alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1







|Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.
        t2667 CAMINO DEL RIO S. PLAZA BtSAN DIEGOtCALIFORNIA
        92108-3707t
        tTELEPHONE (858)722-5953tFAX (858) 761-0341tFAX (858) 433-2979
        tE-MAIL changgpark@gmail.comt
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



December 13, 2012





To Whom It May
Concern:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Alarming Devices, Inc. of our report dated December 13, 2012, with respect to the
balance sheets as of August 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of income, cash flows, and shareholders’ deficit
for the fiscal years period ended August 31, 2012 and 2011, which appears on Form 10-K of Alarming Devices,
Inc.





Very truly yours,



/s/PLS CPA

____________________________

PLS CPA, A Professional Corp.

San Diego, CA 92111





Registered with the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6949

SHAWN L. GOODMAN,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, North Carolina Dept. of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. L. Patrick Auld, 

Magistrate Judge. (1:12-cv-00596-LPA)

Submitted: October 30, 2013 Decided: November 14, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn L. Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, 

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn L. Goodman seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Goodman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[No. 29576-8-II.

Division Two.

June 8, 2004.]

#### John Schroeder, et al., *Respondents,*v. Ruth A. Patterson, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 01-2-00592-9, Stephen M. Warning, J., entered November 1, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Hunt, J.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Vanessa Marie Van-Ness v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00607-CR

Trial court case number: 11CR1523

Trial court: 405th District Court of Galveston County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court on August 21, 2014. In the 

abatement order, we directed the trial court to determine whether appellant wished to 

pursue the appeal, and if so, whether or not appellant’s counsel, James M. Bennett, 

intended to abandon the appeal. The trial court held a hearing on our abatement order on 

September 4, 2014. The court reporter has filed a reporter’s record of the hearing. The 

district clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings 

and recommendations, stating that appellant wishes to prosecute the appeal, and 

appellant’s counsel has not abandoned the appeal, has been paid for the appeal, and will 

file appellant’s brief by October 4, 2014. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the 

Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than October 4, 2014. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of 

the filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 22, 2014
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Octagon 88 Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clinton F. Bateman, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  September 29, 2009
By:/s /Clinton F. Bateman


Title:    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of EAU Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian D. Heinhold,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





DATE:
      May
      13, 2008




/s/
                Brian D. Heinhold
              ______________________
              Brian
                D. Heinhold
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              EAU
                Technologies, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, Scholarly Works/Publication Grants (G13) Review.
    Date: July 9-10, 2009.
    Time: July 9, 2009, 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Time: July 10, 2009, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, MSC 
7968, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968. (301) 594-4937. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc94899d929b86bc919d9590d2929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea829f8b848d90aa878b8386c4848382c48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-6650 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 364 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 364

    Expressing support for the goals of Sports Eye Safety Month by 
 promoting the importance of playing sports with the proper protective 
                                eyewear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2023

 Mr. Hudson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for the goals of Sports Eye Safety Month by 
 promoting the importance of playing sports with the proper protective 
                                eyewear.

Whereas about 30,000 sports-related eye injuries, serious enough to end in a 
        visit to the emergency room, occur each year in the United States, and 
        the majority happen to those under the age of 18;
Whereas sports and recreation activities are associated with approximately one-
        fourth of all pediatric eye injuries;
Whereas eye injuries can lead to long-term vision impairment and can affect 
        learning, work, and relationships;
Whereas everyday dresswear eyeglasses, sunglasses, and contact lenses do not 
        offer adequate protection to guard against potential sports-related eye 
        injuries, and wearing protective sports eyewear, such as safety goggles 
        and special protective eyewear designed for specific sports, is as 
        important as putting on other protective gear;
Whereas sports-related eye injuries can be mitigated by use of technology in 
        protective eyewear for specific sports when appropriate;
Whereas individuals who participate in sports, especially school-aged athletes, 
        should ensure their protective eyewear products have undergone the 
        proper testing by an accredited laboratory and meets the current 
        American Society for Testing and Materials safety standard for the 
        selected sport;
Whereas before purchasing prescription protective eyewear, one should consult 
        with an eye care professional to ensure their prescription is up to 
        date;
Whereas more than 90 percent of sports- and recreation-related eye injuries can 
        be prevented by using appropriate eye and facial protection; and
Whereas April is recognized as Sports Eye Safety Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Sports Eye Safety 
        Month;
            (2) recognizes the importance of healthy vision; and
            (3) encourages all Americans, especially our youth, to play 
        sports with the proper prescription or nonprescription 
        protective eyewear.
                                 <all>
```
|**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                                           
|**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**                    

In connection with the Quarterly Report of M.C.F.T.Y. National (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof or immediately
thereafter (the "Report"), I, Gerald G. Brown, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer,
and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company

|/s/ GERALD G. BROWN                                                                  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Gerald G. Brown, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal
    Accounting Officer
|November 23, 2003                                                                    

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
to be filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

|
|
Order filed November 19, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00517-CV

____________

EVERBANK, AS SUCESSOR BY MERGER OF EVERHOME 

MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellant

V.

CARL D. SHAW, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-58741

O R D E R

On August 1, 2013, this court abated the appeal until November 7, 2013, and 

referred the parties to mediation. The order states, in pertinent part, “If mediation 

fully resolves the issues in the case, the court ORDERS the parties to file motion 

to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion on or before November 7, 2013.” 

On November 1, 2013, the mediator filed a report stating the mediation resulted in 

a full resolution of the matters in dispute. To date, the parties have not filed a 

motion to dismiss or a request for additional time to file a dispositive motion. 
2

Accordingly, we ORDER the parties to file a motion to dismiss, other 

dispositive motion, or a motion for an extension of time to file their dispositive 

motion within 10 days of the date of this order. If the parties do not comply with 

this court’s order within the designated time period, the court may dismiss the 

appeal. 

PER CURIAM
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

NO. 07-03-0269-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

MARCH 2, 2005

______________________________

JACK N JILL DONUTS, INC., APPELLANT

V.

EDWARD LLOYD, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A

A FRANCHISEE OF JACK N JILL DONUTS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2002-519,037; HONORABLE WILLIAM C. DODSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. perfected this appeal to challenge the trial court’s

judgment in favor of appellee Edward Lloyd, individually and d/b/a a franchisee of Jack N
2Although not mentioned in the final judgment, EDEB, Ltd. was made a party to the

underlying case by Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc.’s live pleading. The final judgment provides that

it disposes of all claims and all parties.

2

Jill Donuts. The final judgment recites that Jack N Jill take nothing by its suit and that

Edward Lloyd recover attorney’s fees in the amount of $17,500.

Pending before this Court is an agreed judgment by which the parties request we

reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding Lloyd and EDEB, Ltd. attorney’s

fees and render judgment that they take nothing from Jack N Jill.2 The parties further

request that the portion of the judgment holding that Jack N Jill take nothing from Lloyd and

EDEB, Ltd. be affirmed. Finally, the parties agree to bear their own costs. The agreed

judgment is signed by counsel for all parties.

Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(2)(A) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure we

reverse and render in part and affirm in part. To effectuate the parties’ agreement, that

portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding Edward Lloyd, individually and d/b/a a

franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd., is reversed and judgment is hereby

rendered that they take nothing from Jack N Jill, Donuts, Inc. The portion of the judgment

that Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. take nothing against Edward Lloyd, individually and d/b/a a

franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd. is in all other respects affirmed. Costs

are to be assessed by the party incurring them.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice
| 1.     | Such annual report of Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such annual report of Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Green, Inc. |

| Date: October 13, 2010              |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                |
| CHINA GREEN, INC.                   |
|                                |
| By: /s/ Wei Guo Wang                |
| Wei Guo WangChief Financial Officer |
|                                |
|   | I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that: |
|--------|--------------------------------------|

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Redwood Mortgage Investors IX, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (the “Registrant”); and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6715]



[[Page 12873]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Pilot Lifestyle Interventions for Pregestational 
Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes, PEP 2009-R-01/02

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-4 p.m., May 20, 2009 (Closed).
1 p.m.-4 p.m., May 21, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of ``Pilot Lifestyle Interventions for 
Pregestational Diabetes or Gestational Diabetes, PEP 2009-R-01/02.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Linda Shelton, Program 
Specialist, Coordinating Center for Health and Information Service, 
Office of the Director, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E21, 
Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 498-1194.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 16, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E9-6715 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P