alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel Wayne TEARE, Appellant.

WD 80995

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: November 27, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 29, 2019 Application for Transfer Denied April 2, 2019

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Clark L. Jones, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, Presiding Judge, and Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Daniel Teare appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Boone County, Missouri, following a jury trial in which he was found guilty of two counts of promoting child pornography and ten counts of possessing child pornography and sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law *452has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 409 

Condemning the acts of terrorism committed by Iranian military proxies, 

including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, against 

the people of the State of Israel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2023 

Mr. GIMENEZ (for himself, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Ms. MACE, Mr. BOST, Mr. NUNN of Iowa, Ms. SALAZAR, Mr. BABIN, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Mr. 

RESCHENTHALER, and Mr. GUEST) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the acts of terrorism committed by Iranian military proxies, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, against the people of the State 

of Israel. 

Whereas the democratic, Jewish State of Israel is a key ally 

and a strategic partner of the United States; 

Whereas it remains a standing policy of the United States to 

support Israel’s security efforts; 

Whereas American policy has long sought to bring peace to 

the Middle East and recognize that both the Israeli and 

Palestinian people should be able to live in safe and sovVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:10 May 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR409.IH HR409

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 409 IH 

ereign states, free from fear and violence, with mutual 

recognition; and 

Whereas Hamas began launching rockets into the Israeli capital of Jerusalem and surrounding areas belonging to the 

Jewish people of Israel: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the acts of terrorism committed 

3 by Iranian military proxies, including Hamas, 

4 Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, 

5 against the people of the State of Israel; 

6 (2) recognizes Jerusalem as the legitimate cap7 ital city of the State of Israel; 

8 (3) supports Israel’s efforts of self-determina9 tion and collective security against external forces; 

10 and 

11 (4) reaffirms support for policies and initiatives 

12 combatting anti-Semitic behavior around the world. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
exv10w32









Exhibit 10.32




Amendment to Employment Agreement



This Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 1st day of September, 2009
(the “Effective Date”)by and between SXC Health Solutions, Inc, a subsidiary of SXC Health
Solutions Corp. (collectively, the “Company”), and Greg Buscetto (“Employee”), as an amendment to
the Employment Agreement between the Company and Employee dated as of November 6, 2008. Except as
specified below, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in force.



1. Section 1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the paragraph in its entirety and
inserting the following paragraph in its place



Duties. The Employee shall be the Company’s Executive Vice President and General Manager,
InformedRx. Employee shall be responsible for oversight and profitability of the InformedRx
business and will perform other duties as assigned. Employee shall report to the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and President. Although Employee will not be required to relocate his principal
residence from Dacula, Georgia to the Lisle, IL area until August 31, 2010, Employee shall perform
his duties under this Agreement at the Company’s facilities in Lisle, Illinois or at any subsequent
location of the Company’s primary administrative operations.



2. Section 3.3 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the paragraph in its entirety and
inserting the following paragraph in its place:



3.3 Expenses. During the Employment Period, Employee shall be entitled to reimbursement of
all business expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of Employee’s duties for the Company,
including reasonable travel-related expenses (other then stated below with respect to specific
reimbursement guidelines when in Lisle, IL), upon submission of all receipts and accounts with
respect thereto, and approval by the Company thereof, in accordance with the then current business
expense reimbursement policies of the Company.



Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary herein, expenses incurred while in Lisle, IL will be
handled as follows:





	 	§	 	On and after September 1, 2009, the company will not reimburse Employee for
rental car or personal meals while employee is working in the Lisle office.
	 
	 	§	 	On and after September 1, 2009, Employee will be required to contribute $15,000
towards hotel expenses while working in the Lisle office. This will be taken
through a miscellaneous payroll deduction of $625 per paycheck starting September
11, 2009 and continuing for 24 pay-periods through July 2010.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized
representative and Employee has signed this Amendment as of the day and year first above
written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SXC HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.	 	 	 	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/ Jeff Park	 	 	 	/s/ B. Greg Buscetto	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	Name:

	 	Jeff Park	 	 	 	Greg Buscetto	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	Executive Vice President and
	 	 
	Title:
	 	CFO	 	 	 	General Manager, InformedRx
EXHIBIT 31.2 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

  I, J. Roe Buckley certify that: 

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:                November 15, 2010
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Muscato Group,
Inc., for the period ending December 31, 2009, I, Michael A. Muscato, Chief
Executive Officer of Muscato Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Muscato Group, Inc.




Muscato
      Group, Inc.Date: March
      31 , 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Michael A. MuscatoMichael
      A. MuscatoChief
      Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lu Feng, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that the annual report on Form 10-K/A of China Chemical Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Chemical Corp.





Dated: May 23, 2011
By:
/s/ Lu FengLu FengChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

ALJYROSS SMITH

NO. 2023 KW 1131

FEBRUARY 16, 2024

In Re: Aljyross Smith, applying for supervisory writs, 17th

Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafourche, No. 

600662. 

BEFORE: WELCH, WOLFE, AND STROMBERG, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. The records of the Lafourche Parish

Clerk of Court reflect that relator has pled guilty and has been

sentenced in this felony case.
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dean Huge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that the annual report on Form 10-K/A of China Chemical Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Chemical Corp.





Dated: May 23, 2011
By:
/s Dean HugeDean HugeChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Tassone, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

·              The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and

·              The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August 14,  2009 | By:   | /s/ James A. Tassone                       |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                   |            | James A. Tassone, Chief  Financial Officer |

 

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and will be retained by Uni-Pixel, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not bedeemed  filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6386]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and 
Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, May 7, 2009, Friday, May 8, 
2009, and Saturday, May 9, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, May 7, 2009 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., Friday, May 8, 2009 from 8 
a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturday, May 9, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. 
Central Time in Dallas, TX. The public is invited to make oral comments 
or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent 
to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. For more information 
please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP 
Office, Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-
2221 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 17, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-6386 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Koncepts Communications of L.I. Corp., Respondent, v Merchants Insurance Company of New Hampshire, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 673]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated March 30, 2000, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff’s property was damaged when water entered its basement during a heavy rainstorm. The plaintiff was insured under a policy issued by the defendant, which excluded losses “caused directly or indirectly by * * * any earth movement *(other than sinkhole*collapse) such as * **** earth sinking, rising or shifting” (emphasis supplied). After an investigation, the defendant concluded, *inter alia,*that the plaintiff’s loss was excluded under the insurance policy because the flooding was *556caused by a broken drainage pipe which had ruptured as a result of “earth movement.”

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendant “neither established * * * how the water came to be discharged into the basement rather than being transported through it, nor in what respect the exclusionary clause of the policy would pertain.” Additionally, we note that the affidavit submitted by the defendant’s own expert raises a question of fact as to whether the rupture of the pipe may be have been caused by a sinkhole, a condition which the policy specifically excludes from the definition of earth movement. Accordingly, the defendant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and its motion for summary judgment was properly denied *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
#### Claudio D. Marinesco, Respondent, v Misty J. Beckenbach, Appellant.

[771 NYS2d 887]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York *105County (Joan Madden, J.), entered July 11, 2003, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to the extent of granting him summary judgment upon his first cause of action for partition and sale of the parties’ cooperative apartment, and denied defendant’s cross motion for a default judgment upon her counterclaims, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the underlying decision, same court and Justice, dated March 18, 2003, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Summary judgment upon plaintiffs cause for partition and sale of the subject cooperative apartment was properly granted. Although defendant maintains that plaintiffs right as co-owner of the apartment to seek its partition and sale *(see*RPAPL 901 [1]; *Chiang v Chiang,*137 AD2d 371 [1988]) was limited by the parties’ agreement, which she contends permits her to remain in the apartment so long as she pays the carrying costs, the agreement cannot be so construed. Indeed, the agreement expressly recognizes that the apartment was purchased by the parties as an investment and specifically contemplates and provides for its eventual sale. Thus, while it permits defendant to reside there on certain conditions, it does so only “until the sale of the apartment” and contains no provision restricting plaintiffs prerogative as a co-owner to seek such a sale.

Defendant’s cross motion for a default judgment upon her counterclaims was properly denied. Plaintiff presented a reasonable excuse for his failure to timely reply to the counterclaims and defendant was not prejudiced by the relatively short delay involved. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0895. WALTER LAWRENCE KENNEY v. THE STATE.

In 2018, a jury convicted Walter Lawrence Kenney, who represented himself

at trial, of aggravated child molestation, rape, incest, and multiple counts of child

molestation. After the trial court entered an order denying his motion for new trial on

September 11, 2020, Kenney filed his pro se notice of appeal on December 16, 2020.

We, however, lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal is untimely.

Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-38 (a), a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days

of entry of the order on appeal. The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is

an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Couch v. United

Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721, 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). Here,

Kenney filed his notice of appeal 96 days after entry of the order.1 His appeal is

therefore untimely, and it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1

It appears that Kenney filed a pro se motion for an out-of-time appeal on

December 4, 2020. That motion, along with other pro se motions, was denied by the

trial court on December 18, 2020.

January 28, 2021

01/28/2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7815
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALONZO DANTZLER, JR., a/k/a Chillibud, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-95-489) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alonzo Dantzler, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Alonzo Dantzler, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for downward departure of his sentence on the basis of his post-conviction rehabilitation. We have reviewed the recordand the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Dantzler , No. CR-95-489 (D.S.C. Nov. 30, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED