alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5508 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the Federal 

medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the 

Medicaid Program to 75 percent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase 

the Federal medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the Medicaid Program to 75 

percent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Medicaid Reimbursement Act of 2006’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5508 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING THE MEDICAID FEDERAL MEDICAL AS2 SISTANCE PERCENTAGE FOR THE DISTRICT 

3 OF COLUMBIA TO 75 PERCENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(b)(3) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)(3)) is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘70 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘75 percent’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to calendar quarters beginning 

9 on or after October 1, 2006. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Kody O. SAULMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80688

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: September 11, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 23, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied December 18, 2018

Susan Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, P.J., Cynthia L. Martin, and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

Mr. Kody O. Saulmon appeals from the Jackson County Circuit Court judgment denying a 24.035 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Saulmon pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter and was sentenced to ten years in prison, to run consecutively to two concurrent fifteen-year sentences for robbery in the second degree. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the *347judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jacinta Sit, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Oxford Technologies, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.







|                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Jacinta Sit                                               | 
|Jacinta Sit, President                                        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) | 



Date:   August 14, 2008
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5535 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to exclude foreign governmental 

entities from suing under the treble damages portion of its civil RICO 

provisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2006 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to exclude foreign 

governmental entities from suing under the treble damages portion of its civil RICO provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevention of Civil 

5 RICO Abuse Act of 2006’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5535 IH

1 SEC. 2. RICO AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 1964(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘A foreign 

4 governmental entity may not sue under this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5428 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5428

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 202 East Washington Street in Morris, Illinois, as the ``Joshua A. 
                 Terando Morris Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSHUA A. TERANDO MORRIS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 202 East Washington Street in Morris, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Joshua A. Terando Morris Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joshua A. 
Terando Morris Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5428

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 202 East Washington Street in Morris, Illinois, as the ``Joshua A. 
                 Terando Morris Post Office Building''.
```
Javon D. MARSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 106030

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: October 16, 2018

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Amy E. Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Javon March appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dairene International (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Edwin
M. Golstein,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;  and (2) The
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Edwin M. Golstein /s/
Edwin M. Golstein
President and Chief Executive Officer
January 30, 2004


<PAGE>
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Conscious Intention, Inc.
        (the"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Andrew Hamilton,
        President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002,
        that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
              To
                  my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                  of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
 
 
 
 /s/
        Andrew
        Hamilton
 Andrew
        Hamilton
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Duly
        Authorized Officer and Principal
 Financial
        and Accounting Officer
 
 
 
 Date:
        August 18, 2006
1208 AMBASSADOR, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. Mark R. DEVORE, et al., Respondents.

No. ED 106516

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: October 30, 2018

Patrick W. Keefe, 8000 Bonhomme Ave., Ste. 112, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.

Edward W. Corrigan, 41 South Central, 9th Floor, Clayton, MO 63105, Douglas A. Copeland, Stephen A. Thompson, 231 S. Bemiston Ave., Suite 1220, Clayton, MO 63105, for respondents.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*622***ORDER***

PER CURIAM

Plaintiffs 1208 Ambassador LLC, et al., appeal the circuit court's judgment granting Mark Devore's and Webster Groves School District's respective motions to dismiss plaintiffs' petition for damages and declaratory relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We deny Mr. Devore's motion to dismiss this appeal, and affirm the circuit court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
# Fourth Cou rt of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00372

- CV

EAGLE ROCK TIMBER, INC.

,

Appellant

v.

ROCK HARD RENTAL, LLC and Solid Rock Crushing, LLC,

Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court

, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18992B

Honorable M. Rex Emerson , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees Solid Rock Crushing, LLC and Rock Hard Rentals, LLC have filed a motion

for extension of time to file their appellees’ brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellees’ brief is

due April 12, 2022. No further extensions will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have her eunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of February, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.21


 


Fees to be Paid to the Non-Employee Directors


of Sealed Air Corporation (the “Corporation”)


2010


 


Members of the Board of
Directors who are not officers or employees of the Corporation or any
subsidiary of the Corporation (“non-employee directors”) shall be paid the
following directors’ fees in cash, payable quarterly in arrears on or about the
first day of the succeeding calendar quarter, which fees shall be in addition
to retainers payable to non-employee directors under the Sealed Air Corporation
2002 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors:


 


(i)            a fee of One
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500) for each meeting of the Board of
Directors or any committee of the Board of Directors attended by a non-employee
director that is held in person, regardless of whether the non-employee
director attends an in-person meeting by conference telephone or similar
communications equipment;


 


(ii)           a fee of Seven
Hundred Fifty Dollars ($750) for each meeting of the Board of Directors or any
committee of the Board of Directors attended by a non-employee director that is
held by conference telephone or similar communications equipment;


 


(iii)          for each
non-employee director who is a member of the Audit Committee, the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee or the Organization and Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors, a fee of Five Hundred Dollars ($500) per
calendar quarter for serving as a member;


 


(iv)          for each
non-employee director who is designated as chairman of the Audit Committee, a
fee of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per calendar quarter for serving as
chairman;


 


(v)           for each
non-employee director who is designated as chairman of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee or of the Organization and Compensation
Committee, a fee of Five Hundred Dollars ($500) per calendar quarter for
serving as chairman; and


 


(vi)          a fee of Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000) per day for special assignments undertaken by a
non-employee director at the request of the Board or any committee of the Board
or for attending a director education program.


 


The amount of the Annual
Retainer (as defined in the Sealed Air Corporation 2002 Stock Plan for
Non-Employee Directors) to be paid to Non-Employee Directors of the Corporation
who are elected at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is 2,500 shares of
Common Stock plus $45,000 payable in cash unless the Non-Employee Director
elects payment of the cash portion in shares of Common Stock.


 


Under the Sealed Air Corporation Deferred
Compensation Plan for Directors, a non-employee director may elect to defer all
or part of his or her Annual Retainer (or Interim Retainer, if the director
joins the Board at a date other than the date of an Annual Meeting) until the
director retires from the Board. None of the other fees mentioned above is
eligible to be deferred.
EXHIBIT 23.1   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-71077 and 333-106878 on Form S-3, and Nos. 333-73391, 333-106880, 333-106881 and 333-132665 on Form S-8 of our reports, dated February 25, 2011, relating to the financial statements of First Cash Financial Services, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Cash Financial Services, Inc.   /s/ Hein & Associates LLP Dallas, Texas February 25, 2011
#### STATE v. TOM SUDDRETH.

(Filed 19 October, 1949.)

Criminal Xiaw § 57b—

No appeal lies from tlie discretionary refusal of the Superior Court of a motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence.

Appeal by defendant from *Shuford, Special Judge,*at Special May Term, 1949, of Caldwell.

Criminal prosecution upon a bill of indictment charging defendant with tbe murder of one Harry Crisp, Jr.

Verdict: Guilty of manslaughter.

Judgment pronounced at November Term, 1948, of Superior Court of Caldwell County.

On appeal to Supreme Court at Spring Term, 1949, no error was found, — see *ante,*239, 52 S.E. 2d 924. Thereafter at Special May Term, 1949, of Superior Court of said county, defendant filed motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence,- — supporting same by certain affidavits. Tbe judge presiding, after bearing tbe affidavits offered by defendant and tbe argument of bis counsel, denied tbe motion in bis discretion.

From order in accordance therewith defendant appeals to Supreme Court, and assigns error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.*

*W. U. Strickland and Max C. Wilson for defendant, appellant.*

*755Per CuriaM.

Appeal to this Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on tbe ground of newly discovered evidence. See *S. v. Thomas,*227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E. 2d 412; *S. v. Rodgers,*217 N.C. 622, 8 S.E. 2d 927; *S. v. Lea,*203 N.C. 316, 166 S.E. 292, and cases cited therein. See also *S. v. Grass,*223 N.C. 859, 27 S.E. 2d 443.

Hence under the authority of decisions in these cases the appeal in the present case is

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Younglin Du, CEO and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|/s/ Yonglin Du                | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Yonglin Du, CEO and President | 
|(principal executive officer) | 



August 30, 2007
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 8
- 0696 STATE OF MONTANA ,

P la intiff and Appellee , v. SARAH LOUISE CARPENTER, a/k/a SKINNER ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a n extension of ti me, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to an d including August 8 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 1 2020

07/01/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0696
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, J. Russell Porter, Chief Executive Officer of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report), filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 fully complies with the requirements
of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 5, 2009



/s/ J. RUSSELL PORTERJ. Russell PorterChief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

d1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

139482 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139482 

 COA: 283951 

Saginaw CC: 07-028679-FH 

CHARLES LEQUETTE HILL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.