alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VAN'S TRANSPORT, LLC, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

WD 81603

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: February 19, 2019

Michael G. Mueth, Jr., Saint Louis, for Appellant

Larry R. Ruhmann, St Louis, for Respondent

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Van's Transport, LLC appeals two decisions of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. One determined that several workers, engaged as drivers, performed services for wages in employment by Van's Transport within the meaning of those terms in sections 288.034 and 288.036, and the second affirmed two assessments for contributions, interest, and penalties under section 288.160, RSMo. 2016. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The decisions are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5606 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5606

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 221 and 211 West Ferguson Street in Tyler, Texas, as the ``William M. 
         Steger Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 221 
and 211 West Ferguson Street in Tyler, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William M. Steger Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``William M. Steger Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   September 10, 2009
    /s/ Peter A. EdisonPeter A. EdisonChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer)
| 1.     | Such      quarterly report of Form 10-K/A for the period ending August 31, 2008,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such annual report of Form 10-K/A for the quarter      ending August 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Artistry Publications,      Inc. |

|                         | CHINA      GREEN, INC. |                                                                           |
|------------------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                   |                                                                           |   |
| Date:      November 30, 2009 | By:                    | /s/ Tai      Chi Yip                        |   |
|                         |                   | Tai      Chi YipChief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer  |   |
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Alpine Alpha 1, Ltd. (the
“Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)           The
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
March 31, 2009





/s/ James
Hahn


James
Hahn


Chief
Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) &


Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
TierOne Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
            period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  May 9, 2003                     By: /s/ Gilbert G. Lundstrom
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of
                                           the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to TierOne Corporation and will be retained
by TierOne Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of AmbiCom Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Hwang, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and (2) the information contained in the Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 7, 2011
/s/ John HwangName:  John HwangTitle:  Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officerand Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
AMALGAM SEPARATORS EVALUATIONS

UPDATED June 21, 2004

The following amalgam separators have been tested in accordance with ISO 11143 and has received 

efficiency rating of 98% or greater, and have been evaluated by the Maine DEP and found to be “tota

NOTE: There may be other companies that have units that could meet the criteria mentioned ab

companies so desire, they can submit the appropriate information to the Maine DEP. Once it has bee

to meet the criteria of the applicable laws, then Maine DEP will add these units to the list below.

Amalgam Separator Units

Meeting 98% Removal Efficiency Criteria &

Meeting Maine DEP criteria for totally enclosed.

Manufacturer

Distributor

Amalgam

Separator

Model

Number

Removal

Technology

Minimum

Removal

Efficiency

Certified

Flow Rate

T

En

Requ

(Ma

Eva

RebecP.O. Box 658Edmunds, WA 98020800-569-1088

RME 2000

Catch 400

Catch 1000Catch 9000

Sedimentation 99.6 1 Liter / Min

Ev

Meets 

requ

bein

en

SEE CONTINUATION OF TABLE ON NEXT PAGE
Amalgam Separator Units

Meeting 98% Removal Efficiency Criteria &

Meeting Maine DEP criteria for totally enclosed.

Manufacturer

Distributor

Amalgam

Separator

Model

Number

Removal

Technology

Minimum

Removal

Efficiency

Certified

Flow Rate

Totally 

Requ

(Mai

Eva

A B Dental Trends211 Grover StreetLynden, WA 982641-360-354-4722

890-6000 (dry)

890-1000 (wet) NA

Sedimentation

Filtration

Ion Exchange

99.3 2 Liters / Min

Ev

Meets 

requirem

“totally 

American DentalAccessories, Inc.7310 Oxford StreetMinneapolis, MN55426-45131-800-331-7993

AS-9

Super

Premium

NA Filtration 98.5 1 Liter / Min

Ev

Meets 

requirem

“totally 

Maximum SeparationSystems Inc.6588 Sooke RoadSooke, BC V0S 1N0Canada800-799-7147

Amalgam

Separator

Model

1000

Sedimentation

Filtration 98.6 1 Liter / Min

Ev

Meets 

requirem

“totally 

SolmeteX50 Bearfoot RoadSuite 2Northborough, MA01532800-216-5505

Hg 5 NA

Sedimentation

Filtration

Ion Exchange

99.28 0.05 Liters / Min

Ev

Meets 

requirem

“totally 

SolmeteX50 Bearfoot RoadSuite 2Northborough, MA01532800-216-5505

Hg 5 HV NA

Sedimentation

Filtration

Ion Exchange

98.5 1 Liter / Min

Ev

Meets 

requirem

“totally 

SEE CONTINUATION OF TABLE ON NEXT PAGE
Amalgam Separator Units

Meeting 98% Removal Efficiency Criteria &

Meeting Maine DEP criteria for totally enclosed.

Manufacturer

Distributor

Amalgam

Separator

Model

Number

Removal

Technology

Minimum

Removal

Efficiency

Certified

Flow Rate

Totally 

Requ

(Mai

Eva

American DentalAccessories, Inc.7310 Oxford StreetMinneapolis, MN55426-45131-800-331-7993

AD-1000 NA

Sedimentation

Filtration

Ion Exchange

99.3 2 Liter / Min

Ev

Meets 

requirem

“totally
EXHIBIT 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
TierOne Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
          period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  November 14, 2002           By: /s/ Gilbert G. Lundstrom
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of
                                        the Board and Chief Executive Officer
















                                  36
Mary GULATH, Respondent, v. Michael HORWITZ, et al., Appellants.

No. ED 105690

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Filed: May 22, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 27, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018

Genevieve Nichols, Mary E. Coffey, 6202 Columbia Ave., St. Louis, MO 63139, For Plaintiff/Appellant.

Ryan Gavin, Michael C. Schroeder, 222 S. Central Ave. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63105, For Defendant/Appellant.

Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Michael Horwitz, DPM, and Feet For Life Centers Professional Corporation (collectively, "Appellants") appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding Mary Gulath ("Gulath") $628,000 on her medical malpractice claim that Appellants negligently performed cryosurgery on her feet. Appellants assert four points on appeal. First, Appellants argue that the trial court erred in submitting Gulath's verdict directing instruction because it was improper and prejudicial to Appellants. Second, Appellants claim that the trial court erred in denying Appellants' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because it erroneously found that Gulath made a submissible case. Third, Appellants contend that the trial court erred in permitting Gulath to admit into evidence a medical record that was not timely disclosed to Appellants. And finally, Appellants argue that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence and allowing recovery for the amounts Appellants charged Gulath for the cryosurgery and related medical services. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
### Contacts. With whom outside the FAAhasthis proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response National 8usiness Aircr;lft Association Eli Cotti 21812010



# ---- I{egionill AirlillC Association I Da~'cl.ot/Cl'cr 2/812010 

# --- I Aircraft Owners & Pilots Associatio/l Robert Ha{~kJIlan 2/812010 I 

### ~ , AT':'\' !\1LOI)CZ 2/812010 

### ~
Exhibit 32.2

AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, I, Martin Wolfe, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Bravo Multinational Incorporated.

Date: April 27, 2016

/s/ Martin Wolfe

Martin Wolfe, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clarence Tucker, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 589]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered September 14, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions that the prosecutor failed to lay a proper foundation before cross-examining the defendant’s alibi witness, and that the court failed to give a related jury instruction, are unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Lazarini,*270 AD2d 361; *People v Douglas,*248 AD2d 550). In any event, a sufficient foundation was laid for the cross-*489examination of the witness and the court properly instructed the jury (see, *People v Dawson,*50 NY2d 311).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Sir:

As residents of northern Arizona, we are deeply concerned about the potential effect of your rule

requiring the Apache Power Plant, the Coronado Power Plant, and the Cholla Power Plant to

achieve 0.05 lbs/Mmbtu NOx. We are told that some of these plants are presently running atabout 0.2 lbs/Mmbtu after they made hundreds of millions of dollars in extensive improvements

to Increase NOx, 502 and particulate removal. We understand that these improvements were

made to improve air quality for us as residents. We also understand that we as customers will

pay for these improvements. We accept that they were necessary.

We are told that the NOx removal requirement you are proposing for these plants is likely to

have the effect of forcing their closure. This would have a devastating impact on northern

Arizona’s economy, which is already suffering because of the closure of the Paper Mill in

Snowflake. The closure of the Paper Mill will cost the region more than 300 jobs directly, and

many more indirectly. The Imposition of the 0.05 lbs/Mmbtu requirement could have a

compound effect, drawing the region into an economic crisis of tragic proportions.

We are told that the purpose of the 0.05 lbs/Mmbtu requirement is to reduce regional haze and

to thereby improve visibility. We are also told that the difference between the NOx emissions

presently achieved by these plants and the 0.05 lbs/Mmbtu you propose will not be visible to us

or to those who visit the Grand Canyon, the Petrified Forest, or the other national parks in

Arizona. This deepens the tragedy of the impact. Families, businesses, societies and culturesthat have been here for generations will be harmed irreparably or lost. We believe that this is

neither reasonable, nor fair, nor just.

We believe that the future of Northern Arizona and its residents is at stake with the

Implementation of your proposal. We therefore urge you in the most sincere and grave manner

we are able to convey in this letter to reconsider your proposal to require these plants to achieve0.05 lbs/Mmbtu NOx. We ask that you find a solution that does not harm the people of northern

Arizona, and that will enable them to pursue the lives they are entitled to, as are all Americans.We ask that you give full consideration of the potentially tragic economic consequences of

implementing this rule, especially and specifically when, viewed in terms of the extremelymarginal impact on regional haze and visibility.

Ily,

Winslow, AZ 86047
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of Keating Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Timothy J. Keating, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











/s/ Timothy J. KeatingName:
Timothy J. KeatingDate:
February 28, 2011
exv10w19







Exhibit 10.19



[Compellent Technologies, Inc. Letterhead]



July 30, 2009




Sherman Black

10764 Purdey Road

Eden Prairie, MN 55347



Dear Sherman,



On behalf of the Compellent Technologies Board of Directors and team, I am pleased to extend this
offer for you to join our Board of Directors effective July 30, 2009.



This offer includes board fees of $20,500 per year and $6,000 per year for membership on the Audit
Committee. All fees are paid quarterly during the third month of the quarter.



In addition to the cash fees above, you will also be granted a stock option valued at $250,000
using the pricing variables of the Black-Scholes option valuation model. I currently estimate this
will approximate 31,250 shares but the exact number will be calculated as of your start date. The
exercise price will be the “Fair Market Value” of the Company’s Common Stock as determined in
accordance with the terms of the 2007 Plan, which is the closing price as reported on the NYSE on
the grant date. The terms and vesting associated with these options are contained in the Employee
Stock Option Agreement which is included with this letter. The option will vest over three years.



Your acceptance signature below indicates that Compellent has discussed the need to honor the
confidentiality of current and previous employers’ and board directorship’s proprietary assets, has
specifically informed you not to bring any proprietary assets belonging to a third party to
Compellent, and that you understand that it is not acceptable for you to use those assets which
rightfully belong to a current or previous employer or board directorships. Your acceptance
signature below also indicates that you are not under any contractual obligations to any previous
employer or third party that would preclude your membership on the Board of Directors with
Compellent.



Sherman, the entire Compellent team is excited to have you join the team! Please signify your
acceptance to this offer with your signature below and return a signed copy to Jack Judd, Chief
Financial Officer, by July 31, 2009. Congratulations!




	 	 	 
	Sincerely,

	 	Accepted by:
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Phil Soran

	 	/s/ Sherman Black
	 
	 	 
	Phil Soran

	 	Date: 7/30/09
	President & CEO
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Enclosures