alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tina K. PAYNE, Appellant.

No. ED 104498

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: May 9, 2017

Jedd C. Schneider Woodrail, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

*409Tina Payne ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting her of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance, a class B felony in violation of Section 195.211 (RSMo. 2000 ), and possession of a controlled substance, a class C felony in violation of Section 195.202. Appellant was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment for each count, with all sentences to run concurrently.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Form of Letter Amd to Exec Incentive Performance RSU Award Agrmnt (OCF Version)



 Exhibit 10.2(H) 
 [Yahoo! Inc. Letterhead] 
                     , 2010 
  

											
	  
	  		  		  		  		  	
	  
	  		  		  		  		  	
	  
	  		  		  		  		  	

  

	 	Re:	Letter Amendment to Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (OCF Version) 

 Dear             : 
 Reference is made to the Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (OCF Version) between you and Yahoo! Inc. (the
“Company”) dated                     , 2009 (the “Award Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this letter agreement and
the attached exhibit and not otherwise defined herein or therein will have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Award Agreement. 
 The purpose of this letter agreement is to amend the Award Agreement to provide that, for each of the 2010 and 2011 Performance Years, the number of the Restricted Stock Units (if any) that will be credited to you with respect to such
Performance Year will not be determined under Exhibit A attached to the Award Agreement but will instead be determined in accordance with Exhibit 1 attached to this letter agreement. 
 This letter agreement does not modify any other terms of the Award Agreement except as expressly set forth above (including, without
limitation, the crediting of any Restricted Stock Units to you with respect to the 2009 Performance Year and the vesting and payment provisions applicable to any such units). 
 If this letter accurately sets forth our agreement with respect to the foregoing matters, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and
return it to me. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	Yahoo! Inc.
	[NAME]
	[TITLE]


  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
		
	By:	 	 
		 	[NAME]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Arthur S. Rosten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Arthur S. RostenArthur S. Rosten
Chief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10948-10949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 10949]]


    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel. ``Dyslexia Study in Rats''.
    Date: April 6, 2009.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 496-1485. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#27444f46494049674a464e4b09494e4f09404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d3e353c333a331d303c343173333435733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 6, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-5420 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Boyd Douglas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David A. Dye, Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ J. Boyd Douglas                                 
|                     |  |  |  | J. Boyd Douglas                                     
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ David A. Dye                                    
|                     |  |  |  | David A. Dye                                        
|                     |  |  |  | Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Jonas BARRISH, Respondent, v. SKY'S LIMIT FITNESS LLC; Respondent,

CrossFit, Inc., Appellant.

WD 80319

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: May 29, 2018

Susan Robertson, Counsel, J. Zachary Bickel, Matthew Merrill, Diane Hastings, Co-Counsels, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Robert Sullivan, Counsel, Bianca Sullivan, Edmud Shine, Co-Counsels, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent Barrish.

David Bell, Counsel, Sheena Foye, Co-Counsel, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent Sky's Limit Fitness.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Cynthia L. Martin, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

CrossFit, Inc. appeals a Jackson County Circuit Court judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding damages to Mr. Jonas Barrish for a back injury he sustained while deadlifting 350 pounds at the gym owned by Sky's Limit Fitness LLC, a CrossFit affiliate. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
McSherry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                       /s/ JOSEPH MCSHERRY
                       -----------------------
                       Joseph McSherry
                       Chief Financial Officer
                       February 2, 2006
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of World Health Alternatives, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E.
McDonald, President, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard E. McDonald                
|                                       
|Richard E. McDonald                    
|President, Principal Financial Officer,
|Principal Accounting Officer and       
|Chairman of the Board of Directors     
|May 17, 2004
Mike MOELLER, Plaintiff/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants/Respondents, and Committee for a Healthy Community, Inc., Intervenor/Appellant.

No. ED 107148

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, SPECIAL DIVISION.

FILED: October 9, 2018

For Appellant: Bradley J. Ketcher, Leslye M. Winslow, Tom Appelbaum, 23 N. Gore Ste 208, St. Louis, Missouri 63119, Matthew B. Vianello, 168 N. Meramec Ave., Ste. 150, Clayton, MO 63105.

For Respondent/Cross Appellant: Marc H. Ellinger, Thomas W. Rynard, Stephanie S. Bell, 308 East High Street, Suite 300, Jefferson City, MO 65101, Michael H. McGinley, Cira Center, 2929 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

The Committee for a Healthy Community ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's grant of a permanent injunction in favor of Mike Moeller ("Respondent"), based on declaratory judgment findings that Appellant's Initiative Petition ("Petition") violated the full text requirement of Article X, Section 10.010.3 of the St. Louis County Charter ("County Charter"), and that its Petition was not in substantial compliance with Section 106.030 of the St. Louis County Code of Ordinances ("County Code").

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5583 

To provide a temporary minimum standard mileage rate for computing the 

deductible costs of operating a vehicle for business purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2006 

Ms. BEAN (for herself and Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide a temporary minimum standard mileage rate 

for computing the deductible costs of operating a vehicle 

for business purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Small Businesses 

5 Profitable Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY MINIMUM STANDARD MILEAGE RATE 

7 FOR BUSINESS USE OF VEHICLES. 

8 For purposes of section 162 of the Internal Revenue 

9 Code of 1986, the optional standard mileage rate in effect 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 5583 IH

1 under such section for calendar year 2006 shall not be 

2 less than 48.5 cents per mile. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March    29, 2006, accompanying the financial statements included in the Annual Report    of Warrior Energy Services Corporation **on Form 10-K for the year ended    December 31, 2005.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference    of said report in the Registration Statements of Warrior Energy Services    Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-57390, effective March 22, 2001, File    No. 333-57392, effective March 22, 2001, and File No. 333-57396, effective    March 22, 2001).

GRANT THORNTON LLP

Houston, TexasMarch 29, 2006

 

----
#### STATE v. HARVEY WILFONG.

(Filed 24 March, 1943.)

Criminal Law § 80—

The defendant having failed to prosecute his appeal, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss is allowed. However, pursuant to custom in capital cases, the Supreme Court has examined the record for errors upon its face, and finds none. Rule 17 of Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court.

MotioN by State to docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Patton for the State.*

Stacy, C. J.

At the September Special Term, 1942, Catawba Superior Court, the defendant herein, Harvey Wilfong, was tried upon indictment charging him with the capital offense of arson, which resulted in a verdict “Guilty of the capital offense of arson as charged in the bill of indictment,” and sentence of death as the law commands on such conviction. C. S., 4238.

*747From tbe judgment thus entered, the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court and was allowed the statutory time to make up and serve his statement of ease on appeal, and the solicitor was allowed the statutory period thereafter to prepare and serve exceptions or countercase. Appeal bond was fixed at $100. The record fails to show that any was given.

The clerk certifies that “the said Harvey Wilfong has not filed in this office any statement of his case on appeal and I am informed by his counsel that he does not intend to do so, and the time for serving statement of ease on appeal has expired.”

Hence, in the absence of error, which the record now before us fails to disclose, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss the appeal under Rule 17 must be allowed. *S. v. Morrow,*220 N. C., 441, 17 S. E. (2d), 507; *S. v. Watson,*208 N. C., 70, 179 S. E., 455.

Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.
HAARHUIS v. CHEEK

332P17-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Stephanie W. Anderson, Attorney at Law, Walter K. Burton, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Cam Bordman, Attorney at Law, Charles M. Ivey, III, Attorney at Law, Charles M. Ivey, IV, Attorney at Law, Darren A. McDonough, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Cheek, Emily.

J. David Stradley, Attorney at Law, Robert P. Holmes, IV, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Leto Copeley, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Haarhuis, Joris (Administrator), et al.

Meghan Wray Deutsch-Blanco, Attorney at Law.

Cynthia L. Van Horne, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Burton, Sue & Anderson, LLP.

John P. Barringer, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Jeffrey B. Kuykendal, Attorney at Law, for Universal Insurance Company.

Maynard M. Brown, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Stephen C. Baynard, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

Edward C. Boltz, Attorney at Law, Durham, for National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of December 2018 by National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy for leave to file Curiae Brief:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Davis, J. recused
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5504 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5504

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2006

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6029 Broadmoor Street in Mission, Kansas, as the ``Larry Winn, Jr. 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LARRY WINN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6029 Broadmoor Street in Mission, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Larry Winn, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Larry 
Winn, Jr. Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 19, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Joseph J. Hudson v. Mary A. Weston.

'' *Dram Shop Act ”—Sec.*9—Damages—Evidence.

In an action by a wife, under the “ Dram Shop Act,” to recover damages for injury to her property and means of support, this court holds that the evidence supports a verdict of $100 for the plaintiff.

*488[Opinion filed June 7, 1887.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Franklin County; the Hon. O. A. Harkek, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. F. M. Youngblood and W. H. Williams, for appellant.

The jury could not assess vindictive damages against the appellant. There was no wilfulness shown by the plaintiff, and only actual damages were recoverable under the evidence. Kadgin v. Miller, 13 Ill. App. 474; Grund v. Van Vleck, 69 Ill. 478; Brantigam v. While, 73 Ill. 561.

Messrs. Payne *&*Layman, for appellee.

The wife is entitled to recover all damages to her property or means of support, and that embraces lands, goods, salaries, wages or other sources of income. Meidel v. Anthis, 71 Ill. 241.

The .statutes give an action for three kinds of injury— injury to person, or property, or means of support. Hacket v. Smelsley, 77 Ill. 109.

. The wife has a right of action where the sale injured her in property or means of support. Fentz v. Meadows, 72 Ill. 540.

The statute was designed for a practical end, to give a substantial remedy, and should be allowed to have effect according to its natural and obvious meaning. Exemplary damages can be recovered when actual damages are proven. Freese v. Tripp, 70 Ill. 496; Albrecht v. Walker, 73 Ill. 69; Confrey v. Stark, 73 Ill. 187; Brantigam v. While, 73 Ill. 561; Brannon v. Silvernail, 81 Ill. 434; Cobb v. People, 84 Ill. 511; Lowry v. Coster, 91 Ill. 182.

Green, J.

This suit was brought by appellee to recover damages for injury to her property and means of support, under the 9th section of the *“*Dram Shop Act,” and the only point made by appellant seriously insisted on, and necessary to examine, is, that the damages allowed and for which the judgment was rendered, are excessive.

*489The judgment complained of was for 8100, and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict; the property of plaintiff damaged and destroyed by her husband by reason of his intoxi- . cation, the means of support withdrawn from her used in the purchase of liquor at defendant’s saloon, by her husband, varying in sums from 50 cents to §3 a week, for a period of about thirty-two weeks, whereby, among other things, she was not furnished with sufficient clothing, and was obliged to furnish with her own labor, clothing for her child; the loss of time by her husband while intoxicated, and consequent loss of earnings, which should have been used for her support, all taken into consideration, would have justified a verdict for a much larger amount of damages than the jury awarded.

The judgment of the Circuit Courtis affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Rene ROBINSON, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Velvet Foote v. GGNSC HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a Golden Living Center, a/k/a Sava Senior Care, LLC d/b/a McGregor Downs Health and Rehabilitation Center, and Neil Kurtz

No. 101P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Richard E. Batts, Attorney at Law, for Robinson, Rene.

Brian H. Alligood, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for GGNSC Holdings, LLC, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of March 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."