alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. C ANDELARIO GONZALEZ-GAR C IA, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-50250

D.C . No. 3:14-c r-00021-LAB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Larry A. B urns, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . C ande la rio Gonz a le z -Garc ia

a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 78-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for im porta tion of m e tha

m phe tam ine , in viola

t ion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 952 a nd 960. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# F IL ED JUN 25 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Gonz a le z -Garc ia c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt le ga lly

e rre d whe n it de nie d his re que st for a

m inor role a djustm e nt unde r U.S.S.G. § 3B 1.2(b). He argue s tha t the c ourt e rre d by (i) c om pa ring him to the hy pothe tic a l a

ve ra g e im porte r of na rc otic s , rat

he r tha n to othe r like ly

pa rtic i pa nts in theinsta

nt offe nse ; (ii) limiting its a n a l y sis to the

offe nse of c onvic tion, ra

the r tha n the la rge r c rim ina l sc he m e ; a

nd (iii) re quiring c le ar and c onvinc ing e vide nc e tha t he wa s e ntitle d to thea djustm e nt. W e re vie wthe distric t c ourt’ s inte rpre tation of theGuide line s de novo. Se e Unite d State s v . Hurtado , 760 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th C ir. 2014), c e rt. de n ie d , 135 S. C t. 1467 (2015). Any

e rror in this c a se wa s ha

rm l e ss. The c ourt ultimate ly de nie d the a djustm e nt ba se d on prope r c onside rations. Se e id . at 1069 (a ffirm ing de nia l of m inor role whe re a

p pe l la nt wa s pa id to sm

uggle a signific ant a

m ount of drugs a c ross the borde r in a truc k tha t wa s re giste re d in his na

m e ). M ore o ve r, Gonz a le z Garc ia ’ s se nte n c e is within the Guide l ine s ra

nge tha t would ha

v e a pplie d ha d the distric t c o urt de te rm ine d tha t he wa s e ligiblefor the m inor role a djustm e nt. Se e Unite d State s v . Munoz-C

amare na , 631 F.3d 1028, 1030 & n.5 (9th C ir. 2011) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 5 0 2 5 0 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: August 9, 2006
    /s/ KEVIN ARMSTRONGKevin ArmstrongChief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2006
    /s/ WILLIAM KOZIELWilliam KozielChief Financial Officer   32
Willis SMITH-NUNLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105411

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

FILED: September 18, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

For Respondent: JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Willis Smith-Nunley ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following jury trial, of second-degree murder, in violation of section 565.021 RSMo., two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015; and first-degree robbery, in violation of section 569.020. Movant was sentenced to a total of two consecutive life terms of imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections.1 This Court affirmed those convictions on appeal in *State v. Smith-Nunley*, 474 S.W.3d 178 (Mo. App. E.D. 2015).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

The Honorable Thomas J. Frawley sentenced Movant to a term of life on the second-degree murder charge, a consecutive term of life on the first count of armed criminal action, and two concurrent terms of fifteen years on the first-degree robbery charge and the second count of armed criminal action.
Jeffrey Paul THOMPSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81139

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: December 18, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 29, 2019

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, Presiding Judge, and Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges *641**Order**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Jeffrey Thompson appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Thompson contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for permitting inadmissible hearsay evidence to be presented at his trial and that the admission of this evidence prejudiced him. After a thorough review of the record and existing case precedent, we conclude that there is no precedential value in publishing our opinion. Thus, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties explaining our affirmance of the judgment. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[No. 53403-3-I.

Division One.

May 10, 2004.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Samuel M., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-8-02961-2, LeRoy McCullough, J., entered November 10, 2003. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roberta TONSFELDT, Respondent, v. Sarah M. HAUGEN, Appellant.

WD 81328

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: October 23, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 13, 2018

Dana M. Outlaw, for Respondent.

Sarah M. Haugen, Appellant Pro-se.

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Sarah Haugen appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County granting guardianship of her child, R.T., to Roberta Tonsfeldt. She raises nine points of error on appeal, including allegations that the trial court erroneously applied the law and the trial court's judgment was not supported by substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jovan TYLER, Appellant.

ED 105248

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: August 7, 2018

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Nathan J. Aquino, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

*459Jovan Tyler appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction after a jury trial of trafficking drugs in the second degree and possession of a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2018).
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-080 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-622]

[[Page 2072]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0650; FRL-8398-6]

Petition for Rulemaking Requesting EPA Regulate Nanoscale Silver 
Products as Pesticides; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of November 19, 
2008, concerning a petition for rulemaking and collateral relief filed 
by the International Center for Technology Assessment (ICTA) and 
others. In general, the petition requests that the Agency classify 
nanoscale silver as a pesticide, require formal pesticide registration 
of all products containing nanoscale silver, analyze the potential 
human health and environmental risks of nanoscale silver, take 
regulatory actions under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) against existing products that contain 
nanoscale silver, and take other regulatory actions under FIFRA as 
appropriate for nanoscale silver products. This document extends the 
comment period for 60 days from January 20, 2009 to March 20, 2009.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2008-0650, must be received on or before March 20, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES 
in the Federal Register document of November 19, 2008 (73 FR 69644).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathanael R. Martin, Field and 
External Affairs Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 703-305-6475; e-mail 
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in a notice that was published in the Federal 
Register of November 19, 2008 (73 FR 69644) (FRL-8386-4). In that 
document, the Agency made the petition submitted by ICTA et al., 
available for review and asked for public comment on the same. On 
December 12, 2008, EPA received a request from ICTA to extend the 
comment period on the petition. EPA is hereby extending the comment 
period, which was set to end on January 20, 2009, to March 20, 2009.
    To submit comments, or access the public docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the November 19, 
2008 Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Nanotechnology, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: January 8, 2009.
Martha Monell,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E9-622 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER







PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Annual Report of Gold Standard Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pantelis Zachos,  the Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  January 25, 2011



/s/   Pantelis Zachos

Pantelis Zachos

Chief Financial Officer, and Director
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 294 

Recognizing the historic abolitionist events surrounding the Pearl, and 

honoring its legacy in American history. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2023 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the historic abolitionist events surrounding the 

Pearl, and honoring its legacy in American history. 

Whereas, on April 16, 1848, 77 enslaved people attempted to 

flee slavery in the District of Columbia and Alexandria, 

Virginia, on the Pearl, a schooner waiting for them in the 

Potomac River; 

Whereas, on April 14, 1848, three White men brought the 

ship to the District of Columbia, and Daniel Drayton, the 

captain and owner of the Pearl, chartered the schooner 

for $100 and arranged for the enslaved peoples’ travel; 

Whereas the escape was initiated by free Blacks Paul Jennings, who had been enslaved by President James Madison, and Paul Edmonson; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 294 IH 

Whereas William Chaplin, a White abolitionist, assisted in 

connecting the enslaved people with Drayton; 

Whereas abolitionist Gerrit Smith of New York financed the 

escape; 

Whereas 77 enslaved people, including men, women, and children, sailed on the Pearl down the Potomac River and 

then into Chesapeake Bay in pursuit of freedom; 

Whereas, on April 17, 1848, numerous enslavers in the District of Columbia, realizing the people they enslaved had 

fled, sent a posse of 35 men to seek the Pearl; 

Whereas the posse met the Pearl near Point Lookout, Maryland, and took the escapees and the ship back to the District of Columbia; 

Whereas slavery supporters formed a mob and lashed out at 

both the White abolitionists involved in the escape as well 

as free Blacks in the District of Columbia in the Washington Riot of 1848; 

Whereas the enslavers sold the escapees to traders who took 

them to New Orleans, Louisiana; 

Whereas two of the escapees were purchased and freed in an 

effort led by Henry Ward Beecher’s Plymouth Congregational Church of Brooklyn, New York; 

Whereas Drayton and two of the other ship workers were arrested for helping in the escape and were represented in 

court by Congressman Horace Mann; 

Whereas two of the men, including Drayton, after serving 

four years in prison, were released after being granted a 

pardon from President Millard Fillmore, based on a recommendation from Senator Charles Sumner; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 294 IH 

Whereas the escape is said to be the single largest known escape by enslaved persons in American history and to have 

inspired Harriet Beecher Stowe in her writing the novel 

‘‘Uncle Tom’s Cabin’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the legacy of all those who furthered freedom from slavery 

3 and all of those who were involved in the Pearl incident, 

4 and recognizes their importance to the history of the Dis5 trict of Columbia and to American history itself. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification**

 

Inconnection with General Maritime Corporation’s (the “Company”) annual report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 22, 2010 | /s/ Jeffrey D. Pribor |
|---------------------------|-----------------------|
|                      | Name:                 | Jeffrey D. Pribor |
|                      | Title:                | Executive Vice President  and Chief |
|                      |                  | Financial Officer |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

----
ACCEPTED

12-14-00339-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

3/13/2015 5:02:03 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 5:02:03 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 216 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 216

    Calling for the designation of Mexican drug cartels as foreign 
                        terrorist organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2023

 Mrs. Miller of Illinois submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Calling for the designation of Mexican drug cartels as foreign 
                        terrorist organizations.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) condemns the Sinaloa Cartel, the Jalisco New Generation 
        Cartel, the Beltran-Levya Cartel, the Gulf Cartel, the Los 
        Zetas, the Tijuana Cartel, the La Familia Michoacana/Knights 
        Templar Cartel, and any similarly situated Mexican drug 
        cartels;
            (2) calls for the designation of the Sinaloa Cartel, the 
        Jalisco New Generation Cartel, the Beltran-Levya Cartel, the 
        Gulf Cartel, the Los Zetas, the Tijuana Cartel, the La Familia 
        Michoacana/Knights Templar Cartel, and any similarly situated 
        Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations under 
        section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
        1189); and
            (3) calls for the Biden Administration to freeze cartel 
        financial assets and allow Federal investigators and 
        prosecutors to pursue enhanced criminal sentences that apply to 
        drug traffickers who fund foreign terrorist organizations.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul W. Kuhn, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avrupa Minerals Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.







Date:  May 17, 2016







/s/  Paul Kuhn

Paul W. Kuhn

President and CEO