;

### RBLC Search Results I

### RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse IClean 

### Air Technology 

### Cen... page 

### I of 3

=&showAllRecords- No&cFID=6826586&CFToKEN =28045652&ìse ssipg¡i{ rÞöåR:Ü]gñ}ìf¿êSeåfffiÞf/êñ.ßd.6Ê2tr?f r\t*}æ 

# ¡ Technology 

### Transfer Network clean Âir Technology 

## center 

## - RACT/BACT/LAER 

### clearinghouse

You are here: EPA Home Air & Radiation TTNWeb - Technology Transfer Network Clean A¡r Technologv Center RACT/BACT/LAER Clear¡nohouse RBLC BasicSearch RBLC Advanced Search RBLC Search Results


## RBLC 

# Search Results

Your search hasfound 25 facilities and 56 processes that match your search criteria. You canview details for one or m.ore facilities by clicking -or¡the highlighted RBLC identifier orthe process description inthe list 

### below-To - çreqte a report, select one of the standard output formats from the 

### liit of repots atthe bottom of this oaqe. Onlv facilities that are checked in the table below will be included in your reþorl ðlick onthe cflect< Oox në"t-to'ãÅv '

### ' facility to switch between checked and unchecked or use the "Check" or "Un-Check" all facilities Outtonsátlfrä top ofthe llst to check or uncheck all records in the list. 

### Matching Facilities 

### for Search 

### Criteria: Portion of Database: Draft Determinations And RBLC Permits issued during or after January, 1999 And process contains CEMENT


### rene"kl

## f unçliecr<l 

### ALL 

### Facitlies

LON ESTAR INDUSTRIES INC LONESTAR INDUSTRIES MARYNEWAL CEMENT PLANT AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES SLOAN QUARRY

ENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.C. NTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, PROCESS DESCRIPTION

90.006 CEMENT MANUFACTURING

90,012 AGGREGAI-E/CEMENT MIXING
90.O24 AGGREGATE/CEMENT PRODUCTS BAGGINGAND PACKING 90,028 PORTLAND CEMENT KILN

90.006 CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL KILN

90.028 CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM

90.028 CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM

90.028 POPRTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING 90.028 BUCKET ELEVATOR FEED - CEMENT SILO
90.028 AIRSLIDES & SILOS - CEMENT SILO 90.028 CEMENT KILN SYSTEM. #5 90,028 CEMENT BAGGING #1 NOïÊ: Draft determinations are marked with a "

### * " beside the RBL

coRPoRATE/COMPANY & CODE PERMIT NUMBER

82775 04/L0/2009

372 t2/tL/2006

072006-003 07/ru2006

R14-0028 04/2612006

PSD-FL-361 02/LO/2006

PSD-FL-358 (1 190041-00 1-AC) 02/07/2006 '1630-00025 08/20/2004

17-0 1-005 L2/7t/2003

vA-20232 06/73/2003 28,1101-PSD 04/t0/2003 TE

ttwv-0024

ul'FL-0282

ivl FL-0281



### g MS-0071

ia IA-0070 GREENBRIER COTION, LLC ERN GREENBRIER COERATION, LLC RICAN CEMENT COMPANY,

CEMENT COMPANY cEMENT COMPANY, LLC R/CENTER HILL CEMENT T

IM (US), INC, GH CEMENT COMPANY GH CEMENT COMPANY

- CITY PLANT



### http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblclcfmhbcrtres.cfm?RequestTimeout:500&dateRange:D,F>&Ele... 

### IIl24l200gi 

### RBLC Search Results I

### RACTiBACT/LAER Clearinghouse IClean

### Air Technology 

### Cen... Page 3

### of 3

90.019 CEMENT MANUFACTURING, SECONDARY CRUSHER ' 90,028 CEMENT MANUFACTURING, BALL MILL TRANSFER EQUIPM ENT 99.120 CEMENT MANUFACTURING. FLY ASH



### vtlx-0279 NORTH TEXAS

NORTH TEXAS PSD-TX-893 03/04/1999



# f-ñn I un-cñeck

## ] ALL 

### Facitities

Select a ReooÉ Format Formatting y.our report may take awhile, especially if your facility has a large number of processes and pollutants, The detail reports take the longest amount of time because they include the most information. please be patient after you select "Create repoft"

, f)S¡row All Records 8)Show Only Selected Records On This page Free Form Repoft(Customizable Fields Selection,as Sorted in ResultsTable) .1, 90,028 CEMENT LOADOUT NO. 1AND NO. 2 90.028 CEMENT SILO FEED BIN #S. 1. 2. 3, 4

Create SILOS 90,028 CEMENT MFG.. FINISH MILL 

### -**-\'\- TRAt\isFER. I\lo.3 OY gò\OZE CEMENT SILO NO.1 CEMENT COMPANY 90ì028 CEMENT 

### COMPANY

### \

-

90.028 CEMENT SILO NO, 2 

### pgóze cH"tzur 

### SIlo No. 

### ¡

http:llcfpttb.epa.govhblc/cfm/rbcrtres.cfm?RequestTimeout:500&dateRange:D,F>&Ele... 

### IIl24l200g

### Please

### select the

### fields that vor¡ 

### war¡t 

### to displav in

### the report.

Facilities Pollutants Affected Boundaries

Process Type ÞiÞrimary Fuel Throughput Throughput í-jrirnlt (class 1Area or ofthe border ofthe

flBoundary Type (Class 1 or ntl Border)
l-J Distatrce (kilometers) X Class I Area State RBLCID Facility Name



### n Facility County Facility State plFacilitr ZipCode 

### I lFacility Counhy Facility Contact Name 

### f, Facility Contact Phone Þ$acility Contact Email
l---lEPa Region f-l Asencv Code AgencyName .E(Agen.y Contact llAgency Phone

L-ì Ottt.t Agency Contact lnfo IPermitNumber 

# I sIc


### I Facility Registry System

l---ì Application Accepted Received Date ftPermit Issuance Date 

### Xout. determination


### I Dut" determination last

f,Facility Description 

### Kòtn., Permitting f-l Facility-wide Emissions Increase 

### n Test Method L_-ìcas Number 

## ft Control Method Code Control Method Description j SEmission Limit 1 ffiEmissionLimit I Unit þ{Emission Limit I Avg.

[JEmission Limit2
fiEmission Limit 2 Unit {Emission Limit 2Avg.


### f l Stan¿ar¿ Emission Limit 

### n Standard E*ission Limit


### E Standard Limit Avg.

fJ Case-by-Case Basis f-l oth.r Applicable

Other Factors?

Estim ated Ef flrciency

### (þ E Compliance Verified

L-l Cost Effectiveness 

### ! Incremental Cost

E CostVerified By Agency
[---]lotl* Year Used In Cost
E Po llutants/Compliance Format 

### RBLC Report Page 1

### of 1

hltp.,llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptFreeForm_Mid.cfm?RequestTimeout:5O0&CFID:.



# .. I112412009Format 

### RBLC Report

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " besidethe RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: j.1-/25/2009 Page 1

### of229



### Control Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)



### Facility Information: LONESTAR INDUSTRIES 

### MARYNEWAL CEMENT PLANT

RBLC 

### ID: *Corporate/Company
Name: 

### xFacility Name: 

### Facility State: 

### Facility 

### ZIP Code: 

### Facility Contact Name: 

### Facility Contact Phone: 

### Facility Contact Email: Agency Name: Agency Contact: Agency Phone: Agency Email: 

### NAICS: Permit Issuance Date: Date determination last updated: Permit Type: 

### Facility Description:

Other Permitting Information: *TX-O543 

### LONESTAR INDUSTRIES INC

LONESTAR INDUSTRIES 

### MAR\î{EV/AL CEMENT PLANT 

### TX 7953s 

### MR ROD SIMMONS 6108825020



### TEXAS COMMISSION ON 

### ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ) 

### RANDY HAMILTON 

### (srz)239-tsr2 RHAMILTO (E,TCEQ. STATE. TX. U S 327310 0411012009 ACT rU0612009



### A: NEV//GREENFIELD 

### FACILITY LONE STAR/BUZZI PROPOSES

### A NEV/ DRY PROCESS 

### PORTLAND CEMENT 

### KILN AND RELATED NEW 

### MATERIAL PROCESSING 

### FACILITIES TO REPLACE THREE OLDER, 

### LONG-DRY PROCESS CEMENT 

### KILNS AND MATERIAL PROCESSING 

### FACILITIES 

### AT THEIR 

### MAR\î{EAL PLANT. THE 

### ANNUAL PRODUCTION CAPACITY OFTHE PROPOSED 

### NEW 

### KILN LINE IS 1.1 

### MILLION SHORT TONS PER

### YEAR (STPY) OF 

### CLINKER. THE THREE 

### EXISTING KILNS, 

### WITH AN 

### ANNUAL CAPACITY PRODUCTION OF 0.6

### MILLION STPY OF 

### CLINKER 

### V/ILL BE 

### PERMANENTLY SHUT 

### DOWN AFTER THE 

### NEW 

### KILN HAS COMPLETED ITS STARTUP 

### AND 

### INITIAL SHAKEDOWN. BECAUSE OF 

### THE SHUTDOWN OF THE 

### OLD 

### KILNS, THERE 

### V/ILL BE CONTEMPORANEOUS REDUCTIONS. 

### THE 

### ONLY CONTAMINANT WITH 

### A SIGNIFICANT NET INCREASE 

### AND THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PSD 

### PERMIT REVIEW IS 

### PARTICULATE MATTER (PM), 

### INCLUDING PM 

### WITH 

### AN AVERAGE DIAMETER EQUAL TO OR LESS 

### THAN 10 MTCRONS 

### (pM10).THE STATE PERMTT REVTEW REQUIRES 

### BACT, RESULTING 

### IN SELECTIVE 

### NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTTON (SNCR) FOR NTTROGEN OXTDES 

### O{OX) FROM THE 

### KILN. THE 

### CALCIUM IN THE 

### RAV/ 

### MEAL 

### WILL ABSORB 

### MUCH OF THE 

### PYRITIC SULFUR 

### IN THE 

### LIMESTONE 

### AND FUEL SULFUR, 

### MAINTAINING RELATIVELY LOW

### ANNUAL SULFUR 

### DIOXIDE (SO2) EMISSIONS. 

### PSDTXl 

### lOl

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



# . Page2

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONESTAR INDUSTRIES 

### MARYNEV/AL CEMENT PLANT

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING *Process

# Type: 90.006 Primary 

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 155.00 Throughput

# Unit: SHORT 

### T/D Process

# Notes: THE PROPOSED 

### NEW CEMENT 

### KILN IS

### A SINGLE 

### KILN (APPLICATION BASED ON

### A POLYSIUS DESIGN) 

### WITH 

### A PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF 155 SHORT TONS PER 

### DAY AND 1.1 

### MILLION SHORT TONS OF 

### CLINKER PER 

### YEAR (90% 

### ANNUAL CAPACITY FACTOR). THE PROPOSED 

### NEV/ 

### KILN V/ILL BE

### A MODERN, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER DESIGN 

### CHARACTERIZED 

### BY HIGH 

### THERMAL EFFICIENCY, COMPARED TO OLDER SYSTEMS SUCH AS THE 

### EXISTING LONG-DRY KILNS. 

### INADDITION TO 

### REPLACEMENT OFTHE THREE 

### EXISTING KILNS, THE 

### EXISTING RAW 

### MATEzuAL PREPARATION SYSTEMS 

### WILL BE REPLACED, AS 

### \MLL THE 

### FINISHING EQUIPMENT USED TO TRANSFORM 

### THE CLINKER INTO PORTLAND CEMENT.THE ONLY EXISTING EQUIPMENT TO BE 

### RETAINED CONSISTS OF: THE 

### COAL 

### RAILCAR UNLOADING EQUIPMENT, COAL SCREEN, 

### COAL STORAGE SILOS, 

### FINISHED CEMENT STORAGE SILOS, ONE 

### TRUCK LOADOUT FOR 

### FINISHED CEMENT, 

### AND MACHINES FOR 

### BAGGING FINISHED CEMENT. PROPOSED 

### ABATEMENT FORTHE 

### KILN EXHAUST EMISSIONS 

### INCLUDES 

### A BAGHOUSE FOR CONTROL OF 

### PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) 

### AND PARTICULATE MATTER BELOW 10

### MrcRoNS (PM10), 

### AND SELECTIVE 

### NON-CATALYTTC REDUCTTON (SNCR) FOR NTTROGEN OXTDES 

### (NOX) CONTROL. 

### THE PROPOSED FUELS FOR THE 

### NEW 

### KILN ARE THE SAME AS 

### CURRENTLY AUTHORIZED FOR THE 

### EXISTING 

### KILNS: COAL, PETROLEUM COKE, TIRES, 

### NATURAL GAS,

### AND VARIOUS OTHER 

### ALTERNATIVE NON-HAZARDOUS FUELS.

Pollutant Information: 

### LONESTAR INDUSTRIES 

### MARYNEWAL CEMENT PLANT - 

### CEMENT 

### MANUFACTURING

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method LOW-NOX 

### MAIN KILN BURNER, 

### LOW-NOX,PRECALCINER 

### AND 

# Description: SNCR. THE PROPOSED EMISSION 

### LIMIT IS 1.95 

### LB 

### NO)ITON CLINKER PRODUCED, 3O-DAY 

### ROLLING AVERAGE. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 1.9500 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB 

### NO)IT CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: 

# ' Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### N

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### *PollutantName Page 3

### of229

Carbon Monoxide

THE PROPOSED EMISSION 

### LIMIT OF 2.0 

### LB CO/TON 

### CLINKER, 12- 

### MONTH ROLLING AVERAGE, IS 

### BASED ON 

### RAW 

### MATERIAL PROPERTIES 

### AND CURRENT 

### KILN SYSTEM DESIGN. 2.0000 

### LB CO/T 

### CLINKER

1

### 2-MONTH ROLLING AVERAGE *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control Method Description:

Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### N pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method THE PROPOSED EMISSION 

### LIMIT OF 0.10 

### LB VOC/TON CLINKER IS 

# Description: BASED ON 

### RAW 

### MATERIAL PROPERTIES 

### AND CURRENT 

### KILN SYSTEM DESIGN. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB VOC/T CLINKERKE Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### N pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:


### tPollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method THE 

### MAIN KILN BAGHOUSE IS 

### DESIGNED TO MEET 

### AN EMISSION 

# Description: LIMIT OF 0.007 GR/DSCF, 

### FILTER CATCH. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0070 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg.



### http://cfoub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air N 

### pollution technology 

## ' considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 4

### of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: tt/zS/ZOOg Control- Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)



### Facility Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### t.L.C.

RBLC 

### ID: MO-0012 

### *Corporate/Company CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. Name: 

### *Facility 

# Name: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. Facility

# State: MO Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 63401 

### Facility 

### ContactName: JERRY EPPERSON 

### Facility 

### ContactPhone: 5132216262 

### Facility Contact Email: Agency

# Name: MISSOURI DNR, 

### AIR POLL CONTROL 

### PROGRAM Agency

# Contact: MS. 

### KYRA MOORE Agency

# Phone: (573) 526-3835 Agency

# Email: KYRA.MOORE@DNR.MO.GOV NAICS: 2381 10 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0711112006 ACT Date 

### determinationlast 0411812008 updated: Permit

# Type: B: 

### ADD NEV/ PROCESS TO 

### EXISTING 

### FACILITY Facility 

## Description: INSTALLATION OF

### A 3,300 

### TON OF 

### CLINKER PER 

### DAY PREHEATER 

### AND/OR PRECALCINER 

### PORTLAND CEMENT 

### KILN. UNDERGROUND LIMESTONE MINE, 

### AND ASSOCIATED PROCESSES. 

### REMOVAL OF THE 

### EXISTING 

### KILN (KP-01) AS PART OFTHIS PROJECT ACCOUNTS FOR 

### NOX EMISSIONS DECREASING. 

### BASED ON 

### NETTING ANALYSIS, NOX YIELDED 

### A DECREASE 

### IN EMISSIONS OF 492.62 TONS PER

### YEAR. Other Permitting Information:



### Facility-wide Emissions :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.
*Pollutant 

# Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 2168.6200 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

# Name: Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 1629.5800 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

# Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 496.3100 (Tons/Year)



### hfiB:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 1162.3500 (TonsiYear) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 725900 (Tons/Year) Increase: Page 5

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.

*Process 

# Name: PORTLAND CEMENT 

### KILN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: INSTALL OF

### A 3,300 

### TON OF 

### CLIKER PER 

### DAY PREHEATER 

### AND/OR PRECALCINER PORTLAND CEMENT 

### KILN.

Pollutant Information: 

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. - 

### PORTLAND CEMENT 

### KILN

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSES 

### HAVE BEEN SELECTED AS 

### BACT FOR 

### EACH POINT 

# Description: SOURCE OF PM10 EMISSIONS 

### THAT IS 

### NEW OR 

### MODIFIED Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5160 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. CLINK 3-HOUR 

### AVERAGING 

### TIME Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air

### Y pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContToI

# Method INHERENT RAV/ 

### MILL SCRUBBING IS CONSIDERED TO BE 

### BACT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 1.9300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIT Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. CLINK 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 265.3800 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBIT Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE



### http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air U 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 6

### of229

*Pollutant

# Name Volatile Organic Compôunds 

### (VOC) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method THE 

### NEW PH/PC 

### KILN SYSTEM 

### AND THE 

### COAL 

### MILL PREHEATER 

# Description: WILL UTILIZE GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES FOR 

### BACT. Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.1200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIT Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. CLINK Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U



# . pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContToI

# Method THE 

### NEW PH/PC 

### KILN SYSTEM 

### AND THE 

### COAL 

### MILL PREHEATER 

# Description: WILLUTILIZE GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES FOR 

### BACT. Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 3.6000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LBIT Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. CLINK Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * 

### " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: aa/25/2009 control- Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information : WE STERN GREENB RIER CO -GENERATI ON, LL C


### RBLC

# ID: WV-0024 

### *Corporate/Cgmpany V/ESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION,LLC Name: 

### *Facility

# Name: WESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION,LLC

http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report PageT 

### of229

Facility

# State: WV Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 25962 

### Facility Contact

## Name: BRIAN 

### NEELY Facility 

### ContactPhone: 3044388000 

### Facility Contact 

## Email: BNEELY@WVCOGEN.COM Agency

# Name: WEST 

### VIRGINIA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL COMM Agency

# Contact: MR. JOE KESSLER Agency 

# Phone: (304)926-3727 Agency 

# Email: jkessler@mail.dep.state.wv.us 

# NAICS: 221112 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0412612006 ACT Date determination

# last 0911512006 updated: Permit

# Type: ,{: NEWGREENFIELD 

### FACILITY Facility 

## Description: NOMINAL 98 

### NET MEGAV/ATT WASTE COAL-FIRED STEAM ELECTRIC CO-GENERATION 

### FACILITY. BOILER IS CFB 

### TECHNOLOGY. 

### FACILITY INCLUDES 

### KILN TO PRODUCE



# . CEMENTITIOUS 

### MATERIAL FROM 

### ASH GENERATED 

### IN BOILER. Other

# Permitting CURRENTLY I-INDER 

### APPEAL Information:

Affected Boundarie s :WE S

### TERN GREENBRIER C O- 

### GENERATION, 

### LLC
*Limit (Class 

### I Area

# or Dolly Sods Name of the border of the U.S.): Boundary Type (Class 

## 1 CLASSl

or 

### Intl Border): Distance:

169.00 164.00 Class 1Area

# State: WV 

### *Limit (Class 

### I Area

# or James River Face Name of the border of the U.S.): Boundary Type (Class 

## 1 CLASS1
or 

### Intl Border): Distance: 120.00 Class 1Area

# State: VA *Limit (Class 

### I Area

# or Otter Creek Name of the border of the U.S.): Boundary Type (Class

# I CLASSl

or 

### Intl Border): Distance: 143.00 Class 1Area

## State: WV 

### *Limit (Class 

## I Area

## or Shenandoah NP Name of the border of the U.S.): Boundary Type (Class 

## 1 CLASSl
or 

### Intl Border): Distance:



### http:llcþub.epa,gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Class 1Area

## State: VA Page 8

### of229

Facility-wide Emissions :WESTERN GREENBzuER CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC

*Pollutant 

## Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 926.0600 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) 

### Facilþ-wide Emissions 529.4300 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 153.7900 (TonsiYear) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 631.8400 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 28.5400 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information :V/ESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: CIRCULATING 

### FLUIDIZED BED BOILER (CFB) *Process

# Type: 11.110 Primary

# Fuel: WASTE 

### COAL 

# Throughput: 1070.00 Throughput

# Unit: mmbtu/h
PTOCess 

# Notes: NOMINAL 1,070 

### MMBTU V/ASTE-COAL FIRED CFB. 

### MAXIMUM COAL THROUGHPUT 

### AT WORST-CASE 

### FUEL SCENARIO 

### IS 157 TPH. 

### ANNUAL HEAT INPUT SHALL NOT EXCEED 8,908,920 

### MMBTU. SULFUR 

### AND ASH CONTENTS 

### SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.47% 

### AND
63 .7 lYo, RESPECTIVELY.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: WESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION, LLC - 

### CIRCULATING 

### FLUIDIZED BED BOILER (CFB)

*Pollutant

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method COMBUSTION CONTROLS Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2000

, Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 24-HOUR Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method SNCR Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## 1: 0.1000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Avg. 30-DAY TimeiCondition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable (FPM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE Page 9

### of229

Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 0.0150



## Unit: LB/MMBTU 

# Avg. 3O-DAY 

### TimeiCondition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 30-DAY Time/Condition: 

### 'Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U



### http,,llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate mafrer, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission 

### Limit 1

## Avg. 30-DAY Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *Control

# Method LIME INJECTION

### AND FLASH DRYER ABSORBER 

### (FDA) Description: Emission 

### Limit Page 10 

### of229



# : 0.1400 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIMMBTU Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 3-HOUR Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.1400 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. 24-HOUR Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Sulfuric 

### Acid (mist, vapors, etc) *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *Control

# Method LIME INJECTION 

### AND FLASH DRYER ABSORBER 

### (FDA) Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0060 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/T CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LB'IT 

### CLINKER, PER TEST 

### METHOD Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg'. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U



### http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 

### 1l of229

Process 

### Information :WESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: CEMEÀTITIOUS 

### MATERIAT 

### KILN *Process

# Type: 90.006 Primary 

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 13.00 Throughput

# Unit: mmbtu ' Process

# Notes: KILN USES 

### FLYASH, 

### ALUMINA, GYPSUM, 

### AND LIMESTONE TO PRODUCE 

### CEMENTITIOUS 

### MATERIAL FOR RESALE. DOES 

### NOT UTILIZE STEAM FROM CFB. 

### KILN WILL COMBUST 

### APPROXIMATELY 0.5TPH OF 

### COAL. 

### KILN EXHAUST 

### WILL BE JOINED 

### WITH CFB 

### EXHAUST 

### AND EMITTED FROM 

### A COMMON STACK.

Pollutant Information: V/ESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC - 

### CEMENTITIOUS 

### MATERIAL 

### KILN

*Pollutant 

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COMBUSTION CONTROLS Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 24-HOUR Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides (I.{Ox) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control

# Method PERMITTEE 

### WILL ATTEMPT TO CONTROL 

### NOX 

### IN KILN EXHAUST 

# Description: BYVENTING THROUGH CFB SNCR. EFFECTIVENËSS, HOWEVER, IS 

### UNKNOWN 

### AT THIS 

### TIME Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 6.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBIT Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LB,IT 

### CLINKER, 30-DAY Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable (FPM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0650 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBIT Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. LBIT CLINKER, PER TEST 

### METHOD Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1300 Emissiôn 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LB/T CLINKER, PER TEST 

### METHOD Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. LP,Æ 

### CLINKER, PER TEST 

### METHOD Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Page 12 

### of229



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill.istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method CONDITIONING TOWER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.6000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB,Æ Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LB.IT 

### CLINKER, 3-HOUR Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfuric 

### Acid (mist, vapors, etc) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method CONDITIONNG TOV/ER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0250 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LBIT CLINKER, PERTËST 

### METHOD Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2tJnit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 13

### of229

Process 

### Information :WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: COAL 

### HANDLING *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 300.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process Notes:



### http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 14 

### of229

Pollutant 

### Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC - 

### COAL 

### HANDLING

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTERS Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: LIMESTONE 

### HANDLING *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 100.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆ{ Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC - 

### LIMESTONE 

### HANDLING

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTERS Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http:i/cþub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Process 

### Information :WESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC Page 15

### of229

*Process 

# Name: ASH 

### HANDLING *Process

# Type: 99.120 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 105.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆ{ Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC -ASH 

### HANDLING

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTERS Des'cription: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :WESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: PAVED HAULROADS *Process

# Type: 99.140 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION,LLC - 

### PAVED HAULROADS

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, 

### fugitive *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *Control

# Method SHALL 

### MAINTAIN PAVEMENT SHALL USE 

### VACUUM SV/EEPER 

# Description: AND WATER TRUCKS 

### MAX SPEED 15 

### MPH Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 90.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### REDUCTION Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Conditiorr: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit:

http://cfpub.epa.govirblclReports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 16 

### of229

Process 

### Information :WESTERN GREENBzuER CO-GENERATION, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: COOLING TOWER *Process

# Type: 99.009 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 55000.00 Throughput

# Unit: gallm Process 

# Notes: MAXIMUM TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS

# : 6,300 PPM.

Pollutant 

### Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER 

### CO-GENERATION, LLC - 

### COOLING TOWER
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method DRIFT ELIMINATORS @ 0.0005% 

### DRIFT RATE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.7900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 3.4600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a 

### " * 

### " besidethe RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: a1/25/2009 Contro] Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: 

### AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY

RBLC

## ID: FL-0282 

### *Corporate/Company AMERICANCEMENTCOMPANY,LLC Name: 

### *Facility 

## Name: AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY Facility

## State: FL Facility

### ZIP Code: 

### Facility Contact Name: 

### Facility Contact Phone:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report 

### PagelT 

### of229

Facility.Contact Email: Agency

# Name: FLOzuDA DEPT. OF 

### ENVIRONMENTLA PROTECTION Agency

# Contact: MS. TERESA HERON Agency 

# Phone: (850)921-9529 Agency 

# Email: teresa.heron@dep.state.fl.us 

# NAICS: 327310 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0211012006ACT Date determination

# last 0113112007 updated: Permit

# Type: A: NEWGREENFIELD 

### FACILITY Facility 

## Description: THE PROPOSED 

### FACILITY V/ILL BE

### A 

### NOMINAL 1,150,000 TONS PER 

### YEAR (TPY) DRY PROCESS 

### PORTLAND CEMENT 

### PLANT INCORPORATING 

### A DRY PROCESS 

### KILN WITH 

### A PREHEATER 

### AND CALCTNER (PH/C). Other

# Permitting MAJOR 

### EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED

### WITH THE 

### MAIN COMPONENTS 

# Information: OFTHE 

### PLANT 

### WILL INCLUDE THE 

### FOLLOWING:

.A MATERIALS STORAGE 

### BUILDING (MSB);

.

### A PRIMARY CRUSHER

### AT THE 

### QUARRY 

### AND BELT CONVEYORS TO 

### MSB;



### . RAW 

### MATERIAL PILES STORED 

### INSIDE OFTHE MSB. THE PILES 

### V/ILL INCLUDE LIMESTONE, 

### ALUMINA SOURCES (E.G. 

### BAUXITE, CLAY, 

### AND 

### coAL ASH), rRON SOURCES 

### (È.c. 

### MrLL SCALE 

### AND IRON ORE), 

### SILICA SOURCES 

### (8.G. SAND), 

### AND ADDITIVES (E.G. FELDSPAR);



### . MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

### INCLUDING PORTAL 

### RECLAIMERS, STACKERS, 

### BELT CONVEYORS, CONVEYOR FROM THE 

### MSB TO THE 

### RAW 

### MILL, CONTROL SYSTEN{/ANALYZER, ETC.;



### .

### AN IN-LINE RAV/ 

### MILL THAT SIMULTANEOUSLY DRIES 

### RAV/ 

### MATERIALS USING THE 

### EXHAUST GAS FROM THE 

### KILN,PHIC, AND CLINKER COOLER;



### .

### A PREHEATER 

### WITH STAGED 

### COMBUSTION 

### AND SELECTIVE 

### NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR) 

### SYSTEM;

.AN 

### AIR HEATER FOR USE

### WHEN

### ADDITIONAL DRYING CAPACITY IS 

### REQUIRED;

.A 

### NOMINAL 1O,OOOTON 

### BLENDING SILO;

.

### AN INDIRECT-FIRING SYSTEM 

### WITH 

### A LOWNOX 

### MAIN KILN BURNER 

### CAPABLE OF 

### BURNING COAL, PETROLEUM COKE, 

### FUEL OIL, AND 

### NATURAL GAS;

.

### A WHOLE TIRE FEEDER SYSTEM;

.

### A CLINKER COOLER 

### WITH RECIPROCATING GRATES, 

### COOLING

### AIR FANS, 

### AND HOT 

### AIR DUCTING TO THE 

### KILN AND PH/C;



### . CLINKER STORAGE

### AND GRINDING INCLUDING 

### A FINISH 

### MILL WITHAIR SEPARATOR, 

### CLINKER SILOS 

### WITH METERING DEVICE, LIMESTONE 

### AND GYPSUM PILES, 

### AND ASSOCIATED CONVEYORS;

.

### A CEMENT TRANSFER 

### AND STORAGE 

### FACILITY INCLUDING TRUCK LOADOUT 

### AND PACKHOUSE; 

### AND

.A 

### NOMINAL 18TPH 

### COAL AND PETROLEUM COKE 

### GRINDING SYSTEM 

### WITH ASSOCIATED 

### MILL, STORAGE 

### FACILITY, CONVEYORS, 

### INCLUDING 

### A FABRIC FILTER BAGHOUSE.

Affected Boundaries: 

### AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY 

### *Limit (Class 1Area

## or Chassahowitzka Name of the border of the



### http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

U.S.): Boundary Type (Class 

## 1 CLASS1

or 

### Intl Border): 

# Distance: 30.00 Class 1Area

# State: FL Page 18

### of229

Facility-wide Emissions :

### AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY

*Pollutant 

## Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 1588.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant

## Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 1068.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant

## Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 156.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions I 10.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 66.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information :

### AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY

*Process

# Name: CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 125.00 Throughput 

# Unit: ton/h clinker Process

# Notes: THE CLINKER PRODUCTION 

### RATE OFTHE 

### KILN SHALL NOT EXCEED 125TONS pER 

### HOUR (24-HOUR 

### ROTLING AVERAGE) 

### AND 1,O95,OOO TONS 

### DURING 

### ANY CONSECUTIVE 12 

### MONTH PERIOD. 

### ONLY THE 

### FOLLOWING AUTHOzuZED FUELS 

### SHALL BE FIRED 

### IN THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM 

### (KILN AND CALCINER): COAL, PETROLEUM COKE, 

### WHOLE OR CHIPPED TIRES, 

### NATURAL GAS, 

### AND NO. 2 

### FUEL OIL AND/OR ON-SPECIFICATION USED 

### OIL FUEL. THE 

### MAXIMUM HEAT INPUT RATE TO THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM 

### (KILN AND CALCINER) SHALL NOT EXCEED 9,600 

### MMBTU PER 

### DAY (NOMTNALLY 400 

### MMBTU/HR).

Pollutant Information: 

### AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM

*Pollutant

# Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method 

### Code: P xControl

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES Description:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 19

### of229

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 29000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBIT CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 30-DAY AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 362.5000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. 30-DAY AVERAGE Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides G.fOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A xControl 

# Method SELECTIVE 

### NON 

### CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR) LOV/ 

### NOX 

# Description: BURNERS 

### INDIRECT FIRING STAGED 

### COMBUSTION 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 1.9500 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/T CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE Time/Condiìion: Emission

# Limit2: 243.8000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1530 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBITON 

### CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. ANNUAL TEST Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 19.1300 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. ANNUAL TEST Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description:



### http:llcfpnb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIT CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 24-HR 

### ROLLING TimeiCondition: Emission

# Limit2: 15.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. 24-HR 

### ROLLING Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/T CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 30-DAY 

### BLOCK Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 15.0000 Emission 

### Limit

# 2Unt: LBÆI Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. 30-DAY 

### BLOCK Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT deci'sions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Dioxins 

### & Furans *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# unit: NG/DSCM (TEQ) Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.4000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: NG/DSCM (TEQ) F.mission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. TimeiCondition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Mercury *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: 

### Page2} 

### of229

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 122.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBll2 MONTH Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. ROLLING 

### TOTAL Time/Condition: Emission 

### Límit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Hydrocarbons, Total 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 50.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: PPMVD AS PROPANE Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 30-DAY 

### BLOCK Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2l of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * 

### " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: 1,1/25/2009 Control teôhnology 

### Determinations (Freeform)



### Facility Information: SUMTER/CENTER 

### HILL CEMENT 

### PLANT

RBLC ID: FL-0281 

# ' *Corporate/Company SUMTER 

### CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC Name:' *Facility 

# Name: SUMTER/CENTER 

### HILL CEMENT 

### PLANT Facility 

# State: FL Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 33514 

### Facility 

### ContactName: DAN FzuTZ Facility Contact 

### Phone: 3869355000 

### Facility Contact 

## Email: DRFRITZ(@VENAINC.COM Agency

# Name: FLORIDA DEPT. OF 

### ENVIRONMENTLA PROTECTION Agency

# Contact: MS. TERESA HERON Agency 

# Phone: (850)921-9529 Agency 

# Email: teresa.heron(â,dep.state.fl.us 

### NAICS: 327310



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Permit Issuance Date: Date determination last updated: Permit Type: 

### Facility Description:

Other Permitting Information: Page22

### of229

0210712006 ACT r010212007



### A: NEV//GREENFIELD 

### FACILITY SUMTER 

### CEMENT COMPANY (SCC) PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT 

### A DRY PROCESS 

### PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT WITH A 

### NOMINAL CAPACITY OF 1,715,500 TONS pER

### YEAR 

### (Tpy) OF 

### CLINKER. MAJOR 

### EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE 

### MAIN COMPONENTS OFTHE 

### PLANT 

### WILL INCLUDE THE 

### FOLLOWING:

.

### A RAW MATERIALS STORAGE 

### BUILDING (MSB) 

### AND 

### A LIMESTONE STORAGE 

### BUILDING;

.

### A PRIMARY CRUSHER 

### AT THE 

### QUARRY 

### AND BELT CONVEYORS TO 

### MSB;



### . RAW 

### MATERIAL PILES STORED 

### INSIDE OF

### THE STORAGE 

### BUILDINGS. THE PILES 

### WILL INCLUDE LIMESTONE, 

### ALUMINA SOURCES (E.G. 

### BAUXITE AND COAL ASH), 

### IRON SOURCES (E.G. 

### MILL SCALE, SLAG, 

### AND IRON ORE), 

### SLICA SOURCES (E.G. SAND, 

### AND CLAY), ANDADDITIVES (E.G. FELDSPAR, 

### AND GYPSUM);

. MATERIALS 

### HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

### INCLUDING RECLAIMERS, STACKERS, 

### BELT CONVEYORS, COVERED CONVEYORS 

### FROM THE MSB 

### AND LIMESTONE STORAGE 

### BUILDING TO THE 

### RAW 

### MILL, CONTROL 

### SYSTEM/ANALYZER, ETC.;

.

### AN IN-LINE RAV/ 

### MILL THAT SIMULTANEOUSLY DRIES 

### RAW MATERIALS USING THE 

### EXHAUST GAS FROM THE 

### KILN, PH/C,

### AND CLINKER COOLER;



### .

### A PREHEATER 

### V/ITH STAGED 

### COMBUSTION CALCINER 

### AND SELECTIVE 

### NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR) 

### SYSTEM;

.

### AN AIR HEATER FOR USE 

### WHEN 

### ADDITIONAL DRYING CAPACITY IS 

### REQUIRED;

.A 

### NOMINAL 12,000 TON PER 

### DAY BLENDING SILO;

. 

### AN INDIRECT-FIRING SYSTEM 

### V/ITHA LOV/ 

### NOX 

### MAIN KILN BURNER CAPABLE OF 

### BURNING COAL, PETROLEUM COKE, 

### FUEL OIL, AND 

### NATURAL GAS;



### .

### A WHOLE TIRE FEEDER 

### AND/OR TIRE 

### GASIFICATION SYSTEM.

.

### A CLINKER COOLER 

### WITH COOLING

### AIR FANS, 

### AND HOT 

### AIR DUCTING TO THE 

### KILN, PH/C, 

### AND RAW 

### MILL; 

## ' CLINKER STORAGE 

### AND GRINDING 

### INCLUDING TV/O 

### FINISH 

### MILLS WITH 

### AIR SEPARATORS, 

### CLINKER SILOS

### WITH METERING DEVICES, 

### LIMESTONE 

### AND GYPSUM BINS 

### AND ASSOCIATED CONVEYORS;



### . CEMENT TRANSFER 

### AND STORAGE SILOS,

### TRUCK LOADOUTS 

### AND PACKHOUSE; 

### AND

.A 

### NOMINAL 28.4 TP}{ 

### COAL AND/OR PETROLEUM COKE 

### GRINDING SYSTEM 

### WITH ASSOCIATED 

### MILL, STORAGE 

### FACILITY, ASSOCIATED CONVEYORS, 

### AND EQUIPPED 

### V/ITH A FABRIC FILTER BAGHOUSE.

Affected Boundaries: SUMTER/CENTER 

### HILL CEMENT 

### PLANT 

### *Limit (Class 1Area

# or Chassahowitzka Name of the border of the U.S.): BoundaryType (Class

# I CLASSl

or 

### Intl Border): Distance: Class 1Area Státe: 62.00 

### FL



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page23 

### of229

Facility-wide Emissions : SUMTER/CENTER 

### HILL CEMENT PLANT
*Pollutant 

## Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 2488.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 1675.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 388.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Sulflu Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 173.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 99.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information : SUMTER/CENTER 

### HILL CEMENT PLANT

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 208.30 Throughput 

# Unit: TÆ{

### CLINKER
PTOCEss

# Notes: 1,715,500TON 

### CLINKER DURING 

### ANY CONSECUTIVE 12 

### MONTH 

### pEzuoD. 208.3

### TON/HR (24-HR ROLLTNG 

### AVERAGE) FUEL 

### MAXIMUM HEAT 

### INPUT: 15,300 

### MMBTU/DAY (NOMINALLY 638 

### MMBTU/HR). ONLY THE 

### FOLLOWING AUTHOzuZED FUELS 

### SHALL BE FIRED 

### IN THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM 

### (KILN AND CALCINER): COAL, PETROLEUM COKE, 

### FLY ASH, GASIFIED TIRES, 

### WHOLE OR CHIPPED TIRES, 

### NATURAL GAS, 

### DISTILLATE OIL, AND/OR ON-SPECIFICATION USED 

### OIL FUEL. THE 

### MAXIMUM HEAT INPUT RATE TO THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM 

### (KILN AND CALCINER) SHALL NOT EXCEED 15,300 

### MMBTU PER 

### DAY G\TOMINALLY 63 8 

### MMBTU/HR).

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: SUMTER/CENTER 

### HILL CEMENT PLANT - CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM

*Pollutant 

## Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

## Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 2.9000 EMiSSiON 

### LiMit 1

## UNit: LBIT CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

## Avg. 3O-DAYS 

### ROLLING Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission

# Limit2: 604.1000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. 3O-DAYS 

### ROLLING Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page24 

### of229

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method SELECTIVE 

### NON 

### CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR) 

### LOW 

### NOX 

# Description: BURNERS 

### INDIRECT FIRING STAGED 

### COMBUSTION Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 1.9500 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/T CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 3O-DAYS 

### ROLLING AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 406.1900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. 30-DAYS 

### ROLLING AVERAGE Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.1530 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIT CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. ANNUAL TEST Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 31.8700 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. ANNUAL TEST Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method HYDRATED 

### LIME INJECTION Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/T CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 24-H 

### ROLLING Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll2S12009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission

## Limit2: 41.6600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. 24-H 

### ROLLING Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.1150 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIT CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Avg. 30-DAY BLOCK Time/Condition: Emission

## Limlt2: 23.9500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. 30-DAY BLOCK Time/Condition; 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Dioxins 

### & Furans 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## unit: NG/DSCM (TEQ) Emission 

### Limit 1

## Avg. ANNUAL TEST Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.4000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2unit: NG/DSCM (TEQ) Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. ANNUAL TEST Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisionS?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Mercury 

### *Control Method

### Code: N *Control Method Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## 1: 184.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB Emission 

### Limit 1

## Avg. TOTAL FOR 12-MONTH 

### ROLLING AVERAGE Time/Condition: Page25 

### of229



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Hydrocarbons, Total 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 50.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: PPMVD AS PROPANE Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 30-DAY 

### BLOCK Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology 'considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page26 

### of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: Ia/25/2009 Controf Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)



### Facility Information: 

### HOLCIM (US), 

### INC.

RBLC ID: *Corporate/Company
Name: 

### *Facility 

## Name: HOLCIM (US), 

### INC. Facility 

## State: MS 

### Facility 

### ZIP

## Code: 39136 

### Facility 

### ContactName: JAMES 

### BOYD Facility 

### ContactPhone: 6622725121 

### Facility Contact Email : Agency

## Name: MISSISSPPI DEPT OF 

### ENV 

### QUALITY Agency

## Contact: MS. 

### CARLA BROWN Agency 

## Phone: (601) 961-5235 Agency 

## Email: CARLA_BROWN(øDEQ.STATE.MS.US NAICS: 

### 32t3t0 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0812012004 ACT Date 

### determinationlast 0210812005 updated: Permit Type: MS-0071



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page27 

### of229

Facility 

## Description: THIS IS

### A V/ET PROCESS 

### CEMENT (PORTLAND) MANUFACTURING PLANT. THE PROJECT 

### UNDER REVIEV/ WAS Other Permitting Information:



### Facility-wide Emissions :

### HOLCIM (IJS),INC.

*Pollutant

# Name: Nitrogen Oxides G.fOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions -40.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLCIM (US),INC.

*Process 

# Name: POPRTLAND CEMENT 

### MANUFACTURING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 650000.00 Throughput

# Unit: TON CLINKER/YR Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLCIM (US), 

### INC. - 

### POPRTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING
*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Bmission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBÆ Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 2625.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### NorE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: 

### '1,L/25/2009 control- Technorogy 

### Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT 

### CoMpANy - 

### MASON CITY PLANT
RBLC

# ID: IA-0070 

### *Corporate/Company LEHIGHCEMENTCOMPANY Name:



### http:llcþub.epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page28

### of229

*Facility 

# Name: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

### CITY PLANT 

### Facility

# State: IA Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 50401 

### Facility 

### ContactName: RITA DLINN Facility 

### ContactPhone: 6414213459 

### Facility 

### ContactEmail: RDUNN@LEHIGHCEMENT.COM Agency

# Name: IOWA DEPARTMENT OF 

### NATURAL RESOURCES 

# ' Agency

# Contact: MR. 

### GARY SMITH Agency 

# Phone: (515) 281-4635 Agency

# Email: GARY.SMITH@DNR.STATE.IA.US 

# NAICS: 327310 Permit Issuance 

# Date: l2llll2003 ACT Date determination

# last 0211512007 updated: Permit

# Type: B: 

### ADD NEW PROCESS TO 

### EXISTING 

### FACILITY C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS 

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY Facility 

## Description: PLEASE 

### NOTE THAT 

### A WET SCRUBBER WAS 

### ADDED FOR 

### BACT WHICH RESULTS 

### IN A NET DECREASE 

### IN PLANT EMISSIONS OF SO2 OF

### AROUND 5,400 TONS/YR. THE 

### TABLE BELO'W DOES 

### NOT 

### ALLOW NEGATIVE NUMBERS. Other

# Permitting PROJECT 

### NUMBER 2003-490

### AND 05-282. THE PERMIT 

### NUMBER 

# 'Information: LISTED ABOVE IS THE 

### FACILITY"S PLANT NUMBER.

Facility-wide Emissions :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY 

### PLANT
*Pollutant 

## Name: CarbonMonoxide Facility-wide 

### Emissions 918.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Nitrogen Oxides (I.{Ox) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 444.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 219.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 29.8000 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

### CITY PLANT

*Process 

# Name: KILN/CALCINER/PREHEATER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 150.00 Throughput

# Unit: TlH Process

# Notes: Throughput is

### t clinker/h

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

## cITy PLANT

htfp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### KILN/CAL CINER/PREHEATER Page29

### of229

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method ESP. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5160 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LBIT OF 

### CLINKER Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Untt: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPM10)' *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control

# Method ESP. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5160 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LP,IT Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LB/TON OF 

### CLINKER Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method ESP. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 15.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unil Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence

http://cfpub 

### .epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 I112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method WET SCRUBBER. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 1.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB,IT Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. LB,Æ OF 

### CLINKER Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 530.3000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factörs, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 30 

### of229

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) *Control Method 

### Code: B *Control

# Method SNCR, 

### LOW 

### NOX BURNERS, 

### COMBUSTION CONTROLS, 

### AND 

# Description: PROPER 

### KILN DESIGN. Emission 

### Limit 

# l: 2.8500 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LBIT OF 

### CLINKER Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1496.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PROPER 

### KILN DESIGN 

### AND OPERATION. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 3.7000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LBIT OF 

### CLINKE Time/Condition:

. Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?: Page31

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT

xProcess

# Name: CLINKER COOLER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 150.00 Throughput

# Unit: TiH Process

# Notes: Throughput ist/h raw feed

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - 

### CLINKER COOLER

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE. 

### ALL LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT 

### AND 

### BACK HALF 

## Description: EMISSIONS. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

'*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE)



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission 

### Límit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 32 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY 

### PLANT

*Process 

# Name: BUCKET ELEVATOR FEED -

### CEMENT SILO *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 275.00 Throughput

# Unit: TlfI
Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - 

### BUCKET ELEVATOR FEED



### . CEMENT SILO

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE. 

### ALL LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT 

### AND BACK HALF 

## Description: EMISSIONS. Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: EmissionLimit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE. THERE IS 

### ALSO A NAAQS 

### LIMIT OF 0.34 

### LBIÍL ALL 

## Description: LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT 

### AND 

### BACK HALF EMISSIONS.

http://cfpub 

### .epa.govlrblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. TimelCondition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page33

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY 

### PLANT

*Process 

# Name: SHIPPING 

### DISCHARGE SPOUTS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 385.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process

# Notes: There are2 spouts 

### (A&B). Each has its own emission point. The 

### limits are the

same 

### for both emission points.

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - SHIPPING 

### DISCHARGE SPOUTS

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology ' considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### *PollutantName *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: 'Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### *PollutantName *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 34

### of229

Particulate matter, filterable < 

### A BAGHOUSE.

0.0090 GR/DSCF



### Visible Emissions 

### (VE) 

### A BAGHOUSE.

5.0000 % 

### OPACITY 

### l0 ¡r 

### (FPMI0)

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY 

### PLANT

*Process Name: *Process Type: Primary Fuel: 

### AIRSLIDES 

### & 

### SIOS - 

### CEMENT SILO 90.028



### http://cfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl2S12009Format 

### RBLC Report 

# Throughput: 275.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process Notes: Page 35

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

### CITY PLANT -

### AIRSLIDES 

### & SILOS - 

### CEMENT SILO

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContToI

# Method BAGHOUSE. 

### ALL LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT 

### AND BACK 

### HALF 

# Description: EMISSIONS. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. THERE IS ALSO 

### A NAAQS 

### LIMIT OF 1.16 

### LBiH.

### ALL 

# Description: LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT 

### AND BACK HALF EMISSIONS. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2:

http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 36 o1229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT

*Process 

# Name: PAN 

### & BUCKET ELEVATORS - 

### CLINKER SILO *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 165.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆI Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - 

### PAN 

### & BUCKET ELEVATORS - 

### CLINKER SILO

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: 

### ilmission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2UniT: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page37 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

### CITY PLANT

*Process 

# Name: PAN CONVEYOR 

### & SILO - 

### CLINKER SILO *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 165.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆ{ Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - 

### PAN CONVEyOR 

### & SILO - 

### CLINKER SILO

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 0.0090



# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2.: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence



### http:/lcfpub.epa.govirblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors; other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 38 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT

*Process

# Name: SILO 

### WITHDRAWAL *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 330.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TlÍI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY



### . MASON CITY PLANT - SILO 

### WITHDRAWAL

*Pollutant

## Name Particulate Matter (PM)



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 I112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 39

### of229



### A BAGHOUSE.

0.0090 GR/DSCF

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Ltmit2 Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

http://cfpub 

### .epa.govhblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 IIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT Page40

### of229

*Process

# Name: CONVEYOR 

### AND ELEVATORS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 220.00 Throughput 

# Unit: T/H Process 

# Notes: There are 2 units 

### with the exact same 

### limits. One isthe Cement 

### Roll Press Feed Conv 

### & Elev andthe other isthe Cement 

### Mill Feed Conv 

### & Bucket Elev.

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - CONVEYOR 

### AND ELEVATORS

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContTol

# Method BAGHOUSE. 

### ALL LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT 

### AND BACK HALF 

# Description: EMISSIONS. 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



# : 5.0000 

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Page

## 4l of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

### CITY PLANT

*Process

# Name: SEPARATOR 

### VENT - 

### CLINKER PREGRIND *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 220.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TIII Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - SEPARATOR 

### VENT - 

### CLINKER PREGRIND

xPollutant

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 0.0100



# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMlO) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IllZ5l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology ôonsiderations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page42

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT

### coMPANy - 

### MASON 

### cITy PLANT

*Process 

# Name: MATERIAL TRANSFER 

### TO SCRUBBER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 100.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TIH Process 

# Notes: There are

### 2 identical emission units. They each have their own emission points and the 

### limits are the same.

POIIUtANt INfOTmation: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - 

### MATERIAL TRANSFER 

### TO SCRUBBER
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg.



### http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 43

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

## cITy PLANT

*Process

# Name: MATERIAL TRANSFER 

### FROM SCRUBBER. *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 25.00



### http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page44 

### of229

Throughput

# Unit: TlÍI

Process 

# Notes: There are 3 identical emission units. Each has its own emission point and the emission 

### limits are the same.

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - 

### MATERIAL TRANSFER 

### FROM SCRUBBER.

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations infl uence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Lifhit 1

# unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 45

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

### CITY PLANT

*Process

# Name: SECONDARY 

### FUEL 

### HANDLING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 110.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆ{ Process

# Notes: There are2 secondaryfuel receiving emission units and 2 secondary fuel conveying emission units. Each unit has its own baghouse and emission point. The 

### limits are all the same for these units. See

### facility notes for fuel types.

POIIutant InfoTmation: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON 

### CITY PLANT - SECONDARY 

### FUEL 

### HANDLING

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0090 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

# ' *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other th'en air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 46 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT

*Process 

# Name: SECONDARY 

### MATERIAL HANDLING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# ' Throughput: 110.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TIH

PTOCess

# Notes: THERE ARE 2 SEC. 

### MATEzuAL RECEIVING UNITS 

### AND 2 SEC. 

### MAT. CONVEYING UNITS. EACH EMISSION UNIT HAS 

### ITS OWN BAGHOUSE 

### AND EMISSION POINT. 

### ALL OFTHE 

### EMISSION UNITS ARE THE SAME.

POIIutAnt InfoTmation: 

### LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MASON CITY PLANT - SECONDARY 

### MATERIAL HANDLING

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE,. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l20OgFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: 

### Emissiontimit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: Page 47

### of229

Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) 

### A BAGHOUSE.

0.0100 GR/DSCF



### Visible Emissions 

### (VE) 

### A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE. Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### NorE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " beside the RBLC rD. 

### Report 

### Date: 

## tt/zs/zoo9 control Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)



### Facility Information: ROANOKE CEMENT

RBLC 

### ID: *Corporate/Company
Name: 

### vA-0283 Roanoke Cement Company



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Facility Name: 

### Facility State: 

### Facility 

### ZIP Code: 

### Facility Contact Name: 

### Facility Contact Phone: 

### Facility Contact Email: Agency Name: Agency Contact: Agency Phone: Agency Email: 

### NAICS: Permit Issuance Date: Date determination last updated: Permit Type:


### Facility Description: Other Permitting Information: Page 48

### of229

ROANOKE CEMENT 

### VA 24t75



### VIRGINIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR DIV. MR. YOGESH 

### DOSHI (804)6e8-40t7 YNDOSHT@DEQ.VrRcrNrA. 

### cOV 327310 0611312003 ACT 0612812004

B: 

### ADD NEW PROCESS TO 

### EXISTING 

### FACILITY C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS 

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY CEMENT MANUFACTURING Roanoke Cement is asking for the increase 

### in CO emission levels 

### for the No. 5

### kiln system based on the expectation of continued increase 

### in carbon in the rock strata supplying raw material. No physical changeswere made at the 

### facility, i.e., there was no increase in permitted throughput.

Process 

### Information : 

### ROANOKE CEMENT

*Process Name: *Process Type: Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes: 

### CEMENT 

### KILN SYSTEM, #5 90.028 

### COAL 1300000.00 

### T/YR Throughput is clinker production. The 

### No. 5 

### kiln system (main stack) includes the original hot rotary end, recent six stage preheater/precãlciner tower, both original raw 

### mills (normally heated by the 

### kiln's exhaust from the preheater) andthe kiln's recently replaced 

### alkali bypass system.

Pollutant Information: 

### RoANOKE CEMENT - 

### CEMENT 

### KrLN

### sysrEM, #5
*Pollutant

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P *CONtTOI

# MEthOd PROCESS 

### CONTROLiGOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES 

### Descriptioni Emission 

### Limit

# l: 3.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air



### http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 II/25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 49

### of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * 

### " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: 11'/25/2009 Controf Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)



### Facility Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH

RBLC 

### ID: sD-0003 

### *CorporatelCompany GCC 

### DACOTAH Name: 

### *Facilþ

# Name: GCC 

### DACOTAH Facility 

# State: SD 

### Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 57709 

### Facility 

### ContactName: GENE 

### NELSON Facility Contact 

### Phone: 605-721-7033 

### Facility Contact 

## Email: GNELSON@GCC.COM Agency

# Name: SOUTH 

### DAKOTA DEPT OF 

### WATER 

### & NAT'L RES Agency

# Contact: MR. 

### BRIAN GUSTAFSON Agency 

# Phone: (605)7730-3151 Agency Email: 

### NAICS: 327310 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0411012003 ACT Date determination

# last 0910512003 updated: Permit

# Type: B: 

### ADD NEW PROCESS TO 

### EXISTING 

### FACILITY C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY Facility 

## Description: GCC 

### DACOTAH QUARRYS 

### LIMESTONE, SAND, 

### AND GYPSUM 

### IN THE SURROUNDING 

### AREA TO PROVIDE 

### RAV/ 

### MATERIALS FOR ITS 

### PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT. OTHER 

### RAW 

### MATERIALS SUCH AS IRON 

### AND SHALEARE SHIPPED 

### IN BY TRUCK FROM OTHER AREAS. 

### COAL IS USED AS THE 

### HEAT SOURCE 

### AND IS SHIPPED 

### IN BY RAILCAR. THE 

### LIMESTONE IS PROCESSED 

### THROUGH CRUSHERS 

### AND SCREENS BEFORE 

### CONVEYOR BELTS TRANSFER 

### IT TO

### A RAV/ 

### MATERIAL STORAGE SHED. CONVEYORS TRANSFER THE 

### RAV/ 

### MATERIAL TO 

### MILLS. THE 

### MILLS GRIND THE 

### RAV/ 

### MATERIAL FOR TWO V/ET 

### KILN PROCESSES 

### AND FOR 

### A DRY 

### KILN PROCESS 

### (ROTARY 

### KILN #6). THE GROLTND 

### MATERIAL IS 

### TEMPORAzuLY STORED 

### IN SILOS BEFORE 

### IT IS TRANSFERRED TO THE 

### KILNS. THE DRY 

### KILN PROCESS 

### INCLUDES 

### A PREHEATER 

### AND 

### A PRECALCINATOR. THE THREE 

### KILNS PRODUCE 

### CLINKER, WHICH IS 

### CONVEYED TO 

### A CLINKER STORAGE SHED. THE 

### CLINKER IS

### THEN SENTTO THE 

### FINISH 

### MILLS V/HERE GYPSUM IS 

### ADDED TO PRODUCE CEMENT. THE 

### CEMENT IS 

### PNEUMATICALLY TRANSFERRED TO 

### CEMENT STORAGE SILOS BEFORE 

### IT IS EITHER 

### BAGGED OR 

### BULK LOADED 

### IN TRUCKS 

### AND RAILCARS. Other

# Permitting GCC Dacotah owns and operates a limestone quaffy and portland cement 

# Information: manufacturing

### facility in Rapid 

### City, South Dakota. GCCDacotah submitted



### htfp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page 50

### of229

a Prevention 

### of Significant Deterioration permit application 

### for a modif,rcation that occurred 

### in 1996 to rotary 

### kiln #6. Rotary 

### kiln #6 burns coal to produce heat, which transforms limestone and other raw materials into clinker. Gypsum is addedto the clinker and ground to produce portland cement. The modification increased the production capacity of rotary 

### kiln #6

### from 1,650 to 2,250 tons 

### of clinker per day.

Affected Boundaries: GCC 

### DACOTAH


### *Limit (Class 1Area

## or Badlands Name of the border of the U.S.): Boundary Type (Class 

## 1 CLASS1
or 

### Intl Border): Distance:

50.00 70.00 Class 1Area

## State: SD 

### *Limit (Class 1Area

## or Wind Cave NP Name of the border of the U.S.): BoundaryType (Class 

## 1 CLASSl

or 

### Intl Border): Distance: Class 1Area

## State: SD



### Facility-wide Emissions : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Pollutant 

## Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 2002.0000(Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 2267.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 235.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 885.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: PRIMARY 

### AND SECONDARY CRUSHERS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: LIMESTONE 

# Throughput: 1000.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 II/2512009Format 

### RBLC 

## Report Page 51 of 229

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### PRIMARY 

### AND SECONDARY CRUSHERS
*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg, Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0)



### A FABzuC 

### FILTER

0.0100 GR/DSCF

Process 

### Information :GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process Name: *ProcessType: Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes: SCREEN 90.028 

### LIMESTONE 1000.00 

### TIIT

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - SCREEN
*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10)



### A FABRIC FILTER

0.0100 GR/DSCF

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH



### hrtp:llcfpttb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 52

### of229

*Process 

# Name: RAW 

### MATERIAL TRANSFER; 

### FROM

## STO GE TO 

### KILN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: LIMESTONE 

# Throughput: 180.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process

# Notes: TRANSFER FROM 

### RAW 

### MATEzuAL STORAGE 

### BUILDING TO 

### TWO 

### KILN FEED storage silos

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### RAW 

### MATERIAL TRANSFER, FROM STORAGE TO 

### KILN

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, f,rlterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## l: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process

# Name: ROCK SILO TO LOESCHE 

### MILL *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 180.00 Throughput

# Unit: TI}J Process

# Notes: Throughput is limestone

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### RocK sILo To LOESCHE 

### MILL 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit:

http://cfpub 

### .epa.govlrblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 53

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: STORAGE SILO, 

### KILN FEED TO 

### KILN #6 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: 160.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆI Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH 

### - STORAGE SILO, 

### KILN FEED TO 

### KILN #6
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unit:. Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: CLINKER SHED TO 

### FINISH 

### MILLS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 500.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### CLINKER SHED

### To FINISH 

### MILLS 

## *PollutantName Particulate 

### matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A

http://cfpub 

### .epa.govhblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 T112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

xControl 

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 54

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*PTocess

# Name: RAV/ 

### MATERIAL TRANSFER, 

### RAW SHED TO LOESCHE 

### MILL *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 40.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:

POIIutAnt InfoTmation: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### RAVI 

### MATEzuAL TRANSF.ER, 

### RAV/ SHED TO LOESCHE 

### MILL 

# *PollutantName Particulate 

### maltet,filterable 

### < 10 F

### GPMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: RAV/ 

### MATEzuAL TRANSFER, 

### FROM 

### BELT 

### CoNVEyoR 107 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel:



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestJimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RÐLC Report 

# Throughput: 800.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process Notes: Page 55

### of229

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### RAW 

### MATERIAL TRANSFER, FROM 

### BELT CONVEYOR 107 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



# : 0.0100 

# Unit: GR/DSCF 

# Avg.

\

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: RAW 

### MATERIAL TRANSFER,RAV/ SHED (2)TO LOESCHE 

### MILL *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 40.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### RAV/ 

### MATEzuAL TRANSFER,RAV/ SHED (2)TO LOESCHE 

### MILL

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 F

### GPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air



### http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page56

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: GYPSUM 

### RAV/ SHED (2) *Process

# Type: 90.024 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 350.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆ{ Process

# Notes: Transfer to old clinker bldg. Two identical units.

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - GYPSUM 

### RAW SHED (2)
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: PENTHOUSE STORAGE #2 (Ì.{ORTH #1) *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: CLINKER 

# Throughput: 2250.00 Throughput

# Unit: TID Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - PENTHOUSE STORAGE #2 G\IORTH #1) 

# *FollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAtlFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 57 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: PENTHOUSE 

### STORAGE#2 (NORTH #2) *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: CLINKER 

# Throughput: 2250.00 Throughput

# Unit: TID Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - PENTHOUSE 

### STORA3E #2 

### (NORTH #2)
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technolirgy considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: PENTHOUSE 

### STORAGE#2 (NORTH 

### #3)' *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: CLINKER 

# Throughput: 2250.00 Throughput

# Unit: TID Process Notes:



### http.,lbfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 58 

### of229

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - PENTHOUSE STORAGE #2 

### (NORTH #3)
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: ROCK SILO 

### DISCHARGE *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 1000.00 Throughput

# Unit: TlfI Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### ROCK SILO 

### DISCHARGE
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0,0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH



### hnp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page 59

### of229

*Process 

# Name: ROTARY 

### KILN #6 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: CLINKER 

# Throughput: 2250.00 Throughput

# Unit: TID Process

# Notes: Rotary 

### kiln #6 bums coal as aheat source. Approximately 35Yo of the coal is burned in the preheaterþrecalcinator andthe remaining 65Yà 

### of the coal is burned in the main burner of the 

### kiln. The emission 

### limits for 

### NOx, SO2, and CO arefor the entire 

### kiln system.The 

### kiln system has three emission points (1

- Rotary 

### kiln #6, 2

### - ALkali bpyass and alkali waste to waste bin transfer system, and 3 - 

### coal 

### Mill) compliance 

### with the So2, 

### co, and 

### Nox emission 

### limtis

### will be based on continuous emission monitoring systems.

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### ROTARY 

### KILN #6
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 11.9500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P *CONtToI

# Method INHERENT SCRUBBING EFFECT OF PROCESSING 

### LIMESTONE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 632.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBÆI Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 885.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method PREHEATER/PRECALCINATOR SYSTEM Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 2267.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 3250.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2002.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 60 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

+Process

# Name: CLINKER COOLER, 

### DRY PROCESS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: CLINKER 

# Throughput: 2250.00 Throughput

# Unit: TID Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### CLINKER 

### cooLER, DRy PROCESS
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description:



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l20;09Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 8.5900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 61

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: MATEzuAL TRANSFER, 

### ALKALI *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: CLINKER 

# Throughput: 2250.00 Throughput

# Unit: TID Process

# Notes: Process is alkali bypass and 

### alkali waste to waste bin transfer. The emission 

### limits for 

### Nox, so2, and

## co arefor the entire 

### kiln system. The 

### kiln system hasthree emission points (1 - Rotary 

### kiln #6, 2 -

### Alkali bpyass and 

### alkali 

# ' waste to waste bin transfer system, and 3 - 

### coal 

### Mill) compliance 

### with the SO2, CO, and 

### NOx emission 

### limits 

### will be based on continuous emission monitoring systems.

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### MATERIAL TRANSFER, 

### ALKALI
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate mattet, f,rlterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 2.3600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influqnce the 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control Method



### http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2267.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2 Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 62

### of229

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P *COntToI

# Method INHERENT SCRUBBING EFFECT OF PROCESSING 

### LIMESTONE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 632.0000 Emission 

### Limit I

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 885.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR 

# ' Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 3250.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2002.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :GCC 

### DACOTAH

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

xProcess

## Name: FINISH 

### MILL #3 *Process

## Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

## Throughput: 35.00 Throughput 

## Unit: TIH Process Notes: Page 63 

### of229

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### FINISH 

### MILL #3 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL #4 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 40.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TÆ{ Process Notes:



### ' Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### FINISH 

### MILL #4
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, f,rlterable 

### < r0 lr 

### (FpMlO) *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GRiDSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unt: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll125/2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 64

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL #5 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 45.00 Throughput

# Unit: TlÍI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### FINISH 

### MILL #5
xPollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2IJnit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL #6 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 45.00 Throughput

# Unit: TI}J Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### FINISH 

### MILL #6 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 65 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

+Process 

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL 

## #l (MILL SWEEP) *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 85.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### FINISH 

### MILL #7 

### (MILL SWEEP)
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Ernission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF EmiSsion 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL #7 

### (MILL SEPARATOR) *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 85.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process Notes:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Il/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 66

### of229

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### FINISH 

### MILL #7 

### (MILL SEPARATOR)

+Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, 

### filteiable 

### < 10 F (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: þmission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL #7 (TRANSFER) *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 500.00 Throughput

# Unit: TlfI
Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### FINISH 

### MILL #7 (TRANSFER)
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg.



## , Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http:llcfpttb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Prooess 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH Page 67

### of229

+Process 

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL #7 (TRANSFER #2) *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 500.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TI}J Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### FINISH 

### MILL #7 (TRANSFER #2)
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: CLINKER TRANSFER SYSTEM *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 500.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### CLINKER TRANSFER 

### sysrEM 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition:



# . EmissionLimit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit:

http:llcþub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### ll/25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 68

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #1 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 125.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIIJ Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### BULK STORAGE SILOS #1
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) xControl Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2 Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process

# Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #2 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 125.0i0 Throughput 

# Unit: TIH Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### BULK

### sroRAGE

### sll-os #2 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 69

### of229



# : 0.0100 

# Unit: GR/DSCF

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #3 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 125.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process Notes:



### Pollutantlnformation: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### BULK STORAGE SILOS #3 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition:' Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

+Process 

# Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #4 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 125.00



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25lZ00gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Throughput 

# Unit: TIH Process Notes: Page 70 

### of229

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### BULK STORAGE SILOS #4
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process

# Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #5 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 200.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TIH Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH -

### BULK STORAGE SILOS #5
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### hnp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Repofs/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report 

### PageTI 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: RAIL STORAGE SILOS #1 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 125.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### RAIL STORAGE SILOS #1
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 

### p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: EmiSsion 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT dêcisions?:

Process 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: RAIL STORAGE SILOS #2 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 125.00 Throughput

# Unit: TI}J Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### RAIL STORAGE SILOS #2
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matler, filterable 

### < 

### l0 F

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 72 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: RAIL STORAGE SILOS #3 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 125.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### RAIL STORAGE SILOS #3
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: 

# ' Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. TirÌre/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then 

### air pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: BULK RAIL LOADOUTS 

### #l *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 500.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TIH Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### BULK RAIL 

## LoADours #1



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 F

### GPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page73 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: BULK RAIL LOADOUTS #2 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 500.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆI Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### BULK RAIL LOADOUTS #2
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

.

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: EAST 

### BULK TRUCK LOADOUT *Process

# Type: 90.028



### http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblclReports/RptDetaill.istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 500.00 Throughput

# Unit: TlÍI

Process Notes: Page74

### of229

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - EAST 

### BULK TRUCK 

### LOADOUT 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process

# Name: BULK TRUCK LOADOUT, V/EST *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 500.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIIJ Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### BULK TRUCK 

## LoADour, 'WEST *Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page75

### of229

Process 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process

# Name: CEMENT BAGGING #1 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 114.00 

# - Throughput 

# Unit: TÆI Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - CEMENT 

### BAGGING #1
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT BAGGING #2 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 114.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TIIJ Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - CEMENT 

### BAGGING #2
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: GR/DSCF



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air



# . pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page76 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT 

### BAGGING #3 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 114.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIIJ Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### CEMENT BAGGING #3
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: COAL 

### MILL *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 20.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆ{ Process

# Notes: The emission 

### limits for 

### NOx, SO2, and CO arefor the entire 

### kiln system. The 

### kiln system hasthree emission points (1 - Rotary 

### kiln #6, 2 -

### Alkali bpyass and alkali wasteto waste bin transfer system, and 3 - Coal 

### Mill) Compliance



### http:/icþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



# . Page77 

### of229

with the SO2, CO, and 

### NOx emission 

### limtis 

### will be based on continuous emission monitoring systems.

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### COAL 

### MILL

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.0900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unif: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfrr Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P *COntToI

# Method INHERENT SCRUBBING EFFECT OF PROCESSING 

### LIMESTONE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 632.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 885.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PREHEATER/PRECALCINATOR SYSTEM Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2267.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg.



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 3250.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 2002.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 78 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process

# Name: COAL STACKER TOP *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 400.00



## . Throughput 

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### COAL STACKER TOp 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method FABzuC 

### FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblo/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?: Page79 

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: COAL SURGE 

### BIN TOP (2) *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 400.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process

# Notes: 2 identical units

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### COAL SURGE 

### BIN TOP (2)
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Límit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: COAL TUNNEL TO 

### COAL STACKER *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 400.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIII Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### COAL TLTNNEL 

### To COAL STACKER
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit I Avg.



### http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: Emisdion 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 80

### of229

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: COAL TRANSFER *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 400.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### COAL TRANSFER
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10'p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABzuC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# l: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology eonsiderations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: COAL 

### BIN #6 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 400.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### COAL 

### BIN #6



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 81 

### of229

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### tControl Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission L,imit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

# Name: COAL DRYER - FK PUMP *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 20.00 Throughput

# Unit: TI}J Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### COAL DRYER - 

### FK PUMP 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information : GCC 

### DACOTAH

*Process 

## Name: COAL HOPPER TO 

### CONVEYOR



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 400.00 Throughput 

# Unit: TÆ{ Process Notes: Page 82 

### of229

Pollutant 

### Information: GCC 

### DACOTAH - 

### COAL HOPPER TO CONVEYOR
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, f,rlterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 0.0100



# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then 

### air pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * 

### " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: 1'1-/25/2009 Control- Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)

Facility 

### Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

RBLC

# ID: MO-0059 

### *Corporate/Company CONTINENTALCEMENTCOMPANY Name: 

### *Facility

# Name: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC Facility

# State: MO Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 63401 

### Facility 

### ContactName: JERRY EPPERSON 

### Facility Contact 

### Phone: 573 221-1740 

### Facility Contact Email: Agency 

# Name: MISSOUzu DNR, 

### AIR POLL CONTROL PROGRAM Agency

# Contact: MS. 

### KYRA MOORE Agency

# Phone: (573) 526-3835 Agency

# Email: KYRA.MOORE@DNR.MO.GOV 

# NAICS: 327310 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0912412002 ACT Date determination 

# last 0911712003 updated: Permit

# Type: A: NEV//GREENFIELD 

### FACILITY FACiIitY 

### DESCTiPtiON: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY INTENDS TO REPLACE ITS



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Other Permitting Information: Page 83

### of229

EXISTING CEMENT 

### KILN WITH A NEIW, 

### LARGER CAPACITY CEMENT 

### KILN. THE 

### NEW 

### KILN IS DESIGNED TO INCREASE 

### ANNUAL PRODUCTION OF 

### CLINKER FROM 0.6

### MILLION TONS TO 1.6 

### MILLION TONS. THE 

### NEV/ OPERATIONS 

### WILL INCLUDE 

### A FUTURE LINDERGROTIND 

### LIMESTONE MINE, 

### A SHALE QUARRY, 

### A RAW FEED 

### MATEzuAL STORAGE 

### AND CONVEYING SYSTEM, 

### DRY PROCESS 

### MILLING, A PREHEATER PRECALCINER 

### KILN SYSTEM, CONVERSION OF THE 

### EXISTING WET 

### RAW 

### MILL TO

### A FINISH 

### MILL, ANDADDITIONAL ALTERNATIVE FUEL STORAGE 

### AND FEED SYSTEMS. THE 

### RAW 

### MATERIAL IS SIZED 

### AND BLENDED INTO

### A FINE POWDER. 

### IN THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM THE 

### RAV/ 

### MATERIAL IS TRANSFORMED 

### INTO SPHERICALLY SHAPED NODULES 

### CALLED CLINKERS. THE 

### NEV/ PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM 

### WILL CONSIST OF

### A PREHEATER 

### WITH 

### A PYROCLON 

### IN

### A VERTICAL TOV/ER 

### CONFIGURATION. 

### A PRECALCINER, 

### LOCATED 

### AT THE BASE OF THE TOWER, 

### WILL BE EQUIPPED 

### WITH 

### A 

### MAIN BURNER 

### ANDA LOW NOX BURNER. THE PYROCLON 

### UNIT IS DESIGNED TO REDUCE CO EMISSIONS 

### FOLLOWING THE LOW 

### NOX BURNERS 

### IN THE PRECALCINER. 

### INADDITION,

### A SELECTIVE 

### NON

### CATALYTIC REDUCTION SYSTEM (SNCR)

### WILL BE USED TO INJECT 

### ANAMMONIA-BASED MATERIAL INTO THE SYSTEM TO REDUCE 

### NOX EMISSIONS. 

### LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES 

### WILL BE THE 

### PRIMARY FUEL, 'WITH 

### COAL AS

### A BACK-UP, 

### IN THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM. THE 

### DIRECT COAL BURNING SYSTEM 

### WILL BE REPLACED 

### BYAN INDIRECT SYSTEM 

### THAT

### WILL REQUIRE 

### A HOT GAS GENERATOR, 

### A NEW BAGHOUSE COLLECTOR 

### AND

### A COAL 

### MILL STACK. TO

### ACCOMMODATE 

### ALTERNATIVE FUEL USAGE, 

### NEV/ STORAGE 

### TANKS 

### WILL BE 

### ADDED FOR 

### LIQUID ALTERNATIVE FUELS,

### AND A NEW SOLIDS PROCESSING 

### AND STORAGE 

### BUILDING WILL BE 

### ADDED FOR SOLID 

### ALTERNATIVE FUELS. 

### A NET EMISSIONS INCREASE 

### ANALYSIS WAS CONDUCTED FOR THIS PROJECT 

### V/HICH DETERMINED THAT THE 

### NET EMISSION INCREASE FORTHE PROJECT 

### V/OULD NOT EXCEED 

### THE SIGNIFICANT 

### LEVEL FOR 

### ANY AIR POLLUTANT. HOWEVER, FOR THE NET EMISSIONS INCREASE TO BE LESS

### THAN THE SIGNIFICANCE 

### LEVEL, STRINGENT CONTROLS 

### ARE MADE 

### A PART OFTHE 

### PERMIT. THESE CONTROLS 

### INCLUDE THE USE OF 

### FABRIC FTLTERS (FOR 

### pM10 CONTROL), 

### A WET SCRUBBER 

### AND LOW SULFUR 

### COAL FOR 

### CONTROL OF SULFUR OXIDES, 

### LOV/-NOX BURNERS 

### AND SELECTIVE 

### NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR) FOR 

### CONTROL OF 

### NITROGEN OXIDES, 

### A PYROCLON (OR 

### SIMILAR TYPE TINIT) 

### AND

### A THERMAL OXIDIZER FOR 

### CONTROL OF CARBON 

### MONOXIDE EMISSIONS, 

### AND 

### A THERMAL OXIDIZER FOR CONTROL OF

### VOC EMISSIONS. THE CONTROLS 

### AND RESULTANT EMISSIONS 

### LIMITATIONS ARE SUCH

### THAT V/E URGE OTHER AGENCIES 

### PERMITTING CEMENT 

### KILNS TO 

### EXAMINE THESE REQUIREMENTS.

Affected Boundaries: 

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 84 o1229



### *Limit (Class 1Area

## or Hercules-Glades Name of the border of the U.S.): Boundary Type (Class 

## 1 CLASSI

or 

### Intl Border): 

## Distance: 320.00 Class 

### I Area

## State: MO 

### *Limit (Class 

### I Area

## or Mingo Name of the border of the U.S.): Boundary Type (Class

# I CLASS1
or 

### Intl Border): 

# Distance: 301.00 Class 1Area

# State: MO

Facility-wide Emissions :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

*Pollutant 

## Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 176.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Nitrogen Oxides 

### (l.lOx) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 2024.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: xPollutant

## Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 320.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 608.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 48.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: ROTARY 

### KILN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 183.00 Throughput

# Unit: TI}J Process

# Notes: Emissions from the rotary 

### kiln and the pyroprocessing system are routed through the samecontrols. Thus, emission 

### limits for the 

### kiln and pyroprocessing system are the same. The pyroprocessing system transforms raw materials into clinker. The clinker is then introduced to the rotary 

### kiln. The pyroprocessing system is fueled 

### with liquid hazardous waste aná coal as backup, 722.4 mmbtu/h. compliance verified 

### by calculations.

Pollutant Information: 

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT 

### COMPANY,LLC - 

### ROTARY 

### KILN

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 85 

### of229

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 99.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### REDUCTION Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method WET SCRUBBER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 12.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIT Emissiirn 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. lb/t clinker, 3-hr 

### rolling avg Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. lbit clinker, 24-ltr 

### rolling avg Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

xPollutant

# Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: B *CONtToI

# Method SELECTIVE 

### NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTION, 

## Low NoX BURNERS, 

# Description: TOP 

### AIR DUCT. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 8.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. lb/t clinker, 30-day 

### rolling avg Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### hltp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestIimeout:500 

### Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

## Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method PYROCLON Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Page 86 

### of229



# : 12.0000 

# Unit: LBIT 

# Avg. lb/t clinker, 

### l-hr rolling avg Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 2

## Unit: LBIT Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. lb/t clinker, 8-hr 

### rolling avg Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: CRUSHING 

### AND TRANSFER, 

### LIMESTONE, UNDERGROUND *Process

# Type: 90.024 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 227.80 Throughput 

# Unit: TÆ{ Process

# Notes: Net emission increase for the project does not xceed the significance level

### for any air pollutant.

Pollutant 

### Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC - CRUSHING 

### AND TRANSFER, 

### LIMESTONE, UNDERGROLIND

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE, 

### MOISTURE 

### > 1.5 yo,

### AND PROCESS 

### LOCATED

. 

