alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

 

Executive Compensation and Equity Awards

 

At a meeting of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) held on February 28, 2011, the Compensation Committee (a) determined and approved 2010 cash bonus awards and 2011 base salaries and target bonus awards (expressed as a percentage of base salary) for the Company’s “named executive officers” (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission), and (b) granted restricted stock units to the Company’s named executive officers pursuant to the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, as set forth in the table below.  The 2010 cash bonus award and 2011 target bonus award for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer were reviewed and approved by the full Board of Directors at a meeting held on February 28 and March 1, 2011.

 

	
Name and Title
    	
 
    	
2010
   Bonus
   Award
    	
 
    	
2011
   Base
   Salary
    	
 
    	
2011
   Target
   Bonus
   (%)
    	
 
    	
Restricted
   Stock
   Units
    	
 
    
	
Paul L. Berns
   President and Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
363,298
    	
 
    	
$
    	
566,500
    	
 
    	
75
    	
%
    	
345,942
    	
 
    
	
Marc H. Graboyes
   Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
    	
 
    	
$
    	
155,726
    	
 
    	
$
    	
348,493
    	
 
    	
50
    	
%
    	
170,803
    	
 
    
	
Bruce K. Bennett
   Vice President, Pharmaceutical Operations
    	
 
    	
$
    	
76,721
    	
 
    	
$
    	
283,250
    	
 
    	
30
    	
%
    	
43,765
    	
 
    
	
David C. Clark
   Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
66,523
    	
 
    	
$
    	
262,821
    	
 
    	
30
    	
%
    	
53,957
EXHIBIT
      32.1




Written
      Statement of Principal Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      Adopted by


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HouseRaising, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory J.
      Wessling, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition as of September 30, 2007 and results of operations
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of the Company and its
      subsidiaries.




/s/
                Gregory J. Wessling______________________________Gregory
                J. WesslingChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                Officer)





February
      6, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### C. N. Fannin *et al. v.*Board of Education of Barboursville Joint District High School *et al. and*Ethel Ward *et al. v.*Board of Education of Barboursville District, *etc., et al.*

(No. 7421)

(No. 7422)

Submitted August 31, 1932.

Decided September 7, 1932.

*491
      *Philip Simms,*for relators.

*L. W. Blankenship,*for respondents.

Hatcher, President:

These proceedings involve an Act passed by the Legislature in special term on July 29, 1932, (Laws 1932 Ex. Sess. C. 11) limiting the levies of boards of education in 1932 to eighty-five per cent of the levies of 1931.

In one of these cases the petitioners are high school teachers who allege that they entered into written contracts with the board of education in July, 1932, prior to July 29th, to teach school for the regular school term of nine months in 1932-3. In the other ease the petitioners are grade teachers who make a like allegation of contracts entered into for a term of eight months. In both cases it is alleged (with complete fiscal details) that the board proposes to comply with the Act and that if the levy for school purposes be limited to eighty-five per cent of the levy for 1931, there will not be provided a sufficient sum to meet their contracts; and a mandamus is sought to compel the board to lay a levy sufficient therefor. The board makes no denial of the allegations and no defense except by demurrer. As our constitution forbids the passage of any act impairing the obligation of a contract (Article 3, section 4) and as the contracts of the petitioners are allegedly valid, the act in question cannot apply to the levy of the respondent. *Water Co.*v. *Welch,*64 W. Va. 373, 62 S. E. 497.

Mandamus will accordingly issue in each case requiring the board to lay a levy sufficient to meet the contracts of the petitioners if within the limits imposed bylaw other than the Act in question.

*Writs issued.*
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-81825 and 333-149634 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-190307 on Form F-3 of Vodafone Group Plc of our report dated February 27, 2014 relating to the 2013 consolidated financial statements of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Vodafone Group Plc for the year ended March 31, 2016.

 
| /s/ Deloitte &   Touche LLP |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| New York, New York                   |   |
|                                 |   |
| June 10, 2016                   |   |

 

----
#### Fred Scott *v.*State Compensation Commissioner *et al.*

(No. 7140)

Submitted January 13, 1932.

