alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-4825

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH MCKENZIE WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-125) Submitted: April 12, 2004 Decided: August 5, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary L. Lumsden, Rhonda Lee Overstreet, LUMSDEN, OVERSTREET & HANSEN, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Donald R. Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Carrol M. Ching, Third Year Practice Law Student, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Joseph McKenzie Williams appeals his conviction and sentence for posse ssion of heroin with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (2000). He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because his stop, arrest, and detention were not supported by probable cause. We review a district court’s legal determinations de novo. Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996); United States v. Rusher , 966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir. 1992). When a suppression motion has been denied, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. SeeUnited States v. Seidman , 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1998). Williams argues that the informant used by the police was not reliable and therefore did not provide probable cause. We hold that the information provided by the informant contained sufficient indicia of reliability because lying would have been against his penal interests. See United States v. Miller , 925 F.2d 695, 699 (4th Cir. 1991). We have reviewed the record and conclude that under the totality of the circumstances, sufficient probable cause existed to support Williams’s stop, arrest, and detention. See Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213, 230-32 (1983); United States v. Singh , ___ F.3d ___, ___, 2004 WL 691524, at *5 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2004).- 3 - Accordingly, we affirm Williams’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  940,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 940,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     940,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   940,847
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (76,543)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             76,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    75,543
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21


<PAGE>



                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant(1)


                                                  State of        Percentage
                                               Incorporation      Ownership
                                               -------------      ---------

Farmers and Mechanics Bank                      United States        100%

FMS Financial Services, Inc.(2)(4)              New Jersey           100%

Land Financial Services, Inc.(2)                New Jersey           100%

First Plunge, Inc. (3)(4)                       New Jersey           100%

Fishpond, Inc. (3)(4)                           New Jersey           100%

Angell Ayes, Inc. (3)(4)                        New Jersey           100%

Peter's Passion, Inc. (3)(4)                    New Jersey           100%

Atlantic Adventures, Inc.(3)                    New Jersey           100%

-----------------
(1)      The  operations of the  subsidiaries  are included in the  consolidated
         financial  statements  contained in the Annual  Report to  Stockholders
         attached as Exhibit 13 to the Form 10-K.
(2)      Subsidiary of Farmers and Mechanics Bank.
(3)      Subsidiary of Land Financial Services, Inc.
(4)      Currently an inactive subsidiary.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5515 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to authorize trade readjustment allowances 

under chapter 2 of title II of such Act to adversely affected workers 

who are subject to a lockout. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. STRICKLAND (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. FRANK

of Massachusetts, Mr. COSTELLO, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, and Mr. 

MCGOVERN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to authorize trade readjustment allowances under chapter 2 of title II of such 

Act to adversely affected workers who are subject to 

a lockout. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trade Readjustment 

5 Allowances for Adversely Affected Workers Act of 2006’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5515 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF TRADE READJUSTMENT AL2 LOWANCES UNDER CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE II 

3 OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974. 

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 231(a)(2) of the Trade 

5 Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2291(a)(2)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of 

7 this paragraph, any week in which employment is unavail8 able to such worker because of a lockout shall be treated 

9 as a week of employment under this paragraph.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The last sentence of section 

11 231(a)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974, as added by sub12 section (a), applies with respect to any week described in 

13 such sentence beginning on or after January 1, 2000. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
In the MATTER OF: K.W.

No. COA19-164

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 2, 2019

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


                                        
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Bay View Capital Corporation:

  We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial
condition of Bay View Capital Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as
of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.

  We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

  In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of Bay View Capital
Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 1997, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1997 and
1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
January 26, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Dean Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,441,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,123<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,517,311<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,517,311<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,174,535<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               722,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,452,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,452,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,452,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $31,123.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $1,044,574.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $127,081, accrued
management fees of $21,293 and accrued incentive fees of $21,097.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $1,068,453,
net change in unrealized of $750,900, and interest income of
$355,182.
</FN>



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifiesin his capacity as an officer of Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) that the QuarterlyReport of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition of the Company at the end of such period and results of operations of the Company forsuch period.     Date: August 11, 2005 By: /s/ Donald L. Denney         Donald L. Denney    President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)     Date: August 11, 2005 And: /s/ William C. Kurtz         William C. Kurtz    Senior Vice President and Treasurer    (Principal Financial Officer)
19
### SERVED: MAY 7, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### TGIFREIGHT FAA DOCKETNo. CP10NM0012 (Civil Penalty Case) DMS FAA-2010-1079 

### ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF AND AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Respondent TGI Freight ("Respondent") has moved for a one-week extensionto file its brief. In support, it cites schedule conflicts. It

### adds that Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") states that it does not oppose the request. Respondent's motion is hereby GRANTED. Whereupon, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. TGI Freight shall file its Post-Hearing Briefon orbefore the close ofbusiness on May 13, 2013; 2. Complainant shall file its Reply Brief, ifany, on orbefore May 31, 2013. If Complainant chooses not to file a Reply Brief, it is asked to notify Respondent and the Court in a timely manner.

### 2



### Attachment

- Service List Richard C. Goodwin Administrative LawJudge3

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite.2Wl0001

Rebecca J: Hozubin, Respondent's Counsel Wilkerson Hozubin 310 K Street, Suite 405 Anchorage, AK 99501 TEL: 907-276-5297 FAX: 907-276-5291 ONE COPY

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel Regional Counsel, Office ofRegional**Counsel~** AAL-7 Alaskan Region Federal Aviation Administration 222 W. 71 hAvenue #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5273 FAX: 907-271-2800 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.(El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 StaffAssistant 202-366-5121 FAX: 202-366-7536 FAA DocketNo. CP10NM0012 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Barry Lamperd, President and a director of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. for the interim period ended September  30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lamperd Less Lethal Inc.

Dated:  November 18, 2005

 

/s/ Barry Lamperd

Barry Lamperd

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, 

Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and will be retained by Lamperd Less Lethal Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael A. Gerlich, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gastar Exploration Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify
that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I further certify that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
May 6, 2010



/s/ MICHAEL A. GERLICHMichael A. Gerlich Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No s . 06

- 17

- 00183

- CR & 06

- 17

- 00184

- CR

MIRANDA RENEA KELSO, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No s . 41161CR & 41162CR

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 O R D E R Our review of the court reporter’s record s and the supplement al court reporter’s record s in th e s e case s indicates that they contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(3). The reporter’s record s and the supplemental reporter’s record s contain th e name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the reporter’s record s and the supplemental report er’s record s contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal all volumes

— including all exhibits

— of the electronically filed reporter’s record s and supplemental reporter’s record s in th e s e

case s . State’s Exhibit O ne, included within the reporter’s record s , was not electronically filed. This order is specifically intended to encompass that exhibit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: September 20, 2018
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tomkins plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James Nicol, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kenneth Lever, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that,



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ James Nicol        
|By: James Nicol        
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ Kenneth Lever      
|By: Kenneth Lever      
|Chief Financial Officer



May 15, 2006



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2009 (second half)



 EXHIBIT 10(e)(19) 
 Annual Performance Incentive Plan for 2009 (“APIP”) for Second Half 2009 
 Under the 2009 APIP, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive performance related cash payments. Payments are, in general, only made if performance objectives established by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) are met. 
 The Committee previously approved an incentive target
opportunity for the second half of 2009, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each participating officer. The Committee established overall threshold, base, target and maximum measures of performance for the second half of 2009 APIP at its
July 2009 meeting. The performance measures and weightings for the second half of 2009 were Cash Flow from Operations (65%) and Earnings per Share (35%). Certain additional goals were established for some officers based on business unit goals.

 The performance against the second half 2009 APIP goals was as follows: on an adjusted basis, earnings per share and cash flow from
operations exceeded maximum, resulting in an overall factor of 175% for the second half of 2009. These results, when combined with the previously approved results for the first half of 2009, yield a total payment of 150% of target for full fiscal
2009.