alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 20, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130879 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130879 

 COA: 268380 

Wayne CC: 05-007291-01

PAUL RUSSELL GRIESSEL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand to the trial court to allow defendant to withdraw his plea. 

s0913 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 20, 2006 

 Clerk
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

Room 1E-245 February 6, 2008



### Purpose

Th e Department is holding this informal public meeting as a first step in the standards rulemaking process for fluorescent lamp ballasts. This meeting is intended to familiarize interested stakeholders with the approach and analytical tools that the DOE proposes to use in its analysis for proposed standards for fluorescent lamp ballasts. The meeting will solicit feedback on the assumptions, methodology, and analytical tools DOE proposes to use in this rulemaking.



### Agenda

9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome

9:05 - 9:20 am Introductions, and Agenda Review

9:20 - 9:40 am Opening Remarks

9:40 - 10:00 am Regulatory History and Scope of Coverage

10:00 – 10:30 am Test Procedure and Energy Conservation Standard Overview

10:30 - 10:45 am Break

ANOPR ANALYSIS

10:45 - 11:30 am Market and Technology Assessment and Screening Analysis

11:30 - 12:00 am Engineering Analysis and Product Price Determination

12:00 am - 1:00 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

1:00 – 1:15 pm Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis1:15 - 2:00 pm Energy Use and End-Use Load Characterization, Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis

2:00 - 2:30 pm Shipments Analysis, National Impact Analysis

NOPR ANALYSIS

Life-Cycle Cost Subgroup Analysis

2:30 – 2:45 pm Break

2:45 - 3:15 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis

3:15 - 3:45 pm Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis

FINAL RULE

3:45 - 4:30 pm Other Issues and Comments; Closing Remarks

4:30 pm Adjourn
#### Walter MACK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 22515.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 24, 1965.

Walter Mack, pro se.

Edward L. Shaheen, U. S. Atty., Shreveport, La., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON* and SMITH,** Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Judge of the D. C. Circuit, sitting by designation.

**

 Of the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant sought relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 from a mail fraud conviction. The district court denied relief. Merrill v. United States, 5th Cir. 1964, 338 F.2d 763, requires a reversal. The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to vacate and set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence, and to dismiss the indictment.

Reversed and remanded.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Isaac SINGLETON, Appellant.

WD 79741

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: April 24, 2018

Robert L. Reinhardt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, St. Joseph, MO, Attorney for Respondent.

Samuel Buffaloe, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

Michael Singleton appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of class B misdemeanor trespass in the first degree (§ 569.140), for which he was sentenced to *329six months in the county jail. Singleton raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court erred in admitting, at trial, a written statement he made to law enforcement that the trial court previously ruled inadmissible, at a suppression hearing, due to a *Miranda* violation. Because Singleton fails to demonstrate either error or prejudice, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 
19, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), 
(7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at 
the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
March 19, 2009 will be:

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    March 12, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-5791 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
FILE COPY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 14-0792

MICHAEL KENNEDY v. THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### § UN COURT OFAPPEALS 

# |lW j P-^^-P-f^U^sonCounty, § § § 

### CATHY S. LUSK 12th District.

December 5, 2014 

### Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied. January 30, 2015 Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above 

### numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

•••••••*•* I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk ofthe Supreme Court ofTexas, do hereby certify that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of 

### Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear ofrecord in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. » WITNESS my hand and seal ofthe Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this 

### the 2nd day ofFebruary, 2015. Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. Alan Joseph GIBSON

No. COA18-448

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 26, 2019

DISMISSED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

CORNWALL MOUNTAIN INVESTMENTS, 

L.P., AND RANGE RESOURCES -

APPALACHIA, LLC

v.

THOMAS E. PROCTOR HEIRS TRUST, 

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, PENNLYCO, LTD., 

VIRGINIA ENERGY CONSULTANTS, 

LLC, ATLANTIC HYDROCARBON, LLC, 

CHIEF EXPLORATION AND 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC, QUEST EASTERN 

RESOURCE, LLC, EXCO HOLDING (PA), 

INC., MARGARET O.F. PROCTOR 

TRUST 

PETITION OF: MARGARET O.F.

PROCTOR TRUST

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 270 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY 

PRODUCTION COMPANY
First amendment to 2008 Plan



 Exhibit 10.19 
 First Amendment to 
 Stericycle, Inc. 2008 Incentive
Stock Plan 
 The Stericycle, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is amended as follows pursuant to the
authority of the Board of Directors of Stericycle, Inc. under Paragraph 8.3 of the Plan: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment of Section 4.5 

 Section 4.5 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
 4.5 Individual Limit on
Awards 
 In any calendar year, the maximum number of shares for which Awards may be granted to any Eligible
Person shall not exceed 250,000 shares in the case of Options and SARS and 100,000 shares in the case of Restricted Stock and RSU Awards, in each case taking into account all similar types of grants and awards under other stock option and equity
compensation plans of the Company (other than the Company’s bonus conversion program and the Company’s employee stock purchase plan). These maximums shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Paragraph 4.6. 
  

	 	2.	Effective Date 

 This
Amendment shall be effective as of February 10, 2010.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

I, Eric L. Eishen, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Sturgis Bancorp, Inc.

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
(the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and

6.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|                     |  |                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Date August 13, 2003 |  | /s/ Eric L. Eishen                                
|                     |  |                                                   
|                     |  | Eric L. Eishen, President, Chief Executive Officer
Pamela Jane KRUGER, Respondent, v. Marc J. HEALEY, Appellant.

WD 79938

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: May 9, 2018

George L. Stafford, Slater, MO, Attorney for Respondent.

Marc J. Healey, Marshall, MO, Appellant, pro se.

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam

Marc Healey appeals a judgment entered in favor of Pamela Kruger on her *932action to eject Healey from property he previously owned that was purchased by Kruger at a delinquent tax sale. Healey raises five points on appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, the trial court's denial of his requests for a jury trial and to remove the case from the trial docket, the trial court's alleged bias against Healey, and the validity of the sale. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Gary L. Dreher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Gary L. DreherGary L. DreherChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2005
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeff Kinsella, Chief Financial Officer of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2006

 

/s/ Jeff Kinsella                                                

Jeff Kinsella

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
[consent002.gif]

KPMGLLP

Chartered Accountants

Telephone

(403) 691-8000

2700-205 5 Avenue SW

Fax

(403) 691-8008

Calgary AB  T2P 4B9

Internet

www.kpmg.ca





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







The Board of Directors

QSound Labs, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-117165 and 333-133714) and on Form F-3 (333-133290) of QSound Labs, Inc. of our report dated March 5, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of QSound Labs, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2007, annual report on Form 20-F of QSound Labs, Inc.





[consent003.jpg]



Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada

March 27, 2008



KPMG LLP, a Canadian owned limited liability partnership, is the Canadian 
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss association
Exhibit 32.2




            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                   THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hua Meng, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Hua Meng
-----------------------
Hua Meng
Chief Financial Officer

November 21, 2005
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5231 

To limit Federal court jurisdiction over certain suits pertaining to the application of a price threshold in determining the volume for which suspension 

of royalties applies to certain offshore oil and gas leases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. 

SOUDER, Mr. CALVERT, Mrs. BONO, and Mr. KELLER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To limit Federal court jurisdiction over certain suits pertaining to the application of a price threshold in determining the volume for which suspension of royalties applies to certain offshore oil and gas leases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deep Water Royalty 

5 Jurisdiction Act’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5231 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION 

2 OVER QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO ROYAL3 TIES UNDER CERTAIN OFFSHORE OIL AND 

4 GAS LEASES. 

5 (a) LIMITATION ON CERTAIN JURISDICTION.—In any 

6 case brought by any person other than a department, 

7 agency, or instrumentality of the United States, no court 

8 created by Act of Congress shall have any jurisdiction, and 

9 the Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction, to 

10 hear or decide any question pertaining to— 

11 (1) the application of a price threshold in deter12 mining the volume for which suspension of royalties 

13 applies under section 8(a)(1)(H) of the Outer Conti14 nental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(a)(1)(H)) 

15 and section 304 of Public Law 104–58 (43 U.S.C. 

16 1337 note) with respect to leases awarded in the 5- 

17 year period beginning on November 28, 1995; or 

18 (2) the interpretation of, or the validity under 

19 the Constitution of, this section. 

20 (b) CERTAIN DEFENSES NOT AVAILABLE.—In any 

21 case brought by a department, agency, or instrumentality 

22 of the United States against any person to recover royal23 ties under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, no legal 

24 or equitable defense shall be available to the defendant reVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:11 Apr 30, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5231.IH H5231

cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5231 IH 

1 garding the matters referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) 

2 of subsection (a). 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Balqon Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:




1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:   April 15, 2011

By:
/s/ BALWINDER SAMRABalwinder Samra

President and Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)




Dated:   April 15, 2011

By:
/s/ ROBERT J. MIRANDARobert J. Miranda

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.