alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB/A Amended Quarterly Report of World Health
Alternatives, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended August 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

January 20, 2003

By: /s/ Edward G. Siceloff
Edward G. Siceloff, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
and Principal Accounting Officer
```
Exhibit 15.2
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-81825 and
333-149634 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-144978 on Form F-3 of Vodafone Group
Plc, of our report dated February 22, 2008 (June 6, 2008 as to Note 16 and the 6th
and 7th paragraphs of Note 15) (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006 and Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
on January 1, 2007) relating to the consolidated financial statements of Cellco Partnership
d/b/a Verizon Wireless appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Vodafone Group Plc for
the year ended March 31, 2008.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York June
6, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5518 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5518

    To repeal the Medicare cost containment provisions contained in 
      subtitle A of title VIII of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 
              Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2006

  Mr. Wexler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To repeal the Medicare cost containment provisions contained in 
      subtitle A of title VIII of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 
              Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MEDICARE COST CONTAINMENT PROVISIONS.

    Subtitle A of title VIII of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 
Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173) is 
repealed and the provisions of law amended by such subtitle are 
restored as if such subtitle had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
 333-71077 and 333-106878 on Form S-3,  and  Nos. 333-73391, 333-106880, 333-
 106881 and 333-132665  on Form  S-8 of our  reports,  dated  March 14, 2007,
 relating to the financial statements of First Cash Financial Services, Inc.,
 and to management's  report on the  effectiveness of  internal control  over
 financial reporting, appearing in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K  of First
 Cash Financial Services, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2006.



 Hein & Associates LLP
 Dallas, Texas
 March 14, 2007
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of our report dated March 9, 2007 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedules of Allstate Life Insurance Company
of New York (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to a change in method of accounting for certain
nontraditional long-duration contracts and separate accounts in 2004), appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New
York for the year ended December 31, 2006.

FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT NOS.   FORM N-4 REGISTRATION STATEMENT NOS.
------------------------------------   ------------------------------------
             333-58512                               033-65381
             333-100029                              333-68344
                                                     333-81970
                                                     333-94785


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
------------------------------
Chicago, Illinois
March 9, 2007
Ruth BOWLIN, Deceased, Jimmy D. Bowlin, Personal Representative for the Estate of Ruth Bowlin, Appellant, v. Michael BOWLIN, Respondent.

WD 81147

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: August 7, 2018

John F. Burns, St. Joseph, MO, for appellant.

Robert E. Sundell, Maryville, MO, for respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Ruth Bowlin ("Ruth") is appealing the judgment from the Circuit Court of Nodaway County, Missouri finding in favor of her grandson, Michael Bowlin ("Michael"). Ruth brought this action against Michael in equity to set aside a deed to certain real estate transferring property from Ruth to Michael. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 53 (Friday, March 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11995-11996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5783]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35227]

Middletown and New Jersey Railroad, LLC--Acquisition and 
Operation Exemption--Middletown & New Jersey Railway Co., Inc.

    Middletown and New Jersey Railroad, LLC (Middletown), a noncarrier, 
has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to 
acquire and operate 6.5 miles of rail line owned by Middletown & New 
Jersey Railway Co., Inc., between milepost 0.0 at Middletown, NY, and 
milepost 6.5 at Slate Hill, NY.
    This transaction is related to a concurrently filed verified notice 
of exemption in STB Finance Docket No. 35228, Regional Rail, LLC.--
Continuance in Control Exemption--Middletown and New Jersey Railroad, 
LLC., wherein Regional Rail, LLC seeks to continue in control of 
Middletown, upon Middletown becoming a Class III rail carrier.
    The transaction is expected to be consummated on or shortly after 
April 5, 2009 (the effective date of the exemption).
    Middletown certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result 
of the transaction will not result in its becoming a Class II or Class 
I rail carrier and further certifies that its projected annual revenue 
will not exceed $5 million.
    Pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 
No. 110-161, Sec.  193, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007), nothing in this decision 
authorizes the following activities at any

[[Page 11996]]

solid waste rail transfer facility: collecting, storing or transferring 
solid waste outside of its original shipping container; or separating 
or processing solid waste (including baling, crushing, compacting and 
shredding). The term ``solid waste'' is defined in section 1004 of the 
Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6903.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than March 27, 
2009 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 35227, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Karl Morell, 1455 F Street, 
NW., Suite 225, Washington, DC 20005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: March 12, 2009.

    By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-5783 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A2030. RONALD AVEY v. THE STATE.

In March 2019, Ronald Avey pleaded guilty to child molestation and was

sentenced to 30 years with 12 to serve in prison. Avey subsequently filed a motion

for out-of-time appeal, which the trial court denied on November 19, 2019. In

December 2019, Avey filed a motion seeking to amend the motion for out-of-time

appeal, which the trial court denied as moot on in January 2020. Avey filed a motion

to reconsider, which the trial court denied in March 2020. Avey then filed a notice of

appeal on March 30, 2020, seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying his

motion for out-of-time appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

1

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial

court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing

of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer appellate jurisdiction on this

Court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). We note that

Avey’s notice of appeal was filed less than 30 days after the denial of his motion for

reconsideration, but his appeal is still untimely. That is because a motion for

reconsideration does not extend the time for filing an appellate challenge to an

appealable order, and the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not appealable in

its own right. See State v. White, 282 Ga. 859, 860 (1) (655 SE2d 575) (2008); see

also State v. Lynch, 286 Ga. 98, 102 (2) (686 SE2d 244) (2009); Savage v. Newsome,

173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). Consequently, the denial of Avey’s

1

In January 2020, Avey filed a motion for appointment of counsel.That motion

appears to remain pending in the trial court.

August 11, 2020
motion for reconsideration is not appealable, and his notice of appeal – filed 132 days

after entry of the order denying his motion for out-of-time appeal – is untimely. See

OCGA § 5-6-38 (a); Lynch, 286 Ga. at 102 (2); White, 282 Ga. at 860 (1); Savage,

173 Ga. App. at 271. We therefore lack jurisdiction over this untimely appeal, which

is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/11/2020
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,280]


Eaton Corporation, Mentor, OH; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 18, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Eaton Corporation, Mentor, Ohio.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of February 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-5047 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 10.19



 EXHIBIT 10.19 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO 

ALLERGAN, INC. 
 EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 
 (RESTATED 2008) 

The ALLERGAN, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	1.	 Effective January 1, 2009, Section 2.16 is hereby amended by adding to the end thereof the following flush paragraph:



 “Effective January 1, 2009, solely to the extent required by Code Section 414(u)(12), the
term “Employee” shall include an individual receiving differential wage payments (within the meaning of Code Section 414(u)(12)(D)) from the Sponsor or an Affiliated Company.” 

 

	2.	 Effective January 1, 2007, Subsection 5.2(b) is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 



“(b)    Notwithstanding the above, a Participant shall become fully vested in
his or her ESOP Account (i) upon the occurrence of the death, Disability, or attainment of age 62 of such Participant while an Employee; (ii) upon the occurrence of a Change in Control pursuant to Section 10.4(b); or
(iii) if, on or after January 1, 2007, the Participant dies while performing “qualified military service,” as defined in Code Section 414(u)(5).” 

 

	3.	 Effective January 1, 2010, Subsection 11.5(b) is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 



“(b)    Compensation shall include (i) any elective deferral as defined in
Code Section 402(g)(3); (ii) any amount which is contributed or deferred by the Company at the election of the Employee that is excludable from an Employee’s gross income under Code Sections 125 or 457; (iii) for Plan Years
beginning on or after January 1, 1998, any elective amount that is excludable from an Employee’s gross income under Code Section 132(f)(4); and (iv) effective January 1, 2009, differential wage payments within the meaning of
Code Section 414(u)(12)(D).” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Allergan, Inc. hereby executes this Second
Amendment to the Allergan, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Restated 2008) on this 11th day of November, 2010. 
  

			
	By:	 	/s/ Scott D. Sherman
		 	 Scott D. Sherman

Executive Vice President, Human Resources
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Stergiou, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 28]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J., at suppression hearing; James Leff, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered December 2, 1996, convicting defendant of reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and statements was properly denied. Since the police did not enter defendant’s apartment until after he threw a lit flare at an officer and set his apartment on fire, a point at which police and fire personnel were obviously duty-bound to enter, there is no basis for suppression of any of the fruits of the entry. The record fails to support defendant’s argument that his incendiary conduct was “provoked” by allegedly unlawful prior police intrusions *(see, People v Townes,*41 NY2d 97). In any event, the police preparations for making an emergency entry, which included removing the peephole from defendant’s door and breaking and opening windows, were independently justified, under the emergency doctrine, by the totality of the information available to the police at the time *(People v Mitchell,*39 NY2d 173, *cert denied*426 US 953; *Matter of Pablo C.,*220 AD2d 235; *People v Scala,*159 AD2d 259, *lv denied*76 NY2d 742; *see also, Monday v Oullette,*118 F3d 1099, 1102). A psychiatrist informed the police that he had learned from defendant’s mother that her son intended to kill himself and had four bottles of gasoline in his apartment. The psychiatrist showed the police his credentials and accompanied them to defendant’s apartment, where the police smelled gasoline and observed that defendant had barricaded himself inside and was making bizarre statements.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury properly *388concluded that defendant’s conduct constituted reckless endangerment in the first degree (see, Penal Law § 120.25; *People v*Narimanbekov, 258 AD2d 417).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Williams, J. P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-27-2000
<CASH>                                         361,539
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,431,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,908,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,871,708
<PP&E>                                       2,125,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,026,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,361,571
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           883
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,026,553
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,789,050
<CGS>                                       18,023,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,777,958<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,093,912)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,767,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (311,605)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,455,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (352,919)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                200,460
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (920,923)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
<FN>
<F1>SG&A
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         146,657
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  182,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (12,965)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      12,139,015
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,056,785)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,944,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          339,069
<BONDS>                                      7,620,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,985,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,944,711
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,522,807
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,126,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             664,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (281,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (281,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (281,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.43)
        

</TABLE>
exv10w28






Exhibit 10.28




Compensation Arrangements for

Certain Named Executive Officers



Set forth below is a summary of the compensation arrangements of the incumbent executive
officers to be named in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
other than Mr. Jon P. Vrabely, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, who is covered
by a written employment agreement filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”).



Each of the executive officers named below is an employee at will whose compensation and employment
status may be changed at any time in the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.




     Base Salaries. In September 2009, the Company instituted a temporary 10% reduction in the
base salaries of certain employees, including each of the executive officers. The temporary
reductions were made to mitigate the impact of seasonal decreases in construction activity, which
generally adversely affect the Company’s first and fourth quarters. The temporary reductions
remained in effect at February 15, 2010.



     As of February 15, 2010, the unreduced base salary for each of the incumbent executive
officers, other than Mr. Vrabely, and the base salary for each such officer after giving effect to
the temporary salary reduction described above are as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Base Salary	 	 
	Name and Principal Position	 	(unreduced)	 	(after 10% reduction)
	Philip W. Keipp —
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(1)
	 	$	250,000	 	 	$	225,000	 
	Gregory W. Gurley —
Vice President, Product Management and Marketing
	 	$	225,000	 	 	$	202,500	 
	Brian D. Robinson —
Vice President, Chief Information Officer
	 	$	199,500	 	 	$	179,500	 
	Richard A. Baltz —
Vice President, Internal Audit
	 	$	190,000	 	 	$	171,000	 





Base salaries are adjusted from time to time. Any such adjustments are approved by the Management
Organization and Compensation Committee.



Bonuses and Equity Awards. These executive officers are also eligible to participate in the
Company’s annual incentive compensation plans and equity incentive compensation plans, as provided
in the terms of such plans. Such plans, and any forms of awards thereunder providing for material
terms, are included as exhibits to the Form 10-K.