alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

## Notice of Meeting

The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a meeting on  April 1, 2009, Room T2-B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the ACRS, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

*Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 12 p.m.-1 p.m.*

The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related matters. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.

                    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Officer, Mr. Sam Duraiswamy (Telephone: 301-415-7364) between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).                          ( print page 11139)    

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Officer between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda.

Dated: March 10, 2009. 

Cayetano Santos,

Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.

 [FR Doc. E9-5613 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Fitzgerald HARRIS, Defendant.

No. COA18-910

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 4, 2019

NO ERROR.
#### Andy Antonovich *v.*State Compensation Commissioner

(No. 6977)

Submitted March 4, 1931.

Decided March 10, 1931.

*274
      *Killis Townsend,*for relator.

*Howard B. Lee,*Attorney General, *B. Dennis Steed,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Geo. D. Moore,*for respondents.

Litz, President:

The petitioner, Andy Antonovich, was struck by falling slate, November 18, 1929, in the course of his employment as a coal miner for The Collieries Company, a subscriber to the Workmen’s Compensation Fund. The blow produced a compression fracture of the lumbar vertebrae which resulted in flaccid paralysis, rendering him helpless and unable to eliminate urine or other waste matter. He was immediately conveyed to the Mountain State Hospital at Charleston and there treated until August 4, 1930; was then taken to Davy, McDowell County; and returned to the hospital November 4, 1930, where he has since remained. He seeks a writ of mandamus in this proceeding to compel the state compensation commissioner to pay the hospital the sum of eight hundred dollars in partial settlement of its charges for the treatment it has already furnished him.

Section 27, chapter 68, Acts 1925, requires the compensation commissioner to extend for personal injury to an employee entitled to participate in the compensation fund such sums for medical, surgical and hospital treatment as in the opinion of the commissioner may reasonably be required not exceeding eight hundred dollars; unless the injured employee is entitled to such treatment under a contract connected with his employment or “by reason of a subscription list to medical, surgical or hospital treatment without further charge to him.”

The commissioner offers as a defense to the petition a contract between said hospital and the employer (in effect at the time of the injury) whereby the hospital agreed, in consideration of one dollar per month, paid from the wages of *275an employee, to furnish him and his dependents “All necessary hospital and professional services both medical and surgical including room, board and regular nursing in the wards” of the hospital, except for numerous specified ailments, including “chronic or incurable diseases”.

The hospital, though named and served as a respondent, does not answer. It is contended, however, by counsel for petitioner that he is inflicted with a chronic or incurable disease within the meaning of the exceptions enumerated in the contract; the theory being that his debility is permanent and will not yield to treatment. The opinions of two physicians, relied on to establish such an hypothesis, is merely to the effect that the condition of Antonovich responds very slowly to treatment and that there is no chance for his *complete*recovery. Having concluded that the petitioner was entitled, under the contract, to the treatment he has received from the hospital, the writ will be denied. “One seeking relief by mandamus must show a clear legal right to the remedy.” *State ex rel. Goshorn*v. *Johnson, Treasurer,*102 W. Va. 629.

*Writ denied.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 562 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 562

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2005

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To authorize the Government of Ukraine to establish a memorial on 
 Federal land in the District of Columbia to honor the victims of the 
         manmade famine that occurred in Ukraine in 1932-1933.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

    (a) In General.--The Government of Ukraine is authorized to 
establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 
honor the victims of the Ukrainian famine-genocide of 1932-1933.
    (b) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The 
establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance with chapter 89 of 
title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the ``Commemorative 
Works Act''), except that sections 8902(a)(1), 8906(b)(1), 8908(b)(2), 
and 8909(b) shall not apply with respect to the memorial.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

    The United States Government shall not pay any expense for the 
establishment of the memorial or its maintenance.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8521
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDDIE JEFFERSON, a/k/a Ice, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-314-A) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Eric Urofsky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for evidentiary hearing on the evidence, merits and testimony of defendant's substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jefferson , No. CR-92-314-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<page>   EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:   /s/ Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 14, 2006





? 6 ?


MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)







- 44 -

- 45 -
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Crit S. DeMent, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 ofLease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) [omission in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8760 (December 15, 2006)] for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) [omission in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8760 (December 15, 2006)];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 15, 2007 /s/ Crit S. DeMent   Name:  Crit S. DeMent   Title:  Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer E-2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC (the “Company”) for thequarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Miller,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert  J. Miller                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Robert J. Miller                      |
|   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Dated: November 15, 2004         |

 

----
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Primus Guaranty, Ltd., a Bermuda company (the Company), on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas W. Jasper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Richard Claiden, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: November 10, 2008 /s/ Thomas W. Jasper
Thomas W. Jasper
Chief Executive Officer /s/ Richard Claiden
Richard Claiden
Chief Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SE PTEMBER 26, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00062

- CR

Ex parte Jolando King

APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FIELD , AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPE LLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the tr i a l court

. Appellant has filed

a motion to withdraw his appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows appellant to

withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 10.79





Exhibit 10.79




AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD GRANT NOTICE

2005 STOCK PLAN




On the date set forth below, American Reprographics Company (the “Company”), pursuant to its 2005
Stock Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), awarded to Participant the number of shares of the Company’s
Common Stock set forth below (“Award”). This Award is subject to all of the terms and conditions
as set forth herein, the Restricted Stock Award Agreement, the Plan, the Assignment Separate from
Certificate, and the Joint Escrow Instructions, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated
herein in their entirety.



	 	 	 
	Participant:
	 	Dilantha (Dilo) Wiljesuriya
	 
	 	 
	Date of Grant:
	 	October 28, 2009
	 
	 	 
	Number of Shares Subject to Award:
	 	30,000
	 
	 	 
	Fair Market Value (per share)
	 	$6.11 per share
	 
	 	 
	Consideration:
	 	Past services
	 
	 	 
	Vesting Schedule:
	 	5 years; with 20% vesting on each
anniversary date of the date of grant, subject to continuous service to the Company or an affiliate thereof






Additional Terms/Acknowledgements: The undersigned Participant acknowledges receipt of, and
understands and agrees to the terms of this Grant Notice and attached Restricted Stock Award
Agreement, the Assignment Separate of Certificate and the Joint Escrow Instructions. Participant
further acknowledges that as of the Date of Grant, this Grant Notice, the Restricted Stock Award
Agreement, the Plan, the Assignment Separate from Certificate, and the Joint Escrow Instructions
set forth the entire understanding between Participant and the Company regarding the shares subject
to the Award and supersede all prior oral and written agreements on that subject.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS

COMPANY	 	PARTICIPANT:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ JONATHAN MATHER	 	/s/ DILANTHA WILJESURIYA	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Signature	 	Signature	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	Chief Financial Officer
	 	Date: November 18, 2009	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	November 10, 2009	 	 	 	 






RETURN THIS SIGNED NOTICE TO: Tracey Luttrell, Corporate Counsel, American Reprographics Company,
1981 N. Broadway, Suite 385, Walnut Creek, CA 94596



ATTACHMENTS: Restricted Stock Award Agreement, 2005 Stock Plan (as amended), Assignment Separate
From Certificate, Joint Escrow Instructions
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.27 
 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 
 Directors who
are not officers of SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $52,000 and $2,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend via telephone and $4,000 for every regular and special
Board and Committee meeting they attend in person. 
 Each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company is also
granted options and Common Stock pursuant to the SEACOR Holding Inc.’s 2007 Share Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1999
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         492,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               677,393
<PP&E>                                      12,927,344
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,529,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,074,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,074,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,074,771
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,132,399
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  841,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   155,193
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>