alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(b)

ENERGY FUTURE COMPETITIVE HOLDINGS COMPANY

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CFO

The undersigned, Paul M. Keglevic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 18th day of February, 2010.



/s/ PAUL M. KEGLEVICName:

Paul M. KeglevicTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company and will be retained by Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PRELIMINARY AGENDA U.S. DEPARTMENT OFENERGY OFFICE OFENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PUBLIC HEARING ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS

FOR COMMERCIAL AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS PLACE OF HEARING: FORRESTAL BUILDING 1000INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW ROOM 1E-245 WASHINGTON, DC 20585 TELEPHONE: 202/586-9127 TELEFAX: 202/586-4617 DATE AND TIME: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2000 9:00 A.M.

- 3:00 P.M. PURPOSE OFTHE HEARING The purpose ofthispublic hearing isto hear the views ofinterested persons on the proposed requirements for commercial air conditioners and heat pumps. The Department will consider the views presented and comments submitted in formulating a finalrule. I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS I. AGENDA REVIEW III. COMMERCIAL AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS - TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION A. General Statements B. Definition and Scope ofCoverage 1. Coverage ofHeating-Only Heat Pumps 2. Coverage ofComputer Room Air Conditioners 3. Coverage ofEquipment with a Variable-Speed Drive C. Test Procedures for the Measurement ofEnergy Efficiency 1.Test Procedures the Department Intends to Adopt 2. Minimum External Static Pressure 3.Test Procedures for Water-Source HeatPumps D. Other Topics IV ADJOURNMENT
Edward J. HUGHES III, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106296

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: December 4, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Gwenda Renee Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

For Respondent: JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*903*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Edward J. Hughes III ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing that he had been induced by his plea counsel ("Plea Counsel") to enter an unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary plea by neglecting to explain the difference between concurrent and consecutive sentencing, and by failing to advise him of the possibility of consecutive sentencing before his plea. Movant pled guilty to the class C felony of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of Section 571.070, RSMo. 2000; the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202; and three class A misdemeanors. He was sentenced to two consecutive terms of 15 years' imprisonment for the possession of a firearm and controlled substance. The execution of his sentence was suspended with a five-year probationary term, however he was unable to comply with the terms of probation and the court revoked his probation and ordered the sentences to be executed.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,880]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 13, 2009 in response to a petition on behalf of workers of America's Business Operations, Dell USA L.P., Round Rock, Texas.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of March 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6517 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5539 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 Union Calendar No. 379
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5539

                          [Report No. 109-639]

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Reauthorization 
                                  Act.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2006

  Mr. Pombo (for himself, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Gilchrest, Mrs. Drake, Mr. 
  Kennedy of Minnesota, Mr. Dingell, and Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

                           September 6, 2006

Addditional sponsors: Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Kind, Mr. Putnam, Mr. 
 Gordon, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Kline, Ms. Hart, Mr. 
Kildee, Mr. Ford, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Melancon, Mr. Miller 
            of North Carolina, and Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas

                           September 6, 2006

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House 
          on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 7, 
                                 2006]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Reauthorization 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North American Wetlands Conservation 
Reauthorization Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ``fiscal year 2007'' and 
inserting ``each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.
            Amend the title so as to read: ``A bill to reauthorize the 
        North American Wetlands Conservation Act.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 379

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5539

                          [Report No. 109-639]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Reauthorization 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 6, 2006

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House 
          on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed`
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 02/02-0535] 

Notice is hereby given that Argentum Capital Partners, LP, 60 Madison Avenue, Suite 701, New York, NY 10010, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730 (2009)). Argentum Capital Partners, LP proposes to provide a bridge loan to M Cubed Technologies, Inc., 921 Main Street, Monroe, CT 06468. The financing is contemplated for working capital and general corporate purposes. 

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Argentum Capital Partners II, LP, an Associate of Argentum Capital Partners, LP, owns more than ten percent of M Cubed Technologies, Inc. 

Therefore, this transaction is considered a financing of an Associate requiring an exemption. Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Acting Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. 

March 16, 2009. 

Harry Haskins, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.

 [FR Doc. E9-6189 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE
ex10-13.htm








Exhibit 10.13

 

AMENDMENT

OF

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

WHEREAS, OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC (the “Company”) has previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”)
with Michael D. Weaver (the “Executive”) dated as of March 11, 2009, setting forth the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 

Base Salary. Effective January 1, 2010, Section 3(c)(i)
of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

(i)           Base Salary. During the Employment Period, the Executive shall receive an annual base salary of $333,000, subject to increase by the Board of Directors of
Otelco (the “Board”), which Annual Base Salary shall be further subject to annual increase by an amount equal to reflect the increase in the cost of living, if any, between the date of the immediately preceding increase and the date of each such adjustment, based upon the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers, or, if that index is discontinued, a similar index prepared by a department
or agency of the United States government (as so increased and adjusted, the “Annual Base Salary”). The Annual Base Salary shall be paid in accordance with the customary payroll practices of the Company, subject to withholding any other payroll taxes.

 

SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as herein expressly amended, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

 

March 5, 2010                                                                                                     OTELCO
TELEPHONE LLC



	 	         	 	 
	
 
	
 
	/s/ Curtis L. Garner, Jr.	 




                       By
Curtis L. Garner, Jr.

                       Its
Chief Financial Officer

 

                       Michael
D. Weaver

 

                       /s/
Michael D. Weaver
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 08/25 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** Clean Power Plan Letter of Support from Colorado Western Slope Entities **SUMMARY** EPA Administrator, Gina McCarthy, and EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator, Shaun McGrath, received a letter of support from various Colorado Western Slope entities, including elected officials, businesses, and health professionals. The letter is dated August 1 4, 2014 . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **Attachment** Letter of Support
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 393 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 393

                         Honoring all families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2023

Mr. Robert Garcia of California (for himself, Mr. Ruiz, Mr. Pocan, Ms. 
 Craig, Ms. Balint, and Mr. Frost) submitted the following resolution; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                         Honoring all families.

Whereas there are 1,800,000 adopted children in the United States;
Whereas more than 320,000 children in the United States were cared for by foster 
        families in fiscal year 2021;
Whereas 13 percent of adults in the United States are stepparents;
Whereas for many children in the United States, family members and loved ones 
        serving as guardians fulfill the roles and responsibilities of parents 
        every day;
Whereas millions of people and families in the United States face barriers to 
        biological parenthood, including, but not limited to, LGBTQI+ people, 
        people with disabilities, people who cannot conceive, people who 
        experience pregnancy loss, and more; and
Whereas between 2,000,000 and 3,700,000 children under age 18 have an LGBTQI+ 
        parent who may not have a biological relationship to their child: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) a parent's ability to contribute to their child's 
        growth and success is not defined by the circumstances by which 
        they became a parent; and
            (2) families of all backgrounds and circumstances deserve 
        to be recognized, respected, and celebrated.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 29980-1-II.

Division Two.

May 4, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stephen Lee Shores, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lewis County, No. 02-1-00761-3, Richard L. Brosey, J., entered February 3, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., and Morgan, J.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130390 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130390 

 COA: 256300 

Kalamazoo CC: 03-001012-FC 

ROBERT LEE DYSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0152

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID JON KINDT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 22, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 16 2020

12/16/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0152
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,000,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,696
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     864,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,000,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,919,556
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,968,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (13,131,457)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             288,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,794,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,794,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,794,204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   249.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   249.18
        

</TABLE>
STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Sherrie RUNGE, Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 105601

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: April 10, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 9, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Katharine Anne Dolin, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, 221 W. High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender's Office, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court's judgment sustaining Sherrie Runge's Motion to Dismiss the State's Felony Complaint, which charged Defendant *61with receiving stolen property in violation of Section 570.080, RSMo 20001 , based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

Section 570.080 has since been repealed, effective January 1, 2017.