alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Principal Financial OfficerI, Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) [reserved](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     December 13, 2005 /s/ Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.              Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.          Chief Financial Officer          Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.          (Principal Financial Officer)  
26
STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Karen A. BACKUES, Respondent.

WD 80438

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

OPINION FILED: November 20, 2018

Gregory Barnes, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Kent Gipson, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Edward R. Ardini, JJ.

Thomas H. Newton, Judge *893This court is reconsidering the decision in *State of Missouri v. Karen A. Backues* at the direction of the Missouri Supreme Court's October 30, 2018, order re-transferring the case. We decided the case on direct appeal rather than a writ of mandamus that the State filed in our court while the appeal was pending.

In a similar factual circumstance, *State ex rel. Fite v. Johnson,*530 S.W.3d 508 (Mo. banc 2017), the Missouri Supreme Court held that the trial court erred in granting the defendant's Rule 29.07(d) motion and allowing the defendant to withdraw a plea of guilty for felony stealing. *Id.* at 510. The State filed an appeal and a writ of prohibition simultaneously. The court decided to dismiss the appeal and resolve the issue by writ.1

In our case, a writ division denied the writ of mandamus and a three-judge panel decided the case on direct appeal. The Missouri Supreme Court granted transfer of the case and then re-transferred it to us for reconsideration, citing *Fite**.* The Missouri Supreme Court's order also stated that "Review is by Writ of Prohibition."

Upon reconsideration and review of the *Fite* decision, because our case was decided by direct appeal as opposed to the writ, we dismiss this appeal.2

Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., and Edward R. Ardini, J. concur.

1

"Missouri appellate court[s] have repeatedly exercised jurisdiction over appeals from the denial of motions to withdraw guilty pleas under Rule 29.07(d), where the motions were filed subsequent to the defendant's sentencing." *State v. Wilson* , 527 S.W.3d 908, 911 (Mo. App. E.D. 2017) (quoting *McCoy v. State* , 456 S.W.3d 887, 892 (Mo. App. W.D. 2015) ); *see also* , *e.g.* , *Gray v. State* , 498 S.W.3d 522, 527-28 n.8 (Mo. App. W.D. 2016) ; *State v. Onate* , 398 S.W.3d 102, 107 n.6 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013) ; *Jack v. State* , 354 S.W.3d 659, 659 (Mo. App. S.D. 2011) ; *State v. Ison* , 270 S.W.3d 444, 446-47 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008) ; *Elam v. State* , 210 S.W.3d 216, 219 & n.9 (Mo. App. W.D. 2006) (dictum); *State v. Johnson* , 172 S.W.3d 900, 901 n.3 (Mo. App. S.D. 2005) ; *State v. Thomas* , 96 S.W.3d 834, 838 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002) ; *State v. Fensom* , 69 S.W.3d 550, 551 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002) (dictum). This case involves a circuit court's *grant* of a post-sentencing Rule 29.07(d) motion, not the *denial* of such a motion. Nevertheless, in light of *Fite* , and the supreme court's re-transfer order in this case, it is unclear whether our prior decisions exercising appellate jurisdiction over the denial of a post-sentencing Rule 29.07(d) motion should continue to be followed.

2

After reconsideration of our opinion issued on July 3, 2018, because of the retransfer order by the Missouri Supreme Court on October 30, 2018, we withdraw our previous opinion.

--------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Ferrer, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 569]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Collins, J.), rendered on or about July 23, 1998, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appel*417late Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.
#### Lau Lee Chan et al., Appellants, v Alex Mikhalov et al., Defendants, and Rita Mushaev, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Laura Mushaev and Another, Infants, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 585]

In an action to recover damages for *personal injuries, etc.,*the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), dated March 30, 2000, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Rita Mushaev, as mother and natural guardian of Laura Mushaev, and Rita Mushaev individually, which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In opposition to the respondents’ motion, in which they made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, the plaintiffs failed to come forward with proof sufficient to raise an issue of fact. The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the dog which allegedly caused the injuries to the plaintiff Lau Lee Chan had ever bitten anyone or exhibited any vicious propensities, or that the respondents exercised any dominion or control over it.

We note that the affidavit of the plaintiffs’ daughter in opposition to the motion should not have been considered, since the plaintiffs did not answer the respondents’ demand for notice witnesses, and offered no excuse for their failure to do so *(see, Ortega v New York City Tr. Auth.,*262 AD2d 470). Bracken, Acting P. J., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02625

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 02625\02625_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02625\02625_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 02625\02625_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02625\02625_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02625\02625_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02625\02625_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02625\02625_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

02625\Certification Statement Plant ID 02625.pdf Plant certification statement

02625\Supporting Documentation\02625_Part A Attachment-Aerial view.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02625\Supporting Documentation\Part A Attachment-Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council, May 18, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to May 18, 2009, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/E2, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 14, 2009, 74 FR 2083.                

The full council will meet in closed session from 12:15 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. to discuss changes in the ECB. This discussion will involve confidential material. Subcommittee meetings that were to start at 1 p.m. will begin at 1:30 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: March 19, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-6596 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of Keating Capital, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Ranjit P. Mankekar, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.











/s/
      Ranjit P. MankekarName:
              Ranjit
      P. MankekarDate:
              March
      9, 2009
SERVED: DECEMBER 16, 2010 

JE[^ARTMENT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMBN'I- 01- TRANSPORTATION..r'l;j:f nDfrp^TjQMC' 

OFFICE OF HEARFNGS """^"'^ "' "" ' '"^ 

WASHINGTON. DC y^ OEC IS A S: Li5 

INTHEMAITEROF 

PATRICK EARL CARTY 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0671 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 20I0AL960004) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and oilier communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

(onnie A. Yodef/^ 

Chief Adminisirati^e^i^w Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-201 N067 

(Civil Penally Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wa.shington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Erin B. Marslon, Respondenf-'.s Counsel 

Law Ofllces of Marston & Cole, P.C. 

821 N Street, Suite 208 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-277-8001 

FAX: 907-277-8002 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Ofllce of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renlon, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodw'm, Adminislralive. Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Depatlment of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the toilowing address: Hearing 

Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014, 

Washington, DC 20591; Attention: llearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
EXHIBIT 23.4


Sproule Associates Limited


                                   April 14, 1999

Greka Energy Corporation
630 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1501
New York, NY 10111

     Re: Evaluation of the P&NG Reserves of Beaver Lake Reserves Corporation,
         as of January 1, 1999

Dear Sirs:

     Sproule Associates Limited hereby consents to being named in the annual
10-KSB report, which upon its filing will be incorporated by reference in the 
Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 33-60621.

     We confirm that we have read excerpts from the draft document and that we
have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the
information contained therein that is derived from our Report.


                                      Sincerely,


                                     /s/ R. K. MacLeod
                                     ___________________________________
                                         R. K. MacLeod, Eng.
                                         Vice-President, Engineering
                                         U.S. and International
Dallas, Texas
April 14, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Fuer International, Inc. (Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Zhang LiZhang Li

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer





Date: March 31, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fuer International, Inc. and will be retained by Fuer International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.,
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of China Dredging Group
Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of China Dredging Group Co., Ltd.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 27, 2012 | By: | /s/ Alfred Ho                 | 
|-------------------- | --- | ----------------------------- | 
|                     |     | Alfred Ho                     | 
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer       | 
|                     |     | (Principal Financial Officer) |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6473] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: “Endless Forms”: Charles Darwin, Natural Science and the Visual Arts, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, CT, from on or about February 12, 2009, until on or about May 3, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-453-8050)). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

December 30, 2008. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E9-56 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Louis Cavell, Appellant, v Salvatore Sialiano et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 869]

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered February 23, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against him dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the Supreme Court properly charged the jury that the standard of proof for establishing fraud is clear and convincing evidence *(see, Simcuski v Saeli,*44 NY2d 442; *Rudman v Cowles Communications,*30 NY2d 1). Furthermore, we perceive no reason to disturb the jury’s determination, which was based upon an assessment of the plaintiffs credibility and a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see, Tarantino v Vanguard Leasing Co.,*187 AD2d 422; *Brugellis v Batts,*129 AD2d 545).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report of Chardan Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KT for the year ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William C. Morro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o (d)); and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Chardan Acquisition Corp.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  Chardan Acquisition Corp.Date: September 15, 2010
By:
/s/ William C. MorroWilliam C. MorroChief Financial Officer