alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 29242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12474]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2011-0060]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Report of Overdue Accounts Under Short-Term Policies 
EIB 92-27.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the information 
necessary to monitor the borrower's payments for exported goods covered 
under its short and medium-term export credit insurance policies. It 
also alerts Ex-Im Bank staff of defaults, so they can manage the 
portfolio in an informed manner.
    Form can be viewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/EIB92_27.pdf.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before June 20, 2011 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://
www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-
0027.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 92-27. Report of Overdue Accounts Under 
Short-Term Policies.
    OMB Number: 3048-0027.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the 
information necessary to monitor the borrower's payments for exported 
goods covered under its short and medium-term export credit insurance 
policies. It also alerts Ex-Im Bank staff of defaults, so they can 
manage the portfolio in an informed manner.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 396.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 33 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Monthly.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-12474 Filed 5-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 560 

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005 

Ms. LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the 

Peace Corps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peace Stamp for the 

5 Peace Corps Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PEACE CORPS STAMP. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States Postal Service 

8 shall, for a 2-year period beginning no later than 12 
2 

HR 560 IH 

1 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, issue 

2 a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps. 

3 (b) REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITIES.—The 

4 issuance of such semipostal and the disposition of the 

5 amounts becoming available from the issuance of such 

6 semipostal shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, 

7 United States Code, subject to the following: 

8 (1) The differential included in the rate of post9 age established for such semipostal under section 

10 416(c) of such title may not exceed 25 percent. 

11 (2) The Peace Corps shall be the sole agency to 

12 which any amounts becoming available from the sale 

13 of such semipostal may be transferred under section 

14 416(d)(1) of such title. 

15 (c) SEMIPOSTAL DEFINED.—For purposes of this 

16 section, the term ‘‘semipostal’’ has the meaning given such 

17 term by section 416(a)(1) of such title. 

Æ
Section 1350 Certification





STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned is the CEO and President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) of Sauer Energy, Inc.  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sauer Energy, Inc. for the year ended August 31, 2010.





The undersigned certifies that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sauer Energy, Inc. as of August 31, 2010.





This Certification is executed as of December 13, 2010.





/s/ Dieter R. Sauer, Jr.


Dieter R. Sauer, Jr.


CEO and President
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate:  August 16, 2004This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
W~F -- - I ‘-~ - IC A~IF 0 RN IA

0 50 100 Miles - ____i~ou~y,CA

HAWAI ~

DESIGNATIONS IN US EP

1997 8-HOUR O

NATIONALAMBIENT AIR Q

• Nonattainment/Su

Nonattainment, S

I I Nonattainment/SuI I Nonattainment/SuI I Nonattainment/SuI I Nonattainment/Su

• I I Attainment (Main

Unclassifiable/Att

The revoked 1997 primary and secondary national am

8-hour ozone are 0 08parts per million (ppm) Areas 

• attainment. Other Pacific territories under EPA Regi

ignated “Unclassifiable/Attainment”

Sources: Title 40 CFR Part SI, §303, 305, 312, 329 355645 (September 17, 2014), 80 FR 18120 (April 3,2

A1R1500029_l .mxd (April 13,2015) 

Sutter €ou~ity (psi~t~,-CA.~

(Sutter Buttes)”-)

San Francisco

Bay~~ ‘—~~~r

County (Western part), CA

A~ A~

Calaveras Cos., CA

untain Cos.)

~m~jr~n

0

Kern Co.(Eastern Kern), CA

\~

—~-Z~ - Los~ngeles

~fftTh@i~~Air Basin, t~S

Los An~(Westet

Morongo B~

‘I A

(Coache

Th~

~ Diego,~ ~- Pechanga.Reservation (Attainm~iit)
Santa BarbaraSanta Maria

Lompoc Area

East

Kern

County ~rr~I~rn~

~t~fl I Morongo Band of Mission In~ians

~AL’1FORN’1A

iChico Area

YubaCityArea ~‘-

San Francisco

Ba~f~j

NEVADA

San Joaquin

DESIGNATIONS IN 

1-HOU

NATIONAL AMBIENT 

NonattainmNonattainm

I~ I Nonattainm1_I Nonattain

I Nonattain

L I Nonattainm

I Attainmen

I I Unclassifi

The primary and secondary nationa

1-hour ozone are 0.12 parts per mill

designated ‘Nonattainment.’ Other diction (not shown on map) are desSources: Title 40 CFR Part 81, §30378 FR 58189 (September 23, 2013), A1R1300069 I mxd (September 26

— 

ARIZON

2~Pho

Monterey II~g?t1X~!

N

W$E

S

0 25 50 100 Miles

I I I I’ ! I I I I

G(IJAM?

C.

Ventura County Area

~O~Los Ang~I~s-So,uth~~’

Air Basin~Area’i7

s.~

HAWAII Area’~

Imperial

County Area
DESIGNATIO

8-Hour 

NATIONAL AMBIENT 

NonattNonatt

1J NonattE~J Nonatt~ Nonatt~ Unclas

San

~

Francisco

Sources: Federal Docket No. EPA-H

(April 30,2012), ESRI (2006), TANA American Samoa and Northern Man

on map) are designated ‘Unclassifia

N

w4:E

0’ ‘25 50 100

I I I I I I I I I

nty, CA

IZON

Desert), CA

Countie

Indians

HAWA Indians
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Carroll Shelby, certify that:

 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A OF CarrollShelby International Inc.

 

2.                    Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.                    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

 

4.                    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)                        designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)                       evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)                        presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.                    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)                        all significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

b)                       any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.                    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date: November 15, 2004 |   | /s/ CARROLL SHELBY  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Carroll Shelby, Director |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                                                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano                                                                                          
|                       |  |     |  | Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Circus and
Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of TierOne Corporation
(Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               June 30, 2006 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 1, 2006 | By:/s/ Eugene B. Witkowicz           
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                      | Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive Vice  
|                      | President and Chief Financial Officer
Latroy M. SANDERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 106073

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: January 8, 2019

Maleaner R. Harvey, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Latroy Sanders appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgement and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.151 . We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. (2017), unless otherwise indicated.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 08/25/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Clean Power Plan Letter of Support from Colorado Western Slope Entities

SUMMARY

EPA Administrator, Gina McCarthy, and EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator, Shaun McGrath, received 

a letter of support from various Colorado Western Slope entities, including elected officials, businesses, 

and health professionals. The letter is dated August 14, 2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

Attachment

Letter of Support
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Federal Advisory Committee Act; Technological Advisory Council

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice of intent to reestablish.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
purpose of this notice is to announce that a Federal Advisory 
Committee, known as the ``Technological Advisory Council'' (hereinafter 
the ``TAC'') is being reestablished.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Attn: Jon M. Peha, Chief 
Technologist, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 7-C324, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon M. Peha, Chief Technologist, 
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 7-C324, 
Washington, DC 20554. Telephone: (202) 418-2406, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#761c19185806131e173610151558111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6bcb9b8f8a6b3beb796b0b5b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Chairman of the Federal Communications 
Commission has determined that the reestablishment of the Council is 
necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance 
of duties imposed on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) by 
law. The Committee Management Secretariat, General Services 
Administration concurs with the reestablishment of the Council. The 
purpose of the TAC is to provide technical advice to the Federal 
Communications Commission and to make recommendations on the issues and 
questions presented to it by the FCC. The TAC will address questions 
referred to it by the FCC Chairman, the FCC Chief Technologist, the 
Chief of the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology, or the TAC 
Designated Federal Officer. The questions referred to the TAC will be 
directed to technological and technical issues in the field of 
communications. The duties of the TAC will be to gather data and 
information, perform analyses, and prepare reports and presentations to 
respond to the questions referred to it.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-6463 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen J. Fanning, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Solta Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Solta Medical, Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |        |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 4, 2011 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Stephen J. Fanning               
|                  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Stephen J. Fanning                   
|                  |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

I,
John F. Glenn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Solta Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Solta Medical, Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 4, 2011 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ John F. Glenn      
|                  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | John F. Glenn          
|                  |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-4372

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BRYAN A. VANMETER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-4) Submitted: August 26, 2005 Decided: September 12, 2005 Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian J. Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Sherry Muncy, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bryan A. Vanmeter appeals a district court judgment revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to 10 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Vanmeter’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), claiming there are no meritorious issues on appeal, but raising the question of whether the district court erred in using a certified copy of a sentencing order to establish Vanmeter violated a condition of supervised release by committing another crime. Counsel also raises the issue as to whether the sentence was in error. Vanmeter did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Finding no error, we affirm. We review the district court’s decision to revoke a defendant’s supervised release for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Copley , 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992). The district court need only find a violation of a condition of supervised release by a preponderance of the evidence. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005). Factual determinations are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Carothers , 337 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir. 2003). We find the certified copy of the sentence order was more than sufficient to support the court’s decision to revoke supervised release.- 3 - With respect to Vanmeter’s sentence, it did not exceed the statutory maximum and was plainly reasonable. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(4) (2000). Pursuant to Anders , we have examined the entire record and find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Vanmeter’s judgment. This court requires counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests a petition be filed, but counsel believes such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED