alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

                                 Certifications
                                 --------------

I, Susan Parker, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of e-Book
Network, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of e-Book
Movie Network, Inc., as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report.

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared.

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

         6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: July 29, 2003.


/s/ Susan Parker
--------------------------
President, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and
Principal Accounting Officer
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,545-01

IN RE MICHAEL F ERNANDEZ , Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. C14-00391 IN THE 384 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM EL P ASO COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 384 District Court of El Paso County , that more than 35 day s have elapsed , and that the

t h application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional f a c ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of El Paso County , is or dere d to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s co rp u s i n El Paso County

. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was
serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitted with the response. T his application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: January

7, 2015 Do not publish
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00452-CR

Dimetric Dashon GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR9594

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED September 30, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Grow Condos, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Commission on April 24, 2018 (the "Annual Report"), I, Wayne A. Zallen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report as filed on April 24, 2018, and as amended on April 25, 2018, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  April 25, 2018  /s/ Wayne A. ZallenWayne A. ZallenChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2395

Lower Tribunal No. 2017DP-000153

_____________________________

In the Interest of D.L.B., a child.

D.B.,

Appellant, 

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM OFFICE,

Appellees.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Kelly P. Butz, Judge.

January 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, NARDELLA and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Amanda Peterson, of Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum, Appellate Counsel, of Children’s Legal Services, West Palm 

Beach, for Appellee, Department of Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria 

Glass, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, of the Statewide Guardian ad Litem 

Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Kyle MELADY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3521

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### The County Court of Greenbrier County *et al. v.*The Bank of Williamsburg *et al.*

(No. 7814)

Submitted March 7, 1934.

Decided March 13, 1934.

*704*Jarrett <& Wilson,*for appellants.

*Conley & Klostermeyer,*for appellees.

Litz, Judge :

The object of this suit is to establish a preference in favor of a county as creditor of an insolvent bank. To the ruling of the trial court sustaining demurrers to the bill of the county court of Greenbrier County and the petition of John H. Boling, sheriff, this appeal is prosecuted.

The bill alleges that the state commissioner of banking on January 2, 1932, closed defendant Bank of Williamsburg and thereafter appointed E. L. Morrison receiver to administer its *assets;*that at the time it was closed, the bank owed the state $1220.28 and Greenbrier County $21,838.54, for undistributed tax collections deposited therein by the sheriff as ex officio treasurer of the county; that there was on deposit in the bank July 1, 1931, county funds amounting to $15,348.03, and on August 1, 1931, $12,578.00; that the bank was designated, August 4, 1931, as a depository of the county for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1931, and ending July 1, 1932; that' the bond required of the bank as such depository was executed September 28th, approved by the prosecuting attorney September 29th, and accepted by the county court October 6,1931; that by reason of the failure of the county court to designate the bank as a county depository on or before June 30, 1931, and of the bank to execute bond on or before August 1st, succeeding, as required by Code 1931, 7-6-1, 2, the bank was not a legal depository and the public moneys deposited or remaining on deposit after July 1, 1931, constitute a trust fund in the hands of the receiver.

As the controversy may involve the validity of the bond executed by the bank as a depository for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1931, and ending July 1, 1932, and the liability of the sureties on its bond for the previous year, the sureties on each bond should be made parties to the suit. Generally, all persons whose interests may be adversely *705affected thereby should be made parties to a suit iu chancery. *Finance Co.*v. *Window Glass Co.,*86 W. Va. 322, 103 S. E. 333.

The decree of the circuit court, dismissing the bill, will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

*Reversed and remanded.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 17, 2014

Order 

Clerk

January 17, 2014

146724(101)

LaFONTAINE SALINE, INC., d/b/a

LaFONTAINE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE

RAM,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 146724

v COA: 307148

Washtenaw CC: 10-001329-CZ

CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

IHS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC, d/b/a/

CHRYSLER JEEP OF ANN ARBOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant IHS Automotive 

Group, LLC, to extend the time to file its reply brief is GRANTED. The reply brief will 

be accepted as timely filed if filed on or before February 10, 2014.
Matthew FARR and Katie Farr, Respondents, v. Keith STROUD and Althea Stroud, Appellants.

No. ED 106692

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, NORTHERN DIVISION.

Filed: May 7, 2019 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 11, 2019 Application for Transfer Denied September 3, 2019

FOR APPELLANTS: Keith Stroud, Acting Pro Se, Althea Stroud, Acting Pro Se.

