alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1(a)

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of KB Financial Group Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify,
to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: April 24, 2017 |  |  |  | /s/ Jong Kyoo Yoon                  
|                      |  |  |  | Jong Kyoo Yoon                      
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to KB Financial Group Inc. and will be retained by KB Financial Group Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

Exhibit 13.1(b)

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of KB Financial Group Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify,
to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 24, 2017 |  | /s/ Jae Keun Lee       
|                      |  | Jae Keun Lee           
|                      |  | Managing Director and  
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to KB Financial Group Inc. and will be retained by KB Financial Group Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed January 3, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00903-CV

___________

FERNANDO CHAPA D/B/A FULL SERVICE, INC., Appellant

V.

LONE STAR DISPOSAL, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 541012103

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for County Civil Court at Law No. 3 informed this court that appellant had not 

made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On November 8, 2013, 

the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those 

issues that do not require a reporters record unless appellant, within 15 days of 

notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App.

P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 
Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty 

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court 

will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Benjamin A. CHATMAN, Appellant.

ED 106211

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: October 30, 2018

Bobby E. Bailey, 4387 Laclede Avenue, Suite A, St. Louis, MO 63108, Nancy A. McKerrow, 1400 Forum Blvd., Suite 1C #203, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*929***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Benjamin A. Chatman (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.3








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Redwood Mortgage Investors IX, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redwood Mortgage Investors IX, LLC and will be retained by Redwood Mortgage Investors IX, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

















/s/ Michael R. Burwell


___________________________


Michael R. Burwell, President,


Redwood Mortgage Corporation,


Manager


March 30, 2011
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ali Yazdchi v. Makansam Inc d/b/a Ideal Towing

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00008

- CV

Trial court case number: 1133779

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 3 of Harris County

The Court dismissed this appeal by opinion dated March 12, 2020 because appellant has been adjudicated a vexatious litigant and the appeal was not from a prefiling order or one approved by the local administrative judge. Although a ppellant had not yet filed a motion for rehearing, he filed and was granted three extensions before he filed a notice claiming that he had obtained permission to appeal. On August 25, 2020, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and requesting a su pplemental clerk’s record containing the order granting appellant permission to appeal. On September 15, 2020, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing an order granting appellant permission to appeal.

The Court, on its own motion, reinstates th is appeal on the active docket, withdraws the opinion and judgment of March 12, 2020, and sets the reporter’s record due 30 days from the

date of this order . The clerk’s record contains multiple statements of inability to afford payment of costs on appeal . The record contains no written order overruling appellant’s claim of inability.

See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a) (party who files statement of inability cannot be required to pay costs unless trial court signs written order as provided by the rule).

Accord ingly, the Clerk of this Court shall designate appellant as indigent and the record shall be filed at no cost to appellant.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___ Justice Peter Kelly

________________________

 Acting individually 

###  Acting for the Court

Panel includes Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.

Date: ___ December 14, 2021

____
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: August 7, 2008
    
    /s/ JAMES HYATT

President,Chief Executive Officer, and
DirectorDate: August 7, 2008
    
    /s/ WILLIAM KOZIEL

William KozielChief Financial Officer(chief accounting officer)Treasurer and Secretary
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Carroll Shelby International Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John Luft, President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August  16, 2004 | /s/    JOHN LUFT                                 |   |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | John Luft, President, Chief Financial Officer and Director |

 

----
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation



 Exhibit 4.2 
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 
 OF 
 RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
 OF 
 EXTREME NETWORKS, INC. 
 (Pursuant to Sections 242 and 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware) 
 I, Gordon Stitt, Chief Executive Officer of Extreme Networks, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), DO
HEREBY CERTIFY AS FOLLOWS: 
 1. That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting of its members, adopted a
resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation: 
 RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation be amended by changing the first paragraph of Section A of the Article thereof numbered “FOURTH” so that, as amended, said first paragraph of Section A of the
Article thereof numbered “FOURTH” shall be and read as follows: 
  

	 	“A.	The Corporation is authorized to issue a total of 752,000,000 shares of stock in two classes designated respectively “Preferred Stock” and “Common
Stock”. The total number of shares of all series of Preferred Stock that the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 2,000,000 and the total number of shares of Common Stock that the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is
750,000,000. All of the authorized shares shall have a par value of $0.001.” 

 2. That the stockholders of
the Corporation, at a meeting and vote of the stockholders, have given consent to said amendment in accordance with the provisions of Section 216 of the DGCL. 
 3. That the aforesaid amendments were duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 216 of the DGCL. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by a duly authorized officer on this 7th day of
December, 2000. 
  

			
	EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gordon Stitt

		 	Gordon Stitt, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golf Two, Inc. a Delaware corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
David Bennett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golf Two, Inc., and will be retained by Golf Two, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ David Bennett
--------------------------
David Bennett
Chief Financial Officer
August 15, 2005
#### F. O. Trump *v.*State Road Commission

(CC 536)

Submitted November 6, 1935.

Decided November 26, 1935.

*D. Grove Moler,*for plaintiff.

*Homer A. Holt,*Attorney General, and *J. F. Bouchelle,*Assistant Attorney General, for defendant.

Kenna, Judge :

F. O. Trump brought an action of trespass on the case in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County against the State Road Commission, alleging damages resulting from the alteration of the grade of a state road. A demurrer to his declaration was sustained, and the following questions of law arising thereon were certified to this Court:

First: Can the State Road Commission of West Virginia be sued upon the grounds set forth in the declaration herein?

Second: Do section 1, article 2, and sections 5 and 6, article 4, chapter 40, 1933 First Extraordinary Session, authorize a suit against the State Road Commission?

Third: Does chapter 40, 1933 First Extraordinary Session, repeal section 4, article 4, chapter 17, Code of 1931 ?

Fourth: Is the State Road Commission liable for the cost of acquiring rights-of-way for a state road and damages to *626land caused by its construction, repair and maintenance thereof, acquired or damaged prior to May 16, 1933 *¶*

Fifth: Does the statute of limitations bar recovery for wrongs and injuries declared on?

Going at once to the certified question which, in our opinion, disposes of the case here, we find that the fourth question propounded is, in effect, whether the State Road Commission is liable for the damages declared on incurred by the plaintiff prior to the effective date of Chapter 40 of the Acts of the First Extraordinary Session of the Legislature of 1933, sometimes referred to as the secondary road law. It is not necessary, we believe, for us to decide, in this case, whether the act last referred to effected a change in existing law with reference to the right to sue the State Road Commission in an action of tort. The right of action here, according to the question certified, arose prior to the effective date of that act. Therefore, at the time the right of action arose, under the authority of *Kinney*v. *County*Court, 110 W. Va. 17, 156 S. E. 748, and other West Virginia cases readily available, the right of action lay, if at all, against the county court of Jefferson County exclusively. See also *Hatcher*v. *County Court,*115 W. Va. 95, 174 S. E. 690. We, therefore, hold that the action of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County in sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration must be affirmed solely on this ground.

The disposition made of the fourth question certified, we think, necessarily prevents our dealing with the other questions certified. They are not before us.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of ANTIVIRAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Bill Piu Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.      By: /s/ Bill Piu Chan, CEO  Date:March 31, 2010
Exhibit 32.02   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Bloggerwave, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ulrik Svane Thomsen, I, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Ulrik Svane Thomsen By: Ulrik Svane Thomsen Chief Financial Officer  Dated: November 18, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Transition Report of Grow Condos, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the transition period ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Transition Report"), We, Wayne A. Zallen, Chief Executive Officer, and Joann Z. Cleckner, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Transition Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Transition Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:  October 14, 2014





/s/ Wayne A. Zallen


_________________________________________


Wayne A. Zallen


Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Joann Z. Cleckner


_________________________________________


Joann Z. Cleckner


Chief Financial Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 284 

Commending and congratulating the University of Connecticut Men’s Basketball Team for winning the 2023 NCAA Men’s Basketball Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2023 

Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. 

HIMES, and Mrs. HAYES) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Commending and congratulating the University of Connecticut Men’s Basketball Team for winning the 2023 

NCAA Men’s Basketball Championship. 

Whereas, on Monday, April 3, 2023, the University of Connecticut Men’s Basketball Team (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘UConn Huskies’’) won the 2023 NCAA 

Men’s Basketball Championship with a 76–59 win over 

the San Diego State Aztecs at NRG Stadium in Houston, 

Texas; 

Whereas this is the UConn Huskies fifth national championship, continuing the team’s undefeated streak in national 

championship games; 

Whereas all five titles were earned since 1999, a feat no other 

college team has surpassed; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 284 IH 

Whereas Adama Sanogo was named the Most Outstanding 

Player of the tournament, averaging 19.7 points per 

game with four double-doubles; and 

Whereas the UConn Huskies won every NCAA tournament 

game by 13 points or more, becoming only the fifth team 

in history to do so: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the University of Connecticut 

3 Men’s Basketball Team for winning the 2023 NCAA 

4 Men’s Basketball Championship; 

5 (2) congratulates the fans, students, and fac6 ulty of the University of Connecticut; and 

7 (3) respectfully requests that the Clerk of the 

8 House of Representatives transmit an enrolled copy 

9 of this resolution to— 

10 (A) the President of the University of Con11 necticut, Radenka Maric; and 

12 (B) the Head Coach of the University of 

13 Connecticut Men’s Basketball Team, Dan Hur14 ley. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
William BRAY, Respondent, v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION, Appellant.

No. ED 106361

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: October 30, 2018

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kevin H. Dunaway, 1949 E. Sunshine, Suite 1-130, Springfield, MO 65804.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: James J. Sievers, Jr., 8131 Manchester Road, Brentwood, MO 63144.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

CentiMark Corporation ("Employer") appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying its motion under Section 287.470 to review the permanent and total disability award that the Commission previously entered in favor of William Bray ("Employee"), its former employee. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).