alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017348EN.01000202.xml

| 17.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8460 — Peugeot/BNP Paribas/Opel Vauxhall Fincos)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 348/04)

On 8 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8460. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8460. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Patricia J. IRETON, Respondent, v. Stanley C. IRETON, Appellant.

No. ED 105394

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Filed: December 12, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 30, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 3, 2018

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Michele Hammond, 1360 South Fifth Street, Suite 269, St. Charles, MO 63301.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: David L. Baylard, 30 South McKinley Street, Union, MO 63084.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

**ORDER**

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Ireton appeal from the judgment denying his motion to set aside the default judgment entered against him on Patricia Ireton's petition for dissolution. The respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. There was no abuse of discretion here, and we affirm.

*354An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward Earl JONES

No. 255P18

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2019

Brendan O'Donnell, Assistant Public Defender, For Jones, Edward Earl

Jeremy D. Lindsley, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For State of North Carolina

Jennifer Harjo, Public Defender, For Jones, Edward Earl

Jon David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 13th of August 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of August 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of August 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2019."
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Billy RABUN, Appellant.

No. ED 105161

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

FILED: June 5, 2018

FOR APPELLANT: Danelle C. Duffy, 231 S. Bemiston Ave., Suite 800, Clayton, Missouri 63105.

For Respondent: JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Garrick Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM

Billy Rabun ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of the class A felony of assault in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.050 (RSMo. 2000 ), and the unclassified felony of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 (RSMo. 2000 ). Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender, pursuant to Section 558.016 (RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2008) to two current terms of 30 years' imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  August 13, 2007

 

/s/ Barry Lamperd                                            

Barry Lamperd

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal 

Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larneal D. DAVIS, Appellant.

WD 80407

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Order filed: February 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 22, 2018

Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, for Appellant.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge, and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

***ORDER***

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial, Larneal Davis ("Davis") was convicted in the Circuit Court of Jackson County of involuntary manslaughter, leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident, and driving while his license was revoked or suspended. He was found by the trial court to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced. Davis appeals, alleging errors relating to the admission of blood samples and the separation of a juror during deliberations. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5401 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5401

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend section 308 of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Bicentennial 
    Commemorative Coin Act to make certain clarifying and technical 
                              amendments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lewis and Clark Commemorative Coin 
Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. LEWIS AND CLARK COMMEMORATIVE COIN AMENDMENTS.

    Section 308 of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Bicentennial 
Commemorative Coin Act (31 U.S.C. 5112 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Secretary as 
        follows:'' and all that follows through the end of the 
        subsection and inserting the following:
 ``Secretary for expenditure on activities associated with 
commemorating the bicentennial of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, as 
follows:
            ``(1) National council of the lewis and clark 
        bicentennial.--\1/2\ to the National Council of the Lewis and 
        Clark Bicentennial.
            ``(2) Missouri historical society.--\1/2\ to the Missouri 
        Historical Society.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(b) Transfer of Unexpended Funds.--Any proceeds referred to in 
subsection (a) that were dispersed by the Secretary and remain 
unexpended by the National Council of the Lewis and Clark Bicentennial 
or the Missouri Historical Society as of June 30, 2007, shall be 
transferred to the Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation for the 
purpose of establishing a trust for the stewardship of the Lewis and 
Clark National Historic Trail.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5401

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend section 308 of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Bicentennial 
    Commemorative Coin Act to make certain clarifying and technical 
                              amendments.
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We  have  issued  our  report  dated  August  5,  2006,   accompanying  the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Vasomedical,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May
31, 2006. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in
the Registration  Statements of Vasomedical,  Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-3
(File No. 333-127752,  effective August 22, 2005, File No. 333-34044,  effective
April 12, 2000,  File No.  333-60341,  effective  December  28,  1998,  File No.
333-33319, effective August 21, 1997, and File No. 33-62329, effective September
18, 1995) and on Forms S-8 (File No.  333-86152,  effective April 12, 2002, File
No. 333-42692,  effective August 1, 2000, File No.  333-85457,  effective August
18, 1999, File No.  333-85455,  effective  August 18, 1999, File No.  333-60471,
effective August 3, 1998, File No. 333-11579,  effective September 6, 1996, File
No. 333-11581,  effective  September 6, 1996, and File No. 333-11583,  effective
September 6, 1996).

/s/  Miller Ellin & Company, LLP
MILLER ELLIN & COMPANY, LLP

New York, New York
August 25, 2006
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67530-67531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26901]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8946]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picturing Mary: Woman, Mother, Idea'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as

[[Page 67531]]

appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Picturing Mary: Woman, Mother, Idea,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the National Museum of Women in 
the Arts, Washington, DC, from on or about December 5, 2014, until on 
or about April 12, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 4, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-26901 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ajmal Juara, Appellant.

[719 NYS2d 102]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), rendered March 23, 1999, convicting him of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, incest, sexual abuse in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discre*480tion in the interest of justice, by vacating the conviction of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that his convictions for incest, sexual abuse in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child should be vacated because the unsworn testimony of the infant victim was not corroborated by independent evidence *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Bynum,*70 NY2d 858, 859; *People v Finder,*199 AD2d 544). In any event, it is without merit.

However, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [3]), the conviction for course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree should be vacated. Pursuant to Penal Law § 130.75 (a), “[a] person is guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree when, over a period of time not less than three months in duration, he or she engages in two or more acts of sexual conduct, which includes at least one act of sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse or aggravated sexual contact, with a child less than eleven years old.” The defendant correctly argues, and the People do not contest, that there was no evidence adduced at trial regarding the time period over which the sexual abuse of the subject child was said to have occurred. Accordingly, the conviction of that crime must be vacated and that count of the indictment dismissed. Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
AMENDMENT TO MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES SENIOR EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN



 Exhibit 10.31 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.

 SENIOR EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) desires to amend the Marsh & McLennan
Companies, Inc. Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan (the “Plan”) to specify the determination of a pro-rata bonus for a participant who may be subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and

 WHEREAS, Section 7.02 of the Plan provides that the Compensation Committee may amend the Plan and on November 18,
2009, the Compensation Committee (i) approved certain amendments to the Plan (the “Committee Approval”); and (ii) authorized MMC management to effect such amendments to the Plan (the “Authority to Amend”);

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Committee Approval, the Authority to Amend and additional general and specific corporate authority
for these matters, the Vice President of Corporate Human Resources is authorized to make the desired amendments to the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendments are adopted and approved, effective December 31, 2009: 
 Section 2.01 is hereby
amended by deleting the words “Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer” and inserting the words “Vice President, Head of Employee Relations” in their place. 
 Section 5.04(a)(ii) is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof: 
 provided that, the pro-rata bonus for any Participant who is a member of the MMC Executive Committee at any point during the year in which
his or her Termination Date occurs (i) shall be determined by prorating (x) an amount determined based on the degree of achievement of goals at year-end under the bonus program in effect on the Participant’s Termination Date, except
that should any goals be of a subjective nature, the degree of achievement thereof shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion or (y) if a Change in Control has occurred, the Participant’s target annual bonus
for the calendar year in which the Participant’s Termination Date occurs; (ii) shall be payable at the same time as annual bonuses for the year are paid to the Company’s senior executives generally and in no event later than
March 15 of the year following the year in which the Termination Date occurs; and (iii) shall not exceed the amount calculated for such Participant under the MMC Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan; and 
 Section 9.01 is hereby amended by (i) deleting the words “Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer” wherever they appear and,
in each case, inserting the words “Vice President, Head of Employee Relations” in their place and (ii) deleting the words “Change in Control Separation Benefits Plan” and inserting the words “Senior Executive Severance
Pay Plan” in their place. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Leon J. Lichter, in his capacity as Vice President of Corporate Human
Resources, has executed these amendments on December 29, 2009. 
  

	
	 /s/ Leon J. Lichter

	Leon J. Lichter
	Vice President of Corporate Human Resources
Copy of the Fourth Amendment of the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit (10)i(8) 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT 
 OF THE 
 STEPAN COMPANY 2006 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Stepan Company (the “Company”) has established and maintains the Stepan Company 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section 5.8 by action of the Board of Directors; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to change the amount of stock options granted to a Non-Employee Director;

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that effective January 1, 2010, the Plan is amended as follows: 
 1. By deleting the first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 
 “As of the date of the annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders in each of calendar years 2006, 2008, 2009 and each calendar
year thereafter during the term of the Plan, each Non-Employee Director serving as a Director of the Company on such date shall automatically be awarded a Stock Option to purchase the number of shares of Stock determined by dividing (i) for calendar
years beginning prior to January 1, 2009, the annual retainer fee payable to the Non-Employee Director for such calendar year, (ii) for the calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2009, $25,000, by the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock as
of such annual meeting date, and (iii) for calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, $30,000, by the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock as of such annual meeting date.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officer of the Company has executed this Fourth Amendment of the Plan on behalf of the Company
and has caused its corporate seal to be affixed this 19th
day of October, 2009. 
  

			
	STEPAN COMPANY
		
	By	 	/s/ Greg Servatius
	Its	 	VPHR


  

			
	ATTEST
		
	By	 	/s/ Sheila M. Crockett
	Its	 	Total Rewards Supervisor

  

 5
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

d1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139482

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139482 COA: 283951 Saginaw CC: 07-028679-FH CHARLES LEQUETTE HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
QUALITY BUILT ADVANTAGE, INC., Plaintiff, v. Pam GRAHAM, Defendant.

No. COA18-1230

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 6, 2019

AFFIRMED IN PART. DISMISSED IN PART.