alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 03-2429

IN RE STONE & WEBSTER, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION ADELE BRODY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated; FRED DUBOIS, JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; ALBERT A. BLANK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; DAVID B. EVERSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; FANNY MANDELBAUM, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated; MARK HANSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, RAM TRUST SERVICES, INC., LENS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC, Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. STONE & WEBSTER, INC., H. KERNER SMITH, THOMAS LANGFORD,

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA The opinion of this court dated July 14, 2005, is amended as follows: On page 2, line 4, replace “appellant” with “appellants.” On page 11, line 22, delete the comma between “We have explained” and “that ‘[]under the . . . .”On page 12, line 2, insert a space between “§” and “78u4(b)(2).” On page 14, line 17, delete “two” between “as part of GAAP,” and “accounting methods.”On page 20, line 15, insert “the” between “complied

sufficiently with” and “PSLRA’s requirement.” On page 20, line 18, insert “the” between “previously stated that” and “PSLRA does not.” On page 21, line 7, insert “the” between “requirement of” and “PSLRA.” On page 27, line 6, insert “a” between “imposes no burden on” and “plaintiff to prove.” On page 42, line 22, replace “Any” with “any” following “(2).” On page 42, line 24, replace “Because” with “because” following “(3).” On page 46, line 10, insert “to be” between “may appear” and “the inevitable.” On page 50, line 22, replace “defendant’s” with “defendants’ ” between “in considering the” and “motion to dismiss.” On page 54, line 16, replace “ superceded ” with “ superseded ” before “ by statute on other grounds .” On page 56, line 9, replace “PWC” with “PwC” between “that” and “audits were performed.” On page 57, line 11, insert “the” between “clarity-and-basis test of” and “PSLRA.” On page 59, line 1, replace “allegations” with “allegation” between “The final” and “on which plaintiffs rely.”
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary of TierOne Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
            period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 6, 2004             By: /s/ Eugene B. Witkowicz
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive Vice
                                 President and Chief Financial Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to TierOne Corporation and will be retained
by TierOne Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                       45
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       
|   



|Date: August 9, 2007
|--------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Brian J. Roney, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Pointe Holdings Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Intentionally omitted.     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: August 11, 2006              /s/ Brian J. Roney   Brian J. Roney   Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 13228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Development of Rapid, Reliable, and Economical 
Methods for Inspection and Monitoring of Highway Bridges

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 24, 2009, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act'') Development of Rapid, 
Reliable, and Economical Methods for Inspection and Monitoring of 
Highway Bridges has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX; 
National Instruments Corporation, Austin, TX; and Wiss, Janey, Elstner 
Associates, Inc., Northbrook, IL. The general area of Development of 
Rapid, Reliable, and Economical Methods for Inspection and Monitoring 
of Highway Bridges' planned activity is to conduct certain specified 
research involving the development of innovative technologies for 
inspecting, monitoring, and evaluating critical components of the 
nation's roadways and bridges (including the development of efficient, 
accurate, low-cost and reliable wireless sensors and related 
technologies that can provide quantitative assessments of the 
structural integrity or degree of deterioration of bridges and 
roadways).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
 [FR Doc. E9-6372 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Robert PETTY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 106300

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: February 26, 2019

Christian Lehmberg, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Robert Petty (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).1

1

Mo. R. Civ. P. 2019.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | March                16, 2007                                         |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                  |   |
|   |                                                                  |   |
|   | ***/s/                Michael J. Rogers***                            |   |
|   | Michael                J. Rogers                                      |   |
|   | Executive                Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joseph Kristul, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of EPOD Solar Inc.
(formerly Allora Minerals, Inc.);

2.      Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.      The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.      Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared; and

b.      Evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c.      Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;

---

5.      The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.      All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b.      Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2011

/s/ Joseph
KristulJoseph KristulPresident and Chief Executive Officer,(Principal
executive officer, principal financial and principal accounting officer)

---
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver

Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York

Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated

offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 036787/000001 - 3368614 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

June 13, 2013

By Electronic Mail

Ms. Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Frontier Airlines, Inc. for Exemption

(Rockford, Illinois-Puerto Vallarta, Mexico), Docket DOT-OST-2013-0116

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

On behalf of Frontier Airlines, Inc., we have polled the U.S. carrier representatives served

with the above-referenced Application filed on June 5, 2013, and no carrier has objected to the relief

sought therein.

Sincerely,

Patrick R. Rizzi

Counsel

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

D +1 202 637 5659

Counsel for Frontier Airlines, Inc.

cc: bob.kneisley@wnco.com; marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com; robert.wirick@aa.com;

francis.heil@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; sametta.c.barnett@delta.com;

jhill@dowlohnes.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; dkirstein@yklaw.com;

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com; dan.weiss@united.com;

steve.morrissey@united.com; howard_kass@usairways.com;

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com; brian.hedberg@dot.gov; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov;

brett.kruger@dot.gov; urskr@state.gov; info@airlineinfo.com
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-081 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
Exhibit 15.5







DeGolyer
and MacNaughton



5001 Spring Valley Road

Suite 800 East

Dallas, Texas 75244







April 19, 2012



Board of Directors

Ecopetrol S.A.

Calle 35 No. 7-21 Piso 1

Bogota, D.C. Colombia

Ladies and Gentlemen:



We hereby consent to
the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton and to the inclusion of and information derived from our third party letter report dated
January 25, 2012, containing our opinions regarding our estimates, as of December 31, 2011, of the proved oil, condensate,
natural gas, and oil equivalent reserves of certain selected properties owned by Ecopetrol S.A. in Colombia and in the United States
of America (our Third Party Letter Report) as set forth under the headings “Presentation of Information Concerning Reserves,”
“Item 4. Information on the Company—Overview by Business Segment—Reserves,” “Item 18, Financial
Statements, Table IV – Reserve Information,” “Item 19. Exhibits,” and as Exhibit 99.3 in the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Ecopetrol S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Annual Report”); provided, however,
that we are necessarily unable to verify the accuracy of the reserves estimates contained in the Annual Report because our estimates
of reserves have been combined with estimates of reserves prepared by other petroleum consultants.



We further consent
to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton, as set forth in the Ecopetrol S.A. Registration Statement on Form F-3, filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2010 (the “Form F-3”), under the heading “Experts,”
and to the incorporation by reference of this consent and our Third Party Letter Report in the Form F-3.





| | Very truly yours,                      
| | ---------------------------------------
| |                                        
| |                                        
| |                                        
| | /s/ DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON           
| | DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON               
| | Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Bay Ridge Air Rights, Inc., Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Edward Marlatt, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br>Edward Marlatt, appellant pro se.<br><br>Tane Waterman &amp; Wurtzel, P.C., Stewart E. Wurtzel, Esq., for respondent.<br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Maria Ressos, J.), entered June 17, 2015. The order denied tenant's motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this nonprimary-residence holdover proceeding, the parties entered into a stipulation of settlement in which it was agreed, among other things, that landlord would discontinue the proceeding and that tenant would pay landlord $2,400 in attorney's fees. Tenant thereafter moved to vacate the stipulation, arguing, among other things, that he had reconsidered his agreement to pay attorney's fees. By order entered June 17, 2015, the Civil Court denied tenant's motion. </p><p>On appeal, tenant expresses his willingness to pay the stipulated fees but only if landlord removes other charges that it subsequently added to his bill. As tenant shows no basis to set aside the stipulation, and as his brief on appeal refers to matters that are dehors the record, the order is affirmed.</p><p>Weston, J.P., Pesce and Aliotta, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<p>Paul Kenny</p>Chief Clerk<br><br>Decision Date: April 07, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Jimmy SHELBY, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

WD 81472

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: November 6, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 18, 2018

Jimmy Shelby, Bonne Terre, MO, Appellant Acting Pro Se.

Olivea Myers, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., Edward R. Ardini, and Thomas N. Chapman, JJ.

*354**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Jimmy Shelby appeals a judgment denying his request for jail-time credit for time imprisoned while awaiting trial on multiple counts of first-degree robbery. Shelby asserts he is entitled to jail-time credit because he met the requirements of R.S.Mo. Sec. 558.031.1, which provides credit for time served while awaiting trial.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).