alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   December 9, 2008
    /s/ Charles R. Daniel, IIICharles R. Daniel, IIIVice President  Finance, Controller, Treasurer
and Secretary

Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.

(Principal Financial Officer)
John CLARK, Respondent, v. St. Louis METAL and Recycling Company, Inc., and Demetrious Hester, Appellants.

No. ED 106187

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: April 16, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Richard J. Magee, 200 South Hanley Road, Suite 500, Clayton, MO 63105.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Sean M. Flaherty, 301 Main Street, P. O. Box 800, Hillsboro, MO 63050.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

*701**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Metal and Recycling Company, Inc. and Demetrious Hester ("Appellants") appeal from a judgment denying their motion to amend the judgment entered against them and in favor of John Clark following a bench trial. Finding no obvious abuse of discretion, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 70551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28368]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA-04-2014-3750; FRL 9903-42-Region 4]

Macalloy Superfund Site, North Charleston, Charleston County, 
South Carolina; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with the 
Metallurg, Inc., Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., and Glencore LTD., 
addressing past costs and a portion of future costs concerning the 
Macalloy Superfund Site located in North Charleston, Charleston County, 
South Carolina. The settlement addresses costs from a Remedial Action 
taken by EPA at the Site.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
December 26, 2013. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from the Agency by 
contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Environmental Protection Specialist 
using the contact information provided in this notice. Comments may 
also be submitted by referencing the Site's name through one of the 
following methods:
     Internet: www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     U.S. Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund 
Division, Attn: Paula V. Painter, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303.
     Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: October 29, 2013.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-28368 Filed 11-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay
S. Potter, interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


DATE:  August 11, 2006                         /s/ Jay S. Potter
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Jay S. Potter
                                             Interim Chief Executive Officer
                                             Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc.
[No. 51771-6-I.

Division One.

June 7, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Devennice Antoine Gaines, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-04519-3, Robert H. Alsdorf, J., entered December 16, 2004. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sidney D. KOLTUN, Appellant, v. OAK VIEW VILLAGE, Respondent.

No. ED 105766

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

March 27, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 30, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018

Laurence Mass, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.

James A. Wilke, Saint Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Sidney D. Koltun ("Mr. Koltun") appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of Golden Construction Company, LLC ("Golden Construction") in a case arising out of a slip and fall Mr. Koltun took on ice while inspecting a building on the construction site of Oak View Village. The jury found no fault on the part of Golden Construction. On appeal, Mr. Koltun argues the trial court erred in failing to submit his proposed verdict directing instruction to the jury, and in failing to admit witness *667testimony at trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P . 84.16(b) (2015).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1181

MONA MOHAMMED ABDU,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-899-263)

Submitted: September 13, 2006 Decided: October 11, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Israel Gobena, GOBENA & ASSOCIATES, St. Paul, Minnesota, for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Michelle

Gorden Latour, Assistant Director, Shahira M. Tadross, OFFICE OF

IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mona Mohammed Abdu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(Board) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have

reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did

not abuse its discretion in denying Abdu’s motion. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a), (c) (2006). 

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We deny

Abdu’s motion to remand and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
----

----

| 1.  | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.       | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   | Conforce      International, Inc. |                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------|
|   |                              |                         |   |
|   | By:                               | /s/ Marino      Kulas   |   |
|   |                              | Marino      Kulas            |   |
|   |                              | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|   |                              |                         |   |
Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                         and Principal Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September
30, 2004 ("Report") of Valley Forge Scientific Corp., I, Jerry L. Malis,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Valley Forge
Scientific Corp., hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

          o    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
               or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               as amended, and

          o    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Valley Forge Scientific Corp.


Date:   December 22, 2004                    /s/ JERRY L. MALIS
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Jerry L. Malis
                                             President,
                                             Chief Executive Officer, and
                                             Principal Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of the
Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Lonestar Group Holdings Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Claude Eldridge, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 17, 2007



By: /s/ Claude EldridgeClaude Eldridge, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Lonestar Group Holdings Company
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard P. Kundrat,  Chief  Financial  Officer of NuVim,  Inc, Inc.,  certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of NuVim,  Inc. for the
period ended June 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Richard P. Kundrat
-----------------------
Richard P. Kundrat
Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Board Staff Implementation Guidance 31.1: Guidance for Implementation of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 31, Accounting for Fiduciary Activities.

# SUMMARY:

Board Action: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, section 10(a)(2), and the FASAB Rules Of Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the Federal Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) staff has issued Staff Implementation Guidance (SIG) 31.1: Guidance for Implementation of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 31, Accounting for Fiduciary Activities.

                        The SIG will be available at                         *http://www.fasab.gov/​codifica.html.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Payne, Executive Director, 441 G St., NW., Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

Authority:Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92463.

Dated: March 19, 2009.

Charles Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-6389 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
Presidential Documents

11461 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 51 

Wednesday, March 18, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2009–16 of March 11, 2009 

Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs Related To 

the Continuing Conflict In Pakistan 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the 

United States, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (the ‘‘Act’’), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important to the 

national interest to furnish assistance under the Act in an amount not 

to exceed $8 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration 

Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee 

and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative 

expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, March 11, 2009 

[FR Doc. E9–6018 

Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


tjames on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS6OB#1.EPS</GPH>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2276

In re: COREY THOMAS JONES , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 1:11

- cr
- 00530

- CMH

- 2 ; 1:14

- cv
- 01493

- CMH )

Submitted : April 19, 2018 Decided: April 23, 2018

Before GREGORY , Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Corey Thomas Jones , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Corey Thomas Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus , alleging that the district
court has failed to rul e on a number of motions and memoranda filed in his prior postconviction proceedings

. He seeks an order from this court directing the distr ict court

to act. The underlying record demonstrates, however, that final orders have been entered in these postconviction proceedings, and the cited motions are no longer pending. Jones
is therefore n ot entitled to mandamus relief. Although we grant le ave to proceed in forma pauperis , we deny the mandamus petition as moot . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Adrienne M. Lefkowitz, Appellant, v Joseph Markovits, Inc. et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 585]

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered December 15, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court dated November 3, 1999, granting the motion of the defendant Bank of New York to dismiss the complaint, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the action against the defendants Joseph Markovits, Inc., and Floral *457Masquerade, Inc. (hereinafter the defendant companies) and the defendant Bank of New York, which is in privity with the defendant companies, is barred by the doctrine of res judicata *(see, Ryan v New York Tel. Co.,*62 NY2d 494). The action seeks the same relief sought in a prior proceeding between the same parties in Surrogate’s Court, which, after a hearing, determined that the plaintiffs allegations against the defendant companies were without merit and ultimately issued a decree disallowing the plaintiffs claims against them *(see, Watts v Swiss Bank Corp.,*27 NY2d 270; *Bay Shore Family Partners v Foundation of Jewish Philanthropies,*270 AD2d 374; *Matter of Clamp,*193 AD2d 601).

The parties’ remaining contentions are either academic in light of our determination or without merit. Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.