alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SABRE TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL LTD., Appellant v. DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG, Austrian Airlines AG, Brussels Airlines NV/SA, and Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., Appellees

NO. 02-17-00153-CV

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

DELIVERED: June 1, 2017

Ralph H. Duggins, Philip A. Vickers, Cantey Hanger LLP, Fort Worth, TX, Steven J. Kaiser, Carl Lawrence Malm, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Washington, DC, Chris Lind, Andrew C. MacNally, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, Il, Karma M. Giulianelli, Jason C. Murray, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Denver, CO, for Appellant.

Roland K. Johnson, Harris Finley & Bogle, P.C., Fort Worth, TX, R. Paul Yetter, Christopher D. Porter, Richard B. Farrer, Wyatt J. Dowling, Yetter Coleman LLP, Houston, TX, for Appellees.

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and KERR, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**1

1

*See* Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

ELIZABETH KERR, JUSTICE

*601Having considered Sabre Travel International Ltd.'s petition for permissive interlocutory appeal2 of the trial court's May 1, 2017 "Amended Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss," we deny the petition.3

2

*See*Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2016); *see also* Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a), (f), (j) ; Tex. R. Civ. P. 168.

3

*See*Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(f) ; *see also**Blakenergy, Ltd. v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co.* , No. 02-14-00241-CV, 2014 WL 4771736, at *1 & n.2 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth Sept. 25, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that courts strictly construe the interlocutory appeals statute).
Michael J. HOUSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105857

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: August 14, 2018

Gwenda Renee Robinson, 1010 Market St., Ste 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Robert J. Bartholomew, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J., concur.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Michael J. Houston ("Houston") appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Houston raises two points on appeal, each charging the motion court with clear error for denying his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims. Specifically, Houston asserts that defense counsel gave ineffective assistance because she neglected to request a mistrial after learning that a juror knew a witness, and for conducting an inadequate voir dire. Because the record does not reveal any bias on the part of the juror at issue, nor show that Houston suffered any prejudice resulting from counsel's voir dire, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
```

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GenoMed, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Dr. David Moskowitz,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and President, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Dr. David Moskowitz
Dr. David Moskowitz
President/Chief Executive Officer/Chairman of the Board/Chief Accounting Officer

Dated: July 1, 2005
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Wisconsin GrainProducers, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, J. F. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|          | /s/ J. F. Robertson       |
|----------|---------------------------|
|     | J. F. Robertson           |
| * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|     |                      |
|     | Dated: August 14, 2007    |

 

----
---

Exhibit
8.1

LIST OF
SUBSIDIARIES OF MAMMA.COM INC.

|Mamma.com USA,
      Inc.                                   |  |             
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Copernic Technologies
      Inc.                            |  |             
|4332890 Canada
      Inc.                                   |  |             
|Digital Arrow
      LLC                                     |  | (Non-active)
|High Performance
      Broadcasting Inc.                    |  | (Non-active)
|Intasys Billing
      Technologies Limited                  |  | (Non-active)
|Intasys Billing
      Technologies (Canada) Inc.            |  | (Non-active)
|Intasys Billing
      Technologies (Asia Pacific ) Pty Ltd. |  | (Non-active)
|Intasys Online
      limited                                |  | (Non-active)
|Intasys Management Systems
      Inc.                       |  | (Non-active)
|Intasys Management
      Systems                            |  | (Non-active)

140
H. R. 5539

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Wetlands Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2006’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act 

(16 U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2007’’ and 

inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
exv10w22






Exhibit 10.22




AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP.

AND CHARLES DAWSON




     WHEREAS, Harland Clarke Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation (the ‘‘Company’’), and Charles
Dawson (the ‘‘Executive’’) entered into an employment agreement (as amended, the “Employment
Agreement”) dated as of February 13, 2008;



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to modify the term of employment set forth in the
Employment Agreement;



     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement,
effective as of February 2, 2010, as set forth below:




	 	1.	 	Section 2.1 is hereby modified by deleting the date of December 31, 2010 and
inserting in its place the date December 31, 2013.
	 
	 	2.	 	All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall otherwise
remain in place, except as expressly amended herein.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Employment Agreement
effective as of February 2, 2010.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Peter Fera
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Peter Fera 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Charles Dawson
 	 
	 	 	Charles Dawson 	 
	 	 	 
	 




Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0375. CAMACHO et al. v. US BANK, N. A. 

This civil appeal was docketed on September 11, 2019, such that appellants’

brief was due on October 1, 2019. Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a) (an initial brief “shall

be filed within 20 days after the appeal is docketed. Failure to file within that time,

unless extended upon motion for good cause shown, may result in the dismissal of the

appeal”). As of October 7, 2019, appellants have neither filed a brief nor asked for an

extension of time to do so. We therefore DISMISS this appeal. Id. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 07, 2019

10/07/2019
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Health Alternatives, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E, McDonald, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard E. McDonald                                  
|Richard E. McDonald                                      
|Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer



August 19, 2004
#### *S. ex rel. Barlow and Moore v. Benfield.*

Appeal by defendant from *Sharp, Special Judge,*August Term, 1949, of Caldwell. Appeal dismissed 12 October, 1949, for want of brief of appellant.
EXHIBIT  32
                           CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer  of  the  registrant  certifies,  to the best of his knowledge, that the
registrant's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004
(the  "Form  10-QSB")  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in  the  Form  10-QSB,  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  registrant.

Date: August 20, 2004

                    /s/ Masafumi Hata
                   _____________________________
                        Masafumi  Hata
                        Chief  Executive  Officer
                        Chief  Financial  Officer
                        Chief  Accounting  Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5460 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5460

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau 
  of Reclamation, to conduct a feasibility study of the Sierra Vista 
                 Subwatershed in the State of Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2006

  Mr. Kolbe introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau 
  of Reclamation, to conduct a feasibility study of the Sierra Vista 
                 Subwatershed in the State of Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sierra Vista Subwatershed 
Feasibility Study Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. SIERRA VISTA SUBWATERSHED STUDY.

    (a) Authority in General.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting 
through the Bureau of Reclamation and in cooperation with the Upper San 
Pedro Partnership, may conduct a feasibility study of water 
augmentation alternatives to identify one or more alternatives for 
project implementation and construction, including a detailed analysis 
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, that is likely to 
balance water use within the Sierra Vista Subwatershed, including Fort 
Huachuca, in the State of Arizona, with the needs of the San Pedro 
Riparian National Conservation Area.
    (b) Public Availability of Results.--The Secretary of the Interior, 
acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, shall make available to the 
public, upon request, the results of the feasibility study authorized 
under subsection (a), and shall promptly publish in the Federal 
Register a notice of the availability of those results.
                                 <all>
```
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            



|Date: November 9, 2009
|----------------------



|/s/ Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

37
SAT Report

PMN Number: S-13-0049

SAT Date: 7/26/2013

Print Date: 12/6/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: Yes Exposure based testing (health): INHALATION ONLY

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: SAT has no comment at this time

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG OVERLOAD; MUTA; SENS-L; ONCO (UNCERT)

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: S-13-0049

FATE: 

Solid with MP = 1300-1350 C (M)

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (E)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin; poor absorption from the 

lung and GI tract (analog). Concern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for poorly 

soluble particles ( rat inhalation NOAEL = 10 mg/m3, signs of lung overload at 50 

mg/m3) and mutagenicity and respiratory sensitization based on titanium oxide. Uncertain 

concern for oncogenicity.

 Test Data: rat 90-day inhalation (90-d holding) NOEL = 2.3 mg/m3, 

half-life in lungs 2.3 mo

 intratracheal instillation, observation for up to 3 months, normal lung architecture at 1 

and 3 months after instillation

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Ti oxides; SAR chemical class

=Ti oxide; solid with mp = 1300-1350 C (M); S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <180.0 

mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern *

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
(ppb)

SARs Ti Oxides

SAR Class Insoluble Metal Oxides

Ecotox Category Nano; None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
Richard J. CRAIG, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Lorna L. HOUSE, Respondent/Appellant.

No. ED 105320

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: March 6, 2018 Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 10, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied May 22, 2018

Frank Conard, 6209 Mid Rivers Mall Drive, Box 142, St. Peters, MO 63304, For Petitioner/Respondent.

Cheryl A. Rafert, 4232 Forest Park Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63108, For Respondent/Appellant.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

*927Lorna L. House appeals from the trial court's judgment denying her Motion for Contempt and Sanctions and finding Richard J. Craig not in contempt for failing to pay maintenance as ordered in the Decree of Dissolution. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was supported by substantial evidence and was not an abuse of discretion. *Nance v. Nance*, 880 S.W.2d 341, 343 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994) ; *Henderson v. Henderson*, 389 S.W.3d 260, 266 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201O-NM-061-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES () explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES () explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
October 3l,20IlAl Armendariz, Ph.D.

Regional Administrator

U.S, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200

Dallas, Texas 7 5202-2133

Dear Dr. Armendariz:Pursuant to the requirements in Section 107(dX1)(A) of the Federal Clean Air Act, enclosed is a

revised recommendation for designation of areas in Texas with regard to the 2008 National

Ambient Air Quality Standard for eight-hour ozone of 0,075 parts per million.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) developed the enclosed revision to

the March 2009 Texas recommendation, considering the latest available, certified monitoring

data for all areas in Texas from the 2008-2010 period. This revised reçommendation reflects theimproved air quality in Texas between 2005 and 2010. The commission understands that the

Unlted States Environmental Protection Agency plans to utilize the most recently certified threeyears (2008-2010) of monitoring data as the basis for designations.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact TCEQ

Chairman Bryan Shaw aL (512) 239-5510,

Sincerely,

Q*2"*s

Rick Perry

Governor

RP:tbp

Enclosurecc: Bryan W. Shaw, Ph,D.

Posr OmcB B,ox L2428 Ausnn, Tnøs 78711 (512)463-2000 (Vorce)/Dw 7-1-L ron Rrrev Snnvlcss

Vrsrr wv.TexÀsO¡uJr.{E.coÀa rHn Orncnr 'W¿s SnE or trB Sr¡18 or Trr<es
attainmenl l unc I as s i fi ab I e.

Dallas-Fort Worth Area

Collin

DallasDentonEllis

JohnsonKaufmanParker

RockwallTarrantHouston-Galveston-B razoria Ãr ea

Btazoria

Chambers

Fort Bend

Galveston

HarrisLiberty

MontgomeryWaller
**Attachment G**  **Work Sheets used to Calculate EPA Labor Costs** This attachm ent is available as part of the electr onic docket for EPA IC R #0276.15 available at www.regulations.gov , D ocket ID No. **EP A**  **- HQ**  **- OPP**  **- 2013**  **- 0617**  . **NAICS: 999100 Federal Executive Br**  **a nch**  Labor Category : For m ula Managerial Technical Clerical Unloaded Hourl y Rat e 1 = W $55.66 $36.11 $20.59 Bene f its Pe r centag e 2 Lb = B / W 44% 44% 44% Benefits per hour B = W *Lb $24.74 $16.05 $9.15 Loaded Hourl y Rate Wb = W + B = W (1+Lb) $80.40 $52.16 $29.74 Overhead Perce ntage 3 Lo = OH/ Wb 50% 50% 50% Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $40.20 $26.08 $14.87 Fully L oaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH = W + B + OH $120.60 $78.24 $44.61 1. Data Source: BLS htt p ://www. b ls.g ov/ o es/curre nt/n aics4_ 9 99 1 00. htm May 2012 data NAI CS 999100 - Federal Executive Branch Standard Occupational Codes: Manage m ent: 11 - 0000, Manage m ent Occupations Technical: 19 - 0000, L ife, Phy sical, and Social Science Occupations Clerical: 43 - 0 000, Office and Adm i nistrative Support Occupations 2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. 3. U. S. Environm ental Protection A gency , EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition , E P A - 452 - 02 - 001, January 2002, pg. 2 - 34. The loa d ing for indirect costs is within the range of 20 - 70% of the load labor rate ( w age + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.