; RBLC Search Results I RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse I Clean Air Technology Cen... page I of 3

=&showAllRecords- No&cFID=6826586&CFToKEN =28045652&ìse ssipg¡i{ rÞöåR:Ü]gñ}ìf¿êSeåfffiÞf/êñ.ßd.6Ê2tr?f r\t*}æ

¡ Technology Transfer Network

clean Âir Technology center - RACT/BACT/LAER clearinghouse

You are here: EPA Home Air & Radiation TTNWeb - Technology Transfer Network Clean A¡r Technologv Center

RACT/BACT/LAER Clear¡nohouse RBLC Basic Search RBLC Advanced Search RBLC Search Results

RBLC Search Results

Your search has found 25 facilities and 56 processes that match your search criteria. You can view details for one

or m.ore facilities by clicking 

-or¡ 

the highlighted RBLC identifier orthe process description in the list below-To -

çreqte a report, select one of the standard output formats from the liit of repots at the bottom of this oaqe. Onlv facilities that are checked in the table below will be included in your reþorl ðlick on the cflect< Oox në"t-to'ãÅv ' 

'

facility to switch between checked and unchecked or use the "Check" or "Un-Check" all facilities Outtons átlfrä top of the llst to check or uncheck all records in the list.

Matching Facilities for Search Criteria:

Portion of Database: Draft Determinations And RBLC Permits issued during or after January, 1999

And process contains CEMENT

rene"kl f unçliecr<l ALL Facitlies

LON ESTAR INDUSTRIES INC

LONESTAR INDUSTRIES

MARYNEWAL CEMENT PLANT

AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES

SLOAN QUARRY

ENTAL CEMENT COMPANY,

L.C.

NTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY,

PROCESS

DESCRIPTION

90.006 CEMENT MANUFACTURING

90,012 AGGREGAI-E/CEMENT MIXING

90.O24 AGGREGATE/CEMENT PRODUCTS

BAGGING AND PACKING

90,028 PORTLAND CEMENT KILN

90.006 CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL KILN

90.028 CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM

90.028 CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM

90.028 POPRTLAND CEMENT

MANUFACTURING

90.028 BUCKET ELEVATOR FEED - CEMENT

SILO

90.028 AIRSLIDES & SILOS - CEMENT SILO

90.028 CEMENT KILN SYSTEM. #5

90,028 CEMENT BAGGING #1

NOïÊ: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBL

coRPoRATE/COMPANY & CODE

PERMIT NUMBER

82775

04/L0/2009

372

t2/tL/2006

072006-003

07/ru2006

R14-0028

04/2612006

PSD-FL-361

02/LO/2006

PSD-FL-358

(1 190041-00 1-AC)

02/07/2006

'1630-00025

08/20/2004

1 7-0 1-005

L2/7t/2003

vA-20232

06/73/2003

28,1101-PSD

04/t0/2003

TE

ttwv-0024

ul'FL-0282

ivl FL-0281

g MS-0071

ia IA-0070

GREENBRIER COTION, LLC

ERN GREENBRIER COERATION, LLC

RICAN CEMENT COMPANY,

CEMENT COMPANY

cEMENT COMPANY, LLC

R/CENTER HILL CEMENT

T

IM (US), INC,

GH CEMENT COMPANY

GH CEMENT COMPANY -

CITY PLANT

http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblclcfmhbcrtres.cfm?RequestTimeout:500&dateRange:D,F>&Ele... IIl24l200g
i RBLC Search Results I RACTiBACT/LAER Clearinghouse I Clean Air Technology Cen... Page 3 of 3

90.019 CEMENT MANUFACTURING,

SECONDARY CRUSHER '

90,028 CEMENT MANUFACTURING, BALL

MILL TRANSFER EQUIPM ENT

99.120 CEMENT MANUFACTURING. FLY ASH

vtlx-0279 NORTH TEXAS

NORTH TEXAS

PSD-TX-893

03/04/1999

f-ñn I un-cñeck ] ALL Facitities

Select a ReooÉ Format

Formatting y.our report may take a while, especially if your facility has a large number of processes and pollutants, The detail reports take the longest amount of time because they include the most information. please

be patient after you select "Create repoft" ,

f)S¡row All Records 8)Show Only Selected Records On This page

Free Form Repoft(Customizable Fields Selection,as Sorted in Results Table) .1,

90,028 CEMENT LOADOUT NO. 1 AND NO. 2

90.028 CEMENT SILO FEED BIN #S. 1. 2. 3,

4

Create

SILOS

90,028 CEMENT MFG.. FINISH MILL -**-\'\- TRAt\isFER. I\lo.3

CEMENT COMPANY OY gò\OZE 90ì028 CEMENT SILO NO.1

CEMENT COMPANY \ 

-

90.028 CEMENT SILO NO, 2

pgóze cH"tzur SIlo No. ¡

http:llcfpttb.epa.govhblc/cfm/rbcrtres.cfm?RequestTimeout:500&dateRange:D,F>&Ele... IIl24l200g
Please select the fields that vor¡ war¡t to displav in the report.

Facilities Pollutants Affected Boundaries

Process Type

ÞiÞrimary Fuel

Throughput

Throughput

í -jrirnlt (class 1 Area or

ofthe border ofthe

flBoundary Type (Class 1 or

ntl Border)

l-J Distatrce (kilometers)

X Class I Area State

RBLCID

Facility Name

n Facility County

Facility State

plFacilitr ZipCode

I lFacility Counhy

Facility Contact Name

f, Facility Contact Phone

Þ$acility Contact Email

l---lEPa Region

f-l Asencv Code

AgencyName

.E(Agen.y Contact

llAgency Phone

L-ì Ottt.t Agency Contact

lnfo

IPermitNumber

I sIc

I Facility Registry System

l---ì Application Accepted

Received Date

ftPermit Issuance Date

Xout. determination

I Dut" determination last

f,Facility Description

Kòtn., Permitting

f-l Facility-wide

n Emissions Increase Test Method

L_-ìcas Number

ft Control Method Code

Control Method Description

j

SEmission Limit 1

ffiEmissionLimit I Unit

þ{Emission Limit I Avg.

[JEmission Limit2

fiEmission Limit 2 Unit

{Emission Limit 2 Avg.

f l Stan¿ar¿ Emission Limit

n Standard E*ission Limit

E Standard Limit Avg.

fJ Case-by-Case Basis

f-l oth.r Applicable

Other Factors?

Estim ated Ef flr ciency (þ

E Compliance Verified

L-l Cost Effectiveness

! Incremental Cost

E Cost Verified By Agency

[---]lotl* Year Used In Cost

E Po llutants/Compliance

Format RBLC Report Page 1 of 1

hltp.,llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptFreeForm_Mid.cfm?RequestTimeout:5O0&CFID:. .. I112412009
Format RBLC Report

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: j.1-/25/2009

Page 1 of229

Control Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: LONESTAR INDUSTRIES MARYNEWAL CEMENT PLANT

RBLC ID:

*Corporate/Company

Name:

xFacility Name:

Facility State:

Facility ZIP Code:

Facility Contact Name:

Facility Contact Phone:

Facility Contact Email:

Agency Name:

Agency Contact:

Agency Phone:

Agency Email:

NAICS:

Permit Issuance Date:

Date determination last

updated:

Permit Type:

Facility Description:

Other Permitting

Information:

*TX-O543

LONESTAR INDUSTRIES INC

LONESTAR INDUSTRIES MAR\î{EV/AL CEMENT PLANT

TX

7953s

MR ROD SIMMONS

6108825020

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ)

RANDY HAMILTON

(srz)239-tsr2

RHAMILTO (E,TCEQ. S TATE. TX. U S

327310

0411012009 ACT

rU0612009

A: NEV//GREENFIELD FACILITY

LONE STAR/BUZZI PROPOSES A NEV/ DRY PROCESS PORTLAND

CEMENT KILN AND RELATED NEW MATERIAL PROCESSING

FACILITIES TO REPLACE THREE OLDER, LONG-DRY PROCESS

CEMENT KILNS AND MATERIAL PROCESSING FACILITIES AT

THEIR MAR\î{EAL PLANT. THE ANNUAL PRODUCTION CAPACITY

OF THE PROPOSED NEW KILN LINE IS 1.1 MILLION SHORT TONS

PER YEAR (STPY) OF CLINKER. THE THREE EXISTING KILNS, WITH

AN ANNUAL CAPACITY PRODUCTION OF 0.6 MILLION STPY OF

CLINKER V/ILL BE PERMANENTLY SHUT DOWN AFTER THE NEW

KILN HAS COMPLETED ITS STARTUP AND INITIAL SHAKEDOWN.

BECAUSE OF THE SHUTDOWN OF THE OLD KILNS, THERE V/ILL BE

CONTEMPORANEOUS REDUCTIONS. THE ONLY CONTAMINANT

WITH A SIGNIFICANT NET INCREASE AND THEREFORE SUBJECT

TO PSD PERMIT REVIEW IS PARTICULATE MATTER (PM),

INCLUDING PM WITH AN AVERAGE DIAMETER EQUAL TO OR

LESS THAN 10 MTCRONS (pM10). THE STATE PERMTT REVTEW

REQUIRES BACT, RESULTING IN SELECTIVE NON-CATALYTIC

REDUCTTON (SNCR) FOR NTTROGEN OXTDES O{OX) FROM THE

KILN. THE CALCIUM IN THE RAV/ MEAL WILL ABSORB MUCH OF

THE PYRITIC SULFUR IN THE LIMESTONE AND FUEL SULFUR,

MAINTAINING RELATIVELY LOW ANNUAL SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2)

EMISSIONS.

PSDTXl lOl

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report . Page 2 of229

Process Information : LONESTAR INDUSTRIES MARYNEV/AL CEMENT PLANT

*Process Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING

*Process Type: 90.006

Primary Fuel: COAL

Throughput: 155.00

Throughput Unit: SHORT T/D

Process Notes: THE PROPOSED NEW CEMENT KILN IS A SINGLE KILN

(APPLICATION BASED ON A POLYSIUS DESIGN) WITH A

PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF 155 SHORT TONS PER DAY AND 1.1

MILLION SHORT TONS OF CLINKER PER YEAR (90% ANNUAL

CAPACITY FACTOR). THE PROPOSED NEV/ KILN V/ILL BE A

MODERN, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER DESIGN CHARACTERIZED

BY HIGH THERMAL EFFICIENCY, COMPARED TO OLDER SYSTEMS

SUCH AS THE EXISTING LONG-DRY KILNS. IN ADDITION TO

REPLACEMENT OF THE THREE EXISTING KILNS, THE EXISTING

RAW MATEzuAL PREPARATION SYSTEMS WILL BE REPLACED, AS

\MLL THE FINISHING EQUIPMENT USED TO TRANSFORM THE

CLINKER INTO PORTLAND CEMENT. THE ONLY EXISTING

EQUIPMENT TO BE RETAINED CONSISTS OF: THE COAL RAILCAR

UNLOADING EQUIPMENT, COAL SCREEN, COAL STORAGE SILOS,

FINISHED CEMENT STORAGE SILOS, ONE TRUCK LOADOUT FOR

FINISHED CEMENT, AND MACHINES FOR BAGGING FINISHED

CEMENT. PROPOSED ABATEMENT FOR THE KILN EXHAUST

EMISSIONS INCLUDES A BAGHOUSE FOR CONTROL OF

PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) AND PARTICULATE MATTER BELOW

10 MrcRoNS (PM10), AND SELECTIVE NON-CATALYTTC

REDUCTTON (SNCR) FOR NTTROGEN OXTDES (NOX) CONTROL. THE

PROPOSED FUELS FOR THE NEW KILN ARE THE SAME AS

CURRENTLY AUTHORIZED FOR THE EXISTING KILNS: COAL,

PETROLEUM COKE, TIRES, NATURAL GAS, AND VARIOUS OTHER

ALTERNATIVE NON-HAZARDOUS FUELS.

Pollutant Information: LONESTAR INDUSTRIES MARYNEWAL CEMENT PLANT - CEMENT

MANUFACTURING

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method LOW-NOX MAIN KILN BURNER, LOW-NOX,PRECALCINER AND Description: SNCR. THE PROPOSED EMISSION LIMIT IS 1.95 LB NO)ITON

CLINKER PRODUCED, 3O-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE.

Emission Limit 1: 1.9500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB NO)IT CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit: ' Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air N

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName

Page 3 of229

Carbon Monoxide

THE PROPOSED EMISSION LIMIT OF 2.0 LB CO/TON CLINKER, 12-

MONTH ROLLING AVERAGE, IS BASED ON RAW MATERIAL

PROPERTIES AND CURRENT KILN SYSTEM DESIGN.

2.0000

LB CO/T CLINKER

1 2-MONTH ROLLING AVERAGE

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air N

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method THE PROPOSED EMISSION LIMIT OF 0.10 LB VOC/TON CLINKER IS Description: BASED ON RAW MATERIAL PROPERTIES AND CURRENT KILN

SYSTEM DESIGN.

Emission Limit 1: 0.1000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB VOC/T CLINKERKE

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air N

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

tPollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method THE MAIN KILN BAGHOUSE IS DESIGNED TO MEET AN EMISSION Description: LIMIT OF 0.007 GR/DSCF, FILTER CATCH.

Emission Limit 1: 0.0070

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

http://cfoub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air N

pollution technology ' considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 4 of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: tt/zS/ZOOg Control- Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, t.L.C.

RBLC ID: MO-0012 *Corporate/Company CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.

Name:

*Facility Name: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.

Facility State: MO

Facility ZIP Code: 63401

Facility ContactName: JERRY EPPERSON

Facility ContactPhone: 5132216262

Facility Contact Email:

Agency Name: MISSOURI DNR, AIR POLL CONTROL PROGRAM

Agency Contact: MS. KYRA MOORE

Agency Phone: (573) 526-3835

Agency Email: KYRA.MOORE@DNR.MO.GOV

NAICS: 2381 10

Permit Issuance Date: 0711112006 ACT

Date determinationlast 0411812008

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEV/ PROCESS TO EXISTING FACILITY

Facility Description: INSTALLATION OF A 3,300 TON OF CLINKER PER DAY PREHEATER

AND/OR PRECALCINER PORTLAND CEMENT KILN.

UNDERGROUND LIMESTONE MINE, AND ASSOCIATED

PROCESSES. REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING KILN (KP-01) AS PART

OF THIS PROJECT ACCOUNTS FOR NOX EMISSIONS DECREASING.

BASED ON NETTING ANALYSIS, NOX YIELDED A DECREASE IN

EMISSIONS OF 492.62 TONS PER YEAR.

Other Permitting

Information:

Facility-wide Emissions : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.

*Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 2168.6200 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 1629.5800 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 496.3100 (Tons/Year)

hfiB:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 1162.3500 (TonsiYear)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 725900 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Page 5 of229

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.

*Process Name: PORTLAND CEMENT KILN

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: INSTALL OF A 3,300 TON OF CLIKER PER DAY PREHEATER AND/OR

PRECALCINER PORTLAND CEMENT KILN.

Pollutant Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. - PORTLAND CEMENT

KILN

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSES HAVE BEEN SELECTED AS BACT FOR EACH POINT Description: SOURCE OF PM10 EMISSIONS THAT IS NEW OR MODIFIED

Emission Limit 1: 0.5160

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg. CLINK 3-HOUR AVERAGING TIME

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air Y

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

*Control Method Code: A

*ContToI Method INHERENT RAV/ MILL SCRUBBING IS CONSIDERED TO BE BACT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 1.9300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIT

Emission Limit I Avg. CLINK 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 265.3800

Emission Limit 2Unit: LBIT

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE

http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 6 of229

*Pollutant Name Volatile Organic Compôunds (VOC)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method THE NEW PH/PC KILN SYSTEM AND THE COAL MILL PREHEATER Description: WILL UTILIZE GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES FOR BACT.

Emission Limit 1: 0.1200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIT

Emission Limit 1 Avg. CLINK

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

. pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: A

*ContToI Method THE NEW PH/PC KILN SYSTEM AND THE COAL MILL PREHEATER Description: WILLUTILIZE GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES FOR BACT.

Emission Limit 1: 3.6000

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIT

Emission Limit 1 Avg. CLINK

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: aa/25/2009 control- Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information : WE S TERN GREENB RIER CO - GENERATI ON, LL C

RBLC ID: WV-0024 *Corporate/Cgmpany V/ESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION,LLC

Name:

*Facility Name: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION,LLC

http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report PageT of229

Facility State: WV

Facility ZIP Code: 25962

Facility Contact Name: BRIAN NEELY

Facility ContactPhone: 3044388000

Facility Contact Email: BNEELY@WVCOGEN.COM

Agency Name: WEST VIRGINIA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL COMM

Agency Contact: MR. JOE KESSLER

Agency Phone: (304)926-3727

Agency Email: jkessler@mail.dep.state.wv.us

NAICS: 221112

Permit Issuance Date: 0412612006 ACT

Date determination last 0911512006

updated:

Permit Type: ,{: NEWGREENFIELD FACILITY

Facility Description: NOMINAL 98 NET MEGAV/ATT WASTE COAL-FIRED STEAM

ELECTRIC CO-GENERATION FACILITY. BOILER IS CFB

TECHNOLOGY. FACILITY INCLUDES KILN TO PRODUCE

. CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL FROM ASH GENERATED IN BOILER.

Other Permitting CURRENTLY I-INDER APPEAL

Information:

Affected B oundarie s : WE S TERN GREENBRIER C O- GENERATION, LLC

*Limit (Class I Area or Dolly Sods

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class 1 CLASSl

or Intl Border):

Distance:

169.00

164.00

Class 1 Area State: WV

*Limit (Class I Area or James River Face

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class 1 CLASS1

or Intl Border):

Distance: 120.00

Class 1 Area State: VA

*Limit (Class I Area or Otter Creek

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class I CLASSl

or Intl Border):

Distance: 143.00

Class 1 Area State: WV

*Limit (Class I Area or Shenandoah NP

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class 1 CLASSl

or Intl Border):

Distance:

http:llcþub.epa,gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009
Format RBLC Report

Class 1 Area State: VA

Page 8 of229

Facility-wide Emissions : WESTERN GREENBzuER CO-GENERATION, LLC

*Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 926.0600 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Facilþ-wide Emissions 529.4300 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 153.7900 (TonsiYear)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 631.8400 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 28.5400 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : V/ESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC

*Process Name: CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED BOILER (CFB)

*Process Type: 11.110

Primary Fuel: WASTE COAL Throughput: 1070.00

Throughput Unit: mmbtu/h

PTOCess Notes: NOMINAL 1,070 MMBTU V/ASTE-COAL FIRED CFB. MAXIMUM

COAL THROUGHPUT AT WORST-CASE FUEL SCENARIO IS 157 TPH.

ANNUAL HEAT INPUT SHALL NOT EXCEED 8,908,920 MMBTU.

SULFUR AND ASH CONTENTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.47% AND

63 .7 lYo, RESPECTIVELY.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC - CIRCULATING

FLUIDIZED BED BOILER (CFB)

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COMBUSTION CONTROLS

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 

,

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 24-HOUR

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method SNCR

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit I Avg. 30-DAY

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Page 9 of229

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 0.0150

Unit: LB/MMBTU

Avg. 3O-DAY

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 30-DAY

Time/Condition:

'Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

http,,llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate mafrer, filterable < l0 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0300

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 30-DAY

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method LIME INJECTION AND FLASH DRYER ABSORBER (FDA)

Description:

Emission Limit

Page 10 of229

: 0.1400

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIMMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 3-HOUR

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.1400

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 24-HOUR

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfuric Acid (mist, vapors, etc)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method LIME INJECTION AND FLASH DRYER ABSORBER (FDA)

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0060

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LB'IT CLINKER, PER TEST METHOD

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg'.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 1l of229

Process Information : WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC

*Process Name: CEMEÀTITIOUS MATERIAT KILN

*Process Type: 90.006

Primary Fuel: COAL

Throughput: 13.00

Throughput Unit: mmbtu

' Process Notes: KILN USES FLYASH, ALUMINA, GYPSUM, AND LIMESTONE TO

PRODUCE CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL FOR RESALE. DOES NOT

UTILIZE STEAM FROM CFB. KILN WILL COMBUST

APPROXIMATELY 0.5 TPH OF COAL. KILN EXHAUST WILL BE

JOINED WITH CFB EXHAUST AND EMITTED FROM A COMMON

STACK.

Pollutant Information: V/ESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC - CEMENTITIOUS

MATERIAL KILN

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COMBUSTION CONTROLS

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 24-HOUR

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (I.{Ox)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method PERMITTEE WILL ATTEMPT TO CONTROL NOX IN KILN EXHAUST Description: BY VENTING THROUGH CFB SNCR. EFFECTIVENËSS, HOWEVER, IS

UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME

Emission Limit 1: 6.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIT

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LB,IT CLINKER, 30-DAY

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0650

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIT

Emission Limit I Avg. LBIT CLINKER, PER TEST METHOD

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1300

Emissiôn Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LB/T CLINKER, PER TEST METHOD

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit I Avg. LP,Æ CLINKER, PER TEST METHOD

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Page 12 of229

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill.istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method CONDITIONING TOWER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.6000

Emission Limit I Unit: LB,Æ

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LB.IT CLINKER, 3-HOUR

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfuric Acid (mist, vapors, etc) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method CONDITIONNG TOV/ER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0250

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LBIT CLINKER, PER TËST METHOD

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2tJnit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 13 of229

Process Information : WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC

*Process Name: COAL HANDLING

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 300.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 14 of229

Pollutant Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC - COAL HANDLING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTERS

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC

*Process Name: LIMESTONE HANDLING

*Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 100.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC - LIMESTONE

HANDLING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTERS

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http:i/cþub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Process Information : WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC

Page 15 of229

*Process Name: ASH HANDLING

*Process Type: 99.120

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 105.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC - ASH HANDLING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTERS

Des'cription:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC

*Process Name: PAVED HAULROADS

*Process Type: 99.140

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION,LLC - PAVED HAULROADS

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, fugitive

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method SHALL MAINTAIN PAVEMENT SHALL USE VACUUM SV/EEPER Description: AND WATER TRUCKS MAX SPEED 15 MPH

Emission Limit 1: 90.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % REDUCTION

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Conditiorr:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

http://cfpub.epa.govirblclReports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 16 of229

Process Information : WESTERN GREENBzuER CO-GENERATION, LLC

*Process Name: COOLING TOWER

*Process Type: 99.009

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 55000.00

Throughput Unit: gallm

Process Notes: MAXIMUM TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS : 6,300 PPM.

Pollutant Information: WESTERN GREENBRIER CO-GENERATION, LLC - COOLING TOWER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method DRIFT ELIMINATORS @ 0.0005% DRIFT RATE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.7900

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 3.4600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: a1/25/2009 Contro] Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY

RBLC ID: FL-0282 *Corporate/Company AMERICANCEMENTCOMPANY,LLC

Name:

*Facility Name: AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY

Facility State: FL

Facility ZIP Code:

Facility Contact Name:

Facility Contact Phone:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report PagelT of229

Facility.Contact Email:

Agency Name: FLOzuDA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTLA PROTECTION

Agency Contact: MS. TERESA HERON

Agency Phone: (850)921-9529

Agency Email: teresa.heron@dep.state.fl.us NAICS: 327310

Permit Issuance Date: 0211012006 ACT

Date determination last 0113112007

updated:

Permit Type: A: NEWGREENFIELD FACILITY

Facility Description: THE PROPOSED FACILITY V/ILL BE A NOMINAL 1,150,000 TONS

PER YEAR (TPY) DRY PROCESS PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT

INCORPORATING A DRY PROCESS KILN WITH A PREHEATER AND

CALCTNER (PH/C).

Other Permitting MAJOR EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE MAIN COMPONENTS Information: OF THE PLANT WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: . A MATERIALS

STORAGE BUILDING (MSB); . A PRIMARY CRUSHER AT THE

QUARRY AND BELT CONVEYORS TO MSB; . RAW MATERIAL PILES

STORED INSIDE OF THE MSB. THE PILES V/ILL INCLUDE

LIMESTONE, ALUMINA SOURCES (E.G. BAUXITE, CLAY, AND

coAL ASH), rRON SOURCES (È.c. MrLL SCALE AND IRON ORE),

SILICA SOURCES (8.G. SAND), AND ADDITIVES (E.G. FELDSPAR); .

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT INCLUDING PORTAL

RECLAIMERS, STACKERS, BELT CONVEYORS, CONVEYOR FROM

THE MSB TO THE RAW MILL, CONTROL SYSTEN{/ANALYZER, ETC.;

. AN IN-LINE RAV/ MILL THAT SIMULTANEOUSLY DRIES RAV/

MATERIALS USING THE EXHAUST GAS FROM THE KILN,PHIC,

AND CLINKER COOLER; . A PREHEATER WITH STAGED

COMBUSTION AND SELECTIVE NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTION

(SNCR) SYSTEM; . AN AIR HEATER FOR USE WHEN ADDITIONAL

DRYING CAPACITY IS REQUIRED; . A NOMINAL 1O,OOO TON

BLENDING SILO; . AN INDIRECT-FIRING SYSTEM WITH A LOWNOX MAIN KILN BURNER CAPABLE OF BURNING COAL,

PETROLEUM COKE, FUEL OIL, AND NATURAL GAS; . A WHOLE

TIRE FEEDER SYSTEM; . A CLINKER COOLER WITH

RECIPROCATING GRATES, COOLING AIR FANS, AND HOT AIR

DUCTING TO THE KILN AND PH/C; . CLINKER STORAGE AND

GRINDING INCLUDING A FINISH MILL WITH AIR SEPARATOR,

CLINKER SILOS WITH METERING DEVICE, LIMESTONE AND

GYPSUM PILES, AND ASSOCIATED CONVEYORS; . A CEMENT

TRANSFER AND STORAGE FACILITY INCLUDING TRUCK

LOADOUT AND PACKHOUSE; AND . A NOMINAL 18 TPH COAL

AND PETROLEUM COKE GRINDING SYSTEM WITH ASSOCIATED

MILL, STORAGE FACILITY, CONVEYORS, INCLUDING A FABRIC

FILTER BAGHOUSE.

Affected Boundaries: AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY

*Limit (Class 1 Area or Chassahowitzka

Name of the border of the

http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class 1 CLASS1

or Intl Border):

Distance: 30.00

Class 1 Area State: FL

Page 18 of229

Facility-wide Emissions : AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY

*Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 1588.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 1068.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 156.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions I 10.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 66.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL

Throughput: 125.00

Throughput Unit: ton/h clinker

Process Notes: THE CLINKER PRODUCTION RATE OF THE KILN SHALL NOT

EXCEED 125 TONS pER HOUR (24-HOUR ROTLING AVERAGE) AND

1,O95,OOO TONS DURING ANY CONSECUTIVE 12 MONTH PERIOD.

ONLY THE FOLLOWING AUTHOzuZED FUELS SHALL BE FIRED IN

THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM (KILN AND CALCINER): COAL,

PETROLEUM COKE, WHOLE OR CHIPPED TIRES, NATURAL GAS,

AND NO. 2 FUEL OIL AND/OR ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL.

THE MAXIMUM HEAT INPUT RATE TO THE PYROPROCESSING

SYSTEM (KILN AND CALCINER) SHALL NOT EXCEED 9,600 MMBTU

PER DAY (NOMTNALLY 400 MMBTU/HR).

Pollutant Information: AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY - CEMENT PYROPROCESSING

SYSTEM

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

xControl Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Description:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 19 of229

Emission Limit 1: 29000

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIT CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 30-DAY AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 362.5000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 30-DAY AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides G.fOx) *Control Method Code: A

xControl Method SELECTIVE NON CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR) LOV/ NOX Description: BURNERS INDIRECT FIRING STAGED COMBUSTION

EmissionLimit 1: 1.9500

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/T CLINKER

Emission Limit I Avg. 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE

Time/Condiìion:

Emission Limit2: 243.8000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 30-DAY ROLLING AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1530

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBITON CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. ANNUAL TEST

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 19.1300

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. ANNUAL TEST

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

http:llcfpnb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIT CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 24-HR ROLLING

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 15.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 24-HR ROLLING

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1200

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/T CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 30-DAY BLOCK

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 15.0000

Emission Limit 2Unt: LBÆI

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 30-DAY BLOCK

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT deci'sions?:

*Pollutant Name Dioxins & Furans

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000

Emission Limit I unit: NG/DSCM (TEQ)

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4000

Emission Limit 2Unit: NG/DSCM (TEQ)

F.mission Limit 2 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Mercury

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Page2} of229

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 122.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: LBll2 MONTH

Emission Limit 1 Avg. ROLLING TOTAL

Time/Condition:

Emission Límit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Hydrocarbons, Total

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 50.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: PPMVD AS PROPANE

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 30-DAY BLOCK

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2l of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: 1,1/25/2009 Control teôhnology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: SUMTER/CENTER HILL CEMENT PLANT

RBLC ID: FL-0281 ' *Corporate/Company SUMTER CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

Name:'

*Facility Name: SUMTER/CENTER HILL CEMENT PLANT

Facility State: FL

Facility ZIP Code: 33514

Facility ContactName: DAN FzuTZ

Facility Contact Phone: 3869355000

Facility Contact Email: DRFRITZ(@VENAINC.COM

Agency Name: FLORIDA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTLA PROTECTION

Agency Contact: MS. TERESA HERON

Agency Phone: (850)921-9529

Agency Email: teresa.heron(â,dep.state.fl.us

NAICS: 327310

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Permit Issuance Date:

Date determination last

updated:

Permit Type:

Facility Description:

Other Permitting

Information:

Page 22 of229

0210712006 ACT

r010212007

A: NEV//GREENFIELD FACILITY

SUMTER CEMENT COMPANY (SCC) PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A

DRY PROCESS PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT WITH A NOMINAL

CAPACITY OF 1,715,500 TONS pER YEAR (Tpy) OF CLINKER.

MAJOR EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE MAIN COMPONENTS

OF THE PLANT WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: . A RAW

MATERIALS STORAGE BUILDING (MSB) AND A LIMESTONE

STORAGE BUILDING; . A PRIMARY CRUSHER AT THE QUARRY

AND BELT CONVEYORS TO MSB; . RAW MATERIAL PILES STORED

INSIDE OF THE STORAGE BUILDINGS. THE PILES WILL INCLUDE

LIMESTONE, ALUMINA SOURCES (E.G. BAUXITE AND COAL ASH),

IRON SOURCES (E.G. MILL SCALE, SLAG, AND IRON ORE), SLICA

SOURCES (E.G. SAND, AND CLAY), AND ADDITIVES (E.G.

FELDSPAR, AND GYPSUM); . MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT

INCLUDING RECLAIMERS, STACKERS, BELT CONVEYORS,

COVERED CONVEYORS FROM THE MSB AND LIMESTONE

STORAGE BUILDING TO THE RAW MILL, CONTROL

SYSTEM/ANALYZER, ETC.; . AN IN-LINE RAV/ MILL THAT

SIMULTANEOUSLY DRIES RAW MATERIALS USING THE EXHAUST

GAS FROM THE KILN, PH/C, AND CLINKER COOLER; . A

PREHEATER V/ITH STAGED COMBUSTION CALCINER AND

SELECTIVE NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR) SYSTEM; . AN

AIR HEATER FOR USE WHEN ADDITIONAL DRYING CAPACITY IS

REQUIRED; . A NOMINAL 12,000 TON PER DAY BLENDING SILO; .

AN INDIRECT-FIRING SYSTEM V/ITH A LOV/ NOX MAIN KILN

BURNER CAPABLE OF BURNING COAL, PETROLEUM COKE, FUEL

OIL, AND NATURAL GAS; . A WHOLE TIRE FEEDER AND/OR TIRE

GASIFICATION SYSTEM. . A CLINKER COOLER WITH COOLING AIR

FANS, AND HOT AIR DUCTING TO THE KILN, PH/C, AND RAW

MILL; ' CLINKER STORAGE AND GRINDING INCLUDING TV/O

FINISH MILLS WITH AIR SEPARATORS, CLINKER SILOS WITH

METERING DEVICES, LIMESTONE AND GYPSUM BINS AND

ASSOCIATED CONVEYORS; . CEMENT TRANSFER AND STORAGE

SILOS, TRUCK LOADOUTS AND PACKHOUSE; AND . A NOMINAL

28.4 TP}{ COAL AND/OR PETROLEUM COKE GRINDING SYSTEM

WITH ASSOCIATED MILL, STORAGE FACILITY, ASSOCIATED

CONVEYORS, AND EQUIPPED V/ITH A FABRIC FILTER BAGHOUSE.

Affected Boundaries: SUMTER/CENTER HILL CEMENT PLANT

*Limit (Class 1 Area or Chassahowitzka

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class I CLASSl

or Intl Border):

Distance:

Class 1 Area Státe:

62.00

FL

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report Page23 of229

Facility-wide Emissions : SUMTER/CENTER HILL CEMENT PLANT

*Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 2488.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 1675.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 388.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulflu Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 173.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 99.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : SUMTER/CENTER HILL CEMENT PLANT

*Process Name: CEMENT PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 208.30

Throughput Unit: TÆ{ CLINKER

PTOCEss Notes: 1,715,500 TON CLINKER DURING ANY CONSECUTIVE 12 MONTH pEzuoD. 208.3 TON/HR (24-HR ROLLTNG AVERAGE) FUEL

MAXIMUM HEAT INPUT: 15,300 MMBTU/DAY (NOMINALLY 638

MMBTU/HR). ONLY THE FOLLOWING AUTHOzuZED FUELS SHALL

BE FIRED IN THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM (KILN AND

CALCINER): COAL, PETROLEUM COKE, FLY ASH, GASIFIED TIRES,

WHOLE OR CHIPPED TIRES, NATURAL GAS, DISTILLATE OIL,

AND/OR ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL. THE MAXIMUM

HEAT INPUT RATE TO THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM (KILN AND

CALCINER) SHALL NOT EXCEED 15,300 MMBTU PER DAY

G\TOMINALLY 63 8 MMBTU/HR).

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: SUMTER/CENTER HILL CEMENT PLANT - CEMENT PYROPROCESSING

SYSTEM

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2.9000

EMiSSiON LiMit 1 UNit: LBIT CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 3O-DAYS ROLLING

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2: 604.1000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 3O-DAYS ROLLING

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page24 of229

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method SELECTIVE NON CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR) LOW NOX Description: BURNERS INDIRECT FIRING STAGED COMBUSTION

Emission Limit 1: 1.9500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 3O-DAYS ROLLING AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 406.1900

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 30-DAYS ROLLING AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1530

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIT CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. ANNUAL TEST

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 31.8700

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. ANNUAL TEST

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method HYDRATED LIME INJECTION

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 24-H ROLLING

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll2S12009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2: 41.6600

Emission Limit 2Unít: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 24-H ROLLING

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1150

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIT CLINKER

Emission Limit I Avg. 30-DAY BLOCK

Time/Condition:

Emission Limlt2: 23.9500

Emission Limit 2Unít: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. 30-DAY BLOCK

Time/Condition;

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Dioxins & Furans

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000

Emission Limit 1 unit: NG/DSCM (TEQ)

Emission Limit 1 Avg. ANNUAL TEST

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4000

Emission Limit 2unit: NG/DSCM (TEQ)

Emission Limit 2 Avg. ANNUAL TEST

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisionS?:

*Pollutant Name Mercury

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 184.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB

Emission Limit 1 Avg. TOTAL FOR 12-MONTH ROLLING AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Page25 of229

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Hydrocarbons, Total

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 50.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: PPMVD AS PROPANE

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 30-DAY BLOCK

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

' considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page26 of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: Ia/25/2009 Controf Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: HOLCIM (US), INC.

RBLC ID:

*Corporate/Company

Name:

*Facility Name: HOLCIM (US), INC.

Facility State: MS

Facility ZIP Code: 39136

Facility ContactName: JAMES BOYD

Facility ContactPhone: 6622725121

Facility Contact Email :

Agency Name: MISSISSPPI DEPT OF ENV QUALITY

Agency Contact: MS. CARLA BROWN

Agency Phone: (601) 961-5235

Agency Email: CARLA_BROWN(øDEQ.STATE.MS.US

NAICS: 32t3t0

Permit Issuance Date: 0812012004 ACT

Date determinationlast 0210812005

updated:

Permit Type:

MS-0071

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page27 of229

Facility Description: THIS IS A V/ET PROCESS CEMENT (PORTLAND) MANUFACTURING

PLANT. THE PROJECT UNDER REVIEV/ WAS

Other Permitting

Information:

Facility-wide Emissions : HOLCIM (IJS),INC.

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides G.fOx)

Facility-wide Emissions -40.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : HOLCIM (US),INC.

*Process Name: POPRTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 650000.00

Throughput Unit: TON CLINKER/YR

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: HOLCIM (US), INC. - POPRTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Bmission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆ

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2625.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

NorE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: '1,L/25/2009 control- Technorogy Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: LEHIGH CEMENT CoMpANy - MASON CITY PLANT

RBLC ID: IA-0070 *Corporate/Company LEHIGHCEMENTCOMPANY

Name:

http:llcþub.epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page28 of229

*Facility Name: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

Facility State: IA

Facility ZIP Code: 50401

Facility ContactName: RITA DLINN

Facility ContactPhone: 6414213459

Facility ContactEmail: RDUNN@LEHIGHCEMENT.COM

Agency Name: IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ' Agency Contact: MR. GARY SMITH

Agency Phone: (515) 281-4635

Agency Email: GARY.SMITH@DNR.STATE.IA.US NAICS: 327310

Permit Issuance Date: l2llll2003 ACT

Date determination last 0211512007

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEW PROCESS TO EXISTING FACILITY

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

Facility Description: PLEASE NOTE THAT A WET SCRUBBER WAS ADDED FOR BACT

WHICH RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN PLANT EMISSIONS OF

SO2 OF AROUND 5,400 TONS/YR. THE TABLE BELO'W DOES NOT

ALLOW NEGATIVE NUMBERS.

Other Permitting PROJECT NUMBER 2003-490 AND 05-282. THE PERMIT NUMBER 'Information: LISTED ABOVE IS THE FACILITY"S PLANT NUMBER.

Facility-wide Emissions : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Pollutant Name: CarbonMonoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 918.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (I.{Ox)

Facility-wide Emissions 444.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 219.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 29.8000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: KILN/CALCINER/PREHEATER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 150.00

Throughput Unit: TlH

Process Notes: Throughput is t clinker/h

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON cITy PLANT

htfp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

KILN/CAL CINER/PREHEATER

Page29 of229

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method ESP.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.5160

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LBIT OF CLINKER

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Untt:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)'

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method ESP.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.5160

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LP,IT

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LB/TON OF CLINKER

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method ESP.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 15.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unil

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

http://cfpub .epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 I112512009
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method WET SCRUBBER.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 1.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LB,IT

Emission Limit I Avg. LB,Æ OF CLINKER

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 530.3000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factörs, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 30 of229

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method SNCR, LOW NOX BURNERS, COMBUSTION CONTROLS, AND

Description: PROPER KILN DESIGN.

Emission Limit l: 2.8500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LBIT OF CLINKER

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1496.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PROPER KILN DESIGN AND OPERATION.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 3.7000

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LBIT OF CLINKE

Time/Condition:

. Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

Page 31 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

xProcess Name: CLINKER COOLER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 150.00

Throughput Unit: TiH

Process Notes: Throughput is t/h raw feed

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - CLINKER

COOLER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE. ALL LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT AND BACK HALF

Description: EMISSIONS.

Emission Limit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

' *Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Límit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 32 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: BUCKET ELEVATOR FEED - CEMENT SILO

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 275.00

Throughput Unit: TlfI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - BUCKET

ELEVATOR FEED . CEMENT SILO

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE. ALL LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT AND BACK HALF

Description: EMISSIONS.

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

EmissionLimit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE. THERE IS ALSO A NAAQS LIMIT OF 0.34 LBIÍL ALL Description: LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT AND BACK HALF EMISSIONS.

http://cfpub .epa.govlrblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TimelCondition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 33 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: SHIPPING DISCHARGE SPOUTS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 385.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes: There are 2 spouts (A&B). Each has its own emission point. The limits are the

same for both emission points.

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - SHIPPING

DISCHARGE SPOUTS

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology '

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

'Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 34 of229

Particulate matter, filterable <

A

BAGHOUSE.

0.0090

GR/DSCF

Visible Emissions (VE)

A

BAGHOUSE.

5.0000

% OPACITY

l0 ¡r (FPMI0)

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name:

*Process Type:

Primary Fuel:

AIRSLIDES & SIOS - CEMENT SILO

90.028

http://cfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl2S12009
Format RBLC Report

Throughput: 275.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Page 35 of229

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - AIRSLIDES &

SILOS - CEMENT SILO

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*ContToI Method BAGHOUSE. ALL LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT AND BACK HALF Description: EMISSIONS.

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE. THERE IS ALSO A NAAQS LIMIT OF 1.16 LBiH. ALL Description: LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT AND BACK HALF EMISSIONS.

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 36 o1229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: PAN & BUCKET ELEVATORS - CLINKER SILO

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 165.00

Throughput Unit: TÆI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - PAN & BUCKET

ELEVATORS - CLINKER SILO

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

ilmission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2UniT:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009
Format RBLC Report

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page37 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: PAN CONVEYOR & SILO - CLINKER SILO

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 165.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - PAN CONVEyOR

& SILO - CLINKER SILO

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 0.0090

Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2.:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

http:/lcfpub.epa.govirblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors; other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 38 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: SILO WITHDRAWAL

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 330.00

Throughput Unit: TlÍI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY . MASON CITY PLANT - SILO

WITHDRAWAL

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 I112512009
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 39 of229

A

BAGHOUSE.

0.0090

GR/DSCF

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Ltmit2

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http://cfpub .epa.govhblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 IIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

Page 40 of229

*Process Name: CONVEYOR AND ELEVATORS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 220.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes: There are 2 units with the exact same limits. One is the Cement Roll Press

Feed Conv & Elev and the other is the Cement Mill Feed Conv & Bucket

Elev.

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - CONVEYOR AND

ELEVATORS

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*ContTol Method BAGHOUSE. ALL LIMITS INCLUDE FRONT AND BACK HALF Description: EMISSIONS.

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

: 5.0000

Unit: % OPACITY

Page 4l of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: SEPARATOR VENT - CLINKER PREGRIND

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 220.00

Throughput Unit: TIII

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - SEPARATOR

VENT - CLINKER PREGRIND

xPollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 0.0100

Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMlO) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IllZ5l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

ôonsiderations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 42 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT coMPANy - MASON cITy PLANT

*Process Name: MATERIAL TRANSFER TO SCRUBBER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 100.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes: There are 2 identical emission units. They each have their own emission

points and the limits are the same.

POIIUtANt INfOTmation: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - MATERIAL

TRANSFER TO SCRUBBER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 43 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON cITy PLANT

*Process Name: MATERIAL TRANSFER FROM SCRUBBER.

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 25.00

http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report Page 44 of229

Throughput Unit: TlÍI

Process Notes: There are 3 identical emission units. Each has its own emission point and the

emission limits are the same.

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - MATERIAL

TRANSFER FROM SCRUBBER.

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations infl uence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Lifhit 1 unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 45 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: SECONDARY FUEL HANDLING

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 110.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes: There are 2 secondary fuel receiving emission units and 2 secondary fuel

conveying emission units. Each unit has its own baghouse and emission point.

The limits are all the same for these units. See facility notes for fuel types.

POIIutant InfoTmation: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - SECONDARY

FUEL HANDLING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0090

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) ' *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other th'en air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 46 of229

Process Information : LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT

*Process Name: SECONDARY MATERIAL HANDLING

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: ' Throughput: 110.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

PTOCess Notes: THERE ARE 2 SEC. MATEzuAL RECEIVING UNITS AND 2 SEC. MAT.

CONVEYING UNITS. EACH EMISSION UNIT HAS ITS OWN

BAGHOUSE AND EMISSION POINT. ALL OF THE EMISSION UNITS

ARE THE SAME.

POIIutAnt InfoTmation: LEHIGH CEMENT COMPANY - MASON CITY PLANT - SECONDARY

MATERIAL HANDLING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE,.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l20Og
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emissiontimit 1Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

Page 47 of229

Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

A

BAGHOUSE.

0.0100

GR/DSCF

Visible Emissions (VE)

A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

NorE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC rD.

Report Date: tt/zs/zoo9 control Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: ROANOKE CEMENT

RBLC ID:

*Corporate/Company

Name:

vA-0283

Roanoke Cement Company

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill-istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Facility Name:

Facility State:

Facility ZIP Code:

Facility Contact Name:

Facility Contact Phone:

Facility Contact Email:

Agency Name:

Agency Contact:

Agency Phone:

Agency Email:

NAICS:

Permit Issuance Date:

Date determination last

updated:

Permit Type:

Facility Description:

Other Permitting

Information:

Page 48 of229

ROANOKE CEMENT

VA

24t75

VIRGINIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR DIV.

MR. YOGESH DOSHI

(804)6e8-40t7

YNDOSHT@DEQ.VrRcrNrA. cOV

327310

0611312003 ACT

0612812004

B: ADD NEW PROCESS TO EXISTING FACILITY

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

CEMENT MANUFACTURING

Roanoke Cement is asking for the increase in CO emission levels for the No.

5 kiln system based on the expectation of continued increase in carbon in the

rock strata supplying raw material. No physical changes were made at the

facility, i.e., there was no increase in permitted throughput.

Process Information : ROANOKE CEMENT

*Process Name:

*Process Type:

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

CEMENT KILN SYSTEM, #5

90.028

COAL

1300000.00

T/YR

Throughput is clinker production. The No. 5 kiln system (main stack) includes

the original hot rotary end, recent six stage preheater/precãlciner tower, both

original raw mills (normally heated by the kiln's exhaust from the preheater)

and the kiln's recently replaced alkali bypass system.

Pollutant Information: RoANOKE CEMENT - CEMENT KrLN sysrEM, #5

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method Code: P

*CONtTOI MEthOd PROCESS CONTROLiGOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Descriptioni

Emission Limit l: 3.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 II/25/2009
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 49 of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: 11'/25/2009 Controf Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: GCC DACOTAH

RBLC ID: sD-0003 *CorporatelCompany GCC DACOTAH

Name: *Facilþ Name: GCC DACOTAH

Facility State: SD

Facility ZIP Code: 57709

Facility ContactName: GENE NELSON

Facility Contact Phone: 605-721-7033

Facility Contact Email: GNELSON@GCC.COM

Agency Name: SOUTH DAKOTA DEPT OF WATER & NAT'L RES

Agency Contact: MR. BRIAN GUSTAFSON

Agency Phone: (605)7730-3151

Agency Email:

NAICS: 327310

Permit Issuance Date: 0411012003 ACT

Date determination last 0910512003

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEW PROCESS TO EXISTING FACILITY

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

Facility Description: GCC DACOTAH QUARRYS LIMESTONE, SAND, AND GYPSUM IN

THE SURROUNDING AREA TO PROVIDE RAV/ MATERIALS FOR ITS

PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT. OTHER RAW MATERIALS SUCH AS

IRON AND SHALE ARE SHIPPED IN BY TRUCK FROM OTHER

AREAS. COAL IS USED AS THE HEAT SOURCE AND IS SHIPPED IN

BY RAILCAR. THE LIMESTONE IS PROCESSED THROUGH

CRUSHERS AND SCREENS BEFORE CONVEYOR BELTS TRANSFER

IT TO A RAV/ MATERIAL STORAGE SHED. CONVEYORS TRANSFER

THE RAV/ MATERIAL TO MILLS. THE MILLS GRIND THE RAV/

MATERIAL FOR TWO V/ET KILN PROCESSES AND FOR A DRY KILN

PROCESS (ROTARY KILN #6). THE GROLTND MATERIAL IS

TEMPORAzuLY STORED IN SILOS BEFORE IT IS TRANSFERRED TO

THE KILNS. THE DRY KILN PROCESS INCLUDES A PREHEATER

AND A PRECALCINATOR. THE THREE KILNS PRODUCE CLINKER,

WHICH IS CONVEYED TO A CLINKER STORAGE SHED. THE

CLINKER IS THEN SENT TO THE FINISH MILLS V/HERE GYPSUM IS

ADDED TO PRODUCE CEMENT. THE CEMENT IS PNEUMATICALLY

TRANSFERRED TO CEMENT STORAGE SILOS BEFORE IT IS EITHER

BAGGED OR BULK LOADED IN TRUCKS AND RAILCARS.

Other Permitting GCC Dacotah owns and operates a limestone quaffy and portland cement Information: manufacturing facility in Rapid City, South Dakota. GCCDacotah submitted

htfp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page 50 of229

a Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit application for a modif,rcation

that occurred in 1996 to rotary kiln #6. Rotary kiln #6 burns coal to produce

heat, which transforms limestone and other raw materials into clinker.

Gypsum is added to the clinker and ground to produce portland cement. The

modification increased the production capacity of rotary kiln #6 from 1,650 to

2,250 tons of clinker per day.

Affected Boundaries: GCC DACOTAH

*Limit (Class 1 Area or Badlands

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class 1 CLASS1

or Intl Border):

Distance:

50.00

70.00

Class 1 Area State: SD

*Limit (Class 1 Area or Wind Cave NP

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class 1 CLASSl

or Intl Border):

Distance:

Class 1 Area State: SD

Facility-wide Emissions : GCC DACOTAH

*Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 2002.0000(Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 2267.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 235.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 885.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CRUSHERS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: LIMESTONE Throughput: 1000.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 II/2512009
Format RBLC Report Page 51 of 229

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CRUSHERS

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg,

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

A

FABzuC FILTER

0.0100

GR/DSCF

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name:

*Process Type:

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

SCREEN

90.028

LIMESTONE

1000.00

TIIT

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - SCREEN

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

A

FABRIC FILTER

0.0100

GR/DSCF

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

hrtp:llcfpttb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 52 of229

*Process Name: RAW MATERIAL TRANSFER; FROM STO GE TO KILN

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: LIMESTONE

Throughput: 180.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes: TRANSFER FROM RAW MATEzuAL STORAGE BUILDING TO TWO

KILN FEED storage silos

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - RAW MATERIAL TRANSFER, FROM STORAGE TO

KILN

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, f,rlterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: ROCK SILO TO LOESCHE MILL

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 180.00

Throughput Unit: TI}J

Process Notes: Throughput is limestone

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - RocK sILo To LOESCHE MILL

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

http://cfpub .epa.govlrblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 53 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: STORAGE SILO, KILN FEED TO KILN #6

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 160.00

Throughput Unit: TÆI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - STORAGE SILO, KILN FEED TO KILN #6

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:.

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: CLINKER SHED TO FINISH MILLS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 500.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - CLINKER SHED To FINISH MILLS

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

http://cfpub .epa.govhblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 T112512009
Format RBLC Report

xControl Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 54 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*PTocess Name: RAV/ MATERIAL TRANSFER, RAW SHED TO LOESCHE MILL *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 40.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

POIIutAnt InfoTmation: GCC DACOTAH - RAVI MATEzuAL TRANSF.ER, RAV/ SHED TO

LOESCHE MILL

*PollutantName Particulate maltet,filterable < 10 F GPMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: RAV/ MATEzuAL TRANSFER, FROM BELT CoNVEyoR 107 *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestJimeout:500 1112512009
Format RÐLC Report

Throughput: 800.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Page 55 of229

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - RAW MATERIAL TRANSFER, FROM BELT

CONVEYOR 107

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

: 0.0100

Unit: GR/DSCF

Avg. \

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: RAW MATERIAL TRANSFER,RAV/ SHED (2) TO LOESCHE MILL *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 40.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - RAV/ MATEzuAL TRANSFER,RAV/ SHED (2) TO

LOESCHE MILL

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 F GPM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 56 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: GYPSUM RAV/ SHED (2)

*Process Type: 90.024

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 350.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes: Transfer to old clinker bldg. Two identical units.

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - GYPSUM RAW SHED (2)

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: PENTHOUSE STORAGE #2 (Ì.{ORTH #1)

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: CLINKER Throughput: 2250.00

Throughput Unit: TID

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - PENTHOUSE STORAGE #2 G\IORTH #1)

*FollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAtlFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 57 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: PENTHOUSE STORAGE#2 (NORTH #2)

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: CLINKER Throughput: 2250.00

Throughput Unit: TID

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - PENTHOUSE STORA3E #2 (NORTH #2)

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technolirgy

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: PENTHOUSE STORAGE#2 (NORTH #3)'

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: CLINKER Throughput: 2250.00

Throughput Unit: TID

Process Notes:

http.,lbfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 58 of229

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - PENTHOUSE STORAGE #2 (NORTH #3)

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: ROCK SILO DISCHARGE

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 1000.00

Throughput Unit: TlfI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - ROCK SILO DISCHARGE

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0,0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

hnp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page 59 of229

*Process Name: ROTARY KILN #6

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: CLINKER Throughput: 2250.00

Throughput Unit: TID

Process Notes: Rotary kiln #6 bums coal as aheat source. Approximately 35Yo of the coal is

burned in the preheaterþrecalcinator and the remaining 65Yà of the coal is

burned in the main burner of the kiln. The emission limits for NOx, SO2, and

CO are for the entire kiln system. The kiln system has three emission points (1

- Rotary kiln #6, 2 - ALkali bpyass and alkali waste to waste bin transfer

system, and 3 - coal Mill) compliance with the So2, co, and Nox emission

limtis will be based on continuous emission monitoring systems.

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - ROTARY KILN #6

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 11.9500

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: P

*CONtToI Method INHERENT SCRUBBING EFFECT OF PROCESSING LIMESTONE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 632.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆI

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 885.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method PREHEATER/PRECALCINATOR SYSTEM

Description:

Emission Limit l: 2267.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 3250.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2002.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 60 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

+Process Name: CLINKER COOLER, DRY PROCESS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: CLINKER Throughput: 2250.00

Throughput Unit: TID

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - CLINKER cooLER, DRy PROCESS

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l20;09
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 8.5900

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 61 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: MATEzuAL TRANSFER, ALKALI

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: CLINKER Throughput: 2250.00

Throughput Unit: TID

Process Notes: Process is alkali bypass and alkali waste to waste bin transfer. The emission

limits for Nox, so2, and co are for the entire kiln system. The kiln system

has three emission points (1 - Rotary kiln #6, 2 - Alkali bpyass and alkali ' waste to waste bin transfer system, and 3 - coal Mill) compliance with the

SO2, CO, and NOx emission limits will be based on continuous emission

monitoring systems.

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - MATERIAL TRANSFER, ALKALI

*Pollutant Name Particulate mattet, f,rlterable < 10 p (FPMI0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.3600

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influqnce

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method

http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2267.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 62 of229

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: P

*COntToI Method INHERENT SCRUBBING EFFECT OF PROCESSING LIMESTONE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 632.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 885.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR ' Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 3250.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2002.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

xProcess Name: FINISH MILL #3

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 35.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Page 63 of229

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - FINISH MILL #3

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpMl0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: FINISH MILL #4

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 40.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes:

' Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - FINISH MILL #4

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, f,rlterable < r0 lr (FpMlO) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GRiDSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unt:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll125/2009
Format RBLC Report

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 64 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: FINISH MILL #5

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 45.00

Throughput Unit: TlÍI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - FINISH MILL #5

xPollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2IJnit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: FINISH MILL #6

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 45.00

Throughput Unit: TI}J

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - FINISH MILL #6

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 65 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

+Process Name: FINISH MILL #l (MILL SWEEP)

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 85.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - FINISH MILL #7 (MILL SWEEP)

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Ernission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

EmiSsion Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: FINISH MILL #7 (MILL SEPARATOR)

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 85.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Il/2512009
Format RBLC Report Page 66 of229

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - FINISH MILL #7 (MILL SEPARATOR)

+Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filteiable < 10 F (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

þmission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: FINISH MILL #7 (TRANSFER)

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 500.00

Throughput Unit: TlfI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - FINISH MILL #7 (TRANSFER)

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

, Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http:llcfpttb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Prooess Information : GCC DACOTAH

Page 67 of229

+Process Name: FINISH MILL #7 (TRANSFER #2)

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 500.00

Throughput Unit: TI}J

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - FINISH MILL #7 (TRANSFER #2)

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: CLINKER TRANSFER SYSTEM

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 500.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - CLINKER TRANSFER sysrEM

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

. EmissionLimit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

http:llcþub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/25/2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 68 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #1

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 125.00

Throughput Unit: TIIJ

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - BULK STORAGE SILOS #1

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10)

xControl Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #2

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 125.0i0

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - BULK sroRAGE sll-os #2

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 69 of229

: 0.0100

Unit: GR/DSCF

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #3

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 125.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Pollutantlnformation: GCC DACOTAH - BULK STORAGE SILOS #3

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:'

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

+Process Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #4

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 125.00

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25lZ00g
Format RBLC Report

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Page 70 of229

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - BULK STORAGE SILOS #4

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: BULK STORAGE SILOS #5

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 200.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - BULK STORAGE SILOS #5

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

hnp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Repofs/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report PageTI of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: RAIL STORAGE SILOS #1

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 125.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - RAIL STORAGE SILOS #1

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

EmiSsion Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT dêcisions?:

Process Information: GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: RAIL STORAGE SILOS #2

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 125.00

Throughput Unit: TI}J

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - RAIL STORAGE SILOS #2

*Pollutant Name Particulate matler, filterable < l0 F (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 72 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: RAIL STORAGE SILOS #3

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 125.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - RAIL STORAGE SILOS #3

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description: ' Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TirÌre/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: BULK RAIL LOADOUTS #l

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 500.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - BULK RAIL LoADours #1

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 F GPM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page73 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: BULK RAIL LOADOUTS #2

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 500.00

Throughput Unit: TÆI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - BULK RAIL LOADOUTS #2

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: .

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: EAST BULK TRUCK LOADOUT

*Process Type: 90.028

http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblclReports/RptDetaill.istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 500.00

Throughput Unit: TlÍI

Process Notes:

Page74 of229

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - EAST BULK TRUCK LOADOUT

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: BULK TRUCK LOADOUT, V/EST

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 500.00

Throughput Unit: TIIJ

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - BULK TRUCK LoADour, 'WEST

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page75 of229

Process Information: GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: CEMENT BAGGING #1

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 114.00

- Throughput Unit: TÆI

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - CEMENT BAGGING #1

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: CEMENT BAGGING #2

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 114.00

Throughput Unit: TIIJ

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - CEMENT BAGGING #2

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

. pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page76 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: CEMENT BAGGING #3

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 114.00

Throughput Unit: TIIJ

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - CEMENT BAGGING #3

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: COAL MILL

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 20.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes: The emission limits for NOx, SO2, and CO are for the entire kiln system. The

kiln system has three emission points (1 - Rotary kiln #6, 2 - Alkali bpyass

and alkali waste to waste bin transfer system, and 3 - Coal Mill) Compliance

http:/icþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

. 

Page77 of229

with the SO2, CO, and NOx emission limtis will be based on continuous

emission monitoring systems.

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - COAL MILL

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.0900

Emission Limit 2Unif: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfrr Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: P

*COntToI Method INHERENT SCRUBBING EFFECT OF PROCESSING LIMESTONE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 632.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 885.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PREHEATER/PRECALCINATOR SYSTEM

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2267.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 3250.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2002.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 78 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: COAL STACKER TOP

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 400.00

. Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - COAL STACKER TOp

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < l0 p (FpM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblo/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

Page79 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: COAL SURGE BIN TOP (2)

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 400.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes: 2 identical units

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - COAL SURGE BIN TOP (2)

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Límit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: COAL TUNNEL TO COAL STACKER

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 400.00

Throughput Unit: TIII

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - COAL TLTNNEL To COAL STACKER

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Emisdion Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 80 of229

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: COAL TRANSFER

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 400.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - COAL TRANSFER

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10'p (FPM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABzuC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

eonsiderations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: COAL BIN #6

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: Throughput: 400.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - COAL BIN #6

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report Page 81 of229

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

tControl Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission L,imit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: COAL DRYER - FK PUMP

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 20.00

Throughput Unit: TI}J

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - COAL DRYER - FK PUMP

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : GCC DACOTAH

*Process Name: COAL HOPPER TO CONVEYOR

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 400.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes:

Page 82 of229

Pollutant Information: GCC DACOTAH - COAL HOPPER TO CONVEYOR

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, f,rlterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 0.0100

Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: 1'1-/25/2009 Control- Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

RBLC ID: MO-0059 *Corporate/Company CONTINENTALCEMENTCOMPANY

Name:

*Facility Name: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

Facility State: MO

Facility ZIP Code: 63401

Facility ContactName: JERRY EPPERSON

Facility Contact Phone: 573 221-1740

Facility Contact Email:

Agency Name: MISSOUzu DNR, AIR POLL CONTROL PROGRAM

Agency Contact: MS. KYRA MOORE

Agency Phone: (573) 526-3835

Agency Email: KYRA.MOORE@DNR.MO.GOV NAICS: 327310

Permit Issuance Date: 0912412002 ACT

Date determination last 0911712003

updated:

Permit Type: A: NEV//GREENFIELD FACILITY

FACiIitY DESCTiPtiON: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY INTENDS TO REPLACE ITS

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Other Permitting

Information:

Page 83 of229

EXISTING CEMENT KILN WITH A NEIW, LARGER CAPACITY

CEMENT KILN. THE NEW KILN IS DESIGNED TO INCREASE

ANNUAL PRODUCTION OF CLINKER FROM 0.6 MILLION TONS TO

1.6 MILLION TONS. THE NEV/ OPERATIONS WILL INCLUDE A

FUTURE LINDERGROTIND LIMESTONE MINE, A SHALE QUARRY, A

RAW FEED MATEzuAL STORAGE AND CONVEYING SYSTEM, DRY

PROCESS MILLING, A PREHEATER PRECALCINER KILN SYSTEM,

CONVERSION OF THE EXISTING WET RAW MILL TO A FINISH

MILL, AND ADDITIONAL ALTERNATIVE FUEL STORAGE AND

FEED SYSTEMS. THE RAW MATERIAL IS SIZED AND BLENDED

INTO A FINE POWDER. IN THE PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM THE

RAV/ MATERIAL IS TRANSFORMED INTO SPHERICALLY SHAPED

NODULES CALLED CLINKERS. THE NEV/ PYROPROCESSING

SYSTEM WILL CONSIST OF A PREHEATER WITH A PYROCLON IN A

VERTICAL TOV/ER CONFIGURATION. A PRECALCINER, LOCATED

AT THE BASE OF THE TOWER, WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A MAIN

BURNER AND A LOW NOX BURNER. THE PYROCLON UNIT IS

DESIGNED TO REDUCE CO EMISSIONS FOLLOWING THE LOW NOX

BURNERS IN THE PRECALCINER. IN ADDITION, A SELECTIVE NONCATALYTIC REDUCTION SYSTEM (SNCR) WILL BE USED TO

INJECT AN AMMONIA-BASED MATERIAL INTO THE SYSTEM TO

REDUCE NOX EMISSIONS. LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES WILL BE

THE PRIMARY FUEL, 'WITH COAL AS A BACK-UP, IN THE

PYROPROCESSING SYSTEM. THE DIRECT COAL BURNING SYSTEM

WILL BE REPLACED BY AN INDIRECT SYSTEM THAT WILL

REQUIRE A HOT GAS GENERATOR, A NEW BAGHOUSE

COLLECTOR AND A COAL MILL STACK. TO ACCOMMODATE

ALTERNATIVE FUEL USAGE, NEV/ STORAGE TANKS WILL BE

ADDED FOR LIQUID ALTERNATIVE FUELS, AND A NEW SOLIDS

PROCESSING AND STORAGE BUILDING WILL BE ADDED FOR

SOLID ALTERNATIVE FUELS.

A NET EMISSIONS INCREASE ANALYSIS WAS CONDUCTED FOR

THIS PROJECT V/HICH DETERMINED THAT THE NET EMISSION

INCREASE FOR THE PROJECT V/OULD NOT EXCEED THE

SIGNIFICANT LEVEL FOR ANY AIR POLLUTANT. HOWEVER, FOR

THE NET EMISSIONS INCREASE TO BE LESS THAN THE

SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL, STRINGENT CONTROLS ARE MADE A PART

OF THE PERMIT. THESE CONTROLS INCLUDE THE USE OF FABRIC

FTLTERS (FOR pM10 CONTROL), A WET SCRUBBER AND LOW

SULFUR COAL FOR CONTROL OF SULFUR OXIDES, LOV/-NOX

BURNERS AND SELECTIVE NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SNCR)

FOR CONTROL OF NITROGEN OXIDES, A PYROCLON (OR SIMILAR

TYPE TINIT) AND A THERMAL OXIDIZER FOR CONTROL OF

CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS, AND A THERMAL OXIDIZER FOR

CONTROL OF VOC EMISSIONS. THE CONTROLS AND RESULTANT

EMISSIONS LIMITATIONS ARE SUCH THAT V/E URGE OTHER

AGENCIES PERMITTING CEMENT KILNS TO EXAMINE THESE

REQUIREMENTS.

Affected Boundaries: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC Report Page 84 o1229

*Limit (Class 1 Area or Hercules-Glades

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class 1 CLASSI

or Intl Border):

Distance: 320.00

Class I Area State: MO

*Limit (Class I Area or Mingo

Name of the border of the

U.S.):

Boundary Type (Class I CLASS1

or Intl Border):

Distance: 301.00

Class 1 Area State: MO

Facility-wide Emissions : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

*Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 176.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (l.lOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 2024.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

xPollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 320.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 608.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 48.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

*Process Name: ROTARY KILN

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 183.00

Throughput Unit: TI}J

Process Notes: Emissions from the rotary kiln and the pyroprocessing system are routed

through the same controls. Thus, emission limits for the kiln and

pyroprocessing system are the same. The pyroprocessing system transforms

raw materials into clinker. The clinker is then introduced to the rotary kiln.

The pyroprocessing system is fueled with liquid hazardous waste aná coal as

backup, 722.4 mmbtu/h. compliance verified by calculations.

Pollutant Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY,LLC - ROTARY KILN

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report Page 85 of229

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit l: 99.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % REDUCTION

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method WET SCRUBBER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 12.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIT

Emissiirn Limit I Avg. lb/t clinker, 3-hr rolling avg

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 10.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 2 Avg. lbit clinker, 24-ltr rolling avg

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

xPollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) *Control Method Code: B

*CONtToI Method SELECTIVE NON-CATALYTIC REDUCTION, Low NoX BURNERS, Description: TOP AIR DUCT.

Emission Limit 1: 8.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg. lb/t clinker, 30-day rolling avg

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

hltp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestIimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method PYROCLON

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Page 86 of229

: 12.0000

Unit: LBIT

Avg. lb/t clinker, l-hr rolling avg

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 10.0000

Emission Limit 2 Unit: LBIT

Emission Limit 2 Avg. lb/t clinker, 8-hr rolling avg

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

*Process Name: CRUSHING AND TRANSFER, LIMESTONE, UNDERGROUND

*Process Type: 90.024

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 227.80

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes: Net emission increase for the project does not xceed the significance level for

any air pollutant.

Pollutant Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC - CRUSHING AND

TRANSFER, LIMESTONE, UNDERGROLIND

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method BAGHOUSE, MOISTURE > 1.5 yo, AND PROCESS LOCATED .

Description: UNDERGROUND

Emission Limit 1: 99.1900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % REDUCTION

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY,LLC

Page 87 of229

*Process Name: QUARRYfNG - SHALE

*Process Type: 90.023

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 41.50

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

Pollutant Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY,LLC - QUARRYING - SHALE

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY,LLC

*Process Name: RAV/ MATEzuAL CRUSHER, SHALE AND CLAY *Process Type: 90.024

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 53.10

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC - RAw MATERIAL CRUSHER,

SHALE AND CLAY

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 99.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % REDUCTION

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 88 of229

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

*Process Name: ROLLER MILL CRUSHING

*Process Type: 90.024

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 284.90

Throughput Unit: TlÍI

Process Notes: Net emission increase less than signif,rcance level.

POIIUtANt INfoTmation: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC - ROLLER MILL CRUSHING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

*Process Name: CLINKER COOLER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 182.60

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC - CLINKER CooLER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 89 of229

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

*Process Name: FINISH MILL, CLINKER GRINDING, ELEVATOR

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 114.20

Throughput Unit: T/[I

Process Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

Pollutant Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY,LLC - FINISH MILL, CLINKER

GRINDING, ELEVATOR

xPollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit l:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Límit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

*Process Name: CEMENT HANDLING - BULK RAILCAR LOADING

*Process Type: 90.028

http:llcfptb.epa.gov/rblciReports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 191.80

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

Page 90 of229

Pollutant Information: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC - CEMENT HANDLING -

BULK RAILCAR LOADING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method BAGHOUSE, AND THROUGF{PUT LIMIT

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC

*Process Name: HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED FUEL VENT

*Process Type: 29.900

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 4.60

Throughput Unit: TlfI

Process Notes: Net emission increase less than significance level.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY, LLC - HAZARDOUS V/ASTE

DERIVED FUEL VENT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2}0g
Format RBLC Report

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page97 of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report DaEe: tt/zs/zoog Control- Technology Determinat.ions (Freeform)

Facility Information: CEMEX, fNC.

RBLC ID: AL-0200

*Corporate/Company CEMEX,INC.

Name:

*Facility Name: CEMEX,INC.

Facility State: AL

Facility ZIP Code: 36732

Facility Contact Name: MIKE GANDY

Facility ContactPhone: 334-284-4400

Facility Contact Email: MGANDY@CEMEXUSA.COM

Agency Name: ALABAMA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT

Agency Contact: MR. DALE HURST

Agency Phone: (334) 271-7882

Agency Email: ADH@ADEM.STATE.AL.US

NAICS: 3273t0

Permit Issuance Date: 0911312002 ACT

Datedeterminationlast 1211212003

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEV/ PROCESS TO EXISTING FACILITY

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

FacilityDescription: PORTLANDCEMENTMANUFACUTRING,

Other Permitting AIRS Facility Number: 01-091-00002 CEMEX manufactures portland Information: cement. This facility operates one kiln system, controlled by an ESP.

Facility-wide Emissions : CEMEX, INC.

*Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 2986. 0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 659.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 560.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : CEMEX, INC.

*Process Name: KILN, CEMENT

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL

Throughput: 230.00

Throughput Unit: TÆI

Process Notes:

Page 92 of229

Pollutant Information: CEMEX,INC. - KILN, CEMENT

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 160.0000

Unit: LB/H

Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emìssion Limit2: 0.8210

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LB/TON KILN FEED

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code:' N

*Control Method ' Description:

EmissionLimit l: 725.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 3.7200

. Emission Limit 2Unit: LBIT

EmissionLimit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 136.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBI}I

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2: 0.6980

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB,IT

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 93 of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: aa/25/2009 Contro] Technology Determinatj-ons (Freeform)

Facility Information: LAFARGE CORPORATION

RBLC ID: IA-0052 *Corporate/Company LAFARGECORPORATION

Name:

*Facility Name: LAFARGE CORPORATION

Facility State: IA

Facility ZIP Code: 52728

Facility ContactName: SCOTTNIELSON

Facility Contaòt Phone: (563) 328-6206

Facility Contact Email:

Agency Name: IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Agency Contact: MR. GARY SMITH

Agency Phone: (515) 281-4635

Agency Email: GARY.SMITH@,DNR.STATE.IA.US

NAICS: 3273t0

Permit Issuance Date: 0710112002 ACT

Date determination last 0110312003

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEV/ PROCESS To EXISTING FACILITY

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

Facility Description:

OthET PETMittiNg THIS PROJECT WAS TO ALLOV/ THE SOI-IRCE TO INCREASE THE INfOTmation: CAPACITY OF ITS PREHEATER/PRECALCINER KILN SYSTEM FROM

3O5O TONS OF CLINKER PER DAY TO 3488 TONS OF CLINKER PER

DAY. The latest modification was to allow waste oil as a fuel, to amend the

CO BACT limit and to write a PSD permit for the clinker cooler which was

not permitted under the previous project number (pN 96-464).

Process Information : LAFARGE CORPORATION

*PTOCESS NAME: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER KILN *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 3488.00

Throughput Unit: T/D

PTOCESS NOTES: COMPLIANCE WILL BE DETERMINED AFTER MODIFICATION. CEM

http:llcfptú.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report Page94 of229

FOR NOX, SOX AND OPACITY. KILN IS LIMITED TO USING FUEL

OIL, NATURAL GAS, COAL, AND COKE AS FUELS. IN ADDITION TO

CLAY AND STONE, THE KILN IS ALLOWED TO USE THE

FOLLOWING SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN LIMITED

QUANTITIES: COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUE, FOLINDRY BYPRODUCTS, HYDROCARBON CONTAINING SOILS, REFINERY BYPRODUCTS, AND OILS AND GREASES. THERE ARE MULTIPLE

POLLUTANT ENTRIES FOR TSP AND SO2 BECAUSE THEY HAVE

DIFFERENT BASES FOR THEIR EMISSION LIMITS. STACK TESTING

WAS PERFORMED FOR TSP, PMIO, CO AND D/F.

Pollutant Information: LAFARGE CORPORATION - CEMENT MANUFACTURING,

PREHEATER/PRECALCINER KILN

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method DRY SCRUBBER EQUIVALENT-NOT AN ADD ON CONTROL. LIME IS Description: GENERATED FROM LIMESTONE IN FEED AND COMES INTO

CONTACT WITH SO2 AND SOME SO2 CAPTURED IN WASTE KILN

DUST. A.LTERNATE EMISSION LIMIT IS NAAQS, ALSO 66,500 LBiD.

Emission Limit 1: 4850.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: TONS/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides G.fOx) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2546.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 4.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/TON OF CLINKER

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

htfp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?R.equestTimeout:500 Tll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 95 of229

Carbon Monoxide

P

GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

4.5000

LB/TON OF CLINKER

Dioxins & Furans

P

GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

0.4000

NG/DSCM

1.7000

E-10 GR/DSCF

*Pollutant Name Total Suspended Particulates

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE (LIMIT INCLUDES CONDENSIBLES). ALTERNATE LIMIT Description: IS PER TON oF FEED AND IS BASED oN MACT AND NSPS.

Emission Limit 1: 0.5160

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/TON OF CLINKER

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

EmisSion Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate mafrer, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE (LIMIT INCLUDES CONDENSIBLES)

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.5160

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/TON OF CLINKER

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 96 of229

Process Information : LAFARGE CORPORATION

*Process Name: CLINKER COOLER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 145.30

Throughput Unit: TONS OF CLINKER/H

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: LAFARGE coRPoRATIoN - CLINKER cooLER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method Code: A

ICONTTOI Method EXISTING BAGHOUSE. LIMITS INCLUDE CONDENSIBLES.

Description:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1:

Page97 o1229

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

0.01s0

Unit: GR/DSCF

Avg.

Particulate malfer, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

A

EXISTING BAGHOUSE. LIMITS INCLUDE CONDENSIBLES.

0.0150

GR/DSCF

Visible Emissions (VE)

A

EXISTING BAGHOUSE. THE 5% LIMIT IS OVER AN HOUR

AVERAGING PERIOD.

5.0000

%OPACITY

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " bêside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: 1,1,/25/2009 Control Technology Determinations (Freeform)

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1v25t2009
Format RBLC Report Page 98 of229

Facility Information: LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY

RBLC ID: MD-0027 *Corporate/Company LEHIGHPORTLANDCEMENTCOMPANY

Name:

*Facility Name: LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY

Facility State: MD

Facility ZIP Code: 21791

Facility ContactName: DAVID ROUSH

Facility Contact Phone: (410)775-1000

Facility Contact Email: DROUSH@LEHIGHCEMENT.COM

Agency Name: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Agency Contact: MR. V/ILLIAM PAUL

Agency Phone: (410)537-3230

Agency Email: bpaul@mde.state.md.us

NAICS:

Permit Issuance Date: 06/08/2000 ACT

Date determinationlast 0911812001

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEW PROCESS TO EXISTING FACILITY

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

FacilityDescription: PORTLANDCEMENTMANUFACTURINGPLANT

Other Permitting EPA ID: 24-13-00012. LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMpANY'S INfOTmation: UNION BRIDGE MODERNIZATION PROJECT INCLUDES THE

INSTALLATION OF A 5 STAGE PREHEATER/PRECALCINER

PYROPROCESSING UNIT TO REPLACE FOUR EXISTING LONG DRY

KILNS. ADDITIONAL PLANT-WIDE EMISSIONS,: LEAD:0.5 T/YR;

FLUORIDE:2.0 T/YR

Process Information : LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY

*PTocess Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER KILN *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 2214000.00

Throughput Unit: T/YR

Process Notes: THE PERMITS REQUIRE THE COMPANY TO CONDUCT STACK

EMISSIONS TESTS AND OPERATE CEMS FOR COMPLIANCE

DETERMINATION. THROUGHPUT IS CLINKER PRODUCT

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT coMpANy - CEMENT

MANUFACTURING, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER KILN

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

*Control Method Code: N

*CONtTOIMEthOd As-STAGEPREHEATERÆRECALCINERPYROPROCESSINGPLANT DESCTiPtiON: IS SELECTED FOR NOX EMISSION ABATEMENT. ANY ADD-ON NOX

EMISSIONS CONTROL HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EITHER

TECHNICALLY OR ENVI. INFEASIBLE

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 4871.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit l:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page99 of229

Dioxins & Furans

P

THE FLUE GAS TEMPERATURE (204 C)LIMITATION MEETS THE

MACT REQUIREMENT.

0.0110

NG/DSCF

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

P

SO2 EMISSION CONTROL OPTIONS INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION

OF A s-STAGE PREHEATER/PRECALCINER PYROPROCES SING

PLANT AND THE USE OF RAV/ MATERIAL V/HICH CONTAINS LESS

THAN O.O3% SULFUR

1041.0000

T/YR

+Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method Code: P

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1U25t2009
Format RBLC Report ' Page 100 of229

*Control Method THE BACT DETERMINED FOR CO IN THIS CASE IS PROCESS Description: MODIFICATION AND OPERATIONAL MONITORING. ANY ADD ON

CONTROL SUCH AS THERMAL OR CATALYTIC OXIDATION IS NOT

ENVIRONMENTALLY FEASIBLE. LIMIT IS FOR ANY ROLLING 12

MONTH PERIOD

EmissionLimit 1: 3328.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Namê Particulate malter,filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: B

*ContToI Method ENCLOSURE, WET SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS AND PAVED ROADS. Description: CONTROL EFFICIENCIES RANGE FROM 60-90%

Emission Limit l: 96.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

EmissionLimit 1Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 F (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method ALL STACKS ARE EQUIPPED WITH BAGHOUSE TO MEET EMISSION Description: LIMIT. KILN STACK 0.015 GR/SCFD; CLINKER COOLER STACK

0.0129 GR/SCFD; OTHER STACKS 0.01 GR/SCFD

Emission Limit 1: 620.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

Page 101 of229

Frocess Information : LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MATERIAL STORAGE AND TRANSFER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: LEHIGH PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY - MATERIAL STORAGE AND

TRANSFER

*Pollutant Name Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method ANY ADD oN VoC EMISSIONS CONTROLS HAVE BEEN Description: DETERMINED TO BE EITHER TECHNICALLY OR

ENVIRONMENTALLY INFEASIBLE.

Emission Limit 1: 165.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg. Time/Condition: :

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: tt/zs/zoog Contro] Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: HOLNAM, INC.

RBLC ID: Ml-0281 *Corporate/Company HOLNAM,INC.

Name:

*Facility Name: HOLNAM, INC.

Facility State: MI

Facility ZIP Code: 48131

Facility Contact Name: MICHELLE FERGUSON

Facility Contact Phone: 734-529-4415

Facility Contact Email :

Agency Name: MICHIGAN DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL eUALITY

Agency Contact: MS. DANITA BRANDT

http:llcþub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page 102 of229

Agency Phone: (517) 373-7034

Agency Email: BRANDTD@MICHIGAN.GOV

NAICS:

Permit Issuance Date: 0312012000 ACT

Date determination last 0311112002

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEW PROCESS TO EXISTING FACILITY

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

Facility Description: PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT.

Other Permitting EPA ID - MID 005038500; AIRS ID - MI 0036524; MI SRN: 81743. InfoTmation: ACTUAL START-UP DATE IS NOT AVAILABLE. CEMENT PLANT

. OPERATING SINCE 1960. SINCE APPROX.I99O, WET PROCESS

CEMENT PLANT HAS BEEN USING CARBON INJECTION FOR THE

CONTROL OF ORGANICS. PERMIT MOD 6O-7IL ALLOV/S FOR

CESSATION OF CARBON; BAGHOUSES FOLLOV/ED BY SLURRY

SCRUBBERS, THEN RTO. THIS POLLUTION CONTROL PROJECT IS

NOT SUBJECT TO PSD, AND NOT A MAJOR MODIFICATION. THIS

PERMIT SOURCE IS AUTHORIZED TO BURN TIRE CHIPS, UP TO

ABOUT 2I% OF HEAT INPUT, ON A PERMANENT BASIS. DURING

TRIAL BURNS, UNDER EARLIER PERMIT #60-711, STACK TESTS

WERE CONDUCTED AND BECAME A BASIS FOR MUCH OF

EMISSION LIMITS HEREIN.

Facility-wide Emissions : HOLNAM, INC.

xPollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 3515.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 3377.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 724.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 1 1940.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 7217.0000 (TonsiYear)

Increase:

Process Information : HOLNAM, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT KILNS, WET PROCESS (2)

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 100.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{ FEED

PTocess Notes: MOST COMPLIANCE WILL BE DEMONSTRATED BY CEMS.

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page 103 of229

AGENCY CAN INVOKE STACK TEST. CONVERSION TO PARTIAL

TDF IS EXPECTED TO HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON TOTAL PM

EMISSIONS, PER APRIL 1997 TEST BURN.

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, INC. - CEMENT KILNS, V/ET PROCESS (2)

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method SULFUR IN FUEL LIMIT HAS BEEN DROPPED IN FAVOR OF CEMS. Description: EXISTING LIMIT DOES NOT REFLECT ANTICIPATED 85%

REDUCTION IN SLURRY-SCRUBBER. CONTROL BY BAGHOUSE,

THEN SCRUBBER.

Emission Limit 1: 2L7000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/T

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

*Control Method Code: N

*ContToI Method CURRENT EXISTING LIMIT DOES NOT REFLECT POTENTIAL 30% Description: REMOVAL IN SLURRY-SCRUBBER. SOME GENERATION OF NO2 By

NATURAL GAS COMBUSTION IN RTOS.

Emission Limit 1: 6.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: . LB,IT

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: A /

*-ContToI Method FABRIC FILTER, SLURRY SCRUBBER, RTO. CURRENT EXISTING

DescTiption i LIMIT DOES NOT REFLECT ANTICIPATED 75% REDUCTION IN

SCRUBBER AND REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER.

Emission Limit 1: 6.4000

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/T

http:llcþvb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll2S12009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emisqion Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Page 104 of229

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

A

REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZERS, THREE IN PARALLEL PER

KILN. STANDBY ACTIVATED CARBON FOR BACKUP. CURRENT

EXISTING LIMITS DO NOT REFLECT ADDITIONAL 80% REMOVAL

ANTICIPATED IN RTOS.

13.0000

LBIT

Visible Emissions (VE)

A

FABRIC FILTER, SLURRY SCRUBBER

1s.0000

% OPACITY

Particulate Matter (PM)

A

FABRIC FILTER, SLURRY SCRUBBER, 15% OPACITY APPLIES.

ALTERNATE LrMrT rS rN LB/1000 LB GASES @ 6% 02. EXISTTNG

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 105 of229

LIMITS DO NOT REFLECT ADDITIONAL 90% ANTICIPATED PM

REMOVAL IN SCRUBBER.

Emission Liniit 1: 130.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

EmiSsion Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.1000

Emission Limit 2 Unit: LB/1000 LB @ 6% 02

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

. the BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: 1,1,/25/2009 Control- Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY

RBLC ID: KS-0020

*Corporate/Company

Name:

*Facility Name: ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY

Facility State: KS

Facility ZIP Code: 66720

Facility Contact Name:

Facility Contact Phone :

Facility Contact Email :

Agency Name: KANSAS DEPT. OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT, BR. OF AIR &

RADIATION, KS

Agency Contact: MR. RALPH V/ALDEN

Agency Phone: (785)296-1583

Agency Email: RWALDEN(EKDHE.STATE.KS.US

NAICS:

Permit Issuance Date: 0812611999 ACT

Datedeterminationlast 0611212001

updated:

Permit Type: A: NEV//GREENFIELD FACILITY

Facility Description:

Other Permitting

Information:

Process Information : ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT, PREHEATER/PRECALCINER KILN

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL

Throughput: 331.00

http:llcþlu;hepa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 106 of229

Throughput Unit: TI}J

Process Notes: A NEW PREHEATER/PRECALCINER CEMENT PLANT IS TO BE

CONSTRUCTED. PM EMISSIONS NETTED OUT; NOT SUBJECT TO

PSD

Pollutant Information: ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY - PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT,

PREHEATER/PRECALCINER KILN

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*ControlMethod COMPUTERISEDPROCESS/MONITORINGCONTROLEQUIPMENT

Description: WITH EMPLOYEE TRAINING TO IMPLEMENT GOOD COMBUSTION

PRACTICES.

Emission Limit 1: 5000.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1409.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report Date: tt/ZS/zOOg Control- Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE

RBLC ID: CO-0047

*Corporate/Company HOLNAM,FLORENCE

Name:

*Facility Name: HOLNAM, FLORENCE

Facility State: CO

Facility ZIP Code: 81266

Facility Contact Name: BOB MCGILVRAY

Facility Contact Phone: 719-784-6325

Facility Contact Email:

Agency Name: COLORADO DEPT OF HEALTH - AIR POLL CTRL

Agency Contact: JACKIE JOYCE

Agency Phone:

Agency Email: JACKIE.JOYCE@,STATE.CO.US

NAICS:

Permit Issuance Date: 0712911999 ACT

Date determination last .0310212004

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEW PROCESS TO EXISTING FACILITY

htfp:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report Page 107 of229

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

FACiIity DescTiption: PORTLAND CEMENT PLANT - MOD CHANGES WET PROCESS To

DRY PROCESS.

Other Permitting CLASS I AREA AFFECTED: GREAT SAND DLTNES - 45 MILES. ONLy lNfoTmation: DRAFT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND PSD PERMIT APPLICATION

WAS AVAILABLE FOR ENTRY IN RBLC. MODIFICATION PROPOSES

TO REPLACE ALL WET PROCESS KILNS WITH ONE DRY PROCESS

CEMENT KILN WITH A s-STAGE PREHEATERÆRECALCINER.

MODIFICATION RESULTED IN REDUCTION OF SO2, NOX AND PM.

BACT FOR CO ONLY. COLORADO AIR QUALITY COMMISSION.REG.

#6 REQUIRES BEST PRACTICAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGY FOR SO2

CONTROL. ESTIMATED START UP DATE HAS BEEN FURTHER

DELAYED. NO COMPLIANCE DATE SET.

Facility-wide Emissions : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Pollutant Name: Carbon Monoxide

Facility-wide Emissions 441 8.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Nitrogen Oxides OfOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 3204.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Particulate Matter (PM)

Facility-wide Emissions 299.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

*Pollutant Name: Sulfur Oxides (SOx)

Facility-wide Emissions 1074.0000 (Tons/year)

Increase: *PollutantName: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

Facility-wide Emissions 197.0000 (Tons/Year)

Increase:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: UNLOADING, TRANSFER, coNVEyING RAV/ MAT. & ADD. *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: LTNLOADING, TRANSFER, CONVEYING RAw MATERIALS &

ADDITIVES TO TRANSFER TOWER. AIRS ID 104

POIIUtANt INfoTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - LINLOADING, TRANSFER, CONVEYING RAw MAT. & ADD.

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < r0 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

tControl Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

http://cfpub .epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 Ill25/2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 0.1600

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Particulate Matter (PM)

A

BAGHOUSE

0.1700

T/YR

Page 108 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name:

*Process Type:

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

RAW MATEzuALS EXTRACTION

90.023

ArRS rD 101 (A)

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - RAV/ MATEzuALS EXTRACTION

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method Code:' P

*CONtTOI MEthOd MINIMIZE DISTANCE AREA, REVEGETATION, CHEMICAL Description: STABILIZERS

Emission Limit 1: 2.6300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Page 109 of229

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method MINIMIZE DISTANCE AREA, REVEGETATION, CHEMICAL Description: STABILIZERS

: 1.3200

Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg. ' Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: OVERBURDEN AND WASTE ROCK REMOVAL

*Process Type: 90.023

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 101C

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - OVERBURDEN AND WASTE ROCK REMOVAL

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method CONTROL PLAN

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 32.3700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

EmissionLimit 1Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

http:llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ITl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 F (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method CONTROL PLAN

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 16.7300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page ll0 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: RAW MATERIAL, REMOVAL AND HAULAGE

xProcess Type: 90.023

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 101D

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - RAW MATERIAL, REMOVAL AND HAULAGE

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method CONTROL PLAN

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 62.4700

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequçstTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method CONTROL PLAN

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 37.2700

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition: ' Did factors, other then air

.pollution technology

considerations influence

. the BACT decisions?:

Page lll of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: CEMENT KILN DUST HAULING

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 101E

Pollutant Information: HoLNAM, FLORENCE - CEMENT KILN DUST HAULING

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method WETTING MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.

Description:

Emission Limit l: 1.3400

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*control Method WETTING MATERIAL PRIOR To PLACEMENT.

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2.2300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2.Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 112of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: DISTURBED AREAS IN QUARRY AND PLANT

*Process Type: 90999

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCEss Notes: MINIMIZATION OF AREAS EXPOSED TO EROSION. AIRS ID 101 F

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - DISTURBED AREAS IN QUARRY AND PLANT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 167.2100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 83.6100

Emission Limit I Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 173 of229

-Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCess Name: MATERIAL TRANSFER, HAUL TRUCKS TO PRI CRUSH FEED

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTocess Notes: TRANSFER FROM HAUL TRUCK TO PRIMARY CRUSHER FEED

HOPPER. (2)TO BE CONSTRUCTED. AIRS rD 102

POIlutAnt InfoTmation; HOLNAM, FLORENCE - MATERIAL TR.ANSFER, HAUL TRUCKS TO PRI

CRUSH FEED

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: B

*COntToI Method ENCLOSURE UNDER NEG PRESSURE, DUST CURTAINS, WATER Description: SPRAY, BAGHOUSE

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg. transfer 1

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0200

Ernission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. transfer 2

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 F GPM10) *Control Method Code: B

*ContToI Method ENCLOSURE LINDER NEG PRESSURE, DUST CURTAINS, WATER Description: SPRAY, BAGHOUSE

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg. transfer 1

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0200

http.llcfpub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 II/2512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. transfer 2

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 114of229

Process Inforrnation : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: ROCK CRUSHER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 102 C

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - ROCK CRUSHER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

http://cfpub .epa'govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g i
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 115 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name:

*Process Type:

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

TRANSFER & CONVEYING, CRUSHER #1 TO SECOND #1

90.028

AIRS ID 102 D

POIIutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER & CONVEYING. CRUSHER #1 To

SECOND #1

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Particulate Matter (PM)

A

BAGHOUSE

0.0100

T/YR

Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

A

BAGHOUSE

0.0100

T/YR

http://cfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 116 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

+Process Name: SECONDARY CRUSHER #1

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 102 E

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - SECONDARY CRUSHER #l

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, hlterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: TiYR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: PzuMARY CRUSHER #2

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: TO BE CONSTRUCTED AIRS ID 102 F

Page 117 of229

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - PRIMARY CRUSHER #2

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.9100

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg,

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology'

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMlO) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.9100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: TRANSFER & coNVEyING, sECoNDARy CRUSHER #1 *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

http:llcfE:b.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeouF500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC'Report Page 118 of229

PTocess Notes: TRANSFER & CONVEYING SECONDARY CRUSHER #1 TO THE PREBLENDING HAUL. AIRS ID 102 G.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER & CONVEYING, SECONDARY

CRUSHER #1

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: TiYR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate mafter,filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology '

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCESS NAME: TRANSFER & CONVEYING, PRELIM CRUSH #2TO PRE-BLEND *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCCSS NOTES: TRANSFER & CONVEYING FROM PRELIMINARY CRUSHER #2 TO

PRE-BLENDING HALL. TO BE CONSTRUCTED. AIRS ID 102 H.

http://cfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25/2009
Format RBLC Report Page 119 of229

POIIutant InfoTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER & CONVEYING, PRELIM CRUSH #2

TO PRE-BLEND

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < l0 Lr (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2700

Emission Limit I Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: PRE-BLENDING

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTES: STACKER BELT, RECLAIMER, CONVEYORS, ALL ENCLOSED TO BE

CONSTRUCTED AIRS ID 102 K

http://cfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - PRE-BLENDING

Page 120 of229

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.2500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: RAw MATEzuALS CONVEYING, RAw MILL FEED BINS *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTES: RAW MATERIALS CONVEYING - RAV/ MILL FEED BINS TO

TRANSFER TOV/ER. TRANSFER ACROSS THE RIVER. AIRS ID 102 L.

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - RAW MATERIALS CONVEYING, RAw MILL

FEED BINS

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2200

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: TiYR

Emission Lirnit I Avg.

i_. lrme/Condrtron:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page l2I of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: UNLOADING & CONVEYING, COAL TO STOCKPILE

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 103 A. PM EMISSIONS NOT SUBJECT TO BACT ANALYSIS,

STANDARD EMISSON UNITS NOT AVAILABLE.

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TINLOADING & CONVEYING, COAL TO

STOCKPILE

*PollutantName Particulate matter,hlterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page 122 of229

*CONtToI Method NEG PRESSURE AND BAGHOUSE. STANDARD EMISSION UNITS Description: NOT AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit l: 1.8500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*CONtToI Method NEG PRESSURE AND BAGHOUSE. STANDARD EMISSION UNITS Description: NOT AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 1.9400

Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: COAL STOCKPILE

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - COAL STOCKPILE

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method SUR_FACE MOISTURE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.4500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/yR

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method SURFACE MOISTURE

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.3300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, othei then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 123 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCEss Name: RECLAIMING, CONVEYING, & TRANS COAL TO COAL SCREEN

*Process Tlpe: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTocess Notes: AIRS ID 103 C. PERMIT MODIFICATION TzuGGERED BACT REVIEW

OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION TINITS NOT

AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - RECLAIMING, CONVEYING, & TRANS COAL

TO COAL SCREEN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*ContTol Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW DESCTiption: OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS NoT

AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit 1: 0.1900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 124 of229

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*ContTol Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW Description: OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION TINITS NOT

AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit 1: 0.1900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: SCREENING AND CRUSHING OVERSIZE COAL

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTocess Notes: PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW OF Co ONLY.

PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS NOT AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANI INfOTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - SCREENING AND CRUSHING OVERSIZE C)AL

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*COntToI Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW DESCTiPtiON: OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION LINITS NOT

AVAILABLE,

Emission Limit 1: 0.1900

Emission Limit 1 Urrit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 125 of229

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*ContToI Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT MODIFICATION TzuGGERED BACT REVIEw DEscTiption: OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS.IN STANDARD EMISSION LINITS NoT

AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit 1: 0.1900

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2

Emission Limit 2IJnit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCESS NAME: TRANS & CONVEYING - CRUSHED COAL TO TRANSFER TOWER *Process Type: 90.01I

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOtESi AIRS ID 103 E. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW

OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION I-INITS NOT

AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANt INfOrmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANS & CONVEYING - CRUSHED COAL To

TRANSFER TOWER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*CONtTOI MEthOd BAGHOUSE. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW DESCTiPtiON: OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS NOT

AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

Emission Limit I Unit: T/yR

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 126 of229

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 Lr (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*ContToI Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW Description: OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS NOT

AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: TRANSFER, COAL, TRANSFER TOV/ER TO SILO

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTocess Notes: AIRS ID 105. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW

OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION LTNITS NOT

AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER, COAL, TRANSFER TOWER To SILO

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*COntToI Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW DescTiption: OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION UNITS NoT

AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR.

http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 127 of229

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE. PERMIT MODIFICATION TRIGGERED BACT REVIEW DescTiption: OF CO ONLY. PM LIMITS IN STANDARD EMISSION TINITS NOT

AVAILABLE..

Emission Limit l: 0.0200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: TRANSFER & CONVEYING, RAW MATERIAL

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTocess Notes: AIRS ID 106. TRANSFER OF RAW MATERIAL FROM TRANSFER

TOWER TO RAW MILL.

POIlutAnt InfoTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER & CONVEYING, RAW MATERIAL

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

. pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FPMI0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Timê/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 128 of229

: 0.2200

Unit: T/YR

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: COAL MILL VENT BAGHOUSE

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTES: HOT GASES FROM PRECALCINER VENTS THROUGH COAL

GRINDER FOR DRYING. AIRS ID 107. PM EMISSIONS NOT SUBJECT

TO BACT ANALYSIS, STANDARD EMISSON T]NITS NOT

AVAILABLE.

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - coAL MILL VENT BAGHousE

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 358.9000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Page 129 of229

Particulate Matter (PM)

A

BAGHOUSE. PM EMISSIONS NOT SUBJECT TO BACT ANALYSIS,

STANDARD EMISSON UNITS NOT AVAILABLE.

t4.4000

T/YR

Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FPM10)

A

BAGHOUSE. PM EMISSIONS NOT SUBJECT TO BACT ANALYSIS,

STANDARD EMISSON UNITS NOT AVAILABLE.

14.4400

T/YR

Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox)

P

LOW NOX BURNER

263.0000

TIY

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 tU25t2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Page 130 of229

Sultur Dioxide (SO2)

N

OVERALL FACILITY SO2 CONTROL ABOVE 80% SATISFIES BEST

PRACTICAL CONTROL REQUIREMENT.

448.6000

T/YR

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

P

GOOD COMBUSTION

16.2000

Emission Limit T/YR

Emission Limit

Unit:

Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name:

*Process Type:

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

RAW MILL SYSTEM

90.028

AIRS ID 108

http:l/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009
Format RBLC Report Page 131 of229

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - RAV/ MILL SYSTEM

tPollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 6.1700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 6.1700

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: TRANSFER, MILLED RAw MEAL To BLENDING sILo *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 109

Psllutant Information: HoLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER, MILLED RAw MEAL To

BLENDING SILO

http:l/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 IIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 3.8600

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considelations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 3.8600

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 732 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: TRANSFER, BLENDING sILo ro KILN FEED BIN

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 110

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER, BLENDING SILO To KILN FEED

BIN

*Pollutant Name ' Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 1.5400

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 1.5400

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 133 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*PTOCESS NAME: KILN/PREHEATER/BYPASS & CLINKER COOLER EXHAUST *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTCS: OTHER FUELS: TDF AND NATURAL GAS. LIMITS TAKEN FROM

DRAFT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. AIRS ID 11I. PM EMISSIONS NOT

SUBJECT TO BACT ANALYSIS, STANDARD EMISSON IINITS NOT

AVAILABLE.

POIIUtANt INfOTmation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - KILN/PREHEATER/BYPASS & CLINKER

COOLER EXHAUST

*Pollutant Name Total Suspended Particulates *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOLISE

htÍp.llcfpttb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 132.1000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: TÆR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

1 32.1 000

T/YR

Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

A

BAGHOUSE

Page 734 of229

Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox)

P

LOW NOX COMBUSTION SYSTEM

2922.7t00

T/YR

Carbon Monoxide

P

GOOD COMBUSTION

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then.air

pollution teclùology

considerations infl uence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

'Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit

F.mission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 135 of229

3988.7000

T/YR

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

A

WET LIME SCRUBBER

623.2300

T/YR

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

P

GOOD COMBUSTION

180.5000

TiYR

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 136 of229

*Process Name: CEMENT CLINKER COOLER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS lD ll2. PM EMISSIONS NOT SUBJECT TO BACT ANALYSIS,

STANDARD EMISSON LINITS NOT AVAILABLE.

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - CEMENT CLINKER COOLER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*ContToI Method BAGHOUSE. PM EMISSIONS NOT SUBJECT TO BACT ANALYSIS Description: STANDARD EMISSON LINITS NOT AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit l: 60.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*CONtTOI Method BAGHOUSE. PM EMISSIONS NOT SUBJECT TO BACT ANALYSIS Description: STANDARD EMISSON UNITS NOT AVAILABLE.

Emission Limit 1: 60.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: CEMENT CLINKER STORAGE & HANDLING

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary'Fuel:

http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll2Sl200g
Format RBLC Report

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 113

Page 137 of229

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - CEMENT CLINKER STORAGE & HANDLING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.0700

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: TRANSFER, CLINKER TO CEMENT FINISH MILL BINS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID Ll4

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page 138 of229

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER, CLINKER TO CEMENT FINISH

MILL BINS

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

þollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

' Process Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE

+Process Name: FINISH MILL SYSTE

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: MILL #1 - AIRS ID 1 15 A. MILL #2 - AIRS ID 1 15 B. MILL #3 - AIRS ID

115 C: TO BE CONSTRUCTED

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - FINISH MILL SYSTEM

http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 70.7800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 70.7800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology '

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 139 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: TRANSFER, CEMENT TO CEMENT SILOS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 116

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - TRANSFER, CEMENT TO CEMENT SILOS

*PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 2.5500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, hlterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2.5400

Emission Limit I Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 140 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: MATERIAL HANDLING, CEMENT PACKHOUSE

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID ll7

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - MATERIAL HANDLING, CEMENT PACKHOUSE

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 141 of229

Pârticulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

A

BAGHOUSE

0. I 300

T/YR

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name:

*Process Type:

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

MATERIAL HANDLING; CEMENT BULK LOADOUTS

90.028

AIRS ID 1 18

Pollutant Information: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - MATERIAL HANDLING, CEMENT BULK

LOADOUTS

*PollutantName

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit l:

Particulate Matter (PM)

A

BAGHOUSE

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit2

Emission Limit2

2.5800

Unit: T/YR

Avg.

Unit:

Arrg.

http:lbfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMIO) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2.4600

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 142 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: PAVED ROADS, CEMENT PRODUCT HAULOUT *Process Type: 99.140

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 119

POIIUtANt INfO[mation: HOLNAM, FLORENCE - PAVED ROADS, CEMENT PRODUCT HAULOUT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method CONTROL PLAN

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 1.6000

Emission Limit I Unit: T/yR

, Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1 Il25l200g
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 Lr (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method CONTROL PLAN

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 1.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 143 of229

Process Information : HOLNAM, FLORENCE

*Process Name: DRILLING AND BLASTING

*Process Type: 90,023

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: AIRS ID 1018

Pollutant Information: HoLNAM, FLORENCE - DRILLING AND BLASTING

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 70.6000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox) *Control Method Code: N

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25/2009
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

EmissionLimit 1:

Page 144 of229

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

17.9000

T/YR

Particulate Matter (PM)

N

1.3500

TÆR

Particulate matter, filterable < 10 Lr (FPM10)

A

0.7000

T/YR

Unit:

Avg.

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Report Date: tt/zs/zoog

Page 145 of229

Control- Technology Determinations (Freeform)

Facility Information: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

RBLC ID: IN-0081 *Corporate/Company LONESTARINDUSTRIES,INC.

Name:

*Facility Name: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

Facility State: IN

Facility ZIP Code: 46135

Facility Contact Name:

Facility Contact Phone:

Facility Contact Email:

Agency Name: INDIANA DEPT OF ENV MGMT, OFC OF AIR

Agency Contact: MR. MACK SIMS

Agency Phone: (317)233-0567

Agency Email: NAICS: 327310

Permit Issuance Date: 0411611999 ACT

Date determinationlast 0311012004

updated:

Permit Type: B: ADD NEV/ PROCESS To EXISTING FACILITY

C: MODIFY EXISTING PROCESS AT EXISTING FACILITY

Facility Description:

Other Permitting THIS PERMIT SUPERCEDES PREVIOUS pSD APpROVALS (Cp-133- ' Information: 5836). THE PROPOSED PROJECT FOR Cp-133-5886 wAS NBVBR

CONSTRUCTED. THE COMPANY IS MODIFYING THE EXISTING

DRY PROCESS KILN (2600 TONS CLINKER/DAY TO A SEMI-DRY pRocESS KrLN (4400 TONS CLINKER/DAY). THrS SOURCE

MODIFICATION FOR LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC., RELATES TO

THE MODIFICATION OF THE WET PROCESS CEMENT KILN u¡ITH A

CLINKER PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF 2600 TONS PER DAY TO A

SEMI-DRY PROCESS CEMENT KILN WITH A CLINKER

PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF 44OO TONS PER DAY AND ITS

ASSOCIATED OPERATIONS.

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, COAL MILL *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 40.00

Throughput Unit: T/YR

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IN TONS oF coAL pER HouR, ALSO 313,550

TONS/YR, EMISSION POINT FF 2-11

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MANUFACTURING, COAL MILL

http:/lcþub'epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25/2009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit I Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name

*Control Method Code:

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1:

Emission Limit 1 Unit:

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 146 of229

Visible Emissions (VE)

A

FABzuC FILTER

10.0000

% OPACITY

Particulate maiíeÍ, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

A

FABRIC FILTER

0.0100

GRiDSCF

4.4500

LB/H

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES,INC.

*Process Name:

*Process Type:

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

CEMENT MANUFACTURING, KILN OPERATION

90.028

COAL

360.00

TIfI

oNE HAMMERMILL DRYER, ONE CALCINER TOV/ER (451

MMBTU/HR), AND SEMr-DRY PROCESS KrLN (376 MMBTU/HR) AND

BYPASS SYSTEM. THROUGHPUT IN TONS RAW FEED PER HOUR,

ALSO 183 TONS CLINKER/HR SO2, NOX, AND CO EMISSIONS

DECREASE AS A RESULT OF THIS MODIFICATION FROM A WET

KILN TO A SEMI-DRY KILN.

POIIUtANt INfoTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MANUFACTURING, KILN

htlp:/lcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

OPERATION

Page747 of229

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method ESP

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 20.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LBiT

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method ESP

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0140

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 88.7000

Emission Limit 2Unt: LBÆ{

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable (FpM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method ESP

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0160

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 91.3000

Emission Limit 2Untt: LB/II

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, bther then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report Page 148 of229

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 3317.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: TiYR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/MMBTU

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Póllutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) *Control Method Code: P

*CONtTOI MEthOd LOV/NOX CALCINER, GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 4428.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 5.4700

Emission Limit 2Unit: LBÆ

Emission Limit 2 Avg. clinker

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2930.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 3.6500 ,

Emission Limit 2Unit: LBÆ

Emission Limit 2 Avg. clinker

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

-considerations influence

hup://cfpub.epa'gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

Page 149 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES,INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., ALKALI BYPASS DUST TRANSFER EQUIP

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: EMISSION POINTS BE 3-6, BE 3-8.

POIIutant InfoTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., ALKALI BYPASS DUST

TRANSFER EQUIP

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: P

.*Control Method BUILDING ENCLOSURE

Description: '

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., ALKALI BYPASS DUST BINS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: EMISSION POINT FF 3-7

POIIutAnt InfoTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., ALKALI BYPASS DUST

BINS

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.6400

Emission Limit 2Unit: LBÆ{

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air '

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 150 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., CLINKER COOLER *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 183.00

Throughput Unit: TIII

PTOCESS NOTES: THROUGHPUT IN TONS CLINKER PER HOUR. EMISSION POINT FF

3-e (srACK3-2).

POIIUtANt INfoTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., CLINKER CooLER

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate mafter,filterable < 10 p (FPMI0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 7.2500

Emission Limit 2Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 151 of229

Pt'ocess Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., CLINKER CooLER TRANSFER EeUIPMENT *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 183.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

PTOCESS NOTCS: THROUGHPUT IN TONS CLINKER PER HOUR. EMISSION POINTS FF

3- 11, FF 3-12.

POIIutAnt InfoTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., CLINKER CooLER

TRANSFER EQUIPMENT

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.1200

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg. TOTAL OF FF3-11 AND FF3-12

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 152 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., CLINKER STORAGE SILOS *Process Type: 90.028

Piimary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: EMISSION POINT FF 3-14.

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., CLINKER STORAGE

SILOS

*PollutantName Particulate matler, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.5900

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emissiontimit2Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE, ALT EMISSION LIMIT LB/TON FEED (DRy)

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LBIT

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 153 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., FINISH MILL, NO. 3

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 95.00

Throughput Unit: TIIJ

Process Notes: Nol AND NO2 FINUSH MILLS ARE EXISTING FACILITIES AND ARE

NOT BEING MODIFIED AS A RESULT OF THIS MODIFICATION.

THROUGH PUT IS TONS CLINKER PER HOUR. NO.3 FINISH MILL

EMISSION POINTS: FF4-9.

POIIUtANt INfOTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., FINISH MILL, No. 3

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.9700

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method ENCLOSURES ANDioR WATER MIST SUPPRESSION

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY .Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 154 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

+Process Name: CEMENT MFG., FINISH MILL TRANSFER EeUIPMENT *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 235.00.

Throughput Unit: TPH

PTOCESS NOTES: THROUGHPUT IS TONS CLINKER PER HOUR. EMISSION POINTS FF

4- g, FF 3-19, FF 3-20, FF 4-10, FF 4-ll,FF 4-12.

Pollutant Information: LoNE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., FINISH MILL

TRANSFER EQUIPMENT

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg. EMISSION POINTS FF4-8 AND FF3-19

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unít: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 2 Avg. FF3-20, FF4-10, FF4-1l,FF4-12

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other therr air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 155 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., CEMENT STORAGE SILOS

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 235.00

Throughput lJnit: TIH

PTOCESS NOTES: THROUGHPUT IN TONS CEMENT PER HOUR. SILOS COMPRISE OF

FOUR GROUPS. GROUP 2 SILOS (1-11) WITH STORAGE CAPACITY

OF 24842 TONS, GROUP 3 SILOS (T-12) WITH STORAGE CAPACITY

oF 29763 TONS, cROUp 4 SILOS (701A-704A) V/rTH STORAGE

CAPACITY OF 18892 TONS, AND GROUP 5 SIOS (705A-7IOA) WITH

STORAGE CAPACITY OF 60462 TONS.

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., CEMENT STORAGE

SILOS

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*control Method FABRIC FILTER. PMlO : TorAL FILTERABLE pM

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emisgion Limit 1 Avg. GROUP 5 SLOS

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0200

Emission Limit 2Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 2 Avg. GROUP 2,3,4 SILOS

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 156 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURE, PRIMARY CRUSHER

*Process Type: 90.024

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 1300.00

Throughput Unit: TIH

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS TONS LIMESTONE PER HOUR. ADDITIONAL

LIMIT 2,262,500 TONS/YR. EMISSION POINT 1-8. COMPLIANCENOT

VERIFIED AS OF 717199

Pollutant Information: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MANUFACTURE, PRIMARY

CRUSHER

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method WATER SPRAY SUPPRESSION

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 15.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit'1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., RAV/ MATERIAL SIZING TRANSFER EQUIP

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: EMISSION POINTS 1-9 AND 1-11. VE limit only for this process.

Pollutant Information: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., RAW MATEzuAL

SIZING TRANSFER EQUIP

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

http:i/cfpub .epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method WATER MIST SUPPRESSION

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1-Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Pagel5T of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, SECONDARY CRUSHER

*Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 400.00

Throughput Unit: T/H

PTOCess Notes: THROUGHPUT IS T LIMESTONEiH ALSO LIMITED TO 2,705,800

T/YR, EMISSION POINT FF 1-15

Pollutant Information: LONE STAR INDUSTzuES, INC. - CEMENT MANUFACTURING,

SECONDARY CRUSHER

*PollutantName Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 7.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.1200

Emission Limit 2Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE. PM10 : TOTAL FILTERABLE pM

Description:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill.istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.6000

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 158 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES,INC.

*PTOCEss Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, BALL MILL TRANSFER EQUIPMENT

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 360.00

Throughput Unit: TÆ{

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT TONS RAW MATEzuAL PER HOUR, ALSO LIMITED

TO 2,705,800 TONS/YR. EMISSION POINTS 1-9 AND FF 1-11.

Pollutant Information: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MANUFACTURING, BALL

MILL TRANSFER EQUIPMENT

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2 Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 F GPM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE. PM10: TOTAL FILTERABLE PM

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: GR/DSCF

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 1.0800

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 159 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MANUFACTURING, FLY ASH SILOS

*Process Type: 99.120

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 135300.00

Throughput Unit: T/YR

PTOCCss Notes: THROUGHPUT IN TONS FLY ASH PER YEAR, EMISSION POINT FF 1-

2t.

Pollutant Information: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MANUFACTURING, FLY ASH

SILOS

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unít:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Conditiorr:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matteÍ,hlterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE. PM10 : TOTAL FILTERABLE PM

Description:

EmisSionLimit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2: 0.2200

Emission Limit 2Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 160 of229

Process Information : LONE STAR INDUSTRIES,INC.

*Process Name: CEMENT MFG., FINISH MILL TRANSFER, NO.3

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTocess Notes: NO.l AND NO.2 FINISH MILLS ARE EXISTING FACILITIES AND ARE

NOT BEING MODIFIED AS A RESULT OF THIS MODIFICATION.

THROUGHPUT IS TONS CLINKER PER HOUR. NO.3 FINISH MILL

TRANSFER EMISSION POINTS: FF4-8, FF3-19, FF3-20, FF4-10, FF4-11,

FF4-T2.

Pollutant Information: LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. - CEMENT MFG., FINISH MILL

TRANSFER, NO.3

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0150

Emission Limit 1 Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 1 Avg. FF4-8, FF3-19

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: GR/DSCF

Emission Limit 2 Avg. FF3-20, FF4-10, FF4-1l,FF4-12

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

. considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method FABRIC FILTER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 161 of229

NOTE: Draft determinations are marked with a " * " beside the RBLC ID.

Report DaLe: tl-/ZS/ZOO9 Contro1 Technology Determinat.ions (Freeform)

Facility Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

RBLC ID: TX-0279

*Corporate/Company NORTIITEXASCEMENTCOMPANY

Name:

*Facility Name: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

Facility State: TX

Facility ZIP Code: 760650520

Facility Contact Name: RONNIE T. BEALL

Facility Contact Phone:

Facility Contact Email:

Agency Name: TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ)

Agency Contact: RANDY HAMILT

Agency Phone: (512) 239-1512

Agency Email: RHAMILTO@TCEQ.STATE.TX.US

NAICS: 327310

Permit Issuance Date: 0310411999 ACT

Datedeterminationlast 0110412005

updated:

Permit Type: A: NEV/iGREENFIELD FACILITY

Facility Description: PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NE\M PORTLAND CEMENT

MANUFACTURING FACILITY DESIGNED TO PRODUCE 31OO TONS

OF CLINKER PER DAY. THE FACILITY IS A MAJOR SOURCE FOR

PMIO, NOX, CO, SO2, AND VOC.

Other Permitting

lnformation:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

tProcess Name: SHIFTABLE QUARRY BELT DROP POINT

*Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTocess Notes: MINING OPERATIONS LIMITED TO 16 HR/DAY. FUGITIVE

EMISSIONS.

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lllZ5l2009
Format RBLC Report Page 162 of229

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT coMPANy - SHIFTABLE QUARRY BELT DROP POINT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: P

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND spRAyING.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2900

Emission Limit I Unit: LBÆ{

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8600

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiyR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations infl uence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMlO) *Control Method Code: P

*control Method PATIAL ENCLOSURE AND spRAyING.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: p

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLosuRE AND spRAyING.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC Report

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 163 of229

. Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: QUARRY BELT DROP POINT (FUTURE) *Process Typê: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTES: MINING OPERATIONS LIMITED TO 16 HR/DAY. FUGITIVE

EMISSIONS.

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT coMpANy - QUARRY BELT DROP POINT (FUTURE)

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED AND SPRAYED

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.2900

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.g600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED AND SPRAYED

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.g600

EmissionLimit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

http:/lcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25/2009
Format RBLC Report

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED AND SPRAYED

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 164 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS NAME: QUARRY CONVEYOR BELT TO LIMESTONE STORAGE DROP PT. *Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTES: MINING OPERATIONS LIMITED TO 16 HR/DAY. FUGITIVE

EMISSIONS.

Pcillutant Information: NoRTH TEXAS CEMENT coMpANy - QUARRY CONVEYOR BELT TO LIMESTONE STORAGE DROP PT.

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED AND SPRAYED

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB,IH

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http:llcfpub'epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Il/2512009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method SPRAYED AND COVERED

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.2900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB,IH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED AND SPRAYED

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2IJnit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 165 o1229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MOBILE CRUSHER

*Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTES: NOT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN 492 FEET OF RESIDENTIAL

PROPERTY LINE. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS.

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT coMpANy - MOBILE CRUSHER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: N

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBIC Report

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.6500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.9000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.6500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.9000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 166 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

hnp://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page 167 of229

*Process Name: RAV/ MATEzuAL HOppER *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANI INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - RAW MATEzuAL HOPPER

tPollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8000

Emission Limit 2Untt T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations infl uence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAÇHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆI

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

http:llcþub.epa.govhblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 168 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: RAW MATERIAL STORAGE BINS *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACKS I 8.2

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - RAV/ MATEzuAL STORAGE BINS

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.6900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit I Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.9600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description: ' Emission Limit 1: 0.6800

Emission Limit I Unit: LBiH

Emission Limit 1 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.9600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lI/2512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

xControl Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 169 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: RAW MATERIAL FEED BIN *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - RAW MATERIAL FEED BIN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.2500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆ{

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.1100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

EmissionLimit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC Report

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:.

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < l0 Fr (FpMlO)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2500

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.1100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 170 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: RAW MATERIAL CONVEYOR TRANSFER

*'Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - RAV/ MATERIAL CONVEYOR

TRANSFER

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.3900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆ{

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: L7200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.3900

Emission Limit I Unit: LB

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: L7200

Emission Limit 2Unit: TIY

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

' *Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page I7l of229

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC Report Page lV2 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MAIN KILN/SCRUBBER STACK

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel: COAL Throughput: 3100.00

Throughput Unit: T/D CLINKER

Process Notes: ADDITIONAL FUEL: PETROLEUM coKE. A LIMIT oN THE

POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN THE PETROLEUM

COKE OF < lo/o V/T CONC.

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MAIN KILN/SCRUBBER STACK

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method SCRUBBER AND BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 28.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. FRONT-HALF, FED COMPLIANCE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 123.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. FRONT-HALF, FED COMPLIANCE

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method SCRUBBER AND BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 28.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. FRONT-HALF, FED COMPLIANCE

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 123.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. FRONT-HALF, FED COMPLIANCE

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Nitrogen Oxides (Ì.{Ox)

*Control Method Code: B

http://cfpub .epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 1112512009
Format RBLC Report Page 173 of229

*CONtTol Method SEPARATE LINE DOWNDRAFT LOVI-NOX CALCINER AND LOW- Description: NOX IN-LINE CALCINER.

Emission Limit 1: 1085.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1585.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method SCRUBBER AND BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2840.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1577.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Carbon Monoxide

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2209.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 3225.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) *Control Method Code: P

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl2Sl200g
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method GOOD COMBUSTION PRACTICES.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 686.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:'

Emission Limit2: 1008.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Sulfuric Acid (mist, vapors, etc)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method SCRUBBER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 190.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 187.0000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/.YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTF AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 774 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

http://cþub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page 175 of229

*Process Name: BLENDING SILO DEDUSTING

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - BLENDING SILO DEDUSTING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 02200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBiH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matrer, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit l: 0.2200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBiH

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

http,,llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 176 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: FEED BIN

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - FEED BIN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 0.2000

Unit: LBIH

Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8600

Emission Limit 2IJnit: T/YR

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?: .

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 177 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*ProcesS Name: PREHEATER FEED

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT CoMpANy - PREHEATER FEED

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8900

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l}00g
Format RBLC Report

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate malter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBI}I

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8900

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 178 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: BLENDING SILO

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: MA.IN BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT CoMpANy - BLENDING SILO

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 0.0600

Unit: LBIII

Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.2800

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

r the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 F GpMl0)

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0600

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.2800

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 179 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CLINKER CONVEYOR NO. 1

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CLINKER CONVEYOR NO. 1

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.5100

http://cþub..epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 11125/2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.2200

Emission Limit 2Unir: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.5100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 2.2200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Descriptioni

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 180 o1229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

+Process Name: CLINKER CONVEYOR NO. 2

*Process Type: 90.028

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblciReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Page 181 of229

POIIUtANt Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CLINKER CONVEYOR No. 2

' *Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method BAGHOUSE AND COVERED CONVEYOR

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2.1500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 9.4200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: B

*control Method BAGHOUSE AND covERED coNVEyoR

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 2.1500

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 9.4200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: B

*control Method BAGHOUSE AND covERED coNVEyoR

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE Time/Condition: ,

Emission Limit2:

http://cfpub.epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields,cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 182 of229

Process Information :NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

+Process Name: CLINKER CONVEYOR AND BIN

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CLINKER CONVEYOR AND BIN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.6700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.9rc0

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiYR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 F (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.6700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆ{

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 29100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

http://cþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 183 o1229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

tProcess Name: BYPASS DUST BIN *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: NoRTH TEXAS CEMENT coMpANy - BypASS DUST BIN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2200

Emission Limit I Unit: LBiH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9600

Emission Limit 2rJnit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http.llcfpub.epa.govhblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:5gg Ill25/2009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 184 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: RAW MILL DUST BIN

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - RAw MILL DUST BIN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

hftp:ll,cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

EmissionLimit 1: 0.2200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆI

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9600

Emission Limit ZUnit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

EmissionLimit l: 02200

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 10.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 185 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: SCRUBBER AREA

http:llcfpub.epa.govhblclReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE

Page 186 of229

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - SCRUBBER AREA

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0900

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.0900

Emission Limit I Unit: LBiH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 187 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: RAW COAL/COKE BIN

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - RAW COAL/COKE BIN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method BAGHOUSE & SPRAY COAL/COKE PILES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0800

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method BAGHOUSE & SPRAY COAL/COKE PILES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: B

*Control Method BAGHOUSE AND SPRAY COAL/COKE PILES.

Description:

Emission Limit l: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 188 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MAT STORAGE, CRUSHED COALiCOKE BIN

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MAT STORAGE, CRUSHED

COALiCOKE BIN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE AND SpRAy PILE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0300

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

http:/icfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE AND SPRAY THE PILE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0300

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiyR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 189 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

'*Process Name: MATEzuAL HANDLING sysrEM INTO FINISH MILL *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEM

INTO FINISH MILL

*PollutantName Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.9200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiConditión:

Emission Limit2: 4.0500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10)

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009
Format RBLC Report

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.9200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2: 4.0500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence'

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 190 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CLINKER LOADOUT

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput: I 13 1500.00

Throughput Unit: T/YR

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CLINKER LOADOUT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1800

http:llcþub.epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8000

Eàission Limit 2lJnit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 191 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: FINISH MILL SYSTEM VENT

*Process Type: 90.028

http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

, Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Page 192 of229

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - FINISH MILL SYSTEM VENT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 9.8300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB,IH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2: 43.1000

Emission Limit 2Unít: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 9.8300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 43.1000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

xControl Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE .

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 I1l25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 193 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*ProcessName: CEMENT SILONO.l

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: NoRTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CEMENT SILO NO.1

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1000

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.10.00

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit I Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 194 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CEMENT SILO NO. 2

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

Pollutant Information: NoRTH TEXAS CEMENT CoMpANy - CEMENT SILO No. 2

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.3400

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.5000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U'

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll/2512009
Format RBLC Report

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.3400

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 1.5000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTES AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 195 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CEMENT SILO NO. 3

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACK

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON:NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CEMENT SILO NO. 3

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25/2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 0.1100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB,IH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1 : 0.1 100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Urut:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 196 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

' *Process Name: CEMENT LOADOUT NO. I AND NO. 2

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACKS

Pagel9T of229

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CEMENT LOADOUT NO. I AND

NO. 2

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

. 

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.3300

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.4400

Emission Limit 2Unt: TiYR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,f,rlterable < l0 p (FPMIO)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.3300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.4400

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit 1 Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDeÏailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 198 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CEMENT SILO FEED BIN #S. 1,2,3,4

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: BAGHOUSE STACKS

POIIUtANt Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CEMENT SILO FEED BIN #S. 1. 2.

3,4

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1400

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.6200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < l0 pr (FpM10) *Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.1400

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.6200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaill,istingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2 Avg. EACH

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Visible Emissions (VE)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method BAGHOUSE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 5.0000

Emission Limit I Unit: % OPACITY

Emission Limit 1 Avg. 6 MINUTE AVERAGE

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2:

Emission Limit 2Unit:

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 199 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: FRONT END LOADER DROP POINT TO CRUSHER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - FRONT END LOADER DROp

POINT TO CRUSHER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE V/ITH WATER SPRAYER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.5700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg,

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.6400

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterabre < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: P

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE WITH WATER spRAyER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2700

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.7800

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page200 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CRUSHER DRop poINT To coNVEyoR BELT *Process Type: 90.028

Frimary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CRUSHER DROP POINT TO CONVEYOR BELT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: p

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE WITH WATER spRAyER

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.5700

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIIJ.

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: L6400

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

hup:llcfEtb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate.matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10) *Contiol Method Code: P

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE WITH WATER spRAyER

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2700

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 0.7800

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page20I of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: LIMESTONE STORAGE BUILDING VENT

*Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - LIMESTONE STORAGE

BUILDING VENT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method FULLY ENCLOSED BUILDING FoR LIME STORAGE

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1000

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.4200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter,, filterable < l0 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: P

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page202 of229

*Control Method FULLY ENCLOSED BUILDING FOR LIME STORAGE

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0500

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.2100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: SANDiI\4ILL SCALE DROP POINT TO HOppER

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes:

Pollutant InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - SAND/I\4ILL SCALE DROP POINT

TO HOPPER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND V/ATER SpRAy

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 0.1900

Unit: LB/H

Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER spRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0900

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ITl25/2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3900

Emission Limit 2Unit T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page203 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOcess Name: MATEzuAL HANDLING, ADDITIVE DROP POINT TO HOPPER *Procgss Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtAnt InfoTmation:NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATEzuAL HANDLING,

ADDITIVE DROP POINT TO HOPPER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER SpRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.5300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.3100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: B

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER spRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2500

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcþub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2: 1.0900

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiYR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page204 o1229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

+Process Name: CLINKER TRUCK LOADING

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE.

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CLINKER TRUCK LOADING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.5300

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.3100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0700

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiYR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page205 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MAT HANDLING, COAL/COKE DRop pT To HoppER (MTOg) *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy

POlIUtAnt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MAT HANDLING, COAL/COKE

DROP PT TO HOPPER (MT08)

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: P

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER spRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBiH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2 0.8200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER spRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3900

Emission Limit 2rJnit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

httpillcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC Report

the BACT decisions?:

Page206 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS NAME: MATERIAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE DROP POINT TO STACKER *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy.

POIIUtANt lNfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATERIAL HANDLING,

COAL/COKE DROP POINT TO STACKER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER spRAy.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.4700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.0500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER spRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2200

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9700

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http://cfpub.epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

Page207 of229

+PTocess Name: MATERIAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE DROP POINT TO PILE

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY.

POIIutant InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATERIAL HANDLING,

COAL/COKE DROP POINT TO PILE

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.4700

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.0500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER SpRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 02200

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9700

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MATERIAL HANDLING, COAL/COKE DRop To HoppER (MT05)

http:l/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY

Page 208 of229

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATERIAL HANDLING,

coAL/coKE DROP TO HOPPER (MT0s)

*PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND V/ATER SPRAY

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.4700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.0500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER SpRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9700

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCEsS Name: MATERIAL HANDLING COAL/COKE DROP FEEDER To BELT *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

http:i/cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Il/2512009
Format RBLC Report

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

Page209 of229

Pollutant Information:NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATEzuAL HANDLING

COAL/COKE DROP FEEDER TO BELT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/FI

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8200

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < l0 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0900

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3900

Emission Limit 2 Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MATEzuAL HANDLING COAL/COKE DRop BELT To BELT *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy.

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report Page2t} of229

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATEzuAL HANDLING

COAL/COKE DROP BELT TO BELT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELTS

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1900

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.8200

Emission Limit 2Unít: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: P

.*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELTS

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3900

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

: 0.0900

Unit: LB/H

Avg.

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTocess Name: MAT HANDLING, COAL/COKE RECEIVING DROP TO HOPPER *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MAT HANDLING, COAL/COKE

RECEIVING DROP TO HOPPER

http.,/lcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND V/ATER SPRAY.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

EmissionLimit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY.

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0400

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.1500

Emission Limit 2Unít: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2ll of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: QUARRY CONVEYOR BELT To LIMESTONE STORAGE

xProcess Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - QUARRY CONVEYOR BELT TO

LIMESTONE STORAGE

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 Ill25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0200

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiYR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factcirs, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2I2 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: QUARRY BELT (SHIFTABLE)

*Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - QUARRY BELT (SHIFTABLE)

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1300

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l20)g
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3900

Emission Limit 2Unít: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPMI0)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0700

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIII

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.1900

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2l3 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: QUARRY BELT (FUTURE)

*Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE.

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - QUARRv BELT (FUTURE)

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.1900

Emission Limit I Unit: LBiH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.5500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

http://cfpub .epa.govhblclReports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 11125/2009
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 Fr (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0900

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 0.2600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations infl uence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2l4 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: LIMESTONE CONVEYOR BELT TO FEED BINS

*Process Type: 90.019

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

Pollutant Information:NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - LIMESTONE CONVEYOR BELT

TO FEED BINS

xPollutantName Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1112512009
Format RBLC Report

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2I5 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: SAND/MILL scALE CoNVEyoR BELT To FEED BINS *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - SAND IMILL SCALE CONVEYOR

BELT TO FEED BINS

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http://cfpub.epa'gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25lill}g
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FPM10)

*Control Method Code: A

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.0100

. Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2IJnit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 216 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: RAV/ MIX coNVEYoR BELT To GRINDING sysrEM *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

ffi:Jåtñ:lunit: FUGrrrvE EMrssroNS ARE AN ESTTMATE

POIIutant InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - RAW MIX CONVEYOR BELT To

GRINDING SYSTEM

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

TimeiCondition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2IT of229

Process Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Proces's Name: CLINKER PAN CONVEYOR

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTES: CLINKER PAN CONVEYOR TO STORAGE SILO. FUGITIVE

EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: NORTFI TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CLINKER PAN CONVEYOR

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0700

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

TimeiCondition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

http://cfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0400

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2lS o1229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CLINKER CONVEYOR

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCCSS Notes: CLINKER CONVEYOR BELT TO FINISH GRINDING AREA. FUGITIVE

EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANt lNfOTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - CLINKER CONVEYOR

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.1300

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIH

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0700

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page2I9 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MATEzuAL HANDLING, ADDITIVES To GRINDING *Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCESS NOTES: ADDITIVE CONVEYOR BELT TO FINISH GRINDING AREA.

FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATERIAL HANDLING,

ADDITIVES TO GRINDING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: p

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

, Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0600

Emission Limit 2Unít: Tly

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name particulate matter, filterable < l0 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: p

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBIIJ'

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0300

. Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
Format RBLC Report

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page220 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS NAME: MAT HANDLING, COALiCOKE LINLOADING CONVEYOR BELT *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE

POIIUtANI INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MAT HANDLING, COALiCOKE TINLOADING CONVEYOR BELT

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆI

Emission Limit I Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2IJntt: TiyR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name particulate -uu.r, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: p

*control Method covERED coNVEyoR BELT, WATER spRAy Description:

Emission Limit l: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LBÆI

Emission Limit I Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2IJnit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/ReportsiRptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 

1 ll25/2009
Format RBLC Report

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page22l of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS NAMC: MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR TO STACKER *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

. Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy.

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE

CONVEYOR TO STACKER

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LBÆI

Emission Limit I Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2rJnit: TiyR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then airU

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page222 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MATERIAL HANDLING, coAL/coKE STACKER To PILE *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy

POllutant InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATEzuAL HANDLING,

COAL/COKE STACKER TO PILE

*PollutantName Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method PARTIAL ENCLOSURES, V/ATER SpRAyS

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limít2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable . 10 p (FpMrO) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method ENCLOSURE, WATER SpRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LP,IH

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*PTOCESS NAME: MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR TO COAL GRINDING

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1 Il25l200g
Format RBLC Report Page223 of229

*Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Tbroughput:

Throughput Unit:

PTOCEss Notes: COAL/COKE CONVEYOR BELT TO COAL GRINDING SYSTEM.

FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY

POIIUtAnt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE

CONVEYOR TO COAL GRINDING

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM)

*Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unít: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

. Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpMlO) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

, *PTOCESS NAME: MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE CONVEYOR TO MILL FEED BIN *Process Type: 90.011

' Primary Fuel:

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/þtDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy

Page224 of229

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MAT HANDLING COAL/COKE

CONVEYOR TO MILL FEED BIN

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (PM) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/YR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method COVERED CONVEYOR BELT

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100

Emission Limit I Unit: LBiH

Emission Limit 1 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg. LESS THAN

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MATEzuAL sroRAGE, coAL/coKE PILES *Process Type: 90.011

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy.

http:llcfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll25/2009
' Foirnat RBLC Report Page225 of229

POIIUtANt InfoTmation: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MATERIAL STORAGE,

COAL/COKE PILES

*PollutantName Particulate matter,filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: P

*Control Method SPRAY THE C/C PILES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2800

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.2100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR ' Emission Limit 2 Avg.

, Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: p

*Cohtrol Method SPRAY THE C/C PILES

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.5500

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 2.4100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: ADDITIVE PILE

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE ONLY

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT coMpANy - ADDITIVE PILE

http:llcfpub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetailListingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 ll125/2009
Format RBLC Report

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

EmissionLimit 1: 0.1600

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.7000

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiyR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, firterable < 10 p (FpM10) *Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0800

Emission Limit 1 Unit:. LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.3500

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page 226 of 229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: MILL SCALE PILE *Process Type: 90.029

Primary Fuel: I

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy

POIIUtANt INfOTMAtiON: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY - MILL SCALE PILE

*Pollutant Name Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: p

*Control Method WATER SpRAyS

Description:

http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 IIl25l2009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit 1: 0.0300

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition: ' EmissionLimit2: 0.1100

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiyR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 F GpMl0) *Control Method Code: p

. *Control Method WATER SpRAy

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0600

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page227 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: SAND PILE

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT coMpANy - SAND PILE

*Pollutant Name particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0300

Emission Limit I Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcfpub'epa.govhblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 lll2s12009
Format RBLC Report

Emission Limit2: 0.1100

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpMl0) *Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.0200

Emission Limit 1 Unit: LB/H

Emission Limit I Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.0600

Emission Limit 2Unit: TiyR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page228 of229

Process Information : NORTH TEXAS CEMENT COMPANY

*Process Name: CLINKER PILE

*Process Type: 90.028

Primary Fuel:

Throughput

Throughput Unit:

Process Notes: FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ARE AN ESTIMATE oNLy

Pollutant Information: NORTH TEXAS CEMENT CoMpANy - CLINKER PILE

*PollutantName Particulate Matter (pM) *Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

Emission Limit

: 0.4200

Unit: LB'IH

Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 1.8000

Emission Limit 2Unit: T/yR

Emission Limit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

http:llcþub'epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:S00 lIl25l200g
Format RBLC Report

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations infl uenee

the BACT decisions?:

*Pollutant Name Particulate matter, filterable < 10 p (FpM10)

*Control Method Code: N

*Control Method

Description:

Emission Limit 1: 0.2100

Emission Limit I Unit: LBI}I

' Emission Limit 1 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Emission Limit2: 0.9000

Emission Limit 2Unit: TfyR

EmissionLimit 2 Avg.

Time/Condition:

Did factors, other then air U

pollution technology

considerations influence

the BACT decisions?:

Page229 of229

http:lhfp¿lb.epa.gov/rblc/Reports/RptDetaillistingAllFields.cfm?RequestTimeout:500 1I/25DIAI