alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Polar Programs (1130).                     

*Date/Time:*                         May 4, 2009, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

May 5, 2009, 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. 

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1235.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Sue LaFratta, Office of Polar Programs (OPP). National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8030.                     

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, programs, and activities on the polar research community, to provide advice to the Director of OPP on issues related to long-range planning.                     

*Agenda:*                         Staff presentations and discussion on opportunities and challenges for polar research, education and infrastructure; strategic planning; and planning for Arctic and Antarctic Committees of Visitors.                     

Dated: March 18, 2009. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-6211 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
TS-AMID10/20/40

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d 

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter 
Attachment #4

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture 

And Processing

TS-AMID10/20/40
The STATE v. ORR.

A17A2096

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

July 23, 2019

Emily Griffin Johnson, Leigh Ellen Patterson, Rome, Luke Anthony Martin, for Appellant.

Benjamin Henry Pierman, Decatur, for Appellee.

Gobeil, Judge.

Following his conviction for family violence battery and cruelty to children in the third degree, Otto Orr filed a motion for a new trial, asserting, inter alia, that the trial court erred when it failed to declare a mistrial after the State impermissibly commented on Orr's pre-arrest silence. The trial court granted Orr's motion, finding that the exclusionary rule articulated by the Supreme Court of Georgia in *Mallory v. State* ,1261 Ga. 625, 409 S.E.2d 839 (1991), overruled on other grounds, *Clark v. State* , 271 Ga. 6, 9-10, 515 S.E.2d 155 (1999), required that Orr receive a new trial. The State appealed, arguing that in light of Georgia's new Evidence Code, *Mallory* and its progeny were no longer good law. We disagreed, noting that in the six years since the new Evidence Code went into effect, our Supreme Court expressly reserved, on at least seven separate occasions, the question of whether *Mallory* remained valid under the new statutory scheme. *State v. Orr* , 345 Ga. App. 74, 77-78, 812 S.E.2d 137 (2018) ( *Orr I* ) (citing cases). Accordingly, we affirmed the grant of Orr's new trial motion. Id. at 79, 812 S.E.2d 137.

The Supreme Court of Georgia granted the State's petition for certiorari and subsequently held that the exclusionary rule set forth in *Mallory* "was abrogated by the new Evidence Code." *State v. Orr* , 305 Ga. 729, 736 (3), 827 S.E.2d 892 (2019) ( *Orr II* ). The Supreme Court therefore vacated our opinion in *Orr I* and remanded the case to this Court for further proceedings consistent with *Orr II**.* Accordingly, we now vacate our earlier decision and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own.

In accordance with the Supreme Court's direction, we vacate the order of the trial court and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and the opinion of our Supreme Court in *Orr II* . Specifically, the trial court should determine: (1) whether evidence of Orr's failure to come forward in this case was admissible under Georgia's current rules of evidence, *513*Orr II* , 305 Ga. at 740 (4) (a), 827 S.E.2d 892 ; and (2) even if otherwise properly admissible, that evidence should have been excluded "under the federal or state constitution, a statute, ... one of the specific exclusionary rules in the new Evidence Code ... [or] under the balancing test set forth in Rule 403." Id. at 742 (4) (b), 827 S.E.2d 892. The trial court should also consider the additional grounds for a new trial set forth in Orr's original and amended motions seeking the same. Id. at 743 (4) (c), 827 S.E.2d 892.

*Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.*

McFadden, P. J., and Coomer, J., concur.

1

Under that rule, the State was strictly prohibited from commenting on either a defendant's pre-arrest silence or the defendant's failure to come forward to police voluntarily. *Mallory* , 261 Ga. at 630 (5), 409 S.E.2d 839.
EXHIBIT 32

                APOLLO ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Apollo Entertainment Group,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Michelle Tucker, President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Michelle Tucker
    -------------------
    Michelle Tucker
    President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
    March 16, 2009
---



EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-71077 and 333-106878 on Form S-3, and Nos. 333-73391, 333-106880, 333-106881 and 333-132665 on Form S-8 of our reports, dated March 15, 2010, relating to the financial statements of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Cash Financial Services, Inc.





Hein & Associates LLP
Dallas, Texas 
March 15, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50775

Summary Calendar

CHRISTOPHER L. MCKIVER,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

LINDA GARCIA, Correctional Officer 5; MIRANDA GONZALES, Correctional 

Officer 4,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:16-CV-478

Before WIENER, DENNIS and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher L. McKiver, Texas prisoner #785351, appeals the district 

court’s sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and 

for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)–(ii) and 

§ 1915A(b)(1). McKiver’s claim arises from the confiscation of his personal 

property by prison officials. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 3, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50775 Document: 00514538841 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2018
No. 16-50775

2

The district court found that McKiver failed to allege a constitutional 

procedural due process violation because the prison grievance procedure and 

state tort law provided a meaningful post-deprivation remedy for the loss of 

his property. See Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984). Affording 

McKiver’s pro se brief liberal construction, see Grant v. Cuellar, 59 F.3d 523, 

524 (5th Cir. 1995), he alleges — and the record suggests — that the 

deprivation may have resulted from established state procedure rather than 

random and unauthorized action, meaning that a Section 1983 claim could be 

appropriate. See Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 115, 138 (1990); Augustine 

v. Doe, 740 F.2d 322, 327–29 (5th Cir. 1984). Because the defendants were not 

served in the district court, the Texas Attorney General appeared in this 

appeal as amicus curiae and filed a letter brief, suggesting that we remand this 

case to the district court as the record does not reflect whether the taking was 

pursuant to an established state procedure or was random and unauthorized.

Accordingly, we VACATE the district court’s dismissal of McKiver’s 

Section 1983 complaint and REMAND for further proceedings. We express no 

opinion on the ultimate disposition of the complaint.

 Case: 16-50775 Document: 00514538841 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0259

_________________

DONNIE NOLAN,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Donnie Nolan, to all counsel of 

record, and to the Honorable Donald L. Harris, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 7 2020

10/07/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0259
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,047]


Gehl Company, Corporate Office and Research and Development 
Center, West Bend, WI; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 30, 2009, in response to a 
worker petition filed by the State of Wisconsin on behalf of workers at 
Gehl Company, Corporate Office and Research and Development Center, 
West Bend, Wisconsin.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5906 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Alice W. Polak et al., Respondents, v Robert Gomes et al., Defendants, and Town of Brookhaven, Appellant. (And a Related Action.)

[719 NYS2d 275]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of Brook-*514haven appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated October 1, 1999, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiff Alice W. Polak allegedly was injured when she tripped and fell on a defective sidewalk in the Town of Brook-haven. Town of Brookhaven Code § 84-1 requires that either the Town Clerk or Town Superintendent of Highways receive prior written notice of a defective condition before the Town may be held liable for injuries caused by the condition. It is undisputed that no such notice was provided here. In addition, in opposition to the Town’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the Town created the complained-of condition. Therefore, the Town’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it should have been granted *(see, Amabile v City of Buffalo,*93 NY2d 471; *Poirier v City of Schenectady,*85 NY2d 310; *Greenberg v McLaughlin,*242 AD2d 603; *Nelson v Town of Hempstead,*238 AD2d 391; *Gutierrez v Cohen,*227 AD2d 447). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 24 47

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ BradS. Fran ci s; Ch ris ti ne C. Fran ci s ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

App el la nt s
v. Co m m is si on er o f In te rn al Rev en ue ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

App el le e

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

The Un it edSta te s Tax Co urt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 6, 20 19 Fi le d: May 9, 20 19 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re COLLOTON, BOW MAN, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Brad an d Ch ris ti ne Fran ci s ap pe al fro m th e ta x co urt’s di sm is sa l-- fo r la ck of 1 pr os ecu ti on --o f th ei r ch al le ng e to th e Co m m is si on er of In te rn al Rev enue ’s no ti ce a s s e rti ng an in co m e de fic ie nc y fo r 20 13

. Fo ll owi ng a care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de

The Hon or ab le L. Paig e Marv el , Chi ef J ud ge , Uni te d S ta te s Tax Co urt. 1th at th e ta x co urt ha d juri sd ic ti on ov er th e cas e, s ee W al te rs v. Uni te d St at es , 47 4

F.3 d 11 37 , 11 39 (8 th Ci r. 20 07 ) (lo wer co urt’s de te rm in at io n o f juri sd ic ti on is rev ie wed de no vo ); an d di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n by di sm is si ng th e cas e fo r la ck of pr os ecu ti on , se e Lon g v. Co m m ’r, 74 2 F.2 d 11 41 , 11 43 (8 th Ci r. 19 84 ) (p er cu ria m ) (ta x co urt’s di sm is sa l fo r fai lu re to p r os ecu te is rev ie wed fo r ab us e of di sc ret io n)

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Exhibit 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   December 14, 2010
    /s/ Peter A. EdisonPeter A. EdisonChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy
Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                                                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano                                                                                          
|                       |  |     |  | Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 300 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 300

  Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Defense to 
 transmit, respectively, to the House of Representatives copies of all 
     documents indicating any plans for current or future military 
   assistance to Ukraine and documents indicating whether any United 
States Armed Forces, including special operations forces, are currently 
                          deployed in Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2023

Mr. Gaetz submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Defense to 
 transmit, respectively, to the House of Representatives copies of all 
     documents indicating any plans for current or future military 
   assistance to Ukraine and documents indicating whether any United 
States Armed Forces, including special operations forces, are currently 
                          deployed in Ukraine.

    Resolved, That the President is requested, and the Secretary of 
Defense is directed, to transmit, respectively, to the House of 
Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption 
of this resolution, copies of all documents in the possession of the 
President or the Secretary of Defense, respectively, indicating any 
plans for current or future military assistance to Ukraine and 
documents indicating whether any United States Armed Forces, including 
special operations forces, are currently deployed in Ukraine.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield Futures Fund L.P.(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, David J. Vogel, President andDirector of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector     November 9,2005

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer  Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, May 11, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday, May 11, 2009, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: March 17, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. E9-6395 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Contacts. With whom outside the FAAhasthis proposal beendiscussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association EliCorti 

### 7 

# fz'/(f{, - Regional Airline Assocbltion Dave Lottcrer 

# 7jz.;JrA
- Aircnlft Owners & Pilots Association Rohert Hackman 

# 7/z,/(}i, - AT:\. Craig Fabian 

# 7/Z5/rf{, ~