alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w39






Exhibit 10.39




SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.

Annual Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers




     Set forth below are the base salaries for persons identified as “named executive officers” of
Synovus Financial Corp. (”Synovus”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Position	 	Base Salary
	Richard E. Anthony

	 	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	928,200	 
	Thomas J. Prescott

	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	387,000	 
	Elizabeth R. James

	 	Vice Chairman, Chief People Officer and Secretary
	 	$	431,000	 
	Mark G. Holladay

	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer
	 	$	315,000	 
	Samuel F. Hatcher

	 	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
	 	$	325,000
Nathaniel BURKES, Claimant/Appellant, v. JOE FAZIO BAKERY, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.

No. ED 107411

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: June 18, 2019

Nathaniel Burkes, Appellant Acting Pro Se.

Joe Fazio Bakery, Inc., Respondent Acting Pro Se.

Todd A. Scott, Bart A. Matanic, 421 East Dunklin St., PO Box 59, Jefferson City, MO 65104, For Respondent DES.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Burkes ("Claimant") appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the "Commission") affirming the dismissal of Claimant's case because Claimant's appeal to the Division of Employment Security Appeals Tribunal was untimely filed. Because we find the Commission's decision to be based on competent and substantial evidence, we affirm the Commission's decision.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 4.25.5


 


APPENDIX NO. 4


to Agency Agreement


No.                dt.               2006


 


List of Associated Operators


 


	
  Ref. 

  No.

  	
   

  	
  Operator’s full

  name

  	
   

  	
  Operator’s trade 

  name

  	
   

  	
  License

  number

  	
   

  	
  Legal address

  	
   

  	
  Physical 

  address

  
	
  1.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  2.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  3.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


	
  Rostelecom: 

  General Director

  OAO Rostelecom 

  

  

                              D.Ye.
  Yerokhin

                              200  

  Seal here

  	
   

  	
  Operator: 

  General Director 

  OJSC Sibirtelecom:

  

                                    A.I.
  Nikulin 

                                                  2006

  Seal here

  



 


1
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Asia Global Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Asia Global Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Asia Global Holdings Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





Date:
      August 13, 2010
              /s/Ping-Shun
      LaiPing-Shun
      Lai, Interim Chief Financial
Officer
From: ALDRIDGE Steve [steve.aldridge@us.knaufinsulation.com]

Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:27 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov; Reeves, David

Subject: FW: Residual Risk data response to EPA

Attachments: Shelbyville Aerial view with stk locations 5-25-11.jpg; Shasta Lake Aerial view 

with stk locations 5-25-11.jpg; Lanett Aerial view with stk locations 5-25-11.jpg;

Copy of Wool Fiberglass Modeling Sources by Co 5 26 11 - Knauf.xls

Ms. Hancy,

Please find attached Knauf Insulation’s Modeling Sources spreadsheet and aerial photo with stack IDs 

added as requested by EPA through Angus Crane at NAIMA. We are working on the four additional 

questions submitted to Mr. Crane and should have that info to you by the end of next week. 

If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call. 

Stephen R. Aldridge 

Manager Corporate EH&S 

KNAUFINSULATION

Tel: 866-445-2363, Ext. 8408 | Fax: 317-398-5501 | Mobile: 317-401-0564

Before printing, please think about the environment!

DISCLAIMER of Knauf Insulation: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 

intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the 

named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. If you have received this 

message in error please notify postmaster@us.knaufinsulation.com and delete the message and any 

attachments accompanying it immediately. Although Knauf Insulation operates an active anti-virus 

policy, the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. 

Please note that any views expressed in this e-mail may be those of the originator and do not necessarily 

reflect those of the organization.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 7, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10165 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Pl aint iffAppellee,

versus TRINO GARCIA-SALAZAR, DefendantAppellant.

------------------------------------------------------------ Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-125-ALL

------------------------------------------------------------ Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Trino Garcia -Sal azar appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following his conviction for illegal reentry int o the Unit ed States. Garcia-Salazar argues that the district court erred by basing his sentence, w hich was above the pertinent guidelines range, on facts that were not admitted or established beyo nd a reasonable doubt. Garcia-Salazar further contends that the district court failed to give proper consideration to the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).-2-

Garcia-Salazar’ s argum

ent concerning factual findings is unavailing. S ee United States v. Johnson , 445 F.3d 793, 797-98 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 2884 (2006). Garcia-Salazar’s claim concerning the § 3553(a) factors is refuted by the record, which reflects th at the district court gave proper consideration to these factors when sentencing Garcia-Salazar. Garcia-Salazar has not shown that the district court abused it s discretion at sentencing, nor has he shown th at his sentence is unreasonable. S ee United States v. Smith , 440 F.3d 704, 706-07 (5th Cir. 2006). Garcia-Salazar’s argument concerning his rights under the Ex Post Facto and Due Process Clauses is, as he concedes, unavailing. S ee United States v. Scroggins , 411 F.3d 572, 575-76 (5th Cir. 2005). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 8, 2015

No. 04-14-00918-CR

Gary A. CAMPBELL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3125

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Strike is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Smitten, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB/a  of Stock  Market
Solutions, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation,  particularly  during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

                               /s/ RICHARD SMITTEN
                              ---------------------------
                              Richard Smitten
                              CEO and CFO

January 6, 2006
Exhibit 32.2.  Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wm. Chris Mathers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Wm. Chris Mathers


Wm. Chris Mathers, Chief Financial Officer


November 22, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Asia Global Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Asia Global Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Asia Global Holdings Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: February 21, 2010
/s/ Ping-Shun LaiPing-Shun Lai, Chief Executive Officer
Thomas PENNING, Respondent, v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Appellant.

WD 81808

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: April 23, 2019

Thomas D. Billam, Lee's Summit, for appellant.

Joshua P. Perkins, Kansas City for respondent.

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Gary D. Witt, Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam *159Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc., ("Employer"), and its insurer, American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania ("Insurer") appeal the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") awarding workers' compensation benefits to employee Thomas Penning. Employer and Insurer contend the Commission's award was erroneous because there was insufficient evidence that the accident was the prevailing factor in causing Penning's medical condition. Employer and Insurer further assert that the Commission acted without or in excess of its powers by ignoring Penning's failure to provide statutorily-required written notice to Employer of an occupational disease and by allowing Penning to "transfer" his allegation of injury from one claim to a separate claim. For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)
Exhibit  32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                   ACT OF 2002

     I,  Michael  S.  Pagnano,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly  Report  of  WGL  Entertainment  Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly  period  ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information  contained  in  such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents in all material
respects  the financial condition and results of operations of WGL Entertainment
Holdings,  Inc.

                                       WGL  ENTERTAINMENT  HOLDINGS,  INC.
                                       ---------------------------

DATED:  November  20,  2006            By:  /s/  Michael  S.  Pagnano
                                            -------------------------
                                            Michael  S.  Pagnano
                                            Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                            Chief  Financial  Officer

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report

I, Richard McBee, Chief
Executive Officer of Mitel Networks Corporation (Mitel), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mitel, for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2011 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mitel.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:March 2, 2011



/s/ Richard McBeeName:

Richard McBeeTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The undersigned, Justin Farry, Chief Financial Officer of GreenHouse Holdings, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
the annual report on Form 10-K of GreenHouse Holdings, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GreenHouse Holdings, Inc.
 Dated: April 14, 2010
 
 /s/ Justin FarryName:  Justin FarryTitle:  Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to GreenHouse Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by GreenHouse Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ReedJ. Killion, Chief Executive Officer, President and Principal Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

·                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | May 1,  2009 |   | By:    | /s/  Reed J. Killion                                                                  |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |              |   |   | Reed  J. Killion, Chief Executive Officer, President and Principal Executive  Officer |

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and willbe retained by Uni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7384
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALONZO MATIN WILSON, JR., a/k/a June, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-97-117) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alonzo Matin Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alonzo M. Wilson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Wilson has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. SeeUnited States v. Wilson , No. CR-97-117 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Chuck Kretchman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of US Natural Gas Corp, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of US Natural Gas Corp.
  Date: April 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Chuck KretchmanChuck KretchmanChief Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided o US Natural Gas Corp, and will be retained by US Natural Gas Corp, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.