alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 207 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 207

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members, 
   officers, and employees of the House from serving on the board of 
 directors of any entity which receives funding from, or is affiliated 
with or owned or controlled by, the United Front Work Department of the 
  Chinese Communist Party, any other element of the Chinese Communist 
        Party, or any foreign adversary, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

Mr. Luttrell (for himself, Mr. Hern, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mrs. 
Miller of Illinois, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Gooden of Texas, and Mr. Ellzey) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                                on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members, 
   officers, and employees of the House from serving on the board of 
 directors of any entity which receives funding from, or is affiliated 
with or owned or controlled by, the United Front Work Department of the 
  Chinese Communist Party, any other element of the Chinese Communist 
        Party, or any foreign adversary, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING SERVICE ON BOARDS AFFILIATED WITH CHINESE 
              COMMUNIST PARTY OR FOREIGN ADVERSARIES.

    Clause 2 of rule XXV of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (d);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (e) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(f) serve--
                    ``(1) on the board of directors of any entity which 
                receives funding from, or is affiliated with or owned 
                or controlled by, the United Front Work Department of 
                the Chinese Communist Party, any other element of the 
                Chinese Communist Party, or any government or person 
                determined by the Secretary of State to be a foreign 
                adversary under section 7.4 of title 15, Code of 
                Federal Regulations as of March 1, 2023; or
                    ``(2) on any board of directors whose members 
                include any member or agent of the United Front Work 
                Department of the Chinese Communist Party, any other 
                element of the Chinese Communist Party, or any 
                government or person determined by the Secretary of 
                State to be a foreign adversary under section 7.4 of 
                title 15, Code of Federal Regulations as of March 1, 
                2023.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Mobile TeleSystems OJSC (the “Company”) hereby certifies,to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)                           theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)                        theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2006
|        | /s/ Vsevolod Rozanov     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Vsevolod Rozanov         |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-01-1996
<CASH>                                         342,318
<SECURITIES>                                12,926,074
<RECEIVABLES>                                  280,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,100
<PP&E>                                       4,154,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                 613,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,114,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          371,832
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,743,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,114,963
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,155,615
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  424,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                731,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                   731,244
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            731,244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   731,244
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-30862 and Form S-3 No.33-38902)
pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights
Plan and in the related Prospectus, and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-344489) pertaining to the LIVE Incentive
Savings Plan of our report dated April 9, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of LIVE
Entertainment Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1996.



Los Angeles, California
April 9, 1997
Andre M. BROADUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80703

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: May 29, 2018

Jeannie Willibey, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Andre Broadus appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Broadus argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion because the evidence established that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to call Broadus's brother as a witness at trial to testify that the tattoo on Broadus's hand was present on the day of the charged crimes, thus further supporting the defense theory of misidentification presented at trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5424 

To allow certain existing retirement plans maintained by churches to continue 

to provide annuities directly to participants rather than through an 

insurance company. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2006 

Mr. SOUDER (for himself and Mr. PITTS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow certain existing retirement plans maintained by 

churches to continue to provide annuities directly to participants rather than through an insurance company. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRANDFATHER RULE FOR CHURCH PLANS 

4 WHICH SELF-ANNUITIZE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any plan year end6 ing after April 17, 2002, annuity payments provided with 

7 respect to any account maintained for a participant or 

8 beneficiary under a qualified church plan shall not fail to 

9 satisfy the requirements of section 401(a)(9) of the InterVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:32 May 22, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5424.IH H5424

cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5424 IH

1 nal Revenue Code of 1986 merely because the payments 

2 are not made under an annuity contract purchased from 

3 an insurance company if such payments would not fail 

4 such requirements if provided with respect to a retirement 

5 income account described in section 403(b)(9) of such 

6 Code. 

7 (b) QUALIFIED CHURCH PLAN.—For purposes of 

8 this section, the term ‘‘qualified church plan’’ means any 

9 money purchase pension plan described in section 401(a) 

10 of such Code which— 

11 (1) is a church plan (as defined in section 

12 414(e) of such Code) with respect to which the elec13 tion provided by section 410(d) of such Code has not 

14 been made, and 

15 (2) was in existence on April 17, 2002. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Horizontal Ventures, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-60621) of our report, which
contained an explanatory paragraph regarding the company's ability to continue
as a going concern, dated April 15, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Saba Petroleum Company as of December 31, 1997 and for
the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 21, 1999
#### In the Matter of Richard Pabon, Petitioner, v Daniel A. Senkowski, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 893]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

*684Petitioner challenges a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of refusing a direct order, failing to produce his identification card and creating a disturbance. The misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it indicate that petitioner was loudly conversing with several other inmates in the corridor and refused the correction officer’s direct orders to stop talking and produce his identification card. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, this evidence constitutes substantial evidence of his guilt of the charges *(see, Matter of Gonzalez v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*277 AD2d 539). Petitioner’s claim that he was not talking and that the orders were not specifically addressed to him conflicted with the correction officer’s version of events and presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see, Matter of Di Rose v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 275*AD2d 843; *Matter of Batten v Goord, 258*AD2d 794). Finally, petitioner’s remaining contentions that the Hearing Officer was biased and improperly denied his right to documentary evidence have been reviewed and rejected as lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*Tony Mazourik

(No. 6118)

Submitted January 31, 1928.

Decided February 7, 1928.

Criminal *Law*— In *Criminal Prosecutions, Primary Evidence Must be Procured, if Available; in Criminal Prosecutions, Secondary Evidence May be Admitted. Only Where Primary Evidence is Not Obtainable.*

Primary evidence must be produced ii available. It is only where primary evidence is not obtainable that secondary evidence may be admitted.

(Criminal Law, 16 C. J. § 1202.)

(Noth: Parenthetical references by Editors, C. J. — Cyc. Not part of syllabi.)

Error to Circuit Court, Marshall County.

Tony Mazourik was convicted of possession of moonshine liquor and of having been formerly convicted of violating the prohibition laws, and he brings error.

*Reversed <md remanded.*

*A. L. Hooton*and *D. B. Evans,*for plaintiff in error.

Woods, Judge:

The defendant was found guilty under an indictment charging him with the possession of moonshine liquor, and a prior violation of the prohibition laws. The State made no appearance to this writ.

In an attempt to prove the former conviction, the justice before whom the defendant was alleged to have been arraigned was called and permitted, over objection, to testify concerning the first conviction charged in the indictment, in the absence of his records, which he stated had been misplaced. His testimony was not convincing as to the loss, mutilation or destruction of the record or the adequacy of the search therefor, which is necessary before secondary evidence to establish the existence and contents of such record may be admitted. Then, *118under see. 32, chapter 32A, Code, 1923, the prosecuting- attorney is presumed to have had on file a transcript from the justice’s docket of the judgment, which, under the statute, is made primary evidence of equal dignity with the docket of the justice. The State did not attempt to produce this transcript, or explain its failure so to do-. Not having shown that it had exhausted its resources to> supply the record, the evidence of the justice was improperly introduced. *State*v. *Lee,*103 W. Va. 631; *State*v. *Slat,*98 W. Va. 448.

Inasmuch as the case must go back for a retrial because of the foregoing error, attention is- directed to State’s instructions Nos. 1 and 4, which, while stating correct propositions of law, apply to “transporting intoxicating liquor” rather than to “possessing moonshine liquor”. The prosecuting attorney evidently confused the offense being tried with the former violation alleged in the indictment. Instruction No.' 3 is also open to criticism in that it did not qualify the words “testify falsely” with such words as “wilfully”, “knowingly”, or “corruptly”. State v. *Lee, supra.*

The questions relating to the sufficiency of the indictment raised in this Court were not called to the attention of the Court below by demurrer or otherwise, and cannot be considered here.

The judgment is reversed, the verdict of the jury set aside, and a new trial awarded defendant.

*Reversed cmd remanded.*
----

|   | 1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | Carbon      Credits International, Inc. |                                                  |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                    |                                                  |   |
| Date:      January 29,      2009 | By:                                     | /s/       Hans J. Schulte                        |   |
|                             |                                    | Name:      Hans J. Schulte                            |   |
|                             |                                    | Title:      President and Principal Executive Officer |   |
|                             |                                    |                                                  |   |

| Date:      January 29,      2009 | By:    | /s/       Ivan Braverman                                                            |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   | Name:      Ivan Braverman                                                                |   |
|                             |   | Title:      Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting      Officer |   |
|                             |   |                                                                                     |   |

----
Exhibit 99.1

II. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts (in millions)



|                  |  |                              |  |                                      |  |             |  |            |  |                       
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | ----------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------------------
|                  |  | Balance atBeginning ofPeriod |  | AdditionsCharged
toCost and Expenses |  | Deductions  |  | Other      |  | Balance atEnd ofPeriod
|December 31, 2009 |  | $21.3                        |  | $ 4.5(a)                             |  | $  (5.9)(b) |  | $   0.4(c) |  | $20.3                 
|                  |  |                              |  |                                      |  |             |  |            |  |                       
|December 31, 2008 |  | $25.2                        |  | $ 6.9(a)                             |  | $(10.2)(b)  |  | $(0.6)(c)  |  | $21.3                 
|                  |  |                              |  |                                      |  |             |  |            |  |                       
|December 31, 2007 |  | $27.4                        |  | $4.7(a)                              |  | $  (3.6)(b) |  | $(3.3)(c)  |  | $25.2                 
|                  |  |                              |  |                                      |  |             |  |            |  |                       



|(a) | Provision charged to earnings
|--- | -----------------------------

|(b) | Accounts written-off
|--- | --------------------

|(c) | Adjustments from translating at current exchange rates
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kirstin A. STEPHENS, Appellant.

WD 80230

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 3, 2018

Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Two: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Alok Ahuja, and Anthony Rex Gabbert, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Kirstin A. Stephens appeals her convictions, following a jury trial, on one count of first-degree murder ( § 565.020, RSMo ) and one count of armed criminal action ( § 571.015, RSMo ). We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2007,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report'),  the
undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of her
knowledge, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  and Exchange Act
              of 1934; and

       (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company

                                           Date: August 14, 2007

                                           /s/ JoAnne Roberts
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           JoAnne Roberts
                                           Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 89 5 . W ALTER LAW R ENCE KENNEY v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 1 8, a ju ry co n v ict ed W al t er Lawren ce Ken n ey , wh o rep res en ted h i m s el f

at tri al
, o f ag g rav at ed c h i l d m o l e s t at i o n, rap e, in ces t , an d m u l t i p l e co u n t s o f ch i ld

m o les t at i o n

. Aft er t he tri al co u rt en t ered an o rd er d en y i n g h i s m ot i o n fo r n ew t ri al o n Sep tem b er 1 1
, 2 0 20
, K en n ey fi l ed h i s p ro s e n o t i ce o f ap p eal o n Decem b er 16
, 2 0 2 0.
W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n b ecau s e t h e n ot i ce o f ap p eal i s u n t i m el y

. Pu rs uan t to OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a), a n o t i ce o f ap p eal m us t b e fi led w i t hi n 3 0 day s

o f en t ry o f t h e o rd er o n ap p eal . Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s

an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i c t i on u po n t h i s Co u rt

. Co uch v. Un i t ed
Pa p er wo r ker s In t l

. Un i o n , 2 24 Ga. Ap p

. 72 1
, 7 21 (4 8 2 SE2 d 7 0 4 ) (1 9 9 7 )

. H e r e, Ken ney fi l ed hi s n ot i ce of ap peal 9 6 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd er. 1 Hi s ap p eal i s
t h erefo re u n ti m el y , an d i t i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 It ap p ears t h at Ken ney fi led a p ro s e m o t i o n fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal o n Decem b er 4
, 2 02 0

. Th at m ot io n , al o n g wi t h o t her p ro s e m o t i o n s , w as d en i ed b y t h e t ri al co u rt o n Decem

b er 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

. January 28, 2021

01/28/2021