alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION



I, David J. Gallagher, President and Chief Executive Officer of QSound Labs, Inc. certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for 2006 of QSound Labs, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the company and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.









/s/ David J. Gallagher

David J. Gallagher

President and Chief Executive Officer





March 23, 2007
Raymond W. SCHNEIDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 105413

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: October 2, 2018

Randall Brachman, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, 221 W. High St. P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

*539Raymond Schneider ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his trial counsel was ineffective. Finding that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less
Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007



/s/*Barry Lamperd*
  Barry Lamperd 
  President and Director 
  (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
  Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
----

----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                      |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                  K. John                  Shukur      |   |   |   |   |
| K.                  John                  Shukur          |   |   |   |   |
| Chief                  Executive                  Officer |   |   |   |   |
| November                  13, 2007                        |   |   |   |   |
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5428 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2006 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 202 East Washington Street in Morris, Illinois, as the ‘‘Joshua A. Terando Morris Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

HR 5428 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. JOSHUA A. TERANDO MORRIS POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 202 East Washington Street in 

5 Morris, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Joshua A. Terando Morris Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joshua A. Terando 

11 Morris Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 

2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
Exhibit 23

Sellers & Associates P.C.                                         (801) 621-8128
3785 Harrison Blvd., Suite 101 - Ogden, Utah 84403            Fax (801) 627-1639




April 13, 2000



Board of Directors

Professional Wrestling Alliance Corporation
Van Nuys, California

Gentlemen:


We hereby  consent  to the use of our audit  report  of  Professional  Wrestling
Alliance  Corporation  and  subsidiary  dated  April 4, 2000 for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998 in the Company's Form 10-KSB/A.

   /s/ Sellers & Associates, P.C.
---------------------------------
Sellers & Associates, P.C.
Ogden, UT

                                       17


<PAGE>
#### Alfred Townsend, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed February 13, 1928.

*140
      *A. Lee Humphreys*and *Stafford Caldwell,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *II. E. Carter,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Upon an indictment charging murder in the first degree by inflicting mortal wounds “from a premeditated design to effect the death of” the deceased the plaintiff in error was found ‘ ‘ guilty of murder in the first degree” and recommended to the mercy of the court, and under the statute was sentenced to life imprisonment. 'While the sentence is to life imprisonment, the conviction is of murder in the first degree, to sustain which, on this record, there must be facts and circumstances adduced in the evidence from which the jury may lawfully have drawn an inference that the alleged homicide was “perpetrated from a premeditated design to effect the death of” a human being.

Where a verdict of murder in the first degree is assailed in the appellate court on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence, facts and circumstances from which the jury could have found all the essential elements of the *141crime alleged must appear from the evidence contained in the bill of exceptions and incorporated in the duly certified transcript of the record, or a new trial will be granted. Baker v. State, 54 Fla. 12, 44 South. 719.

Premeditated design to effect death is an essential element of the crime of murder in the first degree, and where the evidence offered is insufficient to establish this element of the crime, a judgment upon a verdict finding the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree will be reversed. Richardson v. State, 80 Fla. 634, 86 South. Rep. 619; Smithie v. State, 84 Fla. 498, 94 South. Rep. 156.

In a conviction for murder in the first degree, where the evidence as to the identity of the accused as being the guilty party is not satisfactory, a new trial should be granted. Nims v. State, 70 Fla. 530, 70 South. Rep. 565; Platt v. State, 65 Fla. 253, 61 South. Rep. 502; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179, 79 South. Rep. 450; Watson v. State, 85 Fla. 383, 95 South. Rep. 861; Asher v. State, 90 Fla. 75, 105 South. Rep. 140. See also Ming v. State, 89 Fla. 280, 103 South. Rep. 618.

In view of the nature of the evidence as to the identity of the person who committed the offense and as to premeditated design, a new trial should be granted and it is so ordered.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Strum, J., not participating.
Andre WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 105585

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: June 12, 2018

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Daniel N. McPherson, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

Andre Wilson appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 (2010). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 19 8 . I N THE I N TEREST OF A. B., a chi l d.

On J an uary 1 , 2 0 21 , t hi s Co u rt g ran t ed APPELLANT’ S a p p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap peal

. Hav i n g rev i ewed t h e p art i es ’ b ri efs an d t h e reco rd n o w b efo re

u s , we DISM ISS t h e ap peal as i m p ro v i d en t l y

g ran t ed

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## May 04, 2022

05/04/2022
#### Mary Securo, *Infant, etc.,*v. Tony Securo

(No. C.C. 439)

Submitted January 14, 1931.

Decided January 20, 1931.

*J. W. Powell,*for plaintiff.

*Eddy*& *Kennedy,*for defendant.

Maxwell, Judge:

The plaintiff, an unemancipated girl of sixteen, residing with her father, the defendant, was injured in an automobile accident while a passenger in her father’s automobile, driven by him. She sues him for damages. The circuit court overruled the defendant’s demurrer to the declaration and has certified to us the question of the sufficiency of the declaration *2particularly on the point as to whether the plaintiff may maintain this action against her father.

In many of the states the courts have recognized and followed the rule that an unemancipated infant may not maintain an action of tort against his parents. *Hewellette*v. *George,*(Miss.) 9 So. 885; *Elias*v. *Collins,*(Mich.) 211 N. W. 88, 52 A. L. R. 1118 and annotation; *Wick*v. *Wick,*(Wis.) 212 N. W. 787; *Small*v. *Morrison,*(N. C.) 118 S. E. 12, 31 A. L. R. 1135 and annotation; *Matarese*v. *Matarese,*(R. I.) 131 Atl. 198; *Ciani*v. *Ciani,*215 N. Y. S. 767; *Taubert*v. *Taubert,*(Minn.) 114 N. W. 763; *McKelvey*v. *McKelvey,*(Tenn.) 77 S. W. 664; *Smith*v. *Smith,*(Ind.) 142 N. E. 128; *Roller*v. *Roller,*(Wash.) 79 Pac. 788. (In the last case a girl was denied the i’ight to maintain an action against her father for damages, though the wrong complained of was rape.) See texts also: 20 Ruling Case Law, page 631; 46 Corpus Juris, page 1324; Schouler, Domestic Relations, (6th Ed.) Vol. I, page 717; Cooley on Torts (3rd Ed.) Vol. I, page 299.

The basis of this rule, as appears from the cases and texts, lies in the very vital interest which society has in preserving harmony in domestic relations, and in not permitting families to be torn asunder by suits for damages by petulant, insolent or ungrateful children against their parents for real or fancied grievances. It is deemed better that an occasional wrong should go unrequited than that family life should be subjected to the disrupting effects of such suits. This reasoning is certainly sound in so far as it applies to supposed causes of action resting merely on carelessness or failure to exercise due diligence and judgment, and that, of course, includes the instant case. But whether the rule should be carried to the extent, as some of the cases have done, of denying an infant the right to maintain an action for damages against his parent for injury inflicted with evil intention and from wicked motives is a question not now before us but remains for consideration if such unfortunate situation should arise.

We sustain the demurrer to the declaration and dismiss the action.

*Beversed and rendered.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Health Alternatives, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. McDonald, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|   |  |                                   
|-- |  | ----------------------------------
|By |  | /s/ Richard E. McDonald           
|   |  | Richard E. McDonald               
|   |  | President, Chief Executive Officer



Date: May 16, 2005
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Andre Calantzopoulos



 Exhibit 10.23 

 

 

  

			
		 	 PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
  

Andre Calantzopoulos
  
 Lausanne, April 1, 2010


 Dear Andre, 

Further to your annual performance assessment and discussion with your supervisor, we are pleased to confirm that effective as of April 1, 2010,
your annual base salary is being increased by 3.5%. 
  

			
	from CHF 1’384’682.— p.a.*	  	CHF 106’514.— p.m.*
		
	to CHF 1’433’146.— p.a.	  	CHF 110’242.— p.m.

 Your new Position in Range
as a result of this salary increase, is now 49%. 
 All other conditions relating to your employment with Philip Morris International Management
SA remain as stated in your letter of employment issued at the time of the engagement and, if applicable, in any subsequent amendments. 
 We
take this opportunity of wishing you continued success and satisfaction. 
 Yours sincerely, 

 

			
	/S/ PETER-PAUL ADRIAANSEN	 	/S/ RALF ZYSK
	Peter-Paul Adriaansen	 	Ralf Zysk
	Director Human Resources	 	Vice President Center of Expertise
	Decision Support & Business Partner	 	Reward & Retain and Mobility
	Switzerland	 	

 *p.a. = annual 
 *p.m. = monthly 
 Philip Morris International Management S.A. 

AVENUE DE RHODANIE 50 • CASE POSTALE 1171 • 1001 LAUSANNE • SWITZERLAND • TELEPHONE: +4l 58 242 00 00 • TELEFAX:
+41 58 242 01 01 
 www.philipmorrisinternational.com
-78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

 40.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/06

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.46 N 76.63 W Meters AGL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,439]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 2, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Mazer Corporation, Creative Services Division, Dayton, Ohio.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9-5921 Filed 3-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P