11758 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 52 / Thursday, March 19, 2009 / Notices 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–64,614A; Hickory Springs 

Manufacturing Company, Newton, 

NC: December 5, 2007. 

TA–W–64,614B; Hickory Springs 

Manufacturing Company, Pontotoc, 

MS: December 5, 2007. 

TA–W–64,614C; Hickory Springs 

Manufacturing Company, Fort 

Smith, AR: December 5, 2007. 

TA–W–64,614D; Hickory Springs 

Manufacturing Company, Hickory 

Sewing, Hickory, NC: December 5, 

2007. 

TA–W–64,614E; Hickory Springs 

Manufacturing Company, Hickory 

Metal, Hickory, NC: December 5, 

2007. 

TA–W–64,614F; Hickory Springs 

Manufacturing Company, Corporate 

Office, Hickory, NC: December 5, 

2007. 

TA–W–64,614; Hickory Springs 

Manufacturing Company, Spring 

Plant, Hickory, NC: December 5, 

2007. 

TA–W–64,948; Raxon Fabrics 

Corporation, Allentown, PA: 

January 21, 2008. 

TA–W–64,978; Narroflex, Inc., Stuart, 

VA: January 21, 2008. 

TA–W–64,986; Dana Corporation, 

Structural Solutions Division, 

Owensboro, KY: January 15, 2008. 

TA–W–65,179; Wellington-Almont, LLC, 

Almont, MI: February 6, 2008. 

TA–W–65,215; Bennett Lumber 

Products, Inc., Princeton, ID: 

February 1, 2008. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

TA–W–64,467; Piramal Glass USA, Inc., 

Park Hills, MO. 

TA–W–65,156A; Friction, LLC, 

Crawfordsville, IN. 

TA–W–65,156; Friction, LLC, 

Greenwood, MS. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–64,307; King Controls, Electronic 

Controlled Systems, Wallace 

Technologies, Bloomington, MN. 

TA–W–64,406A; Tektronix, Performance 

Oscilloscope Production Group, 

Beaverton, OR. 

TA–W–64,406; Tektronix, Electronic 

Test and Measurement Division, 

Logic Analyzer Production Group, 

Beaverton, OR. 

TA–W–64,426; Greif Brothers 

Corporation, Greenville, OH. 

TA–W–64,580; Mohawk Industries, Inc., 

Pine Tree Plant, Dahlonega, GA. 

TA–W–64,618; Mid America Stainless, 

LLC, East St. Louis, IL. 

TA–W–64,629; International Converter, 

LLC, Belpre, OH. 

TA–W–64,679; Entertainment 

Distribution Company (USA), LLC, 

EDCI Holdings, Inc., Grover, NC. 

TA–W–64,787; J.I.T. Tool and Die, Inc., 

Brockport, PA. 

TA–W–64,817; Boise, Inc., St. Helens, 

OR. 

TA–W–64,962; FTCA, Inc., Formerly 

known as Fleetwood Folding 

Trailers, Somerset, PA. 

TA–W–65,004; Precision Mold Builders 

(PMB), Inc., Shaft Department, 

Poplar Bluff, MO. 

TA–W–65,248; Kellwood Company 

Distribution Services, Trenton, TN. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–64,885; Scholastic, Inc., Moberly, 

MO. 

TA–W–64,982; W & H Machine Shop, 

Inc., St. Marys, PA. 

TA–W–65,131; Circuit City Stores, Inc., 

Muncy, PA. 

TA–W–65,177; Data 2 Logistics, LLC, 

Grand Blanc, MI. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

TA–W–64,291; Rosti (Minden), Inc., 

Shreveport, LA. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of February 23 through February 27, 2009. 

Copies of these determinations are available 

for inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during 

normal business hours or will be mailed to 

persons who write to the above address. 

Dated: March 10, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–5899 Filed 3–18–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of March 2 through March 6, 

2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 52 / Thursday, March 19, 2009 / Notices 11759 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. a significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. the sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. a significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. there has been a shift in production 

by such workers’ firm or subdivision to 

a foreign country of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles which 

are produced by such firm or 

subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied for 

the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) A loss or business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e. , conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–64,258; Irwin Research and 

Development, Yakima, WA: October 

16, 2007 

TA–W–64,407; Northern Tool, Formerly 

known as Kneeland Industries, A 

Division of Star Cutter Co., Mio, MI: 

November 10, 2007 

TA–W–64,477; Engineered Machined 

Products, Escanaba, MI: November 

14, 2007 

TA–W–64,889; Columbia Machine, Inc., 

Vancouver, WA: January 12, 2008 

TA–W–65,015; Julie Hat Company, Inc., 

Patterson,GA: January 21, 2008 

TA–W–65,142; Nyloncraft of Michigan, 

Jonesville, MI: January 29, 2008 

TA–W–65,333; Valley Mills, Inc., Valley 

Head, AL: February 20, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,005; Seagate Technology, 

LLC, Shrewsbury, MA: July 21, 2008 

TA–W–65,098; Lineage Power 

Corporation, Mesquite, TX: 

February 2, 2008 

TA–W–65,127; MWV Calmar, Addeco, 

Washington Courthouse, OH: 

February 2, 2008 

TA–W–65,195; Cryovac, Inc., Cedar 

Rapids, IA: February 9, 2008 

TA–W–65,234; Kaz, Inc., Talent Force, 

Memphis, TN: February 11, 2009 

TA–W–65,316; Paige Electric Company, 

L.P., McConnellsburg, PA: February 

19, 2008 

TA–W–65,016; MJ Soffe, LLC, A 

Subsidiary of Delta Apparel, Inc., 

Fayetteville, NC: January 28, 2008 

TA–W–65,017; Bianchi International, 

Division of Bae Systems, Temecula, 

CA: January 7, 2008 

TA–W–65,078A; Thomas Lighting, 

Hopkinsville, KY: January 30, 2008 

TA–W–65,078; Thomas Lighting, 

Dyersburg, TN: January 30, 2008 

TA–W–64,949; Littlelfuse, Inc., 

Electronic Business Unit, Des 

Plaines, IL: January 16, 2008 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
11760 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 52 / Thursday, March 19, 2009 / Notices 

TA–W–65,217; Lumasense 

Technologies, New A.C., Inc.–dba 

Andros, Richmond, CA: February 

10, 2008 

TA–W–65,135; Leggett and Platt, Inc., 

Ennis Fabric Division, Ennis, TX: 

February 4, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–64,961; CNI–Duluth, LLC, 

Madison Heights, MI: January 15, 

2008 

TA–W–65,205; U.S. Flock Company, 

LLC, Easton, PA: February 9, 2008 

TA–W–65,235; Troxel Manufacturing, 

Tyler, TX: February 9, 2008 

TA–W–65,269; Bates Acquisition, LLC, 

Lobelville, TN: February 17, 2008 

TA–W–65,270; St. Clair Plastics 

Company, A Subsidiary of 

Consolidated Industrial Corp., 

Chesterfield Twp., MI: February 13, 

2008 

TA–W–65,323; Woodbridge Corporation, 

Brodhead, WI: February 16, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

TA–W–64,992; AK Steel Corporation, 

Butter Works Division, Butler, PA. 

TA–W–65,014; Ralphs Frame Works, 

Inc., High Point, NC. 

TA–W–65,265; Advanced Energy 

Industries, Inc.—Austin, Austin, 

TX. 

TA–W–65,407; Norton Application 

Software Services, Inc., Spencer, 

MA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–64,148; Telect, Inc., Liberty Lake, 

WA. 

TA–W–64,239; Diversified Textile 

Machinery Corporation, Kings 

Mountain, NC. 

TA–W–64,271; Knight Celotex, LLC, A 

Subsidiary of Knight Industries, 

LLC, Lisbon Falls, ME. 

TA–W–64,532; F.L. Smithe Machine 

Company, Duncansville, PA. 

TA–W–64,847; Brunswick Family Boat 

Co., Inc., dba US Marine, Plant 2, 

Trophy Sportsfishing Boats 

Division, Cumberland, MD. 

TA–W–64,906; Fabric Trends 

International, LLC, West Hartford, 

CT. 

TA–W–64,932; Pratt & Whitney, 

Maintenance Data Services and 

Equipment Group, East Hartford, 

CT. 

TA–W–64,979; Fiberweb, PLC, 

Simpsonville, SC. 

TA–W–64,994; Clear Lake Lumber, Inc., 

Spartansburg, PA. 

TA–W–65,009; Lin Creech, Sample 

Group, Inc., Thomasville, NC. 

TA–W–65,064; Cypress Semiconductor 

Corporation, Boise, ID. 

TA–W–65,115; TLD Ace, Windsor, CT. 

TA–W–65,225; Reading Truck Body, 

LLC, Reading, PA. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–64,851; Glenn Springs Holdings, 

Inc., A Subsidiary of Occidental 

Petroleum Corporation, New Castle, 

DE. 

TA–W–64,964; Kennametal, Inc., 

Farmington Hills, MI. 

TA–W–65,000; ConMed Electrosurgery, 

El Paso, TX. 

TA–W–65,146; Computer Aid, Inc., 

Allentown, PA. 

TA–W–65,174; Berry Floor, USA, 

Racine, WI. 

TA–W–65,267; Advanced Energy 

Industries, Inc., San Jose, CA. 

TA–W–65,375; WestPoint Home, Inc., 

Calhoun Falls, SC. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of March 2 through March 6, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. Department 

of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210 during normal 

business hours or will be mailed to persons 

who write to the above address. 

Dated: March 10, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–5900 Filed 3–18–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES