alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   December 9, 2008
    /s/ Peter A. EdisonPeter A. EdisonChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer

and President 
Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32(a)

ENERGY FUTURE COMPETITIVE HOLDINGS COMPANY

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

The undersigned, John F. Young, President and Chief Executive of Energy Future
Competitive Holdings Company (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 5th day of March, 2009.



/s/ JOHN F. YOUNGName:

John F. YoungTitle:

President and Chief Executive


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future
Competitive Holdings Company and will be retained by Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Earl J. Lauria, Jr., Respondent, v Anthony McKee et al., Appellants.

[719 NYS2d 273]

In a purported proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a resolution of the Town Board of Beekman dated January 3, 2000, which scheduled the regular meetings of the Town Board for the first and third Mondays of each month, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillary, J.), dated April 4, 2000, which, *inter alia,*granted the petition and annulled the resolution.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed *510from, on the law, with costs, the purported proceeding is converted to an action for a judgment declaring that the resolution of the Town Board of Beekman dated January 3, 2000, is invalid, and it is declared that the January 3, 2000, resolution is lawful and valid.

The petitioner, a member of the Republican party, has been a member of the Town Board of Beekman (hereinafter the Board) since January 1998. He alleged that for the 10 years preceding his election, the Board held its regular meetings on the first and third Tuesday nights of each month. Democratic officials, however, gained control of the Board following the November 1999 election, and thereafter a majority of the Board voted to hold the regular meetings on the first and third Monday nights of each month, ostensibly to avoid a conflict with school board meetings. The petitioner, who attends a college class on Monday nights, commenced this proceeding, alleging, *inter alia,*that the Board acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in enacting the resolution rescheduling its meetings, as there was no conflict with school board meetings on Tuesdays. The Supreme Court granted the petition and annulled the resolution. We reverse.

The resolution rescheduling the regular meetings of the Board was a purely legislative act which is not reviewable in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 *(see, Matter of Nassau Shores Civic Assn. v Colby,*118 AD2d 782; *Matter of Swanick v Erie County Legislature, 103*AD2d 1036). The petitioner, a minority party member of a legislative body, may not seek judicial review of an allegedly partisan, legislative act by claiming that the act is arbitrary and capricious. To hold otherwise would raise potentially troublesome issues implicating infringements on constitutional principles of separation of power. Rather, the appropriate procedural vehicle for reviewing such an enactment is an action for a declaratory judgment. Since personal jurisdiction was obtained over all of the necessary parties, we hereby convert the proceeding to an action for declaratory relief *(see, Matter of Nassau Shores Civic Assn. v Colby, supra).*However, the petitioner is not entitled to a declaration that the Board acted improperly merely because he finds the Board’s determination to reschedule its regular meetings inconvenient. Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.
[No. 30602-6-II.

Division Two.

April 27, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Brian Michael Soiseth, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 03-8-00080-3, William G. Knebes, J. Pro Tern., entered July 7, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Morgan, J.
#### America Hensley *v.*Grover C. Broadwater *et al.*

(No. 6778)

Submitted February 10, 1931.

Decided February 17, 1931.

*Harper*& *Baker,*for appellant.

*Harold A. Ritz, Raymond Dodson,*and *B. J. Pettigrew,*for appellees.

Hatcher, Judge:

This is a suit for partition by sale of .the oil and gas under a tract of 75 acres. The cause was submitted to the court on the bill and two separate answers with their exhibits, to which the plaintiff replied generally. The court dismissed the bill and granted certain affirmative relief to the defendants.

■ The answers alleged and the exhibits proved that one M. T. Ogden was a necessary party to the proceeding. The plaintiff failed to make him a party. This was error calling for reversal. *Green*v. *Coal Co.,*109 W. Va. 446, and cases cited therein. An affirmative defense was alleged, and it was *135asserted that a certain act should be done; but there was no prayer for affirmative relief. The granting of such relief was improper. *Goff*v. *Price,*42 W. Va. 384. The court took the view that the allegations of affirmative defense required a special reply in writing. An affirmative defense is ordinarily met by an amended bill. *Gay*v. *Gibson,*85 W. Va. 226. It is only when, in connection with an affirmative defense, affirmative relief is prayed for, that a special reply in writing is requisite. Code 1923, chapter 125, section 35; *Harrison*v. *Brewster,*38 W. Va. 294. The court construed a deed merely upon certain allegations in the bill and answers, the deed not being filed as an exhibit. No reason appears why this deed or a copy thereof should not have been before the court. The construction made is not consistent with the plain language alleged. Therefore, it would seem advisable, upon a further hearing of the cause, that this instrument should be filed, so that it may appear whether the construction is warranted.

As the proceeding is reversed for lack of a proper party, we refrain from comment upon the merits of the cause.

*Reversed and remanded.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7514
SAMUEL WAYNE GUY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN; LYNN PHILLIPS; PHYLLIS ELLIOTT; W. R. BARKER; J. G. BULLOCK; CLIFTON DAVENPORT; PAM MILLER; OFFICER AUTRY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-616-BR) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Wayne Guy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Guy v. Freeman , No. CA-95-616-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 1995). We deny Guy's motion for joinder of this case with another appeal and his motion for "Medical Emergency T.R.O." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
S erved: July 8 , 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### COMPASS AIRLINES

, LLC

-----------------------------------------------------------



### NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On June 25

, 2014

, Compass Airlines

, LLC

. ( “ Compass ”)

, a U.S

. certificated air carrier, 1 request ed that

the Department regist e r the trade name “Delta Shuttle ” for use in certain of its air transportation

operations

.

Part 215 (14 CFR § 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to use an

alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. T he rule further states that the

Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air carriers

of the proposed use of the name. In this case, Compass states it has been authorized by Delta Airlines,

Inc. (“Delta ”), to use the Delta Shuttle trade name in conjunction with its code shar ing relationship with

Delta and that the only similarly named air carriers also conduct business using the same trade name

pursuant to code

- sharing arrangements with Delta.

Since Com pass has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the

trade name “ Delta Shuttle ” for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C. , July 8 , 2014

.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http:// www.regulations.gov

1 Compass’ interstate certifica te was last reissued by Order 2007

- 4

- 28, on April 30 , 1998.Attachment A

SE RVICE LIST FOR COMPASS AIRLINES, LLC

LISA A HARIG

COUNSEL FOR

COMPASS AIRLINES LLC

MCBREEN & KOPKO

1501 LEE HIGHWAY SUITE 180

ARLINGTON VA 22209 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT

FAA/AGC

- 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

chris.walker@delta.com MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGER

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael A. Gerlich,
Chief Financial Officer of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: May 11, 2009



/s/ MICHAEL A. GERLICHMichael A. GerlichChief Financial Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 296 

Expressing support for the designation of April 13, 2023, as 

‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2023 

Ms. STEVENS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 13, 2023, 

as ‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

Whereas remanufacturing is a comprehensive and rigorous 

industrial process by which a previously sold, leased, 

used, worn, remanufactured, or nonfunctional product or 

part is returned to a like-new, same-as-when-new, or better-than-when-new condition, from both a quality and 

performance perspective, through a controlled, reproducible, and sustainable process; 

Whereas a 2012 United States International Trade Commission (ITC) report found that remanufacturers support at 

least 180,000 full-time jobs in the United States, and the 

ITC report states that production of remanufactured 

goods in the United States increased by 15 percent from 

2009 to 2011 and exports totaled $11.2 billion annually; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 296 IH 

Whereas remanufacturing has been recognized by leading 

universities, research institutions, and manufacturers in 

the United States as good for the environment for its 

ability to divert end-of-life products from landfills; 

Whereas, by encouraging businesses, State agencies, nonprofit organizations, schools, and individuals to celebrate 

‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’ on April 13, 2023, we can further promote remanufacturing as environmentally friendly and economically smart; and 

Whereas, to focus the attention of the United States on the 

benefits of remanufacturing, businesses, educational institutions, and nonprofit organizations have joined together 

to celebrate ‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’ and are encouraging their colleagues, friends and families, and their 

communities to learn more about the benefits of remanufactured products: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11616-11617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5768]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request; Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Form 12b-25, OMB Control No. 3235-0058, SEC File No. 270-71.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget a request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    The purpose of Form 12b-25 (17 CFR 240.12b-25) is to provide notice 
to the Commission and the marketplace that a

[[Page 11617]]

public company will be unable to timely file a required periodic or 
transition report pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 
U.S.C. 78a et seq.) and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 
80a et seq.). If all the filing conditions of the form are met, the 
company is granted an automatic filing extension. The information 
required is filed on occasion and is mandatory. All information is 
available to the public for review. Publicly held companies file Form 
12b-25. Approximately 7,799 registrants file Form 12b-25 and it takes 
approximately 2.5 hours per response for a total of 19,498 burden 
hours.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503; and an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#75261d1412001301142a341d181011351a18175b101a055b121a03"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d586bdb4b2a0b3a1b48a94bdb8b0b195bab8b7fbb0baa5fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, 
Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6b6b4a7b9ab878f8a84899ea6958385c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c49496859b89a5ada8a6abbc84b7a1a7eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: March 11, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-5768 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
exv10w15






Exhibit 10.15




AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is effective as of February 4, 2010 and amends the July 2,
2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and between FIDELITY NATIONAL
FINANCIAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and BRENT B. BICKETT (the “Employee”) as
follows:



     1. Excise Taxes. Section 10 of the Agreement is replaced in its entirety with
the following:




“Excise Taxes. If any payments or benefits paid or provided or to be paid
or provided to the Employee or for Employee’s benefit pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement or otherwise in connection with, or arising out of, employment with the
Company or its subsidiaries or the termination thereof (a “Payment” and,
collectively, the “Payments”) would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section
4999 of the Code (the “Excise Tax”), then Employee may elect for such Payments to be
reduced to one dollar less than the amount that would constitute a “parachute
payment” under Section 280G of the Code (the “Scaled Back Amount”). Any such
election must be in writing and delivered to the Company within thirty (30) days
after the Date of Termination. If Employee does not elect to have Payments reduced
to the Scaled Back Amount, Employee shall be responsible for payment of any Excise
Tax resulting from the Payments and Employee shall not be entitled to a gross-up
payment under this Agreement or any other for such Excise Tax. If the Payments are
to be reduced, they shall be reduced in the following order of priority: (i) first
from cash compensation, (ii) next from equity compensation, then (iii) pro-rata
among all remaining Payments and benefits. To the extent there is a question as to
which Payments within any of the foregoing categories are to be reduced first, the
Payments that will produce the greatest present value reduction in the Payments with
the least reduction in economic value provided to Employee shall be reduced first.”



     2. Definitions and Conflicts. All terms not specifically defined in this Amendment
shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the terms of
this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall control.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date
first set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Michael L. Gravelle 	 
	 	 	Its: 	Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and
Corporate Secretary 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	BRENT B. BICKETT

 	 
	 	/S/
Brent B. Bickett 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 




- 1 -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

# AGENCY:

U.S. Geological Survey.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Geological Survey published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 9, 2009, regarding increased prices for USGS primary series quadrangles, thematic maps, National Earthquake Information Center maps, and large format and poster maps. The document contained incorrect dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kip McCarty, Geographic Information Office, (303) 202-4619 or by e-mail at                         *kmccarty@usgs.gov.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 9, 2009, in FR Doc. E9-2609, on page 6416, in the second column, correct the                         **DATES**                         caption to read:                    

# DATES:

                        The price increase will be effective March 16, 2009. All map orders received by or postmarked before March 16, 2009 will be subject to the current price. The U.S. Geological Survey Business Partners have received a 30-day advance notification of the impending price increase. The revised prices will be listed at                         *http://ask.usgs.gov/​prices/​faqs_​prices_​usgs_​products.html*, which supersedes all pricing notices previously published.                    

Dated: March 13, 2009

Michael P. McDermott,

Acting Chief, Science Information and Education Office.

 [FR Doc. E9-5971 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4311-AM-P