alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 18 AND 19 OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      681
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,213)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,065
<PP&E>                                           2,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,877)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,755
<SALES>                                         12,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,660
<CGS>                                           12,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,818
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,707)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,931)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)


</TABLE>
#### W. S. COX et al. v. T. S. TYSON.

*(Filed 7*March, 1928.)

Appeal by defendant from *Grady, J.,*at January Term, 1928, of Pitt.

Affirmed.

*F. C. Warding for plaintiff.*

*S. 0. Worthington for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

John Carroll died leaving a will, one item of which is as follows:

“Item 3. I give and bequeath to my grandson, *W.*S. Cox, all of that tract of land whereon I now live, to have and to hold unto him and his bodily heirs in fee simple forever, but if he dies without leaving living bodily heirs, then it is my desire that the above land be equally divided between my son *W.*F. Carroll, and my daughter Emily L. Oox.”

*On*22 December, 1922j *W.*F. Carroll, and all of the heirs *at*law of Emily Cox, deceased, to wit: Ernest Cox, David Oox, Joseph Roscoe Cox, Bessie Cox, and Leona Cox, conveyed to the plaintiff, *W.*E. Cox, all of their right, title and interest in the lands referred to in Item 3 of said will by deed recorded in Book Q, 14, at page 293, in the office of the register of deeds of Pitt County.

*853"W. S. Cox and wife thereafter executed a deed of trust on the devised land, under which it was sold and the defendant became the last and highest bidder. He declined to accept the trustee’s deed on the ground that the trustee cannot convey a title in fee.

It was adjudged that the trustee can convey a good and indefeasible title in fee simple. The defendant excepted and appealed.

In our opinion the judgment is free from error. It is accordingly

Affirmed.
BRUNSON v. NC INNOCENCE INQUIRY COMMISSION, et al.

41P19-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Jonathan E. Brunson, for Brunson, Jonathan E.

Barry H. Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission, et al.

*68The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of May 2019 by Plaintiff for Petition for Rehearing of Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                   ------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Betsy Henley-Cohn and John S.
Tomac, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, of
BIW Limited (the "issuer"), do each hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q
accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.




/s/ Betsy Henley-Cohn
---------------------
Betsy Henley-Cohn
Chairwoman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
BIW Limited

August 13, 2004





/s/ John S. Tomac
---------------------
John S. Tomac
President and Treasurer
(chief financial officer)
BIW Limited

August 13, 2004
<page>              EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2003 as filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results
     of operations of the Partnership.








By: /s/ Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name: 	 Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	 Chief Financial Officer

Date:	 March 30, 2004
Resolutions of the Board of Directors regarding Code Section 280G



 Exhibit 10.6 
 DEL MONTE FOODS COMPANY 
 ASSISTANT SECRETARY’S CERTIFICATE

 I, Maryann Bodayle, Assistant Secretary of Del Monte Foods Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certify that: 
 1. Attached as Exhibit A hereto is a true and correct copy of the resolutions duly adopted on November
24, 2010, at a meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors at which a quorum was present and acting throughout, and that such resolutions have not been amended, modified, rescinded or superseded and remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have caused this Assistant Secretary’s Certificate to be duly executed on this 28th day of February, 2011. 

 

	
	
	/s/ Maryann Bodayle
	Name:  Maryann Bodayle
	Title:  Assistant Secretary



EXHIBIT A 

Resolutions of the Board of Directors of Del Monte Foods Company Approved on November 24, 2010 

The following resolution was approved by the Board of Directors of Del Monte Foods Company (the “Company”) on November 24, 2010:

