alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13**

----

RULE 13A-14(B) CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vodafone Group Plc, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 March 2007**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| 14 June 2007 | /s/ Andy Halford        |
|--------------|-------------------------|
| Date         | Andy N. Halford         |
|         | Chief Financial Officer |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

----

RULE 13A-14(B) CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vodafone Group Plc, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 March 2007**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| 14 June 2007 | /s/ Arun Sarin  |
|--------------|-----------------|
| Date         | Arun Sarin      |
|         | Chief Executive |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Boyd Douglas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Darrell
G. West, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ J. Boyd Douglas                                 
|                   |  |  |  | J. Boyd Douglas                                     
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Darrell G. West                                 
|                   |  |  |  | Darrell G. West                                     
|                   |  |  |  | Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.25


 


Hittite Microwave Corporation


Non-Employee Director Compensation
Plan


 


Directors who are our
employees receive no separate compensation for their services as directors. Our
non-employee directors receive cash fees and equity-based compensation in the
form of awards under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as follows:


 


·                  each non-employee director receives an
annual cash fee in the amount of $15,000;


·                  our lead director receives an additional
cash fee in the amount of $20,000;


·                  the chairperson of each of our board
committees receives an additional cash fee as follows: audit committee chair,
$10,000; compensation committee chair, $8,000; and nominating committee chair,
$8,000; and


·                  each other member of a board committee
receives an additional annual cash fee of $8,000.


 


The cash fees described
above are paid quarterly in arrears. Non-employee directors are also reimbursed
upon request for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection
with their attendance at meetings of the board and of committees on which they
serve.


 


In addition, each
non-employee director who is first elected to the board or who is elected to an
additional one-year term at any annual meeting of stockholders, will upon such
election receive a restricted stock award of a number of shares of our common stock,
fixed on the date of grant, that has a fair value on the date of grant equal to
$61,500. Each such restricted stock award will vest on the earlier of the first
anniversary of the date of grant or the date of the next annual meeting of
stockholders, subject to partial acceleration in the event of a change in
control.
Exhibit 23.2


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
 333-71077 and 333-106878 on  Form S-3, and  Nos. 333-73391, 333-106880,  and
 333-106881 on Form S-8 of our reports, dated March 10, 2005, relating to the
 financial  statements  of  First  Cash  Financial  Services,  Inc.,  and  to
 management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over  financial
 reporting, appearing  in this  Annual  Report on  Form  10-K of  First  Cash
 Financial Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 Hein & Associates LLP
 Dallas, Texas
 March 10, 2005
* Theappelleewasnotservedwithprocessinthedistrictcourtandisnot

participatinginthisappeal.Afterexaminingthebriefsandtherecord,wehaveconcluded

thatoralargumentisunnecessary.Thus,theappealissubmittedonthebriefsandthe

record.SeeFED. R. APP. P.34(a)(2).

**Richardshasalreadychallengedthisbankruptcypetitionseveraltimes.See

Richardsv.Stevens,310F.App’x898(7thCir.2009);Richardsv.HSBCTech.&Servs.USA,

Inc.,303F.App’x356(7thCir.2008);Richardsv.Stevens,299F.App’x579(7thCir.2008).

United States Court of Appeals

FortheSeventhCircuit

Chicago,Illinois60604

SubmittedJune24,2009*

DecidedJune24,2009

BytheCourt:

No.084193

TERENCEBRUCERICHARDS,

PlaintiffAppellant,

v.

JAMESE.STEVENS,

DefendantAppellee.

AppealfromtheUnitedStatesDistrict

CourtfortheNorthernDistrictofIllinois,

EasternDivision.

No.07C1907

MatthewF.Kennelly,

Judge.

ORDER

Inthelatestchallengetohisbankruptcycase,**TerenceRichardssuedthetrustee,

JamesStevens,forhisroleinhavingRichards’sbankruptcydismissed.Thedistrictcourt

dismissedthecomplaintbecauseRichardsdidnotseekpermissionfromthebankruptcy

courtbeforesuingthetrustee.SeeInreLinton,136F.3d544,545(7thCir.1998).Richards

filedanappealfromthatdecision,butwedismisseditforfailuretopaythedocketingfee.

FourteenmonthslaterRichardsaskedthedistrictcourttovacateitsdismissalunderFederal

NONPRECEDENTIALDISPOSITION

Tobecitedonlyinaccordancewith

Fed.R.App.P.32.1
No.084193 Page2

RuleofCivilProcedure60(b)(4)onthegroundthatthedecisionwasvoid.Thedistrictcourt

deniedthatrequest,andRichardsnowappeals.

Rule60(b)(4)isintendedforcaseswherethedistrictcourtissuingtheunderlying

judgmentlackedjurisdictionoractedinamannerinconsistentwithdueprocess.Marquesv.

Fed.ReserveBankofChi.,286F.3d1014,1018(7thCir.2002);RobinsonEng’gCo.PensionPlan

&Trustv.George,223F.3d445,448(7thCir.2000).Onappeal,Richardsraisesnochallenge

basedonjurisdictionordueprocess,andinsteadattackstheunderlyingdismissalofhis

complaint.ButRule60(b)isnotapermissiblesubstituteforappealingthejudgment,see,

e.g.,Bellv.EastmanKodakCo.,214F.3d798,80001(7thCir.2000),andthetimetopursuean

appealhaslongpassed.Accordingly,thejudgmentis

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5409 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5409

   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to require that the 
 Commissioner of Social Security notify individuals of improper use of 
                 their social security account numbers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2006

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to require that the 
 Commissioner of Social Security notify individuals of improper use of 
                 their social security account numbers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Number Fraudulent 
Use Notification Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS OF IMPROPER USE OF THEIR SOCIAL 
              SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS.

    Section 205(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(I) In any case in which the Commissioner of Social Security 
determines that--
            ``(i) the social security account number in the wage 
        records provided to the Social Security Administration by an 
        employer with respect to any employee does not match relevant 
        records otherwise maintained by the Social Security 
        Administration, or
            ``(ii) the social security account number issued to an 
        individual has otherwise been used by any other person in a 
        fraudulent or otherwise illegal manner,
the Commissioner shall promptly provide the individual (if any) to whom 
such social security account number was issued with written 
notification of the Commissioner's determination.''.
                                 <all>
```
<page>								EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   March 30, 2004        /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman
                               	   Jeffrey A. Rothman
                               	   President,
	   Demeter Management Corporation,
	   general partner of the
		registrant
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLWY-957400-09-L14200000-BJ0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plats of survey, Nebraska.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to file the plat of survey of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 5353 Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was executed at the request of the National Park Service and is necessary for the management of these lands. The lands surveyed are:

The plat representing the entire record of the survey of Tract No. 37, Township 32 North, Range 3 East, of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Nebraska, was accepted March 6, 2009.

Copies of the preceding described plat are available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

Dated: March 6, 2009.

John P. Lee,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.

 [FR Doc. E9-5354 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4467-22-P
Casitdel WOOTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 105915

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: September 11, 2018

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM.

*522Casitdel Wooten appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 29.15 (2015) after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).
Exhibit 21


                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                              December 31, 2003

                              CNB BANCORP, INC.
                      10-24 N. Main Street, P.O. Box 873
                         Gloversville, New York 12078
                                      |
                                      |
                                      |
                                      |
                                      |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY                 HATHAWAY AGENCY, INC.
 10-24 N. Main Street, P.O. Box 873                    7 Church Street
    Gloversville, New York 12078                 Gloversville, New York 12078
    ----------------------------                 ----------------------------
           (100% Owned)                                   (100% Owned)
                |
                |
                |
                |
                |
          CNB REIT CORP.
 10-24 N. Main Street, P.O. Box 873
    Gloversville, New York 12078
    ----------------------------
           (100% Owned)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________ No. 00-30867

____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
EDWARD JOHN FLUNKER,
Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CR-75-1-N August 13, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Loc. R. 47.6.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 11397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5736]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11643 and <greek-i>11644]


Kentucky Disaster Number KY-00019

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kentucky 
(FEMA-1818-DR), dated 02/05/2009.
    Incident: Severe winter storm and flooding.
    Incident Period: 01/26/2009 through 02/13/2009.
    Effective Date: 03/09/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/06/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/05/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for private non-profit organizations in the State of 
Kentucky, dated 02/05/2009, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Boone, Casey, Gallatin, Hancock, Henry, Kenton, 
Simpson, Taylor, Wolfe, Trimble

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-5736 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 13372 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

CAROLYN L. CRITTENDON, 

Claimant and Appellant, 

CITY OF BUTTE, Employer and 

STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, ) 

Defendant and Respondent. 

Appeal from: Workers' Compensation Court 

William E. Hunt, Judge 

Counsel of Record: 

For Appellant: 

Burgess, Joyce, Prothero, Whelan and O'Leary, 

Butte, Montana 

Frank Burgess argued, Butte, Montana 

For Respondent : 

Thomas Reegan argued, Helena, Montana 

Submitted: January 12, 1977 

Decided : 

Filed: JAN 2 0 1977 
Mr. Justice Frank I. Haswell delivered the Opinion of the Court. 

Claimant, a meter maid for the City of Butte, was injured on January 16, 1973, when a parking violator drove his 

Volkswagen over her left foot while being ticketed. The Workers1 

Compensation Court granted claimant an 8% permanent partial 

disability as compared to amputation of the foot at the ankle 

following a hearing on January 20, 1976. Claimant appeals. 

At issue is the sufficiency of the evidence to support 

the disability rating. 

Dr. Charles R. Canty, an orthopedic surgeon and claimant's 

treating physician, testified that " * * * there would be perhaps 

a slight permanent partial impairment of the function of her 

foot, ankle, leg as a result of the accident." but declined to 

fix the percentage of disability because he had not seen claimant 

for almost three years. Dr. Philip A. Blom, a chiropractor who 

examined claimant in December, 1973, testified that claimant had 

suffered a 23% permanent partial impairment to the foot and ankle 

based upon the guidelines of the Manual for Orthopedic Surgeons 

in the Rating of Physical Impairment. 

We hold that testimony indicating " * * * perhaps a slight 

permanent partial impairment of function * * *" does not support 

a fixed percentage rating at any figure. Converting such testimony into a percentage disability rating is pure speculation for 

obvious reasons. Accordingly, we vacate the 8% permanent partial 

disability rating and the resulting monetary award. 

Neither can we sustain claimant's contention that the only 

remaining evidence is the 23% rating of Dr. Blom which must be 

accepted. Dr. Blom's testimony is inherently self-contradictory. 

After testifying that he used the guidelines of the Manual for 

Orthopedic Surgeons in the Rating of Physical Impairment - which 
uses range of motion and atrophy as the rating criteria, he 

testified that the "Range of motion of the ankle was within 

normal means * * *" and that he found no fibrotic condition 

or osteoarthritis in the foot and ankle. The Workers' Compensation Court rejected the rating of Dr. Blom by its findings. 

The credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given 

their testimony is exclusively for the trier of the facts. 

Bender v. Roundup Mining Co., 138 Mont. 306, 356 P.2d 469; Dean 

v. Anaconda Co., 135 Mont. 13, 335 P.2d 854. 

This case is remanded to the Workers' Compensation Court 

for a hearing and determination of the degree of permanent 

partial disability and the amount of compensation payable to 

claimant. 

Justice 

chief Justice r\, L'