alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, as amended, (Pub. L. 110-343), the Boise and Payette National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public. 

# DATES:

Thursday, March 19, beginning at 10:30 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kimberly Brandel, Designated Federal Official, at (208) 347-0301 or e-mail                         *kbrandel@fs.fed.us.*

Dated: February 27, 2009. 

Suzanne C. Rainville, 

Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest.

 [FR Doc. E9-4765 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### In the Matter of Tiffany A. Susan A., Appellant; Society for Seamen’s Children et al., Respondents; Caroline L. et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

[723 NYS2d 859]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated January 11, 2000, as denied her cross motion to vacate the intervenor status granted to the former foster parents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find no basis to disturb the order insofar as appealed from.

The Family Court, Queens County, is directed to complete this proceeding forthwith. Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
STATE v. Jimmy Lee FARMER

8A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 20, 2019

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, Attorney at Law, for Farmer, Jimmy Lee.

Anna M. Szamosi, Assistant Attorney General, Derrick Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of May 2019 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of May 2019."

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 20th day of May 2019.
Exhibit 4.8
 To:
    
    THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC as AgentFrom:
    
    BANK OF CHINA LIMITED, LONDON BRANCH
  Vodafone Group Plc  4,000,000,000 Revolving Credit Agreement
dated 1 July 2010 (as amended from time to time) (the Credit Agreement)
      (a)
    
    have made our own independent investigation and assessment of the financial condition and
affairs of each Obligor and its related entities in connection with its participation in the
Credit Agreement and have not relied exclusively on any information provided to us by a
Finance Party in connection with any Finance Document; and(b)
    
    will continue to make our own independent appraisal of the creditworthiness of each Obligor
and its related entities while any amount is or may be outstanding under the Credit Agreement
or any Commitment is in force.
  Bank of China Limited, London Branch
1 Lothbury, London, EC2R 7DB
         1
# ~-- ~. 

### Response J):l\'C Loiterer

. '? """-J< 

# AI' Itohert Hackman Rcgiollal Airlinc Associ,llion i\ircraft Ownen &:. Pilots Associatioll ATA 

### Contacts. Withwhom outside the FAA hasthis ro sal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date N:ltionai Business ..\ircran Association Eli Cotli
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner
of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:   /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		May 15, 2008
Date:	   May 15, 2008



? 6 ?


? 6 ?

- 4 -
MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)





? 84 ?

- 37 -

- 85 -
AAM-12-349-E May 23, 2012

Exemption No. 10538 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0359

Mr. David MacDonald

President Flamingo Air

262 Wilmer Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45226

Dear Mr. MacDonald:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

On April 27, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Flamingo Air for an extension of Exemption No. 10048 from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption allowed Flamingo Air, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. That exemption, however, expired on April 30, 2012; therefore, we will treat your request as a new petition.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Flamingo Air.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that2

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Flamingo Air an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Flamingo Air, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the following

conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Flamingo Air are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Flamingo Air part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
Terrance L. JAMES v. STATE of North Carolina

No. 536P00-10

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2019

Terrance James, For James, Terrance L.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, For State of N. C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 8th of May 2019 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cleveland County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of May 2019 by Petitioner to Proceed Without Fees:

*694"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Ervin, J. recused
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5424 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5424

 To allow certain existing retirement plans maintained by churches to 
  continue to provide annuities directly to participants rather than 
                     through an insurance company.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2006

 Mr. Souder (for himself and Mr. Pitts) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow certain existing retirement plans maintained by churches to 
  continue to provide annuities directly to participants rather than 
                     through an insurance company.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANDFATHER RULE FOR CHURCH PLANS WHICH SELF-ANNUITIZE.

    (a) In General.--In the case of any plan year ending after April 
17, 2002, annuity payments provided with respect to any account 
maintained for a participant or beneficiary under a qualified church 
plan shall not fail to satisfy the requirements of section 401(a)(9) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 merely because the payments are not 
made under an annuity contract purchased from an insurance company if 
such payments would not fail such requirements if provided with respect 
to a retirement income account described in section 403(b)(9) of such 
Code.
    (b) Qualified Church Plan.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``qualified church plan'' means any money purchase pension plan 
described in section 401(a) of such Code which--
            (1) is a church plan (as defined in section 414(e) of such 
        Code) with respect to which the election provided by section 
        410(d) of such Code has not been made, and
            (2) was in existence on April 17, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
aaxi8kex103_372011.htm







 


EXHIBIT 10.3


 


 


RESIGNATION


 


 


To the Board of Directors of


Accelerated Acquisitions XI, Inc.,


a Delaware corporation


 


 


The undersigned, being an officer and director of the above-named corporation, does hereby resign from President, Secretary, Treasurer, and such resignation shall be effective immediately.


 


Said resignation is contingent and expressly conditioned upon (a) the sale of 22,350,000 shares of the Company’s common shares to Daniel Correa, PhD. and (b) the appointment of Daniel Correa, PhD. as a director and officer of the corporation.


 


Said resignation shall be effective on the date of the Closing of the transaction contemplated by the Subscription Agreements between the Company and Daniel Correa PhD.


 


Dated as of March 7, 2011


 




 



	 	/s/ Timothy Neher
	 	Timothy Neher
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Anuual Report of Historic Preservation Properties 1989 LP
("HPP'89") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         HPP'89.

/s/ Robert Gunn
-----------------
Robert Gunn
Asset Manager
(Performing similar functions of Financial Officer)

Date:  March 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Steven Dinetz, as Chief Executive Officer of NextMedia Operating, Inc.
(the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 13, 2004



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ STEVEN DINETZ                                   
|Steven Dinetz Chief Executive Officer of the
Company



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN
STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO NEXTMEDIA OPERATING, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY NEXTMEDIA OPERATING, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5539 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5539

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
      To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``North American Wetlands Conservation 
Reauthorization Act of 2006''.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
    Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ``fiscal year 2007'' and 
inserting ``each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q of East KansasAgri-Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, William R. Pracht, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ William R. Pracht                     |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | William R. Pracht                         |
|   | President and Principal Executive Officer |
|   | Dated: August 10, 2007               |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,541
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  850,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,171,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,202,636
<PP&E>                                       8,801,092
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,941,257)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,945,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,731,443
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,779,067
<OTHER-SE>                                     326,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,945,735
<SALES>                                      5,714,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,714,132
<CGS>                                        2,813,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,813,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,434,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             396,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*Phillips

(No. 6541)

Submitted April 15, 1930.

Decided April 22, 1930.

*Daugherty & Daugherty,*for plaintiff in error.

*Howard B. Lee,*Attorney General, and *W. Elliott Nejflen,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Litz, Judge:

The defendant, D. M. Phillips, was convicted in the common pleas court of Cabell county on a charge of aiding and abetting in the operation of a moonshine still. The evidence of four witnesses for the state, though substantially denied by the dé-*95fenclant as a witness in bis own bebalf, amply supports tbe finding of tbe jury.

Tbe defendant insists that tbe trial court erred in rejecting bis instruction No. 6 and in refusing to set aside tbe verdict and grant bim a new trial on tbe ground of after-discovered evidence. Tbe instruction in question, if granted, would bave told tbe jury that tbe mere transportation by tbe defendant of a moonshine still at tbe request of tbe operator thereof is not sufficient to convict bim of aiding and abetting in its operation. As tbe evidence for tbe state shows numerous other acts of tbe defendant tending to prove tbe charge, tbe instruction was, for that reason alone, properly rejected. *1 ‘*An instruction which singles out and gives undue prominence to certain facts in evidence to the exclusion of other facts equally important and as decisive of the issues involved, is improper.5 ’ *State*v. *Ison,*104 W. Va. 217, 139 S. E. 704.

The sole purpose of tbe alleged after-discovered evidence, set forth in affidavits filed by the defendant on his motion for a new trial, is to impeach certain state witnesses. “After-discovered evidence, offered simply to contradict or impeach a witness, will not warrant tbe granting of a new trial. *Wadkins*v. Digman, 82 W. Va. 623, 96 S. E. 1016; *State*v. *Stowers,*66 W. Va. 198, 66 S. E. 323; and *State*v. *Williams,*14 W. Va. 851.” *State*v. *Lemon,*84 W. Va. 25, 99 S. E. 263, 265.

Tbe judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
| EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|-------------------|

| Chief      Executive Officer Certification |
|--------------------------------------------|

| Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section    906 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|----------------------------------------|

| 1. | The      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and  |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.  |

|   Date:  March 10,      2008  |   /s/ Joseph D.      Reid                                                                    Joseph      D. ReidChief      Executive Officer |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|