alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40047

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR REYES-PASCUAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. L:03-CR-1267-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor ReyesPascual concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by

circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. 

The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing

an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 35 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 35

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require continued 
  broadcasting of the full House Chamber during legislative business 
   consistent with the broadcasts that occured on January 3-6, 2023.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2023

Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Frost, Mr. Bowman, Ms. Bush, Ms. Castor of 
 Florida, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, 
 Mr. Huffman, Ms. Jacobs, Ms. Tokuda, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Ms. Jayapal, 
 Mr. Kim of New Jersey, Mr. Lieu, Ms. Meng, Mr. Moskowitz, Mr. Nadler, 
  Mr. Payne, Mr. Takano, Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Watson Coleman, and Mrs. 
Dingell) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require continued 
  broadcasting of the full House Chamber during legislative business 
   consistent with the broadcasts that occured on January 3-6, 2023.

    Resolved, That clause 2(a) of rule V of the Rules of the House of 
Represenatives is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``The recording and broadcasting performed pursuant to this clause 
shall ensure the possible coverage of floor proceedings that are least 
as transparent as the broadcasts that occured on January 3-6, 2023, at 
the beginning of the 118th Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
Daniel S. BARNETT and Abovo Corporation, Petitioner, v. Richard B. SCHIRO, Respondent

No. 18-0278

Supreme Court of Texas.

OPINION DELIVERED: April 26, 2019

Daniel D. Tostrud, Lindsey K. Wyrick, Katherine K. Elrich, for Respondent.

Charles W. McGarry, Robert M. 'Bob' Clark, for Petitioners.

Ben Taylor, for Amicus Curiae Sharon Redd, Robert Maurice Charvoz, Jr., and Carletta Guillory.

PER CURIAM

The sole issue presented in this case is whether the evidence offered by the prevailing party was sufficient to support the reasonable attorney's fees awarded pursuant to section 38.001 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. In *Rohrmoos Venture v. UTSW DVA Healthcare, LLP* , 578 S.W.3d 469 (Tex. 2019), we clarified *74the legal and evidentiary requirements for shifting attorney's fees from the prevailing party to the non-prevailing party. *Id.* at ----.

Here, attorney Richard Schiro represented Daniel Barnett and his individual retirement account (IRA) as defendants in a suit brought in 2011 by Kirtland Realty Group. Kirtland and Barnett, as well as Kirtland and Barnett's IRA, ultimately reached settlement agreements. Schiro then brought a suit for unpaid legal fees against Barnett for $183,673. The jury awarded that same amount to Schiro, which is unchallenged and is not the subject of this appeal.

In addition to the unpaid legal fees, Schiro requested "reasonable attorneys' fees and costs" pursuant to section 38.001 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. After hearing expert testimony about the reasonableness and necessity of the attorney's fees, the jury awarded attorney's fees of $131,786.11 for trial and contingent appellate awards if Barnett unsuccessfully appealed to the court of appeals or this Court. Barnett filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, asserting that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the section 38.001 fee award. The trial court denied the motion and entered judgment in favor of Schiro. The court of appeals affirmed. --- S.W.3d ----, ----, 2018 WL 329772 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2018) (mem. op.).

In *Rohrmoos Venture* , we explained the prevailing party's evidentiary burden and the standard for shifting reasonable and necessary attorney's fees to the non-prevailing party. 578 S.W.3d at ----. Having clarified the law governing the award of attorney's fees, we reverse the court of appeals' judgment affirming the award of attorney's fees and, without hearing oral argument, we remand the case to the trial court for a redetermination of attorney's fees consistent with our decision in *Rohrmoos Venture* . *See* TEX. R. APP. P. 59.1.
EXHIBIT
4.1
 
 
 RenaissanceRe
Holdings, Ltd.
 Renaissance
Other Investments Holdings II Ltd.
 Renaissance
House
 8-12 East
Broadway
 Pembroke
HM 19
 Bermuda
   October
23, 2008
  Platinum
Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
 The
Belvedere Building
 69 Pitts
Bay Road
 Hamilton
HM 08
 Bermuda
 
 ASSIGNMENT
 AND
 ASSUMPTION
AGREEMENT
  Ladies
and Gentlemen:
  Reference
is made to the Transfer Restrictions, Registration Rights and Standstill
Agreement dated November 1, 2002 as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
December 5, 2005 (as so amended, the “Agreement”) between Platinum Underwriters
Holdings, Ltd., a Bermuda company (the “Company”), and RenaissanceRe Holdings,
Ltd., a Bermuda company (“Purchaser”).  All capitalized terms used but
not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the
Agreement.
  Purchaser
proposes to assign the RenRe Option and the Agreement to its wholly owned
subsidiary Renaissance Other Investments Holdings II Ltd., a Bermuda Company
(“Holdings”).  In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and
agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:
  (i)           Pursuant
to Section 9 of the Agreement, the Company hereby consents to the assignment of
the Agreement by Purchaser to Holdings.
  (ii)           Purchaser
hereby assigns, and Holdings hereby assumes, the rights and obligations of
Purchaser under the Agreement, provided, however, that, in
accordance with Section 9 of the Agreement, such assignment and assumption
shall not relieve Purchaser of its obligations under the Agreement.
  (iii)           References
to “Purchaser” in the Agreement shall hereinafter be deemed to refer to both
Purchaser and Holdings.  For the avoidance of doubt, the assignment by
Purchaser to Holdings of the RenRe Option and the Agreement shall not result in
the termination of the Agreement, and the Agreement shall terminate pursuant to
Section 13(b) thereof if neither Purchaser nor Holdings owns the RenRe Option or
any RenRe Option Shares.
  Subject
to the foregoing, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect pursuant
to its terms.
  If you
are in agreement with the foregoing, please sign the accompanying copy of this
letter and return it to Purchaser and Holdings, whereupon this letter shall be a
binding agreement among Purchaser, Holdings and the Company.
  - 1
-
  Very
truly yours,
 
 RENAISSANCERE
HOLDINGS, LTD.
  /s/ Fred R. Donner
 
 
 
 /s/ Mark A. Wilcox
 
 Accepted
and agreed as of the
 date
first written above:
 
 PLATINUM
UNDERWRITERS HOLDINGS, LTD.
 /s/ Michael E. Lombardozzi  
   - 2
-
|  | 1.  | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K Amendment No. 3 for the year ending March 31,      2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2.  | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K Amendment No. 3      for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Jack Jie Qin                                |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jack      Jie Qin                                    |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer, President and Chairman |
|   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                   |

----
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Walter Reid
Green, Jr., as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green,
  Jr.Walter
      Reid Green, Jr.Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:  November 16,
      2009








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7884

MARTIN RAY BYLER, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. REGGIE WEISNER, Captain, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Thomas David Schroeder, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00864-TDS-RAE)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Hilton Johnson, Jr., GRAY JOHNSON BLACKMON LEE & LAWSON, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorneys General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Martin Ray Byler seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.

Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Byler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Byler’s motion for bail pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# memo

The ECA Incineration Testing Program: Laboratory

- Scale Incineration Testing of Fluoropolymers was completed on October 30, 2009. The final study report associated with this effort consisted of about 3,900 pages of main report body pages and the associated supp orting appendices. The central conclusion of this study was that Phase II combustion testing of Fluoropolymer Composites 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the laboratory

- scale thermal reactor system determined that waste incineration of fluoropolymers does

not emit detectable levels of PFOA under conditions representative of typical municipal waste combustor operations in the U.S. Based on this testing, waste incineration of fluoropolymers is not expected to be a source
of PFOA in the environment.

Both Phase I an d Phase II testing described in the Final Study Report were performed in accordance with the requirements of the Enforcable Consent Agreement (ECA) and the TSCA GLPs as embodied in the EPA

- approved Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs). Upon review of t he report and appendices, EPA did find eight areas that required additional technical clarification from the test sponsors. These areas have been discussed with Philip Taylor, the Study Director, and Robert Giraud, the Technical Projec t Manager/Facility M anagement. To: Nhan Nguyen , RAD Branch Chief

From: Joe Avcin, RAD Staff

Date: 1/30/2015

Re: Close

- Out of Technical Matters associated with the ECA Incineration Testing Program: Laboratory

- Scale Incineration Testing of Fluoropolymers

# memo

Satisfactory responses to Area #1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 ha ve been obtained. These topics and th eir responses are detailed in the file “ Responses to EPA Review of Fluoropolymers Final Study Report .pdf.”

The following areas remain open at the time o f the writing of this memo pending a response from Robert Giraud:

Area #3

– O

- ring a soure of F?

Area #4

– CGA Concerns

Area #6

– Other Perfluorinated Compounds

The closure of these issues while important in providing technical completeness are not necessary in order to close

- out the study itself. Any potential outcome of these issues would not alter the conclusions of the study. Reponses to these open matters a re expected within the first half of 2015. These responses will be documented as appropriate when they are
received.
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B)
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





In
connection with the Annual Report of Golden Green Enterprises Limited (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Mingwang Lu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and results of
operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.





/s/ Mingwang LuName:
                  Mingwang
      LuTitle:
                  Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
                  July
      15, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of this Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David Hagan, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boingo Wireless, Inc.; and

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ David   Hagan                                   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David   Hagan                                       |   |
|   | Chairman   of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | (Principal   Executive Officer)                     |   |
|   |                                                |   |
| Date:  | July 20,   2018                                |   |

 

----
### Comments on the PGP for EPA

Mapp, Dale

to:

Jack Faulk

01/25/2010 04:30 PM

Cc:

"Dean, Glenda", "Clark, Darby", "S mith, Katie R", "Leach, Jennifer M", "Stearns, Brad", "Warren, Lee"

Show Details

Good afternoon Jack.

Attached please find comments on EPA's PGP from the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.

Should you have any questions about our comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks for all of you help during the conference last week in Dallas.



## D ale P. Mapp, Chief

Construction Stormwater/G eneral Permit Section

N PDES Permit Branch

Water Division

ADEM

(334) 394-4399

dpm@adem.state.al.us

Mission: Assure for all citizens of the State a safe, healthful and productive environment 

### Page 1 of 1

5/13/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\ j faulk\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web0841.htm
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Link Media Publishing Ltd..(the "Company") on 10Q SB for the period ending August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mario Aiello, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|1 | . | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|- | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  |   |                                                                                                                                                                
|2 | . | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.



Date: October 14, 2003



**/s/** Mario Aiello   Chief Financial Officer 
    (Title)


---
No. 85-1768.

#### Reale *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 518 

Pushing back against the labeling of attempts by parents to ensure school 

curriculum and sports are age and sex appropriate as extreme. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2023 

Mrs. MCCLAIN (for herself, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BABIN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, 

Mr. SELF, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, and Mr. WEBSTER of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Pushing back against the labeling of attempts by parents 

to ensure school curriculum and sports are age and sex 

appropriate as extreme. 

Whereas all students should feel welcome in their classroom, 

but radical far-left ideas inappropriate for minors should 

not; 

Whereas it is not extreme or hateful to believe children as 

young as 6 should not be subject to discussion about sexual orientation or gender ideology in the classroom; 

Whereas it is not extreme or hateful to believe biological men 

should not compete against biological women in sports; 

Whereas, while issues dealing with the history of slavery and 

racism should be taught in the classroom, courses cenVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:22 Jun 15, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR518.IH HR518

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 518 IH 

tered around the false belief that America is systemically, 

structurally, or institutionally racist should not; 

Whereas it is not extreme or hateful to believe that parents, 

not the government, should have the final say in their 

children’s education; and 

Whereas attempts to express these views in a violent manner 

are inexcusable: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports parents having a say in their 

3 child’s education; and 

4 (2) opposes— 

5 (A) allowing biological boys and men to 

6 compete in biological girls and women’s sports; 

7 (B) the weakening of title IX protections; 

8 and 

9 (C) labeling parents as extreme and hate10 ful for wanting to keep inappropriate material 

11 out of their child’s classroom. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB