alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GenoMed, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Robyn L. Owens, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Robyn L. Owens
Robyn L. Owens
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: July 1, 2005
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 53 (Friday, March 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11987-11988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management 
Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 16, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at FAA Headquarters, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Bessie Coleman Conference Center (2nd Floor), 
Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org. METRO: L'Enfant Plaza Station 
(Use 7th & Maryland Exit)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee 
meeting. The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions);
    <bullet> Report from RTCA Task Force on NextGen Mid-Term 
Implementation (NextGen TF);
    <bullet> ATMAC Member Discussion and Recommendations;
    <bullet> Closing Plenary (Other Business, Member Discussion, 
Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability.

[[Page 11988]]

With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present 
oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements 
or obtain information should contact the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present 
a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 16, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-6176 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Falcon Natural Gas Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Massimiliano  Pozzoni,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respect,  the financial  condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Massimiliano Pozzoni
-----------------------------------
Name:  Massimiliano Pozzoni
Title: Principal Financial Officer
Date:  May 19, 2005
Shahean JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106175

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: October 16, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 19, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 29, 2019

FOR APPELLANT: Michael A. Gross, 231 South Bemiston Ave., Ste. 250, St. Louis, MO 63105.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Shahean Jones appeals the judgment dismissing his "Motion to Reopen Proceeding for Post-Conviction Relief." We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Vincent HOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 105578

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: June 12, 2018

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Garrick F. D. Aplin, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Hood appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 (2015). We have reviewed the *930briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7658

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NASSER KAMAL ALQUZA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:11-cr-00373-FDW-DSC-10)

Submitted: May 17, 2018 Decided: May 18, 2018

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nasser Kamal Alquza, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nasser Kamal Alquza seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 

motion seeking collateral review of the order of forfeiture entered following his 

conviction for cigarette trafficking and conspiracy to commit money laundering. On 

appeal, Alquza reasserts his argument that the forfeiture order is invalid pursuant to 

Honeycutt v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1626 (2017).

*

 The district court correctly noted 

that Alquza’s collateral attack on the final forfeiture order was untimely and, in any 

event, that Honeycutt addressed only forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1) (2012)—

which provides for joint and several liability for coconspirators in certain drug crimes—

and not forfeiture of property “involved in” money laundering under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 982(a)(1) (2012), the basis on which the district court ordered forfeiture. See 

Honeycutt, 137 S. Ct. at 1632-35. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We decline to address Alquza’s request to amend his presentence report, which 

he raised for the first time on appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5583 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5583

To provide a temporary minimum standard mileage rate for computing the 
     deductible costs of operating a vehicle for business purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2006

 Ms. Bean (for herself and Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide a temporary minimum standard mileage rate for computing the 
     deductible costs of operating a vehicle for business purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep Small Businesses Profitable Act 
of 2006''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY MINIMUM STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR BUSINESS USE OF 
              VEHICLES.

    For purposes of section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 
the optional standard mileage rate in effect under such section for 
calendar year 2006 shall not be less than 48.5 cents per mile.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5449 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5449

      To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify bargaining 
requirements for proposed changes to the personnel management system of 
                  the Federal Aviation Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2006

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify bargaining 
requirements for proposed changes to the personnel management system of 
                  the Federal Aviation Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    Paragraph (2) of section 40122(a) of title 49, United States Code, 
is repealed.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall be effective as of April 1, 
2006, including with respect to any proposed changes to the personnel 
management system of the Federal Aviation Administration that were 
transmitted to Congress, on or after that date and before the date of 
enactment of this Act, in accordance with the provisions of section 
40122(a)(2) of title 49, United States Code, as last in effect.
                                 <all>
```
Alesia RIVERA, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

WD 81007

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: June 12, 2018

Samuel Henderson, St. Louis for appellant.

Andrew J. Crane, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

Lisa White Hardwick, Judge

Alesia Rivera appeals the circuit court's judgment denying her petition for a writ of mandamus. Rivera had sought to compel the Missouri Department of Corrections ("the Department") to allow her to appeal the parole board's decision denying her parole. While this appeal was pending, the parole board released Rivera on parole on March 5, 2018. The Department has filed a motion to dismiss asserting that the appeal is now moot, because the parole board's decision that Rivera sought to challenge in her writ petition is no longer in effect and she has been released from prison. Thus, the Department contends that there is no remaining legal controversy between the parties and no effective relief that this *921court could grant. *See* *In Interest of J.T.S.* , 462 S.W.3d 475, 477 (Mo. App. W.D. 2015).

We find that the Department's motion is well taken. The Department's motion to dismiss the appeal as moot is granted. *See* *Brown v. Moore* , 126 S.W.3d 465, 465-66 (Mo. App. W.D. 2004).

Appeal dismissed.

All Concur.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Toney SIMPSON, Appellant.

No. ED 105907

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: September 11, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Stephen Patrick Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Mary Highland Moore, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., and Mary K. Hoff, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Toney Simpson ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury for one count of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, RSMo 2000,1 one count of rape, in violation of Section 566.030, three counts of sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060, and one count of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030. Defendant was sentenced *527as a prior offender and a persistent sex offender to life without the possibility of probation or parole on the rape and sodomy charges to be served concurrently with each other, ten-years' imprisonment for kidnapping and four-years' imprisonment for unlawful use of a weapon to be served concurrently with each other and consecutively to the rape and sodomy charges. We affirm.2

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.

2

The motion to file Defendant's Exhibit 1 is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,396]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 26, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Berkline/Benchcraft, LLC, Morristown, Tennessee.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-5919 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Dept #661, PO Box 20706, Atlanta, GA 30320-6001

 

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

 Network Planning

 September 8, 2011

Mr. Rob Hawks

Attorney, Regulations Division

Federal Aviation Administration -Office of Chief Counsel

800 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, DC 20591

Dear Mr. Hawks,

As we discussed during our phone conversation on August 31, Delta Air Lines (“Delta”) is in 

receipt of your letter dated August 11, 2011 granting in part our petition for a waiver at DCA due 

to the severe winter weather in the Northeast that critically disrupted Delta’s operations in 

January and February 2011. 

However, FAA did not grant a waiver for two 0600 DCA slots which failed to meet the 80-

percent usage requirement for this reporting period notwithstanding our explanation that 

historically these low demand periods under the HDR have slots available for allocation to any 

carrier at any time. Due to this availability, Delta believed the usage of these slots was less 

critical, but recognizes this was in error given the HDR applies equally regardless of time of day. 

As we stated in our letter dated July 8, 2011, Delta has modified our monitoring practices in 

these time periods and will fully meet the utilization requirements throughout the entire slot 

controlled time periods in future. 

Delta would like to request further consideration regarding the permanent recall of the two 0600 

slots (Slot IDs 1218 and 1592) due to the very unique situation Delta has experienced the past 

two years. Delta and US Airways submitted a joint request for the Department of Transportation 

to waive the current prohibition to purchase LGA operating authorizations in order to allow us to 

consummate a transaction permanently transferring DCA slots in exchange for LGA operating 

authorizations. This transaction has been anticipated for over two years causing increased 

complexities within our schedule planning processes. Depending on the outcome of this 

request, we tried to be prepared with a slot portfolio at both airports that would accommodate 

our plans. 

This process has been largely beyond our control, unusual and unpredictable. Currently, Delta 

is using these two 0600 slots and is meeting the utilization requirements. Permanently returning 

these slots would create undue hardship to Delta as we have future schedule plans that utilize 

these slots. We respectfully ask for relief from this decision and will immediately return the slots 

but request an immediate permanent reallocation the same day. 

Please contact me at 612-578-4122 should you have any questions and thank you for your 

consideration.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Sayre

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Director – International Schedules and Airport Access
Amendment No. 3 to License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.12 
 March 10, 2000 
 Ms. Nina M. Siegler 
 Director, Office of Technology Transfer 
 Johns
Hopkins University 
 708N Wyman Park Center 
 3400 N. Charles Street 
 Baltimore, MD 21218-2695 
 Dear Nina: 
 As you know, the License Agreement between Johns Hopkins University (“JHU”)
and Sangamo BioSciences, Inc. dated June 29, 1995, in Article IV(a) at page 9, grants JHU certain rights to invest its own funds in investment funding of Sangamo. 
 Sangamo has filed a Registration Statement with the SEC for an initial public offering (“IPO”) which we expect will take place in late March or April 2000. While we understand that Article IV(a)
was intended to apply to private financings prior to our IPO, Lehman Bros., our lead underwriter, has asked us to have you confirm that paragraph (a) of Article IV will terminate upon our IPO. In accordance with our telephone conversation on
March 9, 2000, in order to make it completely clear that Article IV(a) will not apply to our IPO and thereafter Sangamo will pay JHU $25,000 upon receipt of a signed copy of this letter and an additional $25,000 on September 15, 2000 in
consideration for the following amendment to the License Agreement and Agreement: 
 Article IV(a) is hereby amended by adding
the following sentence at the end of paragraph (a): “The provisions of this paragraph (a) will terminate upon the sale by the Company of its Common Stock in its initial public offering made pursuant to a registration statement declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission.” 
 JHU acknowledges that Sangamo has complied with all of the provisions of
Article IV(a). 
 Please sign a copy of this letter and return it to me at your earliest convenience. We appreciate your cooperation in helping
us become a public company. 
  

							
	Sincerely,	 		 	 THE FOREGOING IS AGREED TO:
 Johns Hopkins University

	 /s/ Edward Lanphier
	 		 		 	
				
	Edward Lanphier	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Theodore O. Poehler

	President & CEO	 		 	Dated:	 	March 15, 2000
<PAGE>

                           GRANITE BROADCASTING CORPORATION
                                     SUBSIDIARIES

         Granite Response Television
         San Joaquin Communications, Inc.
         RJR Communications, Inc.
         WPTA-TV, Inc.
         KNTV, Inc.
         WTVH, Inc.
         WTVH License, Inc.
         KSEE License, Inc.
         KBJR License, Inc.
         KNTV License, Inc.
         WPTA-TV License, Inc.
         KBVO, Inc.
         KBVO License, Inc.
         WWMT-TV, Inc.
         WWMT-TV License, Inc.
         WKBW-TV, Inc.
         WKBW-TV License, Inc.
         Queen City Broadcasting of New York, Inc.
         Queen City Broadcasting, Inc.
         Queen City III Limited Partnership
         WXON License Inc.
         WXON, Inc.
         WEEK, Inc.
         WEEK License, Inc.
         WLAJ, Inc.
         WLAJ License, Inc.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Axcan Intermediate Holdings
Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr.
Frank A.G.M. Verwiel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
 
   Date:
December 17, 2009
  /s/
Dr. Frank A.G.M.
Verwiel
 Dr. Frank
A.G.M. Verwiel
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 
   - 163
-
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 13, 2010
    
    /s/ JAMES HYATT

President,Chief Executive Officer, and DirectorDate: May 13, 2010
    
    /s/ WILLIAM KOZIEL

William KozielChief Financial Officer (chief accounting officer)Treasurer and Secretary
    32