alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 549 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 549

 To amend the basic pay provisions of title 37, United States Code, to 
 ensure pay equity for enlisted members of the reserve components who 
 are selected to attend the United States Military Academy Preparatory 
  School, the United States Naval Academy Preparatory School, or the 
          United States Air Force Academy Preparatory School.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2005

Mr. Holt (for himself, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, and Mr. 
   Pallone) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the basic pay provisions of title 37, United States Code, to 
 ensure pay equity for enlisted members of the reserve components who 
 are selected to attend the United States Military Academy Preparatory 
  School, the United States Naval Academy Preparatory School, or the 
          United States Air Force Academy Preparatory School.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC PAY RATES FOR RESERVE COMPONENTS MEMBERS SELECTED TO 
              ATTEND MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMY PREPARATORY SCHOOLS.

    (a) Pay Equity for Reserves.--Section 203(e)(2) of title 37, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``on active duty for a period of more than 
        30 days shall continue to receive'' and inserting ``shall 
        receive''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``or at the rate provided for cadets and midshipmen 
        under subsection (c), whichever is greater''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first month beginning on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION*
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Vineyard National Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigneds hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigneds best knowledge and belief:
 
 (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated this 22nd day of March, 2004.
 Vineyard National Bancorp("Company")/s/ *Norman A. Morales*Norman A. MoralesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 /s/ *Gordon Fong*Gordon FongSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 
 ___________________
 
 *A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12


                             JORDAN INDUSTRIES, INC.
                             -----------------------
             COMPUTATIONS OF THE RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
             -------------------------------------------------------
                             (dollars in thousands)
                             ----------------------



                                                Year Ended December 31,
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                        2002            2001            2000
                                       ------          ------          ------
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense                   $ 89,372        $ 91,344        $ 92,009
   Rental expenses included in
     fixed charges                       6,031           6,016           5,374
                                       --------        --------        --------
            Total Fixed Charges         95,403          97,360          97,383
Earnings:
   Pre-tax income (loss)               (35,984)        (64,001)        (38,884)
   Plus: fixed charges                  95,403          97,360          97,383
                                       --------        --------        --------
            Total Earnings              59,419          33,359          58,499
                                       --------        --------        --------

Deficiency                            $(35,984)       $(64,001)       $(38,884)
                                      =========       =========       =========
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241, AS ADOPTED 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

I, Michael A. Gerlich, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the “Registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 7, 2007
exv10w13w1






Exhibit 10.13.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

THE 2009 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

OF LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 2009 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN OF LEAP WIRELESS
INTERNATIONAL, INC. (this “Amendment”), dated as of January 14, 2010, is made and adopted
by LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized
terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan
(as defined below).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS,
the Company maintains The 2009 Employment Inducement Equity Incentive
Plan of Leap Wireless International, Inc. (as amended to date, the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth below;



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.2 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended by the Board of
Directors of the Company; and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved this Amendment pursuant to
resolutions adopted on January 14, 2010.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as
follows:



     1. Section 2.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:




     2.1 Shares Subject to Plan. The shares of stock subject to Awards
shall be Common Stock, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10.3. Subject
to adjustment as provided in Section 10.3, the aggregate number of such shares which
may be issued with respect to Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed
400,000. The shares of Common Stock issuable with respect to such Awards may be
either previously authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.



     2. This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. All
other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified
herein. The Plan, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed.



     I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of
Leap Wireless International, Inc. on January 14, 2010.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	                                                     /s/ Robert J. Irving, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Robert J. Irving, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Secretary
#### James Caffrey et al., Appellants, v Morse Diesel International, Respondent.

[719 NYS2d 597]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated March 22, 2000, as, in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action, determined that Industrial Code [12 NYCRR] § 23-1.7 (e) is not applicable to this action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiffs appeal from certain statements contained in an order denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ Labor Law § 241(6) cause of action. Since the order denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs are not aggrieved, even though they disagree with the findings of the Supreme Court *(see, Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ.,*60 NY2d 539, 544-545; *Schadoff v Russ,*278 AD2d 222; *Atlantic Hudson Realty v Rhodes,*271 AD2d 558). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00256-CR

Jeffrey LEE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR6806

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On September 26, 2014, appellant’s appointed attorney, Mr. Karl Basile, filed a motion to 

withdraw as appellate counsel. Mr. Basile states appellant filed a grievance against him, which 

was dismissed on September 8, 2014, but appellant has decided to appeal the dismissal. We 

GRANT the motion to withdraw.

Appellant, whose brief is currently due on October 9, 2014, is now without 

representation. We therefore ORDER that this appeal is ABATED to the trial court. See Duncan 

v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (holding that appellate courts may abate 

appeals so that trial court can assure appellant has effective assistance of counsel). We remand 

the cause to the trial court for it to make appropriate findings and rule on these issues:

(1) Does appellant desire to prosecute his appeal?

(2) Is appellant indigent? If appellant is indigent and desires to prosecute his 

appeal, the trial court should take steps necessary to ensure effective 

assistance of counsel, including the appointment of new counsel, if 

necessary. If appellant desires to proceed pro se, the trial court is directed 

to determine appellant’s ability and capacity to knowingly and 

intelligently waive his right to counsel. See Ex parte Davis, 818 S.W.2d 

64, 66-68 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1987). The trial should consider whether allowing 

appellant to proceed pro se on appeal is in the best interests of the 

appellant and the government. Martinez v. California, 528 U.S. 152, 120 

S. Ct. 684, 691-92 145 L. Ed.2d 597 (2000). 
 

We further ORDER he trial court to file in this court, no later than October 29, 2014, (1) 

a reporter’s record of the hearing, and (2) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the court’s 

written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the above issues.

All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further notice from this court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 23.1
 
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  ClearOne Communications, Inc.
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-148789 and 333-137859 of ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our financial statement audit report dated September 2, 2008, except for Note 21 as to which the date is September 4, 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 of ClearOne Communications,
Inc. for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
  /s/ Jones Simkins, P.C.
  JONES SIMKINS, P.C.
  Logan, Utah
  October 5, 2009
exv10w36






Exhibit 10.36




Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation




     For fiscal 2009, the compensation for the non-employee directors of The Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. (Group Inc.) consisted of:




	 	•	 	a $75,000 annual retainer awarded on February 5, 2010 as 487 fully vested restricted
stock units (RSUs) to each non-employee director of Group Inc., other than James J.
Schiro, who became a director in May 2009 and received a prorated retainer of $50,000
as 325 fully vested RSUs;
	 
	 	•	 	a $25,000 committee chair fee awarded on February 5, 2010 as 163 fully vested RSUs
to each committee chair; and
	 
	 	•	 	the following annual grants awarded on February 5, 2010:






	 	•	 	10,000 fully vested stock options (Options) for each of John H. Bryan,
Stephen Friedman, Rajat K. Gupta, James A. Johnson, Lakshmi N. Mittal and Ruth
J. Simmons;
	 
	 	•	 	1,250 fully vested RSUs and 5,000 fully vested Options for each of Claes
Dahlbäck, William W. George and Lois D. Juliber; and
	 
	 	•	 	a prorated grant of 1,667 fully vested RSUs for Mr. Schiro.





     Non-employee directors (other than Mr. Schiro, who joined during the year) elected whether to
receive the annual grants in RSUs, Options, or a combination of RSUs and Options. RSUs granted to
non-employee directors for fiscal 2009 services are fully vested and provide for delivery of the
underlying shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (Common Stock), of Group Inc. on the
first eligible trading day in the third quarter of the year following the year of the non-employee
director’s retirement from the Group Inc. board of directors (the Board). Options granted to
non-employee directors for fiscal 2009 services are fully vested and have an exercise price of
$154.16, the closing price-per-share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on February 5,
2010, the date of grant. The Options generally will expire in February 2014. One-third of the
Options generally become exercisable in each of January 2011, January 2012 and January 2013,
provided that all of the Options become exercisable on the date the non-employee director ceases to
be a member of the Board.



     The Board, upon the recommendation of Group Inc.’s Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee, has a policy on stock ownership that requires each non-employee director to beneficially
own at least 5,000 shares of Common Stock or fully vested RSUs within two years of becoming a
director. All non-employee directors of Group Inc. are in compliance with this policy.



     Non-employee directors of Group Inc. are permitted to participate in Group Inc.’s employee
matching gift program on the same terms as employees generally. Under the program for 2009, Group
Inc. matched gifts of up to $20,000 in the aggregate per participating individual.



     Non-employee directors receive no compensation other than directors’ fees.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt
Associates, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       |  |     |  |                          
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: February 1, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert A. Schriesheim
|                       |  |     |  | Robert A. Schriesheim    
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Hewitt Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hewitt Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
#### Lee Wriston *v.*State Compensation Commissioner *et al.*

(No. 7420)

Submitted September 13, 1932.

Decided September 20, 1932.

*England <& Ritchie,*for relator.

*H. B. Lee,*Attorney General, and *R. Dennis Steed,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Litz, Judge:

Lee Wriston seeks a peremptory writ of mandamus, requiring the state compensation commissioner to grant him a hearing upon his claim for additional compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

*536Wriston sustained serious personal injury December 13, 1929, in the course of and resulting from bis employment as coal miner for Kingston-Poeahontas Coal Company. After receiving temporary compensation for 52 weeks, on January 14, 1931, without being given a formal bearing, be was notified by the commissioner that be would not be granted further relief. By letter dated January 24, 1931, claimant, by counsel, protested the closing of bis case, and requested that be be permitted to introduce evidence showing a progressive disability resulting from the' injury. He was examined by the' medical department of the compensation department February 17, 1931, and later, again advised by the .commissioner that the evidence did not warrant further compensation. Wriston was examined April 14, 1932, by Dr. J. E. Coleman and Dr. A. A. Wingrove of Fayetteville, who were of opinion that he was totally incapacitated as a result of the injury. Dr. R. II. Walker of Charleston, after examining claimant on April 22, 1932, stated: “The infirmities due to his age and occupation have been aggravated by his injury to an extent that he is unable to work. He is totally disabled.” May 10, 1932, claimant filed a formal petition with the commissioner, alleging that the progressive nature of his disability resulting from the injury had rendered him permanently and totally disabled, and requesting a hearing in order that he might be fully compensated. At the instance of the commissioner, J. S. Edmundson, an inspector of the compensation department, investigated the claim in June, 1932. By memorandum dated July 9, 1932, Dr. Russell Kessel, chief medical examiner for the compensation department, reported to the commissioner that after an examination of the evidence he was of opinion that claimant had been fully compensated. A final order, entered by the commissioner, July 13, 1932, refusing to award claimant further compensation, was duly protested by him.

The complaint of claimant is, in substance, that the commissioner has wrongfully refused him a hearing upon the claim that his injury is progressive, which amounts to an allegation of a new case going to the basis of his right to compensation. The state compensation commissioner may be *537compelled by mandamus to grant a bearing on an application for a supplemental award to compensate the claimant for a disability arising subsequent to the initial award and not then considered in fixing the amount of compensation. *Hall*v. *Compensation Commissioner,*109 W. Va. 230, 153 S. E. 510; *Edwards*v. *Compensation Commissioner,*111 W. Va. 349, 161 S. E. 615.

The writ is, therefore, awarded.

*Writ awarded.*