alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PROFORMIX SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                  4,546
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         341,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                           27,058
<INVENTORY>                                           256,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      623,143
<PP&E>                                                830,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                        407,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,152,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               3,429,825
<BONDS>                                             1,719,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0  
<PREFERRED>                                                 0  
<COMMON>                                                  290 
<OTHER-SE>                                         (3,997,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       (3,997,010)
<SALES>                                             3,125,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3,125,009
<CGS>                                               1,451,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,451,204       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          370 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    338,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,507,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1,507,745)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0 
<CHANGES>                                                   0            
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,507,745) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.72) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.72) 
                                                         
                                                      

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eugene B. Witkowicz,  Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of TierOne Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
          quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.



Date:  September 26, 2002       By: /s/ Eugene B. Witkowicz
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Eugene B. Witkowicz
                                    Executive Vice President and
                                     Chief Financial Officer














                                   30
Antwon BLAKEMORE, Appellant, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

ED 106722

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: October 23, 2018

Antwon Blackmore Pro Se, 7821 Madison Drive, St. Louis, MO 63133, for appellant.

Bart A. Matanic, Ronald J. Miller, 421 East Dunklin Street, PO Box 59, Jefferson City, MO 65104, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Antwon Blakemore (Claimant) appeals from the decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) that dismissed Claimant's application for review of the Appeals Tribunal's denial of unemployment benefits because it was untimely.

*923We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The Commission's decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Freedom Environmental Services Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Borish, Interim Chief Financial Officer (principal Accounting Offcier) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Borish-------------------------------Michael BorishInterim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: April 15, 2009

117

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Assistant Secretary for  Veterans' Employment and Training 

The quarterly the Advisory Committee on Veterans' Employment, Training and Employer Outreach (ACVETEO) meeting scheduled for Friday, March 20, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., at the Omni Hotel, 401 Chestnut Street, second floor meeting room, Philadelphia, PA, has been postponed until further notice.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 11th day of March 2009.

John M. McWilliam,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Veterans' Employment and Training Service.

[FR Doc. E9-5659 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-79-P
II 

Calendar No. 406 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 562 

[Report No. 109–244] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

APRIL 20, 2006 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of April 7, 2006, by Mr. 

DOMENICI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Government of Ukraine to establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia to 

honor the victims of the manmade famine that occurred 

in Ukraine in 1932–1933. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Government of Ukraine is 

5 authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land in the 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 562 RS

1 District of Columbia to honor the victims of the Ukrainian 

2 famine-genocide of 1932–1933. 

3 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO4 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall 

5 be in accordance with chapter 89 of title 40, United States 

6 Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Commemorative Works 

7 Act’’), except that sections 8902(a)(1), 8906(b)(1), 

8 8908(b)(2), and 8909(b) shall not apply with respect to 

9 the memorial. 

10 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF EXPENSES. 

11 The United States Government shall not pay any ex12 pense for the establishment of the memorial or its mainte13 nance. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Calendar No. 406 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 562 

[Report No. 109

–244] 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Government of Ukraine to estab1933. made famine that occurred in Ukraine in 1932– of Columbia to honor the victims of the man- lish a memorial on Federal land in the District 

APRIL 20, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5478 

To clarify the Congressional intent on Federal preemption under the Energy 

Policy and Conservation Act with respect to energy conservation for 

consumer products. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. HALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To clarify the Congressional intent on Federal preemption 

under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act with respect to energy conservation for consumer products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

4 Section 327(a) of the Energy Policy and Conserva5 tion Act (42 U.S.C. 6297(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking 

7 ‘‘TESTING’’ and inserting ‘‘INFORMATION, TEST8 ING,’’; and 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5478 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘disclosure of 

2 information’’ both places it appears and inserting 

3 ‘‘submission or disclosure of information in any 

4 manner’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
**THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 


# oplaion lo.04586 **Ror Would**  **the** 

# county

**8urYoya WI.**  **Oorrirliowr8 Your**  **reQue8 t**  **ror op**  tion bs been reoelved ur4 mnt . Artiole 

# 528% Ve **tuter,** re8da 88 **r0ilwr;**

The above qwtod l8ngmge lndloator th8t the bond **or** 

### the Daputy Surtn~or 18 **r0r t&e**  

### proteotlon **0r** 

### hi8 prlnolpal, 

## to-wit, the OountJ **Sunreyor.**

It 18therefore t& oplnlaa **Or** thir dowtment tbt

### fourq8w8tlon8bOtidbO UUYOnd tsth.**mO*tiYO.** **It18 OW**  **oplnlon th8t**  

### uld **baad 8hOdd**  **k W**  **p8y8bl.a to**  **the oouaty**  **8U?VO,JO?, in**  **- -Ullt**  t0 **b flti**  **w hi8**  **Within** th. **8trtUt0, ud**  **8Ub)Ot t0**  **hi8 8mOY81.**  

### Very **tmlly PUP8**  

### ATToBmBYmxmAL O?TXM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000839950
<NAME> NORTH COAST ENERGY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,956,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,855,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    210,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,297,845
<PP&E>                                      51,955,740
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,537,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,573,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,898,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,067
<COMMON>                                        45,568
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,893,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,573,467
<SALES>                                     13,942,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,942,300
<CGS>                                       11,317,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,317,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (86,885)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,841,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                870,214
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            870,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   870,214
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
Jeffrey L. MASSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106290

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: September 25, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Ramona A. Gau, 406 East Karsch Blvd., Farmington, MO 63640.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Nathan J. Aquino, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey L. Masson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*678The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerrod CORLEY, Appellant.

No. ED 106219

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: December 18, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Casey A. Taylor, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*856*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Jerrod Corley appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree murder, five counts of armed criminal action, three counts of first-degree assault, and one count of unlawful use of a weapon. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50370

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MANUEL GUTIERREZ-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-CR-1375-ALL-H

--------------------

October 18, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan

Manuel Gutierrez-Gonzalez, whose true name is Gerardo HernandezReza, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief, Gutierrez’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 
No. 

-2-

Gutierrez’s request for new counsel is DENIED.
Sean A. PRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80752

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: June 12, 2018

Samuel E. Buffaloe, Columbia for appellant.

Danilel N. McPherson, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

*923Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Boone County, Appellant Sean Price was convicted of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree. After Price's convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, see *State v. Price* , 433 S.W.3d 472 (Mo. App. W.D. 2014), he filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The circuit court denied relief following an evidentiary hearing, and Price appealed. On appeal, we held that the amended post-conviction relief motion filed by Price's appointed counsel was untimely, and that the circuit court was accordingly required to conduct an inquiry to determine whether Price had been abandoned by his appointed counsel. *Price v. State* , 500 S.W.3d 324, 326-27 (Mo. App. W.D. 2016). On remand, the circuit court found that appointed counsel had abandoned Price, and that it was therefore appropriate to consider the allegations in Price's amended motion on the merits, as if the motion had been timely filed. The circuit court then reentered its judgment denying Price post-conviction relief. Price once again appeals. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective when counsel failed to clarify during closing argument that the jury could consider certain discrepancies in the child-victim's account of Price's sexual acts in assessing the credibility of her testimony. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7243

LIONELL ELIJAH WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NEWSWEEK, INCORPORATED; NATHAN MCCALL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-98-1130)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lionell Elijah Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Taylor Baine,

Sherry A. Ingram, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, Washington, D.C., for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is signed and date

stamped on August 27, 1999, the district court’s records show that

it was entered on the docket sheet on August 31, 1999. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we

take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Lionell Elijah Williams appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil diversity action for failure to state a claim

upon which relief can be granted and denying his motion for default

judgment against Defendant Nathan McCall. Williams filed this

action against Newsweek, Inc., and McCall alleging that they used

his picture in a Newsweek article without Williams’ consent and in

violation of Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-40 (Michie 1992). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Williams v. Newsweek, Inc., No. CA-98-1130

(Aug. 31, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification of CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

*I certify that this periodic reportcontaining the issuer’s financial statements fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this periodicreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the issuer.*

 
|   | *By: /s/ John F. Coger*                                                         |         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
|   |                                                                            |
|   | Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Chief Operating Officer |
|   |                                                                            |
|   |                                                                            |
|   | Date:                                                                           | May 12, 2006 |   |   |
|        |                                                                                 |              |  |  |  |

 

1

----