02/ie/20 n 15:5 7 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S 0001/01 8

•'':lOPEaATIOl^ S DEPARTM E 

# •DECEIVE D N TO F TRANSPORTAT.C^/\R||y| Q OQCKE T Federa l Aviatio n AdrnirnStraTior T Cynthi o Dominik , Laur a Ponto . Lolony a Williams . Pe-te rLync h Complainant s M & R Helicopters , LLC .

_Responden t V . Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket : 2010-121 1 CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I HEREB YCERTIF Ytha tI hav e thi s da yserve d th e foregoin g entrie(s) : MOTIO N FO R PROTECTIV E ORDE R C~.AIN3H\ G .r^

E ;".^NCAV£\:A: . CA—i r^"A w.^ ^ MOTIO N T O DISMIS S RECURREN TFAILIN G T O MEE TFILIN G DEADLINES- 4 MOR E MOTIO N FO R MOR E DEFINIT E STATEMEN T DEPOSITIO N O F CYNTHI ADOMINI K MOTIO N FO R DEFINIT E REQUESTE D DISCOVER Y RESPONDENT S REPL

YT O COMPLAINANT S OPPOSITIO N FO R DEPOSITIO N O F CYNTHI ADOMINI KAN D NE WMATTE R f ^ a^G'^ U 

### r^Hc' i f F 

### F 2-&-- I• >-G - I f 

### :L-^C- W 

## a-7-« (

upo n oi l portie s o frecor d i n thi s proceeding , i n accordanc e wit h th e requirement s o tRul e 2 9 pursuon tt o 2 8 U . S . C . § 1746 . -Service b yfirst-das s moil , postao e preooid , addresse d as follows : Federo l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , 5 W Wilbu rWrigh tAvenue-Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D.C . 205

VI Att : Hearin g Docke tClerk , AGC-43 0 FA X20 2 49 3 514 2 Laur a Porilo , Esq . Enforcemen tDivision/AGC-30 0 Offic e o fth e Chie fCounse l F AA 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 FA X20 2 26 7 510 6 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yode r U S Departmen to fTransportatio n Offic e o fI'learings , M-20 . Roo m E l 2-32 0 1200 No wJerseyAvenue . S.E , Washington , D C 2059 0 FA X20 2 36 6 753 6

# jvlie[f i By : Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC , 281 6 0refieldRoQ d Allentown , Po . 18104 61 0 36 0 395 3 ^ ^—j ^ Dote : Ell _02/1G/201 1 15;5 7 FA X 202483514 2 FA A + DM S 1^002/01 !

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI-H . 281 6 0refieldRoa d Allentown , PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Laur a Ponto , Lalony a William s CompiGinont s M i R Helicopters , LLC , Responden t Docket : 2010-121 1 FA ACase : No : 2009SO95043 4

MOTIO N FOR DEFINITE REQUESTE D DISCOVER Y AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (inoperativ e sinc e 2009 ) whon n over s an d file s tt^e followin g MOTIO N FOR Definit e Requeste d Discoverydu e t o insufficienc yan d failur e t o produc e prio rrequeste d DiSCOVER Yi n accordanc e t o Rul e 13.220(d) . 1 . Connplainant s pleadin g entitle d Connplainant s Reques tfo rDiscovery receive d b yresponden to n Januar y31 , 201 1 request s discover yitem s t o b e reiterate d agai n an d receive d i n 3 0 day s o rMorct i 2 , 2011 . 2 . Sinc e M s William s revise d he rallegation s tha tther e v^il l b e n o violation s i n regar d t o th e regulatio n chang e tha toccurre d i n February2004 , 

