alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc. and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Tony G. Holcombe, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Companies, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompanies. 

Date: November 9, 2007 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the
corporate general partner of the General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/     DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                       
|Douglas P.
Williams         Chief Financial Officer March 31, 2003
MANISTEECOUNTY 

VISITORS BUREAU 

310 FIRST STREET, PO BOX 13, MANISTEE, Ml. 49660 - 887.626.4763 - www.visitmanisfeecoun+y.com 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division --^ •_I;i75=':-

Officeof Aviation Analysis — O,—]3 

U.S. Department of Transportation """ ri^^cl j 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE i j i^i^ ^ 

Washington, DC 20590 -5 oQ^ ' 

Dear Mr. DeVany, rN:> 

The Manistee County Convention and Visitor's Bureau supports the proposal for Alternate Essential Air 

Service put forth by the Manistee Blacker Airport Authority. 

The Manistee County Visitors Bureau was organized in 1997, under the State of Michigan, Public Act 59, 

as the official travel and tourism organization for Manistee County. The Visitors Bureau is comprised of 

24 lodging establishments representing a variety of accommodations from resort hotels to bed & 

breakfast retreats, cabins on the river, luxury homes on Lake Michigan and family-owned, quaint motor 

lodges. 

The tourism industry in Manistee County is heavily dependent on the various transportation systems to 

bring visitors to the county. Quality air transportation, especially to Chicago, is critical in providing 

access to Manistee County and northwest lower Michigan. Reliable and affordable air transportation 

plays a vital role for the area's tourism related businesses. We support the decisions of the Manistee 

Blacker Airport Authority in pursuing air service to Chicago with 30 seat commuter aircraft as the best 

means to meet the needs of the County's tourism related businesses. 

During the past year, the Manistee County Blacker Airport has seen significant growth, this was 

especially true during the busy summer months which are critical to the tourism economy of the area. 

We are encouraged by the fact that the proposal for Alternate Essential Air Service recognizes the 

increased need for air service during the summer months and is structured to accommodate the 

seasonality of service needs. That, along with service to Chicago (a major source of visitors to the area) 

and continued quality, affordable service in general are key aspects of the proposal that we strongly 

support. 

We urge your thoughtful consideration and approval of the Alternate Essential Air Service proposal put 

forth by the Manistee Blacker Airport Authority. 

Sincerely, 

Kathryn Kenny ^ ^ 

Executive Director
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>c03925exv32.txt
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
        OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Peter Lamoureux,
President of Everest Asset Management, Inc. , the general partner of the Everest
Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Fund.


                                        By: /s/ Peter Lamoureux
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Peter Lamoureux
                                        Title: Director, President and Treasurer
                                        April 15, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1997 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       6,304,011
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         594,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,970,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,176,184
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     93,719,741
<ALLOWANCE>                                    706,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,944,173
<DEPOSITS>                                 112,286,679
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,601,085
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,106,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,950,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             121,944,173
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,431,041
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              171,930
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               110,287
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,713,258
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,555,880
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,561,339
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,151,919
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   47,752
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,057)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,578,980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                341,134
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   202,134
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     6.0
<LOANS-NON>                                    339,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   111,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,928,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               783,486
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  183,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   114,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              706,803
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           706,803
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00167-CR

TEODORO MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 428th District Court

Hays County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-14-0339

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Teodoro Miguel Hernandez was convicted in Hays County of aggravated assault with a 

deadly weapon and sexual assault. Hernandez was sentenced to serve seven years’ confinement 

for his conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to ten years’ 

confinement for his conviction of sexual assault. The ten-year sentence for sexual assault was 

suspended, and Hernandez was placed on community supervision for a period of ten years. 

Sentence was imposed for both convictions June 18, 2015. In an opinion issued August 5, 2016, 

we reversed the judgment convicting Hernandez of and sentencing him for the crime of aggravated 

assault with a deadly weapon and, in lieu of that judgment, rendered a judgment convicting 

Hernandez of the lesser-included offense of assault. We remanded this case to the trial court for a 

new punishment hearing for the offense of assault, a class A misdemeanor, see TEX. PENAL CODE 

ANN. § 22.01 (West Supp. 2016), punishable by confinement in jail for a term not to exceed one 

year, TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.21 (West 2011). We affirmed the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction as to the offense of sexual assault.

On August 22, 2016, Hernandez filed a motion pursuant to Article 44.04(h) of the Texas 

Code of Criminal Procedure asking this Court to set bail pending final determination of his appeal. 

See TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.04(h) (West Supp. 2016). Because the appellant’s motion 

was filed before the filing of a petition for discretionary review, this Court has jurisdiction to set 

the amount of bail. Hernandez asked this Court to set bail in the amount of $2,000.00. The State 

filed a reply to Hernandez’ motion for bail, at the Court’s request, asking the Court to assess a cash 

surety bond in the amount of $20,000.00. 
3

It appears to this Court that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, based on our 

consideration of the nature of the crime, the sentence imposed, and all other relevant factors, bail 

is hereby set in the amount of $10,000.00, and it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court order the 

appellant released from the confinement assessed in this cause on the posting of said bail by 

sureties approved by the trial court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.04(h). The trial 

court is authorized to impose reasonable conditions of bail pending the final determination of 

Hernandez’ appeal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: August 25, 2016
FILED

December 6, 1995

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTI ON

DEBRA WHI TE ) KNOX COUNTY

) 03A01- 9505- CV- 00165

Pl a i ntif f - Appe lla nt )

)

)

v. ) HON. WHEELER ROSENBALM,

 ) J UDGE

)

ROBI N MERRI TT, J UDY MERRI TT, )

a nd BI LL SHARP )

)

De f e nda nt s - Appe l l ees ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED

DENNI S B. FRANCI S OF KNOXVI LLE FOR APPELLANT

TERRY L. ADKI NS OF KNOXVI LLE FOR APPELLEE BI LL SHARP

O P I N I O N

 Godda r d, P. J .

Pur s ua nt t o Rul e 54 of t he Te nne s s e e Rul e s of Appe l l a t e

Pr ocedur e , t he Pl a i nt i f f , De br a Whi t e , appeal s an or de r of

s umma r y j udgme nt e nt e r e d i n f a vor of t he De f e nda nt , Bi l l Sha r p.

Ms . Whi t e s ought da ma ge s s he s uf f e r e d a s a r e s ul t of a dog bi t e .

The s ui t wa s br ought a ga i ns t Mr . Sha r p, t he owne r of t he pr e mi s e s

whe r e t he dog wa s ke pt , a nd hi s t e na nt s , Robi n Me r r i t t a nd J udy
1 Ru l e 10 . (a ) Af f i r ma n c e Wi t hout Op i n i o n . Th e Co u r t, with th e

c onc u r r e n c e of al l j udge s par t i c i p a t i ng i n t h e ca s e , ma y af f i r m t h e ac t i on of

t h e t r i a l cour t by or d e r wi t hout r e nde r i ng a f o r ma l opi n i on wh e n an opi n i o n

woul d have no pr e c e d e n t i a l val u e and one or mo r e of t h e f o l l o wi n g

c i r c u ms t a n ces exi s t an d ar e d i spo s i t i v e o f t h e ap p eal :

( 1 ) t h e Co u r t co n c u r s i n t h e f act s as f o u n d o r as f o u n d b y n ecess a r y

i mp l i c a t i on by t h e t r i a l cour t .

( 2 ) t h e r e i s ma t e r i a l evi d e n c e t o s uppor t t h e ver d i c t of t h e j u r y .

( 3 ) n o r e v e r s i b l e er r o r o f l a w ap p ear s .

Su c h cases ma y b e af f i r me d as f o l l o ws : "Af f i r me d i n acco r d a n ce wi t h

Co u r t o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 1 0 ( a ) . "

2

Me r r i t t , t he owne r s of t he dog. A vol unt a r y non- s ui t wa s t a ke n

a s t o Mr . Me r r i t t and a de f a ul t j udgme nt wa s ent e r e d aga i ns t Mr s .

Me r r itt.

Mr . Sha r p ma de a mot i on f or s umma r y j udgme nt whi c h wa s

gr a nt e d. Our r e vi e w of t he r e c or d pe r s ua de s us t hi s i s a n

a ppr opr i a t e c a s e f or a f f i r ma nc e unde r Rul e 10( a ) of t hi s Cour t .

1

The Tr i a l Cour t i s a c c or di ngl y a f f i r me d a nd t he c a us e

r e ma nde d f or c ol l e c t i on of c os t s be l ow. Cos t s of a ppe a l a r e

a dj udge d a ga i ns t t he Pl a i nt i f f a nd he r s ur e t y.

_______________________________

Hous t on M. Godda r d, P. J .

CONCUR:

________________________________

He r s c he l P. Fr a nks , J .

________________________________

Cl i ffor d E. Sa nde r s , Sr . J .
3
EXHIBIT 32.1

TELVUE CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of TelVue Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
M. Murphy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:  11/20/08                     /s/Joseph M. Murphy
                                    --------------------
                                    Joseph M. Murphy
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | March 16,              2007                            |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                   |   |
|   |                                                   |   |
|   | ***/s/                Andrew W. Dorn, Jr.***      |   |
|   | Andrew                W. Dorn, Jr.                     |   |
|   | President                & Chief Executive Officer |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<S>                                                             <C>
GREKA Energy Corporation, a Colorado Corporation                6/27/88

GREKA Integrated, Inc, a Colorado Corporation                   3/23/99
(wholly owned subsidiary of GREKA)

Santa Maria Refining Company, a California Corporation          8/23/93
(wholly owned subsidiary of GREKA Integrated, Inc.)

Greka Realty, Inc., a California Corporation                    8/3/94
(wholly owned subsidiary of GREKA Integrated, Inc.)

GREKA SMV, Inc, a Colorado Corporation                          10/9/97
(wholly owned subsidiary of GREKA)

GREKA AM, Inc, a Colorado Corporation                           9/30/99
(wholly owned subsidiary of GREKA)

GRETEX, Inc, a Colorado Corporation                             10/8/99
(wholly owned subsidiary of Greka AM, Inc.)

Calox Corporation, an Indian Corporation                        6/10/92
(wholly owned subsidiary of GREKA)

Greka Energy (Colombia) B.V., a Dutch Corporation               6/21/00
(wholly owned subsidiary of GREKA)

Saba Petroleum Company, a Delaware Corporation                  3/16/79
(wholly owned subsidiary of GREKA)

Sabocol, Inc., a Delaware Corporation                           1/17/95
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Petroleum Company)

Saba Cayman Limited, a Cayman Islands Corporation               6/19/97
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Petroleum Company)

Saba Jatiluhur Limited, a Cayman Islands Corporation            6/19/97
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Cayman Limited)

Saba Petroleum Inc, a California Corporation                    2/3/92
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Petroleum Company)

Saba International Limited, a Delaware Corporation              1/2/96
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Petroleum Company)

Saba Petroleum of Michigan, Inc, a Michigan Corporation         11/4/92
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Petroleum Company)

Saba of Texas, Inc, a Texas Corporation                         6/3/88
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Petroleum Company)

Saba Petroleum (UK) Limited, a U.K. Corporation                 8/11/97
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Cayman Limited)

Saba Exploration Company, a California Corporation              5/4/95
(wholly owned subsidiary of Saba Petroleum Company)
</TABLE>
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		November 14, 2005






























MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
----

| ·   | The      Company’s control environment. |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The      Company’s risk assessment process and its policies and procedures to      determine the valuation of the loan portfolio were not      effective. |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Ineffective      process for the selection and application of accounting and disclosure      policies. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Inadequate      policies and procedures to prevent a breach of information technology      security policies by employees. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Ineffective      policies, procedures and controls for the detection or prevention of      unauthorized or potentially fraudulent transactions related to expense      reimbursement. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### W. E. Sirmans and Edith T. Sirmans, His Wife, S. E. Walker, and Betty P. Walker, His Wife, and Sirmans-Walker Company, a Corporation, *Appellants,*v. J. W. Tompkins, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed May 10, 1928.

*895*Gaines & Futch,*Attorneys for Appellants;

*J. W. Hunter*and *Harclee & Martin,*Attorneys for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The orders appealed from were affirmed by order filed March 15th, 1928. Petition for rehearing • has been filed and upon considering the same and further examination of the record we find that pursuant to an order made on the 16th day of August, 1927, a supersedeas bond was filed on September 5th, 1927, making the supersedeas order affecting the first appeal effective.

The second appeal was from an order confirming the sale made under the final decree. There being no showing to the contrary, we must assume that the sale was made before the supersedeas order became and was effective.

The order confirming the sale, however, from which order the latter appeal is taken, having been made after the order of supersedeas became effective and before the appeal to which it applied was disposed of in this Court, is invalid.

The orders and decrees appealed from in the first appeal are now affirmed. The order of confirmation of sale appealed from in the second appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded for such further orders and proceedings as may be required in the premises and a rehearing is denied.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.