alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robyn Owens, Chief Financial Officer of GenoMed, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GenoMed, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this quarterly
report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  for the small business  issuer and
have:

  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

  b.  evaluated the effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

5. The small business  issuer's other  certifying  officer and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

  a. all  significant deficiencies and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls which are reasonably  likely to adversely affect
the small business  issuer's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and report
financial information; and

  b. any fraud,  whether  or not  material, that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 22, 2004


/s/ Robyn Owens
----------------------
Robyn Owens
Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WILLIAM C. HOLMAN,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-19-00012-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1567363R) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
[No. 21873-2-III.

Division Three.

April 22, 2004.]

#### Al K. Lang, et al., *Appellants,*v. Walker’s Paving, Inc., et al., *Defendants,*Contractors Bonding & Insurance Company, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Stevens County, No. 01-2-00139-4, Larry M. Kristianson, J., entered February 27, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Kato, C.J., and Kurtz, J.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,376]


 Biotage, LLC, Charlottesville, VA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 25, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Biotage, 
LLC, Charlottesville, Virginia.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5918 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5503

AN ACT

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing located in high-cost areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5503 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Multifamily Loan 

3 Limit Adjustment Act of 2006’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE LIMITS IN 

5 HIGH COST AREAS. 

6 The National Housing Act is amended—

7 (1) in sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 

8 221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 231(c)(2)(B), 

9 and 234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 

10 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 

11 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B), and 

12 1715y(e)(3)(B))—

13 (A) by striking ‘‘140 percent’’ each place 

14 such term appears and inserting ‘‘170 percent’’; 

15 and 

16 (B) by striking ‘‘170 percent in high cost 

17 areas’’ each time place such term appears and 

18 inserting ‘‘215 percent in high cost areas’’; and 

19 (2) in section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III) (12 U.S.C. 

20 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III)) by striking ‘‘206A’’ and all 

21 that follows through ‘‘project-by-project basis’’ and 

22 inserting the following: ‘‘206A of this Act) by not to 

23 exceed 170 percent in any geographical area where 

24 the Secretary finds that cost levels so require and by 

25 not to exceed 170 percent, or 215 percent in high 
3

•HR 5503 EH

1 cost areas, where the Secretary determines it nec2 essary on a project-by-project basis’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5503

AN ACT

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the 

high-cost areas.gage insurance for multifamily housing located in mortgage amount limits applicable to FHA mort-
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Dover Holding Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank P. Crivello, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





March 22, 2011


/s/ Frank P. CrivelloFrank P. CrivelloChief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on her knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 9, 2005
|----------------------



| | /s/ Michelle A. GreenMichelle A. GreenChief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
exv10w23






Exhibit 10.23









A G C O  C O R P O R A T I O N



DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

for

NON —  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(as of January 1, 2009)



	 	 	 	 	 
	Retainers       (1)	 	USD
	Annual Lead Director Retainer (paid only to Lead Director):
	 	 	25,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Director Base Retainer (applies to all Directors):
	 	 	90,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	 	 	10,000	 
	(except Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Chair)
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Audit Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	 	 	20,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	 	 	15,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Additional Compensation
	 	 	 	 
	Annual AGCO Stock Grant Award (2)
	 	 	90,000	 





In addition, the Company will reimburse directors for the reasonable out-of-pocket expense incurred
in the attendance of the meeting.




Page 1 of 2









 










A G C O  C O R P O R A T I O N



DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

for

NON —  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

(as of January 1, 2009)


Notes:





	 	1)	 	Payment of annual retainers are made in accordance with the following provisions:






	 	I)	 	Annual retainer are paid quarterly in four installments (for ease of
calculation purposes quarters are divided into 90 days with a 360 day year).
	 
	 	II)	 	Annual Retainers accrue as of the first day of each calendar quarter
based on the Board and Committee Membership Roster in effect on that date.
	 
	 	III)	 	Annual Retainers are paid in advance during the first month of the
given calendar quarter (e.g., January for the first quarter).
	 
	 	IV)	 	Changes to Board and Committee Memberships (including Chairpersons)
will be reviewed and adjustments made to current quarters retainer amounts (up or
down).
	 
	 	V)	 	Any changes in the Retainer amounts due for the current quarter will
be reflected in the ensuing quarter’s retainer payment.






	 	2)	 	Terms applicable to the Stock Grant Award are defined in the Plan Document. The stock
grant equivalent to USD 90,000 is based on closing price on the day of the Annual
Shareholder’s ’meeting.






Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-605]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Savoy 
Senior Housing Corp., et al., No. 6:06-cv-31 (W.D. Va.), was lodged 
with the United States District Court for the Western District of 
Virginia, Lynchburg Division, on January 7, 2009.
    The proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Savoy Senior Housing Corporation, Savoy Liberty 
Village, LLC, SDB Construction, Inc., Jacob A. Frydman, Best G.C., Inc. 
(a/k/a Best Grading), and Acres of Virginia, Inc., for alleged 
violations of Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 
1311(a). The proposed Consent Decree resolves all allegations against 
the defendants for discharging dredged or fill material, and/or 
controlling and directing such discharges, into waters of the United 
States at a 140-acre property located in Campbell County, Virginia, 
without a permit issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. 
The proposed Consent Decree also resolves all allegations against the 
defendants for discharging sediment in stormwater, and/or controlling 
and directing such discharges, into waters of the United States on or 
from the same property, both without a CWA permit and in violation of 
such a permit once it was obtained.
    The proposed Consent Decree requires Savoy Senior Housing 
Corporation, Savoy Liberty Village, LLC, SDB Construction, Inc., Best 
G.C., Inc., and Acres of Virginia, Inc., to pay to the United States a 
civil penalty. The proposed Consent Decree also requires these 
defendants to restore certain areas on and adjacent to the 140-acre 
site, and also to fund off-site mitigation through the purchase of 
credits from stream and wetland restoration banks in the region.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
the proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Kenneth C. 
Amaditz, Trial Attorney, Environmental Defense Section, P.O. Box 23986, 
Washington, DC 20026-3986, and refer to United States v. Savoy Senior 
Housing Corp., et al., DJ  90-5-1-1-17868.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia in 
Lynchburg, Virginia. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be 
viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Russell M. Young,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E9-605 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-CW-P
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Reed J. Killion, President andPrincipal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

•                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

•                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | May 12, 2006 |   | By:    | /s/ Reed J.  Killion                                        |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   |   | Reed J.  Killion, President and Principal Executive Officer |

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and willbe retained by Uni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALEJANDRO LIMON-LOPEZ, aka

Alejandro Lopez-Limon,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-50147

D.C. No. 3:14-cr-01808-CAB-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 8, 2016** 

Pasadena, California

Before: SILVERMAN and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and DORSEY,*** District

Judge.

 

FILED

APR 12 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey, United States District Judge for the

District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
Alejandro Limon-Lopez, a Mexican citizen, was deported in 2007 as an

alien present without permission. Although Limon-Lopez’s 2001 conviction for

corporal injury on a spouse gave the government a second basis for his deportation,

the government chose to proceed only on the present-without-permission charge

because it lacked clear documentary proof of the date of his conviction. 

When Limon-Lopez was found in California seven years later, he moved to

dismiss his illegal-reentry indictment under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d), arguing that the

immigration judge (“IJ”) violated his due process rights by not advising him that

he was apparently eligible for voluntary departure. The district judge denied the

motion, and Limon-Lopez appeals. Reviewing de novo, we affirm.

To successfully challenge a deportation order based on an IJ’s failure to

inform an alien of his apparent eligibility for voluntary departure instead of

removal, the defendant must show that (1) the IJ’s failure violated his due process

rights and (2) he suffered prejudice as a result. United States v. Arrieta, 224 F.3d

1076, 1079 (9th Cir. 2000). “[A]n alien who is statutorily barred from obtaining

relief from removal cannot be prejudiced by an IJ’s failure to inform him about the

possibility of applying for [that] relief . . . even if the government does not

introduce noticeable documentation of the alien’s” disqualifying conviction before

the IJ. United States v. Bustos-Ochoa, 704 F.3d 1053, 1057 (9th Cir. 2012) (per

2
curiam). Because Limon-Lopez’s corporal-injury-on-a-spouse conviction

disqualified him from obtaining a voluntary departure, he was not prejudiced by

the IJ’s failure to inform him that he was eligible for that relief.

1 AFFIRMED.

3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

y1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143743 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143743 

 COA: 295982 

St. Clair CC: 09-001993-FC 

COLLEEN MARIE STURDEVANT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5528 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5528

     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
  jurisdiction over State laws restricting pornography, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Cannon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court 
  jurisdiction over State laws restricting pornography, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Pornography Jurisdiction 
Limitation Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction
    ``(a) In General.--No court created by Act of Congress shall have 
jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate 
jurisdiction, to hear or decide a question of whether a State 
pornography law imposes a constitutionally invalid restriction on the 
freedom of expression.
    ``(b) Court Precedent Not Binding.--A decision of a Federal court, 
to the extent the decision relates to a question described in 
subsection (a), is not binding precedent on a State court.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) The term `State pornography law' means a law of a 
        State or political subdivision of a State, to the extent the 
        law restricts a depiction, description, or display of nudity or 
        sexual conduct.
            ``(2) The term `State court' means a court of a State or 
        political subdivision of a State.
            ``(3) The term `State' means a State of the United States, 
        the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or 
        possession of the United States.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``1632.  Limitation on jurisdiction.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of EAU Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian D. Heinhold,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





DATE: May
24, 2010





/s/
      Brian D. HeinholdBrian
      D. HeinholdChief
      Financial OfficerEAU
      Technologies, Inc.