Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 53 / Friday, March 20, 2009 / Notices 11967 

1Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane and Dean A. 

Pinkert found that the respondent interested party 

group response with respect to Korea was 

inadequate. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[LLAK910000 L13100000.DB0000 

LXSINSSI0000] 

Notice of Public Meeting, North Slope 

Science Initiative, Science Technical 

Advisory Panel, AK 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Land Policy and Management 

Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, North Slope 

Science Initiative (NSSI) Science 

Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) will 

meet as indicated below: 

DATES: The meeting will be held April 

14 and 15, in Fairbanks, Alaska. On 

April 14, 2009, the meeting will begin 

at 9 a.m. at the University of Alaska 

Fairbanks, International Arctic Research 

Center, Room 401. Public comments 

will begin at 3 p.m. On April 15, 2009, 

the meeting will begin at 9 a.m. at the 

same location and will be a joint 

meeting with the North Slope Science 

Initiative Oversight Group. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

F. Payne, Executive Director, North 

Slope Science Initiative, c/o Bureau of 

Land Management, AK–910, 222 W. 

Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, AK 

99513; phone 907–271–3431 or e-mail 

john_f_payne@blm.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NSSI, 

STAP provides advice and 

recommendations to the NSSI Oversight 

Group regarding priority needs for 

management decisions across the North 

Slope of Alaska. These priority needs 

may include recommendations on 

inventory, monitoring, and research 

activities that lead to informed land 

management decisions. The topics to be 

discussed at the meeting include: 

• Emerging issues summary from the 

STAP. 

• Update on the project tracking 

system. 

• Update on the project database. 

• NSSI priority issues and projects. 

• Other topics the Oversight Group or 

STAP may raise. 

All meetings are open to the public. 

The public may present written 

comments to the Science Technical 

Advisory Panel through the Executive 

Director, North Slope Science Initiative. 

Each formal meeting will also have time 

allotted for hearing public comments. 

Depending on the number of persons 

wishing to comment and time available, 

the time for individual oral comments 

may be limited. Individuals who plan to 

attend and need special assistance, such 

as sign language interpretation, 

transportation, or other reasonable 

accommodations, should contact the 

Executive Director, North Slope Science 

Initiative. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: March 16, 2009. 

Julia Dougan, 

Acting State Director. 

[FR Doc. E9–6097 Filed 3–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1310–JA–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–432 and 731– 

TA–1024–1028 (Review) and AA1921–188 

(Third Review)] 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand From Brazil, India, Japan, 

Korea, Mexico, and Thailand 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determination to conduct full five-year 

reviews concerning the countervailing 

duty order on prestressed concrete steel 

wire strand (‘‘PC strand’’) from India 

and the antidumping duty orders on PC 

strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, 

Mexico, and Thailand. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with full 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

order on PC strand from India and the 

antidumping duty orders on PC strand 

from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, 

and Thailand would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. A schedule for the reviews will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. For further information concerning 

the conduct of these reviews and rules 

of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: March 6, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

6, 2009, the Commission determined 

that it should proceed to full reviews in 

the subject five-year reviews pursuant to 

section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The 

Commission found that the domestic 

interested party group response to its 

notice of institution (73 FR 72834, 

December 1, 2008) was adequate and 

that the respondent interested party 

group responses with respect to Korea 

and Mexico were adequate 1 and 

decided to conduct full reviews with 

respect to the antidumping duty orders 

concerning PC strand from Korea and 

Mexico. The Commission found that the 

respondent interested party group 

responses with respect to Brazil, India, 

Japan, and Thailand were inadequate. 

However, the Commission determined 

to conduct full reviews concerning the 

countervailing duty order on PC strand 

from India and the antidumping duty 

orders on PC strand from Brazil, India, 

Japan, and Thailand to promote 

administrative efficiency in light of its 

decision to conduct full reviews with 

respect to the antidumping duty orders 

concerning PC strand from Korea and 

Mexico. A record of the Commissioners’ 

votes, the Commission’s statement on 

adequacy, and any individual 

Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the 

Secretary and at the Commission’s Web 

site. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules.