alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12-2
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                  MCN INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (Thousands of Dollars)


                                               Twelve Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
                                                December 31, 1995     December 31, 1994     December 31, 1993
                                               -------------------   -------------------   -------------------
EARNINGS AS DEFINED (1)
<S>            <C>                                    <C>                   <C>                   <C>    
Pre-tax income (2) ....................               $19,376               $12,440               $ 9,588
Fixed charges (3) .....................                21,041                17,814                 9,307
                                                      -------               -------               -------
  Earnings as defined .................               $40,417               $30,254               $18,895
                                                      =======               =======               =======

FIXED CHARGES AS DEFINED (1)
Interest, expensed ....................               $14,376               $11,656               $ 4,464
Interest, capitalized .................                 5,895                 2,089                 1,579
Amortization of debt discounts, premium
  and expense .........................                   520                   289                    96
Interest implicit in rentals ..........                 6,145                 5,869                 4,747
                                                      -------               -------               -------
  Fixed charges as defined ............               $26,936               $19,903               $10,886
                                                      =======               =======               =======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges ....                  1.50                  1.52                  1.74
                                                      =======               =======               =======


<FN>
Notes:
(1)  Earnings and fixed charges are defined and computed in accordance with
     Item 503 of Regulation S-K.

(2)  This amount represents the aggregate of (a) the pre-tax income of MCN
     Investment and its majority-owned subsidiaries, (b) MCN Investment's
     share of pre-tax income of its 50% owned companies, and (c) any income
     actually received from less than 50% owned companies.

(3)  Fixed charges added to earnings are adjusted to exclude interest
     capitalized during the period and, therefore, may differ from fixed
     charges as defined.
</TABLE>
**Exhibit
23.1**
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-18217, No. 333-37040, No. 333-91882 and No. 333-91884, each on Form S-8 for
Vineyard National Bancorp, of our reports dated March 9, 2005
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Vineyard National Bancorp and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 and management’s assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual
report on Form 10-K of Vineyard National Bancorp.
  /s/
Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP
 
 Rancho
Cucamonga, California
 March 9, 2005
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130390 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130390 COA: 256300 Kalamazoo CC: 03-001012-FC ROBERT LEE DYSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
Doris HALEY, as Next Friend, FOR Marcus HALEY, Appellant, v. Steve COOK, Individually, and d/b/a Pizza Hut Hut Hut Team Camp, Respondent.

WD 80838

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: July 17, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 28, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied December 4, 2018

Thurlow D. Schauffler, Columbia for appellant

Johnathon C. Brereton-Hubbard, St. Louis for respondent

Before Special Division: Zel M. Fischer, P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Karen King Mitchell, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-Appellant Doris Haley, as next friend for her son Marcus Haley, appeals the Circuit Court of Saline County's grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Respondent Steve Cook (individually and doing business as Pizza Hut Hut Hut Team Camp). In her lawsuit, Doris Haley sought damages for injuries which Marcus Haley suffered during a summer football camp which was organized by Cook. On appeal, Doris Haley argues that the circuit court erroneously granted summary judgment to Cook, because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether Cook had *2breached a duty owed to Marcus Haley by failing to have qualified referees officiating at the camp's scrimmages; whether Cook's breach of duty proximately caused Marcus Haley's injuries; and whether Marcus Haley had assumed the risk of injury associated with participation in the football camp. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5950]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9441]
RIN 1545-BI46


Section 482: Methods To Determine Taxable Income in Connection 
With a Cost Sharing Arrangement; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a correcting amendment 
for final and temporary regulations (TD 9441) that were published in 
the Federal Register on Thursday, March 5, 2009 (74 FR 9570) providing 
further guidance and clarification regarding methods under section 482 
to determine taxable income in connection with a cost sharing 
arrangement in order to address issues that have arisen in 
administering the current regulations. The temporary regulations affect 
domestic and foreign entities that enter into cost sharing arrangements 
described in the temporary regulations.

DATES: This correction is effective March 19, 2009, and is applicable 
on January 5, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth P. Christman, (202) 435-5265 
(not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The final and temporary regulations that are the subject of this 
document are under sections 367 and 482 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, final and temporary regulations (TD 9441) contains an 
error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


0
Par. 2. Section 1.482-0T is amended by removing and reserving the entry 
of Sec.  1.482-7T(h)(3)(vi)(B) and revising the entry of Sec.  1.482-
7T(i)(6)(vi)(B) to read as follows:


Sec.  1.482-0T  Outline of regulations under section 482 (temporary).

* * * * *


Sec.  1.482-7T  Methods to determine taxable income in connection with 
a cost sharing arrangement (temporary).

* * * * *
    (i) * * *
    (6) * * *
    (vi) * * *
    (B) Circumstances in which Periodic Trigger deemed not to occur.
* * * * *

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
 [FR Doc. E9-5950 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 3.1.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                         OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


Three Shades For Everybody, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Three Shades For
Everybody, Inc. a resolution was duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment
of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said
amendment to be advisable and calling for consideration thereof and consent
thereto by a majority in interest of the stockholders of the corporation. The
resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

     RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be
     amended by changing the Article thereof numbered "Article IV" so that, as
     amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:

     The corporation shall have the authority to issue two hundred and forty
     million shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and sixty million
     shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001. The preferred stock
     may be issued in series, each of which may have such voting powers and such
     designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
     special rights, and qualifications, or restrictions thereof, as shall be
     stated in the resolutions providing for the issue of such stock adopted by
     the board of directors pursuant to authority expressly vested in it by this
     provision of its certificate of incorporation.

SECOND: That thereafter, written consents for the above amendment were obtained
from a majority in interest of the stockholders in accordance with Section 228
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

FOURTH: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by
reason of said amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Three Shades For
Everybody, Inc. has caused this certificate to be signed by Daniel C. Masters,
an Authorized Officer, this 25th day of June, 2010.


By: /s/ Daniel C. Masters
    ------------------------------------
    Daniel C. Masters, President
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Ideal Accents, Inc., a Florida
      corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Ideal Accents, Inc., and will be retained by Ideal Accents, Inc. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.







*/S/
      Karim
      Suleman*


Karim
      Suleman, Chief Executive Officer,


President,
      Director and Chief Financial


Officer





Date:
      November 20, 2006
# L.L ~A~ 

# I7U~ It's A Brand New Day! ~~ Mr. Michael Gormas Office of Aviation Analysis Essential Air Service 1200 New JerseyAvenue Washington DC20590 

# City ofHuron 239Wisconsin Ave SW • PO Box 1369 • Huron, SO57350

Ph 605.353.8502• Fx 605.353.8506

.'
-: J ':'J 

## ,- 

# -- ::--,
Re: Docket DOT-OST-2000-7138 DearSir: 27 May 2014 

# ~:- :..

.. Y! ,-'

After carefully reviewing the proposals forwarded by Boutique Air and Great LakesAviation, the City of Huron and the Huron Airport Governing Board would respectfully request that the Bid submitted by Great LakesAviation be accepted for the EA5contract period beginning October 1st of this year. Although we have recently seen cancellation rates exceeding 50%from Great Lakeswe believe that the ability to interline baggagewith other carriers along with the agreements that they have in place with Delta, Frontier and United far outweigh the difference in requested subsidy between them and Boutique Air. We do understand that current problems with Lakesaswell as numerous other carriers are related to the "1500 Hour Rule" that went into effect lastyear and therefore should eventually lessen and thus improve the reliability of Great Lakes. However, with the increase in operating subsidy requested by Great Lakesaswell asits intended 9 passenger operation we would expect to seemuch better fares and reliability to offset the change in operation. Although the proposal submitted by Boutique Air was attractive, we have experienced the problems associated with carriers that have no ability to interline baggageor anytype of code share type agreement and have found that those reasons do in fact keep passengers away. We also understand that Boutique Air also does not currently have anygates available at MSPwhich also complicates matters. Forthose reasons alone we do prefer the bid submitted by Great LakesAviation and respectfully request that you select them for our next contract. Ifyou have any questions please feel free to contact usat anytime. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely,

PaulAylward, Mayor Huron, South Dakota
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5428 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

202 East Washington Street in Morris, Illinois, as the ‘‘Joshua A. 

Terando Princeton Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. WELLER (for himself, Mr. RUSH, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. LIPINSKI, 

Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. HYDE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. 

BEAN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. KIRK, Mr. COSTELLO, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. EVANS, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. 

SHIMKUS, and Mr. HASTERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 202 East Washington Street in Morris, Illinois, as the ‘‘Joshua A. Terando Princeton Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOSHUA A. TERANDO PRINCETON POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 202 East Washington Street in 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5428 IH

1 Morris, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Joshua A. Terando Princeton Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joshua A. Terando 

7 Princeton Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Bonus Plan for Executive Officers



 EXHIBIT 10(iii).5 
 BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY 
 BONUS PLAN 

FOR OFFICERS AND KEY MANAGERS 
 Plan Administration 
 The Board of Directors (“Board”) of the Company has sole responsibility for adopting,
reviewing and revising the Company’s Bonus Plan (“Plan”) and all its provisions. 
 Plan Participants 

Participants are Officers and Key Managers of the Company as approved by the Board annually. Participation in the Plan does not constitute a guarantee of
employment and incentive awards for Plan participants whose employment is terminated for any reason shall forfeit their rights to any bonus payment. Participants who retire or go on disability during the Plan year will not normally receive a
prorated bonus payment. 
 Bonus Payment Date 
 The bonus will be paid in a lump sum as soon as practical after the Company’s financial results for the applicable year have been certified by the external auditors. 
 Bonus Formula 
 Bonus amounts, as a
percentage of base compensation, are earned by the participants based upon achieving target and stretch goals for two independent components – net sales and net earnings. Fifty percent (50%) of the bonus amount earned is based on achieving
pre-set net sales goals and fifty percent (50%) of the bonus amount earned is based on achieving pre-set net earnings goals. The specific goals of the Plan will be determined on an annual basis by the Board. 
 Component 1 – Net Sales 
 For net sales
below target, 0% bonus is earned. For net sales at or above target, the bonus amount will be earned on a pro-rata basis. 
 Component 2
– Net Earnings 
 For net earnings below target, 0% bonus is earned. For net earnings at or above target, the bonus amount will be
earned on a pro-rata basis, except that that the Board has the discretion to cap the bonus amount earned.
Unassociated Document


    
      Exhibit
10.26

    

     

    CapLease,
Inc.

    Summary
of Compensation to

    Independent
Directors

     

    
      	 
      	 	
              
                2010

              

            	 
	
              Annual
      cash
      retainer                                                                      

            	 	$	35,000	 	 	 
	
              Committee
      chair additional
      retainer                                                                      

            	 	$	6,000	(1)	
            	 
	
              Lead
      independent director
      retainer                                                                      

            	 	$	10,000	 	 	 
	
              Stock
      award                                                                      

            	 	$	32,400	(2)	 	 
	Board
      attendance fee (in person or telephonic)	 	$	2,000	 	per
      meeting	 
	Committee
      attendance fee (in person or telephonic)	 	$	1,000	 	per
      meeting	(3) 


    

    
       

      
        
 

    

    (1)Except
for our audit committee chair, who receives $10,000.

     

    (2)Except
for our audit committee chair, who receives $38,700.  The number of
shares granted will be determined by dividing the stock award value by the
average closing price for the Company’s common stock for the 10 trading days
immediately prior to the date the committee makes annual stock
awards.  Awards will be effective on the anniversary of the Company’s
initial public offering and will vest in three equal annual installments
beginning on the first anniversary of such date.

     

    (3)Committee
attendance fees are not paid for meetings held on the same day as a Board
meeting.
Selous R. RASHAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106133

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: November 13, 2018

Alexandria A. Shah, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.

Daniel N. McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Selous R. Rashad appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2014) motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*919We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11171-11172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03596]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9007-6]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 02/04/2013 Through 02/08/2013
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.
EIS No. 20130026, Final EIS, USFWS, TX, Edwards Aquifer Recovery 
Implementation Program Habitat Conservation Plan, Review Period Ends: 
03/18/2013, Contact: Adam Zerrenner 512-490-0057.

[[Page 11172]]

EIS No. 20130027, Final EIS, USFWS, AK, Izembek National Wildlife 
National Wildlife Refuge Land Exchange/Road Corridor, Review Period 
Ends: 03/18/2013, Contact: Stephanie Brady 907-306-7448.
EIS No. 20130028, Draft EIS, AFS, AZ, Programmatic--Apache-Sitgreaves 
National Forests Land Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 05/17/2013, 
Contact: Michelle Davalos 928-333-6334.
EIS No. 20130029, Draft EIS, NPS, 00, Cottonwood Cove and Katherine 
Landing Draft Development Concept Plans, Lake Mead National Recreation 
Area, NV, AZ, Comment Period Ends: 04/16/2013, Contact: Greg Jarvis 
303-969-2263.
EIS No. 20130030, Final EIS, USFS, OR, Mt. Bachelor Ski Area 
Improvements Project, Review Period Ends: 03/18/2013, Contact: Amy 
Tinderholt 541-383-4708.
EIS No. 20130031, Draft EIS, USN, CA, U.S. Navy F-35C West Coast 
Homebasing, Comment Period Ends: 04/22/2013, Contact: Amy Kelley 619-
532-2799.
EIS No. 20130032, Final EIS, BLM, CA, Alta East Wind Project, Proposed 
Plan Amendment, Comment Period Ends: 03/18/2013, Contact: Jeffery K. 
Childers 951-697-5308.
EIS No. 20130033, Draft Supplement, USFS, CA, Southern California 
National Forests Land Management Plan Amendment, Comment Period Ends: 
05/17/2013, Contact: Robert Hawkins 916-849-8037.

    Dated: February 12, 2013.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013-03596 Filed 2-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```