alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of EastKansas Agri-Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Jill Zimmerman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   /s/  Jill Zimmerman        |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Treasurer  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Dated:  May 16, 2005              |

 

----
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4570



#  R OBERT D. Z INNAMON , a/k/a Robert Gerald, Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge.

(CR-91-387) Submitted: February 15, 2002 Decided: March 1, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Mary Lou Newberger, Acting Federal Public Defender, Edward H.Weis, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Miller A. Bushong, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Robert D. Zinnamon appeals his sentence, upon revocation of hissupervised release, to seven months incarceration followed by twentynine months supervised release. Zinnamon’s attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating there are no meritorious issues for appeal. On Zinnamon’s behalf, counsel contends 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (1988 & Supp. V) (current version at 18 U.S.C. § 3538(e)(3) (1994)), required the district court to give Zinnamon credit for time served on supervised release when it sentenced him to a second term of supervised release. Althoughadvised of his right to do so, Zinnamon has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. We have reviewed the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of Anders and find no error in Zinnamon’s sentence and no meritorious issues for appeal. See 18 U.S.C § 3583(e)(3) (1988 & Supp. V); Johnson v. United States , 529 U.S. 694, 703-13 (2000). We therefore affirm Zinnamon’s sentence. We require that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Zinnamon requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Zinnamon. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. Z INNAMON
George FEDE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106452

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: December 18, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

George Fede appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.38


 


INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.


 


2007 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

EQUITY DEFERRAL AWARD PROGRAM SUBPLAN


 


GRANT NOTICE


 


Investment
Technology Group, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to Section 6
of its Equity Deferral Award Program Subplan (the “Program”), hereby
grants to you as a Participant under the Program, Stock Units representing a
generally nontransferable right to receive one share of Company Stock with
respect to each underlying Stock Unit at a specified future date together with
a right to Dividend Equivalents on Basic Units as specified in the Program (the
“Grant”), subject to all of the terms and conditions as set forth
herein, the Program and the Investment Technology Group, Inc. 2007 Omnibus
Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).(1) All capitalized terms herein
that are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms
in the Program or Plan, as applicable.


 


Participant:


Date of Grant:


Number of Basic Stock Units subject to
Grant:


Number of Matching Stock Units subject to
Grant:


 


Vesting Schedule: The Basic Units subject to this Grant shall
vest in equal annual installments on each of the first, second and third
anniversaries of the Date of Grant if the Participant remains continuously
employed by the Company on each applicable vesting date. The Matching Units
granted with respect to the Basic Units subject to this Grant shall vest 100%
on the third anniversary of the Date of Grant if the Participant remains
continuously employed by the Company through such date.  The Participant shall receive shares of
Company Stock in settlement of the Basic Units and Matching Units in accordance
with the terms of the Program, subject to the collection of applicable taxes in
connection with the issuance of Company Stock.


 


Acknowledgements: You
acknowledge receipt of this Grant Notice, the Program, the Plan and the Plan
prospectus.(1)  You further acknowledge that this Grant is made under, and
governed by the terms and conditions of, the Plan and the Program and you agree
to be bound by such terms.  The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”),
or any other committee appointed by the Board to administer the Program, has
the authority to interpret and construe this Grant pursuant to the terms of the
Program and the Plan, and its decisions shall be conclusive as to any questions
arising hereunder.


 


	
  INVESTMENT
  TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

  	
   

  	
  PARTICIPANT

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
				



 


	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


	
  Date:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
   

  



 






(1) The Plan, Plan prospectus, and Program are
available on the Company’s Intraweb; provided that paper copies of the Plan,
Plan prospectus and Program are available upon request by contacting the Legal
Department of the Company at ITG_Legal.
November 18, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ASIF AEJAZ, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00088-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to dismiss the appeal. 

Having considered the motion, the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately. We further order this 

decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMER
31, 1996, UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND
SUBSIDIARY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       7,619,307
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         396,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,899,729
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     97,465,453
<ALLOWANCE>                                    727,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,523,686
<DEPOSITS>                                 106,602,789
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,700,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,369,485
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,745,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             119,523,686
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,136,925
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              629,853
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               244,369
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,011,147
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,859,157
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,860,834
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,150,313
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  416,900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,437,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                133,578
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   105,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    0.09
<LOANS-NON>                                    434,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    49,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,890,058
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               783,466
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  686,497
<RECOVERIES>                                   213,798
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              727,667
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           727,667
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[No. 51708-2-I.

Division One.

May 10, 2004.]

#### Nadia Hinkson-Irizarry, *Individually and as Personal Representative,*et al., *Appellants,*v. Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-2-17075-9, Gregory R Canova, J., entered September 13, 2002. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Becker and Appelwick, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**URANIUMRESOURCES, INC.**

650 S. Edmonds Lane, Suite 108,Lewisville, TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone972.219.3311 Fax

www.uraniumresources.com

 

March 13, 2008

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 5 th  Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

 

I, David N. Clark, Chief Executive Officer of UraniumResources, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2006, which this certificationaccompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|  /s/ DAVID N. CLARK |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David N. Clark           |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |
| March 13, 2008           |   |

 

----
Order filed May 23, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00214

- CV

____________ JACK PIDGEON AND LAR RY HICKS , Appellant s
V. SYLVESTOR TURNER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACI TY AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HOUSTON, AND THE CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 61812



### ORDER
No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The court reporter for the
310th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On April 26, 2019 , the clerk of this court notified appellant s that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter ’ s record unless appellant s , within 15 days of notice, provided this courtwith proof of payment for the record. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37.3(c). Appellant s filed

no reply.
Accordingly, we order appellant s to file a brief in this appeal within thirty days of the date of this order. If appellant s fail to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 November 9, 2007
    /s/ WILLIAM A. SEARSWilliam A. SearsChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Noble Corporation
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-1253

___________ Louis Anthony Mealer, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Service Vending Co., Inc., a Missouri * Appeal from the United States corporation; Jerry Sumners, Sr., * District Court for the Western individually and as an agent of * District of Missouri. Service Vending Co., Inc.; * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants-Appellees, * * Credit Bureau Services of Missouri, * Inc., a Missouri corporation, * * Defendant. *

___________ Submitted: November 15, 2001 Filed: January 4, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Louis Anthony Mealer brought claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and common law claims of invasion of privacy against Service Vending Co. and Jerry* The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. -2- Sumners, Sr. A jury found in Mealer’s favor on the claims against Sumners, but not against Service Vending. Mealer then sought about $66,000 in attorney’s fees. Because Mealer did not break out the rate of compensation for the attorneys or support staff, the district court * sorted through the list of all legal services provided and determined the different rates requested. Mealer also lumped all hours expended together, so the district court separated out the hours for each person involved in the litigation. Next, the district court reviewed Sumner’s objections that certain hours billed were unreasonable, and specifically addressed the granted objections. The court also disallowed certain costs. The court then subtracted the unreasonable hours and calculated the lodestar amount as $45,851.87 for fees and costs. After reviewing the factors that could require the amount to be adjusted upward or downward stated in Winter v. Cerro Gordo County Conservation Bd. , 925 F.2d 1069, 1074 n.8 (8th Cir. 1991), the district court found the award was excessive given the lack of difficulty or novelty, the limited success, and the amount of awards in similar cases. The court reduced the fee award, finding a total award of $26,538.87 would fully compensate Mealer’s attorneys. The court later denied Mealer’s motion to amend or alter the award. On appeal, Mealer contends the district court abused its discretion in reducing both the hourly rate and the number of hours in calculating attorney’s fees. He also argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in arriving at the fee award or in denying Mealer’s motion. Because we have nothing to add to the district court’s explanations, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s orders. See 8 th Cir. R. 47B. JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the result and the judgment.-3- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
exv10wjw2







Exhibit 10.J.2




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE

EL PASO CORPORATION

DIRECTOR CHARITABLE AWARD PLAN




     Pursuant to authorization by the El Paso Corporation Board of Directors (the “Board”)
and Section 6 of the El Paso Corporation Director Charitable Award Plan, Amended and Restated
effective as of August 1, 1998, as amended (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows,
effective December 4, 2003:



     WHEREAS, the Board, based upon a recommendation from its Compensation Committee, has
determined it is in the best interests of the Company to terminate the Plan.



     NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby terminated, effective December 4, 2003. The
termination of the Plan does not affect the designation of Charitable Awards under the Plan by a
Participant who has met the two-year service requirement on the Board and has been notified of his
or her eligibility to participate in the Plan prior to the effective date of this amendment.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly executed on this
4th day of December, 2003.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EL PASO CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Susan B. Ortenstone
 	 
	 	 	Susan B. Ortenstone 	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President,

Human Resources 	 
	 


Attest:




	 	 	 
	/s/ David L. Siddall
	 	 
	 

Corporate Secretary
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Jean-Claude Kunz



 Exhibit 10.24 

 

 

 PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 
 Jean-Claude Kunz 
 Lausanne, April 1, 2009 
 Dear Jean-Claude, 
 Further to your annual performance assessment and discussion with your supervisor, we are pleased to confirm that effective as of April 1, 2009, your
annual base salary is being increased by 4%. 
  

					
	from	 	CHF 1,014,000.00 p.a.*    	  	/        CHF 78,000.00 p.m.*
	to	 	CHF 1,054,560.00 p.a.	  	/        CHF 81,120.00 p.m.

 Your new Position in Range as a result of this salary increase is now 34%. 
 All other conditions
relating to your employment with Philip Morris International Management S.A. remain as stated in your letter of employment issued at the time of the engagement and, if applicable, in any subsequent amendments. 
 We take this opportunity of wishing you continued success and satisfaction. 
  

	
	Yours sincerely,
	
	 Peter-Paul Adriaansen
 Director Human Resources Decision Support &
 Business Partner Switzerland


	
	




	


  

	*	p.a. = annual 


	*	p.m. = monthly
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5535 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5535

To amend title 18, United States Code, to exclude foreign governmental 
entities from suing under the treble damages portion of its civil RICO 
                              provisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2006

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to exclude foreign governmental 
entities from suing under the treble damages portion of its civil RICO 
                              provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prevention of Civil RICO Abuse Act 
of 2006''.

SEC. 2. RICO AMENDMENT.

    Section 1964(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``A foreign governmental entity may 
not sue under this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Wilson Cheng, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
      of
      Directors and Treasurer of BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC. (the "Company"), DOES
      HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.
      The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31,
      2006
      (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
      this **** 16th
      day
      of October, 2006.





**/s/
              Wilson
              Cheng**Wilson
              ChengChief
              Executive Officer and Chief Financial
              Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC. and will be retained by BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.