alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE CHRISTOPHER JO HN RUDY

______________________

2013

- 1673

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No.

07/425,360.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

C HRISTOPHER J OHN R UDY , of Port Huron, Michigan,

argued pro se.

C OKE M ORGAN S TEWART , Associate Solicitor , Office of

the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office,

of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on

the brief were N ATHAN K. K ELLEY , Solicitor, T HOMAS W.

K RAUSE , Special Counsel for IP Litigation, and A MY J.

N ELSON , Associate Solicitor

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (R ADER

, Chief Judge, L INN

, and T ARANTO

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Wilkinson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey A. Wilkinson                            
|Jeffrey A. Wilkinson                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Eden Clark; Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bold Energy Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-l4(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (1) | the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 (the Report), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                                                     



|                     |     |                            
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|                     |     |                            
|Dated:  May 10, 2012 | By: | /s/ Eden Clark             
|                     |     | Eden Clark                 
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer and
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer    







|
|
|
Please place these documents in the NOx SOx secondary standards docket

Bryan Hubbell to: Tricia Crabtree 10/05/2010 09:54 AM

Thanks!

Dr. Bryan J. Hubbell

Senior Advisor for Science and Policy Analysis

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. EPA/OAQPS (C504-02)

RTP, NC 27711

(919) 541-0621

----- Forwarded by Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US on 10/05/2010 09:54 AM -----

From: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Angela Nugent/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/01/2010 11:43 AM

Subject: response to Ted Russell requests

AngelaWe are working on preparing a new version of Figure 8-1, that I expect to provide to you by Monday 

morning.

With regards to the other requests, please find attached a set of graphs showing the distributions of the 

components of the AAPI equation, and a separate file with a variance-covariance matrix for the 

components.

Please forward these on to Ted Russell and the rest of the CASAC panel.

Thanks,

Bryan

Dr. Bryan J. Hubbell

Senior Advisor for Science and Policy Analysis

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. EPA/OAQPS (C504-02)

RTP, NC 27711

(919) 541-0621

__________________

Bryan,

Back to Figure 8-1... just making sure: It has DDEP_ in front of each

species. Does the first "D" stand for "Dry", or are we looking at total

deposition of that species? Also, if you ever re-do that Figure, I

might make sure the colors and order of species match between the top

and bottom figure.

Also, in Appendix C, Table 1, can you provide the ranges used for each

component as used? I am not sure about the others, but I would find

some graphic/table indicating the spatial distribution of each quantity
to be useful. While I am at it, and recognizing all the free time you

all may have between now and Wednesday, giving us some feel for the

frequency distribution and possibly a variance-covariance matrix for the

terms in the AAPI equation as well... (If I don't ask, I know it will

not come, so I thought I might ask).

Cheers,

Ted

Prof. Armistead (Ted) Russell

Georgia Power Professor of Environmental Engineering

Ford Environmental Science and Technology Building

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Georgia Institute of Technology

311 Ferst Drive

Atlanta, GA 30332-0512

404-894-3079
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research, Special Emphasis Panel, NINR Loan Repayment Program Review (L30/L40).                    

*Date:*                         April 16, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yujing Liu, PhD, MD, Chief, Office of Review, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Ste 710, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 451-5152.                         *yujing_liu@nih.gov.*

Any interested person may file written comments with the committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 10, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-5995 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andre GASKIN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. ED 105843

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: December 26, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Kevin Louis Schriener, 141 North Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, MO 63105, LAW & SCHRIENER, LLC.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Colleen Dolan, J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.

*406*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Andre Gaskin ("Defendant") appeals from the Judgment upon his convictions following a jury trial for assault in the first degree in violation of Section 565.050 RSMo. 20001 , two counts of armed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015, unlawful use of a weapon in violation of Section 571.030, and attempted victim tampering in violation of Section 575.270. Defendant was convicted of assault and one count of armed criminal action and sentenced to 24 and 15 years of imprisonment respectively, with the sentences running concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jacinta Sit, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Oxford Technologies, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material   fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not   misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in   all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the   periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and   procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed   under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,   is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our

conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this   report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the   registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has   materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;   and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over   financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons   performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial

reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report   financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the   registrants internal control over financial reporting.







|/s/ Jacinta Sit                                               | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Jacinta Sit, President                                        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) | 



Date:   May 20, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAM LEYBA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

NV ENERGY, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 15295

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 01122

- JCM

CWH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2018 **

Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Sam Leyba appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

employment discrimination action alleging violations of Title VII and state law

.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for

failure to state a cla im under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). AE ex rel. Hernandez v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 27 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 15295

County of T

ulare , 666 F.3d 631, 636 (9th Cir. 2012)

. We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Leyba’s discrim ination claim because

Leyba failed to allege facts suffici ent to state a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v.

Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (“A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff

pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that

the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.”) ; Leong v. Potter , 347 F.3d

1117, 1124 (9th Cir. 2003) ( ele ments of discrim ination claim under Title VII).

The district court properly dismissed Leyba’s hostile work environment

claim because Leyba did not allege that the conduct was sufficiently severe or

pervasive. See Ariz

. ex rel. Horne v. Geo Grp., Inc ., 816 F.3d 1189, 1206 (9th Cir.

2016) (Tit le VII hostile work environment claim requires plaintiff to establish that

conduct was “sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of [his]

employment and create an abusive working environment”)

.

The distr ict court did not abuse its dis cretion by denying Leyba a second

opportunity to amend because Leyba did not make such a request and failed to

identify facts that could cure the deficiencies in his complaint. See D. Nev. R.

15

- 1; Salameh v. Tarsadia Hotel , 726 F.3d 1124, 1133 (9th Cir. 2013) (no abuse of

discretion to deny further leave to amend where plaintiff failed to identify facts that

could cure the deficiencies in the complaint ); AE ex rel. Hernandez , 666 F.3d at

636 (setting forth standard of revie w and explaining that district court may deny3 18

- 15295

leave to amend where propos ed amendments would be futile).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), I, David W. Hitchcock, Chief
Financial Officer of the Companies, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Companies.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  | /s/ David W. Hitchcock 
|                     |  | David W. Hitchcock     
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
exv10w52






Exhibit 10.52




BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED




Compensation Table for Named Executive Officers and Directors



Named Executive Officers:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Current	 
	 	 	Base Salary 1	 
	Chad C. Deaton 2
	 	$	1,270,000	 
	Martin S. Craighead
	 	 	700,000	 
	Peter A. Ragauss
	 	 	670,000	 
	Alan R. Crain
	 	 	488,000	 
	John A. O’Donnell
	 	 	412,000	 






Non-Employee Directors 3:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Cash Retainer:
	 	$	75,000	 
	Audit/Ethics Committee Chairman Annual Retainer:
	 	$	20,000	 
	Other Committee Chairman Annual Retainer:
	 	$	15,000	 
	Audit/Ethics Committee Members Retainer:
	 	$	10,000	 
	Other Committee Members Retainer
(Excluding Executive Committee):
	 	$	5,000	 
	Lead Director:
	 	$	15,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Non-Retainer Equity (restricted stock awarded in January,
stock options awarded 50% in January and 50% in July of each
year):
	 	$	200,000	 








 




			
	1	 	Base salary effective April 1, 2010.
In addition to their base salaries, these named executive officers, at the discretion of the
Board of Directors can receive equity compensation pursuant to the Baker Hughes Incorporated
2002 Director & Officer Long-Term Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibits 10.2 to Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003; 10.3 to Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005; and 10.3 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2008. These named executive officers also are entitled to
participate in the Company’s Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated,
filed as Exhibits 10.15 and 10.16 to Annual Report of Baker Hughes Incorporated on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
	 
	2	 	Mr. Deaton has an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Baker Hughes Incorporated,
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19, 2008.
	 
	3	 	Non-employee directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel and related expenses.