alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2





Exhibit 10.2









Veramark Technologies, Inc.

2010 Incentive Plan for Management and Key Employees



Overview




The Veramark Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) 2010 Incentive Plan for Management and Key
Employees (the “Plan”) is a cash bonus that will be paid to the Company’s eligible employees. A
cash bonus pool will be established based upon the Company’s net operating income for the calendar
year 2010. Individual bonuses will be paid from the Cash Bonus Pool up to the amount in the pool.



Authorization and Administration




The Plan is approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and administered by
the Company’s CEO and CFO.



The Compensation Committee will approve the structure of the Plan and will approve the final
determination of the total bonus pool based on the net operating income for the year 2010, as
audited by the Company’s independent auditors.



The President and CEO will determine the allocation to employees of bonus pool funds.



Bonus pool funds will be distributed within 30 days of the approval and filing of the Company’s
2010 annual report on Form 10-K to the Securities Exchange Commission.



Eligibility




Eligible employees will be identified by the President and CEO.



An individual must be a full-time employee of the Company in good standing at the time that the
bonus funds are distributed. There is no accrual provision and all consideration for bonus
payments are forfeited upon termination regardless of reason for such termination, even in the
event the bonus amount was reported to the employee prior to the last day of employment.



Individuals covered by a sales commission plan are not eligible for participation.



The list of eligible employees as of February 22, 2010 (subject to change with hires, terminations,
and job changes):



Ronald C. Lundy, VP and CFO



*** Listing of 12 other non-officer employees redacted for confidentiality reasons



Definitions



“Operating Income” means the Corporation’s net income before extraordinary items, interest, and
taxes, as shown on the Company’s audited financial statements.



Veramark Technologies, Inc.
ž www.veramark.com

 Corporate: 3750 Monroe Avenue
ž Pittsford, NY 14534
ž Tel: 585.381.6000
ž Fax: 585.383.6800


 


 









 





Exhibit 10.2







Cash Bonus Pool




The Cash Bonus Pool will be determined based on the table below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	% OF	 
	 	 	OPERATING	 	 	POOL	 	 	OPERATING	 
	 	 	INCOME	 	 	AMOUNT	 	 	INCOME	 
	 
	<	$	250,000	 	 	 	0	 	 	 	0.0	%
	 
	 	$	250,000	 	 	$	30,000	 	 	 	12.0	%
	 
	 	$	500,000	 	 	$	60,000	 	 	 	12.0	%
	 
	 	$	750,000	 	 	$	100,000	 	 	 	13.3	%
	 
	 	$	1,000,000	 	 	$	140,000	 	 	 	14.0	%
	 
	 	$	1,250,000	 	 	$	180,000	 	 	 	14.4	%
	 
	 	$	1,500,000	 	 	$	230,000	 	 	 	15.3	%
	 
	 	$	1,750,000	 	 	$	280,000	 	 	 	16.0	%






Veramark Technologies, Inc.
ž www.veramark.com

 Corporate: 3750 Monroe Avenue
ž Pittsford, NY 14534
ž Tel: 585.381.6000
ž Fax: 585.383.6800
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6646]



[[Page 13446]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biomedical Library and Informatics Review 
Committee.
    Date: June 11-12, 2009.
    Time: June 11, 2009, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, Board Room, 
2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Time: June 12, 2009, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, Board Room, 
2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Arthur A Petrosian, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of 
Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 
301-496-4253, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc8c99888e938f959dbc919d9590d2929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ef9f8a9b9d809c868eaf828e8683c1818687c1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-6646 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Terra Tech Corp

Irvine, California

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Supplemental Prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement (No. 333-210673), of our reports dated March 31, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Terra Tech Corp’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption “Experts” in the Supplemental Prospectus.

 

 

/s/ Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP

 

Sacramento, California

June 26, 2017
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                registrant. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 1, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Ronald C. Schmeiser              |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Ronald                C. Schmeiser                  |
|                                |   | President,                Chief Executive           |
|                                |   | Officer,                and Chief Financial Officer |

----
----

|   | (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended May 31, 2009      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                         |

| Dated:      June 30,      2009 | By:    | /s/      Anthony Zaradic                              |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | Anthony      Zaradic                                  |   |
|                           |   | President,      Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Executive |   |
|                           |   | Officer      and Chief Financial Officer              |   |

----
Bryant HARDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106995

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: July 16, 2019

FOR APPELLANT, Gwenda Renee Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

For Respondent, ERIC S. SCHMITT, Daniel N. McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Bryant Hardy ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030 RSMo.; one count of incest, in violation of Section 568.020 RSMo.; and four counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of *420Section 566.062 RSMo. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to two consecutive life terms, one concurrent seven-year term, and three concurrent life terms of imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. This Court affirmed those convictions on appeal in *State v. Hardy,*496 S.W.3d 643 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 256 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 256

 Observing the 29th anniversary of the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi 
                               in Rwanda.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2023

Mr. Kelly of Mississippi submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Observing the 29th anniversary of the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi 
                               in Rwanda.

Whereas the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda has been internationally 
        recognized as the massacre of nearly 1,000,000 Tutsi within a four-month 
        period by the nation's Hutu-led Government and Hutu neighbors as part of 
        a systematic program of genocide;
Whereas moderate Hutu who were opposed to the Hutu-led Government's genocidal 
        plan were also murdered during this time;
Whereas this atrocity constituted a grave violation of human rights and the rule 
        of law, causing untold pain and suffering;
Whereas the genocide against the Tutsi has left a solemn reminder that the 
        United States and countries around the world must work together to 
        protect the vulnerable, uphold human rights, and prevent genocide;
Whereas on April 7 of each year since 1994 the world has commemorated the 
        genocide against the Tutsi to honor the memory of the men, women, and 
        children who died and to express solidarity with the survivors; and
Whereas this commemoration not only remembers the victims of the genocide 
        against the Tutsi in Rwanda but also helps to build bridges of 
        understanding between different people and fortify the commitment to 
        human rights, protection against persecution and violence, individual 
        liberty, and a free society for all people: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) observes the 29th anniversary of the 1994 genocide 
        against the Tutsi in Rwanda and remembers the victims and 
        survivors of this tragedy;
            (2) recognizes the ongoing efforts of the people and 
        Government of Rwanda to promote peace, reconciliation, and 
        development, and pledges to continue its support for these 
        efforts; and
            (3) reaffirms its commitment to preventing genocide and 
        other mass atrocities, and to promoting human rights and 
        democratic values around the world.
                                 <all>
```
BEFORE THE

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the matter of:

Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

on Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain 

Maintenance Provider Employees Located 

Outside of the United States

Request by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) for a 120-day extension of 

the comment period

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) supports the request of Airlines for America 

(A4A) for an additional 120 days to respond to the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(ANPRM) concerning Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees 

Located Outside of the United States published on March 17, 2014. IATA and its 230 member 

airlines have a significant interest in the outcome of this rulemaking process.

IATA commends DOT’s efforts to gather information on foreign local laws for the application of 

drug and alcohol testing at repair stations. An additional 120 days will enable IATA and other 

industry stakeholders to best assist the Department’s request for input from other governments 

as well as from private stakeholders.

Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

Douglas E. Lavin

Regional Vice President, North America

International Air Transport Association

1201 F St., NW

Suite 650

Washington, D.C. 20004

Tel: 202-628-9292

Fax: 202-628-9448

lavind@iata.org

Docket No.:

FAA-2012-1058
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6089]



[[Page 11751]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-09-009]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date:  March 26, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1145 (Final) (Certain Steel Threaded Rod From 
China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on or before April 6, 2009.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 17, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
 [FR Doc. E9-6089 Filed 3-17-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Techwell, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Fumihiro Kozato, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

|   |   | /s/ Fumihiro  Kozato                   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Fumihiro Kozato                        |
|   |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | May 8, 2008                       |

 

----
---

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS In connection with the Annual Report of Nexaira Wireless Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ralph Proceviat, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report. By:
        /s/ RALPH PROCEVIAT
  Ralph Proceviat 
    Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Date:
        January 28, 2011


---
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*Horner.

Submitted June 13, 1902.

Decided December 20, 1902.

1. *Druggist*— License.

In. prosecutions for carrying on tile business of druggist without a state license, on the plea of not guilty, the burden of justifying under or proving license is on tbe defendant, (p. 374).

*374Error to Circuit Court, Doddridge County.

Action by the State against W. J. Horner. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.

*Affirmed.*

J. Y. BlaiR and W. S. Stewart, for plaintiff in error.

■ ATTORNEY GENERAL, for the State.

DENT, PRESIDENT :

In the case of the State against W. J. Horner from the circuit court of Doddridge County, being a prosecution for unlawfully carrying on the business of a druggist without a State license therefor, the only question presented is as to whether the burden of proving the want of license devolved upon the State or the defendant.

The State showed that the defendant was carrying on the business of a druggist as charged in the indictment and then rested. The defendant offering no evidence, the court instructed the jury to find a verdict of guilty. To this the defendant excepts, and insists that the court should presume that he had a license unless the contrary is shown.

While there is some authority to sustain this contention, the decided weight is to the contrary and to the effect that the State has the right to require a person carrying on a business which the statute makes unlawful without license, to establish such license as a matter peculiarly within his knowledge and convenience, subjecting him to no hardship, but promoting the restrictions of the law and thereby furthering the ends of justice. Negative averments peculiarly within the knowledge of the .opposite party are usually taken to be true, if such party remains silent, on the theory that silence is presumptive evidence of assent, and amounts to a legal admission or confession as to such averments.

.In the 17th Am. & En. En. Law (3 Ed.) 330, many authorities on this question are collected. Also see the 13 En. Plead & Prac. 119.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Packaging Dynamics
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Frank V. Tannura, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Patrick T. Chambliss, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ FRANK V. TANNURA
--------------------------------
Name:  Frank v. Tannura
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 8, 2005

/s/ PATRICK T. CHAMBLISS
--------------------------------
Name:  Patrick t. Chambliss
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  August 8, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Packaging Dynamics CorporatioN and will be retained by Packaging
Dynamics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

                                       29