alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 386

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ CHRISTOPHER MARTINEZ AND ALL OCCUPANTS A ppellants ,

v.
ANNA RODRIGUEZ, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from County Court at Law No

. 5 of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Appellant s filed a notice of appeal on September 4, 2020 . On September 8, 20 20

, the Court notified appellant s the notice of appeal was not in compliance with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.1, 9.5, 25.1(d)(1), and 25.1(d)(4)

. To date, the appellant s have neither responded

nor cured the defects. On October 26, 2020 the court sent notice regarding the clerk’s2 record to appellants ’ last known address; however, the notice was returned undeliverable

. The Court has sent other correspondence to appellant s , which ha s also been returned as

undeliverable and unable to forward

. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b) requires unrepresented parties to sign

any document filed and "give the party's mailing address, telephone number, and fax

number, if any." See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.1(b). Appellant s ha ve neither provided this court

with a forwarding address nor taken any other action to prosecute this appeal.

Furthermore , R ule 42.3 permits an appellate court, on its own initiative after giving

ten days' notice to all parties, to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution or for failure

to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules. See id. 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, We

DISMISS the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3.

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice

Delivered and filed this the 10th day of Dece mber, 2020.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-62387 on Form S-3 and in Registration Statements Nos. 333-01587,
33-58065, 33-51994 and 33-29662 of DAKA International, Inc. all on Form S-8 
of our report dated September 6, 1996 (except for Note 5 as to which the date
is October 15, 1996), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DAKA
International, Inc. for the period ended June 29, 1996.



Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts

October 15, 1996
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6558]


In the Matter of the Review of the Designations of United Self-
Defense Forces of Colombia and Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, as 
Foreign Terrorist Organizations pursuant to Section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Records assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2003 re-designations of the aforementioned organizations as foreign 
terrorist organizations have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designations and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designations of the 
aforementioned organizations as foreign terrorist organizations, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 16, 2009.
James B Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-6425 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
Tom BURKE, Appellant, v. Carmen MCHENRY and Jacob McHenry, Respondents.

WD 80589

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: March 13, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 1, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018

Gary M. Steinman, Gladstone, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Jennifer M. Snider, Platte City, MO, Attorney for Respondents.

Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Victor C. Howard and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Tom Burke appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Platte County, Missouri, quieting title to certain real estate in favor of Respondents Carmen and Jacob McHenry. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Burke argues that the circuit court erred in quieting title to the real estate in favor of the McHenrys because the judgment is against the weight of the evidence and incorrectly applies the law. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Thomas W. Jasper, Chief Executive Officer of Primus Guaranty,Ltd. certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of Primus Guaranty, Ltd.;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)    Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)    (Paragraph omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986).

c)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)    Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2005

|  |           |                                                                          |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | By:  | /s/ Thomas W. JasperName: Thomas W. Jasper Title: Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----
Rayonier 2008 Performance Share Award Program


 Exhibit 10.2 
 Rayonier 
 2008 Performance Share Award Program 
 The number of shares to which a participant could become entitled under the 2008 Performance Share Award Program
(the “Program”) can range from 25% to a maximum of 175% of the Target Award depending on Rayonier’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance for the three-year Performance Period of January 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2010, as compared to the TSR performance of the designated peer group companies for the same period. There will be no payout if results fall below the 4th Quintile performance threshold. 
  

	•	 	 TSR is defined as stock price appreciation plus the reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis. For purposes of performance measurement, TSR shall be the final
reported figure as may be adjusted by the Committee for unusual items to avoid distortion in the operation of the Program. 


  

	•	 	 TSR over the 3-year period will be calculated by measuring the value of a hypothetical $100 investment in Rayonier shares as compared to an equal investment in each
of the peer group companies. 


  

	•	 	 TSR calculations of stock price appreciation will be the average of the closing prices of Rayonier common shares and that of each of the peer group companies for
the 20 trading days preceding the starting and ending dates of the Performance Period. 


 The final number of shares in an Award will be
determined as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 The TSR performance of Rayonier and the peer group companies will be calculated and Rayonier’s relative performance, on a percentile basis, is determined.



  

	 	•	 	 The payout percentage of Target Award based on Rayonier’s percentile TSR performance against the peer group companies will be calculated per the following
table: 


  

			
	 Percentile Rank
	  	 Award (Expressed As Percent of Target Award)

	80th and Above	  	175%
	51st – 79th	  	100%, plus 2.5% for each incremental percentile position over the 50th
percentile
	50th	  	100%
	21st – 49th	  	25%, plus 2.5% for each incremental percentile position over the 20th
percentile
	20th	  	25%
	Below 20th	  	0%

  

	•	 	 Payment, if any, is to be made in Rayonier Common Shares, and may be offset, to the extent allowed under applicable regulations, by the number of shares equal in
value to the amount needed to cover associated tax liabilities. 


  

	•	 	 Payment will be made as soon as practicable following the completion of the Performance Period. 


  

	•	 	 Target awards will be prorated in cases of retirement, death, or disability in accordance with Plan provisions. 


  

 1 







 2008 
 Performance Share Award Program 
 (January 1, 2008 – December 31, 2010) 
 Peer Group Companies 
 Abitibi/Bowater 
 Buckeye Technologies 
 Deltic Timber 
 Sappi 
 International Paper 
 Cousins Properties 
 Mead/Westvaco 
 Neenah Paper 
 TimberWest 
 Plum Creek 
 Potlatch Corporation 
 St. Joe Company 
 Tembec 
 Temple Inland 
 Weyerhaeuser 
  

 2
George E. JOSEPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 106317

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.

Filed: April 16, 2019

Alexandria Shah, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Office B/Area 68, St. Louis, MO 63101, For appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Angela T. Quigless, J., and Nicole Colbert-Botchway, Sp. J.

*705*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

George E. Joseph ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,033]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 29, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of all workers at The Worthington Steel Company of Kentucky, LLC, Louisville, Kentucky.

The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6519 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 75198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30521]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given that 4 meetings of the 
Humanities Panel will be held during January, 2013 as follows. The 
purpose of the meetings is for panel review, discussion, evaluation, 
and recommendation of applications for financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
951-960, as amended).

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for meeting dates.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Library of Congress, Thomas 
Jefferson Building, 10 First St. SE., African & Middle Eastern Reading 
Room (LJ-220), Washington, DC 20540, or as otherwise indicated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management 
Officer, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Room, 529, Washington, DC 20506, 
or call (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the National 
Endowment for the Humanities' TDD terminal at (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Meetings

    1. Date: January 17, 2013.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Location: WissenschaftsForum Berlin, Markgrafenstra[szlig]e 37, 
10117 Berlin, Germany.
    This meeting will discuss applications for the NEH/DFG
    Bilateral Digital Humanities Program, submitted to the Office of 
Digital Humanities.
    2. Date: January 25, 2013.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    This meeting will discuss applications for Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the Division of Research Programs.
    3. Date: January 29, 2013.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    This meeting will discuss applications for the Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the Division of Research Programs.
    4. Date: January 31, 2013.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    This meeting will discuss applications for Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the Division of Research Programs.
    Because these meetings will include review of personal and/or 
proprietary financial and commercial information given in confidence to 
the agency by grant applicants, the meetings will be closed to the 
public pursuant to sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6) of Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. I have made this determination pursuant to the 
authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close 
Advisory Committee Meetings dated July 19, 1993.

    Dated: December 13, 2012.
Lisette Voyatzis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-30521 Filed 12-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge: (a)
     the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(b)
     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and theresults of operations of the Fund for such period.
  Date: August 9, 2010 /s/ Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Patrick M. SYMINGTON, Appellant.

WD 79872

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: June 12, 2018

Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent

Ellen H. Flottman, for Appellant

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Symington appeals his conviction following bench trial in Buchanan County for enticement of a child. He presents three points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. Second, he argues the trial court erred in admitting propensity evidence. Finally, Symington says the trial court erred in admitting Facebook messages without a foundation. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Stuart B. Brown    
|                  |  |  |  | Stuart B. Brown        
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA VI D PRE NA TT , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. G . W . W I LLI A M S CO . , db aSI ERRA R O B L E S A P T S .; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 15009 D . C . N o. C V - 06- 01633- GE B /DA D ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G ar l and E . B urr e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D a vi d P r e na ttappe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha thi s c ons t i tut i ona l r i ght s w e r e vi ol a t e d by s ta te c o u rt e v ic tio n p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . 

# FI LED JU N 08 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 15009 2 W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is m is s a l u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) . B arr e n v . H arr i ngton , 1 5 2 F .3 d1 1 9 3 , 1 1 9 4 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ) ( o r d e r ) . W e a ff i rm for the re as on s s t at ed i n the di stri ctcourt ’ s orderof di sm i ss al e nt e r e d on D e c e m be r3, 2007, w hi c h a dopt e d the m a gi s tr a t e j udge ’ s f i ndi ngs and r e c o m m e n d a tio n s e n te r e do n N o v e m b e r6 , 2 0 0 7 . P r e na tt ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons ar e una va i l i ng. AF F I RME D.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Reed J. Killion, President ofthe Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

•                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

•                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May  13, 2005 | By:    |  /s/  Reed J. Killion        |   |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                |   |  Reed  J. Killion, President |

 

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and will beretained by Uni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report or as aseparate disclosure document.*

 

1

----