alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5392 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to direct the President to extend the availability of unemployment 

assistance made available in connection with Hurricane Katrina and 

Hurricane Rita. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2006 

Mr. BAKER (for himself and Mr. BOUSTANY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to direct the President to extend 

the availability of unemployment assistance made available in connection with Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the 

5 case of an individual eligible to receive unemployment as6 sistance under section 410(a) of the Robert T. Stafford 

7 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5392 IH

1 5177(a)) as a result of a disaster declaration made for 

2 Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Rita on or after August 

3 29, 2005, the President shall make such assistance avail4 able for 52 weeks after the date of the disaster declara5 tion. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the National Advisory Council for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NACCAM) meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussion could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Advisory Council for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.                     

*Date:*                         April 7, 2009.                     

*Closed:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Teleconference).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Martin H. Goldrosen, PhD, Executive Secretary, Director, Division of Extramural Activities, National Center for Complementary, and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 594-2014.                     

Dated: March 13, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. E9-6036 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bohai Pharmaceuticals Group, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2011, I, Gene Hsiao, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bohai Pharmaceuticals Group, Inc.





Dated: September 28, 2011





/s/ Gene HsiaoGene HsiaoChief Financial Officer
CHARLESTON

#### May *v.*Davis Coal *&*Coke Company.

Submitted September 12, 1911.

Decided October 29, 1912.

Master and *Servant*— Injury *to Miner.*

The duty to see that refuge holes along motor roads in coal mines are kept, as required by section 10 of chapter 78, Acts of 1907 (Code Supp. 1909, c. 15h), rests on the mine foreman, not on the mine owner, and for injury to a miner resulting from their absence the mine owner is not liable.

Error to Circuit Court, Tucker County.

Action by”W. S. May against the Davis Coal & Coke Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

*Reversed.*

*Benjamin A. Richmond, B. A. Bowers,*and *A. Jay Valentine,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. 0. Strieby,*for defendant in error.

POEEENBARGER, JUDGE:

The gravamen of the action for damages for personal injury to the plaintiff, while in the service of the defendant, as a coal miner, is the lack of statutory refuge holes along the motor haul-way of the mine on which the plaintiff was injured, or provision for the safety of the employes on said way by means of sufficient space for a walk way between the track and the rib of the mine, or otherwise, in lieu of refuge or man holes.

While the plaintiff was going along this way from his room to *221the mouth of the mine for car checks, his lamp was knocked from his cap by contact with the roof and pnt ont. .Before he conld find and re-light it, the motor approached. There was no such refuge hole as the statute requires and he was unable to make the motorman hear. Endeavoring to escape injury by stepping to one side as far as he could, he found the space between the motor and the rib insufficient. The motor caught him about the knees and he finally fell between it and the cars, one or more of which passed, over his hand, cutting off three fingers.

The ground of defense was contributory negligence in permitting his lamp to be out, failing to run back to an opening about 33 feet distant, since the motor was running at a low rate of speed, neglecting to go out by a different way, provided for the purpose, the suitableness of which is denied,- and failing to familiarize himself with the state mining laws, a copy of which he had.

The judgment in his favor will have to be reversed, under principles declared in *Helliel*v. *Piney Coal Co.,*70 W. Va. 45, 73 S. E. 289, holding the statute makes it the duty of the mine boss,, not the operator, to provide refuge holes or, in lieu thereof, a pass way. The evidence shows the defendant had a mine foreman and his competency is not questioned.

The judgment was rendered upon a demurrer to the evidence. On reversing it, therefore, we will render judgment here for the-defendant.

*Reversed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 552 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 552

 To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to 
 the Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human 
                                person.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2005

  Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Bartlett of 
Maryland, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mrs. Myrick, 
Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Whitfield, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, 
   Mr. Akin, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Renzi, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of 
   Virginia, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. McCotter, Mr. 
 Pearce, Mr. Ney, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Souder, 
 Mr. Gingrey, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. 
 Wamp, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Pitts, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Chabot, 
   Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Gary G. 
 Miller of California, and Mr. LaHood) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to 
 the Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human 
                                person.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Right to Life Act''.

SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE.

    To implement equal protection for the right to life of each born 
and preborn human person, and pursuant to the duty and authority of the 
Congress, including Congress' power under article I, section 8, to make 
necessary and proper laws, and Congress' power under section 5 of the 
14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the 
Congress hereby declares that the right to life guaranteed by the 
Constitution is vested in each human being.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act:
            (1) Human person; human being.--The terms ``human person'' 
        and ``human being'' include each and every member of the 
        species homo sapiens at all stages of life, including, but not 
        limited to, the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other 
        moment at which an individual member of the human species comes 
        into being.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' used in the 14th article of 
        amendment to the Constitution of the United States and other 
        applicable provisions of the Constitution includes the District 
        of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other 
        territory or possession of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.15

      


      


      WRIGHT
& COMPANY, INC.’S

      EVALUATION
OF VARIOUS ATLAS PARTNERSHIPS TO THE 

      INTERESTS
OF THE PARTNERSHIPS EFFECTIVE

      DECEMBER
31, 2008, JOB 09.1078
#### Naaman Shelton *v.*State Road Commission

(No. 7366)

Submitted October 25, 1932.

Decided December 12, 1932.

*H. B. Lee,*Attorney General, and *B. Dennis Steed,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

*W. E. B. Byrne,*for appellee.

Litz, Judge.-

This is a suit by a landowner to enjoin the state road commission from condemning a triangular paree] of land, defined by the intersection of three state roads in Clay county. Prom a decree granting plaintiff relief, defendant has appealed.

The land is sought to be condemned not for present use, but for the alleged purpose of using a portion thereof as right of *192way in event of the roads being widened at the intersection. As the widening of the roads at that point (according to the evidence) must be effected by extending the outer boundaries thereof, in order to relieve the curvature at the inner sides, it would appear that such proposed public use is merely color-able. It is also claimed that the land should be condemned as a traffic safety measure to prevent its use for an automobile service station. A number of witnesses for plaintiff, including a prominent and skilled engineer, opposing the opinion of a witness for defendant, stated, in substance, that the maintenance of a filling station on the property will not, in their judgment, appreciably endanger traffic. Plaintiff has maintained and operated thereon for two years two gasoline pumps with incidental equipment for the sale of gasoline, apparently without interference with traffic.

Section 4, article 4, chapter 17, Code 1931, authorizes the road commission to condemn the right of way necessary to widen, straighten, grade or alter any state road. "While it is ordinarily within the discretion of the agency exercising the power of eminent domain to determine the quantity of land necessary for a public use *(City of Huntington*v. *The Frederick Holding Co.,*85 W. Va. 241, 101 S. E. 461), what is such public use as will justify the exercise of the power in the particular case is usually a judicial question depending upon the facts. *Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.*v. *Pittsburgh. Wheeling and Kentucky Ry. Co.,*17 W. Va. 812, 842.

We are of opinion to affirm the ruling of the circuit court. Our decision, however, will not preclude the state in a future proceeding, under materially changed circumstances.

*Affirmed.*
FORM 10-Q/A1


                               Amendment No. 1 to
                Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                     Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                    For Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2002


                          Commission File No. 000-49892

                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


           California                                  61-1407606
(State or other jurisdiction of                     (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                    Identification No.)

                    1889 West March Lane, Stockton, CA 95207
               (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

        Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code (209) 870-3215

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports,) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                       Yes [x]                     No [ ]

       Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant
           classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

             Title of Class               Shares outstanding as of June 30, 2002
              Common Stock
              No Par Value                                813,207
<PAGE>

                           Part II - Other Information

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

         (a) Exhibits.

         99.1     Certification of Financial Statements by Chief Executive
                  Officer and Chief Financial Officer

         (b) Reports on Form 8-K

                  A Form 8-K (Item 2) was filed June 25, 2002, to report the
         completion of the reorganization of Pacific State Bank as a subsidiary
         of the Company on June 24, 2002. The report contained audited financial
         statements as of December 31, 2001 of Pacific State Bank (incorporated
         by reference) and financial statements of Pacific State Bank as of
         March 31, 2002.


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

BY: /s/ Steven A. Rosso                          Date: August 12, 2002
   -------------------------------------------
        Steven A. Rosso
        President and Chief Executive Officer


BY: /s/ Carmela Johnson                          Date: August 12, 2002
   -------------------------------------------
        Carmela Johnson
        Executive Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer


                                       2
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBITS

99.1     Certification of Financial Statements


                                       3
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
     I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne DevelopmentCorporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P.(the “Registrant”), certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mewbourne EnergyPartners 03-A, L.P.
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant is made known to usparticularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
 

 

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data andhave identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and
     6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated inthis quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: August 13, 2004.              /s/   Curtis W. Mewbourne   Curtis W. Mewbourne   Chief Executive Officer
#### Michael Chiaia et al., Appellants, v William E. Bostic, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[719 NYS2d 277]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), *496dated April 5, 2000, as, upon reargument, adhered to so much of a prior order of the same court, dated November 19, 1999, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and granted the defendant’s cross motion, *inter alia,*to strike the complaint, to the extent of directing that they disclose the injured plaintiffs social security number and supply certain authorizations.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof adhering to so much of the prior order as denied the motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and substituting therefor a provision granting that motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiffs, and the order dated November 19, 1999, is modified accordingly.

A rear-end collision with a stopped automobile establishes a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the operator of the moving vehicle and imposes a duty on the operator of that vehicle to explain how the accident occurred. The operator of the moving vehicle is required to rebut the inference of negligence created by an unexplained rear-end collision because he or she is in the best position to explain whether the collision was due to some reasonable cause. If the operator of the moving vehicle cannot come forward with any evidence to rebut the inference of negligence, the plaintiff may properly be awarded judgment as a matter of law (see, *Leal v Wolff,*224 AD2d 392; *Barile v Lazzarini,*222 AD2d 635; *Abramowicz v Roberto,*220 AD2d 374).

Here, the defendant’s conclusory claim that he had a seizure and “blacked out” just before the accident was unsubstantiated by any competent medical evidence and was insufficient to rebut the presumption of negligence (see *generally, Spivak v Heyward,*248 AD2d 58). Thus, the plaintiffs were entitled to summary judgment on the issue of liability.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Baine Clark Company ) ASBCA No. 63092

)

Under Contract No. W9124M

- 20

- P

- 0027 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : William D. Kirkland, Esq.

Kirkland, Cain & Horn, PLLC

Frankfort, KY

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Weston E. Borkenhagen, JA

CPT Timothy M. McLister, JA

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 2, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63092

, Appeal of Baine Clark Company

, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 2, 2022 BRIAN S. SMITH

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals