alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.7****REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE** $7,500,000 June 30, 2006     On the Revolving Credit Maturity Date, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, North Pointe Holdings Corporation,a Michigan corporation (“Company”) promises to pay to the order of Fifth Third Bank (“Bank”) careof Comerica Bank, as Agent, at 500 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226, in lawful money of theUnited States of America, the sum of Seven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($7,500,000), orso much of said sum as may from time to time have been advanced and then be outstanding hereunderpursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2006, made by andamong the Company, certain banks, including the Bank, and Comerica Bank as Agent for such banks, asthe same may be amended from time to time (the “Agreement”), together with interest thereon ashereinafter set forth.     Each of the Advances made hereunder shall bear interest at the Applicable Interest Rate fromtime to time applicable thereto under the Agreement or as otherwise determined thereunder, andinterest shall be computed, assessed and payable as set forth in the Agreement.     This Note is a note under which advances (including refundings and conversions), repaymentsand readvances may be made from time to time, but only in accordance with the terms and conditionsof the Agreement. This Note evidences borrowings under, is subject to, is secured in accordancewith, and may be accelerated or matured under, the terms of the Agreement, to which reference ishereby made. Definitions and terms of the Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference herein.     This Note shall be interpreted and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be determinedunder the laws of, and enforceable in, the State of Michigan.     Company hereby waives presentment for payment, demand, protest and notice of dishonor andnonpayment of this Note and agrees that no obligation hereunder shall be discharged by reason ofany extension, indulgence, release, or forbearance granted by any holder of this Note to any partynow or hereafter liable hereon or any present or subsequent owner of any property, real orpersonal, which is now or hereafter security for this Note.
i

 
     Nothing herein shall limit any right granted Bank by any other instrument or by law.         **NORTH POINTE HOLDINGS**
Casitdel WOOTEN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 105810

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: October 16, 2018

Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Casitdel Wooten appeals the motion court's judgment dismissing his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use *115only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
**To whom it may concern**

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 **Author** Henrik Balk Director, GDS Sales Distribution QI/63, 01053 Finnair Finland Email: Henrik.balk@finnair.com Phone: +35898188225 

## Finnair comments t**o c** **onsider on Resolution 787 Summary**  New IATA resolution is an important initiatives providing following benefits to airlines, consumers, GDS and whole industry. Finnair is supporting Resolution 787 for following reasons;

 Airlines are able to bring desired product and servicesto the customers providing competitive edge against other airlines, provide more personalized offering and general content for consumers that are available today only partially in travel agency channel
. This is a result of the old technological structure used in existingtravel agency distribution.

 Consumers will benefit of more choice of options and comparability between airlines when different merchandising options are available for comparability. This will increase competition between the airlines providing more value for customers

- better pricing and options.

 GDSs will have an optional way to get the more content to the customers and possible to utilize new standard and existing travel agency structure more efficient way instead of using the old standard based technological system that has been barrier to expand service content and distribute it globally
.

 Industry is totally benefitting the new XML based standard that enables existing, new technology and travel service providers to access airline data resulting new applications and services in the market
– more choices for customers to access the content. The current GDSs distribution field is mandated with few players and distribution structure does not allow true competition between GDSs resulting slow capability to adopt airline industry requirements on the merchandising and at the same time GDSs are charging high distribution fees that are not based on true operational costs. New standard will enable more competition in a long run in distribution areathatwill benefit industry in many ways; new players, innovation, more distribution options for airlines and other travel content providers resulting opportunities to reduce distribution costs - benefitting finally end customers.
MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Steven REED, Appellant.

WD 81125

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: November 27, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 29, 2019

Robert C. Tillman, Jefferson City for respondent.

Stevn L. Reed, Appellant pro se.

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., and Victor C. Howard and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

While Appellant Steven Reed was running as a candidate for Mayor of Springfield in 2015, he filed a quarterly campaign finance report twenty-three days late. Respondent Missouri Ethics Commission assessed Reed a fee of $230.00 ($10.00 for each day the report was delinquent) pursuant *634to § 105.963.1, RSMo. The Commission then filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Cole County seeking collection of the late-filing fee. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the Commission. Reed appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Gorski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 29, 2014





By:/s/ Daniel Gorski


Daniel Gorski


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Executive Officer











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
ex10_23.htm


    Exhibit
10.23

     

    Escalade,
Incorporated

    Schedule
of Director Compensation

     

    Each
independent director of Escalade, Incorporated currently is entitled to receive
an annual cash retainer of $25,000. Each member of the Audit Committee is
entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $5,000 except for the Audit
Committee Chairman who is entitled to receive $15,000. Each member of the
Compensation Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $3,000
except for the Compensation Committee Chairman who is entitled to receive
$10,000. Members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee receive
additional fees of $1,000 per committee meeting attended in excess of six and
four meetings respectively. Mr. Robert Griffin, the Chairman of the Board, is
entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $50,000. All independent
directors and Mr. R. Griffin are entitled to receive an additional fee of $1,000
per board meeting attended in excess of eight meetings per year. In 2009, the
independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin have all volunteered to take a 10%
reduction in all fees in which they are entitled to receive. In 2009, each of
the independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin received an annual stock option
award of 5,000 shares with a one year vesting.

     

    Under the
terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007 Incentive Plan, directors can elect to
receive some or all of the fees earned in shares of the Company’s common stock
or in the form of RSU’s which vest after one year. In 2009, there were 33,195
shares issued and 54,103 RSU’s issued pursuant to the plan. In 2009, directors
Baalmann, Williams and White opted to receive 100% of the fees they were
entitled to in the form of RSU’s and stock. Director R. Griffin received a
combination of cash and stock. Directors Matthews and Savitsky received their
fees in cash.

     

    Directors
Keller and Patrick Griffin are full-time employees of the Company and receive no
board fees in connection with their service on the Company’s Board of
Directors.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to**
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. Section 1350)**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report (the "report") of Radiant Logistics,
        Inc.
        (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof,
        Bohn H.
        Crain, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        does
        hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (18
        U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:
 
 (1)
              the
                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              the
                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  /s/
        Bohn H.
        Crain
 Bohn
        H.
        Crain
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 Date:
        November 14, 2005
Subsidiaries of the Registrant(1)


                                                  State of         Percentage
                                               Incorporation       Ownership
                                               -------------       ---------

Farmers and Mechanics Bank                      United States         100%

FMS Financial Services, Inc.(2)(4)              New Jersey            100%

Land Financial Services, Inc.(2)(4)             New Jersey            100%

First Plunge, Inc. (3)(4)                       New Jersey            100%

Fishpond, Inc. (3)(4)                           New Jersey            100%

Angell Ayes, Inc. (3)(4)                        New Jersey            100%

Peter's Passion, Inc. (3)(4)                    New Jersey            100%

Atlantic Adventures, Inc.(3)(4)                 New Jersey            100%


---------------
(1)  The  operations  of the  subsidiaries  are  included  in  the  consolidated
     financial  statements  contained  in  the  Annual  Report  to  Stockholders
     attached as Exhibit 13 to the Form 10-K.
(2)  Subsidiary of Farmers and Mechanics Bank.
(3)  Subsidiary of Land Financial Services, Inc.
(4)  Currently an inactive subsidiary.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000427 26-FEB-2015 08:25 AM
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)



I, Bruce Newman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Protocall Technologies Incorporated.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer' s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer' s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer' s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer' s internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer' s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer' s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





May 16, 2008



/s/ Bruce Newman

-------------------------------

Bruce Newman

Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Tassone, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

•                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and

•                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May  13, 2005 | By:    |  /s/  James A. Tassone                 |   |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   |  James  A. Tassone, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and will beretained by Uni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report or as aseparate disclosure document.*

 

1

----
Patricia DANIELS, Respondent, v. State of Missouri, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Appellant

WD 81229 (C/w WD 81332)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: March 12, 2019

Mark A. Buchanan, for Respondent

Julie M. Blake, for Appellant

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

The Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Youth Services (the Division)

*562appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court in favor of Patricia Daniels under the Missouri Human Rights Act. It raises five points on appeal, complaining: (1) the verdict director created a roving commission; (2) Daniels did not show that her race, age, or sex was a contributing factor in employment decisions; (3) Daniels failed to present substantial evidence supporting a discrimination claim against the Division; (4) Daniels failed to show outrageous conduct that would warrant punitive damages; and (5) the punitive damages award was impermissibly excessive. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed.1 Rule 84.16(b).

1

Daniels' motion for attorneys' fees on appeal pursuant to section 213.111.2 is granted. "Although appellate courts have authority to allow and fix the amount of attorney's fees on appeal, we exercise this power with caution, believing in most cases that the trial court is better equipped to hear evidence and argument on this issue and determine the reasonableness of the fee requested." *Soto v. Costco Wholesale Corp.* , 502 S.W.3d 38, 58 (Mo. App. W.D. 2016) (internal quotation omitted). Accordingly, we remand the cause to the trial court for the purpose of conducting a hearing to determine the reasonableness of the costs and fees requested, and to enter an appropriate award. *See**id.*
#### Theodiste Cheeks *v.*State Compensation Commissioner *et al.*

(No. 8051)

Submitted September 25, 1934.

Decided October 2, 1934.

*369
      *Christie & Christie,*for relator. ■

*Homer A. Holt,*Attorney General, and *Kenneth E. Hines,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

Woods, President:

Theodiste Cheeks, who claims that he has an aggravated condition arising out of and attributable to an old injury for which he received an award of twenty per cent, now seeks, by mandamus, to compel the commissioner to grant him a hearing. While claimant admittedly had made a *prima fade*showing of a permanent total disability, the commissioner, upon the recommendation of the hospital, with which the employer has a contract, and at which claimant had received treatment, that claimant’s disability could be minimized by a major operation, refused to re-open the claim until after claimant should have submitted to such operation. Claimant interposed a timely obj ection and asked a hearing. The hearing was denied.

Where claimant has made a *prima fade*showing, he is entitled to have his claim re-opened, providing the commissioner’s jurisdiction has not ended. *Bonner*v. *Commissioner,*110 W. Va. 38, 39, 156 S. E. 847; *Mullens*v. *Commissioner,*110 W. Va. 175, 157 S. E. 170; *Martin*v. *Commissioner,*111 W. Va. 420, 162 S. E. 486.

We find nothing in the Workmen’s Compensation Act authorizing the commissioner to require an operation as a prerequisite to a re-opening of such a claim. Other than Code 1931, 23-4-7, relating to hernia, the only reference to minimization of a permanent disability is found in Code 1931, 23-4-9, which authorizes the commissioner, after the fact of disability has been determined, to make certain expenditures for medical, surgical, dental or hospital treatment, if in his opinion the per cent of disability can be reduced.

The writ will issue in accordance with the prayer of the petition.

*Writ awarded.*
# 910893 2010-1050

91 . 58 ° C 1 51 . 39 ° C

1 25 . 85 ° C

- 1 . 5 84 W / g 1 18 . 55 ° C 80 . 92 J / g 6 . 32 ° C 263 . 71 ° C 4 10 . 07 ° C 3 62 . 32 ° C 1 . 4 75 W / g

2 98 . 87 ° C 5 29 . 7 J / g 53 . 19 ° C

- 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3 4 5HeatFlow(W/g)

20 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 420 

### T em p era tur e ( ° C ) Samp le : 2 0 10 - 1 050 910 8 93 S i ze : 1 . 00 0 0 mg M e t h od : 25 - 4 20 C G l 10 C / m i n N 2 

## D SC File : 201 0 1050 . 001 O p e r ator : M . Spa c h er Run Da te : 26 - Jul - 20 1 0 14 : 59



## Total Energy (J/g) 530 Rate (W/g) 1.48 d T /dt (C/min) 106 R*E 784 Slope of Maxi m

u m P eak (W/g/C) Width at Half Height (C) DSC Cell 850 Endo Extrapolated Onset T e m

p (C) 119 Exo Onset T e m

p (C) 264 Exo Extrapolated Onset T e m

p (C) 299 Te mp at M axi mum Pea k (T mhr, C) 362 Residue Description a m ber Cell Base 2920

V alidated B y: 

## SCHERVIN Date V alidated: 

## 08/13/2010
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Leslye Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Leslye GrindleLeslye Grindle, Sr. Vice President andChief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2004