alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GRANITE
BROADCASTING CORPORATION'S 1997 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,170,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,308,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,535,395
<PP&E>                                      36,004,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             633,614,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,734,678
<BONDS>                                    392,779,025
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      207,699,808
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        88,546
<OTHER-SE>                                (33,345,263)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              (33,256,717)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           153,511,540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              111,495,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,596,458
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          39,269,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,850,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,616,212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,466,839)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (5,569,119)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,035,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.57)
        

</TABLE>
#### Clarence L. Wright *v.*Board of Education of Huntington Independent District

(No. 7237)

Submitted April 26, 1932.

Decided May 3, 1932.

*George S. Wallace,*for plaintiff in error.

*George I. Neal*and *L. W. Blankenship,*for defendant in ' error.

Hatcher, President:

Plaintiff, C. L. Wright, was employed in 1929 as superintendent of schools for the independent district of Huntington by the defendant Board of Education (hereinafter called the Board) for a term of four years at an annual salary of $10,000.00, payable monthly. He served in this capacity until July 21, 1931, when his services were terminated in the manner shown by the following minutes of that date entered by the Board: * * the Board proposed to Mr. Wright they desired that he resign and surrender his contract. Whereupon, Mr. Wright offered to resign and surrender his contract as Superintendent upon the delivery of the Board issuing and delivering to him at once a voucher for the sum of $5,000.00; and upon motion duly made and seconded the proposition of Mr. Wright was accepted and the Secretary was directed to forthwith issue and deliver to Mr. Wright a voucher for $5,000.00 upon the delivering by *241Mr. Wright his written resignation and surrender of his contract.”

The plaintiff had been paid his salary up to July 1, 1931, and he was paid the $5,000.00 above referred to, on July 21st. He seeks in this action to recover for his services as school superintendent from July 1st to July 21st (both days inclusive), on the theory that the $5,000.00 was not meant to include his salary between those dates. From an adverse verdict and judgment in the circuit court, he secured a writ of error.

He complains of the admission of oral testimony relating to what occurred before, at, and after the Board meeting of July 21st, and contends that his case must be determined by what the above minutes show. The.claim he now advances is made under his contract of 1929 with the Board. In order to maintain the claim he must rely on that contract. But he can no longer rely on it, as the minutes show that he surrendered it fully and unconditionally to the Board on July 21, 1931. Its complete surrender included every right he had under it. Therefore his present claim is a part of his surrender of July 21st, and he is not entitled to recover. Under this view the alleged errors are inconsequential.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141688 & (31) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141688 

 COA: 291075 

Wayne CC: 08-014249-FC 

EUGENE CLARK POSEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 8, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5434 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5434

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 40 South Walnut Street in Chillicothe, Ohio, as the ``Larry Cox Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2006

  Mr. Ney (for himself, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Hobson, Mr. 
 Strickland, Mrs. Schmidt, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Ryan of 
   Ohio, Mr. Gillmor, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Regula, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. 
  Turner, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Chabot, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, and Mr. Boehner) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 40 South Walnut Street in Chillicothe, Ohio, as the ``Larry Cox Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LARRY COX POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 40 South Walnut Street in Chillicothe, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Larry Cox Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Larry Cox 
Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Attachment G

Work Sheets used to Calculate EPA Labor Costs

This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket for EPA ICR #0276.15 available at 

www.regulations.gov, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0617.

NAICS: 999100

Federal Executive Branch

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate

1

= W $55.66 $36.11 $20.59

Benefits Percentage

2

Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.74 $16.05 $9.15

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B =

W(1+Lb)

$80.40 $52.16 $29.74

Overhead Percentage3Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $40.20 $26.08 $14.87

Fully Loaded Hourly

Rate

Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH

$120.60 $78.24 $44.61

1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm May 2012 data

NAICS 999100 - Federal Executive Branch

Standard Occupational Codes:

Management: 11-0000, Management Occupations

Technical: 19-0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

Clerical: 43-0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth 

Edition, EPA-452-02-001, January 2002, pg. 2-34. The loading for indirect costs is within the 

range of 20-70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4825

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH MCKENZIE WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (CR-02-125)

Submitted: April 12, 2004 Decided: August 5, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary L. Lumsden, Rhonda Lee Overstreet, LUMSDEN, OVERSTREET &

HANSEN, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United

States Attorney, Donald R. Wolthuis, Assistant United States

Attorney, Carrol M. Ching, Third Year Practice Law Student,

Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Joseph McKenzie Williams appeals his conviction and

sentence for possession of heroin with intent to distribute, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (2000). He contends that the district

court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because his

stop, arrest, and detention were not supported by probable cause.

We review a district court’s legal determinations de novo.

Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996); United

States v. Rusher, 966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir. 1992). When a

suppression motion has been denied, we review the evidence in the

light most favorable to the government. See United States v.

Seidman, 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1998). 

Williams argues that the informant used by the police was

not reliable and therefore did not provide probable cause. We hold

that the information provided by the informant contained

sufficient indicia of reliability because lying would have been

against his penal interests. See United States v. Miller, 925 F.2d

695, 699 (4th Cir. 1991). We have reviewed the record and conclude

that under the totality of the circumstances, sufficient probable

cause existed to support Williams’s stop, arrest, and detention.

See Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230-32 (1983); United

States v. Singh, ___ F.3d ___, ___, 2004 WL 691524, at *5 (4th Cir.

Apr. 2, 2004). 
- 3 -

Accordingly, we affirm Williams’s conviction and

sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EX-10.1







Exhibit 10.1



NOTE




	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	March 2, 2011
	Maker:

	 	Claimsnet.com, Inc.
	Payee:

	 	Thomas Michel
	Place for Payment:

	 	14860 Montfort Dr., Suite 250, Dallas, TX 75254
	Principal Amount:

	 	Fifteen Thousand U.S. dollars (USD$15,000.00)






Annual Interest Rate on Unpaid Principal from Date of Funding: One and three quarters percent
(1.75%)



Terms of Payment: Principal and interest shall be due and payable on demand, interest being
calculated on the unpaid principal balance to the date of each installment paid, and the payment
made credited first to the discharge of interest accrued and the balance to the reduction of the
principal. Accrued and unpaid interest shall be computed on the basis of the actual days elapsed
in a year consisting of 365 days on the principal.



Annual Interest Rate on Demanded, Unpaid Amounts: The highest rate allowed by law.



Security for Payment: None



Maker promises to pay to the order of Payee at the place for payment and according to the
terms of payment the principal amount plus interest at the rates stated above. All unpaid amounts
shall be due upon demand.



On default in the payment of this note or in the performance of any obligation in any
instrument securing or collateral to it, this note and all obligations in all instruments securing
or collateral to it shall become immediately due at the election of Payee. Maker and each surety,
endorser, and guarantor waive all demands for payment, presentations for payment, notices of
intention to accelerate maturity, notices of acceleration of maturity, protest, and notices of
protest.



If this note or any instrument securing or collateral to it is given to an attorney for
collection or enforcement, or if suit is brought for collection or enforcement, or if it is
collected or enforced through probate, bankruptcy, or other judicial proceeding, then Maker shall
pay Payee reasonable attorney’s fees in addition to other amounts due. Reasonable attorney’s fees
shall be 10.0% of all amounts due unless either party pleads otherwise.



Nothing in this note shall authorize the collection of interest in excess of the highest rate
allowed by law.



Maker reserves the right to prepay the outstanding principal balance of this Note, in whole or
in part, at any time and from time to time, without premium or penalty. Any such pre-payment shall
be made together with payment of interest accrued on the amount of principal being prepaid through
the date of such prepayment, and shall be applied to the installments of principal due hereunder in
the inverse order of maturity.



Each Maker is responsible for the entire amount of this note.



The terms Maker and Payee and other nouns and pronouns include the plural if more than one.



Maker shall not be deemed to be in default of this note unless and until Maker shall have been
given seven (7) days written notice and opportunity to cure such default, via certified mail return
receipt requested.



