alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report

I, Steven Spooner, Chief Financial Officer of Mitel Networks Corporation (Mitel), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Mitel, for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mitel.

Dated: September 14, 2010



/s/    STEVE
SPOONERName:

Steve SpoonerTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddy Abad, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 61]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered July 17, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 8V3 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. The hearing court (171 Misc 2d 744) correctly determined that the livery cab in which defendant was a passenger was stopped with the consent of the driver/owner, who was a participant in a program wherein he registered with the Police Department, giving his consent to have the police stop the cab for limited visual inspections and safety inquiries. The driver/owner posted decals on the vehicle alerting the police and the riding public that such anticipatory consent had been given. There is nothing unconstitutional about such a program *(see, United States v Woodrum,*202 F3d 1, 8-13). Thus, the stop was properly made on the basis of the driver’s consent, which was binding on defendant-passenger *(see, People v Lane,*10 NY2d 347, 353; *People v Parker,*218 AD2d 713, *lv denied*86 NY2d 874). The opening of the car doors was justified by defendant’s movements, which gave rise to the officers’ reasonable suspicion that defendant might have a weapon *(see, People v Worthy,*261 *400AD2d 277, *lv denied*93 NY2d 1029), and the drugs in .plain view, recognizable by their packaging, were properly seized. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Ellerin, JJ.
Crossroads Capital, Inc. 10-K

Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) of Crossroads Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ben. H. Harris, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| |       | /s/
    Ben H. Harris J.D.
| | ----- | --------------------------
| | Name: | Ben
    H. Harris, J.D.   
| | Date: | March
    31, 2017        





69
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Bay View Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Okubo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 13, 2004

                                        /s/ John Okubo
                                        ----------------------------
                                        John Okubo
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bay View Capital Corporation and will be retained by Bay View
Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, May 7, 2009, Friday, May 8, 2009, and Saturday, May 9, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, May 7, 2009 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., Friday, May 8, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturday, May 9, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Central Time in Dallas, TX. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office, Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated:  March 17, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-6386 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______ __________________ No. 14

- 15040 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:1 4

- cr
- 00 11 7

- LSC

- SGC

- 2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus MATTHEW DAVID AYERS , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabam a

________________________ ( September 3, 2015 )
Before ED CARNES , Chief Judge, JULIE CARNES a nd FAY Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-15040 Date Filed: 09/03/2015 Page: 1 of 22 W. Scott Brower , appointed counsel for Matthew David Ayers in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel ’ s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of me rit,
counsel ’ s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Ayers’s conviction s and total

sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 14-15040 Date Filed: 09/03/2015 Page: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7437

JAMES GREGORY ARMISTEAD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SUPERINTENDENT MILLIS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:18-hc-02063-BO)

Submitted: March 8, 2019 Decided: March 14, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James G. Armistead, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Gregory Armistead seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice as successive. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the 

district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that 

the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Armistead has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
| (1)            | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  (2)            | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May 5, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Thomas A. Rose                                     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Thomas A. Rose                                              |   |
|                     |   | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                     |   |                                                        |   |
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cornerstone
Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2008
(the "Report"), I, Keith Winchester, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, to
my knowledge certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         A.       the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         B.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:      March 30, 2009                            By: /s/ Keith Winchester
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Keith Winchester
                                                     Executive Financial Officer
----

Corrigendum to the notice ‘Holidays in 2005’

(Official Journal of the European Union C 65 of 17 March 2005)

(2005/C 123/10)

On page 3, against the entry ‘IRELAND’, ‘1.6’ shall read ‘6.6’.

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cornerstone
Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2008
(the "Report"), I, George W. Matteo, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, to my knowledge certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         A.       the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         B.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:      March 30, 2009                          By: /s/ George W. Matteo, Jr.
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   George W. Matteo, Jr.,
                                                   President and Chief Executive
                                                   Officer
### SERVED : N4ARC H 28 , 201 2 •y-pARTMEM TO F

iVAMSPORWlO N •r.iy.( n OPERATIONS . 1 - "^" 1 

### m^UR2 0 P 2 : 3

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTERO F E D STAU B & SON S PETROLEUM , INC . FA A DOCKE T No . IT O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penall y Action ) DM S No . FAA-20M-006 7 ORDE R O F DISMISSA L O n Marc h 9 , 2011 , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) fileda Complaint . O n Februar

y 23 , 2011 , E

dStau b & Son s Petroleum , Inc . ("Respondent" ) ha d filedaReques t

fo r Hearing . O n Marc h 15 , 2012 , Responden t withdre w it s Reques t

fo r Hearing , citin g settlement . 14 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "A l an y lime before o r

durin g ahearing , a

n agenc y attorne y ma

y withdraw acomplain t

o r part y ma y withdra w areques t

fo r ahearin g withou t th e consen t

of th e administrativ e la

w judge . I

f a n agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r aparty withdraw s th e reques t fo r ahearin g an

dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceedings.unde r thi s subpar t wit h prejudice. " WHEREFORE . Respondent' s Withdrawa l o f Reques t fo r Hearing , havin g been readandconsidered , i

t i s ORDERE D a s follows : I . Respondent' s Withdrawal of Reques t fo r Hearin g b e an

di s hereb y granted ; an

d2 . Thi s proceedin g b e an di s hereb y dismisse dwit h prejudice .

Richar dC . Goodwi n Administrativ e La

w Judg e Aliachmen i - Servic e Lis tFDMSNo . FAA-2011-006 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , DC 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docket Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Rust y Rinchart , Respondent' s Counse l Rinehar t Law Office s Attorney s an dCounselor s a t La w 210 5 S . Basco mAvenue , Suite 34 0 Campbell , C

A 9500 8 TEL : 408-871-269 6 FAX : 408-871-275 7 Patric k K . Tillman , Esq . La w Offic e o f

Patric k K. . Tillman 202 1 Tli e Alameda . Suite 16 0 Sa n Jose , C A 9512 6 Kyl e Lomazow , Complalnan i ' s Counse l Attorney . Offic e o f

th e Regional Counse l Nortliwes t

Mountai n Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue . S W Renton , WA 9805 5 TEL : 425-227-184 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwin , Adminisirativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-A dviso r 202-366-512 1 Staf

f Assisant/Paralega l FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r ser\'ic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , us e th

e followin g address : Fedcni

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigli t Building

Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 . Atiention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
Exhibit 23.1











Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement on
Form F-3 of Ecopetrol S.A., filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 12, 2010, of our report dated February 15, 2008 (except
for Notes 33 and 34 to which the date is May 30, 2008), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Ecopetrol S.A., which is included in
Ecopetrol S.A.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009.





/s/ Francisco J. González
  R.Francisco
      J. González R.Independent
      Accountant(Statutory
      Auditor of Ecopetrol S.A. until March 31, 2008)Professional
      Card 13442-TDesignated
      by Ernst & Young Audit Ltda.
TR-530





Bogotá,
D.C., Colombia


July 12,
2010
Exhibit 32.2

AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, I, Martin Wolfe, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated.

Date: April 15, 2016

/s/ Martin Wolfe

Martin Wolfe, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
LANCE R. LEFLEUR ROBERT J. BENTLEY DIRECTOR CiOVERNOR


### Alabama Department of Environmental Management

adem.aiabama.gov 1400 Coliseum Blvd. 36110-2400■ 

### Post Office Box 301463

Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463 (334) 271-7700■ 

### FAX (334) 271-7950


## June 5, 2015

Ms. hieather McTeer Toney Regional Administrator, EPA Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center 01 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 Re: Request for Withdrawal of 335-3-14-.05(1)(h) in May 2, 2011, SIP Submission On May 2, 2011, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to EPA Region 4 to incorporate federal requirements for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5). Revisions were made to Rule 335-3-14-.05 (permits) to align ADEM's regulations with EPA's regulations and requirements as published on December 31, 2002, November 29, 2005, May 16, 2008, and October 20, 2010. An element of the May 2, 2011, SIP submittal (335-3-14-.05(1)(h)) addressed the "actual —to-potential" test for projects that involve only existing emissions units in nonattainment areas. EPA has transmitted to ADEM its opinion that this subparagraph cannot be approved. Because this provision has such a low likelihood of ever being relevant in Alabama (we have never received a nonattainment new or modified source application), ADEM requests the wit,hdrawal of the prqvision, ADEM Administrative Code 335-3- 14-.05(1)(h), in the May 2, 2011, SIP submittal. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Ron Gore of my staff at (334) 271-7868.
Sincerely,

; 

## r

.~ •. 

## Lance R. L leur Director

LRL:sfc

Birmingham Branch Decatur Branch 1 Moblle Branch Mobile-Coastal 110 Vulcan Road 2715 Sandlin Road, S. W. * * 2204 Perimeter Road 4171 Commanders Drive Birmingham, AL 35209-4702 Decatur, AL 35603-1333 * Mobile, AL 36615-1131 Mobile, AL 36615-1421 (205) 942-6168 (256) 353-1713 r! 1-' (251) 450-3400 (251) 432-6533 (205) 941-1603 (FAX) (256) 340-9359 (FAX)

~ 1T S 4 " (251) 479-2593 (FAX) (251) 432-6598 (FAX)
Exhibit 23.1

 

*MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED*

|   | *ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORS* |
|--------|----------------------------|

|   | ***PCAOB REGISTERED*** |
|--------|------------------------|

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Numbeer, Inc, of our report dated July 7, 2009 on our audit of the financial statements of Numbeer, Inc as of May 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 and since inception on April 7, 2008 through May 31, 2009, and the reference to us under            the caption “Experts.”

 

 

 

 

***/s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered***

Moore & Associates Chartered

Las Vegas, Nevada

July 21, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

*6490 West Desert Inn Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501*