Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revisions before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 13-BG-545

IN RE ELLIS S. FRISON, JR., RESPONDENT.

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

(Bar Registration No. 478092)

On Report and Recommendation

of the Board on Professional Responsibility

(BDN 538-08)

(Submitted April 3, 2014 Decided April 24, 2014)

Before GLICKMAN and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, and REID, Senior 

Judge.

PER CURIAM: Respondent Ellis S. Frison, Jr. has been a member of the Bar 

of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals since August 8, 2002. The Board on 

Professional Responsibility has found by substantial evidence that respondent 

violated District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (a), 1.1 (b), 1.3

(b)(1), 1.3 (b)(2), 1.4 (a), 1.4 (b), 1.6 (a), 1.6 (e)(5), 1.16 (d), 3.1, 3.2 (a), 3.3 (a)(1), 

3.3 (a)(4), 3.4 (b), 3.4 (c), 4.4 (a), 8.1 (a), 8.1 (b), 8.4 (c) and 8.4 (d) in connection 

with his representation of Ronda Nunnally, and that he also violated Rules 3.1, 3.3 
2

(a)(1), 3.4 (b), 8.1 (a), 8.4 (c) and 8.4 (d) in connection with his representation of 

Tenedia Davis and her minor daughter. 

The Board accepted the Hearing Committee’s findings that respondent 

represented Ms. Nunnally in an employment discrimination suit from September 

12, 2005, until she discharged him on November 28, 2008. In connection with that 

representation, respondent filed several frivolous and inflammatory motions, failed 

to appear at a deposition of an important witness who was hostile to Ms. Nunnally, 

neglected to file certain motions which effectively prevented Ms. Nunnally from 

presenting evidence for her retaliation claims, introduced Ms. Nunnally’s 

confidential medical records into the public record, and sought and received a six 

month postponement of Ms. Nunnally’s trial without her consent. 

After Ms. Nunnally discharged respondent on November 28, 2008, he 

threatened her and refused to release her case file to her. She then filed a 

complaint against respondent with Bar Counsel and initiated an arbitration claim 

before the Attorney/Client Arbitration Board (“ACAB”) seeking repayment of 

some of the fees she had paid him. In response, respondent submitted to Bar 

Counsel and ACAB inconsistent bills that he had never given Ms. Nunnally and 

that inflated what she owed him according to their initial fee agreement. After 
3

ACAB entered an award to Ms. Nunnally of $11,000 against respondent, he filed a 

civil suit against her in Superior Court on the basis of the same falsified billing 

records that ACAB had rejected. Respondent submitted similar falsified billing 

records to the Bankruptcy Court, where he filed another claim against Ms. 

Nunnally. Respondent repeatedly submitted Ms. Nunnally’s confidential medical 

records subject to attorney-client privilege into the public records in these and 

other proceedings.

Respondent also represented Tenedia Davis and her minor daughter in a 

personal injury action. Because respondent failed to identify any fact witnesses in 

the joint pretrial statement, he was unable to put any fact witnesses on at trial to 

establish that the defendant had caused Ms. Davis’s daughter’s injuries, and the 

court entered judgment as a matter of law for the defendant. On appeal, 

respondent submitted a fabricated joint pretrial statement that included fact 

witnesses, and told this court at oral argument that he had sent the fabricated 

document to opposing counsel prior to trial. 

Having accepted these findings and concluded that they provide substantial 

evidence that respondent violated the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct listed 

above, the Board recommends that respondent be disbarred, and that reinstatement 
4

will be conditioned on proof that respondent has fully paid the $11,000 (ACAB) 

award in Ms. Nunnally’s favor, plus interest at the legal rate beginning to accrue as 

of August 3, 2009. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has taken exception to the 

Report or the Recommendation.1

Pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 9 (h)(2), “if no exceptions are filed to the 

Board’s report, the Court will enter an order imposing the discipline recommended 

by the Board upon the expiration of the time permitted for filing exceptions.” 

ORDERED that Ellis S. Frison, Jr., is disbarred from the District of 

Columbia Bar, effective as of the date of this order. For purposes of reinstatement, 

the period of respondent’s disbarment shall run from the date on which he files the 

affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g). 

 

1

If for any reason any payment has been made on this award from the D.C. 

Bar Clients’ Security Fund, reinstatement should be conditioned on respondent’s 

reimbursing the Security Fund for the full amount it has paid.
5

Further ORDERED that as a condition of reinstatement, respondent must 

prove that he has fully paid the $11,000 ACAB arbitration award rendered in Ms. 

Nunnally’s favor, plus interest at the legal rate on that amount as of August 3, 

2009. 

So ordered.