alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 468 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 468

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 12) to protect a person's 
  ability to determine whether to continue or end a pregnancy, and to 
 protect a health care provider's ability to provide abortion services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2023

 Ms. DeGette submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 12) to protect a person's 
  ability to determine whether to continue or end a pregnancy, and to 
 protect a health care provider's ability to provide abortion services.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the 
House shall proceed to the consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. 
12) to protect a person's ability to determine whether to continue or 
end a pregnancy, and to protect a health care provider's ability to 
provide abortion services. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 
of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Energy and Commerce or 
their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of H.R. 12.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2010 of Private Secretary, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Maureen Frances Cotton, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: December 27, 2010











/s/ Maureen Frances Cotton


Maureen Frances Cotton


President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer and Director
Amy L. ATKINSON, Respondent, v. CITY MUSEUM I, LLC, Appellant.

No. ED 106797

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.

Filed: June 18, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Charles Z. Vaughn, Brent L. Salsbury, Wiedner & McAuliffe, LTC, 8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 550, St. Louis, Missouri 63105.

FOR RESPONDENT: Amy C. Gunn, Elizabeth Lenivy, The Simon Law Firm, P.C., 800 Market Street, Suite 1700, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Philip M. Hess, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

*178Appellant City Museum I, LLC ("City Museum") appeals from a judgment entered upon jury verdict in favor of Respondent Amy Atkinson ("Atkinson") for personal injuries. Atkinson injured her knee while descending a playground slide designed, owned, and operated by City Museum. Atkinson alleged the unique hybrid wave- and tube-slide on City Museum's premises, intended to launch invitees into the air in an enclosed space without sufficient clearance for their feet, was known to be dangerous. While airborne, invitees faced catastrophic injury if their feet snagged upon the tube wall while momentum continued to carry them down the slide.

City Museum raises five points on appeal. In Point I, City Museum argues the trial court erred in submitting the case to a jury because lay jurors required expert assistance to identify the dangerous nature of the slide. For Point II, the City Museum claims it was error to submit the case to the jury when the danger the slide posed was open and obvious as a matter of law. For Points III and IV, City Museum argues the trial court erred in submitting defective jury instructions, granting a "roving commission" to the jury by vaguely identifying the danger and failing to present substantive evidence of a negligent design, respectively. For Point V, City Museum argues the trial court erred in allowing subsequent injury reports to be admitted into evidence, characterizing them as inadmissible hearsay without any applicable exception.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error in record presented to us. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for use of the parties setting forth the reasons for the decision.

We affirm the trial court's judgment under Rule 84.16(b).1

1

All rule citations are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2018) unless otherwise indicated.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terry Wilson, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 885]

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wade, J.), rendered August 13, 1997, convicting him *541of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court imposed December 4, 1997, which modified the sentence imposed on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree from an indeterminate term of 7V2 to 15 years imprisonment to a determinate term of 7 years imprisonment.

Ordered that the judgment and the resentence are affirmed.

The court did not err in denying the defendant’s challenge of a prospective juror for cause. The record does not support a finding that the prospective juror possessed “a state of mind that [was] likely to preclude [her] from rendering an impartial verdict based upon evidence adduced at the trial” (CPL 270.20 [1] [b]), or that there was a substantial risk that she would be unable to discharge her responsibilities as a juror (see, *People v Johnson,*94 NY2d 600).

The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC PENSION INVESTORS '84 MARCH 31, 2000 FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          21,788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,735
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,871
<PP&E>                                       3,966,790
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,813,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,938,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,065
<BONDS>                                      1,381,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,405,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,938,214
<SALES>                                        148,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,278
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,607
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            118,607
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   118,607
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54


</TABLE>
# Diario Oficial C 163A/5 de

| | ISSN 1725-244X |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 163A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 48o año5 de julio de 2005 |

ISSN 1725-244X

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 163A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

48o año5 de julio de 2005

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informaciones |
| | Comisión |
| 2005/C 163A/1 | Anuncio de puesto vacante de Director de la Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo (Grado A*14) COM/2005/10001 | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

III   Informaciones

Comisión

2005/C 163A/1

Anuncio de puesto vacante de Director de la Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo (Grado A*14) COM/2005/10001

1

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

III Informaciones

Comisión

| 5.7.2005 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 163/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2005

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 163/1

---

Anuncio de puesto vacante de

DIRECTOR

de la Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo

(Grado A*14)

COM/2005/10001

(2005/C 163 A/01)

La Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo está tratando de nombrar a un Director.

Los solicitantes deberán ser nacionales de uno de los Estados miembros de la Unión Europea.

El Director será nombrado por el consejo de administración de la Agencia a partir de una lista de candidatos seleccionados y propuestos por la Comisión Europea. El salario y las condiciones de empleo serán los establecidos en el estatuto de los funcionarios de las Comunidades Europeas para los funcionarios de grado A*14. Tanto la Agencia como la Comisión aplican una política de igualdad de oportunidades.

En las siguientes direcciones de Internet se pueden descargar la descripción del puesto, los formularios de solicitud y las instrucciones para enviar las candidaturas:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_fr.htm

o

http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/news/2005/jul/bilbao_vacancy_en.html

El plazo de recepción de las candidaturas expira el 10 de agosto de 2005 (el matasellos de correos dará fe de la fecha de envío).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee NIA-S.                    

*Date:*                         February 1-2, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702,                         *kimberly.firth@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 26, 2017.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2017-28154 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
May 29, 2015 

Mr. Kevin Lipscomb 

Magnum Home Inspections, Inc 

P.O. Box 700906 

San Antonio, TX 78720 

Dear Mr. Lipscomb.: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 28, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1264), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of BonusAmerica, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I, Ernest  Cheung,
Chief  Financial  Officer of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Ernest Cheung
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Ernest Cheung, CFO

Dated:  8/23/04
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129063 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129063 COA: 252981 Wayne CC: 03-006842-01 CLINTON JOHN KUKICH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 17, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20557

Summary Calendar

__________________

EDWARD TYLER, JR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 94-CV-2700

- - - - - - - - - -

February 13, 1996

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edward Tyler, Jr., appeals from the affirmance of the

Commissioner's decision denying disability insurance benefits

under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Tyler argues that the Commissioner's

decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

that the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial

evidence. 
No. 95-20557

-2-

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

         CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-
                                   OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steves Rodriguez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SinoFresh HealthCare,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):


<PAGE>

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

November  13,  2003

/s/  Steves  Rodriguez
-----------------------
Steves Rodriguez
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   September 10, 2009
    /s/ Charles R. Daniel, IIICharles R. Daniel, IIIExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,

Controller, Treasurer, and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)