Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [DA 09-473]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Enforcement Bureau (the “Bureau”) gives notice of Mr. Frankie Logyang Wong's suspension from the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (or “E-Rate Program”). Additionally, the Bureau gives notice that debarment proceedings are commencing against him. Mr. Wong, or any person who has an existing contract with or intends to contract with him to provide or receive services in matters arising out of activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support, may respond by filing an opposition request, supported by documentation to Rebekah Bina, Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Investigations and Hearings Division, Room 4-C330, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

# DATES:

Opposition requests must be received by April 20, 2009. However, an opposition request by the party to be suspended must be received 30 days from the receipt of the suspension letter or April 20, 2009, whichever comes first. The Bureau will decide any opposition request for reversal or modification of suspension or debarment within 90 days of its receipt of such requests.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rebekah Bina, Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Investigations and Hearings Division, Room 4-C330, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. Rebekah Bina may be contacted by phone at (202) 418-7931 or e-mail at                         *Rebekah.Bina@fcc.gov.*                         If Ms. Bina is unavailable, you may contact Ms. Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone at (202) 418-1420 and by e-mail at                         *Vickie.Robinson@fcc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Bureau has suspension and debarment authority pursuant to 47 CFR 54.8 and 47 CFR 0.111(a)(14). Suspension will help to ensure that the party to be suspended cannot continue to benefit from the schools and libraries mechanism pending resolution of the debarment process. Attached is the suspension letter, DA 09-473, which was mailed to Mr. Wong and released on February 26, 2009. The complete text of the notice of suspension and initiation of debarment proceedings is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portal II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, the complete text is available on the FCC's Web site at                     *http://www.fcc.gov.*                     The text may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating inspection and copying during regular business hours at the contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portal II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B420, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, facsimile (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail                     *http://www.bcpiweb.com.*

Federal Communications Commission.

Hillary S. DeNigro,

Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau.

The suspension letter follows:

February 26, 2009.

## DA 09-473

## VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

## RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FACSIMILE (510-452-8405)

Mr. Frankie Logyang Wong 

c/o David Gerger 

1001 Fannin, Suite 1950

Houston, TX 77002

#### Re: Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings,  File No. EB-08-IH-5313

Dear Mr. Wong:

                    The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) has received notice of your conviction of federal crimes, including conspiracy to commit bribery, conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, and multiple counts of bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds, in connection with your participation in the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (“E-Rate program”).[1]                                          Consequently, pursuant to 47 CFR 54.8, this letter constitutes official notice of your suspension from the E-Rate program. In addition, the Enforcement Bureau (“Bureau”) hereby notifies you that we are commencing debarment proceedings against you.[2] 
      ( print page 11729)    

## I. Notice of Suspension

                    The Commission has established procedures to prevent persons who have “defrauded the government or engaged in similar acts through activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism” from receiving the benefits associated with that program.[3]                                          On November 13, 2008, the United States District Court in Texas sentenced you to serve ten years in prison following your conviction of federal crimes, including conspiracy to commit bribery, conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, and multiple counts of bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds, in connection with your participation the E-Rate program.[4]                                          In addition, you and a co-conspirator were ordered to forfeit approximately $1 million as a result of your conviction.[5] 

                    As the co-owner and president of Micro Systems Engineering, Inc., (“MSE”), you participated in a bribery and money laundering scheme involving technology projects for the Dallas Independent School District (“DISD”), including a contract that involved E-Rate funds for Funding Year 2002 (“E-Rate FY 2002 Contract”).[6]                                          Beginning in November 2002, MSE and other companies formed a consortium (“Consortium”) for the purpose of submitting a bid proposal relating to E-Rate services for the DISD. While your co-defendant Ruben B. Bohuchot (“Mr. Bohuchot”) was Chief Technology Officer of the Dallas Independent School District,[7]                                          the Consortium submitted a bid proposal for E-Rate services after Mr. Bohuchot adjusted the requirements of DISD's request for proposals to benefit you and your companies. Ultimately, the Consortium's bid was approved by DISD.[8]                                          During the same time period, you and MSE provided things of value to Mr. Bohuchot, including extensive access to and control of large sports-fishing vessels, payment for numerous vacations and various entertainment services and cash.[9]                                          A federal jury ultimately determined that you and Mr. Bohuchot engaged in a conspiracy to commit bribery and money laundering. As a result of your criminal activity, MSE received at least $35 million in aggregate revenue from DISD and the Universal Service Administrative Company as a result of its participation in the DISD E-Rate FY 2002 Contract.[10] 

                    Pursuant to section 54.8(a)(4) of the Commission's rules,[11]                                          your conviction requires the Bureau to suspend you from participating in any activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries fund mechanism, including the receipt of funds or discounted services through the schools and libraries fund mechanism, or consulting with, assisting, or advising applicants or service providers regarding the schools and libraries support mechanism.[12]                                          Your suspension becomes effective upon the earlier of your receipt of this letter or publication of notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .[13] 

                    Suspension is immediate pending the Bureau's final debarment determination. In accordance with the Commission's debarment rules, you may contest this suspension or the scope of this suspension by filing arguments in opposition to the suspension, with any relevant documentation. Your request must be received within 30 days after you receive this letter or after notice is published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , whichever comes first.[14]                                          Such requests, however, will not ordinarily be granted.[15]                                          The Bureau may reverse or limit the scope of suspension only upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances.[16]                                          Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Bureau will decide any request for reversal or modification of suspension within 90 days of its receipt of such request.[17] 

## II. Initiation of Debarment Proceedings

                    Your conviction of criminal conduct in connection with the E-Rate program, in addition to serving as a basis for immediate suspension from the program, also serves as a basis for the initiation of debarment proceedings against you. Your conviction falls within the categories of causes for debarment defined in section 54.8(c) of the Commission's rules.[18]                                          Therefore, pursuant to section 54.8(a)(4) of the Commission's rules, your conviction requires the Bureau to commence debarment proceedings against you.                

                    As with your suspension, you may contest debarment or the scope of the proposed debarment by filing arguments and any relevant documentation within 30 calendar days of the earlier of the receipt of this letter or of publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .[19]                                          Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Bureau will debar you.[20]                                          Within 90 days of receipt of any opposition to your suspension and proposed debarment, the Bureau, in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, will provide you with notice of its decision                           ( print page 11730)                        to debar.[21]                                          If the Bureau decides to debar you, its decision will become effective upon the earlier of your receipt of a debarment notice or publication of the decision in the                     **Federal Register**                    .[22] 

                    If and when your debarment becomes effective, you will be prohibited from participating in activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism for at least three years from the date of debarment.[23]                                          The Bureau may, if necessary to protect the public interest, extend the debarment period.[24] 

                    Please direct any response, if by messenger or hand delivery, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 236 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002, to the attention of Rebekah Bina, Attorney Advisor, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Room 4-C330, with a copy to Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Room 4-C330, Federal Communications Commission. If sent by commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail), the response should be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, Maryland 20743. If sent by first-class, Express, or Priority mail, the response should be sent to Rebekah Bina, Attorney Advisor, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 4-C330, Washington, DC 20554, with a copy to Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 4-C330, Washington, DC 20554. You shall also transmit a copy of the response via e-mail to                     *Rebekah.Bina@fcc.gov*                     and to                     *Vickie.Robinson@fcc.gov.*

                    If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Bina via mail, by telephone at (202) 418-7931 or by e-mail at                     *Rebekah.Bina@fcc.gov.*                     If Ms. Bina is unavailable, you may contact Ms. Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone at (202) 418-1420 and by e-mail at                     *Vickie.Robinson@fcc.gov.*

Sincerely yours,

Hillary S. DeNigro,

Chief  Investigations and Hearings Division Enforcement Bureau

CC: Kristy Carroll, Esq., Universal Service Administrative Company (via e-mail), Dayle A. Elieson, U.S. Attorney's Office, United States Department of Justice (via mail)

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *See*18 U.S.C. 371 (conspiracy to bribery involving federal programs), 666(a) (bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds and aiding and abetting), and 1956(h) (conspiracy to lauder monetary instruments). Any further reference in this letter to “your conviction” refers to your ten count conviction.                         *United States*                         v.                         *Frankie Logyang Wong,*                         Criminal Docket No. 3:07-CR-00167-L-2, Judgment (N.D. Tex. filed Nov. 14, 2008 and entered Nov. 17, 2008) (“                        *Frankie Wong Judgment*                        ”).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             47 CFR 54.8; 47 CFR 0.111 (delegating to the Enforcement Bureau authority to resolve universal service suspension and debarment proceedings). The Commission adopted debarment rules for the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism in 2003.                         *See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism,*                         Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202 (2003) (“                        *Second Report and Order*                        ”) (adopting section 54.521 to suspend and debar parties from the E-rate program). In 2007, the Commission extended the debarment rules to apply to all of the Federal universal service support mechanisms.                         *Comprehensive Review of the Universal Service Fund Management, Administration, and Oversight; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Schools and Libraries                                                         Universal Service Support Mechanism; Lifeline and Link Up; Changes to the Board of Directors for the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.,*                         Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 16372, 16410-12 (2007) (                        *Program Management Order*) (renumbering section 54.521 of the universal service debarment rules as section 54.8 and amending subsections (a)(1), (5), (c), (d), (e)(2)(i), (3), (e)(4), and (g)).                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See Second Report and Order,*                         18 FCC Rcd at 9225, ¶ 66;                         *Program Management Order,*                         22 FCC Rcd at 16387, ¶ 32. The Commission's debarment rules define a “person” as “[a]ny individual, group of individuals, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government or legal entity, however, organized.” 47 CFR § 54.8(a)(6).                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                                                     *See supra*                         note 1.                         *See also http://dallas.fbi.gov/​dojpressrel/​pressrel08/​dl111308.htm*                         (accessed Dec. 8, 2008) (“                        *DOJ November 13, 2008 Frankie Wong Press Release*                        ”);                         *Frankie Wong Judgment*                         at 1-2.                    
        Back to Citation      

5.                                                     *See DOJ November 13, 2008 Frankie Wong Press Release; Frankie Wong Judgment*                         at 2 and 8.                    
        Back to Citation      

6.                                                     *See United States*                         v.                         *Ruben B. Bohuchot, et al.*,  Criminal Docket No. 3:07-CR-167-L-1, Indictment at 1,5-6,15 (N.D.Tex. filed May 22, 2007, and entered May 24, 2007, under seal; unsealed May 29, 2007). (“                        *DISD Indictment*                        ”); MSE was a computer reseller firm providing computer products and services to large corporations and school districts, principally in the state of Texas.                         *See DISD Indictment*                         at 2;                         *DOJ November 13, 2008 Frankie Wong Press Release*                         at 1.                    
        Back to Citation      

7.                             In a separate letter, we also serve notice of suspension and initiation of debarment proceedings to Ruben B. Bohuchot for his role in the DISD bribery and money laundering scheme, pursuant to his conviction.                         *See*                         Letter from Hillary S. DeNigro, Chief Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Ruben B. Bohuchot, Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings, DA 09-471 (Inv. & Hearings Div., Enf. Bur. Feb. 26, 2009).                    
        Back to Citation      

8.                                                     *See DISD Indictment*                         at 5-6;                         *DOJ November 13, 2008 Frankie Wong Press Release.*                         MSE was able to obtain two contracts with DISD as a result of information that Mr. Wong received from Mr. Bohuchot.                         *DISD Indictment*                         at 2-6. In this proceeding, we only address the contract involving E-Rate services.                    
        Back to Citation      

9.                                                     *DISD Indictment*                         at 4-5, 7-21;                         *DOJ November 13, 2008 Frankie Wong Press Release.*
        Back to Citation      

10.                                                     *DISD Indictment*                         at 6. Based on a winning bid proposal prepared utilizing information that Mr. Wong received from Mr. Bohuchot, MSE received at least $4 million as a subcontractor under another contract with DISD.                         *See DISD Indictment*                         at 4;                         *DOJ November 13, 2008 Frankie Wong Press Release*                         at 2.                    
        Back to Citation      

11.                             47 CFR 54.8(a)(4).                         *See Second Report and Order,*                         18 FCC Rcd at 9225-9227, ¶¶ 67-74.                    
        Back to Citation      

12.                             47 CFR 54.8(a)(1), (d).                    
        Back to Citation      

13.                                                     *Second Report and Order,*                         18 FCC Rcd at 9226, ¶ 69; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

14.                             47 CFR 54.8(e)(4).                    
        Back to Citation      

15.                                                     *Id.*
        Back to Citation      

16.                             47 CFR 54.8(e)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

17.                                                     *See Second Report and Order,*                         18 FCC Rcd at 9226, ¶ 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5), 54.8(f).                    
        Back to Citation      

18.                             “Causes for suspension and debarment are the conviction of or civil judgment for attempt or commission of criminal fraud, theft, embezzlement, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, receiving stolen property, making false claims, obstruction of justice and other fraud or criminal offense arising out of activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism, the high-cost support mechanism, the rural healthcare support mechanism, and the low-income support mechanism.” 47 CFR 54.8(c). Such activities “include the receipt of funds or discounted services through [the Federal universal service] support mechanisms, or consulting with, assisting, or advising applicants or service providers regarding [the Federal universal service] support mechanisms.” 47 CFR 54.8(a)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

19.                                                     *See Second Report and Order,*                         18 FCC Rcd at 9226, ¶ 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(3).                    
        Back to Citation      

20.                                                     *Second Report and Order,*                         18 FCC Rcd at 9227, ¶ 74.                    
        Back to Citation      

21.                                                     *See id.,*                         18 FCC Rcd at 9226, ¶ 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

22.                             47 CFR 54.8(e)(5). The Commission may reverse a debarment, or may limit the scope or period of debarment upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances, following the filing of a petition by you or an interested party or upon motion by the Commission. 47 CFR 54.8(f).                    
        Back to Citation      

23.                                                     *Second Report and Order,*                         18 FCC Rcd at 9225, ¶ 67; 47 CFR 54.8(d), 54.8(g).                    
        Back to Citation      

24.                             47 CFR 54.8(g).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E9-6020 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P