alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.5**

 

[EKAE LETTERHEAD]

 

Derek Peine

922 A. Ave. East

Albia, IA 52531

 

Dear Derek:

 

This letter will confirm the decision of the Board of Directors of EastKansas Agri-Energy, L.L.C. to offer you employment as its Plant Manager.  If accepted, your employment will commence onApril 4, 2005.  You will bepaid on a salary basis, on our normal payroll intervals, at the annual rate ofEighty-six Thousand Dollars ($86,000.00). You will receive a one-time payment of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00)to defray your moving expenses on April 15, 2005.  You will also be eligible for payment of aneight percent annual bonus based on performance guidelines that will bedetermined by the Board.  All other termsand conditions of your employment shall be contained in the policies adopted bythe Board as part of its Employee Handbook covering all employees of EastKansas Agri-Energy, L.L.C.

 

Please acknowledge your acceptance of our employment offer by yoursignature below.

 

 
|                               |  /s/  William R. Pracht                                               |   |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               | For the  Board of Directors                                                |
|                               | East Kansas  Agri-Energy, L.L.C.      5-5-05 |
|                               |                                                                       |
|                               |                                                                       |
|    /s/  Derek Peine | 5-5-05                                                                     |   |   |
| Derek Peine                        |                                                                       |
|                                    |                                                                            |        |  |  |

 

----
05/25/201 0 09:5 8 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 0001/00 2 

^^gui Dr;p>iMtii(:rii 

3520 I Ijick;; Cross Roafl 

llhllrlinil R, ?ra Roof 

Meinpnis, IN .•JHl^'h 

li;ii;|)lii.ni'. 001131 &60U 

••PORu^lOH 

Expres s •.:.:'• ; 

VIA FEDEX 

May 4, 2010 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 A/) nO / n /'^/)/ n A^:?: ? 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, A(JC-430 ^r \ V S WD t ^ I / c/^' ^ "613^ 3 

REt Request for Formal HeHring - FAA Case Number: 2009SW7U0276 

Dear Sir: 

In response to the I'inal Notice of Proposed Civil Penally that was issued in FAA case number 

2009SW700276 and received by my office on May 3, 2010, Federal Express, in accord;ince with 

14 CI'R 13.16(g)(2)(ii), respectfully requests a hearing in this matter. 

A copy of this request is being sent to BIlyn Ponton, Attorney, Southwest Region, Federal 

Aviation Administration. 

All correspondence regarding this matter should be sent to my attention at 3620 Hacks Cros.s; 

Road, 3rd Kloor, Building B, Memphis, Tennessee 38125. 

If there arc any questions, please call me at (901) 434-8632 or email cerelts(a),fedcx.com. 

Very truly yours, 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

Ikujt^ ^^QM'. 

Courtney K. I'cltJ 

Senior Attorney 

Regulatory AlTairs 

(901)434-8632 

(901)434-8283 (f) 

C.»/7761i«4 
05/25/201 0 09:5 8 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 0002/00 2 

cc; Pat Oppcnhcimer- Corporate Safety, Federal Express 

David Littlejohn - Corporate Safety, Federal Express 

Ellyn Ponton, Attorney - Federal Aviation Administration 

Southwest Region - ASW-7 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Pantelis Zachos, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Gold Standard MiningCorp.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  January 25, 2011



/s/   Pantelis Zachos

Pantelis Zachos

Chief Financial Officer, and Director
P.1 

OAR Box 1107 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

43) IV-A-2 

Docket Number: 

A-81-21 

Printed 4/11/2008 3:03:46 PM Sheet 43 of 90 
A-8'1-21 

P.2 

IV-A-2 

EPA-«tou/ o-cm-u i yj 

Fugitive Emission Sources 

of Organic Compounds -

Additional Information on Emissions, 

Emission Reductions, and Costs 

1 

Emission Standards and Engineering Division 

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Office of Air, Noise and Radiation 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

April 1982 

I 
P.3 

fugitive emissions. With new information available, EPA can use a Leak 

Detection and Repair (LDAR) model which better represents observed fugitive 

emission behavior. The LDAR model, developed in September, 1981, also is 

more flexible in allowing calculations for different types of leak detection 

and repair programs. 

1.3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

The major results of EPA's review of the technical basis presented in 

the BID, new information which has become available, and public comments are 

summarized here. Details and reasoning supporting the results may be found 

in the corresponding sections. 

1.3.1 Emission Factors (Section 2) 

The emission factors which EPA plans to use in estimating fugitive 

emissions of VOC from SOCMI are shown in Table 1-1. They were developed by 

using (1) SOCMI leak frequencies (i.e., number of leaking and non-leaking 

fugitive emission sources) and (2) emission factors determined in petroleum 

refineries and SOCMI units for leaking and non-leaking fugitive emission 

sources. The resulting emission factors are lower than the emission factors 

presented in the BID for all equipment components except flanges and 

sampling connections. 

TABLE 1-1. EMISSION FACTORS FOR AVERAGE SOCMI UNIT, kg/hr/source 

Source 

Average SOCMI Emission Factor 

(kg/hr/source) 

Pumps - light liquid 

- heavy liquid 

Valves - gas 

- light liquid 

- heavy liquid 

Compressors 

Safety/relief valves -

Flanges 

Open-ended lines 

Sampling connections 

gas 

0.0494 

0.0214 

0.0056 

0.0071 

0.00023 

0.228 

0.104 

0.00083 

0.0017 

0.0150 

1-4 
P.4 

TABLE 5-17. COSTS FOR AN OPEN-ENDED LINE CAP 

One 2.5cm screwed valve $30 

Installation 15 

Total (last quarter 1978 dollars) $45 

Annualized Costs 

Caps for Open-Ended Lines3 $7 

Maintenance & Misc. 4 

Total ($/year)$ll 

aBased on 10 year equipment life and 10 percent interest (CRF = 0.163), 

Based on 9 percent of total capital cost. 

5-29
L.R.S., Respondent, v. C.A.S., Appellant.

No. ED 106260

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Filed: May 22, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 5, 2018

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Brian E. McGovern, 825 Maryville Centre Drive, Suite 300, Chesterfield, MO 63017.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Christopher R. Wegner, 7908 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 200, Clayton, MO 63105.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

C.A.S. appeals the judgment entered after remand, in which the trial court denied his request to recalculate maintenance and ordered him to pay L.R.S.'s attorney fees on appeal. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary A. Crisalli, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 768]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 23, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a legal secretary without good cause. The record establishes that claimant and the attorney she worked for raised their voices at one another after the attorney became upset that claimant took a message from a client rather than keep him on hold until the attorney finished his other telephone conversation. Claimant thereafter left her employment after the attorney stated that if she did not like the way the office was run she could leave. It has been held that a disagreement with one’s supervisor does not constitute good cause for leaving employment *(see, Matter of Collins [Sweeney],*239 AD2d 758, 759; *Matter of Arturi [Landmark Dev.*Corp.— *Sweeney],*215 AD2d 845). Moreover, to the extent that claimant maintains that she was fired, the employer’s inquiry as to whether claimant was going to answer the telephone that was ringing as she packed her belongings should have indicated to her that she was, in fact, not fired.

We also reject claimant’s assertion of a due process violation inasmuch as the record establishes that, despite being aware of her options, claimant elected to proceed with the hearing without counsel *(see, Matter of Palmer [Rescue Mission Alliance*— Commissioner *of Labor],*273 AD2d 525, 526).

Cardona, P. J., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6016

LARRY EUGENE SMITH, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COLBERT L. REPASS; BEN PILLMON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-96-853-5-BO)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Eugene Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court order dismissing his

claims of loss of good time credits and segregation after a physical altercation with prison guards. We dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither

a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1997 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-28-1997

Williams v. Runyon

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket

97-5035

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Williams v. Runyon" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 268.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/268
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 No. 97-5035

 Williams vs. Runyon, et al

 The following modifications have been made to the Court's 

Opinion issued on November 28, 1997 in the above-entitled appeal

and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion:

 On page 3, second line from the top, the last word "sex"

should be replaced with the word "sexual."

 On page 4, first line, the word "her" should be replaced

with the word "Williams'".

 On page 5 of the slip opinion, 10 lines from the bottom:

"Red. R. Civ. P." should be "Fed. R. Civ. P."

 On page 6, 5 lines into Section II, there should be a period

after "Fed."

 On page 6, 3 lines from the bottom, the word " defendants' "

preceding right to raise...' should be replaced with

"defendant's".

 

 On page 8, in the third full paragraph, the word "the"

preceding "Williams had exhausted" should be deleted.

 On pages 8 and 9, the last two lines of each: "April 24,

1995" should be replaced with "April 24, 1996"

 

 Very truly yours,

 /s/ P. Douglas Sisk,

 Clerk

Dated: December 15, 1997
Candice R. WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 106591

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.

Filed: November 27, 2018

Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Philip M. Hess, J, and Darrell E. Missey, Sp.J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Candice R. West ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying her motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### Stella C. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Edgar HOOVER et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15007.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

June *2,*1965.

Stella C. Davis, Chicago, 111., for appellant.

Edward V. Hanrahan, U. S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, John Powers Crowley, Thomas W. James, Gilbert Drucker, Asst. U. S. Attys., Chicago, 111., for appellees.

Before DUFFY, ENOCH and EILEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeared in the District Court and here, pro se. She has commenced and conducted much litigation in the federal and state courts, asserting various claims of fraud, conspiracy, legal chicanery, etc. See Davis v. Foreman, 7 Cir., 239 F.2d 579; Davis v. Foreman, 7 Cir., 251 F.2d 421; Daviditis v. National Bank of Mattoon, 7 Cir., 251 F.2d 299, and Daviditis v. National Bank of Mattoon, 7 Cir., 262 F.2d 884.

In the instant case, the District Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and that the complaint filed failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We think the District Court was correct.

Affirmed.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC,
        the general partner of the Partnership

Date:	   May 15, 2009





? 6 ?

- 5 -
MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)





? 84 ?

- 37 -

- 85 -
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 9, 2007
|----------------------



| | /s/Andrew C. Frenette
Andrew C. Frenette
Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          37,296
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          97,917
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                69,973
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,935
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         621,773
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           621,372
<LOANS>                                      4,191,269
<ALLOWANCE>                                     45,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,596,232
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,269,637
<SHORT-TERM>                                   754,202
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             25,668
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,078,914
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                     377,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,596,232
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                347,086
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               59,277
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               406,363
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             149,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             251,762
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          154,601
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    9,114
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,060
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                132,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,934
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      43,934
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.03
<LOANS-NON>                                     14,700
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   777
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                38,458
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   19,066
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,525
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               45,405
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            45,405
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>