alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                 PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350

     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of Allstate Life
Insurance Company of New York filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York.


Date:  March 24, 2004

                                     /s/  Casey J. Sylla
                                     -------------------
                                     Casey J. Sylla
                                     Chairman of the Board and President


                                     /s/  Steven E. Shebik
                                     ---------------------
                                     Steven E. Shebik
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 305 

Expressing support for the designation of April 18, 2024, as ‘‘National 

Amateur Radio Operators Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2023 

Mrs. LESKO (for herself, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. 

KELLY of Pennsylvania, Ms. BROWNLEY, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Ms. 

TENNEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 18, 2024, 

as ‘‘National Amateur Radio Operators Day’’. 

Whereas amateur radio, or ‘‘ham radio’’, is an important 

pursuit that brings people together, regardless of profession, sex, or race; 

Whereas amateur radio is the oldest form of wireless digital 

communications; 

Whereas amateur radio has played an invaluable role in developing new forms of electronic communications; 

Whereas amateur radio offers individuals a chance to learn 

new technological skills; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 305 IH 

Whereas groups, such as Youngsters On the Air (YOTA), are 

working to ensure that there is a next generation of amateur radio operators; 

Whereas amateur radio groups and amateur radio clubs 

across the Nation provide communities an important way 

to communicate with one another; 

Whereas the amateur radio operator’s code contains as a 

major principle ideals that are important to country and 

community; 

Whereas a key purpose of amateur radio is to have a group 

of skilled volunteers to assist emergency responders in 

the event of a disaster; 

Whereas members of the amateur radio community, such as 

the Amateur Radio Emergency Service (ARES), have 

provided invaluable emergency communications services 

following recent natural disasters, including by helping 

coordinate disaster relief efforts following Hurricanes 

Katrina, Wilma, and Maria and other extreme weather 

disasters; 

Whereas, on April 18, 1925, the first International Amateur 

Radio Union was formed in Paris; and 

Whereas April 18, 2024, would be an appropriate day for the 

celebration of ‘‘National Amateur Radio Operators Day’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Ama3 teur Radio Operators Day’’ and its celebration 

4 around the United States; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 305 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the continuing importance of 

2 amateur radio operators and their role in bringing 

3 communities together in times of need. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 8, 2017.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00467-CR

RISPAH CHOMBAH, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 9 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2151521 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to trespass. In accordance with the terms of 

a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to six 

days’ confinement in county jail. We dismiss the appeal. 

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in 

which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no 

right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is 

included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports 
2

the certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0 573 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. VALERIE SUE DOGTAKINGGUN GRANT,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 2 3 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 13 2023

02/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0573
exv10w32






Exhibit 10.32




Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements



     In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report,
EnPro Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has the following compensation arrangements with its
directors and named executive officers.



Compensation Arrangements for Directors




     The Company has an arrangement to pay non-employee members of the Company’s board of directors
compensation for their service on the board. Effective for 2010, each non-employee member of the
Company’s board of directors receives an annual retainer of $150,000, $75,000 of which is paid in
cash and $75,000 of which is paid in phantom shares of our common stock upon the director’s
termination of service as a director. The non-executive chairman of the board receives an
additional monthly fee of $15,000, the chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committee receives
an additional annual fee of $8,000, and the chairmen of the Compensation and Human Resources
Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each receive an annual fee of
$6,000. Non-employee directors also receive an initial grant of $30,000, which is paid in phantom
shares of our common stock, upon initial election or appointment to the board.



Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers




     The Company’s chief executive officer and its four other most highly compensated executive
officers, along with information for Mr. Herold, who served as an executive officer in 2009 until
he became president of the Company’s Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC subsidiary, based on 2009
base salaries and bonuses (such six individuals, the “named executive officers”), are all “at-will”
employees who serve at the pleasure of the board of directors. The board of directors sets the
annual base salary for each of the named executive officers and has the discretion to change the
salary of any of the officers at any time. Effective for 2010, the annual base salaries for the
named executive officers are as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	Base Salary
	Stephen E. Macadam
	 	$	825,000	 
	William Dries
	 	$	350,000	 
	Richard L. Magee
	 	$	313,000	 
	J. Milton Childress II
	 	$	250,000	 
	Robert P. McKinney
	 	$	212,000	 
	Dale A. Herold
	 	$	270,000
**Haldor Topsoe Budgetary Proposal**

**Hartenstein RFP**

**(CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT)**
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned officer of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: November 10, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |
**Exhibit32.2**

Certification ofCFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*Icertify that this periodic report containing the issuer’s financial statementsfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that informationcontained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.*
|        | * * | * *        | *By:*                                                                           | */s/ John F. Coger* | * * |
|--------|----------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|----------|
|   |     |            |                                                                            |                |
|   |     |            |                                                                            |                |
|   |     |            | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Chief  Operating Officer |
|   |     |            |                                                                            |                |
|   |     |            |                                                                            |                |
|   | Date:    | August 11, 2006 |                                                                            |                |     |
|        |          |                 |                                                                                 |                     |          |  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5650 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5650

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 
        tax incentives for ethanol and biodiesel used as a fuel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2006

  Mr. Hulshof (for himself, Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Nussle, Mr. Peterson of 
   Minnesota, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Terry, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Osborne, Mr. 
Emanuel, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Moore of Kansas, and Ms. 
   Herseth) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 
        tax incentives for ethanol and biodiesel used as a fuel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renewable Fuels and Energy 
Independence Promotion Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. CREDITS FOR ALCOHOL AND BIODIESEL USED AS A FUEL MADE 
              PERMANENT.

    (a) Income Tax.--
            (1) Alcohol.--Section 40 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 (relating to alcohol used as a fuel) is amended by 
        striking subsection (e).
            (2) Biodiesel.--Section 40A of such Code (relating to 
        biodiesel and renewable diesel used as fuel) is amended by 
        striking subsection (g).
    (b) Excise Tax.--
            (1) Alcohol mixture used as a fuel.--Subsection (b) of 
        section 6426 of such Code (relating to alcohol fuel mixture 
        credit) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
            (2) Biodiesel mixture used as a fuel.--Subsection (c) of 
        section 6426 of such Code (relating to biodiesel mixture 
        credit) is amended by striking paragraph (6).
            (3) Alcohol and biodiesel mixtures not used for taxable 
        purposes.--Paragraph (5) of section 6427(e) of such Code, as 
        amended by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient 
        Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, is amended--
                    (A) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B),
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 
                subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and
                    (C) in subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by 
                striking ``subparagraph (D)'' and inserting 
                ``subparagraph (B)''.
                                 <all>
```
r--6--6f 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0691

DETENTION OFFICERS,

 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

 v. 

MISSOULA COUNTY, a political 

subdivision of the State of Montana,

 Defendants and Appellees.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Matthew B. Hayhurst, whose name appears next on the 

list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which 

is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this December 28, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Jason Sean Ritchie, Michael Manning, Robert T. Bell, Lance Patrick Jasper

12/28/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0691
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Peter A. Edison, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:   March 21, 2005
    /s/ Peter A. EdisonPeter A. EdisonChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. A signed original of this written statement or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by Bakers Footwear
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                          January 7 (legislative day, January 6), 2023.
    Resolved, That Cheryl L. Johnson of the State of Louisiana be, and is 
hereby, chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives.
    Resolved,  That Catherine Szpindor of the Commonwealth of Virginia be, and 
is hereby, chosen Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives.
    Resolved,  That Reverend Doctor Margaret Grun Kibben of the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania be, and is hereby, chosen Chaplain of the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2734

_____________________________

FERNANDO MARRERO,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

July 18, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Fernando Marrero, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel; Thomas A. Klein and Mark J. 

Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on 

Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
EXHIBIT 31.1




                             CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jianjun Zhang, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Easton Technologies
Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

       b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:  July 23, 2004


/s/ Jianjun Zhang
---------------------------------------
Jianjun Zhang, President
(principal executive officer and principal
 accounting officer)
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6345

KEVIN HERRIOTT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WAYNE MCCABE, Warden, Kershaw Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 6:19

- cv - 00803

- DCN )

Submitted : August 25, 2021 Decided: September 21, 2021

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kevin Herriott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Herriott seeks to appeal the district court’s order s acc epting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Herriott ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certif icate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that th e dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independen tly reviewed the record and conclude that Herriott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. In addition, we deny Herriott’s motions for a stay and for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED