## DOCKET NO: A-98-49

Item: II-B3-112



## Emplacement Inspection Report

EPA INSPECTION No. EPA-WIPP-6.10-29c

OF THE

WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT June 29 to July 1, 2010

U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Center for Waste Management and Regulation 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

July 2010

### Contents

1.0 Executive Summary....................................................................... 4

2.0 Inspection Purpose and Scope............................................................. 5

3.0 Inspection Team, Observers and Participants........................................... 5

4.0 Performance of the Inspection............................................................. 6

5.0 Waste Emplacement/WDS............................................................... 7

6.0 Magnesium Oxide Backfill................................................................. 10

7.0 Comparison with Inventory limits...........................................................13

8.0 Summary of Results...........................................................................14

Attachments

Attachment A – Inspection Plan.......................................................................16

Attachment B – Summary of Waste Emplacement Inventory Report, July 1,

2010................................17

Attachment C - Materials Emplaced in WIPP as of June 30, 2010..............................19

Attachment D – WDS bar code reader disp laying MgO Balance for Panel 5, Room 4

...................................20

Attachment E – Procedures Examined................................................................22

Attachment F – Inspection Checklist.................................................................23

Tables

Table A Inspection Participants................................................................ 6

Table B Waste Containers Reviewed During Inspection...................................9

Table C Emplaced CPR Quantities as of July 1, 2010....................................14

### Figures

Figure 1 Typical RH and CH TRU Mixed Wa ste Disposal Configuration ...............8

Figure 2 Arrangement of dis posed waste in a room ..........................................9

Figure 3 Photo of disposed waste in Room 4 of Panel 5.....................................11

Figure 4 Equipment prepared for RH wast e emplacement in Room 3 of Panel 5...... 12

Figure 5 Emplaced RH Waste selected for review............................................13

.

### 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agen cy (EPA or the Agency) conducted an inspection of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Waste Isolation P ilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico, from June 29 to July 1, 2010, in accordance with 40 CFR 194.21. The WIPP is a disposal system for defense-related transuranic (TRU) waste as defined by the WIPP

Land Withdrawal Act. 1 

### EPA certified that WIPP complies with the Agency’s radioactive waste disposal regulations (Subparts B an d C of 40 CFR Part 191) on May 18, 1998.

The purpose of this annual inspection is to determine that waste sent to WIPP during the past year has been emplaced in the undergr ound facility in the manner specified in DOE’s Compliance Certification Application and other approvals. The inspectio n reviews the site’s ability to receive, process, and emplace contact- handled and remote-handled TRU wastes within the repository, the emplacement of magnesium oxi de (MgO) backfill in appropriate amounts to fulfill DOE commitments and requirements, and the maintenance of records pertaining to waste shipping, packaging, and emplacement, including the electronic Waste Data System (WDS). EPA examined selected activities, such as remo te-handled and contact- handled waste processing, waste emplacement activities, and record keeping. During this year’s inspection EPA placed specific emphasis on the tracking of emplaced wa ste and magnesium oxide (MgO) engineered barrier using the WDS, due to the fact that DOE implemented the new WDS to replace the WIPP Waste Information System (WWIS) in the in terim since EPA’s most recent (July 2009) emplacement inspection.

EPA concluded that DOE’s emplacement activitie s are adequate, that CPR is appropriately tracked and recorded, that MgO balances are calculated properly, and that MgO is emplaced properly. EPA observed the use of the proper waste emplacement procedures in the underground, and successful implementation of the WDS wast e container bar code reader. EPA did not identify any findings or concerns during this inspection.

1 WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, Public Law 102-579, Section 2(18), as amended by the 1996 WIPP LWA
Amendments, Public Law 104-201.

### 2

. 0 INSPECTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this annual inspection is to verify that contact-handled (CH) and remotehandled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste sent to WIPP during the past year has been emplaced in the underground facility in the ma nner specified in DOE’s Complia nce Certification Application and other approvals. EPA performed this in spection under authority of 40 CFR 194.21, which authorizes the Agency to inspect WIPP duri ng its operational period to verify continued compliance with EPA’s WIPP Compliance Criteria and the certificati on decision of May 18, 1998. Emplacement of waste and backfill, in partic ular, is relevant to compliance because the emplacement method supports the models that DOE uses in the WIPP performance assessment.

Activities within the scope of this inspection included: demonstration of the WIPP site’s ability to receive, process, and emplace remote -handled (RH) and contact-handled (CH) TRU wastes within the repository, the use of magne sium oxide (MgO) backf ill in amounts to fulfill certification requirements and othe r approvals, maintenance of rele vant waste packaging records, including the electronic Waste Data System (WDS) and the verifica tion of appropriately implemented quality assurance practices. The re view and examination of documents related to these activities is an important part of the in spection process. The WIPP site is operated by Washington TRU-Solutions (WTS) under contract to DOE, and the majority of waste related

activities onsite are described by or contro lled through WTS procedures. A list of WTS procedures examined during this inspec tion is provided in Attachment G.

3.0 INSPECTION TEAM, OBSE RVERS, AND PARTICIPANTS

The inspection team consisted of three EPA staff. Thomas Kesterson and Steve Holmes of the New Mexico Environment Department and Claude Magnuson from DOE headquarters observed the inspection activities. A partial list of inspection participants is provided in Table A.

### Table A Inspection Participants

INSPECTION TEAM

MEMBER POSITION AFFILIATION

Chuck Byrum Inspector EPA ORIA

Nick Stone Inspector EPA Region 6

Jonathan Walsh Inspector EPA ORIA

CBFO / WTS PERSONNEL

Rey Carrasco CBFO

Art Chavez WRES

Dan Ferguson CBFO

Chris Luona WTS

Dave Speed WTS

David Squires WTS

Gene Valett WTS

Mike Strum WTS

### 4.0 PERFORMANCE OF THE INSPECTION

The inspection took place from June 29 to Ju ly 1, 2010, at DOE’s Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) and at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (W IPP) facility, which is located approximately 26 miles south east of Carlsbad, New Mexic o. The opening meeting with CBFO and WTS personnel was held on the morning of June 29. Several DOE and WTS staff presented information addressing program status, updates and changes since the last EPA emplacement inspection in July 2009.

EPA inspectors accompanied CBFO and WTS personnel into the underground repository on the morning of June 30, in order to examine waste packages and MgO that had been emplaced in Panel 5. Inspectors review ed paper records documenting that waste emplacement and MgO tracking were conducted in accordance with procedur es. Inspectors selected several containers and recorded their numbers (see Figure 5 for container locations); the records for these containers were examined both in the repository, and later using the WDS computer database, to verify correct waste information is recorded by DOE. WTS personnel answered EPA questions about how waste is handled and emplaced.

During the afternoon of June 30, EPA inspecto rs visited the CH and RH waste handling areas aboveground. Also on June 30, inspectors re motely accessed the WDS, and were able to generate Container and Canister Data Reports for the RH bore holes and CH waste containers observed in the underground that morning. On July 1, inspectors discussed record-keeping procedures with WDS data administrators at the Carlsbad Field Office, and WTS personnel generated additional reports and queries for the inspectors, EPA presented its preliminary observations at a close-out meeting on the afternoon of July 16.

5.0 WASTE EMPLACEMENT/WDS

Wastes received at the repository include c ontact-handled (CH) transuranic wastes from Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E) in Illinois, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in New Mexico, Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Hanford Site in Washington, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology S ite (RFETS) in Colorado, Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina, the Nevada Test Site (NTS) in Nevada, and the Oak Ri dge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Tennessee. These wastes are receiv ed and emplaced in several configurations: Standard Waste Boxes (SWBs), 55-gallon drums assembled in groups of seven called a Seven Pack, 100 gallon drums for supercompacted wast e, and Ten Drum Overpacks (TDOP). RH wastes from INL, ORNL, and SRS have been em placed in the WIPP, using the 72-B canister.

The repository is subdivided into panels, each panel consisting of seven rooms. At the time of the inspection, CH waste was being empl aced in Panel 5, Room 4 and RH waste in the walls of Panel 5, Room 3. CH waste containers are stacked in columns (waste stacks) combining SWBs, drum packs, and TDOPs (see Figures 2 and 3) . TDOPs are always placed on the floor of the room, occupying the bottom and middle position of a waste column. SWBs and drums may be emplaced in any order, with most wastes em placed as received. The waste columns are in a series of staggered rows, with a row consisting of three columns that span the distance of a

### disposal room from left to right (Figure 2). RH waste is placed in the walls on eight foot centers (Figures 1, 4, and 5).

### Figure 1

Typical RH and CH TRU Mixed Waste Disposal Configuration

Figure 2 Figure 2 Illustrates the arrang ement of disposed contact-handled waste in underground. Represented are stacks of seven-packs of drums and standard waste boxes.

In Panel 5, Room 3 inspectors observed bore holes drilled to emplace RH containers, and observed the Horizontal Emplacement/Retrieval E quipment set up to emplace a RH canister in BH 31(Figure 4).

While underground in Panel 5, Room 4, EPA insp ectors selected rece ntly emplaced CH waste packages for review. The inspector read the shipment identification numbers directly off the emplaced containers (See Figure 3 for CH locati ons). The containers selected are identified

in Table B below.

Table B

Waste Containers Reviewed During Inspection (Panel 5, Room 4) CH Waste (Field verified)

Site of Waste Container Origin Identifier Container Type INL BN10363651 Ten Drum Overpack (TDOP)

RF BN10218018 Standard Waste Box INL BN10368262 100-gallon drum LA LAS892993 55-gallon drum

### RH Waste (Panel 5, Room 3) Waste Empl acement Report and Container Data Report

Site of Waste Container Origin Identifier Borehole Number

ANL AE0036 046

ANL ID0209 099

In the interim since the July 2009 inspection, WDS/WWIS staff implemented the change from the WIPP Waste Information System (WWIS) to the Waste Data System, or WDS. The basic structure, an Oracle database, did not cha nge. The WDS replaces the WWIS Oracle Forms application with a Java-based web interface, so that the database may be accessed remotely

without additional software inst allation. The modules of the WWIS have been replaced by

“dashboards” which deliver functions and inform ation targeted at a specific user. The underlying data was preserved, and the WWIS is consid ered to be a subset of the WDS.

On the evening of June 30, EPA inspectors i ndependently accessed the WDS and generated reports available through the EPA Dashboard, incl uding the Container Data Reports and Canister Data Reports, for containers observed in th e underground. EPA staff additionally duplicated reports that had been examined during the 2009 inspection, and compared them with WWIS results, to verify that the WDS successfully pe rforms the same functions. On the morning of July 1 at CBFO, inspectors met with WTS personnel, who answered questions and generated the Nuclide Report, Waste Emplacement Report and th e MgO safety factor calculations. All electronic records were found to contain requir ed waste stream, container, and emplacement

information.

6.0 MAGNESIUM OXIDE BACKFILL

Magnesium oxide (MgO) is the engineered barr ier used in the reposit ory as backfill, as specified in DOE’s Compliance Certification Application ( CCA). EPA requires DOE to maintain an MgO safety factor (excess factor) to ensure that adequate MgO is chemically available to control the chemistry of each room after closure. EPA approved lowering the required safety factor to 1.2 from 1.67 in a letter dated February 11, 2008, requiring the emplacement of sufficient MgO to react with 1.2 times the amount of carbon present in the repository. Conditions of EPA’ s agreement stipulate that DOE must ensure a minimum reactivity of 96% for the MgO emplaced, and maintain the safety factor on a room-by-room basis. DOE instituted this change in March 2009, and it was a focus of EPA’s 2009 inspection.

During the opening meeting, Gene Valett gave a presentation updating DOE’s MgO management. Process steps guiding MgO place ment and documentation in the underground continue to be found in WP 05-WH1025, CH Waste Downloading and Emplacement , and WP05-WH.02, 

### WIPP Waste Handling Operations WDS User’s Manual

. 

### Waste Handling Engineers (WHE) may record the quantity and placement of MgO elect ronically using a WWIS/WDS bar code reader, or manually via paper forms if a ba r code reader is unavaila ble. The appropriate forms (CH Waste Downloading and Emplacement Data Sheet and Supersack/BRT Emplacement Data Sheet) are included as Attachments 1 a nd 3 of WP 05-WH1025. Wh ile in the underground

### repository, EPA inspectors verified that the pr oper procedures were used to track MgO emplacement in Panel 5, Room 4 and that MgO was emplaced on top of the CH waste stacks as stipulated. 3,000 pound sacks are now being empl aced in the underground, and were seen in Panel 5, Room 4 at the time of the inspection.

At the conclusion of each shift, the WHE mu st electronically verify the safety factor of 1.2 using the WDS. During the inspection of the underground, a WHE was asked to demonstrate the

use of the WWIS/WDS bar code reader to track the emplacement of waste and MgO, allowing inspectors to determine that current procedur es are being followed correctly, and that a MgO safety factor in excess of 1.2 is being mainta ined in Panel 5, Room 4 [Attachment D].

Checklist items 12-17 and 24 specifically relate to MgO management and demonstrate that DOE has appropriate processes in place to ensure that MgO is properly emplaced.

Figure 3 . Photo of disposed waste in Panel 5, Room 7.

DOE is emplacing waste stack ed 2-3 containers high topped with MgO Supersacks. Figure 3 shows all container types being shipped to date. Large drums are Ten Drum Overpacks (TDOPs), black barrels are 100-gallon drums with superc ompacted waste, standard waste boxes, and standard 55-gallon drum 7-packs. 3000 lb supe rsacks are visible on top of the stack in Figure 3.

### Figure 4 Equipment prepared for RH waste emplacement in Room 3 of Panel 5

### Figure 5 Emplaced RH waste location selected for review

7.0 COMPARISON WITH INVENTORY LIMITS

In the Summary of Waste Emplacement Inve ntory Report, available through the EPA dashboard, EPA was provided data for emplaced waste, including total activities of the ten EPAtracked radionuclides, total weights of ferr ous and non-ferrous metals, and the CPR/MgO balance by room, as of 7/1/2010. More detailed data on the total amounts of specific materials emplaced was provided by WDS staff, using a script to run a custom WDS query.

EPA establishes limits for certain waste components at WIPP by approving performance assessment inventory estimates. Some limits, such as for iron and other metals, are minimum

limits. The amount of iron a nd steel are now at 2.02 x 10 7 

### kg. The minimum limit of 2 x 10 7 

### kg iron has now been met for the repository.

Other waste component limits are maximum lim its. Of special concern is the maximum

limit on the total amount of cellulo sic, plastic and rubber (CPR) ma terials. In the original CCA,

DOE estimated the limit for CPR was 2.2 x 10 7 

### kg, establishing the limit EPA required DOE to meet. In the subsequent performance assessmen t baseline calculations, DOE added packaging materials to the calculations, and now the CPR limit for WIPP is 2.4 x 10 7 

### kg (see Table C).

### CPR values are tracked on a per container basis and the current CPR values as of July 1, 2010

are listed in Table C.

As of this inspection the WIPP contained almost 5.2 x 10 6 

### kg of CPR in waste and 1.5 x

10 6 

### kg of CPR in packaging material. In addition, emplacement CPR, such as the slip sheets used to aid the emplacement of the c ontainers, accounts for another 4.3 x 10 5 

### kg of CPR. This is

a total of 6.4 x 10 6 

### kg of cellulosic, plastic and rubber material. The mass of rubber materials currently accounts for 4.3% of the total mass of CPR, compared to 3.4% in 2009, 5% in 2008, 4.7% in 2007, and 7% in 2006. The WIPP curren tly contains approximately 30% of its maximum limit for CPR. The repository held 29% of its limit for CPR in 2009, 24% in 2008,

and 21% in 2007.

Table C Emplaced CPR Quantities as of July 1, 2010

Waste CPR: Emplacement CPR: Type Weight (kg) Type Weight (kg)

--------------- --------------- ------ ----------- ------------ --------- Cellulosic 2,011,586 Cellulosic 51,631 Plastic 2,870,157 Plastic 376,203 Rubber 316,667
Total 5,198,410 (kg) 427,834 (kg)

Packaging CPR: MgO CPR: Type Weight (kg) Type Weight (kg)

--------------- --------------- ----- ----------- ------------ --------- Cellulosic 846,973 Cellulosic 49,922 Plastic 633,707 Plastic 55,569 Total 1,480,680 (kg) 105,491(kg)

Grand Totals: Cellulosic + Plastic = 6,895,748 Rubber = 316,667

Total CPR = 7,212,415 (kg)

8.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

The inspectors reviewed emplacement operations, WTS procedures, and records

associated with selected containers. The su rface processing of CH and RH waste as well as underground operations were reviewed and found to be adequate, accordi ng to specified plans documented in the CCA. EPA concludes that DOE’s emplacement activities and records are adequate, that CPR and MgO are appropriately tracked. EPA iden tified no findings or concerns.

### Attachment A

WIPP Emplacement Inspection Plan for the Year 2010

Purpose: The purpose of this inspection is to determin e if waste sent to WIPP during the past year has been emplaced in the underground facility in the manner specified in DOE’s Compliance Certification Application and other approvals. The objective evidence is the documentation that EPA can use to verify that DOE is conducting its opera tion appropriately.

EPA is performing this inspection un der the authority of 40 CFR 194.21, which authorizes the Agency to inspect the WIPP dur ing its operational period to verify continued compliance with EPA’s WIPP Compliance Criteria and the certificati on decision of May 18,

1998.

• Is DOE emplacing waste in the underground at WIPP in a manner specified in DOE’s Complianc e Certification Application (EPA Air Docket A-93-02, Item II-G-01, and associated documents)?

• Is DOE emplacing waste in the underground at WIPP in a manner to assure that the 1.2 safety factor is maintained.

### 17 Scope: The scope of this inspection includes: demonstrati on of the site’s ability to receive, process, and emplace contact-handled and remote-handled TRU wast es within the repository, the use of magnesium oxide (MgO) backfill in appropriate amounts to fulfill DOE commitments and requirements, maintenance of relevant waste packaging records, including the electronic WIPP Waste Information system (WWIS) and the verification of appropriately implemented quality assurance practices. The availability of documentation of these processes and activities will be a ma jor source of review.

Focal Areas for this Year’s Inspection:

- What changes have taken place to emplacemen t activities and documentation since last year’s inspection?

- What changes have taken place to MgO empl acement since EPA’s approval of decreased MgO?

Location: The inspection will be held at DOE’s WIPP f acility located twenty-six miles southeast of Carlsbad, New Mexico and the Carlsbad Field Offi ce (CBFO) in Carlsbad. Inspection activities will include examination of the undergro und facilities, review of records related to waste emplacement, and

other information as needed.

Duration: The EPA expects to complete its inspection in about two days plus an initial meeting. Each full day will begin with an opening meeting at 8:00 a.m. and end no later than 5:00 p.m. with a closeout

session.

Expected Date: Week of June 28, 2010

Documents For Review:

Electronically provide for this inspection the la test version of pertin ent documentation and/or procedures related to CH and RH waste emplacement, MgO, WWIS, training, etc.

