alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 4`h, 2010 

To: Lisa P. Jackson 

Administrator 

United States Environment Protection Agency 

Fr: John. C. Higbie Jr. 

Mary Jane Higbie 

Family Farm Owners 

Colfax, Wis. 

Dear Ms. Jackson, 

DAr 

2010 NOV -9 AM I I- 34 

OF .- T~ ~ ~E EXE~UTiVE S~CREiAy;hT 

We are contacting you today to ask you to reconsider the National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines rule. NRECA filed a 

petition in your office in late October, and we support their petition . 

We own and run a small family farm in Dunn County, Wis. In 2003 we purchased a 220 kW back 

up generator to make sure our farm, Windmill Dairy, could continue to operate during extended 

power outages . A bonus to purchasing the generator was being able to participate in Dunn Energy 

Cooperative's load control program . This program, using my generator when they need to 

decrease demand on the grid, saves us nearly $7,600 a year. In this economy, any little bit helps, 

but $7,600 helps a lot . 

The rules your agency are trying to start will take away that peak alert rate my Cooperative can 

offer. That means a $7,600 out of our pocket. As a self-employed farmer, that's hard to swallow. 

We'd like your agency to reconsider not allowing peak shaving controls of generators like mine 

within the proposed 100 hour limits . The request NRECA filed does not ask for more hours of 

operation; just to include peak shaving use within the 100 hour limit. Since we're a part of a 

Cooperative we see the savings and revenue from this type of arrangement, not them. Plus, we are 

helping to reduce energy demand during the peak times. This is a significant savings to our small 

business . 

John C. Higbie Jr . 

Mary Jane Higbie 

Colfax, Wisconsin 
t ~ ~° 'r' 

o 

~ w r 

:.... 

o 

, 

C t5 

m ~> PRESORTED 

FlRS'1' - CLASS 

n * 

+».... 

~ o ° N v~~4 

p C~, 

O N K ' 

0 co ' 

N N 3' 

z 

< 0,00 

P, 

N 

v O ~~ 

O 

a O : 

~ 

m 

, N ~
Nathan POLITTE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

ED 106035

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: June 5, 2018

Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Mary Highland Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

*457Nathan Politte appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); *Little v. State*, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment and order pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 !
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 "
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 #
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 %
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 &
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 '
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 (
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 )
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 !
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 "
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 #
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 %
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 &
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 '
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 (
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! )
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 !
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! !
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! "
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! #
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! $
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! %
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! &
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! '
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! (
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " )
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 "
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " !
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " "
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " #
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " $
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " %
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " &
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " '
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " (
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # )
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 #
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # !
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # "
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # #
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # $
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # %
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # &
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # '
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # (
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $ )
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $

2 / + )'(/ 2 / 7 1 7 8 7 9 : / ( 8
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $ !

; /&<= >/ ? @ % A B ? C ? @ A D E F C ? B F G C A H A C C I D ? @ %

C I F I @ @ ? C E E J K @ I F E F J @ % L M 6 L I C N . A B K ? @ ? @ .

@ A D E F % G I O G . . E G I N % @ I I P J E . A E Q Q ? . A @ H E F ? O I
IN RE: C.J.

159A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 11, 2019

J. Lee Gilliam, Assistant Parent Defender.

Richard Allen Penley, Attorney at Law.

Michelle F. Lynch, GAL Appellate Counsel.

Wendy C. Sotolongo, Parent Defender.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 11th of July 2019 by Respondent-Mother:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of July 2019."

Respondent-Mother shall have up to and including the 5th day of August 2019 to file and serve his/ her brief with this Court.
#### Frances Bey, Appellant, v Mauro A. Maratea, Respondent. Olufemi Falade, Intervenor-Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 608]

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of an option to purchase real property, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated January 31, 2003, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the intervenor Olufemi Falade.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint where she failed to establish that she exercised her option to purchase the subject building from the defendant *714Mauro Maratea in accordance with the terms of the lease *(see Mohring Enters. v HSBC Bank USA,*291 AD2d 385 [2002]; *Willis v Ronan,*249 AD2d 299, 300 [1998]; *cf. Kaplan v Lippman,*75 NY2d 320, 325 [1990]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.
CHAVEZ, et al. v. CARMICHAEL

437PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 6, 2019

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Carmichael, Irwin (Sheriff).

Sejal Zota, Attorney at Law, W. Rob Heroy, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Chavez, Carlos, et al.

Erez Reuveni, Attorney at Law, Joshua S. Press, Attorney at Law, Gill P. Beck, Attorney at Law, for United States.

Deborah Weissman, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Law Scholars and National Immigrant Justice Center.

Raul A. Pinto, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Justice Center.

Irena Como, Attorney at Law, for ACLU, et al.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for The State of North Carolina.

*742The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of June 2019 by ACLU of NC to admit Daniel Galindo Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of June 2019."
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Wilson Cheng, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
      of
      Directors and Treasurer of BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC. (the "Company"), DOES
      HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.
      The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28,
      2007 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 16th
      day of April ,
      2007.








**/s/ Wilson Cheng**


Wilson
      Cheng


CEO,
      Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC. and will be retained by BESTWAY COACH EXPRESS INC.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Don Stricklin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



/s/ L. Don StricklinL. Don StricklinPresident and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 11, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0549 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MATTHEW JASON WELCH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 27 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 20 2023

11/20/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0549
EXHIBIT 32




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jacinta Sit, President and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
        of the Company.


By: /s/ Jacinta Sit
------------------------------
Jacinta Sit, President & CFO

November 20, 2003
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2005

/s/ Barry LamperdBarry Lamperd
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10002

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BRANDON CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:08-CR-226-1

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Brandon Christopher Johnson has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Johnson has filed a response. Our independent

review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Johnson’s response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 26, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10002 Document: 00511274415 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
Second Amendment to 401(k) Savings and Profit Sharing Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 OF 
 ENTEGRIS, INC. 
 401(k) SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN 
 (2005 Restatement) 
 WHEREAS, Entegris, Inc. (the “Principal Sponsor”) has heretofore established and maintains a 401(k) and profit sharing plan which
was amended and restated in a document effective August 5, 2005, and entitled “ENTEGRIS, INC. 401(k) SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN, (2005 Restatement),” as amended (collectively, the “Plan Statement”); and 
 WHEREAS, The Principal Sponsor has reserved to itself the power to make further amendments of the Plan Statement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, The Plan Statement is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. ELIGIBILITY SERVICE FOR MYKROLIS EMPLOYEES. Effective August 6, 2005, Schedule I to the Plan Statement is hereby amended and replaced by the Schedule I attached hereto. 
 SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan Statement shall continue in full force and effect. 







 SCHEDULE I 
 CREDITING OF PRIOR SERVICE 
 As of August 6, 2005

 All Hours of Service with the following entities and their predecessors prior to the time such entities became Affiliates of the Principal
Sponsor shall be credited for Eligibility Service and Vesting Service purposes under this Plan in accordance with the rules under this Plan as if such Hours of Service had been credited with the Principal Sponsor. 
  

	1.	Aeronex Incorporated 

  

	2.	Extraction Systems, Inc. 

  

	3.	Millipore Corporation 

  

	4.	Mykrolis Corporation. Notwithstanding any provision in Section 2.2 to the contrary, each employee who is actively employed by Mykrolis Corporation as of
August 6, 2005, shall become a Participant as of the first payroll period coincident with or next following August 6, 2005, with respect to discretionary profit sharing contributions made pursuant to Section 3.4 if such employee is
then in Recognized Employment. 

  

 SI-I
Exhibit 10.55


 


Amendment to the 1993 Stock Option Plan, as Amended &
Restated, of Biovail Corporation dated March 14, 2007


 


THIS AMENDMENT, effective March 14,
2007, is made to the 1993 Stock Option Plan, as Amended & Restated, of
Biovail Corporation, as amended (the “1993 Stock Option Plan”).


 


WHEREAS, on March 14, 2007, the Board of
Directors of Biovail Corporation approved certain amendments to the
transferability provisions of the 1993 Stock Option Plan, which amendments did
not require shareholder approval;


 


NOW THEREFORE the 1993 Stock Option Plan is
hereby amended as follows:


 


1.               Section 7(h) is
hereby amended by inserting, at the end of that section, immediately following
the word “Optionee”, the following:


 


“; provided that no such transfer may occur
where such transfer is to be made for consideration.”.
exv10w117






Exhibit 10.117




Select Medical Corporation

4714 Gettysburg Road

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055




March 8, 2011



Michael E. Tarvin, Esq.

Select Medical Corporation

4714 Gettysburg Road

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055



RE: Fourth Amendment to the Agreement in the Event of a Change of Control of SMC



Dear Mr. Tarvin:




     The following confirms our desire to amend the letter agreement, dated as of March 1, 2000
between you and Select Medical Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as amended on
February 23, 2001, February 24, 2005 and December 18, 2008 (the “Letter Agreement”).



     In consideration of your past and continued service to the Company and the mutual covenants
and agreements contained in this fourth amendment to the Letter Agreement (the “Amendment”), the
Company and you hereby agree, intending to be legally bound, as follows:


1. Section 3(a)(iii) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to
read as follows and all references to Section 3(a)(iii) in the Letter Agreement are hereby deleted:




     “(iii) Intentionally Omitted.”


2. Section 5(d) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as
follows:





“(d) As a condition to payment of any amount required under Section 1 hereof, you
shall deliver to the Company a general release of liability of the Company and its
officers and directors in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Company, such that
such release is effective, with all revocation periods having expired unexercised,
by no later than the (i) 60th day after such termination, in the event
of a Post-Change of Control Termination and (ii) first business day of the seventh
month following such termination, in the event of a Pre-Change of Control
Termination.”


3. Section 5(g) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended to add the following to the end thereof:





“This Agreement is intended to comply with Code Section 409A (to the extent
applicable) and the parties hereto agree to interpret, apply and administer this
Agreement in the least restrictive manner necessary to comply therewith and
without resulting in any increase in the amounts owed hereunder by the Company.”



 









 




4. Except as amended hereby, the Letter Agreement shall continue in effect in accordance with its
terms.




     Please indicate your acceptance of the above Amendment by signing below in the space
indicated.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	Very Truly Yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION, a 

Delaware Corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Robert A. Ortenzio
 

Name: Robert A. Ortenzio
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Michael E. Tarvin	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Michael E. Tarvin
----

| Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP |
|-----------------------------------|

| Suite 2000 |
|------------|

| National Bank Tower |
|---------------------|

| 600, De La Gauchetière Street West |
|-----------------------------------------|

| Montréal (Québec) H3B 4L8 |
|-------------------------------------|

| Téléphone / Telephone : (514) 878-2691 |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| Télécopieur / Facsimile : (514) 878-2127 |
|----------------------------------------------------|

| www.rcgt.com |
|--------------|

| CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
|----------------------------------------------------------|

| To the Board of Directors of Copernic Inc. |
|--------------------------------------------|

| s/s Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP |
|---------------------------------------|

| Chartered Accountants |
|-----------------------|

| Montreal, Canada |
|------------------|

| March 26, 2010 |
|----------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Texas United Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Wilkinson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.



/s/ Jeffrey A. WilkinsonJeffrey A. WilkinsonExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2005