alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barb Bontrager, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Barb Bontrager

Barb Bontrager

*Chief Financial Officer*

Dated: November 13, 2009
EXHIBIT 32
                           ==========

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
(Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Lawrence Siccia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Office of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Registrant.

Dated:  August 6, 2004        /s/ Lawrence Siccia
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                              Chief Financial Officer of
                              Crafty Admiral Enterprises, Ltd.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1276

MOUSSA KOUROUMA, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-938-199) Submitted: November 3, 2006 Decided: November 14, 2006 Before WILLIAMS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kell Enow, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW & PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Moussa Kourouma, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reopen. A denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion. INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). A denial of a motion to reopen must be reviewed with extreme deference, since immigration statutes do not contemplate reopening and the applicable regulations disfavor motions to reopen. MA v. INSA , 899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc). The Board ruled that Kourouma did not establish that exceptional circumstances prevented him from appearing before the immigration judge for a scheduled proceeding. We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Kourouma fails to show that the Board abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11583-11584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
      License No.              Name/address             Date reissued
------------------------------------------------------------------------
016207N...............  Admiral Overseas Shipping   January 24, 2009.
                         Company, Inc., 323 S.
                         Swing Road, Greensboro,
                         NC 27409.
003072F...............  General International       December 26, 2008.
                         Freight Forwarders, Inc.,
                         200 W. Thomas Street,
                         Suite 430, Seattle, WA
                         98119.
017381N...............  HPK Logistics (USA) Inc.,   January 29, 2009.
                         727 Brea Canyon Road,
                         Suite 14, Walnut, CA
                         91789.
004440N...............  Sunwood International,      December 20, 2008.
                         Inc., 11222 S. LaCienega
                         Blvd., Suite 445,
                         Inglewood, CA 90304.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 11584]]

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
 [FR Doc. E9-5856 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Sara MYERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80358

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: February 27, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 1, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018

Christopher J. Swatosh, Ava, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, and Victor C. Howard and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

*583Sara Myers appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Myers raises five claims on appeal. She argues that the motion court erred in denying her motion for change of judge both as a matter of right and for cause. She then argues that the motion court clearly erred in rejecting her claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to (1) impeach a State's witness with evidence of drug intoxication; (2) submit MAI-CR 3d 310.14 regarding the jury's consideration of prior convictions on witness credibility; and (3) submit MAI-CR 3d 310.28 regarding the defense of entrapment. Because the motion court did not clearly err, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
H. R. 5606

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 221 

and 211 West Ferguson Street in Tyler, Texas, as the ‘‘William M. Steger Federal 

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 221 and 211 West Ferguson Street in Tyler, Texas, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘William M. Steger Federal Building 

and United States Courthouse’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

to be a reference to the ‘‘William M. Steger Federal Building and 

United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed December 8, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00388-CV

JAMES JOHNSON AND BERNARD WARREN, Appellants

V.

JASQ PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-01939-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Nowell, Miskel, and Kennedy

Opinion by Justice Nowell

Appellants’ brief in this case is overdue. After appellants failed to respond to 

our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without 

a reporter’s record and for appellants’ brief to be filed by October 20, 2023. By 

postcard dated October 24, 2023, we informed appellants their brief was overdue 

and directed them to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellants that failure 

to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellants have not filed their brief or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c).

230388f.p05

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JAMES JOHNSON AND 

BERNARD WARREN, Appellants

No. 05-23-00388-CV V.

JASQ PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-01939-

E.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. 

Justices Miskel and Kennedy 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 8

th day of December, 2023.
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Mobile TeleSystems OJSC (the “Company”) hereby certifies,to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)                           theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)                        theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2006
|        | /s/ Leonid Melamed       |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Leonid Melamed           |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT
      23.2







CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-18217,
      No. 333-37040, No. 333-91882, No. 333-91884 and No. 333-130355, each on Form
      S-8
      for Vineyard National Bancorp, of our report dated March 14, 2006 relating
      to
      our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
      31, 2005, which appears in this annual report on Form 10-K.






/s/
      Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP


Rancho
      Cucamonga, California


March
      17,
      2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# ACTION:

Notification of Pricing for United States Mint 2009 Annual Sets.

# SUMMARY:

                        The United States Mint is announcing pricing for the 2009 United States Mint District of Columbia and U.S. Territories Quarters Silver Proof SetTM                        , the 2009 United States Mint Proof Set®, the 2009 United States Mint Uncirculated Coin Set®, and the 2009 United States Mint Silver Proof SetTM                        .                    

The 2009 United States Mint District of Columbia and U.S. Territories Quarters Silver Proof Set will be released this spring, and will be priced at $29.95.

The 2009 United States Mint Proof Set will be released this summer, and will be priced at $29.95.

The 2009 United States Mint Uncirculated Coin Set will be released this summer, and will be priced at $27.95.

The 2009 United States Mint Silver Proof Set will be released this summer, and will be priced at $52.95.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

B.B. Craig, Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint,  801 Ninth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

Authority:31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, 5132 & 9701.

Dated: March 11, 2009.

Edmund C. Moy,

Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. E9-5723 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
PHANTOM3 (STANDARD) SAFETY GUIDELINES AND DISCLAIMER (V1.2) 2015.9 

# • ,.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            ----------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                 At December 31,
                                                            ----------------------------------------------------------
                                                               1998        1997        1996        1995        1994
                                                            ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------    ---------
<S>                                                         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
                                                                  (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
  Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders        $22,719     $14,021     $10,969     $(4,690)     $14,513
  Weighted average shares outstanding (1)                      20,035      12,860      13,703      14,587       14,241
                                                            ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------    ---------
  Basic earnings (loss) per share                             $  1.13     $  1.09     $  0.80     $ (0.32)     $  1.02
                                                            =========   =========   =========   =========    =========

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
  Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders        $22,719     $14,021     $10,969     $(4,690)     $14,513

  Weighted average shares outstanding (1)                      20,035      12,860      13,703      14,587       14,241
  Dilutive potential common shares (1)                            300         343         197           -          121
                                                            ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------    ---------
  Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1)              20,335      13,203      13,900      14,587       14,362
                                                            ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------    ---------
  Diluted earnings (loss) per share                           $  1.12     $  1.06     $  0.79     $ (0.32)     $  1.01
                                                            =========   =========   =========   =========    =========
</TABLE>

(1) Amounts have been adjusted for a 2-for-1 stock split in the form of a 100%
    stock dividend paid June 1997.
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5539

AN ACT

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation 

Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5539 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Wet3 lands Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2006’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

5 Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Con6 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘fiscal year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 

8 2008 through 2012’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 

2006. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5539

AN ACT

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands 

Conservation Act.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1041

In re: RENE JHOVANY RODRIGUES BUSTOS

,

Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

.

Submitted : March 13, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rene Jhovany Rodrigues Bustos , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Rene Jhovany Rodrigues Bustos has filed an original petition for a writ of habeas

corpus, seeking release from jail and dismissal of indictment s issued against him in Wake

County, North Carolina. We ordinarily decline to entertain original habeas corpus

petitions unde r 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and this case presents no reason to depart from

this practice. Because Bustos appears to be awaiting trial in Wake County and has not

exhausted remedies available to him in North Carolina state courts, we conclude that the

inter ests of justice would not be served by transferring this case to the district court.

See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1631 , 2241(b) (2012); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a). Accordingly, we deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral

ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                     EXHIBIT 23




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 
33-49372 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-24642 on Form S-4, 
Registration Statement No. 33-41503 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement 
No. 33-61750 on Form S-3 of Redwood Empire Bancorp of our report dated 
January 23, 1998 (March 17, 1998, as to Note S) appearing in this Annual 
Report on Form 10-K of Redwood Empire Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 
1997.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Sacramento, California
March 23, 1998
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00199

- CV

P RINCESS E AGLIN , I NDIVIDUALLY
AND AS R EPRESENTATIVE OF THE E STATE OF S TARR B RUNSON , D ECEASED , Appellant

V

.

J ONATHAN P URCELL , M.D. , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 462nd District Court

of Denton County ( 17

- 1529

- 442 )

January 14, 202 1

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that th e re
was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Princes s Eaglin shall pay all of the costs of this appeal,

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF A PPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell Justice Wade Birdwell
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 557

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize appropriations 

for fiscal years 2005 through 2011 to carry out the State Criminal 

Alien Assistance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2005

Mr. KOLBE (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. FARR, 

Mr. FLAKE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. ISSA, 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. PEARCE, 

Mr. REYES, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. 

SHADEGG, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. STARK, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, and Ms. WATSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize 

appropriations for fiscal years 2005 through 2011 to 

carry out the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Criminal Alien 

5 Assistance Program Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 557 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL 

2 YEARS 2005 THROUGH 2011. 

3 Section 241(i)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)(5)) is amended by striking ‘‘appro5 priated’’ and all that follows through the period and in6 serting the following: 

7 ‘‘appropriated to carry out this subsection—

8 ‘‘(A) such sums as may be necessary for 

9 fiscal year 2005; 

10 ‘‘(B) $750,000,000 for fiscal year 2006; 

11 ‘‘(C) $850,000,000 for fiscal year 2007; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(D) $950,000,000 for each of the fiscal 

14 years 2008 through 2011.’’.

Æ