alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRODOS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
LLC

    


    March 3,
2010

    


    Dr. Craig
A. Zabala

    President
and Chief Executive Officer

    Blackhawk
Capital Group BDC, Inc.

    880 Third
Avenue, 12th
Floor

    New York,
New York 10022

    


    Dear
Craig:

    


    As
discussed, this letter outlines the compensation due to you or an affiliate of
yours for the introduction of a Transaction ("Finder's Fee") to Prodos Capital
Management LLC ("PCM"). Transaction is defined as any buyout, financing,
investment or M&A transaction where PCM acts as a principal or
advisor.

     

    The
Finder's Fee for introducing the Transaction to PCM is comprised of cash
compensation equal to 50% of the cash Transaction Fee (maximum of $1,000,000 to
Blackhawk Capital Group) received by PCM upon the close of the Transaction.
Transaction Fee is defined as the fee received by PCM upon the close of a
Transaction based on 1.0% to 2.0% of the total Transaction Value.

     

    We look
forward to a long and productive relationship with you.

     

    
      
        
          
            	 
      	
                    Sincerely,

                  
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                    Prodos
      Capital Management LLC

                  
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                    /s/
      Douglas Song

                  
	 
      	
                    Douglas
      Song

                  
	 
      	
                    Managing
      Director

                  


          

        

      

    

    


    Acknowledged:

    


    Blackhawk
Capital Group BDC, Inc.

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    /s/
      Craig A. Zabala

                  
	
                    Craig
      A. Zabala

                  
	
                    President
      and Chief Executive
Officer

                  


          

        

      

    

    


    757 Third
Ave., Suite 1703 New York, NY 10017 Telephone: 212.972-3619 Facsimile:
212.972-0010
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
Art Dimensions, Inc.(the Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended herein as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Rebecca
Gregarek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.
 
 Dated:March 31, 2010
 
 Art
      Dimensions, Inc.By:
              /s/Rebecca
      GregarekRebecca
      Gregarek
                Chief
      Executive Officer
TS-CKHI01

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d

Manufacturing and Processing Informatio n on the New Chemical Substance at

Industrial Sites Controlled by the SubmitterTS-CKHI01 Attachment #4

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter
Michael T. BARNETT, Respondent, v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., and Trumbull Insurance Company, Appellants.

WD 81801

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: March 12, 2019

William C. Spooner, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent.

Thomas D. Billam, Overland Park, KS, Attorney for Appellants.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, Thomas N. Chapman, Judge, and Cory Atkins, Special Judge

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Harley-Davidson Motor Company and its insurer, Trumbull Insurance Company, (collectively, Harley-Davidson) appeal from a Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) Final Award Allowing Compensation to Michael Barnett. In its sole point on appeal, Harley-Davidson argues that the Commission erred in its award because Barnett presented insufficient competent evidence to support a finding that an occupational exposure was the prevailing factor in causing his medical condition and disability. Because there was sufficient competent evidence in the record as a whole to support the Commission's finding of medical causation, we affirm the Commission's award. Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

________________________________

)

ANGELA RENEE SOUTHERLAND, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) Civil Action No. 14-2158 (KBJ)

)

OFFICE OF DISABILITY )

ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW, )

)

Defendant. )

________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance 

and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal [ECF No. 7]. 1 In its 

June 29, 2015 Order, the Court directed the plaintiff to file an opposition or other 

response to the defendant’s motion. The Court advised the plaintiff of her obligations 

under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond

each motion and warned plaintiff that, if she failed to file a timely opposition, the Court 

would treat the motion as conceded. To date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the

motion, or requested more time to file an opposition, or advised the Court of any change 

of address. The Court, therefore, will grant the defendant’s motion as conceded and will 

dismiss this action. An Order is issued separately.

DATE: August 4, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

United States District Judge

1

 Although the briefing schedule set May 1, 2015 as the deadline for the plaintiff’s motion for 

judgment of reversal, the plaintiff did not file a motion.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Packaging Dynamics
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Frank V. Tannura, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Patrick T. Chambliss, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ FRANK V. TANNURA
-------------------------------------
Name: Frank v. Tannura
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: October 28, 2005


/s/ PATRICK T. CHAMBLISS
-------------------------------------
Name: Patrick t. Chambliss
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: October 28, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Packaging Dynamics Corporation and will be retained by Packaging
Dynamics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,138-03

EX PARTE HAROLD LEON RYALS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 20140D00184 IN THE 41 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

assault of a public servant and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment for each count. He did not

appeal his convictions. Applicant’s first writ application did not challenge the legal validity of the

conviction or sentence. 

Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because he conducted no independent investigation of the charges and insisted that Applicant plead

guilty, against his wishes. Applicant also alleges that counsel misinformed him about his right to a
2

speedy trial and used Applicant’s confinement in the County Jail as leverage to coerce him into

pleading guilty without prior discussion of Applicant’s options. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether Applicant would have

insisted on a trial, but for counsel’s deficient performance. The trial court shall also make any other

findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of

Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 13, 2016

Do not publish
#### Annie Johnson *v.*State Compensation Commissioner

(No. 7572)

Submitted February 28, 1933.

Decided March 28, 1933.

*H. W. Dushhoff,*for relator.

*Howard B. Lee,*Attorney General, and *B. Dennis Steed,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Litz, Judge:

Relator, Annie Johnson, seeks a peremptory writ of mandamus, compelling the state compensation commissioner to set aside an order discontinuing payments of compensation to her, as a dependent widow, or to grant her a hearing upon the charges prompting the entry of said order.

Charlie F. Johnson died of a fatal injury sustained February 4, 1925, while employed by Weyanoke Coal & Coke Company, survived by a widow (the relator) and two children within the age of dependency. She was paid compensation until April, 1926, when the commissioner discontinued payments to her, after an ex parte investigation, on a charge of concubinage. A long correspondence between relator and the commissioner followed, during which she insisted on knowing why her compensation had been discontinued and demanded an opportunity to answer any charges the commissioner held against her, while he persistently refused to inform her of the cause and merely replied that he had revoked his order awarding her compensation after investigating her case. She asserts *518she was not informed of the charge until after employing counsel in October, 1932, who advised her after he had examined the file in the compensation department. On December 3, 1932, she filed with the commissioner her formal petition, supported by affidavits, denying the charge upon which the commissioner acted, and requesting a hearing thereon, but he refused to consider the petition because of lapse of time.

The commissioner had no authority to sustain the charges without informing relator and giving her an opportunity to be heard. "We therefore award the writ requiring the commissioner to grant her a hearing.

*Writ awarded.*
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2483 — Group Canal+/RTL/GJCD/JV)

(2005/C 130/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 November 2001, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
[Nos. 21804-0-III; 21805-8-III; 21806-6-III.

Division Three.

May 25, 2004.]

#### *In the Matter of the Welfare of*Krista H. *In the Matter of the Welfare of*Blake T. *In the Matter of the Welfare of*Nicole T.

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Benton County, Nos. 01-7-00467-6,01-7-00468-4, and 01-7-00469-2, Vic L. VanderSchoor, J., entered February 5, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Kato, C.J., and Brown, J.
Executive Severance Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.14 
 EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN 
 BACKGROUND 

The company’s Executive Severance Plan covers the company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each Vice President of the
company, and such other officers as are designated to be eligible under this plan by the company’s Chief Executive Officer. The plan is a successor plan to that of FMC Technologies, which was approved by FMC Technologies’ Compensation
Committee in January 2008. 
 APPLICATION 
 Only individuals involuntarily terminated by the company are eligible for benefits under the plan. Individuals must also remain with the company through a mutually acceptable release date for payments and
benefits under the plan. 
 Individuals covered by the plan are not eligible for other pay or benefits available to JBT Corporation employees
under the company’s Employee Severance Plan. 
 Individuals covered by the plan receive the same pay and benefits regardless of age or
years of service. 
 No benefit will be paid under the plan that is duplicative of any benefit paid to an eligible individual under the
company’s change in control agreement with such individual. 
 KEY PROVISIONS 
  

			
	 Severance Amount:
	  	15 months base pay and target bonus.
		
	 Current Year Bonus:
	  	Pro rata payment of bonus based on salary through termination date, provided the performance goals underlying the bonus have been attained.
		
	 Medical/Dental Benefits:
	  	Continued for 15 months; executive pays active employee premiums.
		
	 Retirement Benefits:
	  	No enhanced benefits.
		
	 Other Insurance Benefits:
	  	Cancelled at termination.
		
	 Long-Term Equity:
	  	Judgment delegated to CEO for any special treatment of vested/unvested options or restricted stock.

  

 - 1 - 









			
	 Other Benefits:
	  	Outplacement assistance
		  	 Vacation pay – earned, accrued and carried over (2 weeks maximum).
 Financial planning assistance.
 Tax preparation assistance.

		
	 Conditions:
	  	 Non-disclosure.
 Non-compete.
 Non-solicitation.


  

 - 2 -
Exhibit 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   December 14, 2010
    /s/ Charles R. Daniel, IIICharles R. Daniel, IIIExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Controller,
Treasurer, and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
[No. 31285-9-II.

Division Two.

May 18, 2004.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage*of Lee Tass De Stael, *Respondent,*and Heather L. De Stael, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 98-3-01876-1, Roger A. Bennett, J., entered Deember 4, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Houghton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Louis T. Fox, III, Chief Financial Officer of Hartman Short Term Income Properties XX, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 ("the Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  May 30, 2013  /s/ Louis T. Fox, IIILouis T. Fox, IIIChief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Amerilithium Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Matthew Worrall
                                 ----------------------
                                 Matthew Worrall
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

June 27, 2011
----

            COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2007/39/EC

of 26 June 2007         

amending Annex II to Council Directive 90/642/EEC as regards maximum residue levels for diazinon

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/642/EEC of 27 November 1990 on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on certain products of plant origin, including fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Directive 90/642/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.

Article 2

Member States shall adopt and publish, by 27 December 2007 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.

They shall apply those provisions from 28 December 2007.

When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.

Article 3

This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 4

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 June 2007.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 350, 14.12.1990, p. 71. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2007/28/EC (OJ L 135, 26.5.2007, p. 6).

(2)  Guidelines for predicting dietary intake of pesticide residues (revised), prepared by the GEMS/Food Programme in collaboration with the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues, published by the World Health Organisation 1997 (WHO/FSF/FOS/97.7).

----

ANNEX

In Part A of Annex II to Directive 90/642/EEC, the lines for diazinon are replaced by the following:

----

(*1)  Indicates the lower limit of analytical determination.’         

----
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Jeffery C. Swank, as President of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Jeffery C. Swank                 Jeffery C. SwankPresidentDate:  May 16, 2005This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,354]


American Pride, LLC, Guilford, ME; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 24, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
American Pride, LLC, Guilford, Maine.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6303 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P