alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
W.B.N., Appellant, v. C.M., et al., Respondents.

No. ED 105027

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: October 24, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017

Lisl K. Williams, 4411 N. Newstead Ave. #17LL, St. Louis, MO 63115, For Plaintiff/Appellant.

Megen J. Campbell, PO Box 861, St. Louis, MO 63188, For Respondent/Appellant Missouri Department of Social Services.

Brian D. Dunlop, 7905 Forsyth Blvd., Clayton, MO 63105, Guardian Ad Litem for Juvenile.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

W.B.N. ("Appellant") appeals the decision of the trial court denying his petition to set aside the affidavit of paternity that established he was the natural father of A.M.N. ("Child") and to grant him relief from the existing child support order. In his petition, Appellant claimed that he should be granted relief because he only signed the affidavit of paternity and consented to the default child support order because Child's mother, C.M. ("Mother") fraudulently represented that Appellant was the only possible father. Despite DNA tests revealing a zero percent probability that Appellant was Child's biological father, the trial court found Appellant was not entitled to relief because he had failed to show Mother committed extrinsic fraud and, even if Mother did commit extrinsic fraud, Appellant was not entitled to relief because he was not free from neglect or fault.

Appellant offers three points on appeal. In Point I, Appellant argues that the trial court erred in that it misapplied the law by requiring Appellant to demonstrate that *752Mother committed extrinsic fraud, as opposed to fraud generally, and that Appellant had proven by clear and convincing evidence that there was a material mistake of fact. In Point II, Appellant claims that the trial court erred in concluding that Appellant failed to show Mother committed extrinsic fraud. And in Point III, Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in finding that his request for relief under Rule 74.06(d) was time-barred. We affirm the trial court's judgment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
# C_2017391EN.01000201.xml

| 18.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/2

---

Special Report No 17/2017

‘The Commission’s intervention in the Greek financial crisis’

(2017/C 391/02)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 17/2017 ‘The Commission’s intervention in the Greek financial crisis’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission. 

The Open Meeting Scheduled For Thursday, March 12, 2009, Was Cancelled.

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, March 18, 2009, 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor)

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, March 19, 2009, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

*Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-01:*                         Socialist Workers Party by counsel, Michael Krinsky, Esq., and Lindsey Frank, Esq.                    

*Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-04:*                         Al Franken for U.S. Senate and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, by Marc E. Elias, Esq.                    

2009 Legislative Recommendations.

Electronic Distribution of FEC Record.

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# Person to Contact for Information:

                        Judith Ingram, Press Officer,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 694-1220.                    

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-5879 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5623 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit the 

conversion of leadership PAC funds to personal use. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2006 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit the conversion of leadership PAC funds to personal use. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING CONVERSION OF LEADERSHIP 

4 PAC FUNDS TO PERSONAL USE. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 313(b)(2) of the Federal 

6 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 439(b)(2)) is 

7 amended by inserting after ‘‘subsection (a)’’ the following: 

8 ‘‘or funds of a leadership PAC described in paragraph 

9 (3)’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5623 IH

1 (b) LEADERSHIP PAC DEFINED.—Section 313(b) of 

2 such Act (2 U.S.C. 439a(b)) is amended by adding at the 

3 end the following new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(3) LEADERSHIP PAC DEFINED.—In this sub5 section, the term ‘leadership PAC’ means a political 

6 committee which is directly or indirectly established, 

7 maintained, or controlled by a candidate for election 

8 for Federal office or an individual holding Federal 

9 office but is not an authorized committee of the can10 didate or individual, except that such term does not 

11 include any political committee of a political party.’’. 

12 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

13 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

14 respect to elections occurring after December 2006. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
##### 



CAPITOL BANCORP LTD.  RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 st
 Award of Restricted Stock
 Terms and Conditions
 Contingent Vesting
 Restricted Period
 5% Earnings
    
    Percent ofDate
    
    Growth Requirement
    
    Award VestedJanuary 1, 2005
    
    2004 vs. 2003
    
    
    20
    %or2003 vs. 2002January 1, 2006
    
    2005 vs. 2004
    
    
    20
    %or2004 vs. 2003January 1, 2007
    
    2006 vs. 2005
    
    
    20
    %or2005 vs. 2004




---



##### 



5% Earnings
    
    Percent ofDate
    
    Growth Requirement
    
    Award VestedJanuary 1, 2008
    
    2007 vs. 2006
    
    
    20
    %or2006 vs. 2005January 1, 2009
    
    2008 vs. 2007
    
    
    20
    %or2007 vs. 2006
  Issuance of Certificates; Restrictive Legend
   Transferability
 Shareholder Rights
 2




---



##### 



Tax Withholding
 Death; Disability; Retirement; Termination of Employment
 Change of Control or Capital Structure
 3




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Conflicts
 Employee Bound by Plan
 Binding Effect
  THE EMPLOYEE:
    
    /s/ Joseph D. ReidJoseph D. ReidTHE CORPORATION:
    
    CAPITOL BANCORP LTD.,a Michigan corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Lee W. HendricksonLee W. HendricksonIts:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
 4




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
  Dated: August 1, 2003/s/ Joseph D. ReidJoseph D. Reid
Exhibit 15.2







Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
Ecopetrol S.A.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement (No. 333-190198) on Form F-3 of Ecopetrol, S.A of our report dated April 29, 2013, with respect to
the consolidated statements of Financial, Economic, Social and Environmental Activities, Changes in Stockholders’ Equity,
and Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is included in this annual report on Form 20-F of Ecopetrol S.A. for
the year ended December 31, 2014.



/s/ KPMG Limitada



Bogotá, Colombia
April 27, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1








HIGHLIGHT NETWORKS, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual  Report of Highlight Networks, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the period  ended June 30 , 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony Lombardo, Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Anthony Lombardo and will be retained by Highlight Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











Dated: September 23, 2010





/s/ Anthony Lombardo


Anthony Lombardo


President, CEO, CFO


(Principal Executive Officer)
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7559

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KRISTEN PATRICK DOYLE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:12

- cr
- 00039

- RBS

- TEM

- 1 ; 2:17

- cv
- 00567

- RBS )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kristen Patrick Doyle, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

U npublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kristen Patrick Doyle appeals the district court ’s order denying relief on his 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (20 12 ) motion

. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Ac cordingly, we grant leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (2012) , and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Doyle , No. 2:12

- cr
- 00039

- RBS

- TEM

- 1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2017) . We dispense with oral
arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* The district court construed Doyle’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion.
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of Cetrone Energy Company, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on the amended Form 10-K/A #3 for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Michael Cetrone, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael CetroneMichael Cetrone
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2009







1
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                        
|   



|Date: July 13, 2007
|-------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. R. 562

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To authorize the Government of Ukraine to establish a memorial on Federal land 

in the District of Columbia to honor the victims of the manmade famine that 

occurred in Ukraine in 1932–1933.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Government of Ukraine is authorized 

to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia 

to honor the victims of the Ukrainian famine-genocide of 1932–

1933. 

(b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMORATIVE

WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance 

with chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known 

as the ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’), except that sections 

8902(a)(1), 8906(b)(1), 8908(b)(2), and 8909(b) shall not apply with 

respect to the memorial. 

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES. 

The United States Government shall not pay any expense for 

the establishment of the memorial or its maintenance.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Order entered April 23, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00158
- CR FERNANDO MUNOZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. F 14
- 00579
- M



### O RDER
We GRANT Official Court Reporter Belinda G. Baraka’s April 20, 2015 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS J USTICE
EX-10.48






MEMORANDUM OF ASSIGNMENT




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	STATE OF TEXAS

	 	§

§
	 	

	 	

NOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
	COUNTIES OF HASKELL,

JONES, NOLAN, REAGAN,

RUNNELS AND TAYLOR

	 	§

§
	 	

§



	 	











This Memorandum of Assignment is made .and entered into as of the 1st day of August, 2007, by
and between PERMIAN LEGEND PETROLEUM LP, whose address is 3327 W. Wadley Ave., Suite 3, #267,
Midland, Texas 79707 (“Assignor”), and BASELINE CAPITAL, INC., whose address is 508 West Wall,
Suite 775, Midland, Texas 79701 (“Assignee”).



Assignor has executed and delivered to Assignee an Assignment of Oil and Gas Leases and Bill
of Sale dated of even date herewith conveying to Assignee an after “Payout” interest in the oil and
gas leases and lands described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof and in
the oil and gas leases and other oil and gas estates covering or affecting the lands described on
Exhibit “A” attached hereto, together with an undivided interest in all personal property
and equipment used or obtained in connection with such leases and lands. “Payout” is defined in
that certain Loan Agreement dated as of August 1, 2007 between Assignor and Assignee, as such Loan
Agreement may be amended, modified or restated from time to time.



Assignor and Assignee are executing this Memorandum for the purpose of placing the same of
record in Haskell, Jones, Nolan, Reagan, Runnels and Taylor Counties, Texas, and in order to
constitute constructive notice of the after Payout interest of Assignee in the above referenced
leases and lands.



This Memorandum may be executed in multiple counterparts for the purpose of recording this
Memorandum in each of the above referenced counties.



[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]





1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Memorandum is executed on the date of the acknowledgements hereto, to
be effective for all purposes as of the day, month and year first hereinabove written.




ASSIGNOR:




PERMIAN LEGEND PETROLEUM LP


By: Pemian Legend LLC, its general partner




By:/s/ Ronnie L. Steinocher




	 	 	Ronnie L. Steinocher, Manager






By:/s/ Lisa P. Hamilton, Manager




	 	 	Lisa P. Hamilton, Manager






ASSIGNEE:




BASELINE CAPITAL, INC.




By: /s/ Karl J. Reiter

Karl J. Reiter, President




	 	 	 
	STATE OF TEXAS

	 	§
	COUNTY OF MIDLAND

	 	§






This instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of July, 2007, by Ronnie L.
Steinocher and Lisa P. Hamilton, Managers of PERMIAN LEGEND LLC, a Texas limited liability company,
as general partner of PERMIAN LEGEND PETROLEUM LP, a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of said
limited liability company and limited partnership.




NOTARY PUBLIC — STATE OF TEXAS



	 	 	 
	STATE OF TEXAS

	 	§
	COUNTY OF MIDLAND

	 	§






This instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of July, 2007, by KARL J. REITER,
as President of BASELINE CAPITAL, INC., a Texas corporation, on behalf of said corporation.




NOTARY PUBLIC — STATE OF TEXAS




2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Coscia, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 80]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered January 19, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of scheme to defraud in the first degree, insurance fraud in the third and fifth degrees, grand larceny in the third degree and conspiracy in the fifth degree and, sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years and a conditional discharge, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(People v Norman,*85 NY2d 609, 621-622; *People v Steinberg,*79 NY2d 673), the evidence was sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt. Defendant’s pattern of conduct, viewed as a whole, had no reasonable explanation other than guilt, and the evidence amply established numerous overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy, some directly undertaken by defendant and others which are properly imputed to him *(see, People v Sorentino,*182 AD2d 418, *lv denied*80 NY2d 838).

The redacted plea allocution of a co-conspirator was properly admitted for the limited purpose of establishing the existence of a conspiracy *(see, People v Thomas,*68 NY2d 194). After an inquiry during which the declarant, represented by counsel, asserted his privilege against self-incrimination, the court properly determined that the declarant was unavailable. The declarant’s plea clearly did not protect him from the reasonable possibility of further State or Federal prosecution. Defendant’s claim that the prosecution procured the declarant’s *353unavailability is unsupported by the record *(cf., People v Scalise,*70 AD2d 346, 349). The declarant’s plea met all the requirements for admissibility as a declaration against penal interest, including the requisite reliability *(see, People v Poole,*277 AD2d 122).

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to charge the jury in language requested by defendant that would have amounted to unnecessary marshaling of evidence. The court’s charge conveyed the proper standards, which were capable of being understood by the jury without marshaling of facts.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that, to his
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  |  | 
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    PHILIP L.
HAWKINS
|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | Philip L Hawkins       
|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | Chief Executive Officer