alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State of West Virginia *v.*Lloyd B. Campbell *et al.*

(No. 7838)

Submitted May 15, 1934.

Decided June 5, 1934.

*Salisbury & Lopinsky,*for plaintiff in error.

*Homer A. Holt,.*Attorney General, and *Kenneth E. Hines,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Maxwell, Judge:

Lloyd B. Campbell, Earl Saunders and Edsil Strickland, joint-indictees, are under conviction and sentence for arson in Kanawha County. The property burned was the dwelling of Albert and Edgar Tinsley. Writ of error was awarded to Campbell and refused to the other defendants.

*199The defendants and the Tinsleys were neighbors living on Wills Creek in said county. The Tinsley dwelling burned about one o’clock in the morning of June 20, 1930. Some days after the fire, the defendants were arrested but were discharged by a magistrate upon a preliminary hearing. About three years later, they were indicted and arrested again. Saunders and Strickland were convicted on admissions of guilt made by them, though, at the trial, they undertook to deny 'the same and to prove an alibi. No admission of Campbell was proved. Certain statements of Saunders and Strickland implicated Campbell but the trial court excluded therefrom all references to Campbell. This, of course, was proper. “A confession or admission of an accomplice in a felony, made after the crime has been committed, and not a part of the *res*gestae, and not made in the presence of the accused on trial, is not evidence against the accused.” *State*v. *Spurr,*100 W. Va. 121, 130 S. E. 81.

The sum of the evidence against Campbell is. this: Admitted ill-feeling between him and the Tinsleys for many years; an implied threat by him about six months before the fire that if bullets would not put the Tinsleys out of their home, fire would (Campbell claimed an interest in the property) ; a threat two or three days before the fire that if the Tinsleys cut and removed from the property certain timber for posts he would “send them to hell alive”; a statement by Campbell’s wife, in his presence, soon after the preliminary hearing, that they would have to get Strickland away or he would get Campbell into trouble in connection with the Tinsley fire. Saunders and Strickland were employed by Campbell in farming and rig-building, and were living in his home.

The whole setting creates grave suspicion of Campbell’s guilt, but conviction cannot be based on suspicion. The evidence failed to prove his guilt in accordance with settled and familiar rules of the administration of criminal law. “Proof of facts and circumstances which arouse strong suspicion of guilt or guilty knowledge of a crime on the part of the accused, but which do not prove beyond a reasonable doubt his criminal agency in *200its commission, will not sustain a verdict of guilty.” *State*v. *Dudley,*96 W. Va. 481, 123 S. E. 241, 242.

It follows that the judgment must be reversed, the verdict set aside and the case remanded for further proceedings in the trial court.

*Reversed and remanded.*
**Exhibit 1.2**

Approved by the Annual GeneralMeeting of Shareholders ofMobile TeleSystems Open Joint Stock Companydated June 23, 2006

## **AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONSTO THE CHARTERof Mobile TeleSystems Open Joint Stock Company**

Moscow                                                                                                                                                                               June 23,2006

To add the following paragraph to Item 1.1. of theCharter:

“The Company is the full legal successor in respect ofall rights and obligations of the Open Joint Stock Company ReCom (registered onFebruary 26, 1998 by the Registration Chamber of the city of Orel under No.1244-Cand entered into the consolidated state register of legal entities on August 7,2002 by Tax Inspectorate of the Ministry of Taxes and Levies of the RussianFederation for the Sovetski District of the city of Orel under Main StateRegistration Number: 1025700824544), reorganized in the form of merger intoMobile TeleSystems Open Joint Stock Company.

The Company is the full legal successor in respect ofall rights and obligations of the Closed Joint Stock Company Telesot-Alania(entered into the consolidated state register of legal entities on December 30,2002 by Tax Inspectorate of the Ministry of Taxes and Levies of the RussianFederation for the North-West municipal district of the city of Vladikavkaz ofthe Republic of Northen Ossetia-Alania under Main State Registration Number:1021500773546), reorganized in the form of merger into Mobile TeleSystems OpenJoint Stock Company”.

1

----
ex10-12.htm


    Exhibit
10.12

    


    Summary
of Director Compensation

    


    
      	
              Description

            	
              Amount*

            
	
               

              Annual
      Retainer

               

            	
               

              $20,000

            
	
              Fee
      per meeting for attendance (in person or telephonically) at any of the
      five (5) regularly scheduled Board meetings

               

            	
              $3,000

            
	
              Annual
      Restricted Stock Award

               

            	
              $100,000

            
	
              Lead
      Independent Director

               

            	
              $
      12,500

            
	
              Annual
      Audit Committee Chair Fee

               

            	
              $10,000

            
	
              Annual
      Compensation Committee Chair Fee

               

            	
              $5,000

            
	
              Annual
      Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair Fee

               

            	
              $2,500

            
	
              Fee
      per meeting for attendance (in person or telephonically) at any meeting of
      the Board called to address a significant issue(s) outside of the normal
      course of business

               

            	
              $2,500
      per meeting

            
	
              Fee
      per meeting for attendance (in person or telephonically) at any committee
      meeting called to address a significant issue(s) outside of the normal
      course of business

            	
              $1,250
      per meeting

            


    

    _______________

    *  The
compensation referred to in the above table is only available to independent
directors.
IN the INTEREST OF: M.K.G. and B.N.H., Plaintiffs,

Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. A.S. (Mother); Appellant,

M.G. (Father); Respondent,

D.H. (Father), Respondent.

WD 80708

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: March 20, 2018

Henry Service, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Claire Terrebonne, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Plaintiffs.

Ashley Irwin, Grain Valley, MO, Counsel for Respondent, D.H.

Samuel Barnett, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent, M.G.

Edward Moore, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent, Juvenile Officer.

Bree Sturner, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent, Juvenile Officer.

Before Division Two: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Alok Ahuja, and Anthony Rex Gabbert, JJ.

**ORDER**

Per Curiam:

*492A.S. appeals the circuit court's judgment terminating her parental rights to her two daughters, M.K.G. and B.N.H., pursuant to section 211.447, RSMo. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
AFS-09-411-E Oct 1 2010

Mr. James L. Jensen Vice President and Director of Operations Air Center Helicopters, Inc. 150 Aviation Way, Hangar 17N

Fort Worth, TX 76106

Dear Mr. Jensen:

This is in response to your letter dated July 7, 2009, petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Air Center Helicopters, Inc. (Air Center), for an exemption from § 135.145 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

After reviewing your request, the FAA finds th e exemption process is not the appropriate method by which to obtain relief to this regulation. Section 135.145(g) states the Administrator may authorize deviations from this section if the Administrator finds that special circumstances make full compliance with this section unnecessary. Therefore, you should seek a deviation through your cer tificate holding district office.

The FAA will take no further action on your petition and Docket No. FAA-2006-25223 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241, AS ADOPTED 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

I, J. Russell Porter, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the “Registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2007
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Granite Broadcasting Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), we, W. Don Cornwell and EllenMcClain, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuantsection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of ourknowledge:

 

(i)                   the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)                the information contained in the Form 10-K fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:  March29, 2004.

 
|   | /s/                      | W. DON CORNWELL |   |
|--------|--------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|   | W. Don  Cornwell         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | /s/                      | ELLEN McCLAIN   |   |
|   | Ellen  McClain           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
IN the INTEREST OF A.H.

No. ED 105290

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

FILED: February 20, 2018

George Edward Tillman, St. Charles, MO, for Appellant.

David Cole Winters, St. Charles, MO, for Respondent.

Michele Hammond, Hammond & Blacketer, LLC, St. Charles, MO, for Juvenile.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

*445J.H. appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights to A.H. on the grounds of failure to rectify conditions under Section 211.447.5(3), RSMo 2000. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5190]



[[Page 10621]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,348]


Small Parts Manufacturing, Portland, OR; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 23, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Small Parts Manufacturing, 
Portland, Oregon.
    The Department has determined that the petition is invalid. The 
petitioner is a worker and not a state agency representative as 
indicated on the petition. A petition filed by workers must be 
completed by three workers.
    Accordingly, this petition investigation is terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of February 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-5190 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN the INTEREST OF: K.M.J., C.D.J. and T.K.E., Plaintiffs.

F.S. and D.S., Respondents,

Juvenile Officer, Respondent,

K.L., Defendant, v. J.J., Appellant,

K.L., Appellant.

WD 80987 CONS. WD 81066

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: March 20, 2018

Kelley Gilmore, Esq., Matthew Branson, Esq. and Stephanie McCabe, for Appellants

Robert Arnold, III, for Plaintiffs

Mitchell Widener, Esq. and Laurie Snell, Esq., for Respondents

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

J.J. appeals the judgment of Jackson County Circuit Court terminating his parental rights. K.L. appeals the judgment denying her petition for adoption of the minor children and granting F.S. and D.S.'s petition for adoption. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1




           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dahua Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yonglin Du,
President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Yonglin Du
------------------
Yonglin Du
President and CEO

November 21, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

      ( print page 11732)    
In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory  Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease  Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting. 

*Time and Date:*                         8 a.m.-5 p.m., April 6, 2009 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Sheraton Gateway Hotel Atlanta Airport, 1900 Sullivan Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30337.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of “The Incidence and Etiology of Influenza-Associated Pneumonia in Hospitalized Persons and Virologic Evaluation of the Modes of Influenza Virus Transmission Among Humans, FOA IP09-001 and IP09-003.”                     

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Gregory Anderson, M.S., M.P.H., Office of the Director, Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E-60, Atlanta, GA 30333,                         *Telephone:*                         (404) 498-2275.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: March 13, 2009. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 [FR Doc. E9-6047 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<Page>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of Allstate Life
Insurance Company of New York filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York.

March 18, 2009

                          /s/  FREDERICK F. CRIPE
                          -----------------------
                          Frederick F. Cripe
                          Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

                          /s/  JOHN C. PINTOZZI
                          ---------------------
                          John C. Pintozzi
                          Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Bay View Capital Corporation:

We have audited the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
stockholders' equity and cash flows of Bay View Capital Corporation and
subsidiaries (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 1997.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Bay View Capital
Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1997, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
January 26, 1998
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

     (a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
          March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  the  results  of
          operations of the Fund for such period.

A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED  TO THE FUND  AND WILL BE  RETAINED  BY THE FUND AND  FURNISHED  TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

Dated:  May 15, 2003



                                            /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                            ---------------------------
                                                Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                                Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-9857.

#### Joshua Mojica, aka Ramiro Josh Salazar, Petitioner v. United States.

559 U.S. 1101, 130 S. Ct. 2394,

176 L. Ed. 2d 784,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 3609.

April 26, 2010.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 273.