alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5626 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5626

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 802 South Carrier Parkway in Grand Prairie, Texas, as the 
           ``Alexander McRae Dechman Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2006

Mr. Marchant (for himself, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Brady 
   of Texas, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Carter, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. 
  Culberson, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Gonzalez, Ms. 
Granger, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Hall, Mr. 
 Hensarling, Mr. Hinojosa, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Ms. Eddie Bernice 
 Johnson of Texas, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. McCaul of Texas, Mr. 
Neugebauer, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Paul, Mr. Poe, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
  Smith of Texas, and Mr. Thornberry) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 802 South Carrier Parkway in Grand Prairie, Texas, as the 
           ``Alexander McRae Dechman Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALEXANDER MCRAE DECHMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 802 South Carrier Parkway in Grand Prairie, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Alexander McRae Dechman Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Alexander 
McRae Dechman Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harold Steenwerth, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 879]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Leone, J.), rendered September 12, 1996, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*642Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was denied his right to be present at all material stages of the trial by his exclusion from sidebar discussions during voir dire is without merit. With respect to those sidebar conferences at which he was not present, the defendant made an intelligent, knowing, and voluntary waiver of his right to be present *(see, People v Stokes,*216 AD2d 337).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




First Amendment to Restated Employment Agreement




     This First Amendment to Restated Employment Agreement is made effective on the 31th
day of July 2009, between Coeur d’Alene Mines Corporation (“Company”) and K. Leon Hardy
(“Employee”).



     Whereas, the parties executed an Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2008 (the
“Employment Agreement”), and



     Whereas the Employment Agreement was further amended and then subsequently restated effective
December 31, 2008 (“Restated Employment Agreement”) whereby the current term runs through June 30,
2010, and



     Whereas the parties desire to further extend the term of the Restated Employment Agreement as
contemplated by the Restated Employment Agreement and as set forth below;



NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained to be kept
and performed by the parties hereto, the parties agree as follows:




1. Term Of Employment. The Restated Employment Agreement shall be amended in Section 2 to
read that the term of employment shall be extended to the 31st day of July 2011, unless
sooner terminated as provided in the Restated Employment Agreement. It is further agreed that the
Restated Employment Agreement may be further considered for an additional one year extension during
the month of July, 2010 to the end that the parties may once again be bound to a two year duration
of the Agreement. It is understood, however, that termination can occur in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph 7 of the Restated Employment Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this First Amendment to the Restated Employment Agreement.




2. Compensation. The Restated Employment Agreement shall be amended in Section 3 (c) to
read that the Employee shall have an opportunity to earn a bonus during each calendar year targeted
to be 45% of Employee’s then current annual salary, which, at the date of this Agreement, is the
potential sum of $103,500 and a maximum of $207,000 (AIP). In addition, Employee shall be eligible
to earn an award under the Company’s long-term incentive plan with a target level of 140% or a
potential
$322,000(LTIP). Such bonuses are at the discretion of the board of directors




 









 








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to the Restated Employment
Agreement as of the day and year first written above.




Coeur d’Alene Mines Corporation




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	By  	/s/
Dennis E. Wheeler	 
	 	Dennis E. Wheeler, President and CEO 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	/s/
K. Leon Hardy	 
	 	Employee
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Rawles, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 17]

Judgment, Su*268preme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J., on CPL 190.50 motion; Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered October 20, 1999, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 years, 6 years, and 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence, viewed as a whole, clearly established defendant’s accessorial liability.

Since it is undisputed that the requisite request to testify before the Grand Jury was never filed, defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 190.50 (5) (a) was properly denied *(see, People v Saldana,*161 AD2d 441, *lv denied*76 NY2d 944). Defendant’s original attorney’s concession that he failed to effectuate his client’s expressed desire to testify before the Grand Jury does not entitle defendant to reversal under the circumstances here presented *(People v Wiggins,*89 NY2d 872; *People v Hook,*246 AD2d 470, *lv denied*92 NY2d 853). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Gary McGaha, President and C.E.O., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
17

 
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 14, 2007              /s/ Gary McGaha   Gary McGaha, President and   Chief Executive Officer  
18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XO18

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold a meeting of its Marine Mammal Advisory Committee (MMAC).

