alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofUni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Reed J. Killion, Chief Executive Officer, President andPrincipal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| · |   | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| · |   | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.                  |

 
| Date:  | August 12, 2008 |   | By:                         | /s/ Reed J. Killion                                      |
|--------|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                 |   |                        | Reed J. Killion, Chief  Executive Officer, President and |
|   |                 |   | Principal Executive Officer |

 

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and will be retained by Uni-Pixel, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not bedeemed  filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

 

----
Exhibit
31.1





Section
302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





I,
Michael Cetrone, certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cetrone Energy
Company.





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances   under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations  and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I; are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure


that
material information relating to the registrant, including its


consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within


those
entities, particularly during the period in which this


report
is being prepared;





b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure


controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to


the
filing date of this report (the  "Evaluation


Date");
and





c)   presented
in this report our conclusions about the


effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on


our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of


internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's


ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data


and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material


weaknesses
in internal controls; and





b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management


or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's


internal
controls.


1





6.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in  internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.








Date:
March 31, 2009








/s/
Michael Cetrone


----------------------------------


Michael
Cetrone


Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer








2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5315 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5315

 To amend the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996 to 
 require the head of an agency to be reconfirmed by the Senate unless 
 the agency is found to be in compliance with the requirements of such 
              Act, as reported by the Comptroller General.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2006

 Mr. Cardoza introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996 to 
 require the head of an agency to be reconfirmed by the Senate unless 
 the agency is found to be in compliance with the requirements of such 
              Act, as reported by the Comptroller General.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountability in Government Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR RECONFIRMATION OF AGENCY HEAD IF AGENCY IS NOT 
              IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 
              IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1996.

    Section 803 of the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 
1996 (31 U.S.C. 3512 note) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(d) Reconfirmation of Heads of Agencies Found Noncompliant.--In 
any case in which the report of the Comptroller General submitted by 
October 1 of a year under section 804(c), beginning with October 1, 
2008, states that an agency is not in compliance with the requirements 
of subsection (a), the head of the agency may not continue to serve as 
head of the agency unless, not later than April 1 of the following 
year, the person serving in that position is reappointed by the 
President with the advise and consent of the Senate.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,534]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 10, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of ICTEL, Charleston, Illinois.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6543 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 306 

Directing the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives 

to conduct a study and issue a report about ways to increase the 

accessability of live broadcasts of floor proceedings of the House of 

Representatives to individuals without cable or satellite television, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2023 

Ms. BROWNLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of 

Representatives to conduct a study and issue a report 

about ways to increase the accessability of live broadcasts 

of floor proceedings of the House of Representatives 

to individuals without cable or satellite television, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. STUDY TO IDENTIFY OPTIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE 

3 STREAMING OF FLOOR PROCEEDINGS OF 

4 THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Chief Administrative Officer of the 

6 House of Representatives shall conduct a study on how 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 306 IH 

1 to increase the accessibility of live broadcasts of floor pro2 ceedings of the House of Representatives to individuals 

3 without cable or satellite television service, that— 

4 (1) identifies ways an individual without cable 

5 or satellite television service can watch or stream a 

6 live broadcast of floor proceedings of the House of 

7 Representatives, including— 

8 (A) a list of covered providers and which 

9 streaming platforms (if any) that the live 

10 broadcast of floor proceedings of the House of 

11 Representatives offered by each covered pro12 vider is available through; and 

13 (B) a list of covered providers with a soft14 ware application and which smart television 

15 platforms (if any) the software application is 

16 compatible with; and 

17 (2) identifies and assesses ways that a private 

18 sector entity, a public sector broadcasting service, or 

19 a partnership between public and private sector enti20 ties could create or expand broadcast services to 

21 allow more individuals to watch live floor pro22 ceedings of the House of Representatives, especially 

23 individuals who do not have cable or satellite tele24 vision service and individuals who use a smart tele25 vision. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 306 IH 

1 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after the date 

2 of the adoption of this resolution, the Chief Administrative 

3 Officer shall submit to the Committee on House Adminis4 tration of the House of Representatives, and make avail5 able to the public, a report that details the findings of 

6 the study described in subsection (a). 

7 (c) COVERED PROVIDER DEFINED.—In this section, 

8 the term ‘‘covered provider’’ means an entity that provides 

9 a live broadcast of floor proceedings of the House of Rep10 resentatives to viewers. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
From: Chuck French [French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 5:51 PM

To: Marinshaw, Richard

Cc: Hancy, Cindy Wang; Phil Mulrine

Subject: Review of impacted plants

I talked with the owner of Dover Industrial in Chicago. He said they have 7 tanks that are routed to 2

emissions stacks. They use only WAFS to control emissions. When they did the emissions performance

test some years ago they purposely did maximum load of all tanks at "full blast". Now, and for awhile,

they only use 2

- 3 tanks. He expects emissions would be significantly lower now compared to the time of

testing. They use a WAF by Hunter Chemical and he says it works great.

By the way, Dover is true ly a small business (3 employees total, including the owner).
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 13, 2002



By:

/s/    GARY L. CARANOGary L. Carano


Chief Executive Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of TierOne Corporation
(Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of my knowledge, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               September 30, 2005 (Report) fully complies with the
requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |                                      
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Date:  November 4, 2005 | By:  /s/ Eugene B. Witkowicz         
|                        | Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive Vice  
|                        | President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Sean Lightfoot, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and Brooklyn Union Gas Company et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[719 NYS2d 99]

• — In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Brooklyn Union Gas Company, New York Paving, Inc., and Hallen Construction Corp. appeal, as limited by their brief, *458from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated September 20, 1999, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiff, while operating a motorcycle behind a vehicle driven by the defendant Sharon R Cyrus (hereinafter Cyrus) and owned by the defendant Dianne R. George, was struck by the Cyrus vehicle when he attempted to pass it on the left. The plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, the appellants Brooklyn Union Gas Company, New York Paving, Inc., and Hallen Construction Corp., alleging that the Cyrus vehicle was forced to swerve to the left because of an alleged defect in the street. The plaintiff further alleged that the appellants caused or permitted the paving and repaving of the road, resulting in a defective condition. The Supreme Court denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that discovery had not been completed. We reverse.

The appellants established their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Cyrus testified at an examination before trial that she did not observe any defects in the roadway and that she moved her vehicle to the left because the road veered to the left. In opposition, the plaintiff offered only speculation as to why Cyrus moved her vehicle to the left, which was insufficient to raise a question of fact on the issue *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Moreover, the “mere hope” that evidence sufficient to defeat the motion may be uncovered in further discovery is not enough to defeat the motion *(see, Mazzaferro v Barterama Corp.,*218 AD2d 643, 644; *Jones v Gameray,*153 AD2d 550, 551). Accordingly, the the appellants’ motion should have been granted. Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Gold-stein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
(January 23, 2001)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Dones, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 101]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered July 15, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, attempted assault in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 to 12 years, 1 to 3 years, and 1 year, respectively, and judgment, same court and Justice, rendered January 9, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a concurrent term of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

With respect to defendant’s assault conviction, the court properly denied his motion to suppress identification testimony. The People clearly established that defendant and the witness who identified him as the perpetrator had a sufficient relationship prior to the incident so that suggestiveness was not a concern *(see, People v Rodriguez,*79 NY2d 445). The witness knew defendant for a period of years, saw him at least once a week, interacted socially with him, and knew him by name.

Defendant was properly convicted of attempted assault in the second degree in that the evidence warranted the conclusion that defendant used an umbrella in a manner that rendered it a dangerous instrument *(see, People v Carter,*53 NY2d 113).

The verdict of murder in the second degree was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s homicidal intent could be inferred from evidence that defendant plunged a knife deep into the victim’s chest, in the direction and close vicinity of vital organs *(see, People v Suero,*235 AD2d 357, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1101).

*367Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation during the murder trial are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged statements did not improperly inflame the emotions of the jury or deprive defendant of a fair trial. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Tom, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. D'Chaun Diablo NEBBITT, Appellant.

WD 81224

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: November 20, 2018

Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Samuel Buffaloe, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

D'Chaun Nebbitt appeals from a judgment convicting him of felony stealing. In his sole point on appeal, Nebbitt argues that the trial court abused its discretion by overruling defense counsel's request to place the "not guilty" verdict form before the "guilty" verdict form. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 07 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

____________________________

No. 06-11841

____________________________

DANIEL SIEBERT, 

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD F. ALLEN, Commissioner,

Alabama Department of Corrections, 

 Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Alabama

-------------------------------------

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R:

Based upon our review of Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion for Clarification filed

January 4, 2008, and given that jurisdiction over this case remains with the United States

Supreme Court until rehearing is resolved and their final judgment issues, we vacate this

Court’s December 21, 2007 opinion on remand from the Supreme Court of the United

States.
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1



December 14, 2007



PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL



Ms. Mariam Morris, Chief Accounting Officer

4520 East West Highway, 3rd Floor

Bethesda, Maryland 20814



     Re:     Amendment to Employment Agreement


Dear Mariam:



     This letter will reflect the agreement between you and Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) upon certain amendments to the terms of the Amended Employment Agreement between you and
the Company dated May 12, 2007.



     Effective as of January 1, 2008, your Base Salary will be increased to the annual rate of
$220,000. In addition, effective as of January 1, 2008, you ceased to serve as the Company’s Chief
Accounting Officer and assumed the position of Chief Financial Officer.



     Consistent with the requirements for modification set forth in Section 6.3 of the Amended
Employment Agreement, this letter will document the mutual agreement between you and the Company to
amend Section 3.1(a) of your Amended Employment Agreement to reflect the foregoing increase in Base
Salary. This letter further documents the mutual agreement between you and the Company to modify
your Amended Employment Agreement to reflect the foregoing change in your title and related
responsibilities as follows: (1) “Chief Accounting Officer” is changed to “Chief Financial Officer”
in Paragraph 5 of the prologue to your Amended Employment Agreement, (2) “Chief Accounting Officer”
is changed to “Chief Financial Officer” in Section 1.1 of your Amended Employment Agreement, (3)
“Chief Financial Officer” is removed from the list set forth in Section 1.1 of your Amended
Employment Agreement naming those individuals or entities who may assign you duties, and (4) “Chief
Financial Officer” is removed from the list set forth in Section 4.1(b)(vi) of your Amended
Employment Agreement naming those individuals or entities whose directives you are obliged to carry
out.



     The foregoing are the only changes to the terms of the Amended Employment Agreement to be made
at this time. Please indicate your agreement to these modifications of the Employment Agreement by
countersigning the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning the same
to me for the Company’s files.



     Thank you for your cooperation.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/  RYUJI UENO
 	 
	 	Ryuji Ueno, M.D., Ph.D 	 
	 	President 	 
	 


Acknowledged and accepted this 14th day of December, 2007.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/  MARIAM MORRIS
 	 	 
	Mariam Morris