alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1   FIRST CASH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. SUBSIDIARIES  Subsidiary NameCountry/State of
IncorporationPercentage
Owned
By RegistrantFamous Pawn, Inc.Maryland100%CashPlus CSO, Inc.Maryland100%CardPlus, Inc.Nevada100%One Iron Ventures, Inc.Illinois100%First Cash, S.A. de C.V.Mexico100%American Loan Employee Services, S.A. de C.V.Mexico100%First Cash, Ltd.Texas100%First Cash Corp.Delaware100%First Cash Management, LLCDelaware100%First Cash, Inc.Nevada100%Cash & Go, Ltd.Texas49.5%Cash & Go Management, LLCTexas50%First Cash Credit, Ltd.Texas100%First Cash Credit Management, LLCTexas100%FCFS MO, Inc.Missouri100%FCFS OK, Inc.Oklahoma100%FCFS SC, Inc.South Carolina100%SHAC, LLCArkansas100%King Pawn, Inc.Maryland100%King Pawn II, Inc.Maryland100%College Park Jewelers, Inc.Maryland100%Maryland Precious Metals, Inc.Maryland100%
Robert BADOCK, Respondent, v. R.P. LUMBER COMPANY, INC., Appellant.

No. ED 106040

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: June 12, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 16, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: James C. Leritz, 555 Washington Avenue, Suite 600, St. Louis, MO 63101, LERITZ & PLUNKERT P.C.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Candice Rose Burke, 11230 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Lake St. Louis, MO 63367, COYNE, CUNDIFF & HILLEMANN, P.C.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

*ORDER*

Per Curiam

R.P. Lumber Company, Inc. appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding Robert Badock entitled to permanent total disability benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts *99and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the amended Annual Report of Clean Coal Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C Section 1350, that, to the best of the officer’s knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Robin Eves


Robin Eves, Chief Executive and Financial Officer


September 29, 2011
Exhibit 32.1








PACIFIC STATE BANCORP





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company











Date: November 13, 2009


/S/ Rick D. Simas


Rick D. Simas


President and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00065-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G.-V., M.G.-V., D.G.-V., and E.G.-V., Children

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-PA-02802

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s termination order is 

AFFIRMED.

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Mother or appellant Father because 

both of them are indigent. 

SIGNED August 22, 2018.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

 1 The Honorable Michael E. Mery is the presiding judge of the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The 

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, retired, was sitting by assignment and signed the order of termination that is 

the subject of this appeal.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. DAR IO TEQUIDA-ESQUER , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10514

D.C . No. 4:13-c r-00857-JGZ M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Je nnife r G. Zipps, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2014 * * B e fore : LEAVY, GOULD, a n d B ER Z ON, C irc uit Judge s . Dario Te q

uida -Esque r a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a n d c ha lle nge s the 60-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for c onspira c y

to posse ss with intent to distribute m arijua na , in viola

t ion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 841(a )(1), (b)(1)(B )(vii), a nd 846; a nd posse ssion with inte

nt to distribute 

# FIL ED OCT 20 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).m arijua

na , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 841(a)(1) an d (b)(1)(B )(vii). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . Te quida -Esque r c onte nds tha t the distric t c ourt e rre d

by im p osing the m andatory

m inim um se nte nc e ba se d in pa

rt on its finding tha

t Te quida -Esque r posse s se d a

fire arm in c onne c tion with his offe nse and wa s, the re fore , ine ligibleto be se nte nc e d unde r the sa fe t y va lve provision, 18 U.S.C . § 3553(f). Te quida Esque r argue s tha

t the fa c ts unde rly ing the sa fe ty va lve de te rm ination m

u st be subm itte d to a

jury unde r Alle y n e v . Unite d State

s , 133 S. C t. 2151 (2013). This argum e nt is fore c l ose d. S e e Unite d State

s v . Lizarraga-C

arrizale s , 757 F.3d 995, 999 (9th C i r. 2014) (“ [T] he de n ia l of sa fe ty va lve re lie f doe s not inc re a se the sta tutory m a xim um or m inim um suc h tha t Alle y ne is im plic ate d . . . Ac c o rdingly , the fa c tua l pre dic ate for de ny ing sa fe ty va lve re l ie f ne e d not be prove n to a jury . ” ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 5 1 4 2
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1





                           INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We hereby consent to the use of our reports dated February 26, 1999 
accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Renaissance 
Entertainment Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, included in the 
Company's Annual Report on Form 10KSB and to the incorporation by reference 
of the aforementioned financial statements in Registration Statement No. 
33-90044 for the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, Registration Statement No. 
33-97388 also for the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, and Registration Statement 
No. 333-17167 for the 1996 Consultant Compensation Agreements.

/s/ Schumacher & Associates, Inc.
---------------------------------
    Schumacher & Associates, Inc.



April 12, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         GRANITE SUBSIDIARIES                          Jursidiction of Organization
<S>                                                    <C>
         Granite Response Television, Inc.             Delaware
         San Joaquin Communications, Inc.              California
         RJR Communications, Inc.                      Minnesota
         WPTA-TV, Inc.                                 Delaware
         KNTV, Inc.                                    Virginia
         WTVH, Inc.                                    Delaware
         WTVH License, Inc.                            Delaware
         KSEE License, Inc.                            Delaware
         KBJR License, Inc.                            Delaware
         KNTV License, Inc.                            Delaware
         WPTA-TV License, Inc.                         Delaware
         KBVO, Inc.                                    Delaware
         WLAJ, Inc.                                    Delaware
         KBVO License, Inc.                            Delaware
         WWMT-TV, Inc.                                 Delaware
         WWMT-TV License, Inc.                         Delaware
         WKBW-TV, Inc.                                 Delaware
         WKBW-TV License, Inc.                         Delaware
         Queen City Broadcasting of New York, Inc.     New York
         Queen City Broadcasting, Inc.                 Delaware
         WXON License, Inc.                            Delaware
         WXON, Inc.                                    Delaware
         WEEK, Inc.                                    Delaware
         WEEK License, Inc.                            Delaware
         WLAJ License, Inc.                            Delaware
         KOFY-TV License, Inc.                         Delaware
         Pacific FM Incorporated                       California
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence L. Spanley,
Jr., Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 14, 2005
    /s/ Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.Lawrence L. Spanley, Jr.Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement has been provided to Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-0730

Docket Number

2012-SW-048-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Columbia Helicopters, Inc. Service Bulletin No. 107-27-0005, Revision 0, dated April 26, 

2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
Summary of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.35 
 Summary of Director Compensation 
 Set forth below is
a summary of the compensation paid by MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) to its outside directors who are not employees of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. Directors that are also employees of the Company receive
no additional compensation for their service as a director. 
 Initial Election to the Board of Directors 
 Upon initial election to the MEMC Board of Directors, all outside directors are awarded non-qualified stock options for 10,000 shares of MEMC common stock.
These options will have a strike price equal to the market value at date of grant and vest ratably over four years. 
 Annual Compensation

 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) 
  

	 	•	 	 Annually (as of the date of the Annual Stockholder Meeting for that year), each person whose term on the Board of Directors extends for an additional
year or who is expected to be nominated for re-election at such Annual Meeting of Stockholders, shall be awarded restricted stock units (RSUs) for shares of MEMC common stock having a value of approximately $185,000 on the date of grant (based on
the closing price of MEMC common stock on the date of grant). Each RSU shall represent the right to receive one share of MEMC common stock. The actual number of RSUs to be awarded shall be determined in increments of 100 RSUs such that the value of
the MEMC common stock underlying the RSUs is as close to $185,000 as possible. 


  

	 	•	 	 The RSUs shall vest ratably over two years. 


 Cash Compensation 
 The directors shall receive the following cash compensation:

  

	 	•	 	 An annual retainer of $50,000. 


  

	 	•	 	 An additional retainer of $50,000 for the Chairman of the Board. 


  

	 	•	 	 An additional retainer of $40,000 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee and an additional retainer of $10,000 for each other member of the Audit
Committee. 


  

	 	•	 	 An additional retainer of $20,000 for the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and an additional retainer of $5,000 for each other member of the
Compensation Committee. 


  

	 	•	 	 An additional retainer of $5,000 for the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. 


  

	 	•	 	 An additional fee of $1,000 for each Board and Committee meeting attended. 


 Reimbursable Expenses 
 All reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred by a director for attending Board or Committee meetings will be reimbursed by the Company.
**Exhibit 32**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

**Chief ExecutiveOfficer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofBeckman Coulter, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanyingAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

Date: February 22, 2010 

 

**Chief Financial Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Beckman Coulter, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period endedDecember 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing. 

Date: February 22, 2010 

 

/s/ Charles P. Slacik

Charles P. Slacik
*Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of EAU Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian D. Heinhold, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATE: May 16, 2011





/s/ Brian D. HeinholdBrian D. HeinholdChief Financial OfficerEAU Technologies, Inc.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

February 7, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00829

- CV

Felipe N. GOMEZ

, Appellant

v.

Alan BRAID

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court

, Bexar Coun ty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CI08302 Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant (plaintiff below) is Felipe N. Gomez. Appellee (defendant below) is Alan Braid. Intervenor Wolfgang P. Hirczy de Miño sought to intervene in the trial court. On December 12, 2022, the trial court signed an order dismissing both appellant ’s and in tervenor’s cases. For purposes of appeal, the order constituted a final, appealable judgment.

While a ppellant timely filed a notice of appeal

, i ntervenor did not file a cross

- notice of appeal. However , o n January 18, 2023, intervenor filed in this court a “Motion to Dismiss or to Abate for Lack of Findings and Lack of Express Conclusions of Law

, ” and o n January 27, 2023, intervenor filed in this court a “Motion to Dismiss for Mootness.”

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure authorize “part ies” to an appeal to file a motion in this court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1(a). Because intervenor did not file a cross

- appeal, intervenor is not a party to this appeal. Accordingly, we may strike intervenor’s motions. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.4 ( k ) (authorizing court to strike documents filed not in conformity with the Rules) ; see also City of Laredo v. Montano , No. 04

- 10

- 00401

- CV, 2011 WL 5386600, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Nov. 9, 2011, no pet.) (striking intervenors brief where intervenor did

n ot file notice of appeal); Landon v. S & H Marketing Group, Inc., 82 S.W.3d 666, 685

– 86 (Tex. App.

— Eastland 2002, no pet.) (party to judgment who does not file a notice of appeal may not raise an appellate issue asserting a claim for affirmative relief).

It is therefore ORDERED that intervenor Wolfgang P. Hirczy de Miño show cause in writing, no later than February 17, 2023 , why his motions should not be stricken.It is so ORDERED February 7
, 202 3

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Mark BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80298

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: December 18, 2018

Jeannie Willibey, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Mark Black appeals a Jackson County circuit court judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Black was convicted by a jury on two counts of the class B felony of first-degree assault, and two counts of the unclassified felony of armed *854criminal action. Mr. Black alleges that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to and moving to suppress the two witness identifications. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,335] 

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on December 12, 2008, applicable to workers of Indiana Handle Co., Paoli, Indiana. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 30, 2008 (73 FR 79914).                 

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of wooden furniture components and wood turnings. 

New information shows that due to a change in ownership, Indiana Handle Co., Inc., is currently known as Crestwood Manufacturing, Inc. 

Workers wages at the subject firm are being reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for Crestwood Manufacturing, Inc. 

Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to include workers of the subject firm whose UI wages are reported under the successor firm, Crestwood Manufacturing, Inc., Paoli, Indiana. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,335 is hereby issued as follows: 

”All workers of Indiana Handle Co., Inc., currently known as Crestwood Manufacturing, Inc., Paoli, Indiana, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 29, 2008, through December 12, 2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March, 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-6238 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P