alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5585 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                    September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2006.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
5585) entitled ``An Act to improve the netting process for financial 
contracts, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)Strike section 7 (relating to compensation of chapter 7 trustees; chapter 7 
filing fees).

(2)In section 8 (relating to scope of application), strike the section heading 
and all that follows through ``the amendments made'' and insert the following:

``SEC. 7. SCOPE OF APPLICATION.

    ``The amendments made''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5585

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Project No. 13-023] 

On March 24, 2009, Office of Energy Projects staff will participate by teleconference in a work group meeting to discuss fishery resources and fish passage issues for the relicensing of the Green Island Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 13-023). The meeting will begin at 11 a.m. EDST. 

For parties wishing to participate in the teleconference, the call-in number is 1-866-448-6761 (participant code: 129040#). For further information please contact Wendy Jo Carey, Albany Engineering Corporation, at (518) 456-7712, ext. 401, or Tom Dean, FERC, at (202) 502-6041. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E9-5557 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
.~~, .

.'

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

and

American Ref~Fuel Company

of Southeastern Connecticut

TRADING AGREEMENT AND

ORDER NO. 8095 MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATIQN

In the matter of a Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner of Envirorunental

Protection ("Commissioner") and American Ref-Fuel Company of Southeastem Connecticut

("Company").

WHEREAS, the Commissioner and the Company, having agreed to the terms and

conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8095 issued on June 2, 1995, do now, by

mutual agreement, modify paragraphs C.3., C.3.E., CA. and C.12. as follows:

1. Change the date specified in paragraph C.3. from May 1, 1999 to

December 14, 1999.

2. Replace paragraph C.3.E. as follows: No later than March l, 1999 and 2000 include

with its annual emissions report to the Commissioner, the NOx emissions and

ERCs used for the previous calendar year and

3. Change the second date specified in paragraph CA. from May I, 1999 to

December 14, 1999.

4. Change the first date specified in paragraph C12. from May 1, 1999 to

December 14, 1999.

All other tell11s and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8095 issued by the

Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6, 22a-171, 22a-174, 22a-176, 22a-177 and 22a-1 78 of

the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

Initials: ,~"'-'''''--_

(Printed on Recycled P~per)

79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106 - 5127

IIIIP:fld ep.state, ct.\IS

All Equal Opportunity Employu

Date: L.j - 2..?-9'9
American Ref-Fuel Company

of Southeastern Connecticut

2 TRADING AGREEMENT

AND ORDER NO. 8095

MODIFICATION

American Ref-Fuel Company of Southeastern Connecticut hereby consents to the entry of this

modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice.

American Ref-Fuel Company of Southeastern Connecticut

Signature: 6(,c I2JllSj()f

Type Name: C. ~,-i. tig" i<.. S;u,,,,f

Type Title: PI""" -\- t1\o.ngq -erDate: Ar,1 2.<?, ('?? y

Entered as a modification of an Order ofthe Commissioner of Environmental Protection numbered

8095 this _--"2"-91--__day of !irJ

CITY OF PRESTON

LAND RECORDS

MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Certified Document No.

1999.

rthur J. Rocque, Jr.

Commissioner
IN RE Verna Francis Coley THETFORD, Relator

NO. 02-17-00182-CV

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

DELIVERED: June 15, 2017

MARY H. BARKLEY, STEPHEN J. HUSCHKA, CANTEY HANGER LLP, FORT WORTH, TEXAS AND ROBERT E. ALDRICH, JR., ALDRICH PLLC, FORT WORTH, TEXAS, FOR RELATOR.

ALFRED G. ALLEN, III, TURNER & ALLEN, GRAHAM, TEXAS AND DONALD E. HERRMANN, DAVID E. KELTNER, JOE GREENHILL, KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP, FOR REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST.

PANEL: MEIER, SUDDERTH, and PITTMAN, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**1

1

*See* Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

PER CURIAM

*188The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Furthermore, our stay of the trial court proceedings in cause number 33186, styled *Guardianship of Verna Francis Coley Thetford, an Incapacitated Person* , pending in the 90th District Court of Young County, Texas, is hereby lifted.
The NEW BETHLEHEM MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellant, v. CASS COMMERCIAL BANK, Church Mutual Insurance Company, and Alan Snorton, Respondents.

No. ED 105721

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: May 9, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 13, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Thomas C. DeVoto, 7646 Watson Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63119-5002.

For Respondent: Robert W. Cockerham, Ryan T. Knopf, 10803 Olive Blvd., St. Louis, Mo 63141.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

The New Bethlehem Missionary Baptist Church ("New Bethlehem") filed a petition for damages against respondents, Church Mutual Insurance Company ("Church Mutual"); a claims adjuster for Church Mutual, Alan Snorton ("Snorton"); and Cass Commercial Bank ("Cass Commercial"). New Bethlehem entered into a settlement agreement and release with Cass Commercial prior to trial, which was enforced by the trial court. Pursuant to the settlement, the trial court entered a dismissal, with *734prejudice, in favor of Cass Commercial with regards to New Bethlehem's petition for damages. New Bethlehem's petition for damages against Church Mutual and Snorton was tried and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Church Mutual and Snorton. New Bethlehem appeals from the trial court's dismissal, with prejudice, and its judgment, following a jury trial. Cass Commercial requests this Court order New Bethlehem to pay attorney's fees on appeal pursuant to Local Rule 400. Accordingly, we grant Cass Commercial's request for attorney's fees on appeal in the amount of $10,000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Forest Road Stormwater Discharges

FROM: Prasad Chumble

Rural Branch

Water Permits Division, 4203M

TO: The File

DATE: 5/26/16

EPA met with the BLM on 3 / 2 3/16, to obtain information on the BLM’s programs to reduce stormwater

runoff from forest roads. The BLM described its programs, including its enforcement structure, and

noted that BLM ’ s current programs are sufficient in addressing runoff from forest roads. BLM submitted

the following materials:

 BLM Inf o to EPA submiss ion Transmittal Memo 6

- 6

- 16

 Environmental Management NW Draft
**Exhibit 15.4**

 

8 June 2015

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C., USA

20549-7561

 

Dear Sirs/Madams,

 

 

We have read Vodafone Group Plc’s disclosure pursuant to Item 16.F(a) of Form 20-F as set out in paragraph seven in the section entitled “Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP” on page 66 of Vodafone Group Plc’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 March 2015. We agree with the statements made in relation to Deloitte LLP. We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

 

Yours truly,

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

----
#### Stannard Supply Company *et al. v.*Delmar Coal Company *et al.*

(No. 7915)

Submitted April 24, 1934.

Decided May 22, 1934.

*65
      *Wm. T. George,*for appellant.

*Charles B. Johnson*and *Wm. G. Johnson,*for appel-lees.

Litz, Judge:

This appeal involves the reasonableness of an allowance to a special receiver.

In the above styled consolidated causes, instituted by creditors of Delmar Coal Company, an insolvent corporation, to administer its assets, Carl L. Hornor and Edgar S. Phillips were appointed special receivers and Charles B. Johnson, W. Bruce Talbott and Frank Amos attorneys for them. In a decree of August 7, 1930, directing sale of the assets, the trial chancellor, without evidence as to the reasonableness thereof, decreed compensation to the special receivers and their counsel. The allowances, upon an appeal to this court by Pittsvein Coal Company, a lien creditor of Delmar Coal Company, and Waddell Fuel Company, assignee of Pittsvein Coal Company, were set aside and the causes remanded “for the purpose of ascertaining reasonable compensation (for the special receivers and counsel) upon notice and hearing”. When the eases went back, the special receivers and attorneys adduced evidence to prove that the original allowances had been consented to by counsel for Pittsvein Coal Company and that the same were reasonable; whereupon, another decree was entered, reducing the fees, as originally determined, to all of the parties except Hornor; his compensation being fixed in both decrees at $6,000.00. From the last decree, Phillips and all of the attorneys appealed. Hornor and Wad-dell Fuel Company were served as appellees. Waddell Fuel Company cross-assigned error to the fees allowed Hor-nor, Johnson,' Talbott and Amos. The decree was affirm*66ed. Thereafter, Waddell Fuel Company obtained this appeal from that part of the decree fixing compensation to Hornor, who now moves its dismissal on the ground that the matter involved was settled by the former judgment of this court, affirming the decree, and further contends that his-allowance is reasonable. In affirming the decree, upon the appeal of Johnson, Phillips, Talbott and Amos, we held: “The allowance of counsel fees to attorneys representing receivers is largely for the determination of the receivership court, and will not be changed or modified on appeal except for abuse of a sound discretion. 2 Smith on Receivers (2nd Ed.), 1733; 53 C. J. 378; Clark on Receivers, (2nd Ed.), sec. 642 (a). The same rule applies to compensation for receivers.”

Without considering the motion to dismiss or detailing the evidence upon which the trial court acted, we are of opinion that the rule, applied to the facts, requires a re-affirmance of the decree.

*Affirmed.*
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       



|Date: August 10, 2009
|---------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w3









Exhibit 10.3




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	www.netapp.com
	 	919 476 5750 Tel
	 	7301 Kit Creek Road

Research Triangle Park, NC

27709






NOTICE OF TERMINATION




December 17, 2009




J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, as Agent to the Credit Agreement referred to below




Attention: Bank Loan Syndications Department



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The undersigned, NetApp, Inc., refers to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2007
(as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, and including all
exhibits thereto, the “Credit Agreement”, the terms defined therein being used herein as
therein defined), among the undersigned, certain Lenders parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., as Agent, and hereby gives you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.09(c) of the Credit
Agreement that the undersigned hereby requests a termination of the Credit Agreement effective as
of December 22, 2009.



Very truly yours,




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	NetApp, Inc.

 	 
	By  	/s/ Ingemar Lanevi	 
	  	Name: Ingemar Lanevi 	 
	  	Title: Vice President & Corporate Treasurer 	 
	 


Legal Reference
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Anna Ruiloba,

 

 Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00123-CR

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D02097)

O R D E R

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require the trial court to enter a certification of 

the defendant’s right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other 

appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The certification must include a notice that the 

defendant has been informed of his rights concerning an appeal, as well as any right to file a pro 

se petition for discretionary review. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification must be signed 

by the defendant and a copy must be given to him. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

The clerk’s record in this cause contains the trial court’s certification pursuant to 

TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), but the certification is defective because it has not been signed by the 

trial court judge. Accordingly, we direct the trial court to remedy the defect in the certification 

by preparing and filing a Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal which 

includes the defendant’s, counsel’s, and judge’s signatures. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). All of the 

provisions of 25.2(d) should be complied with including the requirement that the defendant be 

informed of his rights concerning an appeal, as well as any right to file a pro se petition for 

discretionary review. 

The trial court is further ordered to forward the certification to the District Clerk of El 

Paso County, Texas and the same shall be included in a Supplemental Clerk’s Record and filed 

with this Court on or before November 26, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of October, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5503 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5503

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount 
  limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing 
                      located in high-cost areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Multifamily Loan Limit 
Adjustment Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE LIMITS IN HIGH COST AREAS.

    The National Housing Act is amended--
            (1) in sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 
        221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 231(c)(2)(B), and 
        234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 
        1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B), and 
        1715y(e)(3)(B))--
                    (A) by striking ``140 percent'' each place such 
                term appears and inserting ``170 percent''; and
                    (B) by striking ``170 percent in high cost areas'' 
                each time place such term appears and inserting ``215 
                percent in high cost areas''; and
            (2) in section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III) (12 U.S.C. 
        1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III)) by striking ``206A'' and all that 
        follows through ``project-by-project basis'' and inserting the 
        following: ``206A of this Act) by not to exceed 170 percent in 
        any geographical area where the Secretary finds that cost 
        levels so require and by not to exceed 170 percent, or 215 
        percent in high cost areas, where the Secretary determines it 
        necessary on a project-by-project basis''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5503

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount 
  limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing 
                      located in high-cost areas.
```
UNIT





<page>  EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2005





MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5504 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6029 Broadmoor Street in Mission, Kansas, as the ``Larry Winn, Jr. 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LARRY WINN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6029 Broadmoor Street in Mission, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Larry Winn, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Larry 
Winn, Jr. Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 19, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5504

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6029 Broadmoor Street in Mission, Kansas, as the ``Larry Winn, Jr. 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Vivian Lam Lee Yu, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. on the Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oxford Technologies, Inc.







|                   |  |     |  |                                                              
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |     |  |                                                              
|Date:  May 5, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Vivian Lam Lee Yu                                        
|                   |  |     |  | Vivian Lam Lee Yu, President                                 
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)