alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      23.1











CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        No.
        333-18217, No. 333-37040, No. 333-91882, No. 333-91884 and No. 333-130355,
        each
        on Form S-8 for Vineyard National Bancorp, of our reports dated March 14,
        2006
        with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Vineyard National Bancorp
        and
        Subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
        statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years
        in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 and management’s assessment of
        the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December
        31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
        as
        of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual
        report on Form 10-K of Vineyard National Bancorp.
  /s/
        Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP
 Rancho
        Cucamonga, California
 March
        14,
        2006
#### 587 Development Incorporated, Respondent-Appellant, v Avenue Z Construction Co. et al., Appellants-Respondents.

[718 NYS2d 869]

In an action to compel specific performance of an agreement granting the plaintiff an option to purchase certain real property owned by the defendant Avenue Z Construction Co., the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Arniotes, J.), dated October 4, 1999, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied its cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

As each party raised triable issues of fact in opposition to the other party’s prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiffs motion and the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment were properly denied *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
CARDIORENTIS AG v. IQVIA LTD. and Iqvia RDS, Inc.

168A19-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 15, 2019

J. Dickson Phillips, III, Attorney at Law, for Cardiorentis AG.

Charles F. Marshall, III, Attorney at Law, for Iqvia Ltd. and Iqvia RDS, Inc.

Jonathan C. Krisko, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Cardiorentis AG.

Shepard D. O'Connell, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Iqvia Ltd. and Iqvia RDS, Inc.

Catherine E. Stetson, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Cardiorentis AG.

Kyle M. Druding, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Cardiorentis AG.

Michael J. Klisch, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Iqvia Ltd. and Iqvia RDS, Inc.

Joshua M. Siegel, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Iqvia Ltd. and Iqvia RDS, Inc.

Robert T. Cahill, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Iqvia Ltd. and Iqvia RDS, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 15th of August 2019 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of August 2019."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 9th day of September 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 99.4
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dairene International (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Edwin
M. Golstein,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Controller of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Edwin M. Golstein /s/
Edwin M. Golstein
Chief Financial Officer and Controller
January 30, 2004
Exhibit
32.2








PACIFIC
STATE BANCORP





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements and Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company











Date:  May
15, 2009


/S/ Justin R.
Garner


Justin R.
Garner


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 31, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 31, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A2067. WILLIAM EARL SMITH III v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

136522 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices v SC: 136522 COA: 275752 Wayne CC: 06-008244-01 DWAYNE DARNELL BALLINGER, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 10, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Hailan Xu, the ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of RUB A DUB SOAP, INC. (the "Company"), DOHEREBY CERTIFY that: 

1. The Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

2. Information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of theundersigned has executed this statement this 9th day of May 2008. 

/s/ Hailan Xu                                              Hailan Xu Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Rub A Dub Soap, Inc. and will be retained byRub A Dub Soap Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It isnot being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing. 

----
exv10w116






Exhibit 10.116




Select Medical Corporation

4714 Gettysburg Road

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055




March 8, 2011




Mr. James J. Talalai

Select Medical Corporation

4714 Gettysburg Road

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055



RE: Fourth Amendment to the Agreement in the Event of a Change of Control of SMC



Dear Mr. Talalai:




     The following confirms our desire to amend the letter agreement, dated as of March 1, 2000
between you and Select Medical Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as amended on
February 23, 2001, February 24, 2005 and December 18, 2008 (the “Letter Agreement”).



     In consideration of your past and continued service to the Company and the mutual covenants
and agreements contained in this fourth amendment to the Letter Agreement (the “Amendment”), the
Company and you hereby agree, intending to be legally bound, as follows:


1. Section 3(a)(iii) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to
read as follows and all references to Section 3(a)(iii) in the Letter Agreement are hereby deleted:




     “(iii) Intentionally Omitted.”


2. Section 5(d) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as
follows:





“(d) As a condition to payment of any amount required under Section 1 hereof, you
shall deliver to the Company a general release of liability of the Company and its
officers and directors in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Company, such that
such release is effective, with all revocation periods having expired unexercised,
by no later than the (i) 60th day after such termination, in the event
of a Post-Change of Control Termination and (ii) first business day of the seventh
month following such termination, in the event of a Pre-Change of Control
Termination.”


3. Section 5(g) of the Letter Agreement is hereby amended to add the following to the end thereof:





“This Agreement is intended to comply with Code Section 409A (to the extent
applicable) and the parties hereto agree to interpret, apply and administer this
Agreement in the least restrictive manner necessary to comply therewith and
without resulting in any increase in the amounts owed hereunder by the Company.”



 









 



4. Except as amended hereby, the Letter Agreement shall continue in effect in accordance with its
terms.




     Please indicate your acceptance of the above Amendment by signing below in the space
indicated.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	Very Truly Yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION, a 

Delaware Corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Michael E. Tarvin
 

Name: Michael E. Tarvin
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Executive Vice President	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ James J. Talalai	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	James J. Talalai
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.17







LOCK-UP AGREEMENT







This AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as of the 7th day of March, 2011, by Junior Capital, Inc. (the "Holder"), a stockholder of Clicker, Inc. (the "Company").







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which consideration are hereby acknowledged, Holder agrees as follows:







1.  Share Restriction.  Holder hereby agrees that from the date hereof until the date which is one year from the date hereof (the “Restriction Date”), Holder (including all direct affiliates of Holder) will not sell, pledge, transfer, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of any capital stock of the Company, any rights to acquire capital stock of the Company or any capital stock which Holder has a right to acquire, whether such capital stock is registered in the name of the Holder or otherwise (“Holder’s Shares”), other than with the prior written consent of the Company.  Holder further agrees that the Company is authorized to place "stop orders" on its books to prevent any transfer of shares of capital stock or other securities by Holder in violation of this Agreement.







During the Restriction Period, Holder further agrees not vote or grant a proxy with respect to any of the Holder’s Shares, other than with the prior written consent of the Company.







2.           Reliance by the Company and Other Holders.  Holder acknowledges that the Company is relying upon the agreements of Holder contained herein, and that the failure of Holder to perform the agreements contained herein could have a detrimental effect upon the Company.  Accordingly, Holder understands and agrees that Holder's agreements herein are irrevocable.







3.           Miscellaneous.







a.           At any time, and from time to time, after the signing of this Agreement Holder will execute such additional instruments and take such action as may be reasonably requested by the Company to carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.







b.           This Agreement shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada, except to the extent that the securities laws of the state in which Holder resides and federal securities laws may apply.







c.           This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Holder with respect to the subject matter hereof.







d.           This Agreement shall be binding upon Holder, its legal representatives, successors and assigns.












 


 


 


 


 


 


******************************


 


 


 




  





1











  






 


 


             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Holder has executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 




	 	 
JUNIOR CAPITAL INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
 

	/s/ ALBERT AIMERS	 
	 	 	Albert Aimers, President	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 






















 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


2
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 2240 Lower Tribunal No. 2 1

- CA

- 00 2730

_____________________________
GCTC H OLDINGS , LLC
, Appellant
,

v.

B ELL R ESTAURANTS G ULF C OAST , I NC

. d/b/a N APLE C OASTAL K ITCHEN , S TUART B ELL , individually
, and L AURA B EL L , individually
,

Appellee s

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

.

Alane Laboda , Judge.

January 30, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

. NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and WHITE , JJ., c oncur.

Amy L. Dilday and Courtney L Fernald , of Englander and Fischer
, LLP
, St. Petersburg , for Appellant

. Brendan J. Shearman and Scott A. Beatty , of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt
, P.A., Naples , for Appellee s

.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                December 31, 2000

<TABLE>


<S>                                            <C>                                      <C>

                                               REDWOOD EMPIRE BANCORP (REB)
                                               Santa Rosa, California
                                               a California corporation


Redwood  Statutory Trust I                                                              National Bank of the Redwoods
Santa Rosa,  California                                                                 Santa Rosa,  California
a Connecticut statutory trust                                                           a national bank
Owned 100% by REB                                                                       Owned 100% by REB


Valley Financial Mortgage Corporation          Redwood Merchant Services, Inc.          Allied Diversified Credit
Santa Rosa, California                         Santa Rosa, California                   Santa Rosa, California
a California corporation                       a California corporation                 a California corporation
(dba Santa Rosa Mortgage and                   Owned 100% by NBR                        Owned 100% by NBR
Investment Company)                            Inactive                                 Inactive
Owned 100% by NBR
Inactive

</TABLE>
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS REGINALD HARRIS NO. 2021 KW 1411

FEBRUARY 14, 2022

In Re: Reginald Harris, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 02-04-0559.
BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. A writ application 

### arising in a criminal 

### proceeding is not the proper procedural vehicle to establish a 

### right to records under the Public Records Law, La. R. S. 44: 1, et 

### seq. 

### A person who wants to examine public records must make the request to the custodian of records. See La. R. S. 44: 31 & 44: 32. If a request for public records 

### is denied 

### by the custodian, before seeking relief from this court, the person must 

### first institute civil proceedings for a writ of mandamus at the 

### district court level. See La. R.S. 44: 35(A). Should the person prevail, 

## he should be preparedtopaythe regularservice fees 

### for copies of the documents. After the 

### district court rules 

## in the civil proceeding, the person may seek an appeal of the district court' s action, if he desires. See La. R. S. 

### 44: 35(0). See also State ex rel. McKnight v. State, 98-2258 La. 

### App. 1st Cir. 

### 12/03/98), 

### 742 So.2d 894, 895 ( per curiam). 

### We further note the records of the East Baton Rouge Parish Clerk of Court' s Office reflect that the 

### district court acted on 

## relator's request forpublicrecords onJanuary 19, 2022. PMc JEW MRT



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# 4 DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund I, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                      
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 20, 2010 |  | /s/ Crit S. DeMent                                   
|                   |  | Name: Crit S. DeMent                                 
|                   |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
STATE of North Carolina v. Teman Tavoi MCNEIL

No. 420P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Sean Paul Vitrano, Attorney at Law, Wake Forest, for McNeil, Teman Tavoi.

John H. Schaeffer, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of November 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 28th of November 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of December 2018 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
**Exhibit 31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**
 
 I, Ingo K. Kozak, the Vice President Finance & Administration and CFO, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Bio-Lok International Inc.; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, nor misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flow of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for the establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c)
disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
 b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and 
 ****Date: January 24, 2005

/s/ Ingo K. Kozak, VP - Finance and CFOSignature and Title 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8