alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.8**

 

Mr. Thomas Leitnaker

 

Dear Tom,

 

It is with pleasure that I present thiscorrespondence to confirm the decision of William Pracht, The East Kansas theBoard of Directors President, and myself, the offer of employment as ourFacility Controller. Your employment will commence on June 29, 2005.You will be paid on a salary basis, on our normal payroll intervals, at theannual rate of Seventy-seven Thousand Five-Hundred Dollars ($77,500.00). Duringyour initial year of employment, you will be eligible for payincreases/increments based on formal individual performance appraisals fromWilliam Pracht and myself, one (1) performance every six (6) monthsof employment. You will also be eligible for payment of an annual bonus basedon performance overall financial performance of the corporation based onbudgeted guidelines. We look forward to your addition of as a team member ofthe East Kansas Agri-Energy family. The standard benefits package previouslydescribed by Diane Allen, will be sent to your attention. We look forward toyou joining the East Kansas Agri-Energy team. Please let me know if you needany additional information from Bill Pracht or me.

 

 
| Sincerely,                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                    |
| /s/ Michael D. Goblirsch                                                                | 6/23/2005 |   |
| Michael D. Goblirsch                                                                    |
|                                                                                    |
| General Manager – East Kansas  Agri-Energy, LLC                                    |
|                                                                                    |
| For The President of the  Board of Directors — East Kansas Agri – Energy, LLC |
|                                                                                    |
| /s/ Thomas Leitnaker                                                                    | 6/21/05 |   |
| Thomas Leitnaker                                                                        |

 

 

 

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  May 17, 2007

 

/s/ Barry Lamperd                                                          

Barry Lamperd

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal 

Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



                             CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the quarterly report of Oxford Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Jacinta Sit, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 15, 2004


/s/ Jacinta Sit
-----------------------------------------
Jacinta Sit, President
(principal executive officer and principal
 financial officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Roman, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 583]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered March 2, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts, one count each of intentional murder and felony murder), intimidating a victim or witness in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (three counts), and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 25 years to life on each of his convictions of murder in the second degree, an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 8V3 to 25 years for his conviction of intimidating a victim or witness in the first degree to run concurrently with the sentences imposed for murder in the second degree, an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 8V3 to 25 years for his conviction of burglary in the first degree to run consecutively to the sentence imposed for muder in the second degree (under the count charging intentional murder), indeterminate terms of imprisonment of IV3 to 4 years on each of his convictions of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree to run consecutively to each other and to the sentences imposed on his convictions of intentional murder and burglary in the first degree, and a determinate term of one year imprisonment for his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree to run concurrently with the other sentences.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that the term of imprisonment imposed on the defendant’s conviction of burglary in the first degree shall run concurrently with the term of imprisonment imposed on his conviction of murder in the second degree under count one of the indictment (intentional murder); as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly allowed a pretrial amendment to the indictment. The amendment did not change the People’s theory of the case which was that the defendant intentionally caused the victim’s *486death by battering her head *(see, People v Rodriguez,*181 AD2d 840).

However, the defendant’s sentence for burglary in the first degree must be modified to run concurrently with the sentence imposed for his conviction of intentional murder. The act which caused the physical injury to the victim for the purposes of the count charging the defendant with burglary in the first degree also caused her death *(see,*Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; *People v Laureano,*87 NY2d 640; *People v Marro, 225*AD2d 796). Altman, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of the NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 7, 2009 starting at 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Arrive in FAA Lobby at 8:30 a.m. for visitor check in. 

# ADDRESSES:

FAA Auditorium, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-9434; Web site                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task Force meeting. The agenda will include: 
    - Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions)
    - Work Group and Subgroup Status Reports and Planned Activities
    - Discussion and Next Steps
    - Closing Plenary (Other Business, Document Production, Date and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn)

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                 

      ( print page 10802)    
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 5, 2009. 

Francisco Estrada C., 

RTCA Advisory Committee.

 [FR Doc. E9-5284 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### T. LACY WILLIAMS, Administrator of the Estate of M. M. REYNOLDS, Deceased, v. L. R. POWELL, JR., and HENRY W. ANDERSON, Receivers of the SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.

(Filed 11 November, 1942.)

Appeal by defendants from *Oarr, J.,*at May Term, 1942, of Wake.

Civil action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants.

Defendants demurred to the complaint upon the ground that it does not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that it appears from the facts alleged that plaintiff’s intestate, by his own negligence, contributed to his death.

Demurrer overruled, defendants appeal and assign error.

*W. H. Yarborough, Jr., for plaintiff.*

*Murray Allen for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

Upon an examination of the allegations in the complaint filed in this action, we think the judgment of the court below should be affirmed under the authority of and for the reasons stated in the opinion in *Ramsey v. Furniture Co.,*209 N. C., 165, 183 S. E., 536.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 2

- 1946 LT Case No s

. 2015

- CF

- 003726

- AX

2015

- CF

- 003264

- AX 2021

- CF

- 004142

- AX

_____________________________
M ICHAEL F ITCH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County

. Anthon y Michael Tatti, Judge

.
Jessica J. Travis, of DefendBrevard .com , Melbourne, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, fo r Appellee.

October 31, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W ALLIS , E ISNAUGLE , and H ARRIS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 58237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24056]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 58237]]

ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Committee on Rulemaking

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a public meeting of the Committee on 
Rulemaking of the Assembly of the Administrative Conference of the 
United States. The committee will meet to discuss a recommendation 
concerning agency innovations in e-Rulemaking for consideration by the 
full Conference. Complete details regarding the committee meeting, a 
related research report, how to attend (including information about 
remote access and obtaining special accommodations for persons with 
disabilities), and how to submit comments to the committee can be found 
in the ``Research'' section of the Conference's Web site, at http://www.acus.gov. Click on ``Research'' -> ``Conference Projects'' -> 
``Agency Innovations in e-Rulemaking.''
    Comments may be submitted by e-mail to Comments@acus.gov, with 
``Committee on Rulemaking'' in the subject line, or by postal mail to 
``Committee on Rulemaking Comments'' at the address given below. To be 
guaranteed consideration, comments must be received no later than five 
calendar days before the meeting.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at 1120 20th Street, NW., Suite 
706 South, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Schleicher Bremer, Designated 
Federal Officer, Administrative Conference of the United States, 1120 
20th Street, NW., Suite 706 South, Washington, DC 20036; Telephone 202-
480-2080.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee on Rulemaking will meet to 
consider a draft recommendation concerning agency innovations in e-
Rulemaking. The committee will discuss topics such as using agency 
websites and social media to promote participation in rulemaking 
proceedings and improving access to rulemaking information on agency 
websites.

DATES: Thursday, October 6, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Designated Federal Officer: Emily Schleicher Bremer.

    Dated: September 15, 2011.
Jonathan R. Siegel,
Director of Research & Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-24056 Filed 9-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6110-01-P
```
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7099

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DONALD OMAR FAZEL, a/k/a Rodney Dickerson, a/k/a Roscoe Barnes , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga , Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cr
- 00014

- AJT

- 1 ; 1:17

- cv
- 01447

- AJT )

Submitted : December 1 6 , 2021 Decided: December 20, 2021

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Donald Omar Fazel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Donald Omar Fazel seeks to appeal the district court’s June 30, 2021, order
(1) directing the Government to respond to the unresolved claims from Fazel’s initial

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion; (2) denying Fazel’s motion to appoint counsel; and
(3) c onstruing Fazel’s motions to amend his initial § 2255 motion as successive § 2255 motions and dismissing them for lack of jurisdiction . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S.
541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Fazel seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. * Accordingly, we deny as moot Fazel’s motion
to expedite and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* M otion s seeking to raise additional § 2255 claims prior to the district court’s final adjudication of the first § 2255 motion are properly construed as motion s to amend, Farabee v. Clarke , 967 F.3d 380, 389 (4th Cir. 2020) , and the denial of a motion to amend is not immediately appealable, Bridges v. Dep’t of Md. State Police , 441 F.3d 197, 206 (4th Cir. 2006)

. The denial of a motion to appoint counsel is also not immediately appealable. Miller v. Simmons , 814 F.2d 962, 9 64 (4th Cir. 1987).
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Edward HUGHES, Defendant/Appellant.

No. ED 105700

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: June 5, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 9, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018

Nathan J. Aquino, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Plaintiff/Respondent.

Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Defendant/Appellant.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Edward Hughes appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, unlawful possession of a firearm in the presence of heroin, three counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Sharon CRANE, Appellant, v. Bartholomew SARACINO, Respondent.

No. ED 105041

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: April 3, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 7, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018

Leonard P. Cervantes, Jennifer Suttmoeller, Michael T. Flachs, Jr., 1007 Olive Street, 4th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.

Bruce A. Moothart, Deena B. Jenab, 4801 Main Street, Suite 310, Kansas City, MO 64112, for Respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

*491Sharon Crane ("Appellant") brought suit against Bartholomew Saracino ("Respondent"), alleging she sustained injuries following a slip and fall on property owned by Respondent. Appellant appeals from the trial court's judgment, following a jury trial, in favor of Respondent.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).