alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 - Certifications






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Donald C. Jones, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that this report on Form 10-K of Cyber Informatix, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in this report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the  financial  condition  and results of operations of  Cyber Informatix, Inc.






Date:  January 28, 2010





/s/ Donald C. Jones


Donald C. Jones, Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer,


Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Director





/s/ Terry G. Bowering


Terry G. Bowering
Secretary, Treasurer
Director
CERTIFICATIONS  I, Paul W. Kuhn, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avrupa Minerals Ltd.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.   April 26, 2013 Date:  ________________________   /s/ Paul W. Kuhn _____________________________ Paul W. Kuhn President and CEO
Willie J. EVANS, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106362

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: February 13, 2019

Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Willie J. Evans, Sr. ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his trial counsel was ineffective. Finding that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WILLIAM C. HOLMAN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00012

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1567363R)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J.

, Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
1/23/2015 Appendix K ­ Laboratory Data Report

http://www.elibrary.dep.state.pa.us/dsweb/View/Collection­12319 1/2

Guest Login Search In: This Collection Advanced

Properties

Home Content Map What's New Users & Groups Help

Appendix K ‐ Laboratory Data Report

2900­RE­DEP4478

PLEASE NOTE: If you need to see details on the documents listed here such as effective or expiration dates, click on the Properties icon ( ) on

the right side of the page relative to the file name.

Refresh

Type Title Edited Size Actions

Alpha Spec 01/13/15 4

Cooler Receipt Checklists 01/13/15 1

Gamma Data 01/13/15 1706

Gamma Logbook 01/13/15 1

Gross Alpha Beta Filter Wipe Logbook 01/14/15 1

Gross Alpha Beta Filter Wipe SSS 01/14/15 1

Gross Alpha Beta Water Batch Logbook 01/14/15 1

Gross Alpha Gross Beta Filter Wipes 01/14/15 14

Gross Alpha Gross Beta Water 01/14/15 63

Radium­226 01/14/15 3

Location: Home Publications Radiation Protection Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radio... Appendix K ­ Laboratory Data

Report Listing
1/23/2015 Appendix K ­ Laboratory Data Report

http://www.elibrary.dep.state.pa.us/dsweb/View/Collection­12319 2/2

Links History

Radium­228 01/14/15 5

Radon Data ­ BRP 01/14/15 2

Round 1 Completed Ingrown Sample Sheets 01/14/15 2

Round 1 Completed Sample Sheets 01/14/15 2

Round 2 Completed Ingrown Sample Sheets 01/14/15 2

Round 2 Completed Sample Sheets 01/14/15 3

Round 3 Completed Ingrown Sample Sheets ­ 2013 01/14/15 1

Round 3 Completed Ingrown Sample Sheets ­ 2014 01/14/15 2

Round 3 Completed Sample Sheets ­ 2013 01/14/15 2

Round 3 Completed Sample Sheets ­ 2014 01/14/15 2

Sample Submission Tracking Sheet 01/14/15 1

Tritium 01/14/15 13

Tritium Logbook 01/14/15 1

XRF Liquid Data 01/14/15 21

XRF Solid Data 01/14/15 12

Refresh

Login (As a Different User)

Account Settings (Guest)

Appendix K ­ Laboratory Data

Report Listing
exv10w22






Exhibit 10.22




Amendment No. 2 to the SXC Health Solutions Corp.

2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan



WHEREAS, SXC Health Solutions Corp. (the “Company”) has adopted the 2007 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the “Plan”); and



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein.



NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 15.2 of the Plan, the Plan hereby is amended as follows:





	1.	 	Section 9.1 of the Plan hereby is amended to delete the phrase “except with the
written consent of the Corporation” as it appears in the last sentence therein.






	2.	 	The penultimate sentence of Section 11.1 of the Plan hereby is amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:




“Fees and expenses of the bank, broker-dealer or similar custodian shall be paid by the
Corporation or allocated in a uniform manner among the respective participants as
determined by the Committee.”




     In all other respects, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance
with its terms.


As adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of SXC Health Solutions
Corp. on March 2, 2010.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2015

No. 04-14-00781-CV

CITY OF SHAVANO PARK,

Appellant

v.

ARD MOR, INC., Texas Ardmor Properties, L.P., and Texas Ardmor Management, LLC,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-10796

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The 

appellee’s brief is due on February 9, 2015.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Attachment 9

Biodegradation Report CBI

Sanitized
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350**

            The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively,the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated: November 14, 2002                                                                                                                             | By: | /s/ GARY L. CARANO |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------------------|
|  
 
 
 
**Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp**.

  |
[Cite as State v. Krug , 2024
- Ohio
- 2603.]



## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

- vs - JON P. KRUG,

Defendant

- Appellant. CASE NO. 2024 - L - 040
Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas

Trial Court No. 2008 CR 000008

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Decided: July 8, 2024 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Charles E. Coulson , Lake County Prosecutor , and Teri R. Daniel , Assistant Prosecutor, Lake County Administration Building, 105 Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff

- Appellee). Jon P. Krug , pro se, PID# A544

- 929, Richland Correctional Institution, 1001 Olivesburg Road, P.O. Box 8107, Mansfield, OH 44901 (Defendant

- Appellant).

MARY JANE TRAPP, J. {¶1} On June 11, 2024, appellant, Jon P. Kru g, filed a pro se n otice of a ppeal from the trial court’s May 7, 2024 judgment entry treat ing appellant’s pro se motions as petitions for postconviction relief and den ying them as untimely without a hearing. {¶2} App.R. 4(A)(1) states that “ a party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.”2

Case No. 2024

- L

- 040 {¶3} Furthermore, p ostconviction proceedings are considered civil in nature. State v. Nichols , 11 Ohio St.3d 40 , 4 0

- 42 (1984); see also State v. Jones , 2021

- Ohio

1696, ¶ 6 ( 11th Dist.)

. {¶4} App.R. 4(A )(3) states , in relevant part: {¶5} “In a civil case, if the clerk has not completed service of notice of the judgment within the three

- day period prescribed in Civ.R. 58(B), the 30

- day periods referenced in App.R. 4(A)(1) and 4(A)(2) begin to run on the date when the clerk actually completes service.” {¶6} Here , there is a notation on the docket reflecting the clerk mailed a copy of
the May 7, 2024 entry to appellant on May 8, 2024, which is within the three

- day period prescribed in Civ.R. 58(B). Therefore, a timely notice of appeal from the May 7, 2024 entry was due no later than June 6, 2024, which was not a holiday or weekend. The appeal is untimely by five days. The time requirement is jurisdiction al in nature and may not be enlarged by an appellate court. State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of
El ections , 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988); see also App.R. 14(B). {¶7} Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.

MATT LYNCH, J. , ROBERT J. PATTON, J. ,
concur

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                             
|------ |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: |  | May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano                                                                                          
|       |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Circus and
Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
**EXHIBIT 21**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT           Percentage    ofParent (at December 31, 2005) Subsidiary OwnershipBay View Capital Corporation Bay View Acceptance Corporation  100%Bay View Capital Corporation Bay View Securitization Corporation  100%Bay View Capital Corporation Bay View Capital I (1) (2)  100%Bay View Capital Corporation FMAC 2000-A Holding Company (1)  100%Bay View Capital Corporation FMAC Franchise Receivables Corporation (1)  100%Bay View Capital Corporation Bay View Commercial Finance Group (1)  100%Bay View Capital Corporation MoneyCare, Inc. (1)  100%Bay View Acceptance Corporation Bay View Receivables Corporation  100%Bay View Acceptance Corporation Bay View Transaction Corporation  100%Bay View Acceptance Corporation Bay View Deposit Corporation  100%Bay View Acceptance Corporation Bay View Warehouse Corporation  100% (1) Inactive subsidiaries. (2) Deconsolidated based on FIN 46.The financial statements of the Registrant are consolidated with those of its subsidiaries.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 401ST DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 30th 

day of October, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Virginia Oak Venture, LLC, and Jane 

Tang, Appellants

v.

O.D. Fought, Jr., et al., Appellees

No. 06-13-00076-CV

Trial Court No. 401-02380-2010

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find partial error in the judgment of the 

court below. Therefore, we find that the trial court erred in awarding judgment for attorney fees 

to Arbor Commercial Funding, LLC, and reverse the judgment of the trial court in its favor and 

render a take-nothing judgment to the extent that it awarded attorney fees to Arbor against Tang. 

We affirm the judgment of the trial court in favor of Lander Kyle Lewallen, Butler Burgher 

Group, LLC, Arbor Commercial Funding, LLC, the Federal National Mortgage Association, 

O.D. Fought, Jr., Sheri Diaz, United Venture Partners, LLC, Chris Wong, Raymond He, Joyce 

He, and Biyou Lao. We also affirm the trial court’s take-nothing judgment in Tang’s action 

against the Michael Group. 

We further order that each party shall bear its own costs of appeal. WHEREFORE, WE 

COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have 

it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 15th day of January, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 277 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 277

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to restore 
            service standards in effect as of July 1, 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2023

     Mr. Bacon (for himself, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Dean of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Pappas, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Ms. Lee of 
   California, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Garbarino, Mr. Bera, Mr. 
 Neguse, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. McGovern, Ms. 
Craig, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Mr. Cuellar, and 
Mr. Smith of Washington) submitted the following resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to restore 
            service standards in effect as of July 1, 2012.

Whereas, on January 5, 2015, the United States Postal Service has implemented 
        lower ``service standards'' to virtually eliminate overnight delivery of 
        first class mail and periodicals, and further delay most other mail;
Whereas the Postal Regulatory Commission found that it was not necessary to 
        degrade postal services to realize substantial cost savings and that 
        there are other ways to save the postal service money without 
        jeopardizing the service Americans rely upon;
Whereas delayed mail negatively impacts businesses, hurts residents, rural 
        communities, and the economy, and drives customers away, resulting in 
        lower revenue and worsens the Postal Service's financial situation; and
Whereas robust service standards implemented by the United States Postal Service 
        are essential to providing prompt and timely delivery of all mail, 
        online purchases, local newspapers, newsletters, bill payments, letters, 
        invitations, packages, and medicines: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures 
to restore service standards in effect as of July 1, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
In the INTEREST OF: M.F.G. and Z.F.G.; Respondents,

Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. M.B., Appellant.

WD 81312

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: January 15, 2019

David Suroff, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Erica McCabe, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Appellant.

Ryan Kaiser, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent, Juvenile Officer.

Elizabeth Walker, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent, Juvenile Officer.

Anika Hickman, Kansas City, MO, Counsel and Guardian Ad Litem for Respondents.

Claire Terrebonne, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel and Guardian Ad Litem for Respondents.

Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.

*658**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Michael Burns appeals a finding of neglect by the Jackson County Circuit Court under section 211.031, R.S.Mo. (2016). For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3960

_____________________________
R AYFIELD P IERCE , J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

. January 11 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. J AY , W INSOR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Ray field Pierce
, Jr

. , pro se, Appellan t

.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Walter Reid Green, Jr., as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green, Jr.Walter Reid Green, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate:  May 23, 2011








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            



|Date: November 9, 2009
|----------------------



|/s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

36