alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 561 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 561

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 
 of Honor to be awarded to Gary Lee McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for 
 acts of valor while a helicopter crew chief and door gunner with the 
              1st Cavalry Division during the Vietnam War.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2005

Mr. Levin (for himself, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Turner, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. 
McCotter, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Strickland, Mr. Knollenberg, Mrs. 
    Miller of Michigan, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, and Ms. 
   Kilpatrick of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 
 of Honor to be awarded to Gary Lee McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for 
 acts of valor while a helicopter crew chief and door gunner with the 
              1st Cavalry Division during the Vietnam War.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR TO GARY LEE MCKIDDY FOR 
              VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR.

    (a) Waiver of Time Limitations.--Notwithstanding the time 
limitations in section 3744(b) of title 10, United States Code, or any 
other time limitation, the President is authorized and requested to 
award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Gary Lee 
McKiddy, of Miamisburg, Ohio, for the acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (b).
    (b) Action Described.--The acts of valor referred to in subsection 
(a) are the conspicuous acts of gallantry and intrepidity at the risk 
of his life and beyond the call of duty of Gary Lee McKiddy, between 
October 25, 1969, and May 6, 1970, and particularly on May 6, 1970, the 
day he died during a combat operation in Cambodia while serving as a 
Specialist Four in the 1st Cavalry Division of the United States Army.
    (c) Posthumous Award.--The Medal of Honor may be awarded under this 
section posthumously as provided in section 3752 of title 10, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
TierOne Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
            period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 6, 2004              By: /s/ Gilbert G. Lundstrom
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of the Board
                                   and Chief Executive Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to TierOne Corporation and will be retained
by TierOne Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                       44
' ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

MicroTechnologies, LLC 

Under Contract No. FA4890-13-F-Q106 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59911, 59912 

Lewis P. Rhodes, Esq. 

Assistant General Counsel 

Col Matthew J. Mulbarger, USAF 

Air Force Chief Trial Attorney 

Gregory A. Harding, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 27 July 2016 

MARK A. MELNICK 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59911, 59912, Appeals of 

MicroTechnologies, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 54

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide reasonable 

standards for congressional gold medals, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 54 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Gold 

3 Medal Enhancement Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REASONABLE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR CON5 GRESSIONAL GOLD MEDALS. 

6 Section 5111 of title 31, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(e) CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL STANDARDS.—

10 ‘‘(1) MAXIMUM NUMBER.—Beginning on the 

11 date of the enactment of the Congressional Gold 

12 Medal Enhancement Act of 2005, the Secretary of 

13 the Treasury may strike not more than 2 congres14 sional gold medals for presentation pursuant to an 

15 Act of the Congress in any calendar year. 

16 ‘‘(2) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—The Sec17 retary may strike congressional gold medals only in 

18 accordance with the following requirements: 

19 ‘‘(A) RECIPIENTS.—Only an individual 

20 may be a recipient of a congressional gold 

21 medal. 

22 ‘‘(B) TIMING.—No gold medal may be pre23 sented posthumously on behalf of any individual 

24 except during the 20-year period beginning 5 

25 years after the death of the individual (unless 

26 the Act of Congress authorizing the striking of 
3

HR 54 RFS 

1 such medal was enacted before the death of 

2 such individual)’’.

Passed the House of Representatives January 26, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5621 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5621

                    For the relief of Eqbal Shaikh.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2006

Mr. Davis of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Eqbal Shaikh.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR EQBAL SHAIKH.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Eqbal Shaikh shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Eqbal Shaikh enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Eqbal Shaikh, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Eqbal Shaikh 
shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                   
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies    
|    | with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the
|    | results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                                                



|Date: May 7, 2010
|-----------------



|/s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Director Compensation Schedule



 Exhibit 10(x) 
 INVACARE CORPORATION 
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COMPENSATION 
  

			
	 Retainer Fee
	  	 $40,000

		
	 Additional Retainer Fees
	  	
	 Lead Director:
	  	 $10,000

	 Audit Chair:
	  	 $7,500

	 Compensation Chair:
	  	 $2,500

		
	 Regular Meeting Fees
	  	 $2,000

		
	 Committee Meeting Fees
	  	
	 Chair:
	  	 $2,000

	 Member:
	  	 $1,500

	 Telephonic Meetings
	  	 50% of the applicable meeting fee

		
	 Stock Components
	  	 Restricted stock award grant value of $54,000

		
		  	 For new directors - non-qualified stock option grant equal to $150,000 divided by the market price on date elected

		
	Non-Employee Director Elective Stock Option Program	  	 Non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their following year director fees into discounted stock options
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06-17-00183-CR &

06-17-00184-CR

MIRANDA RENEA KELSO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 41161CR & 41162CR

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the court reporter’s records and the supplemental court reporter’s records in 

these cases indicates that they contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth 

date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was 

committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The reporter’s records and the supplemental reporter’s 

records contain the name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. 

Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, 

including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX.R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

reporter’s records and the supplemental reporter’s records contain sensitive data, we order the clerk 

of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal all volumes—including all 

exhibits—of the electronically filed reporter’s records and supplemental reporter’s records in these

cases. State’s Exhibit One, included within the reporter’s records, was not electronically filed. 

This order is specifically intended to encompass that exhibit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: September 20, 2018
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ali Yazdchi v. Makansam Inc d/b/a Ideal Towing

Appellate case number: 01-20-00008-CV

Trial court case number: 1133779

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

The Court dismissed this appeal by opinion dated March 12, 2020 because appellant has 

been adjudicated a vexatious litigant and the appeal was not from a prefiling order or one approved 

by the local administrative judge. Although appellant had not yet filed a motion for rehearing, he 

filed and was granted three extensions before he filed a notice claiming that he had obtained 

permission to appeal. On August 25, 2020, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and 

requesting a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order granting appellant permission to 

appeal. On September 15, 2020, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing an order 

granting appellant permission to appeal.

The Court, on its own motion, reinstates this appeal on the active docket, withdraws the 

opinion and judgment of March 12, 2020, and sets the reporter’s record due 30 days from the 

date of this order. The clerk’s record contains multiple statements of inability to afford payment 

of costs on appeal. The record contains no written order overruling appellant’s claim of inability. 

See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a) (party who files statement of inability cannot be required to pay costs 

unless trial court signs written order as provided by the rule). 

Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court shall designate appellant as indigent and the record 

shall be filed at no cost to appellant.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___Justice Peter Kelly________________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel includes Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.

Date: ___December 14, 2021____
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Don Stricklin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ L. Don Stricklin                 
|L. Don Stricklin                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 11, 2006
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000185 06-DEC-2019 08:00 AM
Rodney E. CUTTS, Appellant, v. MO. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.

WD 80884

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: May 29, 2018

Rodney Cutts, Appellant Pro-se.

Stephen D. Hawke, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

*452Rodney Cutts appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment and entering judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. He claims that he had a protected liberty interest in parole once he served the mandatory minimum sentence. He further contends that he was denied meaningful parole consideration when the Board did not disclose to him, and based its decision on, inaccurate adverse information in his parole file. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          PAC RIM HOLDING CORPORATION

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 (Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                           Year Ended December 31,
                                     ----------------------------------
                                          1996        1995     1994
                                          ----        ----     ----
<S>                                    <C>         <C>         <C>
Primary:
Average shares outstanding                9,528      9,528     9,528
Net effect of dilutive stock
 warrants and options--based on
  modified treasury stock method
  using average market price              2,801      2,852
                                       --------    -------    ------
Totals                                   12,329     12,380     9,528
                                       ========    =======    ======
 
Net income (loss)                      $(15,900)    $  575    $1,158
 add interest on retirement
  convertible debenture, net of tax         821        861
                                       --------    -------    ------
Net income (loss) for primary
 earnings per share                     (15,079)   $ 1,436    $1,158
 
Per share income (loss) amount*          $(1.67)     $0.06     $0.12
                                       ========    =======    ======
 
Assuming full dilution:
Average shares outstanding                9,528      9,528     9,528
Net effect of dilutive stock
  warrants and options--based on
  modified treasury stock method
  using closing market price              2,801      2,852
 
Assumed conversion of convertible
 debenture                                7,273      7,273
                                       --------    -------    ------
Totals                                   19,602     19,653     9,528
                                       ========    =======    ======
 
Net income (loss)                      $(15,900)      $575    $1,158
Add interest on conversion of
 convertible debenture, net of tax        1,414      1,522       861
Add interest income from excess
 funds on conversion, net of tax            392        471
                                       --------    -------    ------
Net income (loss) for fully diluted
 earnings per share                    $(14,094)   $ 2,568    $1,158
                                       ========    =======    ======
 
Net share income (loss) amount*          $(1.67)     $0.06     $0.12
                                       ========    =======    ======
 
</TABLE>

*The common stock equivalent shares arising from the effects of stock options,
warrants, and convertible debentures were antidilutive for the year ended
December 31, 1996, therefore, 9,528,000 are used for the calculation of primary
and fully diluted earnings per share.
EXHIBIT 31.2 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

  I, J. Roe Buckley certify that: 

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. 

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.       The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting tobe designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:                May 16, 2011