# Description: UNDERGROUND Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 99.1900 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### REDUCTION Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. TimeiCondition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT 

### COMPANY,LLC Page 87

### of229

*Process

# Name: QUARRYfNG - 

### SHALE *Process

# Type: 90.023 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 41.50 Throughput 

# Unit: TÆ{ Process

# Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

Pollutant Information: 

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT 

### COMPANY,LLC - 

### QUARRYING - SHALE
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT 

### COMPANY,LLC

*Process

# Name: RAV/ 

### MATEzuAL CRUSHER, SHALE 

### AND CLAY *Process

# Type: 90.024 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 53.10 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process

# Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC - 

### RAw MATERIAL CRUSHER, 

### SHALE 

### AND CLAY

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 99.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: % 

### REDUCTION Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 88 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: ROLLER 

### MILL CRUSHING *Process

# Type: 90.024 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 284.90 Throughput

# Unit: TlÍI

Process

# Notes: Net emission increase less than signif,rcance level.

POIIUtANt INfoTmation: 

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC - ROLLER 

### MILL CRUSHING
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: CLINKER COOLER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 182.60 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process

# Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC - 

### CLINKER 

### CooLER
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM)



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 89

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL, CLINKER GRINDING, ELEVATOR *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 114.20 Throughput

# Unit: T/[I Process 

# Notes: Net emission increase lessthan significance level.

Pollutant 

### Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT 

### COMPANY,LLC - 

### FINISH 

### MILL, CLINKER GRINDING, ELEVATOR

xPollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## l: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Límit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

*Process

# Name: CEMENT 

### HANDLING - 

### BULK RAILCAR 

### LOADING *Process

# Type: 90.028



### http:llcfptb.epa.gov/rblciReports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 191.80 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process

# Notes: Net emission increase lessthan significance level. Page 90 

### of229

Pollutant 

### Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC - 

### CEMENT 

### HANDLING

- 

### BULK RAILCAR LOADING

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE, 

### AND THROUGF{PUT 

### LIMIT Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. TimeiCondition: Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC

*Process 

# Name: HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED FUEL 

### VENT *Process

# Type: 29.900 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 4.60 Throughput

# Unit: TlfI
Process

# Notes: Net emission increase lessthan significance level.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, 

### LLC - 

### HAZARDOUS V/ASTE 

### DERIVED FUEL VENT

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l2}0gFormat 

### RBLC Report



### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page97 

### of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report DaEe:

### tt/zs/zoog Control- Technology 

### Determinat.ions (Freeform)



### Facility Information: CEMEX, fNC.

RBLC ID: AL-0200 

### *Corporate/Company CEMEX,INC. Name: 

### *Facility 

# Name: CEMEX,INC. Facility

# State: AL Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 36732 

### Facility Contact

## Name: MIKE GANDY Facility 

### ContactPhone: 334-284-4400 

### Facility Contact 

## Email: MGANDY@CEMEXUSA.COM Agency

# Name: ALABAMA DEPT OF 

### ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT Agency

# Contact: MR. 

### DALE HURST Agency

# Phone: (334) 271-7882 Agency

# Email: ADH@ADEM.STATE.AL.US NAICS: 3273t0 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0911312002ACT 

### Datedeterminationlast 1211212003 updated: Permit

# Type: B:ADD NEV/ PROCESSTO 

### EXISTING 

### FACILITY C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY 

## FacilityDescription: PORTLANDCEMENTMANUFACUTRING, Other

# Permitting AIRS Facility Number: 01-091-00002 

### CEMEX manufactures portland 

# Information: cement. This

### facility operates one 

### kiln system, controlled by an ESP.



### Facility-wide Emissions :

### CEMEX, INC.

*Pollutant 

## Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 2986. 0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 659.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 560.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information :

### CEMEX, INC.

*Process 

## Name: KILN, CEMENT



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 230.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆI Process Notes: Page 92 

### of229

Pollutant 

### Information: 

### CEMEX,INC. - 

### KILN, CEMENT

*Pollutant 

## Name Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 160.0000



# Unit: LB/H Avg. Time/Condition: Emìssion 

## Limit2: 0.8210 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LB/TON 

### KILN FEED Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code:' N *Control Method 

## ' Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## l: 725.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 3.7200



### . Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBIT EmissionLimit

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 136.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBI}I Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission

# Limit2: 0.6980 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB,IT Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 93 

### of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a 

### " * 

### " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: aa/25/2009 Contro] Technology 

### Determinatj-ons (Freeform)



### Facility Information: 

### LAFARGE CORPORATION



### RBLC 

### ID: IA-0052 

### *Corporate/Company LAFARGECORPORATION Name: 

### *Facility 

# Name: LAFARGE CORPORATION 

### Facility

# State: IA Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 52728 

### Facility 

### ContactName: SCOTTNIELSON Facility Contaòt 

### Phone: (563) 328-6206 

### Facility Contact Email: Agency

# Name: IOWA DEPARTMENT OF 

### NATURAL RESOURCES Agency

# Contact: MR. GARY SMITH Agency 

# Phone: (515) 281-4635 Agency 

# Email: GARY.SMITH@,DNR.STATE.IA.US 

### NAICS: 3273t0 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0710112002 ACT Date determination

# last 0110312003 updated: Permit

# Type: B: 

### ADD NEV/ PROCESS 

### To EXISTING 

### FACILITY C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY Facility Description: OthET

# PETMittiNg THIS PROJECT 

### WAS TO

### ALLOV/ THE SOI-IRCE TO INCREASE THE 

# INfOTmation: CAPACITY OF 

### ITS PREHEATER/PRECALCINER 

### KILN SYSTEM FROM 3O5OTONS OF 

### CLINKER PER 

### DAY TO 3488 TONS OF 

### CLINKER PER 

### DAY. The latest modification was to allow waste

### oil as afuel, to amend the CO 

### BACT 

### limit and to

### write a PSD permit for the clinker cooler which was not permitted under the previous project number 

### (pN 96-464).

Process 

### Information :

### LAFARGE CORPORATION

*PTOCESS

# NAME: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER 

### KILN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 3488.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/D

PTOCESS

# NOTES: COMPLIANCE 

### WILL BE 

### DETERMINED AFTER MODIFICATION. CEM



### http:llcfptú.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page94 

### of229

FOR 

### NOX, SOX 

### AND OPACITY. 

### KILN IS 

### LIMITED TO USING 

### FUEL OIL, 

### NATURAL GAS, 

### COAL, 

### AND COKE AS FUELS. 

### IN 

### ADDITION TO 

### CLAY AND STONE, THE 

### KILN IS 

### ALLOWED TO USE 

### THE FOLLOWING SUPPLEMENTAL 

### MATERIALS IN 

### LIMITED QUANTITIES: COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUE, FOLINDRY 

### BYPRODUCTS, 

### HYDROCARBON CONTAINING SOILS, 

### REFINERY 

### BYPRODUCTS, 

### AND OILS 

### AND GREASES. THERE 

### ARE 

### MULTIPLE POLLUTANT ENTRIES FOR TSP 

### AND SO2 BECAUSE 

### THEY 

### HAVE DIFFERENT BASES FOR 

### THEIR EMISSION 

### LIMITS. STACK TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR TSP, PMIO, CO

### AND D/F.

Pollutant Information: 

### LAFARGE CORPORATION - 

### CEMENT MANUFACTURING, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER 

### KILN

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method DRY SCRUBBER 

### EQUIVALENT-NOT 

### ANADD ON CONTROL. 

### LIME IS 

# Description: GENERATED FROM 

### LIMESTONE 

### IN FEED 

### AND COMES 

### INTO CONTACT 

### WITH SO2

### AND SOME SO2 CAPTURED 

### IN WASTE 

### KILN DUST. A.LTERNATE 

### EMISSION 

### LIMIT IS 

### NAAQS, ALSO 66,500 

### LBiD. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 4850.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: TONS/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides G.fOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2546.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 4.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/TON OF 

### CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### htfp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?R.equestTimeout:500 Tll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 95

### of229

Carbon Monoxide P GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES

4.5000 

### LB/TON OF 

### CLINKER

Dioxins 

### & Furans P GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES

0.4000 

### NG/DSCM

1.7000 E-10 GR/DSCF

*Pollutant 

# Name Total Suspended Particulates 

### *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### (LIMIT INCLUDES CONDENSIBLES). 

### ALTERNATE 

### LIMIT 

# Description: IS PER 

### TON 

### oF FEED

### AND IS 

### BASED 

### oN MACT AND NSPS. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5160 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/TON OF 

### CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: EmisSion 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### Ill25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate mafrer, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### (LIMIT INCLUDES CONDENSIBLES) Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# l: 0.5160 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/TON OF 

### CLINKER Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 96 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LAFARGE CORPORATION

*Process

# Name: CLINKER COOLER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 145.30 Throughput

# Unit: TONS OF 

### CLINKER/H Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: LAFARGE 

### coRPoRATIoN - 

### CLINKER 

### cooLER
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A ICONTTOI 

## Method EXISTING BAGHOUSE. 

### LIMITS INCLUDE CONDENSIBLES. Description:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1: Page97 o1229

Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### *PollutantName *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 0.01s0



# Unit: GR/DSCF 

### Avg.

Particulate malfer, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### A EXISTING BAGHOUSE. 

### LIMITS INCLUDE CONDENSIBLES.

0.0150 GR/DSCF



### Visible Emissions 

### (VE) 

### A EXISTING BAGHOUSE. 

### THE 5% 

### LIMIT IS OVER 

### AN HOUR AVERAGING PERIOD. 5.0000 

### %OPACITY

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " bêside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: 1,1,/25/2009 

### Control Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### 1v25t2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 98

### of229

Facility Information: 

### LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY

RBLC

# ID: MD-0027 

### *Corporate/Company LEHIGHPORTLANDCEMENTCOMPANY Name: 

### *Facility 

# Name: LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY Facility

# State: MD Facility ZIP

# Code: 21791 

### Facility 

### ContactName: DAVID ROUSH 

### Facility Contact 

### Phone: (410)775-1000 

### Facility Contact 

## Email: DROUSH@LEHIGHCEMENT.COM Agency

# Name: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OFTHE 

### ENVIRONMENT Agency

# Contact: MR. 

### V/ILLIAM PAUL Agency

# Phone: (410)537-3230 Agency

# Email: bpaul@mde.state.md.us 

### NAICS: Permit Issuance

# Date: 06/08/2000 

### ACT Date 

### determinationlast 0911812001 updated: Permit

# Type: B:ADD NEW PROCESS TO 

### EXISTING 

### FACILITY C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS 

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY 

## FacilityDescription: PORTLANDCEMENTMANUFACTURINGPLANT Other

# Permitting EPA 

### ID: 24-13-00012. 

### LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT 

### COMpANY'S 

# INfOTmation: UNION BRIDGE 

### MODERNIZATION PROJECT 

### INCLUDES THE 

### INSTALLATION OF

### A 5 STAGE PREHEATER/PRECALCINER PYROPROCESSING 

### UNIT TO REPLACE FOUR 

### EXISTING LONG DRY KILNS. 

### ADDITIONAL PLANT-WIDE EMISSIONS,: 

### LEAD:0.5 T/YR; 

### FLUORIDE:2.0 T/YR

Process 

### Information :

### LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY

*PTocess

# Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER 

### KILN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 2214000.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/YR Process

# Notes: THE PERMITS REQUIRE 

### THE COMPANY TO 

### CONDUCT STACK EMISSIONS TESTS 

### AND OPERATE CEMS FOR 

### COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION. THROUGHPUT IS 

### CLINKER PRODUCT

Pollutant Information: 

### LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT

### coMpANy - CEMENT 

### MANUFACTURING, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER 

### KILN
*Pollutant

# Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N 

## *CONtTOIMEthOd As-STAGEPREHEATERÆRECALCINERPYROPROCESSINGPLANT 

# DESCTiPtiON: IS SELECTED FOR 

### NOX EMISSION 

### ABATEMENT. 

### ANY ADD-ON 

### NOX EMISSIONS CONTROL HAS BEEN 

### DETERMINED TO BE 

### EITHER 

### TECHNICALLY OR 

### ENVI. INFEASIBLE



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 4871.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## l: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description:

Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page99 

### of229

Dioxins 

### & Furans P THE 

### FLUE GAS 

### TEMPERATURE (204 

### C)LIMITATION MEETS THE 

### MACT REQUIREMENT. 0.0110 NG/DSCF

Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) P SO2 

### EMISSION CONTROL OPTIONS 

### INCLUDE THE 

### INSTALLATION OF

### A s-STAGE PREHEATER/PRECALCINER PYROPROCES SING 

### PLANT 

### AND THE USE OF 

### RAV/ 

### MATERIAL V/HICH CONTAINS LESS 

### THAN O.O3%

### SULFUR 1041.0000 

### T/YR

+Pollutant 

## Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1U25t2009Format 

### RBLC Report 

# ' Page 100

### of229

*Control

# Method THE 

### BACT DETERMINED FOR CO 

### IN THIS CASE IS PROCESS 

# Description: MODIFICATIONAND OPERATIONAL MONITORING. 

### ANY ADD ON 

### CONTROL SUCH AS 

### THERMAL OR 

### CATALYTIC OXIDATION IS 

### NOT 

### ENVIRONMENTALLY FEASIBLE. 

### LIMIT IS FOR 

### ANY ROLLING 12 

### MONTH PERIOD 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 3328.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Namê Particulate malter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: B *ContToI

# Method ENCLOSURE, 

### WET SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS 

### AND PAVED ROADS. 

# Description: CONTROL EFFICIENCIES 

### RANGE FROM 60-90% Emission 

### Limit

# l: 96.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR EmissionLimit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 F (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method ALL STACKS ARE EQUIPPED 

### WITH BAGHOUSE TO 

### MEET EMISSION 

# Description: LIMIT. 

### KILN STACK 0.015 GR/SCFD; 

### CLINKER COOLER 

### STACK 0.0129 GR/SCFD; OTHER STACKS 0.01 GR/SCFD Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 620.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 101 

### of229

Frocess 

### Information :

### LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY

*Process

# Name: MATERIAL STORAGE 

### AND TRANSFER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATERIAL STORAGE 

### AND TRANSFER

*Pollutant 

# Name Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control

# Method ANY ADD 

### oN VoC EMISSIONS CONTROLS 

### HAVE BEEN 

# Description: DETERMINED TO BE 

### EITHER 

### TECHNICALLY OR 

### ENVIRONMENTALLY INFEASIBLE. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 165.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. 

# Time/Condition:

: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " besidethe RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: tt/zs/zoog Contro] Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: 

### HOLNAM, INC.



### RBLC 

## ID: Ml-0281 

### *Corporate/Company HOLNAM,INC. Name: 

### *Facility 

## Name: HOLNAM, INC. Facility

## State: MI Facility 

### ZIP

## Code: 48131 

### Facility Contact

## Name: MICHELLE FERGUSON 

### Facility Contact 

### Phone: 734-529-4415 

### Facility Contact Email : Agency

## Name: MICHIGAN DEPT OF 

### ENVIRONMENTAL 

### eUALITY Agency

## Contact: MS. 

### DANITA BRANDT

http:llcþub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page 102

### of229

Agency 

# Phone: (517) 373-7034 Agency 

# Email: BRANDTD@MICHIGAN.GOV NAICS: Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0312012000 ACT Date determination 

# last 0311112002 updated: Permit

# Type: B:ADD NEW PROCESS TO 

### EXISTING 

### FACILITY C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY Facility 

## Description: PORTLAND CEMENT 

### PLANT. Other

# Permitting EPA 

### ID - 

### MID 005038500; AIRS 

### ID -

### MI 0036524; 

### MI SRN: 

### 81743. 

# InfoTmation: ACTUAL START-UP 

### DATE IS 

### NOT

### AVAILABLE. CEMENT 

### PLANT



# . OPERATING SINCE 1960. SINCE

### APPROX.I99O, WET PROCESS 

### CEMENT PLANT HAS BEEN 

### USING CARBON INJECTION FOR 

### THE CONTROL OF ORGANICS. PERMIT 

### MOD 6O-7IL 

### ALLOV/S FOR CESSATION OF 

### CARBON; BAGHOUSES 

### FOLLOV/ED 

### BY SLURRY SCRUBBERS, 

### THEN RTO. THIS 

### POLLUTION CONTROL PROJECT IS 

### NOT SUBJECTTO PSD,

### AND NOT 

### A MAJOR MODIFICATION. THIS 

### PERMIT SOURCE IS

### AUTHORIZED TO 

### BURN TIRE CHIPS, UP TO 

### ABOUT 

### 2I% OF 

### HEAT INPUT, ON

### A PERMANENT BASIS. 

### DURING 

### TRIAL BURNS, 

### UNDER EARLIER PERMIT #60-711, STACK TESTS WERE CONDUCTED 

### AND BECAME 

### A BASIS FOR 

### MUCH OF 

### EMISSION 

### LIMITS HEREIN.



### Facility-wide Emissions :

### HOLNAM, INC.

xPollutant

## Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 3515.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 3377.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 724.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 1 1940.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

## Name: Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 7217.0000 (TonsiYear) Increase:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, INC.

*Process

# Name: CEMENT KILNS, WET PROCESS (2) *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 100.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆ{ FEED PTocess 

# Notes: MOST COMPLIANCE 

### WILL BE 

### DEMONSTRATED 

### BY CEMS.



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page 103

### of229

AGENCY CAN 

### INVOKE STACK TEST. CONVERSION TO 

### PARTIAL TDF IS EXPECTED TO 

### HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON

### TOTAL PM EMISSIONS, PER

### APRIL 1997 TEST BURN.

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, INC. - 

### CEMENT 

### KILNS, V/ET PROCESS (2)

*Pollutant

# Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method SULFUR 

### IN FUEL 

### LIMIT HAS BEEN DROPPED 

### IN FAVOR OF CEMS. 

# Description: EXISTING 

### LIMIT DOES 

### NOT REFLECT 

### ANTICIPATED 85% 

### REDUCTION 

### IN SLURRY-SCRUBBER. CONTROL 

### BY BAGHOUSE, 

### THEN SCRUBBER. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2L7000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/T Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) *Control Method 

### Code: N *ContToI

# Method CURRENT 

### EXISTING 

### LIMIT DOES 

### NOT REFLECT 

### POTENTIAL 30% 

# Description: REMOVAL IN SLURRY-SCRUBBER. SOME 

### GENERATION OF NO2 

### By NATURAL GAS 

### COMBUSTION 

### IN RTOS. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 6.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit:



# . LB,IT Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method 

### Code:

# A / *-ContToI

# Method FABRIC FILTER, SLURRY SCRUBBER, RTO. CURRENT 

### EXISTING DescTiption

# i LIMIT DOES 

### NOT REFLECT 

### ANTICIPATED 75% 

### REDUCTION 

### IN SCRUBBER 

### AND REGENERATIVE 

### THERMAL OXIDIZER. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 6.4000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/T

http:llcþvb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll2S12009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### *PollutantName *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description:

Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emisqion 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Page 104 

### of229

Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) 

### A REGENERATIVE 

### THERMAL OXIDIZERS, THREE 

### IN PARALLEL PER 

### KILN. STANDBY 

### ACTIVATED CARBON FOR 

### BACKUP. CURRENT 

### EXISTING 

### LIMITS DO 

### NOT REFLECT 

### ADDITIONAL 80% 

### REMOVAL ANTICIPATED 

### IN RTOS. 13.0000 

### LBIT

Visible Emissions 

### (VE) 

### A FABRIC FILTER, SLURRY SCRUBBER

1s.0000 % 

### OPACITY

Particulate Matter (PM) 

### A FABRIC FILTER, SLURRY SCRUBBER, 15%

### OPACITY APPLIES. 

### ALTERNATE 

### LrMrT rS 

### rN LB/1000 

### LB GASES @ 6% 

### 02. EXISTTNG



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 105

### of229

LIMITS DO 

### NOT REFLECT 

### ADDITIONAL 90%

### ANTICIPATED PM 

### REMOVAL 

### IN SCRUBBER. Emission 

### Liniit 

# 1: 130.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H EmiSsion 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.1000 Emission 

### Limit 2

## Unit: LB/1000 

### LB @ 6% 

### 02 Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. TimeiCondition: Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence



# . the 

### BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * 

### " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: 1,1,/25/2009 Control- Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: 

### ASH GROVE 

### CEMENT COMPANY

RBLC 

# ID: KS-0020 *Corporate/Company
Name: 

### *Facility 

# Name: ASH GROVE 

### CEMENT COMPANY 

### Facility

# State: KS 

### Facility ZIP

# Code: 66720 

### Facility Contact Name: 

### Facility Contact Phone : 

### Facility Contact Email : Agency

# Name: KANSAS DEPT. OF 

### HEALTH 

### & ENVIRONMENT, BR. OF

### AIR 

### & RADIATION, KS Agency

# Contact: MR. RALPH 

### V/ALDEN Agency 

# Phone: (785)296-1583 Agency 

# Email: RWALDEN(EKDHE.STATE.KS.US NAICS: Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0812611999ACT 

### Datedeterminationlast 0611212001 updated: Permit

# Type: A: NEV//GREENFIELD 

### FACILITY Facility Description: Other Permitting Information:

Process 

### Information :

### ASH GROVE 

### CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: PORTLAND CEMENT 

### PLANT, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER 

### KILN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 331.00



### http:llcþlu;hepa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 106 

### of229

Throughput

# Unit: TI}J Process

# Notes: A NEW PREHEATER/PRECALCINER CEMENT 

### PLANT IS TO 

### BE CONSTRUCTED. PM EMISSIONS 

### NETTED OUT; 

### NOT SUBJECT TO PSD

Pollutant Information: 

### ASH GROVE 

### CEMENT COMPANY - 

### PORTLAND CEMENT 

### PLANT, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER 

### KILN

*Pollutant 

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

# *ControlMethod COMPUTERISEDPROCESS/MONITORINGCONTROLEQUIPMENT 

# Description: WITH EMPLOYEE TRAINING TO 

### IMPLEMENT GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5000.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1409.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen 

### air pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report 

### Date: tt/ZS/zOOg Control- Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE



### RBLC 

# ID: CO-0047 

### *Corporate/Company HOLNAM,FLORENCE Name: 

### *Facility 

# Name: HOLNAM, FLORENCE 

### Facility

# State: CO 

### Facility ZIP

# Code: 81266 

### Facility Contact

## Name: BOB 

### MCGILVRAY Facility Contact 

### Phone: 719-784-6325 

### Facility Contact Email: Agency

# Name: COLORADO DEPT OF 

### HEALTH -

### AIR POLL CTRL Agency

# Contact: JACKIE JOYCE Agency Phone: Agency

# Email: JACKIE.JOYCE@,STATE.CO.US 

### NAICS: Permit Issuance

# Date: 0712911999 ACT Date determination 

## last .0310212004 updated: Permit

# Type: B:

### ADD NEW PROCESS TO 

### EXISTING 

### FACILITY

htfp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 107 

### of229

C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY FACiIity

## DescTiption: PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT - 

### MOD CHANGES WET PROCESS

### To DRY PROCESS. Other

# Permitting CLASS 

### I AREA AFFECTED: GREAT SAND DLTNES - 45 

### MILES. 

### ONLy 

# lNfoTmation: DRAFT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 

### AND PSD 

### PERMITAPPLICATION WAS 

### AVAILABLE FOR 

### ENTRY 

### IN RBLC. 

### MODIFICATION PROPOSES TO REPLACE 

### ALL WET PROCESS 

### KILNSWITH ONE 

### DRY PROCESS CEMENT 

### KILN WITH 

### A s-STAGE PREHEATERÆRECALCINER. 

### MODIFICATION RESULTED 

### IN REDUCTION OF SO2, 

### NOX AND PM. 

### BACT FOR CO 

### ONLY. COLORADO 

### AIR QUALITY COMMISSION.REG. #6 REQUIRES BEST 

### PRACTICAL CONTROL 

### TECHNOLOGY FOR SO2 CONTROL. 

### ESTIMATED START UP 

### DATE HAS BEEN FURTHER 

### DELAYED. NO COMPLIANCE DATE SET.



### Facility-wide Emissions :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE
*Pollutant 

# Name: Carbon Monoxide 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 441 8.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

# Name: Nitrogen Oxides 

### OfOx) Facility-wide 

### Emissions 3204.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

# Name: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 299.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase: *Pollutant 

# Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 1074.0000 (Tons/year) Increase: 

## *PollutantName: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 

### Facility-wide 

### Emissions 197.0000 (Tons/Year) Increase:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: UNLOADING, TRANSFER, 

### coNVEyING RAV/ 

### MAT. & ADD. *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: LTNLOADING, TRANSFER, 

### CONVEYING 

### RAw MATERIALS 

### & ADDITIVES TO TRANSFER TOWER. AIRS 

### ID 104

POIIUtANt INfoTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### LINLOADING, TRANSFER, 

### CONVEYING 

### RAw MAT. 

### & ADD. 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < r0 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A tControl 

## Method BAGHOUSE Description:

http://cfpub 

### .epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 

### Ill25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1600 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Particulate Matter (PM)



### A BAGHOUSE

0.1700 

### T/YR Page 108

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: *Process Type: Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes: 

### RAW MATEzuALS EXTRACTION 90.023

ArRS 

### rD 101 

### (A)

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### RAV/ MATEzuALS EXTRACTION
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code:' P *CONtTOI

# MEthOd MINIMIZE DISTANCE AREA, REVEGETATION, CHEMICAL 

# Description: STABILIZERS Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2.6300 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Page 109

### of229

Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method MINIMIZE DISTANCE AREA, REVEGETATION, 

### CHEMICAL 

## Description: STABILIZERS



# : 1.3200 

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. 

## ' Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: OVERBURDEN 

### AND WASTE ROCK 

### REMOVAL *Process

# Type: 90.023 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 101C

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### OVERBURDEN

### AND WASTE 

### ROCK REMOVAL
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method CONTROL 

### PLAN Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 32.3700 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR EmissionLimit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. TimeiCondition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ITl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report



### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 F (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control 

## Method CONTROL 

### PLAN Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 16.7300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page

## ll0 of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: RAW 

### MATERIAL, REMOVAL 

### AND HAULAGE xProcess

# Type: 90.023 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 101D

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### RAW 

### MATERIAL, REMOVAL AND 

### HAULAGE
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method CONTROL 

### PLAN Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 62.4700 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequçstTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method CONTROL 

### PLAN Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 37.2700 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

# ' Did factors, other then air 

### .pollution technology considerations influence



# . the 

### BACT decisions?: Page

## lll of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT 

### KILN DUST 

### HAULING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 101E

Pollutant Information: 

### HoLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### CEMENT 

### KILN DUST 

### HAULING
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method WETTING 

### MATERIAL PRIOR TO 

### PLACEMENT. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## l: 1.3400 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control 

## Method WETTING 

### MATERIAL PRIOR

### To PLACEMENT.



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2.2300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2.Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 

### 112of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process

# Name: DISTURBED AREAS 

### IN QUARRY 

### AND PLANT *Process

# Type: 90999 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:
PTOCEss

# Notes: MINIMIZATION OFAREAS EXPOSED TO EROSION. AIRS 

### ID 101 F

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### DISTURBED AREAS 

### IN QUARRY AND PLANT
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 167.2100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 83.6100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg.



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 173

### of229

-Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCess

# Name: MATERIAL TRANSFER, 

### HAUL TRUCKS TO PRI CRUSH FEED *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:
PTocess 

# Notes: TRANSFER FROM 

### HAUL TRUCK TO 

### PRIMARY CRUSHER FEED HOPPER. (2)TO BE CONSTRUCTED. 

### AIRS 

### rD 102

POIlutAnt InfoTmation; 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### MATERIAL TR.ANSFER, 

### HAUL TRUCKS TO PRI CRUSH FEED

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: B *COntToI

# Method ENCLOSURE UNDER NEG PRESSURE, 

### DUST CURTAINS, WATER 

# Description: SPRAY, 

### BAGHOUSE 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. transfer 1 Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0200 Ernission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. transfer 2 Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 F

### GPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: B *ContToI

# Method ENCLOSURE LINDER NEG PRESSURE, 

### DUST CURTAINS, WATER 

# Description: SPRAY, 

### BAGHOUSE Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. transfer 1 Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0200



### http.llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 II/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. transfer 2 TimeiCondition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 

### 114of229

Process Inforrnation :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: ROCK CRUSHER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 102 C

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### ROCK CRUSHER
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0500 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. TimeiCondition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0500 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air

http://cfpub 

### .epa'govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

# lIl25l200g

iFormat 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 115

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: *Process Type: Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes: TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING, CRUSHER #1 TO SECOND #1 90.028



### AIRS 

### ID 102 D

POIIutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING. CRUSHER #1

### To SECOND #1
*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Particulate Matter (PM) 

### A BAGHOUSE

0.0100 

### T/YR

Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) 

### A BAGHOUSE

0.0100 

### T/YR

http://cfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 116 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

+Process

# Name: SECONDARY CRUSHER #1 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 102 E

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE 

### - SECONDARY CRUSHER

### #l

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, hlterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: TiYR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process

# Name: PzuMARY CRUSHER #2



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: TO 

### BE CONSTRUCTED 

### AIRS 

### ID 102 F Page 117

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### PRIMARY CRUSHER #2
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.9100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg, Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology' considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMlO) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.9100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: TRANSFER 

### & coNVEyING, sECoNDARy CRUSHER #1 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:



### http:llcfE:b.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeouF500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC'Report Page 118 

### of229

PTocess

# Notes: TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING SECONDARY CRUSHER #1 TO THE PRE

### BLENDING 

### HAUL. AIRS 

### ID 102 G.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING, SECONDARY CRUSHER #1
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.1000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: TiYR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate mafter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.1000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology ' considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCESS

# NAME: TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING, PRELIM CRUSH 

### #2TO PRE-BLEND *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCCSS

# NOTES: TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING FROM 

### PRELIMINARY CRUSHER #2TO 

### PRE-BLENDING 

### HALL. TO BE CONSTRUCTED. 

### AIRS 

### ID 102 H.



### http://cfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 119

### of229

POIIutant InfoTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING, PRELIM CRUSH #2 TO 

### PRE-BLEND

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2800 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 Lr

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2700 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: PRE-BLENDING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTES: STACKER 

### BELT, RECLAIMER, CONVEYORS, 

### ALL ENCLOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED AIRS 

### ID 102 

### K

http://cfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### PRE-BLENDING Page 120

### of229

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2500 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# l: 0.2500 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: RAw MATEzuALS CONVEYING, 

### RAw MILL FEED 

### BINS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTES: RAW 

### MATERIALS CONVEYING - 

### RAV/ 

### MILL FEED 

### BINS TO TRANSFER TOV/ER. TRANSFER ACROSS THE 

### RIVER. AIRS 

### ID 102 L.

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### RAW 

### MATERIALS CONVEYING, 

### RAw MILL FEED 

### BINS



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2 Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: TiYR Emission 

### Lirnit I Avg. i_. lrme/Condrtron: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page

## l2I of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: UNLOADING 

### & CONVEYING, COAL TO STOCKPILE *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 103

### A. PM EMISSIONS 

### NOT SUBJECT TO 

### BACT ANALYSIS, STANDARD EMISSON UNITS 

### NOT

### AVAILABLE.

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -

### TINLOADING 

### & CONVEYING, COAL TO STOCKPILE 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter,hlterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page 122

### of229

*CONtToI

# Method NEG PRESSURE 

### AND BAGHOUSE. STANDARD EMISSION UNITS 

# Description: NOT 

### AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

# l: 1.8500 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *CONtToI

# Method NEG PRESSURE 

### AND BAGHOUSE. STANDARD EMISSION UNITS 

# Description: NOT

### AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 1.9400



## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: COAL STOCKPILE *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes:

Pollutant 

### Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### COAL STOCKPILE
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method SUR_FACE 

### MOISTURE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.4500 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/yR

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method SURFACE 

### MOISTURE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## l: 0.3300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, othei then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 123

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCEss

# Name: RECLAIMING, CONVEYING, 

### & TRANS COAL TO 

### COAL SCREEN *Process

# Tlpe: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:
PTocess 

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 103 C. 

### PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TzuGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION TINITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### RECLAIMING, CONVEYING, 

### & TRANS 

### COAL TO 

### COAL SCREEN
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContTol

# Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW 

# DESCTiption: OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS 

### NoT AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### Ill25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 124 

### of229

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContTol

# Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW 

# Description: OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS 

### IN STANDARD EMISSION TINITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process

# Name: SCREENING 

### AND CRUSHING OVERSIZE COAL *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:
PTocess

# Notes: PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW OF 

### Co ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS 

### IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS 

### NOT

### AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANI INfOTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE 

### - SCREENING 

### AND CRUSHING 

### OVERSIZE 

## C)AL
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code:A *COntToI

# Method BAGHOUSE. 

### PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW 

# DESCTiPtiON: OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS 

### IN STANDARD EMISSION LINITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE, Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Urrit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg.



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 125

### of229

Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContToI

# Method BAGHOUSE. 

### PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TzuGGERED 

### BACT 

### REVIEw 

# DEscTiption: OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS.IN STANDARD EMISSION LINITS 

### NoT AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2 Emission 

### Limit 2IJnit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCESS

# NAME: TRANS 

### & CONVEYING - CRUSHED 

### COAL TO TRANSFER TOWER *Process

# Type: 90.01I Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOtESi AIRS 

### ID 103 E. 

### PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION I-INITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANt INfOrmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -TRANS 

### & CONVEYING - CRUSHED 

### COAL

### To TRANSFER TOWER

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *CONtTOI 

## MEthOd BAGHOUSE. 

### PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW 

## DESCTiPtiON: OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: T/yR

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 126

### of229

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 Lr(FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContToI

# Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW 

# Description: OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS 

### IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: TRANSFER, 

### COAL, TRANSFER TOV/ER 

### TO SILO *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:
PTocess

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 105. 

### PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS 

### IN STANDARD EMISSION LTNITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -TRANSFER, 

### COAL, TRANSFER TOWER 

### To SILO
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code:A *COntToI

# Method BAGHOUSE. 

### PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW 

# DescTiption: OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS 

### IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS 

### NoT

AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR.



### http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 127 

### of229

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE. 

### PERMIT 

### MODIFICATION TRIGGERED 

### BACT REVIEW 

## DescTiption: OF CO 

### ONLY. PM 

### LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION TINITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE.. Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING, RAW 

### MATERIAL *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: PTocess 

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 106. TRANSFER OF 

### RAW 

### MATERIAL FROM TRANSFER TOWER TO 

### RAW 

### MILL.

POIlutAnt InfoTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER 

### & CONVEYING, RAW 

### MATERIAL
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.2300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air



# . pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Timê/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 128 

### of229



# : 0.2200 

## Unit: T/YR

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process

# Name: COAL 

### MILL VENT BAGHOUSE *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTES: HOT GASES 

### FROM PRECALCINER 

### VENTS THROUGH COAL GRINDER FOR 

### DRYING. AIRS 

### ID 107. PM EMISSIONS 

### NOT SUBJECT TO 

### BACT 

### ANALYSIS, STANDARD EMISSON T]NITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE.

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -

### coAL MILL VENT 

### BAGHousE
*Pollutant 

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 358.9000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### *PollutantName *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Page 129

### of229

Particulate Matter (PM) 

### A BAGHOUSE. PM EMISSIONS 

### NOT SUBJECT TO 

### BACT ANALYSIS, STANDARD EMISSON UNITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE. t4.4000 

### T/YR

Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FPM10) 

### A BAGHOUSE. PM EMISSIONS 

### NOT SUBJECT TO 

### BACT ANALYSIS, STANDARD EMISSON UNITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE. 14.4400 

### T/YR

Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox) P 

### LOW NOX BURNER

263.0000 

### TIY

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### tU25t2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:


### *PollutantName *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Page 130

### of229

Sultur Dioxide (SO2) 

### N OVERALL 

### FACILITY SO2 CONTROL 

### ABOVE 80% SATISFIES BEST 

### PRACTICAL CONTROL 

### REQUIREMENT. 448.6000 

### T/YR

Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) P GOOD 

### COMBUSTION

16.2000 

### T/YR Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Unit:

Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: *Process Type: Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes: 

### RAW 

### MILL SYSTEM 90.028

AIRS 

### ID 108



### http:l/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 131

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### RAV/ 

### MILL SYSTEM


### tPollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 6.1700 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 6.1700 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: TRANSFER, 

### MILLED 

### RAw MEAL 

### To BLENDING 

### sILo *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 109

Psllutant 

### Information: 

### HoLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER, 

### MILLED 

### RAw MEAL 

### To BLENDING SILO



### http:l/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 IIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report



# *PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 3.8600 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considelations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 3.8600 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 732 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: TRANSFER, 

### BLENDING 

### sILo 

## ro KILN FEED 

### BIN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 110

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -TRANSFER, 

### BLENDING SILO 

### To KILN FEED 

### BIN

*Pollutant 

## Name ' Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOUSE



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 1.5400 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 1.5400 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 133 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCESS

# NAME: KILN/PREHEATER/BYPASS 

### & CLINKER COOLER 

### EXHAUST *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary

# Fuel: COAL Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTCS: OTHER FUELS: TDF 

### AND NATURAL GAS. 

### LIMITS TAKEN FROM 

### DRAFT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. 

### AIRS 

### ID 11I. PM EMISSIONS 

### NOT SUBJECT TO 

### BACT 

### ANALYSIS, STANDARD EMISSON 

### IINITS NOT 

### AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANt INfOTmation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### KILN/PREHEATER/BYPASS 

### & CLINKER COOLER 

### EXHAUST

*Pollutant 

## Name Total Suspended Particulates *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOLISE



### htÍp.llcfpttb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 132.1000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: TÆR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method 132.1 000 

### T/YR

Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) 

### A BAGHOUSE Page 734 

### of229

Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox)
P 

### LOW 

### NOX COMBUSTION SYSTEM



### 2922.7t00 

### T/YR

Carbon Monoxide P GOOD 

### COMBUSTION



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen.air 

### pollution teclùology considerations infl uence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: 

### 'Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit F.mission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 135

### of229

3988.7000 

### T/YR

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 

### A WET 

### LIME SCRUBBER

623.2300 

### T/YR

Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC)
P GOOD 

### COMBUSTION

180.5000 

### TiYR

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 136

### of229

*Process

# Name: CEMENT CLINKER COOLER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### lD 

## ll2. PM EMISSIONS 

### NOT SUBJECTTO 

### BACT ANALYSIS, STANDARD EMISSON LINITS 

### NOT

### AVAILABLE.

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### CEMENT CLINKER COOLER
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *ContToI

# Method BAGHOUSE. PM EMISSIONS 

### NOT SUBJECT TO 

### BACT ANALYSIS 

# Description: STANDARD EMISSON LINITS 

### NOT

### AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

# l: 60.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *CONtTOI 

## Method BAGHOUSE. PM EMISSIONS 

### NOT SUBJECTTO 

### BACT ANALYSIS 

## Description: STANDARD EMISSON UNITS 

### NOT 

### AVAILABLE. Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 60.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process

# Name: CEMENT CLINKER STORAGE 

### & HANDLING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary'Fuel:



### http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll2Sl200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 113 Page 137

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### CEMENT CLINKER STORAGE 

### & HANDLING

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.0700 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0700 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process

# Name: TRANSFER, 

### CLINKER TO 

### CEMENT FINISH 

### MILL BINS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID Ll4

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page 138

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -TRANSFER, 

### CLINKER TO 

### CEMENT FINISH 

### MILL BINS

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0800 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0900 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### þollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:


# ' Process 

### Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE

+Process 

# Name: FINISH 

### MILL SYSTE *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: MILL #1 -AIRS 

### ID 1 15

### A. 

### MILL #2 -AIRS 

### ID 1 15 B. 

### MILL #3 -AIRS 

### ID 115 C:TO BE CONSTRUCTED

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### FINISH 

### MILL SYSTEM



### http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## 1: 70.7800 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 70.7800 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology ' considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 139 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: TRANSFER, 

### CEMENT TO 

### CEMENT SILOS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 116

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE -TRANSFER, 

### CEMENT TO 

### CEMENT SILOS 

## *PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE Description:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2.5500 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, hlterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2.5400 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 140

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process

# Name: MATERIAL HANDLING, CEMENT 

### PACKHOUSE *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID

## ll7

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### MATERIAL HANDLING, CEMENT PACKHOUSE

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.1300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### *PollutantName *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 141

### of229

Pârticulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### A BAGHOUSE

0. I300 

### T/YR

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: *Process Type: Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes: 

### MATERIAL HANDLING; CEMENT 

### BULK LOADOUTS 90.028



### AIRS 

### ID 1 18

Pollutant Information: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### MATERIAL HANDLING, CEMENT 

### BULK LOADOUTS

*PollutantName *Control Method Code: *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## l: Particulate Matter (PM)



### A BAGHOUSE

Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit2 Emission 

### Limit2 2.5800



# Unit: T/YR Avg.

Unit: Arrg.



### http:lbfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPMIO) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 2.4600 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 142

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process 

# Name: PAVED ROADS, CEMENT PRODUCT 

### HAULOUT *Process

# Type: 99.140 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 119

POIIUtANt INfO[mation: 

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### PAVED ROADS, 

### CEMENT PRODUCT 

### HAULOUT
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate 

### Matter (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method CONTROL 

### PLAN Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 1.6000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: T/yR



# , Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence



### http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1 

### Il25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 Lr(FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control 

# Method CONTROL 

### PLAN Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 1.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 143 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process

# Name: DRILLING AND BLASTING *Process

# Type: 90,023 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: AIRS 

### ID 1018

Pollutant Information: 

### HoLNAM, FLORENCE - 

### DRILLING AND BLASTING
*Pollutant 

## Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 70.6000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

## Name Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox) *Control Method 

### Code: N



### http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### Ill25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: 

### EmissionLimit 1: Page 144

### of229

Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 17.9000 

### T/YR

Particulate Matter (PM) 

### N

1.3500 

### TÆR

Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 Lr(FPM10) 

### A

0.7000 

### T/YR Unit: Avg.

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a 

### " * 

### " beside the RBLC ID.



### http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report



### Report 

### Date: tt/zs/zoog Page 145 

### of229

Control- Technology 

### Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.



### RBLC

# ID: IN-0081 

### *Corporate/Company LONESTARINDUSTRIES,INC. Name: 

### *Facility

# Name: LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC. Facility

# State: IN Facility

### ZIP

# Code: 46135 

### Facility Contact Name: 

### Facility Contact Phone: 

### Facility Contact Email: Agency

# Name: INDIANA DEPT OF 

### ENV 

### MGMT, OFC OF

### AIR Agency

# Contact: MR. 

### MACK SIMS Agency

# Phone: (317)233-0567 Agency Email: 

# NAICS: 327310 Permit Issuance 

# Date: 0411611999 ACT Date

### determinationlast 0311012004 updated: Permit

# Type: B: 

### ADD NEV/ PROCESS

### To EXISTING 

### FACILITY C: 

### MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS 

### AT EXISTING 

### FACILITY Facility Description: Other

# Permitting THIS 

### PERMIT SUPERCEDES PREVIOUS pSD 

### APpROVALS (Cp-133- 

# ' Information: 5836). THE PROPOSED PROJECT FOR Cp-133-5886 

### wAS NBVBR CONSTRUCTED. 

### THE COMPANY IS 

### MODIFYING THE 

### EXISTING DRY PROCESS 

### KILN (2600 TONS 

### CLINKER/DAY TO

### A SEMI-DRY pRocESS 

### KrLN (4400 TONS 

### CLINKER/DAY). THrS SOURCE 

### MODIFICATION FOR 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC., RELATES TO THE 

### MODIFICATION OF 

### THE WET PROCESS 

### CEMENT 

### KILN u¡ITH

### A CLINKER PRODUCTION 

### CAPACITY OF 2600 TONS PER 

### DAY TO

### A SEMI-DRY PROCESS 

### CEMENT 

### KILN WITH 

### A CLINKER PRODUCTION 

### CAPACITY OF 44OOTONS PER 

### DAY AND ITS 

### ASSOCIATED OPERATIONS.

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC.

*Process

# Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, COAL 

### MILL *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 40.00 Throughput 

# Unit: T/YR Process

# Notes: THROUGHPUT 

### IN TONS 

### oF 

### coAL pER 

### HouR, ALSO 313,550 TONS/YR, 

### EMISSION POINT FF 2-11

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC. - 

### CEMENT MANUFACTURING, COAL 

### MILL

http:/lcþub'epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### IIl25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 

### I Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name 

### *Control Method Code: 

### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 1: Emission 

### Limit 1 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 146

### of229

Visible Emissions 

### (VE) 

### A FABzuC FILTER

10.0000 % 

### OPACITY

Particulate maiíeÍ, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) 

### A FABRIC FILTER

0.0100 GRiDSCF

4.4500 

### LB/H

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES,INC.

*Process Name: *Process Type: Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes: 

### CEMENT MANUFACTURING, 

### KILN OPERATION 90.028 

### COAL 360.00 

## TIfI oNE HAMMERMILL DRYER, ONE 

### CALCINER TOV/ER (451 

### MMBTU/HR), 

### AND SEMr-DRY PROCESS 

### KrLN (376 

### MMBTU/HR) 

### AND BYPASS SYSTEM. THROUGHPUT 

### IN TONS 

### RAW FEED PER HOUR, 

### ALSO 183 TONS 

### CLINKER/HR SO2, 

### NOX, 

### AND CO EMISSIONS DECREASE AS 

### A RESULT OF THIS 

### MODIFICATION FROM 

### A WET 

### KILN TO

### A SEMI-DRY 

### KILN.

POIIUtANt INfoTmation: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC. - 

### CEMENT MANUFACTURING, 

### KILN

htlp:/lcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

OPERATION Page747

### of229

*Pollutant

## Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method ESP Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 20.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 0.3000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBiT Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method ESP Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0140 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 88.7000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unt: LBÆ{ Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then 

### air pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### (FpM) *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control 

## Method ESP Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0160 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 91.3000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Untt: LB/II Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, bther then air pollution technology considerations influence



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 148

### of229

the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 3317.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: TiYR Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/MMBTU Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Póllutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides 

### (NOx) *Control Method 

### Code: P *CONtTOI 

# MEthOd LOV/NOX CALCINER, GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 4428.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 5.4700 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBÆ Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. clinker Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2930.0000 Emission 

### Limit I

## Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 3.6500

, Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBÆ Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. clinker Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology -considerations influence



### hup://cfpub.epa'gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 149

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES,INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG., 

### ALKALI BYPASS DUST TRANSFER EQUIP *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: EMISSION POINTS BE 3-6, BE 3-8.

POIIutant InfoTmation: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC. - CEMENT MFG., 

### ALKALI BYPASS DUST TRANSFER EQUIP

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### .*Control

# Method BUILDING ENCLOSURE Description: ' Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG.,

### ALKALI BYPASS DUST BINS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: EMISSION POINT FF 3-7

POIIutAnt InfoTmation: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC. - 

### CEMENT MFG., 

### ALKALI BYPASS DUST BINS 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.6400 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBÆ{ Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then 

### air ' 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 150 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG., 

### CLINKER COOLER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 183.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIII

PTOCESS

# NOTES: THROUGHPUT 

### IN TONS 

### CLINKER PER HOUR. 

### EMISSION POINT FF 3-e 

### (srACK3-2).

POIIUtANt INfoTmation: 

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., 

### CLINKER 

### CooLER
*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate mafter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 7.2500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 151

### of229

Pt'ocess 

### Information :

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG., 

### CLINKER 

### CooLER TRANSFER 

### EeUIPMENT *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 183.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H

PTOCESS

# NOTCS: THROUGHPUT 

### IN TONS 

### CLINKER PER HOUR. EMISSION POINTS FF 

### 3- 11, FF 3-12.

POIIutAnt InfoTmation: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC. - 

### CEMENT MFG., CLINKER 

### CooLER TRANSFER 

### EQUIPMENT

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Particulate 

### matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 1.1200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. TOTAL OF FF3-11 

### AND FF3-12 Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 152

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG., CLINKER STORAGE SILOS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Piimary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: EMISSION POINT FF 3-14.

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: 

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT 

### MFG., CLINKER STORAGE SILOS 

# *PollutantName Particulate matler, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.5900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H 

### Emissiontimit2Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE, 

### ALT EMISSION 

### LIMIT LB/TON FEED 

### (DRy) Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.3000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LBIT Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 153

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG., 

### FINISH 

### MILL, NO. 3 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 95.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIIJ Process

# Notes: Nol AND NO2 FINUSH 

### MILLS ARE EXISTING FACILITIES AND ARE NOT BEING MODIFIED AS 

### A RESULT OF THIS 

### MODIFICATION. THROUGH PUT IS TONS 

### CLINKER PER HOUR. NO.3 

### FINISH 

### MILL EMISSION POINTS: FF4-9.

POIIUtANt INfOTmation: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC. - 

### CEMENT MFG., 

### FINISH 

### MILL, 

### No. 3 *Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.9700 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method ENCLOSURES 

### ANDioR WATER MIST SUPPRESSION Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY .Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 154 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC.

+Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG., 

### FINISH 

### MILL TRANSFER 

### EeUIPMENT *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 235.00. Throughput

# Unit: TPH
PTOCESS

# NOTES: THROUGHPUT IS TONS 

### CLINKER PER HOUR. 

### EMISSION POINTS FF 

### 4- g, FF 3-19, FF 3-20, FF 4-10, 

### FF

### 4-ll,FF 4-12.

Pollutant 

### Information: 

### LoNE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., 

### FINISH 

### MILL TRANSFER 

### EQUIPMENT

*Pollutant 

## Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. EMISSION POINTS FF4-8 

### AND FF3-19 Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. FF3-20, FF4-10, 

### FF4-1l,FF4-12 Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other therr air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 155 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT 

### MFG., CEMENT STORAGE SILOS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 235.00 Throughput

# lJnit: TIH

PTOCESS

# NOTES: THROUGHPUT 

### IN TONS 

### CEMENT PER 

### HOUR. SILOS COMPRISE OF FOUR GROUPS. GROUP 2 SILOS (1-11)

### WITH STORAGE 

### CAPACITY OF 24842 TONS, GROUP 3 SILOS (T-12) 

### WITH STORAGE 

### CAPACITY 

### oF 29763 TONS, 

### cROUp 4 SILOS (701A-704A) 

### V/rTH STORAGE 

### CAPACITY OF 18892TONS,

### AND GROUP 5

### SIOS (705A-7IOA) WITH STORAGE 

### CAPACITY OF 60462 TONS.

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: 

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., 

### CEMENT STORAGE SILOS 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *control

# Method FABRIC FILTER. PMlO

# : TorAL FILTERABLE 

### pM Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emisgion 

### Limit 1

# Avg. GROUP 5

### SLOS Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. GROUP 2,3,4 SILOS Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 156

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURE, 

### PRIMARY CRUSHER *Process

# Type: 90.024 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 1300.00 Throughput

# Unit: TIH Process

# Notes: THROUGHPUT IS TONS 

### LIMESTONE PER HOUR. 

### ADDITIONAL 

### LIMIT 2,262,500 TONS/YR. 

### EMISSION POINT 1-8. 

### COMPLIANCENOT VERIFIED AS OF 717199

Pollutant Information: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC. - 

### CEMENT MANUFACTURE, 

### PRIMARY CRUSHER

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method WATER SPRAY SUPPRESSION Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 15.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit'1 Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG., 

### RAV/ 

### MATERIAL SIZING TRANSFER EQUIP *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: EMISSION POINTS 1-9

### AND 1-11.

### VE 

### limit only for this process.

Pollutant Information: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, 

### INC. - 

### CEMENT MFG., 

### RAW 

### MATEzuAL SIZING TRANSFER EQUIP

*Pollutant

## Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A

http:i/cfpub 

### .epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report



### *Control

# Method WATER 

### MIST SUPPRESSION Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

## 1-Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Pagel5T of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT 

### MANUFACTURING, SECONDARY CRUSHER *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 400.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/H
PTOCess 

# Notes: THROUGHPUT IS T 

### LIMESTONEiH ALSO 

### LIMITED TO 2,705,800 

### T/YR, EMISSION POINT 

### FF 1-15

Pollutant Information: 

### LONE STAR INDUSTzuES, 

### INC. - CEMENT 

### MANUFACTURING, SECONDARY CRUSHER 

# *PollutantName Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 7.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.1200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE. PM10

# : TOTAL FILTERABLE 

### pM Description:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill.istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.6000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 158 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES,INC.

*PTOCEss

# Name: CEMENT 

### MANUFACTURING, 

### BALL MILL TRANSFER 

### EQUIPMENT *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 360.00 Throughput

# Unit: TÆ{ Process

# Notes: THROUGHPUT TONS 

### RAW 

### MATEzuAL PER HOUR, 

### ALSO 

### LIMITED TO 2,705,800 TONS/YR. EMISSION 

### POINTS 1-9

### AND FF 1-11.

Pollutant Information: 

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC. -

### CEMENT MANUFACTURING, 

### BALL 

### MILL TRANSFER 

### EQUIPMENT

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2 

### Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 F 

### GPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE. 

### PM10: TOTAL FILTERABLE PM Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: GR/DSCF



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. 

### TimeiCondition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.0800 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 159 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT 

### MANUFACTURING, FLY ASH SILOS *Process

# Type: 99.120 Primary Fuel: 

# Throughput: 135300.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/YR
PTOCCss

# Notes: THROUGHPUT 

### IN TONS 

### FLY ASH PER 

### YEAR, EMISSION POINT 

### FF 1- 

### 2t.

Pollutant Information: 

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT 

### MANUFACTURING, FLY ASH SILOS

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2Unít: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Conditiorr: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matteÍ,hlterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE. PM10

# : TOTAL FILTERABLE PM Description: 

### EmisSionLimit 

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission

# Limit2: 0.2200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 160 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES,INC.

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT MFG., 

### FINISH 

### MILL TRANSFER, NO.3 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:
PTocess 

# Notes: NO.l AND NO.2 

### FINISH 

### MILLS ARE 

### EXISTING FACILITIES AND ARE NOT BEING MODIFIED AS

### A RESULT OF THIS 

### MODIFICATION. THROUGHPUT IS TONS 

### CLINKER PER HOUR. NO.3 

### FINISH 

### MILL TRANSFER 

### EMISSION POINTS: FF4-8, FF3-19, FF3-20, FF4-10, FF4-11, FF4-T2.

Pollutant Information: 

### LONE STAR 

### INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., 

### FINISH 

### MILL TRANSFER, NO.3

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0150 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. FF4-8, FF3-19 Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: GR/DSCF Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. FF3-20, FF4-10, 

### FF4-1l,FF4-12 TimeiCondition: Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology



# . considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method FABRIC FILTER Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg.



### http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 161

### of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a

### " * 

### " beside the RBLC ID. 

### Report DaLe:

### tl-/ZS/ZOO9 Contro1 Technology 

### Determinat.ions (Freeform)

Facility Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

RBLC

# ID: TX-0279 

### *Corporate/Company NORTIITEXASCEMENTCOMPANY Name: 

### *Facility 

# Name: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY Facility

# State: TX Facility 

### ZIP

# Code: 760650520 

### Facility Contact

## Name: RONNIE T. 

### BEALL Facility Contact Phone: 

### Facility Contact Email: Agency

# Name: TEXAS COMMISSION ON 

### ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ) Agency

# Contact: RANDY 

### HAMILT Agency

# Phone: (512) 239-1512 Agency

# Email: RHAMILTO@TCEQ.STATE.TX.US NAICS: 327310 Permit Issuance

# Date: 0310411999ACT 

### Datedeterminationlast 0110412005 updated: Permit

# Type: A: NEV/iGREENFIELD 

### FACILITY Facility 

## Description: PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 

### A NE\M 

### PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING 

### FACILITY DESIGNED TO PRODUCE 31OOTONS OF 

### CLINKER PER 

### DAY. THE 

### FACILITY IS 

### A MAJOR SOURCE FOR PMIO, 

### NOX, CO, SO2, 

### AND VOC. Other Permitting lnformation:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

tProcess

# Name: SHIFTABLE QUARRY BELT DROP 

### POINT *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:
PTocess

# Notes: MINING OPERATIONS 

### LIMITED TO 16 

### HR/DAY. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS.



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lllZ5l2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 162

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT

### coMPANy - 

### SHIFTABLE QUARRY BELT DROP 

### POINT

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control 

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND spRAyING. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBÆ{ Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.8600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiyR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations infl uence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMlO) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control 

# Method PATIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND spRAyING. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2900 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.8600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: p *control 

# Method PARTIAL ENCLosuRE AND spRAyING. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 163 

### of229

. Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: QUARRY BELT DROP 

### POINT (FUTURE) *Process

# Typê: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTES: MINING OPERATIONS 

### LIMITED TO 16 

### HR/DAY. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS.

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT

### coMpANy -

### QUARRY BELT DROP 

### POINT (FUTURE)

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method COVERED 

### AND SPRAYED Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.2900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.g600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method COVERED 

### AND SPRAYED Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2900 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.g600 

### EmissionLimit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology



### http:/lcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED 

### AND SPRAYED Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 164 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS

# NAME: QUARRY CONVEYOR BELT TO 

### LIMESTONE STORAGE DROP PT. *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTES: MINING OPERATIONS 

### LIMITED TO 16 

### HR/DAY. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS.

Pcillutant Information: 

### NoRTH TEXAS CEMENT 

### coMpANy -

### QUARRY CONVEYOR BELT TO 

### LIMESTONE STORAGE DROP PT.
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method COVERED 

### AND SPRAYED Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2900 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB,IH Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http:llcfpub'epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Il/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method SPRAYED 

### AND COVERED Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.2900 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB,IH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.8600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED 

### AND SPRAYED Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 2IJnit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 165 o1229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY
*Process

# Name: MOBILE CRUSHER *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTES: NOT TO BE 

### LOCATED 

### WITHIN 492 FEET OF 

### RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY 

### LINE. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS.

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT

### coMpANy - 

### MOBILE CRUSHER *Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: N

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBIC Report



### *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.6500 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 1.9000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.6500 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 1.9000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit I

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 166

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY



### hnp://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page 167

### of229

*Process 

# Name: RAV/ 

### MATEzuAL HOppER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANI INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### RAW 

### MATEzuAL HOPPER 

### tPollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1800 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.8000 Emission 

### Limit

# 2Untt T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations infl uence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAÇHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.1800 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBÆI Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.8000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY



### http:llcþub.epa.govhblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 168

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: RAW 

### MATERIAL STORAGE 

### BINS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACKS 

### I 8.2

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### RAV/ 

### MATEzuAL STORAGE BINS *Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.6900 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. EACH Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.9600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. EACH Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 

### p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

# ' Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.6800 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBiH Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. EACH Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.9600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lI/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. EACH Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A xControl

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 169

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: RAW 

### MATERIAL FEED 

### BIN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### RAW 

### MATERIAL FEED 

### BIN
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.2500 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBÆ{ Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.1100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR EmissionLimit

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology



### http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:.

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 Fr

### (FpMlO) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2500 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.1100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 170

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: RAW 

### MATERIAL CONVEYOR TRANSFER *'Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### RAV/ 

### MATERIAL CONVEYOR TRANSFER



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.3900 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBÆ{ Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: L7200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.3900 Emission 

### Limit 

## I 

## Unit: LB Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: L7200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TIY Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A 

# ' *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 

## I7l of229

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 

### lV2 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: MAIN KILN/SCRUBBER STACK *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary 

# Fuel: COAL 

# Throughput: 3100.00 Throughput

# Unit: T/D 

### CLINKER Process

# Notes: ADDITIONAL FUEL: 

### PETROLEUM 

### coKE. A 

### LIMIT oN THE 

### POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 

### IN THE 

### PETROLEUM COKE OF 

### < lo/o

### V/T CONC.

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT 

### COMPANY - 

### MAIN KILN/SCRUBBER STACK
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method SCRUBBER 

### AND BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 28.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. FRONT-HALF, FED 

### COMPLIANCE Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 123.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. FRONT-HALF, FED 

### COMPLIANCE Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method SCRUBBER 

### AND BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 28.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. FRONT-HALF, FED 