 WHEREAS, the Company maintains or is a party to certain plans, arrangements or agreements, pursuant to which the Company has obligations to
make payments to Company employees if such employees become subject to an excise tax imposed by Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) Section 4999 (the “Gross-Up Arrangements”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to clarify that the Gross-Up Arrangements shall apply to the full excise tax imposed by Code Section 4999 with respect
to all payments subject to such excise tax, whether in the form of equity, cash or otherwise, and to clarify the provisions of certain limitations on the Company’s obligations under the Gross-Up Arrangements. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Company hereby clarifies and approves any amendments to any Gross-Up Arrangements to the extent necessary to
clarify, that (1) the Gross- Up Arrangements shall apply to the full excise tax imposed by Code Section 4999 with respect to all “parachute payments” (as defined in Code Section 280G) (“Payments”) that become
subject to such excise tax for any reason, whether in the form of equity, cash or otherwise, and (2) to the extent that an existing Gross-Up Arrangement contains a provision limiting the gross-up payment in the event that an affected payment
does not equal or exceed 105% of the Capped Amount (or similar provision), then in the event the total amount of Payments does not equal or exceed 105% of the Capped Amount, no gross-up payment shall be made, and instead the total amount of Payments
shall be either (i) limited to the Capped Amount or (ii) provided in full, whichever of (i) or (ii) place the employee in the better after-tax position. The “Capped Amount” means three (3) times the employee’s
“base amount” (as defined in Code Section 280G), minus one dollar ($1).
ALASKA SEAFOOD C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2013

- 0652

DCN: 000 5 9 CBI

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

.
STATE v. Harvey Lee STEVENS, Jr.

291P19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 1, 2019

Christopher W. Brooks, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Blair E. Cody, III, Attorney at Law, Hickory, for Stevens, Harvey Lee (Jr.).

David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*908The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of August 2019 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of August 2019."
Third Amendment Directors' Savings Plan


 EXHIBIT 10.8.1 
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 SPECTRA ENERGY CORP 
 DIRECTORS’ SAVINGS PLAN 
 THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made this 8th day of December, 2009, by Spectra Energy Corp, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and amends the Spectra Energy Corp Directors’ Savings Plan originally adopted by the
Company and effective as of December 18, 2006 (the “Plan”), and as amended from time to time thereafter, in order to clarify the payment dates for installment payments. 
 The Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2010, unless otherwise provided herein, as follows: 
 1. A new Section 3.3 is added effective as of January 1, 2009, as follows: 
 3.3 An election to defer Compensation pursuant to Section 3.1 will remain in effect until revoked, except that no revocation will be
effective unless is it made prior to the beginning of the calendar year to which it relates. 
 2. Section 6.2(d) is
deleted in its entirety, and replaced with the following: 
  

	 	(d)	If a Participant is to be paid in either five or ten annual installments, the cash amount and number of whole shares of Company common stock to be included in a
particular annual installment will be determined by the Company utilizing the same valuation methodology provided in Section 6.2(c), applied as of the December 31 that immediately precedes the month of payment of that installment, and
divided by the installments then remaining to obtain the cash amount and the number of whole shares of Company common stock, including the cash amount for any fractional share, to be paid in the current installment. Notwithstanding the previous
sentence, the first annual installment payment will be determined using the same methodology, but applied as of the last day of the month that immediately precedes the payment of such first annual installment. An annual installment shall be paid as
promptly as administratively feasible after the cash amount and number of whole shares of Company common stock, including the cash amount for any fractional share, that are to be included in the installment have been determined, but payments must
commence not later than sixty (60) days after termination of service on the Board of Directors, as provided under Sections 4.3 and 5.2, and each successive installment payment shall be paid not later than sixty (60) days after each
December 31st following such termination of service. 

 As amended hereby, the Plan is hereby ratified
and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company
has adopted and executed this Third Amendment on this 8th
day of December, 2009, to be effective as of January 1, 2010. 
  

					
	SPECTRA ENERGY CORP
		
	By:	 	/s/     Dorothy M. Ables        
	Name:	 	Dorothy M. Ables
	Title:	 	Chief Administrative Officer
DRAFT

AGENDA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON A RULEMAKING TO CONSIDER

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS

FOR RESIDENTIAL FURNACES AND BOILERS

PLACE OF WORKSHOP: FORRESTAL BUILDING

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW

ROOM 1E-245

WASHINGTON, DC 20585

TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127

TELEFAX: 202-256-4617

DATE AND TIME: TUESDAY, JULY 17, 2001

9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.

PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP

The purpose of this public workshop is to hear the views of interested

persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider

updated energy efficiency standards for residential furnaces and boilers. The

Department will consider the views presented and comments submitted in

formulating its approach in the rulemaking.

1. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS

II. AGENDA REVIEW

III. RESIDENTIAL FURNACES AND BOILERS - TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

A. Introduction

B. Market and Technology Assessment

1. Overview

2. Product Classes

3. Baseline Residential Furnaces and Boilers

4. Screening Analysis

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 01B
C. Engineering Analysis

1. Overview

2. Retail Prices, Markups, and Installation Cost

3. Electricity Consumption

D. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

E. Consumer Sub-group Analysis

F. National Energy Saving and Net Present Value Analysis

G. Manufacturer Impact Analysis

H. Employment Impact Analysis

1. Utility Impact Analysis

J. Environmental Analysis

IV. ADJOURNMENT

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 01B
Thomas L. SHAFER and Caroline T. Shafer, Appellants, v. DIRECT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

WD 81469

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: October 2, 2018

Jeffery T. Adams, Clinton for appellant.

Michael E. McCausland, Kevin D. Looby, Kansas City for respondent.

Before Division Two: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam

Thomas and Caroline Shafer (collectively, "Appellants") appeal the circuit court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Direct General Insurance Company ("Direct") on claims involving a vehicle insurance policy. Appellants contend the court erred in granting summary judgment because the insurance policy contains an ambiguity that should be construed against Direct to provide coverage for their claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)
```

Exhibit 32.2
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Health Alternatives, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc D.
Roup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
          Company.

/s/ Marc D. Roup
Marc D. Roup
Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2003
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 49 (Monday, March 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the 
Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal

Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting 
on April 1, 2009, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Wednesday, April 1, 2009--1:30 p.m. until 5 p.m.
    The Subcommittee will discuss the Three Mile Island License Renewal 
Application and the associated Safety Evaluation Report (SER) with Open 
Items prepared by the staff. The Subcommittee will hear presentations 
by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, Exelon 
Generation Company, LLC, and other interested persons regarding this 
matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant 
issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as 
appropriate, for deliberation by the Full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Christopher Brown (telephone 301-415-7111) five days prior to the 
meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. 
Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the 
conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the 
Federal Register on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: March 10, 2009.
Cayetano Santos,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9-5622 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1




                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Weston Technologies Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Yin Sen Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

/s/ Yin Sen Wong
---------------------------------
Yin Sen Wong, Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 25, 2004
- 350 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports POPE v . DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Cite as 311 Neb. 350

Colt M. Pope, appellant, v. Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of Nebraska, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 15, 2022. No. S-21-206.

supplemental opinion Appeal from the District Court for Clay County: Stephen R. Illingworth , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. T. Charles James, of Langvardt, Valle & James, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant.Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Milissa JohnsonWiles for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy , Funke , Papik , and Freudenberg , JJ.
Per Curiam. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Colt M. Pope, concerning our opinion in Pope v. Department of Motor Vehicles , 310 Neb. 971, 969 N.W.2d 903 (2022). We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows: In the analysis section, under the subheading “OTHER ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR,” we modify the fourth para

graph to add as the final sentence the following: “We make Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/10/2022 08:06 AM CDT- 351 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports POPE v . DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Cite as 311 Neb. 350 no comment on any prohibitions or obligations under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-914(6) (Reissue 2014), as Pope has not assigned as error, nor has he argued he was prejudiced by, any purported violation of that statute.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.
exhibit10j.htm


    
      

      

    

    Exhibit
10(j)

    


    ANNEX
B

    


    Supplemental
Benefits

    


    1.          Pursuant
to Section 5.03 of the FPL Group, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(the “Plan”), which provides for the approval of this Supplement to the Plan,
additional pension credits shall be added to the Supplemental Pension Benefit
for certain Participants from time to time.  The amount and effective
date for the additional credits shall be shown on this Supplement to the
Plan.

    


    2.          Schedule
of Supplemental Benefits:

    


    
      	
              Participant

            	
              Amount/Description
      of Supplemental Pension Benefit

            	
              Effective
      Date

            
	
              Manoochehr
      K. Nazar

            	
              A
      $300,000 one-time credit to the participant’s Supplemental Pension
      Benefit

            	
              12/14/2007

            


    

    


    


    3.           This
Supplement shall be deemed incorporated by reference into the
Plan.  In the event of any discrepancy between this Supplement and the
provisions of the Plan, the provisions of this Supplement shall
govern.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00563

- CV

Laszlo Elias v. Teresa Espinosa

On Appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County , Texas Trial Cause No. 25,927

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

ap peal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , La s z lo Elias.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Novemb er 26, 2019
STATE of North Carolina v. Bryant Lamont BROWN

No. COA18-1044

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 7, 2019

AFFIRMED.