alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7559

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KRISTEN PATRICK DOYLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cr-00039-RBS-TEM-1; 2:17-

cv-00567-RBS)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kristen Patrick Doyle, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kristen Patrick Doyle appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.

*

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3006A (2012), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Doyle, No. 2:12-cr-00039-RBS-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court construed Doyle’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as an 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion.
EXHIBIT 32


                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


PACIFIC STATE BANCORP


Date: November 14, 2003                BY: /s/ STEVEN A. ROSSO
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Steven A. Rosso
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Acting Chief Financial Officer


                                       18
Joseph WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105452

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: September 4, 2018

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Alexandria A. Shah, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

*127Joseph Wilson ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following a hearing. We find no error and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 2920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-946]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6874]

In the Matter of the Designation of al-Qa'ida in the Arabian 
Peninsula (AQAP), Also Known as al-Qa'ida of Jihad Organization in the 
Arabian Peninsula, Also Known as Tanzim Qa'idat al-Jihad fi Jazirat al-
Arab, Also Known as al-Qa'ida Organization in the Arabian Peninsula 
(AQAP), Also Known as al-Qa'ida in Yemen (AQY), Also Known as al-Qa'ida 
in the South Arabian Peninsula as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the organization known as al-Qa'ida in 
the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and also known as al-Qa'ida of Jihad 
Organization in the Arabian Peninsula, also known as Tanzim Qa'idat al-
Jihad fi Jazirat al-Arab, also known as al-Qa'ida Organization in the 
Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), also known as al-Qa'ida in Yemen (AQY), also 
known as al-Qa'ida in the South Arabian Peninsula committed, or poses a 
significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the 
security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or 
economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 14, 2009.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-946 Filed 1-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Exhibit 32.0

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his
capacity as an officer of Banc of California, Inc. (the Company) that this Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
financial statements included in such report.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 18, 2014 |  | By: |  | /S/ STEVEN A.
SUGARMAN                           
|                      |  |     |  | Steven A. Sugarman                               
|                      |  |     |  | President/ Chief Executive Officer               
|                      |  |    
|Date: August 18, 2014 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.                       
|                      |  |     |  | Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.                           
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Vice President/ Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  |    
|Date: August 18, 2014 |  | By: |  | /s/ Nathan Duda                                  
|                      |  |     |  | Nathan Duda                                      
|                      |  |     |  | Senior Vice President/ Chief Accounting Officer
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield Futures Fund L.P.(the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector     Date: August 14,2006

----
1 

### Koprowski, Paul

From: MOODY Christine M [Christine.Moody@co.lane.or.us]

Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 8:59 AM

To: Koprowski, Paul

Cc: SUN Jeanne

Subject: RE: Request for budget information

Paul, Jeanne forwarded your request on LRAPA funding to me. The following amounts have, or are planned to, be paid

to LRAPA from the County for the years you requested:

2010

‐ 11 $117,820

2011

‐ 12 $0

2012

‐ 13 $42,200 (in kind contributions)

I should point out that the decline in funding from Lane County has been about the decline in federal timber funds

– not

the recession.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Thank you,

lane county:

w o rking

for you



### Christine Moody

Budget & Financial Planning Manager

Budget & Financial Planning

Lane County, Eugene, Oregon

(541) 682-3766 phone

(541) 682-4616 fax

Christine.Moody@co.lane.or.us

STAY INFORMED about Lane County's budget on:

Facebook www.Facebook/LaneCountyBudget

Twitter @CMoodyLC H ashtag: #lcbudget

Nuture your mind with great thoughts, for you will never go any higher than you think

~ Benjamin Disraeli

From: Koprowski, Paul [ mailto:Koprowski.Paul@epa.gov ]

Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 3:49 PM

To: SUN Jeanne

Subject: Request for budget information

Hi Jeanne,

Thank you for returning my call from last week. I hope you had a good vacation.

I am trying to understand how the recession has impacted the counties c ontribution to Lane Regional Air Protection Agency.2 If you could provide me with detail on the amount of funding the county provided to LRAPA between 2010 and 2013 I would really

appreciate it.

Thanks much,

Paul

Paul Koprowski

U.S. EPA; Oregon Operations Office

805 SW Broadway, Suite 500

Portland, Oregon 97205

(503) 326-6363
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hakim Hussain Abdul, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 5]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), rendered March 2, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion for preclusion, made on the ground of lack of notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 (1) (a), of his statement to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel in which he declined medical treatment. There is no evidence that the EMS workers acted as police agents *(see, People v Esmail,*260 AD2d 396, *lv denied*93 NY2d 970; *see also, People v Batista,*277 AD2d 141). Moreover, the inquiry as to whether defendant needed medical aid was not interrogation.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard P. Kundrat,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of NuVim,  Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of NuVim,  Inc. for the
period ended June 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Richard P. Kundrat
-----------------------------
Richard P. Kundrat, President
and Chief Executive Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUCIO REYES MAZON,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70562

Agency No. A091-780-709

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Lucio Reyes Mazon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for

cancellation of removal and adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under

FILED

SEP 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70562

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

determinations, Hernandez v. Mukasey, 345 F.3d 824, 843 (9th Cir. 2003) and we

review de novo due process claims, Cano Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th

Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.

We agree that Reyes Mazon has not met his burden to establish that he was

the beneficiary of an approved visa petition; a requirement for his application for

adjustment of status to proceed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i)(B); cf. Hernandez, 345

F.3d at 843. 

Contrary to Reyes Mazon’s contention, the BIA properly concluded that the

IJ did not violate due process by not informing Reyes Mazon of his eligibility for a

Section 212(h) waiver, because the waiver was not applicable to the ground of

inadmissibility with which Reyes Mazon was charged. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h);

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (holding petitioner must

demonstrate error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim). 

Reyes Mazon does not challenge the agency’s conclusion that he is

statutorily ineligible to show good moral character so that contention is waived. 

See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
April 29, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIE EUGENE PEARSO N , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00277

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: LUIS RAMOS §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00070

- CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20160D002189)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings, in accordance

with the opinion of this Court. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the quarterly report of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended July 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter A. Edison, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 ofthe United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: September 12, 2006 /s/  Peter A. Edison    Peter A. Edison    Chairman of the Board and
CHARLESTON.

#### Riley Varney *v.*County Court of Mingo County *et al.*

(No. 5840)

Submitted October 5, 1926.

Decided October 12, 1926.

1. Elections—

A county court sitting as a canvassing board, has no authority to pass on the eligibility of candidates, (p. 326.) (Elections, 20 C. J. § 120 [Anno].)

2. *Same*— Failure *of Candidate Receiving Highest Number of Votes in Primary Election to File Expense Account is Not Excuse for Refusal of Canvassing Board to Issue Certificate of Nomination (Code, c. 5,*§§ *8b*[6], *8b*[SIR

The fact that a candidate receiving the highest number of votes in a primary election has failed to file an expense account as prescribed by Secs. 8-b (p), and 8-b (8), Ch. 5, Code, is no excuse for the refusal of a canvassing board to issue him a certificate of nomination, (p. 326.)

(Elections, 20 C. J. § 120 [Anno].)

(Note : Parenthetical references by Editors, C. J. — Cyc. Not part of Syllabi.)

Original proceeding by Riley Varney, as relator, for mandamus to be directed to the County Court of Mingo County and others.

*Writ awarded.*

*E. A. Eansbarger*for relator.

*George W. Crawford*for respondents.

*326Hatcher, Judge :

In the primary election on Aug. 3, 1926, Kiley Varney the petitioner, received a majority of 212 votes over his only opponent, S. J. Lovern, for the Democratic nomination for clerk of the county court of Mi-ngo county. The county court, sitting as canvassing board, declared'Varney not to be a legal nominee, and issued to Lovern a certificate of nomination. The county court, in answer to an alternative writ of mandamus, seeks' to justify its action on the ground that Varney filed no expense account within the time prescribed by Secs.-8-b, (6), and 8-b, (8), Ch. 5, Code.

This is not a sufficient reason for refusing to issue Var-ney a certificate of nomination. The duties of the county court as a canvassing board are detailed in Secs. 68, 69, 70, and 71, Ch. 3, Code. These duties are ministerial, not judicial. It is not within the province of a canvassing board to pass on the eligibility of a candidate. *State*v. *Heatherly*(recently decided by this court). Its duty is to ascertain carefully and impartially the true result of the election, and to issue certificates in accordance with that result. *Brazie*v. *Commissioners, 25 W.*Va. 213 (221).

The return does not state a legal defense to the alternative writ. The peremptory writ is awarded. .

*Writ awarded.*
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report  of NuVim, Inc. (the "Company") on  Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, Richard
P.  Kundrat, President,  and Chief  Executive Officer  of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 2. The  information contained  in the  Report fairly  presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.

Date: May 15, 2008

/s/ Richard P. Kundrat
Chief Executive Officer

                                       35