alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 - Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)



                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Information Technology, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Gary Morgan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

        (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
              of 1934; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and
              result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gary Morgan
------------------------------
    Gary Morgan
    Chief Executive Officer


Date  November 24, 2003
      -----------------


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 49 (Monday, March 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5664]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting and Community Forum of the 
New Jersey Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, that a planning meeting and community forum of 
the New Jersey Advisory Committee will convene at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, 
May 8, 2009, at the Legislative Annex of the State House, 152 West 
State Street, Room L6 (first floor), Trenton, New Jersey 08625. The 
purpose of the planning meeting is to review the format for conducting 
the community forum. The purpose of the community forum is to discuss 
two topics: immigration and education. The immigration review will 
begin at approximately 9:30 a.m. The education review will begin at 
approximately 2 p.m.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
address is U.S. Comission on Civil Rights, Eastern Regional Office, 624 
Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to 
email their comments, present their comments at the meeting, or who 
desire additional information should contact Alfreda Greene, Secretary, 
at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6c3d4c9e6d3d5c5c5d488c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b5e49547b4e48585849155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, March 11, 2009.
Christopher Byrnes,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E9-5664 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4284

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus BOBBY LEON JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-01-210) Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 29, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolph M. Lee, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert James Conrad, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jennifer Marie Hoefling, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bobby Leon Johnson appeals the district court’s judgment sentencing him to 300 months in prison following his guilty plea to nine counts of an eleven-count indictment for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 922(g)(1), 924(c), 1951, 1956(h), and 2113 (2000). In his appeal, filed pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Johnson asserts there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Although concluding that such allegations lack merit, counsel asserts that Johnson’s plea was not knowing and voluntary. Johnson has been informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. Because our review of the record discloses no reversible error, we affirm Johnson’s conviction and sentence. Johnson was advised of the nature of the charges against him, the potential punishment, and the rights he was waiving by entering a plea of guilty, and he knowingly and intelligently waived those rights and pled guilty. Moreover, Johnson’s appellate waiver forecloses any argument that his sentence, issued under the mandatory guidelines system, was unconstitutional. SeeUnited States v. Blick , 408 F.3d 162 (4th Cir. 2005). In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Johnson’s convictions and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of- 3 - his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision process.

AFFIRMED
Laura Lynn SUTLIEF, Respondent, v. Martin Edward SUTLIEF, Appellant.

WD 81126

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: August 28, 2018

Martin E. Sutlief, Gladstone, Appellant pro se.

Andrea P. Bolstad, Liberty for respondent.

Before Division Two: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam

Martin Sutlief appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Laura Sutlief. He contends the circuit court's judgment was not final because the court failed to dispose of all of the marital property. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-78,594-02

EX P ARTE ADAM Z UNIG A, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2019-873-C1A IN THE 19T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM Mc LENNAN COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of stalking and sentenc ed to eig ht y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant filed t his application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On J u ne 9, 2020, the trial court enter ed an order desig nating issues. The habea s re co rd supplied to this Court, howeve r, contains no finding s resolving t he disputed fac tual issues. We

rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiar y investiga tion and make finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. The trial court shall make findings of fa ct and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’sfinding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Aug ust 19, 2020 Do not publish
Joseph C. HOLLIWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80707

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: May 29, 2018

Jeannie Willibey, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Gary D. Witt and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

**Order**

Per Curiam:

*453Mr. Joseph C. Holliway appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Mr. Holliway alleges that his conviction for first-degree involuntary manslaughter should be vacated because his guilty plea was not supported by an adequate factual basis. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5247 

To provide assistance for the Museum of the History of Polish Jews in 

Warsaw, Poland. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. LANTOS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

A BILL 

To provide assistance for the Museum of the History of 

Polish Jews in Warsaw, Poland. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support for the Mu5 seum of the History of Polish Jews Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Current and future generations benefit 

9 greatly by visible reminders and documentation of 

10 the historical and cultural roots of their society. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5247 IH 

1 (2) It is in the national interest of the United 

2 States to encourage the preservation and protection 

3 of artifacts associated with the heritage of United 

4 States citizens who trace their forbearers to other 

5 countries and to encourage the collection and dis6 semination of knowledge about that heritage. 

7 (3) According to the 2000 United States Cen8 sus, nearly 9,000,000 Americans are of Polish an9 cestry. 

10 (4) At the beginning of World War II, Poland 

11 had the largest Jewish population in Europe. 

12 (5) In 1996, Yeshayahu Weinberg, a founding 

13 director of Tel Aviv’s Diaspora Museum and the 

14 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, created 

15 an international team of experts with the goal of es16 tablishing a Museum of the History of Polish Jews. 

17 (6) The Museum of the History of Polish Jews 

18 will preserve and present the history of the Jewish 

19 people in Poland and the wealth of their culture 

20 spanning a period of one thousand years. 

21 (7) In 1997, the City of Warsaw donated a par22 cel of land, opposite the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising 

23 Memorial, for the explicit use for the Museum of the 

24 History of Polish Jews. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5247 IH 

1 (8) In 2005, the Government of Poland and the 

2 City of Warsaw agreed to provide 40,000,000 Polish 

3 zlotys for the construction of the Museum of the 

4 History of Polish Jews. 

5 (9) In 2005, an international architectural com6 petition selected a Finnish firm to design the build7 ing for the Museum of the History of Polish Jews. 

8 SEC. 3. ASSISTANCE FOR THE MUSEUM OF THE HISTORY 

9 OF POLISH JEWS. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Assistance provided by the Bu11 reau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the Depart12 ment of State shall be made available to assist in the de13 velopment of the permanent collection of the Museum of 

14 the History of Polish Jews. 

15 (b) AUTHORIZATION FOR ASSISTANCE.—To carry out 

16 the purposes of subsection (a), the Secretary of State is 

17 authorized to provide $5,000,000, which shall remain 

18 available until expended, to the Museum for the History 

19 of Polish Jews. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Bay View Capital Corporation listed below of our report dated January 26, 1998,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bay View Capital Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 1998:

Registration Statement No. 33-30602 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-30603 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-36161 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-41924 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-95724 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 33-95726 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-37027 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-37029 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-37031 on Form S-8
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-29757 on Form S-3
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-64877 on Form S-3


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
March 30, 1999
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, J. Russell Porter, President and Chief Executive Officer of Gastar Exploration Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certify that theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

I further certify that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:May 6, 2010
#### Jesse H. Livingston, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Decision filed April 27, 1928.

*Scofield & Scofield, S. W. Getzen*and *John W. Gideons,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Fred H. Davis,*Attorney General, and *H. E. Carter,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *848the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Strum, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 32




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Weston Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Yi Sen Wong, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
        of the Company.


By: /s/ Yin Sen Wong
-------------------------------------
Yin Sen Wong, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)


November 5, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.3

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-60621, 333-78673, 333-30402, 333-49098, and 333-49134 of Greka Energy
Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated March 27, 2003, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Greka Energy Corporation as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2002 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Greka Energy Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
March 27, 2003
Johnny KITTRELL, Respondent, v. TOWNSEND TREE SERVICE, Appellant.

No. ED 106390

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Filed: October 2, 2018

Daniel J. Walkenhorst, 906 Olive Street, Suite 400, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Respondent.

William Lemp, 8045 Big Bend Blvd., Suite 202, Webster Groves, MO 63119, For Appellant.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

In this worker's compensation case, Townsend Tree Service appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarding permanent and total disability benefits to claimant Johnny Kittrell. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(4).
#### Gershon Bassman et al., Appellants, v Blackstone Associates et al., Defendants, and Sterling National Bank, Respondent.

[718 NYS2d 826]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on or about July 25, 2000, which, in an action for fraud and misappropriation of investment monies, granted defendant-respondent’s motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ attorneys (F&J), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*281The motion court correctly held that the confidentiality provisions of the settlement agreement in another action in which F&J represented the plaintiffs prohibited F&J from accepting future representation of similarly situated plaintiffs. Such a prohibition is necessarily implicated in the agreement’s prohibition against disclosure of the settlement amount and any prior specific dollar amounts offered or demanded. As the motion court aptly put it, since it is not apparent how F&J “could use, yet somehow not reveal or give plaintiffs in this lawsuit access to,” such information, its confidentiality obligation “conflicts with its ability to freely contemplate settlement strategies” in this action. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.
ex10-29.htm


    Exhibit 10.29

    
 

    December
15, 2009

    


    Mike
Johnson

    Wachovia
Bank, N.A.

    Commercial
Lending Division, TN1008

    230
Fourth Avenue North, Eighth Floor

    Nashville,
Tennessee 37219

    


    Dear
Mike:

    


    Reference
is made to that certain Credit Agreement dated as of April 13, 2007 (the “Credit
Agreement”) by and between Astec Industries, Inc. (“Astec”) and Wachovia Bank,
National Association (the “Bank”).  Terms used herein and not defined
herein have their respective defined meanings as set forth in the Credit
Agreement.

    


    Pursuant
to the definition of “Line of Credit Loan Maturity Date” contained in the Credit
Agreement.  Astec hereby elects to extend the Line of Credit Loan
Maturity Date for a one-year period to May 15, 2012.

    


    Astec
hereby certifies to the Bank that, as of the date hereof, no Default or Event of
Default or Material Adverse Change has occurred or is continuing.

    


    I would
ask that the Bank kindly acknowledge such extension by signing the counterpart
of this letter at the space provided below.

    


    On behalf
of Astec, we appreciate a very professional and positive relationship that has
developed between our two institutions.

    


    Very
truly yours,

    


    ASTEC
INDUSTRIES, INC.

    


    /s/ F. McKamy
Hall        

    By:           F.
McKamy Hall

    V.P.,
C.F.O. & Treasurer

    


    


    Acknowledged
and agreed:

    


    WACHOVIA
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

    


    By: /s/Mike
Johnson                         

    Title: Senior Vice
President
Exhibit 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of NuVim,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  quarterly  period  ended  September  30,  2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"),
I, Richard P. Kundrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November __, 2006

/s/ Richard P. Kundrat
-----------------------
Richard P. Kundrat
Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bio-Lok International Inc.(the
Registrant) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September, 2003, hereof (the
Report), the undersigned officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Bio-Lok International Inc.

/s/ Bruce L. Hollander

Chief Executive Officer
February 2, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of East Kansas Agri-Energy,LLC (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William R. Pracht, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   | /s/ William R. Pracht    |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Chief Executive Officer  |
|   | Dated: November 13, 2006 |

 

----