alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, May 28, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Issue Committee will be held Thursday, May 28, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please                           ( print page 12461)                        contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

March 17, 2009.

 Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-6361 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued020465NF
Express Cargo USA LLC,1675 York Avenue, #31B, New York, NY 10128
January 10, 2009.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. E9-6594 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
ex10.1

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 

 



 



 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

image

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

 



 

ex10.1 image

 

 

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Vice PresidentFinance,
Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:   March 21, 2005
    /s/ Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.Chief Financial Officer, Vice President -
Finance, Treasurer and Secretary
Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. A signed original of this written statement or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bakers Footwear
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
-77.8 -77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6

 38.4

 38.6

 38.8

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

★

■

■

■ ■

★

●

●

★

●

●

● ●
J~~~ED STqT

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o e WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

7- ~{f~i z 0 

~yr'QC PROj~G~\ 

JUL 2 1 2C ~ i 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

J. R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

We received your letter dated July 20, 2011, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertification memo the Carlsbad Field Office 

(CBFO) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Oak Ridge National 

Laboratory (ORNL). We concur with the draft recertification memo to recertify ORNL's TRU 

waste characterization program. 

In accordance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583), on 

August 21, 2008, EPA approved ORNL's contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) waste 

characterization program (See EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, II-A4-103). While, on and 

February 3, 2009, EPA approved ORNL's remote-handled (RH) TRU waste characterization 

program (See EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, II-A4-111). 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU wastes are 

appropriately included in Attachment 4 of the draft recertification memo. The waste 

characterization equipment, procedures and processes mentioned in the ORNL draft 

recertii-ication memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. 

I'liank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification memo for 

ORNL-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

Rajani Joglekar 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Court Fesmire, CBFO NTP 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA 

Site Documents, CBFO 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of 1 Minnesot a, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Raymond L . Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.



## United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 95-3849

___________ James Santa, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner * of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 7, 1997 Filed: August 27, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James Santa appeals the district court & s decision granting summary judgment to 1 the Co mmissioner, and affirming the Commissioner & s determination that Santa & s retirement benefits are subject to the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) of the-2-

Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 415(a)(7). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties & submissions, we affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis of the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge & s report. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMAN DOUGLAS DIAMOND, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DOES, 

Unknown Employees of the United States, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-55376 

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-06327-ODWPJW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Otis D. Wright, II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2019**

Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Norman Douglas Diamond, a resident of Japan, appeals pro se from the 

district court’s judgment dismissing his action seeking tax refunds and damages 

arising from various interactions with defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of res judicata. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-55376 

Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp, 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Diamond’s claims for unauthorized 

disclosure as barred by the doctrine of res judicata because Diamond litigated these 

claims in a prior action that resulted in a final judgment on the merits. See Tahoe–

Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg’l Planning Agency, 322 F.3d 1064, 1077 

(9th Cir. 2003) (requirements for res judicata).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Diamond’s motion 

to transfer venue as to nonresident Diamond’s internal revenue tax claims because 

venue was not proper in any district court. See Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc., 

211 F.3d 495, 498 (9th Cir. 2000) (standard of review); see also 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1402(a)(1) (providing that any action filed in district court against the United 

States “may be prosecuted only . . . in the judicial district where the plaintiff 

resides”). To the extent that Diamond alleged damages claims arising from 

defendants’ acts or omissions in the District of Columbia, denial of Diamond’s 

request to transfer venue was not an abuse of discretion because Diamond failed to 

show why it was in the interest of justice to transfer rather than dismiss without 

prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (“The district court of a district in which is 

filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in 
3 18-55376 

the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could 

have been brought.”).

AFFIRMED.
[No. 29857-1-II.

Division Two.

May 25, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Zachary J. Finders, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 02-1-02045-3, Robert L. Harris, J., entered January 21, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Seinfeld, J. Pro Tern.
EXHIBIT 32





OCTAGON 88 RESOURCES, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Octagon 88 Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald Hryhor, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 23, 2011
By:
/s/Donald HryhorName:
Donald HryhorTitle:
Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,572] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 12, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of the workers at BHp Billiton, BHP Copper, Inc., Pinto Valley Operations & San Manuel Arizona Railroad Company, Miami, Arizona. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition TA-W-65,447 filed on February 27, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of March 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6289 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
James R. LAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106438

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: March 19, 2019

Alexandria Shah, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Justin Moody, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

James R. Lake ("Lake") appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Lake pleaded guilty to first-degree assault and first-degree robbery and was sentenced to two concurrent sentences of twenty years in prison. In his sole point on appeal, Lake argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing because plea counsel was ineffective for failing to properly advise Lake about a self-defense claim. The record clearly refutes Lake's claim that his guilty plea was involuntary or unknowing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *200error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 31.2**
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
I, Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr., certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) [reserved]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     June 14, 2005 /s/ Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.       Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.   Chief Financial Officer   Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.   (Principal Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,645] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 11, 2008, in response to a petition filed by the International Chemical Workers Union/United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 888C, on behalf of workers of Columbian Chemicals Company, Marshall Plant, Proctor, West Virginia. 

The Department has determined that this petition is a photocopy of petition number TA-W-64,606 that was instituted on December 8, 2008. The Department, on December 29, 2008, issued a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance and alternative trade adjustment assistance, applicable to all workers of the subject firm separated from employment on or after December 8, 2007 through December 29, 2010. 

Therefore, further investigation in this petition would serve no purpose, and the investigation is terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of December 2008. 

 Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer,  Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-637 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P