alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 53 (Friday, March 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11979-11980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-305; NRC-2009-0125]


 Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has 
granted the request of Dominion Energy Kewaunee (the licensee) to 
withdraw its September 14, 2007 application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License No. DPR-43 for Kewaunee Power Station 
located in Kewaunee County, Wisconsin.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical 
Specification (TS) requirements related to control room envelope 
habitability. The proposed changes include revisions to the control 
room post-accident recirculation system, the instrument operating 
conditions for isolation functions, and a control room envelope 
habitability program. The changes are consistent with TS Task Force 
(TSTF) Change Traveler, TSTF-448-A, Revision 3, ``Control Room 
Habitability.''
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on November 20, 
2007 (72 FR 65363). However, by letter dated December 17, 2008, the 
licensee withdrew the application for the proposed amendment.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated September 14, 2007, and the licensee's 
letter dated December 17, 2008, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, 
at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint 
North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible 
electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management 
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the 
NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons who do not 
have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the 
documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff 
by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4948096ca9681978b91968781a48a9687ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c2c382e722e392f33292e3f391c322e3f723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of March, 2009.


[[Page 11980]]


    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Peter S. Tam,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III-1, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E9-6104 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Maria Beecham HILL, Appellant, v. WHMD NEUROSURGERY, LLC, and William F. Hoffman, M.D., Respondents.

No. ED 106331

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: February 5, 2019 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 12, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Donald L. Schlapprizzi, One Metropolitan Square, Suite 2430, St. Louis, Missouri 63102.

For Respondent: James P. Reinert, Timothy F. McCurdy, 222 South Central Avenue, Suite 500, St. Louis, Missouri 63105.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff Maria Beecham Hill ("Plaintiff") appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of Defendants William F. Hoffman, M.D. and WHMD Neurosurgery, LLC ("Defendants"), in a medical malpractice action arising out of an injury that occurred during surgery.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000973 17-JUN-2019 08:55 AM
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,480]


Tech Group, Van Buren, AR; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 4, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers of Tech 
Group, Van Buren, Arkansas.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6313 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 3.7**

**KEATING CAPITAL, INC.**

**AMENDMENT TO THE DIVIDEND REINVESTMENTPLAN**

**WHEREAS**, Keating Capital, Inc. (the “Corporation”) has previously adopted theKeating Capital, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”), which was amended and restated as of April 12, 2011; 

**WHEREAS**, the Company’s Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to adopt certain amendments to the Plan to eliminate the acquisition ofa fractional interest of a share of Common Stock of the Company under the Plan; 

**WHEREAS**, pursuant toSection 13 of the Plan, the Corporation may, at any time, amend or supplement the terms and conditions of the Plan, subject to the mailing of an appropriate written notice at least 30 days prior to the effective date of such amendment;

**NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED**, the Board of Directors does hereby adopt the following amendments tothe Plan: 

FIRST: The last sentence of Section 6 is hereby amended by deleting “and a checkfor any fractional share” at the end thereof. 

SECOND: The last three sentences of Section 7shall be deleted and replaced by the following: 

“The Plan Administrator will not acquire any fractionalinterest in a share of Common Stock of the Corporation under the Plan, and the Plan Administrator will pay any such fractional interest to the Participant in cash at the price per share determined under Section 3 with respect to suchdistribution.” 

THIRD: The fourth sentence of Section 12 is hereby amended by deleting“and a cash adjustment for any fractional share.” 

FOURTH: Except as set forth herein, allother sections of the Plan shall and do remain in full force and effect. 

FIFTH: The foregoingamendments to the Plan have been unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of the Company by written consent without a meeting on November 5, 2012. 

SIXTH: The foregoing amendments shall become effective pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan on the thirtieth day following the date the Corporation first provided written notice of suchamendments to Participants as required under Section 13 of the Plan. 

Dated: November 5, 2012
Exhibit 13.1(a)

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of KB Financial Group Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Yoon-Dae Euh                    
|                      |  |  |  | Yoon-Dae Euh                        
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to KB Financial Group Inc. and will be retained by KB Financial Group Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

Exhibit 13.1(b)

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of KB Financial Group Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2013 |  | /s/ Jong Kyoo Yoon     
|                      |  | Jong Kyoo Yoon         
|                      |  | Deputy President and   
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to KB Financial Group Inc. and will be retained by KB Financial Group Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1362

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KHALID J. KUBWEZA; LINDIWE N. KUBWEZA,

Parties in Interest - Appellants,

ONE FM RADIO TRANSMITTER BEARING A LABEL

STATING "BREWERS TWO-WAY RADIO"; ONE BLACK

BOX-LOW PASS FILTER; ONE REALISTIC MIXER,

MODEL NUMBER 32-1200B S/N 202255; ONE JVC TAPE

DECK, MODEL NUMBER TD-W354, S/N 093Y0175; ONE

OPTIMUS CD PLAYER, MODEL CD-7250, S/N

OL3617435MP; ONE ASTRON LS-10A POWER SUPPLY,

S/N 97070026; ASSORTED CABLES; ONE GEM SOUND

MIXER, MODEL NUMBER DS-9905, S/N 95110006;

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-99-737-3)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Khalid J. Kubweza, Lindiwe N. Kubweza, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney

Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Khalid J. and Lindiwe N. Kubweza appeal the district court’s

order granting the Government’s Complaint of Forfeiture. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. One FM Radio, No. CA-99-737-3

(E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
July 6 , 2015

Mr . Jonathan Van Drunen

Eagle Vision Productions, LLC

5168 Water Tower Road

Meridian, MS 39305

Dear Mr. Van Drunen:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your April 8 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0901 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, h ow it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional i nformation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any ques tions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,038]


Koch Originals, Inc., Evansville, IN; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 29, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of the workers at Koch Originals, Inc., 
Evansville, Indiana.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6520 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
|------------>

| From: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| To: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Cc: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Schwab, Margo"

<Margo_Schwab@omb.eop.gov>, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA |

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Date: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|08/03/2010 09:15 AM

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Subject: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|Speciation Language

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi,

This is the speciation language – the attachment shows where it would go in

the RICE rule.

“EPA assumes reduction in all species of fine particles have

equivalent health benefits, however it is important to point out

that there is significant uncertainty surrounding this assumption,

and to the extent that this rule largely reflects reductions in

only a couple of species of PM precursors, the estimates carry

significant degree of uncertainty.”

For the Cement preamble, it would need to be added somewhere around page 272,

with specific reference to sulfates. In addition, similar language is needed

for the first paragraph on page 67.

Regards,

Cortney

________________________________________________

Cortney Higgins

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.gov

(See attached file: RICE Benefits Discussion Preamble speciation

language.doc)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Anekwe, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 581]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the *500ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 24, 2002 *(People v Anekwe,*295 AD2d 621 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 29, 1999.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Krausman and Crane, JJ., concur.
CHARLESTON.

#### Clark *et al. v.*Bryan *et al.*

Decided November 17, 1900.

Circuit *Court*— Vacation *Order*— Non-appealable.

An *ex parte*vacation order made t>y a judge of the circuit court is non-appealable. (p. 271).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tucker County.

Bill by C. B. Clark and others against J. B. Bryan and others. From an order awarding an injunction appointing a receiver, defendants appeal.

*Dismissed.*

*W.*B. Maxwell and A. Jay YaleNTINE, for appellants.

CunNINGham StalliNgs, for appellees.

Dent, Judge:

This is an appeal improvidently awarded to an *ex parte*vacation order made by the judge of the circuit court of Tucker County awarding an injunction and appointing a receiver. The appellant has not yet made any appearance in the circuit court for any purpose, and according to the holding of this Court in the late case of *Brast*v. *Kanawha Oil Co. et ad.,*46 W. Va. 613, decided since the appeal herein was allowed, it must be dismissed, as the order from which it was taken, however erroneous, is non-appealable until a motion has been made in the lower court to correct it.

*Dismissed.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12435-12436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Third Meeting--RTCA Special Committee 217/EUROCAE WG 44--Airport 
Mapping Databases

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 217 meeting: Airport Mapping 
Databases.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 217 meeting: Airport Mapping 
Databases

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 18-20, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at AENA, Spanish Air Navigation 
Service Provide, Juan Ignacio Luca de Tena 14, Madrid, Spain, Contact: 
Javier Fenoll, Tel : (34) 91 321 54 61, Fax : (34) 91 321 31 57, 
Internet: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84eee2e1eaebe8e8c4e1a9e1fcf0e1f6eae5f7aae5e1eae5aae1f7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d0bab6b5bebfbcbc90b5fdb5a8a4b5a2beb1a3feb1b5beb1feb5a3">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,

[[Page 12436]]

Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 217 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

18 May

Opening Plenary (Chairmen's remarks and introductions, Review and 
approve meeting agenda)
Discussion
    <bullet> Schedule for this week
    <bullet> Schedule for next meetings
    <bullet> Action Items
Presentations
    <bullet> Taxi Graphic Demonstrations--Brian Gilbert
    <bullet> AENA Activities on eTOD--Javier Fenoll
Terrain, Obstacle, and Airport Mapping discussions
    <bullet> Discussion on AMDB and ICAO Recommendations

19 May

Terrain, Obstacle, and Airport Mapping discussions
Address Outcome from ``Roadmap Items'' (outcome from assigned actions)

20 May

Terrain, Obstacle, and Airport Mapping discussions
    Plenary Session
    <bullet> Other Business
    <bullet> Determine and agree on action plan
    <bullet> Meeting Plans and Dates.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 18, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-6459 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

|  | a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: | August 9, 2017 |  | By: | /s/ Roberto García-Rodríguez |  |
|-------|----------------|--|-----|----------------------------------------|--|
|       |                |  |     | Roberto García-Rodríguez     |  |
|       |                |  |     | President and Chief Executive Officer  |  |

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10039

Summary Calendar

BRANDY VAUGHN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE INCORPORATED,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

f

or the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17

- CV

- 2076

Before JO LLY , COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges

.

PER CURIAM: *

Affirmed. See Fifth Cir. R. 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH

C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

June 25, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk Case: 19-10039 Document: 00515009858 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/25/2019