alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                     Percentage
                                                                                                         of 
   Parent (at December 31, 1998)                             Subsidiary                               Ownership
-----------------------------------       ----------------------------------------------           --------------
<S>                                         <C>                                                    <C>
Bay View Capital Corporation                Bay View Bank (1)                                            100%
Bay View Capital Corporation                Bay View Commercial Finance Group (2)                        100%
Bay View Capital Corporation                Bay View Securitization Corporation                          100%
Bay View Capital Corporation                Regent Financial Corporation (3)                             100%
Bay View Capital Corporation                Bay View Capital I                                           100%
Bay View Bank                               Bay View Acceptance Corporation                              100%
Bay View Bank                               MoneyCare, Inc.                                              100%
Bay View Bank                               Bay View Auxiliary Corporation                               100%
Bay View Acceptance Corporation             Bay View Credit                                              100%
Bay View Acceptance Corporation             Ultra Funding, Inc.                                          100%
Bay View Acceptance Corporation             LFS-BV, Inc.                                                 100%
</TABLE>

(1) Bay View Bank became Bay View Bank, N.A. in connection with its conversion
    to a national bank effective March 1, 1999.
(2) Bay View Commercial Finance Group became a subsidiary of Bay View Bank
    effective March 1, 1999.
(3) Regent Financial Corporation was merged with Bay View Bank and dissolved
    effective January 1, 1999.


The financial statements of the Registrant are consolidated with those of its
subsidiaries.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-


Oxley
Act of 2002





I,  Cindy
Kostoff, certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report of Custom Q, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, fully
complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Custom Q, Inc.





Date:  November
22, 2009





By:
              /s/ Cindy KostoffCindy
      Kostoff, CEO





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Custom Q, Inc. and will be retained by
Custom Q, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT**


**TO
      18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of **Bio-Lok
      International Inc.** (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended October 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      and the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      such
      officer’s knowledge:





a)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a)  or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





b)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Registrant.





**Bio-Lok
      International Inc.**





/s/
      Bruce L. Hollander





Bruce
      L.
      Hollander


Chief
      Executive Officer


January
      25, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,429] 

                    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 27, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Cenveo Cadmus                           ( print page 12383)                        Communications, Ephrata, Pennsylvania.                 

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6310 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 31 

Honoring Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, on reaching the historic 

milestone of 115 years of serving communities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2023 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Ms. NORTON, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. SEWELL, Ms. 

WILSON of Florida, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. UNDERWOOD, Ms. 

WILLIAMS of Georgia, and Mrs. SYKES) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, on reaching 

the historic milestone of 115 years of serving communities. 

Whereas Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, was founded on 

January 15, 1908, at Howard University in Washington, 

DC, by Ethel Hedgemon, Anna Easter Brown, Beulah 

Elizabeth Burke, Lillie E. Burke, Marjorie Hill, Margaret Flagg, Lavinia Norman, Lucy Diggs Slowe, and 

Marie Woolfolk; 

Whereas these 9 young women founded Alpha Kappa Alpha 

Sorority, Inc.®, on the 5 original core tenets: to cultivate 

and encourage high scholastic and ethical standards; to 

promote unity and friendship among college women; to 

study and help alleviate problems concerning girls and 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 31 IH 

women in order to improve their social stature; to maintain a progressive interest in college life; and to be of 

‘‘Service to All Mankind’’; 

Whereas Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, was successfully incorporated on January 29, 1913; 

Whereas, since its founding in 1908, Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, membership now includes over 1,000 chapters internationally, with more than 120,000 active members, and has initiated more than 325,000 members 

worldwide; 

Whereas Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®, is dedicated to 

implementing programs of service that enhance the wellbeing of local, national, and international communities; 

Whereas the theme of that service program for 2022–2026 

is ‘‘Soaring to Greater Heights of Service & Sisterhood’’ 

and will involve 6 initiatives, namely— 

(1) Strengthen Our Sisterhood; 

(2) Empower Our Families; 

(3) Build Our Economic Wealth; 

(4) Enhance Our Environment; 

(5) Advocate for Social Justice; and 

(6) Uplift Our Local Community; 

Whereas Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®’s present administration looks to use each of these initiatives to empower members to lead on the front lines of change, education, and advocacy; and 

Whereas, among its many accomplished members, Vice President Kamala Harris, the first woman to occupy the Office of the Vice President of the United States, is a proud 

member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.®: Now, 

therefore, be it 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 31 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates and commends Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, 

3 Inc.®, on 115 years of service. 

Æ 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 15.2



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
Ecopetrol S.A.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement (No. 333-190198) on Form F-3 of Ecopetrol, S.A of our report dated April 29, 2013, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheet of Ecopetrol, S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and the related consolidated statements
of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities, Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, and Cash Flows for the years
ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, which appear in this annual report on Form 20-F of Ecopetrol S.A. for the year ended December
31, 2013.



/s/KPMG Limitada



Bogotá, Colombia
April 25, 2014
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02803

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 02803\02803_Checklist_Template.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02803\02803_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 02803\02803_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02803\02803_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02803\02803_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

02803\Certification Statement Plant ID 02803.pdf Plant certification statement

x 02803\Supplemental Documents\02803_A5-3 final water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
May 29, 2015

Mr. Kevin Lipscomb Magnum Home Inspections, Inc

P.O. Box 700906 San Antonio, TX 78720

Dear Mr. Lipscomb.:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 28, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1264), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
** **

**EXHIBIT32.1**

**FORM10-QSB**

**Section1350 Certification**

# **Quarterended September 30, 2006**

I, James B. Druck, ChiefExecutive Officer of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”) certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the second quarter ended September30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

(2)                                  Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2006

 /s/ James B.Druck                              James B. DruckChief Executive Officer

 

----
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Leslye Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          /s/ Leslye Grindle
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Leslye Grindle, Sr. Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

August 16, 2004

                                       21
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield Futures Fund L.P.(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector     August 9,2005

----
#### Blankman Hotel Corp. et al., Respondents, v J.L. White Investments, Inc., Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 157]

In an action for a judgment declaring that certain modifications to a management agreement and a partnership agreement are valid and enforceable, which was submitted to arbitration pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated January 6, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to vacate an arbitration award dated April 21, 1999.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to vacate the arbitration award is denied, and the arbitration award is confirmed.

An arbitrator’s paramount responsibility is to reach an equitable result *(see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg],*46 NY2d 623), and an arbitration award may not be vacated unless, *inter alia,*it clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator’s powers *(see, Matter of Town of Callicoon [Civil Serv. Empls. Assn.],*70 NY2d 907). Contrary to the finding of the Supreme Court, the arbitrator did not clearly exceed his authority, despite the restrictive language of the 1980 partnership agreement at issue. The parties voluntarily entered into a broadly-worded stipulation designed to include the resolution of all claims between them. A review of all the submissions relative to the arbitration hearing establish that reformation of the 1980 partnership agreement was a possible issue to be *598resolved by an arbitrator. Therefore, the arbitrator acted within the powers conferred upon him by including the reformation of the 1980 partnership agreement in his award. Accordingly, the arbitration award is confirmed. Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officers of Radiant Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




DATE: November 14, 2011





BY: /s/ Bohn H. Crain


Chief Executive Officer








BY: /s/ Todd E. Macomber


Chief Financial Officer





This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiant Logistics, Inc. and will be retained by Radiant Logistics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division 

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 13, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”) Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on Development and Evaluation of a Gas Chromatograph Testing Protocol (“GCTP”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its nature and objective. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the period of performance has been extended to March 15, 2009.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and GCTP intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. 

                    On March 6, 2008, GCTP filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 7, 2008 (73 FR 18813).                 

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 26, 2008. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 31, 2008 (73 FR 80430).                 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

 [FR Doc. E9-6376 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE
Exhibit 15.3







| | TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580 |                           | FAX (713) 651-0849      
| | --------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ------------------------
| | 1100 LOUISIANA    SUITE 3800            | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5235 | TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191







April 19, 2012





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS





Ryder Scott Company,
L.P. consents to the references to our firm included in Ecopetrol S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2011 (the “Annual Report”), and to the inclusion of our reports dated January 23 and February 7, 2012 (our “Reports”)
as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report, as well as to the incorporation by reference of this consent and our Reports into Ecopetrol’s
S.A.’s registration statement on Form F-3 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on or about February
12, 2010.







| |  | \s\ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.    
| |  | ---------------------------------
| |  |                                  
| |  | RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.        
| |  | TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580







Houston, Texas