alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register: March 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 41)]
[Notices]               
[Page 9598]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03mr10-48]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 139]

 
Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

Correction

    In notice document 2010-3646 appearing on page 8352 in the issue of 
February 24, 2010, make the following correction:
    In the third column, the paragraph that begins with ``DATES:'' 
should read: ``DATES: Comments should be received on or before April 
26, 2010 to be assured of consideration.''

[FR Doc. C1-2010-3646 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
-79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 21.1   Subsidiaries of the Registrant   1. The Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Chance High International Limited, a British Virgin Islands company (Chance High);  2. Chance Highs wholly owned subsidiary, YantaiNirui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a PRC company (WOFE);  3. the WOFEs variable interest entity, YantaiBohai Pharmaceuticals Group Co., Ltd., a PRC company (Bohai), which is the Companys  initial operating subsidiary; and  4. WOFEs wholly owned subsidiary, YantaiTianzheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a PRC company (YantaiTianzheng), which the Company acquired in August 2011 and is the Companys second operating subsidiary.   1
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-747-000]


Robbins Energy LLC; Notice of Filing

March 3, 2009.
    Take notice that on February 24, 2009, Robbins Energy LLC filed, 
pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(d), and 
Part 35 of the Commission's regulations, an application for 
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at 
negotiated, market-based rates, Rate Schedule FERC No. 1.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a0c0f180905242623242f193f3a3a25383e0a2c2f3829642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ddbd8cfded2f3f1f4f3f8cee8ededf2efe9ddfbf8effeb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 17, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5227 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23b





Independent Auditors Consent





The Board of Directors


Bay View Capital Corporation and subsidiaries:





We consent to the inclusion in the registration statements (Nos. 33-30602, 33-30603, 33-36161, 33-41924, 33-95724, 33-95726, 333-37027, 333-37029, 333-37031, 333-92637, 333-70362 and 333-70372) on Form S-8 and in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-29757 and 333-64877) on Form S-3 of Bay View Capital Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated February 14, 2001, with respect to the consolidated statement of financial condition of Bay View Capital
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31,
2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of Bay View Capital Corporation and subsidiaries.





/s/ KPMG LLP





San Francisco, California


March 25, 2002




1
----

----

| 1. | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Quarterly      Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |   |                                                                        |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      August 18, 2008 |   |                                                                        |
|                       | By:    | /s/ David      Naylor          |
|                       |   | David      Naylor                                                           |
|                       |   | Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer                             |

----
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with thequarterly report of Primus Guaranty, Ltd., a Bermuda company (the"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Thomas W. Jasper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,Richard Claiden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                                      |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | to my knowledge, the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date: August 12, 2005

|  | /s/ ThomasW. Jasper Thomas W. Jasper Chief Executive Officer |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/ Richard Claiden RichardClaiden Chief Financial Officer |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------|

----
No. 09-440.

#### William H. Schramm, Petitioner v. Raymond L. LaHood, Secretary of Transportation.

559 U.S. 1067, 130 S. Ct. 2090,

176 L. Ed. 2d 721,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3342.

April 19, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 318 Fed. Appx. 337.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (AS CODIFIED AT 18
U.S.C. SS. 1350).

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 Title 18, United State Code), the undersigned
officer of Cortelco Systems Puerto Rico, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2003 (the
"Form 10-q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15(d) of the Security Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 14, 2003                    By /s/ Francisco Sanchez
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Vice President
                                           Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
Incorporation by Reference

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927

April 1, 2013

The contents of the following dockets are hereby incorporated by reference into and are

considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR2009-0927 (Additional Sources of Fluorinated Gases):

1) EPA–HQ– OAR–2011–0028 (Proposed Confidentiality Determinations for 9 Subparts

and Proposed Amendments and Confidentiality Determinations for Subpart I)

2) EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0147 (Technical Corrections, Clarifying and Other Amendments

to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, and Proposed Confidentiality Determinations for 

Certain Data Elements of the Fluorinated Gas Source Category)

3) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0512 (Technical Revisions for Subparts I and W of the Greenhouse 

Gas Reporting Rule and Electronics Manufacturing: Revisions to Heat Transfer Fluid 

Provisions)

4) EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0934 (2013 Technical Corrections, Clarifying, and Other 

Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule)

Accessing dockets:

Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West

Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. This Docket

Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.

The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone

number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.15 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 AMEREN CORPORATION DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN 
 FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 
 WHEREAS, Ameren Corporation (“Ameren”) amended and restated the Ameren Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Members of the
Board of Directors (“Plan”) effective January 1, 2009; 
 WHEREAS, Ameren reserved the right to amend the Plan;
and 
 WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2010, Ameren desires to amend the Plan to change the interest crediting rates for
deferrals attributable to a Participant’s Director’s Retainer Fee and/or Meeting Stipend made with respect to Plan Years commencing on and after January 1, 2010; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective January 1, 2010, Section 7.A.1. of the Plan is amended by restating the second and third paragraphs
thereunder as follows: 
 For this purpose, Earnings rates are calculated annually as of the first day of the Plan Year. The
“Plan Interest Rate” for any Plan Year commencing before January 1, 2010 shall be 150 percent of the average Mergent’s Seasoned AAA Corporate Bond Yield Index (“Mergent’s Index” formerly called
“Moody’s Index”) for the previous calendar year. The “Plan Interest Rate” for any Plan Year commencing on and after January 1, 2010 shall be 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate, with annual
compounding (as prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code) (“AFR”) for the December immediately preceding such Plan Year. 
 The “Base Interest Rate” for any Plan Year commencing before January 1, 2010 shall be equal to the average Mergent’s Index for the previous calendar year. The “Base Interest
Rate” for any Plan Year commencing on and after January 1, 2010 shall be equal to 120 percent of the AFR for the December immediately preceding such Plan Year. 
 Except as amended by this Amendment, all of the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing Amendment is adopted on the 12th day of
October, 2009. 
  

			
	 AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY
 On behalf of AMEREN CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark C. Lindgren

		
	Name:	 	 Mark C. Lindgren

		
	Title:	 	 Vice President, Corporate HR
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5104

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1750 16th Street South in St. Petersburg, 

Florida, as the ‘‘Morris W. Milton Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 5104 EH 

1 SECTION 1. MORRIS W. MILTON POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1750 16th Street South in St. 

4 Petersburg, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Morris W. Milton Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Morris W. Milton Post 

10 Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 19, 2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5104

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postton Post Office’’. St. Petersburg, Florida, as the ‘‘Morris W. Mil- al Service located at 1750 16th Street South in
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134638 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134638 

 COA: 267566 

Muskegon CC: 05-051640-FC 

JALVELYN MICHAEL LEE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,825]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 7, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Briggs-Shaffner Company, Simpsonville, South Carolina.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-5901 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Maurice R. HOGAN, Appellant.

WD 80593

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: August 28, 2018

Nancy McKerrow, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Nathan Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, P.J., Cynthia L. Martin, and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

*918Mr. Maurice R. Hogan appeals his convictions by a Cole County jury for first-degree child molestation, § 566.067, and sexual misconduct involving a child by indecent exposure, § 566.083. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent terms of twenty-five years' imprisonment for child molestation and five years for sexual misconduct. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James W. Bernau, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual
period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such 10-K fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Willamette Valley
Vineyards Inc.

Date: March 31, 2006
By:  /s/ James w. Bernau
Name: James W. Bernau
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. James Edward RAYNOR, Jr.

No. COA18-942

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

NO ERROR.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 / h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 

### 0 $ 85.00 

### 8 51 $ 72,335.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in complian ce: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 72,335 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 

A ction (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain wa rranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:**

Will the AD have a s ignificant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :