alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.3







|TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580 | FAX (713) 651-0849
|--------------------------------------- | ------------------
|1100 LOUISIANA                          | SUITE 4600        



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



Ryder Scott Company,
L.P. (“Ryder Scott”) consents to the references to our firm and our report dated February 28, 2014 (our “Report”)
included in Ecopetrol S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the ”Annual Report”),
the inclusion of our Report as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report and references to and information derived from our Report in the
Annual Report, as well as to the incorporation by reference of this consent and our Report into Ecopetrol’s S.A.’s
registration statement on Form F-3 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on or about July 26, 2013 (the
“Registration Statement”). Ryder Scott further consents to the references to Ryder Scott as set forth in the Registration
Statement under the heading “Experts”.



| | /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.    
| | ---------------------------------
| |                                  
| | RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.        
| | TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580



Houston, Texas

April 21, 2014



SUITE 600, 1015 4TH STREET, S.W.     CALGARY,
ALBERTA T2R 1J4     TEL (403) 262-2799     FAX (403) 262-2790

621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550     DENVER,
COLORADO 80293-1501     TEL (303) 623-9147     FAX (303) 623-4258
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Goldcorp Holdings Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:



1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Pierre Quilliam



Pierre Quilliam,

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Date:  March 25, 2010
Exhibit 12.1(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of KB Financial Group Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Chung Won KangChung Won KangVice Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Ruben Cazares,

 Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-15-00266-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140D00210)

ORDER

The Court, on its own motion, vacates the April 13, 2017 submission and oral argument 

setting. 

It is further ORDERED that the above styled and numbered cause is hereby rescheduled 

for Thursday, June 8, 2017, at 1:00 p.m. in the Courtroom of the Eighth Court of Appeals, 500 E. 

San Antonio, Suite 1203, El Paso, Texas.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of April, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Palafox, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, K. Marc LeVier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ K. Marc LeVier


K. Marc LeVier, Chief Executive Officer


November 22, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 20 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk September 2 0 , 2019

1 60239 ( 86 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 1 60239

v COA: 3 39441

Saginaw CC: 16

- 042711

- FC

JUSTIN LLOYD HUGHES

, Defendant

- Appell ant

.

________ ______________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to file a pro per

supplement to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED

. The supplement submitted

on September 1 7 , 2019 , is accepted for filing

.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Allen R. Hartman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hartman Short Term Income Properties XX, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 ("the Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  June 7, 2013  /s/ Allen R. HartmanAllen R. HartmanChairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Xtrasafe, Inc. a Florida corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Baker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Xtrasafe, Inc., and will be retained by Xtrasafe, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Daniel Baker
----------------
Daniel Baker
Chief Financial Officer
December 31, 2009
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy
Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                                                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Gary L. Carano,                                                                           
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Chief Executive Officer ofCircus and Eldorado Joint Ventureand Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
Pierre T. PIPES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106328

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: December 26, 2018

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Julia E. Neidhardt, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Pierre Pipes appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *403setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Molly GUNTER (now Brock), Respondent, v. Craig T. GUNTER, Appellant.

WD 81574

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: May 14, 2019

Kenneth C. Hensley, Raymore for appellant.

Carmen J. Carter, Raymore for respondent.

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

In January 2013, the Circuit Court of Cass County dissolved the marriage of Craig Gunter and Molly Gunter (now Brock). The parties were granted joint legal and joint physical custody of their two children, and Gunter was ordered to pay child support to Brock. Gunter filed a Motion to Modify, seeking to reduce his child support obligation. The circuit court denied the motion. Gunter appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Deborah Kay HUBER, Appellant.

WD 81778

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 30, 2019

Nicholas Dudley, Blue Springs, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Kent Gipson, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Appellant.

Evan Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Special Division: Zel Fischer, Supreme Court Justice Presiding, Gary D. Witt, and Thomas N. Chapman, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Deborah Huber appeals the judgment convicting her of the class B felony of driving while intoxicated, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri. In her sole point on appeal, Huber asserts that the evidence was not sufficient to show that drugs she had ingested caused her to operate a motor vehicle while impaired. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,239]


Three Rivers Timber, Inc., Kamiah, ID; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 12, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Three Rivers Timber, Inc., Kamiah, Idaho.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6299 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 32.1****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**     Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of North PointeHoldings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:November 13, 2007     /s/ James G. Petcoff     James G. Petcoff
Marie-Helen CORMIER, Appellant, v. The CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, et al., Respondents.

WD 80980

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: May 29, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 3, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018

George S. Smith, for Appellant.

Shelly Kintzel, for Respondents.

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Marie-Helen Cormier appeals the judgment of the Boone County Circuit Court granting summary judgment against her and dismissing her cause of action with prejudice. She argues in four points on appeal that the trial court erred because it misapplied law, overlooked her evidence, and misread her petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
In the INTEREST OF J.C.F., Appellant,

No. ED 106774

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: June 4, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Craig A. Johnston, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

For Respondent: CarolynWhitehorn, 920 N. Vandeventer, St. Louis, MO 63108-3530.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

J.C.F ("Appellant") appeals the denial of his motion to suppress Franscisc Buda's ("Victim") pre-trial and in-court identification of Appellant, and the order requiring him to pay restitution to victim. The Juvenile Commissioner of the Family Court for the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis found the evidence sustained the allegation that Appellant committed what would have been, if he were an adult, unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030 RSMo., and ordered Appellant be committed to the Division of Youth Services until he attains the age of 18, and that he pay restitution of $ 750.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*806The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Domionte S. CHEATUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81101

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: June 25, 2019

Amanda Langenheim, Kansas City for appellant.

Richard Starnes, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Boone County, Domionte Cheatum was convicted of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and armed criminal action. The charges arose from an aborted drug deal and shooting which occurred in Columbia in June 2013. After we affirmed his convictions on direct appeal, Cheatum filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The circuit court denied Cheatum's motion following an evidentiary hearing. Cheatum appeals. He argues that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to adequately litigate a claim that the State had violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Winnie Wong, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avrupa Minerals Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.







Date:   May 7, 2015







/s/  Winnie Wong

Winnie Wong

Chief Financial Officer