alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 4.1.2-1 P1 Volumes

562,754 59,100 1,000 67,989 0 67,989 Out 2

6 100,595 100,768 121,137 0 121,137 Out 25-27

7A 100,382 100,647 116,379 0 116,379 Out 28-41

7B 50,369 48,028 54,542 2,581 57,123 Out 42-44,84-85

8 46,843 36,010 565 44,081 0 44,081 Out 47

9A (9) 81,665 48,214 1,135 56,950 5,316 62,266 Out 48-51,80-82

9C (1) 80,020 29,568 41,094 0 41,094 Out 53-55

11 142,740 144,232 176,346 0 176,346 Out 56-57

12 38,333 38,333 44,271 0 44,271 Out (3)

P1 Soil Stockpiles NA NA NA 6,031 11,676 (5) 17,707 Out 80-82

Subtotal 1,354,592 984,824 4,100 1,069,652 120,924 1,190,576 NA NA

CAMU Soil Remediation Project 207,442 4,685 254,584 0 0 Out 23)

CAMU Soil Remediation Project (RCRA-E8uivalent Test Plots) 3,411 3,931 0 0 Out (3)

CAMU Soil Remediation Project North Access Control Area) 13,744 16,795 0 0 Out (34

Existing (Sanitary) Landfills Soil

Remediation- Section 1 10,308 11,930 0 0 Out 58-59

Misc. Southern Tier Soil (SSA-2a)

Remediation Project 5,268 5,919 0 0 Out 56-57

Misc. Southern Tier Soil

Remediation Project (Fisherman's

Parking Lot) 4,015 4,367 0 0 Out 60

Secondary Basins Soil

Remediation Project 19,758 23,558 0 0 In (0.75 ac.) 1-23

Section 35 Soil Rernediation 29,222 36,781 0 0 In (8.49 ac.) (6) 1-23

Existing (Sanitary) Landfills

Remediation - Section 36 2,637 3,125 0 0 Out 46

North Plants Structures Demolition

and Removal (Chemical Sewer) NA 4,316 0 0 Out 4)

Ilt II(SaIIIIIIIIitaLIIIlIIIll I III

00048771 PMC4697 - 2
Table 4.1.2-1 P1 Volumes

South Plants Soil Remediation

Project (Phase II) (Outside BA 11

Boundary) 6,271 6,473 0 0 In (0.45 ac.) 56-57

Section 36 BOA 41,299 57,921 0 0 In (21.44 ac.) 62-67

CAMU Soil Remediation Project

(ELF Construction Project -

Section 25) 2,995 3,222 0 0 Out 61

Subtotal NA 346,370 4,685 432,922 0 0 NA NA

Total 1,354,592 1,331,194 8,785 1,502,574 120,924 1,623,498 NA NA

Notes:

(1) Approximately 68,192 bcy of soil from BA 9C was redesignated as 'clean' based on sample results.

(2) Refer to Section 1.6 for Boundary Refinements

(3) Survey documented in the CAMU soil removal CCR (MK 1998) (Ref. Table 8.2-1)

(4) Survey documented in the North Plants Structures Demolition CCR (TtFW 2004a)

(5) A stockpile was generated during excavation of P1 soil during construction of the North Plants haul road. The PIsoil was subsequently stockpiled in an

area of BA 9A Parcel 2.

(6) Includes soil within the TRER 3 5SE- 1 area, originally designated and removed as P 1 soil.

(7) See Figures 4.1.5-1 and 4.1.5-2 for location ofP1 areas within the AMA.

(8) Approximately 220,907 bcy of soil from BA 4 was redesignated as 'clean' based on sample results.

(9) Approximately 20,509 bcy of soil from BA 9A was redesignated as 'clean' based on sample results.
Exhibit 10.26






Exhibit 10.26




Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.




Director Compensation Program




The Board of Directors approved a modification to the 2008 director compensation plan. Effective
November 1, 2009, the annual fee paid to the chairperson of the Compensation Committee was
increased from $15,000 to $25,000. Otherwise, the terms of the 2008 compensation plan set forth
below remain unchanged.



Under the plan, the Directors receive an annual retainer of $40,000 payable in a mix of stock and
cash, with a required minimum equity component of 25%.



The annual fee paid to the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance committee is
$7,000. The annual fee paid to the Lead Director and the chairperson of the Audit Committee is
$15,000. As stated above, the annual fee paid to the chairperson of the Compensation Committee is
now $25,000. Any special committee chair receives a fee of $25,000 paid annually. All of the
foregoing fees are payable in cash.



Directors earn $1,500 for each in-person Board Meeting and $1,000 for each Board call and each
committee meeting. These fees are payable in cash.



Each non-employee director also receives an annual grant of $75,000 of value upon
election/re-election to the Board. This grant will be comprised of a mix of restricted stock and
options, all of which will vest on the first anniversary of the grant.
#### Andrew Fowler, Appellant, v CCS Queens Corporation et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. BDT Contracting Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 270]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated August 16, 1999, as granted those branches of the respective motions of the respondents CCS Queens Corporation and R&A Construction Corporation, and the respondent 61-01 Realty Corporation, which were for summary judgment dismissing his cause of action based on Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The plaintiff was employed as a truck driver by BDT Contracting Corporation (hereinafter BDT). The plaintiff was injured while attempting to bend a rod that was hanging over the side of a tractor trailer, as instructed by BDT. As the plaintiff pushed the rod, it sprung back and hit him on the right side of his head. CCS Queens Corporation (hereinafter CCS) was the general contractor at the construction site and 61-01 Realty Corporation was the owner of the construction site. CCS contracted R&A Construction Corporation to perform excavation work, who in turn subcontracted BDT, to assist with the excavation work.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the respondents’ respective motions which were for summary judgment dismissing his Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. The Industrial Code provisions cited by the plaintiff are either inapplicable to the case at bar *(see,*12 NYCRR 23-1.7 [e] [2]; 23-1.8 [c] [1]; *McCole v City of New York,*221 AD2d 605) or lack the specificity required to qualify as a predicate for liability under Labor Law § 241 (6) *(see,*12 NYCRR 23-2.1 [b]; *Lynch v Abax, Inc.,*268 AD2d 366; *Mendoza v Marche Libre Assocs.,*256 AD2d 133).

The instant case is distinguishable from our decision in *Her*
      *506
      *man v St. John’s Episcopal Hosp.*(242 AD2d 316), since in that case only the provision of 12 NYCRR 23-2.1 (a) was at issue, where as here the plaintiff relies on 12 NYCRR 23-2.1 (b). Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 54 (Monday, March 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12165-12166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 
26, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (6), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(5), (6), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

[[Page 12166]]

    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
March 26, 2009 will be:

<bullet> Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
<bullet> Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
<bullet> Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: March 19, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-6434 Filed 3-19-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keeley SMASHEY, Appellant.

No. ED 105485

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, NORTHERN DIVISION.

Filed: June 26, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 31, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied October 30, 2018

Johnathan S. Hoover, 201 North Third Street, Suite 301, Hannibal, MO 63401, for appellant.

Garreth Cooksey, Robert E. Rapp, 906 Broadway, Room 7, Hannibal, MO 63401, for respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM

*54Keeley Smashey appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of third-degree assault of a law-enforcement officer, in violation of Section 565.083. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Veronica Vallejo, VP Finance and Controller of OncoSec Medical Incorporated (the “**Company**”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the “**Report**”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:    October 25, 2011 | By:                               | /s/   VERONICA VALLEJO |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------|
|                                 | Veronica   Vallejo                |
| * *                             | *VP   Finance and Controller*     |
| * *                             | *(Principal   Financial Officer)* |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OncoSec Medical Incorporated and will be retained by OncoSec Medical Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
----

----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 1.     | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2.     | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                |                                                                 |   |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| March      30, 2009 | /s/      Ralph E. Schank                                             |   |
| Date                | Ralph      E. Schank                                                 |
|                | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer |
Exhibit 99.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

          The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (collectively, the“Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated: May 14, 2003 | By:    | /s/ BRUCE C. SEXTON                                                                                               |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                                                                                                   |
|                |   | **Bruce C. Sexton, Chief Financial Officer of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.** |

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been furnished to Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. and will be retained by Circus andEldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
E.R.B., BY Next Friend S.L.B., and S.L.B. Individually, Respondents, v. A.M.K., Appellant.

No. ED 106400

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: November 20, 2018

Sonya D. Brandt, P.O. Box 338, Linn, MO 63051, For Petitioners/Respondents.

Paul T. Graham, 515 E. High St. Ste. 102, Jefferson City, MO 65101, For Respondent/Appellant.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

A.M.K. appeals the trial court's judgment and decree of paternity that awarded her and S.L.B. joint physical custody and joint legal custody of the parties' child. Finding that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit
32.1





Certification





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18
U.S.C. Section 1350)





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Radiant Logistics, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





DATE:
      October 2, 2009BY:
                  /s/ Bohn H. CrainChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Radiant Logistics, Inc and will be retained by Radiant Logistics,
Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen J. Fanning, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solta Medical, Inc.;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
August 7, 2012



/s/ Stephen J. FanningStephen J. FanningPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Kyle M. SHORT, Appellant, v. Michael S. WRIGHT, Scott Schoenfeld and Ryan Welschmeyer, Respondents.

No. ED 107067

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: March 12, 2019

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kyle M. Short, Pro Se, M.E.C.C. #1059205, Old Highway 66, Pacific, MO 63069.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Travis A. Elliott, 901 St. Louis Street, Suite 600, Springfield, MO 65806.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

*625**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Kyle M. Short ("Appellant") appeals the judgment dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment. Because Appellant failed to state a claim, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                   |                                 |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                   | **Electric                Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc.** |
|                                   |                                                   |                                 |
| Date:                November 14, 2005 | By:                                                    | /s/                Gaylord M. Karren |

|   |   | Chief                Executive Officer Chief                Financial Officer |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,452] 

                    By application postmarked February 27, 2009, the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers (IUE), Local 188643 requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on January 9, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 2, 2009 (74 FR 5871).                 

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of vinyl replacement windows and doors did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred. 

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided additional information regarding imports of vinyl replacement windows and doors and alleged that the customers might have increased imports of vinyl replacement windows and doors in the relevant period. 

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. 

## Conclusion 

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of March 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-6239 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P