alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5503 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5503

   To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount 
  limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing 
                      located in high-cost areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2006

    Mr. Gary G. Miller of California (for himself and Mr. Frank of 
Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount 
  limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing 
                      located in high-cost areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Multifamily Loan Limit 
Adjustment Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE LIMITS IN HIGH COST AREAS.

    The National Housing Act is amended--
            (1) in sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 
        221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 231(c)(2)(B), and 
        234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 
        1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B) and 
        1715y(e)(3)(B))--
                    (A) by striking ``140 percent'' each place such 
                term appears and inserting `` 170 percent''; and
                    (B) by striking ``170 percent in high cost areas'' 
                each time place such term appears and inserting ``215 
                percent in high cost areas''; and
            (2) in section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III) (12 U.S.C. 
        1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III)) by striking ``206A'' and all that 
        follows through ``project-by-project basis'' and inserting the 
        following: ``206A of this Act) by not to exceed 170 percent in 
        any geographical area where the Secretary finds that cost 
        levels so require and by not to exceed 170 percent, or 215 
        percent in high cost areas, where the Secretary determines it 
        necessary on a project-by-project basis''.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 29751-5-II.

Division Two.

June 8, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. James Edward Mitchell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 02-1-02948-7, Brian M. Tollefson, J., entered December 12, 2002. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Quinn-Brintnall, C.J.; Armstrong, J, concurring separately.
|   | (1)     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |   |                         |   |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| DATE:      August 13, 2009 |        | /s/      Wade R. Bradley     |   |
|                       |   | Wade      R. Bradley         |   |
|                       |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                       |   | EAU      Technologies, Inc.  |   |

----
Crossroads Liquidating Trust 10-K

 

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Trustee**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of Crossroads Liquidating Trust, the undersigned Trustees of Crossroads Liquidating Trust, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Crossroads Liquidating Trust.

 

| May 15, 2020 |   | /s/ Andrew Dakos                   |
|--------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| Date         |   | Andrew DakosTrustee

         |
| May 15, 2020 |   | /s/ Phillip Goldstein              |
| Date         |   | Phillip Goldstein

Trustee

  |
| May 15, 2020 |   | /s/ Gerald Hellerman               |
| Date         |   | Gerald Hellerman

Trustee          |
The U.S. EPA HRS vapor intrusion addition webpage is located at:

http://www.epa.gov/superfund/hrs-subsurface-intrusion
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Jacinta Sit, President of Oxford Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







|                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|By: /s/ Jacinta Sit                                           | 
|Jacinta Sit, President                                        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) | 
|                                                              | 
|August 14, 2008                                               |
#### In the Matter of Carlos S., Appellant. Oneida County Attorney, Petitioner-Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 653]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County *1052(Bernadette T. Romano, J.), entered January 2, 2003. The order adjudged that respondent is a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for one year.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order of disposition that adjudged him a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for one year. Contrary to the contention of respondent, Family Court did not assume a prosecutorial role in the proceedings, in violation of his due process rights. Rather, the court fulfilled its “vital role in clarifying confusing testimony and facilitating the orderly and expeditious progress of the trial” *(People v Yut Wai Tom,*53 NY2d 44, 57 [1981]). Present— Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
Cory LENZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106087

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

December 4, 2018

Maleaner R. Harvey, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Cory Lenz ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Rotork
Authorization Letter

    


    Rotork
hereby appoints and presents this certificate to Hua Shen Trading
(International) Co., Ltd. as Rotork authorized distributor.


    


    Seal:
_____________________
CERTIFICATION



I, David J.Gallagher, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for 2004 of QSound Labs, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the company and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.









/s/ David J. Gallagher



David J. Gallagher

President and Chief Executive Officer





March 21, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned  hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the  quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June
     30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.



Date:  August 14, 2003


                                        /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                        -------------------------
                                        Michelle A. Alexander
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2013-0623

Directorate Identifier: 2013NM109AD

AFM CSP A-012, R61 --- 4/2/13

AFM CSP B-012, R11 --- 2/14/13

AFM CSP C-012, R7 --- 2/14/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS


Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCPW-15-0000010 

10-FEB-2015 

01:34 PM 

SCPW-15-0000010
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

LANRIC HYLAND, Petitioner,
 

vs.
 

DEE TORRES, Secretary to the Board of Registration;


PHILLIP MATLAGE, Chair of the Board of Registration;


STEWART MAEDA, Hawaii County Clerk; and VALRI KUNIMOTO,


Deputy Attorney General, Respondents.
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

(CAAP-15-0000053)
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of Petitioner Lanric Hyland’s 

petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on January 7, 2015, the 

documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and 

the record, it appears that Petitioner has filed an appeal from 

the Board of Registration’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, 

and Order Dismissing Appeals with the Intermediate Court of 

Appeals, docketed as CAAP-15-0000053, and may seek relief in the 

appeal. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to a writ of 

mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 
334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy
 

that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear
 

and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means
 

to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested
 

action). Accordingly, 


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
 

mandamus is denied without prejudice to Petitioner raising the
 

arguments presented in the instant petition, as appropriate, in
 

CAAP-15-0000053. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 10, 2015. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
 

2
Zachary M. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106103

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: January 15, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Julia E. Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

Zachary Carter ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 24.035 motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

All rule citations are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2016) unless otherwise indicated.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**J. ROE BUCKLEY / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, J. Roe Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Report”) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section. 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2012 of Numbeer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Michael Allan English, President, Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Annual Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in this AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

Date: September 13, 2012

 

 

*/s/ Michael Allan English____*

Name: Michael Allan English

Title: President, Secretary/ Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1999, AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND
SUBSIDIARY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,853,489
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         495,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,390,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  9,428,297
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     85,717,097
<ALLOWANCE>                                    638,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             116,303,156
<DEPOSITS>                                 104,523,178
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,074,743
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,598,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             116,303,156
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,136,750
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              512,169
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               345,584
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,994,503
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,204,034
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,204,034
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,790,469
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   41,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,564,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,536
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,136
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    0.09
<LOANS-NON>                                    495,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    14,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,695,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               686,016
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  197,255
<RECOVERIES>                                   108,877
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              638,638
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           638,638
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
ex10-2.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10.2

     

    


     

    Mr. Ken
Liebscher

     

     

    February
23, 2010

     

     

     

    Lucky Boy
Silver Corp. (the “Company”)

    (formerly
Sierra Ventures, Inc.)

     

    Dear
Sirs:

     

    
      	
              Re:

            	
              Assignment
      Agreement

            
	 
      	
              Nevada
      BLM Claim and Lease Silver Mines

            


    

     

    Further
to a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) dated February 8, 2010, Ken
Liebscher (“Liebscher”) acquired 38 unpatented BLM claims including those known
as Silver Summit and Candelaria and 2 historic silver mine leases known as Lucky
Boy Silver Mine and the Black Butte Silver Mine (the “AG Properties”) from Monte
Cristo Projects LLC and Alan Chambers.

     

    In
consideration of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration acknowledged
received, Liebscher does hereby assign all of his right, title and interest in
the Letter Agreement and AG Properties to the Company.

     

    


    
      	
              Signed:

            	
              

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Ken
      Liebscher

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              LUCKY
      BOY SILVER CORP.

            
	 
	 
	
              Per:

            	
              

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Fortunato
      Villamagna, Secretary
!WACKER I 

W<Jcker Fln<JI Product: 

S.iliame rubber compoound in an 

uncured state, F>IUllided to 

customers for mol'di ne and 

curlng lnt:o finished articles at 

their production fadlltles 

~X)()( XI 

CONFiiDENTIAL 

Removal of empt~ 

containers lor recycling or 

lncl nerntlon 

egl 

Press,molding, cross-l n~ing 

and in~ into ..,lid 

,. el~t:o c silicone rubber 

I----E12----IIol ~rtldes 

~X)()( XI 

CONF!IOENTIAL 

Equipment cleaning 

operations, soiYent oc 

d eanin.g agents sent fo:r 

tee'/( I ing or InCineration 

eal 

Final Product' 

lln<:lustrial end-use al!tides, 

l----u",4----+l.. cable daddine. insulators. 

etc. 

Key: 

~X)(J(XI 

OONF!IOENTIAL 

()amount of new substance 

meg nt~g igible amount 

Note: During product rure the n<!'W' 

subst:ance wlll become:an 

inextrl"' ble part of the ~ nished 

elastcmenc a rticle:s. 

CON~ DENTIAL