alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11645 and #11646] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 3. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Arkansas (FEMA-1819-DR), dated 02/06/2009. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Winter Storm.                     

*Incident Period:*                         01/26/2009 through 01/30/2009.                     

*Effective Date:*                         02/24/2009.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/07/2009.                     

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/06/2009.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for private non-profit organizations in the State of Arkansas, dated 02/06/2009, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster. 

*Primary Counties:*                     Pope.                 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6058 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.2

                       CITIBANK CREDIT CARD ISSUANCE TRUST

                   CERTIFICATE OF AN ISSUER AUTHORIZED OFFICER
               DELIVERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 1104 OF THE INDENTURE


Reference is hereby made to the Indenture dated as of September 26, 2000 (as
amended and supplemented through the date hereof, the "Indenture") between
Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust (the "Issuer") and Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas (formerly Bankers Trust Company), as Trustee (the "Trustee").
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have their respective meanings as
set forth in the Indenture.

Pursuant to Section 1104 of the Indenture, the undersigned Issuer Authorized
Officer does hereby certify that:

     1. The undersigned is an Issuer Authorized Officer who is duly authorized
pursuant to the Indenture to execute and deliver this certificate to the Trustee
and the Rating Agencies and who has read the Indenture as it relates to the
matters set forth herein.

     2. A review of the activities of the Issuer during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2004 and of the Issuer's performance under the Indenture and under
the terms of the Notes was conducted under my supervision. Such review was
conducted to the extent I deemed necessary to enable me to express an informed
opinion as to the matters set forth herein.

     3. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has
complied in all material respects with all conditions and covenants under the
Indenture throughout such year and no default in the fulfillment of any such
condition or covenant has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
paragraph 4 below.

     4. The following is a description of each default in the fulfillment by the
Issuer of conditions and covenants under the Indenture known to me to have been
made by the Issuer during the year ended December 31, 2004, which description
sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken,
if any, by the Issuer to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
of each such default:

                                      None.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this
15th day of March, 2005.


                                     /s/ Susan J. Sexton
                                     -------------------
                                     Susan J. Sexton
                                     Issuer Authorized Officer
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marlon GRIFFIN, Appellant.

No. ED 106092

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: April 2, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.

FOR RESPONDENT: JOSH HAWLEY, Garrick Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Marlon Griffin ("Appellant") appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo., armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, and distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211. Appellant, a persistent offender, was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole and concurrent terms of imprisonment of fifteen and seven years, respectively.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose *682would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 52-033-COL; ASLBP No. 09-880-05-COL-BD01]

                    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the Commission's regulations,                     *see*10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the following proceeding:                

## Detroit Edison Company

#### (Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3)

                    This proceeding concerns a Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing dated March 9, 2009 from Beyond Nuclear,                     *et al.*, that was submitted in response to a January 8, 2009 Notice of Hearing and Opportunity to Petition for Leave to Intervene on a Combined License for the Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3 (74 FR 836). The petitioners challenge the application filed by Detroit Edison Company pursuant to Subpart C of 10 CFR Part 52 for a combined license for Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3, which would be located in Monroe County, Michigan.                

The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Ronald M. Spritzer, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Michael F. Kennedy, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Randall J. Charbeneau, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of March 2009.

E. Roy Hawkens,

Chief Administrative Judge,Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-6555 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the quarterly report of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter A. Edison, Chairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: September 18, 2007 /s/ Peter A. Edison        Peter A. Edison        Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer     Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
Marlyn STANDIFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80920

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 30, 2019

Natalie Hull Hoge, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Two: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Marlyn Standifer appeals from the denial of his post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Standifer argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying *169his motion because trial counsel was ineffective for conceding during closing argument that Standifer, who was charged as an accomplice, was in the getaway car without arguing that all of the essential elements of attempted robbery and burglary were not supported by the State's evidence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Board of Directors Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.52 
 Domino’s Pizza, Inc. 
 Independent Director Compensation Schedule

 The following table sets forth the compensation received by independent directors of Domino’s Pizza, Inc.: 
  

			
	 Compensation Type

	  	 Amount


	Annual Retainer	  	$46,000 per year
	Board of Directors Meeting Fee	  	$2,000 per meeting
	Committee Meeting Fee	  	$1,500 per meeting
	Audit Chairperson Retainer	  	$20,000 per year
	Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer	  	$15,000 per year
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson Retainer	  	$10,000 per year
	Annual Stock Option Grant	  	6,000 shares per year
	Annual Restricted Stock Grant	  	6,000 shares per year
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

** **

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB of East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC (the “Company”)for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Goblirsch, GeneralManager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael Goblirsch        |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | General  Manager             |
|   | Dated:  August 15, 2005 |

 

----
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 19, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1247 Lower Tribunal No. 17-2158

________________ 

### Richard Namon, Jr. , Appellant,

vs. 

### Barbara Namon , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge. Richard Namon, in proper person. Muir Law, PLLC, and William Douglas Muir, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. as Tr., 81 So. 3d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Where there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or (b)(3), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”); Johnson v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. Americas, 248 So. 3d 1205, 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (“[P]resenting an adequate record—one that demonstrates not only what evidence was presented below but also which arguments were preserved—remains the appellant’s burden in an appeal of a summary judgment.”); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”); Kohn v. City of Miami Beach, 611 So. 2d 538, 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (“We conclude that it is a mistake to hold a pro se litigant to a lesser standard than a reasonably competent attorney.”).
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 1665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-608]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XM52

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council); Public 
Meetings; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council will convene 
public meetings. The original document published on Tuesday, January 6, 
2009 and this document adds additional discussions that will take place 
at the Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 8:30 am-12:00 pm & 1:30 pm-3:00 pm 
meeting and is corrected in the SUMMARY section. All other information 
remains unchanged.

DATES: The meetings will be held January 26-29, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Hollywood Casino, 711 
Hollywood Blvd., Bay St. Louis, MS 39520.
    Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 2203 
North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL, 33607.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Leard, Interim Executive 
Director, Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; telephone: 813-
348-1630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 6, 2009, in FR Doc. E8-31438, on 
page 432, in the third column, the Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 8:30 am-
12:00 pm & 1:30 pm -3:00 pm meeting is corrected to read as follows:
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
    8:30 am-12:00 pm & 1:30 pm-3:00 pm--The Reef Fish Management 
Committee will meet to discuss the Options Paper on Amendment/
Regulatory Amendment and DEIS to Address Longline/Turtle Interactions; 
Results of Referendum and Final Action on Reef Fish Amendment 29; White 
Paper on Pros and Cons of Red Snapper For-Hire Sector Management; and 
Consideration of (re)allocation Issues for those Species in Reef Fish 
Amendments 30A and 30B using the Allocation Policy. The committee may 
also discuss and make recommendations for a Gulf of Mexico Angling 
Reporting System (GOMARS) to improve recreational data collection, 
particularly for red snapper. Finally, the committee will also receive 
a presentation on a device to reduce release mortality and may discuss 
goliath grouper activities.

    Dated: January 9, 2009.
William Chappell,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-608 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                          000840402
<NAME>                        GREKA Energy Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,093,319
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,025,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,343,852
<INVENTORY>                                    4,253,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,983,973
<PP&E>                                         77,415,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,128,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 84,213,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,282,738
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       33,378,323
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   84,213,683
<SALES>                                        29,137,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               29,137,810
<CGS>                                          17,820,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,820,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,229,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,859,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,346,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,346,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,367,082
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .69




</TABLE>
Order filed March 8, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00032

- CV

____________ GERONIMO ENERGY LLC. , Appellant

V.
STEVE GERDES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 57404



### ORDER
This is an appeal from a final judgment signed December 22, 2017. The judgment grants a motion to dismiss under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 27.003. An appeal, whether interlocutory or not, from a trial court order on
a motion to dismiss under chapter 27 is expedited. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 27.008(b). An appeal statutorily required to be expedited is an accelerated appeal. SeeTex. R. App. P. 28.1(a). The notice of appeal in an accelerated appeal must be filed
within 20 da ys after the date the judgment or order is signed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 28.1(b). In this case, the notice of appeal was due by January 11, 2018. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until January 12, 2018.

A motion for extension of time is neces sarily implied when the perfecting
instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appe llant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before March 19, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM