June 18, 2015

 Exemption No. 11854

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0255

Mr. Peter B. Smith

Representative of Compass Light, Inc.

KestralPOV, LLC

411 Walnut Street, PMB 6717

Green Cove Springs, FL 32043

Dear Mr. Smith:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

By letter dated January 27, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Compass Light, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The 

exemption would allow the petitioner to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to 

conduct aerial photography for the motion picture and television industry for scripted closed 

set filming.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.
2

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the Cinestar X-8 HL, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 2, 

and DJI Phantom 3.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products 

and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates. In accordance with the statutory criteria 

provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in 

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft 

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from 

14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness 

Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is 

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection and closed set motion picture and 

filming. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material 

respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus 

Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 

11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the 

enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described 

by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of 

significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA 

good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701,

delegated to me by the Administrator, Compass Light, Inc. is granted an exemption from 

14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to 

the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection
3

and closed set motion picture and filming. This exemption is subject to the conditions and 

limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Compass Light, Inc. is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the Cinestar X-8 HL, 

DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 2, and DJI Phantom 3 when weighing less than 55 pounds 

including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new 

petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming 

are permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must 

be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 
4

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or 

revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the 

operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS 

Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or 

revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 
5

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 
6

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These 

documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 
7

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.
8

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
9

Project Officer: _______________

PETER B SMITH

KESTRALPOV LLC

411 WALNUT ST PMB 6717

GREEN COVE SPRINGS FL 32043
KestrelPOV, LLC. 

Peter B. Smith 

411 Walnut St., PMB 6717 

Green Cove Springs, FL 32043

(207) 542-5143 

peter@kestrelPOV.com

January 27, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform 

Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam: 

This petition for exemption is being filed by Peter Smith, of KestrelPOV, LLC., on 

behalf of Compass Light, Inc. (hereinafter "CL"), producer of TV and motion picture 

films. 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 

C.F.R. Part 11, CL, operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUASs”) 

equipped to conduct aerial photography for the motion picture and television industry 

for scripted closed set filming, hereby applies for an exemption from the listed 

Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its sUASs, so 

long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined 

herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

The conditions proposed by the applicant are drawn from Order 8900.1 CHG 0, 

Volume 3, Chapter 8-Issue a Certificate of Waiver for Motion Picture and Television 

Filming, AC 91-57, as well as existing exemptions for similar operations.

As described more fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation 

of small, unmanned and relatively inexpensive sUAS under controlled conditions in 

airspace that is 1) limited 2) predetermined 3) controlled as to access and 4) would 

provide safety enhancements to the already safe operations in the film and television 

industry presently using conventional aircraft. Approval of this exemption would 

thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA 

Administrator’s) responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of 

such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the Reform 

Act. 

1
The name and address of the applicant is: 

Compass Light, Inc. 

Attn: David Conover 

PO Box 1203 

Camden, ME 04843 

Ph: (207) 236-1203 

Email: dconover@compasslight.com 

website: www.compasslight.com 

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 CFR Part 21 

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) 

14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 

14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 

14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) 

14 C.F.R. 91.103 

14 C.F.R. 91.109 

14 C.F. R. 91.119 

14 C.F.R. 91.121 

14 CFR 91.151 (a) 

14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 

14 CFR 91.405 (a) 

14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 

14 CFR 409 (a) (2) 

14 CFR 417 (a) & (b) 

This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal in passing 

Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of 

Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate 

safely in the national airspace system (NAS) before completion of the rulemaking 

required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. In making this determination, the 

Secretary is required to determine which types of UASs do not create a hazard to 

users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to national security in light of the 

following: 

• The UAS’s size, weight, speed, and operational capability; 

• Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and 

• Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator. 

2
Reform Act § 333 (a). Lastly, if the Secretary determines that such vehicles “may 

operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish 

requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system.” 

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. 

This statutory authority by its terms includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is 

defined under §40101 of the Act, that includes sUASs, from the requirement that all 

civil aircraft must have a current airworthiness certificate. 

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation 

prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702-44716 of 

this title if the Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. 

§44701(f) See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203 (a) (1). 

CL’s sUASs are multi-rotor aircraft, weighting 55 or fewer lbs. including payload. They 

operate, under normal conditions at a speed of no more than 50 knots and have the 

capability to hover, and move in the vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. 

They will operate only in line of sight and will operate only within the sterile area 

described in the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual, (hereinafter “the 

Manual”). Such operations will insure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard to users 

of the national airspace system or the public.” 

Given the small size of the sUASs involved and the restricted sterile environment 

within which they will operate, the applicant falls squarely within that zone of safety 

(an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by 

exemption, allow commercial operations of UASs to commence immediately. Also 

due to the size of the UASs and the restricted areas in which the relevant sUASs will 

operate, approval of the application presents no national security issue. Given the 

clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the 

Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding 

the proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including enhanced 

safety, reduction in environmental impacts, including reduced emissions associated 

with allowing UASs for movie and television operations, the grant of the requested 

exemptions is in the public interest. 

3
AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY 

The applicant proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to civil aircraft that 

have the characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These 

limitations provide for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to 

operations under the current regulatory structure because the proposed operations 

represent a safety enhancement to the already safe movie and television filming 

operations conducted with conventional aircraft. 

These limitations and conditions to which CL agrees to be bound when conducting 

commercial operations under an FAA issued exemption include: 

1.The sUAS will weigh less than 55 lbs.

2. Flights will be operated within line of sight of a pilot and/or observer. 

3. Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be 30 minutes. Flights will 

be terminated at 25% battery power reserve should that occur prior to the 30 minute 

limit. 

4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGLpermission of 

the relevant FSDO, operations at closer range can be approved. 

12. The operator will submit a written Plan of Activities to the FSDO three days before 

the proposed shoot as required in the Manual. 

13. Pilot and observer will have been trained in operation of UAS generally and 

received up-to-date information on the particular UAS to be operated as required in 

the Manual. 

14. Observer and pilot will at all times be able to communicate by voice, either 

directly or via handheld VHF radios. 

15. Written and/or oral permission from the relevant property holders will be obtained. 

16. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county 

or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate 

governmental agencies. 

17. If the sUAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UAS will have 

capability to return to a pre-determined location within the Security Perimeter and 

land. 

18. The sUAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted 

obstacles or emergencies.

4
14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1) 

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements 

for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). 

Given the size and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by 

the Applicant, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an 

equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The 

Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both 

authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness 

certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and 

proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAS. In all cases, an 

analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an 

airworthiness certificate, in the restricted environment and under the conditions 

proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or 

rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and 

conditions proposed. 

The sUAS to be operated hereunder is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a 

pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and 

operates exclusively within a secured area as set out in the Manual. Unlike other civil 

aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by 

both the operator, pursuant to the Manual’s requirements, and under the requirements 

and in compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide security for the 

area of operation as is now done with conventional filming. The FAA will have 

advance notice of all operations. These safety enhancements, which already apply to 

civil aircraft operated in connection with motion picture and television production, 

provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional 

operations conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 

Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no 

credible threat to national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of 

operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, 

and inability to carry a substantial external load. 

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft 

The regulation requires: 

When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is 

displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft or experimental or 

provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near 

each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches 

nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," 

"experimental," or "provisional," as applicable. 

Even though the UAS will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be 

needed as the UAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which 

the word “Experimental” can be placed. Given the size of the sUAV, two-inch lettering 

will be impossible. The word “Experimental” will be placed on the fuselage in 

compliance with §45.29 (f). 

The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the sUAV marked on its 

5
fuselage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with 

the sUAV will see the identification of the UAS as “Experimental.” 

14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in 

Command. 

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. Because 

the UAS will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the 

equivalent level of safety of current operations by requiring the PIC operating the 

aircraft to have a private pilot’s license rather than a commercial pilot’s license to 

operate this small UAS. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and 

passengers, the sUAS is remotely controlled with no living thing on board. The area 

of operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights are planned and coordinated in 

advance as set forth in the Manual. The level of safety provided by the requirements 

included in the Manual is at least equivalent to that provided by a single individual 

holding a commercial pilot’s certificate operating a conventional aircraft. The risks 

associated with the operation of the sUAS are so diminished from the level of risk 

associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that 

allowing operations of the sUAS as requested with a private pilot as the PIC is at 

least equal to the present level of safety achieved by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b). 

14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness. 

The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in 

airworthy condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, 

should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for 

determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements 

contained in the Manual for maintenance and use of safety check lists prior to each 

flight, an equivalent level of safety will be provided. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft. 

Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides: 

No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft ... 

 (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this 

chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or 

Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any 

combination thereof.

The sUAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a 

flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because 

there is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. 

The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the 

ground control point where the pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to it. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight action 

6
This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to 

insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be 

provided for the aircraft an exemption will be needed. An equivalent level of safety 

will be provided as set forth in the Manual. The PIC will take all relevant actions 

including reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff 

distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight. 

14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight instruction: 

Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned 

free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully 

functioning dual controls. 

sUASs and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual 

controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that 

communicates with the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved 

exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of 

aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. The equivalent level of safety 

provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft 

and by the size, weight and speed of the aircraft.

14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum safe altitudes 

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 

(d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided 

the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for 

helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a sUAS that is a helicopter and the 

exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL, an exemption 

may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, except for the limited 

conditions stated in the Manual, the UAS will never operate at higher than 400 AGL. 

It will however be operated in a restricted area with security perimeter, where 

buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre-obtained 

consent.

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, and speed of 

the UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without 

the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice 

to the property owner and participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals 

will be aware of the planned flight operations as set forth in the Manual. Compared to 

flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55lbs. 

proposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these 

operations is far less than those presently presented with conventional aircraft 

operating at or below 500 AGL in the movie industry. In addition, the low-altitude 

operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between these small-UAS operations 

and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119. 

7
14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings 

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude 

by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or 

an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the sUAS may not 

have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may 

be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to 

the Manual and Preflight Check list, confirming the altitude readout of the sUAS is set 

to 0ft (QFE operations) on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under 

VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is 

enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising 

speed – (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to 

fly after that for at least 45 minutes.” 

The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 40 minutes of powered flight. 

To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, sUAS flights would 

be limited to approximately 10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the UAS’s 

proposed flight area and the location of its proposed operations within a 

predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in daylight or night VFR conditions 

is reasonable.

Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope 

of prior exemptions. Operating the small UAS, in a tightly controlled area where only 

people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will 

be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of 

risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the 

small UAS. Additionally, limiting sUAS flights to 10 minutes would greatly reduce the 

utility for which the exemption will be granted.

Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights 

to 30 minutes or 25% of battery power whichever happens first. This restriction would 

be more than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from 

anywhere in its limited operating area.

8
14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and 

Registration 

The regulation provides in pertinent part: 

(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it 

has within it the 

following: 

 (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . .

(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required 

by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under 

§91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to 

passengers or crew. 

The UAS fully loaded weighs no more than 55 lbs and is operated without an onboard 

pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration 

documents or to display them on the sUAS. 

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the 

ground control point where the pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to 

them, to the extent they are applicable to the sUAS. 

14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance 

Inspections 

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft 

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required 

inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies 

repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or 

maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. 

Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness 

certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be 

accomplished by the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook 

as referenced in the Manual.(See Sections L and Q) An equivalent level of safety will 

be achieved because these small UASs are very limited in size and will carry a small 

payload and operate only in restricted areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical 

issues arise the UAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 

400 feet AGL. As provided in the Manual, the operator will ensure that the UAS is in 

working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log 

of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar 

with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to 

provide the equivalent level of safety. 

------------------------------------------------------------------- 

9
Summary

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in 

the Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed: 

Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules: 

14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b);14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113( a) & (b);91.7 (a); 

91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) and (b); 91.405 

(a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate 

commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55lbs or less) in motion picture and 

television operations. 

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUASs in the film industry 

will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional film operations, using jet or piston 

power aircraft, operate at extremely low altitudes just feet from the subject being 

filmed and in extreme proximity to people and structures; and present the risks 

associated with vehicles that weigh in the neighborhood of 4,000lbs., carrying large 

amounts of jet A or other fuel (140 gallons for jet helicopters shown below). Such 

aircraft must fly to and from the film location. In contrast, a sUAS weighing fewer than 

55 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced 

mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS is carried to the film 

set and not flown. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not 

expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights. 

The operation of small UASs, weighting less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict 

conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the 

grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the 

requirements of Part 21 and allowing commercial operations. 

These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, and in a sterile 

environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted 

with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and people.

Privacy 

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property 

owner’s prior consent and knowledge. Filming will be of people who have also 

consented to being filmed or otherwise have agreed to be in the area where filming 

will take place. 

Safety Culture 

By adhering to established best practices, and utilizing procedures from modern Risk 

Management programs, such as TEM/CRM and SMS, Compass Light's operations 

will provide at least an equivalent level of safety to existing FAR's, and further will 

help promote and spread a robust safety culture in the nascent commercial sUAS/

civilian UAV industry. 

10
Background 

While some arguments in this petition might suggest that Commercial Pilot skills 

and ratings are not required, or wholly relevant to, commercial sUAS operations, 

as an ATP rated, Part 121 airline employed (28yrs), commercial helicopter pilot, 

and A&P mechanic, I believe my background is a significant factor that underlies 

my ability to bring a professional approach to all manner of aviation, manned or 

unmanned. 

Though the physical dexterity may be different, nearly all other areas of sUAS 

operations fall under the same basic rules of risk management and aeronautical 

decision making that typify everything from air taxi, SAR, Part 121, and GA 

operations. 

If granted, this exemption will allow Compass Light and me, together, to bring 

those skills and experience to sUAS operations, thereby enhancing safety for the 

industry, and for the public in general. 

Sincerely, 

Peter Smith 

KestrelPOV, LLC. 

peter@kestrelPOV.com