FOR RESPONDENTS: Chelsea Hoffman, 105 East Lafayette St., Monticello, MO 63457.

Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Keith Stroud and Althea Stroud, acting pro se, appeal the judgment entered after a bench trial in favor of Matthew Farr and Katie Farr ("Landlords") as to Landlords' claim for unlawful detainer. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*261The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124

Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). "An arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion is one 'founded on prejudice or preference rather than on reason,' (defining 'arbitrary), or "contrary to the evidence or established rules of law" (defining 'capricious). State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Nev. „ 267 P.3d 777, 780 (2011) (quoting Black's Law Dictionary 119, 239 (9th ed. 2009)). And, "WTI the context of a writ petition, this court gives deference to the district court's findings of fact." Williams v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Nev. „ 262 P.3d 360, 365 (2011). It is within this court's sole discretion to determine if a writ petition will be considered. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the petition and the supplement to the petition, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; Pan, 120 Nev. at 229, 88 P.3d at 844; see also NRAP 21(b). The district court's written findings of fact and conclusions of law reflect the exercise of discretion, not its abuse. While we are sensitive to the time pressures under which the parties have proceeded, we note that petitioner failed to provide this court with an appendix supporting the factual assertions made in its writ petition, NRAP 21(a)(4), and petitioner failed to cite to any evidence that the district court acted arbitrarily or capriciously. Because petitioner has

...continued prohibition is available to arrest proceedings of a district court when such proceedings are in excess of the district court's jurisdiction).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947APafraguirre J.

Saitta failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that extraordinary writ relief is warranted here, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 2

cc: Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division Clark County District Attorney Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division William L. Wolfbrandt, Jr. Lisa M. Kent Eighth District Court Clerk

2 In light of this order, we deny petitioner's motion to file a supplement to its stay motion, or in the alternative, to file a response to the real parties in interest's oppositions to the stay. This court entered a temporary stay of the child's release to real party in interest Carnell Duhon, which expires by its own terms at noon on Monday, July 28, 2014. Accordingly, no further action is necessary by this court.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3

(0) I947A
Order entered June 12, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00755-CR

EX PARTE BENJAMIN BURCH

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-00319-Q

ORDER

The Court has received appellant’s notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying 

his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus raising a double jeopardy challenge. Although 

the trial court issued its order on March 28, 2014 and the notice of appeal was filed on April 10, 

2014, the notice of appeal was not forwarded to this Court until June 10, 2014. This is an 

accelerated appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31.

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in the appeal by 

JUNE 30, 2014. In addition to the documents related to the habeas corpus proceedings, the 

clerk’s record shall contain the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. 

We ORDER Marissa Garza, official court reporter of the 204th Judicial District Court, to 

file, by JUNE 30, 2014, the reporter’s records of all hearings related to appellant’s application 

for writ of habeas corpus. 
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by JULY 18, 2014. We ORDER the State to file 

its brief by AUGUST 8, 2014. If any party does not file its brief by the date specified, the 

appeal will be submitted without that party’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1.

The appeal will be submitted without oral argument on September 4, 2014 to a panel 

consisting of Justices O’Neill, Lang-Miers, and Brown.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Lena Levario, Presiding Judge, 204th Judicial District Court; Marissa Garza, official 

court reporter, 204th Judicial District Court; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; 

and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**J. ROE BUCKLEY / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, J. Roe Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of MewbourneEnergy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Report”) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section. 

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, James E. Hogue, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wiltex A, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport.
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in the quarterly report fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:
     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”), and
     c. Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
     a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.     By: /s/ JAMES E. HOGUE    James E. Hogue  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)   Date: February 10, 2004
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI)

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 17, 2011 between AISI, DOT and EPA 

and included the following individuals:

AISI: Ron Krupitzer and David Anderson

DOT: Coralie Cooper

EPA: Byron Bunker, Allen Duncan, Mary Walsh, Tony Fernandez, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused primarily on potential opportunities for weight reductions in medium and 

heavy duty vehicles through the use of high strength steel. Materials were provided to the 

agencies which are also included in the docket.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Stuart B. Brown    
|                     |  |  |  | Stuart B. Brown        
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
July 26, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with American Pub lic Power Association (APPA)

Attendees :

See attached.

Discussion :

A general discussion of the Mercury and Air Toxi cs Standards was held along with the attached.
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of NuVim,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  quarterly  period  ended  September  30,  2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"),
I, Richard P. Kundrat, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2007

/s/Richard P. Kundrat
-------------------------
Richard P. Kundrat
Chief Executive Officer