alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHARLESTON.

#### State *v.*W. L. Rhome

(No. 6734)

Submitted November 18, 1930.

Decided November 25, 1930.

*Everett F. Moore,*and *McCamic & Clarice*and *Jay T. Mc-Camic,*for plaintiff in error.

Litz, Judge:

The defendant, W. L. .Rhome, was fined and sentenced to twelve months in jail upon conviction for' perjury under sections 1 and 2, chapter 147, Code 1923, providing: * ‘ If a person to whom an oath is lawfully administered on any occasion shall, on such occasion-, wilfully swear falsely touching any material matter or thing, he shall be guilty of perjury; * * *. Any person who commits or procures another person to commit perjury, shall, if the perjury be on trial for felony, be confined in the penitentiary -not less than one nor more than ten years; *and if it be on any other occasion, be confined in jail one year and be fined not exceeding one thousand dollars.”*

On April 15, 1929, Chester A. Burks, a justice of the peace of Marshall County, rendered judgment against Rhome in favor of Laura V. Simpson for $271.27 in the trial of an action under a distress warrant for rent theretofore issued for her benefit and levied upon his household effects, and directed the sheriff to sell the property distrained to satisfy the judg*725ment. Two days later, Rhome executed and delivered to the sheriff and exemption list purporting to set forth all “money," bonds, bills, notes, claims and demands” belonging to him of the value of $101.25 as exempt from execution or other process, under sections 23 and 24, chapter 41, Code 1923.

The charge of perjury against the defendant is predicated solely upon the omission from the exemption list of a claim against the state of Marshall County for fees due him as a constable of said county amounting to $146.50; the existence of which he had disclosed to Mrs. Simpson prior to the issuance of the distress warrant. Before executing the exemption list, he consulted Judge J. Howard Holt, a reputable attorney of Moundsville, who advised him that it would not be necessary to include this claim and referred him to John M. Fitzsimmons, another attorney, who was also a notary public. Rhome then consulted Fitzsimmons who prepared the list and administered the oath for a fee of five dollars. In view of the facts stated, the evidence does not warrant the finding that the defendant willfully omitted the constable fees from the exemption list.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed, the verdict set aside and a new trial awarded.

*Reversed <md rema/nded.*
STATE of North Carolina v. Tyrone Churell DAVIS

No. 239P19

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, For Davis, Tyrone Churell

Tamara S. Zmuda, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina

James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, For State of North Carolina *840***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of June 2019 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tara Monique TAYLOR, Appellant.

WD 80339

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: May 29, 2018

Christian Lehmberg, Columbia for appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

**ORDER**

Per Curiam

Tara Monique Taylor appeals from her convictions for felony child abuse and second-degree child endangerment. Taylor contends the circuit court erred in admitting evidence of uncharged misconduct. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our *828decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report  of the  Fund on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended
     September 30, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.



Date:  November 10, 2003




                                     /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                     -------------------------
                                     Michelle A. Alexander
                                     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 7
 
 Exhibit 7
UNAUDITED COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(1)2008 2007 2006 2005
£m £m £m £m
Financing costs per Consolidated Income Statementm 2,014 1,612 1,120 880
One third of rental expense 387 340 323 303
      
Fixed charges(2)2,401 1,952 1,443 1,183
      
Profit/(loss) before taxation from continuing operations 9,001 (2,383) (14,853) 7,285
Share of profit in associated undertakings (2,876) (2,728) (2,428) (1,980)
Fixed charges 2,401 1,952 1,443 1,183
Dividends received from associated undertakings 873 791 835 1,896
Preference dividend requirements of a consolidated subsidiary (65) (69) (74) (71)
      
Earnings 9,334 (2,437) (15,077) 8,313
      
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 3.9 7.0
Deficiency between fixed charges and earnings (4,389) (16,520)
Notes:
1. All of the financial information presented in this exhibit is unaudited.
2. Fixed charges include (1) interest expensed (2) amortised premiums, discounts and capitalised
expenses related to indebtedness, (3) an estimate of the interest within rental expense, and
(4) preference security dividend requirements of a consolidated subsidiary. These include the
financings costs of subsidiaries and joint ventures.
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P. III
                             (A Limited Partnership)


                                 EXHIBIT [32.1]


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing Tax
Credits L.P. III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


                                  /s/Jenny Netzer
                                  Jenny Netzer
                                  Executive Vice President
                                  MMA Financial, LLC

                                  Date:  June 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with AmendmentNo. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of United Wisconsin GrainProducers, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2004 (the“Report”), I, Robert J. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |             /s/  Robert J. Miller |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert J. Miller                                                                                   |
|   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer                                                              |
|   | Dated:  March  24, 2004                                                                  |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael T. Solomon, Chief Executive Officer of MTS, Incorporated, (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

(1)     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this
        certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
        with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.

Dated:  November 5, 2002                      /s/  Michael T. Solomon
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Michael T. Solomon
                                            Chief Executive Officer



                                       73
Exhibit 32.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jacinta Sit, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's
knowledge:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



/s/ Jacinta Sit
------------------------------------
Jacinta Sit, President
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)


September 11, 2006
No. 1076, Misc.

#### Donnell *v.*Missouri.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.
CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER, et al.

369PA18-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 7, 2019

Blake W. Thomas, Deputy General Counsel, Raleigh, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Solicitor General, Raleigh, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Michael Crowell, Attorney at Law, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

Deborah R. Stagner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

Elizabeth L. Troutman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for N.C. School Boards Association.

Jill R. Wilson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for N.C. School Boards Association.

Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy, for N.C. School Boards Association.

Ryan Y. Park, Deputy Solicitor General, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Joseph A. Newsome, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Department of State Treasurer, et al.

Lindsey V. Smith, Attorney at Law, for Cabarrus County Board of Education.

*644The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of August 2019 by North Carolina School Board Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of August 2019."
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jamie L. RUBOTTOM, Defendant/Appellant.

No. ED 106218

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: November 13, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Nancy A. McKerrow, 1400 Forum Blvd., Suite 1C #203, Columbia, MO 65203.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Evan Joseph Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, 221 West High St., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

*918Jamie L. Rubottom ("Defendant") appeals from the Judgment upon her conviction following a bench trial for one count of driving while intoxicated ("DWI") in violation of Section 577.010 RSMo 20001 , one count of failure to drive on the right half of the roadway in violation of Section 304.015, and one count of failure to display headlights in violation of Section 307.040. On the DWI charge, the trial court sentenced Defendant to four years of imprisonment, suspended execution of the sentence, and placed Defendant on probation for five years; it imposed two $100 fines on the remaining counts. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2882] 
          - March 6, 2009. 

A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by March 27, 2009. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired. 

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Flexible Use of the 896-901 MHz and 935-940 MHz Band Allotted to the Business and Industrial Land Transportation Pool (WT Docket No. 05-62),                 

Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band on Certain Part 90 (WT Docket No. 02-55), Consolidating the 800 MHz and 900 MHz Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool Channels. 

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-5397 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 32.2


                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requrities and Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company



                                          PACIFIC STATE BANCORP
                                          Date: August 12, 2005

                                          BY: /s/ JOANNE ROBERTS
                                              --------------------------------
                                              JoAnne Roberts
                                              Senior Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

                                       30
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.1350)

 

Theundersigned executive officer of Minden Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | /s/ A. David  Evans |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Name:               | A. David  Evans |
|   | Title:              | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date:  May 14, 2003

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act has been providedto Minden Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Minden Bancorp, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Kevin B. HAIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80832

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: July 31, 2018

Damien S. De Loyola, for Appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

*799Kevin B. Haight appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he sought to vacate his conviction and sentence for forcible rape ( § 566.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2010) on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 23.4

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

Sproule  Associates Limited hereby consents to being named in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year eneded  December 31, 1999,  which report will upon its
filing be incorporated by reference in GREKA Energy  Corporation's  registration
statements on Form S-3 (File Nos 333-60621 and 333-78673) and Form S-8 (File No.
333-30402).  We confirm that we have read excerpts  from the draft  document and
that we have no reason to believe that there are any  misrepresentations  in the
information  contained  therein  that is derived  from our reserve  report as of
January 1, 2000.

/s/ Sproule Associates Limited
------------------------------
 Sproule Associates Limited



May 1, 2000
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. for the interim period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.

Dated:  June 5, 2006

 

/s/ Barry Lamperd                              

Barry Lamperd

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and will be retained by Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PETER SHUMLIN Governor

StateofVermont 

### OFFICEOFTHEGOVERNOR January 15,2014
Gina McCarthy, Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy, I formally request that the Environmental Protection Agency nominate the Jard site, located in Bennington, Vermont, to the National Priorities List (NPL) ofSuperfund sites. The serious nature ofthe contamination issues at and emanating from the site warrants its inclusion on the NPL. NPL listing for the Jard site has received support from the Town ofBennington. Based on the support from the Town ofBennington and the recommendation ofthe Vermont Agency ofNatural Resources, I support the listing ofthe Jard site onthe NPL at the earliest possible time. Thank you for your consideration ofthis request. Please feel free to contact me ifyou have any questions or comments.

Pe er Shumlin Governor Cc: Jim Wool!(Jrd, Director, Office ofSuperfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI) Curt Spaulding, Regional Administrator, EPA New England Jim Owens, Director, Office ofSiteRemedia(ion and Restoration, EPA New England Deborah Markowitz, Secretary, Vermont Agency ofNatural Resources David Mears, Commissioner, Vermont Department ofEnvironmental Conservation Stu Hurd, Manager, Town ofBennington Joseph Krawcyk, Jr., Chair, Bennington Select Board
109 STATE STREET 

### + THE PAVILION t MONTPELIER, VT 05609-0101 

### + WWW.VERMONT.GOV TELEPHONE: 802.828.3333 

### + FAX: 802.828.3339 

### + TDD: 802.828.3345