alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 13, 2021

No. 04-20-00445-CV

Jimmy and Cherly WILLIAMS,

Appellants

v.

GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY and its Officers and Directors,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-2054-CV

The Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ brief is due on January 15, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). Before the due 

date, Appellees filed an opposed motion to extend the brief due date to February 4, 2021.

Appellees’ motion is GRANTED. Appellees’ brief is due on February 4, 2021. 

Appellants’ reply brief will be due twenty days after Appellees’ brief is filed. See id. R. 38.6(c). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**FORM 10-QSB**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

# **Quarter ended March 31,2008**

# ** **

I,Thomas E. Fox, President and of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”)certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The informationin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 15, 2008

 
|   | /s/  Thomas E. Fox                            |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas  E. Fox, President                     |
|   | (principal  financial and accounting officer) |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,880]


America's Business Operations, Dell USA L.P., Round Rock, TX; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 13, 2009 in response to a 
petition on behalf of workers of America's Business Operations, Dell 
USA L.P., Round Rock, Texas.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6517 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5626 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

802 South Carrier Parkway in Grand Prairie, Texas, as the ‘‘Alexander 

McRae Dechman Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2006 

Mr. MARCHANT (for himself, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. 

BRADY of Texas, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. CARTER, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. 

CUELLAR, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. 

GOHMERT, Mr. GONZALEZ, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. HALL, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. HINOJOSA, 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, 

Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. PAUL, Mr. POE, Mr. REYES, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SMITH

of Texas, and Mr. THORNBERRY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 802 South Carrier Parkway in Grand Prairie, 

Texas, as the ‘‘Alexander McRae Dechman Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5626 IH

1 SECTION 1. ALEXANDER MCRAE DECHMAN POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 802 South Carrier Parkway in 

5 Grand Prairie, Texas, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Alexander McRae Dechman Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Alexander McRae 

11 Dechman Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

        JOINT CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
            FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(B)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Protocall Technologies Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bruce
Newman, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 16, 2006


/s/ Bruce Newman
-----------------------------------
Bruce Newman
Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending March 7, 2009

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.).
    The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to 
Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the 
Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. 
Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a 
tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further 
proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2005-22228 and DOT-OST-2009-0058.
    Date Filed: March 3, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 24, 2009.
    Description: Application of Continental Micronesia, Inc. requesting 
a certificate authorizing it to provide scheduled air transportation of 
persons, property and mail between the United States, via intermediate 
points and the open skies countries and beyond.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E9-6611 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Firefish, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Harshawardhan Shetty, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Dated: August 5, 2011
  /s/Harshawardhan Shetty
 Harshawardhan Shetty
 (Principal Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy
Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |     |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Bruce C. Sexton                     
|                       |  |     |  | Bruce C. Sexton, Chief Financial Officer
|                       |  |     |  | of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture    
|                       |  |     |  | and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
IN the INTEREST OF: M.T.S.

No. ED 105918

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: June 12, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 16, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Craig Allan Johnston, Public Defender's Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Glenn Hunt, 920 N. Vandeventer, St. Louis, MO 63108.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

M.T.S. appeals from the Judgment of the juvenile division of the circuit court, denying his motion for judgment of acquittal and sustaining its findings that Juvenile committed first degree tampering, in violation of Section 569.080 RSMo. 20001 ; second degree property damage, in violation of Section 569.120; and felony resisting or interfering with an arrest, stop, or detention, in violation of Section 575.150. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Tassone, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

·                                          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and

·                                          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  |   | May 14, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ James A. Tassone                      |   |
|--------|--------|--------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |         |   |   |   | James A. Tassone, Chief Financial Officer |

 

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and will be retained byUni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.  The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and shall not be deemed  filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.*

----
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 9, 2007
|----------------------



| | /s/Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. OP 20-0569

AARON MICHAEL GRAFFT,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondent’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted an extension of time 

to and including February 6, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 31 2020

12/31/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0569
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

Order 

February 3, 2012 

144544 & (19)(20) 

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 

Respondent-Appellee, 

v SC: 144544 

 COA: 307964 

 MERC: R11 D-034 

GRADUATE EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION/AFT, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

and 

STUDENTS AGAINST GSRA 

UNIONIZATION and MELINDA DAY, 

Proposed Intervenors-Appellants, 

and 

MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Proposed Intervenor-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED. 

 YOUNG, C.J. (concurring). 

 I concur in this Court’s order denying leave to appeal in this matter. The Court of 

Appeals reached the correct result when it dismissed the proposed intervenors’ 

application for lack of jurisdiction, although I believe a different rationale controls this 

matter. 

 The Court of Appeals claimed that MCL 24.301 does not give it jurisdiction to 

hear this matter “because the current proceeding . . . is not a contested case.” Thus, the 

Court of Appeals interpreted MCL 24.301 as allowing interlocutory appeals only during 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 3, 2012 

d0203 

 

2

contested cases. While the proposed intervenors present nonfrivolous arguments 

rejecting that claim, the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction in this particular 

matter even if MCL 24.301 generally allows interlocutory appeals on matters that are not 

contested cases. 

 MCL 24.301 is part of the Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq., 

and provides that “[a] preliminary, procedural or intermediate agency action or ruling is 

not immediately reviewable, except that the court may grant leave for review of such 

action if review of the agency’s final decision or order would not provide an adequate 

remedy” (emphasis added). Another provision of the Administrative Procedures Act,

MCL 24.203(5), expressly defines “court” within the Act as “the circuit court.” 

Accordingly, the interlocutory review provision of MCL 24.301 requires an appellant to 

seek circuit court review of an agency’s action before proceeding to the Court of 

Appeals. Because the proposed intervenors did not do so here, the Court of Appeals 

reached the correct result in dismissing their application for lack of jurisdiction.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Highly Innovative Technologies to Interrupt Transmission of HIV.                     

*Date:*                         April 23-24, 2009.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hilton Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Clayton C Huntley, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program,  Division of Extramural Activities,  National Institutes of Health/NIAID/DHHS,  6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616,  Bethesda, MD 20892-7616,  301-451-2570,                         *chuntley@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation  Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 16, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E9-6200 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[No. 29332-3-II.

Division Two.

May 11, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Samuel Nathan Jones, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 02-8-00637-5, Diane M. Woolard, J., entered September 17, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Morgan, A.C.J., and Houghton, J.
Gormas, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

November , 2014 

Theresa Litsheim < ptlits@gmail.com > 

Tuesday, November 18, 2014 2:03 PM 

EAS (OST) 

ptlits@hotmail.com 

Please keep us connected!! 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, S .E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

/J o7 - C J7- 1'7 ?.5- Cft71 

,i. 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wrangell, and 

Yakutat, Alaska, Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer : 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air 

service to our community. 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major communities of interest, with 

single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access 

the airline's extensive route system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The 

passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this route, provides freight, 

mail and cargo capacity that other carriers simply cannot provide. 

Further, Alaska Airlines aircraft are equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, which 

enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and 

cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the community. 

Simply put, Alaska Airlines' service is critical to the economic well being of our communitv and (IIwe) 

support their application to provide Essential Air Service to Southeast Alaska. 

Even tho this is a copy and paste letter it covers everything prettv well. Please keep us connected! I believe 

Alaska Airlines is ESSENTIAL in keeping us connected and for me as a retail business owner especially. 

Thank you and Best Regards! 

Theresa Litsheim 

Diamante Gift Shoppe 

Petersburg, AK 99833 

1