alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of ETFS Gold Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Burgess,
principal financial officer of ETF Securities USA LLC, the Sponsor of the
Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Trust.

|                                      |                |  | 
|------------------------------------- | -------------- |  | 
|/s/ Greg
Burgess                      |                | 
|                                      | *              | 
|Greg
Burgess**                        |                | 
|Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer |                | 
|(principal
financial officer)         |                | 
|                                      |                |  | 
|Date:                                 | March 30,
2010 |  | 

|   |                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|*  | The
originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Sponsors offices and will be made available for
inspection upon request.
|   |                                                                                                                                                       
|** | The
Registrant is a trust and Mr. Burgess is signing in his capacity as an
officer of ETF Securities USA LLC, the sponsor of
the Trust.               

---
F ILED U.S. CO URT OF AP P EALS ELEVENTH CI RCUIT Oc tob er 31, 2 008 THO MAS K . KAHN CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 0 7- 12 12 4

__ __ __ __ __ __ _ D.C. Dock etNo. 0 5- 00 24 7 C R-T-2 3- MAP
UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pla in ti ff-Ap pe ll ee,

ve rs us SCOTT SCHWEICKERT, a.k .a. Ms trS co tt , Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ (Oc to ber 3 1, 2 00 8)
Befo re ANDERSON, BARKETT andHILL, Circu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:In a th ree- co un t i nd ic tm en t, a fe de ral gra ndjury ch arg edSco ttSch weic ke rt

wit h c on sp ira cy

to po ss es s a c on tro ll edsubs ta nc e, ga m m a-h y dr ox y

bu tyric ac id , (GHB), wit h i nt en t t o d is tri bu te itto ot he rs wit ho utth ei r kn owl ed ge an d wi th in te ntto co m

m ita cri m e o f vi ol en ce, i n v io la ti on of 2 1 U.S.C. § § 8 46 an d 84 1( b) (7 )(A) an d (B ) (Co un t On e), an d d idkn owi ng ly andin te nt io na ll y di st rib ut e fo r hu m anco ns um

pt io n GHB t o Vi ct im s # 1 a nd#2 , wit ho utth ei r kn owl ed ge an d wit h t he in te ntto co m

m ita cri m e o f vi ol en ce, i n v io la ti on of 2 1 U.S.C. § § 84 1( a)(1 ) an d 8 41 (b )(7 )(A), (B) , and18 U.S.C. § 2 (Co un ts Two an d Th ree) . A jury fou ndSch weic ke rt g ui lt y of c on sp ira cy

wit h S te ve n Lo ren zo (Co un t On e) an d di st rib ut io n o f GHB to Vict im #2 (Co un t Th ree) . Sch weic ke rt wa s ac qu it te d o n Co un t Two pe rta in in g t o Vi ct im #1 . The d is tri ctco ur t s en te nc edhi m to serve
co ns ecu ti ve term s o f twe nt y y ears ’ im pr is on m en t o n e ach co un t o f co nv ic ti on , or fo rty y ears . Sch weic ke rt n ow ra is es fiv e ev id en ti ary is su es on ap pe al . He als o ra is es a si xt h i ss ue th atth ere was in su ffi ci en t ev id en ce t o s us ta in hi s co nv ic ti on . Afte r or al arg um en t an d c aref ul co ns id erat io n, we fi ndth atth e d is tri ctco urt di d n otab us e it s d is cret io n o r pl ai nl y err i n i ts ev id en ti ary ru li ng s. Th e
ev id en ti ary arg um en ts rai se d o n app eal are wh ol ly w it ho utm eri t an d re jecte d

2wit ho utne edforfur th er d is cu ss io n. 1

In ad di ti on , we con cl ud e th atth ere was am pl e an d s uf

fic ie ntev id en ce o f Scwei ck ert ’s con sp ira cy

wit h Lo ren zo an d h is pa rti ci pa ti on inth e d ru g di st rib ut io n o f GHB to supp or t t he jury’ s v erd ic t o f co nv ic ti on of S cwei ck erton Co un ts One a ndThre e. AFFIR MED.

They are , that the cour

t erre d (1) in deny

ing Schw eicke rt’s motion to suppress cer tain 1 statements; (2) in admitting inter net chats made by

co-c onspirator L orenzo; (3) in admitting photos of L orenzo and Schwe icker t; (4) in admitting interne t chats made betwee n L orenzo and Schweicke rt; and (5) in not gr antinga new trial based on c umulative evidentiar y err ors. 3
| (1)   | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  December 10, 2010 |                                          | STRONGBOW RESOURCES INC                   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |                                      |   |
|                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | /s/ Herbert Schmidt                       |   |
|                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | Herbert Schmidt,                          |   |
|                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | Principal Executive and Financial Officer |   |
Mario COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 106060

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: February 19, 2019

Susan L. Hogan, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64105, for appellant.

