Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 49 / Monday, March 16, 2009 / Notices 11085 

1See Memo from the Department entitled 

‘‘Request for Comments on Wheat Code 

Classifications,’’ dated January 9, 2009. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to make a 

preliminary determination within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order or finding for which 

a review is requested. Section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further states that 

if it is not practicable to complete the 

review within the time period specified, 

the administering authority may extend 

the 245-day period to issue its 

preliminary results by up to 120 days. 

We determine that completion of the 

preliminary results of this review within 

the 245-day period is not practicable 

because the Department requested 

additional information from all 

interested parties regarding wheat code 

classifications for model match.1 Wheat 

code classification is an integral part in 

making comparisons between home 

market and U.S. sales in the 

Department’s margin calculations in this 

proceeding. Given the complexity of 

this issue and in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2), we are extending the 

time period for issuing the preliminary 

results of review by 120 days. Therefore, 

the preliminary results are now due no 

later than July 31, 2009. The final 

results continue to be due 120 days after 

publication of the preliminary results. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to sections 751(a) and 777(i) of 

the Act. 

Dated: March 9, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–5668 Filed 3–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–888 

Floor–Standing, Metal–Top Ironing 

Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 9, 2008, the 

U.S. Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the 2006 2007 administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on floor–standing, metal–top ironing 

tables from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC). See Floor–Standing, 

Metal–Top Ironing Tables and Certain 

Parts Thereof From the eople’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 73 FR 52277 (September 9, 

2008) (AR3 Preliminary Results). This 

review covers two exporters. The period 

of review (POR) is August 1, 2006 

through July 31, 2007. We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have made 

changes in the margin calculations. 

Therefore, the Final Results differ from 

the Preliminary Results. The weighted 

average dumping margins are listed 

below in the section entitled ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 16, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

We published in the Federal Register 

the preliminary results of the second 

administrative review on September 9, 

2008. See AR3 Preliminary Results. 

Following the AR3 Preliminary 

Results, on October 8 and October 10, 

2008, the Department received 

respective case briefs from Since 

Hardware and from Home Products 

International (the Petitioner in this 

case). On October 14, and October 17, 

2008, respectively Petitioner and Since 

Hardware submitted rebuttal briefs. On 

January 5, 2009, the Department 

extended the time frame for publication 

of the final results of review by an 

additional 60 days. See Floor–Standing 

Metal–Top Ironing Tables and Certain 

Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limit for the Final Results of 

Administrative Review, 74 FR 267 

(January 5, 2009). 

Scope of the Order 

For purposes of the order, the product 

covered consists of floor–standing, 

metal–top ironing tables, assembled or 

unassembled, complete or incomplete, 

and certain parts thereof. The subject 

tables are designed and used principally 

for the hand ironing or pressing of 

garments or other articles of fabric. The 

subject tables have full–height leg 

assemblies that support the ironing 

surface at an appropriate (often 

adjustable) height above the floor. The 

subject tables are produced in a variety 

of leg finishes, such as painted, plated, 

or matte, and they are available with 

various features, including iron rests, 

linen racks, and others. The subject 

ironing tables may be sold with or 

without a pad and/or cover. All types 

and configurations of floor–standing, 

metal–top ironing tables are covered by 

this review. 

Furthermore, the order specifically 

covers imports of ironing tables, 

assembled or unassembled, complete or 

incomplete, and certain parts thereof. 

For purposes of the order, the term 

‘‘unassembled’’ ironing table means a 

product requiring the attachment of the 

leg assembly to the top or the 

attachment of an included feature such 

as an iron rest or linen rack. The term 

‘‘complete’’ ironing table means product 

sold as a ready–to-use ensemble 

consisting of the metal–top table and a 

pad and cover, with or without 

additional features, e.g., iron rest or 

linen rack. The term ‘‘incomplete’’ 

ironing table means product shipped or 

sold as a ‘‘bare board’’ i.e., a metal–top 

table only, without the pad and cover 

with or without additional features, e.g. 

iron rest or linen rack. The major parts 

or components of ironing tables that are 

intended to be covered by the order 

under the term ‘‘certain parts thereof’’ 

consist of the metal top component 

(with or without assembled supports 

and slides) and/or the leg components, 

whether or not attached together as a leg 

assembly. The order covers separately 

shipped metal top components and leg 

components, without regard to whether 

the respective quantities would yield an 

exact quantity of assembled ironing 

tables. 

Ironing tables without legs (such as 

models that mount on walls or over 

doors) are not floor–standing and are 

specifically excluded. Additionally, 

tabletop or countertop models with 

short legs that do not exceed 12 inches 

in length (and which may or may not 

collapse or retract) are specifically 

excluded. 

The subject ironing tables were 

previously classified under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) subheading 9403.20.0010. 

Effective July 1, 2003, the subject 

ironing tables are classified under new 

HTSUS subheading 9403.20.0011. The 

subject metal top and leg components 

are classified under HTSUS subheading 

11086 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 49 / Monday, March 16, 2009 / Notices 

9403.90.8040. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and for Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) purposes, the 

Department’s written description of the 

scope remains dispositive. 

Separate Rates 

Since Hardware and Forever Holdings 

requested a separate, company–specific 

antidumping duty rate. In the AR3 

Preliminary Results, we found that both 

Since Hardware and Forever Holdings 

had met the criteria for the application 

of a separate antidumping duty rate. See 

Preliminary Results, 72 FR at 52278. 

We have determined that because 

Since Hardware has provided inaccurate 

and unreliable data, it is no longer 

eligible for separate rate status, and thus 

is properly considered to be part of the 

PRC–wide entity. See Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at page 6. See 

also, Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 74 FR 883 

(January 9, 2009) (where the Department 

revoked a respondent’s separate rate 

status after the respondent refused to 

cooperate with the Department’s 

administrative review). We have not 

received any information since the 

Preliminary Results with respect to 

Forever Holdings that would warrant 

reconsideration of our separate–rates 

determination. Therefore, we have 

assigned an individual dumping margin 

to Forever Holdings for this review 

period. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs by 

the parties and to which we have 

responded are addressed in the 

Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, from John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations entitled ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results in the Administrative Review of 

Floor–Standing, Metal–Top Ironing 

Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from 

the People’s Republic of China’’, (March 

9, 2009) (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. A list of the 

issues raised, all of which are in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, is 

attached to this notice as Appendix I. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in the briefs and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum, which is on file in 

the Central Records Unit (CRU), room 

1117 of the Department of Commerce. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Web at 

http://trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Changes since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received from 

interested parties, we have based our 

analysis for the PRC–wide entity, which 

includes Since Hardware on AFA. See 

Comment 1 of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the discussion of the 

basis for, and the application of, AFA; 

see also Memorandum from Richard 

Weible, Director, Office 7 to John M. 

Andersen, Acting Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Since 

Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd’s. Claim 

Regarding Market Economy Purchases, 

and Use of Adverse Facts Available,’’ 

dated March 9, 2009 (AFA 

Memorandum). 

We have also used the financial 

statements of Infiniti Modules for the 

year ended March 31, 2007 to calculate 

factory overhead, SG&A expenses and 

profit in the final results calculations for 

Forever Holdings. See Comment 2 of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

antidumping duty margins exist in these 

final results: 

Exporter Margin (percent) 

PRC–wide Entity (which 

includes Since Hardware) ......................... 157.68 % 

Forever Holdings Limited ............................ 0.00% 

See AFA Memorandum for discussion 

of the basis for, and application of, AFA 

with respect to the PRC–wide entity, 

which includes Since Hardware. For 

details on the calculation of the 

antidumping duty weighted–average 

margin for Forever Holdings, see 

Memorandum to the File; from Michael 

J. Heaney, Senior International Trade 

Compliance Analyst; ‘‘Floor–Standing, 

Metal–Top Ironing Tables and Certain 

Parts Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Forever Holdings 

Limited (Forever Holdings) Analysis 

Memorandum for the Final Results,’’ 

dated March 9, 2009. The public 

versions of both memoranda are on file 

in the CRU. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) 

and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department 

will determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of review. For assessment 

purposes, where possible, we calculated 

importer–specific assessment rates for 

subject ironing tables from the PRC via 

ad valorem duty assessment rates based 

on the ratio of the total amount of the 

dumping margins calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of those same sales. We will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Since 

Hardware the cash deposit rate will be 

157.68 percent; (2) for Forever Holdings, 

the Department has calculated a zero 

percent margin for these final results, 

and therefore no cash deposit will be 

required for this company; (3) for 

previously–investigated or reviewed 

PRC and non–PRC exporters not listed 

above that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter–specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (4) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, including those 

companies for which this review has 

been rescinded, the cash deposit rate 

will be the PRC–wide rate of 157.68 

percent; and (5) for all non–PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporters that 

supplied that non–PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as the final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and in the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 49 / Monday, March 16, 2009 / Notices 11087 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction or conversion to 

judicial protective order of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This administrative review and this 

notice are published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: March 9, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

Issues in Decision Memorandum 

Comment 1: Since Hardware’s Claimed 

Purchases of Inputs from Market 

Economy Suppliers; Use of Adverse 

Facts Available 

Comment 2: Proper Financial 

Statements to Use in Calculating 

Respondents’ Financial Expenses 

[FR Doc. E9–5627 Filed 3–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–863 

Honey from the People’s Republic of 

China: Partial Rescission of the 

Seventh Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 16, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Bertrand or Blaine Wiltse, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3207 or (202) 482– 

6345, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 2, 2009, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) 

covering the period December 1, 2007, 

through November 30, 2008. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 74 FR 5821 (February 2, 2009). 

On February 23, 2009, the American 

Honey Producers Association and the 

Sioux Honey Association (collectively 

‘‘Petitioners’’) timely withdrew their 

request for an administrative review for 

the following 33 companies: Alfred L. 

Wolff (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Anhui Honghui 

Foodstuff (Group) Co., Ltd., Cheng Du 

Wai Yuan Bee Products Co., Ltd., 

Chengdu Stone Dynasty Art Stone, 

Eurasia Bee’s Products Co., Ltd., Fresh 

Honey Co., Ltd. (formerly Mgl. Yun 

Shen), Golden Tadco Int’l, Hangzhou 

Golden Harvest Health Industry Co., 

Ltd., Haoliluck Co., Ltd., Hubei Yusun 

Co., Ltd., Inner Mongolia Altin Bee– 

Keeping, Jiangsu Kanghong Natural 

Healthfoods Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Light 

Industry Products Imp & Exp (Group) 

Corp., Jilin Province Juhui Import, 

Maersk Logistics (China) Company Ltd., 

Nefelon Limited Company, Ningbo 

Shengye Electric Appliance, Ningbo 

Shunkang Health Food Co., Ltd., 

Qingdao Aolan Trade Co., Ltd., QHD 

Sanhai Honey Co., Ltd., Renaissance 

India Mannite, Shaanxi Youthsun Co. 

Ltd., Shanghai Bloom International 

Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai Foreign 

Trade Co., Ltd., Shanghai Hui Ai Mal 

Tose Co., Ltd., Shanghai Taiside 

Trading Co., Ltd., Sichuan–Dujiangyan 

Dubao Bee Industrial Co., Ltd., 

Silverstream International Co., Ltd., 

Tianjin Eulia Honey Co., Ltd., Wuhan 

Bee Healthy Co., Ltd., Wuhan Shino– 

Food Trade Co., Ltd., Wuhu Qinshi 

Tangye, and Xinjiang Jinhui Food Co., 

Ltd. Petitioners were the only party to 

request a review of the entries of subject 

merchandise exported by these 

companies. 

Partial Rescission 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if a party 

who requested the review withdraws 

the request within ninety days of the 

date of publication of notice of initiation 

of the requested review. Because 

Petitioners’ withdrawal of requests for 

review was timely and no other party 

requested a review of the 

aforementioned companies, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

we are rescinding this review with 

respect to the 33 aforementioned 

companies for which Petitioners 

withdrew their request for an 

administrative review. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For those 

companies for which this review has 

been rescinded and which have a 

separate rate from a prior segment of 

this proceeding, antidumping duties 

shall be assessed at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(2). The Department will 

issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice for the 

following companies: Anhui Honghui 

Foodstuff (Group) Co., Ltd., Jiangsu 

Kanghong Natural Healthfoods Co., Ltd., 

Shanghai Taiside Trading Co., Ltd., and 

Wuhan Bee Healthy Co., Ltd. 

The Department cannot order 

liquidation for companies which, 

although they are no longer under 

review as a separate entity, may still be 

under review as part of the PRC–wide 

entity. Therefore, the Department 

cannot, at this time, order liquidation of 

entries for the following companies: 

Alfred L. Wolff (Beijing) Co., Ltd., 

Cheng Du Wai Yuan Bee Products Co., 

Ltd., Chengdu Stone Dynasty Art Stone, 

Eurasia Bee’s Products Co., Ltd., Fresh 

Honey Co., Ltd. (formerly Mgl. Yun 

Shen), Golden Tadco Int’l, Hangzhou 

Golden Harvest Health Industry Co., 

Ltd., Haoliluck Co., Ltd., Hubei Yusun 

Co., Ltd., Inner Mongolia Altin Bee– 

Keeping, Jiangsu Light Industry 

Products Imp & Exp (Group) Corp., Jilin 

Province Juhui Import, Maersk Logistics 

(China) Company Ltd., Nefelon Limited 

Company, Ningbo Shengye Electric 

Appliance, Ningbo Shunkang Health 

Food Co., Ltd., Qingdao Aolan Trade 

Co., Ltd., QHD Sanhai Honey Co., Ltd., 

Renaissance India Mannite, Shaanxi 

Youthsun Co. Ltd., Shanghai Bloom 

International Trading Co., Ltd., 

Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd., 

Shanghai Hui Ai Mal Tose Co., Ltd., 

Sichuan–Dujiangyan Dubao Bee 

Industrial Co., Ltd., Silverstream 

International Co., Ltd., Tianjin Eulia 

Honey Co., Ltd., Wuhan Shino–Food 

Trade Co., Ltd., Wuhu Qinshi Tangye, 

and Xinjiang Jinhui Food Co., Ltd. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers for whom this review is 

being rescinded, as of the publication 

date of this notice, of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of