alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 29, 2020

b0420

Order 

Clerk

April 29, 2020

159358(44)

JAMES LOCKARD and MARY LOCKARD,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 159358

COA: 341808

Macomb CC: 2016-002216-NO

MAYCO INTERNATIONAL, LLC and

ALPHA TO OMEGA PROPERTIES, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees,

and 

TEE DEE ENTERPRISES, LLC,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 23, 

2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing
General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))] for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying
officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date: | May 22, 2006
|----- | ------------



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
|                                         |                                                   |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580 |                                              | FAX (713) 651-0849 |
|                                    |      1100 LOUISIANASUITE 3800 | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5235 | TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191 |

| 1015  4TH  STREET, S.W. SUITE 600 | CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4    | TEL (403) 262-2799 | FAX (403) 262-2790 |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------|--------------------|
| 621  17TH STREET, SUITE 1550                | DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 | TEL (303) 623-9147 | FAX (303) 623-4258 |

----
---

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS In connection with the Annual Report of Nexaira Wireless Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Sampson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report. By:
        /s/ MARK SAMPSON
  Mark SampsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer Date:
        January 28, 2011


---
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  and use of our  report,  dated
January 9, 2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Redwood Empire
Bancorp for the year ended  December 31, 2002,  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-49372  on Form S-8 and  Registration  Statement  No.  33-61750 on Form S-3 of
Redwood Empire Bancorp.


                                    Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
South Bend, Indiana
March 25, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 54 (Monday, March 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, including consideration of 
personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of 
individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
    Date: June 7-9, 2009.
    Time: June 7, 2009, 7 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.

    Time: June 8, 2009, 8 a.m.to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 30, Room 117, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.

    Time: June 9, 2009, 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 30, Room 117, 
Rockville, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Alicia J. Dombroski, PhD, Director, Division of 
Extramural Activities, Natl Inst of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/about/Council Committees.asp where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 17, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-6201 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 99      Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States
          Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section  906
          Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quality Exchange, Inc.
("Quality  Exchange") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  June
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the  date  hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew D. Owens,  President,
Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Principal  Financial  Officer  of
Quality  Exchange, certify, pursuant to Title 18,  United  States
Code,  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Quality Exchange

Date: August 10, 2003

/s/ Andrew D. Owens
------------------------
Andrew D. Owens
President and Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carroll ShelbyInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the periodending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carroll Shelby, Director ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 15, 2004 |   | /s/ CARROLL SHELBY  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Carroll Shelby, Director |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primus Guaranty, Ltd., a Bermuda company (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas W. Jasper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Richard Claiden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
        to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 12, 2008/s/ Thomas W. JasperThomas W. JasperChief Executive Officer


/s/ Richard ClaidenRichard ClaidenChief Financial Officer






---
Kevin HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81208

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: APRIL 2, 2019

Gwenda Renee' Robinson, Saint Louis, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Kevin Hicks appeals the circuit court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**FORM 10-QSB**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

# **Quarterended March 31, 2006**

# ** **

I, James B. Druck,Chief Executive Officer of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”)certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

 

(2)           Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 15,  2006 |                     |
|---------------------------|--------------------------|
|                      |                     |
|                      | /s/ James B. Druck       |
|                      | James B. Druck           |
|                      | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 11


<PAGE>



Exhibit No. 11  Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            At December 31,
                                                                                  ----------------------------------------
                                                                                     1996         1995            1994
                                                                                     ----         ----            ----

<S>                                                                               <C>          <C>             <C>       
Net income ....................................................................   $3,025,821   $4,343,404      $4,455,455
Weighted average common shares outstanding ....................................    2,470,361    2,504,322       2,575,938
Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect of stock options...............       54,129       60,844          74,696
Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding...............    2,524,490    2,565,166       2,650,634
Primary earnings per share ....................................................   $     1.20   $     1.69      $     1.68

Total weighted average common shares and equivalents  outstanding..............    2,524,490    2,565,166       2,650,634
Additional dilutive shares using the higher of the end of period
  market value or average market value for the period when utilizing 
  the treasury stock method regarding stock options ...........................        2,779        4,578             250
Total outstanding shares for fully diluted earnings per share computation......    2,527,269    2,569,774       2,650,884
Fully diluted earnings per share ..............................................   $     1.20   $     1.69      $     1.68

</TABLE>
# ::c:~ 

# AL 3Tn tbe Wniteb**~tates** 

# Qeourt ofjf 

# eberal Qelaims No. 15- 1230C (Filed: January 8, 2015) 

### * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * INEZ VELEZ, 

### Plaintiff,

v. THE UNITED STATES, 

### Defendant. 

### * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER 

# FILED JAN - 8.2016 U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Plaintiff's complaint seeks $280 million for injuries sufferedthroughout her life as a result of alleged negligent medical care provided while she was in hospitals and mental care facilities both in New York and Puerto Rico. She also alleges that "the state" failed to protect her while in custody and that "the state" had coveredup a sexual assaultthat she experienced in 1953. Defendant moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Having apparently misapprehended the effect of such a motion, plaintiff subsequently sent a packet ofmaterials, the aim ofwhich is expressing plaintiff's displeasure at having had her case dismissed. The clerk's office did not file those documents because of a number ofprocedural defects. Although we are cognizant of plaintiff's 

### pro se status and apparent confusion, we need not wait for a proper response to the motion to dismiss because Rule 13(h) ofthe Rules ofthe United States Court ofFederal Claims compels us to dismiss the complaint 

### sua sponte. 28 U.S.C. § 1491 gives this courtjurisdictionto "render judgmentupon any claim against the United States founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act ofCongress or any regulation ofan executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States

... in cases not sounding in tort." The mostrelevantportion ofthis to plaintiff's complaintis the exclusion

'· 'oftort claims from ourjurisdiction. Although the complaint is largely devoid ofany factual allegations ofhow plaintiffwas harmed, it is clear, to the extent that she has alleged any legally cognizable claims, they are grounded in tort, that is to say that her claims involve the intentional or negligent infliction of harm upon her by thirdparties. This is preciselywhat ourjurisdictional statute excludes from our review. Accordingly, the following is ordered: 1. Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied as moot. 2. The clerk's office is directed to return the documents received on January 4, 2016, to plaintiffunfiled. 3. The clerk is directedto dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and enterjudgment accordingly.

Judge
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-79,972-01

EX P ARTE RICARDO ROM ERO, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 52,802-C IN THE 89th DIST RICT COURT

F ROM WICHITA COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of kidnapping and sentenc ed to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary beca use he pled g uilty under the err oneous belief tha t he would be e ligible to attend boot c amp. Ba sed on the re cord in this case , the trial court finds, and the State ag ree s, that Applicant’s plea in this case was rende red involuntary due to a subsequent deter mination by prison officia ls that Applicant was not elig ible to attend boot camp. Applicant is entitled to relief
. Ex parte Huerta , 6922

S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 52,802-C in the 89th District Court of Wichita County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of t he S heriff of W ichita C ounty to
answe r the char g es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any nece s sary bench
war rant within 10 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Co p ie s o f th is o p in io n shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre cti o n a l I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Aug ust 21, 2013 Do not publish
#### In the Matter of Scott Smith, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 619]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references to the disciplinary hearing have been *921expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot *(see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord,*243 AD2d 931).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7449

RAYMOND HOUSDEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versusWILLIAM HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-184-2) Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: March 4, 1999 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Housden, Appellant Pro Se. Rory Lee Perry, II, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Housden appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Housden v. Haines , No. CA-96-184-2 (N.D.W. Va. Sept 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

 

 

Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 No. 333 - 164898 of Ecopetrol S.A., of our report****dated July 15,2011 relating to the financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010,which appears in this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda.

 

 

Bogota, Colombia

April 30, 2012
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy
Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                                                           
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 13, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano                                                                                        
|                    |  |     |  | Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officerof Circus and Eldorado Joint Ventureand Silver Legacy Capital Corp.