alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23


              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



     We  have  issued  our  report  dated  July  26,  2002,   accompanying   the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Vasomedical,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May
31, 2002. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in
the Registration  Statements of Vasomedical,  Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-3
(File No.  333-34044,  effective April 12, 2000, File No.  333-60341,  effective
December 28, 1998, File No.  333-33319,  effective August 21, 1997, and File No.
33-62329,  effective  September 18, 1995) and on Forms S-8 (File No.  333-86152,
effective April 12, 2002, File No. 333-42692, effective August 1, 2000, File No.
333- 85457, effective August 18, 1999, File No. 333-85455,  effective August 18,
1999,  File No.  333-60471,  effective  August  3,  1998,  File  No.  333-11579,
effective  September 6, 1996, File No. 333-11581,  effective  September 6, 1996,
and File No. 333-11583, effective September 6, 1996).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
July 26, 2002

<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7330

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (1:93-cr-00262-1)

Submitted: July 14, 2010 Decided: August 5, 2010

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd George Maxwell seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying his motions in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2010) proceedings to amend his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) 

motion, and for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong.

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Maxwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

further deny Maxwell’s motion to dismiss his original indictment 

and his “Nunc Pro Tunc Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(2) Supplemental 
3

Motion for Recall of Mandate to Amend his Rule 33 Motion and 

Informal Brief.” We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Third Amendment to The Progressive Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 4.4 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN 
 WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”),
is currently in effect; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors believes that it is desirable to further amend the Plan;

 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Section 8(d) of the Plan, entitled “Buyout Provisions,” is hereby deleted in its entirety. 


 

	 	2.	Section 9(b)(vi) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 


(vi) Unless varied by the Committee, Stock Appreciation Rights shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified for
Stock Options in Sections 8(b)(vi) and (vii). 
  

	 	3.	Except as expressly modified hereby, the terms of the Plan shall be unchanged.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James C. Day, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



November 13, 2002                    /s/  JAMES C. DAY
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     James C. Day
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                     of Noble Corporation
Second Amendment to the Executive Retirement Plan of The Dun & Bradstreet Corp.



 Exhibit 10.28 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

 OF 
 THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION 
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)

 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to the Executive Retirement Plan of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (As Amended
and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) (the “Plan”) is effective as of January 1, 2010 (the “Effective Date”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (the
“Corporation”) sponsors the Plan and the Corporation has delegated authority to the Compensation & Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Committee”) to amend the Plan; and

 WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to amend the Plan as set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the Plan be, and it hereby is, amended to restrict participation in the Plan so that the
only individuals who may become Participants on or after the Effective Date are employees who are designated as “officers” of the Corporation for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and who
report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, as follows: 
 I. 
 Section 1.25 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing it in its entirety with the following: 
 “1.25 ‘Participant’ means an employee of the Corporation or an Affiliate who became a participant in the Plan pursuant to
Section 2.1 before January 1, 2010, or who becomes a participant in the Plan pursuant to Section 2.2 on or after such date, and who has not been removed pursuant to Section 2.3.” 
 II. 
 Section 2.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the phrase “Prior to January 1, 2010,” to be beginning of the first sentence thereof and by deleting the phrase “are eligible for participation in the Plan”
from that sentence and replacing it with the phrase “were eligible for participation in the Plan.” 







 III. 
 Existing Section 2.2 is hereby renumbered as Section 2.3 and the following new Section 2.2 is hereby added to the Plan: 
 “2.2 On and after January 1, 2010, only employees of the Corporation who (a) are designated as ‘officers’ of the
Corporation for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (b) report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation are eligible for participation in the Plan as of the effective date of the
designation or promotion that causes both aforementioned requirements to be satisfied.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Committee has caused this Second Amendment to be executed by the Plan Benefits Committee of the Corporation this 26th day of January, 2010. 
  

	
	 /s/ Patricia A. Clifford

	 Patricia A. Clifford

	
	 /s/ Kathy Guinnessey

	 Kathy Guinnessey

	
	 /s/ Chester Verceglio

	 Chester Verceglio

	
	 /s/ Louis Sapirman

	 Louis Sapirman
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. for the interim period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.

Dated:  August 14, 2006

 

/s/ Barry Lamperd                              

Barry Lamperd

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and will be retained by Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeff Kinsella, Chief Financial Officer of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: December 12, 2006

 

/s/ Jeff Kinsella                                                

Jeff Kinsella

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAL COASTAL
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         3
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              7
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       170
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of East Kansas Agri-Energy, L.L.C.(the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, WilliamR. Pracht, Principle Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jill A.Zimmerman, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | EAST  KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, L.L.C.                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                    |
|   |                                                    |
| Date:  | November 14, 2003                                       |   | /s/ William R. Pracht |
|   |                                                    |   | William  R. Pracht |
|   |                                                    |   | President  (Principle Executive Officer) |
|   |                                                    |   |   |
|   |                                                    |   |   |
| Date:  | November 14, 2003                                       |   | /s/ Jill A. Zimmerman |
|   | Jill A. Zimmerman                                       |
|   | Treasurer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
Kurt D. USRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105592

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: February 13, 2018

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Kurt Usry appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Bancroft Uranium Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, David Naylor, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that:

|1. | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                         
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.
|  

Date: November 14, 2008

| | By: | /s/David Naylor                           
| | --- | ------------------------------------------
| |     | David Naylor                              
| |     | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



1

---
IN the INTEREST OF: A.W.:

Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.J.W., IV (Father), Appellant.

WD 80834

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

FILED: February 20, 2018

Daniel C. Berezoski, Michael T. Raupp, Sierra J. Faler, Kansas City, for appellant.

Michael A. Herrin, Lori A. Fluegel, Kansas City for respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam

C.J.W. appeals from the circuit court's judgment terminating his parental rights to his daughter, A.W. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the grounds for termination and the best interest findings. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have *411provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5484 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5484

   To allow border States to use a portion of certain Department of 
 Homeland Security grants to build physical barriers to deter illegal 
                               crossings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mr. McHenry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow border States to use a portion of certain Department of 
 Homeland Security grants to build physical barriers to deter illegal 
                               crossings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Good Fences Make Good Neighbors Act 
of 2006''.

SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS FOR BUILDING 
              BARRIER AT BORDER PERMITTED.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 1014 of the USA PATRIOT 
Act (42 U.S.C. 3714(b)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Use of Grant Amounts.--
            ``(1) In general.--Grants under this section may be used to 
        purchase needed equipment and to provide training and technical 
        assistance to State and local first responders. In addition, 
        grants under this section may be used to construct, develop, 
        expand, modify, operate, or improve facilities to provide 
        training or assistance to State and local first responders.
            ``(2) Additional use for border state.--
                    ``(A) In general.--A border State may use up to 75 
                percent of the minimum amount allocated to the State 
                under this section to build a physical barrier near the 
                United States border to deter illegal crossings, and 
                for costs incidental thereto.
                    ``(B) Border state defined.--In this paragraph, the 
                term `border State' means--
                            ``(i) a State that shares a border with 
                        Canada or Mexico; or
                            ``(ii) a political subdivision of such a 
                        State.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
grants made for fiscal years beginning after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```