alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Board resolutions approving corporate opportunity waiver




 Exhibit 4.5 
 BOARD RESOLUTIONS APPROVING CORPORATE OPPORTUNITY WAIVER 
 ADOPTED AT A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS 
 ON OCTOBER 17, 2007 
 WHEREAS: The Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be in effect following the Company’s reincorporation from California to Delaware (the “Pre-IPO Certificate”) was adopted and
approved at the June 27, 2007 meeting. 
 WHEREAS: The form of Certificate of Incorporation in effect after the closing of the Offering
(the “Post-IPO Certificate”) was adopted and approved at the June 27, 2007 meeting. 
 WHEREAS: Absent a specific waiver, under
Delaware law, a company’s directors and officers, and possibly controlling stockholders, have a duty to surrender to the Company any business opportunities related to the business of such company that are presented to such directors and
officers, and possibly controlling stockholders (“Corporate Opportunities”). 
 WHEREAS: Section 122(17) of the Delaware General
Corporation Law (“DGCL”) allows a company to renounce interests of the Company in such Corporate Opportunities. 
 WHEREAS: The
applicability of Section 122(17) of the DGCL to controlling stockholders is not well settled. 
 WHEREAS: Tako Ventures LLC, an entity
controlled by Lawrence J. Ellison, is the controlling stockholder of the Company. 
 WHEREAS: The Board has considered the following benefits
to be derived by the Company and its stockholders from the approval of a waiver of the corporate opportunity doctrine as it applies to Mr. Ellison – the completion of the Company’s initial public offering and the transfer of shares by
Tako Ventures into a voting trust that will act similar to a “lockbox” LLC with specific voting instructions that will eliminate Mr. Ellison’s voting control over all Company matters other than a change of control transaction,
dissolution, sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets or a liquidation for so long as Mr. Ellison remains either an officer or director of Oracle Corporation. 
 WHEREAS: The Board has reviewed and discussed the benefits and drawbacks of renouncing the Company’s right to Corporate Opportunities arising from Mr. Ellison pursuant to Section 122(17)
of the DGCL and the benefits of all current and future stockholders of the Company having clarity over whether Mr. Ellison has a duty to share Corporate Opportunities with the Company. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Company waives Mr. Ellison’s obligation, to the extent it exists, to present Corporate Opportunities to
the Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          51124
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82225
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    182322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               326753
<PP&E>                                         333396
<DEPRECIATION>                                 322773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 345143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165976
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                      4472042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    400000
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   345143
<SALES>                                        325073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325073
<CGS>                                          193138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15801
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15801
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15801
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00


</TABLE>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Michael C. Himes 

HiRez Productions 

1101 South State Street Apt 2202 

Chicago, Illinois 60605 

mikehimes9@gmail.com

312.735.0768
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 20-3177

_____________

SURENDER MALHAN,

 Appellant

v.

DAVID B. KATZ; GURBIR SING GREWAL; PHILIP DUNTON MURPHY

_______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civil No. 2-20-cv-08955)

District Judge: Honorable Susan D. Wigenton

_______________

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

June 22, 2021

Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, MATEY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

_______________

JUDGMENT ORDER

_______________
2

After consideration of all contentions raised by appellant, it is ADJUDGED AND 

ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed. Costs taxed 

against appellant.

By the Court,

s/ Paul B. Matey

Circuit Judge

Attest: 

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

Dated: June 28, 2021
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105


## FEB 27 2012
Mr. C. L. Stathos Commander, NavyRegion Southwest Department ofthe Navy 937 North HarborDrive San Diego, California 92132-0058 Re: Potential classification ofSan Diego as Serious for the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard DearMr. Stathos: Thank you for your letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Region 9 Regional AdministratorJared Blumenfeld dated February9,2012 (your additional reference information: 5090, SerN40JRR.cs/008). Your letterrequests that EPA not classifythe San Diego nonattainment as Serious for the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) and instead find that the area has attained the standard based on 2009-2011 data. We appreciate hearing yourconcerns about a potential Serious ozone nonattainment classification and the potential impacts on permitting and general conformity for Department ofthe Navy activities in your southwest region. We have been working closely with you and with staffat the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) and EPA's national Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards to address your issues. We thank you for taking the time to discuss your concerns with us. We will keep you informed as ourrulemaking proceeds. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me orAmyZimpfer, Associate Director, AirDivision, ofmy staffat415-947-4146 or zimpfer.amy@epa.gov. Sincerely, 

# If!!t:fuJ

Director, AirDivision

cc: Robert J. Kard, San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
EXHIBIT 10(d)    Marketing  Agreement  between  Prince  Marketing
                 Group, Inc. and Estelle Reyna.





                       MARKETING AGREEMENT

The parties to this Agreement are Prince Marketing Group, Inc.
(hereinafter "PMG"), a New Jersey based corporation and the
undersigned ("Artist").

Artist grants PMG the rights to market Artist and to negotiate on
behalf of Artist.  This will include but not be limited to:
advertising, promotion, print, television, appearances,
endorsements, marketing, campaigns, theater, video, Internet,
public relations, employment, etc.

Artist will provide PMG with images and promotional materials for
distribution.

Artist and PMG will each have links on their web sites directing
traffic to the other party's site.  Link on Artist's site to
PMG's site will mention some verbage similar to: "Business
Opportunities" or "To contact Artist".  PMG's site will feature a
section devoted to Artist's promotion and gainful employment.

PMG may approach individuals or companies in an attempt to secure
marketing, public relations, employment or other for Artist and
title PMG to the individuals or companies as Artist's marketing
firm.

Artist agrees that any relationship or lead that has been
generated by or arrive to Artist directly or indirectly from the
efforts of PMG will be negotiated on behalf of Artist exclusively
by PMG, in addition Artist and his/her affiliates will refer all
leads to PMG.

When appropriate, Artist will mention his/her agent Prince
Marketing Group or www.princemarketinggroup.com in any and all
public relation events/interviews.

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

Prince Marketing Group                 Estelle Reyna c/o Estelle Reyna, Inc.
454 Prospect Ave, Suite 74             5006 Coolidge Avenue
West Orange, NJ 07052                  Culver City, CA 90230
                                       SS# ###-##-####
                                       Fed ID# ###-##-####

By: /s/ Darren Prince  Date 4/2/03     By: /s/ Estelle Reyna  Date 4/2/03
    -----------------                      -----------------
    Darren Prince                          "Artist"
    Prince Marketing Group, Inc.           Estelle Reyna
                                           Estelle Reyna, Inc.
EXHIBIT 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christina Anagnostara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.




Date: March 31, 2011








/s/ Christina Anagnostara


Christina Anagnostara


Principal Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-18-00167-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 1093378

Style: Wayne Myers

v Pennymac Corp.

Date motion filed*: December 6, 2018

Type of motion: Motion for extension to file a motion for rehearing

Party filing motion:

Document to be filed: Motion for Rehearing

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: 11/7/18

Number of previous extensions granted: 1

Date Requested: Jan. 7, 2019

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

December 13, 2018
file:///G|/OA-OARM-OECA-OEI-OGC-ORD-TRI/Nguyet/OAR-2014-0557%205085.%206_12_2014%20-%20Ken%20Rand.txt[9/26/2014 9:26:51 AM]

 From: Ken Rand <ru.canal@gmail.com>

 To: OilandGas.Whitepapers

 Date: 6/12/2014 4:30:25 AM

Subject: Propose methane emission standards

-------------------------------------------

Dear Administrator McCarthy,

Thank you for considering new standards to control oil and gas industry methane emissions. In order to appropriately 

address the effects of climate change, we have to control methane emissions in addition to addressing carbon pollution 

from power plants.

Cutting methane leaks will also reduce emissions of dangerous toxins and particulate matter, stop waste, and conserve 

a valuable energy resource. Local communities and mineral owners benefit as well as the global climate.

I urge you to move forward on these rules.

Thank you, 

Ken Rand

310 S. 3rd Ave.

Bozeman, MT 59715
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Walter Reid Green, Jr., as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green, Jr.Walter Reid Green, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate:  May 24, 2010








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices 

# Order

February 3, 2012

144544 & (19)(20)

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, Respondent-Appellee,

v SC: 144544 COA: 307964 MERC: R11 D-034 GRADUATE EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION/AFT, Petitioner-Appellee,

and

STUDENTS AGAINST GSRA UNIONIZATION and MELINDA DAY, Proposed Intervenors-Appellants,

and

MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Proposed Intervenor-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we ar e not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motio n for stay is DENIED.

Y OUNG , C.J. ( concurring ).

I concur in this Court’s order denying leav e to appeal in this matter. The Court of Appeals reached the correct result when it dismissed the proposed intervenors’ application for lack of jurisdic tion, although I believe a different rationale controls this

matter.

The Court of Appeals claimed that MCL 24.301 does not give it jurisdiction to
hear this matter “because the cu rrent proceeding . . . is not a contested case.” Thus, the Court of Appeals interpreted MCL 24.301 as allowing interlocutory appeals only duringI, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 3, 2012

d0203 2

contested cases. While the proposed intervenors presen t nonfrivolous arguments rejecting that claim, the Court of Appeals doe s not have jurisdiction in this particular matter even if MCL 24.301 genera lly allows interlocutory appeals on matters that are not
contested cases.

MCL 24.301 is part of the Administ rative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq.

, and provides that “[a] preliminary, procedural or intermediate agency action or ruling is not immediately reviewable, except that the court may grant leave for review of such action if review of the agency’s final deci sion or order would not provide an adequate remedy” (emphasis added). Another provis ion of the Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.203(5), expressly defines “court” w ithin the Act as “the circuit court.” Accordingly, the interlocutory review provis ion of MCL 24.301 requires an appellant to
seek circuit court review of an agency’s action be fore proceeding to the Court of Appeals. Because the propose d intervenors did not do so here, the Court of Appeals
reached the correct result in dismissing their application for lack of jurisdiction.
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Bruce
Goldstein, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2009, of SeaOspa Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)          Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)          Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)          Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)          All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)          Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Dated:  April
16, 2010




/s/ Bruce GoldsteinBruce
      GoldsteinPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Paul W. Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer of Avrupa Minerals Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 14, 2014







/s/  Paul W. Kuhn

Paul W. Kuhn,

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Beta Music Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

         3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: August 4, 2010

                                       By: /s/ Edwin Mendlinger
                                           --------------------
                                           Edwin Mendlinger
                                           Chief Financial Officer