alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Statement of Compliance of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York)**

 

I, Pierre Boutros, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the “Indenture Trustee”), states:

 

(a)  A review of the Indenture Trustee’s activities for the period from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) and of the Indenture Trustee’s performance under the indenture applicable to the trusts listed on the attached schedule (hereinafter referred to as the “Indenture”) has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)  To the best of my knowledge and based on such review, the Indenture Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Indenture in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period for Protective Life Secured Trust Notes.

 

 
| Date: March 01, 2012 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (formerly The   Bank of New York), as Indenture Trustee |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                                                |
|                      | /s/ PIERRE BOUTROS                                                                  |
|                      | Pierre Boutros                                                                      |
|                      | Vice President                                                                      |

 

----

 

Schedule of Trusts

 

Protective Life Secured Trust 2006-12

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-B

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-D

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-6

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-10

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-11

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-12

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-13

Protective Life Secured Trust 2007-16

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-1

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-C

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-3

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-4

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-5

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-6

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-7

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-8

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-9

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-10

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-11

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-12

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-13

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-14

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-15

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-16

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-17

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-18

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-19

Protective Life Secured Trust 2008-20

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2009



/s/ J. Roe BuckleyJ. Roe Buckley Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of the Registrant
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1
- 0070 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CAMERON MASON STONE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0
-day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including June 2 , 202 1 within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 27 2021

04/27/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0070
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7317

CALVIN ROBINSON-BEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

JOHN MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; WILLIAM SMITH;

MAJOR ROLLINS; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer

at the Maryland House of Correction Annex, in

their individual and official capacities; JACK

KAVANAUGH, Assistant Commissioner; A. DENNIS,

Case Management,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99-

1640-AMD)

Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Calvin Robinson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Michelle Eaves,

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Robinson-Bey appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Robinson-Bey v. Corcoran, No. CA-99-1640-

AMD (D. Md. filed Aug. 21, 2000, entered Aug. 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

PESTICIDE CONTROL PROGRAM

P.O.BOX 411, TRENTON, NJ 08625-0411

MOSQUITO/FLY CONTROL PERMIT APPLICATION

Office Use Only! Please see additional instructions for the proper completion of this application.

Permit #

1. Person/Organization Requesting Treatment: 2. Organization/Applicator Business Performing

Application:

Name of Organization Applicator’s Name and License #

Contact Person’s Name Applicator Business Name and License #

Address Address

City State Zip Code City State Zip Code

Telephone# Telephone# Fax#

3. Type of Application: Larviciding ( ), Adulticiding ( ), Both ( )

4. Location of Area to be Treated:

County Township/Municipality

5. Area to be Treated (target site):

6. Target Pest(s) (specify species):

7. Method for Determining when to spray: Dipper ( ), Bite Count ( ), Trap Count ( ), Complaints ( ), Other__________

8. Pesticide(s) Proposed for Use:

Product Name EPA Reg.# Dilution A pplication Rate Application Method

9. Attach a sketch or map of the treatment area with the specific area(s), described in #5 above, clearly marked.

The applicator certifies the truth of the above statements, agrees to follow the most curre nt label directions for the

pesticides to be used, is responsible for all damages wh ich may occur when proposed treatments are performed,

agrees to abide by all conditions as specified upon approval of this permit, and agrees to submit records of application

to the County Mosquito Control Agency and Pesticide Control Program within 3 weeks of the application.

Applicator Name (print) Applicator Signature Date



### THIS IS NOT A VALID PERMIT UNLESS AN APPROVAL PAGE IS ATTACHED, SIGNED AND

STAMPED “VALID”.

## FOR COUNTY MOSQUI TO AGENCY USE ONLY

10. Application Equipment:

Make Model Serial #

11. Is application equipment properly calibrated & maintained? Yes ( ) No ( ) MMD _______________

12. Is this control program recommended? Yes ( ) No ( )

13. Comments on #12 above:

Authorized Signature of County Mosquito Official Date

NOTE: THE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL AGENCY IS NOT LIABLE FOR ANY ACTION BY THE APPLICANT IF

THIS PERMIT IS APPROVED.



## FOR NEW JERSEY STATE OFFICE OF MOSQUITO CONTROL COORDINATION

USE ONLY

14. Is this control program recommended? Yes ( ) No ( )

15. Comments on #14 above:

Authorized Signature of State Mosquito Official Date

NOTE: THE NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF MOSQUITO CONTROL COORDINA TION IS NOT LIABLE FOR ANY

ACTION BY THE APPLICANT IF THIS PERMIT IS APPROVED.

9/07
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeremy Todd O'DELL, Appellant.

WD 80944

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: October 30, 2018

Attorneys: Jeffrey Eastman, Gladstone, MO Counsel for Appellant.

Attorneys: Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Jeremy Todd O'Dell appeals the conviction by a Clay County jury of driving while intoxicated. § 577.010. The trial court sentenced Mr. O'Dell as an aggravated offender to four years of imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
#### Yellow Trading Limited, Respondent, v Fratelli Ricatto Import & Export Co., Inc., Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 610]

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), dated January 3, 2000, which, after an inquest on the issue of damages upon the striking of its answer, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $59,835.81.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the plaintiff’s motion to strike its answer, pursuant to the terms of a so-ordered stipulation providing for such a remedy, after the defendant failed to timely provide agreed-to disclosure *(see,*CPLR 3126; *cf., Sandcham Realty Corp. v Sonnenschine,*246 AD2d 477).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit *(see, Aliano v LaMaina,*176 Misc 2d 975, *affd*255 AD2d 276). Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
[No. 52383-0-I.

Division One.

June 1, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. James E. Kelly, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-1-08567-5, Donald D. Haley, J., entered April 28, 2003. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 22, 2020
No. 04-20-00462-CV

IN RE BERRIDGE MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 Proceeding Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
On September 18, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On September 29, 2020, relator filed an amended petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion for temporary relief pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted on September 18, 2020. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than November 6, 2020. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED October 22, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-CI-07623, styled Jared Martin v. Berridge Manufacturing Company , pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable David A. Canales signed the order at issue in this original proceeding.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| January      13, 2011 |   |   | By:  /s/ Soren Nielsen        |   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                  |   |   | Soren      Nielsen                 |   |   |
|                  |   |   | Chief      Executive Officer       |   |   |
|                  |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 53 (Friday, March 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6072]



[[Page 11926]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13387-000]


Liberty University, Inc., Notice of Competing Preliminary Permit 
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments and Motions To 
Intervene

March 12, 2009.
    On March 6, 2009, Liberty University, Inc., filed an application, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to 
study the feasibility of the Scott's Mill Project No. 13387 to be 
located on the James River in Amherst and Bedford Counties, Virginia.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) The existing 15-foot-
high, 925-foot-long Scott's Mill dam; (2) an existing 316-acre 
reservoir with a normal water surface elevation of 511 feet mean sea 
level; (3) a new powerhouse containing 4 generating units with a total 
installed capacity of 4.8 MW; (4) a new 70 to 500-foot-long underground 
transmission cable; and (5) appurtenant facilities. The estimated 
annual generation is 10,500 MWh.
    Applicant Contact: Lee Beaumont, Assistant to the Chancellor, 1971 
University Blvd., Lynchburg, VA 24502 (434) 592-3315.
    FERC Contact: Tom Dean (202) 502-6041.
    Competing Application: This application competes with Project No. 
13302-000 filed October 14, 2008. The deadline to file a competing 
application or notice of intent ended February 6, 2009.
    Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene: 60 days from 
the issuance of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may be 
filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) 
and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``eFiling'' 
link. If unable to be filed electronically, documents may be paper-
filed. To paper-file, an original and eight copies should be mailed to: 
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For more information on how to 
submit these types of filings please go to the Commission's Web site 
located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information 
about this project can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of 
the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Click-on general search and enter the docket number (P-
13387) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-6072 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ashley Nicole PHILLIPS, Appellant.

WD 80049

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2018

Robert J Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Christian Lehmberg, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Ashley N. Phillips appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting her of the class B felony of robbery in the second degree pursuant to Section 569.030, RSMo 2000. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Minden Bancorp,  Inc. (The "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2006 as filed  with the
Securities  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Becky T.
Harrell,  the Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                 /s/ Becky T. Harrell
                                                 Name: Becky T. Harrell
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 13, 2006

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       26
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q ofEast Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Thomas D. Leitnaker, Chief Financial Officer and Controllerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Thomas D. Leitnaker                |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas D. Leitnaker                    |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Controller |
|   | Dated: May 11, 2007               |

 

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
I, William C. Kurtz, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MonarchCommunity Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have;
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 12, 2004 By:  /s/ William C. Kurtz                        William C. Kurtz    Senior Vice President and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                  
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/ J. Roe Buckley               
|                      |  | Name: J. Roe Buckley             
|Date: August 21, 2006 |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer   
|                      |  | Mewbourne Development Corporation