48806 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

1Two elements identified in section 110(a)(2) are 

not governed by the three year submission deadline 

of section 110(a)(1) because SIPs incorporating 

necessary local nonattainment area controls are not 

due within three years after promulgation of a new 

or revised NAAQS, but rather are due at the time 

the nonattainment area plan requirements are due 

pursuant to section 172. These requirements are: (1) 

Submissions required by section 110(a)(2)(C) to the 

extent that subsection refers to a permit program as 

required in part D Title I of the CAA, and (2) 

submissions required by section 110(a)(2)(I) which 

pertain to the nonattainment planning requirements 

of part D, Title I of the CAA. Today’s final 

rulemaking does not address the section 

110(a)(2)(C) and (J) infrastructure elements as they 

relate to the requirement as part D, Title I of the 

CAA. 

impede the movement of event 

participants or official patrol vessels in 

the regulated areas during the effective 

dates and times, or dates and times as 

modified through the Local Notice to 

Mariners, unless authorized by an 

official patrol vessel. The Patrol 

Commander may control the movement 

of all vessels in the regulated area. 

When hailed or signaled by an official 

patrol vessel, a vessel shall come to an 

immediate stop and comply with the 

lawful directions issued. Failure to 

comply with a lawful direction may 

result in expulsion from the area, 

citation for failure to comply, or both. 

Vessels not associated with the event 

shall maintain a separation zone of 200 

feet from participating swimmers. The 

Coast Guard may be assisted by other 

Federal, State, or local law enforcement 

agencies in enforcing this regulation. 

This notice is issued under authority 

of 33 CFR 165.171 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). 

In addition to this notice in the Federal 

Register, the Coast Guard will provide 

mariners with advanced notification of 

enforcement periods via the Local 

Notice to Mariners and marine 

information broadcasts. If the COTP 

determines that the regulated area need 

not be enforced for the full duration 

stated in this notice, a Broadcast Notice 

to Mariners may be used to grant general 

permission to enter the regulated area. 

Dated: July 29, 2013. 

B.S. Gilda, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Northern New England. 

[FR Doc. 2013–19420 Filed 8–9–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0582; FRL–9845–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Tennessee; 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to 

approve a portion of the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submission, 

submitted by the State of Tennessee, 

through the Tennessee Department of 

Environment and Conservation (TDEC), 

to demonstrate that the State meets the 

prevention of significant deterioration 

(PSD) related infrastructure 

requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA 

or Act) for the 2008 Lead national 

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). 

The CAA requires that each state adopt 

and submit a SIP for the 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of each NAAQS 

promulgated by EPA, which is 

commonly referred to as an 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. TDEC certified that 

the Tennessee SIP contains provisions 

that ensure the 2008 Lead NAAQS are 

implemented, enforced, and maintained 

in Tennessee (hereafter referred to as 

‘‘infrastructure submission’’). Tennessee 

provided to EPA an infrastructure 

submission on October 19, 2009, to 

address the infrastructure requirements 

for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, however the 

subject of this notice is limited to the 

PSD-related infrastructure elements. All 

other applicable Tennessee 

infrastructure elements have been 

addressed in a separate rulemaking. 

DATES: This rule will be effective 

September 11, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2012–0582. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30 

excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zuri 

Farngalo, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9152. 

Mr. Farngalo can be reached via 

electronic mail at 

farngalo.zuri@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. This Action 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

Upon promulgation of a new or 

revised NAAQS, sections 110(a)(1) and 

(2) of the CAA require states to address 

basic SIP requirements, including 

emissions inventories, monitoring, and 

modeling to assure attainment and 

maintenance for that new NAAQS. 

Section 110(a) of the CAA requires 

states to submit SIPs to provide for the 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of a new or revised 

NAAQS within three years following 

the promulgation of such NAAQS, or 

within such shorter period as EPA may 

prescribe. Section 110(a) imposes the 

obligation upon states to make a SIP 

submission to EPA for a new or revised 

NAAQS, but the contents of that 

submission may vary depending upon 

the facts and circumstances. In 

particular, the data and analytical tools 

available at the time the state develops 

and submits the SIP for a new or revised 

NAAQS affects the content of the 

submission. The contents of such SIP 

submissions may also vary depending 

upon what provisions the state’s 

existing SIP already contains. 

More specifically, section 110(a)(1) 

provides the procedural and timing 

requirements for SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) 

lists specific elements that states must 

meet for ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP 

requirements related to a newly 

established or revised NAAQS. As 

already mentioned, these requirements 

include SIP infrastructure elements 

such as modeling, monitoring, and 

emissions inventories that are designed 

to assure attainment and maintenance of 

the NAAQS. The requirements of the 

section 110(a) infrastructure SIP for 

purposes of the 2008 Lead NAAQS are 

listed below 1 and in EPA’s October 14, 

2011, memorandum entitled’’ Guidance 

on Infrastructure State Implementation 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 48807 

2This rulemaking only addresses requirements 

for this element as they relate to attainment areas. 

3This requirement was inadvertently omitted 

from EPA’s October 2, 2007, memorandum entitled 

‘‘Guidance on SIP Elements Required Under 

Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone 

and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards,’’ but as mentioned above is not relevant 

to today’s proposed rulemaking. 

4Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) includes four 

requirements referred to as prongs 1 through 4. 

Prongs 1 and 2 are provided at section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I); prongs 3 and 4 are provided at 

section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II). 

Plan (SIP) Elements Required Under 

Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 

2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS).’’ 

• 110(a)(2)(A): Emission limits and 

other control measures. 

• 110(a)(2)(B): Ambient air quality 

monitoring/data system. 

• 110(a)(2)(C): Program for 

enforcement of control measures.2

• 110(a)(2)(D): Interstate transport. 

• 110(a)(2)(E): Adequate resources. 

• 110(a)(2)(F): Stationary source 

monitoring system. 

• 110(a)(2)(G): Emergency power. 

• 110(a)(2)(H): Future SIP revisions. 

• 110(a)(2)(I): Areas designated 

nonattainment and meet the applicable 

requirements of part D.3

• 110(a)(2)(J): Consultation with 

government officials; public 

notification; and PSD and visibility 

protection. 

• 110(a)(2)(K): Air quality modeling/ 

data. 

• 110(a)(2)(L): Permitting fees. 

• 110(a)(2)(M): Consultation/ 

participation by affected local entities. 

On November 12, 2008 (75 FR 81126), 

EPA issued a final rule to revise the 

primary and secondary Lead NAAQS. 

The revised primary and secondary 

Lead NAAQS were revised to 0.15 mg/ 

m3. Tennessee provided its 

infrastructure submission for the 2008 

Lead NAAQS on October 19, 2009. 

On March 20, 2013, EPA proposed to 

approve, and in the alternative, 

conditionally approve in part, 

Tennessee’s 2008 Lead NAAQS 

infrastructure SIP. In that proposed 

action, EPA explained that the Agency 

was proposing to conditionally approve 

the PSD-related portions of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (hereafter 

referred to as prong 3 of 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)),4 and 110(a)(2)(J), and a 

portion of section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) of 

Tennessee’s October 19, 2009, 

infrastructure submission because 

Tennessee’s SIP (at the time of EPA’s 

proposal) did not include provisions to 

comply with all of the requirements 

associated with the aforementioned 

sections. Further, in the proposal, EPA 

explained that Tennessee had 

committed to submit SIP revisions to 

address these deficiencies. As such, 

EPA also proposed, in the alternative, to 

approve the entire Tennessee SIP, 

including the sections described above, 

as meeting the applicable infrastructure 

requirements for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, 

and explained that should Tennessee 

submit, and EPA approve, the necessary 

provisions to correct the identified 

infrastructure SIP deficiencies prior to 

EPA taking final action on the October 

19, 2009, infrastructure submission, that 

EPA anticipated finalizing full approval 

of the infrastructure SIP. It was also 

explained that, if EPA did not approve 

necessary provisions prior to taking 

final action on the October 19, 2009, 

infrastructure submission, EPA 

anticipated finalizing conditional 

approvals for those elements for which 

the Tennessee infrastructure SIP 

remained deficient. See 78 FR 17168. 

On June 18, 2013, EPA took final action 

on a majority of Tennessee’s October 19, 

2009, submissions with regards to the 

2008 Lead NAAQS. See 78 FR 36440. 

Today’s final rulemaking takes action on 

the remaining required elements of 

Tennessee’s October 19, 2009, SIP 

revision (110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of 

110(a)(2)(D)(i), and 110(a)(2)(J) as each 

relates to PSD requirements) regarding 

the infrastructure requirements for the 

2008 Lead NAAQS. 

The PSD-related requirements of 

section 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i), and section 110(a)(2)(J) 

include four necessary SIP revisions to 

address required changes to the State’s 

part C PSD permit program. The first 

revision was required by the November 

29, 2005, Ozone Implementation Rule 

New Source Review (NSR) Update— 

Phase 2 Rule (hereafter referred to as the 

Ozone Implementation NSR Update). 

Among other requirements, the Ozone 

Implementation NSR Update required 

that SIPs include the recognition of 

nitrogen oxides as a precursor for ozone 

consistent with 40 CFR 51.166 and 40 

CFR 52.21. See 70 FR 71612. In addition 

to the Ozone Implementation NSR 

Update, there are three other 

requirements that states must satisfy in 

order to meet the PSD-related 

requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C), 

prong 3 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), and 

section 110(a)(2)(J). These three 

revisions are related to (1) the 

‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring 

Rule’’ (June 3, 2010, 75 FR 31514), (2) 

the NSR PM2.5 Rule (May 16, 2008, 73 

FR 28321), and (3) the portion of the 

final rulemaking entitled ‘‘Final Rule 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

(PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 

2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5)—Increments, 

Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and 

Significant monitoring Concentration 

(SMC): Final Rule’’ that relates to the 

PM2.5 PSD increments requirements 

(hereafter referred to as the PM2.5 PSD 

Increment-SILs-SMC Rule (only as it 

relates to PM2.5 PSD Increments)) (75 FR 

64864). 

Tennessee’s SIP has been revised to 

meet each of the above PSD-related 

requirements. Specifically, Tennessee’s 

Ozone Implementation NSR Update SIP 

revision was submitted by TDEC on 

May 28, 2009, and approved by EPA on 

February 7, 2012. See 77 FR 6016. 

Tennessee submitted its Greenhouse 

Gas (GHG) Tailoring Rule SIP revision 

to EPA on January 11, 2012, and EPA 

approved it on February 28, 2012. See 

77 FR 11744. Tennessee submitted its 

NNSR SIP revision related to the 

implementation of the NSR PM2.5 Rule 

on July 29, 2011, and EPA approved this 

revision on July 30, 2012. See 77 FR 

44481. Lastly, on May 10, 2013, 

Tennessee submitted a SIP revision to 

satisfy the requirements of the PSD 

PM2.5 Increments, SILs and SMC Rule, 

and the final rulemaking for this SIP 

revision was published on July 23, 2013. 

See 78 FR 44886. 

II. This Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

Tennessee’s infrastructure submission 

as demonstrating that the State meets 

the PSD-related requirements of section 

110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i), and section 110(a)(2)(J) 

of the CAA for the 2008 Lead NAAQS. 

Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that 

each state adopt and submit a SIP for 

the implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of each NAAQS 

promulgated by the EPA, which is 

commonly referred to as an 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. Tennessee, 

through TDEC, certified that the 

Tennessee SIP contains provisions that 

ensure the 2008 Lead NAAQS is 

implemented, enforced, and maintained 

in Tennessee. EPA received no adverse 

comments on its March 20, 2013, 

proposed approval of Tennessee’s 

October 19, 2009, infrastructure 

submission pertaining to section 

110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i), and section 110(a)(2)(J). 

EPA has determined that the Tennessee 

infrastructure submission, adequately 

addresses the PSD-related requirements 

of section 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of 

110(a)(2)(D)(i), and 110(a)(2)(J) of the 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
48808 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

5As described above, in a previous rulemaking, 

EPA took action on Tennessee’s October 19, 2009, 

submission for all other required infrastructure 

elements associated with the 2008 Lead NAAQS. 

See 78 FR 36440. 

CAA for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, and is 

consistent with section 110 of the CAA.5

III. Final Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve, 

Tennessee’s October 19, 2009, 

submission as demonstrating that the 

State meets the PSD-related 

requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C), 

prong 3 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), and 

section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA for the 

2008 Lead NAAQS because this 

submission is consistent with section 

110 of the CAA. TDEC has addressed 

the aforementioned elements of the 

CAA 110(a)(1) and (2) SIP requirements 

pursuant to EPA’s November 12, 2008, 

guidance to ensure that the 2008 Lead 

NAAQS are implemented, enforced, and 

maintained in Tennessee. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by October 11, 2013. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated July 31, 2013. 

Beverly H. Banister, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATIONS OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart RR—Tennessee 

■ 3. Section 52.2220(e), is amended by 

adding an entry ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 

Lead National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards’’ at the end of the table to 

read as follows: 

§ 52.2220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 155 / Monday, August 12, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 48809 

EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of nonregulatory SIP 

provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date/effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 

Requirements for the 2008 

Lead National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards.

Tennessee ................................... 10/19/2009 8/12/2013 [Insert citation 

of publication].

This approval is for sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

prong 3 of 

110(a)(2)(D)(i), and 

110(a)(2)(J) only. 

[FR Doc. 2013–19360 Filed 8–9–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990–0010; FRL 9846–2] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion 

of the Mosley Road Sanitary Landfill 

(MRSL) Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Region 6 is publishing a 

direct final Notice of Deletion of the 

MRSL Superfund Site (Site), located in 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, 

Oklahoma, from the National Priorities 

List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated 

pursuant to section 105 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is 

an appendix of the National Oil and 

Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct 

final deletion is being published by EPA 

with the concurrence of the State of 

Oklahoma, through the Oklahoma 

Department of Environmental Quality 

(ODEQ), because EPA has determined 

that all appropriate response actions 

under CERCLA have been completed. 

However, this deletion does not 

preclude future actions under 

Superfund. 

DATES: This direct final deletion is 

effective September 26, 2013 unless 

EPA receives adverse comments by 

September 11, 2013. If adverse 

comments are received, EPA will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final deletion in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

deletion will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–1990–0010, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: Michael Torres, Remedial 

Project Manager: 

torres.michael@epa.gov. 

• Fax: Michael Torres; Remedial 

Project Manger (RPM): 214–665–6660. 

• Mail: Michael Torres, RPM, US– 

EPA Region 6, Mail Code 6SF–RL, 1445 

Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202. 

• Hand Delivery: Michael Torres, 

RPM, US–EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross 

Avenue, 7th floor, Dallas, Texas 75202. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Docket’s normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990– 

0010. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statue. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in the 

hard copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: 

ODEQ Central Records, 405–702– 

1188, 707 N. Robinson, Oklahoma City, 

OK 73102, office hours: 8:00 to 4:30 

Monday through Friday. 

Ralph Ellison Library, 405–424–1437, 

2000 NE. 23rd Street, Oklahoma City, 

OK 73111, hours: 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 

Monday through Thursday, 9:00 a.m. to 

6:00 p.m. Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 

p.m. Saturday. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Torres, Remedial Project 

Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 6, 6SF–RL, 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202, 214–665– 

2108, torres.michael@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. NPL Deletion Criteria 

III. Deletion Procedures 

IV. Basis for Site Deletion 

V. Deletion Action 

I. Introduction 

EPA Region 6 is publishing this direct 

final Notice of Deletion of the MRSL 

Superfund Site (Site), from the National 

Priorities List (NPL). The NPL 

constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 

300, which is the Oil and Hazardous 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES