Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 203 / Wednesday, October 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 63683 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: September 29, 2015. 

Jack E. Housenger, 

Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. Add section 180.1333 to subpart D 

to read as follows: 

§ 180.1333 Potassium Salts of Hops Beta 

acids; exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance. 

An exemption from the requirement 

of a tolerance is established for residues 

of the biochemical potassium salts of 

hops beta acids in or on honey and 

honeycomb, when used for the control 

of Varroa mites in accordance with label 

directions and good agricultural 

practices. 

[FR Doc. 2015–26600 Filed 10–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0442; FRL–9935–34] 

Poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], α- 

[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)- 

1-oxo-9-octadecen-1yl]oxy]-; 

Exemption From the Requirement of a 

Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of 

poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], a- 

[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1- 

oxo-9-octadecen-1yl]oxy]- (CAS Reg. 

No. 26571–49–3) when used as an inert 

ingredient in a pesticide chemical 

formulation. BYK USA Inc., submitted a 

petition to EPA under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 

requesting an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance. This 

regulation eliminates the need to 

establish a maximum permissible level 

for residues of poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1yl]oxy]- on food or feed commodities. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

October 21, 2015. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before December 21, 2015, and 

must be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0442, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Printing 

Office’s e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.

gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/

ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. 

C. Can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2015–0442 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before December 21, 2015. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2015–0442, by one of the following 

methods. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://www.

epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Background and Statutory Findings 

In the Federal Register of August 26, 

2015 (80 FR 51759) (FRL–9931–74), 

EPA issued a document pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, 

announcing the receipt of a pesticide 

petition (PP) IN–10826 filed by BYK 

USA Inc., 524 South Cherry Street, 

Wallingford, CT 06492–4453. The 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
63684 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 203 / Wednesday, October 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

petition requested that 40 CFR 180.960 

be amended by establishing an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of 

poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], a- 

[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1- 

oxo-9-octadecen-1yl]oxy]- (CAS Reg. 

No. 26571–49–3). That document 

included a summary of the petition 

prepared by the petitioner and solicited 

comments on the petitioner’s request. 

There were no comments received in 

response to the notice of filing. Section 

408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to 

establish an exemption from the 

requirement for a tolerance (the legal 

limit for a pesticide chemical residue in 

or on a food) only if EPA determines 

that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 

408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ 

to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable 

certainty that no harm will result from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue, including all 

anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and 

use in residential settings, but does not 

include occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue . . .’’ and specifies 

factors EPA is to consider in 

establishing an exemption. 

III. Risk Assessment and Statutory 

Findings 

EPA establishes exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance only in those 

cases where it can be shown that the 

risks from aggregate exposure to 

pesticide chemical residues under 

reasonably foreseeable circumstances 

will pose no appreciable risks to human 

health. In order to determine the risks 

from aggregate exposure to pesticide 

inert ingredients, the Agency considers 

the toxicity of the inert in conjunction 

with possible exposure to residues of 

the inert ingredient through food, 

drinking water, and through other 

exposures that occur as a result of 

pesticide use in residential settings. If 

EPA is able to determine that a finite 

tolerance is not necessary to ensure that 

there is a reasonable certainty that no 

harm will result from aggregate 

exposure to the inert ingredient, an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance may be established. 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the 

available scientific data and other 

relevant information in support of this 

action and considered its validity, 

completeness and reliability and the 

relationship of this information to 

human risk. EPA has also considered 

available information concerning the 

variability of the sensitivities of major 

identifiable subgroups of consumers, 

including infants and children. In the 

case of certain chemical substances that 

are defined as polymers, the Agency has 

established a set of criteria to identify 

categories of polymers expected to 

present minimal or no risk. The 

definition of a polymer is given in 40 

CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion 

criteria for identifying these low-risk 

polymers are described in 40 CFR 

723.250(d). Poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1yl]oxy]- conforms to the definition of a 

polymer given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and 

meets the following criteria that are 

used to identify low-risk polymers. 

1. The polymer is not a cationic 

polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated 

to become a cationic polymer in a 

natural aquatic environment. 

2. The polymer does contain as an 

integral part of its composition the 

atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and 

oxygen. 

3. The polymer does not contain as an 

integral part of its composition, except 

as impurities, any element other than 

those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii). 

4. The polymer is neither designed 

nor can it be reasonably anticipated to 

substantially degrade, decompose, or 

depolymerize. 

5. The polymer is manufactured or 

imported from monomers and/or 

reactants that are already included on 

the TSCA Chemical Substance 

Inventory or manufactured under an 

applicable TSCA section 5 exemption. 

6. The polymer is not a water 

absorbing polymer with a number 

average molecular weight (MW) greater 

than or equal to 10,000 daltons. 

Additionally, the polymer also meets 

as required the following exemption 

criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e). 

7. The polymer’s minimum number 

average MW of 2,300 is greater than 

1,000 and less than 10,000 daltons. The 

polymer contains less than 10% 

oligomeric material below MW 500 and 

less than 25% oligomeric material 

below MW 1,000, and the polymer does 

not contain any reactive functional 

groups. 

Thus, poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1yl]oxy]- meets the criteria for a 

polymer to be considered low risk under 

40 CFR 723.250. Based on its 

conformance to the criteria in this unit, 

no mammalian toxicity is anticipated 

from dietary, inhalation, or dermal 

exposure to poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1yl]oxy]-. 

IV. Aggregate Exposures 

For the purposes of assessing 

potential exposure under this 

exemption, EPA considered that 

poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], a- 

[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1- 

oxo-9-octadecen-1yl]oxy]- could be 

present in all raw and processed 

agricultural commodities and drinking 

water, and that non-occupational nondietary exposure was possible. The 

minimum number average MW of 

poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], a- 

[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1- 

oxo-9-octadecen-1yl]oxy]- is 2,300 

daltons. Generally, a polymer of this 

size would be poorly absorbed through 

the intact gastrointestinal tract or 

through intact human skin. Since 

poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], a- 

[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1- 

oxo-9-octadecen-1yl]oxy]- conform to 

the criteria that identify a low-risk 

polymer, there are no concerns for risks 

associated with any potential exposure 

scenarios that are reasonably 

foreseeable. The Agency has determined 

that a tolerance is not necessary to 

protect the public health. 

V. Cumulative Effects From Substances 

With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity 

Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA 

requires that, when considering whether 

to establish, modify, or revoke a 

tolerance, the Agency consider 

‘‘available information’’ concerning the 

cumulative effects of a particular 

pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other 

substances that have a common 

mechanism of toxicity.’’ 

EPA has not found poly[oxy(methyl1,2-ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9- 

octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9- 

octadecen-1yl]oxy]- to share a common 

mechanism of toxicity with any other 

substances, and poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1yl]oxy]- does not appear to produce a 

toxic metabolite produced by other 

substances. For the purposes of this 

tolerance action, therefore, EPA has 

assumed that poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1yl]oxy]- does not have a common 

mechanism of toxicity with other 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 203 / Wednesday, October 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 63685 

substances. For information regarding 

EPA’s efforts to determine which 

chemicals have a common mechanism 

of toxicity and to evaluate the 

cumulative effects of such chemicals, 

see EPA’s Web site at http://www.epa.

gov/pesticides/cumulative. 

VI. Additional Safety Factor for the 

Protection of Infants and Children 

Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA 

provides that EPA shall apply an 

additional tenfold margin of safety for 

infants and children in the case of 

threshold effects to account for prenatal 

and postnatal toxicity and the 

completeness of the data base unless 

EPA concludes that a different margin of 

safety will be safe for infants and 

children. Due to the expected low 

toxicity of poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1yl]oxy]-, EPA has not used a safety 

factor analysis to assess the risk. For the 

same reasons the additional tenfold 

safety factor is unnecessary. 

VII. Determination of Safety 

Based on the conformance to the 

criteria used to identify a low-risk 

polymer, EPA concludes that there is a 

reasonable certainty of no harm to the 

U.S. population, including infants and 

children, from aggregate exposure to 

residues of poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen1yl]oxy]-. 

VIII. Other Considerations 

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

An analytical method is not required 

for enforcement purposes since the 

Agency is establishing an exemption 

from the requirement of a tolerance 

without any numerical limitation. 

B. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

The Codex Alimentarius is a joint 

United Nations Food and Agriculture 

Organization/World Health 

Organization food standards program, 

and it is recognized as an international 

food safety standards-setting 

organization in trade agreements to 

which the United States is a party. EPA 

may establish a tolerance that is 

different from a Codex MRL; however, 

FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that 

EPA explain the reasons for departing 

from the Codex level. 

The Codex has not established a MRL 

for poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], a- 

[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1- 

oxo-9-octadecen-1yl]oxy]-. 

IX. Conclusion 

Accordingly, EPA finds that 

exempting residues of poly[oxy(methyl1,2-ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9- 

octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9- 

octadecen-1yl]oxy]- from the 

requirement of a tolerance will be safe. 

X. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action establishes a tolerance 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this action 

has been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this action is 

not subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This action does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This action directly regulates growers, 

food processors, food handlers, and food 

retailers, not States or tribes, nor does 

this action alter the relationships or 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established by Congress 

in the preemption provisions of FFDCA 

section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency 

has determined that this action will not 

have a substantial direct effect on States 

or tribal governments, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined 

that Executive Order 13132, entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999) and Executive Order 13175, 

entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply 

to this action. In addition, this action 

does not impose any enforceable duty or 

contain any unfunded mandate as 

described under Title II of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 

1501 et seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

XI. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: October 13, 2015. 

Susan Lewis, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.960, add alphabetically the 

following polymer to the table to read as 

follows: 

§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance. 

* * * * * 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
63686 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 203 / Wednesday, October 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

Polymer CAS No. 

* * * * * 

Poly[oxy(methyl-1,2- 

ethanediyl)], a-[(9Z)-1-oxo-9- 

octadecen-1-yl]-w-[[(9Z)-1- 

oxo-9-octadecen-1yl]oxy]-, 

minimum number average 

molecular weight (in amu) 

2,300 ..................................... 26571–49–3 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–26617 Filed 10–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0012; FRL–9935–11] 

Pyrimethanil; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of pyrimethanil 

in or on multiple commodities which 

are identified and discussed later in this 

document. Interregional Research 

Project Number 4 (IR–4) requested the 

tolerances associated with pesticide 

petition number (PP 4E8302), and Bayer 

CropScience requested the tolerances 

associated with PP 4F8291, under the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 

(FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

October 21, 2015, except for the 

amendment to § 180.661 in amendatory 

instruction number 3, which is effective 

April 21, 2016. Objections and requests 

for hearings must be received on or 

before December 21, 2015, and must be 

filed in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0012, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2015–0012 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before December 21, 2015. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2015–0012, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://www.

epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Summary of Petitioned-For 

Tolerance 

In the Federal Register of December 

17, 2014 (79 FR 75107) (FRL–9918–90), 

EPA issued a document pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 

346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of (PP 

4E8302) by IR–4, 500 College Road East, 

Suite 201 W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The 

petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 

be amended by establishing tolerances 

for residues of the fungicide 

pyrimethanil, (4,6-dimethyl-N-phenyl-2- 

pyrimidinamine), in or on cucumber at 

1.5 parts per million (ppm); fruit, pome, 

group 11–10 at 14 ppm; fruit, stone, 

group 12–12 at 10 ppm; grapefruit 

subgroup 10–10C at 10 ppm; lemon 

subgroup 10–10B at 11 ppm; orange 

subgroup 10–10A at 10 ppm; and 

tomato subgroup 8–10A at 0.5 ppm. 

Upon approval of the tolerances in this 

petition, the petition requested that the 

tolerances for fruit, citrus, group 10 

except lemon, postharvest; fruit, pome, 

group 11 (preharvest and post-harvest); 

fruit, stone, group 12; lemon (preharvest 

and postharvest); and tomato be 

removed as they are superseded. This 

petition additionally requested that 40 

CFR 180.518 be amended by revising 

the existing tolerance for onion, bulb, 

subgroup 3–07A from 2.0 ppm to 0.20 

ppm. That document referenced a 

summary of the petition prepared on 

behalf of IR–4 by Bayer CropScience, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES