### BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WASHINGTON, DOC.

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic

Conferences of the International Air Transport Association Docket OST

- 201 3

-

APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING

AND APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BY THE

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION

1 7 December 201 3

Communications with respect to

this document should be sent to:

Douglas Lavin Regional Vice President – North America International Air Transport Association
1201 F Street, NW, Suite 650 Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 628 -929213455799.1



### Summary DOCKET: OST-2013 DOT ORDER: pending

Date: 17 December 201 3
Filing fee/IATA Acct: $6 1

– CAR003CH01

US/UST involved?: yes
Intended effective date: 18 February 201 4
Meeting date/time: CSC Mail Vote (S076) dated 23 August 2013
Agreement/Minutes: Recommended Practice 1630, Finally Adopted Resolution dated 17

De cember 2013

APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING AND APPROVAL

(TIER 2 AGREEMENT FILING)

Pursuant to statements submitted by Member airlines of the International Air Transport

Association (IATA), the undersigned has been constituted to be their attorney- in -fact for filing with

the Department of Transportation copies of agreements adopted by the IATA Traffic Conferences.

On their behalf, and pursuant to the procedures specified in Order 2012-4-18

(13 April 2012), I am filing with the Department this application, the subject agreement and

supporting documentation. This agreement is a Tier 2 agreement, as specified in Appendix B to

Order 2012-4-18 . The intended effective date of the agreement is 18 February 201 4

.

The subject agreement amends or establishes Resolutions and/or Recommended Practices

that are amongst subject areas which the Department has indicated it still chooses to review on a

case-by case basis.

The present Application requests an exemption from Condition #2 to the Department’s

approval of the Provisions for the Conduct of the IATA Traffic Conferences, which condition

requires that an agreement be filed for review and appropriate action by the Department prior to

an agreement’s being implemented.13455799.1



### The text of the agreement and other conference documentation sent to airline Members of

IATA accompany this Notice. There is also a summary document that explains the amendment

or agreement regarding its nature and purpose.

In that context, granting the requested exemption would serve the public interest, and,

thus, meets the 49 USC §40109(c) standards for exemption from filing and approval

requirements.

Respectfully submitted:

_________________________________ Douglas Lavin Regional Vice President – North America International Air Transport Association
Attorney- in -fact13455799.1 

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of this application has been served this day by first class or priority mail on the

following persons:

Chief, Transportation, Energy & Agriculture Section

Antitrust Division Department of Justice Washington, DC 20530

A copy of this application has been sent this day by email to John Kiser (JohnKiser@dot.gov) and to Della Davis (Della.Davis@dot.gov) of the Department of Transportation.

/s/ Douglas Lavin Douglas Lavin

Date Served

17 December 2013

## INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION



# FINALLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION

CARGO SERVICES CONFERENCE (CSC)

### M E M O R AN D U M

CSC/FAR/003/2013

TO: All Members of IATA

Cargo Services Conference Accredited Representatives

CC: Members, Cargo Procedures Conferences Management Group

Members, IATA/FIATA Consultative Council IATA Regional Cargo Managers IATA Strategic Partners

FROM: Secretary, Cargo Services Conference

DATE: 17 December 201 3

SUBJECT: FINALLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION

– RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 1630

Please find attached the amendment to Recommended Practice 1630 (RP1630 ) adopted through CSC Mail Vote (S076) for normal effectiveness.

The filing period runs from 17 December 201 3 to 17 February 201 4, with an intended effective date of 18 February 201 4. The final effectiveness date will be communicated to Members by a Declaration of Effectiveness Memorandum as soon as all required government approvals have

been obtained.

Members are requested to file the amendment with their government authorities where required, and to advise IATA Secretariat of their g overnments’ action latest by 17 February 2014 , the end of the filing period. As usual, filing formalities with the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Canadian Transportation Agency will be handled by IATA.

Please note that the revised RP1630 will be declared effective upon receipt of the necessary government approvals, in accordance with Resolutions 001 and 006.

Andrea Gruber Manager Business Process & Standards, IATA

Attachment FINALLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION SUMMARY

The following amendment to RP163 0 is requested for approval. The intended effective date is 18 February 2014

.

Resolution Summary of Amendment

RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 16 3 0

CARGO SECURITY

(Amending) Amendment t o align with the latest version

of the Consignment Security Declaration in the ICAO Aviation Security Manual

, includ ing the latest layout of the Consignment Security Declaration a nd the accompanying completion guidelines as agreed by the ICAO Working Group in the

Guidance Material

.

Note: The US Department of Transportation, through Order 2013

- 11 -22 dated 25 November

2013 , has previously granted exemption to this Agreement from Condition #2, imposed on

IATA’ s Procedures for the Conduct of the IATA Traffic Conferences, Agreement 1175, as amended by Order 68-7- 55

.CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 1 of 13



### RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 1630

CARGO SECURITY

CSC(35)1630 (amended) Expiry: Indefinite Type: A RECOGNISING the action taken by Contracting Member States of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and recognizing that ICAO has accorded the highest priority to aviation security in adopting and maintaining Annex 17 to reflect worldwide concern over acts of unlawful interference against aircraft; RECOGNISING ALSO the importance placed on aviation security by the IATA Operations Committee and the resulting Recommended Security Practice; and AS A RESULT OF these developments and action taken by the IATA Cargo Agency Conference in amending the Cargo Agency Rules to specifically require adherence to airline cargo security measures.

RECOMMENDED that:

1. SCOPE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE

This cargo security Recommended Practice is intended to protect air carrier operations against acts of unlawful interference. All Members and IATA Cargo Agents should implement the cargo security measures described in this Recommended Practice. All Members and IATA Cargo Agents should acknowledge and respect cargo security measures accepted or required by governments and those embodied in ICAO Annex 17. In increased threat situations, supplementary measures may be implemented. Guidance material to assist in the implementation of this Recommended Practice is available in the IATA Security Manual.

2. DEFINITIONS

The following definitions are adopted:

2.1 “ACCOUNT CONSIGNOR”. A consignor who originates cargo or mail fo r its own account and whose procedures meet common security rules and standards sufficient to allow carriage of that cargo on all-cargo aircraft or mail on all-mail aircraft.

2.2 “AIR SIDE”. The movement area of an airport, adjacent terrain and buildings or portions
thereof, access to which is controlled.

2.3 “KNOWN CONSIGNOR”. A consignor who originates cargo or mail for its own account and whose procedures meet common security rules and standards sufficient to allow carriage of cargo or mail on any aircraft.

2.4 “REGULATED AGENT”. An agent, freight forwarder or any other entity that conducts business with an air carrier and provides security controls that are accepted or required by the appropriate authority in respect of cargo or mail.

2.5 “REGULATED CARRIER”. Air Cargo or Mail Carrier, approved by an appropriate authority, operating into a destination Country from a departing Country Airport.

2.6 “SCREENING”. The application of technical or other means which are intended to identify and/or detect weapons, explosives or other dangerous devices, articles or substances which may be used to commit an act of unlawful interference.

2.7 “SECURITY”. Safeguarding civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference. This objective is achieved by a combination of measures and human and material resources.CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 2 of 13

2.8 “SECURITY CONTROL”. A means by which the introduction of weapons, explosives or other dangerous devices, articles or substances which may be used to commit an act of unlawful interference can be prevented.

2.9 “SECURITY PROGRAM”. Measures adopted to safeguard international civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference.

3. GENERAL PRINCIPLES

3.1 General

All cargo intended to be carried on passenger or all-cargo aircraft should be subjected to security controls before being uplifted on the aircraft.

3.2 Regulated Agent

3.2.1 Each Regulated Agent should have a security programme approved by the appropriate authority in respect of the acceptance, storage and forwarding of cargo.

3.2.2 Each Regulated Agent should register with the appropriate authority and establish with the air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agents authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.2.3 The appropriate authority should conduct periodic inspections of the facilities to ensure that the security programme has been implemented and is maintained.

