alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0219 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM228AD

757 -25 - 0298 --- 10/16/08 

### 757 - 25 - 0182 IN 01 --- 5/4/10 757 -25 - 0298 IN 01 --- 12/18/08 757 -25 - 0298 IN 02 --- 1/8/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221
**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
---

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In
  connection with the Annual Report of Supatcha Resources Inc. (the Company)
  on Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian
  Matsun, Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
  and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                   
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of Supatcha Resources Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

SUPATCHA RESOURCES, INC.

|By:   | /s/ Brian Matsun                                | 
|----- | ----------------------------------------------- | 
|      | Brian Matsun                                    | 
|      | Treasurer, Principal Financial
      Officer    | 
|      | Principal Accounting Officer and
      Director | 
|      |                                                 | 
|Date: | June 10, 2009                                   | 

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Rudolph COLES, Jr.

No. 417PA18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Michele A. Goldman, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, For Coles, Rudolph (Jr.).

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 26th of November 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of December 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20346 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RUBEN GARZA PEREZ
,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10

- CR

- 494

- 3

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Garza Perez has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Garza Perez has filed a response. The record is not suffi ciently developed to
allow us to make a fair evaluation of Garza Perez ’s claims of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore declin e to consider the claims without

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20346 Document: 00515006393 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2019No. 18

- 20346

2 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Garza Perez ’s response. We concur with counsel’s

as sessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 18-20346 Document: 00515006393 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2019
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41047 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARTIN B. YSASSI, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-242-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Martin B. Ysassi has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ysassi was advised of the motion and served with a copy of counsel’s brief, but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael DeMane,
certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, of Nevro Corp.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 29, 2015                               
|                                                 
|/s/ MICHAEL DEMANE                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|(Principal Executive Officer)
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 December 19, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-10955

 

D. C. Docket No. 04-00196 CV-LSC-W

SANDRA E. DAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHELTON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE,

TOM UMPHREY, individually and officially, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

 

(December 19, 2006)

Before DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and HODGES,* District Judge.

_______________________

*Honorable Wm. Terrell Hodges, United States District Judge for the Middle District of

Florida, sitting by designation.
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant/Plaintiff, Sandra E. Day, appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to appellees/defendants, Shelton State Community

College, Tom Umphrey, and James Rogers, on Day’s claim of retaliation in

violation of her free speech rights pursuant to the First and Fourteenth

Amendments and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs and having the benefit

of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment based

on its well-reasoned memorandum opinion filed on January 10, 2006.

AFFIRMED.
First Amendment to the Mirant Services Supplemental Benefit Plan



 Exhibit 10.46 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 MIRANT SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL
BENEFIT (PENSION) PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Mirant Services, LLC (“Company”) has adopted the Mirant Services
Supplemental Benefit (Pension) Plan, as most recently amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2009 (“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Mirant Benefits Committee (“Committee”) is authorized pursuant to Section 6.2 of the Plan to amend the Plan at any time, provided the amendment to the Plan does not
involve a substantial increase in cost to the Company or any United States subsidiary or affiliate of the Mirant Corporation which also has adopted this Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows effective January 1, 2009: 
 1. 
 Section 5.2(a)(i) and (ii) are hereby deleted and the
following is substituted in lieu thereof: 
  

	 	“(i)	The first annual payment of the Participant’s Pension Benefit shall be reduced by the amount necessary to pay any tax due under the Federal Insurance Contributions
Act with respect to the amount of the Participant’s Pension Benefit (“FICA Tax”). 

  

	 	(ii)	If additional FICA Taxes are imposed on subsequent annual payments of the Participant’s Pension Benefit or if the amount of FICA Tax exceeds the amount of a
Participant’s annual payment, in either event, subsequent payments of the Participant’s Pension Benefit shall be reduced to pay such tax. 

  

	 	(iii)	If FICA Taxes are imposed on the Participant’s Pension Benefit prior to the Participant’s Payment Commencement Date, the Committee may accelerate the payment
of the Participant’s Pension Benefit solely to pay all or a portion of the following: 

  

	 	(A)	The FICA Taxes imposed on the Participant’s Pension Benefit, 

  

	 	(B)	Any income tax withholding on wages imposed under Code Section 3401 or under any corresponding withholding provision under applicable state, local or foreign law
as a result of accelerating the Participant’s Pension Benefit to pay FICA Taxes, and 

  

	 	(C)	Any additional income tax attributable to the pyramiding Code Section 3401 wages and taxes. 








 The decision to accelerate the payment of the Participant’s Pension Benefit for the
reasons specified above is at the sole discretion of the Committee. The Participant is prohibited from making any direct or indirect election to accelerate the payment of the Participant’s Pension Benefit.” 
 ******************* 
 Except as amended herein by this First Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as amended and restated by the Company prior to the adoption of this First Amendment. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee through a duly authorized officer of the Company has adopted this First
Amendment to the Plan on this 1st day of September, 2009,
to be effective as of the date listed above. 
  

			
	MIRANT SERVICES, LLC
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Kevin P. Boudreaux
		 	Vice President, Administration


  

 - 2 -
**Exhibit 15.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-81825 and 333-149634 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-168347 on Form F-3 of Vodafone Group Plc of our report dated February 26, 2013 (June 7, 2013 as to Note 11) relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Vodafone Group Plc for the year ended March 31, 2013. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

New York, New York 

June 7, 2013
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-62,970-06

IN RE MICHAEL DEAN PERRY, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 42,139-A IN THE 188 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM GREGG COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contended that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 188 District Court of Gregg County, that more than 35 days had elapsed, and that the th

application had not yet been forwarded to this Court.

The District Clerk responded to this Court’s abatement order. According to the response,

Relator filed two 11.07 writ applications on June 15, 2015. On the State’s motion, the District Judge

signed an order finding that the writ applications were non-compliant with the Rules of Appellate

Procedure, and directing the District Clerk to return the writ applications to Relator. The District
2

Attorney kept a copy of one of the writ applications, but “discarded the other 800 plus pages,” as it

was expected they would be part of a re-filed writ application. 

The Rules of Appellate Procedure, effective January 1, 2014, state that, “[t]he district clerk

of the county of conviction shall accept and file all Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07

applications.” TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(a) (West 2016) (eff. Jan. 1, 2014). Rule 73.2, which formerly

authorized district clerks to return writ applications that were not on the form to applicants, now says

that this Court “may dismiss an application that does not comply with these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P.

73.2 (West 2016) (eff. Jan. 1, 2014). 

The District Judge’s order contravened clearly controlling legal principles, and caused the

District Clerk to violate her ministerial duty to file the writ applications and forward them to this

Court in accordance with Chapter 11 of Code of Criminal Procedure and Rule of Appellate

Procedure 73. However, because the District Clerk does not have Relator’s writ applications, and

the District Attorney has only an incomplete copy of one of the writ applications, Relator has no

remedy apart from re-filing his writ applications. Therefore, his motion for leave to file an

application for a writ of mandamus is denied. 

While this mandamus action was pending, Relator filed amotion to waive service and several

motions to supplement. The motions contain many pages of exhibits, which appear to be from or

related to his habeas corpus applications. His motions are dismissed. All motion exhibits shall be

returned to Relator. 

Filed: February 10, 2016

Do not publish
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas D. Leitnaker, Chief Financial Officer andPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|   | /s/ Thomas D. Leitnaker                                                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas D. Leitnaker                                                      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer |
|   | Dated: November 14,  2007                                                |

 

 

----
|    |                                                                                                                                                    |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A and the annual report on Form 10-K originally filed on March 31, 2015 of ClearOne, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                     |
|---------------------|
|                     |  |  |  |
| April 30, 2015 | By: | /s/ Narsi Narayanan |   |
|                |   | Narsi NarayananSenior Vice President of Finance |
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael A. Gerlich,
Chief Financial Officer of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: August 6, 2009



/s/ MICHAEL A. GERLICHMichael A. GerlichChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5435 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5435

 To amend the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 
   to extend by one year the deadline for the implementation of the 
                 Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2006

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 
   to extend by one year the deadline for the implementation of the 
                 Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF WESTERN 
              HEMISPHERE TRAVEL INITIATIVE.

    The second sentence of subsection (b)(1) of section 7209 of the 
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 
108-458) (commonly referred to as the ``Western Hemisphere Travel 
Initiative'') is amended by striking ``January 1, 2008,'' and inserting 
``June 1, 2009,''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
31.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Sylva
Leduc, certify, that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Conscious Intention,
      Inc.;
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report;
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:
 a.
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including our
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 b.
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c.
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.
 5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee or registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent function):
 a.
    All
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal
      controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
      affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and
 b.
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls.
 
 
 
 /s/
Sylva
Leduc
 Sylva
Leduc
 Chief
Executive Officer
 Duly
Authorized Officer and Principal
 Financial
and Accounting Officer
 
 
 Date: May
19, 2005