alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Firefish, Inc.
for the year ended March 31, 2010,  I,  Harshawardhan  Shetty,  Chief  Executive
Officer,   President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  (Principal  Executive  and
Accounting  Officer) of Firefish,  Inc.,  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

         a)       such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Firefish, Inc. for the year
                  ended March 31, 2010,  fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         b)       the  information  contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
                  of Firefish,  Inc.  for the year ended March 31, 2010,  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of Firefish, Inc.


Date:  December 7, 2010

                                /s/ Harshawardhan Shetty
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Harshawardhan Shetty, Chief Executive Officer,
                                President and Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Louis T. Fox, III, Chief Financial Officer of Hartman Short Term Income Properties XX, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annua Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Louis T. Fox, IIILouis T. Fox, IIIChief Financial Officer





Date:  March 31, 2011
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul W. Kuhn, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avrupa Minerals Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.







Date:  May 14, 2014







/s/  Paul W. Kuhn

Paul W. Kuhn

President and CEO
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Wisconsin GrainProducers, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, J. F. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |               /s/  J. F. Robertson |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | J. F. Robertson                                                                                          |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer*                                                                                |
|   |                                                                                                     |
|   | Dated: August 14, 2008                                                                              |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CEASAR A. COGGER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-30144

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-05494-KLS-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Karen L. Strombom, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 7, 2015** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: NGUYEN and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges and CARNEY,*** District

Judge.

FILED

JUL 09 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge for the

Central District of California, sitting by designation. 
Ceasar Cogger appeals the district court’s order affirming his conviction for

three counts of simple assault. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

1. Cogger claims that the trial court erred in permitting Gustavo Gurrola to

invoke a blanket Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Cogger’s

claim is belied by the record. Because Cogger did not object below, we review for

plain error. See United States v. Gonzalez Becerra, 784 F.3d 514, 518 (9th Cir.

2015). Here, the trial court did not permit a blanket assertion of the privilege. 

Rather, the court adopted a question-by-question approach. And, in evaluating

“the questions, their setting, and the peculiarities of the case,” the court could

determine that Gurrola’s answers could subject him to “a real and appreciable

danger of incrimination” as a member of the armed forces with a duty to report

certain misconduct. United States v. Drollinger, 80 F.3d 389, 392 (9th Cir. 1996)

(quoting United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1240 (9th Cir. 1980)). Thus, the

court did not err in assessing Gurrola’s invocation of his Fifth Amendment

privilege.

2. Cogger also challenges the trial court’s failure to order sua sponte the

government to grant Gurrola immunity in exchange for his testimony at trial. 

Cogger, however, has not shown that the requirements for compelling immunity

were satisfied. See United States v. Straub, 538 F.3d 1147, 1162 (9th Cir. 2008).
AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1960

MBENG AKOH MBU ENOW, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: June 23, 2009 Decided: July 17, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danielle Beach-Oswald, Amy M. Grunder, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anh-Thu P. Mai-Windle, Senior Litigation Counsel, Arthur L. Rabin, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Mbeng Akoh Mbu Enow, a native and citizen of Cameroon, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying relief from removal. In his petition for review, Enow first argues that the Board erred in finding that he failed to prove that his asylum application was timely filed and that he is thus ineligible for asylum. We lack jurisdiction to review this determination pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2006), even in light of the passage of the REAL ID Act of 2005, Pub. L.

No. 109-13, 119 Stat. 231. See Niang v. Gonzales , 492 F.3d 505, 510 n.5 (4th Cir. 2007); Almuhtaseb v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 743, 747-48 (6th Cir. 2006) (collecting cases). Enow also contends that the Board erred in denying his request for withholding of removal. “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic , 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Based on our review of the record, we find that Enow failed to make the requisite showing. Likewise, we find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Enow failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if

23 removed to Cameroon. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2009). We therefore uphold the denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture. Accordingly, we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 399 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of May 7, 2023, through 

May 13, 2023, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2023 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, 

Mr. BABIN, Mr. BACON, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. MEUSER, Ms. 

STEFANIK, Mr. BOST, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. 

LAWLER, Mr. KILEY, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Ms. LETLOW, Mr. GUEST, and 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of May 

7, 2023, through May 13, 2023, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers Week’’. 

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a 

critical component of the criminal justice system of the 

United States; 

Whereas correctional officers play an important role in protecting the right of the public to be safeguarded from 

criminal activity, as with law enforcement officers; 

Whereas correctional officers are responsible for the care, 

custody, and dignity of the inmates charged to their care; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 399 IH 

Whereas correctional officers work under demanding circumstances and face danger and violence in their daily 

work lives; and 

Whereas the first week of May is recognized as ‘‘National 

Correctional Officers Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

3 Correctional Officers Week’’; and 

4 (2) honors all correctional officers for their 

5 service to their communities and States, and to the 

6 Nation. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JULIAN FRISBY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 151 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leslye Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Leslye GrindleLeslye Grindle, Sr. Vice President andChief Financial Officer May 16, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 54 (Monday, March 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): CDC Grants for Public Health Research 
Dissertation, Panel F, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) PAR07-231

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 2 p.m.-5 p.m., May 12, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
``CDC Grants for Public Health Research Dissertation, Panel F, FOA 
PAR07-231.''
    For Further Information Contact: Susan B. Stanton, D.D.S., 
Scientific Review Officer, Office of the Director, Office of the 
Chief Science Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D74, 
Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-4640.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 16, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E9-6216 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6357]



[[Page 12460]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual 
Initiatives Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual 
Initiatives Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, May 14, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives 
Issue Committee will be held Thursday, May 14, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern 
Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. Knispel at 
1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech 
Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

     Dated: March 17, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-6357 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
P. 1


# OAR Box 

# 1107 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 43 ) IV-A- 2 Docket Number: 

# A-81-2 1

Printed 4/11/2008 3:03:46

PM Sheet 43 of 90

# A-8'1-2 1 P. 2


### IV-A- 2 

## EPA-«tou /

o-cm- u i yj 

# Fugitiv e Emissio n Source s ofOrgani c Compound s - Additiona l Informatio n o n Emissions , Emissio n Reductions , an d Cost s 

# 1

Emissio n Standard s an d Engineerin g Divisio n

U.S . ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e o fAir , Nois e an d Radiatio n Offic e o fAi rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1

Apri l 198 2 

# IP. 3

fugitive emissions . Wit hne winformatio n available , EP Acan us e a Leak Detectio n an

d Repai r (LDAR ) mode l whic hbette r represent s observe d fugitiv e emissio n behavior . Th e LDA R model , develope d in September , 1981 , als o i s mor e flexibl e in allowing calculation s fo r differen t type s o f leak detectio n an d repai r programs . 1. 3 SUMMAR

Y O F RESULT S Th e majo r result s o f EPA' s revie wo f th e technica l basi s presente d i n the BID , ne winformatio n whic hha s become available , an d publi c comment s ar e summarize d here . Detail s an d reasoning supporting th e result s mayb e foun d in the corresponding sections . 1.3. 1 Emissio n Factor s (Sectio n 2 ) Th e emissio n factor s whic hEP Aplan s t o us e in estimating fugitiv e emission s o f VO C fro mSOCM I ar e show

n in Tabl e 1-1 . Theywer e develope d b y using (1 ) SOCM I leak frequencie s (i.e. , numbe r o f leaking an d non-leaking fugitiv e emissio n sources ) an d (2 ) emissio n factor s determine d in petroleu m refinerie s an

d SOCM I unit s fo r leakin g an d non-leaking fugitiv e emissio n sources . Th e resulting emissio n factor s ar e lowe r tha n th e emissio n factor s presente d in the BI D fo r al l equipmen t component s excep t flange s an d sampling connections . TABL E 1-1 . EMISSIO NFACTOR S FO

R AVERAG E SOCM I UNIT , kg/hr/sourc e

Sourc e Averag e SOCM I Emissio n Facto r (kg/hr/source ) Pump s - ligh t liqui d

- heav yliqui d Valve s - ga s

- ligh t liqui d

- heav yliqui d Compressor s Safety/relie f valve s - Flange s Open-ende d line s Sampling connection s 

### ga s 0.049 4 0.021 4 0.005 6 0.007 1 0.0002 3 0.22 8 0.10 4 0.0008 3 0.001 7 0.015 0


### 1-4P. 4



### TABL E 5-17 . COST S FOR A NOPEN-ENDE D LIN E CA P
On e 2.5c mscrewe d valv e $3 0 Installatio n 1 5

Tota l (las t quarte r 197 8 dollars ) $4 5 Annualize d Cost s Cap s fo r Open-Ende d Lines 3 

### $ 7 Maintenanc e & Misc . 4 Tota l ($/year)$l l

a 

### Base d o n 1 0 yea r equipmen t lif e and 1 0 percen t interes t (CR F = 0.163) , Base d o n 9 percen t o f tota l capita l cost .

5-2 9
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Camarion C. BEAL, Appellant.

No. ED 106095

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: April 23, 2019

Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market St., Ste 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Justin A. Moody, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*164*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Camarion Beal ("Beal") appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of murder in the first degree, two instances of armed criminal action, and domestic assault in the first, second, and third degree. Beal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his first-degree murder conviction, claiming that the State failed to establish that Beal caused Marvin Carter's death. Because there was sufficient evidence to sustain Beal's first-degree murder conviction, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).