11538 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices 

946TH—MEETING—Continued 

Item No. Docket No. Company 

EL03–202–007 ............................................ TransAlta Energy Marketing (U.S.), Inc. and TransAlta Energy Marketing (California), 

Inc. 

EL03–203–005 ............................................ Valley Electric Association, Inc. 

EL02–114–030 ............................................ Portland General Electric Company. 

EL02–115–034 ............................................ Enron Power Marketing, Inc. 

E–21 ...... RM08–7–000, RM08–7–001 ....................... Modification of Interchange and Transmission Loading Relief Reliability Standards; and 

Electric Reliability Organization Interpretation of Specific Requirements of Four Reliability Standards. 

E–22 ...... PL09–4–000 ................................................ Smart Grid Policy. 

Gas 

G–1 ........ RP09–3–000, P09–7–000, RP09–7–001, 

RP09–7–002.

Texas Gas Transmission, LLC. 

G–2 ........ RP08–426–000 ............................................ El Paso Natural Gas Company. 

G–3 ........ OMITTED. 

Hydro 

H–1 ........ P–13164–001 .............................................. Bangor Water District. 

H–2 ........ P–2082–053 ................................................ PacifiCorp. 

Certificates 

C–1 ........ CP08–431–000 ............................................ Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation. 

C–2 ........ CP05–130–000, CP05–130–001, CP05– 

130–002, CP05–130–003, CP05–130– 

005, CP05–132–000, CP05–132–001, 

CP05–132–002, CP05–132–004, CP05– 

395–000, CP05–395–001, CP05–395– 

004.

Dominion Cove Point, LNG., LP. 

CP05–131–000, CP05–131–001, CP05– 

131–002, CP05–131–004.

Dominion Transmission, Inc. 

C–3 ........ CP08–104–000 ............................................ Southern Natural Gas Company. 

C–4 ........ CP08–441–000 ............................................ CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company. 

CP08–444–000 ............................................ Texas Eastern Transmission, LP. 

C–5 ........ OMITTED. 

C–6 ........ CP09–1–000 ................................................ Collbran Valley Gas Gathering, LLC. 

C–7 ........ CP09–19–000 .............................................. Port Barre Investments, L.L.C. d/b/a/ Bobcat Gas Storage. 

C–8 ........ CP06–398–001 ............................................ MoBay Storage Hub, LLC. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

A free Web cast of this event is 

available through http://www.ferc.gov. 

Anyone with Internet access who 

desires to view this event can do so by 

navigating to http://www.ferc.gov’s 

Calendar of Events and locating this 

event in the Calendar. The event will 

contain a link to its Web cast. The 

Capitol Connection provides technical 

support for the free Web casts. It also 

offers access to this event via television 

in the DC area and via phone bridge for 

a fee. If you have any questions, visit 

http://www.CapitolConnection.org or 

contact Danelle Springer or David 

Reininger at 703–993–3100. 

Immediately following the conclusion 

of the Commission Meeting, a press 

briefing will be held in the Commission 

Meeting Room. Members of the public 

may view this briefing in the designated 

overflow room. This statement is 

intended to notify the public that the 

press briefings that follow Commission 

meetings may now be viewed remotely 

at Commission headquarters, but will 

not be telecast through the Capitol 

Connection service. 

[FR Doc. E9–5770 Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[ Docket No. PR09–19–000] 

Crosstex LIG, LLC; Notice of Petition 

for Rate Approval 

March 11, 2009. 

Take notice that on March 3, 2009, 

Crosstex LIG, LLC (CLIG) filed pursuant 

to section 284.123(b)(2) of the 

Commission’s regulations, a petition 

requesting approval of rates pursuant to 

section 311(a)(2) of the Natural Gas 

Policy Act. CLIG proposes to change 

from its currently effective system-wide 

rates to zone rates. CLIG states that the 

cost-justified maximum rates for firm 

transportation service on the North 

Zone consist of a monthly demand 

charge of $68.3014 per MMBtu, a usage 

charge of $0.0100 per MMBtu and 

Interruptible and Overrun charges of 

$2.2555 per MMBtu. On the South 

Zone, CLIG states that the cost-justified 

maximum rates for firm transportation 

service consist of a monthly demand 

charge of $4.2461 per MMBtu, a usage 

charge of $0.0007 per MMBtu and 

Interruptible and Overrun charges of 

$0.1403 per MMBtu. Further, CLIG 

proposes to have a single Statement of 

Operating Conditions, (SOC) which will 

replace its existing SOCs for firm and 

interruptible transportation service. 

Any person desiring to participate in 

this rate proceeding must file a motion 

to intervene or to protest this filing must 

file in accordance with Rules 211 and 

214 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 

and 385.214). Protests will be 


tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices 11539 

1Pipeline Posting Requirements under Section 23 

of the Natural Gas Act, Order No. 720, FERC Stats. 

& Regs. ¶ 31,281 (2008). 

considered by the Commission in 

determining the appropriate action to be 

taken, but will not serve to make 

protestants parties to the proceeding. 

Any person wishing to become a party 

must file a notice of intervention or 

motion to intervene, as appropriate. 

Such notices, motions, or protests must 

be filed on or before the date as 

indicated below. Anyone filing an 

intervention or protest must serve a 

copy of that document on the Applicant. 

Anyone filing an intervention or protest 

on or before the intervention or protest 

date need not serve motions to intervene 

or protests on persons other than the 

Applicant. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper using the 

‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

This filing is accessible on-line at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

Wednesday, March 25, 2009. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–5775 Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket Nos. ER09–556–000; Docket Nos. 

ER09–556–000; and ER06–615–039; ER08– 

367–003] 

California Independent System 

Operator Corporation; Notice 

Shortening Answer Period 

March 11, 2009. 

On March 6, 2009, the California 

Independent System Operator 

Corporation (CAISO) filed a Motion to 

Modify Effective Date of Certain 

Proposed Tariff Revisions and for 

Expedited Answer Period (March 6 

Motion). In the filing, CAISO requests 

that the Commission establish an 

expedited time period to file answers to 

the motion in order to facilitate 

Commission consideration of the 

motion. By this notice, the date for filing 

answers to CAISO’s March 6 Motion is 

shortened to and including March 13, 

2009. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–5777 Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. RM08–2–001] 

Pipeline Posting Requirements Under 

Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act; 

Notice of Agenda for Technical 

Conference 

March 11, 2009. 

On February 24, 2009, the 

Commission issued a Notice of 

Technical Conference (February 24 

Notice), to be held March 18, 2009, in 

the above referenced proceeding. The 

technical conference is being held by 

staff for the purpose of discussing 

certain issues raised in the requests for 

rehearing filed in response to Order No. 

720.1 As stated in the February 24 

Notice, the technical conference will be 

held at the headquarters of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC, from 

9 a.m. to 1 p.m. (EDT). 

Attached is an agenda for the March 

18, 2009, technical conference. The 

February 24 Notice identified three 

topics for discussion: (1) The definition 

of major non-interstate pipelines; (2) 

what constitutes ‘‘scheduling’’ for a 

receipt or delivery point; and, (3) how 

the 15,000 MMBtu per day design 

capacity threshold should be applied. 

As reflected in the attached agenda, 

Panel 1 will address the first topic, with 

a focus on contiguous and noncontiguous networks, stub lines and 

other gathering issues; Panel 2 will 

address the second and third topics, 

with a focus on how pipeline systems 

account for high capacity receipt and 

delivery points (i.e., greater than 15,000 

MMBtu per day) where scheduling does 

not occur; and, Panel 3 will focus on 

estimating the cost of compliance with 

Order No. 720. 

This conference will be transcribed. 

There is no registration required to 

attend and no registration fee. For 

additional information, please contact 

Saida Shaalan of FERC’s Office of 

Enforcement at (202) 502–8278 or by email at Saida.Shaalan@ferc.gov. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

Agenda for Technical Conference 

Order No. 720 Rehearing Issues 

Technical Conference RM08–02–001 

March 18, 2009 

Commission Meeting Room 

9–9:10 a.m.—Opening Remarks 

9:10–9:50 a.m.—Defining Major NonInterstate Pipelines 

Assessing contiguous and noncontiguous networks 

—What constitutes a contiguous 

pipeline system for the purpose of 

applying the annual 50 million 

MMBtu delivery threshold? 

—What are the market differences 

between non-contiguous pipeline 

systems with the same owner and a 

single pipeline system? 

Stub lines and other gathering issues 

—What role do stub lines play in the 

market? How are they operated? 

—What gathering functions do not occur 

upstream of a processing plant? How 

widespread are those activities (e.g., 

volumes)? 

Panelists: 

Representative from TPA 

Representative from Southwest Gas 

Representative from AGA 

9:50 a.m.–12 p.m.—Accounting for High 

Capacity Receipt and Delivery 

Points (i.e., Greater than 15,000 

MMBtu Per Day) Where Scheduling 

Does Not Occur 

Is there some rule of thumb to identify 

points at which advance notice of 

receipts/deliveries is required for 

operational purposes? 

How do companies without 

scheduling information address the 

risk of demand volatility from large 

scale consumers receiving 

unbundled service? 

How do pipelines reconcile 

nominations with actual flows at 

pooled points? 

Panelists: 

Representative from TPA 

Representative from SoCal Gas 

Representative from Nicor 

Representative from AGA 

12:10–12:50 p.m.—Estimating the Cost 

of Compliance 

What is the basis for cost estimates in 

the rehearing requests? 

Are there alternative approaches that 


tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES