alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT NO. 32

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Pepper Rock Resources Corp. (the
"Company"),  on Form  10-K/A for the year ended July 31,  2010 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  the  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer,  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Sec.  1350 as adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

     (1)  the  Report  of the  Company  filed  today  fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: December 13, 2010   BY: /s/ Phil Kueber
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Phil Kueber, President, Chief Executive Officer,
                              Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer,
                              Principal Accounting Officer, and sole member of
                              the Board of Directors.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,109] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 4, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by the Rapid Response Coordinator for the State of Arkansas on behalf of workers of Fortis Plastics, LLC, Fort Smith, Arkansas. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March, 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6294 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit
      32.2








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      James A. Krantz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      of Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my
      knowledge and belief that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
      with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Platinum Underwriters Holdings,
      Ltd.








Date:
                July 26, 2007
            /s/  JAMES
                A. KRANTZBy:
                James A. KrantzExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer
Presentation to the 

Advisory Committee for Aviation 

Consumer Protection

Presenter: Andrew Weinstein

Executive Director

Open Allies for Airfare Transparency

December 16, 2013

1
About Open Allies

400+ Member Companies and Organizations 

Representing Tens of Millions of Travelers

2
Principles for Future of Air 

Travel Distribution

• Transparency

• Choice

• Competition

• Innovation

• Privacy

3
Privacy Principle

“Travelers should be able to shop 

anonymously in a setting in which all 

applicable privacy laws and regulations are 

respected. Customization should be at the 

request of the traveler, not at the demand 

of the supplier, and travel suppliers should 

allow travelers to decide which additional 

services they would like to receive, if any, 

whether traveling on business or for leisure 

with their family.”

4
Personalization vs. Customization

Personalization = You tell me what 

you think I want

Customization = I tell you what I 

actually want

5
Customized Home Shopping

6
Personalized Home Shopping

• No listed prices 

• No central databases of available homes

• Each real estate company only shows its 

own properties

• Size and neighborhood predicted based 

on recent visits to other homes

• Price "personalized" for each potential 

buyer, depending on how much you paid 

for your last house 

7
Hansel and Gretel Cartoon

8
A Consumer-Focused Framework 

for Personalization

• Transparent - Ancillaries should fully disclosed and 

transparent through all channels

• Consumer-driven – Customization should respond to 

travelers’ requests, not airline predictions

• Anonymous - Consumers should get broad range of 

customizable offers without providing personal 

information and have privacy rights protected

• Competitive - Consumers should be able to compare 

equivalent fares and ancillary fees across airlines on 

multiple websites, not limited to apples-to-horses 

comparisons on different airline sites.

9
Thank you!

10
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Leslye Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

                           /s/ Leslye Grindle
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Leslye Grindle, Vice President and
                           Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2002

                                      19
Exhibit 32(b)

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC

Certificate Pursuant to
Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CFO

The undersigned, Paul M. Keglevic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 17th day
of February, 2011.



/s/ PAUL M. KEGLEVICName:

Paul M. KeglevicTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC and will be retained by Energy Future Intermediate Holding
Company LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GAIN Capital Holdings, Inc.; |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                      |
|----------------------|
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Date: April 30, 2015 |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Glenn H. Stevens |
|                 |   |   |   |   |   | Glenn H. Stevens |
|                 |   |   |   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
----

----

| 1.  | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 31, 2011                                                                                                                          |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                               |
| /s/ Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                                             |
| Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                                                 |
| Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON GP 14, LLC General Partner of ICON Equipment and Corporate Infrastructure Fund Fourteen, L.P. |
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries



|                                           |  |                              
|------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Entity Name                                |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|GCAM, LLC                                  |  | Delaware                     
|GAIN Holdings, LLC                         |  | Delaware                     
|GAIN Capital Group, LLC                    |  | Delaware                     
|S.L. Bruce Financial Corporation           |  | Ohio                         
|GAIN Capital Securities, Inc.              |  | Delaware                     
|JiaShen Forex Technology, LLC              |  | China                        
|GAIN Capital Holdings International, LLC   |  | Delaware                     
|GAIN Global Markets, Inc.                  |  | Cayman Islands               
|Island Traders (Cayman), Limited           |  | Cayman Islands               
|GAIN Capital-Forex.com Hong Kong, Ltd.     |  | Hong Kong                    
|Forex.com Japan Co., Ltd.                  |  | Japan                        
|GAIN Capital Forex.com Australia Pty. Ltd. |  | Australia                    
|GAIN Capital-Forex.com Singapore, Ltd.     |  | Singapore                    
|GAIN Capital-Forex.com U.K., Ltd.          |  | England and Wales            
|GAIN GTX, LLC                              |  | Delaware                     
|GAIN Capital Service Company, LLC          |  | Delaware
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5590 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide individuals relief 

from the alternative minimum tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2006 

Mr. REYNOLDS (for himself, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. HAYWORTH, 

Mr. WELLER, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. LINDER, Mr. 

SWEENEY, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mrs. JO ANN

DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. SCHWARZ of Michigan, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. TIBERI, 

Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. MCHUGH, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. GILLMOR, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. CONAWAY, 

Mr. KINGSTON, Mrs. MYRICK, Mrs. BONO, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. 

SIMMONS, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. WICKER, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. KLINE, 

Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. MURPHY, and Mrs. BIGGERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

individuals relief from the alternative minimum tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stealth Tax Relief Ex5 tension Act of 2006’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5590 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX EXEMP2 TION AMOUNT FOR 2007. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 55(d)(1) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption amount for 

5 taxpayers other than corporations) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘$62,550 in the case of taxable 

7 years beginning in 2006’’ in subparagraph (A) and 

8 inserting ‘‘$66,100 in the case of taxable years be9 ginning in 2007’’, and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘$42,500 in the case of taxable 

11 years beginning in 2006’’ in subparagraph (B) and 

12 inserting ‘‘$44,900 in the case of taxable years be13 ginning in 2007’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 December 31, 2006. 

17 SEC. 3. ALLOWANCE OF NONREFUNDABLE PERSONAL 

18 CREDITS AGAINST REGULAR AND ALTER19 NATIVE MINIMUM TAX LIABILITY. 

20 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 26(a) of 

21 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

22 (1) by striking ‘‘2006’’ in the heading thereof 

23 and inserting ‘‘2007’’, and 

24 (2) by striking ‘‘or 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2006, 

25 or 2007’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5590 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2006. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
| 1.   | The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Chance High International Limited, a British Virgin Islands company (“Chance High”); |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Chance High’s wholly owned subsidiary, Yantai Shencaojishi Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., a PRC company (“WFOE”); |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Chance High’s wholly owned subsidiary, Yantai Nirui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a PRC company (“WFOE II”); |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | the WFOE’s variable interest entity, Yantai Bohai Pharmaceuticals Group Co., Ltd., a PRC company (“Bohai”), which is the Company’s  initial operating subsidiary; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | WFOE II’s wholly owned subsidiary, Yantai Tianzheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a PRC company (“Yantai Tianzheng”), which the Company acquired in August 2011 and is the Company’s second operating subsidiary. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Order filed January 23, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01026

- CV

____________ KHALED ALATTAR , Appellant

V.

MESIA HUTTNER HACHAD ORIAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 54501



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due January 13, 2014

. No brief or motion for
extension of time has been filed.
Unless appellant submits a brief to the clerk of this court on or before February 24, 2014 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Polanco, Also Known as Jose Mendoza, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 830]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered May 20, 1998, as amended June 3, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree (two counts), criminal contempt in the second degree (two counts), and bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 years, 5 years, 1 year, 1 year, and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant made only a general motion for a trial order of dismissal, and since the colloquy at the pre-charge conference did not relate to the issue of legal sufficiency, defendant’s challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence of criminal intent regarding the two burglary incidents are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. In the first incident, *308even assuming that the only crime intended was criminal contempt, the evidence established that defendant entered with intent to commit that crime by violating an order of protection. Although, at the time of his forcible entry, defendant was already in violation of the order, he clearly intended to violate it further, and more seriously than before. In the second incident, the circumstantial evidence established that defendant forcibly entered and ransacked the then-unoccupied apartment, and the jury could have reasonably concluded that defendant’s criminal intent was contemporaneous with his unlawful entry.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s response to a jury note is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court responded meaningfully to the note. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
### NUMBER 13

- 12

- 00 030

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN RE ALAMEX, NV

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez

, Benavides , and Perkes

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 1

Relator, Alamex, NV

, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for

emergency stay in th e above cause on January 19, 2012.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of

mandamus and t he motion for emergency stay, is of the opinion that relator ha s not

shown itself entitled to the relief sough t

. Accordingly, t he p etition for writ of

1 See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but

is not required to do so.”); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opi nions and memorandum opinions).2

mandamus and motion for emergency stay are DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 20th

day of January, 2012

.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 22

- 00576

- CV

George NAVARRO

, Appellant

v.

Rebecca HERNANDEZ and Kristan Hernandez,

Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI07366

Honorable Monique Diaz , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 19, 2022

APPEAL DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

The clerk’s record wa s due on November 14, 2022. On September 19, 2022, the trial cour t

clerk filed a Notification of Late Record stating appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements

to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying

the fee. On September 20, 2022, this court ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court

no later than September 30, 2022 that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have

been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s

fee. O ur order cautioned appellant that if he fail ed to respond within the time provided, this appeal04

- 22

- 00576

- CV

- 2

- w ould be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b). Appellant did not

respond; therefore, this appeal is dismiss ed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
Copy of the Third Amendment of the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit (10)i(7) 
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 OF THE 
 STEPAN COMPANY 2006 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Stepan Company (the “Company”) has established and maintains the Stepan Company 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section 5.8 by action of the Board of Directors; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to change the time a Non-Employee Director is required to serve as a Non-Employee
Director after the date of a grant; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that effective October 19, 2009, the Plan is
amended as follows: 
 1. By deleting Section 4.3 of the Plan in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

 “4.3 Service Required for Exercise. Each Stock Option granted to a Participant under this Section 4 shall become
exercisable upon the Participant’s completion of two continuous years of service as a Non-Employee Director after the date of the grant thereof or, in respect of a stock option granted on or after April 22, 2008, if earlier, the date of the
second annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders held after the date of the grant thereof, provided the Participant has been in continuous service as a Non-Employee Director from the date of the grant to the date of such annual
meeting.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officer of the Company has executed this Third Amendment of the
Plan on behalf of the Company and has caused its corporate seal to be affixed this 19th day of October, 2009. 
  

			
	STEPAN COMPANY
		
	By	 	/s/ Greg Servatius
	Its	 	VPHR


  

			
	ATTEST:
		
	By	 	/s/ Sheila M. Crockett
	Its	 	Total Rewards Supervisor

  

 7