alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report of WorldHealth Alternatives, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended November30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

January 20, 2003

By: /s/ Edward G. SiceloffEdward G. Siceloff, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer
Description of long-term disability arrangements with certain executives



 Exhibit 10.17 
 DESCRIPTION OF LONG-TERM DISABILITY ARRANGEMENTS 
 The Company makes
available an executive disability coverage program to provide disability benefits to the named executive officers and other management employees. The executive disability coverage is designed to replace 66 2/3 % of the base
salary, bonuses and incentive compensation of the employee up to a maximum of $25,000 per month benefit. Under the executive disability coverage, the employee pays for the premiums. 
 In addition to the above coverage, the Company provides supplemental disability coverage for David S. Haffner and Karl G. Glassman under various policies. This supplemental disability coverage provides
the following benefits: 
  

											
	 Name
	  	Current Age	  	Annual Premiums*	  	Monthly Benefit	  	Benefit Period
	 David S. Haffner
	  	57	  	$	4,874	  	$	16,300	  	Until Age 65
	 Karl G. Glassman
	  	51	  	$	1,185	  	$	4,200	  	Until Age 65

  

	*	Under the supplemental disability coverage, the Company pays for the premium.
Exhibit 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                            DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION      
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share


                                                                               
                                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                                             ------------------------------
                                                             1995          1994        1993
                                                             ----          ----        ----
   <S>                                                     <C>          <C>         <C>

   PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

   Computation for Statement of Operations
   Net earnings per statement of operations                $14,501,899  13,744,711  20,485,772

   Weighted average common shares outstanding               22,073,550  21,551,581  20,822,029

   Primary earnings per share                                    $0.66        0.64        0.98

   Additional Primary Computation (A)
   Net earnings per statement of operations                $14,501,899  13,744,711  20,485,772

   Adjustment to weighted average common shares outstanding:
    Weighted average as shown above in primary computation  22,073,550  21,551,581  20,822,029
    Add dilutive effect of outstanding stock options
      (as determined using the treasury stock method)          127,640     117,799     142,137
    Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted 22,201,190  21,669,380  20,964,166

   Net earnings per common share, as adjusted                    $0.65        0.63        0.98

   FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (A)

   Net earnings per statement of operations                $14,501,899  13,744,711  20,485,772

   Weighted average common shares outstanding as shown
    in primary computation above                            22,073,550  21,551,581  20,822,029

   Add fully dilutive effect of outstanding stock options
    (as determined using the treasury stock method)            181,446     118,211     143,415

   Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted  22,254,996  21,669,792  20,965,444

   Fully diluted earnings per common share                       $0.65        0.63        0.98


   (A)   These calculations are submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K
         item 601(b)(11) although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14
         of APB Opinion No. 15 because they result in dilution of less than
         3%.

</TABLE>
#### E. H. Crouch *v.*County Court of Wyoming County

(No. 8191)

Submitted October 1, 1935.

Decided October 8, 1935.

*Carl C. Sanders,*for appellant.

*Homer A. Holt,*Attorney General, *W. Holt Wooddell,*Assistant Attorney General, and *F. E. Shannon,*Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Maxwell, Judge :

This review involves a Wyoming County, land assessment alleged by the owner, E. H. Crouch, to be excessive.

In January, 1933, he bought of the Newberry heirs a tract of about 3,600 acres in Clear Pork District of said County and the minerals underlying about 200 acres in Oceana District. The consideration was $75,000.00. Por 1933 and 1934 the assessment on the 3,600 acre tract was $31.50 per acre, and on the mineral tracts $22.50. The total is between $116,000 and $120,000 (exact amount not disclosed by record). Crouch paid the taxes for 1933. The controversy pertains to the 1934 assessment. This assessment was made by the assessor of Wyoming County, and approved by the county court sitting as a board of review and equalization (Acts 1933, chapter *47741), and. by the circuit court on appeal (Code 1931, 11-3-25).

The statute, Code 1931, 11-3-25, allows appeal to this Court where the assessment is $50,000.00 or more. We will not disturb an assessment which is supported by substantial evidence unless it is plainly wrong. *Power Co.*v. *Board of Review,*112 W. Ya. 442, 164 S. E. 862. However, iñ the instant case we are of opinion that the assessment is not well supported.

The price paid for property is not conclusive as to value, but it may be a very important element of proof where there has been an open transaction between competent parties dealing at arm’s length as appears from the evidence herein.

On this inquiry our attention is first arrested by the fact that the assessed valuation is nearly $50,000 in excess of the price for which the property recently sold.

Secondly, we find that probably $15,000 worth of timber has been removed from the land by Crouch since he purchased it; yet no reduction on that account was made in the 1934 assessment.

Thirdly, it is to be noted that there is a total lack of evidence in the record tending to establish a basis for the valuation reflected in the assessment.

And fourthly, the nature and value of improvements placed on the land by Crouch is uncertain and indefinite.

In the light of all which we reverse the order of the circuit court and remand the case for further proceedings wherein the matters to which we have made reference may be given proper consideration in re-determination of the assessment of said property.

*Reversed and remanded.*
Exhibit 13

RULE 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vodafone Group Plc, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 March 2012 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|            |  |  |  |                    |  | 
|----------- |  |  |  | ------------------ |  | 
|            |  |  | 
|1 June 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Vittorio Colao |  | 
|Date        |  |  |  | Vittorio Colao     |  | 
|            |  |  |  | Chief Executive    |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

RULE 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vodafone Group Plc, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 March 2012 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|            |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|----------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|            |  |  | 
|1 June 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Andy Halford        |  | 
|Date        |  |  |  | Andy N. Halford         |  | 
|            |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of CaliforniaCoastal Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in their respective capacity asan officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of theirrespective knowledge, that:
|        | · | the Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | · | the information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
|                           |
|---------------------------|
| Dated: March 9, 2007      |
|                      |
| /s/ Raymond J. Pacini     |   |
| Raymond J. Pacini         |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
|                      |
| /s/ Sandra G. Sciutto     |   |
| Sandra G. Sciutto         |
| Senior Vice President and |
| Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint
Petition of

MICHAEL WILLIAM RICH IE

,

Petitioner. No. 53589

- 1

- II

UNPUBLISHED OPINION
AFTER REMAND

W ORSWICK , J.

— Michael Richie seeks relief from perso nal restraint imposed

following his 2014 conviction for second degree assault. On remand from this court, the

trial court sentenced him in 2016 to life without possibility of parole under the Persistent

Offender Accountability Act because he had strike offenses in the form of prior convictions

f or second degree robbery. After the legislature removed second degree robbery from the

list of strike offenses, Laws of 2019, ch. 187, Richie petitioned for resentencing, seeking

retroactive application of that act. The act was held not to apply retroact ively in State v.

Jenks

, 197 Wn.2d 708, 719, 487 P.3d 482 (2021). But the State now concedes that under

Laws of 2021, ch. 141, § 1:

In any criminal case wherein an offender has been sentenced as a persistent offender, the offender must have a resentencing hearing if a current or past conviction for robbery in the second degree was used as a basis for the finding that the offender was a persistent offender

. Filed Washington State Court of Appeals
Division Two

August 17, 2021No. 53589

- 1

- II

2 We accept the St ate’s concession and remand Richie ’s judgment and sentence to

the trial court for resentencing

. The certificate of finality will be issued as soon as possible.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW

2.06.040, it is so ordered.

Worswick, J.
We concur:

Maxa, J.

Veljacic, J.
USREEBPM, LLC, Respondent, v. Lisa R. HENRY, Appellant.

WD 80695

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: June 26, 2018

Marc A. Saighman, for Respondent.

Lisa R. Henry, Appellant Pro-se.

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge *101***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Henry appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, ruling in favor of USREEBPM, LLC, on its petition against Henry for unlawful detainer, restitution of certain real property, and monetary damages, pursuant to Chapter 534 RSMo. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Vibrant Health International
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas  McAdam,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




                         /s/Thomas  McAdam
                         -------------------------
                         Chief  Executive  Officer
                         August  29,  2002
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sheila GARCIA, Appellant.

No. ED 105599

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

FILED: September 18, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 22, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied December 18, 2018

Matthew J. Bell, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Garrick Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-+, for respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

The State charged Sheila Garcia ("Garcia") with one count of unlawful possession of a firearm after an officer seized a revolver and Garcia's identification from a vacant building. The trial court denied Garcia's motion to suppress the revolver as evidence. At the instruction stage, the trial court refused Garcia's request for Missouri Approved Instructions-Criminal § 310.06 (1987) ("MAI-CR 310.06"). Garcia challenges these rulings on appeal. Because Garcia lacked standing to challenge the officer's search and seizure of the revolver and was not prejudiced by the trial court's refusal to deliver the jury instruction offered by Garcia, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick L. Wessel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and                            
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 12, 2008

/s/ Rick L. WesselRick L. Wessel
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,555
<SECURITIES>                                    76,705
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,931
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               330,672
<PP&E>                                          12,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 423,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          385,602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,033
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,411<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   423,046
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,884
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,093
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (437)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (276)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,162
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES UNREALIZED LOSS ON SECURITIES AFS OF (539)
</FN>


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, David J. Gallagher, President and Chief Executive Officer of QSound Labs, Inc., do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 of QSound Labs, Inc. and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations on QSound Labs, Inc.







/s/ David J. Gallagher



David J. Gallagher

President and Chief Executive Officer



March 30, 2006
Aaron M. BALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105909

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: September 25, 2018

FOR APPELLANTS: Kevin L. Schriener, 141 North Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, Missouri 63105.

FOR RESPONDENTS: Julia E. Neidhardt, Joshua Hawley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Aaron Ball appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief based on allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel. He claims that the motion court erred because his plea counsel and probation revocation counsel were ineffective. We disagree and affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eugene B. Witkowicz, Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of TierOne Corporation
(Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               March 31, 2009 (Report) fully complies with the requirements
of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  May 6, 2009 | By:  /s/ Eugene B. Witkowicz
|------------------ | ----------------------------
|                   | Eugene B. Witkowicz         
|                   | Executive Vice President    
|                   | and Chief Financial Officer