alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6559]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF)


National Science Board Committee on Programs and Plans; Sunshine 
Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's Committee on Programs and Plans, 
pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science 
Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the 
scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board 
business and other matters specified, as follows:

Date and Time: Monday, March 30, 2009 at 1 p.m.

Subject Matter: To make recommendations on award actions.

Status: Closed.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the 
National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Please refer to the National Science Board 
Web site (http://www.nsf.gov/nsb) for information or schedule updates, 
or contact: Elizabeth Strickland, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Ann Ferrante,
Writer-Editor.
[FR Doc. E9-6559 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**     Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of North PointeHoldings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 10, 2007              /s/ Brian J. Roney   Brian J. Roney   Chief Financial Officer   
40
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25458]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Senior Executive Service; Performance Review Board; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Designation of Performance Review Board Standing Register; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice in the 
Federal Register on October 8, 2014, (79 FR 60845) listing the names of 
the Performance Review Board Standing Register. This documents amends 
that notice by removing the name of Larry Buttress and adding in its 
place, the name of Suzanne B. Cooper.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 17, 2014.
Tonya M. Mackey,
Director, Office of Executive Resources.
[FR Doc. 2014-25458 Filed 10-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
CHARLESTON.

#### State, by Etc. *v.*Bern Crockett.

Submitted September 5, 1923.

Decided September 11, 1923.

Appeal and *Error*— Order *Sustaining Demurrer and Dismissing Cause Held Appealable and not Reviewable on Certificate; and “Final Order."*

An order sustaining a demurrer to a bill and dismissing tbe cause (plaintiff not desiring to amend) is a final order, and is not reviewable by tbe supreme court by certification of the questions arising on tbe demurrer, under the last clause of sec. 1, chap. 135 of the Code.

Action by the State, by the Prosecuting Attorney of Raleigh County, against Bern Crockett. On certified questions.

*Dismissed.*

*E. T. England,*Attorney General, and *D.*D. *Ashworth,*for plaintiff.

*J. W. Maxwell,*for defendant.

Lively, Judge:

This case is certified to this court, on motion of the circuit-judge, under and by virtue of the latter part of sec. 1, chap. 135 of the Code relating to “Certified Cases.”

The bill or petition was filed on behalf of the State of West Virginia, by the prosecuting attorney of Raleigh county, and prays that an automobile belonging to defendant be declared a public nuisance, and abated as such, and that the same be sold for the benefit of the general school fund under the provisions of sec. 14 chap. 32-A Barnes’ Code as amended by chap. 108 of the Acts of 1919; it being charged in the bill tliar. the automobile was, on the 6th of November, 1922, owned and operated by defendant on the public roads for the purpose of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquors from place 1o place within the State, when he was arrested, a large quantity of intoxicating liquors found in the automobile, the liquor confiscated, and the automobile taken into the possession of the officer making the arrest, in pursuance of the statute. *424The date of the filing of the bill does not appear from the certified record. It was duly sworn to November 25, 1922. Defendant appeared by counsel and demurred to the bill, and the court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the cause. The record does not give the date of the court’s order. The order, after noting the appearance and demurrer of defendant to the bill, and argument of counsel thereon, recites: "and the court, after hearing the argument of counsel thereon, is of opinion that the said demurrer to said bill should be sustained, and the plaintiff relying on its said bill and not desiring to amend the same the above styled cause was dismissed.” The court certified the question of the sufficiency of the bill arising under the demurrer, on February 23, 1923.

The order of the court is final. It sustains the demurrer, and the cause is dismissed. A final order is not reviewable by this court upon joint application of the parties, or by the court’s own motion, under the latter part of section 1 chap. *135*of the Code. *Saffel v. Woodyard,*90 W. Va. 747; 111 S. E. 768; *Gas Company*v. *Shreve,*90 *W.*Va. 277; 110 S. E. 714; *Heater*v. *Lloyd,*85 *W.*Va. 570; 102 S. E. 228; *Marks*v. *Mitchell,*90 W. Va. 702; 111 S. E. 763.