Claimsnet.com, Inc.



By:  /s/ Don Crosbie



Don Crosbie, CEO



MAKER
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60075 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:98-CR-52-2-B-B

-------------------- October 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mario Johnson argues that the district court clearly erred in holding him responsible for drugs seized from the residence of codefendant Archie Moore Williams because the court did not make a specific finding that Johnson and Williams were engaged in a jointly undertaken criminal activity. It is implicit from the record that the district court found that Johnson and Williams engaged in a jointly undertaken criminal activity. Because Johnson does not dispute that he sold cocaine base supplied byNo. 99-60075 -2- Williams from the porch of Williams’ house and that Williams directed prospective purchasers to Johnson, he has failed to establish that the district court’s determination is clearly

erroneous. United States v. Morrow , 177 F.3d 272, 302 (5th Cir. 1999); see U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3. AFFIRMED.
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



/s/ Anthony E. Applebaum

------------------------------------------

Anthony E. Applebaum

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



February 13, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.41.2

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Amendment amends the Employment Agreement dated effective April 1,
2001 (the "Employment Agreement") between BLACK WARRIOR WIRELINE CORP
("Employer") and DANNY RAY THORNTON ("Employee").

         Whereas, effective April 1, 2001, the Employer and Employee entered
into the Employment Agreement, providing for Employee's employment.

         Now therefore, to reflect the agreement between the parties, Employer
and Employee do hereby amend the Employment Agreement, as follows:

         In the event of a Change of Control, the Company shall pay to the
Employee the sum of one (1) times the total annual compensation as in effect
during the twelve (12) months preceding the Change of Control.

         Change of Control of the Company, which for purposes of this Agreement
shall mean any of the following: (i) any person or group of persons (within the
meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,) shall have acquired, after the
Closing Date, beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated
by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,) of 20% or more of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of
Company having the right to vote for the election of Directors of Company under
ordinary circumstances; (ii) more than 25% of the assets of the Company are sold
in a transaction or series of related transactions; (iii) the Company shall
merge with any other person or firm; (iv) during any period of twelve
consecutive calendar months, individuals who at the beginning of such period
constituted the Board of Directors of Company (together with any new directors
whose election by the Board of Directors of Company or whose nomination for
election by the Stockholders of Company was approved by a vote of at least
two-thirds of the Directors then still in office who either were Directors at
the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was
previously so approved cease) for any reason other than death or disability to
constitute a majority of the Directors then in office; or (v) St. James Capital
Corp. ceases to be the general partner, managing partner or otherwise ceases to
be in control of St. James Capital Partners, LP or SJMB, LP; (v) W. L. Jenkins
shall cease to be President, or CEO, or a Director, or an Employee of the
Company.


EMPLOYEE:                                   EMPLOYER:

                                            BLACK WARRIOR WIRELINE CORP

                                            BY
----------------------------                   ---------------------------------
DANNY RAY THORNTON                             ITS:  PRESIDENT
exv10w31wc






Exhibit 10.31(c)




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

TRANSITION AND SUCCESSION AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO TRANSITION AND SUCCESSION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of
this 15th day of October, 2009, by and between Mylan Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
(the “Company”), and Daniel C. Rizzo, Jr. (“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain Transition and Succession
Agreement, as amended to date (the “Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, as permitted by Section 13(a) of the Agreement, the Company and Executive desire to
amend the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth herein;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:



     1. The second to last sentence of Section 4(c) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety. For the avoidance of doubt, such sentence hereby deleted begins “Anything in this
Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding . . .”



     2. This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under and construed in accordance with the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.



     3. Except as expressly set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are
and shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered as of the
day and year first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MYLAN INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Joseph F. Haggerty
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Joseph F. Haggerty 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President and General Counsel 	 
	 
	 	EXECUTIVE

 	 
	 	/s/ Daniel C. Rizzo, Jr.
 	 
	 	Name: Daniel C. Rizzo, Jr.