alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION     I, James G. Petcoff, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Pointe Holdings Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Intentionally omitted.     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: May 14, 2007       /s/ James G. Petcoff     James G. Petcoff    Chief Executive Officer
[No. 50772-9-I.

Division One.

June 14, 2004.]

#### James N. Price, *Appellant,*v. James M. Beecher, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 00-2-13954-3, Mary Yu, J., entered June 21, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Kennedy and Appelwick, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY
                           EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)

I, Bruce Newman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Protocall
Technologies Incorporated.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer' s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer' s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer'
s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer' s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer' s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer' s auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer' s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

<PAGE>

May 16, 2005

/s/ Bruce Newman
-------------------------------------
Bruce Newman
President and Chief Executive Officer
CHARLESTON.

#### Board of Education of Fork Lick Dist. *v.*Rader *et al.*

Submitted January 27, 1896

Decided April 11, 1896.

Dent, Judge:

On the 7th day of May, 1894, the Board of Education of Fork Lick district, of the county of Webster, obtained a judgment in the Circuit Court of Braxton county on the general bond of H. W. Rader, late sheriff of Webster county, against him and his sureties, for the sum of two thous- and, one hundred and fifty two dollars and six cents, on account of the teachers’ fund of said district, and one thous- *183and, four hundred and four dollars and ninety two cents on account of the building fund, from which judgment a writ of error was obtained to this Court.

This case is governed in all respects by the opinion and decision of this Court in the case of Glade district against the same defendants, 42 W. Va. 178 (24 S. E. 680); and for the same reasons the judgment is reversed, the notices are quashed, and the case is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice 
Improvement Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, May 21, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Issue Committee will be held Thursday, May 21, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern 
Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 
1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7975, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine 
Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the 
Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

     Dated: March 17, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins
Acting Director Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-6356 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate:  January 20, 2005This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50829

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTWONE DUSHA CHAPPELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(W-97-CR-48)

October 6, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A jury convicted Defendant-Appellant Antwone Dusha Chappell of

being a felon in possession of a firearm. He appeals his

conviction and corresponding sentence, contending that the district

court erred in several of its evidentiary rulings and in its upward

departure from the Sentencing Guidelines.

We review a trial court’s evidentiary rulings for abuse of
2

discretion. If we find error, we review it under the harmless

error doctrine. See United States v. Skipper, 74 F.3d 608, 612

(5th Cir. 1996). We “must affirm evidentiary rulings unless they

affect a substantial right of the complaining party.” Id. We view

any errors found “not in isolation, but in relation to the entire

proceeding.” Id. After a careful review of the record and the

controlling authorities, we are convinced that none of the

evidentiary rulings challenged by Chappell rise to the level of

reversible error. As such, his conviction must be affirmed.

Chappell also appeals his sentence, contending that the

district court erred in relying on unreliable evidence in the

presentence investigation report when departing upward. Chappell’s

contention is without merit. We will affirm an upward departure

when the sentencing court articulates acceptable reasons for

departing and the extent of the departure is reasonable. Under §

4A1.3 of the Guidelines, an upward departure is proper if the

defendant’s criminal history is seriously under-represented by his

Criminal History Category or if he is likely to commit crimes in

the future. Here, the testimony regarding unprosecuted criminal

incidents in Chappell’s past was corroborated by reliable evidence.

See United States v. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929, 943 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 513 U.S. 864 (1994). As such, his sentence, too,

must be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
Order entered April 23, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00158-CR

FERNANDO MUNOZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-00579-M

ORDER

We GRANT Official Court Reporter Belinda G. Baraka’s April 20, 2015 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due THIRTY 

DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.25



 Exhibit 10.25 
 Approval to Change the date of Repayment of Loan Contract No. 0023, Year 2009 
 Based on the Loan contract signed between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited and Beijing Dehaier Technology Company Limited dated on May 5 2009, the principal of the loan is RMB
10,000,000, with repayments due on November 20, 2009, March 20, 2010 and May 20, 2010 for RMB2,000,000, RMB3,000,000 and RMB5,000,000, respectively. 
 And Beijing Dehaier Technology Company Limited negotiated with the ICBC on November 10, 2009 for modification of the repayment date, and the both party reached the mutual agreement. The revised
repayment schedule is on January 20, 2010, March 20, 2010 and May 20, 2010 for RMB1,000,000, RMB4,000,000 and RMB5,000,000, respectively. 
  
 Beijing Dehaier Technology Company Limited 
 Representative: Chen Ping 
 November 17 2009 
  
 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (Hai Dian Branch) 
 Representative: Xu Tian Ling 
 November 17 2009
Exhibit 10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 
 Execution Copy 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO SEARCH SERVICES
AGREEMENT 
 This Second Amendment to Search Services Agreement (“Second Amendment”) is entered into by and
between AOL Inc. (successor-in-interest to AOL LLC), a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business at 770 Broadway, New York, NY 10003 (“AOL”), and Time Inc. (“TI”), a Delaware corporation with
offices at 1271 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020, effective as of December 17, 2009 (the “Second Amendment Effective Date”). 
 INTRODUCTION 
 The Parties hereto wish to amend the Search Services
Agreement entered into by and between the AOL and TI on August 23, 2007, as amended by the First Amendment dated as of March 10, 2009 (collectively, the “Existing Agreement”). Together, the Existing Agreement and this
Second Amendment shall be referred to collectively as the “Agreement”. Capitalized terms not defined in this Second Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Existing Agreement. 
 AGREEMENT 
 For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby amend the Existing Agreement as follows: 
  

	1.	Term. Section 6.1 (titled, “Term”) of the Existing Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 “This Agreement will commence on the Effective Date and shall expire at 11:59 p.m. (EST) on
January 31, 2010, unless terminated earlier as provided for in this Agreement (the “Term”). TI may terminate this Agreement upon no less than three (3) days prior written notice to AOL if Google is prepared to provide
search services directly to TI.” 
  

	2.	Order of Precedence; Entire Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this Second Amendment, all terms and conditions, and provisions of the Existing
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. In the event of conflict between the terms and conditions of the Existing Agreement and the terms and conditions of this Second Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Second Amendment will
control. The Existing Agreement, together with any exhibits, and schedules attached thereto and referenced therein, all as modified by this Second Amendment, constitutes the entire and exclusive agreement between the Parties with respect to the
subject matter thereof. 

  

	3.	Counterparts; Facsimile. This Second Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall
constitute one and the same document. This Second Amendment may be executed by signatures transmitted by facsimile. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Second Amendment to Search Services Agreement to be signed by their duly authorized representatives and delivered as of the dates set forth below. 
  

									
	AOL INC.	 		 	TIME INC.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Steven Quan
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Andy Blau

					
	Name:	 	Steven Quan	 		 	Name:	 	 Andy Blau`

					
	Title:	 	VP, Business Development	 		 	Title:	 	  

					
	Date:	 	 12/17/09
	 		 	Date:	 	 12/17/09


  



					
	Confidential	 	1
```

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GenoMed, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Dr. David Moskowitz,
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Executive Officer
and President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dr. David Moskowitz
    Dr. David Moskowitz
    President/Chief Executive Officer/Chairman of the Board/Chief Financial
    Officer/Chief Accounting Officer

Dated: November 12, 2002
```
EXHIBIT
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
        1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
        2002**




In
        connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of PaperFree Medical
        Solutions, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
        ended August 31, 2007 (the “Report”)
 1.
          The
          Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section
          13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  2.
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
          the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Registrant.
 By: /s/
        Craig S. Barrow
 Date: October
        15, 2007
 Chief
        Financial Officer
  A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
          and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
          request.
. . . ..

. .. . .... **OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **GROVER SELLERS**  **ATTORnLY**

**GENERAL**

**Dear sir:** Hon. John T. Butofis#~, psge 2

**oiiloer LB**  8 pub110 **l.mceBBlt~ in**  **the &isptoh**  of aountg bus1nss8, It absll, by a sisjcirlty of ths full uwubershlpthereof,crests and estsbllsh a veterans'oounty eervlae offloe. The ocuuty ccmlsslomrs~ aourt shall appoint such reta4in8 to swh service ofPisevltb Bush asslstant. vetmans to suah **servioe** af'ilos **as** $mll be dissmd necessaryby the aounty **owmis~l~~rb~** oourt$ Sush veteran oounty servloe offloar,and/or **assistant** veteran oounty servioe offLoe3, shall reoelve a salary not to oxwed $100.00per month fop the **priwlpal** oificsrand not more than $!iO.OO, ppr month, fixed by the oounty comnls~lansr~~ aouzt, to bs paid tn equally aonthly installmentsobt of the geneml fund oi the sOu.nty, and all srlarles, travel and other **expenses** of suah o??&ae **shall** be paid **on** order Of the **oO~~I~BB~ORO~ ‘**  **~** oourt."

veteranB'county 8BJrvi0~ dlapstsh c&'oount~buslns~s a 

### cffleer under the p.rwl~laas of the county **Cad.BBlcmma ’**  cart :. ~~a-vstamxs*

oaunty wrvlco oounty **88rYlce** arfxcerunder t asxiaum fmipensetlonof the vo eanud legally exmed $100.00 peiisatlon

6f my asslstsnt ,aannot legally erpesd &5@.OO per aQlsth* ihe **above** mentickud 8th 

### spealf$.aally~ovldqs that the 'owpansatlcn af swh ofSisers **shall Im**  paid, **Out oi**  **t@** gensralfum~thesountyandLT thaommtlssianrrr~ aourthes appointedrush effloer or ohiloers,t&m bhb r yasnt acthe ,aompswatlonof'

suoh ~Wicsrs~~not to axsaad he a&ore 6e~tl#d ~amcunts, out of the aald genereX fund at th4~oat~ would be

m a ge t lHon. Joh. T. ~UtdliBOU,page b

IftheCcmmd~~loner~~ Cowt afLams~C@unty EBB not appointeda vetspans* sounty narvlos ofTlsor,and/or aSSiStBUtVeteZ'W2B ' OOUUt~ BtWVi.Ob

attiCOr,UlldW ~OU8S Bl11368,~iugra,thQnthe~aradr~l~m~ aourt oi aald sountyveuld heQS no legal authority to oontributo@.QO.OO 

### per a&h **as** 

### pert tmapensetlon 

### of a service 

### &fitter ~310 ie vorklng **under** the BBOZlBOlWhip or the Amsrlean Legion, vhsn Such cdfloers

vez'e not appointed in ooplplieme vlth the romgolng set.

It 18 Well eBtBbliBhadir0 **this** St&b &At &IO Csa~~i~Bfmem~ court **has** only suohpowrandeuthmlty ubioh
Bm T 884 given by ths BtlltU$@ and tbs COlWtitutiOnOf this S ta ar Bush power and autharity **nmassarily** LsgMad themfrasl.

APPROVED OPIRI<911CORRIW2E BY (8) WIB, cm
No. DA 20

- 0083
In the Supreme Court of the State of Montana

G REENFIELDS I RRIGATION D ISTRICT , et al.
, Defendants

- Appellants
, v.

S TATE OF M ONTANA , DNRC, et al.
, Plaintiffs

- Appellees

.

On Appeal from the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County The Honorable Michael F . McMahon, Presiding

Order Granting Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time

Pursuant to Mont. R. App. P. 26( 2 ), Appellants have moved this Court

for a 75

- day extension of time. Having reviewed the motion and the declaration

attached thereto,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court determines that Appellants
have shown that diligence and substantial need warrant the requested extension

and GRANTS Appellants’ motion. Appellants are granted a 75

- day extension
of time up to and including August 7 , 2020, to file their opening brief.
Dated this ______ day of May , 2020.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 8 2020

05/08/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0083