alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council, May 18, 2009, 8:30 
a.m. to May 18, 2009, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Natcher 
Building, 45 Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/E2, Bethesda, MD, 20892 
which was published in the Federal Register on January 14, 2009, 74 FR 
2083.
    The full council will meet in closed session from 12:15 p.m. to 
1:15 p.m. to discuss changes in the ECB. This discussion will involve 
confidential material. Subcommittee meetings that were to start at 1 
p.m. will begin at 1:30 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the 
public.

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-6596 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*Hunter.

Submitted June 4, 1904.

Decided October 25, 1904.

1. *Jury*— Instruction—Error—Verdict.

When a jury returned into court, and announced that it had' agreed in a verdict, before it was read, the prisoner asked the-eourt to instruct the jury that it could find him guilty of murder in the first degree, and further find that he be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for life; but the court refused to do' so, because already during the trial, it had given that instruction. The refusal to repeat the instruction is not error, (p. 56).

Error to Circuit Court, Fayette County.

*108Ed. Hunter was convicted of murder and brings error.

*Affirmed.*

RyaN & RyaN and T. L. Sweeney, for plaintiff in error.

ATTORNEY GENERAL and C. W. 0SENTON, for tbe State.

BRANNON, Judge:

Ed. Hunter was sentenced by the criminal court of Fayette county to be hanged for the murder of John Bradicks by shooting’him, and obtained a writ of error from this Court.

One error assigned by him is that the court refused an in-étruction that after finding the prisoner guilty of murder in the first degree the jury could further find that he be confined in the penitentiary for life. The instruction was asked after the jury had returned into court and announced that -it had agreed in a verdict, but before it was read. The bill of exception states that the instruction was refused because the jury had already during the trial been instructed that they had a right to find the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree and to further find that he be confined in the penitentiary during the remainder of his life, and that it had been so stated to the jury by counsel several times during the trial. Instructions need not be repeated. *State*v. Prater, 52 W. Va. 132. Clearly the jury understood its powers as to this matter, and no injustice was done the accused.

Another assignment of error is, that a witness gave evidence of a declaration of the murdered man a minute or two after his shooting that Ed. Hunter shot him four times. There was no objection to this evidence, and no exception to it, and we need not'consider the point; but in fact the declaration was properly given in evidence, for the reason, first, that it was a.part of the *res gestae,*and second, Hunter was within hearing distance, and made no denial of that declaration. Third, there was much other evidence to prove Hunter the guilty agent. The evidence fully sustained the verdict. This Court cannot release Hunter from the terrible penalty of the gallows. The law, human and divine, says, “Ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murdered, which is guilty of death; but he shall surely be put to death.” Hunter must repay Bradick’s life with the loss of his own.

Judgment affirmed. *Affirmed.*
[No. 29658-6-II.

Division Two.

April 27, 2004.]

#### Patricia Beal, et al., *Appellants,*v. The Department of Social and Health Services, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 99-2-02186-7, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered November 22, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., concurred in by Bridge-water and Armstrong, JJ.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 538 

Expunging the December 18, 2019, impeachment of President Donald John 

Trump. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2023 

Ms. GREENE of Georgia (for herself and Ms. STEFANIK) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expunging the December 18, 2019, impeachment of 

President Donald John Trump. 

Whereas President Trump was wrongfully accused of misconduct in House Resolution 755, Impeaching Donald 

John Trump, President of the United States, for high 

crimes and misdemeanors, as demonstrated by the information revealed in an unclassified FD–1023 FBI document: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the December 18, 2019, impeachment 

2 of President Donald John Trump is expunged, as if such 

3 Articles had never passed the full House of Representa4 tives, as the facts and circumstances upon which such Ar5 ticles were based did not meet the burden of proving the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 538 IH 

1 commission of ‘‘high Crimes and Misdemeanors’’, as set 

2 forth in section 4 of article II of the Constitution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lu Feng, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that the annual report on Form 10-K of China Chemical Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Chemical Corp.





Dated: March 29, 2011
By:
/s/ Lu FengLu FengChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Influenza and Other Emerging Infectious Diseases 
in Vietnam; and Research and Public Health Practice on Influenza and 
Other Respiratory Infectious Diseases in the Middle East, Southeast 
Asia, and South American Regions, Funding Opportunity Announcement 
(FOA) IP09-002 and IP09-004

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., April 7, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of ``Influenza and Other Emerging 
Infectious Diseases in Vietnam; and Research and Public Health 
Practice on Influenza and Other Respiratory Infectious Diseases in 
the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and South American Regions, FOA 
IP09-002 and IP09-004.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.S., 
M.P.H., Office of the Director, Coordinating Center for Infectious 
Diseases, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E-60, Atlanta, GA 30333, 
Telephone: (404) 498-2275.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.


    Dated: March 13, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E9-6049 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit
10.47


 


[***] Confidential portions of this document have
been redacted and filed separately with the Commission.


 


Third Addendum to Master Services and License Agreement
between


Bridgepoint Education and eCollege.com


 


This Addendum (“Addendum”)
to the Master Services and License Agreement between Bridgepoint Education, Inc.  (“Customer”)
and eCollege.com (“eCollege”) for
the delivery of online courses, dated September 29, 2009 (the “Agreement”), is entered into effective as
of the 12th day of January, 2010.


 


WHEREAS, Customer and eCollege
previously entered into the Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend
the Agreement as more specifically set forth below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree
as follows:


 


1)             Services Credit.  eCollege hereby
authorizes Customer to use the [***] Services Credit allocated to Customer’s
second Contract Year (see Section 5 of Exhibit 2 to the Agreement),
during either the first or second Contract Years of the Agreement.


 


2)             Agreement
Terms Unchanged.  No terms or
conditions of the
Agreement, other than the amended terms set forth in this Addendum, are changed
by this Addendum.  Terms not defined
herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have entered into this Addendum effective upon the day first above
written. The persons executing this Addendum for and on behalf of the parties
hereto represent that they are fully authorized to do so for and on behalf of
their respective principals.


 


 




	
  eCollege.com

  	
   

  	
  Bridgepoint
  Education, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Matt Leavy

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Tom Ashbrook

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Matt Leavy, President

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Tom
  Ashbrook

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  SVP/CIO

  






 


	
  Addendum 
  090112

  	
   

  	
  eCollege Proprietary and Confidential

  



 


1
CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-
                                   OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles Fust, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SinoFresh HealthCare,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):


<PAGE>

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

November 13, 2003

/s/ Charles Fust
-----------------------
Charles Fust
Chief Executive Officer
SERVED: October 9, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

Ankitrarneshchandra Vyas 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0410 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

We do not anticipate reaching this case prior to January 2015. 

Unless specifically changed herein all prior orders remain in effect. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. On or before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after January 

9, 2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

Ankitrameshchandra Vyas, Respondent 

44040 Laurel Canyon Way 

Fremont, CA 94539 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

2300 East Devon A venue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FPCX: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0410 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
|   | 1. | We agree with the statements made in the first, third, fourth, fifth and seventh paragraphs |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Regarding the registrant's statement concerning the lack of internal control to prepare financial statements, included in the fifth paragraph, we had considered such matter in determining the nature, timing and extent of procedures performed in our audit of the registrant's 2009 and 2010 financial statements. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statements made in the rest of the document including that:  |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    | i. | The change was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors; and |
|--------------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | ii | During each of the two most recent fiscal years and through the date of their report, neither Ocean Rig UDW Inc, nor anyone on its behalf consulted with Ernst & Young (Hellas) Certified Auditors-Accountants S.A on any matter that was subject to disagreement, as that term is defined in Item 16.F of Form 20-F and the related instructions to Item 16.F of Form 20-F, or a reportable event, as that term is defined in Item 16.F of Form 20-F. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Gilbert T. GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81674

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: May 28, 2019

Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Julia E. Rives, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Two: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Gilbert T. Garcia appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Garcia argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that the plea court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation. Because Garcia's claim is not cognizable in a Rule 24.035 proceeding, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 4.8
 DeGolyer and MacNaughton
  st




---



##### 



Methodology and Procedures
     2




---



##### 



Definition of Reserves
  Proved oil and gas reserves
  3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



Developed oil and gas reserves
   Undeveloped oil and gas reserves 
     5




---



##### 



Primary Economic Assumptions
  Oil, Condensate, and Natural Gas Liquids Prices
  Natural Gas Prices
   6




---



##### 



Operating Expenses and Capital Costs
    Estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughtonNet Proved Reservesas ofDecember 31, 2010Oil and
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Natural
    
    
    OilCondensate
    
    
    NGL
    
    
    Gas
    
    
    Equivalent(MMbbl)
    
    
    (MMbbl)
    
    
    (MMcf)
    
    
    (MMboe)Proved Developed
    
    
    38.152
    
    
    
    1.564
    
    
    
    366,597
    
    
    
    100.816Proved Undeveloped
    
    
    12.766
    
    
    
    2.212
    
    
    
    362,371
    
    
    
    75.373Total Proved
    
    
    50.918
    
    
    
    3.776
    
    
    
    728,968
    
    
    
    176.189
 Note:
    
    Gas is converted to oil equivalent using a factor of 6,000 cubic feet of gas per 1 barrel of
oil equivalent. Extractive Industries  Oil and Gas (Topic 932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation
and Disclosures
  7




---



##### 



Submitted,/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughtonDeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON 
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716
 [SEAL]
    
    /s/ Thomas C. Pence, P.E.

Thomas C. Pence, P.E.Senior Vice PresidentDeGolyer and MacNaughton
  8




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATION
  1.
    
    That I am a Senior Vice President with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, which company did
prepare the report addressed to Petrobras Argentina S.A. dated January 10, 2011, and that
I, as Senior Vice President, was responsible for the preparation of this report.2.
    
    That I attended Texas A&M University, and that I graduated with a degree in Petroleum
Engineering in the year 1982; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of
Texas; that I am a member of the International Society of Petroleum Engineers; and that I
have in excess of 28 years of experience in the oil and gas reservoir studies and reserves
evaluations.
  9
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: August 25, 2016 107702

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATTHEW S. MAXWELL, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: August 18, 2016 Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

__________ G. Scott Walling, Schenectady, for appellant. J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Sara E. Fischer of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Aarons, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered January 16, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of assault in the second degree and escape in the first degree. Defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degreeand escape in the first degree in full satisfaction of a fourcount indictment, and his plea agreement included the waiver of the right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to the agreed-upon prison terms of five years on the assault conviction, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision, and 2 to 4 years on the escape conviction, the sentences to run consecutively. Defendant now appeals.-2- 107702

We affirm. Initially, we agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal was not valid, inasmuch as the record does not establish that defendant understood that the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the rights forfeited by a guilty plea (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). As such, his challenge to the severity of his sentences is properly before us. Nonetheless, our review of the record does not reveal an abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the agreed-upon sentences in the interest of justice (see People v Filion, 134 AD3d 1244, 1245 [2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 996 [2016]; People v Anderson, 129 AD3d 1385, 1385 [2015], lvs denied 26 NY3d 965 [2015]). Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court