alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Allen R. Hartman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hartman Short Term Income Properties XX, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Allen R. HartmanAllen R. HartmanChairman and Chief Executive Officer





Date:  March 31, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

I, K. Timothy O’Brien, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc.;  and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April 26, 2013



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ K. Timothy O’Brien          
|K. Timothy O’Brien              
|Co-Chief Executive Officer      
|(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  November 18, 2005

 

/s/ Barry Lamperd

Barry Lamperd

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5620 

To extend the patent term for the badge of the Sons of the American 

Legion, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2006 

Mr. CANNON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend the patent term for the badge of the Sons of 

the American Legion, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PATENT TERM EXTENSION FOR THE BADGE OF 

4 THE SONS OF THE AMERICAN LEGION. 

5 The term of a certain design patent numbered 92,187 

6 (for the badge of the Sons of the American Legion) is re7 newed and extended for a period of 14 years beginning 

8 on the date of enactment of this Act, with all the rights 

9 and privileges pertaining to such patent. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Perez, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 38]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J., at hearing; Jeffrey Atlas, J., at plea and sentence), rendered August 31, 1998, *286convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of *4*years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The veteran detective, who had extensive training in narcotics interdiction *(see, People v Valentine, 17*NY2d 128, 132), had an objective credible reason to approach and request information from defendant at the Port Authority Bus Terminal after defendant arrived at the last minute for a bus that was destined for a city known to be a destination for drug deliveries, carrying a plastic bag through which the outline of a shoebox was visible *(see, People v Hollman,*79 NY2d 181, 193; *People v Wellington,*265 AD2d 213, *lv denied*94 NY2d 886; *People v Gabriel,*264 AD2d 641, *lv denied*94 NY2d 823; *cf., People v Fields,*257 AD2d 387). The detective testified that drug couriers often board buses "at the last minute in order to minimize contact with the police and often use shoeboxes to carry drugs. We note that the record fails to support defendant’s claim that defendant’s late arrival for a bus was the only basis for this Level I inquiry cited by the detective in his testimony or by the court in its findings. The detective’s inquiry of defendant, after first informing him that he did not have to speak to him and leaving the aisle free for him to leave, was neither accusatory nor intimidating. Once defendant denied having any luggage, which was contrary to the detective’s observations, the detective had a founded suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, permitting further inquiry. Since defendant’s denial of ownership constituted an abandonment, the detective properly searched the bag and recovered drugs. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,206] 

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Millinocket Fabrication and Machine Inc., Millinocket, Maine. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6297 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Opinion filed June 13, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-13-00030-CR

__________

DAVID LONGORIA GONZALES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 266th District Court 

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR13797

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The jury convicted David Longoria Gonzales of the first-degree felony of 

possession of a controlled substance. The jury assessed his punishment at 

confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice for a term of seventy years and imposed a fine of $10,000. We dismiss the 

appeal.
2

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw in this 

appeal. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and 

conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that he has 

concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided Appellant with a 

copy of the brief and advised Appellant of his right to review the record and file a 

response to counsel’s brief. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. 

State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.—

Eastland 2005, no pet.).

Appellant has filed a pro se response to counsel’s motion to withdraw and 

supporting brief. In addressing an Anders brief and pro se response, a court of 

appeals may only determine (1) that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an 

opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error or 

(2) that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so 

that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues. Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403;

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Following the 

procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the 

record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit and should be dismissed. 

Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409.

We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise Appellant that he may 

file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals seeking review by that court. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4 (“In criminal 

cases, the attorney representing the defendant on appeal shall, within five days 

after the opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and 
3

judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file a pro se petition 

for discretionary review under Rule 68.”). Likewise, this court advises Appellant 

that he may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 68.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

June 13, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 313 

Commending and congratulating the Quinnipiac University men’s hockey team 

for winning the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division 

I Men’s Hockey National Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2023 

Ms. DELAURO (for herself, Mr. COURTNEY, Mrs. HAYES, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, and Mr. HIMES) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Commending and congratulating the Quinnipiac University 

men’s hockey team for winning the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Men’s Hockey National Championship. 

Whereas, on Saturday, April 8, 2023, the Quinnipiac University men’s hockey team (referred to in this preamble as 

the ‘‘Quinnipiac Bobcats’’) won the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as 

‘‘NCAA’’) Men’s Hockey Championship with a 3–2 win 

over the Minnesota Golden Gophers, at Amalie Arena in 

Tampa, Florida; 

Whereas the 2023 national championship is the first national 

championship for the Quinnipiac Bobcats; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 313 IH 

Whereas the Quinnipiac Bobcats have made the NCAA 

Championship tournament in 8 of the last 10 seasons; 

Whereas Jacob Quillan was named the Most Outstanding 

Player of the 2023 NCAA Championship tournament, 

finishing the NCAA Championship tournament with 5 

goals and setting a new Quinnipiac University record for 

most goals scored in a single tournament; 

Whereas Rand Pecknold, the head coach of the Quinnipiac 

Bobcats, has led the team for 29 years and transformed 

the Quinnipiac Bobcats from a Division II program to a 

Division I powerhouse; and 

Whereas the National Championship was played in front of 

20,000 people in Tampa, Florida, and was the most 

watched ‘‘Frozen Four Final’’ game in more than 10 

years: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the Quinnipiac University men’s 

3 hockey team for winning the 2023 National Colle4 giate Athletic Association Division I Men’s Hockey 

5 Championship; 

6 (2) congratulates the fans, students, and fac7 ulty of Quinnipiac University; and 

8 (3) respectfully requests that the Clerk of the 

9 House of Representatives transmit an enrolled copy 

10 of this resolution to— 

11 (A) the President of Quinnipiac University, 

12 Dr. Judy Olian; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 313 IH 

1 (B) the head coach of the Quinnipiac Uni2 versity men’s hockey team, Rand Pecknold. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
August 8, 2016

Mr. Randolph Adams Skyshots LLC
228 W 38 Street
Savannah

, GA 31401

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 4909

Dear Mr. Adams :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sidney Padgett, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 860]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered March 16, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.8
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND
RESTATED LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT Fourth Amendment
 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Lender
  BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC Borrower
 RECITALS :
 Loan Agreement
   1. Definitions
 2. Amendments To Loan Agreement
 2.1 Applicable Margin




---



##### 



LEVEL
    
    BORROWING BASE TEST
    
    LIBOR MARGIN
    
    BASE MARGINI
    
    Availability is greater than or equal to 24% of Borrowing Base
    
    3.50%
    
    3.00%II
    
    Availability is greater than or equal to 12% of Borrowing Base
but less than 24% of Borrowing
Base
    
    3.75%
    
    3.25%III
    
    Availability is less than 12% of Borrowing Base
    
    4.00%
    
    3.50%
 2.2
 3. Consent to PEMG Amendment PEMG Amendment
 4. Additional Acknowledgments And Representations
 5. Ratification Of Loan Documents; No Claims Against Lender . WAIVES RELEASES
 6. Conditions To Effectiveness
 6.1
 2




---



##### 



6.2
 6.3
 6.4
 6.5
 6.6
 7.
 7.1
 7.2
 7.3
 7.4
 7.5 THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED, GOVERNED, AND ENFORCED PURSUANT TO THE INTERNAL
LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND SHALL TAKE EFFECT AS SEALED INSTRUMENT.
 SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW
 3




---



##### 



BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC.,as BorrowerBy
    
    /s/ Peter EdisonName
    
    Peter EdisonTitle
    
    CEOBANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as LenderBy
    
    /s/ Richard D. Hill, Jr.Name
    
    Richard D. Hill, Jr.Title
    
    Managing Director
 S/1




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 PEMG Amendment
  S/1




---



##### 



AMENDMENT NUMBER 3 TO LOAN DOCUMENTS
 THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER 3 TO LOAN DOCUMENTS Third Amendment GVECR II 2007 E Trust dated December 17, 2007 Lender PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. Agent Security holder BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC. Borrower
 W I T N E S S E T H
 Credit Agreement
 First Amendment
 Second Amendment
  DEFINITIONS .
 AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
 Section 6.16(b)
 Financial Covenants
 Minimum EBITDA.
 Applicable MinimumApplicable Period
    
    AmountsFebruary 1, 2009 to May 2, 2009
    
    $
    200,000February 1, 2009 to August 1, 2009
    
    $
    1,000,000
 1




---



##### 



Applicable MinimumApplicable Period
    
    AmountsFebruary 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009
    
    $
    (4,100,000
    )February 1, 2009 to January 30, 2010
    
    $
    5,250,000January 31, 2010 to May 1, 2010
    
    $
    500,000January 31, 2010 to July 31, 2010
    
    $
    1,250,000January 31, 2010 to October 31, 2010
    
    $
    (4,100,000
    )November 1, 2010 to January 30, 2011
    
    $
    5,250,000
  CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THIS THIRD AMENDMENT .
        CONSTRUCTION .
 2




---



##### 



ENTIRE AMENDMENT; EFFECT OF THIRD AMENDMENT .
 COUNTERPARTS; TELEFACSIMILE EXECUTION .
 MISCELLANEOUS
 this Agreement, hereunder, herein, hereof
 Credit Agreement, thereunder, therein, thereof
  3




---



##### 



BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC.By:Title:PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., as Agent and as Security holderBy:Title:By:Title:GVECR II 2007 E Trust dated December 17, 2007, as LenderBy:Title:
 4
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of UHF Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald C. Schmeiser,
as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of UHF
Incorporated, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.








Date:
      October 24, 2008
            By:
      /s/ Ronald C.
    SchmeiserRonald
      C. SchmeiserPresident,
      Chief ExecutiveOfficer
      and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:                 May 16, 2011



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant