alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony Bonelli,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                                     /s/ ANTHONY BONELLI
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Anthony Bonelli
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     May 22, 2006

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optigenex Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Zwiren,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Optigenex Inc. and will be retained by Optigenex Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                                     /s/ DANIEL ZWIREN
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Daniel Zwiren
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     May 22, 2006
Exhibit 32.1



                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification is
included  solely for the purpose of complying with the provisions of Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act and is not to be  used  for any  other  purpose.  In
connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Rub A Dub
Soap, Inc. for the quarter ended November 30, 2006, I, Kevin Halter, Jr., hereby
certify  in my  capacity  as an  officer  of Rub A Dub  Soap,  Inc.  that  to my
knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Rub A Dub Soap, Inc. for the quarter
     ended November 30, 2006,  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Rub A
     Dub Soap, Inc. for the quarter ended November 30, 2006, fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Rub A Dub Soap, Inc.



Date:  December 21, 2006             /s/ Kevin Halter, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Kevin Halter, Jr., President,
                                    Treasurer and Director (Principal
                                    Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128672 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128672 COA: 258799 Saginaw CC: 01-020393-FC MANUEL VICTOR GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 6, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,083              10,696,630
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         21,027,263              14,266,512
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,143,346              24,963,142
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     116,083                 577,737
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,027,263              24,385,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,143,346              24,963,142
<TRADING-REVENUE>                            (805,664)               1,582,333
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           204,729                 537,761
<COMMISSIONS>                                  351,493                 922,012
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,507,765               2,237,941
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,507,765               2,237,941
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,507,765               2,237,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    15.32                   19.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    15.32                   19.17
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 15.2**

----

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-81825 on Form S-8 and in Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-110941 on Form F-3 of Vodafone Group Plc, of our report dated February 22, 2007 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” on January 1, 2006) relating to the  consolidated financial statements of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Vodafone Group Plc for the year ended March 31, 2007.

Deloitte & Touche LLP  New York, New York  June 11, 2007

----
exv10waa








Exhibit 10(aa)




Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Wachovia Corporation



Effective as of June 1, 2009, the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of
Wachovia Corporation was amended to add a new Section 4(e) to read as follows:





4(e). Notwithstanding any language in Sections 4 and 5 to the contrary, those Directors who
were in service as a Director of Wachovia Corporation as of December 31, 2008 but who were
not elected to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of Wells Fargo & Company
effective January 1, 2009 (collectively the “Non-Continuing Directors”) may make a one-time
irrevocable election to have all or any part of the balance credited to such Non-Continuing
Director’s Interest Account or Stock Account, as applicable, transferred to a Stock Account
or Interest Account, as applicable. Such election shall not alter in any way the deferral
election made by the Non- Continuing Director under Section 3(a), the distribution election
made by such Non- Continuing Director under Section 5(a) or the deemed distribution election
described in Section 5(b) in the event that the Non- Continuing Director failed to make a
distribution election pursuant to Section 5(a). Such election shall be made in the time and
manner prescribed by the Executive Compensation division of Human Resources and shall be
effective June 1, 2009.
NO. 07-02-0022-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	SEPTEMBER 16, 2002

	______________________________

	HORACE CHESTER, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;

	NO. 82603; HONORABLE LARRY GIST, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and JOHNSON, JJ., AND BOYD, S.J.1

	Appellant Horace Chester has given notice of appeal from a conviction and sentence in Cause No. 82603 in the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas (the trial court), for possession of a controlled substance.  The appellate court clerk has received and filed the trial court clerk’s record and the trial court reporter’s record.  Appellant has been previously granted an extension of time to file his brief.  By letter dated August 19, 2002, the appellate clerk advised counsel for appellant that appellant’s brief was due on July 15, 2002, and that neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time for filing of the brief had been received.  Counsel for appellant was further advised by such letter that if no response to the letter was received by August 30, 2002, the appeal would be abated to the trial court for hearing pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b).  No response to the clerk’s letter of August 19th has been received.

	Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2).  Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant’s present counsel should be replaced; and  (2) what orders, if any, should be entered to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued.  If the trial court determines that the present attorney for appellant should be replaced, the court should cause the clerk of this court to be furnished the name, address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the newly-appointed or newly-retained attorney.  

	The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and file appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations, and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record; (3) cause the hearing proceedings to be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter’s record; (4) have a record of the proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the supplemental clerk’s record or the supplemental reporter’s record; and (5) cause the records of the proceedings to be sent to this court.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).  In the absence of a request for extension of time from the trial court, the supplemental clerk’s record, supplemental reporter’s record, and any additional proceeding records, including any orders, findings, conclusions and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be received by the clerk of this court not later than October 16, 2002. 	

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Attachment 008 – TS1201UC – Environmental Fate of UltraC

1 of 2 pages

Sanitized
Attachment 008 – TS1201UC – Environmental Fate ULTRAC

2 of 2 pages

sanitized
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
I, William C. Kurtz, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MonarchCommunity Bancorp, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have;
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 15, 2004 By:  /s/ William C. Kurtz    William C. Kurtz    Senior Vice President and Treasurer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barrie B. Campbell, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 191]

Mercure, J. P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered September 14, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the second degree.

Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the second degree. At the time of sentencing, County Court conducted a hearing pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), required defendant to register as a sex offender and provided defendant with the risk assessment instrument it used to calculate his risk of repeat offender level, i.e., a level 3 sexually violent predator, having a high risk of repeat offense. Defendant now appeals, challenging only the risk level designation made by County Court.

We agree with the People’s assertion that defendant has no *716right to appeal the propriety of the risk level designation ássigned to him by County Court. Notably, the Court of Appeals has held that a risk level determination made by a sentencing court prior to January 1, 2000 “is not independently appeal-able from the criminal judgment of conviction” and the fact' that the designation may have been made “contemporaneously with the criminal judgment does not change [that] governing principle” *(People v Kearns,*95 NY2d 816, 817-818; *see, People v Hernandez,*93 NY2d 261, 270 [distinguishing between sex offender certification, which is appealable, and risk level assessment, which is not appealable]).

Here, defendant challenges neither his conviction for rape in the second degree made pursuant to his guilty plea nor his certification as a sex offender. Rather, his sole appeal is from County Court’s manner of conducting and the scoring of his risk level assessment. In our view, the fact that defendant’s challenge is based on an alleged denial of due process rather than a mere miscalculation does not render the issue appeal-able. We also note that defendant in any event failed to preserve his due process challenge for our consideration by timely raising it in County Court *(see, People v Gonzalez,*54 NY2d 729, 730).

Based upon our conclusion that defendant has not presented an appealable issue, County Court’s judgment should be affirmed.

Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-11825, 33-88156, 33-51056, 33-36787, 33-25897, 33-62807,
333-35487, 333-65567, 333-80453, 333-5406, 333-5408) pertaining to the Amended
and Restated 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated 1984
Stock Option Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated
1992 Stock Option Plan, the Gasonics International Corporation 1994 Stock Option
/ Stock Issuance Plan, and Gamma Precision Technology 1998 Stock Option Plan of
our report dated January 15, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Novellus Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.



                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
March 23, 2001

                                       78
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5540 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5540

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
217 Southeast 2nd Street in Dimmitt, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Jacob Dan 
                          Dones Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT JACOB DAN DONES POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 217 Southeast 2nd Street in Dimmitt, Texas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Jacob Dan Dones Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Jacob Dan Dones Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```