alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jeffery C.
      Swank, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Jeffery C. Swank


Jeffery
      C. Swank


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


Date:  November
      13, 2007








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMMED AL-QAHTANI,

Petitioner,

v.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, Jr., et al.,

Respondents.

Case No. 05-CV-1971 (PLF)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

Respond to Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Petitioner’s Motion to Compel 

Examination by a Mixed Medical Commission, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion 

is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his response by no later than February 19, 2021. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __January 22, 2021______ ________/s/___________________ 

HON. PAUL L. FRIEDMAN 

Senior United States District Judge
exv10w34






EXHIBIT 10.34









April 2, 2009




Lewis R. Belote, III

86 Sunset Ridge Lane

Santa Rosa Beach, FL 32459




     Re: Employment Agreement



Dear Lew:




     This letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) amends and modifies the terms of the employment
agreement entered into between you and Move, Inc. (f/k/a Homestore.com, Inc.) dated March 6, 2002
(the “Employment Agreement”) as follows.


The following language shall be added to the end of Section 8(b) of the Employment Agreement:





“During the period in which you receive the Cash Severance, you shall be entitled to also
receive the benefits set forth in Section 4(d) of this agreement. In addition, in the event
of your Involuntary Termination, Termination for Death or Disability, or Termination without
Cause, subject to your execution (or the execution by your executor or personal
representative in the case of your death) of the acknowledgment and release attached as
Exhibit A, and your continued cooperation with the Company as directed by the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company up to such termination, all Company stock options granted
to you shall be exercisable for a period of three (3) years after the final payment of the
Cash Severance; provided, however, that the Options described in Section 5 of this agreement
shall be exercisable until their expiration as set forth in Section 5.”



     Except as specifically stated in this Letter Agreement, all of the terms and conditions of the
Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. Any capitalized terms not defined herein are
as defined in the Employment Agreement.



 









 





     Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing terms by signing and returning this Letter
Agreement to me.



     Thank you.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Best regards,

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Steven Berkowitz
 	 
	 	 	Steven Berkowitz, CEO 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Lewis R. Belote, III
 	 
	 	 	Lewis R. Belote, III
EX-10(EE)



 





Exhibit 10(ee)




FOURTH AMENDMENT TO




THE KEITHLEY INSTRUMENTS, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL DEFERRAL PLAN

Dated September 1, 1999




     FOURTH AMENDMENT, dated as of December 10, 2007 (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the Keithley
Instruments, Inc. Supplemental Deferral Plan dated as of September 1, 1999 (the “Plan”).
Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in
the Plan.



     1. Amendments. The Plan is hereby amended as follows:



          (a) By deleting the definition of “Minimum Eligible Compensation Level” in the Definition
section of the Plan in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following “Minimum Eligible
Compensation Level” definition:




          “Minimum Eligible Compensation Level. For the Plan Year starting January 1, 2008,
Compensation of at least $120,000 as determined for the preceding Calendar Year.”




     2. General.



          (a) Except as expressly amended hereby, the provisions of the Plan are and shall remain in
full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	KEITHLEY INSTRUMENTS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Mark J. Plush
 	 
	 	Name:  	Mark J. Plush 	 	 
	 	Title:  	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# Phantom 2 Specifications

General Features  

### Ready to Fl y, Multifunctional Quad - rotor Sy stem  

### Customized H3 - 2D and H3 - 3D Gimbal Support  

### Precision Flight and Stable Hovering  

### 25min Flight Time & Smart Battery  

### Auto Return - to - Home & Landing  

### Advanced Power Management  

### Intelligent Orientation Control (IOC)  

### Easy Battery Replacement  

### Self - tightening Propeller  

### Video Downlink Support  

### CAN - Bus Expansion Module

Aircraft WEIGHT (BATTERY & PROPELLERS INCLUDED) 1000g HOVER ACCURACY (READ Y TO FLY) Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m MAX YAW ANGULAR VELOCITY 200°/s MAX TILT ANGLE 35° MAX ASCENT / DESCENT SPEED Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s MAX FLIGHT SPEED 15m /s(Not Recommended) DIAGONAL LENGTH 350mm **FLIGHT TIME** 25mins

# Phantom 2 Specifications **TAKE -**  **OFF WEIGHT** ≤1300g **OPERATING TEMPERATUR E** 

- 10°C ~ 50°C **SUPPORTED BATTERY** DJI Smart Battery
DJI Smart Battery **TYPE** 3S LiPo **CAPACITY** 5200mAh, 11.1V **CHARGING ENVIRONMENT RANGE**  0 °C to 40 °C **DISCHARGING ENVIRONM ENT RANGE** 

- 20 °C to 50 °C

2.4GHz Remote Control **OPERATING FREQUENCY** 2.4GHz ISM **COMMUNICATION DISTANCE (OPEN AREA)**  1000m **RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (1%PER)** 

- 97dBm **WORKING CURRENT/VOLT AGE**  120 mA@3.7V **BUILT -**  **IN LIPO BATTERY WORK ING CURRENT/CAPACITY**  3.7V, 2000mAh
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10138 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BRIAN POERCE LOGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-180-2-T

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM: ** Court-appointed counsel for Brian Poerce Logan has filed a motion and brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Logan has filed a pro se supplemental brief and motion for appointment of counsel in response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and the pro se submissions discloses no nonfrivolous issue.No. 98-10138 -2- Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, Logan’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05196

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05196\05196_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05196\05196_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

05196\Certification Statement Plant ID 05196.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05196\05196_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05196\05196_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

LUIS ARMANDO CRUZ

- GALVAN, a.k.a.

Armando, a.k.a. Luis Armando Cruz, a.k.a.

Panda, a.k.a. Kung Fu Panda,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 15

- 10227

D.C. No. 2:13

- cr

- 01709

- GMS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2 0 17 **

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Luis Armando Cruz

- Galvan appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty

- plea convictions and 121

- month concurrent sentence s for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana , in v iolation of 21 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 10227

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(vii), and 846, and conspiracy to launder monetary

instruments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1)(A)(i), (h). Pursuant to Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cruz

- Galvan ’s counsel has filed a brief stating

that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. Cruz

- Galvan has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has

been filed.

Cruz

- Galvan waived his right to appeal his conviction

, sentence

, and the

order of forfeiture

. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.

Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the

waiver. See United States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We

acc ordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
December 2, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with National Rural Electri c Cooperative Association (NRECA)

Attendees :

Kirk Johnson, National Rural Elec tric Cooperative Association Ted Cromwell, National Rural Elec tric Cooperative Association John Novak, National Rural Elect ric Cooperative Association Ellen Kurlansky, EPA/OAR/OAA/OPAR Joe Goffman, EPA/OAR/OAA/OPMO Joel Beauvais, EPA/OGC/IO Kellie Ortega, EPA/OECA/OCE/AED Eric Schaeffer, Environmental Integrity Project Leah Kelly, Environmen tal Integrity Project Stephen Brick, consultant to E nvironmental Integrity Project

Discussion :

A general discussion was held of the comments submitted by National Rural Electric Cooperative Association on the proposed Me rcury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), specifically about the MATS time compliance time frame.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  ------------

RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Daniel Baker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Xtrasafe, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: December 31, 2009

/s/ Daniel Baker
----------------
Daniel Baker
Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EGLISE BAPTIS T E BETHANIE DE FT. LAUDERDALE, INC.
, Appellant,

v.

AIDA AUGUSTE and USLANDE AUGUSTE
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 2537

[ April 14, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Carlos A. Rodriguez , Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE20012644

.

Anthony Gonzalez of Anthony Gonzalez Law, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Hugo A. Rodriguez of The Law Offices of H.A . Rodriguez, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, G ERBER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 23  W. T. Uniack & Co., CPAs P.C. Certified Public Accountants  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms Consent  We consent to the inclusion in the filing of GoldCorp Holdings, Inc. on Form 10k and our report dated July 10, 2009 with respect to our audits of the financial statements of GoldCorp Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, which report appears with those financial statements referred to above.  We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the heading Experts in such Prospectus.  W.T. Uniack & Co., CPAs P.C. /s/ W.T. Uniack & Co., CPAs P.C.  Alpharetta, Georgia July 10, 2009
(January 17, 2001)

#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Manda Wertheimer Kristal, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 894]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1987, was suspended by this Court’s order dated November 20, 1998, for failure to comply with the at*791torney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (255 AD2d 827).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the applicable rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately. •
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Melvin M. Miyamoto, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Territorial Bancorp Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2010



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Melvin M. Miyamoto             
|Melvin M. Miyamoto                 
|Senior Vice President and Treasurer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Moroh 18, 1939 

Mr. Wrtimsr Brown 

Ereoutire Ssortrtarg 

Teaoher Eetiremnt System of Texas 

Auatin, T8x.m 

nukr airr 

the propor preoe6uTa. 

aa te pay the l eoamll&frb 

deeeBrsQ mmbeF.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 6, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Todd Offerbacker, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. David Rossiter, Hartington, Nebraska, individually and as trustee of the Mary E. Rossiter Trust, and Carol F. Rossiter, Macon, Georgia, individually and as trustee of the Mary E. Rossiter Trust, and the Margaret R. Rossiter Trust;*                     to retain control of Cedar Bancorp, Inc., parent of Bank of Hartington, both in Hartington, Nebraska, through the acquisition of voting shares. Also, Donald W. Rossiter, Carol F. Rossiter, Phyllis Schrempp, J. Scott Schrempp, Christine Rossiter, and Leon Schrempp, a group acting in concert, to retain control of Cedar Bancorp, Inc. parent of bank of Hartington, Nebraska.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 19, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-6407 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S