alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jacinta Sit, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. on the Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oxford Technologies, Inc.







|                         |  |     |  |                                                              
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |     |  |                                                              
|Date:  November 25, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/Jacinta Sit                                               
|                         |  |     |  | Jacinta Sit, President                                       
|                         |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5510]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Friday, March 20, 2009, 9:30 a.m.
    U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, 
Washington, DC 20425.

Briefing Agenda

    Topic: An Examination of Civil Rights Issues with Respect to the 
Mortgage Crisis.

I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman
II. Speakers' Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn Briefing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public 
Affairs Unit (202) 376-8582. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: March 10, 2009.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-5510 Filed 3-10-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greystone Digital Technology,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jon M. Reynolds, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (SS)
1350, as adopted pursuant to (SS) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

/s/ Jon M. Reynolds
-------------------
Jon M. Reynolds
Director

August 5, 2002
STATE of North Carolina v. Owen P. WILLIAMS

No. 414P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Jeffrey William Gillette, Attorney at Law, for Williams, Owen P.

Melissa H. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of November 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
No. 09-8473.

#### Michael Shavers, Petitioner v. David Bergh, Warden, et al.

559 U.S. 1010, 130 S. Ct. 1887,

176 L. Ed. 2d 371,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 2644.

March 22, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.1350)

 

Theundersigned executive officer of Minden Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   | /s/ Becky T.  Harrell |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:                 | Becky T.  Harrell |
|   | Title:                | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

Date: May 14, 2003

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act has beenprovided to Minden Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Minden Bancorp, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.21


 


Director
Compensation Summary


 


Each director of Plains All American GP LLC who is not an
employee of Plains All American GP LLC is reimbursed for any travel,
lodging and other out-of-pocket expenses related to meeting attendance or
otherwise related to service on the board (including, without limitation,
reimbursement for continuing education expenses). Each non-employee director is
currently paid an annual retainer fee of $45,000. Mr. Armstrong is
otherwise compensated for his services as an employee and therefore receives no
separate compensation for his services as a director. In addition to the annual
retainer, each committee chairman (other than the chairman of the audit
committee) receives $2,000 annually. The chairman of the audit committee
receives $30,000 annually, and the other members of the audit committee receive
$15,000 annually, in each case, in addition to the annual retainer.


 


Our non-employee directors receive LTIP awards or cash equivalent
awards as part of their compensation. The LTIP awards vest annually in 25%
increments over a four-year period and have an automatic re-grant feature such
that as they vest, an equivalent amount is granted. The three non-employee
directors who serve on the audit committee each have outstanding a grant of
10,000 units (vesting 2,500 units per year). 
Upon vesting of the director LTIPs (other than the incremental audit
committee awards), a cash payment is made to Vulcan Capital as directed by the
Vulcan designee and to an affiliate of EnCap as directed by Mr. Petersen.
Such cash payment is based on the unit value of Mr. Sinnott’s award on the
previous year’s vesting date.


 


All LTIP awards held by a director vest in full upon the next following
vesting date after the death or disability (as determined in good faith by the
board) of the director. For audit committee grants, the awards also vest in
full if such director (i) retires (no longer with full-time employment and
no longer serving as an officer or director of any public company) or (ii) is
removed from the board of directors or is not reelected to the board of
directors, unless such removal or failure to reelect is for “good cause,” as
defined in the letter granting the units.
EXHIBIT 32.2*

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of California Coastal Communities, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandra G. Sciutto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



|Dated: March 9, 2004 |  | /s/SANDRA G. SCIUTTOSandra G. Sciutto Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---

---

QuickLinks
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5409 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to require that the Commissioner 

of Social Security notify individuals of improper use of their social 

security account numbers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2006 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to require 

that the Commissioner of Social Security notify individuals of improper use of their social security account 

numbers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Num5 ber Fraudulent Use Notification Act of 2006’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5409 IH

1 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS OF IMPROPER USE 

2 OF THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUM3 BERS. 

4 Section 205(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(I) In any case in which the Commissioner of Social 

8 Security determines that— 

9 ‘‘(i) the social security account number in the 

10 wage records provided to the Social Security Admin11 istration by an employer with respect to any em12 ployee does not match relevant records otherwise 

13 maintained by the Social Security Administration, or 

14 ‘‘(ii) the social security account number issued 

15 to an individual has otherwise been used by any 

16 other person in a fraudulent or otherwise illegal 

17 manner, 

18 the Commissioner shall promptly provide the individual (if 

19 any) to whom such social security account number was 

20 issued with written notification of the Commissioner’s de21 termination.’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

          - [Docket ID: USAF-2009-0017] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Air Force, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice to delete a system of records. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Air Force proposes to delete a system of records to its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

This action will be effective on April 16, 2009 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Officer, Office of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer, SAF/XCISI, 1800 Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220, Washington, DC 20330-1800. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Kenneth Brodie at (703) 696-7557. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Air Force systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                 

The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete a system of records notice in its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report. 

Dated: March 11, 2009. 

Morgan E. Frazier, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## F036 AETC E 

### System Name:

Recruiting Activities Management Support System (RAMSS) (June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793). 

### Reason: 

The records collected for this system are now covered by F036 AETC X, College Scholarship Program (CSP) (August 22, 2008, 73 FR 49659). 

Accordingly, this Privacy Act System of Records Notice should be deleted.

[FR Doc. E9-5700 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5546 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5546

 To designate the Federal courthouse to be constructed in Greenville, 
South Carolina, as the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2006

    Mr. Inglis of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Barrett of South 
Carolina, Mr. Brown of South Carolina, Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Spratt, and Mr. 
  Wilson of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal courthouse to be constructed in Greenville, 
South Carolina, as the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARROLL A. CAMPBELL, JR. FEDERAL COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal courthouse to be constructed in 
Greenville, South Carolina, building number SC0017ZZ, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal courthouse 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. Federal Courthouse.
                                 <all>
```
Unassociated Document


    SECOND
AMENDMENT TO

    KAMAN
CORPORATION POST-2004

    SUPPLEMENTAL
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT PLAN

     

    This
Amendment made this ____ day of _____________, 2010 by Kaman Corporation
(“Kaman” or the “Company”) for the purpose of amending its Post-2004
Supplemental Employees’ Retirement Plan,

     

    WITNESSETH:

     

    WHEREAS,
by Written Plan Instrument dated February 20, 2007, Kaman established the Kaman
Corporation Post-2004 Supplemental Employees’ Retirement Plan (the “Plan”);
and

     

    WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section 9.1
thereof; and

     

    WHEREAS,
the Plan was previously amended by a First Amendment thereto; and

     

    WHEREAS,
the Board desires to amend the Plan in the particulars set forth
below;

     

    NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

     

    1. The
following paragraph (c) is added to Section 4.2:

     

    “(c) In
no event shall “W-2 Earnings” or “Average Final Salary” determined under Section
4.1(a)(ii) and this Section 4.2 include any such amounts which would otherwise
be included within such definitions for periods after December 31,
2010.  No additional amounts shall be taken into account in
determining “W-2 Earnings” or “Average Final Salary” after that
date.”

     

    2.
Section 4.3 is amended to read as follows:

     

    “4.3 Adjustment for
Participants Employed by a Participating Employer Other than the Company or for
Participants who Commence Employment with the Company on or after July 12,
2004.  In the case of a Participant who is employed by a
Participating Employer other the Company whether the commencement of such
employment occurs before, on, or after July 12, 2004, or in the case of a
Participant who commences employment with the Company on or after July 12, 2004,
the amount of annual benefit that would have accrued for such a Participant
under the Pension Plan shall be determined under Section 4.1(a) above as if the
Participant were directly employed by the Company and had commenced employment
with the Company before July 12, 2004.”

    


    3. Except
as hereinabove modified and amended, the Plan as amended shall remain in full
force and effect.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Kaman Corporation has caused this Second Amendment to be
executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer on the day and year first
above written.

     

    
      	
              ATTEST:

            	 
      	
              KAMAN
      CORPORATION

            
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                   
      

            	 
      	
              By:

            	
                        
      

            
	
              Candace
      A. Clark

            	 
      	 
      	
              William
      C. Denninger

            
	
              Senior
      Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

            	 
      	 
      	
              Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the Annual
report on form 10-K for the year ended  January 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000840319
<NAME>                        Aphton Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          Feb-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            Jan-31-2000
<CASH>                                   9,920
<SECURITIES>                             9,259
<RECEIVABLES>                            8,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        19,867
<PP&E>                                   1,024
<DEPRECIATION>                            (851)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          28,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    6,132
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                    16
<OTHER-SE>                              64,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            28,192
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,404
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        12,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (11,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           (11,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.76)


</TABLE>
#### Leon Greenberg, Appellant, v Dennis Walsh, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[718 NYS2d 847]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered June 15, 1999, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him upon his failure to appear at a compliance conference, upon condition that he pay plaintiff $300, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks to recover a legal fee against defendant-respondent, a *pro se*litigant, owed as a result of plaintiffs representation of the codefendant in other litigation between the two defendants. Plaintiff alleges that defendants collusively settled the other litigation in order to deprive him of his fee. This claim is at odds with the principle that a client may discharge an attorney at any time with or without cause *(see, Matter of Cohen v Grainger,*81 NY2d 655, 658), and is unsupported by any evidence that respondent threatened the codefendant or used other unlawful means to induce her termination of plaintiffs retainer *(compare, Lurie v New Amsterdam Cas. Co.,*270 NY 379). Indeed, all that appears is that defendants are husband and wife who have reconciled. Considering all the circumstances including the absence of prejudice *(see, Loomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp.,*54 NY2d 18, 23-24), and the strong policy preference for resolving cases on the merits, vacatur of the default was a proper exercise of discretion. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

REGINALD HARRIS

NO. 2021 KW 1411

FEBRUARY 14, 2022

In Re: Reginald Harris, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 02- 04- 0559. 

BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. A writ application arising in a criminal

proceeding is not the proper procedural vehicle to establish a

right to records under the Public Records Law, La. R. S. 44: 1, et

seq. A person who wants to examine public records must make the

request to the custodian of records. See La. R. S. 44: 31 & 

44: 32. If a request for public records is denied by the

custodian, before seeking relief from this court, the person

must first institute civil proceedings for a writ of mandamus at

the district court level. See La. R. S. 44: 35( A). Should the

person prevail, he should be prepared to pay the regular service

fees for copies of the documents. After the district court

rules in the civil proceeding, the person may seek an appeal of

the district court' s action, if he desires. See La. R. S. 

44: 35( 0). See also State ex rel. McKnight v. State, 98- 2258

La. App. 1st Cir. 12/ 03/ 98), 742 So. 2d 894, 895 ( per curiam). 

We further note the records of the East Baton Rouge Parish Clerk

of Court' s Office reflect that the district court acted on

relator' s request for public records on January 19, 2022. 

PMc

JEW

MRT

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

4

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT