alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>                                             EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  May 17, 2004           /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Chief Financial Officer,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
Montez THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106539

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: November 6, 2018

Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Montez Thomas ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

*931No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, David J. Gallagher, President and Chief Executive Officer of QSound Labs, Inc., do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 of QSound Labs, Inc. and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations on QSound Labs, Inc.







/s/ David J. Gallagher



David J. Gallagher

President and Chief Executive Officer



March 23, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,222]


Friction, LLC, Crawfordsville, IN; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, 
investigations were initiated on February 6, 2009 and February 22, 2009 
in response to petitions filed by a company official on behalf of 
workers of Friction LLC, Greenwood, Mississippi (TA-W-65,156) and 
Friction, LLC, Crawfordsville, Indiana (TA-W-65,222), respectively.
    The petition filed on behalf of workers at Friction, LLC, 
Crawfordsville, Indiana, was determined under TA-W-65,156.
    Consequently, further investigation of this case, TA-W-65,222, 
would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5910 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ideal Accents, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ideal Accents, Inc., and will be retained by Ideal Accents, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/S/ Karim Suleman__________________

Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer,

President, Director and Chief Financial

Officer



Date:  May 11, 2006
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A3 for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Younglin Du, CEO and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|                              | 
|----------------------------- | 
|/s/ Yonglin Du                | 
|Yonglin Du, CEO and President | 
|(principal executive officer) | 



August 28, 2007
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4559

_____________________________
R ICHARD K. C LAYCOMB , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA R EEMPLOYMENT A SSISTANCE A PPEALS C OMMISSION , Appellee.

______________________ _______

On appeal from order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

. August 15, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W ETHERELL , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and auth orized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Richard K. Claycomb, pro se
, Appellant.

Amanda L. Neff, Deputy General Counsel and Chief Appellate Attorney, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee
, for A ppellee.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2244-022]


Energy Northwest; Notice of Staff Participation in Meeting

March 10, 2009.
    On April 27, 2009, Office of Energy Projects staff (staff) will 
host a meeting in Olympia, Washington to: (1) Discuss the Packwood Lake 
Hydroelectric Project (project) draft environmental assessment (EA) 
(issued on February 5, 2009), and comments filed therein; (2) to 
discuss and attempt to resolve differences between the staff's 
recommended alternative in the draft EA with the 10(j) recommendation 
filed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; and (3) 
facilitate the processing of the National Marine Fisheries Service's 
biological opinion, the Washington State Department of Ecology's water 
quality certification, and the Forest Service's modified 4(e) 
conditions for the project.
    The meeting will start at 9 a.m. at the Washington Public Utility 
District Association building, located at 212 Union Avenue SE., 
Olympia, WA 98501. For directions please contact Audrey Desserault of 
Energy Northwest at (509) 377-8468, or via e-mail at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0f1faf4f5e3e3f5e2f1e5fce4f0d5ded5c2d7c99d8cd190d8c2d5d68d" http: northwest.com">northwest.com</a>">AJDESSERAULT@energy-northwest.com</a>. For further information about the 
meeting please contact Carolyn Templeton of the Commission's staff at 
(202) 502-8785, or via e-mail at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fdcfeedf0f3e6f1b1cbfaf2eff3faebf0f1dff9faedfcb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ccfedfee3e0f5e2a2d8e9e1fce0e9f8e3e2cceae9feefa2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5682 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5593 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5593

   To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide for the partial 
         distribution of royalty fees in certain circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2006

     Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself, Mr. Berman, and Mr. Conyers) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide for the partial 
         distribution of royalty fees in certain circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Royalty Distribution Clarification 
Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. PARTIAL DISTRIBUTION OF ROYALTY FEES.

