alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report") that:



|Date: August 16, 2004 |  | /s/EVAN H. ZUCKEREvan H. Zucker Chief Executive Officer        
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2004 |  | /s/JAMES R. MULVIHILLJames R. Mulvihill Chief Financial Officer

1

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7290

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSEPH RODNEY BROOKS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District 

Judge. (5:06-cr-00014-SGW-MFU; 5:07-cv-00537-SGW-MFU) 

Submitted: February 2, 2009 Decided: February 10, 2009 

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Joseph Rodney Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Burton Fitzgerald, 

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ronald Mitchell 

Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Joseph Rodney Brooks seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brooks has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Jan Marie VATER, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81223

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: February 26, 2019

Daniel J. Kennedy and Cameron H.J. Cooper, Independence, MO, and Jeffrey S. Eastman, Gladstone, MO, Attorneys for Appellant.

Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and James A. Chenault, III, and Morgan L. Brewington, Special Assistant Attorneys General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Ms. Jan M. Vater appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, upholding the Director of Revenue's suspension of Vater's driver's license under section 302.505.1 after her arrest for driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
exv10w31









    Exhibit 10.31



 




    Marlin
    Business Services Corp.

    Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Independent
    Directors



 



    Non-Employee Independent Directors of Marlin Business Services
    Corp. (the “Company”) are eligible to receive
    compensation for their time and service participating on the
    Company’s Board of Directors and Committees.



 


			
	 	    • 
	
    A one-time initial option grant of 5,000 shares will be
    made to each Non-Employee Independent Director upon such
    Director’s first-time election/appointment to the
    Company’s Board of
    Directors.1


	 
	 	    • 
	
    Each Non-Employee Independent Director will receive the
    following annual compensation for their Board and Committee
    memberships:




 


			
	 	    - 
	
    Annual
    retainer2 —

    $100,000 for Chairman of the Board and $30,000 for each other
    Non-Employee Independent Director

	 
	 	    - 
	
    Option grant yielding a present value of $10,250 for Chairman of
    the Board and $9,000 for each other Non-Employee Independent
    Director (using option pricing
    model)3


	 
	 	    - 
	
    Restricted stock grant yielding a present value of $30,750 for
    Chairman of the Board and $27,000 for each other Non-Employee
    Independent
    Director4





 


			
	 	    • 
	
    The Committee Chairmen will also be paid the following amounts
    each
    year5:





 


	 	 	 	 	 
	

    - Audit Committee Chairman


	
 
	
    $
	
    10,000
	
 

	

    - Compensation Committee Chairman


	
 
	
    $
	
    4,000
	
 

	

    - Nominating/Governance Committee Chairman


	
 
	
    $
	
    2,000
	
 











 


			
	 	    • 
	
    Non-Employee Independent Director ownership requirement:




 


			
	 	    - 
	
    Each Non-Employee Independent Director shall be required to own
    2,500 shares of Company stock (or 7,500 shares if
    serving as Chairman of the Board). Restricted shares do not
    count toward the ownership requirement.




 





 




			
	
    1		
    These options will have a seven year term and will vest pro-rata
    over four years from the grant date (one-quarter of the total
    grant per year).
	 
	
    2		
    This retainer shall be paid in quarterly installments.
	 
	
    3		
    Annual option grants will have a seven year term and will cliff
    vest one year from the grant date.
	 
	
    4		
    Restricted stock grants will vest at the earlier of
    (a) seven years from the grant gate and (b) six months
    following the Non-Employee Independent Director’s
    termination of Board service.
	 
	
    5		
    These fees shall be paid in quarterly installments
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Gary McGaha, President and C.E.O., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b. [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
16

 
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005       /s/ Gary McGaha     Gary McGaha, President and    Chief Executive Officer  
17
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 3, 2019

No. 04

- 17

- 00645

- CR

Gloria R. PROO,

Appellan t

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2757A

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee B r yan Marion, Chi ef Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Ir ene Rios, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing, a nd the motion is

D ENIED.

_________________________________ Reb eca C. Ma rt in ez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.2****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**     Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of North PointeHoldings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: November 9, 2006                 /s/ Brian J. Roney   Brian J. Roney        Chief Financial Officer
::c:~ AL 

3Tn tbe Wniteb ~tates Qeourt of jf eberal Qelaims 

No. 15- 1230C 

(Filed: January 8, 2015) 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

INEZ VELEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE UNITED STATES, 

Defendant. 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER 

FILED 

JAN - 8.2016 

U.S. COURT OF 

FEDERAL CLAIMS 

Plaintiff's complaint seeks $280 million for injuries suffered throughout 

her life as a result of alleged negligent medical care provided while she was 

in hospitals and mental care facilities both in New York and Puerto Rico. She 

also alleges that "the state" failed to protect her while in custody and that "the 

state" had covered up a sexual assault that she experienced in 19 5 3. Defendant 

moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Having apparently misapprehended 

the effect of such a motion, plaintiff subsequently sent a packet of materials, 

the aim of which is expressing plaintiff's displeasure at having had her case 

dismissed. The clerk's office did not file those documents because of a 

number of procedural defects. 

Although we are cognizant of plaintiff's pro se status and apparent 

confusion, we need not wait for a proper response to the motion to dismiss 

because Rule 13(h) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims 

compels us to dismiss the complaint sua sponte. 

28 U.S.C. § 1491 gives this courtjurisdiction to "render judgment upon 

any claim against the United States founded either upon the Constitution, or 

any Act of Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any 

express or implied contract with the United States ... in cases not sounding in 

tort." The most relevant portion of this to plaintiff's complaint is the exclusion 

'· ' 
of tort claims from our jurisdiction. Although the complaint is largely devoid 

of any factual allegations of how plaintiff was harmed, it is clear, to the extent 

that she has alleged any legally cognizable claims, they are grounded in tort, 

that is to say that her claims involve the intentional or negligent infliction of 

harm upon her by third parties. This is precisely what our jurisdictional statute 

excludes from our review. 

Accordingly, the following is ordered: 

1. Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied as moot. 

2. The clerk's office is directed to return the documents received on 

January 4, 2016, to plaintiff unfiled. 

3. The clerk is directed to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction 

and enter judgment accordingly. 

Judge
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 35 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require continued 

broadcasting of the full House Chamber during legislative business consistent with the broadcasts that occured on January 3–6, 2023. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2023 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Mr. FROST, Mr. BOWMAN, Ms. BUSH, Ms. CASTOR

of Florida, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, 

Mr. HUFFMAN, Ms. JACOBS, Ms. TOKUDA, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Ms. 

JAYAPAL, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Mr. LIEU, Ms. MENG, Mr. 

MOSKOWITZ, Mr. NADLER, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, and Mrs. DINGELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require continued broadcasting of the full House Chamber during legislative business consistent with the broadcasts that occured on January 3–6, 2023. 

1 Resolved, That clause 2(a) of rule V of the Rules of 

2 the House of Represenatives is amended by adding at the 

3 end the following: 

4 ‘‘The recording and broadcasting performed pursuant 

5 to this clause shall ensure the possible coverage of floor 

6 proceedings that are least as transparent as the broadVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:44 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR35.IH HR35

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 35 IH 

1 casts that occured on January 3–6, 2023, at the beginning 

2 of the 118th Congress.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Crossroads Liquidating Trust 10-K



Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Trustee

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) of Crossroads Liquidating Trust,
the undersigned Trustees of Crossroads Liquidating Trust, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Crossroads
Liquidating Trust.



|March 28, 2018 |  | /s/ Andrew Dakos                 
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Date           |  | Andrew Dakos
Trustee             
|               |  |                                  
|March 28, 2018 |  | /s/ Phillip Goldstein            
|Date           |  | Phillip Goldstein
        Trustee
|March 28, 2018 |  | /s/ Gerald Hellerman             
|Date           |  | Gerald Hellerman
        Trustee
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12384-12385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,485]


Sapa HE Tubing, Louisville, KY; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 4,

[[Page 12385]]

2009 in response to a petition filed by the United Steelworkers of 
America, Local 155, on behalf of workers of Sapa HE Tubing, Louisville, 
Kentucky.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6315 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: The City of Houston v. Dolcefino Communications, LLC d/b/a Dolcefino Consulting; and Wayne Dolcefino, in His Individual Capacity

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 0 0 491

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 7

- 50825

Trial court: 1 1 th District Court

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to have the clerk’s record from a prior proceeding filed in this Court

, transferred to this appeal from an order granting a partial motion for summary judgment. A court of appeals has the power to take judicial notice of its own files in the same or related proceedings. See In re Chaumette , 456 S.W.3d 299, 303 n.2 (Tex. App

. — Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, orig. proceeding). We grant the motion. Accordingly, we ORDER the Clerk of this Court to transfer the clerk’s record in appellate cause number 01

- 17

- 00979

- CV to this case and to label the transferred clerk’s record as Volume 1 A

.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Sherry Radack

_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ August 8, 2019

___
OCTAGON 88 RESOURCES, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Guido Hilekes, Chief Executive Officer and President of Octagon 88 Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), and Richard Ebner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2014 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report.





DATE: October 14, 2014
By:
/s/ Guido HilekesName:
Guido HilekesTitle:
Chief Executive Officer & President(Principal Executive Officer)




DATE: October 14, 2014
By:
/s/ Richard EbnerName:
Richard EbnerTitle:
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Leslye Grindle, C.F.O., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
19

 
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 14, 2007           /s/ Leslye Grindle   Leslye Grindle, Sr. Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer  
20
April 29, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIE EUGENE PEARSON, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00277-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.