alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.2**

 

Certification of CFOunder Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

*Icertify that this periodic report containing the issuer’s financial statementsfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that informationcontained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.*

 
|   | *By:*                                                | */s/  John F. Coger* |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   |                                                 |
|   | *Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer* |
|   |                                                 |
|   | *Date:*                                              | *June 7, 2004*       |   |
|        |                                                      |                      |        |  |  |

 

----
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with thequarterly report of Primus Guaranty, Ltd., a Bermuda company (the"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Thomas W. Jasper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,Richard Claiden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                                      |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | to my knowledge, the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date: November 14, 2005

|  | /s/Thomas W. Jasper Thomas W. Jasper Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/ Richard ClaidenRichard Claiden Chief Financial Officer |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105
 

NOV 17 2011 

Mr. Dan Bevier 

Salt River Project 

P. O. Box 1018 

St.Johns,Aurizona 85936 

Dear Mr. Bevier: 

I am writing to inform you that EPA Region 9 is developing a partial Regional Haze Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP) for the state of Aurizona. The purpose of the Regional Haze FIP is to improve 

visibility in national parks and wilderness areas in Aurizona and surrounding states as required by Section 

169A of the Clean Air Act (Act). During the process of developing the Aurizona Regional Haze State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to EPA on March 2,2011, the Aurizona Department of 

Environmental Quality (ADEQ) performed a five-factor Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) 

analysis for the Coronado Generating Station. We will revisit ADEQ's determination, and possibly 

conduct a new five-factor BART analysis, to determine whether any additional emissions controls are 

warranted under section 169A(b)(2)(A) of the Act, and EPA's implementing regulations and BART 

guidelines at 40 CFR Part 51, Subpart P and Appendix Y. 

As we begin our FIP analysis, we have requested that ADEQ provide us with all background materials, 

including BART analyses, that were performed by them or the affected facilities. We may also request 

that you provide us with additional information on the Coronado Generating Station as our analysis 

proceeds. In the meantime, we welcome the submission of any additional, relevant information that you 

would like to provide to our office. 

EPA has entered into a consent decree that requires the Agency to propose approval of Aurizona's 

Regional Haze SIP and/or propose a Regional Haze FIP that meets the requirements of the Act and 

EPA's regional haze regulations by May 15, 2012. The consent decree also requires the Agency to take 

final action on the Aurizona Regional Haze SIP and/or FIP by November 15,2012. EPA Region 9 will 

hold public hearings in Aurizona and solicit public comments on a proposed Aurizona Regional Haze FIP 

in the months preceding the November 15 deadline. 

If you would like to submit any additional information or analysis, we request that you send it by 

February 29,2012. Any modeling ofthe facility should use the regulatory versions of CALPUFF 

(version 5.8, level 070623), CALMET (version 5.8, level 070623), and CALPOST (version 6.221). You 

may wish to prepare a modeling protocol and consult with EPA Region 9 about the preparation of 

modeling inputs in accord with EPA guidance. Submit any infonnation to: 

Thomas Webb 

US EPA (AIR-2) 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 
You can also reach Thomas at webb.thomas@epa.gov or by phone at 415-947-4139. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Thomas Webb or 

myself (mckaughan.colJeen@epa.gov, 520-498-0118). 

Colleen McKaughan 

Associate Director, Air Division 

cc: Henry R. Darwin, ADEQ 

Eric Massey, ADEQ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyTreasurer and Principal Accounting OfficerDate:  January 20, 2005This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

          - 15 CFR Part 922 
          - [Docket No. 080311420-9008-02] 
          - RIN 0648-AT17 

# AGENCY:

Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC). 

      ( print page 12088)    

# ACTION:

Notice of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

NOAA published a final revised management plan and revised regulations for the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary (CINMS) January 16, 2009 (74 FR 3216). Under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act, the final regulations automatically take effect after 45 days of continuous session of Congress beginning on January 16, 2009. The 45-day period ends on March 19, 2009. This document provides notice of the effective date, March 19, 2009. 

# DATES:

The regulations published on January 16, 2009 (74 FR 3216) are effective on March 19, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Murray, Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary, 805-884-1464. 

Dated: March 18, 2009. 

William Corso, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management.

 [FR Doc. E9-6266 Filed 3-19-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P
Record of Discu ss ion Do cket No. FAA-2011-141 1 Directorate I dentifier: 20 11-NM-074-AD With whom o uts ide the FAA h as this action b een discu sse d (i.e., Des ign Approval Ho lder , manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA , etc)?

ORGANJZAT IO N PER SO N CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED Bo eing (DAH) Branden 

### L. Ludholtz 1 0 / 09/ 2012 Other. List below

. B oeing (DAH) Don Rockwell 11 17 /20 14 Co n cur.

Oth er/Ad di tional Inf orma ti on: Mr. Ludholtz brought to my attention via ema il the erro r in the AD lan guage in paragraph (i)(l) referencing paragraph (h) when it should have been paragraph (g). It is for this reason the A D revision is necessary. The new SB 737

- 31Al325-.Revision 1 , contains a statement directing operators to contact Boeing for addition al service instructions. B ecause of this statement, a supersedure (instead of a revision) to the AD is necessary.
Samuel VAZQUEZ-GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 106638

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: March 19, 2019

Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Eric Schmitt, Justin A. Moody, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*202***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Vazquez-Gonzalez appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golf Two, Inc. a Delaware corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), David Bennett, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golf Two, Inc., and will be retained by Golf Two, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ David Bennett
--------------------------
David Bennett
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Panezo, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 580]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered January 6, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (two counts), reckless endangerment in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal trespass in the first degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress testimony concerning the showup identification made of him near the crime scene *(see, People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541; *People v Hicks,*68 NY2d 234; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Maher,*89 NY2d 318; *People v Vanegas,*237 AD2d 469; *People v McCargo,*219 AD2d 683, *lv denied*87 NY2d 904, *cert denied*518 US 1008). Ritter, J. P., Altman, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
[No. 52618-9-I.

Division One.

June 1, 2004.]

#### Glen L. Walker, *Appellant,*v. Jordanne Vlcheck, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-2-25877-0, Jay V. White, J., entered June 26, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2011 of Alarming Devices, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira, President, Secretary/Treasurer, Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date: December 14, 2011





/s/Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira


Name:  Andre Luiz Nascimento Moreira


Title: President, Secretary Treasurer and Director


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Terry ISBELL, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106433

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: February 26, 2019

Christian Lehmberg, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg 7, Ste 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

*90***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Terry Isbell, Sr. ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2016) motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Sean R. Stover, as Chief Financial Officer of NextMedia Operating, Inc.(the “**Company**”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the“**Report**”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 15, 2005 

 

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THISWRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO NEXTMEDIA OPERATING, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY NEXTMEDIA OPERATING, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
```

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly filing of Stock Market Solutions, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, Richard Smitten, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/S/Richard Smitten
President and Principal Financial Officer
```
RIVER CITY DRYWALL, INC. and Agers Heating & Air Conditioning, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CERVETTO HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a CBE Constructors, Appellant, and Showtime I-20, LTD d/b/a Showtime I-20 Limited Partnership and Avalon St. Louis Holdings, LP, Respondents.

No. ED 107021

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: April 16, 2019

Matthew D. Menghini, John W. Rourke, Joseph C. Blanner, 825 Maryville Centre Drive, Suite 300, St. Louis, MO 63017, For Appellant.

David M. Duree, 312 South Lincoln Avenue, P.O. Box 1416, O'Fallon, IL 62269, For Respondents.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*703*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Cervetto Holdings, LLC (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's Order and Partial Judgment denying its motion to vacate arbitration award, granting respondent Avalon St. Louis Holdings, LP's (Avalon) motion to confirm arbitration award, and granting Avalon's and respondent Showtime I-20, LTD's collective motion for summary judgment against Appellant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,447]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 2, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of all workers of BHP Billiton, BHP Copper, Inc., Pinto Valley Operations & San Manuel Arizona Railroad Company, Miami, Arizona.

The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment

[FR Doc. E9-6535 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 18(a)**

February 24, 2010 

Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC 

1601 Bryan Street 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Dear Sirs/Madams: 

We have audited theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC and subsidiaries (“Intermediate Holding”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 (successor balance sheets), and for theyears ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (successor operations), the period from October 11, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (successor operations) and the period from January 1, 2007 through October 10, 2007 (predecessoroperations) of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (as Intermediate Holding’s predecessor), included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated February 24, 2010(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to Energy Future Holdings Corp. completing its merger with Texas Energy Future Merger Sub Corp on October 10, 2007). Note 1 to such financial statementscontains a description of your change, during the year ended December 31, 2009, in the date for the annual goodwill impairment test for your reporting unit. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that ispreferable under the circumstances. 

Yours truly, 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Dallas, Texas