alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPIC!	AERIALS	

AN	EPIC!	TOURS	LLC	COMPANY

JULY	20,		2015

U.S.	DEPARTMENT	OF	TRANSPORTATION

DOCKET	MANAGEMENT	SYSTEM

1200	NEW	JERSEY	AVE.,	SE

WASHINGTON,	DC	20590

EPIC!	AERIALS,		AN	EPIC!	TOURS	LLC,	COMPANY’S	PETITION	FOR	EXEMPTION	TO	

OPERATE	UNMANNED	AIRCRAFT	SYSTEMS	FOR	AERIAL	PHOTOGRAPHY	AN	

FILMING

FAA	Regulator	Docket

Name	and	address	of	Petitioner:

Epic!	Tours	LLC

Attn:	James	P.	Ward

430	w.	Kawili	st.	apt	3c

Hilo,	Hi	96720

epicbigisland@gmail.com

(808)	747-1211

Epic!	Tours	LLC

Hilo,	Hawaii

www.epicbigisland.com

430	W.		KAWILI	ST.	SUITE	3C

HILO,	HI	96720

(808)	747-1211

EMAIL:	EPICBIGISLAND@GMAIL.COM
I. PETITION SUMMARY

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Pub. L. 

No. 112-95 (2012), 126 Stat. 11 (“Section 333”) and the Federal Aviation 

Administration’s (“FAA”) general exemption authority under 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f),

Epic! Tours LLC. (“Petitioner”) hereby petitions for exemptions from 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 

14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b)(1), 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151, 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a)-(b).

The	proposed	exemption,	if	granted,	would	allow	Petitioner	to	operate	small,	

camera-mounted	unmanned	aircraft	systems	(“UAS”)	weighing	55	pounds	or	less	

for	the	purpose	of	closed-set	filming	of	motion	pictures,	music	videos,	web	videos,	

corporate	videos,	television	programs	and	commercials,	wedding	and	entertainment	

venue	videos,	and	still	photography.

Based	on	the	small	size	of	Petitioner’s	UAS,	the	qualifications	and	experience	of	

Petitioner’s	UAS	operators,	and	the	restricted,	sterile	environment	within	which	

Petitioner	will	operate,	the	requested	exemptions	fall	squarely	within	the	zone	of	

safety	envisioned	by	Congress	and	set	forth	in	Section	333.		Additionally,	the	

enhanced	safety	achieved	by	replacing	significantly	larger	manned	aircraft	carrying	

crew	and	flammable	fuel	with small	UAS	carrying	no	passengers	or	crew	and	

operated	under	the	specific	guidelines	and	procedures	proposed	by	Petitioner	gives	

the	FAA	good	cause	to	find	that	the	UAS	operations	enabled	by	the	instant	Petition	

are	in	the	public	interest.		Thus,	the	requested	exemptions	should	be	granted.

II. BACKGROUND

Since working at a hobby shop starting in 2007, Petitioner’s has been a hobbyist R/C 

advocate. Starting in 2013, Epic! Tours has been in production and filming professionals 

have provided advanced motion picture services and camera support for films, television 

programs, corporate and music videos, and events around the world. Combining the latest 

technology with a long track record of safe and successful projects, Petitioner’s technical 

expertise has been relied upon for filming projects of a wide variety. In order to continue 

to provide the highest level of service, and to promote safety by eliminating the need for 

large manned aircraft on a filming set, Petitioner seeks regulatory exemptions that will 

allow Petitioner to employ camera-mounted UAS technology in the filming and 

production process. 

1.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5654 

To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from limiting the amount 

of Urban Area Security Initiative or State Homeland Security Grant 

Program grant funds that may be used to pay salaries or overtime 

pay of law enforcement officials engaged in antiterrorism activities, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2006 

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from limiting the amount of Urban Area Security Initiative or 

State Homeland Security Grant Program grant funds 

that may be used to pay salaries or overtime pay of 

law enforcement officials engaged in antiterrorism activities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Responder Fund5 ing Modernization Act of 2006’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5654 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS FOR 

2 SALARIES OR OVERTIME PAY OF LAW EN3 FORCEMENT OFFICIALS ENGAGED IN 

4 ANTITERRORISM ACTIVITIES. 

5 (a) LIMITATION ON USE PROHIBITED.—The Depart6 ment of Homeland Security may not limit the amount of 

7 covered grant funds that may be used to pay salaries or 

8 overtime pay of law enforcement officials engaged in 

9 antiterrorism activities. 

10 (b) TREATMENT IN RANKING PROPOSED USES.—In 

11 evaluating the anticipated effectiveness of proposed uses 

12 of covered grant funds for purposes of determining eligi13 bility for or the amount of a covered grant, the Depart14 ment of Homeland Security (including any peer reviewer 

15 acting on behalf of the Department) shall treat a proposed 

16 use for salaries and overtime pay of law enforcement offi17 cials engaged in antiterrorism activities as at least as ef18 fective as all other proposed uses. 

19 (c) COVERED GRANT FUNDS DEFINED.—In this sec20 tion the term ‘‘covered grant funds’’ means grant funds 

21 provided under the Urban Area Security Initiative or the 

22 State Homeland Security Grant Program. 

23 (d) APPLICATION.—This section shall not apply with 

24 respect to any grant awarded before the date of the enact25 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
NO. 07-05-0257-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	AUGUST 25, 2005

	______________________________

	STANLEY JOHN JONES, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 50,146-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal.  Appellant and his attorney both have signed the document stating that appellant withdraws his appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							James T. Campbell

							        Justice

Do not publish.
CHARLESTON.

#### Johnson *et al. v.*Minear.

Submitted September 13, 1894

Decided December 18, 1894.

A. B. Parsons for appellant.

Lipscomb & Lipscomb for appellees.

Brannon, President:.

Johnson and Phillips brought a chancery suit in the Circuit Court of Tucker county against Minear to set aside two tax deeds for lands sold for taxes November 12, 1889, and they were set aside, and Minear took this appeal.

For reasons given in the case of *Phillips*v. Minear, decided this term, see 40 W. Va. 58, the decree appealed from is affirmed.
[No. 51567-5-I.

Division One.

June 1, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Wenceslao Vera Ramirez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-02349-1, Michael J. Fox, J., entered November 25, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John M. HONGS, Appellant, v. DEAN TEAM OF KIRKWOOD, INC., Respondent.

No. ED 106492

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: December 11, 2018

John M. Hongs, 4240 Duncan Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, for appellant.

Mark R. Bahn, 5024 Griffin Rd., St. Louis, MO 63128, for respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

John M. Hongs appeals the circuit court's judgment setting aside an interlocutory order of default entered in his favor against Dean Team of Kirkwood, Inc. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of
her knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                    
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2016 |  | /s/ Meenu Chhabra                                                  
|                     |  | Meenu Chhabra                                                      
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                                               
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2016 |  | /s/ Lance Thibault                                                                            
|                     |  | Lance Thibault                                                                                
|                     |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Doyle E. BRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81096 Consolidated with WD 81097 WD 81098

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: February 5, 2019

Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, for Respondent.

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Doyle Brant appeals the judgment of the motion court, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 24.035 motions to set aside his convictions for two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy, three counts of second-degree statutory rape, and conspiracy to commit murder. He claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when plea counsel repeatedly advised him that if he pleaded guilty to all of the charges, he would be sentenced to three and a half years at the most. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
exh10-21reit10k2009.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.21

    


    AMENDED
ANNUAL COMPENSATION PROGRAM

    FOR
DIRECTORS OF

    FELCOR
LODGING TRUST INCORPORATED

    


    The Board of Directors has adopted the
following amended compensation program for directors of FelCor Lodging Trust
Incorporated (the "Company") for their service, commencing in 2010:

    


    1. Annual Service Fee: Each
non-employee director will receive an annual service fee paid currently each
quarter, as follows:

    


    
      	 
      	 
      	
              Annual
      Service Fee

            
	
              Chair,
      Audit Committee

            	 
      	
              $70,000

            
	
              Chair,
      Compensation Committee

            	 
      	
              $62,500

            
	
              Chair,
      Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

            	 
      	
              $62,500

            
	
              Other
      Member, Audit Committee

            	 
      	
              $60,000

            
	
              Other
      Independent Directors

            	 
      	
              $55,000

            


    

    


    Prior to
the start of each calendar year, each director has the right to elect to receive
all or a portion of the annual service fees in common stock of the Company,
rather than cash.

    


    2. Annual Equity Award: Each
non-employee director will receive an annual equity award equal to the number of
shares of common stock having a value equal to $55,000 on the grant date, at the
start of each year of service.

    


    


    All shares of common stock will be
issued under one or more of the Company's Restricted Stock and Stock Option
Plans, and shares are fully vested upon date of grant.

    


    Directors will not be paid meeting fees
for each Board of Director or committee meeting attended.  Directors
will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their
service.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  Certification

I, Kevin Armstrong, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cosi, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: November 6, 2003

By: /s/ Kevin Armstrong
    -------------------
Kevin Armstrong
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.9




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of Acasti Pharma Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the “Report”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
 
 I, Xavier Harland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Date: May 29, 2013
/s/ Xavier HarlandXavier HarlandChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,422]


Sun-Times News Group, Advertising Division, Merrillville, IN; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 27, 2009, in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at 
Sun-Times News Group, Advertising Division, Merrillville, Indiana.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6309 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Jeffrey SCOTT, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

WD 81642

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: March 5, 2019

Jeffrey Scott, Kansas City, MO, Appellant Acting Pro Se.

Bruce Farmer, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge Presiding, Thomas N. Chapman, Judge, and Cory L. Atkins, Visiting Judge

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Jeffrey Scott appeals the Decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he voluntarily quit his job without good cause. Scott argues that the evidence demonstrates he was improperly discharged for misconduct. We affirm the Commission's decision. Rule 84.16(b).
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of Hybrid
Coating Technologies Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph Kristul, Chief Executive Officer, and principal financial officer of
Hybrid Coating Technologies Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hybrid Coating
Technologies Inc.

Date: December 9, 2013

/s/ Joseph
Kristul-------------------------------Joseph Kristul President and
Chief Executive Officer,

(Principal executive officer principal financial and accounting
officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

- 1 -

---