Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 36655 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2014–0375] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Eighth Coast Guard District Annual 

Safety Zones; Oakmont Yacht Club 

Fireworks; Allegheny River Mile 11.75 

to 12.25; Pittsburgh, PA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of 

regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

a safety zone for the Oakmont Yacht 

Club Fireworks on the Allegheny River, 

from mile 11.75 to 12.25, extending the 

entire width of the river. This zone will 

be in effect on July 19, 2014 from 9:30 

p.m. until 10:30 p.m. This zone is 

needed to protect vessels transiting the 

area and event spectators from the 

hazards associated with the Oakmont 

Yacht Club Fireworks. During the 

enforcement period, entry into, 

transiting, or anchoring in the safety 

zone is prohibited to all vessels not 

registered with the sponsor as 

participants or official patrol vessels, 

unless specifically authorized by the 

Captain of the Port (COTP) Pittsburgh or 

a designated representative. 

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 

165.801 will be enforced on July 19, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice of 

enforcement, call or email Ronald 

Lipscomb, Marine Safety Unit 

Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard, at 

telephone (412) 644–5808, email 

Ronald.c.lipscomb1@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce the Safety Zone for 

the annual Oakmont Yacht Club 

Fireworks listed in 33 CFR 165.801 

Table 1, Table No. 42; Sector Ohio 

Valley. 

Under the provisions of C33 CFR 

165.801, entry into the safety zone listed 

in Table 1, Table No. 42; Sector Ohio 

Valley, is prohibited unless authorized 

by the Captain of the Port or a 

designated representative. Persons or 

vessels desiring to enter into or passage 

through the safety zone must request 

permission from the Captain of the Port 

Pittsburgh or a designated 

representative. If permission is granted, 

all persons and vessels shall comply 

with the instructions of the Captain of 

the Port Pittsburgh or designated 

representative. 

This notice is issued under authority 

of 5 U.S.C. 552 (a); 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 

U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 

U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 

6.04–6, and 160.5; Public Law 107–295, 

116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland 

Security Delegation No. 0170.1. In 

addition to this notice in the Federal 

Register, the Coast Guard will provide 

the maritime community with advance 

notification of this enforcement period 

via Local Notice to Mariners and 

updates via Marine Information 

Broadcasts. 

If the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or 

designated representative determines 

that the Safety Zone need not be 

enforced for the full duration stated in 

this notice of enforcement, he or she 

may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners 

to grant general permission to enter the 

regulated area. 

Dated: June 4, 2014. 

L.N. Weaver, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of 

the Port, Pittsburgh. 

[FR Doc. 2014–15135 Filed 6–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0602; FRL–9912–83– 

Region–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans for North 

Carolina: State Implementation Plan 

Miscellaneous Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve the portions of a revision to the 

North Carolina State Implementation 

Plan (SIP), submitted by the North 

Carolina Department of Environment 

and Natural Resources (NC DENR) on 

February 3, 2010, that incorporate 

changes to the state rules reflecting the 

2006 national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS) for particulate 

matter (PM). EPA approved the 

remaining portions of North Carolina’s 

February 3, 2010, SIP revision in a 

previous rulemaking. 

DATES: This rule will be effective on July 

30, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2007–0602. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nacosta Ward, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9140. 

Ms. Ward can be reached via electronic 

mail at ward.nacosta@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. This Action 

II. Background 

III. Response to Comments 

IV. Final Action 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. This Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

the portions of North Carolina’s 

February 3, 2010, SIP revision that 

relate to the PM2.5 and PM10 NAAQS 

(collectively referred to as the ‘‘PM 

NAAQS’’). On May 16, 2013, EPA 

published a direct final rule approving 

the portions of North Carolina’s 

February 3, 2010, submission that 

incorporate amendments to state rules 

15A NCAC 02D .0405, .0408, .0409, and 

.0410 reflecting the NAAQS for ozone, 

lead, and PM in effect at the time of 

submittal. See 78 FR 28747. 

EPA published an accompanying 

proposed approval to the May 16, 2013, 

direct final rule in the event that EPA 

received adverse comment and 

withdrew the direct final rulemaking. 

See 78 FR 28775. In the direct final rule, 

EPA stated that if adverse comments 

were received by June 17, 2013, the rule 

would be withdrawn and not take effect, 

the proposed rule would remain in 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
36656 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

1On December 14, 2012, EPA strengthened the 

primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS to 12.0 mg/m3 and 

retained the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS at 35 mg/m3. See 

78 FR 3086 (January 15, 2013). 

effect, and an additional public 

comment period would not be 

instituted. 

On May 23, 2013, EPA received 

comments from a single commenter 

solely on the portions of the rulemaking 

related to the PM2.5 NAAQS; therefore, 

EPA withdrew the PM portions of the 

direct final rule. See 78 FR 41850 (July 

12, 2013). The withdrawal of the PM 

portions did not affect EPA’s May 16, 

2013, direct final action on North 

Carolina’s SIP revisions related to the 

ozone and lead NAAQS. EPA is now 

taking final action to approve only the 

portions of the February 3, 2010, SIP 

revision related to the PM NAAQS. EPA 

has reviewed the changes to North 

Carolina Rules 15A NCAC 02D .0410 

‘‘PM2.5 Particulate Matter’’ and 15A 

NCAC 02D .0409 ‘‘PM10 Particulate 

Matter’’ and determined that these 

changes are consistent with federal 

regulations in effect at the time of SIP 

submission; thus, EPA is approving 

these revisions to the North Carolina 

SIP. 

II. Background 

EPA approved a North Carolina’s SIP 

revision on October 22, 2002, that 

adopted the 1997 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS 

and 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS set at 65 

micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3) and 

15 mg/m3, respectively. See 67 FR 

64990. On October 17, 2006, EPA 

revised the 24 hour PM2.5 NAAQS to 35 

mg/m3 and retained the annual PM2.5

NAAQS at 15 mg/m3.1 See 71 FR 61144. 

Accordingly, NC DNER submitted a SIP 

revision on February 3, 2010, that, 

among other things, incorporates 

revisions to state rule 15A NCAC 02D 

.0410 ‘‘PM2.5 Particulate Matter’’ that 

update the rule for consistency with the 

2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. 

EPA approved a North Carolina SIP 

revision on January 16, 1990, that 

adopted the initial 1987 24-hour PM10

NAAQS and 1987 annual PM10 NAAQS 

set at 150 mg/m3 and 50 mg/m3, 

respectively. See 55 FR 1419. On 

October 17, 2006, EPA retained the 24- 

hour PM10 NAAQS at 150 mg/m3 and 

revoked the annual PM10 NAAQS. See 

71 FR 61144. Accordingly, in the 

February 3, 2010, SIP submission, NC 

DENR incorporated revisions to state 

rule 15A NCAC 02D .0409 ‘‘PM10

Particulate Matter’’ that update the rule 

for consistency with the 2006 PM10

NAAQS. 

III. Response to Comments 

On May 23, 2013, EPA received a 

comment from one member of the 

general public. While the comment was 

generally in support of EPA’s action, 

EPA withdrew the direct final rule 

because the comment could be 

interpreted as adverse. A summary of 

the comment and EPA’s response is 

provided below. 

Comment: The commenter noted that 

EPA revised the PM2.5 NAAQS in 2012, 

and he recommended that EPA 

‘‘approve the SIPs as submitted, with a 

further recommendation to submit a 

revised SIP reflecting the new standard 

within a reasonable amount of time (as 

determined by EPA).’’ 

Response: Although EPA recently 

updated the annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 

State submitted its SIP revision prior to 

the December 14, 2012, promulgation of 

the new standard, published on January 

15, 2013 (see 78 FR 3086). As 

mentioned above, NC DENR submitted 

its SIP revision to update the PM 

NAAQS on February 3, 2010, in 

response to EPA’s promulgation of the 

2006 PM NAAQS. EPA believes that it 

is appropriate to approve North 

Carolina’s February 3, 2010, SIP 

revision, as it reflects the PM NAAQS in 

effect at that time, these NAAQS remain 

in effect, and the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS 

was not promulgated at that time. EPA 

notes that today’s action does not 

relieve North Carolina of any current or 

future requirements regarding the 2012 

PM2.5 NAAQS and that NC DENR is 

currently working on a SIP submittal to 

adopt the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is approving the portions of 

North Carolina’s February 3, 2010, SIP 

revision that relate to the PM NAAQS 

because they are consistent with the PM 

NAAQS in effect at the time of 

submittal. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by State law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian 

country, and EPA notes that it will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 36657 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by August 29, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Particulate Matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: June 16, 2014. 

Heather McTeer Toney, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42. U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart II—North Carolina 

■ 2. Section 52.1770 (c) is amended 

under Table 1, at Subchapter 2D Air 

Pollution Control Requirements, Section 

.0400 Ambient Air Quality Standards by 

revising the entries for ‘‘.0409,’’ and 

‘‘.0410’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.1770 Identification of plan 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

TABLE 1—EPA APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements 

*******

Section .0400 Ambient Air Quality Standards 

*******

Section .0409 ........................... Particulate Matter ................... 1/1/2010 6/30/2014 [Insert Federal 

Register citation].

Section .0410 ........................... PM2.5 Particulate Matter ......... 1/1/2010 6/30/2014 [Insert Federal 

Register citation].

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–15151 Filed 6–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 79, 80, 85, 86, 600, 1036, 

1037, 1039, 1042, 1048, 1054, 1065, and 

1066 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0135; FRL 9906–86– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AQ86 

Control of Air Pollution From Motor 

Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle 

Emission and Fuel Standards 

Correction 

In rule document 2014–06954, 

appearing on pages 23414–23886, in the 

issue of Monday, April 28, 2014, make 

the following corrections: 

§ 86.113–94 Fuel specifications. 

[Corrected] 

■ On page 23695 make the following 

correction: 

The first table on page 23695 is 

corrected as set forth below. 

Property Unit Type 2–D Reference 

procedure 1

(i) Cetane Number ............................................................................................ ...................................... 40–50 ........................... ASTM D613 

(ii) Cetane Index ............................................................................................... ...................................... 40–50 ........................... ASTM D976 

(iii) Distillation range: 

(A) IBP ....................................................................................................... 340–400 (171.1–204.4).

(B) 10 pct. point ......................................................................................... 400–460 (204.4–237.8).

(C) 50 pct. point ......................................................................................... °F (°C) .......................... 470–540 (243.3–282.2) STM D86 

(D) 90 pct. point ......................................................................................... 560–630 (293.3–332.2).

(E) EP ........................................................................................................ 610–690 (321.1–365.6) 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES