alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 69752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0425; FRL-9952-45-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Texas; Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles, Vehicle Inspection 
and Maintenance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 
revisions to the SIP were submitted in 2015. These revisions are 
related to the implementation of the state's motor vehicle emissions 
Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program. The EPA is proposing to 
approve these revisions pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 7, 
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0425, 
at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to walser.john@epa.gov. For 
additional information on how to submit comments see the detailed 
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located 
in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Walser, (214) 665-7128, 
walser.john@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct 
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this 
action no further activity is contemplated. If the EPA receives 
relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and 
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final 
rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second 
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action 
should do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: September 30, 2016.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2016-24206 Filed 10-6-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**Exhibit
32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION***
 **PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Vineyard National Bancorp (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigneds hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigneds’ best knowledge and belief:

(a) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated
this 10th day of March, 2005
 **Vineyard National Bancorp**
      **("Company")**By:
    /s/ *Norman A. Morales*Norman A. MoralesPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
By:
    */s/ Gordon
      Fong*Gordon
      FongSenior Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer
 ___________________
  ***** ***A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.***
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5603 

To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 

1965, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2006 

Mr. KELLER (for himself, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, 

Mr. TIBERI, Mr. KILDEE, and Mr. HINOJOSA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher 

Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Higher Edu5 cation Extension Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS. 

7 Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act 

8 of 2005 (Public Law 109–81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5603 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘June 30, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep2 tember 30, 2006’’. 

3 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

4 Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Ex5 tension Act of 2005 as amended by this Act, shall be con6 strued to limit or otherwise alter the authorizations of ap7 propriations for, or the durations of, programs contained 

8 in the amendments made by the Higher Education Rec9 onciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–171) to the pro10 visions of the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Tax11 payer-Teacher Protection Act of 2004. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Boyd Douglas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Darrell G. West, Vice President-Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 7 , 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ J. Boyd Douglas                                 
|                   |  |  |  | J. Boyd Douglas                                     
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Darrell G. West                                 
|                   |  |  |  | Darrell G. West                                     
|                   |  |  |  | Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth D. OVERTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105823

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: April 10, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 14, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 14, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018

Kenneth D. Overton, Appellant acting Pro Se, For Plaintiff/Appellant.

Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth D. Overton ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment finding that he was not abandoned by his post-conviction counsel. Movant offers four points on appeal, and alleges that the motion court clearly erred in numerous ways. Specifically, Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in finding he was not abandoned by his post-conviction counsel; in denying Movant's motion to appoint "independent conflict-free" counsel without a hearing; in denying Movant's motion to unseal and disclose the jury list and questionnaires; and in failing to inquire into Movant's request to proceed *pro se.* The motion court did not clearly err in finding that Movant was not abandoned by his post-conviction counsel or in any other way. Movant's *pro se* motion for post-conviction relief was untimely filed, thereby barring him from seeking such relief. We affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
No. 1047.

*Richard W. Barrett, Jack G. Evans*and *Guy Farmer*for petitioner. *Archibald Marison Mull, Jr.*and *Patrick J. McCarthy*for respondent.

#### Procter *&*Gamble Manufacturing Co. *v.*Independent Soap Workers of Sacramento, California.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

h0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144071

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144071 COA: 298859 Wayne CC: 10-001156-FH BRIAN KEITH KEATTS, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 29, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### LEON BROWN v. NATIONAL VENEER CO. et al.

(Filed 7 March, 1928.)

Appeal by defendant, National Veneer Company, from *Harris, J.,*at September Term, 1927, of Pitt.

Motion by nonresident corporation to remove cause to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina for trial. Motion denied, and movant appeals.

*Albion Dunn and Peter B. Hines for plaintiff.*

*P. G. Hording for defendant, National Veneer Company.*

Pee Curiam.

The facts appearing on the present record are so nearly identical in principle with those in *Crisp v. Fibre Co.,*193 N. C., 77, 136 S. E., 238, as to cause the instant case to be controlled by the decision rendered therein. The motion was properly denied.

Affirmed.
Allan Lamont PETTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80111

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: February 27, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 22, 2018

Maleaner R. Harvey, St. Louis for appellant.

Christine K. Lesicko, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division Three: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., and Victor C. Howard and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Boone County, Appellant Allen Petty was convicted of one count of statutory rape in the first degree, in violation of § 566.032, RSMo, for having sexual intercourse with a twelve-year-old female victim in April 2013. After we affirmed Petty's conviction on direct appeal, he filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.15, and his appointed counsel filed an amended motion. The circuit court denied Petty's motion following an evidentiary hearing.

Petty appeals. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a mistrial when the jury indicated that it was unable to reach a verdict after two-and-a-half hours of deliberation, and that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the circuit court erroneously denied a mistrial after one of the jurors was observed crying in reaction to a recording of the child-victim's 911 call.

We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
AUG.21.2015 !0:58AM FA A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

U.S. Depar1ment 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

AdJAi».istration 

AUG 2 1 2011 

Via Facsimile 

Eastern Region 

Office of Regional Counsel 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FAX (202) 366-7536 

Via First Class Mail 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, ~.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

FAX202-267-1293 

NO. 9993 P 2/3 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Room 56 I 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718-553-3272 

Facsimile: 718-995-5699 

Re: In the Matter of GENE HARRISON 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0860 

Case No. 2013EA700064 

Dear Judge Goodwin and Hearing Docket Clerk: 
AUG. 21.2015 !0:59AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 NO. 9993 P 3/3 

This is to confirm that the parties to the above-referenced matter have reached a 

settlement. Therefore, Respondent, Gene Harrison, withdraws his request for a 

hearing and the Complainant, FAA, withdraws its complaint 

Please call me at (718) 553-3272 if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Jeanine C. Gotimer 

Attorney 

For Complainant: 

Je~Gotimer ~ili 

Attorney 

Fo2;spondent: L ?o.-~1 - Gene Harrison 

Respondent 

Date 

Date 
AUG. 212015 10:58AM F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA-7 

To: 

Company: 

Phone: 

Fax: P02-- 3/....u "15~ 

jJ o _j_ dJ-1#7 I M3 

From:~/-~ 

Title: /:l+£~ 

Date: (j.);/ 8Vr~­

Pages: 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

NO. 9993 P 1/3 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza, Rm. 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

1718-553-

F718-995-0099 

E m<Ju: 

This facsimile and the document(s) accompanying this facsimile transmission contain confidential 

information that is legally privileged, The information is intended only for the use of the recipient 

named above If you have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify this office by 

telephone You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking any action in 

reliance on the content of this facsimile is strictly prohibited.
Exhibit 32.1






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tornado Gold International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Earl W. Abbott, President (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



November 15, 2005              By: /s/ Earl W. Abbott
                                  -------------------------------------
                                   Earl W. Abbott
                                   President (principal executive officer)
                                   and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                  108
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0
<PP&E>                                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     0
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            215
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        126
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            38
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          88
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      88
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             88
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          9.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.11A

                           EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION
                                       OF
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the
"Extension") is entered into as of December 7, 1999 by and between California
Coastal Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Employer"), and RAYMOND J.
PACINI ("Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, Executive and Employer have entered into an Employment
Agreement dated as of May 1, 1998 (the "Employment Agreement") through which
Executive has provided various executive capacities to Employer and Employer has
obtained various executive services by Executive; and

         WHEREAS, Employer desires to obtain the benefit of continued service
from Executive by extending the Employment Agreement, and Executive desires to
render continued services to Employer by extending the Employment Agreement
pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Extension;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the
mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows:

         SECTION 1. CONTINUING EFFECTIVENESS OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT. Except to
the extent of any modification made pursuant to the terms of this Extension, the
Employment Agreement shall continue to remain in full force and effect following
the date hereof.

         SECTION 2. EXTENSION OF TERM. Employer and Executive hereby agree to
extend the term of the Employment Agreement until April 30, 2001.

         SECTION 3. STOCK OPTIONS. Executive shall immediately be granted
options ("Stock Options") to purchase 75,000 shares of Employer's common stock
("Option Shares"), at an exercise price of $7.00 per share. The specific terms
and conditions of such Stock Options shall be governed by the Stock Option
Agreement entered into by and between the Company and Executive as of the date
of this Extension.


<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Extension as of the
date first above written.

                                   "EMPLOYER"

                                   CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMUNITIES, INC.

                                   By  /s/ SANDRA G. SCIUTTO
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Sandra G. Sciutto
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                   "EXECUTIVE"

                                   /s/ RAYMOND J. PACINI
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Raymond J. Pacini



                                       -2-
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1252 U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. IWASAKI ELECTRIC COMPANY LTD.,

Defendant!Third-Party PlaintiffAppellant,

v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V., PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORP., and PHILIPS INTERNATIONAL B.V.,

Third-Party Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in case no. 03-CV-0172, Judge P. Kevin Castel.

ON MOTION ORDER U.S. Philips Corporation and Iwasaki Electric Company Ltd. move jointly for extensions of time, until May 26, 2009 for Iwasaki to file its principal brief, until July 10, 2009 for U.S. Philips to file its brief, and until July 24, 2009 for Iwasaki to file its reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.

### FOR THE COURT



# APR 2 2 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly FILED 

### Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

### cc: John M. DiMatteo, Esq. Nicholas Groombridge, Esq. s17 APR 2 2 2009 JRH 

### nukbrui CLERK Date

2009-1252 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Steven Dinetz, as Chief Executive Officer of NextMedia Operating, Inc.(the “**Company**”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the“**Report**”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: May 11, 2005 

 

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THISWRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO NEXTMEDIA OPERATING, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY NEXTMEDIA OPERATING, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.