Mineral Wool Cupola 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Isolatek International 

Huntington Plant 

701 North Broadway Street 

Huntington, Indiana 

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

December 6, 2010 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1

 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the cupola baghouse (SV 

#1) located at the Isolatek International (Isolatek) site in Huntington, Indiana: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

• Carbon monoxide and carbonyl sulfide 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the 

overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

ii

Table I 

Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 < 1.0E-01 1.3E-02 8.1E-01 

Organic 

Condensible PM2.5

 5.7E-01 7.9E-02 4.5E+00 

Inorganic 

Condensible PM2.5

 2.0E+00 2.6E-01 1.6E+01 

Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 26 

& 27, 2010 

Total PM2.5 < 2.7E+00 3.5E-01 2.1E+01 

Filterable 

Particulate < 3.4E-01 4.1E-02 2.7E+00 

Antimony < 9.2E-05 1.1E-05 7.3E-04 

Arsenic 1.4E-04 1.7E-05 1.1E-03 

Beryllium < 1.5E-05 1.8E-06 1.2E-04 

Cadmium 3.2E-05 3.6E-06 2.5E-04 

Chromium 5.2E-05 6.0E-06 4.1E-04 

Cobalt 3.2E-05 3.8E-06 2.5E-04 

Lead 5.7E-04 6.8E-05 4.5E-03 

Manganese 3.1E-03 3.7E-04 2.5E-02 

Nickel < 8.1E-05 9.5E-06 6.4E-04 

Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 27 

& 28, 2010 

Selenium 3.3E-03 4.0E-04 2.6E-02 

Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 26, 

2010 Mercury 2.5E-04 4.0E-06 2.5E-04 

Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 27 

& 28, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium < 1.4E-05 1.7E-06 1.1E-04 

Hydrogen 

Chloride Cupola 5.4E-02 6.5E-03 4.2E-01 

Exhaust 

October 27, 

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride 6.1E-02 7.2E-03 4.7E-01 

Cupola Carbon Monoxide 1.9E+03 2.8E+02 1.5E+04 

Exhaust 

October 26, 

2010 Carbonyl Sulfide 1.9E+01 2.7E+00 6.8E+01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions.
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 1

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 2 

3.2 PM AND PM2.5 CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................................... 3 

3.3 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 3 

3.4 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 4 

3.5 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 4 

3.6 HF AND HCL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................... 4 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 1

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Emissions Test Program Summary 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 8 - Method 318 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Production Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 

Appendix F – Method 320 Analytical Report 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3

 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the cupola baghouse (SV 

#1) located at the Isolatek International (Isolatek) site in Huntington, Indiana: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on 

October 26, 27, and 28 2010. The test program consisted of triplicate emission tests at one 

exhaust stack for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program 

included the personnel summarized by Table 1. 

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Thomas Snyder BTEC 

Barry Boulianne BTEC 

Matthew Young BTEC 

Paul Molenda BTEC 

Barbara White Isolatek 

2.0 Process Description

The Isolatek facility in Huntington includes two coke-fired cupolas used to melt slag and rock 

and form it into slag wool used in the manufacture of fire-resistant materials. Exhaust from both 

cupolas, as well as exhaust from the raw material receiving and weighing operations, is routed to 

a single Cupola Baghouse #1 (CE #1). 

The stack serving Cupola Baghouse #1 (SV #1) is round and 40 inches in diameter at the test 

location. The stack is equipped with two emission test ports, each four inches in diameter. 

Testing was conducted from a stack platform located approximately fifty feet above the ground 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

2

level. Exhaust gas temperatures during the testing period averaged 200oF. The Isolatek facility 

in Huntington is located at 701 North Broadway in Huntington, Indiana. 

 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program, both cupolas were operated at normal production rates. In 

addition to total production for each test run, process operating data recorded at 5-minute 

intervals during the emissions test program included (1) baghouse operating temperature, (2) 

baghouse pressure drop, (3) particle detector reading, and (4) baghouse fan amperage. Process 

production data is available in Appendix B. Control equipment data will be available to U.S. 

EPA on request. 

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into 

seven categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates; and, 

(7) Measurement of exhaust gas carbon monoxide (CO) and carbonyl sulfide (COS) 

concentrations and emission rates. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.7, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

Method 1: “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

Method 2: “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

Method 3A: “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions 

from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

Method 4: “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, 

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sampling methodologies. 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

3

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with 

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to 

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions was within specified limits, therefore, a 

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) was assigned. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O2 content of the 

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer (or equivalent) 

and the CO2 content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments 

(CAI0 600 Series CO2 gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sample of the gas stream was 

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe with an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any 

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of 

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second 

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A schematic drawing of the emission 

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger). 

3.2 PM and PM2.5 Concentrations and Emission Rates 

PM/PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test 

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM2.5, and CPM concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM10 particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM2.5

particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a glass 

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample 

line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC 

water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, and the fifth impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the PM2.5/CPM sample 

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM faction was collected on the front half of 

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP. 

3.3 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a 

heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, 

and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. 

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid 

(HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

4

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals 

sampling train is provided as Figure 4. 

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon 

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case 

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty 

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica 

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5. 

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a 

glass probe liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length 

of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the 

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 

sampling train is provided as Figure 6. 

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 

3.7 CO and COS Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of CO and COS concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 63, Appendix A, Method 318. Stack exhaust gas was continually purging 

through the sampling system and the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. The 

sample gas was extracted from the stack using a heated, stainless steel probe, maintained at 

191°C. A heated filter box (191°C) connected the probe to the filter assembly and to a heated 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

5

transfer line. A 0.1μ glass filter was used for particulate matter removal. A heated, diaphragm 

pump was used to pull the sample from the stack. The expected flow rate is 8 to 10 liters per 

minute.

The heated transfer line, held at 191°C, connected the probe/filter assembly to the FTIR. The 

FTIR was equipped with a temperature-controlled, 5.11 meter multipass gas cell maintained at 

191°C. Gas flows and sampling system pressures were monitored using a rotometer and 

pressure transducer. 

FTIR data was collected using an MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR spectrometer. All data was 

collected at 0.5cm-1 resolution. Each sample spectrum was derived from the co-addition of 60 

scans, with a new data point generated every one minute. Figure 8 provides an illustration of the 

Method 318 sample train. 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

1

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2. 

Table 2 

Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 < 1.0E-01 1.3E-02 8.1E-01 

Organic 

Condensible PM2.5

 5.7E-01 7.9E-02 4.5E+00 

Inorganic 

Condensible PM2.5

 2.0E+00 2.6E-01 1.6E+01 

Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 26 

& 27, 2010 

Total PM2.5 < 2.7E+00 3.5E-01 2.1E+01 

Filterable 

Particulate < 3.4E-01 4.1E-02 2.7E+00 

Antimony < 9.2E-05 1.1E-05 7.3E-04 

Arsenic 1.4E-04 1.7E-05 1.1E-03 

Beryllium < 1.5E-05 1.8E-06 1.2E-04 

Cadmium 3.2E-05 3.6E-06 2.5E-04 

Chromium 5.2E-05 6.0E-06 4.1E-04 

Cobalt 3.2E-05 3.8E-06 2.5E-04 

Lead 5.7E-04 6.8E-05 4.5E-03 

Manganese 3.1E-03 3.7E-04 2.5E-02 

Nickel < 8.1E-05 9.5E-06 6.4E-04 

Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 27 

& 28, 2010 

Selenium 3.3E-03 4.0E-04 2.6E-02 

Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 26, 

2010 Mercury 2.5E-04 4.0E-06 2.5E-04 

Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 27 

& 28, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium < 1.4E-05 1.7E-06 1.1E-04 

Hydrogen 

Chloride 5.4E-02 6.5E-03 4.2E-01 Cupola 

Exhaust 

October 27, 

2010 Hydrogen 

Fluoride 6.1E-02 7.2E-03 4.7E-01 

Cupola Carbon Monoxide 1.9E+03 2.8E+02 1.5E+04 

Exhaust 10/26/2010 

Carbonyl Sulfide 1.9E+01 2.7E+00 6.8E+01 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Isolatek International BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 6, 2010 

1

Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process 

production data is included in Appendix B. Field and computer-generated data sheets are 

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes 

laboratory analytical reports. Appendix F includes the Method 318 analytical report. 

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Isolatek International. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s consent 

except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent 

performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with 

the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential 

damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

David Center 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
FIGURES 
diameter = 40"

Points Distance "

12 0.8

11 2.7

10 4.7

9 7.1

8 10.0

7 14.2

6 25.8

5 30.0

4 32.9

3 35.3

2 37.3

1 39.2

Figure 1

Site:

Isolatek International

Huntington, Indiana

Cupola Baghouse

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

> 14.5"

 > 58"
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 2

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Isolatek International

Huntington, Indiana

Cupolas

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

Environics Gas 

Dilution System

M&C Model 100-L

O2 Analyzer

CAI Series 600

CO2 Analyzer

pump

tedlar 

bag
Figure 3

Site:USEPA OTM27/28Isolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaCupolas

BT Environmental Consult2615 Wolcott Michigan

Silica gel

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

45mm Filter Housing

Verticle Condenser Filter Holder W/ Tef

Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H2O
Figure No. 4

Site:USEPA Method 5/29Isolatek InternationalHuntington, Indiana

BT Environmental Cons2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner & nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution Empty Silica Gel
Figure 5

Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainIsolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaCupola Baghouse

BT Environmental Cons2615 Wolcott Ferndale, Michigan 482

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 6

Site:USEPA Method 0061Isolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaCupola Baghouse

BT Environmental Cons2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Perastaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empty

Figure 7

Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainIsolatek InternationalHuntington, IndianaCupola Baghouse

BT Environmental Cons2615 Wolcott Michigan

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 100 mL 0.1N H2SO4 
heated sample line

Figure 8

Site:

USEPA Method 318

Isolatek International

Huntington, Indiana

Cupolas

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration and Tracer Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

MKS MultiGas 2030 

FTIR spectrometer
APPENDIX A 

Detailed Test Run Results 
Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010

Start Run Start Time 8:10:00 13:25:00 10:40:00

Run Finish Time 12:56:14 17:37:14 14:15:52

Net Traversing Points 16 16 16

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 211.51 211.13 210.4 211

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 0.994 1.000

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.41 29.41 29.74 29.52

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.33 0.33 0.39 0.35

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 84.080 83.290 81.270 82.880

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.13 80.59 70.72 77.48

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 80.952 80.269 79.962 80.394

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 38 40 33 37.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.79 1.88 1.55 1.74

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.2 2.3 1.9 2.1

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.978 0.977 0.981 0.979

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 2.90 2.8 2.2 2.6

%O2 Oxygen, % 18.1 17.4 18.5 18.0

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79 79.8 79.3 79.4

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.19 29.14 29.09 29.14

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.95 28.89 28.88 28.91

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.32 29.32 29.65 29.43

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 221 229 205 218

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.806 1.800 1.788 1.798

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 86.4 86.9 84.6 85.9

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 33,293 33,580 34,113 33,662

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 45,391 45,146 44,191 44,910

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 116.5 116.7 113.9 115.7

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Filterable PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 1.62 1.76 2.18 1.85

Cmg/dscm Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 7.1E-01 7.7E-01 9.6E-01 8.1E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.9E-02 9.7E-02 1.2E-01 1.0E-01

Elb/ton product Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Organic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 13 14 4 10.3

Cmg/dscm Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 5.7E+00 6.2E+00 1.8E+00 4.5E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.1E-01 7.7E-01 2.3E-01 5.7E-01

Elb/ton product Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 28 42 38 36

Cmg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E+01 1.8E+01 1.7E+01 1.6E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E+00 2.3E+00 2.1E+00 2.0E+00

Elb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Total PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 42.6 57.8 44.2 48.2

Cmg/dscm Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E+01 2.5E+01 2.0E+01 2.1E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E+00 3.2E+00 2.5E+00 2.7E+00

Elb/ton product Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Isolatek International 10-3990.16

Huntington, IN

Source Cupola Exhaust

Personnel MY
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 3 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/27/2010 10/28/2010 10-28-10

Start Run Start Time 15:14:00 8:11:00 11:54:00

Run Finish Time 18:33:00 11:49:00 16:32:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.74 30.02 30.02 29.93

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.85 1.88 2.03 1.92

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 146.132 143.712 148.140 145.995

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 85.33 64.00 65.32 71.55

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 141.705 146.399 150.585 146.230

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 40 43 49 44.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.88 2.02 2.31 2.07

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.4

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.987 0.986 0.985 0.986

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 3.3 2.4 1.6 2.4

%O2 Oxygen, % 17.0 18 19 18.0

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7 79.6 79.4 79.6

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.21 29.10 29.02 29.11

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.06 28.95 28.85 28.95

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -1.2 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.65 29.93 29.93 29.84

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 199 181 173 184

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.608 1.650 1.720 1.659

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 79.6 79.3 80.6 79.8

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 33,751 32,661 34,668 33,693

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 41,496 41,677 42,199 41,791

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.2 100.2 100.2 100.2

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 11.8 5.0 16.4 11.1

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 2.9 1.2 3.8 2.7

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.36 0.15 0.50 0.34

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 2.0 3.7 3.4 3.0

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 5.0E-04 8.9E-04 8.0E-04 7.3E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.1E-05 1.1E-04 1.0E-04 9.2E-05

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 3.5 5.1 5.5 4.7

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 8.7E-04 1.2E-03 1.3E-03 1.1E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-04 1.5E-04 1.7E-04 1.4E-04

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05 1.5E-05

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 1.5 0.75 0.82 1.0

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 3.8E-04 1.8E-04 1.9E-04 2.5E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.7E-05 2.3E-05 2.5E-05 3.2E-05

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 1.86 1.56 1.66 1.7

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.6E-04 3.8E-04 3.9E-04 4.1E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.7E-05 4.8E-05 5.1E-05 5.2E-05

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.74 1.17 1.23 1.0

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E-04 2.8E-04 2.9E-04 2.5E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E-05 3.6E-05 3.7E-05 3.2E-05

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 10 23 23 18.7

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E-03 5.5E-03 5.4E-03 4.5E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-04 7.0E-04 7.0E-04 5.7E-04

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 99.9 79.6 125.9 101.8

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E-02 1.9E-02 3.0E-02 2.5E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.0E-03 2.4E-03 3.8E-03 3.1E-03

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.7

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 6.2E-04 7.2E-04 5.9E-04 6.4E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.6E-05 9.1E-05 7.6E-05 8.1E-05

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 86.7 87.0 153 108.9

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.2E-02 2.1E-02 3.6E-02 2.6E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.6E-03 2.7E-03 4.7E-03 3.3E-03

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Isolatek 10-3990.16

Huntington, IN

Source Cupola Exhaust

Personnel TS
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

Guardian Fiberglass Albion Michigan Electric Melt Furnaces SVMELT6,7,9 Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data F

BDL

1 10/26/2010 8:30 10/26/2010 11:41 1.88E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2 10/26/2010 11:53 10/26/2010 11:53 1.49E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 3 10/26/2010 14:35 10/26/2010 16:40 4.00E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Em

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

QA/QC Documentation

Process 

Production Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volum

Differenc

2.2 2.9 18.1 45146 33580 216.04

R1, A 26.2 0.84 27.04 0 27.04 0.14 

2.2 2.9 18.1 45146 33580 208.54

R2, A 20.4 0.94 21.34 0 21.34 0.14 

2.3 2.8 17.4 45391 33293 232.50

R3, A 55.4 2.45 57.85 0 57.85 0.14 

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Trap #1

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Concentration 

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C

0.19

R1, B 46.7 0.78 47.48 20 27.48 0.14 0% 2

0.3

0.1 28 

0.15

R2, B 31.7 1.02 32.72 10 22.72 0.14 0% 3

0.2

0.1 21 

0.40

R3, B 74.8 3.12 77.92 20 57.92 0.14 0% 4

0.5

0.1 15 

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) 

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1

μg/dscm

Page 3 of 3 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/27/2010 10/28/2010 10/28/10

Start Run Start Time 15:14:00 8:11:00 11:54:00

Run Finish Time 18:33:00 11:30:00 16:32:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.175 0.175 0.175 0.175

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.994 0.994 0.994 0.994

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.74 30.02 30.02 29.93

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.26 1.30 1.34 1.30

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 124.700 123.750 124.960 124.470

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 77.73 57.13 58.29 64.38

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 121.352 126.415 127.376 125.048

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 49 75 74 66.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.31 3.53 3.48 3.11

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.9 2.7 2.7 2.4

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.981 0.973 0.973 0.976

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 3.3 2.4 1.6 2.4

%O2 Oxygen, % 17.0 18 19.0 18.0

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7 79.6 79.4 79.6

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.21 29.10 29.02 29.11

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.00 28.80 28.72 28.84

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -1.2 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.65 29.93 29.93 29.84

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 195 176 170 181

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.619 1.690 1.694 1.667

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 79.7 80.1 79.8 79.9

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 33,887 32,646 34,035 33,523

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 41,951 41,655 41,725 41,777

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.0 101.5 101.5 101.4

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-04 1.1E-04 1.1E-04 1.1E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.4E-05 1.4E-05 1.4E-05 1.4E-05

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Isolatek 10-3990.16

Huntington, IN

Source Cupola Exhaust

Personnel MY
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/27/2010 10/27/2010 10-27-10

Start Run Start Time 10:01:00 11:19:00 13:13:00

Run Finish Time 11:10:00 13:04:00 14:55:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64 64

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.196 0.196 0.196 0.196

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.74 29.74 29.74 29.74

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 2.29 2.28 2.31 2.29

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 52.282 52.545 53.979 52.935

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 71.84 79.06 83.81 78.24

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 52.039 51.600 52.549 52.063

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 19 18 17 18.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 0.89 0.85 0.80 0.85

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.983 0.984 0.985 0.984

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 2.2 2.2 2.7 2.4

%O2 Oxygen, % 18.5 18.5 17.7 18.2

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.3 79.3 79.6 79.4

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.09 29.09 29.14 29.11

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.91 28.97 28.93

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -1.2 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.65 29.65 29.65 29.65

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 194 208 201 201

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.794 1.800 1.797 1.797

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 84.0 85.0 84.4 84.5

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 34,305 34,598 34,459 34,454

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 44,530 43,969 44,218 44,239

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.0 97.9 99.3 98.4

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 550 810 500 620

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 3.7E-01 5.5E-01 3.4E-01 4.2E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.8E-02 7.1E-02 4.3E-02 5.4E-02

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 510 700 870 693

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 3.5E-01 4.8E-01 5.8E-01 4.7E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.5E-02 6.2E-02 7.5E-02 6.1E-02

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Isolatek 10-3990.16

Huntington, IN

Source Cupola Ex

Personnel TS
Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

Isolatek Internation Huntington Indiana Cupolas 1 and 2 Cupolas 1 and 2

Measured Value 

(ppm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(ppmvd at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 318) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments

Run 1 10/26/2010 9:48 10/26/2010 10:48 12489 NA wet Method 318 ADL 1863.91 14,491 2.2 2.9 18.1 451

Run 2 10/26/2010 11:21 10/26/2010 12:21 13003 NA wet Method 318 ADL 1933.32 15,088 2.3 2.9 17.4 452Run 3 10/26/2010 12:42 10/26/2010 13:42 13704 NA wet Method 318 ADL 2029.84 15,901 2.3 2.8 18.5 453

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue 

Flow 

(ac

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Process 

Production 

Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Test End Time

Carbon Monoxide Emission Test Results

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Isolatek Method 318 Sheet CO Emission Data-318 
Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

Isolatek Internation Huntington Indiana Cupolas 1 and 2 Cupolas 1 and 2

Measured Value 

(ppm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(ppmvd at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 318) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments

Run 1 10/26/2010 9:48 10/26/2010 10:48 53.1 NA wet Method 318 ADL 17.00 62 2.2 2.9 18.1 45Run 2 10/26/2010 11:21 10/26/2010 12:21 58.1 NA wet Method 318 ADL 18.53 67 2.3 2.9 17.4 452Run 3 10/26/2010 12:42 10/26/2010 13:42 64.4 NA wet Method 318 ADL 20.46 75 2.3 2.8 18.5 453

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue 

Flow 

(ac

Process 

Production 

Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Test End Time

Carbonyl Sulfide Emission Test Results

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Isolatek Method 318 Sheet COS Emission Data-318 
APPENDIX B 

Production Data 
APPENDIX C 

Field and ComputerGenerated 

Data Sheets and Notes 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 5ftE Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company Isolatek International DGM # MB5 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 16

Location Huntington, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 13.22Source Cupola Exhaust Delta ∆H@ 1.53 Date 10/26/10 Time/reading 13.22Operator MY Bws (%) 2.16 # of Ports 2 Total Run min 211.51Filter Number Condensate Volume 14 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.32Barometric 29.41 Silica Gel Weight Gain 24 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.41 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.125 O2 (%) 18.10 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00009 CO2 (%) 2.90 Md 29.19 Stack Area (sf) 8.71

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.95 Act. Flow (cfm) 45,146 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 80.64 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 158.6 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 34,322

Moisture % 2.17 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 33,580

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments:

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

8 0.0 13.6 8:10 681.68 1.90 245 74 74 0.32 0.309 2

7 13.6 26.4 8:23 686.89 1.70 264 79 76 0.29 0.309 26 26.4 40.3 8:36 691.74 2.00 206 78 78 0.34 0.294 25 40.3 53.5 8:50 697.03 1.80 209 80 78 0.31 0.349 24 53.5 66.7 9:03 702.44 1.80 218 81 79 0.31 0.346 23 66.7 79.5 9:16 707.56 1.70 217 83 80 0.29 0.338 22 79.5 92.7 9:29 712.66 1.80 218 84 81 0.31 0.339 21 92.7 105.9 9:42 718.07 1.80 207 84 81 0.31 0.339 2

1 105.9 119.1 11:11 723.46 1.80 218 84 81 0.31 0.339 22 119.1 132.3 11:24 728.91 1.80 207 84 81 0.31 0.339 23 132.3 145.9 11:38 734.30 1.90 220 82 82 0.33 0.350 24 145.9 159.5 11:51 739.78 1.90 224 84 81 0.33 0.338 25 159.5 172.7 12:04 744.99 1.80 219 83 81 0.31 0.333 26 172.7 185.5 12:17 750.12 1.70 220 87 82 0.29 0.338 27 185.5 198.3 12:30 755.48 1.70 216 85 83 0.29 0.343 28 198.3 211.5 12:43 760.55 1.80 222 84 82 0.31 0.342 2

211.5 12:56 765.76

Average: 84.08 1.81 220.6 82.3 80.0 0.31 0.33 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 5ftE Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company Isolatek International DGM # MB5 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 16 0.00 @15" 0.0

Location Huntington, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 13.2

Source Cupola Exhaust Delta ∆H@ 1.53 Date 10/26/10 Time/reading 13.2Operator MY Bws (%) 2.3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 211.1Filter Number Condensate Volume 2 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.32Barometric 29.41 Silica Gel Weight Gain 38 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.41 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.125 O2 (%) 17.40 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00009 CO2 (%) 2.8 Md 29.14 Stack Area (sf) 8.71

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.89 Act. Flow (cfm) 45,391 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 79.96 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 158.3 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 34,074

Moisture % 2.30 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 33,293

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

8 0.0 13.6 13:25 766.02 1.90 214 81 81 0.32 0.343 2

7 13.6 26.8 13:52 771.38 1.80 197 79 81 0.30 0.343 26 26.8 40.7 14:06 776.50 2.00 191 77 77 0.34 0.361 25 40.7 53.9 14:35 782.15 1.80 215 77 77 0.30 0.365 24 53.9 66.7 15:03 787.34 1.70 225 77 74 0.29 0.340 23 66.7 79.5 15:16 792.32 1.70 216 85 75 0.29 0.328 22 79.5 92.4 15:29 797.29 1.70 226 85 75 0.29 0.337 21 92.4 105.6 15:42 802.35 1.80 230 86 75 0.30 0.328 2

6 105.6 118.4 15:52 807.39 1.70 226 85 75 0.29 0.337 25 118.4 131.6 16:05 812.71 1.80 230 86 75 0.31 0.328 24 131.6 145.2 16:19 818.05 1.90 245 83 78 0.32 0.324 24 145.2 158.7 16:32 823.49 1.90 238 85 78 0.32 0.312 25 158.7 172.3 16:45 828.65 1.90 244 86 79 0.32 0.318 26 172.3 185.1 16:58 833.76 1.70 254 87 80 0.29 0.313 27 185.1 198.3 17:11 838.93 1.80 255 88 82 0.30 0.319 28 198.3 211.1 17:24 844.07 1.70 263 88 82 0.29 0.305 2

211.1 17:37 849.31

Average: 83.29 1.80 229.3 83.4 77.8 0.30 0.33 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 5ftE Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port Start Finish Pre P

Company Isolatek International DGM # MB4 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 16 0.00 @15" 0.00

Location Huntington, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 13.2

Source Cupola Exhaust Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 13.2Operator MY Bws (%) 1.9 # of Ports 2 Total Run 210.4Filter Number Condensate Volume 9 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.65Barometric 29.74 Silica Gel Weight Gain 24 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 29.74 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.125 O2 (%) 18.50 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00009 CO2 (%) 2.2 Md 29.09 Stack Area (sf) 8.71

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.88 Act. Flow (cfm) 44,191 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 79.65 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 157.8 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 34,776

Moisture % 1.91 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 34,113

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

8 0.0 12.8 10:40 313.72 1.70 204 61 61 0.33 0.385 2

7 12.8 25.7 10:52 318.43 1.70 195 64 62 0.33 0.385 26 25.7 38.9 11:05 323.18 1.80 195 65 63 0.35 0.396 25 38.9 52.1 11:18 328.12 1.80 198 69 65 0.35 0.397 23 52.1 65.6 11:32 333.18 1.90 194 70 66 0.37 0.395 24 65.6 79.5 11:45 338.41 2.00 198 72 68 0.39 0.4 2

5 79.5 93.1 11:59 343.83 1.90 215 73 69 0.37 0.397 2

6 93.1 105.9 12:13 349.02 1.70 219 74 70 0.33 0.378 2

1 105.9 119.5 12:31 354.00 1.90 215 73 69 0.37 0.397 22 119.5 132.3 12:43 359.01 1.70 219 74 70 0.33 0.378 23 132.3 145.1 12:56 364.09 1.70 221 73 72 0.33 0.374 24 145.1 158.0 13:09 369.19 1.70 211 76 73 0.33 0.374 25 158.0 171.2 13:23 374.36 1.80 204 77 74 0.35 0.386 26 171.2 184.4 13:36 379.55 1.80 203 77 74 0.35 0.394 27 184.4 197.6 13:49 384.81 1.80 198 78 76 0.35 0.411 28 197.6 210.4 14:03 389.95 1.70 190 79 76 0.33 0.403 2

210.4 14:15 394.99

Average: 81.27 1.79 204.9 72.2 69.3 0.35 0.39 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 4ft - A Pollutant Metals Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Isolatek DGM # 3 Method 29 Total Points 16 0.002 @15" 0.00 @8"

Location Huntington, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 12.0

Source Cupola Exhaust Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 10/27/10 Time/reading 4.0Operator TS Bws (%) 1.31 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 4 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.65Barometric 29.74 Silica Gel Weight Gain 36 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.74 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.19 O2 (%) 17 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00020 CO2 (%) 3.3 Md 29.21 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 29.06 Act. Flow (cfm) 41,677 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 140.64 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 33,095

Moisture % 1.32 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 32,661

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 15:14 636.35 1.60 189 81 81 1.82 1.84 250 

1 4.0 8.0 15:18 639.51 1.60 191 83 81 1.82 1.84 248 1 8.0 12.0 15:22 642.45 1.60 190 85 81 1.82 1.85 249 2 12.0 16.0 15:26 645.52 1.55 188 86 81 1.77 1.79 247 2 16.0 20.0 15:30 648.45 1.50 185 86 81 1.71 1.74 243 2 20.0 24.0 15:34 651.48 1.50 186 87 81 1.71 1.74 244 3 24.0 28.0 15:38 654.42 1.50 184 87 82 1.71 1.74 248 3 28.0 32.0 15:42 657.39 1.50 188 88 82 1.71 1.74 246 3 32.0 36.0 15:46 660.39 1.50 188 88 82 1.71 1.74 247 4 36.0 40.0 15:50 663.39 1.55 189 88 82 1.77 1.8 250 4 40.0 44.0 15:54 666.45 1.55 191 88 82 1.77 1.8 249 4 44.0 48.0 15:58 669.54 1.50 187 88 82 1.71 1.74 249 5 48.0 52.0 16:02 672.45 1.50 186 88 82 1.71 1.74 247 5 52.0 56.0 16:06 675.43 1.60 187 89 83 1.82 1.86 246 5 56.0 60.0 16:10 678.55 1.60 185 89 83 1.82 1.86 250 6 60.0 64.0 16:14 681.62 1.80 184 89 83 2.05 2.09 248 6 64.0 68.0 16:18 684.79 1.60 181 89 83 1.82 1.86 247 6 68.0 72.0 16:22 687.82 1.80 183 89 83 2.05 2.1 250 7 72.0 76.0 16:26 691.05 1.70 185 89 83 1.94 1.98 249 7 76.0 80.0 16:30 694.2 1.65 191 89 83 1.88 1.92 249 7 80.0 84.0 16:34 697.39 1.70 197 89 83 1.94 1.98 250 8 84.0 88.0 16:38 700.57 1.60 196 89 83 1.82 1.86 250 8 88.0 92.0 16:42 703.65 1.60 201 89 83 1.82 1.86 250 8 92.0 96.0 16:46 706.66 1.60 204 89 83 1.83 1.86 250 1 96.0 100.0 16:57 709.69 1.50 202 84 83 1.71 1.74 252 1 100.0 104.0 17:01 712.62 1.50 224 86 83 1.71 1.74 242 1 104.0 108.0 17:05 715.56 1.50 231 88 83 1.71 1.73 237 2 108.0 112.0 17:09 718.47 1.50 234 88 83 1.71 1.73 238 2 112.0 116.0 17:13 721.37 1.55 233 88 83 1.77 1.78 239 2 116.0 120.0 17:17 724.26 1.55 229 89 83 1.77 1.78 239 3 120.0 124.0 17:21 727.15 1.60 229 89 83 1.82 1.84 238 3 124.0 128.0 17:25 730.18 1.60 224 89 83 1.82 1.83 229 3 128.0 132.0 17:29 733.19 1.60 221 89 83 1.82 1.83 239 4 132.0 136.0 17:33 736.24 1.50 215 89 83 1.71 1.72 249 4 136.0 140.0 17:37 739.2 1.70 212 89 83 1.94 1.94 248 4 140.0 144.0 17:41 742.28 1.60 210 89 83 1.82 1.83 247 5 144.0 148.0 17:45 745.25 1.60 208 89 83 1.82 1.83 252 5 148.0 152.0 17:49 748.2 1.65 204 89 83 1.88 1.89 251 5 152.0 156.0 17:53 751.19 1.70 203 89 83 1.94 1.94 248 6 156.0 160.0 17:57 754.24 1.65 198 89 83 1.88 1.89 249 6 160.0 164.0 18:01 757.33 1.70 197 89 83 1.94 1.94 249 6 164.0 168.0 18:05 760.45 1.75 196 89 83 1.99 2 247 7 168.0 172.0 18:09 763.66 1.70 191 89 83 1.94 1.94 250 7 172.0 176.0 18:13 766.82 1.70 192 89 83 1.94 1.94 250 7 176.0 180.0 18:17 769.93 1.75 190 89 83 1.99 2 250 8 180.0 184.0 18:21 773.20 1.70 191 89 83 1.94 1.95 249 8 184.0 188.0 18:25 776.25 1.80 190 89 83 2.05 2.06 249 8 188.0 192.0 18:29 779.4 1.60 190 89 83 1.82 1.83 249 

192.0 18:33 782.48

Average: 146.13 1.61 199.0 88.1 82.6 1.83 1.85 247 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 4ft - A Pollutant Metals Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Isolatek DGM # 3 Method 29 Total Points 16 0.008 @15" 0.005 @6"

Location Huntington Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 12.0

Source Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 10/28/2010 Time/reading 4.0Operator TS Bws (%) 1.4 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 17 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.93Barometric 30.02 Silica Gel Weight Gain 26 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 30.02 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.19 O2 (%) 18 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00020 CO2 (%) 2.4 Md 29.10 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.95 Act. Flow (cfm) 41,496 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 145.30 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 34,217

Moisture % 1.37 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 33,751

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 8:11 782.88 1.70 184 55 55 1.91 1.88 248 

1 4.0 8.0 8:15 785.82 1.70 173 56 55 1.91 1.9 252 1 8.0 12.0 8:19 788.83 1.80 171 57 56 2.03 2.02 250 2 12.0 16.0 8:23 791.84 1.70 168 59 56 1.91 1.92 250 2 16.0 20.0 8:27 794.75 1.80 167 61 56 2.03 2.03 251 2 20.0 24.0 8:31 797.83 1.70 168 62 57 1.91 1.92 250 3 24.0 28.0 8:35 800.88 1.70 166 63 57 1.91 1.93 250 3 28.0 32.0 8:39 803.93 1.75 166 64 58 1.97 1.99 247 3 32.0 36.0 8:43 807 1.70 166 65 58 1.91 1.94 243 4 36.0 40.0 8:47 810.02 1.75 169 65 58 1.97 1.99 243 4 40.0 44.0 8:51 813.05 1.60 167 66 59 1.80 1.83 243 4 44.0 48.0 8:55 816.08 1.65 170 67 59 1.86 1.88 245 5 48.0 52.0 8:59 819.04 1.70 173 67 60 1.91 1.94 246 5 52.0 56.0 9:03 822.14 1.70 175 67 60 1.91 1.94 245 5 56.0 60.0 9:07 825.2 1.75 172 68 60 1.97 2 247 6 60.0 64.0 9:11 828.30 1.60 169 68 61 1.80 1.83 244 6 64.0 68.0 9:15 831.42 1.75 175 68 61 1.97 2 240 6 68.0 72.0 9:19 834.55 1.65 171 69 61 1.86 1.89 240 7 72.0 76.0 9:23 837.7 1.70 171 69 61 1.91 1.94 238 7 76.0 80.0 9:27 840.82 1.60 170 69 62 1.80 1.83 242 7 80.0 84.0 9:31 843.76 1.70 170 69 62 1.91 1.95 239 8 84.0 88.0 9:35 846.81 1.75 168 69 62 1.97 2 244 8 88.0 92.0 9:39 849.96 1.65 168 69 62 1.86 1.89 242 8 92.0 96.0 9:43 852.96 1.70 172 69 62 1.92 1.95 245 1 96.0 100.0 9:54 856.00 1.80 173 62 62 2.03 2.06 250 1 100.0 104.0 9:59 859.18 1.70 181 66 62 1.91 1.95 246 1 104.0 108.0 10:04 862.25 1.85 180 68 62 2.08 2.12 248 2 108.0 112.0 10:09 865.28 1.70 190 69 62 1.91 1.94 250 2 112.0 116.0 10:14 868.33 1.65 193 69 62 1.86 1.89 249 2 116.0 120.0 10:19 871.31 1.80 188 69 62 2.03 2.06 253 3 120.0 124.0 10:24 874.44 1.70 184 70 62 1.91 1.94 248 3 124.0 128.0 10:29 877.46 1.65 189 70 62 1.86 1.88 251 3 128.0 132.0 10:34 880.56 1.60 199 70 63 1.80 1.82 249 4 132.0 136.0 10:39 883.50 1.60 210 70 63 1.80 1.82 252 4 136.0 140.0 10:44 886.4 1.60 211 71 63 1.80 1.82 248 4 140.0 144.0 10:49 889.53 1.60 206 71 63 1.80 1.82 248 5 144.0 148.0 10:54 892.46 1.50 207 71 63 1.69 1.7 250 5 148.0 152.0 10:59 895.22 1.40 204 69 63 1.58 1.59 249 5 152.0 156.0 11:04 898.02 1.50 202 69 63 1.69 1.7 250 6 156.0 160.0 11:09 900.86 1.50 201 69 63 1.69 1.7 248 6 160.0 164.0 11:14 903.53 1.50 198 69 63 1.69 1.7 251 6 164.0 168.0 11:19 906.52 1.55 191 70 63 1.74 1.75 251 7 168.0 172.0 11:24 909.40 1.55 187 70 63 1.74 1.75 251 7 172.0 176.0 11:29 912.22 1.55 182 69 63 1.74 1.75 249 7 176.0 180.0 11:34 915.06 1.50 176 70 63 1.69 1.7 250 8 180.0 184.0 11:39 917.96 1.60 180 70 63 1.80 1.81 250 8 184.0 188.0 11:44 920.91 1.50 172 70 63 1.69 1.7 249 8 188.0 192.0 11:49 923.75 1.50 174 70 63 1.69 1.7 249 

192.0 11:30 926.59

Average: 143.71 1.65 180.6 67.1 60.9 1.86 1.88 247 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 4ft - A Pollutant Metals Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Isolatek DGM # 3 Method 29 Total Points 16 0.00 @15" 0.00 @6"

Location Huntington Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 12.0

Source Cupola Exhaust Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 10-28-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator TS Bws (%) 1.5 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 24 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.93Barometric 30.02 Silica Gel Weight Gain 25 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 30.02 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.19 O2 (%) 19 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00020 CO2 (%) 1.6 Md 29.02 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.85 Act. Flow (cfm) 42,199 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 149.40 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 35,199

Moisture % 1.52 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 34,668

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 11:54 926.81 1.60 145 61 61 1.82 1.91 250 

1 4.0 8.0 11:59 929.83 1.65 144 62 61 1.88 1.97 248 1 8.0 12.0 12:04 932.93 1.70 143 63 61 1.93 2.03 244 2 12.0 16.0 12:09 936.06 1.65 139 65 61 1.88 1.98 250 2 16.0 20.0 12:14 939.11 1.70 136 66 61 1.93 2.04 250 2 20.0 24.0 12:19 942.19 1.70 135 67 61 1.93 2.05 252 3 24.0 28.0 12:24 945.35 1.70 133 68 61 1.93 2.05 249 3 28.0 32.0 12:29 948.51 1.75 131 68 62 1.99 2.12 250 3 32.0 36.0 12:34 951.67 1.70 129 69 62 1.93 2.06 251 4 36.0 40.0 12:39 954.87 1.70 128 69 62 1.93 2.07 250 4 40.0 44.0 12:44 957.92 1.70 127 69 62 1.93 2.07 249 4 44.0 48.0 13:59 961.01 1.70 127 69 62 1.93 2.07 246 5 48.0 52.0 14:03 964.16 1.80 148 59 58 2.05 2.19 249 5 52.0 56.0 14:07 967.36 1.70 156 61 58 1.93 2.06 248 5 56.0 60.0 14:11 970.58 1.65 166 63 59 1.88 1.99 250 6 60.0 64.0 14:15 973.60 1.80 175 64 59 2.05 2.17 251 6 64.0 68.0 14:19 976.79 1.80 174 65 59 2.05 2.16 249 6 68.0 72.0 14:23 979.98 1.85 176 67 60 2.11 2.21 249 7 72.0 76.0 14:27 983.2 1.85 175 68 60 2.11 2.21 250 7 76.0 80.0 14:31 986.45 1.90 172 68 61 2.16 2.26 251 7 80.0 84.0 14:35 989.7 1.90 177 69 61 2.16 2.26 250 8 84.0 88.0 14:39 992.96 1.90 178 69 62 2.16 2.25 250 8 88.0 92.0 14:43 996.19 1.80 177 70 62 2.05 2.13 250 8 92.0 96.0 14:47 999.41 1.80 183 70 62 2.05 2.13 251 1 96.0 100.0 14:56 1002.45 1.80 192 64 63 2.05 2.12 244 1 100.0 104.0 15:00 1005.32 1.75 191 68 63 1.99 2.06 250 1 104.0 108.0 15:04 1008.39 1.75 188 70 63 1.99 2.05 251 2 108.0 112.0 15:08 1011.55 1.80 187 70 63 2.05 2.11 250 2 112.0 116.0 15:12 1014.68 1.60 189 70 63 1.82 1.87 250 2 116.0 120.0 15:16 1017.67 1.70 198 71 64 1.93 1.99 251 3 120.0 124.0 15:20 1020.69 1.70 199 71 64 1.93 1.98 249 3 124.0 128.0 15:24 1023.76 1.60 201 71 64 1.82 1.86 248 3 128.0 132.0 15:28 1026.73 1.55 215 71 64 1.76 1.8 251 4 132.0 136.0 15:32 1029.65 1.60 222 71 64 1.82 1.85 251 4 136.0 140.0 15:36 1032.59 1.55 219 71 64 1.76 1.79 250 4 140.0 144.0 15:40 1035.43 1.60 220 71 64 1.82 1.85 250 5 144.0 148.0 15:44 1038.33 1.60 216 71 64 1.82 1.84 249 5 148.0 152.0 15:48 1041.25 1.70 207 71 64 1.93 1.95 250 5 152.0 156.0 15:52 1044.28 1.80 196 71 64 2.05 2.07 250 6 156.0 160.0 15:56 1047.31 1.80 199 71 64 2.05 2.07 250 6 160.0 164.0 16:00 1050.39 1.80 184 71 64 2.05 2.07 250 6 164.0 168.0 16:04 1053.48 1.80 180 71 64 2.05 2.07 248 7 168.0 172.0 16:08 1056.58 1.60 179 71 64 1.82 1.84 251 7 172.0 176.0 16:12 1059.55 1.70 175 71 64 1.93 1.95 250 7 176.0 180.0 16:16 1062.62 1.70 175 71 64 1.93 1.95 248 8 180.0 184.0 16:20 1065.72 1.70 176 71 65 1.93 1.95 247 8 184.0 188.0 16:24 1068.8 1.75 169 71 64 1.99 2.01 248 8 188.0 192.0 16:28 1071.96 1.60 165 71 65 1.82 1.84 250 

192.0 16:32 1074.95

Average: 148.14 1.72 173.3 68.3 62.3 1.96 2.03 249.4 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Isolatek DGM # 205316A Method 30B Total Points 2Location Hungton IN Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator TS Bws (%) 1 # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.32

Barometric 29.41 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 0.9916 Pm (in Hg) #VALUE! Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 16 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 8.72665 CO2 (%) 3.0 Md 29.12 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

40 Est.DH(in H2O) NA Ms 29.01 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

8:30 0.0 268 243 255 1.2 1.2 7 5 0.00 0 73 75 8:35 5.0 217 250 250 1.2 1.2 7 5 6.172 6.189 76 77

9:35* 10.0 207 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 5 12.481 12.323 77 77

*process delay 15.0 212 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 18.936 18.852 78 78

20.0 208 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 25.372 25.671 79 8025.0 212 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 31.675 31.841 80 8030.0 215 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 37.926 38.021 81 8135.0 214 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 44.007 44.102 81 8240.0 217 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 50.349 50.276 81 8245.0 218 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 56.427 56.271 83 8350.0 213 249 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 62.482 62.127 83 8355.0 217 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 68.723 68.682 84 8460.0 218 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 74.580 74.310 84 8465.0 213 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 81.052 81.103 84 8470.0 207 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 86.799 87.281 83 8475.0 210 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 93.121 93.582 83 8380.0 215 250 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 99.549 100.056 83 8385.0 216 250 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 106.242 106.412 83 8390.0 205 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 112.851 112.776 81 8395.0 217 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 119.323 118.911 80 83

100.0 219 251 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 125.631 125.221 80 81105.0 219 248 252 1.2 1.2 8 6 131.824 131.268 81 81110.0 214 245 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 137.816 137.282 81 81115.0 214 248 251 1.2 1.2 8 6 144.127 143.648 81 81

11:41 120.0 - - - - - - - 150.125 149.914 - - 

Average 120.0 216.0 249.3 250.1 80.83333333 81.375

Volume 150.125 149.914 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

L

Pre Test Post Test Pre T

0.000 @ 15" 0.001 @ 7" 0.001 

Trap/ Probe Temp 
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Isolatek DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 2Location Hungton IN Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator TS Bws (%) # of Ports 2 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.32

Barometric 29.41 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 0.9916 Pm (in Hg) 29.41 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 18 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 8.72665 CO2 (%) 2.9 Md 29.18 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 29.18 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

11:53 0.0 216 248 250 1.2 1.2 7 6 0.00 0 80 81 

5.0 209 253 246 1.2 1.2 8 6 6.43 6.318 80 80

10.0 208 249 253 1.2 1.2 8 6 13.27 12.812 80 8015.0 208 252 228 1.2 1.2 8 6 19.48 18.81 80 8020.0 204 248 251 1.2 1.2 8 6 25.10 24.907 81 8125.0 205 250 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 31.13 31.203 81 8130.0 204 251 247 1.2 1.2 8 6 37.36 37.282 81 8135.0 206 250 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 43.38 43.561 81 8140.0 204 250 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 49.86 50.009 81 8145.0 209 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 56.63 56.719 81 8150.0 211 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 63.42 63.619 81 8155.0 208 248 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 70.28 69.902 81 8160.0 209 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 76.92 76.584 81 8165.0 217 250 251 1.2 1.2 8 6 83.50 83.192 81 8170.0 215 248 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 88.51 88.241 81 8175.0 212 249 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 94.22 94.181 81 8180.0 212 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 101.52 100.723 81 8185.0 211 251 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 107.34 107.122 81 8190.0 210 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 114.65 113.721 81 8195.0 202 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 119.28 118.322 81 81

100.0 199 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 125.72 125.645 81 81105.0 205 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 131.57 131.582 81 81110.0 209 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 137.15 137.622 81 81115.0 212 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 142.51 143.613 81 81120.0 149.124 149.586 

Average 120.0 208.5 249.9 248.6 80.83333333 80.88

Volume 149.124 149.586 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Trap/ Probe Temp

0.005 @ 1

Pre Tes

o.008 @ 15"

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Isolatek DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 0Location Huntington In Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 26-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator TS Bws (%) 1 # of Ports Total Run 120.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.32

Barometric 29.41 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.41 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 18 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 8.72665 CO2 (%) 2.9 Md 29.18 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 29.07 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

14:35 0.0 213 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 0.00 0 77 77 

5.0 216 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 5.825 5.789 79 76

10.0 225 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 12.765 12.481 77 7615.0 223 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 18.935 18.625 77 7720.0 223 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 25.253 24.621 77 7825.0 220 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 31.464 30.592 78 7830.0 222 249 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 37.914 37.623 79 7935.0 223 251 249 1.2 1.2 8 6 44.287 43.931 80 8040.0 225 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 50.391 50.352 81 8045.0 230 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 56.937 56.941 81 8150.0 234 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 63.167 63.211 81 8155.0 240 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 69.452 69.743 81 8160.0 240 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 75.234 76.081 82 8265.0 238 250 248 1.2 1.2 8 6 82.034 82.312 82 82

15:45 port 70.0 241 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 87.669 87.954 82 82

15:50 restart 75.0 236 250 251 1.2 1.2 8 6 93.698 94.261 82 82

80.0 238 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 99.759 100.462 82 8285.0 234 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 106.003 106.781 82 8290.0 233 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 112.318 113.018 83 8395.0 244 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 118.622 119.413 83 83

100.0 239 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 124.962 125.543 83 83105.0 244 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 131.462 131.781 84 84110.0 252 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 137.678 137.821 84 84115.0 247 250 250 1.2 1.2 8 6 144.220 144.121 84 84

16:40 120.0 150.531 150.192 

Average 120.0 232.5 250.0 249.9 80.875 80.71

Volume 150.531 150.192 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

0.002 @ 15" 0.008 @ 7" 0.004 @ 1

Trap/ Probe Temp 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 5FT E Pollutant Hex ChromePoints/Port 8 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Isolatek DGM # MB4 Method 61 Total Points 16 0.01 @@ 15" 0.001 @8"

Location Huntington, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 12.0

Source Cupola Exhaust Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 10/27/2010 Time/reading 4.0Operator MY Bws (%) 1.87 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 17 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.65Barometric 29.74 Silica Gel Weight Gain 32 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 29.74 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.175 O2 (%) 17 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00017 CO2 (%) 3.3 Md 29.21 Stack Area (sf) 8.71

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 29.00 Act. Flow (cfm) 41,655 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 120.62 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 33,267

Moisture % 1.88 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 32,646

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 15:14 395.73 1.70 185 76 76 1.29 1.32 

1 4.0 8.0 15:18 398.49 1.70 185 76 75 1.29 1.32 1 8.0 12.0 15:22 401.24 1.60 184 78 75 1.21 1.25 2 12.0 16.0 15:26 403.87 1.70 181 79 75 1.29 1.33 2 16.0 20.0 15:30 406.49 1.70 184 80 75 1.29 1.33 2 20.0 24.0 15:34 409.15 1.70 183 80 75 1.29 1.33 3 24.0 28.0 15:38 411.84 1.70 183 81 75 1.29 1.33 3 28.0 32.0 15:42 414.55 1.70 184 81 75 1.29 1.33 3 32.0 36.0 15:46 417.23 1.60 184 81 75 1.21 1.25 4 36.0 40.0 15:50 419.83 1.50 186 81 76 1.14 1.17 4 40.0 44.0 15:54 422.35 1.60 187 81 75 1.21 1.25 4 44.0 48.0 15:58 424.97 1.50 184 80 76 1.14 1.17 5 48.0 52.0 16:02 427.5 1.80 183 80 75 1.36 1.41 5 52.0 56.0 16:06 430.24 1.80 181 81 76 1.36 1.41 5 56.0 60.0 16:10 433 1.80 182 81 76 1.36 1.41 6 60.0 64.0 16:14 435.76 1.80 181 81 76 1.36 1.41 6 64.0 68.0 16:18 438.51 1.50 177 80 76 1.14 1.17 6 68.0 72.0 16:22 441.07 1.70 180 80 76 1.29 1.33 7 72.0 76.0 16:26 443.72 1.60 181 81 76 1.21 1.25 7 76.0 80.0 16:30 446.34 1.60 185 80 76 1.21 1.25 7 80.0 84.0 16:34 448.96 1.60 191 80 76 1.21 1.25 8 84.0 88.0 16:38 451.57 1.50 191 80 76 1.14 1.17 8 88.0 92.0 16:42 454.08 1.60 197 80 76 1.21 1.25 8 92.0 96.0 16:46 456.65 1.50 198 81 76 1.14 1.17 1 96.0 100.0 16:57 459.16 1.60 210 76 75 1.21 1.25 1 100.0 104.0 17:01 461.72 1.70 219 79 76 1.29 1.32 1 104.0 108.0 17:05 464.36 1.70 222 80 76 1.29 1.32 2 108.0 112.0 17:09 466.99 1.60 230 80 76 1.21 1.24 2 112.0 116.0 17:13 469.59 1.60 232 80 76 1.21 1.24 2 116.0 120.0 17:17 472.14 1.60 227 81 76 1.21 1.23 3 120.0 124.0 17:21 474.66 1.70 226 80 76 1.29 1.31 3 124.0 128.0 17:25 477.28 1.70 221 80 76 1.29 1.31 3 128.0 132.0 17:29 479.91 1.80 218 81 76 1.36 1.38 4 132.0 136.0 17:33 482.54 1.50 211 80 76 1.14 1.15 4 136.0 140.0 17:37 485.04 1.70 210 80 76 1.29 1.3 4 140.0 144.0 17:41 487.66 1.70 207 81 76 1.29 1.3 5 144.0 148.0 17:45 490.28 1.50 202 81 75 1.14 1.15 5 148.0 152.0 17:49 492.74 1.60 202 80 76 1.21 1.23 5 152.0 156.0 17:53 495.3 1.60 199 80 76 1.21 1.23 6 156.0 160.0 17:57 497.86 1.50 195 80 75 1.14 1.15 6 160.0 164.0 18:01 500.35 1.50 193 80 75 1.14 1.15 6 164.0 168.0 18:05 502.85 1.60 191 80 75 1.21 1.23 7 168.0 172.0 18:09 505.41 1.50 189 80 75 1.14 1.15 7 172.0 176.0 18:13 507.92 1.50 187 80 75 1.14 1.15 7 176.0 180.0 18:17 510.42 1.50 186 80 75 1.14 1.15 8 180.0 184.0 18:21 512.92 1.50 186 79 75 1.14 1.15 8 184.0 188.0 18:25 515.43 1.50 185 79 75 1.14 1.15 8 188.0 192.0 18:29 517.93 1.50 185 79 75 1.14 1.15 

192.0 18:33 520.43

Average: 124.70 1.62 195.2 79.9 75.6 1.23 1.26 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 5FT E Pollutant Hex ChromePoints/Port 8 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Isolatek DGM # MB 4 Method 61 Total Points 16 0.01 @ 15" 0.01 @ 6"

Location Huntington, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 12.0

Source Cupola Exhaust Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 10/28/2010 Time/reading 4.0Operator MY Bws (%) 2.7 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 54 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.93Barometric 30.02 Silica Gel Weight Gain 21 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 30.02 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.175 O2 (%) 18 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00017 CO2 (%) 2.4 Md 29.10 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.80 Act. Flow (cfm) 41,951 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 125.64 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 34,833

Moisture % 2.73 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 33,887

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 8:11 522.20 1.40 168 52 51 1.04 1.07 

1 4.0 8.0 8:15 524.62 1.40 163 53 51 1.04 1.07 1 8.0 12.0 8:19 526.96 1.40 160 55 52 1.04 1.08 2 12.0 16.0 8:23 529.3 1.50 159 56 52 1.11 1.16 2 16.0 20.0 8:27 531.72 1.50 157 57 52 1.11 1.16 2 20.0 24.0 8:31 534.17 1.50 154 58 53 1.11 1.16 3 24.0 28.0 8:35 536.59 1.80 154 58 53 1.33 1.4 3 28.0 32.0 8:39 539.29 1.70 162 59 53 1.26 1.32 3 32.0 36.0 8:43 541.95 1.70 164 59 53 1.26 1.32 4 36.0 40.0 8:47 544.58 1.80 164 59 53 1.33 1.4 4 40.0 44.0 8:51 547.22 1.70 166 60 53 1.26 1.32 4 44.0 48.0 8:55 549.83 1.70 167 60 54 1.26 1.32 5 48.0 52.0 8:59 552.42 1.70 170 60 54 1.26 1.32 5 52.0 56.0 9:03 555.03 1.70 173 60 54 1.26 1.32 5 56.0 60.0 9:07 557.64 1.80 170 60 54 1.33 1.39 6 60.0 64.0 9:11 560.30 1.80 167 60 54 1.33 1.39 6 64.0 68.0 9:15 562.95 1.90 171 60 55 1.41 1.47 6 68.0 72.0 9:19 565.71 1.90 171 61 55 1.41 1.47 7 72.0 76.0 9:23 568.47 1.80 169 61 55 1.33 1.39 7 76.0 80.0 9:27 571.16 1.80 167 61 55 1.33 1.39 7 80.0 84.0 9:31 573.84 1.80 169 61 55 1.33 1.39 8 84.0 88.0 9:35 576.51 1.80 166 61 55 1.33 1.39 8 88.0 92.0 9:39 579.2 1.80 165 60 55 1.33 1.39 8 92.0 96.0 9:43 581.88 1.80 170 60 55 1.33 1.39 1 96.0 100.0 9:54 584.57 1.70 170 56 55 1.26 1.31 1 100.0 104.0 9:58 587.17 1.60 177 58 55 1.18 1.24 1 104.0 108.0 10:02 589.7 1.70 177 59 55 1.26 1.31 2 108.0 112.0 10:06 592.25 1.70 182 59 55 1.26 1.31 2 112.0 116.0 10:10 594.83 1.60 190 60 55 1.18 1.23 2 116.0 120.0 10:14 597.35 1.70 186 60 55 1.26 1.31 3 120.0 124.0 10:18 599.94 1.60 182 61 55 1.18 1.23 3 124.0 128.0 10:22 602.44 1.70 184 61 55 1.26 1.31 3 128.0 132.0 10:26 604.96 1.70 195 60 55 1.26 1.31 4 132.0 136.0 10:30 607.51 1.60 201 61 55 1.18 1.23 4 136.0 140.0 10:34 610.01 1.70 206 61 55 1.26 1.3 4 140.0 144.0 10:38 612.55 1.70 202 61 56 1.26 1.3 5 144.0 148.0 10:42 615.09 1.60 204 61 56 1.18 1.22 5 148.0 152.0 10:46 617.58 1.50 203 61 56 1.11 1.14 5 152.0 156.0 10:50 620.05 1.60 198 61 56 1.18 1.22 6 156.0 160.0 10:54 622.5 1.60 198 62 56 1.18 1.22 6 160.0 164.0 10:58 625.05 1.70 197 61 56 1.26 1.29 6 164.0 168.0 11:02 627.58 1.70 189 61 56 1.26 1.29 7 168.0 172.0 11:06 630.12 1.70 187 61 56 1.26 1.29 7 172.0 176.0 11:10 632.67 1.80 182 62 56 1.33 1.37 7 176.0 180.0 11:14 635.31 1.80 176 61 56 1.33 1.37 8 180.0 184.0 11:18 637.95 1.80 167 62 56 1.33 1.37 8 184.0 188.0 11:22 640.59 1.80 166 62 56 1.33 1.37 8 188.0 192.0 11:26 643.25 1.80 170 62 56 1.33 1.37 

192.0 11:30 645.95

Average: 123.75 1.69 176.1 59.7 54.6 1.25 1.30 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 5 FT E Pollutant Hex Chrome Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Isolatek DGM # MB 4 Method 61 Total Points 16 0.00@ 15" 0.00 @6"

Location Huntington Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 12.0

Source Cupola Exhaust Delta ∆H@ 1.71 Date 28-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator MY Bws (%) 2.7 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 56 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.93Barometric 30.02 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18 DGM Y 0.994 Pm (in Hg) 30.02 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.175 O2 (%) 19 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00017 CO2 (%) 1.6 Md 29.02 Stack Area (sf) 8.71

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.72 Act. Flow (cfm) 41,725 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 126.59 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 34,966

Moisture % 2.68 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 34,035

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not 

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Tem

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 11:54 646.17 1.80 141 55 55 1.35 1.44 

1 4.0 8.0 11:59 648.87 1.90 142 55 55 1.42 1.52 1 8.0 12.0 12:04 651.66 1.90 141 56 55 1.42 1.52 2 12.0 16.0 12:09 654.45 1.90 138 57 55 1.42 1.53 2 16.0 20.0 12:14 657.23 1.80 135 59 55 1.35 1.45 2 20.0 24.0 12:19 659.95 1.90 133 60 55 1.42 1.53 3 24.0 28.0 12:24 662.78 1.80 131 60 55 1.35 1.46 3 28.0 32.0 12:29 665.57 1.90 131 61 55 1.42 1.54 3 32.0 36.0 12:34 668.41 1.90 127 61 55 1.42 1.54 4 36.0 40.0 13:55 671.19 1.80 126 60 55 1.35 1.46 4 40.0 44.0 13:59 673.94 1.80 125 61 56 1.35 1.47 4 44.0 48.0 14:03 676.79 1.70 140 54 54 1.27 1.38 5 48.0 52.0 14:07 679.35 1.70 148 54 54 1.27 1.38 5 52.0 56.0 14:11 682.04 1.80 153 55 54 1.35 1.46 5 56.0 60.0 14:15 684.73 1.70 163 56 54 1.27 1.37 6 60.0 64.0 14:19 687.34 1.70 172 57 54 1.27 1.37 6 64.0 68.0 14:23 689.96 1.60 171 58 54 1.20 1.28 6 68.0 72.0 14:27 692.51 1.70 172 59 54 1.27 1.36 7 72.0 76.0 14:31 695.11 1.60 173 60 55 1.20 1.28 7 76.0 80.0 14:35 697.67 1.70 170 60 55 1.27 1.35 7 80.0 84.0 14:39 700.24 1.60 174 61 55 1.20 1.27 8 84.0 88.0 14:43 702.77 1.70 175 61 56 1.27 1.35 8 88.0 92.0 14:47 705.34 1.70 175 62 56 1.27 1.35 8 92.0 96.0 14:51 707.93 1.70 178 62 56 1.28 1.35 1 96.0 100.0 14:56 710.49 1.50 177 58 57 1.12 1.18 1 100.0 104.0 15:00 712.98 1.50 186 60 56 1.12 1.18 1 104.0 108.0 15:04 715.45 1.40 187 62 57 1.05 1.1 2 108.0 112.0 15:08 717.84 1.50 183 62 57 1.12 1.18 2 112.0 116.0 15:12 720.29 1.50 184 62 57 1.12 1.18 2 116.0 120.0 15:16 722.71 1.50 192 62 57 1.12 1.17 3 120.0 124.0 15:20 725.16 1.50 195 62 57 1.12 1.17 3 124.0 128.0 15:24 727.58 1.40 197 62 57 1.05 1.09 3 128.0 132.0 15:28 729.98 1.40 209 62 57 1.05 1.09 4 132.0 136.0 15:32 732.39 1.30 217 63 58 0.97 1.01 4 136.0 140.0 15:36 734.71 1.50 215 62 57 1.12 1.16 4 140.0 144.0 15:40 737.13 1.40 216 63 57 1.05 1.08 5 144.0 148.0 15:44 739.46 1.60 213 62 58 1.20 1.24 5 148.0 152.0 15:48 741.93 1.70 205 63 58 1.27 1.31 5 152.0 156.0 15:52 744.42 1.80 196 63 58 1.35 1.39 6 156.0 160.0 15:56 747.05 1.80 188 63 58 1.35 1.39 6 160.0 164.0 16:00 749.7 1.80 181 63 58 1.35 1.39 6 164.0 168.0 16:04 752.33 1.80 179 63 58 1.35 1.38 7 168.0 172.0 16:08 754.97 1.80 176 63 58 1.35 1.39 7 172.0 176.0 16:12 757.61 1.80 173 63 58 1.35 1.39 7 176.0 180.0 16:16 760.26 1.90 173 63 58 1.42 1.46 8 180.0 184.0 16:20 762.96 1.90 168 63 58 1.42 1.46 8 184.0 188.0 16:24 765.7 1.90 167 63 58 1.42 1.46 8 188.0 192.0 16:28 768.45 1.80 164 63 58 1.35 1.39 

192.0 16:32 771.13

Average: 124.96 1.69 170.3 60.4 56.2 1.27 1.34 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 4ft-A Pollutant HCL Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company Isolatek DGM # 3 Method 26A Total Points 16 0.001 @ 15"

Location Huntington, IN Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 4.0

Source Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 10/27/2010 Time/reading 4.0 0.000 @ 6"

Operator TS Bws (%) 1.69 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 7 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.65Barometric 29.74 Silica Gel Weight Gain 12 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.74 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.196 O2 (%) 18.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00021 CO2 (%) 2.2 Md 29.09 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.90 Act. Flow (cfm) 43,969 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 51.59 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 48.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 35,193

Moisture % 1.70 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 34,598

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 4.0 10:01 476.82 1.90 207 63 63 2.39 2.39 2

2 4.0 8.0 10:05 480.15 1.90 182 67 67 2.39 2.39 23 8.0 12.0 10:09 483.52 1.85 178 68 67 2.33 2.35 24 12.0 16.0 10:13 486.80 1.60 177 70 67 2.01 2.04 25 16.0 20.0 10:17 489.96 1.70 176 72 68 2.14 2.18 26 20.0 24.0 10:21 493.18 1.90 184 74 68 2.39 2.44 27 24.0 28.0 10:25 496.45 1.80 194 75 69 2.27 2.31 28 28.0 32.0 10:29 499.67 1.70 196 77 69 2.14 2.18 2

1 32.0 36.0 10:38 502.91 1.80 202 72 70 2.27 2.3 22 36.0 40.0 10:42 506.22 1.85 204 77 71 2.33 2.36 23 40.0 44.0 10:46 509.46 1.90 204 78 71 2.39 2.42 24 44.0 48.0 10:50 512.80 1.80 202 78 71 2.27 2.3 25 48.0 52.0 10:54 516.15 1.85 200 78 72 2.33 2.36 26 52.0 56.0 10:58 519.42 1.70 201 80 72 2.14 2.17 27 56.0 60.0 11:02 522.63 1.75 196 80 72 2.20 2.23 28 60.0 64.0 11:06 525.88 1.70 197 80 73 2.14 2.17 2

64.0 11:10 529.10

Average: 52.28 1.79 193.8 74.3 69.4 2.26 2.29 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 4ft - A Pollutant HCL Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company Isolatek DGM # 3 Method 26A Total Points 16

Location Huntington Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 4.0 0.00 @ 15" 0.00 @ 7"

Source Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 10/27/2010 Time/reading 4.0

Operator TS Bws (%) 1.6 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 7 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.65Barometric 29.74 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.74 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.196 O2 (%) 18.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00021 CO2 (%) 2.2 Md 29.09 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.91 Act. Flow (cfm) 44,530 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 51.16 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 48.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 34,868

Moisture % 1.63 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 34,305

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 4.0 11:19 529.32 1.80 202 74 73 2.25 2.27 2

2 4.0 8.0 11:23 532.55 1.75 202 78 74 2.19 2.22 23 8.0 12.0 11:27 535.78 1.85 202 80 74 2.31 2.35 24 12.0 16.0 11:31 539.18 1.90 197 82 74 2.37 2.42 25 16.0 20.0 11:35 542.58 1.85 197 83 75 2.31 2.36 26 20.0 24.0 11:39 545.81 1.80 201 83 75 2.25 2.30 27 24.0 28.0 11:43 549.12 1.75 199 84 76 2.19 2.23 28 28.0 32.0 11:47 552.31 1.70 201 84 76 2.12 2.17 2

1 32.0 36.0 12:32 555.54 1.80 227 77 77 2.25 2.29 22 36.0 40.0 12:36 558.78 1.85 225 78 77 2.31 2.34 23 40.0 44.0 12:40 562.06 1.75 219 81 77 2.19 2.21 24 44.0 48.0 12:44 565.27 1.70 216 83 78 2.12 2.15 25 48.0 52.0 12:48 568.47 1.75 217 84 78 2.19 2.21 26 52.0 56.0 12:52 571.68 1.90 212 85 78 2.37 2.40 27 56.0 60.0 12:56 575.09 1.85 207 87 79 2.31 2.34 28 60.0 64.0 13:00 578.45 1.80 208 87 79 2.25 2.28 2

64.0 13:04 581.86

Average: 52.55 1.80 208.3 81.9 76.3 2.25 2.28 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.16 Probe # 4ft - A Pollutant HCL Points/Port 8 Start Finish Pre P

Company Isolatek DGM # 3 Method 26A Total Points 16

Location Huntington Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 4.0 0.00 @ 15"

Source Cupola Ex Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 10-27-10 Time/reading 4.0 0.00 @ 7"

Operator TS Bws (%) 1.5 # of Ports 2 Total Run 64.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 2 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.65Barometric 29.74 Silica Gel Weight Gain 15 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.74 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -1.2 Actual Dn (in) 0.196 O2 (%) 17.7 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.33 An (ft^2) 0.00021 CO2 (%) 2.7 Md 29.14 Stack Area (sf) 8.73

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.97 Act. Flow (cfm) 44,218 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 52.10 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 48.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 34,984

Moisture % 1.51 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 34,459

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 4.0 13:13 582.10 1.80 203 81 80 2.30 2.3 2

2 4.0 8.0 13:17 585.38 1.75 204 85 80 2.23 2.24 2

3 8.0 12.0 13:21 588.63 1.90 204 87 81 2.43 2.43 24 12.0 16.0 13:25 592.08 1.80 204 88 81 2.30 2.31 25 16.0 20.0 13:29 595.42 1.80 199 88 81 2.30 2.31 26 20.0 24.0 13:33 598.61 1.75 198 89 82 2.23 2.25 27 24.0 28.0 13:37 601.90 1.85 196 89 82 2.36 2.39 28 28.0 32.0 13:41 605.31 1.80 195 90 82 2.30 2.32 2

1 32.0 36.0 14:23 608.66 1.85 200 81 81 2.36 2.39 22 36.0 40.0 14:27 612.09 1.80 199 82 81 2.30 2.32 23 40.0 44.0 14:31 615.32 1.90 201 84 81 2.43 2.45 24 44.0 48.0 14:35 618.94 1.80 207 86 81 2.30 2.32 25 48.0 52.0 14:39 622.32 1.80 205 87 81 2.30 2.32 26 52.0 56.0 14:43 625.93 1.70 205 88 82 2.17 2.19 27 56.0 60.0 14:47 629.25 1.70 203 88 82 2.17 2.19 28 60.0 64.0 14:51 632.60 1.75 199 89 82 2.23 2.25 2

64.0 14:55 636.08

Average: 53.98 1.80 201.4 86.4 81.3 2.29 2.31 2

Leak Check
































APPENDIX D 

Equipment Calibration 

Documents 




METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar

)

DATE: 8/30/2010 METER SERIAL #: C-5000 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.33 30.33 30.33 

METER PART #: MB3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT

3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ∆H (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vcr 

1 0.3367 16 696.810 702.190 5.380 81 80 83 80 81 81 12.00 0.62 5.3316 5.2 0.3367 16 702.190 707.570 5.380 81 83 86 81 83 83.25 12.00 0.62 5.3095 5.3 0.3367 16 707.570 712.980 5.410 82 86 88 83 84 85.25 12.00 0.62 5.3195 5.1 0.5057 16 713.050 718.340 5.290 83 88 91 85 86 87.5 8.00 1.4 5.1899 5.2 0.5057 16 718.340 724.320 5.980 85 91 93 86 87 89.25 9.00 1.4 5.8482 5.3 0.5057 16 724.320 730.320 6.0 83 93 92 87 88 90 9.00 1.4 5.8597 5.1 0.8778 16 730.570 737.510 6.940 85 95 98 89 90 93 6.00 4.5 6.7914 6.2 0.8778 16 737.510 744.470 6.960 85 98 99 90 91 94.5 6.00 4.5 6.7926 6.3 0.8778 16 744.470 751.450 6.980 86 99 101 91 92 95.75 6.00 4.5 6.7968 6.

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACT

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 

oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 

oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric) ∆H@ = 0.

Vcr

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

121832

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.

(

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm

( 13/ )6.

( ) 1

+ ∆

= ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K

∗ Θ

( ) = '∗

( )

( )

std

std

Vm

Vcr

Y =
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar

)

DATE: 11/22/2010 METER SERIAL #: C-5000 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.97 29.92 29.945 

METER PART #: MB3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT

3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ∆H (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vcr 

1 0.3367 16 126.20 131.085 4.885 66 67 69 67 67 67.5 11.00 0.62 4.9021 4.2 0.3367 16 131.085 136.430 5.345 65 69 71 67 68 68.75 12.00 0.62 5.3510 5.3 0.3367 16 136.430 141.320 4.890 66 71 72 68 69 70 11.00 0.62 4.8839 4.1 0.5057 16 141.40 147.310 5.910 66 70 74 69 70 70.75 9.00 1.5 5.9071 5.2 0.5057 16 147.310 152.560 5.250 66 74 76 70 71 72.75 8.00 1.5 5.2277 5.3 0.5057 16 152.560 157.820 5.260 66 76 76 71 71 73.5 8.00 1.5 5.2303 5.1 0.8778 16 157.930 165.935 8.005 66 75 80 71 72 74.5 7.00 4.6 8.0051 8.2 0.8778 16 165.935 172.815 6.880 66 80 81 72 73 76.5 6.00 4.6 6.8544 6.3 0.8778 16 172.815 179.710 6.895 66 81 81 73 74 77.25 6.00 4.6 6.8598 6.

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACT

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 

oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 

oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric) ∆H@ = 0.

Vcr

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

121832

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.

(

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm

( 13/ )6.

( ) 1

+ ∆

= ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K

∗ Θ

( ) = '∗

( )

( )

std

std

Vm

Vcr

Y =
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar

)

DATE: 8/30/2010 METER SERIAL #: CA 4 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.33 30.28 30.305 

METER PART #: MB4 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT

3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ∆H (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vc

1 0.6665 16 200.110 205.450 5.340 82 86 84 84 83 84.25 6.00 2.3 5.2774 52 0.6665 16 205.450 210.740 5.290 82 84 85 83 84 84 6.00 2.3 5.2304 53 0.6665 16 210.740 216.070 5.330 82 85 86 84 83 84.5 6.00 2.3 5.2651 51 0.5057 16 216.120 221.455 5.335 83 86 88 85 85 86 8.00 1.3 5.2429 52 0.5057 16 221.455 226.790 5.335 83 88 90 85 86 87.25 8.00 1.3 5.2309 53 0.5057 16 226.790 232.145 5.355 84 88 88 87 87 87.5 8.00 1.3 5.2481 51 0.3367 16 232.270 237.270 5.0 85 89 90 88 88 88.75 11.00 0.62 4.8810 42 0.3367 16 237.270 242.270 5.0 85 90 93 88 89 90 11.00 0.62 4.8699 43 0.3367 16 242.270 247.290 5.020 84 93 95 89 90 91.75 11.00 0.62 4.8738 4

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FAC

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 

oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 

oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric) ∆H@ = 0

Vc

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

241812

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.

(

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm

( 13/ )6.

( ) 1

+ ∆

= ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K

∗ Θ

( ) = '∗

( )

( )

std

std

Vm

Vcr

Y =
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar

)

DATE: 11/22/2010 METER SERIAL #: CA 4 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.97 29.92 29.945 

METER PART #: MB4 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT

3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ∆H (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vc

1 0.6665 16 679.340 685.465 6.125 68 68 67 68 67 67.5 7.00 2.3 6.1717 62 0.6665 16 685.465 690.715 5.250 65 67 68 67 67 67.25 6.00 2.3 5.2926 53 0.6665 16 690.715 696.835 6.120 65 68 69 67 67 67.75 7.00 2.3 6.1638 61 0.5057 16 713.870 719.790 5.920 66 69 69 68 68 68.5 9.00 1.4 5.9408 52 0.5057 16 719.790 725.050 5.260 66 68 69 68 68 68.25 8.00 1.4 5.2810 53 0.5057 16 725.050 732.250 7.20 66 69 69 68 68 68.5 11.00 1.4 7.2253 71 0.3367 16 696.880 702.220 5.340 66 67 68 67 67 67.25 12.00 0.61 5.3611 52 0.3367 16 702.220 707.120 4.90 66 68 69 67 67 67.75 11.00 0.61 4.9147 43 0.3367 16 707.120 713.810 6.690 66 69 70 67 68 68.5 15.00 0.61 6.7005 6

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FAC

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 

oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 

oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric) ∆H@ = 0

Vc

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

241812

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.

(

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm

( 13/ )6.

( ) 1

+ ∆

= ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K

∗ Θ

( ) = '∗

( )

( )

std

std

Vm

Vcr

Y =
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar

)

DATE: 9/8/2010 METER SERIAL #: 1672 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.67 30.67 30.67 

METER PART #: MB5 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT

3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ∆H (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vcr 

1 0.8778 16 546.40 553.240 6.840 78 78 78 78 78 78 6.00 3.75 6.9442 6.2 0.8778 16 553.240 560.090 6.850 78 78 78 78 78 78 6.00 3.75 6.9544 6.3 0.8778 16 560.090 566.890 6.80 78 78 79 78 79 78.5 6.00 3.75 6.8972 6.1 0.5057 16 564.640 570.560 5.920 78 79 81 79 79 79.5 9.00 1.2 5.9572 6.2 0.5057 16 570.560 576.480 5.920 78 81 82 79 79 80.25 9.00 1.2 5.9489 6.3 0.5057 16 576.480 582.420 5.940 79 82 84 79 80 81.25 9.00 1.2 5.9580 6.1 0.3367 16 582.420 587.790 5.370 79 83 83 80 80 81.5 12.00 0.52 5.3750 5.2 0.3367 16 587.790 593.160 5.370 79 83 83 80 81 81.75 12.00 0.52 5.3725 5.3 0.3367 16 593.160 598.530 5.370 79 83 83 81 81 82 12.00 0.52 5.370 5.

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACT

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 

oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 

oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric) ∆H@ = 0.

Vcr

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

321812

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.

(

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm

( 13/ )6.

( ) 1

+ ∆

= ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K

∗ Θ

( ) = '∗

( )

( )

std

std

Vm

Vcr

Y =
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar

)

DATE: 11/23/2010 METER SERIAL #: 1672 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.79 29.84 29.815 

METER PART #: MB5 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT

3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ∆H (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vcr 

1 0.8778 16 885.520 893.360 7.840 62 73 77 72 72 73.5 7.00 3.8 7.8058 8.2 0.8778 16 893.360 900.080 6.720 62 77 78 72 73 75 6.00 3.8 6.6719 6.3 0.8778 16 900.080 906.820 6.740 62 78 78 73 73 75.5 6.00 3.8 6.6855 6.1 0.5057 16 866.910 872.080 5.170 62 72 74 69 70 71.25 8.00 1.2 5.1364 5.2 0.5057 16 872.080 879.230 7.150 62 74 75 70 71 72.5 11.00 1.2 7.0869 7.3 0.5057 16 879.230 885.070 5.840 62 75 76 71 72 73.5 9.00 1.2 5.7776 5.1 0.3367 16 850.330 856.130 5.80 62 68 69 67 68 68 13.00 0.47 5.7874 5.2 0.3367 16 856.130 861.480 5.350 62 69 71 68 69 69.25 12.00 0.47 5.3258 5.3 0.3367 16 861.480 866.830 5.350 62 71 72 69 69 70.25 12.00 0.47 5.3157 5.

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACT

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 

oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 

oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric) ∆H@ = 0.

Vcr

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (

oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

321812

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.

(

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm

( 13/ )6.

( ) 1

+ ∆

= ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K

∗ Θ

( ) = '∗

( )

( )

std

std

Vm

Vcr

Y =





Parameter A

Test Run Date 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010 10/28/2010 10/28/2010Test Time 9:30 - 12:30 12:30 - 15:00 15:10 - 16:20 10:00 - 12:00 12:30 - 15:00 15:20 - 17:56 8:15 - 9:23 10:00 - 14:20

bag 1 bag 2 bag 3 bag 1 bag 2 bag 3 bag 1 bag 2

Oxygen concentration (%) 18.1 17.3 17.5 18.5 17.6 17.0 17.9 19.0 Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 18.1 17.4 17.5 18.5 17.7 17.0 18.0 19.0 Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.2 2.7 3.2 2.4 1.6 Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 2.4 1.6 CO2 Correction *

Co -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.08 -0.08 -0.08 -0.06 -0.06Cma 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10Cm 10.16 10.17 10.17 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.41 10.41O2 Correction *

Co -0.01 -0.03 -0.03 -0.04 -0.04 -0.04 -0.09 -0.09Cma 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97Cm 9.9 9.9 9.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.9 9.9

Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gases

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Cupola Exhaust Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results Summary

Isolatek International - Huntington, Indiana

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.16

Sampling Dates: October 26 - 28, 2010


APPENDIX E 

Laboratory Analytical 

Reports 
Your Project #: 10-3990.16 

Site: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON 

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/18

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F9886

Received: 2010/11/01, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (2 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/12 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) (2 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/16 

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/11/12 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F9886 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/18 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H U 0 5 9 1 H U 0 5 9 2 H U 0 5 9 3 H U 0 5 9 4 H U 0 5 9 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/27 2010/10/26

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

 U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM28 R2-OTM28 R3-OTM28 TRAIN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28 BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.1 0.5 2327430

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 0.30 2324162

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 20 1 2327434

Weight g 240 290 350 300 0.1 2326676

DCM Weight g 200 280 290 280 0.1 2326673

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 1.5 29 43 39 0.50 2329514

Organic Condensible PM mg 1.2 14 15 4.9 1.0 2326671

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H U 0 5 9 8 H U 0 5 9 9 H U 0 6 0 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/26 2010/10/26 2010/10/27

COC Number

 U n i t s R1-OTM27 R2-OTM27 R3-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 1.8 1.5 1.6 0.5 2327430

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 0.70 1.10 0.30 2324162

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 33 30 36 1 2327434

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F9886 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/18 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HU0591 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0592 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0593 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0594 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID R3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2326671 2010/11/12 2010/11/12 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2329514 2010/11/15 2010/11/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2326673 N/A 2010/11/12 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2326676 N/A 2010/11/12 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0597 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324162 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327430 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327434 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F9886 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/18 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HU0598 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324162 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327430 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327434 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0599 Collected 2010/10/26

Sample ID R2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324162 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327430 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327434 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Maxxam ID HU0600 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID R3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2324162 N/A 2010/11/12 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327430 2010/11/11 2010/11/17 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327434 N/A 2010/11/16 FMO

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F9886 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/18 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HU0591-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Oily material found in vial.

Sample HU0592-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HU0593-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HU0594-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027): Positive result found for reagent blank HU0597-02R, vial was observed to have a film of residue present

after evaporation.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F9886

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2326671 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 93 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 90 % 70 - 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 3.4 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/12 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2327430 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2329514 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/11/15 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6
Your Project #: 10-3990.16 

Site: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/12

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F5771

Received: 2010/11/01, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/08 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/10 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5771 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/12 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H R 9 8 8 8 H R 9 8 8 9 H R 9 8 9 0 H R 9 8 9 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 2010/10/28

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 4.0 4.7 8.0 0.5 2319792

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND 7.80 ND 8.40 0.30 2317080

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 98 120 110 110 1 2319794

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5771 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/12 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H R 9 8 8 8 H R 9 8 8 9 H R 9 8 8 9 H R 9 8 9 0 H R 9 8 9 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/28 2010/10/28

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND 3.7 3.4 2.0 2326777

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.52 0.40 4.0 4.0 5.6 6.0 2.0 2326777

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND ND 0.50 2326777

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.17 0.10 1.71 1.59 0.92 0.99 0.50 2326777

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 1.34 0.30 3.2 3.1 2.9 3.0 1.5 2326777

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 0.74 0.75 1.17 1.23 0.50 2326777

Total Lead (Pb) ug 0.87 0.20 10.8 10.9 23.6 23.4 1.0 2326777

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.07 0.75 101 99.3 80.7 127 3.8 2326777

Total Nickel (Ni) ug ND 0.50 ND ND 3.0 ND 2.5 2326777

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 86.7 89.6 87.0 153 5.0 2326777

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5771 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/12 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HR9888 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2319792 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2317080 N/A 2010/11/08 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2319794 N/A 2010/11/10 NUA

Maxxam ID HR9889 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2319792 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2317080 N/A 2010/11/08 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2319794 N/A 2010/11/10 NUA

Maxxam ID HR9889 D u p Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Maxxam ID HR9890 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2319792 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2317080 N/A 2010/11/08 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2319794 N/A 2010/11/10 NUA

Maxxam ID HR9891 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2326777 2010/11/11 2010/11/11 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2319792 2010/11/04 2010/11/10 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2317080 N/A 2010/11/08 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2319794 N/A 2010/11/10 NUA

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5771 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/12 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 5x dilution was required for all samples except HR9888, due to the matrix (high S content)

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HR9889

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F5771

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2319792 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/10 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2326777 N_R Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 102 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 6.3 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 97 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 4.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 97 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 98 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 92 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 3.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HR9889) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HR9889) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 5.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 104 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 4.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 98 % 85 - 115

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F5771

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2326777 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 93 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 3.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 4.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 3.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 1.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 1.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 0.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 1.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 0.3 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Page 7 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F5771

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2326777 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/11 1.2 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/11 1.3 % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/11 NC % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/11 3.3 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 8 of 8
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110910 Report

Date

Contact Name Phone

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

% Spike 

Recovery

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

80292 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 26.2 0.84 10/26/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80418 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 46.7 0.78 20 10/26/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80310 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 20.4 0.94 10/26/2010 Run 2, Trap A

70635 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 31.7 1.02 10 10/26/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80294 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 55.4 2.45 10/26/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80379 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 74.8 3.12 20 10/26/2010 Run 3, Trap B

70928 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.60 1.38 Blank, Trap A

80450 Huntington, IN 11/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 19.9 1.89 20 Blank, Trap B

Variability +- 10%

Calibration Report Available

(248)-548-8072 

Less than .031 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew 

Smith msmith@btecinc.com

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Plant/Source Isolatek Cupola Exhaust 

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/9/2010
Your Project #: 10-3990.16 

Site: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/11

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0F5783

Received: 2010/11/01, 14:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/09 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/08 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H R 9 9 5 1 H R 9 9 5 2 H R 9 9 5 3 H R 9 9 5 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 130 140 330 1 2324479

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 550 560 200 2324504

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 510 510 200 2324504

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H R 9 9 5 4 H R 9 9 5 5 H R 9 9 5 6

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27

COC Number N/A N/A

 U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 430 420 2324479 320 1 2322925

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.2 2318502

Hydrochloric Acid ug 810 500 2324504 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug 700 870 2324504 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H R 9 9 5 7 H R 9 9 5 8 H R 9 9 5 8 H R 9 9 5 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/27 2010/10/28

COC Number

 U n i t s BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN RUN RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 290 1 790 1 890 1 2322925

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.7 0.1 ND ND 2 ND 0.4 2318502

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H R 9 9 6 0

Sampling Date 2010/10/28

COC Number

 U n i t s RUN RDL QC Batch

3-M0061

Volume ml 800 1 2322925

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.4 2318502

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HR9951 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9952 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9953 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9953 D u p Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9954 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Maxxam ID HR9955 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2324504 2010/11/09 2010/11/09 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2324479 N/A 2010/11/09 A_S

Page 4 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HR9956 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Maxxam ID HR9957 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Maxxam ID HR9958 Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Maxxam ID HR9958 D u p Collected 2010/10/27

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Maxxam ID HR9959 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Maxxam ID HR9960 Collected 2010/10/28

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/01

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2318502 2010/11/03 2010/11/03 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2322925 N/A 2010/11/08 FMO

Page 5 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0F5783 Client Project #: 10-3990.16

Report Date: 2010/11/11 Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061): Samples are Improperly Preserved, measured pH<8.5

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.16

P.O. #:

Project name: ISOLATEK HUNTINGTON

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0F5783

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2318502 LLE Matrix Spike

(HR9958) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 99 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 96 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/11/03 NC % 20

2324504 A_S Matrix Spike

(HR9953) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/09 101 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/09 99 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/09 100 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/09 102 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/09 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/09 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/09 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/09 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 7
APPENDIX F 

Method 320 Analytical 

Report 
Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

Isolatek InternationalHuntington Indiana Cupolas 1 and 2 Cupolas 1 and 2

Measured Value 

(ppm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(ppmvd at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 318) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments

Run 1 10/26/2010 9:48 10/26/2010 10:48 12489 NA wet Method 318 ADL 1863.91 14,491 2.2 2.9 18.1 451

Run 2 10/26/2010 11:21 10/26/2010 12:21 13003 NA wet Method 318 ADL 1933.32 15,088 2.3 2.9 17.4 452Run 3 10/26/2010 12:42 10/26/2010 13:42 13704 NA wet Method 318 ADL 2029.84 15,901 2.3 2.8 18.5 453

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue 

Flow 

(ac

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Process 

Production 

Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Test End Time

Carbon Monoxide Emission Test Results

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Isolatek Method 318 Sheet.xls CO Emission Data-318 
Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source ID

Isolatek InternationalHuntington Indiana Cupolas 1 and 2 Cupolas 1 and 2

Measured Value 

(ppm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(ppmvd at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 318) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments

Run 1 10/26/2010 9:48 10/26/2010 10:48 53.1 NA wet Method 318 ADL 17.00 62 2.2 2.9 18.1 45

Run 2 10/26/2010 11:21 10/26/2010 12:21 58.1 NA wet Method 318 ADL 18.53 67 2.3 2.9 17.4 452Run 3 10/26/2010 12:42 10/26/2010 13:42 64.4 NA wet Method 318 ADL 20.46 75 2.3 2.8 18.5 453

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue 

Flow 

(ac

Process 

Production 

Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Test End Time

Carbonyl Sulfide Emission Test Results

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Isolatek Method 318 Sheet.xls COS Emission Data-318 
1200 N. Fancher · Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 · (989) 772-5088 · Fax (989) 772-5870 

Isolatek 

Huntington, Indiana 

FTIR Emission Testing 

October 26, 2010 

Project No. 1685

Prepared For 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

By 

Phillip J. Kauppi 

Chemist / FTIR Specialist 

November 17, 2010 
 

Isolatek 

Huntington, Indiana – FTIR Emission Testing 

October 26, 2010 

Project No. 1685 

Scope 

Prism Analytical Technologies, Inc. (PATI) was contracted by BT Environmental 

Consulting (Ferndale, MI) to conduct air testing for Isolatek (Huntington, IN). Cupola #1 

emissions were tested for gaseous carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon monoxide (CO). 

Testing was performed October 26, 2010. 

Extractive Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry following EPA Method 320 

was used to quantify gaseous emissions from Cupola #1. Lora Kralik (PATI) performed 

data collection. Phillip Kauppi (PATI) performed data validation, and report generation. 

 

Procedures 

FTIR data were collected using an MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR spectrometer, serial 

number 016252291. An 18”, 1⁄4” diameter, stainless steel probe was used to direct 

effluent gas from the stack to the FTIR. The probe was connected to a 100 ft., heated, 3/8 

inch transfer line, maintained at 191°C. A heated filter box (191°C) made the connection 

from the heated transfer line to the FTIR. A 0.1μ glass filter was used for particulate 

matter removal. 

The FTIR was equipped with a temperature-controlled, 5.11 meter multipass gas cell 

maintained at 191°C. Gas flows and sampling system pressures were monitored using a 

rotometer and pressure transducer. All data were collected at 0.5 cm-1 resolution. Each 

spectrum was derived from the coaddition of 60 scans, with a new data point generated 

every minute. 

A calibration transfer standard (CTS), 100.0 ppm ethylene gas standard (Airgas, cylinder 

#CC156258), was analyzed before and after the three test runs. The concentration 

determined for all CTS runs were within ± 5% of the certified value of the standard. The 

ethylene was passed through the entire system (system purge) to determine the sampling 

system response time and to ensure that the sampling system was leak-free at the stack 

location. Nitrogen was purged through the sampling system to confirm the system was 

free of contaminants. See the FTIR QA/QC appendix for results. 

Direct measurements of carbon monoxide (The American Gas Group, cylinder 

#CC56451) and ethylene gas standards were made to confirm standard concentrations. 
prism analytical technologies, inc. 

Isolatek, Huntington, IN – FTIR Emission Monitoring, October 26, 2010 

Project No. 1685 

 page 2 

The carbon monoxide standard was passed through the sampling system to determine the 

response time and confirm recovery. See the FTIR QA/QC Appendix for results. 

Carbon monoxide spiking was performed in ambient air to verify the ability of the 

sampling system to quantitatively deliver a sample containing carbon monoxide from the 

base of the probe to the FTIR. The native carbon monoxide concentrations from Cupola 

#1 changed widely over short periods of time, thus making it making difficult, if not 

impossible, to perform carbon monoxide spiking at the cupola using one FTIR. For these 

reasons, carbon monoxide spiking was performed in ambient air. 

Samples from ambient air were measured to determine carbon monoxide concentrations 

to be used in the spike recovery calculations. The water (H2O) concentrations of the 

spiked and unspiked samples were used to determine the dilution factor and thus 

determine the spiked concentration and expected result. See the Spike Calculation below. 

ܨܦ ൌ 1 െ ௑ሺ௦௣௞ሻ

௑ሺ௡௔௧௜௩௘ሻ (Where X = H2O)

ܥܵ ൌ ܨܦ כ ܵ݌݅݇݁ሺ݀݅ݎሻ ൅ ܷ݊݌ݏ݅݇݁ሺ1 െ ܨܦሻ (Sec. 9.2.3 (4) USEPA Method 320) 

DF = Dilution Factor of the spike gas 

Spike(dir) = Analyte concentration of the undiluted spike gas 

CS = Expected concentration of the spiked samples 

Unspike = Native concentration of analytes in unspiked samples 

X(spk) = Concentration of spiked H2O 

X(native) = Concentration of native H2O 

Analyte spikes were introduced using an instrument grade stainless steel rotometer. The 

spike target dilution ratio was 1:10 or less. All carbon monoxide spike recoveries were 

within the EPA Method allowance of ±30%. See Spike Summary Appendix for results. 

As part of the data validation procedure, reference spectra are manually fit to that of the 

sample spectra and a concentration is determined. The reference spectra are scaled to 

match the peak amplitude of the sample, thus providing a scale factor. The scale factor 

multiplied by the reference spectra concentration is used to determine the concentration 

value for the sample spectra. Sample pressure and temperature corrections are then 

applied to compute the final sample concentration. The manually calculated results are 

then compared with the software-generated results. The data is then validated if the two 

concentrations are within ± 5% agreement. If there is a difference greater than ± 5% the 

spectra are reviewed for possible spectra interferences or any other possible causes 

leading to misquantified data. 
prism analytical technologies, inc. 

Isolatek, Huntington, IN – FTIR Emission Monitoring, October 26, 2010 

Project No. 1685 

 page 3 

Results and Discussion 

Detection Limits

The detection limit of each analyte was calculated following Annex A2 of ASTM 

D6348-3 procedure using spectra that contained similar amounts of moisture. 

Table 1 - FTIR Detection Limits 

Analyte Carbonyl Sulfide Carbon Monoxide 

Det. Lim. (ppmv wet) 1.0 0.2 

Cupola #1

 

Three, 3-hour test runs were performed at Cupola #1 on October 26, 2010 (See Table 2 

for Test Run detail). Carbonyl sulfide and carbon monoxide were detected during the 

three test runs. Analyte spiking was performed before each run to confirm the 

measurement system’s ability to deliver and quantify carbon monoxide (See FTIR 

QA/QC Appendix for results). All concentration data were calculated on a wet volume 

basis. The sample and data collection followed the procedures outlined in USEPA 

Method 320 and PATI’s SOP 207. See the Test Run Data - Cupola #1 appendix for all 

concentration data. 

Table 2 – Summary of FTIR Data, Cupola #1 

Test Run 1 

9:48 – 10:48, 10/26/2010 

Carbonyl Sulfide 

(ppmv wet) 

Carbon Monoxide 

(ppmv wet) 

Minimum 15.3 5,480

Maximum 99.5 21,445

Average 53.1 12,489

Test Run 2 

11:21 – 12:21, 10/26/2010 

Carbonyl Sulfide 

(ppmv wet) 

Carbon Monoxide 

(ppmv wet) 

Minimum 28.9 7,898

Maximum 105.2 19,629

Average 58.1 13,003

Test Run 3 

12:42 – 13:42, 10/26/2010 

Carbonyl Sulfide 

(ppmv wet) 

Carbon Monoxide 

(ppmv wet) 

Minimum 38.3 8,406

Maximum 99.5 20,895

Average 64.4 13,704
prism analytical technologies, inc. 

Isolatek, Huntington, IN – FTIR Emission Monitoring, October 26, 2010 

Project No. 1685 

 page 4 

The following appendices include FTIR data and QA/QC procedures: 

- Test Run Data - Cupola #1 

- QA/QC Data – Cupola #1 

- Gas Certificates and Field Notes 

Phillip J. Kauppi (electronic)________ Date: November 17, 2010

Phillip J. Kauppi 

Chemist / FTIR Specialist 

Isolatek_Prj_1685_RPT.doc 
APPENDIX 

Test Run Data - Cupola #1 

 
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR Data ‐ Test Run 1

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C)

FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R1_C1_000121.LAB 10/26/2010 9:47:54 43.8 9940.6 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000122.LAB 10/26/2010 9:48:55 44.7 10074.3 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000123.LAB 10/26/2010 9:49:55 79.5 17465.9 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000124.LAB 10/26/2010 9:50:56 99.5 20460.7 190.8 0.928

R1_C1_000125.LAB 10/26/2010 9:51:57 97.6 20466.8 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000126.LAB 10/26/2010 9:52:58 94.9 20545.3 190.9 0.928

R1_C1_000127.LAB 10/26/2010 9:53:58 78.0 18874.3 190.9 0.928

R1_C1_000128.LAB 10/26/2010 9:54:59 52.5 15042.2 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000129.LAB 10/26/2010 9:56:00 31.3 10550.9 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000130.LAB 10/26/2010 9:57:01 15.3 5480.4 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000131.LAB 10/26/2010 9:58:01 38.1 9928.2 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000132.LAB 10/26/2010 9:59:02 55.5 11682.5 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000133.LAB 10/26/2010 10:00:03 54.0 11105.3 190.8 0.928

R1_C1_000134.LAB 10/26/2010 10:01:03 53.8 10644.3 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000135.LAB 10/26/2010 10:02:04 51.3 10249.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000136.LAB 10/26/2010 10:03:05 46.7 9883.2 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000137.LAB 10/26/2010 10:04:06 63.0 13152.1 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000138.LAB 10/26/2010 10:05:06 78.6 16076.5 190.8 0.928

R1_C1_000139.LAB 10/26/2010 10:06:07 68.2 14100.8 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000140.LAB 10/26/2010 10:07:08 59.0 12819.4 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000141.LAB 10/26/2010 10:08:09 49.1 12093.4 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000142.LAB 10/26/2010 10:09:09 42.2 11524.2 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000143.LAB 10/26/2010 10:10:10 36.1 10975.6 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000144.LAB 10/26/2010 10:11:11 20.1 6926.3 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000145.LAB 10/26/2010 10:12:11 52.8 12387.7 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000146.LAB 10/26/2010 10:13:12 52.1 12045.7 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000147.LAB 10/26/2010 10:14:13 55.7 12614.3 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000148.LAB 10/26/2010 10:15:14 58.4 13129.2 190.9 0.926

R1 C1 000149 LAB R1_C1_000149.LAB 10/26/2010 10:16:15 60.8 13559.5 190.9 0.926 10/26/2010 10 16 15 60 8 13559 5 190 9 0 926

R1_C1_000150.LAB 10/26/2010 10:17:15 60.2 13744.4 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000151.LAB 10/26/2010 10:18:16 75.9 17285.9 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000152.LAB 10/26/2010 10:19:17 99.2 21445.1 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000153.LAB 10/26/2010 10:20:17 93.5 19915.2 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000154.LAB 10/26/2010 10:21:18 91.9 19683.3 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000155.LAB 10/26/2010 10:22:19 67.5 16236.8 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000156.LAB 10/26/2010 10:23:20 57.8 15317.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000157.LAB 10/26/2010 10:24:20 40.7 11948.2 190.8 0.925

R1_C1_000158.LAB 10/26/2010 10:25:21 24.5 8346.0 190.9 0.926

R1_C1_000159.LAB 10/26/2010 10:26:22 18.0 6083.1 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000160.LAB 10/26/2010 10:27:22 45.3 12004.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000161.LAB 10/26/2010 10:28:23 43.1 11070.2 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000162.LAB 10/26/2010 10:29:24 41.3 10488.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000163.LAB 10/26/2010 10:30:25 38.6 10094.0 190.9 0.925

R1_C1_000164.LAB 10/26/2010 10:31:25 38.1 9824.7 190.8 0.925

R1_C1_000165.LAB 10/26/2010 10:32:26 36.9 9544.8 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000166.LAB 10/26/2010 10:33:27 38.8 9807.3 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000167.LAB 10/26/2010 10:34:27 47.3 11048.7 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000168.LAB 10/26/2010 10:35:28 69.2 16094.6 190.8 0.925

R1_C1_000169.LAB 10/26/2010 10:36:29 57.2 13356.9 190.8 0.926

R1_C1_000170.LAB 10/26/2010 10:37:30 50.9 12433.8 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000171.LAB 10/26/2010 10:38:30 45.0 11513.3 190.8 0.925

R1_C1_000172.LAB 10/26/2010 10:39:31 40.1 11066.3 190.8 0.927

R1_C1_000173.LAB 10/26/2010 10:40:32 32.3 9703.7 190.9 0.928

Prj No 1685
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR Data ‐ Test Run 1

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C)

FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R1_C1_000174.LAB 10/26/2010 10:41:32 36.6 9930.5 190.9 0.927

R1_C1_000175.LAB 10/26/2010 10:42:33 51.7 11269.3 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000176.LAB 10/26/2010 10:43:34 49.7 10779.6 190.9 0.928

R1_C1_000177.LAB 10/26/2010 10:44:35 44.1 10003.7 190.9 0.928

R1_C1_000178.LAB 10/26/2010 10:45:35 45.6 10359.9 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000179.LAB 10/26/2010 10:46:36 43.4 9578.2 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000180.LAB 10/26/2010 10:47:37 42.4 9440.5 190.9 0.929

R1_C1_000181.LAB 10/26/2010 10:48:38 37.1 8598.0 190.9 0.927

Minimum 15.3 5480.4

Maximum 99.5 21445.1

Average 53.1 12488.8

Prj No 1685
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR Data ‐ Test Run 2

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C)

FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R2_C1_000222.LAB 10/26/2010 11:21:11 56.3 14132.1 190.8 0.930

R2_C1_000223.LAB 10/26/2010 11:22:11 49.6 13126.2 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000224.LAB 10/26/2010 11:23:12 32.4 9318.9 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000225.LAB 10/26/2010 11:24:13 28.9 7898.4 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000226.LAB 10/26/2010 11:25:13 54.7 12431.0 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000227.LAB 10/26/2010 11:26:14 50.3 11017.7 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000228.LAB 10/26/2010 11:27:15 51.5 11075.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000229.LAB 10/26/2010 11:28:16 50.9 10712.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000230.LAB 10/26/2010 11:29:16 49.4 10405.1 190.8 0.930

R2_C1_000231.LAB 10/26/2010 11:30:17 83.2 17167.1 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000232.LAB 10/26/2010 11:31:18 100.9 19048.0 190.9 0.929

R2_C1_000233.LAB 10/26/2010 11:32:18 89.4 17796.2 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000234.LAB 10/26/2010 11:33:19 75.6 15803.8 190.8 0.930

R2_C1_000235.LAB 10/26/2010 11:34:20 64.8 14211.6 190.8 0.930

R2_C1_000236.LAB 10/26/2010 11:35:21 56.3 12774.8 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000237.LAB 10/26/2010 11:36:21 49.8 11993.7 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000238.LAB 10/26/2010 11:37:22 45.2 11265.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000239.LAB 10/26/2010 11:38:23 56.2 12165.2 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000240.LAB 10/26/2010 11:39:24 62.0 12723.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000241.LAB 10/26/2010 11:40:24 60.8 12567.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000242.LAB 10/26/2010 11:41:25 55.1 11919.9 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000243.LAB 10/26/2010 11:42:26 53.4 12022.0 190.9 0.929

R2_C1_000244.LAB 10/26/2010 11:43:26 52.0 12043.3 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000245.LAB 10/26/2010 11:44:27 79.2 17476.3 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000246.LAB 10/26/2010 11:45:28 67.3 14900.9 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000247.LAB 10/26/2010 11:46:29 61.6 14138.4 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000248.LAB 10/26/2010 11:47:29 58.8 13730.2 190.8 0.929

R2_C1_000249.LAB 10/26/2010 11:48:30 52.2 13209.7 190.9 0.928

R2 C1 000250 LAB R2_C1_000250.LAB 10/26/2010 11:49:31 47.9 13120.9 190.9 0.929 10/26/2010 11 49 31 47 9 13120 9 190 9 0 929

R2_C1_000251.LAB 10/26/2010 11:50:32 41.2 12729.4 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000252.LAB 10/26/2010 11:51:32 29.3 10559.8 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000253.LAB 10/26/2010 11:52:33 44.1 12159.7 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000254.LAB 10/26/2010 11:53:34 48.4 12518.5 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000255.LAB 10/26/2010 11:54:34 49.7 12534.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000256.LAB 10/26/2010 11:55:35 53.6 13024.8 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000257.LAB 10/26/2010 11:56:36 53.4 12710.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000258.LAB 10/26/2010 11:57:37 64.9 15303.7 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000259.LAB 10/26/2010 11:58:37 79.7 17427.5 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000260.LAB 10/26/2010 11:59:38 70.2 15594.4 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000261.LAB 10/26/2010 12:00:39 59.7 14023.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000262.LAB 10/26/2010 12:01:40 50.0 12345.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000263.LAB 10/26/2010 12:02:41 45.3 11625.8 190.8 0.932

R2_C1_000264.LAB 10/26/2010 12:03:41 43.1 11361.3 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000265.LAB 10/26/2010 12:04:42 46.2 11196.2 190.8 0.931

R2_C1_000266.LAB 10/26/2010 12:05:42 58.3 11542.0 190.8 0.931

R2_C1_000267.LAB 10/26/2010 12:06:43 58.6 10843.3 190.8 0.932

R2_C1_000268.LAB 10/26/2010 12:07:44 56.6 10174.5 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000269.LAB 10/26/2010 12:08:45 57.3 10131.1 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000270.LAB 10/26/2010 12:09:45 56.8 10358.8 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000271.LAB 10/26/2010 12:10:46 56.5 11558.4 190.9 0.930

R2_C1_000272.LAB 10/26/2010 12:11:47 105.2 19629.2 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000273.LAB 10/26/2010 12:12:48 100.5 19007.2 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000274.LAB 10/26/2010 12:13:48 90.2 17781.2 190.9 0.931

Prj No 1685
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR Data ‐ Test Run 2

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C)

FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R2_C1_000275.LAB 10/26/2010 12:14:49 74.4 15628.2 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000276.LAB 10/26/2010 12:15:50 67.8 15022.0 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000277.LAB 10/26/2010 12:16:50 57.1 13591.7 190.9 0.932

R2_C1_000278.LAB 10/26/2010 12:17:51 45.6 11753.6 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000279.LAB 10/26/2010 12:18:52 40.7 11417.8 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000280.LAB 10/26/2010 12:19:53 40.1 9719.4 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000281.LAB 10/26/2010 12:20:53 50.8 9864.2 190.9 0.931

R2_C1_000282.LAB 10/26/2010 12:21:54 52.4 9827.7 190.9 0.932

Minimum 28.9 7898.4

Maximum 105.2 19629.2

Average 58.1 13002.6

Prj No 1685
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR Data ‐ Test Run 3

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C)

FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R3_C1_000317.LAB 10/26/2010 12:41:57 66.1 14810.1 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000318.LAB 10/26/2010 12:42:57 57.1 13249.5 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000319.LAB 10/26/2010 12:43:58 55.0 12988.8 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000320.LAB 10/26/2010 12:44:59 49.1 12267.7 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000321.LAB 10/26/2010 12:46:00 44.9 11961.1 190.9 0.933

R3_C1_000322.LAB 10/26/2010 12:47:00 44.8 12362.3 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000323.LAB 10/26/2010 12:48:01 38.3 11000.0 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000324.LAB 10/26/2010 12:49:02 45.0 10757.3 190.8 0.932

R3_C1_000325.LAB 10/26/2010 12:50:02 55.7 12019.9 190.8 0.931

R3_C1_000326.LAB 10/26/2010 12:51:03 53.4 11545.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000327.LAB 10/26/2010 12:52:04 53.2 10957.5 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000328.LAB 10/26/2010 12:53:05 52.3 10735.2 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000329.LAB 10/26/2010 12:54:05 52.6 10713.2 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000330.LAB 10/26/2010 12:55:06 49.5 10439.4 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000331.LAB 10/26/2010 12:56:07 84.2 17705.9 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000332.LAB 10/26/2010 12:57:08 80.1 17001.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000333.LAB 10/26/2010 12:58:08 77.3 16893.3 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000334.LAB 10/26/2010 12:59:09 73.4 16833.5 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000335.LAB 10/26/2010 13:00:10 66.5 15982.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000336.LAB 10/26/2010 13:01:10 55.8 14374.7 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000337.LAB 10/26/2010 13:02:11 57.0 15235.2 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000338.LAB 10/26/2010 13:03:12 50.0 12605.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000339.LAB 10/26/2010 13:04:13 55.1 11465.6 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000340.LAB 10/26/2010 13:05:13 55.9 11364.0 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000341.LAB 10/26/2010 13:06:14 55.6 10831.6 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000342.LAB 10/26/2010 13:07:15 56.7 10665.9 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000343.LAB 10/26/2010 13:08:15 55.7 10469.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000344.LAB 10/26/2010 13:09:16 53.5 10269.0 190.8 0.933

R3 C1 000345 LAB R3_C1_000345.LAB 10/26/2010 13:10:17 67.8 14549.7 190.9 0.931 10/26/2010 13 10 17 67 8 14549 7 190 9 0 931

R3_C1_000346.LAB 10/26/2010 13:11:18 96.2 20026.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000347.LAB 10/26/2010 13:12:18 99.5 20895.1 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000348.LAB 10/26/2010 13:13:19 94.8 20681.3 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000349.LAB 10/26/2010 13:14:20 88.5 20030.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000350.LAB 10/26/2010 13:15:20 81.4 19448.5 190.9 0.930

R3_C1_000351.LAB 10/26/2010 13:16:21 62.1 16724.0 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000352.LAB 10/26/2010 13:17:22 40.4 11847.0 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000353.LAB 10/26/2010 13:18:23 41.6 10539.0 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000354.LAB 10/26/2010 13:19:23 56.8 10025.1 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000355.LAB 10/26/2010 13:20:24 52.3 9137.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000356.LAB 10/26/2010 13:21:25 51.2 8575.6 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000357.LAB 10/26/2010 13:22:26 52.1 8406.2 190.9 0.933

R3_C1_000358.LAB 10/26/2010 13:23:26 50.4 8527.1 190.8 0.931

R3_C1_000359.LAB 10/26/2010 13:24:27 46.6 8680.0 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000360.LAB 10/26/2010 13:25:28 81.9 16959.5 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000361.LAB 10/26/2010 13:26:28 92.9 18932.3 190.8 0.932

R3_C1_000362.LAB 10/26/2010 13:27:29 93.8 18700.4 190.8 0.933

R3_C1_000363.LAB 10/26/2010 13:28:30 87.7 17884.2 190.8 0.932

R3_C1_000364.LAB 10/26/2010 13:29:31 83.7 17364.1 190.8 0.931

R3_C1_000365.LAB 10/26/2010 13:30:31 78.8 16878.2 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000366.LAB 10/26/2010 13:31:32 73.5 16489.4 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000367.LAB 10/26/2010 13:32:33 53.7 12196.0 190.8 0.931

R3_C1_000368.LAB 10/26/2010 13:33:33 70.5 13525.0 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000369.LAB 10/26/2010 13:34:34 65.2 12253.3 190.9 0.932

Prj No 1685
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR Data ‐ Test Run 3

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

FTIR Gas Cell

Temp (C)

FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm)

R3_C1_000370.LAB 10/26/2010 13:35:35 57.8 10741.1 190.8 0.932

R3_C1_000371.LAB 10/26/2010 13:36:36 54.6 10188.9 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000372.LAB 10/26/2010 13:37:36 48.3 9481.5 190.9 0.933

R3_C1_000373.LAB 10/26/2010 13:38:37 46.5 9169.8 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000374.LAB 10/26/2010 13:39:38 81.0 15469.9 190.9 0.933

R3_C1_000375.LAB 10/26/2010 13:40:39 91.6 17369.6 190.9 0.931

R3_C1_000376.LAB 10/26/2010 13:41:39 94.5 18218.7 190.9 0.932

R3_C1_000377.LAB 10/26/2010 13:42:40 94.5 18502.3 190.8 0.933

Minimum 38.3 8406.2

Maximum 99.5 20895.1

Average 64.4 13703.6

Prj No 1685
APPENDIX 

QA/QC Data – Cupola #1 

 
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

< 1 2 < 8

Nitrogen Direct to FTIR

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

N2_DIR_000001.LAB 10/26/2010 7:43:02 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000002.LAB 10/26/2010 7:43:18 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000003.LAB 10/26/2010 7:43:33 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000004BKG.LAB 10/26/2010 7:45:47 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000005.LAB 10/26/2010 7:46:05 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene Direct Purge

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

Ethylene Recovery

(%)

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000006.LAB 10/26/2010 7:49:39 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.7 98.7%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000007.LAB 10/26/2010 7:49:54 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.7 98.7%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000008.LAB 10/26/2010 7:50:10 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.9 98.9%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000009.LAB 10/26/2010 7:50:26 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.8 98.8%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000010.LAB 10/26/2010 7:50:41 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.5 98.5%

100.0PPM_CTS_DIR_000011.LAB 10/26/2010 7:50:57 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 98.8 98.8%

2423 ppm Carbon Monoxide Direct Purge

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

2423PPM_CO_DIR_000012.LAB 10/26/2010 7:53:59 < 1 2348.7 < 0.05 < 0.5 96.9%

2423PPM_CO_DIR_000013.LAB 10/26/2010 7:54:14 < 1 2351.2 < 0.05 < 0.5 97.0%

2423PPM_CO_DIR_000014.LAB 10/26/2010 7:54:30 < 1 2350.4 < 0.05 < 0.5 97.0%

2423PPM_CO_DIR_000015.LAB 10/26/2010 7:54:46 < 1 2343.6 < 0.05 < 0.5 96.7%

2423 ppm Carbon Monoxide System Purge and Response Time Test (using determined direct CO concentration as expected concentration)

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

Response Time*

(sec)

CO_RESP_000016.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:09 < 1 < 0.2 2.135 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CO_RESP_000017.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:13 < 1 0 5. 2.085 < 0 5. 0 0.% 8

CO_RESP_000018.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:17 < 1 602.4 1.055 < 0.5 25.6% 12

CO_RESP_000019.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:21 < 1 2134.8 0.282 < 0.5 90.8% 16

CO_RESP_000020.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:24 < 1 2175.9 0.174 < 0.5 92.6% 20

CO_RESP_000021.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:28 < 1 2182.7 0.152 < 0.5 92.9% 24

CO_RESP_000022.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:32 < 1 2175.4 0.140 < 0.5 92.6% 28

CO_RESP_000023.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:36 < 1 2163.8 0.117 < 0.5 92.1% 31

CO_RESP_000024.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:40 < 1 2161.7 0.130 < 0.5 92.0% 35

CO_RESP_000025.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:44 < 1 2169.5 0.114 < 0.5 92.3% 39

CO_RESP_000026.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:48 < 1 2178.3 0.085 < 0.5 92.7% 43

CO_RESP_000027.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:52 < 1 2142.0 0.100 < 0.5 91.1% 47

CO_RESP_000028.LAB 10/26/2010 8:00:56 < 1 2119.4 0.078 < 0.5 90.2% 51

CO_RESP_000029.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:00 < 1 2138.8 0.102 < 0.5 91.0% 55

CO_RESP_000030.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:04 < 1 2126.1 0.089 < 0.5 90.5% 59

CO_RESP_000031.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:08 < 1 2137.4 0.078 < 0.5 91.0% 63

CO_RESP_000032.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:11 < 1 2166.8 0.079 < 0.5 92.2% 67

CO_RESP_000033.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:15 < 1 2185.2 0.080 < 0.5 93.0% 71

CO_RESP_000034.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:19 < 1 2220.2 0.072 < 0.5 94.5% 75

CO_RESP_000035.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:23 < 1 2235.0 0.081 < 0.5 95.1% 78

CO_RESP_000036.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:27 < 1 2226.6 0.081 < 0.5 94.8%

CO_RESP_000037.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:31 < 1 2217.6 0.064 < 0.5 94.4%

CO_RESP_000038.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:35 < 1 2234.7 0.080 < 0.5 95.1%

CO_RESP_000039.LAB 10/26/2010 8:01:39 < 1 2236.8 0.095 < 0.5 95.2%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Prj No 1685
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

: < 1 < 1 <

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

Ethylene Recovery

(%)

Response Time*

(sec)

CTS_RESP_000040.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:20 < 1 3.6 1.923 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CTS_RESP_000041.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:24 < 1 309.7 1.457 < 0.5 0.0% 8

CTS_RESP_000042.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:28 < 1 454.1 0.302 57.0 57.0% 12

CTS_RESP_000043.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:32 < 1 24.6 0.149 96.4 96.4% 16

CTS_RESP_000044.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:36 < 1 4.7 0.116 98.1 98.1%

CTS_RESP_000045.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:40 < 1 2.5 0.090 98.0 98.0%

CTS_RESP_000046.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:44 < 1 1.6 0.085 98.1 98.1%

CTS_RESP_000047.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:48 < 1 1.7 0.083 97.9 97.9%

CTS_RESP_000048.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:52 < 1 1.2 0.052 97.7 97.7%

CTS_RESP_000049.LAB 10/26/2010 8:03:55 < 1 0.9 0.068 97.8 97.8%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

N2_SYS_000057.LAB 10/26/2010 8:06:16 < 1 0.7 0.063 < 0.5

N2_SYS_000058.LAB 10/26/2010 8:06:32 < 1 0.4 0.062 < 0.5

N2_SYS_000059.LAB 10/26/2010 8:06:47 < 1 0.8 0.062 < 0.5

Ambient Air, Prior to Anylte Spike #1

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

AMBIENT_AIR_000060.LAB 10/26/2010 8:11:24 < 1 4.2 1.933 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000061.LAB 10/26/2010 8:11:40 < 1 0.6 1.942 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000062.LAB 10/26/2010 8:11:55 < 1 0.6 1.933 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000063.LAB 10/26/2010 8:12:11 < 1 0.4 1.922 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000064.LAB 10/26/2010 8:12:27 < 1 0.4 1.943 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000065.LAB 10/26/2010 8:12:42 < 1 0.4 1.930 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000066.LAB 10/26/2010 8:12:58 < 1 < 0 2. 1.948 < 0 5.

Ambient Air Analyte Spike #1 ‐ Using 2423 ppm CO

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Dilution Factor

Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

CO_SPK_AMB_000067.LAB 10/26/2010 8:16:59 < 1 188.9 1.809 < 0.5 0.066 118.8%

CO_SPK_AMB_000068.LAB 10/26/2010 8:17:15 < 1 189.1 1.802 < 0.5 0.069 112.4%

CO_SPK_AMB_000069.LAB 10/26/2010 8:17:30 < 1 190.5 1.809 < 0.5 0.066 119.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000070.LAB 10/26/2010 8:17:46 < 1 189.6 1.801 < 0.5 0.070 112.5%

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

Ethylene Recovery

(%)

Response Time*

(sec)

CTS_RESP_000182.LAB 10/26/2010 10:49:46 65.6 14880.3 2.625 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CTS_RESP_000183.LAB 10/26/2010 10:49:50 59.1 13629.0 2.641 < 0.5 0.0% 8

CTS_RESP_000184.LAB 10/26/2010 10:49:54 8.4 2067.0 2.429 18.5 18.5% 12

CTS_RESP_000185.LAB 10/26/2010 10:49:58 1.2 229.8 0.384 91.2 91.2% 16

CTS_RESP_000186.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:02 < 1 69.3 0.135 97.8 97.8% 20

CTS_RESP_000187.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:06 < 1 42.9 0.090 98.7 98.7%

CTS_RESP_000188.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:10 < 1 31.8 0.057 97.7 97.7%

CTS_RESP_000189.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:13 < 1 25.9 0.062 97.9 97.9%

CTS_RESP_000190.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:17 < 1 22.4 0.052 98.6 98.6%

CTS_RESP_000191.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:21 < 1 19.6 < 0.05 97.8 97.8%

CTS_RESP_000192.LAB 10/26/2010 10:50:25 < 1 18.2 < 0.05 98.7 98.7%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Prj No 1685
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

: : 7 0 8

Ambient Air, Prior to Anylte Spike #2

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

AMBIENT_AIR_000201.LAB 10/26/2010 10:59:56 < 1 4.0 1.913 0.7

AMBIENT_AIR_000202.LAB 10/26/2010 11:00:12 < 1 3.2 1.873 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000203.LAB 10/26/2010 11:00:28 < 1 3.3 1.876 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000204.LAB 10/26/2010 11:00:43 < 1 5.6 1.863 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000205.LAB 10/26/2010 11:00:59 < 1 3.7 1.838 < 0.5

Ambient Air Analyte Spike #2 ‐ Using 2423 ppm CO

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Dilution Factor

Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

CO_SPK_AMB_000207.LAB 10/26/2010 11:08:25 < 1 193.1 1.743 < 0.5 0.069 115.4%

CO_SPK_AMB_000208.LAB 10/26/2010 11:08:41 < 1 192.5 1.737 < 0.5 0.072 109.6%

CO_SPK_AMB_000209.LAB 10/26/2010 11:08:56 < 1 194.1 1.703 < 0.5 0.091 88.2%

CO_SPK_AMB_000210.LAB 10/26/2010 11:09:12 < 1 194.0 1.723 < 0.5 0.080 100.2%

CO_SPK_AMB_000211.LAB 10/26/2010 11:09:28 < 1 194.9 1.712 < 0.5 0.086 93.5%

CO_SPK_AMB_000212.LAB 10/26/2010 11:09:43 < 1 187.2 1.734 < 0.5 0.074 104.3%

CO_SPK_AMB_000213.LAB 10/26/2010 11:09:59 < 1 188.6 1.732 < 0.5 0.075 103.3%

CO_SPK_AMB_000214.LAB 10/26/2010 11:10:15 < 1 189.9 1.735 < 0.5 0.073 106.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000215.LAB 10/26/2010 11:10:30 < 1 194.7 1.739 < 0.5 0.071 112.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000216.LAB 10/26/2010 11:10:46 < 1 195.5 1.741 < 0.5 0.070 115.1%

CO_SPK_AMB_000217.LAB 10/26/2010 11:11:02 < 1 196.5 1.730 < 0.5 0.076 106.3%

CO_SPK_AMB_000218.LAB 10/26/2010 11:11:17 < 1 196.1 1.744 < 0.5 0.069 117.7%

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

Ethylene Recovery

(%)

Response Time*

(sec)

CTS_RESP_000283.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:12 54.1 9724.4 1.827 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CTS_RESP_000284.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:16 49.2 9409.7 1.857 < 0.5 0.0% 8

CTS_RESP_000285.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:19 8.0 2311.3 1.907 12.8 12.8% 12

CTS_RESP_000286.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:23 1 1. 252.7 0.341 88.8 88.8% 16

CTS_RESP_000287.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:27 < 1 63.2 0.087 97.1 97.1% 20

CTS_RESP_000288.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:31 < 1 36.6 0.070 97.6 97.6%

CTS_RESP_000289.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:35 < 1 26.9 0.059 97.6 97.6%

CTS_RESP_000290.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:39 < 1 21.1 0.056 98.7 98.7%

CTS_RESP_000291.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:43 < 1 17.7 < 0.05 98.1 98.1%

CTS_RESP_000292.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:47 < 1 16.2 < 0.05 98.5 98.5%

CTS_RESP_000293.LAB 10/26/2010 12:24:51 < 1 14.8 0.051 98.7 98.7%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Ambient Air, Prior to Anylte Spike #3

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

AMBIENT_AIR_000306.LAB 10/26/2010 12:28:25 < 1 3.0 1.333 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000307.LAB 10/26/2010 12:28:41 < 1 3.7 1.371 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000308.LAB 10/26/2010 12:28:57 < 1 2.9 1.378 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000309.LAB 10/26/2010 12:29:12 < 1 3.1 1.363 < 0.5

Ambient Air Analyte Spike #3 ‐ Using 2423 ppm CO

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Dilution Factor

Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

CO_SPK_AMB_000310.LAB 10/26/2010 12:32:04 < 1 141.4 1.280 < 0.5 0.060 97.6%

CO_SPK_AMB_000311.LAB 10/26/2010 12:32:20 < 1 141.4 1.288 < 0.5 0.054 107.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000312.LAB 10/26/2010 12:32:35 < 1 140.9 1.297 < 0.5 0.048 122.4%

CO_SPK_AMB_000313.LAB 10/26/2010 12:32:51 < 1 141.3 1.295 < 0.5 0.048 120.5%

CO_SPK_AMB_000314.LAB 10/26/2010 12:33:07 < 1 140.6 1.288 < 0.5 0.054 107.9%

CO_SPK_AMB_000315.LAB 10/26/2010 12:33:22 < 1 141.2 1.290 < 0.5 0.053 110.7%

Prj No 1685
Isolatek, Huntington, IN, October 26, 2010  ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

: : < 1 8 1 < 0

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

Ethylene Recovery

(%)

Response Time*

(sec)

CTS_RESP_000378.LAB 10/26/2010 13:43:51 87.5 17796.8 1.686 < 0.5 0.0% 4

CTS_RESP_000379.LAB 10/26/2010 13:43:55 86.9 17851.1 1.660 < 0.5 0.0% 8

CTS_RESP_000380.LAB 10/26/2010 13:43:59 25.7 7295.6 1.928 7.2 7.2% 12

CTS_RESP_000381.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:03 2.6 471.7 0.409 84.2 84.2% 16

CTS_RESP_000382.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:07 < 1 110.7 0.101 97.1 97.1% 20

CTS_RESP_000383.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:11 < 1 61.5 0.067 97.4 97.4%

CTS_RESP_000384.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:15 < 1 45.2 0.057 98.4 98.4%

CTS_RESP_000385.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:19 < 1 36.3 0.056 98.1 98.1%

CTS_RESP_000386.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:23 < 1 30.9 < 0.05 98.8 98.8%

CTS_RESP_000387.LAB 10/26/2010 13:44:27 < 1 27.2 < 0.05 98.3 98.3%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Ambient Air, Prior to Anylte Spike #4

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

AMBIENT_AIR_000403.LAB 10/26/2010 13:49:12 < 1 4.0 1.294 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000404.LAB 10/26/2010 13:49:28 < 1 3.8 1.315 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000405.LAB 10/26/2010 13:49:44 < 1 3.5 1.307 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000406.LAB 10/26/2010 13:49:59 < 1 3.5 1.280 < 0.5

AMBIENT_AIR_000407.LAB 10/26/2010 13:50:15 < 1 3.2 1.287 < 0.5

Ambient Air Analyte Spike #4 ‐ Using 2423 ppm CO

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet) Dilution Factor

Carbon Monoxide

Recovery (%)

CO_SPK_AMB_000408.LAB 10/26/2010 13:56:17 < 1 115.9 1.242 < 0.5 0.042 113.8%

CO_SPK_AMB_000409.LAB 10/26/2010 13:56:32 < 1 115.9 1.224 < 0.5 0.056 85.6%

CO_SPK_AMB_000410.LAB 10/26/2010 13:56:48 < 1 115.7 1.224 < 0.5 0.056 84.6%

CO_SPK_AMB_000411.LAB 10/26/2010 13:57:04 < 1 115.8 1.226 < 0 5. 0.054 87.8%

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

N2_SYS_000412.LAB 10/26/2010 14:01:51 < 1 1.6 < 0.05 1.0

N2_SYS_000413.LAB 10/26/2010 14:02:06 < 1 1.9 0.056 1.3

N2_SYS_000414.LAB 10/26/2010 14:02:22 < 1 1.4 < 0.05 1.1

N2_SYS_000415.LAB 10/26/2010 14:02:38 < 1 1.6 0.056 1.3

N2_SYS_000416.LAB 10/26/2010 14:02:53 < 1 1.5 0.050 1.2

Nitrogen Direct to FTIR

Spectrum Date Time

COS

(ppmv wet)

CO

(ppmv wet)

H2O

(%v)

Ethylene

(ppmv wet)

N2_DIR_000001.LAB 10/26/2010 7:43:02 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000417.LAB 10/26/2010 14:09:01 < 1 0.8 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000418.LAB 10/26/2010 14:09:17 < 1 0.8 < 0.05 < 0.5

N2_DIR_000419.LAB 10/26/2010 14:09:32 < 1 0.7 < 0.05 < 0.5

Prj No 1685

Certificate of Analysis

Date of Analysis: 6/22/2006 Reference Number: 54-124068388-1

Part Number: X02NI99P15AD524

Grade of Product: PRIMARY

STANDARD

Cylinder Number Component Requested

Concentration

Actual Concentration

(Mole %)

CC156258 ETHYLENE 100.0 PPM 100.0 PPM

NITROGEN Balance Balance

Notes:

Relative Uncertainty of Analytical Value: +/- 1% of component or +/- 0.02% of absolute, which

ever is lower.

Primary Standard gas mixtures are traceable to N.I.S.T weights and/or N.I.S.T gas mixture

reference materials.

Signature on File

__________________________________

Approval Signature

Page 1
QJi

CJ, to!-’

i1s ii,...

it h$—

—LA OL

“—4g1t1QeJ It’

o 7*cto 1$10I

ahi )L

£L—JL

4

4

I

/

c) ‘50)..

sOb ‘g

Si—??

fl%qn)J*3wt4 fr

___

‘4J

w-zN sic Ze9

vsoqy a 7W4 ‘roar 1 SV1JS-Q) UI

er”v II •t) çjtcn& 34 (°()pl

3JS °k’@

ZN7 c&c

c453

-

d44ru fli’zv

Ssv

- wSdWt(n ire“I i-ii<i ,

ç —cT-zpi

ck2I 2/fl th

- EQh hh - I 9y

UJôth;14 ‘d-k_

i) cA - 7 )

I - L

4O?fW 2

Qj

L-goc

-o(-

z2:t -

cm 12z1o f- 9Z

LUht ‘hQI OSi)

I

I

A