alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, James Z. Voss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.














Date: April 1, 2013


By:/s/ James Z. Voss


Name: James Z. Voss


Title:   Financial Controller





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and will be retained by Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 201 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 201

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit a Member 
who is indicted for an offense involving financial or campaign finance 
 fraud from receiving compensation for biographies, media appearances, 
        or expressive or creative works, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2023

Mr. D'Esposito (for himself, Mr. Molinaro, Mr. Lawler, Mr. LaLota, Mr. 
   Langworthy, and Mr. Williams of New York) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit a Member 
who is indicted for an offense involving financial or campaign finance 
 fraud from receiving compensation for biographies, media appearances, 
        or expressive or creative works, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``No Fame for Fraud 
Resolution''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MEMBERS INDICTED FOR FINANCIAL OR CAMPAIGN FINANCE 
              OFFENSES FROM RECEIVING COMPENSATION FOR BIOGRAPHIES, 
              MEDIA APPEARANCES, OR EXPRESSIVE OR CREATIVE WORKS.

    Rule XXV of the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``9.(a) A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner who is 
indicted for an offense described in paragraph (b) may not receive 
compensation, or enter into an agreement to receive compensation, for a 
biography, media appearance, or an expressive or creative work.
    ``(b) An offense described in this paragraph is--
            ``(1) any offense described in subparagraph (B) of section 
        8332(o)(2) of title 5, United States Code, without regard to 
        whether the offense is described in subparagraph (A) of such 
        section; or
            ``(2) any offense which is based on a violation of the 
        Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101 et 
        seq.)''.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 1970

HENRY OSAGI OSEMWENKHAE , Petitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : August 18, 2022 Decided: August 22, 2022

Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges.
Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Danielle Beach

- Oswald, BEACH

- OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Erica B. Miles, Acting Assistant Director, Bernard A. Joseph, Senior Litigation Counsel, O f fice of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1970 Doc: 27 Filed: 08/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Henry Osagi Osemwenkhae, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying Osemwenkhae’s 2018 motion to reopen his removal proceedings, which were closed in 2008. We have reviewed the Board’s order, in conjunction with the administrative record, and con clude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in ruling that the motion was time

- barred, s ee 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2022) , and that Osemwenkhae failed to substantially comply with the requirements of In re Lozada , 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (B.I.A. 1988), s o to excuse the
untimeliness of h is motion, see Barry v. Gonzales , 445 F.3d 741, 745

- 47 (4th Cir. 2006) (providing standard of review, discussing Lozada requirements, and explaining that this court will “only review the merits of the [Board ’ s] denial of a motion to reopen on the basis
of ineffective assistance of counsel where the [noncitizen] has complied with” those requirements) . We therefore deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by
the Board. See In re Osemwenkhae (B.I.A. Aug. 6, 2021). Osemwenkhae also challenges the Board’s refusal to exercise its authority to reopen his proceedings sua sponte. We lack jurisdiction to review how the Board exercises its sua sponte discretion. See Lawrence v. Lynch , 826 F.3d 198, 206

- 07 (4th Cir . 2016); Mosere v. Mukasey , 552 F.3d 397, 400

- 01 (4th Cir. 2009). We therefore dismiss the petition for review in part. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are USCA4 Appeal: 21-1970 Doc: 27 Filed: 08/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART USCA4 Appeal: 21-1970 Doc: 27 Filed: 08/22/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
November 17, 2015

STATE OF MINNESOTA 

IN SUPREME COURT 

A14-0774 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against 

Bradley Allan Lamb, a Minnesota Attorney, 

Registration No. 0391955. 

ORDER 

fl 

Om~EOF 

AJIIIB..lA'IECcuns 

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (the Director) 

has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Bradley Allan Lamb 

committed the following professional misconduct. He neglected and failed to 

communicate with a client, failed to provide that client with an accounting, and failed to 

refund any unearned fees to and provide that client with a copy of his file, see Minn. R. 

Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(c)(3), 1.15(c)(4), and 1.16(d), and he failed to cooperate with 

a disciplinary investigation. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.1(b) and Rule 25, Rules on 

Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). 

On June 5, 2014, we suspended respondent pursuant to Rule 12(c)(l), RLPR, after 

he could not be found in the state and the Director was unable to serve him with the 

petition for disciplinary action. In re Lamb, No. A14-0774, Order at 1 (Minn. filed June 

5, 2014). We provided that respondent had 1 year to move the court for vacation of the 

suspension order and for leave to answer the petition for disciplinary action and that 

failure to appear in this matter within 1 year would result in the allegations of the petition 

for disciplinary action being deemed admitted. !d. 

1 
On July 13~ 2015, we deemed the allegations in the petition admitted after 

respondent failed to move the court for vacation of the suspension order. In re Lamb, No. 

A14-0774, Order at 1 (Minn. filed July 13, 2015). We provided that respondent could 

file a memorandum showing cause why the court should not discipline him. Id. at 2. We 

also invited the parties to submit written proposals regarding the appropriate discipline to 

be imposed. Jd. 

Respondent did not file a memorandum in response to the order to show cause. 

He also did not file a written proposal regarding the appropriate discipline. The Director 

asks the court to impose an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for 

reinstatement for I year. 

Based upon all the files, records~ and proceedings herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Respondent Bradley Allan Lamb 1s indefinitely suspended from the 

practice of law with no right to petition for reinstatement for 1 year from the date of the 

filing of this order. 

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of 

suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs 

pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR. 

3. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), 

RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional 

responsibility portion of the state bar examination and satisfaction of continuing legal 

education requirements pursuant to Rule 18( e), RLPR. 

2 
Dated: November 17, 2015 

3 

BY THE COURT: 

David R. Stras 

Associate Justice
Exhibit 10.17.3



 Exhibit 10.17.3 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO SERVICES AGREEMENT (FIR-14088) 
 This Third
Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Services Agreement dated as of November 8, 2004, as amended (the “Services Agreement”) is made and entered into this 30 day of November, 2005 by and between Capital One Services, Inc,
(“Capital One”) and First Data Resources Inc. (“First Data”). For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Capital One and First Data agree as follows: 
 1. All terms set forth in this Amendment are effective as of November 30, 2005. 
 2. Section 20.3 d. (Compliance with Certain Applicable Lmvs and Policies) of the Services Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with: 
 (d) To the extent applicable to the Services or to First Data as a provider of the Services, First Data is and shall continue to be knowledgeable about the
anti-money laundering requirements and legal obligations toward combating terrorist financing as required by Federal law, including those requirements contained in the Bank Secrecy Act as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and all implementing
regulations, OFSI’s Guideline to B-8, Deterring and Detecting Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and shall perform the Services under this Agreement in compliance with such laws. First Data will ensure all appropriate personnel are
adequately trained on their anti-money laundering procedures, with refresher training provided no less than annually. 
 3. Article 21 (GENERAL)
of the Services Agreement is hereby amended by adding a new Section 21.11, OSFI, and re-numbering the remaining Sections accordingly. 
 21.11 OSFI. 
 (a) The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (“OSFI”) has the authority to exercise the
contract rights of Capital One relating to audit and monitoring rights. 
 (b) OSFI is authorized to access and make copies of any internal
reports, subject to OSFI agreeing to sign a confidentiality agreement. 
 (c) First Data will exercise reasonable best efforts to seek the
consent of external auditors for release to OSFI of any findings that address the Services being performed for Capital One, subject to OSFI agreeing to sign a confidentiality agreement. 
 (d) Capital One and First Data shall maintain a disaster recovery plan in the event of an unforeseen emergency impacting the delivery of Services, which may be revised from time to time upon mutual
agreement of the parties. 
 4. Unless otherwise specified in this Amendment, any capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the
meanings assigned to them in the Services Agreement. 
 5. As hereby amended and supplemented, the Services Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Services Agreement the day and year
first above written.
Shannon J. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81200

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: December 18, 2018

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Shannon J. Edwards appeals the denial of her amended Rule 24.035 motion which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel because *853trial counsel told her that if she went to trial she would likely be convicted and receive a sentence of 15 to 25 years, causing her to plead guilty in exchange for a 10 year sentence out of fear that she would receive a higher sentence if she went to trial. The motion court found that Edwards's guilty plea was not coerced. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
David A. MCKINNON and Denise C. McKinnon, Appellants, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS and Fred Weber, Inc., Respondents.

No. ED 106422

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: September 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 15, 2018

Alfred J. Rathert, Fenton, MO, for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Alexis L. Silsbe, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Respondent City of St. Louis.

Heather A. Bub, Patrick A. Bousquet, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Respondent Fred Weber, Inc.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

*406David A. McKinnon and Denise C. McKinnon appeal the trial court's dismissal of their suit to recover damages from the City of St. Louis and Fred Weber, Inc. Finding that the trial court did not err in dismissing the action, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Fresh Start Private Management, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Dr. Jorge Andrade, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Dr. Jorge AndradeDr. Jorge Andrade

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2011





1
Exhibit 99.3


                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Acto Digital
Video U.S.A. Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the Form10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2004


                                /s/ Joseph P. O'Connor
                                -------------------------------
                                Joseph P. O'Connor, President
                                (Chief Executive Officer of Ideal Accents, Inc.)


Dated: May 15, 2004

                              /s/ Ayaz M. Somani
                                -------------------------------
                                Ayaz M. Somani, Chief Financial Officer
                                (Chief Financial Officer of Ideal Accents, Inc.)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Ideal Accents, Inc. and will be retained by Ideal Accents, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.4


 


THIRD INSTALLMENT ELECTION


 


Reference is made to the Amended and Restated
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Eureka Moly, LLC, dated as of February 26,
2008 (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Limited Liability Company Agreement
of Eureka Moly, LLC, dated as of October 28, 2008, and Amendment No. 2
to Limited Liability Company Agreement of Eureka Moly, LLC, dated January 20,
2010, the “LLC Agreement”), between Nevada Moly, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“Nevada Moly”), and POS-Minerals Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (“POS-Minerals”). 
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein have the
respective meanings set forth in the LLC Agreement.


 


Nevada Moly and POS-Minerals agree that
notwithstanding anything to the contrary under the LLC Agreement, this document
is POS-Minerals’ Third Installment Election under Section 4.1(c) of
the LLC Agreement.


 


POS-Minerals hereby makes the Third
Installment Election to utilize Section 4.1(c)(ii) of the LLC
Agreement and thereby elects to reduce the amount of the Third Contribution
Installment from Seventy Million Dollars ($70,000,000.00) to Fifty-Six Million
Dollars ($56,000,000.00) without any corresponding reduction to its Percentage
Interest.


 


The parties hereto have executed this
document to be effective as of March 3, 2010.


 


 


	
   

  	
  POS-MINERALS
  CORPORATION,

  
	
   

  	
  a
  Delaware corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/Yong
  Keun Kim

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Yong Keun Kim

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  President

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  NEVADA
  MOLY, LLC,

  
	
   

  	
  a
  Delaware limited liability company

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/Bruce
  D. Hansen

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Bruce D. Hansen

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Executive
  Officer
**Exhibit32.1**

 

Certification of CEO under Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

*I certify that this periodic reportcontaining the issuer’s financial statements fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this periodicreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the issuer.*

 
|   | *By: /s/ Keith C. Robbins*          |              |
|--------|-------------------------------------|-------------------|
|   |                                |
|   | President, Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                                |
|   | *Date:*                             | *August 10, 2005* |   |
|        |                                     |                   |  |  |

 

----
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationEBS
Master
LLC
    
    DelawareEmdeon Business Services LLC
    
    DelawareEnvoy LLC
    
    DelawareMedE America LLC
    
    DelawareExpressBill LLC
    
    DelawareMediFAX-EDI Holding Company
    
    DelawareIXT Solutions, Inc.
    
    TennesseeDakota Imaging LLC
    
    DelawareDakota Imaging, S.A.
    
    Costa RicaCareInsite LLC
    
    MassachusettsMediFAX-EDI, LLC
    
    TennesseeMedi, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMediFAX, Inc.
    
    TennesseeMediFAX-EDI Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareMediFAX-EDI Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareClaims Processing Service LLC
    
    DelawareKinetra LLC
    
    DelawareIMS-Net of Arkansas, Inc. (1)
    
    ArkansasMinnesota Medical Communication Network, LLC(1)
    
    ColoradoEmdeon Clinical Services, LLC
    
    DelawareAdvanced Business Fulfillment, LLC
    
    DelawareMedE America of Ohio LLC
    
    DelawareInteractive Payer Network LLC
    
    DelawareThe
Sentinel Group Services LLC
    
    DelawareeRx
Network, L.L.C.
    
    TexaseRx
Audit, L.L.C.
    
    TexaseRx
Network Canada, Inc.
    
    CanadaEmdeon
FutureVision LLC
    
    Delaware
 
 (1)
    
    Less than 100% owned.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned executive officer of Minden Bancorp, Inc. (the“Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the threemonths ended September  30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|                                          | /s/ Becky T. Harrell                          |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          | Name: Becky T. Harrell                        |
|                                          | Title: Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |
|                                          |                                          |
|                                          |                                          |
| Date:   November 14, 2003 |

 

A signed original of this written statement as required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Minden Bancorp,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission staff uponrequest.

 

----
#### The State of Florida, ex rel., H. Leslie Quigg, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Henry R. Chase, Sheriff of Dade County, Florida, and His Deputies, *Defendants in Error.*

En Banc.

Decision Filed April 17, 1928.

*Price, Price, Neeley & Kehoe,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *II. E. Garter,*Assistant, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown . and Buford, J. J., concur.