### COMPLIANCE TimeiCondition: Emission

# Limit2: 123.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. FRONT-HALF, FED 

### COMPLIANCE Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: B

http://cfpub 

### .epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report Page 173

### of229

*CONtTol 

# Method SEPARATE 

### LINE DOWNDRAFT LOVI-NOX CALCINER AND LOW- 

# Description: NOX 

### IN-LINE CALCINER. Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 1085.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1585.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Sulfur 

### Dioxide (SO2) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

# Method SCRUBBER 

### AND BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2840.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1577.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Carbon Monoxide 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2209.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 3225.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Volatile Organic Compounds 

### (VOC) *Control Method 

### Code: P



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl2Sl200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Control 

# Method GOOD 

### COMBUSTION PRACTICES. Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 686.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition:' Emission

# Limit2: 1008.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Sulfuric 

### Acid (mist, vapors, etc) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method SCRUBBER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 190.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 187.0000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/.YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTF AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 774

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY



### http://cþub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page 175 

### of229

*Process

# Name: BLENDING SILO 

### DEDUSTING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### BLENDING SILO 

### DEDUSTING
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 02200 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBiH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matrer, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# l: 0.2200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBiH Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY



### http,,llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 176

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process

# Name: FEED 

### BIN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - FEED 

### BIN

*Pollutant

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 0.2000



# Unit: LBIH Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 0.8600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 0.8600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2IJnit: T/YR

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

. *Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 177

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*ProcesS

# Name: PREHEATER FEED *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT 

### CoMpANy - PREHEATER FEED
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.8900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l}00gFormat 

### RBLC Report

considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate malter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.2000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBI}I Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.8900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 178 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: BLENDING SILO *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: MA.IN 

### BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT

### CoMpANy - 

### BLENDING SILO
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 0.0600



# Unit: LBIII Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.2800 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence

rthe 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 F

### GpMl0)

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0600 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.2800 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 179

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: CLINKER CONVEYOR 

### NO. 1 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CLINKER CONVEYOR 

### NO. 1 *Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5100



### http://cþub..epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 11125/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.2200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unir: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.2200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Descriptioni Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limít2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 180 o1229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

+Process 

# Name: CLINKER CONVEYOR NO. 2 *Process

# Type: 90.028



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK Page 181

### of229

POIIUtANt Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CLINKER CONVEYOR 

### No. 2 

# ' *Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: B *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### AND COVERED 

### CONVEYOR Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2.1500 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 9.4200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *control

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### AND 

### covERED 

### coNVEyoR Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 2.1500 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 9.4200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *control

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### AND 

### covERED 

### coNVEyoR Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit I

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE 

# Time/Condition:

, Emission 

### Limit2:

http://cfpub.epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields,cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 182

### of229

Process 

### Information 

### :NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

+Process

# Name: CLINKER CONVEYOR

### AND BIN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes:

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CLINKER CONVEYOR 

### AND 

### BIN
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: 

### A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.6700 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.9rc0 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiYR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 F (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.6700 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBÆ{ Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 29100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U



### http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

## Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

## Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 183 o1229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY
tProcess

# Name: BYPASS DUST 

### BIN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: 

### NoRTH TEXAS CEMENT

### coMpANy - 

### BypASS DUST 

### BIN *Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.2200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBiH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.9600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2rJnit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http.llcfpub.epa.govhblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:5gg 

### Ill25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 184 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: RAW 

### MILL DUST 

### BIN *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### RAw MILL DUST 

### BIN
*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description:



### hftp:ll,cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.2200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBÆI Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9600 Emission 

### Limit

## ZUnit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# l: 02200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 10.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 185

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

## Name: SCRUBBER 

### AREA



### http:llcfpub.epa.govhblclReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: BAGHOUSE Page 186

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - SCRUBBER

### AREA

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.4100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.0900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LBiH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.4100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit I

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air U 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 187

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: RAW COAL/COKE 

### BIN *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### RAW COAL/COKE 

### BIN

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### & SPRAY 

### COAL/COKE PILES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0800 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.3600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: B *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### & SPRAY 

### COAL/COKE PILES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0800 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.3600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: B *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### AND SPRAY 

### COAL/COKE PILES. Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 188

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process

# Name: MAT STORAGE, CRUSHED 

### COALiCOKE 

### BIN *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MAT STORAGE, CRUSHED 

### COALiCOKE 

### BIN

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code:A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### AND SpRAy PILE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence



### http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### AND SPRAY THE 

### PILE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiyR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 189

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

'*Process 

# Name: MATEzuAL HANDLING 

### sysrEM INTO FINISH 

### MILL *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEM 

### INTO FINISH 

### MILL 

# *PollutantName Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.9200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. 

### TimeiConditión: Emission

# Limit2: 4.0500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10)



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.9200 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limít2: 4.0500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations 

### influence' the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2 Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 190

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process

# Name: CLINKER LOADOUT *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: I 13 1500.00 Throughput 

# Unit: T/YR Process 

# Notes: BAGHOUSE

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CLINKER LOADOUT
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1800



### http:llcþub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.8000 

### Eàission 

### Limit 

## 2lJnit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1800 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.8000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 191

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

## Name: FINISH 

### MILL SYSTEM 

### VENT *Process

## Type: 90.028



### http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

, Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK Page 192

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### FINISH 

### MILL SYSTEM 

### VENT
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 9.8300 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB,IH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limít2: 43.1000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 9.8300 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission 

# Limit2: 43.1000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) xControl Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE

. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 I1l25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 193

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY 

# *ProcessName: CEMENT 

### SILONO.l *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: 

### NoRTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CEMENT SILO NO.1
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.1000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.4600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10

### p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE 

### Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.10.00 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.4600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 194

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT SILO NO. 2 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: 

### NoRTH TEXAS CEMENT

### CoMpANy - 

### CEMENT SILO 

### No. 2 *Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.3400 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.5000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U' pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report



# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.3400 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.5000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 195 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT SILO 

### NO. 3 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON:NORTH

### TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CEMENT SILO 

### NO. 3 *Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

## Method BAGHOUSE Description:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB,IH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.4600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 1

# : 0.1 100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.4600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Urut: Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 196

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY 

# ' *Process 

# Name: CEMENT LOADOUT NO. 

### I AND NO. 2



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACKS 

### Pagel9T of229

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CEMENT LOADOUT 

### NO. 

### I AND NO. 2
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: A

. *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.3300 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. EACH Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 1.4400 Emission 

### Limit

# 2Unt: TiYR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. EACH Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,f,rlterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FPMIO) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.3300 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. EACH Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 1.4400 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. EACH Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control 

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDeÏailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 198

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: CEMENT SILO FEED 

### BIN #S. 

### 1,2,3,4 *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: BAGHOUSE STACKS

POIIUtANt Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CEMENT SILO FEED 

### BIN #S. 1. 2. 

### 3,4

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1400 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. EACH Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.6200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. EACH Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 pr(FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# l: 0.1400 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. EACH Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.6200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR

http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. EACH Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Visible Emissions 

### (VE) *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method BAGHOUSE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 5.0000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: % 

### OPACITY Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. 6 

### MINUTE AVERAGE Time/Condition: Emission 

### Limit2: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2Unit: Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 199

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: FRONT 

### END LOADER DROP 

### POINT TO CRUSHER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

### ONLY

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - FRONT END 

### LOADER DROp 

### POINT TO CRUSHER

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### V/ITH WATER SPRAYER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5700 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg, Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.6400 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report



### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterabre 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### WITH WATER 

### spRAyER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2700 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.7800 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page200 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: CRUSHER 

### DRop 

### poINT 

### To coNVEyoR BELT *Process

# Type: 90.028 Frimary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

## oNLy

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CRUSHER DROP 

### POINT TO 

### CONVEYOR 

### BELT

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: p 

### *control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### WITH WATER 

### spRAyER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# l: 0.5700 Emission 

### Limit I

# Unit: LBIIJ. Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: L6400 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### hup:llcfEtb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate.matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Contiol Method 

### Code: P 

### *control 

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### WITH WATER 

### spRAyER Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2700 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.7800 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page20I 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: LIMESTONE STORAGE 

### BUILDING VENT *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### LIMESTONE STORAGE 

### BUILDING VENT

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method FULLY ENCLOSED 

### BUILDING FoR 

### LIME STORAGE Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## 1: 0.1000 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.4200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter,, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: P



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page202 

### of229

*Control 

# Method FULLY ENCLOSED 

### BUILDING FOR 

### LIME STORAGE Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0500 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.2100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: SANDiI\4ILL SCALE DROP 

### POINT TO 

### HOppER *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process Notes:

Pollutant InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### SAND/I\4ILL SCALE DROP POINT TO HOPPER

*Pollutant

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

## Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND V/ATER 

### SpRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 0.1900



# Unit: LB/H Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.8200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control 

## Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### spRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0900



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ITl25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.3900 Emission 

### Limit

# 2Unit T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page203 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOcess 

# Name: MATEzuAL HANDLING, ADDITIVE DROP 

### POINT TO HOPPER *Procgss

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtAnt InfoTmation:NORTH 

### TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATEzuAL HANDLING, ADDITIVE DROP 

### POINT TO HOPPER
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### SpRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5300 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.3100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: B 

### *control 

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### spRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2500 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

# Limit2: 1.0900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiYR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page204 o1229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

+Process 

# Name: CLINKER TRUCK 

### LOADING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE.

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CLINKER TRUCK 

### LOADING

*Pollutant

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.5300 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 2.3100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 0.0700 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiYR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report



### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page205 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process

# Name: MAT HANDLING, COAL/COKE 

### DRop pT

### To HoppER (MTOg) *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

## oNLy

POlIUtAnt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MAT HANDLING, COAL/COKE DROP PT TO HOPPER 

### (MT08)

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control 

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### spRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBiH Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2 0.8200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control 

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### spRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0900 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.3900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2rJnit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence



### httpillcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

the 

### BACT decisions?: Page206

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS

# NAME: MATERIAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE DROP POINT 

### TO STACKER *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE 

### oNLy.

POIIUtANt lNfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATERIAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE DROP 

### POINTTO STACKER
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### spRAy. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.4700 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 2.0500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### spRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.9700 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http://cfpub.epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY Page207 

### of229

+PTocess 

# Name: MATERIAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE DROP 

### POINT TO 

### PILE *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE ONLY.

POIIutant InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATERIAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE DROP POINT TO 

### PILE

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER SPRAY Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.4700 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.0500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### SpRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 02200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9700 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: MATERIAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE 

### DRop 

### To HoppER (MT05)



### http:l/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE 

### ONLY Page208 

### of229

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATERIAL HANDLING, 

### coAL/coKE DROP TO HOPPER 

### (MT0s) 

# *PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND V/ATER SPRAY Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.4700 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 2.0500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER 

### SpRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2200 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9700 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCEsS

# Name: MATERIAL HANDLING COAL/COKE DROP FEEDER

### To BELT *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput:



### http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Il/2512009Format 

### RBLC Report

Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE Page209 

### of229

Pollutant 

### Information:NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATEzuAL HANDLING COAL/COKE DROP FEEDER TO 

### BELT

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER SPRAY Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/FI Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.8200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate 

### matter,filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.3900 Emission 

### Limit 2

## Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: MATEzuAL HANDLING COAL/COKE 

### DRop BELT

### To BELT *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE 

### oNLy.

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report 

### Page2t} of229

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATEzuAL HANDLING COAL/COKE DROP 

### BELT TO 

### BELT

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELTS Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.8200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### .*Control

## Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELTS Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.3900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



# : 0.0900 

## Unit: LB/H Avg.

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTocess

# Name: MAT HANDLING, COAL/COKE RECEIVING DROP TO HOPPER *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MAT HANDLING, COAL/COKE RECEIVING DROP TO HOPPER



### http.,/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### IIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND V/ATER SPRAY. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0700 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H EmissionLimit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.3100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE 

### AND WATER SPRAY. Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0400 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.1500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2ll of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: QUARRY CONVEYOR 

### BELT 

### To LIMESTONE STORAGE xProcess

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY -

### QUARRY CONVEYOR 

### BELT TO 

### LIMESTONE STORAGE

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### Ill25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiYR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factcirs, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2I2 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: QUARRY 

### BELT (SHIFTABLE) *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### AREAN ESTIMATE

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY -

### QUARRY 

### BELT (SHIFTABLE)
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELT Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.1300 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1Avg.



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### IIl25l20)gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.3900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. TimeiCondition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FPMI0) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0700 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIII Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2l3 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: QUARRY BELT (FUTURE) *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE.

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### QUARRv BELT (FUTURE)
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.1900 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LBiH Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.5500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg.

http://cfpub 

### .epa.govhblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 11125/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 Fr(FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0900 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. TimeiCondition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.2600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations infl uence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2l4 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: LIMESTONE CONVEYOR BELT TO FEED 

### BINS *Process

# Type: 90.019 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE

Pollutant 

### Information:NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### LIMESTONE CONVEYOR 

### BELT TO FEED 

### BINS 

# xPollutantName Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009Format 

### RBLC Report

considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2I5 of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: SAND/MILL 

### scALE CoNVEyoR BELT 

### To FEED 

### BINS *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### AREAN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - SAND 

### IMILL SCALE 

### CONVEYOR BELT TO FEED 

### BINS

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http://cfpub.epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

## lll25lill}gFormat 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FPM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: A *Control

# Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.0100



# . Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2IJnit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 216 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: RAV/ 

### MIX coNVEYoR BELT 

### To GRINDING 

### sysrEM *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: 

# ffi:Jåtñ:lunit: FUGrrrvE EMrssroNS ARE

### AN ESTTMATE

POIIutant InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### RAW 

### MIX CONVEYOR 

### BELT 

### To GRINDING SYSTEM

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1

## Avg. LESS

### THAN TimeiCondition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

## Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2IT 

### of229

Process 

### Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Proces's 

# Name: CLINKER PAN CONVEYOR *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTES: CLINKER PAN CONVEYOR TO STORAGE SILO. 

### FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: NORTFI 

### TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CLINKER PAN CONVEYOR
*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR Description: Emission 

### Limit

# 1: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0700 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. TimeiCondition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELT Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LB/H

http://cfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0400 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2lS o1229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: CLINKER CONVEYOR *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCCSS

# Notes: CLINKER CONVEYOR BELT TO 

### FINISH GRINDING AREA. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### CLINKER CONVEYOR
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.1300 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBIH Emission 

### Limit 1Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0700



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page2I9 of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: MATEzuAL HANDLING, ADDITIVES

### To GRINDING *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit:

PTOCESS

# NOTES: ADDITIVE CONVEYOR BELT TO 

### FINISH GRINDING AREA. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE 

### ONLY

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATERIAL HANDLING, ADDITIVES TO 

### GRINDING

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: p *Control 

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0200



# , Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.0600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: Tly Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name particulate matter, filterable 

### < 

### l0 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: p *Control 

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LBIIJ' Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.0300



# . Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg.



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page220 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS

# NAME: MAT HANDLING, COALiCOKE LINLOADING CONVEYOR 

### BELT *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANI INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MAT HANDLING, COALiCOKE TINLOADING CONVEYOR 

### BELT
*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBÆI Emission 

### Limit I

# Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2IJntt: TiyR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name particulate

## -uu.r, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: p 

### *control 

# Method covERED 

### coNVEyoR BELT, WATER 

### spRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit

# l: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LBÆI Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2IJnit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00

1

### ll25/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

### Page22l of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS

# NAMC: MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR 

### TO STACKER *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel:



# . Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

### oNLy.

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR TO STACKER

*Pollutant

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

## Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LBÆI Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

## *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

## Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission 

## Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2rJnit: TiyR Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then

### airU pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:



### http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page222

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: MATERIAL HANDLING, 

### coAL/coKE STACKER 

### To PILE *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

## oNLy

POllutant InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATEzuAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE STACKER TO 

### PILE 

# *PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURES, 

### V/ATER SpRAyS Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limít2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable



# . 10 p 

### (FpMrO) *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method ENCLOSURE, 

### WATER 

### SpRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LP,IH Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS

## NAME: MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR TO COAL GRINDING



### http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1 

### Il25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report Page223 

### of229

*Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Tbroughput: Throughput 

### Unit:
PTOCEss

# Notes: COAL/COKE CONVEYOR BELT TO 

### COAL GRINDING SYSTEM. 

### FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

### ONLY

POIIUtAnt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR TO 

### COAL GRINDING

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (PM) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELT Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unít: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN



## . Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 

### p (FpMlO) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY



# , *PTOCESS

# NAME: MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR TO 

### MILL FEED 

### BIN *Process

# Type: 90.011 

### ' Primary Fuel:



### http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report

Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

## oNLy Page224 

### of229

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR TO 

### MILL FEED 

### BIN

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate Matter (PM) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED CONVEYOR 

### BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/YR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) 

### *Control Method 

### Code: P 

### *Control

# Method COVERED 

### CONVEYOR BELT Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

## Unit: LBiH Emission 

### Limit 1

# Avg. LESS

### THAN Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2

## Avg. LESS 

### THAN Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process

# Name: MATEzuAL 

### sroRAGE, 

### coAL/coKE PILES *Process

# Type: 90.011 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

### oNLy.

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### lll25/2009

## ' Foirnat 

### RBLC Report Page225 

### of229

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - 

### MATERIAL STORAGE, 

### COAL/COKE PILES 

# *PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: P *Control 

# Method SPRAY THE C/C PILES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2800 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 1.2100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR 

# ' Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg.



# , Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: p *Cohtrol 

# Method SPRAY THE C/C PILES Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.5500 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 2.4100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process

# Name: ADDITIVE PILE *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE 

### ONLY

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT

### coMpANy -

### ADDITIVE PILE



### http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll125/2009Format 

### RBLC Report

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: 

### EmissionLimit 

## 1: 0.1600 Emission 

### Limit 

### I 

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.7000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiyR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

## Name Particulate matter, firterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

## 1: 0.0800 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit:. LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

## Limit2: 0.3500 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page 226 of 229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process 

# Name: MILL SCALE 

### PILE *Process

# Type: 90.029 Primary 

# Fuel:

I Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE 

## oNLy

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY -

### MILL SCALE 

### PILE *Pollutant 

## Name Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: p *Control

## Method WATER SpRAyS Description:



### http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit 1

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: 

# ' EmissionLimit2: 0.1100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiyR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 F

### GpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: p



# . *Control 

# Method WATER 

### SpRAy Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission 

# Limit2: 0.0600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page227

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY
*Process

# Name: SAND 

### PILE *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput: Throughput 

### Unit: Process 

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS 

### ARE

### AN ESTIMATE 

### oNLy

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT

### coMpANy - SAND 

### PILE *Pollutant

# Name particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0300 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcfpub'epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll2s12009Format 

### RBLC Report

Emission

# Limit2: 0.1100 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, otherthen air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant 

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p 

### (FpMl0) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.0200 Emission 

### Limit 1

## Unit: LB/H Emission 

### Limit 

### I Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.0600 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TiyR Emission 

### Limit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page228 

### of229

Process 

### Information :

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY
*Process

# Name: CLINKER PILE *Process

# Type: 90.028 Primary Fuel: Throughput Throughput 

### Unit: Process

# Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE 

### AN ESTIMATE 

## oNLy

Pollutant Information: 

### NORTH TEXAS CEMENT 

### CoMpANy - 

### CLINKER PILE 

## *PollutantName Particulate Matter 

### (pM) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit Emission 

### Limit 

# : 0.4200



## Unit: LB'IH Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 1.8000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: T/yR Emission 

### Limit 2 Avg. Time/Condition:



### http:llcþub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 

### lIl25l200gFormat 

### RBLC Report



### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations infl uenee the 

### BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant

# Name Particulate matter, filterable 

### < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method 

### Code: N *Control Method Description: Emission 

### Limit 

# 1: 0.2100 Emission 

### Limit 

### I

# Unit: LBI}I ' Emission 

### Limit 1

### Avg. Time/Condition: Emission

# Limit2: 0.9000 Emission 

### Limit

## 2Unit: TfyR EmissionLimit 

### 2 Avg. Time/Condition: 

### Did factors, other then air 

### U pollution technology considerations influence the 

### BACT decisions?: Page229 

### of229



### http:lhfp¿lb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 

### 1I/25DIAI