Decided January 26, 1932.

*England <& Ritchie,*for appelant.

*Howard B. Lee,*Attorney General, and *R. Dennis Steed,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

*455Maxwell, Judge:

On tbe 20th of October, 1925, Fred Scott, a coal miner, was injured by a fall of slate in a coal mine in Fayette County while in the course of his employment by Cannelton Coal *&*Coke Company, a subscriber to the Workmen’s Compensation Fund. He was first awarded compensation on the basis of twenty per centum partial permanent disability. The rating was later increased to thirty percentum, and again fifty per centum. Payments under the last rating terminated August 27, 1929. Subsequent to said date, claimant asserted his right to compensation on the basis of total permanent disability. The case was reopened and further evidence was taken. Thereafter, by order of August 10, 1931, the commisioner enlarged the rating of disability to sixty-five per centum, the payments representing such increase covering a period of sixty weeks, beginning July 1, 1931, and expiring August 24, 1932. This finding negatives the petitioner’s claim to a rating on the basis of total- permanent disability.

Peitioner is aggrieved because the commissioner declined to give him a rating* of total permanent disability. Objection to the commissioner’s finding* was promptly made by claimant, and soon thereafter an appeal was awarded by one of the judges of this Court.

The commissioner takes the position that his said last finding does not go to the basis of claimant’s right and is not appealable; therefore that it was not encumbent upon the commissioner to grant petitioner a further hearing following the latter’s objection to the said last finding. A claimant is entitled to appeal to this Court only with reference to matters which go to the basis of his claim. Code 1931, 23-5-1; *Meeks*v. *Compensation Commissioner,*108 W. Va. 68, 150 S. E. 230; *Conovas*v. *Commissioner,*108 W. Va. 397, 151 S. E. 309; *Murasky*v. *Commissioner,*109 W. Va. 218, 153 S. E. 509; *Enyart*v. *Commissioner,*109 W. Va. 613, 155 S. E. 913.

Percentages of disability are mere administrative matters of which the commissioner has continuing jurisdiction under Code 1931, 23-4-16; they do not go to the basis of claimant’s right to receive compensation from the Workmen’s Compensation Fund and therefore are not appealable. Cases *supra.**456In this ease the continuing jurisdiction of the commissioner is being exercised, as evidenced by the several orders above mentioned. At the expiration of the period through which compensation will be paid under the enlargement of disability rating of August 10, 1931, such further order can be made by the commissioner as the case may then require.

It appearing under this view that the commissioner’s said finding of August 10, 1931, did not involve a matter going to the basis of claimant’s right, it follows that a hearing as required by Code 1931, 23-5-1, was properly refused.

We affirm the commissioner.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1



            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Younglin Du, CEO
and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Yonglin Du
------------------------------
Younglin Du, CEO and President

December 12, 2006
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Matthew LUCKINBILL, Appellant.

WD 80287

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: April 24, 2018

Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent

Jedd C. Schneider, for Appellant

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge *330***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

James Luckinbill appeals his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Pettis County. Luckinbill argues that the trial court erred in refusing to tender his proposed self-defense instruction to the jury. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
1 

## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00006

- C V

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C.R. AND B.B.N.N., CHILDREN

----------

FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

On June 18, 2010, we notified appellant K.D.R. that her brief had not been

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App.

P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss her appeal for want of prosecution unless

appellan t or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten

days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3. We have not received any response. 2

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 Appellant’s counsel previously informed this court by letter that K.D.R. did2

Because appellant = s brief for K.D.R. has not been file d, we dismiss her

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 15, 2010

not wish to pursue the appeal but that counsel would not be filing a motion to

dismiss or a brief for K.D.R. The letter says it was copied to “Client.”
<page>           EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		May 17, 2004
exv10w1









Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     This Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) by and between The
Meridian Resource Corporation, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), and Paul D. Ching (the
“Executive”) is made and entered into February 22, 2010, but effective as of December 31, 2009.



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Executive is employed by the Company in the capacity of President and Chief
Executive Officer under an Employment Agreement, dated effective as of December 30, 2008, as
amended by the Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated June 4, 2009 (as so amended, the
“Employment Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company wish to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance
with the provisions of this Amendment.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and for other
good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:



     1. Section 1.3 of the Employment Agreement. Section 1.3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
amended and restated to provide as follows:



     “1.3 TERM. This Agreement shall become effective as of December 30, 2008 (the “Effective
Date”) and shall continue in force and effect until March 31, 2010 unless sooner terminated as
provided in Section 2.1 hereof. This Agreement may only be renewed or extended by written agreement
executed by the Company and the Executive pursuant to mutually acceptable terms and conditions.”



     2. Other Terms of the Employment Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment,
all other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. All references
in the Agreement to “this Agreement” shall be read as references to the Employment Agreement, as
amended by this Amendment, but references to the date of the Employment Agreement shall remain
references to December 30, 2008.



     3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in separate
counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all such
counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Each counterpart may consist
of a number of copies hereof each signed by less than all, but together signed by all of the
parties hereto.



     4 Choice of Law. The parties intend that the laws of the State of Texas shall govern the
validity of this Amendment, the construction of its terms and the interpretation of the rights and
duties of the parties hereto, without regard to conflict of laws provisions.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on February 22, 2010, effective
as of December 31, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	The Meridian Resource Corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Lloyd DeLano
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Lloyd DeLano 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President 	 
	 
	 	Executive

 	 
	 	/s/ Paul D. Ching
 	 
	 	Paul D. Ching 	 
	 	 	 
	 




2
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the amendment no. 1 to this quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Don Stricklin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ L. Don Stricklin                 
|L. Don Stricklin                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|October 11, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 49 (Monday, March 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11088-11089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XO05


Climate and Sustainability Conference

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and 
the International Trade Administration will host a seminar on April 1, 
2009 at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

[[Page 11089]]

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, in Room 4830. The seminar will 
present climate data, services, and programs available from the U.S. 
Department of Commerce for U.S. companies coming to terms with climate 
variability. The agenda will feature strategies for sustainability, 
competitiveness, and networking for the business community.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 
recess at 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution NW, Washington 
DC 20230, Room 4830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To register, please email your name, 
company name, contact information including email and phone number to:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#521322203b3e637c113d3c343720373c3137123f333b3e7c363d317c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ce8fbebca7a2ffe08da1a0a8abbcaba0adab8ea3afa7a2e0aaa1ade0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a>. For further information, phone Ellen 
Bohon, Office of Energy and Environmental Technologies Industries 
(OEEI), International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce 
at (202) 482-0359.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to (202) 482-0359.

    Dated: March 10, 2009.
Captain Todd Stiles,
Executive Director, Office of the Deputy Under Secretary, National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-5640 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                   ------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Betsy Henley-Cohn and John S.
Tomac, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, of
BIW Limited (the "issuer"), do each hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q
accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.


/s/ Betsy Henley-Cohn
--------------------------
Betsy Henley-Cohn
Chairwoman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
BIW Limited

November 14, 2007


/s/ John S. Tomac
--------------------------
John S. Tomac
President and Treasurer
(chief financial officer)
BIW Limited

November 14, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Syniverse Holdings, Inc.
and Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year December 31, 2004 (the Report), I, Raymond L. Lawless, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 12, 2005 |  | /s/ RAYMOND L. LAWLESS 
|                    |  | Raymond L. Lawless     
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer



The above
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Order entered August 29 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01710

- CR

ERRINGTON CHARLES HA TCH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Tri al Court Cause No. F11

- 59284

- K



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On August 26 , 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record has not been filed. On August 27, 2014, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefo re, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the August 26, 2014 order

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE