alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Amendment 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit (10)(xiii)(1) 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION

 1997 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE 
 DIRECTORS 
 WHEREAS, Northern Trust Corporation
(the “Corporation”) sponsors the Northern Trust Corporation 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008 (the “Plan’); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has elected an advisory director to the Board and wishes to amend the Plan to
clarify that advisory directors shall be eligible to defer compensation under the Plan; 
 NOW THEREFORE, in exercise of
the amending power reserved to the Corporation under Section 6(a) of the Plan, the Plan is amended as follows, effective October 20, 2009: 
 1. Section 2(h) is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following new Section 2(h) is substituted therefor: 
 “(h) the term “Non-Employee Director” shall mean a person who is serving as a member of the Board and is not an employee of the Corporation or any subsidiary or affiliate of the
Corporation. The term “Non-Employee Director” shall also include a person who is serving as an advisory director, pursuant to appointment, and designation as such, by the Board, and who is not an employee of the Corporation or any
subsidiary or affiliate of the Corporation. References to “Non-Employee Director” and “Director” throughout the Plan shall include all individuals described in the preceding two sentences.” 
 2. The following sentence is hereby added at the end of the first paragraph of Section 3(a): 
 “Except as otherwise provided in the following paragraph, a Non-Employee Director shall not be eligible under this Plan to defer all or
any portion of his compensation paid in the form of an award designated as an award of “stock units,” even if such award is to be distributed exclusively in cash.” 
 In all other respects, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this amendment to be executed on its behalf on this 20th day of October 2009.

  

			
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Timothy P. Moen

	Name:	 	Timothy P. Moen
	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President and Head of
 Human Resources and Administration
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 10215 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Martin Viveros,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 426

- 10

Before **Jones, Clement,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Martin Viveros has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Viveros has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 28, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-10215 Document: 00515916425 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2021No. 20

- 10215

2 relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
**GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 20-10215 Document: 00515916425 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2021
**Exhibit 15.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-81825 and 333-149634 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-168347 on Form F-3 of Vodafone Group Plc of our report dated February 24, 2012 (May 10, 2012 as to Note 2) relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Vodafone Group Plc for the year ended March 31, 2012. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

New York, New York 

May 31, 2012
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of BioMedical Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Donald G. Cox, Chief Executive Officer/President and David A. Kempf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/ Donald G. Cox________ Donald G. Cox Chief Executive Officer/President May 13, 2010   __/s/David A. Kempf________ David A. Kempf Chief Financial Officer May 13, 2010
**Exhibit 10.3**GUARANTY**     This GUARANTY is made as of September 26, 2005 by NOBLE CORPORATION, a Cayman Islands exemptedcompany limited by shares (the “Company”), for the benefit of Bruce W. Busmire (the “Executive”);WITNESSETH:     WHEREAS, Noble Drilling Corporation, a Delaware corporation and an indirect, wholly ownedsubsidiary of the Company (“Noble-Delaware”), has entered into an Employment Agreement with theExecutive dated as of the date hereof (the “Employment Agreement”); and     WHEREAS, the Company desires to guarantee the performance by Noble-Delaware of its obligationsunder the Employment Agreement, and the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it isreasonable and prudent for the Company to deliver this Guaranty and necessary to promote and ensurethe best interests of the Company and its Members;     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the Company hereby irrevocably andunconditionally guarantees, as primary obligor, the due and punctual performance by Noble-Delawareof its agreements and obligations, all and singular, under the Employment Agreement. This Guarantyshall survive any liquidation of Noble-Delaware or any of its subsidiaries. This Guaranty shall begoverned by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.     The obligations of the Company hereunder shall be absolute and unconditional and shall remainin full force and effect until the termination of the Employment Agreement or the completeperformance by Noble-Delaware of its obligations thereunder, irrespective of the validity,regularity or enforceability of the Employment Agreement, any change or amendment thereto, theabsence of any action to enforce the same, any waiver or consent by the Executive or Noble-Delawarewith respect to any provision of the Employment Agreement, the recovery of any judgment againstNoble-Delaware or any action to enforce the same, or any other circumstances that may otherwiseconstitute a legal or equitable discharge or defense of the Company. The Company waives any rightof set-off or counterclaim it may have against the Executive arising from any other obligations theExecutive may have to Noble-Delaware or the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf by itsduly authorized officer as of the date first above set forth.       NOBLE CORPORATION            By:      /s/ Julie J. Robertson       Name:      Julie J. Robertson       Title:      Senior Vice President — Administration     
1**
IN the INTEREST OF: T.M.M. and T.B., Plaintiffs,

Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. T.B. (Father), Appellant.

WD 80951

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: April 17, 2018

Daniel G. Barry, for Respondent.

Edward E. Moore, Kansas City, Co-counsel for Respondent.

Kelley Gilmore, for Appellant.

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Father appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court terminating his parental rights to his two sons. He complains on appeal that the trial court erred in finding grounds for termination of parental rights as well as finding that such termination was in his sons' best interests. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Tony G. Holcombe, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Companies, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompanies. 

Date: May 12, 2008 

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
exv10w98






Exhibit 10.98




First Amendment to the DSH #2 Building Lease Agreement



This First Amendment to the DSH #2 Building Lease Agreement (the “First Amendment”) is made
and effective as of December 31, 2009, by and between SHANGHAI KAI HONG TECHNOLOGY
ELECTRONIC CO., LTD. (“DSH”) and SHANGHAI YUAN HOWE ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. (“Yuan Howe”). DSH and
Yuan Howe are collectively referred to as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”.




     In consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this First Amendment, the Parties agree
as follows:



1. Definitions



Unless otherwise defined in this First Amendment, the terms used in this First Amendment shall have
the meaning and definition as stated in the DSH #2 Building Lease Agreement (the “Agreement”).




2. The Extent of the Amendment



Except for those terms and conditions as specifically stated for amendment in this First Amendment,
all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue to be valid and
effective.




3. Lease Period Amendment



Both Parties agree to retroactively amend Sections 4.3.2. and 4.3.3. of the Agreement concerning
DSH’s planned lease schedule of the DSH #2 Building as follows:





4.3.2. Starting November 15, 2009, DSH shall begin the actual usage of DSH #2
Building floor 1B of approximately 3,155 square meters (the portion of the 4.90
square meters floor height), and starting December 1, 2009, DSH shall begin the
actual usage of DSH #2 Building floor 3 of approximately 6,272 square meters.




4.3.3. Except as stated in Section 4.3.4. of the Agreement, concerning all other
portions of the DSH #2 Building that are not currently in actual use by DSH, DSH
agrees to begin actually use the entire area of the DSH #2 Building by December
1, 2011.



4. Monthly Lease Fee



The monthly lease fee for DSH #2 Building floor 1B and floor 3 shall be calculated in accordance
with the monthly lease per square meter price as specified in the Section 6 of the Agreement.







 









 








5. Effective Date of the First Amendment



This First Amendment shall become effective after the legal representatives or authorized
representatives of both Parties affix their signatures and company seals on this First Amendment.




6. Language of the First Amendment



This First Amendment is made and executed in both Chinese and English, both versions are equally
valid and effective except as otherwise prohibited under the law.




7. Complete Understanding



This First Amendment comprises the entire understanding between the Parties with respect to its
subject matters and supersedes any previous or contemporaneous communications, representations, or
agreements, whether oral or written. For purposes of construction, this First Amendment will be
deemed to have been drafted by both Parties. No modification of this First Amendment will be
binding on either Party unless in writing and signed by an authorized representative of each Party.




	 	 	 
	Party A: Shanghai Kai Hong


	 	Party B: Shanghai Yuan Howe Electronic

	Technology Co., Ltd.


	 	Co., Ltd.

	 

	 	 

	Representative:


	 	Representative:

	 

	 	 

	Date:


	 	Date:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

                    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a planning meeting and briefing meeting of the Vermont Advisory Committee will convene at 11 a.m. on Tuesday, March 31, 2009, at the                           ( print page 11080)                        University of Vermont, Trinity College Campus, Farrell Hall, 210 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, Vermont. The purpose of the planning meeting is to review the draft report on racial profiling in Vermont and plan future activities. The purpose of the briefing meeting is to hear about sentencing disparities in the Vermont judicial system.                 

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Eastern Regional Office, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, present their comments at the meeting, or who desire additional information should contact Alfreda Greene, Secretary, at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to:                     *ero@usccr.gov*.                 

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.usccr.gov*, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA. 

Dated in Washington, DC, March 11, 2009. 

Christopher Byrnes, 

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. E9-5658 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Charter Campbell L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of
Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.









By:  /s/Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation,
        the general partner of the Partnership

Date:	   November 13, 2008
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5646 

To study and promote the use of energy efficient computer servers in the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2006 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To study and promote the use of energy efficient computer 

servers in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY. 

4 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Pro6 tection Agency, through the Energy Star program, shall 

7 transmit to the Congress the results of a study analyzing 

8 the rapid growth and energy consumption of computer 

9 data centers by the Federal Government and private en10 terprise. The study shall include— 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5646 IH

1 (1) an overview of the growth trends associated 

2 with data centers and the utilization of servers in 

3 the Federal Government and private sector; 

4 (2) analysis of the industry migration to the use 

5 of energy efficient microchips and servers designed 

6 to provide energy efficient computing and reduce the 

7 costs associated with constructing, operating, and 

8 maintaining large and medium scale data centers; 

9 (3) analysis of the potential cost savings to the 

10 Federal Government, large institutional data center 

11 operators, private enterprise, and consumers avail12 able through the adoption of energy efficient data 

13 centers and servers; 

14 (4) analysis of the potential cost savings and 

15 benefits to the energy supply chain through the 

16 adoption of energy efficient data centers and servers, 

17 including reduced demand, enhanced capacity, and 

18 reduced strain on existing grid infrastructure, and 

19 consideration of secondary benefits, including poten20 tial impact of related advantages associated with 

21 substantial domestic energy savings; 

22 (5) an overview of current government incen23 tives offered for energy efficient products and serv24 ices and consideration of similar incentives to enVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:24 Jun 21, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5646.IH H5646

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5646 IH

1 courage the adoption of energy efficient data centers 

2 and servers; and 

3 (6) recommendations regarding potential incen4 tives and voluntary programs that could be used to 

5 advance the adoption of energy efficient data centers 

6 and computing. 

7 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

8 It is the sense of Congress that it is in the best inter9 est of the United States for purchasers of computer serv10 ers to give high priority to energy efficiency as a factor 

11 in determining best value and performance for purchases 

12 of computer servers. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Vivian Lam, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. on the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oxford Technologies, Inc.







|                   |  |     |  |                                                              
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |     |  |                                                              
|Date: May 18, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Vivian Lam                                               
|                   |  |     |  | Vivian Lam, President                                        
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Wed May 13 14:02:47 EDT 2015 Yuhas.Darlene@epamail.epa.gov FW: NACWA Concerns with Region 10 Actions in Washington To: CMS.OEX@epamail.epa.gov; Gaines.Cynthia@epamail.epa.gov

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

For CMS, please. thank you

From: Chris Hornback [mailto:CHornback@nacwa.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 12:41 PM To: McLerran, Dennis Cc: Mccarthy, Gina; Kopocis, Ken; maia.bellon@ecy.wa.gov; robert.duff@gov.wa.gov; Opalski, Dan Subject: NACWA Concerns with Region 10 Actions in Washington

Administrator McLerran,

Attached is a letter outlining several concerns with your office’s March 23, 2015, letter to the Washington Department of Ecology on its proposed human health criteria and implementation provisions.

Please contact me with any questions.

Chris Hornback | Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs | National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA)

(O) 202/833-9106 | (M) 703/798-5714 | chornback@nacwa.org
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-21054 Summary Calendar
MONICA LORTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS CHRISTUS ST JOHN HOSPITAL; ET AL, Defendants, CHRISTUS ST. JOHN HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-99-CV-1876) July 17, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.