alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cornerstone
Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2009
(the "Report"), I, Keith Winchester, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, to
my knowledge certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     A.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     B.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  March 30, 2010                            By: /S/ KEITH WINCHESTER
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Keith Winchester
                                                     Executive Financial Officer
[No. 51728-7-I.

Division One.

May 10, 2004.]

#### Staci Sewell, et al., *Appellants,*v. King County Hospital District No. 2, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-2-19515-8, Bruce W. Hilyer, J., entered November 8, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Baker and Kennedy, JJ.
[No. 21461-3-III.

Division Three.

May 25, 2004.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Catherine Merritt, *Appellant,*and Jerome Focose, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 01-3-01055-5, Paul A. Bastine, J., entered September 5, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Kato, C.J., and Brown, J.
#### Gino P. Damasco, Appellant, v Sidney Berger, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 518]

Order, Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on or about July 24, 2003, affirming an order of Civil Court, New York County (Maria Milin, J.), entered on or about April 26, 2001, which had dismissed the petition in this holdover proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*177Petitioner landlord was precluded from refusing to renew respondent tenant’s lease during an initial abbreviated term contemplated under governing New York City Loft Board Regulations (29 RCNY) § 2-01 (m) (3) (ii), which abbreviated term followed the Loft Board’s order setting the initial legal regulated rent. The owner failed to establish that the tenant received the benefit of a full, rent-stabilized term, as required by the Rent Stabilization Code, where the owner served the tenant with notice of nonrenewal during an initial term that was due to expire less than five months after commencement. Insofar as the New York County Civil Court decisions in *Kaplan v Raab*(NYLJ, Dec. 6, 2000, at 25, col 2) and *Breyre v Halo*(n.o.r., Index No. L&T 100437/00, Mar. 12, 2001) hold to the contrary, the Civil Court correctly declined to follow them.

We have considered petitioner’s additional arguments and find them to be without merit, including his assertion that section 2-01 (m) (3) (ii) is ultra vires and unenforceable due to the Loft Board’s lack of jurisdiction to regulate a unit that has already entered the rent-stabilized system. Concur—Ellerin, J.P., Williams, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:      May 5, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Ramón M. Ruiz-ComasRamón M. Ruiz-ComasPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
Quintin GILLEYLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106227

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: May 7, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Maleaner Harvey, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

For Respondent: JOSH HAWLEY, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Quintin C. Gilleylen ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted after a jury trial of one count of the unclassified felony of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2012). This Court affirmed his conviction in *State v. Quentin Gilleylen*, 482 S.W.3d 482 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report on Form10-K/A of
Hybrid Coating Technologies Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph Kristul, Chief Executive Officer, and principal financial
officer of Hybrid Coating Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) such amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in such amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hybrid
Coating Technologies Inc.

December 20, 2013

/s/ Joseph Kristul-------------------------------Joseph Kristul President and
Chief Executive Officer,(Principal executive officer principal financial and
accounting officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12352-12353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL09-39-000]


FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.; Notice of Filing

March 17, 2009.
    Take notice that on March 4, 2009, FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. 
filed a Petition for Declaratory Order, pursuant to Rule 207 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207 (2008).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for

[[Page 12353]]

review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. 
There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables 
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to 
a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, 
please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c78182958488a9abaea9a294b2b7b7a8b5b387a1a2b5a4e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll 
free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 3, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-6285 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<page>
                                                       EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2005 as filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry, Chief
Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Partnership.








By: /s/ Kevin Perry

Name: 	 Kevin Perry
Title:	 Chief Financial Officer

Date:	 March 31, 2006
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*Baer.

Submitted June 11, 1892.

Decided November 19, 1892.

Intoxicating Liquobs — Mino rs — Indictment.

To make a licensed seller of liquors liable under section 16, c. 32, Code 1887, for selling to a minor, it is not necessary to aver in the indictment that he knew or had reason to believe the person to be a minor.

*C. W. Dai.lr.i/*for plaintiff' in error.

Attorney-General *Alfred Caldwell*for the State.

*I.*— Construction *of s.*16, c. 32 *of the Code*(1887). — -34 W. *2Va. 84; Suth. Stat. Con. § 46, n. 4; 41 Kan. 200; 26 Kan. 731.

*II.*— Journals *are records and can not be attacked by oral evidence.*— Suth. Stat. Con. § 44; 77 Ill. 12; 32 Ark. 496; Cool. Con. Lim. 135; 71 Mo. 266; 98 Ill. 156; 5 Col. 525; 28 Kan. 243;' 55 Mich. 94.

BRANNON, JüDttE : '

The question in this ease is whether an indictment under section 16, c. 32, of the Code (Ed. 1887) against a licensed liquor-seller for selling to a minor should aver that the defendant knew or had reason to believe the person to be a minor.

The ease of *State*v. *Farr,*34 W. Va. 84 (11 S. E. Rep. 737) construes this section, and under it such averment is unnecessary, as a sale to a minor would be an offence, whether the seller .knew or had reason to know of his minority or not. To alter the construction there given we must materially change the collocation of the’words of the statute from that appearing in the statute as published by authority. Such transposition should not be made, unless called for very plainly. We should not overrule our former decision, unless we can give clear and cogent reasons for the change. Confessedly the statute is obscure somewhat; but, if we were to depart from our former decision, the reasoning to support it would be no more satisfactory and free from doubt than the reasoning of the former decision, if that be at all open to question.

We shall therefore adhere to the former adjudication, and especially so, as, since the decision was r’endered, the legislature has amended the section, so that we are led to believe the question is no longer of great importance, as but few cases are dependent upon it. We see no strong reason for reviewing or rediscussing the question.

Judgment fining the defendant is affirmed.

Aeeirmed.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Pepper Rock Resources Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Curtis C. Daye,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated this 29th day of October, 2009.





CURTIS C. DAYECurtis C. DayeChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

[PLATINUM LOGO]                                The Belvedere Building
                                               69 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08
                                               P.O. Box HM 3012
                                               Hamilton HM MX, Bermuda

                                               Tel: (441) 295-7195
                                               Fax: (441) 296-0528

March 12, 2004

William A. Robbie
#3 Seaspray
#1 Palmetto Court
Smiths FL 07 Bermuda

Dear Bill:

         Reference is hereby made to the letter dated July 3, 2002 by and
between St. Paul Re, Inc. and you regarding the terms and conditions of your
employment with St. Paul Re, Inc. or Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd. (the
"Company") and amended on August 16, 2002 (the "Letter Agreement"). This letter
(the "Letter Amendment") amends the Letter Agreement to replace Section 5 in its
entirety with the following:

5.       HOUSING AND CAR ALLOWANCE.

         TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU ESTABLISH A RESIDENCE IN BERMUDA IN CONNECTION
WITH YOUR EMPLOYMENT BY THE COMPANY, YOU WILL BE ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT OF
REASONABLE HOUSING AND LIVING EXPENSES (NOT EXCEEDING $15,000 PER MONTH). IN
ADDITION, BEGINNING APRIL 1, 2004 YOU WILL BE ENTITLED TO A CAR ALLOWANCE OF
$700 PER MONTH.

         All other terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement remain in full
force and effect. This Letter Amendment is intended to be a binding obligation
upon the Company and you. If this Letter Amendment correctly reflects your
understanding, please sign and return one copy to me for the Company's records.

                                       Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.

                                       By: /s/ Gregory E.A. Morrison
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Gregory E.A. Morrison
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

The above Letter Amendment correctly reflects our understanding, and I hereby
confirm my agreement to the same.

/s/ William A. Robbie
------------------------
William A. Robbie
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Walter Reid Green, Jr., as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green, Jr.Walter Reid Green, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate:  August 17, 2010








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sit ting by a ssignmen t. NO. 07-03-0269-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E MARCH 2, 2005

______________________________ JACK N JILL DONUTS, INC., APPELLANT

V. EDWARD LLOYD, IN DIVIDUAL LY AND D /B/A A FRANCHISEE OF JACK N JILL DONUTS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUB BOCK COUNTY; NO. 2002- 519,037; HONORAB LE WILLIA M C. DODS ON, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J. 1 MEMORAND UM OPINION Appellant

Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc. perfected this appeal to challenge the trial court’s judgmentin favor

of appel lee Edward Lloyd, i ndividu ally and d/b/a a franchisee of Jack N2 Although not mentioned in the final ju dgment, E DEB, Ltd . was mad e a party to the

underlying case by Jack N Jill Donuts, Inc.’s live pleading. The final judgment provides that it disposes of all claims and all parties. 2 J ill Don uts. The final judgment recites that Jack N Jill take nothing by its suit and that Edward Lloyd recover attorney’s fees in the amount of $17,500

. Pending before this Court is an agreed judgment by which the parties r eq uest we reverse that portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding Lloyd and EDEB, Ltd. attorney’s fees and render judgment that they t ake nothi ng from Jack N Jill. 2 The parties further requestthat the portion of the judgment holding that Jack N Jill take nothing from Lloyd and EDEB, Ltd. be af

firmed. F inally, the parties agree to bear their own costs. Th e agreed judgment is signed by counsel for all parties. Pursuantto Rule 42.1(a)(2)(A) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure we reverse and rend er in par t and affi rm in part
. To ef fectuate the parties’ agreement, that p ortion of the trial court’s judgment awarding Edward Lloyd, indivi dually and d/b/a a franchisee of Jack N Jill Donuts, and EDEB, Ltd., is r ev ersed and judgment is hereby rendered that they take nothing from Jack N Jill, Donuts, Inc. The portion of the judgment thatJack N Ji ll Don uts, Inc. take nothing against Edward Lloyd, individu ally and d/b/a a franchisee of Jack N Jill Do nuts, and EDEB, L td. is in all othe r respects affirmed. Costs are to beassessed by the pa rty incurr ing them. Don H. Reavis Justice
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-K of China Timber Work
Enterprise, Inc for the year ending July 31, 2009, I, Wong Wa Kei Anthony, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1. Such
yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31, 2009, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July
31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of China Timber Work Enterprise, Inc.




Dated:
      November 10, 2009




China
Timber Work Enterprise Inc




By:
            /s/
      Wong Wa Kei Anthony
              President,
      Secretary,
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Director
U.S.Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary ofTransportation subject: Notice ofCommunication in Docket: DOT-OST-20 1 0-0018 From: The Secretary

To: Renee Wright, Pro ram Manager Docket Management 

# Memorandum

Date: Reply to Attn. of: 

## OCT 

## 19 2011**r--._.~** 0::.:::..)

,......_ In accordance with Departmentrules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the followmg communication. On October 5, 2012, during a call with Senator Patty Murray ofWashington, the Senator expressed her support for the application ofDelta Air Lines to operate between Seattle and Tokyo's Haneda International Airport. I informedthe Senator that, while I appreciated her interest in this case, I could not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the Department. Please place this memorandum in the appropriate file and in the Docket.

CC: Senator Patty Murray
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5618 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5618

To extend the patent term for the badge of the American Legion Women's 
                   Auxiliary, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2006

  Mr. Cannon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the patent term for the badge of the American Legion Women's 
                   Auxiliary, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PATENT TERM EXTENSION FOR THE BADGE OF THE AMERICAN LEGION 
              WOMEN'S AUXILIARY.

    The term of a certain design patent numbered 55,398 (for the badge 
of the American Legion Women's Auxiliary) is renewed and extended for a 
period of 14 years beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, with 
all the rights and privileges pertaining to such patent.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Adonnis SMITH, Appellant.

No. ED 106499

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: June 11, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Adonnis Smith appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was no error in the admission of the child eyewitness's out of court statements and no error *338in failing to sua sponte intervene in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).