alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Netventory Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
C. Dela Cruz, Chief Executive Officer an Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 20, 2010


/s/ Ronald C. Dela Cruz
------------------------------------
Ronald C. Dela Cruz
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,161]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 6, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of TG Missouri Corporation, Perryville, Missouri.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 5th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-5908 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 10.1
   In the Matter of 
SOUTHERN
COMMUNITY BANK
FAYETTEVILLE, GEORGIA 
(INSURED
STATE NONMEMBER BANK)
    
    )
)
)
)
)
)
)
    
    ORDER
TO
CEASE AND DESIST
 
FDIC-08-156b




---



##### 



ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST
          2




---



##### 



BOARD OF DIRECTORS
   3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



MANAGEMENT
     5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



CAPITAL
      8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



th
   CHARGE-OFF
  10




---



##### 



REDUCTION OF CLASSIFIED ITEMS
       11




---



##### 



NO ADDITIONAL CREDIT
   12




---



##### 



PLANS FOR REDUCING/IMPROVING CLASSIFIED ASSETS
  13




---



##### 



SPECIAL MENTION
  LENDING PRACTICES
       14




---



##### 



Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending Sound Risk Management Practices
 15




---



##### 



CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT
 Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate
Lending Sound Risk Management Practices
  LOAN REVIEW AND GRADING SYSTEM
  16




---



##### 



ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
  PLAN TO IMPROVE EARNINGS
  17




---



##### 



WRITTEN STRATEGIC PLAN
  CASH DIVIDENDS
  LIQUIDITY AND FUNDS MANAGEMENT
  18




---



##### 



19




---



##### 



ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
    20




---



##### 



BANK SECRECY ACT/INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS
   ELIMINATE/CORRECT ALL VIOLATIONS OF LAW
   21




---



##### 



DISCLOSURE
  PROGRESS REPORTS
  22




---



##### 



Mark S. Schmidt
Regional Director
Atlanta Region    Robert M. Braswell
Commissioner
Department of Banking and Finance
State of Georgia 23
EXHIBIT 32(a)

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of Jordan Industries,
Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report") of the Registrant for the year
ended December 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. ss.78m(a)) and that the information contained in the Annual Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

Date: March 24, 2005

/s/  John W. Jordan II
------------------------------------
John W. Jordan II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                                                                                                              
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Bruce C. Sexton
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Bruce C. Sexton, Chief Financial Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
Stock Purchase Agreement



 Exhibit 10.19 
 Kopin Taiwan Corporation (KTC) 
 No. 2-1, Li-Hsin Road,
Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan, R.O.C. 
 Tel: 886-3-579-8181
        Fax: 886-3-578-8865 
  
  
 July 21, 2009

 Kopin Corporation 
 695 Myles Standish Blvd. 
 Taunton, MA 02780 
 U.S.A. 
 Dear Sir/Madam, 
 According to the meeting resolution of the Board of Directors of Kopin Taiwan Corporation (KTC) dated on May 21, 2009, KTC will raise additional funds of NT$200 million dollars by issuing 20,000,000 shares at NT$10 per share, for
purchasing equipment, reimbursing loan and providing working capital to expand KTC’s business needs. 
 Moreover, per Article 267 of
Company Law of the Republic of China, KTC shall reserve 10% of the new shares which is equivalent to 2,000,000 shares for subscription by employees of the company. Except those reserved, 90% of the new shares which is equivalent to 18,000,000 shares
will be in proportion respectively to the original shareholding to subscribe for, with preemptive right. New shares left unsubscribed by original shareholders and employees of KTC up to July 20, 2009 will be open for subscription by specific
person or persons through negotiation. 
 As of July 20, 2009, the subscribed shares and amount by original shareholders and employees of
KTC are 427,532 shares and 4,275,320 NT dollars. Therefore, KTC would like to propose to allocate all the remaining 19,572,468 shares to Kopin Corp. to complete the recapitalization. 
 To subscribe your allotted shares, you could remit the subscription payment on July 24, 2009. 
 The details of your allotted subscription are as follows: 
 The original number of
shareholding: 1,568,762 shares 
 New shares left unsubscribed: 19,572,468 shares 
 The number of shares can be subscribed: 19,572,468 shares 
 The price of each share: NT$10 
 The total subscribed amount: NT$195,724,680 
 The name and address of bank to collect payment on shares on behalf of the company: 
  
  

			
	Payee:	  	Kopin Taiwan Corporation
	Bank Name:	  	 Chang Hwa Commercial Bank, Ltd.
 Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park Branch

	Bank Address:	  	 2F Joint Service Building
 No. 5, Industry E. Road Vi, Science-Based Industrial Park,
 Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C.

	Swift #:	  	CCBCTWTP575
	A/C #:	  	5758-22-598909-00

 Your attention on this matter is highly
appreciated. Should you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact us. 
  

	
	Yours very truly,
	
	 /s/    Chi Hsieh

	 Chi Hsieh
 Chairman of the Board
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of  Bloggerwave, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Ulrik Svane Thomsen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

















/s/
Ulrik Svane Thomsen


By: Ulrik
Svane Thomsen


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





Dated:
March 30, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





1
Johnny A. HURD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81321

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: APRIL 16, 2019

Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Nathan Jeremy Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Johnny A. Hurd appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing, after he pleaded guilty to first-degree tampering and driving with a revoked license. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Samuel S. SHAFFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81409

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: January 15, 2019

Susan Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Samuel Shaffer appeals from a Saline County Circuit Court judgment denying his 29.15 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Shaffer was found guilty by a jury of one count of stealing in March 2015. The court sentenced him to twelve years in prison as a prior and persistent offender.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development
Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

May 22, 2006
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                                906 CERTIFICATION

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the period ended March 31, 2003, I, Andrew J. Ryback, Senior Vice President,
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Plumas Bancorp.

Dated: May 12, 2003

                         /s/ Andrew J. Ryback
                        ---------------------
Randall ABERNATHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 106366

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: February 19, 2019

James C. Egan, 1000 W. Nifong Blvd, Bdg. 7, Suite 100, Colombia, MO 65203, for appellant.

Eric S. Schmitt, Justin A. Moody, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Randall Abernathy (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).
Fatosha Takila BROWN, Appellant, v. MISSOURI STATE BOARD OF NURSING, Respondent.

WD 81797

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: April 23, 2019

David F. Barrett, for Appellant.

Kevin R. Hall, for Respondent.

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Fatosha Brown appeals from the decisions of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) and the Missouri State Board of Nursing (Board), as affirmed by the Circuit Court of Cole County, finding cause to discipline and censuring her nursing license. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
CHARLESTON.

#### Bosworth v. Wilson.

Submitted January 12, 1905.

Decided January 31, 1905.

*Demuhrur*— Appeal.

An order merely sustaining a demurrer to a bill in equity, not dismissing the bill, is not appealable, (p. 81.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County.

Bill by A. S. Bosworth and another against W. G. Wilson and others. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the bill, complainants appeal.

*Dismissed.*

W. B. Maxwell, for appellants.

Daily & Bowers, for appelles.

*81BRAnnon, President.

To a bill in equity in the circuit court of Randolph county filed by Boswortli and Rum'barger against Wilson and others a demurrer was entered, and the court made an order which sustained the demurrer and gave leave to file a second amended bill.

From this order an appeal has been taken.

This Court cannot consider the merits. The law gives it no jurisdiction of an appeal from such a decree, for want of finality. The order is interlocutory. The court can retract it and make an opposite ruling. An order merely sustaining a demurrer, but not dismissing the bill, is not appealable. It is a mere opinion not carried out. *Gillespie*v. *Colemam*98 Va. 276; 2 Ency. Pl. & Prac. 114; 2 Cyc. 605. The case, of *White*v. *C. & O. R. Co.,*26 W. Va. 800, rules this case.. It holds that an order sustaining a demurrer and giving leave to amend a declaration is not appealable.

Even if the feature of leave to amend were absent, and it were only an order sustaining a demurrer, no appeal would lie; but that feature makes it plainer that the order is not final. 2 Cyc. 605; 601; 2 Ency. Pl. & Prac. 114. See *Hannah*v. *Bank,*53 W. Va. 82.

The case of *Gillispie*v. *Coleman, supra,*holds that there is no appeal whether the order sustains or overrules a demurrer. *Parsons*v. *Snyder,*42 W. Va. 511, holds that an order overruling a demurrer will not support an appeal.

We dismiss the appeal as improvidently granted.

*Dismissed.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 27, 2018

t0723 

# Order

Clerk July 27, 2018

156284 (21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156284

COA: 337141

Saginaw CC: 08

- 030784

- FC

ROBERT DERRELL RUCKER

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 29, 2018

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does n ot appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7695** 

JESSIE L. BRADSHAW , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Jackson L. Kiser , Senior District Judge. ( 7:14

- cv - 00654

- JLK

- RSB )

Submitted : March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jessie L. Bradshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jessie L. Bradshaw seeks to appeal the distri ct court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the d istrict court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Bra dshaw has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presente d in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P.(the “Registrant”), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: November 14, 2005
exv10w1









Exhibit 10.1




2010 Annual Base Salaries




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Prior Base Salary	 	2010 Base Salary
	Douglas C. Bryant 

President and Chief Executive Officer

	 	$	450,000	 	 	$	468,000	 
	John M. Radak 

Chief Financial Officer

	 	$	290,270	 	 	$	300,429	 
	Robert J. Bujarski

Senior Vice President, Business
Development and General Counsel

	 	$	288,000	 	 	$	302,400	 
	Scot M. McLeod

Senior Vice President, Operations

	 	$	258,440	 	 	$	268,778	 
	Timothy T. Stenzel

Chief Scientific Officer

	 	$	285,000	 	 	$	290,700	 
	John D. Tamerius 

Senior Vice President, Clinical and Regulatory
Affairs

	 	$	263,000	 	 	$	273,520