### 1 o f 302/18/201 1 15:5 7 FA X202493514 2 FA A* OM S 2)003/01 8

requirin g al l A& P mechanic s t o b e o n a compan yspecifi cdru g progra m an d ne wdefinitio n o femployer , th e specifi cdate s an d wordin g o fth e ol d an d ne w regulation s wil l no tb e neede d a tthi s time . 4 . I fth e abov e statemen ti s incorrec tthe n th e abov e need s t o b e produced . 5 . M s William s faile d t o produc e th e exac tspecifi cregulations , languag e a s th e basi s o fhe rviolation . Sh e ma yproduc e the m a tthi s time . 4 I n th e lette ro fOctobe r27 , 2010 , responden trequeste d full , unaltere d copie s o fdocument s tha twer e produce d i n th e incomplet e investigatio n file , tha twer e eithe rstricken , blocke d out , redacte d o rspoliated . Responden t no w request s unaltere d an d non-spoliate d document s produce d i n th e EI R file . 5 . I fa n non-spoliate d an d corrupte d EI R fil e canno tb e produce d the n th e exac treference s a s t o ho wspoliatio n an d redactio n o fth e record s o r disclosur e restriction s is allowe d need s t o b e specificall yreference d accordin g t o th e cite d Jordo n vDepartmen to fJustic e tha tM s Pont o cite d i n he rprio r correspondence . 6 . Depositio n o fM s Domini k a s previousl yrequested . 7 . Depositio n o fM s William s a s previousl yrequested . 8 . Productio n o fal l certifie d mai l retur n receip trequested , particularl y thos e o fth e origina l servic e o fth e civi l penalty . WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray s tha t thi s Honorobl e Cour twil l mandat e th e 2 o f302/16/201 1 15:5 7 FAX202493514 2 FA A• > DMS @i004/01 8

follov/In g discover yunde rRul e 13.22 0 (d) . Respectfull ySubmitted , 

# ,^y h Michoe l B . Selig , MD . FACC . « ^ , _, /7^"l V Dat e * -

3 o f302/1B/201 1 15:5 7 FA X 202493514 2 FA A * DM S @|005/01 8

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC . 281 6 0refieldRoa d Allentown , PA . 1810 4 

## .AKir4 G DOCKE T

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Cynthi a Dominik , Laur a Ponto , Latony a William s Complainant s M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Federa l Doclcet . No : 2010-121 1

MOTIO N FO R MOR E DEFINITE STATEMEN T DEPOSITIO N O F CYNTHI ADOMIN K AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG . MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g Motio n fo rMor e Definit e Statemen tconcernin g Depositio n o f Cynthi a Dominik , Esq . unde rRul e §13.22 5 fo ra pr e trio l examinatio n a tGallaghe r Reporting , Allentown , P A18101 . 1 . Throughou tthi s litigation , complainant s hav e faile d t o plea d o r addres s specifi cenumerate d allegations . Th e purpos e o fthes e practice s is t o confin e th e pleadin g part yproo ft o onl ythos e act s olleged , thu s enablin g a



### 1 of 302/16/201 1 15:5 7 FA X 202493514 2 FAA* DM S Bl'^'^^/Ol i

respondin g part yt o prepar e thei rdefense ^ B yfailur e t o addres s th e specifi c pleading s an d thereb yignoring , evadin g an d circumventin g respondent' s specifi callegations , complainant s hav e indubitabl yan d injuriousl ypropagate d redundan tan d iterat e pleading s fo ra cos e tha tappeare d voi d a b initio . 2 . B yfailur e t o addres s a pleading , tha tthe n deem s tha tallegatio n a n admissio n o fth e trut h t o tha tpleadin g unde r§ 13.208(f) . 3 . Throughou tthi s litigation , i tappear s tha t complainant s d o no t eve n rea d th e conten tmatte ro fth e pleading s b yrespondent , respondin g onl yt o th e captio n subjec ttitl e an d thereb ypleatin g fact s wit h insufficien tspecificit yan d i n breac h t o standar d practices . 4 . I n prio rpleading s responden tsuggeste d alternatively , tha tM s Domini k ca n submi ta writte n statemen to rstipulatio n i n orde rt o voi d th e nee d fo rdepositio n o fM s Donimi k that : o . sh e indee d calle d th e respondent . b . sh e di d stat e tha tth e complainant s woul d b e unabl e t o submi twithi n th e timeframe . c . a continuanc e wa s requeste d o n th e respondent . 5 . As usua l ther e ha s bee n n o respons e an d therei n wa s ignored , evade d an d circumvente d requirin g complainant s t o directl yrespond , answe r an d fil e statement s t o thes e allegations .

'Bake rvRanges , 32 4 A.2 d 498 . 50 5 (P a Supe rCt . 197 4 2 o f302/16/201 1 15:5 7 FA X202493514 2 FA A+ DM S lg|007/01 8

WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twil l requir e th e complainant s t o fil e direc tdefinit e statement s t o th e abov e propose d statement s o ffoot . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC . yVtO V Dat e 

# V

3 o f302/16/201 1 15:5 7 FA X 202493514 2 FA A DM S

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC . 281 6 0refiel d Roa d Allentown , PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , DC . 21008/01 8

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Cynthi a Dominik , Laura Ponto , Latony a William s Complainant s V . M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Federa l Docket . No : 2010-121 1

RESPONDENTS REPL

YT O COMPLAINANT S OPPOSITIO N FO R DEPOSITIO N O F CYNTHI ADOMINI KAN D NE WMATTE R AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operationa ) sinc e 2007 ) who m a\^er s an d file s th e followin g Repl yt o Complainant s Oppositio n t o Depos e Cynthi a Dominik , Esq . unde rRul e §13.22 5 fo rpr e tria l examinatio n a t Gallaghe rReporting , Allentown , P

A18101 . 1 . Throughou tthi s litigation , complainant s hav e faile d t o plea d an d addres s specifi cenumerate d allegations . Th e inten to fthes e practice s Is t o confin e th e pleadin g part yproo ft o onl ythos e act s alleged , thereb yenablin g

1 o f402/16/201 1 15:5 8 FAX202493514 2 FA A^ DM S ^,^^^^.^21 .

th e respondin g part yt o prepar e thei rdefense' . B yfailur e t o addres s th e specifi c pleadin g an d thereb yignoring , evadin g an d circumventin g th e respondent s allege d allegations , complainant s ar e indubitabl yan d injuriousl ypropagating , iterat e an d superfluou s pleading s fo ra cas e tha tappeare d voi d a b initio , 2 . Inactio n t o addres s a pleading , suggest s a n admissio n o fth e trut h t o tha tpleadin g unde r§ 13.206(f) . 3 . Throughou tthi s lega l action , i tappear s tha t complainant s hav e no t rea d th e conten tmatte ro fth e pleading s b yrespondent , respondin g onl yt o th e captio n subjec ttitl e an d thereb ypleatin g fact s wit h vague , conclusionary , confusin g i n natur e an d wit h insufficien tspecificit ytherei n breachin g standar d practices . 4 . O n Novembe r30 , 2010 , respondent s Motio n t o Strik e Alleaatio n wa s faxe d an d sen tt o M s Ponto' s departmen tt o whic h n o objectio n o ranswe rwa s receive d withi n th e 1 0 da ydeadlin e unde r§ Rul e 13.218(d) . Alat e answe rwa s als o provide d i n th e collaborativ e correspondenc e receive d o n Decembe r13 , 2010 . 7 . M s Pont o faile d t o presen t an yrequeste d evidenc e a s t o whe n th e respons e wa s actuall yreceive d i n he rrespons e t o thi s matter . Asubjectiv e dat e wa s indicate d o n th e documen titsel fa s t o whe n i twa s drafted , doe s no t represen ta n actua l dat e o fservic e o rsigne d authorizatio n o freceipt . 8 . M s Domini k

o fth e FA

Aenforcemen tdivisio n o fth e chie fcounse l 'Baker vRanges , 32 4 A.2 d498 . 50 5 (Pa SuperCt . 197 4 2 O f 4rft A+ DMS 0)010/01 3 02/16/201 1 15:5 6 FAX202493514 2 FA AUM b e i

calle d responden tdirectl yt o hi s persona l cel l phon e admittin g tha tth e complainant s coul d no tfil e response s withi n th e 1 0 da ydeadlin e period , woul d b e i n breac h o fthi s regulatio n an d thereb yrequeste d a continuanc e directl yt o respondent . Prio rExhibi tshowe d cal l lo g o frespondent' s cel l telephon e showin g M s Dominik' s numbe r202-267-7560 . 9 . Responden trefuse d a continuanc e an d requeste d th e cas e b e dismisse d o n thes e grounds . 10 . M s Ponto' s defens e is tha tsh e neve rfile d a forma l continuance , knowin g tha tresponden talread ydenie d he rverba l reques ti n th e telephon e inquir yb yM s Dominik . 11 . A tn o tim e di d M s Pont o address , respon d o radmi tt o thi s statemen t o ffac twit h submitte d proof , a s ha s bee n he rpractic e t o ignore , evad e an d circumven titem s no tconvenien tt o addres s o rshe d ligh ti n a manne rtha tma y revea l th e tru e facts . 12 . Furthe rpre-tria l examinatio n o fM s Domini k shoul d b e required , sinc e sh e intervene d i n thi s matter . 13 . Responden tis a solo , privat e practic e cardiologis tan d require s tha t th e pre-tria l depositio n o fM s Domini k t o b e hel d at : Gallaghe rReportin g an d Video , LLC . 160 0 Lehig h Parkwa yEast , Sui t 1 H Allentown , P

A1810 3 a s t o no taffec thi s clinica l responsibilities , pos e inconvenienc e o rdelay s t o hi s neutra l part ypatients , i n servin g th e communit yo rpu thi m a tundu e risk fo r 3 o f402/16/201 1 15:5 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A^ DM S \^0^^/0^ B

liabilit yo rmalpractice . 14 . Complainant s prio rsubmitte d date s ca n b e utilize d fo rthi s deposition . NEWMAnE R 15 . Alternatively , M s Donini k ca n submi ta writte n statemen to r stipulatio n that ; a . sh e indee d calle d th e respondent . b . sh e di d stat e tha tth e complainant s woul d b e unabl e t o submi twithi n th e timeframe . c . sh e requeste d a continuanc e fro m th e respondent . WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour t wil l gran t th e pre tria l depositio n o fM s Domini k a tth e Allentown , P

Alocatio n i fsh e choose s t o no t submi ta writte n statemen to ffac tt o th e abov e cal l an d discussion . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC . Dat e 

# yi^- W

4 o f402/16/201 1 15:5 8 FAX202493514 2 FA A • > DM S a012/01 8

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H 281 6 Orefiel d Roa d Allentown , PA . 1810 4 

# RECEIVE D Ftt. ' 

### 1 5 2o n 

# HEARIN G DOCKE T U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Laur a Ponto , Latony a William s Complainant s M 4 R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket : 2010-121 1

MOTIO N T

O DISMIS S RECURREN

TFAILIN G T

O MEE TFILIN G DEADLINES-4 MOR E AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g Motio n T o Dismiss du e t o recurren tan d repeate d lat e filin g an d objectiv e disclosur e o ffilin g withi n deadlines . 1 . I tis respondent' s avermen t tha tther e ha s bee n a plethor a o f procedura l defect s b ycomplainant s i n thi s cas e bu tn o judgmen tha s bee n take n o n an yo fth e claims . 2 . Ther e ar e no w4 additiona l Motion s fo rDefinit e Statement s faxe d t o 102/16/201 1 15:5 8 FAX202493514 2 FA A• * DMS @1013/01 8

complainant s o n Januar y24 , 201 1 tha tremai n unanswere d pas tth e filin g deadlines . 3 . Th e du e dat e fo rrespons e wa s February3 , 2011 . 3 . Thes e Motion s fo rDefinit e Statement s wer e require d du e t o complainant s failur e t o addres s i n an ymanner , severa l item s repeatedl y directe d t o them , tha tthe yignored , evade d o rcircumvented . WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twil l dismis s thi s cas e a s ther e i s abundanc e t o procedura l defect s t o selec tfrom , validatin g dismissin g thi s case , tha tha s gon e astray , i n th e spiri to fjudicia l econom yan d justice . Respectfull ySubmitted , , . Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC . ^ Dat e02/16/201 1 15:5 8 FA X202493514 2 FA A * DM S §1014/01 !

Michoe l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H 281 6 Orefiel d Roa d Allentown , PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , 0,C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Laur a Ponto , Latony a William s Complainant s M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docltet : 2010-121 1

MOTIO N FO R PROTECTIVE ORDE R CHANGIN G TH E FUNDAMENTA LCAUS E O F ACTIO N AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g Motio n fo ra Protectiv e Orde rt o fi xan d freez e th e complainant s continua l movin g targe to fth e premis e an d caus e o factio n fo r thi s propose d civi l penalt ya s i tha s becom e a movin g targe tfro m th e origina l claim s se i fort h i n M s William s lO P 9 record . I . Th e complainant s hav e admitte d t o formall yreleasin g th e prio r Mechanic/I Afoun d t o b e o n hi s ful l tim e employer s Drug/Alcoho l progra m b y M s William s lette ro fSeptembe r23 , 201 0 an d furthe rconfirme d i n revise d lette ro f 102/16/201 1 15:5 8 FAX202493514 2 FA A* DMS @]015/01 8

Januar y21 , 2011 . 2 . Thi s releas e pertaine d a s wel l t o claim s tha tfh e Mechanic/I Awa s no t o n a drug/alcoho l monitorin g progra m specificall yunde rMR H o rprio rt o MR H usin g hi m t o perfor m hi s services . 3 . M s William s wa s unwillin g t o affir m tha tMrBake rwa s o n a monitorin g program , sinc e hi s plac e o femploymen twa s no tnearb yt o visi ta s sh e di d fo r th e othe rmechanic/lA . 4 . Th e sol e an d primar ypremis e fo rthi s violatio n the n shifte d a s documente d i n M s William s Inspecto rStatemen tlO P 9 record , t o M s William s inabilit yt o validat e an yFA Aapprove d dru g an d alcoho l testin g progra m informatio n fo rMrBaker . 5 . M s William s wa s give n evidenc e tha t M rBake rwa s o n a progra m prio r an d during , bu tchos e no tt o pursu e primar ysourc e verificatio n and/o r confirmatio n o fthes e fact s pursuan tt o §13.224 , befor e sh e rushe d t o judgmen t t o finaliz e he rviolatio n s o tha ti twoul d b e entere d jus tunde rth e deadline , onl yon e da yprio rt o th e 2 yea rstatut e o flimitations . 6 . I n M s William s rus h t o judgmen tan d pus h t o ge the rpropose d civi l penalt yentere d b yth e ski n o fth e teet h an d jus tunde rth e wir e fo rth e statut e o f limitations , sh e faile d t o realiz e tha tth e allege d violation s cite d b y complainants , wer e performe d b yMrBaker , afte rMR H terminate d operation s an d wa s n o longe rperformin g flight s fo rhuma n facto rreason s affectin g th e singl e pilo toperato ri n goo d fait h an d i n complianc e with :02/16/201 1 15:5 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A+ DM S @101G/01 8

119.6 9 Managemen t

Personne lRequire dfo r Operation s Conducte dunde r

Par t 13 5 of ttii s Chapter , (a) DR Helicopters , LL

C mus t hav esufficien

t qualified management

an dtechnica

lpersonnelt

o ensurethesafety o f it s operations . DRHelicopters . LLC mus t hav equalified personne lservin g i

nthefollowing o r

equivalent

positions ; (1 ) Director

o f Operations . (2 ) Chief

Pilot . (3 ) Director o f Maintenance . Responden twa s th e Directo ro fOperations , Chie f(only ) Pilo tan d th e Maintenanc e Schedule rdu e t o th e huma n factor s o fa litigiou s divorce , suicid e ris k o fa mino rchild , custod ybattle , tim e an d responsibilit yrestraint s o fhi s cardiolog ypractice , responden t i n goo d judgmen t an d i n accordanc e t o th e abov e regulation , stoppe d operations . 7 . Onc e M s William s confirme d tha tMrBake rwa s continuousl y(withou t break ) o n a nnonitorin g progra m unde rhi s disclose d ful l tim e employer , sh e the n agai n shifte d tti e basi s o fth e yiolatio n t o M rBake rno tbein g o n MRH s ow n companie s monitorin g program , despit e alread yreleasin g th e othe r Mechanic/I Afo rth e sam e exac tcoun to fthos e regulation s tha twer e no t evident , disclosed , o reve n know n b ya prio rFA ADrug/Alcoho l auditor , M r Vincen tRoots , MRH s FA Aoperation s an d maintenanc e inspector s o rth e Allentow n FSDO manager . 8 . M s William s agai n shifte d an d re-crafte d he rmovin g targe tallege d yiolatio n i n he rlette ro fJanuar y21 , 201 1 wit h lega l inconsistenc yan d breac h judicia l estoppel s b ystatin g tha tMR H di d no tdetermin e tha tM rBake rwa s o n a n FA Adru g an d alcoho l progra m prio rt o usin g hi s services , whic h wa s afte r - 3 -02/16/201 1 15:5 8 FA X202493514 2 FA A• > DMS gl017/01 8

MR H ha d alread yshu tdow n operations . 9 . Th e sam e exac tsam e cas e scenari o pertain s t o th e Mechanic/I A who m M s William s release d o n al l count s du e t o insufficien t evidence . 10 . Th e sann e insufficien tevidenc e als o follow s sui ta s i tapplie s t o M r Balce ra s h e als o wa s o n a progra m prio rt o performin g service s fo rMRtt . 11 . I n addition , ther e wer e severa l factor s concernin g th e ambiguit y regardin g disclosur e o fregulations , regulation s tha twer e no t cleari ycontained , listed , spelle d ou to ri n a forthrigh tmanne reviden twithi n th e signe d of f complianc e statemen tan d operationa l specifications , thereb yhidden , conceale d an d encouragin g violation , rathe rtha n effectiv e complianc e I n th e spiri to fsafety . 12 . Ther e wer e severa l factor s concernin g unclea ran d dispute d interpretatio n o fth e languag e an d meanin g containe d withi n th e signe d of f complianc e statemen tan d operationa l specifications , thereb yencouragin g violation , rathe rtha n effectiv e complianc e i n th e spiri to fsafet yan d contrar yt o standar d practice s i n Administratio n low .

I n Administrativ e La w"/ n th e interpretafio n o fih e languag e o fregulations , wher e doub texists a s t o th e inten to fth e meanin g o fth e languag e writte n an d enacte d b ya governin g body , th e languag e shal l b e interprete d i n favo ro fth e Part yan d agains tan yimplie d extensio n o fo restriction" . 13 . B ywa yo fJudicia l Estoppel s an d t o b e legall yconsistent , complainant s shoul d follo wsui tb yreleasin g E d Bake rwh o wa s als o o n hi s ful l 4 -02/16/201 1 15:5 9 FAX202493514 2 FA A* DMS @018/01 8

tim e employer' s drug/alcoho l progra m prio ran d during , jus ta s th e mechanic/I A wa s formall yrelease d fro m thos e violations , thereb yvoidin g th e legitimac yo f th e complaint . WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twil l gran t freez e an d fi xth e movin g targe to fchangin g claims , cause s o factio n an d allegatio n violations , a s is no tpermissibl e unde rcommo n rule s o fcivi l procedures . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H \ . ^ 

### Dat e 0 ^