alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

I, Edwin M. Golstein,  Chief Financial Officer of Dairene  International certify
that:

1.  I  have   reviewed  this   quarterly   report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Dairene
International;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which  this  quarterly  report is being  prepared;  b)  evaluated  the
effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and
presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this
report, based on such evaluation;  and c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize and report financial information;  and b) any fraud, whether
or not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have a
significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 30, 2004
                                  /s/ Edwin M. Golstein /s/
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Edwin M. Golstein, Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10215

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Martin Viveros, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-426-10

Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Martin Viveros has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Viveros has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 28, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10215 Document: 00515916425 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2021
No. 20-10215

2

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-10215 Document: 00515916425 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2021
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conscious Intention, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Sylva Leduc, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge,  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




/s/ Sylva Leduc
-------------------
Sylva Leduc
Chief Executive Officer
Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: August 16, 2004
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 The
        undersigned, Wilson Cheng, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
        of
        Directors and Treasurer of BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC. (the "Company"), DOES
        HEREBY CERTIFY that:
 
 1.
        The
        Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007
        (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
        23 rd day of July ,
        2007.
 
 /s/ **Wilson
                Cheng**Wilson
                  Cheng
                  CEO,
                    Chairman of the Board of Directors and
                    Treasurer
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC. and will be retained by BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS
        INC.
        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
Scott BOERGERT, Appellant, v. KELLY SERVICES, INC., Respondent.

WD 81113

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 17, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 28, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 4, 2018.

Charles Brown, Gower, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Jayson Watkins, Gower, MO, Co-Counsel for Appellant.

Francis Neuner, Jr., St. Louis, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Brian Peterson, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent.

Joseph Bednar, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent.

Aaron Buckley, San Diego, CA, Co-Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Edward R. Ardini, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Scott Boergert appeals a Cole County Circuit Court judgment dismissing with prejudice his petition seeking damages for violations of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and class certification. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Tatum Chauca, Respondent, v Boris Chauca, Appellant, and Federico Cruces, Defendant.

[772 NYS2d 603]

In an action, inter alia, for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Spolzino, J.), dated April 10, 2003, which, among other things, awarded pendente lite child support and maintenance and directed him to pay the carrying charges on the marital residence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

“Modifications of pendente lite maintenance and child sup*422port should rarely be made by an appellate court, and then only under exigent circumstances, such as when a party is unable to meet his or her financial obligations, or when justice otherwise requires” *(Verderame v Verderame,*247 AD2d 609 [1998]; *see Aliano v Aliano,*285 AD2d 522 [2001]). The husband did not demonstrate that the pendente lite award left him unable to meet his own financial obligations *(see Pezza v Pezza,*300 AD2d 555 [2002]; *Grant v Grant,*299 AD2d 521, 522 [2002]; *Aliano v Aliano, supra).*Any inequities perceived by the husband can best be remedied by a speedy trial *(see Verderame v Verderame, supra; Weinberg v Weinberg,*247 AD2d 535, 536 [1998]; *Shipman v Shipman,*237 AD2d 426, 427 [1997]; *Pascale v Pascale,*226 AD2d 439, 440 [1996]).

The husband’s remaining contention is without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of TierOne Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
          quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  September 26, 2002           /s/ Gilbert G. Lundstrom
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Gilbert G. Lundstrom
                                    Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                     Executive Officer











                                   29
#### Walter G. Mathes, *Appellant,*v. E. A. Roberts, *Appellee.*

Division A.

Decision Filed April 30, 1928.

*Bart A. Riley, James M. Carson*and *M. H. Rosenhouse,*of Miami, for Appellant.

*Gilbert C. Robinson, Burwell & Shipp,*and *Shipp,'Evans*<£• *Kline,*of Miami, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said degree. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Meador, Appellant.

[718 NYS2d 351]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered July 9, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

*328The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The circumstantial evidence warranted the conclusion that the credit card constituted stolen property in that it had been stolen either by common-law trespassory taking or by acquiring lost property, as defined in Penal Law § 155.05 (2) (b) *(see, People v Colon,*28 NY2d 1, 11, *cert denied*402 US 905). Moreover, the evidence excluded any reasonable possibility that the credit card did not constitute stolen property under one or the other of those definitions. The evidence also permitted the jury to reasonably infer, through the use of common sense, that defendant knew the credit card was stolen and intended to benefit himself or to impede the owner’s recovery of the credit card *(see, People v Cintron,*95 NY2d 329).

The court’s instruction to the jury that stolen property could include property stolen by acquisition of lost property as defined by law did not constructively amend the indictment. The instruction was consistent with the indictment, which did not specify the manner in which the credit card was stolen *(see, People v Rivera,*84 NY2d 766; *People v Ransdell,*254 AD2d 63, *lv denied*92 NY2d 1037; *People v Roberts,*204 AD2d 974, *lv denied*84 NY2d 871).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         167,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  412,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               594,515
<PP&E>                                       2,581,074
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,302,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,647,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          990,092
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,278
<OTHER-SE>                                     641,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,647,482
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,908,182
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,206,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,313,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (40,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,487,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,487,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,487,226)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CHARLESTON.

#### Cipher *v.*Bowen *et al.*

Submitted June 17, 1904

Decided November 15, 1904.

1. *Appeal*— Decree—Bill.

An appeal from a decree on a bill taken for confessed will not be entertained by this Court, unless a motion to have such, decree reversed be first made and overruled by the court, or ; the judge thereof, that rendered it. (p. 184).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pleasants County.

Bill by India Cipher against J. H. Bowen and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

*'Dismissed.*

S. M. Noyes, for appellants.

C. P. Ceaig, for appellee.

*184Miller.., Judge :

India Cipher, plaintiff below, instituted ber suit and filed 'her bill in the circuit court of Pleasants county against J. H. Bowen, George W. Wentz, John Schauwecker, B. F. Biggs, J. B. Parker, Bobert M. Clendenning, Lora M. Clendenning, George W. Brown, Laura Brown, Susan Taggart, Bosa Welty ¡and C. W. Welty and F. P. Wingerter, executors of the last will and testament of Peter Welty, deceased, in which bill the plaintiff claimed dower in lot No. 12 in'the town of St. Marys.

The bill was filed at October rules, 1901, and decree *nisi.*"taken thereon. At November rules, following, the decree *nisi*was confirmed, and the cause was set for hearing.

On the 10th day of June, 1903, the following decree was made and entered by the court:

> “This cause came on this day to be heard on the bill and exhibits filed, and summons *havemg*been accepted by J. B. Parker •and been duly served on all the other defendants and none of the defendants appearing by pleadings or otherwise and the cause having been submitted for final decree and it appearing that the plaintiff elects to- accept her dower in gross sum, and it further .•appearing that the value of the property described in these proceedings was of the value of $2,000.00 at the time of tire alienation and that the ago of the said India Cipher at the time of the death of A. P. Biggs, her husband, was-forty-seven.years, and that there is now due her as her dower in said property in gross sum the sum of $393.84. It is therefore adjudged, ordered and decreed that the said India Cipher do recover of the defendants in this cause the same sum of $393.84 and her costs in her behalf expended. * *

From this decree Bosa Welty and C. W. Welty and F. P. Wingerter, executors of Peter Welty, were allowed an appeal.

The above is a decree on a bill taken for confessed. No motion has been made in the said circuit court, or before the judge thereof in vacation to have it reversed.

Under section 6 of chapter 134 of the Code, the appeal was improvident^ granted and must therefore be dismissed. *Watson*v. Wigginton, 28 W. Va. 533; *Miller*v. *Aracoma,*30 W. Va. 606; *Ferguson*v. *Millender.*32 W. Va. 30.

*Dismissed.*
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34

Exhibit 10.34   Employment Agreement Between the Company and
Donald C. Swanson Dated May 5, 1997.



May 1, 1997

Donald C. Swanson
6736 E. Waterton Ave.
Orange, CA  92867

Dear Don:

On behalf of AMDL, Inc. we are pleased to offer you the position of Director,
Manufacturing, reporting to the Vice President of Operations.  In this capacity,
functions reporting to you will include raw materials/production planning,
reagent production, labeling, vialing and kit assembly.  Although our current
manufacturing organizational structure is still being finalized, you will
initially have three positions reporting directly to you.

With respect to compensation, your annual salary will be $70,000 per year,
including the following benefits:

     .  Paid Employee Group Medical Insurance (effective after 90 days)

     .  Vacation time accrued at the rate of:
        1st through 3rd year; 1 day per month not to exceed 10 days.
        4th and 5th year; 11/2 days per month not to exceed 15 days.

     .  Stock Options for 50,000 shares of AMDL common stock; vesting in eight
        equal installments at the close of each 3 month period of the 1st two
        years of continuous employment; having a strike price equal to the
        closing bid price on May 1, 1997; and having a term of 3 years from the
        date of vesting. These options will be offered under a plan 01 on other
        terms to be approved by AMDL's Board of Directors.

     .  If AMDL in its sole discretion (other than for conduct amounting to
        fraud, dishonesty or acts of moral turpitude; behavior inimical to the
        interests of the AMDL; or any acts or omissions to act which are
        determined by the Board of Directors to constitute gross negligence or
        flagrant misconduct) terminates this employment relationship during the
        1st year of its term, AMDL shall pay a severance amount equal to two
        months salary.

We are all convinced that you could make a significant and key contribution to
AMDL's business strategy, particularly in the areas of quality assurance and GMP
compliance.  We look forward to your joining the AMDL management team on May 5,
1997.

Best wishes,


--------------------------
Ronald J. Moore, Ph.D.
Vice President, Operations


Agreed to and accepted by:


---------------------------        --------------
Donald C. Swanson                       Date

                                      32
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2009



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. Mewbourne Chief Executive
Officer Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General
Partner of the Registrant
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of EAU Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian
D. Heinhold, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





DATE:
November 16, 2009





/s/ Brian D. HeinholdBrian
      D. HeinholdChief
      Financial OfficerEAU
      Technologies, Inc.
**Exhibit 99.5**

 

Certification of CEO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

* *

*I certify that this periodic reportcontaining the issuer’s financial statements fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this periodicreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the issuer.*

 
|   | *By: /s/ Keith C. Robbins*           |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                 |
|   | *President, Chief Executive Officer* |
|   |                                 |
|   | *Date:  May 9, 2003*            |

 

 

----