alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ricky Lee SCOTT, Petitioner v. STATE of Arkansas, Respondent

No. CR-98-1167

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Opinion Delivered March 8, 2018

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Associate Justice *280Pursuant to the state Freedom of Information Act, petitioner Ricky Lee Scott brings this pro se motion seeking a copy at public expense of certain written material on file with this court. In 1998, a jury found Scott guilty of murder in the first degree and sentenced him to life imprisonment. We affirmed. *Scott v. State* , 337 Ark. 320, 989 S.W.2d 891 (1999). Following affirmance of the judgment, Scott filed in this court four petitions requesting that jurisdiction be reinvested in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the case. The petitions were denied.1 Scott now asks to be provided with a copy of the four coram nobis petitions that he filed without requiring him to remit the standard photocopying fee charged by our clerk's office. Scott appended an affidavit of indigency to his motion.

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), codified as Arkansas Code Annotated sections 25-19-101 to -111 (Supp. 2017), does not require a court to provide photocopies at public expense. Likewise, indigency alone does not entitle a petitioner to photocopies at public expense. *See**Geatches v. State* , 2016 Ark. 452, 505 S.W.3d 691.

To be entitled to copies at public expense, a petitioner must demonstrate a compelling need for the copies as documentary evidence to support an allegation contained in a timely petition for postconviction relief. *Moore v. State,*324 Ark. 453, 921 S.W.2d 606 (1996) (per curiam). Scott has cited no postconviction remedy available to him and has otherwise made no showing of compelling need. If there is indeed a remedy available, he has not demonstrated that there is any particular issue that he cannot adequately raise to the court without access to the material he seeks. Accordingly, Scott has failed to show that copies of the coram nobis petitions should be provided to him at no cost.

It should be noted that when material has been placed on file with either this court or the court of appeals, the material remains permanently on file with the clerk. Persons may review the material in the clerk's office and photocopy all or portions of it. An incarcerated person desiring a photocopy of material on file with the clerk may write this court, remit the photocopying fee, and request that the copy be mailed to the prison. *Id.* All persons must bear the cost of photocopying unless this court has granted a motion for a copy of the requested material at public expense.

Motion denied.

1

*See**Scott v. State* , 2010 Ark. 363, 2010 WL 3796227 (per curiam); *Scott v. State* , 2009 Ark. 437, 2009 WL 3047239 (per curiam); *Scott v. State* , CR-98-1167 (Ark. Dec. 4, 2008) (unpublished per curiam); *Scott v. State* , CR-98-1167 (Ark. Oct. 12, 2006) (unpublished per curiam).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5510 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5510

     To direct the Administrator of General Services to install a 
photovoltaic system for the headquarters building of the Department of 
                                Energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the Administrator of General Services to install a 
photovoltaic system for the headquarters building of the Department of 
                                Energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INSTALLATION OF PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM AT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
              HEADQUARTERS BUILDING.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of General Services shall 
install a photovoltaic system, as set forth in the Sun Wall Design 
Project, for the headquarters building of the Department of Energy 
located at 1000 Independence Avenue, Southwest, Washington, D.C., 
commonly known as the Forrestal Building.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the General Services Administration to carry out this 
section $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2007. Such sums shall remain 
available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 05, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 05, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0209. IN THE INTEREST OF: A. E. W. A CHILD (MOTHER).

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

05116J
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
       Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of West Bancorporation, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. Stanberry,
Chief Executive Officer of West Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
conditions and results of operations of West Bancorporation, Inc.

August 5, 2004

/s/ Thomas E. Stanberry
-----------------------------------------------
Thomas E. Stanberry
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1202

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and

LIONEL MEADOWS; ALBERT L. MEADOWS; FURNEY MUNDINE, Plaintiffs,

versus
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; JOFFREE T. LEGGETT, Town Mayor; EDWARD EUBANKS; WILLARD O. LEWIS; CHARLES JONES, Councilman of the Town of Trenton, North Carolina; C. GLENN SPIVEY, Town Clerk; MC DAVID AND ASSOCIATES; RICHARD MOORE, Engineer for the Town ofTrenton, North Carolina; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, and its entities; BILL MEYERS, Director, North Carolina Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources; DEXTER MATTHEWS, Chief, Division of Solid Waste; J. BOBBY BLOWE, Chief, Construction Grants; JAMES C.KEARNEY, Director, Rural Economic and Community Development; JOHN H. HANKINSON, JR., Director, United States Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region IV; MARIO MACHADO, Chief, Construction Grants, their successors and agents; EDWIN W. CAUSEY, as Rural Development Manager; WILLARD R. DEAN, as Director of Business and Utilities Division; JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States; JANICE M. COLE, Defendants - Appellees.2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-6-H-2-4) Submitted: May 28, 1999 Decided: June 18, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Christopher Henderson, Trenton, North Carolina; Daniel Calvin Oakley, Assistant Attorney General, Michael F. Easley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, Anne Margaret Hayes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM:Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order dismissing the federal and state Defendants, denying the local government Defendants’ motion to dismiss some claims, and dismissingthe remaining claims. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We grant the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Roman GregorigRoman GregorigVice President and Principal Financial Officer E-3
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeff Kinsella, Chief Financial Officer of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2006

 

/s/ Jeff Kinsella                                                

Jeff Kinsella

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,606,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,410<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,845,654<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,845,654<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,559,110<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,016,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                543,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            543,088
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   543,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $32,410.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $206,564.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $239,703, accrued
management fees of $27,114 and accrued incentive fee of $3,871.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $2,694,659,
net change in unrealized of $(1,542,785), and interest income of
$407,236.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### *S. v. Hardison.*

Appeal by defendant from *Williams, J.,*April Term, 1949, of Obaven. Affirmed without written opinion 11 October, 1949.
**EXHIBIT 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Monarch CommunityBancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period andresults of operations of the Company for such period.        Date: August 12, 2004 By:  /s/ John R. Schroll       John R. SchrollPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)           Date: August 12, 2004 And:  /s/ William C. Kurtz       William C. KurtzSenior Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
Elaine DEROUIN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DISCOVER BANK, Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 105664

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: December 12, 2017 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 30, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 3, 2018

Nicholas G. Higgins, Eureka, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Christopher M. Hohn, Matthew D. Guletz, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

*58Elaine DeRouin (DeRouin) appeals from the trial court's judgment granting Discover Bank's (Discover) Motion to Dismiss Count II of DeRouin's Amended Petition asserting a claim pursuant to the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, Sections 407.010 to 407.130. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in granting Discover's motion and dismissing Count II of DeRouin's Amended Petition. *Fenlon v. Union Elec. Co.*, 266 S.W.3d 852, 854 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm1 the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

DeRouin's Motion for Attorney's Fees on Appeal is denied.
#### LINDSEY-ROBINSON & CO., INC., v. J. H. JONES, Individually and Trading as J. H. JONES HATCHERY.

(Filed 21 September, 1949.)

DEFENDANT’S appeal from *Burgwyn, Special Judge,*May Term, 1949, Pasquotane: Superior Court.

*John H. Hall and McMullan ,& Aydlett for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Harry B. Brown for defendant, appellant.*

PeR Ctteiam.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment by default final against the defendant Jones for goods sold and delivered to him. The defendant moves to set aside the judgment as irregular and voidable because rendered on open account without allegation of express contract.

The judgment was rendered May 10, 1948. The motion to set aside was not made until March 18, 1949.

Meantime, in a partition proceeding entitled Mildred Hooker *v.*J. H. Jones, $998.50 had been paid into court as Jones’ part of the proceeds of the sale of lands. The fund was attached for enforcement of a judgment obtained in a case entitled H. D. Scott & Co. *v.*Jones. Lindsey-Robinson & Co., Inc., intervened, claiming priority of lien under their judgment. In the ensuing litigation the defendant was an active party. The controversy reached the Supreme Court on appeals; and the ease is reported *ante,*74, q. v. H. D. Scott & Co. failed for want of service of summons to support the judgment and attachment levied thereunder, and the Lindsey-Robinson & Co. lien was sustained. *Mr. Justice Devin,*writing the opinion of the Court, said *re*this judgment:

> “While the judgment of the Lindsey-Robinson Co. seems to have been rendered by default final upon a complaint for goods sold and delivered (G.S. 1-211, G.S. 1-212), the judgment was not void, and there was no effort at the time of the hearing to attack it as irregular. Hence, the ruling of the judge below must be upheld. *Supply Co. v. Plumbing Co.,*195 N.C. 629, 143 S.E. 248; *Jeffries v. Aaron,*120 N.C. 167, 26 S.E. 696.”

Judge Burgwyn heard the matter May 9, 1949, and, reviewing the records and pertinent facts, denied the motion, and movant appealed.

We find in the record nothing to justify interference with the result.

The judment is

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Allen Washington, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 846]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), rendered November 19, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of four counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to four terms of 10 years and two terms of 5 years, all to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

*269The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.