alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of our report dated March 13, 2008 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedules of Allstate Life Insurance Company
of New York (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to a change in method of accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes and accounting for deferred acquisition costs
associated with internal replacements in 2007), appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York for the year ended
December 31, 2007.

FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT NOS.       FORM N-4 REGISTRATION STATEMENT NOS.
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
         333-58512                                         033-65381
         333-100029                                        333-68344
                                                           333-81970
                                                           333-143228
                                                           333-94785

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
Chicago, Illinois
March 13, 2008
EXHIBIT 10.12


 


SUMMARY
OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS


 


 


Independent non-employee
directors of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (the “Company”) will
receive the following compensation in 2010:


 


·                  An annual retainer fee of $100,000;


 


·                  The committee chairpersons will receive
additional annual fees as follows:


 


	
  Lead
  Independent Director

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  35,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit
  Committee Chairperson

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  30,000

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation
  Committee Chairperson

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  Nominating &
  Governance Committee Chairperson

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  15,000

  	
   

  



 


·                  The committee members, other than the
chairpersons, will receive additional annual fees as follows:


 


	
  Audit
  Committee 

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  12,000

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation
  Committee 

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  8,000

  	
   

  
	
  Nominating &
  Governance Committee 

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  6,000

  	
   

  
	
  Pricing
  Committee 

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  6,000

  	
   

  



 


·                  Reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses
incurred to attend such meetings;


 


·                  A restricted stock grant of 1,574 shares
of common stock on January 4, 2010 under the Company’s Amended and
Restated 1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, such shares vesting as follows:
394 shares on January 4, 2010, 394 shares on January 4, 2011, 393
shares on January 4, 2012 and 393 shares on January 1, 2013.


 


The Company’s independent
non-employee directors may elect to defer all or any portion of the fees above
in accordance with the Company’s deferred compensation plan for its directors.


 


Directors who are also
employees of the Company will not receive any compensation for their services
as directors of the Company.
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of TierOne Corporation
(Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of my knowledge, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               June 30, 2005 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                                      
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Date:  August 5, 2005 | By:  /s/ Eugene B. Witkowicz         
|                      | Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive Vice  
|                      | President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  ClearOne
Communications, Inc.
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-148789 and 333-137859 of ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our
financial statement audit report dated September 2, 2008, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of ClearOne Communications, Inc. for the years ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007.
  /s/ Jones Simkins,
P.C.
  JONES
SIMKINS, P.C.
  Logan,
Utah
  September
2, 2008
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5506 

To preclude the acceptance of a driver’s license as a document establishing 

identity, for purposes of employment eligibility verification, if the State 

issuing the license permits use of a taxpayer identification number that 

is not a social security account number in the application process. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To preclude the acceptance of a driver’s license as a document establishing identity, for purposes of employment 

eligibility verification, if the State issuing the license 

permits use of a taxpayer identification number that 

is not a social security account number in the application 

process. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Accountability 

5 in Licensing Act’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5506 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRECLUDING USE OF TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION 

2 NUMBERS IN DRIVER’S LICENSE ISSUANCE. 

3 Section 274A(b)(1)(D)(i) of the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(b)(1)(D)(i)) is amended by 

5 striking ‘‘section;’’ and inserting ‘‘section, except that if 

6 a State permits an applicant for the license or document 

7 to use a taxpayer identification number that is not a social 

8 security account number in the application process, the 

9 license or document may not be used to verify employment 

10 eligibility under this section;’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leon Lamonte CORNELIUS, Appellant.

WD 80440

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: SEPTEMBER 11, 2018

Carol D. Jansen, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

*475Leon L. Cornelius appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute under Section 195.211, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2003, a class B felony. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

 
 
                         RCSB FINANCIAL, INC.
                    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                           NOVEMBER 30, 1996
 
                                          Jurisdiction of
Legal Name                                Incorporation or Organization
----------                                -----------------------------
 
Rochester Community Savings Bank          New York
     American Credit Services, Inc.       New York
     American Home Funding, Inc.          New York
         AHF Securities, Ltd.             New York
         AHF Subordinated Securities,     New York
          Ltd.
     Community Diversified Insurance      New York
      Agency, Inc.
     American Realty Finance Corporation  New York
     PM&F Services, Inc.                  New York
     RCSB Ventures, Inc.                  New York
         National Leeway Corporation      Delaware
         R/WDOC, Inc.                     South Carolina
         Rochester Fishkill, Inc.         New York
         Rochester Frenchman's Inc.       Florida
   RF Residential Funding, Inc.           New York
#### In the Matter of Sergio Perez, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[719 NYS2d 617]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot *(see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord,*243 AD2d 931).

Mercure, J. P., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
form10k-exhibit_4a5.htm


    Exhibit 4(a)-5

      AMENDMENT
NO. 4

       

      TO

       

      PPL
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

       

      WHEREAS,
PPL Services Corporation ("PPL") has adopted the PPL Employee Stock Ownership
Plan ("Plan") effective July 1, 2000, on behalf of various affiliated companies;
and

       

      WHEREAS,
the Plan was amended and restated effective January 1, 2002 and subsequently
amended by Amendment No. 1, 2 and 3; and

       

      WHEREAS,
the Company desires to further amend the Plan;

       

      NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

       

      I.           Effective
January 1, 2010, Section 2.20 is amended to read as follows:

       

      2.20      "Market
Value" shall mean, with respect to the Stock, the closing prices of the
Stock reported by the New York Stock Exchange for the third trading day
immediately preceding the date on which the Stock is contributed to the
Plan.

       

      II.           Except
as provided for in this Amendment No. 4, all other provisions of the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect.

       

      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 4 is executed this _____ day of
________________, 2009.

       

       

      PPL SERVICES CORPORATION

       

       

      By:_______________________________

      Stephen R. Russo

      Vice President-Human Resources

      & Services
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the three months ended March 31, 2004, I, Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      1)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three
            months ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
            section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
            the Company for the three months ended year ended March 31,2004,
            fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
            and results of operations of Plumas Bancorp.

   Date: May 14, 2003                   /s/ D. N. Biddle
                                      --------------------------------
                                      Douglas N. Biddle, Chief Financial Officer
(4910-13-P)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPfRTA nON Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 IDo~kct N,o.FAA-2010-0699; D1ircctorate Identifier 2009-NM~236-AD; Amendment 

# l'oSIO ;f..OIO· :1.3- 

# J 39-*****; AD 

### **><*_**_**1 RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; VikiI gAir Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by 

### {.(~

lfI(""""'I"OO~

Bombardier, fnc.) Model DHC-7 Airplanes N(IlAlS"lG

.~ i ~ i, .' J I " '.i' AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: f<inalll.llc. SUMlVlARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness dlrective (AD) for the products liste above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authOrit~ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation ProductJThC MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Viking Air Limited has c mpleted a system safety review ofthe aircral'i. fuel system against fuel tdnk safety standards introduced in Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manua~through Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 2002-043. The identified~on-compliances were then assessed using Trnnsport Canada Policy Letter No. 525-001, to detennine ifmandatory corrective action isrequir~d. . The assessment showed tJat supplemental maintenance tasks would be required toprevent potenLtalignition sources \vithin the fuel system, which could result in afu~l tank explosion. 

## * ** We are issuing this AD to reqUir~actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products. DHE 

## lif./i( JTll<GSnlOOI.

ROllTlNv51''''"'(. INLnAl.",''''

"';S"-MBOL
M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 3 of NUECES COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 30th day of July,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Dr. Mathew Alexander, M.D.,

Individually and as President of South

Texas Brain and Spine Center, and

South Texas Brain and Spine Center,

Appellants,

v.

Pedro Lomas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-15-00063-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 2012-CCV-61204-3)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to

the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and

REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are

adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 22nd day of October, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK

FILE COPY
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Magnitude Information Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form
10-KSB"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, to the best
of their knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-KSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  March 27, 2003         MAGNITUDE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                               By: /s/ Steven D. Rudnik
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Steven D. Rudnik
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer

                               By: /s/ Joerg H. Klaube
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Joerg H. Klaube
                                   Chief   Financial Officer




                                        1


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          22,608
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             220
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                84,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     96,956
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         509,663
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           498,573
<LOANS>                                      2,474,717
<ALLOWANCE>                                     29,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,300,262
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,763,967
<SHORT-TERM>                                   985,120
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             90,696
<LONG-TERM>                                    260,417
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,300,262
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                192,443
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               49,312
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               241,755
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             100,225
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             160,773
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           80,982
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,898
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (800)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 68,402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,246
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      19,246
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.57
<LOANS-NON>                                     16,125
<LOANS-PAST>                                        18
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   509
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                30,014
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    6,401
<RECOVERIES>                                       642
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               29,013
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            29,013
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
Amended & Restated Incentive Plan for Named executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.14 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CME GROUP INC. 
 INCENTIVE PLAN FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 This First Amendment (this “First Amendment”) amends that certain Amended and
Restated CME Group Inc. Incentive Plan for Named Executive Officers (as amended and restated as of December 31, 2008 and hereinafter, the “Plan”). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to
those terms under the Plan. 
  

	1.	Pursuant to Section 7(e) of the Plan, a new Section 7(l) is hereby added to the Plan, as follows: 

 (l) Recoupment. It shall be a condition of payment of an Award under the Plan that any Participant who holds the position of Executive
Chairman, serves on the Management Team or holds the position of Managing Director (any such person being referred to hereinafter as a “Covered Participant”) agree to the applicability of this Section 7(l) to any Award paid to such
Participant under the Plan as a Covered Participant. In the event that a Covered Participant receives a payment pursuant to the Plan and: (1) the payment was predicated upon achieving certain financial results that were subsequently the subject
of a restatement of Company financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (2) a lower payment would have been made to the Covered Participant based upon the restated financial results, upon the recommendation of
the Compensation Committee, the Board may, in its discretion, require such Covered Participant to repay all or a portion of the difference between the payment received by the Covered Participant and the payment which would have been paid to the
Covered Participant based on the restated financials (such difference being referred to as the “Recoupment Amount”). In order to collect the Recoupment Amount, the Board may require the Covered Participant to forfeit all or a portion of
any unvested restricted stock issued in respect of Awards hereunder, in an amount not to exceed the Recoupment Amount. The Company’s right to require repayment or forfeiture set forth in this Section 7(l) shall apply only if the facts
leading to a determination that a restatement is required are discovered within the three (3) fiscal years following the fiscal year with respect to which the Covered Participant is paid an Award hereunder. The Recoupment Amount shall be
determined by the Board in its good faith discretion and without regard to any deferral of Awards hereunder. The Committee may require any Covered Participant to execute an acknowledgement of the applicability of this Section 7(l) and an
agreement to comply with its provisions, in such form as the Committee may determine, as a condition to the receipt of any payment under the Plan. 
  

	2.	The terms of the Plan, as amended hereby, are confirmed in all respects and remain in full force and effect. 

  

	3.	This First Amendment is effective as of February 2, 2010.
Eric DETEL, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

WD 80902

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: September 4, 2018

Eric Detel, Appellant Pro Se.

Bart A. Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, Presiding, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

*32Eric Detel appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision that concluded Detel was ineligible for unemployment benefits because he left work voluntarily but not for good cause attributable to the work or his employer. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).