alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5575 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5575

   To provide a mechanism for the determination on the merits of the 
   claims of claimants who met the class criteria in a civil action 
relating to racial discrimination by the Department of Agriculture but 
                  who were denied that determination.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2006

Mr. Chabot (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. 
    Bachus, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Watt, and Mr. Thompson of 
 Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide a mechanism for the determination on the merits of the 
   claims of claimants who met the class criteria in a civil action 
relating to racial discrimination by the Department of Agriculture but 
                  who were denied that determination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pigford Claims Remedy Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION ON MERITS OF PIGFORD CLAIMS.

    (a) In General.--Any Pigford claimant who has not previously 
obtained a determination on the merits of a Pigford claim may, in a 
civil action, obtain that determination.
    (b) Intent of Congress as to Remedial Nature of Section.--It is the 
intent of Congress that this section be liberally construed so as to 
effectuate its remedial purpose of giving a full determination on the 
merits for each Pigford claim denied that determination.
    (c) Definitions.--In this Act--
            (1) the term ``Pigford claimant'' means an individual who 
        previously submitted a late-filing request under section 5(g) 
        of the consent decree in the case of Pigford v. Glickman, 
        approved by the United States District Court for the District 
        of Columbia on April 14, 1999; and
            (2) the term ``Pigford claim'' means a discrimination 
        complaint, as defined by section 1(h) of that consent decree 
        and documented under section 5(b) of that consent decree.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-09-009] 

      ( print page 11751)    

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

 March 26, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

# Place:

 Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

 Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1145 (Final) (Certain Steel Threaded Rod From China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before April 6, 2009.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 17, 2009. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

 [FR Doc. E9-6089 Filed 3-17-09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT D

		 FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

		   MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A.


	      MBNA MASTER CREDIT CARD TRUST II


	 The undersigned, a duly authorized representative
of MBNA America Bank, N.A. (the "Bank"), as Servicer
pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
August 4, 1994 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") by
and between the Bank and The Bank of New York, as trustee,
(the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:

	 1.  The Bank is Servicer under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement.

	 2.  The undersigned is duly authorized as required
pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to execute
and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

	 3.  This Certificate is delivered pursuant to
Section 3.05 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

	 4.  A review of the activities of the Servicer
during the twelve month period ended June 30, 1997 was
conducted under my supervision.

	 5.  Based on such review, the Servicer has, to my
knowledge, fully performed all its obligations under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such twelve month
period and no material default in the performance of such
obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
forth in paragraph 6 below.

	 6.  The following is a description of each material
default in the performance of the Servicer's obligations
under the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
known to me to have been made during the twelve month period
ended June 30, 1997,  which sets forth in detail (i) the
nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the
Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the
current status of each such default:

			   "None"


	 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly
executed this Certificate this 6th day of August, 1997.



			     By: /s/ Marguerite M. Boylan
			      Name:    Marguerite M. Boylan
			      Title:      Vice President
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*Alva Jones *et al.*

(No. 6400)

Submitted November 19, 1929.

Decided November 26, 1929.

*265
      *Harper & B.aher*and *Grover E. Hedges,*for plaintiff in error.

*Howard B. Lee,*Attorney General, and *W. Elliott Nefflen,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Litz,. Judge:

Tlie defendant, Alva Jones, was tried, convicted and sentenced to two years and six months in the penitentiary for grand larceny, under an indictment charging him and Howard Hively jointly with the larceny of $30.00 belonging to Susan Walker.

Jones and Hively had been formerly tried and convicted jointly. The judgment sentencing them under that conviction to a term in the penitentiary was reversed, on a former writ of error, because of improper remarks of the trial judge, misconduct of the prosecuting attorney, and the admission of improper evidence on behalf of the state. *State*v. *Howard Hively et al.,*103 W. Va. 237. After the ease was remanded, the defendants severed and a separate trial of Jones, resulting in the judgment complained of, followed. Hively was also re-tried and convicted, and is back in this Court on a second *266writ of error. The evidence tending to prove the guilt of Jones and Hively is fully recited in the opinion of the Hively case to be announced contemporaneously herewith, except that the evidence in this case tends to implicate Hively as principal in the first degree and Jones as principal in the second degree. Jones did not testify.

Eemarks of the prosecuting attorney, as a witness for the state, reflecting upon the character of Jones; the admission of statements made by Jones before the grand jury as tending to implicate him in the commission of the crime;-and argument of counsel for the state that the evidence of the prosecution had not been denied by Jones himself, constitute the chief assignments of error.

Although a general objection to the evidence of William S. Eyan is relied on in the motion for a new trial, the rulings of the trial court on objections to particular parts thereof is neither assigned as error in the motion nor made the subject of special bills of exceptions. The evidence of statements of the defendant as a witness before the grand jury was erroneous. “In a criminal prosecution other than for perjury, evidence shall not be given against the accused of any statement made by him as a witness upon a legal examination.” Section 20, Chapter 152, Code. “A legal examination as contemplated by section 20, Chapter 152, Code, apparently has reference to any investigation conducted according to and under the authority of law.” *State*v. *Stroud,*107 W. Va. 591.

The statements of counsel complained of violate the letter of section 19, Chapter 152, Code, prohibiting comment upon the failure of the defendant to testify, and the spirit of section 5, Article III of the State Constitution, providing that no person in a criminal ease shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

The judgment is reversed, verdict set aside, and a new trial awarded the defendant.

*Reversed; verdict set aside; new trial awarded.*
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Bay View Capital Corporation listed below of our report dated January 26, 1996,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bay View Capital Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 1995:


Registration Statement No. 33-30602 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-30603 on Form S-8
Post-effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-35483 
  on Form S-3
Post-effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 33-32416 
  on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 33-36161 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-41924 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-95724 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-95726 on Form S-8


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
March 22, 1996
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Serbin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                    /s/ ANTHONY BONELLI
                                    -----------------------
                                    Anthony Bonelli
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    November 21, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7243

LIONELL ELIJAH WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NEWSWEEK, INCORPORATED; NATHAN MCCALL, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1130) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lionell Elijah Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Taylor Baine, Sherry A. Ingram, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is signed and date stamped on August 27, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on August 31, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Lionell Elijah Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil diversity action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and denying his motion for default judgment against Defendant Nathan McCall. Williams filed this action against Newsweek, Inc., and McCall alleging that they used his picture in a Newsweek article without Williams’ consent and inviolation of Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-40 (Michie 1992). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Newsweek, Inc. , No. CA-98-1130 (Aug. 31, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                            12/31/98          12/31/97
<S>                                                         <C>               <C> 
Earnings: 
         Earnings before income tax expenses               $ 43,934          $ 23,266
         Add:
         Interest on advances and other borrowings          102,350            78,424
         Interest component of rental expense                 2,111               969
                                                           --------          --------
         Earnings before fixed charges excluding
          interest on customer deposits                     148,395           102,659
         Interest on customer deposits                      149,656            76,483
                                                           --------          --------
         Earnings before fixed charges                     $298,051          $179,142
                                                           ========          ========

Fixed charges:
         Interest on advances and other borrowings         $102,350          $ 78,424
         Interest component of rental expense                 2,111               969
                                                           --------          --------
         Fixed charges excluding interest on 
          customer deposits                                 104,461            79,393
         Interest on customer deposits                      149,656            76,483
                                                           --------          --------
         Total fixed charges                               $254,117          $155,876
                                                           ========          ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges including interest
 on customer deposits                                          1.17              1.15

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges excluding interest
 on customer deposits                                          1.42              1.29

</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,666-01

EX P ARTE JOHN PA LMER

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1985CR2282-W1 IN THE 144TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant filed this a

pplication for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler

k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. According to the summary sheet prepa red by the district cler

k and the docket sheet, the trial cou rt held an evidentiar y hear ing, but the transcr ipt of the hear ing was not forwa rded to this Court. Under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, a repor ter is require d to transcr ibe a hear ing within fiftee n day s of its c onclusion and then to immediately forwa rd the transcr ipt to the district c lerk in the county of conviction. Id

. at § 3(d). A fter r ece iving the tr anscr ipt, the district clerk is re quired to forwa rd it, among other thing s, to this C ourt. Id .; see also T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). The dist rict clerk s hall serve the reporter in Applicant’s case w i t h a copy of t his order and2

then either forwa

rd to this Court the transcr ipt of the evidentiar y hear ing or cer

tify in writing that the repor ter ha s not transcribe d the hea ring

. I f th e co m p l ai nant signe d a rec antation aff idavit that was filed and is part of the habea s

rec ord, the district cler

k shall also forwa

rd the aff idavit to this Court. Under Article 11.07, a district cler k is require d to forwa

rd to this Court, among other things, “ the application, any answe rs fil ed, any motions filed, transcripts of all depositions a nd hear ings, any aff

idavits, a nd any other matters such as officia l r ecor ds used by the court in r esolving issues of fa ct.” T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d); see also T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). The district cler

k shall comply with this order within thirty day s from the date of this order

. Filed: Nove mber 26, 2019 Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,588
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,510
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,798,239)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29,835)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (29,835)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29,835)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,442]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 2, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a One Stop Operator in the state of Colorado on behalf of workers at Freudenberg NOK, Vibration Control Technologies, Plymouth, Michigan.

As a One Stop Operator in the State of Colorado, the petitioner is not authorized to file a petition on behalf of a worker group outside of Colorado. Thus the petition has been deemed invalid and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-5922 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Annual Report of First Cash Financial Services,  Inc.
 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as  filed
 with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
 "Report"), we, J. Alan Barron and  R. Douglas Orr each certify, pursuant  to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-
 Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of the Company.


 Date:  March 13, 2006

 /s/ J. Alan Barron
 ------------------
 J. Alan Barron
 Chief Executive Officer

 /s/ R. Douglas Orr
 ------------------
 R. Douglas Orr
 Chief Financial Officer