alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark A. Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



November 9, 2004                               /s/ MARK A. JACKSON
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Mark A. Jackson
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               of Noble Corporation
#### James A. KEY, Appellant, v. William C. HOLMAN, Warden, Kilby Prison, Alabama, Appellee.

No. 21805.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 4, 1965.

James A. Key, pro se.

Richmond Flowers, Atty. Gen., Owen Bridges, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON* and SMITH** Circuit ..Judges.

*

 Senior Circuit Judge of the D. C. Circuit, sitting by designation.

**

 Of the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The trial court denied appellant’s petition for habeas corpus on the ground that he had failed to exhaust available State remedies. It appearing that appellant did not appeal from the denials of collateral relief in the State court, it is apparent that he did not exhaust his State remedies. Such denials may be appealed in Alabama ex parte Wilson, 275 Ala. 439, 155 So.2d 611. Also, the Alabama law provides for free transcripts to indigent prisoners appealing from a denial of coram nobis. Alabama Laws, Act. No. 525, S.351 (Sept. 16, 1963).

%

The trial court’s judgment was correct. It is affirmed.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

l0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

138300

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138300 COA: 280730 St. Clair CC: 07-000427-FH MARK ANDRE RAY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We have issued our report dated July 29, 2005 accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Vasomedical,
Inc. and  Subsidiaries  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006.  We
hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  of  said  report  in the
Registration Statements of Vasomedical, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (File
No. 333-127752,  effective August 22, 2005, File No. 333-34044,  effective April
12, 2000, File No. 333-60341,  effective  December 28, 1998, File No. 333-33319,
effective August 21, 1997, and File No. 33-62329,  effective September 18, 1995)
and on Forms  S-8 (File  No.  333-86152,  effective  April  12,  2002,  File No.
333-42692,  effective August 1, 2000, File No.  333-85457,  effective August 18,
1999,  File No.  333-85455,  effective  August  18,  1999,  File No.  333-60471,
effective August 3, 1998, File No. 333-11579,  effective September 6, 1996, File
No. 333-11581,  effective  September 6, 1996, and File No. 333-11583,  effective
September 6, 1996).


/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP


Melville, New York
August 24, 2006
ex10_12.htm


    
      

    

    
      Exhibit
10.12

      


      List
of Executive Officers Who Participate in

      


      Symyx
Technologies, Inc. Executive Change in Control and Severance Benefit
Plan

      


      The
following executive officers participate in Symyx Technologies, Inc. Executive
Change in Control and Severance Benefit Plan:

      


      Isy
Goldwasser

      


      Rex S.
Jackson

      


      Trevor
Heritage

      


      Charles
Haley

      


      Richard
J. Rosenthal
1

From: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE) [SEIDELT@michigan.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 8:55 AM

To: Adams, Lucy H.

Attachments: lacks barden 8-21-08.pdf; lacks barden 2-1-11.pdf
exv10w32







	 	 	 	 	 



EXHIBIT 10.32




UNIT AWARD CERTIFICATE

Cash America Net Holdings, LLC — 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan




	 	 	 
	Award Certificate for: TIMOTHY HO

	 	Grant Date: August 1, 2007





Grant of Award. Cash America Net Holdings, LLC (“CashNet”) has granted to you, as one of its key
employees, an Award under the CashNet 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). This Award will
give you the opportunity to participate in the growth and success of CashNet, and in that way is
intended to motivate you to contribute to that growth and success.



Controlling Terms. The terms of your Award are controlled by the terms of the Plan document and
any amendments that may be made to it, regardless of anything in this Unit Award Certificate [this
“Certificate"] or any other document to the contrary. (A copy of the Plan and a related Summary of
Terms of the Plan, each as in effect as of the date of this Certificate, has been delivered to you
along with this Certificate).



Award Specifics. The number of Units included in, and the other specifics of, your Award are as
follows:




	 	 	 
	Number of Units
	 	10,002

	Grant Date
	 	August 1, 2007

	Grant Value Determined as of:
	 	June 30, 2007

	 	 	3,334 Units Vest on September 1, 2008


	Vesting Schedule*
	 	3,334 Units Vest on August 1, 2009


	 	 	3,334 Units Vest on August 1, 2010

	Payment Value Determined as of:
	 	June 30, 2010*

	Payment Date

(Special rules may apply upon a

Change in Control)
	 	September 30, 2010









 




			
	*	 	Subject to remaining continuously and actively employed
and not being terminated for Cause. Special rules apply
upon a Change in Control.




Payment Amount. The amount you will receive as soon as practicable after your Payment Date is
generally determined under the following formula:




	 	 	 	 	 
	[Increase in Value x .01]

	 	x
	 	Number of Vested Units
	100,000               
	 	 	 	 





The formula, manner and timing of determining the Increase in Value are set forth in the Plan
(which is the controlling document) and in the Summary of Terms of the Plan.



Deferral Election. You may, but are not required to, elect to defer the Payment Date of your Award
by completing a Deferral Election Form (a copy of which has been delivered to you with this
Certificate). To be effective, you must complete, sign and return the Deferral Election Form to
CashNet within 25 days after your Grant Date.



Acknowledgement. I hereby acknowledge that I have received this Certificate and a copy of the Plan
and agree to the terms of the Plan. I understand that, for my Award to be effective, I must return
a signed copy of this Certificate to CashNet, at the address below, by August 31, 2007.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	9/6/07

	 	 
	 	Signature:
	 	/s/ Timothy Ho
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date Signed	 	 	 	Printed Name: TIMOTHY HO






Retain One Original Signed Counterpart of this Certificate for your files and Deliver One Original
Signed Counterpart of this Certificate to: Cash America Net Holdings, LLC, Attention: General
Counsel, 1600 W. 7th Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of AMDL, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary L. Dreher, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 /s/ Gary L. Dreher  Gary L. Dreher
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2


                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her
knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements and Exchange
                  Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company



                                       Date: August 14, 2006


                                       /s/ JOANNE ROBERTS
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       JoAnne Roberts
                                       Senior Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer


                                       35
JJ'S BAR AND GRILL, INC., d/b/a JJ's Restaurant, et al., Appellants, v. USIC LOCATING SERVICES, LLC, Respondent.

WD 81381

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: August 28, 2018

Thomas H. Davis, Steven G. Emerson, and Courtney J. Harrison, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Appellants.

David B. Helms and Benjamin D. Mooneyham, St. Louis, MO, and Traci L. Martinez, Columbus, OH, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

*915JJ's Bar and Grill, Inc., d/b/a JJ's Restaurant and JJ's Building, LLC, appeals from the judgment entered against it by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, awarding USIC Locating Services, LLC court costs. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of North Carolina v. Orlando COOPER

No. 90P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 4, 2019

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Cooper, Orlando

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Sonya M. Calloway-Durham, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, For the State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of March 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of September 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 19th of March 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of September 2019."
NANNY'S KORNER DAY CARE CENTER, INC. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND EARLY EDUCATION

No. 108P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Ralph T. Bryant, Jr., Attorney at Law, Greenville, For Nanny's Korner Day Care Center, Inc.

Alexandra Gruber, Assistant Attorney General, For NC Department of Health & Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 26th of March 2019 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of March 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Ervin and Davis, J. recused
Order entered May 11, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01118-CV

BRIGETTA D’OLIVIO, Appellant

V.

HILARY THOMPSON HUTSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002-02704-2020

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 28, 2021 letter regarding the clerk’s 

record. We construe the letter as a motion to correct the clerk’s record. Appellant 

states in her motion that she has performed a “cursory review” of the clerk’s record 

and is still in the process of reviewing it. As best we can discern, appellant 

complains that the clerk’s record is missing the following three documents: (1) 

order signed on December 21, 2020; (2) amended judgment signed on December 
31, 2020

1

; and (2) order signed on January 1, 2020.

2

 We GRANT the motion to 

the extent that we ORDER Collin County Clerk Stacey Kemp to file, by May 21, 

2021, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the three requested documents. If 

any of the documents do not exist or cannot be located, Ms. Kemp shall provide 

written verification of such fact.

Should appellant have a further complaint about the clerk’s record, she shall 

file a motion specifically identifying any omission or inaccuracy.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Kemp and all parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE 

1 The clerk’s record contains the trial court’s Final Judgment and Order on Forcible Entry and Detainer 

signed on December 31, 2020. It also contains appellee’s Corrected Proposed Final Judgment and Order 

filed on December 18, 2020 with the corrected proposed order attached. The signed judgment in the 

clerk’s record includes the corrections requested in the corrected proposed final judgment.

2 We note the Case Summary in the clerk’s record includes a “Judge’s Docket Entry” for this date stating: 

“Defendant’s Motion to Clarify Oral Ruling, Reduce Amount of Supersedeas Bond and Reduce Oral 

Ruling to Written Order and Motion to Stay Enforcement of Oral Ruling Pending Consideration of 

Emergency Motion is hereby DENIED IN ALL PARTS.”
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 0**  **9 -**  **7330**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,

v.
L LOYD GEORGE MAXWELL , Defendant

– Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Albert V. B r yan, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1 : 93

- c r - 0 0 262

- 1 )

Submitted : July 1 4 , 2010 Decided: August 5 , 2010

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismiss e d by un published per curiam opinion

. Lloyd George Maxwell , Appellant Pro Se
. James L. Trump , A ssistant United States Attorney , Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lloyd George Maxwell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motions in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) proceedings to amend his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion , and for reconsideration. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or j udge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court deni es relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court ’ s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Mille r - El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Maxwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We further deny Ma xwell’s motion to dismiss his original indictment and his “Nunc Pro Tunc Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(2) Supplemental3 Motion for Recall of Mandate to Amend his Rule 33 Motion and Informal Brief

. ” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal content ions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Jeff Kinsella, Chief Financial Officer of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. for the interim period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.

Dated:  December 12, 2006

 

/s/ Jeff Kinsella                                  

Jeff Kinsella

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and 

Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and will be retained by Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.16







LOCK-UP AGREEMENT







This AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as of the 7th day of March, 2011, by Albert Aimers (the "Holder"), a stockholder of Clicker, Inc. (the "Company").







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which consideration are hereby acknowledged, Holder agrees as follows:







1.  Share Restriction.  Holder hereby agrees that from the date hereof until the date which is one year from the date hereof (the “Restriction Date”), Holder (including all direct affiliates of Holder) will not sell, pledge, transfer, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of any capital stock of the Company, any rights to acquire capital stock of the Company or any capital stock which Holder has a right to acquire, whether such capital stock is registered in the name of the Holder or otherwise (“Holder’s Shares”), other than with the prior written consent of the Company.  Holder further agrees that the Company is authorized to place "stop orders" on its books to prevent any transfer of shares of capital stock or other securities by Holder in violation of this Agreement.







During the Restriction Period, Holder further agrees not vote or grant a proxy with respect to any of the Holder’s Shares, other than with the prior written consent of the Company.







2.           Reliance by the Company and Other Holders.  Holder acknowledges that the Company is relying upon the agreements of Holder contained herein, and that the failure of Holder to perform the agreements contained herein could have a detrimental effect upon the Company.  Accordingly, Holder understands and agrees that Holder's agreements herein are irrevocable.







3.           Miscellaneous.







a.           At any time, and from time to time, after the signing of this Agreement Holder will execute such additional instruments and take such action as may be reasonably requested by the Company to carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.







b.           This Agreement shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada, except to the extent that the securities laws of the state in which Holder resides and federal securities laws may apply.







c.           This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Holder with respect to the subject matter hereof.







d.           This Agreement shall be binding upon Holder, its legal representatives, successors and assigns.


 


 


 


 


 



******************************




 




  





1











  






 


 












 


 


 


 


             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Holder has executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.




	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
 

	 
/s/ ALBERT AIMERS

	 
	 	 	Albert Aimers	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 




















 




 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2015 

# Order

September 2 3 , 2015

151655 ( 34 )

REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS

, INC

. , Plaintiff s

- Appell ee

,

v

ESTATE OF OSCAR L. BATCHELOR,

TERRENCE CRAWFORD, YVETTE

CRAWFORD, and all other occupants

, Defendant s

- Appell ants

. SC: 151655

COA: 322927

Wayne CC: 13

- 001662

- AV

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Estate of Oscar L. Batchelor to

substitute for defendant

- appellant Oscar L. Batchelor, deceased, pursuant to MCR

2.202(A)(1) is GRANTED.