alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GENERAL MEDICINE P.C., et al., Respondents, v. James A. BROCKENBROUGH, M.D., et al., Appellant.

WD 80528, WD 80551

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 17, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 28, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied December 4, 2018

Jonathan Sternberg, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Ashlyn Buck Lewis, Topeka, KS, Co-Counsel for Appellant.

James Myers, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondents.

Dawn Parsons, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondents.

Michael Barzee, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondents.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Edward R. Ardini, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Dr. James A. Brockenbrough appeals a Jackson County Circuit Court judgment entered on a jury verdict finding that he breached his employment contract with General Medicine, P.C. and slandered the company by making certain statements to its customers. The court awarded General Medicine $1.1 million. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. for the interim period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.

Dated: August 15, 2005

/s/ Barry LamperdBarry Lamperd
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, 
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and will be retained by Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yonglin Du, President
and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 18, 2006


/s/ Yonglin Du
------------------------------------
Yonglin Du
President and Chief Executive Officer
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 54

AN ACT

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide

als, and for other purposes.reasonable standards for congressional gold med-

109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 54

AN ACT

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide reasonable

standards for congressional gold medals, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 54 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Gold

3 Medal Enhancement Act of 2005’’.

4 SEC. 2. REASONABLE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR CON5 GRESSIONAL GOLD MEDALS.

6 Section 5111 of title 31, United States Code, is

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section:

9 ‘‘(e) CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL STANDARDS.—

10 ‘‘(1) MAXIMUM NUMBER.—Beginning on the

11 date of the enactment of the Congressional Gold

12 Medal Enhancement Act of 2005, the Secretary of

13 the Treasury may strike not more than 2 congres14 sional gold medals for presentation pursuant to an

15 Act of the Congress in any calendar year.

16 ‘‘(2) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—The Sec17 retary may strike congressional gold medals only in

18 accordance with the following requirements:

19 ‘‘(A) RECIPIENTS.—Only an individual

20 may be a recipient of a congressional gold

21 medal.

22 ‘‘(B) TIMING.—No gold medal may be pre23 sented posthumously on behalf of any individual

24 except during the 20-year period beginning 5

25 years after the death of the individual (unless

26 the Act of Congress authorizing the striking of
3

•HR 54 EH

1 such medal was enacted before the death of

2 such individual)’’.

Passed the House of Representatives January 26,

2005.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 12


COMPUTATIONS OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Year Ended
                                                 December 31,
                                              ------------------
                                                 1997     1996
                                              --------  --------
<S>                                           <C>       <C>
Earnings:
      Earnings before income tax expense      $ 23,266  $ 19,246
      Add:
      Interest on advances and other
       borrowings                               78,424    60,548
      Interest component of rental
       expense                                     969       564
                                              --------  --------
      Earnings before fixed charges
       excluding interest on customer
       deposits                                102,659    80,358
      Interest on customer deposits             76,483   100,225
                                              --------  --------
      Earnings before fixed charges           $179,142  $180,583
                                              ========  ========

Fixed Charges:
      Interest on advances and other
       borrowings                               78,424    60,548
      Interest component of rental
       expense                                     969       564
                                              --------  --------
      Fixed charges excluding interest
       on customer deposits                     79,393    61,112
      Interest on customer deposits             76,483   100,225
                                              --------  --------
      Total fixed charges                     $155,876  $161,337
                                              ========  ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
 including interest on customer deposits         1.15x     1.12x
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
 excluding interest on customer deposits         1.29x     1.31x

</TABLE>
DISCOUNTED EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN AS AMENDED AND RESTATED



 Exhibit 10.13 
 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. 
 DISCOUNTED EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2002 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO

 Pursuant to authority granted to the Board of Directors of United Parcel Service, Inc., the Executive Committee of the
Board acting on behalf of the Board has adopted the following amendments to the United Parcel Service, Inc. Discounted Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to Section 15 thereof, to reduce the discount from 10% to 5% and to
change the date for determining the amount of the discount to the last day of the Purchase Period effective for shares purchased in Purchase Periods beginning on or after April 1, 2009: 
  

	1.	Section 3.6, Option Price, is amended to read as follows: 

 Option Price means for each Purchase Period 95% of the Stock Sales Price on the last day of such Purchase Period. 
  

	2.	Section 9(a), General Rule, is amended to substitute “95%” for “90%”. 

  

	3.	Except as otherwise expressly amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Plan as in effect immediately before February 2, 2009 shall remain in full force and
effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned certifies that United Parcel Service, Inc., based upon action by the
Executive Committee of the Board dated March 27, 2009, has caused this Plan Amendment Number Two to be executed. 
 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.


	
	
	/s/ Teri P. McClure
	 Teri P. McClure
 Senior Vice
President, General Counsel
 and Corporate Secretary
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241, AS ADOPTED 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

I, J. Russell Porter, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the “Registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 7, 2007
exv10wxcy






Exhibit 10(c)




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY

SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT PLAN




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Employees’ Retirement Plan
(the “Plan”) is effective as of December 31, 2010.



     WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective January 1, 2009;



     WHEREAS, Section 8 gives the Company the authority to amend the Plan at any time.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of December 31, 2010, as follows:




	 	1.	 	Section 2 is amended to add a paragraph at the end to read as follows:
	 
	 	 	 	Notwithstanding any provision in this Plan to the contrary, an individual shall be
eligible to accrue benefits under the Plan after 2010 only if:






	 	(a)	 	Participation. The individual is an employee of the
Company or a subsidiary eligible to accrue benefits under section 4.04 of the
Pension Plan after 2010; and
	 
	 	(b)	 	No Severance from Employment. The individual has not
terminated employment, as determined under the applicable policies of the
Company or its subsidiaries, on or after January 1, 2011.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed on December 21, 2010.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Campbell Soup Company

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Nancy A. Reardon
 	 
	 	 	Nancy A. Reardon 	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources

and Communications Officer 	 
	 


ATTEST:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Kathleen M. Gibson
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Jarman, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 829]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.), rendered May 12, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The People established a suitable chain of custody verifying that a latent fingerprint belonging to defendant was the same fingerprint that a police officer had lifted from a filing cabinet inside the burglarized premises. The alleged defects in the *276chain of custody were not significant enough to affect the admissibility of the fingerprint evidence *(see, People v Julian,*41 NY2d 340). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimusGuaranty, Ltd., a Bermuda company (the"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch  31,  2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Thomas W. Jasper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,Richard Claiden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|           |                                                                                                                                      |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | to my knowledge, the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

Date: May 10,2006

|  | /s/ Thomas W. Jasper ThomasW. Jasper Chief Executive Officer |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/Richard Claiden Richard Claiden Chief FinancialOfficer |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the knowledge of the undersigned, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 26, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 3, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ JoAnn A. Reed
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             |  | JoAnn A. Reed                                             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:            |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer





This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Eden Clark; Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bold Energy Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

1.

the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 (the “Report”), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| Dated:  August 22, 2012

By:

*/s/ Eden Clark*

 

 

Eden Clark

 

 

Chief Executive Officer and

 

 

Chief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of N.T., a/k/a N.P.T., a/k/a N.P.T., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105503

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

FILED: May 22, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 27, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Amy Marie Bartholow, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Josh Hawley, Attorney General, Christine Katherine Lesicko, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

N.T., a/k/a N.P.T., a/k/a N.P.T. appeals from the Judgment of the probate division of the circuit court, following a jury trial, finding him to be a sexually violent predator and committing him to secure confinement with the Department of Mental Health. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 31.1**

*Certifications:  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002*

*I,Keith C. Robbins, certify that:*

*1.**              I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Valley Bancorp (the “registrant”);*

*2.**              Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;*

*3.**              Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;*

*4.**              The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:*

*a)**                 Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;*

*b)**                 Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and*

*c)**                    Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting ;and*

*5.**              The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:*

*a)**                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and*

*b)**            Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.*
| *Date:*  | *November  10, 2006*                 | * * | *By: /s/ Keith C. Robbins* | * * |
|----------|--------------------------------------|----------|----------------------------|----------|
| * * | *President, Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----