alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,044]


Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, Evart, MI; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 12, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Pittsburgh Glass Works, 
LLC, Evart, Michigan.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6521 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Dorian ALEXANDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106389

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: February 13, 2019

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Randall Brachman, Office of the State Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Karen Louise Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Dorian Alexander appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order" ("Judgment") denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential *695or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
----

----

I Informācija

Komisija

----

Lēmumu par finanšu palīdzības piešķiršanu saskaņā ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 1164/94 par Kohēzijas Fonda dibināšanu, kurā grozījumi izdarīti ar Regulām (EK) Nr. 1264/1999 un (EK) Nr. 1265/1999, galveno elementu publikācija

(2005/C 128/01)

KIPRA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

ČEHIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

IGAUNIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

GRIEĶIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

UNGĀRIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

LATVIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

LIETUVA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

MALTA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

POLIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

PORTUGĀLE — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

SLOVĀKIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide

Atbalsta joma: transports

SLOVĒNIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: vide un transports

SPĀNIJA — 2004

Atbalsta joma: transports

Atbalsta joma: vide

----

(1)   Saistībā ar šo lēmumu par grozījumiem nav veikts nekāds palielinājums dotācijai no Kohēzijas fonda. 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 548 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 548

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2005

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 200 West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, as the ``Tony Hall Federal 
                Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 200 
West 2nd Street in Dayton, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the 
``Tony Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Tony Hall Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 8, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Vern SUMMERS, et al., Respondents, and Sue Summers, Appellant, v. Mary FIETEK, et al., Defendants.

No. ED 105401

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: April 3, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 7, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Mark R. Bahn, 5024 Griffin Road, St. Louis, MO 63128.

FOR RESPONDENT: Colleen C. Jones, 12 West Lincoln Street, Belleville, IL 62220.

FOR DEFENDANTS: Lauren A. Lageson, 2708 Olive Street, St. Louis, MO 63103.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

*744*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Sue Summers ("Appellant") appeals the judgment denying her motion to set aside a judgment approving a wrongful death settlement arising out of a motor vehicle accident involving Walter Summers and underlying defendant Mary Fietek ("Ms. Fietek").1 In the underlying action, Appellant and Respondents Vern Summers, Carlanna Piquard, Carole Summers, and Margaret Mitchell each consented to a settlement with Ms. Fietek and to the apportionment of settlement proceeds. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

Richard Fietek and Mr. Tree Service were also underlying defendants, but any claims Appellant may have had against those parties are not at issue in this appeal.
EPA Reg. No. 55206-4 

Vol. 1
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,303]


Hospira, Inc.; Morgan Hill, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Hospira, Inc., Morgan Hill, California.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5914 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[No. 30251-9-II.

Division Two.

May 18, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John O. Petre, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 02-1-01385-6, Roger A. Bennett, J., entered April 28, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Cox, J., and Seinfeld, J. Pro Tern.
ex10_33.htm








Exhibit 10.33


 


12/31/2009


 


Bob Feller


Chief Financial Officer


Scientific Learning Corporation


300 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza


Suite 600


Oakland, CA 94612








	
RE:

	
Scientific Learning Corporation (“Borrower”)







7050578391 / 34/42/59/67/75


 


Dear Bob:







Comerica Bank (the “Bank”) has approved the extension of the maturity date of the above referenced credit facility as evidenced by that certain note/agreement, dated January 15, 2004 (as such may be amended, restated, modified, supplemented or revised from time to time, the “Agreement”) from December 31, 2009 to March 15, 2010.  Upon your execution of a counterpart of this letter, the maturity date shall be so amended.


 


The Agreement, as modified and amended hereby, shall be and remain in full force and effect in accordance with its respective terms and hereby is ratified and confirmed in all respects.  Except as expressly set forth herein, the execution, delivery, and performance of this modification and amendment shall not operate as a waiver of, or as an amendment of, any right, power, or remedy of Bank under the Agreement, as in effect prior to the date hereof.  Borrower ratifies and reaffirms the continuing effectiveness of all promissory notes, guaranties, security agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust, environmental agreements, and all other instruments, documents and agreements entered into in connection with the Agreement.


 


By execution of a counterpart of this letter, Borrower further represents and warrants that the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement are true and correct as of the date hereof, and that no event of default has occurred and is continuing under the Agreement or any other document, instrument or agreement entered into in connection therewith.


 


Sincerely,


Comerica Bank








	
By:

	
/s/ Robert Hernandez


	  	
Robert Hernandez


	  	
Vice President


	  	  
	
Acknowledged and accepted on 12/31/09:


	 
	
Scientific Learning Corporation


	  	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Robert E. Feller


	  	
Bob Feller


	  	
Chief Financial Officer
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06
- 19
- 00219
- CR JOHNNY RAY CONLEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 8th District Court Delta County, Texas Trial Court No. 7663
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Johnny Ray Conley appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child. 1 Conley was tried on four indictments in one trial; each indictment alleged a distinct commission of aggravated sexual assault upon the same child, on a different date. Conley claims his convictions subjected him to double jeopardy. We address ed that claim in our opinion in cause number 06
- 19
- 00217
- CR , issued on even date herewith. For the reasons explained in our opinion in that cause , we overrule Conley’s point of error in this case. The trial court’s judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Scott E. Stevens Justice Date Submitted: April 1, 2020 Date Decided: April 2 , 2020 Do Not Publish

1 See T EX . P ENAL C OD E A NN . § 22.021. W e also affirm Conley ’ s other convictions in cause numbers 06
- 19
- 00217
- CR , 06
- 19
- 00 218
- C R , and 06
- 19
- 00 220
- CR . Conley was sentenced to seventy
- five years ’ incarceration i n each case. The trial court order ed the sentences for cause numbers 06
- 19
- 00 217
- CR , 06
- 19
- 00 218
- CR , and 06
- 19
- 00 219
- CR to run concurrently and the sentence for 06
- 19
- 00 220
- CR to run consecutively .
EXHIBIT 32.2

                              CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
his knowledge, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

/s/ Leon Nowalsky
------------------------------
Leon Nowalsky
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  August 19, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|Exhibit
  32.1
|--------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
      906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
  2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
Chief Executive Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on
his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the
      results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                              
|   



|Date: May 10,
2006
|------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive
      Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION
         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Ridgefield Industries Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Qian Chao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: July 26, 2004

/s/ Qian Chao
----------------------------------
Qian Chao, Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer and principal
 accounting officer)
In the INTEREST OF: T.J.-A.

Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. T.A., Appellant.

WD 81749

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: March 26, 2019

Edward E. Moore, Kansas City, for Respondent.

Mitchell J. Widener, Co-counsel for Respondent.

Tracey T. Chappell, for Appellant.

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge *632***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

T.A. appeals the trial court's judgment terminating his parental rights to his minor child, T.J.-A. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate:  January 20, 2005This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit
32.2
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Garman Cabinet & Millwork, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
April 13,
2010                                                                      By: /s/ Sidney
Garman
 Sidney
Garman
 Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,542] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on November 26, 2008 in response to a petition filed by workers at Mannatech, Inc., Coppell, Texas. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-64,511) filed on November 21, 2008 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of December 2008. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-643 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 4.21.5


 


APPENDIX
NO. 4


 


to Agency
Agreement


 


No. 36-06-23 dt.              2006


 


List of Associated Operators


 


	
  Ref

  No.

  	
   

  	
  Operator’s full

  name

  	
   

  	
  Operator’s trade

  name

  	
   

  	
  License

  number

  	
   

  	
  Legal address

  	
   

  	
  Physical 

  address

  
	
  1.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  2.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  3.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


 


	
  OAO Rostelecom:

  	
   

  	
  Operator:

  
	
  General Director

  	
   

  	
  General Director

  
	
  OAO Rostelecom

  	
   

  	
  OJSC VolgaTelecom

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
                              
  D.Ye. Yerokhin

  	
   

  	
                              
  S.V. OMELCHENKO

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
                              
  2006

  	
   

  	
                                  2006

  
	
  Seal here

  	
   

  	
  Seal here

  



 


154
Exhibit 32.1



AMENDED CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Goldland Holdings Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:



1.     The Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2013(the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.     The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Pierre Quilliam



Pierre Quilliam,

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)



Date:  December 4, 2014
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of**

**the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

        Pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of DividendCapital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certifywith respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) that:

 

(1)                      the Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                      the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Date: November 12, 2003 |   | */s/*Evan H. Zucker        |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                    |   | Evan H. Zucker             |
|                    |   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |
|                    |   |                       |
| Date: November 12, 2003 |   | */s/*James R.  Mulvihill   |
|                    |   | James R. Mulvihill         |
|                    |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |
|                    |   |                       |

 

 

----