alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Policy on Cash Back Awards and Equity Awards "Clawback"



 Exhibit 10.37 
  

					
	
 



	 		  	 Policy on Cash Bonus Awards and
 Equity Awards “Clawback”
 for
 CDI Corp. and its Related Companies

	 		  
	 		  

  
  
  
 All cash bonus awards and all equity
awards made within the CDI organization are made on the assumption that the information on which they are based is correct. If, after an award is made, it is determined that the award was based on incorrect information, the Company, at the
discretion of the CDI Corp. Compensation Committee (“the Committee”), may cancel and recoup (or “claw back”) all or such portion of the award as the Committee deems appropriate. 
 This policy will apply whether the error in the information occurred as a result of oversight, negligence or intentional misconduct
(including fraud). The Committee will have the discretion to treat employees who received an award based on incorrect information differently depending on an employee’s degree of involvement in causing the error, an employee’s assistance
in discovering and/or correcting the error, and any other facts that the Committee determines to be relevant. 
 The Company
will take such action as it determines to be warranted with respect to employees the Company determines to have caused the error, including disciplinary measures up to and including termination of employment and, with respect to any employee
reasonably believed to have engaged in intentional misconduct (including fraud), the initiation of appropriate legal proceedings. 
 In the event the Committee decides to cancel and claw back an award, the employees who are subject to the cancellation and claw back will be so notified and will be required to return to the Company the amount of the cash bonus and/or the
equity units received in the award within the timeframe specified by the Committee. If an employee does not return the amount of the cash bonus and/or the equity award as instructed by the Committee, the Company will, in its discretion, take all
action that it deems appropriate, including legal action and setting off the amount to be returned against other amounts payable by the Company to the employee, in order to effect the return. 
 In this policy “Company” refers to CDI Corp., CDI Corporation or any other company in the CDI organization, as the context
requires. “Equity” means stock options, restricted stock, time-vested deferred stock, performance-contingent deferred stock, any other stock-related award under the CDI Corp. 2004 Omnibus Stock Plan and any matching stock-related
contribution under the CDI Corp. Stock Purchase Plan for Management Employees and Non-Employee Directors. “Equity” also includes any shares of CDI stock into which an award of equity units may have been converted and, if those shares have
been sold, the proceeds, including any gain, from the sale of such shares. “Cash Bonus” includes cash commissions. “Employees” includes former employees and independent contractors. 
 The Company’s rights under this policy are in addition to any other clawback or other rights it may have in any other policy or
agreement.
tmok2009ex10_19.htm


    Exhibit
10.19

     

    

      SUMMARY OF ANNUAL
NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

      


      


      


      I.            
Board Members (Other
than the Chairman)

      


      A.           
Annual Cash Compensation

       

             
Annual Cash
Retainer:                                                                                                         
$80,000

       

                     
Additional Cash Retainer for Chairman of Audit
Committee:                                        
$20,000

       

                     
Additional
Cash Retainer for Chairs of Compensation Committee,

             
Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, Strategy and 

             
Finance Committee
and Corporate Social Responsibility
Committee:                           $10,000

       

      B.   Equity
Compensation

       

                    
Annual equity grants are made upon the recommendation of the Compensation
Committee.


      II.           
Chairman of the
Board

      


      A.           Annual
Cash Compensation

      


      Annual
Cash Compensation (in lieu of annual retainer):                    
$250,000

      


      B.           Equity
Compensation

      


      Annual
equity grants are made upon the recommendation of the Compensation
Committee.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-51220

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Nazario Pizarro-Espinoza, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-338-3

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Nazario Pizarro-Espinoza has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Pizarro-Espinoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 23, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-51220 Document: 00516368888 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2022
No. 21-51220

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-51220 Document: 00516368888 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/23/2022
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 275 

Supporting the designation of Vaisakhi, April 14 of each year, as ‘‘National 

Sikh Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2023 

Ms. SCANLON (for herself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. TONKO, 

Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. PALLONE, and Mr. VALADAO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of Vaisakhi, April 14 of each 

year, as ‘‘National Sikh Day’’. 

Whereas the United States is enriched by the diversity of its 

residents, who have cultivated a climate of social tolerance and intellectual pluralism that has sustained the 

Nation throughout its history; 

Whereas the Sikh community, which originated in Punjab, 

India, and began immigrating into the United States over 

100 years ago, has played an important role in developing the United States; 

Whereas Sikhism is the world’s fifth-largest religion with 

nearly 30,000,000 adherents, roughly 1,000,000 of whom 

call the United States home; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 275 IH 

Whereas, founded by Guru Nanak in the Punjab region of 

India during the 15th century, the Sikh spiritual tradition is rooted in the belief that every person, regardless 

of race, gender, sex, or creed, is equal before God; 

Whereas believing that every person shares a connection 

through the oneness of God, the Sikh community 

emerged as a force for social justice by encouraging female participation in religious services and initiating 

interfaith efforts to combat oppression and injustice; 

Whereas the Sikh religion’s central principles of truthful living, service to humanity, and devotion to God also inspire 

its believers to create inclusive communities where all are 

respected; 

Whereas through leading charitable events, the Sikh community embodies the sense of public service that underlies 

the founding principles of the United States; 

Whereas the people of the United States feel obliged to honor 

the Sikh community’s important role in supporting and 

enriching the social fabric of the Nation; 

Whereas Sikhs celebrate Vaisakhi on the first day of the 

month of Vaisakh in the Sikh calendar, which typically 

falls on April 14; 

Whereas Vaisakhi is a special occasion in which Sikhs remember the founding in 1699 of the Order of Khalsa, a 

fellowship of devout saint-soldier Sikhs, by the 10th Sikh 

Guru to fight tyranny and oppression, which played an 

important role in shaping the religion’s history and identity; and 

Whereas it is altogether fitting and proper to celebrate the 

day of Vaisakhi alongside Sikhs throughout the world 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 275 IH 

and to honor the lasting contributions made by the Sikh 

community to the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘National Sikh Day’’ to honor and cele3 brate the important role played by the Sikh community 

4 in strengthening and inspiring the people of the United 

5 States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ James R. Mulvihill 
|                      |  |  |  | James R. Mulvihill     
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
In the MATTER OF: The Elvira H. JUBEL Trust

No. ED 105758

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: November 6, 2018

Richard A. Wunderlich, Jacqueline K. Graves, Co-Counsel, 600 Washington Ave, Suite 2500, Saint Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.

Michael W. Bartolacci, Maria G. Zschoche, Co-Counsel, One US Bank Plaza, Saint Louis, MO. 63101, for respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Donald A. Jubel, Melissa Jubel Markwort, Lindsey M. Jubel, and Lance A. Jubel appeal from the order and judgment of the trial court declaring, in favor of Christine Ann Homan, the Sixth Amendment to the Indenture of Trust of Elvira H. Jubel invalid due to a lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).
EXHIBIT 12
 PRIMUS GUARANTY, LTD
 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED
DISTRIBUTIONS OF SUBSIDIARY
 Three Months EndedMarch 31,
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings (loss):Net earnings (loss)
    
    $
    106,808
    
    
    $
    (1,716,146
    )
    
    $
    (563,541
    )
    
    $
    94,891
    
    
    $
    4,083
    
    
    $
    23,685Provision (benefit) for taxes
    
    
    142
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    52
    
    
    
    42
    
    
    
    46
    
    
    
    46Distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    944
    
    
    
    6,642
    
    
    
    7,568
    
    
    
    5,683
    
    
    
    3,865
    
    
    
    2,138Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes (a)
    
    
    107,894
    
    
    
    (1,709,443
    )
    
    
    (555,921
    )
    
    
    100,616
    
    
    
    7,994
    
    
    
    25,869Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    3,702
    
    
    
    23,674
    
    
    
    28,297
    
    
    
    16,532
    
    
    
    6,525
    
    
    
    3,019Subtract:Distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    (944
    )
    
    
    (6,642
    )
    
    
    (7,568
    )
    
    
    (5,683
    )
    
    
    (3,865
    )
    
    
    (2,138
    )Adjusted earnings (loss)
    
    $
    110,652
    
    
    $
    (1,692,411
    )
    
    $
    (535,192
    )
    
    $
    111,465
    
    
    $
    10,654
    
    
    $
    26,750Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    2,758
    
    
    
    17,032
    
    
    
    20,729
    
    
    
    10,849
    
    
    
    2,660
    
    
    
    881Distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary
    
    
    944
    
    
    
    6,642
    
    
    
    7,568
    
    
    
    5,683
    
    
    
    3,865
    
    
    
    2,138Total fixed charges and preferred distributions
    
    $
    3,702
    
    
    $
    23,674
    
    
    $
    28,297
    
    
    $
    16,532
    
    
    $
    6,525
    
    
    $
    3,019Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary (b)
    
    
    29.89
    
    
    
    (71.49
    )
    
    
    (18.91
    )
    
    
    6.74
    
    
    
    1.63
    
    
    
    8.86
 (a)
    
    Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes represents income (loss) before income
taxes plus adding back
distributions on preferred securities of subsidiary.(b)
    
    Due to the losses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, the ratio
coverage was less than 1:1.
Additional earnings of approximately $1.7 billion and $563.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, would be needed to achieve the coverage ratio of 1:1.
[No. 22149-1-III.

Division Three.

April 27, 2004.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Bonita Fay Radke, *Respondent,*and Robert Eugene Radke, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Walla Walla County, No. 00-3-00332-8, Donald W. Schacht, J., entered May 1, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Kurtz and Brown, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gaylord M. Karren, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



DATE:  November 19, 2003







/s/ Gaylord M. Karren___________

Gaylord M. Karren

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TierOne Corporation (Company), hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               June 30, 2009 (Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 5, 2009 | By:  /s/ Gilbert G. Lundstyrom       
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                      | Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of the
|                      | Board and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**FORM10-QSB**

**Section1350 Certification**

# **Quarterended June 30, 2006**

I, James B. Druck, ChiefExecutive Officer of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”) certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                               TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the second quarter endedJune 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15. U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

(2)                               Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2006
|   |  /s/  James B. Druck |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | James B. Druck            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0092

_________________ IN THE MATTER OF: F.S., Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classifi ed for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Amy Eddy, District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 15 2021

09/15/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0092
| 1.     | Such annual report of Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such annual report of Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Green, Inc. |

| Date: October 13, 2010                           |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |
| CHINA GREEN, INC.                                |
|                                             |
| By: /s/ Chi Yip Tai                              |
| Chi Yip TaiPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                             |
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David M. YOUNCE, Appellant.

WD 80285

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: December 18, 2018

Shaun Mackelprang, for Respondent

William J. Swift, Columbia, for Appellant

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Lisa White Hardwick, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

David Younce appeals his convictions of the class A misdemeanor third-degree domestic assault, the class D felony unlawful use of a weapon, and two counts of the class A misdemeanor second-degree endangering the welfare of a child. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State's objection to a witness's testimony regarding prior inconsistent statements of another witness. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 54 (Monday, March 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 12176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6191]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 17, 2009.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, and 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 22, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number 1545-1954.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Form: 13704.
    Title: Health Coverage Tax Credit Registration Update Form.
    Description: Internal Revenue Code Sections 35 and 7527 enacted by 
Public Law 107-210 (see attachment) require the Internal Revenue 
Service to provide payments of the HCTC to eligible individuals 
beginning August 1, 2003. The IRS will use the Registration Update Form 
to ensure, that the processes and communications for delivering these 
payments help taxpayers determine if they are eligible for the credit 
and understand what they need to do to continue to receive it.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,100 hours.
    Clearance Officer: R. Joseph Durbala (202) 622-3634, Internal 
Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed (202) 395-7873, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-6191 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### E. T. Smith, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. W. G. Welles et al., *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Decision Filed April 4, 1928.

*John B. Singletary,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Leitner & Leitner,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.