alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 213 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 213

Supporting the designation of March 2023 as National Colorectal Cancer 
                            Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

Mr. Payne submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the designation of March 2023 as National Colorectal Cancer 
                            Awareness Month.

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men 
        and women combined in the United States;
Whereas, in 2023, approximately 153,020 Americans will be diagnosed with 
        colorectal cancer and approximately 52,550 Americans will die from it;
Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most highly preventable forms of cancer 
        because screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before 
        becoming cancerous;
Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, when treatment works 
        best;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every 
        individual aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60 
        percent of deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized colorectal cancer 
        is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all diagnoses occur at this stage;
Whereas colorectal cancer screenings can effectively reduce colorectal cancer 
        incidence and mortality, yet, 1 in 3 adults over 50 years of age are not 
        up to date with recommended colorectal cancer screening;
Whereas 1 in 23 men and 1 in 26 women will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer 
        in their lifetime;
Whereas, since 2011, colorectal cancer rates have been increasing by 2% per year 
        in people younger than 50 years of age;
Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on colorectal cancer 
        prevention, screening, and symptoms are held during the month of March 
        each year; and
Whereas educational efforts can help provide information to the public of 
        methods of prevention and screening, as well as about symptoms for early 
        detection: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Colorectal 
        Cancer Awareness Month; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the month with appropriate awareness and educational 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 26, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee will be held Tuesday, May 26, 2009, at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

 March 17, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

 Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-6360 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of UHF Incorporated on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald C. Schmeiser, as
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of UHF
Incorporated, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.








Date:                   April
28,
2008                                                                By:  /s/ Ronald C.
Schmeiser


Ronald C. Schmeiser


President,
Chief Executive
 Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer
CHARLESTON.

#### Lonnie Blevins *v.*The Virginian Railway Company *and*B. F. Byrd *v.*The Virginian Railway Company

(Nos. 6491, 6492)

Submitted October 1, 1929.

Decided October 8, 1929.

*M. P. Howard*and *Bailey & Shannon,*for plaintiff in error. *Grover G. Worrell*and *Wm. M. Holroyd,*for defendants in error.

Litz, Judge :

The writ in each of these cases was awarded to the judgment of the circuit court, dismissing an appeal from a justice, under section 174, chapter 50, Code, as improvidently awarded.

*670Judgment was rendered in each action September 29, 1928, by the justice for $150.00, at which time L. M. Norman, as agent of the defendant, noted appeals on its behalf and advised the justice that he would forward the necessary appeal bonds. Thereafter, he prepared and sent to the justice, by registered mail, a form of bond in each case, in the penalty of $300.00, with the defendant as principal and himself as surety, but through oversight failed to sign either. The registered receipt, signed by the justice October 5, 1928, was promptly returned to Norman, but the justice failed to notify him of the incompleteness of the bonds, and for that reason appeals were not perfected within the ten-day period, under section 164 of said chapter 50. Appeals were later awarded by the circuit court under said section 174, which authorizes the circuit court or the judge thereof in vacation to grant an appeal from the judgment of a justice after the expiration of ten days and within ninety days from the date of the judgment when the party seeking it shows “by his oath or otherwise good cause for his not having taken such appeal in the said ten days.” The “good cause” required, based upon fraud, accident, mistake, surprise or some adventitious circumstance beyond the control of the party seeking the appeal, must be such as will entitle a party to a new trial in the circuit court or authorize a court of equity to enjoin the enforcement of a judgment where a motion for a new trial has not been made. *Haller*v. Bartlett, 92 W. Va. 511. Good cause was held to have been established in that case by evidence showing: that the party seeking the appeal had filed with the justice an appeal bond which the latter failed to act upon until after the expiration of the ten days and then rejected it on the ground that it was not sufficient; and further, that if the justice had promptly rejected the- bond as insufficient, the party appealing would have had sufficient time in which to execute another, meeting the supposed requirements.

As the defendant knew, through its agent by the return of the registered receipt, that the bonds had been received by the justice, it had a right to assume that they were sufficient in the absence of notice otherwise. The justice also being *671within easy reach of the agent, his silence, under the circumstances, clearly indicates an intention on Ms part to deprive the defendant of its right of appeal in the interest of the plaintiffs.

The judgments complained of are reversed and the cases remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
Attachment 9

Biodegradation Report CBI Sanitized
**Exhibit 32.2****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**     Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of North PointeHoldings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                         /s/ John H. Berry   John H. Berry   Chief Financial Officer   Dated: November 14, 2005
Order entered December 1 9 , 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00665

- CV

UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellant

V.

PAMELA EVANS, PATRIC E ANDERSON, AS NE XT FRIEND OF PARIS D AVIS, &

LEATHA KATAVI JONES, AS NEXT FRIEND OF D OMINIC JONES, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 04449



### O RDER

B e fo re the Court is appell ees ’ second unopposed mot ion to extend time to file brief

. We

GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed on or before January 15, 2019.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed July 9, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00696-CR 

TAMI DEANNA MUNSELL, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 296-83018-2016 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Whitehill 

 On June 12, 2018, Tami Deanna Munsell filed a pro se notice of appeal in this case. On 

July 2, 2018, appellant filed a pro se notice of withdrawal of her appeal. The notice of withdrawal 

is signed by appellant. No attorney has made an appearance in this appeal. 

We GRANT appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 

We dismiss the appeal. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 

180696F.U05 

/Bill Whitehill/ 

BILL WHITEHILL 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TAMI DEANNA MUNSELL, Appellant 

No. 05-18-00696-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 296-83018-2016. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. 

Justices Francis and Fillmore participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered July 9, 2018.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM 39453

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Adriel R. ANDINO DIAZ

Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 25 March 2019

________________________

Military Judge: Jefferson B. Brown.

Approved sentence: Dishonorable discharge, confinement for 24 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence 

adjudged 12 February 2018 by GCM convened at Minot Air Force Base, North 

Dakota.

For Appellant: Major Todd M. Swensen, USAF.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Captain Peter F. 

Kellett, USAF; Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.

Before HUYGEN, MINK, and POSCH, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 
United States v. Andino Diaz, No. ACM 39453

2

59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c)

(2016). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, I, Martin Wolfe, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated.

Date: April 13, 2016

/s/ Martin Wolfe

Martin Wolfe, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6598

EARL N. OWENS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus PARRIS N. GLENDENING, Governor; LAMONT W. FLANAGAN, Commissioner; WILLIAM JEDNORSKI, Warden; OFFICER PEARSON; OFFICER KELLER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1839) Submitted: January 12, 1999 Decided: March 12, 1999 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl N. Owens, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., AttorneyGeneral, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Earl Owens, a Maryland inmate, filed an action against various prison officials alleging that they violated his constitutional rights by not protecting him from other inmates. He now appeals the district court order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Owens’ complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We affirm the court’s dismissal of Defendants Governor Parris Glendening, Commissioner of Pre-trial Detention & Services Lamont Flanagan, Warden William Jednorski, and Officer Mark Keller based on the reasoning of the district court. As to Defendant Officer William Pearson, we find that Owens failed to submit sufficient evidence cognizable on summary judgment to show that a trial was necessary on the issue of whether Officer Pearson knew of a substantial risk of harm to him. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 251 (1986) (requiring nonmovingparty to submit more than just some evidence to avoid summary judgment); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986) (stating that nonmoving party must allege “‘specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial’”). Accordingly, we also affirm thecourt’s granting of summary judgment to Defendant Pearson. We further deny Owens’ motion for summary remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatelypresented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-346V

UNPUBLISHED

CYNTHIA RUBLAITUS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 19, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Michael G. McLaren, Black McLaren Jones Ryland & Griffee, P.C., Memphis, TN, for 

petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On March 6, 2019, Cynthia Rublaitus filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) caused by an October 2, 2017 influenza (“flu”) 

vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the 

Office of Special Masters.

On February 18, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent has concluded that Petitioner’s alleged injury 

meets the table requirements for a SIRVA. Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that 

Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. 

Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 25, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |        |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: November 2, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David B. Snow, Jr.                         
|                       |  | Name:  |  | David B. Snow, Jr.                             
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |   |                                                                          |   |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| DATE:      August 13, 2009 |        | /s/      Brian D. Heinhold                                                    |   |
|                       |   | Brian      D. HeinholdChief      Financial OfficerEAU      Technologies, Inc. |   |

----