3.3 Known Consignor

3.3.1 Each Known Consignor should register with the appropriate authority and establish with

th e Regulated Agents or air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agents authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.3.2 Known Consignors should declare in paper, electronic format, or any other means tha t may be allowed in the future its commitment that:

3.3.2.1 its consignments are prepared in secure premises; and

3.3.2.2 it employs reliable staff in preparing the consignments; and

3.3.2.3 it protects the consignments against unauthorized interference during preparation, storage and transportation.

3.3.3 Known Consignors should certify in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future that each consignment does not contain any unknown cargo or dangerous goods, or that dangerous goods in the consignment have been prepared in accordance with IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations.

3.3.4 Known Consignors accept that the package and contents of the consignment may be examined for security reasons.

3.4 Account Consignor

3.4 .1 Each Account Consignor should establish and register with the Regulated Agents or air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agents authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.4.2 Account Consignors should declare in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future its commitment that:

3.4.2.1 its consignments are prepared in secure premises; and

3.4.2.2 it employs reliable staff in preparing the consignments; and

3.4.2.3 it protects the consignments against unauthorized interference during preparation, storage and transportation.CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 3 of 13

3.4.3 Account Consignors should certify in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future that each consignment does not contain any unknown cargo or dangerous goods, or that dangerous goods in the consignment have been prepared in accordance with IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations.

3.4.4 Account Consignors accept that the package and contents of the consignment may be examined for security reasons.

3.5 Security Controls

All personnel accepting or handling cargo should be subjected to background checks, possess all competencies required to perform their duties and be appropriately trained according to the requirements established by the appropriate authority.

3.6 Security Screening Personnel

Persons involved in security screening of cargo, should be subjected to background checks, possess all competencies required to perform their duties and be appropriately trained according to the requirements established by the appropriate authority. Persons carrying out screening operations should be certified according to the requirements of the national civil aviation security programme to ensure that performance standards are consistently and reliably

achieved.

3.7 All Aircraft Operational Security

3.7.1 All cargo should be subjected to security controls prior to being uplifted on an aircraft. Air carriers should not accept cargo for carriage onto an aircraft unless it has applied such controlsitself or their application has been confirmed by a Regulated Agent, or if being uplifted on an allcargo aircraft, an account consignor.

3.7.2 All consignments accepted from Known Consignors and/or Regulated Agents will be deemed to have met required security provisions only after proper checks have been completed.

3.7.3 All consignments accepted from persons other than Known Consignors or Regulated Agents must be physically searched, electronically screened or screened by other means. In addition, a person other than a Known Consignor or Regulated Agent must provide acceptable documentation as to his identity, the details of which shall be recorded.

3.7.4 Cargo cleared for all-cargo operations should be subjected to appropriate security controls if transferred onto an all passenger aircraft (either at origin or before uplift onto a passenger aircraft).

3.8 Safe Custody

3.8.1 Air carriers must ensure that from the time of acceptance and until completion of air transportation, cargo consignments are protected from unauthorized interference.

3.8.2 All known cargo consignments that are not adequately protected from unauthorized interference after acceptance, as required by the National Civil Aviation Security Programme,

shall be screened.

3.9 Right of Inspection and Refusal of Carriage

3.9.1 Air carriers reserve the right to examine, or cause to be examined, the packaging and contents of all cargo consignments and to enquire into the correctness or sufficiency of information or documentation tendered in respect of any consignment.

3.9.2 Air carriers reserve the right, without assuming any liability, to refuse, delay or return any cargo or mail consignments when circumstances so require or for security reasons.CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 4 of 13

3.10 Acceptance of Mail

3.10.1 The responsibility for the security screening and sealing of mail is that of the postal

authorities.

3.10.2 Air carriers must ensure that mail is received by their authorized personnel who will establish the identity of the person presenting the mail that the seals are intact and that the bags do not show signs of having been interfered with.

3.11 Security Screening Equipment

Any equipment used to screen cargo consignments must be approved by the appropriate authority as being suitable for the task and shall be maintained and serviced so as to meet manufacturers' specifications as well as local health, safety and regulatory requirements. Where practicable, in order to improve efficiency, modern screening or examination techniques and technologies should be used to facilitate the physical examination of goods to be exported.

3.12 Security Declaration

3.12.1 The appropriate authorities and/or air carriers may require for each shipment a security declaration to be provided in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future. It is the responsibility of all Members and IATA Cargo Agents to be familiar and comply with any such security declaration requirements.

3.12.2 For paper security declarations, where not otherwise specified, it is recommended that the form to be used is the standard “Consignment Security Declaration” form shown in Attachment ‘A’. Completion instructions are shown as Attachment ‘B’. A completed form is

shown in Attachment ‘C’

. 3.12.3 Support of the electronic format can be provided through IATA CIMP messages (or IATA XML messages). This information can also be reproduced on the standard “Consignment Security Declaration” form. As an example, an indication of which fields fro m the Air Waybill Data (FWB) message can populate the form is shown in Attachment ‘D’.

3.12.4 The storage of this completed “Consignment Security Declaration” form or the electronic message information also establishes an audit trail that can be accessed by the regulators if requested.

4. IATA CARGO AGENTS

4.1 IATA Cargo Agents should ensure that the security standards described in this Recommended Practice are followed. In increased threat situations, supplementary security measures may be required by air carriers or appropriate authorities.

4.2 The Cargo Agency Conference Resolutions, which embody the rules for accreditation of cargo agents, include text specifically relating to security. This requires the agent to implement security controls as required by the appropriate authorities and which may be supplemented by

Member air carriers.

4.3 Cargo agents' security procedures should embody those in this Recommended Practice and include the following recommended provisions:

4.3.1 security requirements for the packing, storage, transportation and delivery of consignments to an approved agent or carrier;

4.3.2 established procedures for the identification and verification of persons including Account Consignors, Known Consignors or Regulated Agents and the recording of their details;

4.3.3 requirements for the physical protection and safe-keeping of consignments held in their custody prior to delivery to the carrier;

4.3.4 criteria for the training and recurrent training of agents' staff involved with security screening, storage, transportation and delivery of consignments.CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 5 of 13

5. GUIDELINES

Guidelines for the practical implementation of cargo security procedures are described in the IATA Security Manual.

...CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 6 of 13

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ A ’ C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identifier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) Unique Consignment Identifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn)

Content Contents of Consignment

 Co nsolidation

Origin Destination Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

Security Status Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Received from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds f or Exemption

(codes)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Security Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and Identifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party )

Additional Security InformationCSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 7 of 13

RECOMMENDED PRATICE 1630

Attachment ‘B’

Com pleti on I nstr uc tions

Box De scri ption

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Ide ntifier

The category (i.e.Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft Operator and its unique
identifier that originally issued the security status must be entered
The regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator that originally issued the security status, identified by its category (i.e. RA, KC or AO) and its unique identifier, must

be entered

.

Unique Consignment Identifier
The identification of the consignment itself must be enter ed . This may be an air waybill ( format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn ), a house bill or a mail consignment identifier.

Content s of the consignment The identification of the consignment details (e.g. goods description) must be entered in the

case of for a direct air waybill shipment or house waybill shipment.

In case of For a consolidation shipment, i.e. a master air waybill with associated house waybill(s),
the consolidation box should be ticked in lieu of the goods description.

Origin The identification of the origin of the consignment must be entered. This would be is the origin

related to
the appropriate transport document documentation (air waybill or house waybill) as identified in

Box 2 (e.g. IATA three-letter airport or city code).

Destination The identification of the final destination of the consignment must be entered. This would be is

the
destination related to the appropriate transport document documentation (air waybill or house
waybill) as identified in Box 2(e.g. IATA three-letter airport or city code).

Transit/ Transfer Transfer/Transit points

The identification of an en -route stopping point where cargo may be transferred to another aircraftor remain on board the same aircraft should be entered if known to the issuer, (e,g, IATA threeletter airport or city code)

. Otherwise this entry may be blank.

Security Status
The coded identification of the security status assigned to the consignment must be entered to
indicate whether the consignment is secure for:
a) pas senger, all-cargo and all-mail aircraft (some regions us e the code “SPX”) ; b) all-cargo and all-mail aircraft only (some regions use the code “SCO ”) ; or c) passenger, all-cargo and all-mail aircraft, in accordance with high-risk requirements (some regions use th e code “SHR”).CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 8 of 13

Received from The coded identification of the category (i.e. Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft
Operator regulated agent, known consignor, or aircraft operator ) that tendered the consignment must be entered . If no other reason, i.e. “ screening m ethod” or “ grounds for exemption” is indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked then this entry cannot be blank.

Screening Method
The coded identification of the screening methods (ICAO codes are still under development) used
by the Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft Operator the regulated agent, known consignor, or aircraft operator when securing the consignment could may be entered as a
reason that the security status was issued, e.g. s creening m ethod codes. If no ot her reason, i.e.

“ r eceived from” or “ g rounds for exemptions” is indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked

, then this entry cannot be blank. In some cases a single screening method may not be sufficient to inspect all types of consignments, therefore
more than one screening methods may be listed.

Grounds for Exemptions The coded identification (ICAO codes are still under development) indicating why a consignment is exempted from screening as defined in States’ NCASP State national civil av iation security

programmes could may be entered as a reason that the security status was issued, e.g.

s creening e xemptions codes. If no other reason, i.e. “ r eceived from” or “ s creening m ethod” is

indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked then this entry cannot be blank.

Specify Other Screening Method (s)

If the code entered in Box 9 Screening Method indicat es that any other means were applied then
text specifying the other means used must be entered.

Security status issued by

If the consolidation box is not ticked then the individual of the K nown Consignor Regulated
Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator who

issued the security status must be identified by name or employee number.

Security Status issued on
If the consolidation box is not ticked then the exact date and time when the security status was
issued by the regulated agent, known consignor, or aircraft operator e mployee must be indicated.

Regulate d Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) and Identifier
The identifier of any K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator that accepts custody of the cargo and accepts the
security status originally issued by the K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft
Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator i dentifie d in Box 1 must be
entered. This entry would confirm that the cargo has remained secure and would follow any other

entries f or other K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator that ha ve also accepted the original security s tatus

.

Additional security information Any additional security information that may be required by an ICAO Member State, e.g. any
national regulation applicable to the responsibilities in case of in the event of a false declaration,
or any applicable emergency amendment

. A signature of the responsible person initially issuing a
hardcopy co nsignment security declaration set out in box 1 should be inserted when the supply
chain is paper based.CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 9 of 13

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ B ’ ‘ A p p e n d i x A ’

C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identif ier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) Unique Consignment Identifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn)

Content Contents of Consignment

 Consolidation

Origin Destination Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

Se curity Status Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Received from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds for Exemption

(codes)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Secur ity Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and Identifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party )

Additional Security Information



### 15 12CSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 10 of 13

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ C ’ C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Catego ry ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identifier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) GB/RA/001

- 0110213 Unique Consignment Identifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn) 125

- 12345675

Content Contents of Consignment

 Consolidation

Origin

EDI Destina tion

LIT Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

LHR, JFK

Security Status

SPX Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Received from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds for Exemption

(code s)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Security Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and I dentifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party ) GB/RA/002

- 022/0215

US/RA/003

- 033/0316

Additional Security InformationCSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 11 of 13

RECOMMENDED PRATICE 1630

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ D ’

Message Completion Technical Instructions

IATA EDI messages, e.g. Cargo-IMP or Cargo-XML, can be used to exchange the required security information for a consignment.

For the purpose of these instructions, it is the IATA Cargo Interchange Procedures (C argo-IMP) Air Waybill Data (FWB) message used as the reference point.

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Identifier Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (ISS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (RA and ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

ISS - the regulated agent issuing the security status

OCI/GB/ISS/RA/001- 011

///ED/0213

Unique Consignment Identifier

Ref. 2.1 AWB Identification

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Content s of the consignment Ref. 12.11 Goods Description or Ref. 12.12 Consolidation

/NC/CONSOLIDATION

Origin Ref. 2.2.1 Airport/City Code (of Origin)

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Destination Ref. 2.2.2 Airport/City Code (of Destination)

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Transit/ Transfer Transfer/Transit points Ref. 4.2.2 Airport/City Code and 4.3.2 Airport/City Code

RTG/JFKII

Security Status Ref. 25. Special Handling Details

SPH/SPXCSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 12 of 13

Received from

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (ISS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (KC + ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information:

OCI/GB//KC/001- 011

///ED/0213

Specify Other Screening Method (s)

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regul atory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SM) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SM/RES

Grounds for Exemptions

Ref. 29 Other Custo ms, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (L) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///L/DIPL

Other Screening Method(s) Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SM) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SM/AOM-SPECIFY ANY OTHER MEANS

Security status issued by

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SN) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SN/JOHNNY WALKER

Security Status issued on

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SD) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SD/05MAR131200

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Identifier Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (OSS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (RA and ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control InformationCSC Mail Vote (S0 76 ) Page 13 of 13

OSS - the regulated agent accepting the security status given by another regulated agent

OCI/GB/ISS/RA/001- 011

///ED/0213

/US/OSS/RA/002- 022

///ED/0213

Additional security information

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (ST) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///ST/THIS MASTER AIR WAYBILL CONTAINS NO

///ST/1. FREIGHT FROM THAT COUNTRY

///ST/2. TONER CARTRIDGE GREATER THAN 550

///ST/ GRAMS TRANSFERRING THIS COUNTRYwww.iata.org International Air Transport Association

Route de l'Aéroport 33, PO Box 416

CH

- 1215 Geneva 15 Airport

Switzerland 

### M E M O R AN D U M

CSC/MailVote/00 2 /201 3

TO: All Members of IATA

Cargo Services Conference Accredited Representatives

FROM: Secretary, Cargo Services Conference

DATE: 1 7 December 201 3

SUBJECT: RESULT

– CSC MAIL VOTE (S0 7 6 )

– Recommended Practice 16 30

Members are referred to Memorandum CSC/MailVote/00 1 /201 3 dated 23 August 201 3 seeking approval for amendment to Recommended Practice 16 30

.

The voting period ended on 1 2 September 201 3 and a ffirmative votes were received from voting Members who have voted within the prescribed period. Some clarification was sought by a Member which was addressed following some discussion. Accordingly, the amendment to

Recommended Practice 1630 is hereby declared adopted by the Cargo Services Conference. The Finally Adopted Resolution (FAR) for government filing will be circulated shortly.

Thank y ou for your participation.

Sincerely,

Andrea Gruber Manager Business Process & Standards , IATAM E M O R A N D U M

CSC/Mail Vote / 00 1 / 20 1 3

TO: All Members of IATA

Cargo Services Conference (CSC) Accredited Representatives

CC : Members, Cargo Procedures Conferences Management Group

IATA Regional Cargo Managers

FROM: Secretary, Cargo Services Conference

DATE: 2 3 August 201 3

SUBJECT: CSC MAIL VOTE ( S07 6 )

– Recommended Practice 1630

– Cargo

Security

Dear CSC Members,

As Members would recall, at CSC/35 in March 2013, the Conference adopted amendments to

Recommended Practice 1630 to reflec t the revised version of the Consignment Security
Declaration, which ha d been agreed in principle at the ICAO Working Group on Air Cargo Security (WCACS) in November 201 2. However, subsequent to CSC/35, some further changes to the Consignment Security Decl aration were agreed by the ICAO Working Group

, as published in the ICAO Aviation Security Manual, Doc 8973, Eight Edition Amendment 1.

Therefore, it is proposed to make some corresponding amendments to Recommended Practice 1630 to align with the latest v ersion of the Consignment Security Declaration in the ICAO Aviation Security Manual. The proposed amendments, which include the latest layout of the Consignment Security Declaration along with the accompanying completion guidelines as agreed by the ICAO Wo rking Group in the Guidance Material

, a re attached herewith.

CSC Voting Procedures

The voting period will run for 21 days from the date of this memorandum. Members are requested to submit the vote by sending an email to IATA Cargo at cargo@iata.org with

reference “CSC Mail Vote S07 6 ” latest by Friday

, 1 2 September 201 3

.

The voting procedure is as follows:

 Specimen positive vote advice: XYZ Airlines hereby votes in favor of the proposed amendment to Recommended Pr actice 16 30

.

 Specimen negative vote advice: XYZ Airlines hereby votes against the proposed

amendment to Recommended Practice 16 30

.

 Abstentions: Please note that abstentions will count as positive votes.CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 2 of 15

Thank you for your participation.

Sincerely,

Fr ederic Leger Head of Cargo Business Process & Standards , IATA

 AttachmentCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 3 of 15



### RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 1630

CARGO SECURITY

CSC(35)1630 (amended) Expiry: Indefinite Type: A RECOGNISING the action taken by Contracting Member States of the Internatio nal Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and recognizing that ICAO has accorded the highest priority to aviation security in adopting and maintaining Annex 17 to reflect worldwide concern over acts of unlawful interference against aircraft;

RECOGNISING ALSO the importance placed on aviation security by the IATA Operations Committee and the resulting Recommended Security Practice; and AS A RESULT OF these developments and action taken by the IATA Cargo Agency Conference in amending the Cargo Agency Rules to specifically require adherence to airline cargo security measures.

RECOMMENDED that:

1. SCOPE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE

This cargo security Recommended Practice is intended to protect air carrier operations against

acts of unlawful interference. All Member s and IATA Cargo Agents should implement the cargo security measures described in this Recommended Practice. All Members and IATA Cargo Agents should acknowledge and respect cargo security measures accepted or required by governments and those embodied in ICAO Annex 17. In increased threat situations, supplementary measures may be implemented. Guidance material to assist in the implementation of this Recommended Practice is available in the IATA Security Manual.

2. DEFINITIONS

The following definitions ar e adopted:

2.1 “ACCOUNT CONSIGNOR”. A consignor who originates cargo or mail for its own account and whose procedures meet common security rules and standards sufficient to allow carriage of that cargo on all

- cargo aircraft or mail on all

- mail aircraft.

2.2 “AIR SIDE”. The movement area of an airport, adjacent terrain and buildings or portions
thereof, access to which is controlled.

2.3 “KNOWN CONSIGNOR”. A consignor who originates cargo or mail for its own account and whose procedures meet common secu rity rules and standards sufficient to allow carriage of cargo or mail on any aircraft.

2.4 “REGULATED AGENT”. An agent, freight forwarder or any other entity that conducts business with an air carrier and provides security controls that are accepted or required by the appropriate authority in respect of cargo or mail.

2.5 “REGULATED CARRIER”. Air Cargo or Mail Carrier, approved by an appropriate authority, operating into a destination Country from a departing Country Airport.

2.6 “SCREENING”. The appl ication of technical or other means which are intended to identify and/or detect weapons, explosives or other dangerous devices, articles or substances which may be used to commit an act of unlawful interference.

2.7 “SECURITY”. Safeguarding civil aviatio n against acts of unlawful interference. This objective is achieved by a combination of measures and human and material resources.

2.8 “SECURITY CONTROL”. A means by which the introduction of weapons, explosives or other dangerous devices, articles or sub stances which may be used to commit an act of unlawful interference can be prevented.CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 4 of 15

2.9 “SECURITY PROGRAM”. Measures adopted to safeguard international civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference.

3. GENERAL PRINCIPLES

3.1 General

All cargo intended to be carried on passenger or all

- cargo aircraft should be subjected to security controls before being uplifted on the aircraft.

3.2 Regulated Agent

3.2.1 Each Regulated Agent should have a security programme approved by the appropriate

authori ty in respect of the acceptance, storage and forwarding of cargo.

3.2.2 Each Regulated Agent should register with the appropriate authority and establish with the air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agent s authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.2.3 The appropriate authority should conduct periodic inspections of the facilities to ensure that the security programme has been implemented and is maintained.

3.3 Known Consignor

3.3.1 Each Know n Consignor should register with the appropriate authority and establish with the Regulated Agents or air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agents authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.3.2 Kno wn Consignors should declare in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future its commitment that:

3.3.2.1 its consignments are prepared in secure premises; and

3.3.2.2 it employs reliable staff in preparing the consign ments; and

3.3.2.3 it protects the consignments against unauthorized interference during preparation, storage and transportation.

3.3.3 Known Consignors should certify in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may

be allowed in the future th at each consignment does not contain any unknown cargo or dangerous goods, or that dangerous goods in the consignment have been prepared in accordance with IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations.

3.3.4 Known Consignors accept that the package and contents of t he consignment may be examined for security reasons.

3.4 Account Consignor

3.4.1 Each Account Consignor should establish and register with the Regulated Agents or air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agent s authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.4.2 Account Consignors should declare in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future its commitment that:

3.4.2.1 its consignments are prepared in secure premises; and

3.4.2.2 it employs reliable staff in preparing the consignments; and

3.4.2.3 it protects the consignments against unauthorized interference during preparation, storage and transportation.

3.4.3 Account Consignors should certify in paper, electron ic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future that each consignment does not contain any unknown cargo or dangerous goods, or that dangerous goods in the consignment have been prepared in accordance with IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations.CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 5 of 15

3.4.4 Account Consignors accept that the package and contents of the consignment may be examined for security reasons.

3.5 Security Controls

All personnel accepting or handling cargo should be subjected to background checks, possess all competencies re quired to perform their duties and be appropriately trained according to the requirements established by the appropriate authority.

3.6 Security Screening Personnel

Persons involved in security screening of cargo, should be subjected to background checks

, possess all competencies required to perform their duties and be appropriately trained according to the requirements established by the appropriate authority. Persons carrying out screening operations should be certified according to the requirements of the national civil aviation security programme to ensure that performance standards are consistently and reliably

achieved.

3.7 All Aircraft Operational Security

3.7.1 All cargo should be subjected to security controls prior to being uplifted on an air craft. Air carriers should not accept cargo for carriage onto an aircraft unless it has applied such controls itself or their application has been confirmed by a Regulated Agent, or if being uplifted on an all

cargo aircraft, an account consignor.

3.7.2 All consignments accepted from Known Consignors and/or Regulated Agents will be deemed to have met required security provisions only after proper checks have been completed.

3.7.3 All consignments accepted from persons other than Known Consignors or Reg ulated Agents must be physically searched, electronically screened or screened by other means. In addition, a person other than a Known Consignor or Regulated Agent must provide acceptable documentation as to his identity, the details of which shall be rec orded.

3.7.4 Cargo cleared for all

- cargo operations should be subjected to appropriate security controls if transferred onto an all passenger aircraft (either at origin or before uplift onto a passenger aircraft).

3.8 Safe Custody

3.8.1 Air carriers m ust ensure that from the time of acceptance and until completion of air transportation, cargo consignments are protected from unauthorized interference.

3.8.2 All known cargo consignments that are not adequately protected from unauthorized

interference after acceptance, as required by the National Civil Aviation Security Programme,

shall be screened.

3.9 Right of Inspection and Refusal of Carriage

3.9.1 Air carriers reserve the right to examine, or cause to be examined, the packaging and

contents of all cargo consignments and to enquire into the correctness or sufficiency of information or documentation tendered in respect of any consignment.

3.9.2 Air carriers reserve the right, without assuming any liability, to refuse, delay or return any

cargo o r mail consignments when circumstances so require or for security reasons.

3.10 Acceptance of MailCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 6 of 15

3.10.1 The responsibility for the security screening and sealing of mail is that of the postal

authorities.

3.10.2 Air carriers must ensure that mail i s received by their authorized personnel who will establish the identity of the person presenting the mail that the seals are intact and that the bags do not show signs of having been interfered with.

3.11 Security Screening Equipment

Any equipment used to screen cargo consignments must be approved by the appropriate authority as being suitable for the task and shall be maintained and serviced so as to meet manufacturers' specifications as well as local health, safety and regulatory requirements. Where

pr acticable, in order to improve efficiency, modern screening or examination techniques and technologies should be used to facilitate the physical examination of goods to be exported.

3.12 Security Declaration

3.12.1 The appropriate authorities and/or ai r carriers may require for each shipment a security declaration to be provided in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future. It is the responsibility of all Members and IATA Cargo Agents to be familiar and comply with a ny such security declaration requirements.

3.12.2 For paper security declarations, where not otherwise specified, it is recommended that the form to be used is the standard “Consignment Security Declaration” form shown in Attachment ‘A’. Completion instr uctions are shown as Attachment ‘B’. A completed form is

shown in Attachment ‘C’.

3.12.3 Support of the electronic format can be provided through IATA CIMP messages (or IATA XML messages). This information can also be reproduced on the standard “Consignm ent Security Declaration” form. As an example, an indication of which fields from the Air Waybill Data (FWB) message can populate the form is shown in Attachment ‘D’.

3.12.4 The storage of this completed “Consignment Security Declaration” form or the elec tronic message information also establishes an audit trail that can be accessed by the regulators if requested.

4. IATA CARGO AGENTS

4.1 IATA Cargo Agents should ensure that the security standards described in this

Recommended Practice are followed. In i ncreased threat situations, supplementary security measures may be required by air carriers or appropriate authorities.

4.2 The Cargo Agency Conference Resolutions, which embody the rules for accreditation of cargo agents, include text specifically relati ng to security. This requires the agent to implement security controls as required by the appropriate authorities and which may be supplemented by

Member air carriers.

4.3 Cargo agents' security procedures should embody those in this Recommended Practice and include the following recommended provisions:

4.3.1 security requirements for the packing, storage, transportation and delivery of consignments to an approved agent or carrier;

4.3.2 established procedures for the identification and verification of p ersons including Account Consignors, Known Consignors or Regulated Agents and the recording of their details;

4.3.3 requirements for the physical protection and safe

- keeping of consignments held in their custody prior to delivery to the carrier;

4.3.4 cr iteria for the training and recurrent training of agents' staff involved with security screening, storage, transportation and delivery of consignments.

5. GUIDELINESCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 7 of 15

Guidelines for the practical implementation of cargo security procedures are described i n the IATA Security Manual.

...CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 8 of 15

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ A ’ C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identifier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) Unique Consignment Ide ntifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn)

Content Contents of Consignment

 Consolidation

Origin Destination Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

Security Status Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Received from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds for Exemption

(codes)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Security Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and Identifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party )

Additional Security Informat ionCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 9 of 15

RECOMMENDED PRATICE 1630

Attachment ‘B’

Com pleti on I nstr uc tions

Box De scri ption

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Ide ntifier

The category (i.e.Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft Operator and its unique
identifier that originally issued the security status must be entered
The regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator that originally issued the security status, identified by its category (i.e. RA, KC or AO) and its unique identifier, must

be entered

.

Unique Consignment Identifier

The identification of t he consignment itself must be enter ed . This may be an air waybill ( format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn ), a house bill or a mail consignment identifier.

Content s of the consignment

The identification of the consignment details (e.g. goods description) must be entered in the

case of for a direct air waybill shipment or house waybill shipment.

In case of For a consolidation shipment, i.e. a master air waybill with associated house waybill(s),

the consolid ation box should be ticked in lieu of the goods description.

Origi n The identification of the origin of the consignment must be entered. This would be is the origin

related to
the appropriate transport document documentation (air waybill or house way bill) as identified in

Box 2 (e.g. IATA three

- letter airport or city code).

Destination The identification of the final destination of the consignment must be entered. This would be is

the
destination related to the appropriate transport document documentation (air waybill or house
waybill)

as identified in Box 2( e.g. IATA three

- letter airport or city code).

Transit/ Transfer Transfer/Transit points

The identification of an en

- route stopping point where cargo may be transferred to another ai rcraft

or remain on board the same aircraft should be entered if known to the issuer, ( e,g, IATA three

letter airport or city code)

. O therwise this entry may be blank.

Security Status
The coded identification of the security status assigned to the co nsignment must be entered to

indicate whether the consignment is secure for:
a) passenger, all

- cargo and all

- mail aircraft ( s ome regions us e the code “SPX”) ; b) all

- cargo and all

- mail aircraft only ( some regions use the code “SCO ”) ; or c) passenger, all

- cargo and a ll

- mail aircraft, in accordance with high

- risk requirements (some regions use the code “SHR”).

Received fromCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 10 of 15

The coded identification of the category (i.e. Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft
Operator regulated agent, known consignor, or aircr aft operator ) that tendered the consignment must be entered . If no other reason, i.e. “ s creening m ethod” or “ g rounds for exemption” is indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked then this entry cannot be blank.

Screening Method

The coded identif ication of the screening methods (ICAO codes are still under development) used
by the Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft Operator the regulated agent, known consignor, or aircraft operator when securing the consignment could may be entered as a

r eason that the security status was issued, e.g. s creening m ethod codes. If no other reason, i.e.

“ r eceived from” or “ g rounds for exemptions” is indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked

, then this entry cannot be blank. In some cases a
single s creening method may not be sufficient to inspect all types of consignments, therefore

more than one screening methods may be listed.

Grounds for E xemptions

The coded identification (ICAO codes are still under development) indicating why a consignment

is exempted from screening as defined in States’ NCASP State national civil aviation security

programmes could may be entered as a reason that the security status was issued, e.g.

s creening e xemptions codes. If no other reason, i.e. “ r eceived from” or “ s creening m ethod” is
indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked then this entry cannot be blank.

Specify O ther S creening M ethod (s)

If the code entered in Box 9 Screening Method indicat es that any other means were applied then

text specifying th e other means used must be entered.

Security status issued by

If the consolidation box is not ticked then the individual of the K nown Consignor Regulated
Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator who

issued the security status must be identified by name or employee number.

Security Status i ssued on If the consolidation box is not ticked then the exact date and time when the security status was
issued by the regulated agent, known consigno r, or aircraft operator e mployee must be indicated.

R egulated Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) and Identifier
The identifier of any K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft opera tor that accepts custody of the cargo and accepts the
security status originally issued by the K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft
Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator i dentifie d in Box 1 must be
entered. This entry would confirm that the cargo has remained secure and would follow any other

entries for other K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator that ha ve also accepted the original security s tatus

.

A dditional security information Any additional security information that may be required by an ICAO Member State, e.g. any
national regulation applicable to the responsibilities in case of in the event of a false declaration,
or any applicable emergency amendment

. A signature of the responsible person initially issuing a
hardcopy consignment security declaration set out in box 1 should be inserted when the supply
chain is paper based.CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 11 of 15

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ B ’ ‘ A p p e n d i x A ’

C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identifier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) Unique Consignment Identifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn)

Content Contents of Consignment

 Consolidati on

Origin Destination Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

Security Status Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Received from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds for Exemption

(codes)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Security Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party E ntity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and Identifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party )

Additional Security Information



### 15 12CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 12 of 15

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ C ’

C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identifier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) GB/RA/001

- 0110213 Unique Consignment Identifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn)
12 5

- 12345675

Content Contents of Consignment

 Consolidation

Origin

EDI Destination

LIT Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

LHR, JFK

Security Status

SPX Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Receive d from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds for Exemption

(codes)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Security Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and Identifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party ) GB/RA/002

- 022/0215

US/RA/003

- 033/0316

Additional S ecurity InformationCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 13 of 15

RECOMMENDED PRATICE 1630

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ D ’

Message Completion Technical Instructions

IATA EDI messages, e.g. Cargo

- IMP or Cargo

- XML, can be used to exchange the required security information for a consignment.

For th e purpose of these instructions, it is the IATA Cargo Interchange Procedures (Cargo

- IMP) Air Waybill Data (FWB) message used as the reference point.

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Identifier Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (ISS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (RA and ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and R egulatory Control Information

ISS

- the regulated agent issuing the security status

OCI/GB/ISS/RA/001

- 011

///ED/0213

Unique Consignment Identifier

Ref. 2.1 AWB Identification

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Content s of the consignment

Ref. 12.11 Goods D escription or Ref. 12.12 Consolidation

/NC/CONSOLIDATION

Origin Ref. 2.2.1 Airport/City Code (of Origin)

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Destination Ref. 2.2.2 Airport/City Code (of Destination)

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Transit/ Transfer Transfer /Transit points Ref. 4.2.2 Airport/City Code and 4.3.2 Airport/City Code

RTG/JFKII

Security Status Ref. 25. Special Handling Details

SPH/SPXCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 14 of 15

Received from

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular

Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (ISS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (KC + ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information:

OCI/GB//KC/001

- 011

///ED/021 3

Specify Other Screening Method (s)

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SM) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulat ory Control Information

///SM/RES

Grounds for Exemptions

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (L) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///L/DIPL

Other Screening Method(s) Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SM) +

Ref. 2 9.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SM/AOM

- SPECIFY ANY OTHER MEANS

Security status issued by

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regu latory Control Information Identifier (SN) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SN/JOHNNY WALKER

Security Status issued on

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular

R ef. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SD) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SD/05MAR131200

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Identifier

Ref. 29 Oth er Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (OSS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (RA and ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary C ustoms, Security and Regulatory Control InformationCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 15 of 15

OSS

- the regulated agent accepting the security status given by another regulated agent

OCI/GB/ISS/RA/001

- 011

///ED/0213

/US/OSS/RA/002

- 022

///ED/0213

Additional security information

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (ST) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///ST/THIS MASTER AIR WAYBI LL CONTAINS NO

///ST/1. FREIGHT FROM THAT COUNTRY

///ST/2. TONER CARTRIDGE GREATER THAN 550

///ST/ GRAMS TRANSFERRING THIS COUNTRYwww.iata.org International Air Transport Association

Route de l'Aéroport 33, PO Box 416

CH

- 1215 Geneva 15 Airport

Switzerland 

### M E M O R AN D U M

CSC/MailVote/00 2 /201 3

TO: All Members of IATA

Cargo Services Conference Accredited Representatives

FROM: Secretary, Cargo Services Conference

DATE: 1 7 December 201 3

SUBJECT: RESULT

– CSC MAIL VOTE (S0 7 6 )

– Recommended Practice 16 30

Members are referred to Memorandum CSC/MailVote/00 1 /201 3 dated 23 August 201 3 seeking approval for amendment to Recommended Practice 16 30

.

The voting period ended on 1 2 September 201 3 and a ffirmative votes were received from voting Members who have voted within the prescribed period. Some clarification was sought by a Member which was addressed following some discussion. Accordingly, the amendment to

Recommended Practice 1630 is hereby declared adopted by the Cargo Services Conference. The Finally Adopted Resolution (FAR) for government filing will be circulated shortly.

Thank y ou for your participation.

Sincerely,

Andrea Gruber Manager Business Process & Standards , IATAM E M O R A N D U M

CSC/Mail Vote / 00 1 / 20 1 3

TO: All Members of IATA

Cargo Services Conference (CSC) Accredited Representatives

CC : Members, Cargo Procedures Conferences Management Group

IATA Regional Cargo Managers

FROM: Secretary, Cargo Services Conference

DATE: 2 3 August 201 3

SUBJECT: CSC MAIL VOTE ( S07 6 )

– Recommended Practice 1630

– Cargo

Security

Dear CSC Members,

As Members would recall, at CSC/35 in March 2013, the Conference adopted amendments to

Recommended Practice 1630 to reflec t the revised version of the Consignment Security
Declaration, which ha d been agreed in principle at the ICAO Working Group on Air Cargo Security (WCACS) in November 201 2. However, subsequent to CSC/35, some further changes to the Consignment Security Decl aration were agreed by the ICAO Working Group

, as published in the ICAO Aviation Security Manual, Doc 8973, Eight Edition Amendment 1.

Therefore, it is proposed to make some corresponding amendments to Recommended Practice 1630 to align with the latest v ersion of the Consignment Security Declaration in the ICAO Aviation Security Manual. The proposed amendments, which include the latest layout of the Consignment Security Declaration along with the accompanying completion guidelines as agreed by the ICAO Wo rking Group in the Guidance Material

, a re attached herewith.

CSC Voting Procedures

The voting period will run for 21 days from the date of this memorandum. Members are requested to submit the vote by sending an email to IATA Cargo at cargo@iata.org with

reference “CSC Mail Vote S07 6 ” latest by Friday

, 1 2 September 201 3

.

The voting procedure is as follows:

 Specimen positive vote advice: XYZ Airlines hereby votes in favor of the proposed amendment to Recommended Pr actice 16 30

.

 Specimen negative vote advice: XYZ Airlines hereby votes against the proposed

amendment to Recommended Practice 16 30

.

 Abstentions: Please note that abstentions will count as positive votes.CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 2 of 15

Thank you for your participation.

Sincerely,

Fr ederic Leger Head of Cargo Business Process & Standards , IATA

 AttachmentCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 3 of 15



### RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 1630

CARGO SECURITY

CSC(35)1630 (amended) Expiry: Indefinite Type: A RECOGNISING the action taken by Contracting Member States of the Internatio nal Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and recognizing that ICAO has accorded the highest priority to aviation security in adopting and maintaining Annex 17 to reflect worldwide concern over acts of unlawful interference against aircraft;

RECOGNISING ALSO the importance placed on aviation security by the IATA Operations Committee and the resulting Recommended Security Practice; and AS A RESULT OF these developments and action taken by the IATA Cargo Agency Conference in amending the Cargo Agency Rules to specifically require adherence to airline cargo security measures.

RECOMMENDED that:

1. SCOPE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE

This cargo security Recommended Practice is intended to protect air carrier operations against

acts of unlawful interference. All Member s and IATA Cargo Agents should implement the cargo security measures described in this Recommended Practice. All Members and IATA Cargo Agents should acknowledge and respect cargo security measures accepted or required by governments and those embodied in ICAO Annex 17. In increased threat situations, supplementary measures may be implemented. Guidance material to assist in the implementation of this Recommended Practice is available in the IATA Security Manual.

2. DEFINITIONS

The following definitions ar e adopted:

2.1 “ACCOUNT CONSIGNOR”. A consignor who originates cargo or mail for its own account and whose procedures meet common security rules and standards sufficient to allow carriage of that cargo on all

- cargo aircraft or mail on all

- mail aircraft.

2.2 “AIR SIDE”. The movement area of an airport, adjacent terrain and buildings or portions
thereof, access to which is controlled.

2.3 “KNOWN CONSIGNOR”. A consignor who originates cargo or mail for its own account and whose procedures meet common secu rity rules and standards sufficient to allow carriage of cargo or mail on any aircraft.

2.4 “REGULATED AGENT”. An agent, freight forwarder or any other entity that conducts business with an air carrier and provides security controls that are accepted or required by the appropriate authority in respect of cargo or mail.

2.5 “REGULATED CARRIER”. Air Cargo or Mail Carrier, approved by an appropriate authority, operating into a destination Country from a departing Country Airport.

2.6 “SCREENING”. The appl ication of technical or other means which are intended to identify and/or detect weapons, explosives or other dangerous devices, articles or substances which may be used to commit an act of unlawful interference.

2.7 “SECURITY”. Safeguarding civil aviatio n against acts of unlawful interference. This objective is achieved by a combination of measures and human and material resources.

2.8 “SECURITY CONTROL”. A means by which the introduction of weapons, explosives or other dangerous devices, articles or sub stances which may be used to commit an act of unlawful interference can be prevented.CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 4 of 15

2.9 “SECURITY PROGRAM”. Measures adopted to safeguard international civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference.

3. GENERAL PRINCIPLES

3.1 General

All cargo intended to be carried on passenger or all

- cargo aircraft should be subjected to security controls before being uplifted on the aircraft.

3.2 Regulated Agent

3.2.1 Each Regulated Agent should have a security programme approved by the appropriate

authori ty in respect of the acceptance, storage and forwarding of cargo.

3.2.2 Each Regulated Agent should register with the appropriate authority and establish with the air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agent s authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.2.3 The appropriate authority should conduct periodic inspections of the facilities to ensure that the security programme has been implemented and is maintained.

3.3 Known Consignor

3.3.1 Each Know n Consignor should register with the appropriate authority and establish with the Regulated Agents or air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agents authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.3.2 Kno wn Consignors should declare in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future its commitment that:

3.3.2.1 its consignments are prepared in secure premises; and

3.3.2.2 it employs reliable staff in preparing the consign ments; and

3.3.2.3 it protects the consignments against unauthorized interference during preparation, storage and transportation.

3.3.3 Known Consignors should certify in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may

be allowed in the future th at each consignment does not contain any unknown cargo or dangerous goods, or that dangerous goods in the consignment have been prepared in accordance with IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations.

3.3.4 Known Consignors accept that the package and contents of t he consignment may be examined for security reasons.

3.4 Account Consignor

3.4.1 Each Account Consignor should establish and register with the Regulated Agents or air carriers, that it conducts business with, its identity and address as well as the agent s authorized to carry out deliveries on its behalf.

3.4.2 Account Consignors should declare in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future its commitment that:

3.4.2.1 its consignments are prepared in secure premises; and

3.4.2.2 it employs reliable staff in preparing the consignments; and

3.4.2.3 it protects the consignments against unauthorized interference during preparation, storage and transportation.

3.4.3 Account Consignors should certify in paper, electron ic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future that each consignment does not contain any unknown cargo or dangerous goods, or that dangerous goods in the consignment have been prepared in accordance with IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations.CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 5 of 15

3.4.4 Account Consignors accept that the package and contents of the consignment may be examined for security reasons.

3.5 Security Controls

All personnel accepting or handling cargo should be subjected to background checks, possess all competencies re quired to perform their duties and be appropriately trained according to the requirements established by the appropriate authority.

3.6 Security Screening Personnel

Persons involved in security screening of cargo, should be subjected to background checks

, possess all competencies required to perform their duties and be appropriately trained according to the requirements established by the appropriate authority. Persons carrying out screening operations should be certified according to the requirements of the national civil aviation security programme to ensure that performance standards are consistently and reliably

achieved.

3.7 All Aircraft Operational Security

3.7.1 All cargo should be subjected to security controls prior to being uplifted on an air craft. Air carriers should not accept cargo for carriage onto an aircraft unless it has applied such controls itself or their application has been confirmed by a Regulated Agent, or if being uplifted on an all

cargo aircraft, an account consignor.

3.7.2 All consignments accepted from Known Consignors and/or Regulated Agents will be deemed to have met required security provisions only after proper checks have been completed.

3.7.3 All consignments accepted from persons other than Known Consignors or Reg ulated Agents must be physically searched, electronically screened or screened by other means. In addition, a person other than a Known Consignor or Regulated Agent must provide acceptable documentation as to his identity, the details of which shall be rec orded.

3.7.4 Cargo cleared for all

- cargo operations should be subjected to appropriate security controls if transferred onto an all passenger aircraft (either at origin or before uplift onto a passenger aircraft).

3.8 Safe Custody

3.8.1 Air carriers m ust ensure that from the time of acceptance and until completion of air transportation, cargo consignments are protected from unauthorized interference.

3.8.2 All known cargo consignments that are not adequately protected from unauthorized

interference after acceptance, as required by the National Civil Aviation Security Programme,

shall be screened.

3.9 Right of Inspection and Refusal of Carriage

3.9.1 Air carriers reserve the right to examine, or cause to be examined, the packaging and

contents of all cargo consignments and to enquire into the correctness or sufficiency of information or documentation tendered in respect of any consignment.

3.9.2 Air carriers reserve the right, without assuming any liability, to refuse, delay or return any

cargo o r mail consignments when circumstances so require or for security reasons.

3.10 Acceptance of MailCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 6 of 15

3.10.1 The responsibility for the security screening and sealing of mail is that of the postal

authorities.

3.10.2 Air carriers must ensure that mail i s received by their authorized personnel who will establish the identity of the person presenting the mail that the seals are intact and that the bags do not show signs of having been interfered with.

3.11 Security Screening Equipment

Any equipment used to screen cargo consignments must be approved by the appropriate authority as being suitable for the task and shall be maintained and serviced so as to meet manufacturers' specifications as well as local health, safety and regulatory requirements. Where

pr acticable, in order to improve efficiency, modern screening or examination techniques and technologies should be used to facilitate the physical examination of goods to be exported.

3.12 Security Declaration

3.12.1 The appropriate authorities and/or ai r carriers may require for each shipment a security declaration to be provided in paper, electronic format, or any other means that may be allowed in the future. It is the responsibility of all Members and IATA Cargo Agents to be familiar and comply with a ny such security declaration requirements.

3.12.2 For paper security declarations, where not otherwise specified, it is recommended that the form to be used is the standard “Consignment Security Declaration” form shown in Attachment ‘A’. Completion instr uctions are shown as Attachment ‘B’. A completed form is

shown in Attachment ‘C’.

3.12.3 Support of the electronic format can be provided through IATA CIMP messages (or IATA XML messages). This information can also be reproduced on the standard “Consignm ent Security Declaration” form. As an example, an indication of which fields from the Air Waybill Data (FWB) message can populate the form is shown in Attachment ‘D’.

3.12.4 The storage of this completed “Consignment Security Declaration” form or the elec tronic message information also establishes an audit trail that can be accessed by the regulators if requested.

4. IATA CARGO AGENTS

4.1 IATA Cargo Agents should ensure that the security standards described in this

Recommended Practice are followed. In i ncreased threat situations, supplementary security measures may be required by air carriers or appropriate authorities.

4.2 The Cargo Agency Conference Resolutions, which embody the rules for accreditation of cargo agents, include text specifically relati ng to security. This requires the agent to implement security controls as required by the appropriate authorities and which may be supplemented by

Member air carriers.

4.3 Cargo agents' security procedures should embody those in this Recommended Practice and include the following recommended provisions:

4.3.1 security requirements for the packing, storage, transportation and delivery of consignments to an approved agent or carrier;

4.3.2 established procedures for the identification and verification of p ersons including Account Consignors, Known Consignors or Regulated Agents and the recording of their details;

4.3.3 requirements for the physical protection and safe

- keeping of consignments held in their custody prior to delivery to the carrier;

4.3.4 cr iteria for the training and recurrent training of agents' staff involved with security screening, storage, transportation and delivery of consignments.

5. GUIDELINESCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 7 of 15

Guidelines for the practical implementation of cargo security procedures are described i n the IATA Security Manual.

...CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 8 of 15

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ A ’ C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identifier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) Unique Consignment Ide ntifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn)

Content Contents of Consignment

 Consolidation

Origin Destination Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

Security Status Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Received from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds for Exemption

(codes)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Security Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and Identifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party )

Additional Security Informat ionCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 9 of 15

RECOMMENDED PRATICE 1630

Attachment ‘B’

Com pleti on I nstr uc tions

Box De scri ption

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Ide ntifier

The category (i.e.Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft Operator and its unique
identifier that originally issued the security status must be entered
The regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator that originally issued the security status, identified by its category (i.e. RA, KC or AO) and its unique identifier, must

be entered

.

Unique Consignment Identifier

The identification of t he consignment itself must be enter ed . This may be an air waybill ( format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn ), a house bill or a mail consignment identifier.

Content s of the consignment

The identification of the consignment details (e.g. goods description) must be entered in the

case of for a direct air waybill shipment or house waybill shipment.

In case of For a consolidation shipment, i.e. a master air waybill with associated house waybill(s),

the consolid ation box should be ticked in lieu of the goods description.

Origi n The identification of the origin of the consignment must be entered. This would be is the origin

related to
the appropriate transport document documentation (air waybill or house way bill) as identified in

Box 2 (e.g. IATA three

- letter airport or city code).

Destination The identification of the final destination of the consignment must be entered. This would be is

the
destination related to the appropriate transport document documentation (air waybill or house
waybill)

as identified in Box 2( e.g. IATA three

- letter airport or city code).

Transit/ Transfer Transfer/Transit points

The identification of an en

- route stopping point where cargo may be transferred to another ai rcraft

or remain on board the same aircraft should be entered if known to the issuer, ( e,g, IATA three

letter airport or city code)

. O therwise this entry may be blank.

Security Status
The coded identification of the security status assigned to the co nsignment must be entered to

indicate whether the consignment is secure for:
a) passenger, all

- cargo and all

- mail aircraft ( s ome regions us e the code “SPX”) ; b) all

- cargo and all

- mail aircraft only ( some regions use the code “SCO ”) ; or c) passenger, all

- cargo and a ll

- mail aircraft, in accordance with high

- risk requirements (some regions use the code “SHR”).

Received fromCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 10 of 15

The coded identification of the category (i.e. Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft
Operator regulated agent, known consignor, or aircr aft operator ) that tendered the consignment must be entered . If no other reason, i.e. “ s creening m ethod” or “ g rounds for exemption” is indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked then this entry cannot be blank.

Screening Method

The coded identif ication of the screening methods (ICAO codes are still under development) used
by the Known Consignor, Regulated Agent or Aircraft Operator the regulated agent, known consignor, or aircraft operator when securing the consignment could may be entered as a

r eason that the security status was issued, e.g. s creening m ethod codes. If no other reason, i.e.

“ r eceived from” or “ g rounds for exemptions” is indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked

, then this entry cannot be blank. In some cases a
single s creening method may not be sufficient to inspect all types of consignments, therefore

more than one screening methods may be listed.

Grounds for E xemptions

The coded identification (ICAO codes are still under development) indicating why a consignment

is exempted from screening as defined in States’ NCASP State national civil aviation security

programmes could may be entered as a reason that the security status was issued, e.g.

s creening e xemptions codes. If no other reason, i.e. “ r eceived from” or “ s creening m ethod” is
indicated and the consolidation box is not ticked then this entry cannot be blank.

Specify O ther S creening M ethod (s)

If the code entered in Box 9 Screening Method indicat es that any other means were applied then

text specifying th e other means used must be entered.

Security status issued by

If the consolidation box is not ticked then the individual of the K nown Consignor Regulated
Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator who

issued the security status must be identified by name or employee number.

Security Status i ssued on If the consolidation box is not ticked then the exact date and time when the security status was
issued by the regulated agent, known consigno r, or aircraft operator e mployee must be indicated.

R egulated Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) and Identifier
The identifier of any K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft opera tor that accepts custody of the cargo and accepts the
security status originally issued by the K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft
Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator i dentifie d in Box 1 must be
entered. This entry would confirm that the cargo has remained secure and would follow any other

entries for other K nown Consignor Regulated Agent, or Aircraft Operator regulated agent, known consignor or aircraft operator that ha ve also accepted the original security s tatus

.

A dditional security information Any additional security information that may be required by an ICAO Member State, e.g. any
national regulation applicable to the responsibilities in case of in the event of a false declaration,
or any applicable emergency amendment

. A signature of the responsible person initially issuing a
hardcopy consignment security declaration set out in box 1 should be inserted when the supply
chain is paper based.CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 11 of 15

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ B ’ ‘ A p p e n d i x A ’

C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identifier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) Unique Consignment Identifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn)

Content Contents of Consignment

 Consolidati on

Origin Destination Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

Security Status Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Received from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds for Exemption

(codes)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Security Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party E ntity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and Identifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party )

Additional Security Information



### 15 12CSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 12 of 15

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A T I C E 1 6 3 0

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ C ’

C o n s i g n m e n t S e c u r i t y D e c l a r a t i o n

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) &

and Identifier (of the regulated party issuing the security
status) GB/RA/001

- 0110213 Unique Consignment Identifier

(if AWB format is nnn

- nnnnnnnn)
12 5

- 12345675

Content Contents of Consignment

 Consolidation

Origin

EDI Destination

LIT Transfer /Transit/ Transfer points (if known)

LHR, JFK

Security Status

SPX Reasons (that the security status was issued ) for issuing the Security Status

Receive d from

(codes) Screening Method

(codes) Grounds for Exemption

(codes)

Specify Other Screening Method (s) (if applicable)

Security Status Issued by

Name of Person or Employee ID ................................... Security Status Issued on

Date (ddmmmyy) ....... Time (tttt) ....

Regulated Party Entity Category ( KC, RA or AO ) & and Identifier

(of any regulated party who has accepted the security status given to a consignment by another regulated party ) GB/RA/002

- 022/0215

US/RA/003

- 033/0316

Additional S ecurity InformationCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 13 of 15

RECOMMENDED PRATICE 1630

A t t a c h m e n t ‘ D ’

Message Completion Technical Instructions

IATA EDI messages, e.g. Cargo

- IMP or Cargo

- XML, can be used to exchange the required security information for a consignment.

For th e purpose of these instructions, it is the IATA Cargo Interchange Procedures (Cargo

- IMP) Air Waybill Data (FWB) message used as the reference point.

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Identifier Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (ISS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (RA and ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and R egulatory Control Information

ISS

- the regulated agent issuing the security status

OCI/GB/ISS/RA/001

- 011

///ED/0213

Unique Consignment Identifier

Ref. 2.1 AWB Identification

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Content s of the consignment

Ref. 12.11 Goods D escription or Ref. 12.12 Consolidation

/NC/CONSOLIDATION

Origin Ref. 2.2.1 Airport/City Code (of Origin)

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Destination Ref. 2.2.2 Airport/City Code (of Destination)

125

- 12345675LHRJFK/T1K40.0

Transit/ Transfer Transfer /Transit points Ref. 4.2.2 Airport/City Code and 4.3.2 Airport/City Code

RTG/JFKII

Security Status Ref. 25. Special Handling Details

SPH/SPXCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 14 of 15

Received from

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular

Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (ISS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (KC + ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information:

OCI/GB//KC/001

- 011

///ED/021 3

Specify Other Screening Method (s)

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SM) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulat ory Control Information

///SM/RES

Grounds for Exemptions

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (L) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///L/DIPL

Other Screening Method(s) Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SM) +

Ref. 2 9.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SM/AOM

- SPECIFY ANY OTHER MEANS

Security status issued by

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regu latory Control Information Identifier (SN) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SN/JOHNNY WALKER

Security Status issued on

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular

R ef. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (SD) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///SD/05MAR131200

Regulated Party Entity Category (KC, RA or AO) & and Identifier

Ref. 29 Oth er Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.3 ISO Country Code + Ref. 29.5 Information Identifier (OSS) + Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (RA and ED) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary C ustoms, Security and Regulatory Control InformationCSC Mail Vote (S0 7 6 ) Page 15 of 15

OSS

- the regulated agent accepting the security status given by another regulated agent

OCI/GB/ISS/RA/001

- 011

///ED/0213

/US/OSS/RA/002

- 022

///ED/0213

Additional security information

Ref. 29 Other Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information in particular Ref. 29.7 Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information Identifier (ST) + Ref. 29.9 Supplementary Customs, Security and Regulatory Control Information

///ST/THIS MASTER AIR WAYBI LL CONTAINS NO

///ST/1. FREIGHT FROM THAT COUNTRY

///ST/2. TONER CARTRIDGE GREATER THAN 550

///ST/ GRAMS TRANSFERRING THIS COUNTRY