alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2/09/2013

Patrick Goodrich 

P.O. Box 123 

Klawock AK

99925

Lauralyn (“Laura”) J. Remo 

DOT, Office of Aviation Analysis, Air Carrier Fitness Division, X-56 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

United States of America

Dear Ms. Remo,

I am writing to you as an employee of Island Air Express and a full time resident of Prince of Wales Island. I 

support Island Air Express being granted the ability to carry mail. I don’t support this simply for my own 

economic reasons, but as a resident who also relies heavily on air service. 

Island Air Express provides the most reliable service to Prince of Wales Island. The weather here in Southern 

Southeast Alaska is often not very nice, making it hard for the float planes to deliver the mail. Because of our

IFR capability we can often fly when the float planes are grounded. 

As I’m sure you knowliving on a remote island in Alaska the mail is very important to us. We are not just waiting 

for letters but more so for food, medicine, clothing, and other vital supplies. If Island Air was granted the right 

to carry the mail then those vital supplies would be delivered on a far more reliable basis. 

It is not just the mail service that is important to the residents of the Prince of Wales. Island Air provides the 

safest air transportation to and from Klawock. This is important to us because medical,school, family and work 

needs take loved ones away from the island on a regular basis. It is a wonderful piece of mind when sending my 

wife and son on a flight that I know it will safely arrive at its destination. 

Island Air is locally based, staffed, and owned. Prince of Wales needs the jobs that Island Air provides to local 

residents. My position as a pilot with Island Air allows me to own a home and live full time in Klawock with my 

family. 

I can say with total confidence that for safety and reliability in Southeast Alaska you will not find a more able 

carrier then Island Air Express. 

Sincerely,

Patrick Goodrich

Resident of Klawock

Chief Pilot

Island Air Express
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 551

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to direct 

local educational agencies to release secondary school student information 

to military recruiters if the student’s parent provides written consent 

for the release, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to direct local educational agencies to release 

secondary school student information to military recruiters if the student’s parent provides written consent for 

the release, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Privacy Pro5 tection Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 551 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS BY MILITARY RECRUITERS TO SECONDARY 

2 SCHOOL STUDENT INFORMATION. 

3 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 9528 of the Elementary 

4 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7908) 

5 is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating subsections (a) through (d) 

7 as subsections (b) through (e), respectively; 

8 (2) by inserting before subsection (b) (as so re9 designated) the following: 

10 ‘‘(a) MILITARY RECRUITERS.—

11 ‘‘(1) ACCESS TO STUDENT RECRUITING INFOR12 MATION.—Notwithstanding section 503(c) of title 

13 10, United States Code, each local educational agen14 cy receiving assistance under this Act shall provide, 

15 on a request made by military recruiters, access to 

16 the name, address, and telephone listing of each sec17 ondary student served by the agency if the parent of 

18 the student involved has provided written consent to 

19 the agency for the release of such information to 

20 military recruiters. 

21 ‘‘(2) NOTICE; OPPORTUNITY TO CONSENT.—A 

22 local educational agency receiving assistance under 

23 this Act shall—

24 ‘‘(A) notify the parent of each secondary 

25 school student served by the agency of the op26 tion to consent to the release of the student’s 
3

•HR 551 IH 

1 name, address, and telephone listing to military 

2 recruiters; and 

3 ‘‘(B) give the parent an opportunity to 

4 provide such consent in writing.’’; 

5 (3) in subsection (b) (as so redesignated)—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘POLICY.—’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—’’; 

8 and 

9 (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘military 

10 recruiters or’’; and 

11 (4) by transferring paragraph (3) of subsection 

12 (b) (as so redesignated) from the end of such sub13 section to the end of subsection (a) (as added by 

14 paragraph (2)). 

15 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by this 

16 Act apply only with respect to school years beginning after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Phantom 2 Specifications

General Features

 Ready to Fly, Multifunctional Quad-rotor System

 Customized H3-2D and H3-3D Gimbal Support

 Precision Flight and Stable Hovering

 25min Flight Time & Smart Battery

 Auto Return-to-Home & Landing

 Advanced Power Management

 Intelligent Orientation Control (IOC)

 Easy Battery Replacement

 Self-tightening Propeller

 Video Downlink Support

 CAN-Bus Expansion Module

Aircraft

WEIGHT (BATTERY & PROPELLERS INCLUDED) 1000g

HOVER ACCURACY (READY TO FLY)

Vertical: 0.8m;

Horizontal: 2.5m

MAX YAW ANGULAR VELOCITY 200°/s

MAX TILT ANGLE 35°

MAX ASCENT / DESCENT SPEED

Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

MAX FLIGHT SPEED

15m/s(Not Recommended)

DIAGONAL LENGTH

350mm

FLIGHT TIME 25mins
Phantom 2 Specifications

TAKE-OFF WEIGHT

≤1300g

OPERATING TEMPERATURE

-10°C ~ 50°C

SUPPORTED BATTERY

DJI Smart Battery

DJI Smart Battery

TYPE

3S LiPo

CAPACITY

5200mAh, 11.1V

CHARGING ENVIRONMENT RANGE

0°C to 40°C

DISCHARGING ENVIRONMENT RANGE

-20°C to 50°C

2.4GHz Remote Control

OPERATING FREQUENCY

2.4GHz ISM

COMMUNICATION DISTANCE (OPEN AREA)

1000m

RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (1%PER)

-97dBm

WORKING CURRENT/VOLTAGE

120 mA@3.7V

BUILT-IN LIPO BATTERY WORKING CURRENT/CAPACITY

3.7V, 2000mAh
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1394 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 32 ) ll-C- 2 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/3/20087:52:00AM

Sheet 32 of 56P. 2 

## -p'C~Z

AP R 

### 1 5 1993 

# oJJLIJLLLlj n OC T I 9IS9 5 i'fj Mr . JohnSchweitzer , Technica l Directo r Composite s Institut e 35 5 Lexingto nAvenu e Ne wYork , Ne wYor k 1001 7 Dea r Mr . Schweitzer : Thi s i s t o reques t specifi c literatur e fromth e Societ yof ; Plastic s Institut e Literatur e Catalog . Mr . Gre g LaFlam , o f Pacifi c Environmenta l Service s an d I hav e identifie d severa l item s from

th e catalo g whic hwoul d hel p i nou r understanding o f th e breadt ho f th e industryand i nanalytica l technigue s used . Guid e Thes e are : 1 . Catalo g #AA-107 ; 199 2 SP I Membershi p Directory& Buyer s 2 . Catalo g #BA-130 ; 199 1 Fact s & Figure s o f th e U.S . Plastic s Industry 3 . Catalo g #AF-145 ; Resin s Technica l Committe e Tes t Procedure s 4 . Catalo g IAF-18 1 SP I Stati c Metho d fo r Determinatio no f Volatil e Organi c Emission s fromPolyeste r an d Viny l Este r Resin s 5 . Catalo g #AF-185 ; styren e Emission s Profil e 6 . Catalo g #BA-133 ; Financia l and Operatin g Ratio s Surve y fNo . 30 ) W e ar e als o intereste d i ngettin g th e Fact s & Figure s (item 2 ) fo r 1992 . D o yo u kno wi f tha t i s schedule d t o b e publishe d soon ? Thank yo u fo r you r assistanc e an d w e loo k forward t o meetin g agai nsoon . I f yo u hav e an yquestion s regardin g thi s request , fee l fre e t o cal l m e a t (919 ) 541-2383 . Sincerely , Madelein e Stru

m Chemica l Applicatio nSectio n Chemical s and Petroleu mBranc h OAQPS:ESD:CPB:CAS:MSTRUM/wrussell:x2383:NCM:MD-13:4/12/9 3
CHAKLESTON.

#### Alice E. Snodgrass *et als. v.*Columbus A. Snodgrass, *Exr. et als.*

(No. 6030)

Submitted March 5, 1929.

Decided March 12, 1929.

*Henry S. Lively*and *Kcnnis K. Snodgrass,*for appellant.

*Victor H. Shaw,*for appellees.

*137Litz, Judge:

The defendant, Columbus A. Snodgrass, (as surviving partner of the firm of Snodgrass Brothers, composed of himself and his brothers, Thomas J. J. Snodgrass and Charles R. Snodgrass), appeals from a decree of the circuit court, dated March 20, 1927, appointing a special receiver for the assets of the partnership consisting of large areas of farm, coal, oil and gas lands and other property, in West Virginia.

The defendant qualified as executor of Thomas J. J. Snod-grass who died in May, 1902, and as executor of Charles R. Snodgrass who died in October, 1908. Failing to account as executor of either estate, or as surviving partner of the firm, a suit was instituted in 1922, by the beneficiaries under the wills of Thomas J. J. Snodgrass and Charles R. Snod-grass against Columbus A. Snodgrass to require an accounting by him in each capacity; and the cause was referred to a commissioner for that purpose.

The decree complained of (pronounced upon the petition of the beneficiaries under the wills of Thomas J. J. Snodgrass and Charles R. Snodgrass) was entered before the commissioner had filed his report, and a short while after a receiver had been appointed at the instance of the creditors of the ■defendant to take charge of his individual property, and after the county court had removed him as executor of the estates •of Thomas J. J. Snodgrass and Charles R. Snodgrass. He has accomplished little, if anything, in disposing of the partnership property or settling its affairs.

The circuit judge did not, under the circumstances, as defendant contends, abuse his discretion in the appointment of the special receiver. A special receiver may be appointed to take charge of partnership assets in the hands of a surviving partner who has failed to act or is guilty of mismanagement of the partnership affairs. 23 R. C. L., 30; 72 Am. St. Rep. at page 84; Rowley’s Modern Law of Partnership, p. 815; 30 Cyc. 637; section 28, chapter 133, Code. “The question whether or not a receiver will be appointed in a case is addressed to the sound discretion of the court under all the ■circumstances, and this discretion when exercised will not be *138interferred with on appeal except where the discretion has been manifestly abused. ’ ’ *Lamp*v. *Homestead Building Assn.,*62 W. Va. 66. The right of the petitioners to apply for a special receiver is not questioned by demurrer or otherwise, the only contention of the defendant being that the circumstances do not warrant the appointment.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit
10.9

      


      


      


      TRANSACTION
CONFIRMATION DATED NOVEMBER 6, 2007 

      BETWEEN
ATLAS AMERICA, LLC AND UGI ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 

      D/B/A
GASMARK
##### 



Exhibit 10 (d6) EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE
CAPITOL BANCORP LTD.
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN The Capitol Bancorp Ltd. Employee Stock Ownership Plan is hereby amended effective January 1,
2004 by adding the following participating employers at the end of the list therein contained: Name of
    
    Type of
    
    State of
    
    Date ofEmployer
    
    Entity
    
    Organization
    
    ParticipationYuma Community Bank
    
    Banking Corp.
    
    Arizona
    
    Jan. 1, 2004Desert Community Bank
    
    Banking Corp.
    
    Nevada
    
    Jan. 1, 2004Red Rock Community Bank
    
    Banking Corp.
    
    Nevada
    
    Jan. 1, 2004Black Mountain Community Bank
    
    Banking Corp.
    
    Nevada
    
    Jan. 1, 2004Goshen Community Bank
    
    Banking Corp.
    
    Indiana
    
    Jan. 1, 2004
 CAPITOL BANCORP LTD.Dated: December 1, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Joseph D. ReidJoseph D. ReidChairman and CEOYUMA COMMUNITY BANKDated: December 1, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Katherine BrandonKatherine BrandonPresidentDESERT COMMUNITY BANKDated: December 1, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James HowardJames HowardPresidentRED ROCK COMMUNITY BANKDated: December 1, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Thomas MangioneThomas MangionePresident and CEOBLACK MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY BANKDated: December 1, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Peter AtkinsonPeter AtkinsonPresidentGOSHEN COMMUNITY BANKDated: December 1, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Douglas JohnstonDouglas JohnstonPresident
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 555

To establish additional safeguards on schools acting as lenders under the 

Federal Family Education Loan Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005

Mr. KILDEE (for himself and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To establish additional safeguards on schools acting as 

lenders under the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School-As-Lender Re5 form Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SCHOOL-AS-LENDER REFORM. 

7 Section 435(d)(2) (20 U.S.C. 1085(d)(2)) is amended 

8 to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE INSTITU10 TIONS.—
2

•HR 555 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—To be an eligible lend2 er under this part, an eligible institution—

3 ‘‘(i) shall employ at least one person 

4 whose full-time responsibilities are limited 

5 to the administration of programs of finan6 cial aid for students attending such institu7 tion; 

8 ‘‘(ii) shall not be a home study school; 

9 ‘‘(iii) shall make loans to not more 

10 than 50 percent of the undergraduate stu11 dents at the institution; 

12 ‘‘(iv) shall not make a loan, other 

13 than a loan to a graduate or professional 

14 student, unless the borrower has previously 

15 received a loan from the school; 

16 ‘‘(v) shall award any contract for fi17 nancing, servicing, administration, or ad18 ministration of loans under this title on a 

19 competitive basis; 

20 ‘‘(vi) shall offer loans which carry a 

21 reduced origination fee, or a lower interest 

22 rate, or both, than are authorized under 

23 the provisions of this title; 
3

•HR 555 IH 

1 ‘‘(vii) shall not have a cohort default 

2 rate (as defined in section 435(m)) greater 

3 than 10 percent; 

4 ‘‘(viii) shall use any proceeds from 

5 special allowance payments and interest 

6 payments from borrowers, and any pro7 ceeds from the sale or other disposition of 

8 loans, for need-based grant programs; and 

9 ‘‘(ix) shall, for any year for which the 

10 institution engages in activities as an eligi11 ble lender, provide for a compliance audit 

12 conducted in accordance with section 

13 428(b)(1)(U)(iii)(I), and the regulations 

14 thereunder, and submit the results of such 

15 audit to the Secretary. 

16 ‘‘(B) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—An el17 igible lender under subparagraph (A) shall be 

18 permitted to use a portion of the proceeds de19 scribed in subparagraph (A)(viii) for reasonable 

20 and direct administrative expenses. 

21 ‘‘(C) SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT.—An 

22 eligible lender under subparagraph (A) shall en23 sure that the proceeds described in subpara24 graph (A)(viii) are used to supplement, and not 

25 to supplant, non-Federal funds that would oth-
4

•HR 555 IH 

1 erwise be used for need-based grant pro2 grams.’’.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00350-CV

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY APPELLANT

V.

TRYER PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 177,588B

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant's “Notice of Settlement and Agreed Motion 

to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; 

therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which 

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: September 17, 2015
Mary L. Dotz Retention Bonus Letter



 Exhibit 10.11 
 June 15, 2010 
 Mary Dotz 
 [Address] 
 Dear Mary, 
 As you are aware, the company has sold its operating assets. Due to your unique skills and excellent prior performance, you have been personally selected as a member of the Adaptec transition team.

 We are pleased to tell you that the Board of Directors of Adaptec has approved a new retention plan for key employees, including yourself.
You will receive a retention bonus (subject to applicable withholdings) of $ 75,000 based on your sustained performance. The retention bonus will be paid on your last work day, September 30, 2010. 

If you are terminated without cause by Adaptec prior to your last work date, you will still receive this retention incentive and severance as noted in
your Employment Agreement. 
 The Board of Directors of Adaptec and the executive team value your contributions, effort, and commitment. We
sincerely hope you remain with Adaptec during this transition. 
 Sincerely, 

 

	
	 /s/ John Quicke

	
	John Quicke
	Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE


                  CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                    ASSOCIATES CREDIT CARD MASTER NOTE TRUST


The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Citibank (South Dakota),
National Association, as Servicer ("CBSD"), pursuant to the Transfer and
Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2000 (as amended and supplemented, the
"Agreement"), between CBSD and Associates Credit Card Master Note Trust, does
hereby certify that:

   1.  CBSD is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
       Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings
       set forth in the Agreement.

   2.  The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized pursuant to
       the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust.

   3.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended December
       31, 2001, and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under
       my supervision.

   4.  Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
       performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement
       throughout such year and no default in the performance of such
       obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
       paragraph 5 below.

   5.  The following is a description of each default in the performance of the
       Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me
       to have been made by the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2001
       which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the
       action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and
       (iii) the current status of each such default: none.





        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 11th day of March, 2002.


                        CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
                            Servicer,




                                        By /s/ Andrew Lubliner
                                           ---------------------
                                        Name:  Andrew Lubliner
                                        Title: Servicing Officer
Employment Agreement between us and Blaine McPeak



 Exhibit 10.35 
 October 12, 2009 
 Mr. Blaine McPeak 
 8969 Little Raven Trail 
 Niwot, CO 80503

 Dear Blaine: 
 Congratulations on
your promotion to President – WhiteWave Foods Company. You will continue to be based in Broomfield, CO, and this position will report to me. 
 Here are the specifics of your offer: 
 Effective Date 
 The effective date of your new position is November 1, 2009. 
 Base Salary 
 You will be paid $18,750.00 on a semi-monthly basis, less payroll taxes, which
equates to an annual salary of $450,000.00 (+9.9%), less payroll taxes. Your salary will be reviewed annually (next in March 2010). 
 Annual
Incentive Opportunity 
 You will continue to be eligible to earn an annual incentive as a participant in the 2009 WhiteWave Short-term
Incentive Plan for the Senior Leadership Team. Effective November 1, 2009, your new target equals 65% of your annualized base salary, subject to the achievement of certain financial targets for WhiteWave and specific individual objectives. For
2009, your incentive will be prorated based on the amount of time you were in each position. 
 Long Term Incentive Compensation –
Special Promotion Grant 
 On November 3, 2009, and subject to Compensation Committee approval, you will be granted options to purchase
shares of Dean Foods common stock having a Black Scholes value, as determined by Mercer Consulting, of $57,500. Your actual grant will be calculated based on the closing price of Dean Foods stock on the date of grant. The options will vest in equal
installments over a period of three years, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. In addition, you will be granted restricted stock units having a value of $57,500. Your actual grant will be calculated based on the closing
price of Dean Foods stock on the date of grant. The restricted stock units will vest in equal installments over a period of three years, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The amount and nature of any future long-term
incentive awards will be determined by the Board of Directors. 







 Benefits 
 You will continue to be eligible for FlexSelect benefits (medical, dental, vision), 401k, Executive Deferred Compensation, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), and more. 
 Conclusion 
 Blaine, I am very excited about
your new opportunity, and I look forward to your future contributions to WhiteWave. 
 Best regards,

 /s/ Joe Scalzo 
 Joe Scalzo 
 Chief Operating Officer 
 Agreed and accepted: 
  

			
	 /s/ Blaine McPeak
  

	Blaine McPeak

  

			
	 October 14, 2009
  

	Date
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,029]


Comau, Inc., Novi, MI; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 29, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by the Wiseman Automation Employees Association on 
behalf of workers of Comau, Inc., Novi, Michigan.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5904 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P