alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 213 

Supporting the designation of March 2023 as National Colorectal Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2023 

Mr. PAYNE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of March 2023 as National 

Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month. 

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men and women combined in the United 

States; 

Whereas, in 2023, approximately 153,020 Americans will be 

diagnosed with colorectal cancer and approximately 

52,550 Americans will die from it; 

Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most highly preventable forms of cancer because screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before becoming cancerous; 

Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, 

when treatment works best; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 213 IH 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every individual aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60 percent of deaths 

from colorectal cancer could be prevented; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized 

colorectal cancer is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all 

diagnoses occur at this stage; 

Whereas colorectal cancer screenings can effectively reduce 

colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, yet, 1 in 3 

adults over 50 years of age are not up to date with recommended colorectal cancer screening; 

Whereas 1 in 23 men and 1 in 26 women will be diagnosed 

with colorectal cancer in their lifetime; 

Whereas, since 2011, colorectal cancer rates have been increasing by 2% per year in people younger than 50 years 

of age; 

Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on 

colorectal cancer prevention, screening, and symptoms 

are held during the month of March each year; and 

Whereas educational efforts can help provide information to 

the public of methods of prevention and screening, as 

well as about symptoms for early detection: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 213 IH 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe the month with appropriate awareness 

3 and educational activities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EX-10.1






	 	 	 
	VIA FACSIMILE AND EMAIL

	March 3, 2010

	 	

	Adamis Pharmaceutical Corporation

	2658 Del Mar Heights Road, #555

	Del Mar, California 92014

	Attention: President

	Re:

	 	Termination of Merger Agreement






Dear Dennis:



This letter is to confirm our agreement today to terminate the Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization among La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company, Jewel Merger Sub, Inc., and Adamis
Pharmaceutical Corporation, dated December 4, 2009. We regret that we have been unable to obtain
the approvals needed to consummate the merger and appreciate your efforts and investments made in
pursuit of this transaction. Upon termination, neither party shall have any obligations, financial
or otherwise, to the other party.



We wish you the best in your endeavors.



Sincerely,




/s/ Deirdre Y. Gillespie, M.D.

Deirdre Y. Gillespie, M.D.

Chief Executive Officer




Agreed and Acknowledged as of March 3, 2010



Adamis Pharmaceutical Corporation




By: /s/ Dennis Carlo, Ph.D.

Dennis Carlo, Ph.D.

Chief Executive Officer




cc: Kevin Kelso, Esq.
<page>					  EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.		The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and




<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  November 14, 2003    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman
                               Jeffrey A. Rothman
                               President,
                               Demeter Management Corporation,
                               general partner of the registrant
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 I 0 1 47

. ERI C J . RI VI ERE v

. THE STATE.

Eri c J

. Ri v i ere i s faci n g cri m i nal p ro secu t i on , an d h e fi led a m o t io n t o en fo rce

a p l ea ag reem en t an d a m o t i o n t o d i s m i ss o n co n s t i tu t i o n al s p eed y t ri al g ro u n d s

. Th e
t ri al co urt d en ied b o t h m o t i o n s o n Oct o b er 3 0 , 2 0 18

. On No v em b er 1 6 , 2 0 18 , t h e t ri al

co u rt i s s u ed a cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew, an d Ri vi ere fi l ed an ap p l i cat i o n f o r i n t erl o cu t o ry a p p e al

. Becau s e t h e cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew was n o t i s s u ed wi t h i n 1 0 d ay s , t h e ap p l i cat i o n was d i s m is s ed

. See Cas e Nu m b er A1 9 I0 1 2 4, d i s m i s s ed Dec. 2 1 , 20 1 8

. On Decem b er 2 8 , 20 1 8 , t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered an am en d ed
cert ifi cat e o f i m

m ed i at e rev i ew n u n c p ro t u n c t o No v em b er 8 , 20 1 8

. Ri v i ere t h en fi l ed
t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r i nt erl o cu t o ry ap p eal

.

“ A n u n c p ro t un c en t ry is fo r t h e p u rp o s e of reco rd i n g s om e act i o n t h at was
t ak en o r j u d g m e n t r e n d ered p rev i o us l y t o t h e m ak i n g o f th e en try , wh i ch i s t o t ak e effect as o f t h e fo rm e r d a t e

. Su ch en t ry can n o t b e m ad e t o s erv e t h e offi ce o f

co rrect in g a d eci s io n, h o w ev er erro n eo u s , or o f s u pp l y i n g n o n act i o n o n t h e p art o f t h e

co u rt .” Ba xt er v. Lo n g , 1 22 Ga. Ap p

. 5 0 0 , 5 0 1 (4 ) (1 7 7 SE2 d 7 1 2 ) (1 97 0 ). Th u s , “ [a]

n u n c p ro t u n c cert ifi c a t e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew i s wi t h o u t effi cacy t o s u p p o rt an ap p eal .” W

h i t l ock v. S ta t e , 1 2 4 Ga. Ap p . 5 9 9 , 6 0 1 (1 ) (1 8 5 SE2 d 9 0 ) (1 9 71 ). January 24, 2019Becau s e t h e t ri al co urt d i d n o t en t er t h e cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew wi t h in
t en d a ys o f en try o f t h e o rd er at i s su e, we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i d er t h i s ap p li cat io n , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/24/2019
Homer PHARES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105769

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: August 7, 2018

Christian Lehmberg, 1000 Wet Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Saint Louis, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Homer Phares ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction relief motion because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present testimony from a qualified psychiatrist at the guilt and penalty phases of trial that Movant was suffering from a mental disease or defect at the time of the *888crime caused by a series of strokes, and that Movant could not conform his conduct to what the law requires because of the brain damage he suffered from the stokes. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| January      13, 2011 |   |   | By:  /s/ Soren Nielsen                       |   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                  |   |   | Soren      Nielsen                                |   |   |
|                  |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer                      |   |   |
|                  |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |   |

----
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 15, 2005





MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke v. Jamil James Kantara

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 08 2

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 46281

Trial court: 311th District Court of Harris County

Ashley V. Tomlinson , c ounsel for a ppell ant , Mary Lynn Kantara Gerke, ha s filed a

m otion to w ithdraw as appellant’s counsel of record in this appeal. Appellant has filed a contest to the withdrawal of her counsel.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw does not contain a list of current deadlines and settings in the case and does not state that a copy of the motion was “delivered to the party in person or maile d

— b oth by certified and first

- class mail

— to the party at the party’s last known address.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(a)(1), (3),(b). The motion to withdraw is denied

.

A ppellant’s contest to the withdrawal of her counsel is dismissed as moot

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 3, 2014
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                            |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of China Timber Work Enterprise, Inc. |

| China Timber Work Enterprise, Inc. |
|------------------------------------|
|                               |   |
| By:                                | /s/ Wong Wa Kei Anthony |
| Name:                              | Wong Wa Kei Anthony |
| Title:                             | President, Secretary,Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Melford NEWLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106329

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: September 25, 2018

FOR APPELLANTS: Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENTS: Joshua Hawley, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before James M. Dowd, J., Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

*677Melford Newlon appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief. Newlon claims that the motion court clearly erred because his convictions on nine counts of the class C felony of stealing and his nine concurrent sentences of five years' imprisonment were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in *State v. Bazell* , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), and counsel therefore gave ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to dismiss the charges and by advising him to plead guilty. We affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

All rules references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2017).
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**FORM10-QSB**

**Section1350 Certification**

# **Quarterended March 31, 2007**

I, Thomas E. Fox,President and of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, thatto the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

(2)                                  Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated:  May 15, 2007
|   | /s/ Thomas E. Fox                            |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas E. Fox, President                     |
|   | (principal financial and accounting officer) |

 

----
exv10w5







	 	 	 	 	 



Ex. 10.5




EXTENSION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     This Extension of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement is entered into effective as of
this 1st day of January, 2010 by and between Thomas J. Morris (“Employee”) and Silverleaf Resorts,
Inc., a Texas corporation (“Silverleaf”). All terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall
have the meanings set forth in the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”)
between Employee and Silverleaf which was effective as of March 4, 2008 (the “Effective Date”).



RECITALS




     A. The Agreement was entered into effective as of March 4, 2008 and will expire under its
terms on December 31, 2009.



     B. Employee and Silverleaf desire to extend the Term of the Agreement for an additional
two-year period.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and terms hereinafter set forth, the parties
agree as follows:



AGREEMENT




     1. The Term of the Agreement shall be extended for a further two-year period and shall now
expire on December 31, 2011.



     2. No other terms or provisions of the Agreement are affected hereby and the parties hereby
confirm and ratify all other terms and conditions of the Agreement, including Employee’s current
base compensation of $325,000.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Dates of Execution: 	“SILVERLEAF”



SILVERLEAF RESORTS, INC.

 	 
	March 3, 2010 	By:  	/S/ ROBERT E. MEAD
 	 
	 	 	Robert E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	“EMPLOYEE”

 	 
	March 3, 2010 	By:  	/S/ THOMAS J. MORRIS
 	 
	 	 	Thomas J. Morris
**Exhibit 31.1**Certification of Principal Executive OfficerI, Peter A. Edison, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) [reserved](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        September 12, 2006 /s/ Peter A. Edison        Peter A. Edison        Chairman of the Board and     Chief Executive Officer     Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.     (Principal Executive Officer)  
24
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, J. Russell Porter, President and Chief Executive Officer of Gastar Exploration Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certify that theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

I further certify that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:November 4, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification of CEO under Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*I certify that this periodic report containing the issuer’sfinancial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andthat information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theissuer.*
|          | *By:*  | */s/ Keith C. Robbins*             |   |
|----------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|     |   |                               |   |
|     |   | President, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|     |
| * * | Date:  | August 8, 2007                     |   |   |   |
|          |        |                                    |        |  |  |  |  |

 

----