alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael A. Gerlich,
Chief Financial Officer of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: November 7, 2007



/s/ MICHAEL A. GERLICHMichael A. GerlichChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1995 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       8,093,749
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         792,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,925,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 13,431,518
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     78,071,404
<ALLOWANCE>                                    783,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,559,133
<DEPOSITS>                                  98,414,447
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,391,972
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,646,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             107,559,133
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,545,226
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              755,456
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               268,181
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,568,863
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,392,887
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,399,588
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,169,275
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                (429,000)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (8,237)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              9,102,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,418,059
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   833,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     0.6
<LOANS-NON>                                    478,767
<LOANS-PAST>                                   320,248
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              3,446,752
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,014,433
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  696,887
<RECOVERIES>                                   894,920
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              783,466
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           533,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        120,000


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5470 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5470

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
   to eliminate automatic increases for inflation from CBO baseline 
 projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2006

 Mr. Gohmert (for himself, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Chabot, 
Mr. Brady of Texas, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Akin, 
Mr. Wamp, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Flake, 
Mr. Chocola, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. Weldon 
  of Florida, Mr. Goode, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Barrett of South 
  Carolina, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Campbell of California, Mr. 
   Hall, and Mr. Sessions) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
   to eliminate automatic increases for inflation from CBO baseline 
 projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Zero Baseline Budget Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. CHANGES IN THE BASELINE.

    Section 257(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence of paragraph (1), by striking 
        everything that follows ``current year,'' and inserting 
        ``excluding resources designated as an emergency requirement 
        and any resources provided in supplemental appropriation 
        laws.'';
            (2) by striking paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5);
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (2); and
            (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) No adjustment for inflation.--No adjustment shall be 
        made for inflation or for any other factor.''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION.

    The second sentence of section 275(b) of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by inserting ``other 
than subsections (a) through (d) of section 257'' after ``title''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6857
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPTAIN BRANKER; J. B. FRENCH, Warden, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (MISC-96-20) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cornelius Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying leave to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint for failing to comply with the terms of a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. McNeil , No. MISC-96-20 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000839871 
<NAME>                        BLACK WARRIOR
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         435,845
<SECURITIES>                                    50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,459,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                   143,559
<INVENTORY>                                    386,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,318,122
<PP&E>                                      14,138,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,791,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,085,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,989,537
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,495
<OTHER-SE>                                    (583,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,085,983
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,062,542
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,882,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (98,226)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             609,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                669,288
<INCOME-TAX>                                   222,041
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            447,247
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   447,247
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



                             CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Ridgefield Industries Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Qian Chao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 9, 2004

/s/ Qian Chao
---------------------------------------------
Qian Chao, CEO
(principal executive officer and principal
 accounting officer)
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Terry Gene MOORE, Appellant.

No. ED 105640

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: July 24, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Kevin L. Schriener, Special Public Defender, 141 N. Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, MO 63105.

*109FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Julia E. Neidhardt, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Terry Gene Moore appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 52 (Thursday, March 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Art Advisory Panel--Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in 
Washington, DC.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 7 and 8, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on 
April 7 and 8, 2009, in Room 4136 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin 
Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Carolan, C:AP:ART, 1099 14th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 435-5609 (not a toll 
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a 
closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on April 7 and 8, 
2009, in Room 4136 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court Building, 
1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the 
acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved 
in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the 
discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by 
the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.
    A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned 
with matters listed in 5 U.S.C. section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), 
and that the meeting will not be open to the public.

Sarah Hall Ingram,
Chief, Appeals.
 [FR Doc. E9-5941 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5693]



[[Page 11374]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 10, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Bank 
Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Chemung Financial Corporation, Elmira, New York, to acquire, by 
merger, Canton Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire The Bank 
of Canton, both of Canton, Pennsylvania.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. OSB Financial Corporation, Brooklyn, Michigan, to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of OSB 
Community Bank, Brooklyn, Michigan.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Beartooth Financial Corporation, Billings, Montana, to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Beartooth Bank, Billings, Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 12, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-5693 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### J. B. Elder *v.*T. M. Tucker *et al.*

(CC 523)

Submitted February 5, 1935.

Decided February 19, 1935.

*R. S. Blair*and *Harry R. Taylor,*for plaintiff.

*Thomas J. Davis,*for appellants J. Clyde McNeill and Ben F. Hammer.

*8. P. Bell*for defendants E. R. Lester and others.

*W. F. Boggess*for defendants C. D. Edelan and J. L. McBride.

Woods, Judge:

This certificate involves the sufficiency of a notice of motion, a demurrer thereto having been sustained.

The plaintiff, by his motion, seeks to recover a joint and several judgment against twenty-seven individuals, as members of a mining partnership, for labor performed in cleaning *95out and sinking to a greater depth, a certain oil well. He alleges that the labor was performed under a contract with S. G. Moyer, one of, and agent for, defendants, under a certain power of attorney. The power of attorney, which, upon oyer being craved, was exhibited and made a part of the motion, is signed by thirty-two individuals, including the plaintiff and the several defendants herein, each having a one thirty-second interest in the leasehold upon which the well was located.

It is a general rule that one partner cannot sue his co-partner, or co-partners at law, for any debt or demand towards which he must ultimately contribute. 47 C. J. 825; 20 E. C. L. 924; Note, 21 A. L. R. 21, 48. To permit this to be done, unless the undertaking by the promisors was by them as individuals, so that the contract was a personal one, amounting to a private undertaking separate and distinct from the partnership, would present the anomaly of a single individual acting as both plaintiff and defendant in the same action. *Wright*v. *Michie,*6 Gratt. (Va.) 354, 357. The notice of motion is based on the power of attorney, to which plaintiff, himself, is a party. Under it the signers became a mining partnership. *Childers*v. *Neely,*47 W. Va. 70, 34 S. E. 828. The notice of motion does not aver that plaintiff has at any time ceased to be a partner in the development of the leasehold. Nor is it shown by such pleading that an accounting will not be necessary to a determination of plaintiff’s rights. *Knopsnyder*v. *Quinn,*68 W. Va. 577, 70 S. E. 363. The demurrer was therefore properly sustained.

*Ruling affirmed.*
No. 09-8991.

#### Chandra Jenkins-Watts, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1019, 130 S. Ct. 1915,

176 L. Ed. 2d 387,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2471.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 574 F.3d 950.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 4 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

GARY MILES, doing business as

Sandoval County Watch Dog,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BERNIE LUJAN, Chairman of the

Planning and Zoning Commission of

Sandoval County, acting under color

of state law, in his individual capacity

and official capacities,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 98-2117

(D.C. No. CIV-97-969-JP/WWD)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , BALDOCK , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
-2-

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to

defendant on his civil rights claims, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff

contends that the district court 1) erred in concluding that there were no genuine

issues of material fact, and 2) applied the wrong legal standards in examining

whether the defendant acted under color of state law. 

We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo,

applying the same legal standard used by that court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

56(c). See Kaul v. Stephan , 83 F.3d 1208, 1212 (10th Cir. 1996). After careful

review of the entire record on appeal in light of these standards, and after due

consideration of the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the district court correctly

decided this case. 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New

Mexico is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge