.7.1990, page 32

(3)  COM(2004) 532 final

(4)  In February 1994 the Working Committee established under ISO (International Standardization Organization) to discuss humane trapping standards, decided to remove the word ‘humane’ from the title of the standards. At this meeting it was agreed to remove all references to ‘humane’ or ‘humaneness’. An agreement on trapping standards could not be reached under ISO. During ISO negotiations, European vets highlighted that anything longer that 15 seconds to kill an animal is not to be defined as humane killing and clearly no submersion traps could be considered. These points, among others, have not been considered when drafting the final text of the Agreement.

The Opinion of the Scientific Veterinary Committee of the European Commission (1994) concluded that to be considered ‘humane’ a killing trap should render the animal insensible to pain instantaneously, and that more attention should be paid also to the design of traps, in order to take account of the behaviour of non-target species, to avoid their capture or injury. The Committee concluded that the proposed injury scale, having no scientific basis, is unacceptable as a measure of humaneness.

(5)  Opinion from the Scientific Committee established under CITES regulation, 1995; Scientific Committee Opinion, DG Agriculture, 1994.

----
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kendrick Lamarr TIPLER, Appellant.

No. ED 106235

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: April 30, 2019

Katharine Patricia Curry, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick Lamarr Tipler appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of one count of first-degree child molestation following a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).
Form of restricted stock grant letter




 Exhibit 10(iii)(f.3) 
  

					
	 Exxon Mobil Corporation
	  		  	David S. Rosenthal
	 5959 Las Colinas Boulevard
	  		  	Vice President, Investor Relations
	 Irving, TX 75039
	  		  	and Secretary
			
		  		  	ExxonMobil

 January 4, 2010 
 [Name of Non-employee Director] 
 I am pleased to
inform you that on January 4, 2010, you were granted 2,500 shares of restricted stock under Exxon Mobil Corporation’s 2004 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”) and in accordance with the Board’s standing
resolution regarding grants under the Plan. This letter summarizes key terms of your award and is qualified by reference to the Plan. You should refer to the text of the Plan for a detailed description of the terms and conditions of your award.
Copies of the Plan have been previously distributed to you and are also available on request to me at any time. 
 The restricted stock has been
registered in your name and will be held in book-entry form by the Corporation’s agent during the restricted period. As the owner of record, you have the right to vote the shares and receive cash dividends. However, during the restricted period
the shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise disposed of or encumbered, and your restricted stock account will be subject to stop transfer instructions. 
 The restricted period for this award began at the time of grant. The restricted period will expire when you leave the Board after reaching retirement age (currently, age 72) or by reason of death. If you
leave the Board before reaching retirement age, your restricted stock will be forfeited unless the Board determines to lift the restrictions at that time. 
 If and when the restricted period expires, shares will be delivered to or for your account free of restrictions. 
 You are entitled to designate a beneficiary for your restricted stock account. Please contact Jerry Miller at (972) 444-4004 for the necessary form should you wish to do so. 
 By accepting this award you agree to all its terms and conditions, including the restrictions on transfer and events of forfeiture. 
 Additional information concerning your award, including information on the tax consequences of your award and certain additional information required by the
Securities Act of 1933, is also enclosed with this letter. 
 Any questions that you may have concerning the Plan or this award should be
addressed to me. 
  

	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 (D. S. Rosenthal)



 Enclosures
EXHIBIT 32





OCTAGON 88 RESOURCES, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Octagon 88 Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip Thomann, as Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  October 13, 2011
By:
/s/ Philip ThomannName:
Philip ThomannTitle:
Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Kevin WARD, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

WD 81402

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 30, 2019

Kevin Ward, Jefferson City, MO, Appellant, pro se.

Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Andrew J. Crane, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges *168**Order**

Per Curiam:

Kevin Ward appeals the grant of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole's motion for judgment on the pleadings in his declaratory judgment action. Ward argues that the trial court misapplied the law in entering judgment in the Board's favor. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Linda FORD, Appellant, v. PAUWELS TRANSFORMERS and Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondents.

No. ED 107317

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: May 7, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Jeffrey P. Gault, 222 South Central Avenue, Suite 808, Clayton, MO 63105.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Brad L. McChesney, 10733 Sunset Office Drive, Suite 410, St. Louis, MO 63127, Caroline M. Bean, 815 Olive Street, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO 63101.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Linda Ford appeals from two separate final awards of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Division of Workers' Compensation and awarding Appellant permanent partial disability benefits and denying future medical treatment from Pauwels Transformers in one case while awarding permanent partial disability benefits but denying permanent total disability benefits *341from the Second Injury Fund in the second case. Finding no error, we affirm.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of the NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held June 9, 2009 starting at 1 a.m. to 4 p.m. Arrive in FAA Lobby at 12:30 p.m. for visitor check in.

# ADDRESSES:

FAA Auditorium, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-9434; Web site                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force meeting. The agenda will include:
    - Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions);
    - Work Group and Subgroup Status Reports and Planned Activities;
    - Discussion and Next Steps;
    - Closing Plenary (Other Business, Document Production, Date and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn).

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 13, 2009.

Francisco Estrada C.,

RTCA Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. E9-6172 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION**
   Certification
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
        connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
        Quarter ended August 31, 2006 (the “Report”) by PaperFree Medical Solutions,
        Inc., the undersigned hereby certifies that:
  1.
        The
        Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section
        13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.
   By: /s/
        Stephen Hawksworth
 Date:
        January 16,
        2007
 Chief
        Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carroll Shelby International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carroll Shelby, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: November 14, 2003 |  | /s/CARROLL SHELBYCarroll Shelby, Director
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 562 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.562

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
   To authorize the Government of Ukraine to establish a memorial on 
  Federal land in the District of Columbia to honor the victims of the 
          manmade famine that occurred in Ukraine in 1932-1933.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.
    (a) In General.--The Government of Ukraine is authorized to 
establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 
honor the victims of the Ukrainian famine-genocide of 1932-1933.
    (b) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The 
establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance with chapter 89 of 
title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the ``Commemorative 
Works Act''), except that sections 8902(a)(1), 8906(b)(1), 8908(b)(2), 
and 8909(b) shall not apply with respect to the memorial.
SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.
    The United States Government shall not pay any expense for the 
establishment of the memorial or its maintenance.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 00-30867

____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDWARD JOHN FLUNKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CR-75-1-N

August 13, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Loc. R. 47.6.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,157]


Alcoa, Inc., Alcoa, TN; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on February 6, 2009 in response 
to a petition filed by a Tennessee AFL-CIO Technical Assistance Program 
representative on behalf of workers of Alcoa, Inc., Alcoa, Tennessee.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6527 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Rebekah Lynn NIERE, Respondent, v. Alexander Albert NIERE, Appellant.

No. ED 106796

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: June 11, 2019

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Cherlyn Marie Crosby-Herberts, 1843 Sherman Drive, St. Charles, MO 63303, CROSBY LAW, LLC.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Jane Ellen Tomich, 309 N. Main Street, Suite 210, St. Charles, MO 63301, TOMICH LAW FIRM, LLC.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Alexander Albert Niere appeals from the trial court's Judgment and Order ("Judgment") dismissing his Motion to Modify Judgment and Decree of Dissolution, which had sought a revised child custody schedule and a decrease in his child support obligation. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[No. 51516-1-I.

Division One.

April 19, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Devin Jennings, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-1-11165-3, Michael Hayden, J., entered June 5, 2001. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**Exhibit 31.1**
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
I, Peter A. Edison, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q/A of Bakers FootwearGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b) [reserved]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.      March 21, 2005  /s/ Peter A. Edison  Peter A. Edison   Chairman of the Board andChief Executive OfficerBakers Footwear Group, Inc.(Principal Executive Officer)