alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: October 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 209)]
[Notices]               
[Page 66724]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29oc10-35]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 
Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collections to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be sent via e-mail to Ross_A._Rutledge@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-3086. Copies of submission may 
be obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Number: OMB 0412-0565.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Title: Applicant's Certification that it Does not Support Terrorist 
Organizations or tIndividuals.
    Type of Submission: Renewal of Information Collection.
    Purpose: The United States Agency for International Development 
(USAID) needs to require applicants for assistance to certify that it 
does not and will not engage in financial transactions with, and does 
not and will not provide material support and resources to individuals 
or organizations that engage in terrorism. The purpose of this 
requirement is to assure that USAID does not directly provide support 
to such organizations or individuals, and to assure that recipients are 
aware of these requirements when it considers individuals or 
organizations are subrecipients.

Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 2,000.
    Total annual responses: 4,000.
    Total annual hours requested: 1,500 hours.

    Dated: October 21, 2010.
Beth Salamanca,
Acting Director, Office of Management Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-27369 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5709]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Delegation of Settlement Authority Under the Federal Tort Claims 
Act

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Department of Justice Civil Division Directive (28 
CFR part 14) and 10 U.S.C. 113(d), the Secretary of Defense has 
delegated to the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force the 
authority to adjust, determine, compromise, and settle administrative 
claims involving their respective Military Departments under 28 U.S.C. 
2672 (relating to the administrative settlement of Federal tort 
claims), if the amount of the proposed settlement, compromise, or award 
does not exceed $300,000.
    The Delegation to the Secretary of the Army includes the authority 
to adjust, determine, compromise, and settle administrative claims 
arising out of the acts or omissions of civilian personnel of DoD 
Components other than the Military Departments in accordance with DoD 
Directive 5515.9, ``Settlement of Tort Claims,'' April 19, 2004.
    The authority delegated above may be re-delegated in writing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms Patricia Toppings, WHS/ESD 
Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent Street, Rosslyn Plaza 
North, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133.

    Dated: March 12, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-5709 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
NUMBER 13-09-00569-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

RAPID MORTGAGE CO., INC. , Appellant,

v.

DAVID REYES, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 92nd District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2899-07-A. Appellant has filed an

unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the appellant no longer desires

to prosecute his causes of action. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed 

the 18th day of February, 2010. 

2
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Andre Calantzopoulos



 Exhibit 10.23 

 

 

 PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 
 Andre Calantzopoulos 
 Lausanne, April 1, 2009 
 Dear Andre, 
 Further to your annual performance assessment and discussion with your supervisor, we are pleased to confirm that effective as of April 1, 2009, your
annual base salary is being increased by 4.9%. 
  

					
	from	 	CHF 1,320,000.00 p.a.*    	  	/        CHF 101,538.46 p.m.*
	to	 	CHF 1,384,682.00 p.a.	  	/        CHF 106,514.00 p.m.

 Your new Position in Range as a result of this salary increase is now 45%. 
 All other conditions
relating to your employment with Philip Morris International Management S.A. remain as stated in your letter of employment issued at the time of the engagement and, if applicable, in any subsequent amendments. 
 We take this opportunity of wishing you continued success and satisfaction. 
  

	
	Yours sincerely,
	
	 Peter-Paul Adriaansen
 Director Human Resources Decision Support &
 Business Partner Switzerland


	
	




	


  

	*	p.a. = annual 


	*	p.m. = monthly
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Vivian Lam Lee Yu, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. on the Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oxford Technologies, Inc.







|                     |  |     |  |                                                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |     |  |                                                              
|Date:  April 1, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Vivian Lam Lee Yu                                        
|                     |  |     |  | Vivian Lam Lee Yu, President                                 
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
SERVE D JUN E 23 , 201 1 '-::-.i-;TMhNTG F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N, .N^nRTATIOi '

OFFIC EO FHEARING S '"'rtf-fllijiOM S WASHINGTON , D C 

### 3 P 2 - 2 3 •I' M ^ ' I NTH EMATTE RO F GREENWOO D CHEVROLE T FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2011-048 2
NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2008WP700205 ) ha s bee nassigne d t o Administrativ e Law Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l futur e pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o nth e attache dServic e List .

Tonnie A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La ' Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-2011-048 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Housto nN . Tuel , Jr. , Respondent' s Counse l La w Office s o f

Housto nTue l 155 0 Harbo r

Blvd. , Suite 20 6 Wes t Sacramento , C A 9569 1 TEL : 916-376-010 0 FAX : 916-376-029 9 Lis aJ . Toscano , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AWP- 7 Western-Pacifi c Regio n Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 0 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Legal Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo r servic e inperso no r

b y e)q)edite dcourier , us e tli e followin g address : Federal Aviatio nAdministration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suite 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 , Attention : Hearm g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 . - 2 -
N0. 04-15-00279-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 4TH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

ABDUL H. NUBANI 

V. 

COUNTY OF GUADALUPE, ET AL. 

APPELLANT’S AND APPELLEES’ MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL 

A. INTRODUCTION 

1. Appellant and Appellees ask the Court to dismiss this appeal. 

2. Appellant perfected the appeal on April 23, 2015. 

3. The Court has the authority under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42. l(a)(2) to grant 

this motion to dismiss. 

4. The parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. 

PRAYER 

For these reasons, the parties ask the Court to grant this joint motion to dismiss. Costs 

on appeal should be taxed against Appellant. 

Page I of 2

ACCEPTED

04-15-00279-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

8/11/2015 3:03:20 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 08/11/2015 3:03:20 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Page 2 of Z 

Respectfully submitted, 

LAW OFFICE OF JAMES S. FROST 

113 West Gonzales 

Seguin, Texas 78155 

Telephone: (830)303-0404 

Facsimile: (830) 303-8584 

fcwzlaa JAMES S. FROST 

State Bar No. 07489500 

Attorney for Appellant 

ABDUL H. NUBANI 

McCREARY, VESELKA, BRAGG & 

ALLEN, P.C. 

700 Jeffrey Way, Suite 100 

Round Rock, Texas 78665 

Telephone: (512) 323-3200 

Facsimile: (512) 323-3294 

BY:[% E Q MATTHEW TEPPER 

State Bar No. 24029008 

Attorneys for COUNTY OF GUADALUPE 

fig 7~L9 '/S’ 

RANDALL R. SMIDT, Pro Se 

State Bar No. 00798509 

1207 Bay Oaks Road 

Houston, Texas 77008 

Telephone: 713-252-5613
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    13,704
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      13,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              313,824
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            100
<COMMON>                                               590
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       313,824
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   107,545
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,028,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (921,290)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (921,290)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (921,290)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.23)
        


</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5347 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 Union Calendar No. 349
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5347

                          [Report No. 109-605]

To reauthorize the HOPE VI program for revitalization of public housing 
                               projects.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2006

 Mr. Shays (for himself, Ms. Waters, Mr. Leach, Mr. Watt, Mr. Davis of 
Alabama, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Ford, Mr. Wexler, Mrs. Christensen, 
  Mr. Evans, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Scott of 
Georgia, Mr. Owens, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Payne, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. 
Miller of North Carolina, Mr. Cooper, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mrs. 
 Maloney, Mr. Upton, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Conyers, and Mr. Holt) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

                             July 27, 2006

       Additional sponsors: Mr. Castle, Ms. Harris, and Mr. Renzi

                             July 27, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To reauthorize the HOPE VI program for revitalization of public housing 
                               projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HOPE VI Reauthorization Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.

    Section 24 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 
1437v) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (m)(1), by striking ``fiscal year 2003'' 
        and inserting ``each of fiscal years 2007 through 2011''; and
            (2) in subsection (o), by striking ``September 30, 2006'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2011''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 349

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5347

                          [Report No. 109-605]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To reauthorize the HOPE VI program for revitalization of public housing 
                               projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 27, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
#### Gus C. Edwards and C. M. Edwards, His Wife, *Appellants,*v. Mary J. Meyer, *Appellee.*

En Banc.

Opinion Filed February 13, 1928.

*Walter F. Rogers,*for Appellants;

*Adrian D. Wentworth,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
#### Francis T. Behrens et al., Plaintiffs, v City of New York et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.) General Track Corporation, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[720 NYS2d 64]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered October 26, 1999, which granted the motion by fourth-party defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. to dismiss the fourth-party complaint and denied the cross motion by fourth-party plaintiff General Track Corporation for a declaration that National Union is obliged to defend and indemnify it under the parties’ policy of insurance, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of declaring that National Union is not obligated to defend or indemnify General Track Corporation with respect to the underlying claim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Having demonstrated that endorsement MS#7 expressly bars coverage for liability stemming from the injury sustained by fourth-party plaintiff General Track Corporation’s employee in the course of his employment, fourth-party defendant insurer National Union was properly found to be under no obligation to defend or indemnify General Track with respect to the claim of that employee. The kind of exclusion here at issue is enforceable under New York law *(see, Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v Insurance Co. of N. Am.,*80 NY2d 992; *Monteleone v Crow Constr. Co.,*242 AD2d 135, *lv denied*92 NY2d 818), and, indeed, this Court has previously granted summary judgment to National Union based upon an exclusion nearly identical to the one that is the subject of the present motion *(see,*
      *408
      *id.).*Contrary to General Track’s argument, the subject policy is not ambiguous by reason of the insurer’s typographical error in referring in the subject endorsement to exclusion “J” instead of “E.” The error notwithstanding, the exclusionary import of the endorsement is clear and, indeed, “susceptible of only one interpretation” *(Goldman & Sons v Hanover Ins. Co.,*80 NY2d 986, 987). We modify only to declare in National Union’s favor *(see, Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334).

We have considered appellant General Track’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.
Amendment to Equity Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.14 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AGREEMENTS 
 This Second Amendment to Stock Appreciation Rights Agreements is entered into this 11th day of December, 2009, by and between DaVita Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Richard K.
Whitney (the “Employee”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee previously entered into five Stock Appreciation
Rights Agreements (each an “SAR Agreement”), dated as of February 14, 2008, February 15, 2008, February 19, 2008, February 20, 2008 and February 21, 2008, respectively (the “Grant Dates”),
copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits 1 through 5, pursuant to the Company’s 2002 Equity Compensation Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, each SAR Agreement was amended by that certain Amendment to Stock Appreciation Rights Agreements dated November 2008, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 6. 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to further amend each SAR Agreement pursuant to Section 10 thereof; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows: 
 Section 2(b) of each SAR Agreement is
amended in its entirety, effective as of the date first written above, to provide as follows: 
 “(b) In the case of the
termination of the Grantee’s employment with the Company (“Severance”), the SAR shall terminate on the Expiration Date.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to Stock Appreciation Rights Agreements as of the date and year first written above. 
  

											
	COMPANY	 		 		 	EMPLOYEE
						
	By	  	 /s/ Kent J. Thiry
	 		 		 	By	  	 /s/ Richard K. Whitney

		  	Kent J. Thiry	 		 		 		  	Richard K. Whitney
		  	Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 By:
    /s/ Roman GregorigRoman GregorigVice President and Principal Financial Officer
of Superfund Capital Management, Inc.,
the general partner of Quadriga Superfund, L.P.
May 14, 2008 E-3
Terri L. ONIZUK, Plaintiff, v. Joseph ONIZUK, Defendant.

No. COA18-461

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 2, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED.