alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5650 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 

tax incentives for ethanol and biodiesel used as a fuel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2006 

Mr. HULSHOF (for himself, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. NUSSLE, Mr. PETERSON of 

Minnesota, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. TERRY, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. OSBORNE, Mr. 

EMANUEL, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, 

and Ms. HERSETH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent certain tax incentives for ethanol and biodiesel used as a fuel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Renewable Fuels and 

5 Energy Independence Promotion Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CREDITS FOR ALCOHOL AND BIODIESEL USED AS A 

7 FUEL MADE PERMANENT. 

8 (a) INCOME TAX.— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5650 IH

1 (1) ALCOHOL.—Section 40 of the Internal Rev2 enue Code of 1986 (relating to alcohol used as a 

3 fuel) is amended by striking subsection (e). 

4 (2) BIODIESEL.—Section 40A of such Code (re5 lating to biodiesel and renewable diesel used as fuel) 

6 is amended by striking subsection (g). 

7 (b) EXCISE TAX.— 

8 (1) ALCOHOL MIXTURE USED AS A FUEL.— 

9 Subsection (b) of section 6426 of such Code (relat10 ing to alcohol fuel mixture credit) is amended by 

11 striking paragraph (5). 

12 (2) BIODIESEL MIXTURE USED AS A FUEL.— 

13 Subsection (c) of section 6426 of such Code (relat14 ing to biodiesel mixture credit) is amended by strik15 ing paragraph (6). 

16 (3) ALCOHOL AND BIODIESEL MIXTURES NOT

17 USED FOR TAXABLE PURPOSES.—Paragraph (5) of 

18 section 6427(e) of such Code, as amended by the 

19 Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation 

20 Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, is amended— 

21 (A) by striking subparagraphs (A) and 

22 (B), 

23 (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) 

24 and (D) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respec25 tively, and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5650 IH

1 (C) in subparagraph (A), as so redesig2 nated, by striking ‘‘subparagraph (D)’’ and in3 serting ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
---

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Supatcha Resources Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Axent,
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                   
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of Supatcha Resources Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

SUPATCHA RESOURCES, INC.

|By:   | /s/ Donald Axent                          | 
|----- | ----------------------------------------- | 
|      | Donald Axent                              | 
|      | President, Chief Executive
      Officer, | 
|      | Director                                  | 
|      |                                           | 
|      |                                           | 
|Date: | June 10, 2009                             | 

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MARK ROGER SULT,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 987 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 3rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard P. Kundrat, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of NuVim,  Inc. for the
period ended September 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The small business  issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business  issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and
the audit  committee of small  business  issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 30, 2006

/s/ Richard P. Kundrat
-----------------------
Richard P. Kundrat
Chief Financial Officer
Maurice WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105827

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: December 18, 2018

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Williams ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that *855the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction relief motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, J. Russell Porter,
Chief Executive Officer of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), filed by the Company
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ J. RUSSELL PORTERJ. Russell PorterChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT    32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)   The    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| August 15, 2005 | /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz |
|-----------------|-------------------------|
|            |                         |
|            | Robert K. Moskovitz     |
|            | Chief Financial Officer |

----
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5518 

To repeal the Medicare cost containment provisions contained in subtitle 

A of title VIII of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 

Modernization Act of 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. WEXLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Medicare cost containment provisions contained 

in subtitle A of title VIII of the Medicare Prescription 

Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MEDICARE COST CONTAINMENT 

4 PROVISIONS. 

5 Subtitle A of title VIII of the Medicare Prescription 

6 Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Pub7 lic Law 108–173) is repealed and the provisions of law 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5518 IH

1 amended by such subtitle are restored as if such subtitle 

2 had not been enacted. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





I, Richard Aland, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Accelerated Acquisitions V, Inc. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 United States Code 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
The annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


2.
The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 11, 2011





/s/ Richard AlandRichard AlandPrincipal Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial and Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS V, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS V, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed December 29, 2015. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 15
- 01185
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF K A.D. AND KE.D., CHIL DREN On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JD
- 14
- 783
- W 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Brown, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers Mother appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her two children. 1 Mother’s appointed counsel filed an Anders brief on Mother’s behalf asserting that there are no arguable grounds for reversal and the appeal is frivolous and without merit

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) ; In re D.D. , 279 S.W.3d 849, 849

– 50 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2009, pet. denied) (procedures set forth in Anders are applicable to appeal from order terminating parental rights). When an Anders brief is filed, our duty is to determine whether there are any arguable grounds for reversal and, if so, to remand the case to the trial court for the appointment of new counsel to address the issues. See In re D.D. , 279 S.W.3d at 850 (citing Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)). The Anders brief filed by Mothe r’s appellate counsel

1 The trial court also terminated Father’s parental rights. Father did not appear at trial and is not a party to this appeal; he does not challenge the termination of his parental rights

.– 2

– presents a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for reversal. Counsel conducted a thorough review of the record and analysis of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence relate d to the grounds for termination and the best interest of the children. Counsel concluded that, after diligently reviewing the record and the law, there was no reversible error about which to argue on appeal and the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to Mother and notified Mother of her right to file a pro se response. Mother did not respond or file a pro se response. We have reviewed the entire record and the Anders brief. See In re D.D. , 279 S.W.3d at
850

. We agree there is no reversible error in the record and the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s final order terminating Mother’s parental rights to her two children and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See i d

.

151185F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF KA.D. AND KE.D., CHILDREN
No. 05

- 15

- 01185

- CV On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JD

- 14

- 783

- W. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers, Justices Brown and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered this 29th day of December, 2015.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CURTIS W.
MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P.
(the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.



I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/    CURTIS W.
MEWBOURNEName:

Curtis W. MewbourneDate:

November 14, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1730

BOBBY LEE MCARTHUR; DEBORAH E. MCARTHUR, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ROBERT W. CLARK; DEBRA L. CLARK; FRED W. LEE, JR.; BARBARA OSIE LEE; JAMES ROBERT LEE; CAROL E. LEE; JOHN HENRY LEE; PATRICIA SMITH LEE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-cv-00634-FL) Submitted: March 16, 2007 Decided: April 17, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellants. H. Terry Hutchens, HUTCHENS, SENTER & BRITTON, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees Robert W. Clark and Debra L. Clark. Fred W. Lee, Jr., Barbara Osie Lee, James Robert Lee, Carol E. Lee, John Henry Lee, Patricia Smith Lee, Appellees Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bobby Lee McArthur and Deborah E. McArthur appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursua nt to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7), and denying the McArthurs’ motion for preliminary injunction as moot. We have r eviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McArthur v. Clark , No. 5:05-cv-00634-FL (E.D.N.C. May 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Michael P. Errico, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[718 NYS2d 831]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibbie Payne, J.), entered August 31, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint as against defendants City of New York and Ralph Baez, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial evidence, fairly interpreted, permitted the jury’s verdict in favor of defendants-respondents and, accordingly, the trial court properly refused to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence *(see, Johnson v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*246 AD2d 88, 94, *lv denied*92 NY2d 816). The testimony, as credited by the jury, established that defendant Baez was proceeding into the intersection at a prudent rate of speed and with the green light when the collision occurred. The court’s charge as to the issue of negligence was proper and, accordingly, provides no ground to disturb the jury’s findings.

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
----

----

**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                  13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Quarterly                  Report. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |   |                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  April 9, 2007 |   |                                                                                                      |
|                                 | By:    |  */s/* *Andrew                  Hamilton         * |
|                                 |   | Andrew                  Hamilton                                                                          |
|                                 |   | Chief                  Financial Officer                                                                  |

----