alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

                                MISSION BANCORP


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  this Quarterly Report of Form of 10-QSB of Mission Bancorp
(the  "Company")  for  the period ended June 30, 2002, I, Craig Swenson, CFO, of
the  Company,  hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   This  Periodic  Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
          or  78o  (d));  and
     2.   The  information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations  of  the  Company.



Dated:  August  16,  2002             /s/  Craig  Swenson
                                      -------------------
                                      Craig Swenson, CFO
                                      Mission Bancorp


<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register: September 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 169)]
[Notices]               
[Page 53732]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01se10-117]                         

[[Page 53732]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7141]

 
In the Matter of the Designation of Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan 
(TTP) also known as Tehrik-I-Taliban Pakistan also known as Tehrik-e-
Taliban also known as Pakistani Taliban also known as Tehreek-e-Taliban 
as a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant to Section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to 
find that the relevant circumstances described in section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (hereinafter ``INA'') (8 
U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP), 
also known as Tehrik-I-Taliban Pakistan, also known as Tehrik-e-
Taliban, also known as Pakistani Taliban, also known as Tehreek-e-
Taliban.
    Therefore, I hereby designate the aforementioned organization and 
its aliases as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 
of the INA.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 12, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-21854 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Date: June 27, 2014

From: David Cole, EPA , Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards To: Docket # EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0734 Subject: Catalyst Equivalency On June 26 , 2014, industry representatives , at their request, met by con ference call with EPA representatives. The meeting focused on Applied Ceramics elaborating on their May 1, 2014 comments submitted to the proposed rulemaking docket, regarding EPA procedures for determining catalyst equivalency . No new information was presented. Attending the c onference call were — Applied Ceramics: Allen Carroll, Chris Mitchell Applied Catalysts: Bob Gulotty, Lee Mitchell EPA/Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Gil Wood, David Cole EPA/Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance: Julius Banks, Rafael Sanchez
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130414 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

EVELYN WHITE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130414 

 COA: 264622 

WCAC: 04-000327 

CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY 

SPECIALISTS and ACCIDENT FUND 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration 

as on leave granted. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

t0524 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 31, 2006 

Clerk
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Britney Nicole Dokey, * From the 350th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 10918-D.

Vs. No. 11-14-00307-CR * September 3, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (09-023)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing. 

# SUMMARY:

Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing. 

# DATES:

March 11, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bryan A. Geurts, Patent Counsel, Goddard Space Flight Center, Mail Code 140.1, Greenbelt, MD 20771-0001; telephone (301) 286-7351; fax (301) 286-9502. 

*NASA Case No. GSC-15377-1:*                         Advanced Adhesive Bond Shape Tailoring for Large Composite Primary Structures Subjected to Cryogenic and Ambient Loading Environments;                     

*NASA Case No. GSC-15431-1:*                         A Two-Axis Direct Fluid Shear Stress Sensor.                     

Dated: March 4, 2009. 

Richard W. Sherman, 

Deputy General Counsel.

 [FR Doc. E9-5092 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TierOne Corporation (Company), hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
               September 30, 2006 (Report) fully complies with the
requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)                or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:   November 2, 2006 | By:  /s/ Gilbert G. Lundstrom  
|------------------------ | -------------------------------
|                         | Gilbert G. Lundstrom           
|                         | Chairman of the Board and Chief
|                         | Executive Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D22-0391

_____________________________

WILLIAM GUILFORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Clay County.

Timothy R. Collins, Judge.

September 9, 2022

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

William Guilford, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
----

----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                  13(a) or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Quarterly                  Report. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |   |                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  April 3, 2007 |   |                                                                                                          |
|                                 | By:    | /s/                  *Andrew                  Hamilton         * |
|                                 |   | Andrew                  Hamilton                                                                              |
|                                 |   | Chief                  Executive Officer                                                                      |

----
exh4_1.htm


    EXHIBIT
4.1(a)

    


    FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE

    RIGHTS
AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JUNE 14, 2000

    BETWEEN
FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC.

    AND
FLEET NATIONAL BANK, RIGHTS AGENT

    


    February
24, 2010

    


    This Amendment is adopted by FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC.,
(the “Company”), a Texas Corporation, having its principal office in
Dallas, Texas

    


    RECITALS:

    WHEREAS, the Board has
previously approved the Rights Agreement dated as of June 14, 2000, between
Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. and Fleet National Bank (the “Rights
Agreement”); and

    


    WHEREAS, the Company has
determined it to be desirable to adopt such amendment: and

    


    WHEREAS, the Company has the
power to amend the Rights Agreement pursuant to Section 27 (iii) of the Rights
Agreement;

    


    NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to
Section 27 (iii) of the Rights Agreement, the Rights Agreement is hereby amended
as follows, effective as specifically stated herein:

    


    Section
1 (u) of the Rights agreement shall be amended, effective February 24, 2010, to
be and read a follows:

    


    (u)  “Final Expiration Date”
shall mean June 13, 2013

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FROZEN FOOD
EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC. has caused this First Amendment to be executed
this 24th day of February ,2010, effective as specifically stated herein, by the
undersigned duly appointed and authorized officer.

     

                             FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS
INDUSTRIES, INC.

    


                                By: /s/Stoney M. Stubbs,
Jr.

                                   Name: Stoney M. Stubbs,
Jr

                                    Title:
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Weston Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Isaacs K. Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Isaacs K. Li
-------------------------------------
Isaacs K. Li, Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 25, 2004
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 May 12, 2004 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

Honorable James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter *

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 01-14872 & 01-15080

 

D. C. Docket Nos. 99-00026-CR & 

01-00032-CR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAY SCOTT BALLINGER, 

 

 Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------------

 Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia

--------------------------

(Opinion November 21, 2002, 312 F.3d 1264, 11 Cir. 2002) th

(May 12, 2004)

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA,

BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit

Judges.

*

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the
suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active

service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc.

The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

2
Compensation Arrangements for the Named Executive Officers



 EXHIBIT 10 (l) 
 COMPUTER TASK GROUP, INCORPORATED 
 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE NAMED EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS 
 Set forth below is a summary of the annual and incentive compensation paid by Computer Task Group, Incorporated (the Company) to its named
executives (defined in Regulation S-K Item 402(a)(3)) in their current positions as of the date of the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. All of the Company’s executive
officers are at-will employees whose compensation and employment status may be changed at any time at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, subject only to the terms of employment agreements, as applicable, between the Company and
these executive officers. 
 Effective January 1, 2010, the named executive officers are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries in
their current positions: 
  

				
	 	  	Current Annual Salary
	 James R. Boldt
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	450,000
		
	 Brendan M. Harrington
 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	237,000
		
	 Michael J. Colson
 Senior Vice President, Solutions
	  	$	246,000
		
	 Filip J.L. Gyde (1)
 Senior Vice President, General Manager, CTG Europe
	  	$	304,993
		
	 Arthur W. Crumlish
 Senior Vice President and General Manager, Strategic Staffing Solutions
	  	$	239,000

 Executive officers are also eligible to receive incentive
compensation each year primarily based upon the achievement of certain targets. These targets may include specific levels of revenue growth, gross profit, operating income or earnings per share. Bonuses were awarded to the named executives for 2009
as follows: 
  

				
	 	  	2009 Bonus
	 James R. Boldt
	  	$	0
	 Brendan M. Harrington
	  	$	0
	 Michael J. Colson
	  	$	71,112
	 Filip J.L. Gyde
	  	$	0
	 Arthur W. Crumlish
	  	$	0

  

	(1)	Mr. Gyde is paid in Euros. This amount represents his base pay of 212,257 Euros translated into U.S. dollars at the January 1, 2010 exchange rate.


  

 70
exv10w9








Exhibit 10.9




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR

J. MICHAEL SCHROEDER




     This is a SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated July 2, 2008, between Great Wolf
Resorts, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Employer”) and J. Michael Schroeder, a natural person
resident of the State of Wisconsin as of the date hereof (“Employee”), the terms and conditions of
which are as follows:



     1. Employer and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of December 13, 2004,
as modified by a First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated May 28, 2008 (the “Original
Agreement”).



     2. Section 4.2(f)(6)(A)(2) of the Original Agreement is hereby modified by deleting the words
“one hundred twenty (120) day period” and replacing them with “one hundred thirty (130) day
period.”



     3. All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed.



     Employer
and Employee have hereby executed this SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT as of
the date above first written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Employer:   	 	Employee: 	 	 
	GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC.	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/ 	 	 	 	/s/
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	 	 	J. Michael Schroeder	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
#### State of West Virginia *v.*Webb Holesapple

(CC 521)

Submitted January 15, 1935.

Decided January 22, 1935.

*Homer A. Holt,*Attorney General, and *Kenneth E. Hines,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

*M. F. Matheny,*for defendant.

*20Woods, Judge:

Webb Holesapple upon arraignment before tbe intermediate court of Kanawha county on a charge of the larceny of two diamond bracelets of the value of $14,000, tendered and filed a special plea, in which he set up a former acquittal in the circuit court of Greenbrier county of the alleged offense, as evidenced by a certified copy of the latter court’s final order, incorporated in said plea. A demurrer to the special plea was overruled. Thereupon the State, according to the order of the intermediate court, filed its replication to said plea and said court *‘ ‘*after hearing argument of counsel upon said special plea and upon said replication,” found “that the defendant, Webb Holesapple, should not be further prosecuted * * * upon the indictment now pending against him for the reason that he was formerly acquitted for the same offense in the circuit court of Greenbrier county, it having been stipulated * * * that the property alleged to have been stolen in each indictment is one and the same property.” This order recited further that, at the State’s request, the correctness of the court’s rulings on the demurrer to the special plea, and “its decision in finding for the defendant on said plea” were thereby certified to the circuit court. The latter, after affirming the action of the intermediate court, certified the questions to this Court.

Is this matter reviewable on certificate? It will be noted that the proceeding did not stop with the overruling of the demurrer to the special plea. The State filed a special replication, certain facts were stipulated, and the court, after hearing counsel thereon, made a specific finding that the defendant had been formerly acquitted in Greenbrier county of the offense for which he was being held in Kanawha county, and should not be further prosecuted therefor. This action of the court was more than a mere expression on the sufficiency of a pleading — that if the defendant established the facts set up in his plea he may be entitled to be discharged and go without day. It was a finding of fact — an adjudication — on the issues raised. This Court has repeatedly held that it is without jurisdiction to review on certificate a ruling on a pleading, *21where the principles of the case have been adjudicated. *Central Trust Co. v. Green,*98 W. Va. 200, 127 S. E. 32; *Jones*v. *Main Island Creek Coal Co.,*82 W. Va. 506, 96 S. E. 797.

The proceeding is accordingly dismissed as improvidently docketed.

*Dismissed.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Annual Report of First Cash Financial Services,  Inc.
 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as  filed
 with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
 "Report"), we, J. Alan Barron and  R. Douglas Orr each certify, pursuant  to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-
 Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of the Company.


 Date:  March 10, 2005

 /s/ J. Alan Barron
 ------------------
 J. Alan Barron
 Chief Executive Officer

 /s/ R. Douglas Orr
 ------------------
 R. Douglas Orr
 Chief Financial Officer