alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charalambous Nicolaides, Appellant, v Nyack Hospital et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (And Another Action.)

[719 NYS2d 710]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated November 9, 1999, which granted the respective motions of the defendants Nyack Hospital, Stuart Rasch, Martin L. Hoffman, and Mark Pomerantz, pursuant to CPLR 3216, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered February 1, 2000, dismissing the complaint against those defendants. The notice of appeal from the order is also deemed to be a notice of appeal from the judgment *(see,*CPLR 5501 [c]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see,*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Pursuant to CPLR 3216, each of the defendants served a 90-day notice upon the plaintiff to serve and file a note of issue placing this case on the calendar. The 90-day period expired and the defendants separately moved to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

It was incumbent on the plaintiff to comply with the notices *618by timely filing a note of issue or moving for an extension of time within which to comply *(see, Timko v Loreto,*263 AD2d 480; *Safina v Queens-Long Is. Med. Group,*238 AD2d 395; *Longacre Corp. v Better Hosp. Equip. Corp.,*228 AD2d 653). Having failed to pursue either option, the plaintiff was obligated to demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the failure to comply with the notices and a meritorious' cause of action *(see, M.P.S. Mktg. Seros, v Champion Inti. Corp.,*176 AD2d 250).

In opposition to the motions, the plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit of merit by a medical expert demonstrating malpractice on behalf of the defendants. Rather, the plaintiff’s claims of malpractice were supported only by an unsworn letter from a physician setting forth certain findings with regard to the treatment rendered to the plaintiff’s decedent. The letter failed to indicate that the defendants’ acts deviated from accepted medical standards or were a proximate cause of the death. The letter was not evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action *(see, Jederlinic v Arya,*209 AD2d 586; *Fiore v Galang,*64 NY2d 999). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ respective motions to dismiss the complaint *(see, Perez v Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Ctr.,*173 AD2d 530; *Herrington v Saratoga Hosp.,*202 AD2d 901). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ JoAnn A. Reed
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             |  | JoAnn A. Reed                                             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:            |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CERTIFICATION EVALUATION AND CONCURRENCE Jan. 29, 2016 Report Request ID: 1407484 Report Code: AMP600

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:GHG

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region 55 009 0005 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration CRITERIA 42401

SELECTED OPTIONS
MERGE PDF FILES AGENCY ROLE Option Type Option Value YES CERTIFYING DATE CRITERIA
2015 Start Date End Date 2015 Tribal CodeJan. 29, 2016 

# Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report Summary

Page 1 of 1 2015 

## Certification Year: Certifying Agency (CA):Wisconsin Dept Of Natural Resources, Air Monitoring Section (1175) 

## Pollutants in Report:

PQAOParameter Code Sulfur dioxide 42401 

## Parameter Name Code 1

1175 Wisconsin Dept Of Natural Resources, Air Monitoring Section 

## PQAO Code

AQS Site-ID POC AQS Recommended Flag Cert. Agency

Recommended Flag Reason for AQS Recommendation 1175 42401 1 55-009-0005 N Y Quality Assurance Project Plan not approved in 10 years. 

## Signature of Monitoring Organization Representative: ________________________________________________________

PQAO Name Summary of 'N' flags for all pollutants: 0 1 

## PQAOs in Report: 04/26/12 

## TSA Date Monitors Evaluated Monitors Recommended for

Concurrence by AQS Monitors NOT Recommended for Concurrence by AQS

# Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 2015 Certifying Year Certifying Agency CodeWisconsin Dept Of Natural Resources, Air Monitoring Section (1175) Sulfur dioxide (42401) (ppb) Wisconsin Dept Of Natural Resources, Air Monitoring Section (1175) PQAO Name 03/01/1988 QAPP Approval Date

1 55-009-0005 SLAMS 1.4 Mean 0.0

Min 73.8 Max Exceed. Count 0

Outlier Count 95 Perc. Comp. 1.83

Precision+/-2.00

Bias 100 Complete 100 Complete Bias Y

PQAO Level Criteria N Aqs Rec Flag Y

CA Rec Flag S Epa Concur Data has been reviewed. Submitter Comment 

## Parameter

1 Y Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

### NPAP Audit Summary: .811877

- 3.67 Routine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag AQS Site ID POC Monitor

Type Bias QAPP Appr. N

# Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter

# Data Concurrence and Evaluation Report for Lead
Order entered July 1, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00100-CV

IN RE ELDA TELLE , ELAINE BOSCH, CAITLIN DICKEY AND 

CHICAGO TITLE OF TEXAS, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 471st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 471-01185-2021

ORDER

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith

Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus challenging the 

trial court’s orders holding relators in contempt.

We request that the respondent and real party in interest file a response, if 

any, to relators’ petition for writ of mandamus within TWENTY DAYS of the 

date of this order.

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11739-11740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation 
(U01) and Planning (R34) Grants.
    Date: April 8, 2009.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Brenda Lange-Gustafson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, NIH/NIAID/DEA/DHHS, Scientific Review Program, Room 2217, 
6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-
2550, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7012170503041116031f1e301e191119145e1e19185e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="177570626463767164787957797e767e7339797e7f39707861">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


[[Page 11740]]


    Dated: March 10, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-5975 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 4.1 











COMMON



COMMON



15986



ELECTRO-SENSORS, INC.



INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA



See reverse side for certain definitions 



THIS CERTIFIES THAT 



CUSIP  285233  10  2



is the owner of



FULL-PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF TEN CENTS EACH OF



ELECTRO-SENSORS, INC.



transferable only on the books of the corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized
attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. 



         This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said corporation has caused
this certificate to be signed by its authorized officers and to be sealed with the seal of the corporation. 



Dated: 



SECRETARY



PRESIDENT









37
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of UHF Incorporated on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald C.
Schmeiser, President and Chief Executive Officer of UHF Incorporated, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 8, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald C. Schmeiser
|                   |  |     |  | Ronald C. Schmeiser    
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief    
|                   |  |     |  | Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31-1**

Certification pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Dominique Einhorn, President & CEO of Karma Media, Inc., certify that:

1.

This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant;

2.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Karma Media, Inc.;

3.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

4.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report ("Evaluation Date"); and

c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

1.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors [or persons performing the equivalent function]:

a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

1.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:

August 6, 2004

By:

/s/ Dominique Einhorn

Dominique Einhorn, President & CEO
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) of Keating Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Timothy J. Keating, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











/s/ Timothy J. KeatingName:
Timothy J. KeatingDate:
March 1, 2012
AFS-12-225-E April 11, 2012

Exemption No. 10505 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0238

Ms. Amy Rogers Parent of Soren Rogers

2034 East Glenoaks Boulevard Glendale, CA 91206

Dear Ms. Rogers:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received February 29, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Soren Rogers for an ex emption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Soren to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Soren.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security2

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Soren Rogers an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Soren is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Soren to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Soren’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Soren Rogers may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Soren’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


National Sea Grant Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the Sea Grant Advisory Board (Board). Board 
members will discuss and provide advice on the National Sea Grant 
College Program in the areas of program evaluation, strategic planning, 
education and extension, science and technology programs, and other 
matters as described in the Agenda below.

DATES: The announced meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 11 
and Thursday, February 12, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the offices of the Consortium 
for Oceanographic Research and Education (CORE), 1201 New York Ave, 
NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Melissa Pearson, National Sea 
Grant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 
1315 East-West Highway, Room 11717, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, 301-
713-1083.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board, which consists of a balanced 
representation from academia, industry, state government and citizens 
groups, was established by Section 209 of the Sea Grant Program 
Improvement Act of 1976 (Pub. L. 94-461, 33 U.S.C. 1128). The duties of 
the Board were amended by the National Sea Grant College Program 
Amendments Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-394). The Board advises the 
Secretary of Commerce and the Director of the National Sea Grant 
College Program with respect to operations under the Act, and such 
other matters as the Secretary refers to them for review and advice.
    The agenda for the meeting can be found at http://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/leadership/advisory_board.html.

    Dated: January 8, 2009.
Mark E. Brown,
Chief Financial Officer/Chief Administrator Officer, Office of Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Research.
[FR Doc. E9-617 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KA-P