alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 9696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 22, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or 
404-338-7185.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Wednesday, April 22, 2009, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via 
telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan 
Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-
1227 or 404-338-7185 or write TAP Office, Stop 211-D, 401 West 
Peachtree Street, NW., Atlanta, GA, 30308-3520, or contact us at the 
Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 26, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-4663 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Joint Venture Under Tip Award No. 70NANB9H9007

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 2, 2009, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act'') Joint Venture under TIP 
Award No. 70NANB9H9007 (``70NANB9H9007'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the 
venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Mistras Group Inc. DEA Physical Acoustics 
Corporation, Princeton Junction, NJ; University of Miami, Coral Gables, 
FL; University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; and Virginia 
Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
    The general area of 70NANB9H9007's planned activity is to perform 
cooperative research for developing a self-powered wireless sensor 
network for structural bridge health prognosis.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-6378 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE
Exhibit 10.44



 Exhibit 10.44 
 Dominion Resources, Inc. 
 Agreement Regarding
Additional Credited Years of Service 
 for Retirement Benefit Purposes 
 The executive officer shown below has an agreement with Dominion Resources, Inc., the effect of which will be to provide him with a
supplemental retirement benefit and additional retirement life insurance based on additional years of credited service, contingent upon the executive officer’s attaining the age of 65 and remaining in the employ of Dominion Resources or one of
its subsidiaries as follows: 
 James F. Stutts 
  

			
	Actual Service at Age 65	  	12 years
		
	Credited Service at Age 65	  	20 years

 The monthly
supplemental retirement benefit payable to the executive officer shall be paid from the Retirement Benefit Plan Trust and/or the general corporate assets of Dominion Resources. 
  

					
	 	 	 	 	For Dominion Resources, INC.
			
	
 



	 		 	
 




	James F. Stutts	 		 	Thos E. Capps
			
	 9/22/97
	 		 	 9/12/97

	Date	 		 	Date

 File: stutts1 
 8/18/97
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TierOne Corporation (Company), hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               September 30, 2008 (Report) fully complies with the
requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  November 7, 2008 | By:  /s/ Gilbert G. Lundstrom        
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                        | Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of the
|                        | Board and Chief Executive Officer
#### Robert Hager *v.*State Compensation Commissioner *et al.*

(No. 7423)

Submitted January 11, 1933.

Decided January 17, 1933.

*Ohauncey Brotuning,*for appellant.

*H. B. Lee,*Attorney General, and *Ii. Dennis Steed,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

Hatcher, Judge.-

Robert Hager applied for compensation for an injury which he described as follows: 1 ‘ Growth near base of thumb causing thumb to pull down in palmer surface.” The commissioner denied the claim and Hager appealed.

The claimant was a motorman. He quit work because of an attack of acute ileo-eolitis on August 27, 1931. A growth was removed, surgically, from the palm of his hand on September 28th. He returned to work on November 7, 1931. He testified that while at work on June 27, 1931, he bruised the palm of his hand near the base of his thumb; that the bruised place remained sore and after four or five weeks he noticed ‘ ‘ a growth taking place ’ ’ in his hand; that his thumb ‘' started drawing something like five or six weeks after June and *237dr awed along continuously up until it was operated on”, and that it bas remained crooked and stiff ever since — -not being relieved of that condition by the removal of the callous. The growth was described by the operating surgeon as “a hard lump” about the size of the end of the claimant’s thumb, and was attributed to continual bruising over a considerable period of time. Hager returned home the same day the callous was removed. His surgeon said, ‘'In my opinion this operation would not cause any disability except the time lost as a result of the operation”.

Two physicians testified and neither made any reference whatsoever to Hager’s thumb. There is no evidence connecting the condition of the thumb with the bruise of June 27th or with the callous in any manner except the testimony that the two affections were coincident. Coincidence alone, is not sufficient ordinarily to support a recovery. “A single coincidence, however perfect in itself, is seldom or never sufficient as proof.” Burrill on Circumstantial Evidence, 171. The ruling of the commissioner is correct on the evidence which has been presented. But the coincidence here raises the inference that some causal connection probably existed between the bruised palm and the drawn thumb. So, in order that justice may not be thwarted because of insufficient development of the case, we reverse the ruling and remand the claim to the commissioner, in order that the claimant may show by expert testimony the relation, if any, of the one affection to the other. *Bailey*v. Commissioner, 109 W. Va. 324, 154 S. E. 764; *Bowling*v. *Commissioner,*112 W. Va. 604, 166 S. E. 9; *Holland*v. *Commissioner,*112 W. Va. 507, 165 S. E. 675.

*Reversed and remanded.*
#### In the Matter of Kuyuar Robertson, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 891]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. To the extent that petitioner raises a substantial evidence issue herein, we find that the misbehavior *681report, together with the positive results of the urinalysis tests and the hearing testimony, constitute substantial evidence to support the charge of drug use *(see, Matter of Pollard v Duncan,*274 AD2d 720). Contrary to petitioner’s assertions, the evidence sufficiently demonstrated that the drug testing was performed in accordance with applicable procedures and the chain of custody was adequately established *(see,*7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e]; *Matter of Terry v Goord,*272 AD2d 701). We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Century Pacific Tax Credit Housing Fund
II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Essie Safaie, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.


/s/ Essie Safaie
---------------------------------
Essie Safaie
Chief Financial Officer


     8/15/03
----------------------------------
Date
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3080

_____________________________ S EGWAYNE G OLDSON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

October 31, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

W OLF , R OBERTS , and R OWE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Robert David Malove of the Law Office of Robert David Malov e, P.A., Fort Lauderdale
, for Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Steven E. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

August 15, 2016

N o. 04

- 16

- 00415

- CV

Walter Ray SIMPSON , Jr.
, Appellant

v.

AUTO INJURY SOLUTIONS, INC

.,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 03713 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On May 26, 2016 , the trial court signed an order granting appellee Auto Injury Solutions, Inc.’s motion to dismiss under Rule 91 a

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 91A ( “ Dismissal of Baseless Causes of Action”); In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am.

, No. 15

- 0328, 2016 WL 3537206, at *3 (Tex. June 24, 2016) . Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on June 27, 2016 , and a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on July 11 , 201 6

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1, 26.3.

On July 5, 2016

, after the deadline to file the notice of appeal

, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. See generally Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[A] motion for extension of time is necessarily im plied when an appellant acting in good faith files a [notice of appeal] beyond the time allowed by Rule [26.1], but within the fifteen

- day period in which the appellant would be entitled to move to extend the filing deadline under Rule [26.3].” (emphasis

a dded)).

W e ORDER Appellant to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b) (requirements for a motion for extension of time) ; id. R. 42.3(a) (dismissal for want of jurisdiction) . If Appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed. See id. R. 42.3(c) (dismissal for failure to comply with court order).All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending fur ther order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on thi s 15th day of August, 20 16

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
[No. 51604-3-I.

Division One.

April 12, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Dennis J. Clay, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-05295-5, Michael J. Fox, J., entered December 4, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50775 Summary Calendar

CHRISTOPHER L. MCKIVER , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
LINDA GARCIA, Correctional Officer 5; MIRANDA GONZALES, Correctional Officer 4 , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CV

- 478

Before WIENER, DENNIS and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Christoph er L. McKiver, Texas prisoner # 785351, appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)

– (ii) and § 191 5A(b)(1). McKiver’s claim arises from the confiscation of his personal property by prison officials.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 3, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50775 Document: 00514538841 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2018No. 16

- 50775

2 The district court found that McKiver failed to allege a constitutional procedural due process violation because the prison grievance procedure and
state tort law provided a meaningful post

- deprivation remedy for the loss of his property. See Hudson v. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984)

. Affording McKiver’s pro se brief liberal construction, see Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir. 1995), he allege s

— and the record suggests

— that the deprivation may have resulted from established state procedure rather than random and unauthorized action, meaning that a Section 1983 claim could be appropriate. See Zinermon v. Burch , 494 U.S. 113, 115 , 138 ( 1990); Augustine
v. Doe , 740 F.2d 322, 3 27

– 29 (5th Cir. 1984). Because the defendants were not served in the district court, the Texas Attorney General appeared in th is appeal as amicus curiae and filed a letter brief, suggesting that we remand this

case to the district court as the record does not reflect whether the taking was pursuant to an established state procedure or was random and unauthorized

. Accordingly, we VACATE the district court’s dismissal of McKiver’s Section 1983 c omplain t and REMAND for further proceedings

. We express no opinion on the ultimate disposition of the complaint. Case: 16-50775 Document: 00514538841 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2018
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)






I, Richard Aland, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Accelerated Acquisitions V, Inc. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 United States Code 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


2.
The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: June 1, 2011
 
 /s/ Richard AlandRichard AlandChief Executive Officer, PrincipalFinancial and Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS V, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS V, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6552]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Luis Melendez: Master of the Spanish Still Life,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about May 17, 2009, until on or about August 23, 2009; at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art from on or about September 23, 2009, to on or about January 3, 2010; at the Museum of Fine Arts Boston from January 21, 2010, to on or about May 31, 2010; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW. Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: March 12, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-6153 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of EAU Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wade R. Bradley,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





DATE: May
24, 2010





/s/
      Wade R. BradleyWade
      R. BradleyChief
      Executive OfficerEAU
      Technologies, Inc.