# DATES:

The MMAC meeting will be held on April 6-7, 2009, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Council Office Conference Room, 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI; telephone: (808) 522-8220.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; telephone: (808) 522-8220.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The MMAC will review recent research and activities related to cetacean interactions and depredation in longline fisheries, and produce recommendations for future research and activities.

## Special Accommodations

                    These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids                           ( print page 11717)                        should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, (808) 522-8220 (voice) or (808) 522-8226 (fax), at least five days prior to the meeting date.                

Authority:16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: March 16, 2009

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. E9-5938 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5920]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,425]


Pass & Seymour/Legrand, Whitsett, NC; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 27, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Pass & Seymour/Legrand, Whitsett, North Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5920 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-1203WA

_____________

Sherman L. Gibbs, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Shirley S. Chater, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: May 1, 1997

 Filed: May 5, 1997

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Sherman L. Gibbs appeals the judgment of the district court

affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Gibbs’s applications

for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.

After careful review of the administrative record and the parties’

briefs, we agree with the conclusions reached by the district court

and affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification of CEO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002

 

*I certify that this periodic report containing theissuer’s financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78mor 78o(d)) and that information contained in this periodic report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the issuer.*

 

 
| * * | * *                      | *By:*  | */s/  John F. Coger*                |
|----------|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|     |                          |   |                                |
|     |                          |   | President,  Chief Executive Officer |
|     |                          |   |                                |
|     | Date:  May 17, 2010 |   |                                |

 

43

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Mark A. Jackson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noble Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 9, 2006   /s/ MARK A. JACKSON     Mark A. Jackson  President and Chief Operating Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer  of Noble Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         205,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (160,933)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,019
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,119
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,261)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,261)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000091

17-DEC-2013

09:20 AM
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JACOB FRANCOIS , Appellant,

v.

LIBRARY SQUARE ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2694

[ July 11, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Martin J. Bidwill , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 16

- 001715(05)

.
Jacob Francois, Port St. Lucie, pro se.

Joseph B. Lancos of Tripp Scott, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

The trial court erred when it denied the defendant’s motion to set aside the foreclosure sale. We vacate the sale and remand.

Following entry of final judgment of foreclosure

, the defendant filed a timely motion for rehearing

. While his motion for rehearing was pending, the clerk of court enforced the final judgment by conducting a foreclosure auction and selling the property to the highest bidder (a third party). The defendant’s subsequent motion to set aside the sale was deni ed.

While a motion for rehearing is pending, the trial court retains “complete control of its decree with the power to alter or change it

. . . . ” State ex rel. Owens v. Pearson , 156 So. 2d 4, 7 (Fla. 1963). For this reason, it is well settled that “ enforcement of a final judgment is suspended” by the filing of a timely motion for rehearing. 944 CWELT

- 2007 LLC v. Bank of Am., N.A. , 194 So. 3d 470, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016 ).

Here , the foreclosure sale must be set aside because it was conducted while the defendant’s timely motion for rehearing directed at the2 foreclosure judgment was pending. See

, e.g. , Diaz v. U.S. Bank, N.A. , 239 So. 3d 151, 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

The defendant also appeals the trial court’s eventual denial of his motion for rehear ing. We affirm the denial of his motion for rehearing and reverse only the order denying his motion to set aside the sale for the reasons stated . We vacate the foreclosure sale and remand for the court
to begin the sale process anew. See Hoffman v. Bank United, N.A. , 137 So. 3d 1039 (Mem) (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

G ERBER , C.J., G ROSS and C IKLIN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Goldland Holdings Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:



1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2013(the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Pierre Quilliam



Pierre Quilliam,

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)



Date:  April 15, 2014