alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

I Mitteilungen

Rechnungshof

----

STELLUNGNAHME Nr. 3/2005

zu dem Entwurf der Verordnung der Kommission zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 2342/2002 vom 23. Dezember 2002 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 1605/2002 des Rates vom 25. Juni 2002 über die Haushaltsordnung für den Gesamthaushaltsplan der Europäischen Gemeinschaften

(vorgelegt gemäß Artikel 279 des EG-Vertrags)

(2005/C 124/01)

DER RECHNUNGSHOF DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN —

gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, insbesondere auf Artikel 248 Absatz 4 und Artikel 279,

gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Atomgemeinschaft, insbesondere auf Artikel 160c Absatz 4 und Artikel 183,

gestützt auf die Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 1605/2002 des Rates vom 25. Juni 2002 über die Haushaltsordnung für den Gesamthaushaltsplan der Europäischen Gemeinschaften (1),

gestützt auf die Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 2342/2002 der Kommission vom 23. Dezember 2002 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 1605/2002 des Rates (2),

gestützt auf den Entwurf der Verordnung der Kommission zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 2342/2002 der Kommission (3),

gestützt auf das Ersuchen der Kommission um Stellungnahme des Hofes zu diesem Entwurf vom 6. Januar 2005,

in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:

Durch die Richtlinie 2004/18/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 31. März 2004 über die Koordinierung der Verfahren zur Vergabe öffentlicher Bauaufträge, Lieferaufträge und Dienstleistungsaufträge (4) wurden die bislang geltenden Richtlinienbestimmungen abgeändert und konsolidiert.

Erklärtes Ziel der Kommission ist, die Bestimmungen der neuen Richtlinie umzusetzen sowie die Verwaltung von Aufträgen und Finanzhilfen zu vereinfachen, insbesondere wenn es um nur geringe Werte oder Beträge geht —

HAT FOLGENDE STELLUNGNAHME ANGENOMMEN:

EINLEITUNG

EINHALTUNG DER GRUNDSÄTZE DER WIRTSCHAFTLICHEN HAUSHALTSFÜHRUNG

VEREINFACHTE VERFAHREN UND REIBUNGSLOSE ANWENDUNG

KORREKTE UMSETZUNG DER RICHTLINIE ZUR ÖFFENTLICHEN AUFTRAGSVERGABE

ÜBEREINSTIMMUNG DER VORGESCHLAGENEN ÄNDERUNGEN MIT DEN IN DER HAUSHALTSORDNUNG NIEDERGELEGTEN GRUNDSÄTZEN UND RECHTSNORMEN

Vergabeverfahren

Kriterien für die Auswahl von Bewerbern/Bietern

Diese Stellungnahme wurde vom Rechnungshof in seiner Sitzung vom 17. März 2005 in Luxemburg angenommen.

Für den Rechnungshof

Hubert WEBER

Präsident

----

(1)ABl. L 248 vom 16.9.2002, geändert im ABl. L 25 vom 30.1.2003, S. 43.

(2)ABl. L 357 vom 31.12.2002, S. 1.

(3)  Kommissionsdokument SEK(2004) 1310.

(4)ABl. L 134 vom 30.4.2004, S. 114.

(5)  Rechtssache C-81/98, Alcatel Austria AG u. a. gegen Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr, Slg. (1999) S. I-7671.

(6)  Erwägungsgrund 1 des Verordnungsentwurfs.

(7)  Gemäß Artikel 91 der Haushaltsordnung werden Aufträge nach einem der folgenden Verfahren ausgeschrieben: a) im offenen Verfahren, b) im nicht offenen Verfahren, c) im Wettbewerbsverfahren und d) im Verhandlungsverfahren.

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT ANTHONY WALKER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 02 3

- 1824

[ November 30, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 00 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fif t eenth J udicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen

, J udge; L.T. Case No s

. 502017 CF 000290AXXXMB and

502017CF000293AXXXMB

.

Robert Anthony Walker

, Milton

, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., L EVINE and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                   |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | /s/ J. Roe Buckley               
|                        |  | Name:                             |  | J. Roe Buckley         
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | Title:                            |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation



20
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 264 

Expressing support for the goals of Workplace Eye Wellness Month by 

promoting the importance of protecting the eyes from increased screen time. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. PAYNE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of Workplace Eye Wellness 

Month by promoting the importance of protecting the 

eyes from increased screen time. 

Whereas the rise of computer usage during the COVID–19 

pandemic has increased cases of digital eye strain. 

Whereas symptoms of digital eye strain, also referred to as 

computer vision syndrome, include tired, burning, or 

itching eyes, dry eyes, blurred vision and/or headache. 

Whereas the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that employers take appropriate 

measures to ensure that their employees are protected 

against potential workplace eye injuries. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 264 IH 

Whereas, to help prevent workplace eye injuries, it is important for individuals to keep the following tips in mind: 

(1) When working at a computer, take breaks every 

15 minutes to relax the eyes. 

(2) Sit about 30 inches away from the screen. 

(3) Review your work space for potential hazards before starting work. 

(4) Wear protective eyewear in areas that pose the 

risk of injury. 

(5) Always use appropriate protective eyewear that 

fits, such as goggles, safety glasses, welding helmets, fullface respirators, or face shields. 

(6) Stay up-to-date on first aid procedures for common workplace injuries and make sure that the first aid 

kit is well stocked. 

(7) Encourage coworkers and new hires to follow all 

safety procedures to prevent workplace eye injuries. 

Whereas March is recognized as Workplace Eye Wellness 

Month. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Workplace 

3 Eye Wellness Month; 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of healthy vision; 

5 and 

6 (3) encourages employees to take precautions to 

7 avoid workplace eye injuries. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Marie A. Taylor, Appellant, v Dallas Ellis, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 570]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated February 10, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of *472Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Both of the defendant’s examining physicians failed to demonstrate that the disc bulges and herniations were not causally related to the accident, or that the injuries were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see *Gray v Lasurdo,*302 AD2d 560 [2003]; *Woods-Smith v Tighe,*291 AD2d 399 [2002]; *Papadonikolakis v First Fid. Leasing Group,*283 AD2d 470 [2001]). Further, both examining physicians failed to set forth the objective tests they performed to support their findings that the plaintiff had no limitation of range of motion (see *Black v Robinson,*305 AD2d 438 [2003]; *Junco v Ranzi,*288 AD2d 440 [2001]).

Therefore, since the defendant failed to establish his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, we need not consider the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s opposition papers (see *Black v Robinson, supra; Junco v Ranzi, supra).*Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50494

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VIRTIS LEE GIBSON;

JAY LAVONE LLOYD,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-96-CR-149-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 2, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Virtis Lee Gibson and Jay Lavone Lloyd appeal their convictions for conspiracy, possession

of cocaine base with intent to distribute, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Gibson

and Lloyd argue t hat t he district court should have suppressed evidence because the affidavit

supporting the search warrant was lacking in probable cause, and Lloyd argues that his incriminat ing** Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

2 statements should have been excluded because the y were made without the benefit of M iranda **

warnings. Both defendants challenge the sufficiency o f the evidence supporting their conspiracy

convictions, and Lloyd also challenges the sufficiency of the eviden ce supporting hi s possessi on

convictions. Gibson argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for

severance, and Lloyd argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying a mistrial based

on the accidental publication to the jury of a police report.

Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we HOLD that the district court did

not err by denying the defendants’ motions to suppress evidence. U nited States v. Pena-Rodriguez

,

110 F.3d 1120, 1129 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied

, 118 S. Ct. 72 (1997); United States v. Broussard

,

80 F.3d 1025, 1034 (5th Cir.), cert. denied

, 117 S. Ct. 264 (199 6). The evi dence supports the

defendants’ convictions. United States v. Jaramillo

, 42 F.3d 920, 923 (5th Cir. 1995). The district

court did not abuse its discretion by denying Gibson’s motion for severance and Lloyd’s motion for

a mistrial. S ee United States v. Tencer , 107 F.3d 1120 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Ramirez

,

963 F.2d 693, 699 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TradeOn, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, as the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated: December 18, 2009
                              /s/ Moshe Basson
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Moshe Basson
                              Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joseph McSherry,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to  Optigenex  Inc.  and will be retained by  Optigenex  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                                  /s/ JOSEPH MCSHERRY
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Joseph McSherry
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  August 19, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,044]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 12, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, Evart, Michigan.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6521 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Reed J. Killion, President andPrincipal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

·                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

·                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  |   | August 10, 2007 | By:    |   | /s/ Reed J. Killion                                         |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |            |   |   | Reed J. Killion, President and Principal Executive  Officer |

 

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and will be retained byUni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.  The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and shall not be deemed  filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.*

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Buyrite Club Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Judith Adelstein,
President, Director, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Judith Adelstein
------------------------
Judith Adelstein, President, Director,
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

December 18, 2009
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12905-12906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6529]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,185]

Victor Insulators, Inc., Victor, NY; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in 
response to a petition filed

[[Page 12906]]

by a company official on behalf of workers of Victor Insulators, Inc., 
Victor, New York.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6529 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
Mary Jane KRUGH, in Her Individual Capacity and as Trustee of the Mary Jane Krugh Trust Agreement Dated June 16, 1992, as Subsequently Amended and Restated, et al., Respondents, v. John Adam KRUGH, IV, Appellant.

WD 81929

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: June 18, 2019

John Roe, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Colin Stoner, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Appellant.

Joseph Bant, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Robert Tormohlen, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, and Edward R. Ardini, Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Mr. John Adam Krugh, IV appeals a Jackson County Circuit Court judgment confirming a partition sale of the property at 5029 Sunset Drive Kansas City, Missouri 64112, allowing reimbursement of attorney fees and costs, and ordering disbursement of the partition sale proceeds. For reasons stated in the memorandum *618provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
ex101.htm


    

      April
        11,
        2007

      


      Securities
        and Exchange Commission

      Washington,
        DC 20549

      


      RE:
        VisiTrade, Inc.

      


      Ladies
        and Gentlemen:

      


      Visitrade,
        Inc. has the permission to use our audit opinion November 27, 2007 in the
        Company’s 10-SB filing.

      


      Signed

      


      /S/
        Pollard-Kelley Auditing Services, Inc.

      


      


      Pollard-Kelley
        Auditing Services, Inc.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I,
Michael D. Price, President and Chief Executive Officer of Platinum Underwriters
Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
 
 
 Date:
      July 24, 2008
              /s/  Michael
      D. PriceBy:
      Michael D. PricePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer