alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the
period ended September 30, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 and;2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 Date: October 30, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Juan J. RománJuan J. RománVice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00212-CV 

IN RE BOBBY DEON DAVIS AND 

YORK LANDSCAPING, LLC

RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 153-250823-11

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 17, 2014

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
June 2 5 , 2015

Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2015

- 0111 Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mailcode: 2822T 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

To the members of the EPA working on the Renewable Fuels Standard, thank you for your tim e. M y name is Kim Bertz, and I live in rural Lafayette County, Missouri. I am a farm

- wife, a mother of 3 daughters dedicated to the agricultural industry, and I have worked for Novozymes for the past 8 years. I appreci ate the work you do

-- a responsibility for research, analysis, foresight to do what is right for our nation and its future generations

.

A healthy America is strong, sustainable, and independently able to nurture and defend
itself

. America , and the EPA, has the opportunity to create even greater strength

– for its people, its purpose, its pride and generations to come. That opportunity is the RFS

.

Fuel is the li feblood of this widespread, resource

- rich nation, enabling development and production of goods, services, people and industry to move through out and across its borders

. However, as America grows we need to increase our own inner strength and sustainability
, becoming less dependent on foreign count ries

. I fully support a strong federal RFS because increasing domestic renewable fuel leads to greater national security , more American jobs, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and lower gas prices. The RFS is that strong foundation, our inner strength, enabling home

- grown sustainable fuels that give s our nation the ability to thrive.

Living on a Western Missouri production agriculture corn and soybean farm, I see a nd feel the widespread benefits of the RFS

... not only do our crops produce American fuel
, and livestock
to feed American families
, but I personally work in the BioEnergy sector. I see and feel every day the incredible impact that the RFS has from city to farm, national, state and rural community development. I don’t know of any p rogram or idea put into place that has a greater opportunity
to affect more Americans and strengthen our country than the RFS.The developers of the RFS were brilliant

. The EPA , however, has submitted a proposal that would severely weaken America, and directly contradicts the EPA’s other efforts

- such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions

. That proposal could increase greenhouse gas emissions equal to putting 2.1 million more cars back on the road. Renewable biofuels are the cleanest
and most sustainabl e liquid fuel in the world and is the last industry you should ever pull
back from

. In the final rule, the EPA should require obligated party compliance with the laws by blending increasing volumes of renewable fuels. Please

-- support American jobs, a cleaner environment and greater national security. Please support a stable RFS. The RFS works
for America.

Sincerely,



## Kim M. Bertz

Kim M. Bertz 12113 Prairie Valley Road Mayview, MO 64071
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Penny Kelly, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 906]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered December 3, 1999, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of attempted sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3V2 to 7 years. Defendant now argues that the sentence was harsh and excessive, especially given her drug and alcohol addiction and her expression of remorse. In light of defendant’s criminal history and the fact that the sentence was in accordance with the plea agreement, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed *(see, People v Oliver,*251 AD2d 749; *People v Williams,*238 AD2d 633, *lv denied*90 NY2d 866).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Walter
      Reid Green, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Walter Reid Green, Jr.


Walter
      Reid Green, Jr.


Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:
      November 13, 2006








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 51 (Friday, March 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06171]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, March 20, 2013, 9:50 a.m. Eastern Time.

PLACE: Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office 
Building, 131 ``M'' Street NE., Washington, DC 20507.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. Input into the Development of a Quality Control Plan for Private 
Sector Investigations and Conciliations.

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. Seating is limited and it is suggested that visitors arrive 
30 minutes before the meeting in order to be processed through 
security and escorted to the meeting room. (In addition to 
publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the Federal 
Register, the Commission also provides information about Commission 
meetings on its Web site, eeoc.gov., and provides a recorded 
announcement a week in advance on future Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation and Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART) services at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. 
Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the 
voice and TTY numbers listed above.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Bernadette B. Wilson, Acting 
Executive Officer on (202) 663-4077.
    This Notice Issued March 13, 2013.

    Dated: March 13, 2013.
 Bernadette B. Wilson,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2013-06171 Filed 3-13-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
Michael FRENCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105465

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

FILED: March 20, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 23, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied July 3, 2018

Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 100, Saint Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Michael French ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises three points on appeal, arguing the motion court erred in denying his motion in violation of his constitutional rights to effective assistance of counsel and due process because: (1) Movant was abandoned by the private counsel who represented him on appeal ("Appellate Counsel"), drafted his initial motion for post-conviction relief, and filed it with the motion court because Appellate Counsel neither entered an appearance to *368represent Movant in the post-conviction proceedings nor filed an amended motion; (2) Movant did not receive conflict-free representation during the post-conviction proceedings in that no attorney ever entered an appearance on Movant's behalf, and Appellate Counsel who drafted Movant's initial motion was conflicted because he represented Movant during his direct appeal; and (3) the motion court denied Movant's initial motion for post-conviction relief before the time for filing an amended motion expired because no attorney ever entered an appearance to represent Movant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 504 

Recognizing and honoring the 51 mobility Airmen from Joint Base Charleston 

who received the Distinguished Service Cross. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2023 

Ms. MACE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring the 51 mobility Airmen from Joint 

Base Charleston who received the Distinguished Service 

Cross. 

Whereas 51 mobility Airmen from Joint Base Charleston 

served in Operation Allies Refuge, the evacuation of Afghanistan; and 

Whereas the Airmen’s heroic efforts during that Operation 

resulted in the award of the Distinguished Service Cross: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and honors the 51 mobility Airmen from Joint Base 

3 Charleston who received the Distinguished Service Cross 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 504 IH 

1 for heroic efforts during the Afghanistan evacuation Oper2 ation Allies Refuge. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

 CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Charles A.
Fust, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Russell R. Lee III, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Charles A. Fust
------------------------------
Charles A. Fust
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004


/s/ Russell R. Lee III
------------------------------
Russell R. Lee III
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2004
**Exhibit 31.1**
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
I, Peter A. Edison, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers FootwearGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
   (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;    (b)[reserved]    (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and    (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
   (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and    (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.       August 16, 2004 /s/  Peter A. Edison      Peter A. Edison     Chairman of the Board and     Chief Executive Officer     Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.     (Principal Executive Officer)
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: (^fC^'lVb l ^ ' ' W/ ( \ l \/\['^J^ i 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E.0.12866: The recrements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review; The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

Name / , 

Title/Office ( '
Offer Letter with Paul Hammond



 Exhibit 10.10 
 Mr. P Hammond 
 20 Aldenholme 
 Ellesmere Road

 Weybridge 
 Surrey 
 KT13 OJF 
 8th November 2004 
 Dear Paul, 
 Offer of Employment 
 We are delighted to make you a full offer of
employment (subject to references) with GlassHouse Technologies (UK) Ltd. 
  

			
	Position:	  	Technology Services Group Director (UK)
		
	Reporting to:	  	Jason Rabbetts, UK Managing Director
		
	Employment office:	  	 St George’s House
 31-33 Monument Hill

Weybridge
 Surrey
 KT13 8RN

		
	Basic Salary:	  	£96,000
		
	On Target Earnings:	  	£185,000
		
		  	Please see enclosed remuneration framework for more commission and earnings details.
		
	Working Hours:	  	9.00am – 5.30pm
		
	Other benefits:	  	 22 days holiday entitlement
 Company share option
scheme
 Flexible benefits scheme









 We sincerely hope you find our offer acceptable and would suggest
a start date of Monday 6th December at 10.00am. 
 Please confirm in writing if you would like to accept the position under the terms and conditions detailed above (please note, this offer is only valid for thirty days), and return to us the enclosed medical questionnaire, and details of
two references we can take. 
  

	
	Yours sincerely
	
	 /s/ Jason Rabbetts

	Jason Rabbetts
	
	UK Managing Director
FILED

August 21, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

JULY 1998 SESSION

DERRICK K. GARRIN, ) NO. 02C01-9707-CR-00272

)

Appellant, ) SHELBY COUNTY No. P-17200

)

VS. ) HON. JOSEPH B. DAILEY,

) JUDGE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) AFFIRMED - RULE 20

Appellee. )

ORDER

This is a post-conviction matter. The petitioner was originally convicted by

a jury of two (2) counts of felony murder and two (2) counts of attempted second

degree murder. He received an effective sentence of life imprisonment plus

twenty-one (21) years. This court subsequently affirmed those convictions. 

State v. Derrick K. Garrin, C.C.A. No. 02C01-9501-CR-00028, Shelby County

(Tenn. Crim. App. filed May 24, 1996, at Jackson).

The petitioner complains that he was deprived of effective assistance of

counsel at both the trial and appellate levels. The petitioner alleges counsel was

deficient for: (1) failing to effectively cross-examine a state’s witness, (2) failing to

call certain witnesses, and (3) failing to present mitigating evidence at his

sentencing hearing. Further, petitioner complains appellate counsel failed to

properly challenge the “moral certainty” jury charge, and the post-conviction court

committed plain error when it refused to provide him with a portion of the trial

transcript during the post-conviction hearing in order to contest a “dynamite” jury

charge.

With regard to the ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we find the

petitioner fails to present even a colorable claim of deficient representation. The

trial court found the petitioner received “outstanding representation.” The

evidence does not preponderate otherwise.
2

Any alleged error regarding the “moral certainty” jury charge was waived

by the failure to present it on direct appeal. Furthermore, the “moral certainty”

jury charge was proper. See Carter v. State, 958 S.W.2d 620, 626 (Tenn. 1997).

Likewise, any alleged error regarding a “dynamite” jury charge was waived

by the failure to present it on direct appeal. Further, this allegation is not set

forth in the petition or amended petition; thus, the post-conviction court properly

refused to consider it. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-210(c).

After thoroughly reviewing the record, the briefs, and the law governing

the issues presented by the petitioner, we conclude the evidence does not

preponderate against the findings of the trial court that the petitioner received

effective assistance of counsel. Further, no error of law requiring a reversal of

judgment is apparent. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court

of Criminal Appeals, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Costs are taxed to

the state as the appellant is indigent.

All of which is so ordered.

_________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

_________________________

CURWOOD WITT, JUDGE

_________________________

ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER,

 SPECIAL JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 302 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 302

 Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of 
  these brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing 
 support for the designation of April 18, 2023, as ``National Lineman 
                          Appreciation Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2023

 Mr. Rouzer submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of 
  these brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing 
 support for the designation of April 18, 2023, as ``National Lineman 
                          Appreciation Day''.

Whereas the profession of linemen is steeped in personal, family, and 
        professional tradition;
Whereas linemen are often first responders during storms and other catastrophic 
        events, working to make the scene safe for other public safety heroes;
Whereas linemen must work high atop powerlines 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, 
        to keep electricity flowing;
Whereas linemen play a vital role in the Nation's economy by maintaining and 
        growing the energy infrastructure of the United States;
Whereas linemen must often work under dangerous conditions separated from their 
        families to keep schools and businesses open;
Whereas linemen deserve recognition from the community regarding the danger of 
        their work; and
Whereas, April 18, 2023, would be an appropriate date to designate as ``National 
        Lineman Appreciation Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the efforts of linemen in keeping the power 
        on and protecting public safety;
            (2) supports the designation of ``National Lineman 
        Appreciation Day''; and
            (3) recognizes linemen as first responders.
                                 <all>
```