alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Outline of Supplemental Senior Management Performance Bonus Program


 Exhibit 10.1 
 Outline of Supplemental Senior Management Performance Bonus Program for Fiscal 2010. 
 1.
Performance Criteria. The Performance Criteria for Fiscal 2010 from which awards under this program will vest is achievement of Consolidated Earnings Before Tax(“EBT”) over the budgeted amount of $2,900,000. 
 Service Criteria. Participant must be employed by the Company on January 1, 2011 to receive a fully vested award under this program.

 2. The total bonus pool available under the program shall be 20% of the 2010 Consolidated EBT (net of bonus payments under this plan) over
$2,900,000 but shall not be more than $2,500,000. The Committee may adjust the actual Consolidated EBT to exclude extraordinary items in order to appropriately compare actual results with budgeted results. 
 3. The amount of the total bonus pool shall be allocated to the participating executives as follows: 
 CEO: 34% 
 Others:
22% 
 4. Election to be paid in Restricted Stock Units or Non-Qualified Stock Options. A participant may make an irrevocable election to
receive the award as Restricted Stock Units or Non-Qualified Stock Options within the time provided in the award notification which shall be no later than June 30, 2010 (the “Election Date”). Restricted Stock Units and Non-Qualified
Stock Options will be granted under the 2007 Employees Equity Compensation Plan on the Election Date based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Election Date (the “Closing Price”) and shall be subject to the
Performance Criteria and Service Criteria and provide for 25% additional vesting per year beginning one year from date of grant. Absent a valid election awards under the program shall be paid in cash. 
 5. Number of Restricted Stock Units or Non-Qualified Stock Options to be vested. The number of Restricted Stock Units or Non-Qualified Stock Options to be
vested to an electing participant shall be a multiple of the dollar equivalent of the bonus allocated to the participant divided by the Closing Price. The multiple for Restricted Stock Units is 1.33 and the multiple for Non-Qualified Stock Options
is 1.98. 
 Examples: A participant’s bonus allocation is $60,000 and the Closing Price is $3.00. If duly elected, an RSU will vest for
26,600 shares (60,000/3.00 x 1.33). If duly elected, an NQSO will vest for 39,600 shares (60,000/3.00 x 1.98) with an exercise price of $3.00 per share. 
 6. Bonus Payment Date. The date between January 2, 2011 and March 15, 2011 on which the Company will deliver the cash awards and finalize the other awards to the participants under the program.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ J. Roe Buckley               
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Name: J. Roe Buckley             
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer   
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation
Jane DOE v. WAKE COUNTY, et al.

No. 137P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2019

J. Locke Milholland, IV, Attorney at Law, for Doe, Jane.

Roger A. Askew, Senior Deputy County Attorney, Mary Boyce Wells, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Brian Kettner, Assistant County Attorney, for Wake County, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th of April 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2019."
Exhibit 13.1





Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Ecopetrol S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The annual report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 8, 2011


By:
/s/ Javier G. GutiérrezName: Javier G. GutiérrezTitle: Chief Executive Officer





Dated: August 8, 2011


By:
/s/ Adriana M. EcheverriName: Adriana M. EcheverriTitle: Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                   CURTIS W. MEWBOURNE/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne
Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners
03-A, L.P., (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on
Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Registrant fully
complies with the requirements of that section.

         I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.


                                           /s/ Curtis W. Mewbourne
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Name: Curtis W. Mewbourne
                                      Date: August 13, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 2, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David B. Snow, Jr.
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                  |  | David B. Snow, Jr.                  
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                 |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 4, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David B. Snow, Jr.              
|                     |  | Name:  |  | David B. Snow, Jr.                  
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David Hagan, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boingo Wireless, Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ David Hagan                 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | David Hagan                     |   |
|   | Chief Executive   Officer       |   |
|   | (Principal   Executive Officer) |   |
|   |                            |   |
| Date:  | June 10, 2011                   |   |

 

----
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 13-1760

Filed June 10, 2015

IN THE MATTER OF PROPERTY 

SEIZED FOR FORFEITURE FROM

ALONZO HENDERSON

ALONZO HENDERSON,

Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, George L. 

Stigler, Judge.

Alonzo Henderson appeals an order forfeiting $6113 in cash to the State. 

AFFIRMED.

Alonzo Henderson, Anamosa, pro se.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Katie Fiala, Assistant Attorney 

General, Thomas J. Ferguson, County Attorney, and Brad Walz, Assistant 

County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., Mullins, J., and Mahan, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2015).
2

MAHAN, S.J.

This is an appeal of an in rem forfeiture action under Iowa Code chapter 

809A (2013). The State initiated the action to forfeit $6113 in cash, alleging the 

money was “[p]roceeds from and/or used to facilitate the illegal sale(s) of 

controlled substance(s).” Alonzo Henderson filed a pro se response, stating he 

had an interest in the seized property and denying the property was involved in 

criminal activity. He also filed an application for appointment of counsel, which 

the district court denied. Following a hearing, the court ordered the $6113 

forfeited to the State, noting Henderson failed to file a sworn answer as required 

by section 809A.13. Henderson’s motion to reconsider was denied.

On appeal, Henderson contends he was entitled to appointment of a 

guardian ad litem. He also contends there was insufficient evidence to support 

the forfeiture because the State failed to prove criminal activity. We review his 

claims for the correction of errors at law. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.907. 

We find no merit to Henderson’s claims. A claimant in an in rem forfeiture 

action is not entitled to appointment of a guardian ad litem under Iowa Rule of 

Civil Procedure 1.211. In re Property Seized from Hickman, 533 N.W.2d 567, 

568 (Iowa 1995). Further, because Henderson failed to provide us with a 

transcript of the forfeiture hearing, see Iowa R. App. P. 6.803(1) (requiring the 

appellant to order a transcript of the proceedings if arguing a finding is 

unsupported by the evidence), we affirm. See Estes v. Progressive Classic Ins. 

Co., 809 N.W.2d 111, 115-16 (Iowa 2012) (“Failure to provide a record requires 

us to affirm the district court's judgment.”).

AFFIRMED.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 562

To authorize the Government of Ukraine to establish a memorial on Federal 

land in the District of Columbia to honor the victims of the manmade 

famine that occurred in Ukraine in 1932–1933. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. 

WELDON of Pennsylvania, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. BERMAN, 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. DOGGETT, 

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, and Mr. MCNULTY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Government of Ukraine to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 

honor the victims of the manmade famine that occurred 

in Ukraine in 1932–1933.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) Internationally accepted principles of 

6 human rights condemn the use of food as a political 

7 weapon. 
2

•HR 562 IH 

1 (2) In the years 1932–1933, Ukraine was rav2 aged and its people brought to the verge of physical 

3 extinction by a famine caused not by natural causes 

4 such as pestilence, drought, floods, or poor harvest, 

5 but as a consequence of a premeditated policy on the 

6 part of the Soviet Government led by Joseph Stalin 

7 to crush the nationally conscious Ukrainian people 

8 and destroy their national, political, cultural, and re9 ligious rights. 

10 (3) Attempts at intercessions were made by the 

11 United States Government during the height of the 

12 famine, in the fall/winter of 1932–1933, indicating 

13 that it has always been the traditional policy of the 

14 United States to recognize events such as the fam15 ine-genocide in Ukraine. 

16 (4) The United States Commission on the 

17 Ukraine Famine found in its report filed in 1988 

18 pursuant to Public Law 98–473 that the victims 

19 were ‘‘starved to death in a man-made famine’’ and 

20 that ‘‘Joseph Stalin and those around him com21 mitted genocide against Ukraine in 1932–1933’’. 

22 (5) Ukrainian communities worldwide plan to 

23 commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Ukrainian 

24 famine-genocide with appropriate observances to pay 

25 tribute to the victims of this tragedy. 
3

•HR 562 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Government of Ukraine is 

3 authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land in the 

4 District of Columbia to honor the victims of the Ukrainian 

5 famine-genocide of 1932–1933. 

6 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO7 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall 

8 be in accordance with the Commemorative Works Act (40 

9 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), except that sections 2(c), 6(b), 8(b), 

10 and 10(c) of that Act shall not apply with respect to the 

11 memorial. 

12 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES. 

13 The United States Government shall not pay any ex14 pense for the establishment of the memorial or its mainte15 nance.

Æ
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Allan Sepe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Blue Gem Enterprise, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended May 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blue Gem Enterprise, Inc.





By:/s/ Allan Sepe


Allan Sepe


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer/Principal Financial Officer)





September 14, 2010
EXHIBIT 10.1(a2) 


RATE APPLICABLE TO

PARTICIPATING DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER THE

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


Effective for the 2010 plan year, the Board of Directors and its
Compensation Committee has approved an applicable interest rate for the
Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan of 12.25%. That rate is a
reduction from the 12.5% rate in effect for 2009, and applies prospectively to
certain participants, including all participants who presently are directors or
executive officers of the registrant. Rates generally are subject to annual
approval by the Committee, but generally remain in effect until changed. The
new interest rate, within the context of the entire Plan, has been established
at a level intended to provide both retention and long-term non-compete
incentives.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 Date:
March 10, 2011
    
    By:
Name:
    
    /s/ George I. Lazenby

George I. LazenbyTitle
    
    Chief Executive Officer of Emdeon Inc.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Cassano, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 874]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered March 2, 1999, convicting him of intimidating a witness in the third degree (three counts), criminal contempt in the first degree (two counts), criminal contempt in the second degree (12 counts), assault in the third degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and aggravated harassment in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the validity of his waiver of the right to a jury trial is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Magnano,*77 NY2d 941, *cert denied*502 US 864; *People v Wheeler,*258 AD2d 542; *People v McKnight,*198 AD2d 306). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently executed a written waiver of his right to a jury trial in open court *(see, People v Wheeler, supra; People v McKnight, supra; People v Livingston,*184 AD2d 529).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.