The cause will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction of this court to consider the questions presented to it by this procedure.

*Dismissed.*
#### Board of Education of the District of Fayetteville *et al. v.*Edgar C. Lawson, *Auditor.*

(No. 7479)

Submitted September 18, 1932.

Decided November 18, 1932.

*Simms &*Simms, for relators.

*H. B. Lee,*Attorney General and *B. Dennis Steed,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Lively, Judge:

This is a mandamus proceeding to correct an error made in the state auditor’s office whereby there was an improper apportionment or allocation of the assessed value of the property of the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway among the various counties, magisterial.district, and municipalities through which the railroad extends, for purposes of taxation.

A demurrer to the petition is interposed. There is no answer. Therefore, the facts set up in the petition are taken as true.

The assessment of the railroad property by the Board of Public Works for taxation purposes for the year 1932 was eighty million dollars and the true apportionment of that assessment to Fayetteville magisterial district should have been $1,933,672.00, whereas the clerical force of the auditor’s office erroneously allocated to that district the sum of $1,373,330.00. The auditor makes such apportionment under 11-6-13, Code *611931. Upon complaint to the tax commissioner, the error was discovered, and assuming that the error would be corrected, the tax commissioner advised the district to take into consideration the true sum which should have been originally allocated to it, in laying its levies, and the board of education for that district did so, including in its estimate of taxable property in the district the true amount which should have been allocated. These are the material facts stated in the petition. The petition avers that if the error be not corrected, the board of education will be deprived of the sum of approximately $15,000.00 in its tax revenues.

The error appears to have been occasioned by oversight or inadvertence of the clerical force in the tax commissioner’s office in treating 12.88 miles of railroad track in said magisterial district as *secondary*track, instead of *main,*primary track as it should have been treated and considered. Before 1931, this mileage of track was considered and treated as secondary track, but in that year, it was reported and assessed as primary track, and the allocations made accordingly; but this year, the old error inadvertently crept in resulting in the apportionment complained of.

Petitioner presents a clear legal right to have the error (by which it is injured) corrected. It must be remembered that the facts stated in the petition are not controverted and are taken as true. The correction of the error may create some disturbance in the assessments and tax revenues of other districts in other counties, but consideration of that fact does not outweigh the clear legal right of petitioner. We. perceive no other adequate remedy, and the writ will issue.

*Writ awarded.*
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-1946

LT Case Nos. 2015-CF-003726-AX

 2015-CF-003264-AX

 2021-CF-004142-AX

_____________________________

MICHAEL FITCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.

Anthony Michael Tatti, Judge.

Jessica J. Travis, of DefendBrevard.com, Melbourne, for 

Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. 

Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

October 31, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jacinta Sit, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. on the Form 10-Q/A for the year ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oxford Technologies, Inc.







|                        |  |     |  |                                                              
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 9, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/Jacinta Sit                                               
|                        |  |     |  | Jacinta Sit, President                                       
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 10 (t)

Broadcast Agreement with Radio Difusión y Comunicación



Contrato de Radiodifusión

Entre Radio Difusión y Comunicación, S.A. (en adelante denominado el Emisor), domiciliado en la ciudad de Panamá, Rep. De Panamá por una parte, y por la otra Karma Media Inc., con oficinas corporativas localizadas en 927 S. Azusa Ave. Suite C, City of Industry , California 91748  USA convienen en celebrar el presente CONTRATO DE RADIODIFUSIÓN.



Términos del Contrato.



El Emisor acepta poner al aire el programa de radio llamado El super minuto caliente de Estelle, de 1 minuto, distribuido por Karma Media Inc.. La emisión comenzará antes de la semana 23 de 2004  por un mínimo de 26 semanas consecutivas. Cualquiera de las partes puede concluir este acuerdo por cualquier razón con un aviso previo de 60 días. Este acuerdo es renovable automáticamente a menos que cualquiera de las partes desee cambiar todas o una parte de los términos contenidos en este acuerdo. El Emisor acepta poner al aire El super minuto caliente de Estelle cinco veces a la semana entre las horas 6AM y 12 de la noche. Siempre que estos requerimientos mínimos sean cumplidos, el emisor tendrá el permiso de Karma Media Inc. para poner al aire cada programa.



El Emisor  dara a  Karma Media Inc. 1 minuto de tiempo comercial entre las horas 6AM y 12 de la noche a cambio de cada minuto de programa de El super minuto caliente de Estelle dado al emisor por Karma Media Inc.

Es decir por 5 minutos de programacion por semana de El super minuto caliente de Estelle recibidas de Karma Media Inc. , El Emisor  dara a  Karma Media Inc.  5 minutos de tiempo comercial.



Karma Media Inc. le mandara al emisor comerciales en formato mp3 para ponerlos al aire en el minuto que reciben del Emisor.



Karma Media Inc entregará el programa de El super minuto caliente de Estelle en formato mp3 al emisor.  En caso de que el Emisor considere un programa inutilizable, Karma Media Inc hará todos los esfuerzos correspondientes para reemplazarlo o el Emisorpodrá reemplazarlo con un programa emitido anteriormente.



El Emisoradmite que está estrictamente prohibida la reventa, dar la licencia o canjear El minuto caliente de Estelle a algún otro Emisor o a otra persona no mencionada en este contrato.



En prueba de absoluta conformidad, a continuación firman ambas partes los términos y condiciones de este acuerdo y reconocen que están autorizados a ejecutarlo.



/s/

______________________________________        Fecha:__Panamá, 2 de junio de 2004_____

Emisor





_____________________________________

Fecha:___________________

Karma Media







---
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed November 8, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0220

Lower Tribunal Nos. F16-6834B, F11-19406

________________

Derrick V. Hoskin,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen Cabarga, Judge.

Derrick V. Hoskin, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5589 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5589

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to transfer to United 
States Immigration and Customs Enforcement all functions of the Customs 
      Patrol Officers unit operating on the Tohono O'odham Indian 
                              reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHADOW WOLVES TRANSFER.

    (a) Transfer of Existing Unit.--Not later that 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security 
shall transfer to United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement all 
functions (including the personnel, assets, and liabilities 
attributable to such functions) of the Customs Patrol Officers unit 
operating on the Tohono O'odham Indian reservation (commonly known as 
the ``Shadow Wolves'' unit).
    (b) Establishment of New Units.--The Secretary is authorized to 
establish within United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
additional units of Customs Patrol Officers in accordance with this 
section, as appropriate.
    (c) Duties.--The Customs Patrol Officer unit transferred pursuant 
to subsection (a), and additional units established pursuant to 
subsection (b), shall operate on Indian lands by preventing the entry 
of terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, 
narcotics, and other contraband into the United States.
    (d) Basic Pay for Journeyman Officers.--A Customs Patrol Officer in 
a unit described in this section shall receive equivalent pay as a 
special agent with similar competencies within United States 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement pursuant to the Department of 
Homeland Security's Human Resources Management System established under 
section 841 of the Homeland Security Act (6 U.S.C. 411).
    (e) Supervisors.--Each unit described in this section shall be 
supervised by a Chief Customs Patrol Officer, who shall have the same 
rank as a resident agent-in-charge of the Office of Investigations 
within United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit
32.2








PACIFIC
STATE BANCORP





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements and Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company











Date:
November 6, 2008


/S/ Justin R.
Garner


Justin R.
Garner


Vice
President and


Interim
Chief Financial Officer
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:             November 16,      2009                                      |   | By:  /s/ Guy W.      Harris                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   | Guy      W. Harris, Principal Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   | Senior      Vice President & Chief FinancialOfficer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BMR Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), K.
John Shukur, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BMR Solutions, Inc., and will be retained by BMR Solutions, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 /s/ K. John
      ShukurK.
      John Shukur
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    May
      8, 2008