alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

# SUMMARY:

Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in Washington, DC.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 7 and 8, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on April 7 and 8, 2009, in Room 4136 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Carolan, C:AP:ART, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 435-5609 (not a toll free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on April 7 and 8, 2009, in Room 4136 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.

A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned with matters listed in 5 U.S.C. section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), and that the meeting will not be open to the public.

Sarah Hall Ingram,

Chief, Appeals.

 [FR Doc. E9-5941 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 11,      2008                                      |   | By:  /s/ Guy W.      Harris                                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   | Guy      W. Harris                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

----
|**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                                           
|**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**                    

In connection with the Quarterly Report of M.C.F.T.Y. National (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof or immediately
thereafter (the "Report"), I, Lori J. Kwoka, President and Chief Executive Officer,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company

|/s/ LORI J. KWOKA                                
|-------------------------------------------------
|Lori J. Kwoka, President, Chief Executive Officer
|November 23, 2003                                

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
to be filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

|
|
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofUni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James A. Tassone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·              The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | August 12, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ James A. Tassone                       |
|--------|----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                 |   |   | James A. Tassone, Chief  Financial Officer |

 

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and will be retained by Uni-Pixel, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not bedeemed  filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification**
I, Gary McGaha, President and C.E.O., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Southern CommunityBancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 17, 2004       /s/ Gary McGaha
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) of Keating Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen M. Hills, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











/s/ Stephen M. HillsName:
Stephen M. HillsDate:
March 1, 2012
Exhibit 32.2

Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of the iShares® Diversified Alternatives Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Geoffrey D. Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of iShares® Delaware
Trust Sponsor LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2010         
|                             
|/s/ Geoffrey D. Flynn        
|Geoffrey D. Flynn*           
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Flynn is signing in his capacity as an officer of iShares® Delaware Trust Sponsor LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Cosi, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, of
the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/ Kevin Armstrong
-----------------------
Kevin Armstrong
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003


                                    Page 31
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________
No. 97-10853 Summary Calendar

_______________________

LLOYD EDWIN HUMPHREYS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUREAU OF PRISONS; PATRICIA SHINGLES, Community Corrections Manager; DONCELLA MILTON, Director of Community Corrections Ctr.,

Respondents-Appellees.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-160-T

______________________________________________

March 27, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *1 See Ojo v. I.N.S. , 106 F.3d 680 (5th Cir. 1997).

2 Sinclair v. State , 679 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1982).

2 Lloyd Edwin Humphreys appeals t he dismissal of his petition and motion

challenging the calculation of his release date from federal custody under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241, collaterally challenging his conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and seeking

issuance of a writ of error coram nobis

. Humphreys was convicted in a trial before the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Iowa. The court à quo l acked jurisdiction over the §

2255 claims. 1 Similarly, a writ of error corum nobis “can only issue to aid the

jurisdiction of the court in which the conviction was had.” 2 Accordingly, the trial

court did not err in dismissing these claims.

Humph reys contends that the district court improperly determined that his

§ 2241 petition was moot. He was sentenced to a three-year term of probation

commencing on the date of his release from confinement. He was so released on

February 4, 1994. Obviously more than three years have passed since that date and

Humphreys no longer suffers from any collateral consequences resulting from the

calculation of his release date. Therefore there is no case or controversy before the

court. The § 2241 petition is moot and there was no error in its dismissal.3 Ellis v. Lynaugh , 873 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1989) (§ 2254 case).

3 Hump hreys contends that the district court erred in dismissing his action

without holding a hearing. An evidentiary hearing is not required when the record

is complete or in those instances i n which the petitioner raises only legal claims

that can be resolved without the presentation of additional evidence. 3 There is no

dispute regarding Humphreys’s actual release date or the length of his term of

probation. Only legal issues are presented. Because Humphreys’s § 2241 petition

was moot and the district court lacked jurisdiction over the § 2255 and coram nobis

claims, no hearing was required.

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Silvestre, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 248]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J., at hearing; William Leibovitz, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered January 27, 1999, convicting defendant of robbery in the second *365degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree (eight counts), and sentencing him to a term of 4 to 8 years and eight terms of lVs to 4 years, all the terms to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. There was ample evidence of physical injury, including the victim’s testimony that she suffered a sprained ankle as well as abrasions and bruises to her hands, elbow and leg, that her pain lasted one week and that she missed three days of work *(see, People v Montalvo,*269 AD2d 328, *lv denied*95 NY2d 800).

On the existing record, we find that trial counsel provided meaningful representation *(see, People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714). Counsel’s elicitation of a photographic identification and related evidence was clearly part of a legitimate strategy aimed at establishing that the victim’s identification of defendant was unreliable.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see, People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,798]


Maverick Tube LLC, dba Tenaris Hickman, Blytheville, AR; Notice 
of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on December 31, 2008, in response to a 
worker petition filed by the State of Arkansas on behalf of workers at 
Maverick Tube LLC, dba TenarisHickman, Blytheville, Arkansas.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6291 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Gary McGaha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Gary McGahaGary McGaha, President and Chief Executive Officer
 May 7, 2004 18
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2276

In re: COREY THOMAS JONES,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(1:11-cr-00530-CMH-2; 1:14-cv-01493-CMH)

Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Thomas Jones, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Corey Thomas Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district 

court has failed to rule on a number of motions and memoranda filed in his prior 

postconviction proceedings. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court 

to act. The underlying record demonstrates, however, that final orders have been entered 

in these postconviction proceedings, and the cited motions are no longer pending. Jones 

is therefore not entitled to mandamus relief. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED