T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R I GO B E R T O MAR T I NE Z MUR I L L O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 73075 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 448- 387 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B e f o r e : R Y M E R , M c K E O W N , an dP A E Z , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R i gobe rt o M art i ne z M ur i l l o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order s um m ar i l y a ff i rm i ng hi s app ea l fr o m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s ( “IJ” ) d ec isio nd en yin g M ar ti n ez M u rill o ’s 

# FI LED APR13 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 73075 2 ap p l i cat i o n fo r can cel l at i o n o f rem o v al . O u r j u ri sd i ct i o n i s g o v ern edb y 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o le g a l an dc o n s titu tio n a l q u e s tio n s r a is e din im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 40 0 F . 3d 78 5, 79 1-92 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) . We d e n yi n p artan dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e a gr e e w i th the I J ’ s c onc l us i on tha tM art i ne z M ur i l l o’ s gi r l f r i e nd’ s s on d o es n o tm eetth e st atu t o ry d efi n i t i o n o f “ ch i l d ” an dth erefo re can n o tserv e as a q u a lif y in g r e la tiv e f

o rh is c an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l ap p lic a tio n . See 8 U . S. C. § 1 1 0 1 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( B ) ; s e e a l

s o Co n tr e ra s - Bu e n

f i l v . I NS , 71 2 F . 2d 40 1, 40 3 (9th C i r. 19 83 ) ( per c uri am ) ( “ the A ct ’ s def i ni t i on of ‘ chi l d’ i ncl ud es on l y s t epchi l dren w hos e s t a tus a s s uc h w a s c r e a t e d bym arr i a ge ” ) . M art i ne z M ur i l l o c annot d e m o n s tr a te an ye rr o r , s o h is du e p r o c e s s c la im f a ils . Se e La ta v . I

NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng e rr orand s ubs t ant i a l pr e j udi c e t o pr e va i l on a du e p r o c e s s c h a lle n g e ) . W e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w M artin e z M u r illo ’s c o n te n tio n th a t h is gi rl fr i end’ s s on i s hi s de f ac t o chi l d, or thatthe son h as been l egi t i m at ed un der s t a tu t e , b e c au s e Ma rt i n e z Mu r i l l o f a i l e dt o r a i s e th e s e i s s u e s b e f o r e th e B I A06- 73075 3 an dth e r e b yf

a ile dto e x h au s t h is a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( thi s c ou rtl ac ks j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew cont ent i on s notra i se d b ef ore the agency) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.