alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,476] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 4, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by the company official on behalf of workers of Valentine Tool and Stamping, Inc., Norton, Massachusetts. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 10th day of March 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-6234 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Aaron S. THOMAS, Appellant.

No. ED 105937

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: February 13, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Jessica Hathaway, 120 S. Central Avenue, Suite 130, St. Louis, MO 63105.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

*283**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Thomas appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a bench trial for one count of statutory rape and two counts of statutory sodomy. There was no error, plain or otherwise, in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
### AUG.21.2015 !0:58AM FA A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7



### U.S. Depar1ment ofTransportation Federal Aviation AdJAi».istration 

### AUG 2 1

### 2011 ViaFacsimile Eastern Region Office ofRegional Counsel

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin AdministrativeLaw Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 FAX (202) 366-7536 ViaFirst Class Mail Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 800 IndependenceAvenue,

**~.W.** 

### Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Suite 2Wl000 FAX202-267-1293 NO. 9993 P 2/3



### 1Aviation Plaza Room 56I Jamaica, NY 11434 Telephone: 718-553-3272 Facsimile: 718-995-5699

Re: In the Matter ofGENE HARRISON DocketNo. F AA-20 14-0860 Case No. 2013EA700064
Dear Judge Goodwin and Hearing Docket Clerk:AUG. 21.2015 !0:59AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 9993 P 3/3
This is to confirm that the parties to the above-referenced matter have reached a settlement. Therefore, Respondent, Gene Harrison, withdraws his request for a hearing and the Complainant, FAA, withdraws its complaint Please call me at (718) 553-3272 ifyou have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Jeanine C. Gotimer Attorney For 

### Complainant:



# ~ili **Je~Gotimer** Attorney 

### Fo2;spondent: 

# L

**?o.-~1** 

# - Gene Harrison Respondent Date

Date

### AUG. 212015 10:58AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7



### To: Company: Phone: Fax: 

### P02-- 

### 3/....u

**"15~** 

### jJ

# o _j_ 

### dJ-1#7 I

## M3



## From:~/-~

Title: 

## /:l+£~ Date: 

# (j.);/

**8Vr~­** Pages:

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NO. 9993 P 1/3 

### Federal Aviation Administration Office of Regional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza, Rm. 561 Jamaica, NY 11434 1718-553- F718-995-0099 Em<Ju:

This facsimile and the document(s) accompanying this facsimile transmission contain confidential information that is legally privileged, The information is intended only for the use of the recipient named above If you have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify this office by telephone You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, ortaking any action in reliance on the content ofthis facsimile is strictly prohibited.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-K of China
Advanced Meditech, Inc., for the year ending July 31, 2009,
I, Wong Wa Kei
Anthony, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:





1.
   Such yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending July 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
   The information contained in such yearly Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended July 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Advanced
Meditech, Inc.





Dated:November 10, 2009





China
Advanced Meditech, Inc.





By:
            /s/Wong Wa Kei Anthony
              President,
      Secretary,
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 54 (Monday, March 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6370]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Date and Time: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

Place: Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office 
Building, 131 ``M'' Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.

Status: The meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters To Be Considered

    Closed Session: Litigation Recommendation: Amicus Curiae 
Participation.

    Note: Any matter not discussed or concluded may be carried over 
to a later meeting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC 
Commission meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also 
provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future 
Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information.

Contact Person for More Information: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: March 18, 2009.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
 [FR Doc. E9-6370 Filed 3-19-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
exhibita-firstamendment.htm







EXHIBIT A to FIRST AMENDMENT TO AND RESTATEMENT OF MINERAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION AGREEMENT

 

SAN ENRIQUE PROPERTIES, ATACAMA REGION III CHILE

 






	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  
	
NOMBRE
	
LUGAR
	
ESTADO
	
NORTE
	
ESTE
	
Sam 56
	
Presentacion
	
FOJAS
	
NUMERO
	
NOTARIA
	
Hect. Totales
	
Hect. Sobrepuestas

	
Esperanza del 1 al 10
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Mensura en Revision
	
6905280
	
358885
	
Sam 56
	
5/6/2008
	
3090 Vta.
	
2509
	
COPIAPO
	
100
	  
	
La Recuperada del 1 al 10
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Mensura en Revision
	
6904700
	
358750
	
Sam 56
	
2/9/2009
	
840 Vta.
	
629
	
COPIAPO
	
90
	  
	
La Maria del 1 al 10
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Solicitud de Mensura
	
6905700
	
358200
	
Sam 56
	
5/19/2009
	
374
	
2498
	
COPIAPO
	
70
	  
	
Negro
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Pedimento
	
6906900
	
359450
	
Sam 56
	
10/9/2009
	
6755
	
5073
	
COPIAPO
	
300
	
300

	
Negro Uno
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Conc. de Exploración
	
6906900
	
357450
	
Sam 56
	
11/17/2008
	
8331
	
6544
	
COPIAPO
	
300
	
300

	
Negro Dos
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Conc. de Exploración
	
6904900
	
358700
	
Sam 56
	
11/17/2008
	
8332 Vta.
	
6545
	
COPIAPO
	
300
	
300

	
Negro Tres
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Conc. de Exploración
	
6905900
	
358950
	
Sam 56
	
11/17/2008
	
8333 Vta.
	
6546
	
COPIAPO
	
200
	
200

	
Negro Cuatro
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Conc. de Exploración
	
6905500
	
360500
	
Sam 56
	
6/25/2009
	
4243 Vta.
	
3104
	
COPIAPO
	
300
	
300

	
Negro Cinco
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Conc. de Exploración
	
6903900
	
358500
	
Sam 56
	
6/25/2009
	
4233 Vta.
	
3105
	
COPIAPO
	
300
	
300

	
Negro Seis
	
Sierra   Negra
	
Conc. de Exploración
	
6902900
	
358500
	
Sam 56
	
6/25/2009
	
4234 Vta.
	
3106
	
COPIAPO
	
300
	
300
SECOND AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE
AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
 th
     Contingency Date
 Entire Agreement
 Counterparts
 Remainder of page intentionally left blank




---



##### 



SELLER:
    West Oahu Mall Associates, LLC,
A Hawaii limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ Joseph DaneshgarName:
    Joseph DaneshgarTitle:BUYER:
    TNP AQUISITIONS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ Steve CoreaName:
    Steve Corea




---



##### 



CONSENT OF ESCROW HOLDER
  DATED:
    
    
    
    
    
    TITLE GUARANTY ESCROW SERVICES, INC
(Escrow Holder)By:Its:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 38

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit remote 
 voting in meetings of committees and subcommittees and to require the 
chair of a committee or subcommittee to recognize members at a meeting 
   of the committee or subcommittee in the order in which they seek 
                              recognition.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2023

 Mr. Donalds submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit remote 
 voting in meetings of committees and subcommittees and to require the 
chair of a committee or subcommittee to recognize members at a meeting 
   of the committee or subcommittee in the order in which they seek 
                              recognition.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING REMOTE VOTING IN COMMITTEES.

    Clause 2(f) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``proxy'' and inserting 
        ``proxy or remote'';
            (2) by striking ``(f)'' and inserting ``(f)(1)''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) A vote by a member of a committee or subcommittee with 
respect to any measure or matter may not be taken remotely.''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF MEMBERS DURING MEETINGS OF COMMITTEES.

    Clause 2 of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives is 
amended by adding the following:
    ``(q) During a meeting of a committee or subcommittee, the chair 
shall recognize members in the order in which they seek recognition.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Last, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 599]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered May 1, 1998, convicting him of insurance- fraud in the third degree (two counts), conspiracy in the fifth degree, and falsely reporting an incident in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Williams,*84 NY2d 925, 926).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Dismissed and M emorandum Opinion filed August 8 , 2017

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00467- CR

RISPAH CHOMBAH, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 9

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2151521

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant entered a plea of guilty to trespass. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to six days’ confinement in county jail. We dismiss the appeal.
The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports2

the certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2864

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jess Tyler Johnson, also known as Jess Tylor Johnson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

 ____________

 Submitted: January 5, 2024

Filed: January 10, 2024 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jess Johnson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he

pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and

1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for

the Southern District of Iowa.
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

sentence. Johnson has filed a pro se brief restating counsel’s arguments.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court correctly determined

that Johnson was a career offender and correctly calculated his Guidelines range. See

United States v. Turner, 781 F.3d 374, 393 (8th Cir. 2015) (construction and

application of Guidelines are reviewed de novo). We also conclude that the court did

not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence, as it properly considered the

factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. 

See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc)

(reviewing sentences for substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse-ofdiscretion standard; abuse of discretion occurs when the court fails to consider

relevant factor, gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or

commits a clear error of judgment in weighing the appropriate factors). Further, the

court imposed a sentence below the Guidelines range. See United States v.

McCauley, 715 F.3d 1119, 1127 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that when the district court

has varied below the Guidelines range, it is “nearly inconceivable” that the court

abused its discretion in not varying further).

We further conclude that Johnson failed to show the district court judge was

unprepared or biased. See United States v. Waters, 799 F.3d 964, 975 (8th Cir. 2015)

(this court presumes district court adequately considered written and oral arguments

presented by defendant); United States v. Oaks, 606 F.3d 530, 536-37 (8th Cir. 2010)

(judge is presumed impartial, and party seeking disqualification bears substantial

burden of proving otherwise). We decline to address in this direct appeal Johnson’s

claim that counsel was ineffective. See United States v. Hernandez, 281 F.3d 746,

749 (8th Cir. 2002) (generally, ineffective-assistance claim is not cognizable on direct

appeal).

-2-
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we

affirm the judgement, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-3-
**EXHIBIT
      32**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
      and
      (b) of


Section
      1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Asia Global Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A #1 for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
      2007
      (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Asia Global Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Asia Global Holdings Corp.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Date:August 20, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Michael MakMichael
                Mak, President and
              Chief
                Executive Officer




Date:
                August 20, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Michael MakMichael
                Mak, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Art Dimensions, Inc.(the Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I. Kathy Sheehan, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated:
March 31, 2010





Art
      Dimensions, Inc.By:
            /s/ Kathy
      SheehanKathy
      Sheehan
              Chief
      Financial Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 222 

Expressing support for approximately doubling funding for Federal career 

and technical education programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2023 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for approximately doubling funding for 

Federal career and technical education programs. 

Whereas, for many Americans, this post-COVID economic 

boom is an opportunity to reskill and upskill, with American workers changing jobs and even professions in historic numbers; 

Whereas the landscape of the 21st century economy is changing, as emerging new technologies and shifting demands 

create new opportunities and challenges; 

Whereas there remains a crucial and unaddressed need to 

train the workforce of this new economy; 

Whereas now is the time to invest in American workers, as 

the tremendous economic energy of the post-COVID recovery presents an unparalleled opportunity to retrain 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 222 IH 

and realign the American workforce for the new economy, 

while also providing American workers with the necessary 

skills to earn higher wages and attain long-term job security; and 

Whereas the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.), as reauthorized by the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act (‘‘Perkins V’’), is the primary Federal law developing and supporting career and 

technical education programs in secondary and postsecondary education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) affirms the importance of the Carl D. Per3 kins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 

4 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) and other career and tech5 nical education programs for training the skilled 

6 workforce of the future and for increasing the earn7 ing potential and job security of American workers; 

8 (2) recognizes that the authorized annual fund9 ing for the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical 

10 Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.), 

11 amounting to $1,299,883,892 in fiscal year 2023, is 

12 insufficient to address the need brought on by the 

13 long-term economic realignment and the near-term 

14 COVID–19 pandemic; and 

15 (3) urges the Committee on Education and the 

16 Workforce to authorize $13,000,000,000 in new 

17 spending for programs under the Carl D. Perkins 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 222 IH 

1 Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 

2 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) and innovative evidence-based 

3 career and technical education over the next 10 

4 years, equaling approximately double the amount 

5 currently authorized by Congress to such programs. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Monique RANSOM, Appellant.

WD 80936

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: October 30, 2018

Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent

Jeannie M. Willibey, for Appellant

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Monique Ransom was found guilty of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action, both under a theory of accomplice liability, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Ransom appeals, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting certain evidence and plainly erred by failing to properly instruct the jury. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).
Reno L. WHITT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106786

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: May 7, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Amy E. Lowe, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

Reno Whitt, Jr. ("Movant") appeals the motion court's denial of his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2015) amended motion for postconviction relief. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred because he was convicted of tampering in the first degree and trial counsel failed to offer a jury instruction on tampering in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.

We affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b)(2) (2018).