alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6389]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Staff Implementation Guidance

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 
Advisory Board Staff Implementation Guidance 31.1: Guidance for 
Implementation of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 
31, Accounting for Fiduciary Activities.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Board Action: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, section 10(a)(2), and the FASAB Rules Of 
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) staff has 
issued Staff Implementation Guidance (SIG) 31.1: Guidance for 
Implementation of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 
31, Accounting for Fiduciary Activities.
    The SIG will be available at http://www.fasab.gov/codifica.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Payne, Executive Director, 441 G 
St., NW., Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-
7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92463.

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-6389 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of**

**the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officersof Dividend Capital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) that:

 

(1)                      the Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                      the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date: August 13, 2003 | */s/*Evan  H. Zucker       |   |
|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|   |                  | Evan H. Zucker             |
|   |                  | *Chief Executive  Officer* |
|   |                  |                       |
|   |                  |                       |
|   | Date: August 13, 2003 | */s/*James  R. Mulvihill   |   |
|   |                  | James R. Mulvihill         |
|   |                  | *Chief Financial  Officer* |
|   |                  |

 

----
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 

## NOV 17 2011 Mr. Dan Bevier Salt River Project P. O. Box 1018 St.Johns,Aurizona 85936

DearMr. Bevier:

I am writing to inform you that EPA Region 9 is developing a partial Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the state ofAurizona. The purpose ofthe Regional Haze FIP is to improve visibility in national parks and wilderness areas in Aurizona and surrounding states as required by Section 169A ofthe Clean Air Act (Act). During the process ofdeveloping the Aurizona Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to EPA on March 2,2011, the Aurizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) performed a five-factor BestAvailable Retrofit Technology (BART) analysis for the Coronado Generating Station. We will revisit ADEQ's determination, and possibly conduct a new five-factor BART analysis, to determine whether any additional emissions controls are warranted under section 169A(b)(2)(A) ofthe Act, and EPA's implementing regulations and BART guidelines at 40 CFRPart 51, Subpart P and Appendix Y.

As we begin our FIP analysis, we have requested that ADEQprovide us with all background materials, including BART analyses, that were performed by them orthe affected facilities. We mayalso request that you provide us with additional information onthe Coronado Generating Station as our analysis proceeds. In the meantime, we welcome the submission ofany additional, relevant information that you would like to provide to our office.

EPA has entered into a consent decree thatrequires theAgencyto propose approval ofAurizona's Regional Haze SIP and/orpropose a Regional HazeFIP that meets the requirements ofthe Act and EPA's regional haze regulations byMay 15, 2012. The consent decree also requires the Agencyto take final action on the Aurizona Regional Haze SIP and/orFIP byNovember 15,2012. EPA Region 9 will hold public hearings in Aurizona and solicitpublic comments on a proposed Aurizona Regional Haze FIP in the months preceding theNovember 15 deadline.

Ifyou would like to submit any additional information or analysis, we request that you send it by February29,2012. Anymodeling ofthe facility should use the regulatoryversions ofCALPUFF (version 5.8, level 070623), CALMET (version 5.8, level 070623), and CALPOST (version 6.221). You maywish to prepare a modeling protocol and consult with EPARegion 9 about the preparation of modeling inputs in accord with EPA guidance. Submit any infonnation to:

Thomas Webb US EPA(AIR-2) 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

### You can also reach Thomas at webb.thomas@epa.gov or byphone at 415-947-4139.

Thankyou for your attention to this matter. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Thomas Webb or myself(mckaughan.colJeen@epa.gov, 520-498-0118).

Colleen McKaughan Associate Director, AirDivision

cc: HenryR. Darwin, ADEQ Eric Massey, ADEQ
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201O-NM-061-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on asubstantial number ofsmall entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Isit appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,071]


Frito Lay/Pepsico; San Antonio, TX; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 3, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Frito Lay/
PepsiCo, San Antonio, Texas.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5907 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano                                                  
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer                             
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 412 

In the matter of Adam Schiff. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2023 

Mrs. LUNA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ethics 

RESOLUTION 

In the matter of Adam Schiff. 

1 Resolved, That, pursuant to article I, section 5, clause 

2 2 of the Constitution of the United States, Representative 

3 Adam Schiff, be, and he hereby is, expelled from the 

4 House of Representatives. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Color
Accents Holdings, Inc.,for the year ending July 31, 2009, I, Diane Pyun, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Color Accents Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Color Accents Holdings, Inc.






Color Accents Holdings, Inc.Date:   September 21, 2009
By:
/s/ Diane PyunDiane PyunChief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ideal Accents, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ideal Accents, Inc., and will be retained by Ideal Accents, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/S/ Karim Suleman__________________

Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer,

President, Director and Chief Financial

Officer



Date:  July 31, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,169]


Lyon Workerspace Products, LLC, Montgomery, IL; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 9, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by an official of the Illinois Department of Employment 
Security on behalf of workers at Lyon Workerspace Products, LLC, 
Montgomery, Illinois.
    The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6528 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Joseph DeMeo, Respondent, v Michael Grimaldi, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 595]

— In an action, *inter alia,*for the partition of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated December 20, 1999, as denied his motion for summary judgment on his counterclaims.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his counterclaims is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that he was entitled to enforce the partnership agreement entered into by the parties. The plaintiff’s opposition papers failed to demon*446strate, by evidentiary proof, the existence of a material issue of fact requiring a trial. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his counterclaims should have been granted *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320).

However, since the defendant is also seeking an attorney’s fee for breach of the partnership agreement, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court for a hearing on that issue. Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132155 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132155 COA: 270965 Oakland CC: 2003-192851-FC PAUL GEORGE PAQUETTE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 7, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
[No. 52558-1-I.

Division One.

May 10, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Dorunda Hall, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-06286-1, Catherine D. Shaffer, J., entered May 19, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 10 (p)

Broadcast Agreement with Tiger Eye Broadcasting



[KARMA MEDIA: Business with a ConscienceTM]



IRWIN PODHAJSER

TIGER EYE BROADCASTING CORP.

3400 LAKESIDE DRIVE

SUITE 500

MIRAMAR, FL 33027

954-431-3144 (O)

786-423-7884 (C)

Broadcast Agreement



This agreement is between Tiger Eye Broadcasting (referred to as broadcaster) located in Miramar Fl. and Karma Media located in El Monte California.



Terms of Agreement:



Broadcaster agrees to air the 30 minute television program entitled Estelle's Paradise owned and distributed by Karma Media.  Broadcasts will begin on or before the week of July 5 2004 for a minimum of 26 consecutive weeks.  Either party may terminate this agreement for any reason with a 60 day advance written notice.  This agreement is automatically renewable unless either party desires to change all or part of this agreement.  Broadcaster agrees to air Estelle's Paradise a minimum of once per week between the hours of 6AM until midnight.  Providing the minimum is fulfilled the Broadcaster is granted permission by Karma Media to broadcast each episode on an unlimited basis.  The Broadcaster will provide Karma Media with program grids in advance of broadcast dates.



The Broadcaster and Karma Media will split 50/50 the commercial time during each airing of Estelles Paradise.  The commercial time is designated as 31⁄2 minutes to the broadcaster and 31⁄2 minutes to Karma Media.



Karma Media will deliver to 2 episodes by July 21, 2004 of Estelles Paradise on Beta format (please designate Beta SP, DVD or 3⁄4 inch tape) in a timely manner so that the broadcaster has sufficient time to review each episode prior to each broadcast.  In the event that an episode is determined to be unusable for broadcast Karma Media will make every effort to provide a replacement or the broadcaster may elect to air a previously aired episode.



The Broadcaster agrees to insert commercials per the direction of Karma Media and the broadcaster further agrees to provide Karma Media with affidavits or log sheets as validation that episodes and commercials have aired property.



The Broadcaster acknowledges that it is strictly prohibited from re-selling, licensing or bartering Estelle's Paradise to any other entity not mentioned in this agreement.



By signing below both parties agree to the terms and conditions of this agreement and acknowledge that they are authorized to execute this agreement.



|/s/         |  | Date: | 5/1/04 
|----------- |  | ----- | -------
|Broadcaster |  |       |        
|            |  |       |        
|/s/         |  | Date: | 4/27/04
|Karma Media |  |       |        



9660 Flair Drive, Suite 328 El Monte, CA 91731·Tel. 310-397-1200·Fax 310-398-2211

---
----

Corrigendum to summary information on State aid granted in conformity with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products

Aid No: XA 29/04

(Official Journal of the European Union C 110 of 5 May 2005)

(2005/C 117/11)

On page 9, in the second column, on the third line:

for:

‘Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 2004-2007’,

read:

‘Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 2004 to 2006’.

----
# Airworthiness Concern Sheet

Date:

Reason for Airworthiness Concern:

Attachments: Service Difficulty Report Accident/Incident Data System Service Letter / Bulletin Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin Federal Aviation Administration or National Transportation Safety Board

Safety Recommendation

Airworthiness Directive Alternate Means of Compliance Risk Analysis Transmittal:

Federal Aviation Administration Airplane Owners and Pilots Association Experimental Airc raft Association Type Club Type Certificate Holder Other: Response Requested By:

Emergency (10 days) Alert (30 days) Information (90 days) This Airworthiness Concern Sheet (ACS) is in tended as a means for FAA Aviation Safety Engineers to coordinate airworthiness con cerns with aircraft owners/operators through associ ations and type clubs. At this time, the FAA has not made a determination on what type of corrective action (if any) should be taken. The resolution of th is airworthiness concern could involve Airworthiness Directive (AD) action or a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB), or the FAA could determine that no action is needed at this time . The FAA’s final determination will depe nd in part on the information rece ived in response to this ACS.

The FAA endorses dissemination of this techni cal information to all manufacturers and requests association and type club commen ts. Make: Model / Series: Serial Numbers: Reply to: Name: Title: Office: Department: Street Address: City, State, ZIP: Telephone: Electronic Mail: 

### Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Description of Airworthiness Concern

Request for Information (For example: Proposed al ternate inspection or repair procedures, cost impact, etc. Your comments or replies to the FAA need to be as specific as possible. Please provide specific examples to illustrate your comments or concern s.) U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lone Moose Adventures, Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we,
Christopher B. Glover, President and Michael C. Brown, Secretary/Treasurer of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

Dated: 2/17/04                       Signature:/s/Christopher B. Glover
                                     Christopher B. Glover
                                     President

Dated: 2/17/04                       Signature:/s/Michael C. Brown
                                     Michael C. Brown
                                     Secretary/Treasurer
In the MATTER OF the MARRIAGE OF Jennifer Lee HORAN and Raj Lewis Horan and in the Interest of M.H.H. and K.M.H., Children

No. 07-18-00202-CV

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

January 7, 2019

Malinda Clawson Standefer, Lubbock, Texas, for Appellant

Gary M. Bellair, Lubbock, Texas, for Appellee

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ.

**ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS**

Per Curiam

Raj Lewis Horan, appellant, appeals from the trial court's judgment granting a divorce to the parties, establishing rights to the children, and dividing the parties' marital property, among other things. In his notice of appeal, Horan expressed his desire to "appeal the Court's judgment ... rendered on February 15, 2018." On December 20, 2018, the parties filed a "Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal" signed by both parties' attorneys. In the motion, they represented that "[t]he parties have reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences in the suit." The parties also request that we "set aside the trial court's judgment as to the division of the community estate without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties' agreement. Tex. R. App. P. 42.01(a)(2)(B)."

We grant the parties' joint motion and set aside that part of the judgment "as to the division of the community estate," and, as requested by the parties, remand the issue about the division of the community estate to the trial court for effectuation of their settlement agreement. As requested by the parties, we dismiss the remainder of the appeal without affirming the unmodified portions of the judgment.

It is so ordered.