alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard P. Kundrat,  Chief  Financial  Officer of NuVim,  Inc, Inc.,  certify
that:

1.  I have  reviewed  this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of NuVim,  Inc. for
the period ended September 30, 2007;

2.  Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a  material  fact  or omit  to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any  change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's

<PAGE>

ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007

/s/ Richard P. Kundrat
-------------------------
Richard P. Kundrat
Chief Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2734

_____________________________
F ERNANDO M ARRERO ,
Petitioner
,

v.

F LORIDA C OMMISSION ON O FFENDER R EVIEW , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

July 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and aut horized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Fernando Marrero, pro se
, P etitioner

. Rana Wallace, General Counsel; Thomas A. Klein and Mark J. Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallaha ssee , for Respondent

.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0701 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM073AD

727 - 57 - 0112, R4 --- 10/29/92

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
### Regulatory Evaluation
Docket No. 

### FAA- ") 

# 0 I

# 5

- 0 ;(

# lff; Directorate Identifier: 

### -AD



## ~0

# tt./WM-/'13-AD

((vou make changes to the 1 • a/ues in the table hulow. you 

### must u n.wru the lola/.\' update accordingly. 

### ll rhe y do no/ , click 

### (or Tuh) into 

### wul rht!n our 

### ofrhe changed cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g
., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

# u.s. for U
.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Same as Exisintg 0
.0 

## ' $0 ')[/ 0 

### AD lit it 1111(1 (> II ,1()( I( ( ()(! ll ): 1) If I ()1 I () t il I 

### '· II lit' ; 

# " () I} () II II) \ I I .()1 I 1)1)1) 

## ,,, I I 

### .., I I (I ( I

**·~** II 0(1 () (Jij I l}( I I, 11(1 i ; 

# " ( j ()(I \ (JI)() I I ill 1) 1 1(.1 

## ' ()\ (J H

·H (II ) I!
J (l( U.th I'

**~** () (I(' f 

# " (I,WI II 1 1 I I .; II 

### u (Ill } till 

## ' ,I fill \ II ! I ll lit I ,,I( (I IJI I ' I ()I 1 ', (I (!() I ' (I IJII The known number ofproducts in compliance: 

### Same as Exis Total Costs ofcompliance for U.S
. fleet: $ 0 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $0 On-Condition Costs:



# ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g
., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing, and closeup) I ' 

# ,,

, I II 

### ' II ' 

# '"' II•

,, 1)1' 

# ,, Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might no/be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs):

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • YES* 

# D NO 

# k8J *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? , . YES* 

# D NO 

# k8J *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities? Explain for either a Yes or No

# answer**~** YES 

# D NO 

# k8J Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation?

- YES* 

# D NO 

# k8J *Explanation :
No. 85157 

# Fl OCT 1 1 2U1i q_i- LADE 8ROWN OrÅ pRENECOURT DE'Y GL RK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JIM MUELLER,AN INDIVIDUAL; JOHN MUELLER, AN INDVIDUAL; MACHNV, LLC;ACRES CULTIVATION, LLC;AND CURALEAF, INC., Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, INAND FOR THE COUNTYOF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE SUSAN JOHNSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and DGMD REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC;ARMPRO, LLC; ZHANG SPRINGS, LV, LLC; PRODIGY HOLDINGS, LLC; AND LAS VEGAS GREEN ORGANICS, LLC, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDERDENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to withdraw admissions. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observingthat the party seeking writ reliefbears the burden ofshowing such reliefis warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole



## 2 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1917AParraguirre

Herndon J. Sr.J. discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). We therefore ORDER the petition DENIED.1

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge GreenbergTraurig, LLP/LasVegas Peterson Baker, PLLC Hymanson & Hyinanson Eighth District Court Clerk

1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision ofthis matter under a general order ofassignment.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
10) I947A 2
**Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Principal Financial OfficerI, Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;    (b) [reserved]    (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and    (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        September 18, 2007 /s/ Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.         Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.         Chief Financial Officer      Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.      (Principal Financial Officer)
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer E-2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Federal Consistency Appeal by Broadwater Energy LLC and 
Broadwater Pipeline LLC

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 
Department of Commerce (Commerce).

ACTION: Notice of closure--administrative appeal decision record.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This announcement provides notice that the decision record has 
closed for an administrative appeal filed with the Department of 
Commerce by Broadwater Energy LLC and Broadwater Pipeline LLC 
(collectively, ``Broadwater'').

DATES: The decision record for Broadwater's administrative appeal 
closed on February 13, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Materials from the appeal record are available at the NOAA 
Office of General Counsel for Ocean Services, 1305 East-West Highway, 
Room 6111, Silver Spring, MD 20910 and on the following Web site: 
http://www.ogc.doc.gov/czma.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamon Bollock, Attorney-Advisor, NOAA 
Office of the General Counsel, 301-713-2967, NOAA Office of the General 
Counsel, 301-713-2967, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e681858995c88f8897938f948f8395a688898787c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3255515d411c5b5c43475b405b5741725c5d53531c555d44">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 2008, Broadwater filed notice of 
an appeal with the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), pursuant to the 
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA), 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., and 
implementing regulations found at 15 CFR part 930, subpart H. 
Broadwater appealed an objection by the State of New York to its 
proposed construction of a liquefied natural gas (``LNG'') terminal, 
sendout pipeline, and appurtenant facilities in the New York state 
waters of Long Island Sound.
    Decisions for CZMA administrative appeals are based on information 
contained in a decision record. Under the CZMA, the decision record 
must close no later than 220 days after notice of the appeal was first 
published in the Federal Register. See 16 U.S.C. 1465. Consistent with 
this deadline, the Broadwater appeal decision record closed on February 
13, 2009. No further information or briefs will be considered in 
deciding this appeal.
    Additional information about the Broadwater appeal and the CZMA 
appeals process is available from the Department of Commerce CZMA 
appeals Web site http://www.ogc.doc.gov/czma.htm.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No. 11.419 Coastal Zone 
Management Program Assistance.)

    Dated: March 6, 2009.
Joel La Bissonniere,
Assistant General Counsel for Ocean Services, National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration.
 [FR Doc. E9-5509 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-09-008] 

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

March 24, 2009 at 11 a.m. 

# Place: 

Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification list. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1021 (Review) (Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings From China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before April 1, 2009.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: March 17, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

 [FR Doc. E9-6088 Filed 3-17-09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130828 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130828 

 COA: 264819 

Kent CC: 03-006445-FC 

MICHAEL ANGELO HAMBRICK, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0918 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2006 

 Clerk
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-075 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
|   | 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      September 13, 2010 | /s/ Guy Brusciano                                  |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Guy      Brusciano, President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer |
|                           |  and      Director                            |
|                           | (Principal      Executive Officer)                 |

----
#### Luz Perez et al., Respondents, v Arturo Perez et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[719 NYS2d 588]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Arturo Perez and Carla Perez appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated March 3, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to substitute counsel and restore the action to the trial calendar, and denied as academic their cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs’ motion and restoring this action to the trial calendar *(see, Associated Aviation Underwriters v Island Helicopter Corp.,*229 AD2d 409; *see generally, Marco v Sachs,*10 NY2d 542). Bracken, Acting P. J., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Tony Lavel RICHARDSON

No. COA18-855

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 18, 2019

NO ERROR.