### 18 Attachment B

Summary of Waste Emplacement Inventory Report July 1, 2010

### 19 Attachment C

Materials Emplaced in WIPP as of June 30, 2010

CH WASTE:

MP Material Type Material Descri ption Material Weight (kg)

1 Waste Iron Based Metal/Alloys 7,405,386.80 2 Waste Aluminum Based Metal/Alloys 47,112.46 3 Waste Other Metal/ Alloys 294,508.50 4 Waste Other Inorganic Materials 1,378,937.75 6 Waste Cellulosics 2,011,515.06 7 Waste Rubber 316,659.66 8 Waste Plastics 2,825,398.78 9 Waste Solidified Inorganic Material 6,459,683.31 10 Waste Solidified Organic Material 1,680,227.60 12 Waste Soils 376,384.27

13 Steel - Packaging Steel Container Materials 12,560,985.89

14 Plastic - Plastic /Liners Container Packaging Materials 633,311.90 15 Cellulosic - Cellulosic Packaging Packaging Materials 846,968.88 18 Emplacement Cellulosic Emplacement Material 51,630.66 20 Emplacement Plastic Emplacement 376,203.05

Material

RH Waste

1 Waste Iron Base Metal/Alloys 37,522.63 2 Waste Aluminum Base Metal/Alloys 29.20 3 Waste Other Metal/Alloys 6.62 4 Waste Other Inorganic Materials 13.00

6 Waste Cellulosics 71.05

7 Waste Rubber 7.30 8 Waste Plastics 44,748.15 9 Waste Solidified Inorga nic Material 18.55 10 Waste Solidified Organic Material 15.00 13 Steel Steel Container Materials 202,489.57 Packaging

14 Plastic Plastic/ Liners Container Packaging Materials 395.34 15 Cellulosic Cellulosics Packaging 4.26 Packaging Materials

### 20 MgO

16 Emplacement Magnesium Oxide 27,288,465.89 18 Emplacement Cellulosic Emplacement Mat’l 49,921.50 20 Emplacement Plastic Emplacement Mat’l 55,569.00

### 21 Attachment D



### WDS bar code reader displaying Mg O Balance for Panel 5, Room 4

### 22 Attachment E

Procedures Examined

### 23 Attachment F EPA Emplacement Inspection Checklist – July 14-16, 2009

# Questions: Comments and Objective Evidence Results

Waste Emplacement

1 Is waste being emplaced in the underground facility in the manner specified in DOE’sCompliance Certification/ ReCertification or other relevant

documentation? Yes. Procedure WP 05-WH1025, CH Waste Downloading and Emplacement, Section 2, describes the CH emplacement procedures. Visual verification of the emplaced waste in Rows 146 through 148 of Panel 5, Room 4 confirmed waste emplacement in accordance with facility procedure and CCA

documentation .

RH processing procedures for 72-B (WP 05-WH1710, WP 05-WH1725) and 10-160-B (WP 05-WH1722) containers are consistent with the approach discussed in the CCA documentation. Emplacement in the repository walls with borehole plugs was verified during inspection of the underground. Satisfactory

2 Are CH waste containers stacked in columns appropriately given the type of container? Yes. In WP 05-WH1025, CH Downloading and Emplacement, a note at step 2.25 specifies appropriate stacking of CH container types. Attachment 2 of the same procedure specifies payload assembly positioning. Visual verification confirmed adherence to procedure (e.g. TDOPs placed in bottom position of waste columns.) Satisfactory

### 24 3 Are records adequate?

Randomly select 3-4 CH and 2-3 RH waste containers to verify records for waste approval, shipment, and receipt. Yes. TRU Waste Receipt WP 08-NT3020, Rev.18 describes the process. Reco rds produced are Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest, TRU Waste Receipt Checklist, Shipment Summary Report, RH waste Processing Data Sheet, Radiological Survey Report, and Waste Emplacement Report. CH waste produces comparable records. EPA reviewed records and found the records to be adequate and traceable.

Selected Containers:



### CH Waste (Panel 5, Room 4, Rows 146-148)


### - Ten Drum Overpack (TDOP), BN10363651 - Standard Waste Box, BN10218018 - 100-gallon drum, BN10368262 - 55-gallon drum, LAS892993

RH Waste (Panel 5, Room 3) - Borehole 046, AE0036 - Borehole 099, ID0209 Satisfactory

4 Is DOE properly emplacing backfill material (magnesium oxide [MgO]) with the waste packages?

Are supersacks placed on top of waste stacks according to procedure? Yes. 3000-pound supersacks were observed to be emplaced on top of each waste assembly at the active waste face in Panel 5 Room 4. WP 05-WH1025, CH Waste Downloading and Emplacement, Section 3.0, establishes procedure for emplacement of MgO. Satisfactory

5 Verify documentation for the

containers listed in item 3 - waste generator site transmittal of waste to WIPP, WIPP approval, shipment certification for transport to WIPP, shipment initiation documentation, shipment received at WIPP records, waste emplaced in the underground, and placement of engineered barrier [MgO]. Inspectors examined paper records maintained underground and electronic records kept aboveground for the selected containers. Site operators

demonstrated the use of the WDS bar code reader to track emplacement of waste and MgO. Documentation was determined to be adequate. Satisfactory

RH Waste Emplacement Questions

6 Are RH containers approved for receipt, received, processed, and emplaced properly? Yes. Inspection of the underground and RH handling area showed procedures to be in agreement with WP 05-WH1710, 72-B RH Processing, and WP 05- WH1725, RH Waste Downloading and Emplacement. Satisfactory.

### 25 7 Are RH containers appropriately

tracked?

Where is the information?

--In the WDS, what report

--During the receipt/transfer process where is it recorded?

--In the underground? Yes. Appropriate information is found in the WDS Canister Data Report, a nd on the underground facility map maintained by the Waste Handling Engineers in the underground. Satisfactory.

8 Content of RH canisters

--pick 1 to 3 canisters See Item 3 above. The Canister Data Report was generated and reviewed for each canister. Satisfactory

9 Volume and mass and/or concentration of important waste components and radionuclides (RH and CH)?

Are they within statutory and regulatory limits? Detailed description of nuclide information is included in the Waste Container Data Reports and Canister Data Reports generated.

Yes. Satisfactory

10 Are RH boreholes closed properly?

(Note: also see #9 for tracking of RH in the U/G) Recently emplaced borehole plugs, and plugs prepared for emplacement, were observed by inspectors in the underground to be in accordance with WP 05- WH1725, Rev. 3, RH Waste Downloading and Emplacement. Satisfactory

11 Is a photographic record made of the RH canister number during emplacement and retained in the permanent record? No. The canister ID number is verified by two operators during cask transfer, via closed-circuit television in accordance with procedure 05-WH1710, 72-B RH Processing, Section 8.24. WTS personnel provided EPA inspectors with screen shots from this process. Tapes are maintained for one year, and WP 05-WH1710 Att. 1, RH Waste Processing Data Sheet, then becomes the permanent r ecord. EPA finds this to be adequate. Satisfactory

Question: Procedure

12 Do DOE procedures reflect an MgO safety factor to 1.2? Partially. WP 05-WH1025, CH Waste Downloading and Emplacement, Rev. 1, Section 3.0, Backfill, establishes procedures to maintain a safety factor of 1.2 or greater per room on a daily basis. Procedures in the WDS User’s Manual, WP-05-WH.02, Rev. 0, Sections 6.2.5, 9.5.3, and Attachment 1 reflect the 1.2 safety factor and the use of 3,000-lb. supersacks as necessary. WHEs were observed to be using current procedures and the WDS bar code reader to record MgO emplacement in the underground. Satisfactory

13 Are both CPR and MgO

calculated and tracked on a roomby-room basis? Yes. Calculations are performed by the Waste Handling Engineer at the conclusion of each shift, through the WDS, using the MgO Balance Report or Daily Report, as required by WP 05-WH1025, CH Waste Downloading and Emplacement, Rev. 1, Section 3.0, Backfill. Satisfactory

### 26 14 Are sampling and analytical procedures in place to ascertain that emplaced MgO maintains a minimum of 96% reactivity? Yes. Specification D-0101, Prepackaged MgO Backfill, Rev. 8 and WP 05-WH1105, MgO Sample Records Management, Rev. 0, set forth analytical and document management procedures to verifying that each shipment of MgO maintains a 96 +/- 2% reactivity. Satisfactory

15 Is the acceptance of the MgO backfill material from the supplier

documented? Yes. WP 05-WH1105, MgO Sample Records Management, Rev. 0, Sec. 2.0 requires each shipment to be numbered, and the MgO supplier to provide an Analysis of Shipment and a sample under Chain of Custody for each shipment. Supersacks in the underground were observed by inspectors to be marked with unique ID numbers, traceable to their original shipments. Satisfactory

16 For the MgO needed for high CPR, are there procedures or

documentation for the WHE or WHM (or other appropriate personnel) identifying when and

where additional MgO is needed? Yes. General procedures are found in the WIPP Waste Handling Operation WDS User’s Manual, WP 05–WH.02, Attachment 1, Special Requirements for Additional MgO. Section 3 of WP 05-WH1025 calls for notification of the WHM if daily reports show the MgO safety factor of a room to be less than 1.2. Satisfactory

17 Is there documentation that

identifies how MgO should be placed with high CPR waste? Yes. WP 05-WH1025, CH Waste Downloading and Emplacement, Attachment 3, Supersack/BRT Emplacement Data Sheet; and WP 05-WH1058, CH Waste Handling Abnormal Operations, Sec. 4.0, BRT Emplacement Satisfactory

### 27 18 Verify documentation of procedures for abnormal operating conditions, and documentation of training for contingencies. Abnormal operating and emer gency procedures were reviewed, including but not limited to those listed

below.

WP 04-CO, Conduct of Operations, Rev. 11, identifies notification policies, supervision and training procedures, and required reading (Management Policy 1.30).

WP 02-EC3506, Environmental Incident Reporting, is the Management Control Procedure for reporting releases, and includes statutory requirement charts for

notifications and decision flowcharts.

WP 05-WH1058, CH Waste Handling Abnormal Operations, includes instructions for recovering from a torn slip sheet, moving emplaced waste, returning waste to surface, and emplacing BRTs. Specifies that “Abnormal operations of a large scope (e.g. overpack and retrieval) will have specific plans developed.” WP 05-WH1758, RH Waste Handling Abnormal Operations, includes instructions for operating the Hot Cell Crane in response to a hoist, trolley, bridge or grapple failure, installing and removing the Waste Transfer Machine Assembly (WTMA) wheels, retrieving a loaded RH –TRU 72-B Cask from the Transfer Cell, returning a loaded 10-160B Cask to a generator site and resetting the Transfer Cell Light

Curtain.

WP 12-9, WIPP Emergency Management Program, is the top-level document outlining emergency response procedures and responsibilities, includes training requirements for response roles.

WP 05-WH4401, Waste Handler Operator Event Response, includes alarm, alert, and exit procedures.

WP 12-ER3906, Categorization and Classification of Operational Emergencies includes tables of procedures for emergency notifications and

classification of events.

WP 12-HP4000, Emergency Radiological Control Responses, provides guidance for responding to an actual or suspected breach of a TRU container, contamination found outside controlled areas, radiation levels exceeding the limits set in WP 12-5. Satisfactory

# Question : Records/WDS

Do the characterization module, certification module, shipping module, and inventory module adequately record required

information? WWIS modules have been replaced by WDS Dashboards. Reports available through the EPA Dashboard contain the container number, shipment number, emplacement data and underground location. EPA staff queried the WDS to verify that this information is recorded correctly. Satisfactory

### 28 19 Does the WDS adequately document waste shipment and emplacements information for waste containers selected? (Item 3 above) CH, RH Yes. Canister, Overpack, and Container Data Reports were retrieved, all of which correctly reflected container number, shipment number, and emplacement information in the underground. Satisfactory

20 Do records verify that contact

handled waste container surface doses fall within statutory requirements? Where are CH

surface dose records maintained? Yes. CH surface dose measurements are recorded in the Container Data Report. Dose limits for each of the containers examined by EPA inspectors (listed in Item 3) were below statutory limits. Satisfactory

21 Review a Waste Container Data Report. Does this report adequately record the Waste

Stream Profile Form information? Yes. For all containers inspected, inspectors found Container and Canister Data Reports to contain Waste Stream IDs, as well as all necessary radiological and chemical profile information. Satisfactory

22 Review the Shipment Summary Report. Does the report correctly record the containers shipped? CH, RH By querying the Shipment number, the Shipment Data report may be generated. Inspectors verified that the report reflects the containers shipped. Satisfactory

23 Review the Waste Emplacement Report. Does this report adequately record the date of receipt, and disposal locations of containers? CH, RH Yes. See Item 21. Satisfactory

24 Is DOE assuring that the 1.2 safety factor being maintained on

a room basis?

Does the WDS accurately calculate the safety factor and recommend the proper amount of MgO to emplace? Yes. See questions 12-17.

EPA inspectors reviewed InSEI Matrix Requirements WWIS2-REQ-2126 and -2127 to verify that the WDS software calculates MgO excess appropriately.

