666 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 4 / Wednesday, January 7, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

In 2005 a lateral runway excursion 

occurred on an A320 aircraft. Such 

excursions are classified as hazardous, with 

a large reduction in safety margins. 

Investigation has shown that the aircraft 

landed with the nose wheels rotated nearly 

20 degrees from center. During subsequent 

tests on the removed BSCU [Braking and 

Steering Control Unit], a BSCU hardware 

failure was found, affecting the monitoring 

function, including the system 

reconfiguration management, and leading to 

a runaway of [the] Nose Wheel Steering 

[uncommanded steering]. 

DGAC [Direction Ge ́ne ́rale de l’Aviation 

Civile] Airworthiness Directive (AD) F–1992– 

117–025(B), Revision 1 [which corresponds 

to FAA AD 94–24–07], mandated the BSCU 

upgrade in order to improve the steering 

logic, but this modification has shown not to 

be sufficient to address the identified failure 

mechanism. 

A software modification is now 

implemented in BSCU standard 10 which 

improves the system reconfiguration 

management when this failure mechanism is 

detected. 

BSCU standard 10 also includes other 

improvements—as detailed in the associated 

Service Bulletin. 

This AD therefore mandates the 

modification or replacement of the BSCU 

standard 7, 9 or 9.1, by the BSCU standard 

10. 

This AD also requires replacement of 

certain DUNLOP tires that are not compatible 

with BSCU standard 10. An uncommanded 

steering condition during takeoff or landing 

could result in departure of the airplane from 

the runway. 

Actions and Compliance 

(f) Unless already done, do the following 

actions. 

(1) Within 18 months after the effective 

date of this AD: Modify or replace the BSCU 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A320–32–1336, Revision 01, dated 

January 10, 2008; and inspect the airplane to 

determine if DUNLOP tires 46x16–20 having 

part number (P/N) 11659 T or 11661 T are 

installed. If those tires are installed, before 

further flight, replace with acceptable tires 

using a method approved by either the 

Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the 

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or 

its delegated agent). Accomplishment of the 

applicable requirements in this paragraph 

terminates the requirements of AD 94–24–07, 

amendment 39–9080. 

(2) Previous accomplishment of the 

modification or replacement of the BSCU 

before the effective date of this AD in 

accordance with Airbus Mandatory Service 

Bulletin A320–32–1336, dated September 19, 

2007, meets the requirements of paragraph 

(f)(1) of this AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ 

or service information as follows: Although 

the MCAI and service information do not 

provide procedures for replacing the tires as 

specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, this 

AD requires that you replace the tires using 

a method approved by either the Manager, 

International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, or the 

EASA (or its delegated agent). 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve 

AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send 

information to Attn: Tim Dulin, Aerospace 

Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 

98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2141; fax 

(425) 227–1149. Before using any approved 

AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC 

applies, notify your appropriate principal 

inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your 

local FSDO. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 

the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 

has approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2008–0048, dated February 28, 

2008, and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin 

A320–32–1336, Revision 01, dated January 

10, 2008, for related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

December 18, 2008. 

Stephen P. Boyd, 

Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–30 Filed 1–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Office 

37 CFR Part 201 

[Docket No. RM 2008–8] 

Exemption to Prohibition on 

Circumvention of Copyright Protection 

Systems for Access Control 

Technologies 

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of 

Congress. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

correction. 

SUMMARY: The Copyright Office 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 29, 2008, a notice pertaining 

to its triennial rulemaking proceeding in 

accordance with a provision of the 

Copyright Act which was added by the 

Digital Millennium Copyright Act and 

which provides that the Librarian of 

Congress may exempt certain classes of 

works from the prohibition against 

circumvention of technological 

measures that control access to 

copyrighted works. This document 

makes technical corrections to clarify 

the record of the proposed rulemaking. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob 

Kasunic, Principal Legal Advisor, Office 

of the General Counsel, Copyright GC/ 

I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 

20024–0400. Telephone (202) 707–8380; 

telefax (202) 707–8366. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Copyright Office published in the 

Federal Register on December 29, 2008, 

a notice of proposed rulemaking 

pertaining to the fourth triennial 

rulemaking proceeding required by 

§ 1201(a)(1)(C) of the Copyright Act. The 

notice contained a list of the proposed 

classes of work that the Office will 

consider for exemption from the 

prohibition against circumvention of 

technological measures that control 

access to copyrighted works. As 

published, the notice contained errors 

which could be misleading and/or 

require clarification. 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of December 

29, 2008, in Docket No. RM 2008–8, 

make the following corrections: 

1. On page 79425, in the third 

column, in the ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ section, 

line 12, the website address is corrected 

to read ‘‘http://www.copyright.gov/ 

1201/comment–forms’’. 

2. On page 79427, in the first column, 

paragraph 7 is corrected to read: 

‘‘Computer programs’’ [for forensic 

analysis]. Proponent: Glenn 

Pannenborg. 

3. On page 79427, in the third 

column, the third paragraph, line 6, the 

word ‘‘proceeding’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘preceding’’. 

Dated: January 2, 2009. 

David O. Carson, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. E9–61 Filed 1–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–30–S