alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief
Executive Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Crit S. DeMent                                   
|                        |  |  |  | Name: Crit S. DeMent                                 
|                        |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
##### 



Name of
    
    Type of
    
    State of
    
    Date ofEmployer
    
    Entity
    
    Organization
    
    ParticipationNapa Community Bank
    
    Banking Corp.
    
    California
    
    July 1, 2005
 CAPITOL BANCORP LIMITEDDated: December 1, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Cristin Reid EnglishCristin Reid EnglishChief Operating OfficerNAPA COMMUNITY BANKDated: December 1, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Dennis PedisichDennis PedisichPresident and CEO
Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan



 Exhibit 10.20.B 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 SCRIPPS NETWORKS INTERACTIVE, INC.

 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 The Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Part Two) (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective
January 1, 2009, as follows: 
 1. ARTICLE 3 of the Plan is hereby superseded and replaced in its entirety as set forth
below: 
 “ARTICLE 3. PLAN PARTICIPATION 
 An individual must be a Covered Employee in order to participate in the Plan. Commencing January 1, 2010, the Plan is frozen to otherwise eligible employees who have not completed at least one year
of Eligibility Service (as defined in the Pension Plan) as of December 31, 2009, and such employees shall not be entitled to participate in the Plan. The Plan will continue for otherwise eligible employees of Participating Employers who have
completed at least one year of Eligibility Service as of December 31, 2009.” 
 2. Except as explicitly set forth
herein, the Plan will remain in full force and effect. 
  

			
	SCRIPPS NETWORKS INTERACTIVE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		 	 Christopher R. Powell,
Senior Vice President and Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Scripps
Networks
Deborah A. BOCKEY, f/k/a Deborah A. Rasmussen, Respondent, v. Timothy W. RASMUSSEN, Appellant.

No. ED 106380

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: December 26, 2018

Anthony M. Pezzani, 13321 N. Outer Forty Road, Suite 300, Chesterfield, MO. 63017, for appellant.

Deborah A. Arbogast, 7905 Forsyth Blvd, Clayton, MO. 63105, for respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Timothy W. Rasmussen appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, denying his motion to modify his child support obligation to Deborah A. Bockey, f/k/a Deborah A. Rasmussen. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the circuit court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5603 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5603

 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2006

 Mr. Keller (for himself, Mr. McKeon, Mr. George Miller of California, 
  Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Kildee, and Mr. Hinojosa) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Second Higher Education Extension 
Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public 
Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking ``June 30, 
2006'' and inserting ``September 30, 2006''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 
2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or otherwise 
alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the durations of, 
programs contained in the amendments made by the Higher Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171) to the provisions of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection 
Act of 2004.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**FORM10-QSB**

**Section1350 Certification**

# **Quarterended March 31, 2007**

I, James B. Druck, ChiefExecutive Officer of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”) certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

(2)                                  Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated:  May 15, 2007
|   |  /s/  James B. Druck |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | James B. Druck            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
(collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 13, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephanie D. Lepori                                                                                          
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Stephanie D. Lepori, Chief Financial Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                             
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gary L. Carano                                                                                          
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Gary L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Pensacola Aviation Center, LLC, Complainant



### v.

Pensacola International Airport, City ofPensacola, FL Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FAA Docket No. 16-12-12

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance withFAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcement Proceedings, 14 CFRPart 16 (Rules ofPractice). OnApril22, 2015, counsel for the Respondent, Pensacola International Airport, filed its response to the Director's Request for Additional Information. The Director hereby acknowledges receipt ofthe Respondent's filing. Pursuantto the Rules ofPractice, §16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extendedto on orbefore July 21,2015.

Ran all S. Fiertz Di ctor, Airport Compliance and ManagementAnalysis 

# Ar£ 1-'l 1

# zo1s

DaeCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April

# da
, 2015, I served via Certified mail a true copy of the FAA's Notice ofExtension ofTime, addressed to:

Counsel for Complainant: Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. McBreen & Kopko 500 North Broadway Jericho, New York 11753 Tel: (516) 364-1095 Fax: (516) 364-0612

Counsel for Respondent: Robert J. Williams, Esq. Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP Fifth Avenue Place 120 FifthAvenue, Suite 2700 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3001 Tel: (412) 577-5223 Fax: (412) 765-3858

Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, (AC0-100)

ClaudiaRoberts Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysi
EXHIBIT
10.1

    


    RM
Enterprises International, Inc.

    


    


    February 28, 2010

     

    Spongetech
Delivery Systems, Inc.

    43 West
33rd
Street, Suite 600

    New York,
New York 10001

     

    Re:           Amendment to Stock
Repurchase Rights Letter Agreement

     

    Dear
Sirs:

     

    Reference
is made to the Stock Repurchase Rights Letter Agreement executed on July 24,
2008 (the “Agreement”), by and between Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.
(“Spongetech”) and RM Enterprises International, Inc. (“RM Enterprises”) in
connection with the grant by RM Enterprises to Spongetech of the right to
repurchase certain shares of common stock of Spongetech owned by RM
Enterprises.

     

    This will
confirm the agreement between Spongetech and RM Enterprises to amend the
Agreement, for good and valuable consideration, to extend the date by which
such repurchase rights may be exercised by Spongetech to August 31,
2011.

     

    Except as
expressly set forth herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement
shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

     

    This
amendment shall be governed by New York law and may be executed by fax or .pdf
and in counterparts.

     

    Please
confirm your agreement with the foregoing by executing and returning to us a
copy of this letter, which thereupon will become a binding agreement between
us.

     

    
      
        	 	

                Very
      truly yours,

                 

                RM
      ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

              	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                   

              	
                By:
      

              	/s/ Steven
      Moskowitz	 
	 	 	Steven
      Moskowitz	 
	 	 	Chief
      Operating Officer	 
	 	 	 	 


      

    

     

    
      
        	

                

                  Acknowledged,
      Confirmed

                  and
      Agreed to:

                   

                  SPONGETECH
      DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC.

                

              	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                By:
      

              	/s/ Michael
      L. Metter     	 	 
	 	Michael
      L. Metter	 	 
	 	President
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Philip L. Hawkins                   
|                       |  |  |  | Philip L Hawkins Chief Executive
Officer
August 6, 2015 

Cough, Cough, Cough. I am going down the Kennedy Expressway when the fumes from a rolling 

Carbon Dioxide Factory are enveloping my car. The semi gains on me as I break the speed limit trying 

to get over into the next lane. I go back to normal breathing, but not for long as my nose picks up 

acrid fumes from an oncoming truck. 

What could be done about this problem? Last week I visited a car dealership. I was impressed at the 

increased mpg the new 2015's were capable of. Then, the thought struck me- why not make truck 

manufacturers increase the mpg's on their vehicles. Not only would this lower the total amount of 

carbon dioxide in the air, but would save truck companies gas dollars, savings of which they might 

pass along to the consumers of the goods they transport. 

I wish to thank the EPA for its recent progress towards reducing pollution and heartily encourage you 

to continue down the path of a more livable environment for all. 

Testimony of Dr. Sharon F. Kissane, 15 Turning Shore Dr., South Barrington, II. 60010 during EPA 

Hearings.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Jarnail Dhaddey, President, Director,  President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary of Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended August 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results  of operations of the Company.








Dated: December 8, 2010





By: /s/ Jarnail Dhaddey


Name: Jarnail Dhaddey


Title: Director, President, Chief Executive Officer,


Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary


(Principal Executive, Financial & Accounting Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bailey TRENT-KETTELKAMP, Appellant.

WD 80815

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: December 18, 2018

Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Samuel E. Buffaloe, for Appellant.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Lisa White Hardwick, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Bailey Trent-Kettelkamp appeals his convictions following a jury trial for second-degree (felony) murder, section 565.021, RSMo 2016, and committing violence against an offender in the Department of Corrections, section 217.385, RSMo 2016, and concurrent sentences as a prior and persistent offender of twenty-five years and ten years imprisonment, *852respectively. He contends that the trial court erred in (1) overruling his *Batson* challenge to the prosecutor's peremptory strike of a venireperson and (2) overruling his motion to dismiss the felony murder charge under the merger doctrine. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 7, 2008
|----------------------



| | /s/ Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1793 Prepped by Keeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 20 ) ll-F-6 2
Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/3/200811:31:54 AM

Sheet 20of 45P. 2



## Unite d States Departmen to f th e Interio r

I N REPL Y &EFK B TO : NATIONA L PAR KSERVIC E P.O . BO X 3712 7 WASHINGTON

, D. C 20013-712 7 

## Anr - •4£iC.U±/UU ^ 

### •9 0 

### •F - - J 7 6 H -

DATE : fr/'ZMp

NUMBE R O F PAGE S T O FOLLOW :
T O / 

# : 1//-ri>

. Itik ^ ^CljTJf o yW^Wa

- 

# m 

# —

# :—

: ^ FROM :
SUBJECT : 

# <?P£

R

REMARKS : /(joft ? ^4^ 

## /&P />€ey\ 3V- PCjQnCUT/lA 

# ? & 

# 4y ,
I F YO UHAV E ANYPROBLEM S WIT H THI S FA XO RTROUBL E RECEIVIN GA FA X PLEAS E CAL L TH E INDIVIDUA L FRO N NHO N YOUAR E RECEIVIN

GTH E FAX . BLACKWELL , LAURE N COMMINS , BIL L DENNIS , JOH N DlSALVO , CARO L EADY , COLLETT E JOHNSTON , GARY KLIHINSKI , SHARON MALKIN , KARE N -491 2 NCCLELUU0 , LINDSA Y -463 1 MILLER , ABB Y 202-H8-519 3 OLWELL . PEGGY -893 6 PECK , DEBB Y -464 0 SHAFER , CRAI G -588 6 HALKER , BIL L -463 9 WATKINS , HILN

A -338 4 WILSON , RIT A 202-208 - 202-208 - 202-219 - 202-208 - 202-208 - 202-208 - 202-219 - 202-208-495 8 202-208-465 0 202-219-893 3 202-208-462 4 202-219-893 4 202-219-338 6 202-208-491 3 202-208-388 4P. 3

p . 19 8

.. . .Accordingly , the EP A believe s i t i s appropriat e fo r th e permittin

g authorit y

t o recogniz e the FLM' s expertis e i n th e identification an

d evaluatio

no f advers e effect s o n AQRVs . Th e FLM s have veil-established programs o f monitorin g an d researc h devoted t o evaluatin g the effect s o f ai r pollution o n AQRVs . I n addition , th e determinatio no f vhethe r identified impact s ar e advers e goe s t o the hear t o f the FLMs ' responsibilitie s unde r thei r ow

n statute s governin g th e Clas s I are a (e.g. . th e Nationa l Par k Servic e Organi c Act , the Wildernes s Act) . Nothwithstading th e FLM' s particula r expertise , however , the permitting authorit y ma y cal l uponexpert s o f it s ow n choosin

g t o evaluat e th e FLM' s demonstration .
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: August 10, 2009
    /s/ JAMES HYATTPresident,Chief Executive Officer, and
DirectorDate: August 10, 2009
    /s/ WILLIAM KOZIELWilliam KozielChief Financial Officer
(chief accounting officer)
Treasurer and Secretary
William A. GALVIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106453

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: April 2, 2019

James C. Egan, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant.

Eric S. Schmitt, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*680**ORDER**

PER CURIAM

The movant, William Galvin, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court's judgment denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).