# G LY PHOSA

TE 

# F OCUS 

# M EETING N OVEMBER 

### 8, 2012 J OINT 

### G LY PHOSA

TE 

### T ASK 

### F ORCE

# G LY PHOSA

TE 

# U SE 

# P RO FILE

11/08/2012 2 360 18 42 **Glyphosat e Mark** **et**

**Es timate f** **or 2013**

Agricultural (heavily Soybean, Corn, Cotton) Home and Garden Industry, Commercial, Governmental ( Millions of Pounds A.I.)

# A V AL UA BLE 

# W EED 

# C ONTR OL 

# TOOL • Char act eris tics of glyphosate make it versatile and fle xible

– Br oad spectrum contr ol of gr ass and br oadleaf weeds

– Po st - emerge nce activity enables application an y time we eds ar e pr esen t and activ ely gr owing

– Absence of soil r esidual activity pr ovides man y options for cr opping syste ms • Fa cilit ate s incr eased adoption of conser vat ion tillag e pr actices • Selectiv e application equipment (wiper , hooded / shielded spr ay er , injection) incr eases on - ta rget application • Div ersity of r egis te re d uses r eflects these charact eris tics 11/08/2012 3

# U SE 

# M AT RIX 

# – S ELE CTION 

# C RITERIA • Primary originality • Timefr ame when r egis te re d as a me - too • Whether r egis tran t has r eorga niz ed / amended label • Whether r egis tran t has author ed dif fe re ntt ex t • Specificity of dir ections • Inclusiv eness of application r ate s and equipmen t types • Br eadth of uses r egis te re d

– Ex ample: Some r esidential re gistrat ions ha ve r elatively narrow use patterns

– about 50 scr eened and found to be represented by much smaller set of selected labels • Eliminated pr oducts with identical/nearly iden tical label languag e • Va rious formulations and glyphosate salts ( normaliz ed by glyphosate acid equiv alen t ) 11/08/2012 4

# U SE 

# M AT RIX 

# - S ELE CTED 

# A G 

# LABELS

9 labels (5 r egis tran ts, 4 salts)

11/08/2012 5 **EP A R**  **eg. No. Name**  **Re gistr** **ant Glyphosat**  **e Fo**  **rm** 100 - 1182 To uchdown HiT ech Sy ngent a Po ta ssium salt 524 - 475 Ro undup Ultra Monsanto Isopr opylamine salt 524 - 549 Ro undup Po werMax Monsanto Po ta ssium salt 4787 - 23 Glyfos X -Tra Cheminova Isopr opylamine salt 4787 - 31 Glyfos Cheminova Isopr opylamine salt 62719 - 323 Glyphomax Dow Agr oSciences Isopr opylamine salt 62719 - 556 Durango DMA Dow Agr oSciences Dimeth ylamine salt 71368 - 20 Cr edit Nufarm Isopr opylamine salt 71368 - 25 Cr edit Duo Nufarm Ammonium salt and Isopr opylamine salt

# U SE 

# M AT RIX 

# – S ELE CTED 

# N ON 

# C RO P (T ERRE STRIAL )



### 4 labels (4 r egistran ts, 3 salts)

11/08/2012 6 **EP A R**  **eg. No. Name**  **Re gistr** **ant Glyphosat**  **e Fo**  **rm** 228 - 366 Raz or Pro Nufarm Isopr opylamine salt 524 - 579 Ro undup ProMax Monsanto Po ta ssium salt 62719 - 556 Accord XRT II Dow Agr oSciences Dimeth ylamine salt 67760 - 57 Glyfos Pro Cheminova Isopr opylamine salt

# U SE 

# M AT RIX 

# – S ELE CTED 

# N ON 

# C RO P (A QU AT IC )



### 4 labels select ed (4 r egistran ts)

11/08/2012 7 **EP A R**  **eg. No. Name**  **Re gistr** **ant Glyphosat**  **e Fo**  **rm** 228 - 366 Raz or Pro Nufarm Isopr opylamine salt 524 - 343 AquaMast er Monsanto Isopr opylamine salt 62719 - 324 Glypr o Dow Agr oSciences Isopr opylamine salt 4787 - 34 Glyfos Aquatic Cheminova Isopr opylamine salt

## U SE 

## M AT RIX 

## – S ELE CTED 

## R ESIDENTIAL

## /C ONSUMER

7 labels select ed from ~ 50 pr oducts scr eened

(4 r egistran ts)

11/08/2012 8 **EP A R**  **eg. No. Name**  **Re gistr** **ant Glyphosat**  **e Fo**  **rm** 2217 - 844 EH - 1391 PBI/Gor don Isopr opylamine salt 9688 - 168 RTU Herbicide GII Chemsico Isopr opylamine salt 67760 - 46 Glyfos Concentrate 18% Cheminova Isopr opylamine salt 67760 - 47 Glyfos Concentrate 1.92% Cheminova Isopr opylamine salt 71995 - 17 Ro undup Rainfast

Concentrate Monsanto Isopr opylamine salt 71995 - 19 Kleeraway Concentrate Monsanto Isopr opylamine salt 71995 - 32 Ro undup We ed & Grass

Killer RTU Monsanto Isopr opylamine salt

# U SE 

# M AT RIX 

# - S TAT US • Ov er 40 spr eadsheets cat egoriz ed by cr op, sets of cr ops, non - cr op t err es trial, aquatic and r esiden tial/ consumer use patte rns • Appr ox imat ely 85% complet e

– Agricultur al essen tially done

– Non - cr op, aquatic and r esiden tial in pr ogr ess 

### • Ta rgetdeadline? E arly 2013 • Ma trix summary e xe mplifies range of r egis te re d pr oducts and labels • Ma trix summary rates normaliz ed to glyphosat e a.e . 11/08/2012 9

# U SE 

# M AT RIX 

# – D ATA 

# G AP 

# F ILLING • Application Rat es

– Ma ximum single r ate at v arious timings

– Option to split single r ate into lower sequen tial rate s

– Ma ximum number of applications per cr op cy cle

– Ma ximum application r ate per y ear

– Ma ximum annual r ate for all applications combined 

### • In te rv als

– Re tr eatment (RTI)

– Pr ehar ve st (PHI)

– Pr egr azing (PGI)

– Plan tback (PBI) 11/08/2012 10

## E **XAMPLE** 

## U **SE** 

## M **AT RIX**  CONVENTIONAL CORN Group R eview

11/08/2012 11

# U SE 

# A ND 

# U SAGE 

# D ATA • Label information addr essed by label use matrix • Median and 90 th 

### per cen tile rate s?

– How much r ate data is needed?

– Migh t ther e be an EEC re lated to a specific r ate that is pr otectiv e in comparison to r elev an t ec otox endpoin ts?

– Lower rate data ther efor e less needed? 

### • Market r esear ch or other use dat a collection?

– Prioritiz ation of uses (effort v ersus v alue)?

– What ar e accept able data sour ces for minor / specialty uses?

– Gr oups of cr ops for bigg er bucketing? 11/08/2012 12

# P ER CENT 

# C RO P 

# T RE AT ED 

# D ATA • Use distribution (acr eag e, geographic al dis tribution and geographic al limit ations)

– How to addr ess br oad r ang e of uses with glyphosate? 

### • Market r esear ch or other usage dat a co llection? • Sub - co unty information and EP A’ s e xpect ation of “c omplet eness”? • Groups of crops? • Challenges within JGTF

– Not all member s subscribe to market re sear ch data ser vices

– Re gulatory utility of information unclear v ersus cost 11/08/2012 13

# Q UE STIONS

# /D ISCUSSION WITH 

# EP A • Timelines for r emainder of R egis tration R eview

– EFED work plan/E - Fa te assessmen ts?

– Deadline fo r use matrices? (inputs fo r assessmen ts) 

## • Ques tions/Outs ta nding It ems

– Scope and timing of futur e Fo cus meetings

– Cat ch up DCIs needed fo r new r egistran t

– Means to compel label changes? 11/08/2012 14