alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION



I, David J.Gallagher, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of QSound Labs, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the company and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.









/s/ David J. Gallagher



David J. Gallagher

President and Chief Executive Officer





March 30, 2004
Exhibit
      23.1





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The
      Board
      of Directors


Vineyard
      National Bancorp:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
      333-18217, No. 333-37040, No. 333-91882, No. 333-91884 and No.
      333-130355 each on
      Form S-8 of Vineyard National Bancorp and subsidiary of our reports dated March
      7, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Vineyard National
      Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated
      statements of income, stockholders’ equity and changes in comprehensive income,
      and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, and all related financial
      statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness
      of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which
      reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Vineyard
      National Bancorp and subsidiary.









*/s/
      KPMG LLP*




Orange
      County, CA


March
      7,
      2007
STATE of North Carolina v. Joe Robert REYNOLDS

No. 155P17-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Reynolds, Joe Robert.

Willliam P. Hart, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Joe Robert Reynolds, for Reynolds, Joe Robert.

C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th of February 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd of June 2019 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Withdrawn by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of June 2019 by Defendant to Supplement Petition with Affidavit of Facts:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of June 2019 by Defendant to Withdraw:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
Byron EWING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 105684

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: April 3, 2018

Byron Ewing-Pro Se, 2727 Highway K, Bonne Terre, MO 63628, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Byron Ewing (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment dismissing Movant's motion to amend a 2012 judgment denying post-conviction relief under Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.15 (2012). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of the motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).
Exhibit 10.63



 Exhibit 10.63 
 ATTACHMENT A 
 Promissory Note 

 

			
	U.S.$677,234.07	 	Washington, D.C.
		 	November 19, 2010

 The
undersigned, Intelsat Global S.A., a Luxembourg corporation (the “Company”), hereby promises to pay to Anita Beier, an individual (the “Payee”), the principal sum of Six Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand, Two Hundred
Thirty-Four Dollars and Seven Cents ($677,234.07) in five equal installments, without interest, on the following dates (each a “Payment Date”): 
  

					
	Scheduled Payment Date	  	Payment Amount	 
	 January 15, 2011
	  	$	135,446.83	  
	 July 15, 2011
	  	$	135,446.81	  
	 January 15, 2012
	  	$	135,446.81	  
	 July 15, 2012
	  	$	135,446.81	  
	 January 15, 2013
	  	$	135,446.81	  

 The Company may
prepay this Note, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty, and any such prepayments shall be applied to the remaining scheduled principal installments in direct order of maturity. Payments due hereunder are to be made by wire
transfer to such bank account of the Payee as the Payee may from time to time designate by written notice to the Company, in lawful money of the United States of America. 
 This is the note referred to in the Separation Agreement and Release by and between the Payee and Intelsat Corporation, dated November 19, 2010. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, no amounts
shall be payable hereunder, and this Note shall be null and void, if on any Payment Date the Payee is in breach of any obligation under the Severance Agreement or any other agreement between the Payee and the Company or Intelsat Corporation.

 No failure or delay on the part of the Payee in exercising any power or right hereunder, and no course of dealing between the
Company and the Payee, shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any such right or power, or any abandonment or discontinuance of steps to enforce such a right or power, preclude any other or further exercise
thereof or the exercise of any other right or power. 
 This Note may be amended and the observance of any term of this Note may
be waived only with the written consent of the Company and the Payee. The Payee may not, directly or indirectly, sell, transfer, pledge, assign, encumber or otherwise dispose of this Note in whole or in part. 







 This Note shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the contract
laws of the State of New York as if made and wholly performed within that state. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused
this Note to be made, executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer as of the day and year first written above. 
  

			
	INTELSAT GLOBAL S.A.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ PHILLIP SPECTOR

		 	Phillip L. Spector
		 	Executive Vice President and General Counsel


  

			
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
		
	By:	 	 /s/ ANITA BEIER

		 	Anita Beier
No. 09-9455.

#### Marco Green, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1056, 130 S. Ct. 2360,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3099.

176 L. Ed. 2d 575,

April 5, 2010.

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 347 Fed. Appx. 483.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**URANIUMRESOURCES, INC.**

650 S. Edmonds Lane, Suite 108,Lewisville, TX 75067

972.219.3330 Phone972.219.3311 Fax

www.uraniumresources.com

 

March 13, 2008

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 5 th  Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

 

I, Thomas H. Ehrlich, Vice President—Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer of Uranium Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A ofthe Company for the year ended December 31, 2006, which this certificationaccompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|  /s/ THOMAS H. EHRLICH                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas H.  Ehrlich                          |   |
| Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 13, 2008                              |   |

 

----
MAYOR 

1°. RandnlJ Halfacre 

MAYOR PRO-TEM 

Hazel Lcggeil-TyockU 

COUNCIL 

Danny Fra:£ier 

Knthy Maness 

ToddShevchik 

Ted .Slanihulilis 

Richard D. Thompson 

TOWN OF LEXINGTON 

III iMaiileii Laiif 

TOWTV ADMINISTRATOR 

D. Britt Poole 

MAILING ADDRE:S.S 

Post Office Boi 397 

Le:dngton,SC 29071 

INFORMATION 

803-359-4164 

»»w.le.\sc.com 

FAX 

803-359-4460 

August 20, 2010 

c=> 

I 

"— 

> 

O 

.N3 

u ; 

c^.incip' 

rn:z:-i: 

''^^3m 

g § ^ 

CO 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Acting Associate Director, X-50 

I.I.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Small Community Air Service Development Grant Application 

Docket OST-2010-0124 

Columbia Metropolitan Airport - Columbia, SC 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

The Town of Lexington strongly supports the above referenced grant application that will support 

new and improved air service from the Columbia Metropolitan Airport. The success of new 

service from the Columbia Metropolitan Airport is critically important to the health and growth of 

our business and the overall Columbia business community. 

Effective this date, the Town of Lexington has authorized a commitment of $3,000 for the 

purpose of assisting the Columbia Metropolitan Airport in obtaining additional scheduled 

commercial air service. The viability of air service improvements will provide a significant boost 

to economic development in our community through improved access for visitors, and most 

importantly, to support area businesses like ours. 

We are pleased to have the opportunity to support this grant application. 

Sincerely, 

alfacre. Mayor 

Lexington
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxford Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert
Harrison, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Robert Harrison
---------------------------
Robert Harrison
President, CEO AND CFO
November 11, 2003
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT AND CONSENT











The Board of Directors

QSound Labs, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-09228 and 333-82844) on Form S-8 of QSound Labs, Inc. of our report dated March 19, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of QSound Labs, Inc. as at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of QSound Labs, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.





(Signed) KPMG LLP





Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada

March 29, 2004
Prevailing academic view on compliance flexibility under section 111

Jason Schwartz to

:

LisaP Jackson, Gina McCarthy, Christian Fellner, Mary Johnson, RobertJ Wayland, 

Nick Hutson, Lanelle Wiggins, Kevin Culligan

Sent 

by:

jaschwartz@gmail.com

Cc: "Richardson, Nathan", "Burtraw, Dallas", Michael A Livermore, Michael Gerrard, Gregory Wannier

07/12/2011 10:50 AM

From: Jason Schwartz <jason.schwartz@nyu.edu> L

To: LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Gina McCarthy/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Christian Fellner/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary 

Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lanelle 

Wiggins/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Richardson, Nathan" <richardson@rff.org>, "Burtraw, Dallas" <Burtraw@rff.org>, Michael A Livermore 

<mlivermore@nyu.edu>, Michael Gerrard <MGerra@law.columbia.edu>, Gregory Wannier <gwanni@law.columbia.edu>

Sent by: jaschwartz@gmail.com

Dear Administrator Jackson, Assistant Administrator McCarthy, and EPA officials:

Please find attached a document describing areas of general academic agreement on EPA's 

authority to use compliance flexibility options under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, for your 

consideration in the development of performance standards for greenhouse gas emissions.

Sincerely,

Jason Schwartz & Michael Livermore, Institute for Policy Integrity, NYU School of Law

Michael Gerrard & Gregory Wannier, Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia Law School

Dallas Burtraw & Nathan Richardson, Resources for the Future

Jason A Schwartz, Legal Director

Institute for Policy Integrity

New York University School of Law

Wilf Hall, Room 317

139 MacDougal Street, New York, NY 10012

(212) 998-6093

www.policyintegrity.org

Prevailing Academic View on Sec 111 Flexibility.pdf
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I,
Younglin Du, Chief Executive Officer, and President, of Dahua, Inc. (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period March 31, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Younglin DuYounglin
      Du, CEO and
President





Date: May
15, 2010
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7707

JOSHUA ANDERSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
MARK BOLSTER , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O ’ Grady, Senior District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 00075

- LO

- TCB )

Submitted : July 26, 2022 Decided: Octcober 4, 2022

Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Joshua Anderson , Appellant Pro Se. Matthew James Mezger , Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 20-7707 Doc: 20 Filed: 10/04/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Joshua Gary Anderson appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged his convictions by a general

court

- martial. We have reviewed the r ecord and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Anderson’s motions to file supplemental informal briefs, we affirm the
court’s orders

. Anderson v. Bolster , No. 1:19

- cv - 00075

- LO

- TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 4 , 2020; filed Aug. 27 , 2020 & entered Aug. 28, 2020). We deny Anderson’s motion to substitute party, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional proc ess.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 20-7707 Doc: 20 Filed: 10/04/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7729** 

ROBERT L. HEDRICK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL’S SERVICE , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00532

- LMB

- MSN )

Submitted : March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Robert L. Hedrick, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert L. Hedrick appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b ) (20 12 ). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Hedrick’s motion for transcript at government expense and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hedrick v. U.S. Marshal’s Serv. , No. 1:15

- cv 00532

- LMB

- MSN (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jacinta Sit, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Oxford Technologies, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.







|                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Jacinta Sit                                               | 
|Jacinta Sit, President                                        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) | 



Date:   May 16, 2008