    Section 801(b)(3)(C) of title 17, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking all that precedes clause (i) and inserting 
        the following:
            ``(C) Notwithstanding section 804(b)(8), the Copyright 
        Royalty Judges, at any time after the filing of claims under 
        section 111, 119, or 1007, may, upon motion of one or more of 
        the claimants and after publication in the Federal Register of 
        a request for responses to the motion from interested 
        claimants, make a partial distribution of such fees, if, based 
        upon all responses received during the 30-day period beginning 
        on the date of such publication, the Copyright Royalty Judges 
        conclude that no claimant entitled to receive such fees has 
        stated a reasonable objection to the partial distribution, and 
        all such claimants--''; and
            (2) in clause (i), by striking ``such'' and inserting 
        ``the''.
                                 <all>
```
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

RULE 8051 - OPEN AREAS

(Adopted November 15, 2001; Amended August 19, 2004)

1.0 Purpose

The purpose of this rule is to limit fugitive dust emissions from open areas.

2.0 Applicability

This rule applies to any open area having 0.5 acres or more within urban areas, or 3.0

acres or more within rural areas; and contains at least 1000 square feet of disturbed

surface area. The provisions of this rule adopted on November 15, 2001 shall remain in

effect until October 1, 2004 at which time the amendments adopted on August 19, 2004

shall take effect.

3.0 Definitions

The definitions of terms in Rule 8011 (General Requirements) shall apply to this rule.

4.0 Exemptions

The exemptions established in Rule 8011 are also established for this rule.

4.1. Any weed abatement activity utilizing mowing and/or cutting, and which leaves at

least three inches of stubble immediately after such mowing/cutting has occurred.

5.0 Requirements

Whenever open areas are disturbed or vehicles are used in open areas, an owner/operator

shall implement one or a combination of control measures indicated in Table 8051-1 to

comply with the conditions of a stabilized surface at all times and to limit VDE to 20%

opacity. In addition to the requirements of this rule, a person shall comply with all other

applicable requirements of Regulation VIII
TABLE 8051-1 SOURCE TYPE AND CONTROL MEASURES FOR

OPEN AREAS

A. OPEN AREAS:

Implement, apply, maintain, and reapply if necessary, at least one or a combination of the

following control measures to comply at all times with the conditions for a stabilized

surface and limit VDE to 20% opacity as defined in Rule 8011:

A1 Apply and maintain water or dust suppressant(s) to all unvegetated areas; or

A2 Establish vegetation on all previously disturbed areas; or

A3 Pave, apply and maintain gravel, or apply and maintain chemical/organic

stabilizers/suppressants.

B. VEHICLE USE IN OPEN AREAS:

Upon evidence of trespass, prevent unauthorized vehicle access by:

Posting “No Trespassing” signs or installing physical barriers such as fences, gates, posts,

and/or other appropriate barriers to effectively prevent access to the area.

6.0 Administrative Requirements

6.1 Test Methods

The applicable test methods specified in Rule 8011 shall be used to determine

compliance with this rule.

6.2 Recordkeeping

An owner/operator shall comply with the recordkeeping requirements specified in

Rule 8011.
STATE of North Carolina v. Radhwan AL-HAMOOD

No. 142P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

James R. Parish, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Al-Hamood, Radhwan.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General.

Patrick M. Megaro, Attorney at Law, for Al-Hamood, Radhwan.

Ann W. Matthews, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*70***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of April 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Davis, J. recused
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5463 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 

the age of minor children whose unearned income is taxed as if parent’s 

income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2006 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the increase in the age of minor children whose unearned 

income is taxed as if parent’s income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN THE AGE OF MINOR 

4 CHILDREN WHOSE UNEARNED INCOME IS 

5 TAXED AS IF PARENT’S INCOME. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

7 1(g)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

8 to child to whom subsection applies), as amended by the 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5463 IH

1 Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005, 

2 is amended by striking ‘‘age 18’’ and inserting ‘‘age 14’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 December 31, 2005. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Thomas D. Leitnaker, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financialand Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ Thomas D. Leitnaker                                                 |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Thomas D. Leitnaker                                                     |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer |
|   |   | Dated: August 9, 2007                                                   |

 

----
#### Pearley Frazier *v.*Board of Ballot Commissioners of Wayne County *et al.*

(No. 7473)

Submitted October 19, 1932.

Decided October 25, 1932.

*Fisher F. Scaggs,*for relator.

*Marcum, Lovins <& Gibson,*for respondents.

Litz, Judge:

Relator, Pearley Frazier, seeks a writ of mandamus commanding W. T. Lemaster and Toka Sanson, members of the board of ballot commissioners of Wayne county, and S. S. Plymale, clerk of the circuit court of said county and as such ex officio chairman of said board, to certify the name of relator on the ballot to be voted upon by the voters of Wayne county at the general election to be held November 8, 1932, as a candidate for clerk of the county court upon the independent democratic ticket.

Relator having been defeated at the last primary election as a candidate for the democratic nomination for clerk of the county court' of Wayne county, thereafter circulated certificates among the voters of the county (allegedly) under sections 29 and 30, article 4, chapter 3, Code 1931; and having secured the required number of signatures thereto, on August 15th, filed the same with respondents. September 1st, respondents acted on the certificates by placing the name of *651relator on the ballot as an independent democratic candidate for clerk of the county court of Wayne county; but rescinded their action eighteen days later.

Relator is not entitled to the relief sought because the statute requires the certificates to be filed with the clerk of the circuit court not later than the day preceding the date on which the primary election is held, and provides that no certificate shall be received after that time.

The writ is therefore denied.

*Writ denied.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1332

GEORGIA ARNETTE GREEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. BRANSON VICKERY, III, State Elect District

Attorney; DAWN STROUD, Lenoir County Clerk; W.

E. SMITH, Sheriff; ALL JUDGES FOR LENOIR

COUNTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-03-122-4-H)

Submitted: August 11, 2004 Decided: August 23, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Georgia Arnette Green, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Giles Meacham,

Jr., NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina;

Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Georgia Arnette Green appeals from the district court’s

order dismissing her action in which she sought to remove her

criminal prosecution from state court to the federal district court

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (2000). While the district court

properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the case, see

City of Greenwood, MS v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 827-28 (1966), the

proper disposition upon a determination of the lack of subject

matter jurisdiction is to remand the case to the state court,

rather than dismiss the action. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1446(c)(3), (4),

1447(c) (2000); see also Roche v. Lincoln Prop. Co., 373 F.3d 610,

612 (4th Cir. 2004) (determining that district court lacked

jurisdiction, vacating district court’s order, and directing action

remanded to state court); Virginia v. Wallace, 357 F.2d 105, 106

(4th Cir. 1966) (affirming district court order remanding criminal

prosecution to state court). 

Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s dismissal

order and remand this case to the district court with instructions

to remand the case to the state court. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED