alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The South Gifford Pinchot National Forest Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Monday, April 20, 2009, at the Columbia Gorge Riverside Lodge 200 SW Cascade Avenue, Stevenson, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 4 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to: Elect a chairperson and vice-chair, propose an indirect project percentage, receive an overview of Title II accomplishments, and make recommendations on approximately 60 proposals for Title II funding of projects under the Secure Rural Schools and County Self-Determination Act of 2000. 

All South Gifford Pinchot National Forest Resource Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The “open forum” provides opportunity for the public to bring issues, concerns, and discussion topics to the Advisory Committee. The “open forum” is scheduled to occur at 9:10 a.m. on April 20. Interested speakers will need to register prior to the open forum period. The committee welcomes the public's written comments on committee business at any time. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Roger Peterson, Public Affairs Specialist, at (360) 891-5007, or write Forest Headquarters Office, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 10600 NE. 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682. 

Dated: March 6, 2009. 

Janine Clayton, 

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. E9-5587 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Jamuahle D. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80607

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

ORDER FILED: July 3, 2018

Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

**ORDER**

Per curiam:

Jamuahle Brown ("Brown") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Pettis County, Missouri, denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction *150relief after an evidentiary hearing. Brown argues that the motion court erred in denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion because it violated his right to effective assistance of counsel since trial counsel failed to engage in additional cross-examination of one of the State's witness, Jennifer Reyburn ("Reyburn"). We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50083

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BRANDON LEE JAMES, also known as Brandon Lee Orenstein,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:10-CR-267-1

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Brandon Lee James appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed by the

district court following his conviction of one count of possession of an

unregistered firearm; the sentence was 15 months above the top of the applicable

guidelines range of 84-105 months of imprisonment. 

Following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), we review

sentences for reasonableness in light of the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519-20 (5th Cir. 2005). In

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 6, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50083 Document: 00511624544 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2011
No. 11-50083

so doing, we engage in a bifurcated review. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38,

49-51 (2007); United States v. Delgado-Martinez, 564 F.3d 750, 752 (5th Cir.

2009). We must first ensure that the sentencing court committed no significant

procedural error. Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. If there is no procedural error, we review

the substantive reasonableness of the sentence under a deferential abuse of

discretion standard, taking into account the totality of the circumstances. Id.;

United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008). 

Although James argues that the district court erred by taking into account

his extensive juvenile criminal history during sentencing, the district court was

free to do so. See United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 708-10 (5th Cir. 2006). 

The district court was in the best position to evaluate James’s history and

characteristics, as well as the need for the sentence imposed to deter him from

further criminal conduct and to protect the public from his future crimes, and its

decision is entitled to deference. See § 3553(a); Gall, 552 U.S. at 51-52; Smith,

440 F.3d at 708-10.

Further, the 15-month variance at issue is considerably less than other

sentences that this court has affirmed. See Smith, 440 F.3d at 708 n.5, 709-10

(upholding as reasonable variance from guidelines range maximum of 27 months

to 60 months); United States v. Smith, 417 F.3d 483, 492 (5th Cir. 2005)

(upholding departure from guidelines range maximum of 41 months to 120

months). That we “might reasonably have concluded that a different sentence

was appropriate is insufficient to justify reversal of the district court.” Gall, 552

U.S. at 51. 

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-50083 Document: 00511624544 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2011
EXHIBIT 99.1


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------


Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust, as Issuer
c/o Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee

Citibank (South Dakota), National Association, as Managing Beneficiary

We have examined the accompanying assertion made by Citibank South Dakota's
("CBSD") management on Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust's ("Issuer")
compliance with Article IX, Section 907 of the Indenture, dated as of September
26, 2000, between the Issuer and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee for the year
ended December 31, 2001. Management is responsible for the Issuer's compliance
with Article IX, Section 907 of the Indenture, including the accuracy of the
mathematical calculations of each amount set forth in the Issuer's Report,
delivered each month pursuant to Section 907, using CBSD's computer reports
which were the source of such amounts. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
management's assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based upon the stated criteria in the Indenture.


/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 20, 2002


<PAGE>


   Management Report on Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust's Compliance with
                    Article IX, Section 907 of the Indenture
                    ----------------------------------------


Citibank (South Dakota), National Association ("CBSD") is the Managing
Beneficiary of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust ("Issuer") and the Servicer
of Citibank Credit Card Master Trust I ("Master Trust").

Management of CBSD, as Managing Beneficiary of the Issuer and as Servicer of the
Master Trust, is responsible for the preparation of the Issuer's Report each
month in compliance with Article IX, Section 907 of the Indenture, dated as of
September 26, 2000, between the Issuer and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee.
Management is also responsible for the accuracy of the mathematical calculations
of each amount set forth in the Issuer's Report, delivered each month pursuant
to Section 907, using CBSD's computer reports which were the source of such
amounts.

Management has performed an evaluation of the Issuer's compliance with Article
IX, Section 907 of the Indenture, including the accuracy of the related
mathematical calculations, for year ended December 31, 2001. Based upon this
evaluation, management believes that, for the year ended December 31, 2001, the
Issuer was materially in compliance with Article IX, Section 907 of the
Indenture.



/s/ Kendall Stork
-----------------
Kendall Stork
President


March 20, 2002
Exhibit  32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Mason Hill Holdings, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for the year ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Geoffrey  Eiten,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Mason
Hill  Holdings,  Inc.,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)      the  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April  7,  2004

                                      /s/Geoffrey  Eiten
     Chief  Executive  Officer

                                      Geoffrey  Eiten
                                      Chief  Financial  Officer
EXHIBIT 99.4

   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Black Warrior Wireline Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald
Whitter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Ronald Whitter
---------------------------
Ronald Whitter
Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael A. Gerlich,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gastar Exploration Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 (the Report),
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 5, 2011



/s/ MICHAEL A. GERLICHMichael A. GerlichVice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sheri BIERMAN, Appellant, v. Kimmie VIOLETTE, Respondent.

No. ED 100946-01

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: August 21, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Eric O. Wolfgram, 462 N. Taylor, 3rd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63108.

FOR RESPONDENT: James G. Nowogrocki, 1015 Locust St., Ste. 400, St. Louis, MO 63101, Kathleen E. Mannion, 4600 Madison Ave., Ste. 810, Kansas City, MO 64112.

Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Sheri Bierman appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing her negligence action against her co-employee, Kimmie Violette, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC,
        the general partner of the Partnership

Date:	   August 12, 2009
exv10w6w6







Exhibit 10.6.6




	 	 	 
	 
	Notice of Grant of

	 	LSI CORPORATION
	Restricted Stock Unit Award

	 	ID: 94-2712976
	Under the

	 	1621 BARBER LANE
	LSI Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan

	 	MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA 95035
	 
	 
	 	 
	GRANTEE NAME

	 	Award Number:
	Address

	 	Grant Date:
	Address

	 	Number of Restricted
	 

	 	Stock Units:
	 




On the grant date shown above, LSI Corporation granted you the number of restricted stock units
shown above under the LSI Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan. If and when it vests, each
restricted stock unit entitles you to receive one share of LSI common stock. We typically will
withhold some of the shares you would receive when the restricted stock units vest to satisfy
applicable tax or similar withholding obligations.



Your award will vest according to the vesting schedule shown below. Vesting will occur only if [any
applicable performance requirements indicated below have been met and] you have not incurred a
Termination of Service prior to the vesting date.




	 	 	 
	Shares
	 	Vesting Date
	 
	 	 





 





By your signature below, you agree that this award is governed by this Notice of Grant, the
attached Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and the LSI Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan. You
acknowledge that you have received, read and understand this Notice of Grant, the attached
agreement and the plan. You agree to accept as binding all decisions or interpretations of the
Board of Directors of LSI or its delegate regarding any questions relating to the plan, this Notice
of Grant or the attached agreement.




 




	 	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 

GRANTEE NAME

	 	 
	Date:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 28, 2014

No. 04-14-00282-CV

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On May 23, 2014, real party in interest A.L.F.L. filed a motion suggesting that 

intervening actions by the trial court in the underlying divorce proceeding have rendered this 

original mandamus proceeding and the relief conditionally granted by this court moot. This court 

is of the opinion that the issue raised by the motion requires further consideration. The 

respondent judge and the relator, The State of Texas, may file a response to the motion in 

this court no later than June 2, 2014. The court requests that any response address whether 

or not the trial court’s actions and order signed May 16, 2014, render the issues raised and 

addressed in this mandamus proceeding moot. Any such response must conform to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on May 28th, 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI02421, styled A.L.F.L. v. K.L.L., pending in the 438th Judicial 

District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe presiding.
#### Fred SAWYER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 9824.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1965.

Decided May 20, 1965.

Arnold Fleischmann, Towson, Md. (Court-assigned counsel), for appellant.

Paul M. Rosenberg, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Thomas J. Kenney, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BRYAN, Circuit Judge, and LEWIS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

For violations of the Federal narcotic laws, 26 U.S.C. §§ 4705(a), 4704(a), 7237(a) and 7237(b), appellant Fred Sawyer was found guilty and sentenced to five years imprisonment by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 1962. In 1964 he moved to vacate the sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The grievances assigned in the motion relate to the procedure and the rulings of the trial court on the hearing of Sawyer’s motion for a new trial. Our consideration of the record and the arguments of counsel, on brief and orally, discloses no error in the District Court’s decision to deny the § 2255 motion.

Affirmed.
Daniel M. SCHAEFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 105563

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Filed: June 19, 2018

Amy E. Lowe, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Daniel M. Schaefer ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Zeynep
Hakimoglu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
ClearOne Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of ClearOne Communications, Inc.
  
 Date:  October
      14, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Zeynep HakimogluZeynep
      HakimogluPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5497 

To limit the reduction in the number of personnel of the Air Force Space 

Command, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Ms. HARMAN (for herself and Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To limit the reduction in the number of personnel of the 

Air Force Space Command, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON REDUCTION IN PERSONNEL OF 

4 AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND. 

5 (a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

6 may not reduce the number of military personnel, civilian 

7 employees, or contractor support personnel assigned to the 

8 Air Force Space Command, or any component of the Air 

9 Force Space Command, from the number of such per10 sonnel or employees assigned to the Air Force Space ComVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:31 Jun 01, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5497.IH H5497

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5497 IH

1 mand as of January 1, 2006, until the Secretary submits 

2 to the relevant congressional committees the report de3 scribed in subsection (b). 

4 (b) REPORT.—The report described in this subsection 

5 is a report that includes the following: 

6 (1) A description of the proposed reduction in 

7 the number of military personnel, civilian employees, 

8 or contractor support personnel, as the case may be, 

9 assigned to the Air Force Space Command. 

10 (2) A justification for the proposed reduction. 

11 (3) An assessment of the effect of the proposed 

12 reduction on the capacity of the Air Force Space 

13 command to conduct its mission in support of oper14 ational commanders. 

15 (4) An assessment of whether the impact of the 

16 proposed reduction could be mitigated by granting 

17 the commander of Air Force Space Command, or 

18 the appropriate program executive officers, greater 

19 flexibility in making personnel and resource deci20 sions to implement the proposed reduction. 

21 (5) A certification that the proposed reduction 

22 will not impede, disrupt, or otherwise diminish or 

23 interfere with the national security space acquisition 

24 programs of the United States, national security 

25 space operations of the United States, or national 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5497 IH

1 security space technology development by the United 

2 States. 

3 (c) RELEVANT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE4 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘relevant congressional 

5 committees’’ means— 

6 (1) the Select Committee on Intelligence, the 

7 Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee 

8 on Appropriations of the Senate; and 

9 (2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intel10 ligence, the Committee on Armed Services, and the 

11 Committee on Appropriations of the House of Rep12 resentatives. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS