alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5454 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5454

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2007.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND 
              JUDGES.

    Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97-92, Justices and judges of 
the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2007 to receive a 
salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of title 28, United 
States Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5454

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2007.
```
1 

### Nesky, Anthony

To: Nesky, Anthony Subject: FW: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2012- 088 requesting a hearing in Chadron NE

From: Juli Ames

‐ Curtis [ mailto:mtsagemassage@yahoo.com ]

Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2015 11:50 PM

To: Rosencrantz, Ingrid Subject: Docket ID Number EPA

‐ HQ

‐ OAR

‐ 2012

‐ 088 requesting a hearing in Chadron NE

I have already sent a letter to your office supporting the propos ed water protection rules. (Docket ID Number EPA-HQOAR-2012-088).

We are told there will be a hearing in Casper, WY concerning this matter. The problem is that the nearest public hearing
on the rules is far from a central lo cation for the in-situ uranium mines op erating and proposed in the SD/WY/NE are. There is a uranium mine in NW Nebraska, as well as the proposed mine in Fall River and Cu ster Counties. As a citizen of Custer, SD who lives close to the proposed Dewey-Burdock, SD mine I request a public hearing in Chadron, NE, just
south of the South Dakota border. I am also a member of Da kota Rural Action and our grou p supports this request for a hearing in Chadron, NE.

Thank you for your time and consideration,

Juli Ames-Curtis Paha Sapa Healing Arts
970-391-9921 pahasapaha@gmail.com
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification**
I, Leslye L. Grindle, C.F.O., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Southern CommunityBancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 17, 2004       /s/ Leslye L. Grindle
#### P. G. Gaines *v.*George P. Stovall *et al.*

(No. 7557)

Submitted November 1, 1933.

Decided November 7, 1933.

*283
      *Martin*cfe *Martin*and *Hartley Sanders,*for appellant.

*James S. Kahle,*for appellees.

Litz, Judge:

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal for failure of appellant to deposit with the clerk of this court within three months from the docketing of the appeal an amount sufficient to pay the costs of printing the record in the cause.

After the expiration of the three months’ period, without the deposit having been made, the appellant asked leave to move for reversal on the original record, which leave was granted and the cause docketed for hearing. This action was taken without the attention of the court being called to the fact that more than three months had elapsed since the docketing of the appeal; otherwise, the request should have been refused.

Section 17, article 5, chapter 58, Code 1931, provides that “should the appellant or plaintiff in error fail for three months after his case has been docketed in the court of appeals to deposit with the clerk of said court of appeals a sufficient sum to pay for the printing of the record, he shall be deemed to have abandoned his appeal or writ of error and *the same shall he dismissed;** * The act has been held mandatory in *Perry*v. *Horn,*21 W. Va. 732; *Kelner*v. *Cowden,*60 W. Va. 600, 55 S. E. 649, and *Huffman*v. *Gwinn,*104 W. Va. 328, 140 S. E. 50, 51. In the last case, this court said: “The purpose of the statute under consideration is to prevent delay on the part of the appellant or plaintiff in error in perfecting his appeal or writ. With this in view, the act is mandatory in terms, requiring a dismissal of the appeal or writ of error for failure of the appellant or plaintiff in error to comply with its requirements. The statute has been so applied by this court in *Perry*v. *Horn,*21 W. Va. 732; *Kelner*v. *Cowden,*60 W. Va. 600 (55 S. E. 649), and it has been similarly held that the failure of the appellant or plaintiff in error to perfect an appeal, writ of error or supersedeas by executing an appeal *284bond within the time prescribed by the statute makes it the mandatory duty of the appellate court to dismiss the appeal, writ of error or supersedeas, although the bond has been given after expiration of such time. *Scott*v. *Railway Company,*70 W. Va. 777 (74 S. E. 992).”

We cannot ignore the plain terms of the statute or depart from our former rulings thereon merely because the appeal may be meritorious. As this court had already lost jurisdiction, the placing of the cause on the docket to be heard upon the original record did not alter the situation. The motion to dismiss in the *Huffman*case was interposed at the hearing long after the record had been printed.

The motion is, therefore, sustained.

*Motion sustained.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification of CEOunder Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

*I certify that this periodic reportcontaining the issuer’s financial statements fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in thisperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.*

 
| * * | *By: /s/  Keith C. Robbins*         | * *                  |
|----------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|     |                                |
|     | President,  Chief Executive Officer |
|     |                                |
| * * | *Date:*                             | *November 10,  2005* | * * |
|          |                                     |                           |  |  |

 

----
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T Nov. 13, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 9- 10 26 6

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 0 7- 00 03 9- CV-RLV-1 MELISSA TURNER, Pla in ti ff-Ap pe ll an t- Cro ss -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us ATLANT IC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC., Defen da nt -Ap pe ll ee- Cro ss -Ap pe ll an t, CRAIG R. CUM BIE, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll ee.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal s fr om

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (No ve m be r 13 , 20 09 ) Befo re BLACK, WILSON andCOX, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM:App el la nt , Mel is saTurn er, a fo rm er fl ig htatt en da ntforApp el le e Atl an ti c

So ut he as t Ai rli ne s, In c. (ASA), cl ai m edsh e was rap edby A SA pi lo t Ap pe ll ee Crai g R . Cum

bi e, du rin g a n o ve rn ig htlayov er. App el la ntbro ug htm ul ti pl e st at e
an d fe de ral law cl ai m s ag ai ns t ASA an d s ta te law cl ai m s ag ai ns t Cu m bi e. The di st ric t co urt g ran te d s umm ary jud gm en t i n fa vo r of ASA on all co un ts
. The reaf te r, th e d is tri ctco urt d ecl in edto ex erci se juri sd ic ti on ov er t he st at e la w cl ai m s ag ai ns t Cu m

bi e an d d is m is se d t he m

wit ho utpre

jud ic e. ASA m ov edfor
sa nc ti on s ag ai ns t Ap pe ll an t an d h er at to rn ey , whi ch th e co ur t d en ie d i n t he same
or de r gr an ti ng ASA su m

m ary jud gm en t. Turne r ap pe al edth e su m m ary jud gm en t in fav orof ASA o n h er Tit le VII, FMLA in te rfer en ce, i nt en ti on al in fli ct io n o f
em ot io na l d is tre ss , andne gl ig en t i nf li ct io n o f em ot io na l d is tre ss cla im s, as well as th e d is m is sa l o f he r cl ai m s ag ai ns t Cu m bi e. ASA cro ss -ap pe al edth e d en ia l o f it s
m ot io n fo r sa nc ti on s ag ai ns t Ap pe ll an t an d h er at to rn ey . Upo n re vi ewin g t he reco rdan d t he pa rti es ’ br ie fs an d e njo y in g t he be ne fit of ora l ar gu m en t, we co nc lu de th e d is tri ctco ur t d idno t err. AFFIRMED.

2
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TierOne Corporation (the Company),
hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
                    June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of                     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)                     or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                                            
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|Date:  August 3, 2004 | By:  /s/ Gilbert G. Lundstrom              
|                      | Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of the Board
|                      | and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Arroyo, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 33]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered March 10, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years and lVs to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

During a lengthy colloquy, conducted well into the trial, the court, which was already familiar with defendant and his extensive criminal background, fully apprised defendant of the *387risks and responsibilities involved in waiving counsel and proceeding *pro se (see, People v Smith,*92 NY2d 516).

There was ample evidence establishing the element of “physical injury” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; § 160.10 [2] [a]), given the complainant’s testimony that he suffered substantial pain when defendant pulled on the complainant’s thick gold neck chain until it broke *(see, People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636). Moreover, there was testimony that the injury caused pain and red marks which lasted two to three weeks after the incident.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Williams, J. P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |        |  |                                   
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ JoAnn A. Reed                 
|                       |  | Name:  |  | JoAnn A. Reed                     
|                       |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and
|                       |  |        |  | Chief Financial Officer           

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 33.1**

 

MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

 

Protective Life Insurance Company (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2012 and for the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria specified in item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB, except for the criteria in Appendix A, which we have concluded are not applicable to the servicing of our Protective Life Secured Trust Notes (the “Platform”) or are not serviced by the Asserting Party (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Platform serviced by the Asserting Party listed in Appendix B.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

Protective Life Insurance Company

 
| By:    | /s/ JUDY WILSON       |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Judy Wilson           |   |
| Title: | Senior Vice President |   |
|   |                  |   |
| Date:  | March 26, 2013        |   |

 

----

 

APPENDIX A SERVICING CRITERIA NOT APPLICABLE TO ASSERTING PARTY

 

The following servicing criteria of 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable to the platform and included in The Bank of New York Mellon’s assertion (see Exhibit 33.2 to the 10-K), but excluded from the Asserting Party’s assertion:

 

229.1122(d)(1)(i)-(ii)

229.1122(d)(2)(i) — (vii)

229.1122(d)(3)(ii) — (iv)

229.1122(d)(4)(i) — (v)

229.1122(d)(4)(vii)

229.1122(d)(4)(xv)

 

The following servicing criteria of 1122(d) of Regulation AB are not provided for in the underlying documentation of the platform and, therefore, not applicable to the platform:

 

229.1122(d)(1)(iii) — (iv)

229.1122(d)(4)(vi)

229.1122(d)(4)(viii)

229.1122(d)(4)(x) — (xiv)

 

2

----

 

APPENDIX B INDIVIDUAL TRUSTS RELATED TO PROGRAM

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the following trusts:

 

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-6

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-B

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-D

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-3

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-4

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-5

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-6

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-7

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-8

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-9

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-10

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-11

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-12

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-13

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-14

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-15

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-18

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-19

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-20

 

3

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Ladybug Resource Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Molly
S. Ramage, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Molly S. Ramage


Molly S.
Ramage


Title:
President (Principal Executive Officer) and


Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





September
28, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


     CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary McGaha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                           /s/ Gary McGaha
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Gary McGaha, President and Director





August 14, 2002
| (1)   | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Dongsheng Pharmaceutical International Co., Ltd.. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: September 22, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Jianping Chen       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Jianping Chen                |   |
|                     |   | Principal Accounting Officer |   |