alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Railroad Administration 

      ( print page 11629)    
Although not required, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is providing notice that it has received a petition for approval of a Railroad Safety Program Plan (RSPP) submitted pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations CFR 236.905, of subpart H. The petition is described below, including the party seeking approval and the requisite docket number where the petition and any related information may be found. This document is available for public inspection, however, FRA is not accepting public comment on the document as this notice is provided for information only. 

## Marquette Rail, LLC  (Docket Number FRA-2009-0017) 

Marquette Rail, LLC submitted a petition for approval of an RSPP. The petition, the RSPP, and any related documents have been placed in the requisite docket and are available for public inspection. 

                    All documents in the public docket are available for inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web site at                     *http://www.regulations.gov.*

                    You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the                     **Federal Register**                     published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78).                 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 12, 2009. 

Grady C. Cothen, Jr. 

Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program Development.

 [FR Doc. E9-5840 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF POLICY

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Transmittal to Docket: Record of the March 15, 2011, Public Meeting in 

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s 

Implementation of Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review

FROM: Stuart C. Miles-McLean

Office of Regulatory Policy and Management

TO: Public Docket #EPA-HQ-OA-2011-0156: Improving Regulations: General

As called for by President Obama in Executive Order 13563, "to facilitate the periodic 

review of existing significant regulations," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is 

considering "how best to promote retrospective analysis of rules that may be outmoded, 

ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal 

them in accordance with what has been learned." 

As part of its retrospective review of regulations, EPA convened public meetings around 

the country to gather input on how we might design the plan we will use to periodically review 

our regulations. This Memo transmits to the docket a record of the public meeting held on

March 15, 2011, in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
#### B. Montgomery, A. R. Maddox and Cora Lee Maddox, *Appellants,*v. James Coleman, et al., *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed February 29, 1928;

Petition for Rehearing Denied March 14, 1928.

*Shepard & Wahl,*for Appellants;

*Willard B. Smith,*for Appellees.

Pee Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Motor to Motor Distance: 

Rotor Type: 

Prop Diameter: 

Approxim ate Flight Ti me: 

Battery: 

Height: 

Weight 

Motor Type: 

Control Link: 

Video Link: 

Video Link Range: 

Satellite Navigation System: 

15.7 in (400mm) 

au a dco pte r 

10.2 In (260mm) 

30 m inLJJtes 

11 .1V 3S 5400mAh 

9.50 in (242mm) 

45.9 oz. (1 .3 kg) 

4:.: 790Kv Bru shless OutrLJJnn er 

2.4 GHz. 

5.8GHz 

1.970 ft (600m) 

GPS, GLONASS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                  
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephanie D. Lepori                                                                                          
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Stephanie D. Lepori, Chief Financial Officer of Circus
and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
[No. 52146-2-I.

Division One.

June 14, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Graham Payne, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-10362-2, Brian D. Gain, J., entered April 7, 2003. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul E. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106670

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: February 13, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

Paul Smith ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion. Movant claims his three-year sentence of imprisonment for stealing over $500 was unauthorized by law according to *State v. Bazell* , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), which held that offense was not a felony, but was actually a misdemeanor. But *Bazell* was handed down *after* Movant's sentence was imposed, and as the State correctly pointed out to the motion court, *Bazell* cannot be applied retroactively, only prospectively, expect to cases pending on direct appeal, as determined in *State ex rel. Windeknecht v. Mesmer* , 530 S.W.3d 500, 503 (Mo. banc 2017). The motion court did not err by dismissing Movant's case on this ground. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We affirm under Rule 84.16(b).
Herbert L. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 105573

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: May 15, 2018

Stephen Ranz, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.

Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Herbert Hill appeals the motion court's judgment, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant pleaded guilty to burglary in the first *161degree, in violation of Section 569.160 RSMo (2016) (Count I), and sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo (2016) (Count II). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sylva Leduc, certify, that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Conscious
         Intention, Inc.;
2.       Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
         to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
         such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
         covered by this report;
3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this report, fairly present in all material
         respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
         of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
         registrant and we have:
a.       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;
b.       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c.       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.
5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee or registrant's board of directors (or persons
         performing the equivalent function):
a.       All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal
         controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
         adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
         and report financial information; and
b.       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         controls.


/s/ Sylva Leduc
-------------------
Sylva Leduc
Chief Executive Officer
Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: May 17, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Goldland Holdings Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:



1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2012 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Pierre Quilliam



Pierre Quilliam,

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)



Date:  April 15, 2013
EXHIBIT 99.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of UHF Incorporated on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald C. Schmeiser, President and Chief Executive Officer of UHF Incorporated, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    
|--------------------
|Date: April 18, 2003
|
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of ANTIVIRAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 (the "Report"), I, Cheng Kin Chung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.    By: /s/ Cheng Kin Chung, Chief Financial Officer  Date: August 21, 2012
## THE STATE OF TEXAS
MANDATE

TO THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT OF FRANKLIN CO UNTY, GREETINGS:
Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 17th
day of March, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

David Michael Dollins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 14

- 00133

- CR

Trial Court No. F

- 8840

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We further order that the appellant, David Michael Dollins, pay all costs of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this
behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.
WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with
the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 13th day of May , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
Exhibit
        32.1
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Conscious Intention, Inc.
        (the"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Sylva Leduc, President
        and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
              To
                  my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                  of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
 
 
 /s/
        Sylva
        Leduc
 Sylva
        Leduc
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Duly
        Authorized Officer and Principal
 Financial
        and Accounting Officer
 
  Date: August
        12, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,109]


Fortis Plastics, LLC, Fort Smith, AR; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 4, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by the Rapid Response Coordinator for the State of 
Arkansas on behalf of workers of Fortis Plastics, LLC, Fort Smith, 
Arkansas.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March, 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6294 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 34.1

[Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP]







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
Protective Life Insurance Company:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying "Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria" that Protective Life Insurance Company complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Protective Life Secured Trust Notes (the Platform), as of December 31, 2009 and for the year then ended, excluding (i) the criteria which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the Platform and (ii) the servicing activities that are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein, as indicated in Appendix A of Management's Assertion on Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria.  Appendix B to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.  Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
March 25, 2010
The H onorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for th e 1 Western District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3015

___________ Harold W. Bass, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Allied Signal Aerospace Company, *
**C** [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 5, 1999 Filed: February 16, 1999

___________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Harold W. Bass appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgmen t 1 to his former employer in this 42 U.S.C. § 1981 race discrimination action. Havin g carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we affirm th e judgment of the district court for the reasons it stated. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:                 November 15, 2010



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant