alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# t])e[aware PAGE 1 

# IJfie 

# :FirstState

I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF "CONESTOGA-ROVERS & 

### ASSOCIATES, INC.", CHANGING ITS NAME FROM "CONESTOGA-ROVERS & 

### ASSOCIATES, INC. " TO "GHD SERVICES INC. ", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE TWENTY-THIRD DAY OF JUNE, A.D. 2015, AT 4:34 O'CLOCK P.M. A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE NEW CASTLE COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS. AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AFORESAID CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT IS THE FIRST DAY OF JULY, A.D. 2015.

3692394 8100 150961403 You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml Jeffrey W. Bullock, Secretary ofState 

### C TION: 2495051 DATE: 06-23-15State ofDelaware Secretazy ofState Division o£Corporations Delivered 04:34PM 06/23/2015 FTLED 04:34PM 06/23/2015 SRV 150961403

- 3692394 FTLE 

### CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF CONESTOGA-ROVERS 

### &ASSOCIATES, INC.

UnderSection 242 ofthe General Corporation Law oftheState of Delaware
The undersigned, Stephen M. Quigley, President ofConestoga-Rovers 

### & Associates, Inc., does hereby certify: 1. The name ofthecorporation is Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"). 2. The Certificate of Incorporation ofthe Corporation was filed by the DepartmentofState ofthe State of Delaware on August 13, 2003. 3. The Certificate of Incorporation ofthe Corporation is hereby amended to change the name ofthe Corporation from Conestoga-Rovers 

### & Associates, Inc. to GHD Services Inc. To effect such amendment: Paragraph "1." ofthe Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: nl. The name ofthe Corporation is GHD Services Inc." 4. The foregoing amendmentofthe Certificate of Incorporation was authorized by the unanimous written consent ofall the directors ofthe Corporation and approved bythe stockholders ofall ofthe issued and outstanding stock ofthe Corporation entitled to vote thereon.

5. The effective date ofthe amendment shall be 

### July 1, 2015.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed this Certificate and affirmed it as true underpenalties ofperjuryon June ll_,2015.
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joshua RAY, Defendant/Appellant.

No. ED 105957

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: February 26, 2019

Christian Lehmberg, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Ray appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon its finding following a court trial convicting him of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and one count of furnishing pornographic materials to a minor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.4
 AMENDED AND RESTATED PLEDGE AGREEMENT
(Holdings)
  RECITALS
      Creation of Security Interest
  Collateral




---



##### 



Companys Obligations
 Payment of Secured Indebtedness
     2




---



##### 



Protection of Security Interest
        3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



Default
  Consequence of Default
  5




---



##### 



Secured Partys Rights and Remedies
  Right to Assign
 Right to Discharge Companys Obligations
 Remedies and Enforcement
    6




---



##### 



Right of Sale
      7




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Representations and Warranties of Company
         8




---



##### 



Mutual Agreements
         9




---



##### 



COMPANY:NORTH POINTE HOLDINGS 
CORPORATION, a Michigan corporationBy:Brian J. RoneyIts: Chief Financial OfficerACCEPTED BY SECURED PARTY:COMERICA BANK, as Agent for the BanksBy:Michael P. StapletonIts:
    
    First Vice President
 10




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A
Raquel HOPPER, Appellant, v. HNB NATIONAL BANK and One Home Realty, Inc., Respondents.

WD 81831

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 2, 2019

Michael Mohlman, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant, Hopper.

Rachel Smith, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Appellant, Hopper.

Michael Waddell, Overland Park, KS, Co-Counsel for Appellant, Hopper.

John Davidson, Overland Park, KS, Counsel for Respondent, HNB National Bank.

Peter Collins, Overland Park, KS, Co-Counsel for Respondent, HNB National Bank.

Jennifer Rose, Lee's Summit, MO, Counsel for Respondent, One Home Realty, Inc.

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

*677**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Ms. Raquel Hopper appeals a Buchanan County Circuit Court judgment sustaining HNB National Bank's motion for summary judgment and One Home Realty, Inc.'s motion to dismiss in this negligence action arising from a personal injury caused by a dog bite. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Pantelis Zachos, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Standard Mining Corp;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  April 14, 2010



/s/ Pantelis Zachos

Pantelis Zachos

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SIMON TIMLICHMAN and SVETLANA TIMLICHMAN,

Appellants,

v.

SILVIA CHETRIT,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1686

[June 23, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Robert W. Lee, Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE21008559.

Josef Timlichman and Edward Armellino of Josef Timlichman Law, 

PLLC, Aventura, for appellants.

Diego E. Traibel, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
32.1
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
   SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Garman Cabinet & Millwork, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
April 13,
2010                                                                      By: /s/ Valerie
Garman
 Valerie
Garman
 President, Chief Executive Officer
In the MATTER OF the CARE AND TREATMENT OF: J.G., Appellant.

No. ED 105367

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: February 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 10, 2018

Nancy A. McKerrow, 1400 Forum Blvd., Suite 1C # 203, Colombia, Missouri 65203, for Appellant.

Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

J.G. appeals the trial court's judgment, after a jury trial, committing him to the custody of the Department of Mental Health under the Sexually Violent Predator Act. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,075]


Senco Products, Inc., Cincinnati, OH; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on February 3, 2009 in response 
to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Senco 
Products, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6293 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
From: Wilson, Erika 

Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 3:19 PM

To: arjun@ieer.org

Cc: Bremer, Kristen; Risley, David; Hackel, Angela

Subject: Web comment on the Clean Power Plan

Hello 

Thank you for your inquiry. In response to the question you submitted to the Clean Power Plan web site 

regarding differences in redispatched electricity:

The difference you reference in your question is attributable to states with "under construction" NGCC 

or IGCC. As explained in Step 3b on page 12 of the Goal Computation TSD at 

http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-06/documents/20140602tsd-goal-computation.pdf, 

"'under construction' is defined as anything that came online in 2013 or that was under construction, 

site prep, or testing by January 8, 2014. The EPA looked at reported data for 2012 and calculated the 

average performance of NGCCs that came online in the past 5 years and observed that 55% was the 

average capacity factor for these units. Therefore, the EPA assumed that a 55% capacity factor would be 

a reasonable representation for the expected generation of "under construction" NGCCs capacity under 

a business as usual scenario. The EPA conservatively designated the generation associated with this 55% 

capacity factor as unavailable for redispatch to reduce CO2 (i.e., not qualifying for building block 2), 

instead, reserving that amount of generation potential to meet other system needs presumed to have 

motivated the construction of the "under construction" NGCCs. Because these sources are nevertheless 

covered under the state emission rate goal, the emissions and generation from this 55% generation are 

added to the "other" category and averaged into the state goal calculation."

Thank you for your interest in the Clean Power Plan. 

Erika Wilson

Clean Air Markets Division

Office of Atmospheric Programs

Office of Air and Radiation

U.S. EPA

202.343.9113

wilson.erika@epa.gov

Submitted on 08/22/2014 2:52PM

Submitted values are:

Name: Arjun Makhijani

Email: arjun@ieer.org

Comments: Question: For some states, such as Virginia and Wyoming, the redispatched total electricity 

is not the same as the 2012 total. But it is the same for most states. Please provide an explanation for 

the cases where the redispatched amount is different from 2012. Thank you.

Web Area: Carbon Pollution Standards
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 300 

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Defense to transmit, 

respectively, to the House of Representatives copies of all documents 

indicating any plans for current or future military assistance to Ukraine 

and documents indicating whether any United States Armed Forces, 

including special operations forces, are currently deployed in Ukraine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2023 

Mr. GAETZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Defense to transmit, respectively, to the House of Representatives copies of all documents indicating any plans 

for current or future military assistance to Ukraine and 

documents indicating whether any United States Armed 

Forces, including special operations forces, are currently 

deployed in Ukraine. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested, and the 

2 Secretary of Defense is directed, to transmit, respectively, 

3 to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days 

4 after the date of the adoption of this resolution, copies 

5 of all documents in the possession of the President or the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 300 IH 

1 Secretary of Defense, respectively, indicating any plans for 

2 current or future military assistance to Ukraine and docu3 ments indicating whether any United States Armed 

4 Forces, including special operations forces, are currently 

5 deployed in Ukraine. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on her knowledge:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
     31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.



Date:  May 10, 2004



                                     /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                     -------------------------
                                     Michelle A. Alexander
                                     Chief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                                                                        |                               |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| DATE:              August 14, 2007 |                                                                                                             | /s/              Brian D. Heinhold |
|                               | Brian                D. HeinholdChief                Financial OfficerEAU                Technologies, Inc. |

----
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Pursuant
to
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Zeynep
Hakimoglu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of ClearOne Communications, Inc.
 
 
 
 Date: 
      September 10, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Zeynep HakimogluZeynep
      HakimogluPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A
signed original of the written statement above required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ClearOne Communications, Inc.
and will be retained by ClearOne Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The   undersigned   executive   officer  of  Minden   Bancorp,   Inc.  (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and that the  information  contained  therein
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                   /s/ Becky T. Harrell
                                   Name: Becky T. Harrell
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: August 16, 2004

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       26
Michael SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 106232

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: December 26, 2018

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Michael Smith (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred because his felony conviction for stealing and five-year sentence were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in *State v. Bazell*, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: March 10, 2016 520665

________________________________ In the Matter of ALFONSO RIZZUTO, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: January 19, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ.

__________ Alfonzo Rizzuto, Duryea, Pennsylvania, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the disciplinary determination has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see-2- 520665

Matter of Rizzuto v Prack, 134 AD3d 1263, 1263 [2015]). McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court