alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 549

To amend the basic pay provisions of title 37, United States Code, to 

ensure pay equity for enlisted members of the reserve components who 

are selected to attend the United States Military Academy Preparatory 

School, the United States Naval Academy Preparatory School, or the 

United States Air Force Academy Preparatory School. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005

Mr. HOLT (for himself, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, and Mr. 

PALLONE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend the basic pay provisions of title 37, United States 

Code, to ensure pay equity for enlisted members of the 

reserve components who are selected to attend the United 

States Military Academy Preparatory School, the United 

States Naval Academy Preparatory School, or the United 

States Air Force Academy Preparatory School.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 549 IH 

1 SECTION 1. BASIC PAY RATES FOR RESERVE COMPONENTS 

2 MEMBERS SELECTED TO ATTEND MILITARY 

3 SERVICE ACADEMY PREPARATORY SCHOOLS. 

4 (a) PAY EQUITY FOR RESERVES.—Section 203(e)(2) 

5 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘on active duty for a period of 

7 more than 30 days shall continue to receive’’ and in8 serting ‘‘shall receive’’; and 

9 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

10 following: ‘‘or at the rate provided for cadets and 

11 midshipmen under subsection (c), whichever is 

12 greater’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 subsection (a) shall take effect on the first day of the first 

15 month beginning on or after the date of the enactment 

16 of this Act.

Æ
Roderick T. HILLIARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106134

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: November 20, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Randall G. Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

For Respondent: JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Roderick Hilliard ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, without an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant pled guilty to one count of domestic assault in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.072 RSMo., and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. Movant was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment for the first-degree domestic assault, and five years of imprisonment for armed criminal action, running concurrently for a total term of ten years of imprisonment.

*483We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		May 16, 2005







? 6 ?

? 11 ?
MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)





? 31 ?

- 39 ?

- 39 ?
#### Anna Giannini *v.*Gabriel Giannini.

(No. 7065)

Submitted March 1, 1932.

Decided March 8, 1932.

*Pinsky <& Mahan,*and *Hcmdlan, Garden & Matthews,*for appellant.

*Ramsay <& Wilkin,*for appellee.

Litz, Judge:

In the circuit court of Brooke County (at March 1928 term) Anna Gianini obtained a divorce *a mensa et thoro*from her husband, Gabriel Giannini. She was also decreed certain property and the custody of their infant children. They have since lived apart except for one week in September, 1929. Within this period of attempted reconciliation she transferred to him certain real estate and personal property. She instituted this suit in November, 1929, for divorce *a mensa et thoro*upon the theory that the former decree had been vacated by the temporary resumption of marital relations. He first filed an answer to the bill herein, denying the right of plaintiff to any relief, and later an amended answer in the nature of a cross-bill, praying for an absolute divorce on the ground of adultery. After the taking of proof upon the issues raised by the pleadings, the court entered a final decree dismissing the bill and cross-bill, upon the ground *687that tbe decree in the former suit was in effect. Tbe conclusion that it was, therefore, unnecessary to grant plaintiff relief which she already enjoyed did not justify dismissal of the cross-bill.

Dismissal of an original bill does not, ordinarily, justify dismissal of a cross-bill, setting up new matter and praying for affirmative relief. Hogg’s Equity Procedure (Carlin’s Ed.), sec. 223; *Big Huff Coal Co.*v. *Thomas,*76 W. Va. 161, 85 S. E. 171; *Pethel*v. *McCullough,*49 W. Va. 520, 39 S. E. 199.

The decree, complained of by defendant, is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and Remanded.*
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Wilson Cheng, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
      of
      Directors and Treasurer of BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC. (the "Company"), DOES
      HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.
      The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28,
      2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
      this **** 19th
      day
      of April, 2006.





**/s/** **Wilson
              Cheng**Wilson Cheng
              CEO, Chairman of the Board of Directors and
                Treasurer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC. and will be retained by BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5103

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of the former Konnarock 

Lutheran Girls School in Smyth County, Virginia, which 

is currently owned by the United States and administered by the Forest Service, to facilitate the restoration 

and reuse of the property, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5103 EH

1 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER KONNAROCK LU2 THERAN GIRLS SCHOOL, JEFFERSON NA3 TIONAL FOREST, SMYTH COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 

4 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Ag5 riculture shall convey, without consideration, to the Evan6 gelical Lutheran Coalition for Mission in Appalachia (in 

7 this section referred to as the ‘‘recipient’’) all right, title, 

8 and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of 

9 real property in the Mount Rogers National Recreation 

10 Area, Smyth County, Virginia, located in the vicinity of 

11 the junction of Virginia Routes 600 and 603, consisting 

12 of not more than six acres, and containing the former 

13 Konnarock Lutheran Girls School and its outbuildings, as 

14 depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Proposed Area for New 

15 Legislation or Sale–Konnarock School–Being a Portion of 

16 USA Tract J–935’’. 

17 (b) CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance 

18 under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that 

19 the recipient accept the real property described in such 

20 subsection in its condition at the time of the conveyance, 

21 commonly known as conveyance ‘‘as is’’. 

22 (c) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—Subject to the 

23 acreage limitation specified in subsection (a), the exact 

24 acreage and legal description of the real property to be 

25 conveyed under such subsection shall be determined by a 
3

•HR 5103 EH

1 survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of the survey 

2 shall be borne by the recipient. 

3 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

4 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi5 tions in connection with the conveyance under subsection 

6 (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 

7 interests of the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5103

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of the former 

the property, and for other purposes.Service, to facilitate the restoration and reuse of United States and administered by the Forest County, Virginia, which is currently owned by the Konnarock Lutheran Girls School in Smyth
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**I, Donald L. Denney, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have; a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluations; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: November 9, 2005 By:  /s/ Donald L. Denney             Donald L. Denney      President and Chief Executive Officer  
18
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

LAN TU TRINH,

Petitioner

v.

KATHLEEN TRINH AND LT

INTERNATIONAL BEAUTY SCHOOL

INC.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 37 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of May , 2018

, the Petition for Review and the Petition for

Leave to Amend Petition for Review are DENIED.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 17th 

day of March, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

David Michael Dollins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00133-CR

Trial Court No. F-8840

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, David Michael Dollins, pay all costs of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 13th day of May, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby
certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephanie D. Lepori                                                                                          
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Stephanie D. Lepori, Chief Financial Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.
#### Dina LaFond, Respondent, v Star Time Dance & Performing Arts Center, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[719 NYS2d 273]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Star Time Dance & Performing Arts Center appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 20, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff, a tap dancing student who was injured while tap dancing at the appellant’s premises, had taken weekly lessons for approximately 15 years before the accident. She was sufficiently experienced to appreciate and consent to the risks associated with tap dancing on a floor that she admittedly knew was slippery before the accident. Therefore, summary judgment should have been awarded to the appellant *(see, Morgan v State of New York,*90 NY2d 471; *Maddox v City of New York,*66 NY2d 270; *Cole v New York Racing Assn.,*24 AD2d 993, *affd*17 NY2d 761). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Axcan Intermediate Holdings Inc. (the Company) for
the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve Gannon, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: December 22, 2008



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steve Gannon                                          
|Steve Gannon                                              
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 54 (Monday, March 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Acceptability, Feasibility and Validity of 
Genital Self-Sampling for HPV Among Men, PEP 2009-R-01

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

    Time and Date: 10 a.m.-12 p.m., May 18, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of ``Acceptability, Feasibility and 
Validity of Genital Self-Sampling for HPV Among Men, PEP 2009-R-
01.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Linda Shelton, Public 
Health Analyst, Coordinating Center for Health and Information 
Service, Office of the Director, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E21, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 498-1194.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 6, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
 [FR Doc. E9-6220 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
CHARLESTON.

#### E. J. Thomas *et al. v.*William Haynes *et al.*

(No. 6161)

Submitted January 24, 1930.

Decided February 4, 1930.

*J. B. Jones*and P. *H. Murphy,*for appellants.

*A. M. Belcher,*for appellees.

Litz, Judge:

This suit was instituted by E. J. Thomas, trustee, Charles B. Franks, C. A. McIntire, A. C. Stickel and E. J. Thomas, as owners of the coal on and underlying a large tract of land in Kanawha county, to enjoin the defendants, William Haynes, Nonora O’Connor, J. G. Carpenter, Rufus Haynes, Daniel *530Haynes, James Holmes, W. C. Young, America Honaker, Jessie Jordon, Julia C. Whittington, Edwin Honaker, L. C. Harper and William Tate, from mining or removing any of said coal, and to cancel the deeds under which the defendants assert title to parts thereof in so far as any of said title papers constitutes a cloud upon the title of the plaintiffs. The defendants, respectfully, assert title to separate parcels of said coal by adverse mining, under color of title, for ten years.

On a former appeal, a decree of the lower court, dissolving a temporary injunction, was reversed and the cause remanded, 100 W. Va. 478. Thereafter, the parties, by counsel, agreed to a dismissal of the suit as to any of the defendants establishing color of title to the interest in the coal which he or she claimed. The decree, complained of, was entered pursu-. ant to said agreement. After reciting the introduction by the defendants, J. G. Carpenter, America Honaker, Edwin Honaker, Willis Tate, Rufus Haynes, James Holmes, Daniel Haynes, Jessie Jordon, W. C. Young, John O’Connor, L. C. Harper and Julia C. Whittington, of the title deeds to the interest in the coal asserted by each of them and of evidence by the plaintiffs, it decrees that each of such defendants has color of title to the interest in the coal claimed by him or her and- dismisses the bill as to them.

The plaintiffs have appealed without making the evidence upon which the decree complained of is based a part of the record. As the decision is presumed to have been based upon sufficient proof, the appeal must be dismissed except as to the defendant, J. G. Carpenter. Where the contrary does not appear from the record, by bills of exception or otherwise, the judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction will always be presumed on appeal or writ of error to be right and founded on sufficient evidence. *Snodderly*v. *Fairmont,*23 W. Va. 472.

It appearing from the title papers of J. G. Carpenter, exhibited in the record of the first appeal, that he does not have such color of title to the interest in the coal claimed by him as could have ripened into good title by adverse mining prior to the institution of the suit, the decree, in so far as it dis*531misses him from the bill, is reversed; but in all other respects affirmed.

*Reversed in part; affirmed in part.*