Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A2033. BILLY RAY BLACK v. THE STATE.

In 2007, a jury convicted BillyRayBlack of aggravated child molestation (Count

1) and child molestation (Count 2). The trial court sentenced Black to: 30 years on

Count 1, with 15 years in confinement and 15 years on probation; and 20 years on

Count 2, with 10 years in confinement and 10 years on probation, to be served

consecutively to Count 1. We affirmed Black’s convictions on direct appeal. See

Black v. State, 305 Ga. App. 903 (700 SE2d 892) (2010).

In 2016, Black filed several motions to correct a void or illegal sentence. He

contended that the trial court: failed to impose a split-sentence consisting of both

probation and imprisonment; improperly imposed a consecutive sentence; failed to

merge Count 1 with Count 2;and failed to instruct the jury regarding a lesser-included

offense. The trial court dismissed Black’s motions, and this appeal followed. We,

however, lack jurisdiction.

A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a

void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact,

void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217, n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009);Burg v. State,

297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void sentence

generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the

conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that

sentence, most typically because it exceeds the mostsevere punishment for which the

applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748

SE2d 446) (2013). When a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment, it is

not void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).

July 18, 2018
Here, Black’s sentence was within the statutory range of punishment. See

OCGA § 16-6-4 (d) (1) (2005)

1

(“A person convicted of the offense of aggravated

child molestation shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than ten nor more

than 30 years.”); OCGA § 16-6-4 (b) (2005) (“A person convicted of a first offense of

child molestation shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more

than 20 years.”). The trial court also complied with the mandatory minimum

requirements as set forth in OCGA § 17-10-6.1 (2005), and the trial court was

empowered to impose a consecutive sentence. See Jefferson v. State, 209 Ga. App.

859, 863 (3) (434 SE2d 814) (1993) (“It is within the trial court’s discretion to sentence

consecutively.”); OCGA § 17-10-10 (a).

Finally, Black’s arguments regarding merger and jury instructions are a

challenge to his conviction, not his sentence, and thus do not state a valid void

sentence claim. See Williams v. State, 287Ga. 192, 193-194 (695 SE2d 244) (2010) (a

claim of failure to merge a conviction as amatter of fact is a challenge to a defendant’s

conviction and not a valid void-sentence claim). Because Black has not raised a valid

void-sentence claim, we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal. See Harper, 286 Ga.

at 218 (2). Moreover, to the extent that Black’s motion could be construed as seeking

to vacate or modify his convictions, “a petition to vacate or modify a judgment of

conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case,” id. at 218 (1), and any

appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed, see id.

at 218 (2);see also Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010).

1 Black was subject to the 2005 versions of these statutes at the time he

committed the offenses. Additionally, the split-sentence requirement of OCGA § 17-

10-6.2 was not yet in effect. However, even if it was, the trial court imposed a split

sentence consisting of both probation and imprisonment.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, this appeal is herebyDISMISSEDfor

lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/18/2018