30186 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents Proposed for Incorporation 

by Reference 

This document proposes to amend 

FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 6, 2014, and effective 

September 15, 2014. FAA Order 

7400.9Y is publicly available as listed in 

the ADDRESSES section of this proposed 

rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists Class A, 

B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic 

service routes, and reporting points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at Ed Carlson 

Memorial Field-South Lewis County 

Airport, Toledo, WA. After a review of 

the airspace, the FAA found 

modification of the airspace necessary 

for the safety and management of IFR 

operations for SIAPs at the airport. The 

Class E airspace area would be modified 

to a 4-mile radius of the Ed Carlson 

Memorial-South Lewis County Airport, 

with segments extending from the 4- 

mile radius to 8 miles northeast of the 

airport, and 7 miles southwest of the 

airport. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, 

and effective September 15, 2014, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

Section 106, describes the authority for 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of the airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it would 

amend controlled airspace at Ed Carlson 

Memorial-South Lewis County Airport, 

Toledo, WA. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2014, and 

effective September 15, 2014, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

ANM WA E5 Toledo, WA [Modified] 

Ed Carlson Memorial Field-South Lewis 

County Airport, WA 

(Lat. 46°28′38′′ N., long. 122°48′23′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 4-mile radius 

of the Ed Carlson Memorial Field-South 

Lewis County Airport, and within 1.2 miles 

each side of the 073° bearing from the airport 

extending from the 4-mile radius to 8 miles 

northeast of the airport, and within 1.8 miles 

each side of the 256° bearing from the airport 

extending from the 4-mile radius to 7 miles 

southwest of the airport. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on May 12, 

2015. 

Christopher Ramirez, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Western Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2015–12569 Filed 5–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Office of the Secretary 

25 CFR Chapters I, II, III, V, VI, and VII 

[156D0102DM DS6CS00000 

DLSN00000.000000 DX6CS25] 

Reducing Regulatory Burden; 

Retrospective Review 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior. 

ACTION: Request for public input. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Interior is requesting public input on 

selected regulations as part of its plan to 

review significant regulations in 

response to the President’s Executive 

Order on Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review. 

DATES: Please submit any comments on 

or before July 13, 2015 for immediate 

consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments only by 

one of the following methods: 

Email: RegsReview@ios.doi.gov. 

Mail: Regulatory Review, Office of the 

Executive Secretariat and Regulatory 

Affairs, Department of the Interior, 1849 

C Street NW., Mail Stop 7328, 

Washington, DC 20240. 

Hand Delivery or Courier: Regulatory 

Review, Office of the Executive 

Secretariat and Regulatory Affairs, 

Department of the Interior, Room 7311, 

1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 

20240. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Lawyer, Office of the Secretary, 

202–208–3181, Mark_Lawyer@

ios.doi.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of the Interior (DOI) 

published a notice on February 25, 2011 

(76 FR 10526), asking the public for 

ideas and information as it prepared a 

preliminary plan for retrospective 

regulatory review to comply with 

President Obama’s Executive Order 

13563 dated January 18, 2011, 

‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory 

Review.’’ We received helpful 


Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules 30187 

information in response to this request, 

which we considered in preparing our 

plan for retrospective regulatory review. 

The plan is available on DOI’s Open 

Government Web site at: http://

www.doi.gov/open/regsreview/. This 

Web site provides links to the plan, the 

Department’s regulations, and an email 

in-box at RegsReview@ios.doi.gov that 

interested parties may use to suggest, on 

an ongoing basis, improvements to 

DOI’s regulations. 

We continue to invite comment on all 

of our regulations but are specifically 

asking for public comment on the 

following regulations or policy 

documents at this time: 

25 CFR part 169—Rights-of-Way on 

Indian Land (1076–AF20) 

25 CFR part 23—Indian Child Welfare 

Act (1076–AF25) 

25 CFR part 256—Housing Improvement 

Program (1076–AF22) 

Expanding Incentives for Voluntary 

Conservation Actions Under the 

Endangered Species Act (1018–AY29) 

Ongoing Public Engagement 

DOI views retrospective regulatory 

review as a continuing process. Public 

engagement is an essential element, and 

the public may submit feedback at any 

time via email at RegsReview@

ios.doi.gov. 

At this time, we are asking for 

comments related to the following 

questions: 

(1) Are there any specific changes we 

could make to these regulations that 

would make them more effective or less 

burdensome in achieving their 

regulatory objectives? 

(2) DOI has proposed specific rules to 

review over the next two years. Are 

there other rules that could benefit from 

retrospective review in the near future? 

If so, please identify the rules by their 

CFR citation (e.g., 25 CFR part 39) or by 

their subject matter (e.g., forestry rules) 

and give us detailed ideas on how we 

can streamline, consolidate, or make 

these regulations more efficient. Please 

suggest specific language that would 

make these rules or guidance more 

efficient and less burdensome where 

possible. 

(3) Are there ways DOI can better 

scale its regulations to lessen the 

burdens imposed on small entities 

within the existing statutory 

requirements? Please suggest specific 

things we could do to exempt small 

entities or provide more flexible or lessburdensome requirements while still 

satisfying the requirements of the law. 

(4) Are DOI regulations and guidance 

written in language that is clear and 

easy to understand? Please suggest 

which regulations and guidance are 

good candidates for a rewriting in plain 

language. 

(5) How can we ensure that our 

regulations promote our mission in 

ways that are most efficient and least 

burdensome to the public? 

The Department is issuing this request 

solely to seek useful information as part 

of its ongoing public engagement 

process. Responses to this request do 

not bind DOI to any further actions 

related to the response. 

Before including your address, or 

other personal identifying information 

in your comment, you should be aware 

that your entire comment—including 

your personal identifying information— 

may be made publicly available at any 

time pursuant to the Freedom of 

Information Act. While you can ask us 

in your comment to withhold your 

personal identifying information from 

the public review, we would seek to 

honor your request to the extent 

allowable under the law but we cannot 

guarantee that we will be able to do so. 

Authority: E.O. 13653, 76 FR 3821, Jan. 

21, 2011; E.O. 12866, 58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 

1993. 

Dated: May 20, 2015. 

Michael L. Connor, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–12622 Filed 5–22–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4334–34–P 

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF 

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE 

32 CFR Part 1701 

Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation 

AGENCY: Office of the Director of 

National Intelligence. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Office of the Director of 

National Intelligence (ODNI) proposes 

to exempt two new systems of records 

from subsections (c)(3); (d)(1),(2),(3),(4); 

(e)(1) and (e)(4)(G),(H),(I); and (f) of the 

Privacy Act. With respect to the existing 

system of records named ODNI 

Information Technology Systems 

Activity and Access Records (ODNI–19), 

the ODNI proposes to invoke subsection 

(k)(2) as an additional rationale for 

exempting records from these 

provisions of the Privacy Act. The ODNI 

has previously established a rule, 

published on March 28, 2008, that will 

preserve the exempt status of records it 

receives when the reason for the 

exemption remains valid. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

July 6, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. 

Email: DNI-FederalRegister@dni.gov. 

Mail: Information Management 

Division, Office of the Director of 

National Intelligence, Washington, DC 

20511. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer L. Hudson, Director, 

Information Management Division, 

Office of the Chief Information Officer, 

Office of the Director of National 

Intelligence, Washington, DC 20511; 

703–874–8085. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

compliance with the Privacy Act, 5 

U.S.C. 552a(e)(4), the ODNI describes in 

the notice section of this Federal 

Register the following two new systems 

of records: Counterintelligence Trends 

Analyses Records (ODNI/NCSC–002) 

and Insider Threat Program Records 

(ODNI–22). As permitted by the Privacy 

Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), pursuant to this 

rulemaking, the Director of National 

Intelligence (DNI) is invoking 

exemption of records in these systems 

from the requirements of certain 

provisions of the Privacy Act, as 

described herein. In addition, the DNI is 

invoking subsection 552a(k)(2) as a 

further basis of exemption for records 

contained in the existing system entitled 

Information Technology Systems 

Activity and Access Records (ODNI–19). 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

This proposed rule affects the manner 

in which the ODNI collects and 

maintains information about 

individuals. The ODNI certifies that this 

rulemaking will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Accordingly, 

pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, no regulatory 

flexibility analysis is required for this 

rule. 

Small Entity Inquiries 

The Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 

1996 requires the ODNI to comply with 

small entity requests for information 

and advice about compliance with 

statutes and regulations within the 

ODNI’s jurisdiction. Any small entity 

that has a question regarding this 

document may address it to the 

information contact listed above. 

Further information regarding SBREFA 

is available on the Small Business 

Administration’s Web page at http://

www.sga.gov/advo/law/law_lib.html. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the 


Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS