alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

PATRICIA ANTHONY; AND WILLIAM ANTHONY, Appellants, vs. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Respondent. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed on April 14, 2022, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same date, this court issued a notice directing appellants to pay the filing fee within 14 days and cautioned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this appeal. In response, appellants filed a notice informing this court that it was not their intent to file the appeal at this time. The notice is construed as a motion to voluntarily withdraw this appeal. The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN \.. BY:

cc: Hon. Barry L. Breslow, District Judge Patricia Anthony William Anthony Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Washoe District Court Clerk No. 84557 

# FILED APR 2 0 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OFAUPREME COURT BT. S • \

if DEPUTY CI.0

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (0) 1947 agfPx. A9-1? t
Deangelo WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105965

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: August 14, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., and Mary K. Hoff, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Deangelo Wilson appeals from the "Memorandum Decision and Judgment" denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the *557reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ideal Accents, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ideal Accents, Inc., and will be retained by Ideal Accents, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/S/ Karim Suleman__________________

Karim Suleman, Chief Executive Officer,

President, Director and Chief Financial

Officer



Date:  November 15, 2005
#### Edwin R. Knotts *v.*Board of Education, *etc., of Bridgeport.*

(No. 7465)

Submitted November 1, 1932.

Decided November 15, 1932.

*W. Bruce Talbott,*for relator.

*A. M. Ccmlrall*and *Kendall H. Keeney,*for respondent.

Hatcher, President :

The petitioner, a teacher of manual training, seeks a mandamus to compel the defendant board of education to complete an alleged contract of employment with him to teach school.

The records of the board relating to this matter contain the following minutes: At a meeting of the members on March 19, 1932, “Motion made and carried that the following teachers for the high school be employed; * * E. R. Knotts * * *. Motion made and carried that no teacher be offered a contract until proper certificate be filed with the secretary.” At a meeting on April 13th, “Motion made and carried that the employment of any teacher be deferred until a later date. ’ ’ And at a meeting on June 18th, 1' * * * Motion made and carried that our manual training department be discontinued for the present. * * * Motion made and carried that since the manual training department was being discontinued, that a manual training teacher would not be needed. ’ ’

The petitioner was notified by.letter of the secretary, written June, 18th of the action taken by the board on that day. *57Petitioner says lie disregarded the notification because of a verbal representation that he would be employed, made to him by the president of defendant about the last of May (1932). The petitioner had not procured his certificate from the department of education on June 18th, though he did receive it later '(about September 1st). He reported to the principal of the high school for duty each day of the opening week in September, but was assigned to no work. On September 10th he presented the board with a standard form of teacher’s contract, signed by himself, which was returned to him by defendant, unsigned.

Code 1931, 18-7-1, provides that a school teacher shall be appointed (a) on or before the first Monday in July in each year if practicable, and (b) the, appointment shall be in writing according to the form of contract to be furnished by the state superintendent of schools. The appointment is not complete until the last act required of the board is performed, to-wit, its execution in writing of the formal contract. See *Taylor*v. *Board of Education,*111 W. Va. 52, 160 S. E. 299, and authorities there cited. Petitioner’s appointment was never legally completed. It is unfortunate that he relied on his conversation with the president of defendant, as that conversation is not binding on defendant. *Pa. L. R. Co.*v. Board, 20 W. Va. 360; *Honaker*v. *Board,*42 W. Va. 170, 24 S. E. 544. Even his selection on March 19th was dependent on the filing of his certificate with the secretary. Before he took steps to secure the certificate, to-wit, on June 18th, the board withdrew his tentative selection and so notified him. Therefore, he presents no legal right in support of his demand, much less the requisite clear legal right of an executed contract by the board.

The writ is refused.

*Writ refiosed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5187 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5187

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize additional 
 appropriations for the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts 
                          for fiscal year 2007.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN F. KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS.

    (a) Maintenance, Repair, and Security.--Section 13(a) of the John 
F. Kennedy Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76r(a)) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``, 2006, and 2007.'' and 
    inserting ``and 2006; and''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(3) $19,100,000 for fiscal year 2007.''.
    (b) Capital Projects.--Section 13(b) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 76r(b)) 
is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``, 2006, and 2007.'' and 
    inserting ``and 2006; and''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(3) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2007.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
ex10-2.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2







GEORGETOWN SAVINGS BANK


INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


2011 GOALS










Organizational Level:  Executive








	
Employee:

	
Joseph W. Kennedy

	
Incentive Target:

	
11% ($14,080)


	
Title:

	
Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer

	
Current Salary:

	
$128,000

















The dollar figures presented in this example are estimates.  Incentive payments will be based on the employee’s base compensation, which includes actual straight-time pay (excludes overtime and prior year’s Incentive Compensation Plan payments), jury duty, holiday, vacation, personal and sick pay for the 2011 calendar year.


 


 



















Minimum Thresholds




In order to receive payment for achievement of the goals listed below, the following thresholds must be met:



	
  

	
1.

	
CAMELS ratings must remain at one of the two highest ratings at all times during the Plan Year.  This will be measured by the OTS.








	
  

	
2.

	
Asset Quality must remain at a level of “Satisfactory” or better at all times during the Plan Year.  This will be measured by both internal audit results and OTS rating.












Tier 1:  Bank-wide Performance







GOAL: #1: Profitability – Achieve ROA







 Annual Payout Percentage: 50% = $7,040








	
 


Goals

	
 


Payout


	
95% of budget

	
$2,347


	
At budget

	
$4,693


	
106% of budget

	
$7,040


	
Stretch Goal

	  
	
Every .05% over 106% of budget

	
$2,347






















Tier 2:  Team Performance







 


GOAL #2: Profitability – Achieve Net Interest Margin Percentage







Annual Payout Percentage: 25% = $3,520








	
 


Goals

	
 


Payout


	
98% of budget

	
$1,173


	
At budget

	
$2,347


	
102% of budget

	
$3,520


	
Stretch Goal

	  
	
Every .09% over 102% of budget

	
$1,173

















 


 




  





  











  








 







GOAL #3: Profitability – Achieve Non-Interest Expense Level







Annual Payout Percentage: 25% = $3,520








	
 


Goals

	
 


Payout


	
2% above budget

	
$1,173


	
At budget

	
$2,347


	
2% below budget

	
$3,520


	
Stretch Goal

	  
	
Every $144,628 under 2% below budget

	
$1,173


















Tier 3:  Individual Performance










Goals:   None









Minimum Level of Expectations


To be eligible for this Incentive Compensation Plan the employee must meet the following:



	
  

	
·

	
Performing at a satisfactory level or above,








	
  

	
·

	
Not on written warning, and








	
  

	
·

	
Actively employed at the time of the incentive payment.












Clawback Provision


The Bank shall have the right to recoup or “clawback” awards paid under this Plan if the Compensation Committee concludes that such awards were based on information that was later found to be materially incorrect, including awards that were determined, in whole or part, on financial statement information that is subsequently restated.
Exhibit 99.2

            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of Minden Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                   /s/ A. David Evans
                                   _________________________________
                                   Name: A. David Evans
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 13, 2002
| 1. | The      amount of the Loan: RMB Sixty million (RMB  60,000,000.00); |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      term of the loan agreement: From July 1, 2010 to December 31,      2010; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | The      type of the Loan: short-term loan; |
|----|---------------------------------------------|

| 4. | The      interest rate is the same as benchmark interest rate of the people's bank      of china in July 1 (5.31%APR); |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | The      Lender approves that the Borrower can pay off the loan before December 31,      2010 without any default interest. The Borrower only needs to pay the      interest during the period of July 1, 2010 to the day paying off the      load. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| The      Lender:                            | The      Borrower:                |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Tianjin      Tianshi Biological Engineering | Tianjin      Tiens Life Resources |
| Co.,      Ltd.                              | Co.,      Ltd.                    |

| By      /s/ Jinyuan Li           | By      /s/ Baolan Li            |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                             |                             |
| Title:      Legal Representative | Title:      Legal Representative |
| Aug      24, 2010                | Aug      24, 2010                |

----
CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS
  At March 31,2009£(in millions)Borrowings and IndebtednessShort-term borrowings
    
    
    9,624Short-term derivative financial instruments *
    
    
    37Total short-term borrowings
    
    
    9,661Long-term borrowings
    
    
    31,749Long-term derivative financial instruments *
    
    
    398Total long-term borrowings
    
    
    32,147Total borrowings and indebtedness
    
    
    41,808Share CapitalCalled up share capital (57,806,283,716 ordinary shares allotted, issued and fully paid)
    
    
    4,153Share premium account
    
    
    43,008Own shares held (5,322,411,101 shares)
    
    
    (8,036
    )Additional paid-in capital
    
    
    100,239Capital redemption reserve
    
    
    10,101Accumulated other recognized income and expense
    
    
    20,517Retained losses
    
    
    (83,820
    )Total equity and shareholders funds
    
    
    86,162Total Capitalization and Indebtedness
    
    
    127,970
 
 *
    
    Certain mark to market adjustments on financing instruments are included within derivative financial
instruments, a component of trade and other payables(1)
    
    At March 31, 2009, all borrowings and indebtedness are unsecured, except for indebtedness in
respect of Vodafone Essar of INR130 billion and Vodafone Holdings SA Pty Limited of ZAR6.1
billion.(2)
    
    At March 31, 2009, the Group had contingent indebtedness relating to outstanding guarantees,
performance bonds and other contingent indebtedness items totaling £663 million.(3)
    
    At March 31, 2009, the Group had cash and cash equivalents of £4,878 million and trade and
other receivables which comprise certain mark to market adjustments on financing instruments
of £2,707 million, giving total net borrowings and indebtedness of £34,223 million.(4)
    
    The Groups outstanding US and euro commercial paper, reported within short term borrowings
in the above table, increased by US$401 million, 1,437 million, JPY5,188 million and CHF20
million and decreased by £111 million between March 31, 2009 and May 26, 2009.(5)
    
    Other than the changes mentioned in the above footnotes and changes due to movements in
foreign exchange rates, there has been no material change in the capitalization and
indebtedness of the Group since March 31, 2009. S-1
In the MATTER OF: L.B., C.B.

No. COA18-815

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 4, 2019

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50359 Summary Calendar

GILBERT RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-598

- - - - - - - - - - December 23, 1997 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gilbert Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of his application for supplemental security income. He argues that substantial evidence did not exist to support the finding that he was not disabled. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by theNo. -2- district court. See Rodriguez v. Chater , No. A-95-CA-598 JN (W.D. Tex. April 28, 1997).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro
Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

November 14, 2007

---
Ledale NATHAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 104749

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: June 19, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 24, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: William J. Swift, Woodrail Centre, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.

For Respondent: JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Evan Buchheim, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

*100Ledale Nathan ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of 26 counts.1 Movant's motion for post-conviction relief challenges the conviction of two counts of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050 (RSMo. 2000);2 three counts of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020; four counts of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110; and ten counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.014. Movant was effectively sentenced to five life sentences and five 15-year sentences on the nonhomicide convictions challenged in his motion for post-conviction relief. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed his convictions and sentences in *State v. Nathan*, 522 S.W.3d 881 (Mo. banc 2017).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

Movant was convicted of one count of second-degree murder, two counts of first-degree assault, four counts of first-degree robbery, one count of first-degree burglary, five counts of kidnapping, and 13 counts of armed criminal action.

2

All subsequent citations are to RSMo. 2000, as updated by the 2012 Cumulative Supplement, unless otherwise noted.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                   ------------------------------------------


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Betsy Henley-Cohn and John
S. Tomac, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively,
of BIW Limited (the "issuer"), do each hereby certify that the report on Form
10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.




/s/ Betsy Henley-Cohn
------------------------------
Betsy Henley-Cohn
Chairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
BIW Limited

August 14, 2006





/s/ John S. Tomac
------------------------------
John S. Tomac
President and Treasurer
(chief financial officer)
BIW Limited

August 14, 2006