alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w5






Exhibit 10.5




     The following summarizes the 2010 Executive Compensation Program approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Jefferies Group, Inc. for the following
executive officers:



	 	 	 
	Peregrine C. Broadbent
	 	 
	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 
	Salary:

	 	$1,000,000 
	Bonus Range:

	 	Discretionary*
	Long-term Equity Incentive:

	 	$0 
	 
	 	 
	Charles J. Hendrickson
	 	 
	Treasurer
	 	 
	Salary:

	 	$250,000 
	Bonus Range:

	 	Discretionary*
	Long-term Equity Incentive:

	 	$0 
	 
	 	 
	Lloyd H. Feller
	 	 
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
	 	 
	Salary:

	 	$900,000 
	Annual Bonus Range:

	 	$0 — $1.3 million**
	Long-term Equity Incentive:

	 	7,308.4 restricted stock units
(adjusted for the May 15, 2006
two-for-one stock split effected
as a stock dividend), as a
long-term equity grant for each
of 2006 through 2010 (valued at
$200,000 for each year) were
granted on February 1, 2006
representing part of the
executive’s 2006 through 2010
compensation. The aggregate
36,542 restricted stock units
(as adjusted) were subject to
2006 performance criteria and
vested 20% on each of February
1, 2007, February 1, 2008,
February 1, 2009 and February 1,
2010 and will vest 20% on
December 15, 2010.








 




			
	*	 	The Compensation Committee may choose to pay all or a portion of the bonus, if any, in cash,
restricted stock or restricted stock units.
	 
	**	 	The amount of Mr. Feller’s bonus will be dependent on earnings per share, return on equity and
pre-tax profit margin for 2010. These financial measures are to be calculated using consolidated
results from continuing operations of Jefferies Group, Inc. All financial results will 




 









 









be adjusted
to add back the negative effect of extraordinary transactions (e.g. mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures), if any, occurring during the year. Formulas were approved by the
Compensation Committee for Mr. Feller which provide for no annual bonus if minimum threshold levels
of performance are not achieved and maximum bonus if performance equals or exceeds the top
performance threshold level. In all, six threshold levels of performance and corresponding bonus
amounts were approved for Mr. Feller by the Compensation Committee. Company performance falling
between set threshold levels of performance are expected to result in an amount of bonus
interpolated between such set threshold levels of performance.



The Compensation Committee reserved the right to take into consideration additional performance
measures in determining whether to reduce the calculated bonus award. The Compensation Committee
may choose to pay all or a portion of the bonus in cash, restricted stock or restricted stock
units. The Compensation Committee does not have discretion to increase awards above the maximum
amount provided.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Cannon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Solectron Corporation on Form 10-K for the annual period ended August
27, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Solectron Corporation.

Date:   November 5, 2004

                                        /s/ Michael Cannon
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael Cannon
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Barbara Ferrusi, Respondent, v Suburban Propane Corporation et al., Defendants, and National Propane Company of Brewster, Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party *448Action.)

[719 NYS2d 591]

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant National Propane Company of Brewster, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered February 9, 2000, as granted the plaintiffs motion for a protective order and denied its cross motion to compel disclosure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion for a protective order, and denying its cross motion to compel disclosure *(see,*CPLR 3103; *Scalone v Phelps Mem. Hosp. Ctr.,*184 AD2d 65, 70). The privileged records which the appellant seeks are completely unrelated to the decedent’s death in a gasoline explosion. The plaintiff did not waive the applicable privileges by commencing this action to recover damages for the pecuniary loss suffered by the decedent’s child *(see,*CPLR 4504, 4507, 4508; *see also, Strong v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Ctr.,*240 AD2d 726; *cf., Prink v Rockefeller Ctr.,*48 NY2d 309; *Freeman v Corbin Ave. Bus Co.,*60 AD2d 824). Krausman, J. P., Luciano, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
exv10w33






Exhibit 10.33




AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO THE

THE CHUBB CORPORATION

ASSET MANAGERS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN (2005)




     Pursuant to the authority reserved in Section 8(k) of The Chubb Corporation Asset Managers
Incentive Compensation Plan (2005) (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     1. Effective January 1, 2009, the definition of “Qualified Termination” under Section 2 shall
be revised to read as follows:



     “Qualified Termination” means termination of employment due to death, becoming “Disabled” (as
defined in the Pension Plan), retirement on or after the Participant attains his or her “Early
Retirement Age” or “Normal Retirement Date” (both as defined in the Pension Plan), or any other
reason with the consent of the Committee.”



     2. Effective January 1, 2009, Section 8(h)(iii) shall be revised to read as follows:



          “(iii) Except as otherwise determined by the OCC in its sole discretion, a Participant who
experiences a Qualified Termination on or after the first day of the seventh month (but on or
before the last day) of a Long-Term Award Segment shall receive a prorated portion of his or her
Long-Term Award, with the amount of the Long-Term Award determined based on performance through the
date of the Qualified Termination. A Participant’s prorated Long-Term Award shall be determined by
multiplying the amount of the Long-Term Award by a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the
number of full calendar months from the start of the Long-Term Award Segment through the date of
the Qualified Termination, and the denominator of which shall be 60.”




     3. All other provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Chubb Corporation has caused this amendment to be duly executed on
this            day of                      2009.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE CHUBB CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Name:
	 	/s/ W. Andrew Macan
 

W. Andrew Macan
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President, Corporate Counsel


and Secretary
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Chief Financial Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
each hereby certifies that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:



| | /s/MICHAEL L. CAMPBELLMichael L. Campbell
Co-Chief Executive Officer
November 10, 2003
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/KURT C. HALLKurt C. Hall
Co-Chief Executive Officer
November 10, 2003              
| | /s/AMY E. MILESAmy E. Miles
Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2003                 

---

QuickLinks
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 06/26/2015 9:04:36 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES HODGE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-0859

[November 30, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Timothy L. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

17011832CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.32









Exhibit No. 10.32




January 8, 2010




PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL




Frank J. Ready

AFP Americas




Subject: 2010 Compensation




Dear Frank:




The Management Development and Compensation Committee approved the following compensation changes
for you effective January 1, 2010.




Base Salary:




Your annualized base salary will increase 11% to $500,000.




Annual Incentive Target:




Your Management Achievement Plan target will increase from 70% to 75%, for an annual target of
$375,000.




Long-Term Incentive:




Your long-term incentive target will increase from 180% to 200%, for a target award value of
$1,000,000 starting with the February 2010 grant. In addition, the Committee granted you a
Restricted Stock Award. This award consists of 12,500 shares of time-based Restricted Stock of
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and is made under the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan; the
award will be granted effective January 8, 2010.




Restrictions will lapse on this Restricted Stock Award on December 31, 2012. If Armstrong makes
cash dividend payments during this period, you will accrue an amount equal to the dividend payment
in a non-interest bearing account. You will receive a cash payment for the accrued dividends when
the restrictions lapse on the underlying Restricted Stock Award.




Shares of AWI stock will be distributed to you when the restriction period expires. The Company
will use share tax withholding to satisfy your tax obligations unless you decide to remit payment
for all applicable taxes.




The Internal Revenue Code (Section 83(b)) provides the option to pay the federal income tax now
rather than when the restrictions lapse. You should consult with your personal tax advisor on the
merits and risks of making an 83(b) election.




You would forfeit unvested shares and accrued dividends in the event of voluntary or involuntary
resignation, retirement, or termination for willful, deliberate, or gross misconduct. Shares
automatically vest in the event of long-term disability or death.




Cash Retention:




You will receive two cash retention payments for a total of $1,500,000. The first payment of
$1,000,000 will be made to you on January 1, 2012 and the second payment of $500,000 will be made
on January 1, 2013. The payments will not be counted for purposes of benefit determination. If
you are involuntarily terminated for reasons other than unacceptable performance or misconduct
prior to the scheduled payment dates, you will receive the full retention payment. However, if
your employment with the Company ends prior to the payment date because of your resignation or
other voluntary termination, you will not receive the payments.



 


 









 








Frank, we are committed to retaining the key employees who are vital to the successful future of
our business. I hope this personalized recognition conveys my appreciation for your many
contributions and acknowledges your importance to Armstrong.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Michael D. Lockhart
 	 
	 	Michael D. Lockhart 	 
	 	Chairman & CEO
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 15, 2020

t0408

Order 

Clerk

April 15, 2020

159443 & (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159443

COA: 347375 

Wayne CC: 18-006163-FC

MARCUS WAYNE MARTIN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of September 25, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer 

the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On 

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is 

again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED, without 

prejudice to the defendant’s right to file a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to 

MCR Subchapter 6.500 that may include the issues raised for the first time in this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 1997 and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000840319                        
<NAME>APHTON CORPORATION                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                        8,846
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 9,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          850
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (634) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               18,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      (3,902) 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                    (26,665)
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1,098)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                (18,362)
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                271
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 5,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (5,494)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (135)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (5,629)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.43)
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
PAFT: HFC-32

http://www.afeas.org/paft/hfc-32.html [20/07/2011 17:32:05] 

### Summary of Testing Results HFC-32 has very low acute and subchronic inhalation toxicity. HFC-32 is not a developmental toxicant. HFC-32 is not mutagenic. 

### PAFT Programme for Alternative Fluorocarbon Toxicity Testing

HFC-32 is one of a series of fluorocarbon alternatives being studied as part of the Programme for Alternative Fluorocarbon Toxicity Testing (PAFT) . HFC-32 is being considered primarily as an alternative, in blends, for refrigeration systems. HFC-32 has very low toxicity by inhalation. The lowest concentration that causes mortality in experimental animals -- the approximate lethal concentration (ALC) -- for a 4-hour exposure is greater than 760,000 ppm (76%). Anaesthetic-like effects, such as lethargy and incoordination, are observed in rats at very high inhalation concentrations (greater than 110,000 ppm).As with many other halocarbons and hydrocarbons, inhalation of HFC32 followed by intravenous injection of epinephrine, which simulates human stress reactions, results in a cardiac sensitization response in experimental screening studies with dogs. This cardiac sensitization response is observed at approximately 350,000 ppm of HFC-32, a level well above expected exposures. By comparison, a cardiac sensitization response is observed with CFC-11 at approximately 5,000 ppm, and with CFC-12 at approximately 50,000 ppm. In repeated inhalation exposure studies, the low toxicity of HFC-32 continues to be evident. No adverse effects were observed in rats exposed by inhalation at concentrations of up to 50,000 ppm for up to 90 days. Inhalation developmental toxicity studies with rats and rabbits have been completed. The results indicate that HFC-32 is not teratogenic, and does not cause fetal effects at inhalation concentrations of up to 50,000 ppm. In genetic toxicity testing, HFC-32 was not mutagenic in an Ames assay, a Chinese Hamster Lung (CHL) assay, or a chromosomal aberration study with human lymphocytes. These studies were in vitro assays. Also, HFC-32 was not active in an in vivo mouse micronucleus study. Metabolism studies with HFC-32 have indicated only very low levels of metabolism (less than 0.5%). The testing of HFC-32 under PAFT V has been completed. The results are summarized in the sidebar above. An exposure limit of 1,000 ppm (8-hour time-weighted average) for HFC-32 has been recommended by the American Industrial Hygiene Association's Workplace Environmental Exposure Limit (WEEL) Committee.
As for all chemicals, PAFT recommends that exposures be kept to a practicable minimum. September 1995

Last updated October 11, 1996
DEVANTE GLOVER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2912

Opinion filed November 3, 2014.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Devante Glover, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits. 

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2




               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Georgia Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Georgia
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
related statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Georgia Bancshares,
Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.



                                                     \s\PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP



Atlanta, Georgia
February 3, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5530 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5530

                   To lengthen Daylight Savings Time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   To lengthen Daylight Savings Time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 110(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(a) Amendment.--Section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 
U.S.C. 260a(a)) is amended--
            ``(1) by striking `April' and inserting `March'; and
            ``(2) by striking `October' and inserting `November'.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC (the“Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jill Zimmerman, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   /s/ Jill Zimmerman        |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Dated:  August 16, 2004          |

 

----