alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification**
I, Leslye Grindle, C.F.O., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SouthernCommunity Bancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared; b. [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986] c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 12, 2004      /s/ Leslye Grindle  Leslye Grindle, Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of Child Support Enforcement

# AGENCY:

Office of Child Support Enforcement, ACF, DHHS.

# ACTION:

Notice to award Non-Competitive Successor Award to the State Information Technology Consortium (SITC).

*CFDA#:*                     93.601.                

*Legislative Authority:*                     Legislative Authority: Section 452(j) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 652(j), provides Federal funds for information dissemination and technical assistance to States, training of Federal and State staff to improve CSE programs, and research, demonstration, and special projects of regional or national significance relating to the operation of State child support enforcement programs.                

*Amount of Award:*                     $124,474.                

*Project Period:*                     07/1/2008-06/30/2011.                

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces that the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE), will award a Non-Competitive Successor Award to the State Information Technology Consortium (SITC) in Raleigh, North Carolina. The award will enable the SITC to educate judges on effective problem-solving court strategies to deal with parents who do not make their child support payments.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*Contact for Further Information:*                         Larry R. Holtz, Program Specialist, Division of State, Tribal and Local Assistance, Office of Child Support Enforcement, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447. Telephone: 202-401-5376. E-mail:                         *Larry.Holtz@acf.hhs.gov*.                    

Dated: March 16, 2009.

Donna J. Bonar,

Acting Commissioner, Office of Child Support Enforcement.

[FR Doc. E9-6119 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
N. Adams, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.


                                        /s/ Thomas N. Adams
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Thomas N. Adams
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        August 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,243]


TMD Friction, Inc., Dublin, VA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 13, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of TMD 
Friction, Inc., Dublin, Virginia.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6300 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Order entered December 19, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00665-CV

UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellant

V.

PAMELA EVANS, PATRICE ANDERSON, AS NEXT FRIEND OF PARIS DAVIS, & 

LEATHA KATAVI JONES, AS NEXT FRIEND OF DOMINIC JONES, Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-04449

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ second unopposed motion to extend time to file brief. We 

GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed on or before January 15, 2019.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Brian J. Roney, certify that:     1. I have reviewed the quarterly for the period ended September 30, 2007 report on Form 10-Qof North Pointe Holdings Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Intentionally omitted;     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated:November 13, 2007     /s/ Brian J. Roney     Brian J. Roney  Chief Financial Officer
42
EX-35.1
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES

Depositor:       Structured Asset Securities Corporation
                 Attention: Contract Finance LMT 2008-6
                 745 Seventh Avenue, 13th Floor
                 New York, New York 10019

Master Servicer: Aurora Loan Services LLC
                 Michele Olds
                 10350 Park Meadows Drive
                 Littleton, CO 80124


Trustee:         Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                 Attention: Kimberly J. Wiggins / LMT 2008-6
                 9062 Old Annapolis Road
                 Columbia, MD 21045


Subject:         Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:     2008
Investor Code:   J49
Investor Name:   LMT 2008-6



I, Thomas L. Wind, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan
Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year
2008:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer for the calendar year ended
December 31, 2008 (the reporting period) and of its performance under the
Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout
such reporting period.



Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC

By      /s/ Thomas L. Wind
Name:   Thomas L. Wind
Title:  Managing Director
In the INTEREST OF: D.R.C.

No. ED 106110

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, NORTHERN DIVISION.

Filed: January 22, 2019

Laurie A. Dodd, Bradley C. Hill, 332B Jungermann Rd., St. Peters, MO 63376, For Petitioner/Respondent.

Casey J. Welch, P.O. Box 962, Hannibal, MO 63401, For Intervenor/Appellant.

Meredith M. Illa, 406 S. Dickerson St., P.O. Box 488, Palmyra, MO 63461, Guardian Ad Litem.

Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*266***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

R.C. appeals the circuit court's judgment appointing J.C. as D.R.C.'s guardian after both of D.R.C.'s parents died. Finding that the circuit court's judgment was not unsupported by substantial evidence, against the weight of the evidence, or an erroneous declaration or application of the law, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
J-A34032-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellant

v.

STEPHANIE J. SALTER

Appellee

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

: PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 653 MDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered March 17, 2014,

In the Court of Common Pleas of York County, 

Criminal Division, at No. CP-67-CR-0008129-2013.

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., SHOGAN, J., and STABILE, J.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY SHOGAN, J.:

I respectfully disagree that the police officer had probable cause to 

conduct the traffic stop due to his distance of seventy-five feet from 

Appellee’s vehicle at the time he became suspicious that her license plate 

lamps were not functioning. The traffic regulation in question requires only 

that the lights “make the registration plate visible from distance of 50 feet to 

the rear of the vehicle.” 67 Pa. Code § 175.66(k). However, because I 

conclude that the officer had reasonable suspicion to believe that the license 

plate lamps were not functioning properly, the traffic stop was proper, and 

because I conclude that the officer had probable cause to arrest Appellee for 

DUI, I concur in the result reached by the Majority.
IR SPECTRA

 SANITIZED
EXHIBIT 23.1

                               Stan J.H. Lee, CPA
              2160 North Central Rd Suite 203 * Fort Lee * NJ 07024
                   P.O. Box 436402 * San Ysidro* CA 92143-9402
               619-623-7799 * Fax 619-564-3408 * stan2u@gmail.com
________________________________________________________________________________

To Whom It May Concerns:

The firm of Stan J.H. Lee, Certified Public Accountants, consents to the
inclusion of our report of March 9, 2009, on the audited financial statements of
Apollo Entertainment Group Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and for the period then
ended in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Stan J.H. Lee, CPA
----------------------
Stan J.H. Lee, CPA

March 9, 2009
Fort Lee, New Jersey

          REGISTERED WITH THE PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD
          MEMBER OF NEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10303

Summary Calendar

MICHAEL ANTHONY DAVIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

KAREN L. COLLINS;TERRI L. LASSITER; CHRISEWOLFE, Assistant United

States Attorney; MICHAEL J. WORLEY, Assistant United States Attorney,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CV-92

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We construe the filing by Michael Anthony Davis, federal prisoner

# 33896-177, as a petition for panel rehearing. The petition is GRANTED, our

prior opinion is WITHDRAWN, and this opinion is SUBSTITUTED therefor.

Davis was convicted in 2005 of conspiring to possess and distribute cocaine

base and distributing cocaine base and was sentenced to 360 months of

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 19, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-10303 Document: 00512090104 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2012
No. 12-10303

imprisonment. In February 2012, Davis filed a complaint under Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971),

seeking damages and challenging alleged errors that occurred at trial and

sentencing. The district court denied relief but granted Davis leave to proceed

in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. 

Davis’s protestations to certain qualifying dismissals (strikes) under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g) identified in our prior opinion, although correctly attributable

to another prisoner named Michael Anthony Davis, do not provide grounds for

the relief he seeks. Davis has in fact accumulated three strikes. On at least

three prior occasions while incarcerated, Davis brought a civil action or appeal

in a court of the United States that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. § 1915(g); see Davis

v. United States, 4:11-cv-00064-Y (N.D. Tex. July 6, 2011) (unpublished); Davis

v. United States, 5:10-cv-01136-HE, 2011 WL 693639 at *1 (W.D. Okla. Feb. 18,

2011) (unpublished); and Davis v. United States, 426 F. App’x 648, No. 11-6072,

2011 WL 2321453 at *1 (10th Cir. June 14, 2011). Further, Davis has not

alleged, nor does the record reflect, that he is “under imminent danger of serious

physical injury.” § 1915(g).

Accordingly, Davis’s IFP status is decertified, and the appeal is dismissed. 

Davis has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee

to the clerk of the district court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal. 

REHEARING GRANTED; PREVIOUS OPINION WITHDRAWN; IFP

DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

2

 Case: 12-10303 Document: 00512090104 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2012
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

***Propos ed Site*** March 2015 

### MAIN STREET GROUND Burnet, Texas WATER PLUME Burnet County

 **Site Location :**  The Main Street Ground Water Plume site is located between County Road 340 and County Road 340 A in Burnet County, Texas, approximately one mile south of the city limits of Burnet.

 **Site History:** The Main Street Ground Water Plume consists of a tetrachloroethylene (PCE)

- contaminated ground water plume originating from an unknown source that released into the Ellenburger

- San Saba Aquifer. Site contamination was identified through monitoring of the Bertram Public Water Supply in 2010 by the Texas C ommission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:**
PCE is contaminating nine gr ound water wells, including two public supply wells and seven private water wells

. Currently PCE contamination levels in drinking water wells are below the EPA Clean Water Act’s maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)

. Two wells exceeding MCLs are used for irrigation and livestock watering.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment :**  The two contaminated public drinking water supply wells and the seven contaminated private drinking water wells

serve more than 1100 residents. No filtration systems are in place on the contaminated wells. The private drinking water wells in the contaminated aquifer are the only source of water for resid ents who live outside the city limits of
Burnet.

 **Response Activities (to date):** No response actions have taken place.

 **Need for NPL Listing:**
The s tate of Texas referred th e site to the EPA because without identification and investigation of the source of ground water contamination and remediation of the contaminated ground water plume

, additional public and private wells may be threatened

. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated but are not viable at this time. The EPA received a l etter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the s tate

.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ( ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 
 
 **Certification
        of Chief Financial Officer of ULURU Inc.**
 **Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**
 **to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of ULURU Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
        “Report”), the undersigned officer of ULURU Inc. does hereby certify, pursuant
        to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
        (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1.)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2.)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
                  May 22, 2006
              
              /s/
                  Terrance K. WallbergTerrance
                  K. WallbergVice
                  President and Chief Financial Officer