Eric S. Schmitt, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Mario Coleman (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 19, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 19, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0062. BELLA - JANE SCHANDORFF - COLES f/k/a JANE E. COLES v. CLEO P. 

COLES III.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

21A01907
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,446]


Glaxosmithkline, Pilot Plant, Collegeville, PA; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 2, 2009, in response to a worker 
petition filed on behalf of workers at GlaxoSmithKline, Pilot Plant, 
Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6534 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sedrick Anthony Daughtery, * From the 350th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 14172-D.

Vs. No. 11-22-00347-CR * June 6, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
---

EXHIBIT 32


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and


Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





We hereby certify that the foregoing Form 10-K of Embassy Bancorp, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2009 complies in all respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Embassy Bancorp, Inc.





/s/ David M. Lobach Jr.DAVID M. LOBACH, JR.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Judith A. HunsickerJUDITH A. HUNSICKERSenior Executive Vice President,Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial Officer





Dated: March 31, 2010
----

Action brought on 3 March 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Austria

(Case C-109/05)

(2005/C 132/24)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Republic of Austria was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 3 March 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Minas Konstantinidis and Bernard Schima, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The provision of the Austrian regulation on end-of-life vehicles stating that manufacturers or importers have to take back end-of-life vehicles of those makes which they have put into circulation, in so far as those vehicles were registered in Austria, infringes Article 5 of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000.

The directive obliges the Member States to set up return systems in such a way that all end-of-life vehicles are taken back irrespective of their make and establishes an obligation to take back end-of-life vehicles free of charge. These objectives are not achieved by the Austrian legislation since it has a dual restriction: the obligation to take vehicles back is limited to makes which the relevant manufacturer or importer has put into circulation, and it is limited to vehicles registered in Austria.

The Commission is unable to subscribe to the view of the Republic of Austria that the distinction drawn on the basis of registration in Austria is objectively justified because that is the only way of avoiding a disproportionately heavy burden being placed on individual manufacturers by the obligation to take vehicles back. It states, on the contrary, that if it should turn out in practice that a disproportionate burden is placed on individual manufacturers or importers or the collectors in a Member State because end-of-life vehicles registered abroad are taken back free of charge, account is to be taken of that within the framework of the procedure under the fourth subparagraph of Article 5(4). This provision states that the Commission is to monitor regularly implementation of the obligation to take vehicles back in order to ensure that it does not result in market distortions.

----

(1)OJ L 269, 21.10.2000, p. 34.

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Greyhound Commissary, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Geoff Williams, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   Geoff Williams





Geoff Williams


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Accounting Officer


January 12, 2011











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
[No. 52786-0-I.

Division One.

June 1, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Douglas Ray Cline, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, Nos. 01-1-00972-6 and 01-1-00970-0, James J. Stonier, J., entered April 2 and 4, 2002. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 13.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











In connection with this Annual Report of Ocean Rig UDW Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jan Rune Steinsland, Chief Financial Officer of Ocean Rig AS, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: March 13, 2012














/s/ Jan Rune Steinsland


Jan Rune Steinsland


Chief Financial Officer of Ocean Rig AS (Principal Financial Officer)
## 1997 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

6-12-1997 

# M a r t in v . D a n a C or p

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :
D ock e t 96-1746



## F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1997 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" M a r t in v . D a n a C or p " (1997). 1997 D e cisio n s
. P a pe r 129. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997/129

### Filed September 12, 1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 96

- 1746
KEEFE M. MARTIN,

Appellant

v.

DANA CORPORATION On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvani a (D.C. No. 95

- cv - 08024)
Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, and McKEE, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R A majority of the active judges having voted, it is

O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the order filed July 1, 1997 granting rehearing en banc and refer the case to the original panel for panel rehearing, the original panel having so voted.

By the Court,
/s/ Dolores K. Slovit er Chief Judge
Dated: 9/12/97
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen J. Fanning, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Thermage, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Thermage, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen J. Fanning
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                  |  | Stephen J. Fanning                   
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

I, John F. Glenn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Thermage, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Thermage, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John F. Glenn
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             |  | John F. Glenn          
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:            |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Section 302 Certification**

 

I, Lance Black, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-20 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.              Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.              All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:   The Bank of New York Mellon and its officers and agents.

 
| Date:   March 20, 2015 |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   |
|                                       |   |   |   |
|  By:                                  |   | /s/  LANCE   BLACK |   |
|                                       |   | Name:   Lance Black |   |
|                                       |   | Title:   Senior Vice President and Treasurer |   |
|                                       |   | of   Protective Life Insurance Company (as depositor) |   |

 

----