alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00109-CV

In the Interest of M. S.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 231913-C, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Kurios M. Harvey, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the

district court’s order establishing the parent-child relationship between Harvey and his biological

daughter, M.S., and ordering Harvey to pay child support. The notice of appeal was filed with this

Court on March 3, 2009.

The clerk’s and reporter’s records were due in this Court on May 14, 2009. On

June 10, 2009, we received notice from the court reporter that Harvey had not requested a reporter’s

record. We also received notice from the district clerk’s office that Harvey had neither paid, nor

made arrangements to pay, for the clerk’s record.

On July 15, 2009, this Court sent notice to Harvey’s last known address that the

clerk’s record was overdue. We requested that Harveymake arrangementsfor the record and submit

a status report regarding this appeal on or before July 27, 2009. We further informed appellant that

failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. On August 6,

2009, the notice was returned to this Court as undeliverable.
2

We have been unable to locate a forwarding address for Harvey. Nor have we

received any communication from Harvey in themore than six months since his notice of appeal was

filed. Because Harvey has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record, provided this Court

with a means to reach him, or contacted this Court in any manner in the more than six months

since his notice of appeal was filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: September 30, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION
         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Ridgefield Industries Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Qian Chao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: July 26, 2004

/s/ Qian Chao
----------------------------------
Qian Chao, Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer and principal
 accounting officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
I, John R. Schroll, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MonarchCommunity Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have;
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 12, 2004 By:  /s/ John R. Schroll       John R. SchrollPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<page>                                     EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry, Chief
Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By: /s/ Kevin Perry

Name: 	 Kevin Perry
Title:	 Chief Financial Officer

Date:	 March 31, 2005
John FERRIS, Claimant/Appellant, v. IMAGENET CONSULTING, LLC., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.

No. ED 106046

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: June 12, 2018

John Ferris, Appellant Acting Pro Se.

Meaghan P. Myers, P.O. Box 1527, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent DES.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

John Ferris ("Appellant") appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("the Commission") to affirm the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security's ("the Appeals Tribunal's") finding that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits from ImageNet Consulting, LLC ("ImageNet") because Appellant voluntarily left ImageNet-Appellant's former employer-without good cause.1 We find that the Commission's decision was supported by substantial and competent evidence. Accordingly, we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

"When the Commission adopts the decision of the Appeals Tribunal, the Court of Appeals considers the Appeals Tribunal's decision to be the decision of the Commission for purposes of review." *Wilson v. Progressive Waste Sols. of Mo, Inc.* , 515 S.W.3d 804, 807 (Mo. App. E.D. 2017).
14910-I3-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Fedend Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39 fhlfO-','j

mnAlSl51G

(Docket No. FAA-2009-1066; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-028-AD; Amendment" '"I

'" I.U, ~Jn

39-**;AD *1' 2.010- [O-()5" '"

"de·-' D

RfN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-1008,

747-1 OOBSUD, 747-200B, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

110.J

IHmAl.5J5IG,

•••ftf "

ACTION: Final rule. 0.0.1£

'-il~,1.'

SUMMARY: THe FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD), which OUIJO~S,.,.,t>ol

- applies to certain Model 747 airplanes. That AD currently requires repetitive inspections HmAL5/51G -

to detect cracking in certain fuselage skin lap joints, and repair if necessary. This new A A;:r~

expands the inspection area in the existing AD, adds a modification of certain lap joints, '11 (,(1

OUTT'IG SY'lBOl

and adds certain post-repair inspections of the lap joints. Accomplishing the modificatiOl

ends the repetitive inspections required by the existing AD for the length of lap joint tha

is modified. This AD results from a structural reYi.ewof affected skin lap joints for

widespread fatigue damage. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking in certai

lap joints, which could result in rapid depressurization of the airplane.

OATES: This AD becomes effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of

,

certain publications listed in the AD as o{[INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE 0

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
DESMOND v. The NEWS & OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY, et al.

132PA18-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

John A. Bussian, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for The News And Observer Publishing Company, et al.

James T. Johnson, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Desmond, Beth.

Chynna T. Smith, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Desmond, Beth.

Bradley R. Kutrow, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The News And Observer Publishing Company, et al.

Julia C. Ambrose, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for The News And Observer Publishing Company, et al.

William M. Wilson, III, Attorney at Law, for Professor William Van Alstyne.

Jonathan E. Buchan, Attorney at Law, for The Reporters Committee for Freedom of Press, et al.

Mark J. Prak, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for The News And Observer Publishing Company, et al.

Timothy Nelson, Attorney at Law, for The News And Observer Publishing Company, et al.

Wade M. Smith, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Locke, Mandy.

*826The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of June 2019 by Defendant (Mandy Locke) for Additional Time for Oral Argument:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 9 -00 109 -CV

In the Interestof M. S.

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ELL COUNTY , 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2319 13- C , HO NORAB LE GORDO N G. ADAMS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Kur ios M. Harve y , proce edi ng pro se, f iled a notice of

appea l from the district court’s orde r establi s hing the pare nt-child relationship between Ha rvey and his biologic al da ug hte r, M. S., and

or de ri ngHa

rv e y to p ay c hil d s up po rt . T he no tic e of a pp e a l w a s fi le d wi th t

his Court on March 3, 2009.

The c lerk’s a

nd repor ter’s r ecor ds were due in this Court on May 14, 2009. On J une 10, 2009, we rec eived notice from the c ourt repor ter that Harvey had not reque sted a re porter’ s
rec ord. We also re cei v ed noti ce f rom the district cler

k’s offic e that Ha

rvey had neither

paid, nor made a rra ng ements to pay , for the c lerk’s r ecor d. On J uly 15, 2009, this Court sent noti ce to Ha rvey ’s last known addr ess that the
c le rk ’s re c or d w a s o ve rd

ue . We re qu e ste d th a t H arv e y make arr ang e me nts fo r t he re c or d a

nd su bmi t a status re port reg ardingthis appeal on or be fore J uly 27, 2009. We further informed a ppellant that failure to do so may

result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of pr o secution. On August 6, 2009, the notice wa s returne d to this C ourt as undeliver able.2 We have be en unable t o l o ca t e a forwa rding addre ss for Ha

rvey . Nor have we
rec eived any communication from Har vey in the more than six months since his notice of appe al was filed. B eca

use Ha rvey has not paid or made arr ang ements to pay for the re cord, pr ovided this Court with a means to re ach him, or c ontacte d t h i s Court in any manner in the more than six mont hs since his notice of appea l was filed, we dism iss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and Pember

ton Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: September

30, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         632,904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  856,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,410,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,139,256
<PP&E>                                         267,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,254,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          187,817
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,051,698
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,254,070
<SALES>                                      3,977,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,977,965
<CGS>                                        2,163,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,794,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,533
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21

                             Subsidiaries of the Registrant(1)

                                                     State of       Percentage
                                                   Incorporation     Ownership
                                                   -------------    ---------- 
Farmers and Mechanics Bank                          United States       100%

FMS Financial Services, Inc.(2)                     New Jersey          100%

Land Financial Services, Inc.(2)                    New Jersey          100%

First Plunge, Inc. (3)                              New Jersey          100%

Fishpond, Inc. (3)                                  New Jersey          100%

Angell Ayes, Inc. (3)                               New Jersey          100%

Peter's Passion, Inc. (3)                           New Jersey          100%

Atlantic Adventures, Inc.(3)                        New Jersey          100%

(1)   The  operations  of the  subsidiaries  are  included  in the  consolidated
      financial  statements  contained  in the  Annual  Report  to  Stockholders
      attached as Exhibit 13 to the Form 10-K.

(2)   Subsidiary of Farmers and Mechanics Bank.
(3)   Subsidiary of Land Financial Services, Inc.
exv10w67






EXHIBIT 10.67




InterDigital

2010 Compensation Program for Outside Directors




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Board Retainer:
	 	$	40,000	 
	Chairman of the Board:
	 	$	50,000	 
	Audit Committee Chair:
	 	$	30,000	 
	All Other Committee Chairs:
	 	$	10,000	 
	Audit Committee Retainer:
	 	$	10,000	 
	All Other Committee Retainers:
	 	$	5,000	 
	Initial Election RSU Award:
	 	 	4,000 	   RSUs (vesting in full one year from grant date) 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual RSU Award:
	 	 	4,000 	   RSUs (vesting in full one year from grant date) 





All cash payments and RSU grants shall be based on service for a full year; pro rata payments and
grants shall be made for service of less than one year. Cash payments shall be made on a quarterly
basis. Payment of the annual Board and all committee retainers are subject to the director’s
attendance at the regularly scheduled quarterly meetings, as follows: 100% payment for
participating in person, 50% payment for participating telephonically, and no payment for not
participating.



Both cash payments and RSUs may be deferred. An election to defer must be made in the calendar
year preceding the year in which services are rendered and the compensation is earned (i.e.,
elections to defer must be made by December 31 of each year for the deferral to apply to the next
year’s cash payments and/or RSU award(s)).



Each initial election RSU award shall be granted on the date of the director’s initial election to
the Board. Annual RSU awards shall be granted on the date of each Annual Meeting of Shareholders.



The terms of this program shall be periodically reviewed.




January 2010
Elvis C. SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 105264

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: February 13, 2018

Ellen H. Flottman, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Movant/Appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

*932Elvis C. Smith appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2012, unless otherwise indicated.
exv10w46






EXHIBIT 10.46




Arbitron Inc. 2010 Board of Director Compensation



The Arbitron Non-Employee Board of Directors receive the following compensation for 2010:




	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer Fee

	 	$30,000
	 
	 	 
	Independent Chairman of the Board
Additional Annual Retainer

	 	 $85,000
	 
	 	 
	Committee Chair Retainer

	 	Audit Committee: $20,000
	 

	 	Technology Strategy Committee:
	 

	 	$20,000
	 

	 	Other Committees: $10,000
	 
	 	 
	Board Meeting Fees (In person or by telephone)

	 	$1,500
	 
	 	 
	Committee Meeting Fees (In person)

	 	$1,500
	 
	 	 
	Committee Meeting Fees (By telephone)

	 	$750
	 
	 	 
	Initial Deferred Stock Unit Award

	 	Each newly elected non-employee
director will receive a
one-time grant of 4,500
deferred stock units, which
deferred stock units will vest
in three equal installments of
1,500 deferred stock units over
a three-year period and will be
payable no sooner than six
months following the director’s
termination of service as a
director of the Company.
	 
	 	 
	Annual Deferred Stock Unit Awards

	 	Beginning the year after
initial election to the board
of directors, each continuing
non-employee director will
receive an annual grant of
$100,000 worth of deferred
stock units, which deferred
stock units will vest in three
equal installments over a
three-year period and will be
payable no sooner than six
months following the director’s
termination of service as a
director of the Company.





All cash retainer fees and meeting fees payable to non-employee directors may be paid, at the
election of each director, in the form of deferred stock units, in lieu of cash.