Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Office of Personnel Management 5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AL83
 AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
 ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
 SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed rule that would define the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas by county rather than by city and town boundaries. Defining the New England FWS wage areas by primarily considering county boundaries would provide greater consistency in how OPM defines FWS wage areas and would improve the ability to make direct data comparisons with Census Bureau data. The proposed rule would define the New Haven-Hartford wage area to include Hartford and New Haven Counties, CT, as the survey area and Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties, CT, as the area of application and the New London wage area to include New London County, CT, as the survey area and Windham County, CT, as the area of application.
 DATES: We must receive comments on or before April 23, 2009.
 ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Charles D. Grimes III, Deputy Associate Director for Performance and Pay Systems, Strategic Human Resources Policy Division, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200; e-mail 
                        *pay-performance-policy@opm.gov;*
                         or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; e-mail 
                        *pay-performance-policy@opm.gov*;  or FAX: (202) 606-4264.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is engaged in an ongoing project to review the geographic definitions of Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. OPM considers the following regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211 when defining FWS wage area boundaries: (i) Distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features; (ii) Commuting patterns; and (iii) Similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments. FWS wage areas in New England differ from the majority of FWS wage areas in that they are geographically defined according to the boundaries of cities and towns rather than by the boundaries of counties. Under its methodology for defining metropolitan areas, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) uses counties rather than cities and towns as the primary geographic entities for defining metropolitan areas in New England. OMB uses cities and towns in New England to define a secondary set of metropolitan areas. Because OMB considers its county-based metropolitan areas the primary set of metropolitan areas for New England, we propose to primarily apply the county-based metropolitan area definitions to FWS wage area boundaries. Defining the New England FWS wage areas by primarily considering county boundaries will provide greater consistency in how the OPM defines FWS wage areas and will improve the ability to make direct data comparisons with Census Bureau data. For example, some statistical programs, such as the Census Bureau's 
                    *County Business Patterns,*
                     provide data by counties. OPM recently completed reviews of the definitions of the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, wage areas and, based on analyses of the regulatory criteria for defining wage areas, is proposing the changes described below. New Haven-Hartford, CT This proposed rule would define the New Haven-Hartford, CT, appropriated fund FWS wage area by county rather than by city and town boundaries. The proposed rule would define the New Haven-Hartford wage area to include Hartford and New Haven Counties, CT, as the survey area and Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties, CT, as the area of application. The New Haven-Hartford survey area currently includes 1 town of Fairfield County, 15 towns of Hartford County, 2 towns of Middlesex County, and 11 towns of New Haven County. We propose that the New Haven-Hartford survey area be changed to include all of Hartford and New Haven Counties. The survey area would be conveniently located in the central part of the wage area and would closely reflect the prevailing rates paid by businesses in the wage area. Stratford town in Fairfield County and Cromwell and Middlefield towns in Middlesex County, currently part of the New Haven-Hartford survey area, would be redefined to the New Haven-Hartford area of application. Hartford, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties comprise the Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Old Saybrook town in Middlesex County is part of the current New London wage area. Somers and Somersville towns in Tolland County are part of the current Central and Western Massachusetts wage area. OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit splitting MSAs for the purpose of defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances (e.g.,  organizational relationships among closely located Federal activities). OPM proposes to redefine Old Saybrook town in Middlesex County and Somers and Somersville towns in Tolland County to the New Haven-Hartford area of application so that the entire Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT MSA is in one wage area. No FWS employees currently work in Middlesex or Tolland Counties. With these changes, the New Haven-Hartford area of application would include all of Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties. These changes would be effective for the full-scale wage survey in the New Haven-Hartford wage area scheduled to begin in April 2011. New London, CT This proposed rule would define the New London, CT, appropriated fund FWS wage area by county rather than by city and town boundaries. The proposed rule would define the New London wage area to include New London 
                    ( print page 12281)
                    County, CT, as the survey area and Windham County, CT, as the area of application. The New London survey area currently includes 28 towns of New London County, CT, 1 town of Middlesex County, CT, and 2 towns of Washington County, RI. We propose that the New London survey area be changed to include all of New London County. OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit splitting Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for the purpose of defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances (e.g., organizational relationships among closely located Federal activities). OPM proposes to redefine Old Saybrook town in Middlesex County, currently part of the New London survey area, to the New Haven-Hartford area of application so the entire Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT MSA is in one wage area. No FWS employees currently work in Middlesex County. OPM proposes to redefine Hopkinton and Westerly towns in Washington County, currently part of the New London survey area, to the Narragansett Bay, RI, area of application so the entire Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA MSA is in one wage area. No FWS employees currently work in Hopkinton and Westerly towns. These changes would be effective for the full-scale wage survey in the New London wage area scheduled to begin in September 2010. The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the national labor-management committee that advises OPM on FWS pay matters, reviewed and recommended these changes by consensus. Based on its review of the regulatory criteria for defining FWS wage areas, FPRAC recommended no other changes in the geographic definitions of the New Haven-Hartford and New London wage areas. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that these regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they would affect only Federal agencies and employees. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure
Freedom of information
Government employees
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Wages
 U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Kathie Ann Whipple, Acting Director.
 Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows: PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS 1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. 2. In appendix C to subpart B, the wage area listing for the State of Connecticut is amended by revising the listings for New Haven-Hartford and New London; for the State of Massachusetts, by revising the listing for Central and Western Massachusetts; and for the State of Rhode Island, by revising the listing for Narragansett Bay, to read as follows: Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas 
 **CONNECTICUT****New Haven-Hartford***Survey Area*Connecticut:HartfordNew Haven*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Connecticut:FairfieldLitchfieldMiddlesexTolland**New London***Survey Area*Connecticut:New London*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Connecticut:Windham*    *    *    *    ***MASSACHUSETTS***    *    *    *    ***Central and Western Massachusetts***Survey Area*Massachusetts:The following cities and towns in:*Hampden County*AgawamChicopeeEast LongmeadowFeeding HillsHampdenHolyokeLongmeadowLudlowMonsonPalmerSouthwickSpringfieldThree RiversWestfieldWest SpringfieldWilbraham*Hampshire County*EasthamptonGranbyHadleyNorthamptonSouth Hadley*Worcester County*WarrenWest Warren*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Massachusetts:BerkshireFranklinWorcester (except Blackstone and Millville)The following cities and towns in:*Hampshire County*AmherstBelchertownChesterfieldCummingtonGoshenHatfieldHuntingtonMiddlefieldPelhamPlainfieldSouthamptonWareWesthamptonWilliamsburgWorthington*Hampden County*BlandfordBrimfieldChesterGranvilleHollandMontgomeryRussellTollandWales*Middlesex County*AshbyShirleyTownsendNew Hampshire:BelknapCarrollCheshireGraftonHillsboroughMerrimackSullivanVermont:AddisonBenningtonCaledoniaEssexLamoilleOrangeOrleansRutlandWashingtonWindhamWindsor( print page 12282)*    *    *    *    ***RHODE ISLAND****Narragansett Bay***Survey Area*Rhode Island:BristolNewportThe following cities and towns:*Kent County*AnthonyCoventryEast GreenwichGreeneWarwickWest Warwick*Providence County*AshtonBurrillvilleCentral FallsCranstonCumberlandCumberland HillEast ProvidenceEsmondForestdaleGreenvilleHarrisvilleJohnstonLincolnManvilleMaplevilleNorth ProvidenceNorth SmithfieldOaklandPascoagPawtucketProvidenceSaylesvilleSlatersvilleSmithfieldValley FallsWallum LakeWoonsocket*Washington County*DavisvilleGalileeLafayetteNarragansettNorth KingstownPoint JudithQuonset PointSaunderstownSlocumMassachusetts:The following cities and towns:*Bristol County*AttleboroFall RiverNorth AttleboroRehobothSeekonkSomersetSwanseaWestport*Norfolk County*CaryvillePlainvilleSouth Bellingham*Worcester County*BlackstoneMillville*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Rhode Island:The following cities and towns in:*Kent County*West Greenwich*Providence County*FosterGlocesterScituate*Washington County*CharlestownExeterHopkintonNew ShorehamRichmondSouth KingstownWesterlyMassachusetts:The following cities and towns in:*Bristol County*AcushnetBerkleyDartmouthDightonFairhavenFreetownMansfieldNew BedfordNortonRaynhamTaunton*    *    *    *    *


[FR Doc. E9-6364 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325-39-P