alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Roman GregorigRoman GregorigVice President and Principal Financial Officer E-3
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 54 (Monday, March 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6241]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-64,733


Modine Manufacturing, Truck Division, Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Staffmark, Lawrenceburg, TN; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 23, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Modine Manufacturing, Truck Division, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on February 10, 2009 (74 
FR 6652).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of charged air coolers, air filters, and oil coolers 
used in trucks.
    New information provided by the company shows that workers leased 
from Staffmark were employed on-site at Modine Manufacturing, Truck 
Division, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers at the subject firm who were adversely affected by the shift in 
production of charged air coolers, air filters, and oil coolers to 
Mexico.
    The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently 
under the control of Modine Manufacturing to be considered leased 
workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from working on-site at the 
Lawrencebury, Tennessee location of the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,733 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Modine Manufacturing, Truck Division, 
Lawrenceburg, Tennessee, including on-site leased workers from 
Staffmark, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after December 17, 2007 through January 29, 2011, are eligible 
to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade 
Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-6241 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-079 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Leslye Grindle, C.F.O., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 14, 2006              /s/ Leslye Grindle   Leslye Grindle, Sr. Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LAWRENCE SETH WAYNE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2310

[October 25, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura Johnson, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-1998-CF-001923-AXXX-MB.

Lawrence Seth Wayne, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CHARLESTON.

#### Burrough *v.*Ely and Others.

Submitted June 10, 1903.

Decided November 14, 1903.

1. Mechanic’s Lien.

A common law lien, on personal property for work and labor performed is the mere right of detention of such property until satisfaction of debt, and is not the subject of equitable jurisdiction or protection in the absence of statutory provision or other grounds of equitable interference, (p. *119).*

2. Mechanic’s Lien.

Such lien only secures to the lienor the right of possession and it is not otherwise enforceable. A sale made by him of the property would be wrongful, (p. 119).

3. Mechanic’s *Lien*— Sale.

For the deprivation of such possession, the lienor may maintain detinue or trover, or under execution -or attachment properly obtained, he may have sale of the property, (p. 119).

Appeal and *supersedeas*from the Circuit Court, Lewis Comity.

Action by C. E. Burroughs against Ralph H. Ely *et ails.*Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

*Affirmed.*

Edwabd A. Brannon and C. C. Htggenbotham, for appellant.

W. W. Beannon and W. B. MoGaey, for appellee.'

Dent, Judge:

C. E. Burrough appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of Lewis County rendered on the 27th day of March, 1902, dismissing a bill in chancery, filed by him against Ralph H. Ely and others, for the purpose of enforcing a common law-lien claimed by the plaintiff on a certain lot of lumber manufactured by him for the defendant Ely.

The first question that presents itself is as to whether such bill is maintainable. If not, the plaintiff’s remedies to determine and sustain his lien must be found in a court of law. *119The nature of the lien is only the right of possession of certain personal property on which work and labor has been performed. Hence there is no right of sale by reason thereof, either at law or in equity.

The right of possession is all that such lien secures which may be maintained by proper suit at law until the right of sale has been acquired either under execution or attachment.

If tire lienor is wrongfully deprived of his possession, he can maintain detinue for the goods or trover and conversion for their value to the amount of his claim. 2 Tucker’s Com. (3d Ed.) 83; -13 Enc. Plead, and Prae. 126.

In the absence of statutory provision to that effect, such lien does not authorize a suit in equity to sell the property for the payment of the debt.

Retention of possession is the full force of such lien and nothing more. To this extent alone it is enforceable and this by suit at law. 19 Amcr. and Eng. Enc. Law (2 Ed.) 34; 13 Enc. Plead, and Prac. 123, 126.

The decree is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PrimusGuaranty, Ltd., a Bermuda company (the"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Thomas W. Jasper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,Richard Claiden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                                      |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | to my knowledge, the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date: May 12, 2005

|  | /s/ Thomas W.Jasper Thomas W. Jasper Chief Executive Officer |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/ Richard Claiden RichardClaiden Chief Financial Officer |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### Israel Rosenberg et al., Infants, by Their Mother and Natural Guardian, Miriam Rosenberg, et al., Respondents, v Russell A. Scaringi, Defendant, and General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc., Also Known as General Electric Capital Auto Financial Services, Inc., Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 559]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about March 8, May 5 and July 18, 2000, which, in an action by three children to recover for personal injuries sustained when they were struck by defendant-appellant’s automobile, *inter alia,*denied defendant’s motions, namely: to compel one of the children to submit to a psychiatric examination, to compel the nonparty deposition of the children’s father, and to preclude plaintiffs from introducing any psychiatric testimony at trial, respectively, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*390Defendant’s motion to compel a psychiatric evaluation of the subject child was properly denied as belated and unnecessary. Defendant was or should have been aware of the child’s claim for psychiatric injuries long before it took his deposition, having been provided at the outset of the litigation with authorizations for the records of the various hospitals in which the child was treated, which records included a physician’s psychiatric evaluation. Notice of such claim was also given in plaintiffs’ bill of particulars, which was provided some two months before the preliminary conference at which the child’s deposition, and ensuing examinations by the neurologist and orthopedist identified in defendant’s previously served notice of physical examination, were so-ordered. Defendant should have urged, at the preliminary conference, that a proper evaluation of the child required that he be examined by a psychiatrist as well as a neurologist.

We also note that defendant’s neurologist, who in fact did examine the child shortly after the child’s deposition, prepared a report that was replete with comments about the child’s psychiatric condition, and, in an expert witness exchange, was described by defendant as prepared to testify as to “care, treatment, diagnosis, prognosis of any and all physical as well as emotional, psychological and/or psychiatric disorders, conditions or syndromes.” Thus, it also appears that an examination by a psychiatrist would be cumulative.

In view of the foregoing, defendant’s motion to preclude plaintiffs from offering expert evidence as to the child’s psychiatric condition was also properly denied. Nor did defendant show any unusual or unanticipated circumstances warranting the deposition of the children’s father after the filing of the note of issue (22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; *see, Karr v Brant Lake Camp,*265 AD2d 184). Concur — Williams, J. P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 214 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary 

Embolism Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2023 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. MURPHY, and Mr. 

TONKO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Deep Vein Thrombosis 

and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas deep vein thrombosis (referred to in this resolution 

as ‘‘DVT’’) is a condition that occurs when a blood clot 

forms in the deep veins of the body, most commonly in 

the leg, although it can occur anywhere in the body, such 

as the veins in the arm, abdomen, or around the brain; 

Whereas a potentially life-threatening complication of DVT is 

pulmonary embolism (in this resolution referred to as 

‘‘PE’’), where a blood clot breaks off, travels through the 

bloodstream, and lodges in the lung; 

Whereas DVT/PE is a serious, but often preventable, medical 

condition; 


rfrederick on DSKB3L4F33PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 214 IH 

Whereas DVT/PE occurs in an estimated 900,000 individuals 

in the United States each year; 

Whereas DVT/PE kills an estimated 100,000 individuals in 

the United States each year, more than HIV, breast cancer, and motor vehicle accidents combined; 

Whereas DVT/PE deaths are often preventable; 

Whereas DVT/PE is the leading cause of preventable hospital 

death in the United States; 

Whereas DVT/PE is a common complication in cancer patients and the leading cause of death in people with cancer after the cancer itself; 

Whereas pregnancy increases risk of DVT/PE, and that risk 

remains elevated for up to 6 weeks after giving birth; 

Whereas immobility, surgery, older age, a family history of 

clotting, and thrombophilia increase risk of DVT/PE; 

Whereas DVT/PE contributes to an estimated 

$10,000,000,000 in incremental medical costs each year 

in the United States; and 

Whereas the establishment of March as ‘‘Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month’’ would 

raise awareness about this life-threatening but preventable condition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘Deep Vein 

3 Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness 

4 Month’’; and 


rfrederick on DSKB3L4F33PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 214 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the importance of raising aware2 ness of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embo3 lism. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKB3L4F33PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH 31,
1997 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,634,685
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         396,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,323,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,009,978
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     94,587,311
<ALLOWANCE>                                    749,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,001,975
<DEPOSITS>                                 110,761,185
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,339,146
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,795,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             120,001,975
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,213,388
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               62,802
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                40,144
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,316,334
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             767,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             767,547
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,548,787
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   47,782
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,057
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,811,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,907
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     6.1
<LOANS-NON>                                    430,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    89,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,019,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               727,667
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   75,171
<RECOVERIES>                                    49,583
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              749,861
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           749,861
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>