## Summary of Waste Emplacement Inventory Report Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

Page 1 of 4



### Report Statistics

Report Version: 1.1

WDS Instance: prd01.wipp.carlsbad.nm.us

Generated on: July 01, 2010 00.08 PM

Generated by: STRUMM

Total Pages: 4

Selection Criteria

End Date: 07/01/2010

Panel Number: All

Room Number: All

## Summary of Waste Emplacement Inventory Report STRUMM

July 01, 2010 00.08 PM
Page 2 of 4 

## Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

Total 68,717.64 (m^3) 

### Panel: All Room: All TRU Waste Inventory as of 07/01/2010

Emplaced CH Containers 68,526.83 (m^3)



### Emplaced RH Containers 190.81 (m^3)



### Emplaced Container Counts as of 07/01/2010

Description # of Containers 

### Panel: All Room: All

Contact Handled (CH) Container Types

100-GALLON DRUM 24,142

12-INCH PIPE OVERPACK 23,805

55-GALLON DRUM 71,577

85-GALLON DRUM - TALL - OVERPACK 5

S100 PIPE OVERPACK 319

S300 PIPE OVERPACK 10

STANDARD WASTE BOX 4,856

STANDARD WASTE BOX - OVERPACK 3,911

TEN DRUM OVERPACK - OVERPACK 5,060

Remote Handled (RH) Container Types

FIXED-LID 72-B CANISTER 18

REMOVABLE-LID 72-B CANISTER 1

REMOVABLE-LID 72-B CANISTER - OVERPACK 358

Total: 134,062

## Summary of Waste Emplacement Inventory Report STRUMM

July 01, 2010 00.08 PM
Page 3 of 4 

## Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

Material Parameter Inventory

Material Type Weight (kg) 

### Panel: All Room: All

CELLULOSIC, PLASTIC, RUBBER (CPR) 7,100,273

FERROUS METAL 20,210,004

NON-FERROUS METAL 341,657

OTHER MATERIAL 9,895,279

Total: 37,547,213



### EPA-Tracked Radiological Activity Inventory

as of 07/01/2010

Radionuclide Repository CH Activity (Ci) Repository RH Activity (Ci) Total Repository Activity (Ci) 

### Panel: All Room: All

AM-241 2.021E5 1.495E2 2.023E5

CS-137 5.3E0 1.753E3 1.759E3

PU-238 2.725E5 6.571E1 2.725E5

PU-239 2.913E5 9.739E1 2.914E5

PU-240 7.105E4 6.61E1 7.112E4

PU-242 1.44E1 9.375E-2 1.45E1

SR-90 1.086E1 1.362E3 1.373E3

U-233 4.703E0 1.354E-1 4.839E0

U-234 4.61E1 2.778E-1 4.638E1

U-238 1.19E1 6.035E-3 1.191E1

Total 8.371E5 3.495E3 8.406E5

## Summary of Waste Emplacement Inventory Report STRUMM

July 01, 2010 00.08 PM
Page 4 of 4 

## Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

MgO-Related Information as of 07/01/2010

Panel Room MgO (kg) Waste (kg) CPR (kg) Excess Factor 

### Panel: All Room: All

1 7 1,127,526 508,254 267,771 2.01

1 6 222,885 101,210 85,308 1.44

1 5 222,885 160,047 78,406 1.56

1 4 228,600 128,597 84,697 1.51

1 3 1,034,415 749,764 338,322 1.67

1 2 1,028,825 948,002 225,711 2.17

1 1 617,220 311,843 136,095 2.14

2 7 1,028,700 571,001 233,104 2.09

2 6 982,980 461,528 205,745 2.20

2 5 988,820 498,970 194,393 2.28

2 4 977,265 518,555 217,372 2.17

2 3 1,028,700 667,662 208,115 2.27

2 2 965,835 733,025 161,914 2.62

2 1 691,515 416,679 183,964 1.71

3 7 960,120 711,188 106,207 3.83

3 6 954,405 876,558 226,189 1.93

3 5 1,022,985 808,693 280,945 1.70

3 4 960,120 899,470 251,694 1.79

3 3 931,545 1,000,561 240,486 1.89

3 2 944,880 1,004,479 224,651 2.03

3 1 662,940 722,043 180,687 1.76

4 7 942,975 1,051,062 245,488 1.90

4 6 925,830 945,599 264,141 1.71

4 5 946,785 890,039 261,866 1.71

4 4 1,013,460 830,990 286,937 1.70

4 3 1,015,365 745,955 282,077 1.70

4 2 931,545 933,179 372,843 1.22

4 1 668,655 554,822 265,884 1.23

5 7 939,165 982,045 353,269 1.29

5 6 875,477 1,085,549 140,009 2.85

5 5 782,346 1,121,745 298,808 1.24

5 4 663,698 929,185 200,361 1.67

5 3 0 8,494 3,349 0.00

5 2 0 1,452 801 0.00Documents Received and Reviewed During InspectionDocument TitleSubject MatterWP12-HP1500, Rev. 11, Radiological Posting and AccessControl,12/14/06Technical Procedure for posting areas according to levels ofradiation/contamination and access.WP 12-HP4000, Rev. 5, Emergency Radiological ControlResponses,8/8/05Emergency and Alarm Personnel Response ProcedureWP 12-HP3500, Rev. 16, Airborne Radioactivity, 12/04/08 Technical Procedure for analyzing and reporting results ofparticualte air samplesWP 12-HP3400, Rev. 8, Contamination Control, 2/20/09 Management Control Procedure for control containment, anddecontamination.WP 12-HP2001, Rev. 3, Abnormal Radiological Conditions,8/23/06Abnormal Operating Procedure for out of calibration surveyinstruments, lost TLD, loss of control of radioactive material,low energy gamma monitor alarms, or excedance of permitteddose limit.WP 12-HP1100, Rev.12, Radiological Surveys, 7/31/08 Technical Procedure for meter/swipe use, including examplesurveyreports as attachments.WP 12-ER4903 Rev. 13, Radiological Event Response, 2/27/09 Emergency Response Procedure for CAM radiation alarm, wastehandling accident, structural failure in active emplacement area,removable contamination 100 times set limit.WP 12-ER4902, Rev. 12, Hazardous Material Spill and ReleaseRespon,2/02/09Emergency Response Procedure for RCRA event.WP 12-ER3906, Rev. 1, Categorization and Classification ofOperational Emergencies,12/5/08Mangement Control Procedure for classifying emergency andbeginningnotification within fiteen minutes.WP 12-9, Rev. 29, WIPP Emergency Management Program,7/31/08Comprehensive overview of emergency response, notifications,and reentry.WP 08-NT3020, Rev. 18, TRU Waste Receipt, 6/9/09, 36 pp. Management Control Procedure for reciept of TRU and mixedwastes, performed by Transportation Engineer. Sets storage andtime limits for initial processing. Uses 'WDS/WWIS.'WP 08-NT.07, Rev. 6, Waste Data System Software DesignDescription*,12/14/09,17pp.Top level summary of software design and components. Heavilyrewritten to reflect WDS changeover.Documents Received and Reviewed During InspectionDocument TitleSubject MatterWP 08-NT.06, Rev. 6, Waste Data System SoftwareRequirements Specification*, 12/14/09, 30pp.Summarizes requirements, functions, user roles, constraints, andassumptions of the WWIS. Sec 5.1 clearly defines WWIS/WDSrelationship.WP 08-NT.05, Rev. 7, Waste Data System Software Verificationand Validation Plan*, 5/25/10, 16pp.Verification and Validation activities through all life phases ofthe WDS. Title updated. No other major changes from 2009.WP 08-NT.04, Rev. 15, Waste Data System ConfigurationManagement and SoftwareQA Program*,12/17/09,26pp.Delineates QC/Data management responsibilities for all WDSusers,accountingand documentaitonprocedures.WP 08-NT.03, Rev. 11, Waste Stream Profile Form Review andApproval Program, 12/10/2009, 17pp.Review procedures for assuring compliance with HazardousWaste Facilities Permit Waste Analysis Plan, and WIPP WasteAcceptance Criteria, enumerating minimum reviews for eachapproval. Explains that WWIS is a subset of WDS.WP 08-NT.01, Rev. 21 Waste Data System Program and DataManagement Plan, 4/14/10Operational overview of WWIS, including regulatoryrequirements, process, and user responsibilities. Ties WDSfunctions to regulatoryrequirements.WP 05-WH4401, Rev. 3, Waste Handling Operator EventResponse,3/21/01Emergency Procedure for CAM alarms, fire, smoke, toxic gas,structural issues,or spill/release.WP 05-WH1810, Rev. 12 Underground Transuranic MixedWaste Disposal Area Inspections, 6/24/09, 10pp.Technical Procedure for Preoperational Underground TRUMixed Waste Dispsoal Area Inspections. Inspection checklistsincluded in two attachments. Minor updates to reflectconsolidated DSA/TSR.WP 05-WH1758, Rev. 7, RH Waste Handling AbnormalOperations, 12/17/09, 50ppTechnical Procedure for operation of the Hot Cell Crane inrespose to a hoist, trolley, bridge or grapple failure, installingand removing the the Waste transfer Machine Assembly(WTMA) wheels, retrieving a loaded RH –TRU 72-B Cask fromthe Transfer Cell, returning a loaded 10-160B Cask to agenerator site, or resetting the Transfer Cell Light Curtain.Minor updates reflect WDS, reference LCOsWP 05-WH1752, Rev. 4, 10-160B Shielded Insert Installationand Removal,2/05/09Technical Procedure. CNS 10-160B cask not yet in use at timeof inspection. CCTV use stipulated.Documents Received and Reviewed During InspectionDocument TitleSubject MatterWP 05-WH1744, Rev. 11, Surface RH Transuranic MixedWaste Handling Area Inspections, 12/17/2009, 20pp.Technical Procedure for RH WHT/WHE to inspect abovegroundRH operations. Preoperational Inspection, Daily Door Check,Trailer Parlking Area and RH Container Storage Area WeeklyInspection, RH Waste Handling Preoperational Inspectionchecklists included as attachments. No major changes in 2010WP 05-WH1729, Rev 9, RH-TRU 72-B Cask Uprighting TrailerUnloading,5/20/10,22pp.See above.WP 05-WH1727, Rev. 8, RH-TRU 72-B Cask UprightingTrailer Loading,5/20/10,20pp.Distinct trailer from the mechanically-operated trailer whichrequires the bridge crane.WP 05-WH1726, Rev. 0, RH Waste Downloading/EmplacementUsing Distributed Controls, 1/19/10, 25pp.Distinction from WH1725 is unclearWP 05-WH1725, Rev. 5, RH waste Downloading andEmplacement, 3/11/10, 25pp.Technical Procedure for RH operations in the underground.Includes paper RH Waste Processing Data Sheet. LCOsreferenced bynumber.WP 05-WH1722, Rev 11, 10-160B RH Processing, 12/17/09,35pp.Technical procedure for unloading the CNS 10-160Bandcanisterizing drums into the facility canister. CCTV "ifnecessary" - 13.0,14.0Reviewed 6/9/10 JPWWP 05-WH1718, Rev. 6, CNS 10-160B Trailer Unloading,2/19/09Technical procedure. CNS 10-160B cask not yet in use at timeof inspection.WP 05-WH1717, Rev. 8, Cask Unloading Room Shield DoorOperation,6/24/09,7pp.Continuous Use Procedure for operating the CUR shield door.Minor updates reflect consolidated DSA/TSR.WP 05-WH1716, Rev. 4, CNS 10-160B Cask Operation,6/24/09, 10pp.Technical Procedure for opening 10-160B cask. Includes caskdata sheet. CNS 10-160B cask not yet in use at time ofinspection.WP 05-WH1714, Rev. 3, RH Cask Preparation Station 41-Z076,3/18/10,6pp.Technical Procedure for preoperational checks of the RH CPS.Pertinent to 10-160B.WP 05-WH1713, Rev. 9, Facility Cask and Facility CaskRotating Device, 6/24/09, 13pp.Technical Procedure for inspection and preoperational checksofRH Facility Cask, FC Rotating Device, and Hydraulic PowerUnit. Minor updates reflect consilidated DSA/TSR.Documents Received and Reviewed During InspectionDocument TitleSubject MatterWP 05-WH1712, Rev.3, RH-TRU 72-B Cask Operation,5/20/10,10pp.Technical procedure for opening 72-B Cask. No major changesin 2010.WP 05-WH1710, Rev. 20, 72-B RH Processing, 6/2/10, 38pp. Technical Procedure for unloading the 72-B Shipping containerand preparing for dowloading to the underground. Fullyrevised, WHE Review added. Also see Section 3.3: CCTVrecordingWP 05-WH1709, Rev. 13, Rh-TRU 72-B Trailer Unloading,5/20/10Technical Procedure for unloading RH-TRU 72-B fromincoming trailer to Cask Transfer Car or storage rack. Npomajor changes in 2010.WP 05-WH1707, Rev. 9, RH-TRU 72-B Trailer Loading,6/24/09,14pp.Technical Procedure for loading RH-TRU 72-B for transport.WP 05-WH1705, Rev. 8, RH Canister Transfer System, 6/24/09,12pp.Technical Procedure detailing preoperational equipment checksprior to RH waste-handling. 72-B or 10-160B. CCTV forcanister transfer system(sectoion 2.0)WP 05-WH1705, Rev. 7, RH Canister Transfer System,2/17/09 Technical Procedure for inspection and preoperational checks ofRH handling equipment. Minimal changes to reflectconsolidated references (RH/CH DSAs and TSRs) Reviewed6/18/10 JPWWP 05-WH1704, Rev. 7, Facility Cask Transfer Car (41-H-003)Operation,4/17/09Technical Procedure for Facility Cask Transfer Car inspectionand RH waste handling- no change in 2010.WP 05-WH1701, Rev. 10, Road Cask Transfer Car Operation,2/20/09Technical Procedure for inspection and properational check ofThe 72-B Road Cask Transfer Car - no change in 2010.WP 05-WH1700, Rev. 7, Horizontal Emplacement and RetrievalEquipment Assembly, 6/24/10, 17pp.Technical Procedure for setting up the HERE in preparation forRH canister emplacement. Rewritten to highlight TSRs, LCOs,and SACs byLCO/SAC number.WP 05-WH1105, Rev. 3, Magnesium Oxide Sample RecordsManagement, 4/19/10, 10 pp.Management Control Procedure for the laboratry verification ofMgO reactivity. Example MgO Tracking Spreadsheet andRequest for Analysis included as attachments 1 and 2. No majorchanges in 2010.Documents Received and Reviewed During InspectionDocument TitleSubject MatterWP 05-WH1058, Rev. 5, CH Waste Handling AbnormalOperations, 6/2/10, 14pp.Technical Procedure including instructions for recovering forma torn slip sheet, movement of emplaced waste, returing weasteto surface, and emplacement of BRTs. Added noncompliantcontainer response, covering filters on assemblies contining highVOCs, and section on WHE review.WP 05-WH1025, Rev. 2 CH Downloading and Emplacement,12/17/01, 19 pp.Technical Procedure including paper forms for recording CHDownloading and MgO/BRT placment as attachments. Updatedto reflect both WWIS/WDS.WP 05-WH1011, Rev. 37, CH Waste Processing, 3/02/10, 32pp. Continous Use proceedure for unloading TRUPACT-II orHalfPACT. Contains forms and sign-offs. Edited to referenceWDS, and add LCOs. Section 2.5.31 deals with VOCs.WP 05-WH1010, Rev. 6, Container Overpacking, 12/17/09,24pp.Technical Procedure for the overpacking of contaminated ordamaged containers in 85-gallon drum, SWB, or TDOP.Contains documentation for procedure. Updated to reference edWP 05-1025 CH Waste Downloading and Emplacement,DSA/TSR,andWDSWP 05-WH.02, Rev. 0, WIPP Waste Handling Operations WDSUser's Manual, 12/17/09, 39pp.Replaces WP 05-WH.01, Rev. 4, WIPP Waste HandlingOperations WWIS Users Manual. For use by Waste HandlingTechnicians and Waste Handling Engineers. Updated to reflectWDS changeover.WP 04-CO, Rev. 11, Conduct of Operations, 10/01/08 Facility operating practices, including shift routines,communications, inspections, training. Minimal changes toreflect consolidated references (RH/CH DSAs and TSRs) Alsodocument revision control.WP 02-EC3506, Rev. 5, Environmental Incident Reporting,2/26/07Management Control Procedure for reporting releases, includingstatutory requirement charts and decision flowcharts.WP 02-EC1001, Rev. 8, Characterization Sampling, Shipping,and Documentation,6/30/08Technical procedure for waste characterization field sampling.Documents Received and Reviewed During InspectionDocument TitleSubject MatterSpecification D-0101, Rev. 8, Prepackaged MgO Backfill,2/11/09Includes analytical methods to ensure reactivity, and AnalysisRequest/Chain of custodyforms.DOE/WIPP-09-3427, Waste Data System User's Manual, U.S.DOE, Rev. 0, 12/2009, 202pp.Replaces DOE/CBFO-97-2273, Rev. 15, WIPP WasteInformation System User's Manual, WWIS Software Version6.2, 5/2008. Comprehensive guide for all WWIS users,including automated parameters to verify compliance ofcontainers and shipments with transportaion and emplacementrequirements.* denotes title updated to reflect WDS changeoverDocuments Received/Generated DuringInspectionLA04 Canister Report, Generated 6/30/2010LA013 Canister Report, Generated 6/30/2010LA03 Canister Report, Generated 6/30/2010BN10287121, Container Report, Generated 6/30/2010NT070679R Container Report, Generated 6/30/2010BN10278350 Container Report, Generated 6/30/2010BN10267854 Container Report, Generated 6/30/2010InSEI Matrix RequirementWWIS2-REQ-2126 - MgO balancecalculationInSEI Matrix Requirement WWIS2-REQ-2127 - MgO balancecalculationBN10363651 Container Report, Generated 6/30/2010BN10218018 Container Report, Generated 6/30/2010BN10368262 Container Report, Generated 6/30/2010LAS892993 Container Report, Generated 6/30/2010AE006 Canister Report, Generated 6/30/2010ID0209 Canister Report Generated 6/30/2010Panel 5 Room 4 Daily Report Generated 7/1/2010Summary of Waste Emplacement Inventory Report, Generated7/1/2010Documents Received and Reviewed During InspectionDocument TitleSubject MatterMaterials Emplaced in WIPP as of June 30, 2010. Ad Hoc queryperformed byWDS staff,7/2/2010Emplacement Inspection June 2010 DOEDocumentsReviewedSourceReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/18/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/18/10 JPWDOE/WIPPEmplacement Inspection June 2010 DOEDocumentsReviewedSourceReviewed 6/18/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/18/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/18/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/18/2010 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/17/10.DOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPEmplacement Inspection June 2010 DOEDocumentsReviewedSourceReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWReviewed 6/9/10 JPWReviewed 6/9/10 JPWReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPEmplacement Inspection June 2010 DOEDocumentsReviewedSourceReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPEmplacement Inspection June 2010 DOEDocumentsReviewedSourceReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPW DOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/17/10JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/9/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 7/2009 JPWDOE/WIPPEmplacement Inspection June 2010 DOEDocumentsReviewedSourceReviewed 6/17/10 JPWDOE/WIPPReviewed 6/18/10 JPWDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPDOE/WIPPEmplacement Inspection June 2010 DOEDocumentsReviewedSource