alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 I, R. Douglas Orr certify that:

 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of First Cash
  Financial Services, Inc. (the "registrant");

 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
  this annual report;

 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
  the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
  report;

 4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
  defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15e) for the registrant and
  have:

  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
     is being prepared;

  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
     end of the period covered by this annual report based on such
     evaluation; and

  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
     fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
     likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over
     financial reporting; and

 5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
  our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,
  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to
     adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
     and report financial data; and

  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal control.

 Date: October 8, 2004

 /s/ R. DOUGLAS ORR
 --------------------------------------
 R. Douglas Orr
 Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bohai
Pharmaceuticals Group, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2010, I, Gene Hsiao,
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.           Such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and




2.           The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June
30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Bohai Pharmaceuticals Group, Inc.




Dated:
September 28, 2010




/s/
      Gene HsiaoGene
      HsiaoChief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5893]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended 
by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments 
on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, 
for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to 
be used, are being manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be postmarked on or before April 7, 2009. Address 
written comments to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be 
examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. at the U.S. Department of 
Commerce in Room 3720.
    Docket Number: 09-004. Applicant: William S. Middleton VA Hospital, 
2500 Overlook Terrace, Madison, WI 53705. Instrument: Electron 
Microscope. Manufacturer: Hitachi High Technologies Corporation, Japan. 
Intended Use: The instrument will be used to examine human tissues with 
significant pathological changes and experimentally manipulated animal 
tissues. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No U.S.-made instruments of 
same general category. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: 
February 13, 2009.
    Docket Number: 09-006. Applicant: Bergen County Technical Schools/
Bergen County Academies, 200 Hackensack Avenue, Hackensack, NJ 07601. 
Instrument: Transmission Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., 
Japan. Intended Use: The instrument will be used to explore nanoscale 
materials and phenomena. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No 
comparable instrument manufactured domestically. Application accepted 
by Commissioner of Customs: February 26, 2009.

    Dated: March 11, 2009.
Chris Cassel,
Acting Director,
IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
[FR Doc. E9-5893 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
EXHIBIT 21


<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 21





                             Subsidiaries of the Registrant(1)




                                                     State of       Percentage
                                                   Incorporation     Ownership
                                                   -------------     ---------

Farmers and Mechanics Bank                          United States       100%

FMS Financial Services, Inc.(2)                     New Jersey          100%

Land Financial Services, Inc.(2)                    New Jersey          100%

First Plunge, Inc. (3)                              New Jersey          100%

Fishpond, Inc. (3)                                  New Jersey          100%

Angell Ayes, Inc. (3)                               New Jersey          100%

Peter's Passion, Inc. (3)                           New Jersey          100%

Atlantic Adventures, Inc.(3)                        New Jersey          100%


------------------------
(1)   The  operations  of the  subsidiaries  are  included  in the  consolidated
      financial  statements  contained  in the  Annual  Report  to  Stockholders
      attached as Exhibit 13 to the Form 10-K.
(2)   Subsidiary of Farmers and Mechanics Bank.
(3)   Subsidiary of Land Financial Services, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 28, 2020

a0825

Order 

Clerk

August 28, 2020

161268-9(61)

VITA S. SHANNON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 161268-9

COA: 350094; 350110

Oakland CC Family Div: 

2017-852916-DC

ARON L. RALSTON,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 15, 2020 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration 

of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,266] 

                    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 17, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of the                           ( print page 11763)                        workers at Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., Vancouver, Washington.                 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of March 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-5912 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 1, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1212

Lower Tribunal No. 12-24437

________________

State Farm Insurance Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Efrain Xirinachs, Ericson Xirinachs, and Maureen Ogden,

Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Stanford Blake, Judge.

Clark, Robb, Mason, Coulombe, Buschman & Charbonnet, and K.

Gutierrez; Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Elizabeth K. Russo and Christopher J.

Bailey, for appellant.

Eduardo Gomez; Lopez & Best, and Virginia M. Best, for appellees.

Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.
State Farm Insurance Company appeals an order compelling appraisal in a

case arising from the Insureds’ supplemental claim for insurance benefits allegedly

incurred as a result of Hurricane Wilma. When ordering appraisal, the trial court

apparently assumed that the requisite standard to obtain appraisal is something less

than full compliance with post-loss obligations. This reasoning, according to the

Insureds, is supported by this court’s opinion in Citizens Property Insurance Corp.

v. Mango Hill Condominium Association 12, Inc., 54 So. 3d 578, 582 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2011), where we reversed an order compelling appraisal and remanded for an

evidentiary hearing on whether the insured “sufficiently complied” with post-loss

obligations. Neither the trial court nor the Insureds had the benefit of this court’s

recent opinion in State Farm Insurance Company v. Cardelles, 40 Fla. L. Weekly

D504 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 25, 2015), which clarified the law in this district.

In Cardelles, this court explained that all post-loss obligations must be

satisfied before a trial court can exercise its discretion to compel appraisal: “a full

reading of Mango 12 . . . confirms that ‘sufficient compliance’ still requires that all

post-loss obligations be satisfied before the trial court can properly exercise its

discretion to compel appraisal.” Id. at D505.

The Insureds in this case failed to comply with all post-loss obligations. For

example, they failed to produce necessary documentation and protect the property

2
from further damage as required by the governing policy. Given their failure to

comply with these obligations, the trial court erred in ordering appraisal.

Reversed and remanded.

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,249,411
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,249,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,146,137
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,249,211
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               178,611
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (177,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (324,283)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (324,283)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of TierOne Corporation
(Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               June 30, 2007 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 6, 2007 | By:  /s/ Eugene B. Witkowicz         
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                      | Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive Vice  
|                      | President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Neekson Khanna, Appellant, v Premium Food and Sports Enterprise, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[720 NYS2d 349]

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated May 1, 2000, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to enter judgment against the defendant Premium Food and Sports Enterprise, Inc., upon its default in appearing and granted the cross motion of the defendant Premium Food and Sports Enterprise, Inc., pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) for an extension of time to serve an answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*509The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to enter judgment against the defendant Premium Food and Sports Enterprise, Inc. (hereinafter Premium), upon its default, and in extending that defendant’s time to serve an answer *(see, Roche Mgt. v Burns,*275 AD2d 404; *Bungay v Joy Power Prods.,*243 AD2d 527). The appellant was not prejudiced by Premium’s unintentional and short delay *(see, Trent v Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Ctr.,*277 AD2d 444; *Stone v County of Nassau,*272 AD2d 392; *Chetrick v Cohen,*266 AD2d 254). S. Miller, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
# C_2017332EN.01000101.xml

| 4.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/1

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.8222 — Knorr-Bremse/Haldex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 332/01)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 1 June 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between Knorr-Bremse and Haldex. On 19 September 2017, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.

---
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5645 

To direct the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 

convey an easement to St. Louis County, Missouri, for the construction, 

operation, and maintenance of a road in Lemay, Missouri. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2006 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to convey an easement to St. Louis County, 

Missouri, for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a road in Lemay, Missouri. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENT. 

4 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Not later than September 1, 

5 2006, the Director of the Federal Emergency Manage6 ment Agency shall convey to St. Louis County, Missouri, 

7 without consideration, an irrevocable and perpetual ease8 ment over the property described in subsection (b) for use 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5645 IH

1 in the construction, operation, and maintenance of a road 

2 in Lemay, Missouri. 

3 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.—The easement to be 

4 conveyed under subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 

5 approximately 0.45 acres and 520 linear feet and is the 

6 route identified as the ‘‘FEMA’’ route in the document 

7 entitled ‘‘Lemay Connector Road for Long-Term Recov8 ery, Recreational Enhancements, & Community, & Eco9 nomic Development’’, dated June 1, 2006, on file with the 

10 Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 

11 House of Representatives. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1997, AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND
SUBSIDIARY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,404,346
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,950,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,701,490
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     89,114,439
<ALLOWANCE>                                    694,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,510,812
<DEPOSITS>                                 101,741,356
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,502,953
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,160,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             111,510,812
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,636,067
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              374,612
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               202,549
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,213,228
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,935,478
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,942,507
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,270,721
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  143,782
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,337,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                537,936
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   404,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    0.06
<LOANS-NON>                                    229,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   216,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,859,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               727,667
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  357,128
<RECOVERIES>                                   180,559
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              694,880
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           694,880
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>